alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                  5

<S>                                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                          25,973
<SECURITIES>                                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   80,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                                    101,303
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               269,439
<PP&E>                                                         167,846
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  48,642
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 581,694
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        1,595,224
<BONDS>                                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                        24,152
<OTHER-SE>                                                  (1,252,390)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   581,694
<SALES>                                                        255,253
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               255,253
<CGS>                                                           87,620
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                1,651,593
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                 390
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             (1,396,730)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                (1,396,730)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                       (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     (.03)



</TABLE>
#### Malankara Archdiocese of Syrian Orthodox Church in North America et al., Respondents, v Mathew Thomas et al., Appellants. Board of Directors of St. Mary’s Malankara Syrian Orthodox Church of Rockland et al., Nonparty Appellants.

Submitted January 16, 2007;

decided February 22, 2007

Motion to dismiss appeal granted and appeal dismissed, with $400 costs and one $100 costs of motion, upon the ground that that part of the Appellate Division order that affirmed the denial of the motion to intervene does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution, and that as to the remainder of the Appellate Division order, no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 10-Q/A
Amendment No. 1
 þ
    
    QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the quarter ended September 30, 2007
 OR
 o
    
    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the transition period from  to
 Commission file number: 001 13337
 STONERIDGE, INC.
 
 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 Ohio
    
    34-1598949(State or other jurisdiction of 
incorporation or organization)
    
    (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 9400 East Market Street, Warren, Ohio
    
    44484(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 (330) 856-2443
 
   þ o
   o þ o
  o þ




---



##### 



STONERIDGE, INC.
FORM 10-Q/A
INTRODUCTORY NOTE




---



##### 



PART IIOTHER INFORMATION
 Item 6. Exhibits.
   SIGNATURES
  STONERIDGE, INC.Date: December 21, 2007
    /s/ John C. CoreyJohn C. CoreyPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer) Date: December 21, 2007
    /s/ George E. StricklerGeorge E. StricklerExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)  INDEX TO EXHIBITS
 Exhibit Number
    
    Exhibit10.1
    
    Amended and Restated Change in Control Agreement, filed herewith.31.1
    
    Chief Executive Officer certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.31.2
    
    Chief Financial Officer certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.32.1
    
    Chief Executive Officer certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.32.2
    
    Chief Financial Officer certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.
#### In the Matter of Kevin Patrick Brady, Appellant, v Jerome C. Gorski et al., Respondents.

Submitted December 11, 2006;

decided February 20, 2007

On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. Motion for leave to appeal denied. Motion to consolidate appeals dismissed as academic.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judge Pigott taking no part.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5930 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to impose limitations on airline 

practices concerning the expiration of tickets for air transportation, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 29, 2010 

Mr. TOWNS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to impose limitations 

on airline practices concerning the expiration of tickets 

for air transportation, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Consumer Protection 

5 in Airline Ticket Validity Act of 2010’’. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5930 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXPIRATION OF TICKETS FOR AIR TRANSPOR2 TATION. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 41712 of title 49, United 

4 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘(c) EXPIRATION OF TICKETS FOR AIR TRANSPOR7 TATION.—It shall be an unfair or deceptive practice under 

8 subsection (a) for any air carrier, foreign air carrier, or 

9 ticket agent— 

10 ‘‘(1) to sell a ticket for air transportation that 

11 expires before the last day of the 3-year period be12 ginning on the date of issuance of the ticket; or 

13 ‘‘(2) to impose restrictions, penalties, or fees 

14 that are unreasonable, as determined by the Sec15 retary, on rescheduling the itinerary of a passenger 

16 named on a ticket for air transportation if the re17 scheduling is requested before the ticket expires.’’. 

18 (b) REGULATIONS.—The Secretary of Transportation 

19 shall issue regulations to carry out the amendment made 

20 by subsection (a). 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.2


                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14
              UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED
                 (SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

I, DONALD B. COHEN , certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of The Quantum Group, Inc.
for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2004;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

         c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);

         a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls over financial reporting.


