alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Office of Equal Opportunity and Inclusion

## Leadership

Paula Thomas is the chief of the Office of Equal Opportunity and Inclusion.

The Office of Equal Opportunity and Inclusion (OEOI) develops and delivers quality programs and services to try to ensure equality of employment opportunity, promote and sustain a diverse workforce, and foster workplace inclusion through the utilization of data-driven, strategic and collaborative approaches.

Our goals include:
                    - Maintaining an efficient, fair and impartial equal employment opportunity (EEO) complaint resolution process.
                    - Promoting inclusion and diversity at all levels of the organization through workforce analysis and barrier elimination/mitigation.
                    - Providing an effective disability accommodation program to ensure that individuals with disabilities receive full access to equal employment opportunity.

The Office of Equal Opportunity and Inclusion is made up of three divisions:
                    - Complaints Resolution Division (CRD)
                    - Diversity Management Operations Division (DMOD)
                    - Policy, Planning and Resources Division (PPRD)

The Complaints Resolution Division administers the EEO complaint process and promotes early resolution of workplace disputes. It also provides technical assistance to ensure compliance with federal anti-discrimination laws and guidelines and promotes proactive prevention strategies through training and education.

The Diversity Management Operations Division spearheads the agency’s efforts to promote a diverse workforce and foster an inclusive work environment through its diversity and inclusion and disability accommodation programs that provide guidance and support in the areas of targeted recruitment support, special emphasis programs, and outreach and training.

The Policy, Planning, and Resources Division is responsible for internal office functions such as budgeting, personnel, and resources, as well as contracting, external training requests, workforce analysis, and policy development.

08/02/2019

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
EXHIBIT 23.2

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration  Statements on Form
S-8 (No. 333-119097) of China Energy Savings Technology,  Inc. and subsidiary of
our report,  dated  January 29, 2004,  appearing  in this Annual  Report on Form
10-KSB of China Energy  Savings  Technology,  Inc. and  subsidiary  for the year
ended September 30, 2004.


/s/ Webb & Company, P.A.

Webb & Company, P.A.
Boynton Beach, Florida
January 31, 2005
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5885 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to terminate the advance 

payment of the earned income tax credit. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 27, 2010 

Mr. LINDER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to terminate 

the advance payment of the earned income tax credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF ADVANCED EARNED INCOME 

4 CREDIT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 25 of the Internal Rev6 enue Code of 1986 is amended by striking section 3507 

7 (relating to advance payment of earned income credit). 

8 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

9 (1) Section 32 of such Code is amended by 

10 striking subsection (g). 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5885 IH

1 (2) Section 6012(a) of such Code is amended 

2 by striking paragraph (8) and redesignating para3 graph (9) as paragraph (8). 

4 (3) Section 6051(a) of such Code is amended 

5 by striking paragraph (7). 

6 (4) Section 6302 of such Code is amended by 

7 striking subsection (i). 

8 (5) The table of sections for chapter 25 of such 

9 Code is amended by striking the item relating to sec10 tion 3507. 

11 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

12 this section shall apply to remuneration paid after Decem13 ber 31, 2010. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
November 13, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

KIRBY HALL AKA KENDELL DAVIS, Appellant

NO. 14-13-00742-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
#### In the Matter of Jose Rivera et al., Respondents, v Alice Sachs et al., Respondents, and Augustin Alamo, Appellant. In the Matter of Augustin Alamo et al., Appellants, v Alice Sachs et al., Respondents. (And Another Consolidated Action.)

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Carl J. Mugglin, J.), entered on August 17, 1987, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. No opinion. Concur—Kassal, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Wallach and Smith, JJ.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of ImproveNet, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), for the quarterly period ended September
30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report") I, Jeffrey I. Rassas, Co-Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m(a)
        or 78o(d)): and

    2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.

ImproveNet, Inc.

/s/ Jeffrey I. Rassas
------------------------------------
Jeffrey I. Rassas
Co-Chairman and CEO

Dated: November 13, 2003
Stakeholder Message

New Version of Form N-400, Application for Naturalization

What You Need to Know

On April 1, 2024, as part of the new fee rule, we will release a new version of Form N400, Application for Naturalization. The new version of the form changes many data

elements, including adding a gender X option as another gender identity and removing 

several other fields.

If you have begun completing the current version of Form N-400 online,

you must submit your online application on or before March 31, 2024, or

you will lose your work. On April 1, we will delete any Form N-400 drafts in 

progress online, and you will have to restart the application using the new version of 

Form N-400, which will be automatic for online filers starting on that date. This

requirement only applies to Form N-400.

