alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Patricio Hernandez MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-5232.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 23, 2011.

Decided: April 19, 2011.

*209Milton B. Shoaf, Jr., Salisbury, North Carolina, for Appellant. Randall Stuart Galyon, Office of the United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Patricio Hernandez Martinez appeals the sixty-five-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to conspiracy to distribute 500 or more grams of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (2006). Martinez’s counsel filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), asserting that there are no meritorious grounds for appeal but questioning whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain Martinez’s conviction. Martinez filed a pro se supplemental brief.* Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

The sole issue raised in the *Anders*brief is whether the evidence was sufficient for the district court to accept Martinez’s guilty plea. Upon review, we conclude that by pleading guilty, Martinez waived his right to' contest the sufficiency of the evidence underlying his conviction. *See United States v. Willis,*992 F.2d 489, 490 (4th Cir.1993) (“[A] guilty plea constitutes a waiver of all nonjurisdictional defects, including the right to contest the factual merits of the charges.”) (internal citation and quotation marks omitted).

In accordance with *Anders,*we have reviewed the record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. We therefore affirm the district court’s judgment. This court requires that counsel inform Martinez, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If Martinez requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on Martinez. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conclusions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*

*

 In his pro se brief, Martinez asserts that the indictment was insufficient to confer jurisdiction, that the district court erred in imposing the sentence, and that the Government breached the plea agreement. We have carefully reviewed these claims and conclude that they lack merit.
# C_2021384EN.01000101.xml

| 22.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 384/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 384/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10381 — One Rock Capital/The Eastman Tire Additives business of Eastman Chemical Company)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 384/01)

On 1 September 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10381. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10381. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER00-1816-001]

                    Take notice that on April 12, 2000, DTE-River Route No. 1, L.L.C. tendered for filing a response to Staff's deficiency                           ( print page 21175)                        letter issued in this docket on April 7, 2000 and a revised FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume No. 1.                

Copies of the filing were served upon parties to the above-captioned proceeding and the Michigan Public Service Commission.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before April 24, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-9913  Filed 4-19-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Millennium Quest, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Dimitri Cocorinis and Terry Cononelos, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Date: April 5, 2007 /s/ Dimitri Cocorinis Dimitri Cocorinis, Chief Executive Officer   Date: April 5, 2007 /s/ Terry Cononelos Terry Cononelos, Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit32**

 

**CertificationPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act**

 

The certification setforth below is being submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission solelyfor the purpose of complying with Section 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 ofthe United States Code.

 

A. W. Bergeron, thePresident and Pam Strunk, the Chief Financial Officer of AES Red Oak, L.L.C.,each certifies that, to the best of his or her knowledge:

 

1.     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.     theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of AES Red Oak, L.L.C.

 
|   | /s/ A.W. Bergeron       |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Name: A.W. Bergeron     |
|   | President               |
|   |                    |
|   |                    |
|   | /s/ Pam Strunk          |   |
|   | Name: Pam Strunk        |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2630 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2630

 To amend the Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act of 2006 to extend the 
  moratorium on oil and gas leasing and related activities in certain 
                      areas of the Gulf of Mexico.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 3, 2015

 Mr. Jolly (for himself and Ms. Graham) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act of 2006 to extend the 
  moratorium on oil and gas leasing and related activities in certain 
                      areas of the Gulf of Mexico.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Preserving Florida's Coastal 
Communities Act''.

SEC. 2. MORATORIUM ON COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITY IN CERTAIN AREAS 
              OF GULF OF MEXICO.

