alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Leacock v. Striker.

*(Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.*

July 18, 1890.)

Master and Servant—Discharge—Quantum Meruit.

An engineer, employed by the month, who has been discharged for negligence after working nine days, and who has refused a tender of half a month’s wages for his services, cannot recover for the services rendered on a *quantum meruit.*

Appeal from eleventh district court.

Action by Thomas Leacock against Elsworth L. Striker for an alleged unlawful discharge from defendant’s employment. The court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint, and he appeals.

Argued before Larremore, C. J., and Allen and Bookstaveb, JJ.

*Reynolds & Harrison,*for appellant. *Bliss & Schey, (John J. Lenehan,*of counsel,) for respondent.

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff, who was employed as an engineer, having been discharged, brought this action to recover, as damages, his wages for a month. The defense was a justification of the discharge, on the ground of plaintiff’s negligence and carelessness as engineer, and a counter-claim for damages arising from such negligence and carelessness. After hearing the testimony offered, the justice dismissed plaintiff’s complaint, and did not allow any part of defendant’s counter-claim. Hence plaintiff’s appeal. We have carefully examined the return, and the only question raised by it seems to be one of fact, and we think the evidence of negligence, although conflicting, quite sufficient to sustain the justice’s finding in that respect. But appellant contends that, even if this were so, inasmuch as he had worked for nine days during the month in which he was discharged he should have had a judgment for such services on a *quantum meruit.*But the return shows that, when discharged, he was tendered a half month’s wages for those days, which he refused. The judgment should therefore be affirmed, with costs.
#### Telmark, Inc., Appellant, v Lloyd T. Lavigne, Respondent.

Despite a creditor’s failure to give notice of sale of the security to the debtor, a creditor may still recover a deficiency judgment against the debtor by proving the amount of the debt, the fair market value of the security and the resulting deficiency *(Security Trust Co. v Thomas,*59 AD2d 242, 246-247). Here, plaintiff has established defendant’s default and the amount of the debt, and there is an issue of fact only as to the fair market value of the secured property. There being no issue other than the amount of damages, plaintiff is entitled to partial summary judgment on the issue of liability and the matter is remitted to Onondaga County Supreme Court for an assessment of damages *(see,*CPLR 3212 [c], [e]; *Chrysler Credit Corp. v Mitchell,*94 AD2d 971; *Flickinger Co. v 18 Genesee Corp.,*71 AD2d 382, 385-386). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Tenney, J. — summary judgment.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.
For more information about CGIS, visit our website at: 

https://www.uscg.mil/cgis

KEEPING THE MARITIME COMMUNITY SAFE

The Coast Guard Investigative Service (CGIS) 

relies on you to provide tips about suspected 

crimes affecting the maritime community.

That’s why CGIS has launched CGIS Tips, a web-based and mobile 

means to submit tips anonymously to CGIS criminal investigators.

What kinds of tips should I report? Any federal crime committed 

on or affecting the maritime community to include: polluting the oceans, 

rivers, bays and other navigable waters; illegal fi shing, maritime 

smuggling of weapons, narcotics, money, or humans, 

Merchant Mariner Credential Fraud; TWIC abuse/fraud, etc.

Download the CGIS Tips app from your 

mobile provider’s marketplace. 

You can also use this QR code to quickly 

access CGIS Tips using your smart device.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the annual report of Trycera Financial, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.


Date:  March 31, 2006

/s/ Bryan Kenyon
Bryan Kenyon, Chief Financial Officer
# C_2021453EN.01000401.xml

| 9.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 453/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 453/4

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10432 – PTTGC / Allnex)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 453/03)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | PTT Global Chemical Public Company Limited (‘PTTGC’, Thailand), belonging to group PTT Public Company Limited (Thailand), |
| --- | --- |

—

PTT Global Chemical Public Company Limited (‘PTTGC’, Thailand), belonging to group PTT Public Company Limited (Thailand),

| — | Allnex Holding GmbH (‘Allnex’, Germany), controlled by Advent International Corporation (US). |
| --- | --- |

—

Allnex Holding GmbH (‘Allnex’, Germany), controlled by Advent International Corporation (US).

PTTGC acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Allnex.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | for PTTGC: development, manufacture and supply of petrochemical and chemical products for a wide range of customers in downstream industries, |
| --- | --- |

—

for PTTGC: development, manufacture and supply of petrochemical and chemical products for a wide range of customers in downstream industries,

| — | for Allnex: development, production and supply of synthetic industrial coating resins. |
| --- | --- |

—

for Allnex: development, production and supply of synthetic industrial coating resins.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10432 – PTTGC / Allnex

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
# Appeals of Denied Petitions Under the Jurisdiction of the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) by Form Number

www.uscis.gov

01/08/2024

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
Exhibit 13.1

HOLMES FINANCING (NO. 7) PLC4645659

ABBEY NATIONAL HOUSE2 TRITON SQUARE, REGENTS PLACELONDON NW1 3AN

CertificationPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of the servicer does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:


The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the Form
20-F) of Holmes Financing (No. 7) PLC (the Company) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


|Dated:  June
          27, 2006 | /s/
            Chris Fielding                        
|------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|                                | Chris
          Fielding                              
|                                | Head
          of Securitisation and Treasury Advisory
|                                | Services                                              

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


---
#### Encarnacion AGUILAR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dwight NEVEN and Attorney General of the State of Nevada, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 09-17347.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted March 14, 2011.

