alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Mark P. Mellin, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ILEX Oncology, Inc;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: July 30, 2004
/s/ MARK P. MELLINMark P. Mellin
(9 Misc. Rep. 200.)

#### KREISER v. SCOFIELD et al.

(City Court of New York, General Term.

June 20, 1894.)

Execution.

Every person who has anything to do with the wrongful issuance of an execution is liable to the person injured thereby.

Appeal from trial term.

Action by Samuel Kreiser against Cyrus Scofield and William G. McCrea. There was a judgment in favor of plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

Affirmed.

Argued before FITZSIMORS, REWBTJRGER, and CORLAR, JJ.

Wm. G. McCrea, for appellants.

Abram Kling, for respondent.

FITZSIMONS, J.

The order of the supreme court dated May 12, 1891, declared the body execution issued against plaintiff to be void and unlawful. Every person having anything to do with such a process is in law a wrongdoer, and liable for any damage done the injured person. There is testimony in the case showing that the defendant McCrea was one of the persons connected with the issuance of said execution; therefore he, and all others having anything to do with the issuance of said execution, were jointly and severally liable to plaintiff for any damage done him. The testimony also establishes that the defendant Scofield had to do with the issuance of said execution; thus his liability is also established. The judgment must be affirmed, with costs. All concur.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5813 

To designate additional segments and tributaries of White Clay Creek, in 

the States of Delaware and Pennsylvania, as a component of the National 

Wild and Scenic Rivers System. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 22, 2010 

Mr. PITTS (for himself and Mr. CASTLE) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To designate additional segments and tributaries of White 

Clay Creek, in the States of Delaware and Pennsylvania, 

as a component of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers 

System. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘White Clay Creek Wild 

5 and Scenic River Expansion Act of 2010’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5813 IH

1 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF SEGMENTS OF WHITE CLAY 

2 CREEK, AS SCENIC AND RECREATIONAL RIV3 ERS. 

4 Section 3(a)(163) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act 

5 (16 U.S.C. 1274(a)(163)) is amended— 

6 (1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A)— 

7 (A) by striking ‘‘190 miles’’ and inserting 

8 ‘‘199 miles’’; and 

9 (B) by striking ‘‘the recommended designa10 tion and classification maps (dated June 

11 2000)’’ and inserting ‘‘the map entitled ‘White 

12 Clay Creek Wild and Scenic River Designated 

13 Area Map’ and dated July 2008, the map enti14 tled ‘White Clay Creek Wild and Scenic River 

15 Classification Map’ and dated July 2008, and 

16 the map entitled ‘White Clay Creek National 

17 Wild and Scenic River Proposed Additional 

18 Designated Segments—July 2008’ ’’; 

19 (2) by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting 

20 the following: 

21 ‘‘(B) 22.4 miles of the east branch begin22 ning at the southern boundary line of the Bor23 ough of Avondale, including Walnut Run, 

24 Broad Run, and Egypt Run, outside the bound25 aries of the White Clay Creek Preserve, as a 

26 recreational river.’’; and 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5813 IH

1 (3) by striking subparagraph (H) and inserting 

2 the following: 

3 ‘‘(H) 14.3 miles of the main stem, includ4 ing Lamborn Run, that flow through the 

5 boundaries of the White Clay Creek Preserve, 

6 Pennsylvania and Delaware, and White Clay 

7 Creek State Park, Delaware beginning at the 

8 confluence of the east and middle branches in 

9 London Britain Township, Pennsylvania, down10 stream to the northern boundary line of the 

11 City of Newark, Delaware, as a scenic river.’’. 

12 SEC. 3. ADMINISTRATION OF WHITE CLAY CREEK. 

13 Sections 4 through 8 of Public Law 106–357 (16 

14 U.S.C. 1274 note; 114 Stat. 1393), shall be applicable to 

15 the additional segments of the White Clay Creek des16 ignated by the amendments made by section 2. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
# Encuentre una Oficina de USCIS

Antes de visitar una oficina de USCIS, usted debe tener una cita. Traiga la notificación impresa de su cita. Visite nuestra página web Estatus de Nuestras Oficinas para la información más reciente acerca de los cierres de nuestras oficinas.

## Para encontrar su oficina local de USCIS, por favor visite los siguientes enlaces:

                - Las oficinas locales  (en Estados Unidos) atienden las entrevistas programadas para solicitudes que no estén no relacionadas con asilo. También brindan información limitada y servicios al cliente con cita previa que complementan los servicios ofrecidos a través del sitio web y por teléfono.
                - Las Oficinas de Asilo  que atienden entrevistas programadas solo para asuntos relacionados con asilo.
                - Las oficinas internacionales  proporcionan servicios a ciudadanos estadounidenses, residentes permanentes de Estados Unidos y otras personas que visitan o residen fuera de Estados Unidos y que necesitan asistencia en asuntos de inmigración.
                - Los Centros de Asistencia en Solicitudes  proporcionan servicios de recopilación de servicios biométricos. 

