alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          20,719
<SECURITIES>                                    32,965
<RECEIVABLES>                                  106,201
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           3,646
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,037
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 164,260
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,453
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           104
<OTHER-SE>                                      94,728
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   164,260
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,418
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,139
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (555)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 821
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,013
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,124
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,889
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,889
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .46


</TABLE>
Order issued October30, 2012

In The 

### (!nitrt uf n1at, 

## fiftI! Jitrirt uf 

## ixu tt Jtllzu No. 05-10-00690-CV ARGO I)ATA RESO1JRCE CORPORATION AND MAX MARTIN, Appellants 

### V. BALKRISHNA SHAGRITHAYA, INDIVIDUALLY AND DERIVAT!VELY IN THE NAN’IE OF ARGO DATARESOURCE CORPORATION, Appellee ORDER Before Justices Morris. Fillmore, and Myers Appel1ees September 13. 2012 Motion ibr En Bane Rehearing is DENIED.

[CE
#### 41 Kew Gardens Road Associates et al., Respondents, v Stanley Tyburski et al., Appellants.

Appeal by the defendants from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated April 28, 1987.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Di Tucci in his memorandum decision in the Supreme Court, Queens County. Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-10290

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JIMMY LEE PRUETT

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:05-CR-113-2

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jimmy Lee Pruett pleaded guilty to possession of a controlled substance

with intent to distribute and was sentenced to 188 months of imprisonment and

four years of supervised release. 

Pruett argues that sentencing guidelines enhancements for possession of

a firearm and for the reckless endangerment of another during flight should not

have been applied in the calculation of his sentence. The Government seeks to

enforce Pruett’s waiver of his right to appeal his sentence.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 24, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-10290

2

Our review of the record shows that Pruett’s appeal waiver was knowing

and voluntary and that, under the plain language of the plea agreement, the

waiver applies to the circumstances at hand. See United States v. Burns, 433

F.3d 442, 445-46 (5th Cir. 2005); United States v. McKinney, 406 F.3d 744, 746

(5th Cir. 2005). Pruett’s argument that his claims should be reviewed for a

manifest miscarriage of justice in spite of the appeal waiver lacks merit.

Accordingly, Pruett’s appeal waiver bars review of the issues he seeks to raise

on appeal.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED, the Government’s

motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the Government’s motions

to dismiss and for an extension of time are DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       5,181,359
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,136,623
<ALLOWANCES>                                   107,553
<INVENTORY>                                  4,676,372
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,940,193
<PP&E>                                       4,784,344
<DEPRECIATION>                                 396,881
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,404,105
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,531,606
<BONDS>                                     10,427,543
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       206,212
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,194,053
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,404,405
<SALES>                                      5,258,903
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,258,903
<CGS>                                        3,313,091
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,313,091
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,087,562
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,694,153
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,835,903)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       876
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,836,780)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                150,708
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,686,072)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.09)
        

</TABLE>
# Office of Citizenship

The USCIS Office of Citizenship is mandated by the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (Pub. L. No. 107–296) to promote instruction and training on citizenship rights and responsibilities, including the development of educational materials.

The mission of the Office of Citizenship is to provide federal leadership, tools, and resources to proactively foster civic integration. To facilitate this process, the Office of Citizenship engages and supports partners to welcome immigrants; promote English language learning and education on the rights and responsibilities of citizenship; and encourage U.S. citizenship. The work of the Office of Citizenship is focused on three specific areas:
                - Providing immigrants with opportunities and tools to become vested citizens 
                - Building community capacity to prepare immigrants for citizenship
                - Promoting dialogue and collaboration on civic integration and raising awareness of its importance to society

To learn more about the tools and resources that Office of Citizenship provides, visit the Citizenship Resource Center. 

02/17/2021

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
#### Vicki REEVE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SEI/AARON’S, INC. d/b/a Aaron’s Sales and Lease, Defendant-Appellee.*

No. 10-2773-cv.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

June 17, 2011.

Gerald T. Walsh, Zdarsky, Sawicki & Agostinelli LLP, Buffalo, NY, for Appellant.

Adam W. Perry, Joseph S. Brown, Hodgson Russ LLP, Buffalo, NY, for Appellee.

PRESENT: JON O. NEWMAN, ROGER J. MINER, GERARD E. LYNCH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The Clerk of Court is instructed to amend the official caption in this case to conform to the listing of the parties above.

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff-appellant Vicki Reeve appeals from a June 3, 2010 judgment of the district court (Curtin, *J.)*granting summary judgment to defendant-appellee SEI/Aaron’s, Inc. (“SEI”) on Reeve’s employment discrimination and retaliation claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq., and the New York State Human Rights Law, N.Y. Exec. Law § 296 (McKinney 2005). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, procedural history, and issues on appeal.

We review orders granting summary judgment de novo, focusing on whether the district court properly concluded that there was “no genuine issue as to any material fact” and that the “moving party [was] entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” *Allianz Ins. Co. v. Lerner,*416 F.3d 109, 113 (2d Cir.2005). Having conducted a de novo review of the record, we affirm the grant of summary judgment in favor of SEI for substantially the same reasons stated by the district court in its thorough and well-reasoned opinion. *See Reeve v. SEI/Aaron’s, Inc.,*No. 06-CV-0642C, 2010 WL 2287482 (W.D.N.Y. June 2, 2010).

*76Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended Annual Report of Cyber Defense Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A-3 for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Amended
Report"), I, William C. Robinson, CEO, CFO, Chairman and Principal Executive,
Financial and Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:

(1) The Amended Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Amended Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                                  CYBER DEFENSE SYSTEMS, INC.


