alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Air Force 

Pursuant to the provisions of Part 404 of Title 37, Code of Federal Regulations, which implements Public Law 96-517, the Department of the Air Force announces its intention to grant SMJ Carbon Technology, a company doing business in Nashua, New Hampshire (NH) an exclusive license in any right, title and interest the Air Force has in U.S. Patent Application entitled “CARBON AND CERMAIC MATRIX COMPOSITES FABRICATED BY A RAPID AND LOW-COST PROCESS INCORPORATING IN-SITU POLYMERIZATION OF WETTING MONOMERS.” The inventors, Phillip G. Wapner, Wesley P. Hoffman and Steven Jones were all government employees at the time of the invention. The invention was filed in the U.S. Patent and Trade Office on June 8, 1998. 

The license described above will be granted unless an objection thereto, together with a request for an opportunity to be heard, if desired, is received in writing by the addressee set forth below within 60 days from the date of publication of this Notice. Information concerning the application may be obtained, on request, from the same addressee. 

All communications concerning this Notice should be sent to Mr. Randy Heald, Associate General Counsel (Acquisition), SAF/GCQ, 1500 Wilson Blvd., Suite 304, Arlington, VA 22209-2310. Mr. Heald can be reached at 703-588-5091 or by fax at 703-588-8037. 

Janet A. Long,

Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 00-9862 Filed 4-19-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001-05-P
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Security Intelligence
      Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Ben Jamil, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Chris R.
      Decker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
      the best of my knowledge and belief that:




(1) the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:October
              5, 2007/s/ Ben JamilBen
              Jamil, Chief Executive
              Officer




/s/ Chris R. DeckerChris
              R. Decker, Chief Financial
              Officer





This
      certification shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GUILLERMO AYALA

- PEREZ, AKA Guillermo Perez,

Petitioner,

v.
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 15

- 72762

Agency No. A092

- 169

- 546

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 8, 2017 **

Before: LEAVY, W. FLETCHER, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Guillermo Ayala

- Perez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review
of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his motion to reopen removal

proceedings. Our jurisdictio n is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAR 16 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 15

- 72762

abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen and review de novo questions

of law. Mohammed v. Gonzales
, 400 F.3d 785, 791

- 92 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny

in part and dismiss in part the petition for re view.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Ayala

- Perez’s motion to

reopen as untimely, where it was filed more than 15 years after his final order of

removal, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(1), and Ayala

- Perez failed to establish the due

diligen ce required for equitable tolling of the filing deadline, see Avagyan v.

Holder
, 646 F.3d 672, 679 (9th Cir. 2011) ( equitable tolling is available to an alien

who is prevented from timely filing a motion to reopen due to deception, fraud, or

error, as long as petitioner exercises due diligence in discovering such

circumstances).

Ayala

- Perez’s contention that the BIA erred in denying sua sponte reopening

for lack of due diligence does not raise a legal or constitutional error to invok e our
jurisdiction. See Bonilla v. Lynch
, 840 F.3d 575, 588 (9th Cir. 2016)

. We lack jurisdiction to consider Ayala

- Perez’s contentions regarding due

process violations at his underlying 1999 removal proceedings because this

petition is not timely as to th e IJ’s 1999 decision

. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1)

. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20958-20959]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9770]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL99-75-003]


California Electricity Oversight Board; Notice of Filing

April 13, 2000.
    Take notice that on March 20, 2000, the California Independent 
System Operator Corporation (ISO) tendered for filing an amendment to 
its Amended and Restated Bylaws, as revised December 1999. The Amended 
and Revised Bylaws are intended to comply with the Commission's Order 
in the above-captioned docket. The instant amendment requests that the 
Commission accept the amendment effective March 20, 2000.
    The ISO states that this filing has been served upon all persons on 
the official service list in the above-identified docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and

[[Page 20959]]

385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before 
April 24, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to 
determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-9770 Filed 4-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Harry Louis, Appellant.

