alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
  13.1

HOLMES FINANCING (NO. 3) PLC04154576

ABBEY NATIONAL
  HOUSE
  2 TRITON SQUARE, REGENTS PLACELONDON NW1 3AN

Certification
  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
  Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of
  the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter
  63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of the servicer
  does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form
  20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the Form 20-F) of Holmes
  Financing (No. 3) PLC (theCompany)
  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
  Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents,
  in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
  of the Company.

|Dated: |  | June 30,
      2005 |  | /s/ Chris Fielding
|------ |  | ------------------- |  | ------------------
|       |  |                     |  | Chris Fielding    

A signed original of this
  written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and
  will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
  Commission or its staff upon request.

---
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

In connection with the Annual Report of Garuda Capital Corp.,l
Services Group, Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending
June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, C.Robin Relph Chief Financial Officer certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)      The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|October 5, 2005         | 
|----------------------- | 
|                        | 
|                        | 
|/s/ C. Robin Relph      | 
|C. Robin Relph          | 
|Chief Financial Officer | 

---
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 7, 2024

NO. 03

- 22

- 00656

- CR

Gary Bean , Appellant

v.

The State of Texas , Appellee

APPEAL FROM 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY
BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND KELLY

AFF IRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment of conviction

. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of

conviction

. Because appellant is indigen t and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs

is made.
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court o **f Appeals**

**San Antonio, Texas**

November 20, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00532

- CR

Paul AGUILAR

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR5627 Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presi ding



### ORDER

Appellant ’ s brief was originally due September 22, 2014 , but was not filed. This court notified appellant = s counsel of the deficiency on September 29, 2014

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(b)(2). On October 9, 2014 , appellant responded by filing a motion for extension of time, requesting additional time to file the appellant ’ s brief. We granted appellant’s motion and ordered appellant to file his brief in this court on or before November 10, 2014. Neither the brie f

nor motion to extend time to file the brief has been filed.

Accordingly, w e ORDER Patrick Barry Montgomery to file the appellant ’ s brief in

this court on or before D ecember 22, 2014

. Counsel is advised that no further extensions of time will be granted absent written proof of extraordinary circumstances

— and counsel is

advised th at a heavy workload is not an extraordinary circumstance . If the brief is not filed on or before the date ordered, the court will abate this appeal and rem and the case to the trial court for a hearing to determine whether appellant or his counsel has abandoned the appeal.

We further order the clerk of this court to serve this order on counsel by first class United States mail and by certified mail, return receipt requested, with delivery restricted to addressee only, or give other personal notice of this order with proof of delivery. A copy of the order should also be served on the other parties and the trial court._________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 20th day of November, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNISON'S
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             812
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,007
<ALLOWANCES>                                       948
<INVENTORY>                                      1,256
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,315
<PP&E>                                           7,033
<DEPRECIATION>                                     759
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  89,515
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,730
<BONDS>                                         32,988
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,762
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    89,515
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               102,589
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   85,715
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,713
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   476
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,357
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    328
<INCOME-TAX>                                       214
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                114
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       114
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        

</TABLE>
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5906 

To prohibit the expenditure of funds for the construction or lease of buildings 

or space in the District of Columbia for the United States Government 

until January 1, 2012. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 28, 2010 

Mr. GOHMERT (for himself, Mr. PENCE, Mrs. LUMMIS, Mr. CONAWAY, Mr. 

COFFMAN of Colorado, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. POSEY, Mr. BARTLETT, and Mr. SHADEGG) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To prohibit the expenditure of funds for the construction 

or lease of buildings or space in the District of Columbia 

for the United States Government until January 1, 2012. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS. 

4 Congress finds the following: 

5 (1) The debt of the United States Government 

6 is over 12 trillion dollars and continues to rise. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5906 IH

1 (2) Congress must tighten its fiscal belt to ease 

2 the burden of the increasing debt level on United 

3 States taxpayers. 

4 (3) The Federal Government has a responsi5 bility to the taxpayers to make sacrifices in other 

6 areas. 

