alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Federal Agency

Pollution Removal Funding Authorization

Recipient Agency

Address

Agency Locator Code (ALC)

Agency DUNS

Agency Tax ID

Treasury Account Symbol (TAS)

1. Purpose

This document authorizes reimbursement to the Recipient Agency from the Oil Spill Liability

Trust Fund or CERCLA funds for certain removal costs incurred in response to the following

pollution incident, , 

Federal Project Number/CERCLA Project Number, . 

This funding authorization is expressly contingent on the Recipient Agency’s compliance with

all requirements contained herein.

2. Approved Functions and Reimbursement Limit

Costs will be reimbursed only for actions that are directed or approved in advance by the FOSC.

Approval may be verbal or written. Assessment, restoration, rehabilitation or replacement of

natural resources damaged by the spill are not covered.

Maximum limit of authorization: $

3. Conditions

See attached page(s) for scope of work, special conditions, date of performance,

directions or approvals.

4. Period of Authorization

This authorization shall remain in effect until the completion date specified by the FOSC

(which normally corresponds to the date of final removal activities).

5. Reimbursement Procedure

Upon completion of removal activities, the Recipient Agency will submit a SF-1080/1081 to the

FOSC with detailed records of expenditures and activities for which reimbursement is sought. The

agency may elect to use its own records providing an equivalent amount of documentation which

has NPFC approval, or the agency may elect to use NPFC's Resource Cost Documentation

package. The agency must submit the final request for reimbursement, supported by the required

documentation, within 90 days following the completion date. If OMB Circular A-87 cost rates

apply, cost certifications must be included. If at the end of the 90 days from final removal activities,

there are any costs for which reimbursement has not been requested, written notice will be sent to

the agency and 30 days later any balance remaining in the account will be deobligated.

Page 1 of 2

Rev. 03/22
Federal Agency 

Pollution Removal Funding Authorization

Page 2 of 2

6. Accounting Data

Project: Organization: 

Expenditure Type: 253014 Task: 

Award Number: 

7. Points of Contact

Federal On-Scene Coordinator Telephone: 

FAX: 

E-mail:

Recipient Agency Representative Telephone: 

FAX: 

E-Mail:

NPFC Case Officer Telephone: 

FAX: 

E-Mail:

8. Authorizing Official

Federal On-Scene Coordinator

Signature: Date

Attachments: (1) Scope of Work 

Rev. 03/22
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE SUPRMEME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court NO. DA 21-0418

* * * * * * * * * * *

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: ) ORDER GRANTING

) UNOPPOSED MOTION

JENNIFER L. RUSSUM, ) FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

) TO FILE RESPONSE BRIEF

Petitioner/Appellant, ) 

)

and )

)

MATTHEW S. WENDT, )

)

Respondent/Appellee. )

)

Appellee, MATTHEW S. WENDT, has moved this Court for a 30-day extension, from 

January 21, 2022, up to and including February 21, 2022, in which to file his Response Brief in 

this matter. Appellant does not oppose the Motion.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Appellee shall have up to and including February 

21, 2022, to file his Response Brief in this matter.

ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED AND DATED BELOW.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

January 18 2022

01/18/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0418
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21008-21009]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9738]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Minerals Management Service


Environmental Assessment Prepared for Proposed Western Gulf Sale 
177 on the Gulf of Mexico Outer Continental Shelf (OCS)

