alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
knightjpm.htm - Generated by SEC Publisher for SEC Filing


 



Exhibit 10.1(c)







 

JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association 

P.O. Box 161 

60 Victoria Embankment 

London EC4Y 0JP

England

     March 26, 2010 

To: Knight Capital Group, Inc.

545 Washington Boulevard 

Jersey City, NJ 07310 

Attention: Treasurer 

Telephone No.: 201-222-9400 

Facsimile No.: 201-748-5521

Re: Amendment to Call Option Transaction

     This letter agreement (this “Amendment”) amends the terms and conditions of the call option transaction (the “Transaction”) evidenced by the letter agreement between JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, London Branch (“Dealer”) and Knight Capital Group, Inc. (“Counterparty”) dated as of March 15, 2010 (the “Confirmation”).

     1. Definitions. Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Confirmation.

     2. Representations and Warranties of Counterparty. Each of the representations and warranties made pursuant to the Agreement and the Confirmation on the Trade Date are hereby deemed to be repeated on the date hereof as if references to the Trade Date were references to the date hereof.

       3. Amendments. The Confirmation is hereby amended as follows: 

(a) The “Number of Options” shall be increased by 50,000. 

(b) The “Applicable Percentage” shall be 68.293%.

     4. Effectiveness. This Amendment shall become effective upon the Additional Closing Date (as defined in the Purchase Agreement). Upon the effectiveness of this Amendment, all references in the Confirmation to the “Transaction” will be deemed to be to the Transaction as amended hereby. Except as amended hereby, all the terms of the Transaction and provisions in the Confirmation shall remain and continue in full force and effect and are hereby confirmed in all respects.

     5. Counterparts. This Amendment may be signed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original, with the same effect as if all of the signatures thereto and hereto were upon the same instrument.

     6. Governing Law. The provisions of this Amendment shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York law (without reference to choice of law doctrine).








 

 

       Please confirm that the foregoing correctly sets forth the terms of our agreement by executing this Amendment and returning it to EDG Confirmation Group, J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc., 277 Park Avenue, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10172-3401, or by fax to (212) 622 8519.

Very truly yours,



J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., as agent for

JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association

By: /s/ Jeffrey Zajkowski                                       

Authorized Signatory

Name: Jeffrey Zajkowski

 

Accepted and confirmed 

as of the date set forth above:

Knight Capital Group, Inc.

By: /s/ Steven Bisgay                                        

Authorized Signatory

Name: Steven Bisgay
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Cancer Advisory Panel for Complementary and Alternative Medicine.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(9)(B), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended because the premature disclosure of program documents—PAC and the discussions would likely to significantly frustrate implementation of recommendations.

*Name of Committee:*                         Cancer Advisory Panel for Complementary and Alternative Medicine.                    

*Date:*                         April 19, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         2:30 PM to 5:00 PM.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate the Gonzalez Regiment.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bldg. 31, Room 5B5B, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Richard Nahin, PhD, Executive Secretary, Cancer Advisory Panel for Complementary, and Alternative Medicine, NCCAM, NIH, 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 31, Room 5B37, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-2013.                     

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

Dated: April 6, 2000.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-9436  Filed 4-14-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 575 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 575

     To increase the level of participation of the Small Business 
 Administration in certain guaranteed loans for a period of one year, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 15, 2009

 Mr. Gerlach introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To increase the level of participation of the Small Business 
 Administration in certain guaranteed loans for a period of one year, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASED LEVEL OF PARTICIPATION IN CERTAIN GUARANTEED 
              LOANS.

    For the period of one year beginning on the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Small Business Administration shall treat the dollar 
amount specified in clause (i) and in clause (ii) of section 7(a)(2)(A) 
of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(a)(2)(A)) as if such amount is 
$500,000.
                                 <all>
```
#### Foley Productions, Inc., Respondent, v Singer Corporation, Appellant.

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and defendant’s motion granted. Memorandum: The sole question presented on this motion for summary judgment is the interpretation of a written distributorship agreement between the parties. Paragraph 18 (c) of the agreement provided that the agreement could be terminated by defendant in the event that it decided to discontinue dealing in or with the products; it also provided that plaintiff was to be given "a 90 day written advance notice of any such decision”. Defendant submitted affidavits and documentary evidence establishing that on or about May 24, 1985 it gave plaintiff the required 90-day written notice of its decision to discontinue dealing in or with the products. In opposition, plaintiff claimed that its "understanding” of the termination provisions of the agreement differed from that of defendant and asserted that the notice of May 24, 1985 was not timely.

Where, as here, the intention of the parties is plainly expressed in clear, unambiguous terms, the question is one of law, appropriately decided by the court on a motion for summary judgment *(see, Long Is. R. R. Co. v Northville Indus. Corp.,*41 NY2d 455, 461; *Mallad Constr. Corp. v County Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn., 32*NY2d 285, 290-291). The record is clear that defendant gave plaintiff the required 90-day written notice of its decision to discontinue dealing in or with the products. Thus, it properly complied with the provisions of the written agreement with respect to termination of the distributorship agreement. Since plaintiff failed to establish the existence of any material issue of fact requiring trial, defendant’s motion for summary judgment must be granted. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Davis, J.—partial summary judgment.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2357 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2357

To direct the Securities and Exchange Commission to revise Form S-3 so 
    as to add listing and registration of a class of common equity 
securities on a national securities exchange as an additional basis for 
satisfying the requirements of General Instruction I.B.1. of such form 
and to remove such listing and registration as a requirement of General 
                    Instruction I.B.6. of such form.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 15, 2015

 Mrs. Wagner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Securities and Exchange Commission to revise Form S-3 so 
    as to add listing and registration of a class of common equity 
securities on a national securities exchange as an additional basis for 
satisfying the requirements of General Instruction I.B.1. of such form 
and to remove such listing and registration as a requirement of General 
                    Instruction I.B.6. of such form.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Accelerating Access to Capital Act 
of 2015''.

SEC. 2. EXPANDED ELIGIBILITY FOR USE OF FORM S-3.

    Not later than 45 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the Securities and Exchange Commission shall revise Form S-3--
            (1) so as to permit securities to be registered pursuant to 
        General Instruction I.B.1. of such form provided that either--
                    (A) the aggregate market value of the voting and 
                non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the 
                registrant is $75,000,000 or more; or
                    (B) the registrant has at least one class of common 
                equity securities listed and registered on a national 
                securities exchange; and
            (2) so as to remove the requirement of paragraph (c) from 
        General Instruction I.B.6. of such form.
                                 <all>
```
Electronically Filed 

