alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          Exhibit 11
              SPACEHAB, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
              COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

                                                                           Three Months
                                                                        Ended September 30,
                                                                       1998           1997
                                                                   ------------   ------------
Net income and adjusted earnings:
  Net income applicable to
     common shareholders used for
<S>                                                                       <C>            <C>
     basic computations ........................................   $    413,213   $ (5,654,141)
  Dilution adjustments:
  Savings in convertible note payable
    interestexpense net of tax .................................        775,867           --
                                                                   ------------   ------------
  Adjusted net income applicable to
    common shareholders assuming dilution ......................      1,189,080     (5,654,141)
                                                                   ============   ============
Average number of shares of common stock
    used for basic computation .................................     11,168,161     11,146,660
   Diluted adjustments (1):
      Weighted average shares and share equivalents outstanding:
      Assumed exercise of options and
       warrants ................................................        184,532        242,407
      Assumed conversion of convertible debt ...................      4,642,202           --
                                                                   ------------   ------------
Total number of shares assumed to be
   outstanding assuming dilution ...............................     15,994,895     11,389,067
                                                                   ============   ============
Earnings common per share:
Income per common share:
   Net Income per share - Basic ................................   $       0.04   ($      0.51)
                                                                   ============   ============
   Net Income per share - Diluted (1) ..........................           0.07          (0.50)
                                                                   ============   ============
</TABLE>

(1)The  assumed   exercise  of  options  and  warrants  and  the  conversion  of
   convertible  debt are anti-dilutive  but are included in the  calculation  of
   dilutive  earnings  per  share in  accordance  with  Regulation  S-K Item 601
   (a)(11).
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Allen Harper, Appellant.

Submitted January 18, 2007;

decided February 13, 2007

Motion for reargument denied *[see*7 NY3d 882].

Judge Jones taking no part.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Manuel Rivera, Also Known as Angel Rivera, Appellant.

Submitted April 30, 2007;

decided May 3, 2007

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Robert S. Dean, Esq., Center for Appellate Litigation, 74 Trinity Place, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10006 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Coast GuardU.S. Department of Homeland Security

Search
Search

Search

-  Home    -  News Room             
  -  Reserve             
  -  Forcecom             
  -  Operations             
  -  Mission Support             
  -  Atlantic Area             
  -  Pacific Area             
  -  History 
-  Units    -  Organization             
  -  Coast Guard A to Z             
  -  Atlantic Area             
  -  Pacific Area             
  -  Force Readiness Command 
-  Leadership    -  Commandant’s Initiatives             
  -  Senior Leadership             
  -  Deputy Commandant for Operations             
  -  Deputy Commandant for Mission Support             
  -  Atlantic Area Commander             
  -  Pacific Area Commander             
  -  Reserve             
  -  Auxiliary 
-  Resources    -  CG Support             
  -  Legal      -  JoinCGJAG             
    -  Legal_Assistance        -  Find-A-Legal-Assistance-Lawyer             
      -  FAQ 
  -  Civil Rights             
  -  Work-Life             
  -  Administrative Law Judges      -  Virtual Hearing 
  -  Newsroom             
  -  Family             
  -  Library             
  -  CG Web Mail             
  -  Return 2 Service      -  FAQ 
-  Community    -  Art Program             
  -  Girl Scouts / Boy Scouts      -  Eagle Scout Recognition 
  -  Coast Guard Band             
  -  Coast Guard Cities             
  -  Honor Guard             
  -  JROTC      -  NEWS 
  -  Special Programs      -  Industry Academy        -  Contacts             
      -  2018 
  -  Trademark             
  -  Resources      -  History             
    -  CGC Eagle 
-  Mariners    -  National Vessel Documentation Center             
  -  National Maritime Center             
  -  National Pollution Funds Center      -  NRD        -  NRD_FAQs             
      -  Trustee_Links             
      -  NRD_DOCS             
      -  About_NRD_Funding 
  -  Boating Safety 
-  doing business		 
-  Join		 
-  Recruiting		 
-  contact		 
-  About		 

