alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w10wb






Exhibit 10.10(b)




June 9, 2009




Sasco Energy Partners

55 Green Farms Road

Westport, CT 06880-6149



Attention: Mr. Thomas K. Purdy




     Re: Management Agreement Renewals


Dear Mr. Purdy:



We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity
pools to which reference is made below (the “Management Agreements”). We are extending
the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2010 and all other provisions of
the Management Agreements will remain unchanged.





	 	•	 	CTA Capital LLC
	 
	 	•	 	Citigroup Emerging CTA Portfolio L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	Citigroup Energy Advisors Portfolio L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	CMF Sasco Master Fund L.P.




Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning
it
to the attention of Ms. Jennifer Magro at the address above or fax to 212-793-1986. If you
have
any questions I can be reached at 212-559-5046.




	 	 	 	 	 
	Very truly yours,



CITIGROUP MANAGED FUTURES LLC

 	 	 
	By:  	/s/ Jennifer Magro
 	 	 
	 	Jennifer Magro 	 	 
	 	Chief Financial Officer & Director 	 	 
	 
	SASCO ENERGY PARTNERS

 	 	 
	By:  	/s/ T.K. Purdy
 	 	 
	 	Print Name:  	 Thomas K. Purdy 	 	 
	 	 	 	 


JM/sr
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5869 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource study 

of the West Hunter Street Baptist Church in Atlanta, Georgia, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 27, 2010 

Mr. LEWIS of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special 

resource study of the West Hunter Street Baptist 

Church in Atlanta, Georgia, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘West Hunter Street 

5 Baptist Church Study Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY. 

7 (a) STUDY.—The Secretary of the Interior shall con8 duct a special resource study of the historic West Hunter 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5869 IH

1 Street Baptist Church, located at 775 Martin Luther King 

2 Jr. Drive, S.W., Atlanta, Georgia. 

3 (b) CONTENTS.—In conducting the study under sub4 section (a), the Secretary shall— 

5 (1) evaluate the national significance of the 

6 site; 

7 (2) determine the suitability and feasibility of 

8 designating the area as a unit of the National Park 

9 System; 

10 (3) consider other alternatives for preservation, 

11 protection, and interpretation of the site by Federal, 

12 State, or local governmental entities, or private and 

13 nonprofit organizations; 

14 (4) consult with interested Federal, State, or 

15 local governmental entities, private and nonprofit or16 ganizations or any other interested individuals; and 

17 (5) identify cost estimates for any Federal ac18 quisition, development, interpretation, operation, and 

19 maintenance associated with the alternatives. 

20 (c) APPLICABLE LAW.—The study required under 

21 subsection (a) shall be conducted in accordance with sec22 tion 8 of Public Law 91–383 (16 U.S.C. 1a–5; commonly 

23 known as the ‘‘National Park Service General Authorities 

24 Act’’). 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5869 IH

1 (d) REPORT.—Not later than 3 years after the date 

2 on which funds are first made available for the study 

3 under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the 

4 Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Rep5 resentatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural 

6 Resources of the Senate a report containing the results 

7 of the study and any conclusions and recommendations of 

8 the Secretary. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS AS OF  AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>


<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     Cdn.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                0.6758
<CASH>                                         749,214
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  144,832
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    122,553
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,016,599
<PP&E>                                         47,369
<DEPRECIATION>                                 11,127
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6,222,293
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          297,958
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       13,510,163
<OTHER-SE>                                     (7,585,828)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6,222,293
<SALES>                                        13,632
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               13,632
<CGS>                                          10,283
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  10,283
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               145,414
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (934)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (141,131)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (141,131)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (141,131)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.01)
<FN>
THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS WERE PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CANADIAN GENERALLY
ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES.
</FN>



</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph DiLaura, Appellant.

Memorandum: Defendant moved to dismiss the indictment on the basis of an 18-month preindictment delay. The court denied the motion without a hearing. In its memorandum decision, the court wrote that defendant "has no constitutional right (absent arrest) to be indicted at his convenience.” While that may be true, albeit irrelevant, it is obvious that the court misperceived the applicable law in denying defendant’s motion solely on the ground that the indictment was returned within the statutory period of limitation. Unreasonable preindictment delay may, in special circumstances, constitute a denial of due process of law *(see, People v Singer,*44 NY2d 241, 252-256).

Nevertheless, we affirm. Defendant’s moving papers asserted only a routine claim of prejudice and were insufficient to establish special circumstances *(see, People v Fuller,*57 NY2d 152, 159-160).

