alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Paulo Arturo OROZCO-FUENTES, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-71033.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 28, 2011.

Paulo Arturo Orozco-Fuentes, Lake Elsinore, CA, pro se.

John Beadle Holt, Esquire, Trial, OIL, John Clifford Cunningham, I, Esquire, Senior Litigation, District Counsel, Esquire, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. LeFevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Paulo Arturo Orozco-Fuentes, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s *(“13”)*decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings and review its legal conclusions de novo. *Santos-Lemus v. Mukasey,*542 F.3d 738, 742 (9th Cir.2008). We deny the petition for review.

Orozco-Fuentes testified that he resisted the guerrillas’ and Guatemalan army’s attempts to recruit him. Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s denial of asylum because Orozco-Fuentes failed to establish past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution on account of a protected ground. *See INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 481-82, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992) (forced recruitment by guerrillas, without more, does not amount to persecution); *Pedro-Mateo v. INS,*224 F.3d 1147, 1150-51 (9th Cir.2000) (attempts by military and guerillas to recruit Guatemalan not persecution absent evidence of discriminatory purpose).

We lack jurisdiction to consider OrozcoFuentes’ request for humanitarian relief because he did not raise this claim to the IJ or BIA. *See Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir.2004).

Because Orozco-Fuentes failed to establish his eligibility for asylum, he neces*720sarily fails to meet the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. *See Zehatye v. Gonzales,*453 F.3d 1182, 1190 (9th Cir.2006).

Finally, substantial evidence supports the IJ’s denial of CAT relief because Orozco-Fuentes failed to establish it is more likely than not he will be tortured if returned to Guatemala. *See Nahrvani v. Gonzales,*399 F.3d 1148, 1154 (9th Cir. 2005).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

[]}IITED STATES COAST GUARD

Complainant

vs.

JOSEPH THOMAS FLORES

Respondent

Docket Number 2023 -0 | 44

Enforcement Activity No. 7345676

CONSENT ORDER

Issued: June 6. 2023

Bv Administrative Law Judse: Honorable Timothv G. Stueve

Appearances:

Eric Bauer

Jennifer Mehaffey, Esq.

USCG S&R National Center of Expertise

I'or the Coast Guard

Scott Gunst, Jr., Esq.

For Respondent
CONSENT ORDER APPRO VING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

On or about June 1,2023, the parlies in this case submitted a Motion for Approval of

Settlement Agreement and Entry ofConsent Order to be approved as a settlement ofthe case

under 33 C.F.R. $ 20.502.

I have carefully reviewed the terms of the Settlement Agreement and find it is fair and

reasonable and in substantial compliance with the requirements of 33 C.F.R. $ 20.502.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the record, it is hereby ORDERED, the Settlement Agreement is

APPROVED in full and incorporated herein by reference. This Consent Order shall constitute

full, final, and complete adjudication of this proceeding.

Done and dated June 6, 2023, at

Alameda, California

Timothy G. Stueve

Administrative Law Judge

U.S. Coast Guard
EXHIBIT 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     I, Michael L. Hirschey state and attest that:

     (1) I am the Chief Executive Officer of OneSource  Technologies,  Inc. (the
"issuer").

     (2) Accompanying  this  certification is the Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2002,  an annual report (the "annual  report")  filed by the issuer
with the Securities  Exchange  Commission  pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934  (the  "Exchange  Act"),  which  contains
financial statements.

     (3) I hereby  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted
pursuant  to Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that based on my
knowledge:

          A. the periodic  report  containing  the  financial  statements  fully
     complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange
     Act, and

          B. the information  contained in the periodic report fairly  presents,
     in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
     of the issuer for the periods presented therein.


