alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 9 of 24
**Exhibit 99(a)**
**KEYCORP STUDENT LOAN TRUST 2000-A**
**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**   JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., ELT Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, IT4 New York Plaza, 6th Floor 60 Wall Street, 26th Floor-MS NYC60-2606New York, NY 10004 New York, NY 10007Attn: ITS – Global Debt Attn: Corporate Trust & Agency GroupPhone: (212) 623-5427           Structured FinanceFax: (212) 623-5933 Phone: (212) 250-8522 Fax: (212) 797-8606   KeyBank National Association MBIA Insurance Corporation800 Superior Ave, 4th Floor 113 King StreetCleveland, OH 44114 Armonk, NY 10504Attn: President, KER Attn: Data AdministrationPhone: (216) 828-4293 Phone: (914) 765-3772Fax: (216) 828-9301 Fax: (914) 765-3660
Pursuant to Section 4.09 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement among KeyBank National Association,successor in interest to Key Bank USA, National Association, as Seller, Master Servicer andAdministrator, KeyCorp Student Loan Trust 2000-A, as Issuer, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., assuccessor in interest to Bank One, National Association, not in its individual capacity but solelyas Eligible Lender Trustee, dated as of June 1, 2000 (the “Agreement”), the undersigned herebycertifies that (i) a review of the activities of the Master Servicer from January 1, 2004, throughDecember 31, 2004, and of its performance under the Agreement has been made, and (ii) to the bestof our knowledge, based on our review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations underthe Agreement throughout such period.        KeyBank National Association,successor in interest toKey Bank USA, National Associationas Master Servicer      by: /S/ DANIEL G. SMITH    Date: February 18, 2005 Name:
Exhibit 11.1

SERONO SACODE OF ETHICS ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

---

This
Code of Ethics (the "Code") has been adopted by the Board of Serono S.A. ("Serono") on July 16, 2004 and subsequently amended on October 18, 2005. This Code summarizes
the standards that the members of the Board of Directors (the "Directors"), the Chief Executive (the "CEO"), the members of the Executive Management Board, Regional Vice-Presidents and
General managers (the "Executives), as well as the Chief Financial Officer, the group principal accounting officer and controller, and the regional and unit financial controllers (the "Financial
Officers") are expected to follow in the performance of their duties.

The
Directors, CEO, Executives and Financial Officers shall:



---





Any
change or waiver of this Code may be made only by the Board of Directors and will be disclosed as required by applicable laws.

The
appropriate Compliance Officer to whom any reporting of suspected violations by the Directors or CEO must be made will be the Chairman of the Audit Committee.

In
case of violation of this Code the Chairman of the Audit Committee shall make a recommendation to the Board of Directors on the appropriate action required to remedy such violation.

Any
suspected violation of this Code by the Executives and/or Financial Officers shall be reported to the Worldwide Compliance Officer. In case of violation of this Code the Worldwide
Compliance Officer shall make a recommendation to the CEO on the appropriate action required to remedy such violation.

Coinsins,
October 2005

2

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                        5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements for Charter Municipal Mortgage Acceptance Company and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           63,198,186
<SECURITIES>                                    548,231,828
<RECEIVABLES>                                     9,775,221
<ALLOWANCES>                                        138,000
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    598,593
<PP&E>                                                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  635,978,015
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            60,462,247
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                      328,515,768
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    635,978,015
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 17,198,860
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  4,867,623
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  373,478
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  11,957,759
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                     11,957,759
<EPS-BASIC>                                           .53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           .53



</TABLE>
exv10w4wa






Exhibit 10.4(a)




June 9, 2009




Graham Capital Management, L.P.

Rock Ledge Financial Center

40 Highland Avenue

Rowayton, CT 06853




Attention: Mr. Paul Sedlack



          Re: Management Agreement Renewals



Dear Mr. Sedlack:




We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which
reference is made below (the “Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management
Agreements through June 30, 2010 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain
unchanged.