    Section 104(a) of the Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act of 2006 
(43 U.S.C. 1331 note) is amended by striking ``June 30, 2022'' and 
inserting ``June 30, 2027''.
                                 <all>
```
# Finding a Medical Doctor

If you file Form I-485, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status, you typically must undergo an immigration medical examination and receive vaccinations against vaccine-preventable diseases. If you are required to undergo an immigration medical examination, see the myUSCIS Find a Civil Surgeon page for help finding a designated physician (known as a "civil surgeon"). You can also call the USCIS Contact Center at 800-375-5283. (For people who are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability: TTY 800-767-1833.)

This immigration medical examination takes place in the United States, where all designated civil surgeons are located. Noncitizens applying for an immigrant visa with the Department of State (DOS)(known as “consular processing”) must visit panel physicians located overseas who perform the immigration medical examination for those who are consular processing.

## Immigration Medical Examination Fees

We do not regulate the fees that civil surgeons charge to perform an immigration medical examination. You may want to call several local civil surgeons to compare fees and to inquire if the civil surgeon accepts insurance for the immigration medical examination.

**You should be aware that:**
                - Rates vary by civil surgeon;
                - Many civil surgeons do not accept insurance; and
                - Insurance may not cover many portions of an immigration medical examination.

For more information on how to obtain an estimate before your appointment, visit the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ Understanding costs in advance webpage.

## Completing Medical Forms

Print out and bring the most recent edition of Form I-693, Report of Medical Examination and Vaccination Record, to your immigration medical examination appointment. Complete Part 1 of Form I-693 but **do not sign** the form until the civil surgeon tells you to. The civil surgeon will use Form I-693 to document the results of your immigration medical examination. You should also bring your medical records, including vaccination records.

The civil surgeon will complete, sign, and seal Form I-693 and any supporting documents in an envelope. You must submit the sealed envelope to USCIS as explained in the Form I-693 instructions.

**IMPORTANT:** Do not break the seal or open this envelope. We will not accept Form I-693 if it is not in a sealed envelope or if the envelope is altered in any way.

## Civil Surgeons' Responsibilities and Requirements

For more information on the responsibilities, requirements and instructions on how civil surgeons perform immigration exams, see our Designated Civil Surgeons page

07/26/2023

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
#### Eugene R. Modjeski et al., Respondents, v Fred R. Harding, Jr., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

— In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants Fred R. Harding and Eileen Harding appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Coppola, J.), dated October 23, 1985, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment against them.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is denied.

The affidavits submitted on behalf of, and in opposition to, the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment present an issue of fact as to whether the appellants’ mortgage payment due on September 30, 1984 was made within the 30-day grace period provided by the bond and mortgage *(see, Title Guar. & Trust Co. v Queens Freeholds,*267 App Div 787; *Fourth Section Corp. v Carton Enters.,*29 Misc 2d 746). Mangano, J. P., Brown, Weinstein and Spatt, JJ., concur.
# Change of Country

You may request a change of country at any time. 

While Form I-600A, Application for Advance Processing of an Orphan Petition, Form I-600, Petition to Classify Orphan as an Immediate Relative, or Form I-800A, Application for Determination of Suitability to Adopt a Child from a Convention Country, is pending:
                    - You must notify the  USCIS National Benefits Center (NBC)  in writing to request a change of country.
                    - There is no fee for a change of country before the initial approval of Form I-600A, Form I-600, or Form I-800A. You can find the filing fee for Form I-600A, Form I-600, and Form I-800A by visiting our  Fee Schedule  page. 
                    - You must submit an  updated home study  specifying the new country or countries you are recommended to adopt from.

                    - There is no limit to the number of change of country requests that you may submit. 
                    - There is no fee for your first or second change of country request.
                    - For a Form I-600A case:                       - For your first or second change of country request, you must submit the request using Form I-600A/I-600, Supplement 3, Request for Action on Approved Form I-600A/I-600
                      - For any subsequent change of country request, you must submit Form I-600A/I-600, Supplement 3,  Form I-824, Application for Action on an Approved Application or Petition , with fee. You can find the filing fee for Form I-600A/I-600, Supplement 3 by visiting our  Fee Schedule  page. 
                      - You must  update your home study  for any change of country request (first or subsequent).
                    - For a Form I-800A case:                       - Request a change of country using  Form I-800A, Supplement 3 (PDF, 345.87 KB) .