We have reviewed defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J. — burglary, third degree, and grand larceny, second degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Denman, Green and Lawton, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.46
                                 William Merker



Paul Provost
Standard Automotive Corporation

Dear Paul,                                                August 27, 2001

         Reference is hereby made to certain resolutions of the Board of
Directors of Standard Automotive Corporation ("Standard") dated May l6, 2001
(the "Settlement") and the appraisal report prepared by Appraisal Economics Inc.
dated August 16, 2001 (the "Report") which values 200,000 common shares of
Standard as of March 31, 2001 (the "Shares").

         This shall confirm that although the Report values each Share in a
range between $2.54 and $3.06, the parties hereto agree that the price per Share
for final valuation purposes shall be $2.88. Accordingly, the undersigned hereby
encloses (i) a promissory note made payable to Standard in the amount of
$201,500 (ii) proof of payment to Appraisal Economics Inc. in the amount of
$22,500 and (iii) a share certificate representing 200,000 shares of Standard
together with a stock power executed in blank, all in full satisfaction of the
terms and conditions recited in the Settlement.

         Set forth below is a summary of the settlement terms:

Amount due Standard                               $800,000
Value of 200,000 common shares                    ($576,000)
Amount paid to Appraisal Economics Inc.           ($22,500)
Promissory Note                                   ($201,500)

Please acknowledge your consent to the forgoing by executing a copy of this
letter and returning same to the undersigned.

Acknowledged and Agreed:                          Very truly yours,

Standard Automotive Corporation                   /s/ WILLIAM MERKER

                                                  William Merker

By: /s/ PAUL PROVOST
   ---------------------------
    Paul Provost, Director
#### Patricia Ching, Respondent, v Peter Ching, Appellant.

—Order unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and defendant’s motion granted. Memorandum: Special Term improperly denied defendant’s motion for leave to serve a late answer to plaintiff’s complaint on the grounds that defendant failed to submit an affidavit of merit.

Defendant was two days late in serving his answer. On this record, it is clear that defendant has established an excuse for his tardiness and that plaintiff has failed to show any prejudice, a conclusion correctly reached by Special Term. However, CPLR 3012 (d) does not require an affidavit of merit as a precondition to obtaining relief under the statute, and the court abused its discretion in denying defendant’s motion *(see, Shure v Village of Westhampton Beach,*121 AD2d 887; *Continental Cas. Co. v Cozzolino Constr. Corp.,*120 AD2d 779; *935
      *Mufalli v Ford Motor Co.,*105 AD2d 642, 644). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Tenney, J. — late answer.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Green, Lawton and Schnepp, JJ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

QUINCY RAHSAAN ANDERSON

, ) ) P etitioner

, ) )

v. ) Civil Action No. 1: 24

- cv

- 01067 (UNA) ) ) KIM BROWN

, et al

., ) ) Respondents

. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Petitioner appearing pro se is a state inmate who is awaiting sentence, and he is currently

designated to Franklin County Corrections Center , located in Columbus, Ohio . He has filed a

petition for writ of habeas corpus (“Pet.”), ECF No. 1, seeking relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 22 54,

and an application for leave to proceed in forma pa uperis (“IFP”), ECF No. 2. He challenges his

conviction, entered on January 11, 2024, by the Franklin County Common Pleas Court , alleging

that he suffered several constitutional violations, including infringement of his right to speedy trial

and acts of p rosecutorial misconduct. See Pet. at 2

– 3, 6, 8

– 9, 11. As a result, h e demands that the

court vacate his conviction. See id . at 11.

Federal review of state convictions is available under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 only after the

exhaustion of available state reme dies. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1). Thereafter, “an application for a

writ of habeas corpus [ ] made by a person in custody under the judgment and sentence of a State

court . . . may be filed in the district court for the district wherein such person is in cu stody or in

the district court for the district within which the State court was held which convicted and

sentenced [the petitioner] and each of such district courts shall have concurrent jurisdiction to

entertain the application.” 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d).First, petitioner has, admittedly, not yet exhausted his state remedies. See Pet. at 3, 9.

Indeed, h e asserts that his direct appeal before the Ohio Court of Appeal s is still pending. See id

.
Second, even if petitioner had exhausted his state remedies, he was convicted and sentenced in

Ohio, and is also incarcerated there. See id . at 2. Consequently, after petitioner has exhausted his

state remedies, he must file his § 2254 petition in the Un ited States District Court for the Southern

District of Ohio.

For these reasons, p etitioner has no recourse in this District, and his p etition will be

dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). A separate o rder accompanies this

m emorand um o pinion.

__________/s/_____________ Date: May 22, 2024 AMIT P. MEHTA United States District Judge
EXHIBIT 32.01



The following certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or
otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and
irrespective of any general incorporation language in any filings.