	 
	 
	 	•	 	Citigroup Diversified 2000 Futures Fund L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. II
	 
	 	•	 	Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	Citigroup Fairfield Futures Fund L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	Citigroup Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	Citigroup Fairfield Futures Fund L.P. II
	 
	 	•	 	CMF Graham Master Fund L.P.





Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it
to the attention of Ms. Jennifer Magro at the address above or fax to 212-793-1986. If you have any
questions I can be reached at 212-559-5046.




Very truly yours,




CITIGROUP MANAGED FUTURES LLC





	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Jennifer Magro	 	 
	 	 	 
	 

	 	Jennifer Magro	 	 
	 

	 	Chief Financial Officer and Director	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Paul Sedlack	 	 
	 	 	 





Print Name: Paul Sedlack




JM/sr
#### Bienville Water Supply Co. *v.*The City of Mobile.

Appeal from Mobile Chancery Court.

Heard before the Hon. William H. Tayloe.

Bestor & Gray, for appellant.

B. B. Boone, for appellee.

*648Opinion by

McClellan, C. J.

*647The bill in this cause was filed by the appellee, the city of Mobile, on May 26th, 1894, against the Bienville Water Supply Company, and sought to restrain the said company from shutting off or lowering the pressure upon its water mains which supplied water to the city of Mobile for fire and municipal purposes. The appellant demurred to the bill, the demurrer was overruled *648by the chancellor, and the case was brought to this court by the Bienville Water Company to revise the decree of the chancellor, overruling its demurrers. This court, in an opinion by Chief Justice Brickell, affirmed the ruling of the chancellor as appears from the report of the cause in 112 Ala. 260. Thereafter the litigation ivas continued and the cause came up for final hearing at the April Term, 1897, and was submitted upon the bill, answer and proof taken in the cause, resulting in a decree being entered in favor of the appellee, on June 23, 1897. Said decree provided “that the defendant, the Bienville Water Supply Company, is hereby restrained and strictly enjoined from cutting off the water supply furnished by it to the city of Mobile for fire and municipal purposes and further from reducing the pressure upon its water mains below the pressure necessary and proper to furnish a sufficient supply of water for fire and municipal purposes for the city of Mobile.” From this decree the present appeal is prosecuted. •

After a careful consideration of the evidence in the case this court- concurs in the conclusion reached by the chancellor, that the Bienville Water Supply Company intended at the time this bill ivas filed and the injunction issued and served, to violate the duty it was under to supply water to the city of Mobile for the extinguishment of fires and for other municipal purposes in sufficient quantities and under sufficient pressure to subserve those purposes.

The decree of the chancery court enjoining said company from violating its said duty is affirmed.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service
 AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior.
 ACTION: Notice of issuance of Letters of Authorization to take marine mammals incidental to oil and gas industry activities.
 SUMMARY: In accordance with section 101(a)(5)(A) of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as amended, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service implementing regulations [50 CFR 18.27(f)(3)], notice is hereby given that Letters of Authorization to take polar bears and Pacific walrus incidental to oil and gas industry exploration, development, and production activities have been issued to the following companies: Company
Activity
Date issuedExxon Mobil
Exploration
March 16, 2000.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. John W. Bridges at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Marine Mammals Management Office, 1011 East Tudor Road, Anchorage, Alaska 99503, (800) 362-5148 or (907) 786-3810.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Letters of Authorization were issued in accordance with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Federal Rules and Regulations “Marine Mammals; Incidental Take During Specified Activities (65 FR 5275; February 3, 2000).” Dated: March 27, 2000. Gary Edwards, Deputy Regional Director.


[FR Doc. 00-9726  Filed 4-18-00; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-22-00223-CV

In the Matter of the Marriage of Xavier Arrisola and Lindsay Denise Roschetzky 

and in the Interest of X.B.A.

