alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                                March 31, 1999


First National Bank of Chicago
One North State Street, 9th Floor
Chicago, IL 60602-0126
Attn: Corporate Trust Administration Department

Ambac Assurance Corporation
One State Street Plaza
New York, NY 10004
Attn: Structured Finance Department-MBS

Moody's Residential Loan Monitoring Group
4th Floor, 99 Church Street
New York, NY 10007

Standard & Poor's
26 Broadway
New York, NY 10004


     RE:  Headlands Home Equity Loan Trust (Series 1998-1);
          Annual Statement as to Compliance by the Master Servicer
          --------------------------------------------------------


Ladies and Gentlemen:


     Pursuant to Section 3.09 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement, with respect
to the above-referenced offering, the undersigned officer of Headlands Mortgage
Company in its capacity of Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement
hereby certifies as to the following:

     1.   a review of the activities of the Issuer and its performance under the
          Indenture during the preceding fiscal year since the inception of the
          trust has been made under the direct supervision of the undersigned
          officer; and

     2.   to the best knowledge of the undersigned officer, based on such
          review, the Issuer has fulfilled all of its material obligations under
          the Indenture throughout the applicable period, and there has been no
          known default in the fulfillment of the Issuer's material obligations
          throughout such period.


                                       8
<PAGE>

                                   Very truly yours
                                   HEADLANDS HOME EQUITY
                                   LOAN TRUST (Series 1998-1)

                                   By: HEADLANDS MORTGAGE COMPANY,
                                   as Servicer



                                   /s/ Gilbert J. MacQuarrie
                                   --------------------------
                                   Gilbert J. MacQuarrie
                                   Vice President, Treasurer and Secretary


                                       9
----

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Yilun Jin, the Chief Financial Officer andTreasurer of AMERICAN LORAIN CORPORATION (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFYthat: 

1. 

The Company’sAnnual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (the"Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. 

Informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operation of the Company. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed thisstatement this 29th day of April 2009. 

/s/ Yilun Jin                         Yilun JinChief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer) 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to American Lorain Corporation and will beretained by American Lorain Corporation and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

The forgoing certification is being furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission pursuant to §18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It isnot being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing ofthe Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of anygeneral incorporation language in such filing. 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

         In connection with the annual report of The Quantum Group, Inc.(the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ending October 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Donald B. Cohen , Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my
knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

           A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to The Quantum Group, Inc. and will be retained by The Quantum
Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

Signed on August 15, 2006

/s/ Donald B. Cohen
-------------------
DONALD B. COHEN
Chief Financial Officer of The Quantum Group, Inc.
EXHIBIT 12.1

   SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
                                     OFFICER

I, John A.A. James, President and Chief Executive Officer of Aurora Metals (BVI)
Limited, certify that:

1) I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Aurora Metals (BVI)
Limited;

2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

4) The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
     procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control
     over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this
     annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
     materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting;
     and

5) The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Company's auditors and the audit committee of the Company's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
     controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
     affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report
     financial information; and

     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control
     over financial reporting.


Date: June 25, 2007                    (s)John A.A. James
                                       ------------------
                                       John A.A. James
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Sammie Davis KING, Appellant v. Robert MOOSSY and Steven Harrell, Appellees.

No. 10-5381.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

July 7, 2011.

Sammie Davis King, Unadilla, GA, pro se.

Warden (Unadilla), Unadilla, GA, for Appellant.

BEFORE: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, and TATEL and GARLAND, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by the appellant. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

*12ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed November 4, 2010, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed appellant’s complaint, because a government official’s decision whether to investigate and prosecute a case is within the unreviewable discretion of the Executive Branch. *See, e.g., United States v. Nixon,*418 U.S. 683, 693, 94 S.Ct. 3090, 41 L.Ed.2d 1039 (1974); *Community for Creative Norir-Violence v. Pierce,*786 F.2d 1199, 1201 (D.C.Cir.1986). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for injunctive relief and temporary restraining order be dismissed as moot.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
#### Ivan Blair DAVIS, Appellant v. Thomas M. GAUBY, Sr.; Police Dept.; Linda K.M. Ludgate; John Doe, et al.; Kevin D. Gillespie, District Attorney Berks County; Kevin M. Beals, Public Defender.