Supreme Court 

SCWC-30096 

01-DEC-2011 

08:53 AM 

NO. SCWC-30096
 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I 

DAVID L. WOODARD, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,
 

vs.
 

EDWARD TABANARA and CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU,


Respondents/Defendants-Appellees.
 

 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
 

(ICA NO. 30096; CIV. NO. 08-1-0132)
 

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
 

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, JJ.,


and Circuit Judge To'oto'o, in place of McKenna, J., recused)
 

Upon consideration of David L. Woodard’s motion for 

reconsideration of order dismissing application for writ of 

certiorari filed on November 22, 2011, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is denied. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, December 1, 2011. 

Walter R. Schoettle on 

the motion for petitioner/


plaintiff-appellant.
 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald


/s/ Paula A. Nakayama 

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. 

/s/ James E. Duffy, Jr. 

/s/ Fa'auuga To'oto'o
**Exhibit 10.2****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No.333-12256) and Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-81300) of InfoVista SA of our reportdated July 27, 2004, except for Notes 1 and 2, for which the date is October 14, 2005, relating tothe financial statements of InfoVista SA, which appears in the Annual Report on Form 20-F ofInfoVista SA for the year ended June 30, 2005.Neuilly-sur-Seine, France
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 57 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 57

 To amend the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 to permit 
 eligibility in certain circumstances for an officer or employee of a 
 foreign government to receive a reward under the Department of State 
                            Rewards Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 2009

   Mr. Kirk introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 to permit 
 eligibility in certain circumstances for an officer or employee of a 
 foreign government to receive a reward under the Department of State 
                            Rewards Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Terrorist Rewards Enhancement Act of 
2009''.

SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY IN CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES FOR AN AGENCY OF A FOREIGN 
              GOVERNMENT TO RECEIVE A REWARD UNDER THE DEPARTMENT OF 
              STATE REWARDS PROGRAM.

    (a) Eligibility.--Subsection (f) of section 36 of the State 
Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 U.S.C. 2708(f)) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``(f) Ineligibility.--An officer'' and 
        inserting the following:
    ``(f) Ineligibility.--
            ``(1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), an 
        officer''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(2) Exception in certain circumstances.--The Secretary 
        may pay a reward to an officer or employee of a foreign 
        government (or any entity thereof) who, while in the 
        performance of his or her official duties, furnishes 
        information described in such subsection, if the Secretary 
        determines that such payment satisfies the following 
        conditions:
                    ``(A) Such payment is appropriate in light of the 
                exceptional or high-profile nature of the information 
                furnished pursuant to such subsection.
                    ``(B) Such payment may aid in furnishing further 
                information described in such subsection.
                    ``(C) Such payment is formally requested by such 
                agency.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Subsection (b) of such section (22 
U.S.C. 2708(b)) is amended in the matter preceding paragraph (1) by 
inserting ``or to an officer or employee of a foreign government in 
accordance with subsection (f)(2)'' after ``individual''.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #17143 and #17144; NEW JERSEY Disaster Number NJ-00062]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 2.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of New Jersey (FEMA-4614-DR), dated 09/05/2021.

*Incident:* Remnants of Hurricane Ida.

*Incident Period:* 09/01/2021 through 09/03/2021.

# DATES:

Issued on 09/11/2021.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:* 11/04/2021.

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:* 06/06/2022.

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for the State of New Jersey, dated 09/05/2021, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster:

*Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans):* Morris.

*Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):* All contiguous counties have previously been declared.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James Rivera,

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2021-20049 Filed 9-15-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6433

MILTON MORENO,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

ALTON BASKERVILLE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District

Judge. (CA-03-430)

Submitted: April 29, 2004 Decided: May 6, 2004

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Milton Moreno, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen R. McCullough, Assistant

Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Milton Moreno seeks to appeal the district court’s order

dismissing as untimely filed his petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a

habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000).

When, as here, a district court dismisses a § 2254 petition solely

on procedural grounds, a certificate of appealability will not

issue unless the petitioner can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists

of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a

valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that

jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district

court was correct in its procedural ruling.’” Rose v. Lee, 252

F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir. 2001) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S.

473, 484 (2000)). We have independently reviewed the record and

conclude that Moreno has not made the requisite showing. See

Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003). Accordingly, we

deny Moreno’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a

certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT
32.2





Certification
of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








I, James
M. Sullivan, Chief Financial Officer of Solutia Inc. (the “Company”), certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that to the best of my knowledge:








(1)
            the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
      ended March 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








Dated:
May 7, 2009


/s/ James M.
Sullivan


James M. Sullivan


Executive Vice President


and Chief
Financial Officer

















A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Solutia Inc. and will be retained by
Solutia Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.