alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

I, Walter Thomas Price III, certify that (i) the Annual Report of Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,
2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



/s/ Walter Thomas Price IIIWalter Thomas Price IIIManaging Member (Chief Executive Officer)Beeland Management Company, L.L.C.General Partner, Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P.March 30, 2011
# C_2021311EN.01000301.xml

| 3.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10299 — DBS/JPMC/Temasek/Techco JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 311/03)

On 29 July 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10299. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10299. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

192 

CA 14-01391 

PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

MICHELLE CASHION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, 

 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ALEXANDER T. BAJOREK AND JUDITH BAJOREK, 

DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

 

SCHNITTER CICCARELLI MILLS PLLC, EAST AMHERST (BRITTANY A. NASRADINAJ

OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. 

NICHOLAS, PEROT, SMITH, BERNHARDT & ZOSH, P.C., AKRON (MICHAELANGELO

J. CIERI OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County

(Catherine R. Nugent Panepinto, J.), entered October 29, 2013 in a

personal injury action. The order denied the motion of defendants for

summary judgment dismissing the complaint. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages for

injuries she allegedly sustained when she slipped and fell from

outdoor steps at the home she rented from defendants. Supreme Court

denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the

complaint. We affirm.

Contrary to defendants’ contentions, we conclude that there are

several triable issues of fact precluding summary judgment. First,

there is an issue of fact whether they maintained the premises at

issue in a reasonably safe condition (see generally Zuckerman v City

of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). We note that the allegedly open and

obvious condition of the steps does not absolve defendants of their

duty to keep the stairs in a safe condition but, instead, bears only

on plaintiff’s comparative fault (see Landahl v City of Buffalo, 103

AD3d 1129, 1131; Verel v Ferguson Elec. Constr. Co., Inc., 41 AD3d

1154, 1156). Second, there is an issue of fact whether any breach of

that duty “was a substantial cause of the events which produced the

injury” (Derdiarian v Felix Contr. Corp., 51 NY2d 308, 314-315, rearg

denied 52 NY2d 784; see Hahn v Tops Mkts., LLC, 94 AD3d 1546, 1548;

Prystajko v Western N.Y. Pub. Broadcasting Assn., 57 AD3d 1401, 1403).

Finally, there are issues of fact whether defendants created the

allegedly dangerous condition (cf. Navetta v Onondaga Galleries LLC,

106 AD3d 1468, 1469; see generally Ohanessian v Chase Manhattan Realty
-2- 192 

CA 14-01391 

Leasing Corp., 193 AD2d 567, 567), and whether defendants had

constructive notice of that condition (see generally Zuckerman, 49

NY2d at 562; Wilson v 100 Carlson Park, LLC, 113 AD3d 1118, 1119).

Entered: March 20, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-50289 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JEVON LEANDER BELL, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. MO-96-CR-105-1

- - - - - - - - - - January 19, 1998 Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jevon Leander Bell appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence. Bell was subject to a weapons pat-down after police officers stopped the vehicle in which he was a passenger because one of its occupants was not wearing a seat belt. During the pat-down, the officers located a package containing crack cocaine. Bell argues that the pat-down was not justified because he presented no danger to the officers.No. 97-50289 -2- The officers articulated specific facts supporting their belief that Bell was armed and dangerous. See Terry v. Ohio , 392

U.S. 1, 22-24, 27 (1968); United States v. Baker , 47 F.3d 691, 693 (5th Cir. 1995). Bell appeared nervous and was observed making furtive movements in the vehicle as if trying to hide something. See United States v. Colin , 928 F.2d 676, 678 (5th Cir. 1991); United States v. Garza , 921 F.2d 59, 59-60 (5th Cir. 1991). Additionally, the officers recognized Bell through previous investigations as an individual involved in drug trafficking, drive-by shootings, and gang activity. See , Garza , 921 F.2d at 59-60. During the pat-down, the officers discovered a package hidden in Bell’s trousers. Upon feeling the size and shape of the package, it was immediately apparent to the officers that it contained crack cocaine; thus probable cause to believe that Bellpossessed contraband arose during the course of the weapons patdown. See Minnesota v. Dickerson , 508 U.S. 366, 375-76 (1993); United States v. Cooper , 43 F.3d 140, 148 (5th Cir. 1995). The continued search of Bell’s person was valid as a search pursuant
to arrest. United States v. Ho , 94 F.3d 932, 935 (5th Cir. 1996). The district court did not err in denying Bell’s motion to
suppress. AFFIRMED.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Honorable John C, Narburger 

County Attorney 

Fayette County 

La Orange, Texas 

Dear Sir: 

-.. 