HomeResourcesAdministrative Law JudgesDecisionsALJ Decisions 2019

**ALJ Decisions: 2019**

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

**

                      - FOIA
                      - Privacy Policy
                      - MHS Notice of Privacy Practices
                      - Accessibility
                      - No FEAR
                      - Whistleblower Protection
                      - U.S. Department of Homeland Security
                      - DHS Office of Inspector General
                      - WhiteHouse.gov
                      - USA.gov

### Stay Connected

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
----

**Exhibit 10.89**

Summary of Loan Agreement Entered into byand between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. ("the Company") and Shenzhen Longgang Branch, Bank of China (the "Creditor") Dated July 17, 2009 

Main articles: 

- Contract number:  (2009)Zhenzhongyin Ganghuilizi 052;  Loan principal: JPY  296,604,000; 
Loan Term: from July 17, 2009  to July 20, 2010; 
Interest rate: fixed at  0.74375%; Interest settlement day      is the maturity date of the loan; 
Penalty interest rate for      delayed repayment is 2.23%; 
- If any of the following  occurs, the Creditor is entitled to demand prepayment of loan principal and  interest before maturity and cancel all loans unprovided:   Delay in repayment of      loan interest and the loan principal; 
The Company provides      untrue declaration or breaks promise; 
The Company breaks other      agreements with respect to its obligation; 
-  Breach of  contract penalties: release loan agreement, demand prepayment of loan  principal and interest before maturity; withdraw from any accounts of the  Company the loan principal, interest and other fees; any other measures the  Creditor believes necessary and possible, etc. Amount of collateral:  RMB21,624,000 
**Headlines of the articles omitted**
- Loan arrangement  Interest clearing of the loan  
Fee 
Payment of the loan 
Guarantee 
Declaration and Promise of  the Company 
Other agreements 
Modification, Amendment and  Termination of Contract 
Disputation settlement 
Attachment 
Validity 
Text 
Notice
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Infinium Software, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned,
William B. Gerraughty, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section1350, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ William B. Gerraughty, Jr.


William B. Gerraughty, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer
August 12, 2002
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Kenneth Hahn, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of QuinStreet, Inc.; and

2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report.

Date: February 19, 2013



/s/ Kenneth HahnKenneth HahnChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) and Chief Operating Officer
# CI2021282EN.01000601.xml

| 14.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 282/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 282/6

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2021/C 282 I/02)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

| Date and time of closure | 28.4.2021 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 28.4.2021 - 31.12.2021 |
| Member State | Greece |
| Stock or Group of stocks | BFT/AE45WM (including BFT/*641, BFT/*643, BFT/*8301, BFT/*8302 and BFT/*8303F) |
| Species | Bluefin tuna (Thunnus Thynnus) |
| Zone | Atlantic Ocean, east of 45° W, and Mediterranean |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | -- |
| Reference number | 12/TQ92 |

Date and time of closure

28.4.2021

Duration

28.4.2021 - 31.12.2021

Member State

Greece

Stock or Group of stocks

BFT/AE45WM (including BFT/*641, BFT/*643, BFT/*8301, BFT/*8302 and BFT/*8303F)

Species

Bluefin tuna (Thunnus Thynnus)

Zone

Atlantic Ocean, east of 45° W, and Mediterranean

Type(s) of fishing vessels

--

Reference number

12/TQ92

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

---
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.23

                  DESCRIPTION OF UNWRITTEN SUBLEASE ARRANGEMENT
                             EAST LANSING, MICHIGAN

         American Physicians Assurance Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of
American Physicians Capital, Inc. (the "Company"), leases 21,950 square feet of
office space from Sam Eyde Construction Company in a building located at 2501
North Coolidge in East Lansing, Michigan. The lease commenced in May 1999 and
runs through April 30, 2004 with two five-year renewal options. The Company pays
$19.00 per square foot to the lessor under the lease, subject to CPI increase
after the first five years. SCW Agency Group, Inc. is permitted to use a total
of 10,208 square feet of the office space leased by the Company under the same
terms and conditions to which the Company is subject and is charged $19.00 per
square foot for the space it is permitted to use. The Company and SCW have not
established any term for the arrangement, which can be terminated by either
party at any time.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

