alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 569 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 569

To amend titles 28 and 10, United States Code, to allow for certiorari 
 review of certain cases denied relief or review by the United States 
                 Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 15, 2009

   Mrs. Davis of California (for herself, Mr. Skelton, Mr. Holt, Ms. 
Bordallo, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Loebsack, Mr. Hinchey, Ms. Woolsey, and Mr. 
Scott of Virginia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend titles 28 and 10, United States Code, to allow for certiorari 
 review of certain cases denied relief or review by the United States 
                 Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Equal Justice for Our Military Act 
of 2009''.

SEC. 2. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED 
              FORCES.

    (a) In General.--Section 1259 of title 28, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in paragraph (3), by inserting ``or denied'' after 
        ``granted''; and
            (2) in paragraph (4), by inserting ``or denied'' after 
        ``granted''.
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.--Section 867a(a) of title 
10, United States Code, is amended by striking ``The Supreme Court may 
not review by a writ of certiorari under this section any action of the 
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces in refusing to grant a petition 
for review.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Sims v. The State.

Appeal from Lawrence Circuit Court.

Tried before the Hon. H. C. Speaks.

James Jackson, for appellant.

Charles G. Brown, Attorney-General, for the State.

*673Opinion by

Haralson, J.

*672The appellant was indicted, tried and convicted for murder, and sentenced to the penitentiary for life. After the admission in evidence of a confession made by the defendant, the defendant proposed to ask the witness testifying to such confession, if at the time the alleged confession was made the mob was surrounding the calaboose where the defendant was imprisoned, or in the town near the calaboose for the purpose of .lynching the defendant, and whether said mobwaswithin the defendant’s view. The court sustained the objection of the solicitor to the question seeking to elicit such testimony. On this appeal it is held that the court erred in this ruling ; it being said that “If such a mob had been assemb*673ling as the question implies it Avas, it Avas competent to prove that fact as tending to sIioav the state of mind and alarm under Avliich the confession Avas made, and that it AAas not voluntary. — 3 Brick. Dig. 285, § § 543-545.”

The judgment of conviction is reversed and the cause remanded.
1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

_________________________________

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD,

Complainant,

vs.

AUSTIN LEE THOMPSON,

Respondent.

_________________________________

Docket Number 2023-0466

CG Enforcement Activity Number 7831247

CONSENT ORDER

Issued: January 4, 2024

By: Honorable George J. Jordan, Administrative Law Judge

Appearances:

CWO Wayne Bush 

Sector Key West

For the Coast Guard

Austin Lee Thompson, Pro se

For the Respondent
2

CONSENT ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

On December 15, 2023, the parties in this case submitted a Motion for Approval of 

Settlement Agreement and Entry of Consent Order to be approved as a settlement of the case 

under 33 C.F.R. § 20.502.

I have carefully reviewed the terms of the Settlement Agreement and find it is fair and 

reasonable and in substantial compliance with the requirements of 33 C.F.R. § 20.502.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the record, it is hereby ORDERED, the Settlement Agreement is 

APPROVED in full and incorporated herein by reference. This Consent Order shall constitute 

full, final, and complete adjudication of this proceeding.

SO ORDERED.

Done and dated January 4, 2024,

Seattle, Washington 

_______________________________

George J. Jordan

Administrative Law Judge

United States Coast Guard
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of ImproveNet, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), for the quarterly period ended June 30,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report") I, Jeffrey I. Rassas, Co-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section
            78m(a) or 78o(d)): and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

ImproveNet, Inc.

/s/ Jeffrey I. Rassas
-----------------------
Jeffrey I. Rassas
Co-Chairman and CEO

Dated: August 18, 2003
#               I-945, Public Charge Bond

If we determine that an applicant is inadmissible based on the public charge ground, but is otherwise admissible, the applicant may be admitted in the discretion of the secretary of homeland security after posting a suitable and proper bond. Before an applicant may post a public charge bond (on Form I-945), we must invite them to do so. The public charge bond is posted as security for performance and fulfillment of the financial obligations of a bonded noncitizen to the U.S. government.

 For more information about public charge bonds, please see the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 8, Part G, Public Charge Ground of Inadmissibility.

## Forms and Document Downloads

Form I-945  (PDF, 433.1 KB)

Instructions for Form I-945  (PDF, 247.82 KB)

## Form Details

12/23/22. You can find the edition date at the bottom of the page on the form and instructions.

