alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>




                                                                      EXHIBIT 99

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.   20549

Re:  Letter to Commission Pursuant to Temporary Note 3T

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Temporary Note 3T to Article 3 of Regulation S-X, Arthur Andersen
LLP ("Andersen") has represented to us, by letter dated April 1, 2002, that its
audit of the financial statements of MBT Financial Corp. for the period ended
December 31, 2001, was subject to Andersen's quality control system for the U.S.
accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that the
engagement was conducted in compliance with professional standards, that there
was appropriate continuity of Andersen personnel working on the audit and
availability of national office consultation. Availability of personnel at
foreign affiliates of Andersen was not relevant to this audit.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Eugene D. Greutman
    Eugene D. Greutman
    Treasurer






                                     - 66 -
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

(18 U.S.C. 1350) 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NovaDel Pharma Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Steven B. Ratoff, Interim President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael E. Spicer, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to his knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

| Date:  August 14, 2007 | By:    | /s/ STEVEN B. RATOFF                          |
|------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                   |   | Steven B. Ratoff                              |
|                   |   | Interim President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                   |   |                                          |
| Date:  August 14, 2007 | By:    | /s/ MICHAEL E. SPICER                         |
|                   |   | Michael E. Spicer                             |
|                   |   | Chief Financial Officer                       |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

 

This certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.
AMERICAN SKIING COMPANY


                  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS


     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of American  Skiing  Company (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 26, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
J. Fair, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date:  March 10, 2004

                                      By:   /s/ William J. Fair
                                      -------------------------
                                      William J. Fair
                                      President and Chief Executive Officer
                                      (Principal Executive Officer)






     This certification  accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant
to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the
extent  required  by such Act, be deemed  filed by the  Company for  purposes of
Section 18 of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  as amended (the  "Exchange
Act").  Such  certification  will not be deemed to be  incorporated by reference
into any filing under the  Securities  Act of 1933, as amended,  or the Exchange
Act,  except to the extent  that the  Company  specifically  incorporates  it by
reference.
EXHIBIT 99.1


March 22, 2002

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen,

Arthur Andersen LLP ("Andersen"), our independent public accountant, has
represented to us that its audit of our consolidated financial statements for
the year ended December 31, 2001, was subject to Andersen's quality control
system for its U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable
assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance with professional
standards and that there was appropriate continuity of Andersen personnel
working on the audit and appropriate availability of national office
consultation. Availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Arthur Andersen
is not relevant to this audit.


Very truly yours,

/s/ MICHAEL L. ARMSTRONG

Michael L. Armstrong
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Assistant Secretary
Windsor Woodmont Black Hawk Resort Corp.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACTAPPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) Ceres Caribe, Inc. ) ) Under Contract No. W912EP-07-C-0017 ) APPEARANCE FORTHE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 60530

Karl Dix, Jr., Esq.

Smith, Currie & Hancock LLP Atlanta, GA Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq.

Engineer ChiefTrial Attorney Carolyn J. Fox, Esq.

Engineer Trial Attorney U.S. Army Engineer District, Jacksonville OPINION BYADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE STEMPLER Itis the Board's decision, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. §§ 7105(e), 7108(b), and the parties' stipulation and agreement, that the appeal is sustained. In the nature ofa consentjudgment, the Board makes a monetary award to appellant in the amount of $250,000. Interest shall be paid on this amount pursuant to 41 U.S.C. § 7109 from 18 August 2009 until date ofpayment. Dated: 11 August 2016

(Signatures continued) Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract AppealsI concur 

# <V1A
RICHARD SHACKLEFORD Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I concur

# KE@;Ir?loB~ Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Opinion and Decision ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60530, Appeal ofCeres Caribe, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

2 JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
#### Eliseo GARCIA, Plaintiff-Appellant v. C.T. RANCHES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 10-50670

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 15, 2011.

Elíseo Garcia, Washington, MS, pro se.

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Elíseo Garcia, federal prisoner federal prisoner# 57842-180, has moved for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal from the denial of his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motions for relief for judgment and from the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for lack of jurisdiction. The district court denied Garcia IFP status on appeal and certified that the appeal was not taken in good faith under § 1915(a)(3).

By moving for leave to proceed IFP, Garcia is challenging the district court’s certification that the appeal is not taken in good faith. *See Baugh v. Taylor,*117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir.1997). Garcia’s July 12, 2010, notice of appeal from the district court’s June 30, 2009, dismissal of his suit for lack of jurisdiction, is untimely. *See*Fed. RApp. P. 4(a)(1)(A). Further, Garcia has not adequately briefed and has thus abandoned any challenge to the district court’s denial of IFP as to his Rule 60(b) motions. *See Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner,*813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir.1987).

