alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of AboveNet, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph P.
Ciavarella, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:  February 6,
      2009
              By:
              /s/
      Joseph P. CiavarellaJoseph
      P. Ciavarella
                Chief
      Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-11512 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GEORGE AUBIN, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Northern District of Texas (3:93-CR-057-T)

January 12, 1998

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, HIGGINBOTHAM and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

George Aubin appeals from the de nial of his motion for a new trial under

Fed.R.Crim.P. 33. His motion to file a corrected reply brief is GRANTED.

Aubin maintains that newly-discovered evidence, the government’s1 373 U.S. 83 (1963).

2 See United States v. Aubin , No. 3:93-CR-0057-T (N.D.Tex. Nov. 25, 1996).

2 suppress ion of such evidence in violation of B rady v. Maryland, 1 and the

government’s use of false evidence entitle him to a new trial. He also contends that

the district court erred by failing to conduct an evidentiary hearing on his motion.

Our review of the record discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, the judgment

appealed is AFFIRMED for essentially the reasons stated by the district court. 2
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of ImproveNet, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), for the quarterly period ended March 31,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report") I, Homayoon J. Farsi, Co-Chairman, President and Acting Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m(a)
          or 78o(d)): and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

ImproveNet, Inc.

/s/Homayoon J. Farsi
------------------------------------
Homayoon J. Farsi, Co-Chairman, President
and Acting Chief Financial Officer

Dated: May 17, 2004
.

:

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN



### BonereblrDorumnXirkrlr CoaatyAttormy Wharton 

### county nmrtoa, 

### fuar Dur tart

88 ha+8 ?8orl+84 you l 8k **tho opfnlon**  **of thir**  tiont **pmdent** Bohool Dlrtriat 

### up118

## l

ttuiciry orore balng all
l a0 r pidadr o? t18a of 80 1& 18Fw**. .**  **‘ ,,**  **;-? c**  **.-)**

A8 

### you pOlat44 

### t?Ut la pur brld, la 

### the aerr of Tupe InQ4,psndgnt Sohool.

f;istrlot,



### 97 **9. s.**  **(24)** 1047,(W. Ref.)'t.hIs

provision ~80 held to be applloabls to al1 tfper 8. of indep8nd8nt 6OhOQ1 dintriots.

**Zn** Volu;le37 of **Tare6 JurIapru4entm,**  **fag08 lOb** * 1070, it I8 **said1**

Wherr 8X8lUII1Ve

otitFO1 

### at tb. pub110 **Q@bO818** 

### of 8 

## oity or **Ulstrlat** lr &iv~,n to ita board ot **s4uoation** or tru8tBea, with power to eatablleh all **rU ’** **LQ8 8ml**  **reguh tiQh** **’ I8**  **XIm8688Ery to**  **X8fISt%fn 413**  **&ffefQnt 878tsl,**  **8w** rogiul~tioa

**fAtQttd84** mb re88ombl~ Otienl8t84 **to** prevent t&e fntroductlor! or s rmU di88666, 8UQh *II f of a 

### eeatagioua 8ad 4r~mvnt8

Mnl pOX, Sohool b48rd8 l8 **W411 Withia**  t&4 pm-8 pmteQ. **or** the aftairm of 

### 0~69adninIstzwtlon r4pufrr the VaOaiMtfon ot pupils *I f~ oanditbo prsoadent to thlr **SttQi?h.ll88. And**  **W48l ’**  their pw to @naab adfxira088 for the 

### proteotioa of health, Z#&&rlatire b&lea o? aualolpalitier may deny 6hIldren the ii&ht to attoad 8obos1 tiosr **Treainatad.** Ordlnaaoer rcrd

### r4gttletioaa of thl8 MtUX8 are not in oontrsreatlen at **ISOti8tftUtiOttitl** &taranti88, l 0r &O they iXitWfOl?8 **With the**  **0~8JlntiOS at**  **th0** o4mpubOrf rohaol law. 