‘I._ 

opinion No. o-6172 ---,.. ~~ ~‘-,x. 

Rer Should the Asssssor~a fees 

for assessing taxes tar the 

,gemral fund, jury fuW road 

~r'an&bridge~fund, be oharged 

” proportionately to these 

respeotlve funds, or should 

the general fund be required 

.H--- to\beals the entire aost for ~? 

,i”. 

asseesing taxes for these 

/.-- 

_r ‘., 

x., respective Aurds? 

* 

This departam& has ‘given careful aonslderatlon to 

your request of reoept date iry%hloh you have asked our ahsver 

to the capt%Dmd quesB+on‘r,4fl ’ ,; 

z., \ 1;’ 

/ I;d’egk&lau Ho. .C-24&, this department held that 

in aouht3.b on’thWfee bas?S the fees for assessing taxes for 

various fuods ahoul&he borne by these reapeotlve funds, and 

that the entire o&@ should not come from the general fund. 

Ye are &olcMng a.,oogk of this opFnlon vhioh lista the authorities and’.~giv’b@ &lie peason upon vhich this oonoluslon was based. 

. 

P&ttt~ County, hovever, has a population of over 

20,000 and the county officers are being paid on a salary baais. 

This raises the quaere of whether or not the same aonaluslon 

reached Fn our Opinion No. O-2499 applies to aountiea that are 

on salary basis. Ue think it does. 
Xonomblo John C. Xarbmyqar, Pagm 2 

Arti 39l20, Se&ion 1, uh&b imovidea that 

0mtf 0m0ar, if3 a0mi88 Of a papulotirur -37 20,000 -11 

bo oalpella8tea by aalarlaa, ra8ds La parts 

* . proviaad, however, tht the aaabaaor and 00iAt0r of taxes rhrll aontuaw to ooilaot 

m r6tu for, th0 b8320rtt of the 0mfm-e shia~ 

Fundor~hRrei~ttarpawlaod?Qr.ollinaana 

0aEni881ena vhlob ha la uuthar18~ war law to colq o t l . .m 

Seetlaa 5 of Arti 39328, sups, read8 'a partz 

%!eo. 5. It aball ba the duty of all ofHorn to chargo and colloot in th8 4MaMr authoriaea 

by l8v all tua sml omlaalana vhlch are paxsltted by 

lav to k aa8aand and oolloatad for a11 offlola servlca parfolmad by tbam. As a&i vhen such faea 0r8 colleoted thy shall k cbpuaitad in the offtaars* Salery 

Fund, or ituala providau3 '%n thrs hat. . . 

Wo fae1t&attheabom quotatwnsdammtrata 

that methoQ or ooll~otlng and beau-InI? of tin equlm* of co.5 

P~8~~888ingt6xe. am the riolervhothm in sountiea antha fm 

baais or In oountlu 00 the MlrnPy b8ata. rlotually, the only 

dirtorenu betvtlan the tvo lm3aa ia that in tha fonser, tha oftlolal keep# the money n0elWd uatll a nquind mt lo 

ruahedand twna ?Jmbalanoa tot&e aountr, and inthe latkr, 

th o mo a ey la p lmed Ia 6 l peoialftmd, fsawhioh Wm aalariea 

ara paid. 

XOK:fo 

.;obert 3. Koch 

.baistant 

f----y
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Richard LaBarbera, President and Chief Executive
Officer of Kintera, Inc. (the Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 26, 2008



|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Richard LaBarbera                                                                
|Richard LaBarbera President and Chief
Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5717 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2010 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and 

Administration 

AN ACT 

To authorize the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution to plan, design, and construct a facility and to 

enter into agreements relating to education programs 

at the National Zoological Park facility in Front Royal, 

Virginia, and for other purposes. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5717 RFS

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Smithsonian Conserva5 tion Biology Institute Enhancement Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FACILITY FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PRO7 GRAMS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Board of Regents of the 

9 Smithsonian Institution is authorized to plan, design, and 

10 construct a facility on National Zoological Park property 

11 in Front Royal, Virginia for the purpose of conducting re12 search and educational programs. 