Dates are listed in mm/dd/yy format.

If you complete and print this form to mail it, make sure that the form edition date and page numbers are visible at the bottom of all pages and that all pages are from the same form edition. If any of the form’s pages are missing or are from a different form edition, we may reject your form.

If you need help downloading and printing forms, read our instructions. 

Unless otherwise specified in your notice from USCIS, mail your form to:

USCISAttn: Form I-94510 Application WayMontclair, CA 91763-1350

Only use this form if we:
                    - Determined you were inadmissible on the public charge grounds (INA 212(a)(4)); and
                    - Notified you that you may submit a public charge bond.

We will reject this form if we have not notified you that you may submit a public charge bond.

You can find the filing fee for Form I-945 by visiting our Fee Schedule page.  

**Filing Tips:** Review our Tips for Filing Forms by Mail page for information on how to ensure we will accept your form.

**Don’t forget to sign your form.** We will reject any unsigned form.

When you submit your Form I-945, you must:
                    - Include a copy of the communication from USCIS that tells you to submit the form; and
                    - Submit the amount specified in that communication for the required cash or surety bond.

If you do not include the communication and the specified cash or surety bond amount, we will reject your Form I-945.

                      - Public Charge
                      - Public Charge Resources
                      - Public Charge Ground of Inadmissibility Final Rule 2022
                      - USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 8, Part G, Public Charge Ground of Inadmissibility

04/03/2024

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
(8 Misc. Rep. 503.)

#### WEBBER v. GOTTHOLD.

(City Court of New York, General Term.

May 18, 1894.)

Negotiable Instruments—Notice of Protest.

Where an indorser does not indicate under the indorsement any place to which notice of protest should be sent, it is sufficient to direct the notice to the city in which the indorser resides.

Appeal from trial term.

Action by Edward Webber against Eugene S. Gotthold. There was a judgment in favor of plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Argued before EHRLICH, C. J., and VAN WYCK and McCARTHY, JJ.

Henry Cooper, for appellant.

H. F. Lawrence, for respondent.

EHRLICH, C. J.

The making and indorsing of the note having been clearly established, the only question to be considered is as to the service of notice of protest on Mrs. Cotes, the appellant. The notice was addressed to Mrs. Cotes at Hew York City, duly mailed by depositing the same in the general post office and prepaying the postage. The note was drawn at Hew York City, dated there, and made payable there, and the appellant resided at that place at 1he time. The defendant, as indorser, not having indicated under her indorsement any specific place to which the notice should be sent, the law was sufficiently complied with by directing it to the city in which she resided. As the proof of service of the notice answers all legal requirements, there being no error in the rulings, the judgment appealed from must be affirmed, with costs. All concur.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Westell Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on their knowledge: 

(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report. 

| /s/ E. VAN CULLENS          |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|
| E. Van Cullens              |   |
| Chief Executive Officer     |   |
| November 9, 2006            |   |
|                        |   |
| /s/NICHOLAS C. HINDMAN, Sr. |   |
| Nicholas C. Hindman, Sr.    |   |
| Chief Financial Officer     |   |
| November 9, 2006            |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Westell Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Westell Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 3291] 

Pursuant to section 2(b)(1)(B) of the Export-Import Bank Act of 1945, as amended, and Executive Order 12166 of October 19, 1979, the determination dated December 21, 1999, with respect to Export-Import Bank financing in connection with cases APO70202XX and APO67280XX is hereby revoked. 

                    This determination shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                 

Dated: March 31, 2000. 

Madeleine K. Albright, 

Secretary of State, U.S. Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 00-9730 Filed 4-18-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-23-P
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 74 (Monday, April 17, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 20380-20381]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9402]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

49 CFR Parts 209 and 230

[FRA Docket No. RSSL-98-1, Notice No. 4]


Inspection and Maintenance Standards for Steam Locomotives

AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Public meetings on final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On November 17, 1999, FRA published the final rule on 
inspection and maintenance of steam locomotives (64 FR 62828). The 
Inspection and

[[Page 20381]]

Maintenance Standards for Steam Locomotives, title 49, Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR) parts 209 and 230, which took effect on January 18, 
2000, sets forth new inspection and implementation requirements. FRA 
will hold public meetings to explain the implementation schedule and 
general requirements for inspection and maintenance of steam 
locomotives under the rule. These meetings will also provide interested 
parties with the opportunity to discuss the rule and ask questions of 
the presenters. All parties interested in the new rule on inspection 
and maintenance of steam locomotives are invited to attend these 
meetings.