### Her are the raguletiotm 

### objaotltm**8ble On**  tha -mud tbnt 130eS&br~Uiay **ui8t8; it**  **18** not l **qusatioa of**  **WQr~QnOy, but**  **I** qU88tboa **Wh4th4P** the b48rd.8 l 6tlon 16 ar bitrary. "'lt Is not BW4J68aXy for Ba **4pia4m.h** t4 WI8t or be fmminult In otiex for the rob-1 .board to be jwtli~sb In ado,-tin&

and sntoraing t&s rqplatio~
. . . 

### lf **the** e~aaUItIaor

are suoh that they eQn8tftut4 a aQnao8 to the publio health.'" That the bOePd of ’ **tFU8tQQ8 Of**  **aa** ftldspsad~t **8QhQOl** dietriot lpoy under Itn sathority to mtna~g8 mQ aontrol the **public** 8OhW1s In sueb di8triOt ?'O$uiZ'6 7a@4iXWtf46 Of **PUP118 a8**  a prarcpfsitc tQ thrlr atte!xdanoe of ruoh roboo18 ha8 **been** aotsr&nsd In the iOllowlrt,- alllmt Strft*l et 

### al. t. Ban haton &h-l. Bd3x4 of Yrlnoatlon at el., 2f;l 8. iv.Llj&(8.%Ret~ 1 Clt? g,yi Eh'aunrel8

at al. v. ?irld~olmIdt at al., 109 TIXI 302,

. ::,303r Johnso* et al. v'te1ty 2r 3allas at al., 291 s.i;. 972. (a, 2. 3i8i8a.) ft 1.8 not acoasaary th:& aa anreriwncy crxiet: it $8 e quccatfon whsthsr tha slatIon of tha, boar4 ia aequlpln(al raoolmttlon IS rns8anab18. Booth et 81. v* Board of ?auaqtion of Port .<orth Ir;dapendmt 3501 (a.r;.Cia&l.) i!ueht v. "lag et al. 

### Ftn. for Certiorari, dirk!ad., 25? V.Sa- 

## 580

ROVXO APR 27, 1942 AmoR6Fx fB!lmu. w T3xAi

FIRST ASS-&ANT ATTORNEY GEITERAL
BANSAL & CO
                                                        CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
S-8 (SEC File No. 333-135124) of Caneum, Inc. of our report dated March 20,
2008, relating to our audit of the financial statements of Caneum India
Private Limited (Formerly known as Continuum Systems Private Limited), a
subsidiary of Caneum, Inc., for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006,
included in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.


M/S Bansal & Co.
Chartered Accountants

/s/ D. S. Rawat
D.S. Rawat, Partner

New Delhi (India)
5th June, 2008
**EXHIBIT
      32**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the annual report of Capital Growth Systems, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Thomas G.Hudson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, Derry L. Behm,
      the Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify to the
      best of my knowledge, pursuant to l8 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      April 20, 2007


By:
            /s/
              Thomas G. HudsonName: Thomas
                G. HudsonTitle: Chief
                Executive Officer




By:
            /s/
              Derry L. BehmName: Derry
                L. BehmTitle: Chief
                Financial and Accounting Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




The
      foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as an exhibit to the Report and
      is
      not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
      document.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Frederic Carpenter, Appellant, v Michael Corcoran, Respondent.

Submitted April 9, 2007;

decided June 7, 2007

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of Smith Barney Potomac Futures Fund L.P. (the"Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the periodending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, David J. Vogel, President and Director of Citigroup Managed FuturesLLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|           |                                                                                                                     |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)  | The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and |

|           |                                                                                                                                                        |
|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)  | The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Partnership. |

/s/ David J.Vogel                        

DavidJ. VogelCitigroup Managed Futures LLC President andDirector     

Date: November 12,2004

----
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

         I, Alberto DiBella, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Enviro Voraxial
Technology, Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

            (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
         disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
         us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this report is being prepared;

            (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
         controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
         about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
         of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
         evaluation; and

            (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
         most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
         the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
         reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting; and

         5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditor and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

            (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
         design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
         are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

            (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
         internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 11, 2004

/s/ Alberto DiBella
-----------------------
Alberto DiBella
Chief Executive Officer
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 18

- 1867 V

UNPUBLISHED

AMY JORDAN

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: December 23, 2019

Special Processing Unit (SPU) ;

Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine

Administration (SIRVA)

Le ah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC , for

petitioner.