7 (4) Federal funds that otherwise would be spent 

8 on new construction or leasing of Federal buildings 

9 would be better spent helping the people of the 

10 United States by paying down the Nation’s debt. 

11 SEC. 2. MORATORIUM ON THE CONSTRUCTION OR LEASING 

12 OF NEW FEDERAL BUILDINGS IN THE DIS13 TRICT OF COLUMBIA UNTIL JANUARY 2012. 

14 (a) PROHIBITION.—No funds may be expended for 

15 the construction or lease of buildings or space in the Dis16 trict of Columbia for any branch of the United States Gov17 ernment or any entity within such branch unless a con18 tract for the construction or lease was entered into before 

19 the date of enactment of this Act. 

20 (b) EXCEPTION.—The prohibition in subsection (a) 

21 does not apply in any case in which the expenditure of 

22 funds for the purposes described in subsection (a) is nec23 essary in the interests of national security. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5906 IH

1 (c) EXPIRATION.—The prohibition under subsection 

2 (a) shall expire on January 1, 2012. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Wniteb $)tateg ([ourt of ~peaIg

for tbe jfeberaI ([ircuit

HARRY BURNETT,

Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,

Respondent.

2012-3102

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection

Board in case no. SF0432110400-I-1.

ON MOTION

ORDER

The Department of Justice moves without opposition

for a 13-day extension of time, until October 30, 2012, to

file its brief.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT Is ORDERED THAT:

Case: 12-3102 Document: 18 Page: 1 Filed: 10/23/2012
HARRYBURNETTv.DOJ

The motion is granted.

s27

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

2

Case: 12-3102 Document: 18 Page: 2 Filed: 10/23/2012
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5887 

To amend the Federal Hazardous Substances Act to require the inclusion 

of warning labels on Internet and catalogue advertising of certain toys 

and games. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 27, 2010 

Mrs. LOWEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Hazardous Substances Act to require 

the inclusion of warning labels on Internet and catalogue 

advertising of certain toys and games. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Choking Hazard 

5 Awareness Act’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5887 IH

1 SEC. 2. LABELING REQUIREMENT FOR INTERNET AND 

2 CATALOGUE ADVERTISING OF CERTAIN TOYS 

3 AND GAMES. 

4 Section 24 of the Federal Hazardous Substances Act 

5 (15 U.S.C. 1278) is amended— 

6 (1) by redesignating subsections (c) and (d) as 

7 subsections (d) and (e), respectively; 

8 (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the fol9 lowing: 

10 ‘‘(c) INTERNET, CATALOGUE, AND OTHER ADVER11 TISING.— 

12 ‘‘(1) REQUIREMENT.—Any advertisement for 

13 any toy, game, balloon, small ball, or marble that re14 quires a cautionary statement under subsections (a) 

15 and (b), including advertisement on Internet 

16 websites or in catalogues or other distributed mate17 rials, shall include the appropriate cautionary state18 ment required under such subsections in its entirety 

19 displayed on or immediately adjacent to such adver20 tisement. Such cautionary statement shall be dis21 played in the language that is primarily used in the 

22 advertisement, catalogue, or Internet website, and in 

23 conspicuous and legible type in contrast by typog24 raphy, layout, or color with other material printed or 

25 displayed in such advertisement, and in a manner 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5887 IH

1 consistent with part 1500 of title 16, Code of Fed2 eral Regulations (or a successor regulation thereto). 

3 ‘‘(2) ENFORCEMENT.—The requirement in 

4 paragraph (1) shall be treated as a consumer prod5 uct safety standard promulgated under section 7 of 

6 the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2056) 

7 and the publication or distribution of any advertise8 ment that is not in compliance with the require9 ments of paragraph (1) shall be treated as a prohib10 ited act under section 19 of such Act (15 U.S.C. 