Date:   February 11, 2005

/s/ DONALD B. COHEN
-------------------
DONALD B. COHEN
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit
1
  InfoVista SA




---



##### 



2 Article 1  FORM
 S.A.R.L.
 Société Anonyme Code de commerce
 Article 2  OBJECTS
  
    
    Research operations, analysis, creation, development and editing of programmes,
    
    Training, consultancy, sales, distribution and maintenance concerning all hardware, software and services pertaining to
computing structures, automatic processes or automation, product automation, office automation and telecommunications
for public and private companies or institutions whatsoever their specific field of activity,
    
    And generally, all industrial, commercial, movable, immovable and financial operations related directly or indirectly
to the objects stated above or contributing to their development.
 Article 3  NAME
 InfoVista SA
 Article 4  HEAD OFFICE




---



##### 



3 Article 5  DURATION
  Article 6  AUTHORISED CAPITAL
   Article 7  INCREASE IN CAPITAL
    Code de commerce
  Code de commerce
 Article 8  DECREASE IN CAPITAL




---



##### 



4 Article 9  PAYMENT OF SHARES
  Code de
commerce
 Article 10  TYPE OF SHARES
    Article 11  TRANSFER OF SHARES
  Article 12  RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS ATTACHED TO SHARES




---



##### 



5   Article 13  APPOINTMENT OF MEMBERS TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
     ARTICLE 14  MEETINGS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS




---



##### 



6      Article 15  POWERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
     Article 16  COMPANY MANAGEMENT
 
    
    Chairman of the Board of Directors




---



##### 



7    
    
    Senior Management
      
    
    Chief Executive Officer (CEO)




---



##### 



8  
    
    Deputy Chief Executive Officer (Directeur général délégué)
         Article 17  REMUNERATION OF DIRECTORS




---



##### 



9 Article 18  RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE DIRECTORS AND THE GENERAL MANAGEMENT
 Sociétés
Anonymes
 Article 19  COMMITTEE OF EXTERNAL ADVISERS
     Article 20  AUDITORS
   Article 21  RULES COMMON TO ALL GENERAL MEETINGS
   Code de
commerce




---



##### 



10 
    
    as regards holders of registered shares, the listing of shares in
the shareholders name in the company registers not less than five
days before the date of the general meeting;
 
    
    as regards holders of bearer shares, the submitting, at the place
specified in the notice of meeting, of a certificate issued by the
intermediary keeping their account, which states the
unavailability of the shares listed in the account until the date
of the general meeting. This formality should be carried out not
less than five days before the date of the general meeting as set
forth in article 136 of the decree of 23 March 1967.




---



##### 



11  Article 22- PROVISIONS SPECIFIC TO ORDINARY GENERAL MEETINGS.
       Article 23  PROVISIONS SPECIFIC TO EXTRAORDINARY GENERAL MEETINGS




---



##### 



12  Article 24  ACCOUNTING YEAR
  Article 25  ACCOUNTS
    Article 26  ALLOCATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF EARNINGS
   Article 27  PAYMENT OF DIVIDENDS




---



##### 



13 Article 28   SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY LESS THAN HALF THE AUTHORISED CAPITAL
    Article 29  DISSOLUTION  LIQUIDATION




---



##### 



14 Article 30  DISPUTES
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7371

KENNETH LAMONT BROOKS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (3:05-cv-03557-CMC) Submitted: March 30, 2007 Decided: April 11, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenneth Lamont Brooks, Appellant Pro Se. Stacey Denise Haynes, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Kenneth Lamont Brooks seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Brooks has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and di smiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.1


Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C §1350,


As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of BancPlus Corporation and Subsidiaries (the “Company”), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that this Special Financial Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:March 17, 2020/s/ William A. RayWilliam A. RayPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ M. Ann SoutherlandM. Ann SoutherlandExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

Ju ly 12 , 2017 

# Order

Clerk Ju ly 12 , 2017

154442 (13 8 )

ALI BAZZI,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

and

GENEX PHYSICAL THERAPY, INC. and

ELITE CHIROPRACTIC CENTER, PC,

Intervening Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

and

TRANSMEDIC, LLC,

Intervening Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 154442

v C OA: 320518

Wayne CC: 13

- 000659

- NF

SENTINEL INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant/Third

- Party

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

and

CITIZENS INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendan t

- Appellee,

and

HALA BAYDOUN BAZZI and

MARIAM BAZZI

, Third

- Party Defendants

- Appellees.