Jeffrey T. Sprague , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On December 6, 2018

, Amy Jordan filed a petition for compensation under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

. , 2 (the

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine

administration ( “ SIRVA ” ) as a result of an influenza ( “ flu ” ) vaccination administered on

December 13, 2017 . Petit ion at 1 . The case was assigned to the Special Processing

Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On December 23, 2019

, R espondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he

concedes that P etitioner is entitled to compensa tion in this case. Respondent’s Rule

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am

required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Managemen t and Promotion of

Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to

the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to

redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of

privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such

material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 19 86, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755

. Hereinafter, for

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. §

300aa (2012 ).2

4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, R espondent “ has concluded that petitioner suffered a

T able SIRVA injury. ” Id. at 6 . Respondent further agrees that Petitioner suffered the

residual effects of her condition for more than six months

. Id.

In view of R espondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that

P etitioner is entitle d to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
USCIRF Opening Remarks, Religious Freedom in Southeast Asia 1

U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom Hearing

Religious Freedom in Southeast Asia: Techno-Authoritarianism and 

Transnational Influences

Opening Remarks as prepared for delivery

Stephen Schneck, USCIRF Commissioner

Thank you, Vice Chair, Davie. I would like to join in welcoming everyone to 

today’s hearing. 

As has been mentioned by my colleagues, ASEAN countries are increasingly using 

new technologies to bolster authoritarian practices and consolidate power, often at 

the expense of religious minorities and religious expression. Unfortunately, 

powerful countries that have pioneered and perfected these kinds of authoritarian 

practices are now using their weight and influence to see these practices replicated 

in Southeast Asia. 
USCIRF Opening Remarks, Religious Freedom in Southeast Asia 2

For example, the Chinese government is a leading player in implementing and 

promoting techno-authoritarianism at home and abroad. Domestically, Chinese 

authorities have aggressively employed “smart city” technologies— including 

artificial intelligence (AI), big data, biometric collection, and facial, voice, and gait 

recognition—to carry out mass surveillance. They target Christians, Falun Gong 

practitioners, and ethno-religious groups like Uyghurs and Tibetans. The 

government exports its “smart city” technologies and underlying technoauthoritarian approach to Southeast Asia and around the world.

I look forward to hearing from our witnesses With that, I now pass the floor back 

to Chair Cooper.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 78 (Friday, April 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21405-21406]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9947]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. OA97-111-001, OA97-112-001 and OA97-124-001]


Cinergy Services, Inc.; Notice of Filing

April 14, 2000.
    Take notice that on March 20, 2000, Cinergy Services, Inc. 
(Cinergy), as agent for and on behalf of the Cinergy Operating 
Companies, PSI Energy, Inc. and The Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company, 
submitted its compliance filing pursuant to the Commission's February 
29, 2000 Order in Allegheny Power Service Company, et al., 90 FERC 
para. 61,224.
    Cinergy states that it has served a copy of its filing upon Hoosier 
Energy Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc., Southern Indiana Gas and 
Electric Company and Indiana Municipal Power Agency.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888

[[Page 21406]]

First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 
211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on 
or before April 24, 1999. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-9947 Filed 4-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Westell Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that based on their knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for the
periods covered in the Report.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Richard S. Gilbert 
|Richard S. Gilbert     
|Chief Executive Officer
|October 22, 2010       
|                       
|/s/ Brian S. Cooper    
|Brian S. Cooper        
|Chief Financial Officer
|October 22, 2010       

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to Westell Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Westell Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.