/s/ Michael L. Hirschey
-----------------------
Michael L. Hirschey
Chief Executive Officer

Date: 26 March 2003
ex10-7.htm


    Exhibit
10.7

    


    


    Director
Fee Arrangements for 2010

    


     

    Each
director of Sound Financial, Inc. (the “Company”) also is a director of Sound
Community Bank (the “Bank”).  For 2010, each non-employee director
will receive an annual fee of $12,000, plus a meeting fee of $1,030 for each
Board Meeting attended for serving on the Company’s Board of
Directors.  Directors are not compensated for their service on the
Company’s Board of Directors.
#### Alliance Property Management and Development v Andrews Avenue Equities, Inc.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted, as indicated; and insofar as it seeks a stay, the motion is denied, with leave to reapply to the Court of Appeals, as indicated. Concur—Sandler, J. P., Carro, Milonas, Rosenberger and Smith, JJ.
# FY 2010 Grant Recipients

#### Archived Content

The information on this page is out of date. However, some of the content may still be useful, so we have archived the page.

## FY 2010 Citizenship and Integration Grant Program Award Recipients

In FY 2010, USCIS awarded approximately $8.1 million in grants to 78 organizations. The performance period varied in duration between October 1, 2010 and September 30, 2012.

For more information, please see the FY 2010 individual program descriptions  (PDF, 260.43 KB).

### National Capacity Building Grant Program

### 

### Direct Services Grant Program

10/01/2011

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
EXHIBIT 32.1





                             AMERICAN SKIING COMPANY


                  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Skiing Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 26, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
J. Fair, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of the Company.


Date:  December 10, 2003

                                         By:   /s/ William J. Fair
                                         --------------------------------
                                         William J. Fair
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer
                                         (Principal Executive Officer)






         This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except
to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange
Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange
Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by
reference.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 21016]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9743]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under The Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

    Notice is hereby given that on March 14, 2000, a complaint and a 
proposed consent decree in United States and the State of Colorado v. 
Beazer East, Inc. and Butala Construction Company, Civil Action No. 00-
561, were lodged with the United States District Court for the District 
of Colorado.
    In this action, the United States seeks recovery of approximately 
$631,000 in unreimbursed response costs incurred in relation to 
Operable Unit #2 of the Smeltertown Superfund Site, located near 
Salida, Colorado, under Section 107(a) of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act. The State of 
Colorado seeks recovery of response costs to be incurred at the Site. 
Under the proposed decree, the defendants will implement a remedial 
action selected by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, 
which is designed to prevent the further migration of hazardous 
substances at Operable Unit #2, and will reimburse all of EPA's past 
costs, as well as all of EPA's and the State of Colorado's future 
response costs incurred at Operable Unit #2.
    The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication comments relating to the 
proposed consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General of the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20530, and should refer to United 
States and State of Colorado v. Beazer East, Inc. and Butala 
Construction Company, D.J. Ref. 90-11-3-1522.
    The propose consent decrees may be examined at the Office of the 
United States Attorney, 1961 Stout Street, 11th Floor, Drawer 3608, 
Denver, CO 80294; at U.S. EPA Region VIII, 999 18th Street, Denver, 
Colorado 80202; and at the Consent Decree Library, P.O. U.S. Department 
of Justice, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611. In requesting a 
copy, please enclose a check in the amount of $20.00 (25 cents per page 
reproduction cost) payable to the Consent Decree Library.

Joel M. Gross,
Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 00-9743 Filed 4-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual report of Global Realty Development Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Robert Kohn, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(3)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(4)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.











Date:  May
      16, 2008
            By:/s/Robert
      KohnRobert
      KohnChief
      Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5697 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5697

 To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to prohibit leasing in 
                   the North Atlantic Planning Area.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 1, 2010

 Mr. Markey of Massachusetts (for himself, Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, 
 Mr. Olver, Mr. Hodes, Ms. Shea-Porter, Mr. Delahunt, Mr. Capuano, Mr. 
Lynch, Mr. McGovern, Ms. Pingree of Maine, and Ms. DeLauro) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to prohibit leasing in 
                   the North Atlantic Planning Area.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON OFFSHORE OIL AND GAS LEASING IN THE NORTH 
              ATLANTIC PLANNING AREA.

