alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Lakeside Village Homeowners

Association, Inc., Principal Management

Group of North Texas, and Principal

Management Group, Inc.

,

Appellant s

,

v.

Alfred "Corky" Belanger and Michael

Drennan

,

Appellee

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 5

- 00 214

- C V

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 3

of Dallas C ounty, Texas

(TC# CC

- 11

- 07783

- C )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appell ants ’ third motion for extension of time within which to

file the brief until November 9 , 2015. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF

TIME TO F ILE THE APPELL ANTS ’ B R IEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Dawn Woelfel Hansen, the Appell ants ’ attorney,

prepare the Appell ants ’ brief and forward the same to this Court on or before November 9 , 2015

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 2 2 nd day of October , 20 1 5

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Hughes , JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 10 (Friday, January 14, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 2375]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-956]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 011100B]


Submission for OMB Review; Proposed Infomation Collection; 
Request for Comments

    The Department of Commerce (DOC) has submitted to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for 
collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork 
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
    Title: Commercial Harvesters and Recreational Party and Charter 
Boat Socio-cultural and Economic Data Collection Pilot Study.
    OMB Approval Number: None.
    Agency Form Number: None.
    Type of Request: New Collection.
    Burden Hours: 793 hours.
    Number of Respondents: 323 (but multiple responses).
    Average Hours Per Response: Ranges between 15 and 20 minutes 
depending on the requirement.
    Needs and Uses: This information collection will request social, 
economic and cultural information from fishing enterprises affected by 
the management of federal commercial fisheries on the east coast. This 
pilot study will determine the best and most efficient ways to collect 
data to ensure that national goals, objectives and requirements of the 
Magnuson-Stevens Act are met. The information is vital in assessing the 
economic and social effects of fishery management decisions and 
regulations on fishing enterprises.
    Affected Public: Businesses or other for-profit organizations, 
individuals.
    Frequency: Quarterly, semi-annually.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker, (202) 395-3897.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Linda Engelmeier, DOC Forms Clearance Officer, 
(202) 482-3272, Department of Commerce, Room 5027, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at 
LE<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2a444d4f46474f6a4e4549044d455c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f69891939a9b93b6929995d8919980">[email protected]</span></a>).
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, Room 10202, New Executive Office 
Building, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20503.

    Dated: January 6, 2000.
Linda Engelmeier,
Departmental Forms Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief Information 
Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-956 Filed 1-13-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 13.1

CHINA MOBILE LIMITED

Certification

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned, LI Yue, Executive Director and Chief Executive Officer of China Mobile Limited (the Company), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:
April 27, 2017



/s/ LI YueName:

LI YueTitle:

Executive Director and Chief Executive Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being
filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5732 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to permit coverage of 

certain covered part D drugs for uses that are determined to be for 

medically accepted indications based upon clinical evidence in peer reviewed medical literature. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 14, 2010 

Ms. KILROY (for herself, Mr. THORNBERRY, and Mr. BURGESS) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for 

a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 

consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to permit 

coverage of certain covered part D drugs for uses that 

are determined to be for medically accepted indications 

based upon clinical evidence in peer reviewed medical 

literature. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Part D Off-Label Pre5 scription Parity Act’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5732 IH

1 SEC. 2. REVISED DEFINITION OF MEDICALLY ACCEPTED IN2 DICATION FOR MEDICARE COVERED PART D 

3 DRUGS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1860D–2(e)(4) of the So5 cial Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–102(e)(4)) is amend6 ed by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

7 ‘‘(D) CLARIFICATION.—Notwithstanding 

8 subparagraph (A)(ii), none of the provisions of 

9 this subsection shall prevent a PDP sponsor of10 fering a prescription drug plan or an MA orga11 nization offering an MA–PD plan from deter12 mining (whether through a determination, re13 consideration of such a determination, or an ap14 peal of such a determination under section 

15 1852(g) or subsection (g) or (h) of section 

16 1860D–4, as applicable) that a use of a covered 

17 part D drug is for a medically accepted indica18 tion for purposes of coverage of such drug 

19 under such plan if such determination is based 

20 upon guidance provided by the Secretary for de21 termining accepted uses of covered part D 

22 drugs and on supportive clinical evidence in 

23 peer reviewed medical literature.’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5732 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply to plan years beginning on or after 

3 January 1, 2011. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
(September 10, 1987)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Louis Joseph Capozzi, Jr., Appellant.

Main, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Harris, J.), rendered July 6, 1984, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crime of criminal mischief in the fourth degree.

Defendant was charged with criminal mischief in the second degree following an incident which occurred on July 16, 1983 in which the premises which defendant and three other per*482sons had rented were damaged. Following a trial, he was convicted of criminal mischief in the fourth degree, a class A misdemeanor. On this appeal, defendant contends that the People failed to prove the elements of this crime beyond a reasonable doubt, and the People concede that they produced legally insufficient evidence of defendant’s guilt. We agree. While the People did amply demonstrate that the premises in question had indeed been damaged, they failed to prove that defendant caused the damage. In light of this, defendant’s conviction must be reversed and the indictment dismissed.

Judgment reversed, on the law, and indictment dismissed. Mahoney, P. J., Main, Casey, Weiss and Mikoll, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 31.1CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES—OXLEY ACT OF 2002     I, John C. Corey certify that:(1) I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Stoneridge, Inc. (the “Company”);(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;(4) The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a — 15(f)and 15d — 15(f)) for the Company and we have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparationof financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and(5) The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and theaudit committee of the Company’s board of directors: (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.         /s/ John C. Corey   John C. Corey, President,
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Deborah Dearing, * From the 350th District

 Court of Taylor County,

 Trial Court No. 9783-D.