No. 10-3955.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted for Possible Dismissal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) or Summary Action

Pursuant to Third Circuit LAE 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6 April 7, 2011.

Opinion filed: April 20, 2011.

Ivan Blair Davis, Somerset, PA, pro se.

Da Berks, Reading, PA, for Defender.

Present: SLOVITER, JORDAN and GREENAWAY, JR., Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Ivan Davis appeals in forma pauperis from an order dismissing his complaint and denying his request for counsel. We will dismiss this appeal as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).

In dismissing Davis’s complaint, the District Court observed that it “represented] the third action that plaintiff has filed within the past three months, with each action naming Thomas M. Gauby, Sr., Linda K.M. Ludgate, Kevin D. Gillespie, and Kevin M. Beals as defendants.” In *Davis v. Gauby,*408 Fed.Appx. 524 (3d Cir.2010) (per curiam), we analyzed one such suit, whose claims were identical to those currently before us: allegations of institutional abuse now barred by the statute of limitations, unclear references to bias and denial of due process, charges of judicial and prosecutorial misconduct, and habeas corpus arguments (such as ineffective assistance of counsel) — all haphazardly pleaded in a freewheeling style that assumed previous familiarity with the actors and events while equating conclusion with fact.1 At the time, we determined that Davis’s appeal was meritless. *Id.*408 Fed.Appx. at 526-27. In the interests of judicial economy, we decline to repeat today our analysis of his claims, and instead incorporate by reference our prior decision.2

Furthermore, we agree with the District Court that this suit shows Davis’s “lack of regard for the Court’s limited time and resources.” Accordingly, we will dismiss *78the appeal as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Davis’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied; to the extent that his other filings with this Court (many styled as “motions”) request independent relief, they are denied.

1

. *E.g.,*"The police have violated my due process I have the right by law to make a statement my 8th amendment was denied on the ground I had the right to press charges on the correctional officers who had assault battery me I was denied my rights by the police officer who never investigation on the case racist discrimination play big part in this case.” 9/20/2010 Statement 3, ECF No. 5.

2

. To the extent that Davis raised one *new*claim' — an access-to-the-courts charge, predicated at least partly on interference with his legal mail — he asserted it for the first time on appeal; hence, we decline to address it. *Harris v. City of Phila.,*35 F.3d 840, 845 (3d Cir.1994) ("This court has consistently held that it will not consider issues that are raised for the first time on appeal.”).
Exhibit 11.1

                        CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
                        Computation of Earnings Per Share
                                   (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     Three Months Ended                 Nine months ended
                                              September 30,     September 30,    September 30,     September 30,
                                                  1997              1996             1997               1996
                                              -----------       -----------       -----------       -----------
<S>                                           <C>               <C>               <C>               <C>         
Net loss                                      ($1,448,844)      ($1,311,454)      ($2,874,008)      ($3,749,452)
                                              ===========       ===========       ===========       ===========

Weighted average number of
    shares outstanding                          6,733,452         6,570,287         6,725,959         6,555,948
                                              -----------       -----------       -----------       -----------

Loss per share                                ($     0.22)      ($     0.20)      ($     0.43)      ($     0.57)
                                              ===========       ===========       ===========       ===========


Net loss                                      ($1,448,844)      ($1,311,454)      ($2,874,008)      ($3,749,452)

Weighted average shares:

   Common shares outstanding                    6,733,452         6,570,287         6,725,959         6,555,948

Dilutive effect stock options & warrants               --                --                --                --
                                              -----------       -----------       -----------       -----------

Total shares                                    6,733,452         6,570,287         6,725,959         6,555,948

Diluted loss per share                        ($     0.22)      ($     0.20)      ($     0.43)      ($     0.57)
                                              ===========       ===========       ===========       ===========
</TABLE>
#### MENKEN *v.*ATLANTA.

ERROR' TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP GEORGIA.

*No.*674.

Decided April 18, 1889.

The death of the accused in a criminal case brought here by writ of error abates the suit.

The case is stated in the opinion.

*Mr. Hoke Smith*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. S. W. Packard*for defendant in error.