    Section 8(a) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 
1337(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(9) The Secretary may not issue any oil and gas lease under this 
Act for any submerged lands in the North Atlantic Planning Area, as 
such area is designated on June 18, 2010.''.
                                 <all>
```
ex_10-50.htm


    EXHIBIT
10.50

    


    March 26,
2010

    


    Dr.
Gerald Burnett

    202
Camino Al Lago

    Atherton,
CA 94027

    


    


    Avistar
Communications Corporation

    1875
South Grant Street, 10th
Floor

    San
Mateo, CA 94112

    


    


    To Whom
It May Concern:

    


    If
needed, I, Dr. Gerald Burnett, will fund Avistar Communications Corporation
(“Avistar”) thru March 31, 2011, with the same mechanism and terms that
currently secures Avistar’s existing $5.0 million revolving line of credit that
terminates on December 21, 2010, up to a total dollar amount of $7.0
million.

    


    


    


    /s/ Gerald J.
Burnett                        


    Dr.
Gerald Burnett
Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Alexandria Phillips, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Advanced Engine
Technologies, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report; and

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

(c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.


Date: November 14, 2003                     /s/    ALEXANDRIA PHILLIPS
                                              Alexandria Phillips, Treasurer
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 MARVIN BROWN,

3 Plaintiff-Appellant,

4 v. No. 29,190 

5 STANLEY MOYA, JAMES LOPEZ

6 DWAYNE SANTISTEVAN, CARLOS

7 VALDEZ, DAVID VIGIL, RAY TRUJILLO,

8 T.H. HAMMONTRE, CELESTE V. CASIAS,

9 MIKE FLORES, KEM HEULSKAMP, and

10 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL,

11 Defendants-Appellees.

12 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY

13 Daniel A. Sanchez, District Judge

14 Marvin Brown

15 Santa Fe, NM

16 Pro Se Appellant

17 Jim Brewster, General Counsel

18 Diana J. Harris, Deputy General Counsel

19 Santa Fe, NM

20 for Appellees

21 MEMORANDUM OPINION

22 KENNEDY, Judge.

23 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of
2

1 proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed,

2 and the time for doing so has expired.

3 AFFIRMED.

4 IT IS SO ORDERED.

5 ___________________________________

6 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge

7 WE CONCUR:

8 ___________________________

9 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge

10 ___________________________

11 ROBERT E. ROBLES, Judge
Third Department,

August 4,1987

(August 4, 1987)

#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Nasar Abdul Aziz, Also Known as Raymond Gilliard, Petitioner, v Eugene LeFevre, as Superintendent of Clinton Correctional Facility, Respondent.

Application, pursuant to CPLR 7002 (b) (2), for writ of habeas corpus denied *(see, People ex rel. Davis v Coombe,*97 AD2d 667). Kane, J. P., Main, Casey, Weiss and Mikoll, JJ., concur.
#### VILLAGE OF CANANDAIGUA, Respondent, v. BENEDICT, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 16, 1896.)

Action by the village of Canandaigua, by its board of water commissioners, against Robert M. Benedict, impleaded, etc.

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs. All concur. See 40 N. Y. Supp. 707.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Southern Copper Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, JoseN. Chirinos, Comptroller and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Jose N. Chirinos                      |
|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|   |      Jose N. Chirinos |
|   | Comptroller and Chief Financial Officer   |

 

October31, 2007

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by section 906 has beenprovided to Southern Copper Corporation and will be retained by Southern CopperCorporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

1

----
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2021432EN.01000801.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 26.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 432/8 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10510 – Apollo Management/K1 Group)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 432/06)

1.

On 18 October 2021, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2021432EN.01000801-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Apollo Management, L.P. (‘Apollo’, USA), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | K1 Group S.A.S.U. (‘K1 Group’, France). |

Apollo acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of K1 Group.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for Apollo: portfolio investments, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for K1 Group: manufacture of chemicals and chemical products and manufacture of basic chemicals, fertilisers and nitrogen compounds, plastics and synthetic rubber in primary forms. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2021432EN.01000801-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10510 – Apollo Management/K1 Group

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2021432EN.01000801-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2021432EN.01000801-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---