alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

















<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 32.2



                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  accompanying  Annual  Report on Form 10-K of  Infinity
Capital  Group,  Inc.  for the year ended  December  31,  2009,  I,  Theodore A.
Greenberg,  Chief Financial  Officer,  Chief Investment  Officer,  Secretary and
Principal  Accounting  Officer of Infinity Capital Group,  Inc.,  hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

         a.       such  Annual  Report on Form 10-K of Infinity  Capital  Group,
                  Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009, fully complies with
                  the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                  Exchange Act of 1934; and

         b.       the  information  contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K
                  of Infinity  Capital  Group,  Inc. for the year ended December
                  31,  2009,  fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the
                  financial  condition  and  results of  operations  of Infinity
                  Capital Group, Inc.


Date: March 31, 2010

                              /s/ Theodore A. Greenberg
                              -----------------------------------------------
                              Theodore A. Greenberg, Chief Financial Officer,
                              Chief Investment Officer, Secretary and Director
                              (Principal Accounting Officer)



This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

NO. 97-1244

LORENZO J. ARMENTROS, APPELLANT,

 V.

ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI,

SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE.

Before IVERS, STEINBERG, and GREENE, Judges.

O R D E R

On October 3, 2000, the Court, sua sponte, stayed these proceedings pending a decision by

the Court in the matter of Hayre v. Gober, U.S. Vet. App. No. 95-854 (supplemental briefing ordered

April 14, 2000). Subsequently, the Court has issued decisions that suggest that the Veterans Claims

Assistance Act of 2000, Pub. L. No. 106-475, 114 Stat. 2096 (Nov. 9, 2000) (VCAA), which was

enacted after the Court's October 3, 2000, stay, has application to many claims pending before the

Court and has remanded many claims to the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) for consideration

of that question in the first instance. See, e.g., Weaver v. Principi, __ Vet.App. ___, ___, No. 00-

2284, 2001 WL 253651, at *1 (Mar. 15, 2001) (per curiam order) (vacating BVA denial of waiver

of debt for BVA to consider, "in light of the VCAA, [whether appellant was] entitled to additional

notification or assistance from VA prior to the adjudication of her claim"); Sachs v. Principi, __

Vet.App. ___, ___, No. 98-1632, 2001 WL 228173, at *1 (Mar. 9, 2001) (per curiam order)

(indicating, as to claim for VA service connection for cause of veteran's death, that VCAA "affect[s]

sections of chapter 51 of title 38 of the United States Code that set forth the Secretary's duty to

assist"); Holliday v. Principi, __ Vet.App. ___, ___, No. 99-1788, 2001 WL 179824, at *6 (Feb. 22,

2001) ("all provisions of the VCAA are potentially applicable to claims pending on the date of the

VCAA's enactment"); Luyster v. Gober, 14 Vet.App. 186 (2000) (per curiam order) (holding that

VCAA is applicable to claims denied as not well grounded).

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that, not later than 30 days after the date of this order, the Secretary file with the

Court and serve on the appellant a response to this order that shows cause why this case should not

be remanded for readjudication in light of the VCAA. It is further

ORDERED that, not later than 20 days after service of the Secretary's response, the appellant

may file a reply to the Secretary's response. If the Secretary's response contains a motion for remand

and the appellant does not file a reply thereto, the Court will consider the appellant to have consented

to the motion for remand. Cf. In Re: Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000 (VCAA), __ Vet.App.
2

__, Misc. No. 4-00, 2000 WL 1693303 (Nov. 13, 2000) (en banc order, temporarily found at

14 Vet.App. at Ct. R-2 (Dec. 2000)) (providing that failure of one party to file timely response to

other party's recommendation, made as part of the filing pursuant to that miscellaneous order, for

action under VCAA "may be considered that party's consent to any action recommended in that

motion").

DATED: April 2, 2001 PER CURIAM.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MRS. FIELDS
ORIGINAL COOKIES INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT OCTOBER 3, 1998 AND
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THIRTY NINE WEEKS ENDED OCTOBER 3,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-03-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1.00
<CASH>                                           5,146
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,512
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,019
<INVENTORY>                                      4,790
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,525
<PP&E>                                          51,367
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,364
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 222,657
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,801
<BONDS>                                        139,465
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,171
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,131
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   222,657
<SALES>                                         89,938
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                95,959
<CGS>                                           21,588
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   96,273
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   256
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,981
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,021)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        68
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,089)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,690)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pyramid Breweries Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Eric G. Peterson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/   ERIC G. PETERSON

Eric G. Peterson
Chief Financial Officer
November 8, 2002
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2606 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2606

   To amend title 23, United States Code, to discontinue funding for 
                  landscaping and scenic enhancement.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 2, 2015

  Mrs. Hartzler (for herself, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mr. Issa, Mr. 
 Hensarling, and Mr. Rokita) introduced the following bill; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 23, United States Code, to discontinue funding for 
                  landscaping and scenic enhancement.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Roads Not Roses Act''.

SEC. 2. LANDSCAPING AND SCENIC ENHANCEMENT FUNDING DISCONTINUED.