________________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice

, the motion of p laintiff

- a ppellant Ali Bazzi and

i ntervening p laintiffs

- a ppellants Genex Physical Therapy, Inc., and Elite Chiropractic

Center, PC , to extend the time for filing their brief on appeal is GRANTED. The brief

will be accepted for filing if submitted on or before August 9, 2017

.
## IN THE COU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS OF TE XAS A P - 75, 889
EX PA R TE BA R R Y S. D A V I S, A ppl i c ant
ON AP P LI CAT I ON F OR A W RI T OF HABE AS CORP US CAUS E N O. 9 2 F 0 0 8 3 - 0 0 5 - A I N T HE 5 TH DI S TR I CT COURT

FROM BOW I E COU NTY
P er cur i am . O P I N I O N Pur s uant t o t he pr ovi s i ons of A r t i cl e 11. 07 of t he Texas C ode of Cri m i nal Pr ocedur e, t he cler k o f t he tr i al cou rtt ransm i t t ed to thi s C ou rt t his app l i cat i on for w ri t of h abeas co rpus. E x par t e Y oung , 418 S. W
. 2d 824, 826 ( T ex. C r i m . A pp. 1967)
. A ppl i cantw as convi ct ed of
a g g ra v a te d a s s a u lt a n d se n ten c e d to tw e n tyy e a rs’ im p riso n m e n t. H e d id n o t ap p e a l h is convi ct i on. Applicant conte nds that the sentenc e is illeg al beca use it is outside the sentenc ing r ang e for the third degree felony offe nse of ag g ravated assault
. We r emande d this application to the trial court for f indings of f

act a nd conclusions of law
.Ag g ravated assault ag ainst a per son who was not a me mber of a designated c lass, such 1 as pea ce of

fice rs, later

beca me a se cond degree felony for of fense s committed on or afte r September 1, 1994. The judgment ref

lects that this offense w as committed April 19, 1991. The trial court ha s de te rm ine d th at App lic ant p le d guil ty to c a us ingse ri ou s b od ily

inj ur y to h is w if

e and that a ll enhanc ements we re w aived. The court a lso found that Applicant’s plea was enter ed pursua

nt to an
a g re e me nt. At the time this offe nse was committed ag gravated assault was a third degree felony , so a 1 punishment of t wenty year s was not authorized. Applicant is entitled to relief. Ex parte Be ck, 922 S.W .2d 181 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Relief is grante d. The judgment i n Cause No. D-202-CR-92-83 in the 202 J udicial District nd Court of B ow ie County

is se t asi de , an d App lic ant is re mand e d to the c us tod y of the She ri ff

of B ow ie County to a ns we r t he c ha rg e a g a ins t him
. Copies of this opinion s hallb e s e nt t o th e T e xa s D ep a r tment of Criminal J ustice–Corre ctional Institut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Deliver ed: April 9, 2008 Do No t Pu

bli sh
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

 

MISC. NO. 11-22

IN RE: RULES ADVISORY COMMITTEE

O R D E R

It is ORDERED, pursuant to Rule 40(b) and (c)(1) of the Court's Rules of Practice and 

Procedure (Rules), that the following individual is appointed by the Board of Judges to serve as 

chair of the Court's Rules Advisory Committee for a term as indicated:

Christopher W. Wallace, Esq., for a term as chair ending December 28, 2024, vice Amy B. 

Kretkowski, Esq., whose term expired.

Further, it is ORDERED, pursuant to Rule 40(b) and (c)(1) of the Court's Rules, that the 

following members of the Court's Bar are appointed to the Court's Rules Advisory Committee for 

a term as indicated:

Thomas M. Polseno, Esq., for a term ending December 28, 2024, vice Christopher W. 

Wallace, Esq., who is now appointed to serve as chair of the Rules Advisory Committee;

 Christopher Glenn Murray, Esq., for a term ending December 28, 2024, vice Kenneth M.

Carpenter, Esq., whose term expired;

Thomas J. Kniffen, Esq., for a term ending December 28, 2024, vice Judy J. Donegan, 

whose term expired; and

 Debra L. Bernal, Esq., for a term ending January 11, 2025, vice Selket Nicole Cottle whose 

term is ending January 11, 2023.

 

 

DATED: December 28, 2022 FOR THE COURT:

 /s/Gregory O. Block

 GREGORY O. BLOCK

 Clerk of the Court
EXHIBIT 32.01



The following certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or
otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and
irrespective of any general incorporation language in any filings.



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SigmaTel, Inc., a Delaware corporation, for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, each of the undersigned officers of SigmaTel, Inc. certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his respective knowledge:



(1) the quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) the information contained in the quarterly report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SigmaTel, Inc. for the periods presented therein.



|                    |  |                        
|------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: July 20, 2004 |  | /s/ Ronald P. Edgerton 
|                    |  | Ronald P. Edgerton     
|                    |  | Chief Executive Officer



|                    |  |                        
|------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: July 20, 2004 |  |                        
|                    |  | /s/ Ross A. Goolsby    
|                    |  | Ross A. Goolsby        
|                    |  | Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of the above
certification has been provided to SigmaTel, Inc. and will be retained by SigmaTel, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.