Garcia has not demonstrated that he will raise a nonfrivolous issue on appeal. *See Howard v. King,*707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.1983). Accordingly, Garcia’s motion to proceed IFP is denied. *See Baugh,*117 F.3d at202 n. 24. Because his appeal is frivolous, *see Howard,,*707 F.2d at 219-20, the appeal is dismissed. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

The district court’s dismissal of Garcia’s claims against the defendants in *Garcia v.*
      *440
      *Henderson,*No. A-09-CA-377, as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) and our dismissal of this appeal as frivolous both count as strikes for purposes of § 1915(g). *See Adepegba v. Hammons,*103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir.1996). Garcia is warned that, if he accumulates three strikes pursuant to § 1915(g), he may not proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he “is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” § 1915(g).

MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Eligible to Naturalize Fact Sheet: 

Brownsville-Harlingen, TX 

Data Source: Office of Homeland Security Statistics 

14,260 Eligible to Naturalize Created February 2024 

This fact sheet provides information on select characteristics of people with Lawful Permanent Residence (LPR) status, also known 

as Green Card holders. Generally, an LPR is eligible to become a naturalized U.S. citizen after meeting certain requirements.

Providing more information on the eligible to naturalize population is in keeping with the Executive Order on Restoring Faith in Our 

Legal Immigration Systems and Strengthening Integration and Inclusion Efforts for New Americans (E.O. 14012). 

Throughout our history, the United States has welcomed immigrants from all over the world who have helped shape and define our 

country. Granting citizenship to eligible lawful permanent residents is vital to our nation’s security, economic prosperity, and a future 

built on the principles of the U.S. Constitution. Some of the benefits to becoming a U.S. citizen include the right to vote, traveling 

with a U.S. passport, bringing family members to the U.S., applying for federal jobs, and becoming an elected official. 

Top Countries of Birth 

Mexico 

12,840 

Philippines 

190 

Honduras 

110 

Cuba 

90 

Vietnam 

80 

El Salvador 

70 

Number of Years in LPR Status 

Generally, a Lawful Permanent 

Resident (or LPR) is eligible to 

become a naturalized U.S. 

citizen after meeting certain 

requirements such as length of 

time in LPR status; the length 

of time depends on the class of 

admission they were given as 

an LPR. 

2,150 

1,570 1,630 1,700 

1,520 1,550 1,630 

1,200 

720 

380 

220 

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 

Number of Years in LPR Status 
 

 

LPRs by Category of Admission 

After meeting certain 

eligibility 

requirements, a 

person can gain LPR 

status through family 

relationships, the 

diversity visa program, 

or as a refugee or 

asylee, among other 

ways. 

470 

Other 

10,900 

Immediate relatives 

of U.S. citizens 

D

2

ive

0 

rsity 

1

Refug

3

ees 

0 

and Asylees 

2,030 

Family-sponsored 

preferences 

Concentration of Eligible to Naturalize in the Region 

58% of the eligible to naturalize population 

resides in two zip codes. 

78521 4,130 

78520 3,570 

78526 2,170 

78550 1,390 

78586 1,140 

78575 200 

78559 170 

78523 130 

78593 80 

78583 70 

78597 60 

78522 50 

78567 50 

78553 30 

78592 30 

78535 <10 

78551 <10 

78552 <10 

78566 <10 

78578 <10 

Eligible to Naturalize by Age 

75 and Over <10 

60-74 <10 

50-59 2,660 

40-49 2,590 

30-39 3,630 

20-29 2,200 

15-19 <10 

Eligible to Naturalize by Gender 

59% 

of persons 

eligible 

were 

Female 

41% 

of persons 

eligible 

were Male 

1. Numbers are rounded to the nearest 10. Numbers may not sum to totals due to rounding.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                 5

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                       JUL-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                            APR-25-1999
<CASH>                                                                    9,107,000
<SECURITIES>                                                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                            13,009,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                                              13,357,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                         45,385,000
<PP&E>                                                                  529,643,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                                                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                          863,592,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                   137,143,000
<BONDS>                                                                 127,672,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                    42,698,000
<PREFERRED>                                                                       0
<COMMON>                                                                    303,000
<OTHER-SE>                                                              258,736,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                            863,592,000
<SALES>                                                                  21,109,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                        298,942,000
<CGS>                                                                    20,459,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                           192,356,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                         43,267,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                       29,213,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                         (7,344,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                              (768,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                     (6,576,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                                   0
<CHANGES>                                                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                                            (9,810,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                                (0.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                                (0.32)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 10.50**

**Application Letter for Drawing of Bank Loan Facility**

 No. Jie 2005 Zong 1145042R-10

**To: Shenzhen Branch, China Construction Bank**

In accordance with the Comprehensive Credit Facility Agreement (No. Jie 2005 Zong 1145042R, hereinafter referred to as “Agreement”) entered into between your company and us, namely, Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd., we would like to apply for the drawing of the loan facility under the Agreement.

I. We would like to apply for the bank loan of RMB Twenty Million Yuan (RMB 20,000,000 yuan).

II. The term of this bank loan shall be six months.

III. The purpose of this bank loan is for production working capital. 

IV. Interest Rate and Interest

| (1)    | Loan in RMB     |
|--------|-----------------|
|   |            |
| 1.     | Interest   Rate |

The interest rate for the bank loan is 4.725% per month fixed for the whole bank loan term.

| 2. | Penalty   Interest Rate |
|----|-------------------------|

The penalty interest rate is fixed at 9.45% per month in case that we use the bank loan for purpose other than that stated in this application letter;  

The penalty interest rate is fixed at 7.0875% per month in case that we delayed in repayment of the loan.