    (a) Repeal.--Section 319 of title 23, United States Code, is 
repealed.
    (b) Effective Date.--Section 319 of title 23, United States Code, 
as in effect the day before the date of enactment of this Act, shall 
apply to landscape and roadside development as part of a construction 
project of Federal-aid highways if funds were obligated for the project 
before such date of enactment.
                                 <all>
```
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5914 

To repeal the requirements under the United States Housing Act of 1937 

for residents of public housing to engage in community service and 

to complete economic self-sufficiency programs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 28, 2010 

Mr. RANGEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To repeal the requirements under the United States Housing 

Act of 1937 for residents of public housing to engage 

in community service and to complete economic selfsufficiency programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Public Housing Ten5 ants Respect Act of 2010’’. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5914 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF PUBLIC HOUSING COMMUNITY SERVICE 

2 AND FAMILY SELF-SUFFICIENCY REQUIRE3 MENTS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 12 of the United States 

5 Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437j) is amended by 

6 striking subsections (c) through (g). 

7 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—The United States 

8 Housing Act of 1937 is amended— 

9 (1) in section 5A(d)(12) (42 U.S.C. 1437c– 

10 1(d)(12))— 

11 (A) in subparagraph (A), by inserting 

12 ‘‘and’’ after the semicolon; 

13 (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking the 

14 semicolon and inserting a period; and 

15 (C) by striking subparagraph (C); 

16 (2) in section 6(l)(1) (42 U.S.C. 1437d(l)(1)), 

17 by striking ‘‘except for noncompliance’’ and all that 

18 follows through ‘‘based on such noncompliance’’; and 

19 (3) in section 9(e)(1)(H) (42 U.S.C. 

20 1437g(e)(1)(H)), by striking ‘‘a public housing work 

21 program under section 12’’ and inserting ‘‘any pro22 gram that provides work for residents of public 

23 housing’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5880 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5880

      To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide for 
 nonimmigrant visas for certain aliens whose petitions or applications 
         are pending or who have not received immigrant visas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2010

   Mr. Djou introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide for 
 nonimmigrant visas for certain aliens whose petitions or applications 
         are pending or who have not received immigrant visas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Family Reunification Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. REINSTATEMENT OF NONIMMIGRANT VISAS FOR CERTAIN SPOUSES OR 
              CHILDREN.

    Section 101(a)(15)(V) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(V)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``on or before the date of the enactment of 
        the Legal Immigration Family Equity Act,'' and inserting 
        ``December 21, 2010'';
            (2) in clause (i), by striking ``3 years'' and inserting 
        ``540 days''; and
            (3) in clause (ii), by striking ``3 years'' and inserting 
        ``540 days''.
                                 <all>
```
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5798 

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs telehealth clinic in Craig, 

Colorado, as the ‘‘Major William Edward Adams Department of Veterans 

Affairs Clinic’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 20, 2010 

Mr. SALAZAR (for himself, Mr. POLIS of Colorado, Mr. PERLMUTTER, Ms. 

DEGETTE, Ms. MARKEY of Colorado, Mr. LAMBORN, and Mr. COFFMAN

of Colorado) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs telehealth clinic 

in Craig, Colorado, as the ‘‘Major William Edward 

Adams Department of Veterans Affairs Clinic’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

4 TELEHEALTH CLINIC, CRAIG, COLORADO. 

5 The Department of Veterans Affairs telehealth clinic 

6 in Craig, Colorado, shall after the date of the enactment 

7 of this Act be known and designated as the ‘‘Major Wil8 liam Edward Adams Department of Veterans Affairs ClinWReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 5798 IH

1 ic’’. Any reference to such clinic in any law, regulation, 

2 map, document, record, or other paper of the United 

3 States shall be considered to be a reference to the ‘‘Major 

4 William Edward Adams Department of Veterans Affairs 

5 Clinic’’. 

Æ 

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.02**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K ofMathStar, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 16, 2007 (the “AnnualReport”), I, James W. Cruckshank, Vice President of Administration and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

1.      The AnnualReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

2.      The informationcontained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| March 13, 2007 |   |                                                           |
|----------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|           | By     | /s/ James W.  Cruckshank                                       |   |
|           |   | James W.  Cruckshank                                           |
|           |   | Vice President of  Administration and  Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 79 (Tuesday, April 24, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 20638]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10010]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Availability of Patent for Exclusive, Partially Exclusive, or 
Non-Exclusive License

AGENCY: U.S. Army Soldier and Biological Chemical Command, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Army announces the general availability 
of exclusive, partially exclusive, or nonexclusive licenses under the 
following patent that is listed in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION 
paragraph.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Robert Rosenkrans at U.S. Army 
Soldier and Biological Chemical Command, Kansas Street, Natick, MA 
01760, phone (508) 233-4928 or E-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#99cbf6fbfcebedb7cbf6eafcf7f2ebf8f7ead9f7f8edf0faf2b7f8ebf4e0b7f4f0f5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="287a474a4d5a5c067a475b4d46435a49465b6846495c414b4306495a455106454144">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Any licenses granted shall comply with 35 
U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR part 404. The following Patent, Title, and Issue 
date is provided:
    Patent Number: 09/165,043.
    Title: Enzyme-Catalyzed Modifications of Macromolecules in Organic 
Solvents.

    Issue Date: April 3, 2001.
Luz D. Ortiz,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-10010 Filed 4-23-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
** **

**Exhibit 31.1**

I, Douglas M. Pihl,certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this Form 10-K/A(Amendment No. 1) of MathStar, Inc.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, thisForm 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

4.    The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)     Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b)    [intentionally omitted];

c)     Evaluated the effectiveness ofthe registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

d)    Disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

5.    The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)     All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

b)    Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| October 26, 2006 |   |                                        |
|------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|             | By     | /s/ Douglas M.  Pihl                        |
|             |   |  Douglas M. Pihl                       |
|             |   |  President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----