Submitted May 21, 2007;

decided June 5, 2007

Motion for an extension of the time within which to apply for permission to appeal pursuant to CPL 460.20 granted and motion papers treated as a timely CPL 460.20 application.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Page 8 of 18

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(b)

                        KEYCORP STUDENT LOAN TRUST 2000-A
                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE


Bank One, National Association              Banker's Trust Company
One Bank One Plaza, Suite 0126              Four Albany Street
Chicago, Illinois 60670                     New York, New York  10006
ATTN: Corporate Trust Administration        ATTN: Corporate Trust & Agency Group
                                                  Structured Finance
Phone:   (312) 407-0192                     Phone: (212) 250-6501
Fax:     (312) 407-1708                     Fax:   (212) 250-6439

Key Bank USA, National Association          MBIA Insurance Corporation
800 Superior Ave, 4th Floor                 113 King Street
Cleveland, OH   44114                       Armonk, NY 10504
ATTN:   Senior Vice President               ATTN: Data Administration
         Key Education Resources            Phone:  (914) 765-3772
Phone:  (216) 828-9342                      Fax:    (914) 765-3810
Fax:    (216) 828-9417


Pursuant to Section 3.08 of the Subservicing Agreement between Key Bank USA,
National Association as Master Servicer and Pennsylvania Higher Education
Assistance Agency, as Subservicer, dated as of June 1, 2000 (the "Agreement"),
the undersigned hereby certifies that (i) a review of the activities of the
Subservicer from the inception of the Trust through December 31, 2000, and of
its performance under the Agreement has been made, and (ii) to the best of the
undersigned's knowledge, based on the review, the Subservicer has fulfilled all
its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period





                                            PENNSYLVANIA HIGHER EDUCATION
                                            ASSISTANCE AGENCY,  Subservicer

Date:      3-21-01                          By     /s/ Ernest P Beardsley
     ----------------------------             ---------------------------
                                            Name: Ernest P. Beardsley
                                            Title: Senior Vice President
GMAC
                                      ----

                               Commercial Mortgage
                               -------------------



                              Report of Management
                              --------------------

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2000, GMAC  Commercial  Mortgage Corp.
and its subsidiaries (collectively,  the "Company) have complied in all material
respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Company's minimum
servicing  standards  (attached),  which were derived from the Mortgage  Bankers
Association  of  America's  Uniform  Single  Attestation  Program  for  Mortgage
Bankers. As of and for this same period,  GMAC Commercial  Mortgage  Corporation
had in effect a General Motors  Corporation  Fidelity bond of $150 million and a
GMAC Commercial  Mortgage  Corporation errors and omissions policy in the amount
of $50 million




                                                March 19, 2001
/s/ Michael I. Lipson
Michael I. Lipson
Executive Vice President







            200 Witmer Road o P.O. Box 1015 o Horsham, PA 19044-8015
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 7, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41016

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ALFREDO AVALOS-RODRIGUEZ, also known as Alfredo

Rodriguez-Correa, 

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 2:06-CR-124

--------------------

Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Alfredo AvalosRodriguez raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held

that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a

separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary

affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
##### 



Exhibit 8.1

Subsidiaries of Embraer  Empresa Brasileira de Aeronáutica S.A.

|                                                      |  |                    
|----------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------
|                                                      |  | Jurisdiction of    
|Name                                                  |  | Incorporation      
|                                                      |  |                    
|Embraer Aircraft Holding, Inc  EAH                   |  | Delaware, U.S.A.   
|Embraer
Aircraft Customer Services, Inc.  EACS       |  | Florida, U.S.A.    
|Embraer Aircraft Marketing Corp.  EMC                |  | Florida, U.S.A.    
|Embraer Aircraft Maintenance Services, Inc.  EAMS    |  | Delaware, U.S.A.   
|AEROChain, LLC                                        |  | Delaware, U.S.A.   
|Embraer Services, Inc.  ESI                          |  | Delaware, U.S.A.   
|Embraer Engineering Services, Inc.  EEI              |  | Delaware, U.S.A.   
|Indústria Aeronáutica Neiva Ltda.  Neiva             |  | Brazil             
|Embraer Finance Ltd.  EFL                            |  | Cayman Islands, BWI
|Embraer Merco S/A  EMS                               |  | Uruguay            
|ELEB-Embraer Liebherr Equipamentos do Brasil S.A.     |  | Brazil             
|Trumpeter, Inc.                                       |  | Delaware, U.S.A.   
|Embraer Aviation Europe SAS  EAE                     |  | France             
|Embraer
Aviation International  EAI                  |  | France             
|Embraer Australia Pty Ltd.  EAL                      |  | Australia          
|Embraer Credit Ltd.  ECL                             |  | Delaware, U.S.A.   
|Embraer Europe SARL  EES                             |  | France             
|Embraer Representation, LLC  ERL                     |  | Delaware, U.S.A    
|Harbin Embraer Aircraft Industry Company, Ltd.  HEAI |  | China              
|Embraer Spain Holding Co., SL  ESH                   |  | Spain              
|ECC Investment Switzerland AG  SWIN                  |  | Switzerland        
|ECC
Insurance & Financial Company Ltd.                |  | Cayman Islands, BWI
|ECC Leasing Company Ltd.                              |  | Ireland
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Morales, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Naro, J.), rendered June 18, 1985, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered. The facts have been considered and are determined to be established.