AGENCY: Minerals Management Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of availability of the environmental assessment on 
proposed western Gulf of Mexico Lease Sale 177.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Minerals Management Service (MMS) has prepared an 
environmental assessment (EA) for the proposed annual Lease Sale 177 
for the Western Planning Area of the Gulf of Mexico Outer Continental 
Shelf.
    In this EA, MMS has reexamined the potential environmental effects 
of the proposed action and alternatives based on any new information 
regarding potential impacts and issues that were not available at the 
time the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for Lease Sales 
171, 174, 177, and 180 was prepared.
    In summary, no new significant impacts were identified for proposed 
Lease Sale 177 that were not already assessed in the FEIS for Lease 
Sales 171, 174, 177, and 180. As a result, MMS determined that a 
supplemental EIS is not required and prepared a Finding of No New 
Significant Impact.
    If you wish to comment, you may mail or hand-carry written comments 
to the Department of the Interior, Minerals Management Service, 
Regional Director (MS-5410), Minerals Management Service, Gulf of 
Mexico OCS Region, 1201 Elmwood Park Boulevard, New Orleans, Louisiana 
70123-2394. Our practice is to make comments, including names and home 
addresses of respondents, available for public review during regular 
business hours. Individual respondents may request that we withhold 
their home address from the rulemaking record, which we will honor to 
the extent allowable by law. There may be circumstances in which we 
would withhold from the rulemaking record a respondent's identity, as 
allowable by the law. If you wish us to withhold your name and/or 
address, you must state this prominently at the beginning of your 
comment. However, we will not consider anonymous comments. We will make 
all submissions from organizations or businesses, and from individuals 
identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations 
or businesses, available for public inspection in their entirety.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Public Information Unit, Information 
Services Section at number below. You may obtain single copies of the 
EA from the Minerals Management Service, Gulf of Mexico OCS Region, 
Attention: Public Information Office (MS 5034), 1201 Elmwood Park 
Boulevard, Room 114, New Orleans, LA 70123-2394 or by calling 1-800-
200-GULF.


[[Page 21009]]


    Dated: April 13, 2000.
Chris C. Oynes,
Regional Director, Gulf of Mexico OCS Region.
[FR Doc. 00-9738 Filed 4-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5784 

To reduce deficits and government spending through the elimination of 

wasteful defense subsidies and programs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 20, 2010 

Mr. WELCH (for himself and Mr. PETERS) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To reduce deficits and government spending through the 

elimination of wasteful defense subsidies and programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reduce and End our 

5 Deficits Using Commonsense Eliminations in the Defense 

6 Programs Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF CERTAIN MAJOR WEAPON SYS8 TEMS. 

9 (a) C–17 AIRCRAFT.—None of the funds authorized 

10 to be appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5784 IH

1 year 2011 or any fiscal year thereafter for aircraft pro2 curement, Air Force, may be obligated or expended for 

3 the procurement of C–17 aircraft. 

4 (b) EP–X AIRCRAFT.—None of the funds authorized 

5 to be appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal 

6 year 2011 or any fiscal year thereafter for aircraft pro7 curement, Navy, or research, development, test, and eval8 uation, Navy, may be obligated or expended for the pro9 curement or the research, development, test, or evaluation 

10 of EP–X aircraft. 

11 (c) CG(X) VESSEL.—None of the funds authorized 

12 to be appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal 

13 year 2011 or any fiscal year thereafter for shipbuilding 

14 and conversion, Navy, or research, development, test, and 

15 evaluation, Navy, may be obligated or expended for the 

16 procurement or the research, development, test, or evalua17 tion of CG(X) vessels. 

18 SEC. 3. CONSOLIDATION OF ADMINISTRATION OF DEFENSE 

19 EXCHANGE STORES SYSTEM. 

20 Section 2487 of title 10, United States Code, is 

21 amended by adding at the end the following new sub22 section: 

23 ‘‘(c) CONSOLIDATION OF ADMINISTRATION OF DE24 FENSE EXCHANGE STORES SYSTEM.— 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5784 IH

1 ‘‘(1) CONSOLIDATION REQUIRED.—Not later 

2 than January 1, 2012, the Secretary of Defense 

3 shall consolidate the Army and Air Force Exchange 

4 Service, the Navy Exchange Command, and the Ma5 rine Corps exchange system into a single organiza6 tion for the administration of the defense exchange 

7 stores system. 

