alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Adoption Information: Montenegro

#### Archived Content

The information on this page is out of date. However, some of the content may still be useful, so we have archived the page.

##  USCIS Begins Processing Adoptions from Montenegro

*Intercountry Adoptions under the Hague Adoption Convention*

On April 1, 2014, USCIS will begin accepting and adjudicating Hague Convention on Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption (Hague Adoption Convention) petitions filed on behalf of children from Montenegro.

The Department of State has determined that Montenegro’s intercountry adoption system supports:
                - Certification from consular officers confirming that adoption decrees or custody orders obtained in Montenegro for a child habitually resident in Montenegro have been issued in compliance with the Hague Adoption Convention, and
                - Issuance of Hague Adoption or Custody certificates for eligible children on a case-by-case basis. 

## What This Means for U.S. Prospective Adoptive Parents

To pursue a Hague Convention adoption in Montenegro after April 1, 2014, you must file the following forms with USCIS: 
                - Form I-800A, Application for Determination of Suitability to Adopt a Child from a Convention Country , to determine your eligibility and suitability to adopt a child from a Convention country, and 
                -  Form I-800, Petition to Classify Convention Adoptee as an Immediate Relative , on behalf of a child habitually resident in Montenegro after your Form I-800A application is approved. 

## Background

The Hague Adoption Convention, which entered into force in the United States on April 1, 2008, protects the welfare of children, birth parents and adoptive parents in intercountry adoptions. As of that date, new intercountry adoptions between the United States and other Hague Adoption Convention countries must comply with Hague Adoption Convention standards. Montenegro acceded to the Convention on March 9, 2012, and the Convention entered into force in Montenegro on July 1, 2012.

At the time the Hague Adoption Convention entered into force in Montenegro, the United States determined that it would not be able to process Hague Adoption Convention cases involving the intercountry adoption of children habitually resident in Montenegro. In June 2013, Montenegro passed legislation which established an effective Hague Adoption Convention process. In the United States, Hague Adoption Convention cases are processed using the USCIS Form I-800A application and Form I-800 petition.

## How to Find More Information

Please visit www.uscis.gov/adoption and www.adoption.state.gov for the most up-to-date information on the intercountry adoption process in Montenegro.

01/29/2020

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
1 The Honorable E. Richard Webber, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 03-1331

___________ Darius J. Whitson, Sr., * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Mary Ann L. Medler, Judge; David D. * Eastern District of Missouri. Noce, Judge, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: April 1, 2004 Filed: April 9, 2004

___________ Before MELLOY, HANSEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Darius Whitson appeals the district court’s 1 preservice dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) of his complaint seeking the removal of two magistrate judges. Following de novo review, see Moore v. Sims , 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam), we agree with the district court that dismissal was appropriate. Accordingly, we affirm under 8th Circuit Rule 47B. We also grant Whitson leave to-2- proceed in forma pauperis, and we remand for the district court to assess and collect the appellate filing fee.

______________________________
#### Doe *vs.*Roe.

York.

Opinion March 27, 1890.

*Married Woman. Crim. eon.*

A wife can not maintain an action against another woman, for debauching and carnally knowing her husband.

On exceptions.

The defendant demurred to the declaration which charged her with having alienated the affections of plaintiff’s husband, etc.

*James A.*JEdgerly, for plaintiff.

*W. L. Putnam and W. 8.*Pierce, for defendant.

Walton, J.

This is an action by a married woman against another woman. The plaintiff has alleged in her declaration that the defendant debauched and carnally knew her husband, thereby alienating his affection and depriving her of his comfort, society, and support.

The question is whether such an action is maintainable. For such a wrong the law does not leave the injured wife without redress. She may obtain a divorce and a restoration of all her property, real and personal, and in addition thereto, alimony or an allowance out of her husband’s estate. And the law will punish the guilty parties criminally. But does the law, in addition to these remedies, secure to her a right of action to recover a pecuniary compensation from her husbaiid’s paramour? We think not. We have been referred to no reliable authority for the existence of such a right, and we can find none.

It is true that a husband may maintain an action for the seduction of his wife. But such an action has grounds on which to rest that can not be invoked in support of a similar action in favor of the wife. A wife’s infidelity may impose upon her husband the support of another man’s child. And what is still worse, it may throw suspicion upon the legitimacy of his own *504children; A husband’s infidelity can inflict no such consequences upon his wife. If she remains virtuous, no suspicion can attach to the legitimacy of her children. And an action in favor of the husband for the seduction of his wife has been regarded'as of doubtful expediency. ^ It has been abolished in England. (Bouv. Diet., title, Crim. Con.) And the trials we have had1 in this country 'of such actions are not very encouraging. They seem to be better calculated to inflict pain upon the innocent members of the families of the parties than to secure redress to the persons injured. And we fear such would be the result if such actions were maintainable by wives. Such a power would furnish them with the means of inflicting untold misery upon others with little hope of redress for themselves. At any rate, we are satisfied that the law never has, and does hot now, secure to wives such a power, and if it is deemed wise that they should have it, the legislature and not the court must give it to them.

