alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022361EN.01004301.xml

| 20.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 361/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 361/43

---

P9_TA(2022)0097

EU-Brazil Agreement on short-stay visa waiver for holders of diplomatic, service or official passports ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 24 March 2022 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Federative Republic of Brazil amending the Agreement between the European Union and the Federative Republic of Brazil on short-stay visa waiver for holders of diplomatic, service or official passports (13445/2018 — C9-0415/2021 — 2018/0086(NLE))

(Consent)

(2022/C 361/17)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (13445/2018), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (13445/2018),

| — | having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Union and the Federative Republic of Brazil amending the Agreement between the European Union and the Federative Republic of Brazil on short-stay visa waiver for holders of diplomatic, service or official passports (13446/2018), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Union and the Federative Republic of Brazil amending the Agreement between the European Union and the Federative Republic of Brazil on short-stay visa waiver for holders of diplomatic, service or official passports (13446/2018),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 77(2), point (a), and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C9-0415/2021), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 77(2), point (a), and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C9-0415/2021),

| — | having regard to Rule 105(1) and (4), and Rule 114(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 105(1) and (4), and Rule 114(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A9-0030/2022), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A9-0030/2022),

| 1. | Gives its consent to the conclusion of the agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Federative Republic of Brazil. |
| --- | --- |

2.

---
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-83,876-01

EX PARTE ELTON WADE RODGERS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 11-00321 IN THE 235 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM COOKE COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of indecency with

a child by contact and sentenced to five years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.

Applicant contends, among other things, that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance

because he misadvised Applicant about the meaning of his nolo contendere plea, leading him to

believe there would still be an adversarial test of the evidence. The habeas record contains no record

of admonishments, no judicial confession, no response from counsel, and no findings of fact. 

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,
2

466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these

circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294

(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court

shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The

trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. 

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. 

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the

performance of Applicant’s trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether counsel’s deficient

performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall make specific findings addressing how

counsel advised Applicant as to the meaning of his plea, and whether Applicant’s plea was voluntary

The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems

relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall

be obtained from this Court. 

Filed: October 7, 2015
3

Do not publish
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Westell Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal period ending December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on their knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company
     as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



/s/ E. VAN CULLENS
------------------
E. Van Cullens
Chief Executive Officer
February 9, 2004

/s/NICHOLAS C. HINDMAN, Sr.
---------------------------
Nicholas C. Hindman, Sr.
Chief Financial Officer
February 9, 2005


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Westell Technologies, Inc. and
will be retained by Westell Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be considered filed as
part of the Form 10-Q.
#### LOVE v. SEXTON.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July, 1896.)

Action by Henry M. Love, as receiver, against John B. Sexton.

No opinion. Motion granted with $10 costs.
# ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

April 26, 2024 CR-2023-0853 Johnny Ray Welch v. State of Alabama (Appeal from Houston Circuit Court: CC-08- 1694.62) 

## NOTICE You are hereby notified that on April 26, 2024, the following action was taken in the above-referenced cause by the Court of Criminal Appeals: Application for Rehearing Overruled.

D. Scott Mitchell, Clerk
Exhibit 10.8


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE


 


THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE (the “Amendment”)
is dated as of the 16th day of June, 2021 and is made by and between Belong Acquisition Corp. (the “Maker”)
and Belong Acquisition Sponsor, LLC (the “Payee”).


 


RECITALS


 


		A.	Maker executed that certain Promissory Note dated January 11, 2021 in the principal sum of up to Three Hundred Thousand dollars ($300,000)
(the “Note”).



 


		B.	The Note is scheduled to mature on June 30, 2021.



 


		C.	Maker and Payee have agreed to make certain amendments to the Note.



 


		D.	Unless otherwise set forth herein, all other provisions of the Note shall remain in full force and effect.



 


		E.	All capitalized terms not defined in this Amendment will have the meanings given to them in the Note.



 


In consideration of these promises, the mutual covenants contained
in this Amendment and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are acknowledged, the parties agree
as follows:


 


1. Section 1 of the Note
is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:


 


“Principal. The principal balance
of this Note shall be repayable on the earlier of: (a) the date on which Maker consummates its initial public offering (“IPO”)
and (b) September 30, 2021 (such earlier date, the “Maturity Date”).”


 


[SIGNATURES APPEAR
ON FOLLOWING PAGE]


 




     


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties
have caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of the date first above written.


 


	 	MAKER:
	 	 	 
	 	BELONG
    ACQUISITION CORP.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Peter Saldarriaga
	 	Name:	Peter Saldarriaga
	 	Title:	President and Chief
    Financial Officer
	 	 	 
	 	PAYEE:
	 	 	 
	 	BELONG
    ACQUISITION SPONSOR, LLC
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Jennifer Deason
	 	Name:  	Jennifer Deason
	 	Title: 	Sole Member


 


Signature page to First Amendment to Promissory
Note
**EXHIBIT31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I,Stuart J. Doshi, certify that:

1.     Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of GeoPetro Resources Company;

2.     Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)   Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

(b)   Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)   Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)   Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)   Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date: May 3, 2007 | /s/ Stuart J. Doshi                                       |   |
|-------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|              | Stuart J. Doshi,  President and Chief   Executive Officer |

 

----
#### *Ex parte*John, Admr. &c.