SEPT 3, 2008

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 08-10719

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 07-00322-CR-T-23-MSS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

ROBERTO M. FERRO, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(September 3, 2008)

Before BLACK, BARKETT and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Ryan Thomas Truskoski, appointed counsel for Roberto M. Ferro, has
2

moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief

pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493

(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s

assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent

examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s

motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Kilgore’s conviction and sentence are

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 10.54**

**Summary of Loan Agreement by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Eastern Branch, Agricultural Bank of China dated August 23, 2006.**

| **Summary of the main articles**    |
|-------------------------------------|
| •                              | Contract   number: No. 81101200600001410 |
| •                              | Loan   Principal: RMB 20 million; |
| •                              | Loan term: six   months starting from the date loan is actually provided to the Company. |
| •                              | Interest   rate: fixed rate of 5.58%; |
|                                | • | Penalty   interest rate for delayed repayment: 5.58% plus 50% *5.58%; |
|                                | • | Penalty   interest rate for embezzlement of loan proceeds: 5.58% * 2; |
| •                              | Purpose of   the loan is to provide working capital for the Company; |
| •                              | Advanced   repayment of loan needs to be approved by the Lender; |
| •                              | Breach of   contract penalties: suspension of loan not yet provided,   demand prepayment of loan principal and interest before maturity; imposition   of punitive interest; compensation for the Lender’s expenses incurred due to   the Company’s breach of contract such as lawyer’s fee, travel cost in case of   litigation, etc. |
| **Summary of the articles omitted** |
| •                              | Types of the   loan |
| •                              | Clearing of   the loan interest |
| •                              | Conditions   precedent to the drawing of the loan |
| •                              | Rights and   obligations of the Borrower |
| •                              | Rights and   obligations of the Lender |
| •                              | Guarantee of   the loan |
| •                              | Dispute   settlement |
| •                              | Miscellaneous |
| •                              | Validity |
| •                              | Notes |
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5737 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend the age of eligibility 

of dependent children for receipt of transferred educational assistance 

under the Post-9/11 Educational Assistance Program of the Department 

of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 14, 2010 

Ms. MOORE of Wisconsin introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend the age 

of eligibility of dependent children for receipt of transferred educational assistance under the Post-9/11 Educational Assistance Program of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Post-9/11 G.I. Bill De5 pendent Coverage Improvement Act’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5737 IH

1 SEC. 2. TRANSFER OF UNUSED EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE 

2 UNDER POST-9/11 EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE 

3 PROGRAM OF THE DEPARTMENT OF VET4 ERANS AFFAIRS TO DEPENDENT CHILDREN 

5 UNDER THE AGE OF 26. 

6 Section 3319 of title 38, United States Code, is 

7 amended by adding at the end the following new sub8 section: 

9 ‘‘(l) DEFINITION OF CHILD.—The definition of the 

10 term ‘child’ in paragraph (4) of section 101 of title 38, 

11 United States Code, shall be applied to this section by sub12 stituting ‘twenty-six’ for ‘twenty-three’ in subparagraph 

13 (A)(iii) of that paragraph.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-83,876-01

EX P ARTE ELT ON WADE RODG ERS, App licant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 11-00321 IN THE 235 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM COOK

E COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of indece ncy with a child by contac t and sentenc ed to five year s’ imprisonment. He did not appea l his conviction. Applicant contends, among other things, that his trial counsel rende red ineffe ctive assistance beca use he misadvised Applicant about t h e m eaning of his nolo contende re plea, leading him to believe there would still be an adver sarial test of the evidenc e. The habea s rec ord contains no rec ord of admonishments, no judicial confe ssion, no response fr om counsel, and no f indings of f

act. Applicant has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle him to relief