The new Form N-400 for paper filing will available on the Form N-400 web page on

April 1. Starting June 3, 2024, we will accept only the April 1, 2024, edition of the paperbased Form N-400.

For More Information

For more information, visit our Form N-400, Application for Naturalization page.

For more information on USCIS and its programs, please visit uscis.gov or follow us on

X (formerly Twitter), Instagram, YouTube, Facebook, and LinkedIn.
#### In the Matter of Patrick Perrella, Petitioner, v Suffolk County Classification and Salary Appeals Board et al., Respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Suffolk County Classification and Salary Appeals Board (hereinafter the board), dated July 16, 1984, which, after an informal hearing at which no minutes were taken, denied the petitioner’s request to upgrade the salary of his position. By order of this court dated February 3, 1986, the matter was remitted to the board for the making of findings of fact *(see, Matter of Perrella v Suffolk County Classification & Salary Appeals Bd.,*117 AD2d 603). The board has now complied.

Justice Kunzeman has been substituted for former Justice Lazer *(see,*22 NYCRR 670.2 [c]).

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

This court remitted the instant matter to the board for the making of findings with respect to the board’s denial of the petitioner’s request to upgrade the salary of his position based upon the conclusion that the board’s determination could not be reviewed since the record gave "no indication of what facts or evidence, if any, were relied upon by the Board” *(Matter of Perrella v Suffolk County Classification & Salary Appeals Bd., supra,*at 604) in reaching its conclusion. The board, pursuant to our order, has now filed its findings, which reveal that in making its decision it considered the job comparison sheet filed by the petitioner at the hearing, the petitioner’s oral presentation, and the job specifications of the two positions in issue. The board found, after reviewing the foregoing evidence, that demonstrable differences existed between the two positions, particularly in the area of supervisory experience.

Review of the board’s findings and conclusion discloses that it considered all aspects of the petitioner’s salary reclassification appeal and based its decision upon discernible distinctions in the qualifications of the two positions. After considering the petitioner’s contentions in light of the foregoing, we are now able to conclude that the board’s decision was neither arbi*408trary and capricious nor an abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we confirm its determination *(see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ.,*34 NY2d 222; *Matter of Cortland-Clinton, Inc. v New York State Dept. of Health,*59 AD2d 228). Bracken, J. P., Niehoff, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Hill, Appellant.

Submitted April 2, 2007;

decided April 26, 2007

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Robert S. Dean, Esq., Center for Appellate Litigation, 74 Trinity Place, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10006 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 02-12

IN RE: RECALL OF SENIOR JUDGE

O R D E R

WHEREAS the Court has been receiving approximately300 Notices ofAppeal everymonth,

as well as numerous motions and other filings, and

WHEREAS appeals, motions, and other filings with the Court deserve timelyjudicial review

and decision, and

WHEREAS the Chief Judge of the Court, pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7257(b)(1), may recall

Senior Judges of the Court who have retired but who have agreed to be available for such recall

when their service is needed by the Court, and

WHEREAS the Chief Judge of the Court has determined that the service of a Senior Judge

is needed by the Court and, if recalled, that Senior Judge would perform judicial duties and provide

substantial service to the Court, and

WHEREAS Senior Judge Ronald M. Holdaway has consented to be available for recall as

needed by the Court,

THEREFORE, it is

ORDERED that Ronald M. Holdaway is recalled from retired status to have and to exercise

all of the judicial powers and duties of the office of a Judge in active service and to otherwise

perform substantial service for the Court as requested by the Chief Judge. It is further

ORDERED that Judge Holdaway shall serve in recalled status in this calendar yearto review

and decide appeals, motions, and other filings with the Court, and to perform other substantial

service at the request of the Chief Judge, and he shall so serve throughout the calendar year for up

to 90 days or its equivalent. With his consent, Judge Holdaway's service may be extended beyond

90 days. Judge Holdaway's service shall be recorded and maintained by the Clerk of the Court.

DATED: January 6, 2012 BY THE COURT:

Bruce E. Kasold

Chief Judge
II 

Calendar No. 552 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5827 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 29, 2010 

Received 

AUGUST 5, 2010 

Read the first time 

AUGUST 12, 2010 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

AN ACT 

To amend title 11 of the United States Code to include 

firearms in the types of property allowable under the 

alternative provision for exempting property from the 

estate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Gun Own5 ers in Bankruptcy Act of 2010’’. 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5827 PCS

1 SEC. 2. EXEMPTIONS. 

2 Section 522 of title 11, the United States Code, is 

3 amended— 

4 (1) in subsection (d) by adding at the end the 

5 following: 

6 ‘‘(13) The debtor’s aggregate interest, not to 

7 exceed $3,000 in value, in a single rifle, shotgun, or 

8 pistol, or any combination thereof.’’, and 

9 (2) in subsection (f)(4)(A)— 

10 (A) in clause (xiv) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

11 end, 

12 (B) in clause (xv) by striking the period at 

13 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’, and 

14 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

15 ‘‘(xvi) The debtor’s aggregate interest, not to 

16 exceed $3,000 in value, in a single rifle, shotgun, or 

17 pistol, or any combination thereof.’’. 