Filed March 23, 2011.

Encarnación Aguilar, Indian Springs, NV, pro se.

*621Paul G. Turner, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Las Vegas, NV, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Michael Bongard, Deputy Attorney General, Attorney Generals Office, Ely, NV, for Respondents-Appellees.

Before: WALLACE, NOONAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Encarnación Aguilar (“Aguilar”) appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition. He argues that, in violation of the Sixth Amendment, he was denied a speedy trial. We affirm, for the reasons stated by the district court.

Aguilar also seeks a certificate of appealability (“COA”) regarding whether his appellate counsel was ineffective in failing to argue the indictment was untimely. We deny the COA, for the reasons stated by the district court.

AFFIRMED and DENIED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of
American Physicians Capital, Inc. (the "Company"), for purposes of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: March 13, 2007


/s/ R. Kevin Clinton
-------------------------------------
R. Kevin Clinton
President and Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Frank H. Freund
-------------------------------------
Frank H. Freund
Senior Executive Vice President,
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
#### Salvatore T. Crino, Respondent, v Arthur Lachiusa et al., Defendants, and Sy Lachiusa, Appellant.

— Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated at Chautauqua County Court, Adams, J. (Appeal from judgment of Chautauqua County Court, Adams, J. — summary judgment.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION









<PAGE>
                                  Exhibit 32.2

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Annual Report of 30DC, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K
for the period ending June 30, 2012, as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, Theodore A. Greenberg, Principal
Accounting Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 USC section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: June 3, 2013

/s/ Theodore A. Greenberg
---------------------------------------------
Theodore A. Greenberg
Principal Accounting Officer and Chief Financial Officer


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of China BAK
Battery, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Ke Marcus Cui, the Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Ke Marcus CuiKe MARCUS CUIInterimChief Financial Officer

December 14, 2010

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to China BAK Battery, Inc. and will be retained by China
BAK Battery, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 1, 2011 

p0525 

Order 

 

June 1, 2011 

142133 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142133 

 COA: 299874 

Berrien CC: 2009-002699-FH 

JOHN AMOS ROBINSON, III, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 1, 2010 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Trust;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
 E 2




---



##### 



(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 By:                     /s/ Theresa D. BecksTheresa D. BecksChief Executive Officer
Campbell & Company, Inc.
Managing Operator
The Campbell Fund TrustAugust 14, 2008 E 3
EXHIBIT
32.1





Certification
of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








I, Jeffry
N. Quinn, Chief Executive Officer of Solutia Inc. (the “Company”), certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that to the best of my knowledge:








(1)
            the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
      ended June 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








Dated:
July 30, 2008








/s/ Jeffry N.
Quinn


Jeffry N. Quinn


President,
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board














A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Solutia Inc. and will be retained by
Solutia Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
#               I-956K, Registration for Direct and Third-Party Promoters

Each person acting as a direct or third-party promoter (including migration agents) of the following must complete Form I-956K:
                  - A regional center;
                  - Any new commercial enterprises;
                  - An affiliated job-creating entity; or
                  - An issuer of securities intended to be offered to immigrant investors in connection with a particular capital investment project.

Each person completing a Form I-956K must answer all questions as indicated on the form.

## Forms and Document Downloads

Form I-956K  (PDF, 508.9 KB)

Instructions for Form I-956K  (PDF, 1013.08 KB)

## Form Details

04/01/24. Starting June 3, 2024, we will accept only the 04/01/24 edition. Until then, you can also use the 07/24/23 edition. You can find the edition date at the bottom of the page on the form and instructions.

Dates are listed in mm/dd/yy format.

If you complete and print this form to mail it, make sure that the form edition date and page numbers are visible at the bottom of all pages and that all pages are from the same form edition. If any of the form’s pages are missing or are from a different form edition, we may reject your form.

If you need help downloading and printing forms, read our instructions. 

**U.S. Postal Service (USPS):**

USCISAttn: I-956KP.O. Box 660168Dallas, TX 75266-0168

**FedEx, UPS, and DHL deliveries:**

USCISAttn: I-956K (Box 660168)2501 S. State Highway 12, 1 Business Suite 400Lewisville, TX 75067-8003

You can find the filing fee for Form I-956K by visiting our Fee Schedule page.

**Filing Tips:** Review our Tips for Filing Forms by Mail page for information on how to ensure we will accept your form.

**Don’t forget to sign your form.** We will reject any unsigned form.

                      - EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program

04/01/2024

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.