Per curiam:

The death of Fritz Menken, the plaintiff in error in the cause having been suggested by *Mr. Pope Barrow,*in behalf of *Mr. Hoke Smith*of counsel for the said plaintiff in error, and it appearing to the court that this is a criminal case, it is considered by the court that this cause has abated. Therefore, it is ordered and adjudged by the court that the writ of error in this cause be, and the same is hereby,

*Dismissed.*
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 174 (Monday, September 13, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50926-50927]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19656]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #17125 and #17126; Tennessee Disaster Number TN-
00131]


Presidential Declaration of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of Tennessee

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Tennessee (FEMA-
4609-DR), dated 09/01/2021.
    Incident: Severe Storm and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 08/21/2021.

DATES: Issued on 09/01/2021.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/01/2021.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/01/2022.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 09/01/2021, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:


[[Page 50927]]


Primary Counties: Dickson, Hickman, Houston, Humphreys

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere...      2.000
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.000
For Economic Injury:
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 17125 6 
and for economic injury is 17126 0.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2021-19656 Filed 9-10-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
# USCIS Issues Policy Guidance Regarding the 2-Year Foreign Residence Requirement for the J Nonimmigrant Classification

10/24/2023

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is issuing policy guidance (PDF, 275.62 KB) in the USCIS Policy Manual regarding the 2-year foreign residence requirement for the nonimmigrant exchange visitor (J) classification.

The update adds information about how USCIS determines whether the requirement has been met, the evidence a benefit requestor may submit to show compliance with the requirement, and how it considers situations in which it is effectively impossible for the benefit requestor to satisfy the requirement.

It also corrects an omission, from existing Policy Manual content, of one of the foreign medical graduates’ grounds for waivers of the foreign residence requirement. This update includes the ground and clarifies employment requirements.

The guidance is effective immediately on publication.

The J-1 nonimmigrant classification is for exchange visitors who intend to participate in an approved program in the United States for the purpose of teaching, instructing or lecturing, studying, observing, conducting research, consulting, demonstrating special skills, receiving training, or receiving graduate medical education or training.

For more information, see the Policy Alert (PDF, 275.62 KB).

10/24/2023

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 96-10497 Conference Calendar

__________________ FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus PACIFIC MEDICAL CLINICS MANAGEMENT, INC., Defendant, JAMES NORMAN WELLS, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:96-MC-33-T
- - - - - - - - - - June 28, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * This court must examine the basis for its jurisdiction on its own motion if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby , 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). James Norman Wells appeals the denial of a motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum . The magistrate judge denied this motion, and Wells failed to appeal the ruling to theNo. 96-10497 -2- district court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). Therefore, we lack jurisdiction to consider the issue. See Colburn v. Bunge Towing, Inc. , 883 F.2d 372, 379 (5th Cir. 1989). APPEAL DISMISSED.
Exhibit 13.1

CHINA MOBILE LIMITED

Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned, LI Yue, Executive Director and Chief Executive Officer of China Mobile Limited (the
Company), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 25, 2014



/s/ LI YueName:

LI YueTitle:

Executive Director and Chief Executive Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### In re MOSELY.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

April, 1896.)

Proceeding for the examination of David E. Mosely, third person in the proceedings sup*1124plementary to execution in an action entitled “George G. Haines against John F. Dorthy.”

No opinion. Order affirmed, with costs against the appellant.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

DANTE DILLARD,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Appellee.

§

§ 

§ No. 92, 2022

§

§ Court Below: Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ Cr. ID No. 1105015873 

§ 

§

Submitted: June 7, 2022

Decided: June 27, 2022

O R D E R

(1) The appellant filed a notice of appeal from a Superior Court order 

denying his motion for postconviction relief. The Court issued a briefing schedule

on March 17, 2022; the appellant’s opening brief was due May 3, 2022. The 

appellant did not file an opening brief by the deadline, and on May 4, 2022, Court 

staff sent a brief delinquency letter to the appellant.

(2) On May 24, 2022, the Chief Deputy Clerk issued a notice, sent by 

certified mail, directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be 

dismissed for his failure to file an opening brief. On May 31, 2022, the Court 

received the certified mail receipt indicating that the notice to show cause had been 

delivered; postal records confirm that the notice to show cause was delivered on May 

27, 2022. 
2

(3) The appellant having failed to respond to the notice to show cause or to 

file the opening brief, dismissal of this action is deemed unopposed. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2)

and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr.

Justice