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SigmaTel, Inc., a Delaware corporation, for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, each of the undersigned officers of SigmaTel, Inc. certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his respective knowledge:



(1) the quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) the information contained in the quarterly report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SigmaTel, Inc. for the periods presented therein.



Date: October 19, 2004



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Ronald P. Edgerton 
|Ronald P. Edgerton     
|Chief Executive Officer



Date: October 19, 2004



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Ross A. Goolsby    
|Ross A. Goolsby        
|Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of the above
certification has been provided to SigmaTel, Inc. and will be retained by SigmaTel, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,956
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      156
<ALLOWANCES>                                        40
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,121
<PP&E>                                              13
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,137
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              370
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            39
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,728
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,137
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   584
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      931
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (313)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (313)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (313)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-30835 Summary Calendar

JAMES BUNCH, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus BURL CAIN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 97-CV-3688-T

-------------------- December 1, 1999 Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * James Bunch, Louisiana state prisoner #98639, has filed a request for the issuance of a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal from the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. Bunch argues that the district court erred by denying his § 2254 petition as time-barred. Bunch’s fourth application for state habeas relief tolled the applicable limitation period from May 14, 1996, until June 20, 1997. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(2). With the benefit of the resulting toll,No. 99-30835 -2- Bunch’s federal habeas petition was filed within the limitations period established by the AEDPA. Accordingly, COA is GRANTED, the judgment of the district court is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings.
# Plug-ins

Some of our files require a plug-in to view.****

**Note**: We are providing the following links to these plug ins so our viewers may access information using these products stored on our website. USCIS does not endorse any non-government websites, companies, or applications.
                - Adobe Acrobat PDF Reader Download
                - Excel (*.xls)
                - PowerPoint (*.ppt)
                - Word (*.doc)

10/20/2021

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
U.S. COAST GUARD CEREMONIAL HONOR GUARD 

MISSION REQUEST FORM 

Please email the completed form to Honor Guard Operations at HQS-Honor_Guard-OPS@uscg.mil.

NAME OF ORGANIZATION POC/REQUESTOR NAME

POC ADDRESS (Street, City, State, Zip) DATE REQUEST MADE**

TYPE OF REQUEST (Place an “X” within the appropriate box)

COLOR GUARD† DRILL TEAM† FLAG-FOLD CORDON FUNERAL OTHER (specify below)

EVENT NAME EVENT LOCATION EVENT TIME EVENT DATE** 

POC EMAIL ADDRESS POC TELEPHONE # EVENT DAY TELEPHONE # 

PARKING LOCATION EST. AUDIENCE SIZE

REASON FOR REQUEST (Please specify the impact that Honor Guard presence will have on your event, ex. public relations opportunities, etc.)

LOCATION TO MEET POC UPON ARRIVAL 

ADDITIONAL NOTES 

NOTE: Due to obligations to the Military District of Washington and Arlington National Cemetery, all requests, 

even after approval, are subject to cancellation at any time. We appreciate your understanding and flexibility. 

Per Honor Guard SOP, the Honor Guard will only support retirement requests for 0-5 and above, CWO4, Master

Chiefs, and members with 30 plus years of service. Waivers must be routed through the Honor Guard 

Commanding Officer.

† The ideal minimum height requirements are 17’ for Color Guard and 20’ for Drill Team. The Drill Team also has an ideal 

spacing requirement of 35’x35’ for the full team and 15’x15’ for the Center Four performance. In all cases, however, the 

Honor Guard is flexible and is willing to make exceptions as necessary. 

*The Honor Guard requests that funding be provided for all missions at a distance of 75 miles or greater from

Coast Guard Honor Guard (Alexandria, VA). If funding is unavailable, the approval of the request will be left to the

discretion of the Honor Guard CO.

** This request must be received no later than 05 days prior to the event date. 

If you have any questions or concerns, please call Honor Guard Operations at (703) 313-5411 or email HQSHonor_Guard-OPS@uscg.mil For urgent matters, you may contact the Honor Guard Quarterdeck at

(703) 313-5400.

FOR FUNERALS ONLY

CASKET URN

NEXT OF KIN (Name, relationship to deceased)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Westell Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on their knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for the
periods covered in the Report.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Richard S. Gilbert 
|Richard S. Gilbert     
|Chief Executive Officer
|November 12, 2009      
|                       
|/s/ Brian S. Cooper    
|Brian S. Cooper        
|Chief Financial Officer
|November 12, 2009      

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Westell Technologies, Inc. and will be retained
by Westell Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification
is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.



33