The defendant was charged with, and now stands convicted of, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second *91degree. At the trial, over the objection of defense counsel *(cf., People v Ramirez,*125 AD2d 343, *lv denied*69 NY2d 885), the People were permitted to elicit of a police officer that the defendant, when questioned by the officer, had in his possession, a "wad of money of five, tens and twenty dollar bills”. The officer further testified that as soon as he observed the wad of bills, he returned to the station wagon from which the defendant had emerged earlier and found a black bag containing envelopes of cocaine.

We conclude that the court erred in admitting the officer’s testimony in respect to the wad of cash possessed by the defendant. The police testimony concerning the defendant’s possession of a "wad of money”—of no relevance to the defendant’s alleged possession of the cocaine—was highly prejudicial, since it suggested that the defendant was involved in the sale of illicit drugs as a business and was likely to have possessed the cocaine recovered *(People v Brown,*71 AD2d 918, 920; *see, People v Jones,*62 AD2d 356). Moreover, at bar, where the charge was drug possession and not drug sale, the error was particularly prejudicial *(see, People v Brown, supra,*at 920). While there was sufficient evidence adduced to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, the case, nevertheless, was a close one in which the proof was circumstantial. We cannot, therefore, conclude that the admission of the foregoing police testimony was harmless error *(cf., People v Bolling,*120 AD2d 601, 602, *lv denied*68 NY2d 665). Rubin, J. P., Kooper, Spatt and Harwood, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Timothy B. Murphy,  certify that this  amendment to report on Form 10-Q fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange  Act of 1934 and  that  information  contained  in this  report  fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of Investors Capital Holdings, Ltd.


Date: February 27, 2006


By: /s/ Timothy B. Murphy
---------------------------------------------------
Timothy B. Murphy, President,
Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Director
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David White, Appellant.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People *(see, People v Malizia,*62 NY2d 755, *cert denied*469 US 932) the evidence adduced at trial proved, beyond a reasonable doubt, the defendant’s guilt of robbery in the first degree and burglary in the first degree.

We reject the defendant’s contention that it was error to admit into evidence testimony by a neighbor of the complaining witness that the latter, while prostrate in the hallway, and bleeding from multiple head wounds and an arm wound told her that the defendant was one of the people who had robbed him. The complaining witness’s testimony established that he had crawled across the hallway to his neighbor’s apartment, after being beaten to the ground by the robbers, and, after speaking with his neighbors, passed out. These circumstances indicate that the statement that the defendant was one of the robbers was made by the complaining witness when he was under the stress of the excitement caused by the robbery, without having had time for studied reflection *(see, People v Edwards,*47 NY2d 493), and the statement was properly admitted as an excited utterance *(see,*Richardson, Evidence § 281 [Prince 10th ed]).

The defendant’s other contentions are either unpreserved or without merit. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Rubin and Spatt, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (No. 333-146557and No. 333-135485) on Form S-3 of GeoPetro Resources Company of ourreport dated March 31, 2010, relating to our audits of the consolidatedfinancial statements which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K ofGeoPetro Resources Company for the year ended December 31, 2009.

 

***/s/HEIN**** **& ASSOCIATES LLP*

Dallas,Texas

March 31,2010

 

----
CERTIFICATION


     In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Investors Capital
Holdings, Ltd. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, Theodore E. Charles, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.





Date:    February 17, 2004                    By:  /s/ Theodore E. Charles

                                                       Theodore E. Charles
                                                       Chief Executive Officer


                                       25
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.3

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Jason W. Rees, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of Pyramid Breweries
Inc. ("registrant"), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the registrant;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and we have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within the
      entity, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors:

      a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      controls over financial reporting.

Date: August 16, 2004

/s/ JASON W. REES
-------------------------
Jason W. Rees
Controller and Chief Accounting Officer