*Petition for Mandamus.*

Sam. Will John, for petitioner.

Garrett & Underwood, Lane & White and Tillman & Campbell, for appellee.

*666Opinion by

Tyson, J.

*665This was an original petition for *mandamus*filed in this court. The petitioner, claiming to be the administra*666tor *de bonis non*of the insolvent estate of George Lunsford, by appointment of the probate court of Jefferson county, filed his petition addressed to this court, asking for the issuance of a peremptory writ'of *mandamus*to the chancellor presiding over the chancery court of Jefferson county — which court had jurisdiction of said estate and its administration by decree, and which had before, on application for a receiver, made decrees refusing to admit the present petitioner, John, as a party to said proceedings appointing one F. W. Dixon receiver — requiring said chancellor “to vacate and set aside said decrees refusing to admit the petitioner to be a party to said cause, and commanding the chancellor to recognize him as the administrator *de bonis non*of the estate of George Lunsford, deceased.

The writ of *mandamus*was awarded on the authority of *Lunsford v.*Lunsford, ante, p. 242.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Charles R. Waldron, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report of Learning Tree International, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter December 28, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of the operations of Learning Tree International, Inc.

|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  |        |  |                        
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|                       |  |  | 
|Date: February 6, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ CHARLES R. WALDRON
|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  | Name:  |  | Charles R. Waldron     
|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Charter Municipal Mortgage Acceptance
Company  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  June 30, 2002 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"), I, Stuart J. Boesky, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


   (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Stuart J. Boesky


Stuart J. Boesky
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2002
# C_2021258EN.01000601.xml

| 2.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 258/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 258/6

---

Notice from the Croatian Energy Regulatory Agency on the public call for tenders for selection of gas supplier of last resort, to be published pursuant to Articles 61 and 62 of the Gas Market Act (‘Official Gazette’, No 18/18 and 23/20)

(2021/C 258/06)

Public call for tenders for selection of gas supplier of last resort has been published on 9 June 2021.

The accompanying documentation for the public call for tenders for selection of gas supplier of last resort has been published on the official website of the Croatian Energy Regulatory Agency (www.hera.hr).

---
#### Fernando ORTIZ-ROMERO, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-71034.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 20, 2011.*

Filed April 22, 2011.

Murray David Hilts, Law Offices of Murray D. Hilts, San Diego, CA, for Petitioner.

Rebecca Ariel Hoffberg, Esquire, Trial, Carol Federighi, Esquire, Senior Litigation Counsel, Yamileth G. Handuber, Trial, OIL, William Charles Peachey, Senior Litigation Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. LeFevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: RYMER, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Fernando Ortiz-Romero, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We grant the petition for review and remand.

The BIA denied Ortiz-Romero’s motion to reopen without the benefit of our decision in *Reyes-Torres v. Holder,*645 F.3d 1073, 2011 WL 1312570 (9th Cir.2011) (mandate pending), in which we concluded that 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(d) did not apply to preclude a motion to reopen filed after the petitioner had been removed. *See Reyes-Torres,*645 F.3d at 1075-78, 2011 WL 1312570, at *2-*3 (citing *Coyt v. Holder,*593 F.3d 902 (9th Cir.2010)). We remand to the BIA in light of this intervening case law.

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
### M A N D A T E

TO THE 432RD DISTRICT COURT of TARRANT COUNTY, GREE TINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, on the 16th day of October, 2014 , the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

ROGER ALAN SCOTT, Appellant,

v.

THE S TATE OF TEXAS Appellee.

CAUSE NO. 13

- 12

- 00671

- CR (Tr.Ct.No. 1264079D)

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this ca use on

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause

remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with its opinion.

We f urther order this decision certified below for observance.

October 16, 2014.



WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals

for th e Thirteenth District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Rogelio Valdez, Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals, with the seal thereof affixed, at the City of Edinburg, Texas this 23r d day of April, 2015.

Dorian E. Ramirez, CLERK
**EXHIBIT
23.1**
  **CONSENT
OF REGISTERED INDEPENDENT**
 **CERTIFIED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS**
  Board of
Directors
 Capital
Growth Systems, Inc.
  As
independent registered certified public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of Capital Growth Systems, Inc. for the year
ended December 31, 2004 of our report dated April 28, 2004 contained in the
Registration Statement Nos. 333-115250 on Form SB-2 under the Securities Act of
1933 insofar as such report relates to the financial statements of Capital
Growth Systems, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003.
  /s/
Russell and Atkins, PLC
 Russell
and Atkins, PLC
 Certified
Public Accountants
  Oklahoma
City, Oklahoma
  May 4,
2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                      5


<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
                                    
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1999
                                 
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
                               
<CASH>                                         176,040   
<SECURITIES>                                   2,176,109
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,251,211
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,598)   
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         35,614
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (11,027)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,813,446
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0   
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       477
<OTHER-SE>                                     518,996
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,813,446
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               152,971
<CGS>                                          0   
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               203,838
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               3,051   
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             121,522
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (175,440)   
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (67,261)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (108,231)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (108,231)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (2.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (2.33)
        


</TABLE>