DATES: The meetings will be held on April 26, 2000, at 9 a.m.; May 17, 
2000, at 9 a.m.; and June 28, 2000, at 9 am.

ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held on April 26, 2000, at the 
Steamtown National Historic Site, Lackwana & Cliff Street, Scranton, PA 
18503; May 17, 2000 at the California State Railroad Museum, 111 I 
Street, Sacramento, CA 95814; and June 28, 2000 at the Clarion Hotel, 
4813 Central Avenue, Hot Springs, AR 71913.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George Scerbo, Motive Power & 
Equipment Specialist, Office of Safety, FRA, 1120 Vermont Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20590 (telephone 202-493-6249); or Paul F. Byrnes, Trial 
Attorney, Office of Chief Counsel, FRA, 1120 Vermont Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20590 (202-493-6032).

Michael J. Logue,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Compliance and Program 
Implementation.
[FR Doc. 00-9402 Filed 4-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 302



I, John E. McNulty,
certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Secure Computing
Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;



c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|/s/    John E. McNulty              
|------------------------------------
|John E. McNulty                     
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|October 31, 2003
# Official Journal L 349/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 349 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5921 December 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 349

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5921 December 2016

---

| Contents | | Corrigenda | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Corrigendum to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, amending and repealing Directives 67/548/EEC and 1999/45/EC, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 ( OJ L 353, 31.12.2008 ) | 1 |
| | * | Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on improving securities settlement in the European Union and on central securities depositories and amending Directives 98/26/EC and 2014/65/EU and Regulation (EU) No 236/2012 ( OJ L 257, 28.8.2014 ) | 8 |
| | * | Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2015/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 on insolvency proceedings ( OJ L 141, 5.6.2015 ) | 9 |

Contents

Corrigenda

page

*

Corrigendum to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, amending and repealing Directives 67/548/EEC and 1999/45/EC, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 ( OJ L 353, 31.12.2008 )

( OJ L 353, 31.12.2008 )

1

*

Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on improving securities settlement in the European Union and on central securities depositories and amending Directives 98/26/EC and 2014/65/EU and Regulation (EU) No 236/2012 ( OJ L 257, 28.8.2014 )

( OJ L 257, 28.8.2014 )

8

*

Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2015/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 on insolvency proceedings ( OJ L 141, 5.6.2015 )

( OJ L 141, 5.6.2015 )

9

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2460 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the 

provision of adult day health care services for veterans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2460 EH

1 SECTION 1. PROVISION OF ADULT DAY HEALTH CARE 

2 SERVICES FOR VETERANS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1745 of title 38, United 

4 States Code, is amended— 

5 (1) by adding at the end the following new sub6 section: 

7 ‘‘(d)(1) The Secretary shall enter into an agreement 

8 under section 1720(c)(1) of this title or a contract with 

9 each State home for payment by the Secretary for adult 

10 day health care provided to a veteran who is eligible for, 

11 but does not receive, nursing home care pursuant to sub12 section (a). 

13 ‘‘(2) Payment under each agreement or contract be14 tween the Secretary and a State home under paragraph 

15 (1) for each veteran who receives care under such para16 graph shall be made at a rate that is equal to 65 percent 

17 of the payment that the Secretary would pay to the State 

18 home pursuant to subsection (a)(2) if the veteran received 

19 nursing home care under subsection (a) rather than under 

20 paragraph (1) of this subsection. 

21 ‘‘(3) Payment by the Secretary under paragraph (1) 

22 to a State home for adult day health care provided to a 

23 veteran described in that paragraph constitutes payment 

24 in full to the State home for such care furnished to that 

25 veteran.’’; and 
3 

•HR 2460 EH

1 (2) in the heading, by inserting ‘‘, adult day 

2 health care,’’ after ‘‘home care’’. 

3 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

4 at the beginning of chapter 17 of such title is amended 

5 by striking the item relating to section 1745 and inserting 

6 the following new item: 

‘‘1745. Nursing home care, adult day health care, and medications for veterans 

with service-connected disabilities.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 23, 2016. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2460 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve 

veterans. the provision of adult day health care services for