18 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS. 

19 (a) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Except as provided in sub20 section (b), this Act and the amendments made by this 

21 Act shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this 

22 Act. 

23 (b) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS.—The amend24 ments made by this Act shall apply only with respect to 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 5827 PCS

1 cases commenced under title 11 of the United States Code 

2 on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 28, 2010. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 552 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5827 

AN ACT 

To amend title 11 of the United States Code to inproperty from the estate. under the alternative provision for exempting clude firearms in the types of property allowable 

AUGUST 12, 2010 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
# Minor Eligibility Attestation

Yкраїнський переклад|Русский

As a prospective parolee for the Uniting for Ukraine parole process, DHS wants to ensure you are aware of the program eligibility requirements for children under the age of 18.

Children who are under the age of 18 may only participate in Uniting for Ukraine if they are traveling to the United States with and in the care and custody of their parent or legal guardian. Parents or legal guardians traveling with a minor child should be prepared to provide documentation of their relationship to the child upon arrival to the United States. If this proof is not available, for the protection and welfare of the child, U.S. law may require that the child be placed in the custody of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). 
                -  I understand that only minors (under the age of 18) traveling with and in the care and custody of a parent or legal guardian are eligible to participate in the Uniting for Ukraine process.
                - If I travel with a child of whom I am the parent or legal guardian, I am able to provide documentation as evidence of my parental relationship or legal guardianship of the child. Evidence may include a birth certificate for the child, and identity documents for the parent or legal guardian. Generally, evidence of legal guardianship requires that a legal or administrative process involving the courts or other recognized government entity take place (i.e., a power of attorney or written and/or notarized statement is not a formally recognized arrangement). 
                - If I travel with a child of whom I am not the parent or legal guardian, then it is possible that upon arrival at the United States Port of Entry, the child will be referred to the Department of Health and Human Services as an unaccompanied child.

05/23/2022

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
#### In the Matter of Edward Moskowitz, an Attorney, Appellant. Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, Respondent.

Submitted April 30, 2007;

decided May 8, 2007

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.
EXHIBIT 31.1
  CERTIFICATION
  I, Alberto DiBella, certify that:
  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Enviro Voraxial Technology, Inc.;
  2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
  4.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
  (a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
  (b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or cause such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
  (c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
  (d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
  5.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditor and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  (a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
  (b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
  Date: May 24, 2010
  /s/ Alberto DiBella
 Alberto DiBella
 Chief Executive Officer
Amendment to the Carnival Corporation "Fun Ship" Nonqualified Savings Plan.



 Exhibit 10.1 
 AMENDMENT TO THE CARNIVAL CORPORATION 
 FUN SHIP
NONQUALIFIED SAVINGS PLAN 
  
 The Carnival Corporation Fun Ship Nonqualified Savings Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended, effective January 1, 2010, as follows (deletions struck-through, additions bolded): 
 Section 5.4 of the Plan is amended to add the following sentence at the end: 
 All Profit-Sharing Contributions made in accordance with Section 5.3 on account of the Plan Year that begins on or after
January 1, 2010 shall be fully vested and non-forfeitable at all times.
Exhibit 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual report of Australian Agriculture Property
Development Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending
December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert Kohn, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (3)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (4)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

Date:  May 18, 2005                                By: /s/ Robert Kohn
                                                      ----------------
                                                   Robert Kohn
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT
      23.2**





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
      Form
      S-8 (No. 333-107519) of DiCon Fiberoptics, Inc. of our report dated May 11,
      2005
      relating to the financial statements of Global Fiberoptics, Inc. and the
      financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-KSB.








/s/
      PricewaterhouseCoopers


**PricewaterhouseCoopers** Kaohsiung,
      Taiwan


June
      28,
      2005
# Forms Available to File Online

This page lists the USCIS forms that are currently available to file online. To learn about the benefits of filing a form using our secure online system, visit the File Online page, where you can get started by first creating a free USCIS online account.

In addition to submitting a form online, if you are immigrating to the United States as a lawful permanent resident, you must pay the USCIS Immigrant Fee unless exempted. You can pay this fee online. You may also pay for your travel document online.

03/21/2024

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.