8 ‘‘(2) PROHIBITION ON USE OF APPROPRIATED

9 FUNDS.—Upon the consolidation of the defense ex10 change stores system under paragraph (1), appro11 priated funds may not be used to support the oper12 ation of exchange stores.’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 10.59**

**Summary of Loan Agreement by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Eastern Branch, Agricultural Bank of China dated September 7, 2006.**

| **Summary of the main articles**    |
|-------------------------------------|
| •                              | Contract   number: No. 81101200600001528 |
| •                              | Loan Principal:   RMB 20 million; |
| •                              | Loan term: six   months starting from the date loan is actually provided to the Company. |
| •                              | Interest   rate: fixed rate of 5.58%; |
|                                | • | Penalty   interest rate for delayed repayment: 5.58% plus 50% *5.58%; |
|                                | • | Penalty   interest rate for embezzlement of loan proceeds: 5.58% * 2; |
| •                              | Purpose of   the loan is to provide working capital for the Company; |
| •                              | Advanced   repayment of loan needs to be approved by the Lender; |
| •                              | Breach of   contract penalties: suspension of loan not yet provided, demand prepayment of   loan principal and interest before maturity; imposition of punitive interest;   compensation for the Lender’s expenses incurred due to the Company’s breach   of contract such as lawyer’s fee, travel cost in case of litigation, etc. |
| **Summary of the articles omitted** |
| •                              | Types of the   loan |
| •                              | Clearing of   the loan interest |
| •                              | Conditions   precedent to the drawing of the loan |
| •                              | Rights and   obligations of the Borrower |
| •                              | Rights and   obligations of the Lender |
| •                              | Guarantee of   the loan |
| •                              | Dispute   settlement |
| •                              | Miscellaneous |
| •                              | Validity |
| •                              | Notes |
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 7728** 

TIMOTHY EUGENE BROWN , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Director , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States Distric t Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. Anthony J
. Trenga , District Judge. ( 1:10

- cv - 00773

- AJT

- JFA )

Submitted : February 28 , 2011 Decided: March 9, 2011

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Dismiss ed by un published per curiam opinion
. Timothy Eugene Brown, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Timothy Eugene Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U. S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutiona l claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive
proc edural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Brown has not made the requisite showing. Accordin gly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials3 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
D ISMISSED
* Judge Widener did not participate in consideration of this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-1051
In Re: CHARLES D. COUNTS, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, District Judge. (MC-96-25-A) Submitted: May 1, 1997 Decided: May 8, 1997 Before WIDENER * and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles D. Counts, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his motions for leave to file actions in the district court. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. In re Counts , No. MC-96-25-A (W.D. Va. Dec. 19, 1996). Additionally, we deny Appellant's motion for judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
exv10w10wa






Exhibit 10.10(a)


June 9, 2009




AAA Capital Management Inc.

1300 Post Oak Blvd. #350

Houston, Texas 77056


Attention: Mr. Anthony Annunziato




     Re: Management Agreement Renewals



Dear Mr. Annunziato:



We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which
reference is made below (the “Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management
Agreements through June 30, 2010 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain
unchanged.





	 	•	 	Smith Barney AAA Energy Fund L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	Citigroup AAA Energy Fund L.P. II
	 
	 	•	 	Citigroup AAA Master Fund LLC
	 
	 	•	 	Citigroup Orion Futures Fund L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	Citigroup Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	CMF Institutional Futures Portfolio L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	Legion Strategies LLC
	 
	 	•	 	Citigroup Energy Advisors Portfolio L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	Citigroup Global Futures Fund LTD
	 
	 	•	 	Citigroup Orion Futures Fund (Cayman) LTD.




Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it
to the attention of Ms. Jennifer Magro at the address above or fax to 212-793-1986. If you have any
questions I can be reached at 212-559-5046.



Very truly yours,



CITIGROUP MANAGED FUTURES LLC




	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Jennifer Magro
	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Jennifer Magro	 	 
	 

	 	Chief Financial Officer & Director	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	AAA CAPITAL MANAGEMENT INC.

	 
	By:

	 	/s/ A. Anthony Annunziato	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	Print Name: A. Anthony Annunziato	 	 






JM/sr
IB 

Union Calendar No. 129 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2620 

[Report No. 114–174] 

To amend the United States Cotton Futures Act to exclude certain cotton 

futures contracts from coverage under such Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 2, 2015 

Mr. DAVID SCOTT of Georgia (for himself, Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia, Mr. 

