alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Donald H. Hunter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K/A (the “report) of Harbor Global Company Ltd.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];

 

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 18, 2005
#### Glen P. WATKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Lanny JOHNSON, Superintendent, Franklin Parish School Board; School Board of Franklin Parish, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 11-30089

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 9, 2011.

Dianne Lorraine Hill, Esq., Hill Law Office, Monroe, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Jon Keith Guice, Linda Kay Ewbank, Esq., Hammonds & Sills, Monroe, LA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before WIENER, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Plaintiff-Appellant Glen P. Watkins, holder of a Louisiana teaching certifícate, was hired for two consecutive school years as a teacher at two different schools in Franklin Parish, Louisiana. His hiring for the second school year was to fill the position of a teacher who was on a one-year sabbatical leave and whose return eliminated that vacancy, making the position unavailable for Watkins or anyone else. Watkins applied for another position which was ultimately filled by an applicant who did not hold a state teacher’s certificate. Watkins sued Defendants-Appellees claiming a “discriminatory failure to re-hire” on the basis of race and sex. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees, concluding that Watkins had failed to establish a genuine issue of material fact whether the nondiscriminatory reasons proffered by Defendants-Appellees were pretextual.

Our *de novo*review of the record on appeal, including the Memorandum Ruling of the district court and the law and evidence cited therein and in the appellate briefs of the parties, leads us to the same conclusion as that reached by the district court, i.e., that Defendants-Appellees are entitled to a summary judgment dismissing Watkins’s action. The school actors who did not re-hire Watkins were the same ones who hired him in the first place, creating a strong inference that the nondiscriminatory reasons for doing so were not pretextual. We agree with the district court that any potential violation of state law in hiring a person without a state certificate over one who holds such a certificate does not translate into a pretext for sex or race discrimination under Title VII. Likewise, the substantial summary judgment evidence of Watkins’s deficiency in maintaining order and discipline in his classes during the two years of his employment as a teacher argues against pretext.

In sum, we are satisfied that, even if Watkins is credited with having made a prima facie case, he has failed to establish a genuine issue of material fact that the non-discriminatory reasons for his not being rehired are pretext. Accordingly, for essentially the same reasons laid out in detail by the district court in its Memoran*332dum Ruling, that court’s summary judgment dismissing this case is, in all respects.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Listen

# Florida Advisory Committee Releases Report on Voting Rights in Florida Following Recent Amendments to the Election Code

October 2, 2023

The Florida Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights released a report following a series of public meetings and a collection of public testimony regarding changes that have taken place to Florida’s election code since the 2020 general election. The report examines the impact and projected impact of these changes on voting rights in the state. The report considers the extent to which, in practice, these changes may result in a disparate impact on communities of color in the state.

Over the past two decades, Florida has repeatedly reformed its election code in ways that have both expanded and restricted voting opportunities in a range of ways. While limited data available for this study did not show an immediate decline in voter registration or turnout during the 2022 midterm elections, primary concerns explored in this report include new restrictions governing the use of ballot dropboxes, new rules governing third party voter registration groups and ballot collection groups, and potential intimidation of legally authorized voters resulting from prosecutions within the newly established Office of Election Crimes and Security.

Committee Chair Nadine Smith said, “Defending voting rights must remain an essential priority at every level of government. This report shines a light on places where changes can help ensure more Floridians can engage in the democratic process. We are grateful for all the individuals, organizations, and elected officials who provided testimony. The bipartisan committee took great care in reviewing and crafting a report that reflects multiple points of view into a roadmap for improving our systems. We hope it sparks conversation, deeper examination, and important changes.”

Press Release

Report

Florida

-  All News 
-  Commission News 
-  Advisory Committees News 
-  Correspondence 
-  Videos 
-  Archives
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         116,668
<SECURITIES>                                 1,227,228
<RECEIVABLES>                                  866,749
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,904)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          21,539
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,009)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,357,986
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           477
<OTHER-SE>                                     611,825
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,357,986
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               469,408
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               183,057
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,379
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             119,913
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                163,059
<INCOME-TAX>                                    66,154
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             96,850
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    96,850
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.07
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.5








CERTIFICATIONS





Each of the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, in his capacity as an officer of SPACEHAB, Incorporated (SPACEHAB), that, to the best of his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of SPACEHAB on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operation of SPACEHAB.