3.  The interest will be calculated from the date of transfer of the loan into the account of the Borrower. The interest will be calculated by the day and the daily interest = monthly interest/30 = annual interest/360. In case that we fail to pay the interest on time, compound interest will be imposed from the next day.

4. Payment of Interest 

  The interest will be paid monthly at the 20th day of each month. 

----

(2)  Loan in Foreign Currency

N/A

V.  Repayment Plan

  We will repay the principal of the loan according to the following schedule:  Date: 13 February 2007,  Amount: RMB 20,000,000.00 yuan

VI. This letter shall come into effect once it is signed by the legal representative (or authorized representative) of us and stamped with our company chop. This letter is an appendix and an integral part to the Agreement. This letter is irrevocable. We will perform our obligations strictly in accordance with the Agreement and its appendix. Please review and approve our application.

VII. This letter has three counterparts.

Applicant: Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. (stamped) Legal Representative (person in charge): Xiangqian Li (signed) Date: 14 August 2006

After examination, we approved the aboveapplication.  Shenzhen Branch, China Construction Bank (stamped) Personin charge or authorized representative: (signature):           /s/           Date: 14 August 2006

2

----
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 7, 2014

No. 04-14-00660-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.A.E., JR.,

From the County Court at Law No 2, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011CVQ002377-C3

Honorable Jesus Garza, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

A filing fee of $195.00 was due when this appeal was filed but it was not paid. See

TEXAS SUPREME COURT ORDER REGARDING FEES CHARGED IN THE SUPREME COURT, IN CIVIL 

CASES IN THE COURTS OF APPEALS, AND BEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT 

LITIGATION (Misc. Docket No. 13-9127, Aug. 16, 2013). The clerk of the court notified appellant 

of this deficiency in a letter dated September 19, 2014. The fee remains unpaid. Rule 5 of the 

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides:

A party who is not excused by statute or these rules from paying costs must pay—

at the time an item is presented for filing—whatever fees are required by statute 

or Supreme Court order. The appellate court may enforce this rule by any order 

that is just.

TEX. R. APP. P. 5. 

We therefore order appellant, not later than October 17, 2014 to either (1) pay the 

applicable filing fee or (2) provide written proof to this court that he is indigent or otherwise 

excused by statute or the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure from paying the fee. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 20.1 (providing that indigent party who complies with provisions of that rule may 

proceed without advance payment of costs). If appellant fails to respond satisfactorily within the 

time ordered, this appeal will be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 7th day of October, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 78 (Friday, April 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 21476]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9973]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[NAFTA-03705 Thaw Corporation, Snow Creek Division, Wenatchee, 
Washington; and NAFTA-3705A Thaw Corporation, Cutting Department, Kent, 
Washington]


Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for NAFTA 
Transitional Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with section 205(a), subchapter 2, title II, of the 
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273), the Department of Labor 
issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for NAFTA Transitional 
Adjustment Assistance on February 18, 2000, applicable to workers of 
Thaw Corporation, Snow Creek Division, Wenatchee, Washington. The 
notice was published in the Federal Register on March 17, 2000 (65 FR 
14628).
    At the request of the company, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in the production of fleece outerwear and thermal underwear. New 
information shows that worker separations occurred at the subject 
firms' Cutting Department, Kent, Washington in March, 2000. Workers 
perform cutting operations for all Thaw Corporation's production 
facilities, including Snow Creek Division, Wenatchee, Washington.
    Based on these new findings, the Department is amending the 
certification to cover workers at the Cutting Department, Kent, 
Washington location.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of Thaw Corporation who were adversely affected by a shift of 
production to Mexico.
    The amended notice applicable to NAFTA-03705 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Thaw Corporation, Snow Creek Division, Wenatchee, 
Washington (NAFTA-03705) and the Cutting Department, Kent, 
Washington (NAFTA-0305A) who became totally or partially separated 
from employment on or after January 28, 1999 through February 18, 
2002 are eligible to apply for NAFTA-TAA under Section 250 of the 
Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 12th day of April, 2000.
Grant D. Beale,
Program Manager, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-9973 Filed 4-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
##### 



Premier Foods plc Exhibit 13.1 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 USC. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I,
Robert Schofield, as Chief Executive of Premier Foods plc (the Company),
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  (1)
    
    the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F for the period ending
December 31, 2003, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Date: June 30, 2004
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Robert SchofieldName: Robert SchofieldTitle: Chief Executive
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Premier Foods plc and will be retained by Premier Foods plc and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### *In re*Yeomans.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department.*

May 2, 1890.)

Ho opinion. Motion of defendant denied. Motion of petitioner for leave to add supplemental charges to those now pending before the referee denied. See 6 N. Y. Supp. 946, 8 N. Y. Supp. 944.