Vs. No. 11-12-00105-CR * June 12, 2014

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Wright, C.J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

Both the opinion and judgment of this court dated April 30, 2014, and entered in 

the minutes of this court at Volume 37, page 191 are withdrawn. The opinion and 

judgment of this court dated June 12, 2014, are substituted therefor.

11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Deborah Dearing, * From the 350th District

 Court of Taylor County,

 Trial Court No. 9783-D.

Vs. No. 11-12-00105-CR * June 12, 2014

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Wright, C.J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is error 

in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the 

judgment of the trial court is reversed, and the cause is remanded for a new trial.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Report (as defined under the preceding Certification By Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, Walter Thomas Price III, Managing Member of Beeland Management, L.L.C.,
the general partner of Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P. (the Partnership), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By: /s/    Walter Thomas Price IIIWalter Thomas Price III Managing
Member March 30, 2004
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James J. Smith, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Meehan, J.), rendered March 12, 1984, convicting him of assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People, and assuming that the jury credited the People’s witnesses *(see, People v Giuliano,*65 NY2d 766, 768; *People v Kennedy,*47 NY2d 196, 203), the evidence supports the conclusion that the laceration on the finger of the complaining witness was intentionally caused by the defendant as he wielded a machete. "[T]he introduction of a single item of exculpatory evidence [does not] mandate acquittal” whenever the circumstantial evidence standard is applied *(see, People v Kennedy, supra,*at p 204). The introduction of evidence that there was broken glass in the room from a smashed mirror was insufficient to support the inference that the laceration was caused by broken glass rather than the machete. The medical testimony indicated that the laceration in question was "clearly incised” and would not have been caused by a piece of the broken mirror. The doctor’s testimony that the laceration *could*have been caused by a piece of sharp glass excluded jagged-edged broken mirror glass from its scope.

The element of intent is established by the testimony of various prosecution witnesses, who attributed to the defendant various threats. Accepting, as we must, that the prosecution witnesses were credited and anything by the defense witness contradicting them was not, no contrary inference of unintentional causation would be reasonable.

The *Sandoval*ruling made by the trial court reflected a proper balancing of considerations, and was an appropriate exercise of discretion. Bracken, J. P., Niehoff, Eiber and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 78 (Friday, April 21, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 21304]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9834]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 2000-ASW-03]


Revision of Class E Airspace; Port Lavaca, TX

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice confirms the effective date of a direct final rule 
which revises Class E airspace at Port Lavaca, TX.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The direct final rule published at 65 FR 8045 is 
effective 0901 UTC, June 15, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donald J. Day, Airspace Branch, Air 
Traffic Division, Southwest Region, Federal Aviation Administration, 
Fort Worth, TX 76193-0520, telephone: 817-222-5593.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on February 17, 
2000, (65 FR 8045). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure 
for a noncontroversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be 
no adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public 
that no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written 
adverse comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an 
adverse comment, were received within the comment period, the 
regulation would become effective on June 15, 2000. No adverse comments 
were received, and, thus, this action confirms that this direct final 
rule will be effective on that date.

    Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on April 12, 2000.
Robert N. Stevens,
Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Southwest Region.
[FR Doc. 00-9834 Filed 4-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The
Stockholders of Coldwater Creek Inc.:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-82260, 333-60099, 333-31699 and 333-137025) on
Forms S-8 of Coldwater Creek Inc. of our report dated June 20, 2006, with respect to the consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows of
Coldwater Creek Inc. for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2006 which report appears in the February 2, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K of Coldwater
Creek Inc.

/s/
KPMG LLP

Boise,
Idaho
April 2, 2008

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of The PBSJ Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, John B. Zumwalt, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|             |  |  |  |     |  |                             |  |                                                                          
|------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|             |  |  | 
|May 14, 2004 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    JOHN B. ZUMWALT, III
|             |  |  |  |     |  |                             | 
|             |  |  |  |     |  |                             |  | John B. Zumwalt, III Vice Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2022290EN.01015401.xml

| 29.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 290/154 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 290/154

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 and Regulation (EU) No 223/2014 as regards Cohesion’s Action for Refugees in Europe (CARE)

(COM(2022) 109 final — 2022/0075 (COD))

(2022/C 290/28)

| Referral | European Parliament, 10.3.2022
  Council, 10.3.2022 |
| --- | --- |
| Legal basis | Articles 175(3), 177 and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union |
| Section responsible | Section for Employment, Social Affairs and Citizenship |
| Adopted at plenary | 23.3.2022 |
| Plenary session No | 568 |
| Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions) | 199/0/6 |

Referral

European Parliament, 10.3.2022

Council, 10.3.2022

Legal basis

Articles 175(3), 177 and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Section responsible

Section for Employment, Social Affairs and Citizenship

Adopted at plenary

23.3.2022

Plenary session No

568

Outcome of vote

(for/against/abstentions)

199/0/6

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and has already set out its views on the subject in its earlier opinions, namely SOC/597 — European Social Fund+, adopted on 17 October 2018, ECO/462 — Regulation on the European Regional Development Fund and Cohesion Fund, adopted on 17 October 2018, and also in its position papers SOC/651 — Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived (FEAD)/COVID-19 Crisis, ECO/517 — COVID-19: European Structural and Investment Funds — Exceptional flexibility, it decided, at its 568th plenary session of 23 and 24 March 2022 (meeting of 23 March 2022), by 199 votes, with no votes against and 6 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text and to refer to the position it had taken in the above-mentioned documents.

Brussels, 23 March 2022.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Christa SCHWENG

---