13 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 

14 authorized to be appropriated to carry out subsection 

15 (a)— 

16 (1) $1,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2010 

17 and 2011; and 

18 (2) $3,000,000 in the aggregate for all suc19 ceeding fiscal years. 

20 SEC. 3. AGREEMENTS FOR HOUSING AND OTHER SERVICES. 

21 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Board of Regents of the 

22 Smithsonian Institution is authorized to enter into agree23 ments for the provision of housing and other services to 

24 the participants in the programs referenced in section 2. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 5717 RFS

1 (b) COSTS.—The housing and other services de2 scribed in subsection (a) shall be provided at no cost to 

3 the Smithsonian Institution. 

4 SEC. 4. ANIMAL HOLDING FACILITY. 

5 The Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution 

6 is authorized to plan, design, and construct animal holding 

7 and related program facilities on National Zoological Park 

8 property in Front Royal, Virginia, to be funded from non9 federal sources. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 28, 

2010. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
# Special Rules for E-Verify Users

Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification, is the core of E-Verify. E-Verify is an internet-based system that compares information from Form I-9 to government records to confirm that an employee is authorized to work in the U.S. 

Although E-Verify uses information from Form I-9, there are some important differences between Form I-9 and E-Verify requirements. 

*If an individual has not yet been issued a Social Security number, the employer may contact E-Verify for further guidance. 

E-Verify is fast, free and easy to use. Employers can learn more about E-Verify at www.E-Verify.gov or by calling 888-464-4218 or 877-875-6028 (TTY).

Employees with questions about E-Verify may call 888-897-7781.

07/28/2023

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
#### SICKLES v. CANARY et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July, 1896.)

Action by Charles R. Sickles against Thomas Canary and others.

No opinion. Motion denied. See 40 N. Y. Supp. 948.
EXHIBIT
32.2





Certification
of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








I, James
M. Sullivan, Chief Financial Officer of Solutia Inc. (the “Company”), certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that to the best of my knowledge:








(1)
            the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
      ended June 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








Dated:
July 30, 2008


/s/ James M.
Sullivan


James M. Sullivan


Chief Financial Officer

















A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Solutia Inc. and will be retained by
Solutia Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
exv10w1xby






June 9, 2009




Exhibit 10.1(b)




Warrington Management, L.P.

12377 Merit Drive — Suite 800

Dallas, Texas 75251-2296




Attention: Mr. Scott C. Kimple




     Re: Management Agreement Renewals



Dear Mr. Kimple:




We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which
reference is made below (the “Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management
Agreements through June 30, 2010 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain
unchanged.





	 	•	 	Smith Barney Warrington Fund L.P.





Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it
to the attention of Ms. Jennifer Magro at the address above or fax to 212-793-1986. If you have any
questions I can be reached at 212-559-5046.




Very truly yours,




CITIGROUP MANAGED FUTURES LLC




	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Jennifer Magro
 

Jennifer Magro
	 	 
	 

	 	Chief Financial Officer & Director	 	 






WARRINGTON MGT., LP




	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Scott Kimple
 

	 	 






	 	 	 	 	 
	Print Name:

	 	Scott Kimple
 

	 	 






JM/sr




23
exv10w8wb







Exhibit
10.8(b)


June 9,
2009
 

Eckhardt Trading Company

1314 North Dearborn Parkway

The Carriage House

Chicago, Illinois 60610




Attention: Ms. Audrey L. Gale




     Re:       Management Agreement Renewal



Dear Ms. Gale:




We are writing with respect to your management agreement concerning the commodity pool to which
reference is made below (the “Management Agreement”). We are extending the term of the Management
Agreement through June 30, 2010 and all other provisions of the Management Agreement will remain
unchanged.