                      - You must  update your home study .
                      - There is a filing fee for third and subsequent change of country requests. You can find the filing fee for Form I-800A, Supplement 3 by visiting our  Fee Schedule  page. 

If you filed Form I-600A and you now wish to pursue an adoption from a country that is party to the Hague Adoption Convention, you must file Form I-800A with fee. Likewise, if you filed Form I-800A and wish to pursue an adoption from a non-Hague country, you must file Form I-600A or Form I-600 concurrent (or combination) filing with fee

04/01/2024

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
#### Robert Quigley *against*Joel Middleton.

A writ of restitution issued after, although tested before the death of the defendant or person against whom it issues, will be quashed. And the application to quash may be made on behalf of a party interested.

*Wall*moved to set aside the writ of restitution issued in this ease upon the reversal by this court of a judgment of forcible entry and detainer, which had been brought here by *certiorari.*He read affidavits to prove that Joel Middleton,. the person against whom the writ issued, died on the 10th of September, 1828, and to prove that the sheriff did not receive the writ of restitution until the 8th of October last; the writ was tested on the first Tuesday of September, which was the 2d day of September. He also read a deed from Joel Middleton to Benjamin South, dated in August, 1828, for the premises mentioned in the writ of restitution ; and he stated that he made this motion in behalf of the purchaser B. South, and of the executors of Joel Middleton.

*Hamilton*and *Scott*resisted the motion, and contended :

1. That the writ was good because it was tested before the death of Middleton, although it issued after.

2. That if the writ of restitution was irregular, it ought to be set aside only upon the application of a person who had a right to make such application. That the only persons who had a right to make the application, were the heirs of Joel Middleton. That the executors had no right in the land, and that the purchaser having purchased *pendente lite*had no right to make the application.

Ch. Justice

delivered the opinion of the court, that the writ of restitution must be quashed, because it issued after the death of Middleton.

Writ quashed.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Phillip Michael Nunez , Appellant

No. 06

- 21

- 00101

- CR v.

The State of Texas , Appellee Appeal from the 196th District Court of Hunt County, Texas (Tr. Ct

. No. 32289CR ). Memorandum O pinion delivered by Justice

van Cleef
, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Stevens participating

.

As stated in the Court’s opi nion of this date, we find there was partial error in the judgment of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s ju dgment adjudicating guilt by changing the entry under “ Plea to Motion to Adjudicate ” to “ TRUE TO PARAGRAPH 6; NOT TRUE TO PARAGRAPHS 1, 5 , AND 7

. ” As modified, the judgment of the trial court is
affirmed. We note that the appellant, Phillip Michael Nunez , has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED SEPTEMBER 16,2022 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey , Clerk
# USCIS Revisa su Manual de Políticas para Alinearlo a la Nueva Regla de Tarifas

04/01/2024

Estamos revisando nuestras guías (PDF, 364.37 KB) del Manual de Políticas de USCIS para alinearlas a la Regla Final de Desglose de Tarifas y Cambios en Ciertos Otros Requisitos de Solicitudes de Beneficios de Inmigración publicada en el Registro Federal el 31 de enero de 2024 y efectiva el 1 de abril de 2024.

Las revisiones al manual de políticas aplican a todas las solicitudes y peticiones mataselladas en o después del 1 de abril.

Usaremos la fecha del matasellos de la solicitud o petición para determinar qué versión y qué tarifas son las correctas, pero usaremos la fecha de recibo para efectos de cualquier fecha límite reglamentaria o estatutaria.

Las guías revisadas abarcan las nuevas tarifas de los formularios, las exenciones de tarifas y las solicitudes de exención de pago de tarifas, limita la cantidad de beneficiarios para ciertos formularios basados en el empleo y un nuevo suplemento de formulario para los casos de adopciones internacionales.

Por favor, consulte la página Preguntas Frecuentes, que actualizamos recientemente, para obtener detalles adicionales sobre la regla de tarifas y el desglose de tarifas.

**Información Adicional**

Para más información sobre USCIS y sus programas, por favor, visite uscis.gov/es o síganos en X (anteriormente Twitter), Instagram, YouTube, Facebook y LinkedIn.

04/01/2024

0 / 2000Para proteger su privacidad, por favor no incluya ninguna información personal en sus comentarios. Revise nuestra Política de Privacidad.
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, David She, the Chief Financial Officer of AMERICAN LORAIN CORPORATION (the Company), DO HEREBY CERTIFY
that:

| | 1. | The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal
      year ended December 31, 2010 (the Report), fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
      the Company.                                                               

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this
statement this 9th day of May, 2012.

/s/ David SheDavid She 
  Chief Financial
Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to American Lorain Corporation and will be retained by
American Lorain Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to §18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

---