. Strickland v. W

ashington ,2

466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson , 993 S.W .2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these circ umstances, additional fac ts are neede d. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez , 334 S.W .2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropr iate forum for finding s of fac t. The trial court shall order trial coun s el t o respond to Applicant’s claim of i neff ective assistance of counsel. The trial court may

use any means set out in T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d)

. I f t he trial court elects t o hold a hear ing, it shall deter mine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wishes to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall ap p o i nt an attorney to repre sent Applicant at the hear ing. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. The trial court shall make finding s of fac t an d conclusions of law as to whether the perf ormanc e of Applicant’s trial counsel was defic ient and, if so , wh et her counsel’s defic ient perf ormanc e prejudice d Applicant. The trial court shall make specific finding s addre ssing how counsel advised Applicant as to the meaning of his plea, and whether Applicant’s plea was voluntary The trial court shall also make any other finding s of fac t and conclusi o n s o f law that it deems rele vant and a

ppropriate to the dispositi on of Applica nt’s claim for ha

beas c orpus re lief. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 day s of this order

. A sup p l em en t al t ranscript containing all aff idavits and int err og atories or the t ransc ription of t he court repor ter’s notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be for war ded to this Court within 120 day s of t he date of t his order. Any extensions of ti me shall be obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: Oc tober 7, 20153

Do not publish
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-60152 Summary Calendar

DONALD WAYNE WILLIS, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus STATE OF MISSISSIPPI; MIKE MOORE, Attorney General, State of Mississippi, Respondents-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 2:97-CV-292-P-G

-------------------- December 3, 1999 Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Donald Wayne Willis (Mississippi prisoner # 40317-A) was granted a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal thedistrict court’s dismissal of his habeas corpus petition as timebarred under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)’s statute of limitations. Both parties were ordered to brief the limitations issue; however, Willis has not done so. “Although [this court] liberally construe[s] the briefs of pro se appellants, [this court] also require[s] that argumentsNo. 98-60152 -2- must be briefed to be preserved.” Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993)(internal quotation and citation omitted). Willis has neither briefed nor identified any error in the dismissal of his petition as time-barred. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
AFFIRMED.
# C_2021421EN.01000201.xml

| 18.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 421/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 421/2

---

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/1894 as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/1657, and in Council Regulation (EU) 2019/1890, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1655

(2021/C 421/02)

The following information is brought to the attention of M. Mehmet Ferruh AKALIN (n. 1) and M. Ali Coscun NAMOGLU (n. 2), persons that appear in the Annex to Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/1894 (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/1657 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) 2019/1890 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1655 (4) concerning restrictive measures in view of Turkey’s unauthorised drilling activities in the Eastern Mediterranean.

The Council intends to maintain the restrictive measures against the above-mentioned persons and entities with new statements of reasons. Those persons are hereby informed that they may submit a request to the Council to obtain the intended statements of reasons for their designation, before 25 October 2021, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1.C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1.C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

---

(1)  OJ L 291, 12.11.2019, p. 47.

(2)  OJ L 372 I , 9.11.2020, p. 16.

(3)  OJ L 291, 12.11.2019, p. 3.

(4)  OJ L 372 I , 9.11.2020, p. 1.

---
# How Do I  Guides for Permanent Residents

#### Archived Content

The information on this page is out of date. However, some of the content may still be useful, so we have archived the page.

The items below explain how permanent residents can accomplish specific tasks through USCIS.
                - How Do I Help My Relative Become a U.S. Permanent Resident? (PDF, 577.38 KB)
                - How Do I Renew or Replace My Permanent Resident Card? (PDF, 550.19 KB)
                - How Do I Apply for U.S. Citizenship? (PDF, 2.21 MB)
                - How Do I Know What My Responsibilities Are? (PDF, 561.68 KB)
                - How Do I Get a Reentry Permit? (PDF, 667.32 KB)

03/14/2018

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.