T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T M A RI A E. RO D A S, P et i t i on er , v . E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 71524 A ge nc yN o. A 073- 969- 455 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ar c h 29, 2012 ** B efo re: P R E G E R S O N , T H O M A S , an dP A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. M a r i aE . R oda s , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of G ua t e m a l a , pe t i t i ons f orr e vi e w of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng her app ea l fr om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s ( “ I J ” ) de c i s i on de ny i ng he rappl i c a t i on f ora s y l um a nd w i thh ol di ng of re m ov al . W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew 

# FI LED APR02 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2 09- 71524

d e n o v o q u e s tio n s o f

law , C er ez o v. Mukasey , 51 2 F . 3d 11 63 , 11 66 (9th C i r. 20 08 ), e xc e ptt o the e xt e nttha tde f e r e nc e i s ow e d t o the B I A ’ s de t e rm i na t i on of the g o v e rn in g s ta tu te s a n dr e g u la tio n s , S im e o n o vv . A s h c r o ft , 3 7 1 F .3 d5 3 2 , 5 3 5 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) . W e r e v ie w f o rs ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e th e a g e n c y ’s f a c tu a l f in d in g s . Sa ntos-L em us v. Mukasey , 542 F . 3d 738, 742 ( 9th C i r . 2008) . W e gr antthe pe t i t i on f orr e vi e w a nd r e m a nd. R oda s c l a i m s s he i s e l i gi bl e f ora s y l um a nd w i thhol di ng of r e m ova l ba s e d on m e m be r s hi p i n apa rt i c ul a rs oc i a l gr oup of w om e n i n G ua t e m a l aw ho ar e the vi c t i m s of

dom e s t i c vi ol e nc e . T he I Jr e j e c t e d R oda s ’ s oc i a l gr oup be f or e the A tt orne yG e ne r a l ’ s de c i s i on i n M a t te ro f R-A- , 24 I . & N . D e c . 629 ( B I A 2008) ( l i f t i ng s t a ya nd r e m andi ng pe t i t i one r ’ s c l a i m s ba s e d on dom e s t i c vi ol e nc e f or fu rth er p ro ceed i n g s), an dth e B IA d i dn o tad d ress M a t te ro f R-A- i n i t s dec i si on . In l i ghtof the A tt orne yG e ne r a l ’ s de c i s i on i n M a t te ro f R-A- , a nd i n l i ghtof

our i nt e rve ni ng de c i s i on i n P erdo m o v. H older , 611 F . 3d 662, 669 ( 9th C i r . 2010) (r em andi ng for the agency t o d et erm i ne “ w hether w om en i n G uat em al a c on st i tut e a pa rt i c ul a rs oc i a l gr oup, a nd, i f s o, w he the r[ pe t i t i one r ] ha s de m ons tr a t e d af e arof p ersecu t i o n ” o n acco u n to f h er m em b ersh i p i n a p ro t ect edg ro up ), w e g ran tR o d as’ p e titio n f o rr e v ie w a n dr e m a n df o rf u rth e rp r o c e e d in g s c o n s is te n t w ith th is d is p o s itio n . See IN

S v. V en tu ra , 53 7 U . S . 12 , 16 -18 (20 02 ) ( per c uri am ).3 09- 71524

P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W GR AN T E D; RE MAND E D.