11 2068).’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Coast GuardU.S. Department of Homeland Security

Search
Search

Search

-  Home    -  News Room             
  -  Reserve             
  -  Forcecom             
  -  Operations             
  -  Mission Support             
  -  Atlantic Area             
  -  Pacific Area             
  -  History 
-  Units    -  Organization             
  -  Coast Guard A to Z             
  -  Atlantic Area             
  -  Pacific Area             
  -  Force Readiness Command 
-  Leadership    -  Commandant’s Initiatives             
  -  Senior Leadership             
  -  Deputy Commandant for Operations             
  -  Deputy Commandant for Mission Support             
  -  Atlantic Area Commander             
  -  Pacific Area Commander             
  -  Reserve             
  -  Auxiliary 
-  Resources    -  CG Support             
  -  Legal      -  JoinCGJAG             
    -  Legal_Assistance        -  Find-A-Legal-Assistance-Lawyer             
      -  FAQ 
  -  Civil Rights             
  -  Work-Life             
  -  Administrative Law Judges      -  Virtual Hearing 
  -  Newsroom             
  -  Family             
  -  Library             
  -  CG Web Mail             
  -  Return 2 Service      -  FAQ 
-  Community    -  Art Program             
  -  Girl Scouts / Boy Scouts      -  Eagle Scout Recognition 
  -  Coast Guard Band             
  -  Coast Guard Cities             
  -  Honor Guard             
  -  JROTC      -  NEWS 
  -  Special Programs      -  Industry Academy        -  Contacts             
      -  2018 
  -  Trademark             
  -  Resources      -  History             
    -  CGC Eagle 
-  Mariners    -  National Vessel Documentation Center             
  -  National Maritime Center             
  -  National Pollution Funds Center      -  NRD        -  NRD_FAQs             
      -  Trustee_Links             
      -  NRD_DOCS             
      -  About_NRD_Funding 
  -  Boating Safety 
-  doing business		 
-  Join		 
-  Recruiting		 
-  contact		 
-  About		 

HomeResourcesAdministrative Law JudgesDecisionsDecisions Orders issued in 2021

**ALJ Decisions: 2021**

 

 

**

                      - FOIA
                      - Privacy Policy
                      - MHS Notice of Privacy Practices
                      - Accessibility
                      - No FEAR
                      - Whistleblower Protection
                      - U.S. Department of Homeland Security
                      - DHS Office of Inspector General
                      - WhiteHouse.gov
                      - USA.gov

### Stay Connected

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Donovan Crawford, Appellant.

[946 NYS2d 511]

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Greller, J.), rendered May 10, 2011, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the People failed to produce legally sufficient evidence of his guilt of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree in light of his defense of temporary innocent possession, and that the verdict of guilt was against the weight of the evidence. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence *(see*CPL 470.15 [5]; *People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342 [2007]), we nevertheless accord great deference to the factfinder’s opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor *(see People v Mateo,*2 NY3d 383, 410 [2004], *cert denied*542 US 946 [2004]; *People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Romero,*7 NY3d 633 [2006]). Contrary to the defendant’s contention, his conduct was not *965consistent with innocent possession *(see generally People v Williams,*50 NY2d 1043, 1045 [1980]; *People v Sooknanan,*92 AD3d 810, 810 [2012], *lv denied*18 NY3d 998 [2012]; *People v Hawkins,*258 AD2d 472, 472 [1999]). Rivera, J.P., Dickerson, Hall and Cohen, JJ., concur.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

June 2, 2021

No. 04

- 20

- 00589

- CV

IN RE Eloise and Ruben GUZMAN

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

On December 7, 2020, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus

. On February 17, 2021, we conditionally granted the petition. On March 2, 2021, real party in interest filed a “Motion for Emergency Stay and for Rehearing” asking this court to withdraw our order conditionally granting the petition for writ of mandamus, order the trial court to s tay its proceedings, and grant her motion for rehearing. On March 3, 2021, we granted real party in interest’s motion for stay and ordered the trial court proceedings to be stayed pending our disposition of the real party in interest’s motion for rehearin g . On April 1, 2021, we granted real party in interest’s motion for rehearing, withdrew our February 17, 2021 opinion and order, and requested a response to the petition. The real party in interest filed a response to which relators replied.