On Appeal from the

36th District Court of Bee County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. B-21-1143-CV-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 21, 2022
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 12-566V

Filed: September 30, 2015

Not for Publication

*************************************

MANIA HARMITT, *

*

 Petitioner, * 

 * Interim attorneys’ fees and costs decision 

* based on stipulation of fact

*

v. *

 *

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

 *

 Respondent. *

 *

*************************************

Mindy M. Roth, Glen Rock, NJ, for petitioner.

Jennifer L. Reynaud, Washington, DC, for respondent.

MILLMAN, Special Master

DECISION AWARDING INTERIM ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS1

On September 30, 2015, the parties filed a stipulation of fact in which they agreed on an 

appropriate amount for interim attorneys’ fees and costs in this case. 

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master’s action in this 

case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal 

Claims’s website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 

2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made 

available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is 

privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and 

move to redact such information prior to the document=s disclosure. If the special master, upon review, 

agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall 

redact such material from public access.

 
In accordance with the General Order #9 requirement, petitioner asserts that she did not 

incur any costs in pursuit of her petition. Petitioner submitted a draft application for interim 

attorneys’ fees and costs to respondent seeking a total of $26,424.00. Respondent does not object 

to this amount. The undersigned finds this amount to be reasonable. Accordingly, the court 

awards $26,424.00, representing reimbursement for interim attorneys’ fees and costs. The award 

shall be in the form of a check payable jointly to petitioner and Britcher Leone & Roth LLC in the 

amount of $26,424.00.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the 

court is directed to enter judgment herewith.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 30, 2015 s/ Laura D. Millman

 Laura D. Millman

 Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party, either separately or 

jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.

2
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued our report dated May 29, 2008, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of Q.E.P. Co., Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended February 29, 2008 (which report expressed an unqualified opinion and contains an explanatory paragraph
relating to the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year
Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements). We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statement of Q.E.P. Co., Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-135129,
effective June 19, 2006).



|                      
|----------------------
|/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
|                      
|Miami, Florida        
|May 29, 2008
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6274

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DANTE L. WILLIAMS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District 

Judge. (3:06-cr-00045-HEH-1; 3:08-cv-679)

Submitted: April 22, 2010 Decided: April 28, 2010

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dante L. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Sinclair Duffey, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Dante L. Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) 

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 

322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); 

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have 

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Williams has 

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a 

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference into the Company's
registration statement on Form S-8, filed with the Commission on August 16,
2001, and the Company's registration statement on Form S-8, filed with the
Commission on May 30, 2003, of our report dated February 2, 2004 on the
consolidated balance sheet of MBT Financial Corp. (the "Company") as of December
31, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, which report is
included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2003.



Plante & Moran, PLLC

Auburn Hills, Michigan
March 12, 2004
















                                       46
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of AboveNet, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph P. Ciavarella,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Date:  August
      9, 2010
            By:
            /s/
      Joseph P. CiavarellaJoseph
      P. Ciavarella
              Chief
      Financial Officer
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Chinawe.com Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Vivian Chu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Vivian Chu
Chief Financial Officer
November 22, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Chinawe.com Inc. and will be
retained by Chinawe.com Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
```
Exhibit 10.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in InfoVista's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-12256) and Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-81300)
of our report dated July 23, 2002 relating to InfoVista's financial statements, which appears in InfoVista's Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended June 30, 2002.

Paris,
December 19, 2002

Coopers
& Lybrand Audit
Member of PriceWaterhouseCoopers

|/s/JEAN-FRANÇOIS CHÂTELJean-François Châtel Partner |  |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------- |  |  | 

---

QuickLinks
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alphonso Kirksey, Appellant.

Submitted April 23, 2007;

decided May 8, 2007

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no civil appeal lies from the order *980of the Appellate Division entered , in this criminal action *(see*NY Const, art VI, § 3 [bj; CPLR 5601; CPL 450.90).
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Advanced Technologies
Group, Ltd. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2011 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"),
the undersigned, Alex Stelmak, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 that:

     (1)  The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


Date: April 27, 2011                         /s/ Alex Stelmak
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Alex Stelmak
                                             Chief Executive Officer,
                                             Chairman of the Board and
                                             Chief Financial Officer