Date: November 13, 2002/s/ Michael E. KearneyMichael E. KearneyPresident and Chief Operating Officer
Exhibit
      31.2




CERTIFICATION




I,
      Chris
      R. Decker, certify that:




1.
      I have
      reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Security Intelligence
      Technologies, Inc.;




2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this report;




4.
      The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:




a)
      designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b)
      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this report based on such evaluation; and




c)
      disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
      the
      registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.
      The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
      registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
      directors:




a)
      all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and




b)
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting.




Dated:October
              5, 2007/s/ Chris R. DeckerChris
              R. Decker, Chief Financial
              Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR CHARTER MUNICIPAL MORTGAGE ACCEPTANCE COMPANY
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001043325
<NAME> CHARTER MUNICIPAL MORTGAGE ACCEPTANCE COMPANY

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      16,914,665
<SECURITIES>                               625,885,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,218,371
<ALLOWANCES>                                   138,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               265,049
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             673,168,933
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       91,434,548
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 314,734,385
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               673,168,933
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,050,969
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,566,305
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             914,275
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,570,389
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,570,389
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

EXHIBIT 8.1

                                  SUBSIDIARIES

                               PETSEC ENERGY LTD.

                               CONTROLLED ENTITIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                      % OF OWNER-
            CONTROLLED ENTITIES               PLACE OF INCORPORATION      SHIP
--------------------------------------------  ----------------------  -----------
<S>                                           <C>                     <C>
Petsec Investments Pty. Limited                     Australia             100
Petroleum Securities Pty. Limited                   Australia             100
Najedo Pty. Limited                                 Australia             100
Petroleum Securities Share Plan Pty. Limited        Australia             100
Petsec America Pty. Limited                         Australia             100
Petsec (U.S.A.) Inc.                                  U.S.A.              100
Petsec Petroleum Inc.                                 U.S.A.              100
Petsec Energy Inc.                                    U.S.A.              100
Osglen Pty. Limited                                 Australia            80.7
Laurel Bay Petroleum Limited                        Australia             100
Ginida Pty. Limited                                 Australia             100
Western Medical Products Pty. Limited               Australia             100
</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.2



GPC Biotech AG



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Enacted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



GPC Biotech AG (the Company) is filing with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, on the date hereof, its annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (the Report). Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as enacted pursuant to the requirements of
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Mirko Scherer, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that:



To the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: April 3, 2006





|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ MIRKO SCHERER      
|Mirko Scherer          
|Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Westpac Banking Corporation, Respondent, v Vincent J. Deschamps et al., Defendants, and Siedman & Seidman, Appellant.

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Greenfield, J.), entered on or about April 16, 1987, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Edward Greenfield, J. Respondent shall recover of appellant $75 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Milonas, Rosenberger and Ellerin, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONATINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 2000, AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE PERIOD THEN
ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         137,774
<SECURITIES>                                    75,752
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,194
<ALLOWANCES>                                       164
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               196,660
<PP&E>                                           8,798
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,767
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 229,403
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,395
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           249
<OTHER-SE>                                     210,241
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   229,403
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,614
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,444
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   939
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,289)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        95
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,384)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.15)


</TABLE>
#### Cothran *v.*Pike *et al.*

Appeal from Cherokee Circuit Court.

Tried before the Hon. J. A. Bilbro.

H. W. Carden and O. Daniel, for appellant.

Burnett & Cuija, for appellee.

Opinion by

Tyson, J.

This was a statutory action of detinue, brought by the appellant against the appellees for the recovery of a horse.

There were verdict and judgment for the defendants. The plaintiff appeals.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### SHINGLE SPRINGS BAND OF MIWOK INDIANS, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Cesar CABALLERO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-17329.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*697Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 28, 2011.

Ian Robert Barker, Paula Marie Yost, Esquire, SNR Denton U.S. LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Bradley Laird Clark, Brad Clark, Attorney at Law, Placerville, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: FARRIS, LEAVY and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Cesar Caballero appeals the district court’s grant of a request for preliminary injunctive relief against him. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.

Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in granting preliminary injunctive relief. *The Lands Council v. McNair,*537 F.3d 981, 986 (9th Cir.2008); *see Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council,*555 U.S. 7, 129 S.Ct. 365, 374, 172 L.Ed.2d 249 (2008) (listing factors for district court to consider); *Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press Intern., Inc.,*686 F.2d 750, 752-53 (9th Cir.1982) (explaining limited scope of review). We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order granting the preliminary injunction.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.