We conditi onally grant the petition for writ of mandamus and order the Honorable Bill Squires to, within fifteen days of this order, vacate his October 20, 2020 Order on Abatement. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(c). The writ will issue only in the event we are informed Judge Squires has failed to comply with this order.

The stay issued on March 3, 2021 is LIFTED.

It is so ORDERED on June 2, 2021

.

_____________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2020

- CV

- 0212, styled Ruben Guzman and Eloise Guzman v. Mary A.

Derrick and All Other Occupants , pending in the County Court, Guadalupe County, Texas, the Honorable Bill Squires

pre siding.04

- 20

- 00589

- CV

- 2

- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 2nd day of June, 2021

.

_____________________________ Michael A. Cruz , Clerk of Court
GreenPower Motor Company Inc.: Exhibit 10.27 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com


    

    PROMISSORY NOTE

    BORROWER: GreenPower Motor Company Inc., of Suite 240 - 209 Carrall Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6B 2J2

     (the "Borrower")

    LENDER: Koko Financial Services Ltd. of ***

     (the "Lender")

    AMOUNT: USD $100,000.00                                    

    DATE: June 29, 2020                                           

    FOR VALUE RECEIVED, on the Payment Date (as hereinafter defined) the Borrower promises to pay to the Lender, at *** or at such other address as the Lender may direct the Borrower in writing, the principal sum of ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND Dollars ($100,000.00) in lawful money of the United States (hereinafter the "Principal Sum"), together with interest on the unpaid balance of the principal sum at the Interest Rate (as hereinafter defined).

    For the purpose hereof, "Payment Date" means the earlier of (i) the date that the Borrower completes an equity financing of more than Five Million US Dollars (US$5,000,000) (ii) from receipt of proceeds on the sale of buses in excess of Ten Million US Dollars (US$10,000,000) or (iii) July 15th, 2021.

    For the purpose hereof, the "Interest Rate" means Twelve per cent (12%) per annum.  Interest at the Interest Rate will be calculated and paid on the last day of each month and after each of maturity, default and judgment.  If the Borrower fails to make any payment of interest when due, the Borrower will pay compound interest thereon computed on the last banking day of each month until such interest is paid.

    The Borrower shall have the right, without the consent of the Lender, to prepay in whole or in part, at any time and from time to time, all or any of the amounts due hereunder without bonus or penalty.

    The Borrower agrees to grant the Lender a general security assignment on the assets of the Borrower, which will be subordinated to the BMO Bank of Montreal.

    The Borrower hereby waives demand, notice of dishonor and presentment for payment, protest and notice of protest of this promissory note.

    SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED as of June 29th, 2020.

     

    GreenPower Motor Company Inc.

     

    By: /s/ Michael Sieffert

    Authorized Signatory
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Michael L. Hirschey state and attest that:

     (1) I am the Chief Executive Officer of OneSource Technologies, Inc. (the
"issuer").

     (2) Accompanying this certification is the Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2003, an annual report (the "periodic report") filed by the issuer
with the Securities Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), which contains
financial statements.

     (3) I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that based on my
knowledge:

          A. the periodic report containing the financial statements fully
     complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange
     Act, and

          B. the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents,
     in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
     of the issuer for the periods presented therein.

/s/ Michael L. Hirschey
-----------------------

Date: March 29, 2004

<PAGE>
# Email Protection

## You are unable to access this email address uscirf.gov

The website from which you got to this page is protected by Cloudflare. Email addresses on that page have been hidden in order to keep them from being accessed by malicious bots. **You must enable Javascript in your browser in order to decode the e-mail address**.

If you have a website and are interested in protecting it in a similar way, you can sign up for Cloudflare.

                  - How does Cloudflare protect email addresses on website from spammers?
                  - Can I sign up for Cloudflare?

Cloudflare Ray ID: **872bd7a259e1111d**•      Your IP:      Click to reveal68.60.74.180•Performance & security byCloudflare