	 	•	 	CMF Eckhardt Master Fund L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	Citigroup Diversified 2000 Futures Fund L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	SB Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	SB Diversified Futures Fund L.P. II





Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it
to the attention of Ms. Jennifer Magro at the address above or fax to 212-793-1986. If you have any
questions I can be reached at 212-559-5046.




Very truly yours,




CITIGROUP MANAGED FUTURES LLC




	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Jennifer Magro
 

Jennifer Magro
	 	 
	 

	 	Chief Financial Officer & Director	 	 






ECKHARDT TRADING COMPANY




	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ William Eckhardt
 

	 	 
	 	 	Print Name: William Eckhardt	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	JM/sr
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2589 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2589

    To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to require the Federal 
Communications Commission to publish on its Internet website changes to 
  the rules of the Commission not later than 24 hours after adoption.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 1, 2015

Mrs. Ellmers of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to require the Federal 
Communications Commission to publish on its Internet website changes to 
  the rules of the Commission not later than 24 hours after adoption.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TIMELY AVAILABILITY OF CHANGES TO RULES OF THE COMMISSION.

    (a) Amendment.--Section 4 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 
U.S.C. 154) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(p) Not later than 24 hours after adopting a provision that will 
appear in the Code of Federal Regulations, or an amendment to or repeal 
of a provision that appears in the Code of Federal Regulations, the 
Commission shall publish on the Internet website of the Commission the 
text of the provision adopted or repealed, or the text indicating how 
the provision is being amended, as the case may be.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
with respect to a provision, or an amendment to or repeal of a 
provision, that is adopted after the date that is 30 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


     We have issued our report dated March 15, 2005, accompanying the
financial statements included in the amended Annual Report of Trycera
Financial, Inc. on Form 10-KSB/A-1 for the year ended December 31, 2004.
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the
Registration Statement of Trycera Financial, Inc. on Form S-2 (File No.
333-121651).

/s/ Chisholm, Bierwolf & Nilson LLC

CHISHOLM, BIERWOLF & NILSON LLC

Bountiful, Utah
May 13, 2005
EXHIBIT
10.21


 


Compensatory Arrangements with Executive Officers


 


Base Salary


 


The current annual base salaries of each of
the executive officers of PLC Systems Inc. (the “Company”) are as follows:


 


	
  Mark R. Tauscher, President and Chief Executive
  Officer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  310,247

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  James G. Thomasch, Senior Vice President of
  Finance and Administration, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer  

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  194,776

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Kenneth J. Luppi, Vice President of Operations

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  164,625

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Vincent C. Puglisi, Managing Director, International  

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  161,537

  	
   

  



 


Other Compensation


 


Mr. Tauscher and Mr. Thomasch each
currently receive an annual car allowance of $12,000.  Mr. Luppi and Mr. Puglisi each
currently receive an annual car allowance of $6,000.


 


The Compensation Committee may also, from
time to time, award each of the executive officers compensation in the form of
stock options granted under the Company’s 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, as
amended.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 2.1



Securities and Exchange Commission,
450 Fifth Street, N.W.,
Washington D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen,

Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2000 filed by China Mobile (Hong Kong) Limited (the "Company") on
or about the date hereof ("Form 20-F"). For the purposes of satisfying the
requirements of Item 19 of the Form 20-F and with reference to Instruction
(2)(b)(i) to Item 19 thereof, the Company hereby agrees to furnish to the
Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission"), upon request by the
Commission, a copy of the instruments that define the rights of the holders of
the Renminbi five billion guaranteed bonds due in 2001 issued by our
wholly-owned subsidiary in China, Guangdong Mobile Communication Company
Limited, on June 18, 2001 (the "Bonds"). Such instruments include (A) Articles
Relating to the 2001 Offering of China Mobile Communications Corporate Bonds and
(B) Guarantee dated March 27, 2001 by China Mobile (Hong Kong) Limited for the
Bonds.



CHINA MOBILE (HONG KONG) LIMITED


By:    /s/ Wang Xiaochu
       -------------------------
Name:  Wang Xiaochu
Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Date:  June 26, 2001
#### PIERCE, Appellant, v. REDDISH, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fifth Department.

January 18, 1894.)

Action by Henry C. Pierce against J. A. Reddish.

No opinion. Judgment of the county court of Steuben county affirmed, with costs.