                                              By: /s/ William C. Robinson
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  William C. Robinson
                                                  CEO, Chairman and
                                                  Principal Executive Officer

                                                  June 22, 2006
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Andrew Kent CLARK, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-11012

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 21, 2011.

Paulina M. Jacobo, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Lubbock, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Kevin Joel Page, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Dallas, TX, David E. Sloan, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Lubbock, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and STEWART and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Andrew Kent Clark has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Clark has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
EXHIBIT 10.1
                              PROMISSORY NOTE

$15,330.00                                            Santa Ana, California
                                                           February 4, 2002

     THE UNDERSIGNED promises to pay to the order of Mezzanine Capital Ltd.
at Clarendon House, 2 Church Street, Hamilton HM DX, Bermuda, or at such
other place as the holder hereof may designate in writing, the sum of fifteen
thousand three hundred thirty dollars ($15,330.00), with interest thereon at
the rate of 10% per annum from the date of the original promissory note,
February 4, 2000.  Principal and interest shall be due and payable upon
demand.  This note shall replace the promissory note for these funds dated
February 4, 2001, originally due on February 4, 2002.

     Prepayment of this note may be made at any time without penalty.

     In the event of commencement of suit to enforce payment of this note,
the undersigned agrees to pay such additional sum as attorney's fees as the
court may adjudge reasonable.

                                         Cygni Investments, Inc.

                                         By: /s/ Carl Suter
                                             Carl Suter, President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE
THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             999
<SECURITIES>                                    30,125
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,484
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,568
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,387
<PP&E>                                          34,493
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,143
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  78,033
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,331
<BONDS>                                             20
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            4,959
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        89,753
<OTHER-SE>                                    (50,855)  <F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    78,033
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               115,523
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   96,941
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,060  <F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   756
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 106
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,536
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,222
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,314
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,314
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .46  <F3>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .44
<FN>
<F1> Accumulated deficit.
<F2> Other income, net of expenses.
<F3> Includes dividends and accretion on mandatorily redeemable preferred stock.
</FN>



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 21002]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9721]



[[Page 21002]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    the meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussion could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel, 05/2000 ZNS-1 SRB-W (03).
    Date: April 27, 2000.
    Time: 12 p.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: 6001 Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person:  Alan L. Willard, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, NINDS/NIH/DHHS, 
Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd. Suite 3208, MSC 9529, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-9529, 301-496-9223.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)


    Dated: April 11, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-9721 Filed 4-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Westell Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on their knowledge: 

 

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report. 

 

 

/s/ E. VAN CULLENS  

E. Van Cullens

Chief Executive Officer 

February 9, 2006

 

/s/NICHOLAS C. HINDMAN, Sr.

Nicholas C. Hindman, Sr.

Chief Financial Officer 

February 9, 2006

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Westell Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Westell Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
# Parole Processing

USCIS Parole Operations processes a variety of Form I-131 parole requests for individuals outside of the United States, including expedited processing for cases involving extremely urgent circumstances, settlement-related processing, and policy-related processing priorities. USCIS Parole Operations, therefore, does not categorically adjudicate these requests on a first-in, first out basis. Consequently, we are not able to post a standard processing time for this type of application.

We are currently receiving an extremely high number of requests for parole. While we try to process all requests for parole quickly and efficiently, petitioners should expect processing delays. It will take time for us to work through the unprecedented number of parole requests we have received since Fall 2021 and return to normal processing times. We are taking the necessary steps to return to target processing times as soon as possible.

**If you do not submit required evidence at the time of filing your parole request or if we need to ask you for additional information, it will take us longer to process your case.**

If you would like to voluntarily provide additional evidence to your case after reviewing the Guidance on Evidence for Certain Types of Humanitarian or Significant Public Benefit Parole Requests page, you may do so in your USCIS online account by selecting “Unsolicited Evidence.”  

If you filed your parole request by paper, you can use an “Online Access Code” to link your paper request to your USCIS online account. If you have questions about how to confirm your USCIS Online Account or to request that we reset your online access code, please visit How do I Get a New Online Access Code? or the USCIS Contact Center pages.

If you do not wish to provide additional evidence in your USCIS online account, you may also mail or email evidence to our office. Please see the mailing and email address listed on your Receipt of Request for Parole notice. We recommend providing evidence in your USCIS online account as it may take us longer to process evidence that is mailed or emailed to our office. 

12/15/2023

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
EXHIBIT 18.1









April 23, 2010
 
 Solutia Inc.
 575 Maryville Centre Drive
 St. Louis, Missouri 63166
 
 Dear Sirs/Madams:
 
 At your request, we have read the description included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to the Securities and Exchange Commission for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, of the facts relating to Solutia Inc.’s (the “Company”) change in accounting principle for inventories in the United States, excluding supplies, from the Last-In, First-Out (“LIFO”) method to the First-In, First-Out (“FIFO”) method. We believe, on the basis of the facts so set forth and other information furnished to us by appropriate officials of the Company, that the accounting change described in your Form 10-Q is to an alternative accounting principle that is preferable under the circumstances.
 
 We have not audited any consolidated financial statements of Solutia Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries as of any date or for any period subsequent to December 31, 2009. Therefore, we are unable to express, and we do not express, an opinion on the facts set forth in the above-mentioned Form 10-Q, on the related information furnished to us by officials of the Company, or on the financial position, results of operations, or cash flows of Solutia Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries as of any date or for any period subsequent to December 31, 2009.
 
 Yours truly,