alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022459EN.01000401.xml

| 2.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 459/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 459/4

---

Opinion 07/2022

(pursuant to Article 322(1)(a), TFEU)

concerning the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 as regards the establishment of a diversified funding strategy as a general borrowing method [2022/0370 (COD)]

(2022/C 459/04)

The European Court of Auditors has published its opinion 07/2022 (pursuant to Article 322(1), TFEU) concerning the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 as regards the establishment of a diversified funding strategy as a general borrowing method [2022/0370 (COD)].

The opinion can be consulted directly or downloaded at the European Court of Auditors’ website: https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/Pages/DocItem.aspx?did=62737

---
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Michael S. Liss, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FiberNet Telecom Group, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterlyreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: May 14, 2004
Exhibit 32.2


                             AMERICAN SKIING COMPANY
                  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Skiing Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Helen
E. Wallace, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Date:  June 14, 2006

                                       By:/s/ Helen E. Wallace
                                       ---------------------------------
                                       Helen E. Wallace
                                       Senior Vice President, Chief
                                       Financial Officer
                                       (Principal Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION



<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 32.2

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Annual  Report of Infinity  Capital  Group,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending  December 31, 2006 as filed with
the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report") I,
Theodore A. Greenberg,  Chief Financial  Officer,  Chief Investment  Officer and
Secretary of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: April 16, 2007


Name: Theodore A. Greenberg

/s/Theodore A. Greenberg
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Position: Chief Financial Officer, Chief Investment Officer and Secretary


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         76,691
<SECURITIES>                                   2,195,856
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,116,461
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,321)
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         30,793
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (9,337)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,587,116
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       477
<OTHER-SE>                                     633,873
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,587,116
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               142,116
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               75,835
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               722
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             55,382
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                10,177
<INCOME-TAX>                                   4,101
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            6,020
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   6,020
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.13
        


</TABLE>
# Temporary Rule Increasing Automatic Extension Period of Employment Authorization and/or EADs for Certain Individuals

On April 8, 2024, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) published a second temporary final rule (89 FR 24628) temporarily increasing the automatic extension period for employment authorization and/or Employment Authorization Documents (EAD, Form I-766) to up to 540 days. This temporary increase is available to certain individuals who timely filed Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization, renewal applications on or before Sept. 30, 2025. Previously, the EAD auto-extension was only up to 180 days for EAD renewal applications received by USCIS on or after Oct. 27, 2023. 

Agencies should accept EADs, including those that appear expired, in the following circumstances:
                - The EAD “Card Expires” date has passed and states an  eligible category ; and
                - The benefit applicant also presents a Form I-797C, Notice of Action, receipt notice for a renewal Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization, that states the same eligibility category as the category on the front of the EAD, except:
                - The EAD category codes do not need to match for Temporary Protected Status applicants if one is A12 (TPS approved) and the other is C19 (TPS pending).
                - The EAD category codes C26, A17, and A18 for certain nonimmigrant dependent spouses require an unexpired Form I-94 indicating H-4 (C26), E (A17) and L-2 (A18) nonimmigrant status be presented along with the Form I-797C. 

This temporary final rule also provides benefit applicants whose Form I-797C was issued on or after Oct. 27, 2023, and references the up to 180-day extension, an additional extension up to 360 days, for a total of up to 540 days past the “Card Expires” date of the current EAD, if their renewal application was still pending with USCIS as of Apr. 8, 2024 (when the second TFR was published).

**SAVE Verification**

SAVE will generally verify employment authorization as part of initial verification, including automatically extended EAD validity periods. Additional manual verification may be required in limited instances, such as when the benefit applicant’s information does not match federal immigration records. If you need to verify whether this temporary final rule impacts a benefit applicant for whom SAVE previously provided a response, please submit a new SAVE verification request. 

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Automatic EAD Extension Webpage and this USCIS News Alert provide additional information regarding this change.

04/10/2024

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Chinawe.com Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Man Keung Wai,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

Date: May 23, 2005

/s/ Man Keung Wai
Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Chinawe.com Inc. and will be
retained by Chinawe.com Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
```
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-08-466-CV

KATHY WILBURN	APPELLANT

	V.

SHAWN ANDRUS	APPELLEE

	------------

	FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Appellant Kathy Wilburn is attempting to appeal from the county court at law’s judgment in a case that originated in—and was appealed to the county court at law from—small claims court.  We do not have jurisdiction over this appeal.  Judgments in the county court at law on appeal from small claims court are final and not appealable to this court.  See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 28.053(d) (Vernon 2004); Gaskill v. Sneaky Enters., Inc., 997 S.W.2d 296, 297 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1999, pet. denied).  Appellant has not responded to our December 16, 2008 letter telling her that the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction if she did not show grounds for continuing the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 44.3.  Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f); Gaskill, 997 S.W.2d at 297.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL:  LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED:  February 19, 2009
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Covad Communications Group,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Charles E. Hoffman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18. U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                             COVAD COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC.

                             By:             /s/ CHARLES E. HOFFMAN
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                              Charles E. Hoffman
                                 President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

Date: May 6, 2005
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7536

DAVID L. BRADLEY,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

WARDEN MCKITHER BODISON,

Respondent – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. 

(0:09-cv-01856-TLW)

Submitted: December 16, 2010 Decided: December 29, 2010

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David L. Bradley, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Deputy 

Assistant Attorney General, William Edgar Salter, III, Assistant 

Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

David L. Bradley seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record and 

conclude that Bradley has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 
3

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Anray Lasard Woodard v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-12-00063-CR

Trial court case number: 11DCR057114A

Trial court: 268th District Court of Fort Bend County

Our complete review of the above-referenced appeal requires the court reporter’s 

transcription of the voir dire and punishment hearing portions of the trial. Accordingly, we order 

the court reporter to prepare, certify, and file a supplemental reporter’s record containing the voir 

dire and punishment hearing no later than 20 days from the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 34.6(d).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

 X Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: May 17, 2013
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 41585 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
DERRICK HARGROVE , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:14

- CR

- 872

- 1

Before JONES, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Derrick Hargrove raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Betancourt , 586 F.3d 303, 308

- 09 (5th Cir. 2009), which held that knowledge of drug type and quantity is not an element of a 21 U.S.C. § 841 offense

. Nor is knowledge of drug type and

quan tity an element of an offense under either 21 U.S.C. § 952 (a) or 21 U.S.C. § 960 (a)

. See United States v. Valencia

- Gonzales , 172 F.3d 344, 345

- 46 (5th

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 21 , 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-41585 Document: 00513557390 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2016No. 15

- 41585

2 Cir. 1999) ; United States v. Restrepo

- Granda , 57 5 F.2d 524, 527 (5th Cir. 1978)

. Accordingly, the motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Case: 15-41585 Document: 00513557390 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/21/2016
EXHIBIT 31.02
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Trust;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 (b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
 (c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
 E 4




---



##### 



(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 By:
    
    /s/ Gregory T. DonovanGregory T. DonovanChief Financial OfficerCampbell & Company, Inc.Managing OperatorThe Campbell Fund TrustNovember 14, 2008
 E 5