WESTMORELAND, and Mr. BISHOP of Georgia) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

JUNE 23, 2015 

Additional sponsors: Mr. CRAWFORD and Mr. GIBSON

JUNE 23, 2015 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on June 2, 2015] 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2620 RH

A BILL 

To amend the United States Cotton Futures Act to exclude 

certain cotton futures contracts from coverage under 

such Act. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2620 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXCLUDING CERTAIN COTTON FUTURES CON4 TRACTS FROM COVERAGE UNDER UNITED 

5 STATES COTTON FUTURES ACT. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c)(1) of the United 

7 States Cotton Futures Act (7 U.S.C. 15B(c)(1)) is amend8 ed— 

9 (1) by striking ‘‘except that any cotton futures 

10 contract’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘except that— 

11 ‘‘(A) any cotton futures contract’’; 

12 (2) in subparagraph (A) (as designated by para13 graph (1)), by striking the period at the end and in14 serting ‘‘; and’’; and 

15 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub16 paragraph: 

17 ‘‘(B) any cotton futures contract that per18 mits tender of cotton grown outside of the United 

19 States is excluded from the coverage of this para20 graph and section to the extent that the cotton 

21 grown outside of the United States is tendered 

22 for delivery under the cotton futures contract.’’. 

23 (b) APPLICATION.—The amendments made by sub24 section (a) shall apply with respect to cotton futures conVerDate Sep 11 2014 21:51 Jun 23, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6203 E:\BILLS\H2620.RH H2620

asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
4 

•HR 2620 RH

1 tracts entered into on or after the date of the enactment 

2 of this Act. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 129 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2620 

[Report No. 114–174] 

A BILL 

To amend the United States Cotton Futures Act to 

erage under such Act. exclude certain cotton futures contracts from covJUNE 23, 2015 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Comand ordered to be printed mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Cesar Julio Medina CORADO and Ana Luisa Medina, Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-73751.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 5, 2011.*

Filed April 26, 2011.

Stephen Shaiken, Law Office of Stephen Shaiken, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, OIL, Joan Estelle Smiley, Esquire, U.S. Department *785of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: B. FLETCHER, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Cesar Julio Medina Corado, a native and citizen of Guatemala, and Ana Luisa Medina, a native and citizen of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their applications for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review the agency’s continuous physical presence determination for substantial evidence. *Ibarra-Flores v. Gonzales,*439 F.3d 614, 618 (9th Cir.2006). We grant the petition for review and remand.

An intervening change in the law requires us to remand on the issue of Ana Luisa Medina’s continuous physical presence. In *Tapia v. Gonzales,*430 F.3d 997, 998 (9th Cir.2005), we concluded “that being turned away at the border by immigration officials does not have the same effect as an administrative voluntary departure and does not itself interrupt the accrual of continuous physical presence.” It appears from the record that Medina’s departure in 1996 was a border turnaround or an uninformed voluntary departure, as opposed to a knowing acceptance of administrative voluntary departure. *See id.*at 1004; *Cf. Gutierrez v. Mukasey,*521 F.3d 1114, 1117-8 (9th Cir.2008) (petitioner’s testimony that he had the opportunity to go before an IJ and chose to depart instead is sufficient to establish presence-breaking voluntary departure). We therefore grant the petition for review and remand for further proceedings.

In light of this disposition, we need not reach petitioners’ remaining contentions.

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
# C_2021459EN.01002701.xml

| 12.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 459/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 459/27

---

EUROPEAN MARITIME SAFETY AGENCY

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2020

(2021/C 459/27)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://www.emsa.europa.eu/publications/financial-texts/26-financial-statements.html

---
Exhibit 32.1   WORLDNET, INC. OF NEVADA   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  The undersigned executive officer of WorldNet, Inc. of Nevada certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  1. the annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:  March 27, 2009/s/ Donald R. Mayer
Donald R. Mayer
Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer