alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. R. 2620 

One Hundred Fourteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the sixth day of January, two thousand and fifteen 

An Act 

To amend the United States Cotton Futures Act to exclude certain cotton futures 

contracts from coverage under such Act. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. EXCLUDING CERTAIN COTTON FUTURES CONTRACTS 

FROM COVERAGE UNDER UNITED STATES COTTON 

FUTURES ACT. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c)(1) of the United States Cotton 

Futures Act (7 U.S.C. 15B(c)(1)) is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘except that any cotton futures contract’’ 

and inserting the following: ‘‘except that— 

‘‘(A) any cotton futures contract’’; 

(2) in subparagraph (A) (as designated by paragraph (1)), 

by striking the period at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

(3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

‘‘(B) any cotton futures contract that permits tender 

of cotton grown outside of the United States is excluded 

from the coverage of this paragraph and section to the 

extent that the cotton grown outside of the United States 

is tendered for delivery under the cotton futures contract.’’. 

(b) APPLICATION.—The amendments made by subsection (a) 

shall apply with respect to cotton futures contracts entered into 

on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Garuda Capital Corp.
(the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended June 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Robin Relph, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

|1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
        Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
        and                               
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                     
|2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.



|By: | /s/
      Robin Relph       | 
|--- | --------------------------- | 
|    | Robin Relph,                | 
|    | Chief Executive Officer and | 
|    | Chief Financial Officer     | 
|    | November 10, 2005           | 

---
#### Robert Dorskind et al., Appellants, v Hagedorn Communications Corporation et al., Respondents.

— In an action to recover damages, *inter alia,*for fraud and breach of contract, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Becker, J.), entered May 13, 1985, *292which denied their motion for reargument of an order of the same court, entered September 19, 1984.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

No appeal lies from an order denying reargument. Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2394 

AN ACT 

To reauthorize the National Forest Foundation Act, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2394 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Forest Foun3 dation Reauthorization Act of 2015’’. 

4 SEC. 2. NATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION ACT REAUTHOR5 IZATION. 

6 (a) EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE MATCH7 ING FUNDS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE AND PROJECT EX8 PENSES.—Section 405(b) of the National Forest Founda9 tion Act (16 U.S.C. 583j–3(b)) is amended by striking 

10 ‘‘for a period of five years beginning October 1, 1992’’ 

11 and inserting ‘‘during fiscal years 2016 through 2018’’. 

12 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 

13 410(b) of the National Forest Foundation Act (16 U.S.C. 

14 583j–8(b)) is amended by striking ‘‘during the five-year 

15 period’’ and all that follows through ‘‘$1,000,000 annu16 ally’’ and inserting ‘‘there are authorized to be appro17 priated $3,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2016 through 

18 2018’’. 

19 (c) TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS.— 

20 (1) AGENT.—Section 404(b) of the National 

21 Forest Foundation Act (16 U.S.C. 583j–2(b)) is 

22 amended by striking ‘‘under this paragraph’’ and in23 serting ‘‘by subsection (a)(4)’’. 

24 (2) ANNUAL REPORT.—Section 407(b) of the 

25 National Forest Foundation Act (16 U.S.C. 583j– 
3 

•HR 2394 EH

1 5(b)) is amended by striking the comma after ‘‘The 

2 Foundation shall’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 9, 2015. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2394 

AN ACT 

To reauthorize the National Forest Foundation 

Act, and for other purposes.
#### ACROW CORPORATION OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee, and Mabey Bridge & Shore, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 2011-5035.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 25, 2011.

Thomas A. Coulter, Leclair Ryan, Richmond, VA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Lartease M. Tiffith, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Mabey Bridge & Shore, Inc. moves for a 43-day extension of time, until May 27, 2011, to file its brief. Acrow Corporation of America opposes. The United States moves for 60-day extension of time, until June 13, 2011, to file its brief. Acrow opposes.

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is Ordered That:

The motions are granted.
exv10w4wb






Exhibit
10.4(b)


June 9,
2009

Winton Capital Management

1a. St. Mary Abbot’s Place

Kensington, London W86LS,

U.K.




Attention: Mr. Martin Hunt




     Re: Management Agreement Renewals



Dear Mr. Hunt:




We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which
reference is made below (the “Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management
Agreements through June 30, 2010 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain
unchanged.





	 	•	 	Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	SSB Orion Futures Fund L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	CMF Winton Feeder LP I
	 
	 	•	 	CMF Winton Master Fund L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	Citigroup Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	CMF Institutional Futures Portfolio LP
	 
	 	•	 	Citigroup Abingdon Futures Fund L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	Citigroup Global Futures Fund Ltd.
	 
	 	•	 	Citigroup Orion  Futures Fund (Cayman) Ltd.





Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it
to the attention of Ms. Jennifer Magro at the address above or fax to 212-793-1986. If you have any
questions I can be reached at 212-559-5046.




	 	 	 	 	 
	Very truly yours,	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	CITIGROUP MANAGED FUTURES LLC	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Jennifer Magro	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Jennifer Magro	 	 
	 

	 	Chief Financial Officer & Director	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	WINTON CAPITAL MANAGEMENT	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Martin Hunt	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Print Name: Martin Hunt	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	JM/sr
#### Paul McDonald, Appellant, v Southhampton Hospital et al., Respondents.

In an action to recover damages based on medical malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gerard, J.), entered June 30, 1986, which granted the motion of the defendant Sherburn C. Brown and the cross motions of the defendants Southhampton Hospital, Hugh Halsey, II, and James P. Johnson for a change of venue of the action from New York County to Suffolk County. The appeal brings up for review so much of an order of the same court, entered September 26, 1986, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination.

Ordered that the appeal from the order entered June 30, 1986 is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order entered September 26, 1986, made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order entered September 26, 1986 is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,

Ordered that the defendants are awarded one bill of costs.

Absent a clear abuse of discretion, a determination to grant a change of venue pursuant to CPLR 510 (3) will not be *815disturbed on appeal *(see, Resnick v Karmax Camp Corp.,*112 AD2d 206). In a transitory action such as this, all other things being equal, the action should be tried in the county where the cause of action arose *(see, Thomas v Small,*121 AD2d 622), and, under all of the circumstances, the court did not abuse its discretion in finding that the interests of justice would be promoted by changing the venue of the action to Suffolk County. Mangano, J. P., Brown, Weinstein and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Lawrence, J., concurs on constraint of *Thomas v Small*(121 AD2d 622).
#### Joseph Davis, Inc., Respondent, v Mollenberg-Betz Machine Co., Inc., et al., Appellants.

Memorandum: In annulling the award of a public contract to respondent Mollenberg, the court erred in finding that Mollenberg’s bid failed to comply with the bid requirements and in concluding that Mollenberg thereby received a substantial and material advantage over other bidders. The bid instructions do not require a bid on both the base and alternative proposals and do not require submission of an alternative bid as a condition for the school district’s consideration and acceptance of a base bid. On the contrary, the bid instructions clearly reserve to the school district the right to consider the base bid and alternative bid separately. In view of this, there is no possibility that Mollenberg received a material advantage by failing to submit an alternative bid. It is clear that the school district would have been within its rights in accepting Mollenberg’s low bid on the base proposal whether Mollenberg submitted a higher or lower bid than petitioner on the alternative proposal. (Appeals from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Ostrowski, J. — art 78.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Denman, Boomer, Pine and Balio, JJ.
EXHIBIT 13.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                       of
                            Periodic Financial Report
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
                                  Section 1350

I, Cameron Richardson, Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer
of Aurora Metals (BVI) Limited, hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form
20-F for the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Aurora Metals (BVI) Limited


June 27, 2005.                By: (s)Cameron Richardson
                              -------------------------
                              Cameron Richardson Chief Financial Officer and
                              Director.