*.iExceptions overruled.*

*Demurrer sustained.*

*Declaration adjudged had.*

Peters, C. J., Virgin, Emery, Foster and Haskell, JJ., concurred.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 18-11

IN RE: COURT CLOSED ON FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 2011; FRIDAY, DECEMBER 23, 2011; AND

FRIDAY, DECEMBER 30, 2011

O R D E R

By direction of the Chief Judge, the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims will

be closed on Friday, November 25, 2011; Friday, December 23, 2011; and Friday, December 30,

2011.

For purposes of computation of time and motions to enlarge time under the Court's Rules of

Practice and Procedure, Friday, November 25, 2011; Friday, December 23, 2011; and Friday,

December 30, 2011, will be considered days when the Court is closed. See U.S. VET. APP. R.

26(a)(1).

DATED: October 21, 2011 FOR THE COURT:

/s/Gregory O. Block

GREGORY O. BLOCK

Clerk of the Court
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 20959]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9769]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. TM00-1-25-002]


Mississippi River Transmission Corporation; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

April 13, 2000.
    Take notice that on April 7, 2000, Mississippi River Transmission 
Corporation (MRT) tendered for filing as apart of its Gas Tariff, Third 
Revised Volume No. 1, the sheets listed below to become effective June 
1, 2000:

Substitute Thirty Fourth Revised Sheet No. 5
Substitute Thirty Fourth Revised Sheet No. 6
Substitute Thirty First Revised Sheet No. 7
Substitute Eleventh Revised Sheet No. 8

    MRT states that the purpose of this filing is to adjust the Fuel 
Use and Loss Percentages under its Rate Schedules FTS, SCT, ITS, FSS 
and ISS pursuant to Section 22 of the General Terms and Conditions of 
its FERC Gas Tariff and the Commission's order in Docket No. TM00-1-25-
000. MRT further states, subject to the Commission's authorization, the 
filing will replace and supersede the tariff filing made by MRT on 
October 1, 1999 in Docket No. TM00-1-25-000.
    MRT states that a copy of this filing is being mailed to each of 
the parties to this proceeding, its customers and to the state 
commissions of Arkansas, Illinois, and Missouri.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on 
or before April 28, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-9769 Filed 4-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Security Intelligence
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Ben Jamil, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Chris R.
Decker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
to the best of my knowledge and belief that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: October 12, 2005


                                        /s/ Ben Jamil
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Ben Jamil, Chief Executive Officer


                                        /s/ Chris R. Decker
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Chris R. Decker, Chief Financial Officer

This certification shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# New Employee Information and Forms

We're excited that you have joined us in our mission, to secure America’s promise as a nation of immigrants by overseeing lawful immigration to the United States. Your process of joining USCIS begins here and continues with an official onboarding program that your office has prepared for you.

This webpage provides information on what you need to do before you report; what you need to bring on your first day; and your benefits, pay, and leave as well as other information to help you make a smooth transition to your new career with USCIS.
                - Forms to complete and return before you report : Download, complete and return these forms to USCIS Human Resources before you report.
                - Forms to complete and bring on your first day : Learn about the forms you must download, complete and bring with you on your first day.
                - Benefits : Read about your federal benefits, including time frames for enrolling in benefits and how to designate beneficiaries.
                - Pay and leave
                - Additional New Employee Resources

Please refer to your welcome letter for reporting instructions for your first day.

If you have any questions, please use our Human Resources email box or reach out to the HR specialist or assistant named on your tentative offer letter.

Also, please send us any feedback about this website through our USCIS Webmaster email box.

Welcome to USCIS!

05/22/2020

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
**Exhibit      32**

**CERTIFICATION      OF PERIODIC REPORT**

|   | (1) | the                Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended                June                30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section                13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C 78m                or                78o(d)); and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                Geoffrey Donaldson  |
|----------------------------------------|
| Geoffrey                Donaldson      |
| Chief                Executive Officer |

|   | (1) | the                Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended                June                30, 2008(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section                13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C 78m                or                78o(d)); and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                Karen Nazzareno |
|------------------------------------|
| Karen                Nazzareno     |
| Controller                         |

----
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 6020** 

THOMAS A. CHILTON, III , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. LORETTA KELLY, Warden , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond
. James R. Spencer , District Judge. ( 3:10

- cv - 00871

- JRS )

Submi t ted : May 24, 2012 Decided: May 30, 2012

Before MOTZ and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Thomas A. Chilton, III, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Eldridge Jeffrey, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM: Thomas A. Chilton, III, seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitution al right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is deb atable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling i s debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Chilton has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Chilton’s motions for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the3 materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, John
C. Corey, President and Chief Executive Officer of Stoneridge, Inc. (the
“Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  the
report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended March 31,
2009 (“the Report”) which this certification accompanies fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and





(2)  the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      John C. CoreyJohn
      C. Corey, President and Chief Executive OfficerMay
      6, 2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Henry J. Boucher, Jr., certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/Aof IWT Tesoro Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2006;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer andI am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and wehave:

a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986;

c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and

d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalyear that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

a)All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controlswhich could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’sauditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls overfinancial reporting.
| Date: April 3, 2007 | By:                                   | /s/ Henry  J. Boucher, Jr. |
|---------------------|---------------------------------------|---------------------------------|
|                | Henry J. Boucher, Jr.,           |
|                | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Market Central, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Clifford A. Clark,
VP of Finance, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                                   /s/ Clifford A. Clark
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Clifford A. Clark
                                                   Chief Financial Officer

July 20, 2005