## Otras oficinas de USCIS:

                - La Oficina de Apelaciones Administrativas  que decide sobre apelaciones de ciertos beneficios denegados
                - El Centro de Registros Nacionales  que recibe y procesa solicitudes de FOIA
                - Los Centros de Servicio y el Centro Nacional de Beneficios  que reciben y procesan una gran variedad de solicitudes y peticiones

03/12/2024

0 / 2000Para proteger su privacidad, por favor no incluya ninguna información personal en sus comentarios. Revise nuestra Política de Privacidad.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Harry E. Gruber, M.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of Kintera, Inc. (the "Registrant"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

|Dated: April 29, 2004                                                                                             |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/HARRY E. GRUBER, M.D.Harry E. Gruber, M.D. President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |  | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Kintera, Inc. and will be retained by
Kintera, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
**EXHIBIT31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, J. ChrisSteinhauser, certify that:

1.     Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of GeoPetro Resources Company;

2.     Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)   Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

(b)   Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)   Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)   Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)   Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date: May 3, 2007 | /s/ J. Chris Steinhauser                         |   |
|-------------------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
|              | J. Chris Steinhauser,  Chief Financial   Officer |

 

----
Skip to main content

Privacy Policy•Site map

# Nora Beth Dorsey

Nora Beth Dorsey was appointed Special Master of the United States Court of Federal Claims on January 14, 2013. She served as Chief Special Master from September 1, 2015-September 30, 2019.

She graduated from Winston-Salem State University with a B.S. in Nursing in 1979, and she received her J.D. in 1991 from the University of Georgia School of Law. Special Master Dorsey served from 2005 until her appointment as director of the civil litigation defense team of Hancock Daniel Johnson & Nagel, P.C. in Richmond, Virginia. Prior to 2005 she worked in various personal injury and medical malpractice law firms. She is admitted to the bars of the District of Columbia, Georgia, and Virginia, several U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, and the U.S. Supreme Court.

Howard T. Markey National Courts Building • 717 Madison Place, NW, Washington, DC 20439 • 202-357-6400
Certifications
I, Sukhbir Singh Mudan, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003, of Caneum, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c. Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business Issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting. 

5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 25, 2004
/s/ Sukhbir Singh Mudan
Amendment No.2 to Amended and Restated Severance Agreement



 Exhibit 10(d) 
 AMENDMENT No. 2 
 TO 
 ACUITY BRANDS, INC 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED SEVERANCE AGREEMENT 
 THIS AMENDMENT made and entered into as of the
30th day of March, 2010, by and between ACUITY BRANDS,
INC. (the “Company”) and MARK A. BLACK (“Executive”); 
 W I T N E S S E T H 
 WHEREAS, the Company and Executive entered into a Severance Agreement, dated as of November 19, 2008 (“Severance Agreement”),
providing for the payment of certain compensation and benefits to Executive if Executive’s employment is terminated under certain circumstances; and 
 WHEREAS, the parties now desire to amend the Severance Agreement in the manner hereinafter provided; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Severance Agreement is hereby amended, as follows: 
 1.

 Section 4.2 is hereby amended by deleting “135%” from clause (i) and substituting “65%” in lieu
thereof. 
 2. 
 This Amendment to the Severance Agreement shall be effective as of the date of this Amendment. Except as hereby modified, the Severance Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first above written. 
  

									
	EXECUTIVE	 		 	 COMPANY
  
 ACUITY BRANDS, INC.

				
	 /s/ Mark A. Black
	 		 	By:	 	/s/ Vernon J. Nagel
	MARK A. BLACK	 		 		 	 Vernon J. Nagel
 Chairman,
President and CEO
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is

not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-11196 (Summary Calendar)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus DAVID HENRY CAFFEY, Defendant-Appellant.

__________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:95-CR-117-Y(1)

__________________________________________

October 28, 1996 Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * David Henry Caffey appeals his convictions for attempt to possess with intent to distribute marijuana and conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) & 846. Caffey contends that the evidence was insufficient to support either conviction. Caffey also contends that the district court committed reversible error by failing toorder a psychiatric examination of Caffey to determine his competency to stand trial, or in the

alternative, to conduct a hearing to determine Caffey’s competence and that the district courtcommitted reversible error by sustaining the Government’s objection to Caffey’s crossexamination of Donald McCommons regarding McCommons’ pending state felony indictment for theft. We have reviewed the record and briefs and hold that no reversible error was committed. The evidence was sufficient for a reasonable jury to find Caffey guilty beyond a reasonable doubt on both offenses. See United States v. Resio-Trejo , 45 F.3d 907, 911 (5th Cir. 1995). Caffey’s trial counsel’s memorandum and argument were insufficient to raise a “bona fide doubt” as to Caffey’s competence. Accordingly, the district court did not abuse its discretion by failing to order a psychiatric examination, or by failing to conduct a competency hearing. See United States v. Davis , 61 F.3d 291, 304 (5th Cir. 1995). Because Caffey offered no evidence nor alleged that the government could influence the disposition of the state court proceedings againstMcCommons, the trial court did not violate Caffey’s constitutional rights by limiting his crossexamination of McCommons regarding an alleged pending state indictment. See United States v. Thorn , 917 F.2d 170, 175-76 (5th Cir. 1990). AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet and Statement of Income found on pages 3 & 4 of the
Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2000 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such consolidated financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          3,141
<SECURITIES>                                      102
<RECEIVABLES>                                  21,988
<ALLOWANCES>                                      127
<INVENTORY>                                    25,940
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               53,424
<PP&E>                                         50,049
<DEPRECIATION>                                  4,425
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                159,594
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          30,102
<BONDS>                                        90,771
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         1
<COMMON>                                            4
<OTHER-SE>                                     38,716
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  159,594
<SALES>                                        39,134
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               39,134
<CGS>                                          30,147
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  34,474
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   63
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              2,342
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 2,255
<INCOME-TAX>                                      993
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             1,262
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    1,262
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.26



</TABLE>