This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard set forth therein, and not for any other
purpose. It is not being filed as part of the Annual Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 75 (Tuesday, April 18, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 20810]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9592]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER00-2082-000]


Wisconsin Electric Power Company; Notice of Filing

April 10, 2000.
    Take notice that on April 3, 2000, Wisconsin Electric Power Company 
(Wisconsin Electric) tendered for filing a short-term firm Transmission 
Service Agreement and a non-firm Transmission Service Agreement between 
itself and The Detroit Edison Company (DTE). The Transmission Service 
Agreements allow DTE to receive transmission services under Wisconsin 
Energy Corporation Operating Companies' FERC Electric Tariff, Volume 
No. 1.
    Copies of the filing have been served on DTE, the Public Service 
Commission of Wisconsin and the Michigan Public Service Commission.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions 
and protests should be filed on or before April 24, 2000. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-9592 Filed 4-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# CI2021076EN.01002801.xml

| 5.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 76/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 76/28

---

COVID-19 outbreak

(Regulation (EU) 2021/267 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2021 laying down specific and temporary measures in view of the persistence of the COVID-19 crisis concerning the renewal or extension of certain certificates, licences and authorisations, the postponement of certain periodic checks and periodic training in certain areas of transport legislation and the extension of certain periods referred to in Regulation (EU) 2020/698 (1))

(2021/C 76 I/17)

The Hellenic Republic

Date of the Information to the Commission: 2.3.2021

The Hellenic Republic has decided, in conformity with the relevant provisions of Regulation (EU) 2021/267 of the European Parliament and of the Council that it shall not apply the following provisions:

| — | Article 4(1) concerning the regular inspections of tachographs in road transport under Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 (2); |
| --- | --- |

—

Article 4(1) concerning the regular inspections of tachographs in road transport under Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 (2);

| — | Article 5(1) concerning the time limits for the periodic roadworthiness tests for motor vehicles and their trailers under Directive 2014/45/EU (3); |
| --- | --- |

—

Article 5(1) concerning the time limits for the periodic roadworthiness tests for motor vehicles and their trailers under Directive 2014/45/EU (3);

| — | Article 5(2) concerning the validity of roadworthiness certificates under Directive 2014/45/EU. |
| --- | --- |

—

Article 5(2) concerning the validity of roadworthiness certificates under Directive 2014/45/EU.

---

(1)  OJ L 60, 22.2.2021, p. 1.

(2)  Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 February 2014 on tachographs in road transport, repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85 on recording equipment in road transport and amending Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport (OJ L 60, 28.2.2014, p. 1).

(3)  Directive 2014/45/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 on periodic roadworthiness tests for motor vehicles and their trailers and repealing Directive 2009/40/EC (OJ L 127, 29.4.2014, p. 51).

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. EL00-67-000]

Take notice that on April 10, 2000, Strategic Power Management, Inc. (SPM) filed against the New York Independent System Operator, a Complaint Requesting Fast Track Processing and Motion to Consolidate.

A copy of this filing was serviced upon all persons parties reasonably believed to have an interest herein or be affected thereby in accordance with 18 CFR 385.206(c).

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions or protests must be filed on or before April 21, 2000. Protests will be considered by the                           ( print page 20441)                        Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222) for assistance. Answers to the complaint shall also be due on or before April 21, 2000.                

Linwood A. Watson, Jr., 

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-9473  Filed 4-14-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**Exhibit      10.43**

**Shenzhen      Development Bank**

**Loan      Certificate**

| Applicant                             |   | Shenzhen                BAK Battery Co., Ltd        |
|---------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                                  |   |                                                |   |   |   |   |
| Currency                              |   | RMB                                                 |   | Amount |   | 150,000,000 |
|                                  |   |                                                |   |   |   |   |
| Loan                Term              |   | From                July 2, 2007 to January 2, 2008 |
|                                  |   |                                                |
| Usage                                 |   | Working                Capital                      |
|                                  |   |                                                |
| Annual                rate            |   | 5.85                %                               |
|                                  |   |                                                |   |   |   |   |
| Signature                of Applicant |   | Stamp                of Applicant                   |   | Signature                of Shenzhen Development Bank |   | Stamp                of Shenzhen Development Bank |
|                                  |   |                                                |   |   |   |   |
|                                  |   |                                                |   |   |   |   |
| /s/                Xiangqian Li       |   |                                                |   | /s/                Teshang Chen |   |   |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                   
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                          13,964
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,532
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        343
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,488
<PP&E>                                          55,932
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,347
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  61,073
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,479
<BONDS>                                            766
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,513
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,789
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    61,073
<SALES>                                         26,204
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,204
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,325
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  83
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,129
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,759
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,287
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .36
        

</TABLE>