alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-QSB
for the period ended June 30, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           5,702
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,066
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      5,526
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          13,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            12,599
<LOANS>                                        109,088
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,053
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 140,688
<DEPOSITS>                                     113,855
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              8,555
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            35
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,243
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 140,688
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,991
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  541
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   142
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 4,674
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,928
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,973
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,702
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      245
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,517
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    787
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         787
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       490
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.66
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   886
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       78
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,053
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,053
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
# Direct Filing Addresses for Form I-131, Application for Travel Document

Use the chart below to determine where you must file your Form I-131, Application for Travel Document, if you are not filing online via myUSCIS.gov.

If you do not submit your application to the appropriate direct filing address, it may take longer for us to process your case.

We generally send parole requests filed by individuals currently in removal proceedings or previously removed from the United States to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for review.

Call the USCIS Contact Center at 800-375-5283 (TTY: 800-767-1833) for assistance.

**E-Notification**: If you want to receive an e-mail and/or a text message that we have accepted your form at a USCIS lockbox, complete Form G-1145, E-Notification of Application/Petition Acceptance and clip it to the first page of your form.

03/04/2024

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of MBT Financial Corp.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
   Date:  March 6, 2009
    /s/ John L. SkibskiJohn L. SkibskiChief Financial Officer 58
ex10_2.htm


EXHIBIT 10.2


 


 



	09-0204  	BARD B10DIESEL/FAIRLESS HILLS





 


COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA 


DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 


AIR QUALITY PROGRAM


 


 



	 PLAN APPROVAL





 



 



	IssueDate:   July  31,  2008 	Effective Date:   Jujy 31, 2008
	Expiration Date:   January 31,  2010	 





 




In accordance with the provisions of the Air Pollution Control Act, the Act of January 8, 1960, P.L. 2119, as amended, and 25 Pa. Code Chapter 127, the Owner, [and Operator if noted] (hereinafter referred to as permittee) identified below is authorized by the Department of Environmental Protection (Department) to construct, install, modify or reactivate the air emission source(s) more fully described in the site inventory list. This Facility is subject to all terms and conditions specified in this plan approval. Nothing in this plan approval relieves the permittee from its obligations to comply with all applicable Federal, State and Local laws and regulations.


 


The regulatory or statutory authority for each plan approval condition is set forth in brackets. All terms and conditions in this permit are federally enforceable unless otherwise designated as "State-Only" requirements.


 


Plan Approval No. 09-0204 


 


Federal Tax Id - Plant Code: 20-8876139-1


 



	
 


Plan Approval Description


 


A plan approval for the construction and operation of a new biodiesel research and development facility. A chemical process is employed to extract oil from soybeans and process the soybean oil for production as biodiesel. Sources of emissions include soybean preparation, solvent extraction, and biodiesel/glycerin processes.  


 


	
 


Owner Information 


 


                                 Name: BIOFUEL ADVANCE RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT (BARD) 


             Mailing Address: KIPC, 1 BEN FAIR LESS DR


                                             FAIRLESS HILLS, PA 19030-5001


	
 


Plant Information


 


             Plant: BARD BIODIESEL/FAIRLESS HILLS



      Location: 09   Bucks County                         09002 Falls Township


      SIC Code: 2869 Manufacturing - Industrial Organic Chemicals, Nec




	
 


Responsible Official



 


     Name: SURAJIET KHANNA


   Title: CHAIRMAN 


Phone: (215) 825 - 8593




 


	
 


Plan Approval Contact Person



 


  Name: SURAJIET J KHANNA


Title: CHAIRMAN Phone: (215) 825 - 8593


 


	
 


 


[SIGNATURE] 


FRANC1NE B CARLINI, SOUTHEAST REGION AIR PROGRAM MANAGER
#### In the Matter of Frank A. Caminiti, Appellant, v New York City Transit Authority Police Department, Respondent.

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York City Transit Authority Police Department terminating the petitioner’s employment as a probationary New York City Transit Police Officer, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pizzuto, J.), dated March 26, 1986, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The petitioner’s challenge to the validity of his initial 18-month probationary period is time barred pursuant to CPLR 217. The petitioner was advised of the applicable probationary period sometime in February 1982 during roll call in the New York City Police Department Police Academy. Any challenge to the validity of the 18-month period had to have been commenced within four months after the petitioner was informed of this condition *(see, Matter of Colon v New York City Tr. Police Dept.,*114 AD2d 956).

As a probationary employee, termination of the petitioner’s employment could be effected without a hearing and without specific reasons being stated and, in the absence of bad faith or reasons prohibited by law, the determination will be upheld *307
      *(see, e.g., Matter of Leon v Meehan,*67 NY2d 613; *see also, Montero v Lum,*68 NY2d 253, 259-260). The petitioner’s employment was not improperly terminated pursuant to Executive Law § 296, which provides that it is an unlawful discriminatory practice to discharge an employee because of a disability. Executive Law § 292 (21) defines disability as follows: "21. The term 'disability’ means (a) a physical, mental or medical impairment resulting from anatomical, physiological or neurological conditions which prevents the exercise of a normal bodily function or is demonstrable by medically accepted clinical or laboratory diagnostic techniques or (b) a record of such an impairment or (c) a condition regarded by others as such an impairment, provided, however, that *in all provisions of this article dealing with employment, the term shall be limited to disabilities which do not prevent the complainant from performing in a reasonable manner the activities involved in the job or occupation sought or held”*(emphasis supplied).

It is undisputed that the petitioner cannot be placed on patrol duty, the most important function of a police officer. The petitioner is, therefore, unable to reasonably do what the position requires, and in light of this, the termination of his employment was proper *(see, Matter of Miller v Ravitch,*60 NY2d 527). Mangano, J. P., Weinstein, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.
# Notes from Previous Engagements

For material older than three years or that is no longer current, see our Archive Outreach section.

The Asylum Division of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services routinely provides detailed asylum and credible fear data as part of a statistical package made available during regularly scheduled, quarterly stakeholder engagement meetings. You can find asylum and credible fear data by viewing the stakeholder meetings listed on this page or you can find the data sets on the Immigration and Citizenship Data page.

Temporary Protected Status for Venezuela

October 27, 2023

USCIS Refugee Processing Quarterly Stakeholder Engagement

June 20, 2023

USCIS Fiscal Year 2023 Citizenship and Integration Grant Program

June 15, 2023

Asylum Quarterly Stakeholder Engagement

June 13, 2023

Learn How Certain Afghan Nationals Can Apply for the Re-Parole Application Process

June 06, 2023

Naturalization Test Redesign

May 31, 2023

USCIS Online Account Overview for Afghan Nationals to Prepare for New Re-parole Application Process

May 19, 2023

Naturalization Test Redesign

April 11, 2023

H-1B Electronic Registration Process

January 31, 2023

National Webinar on the New Process for Venezuelans

October 19, 2022

1 - 10 total rows

-  Back
- Next**

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 22, 2015

s1214

Order 

Clerk

December 22, 2015

151032

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 151032

COA: 317382

Wayne CC: 12-003028-FC

NORWOOD WITHERSPOON, a/k/a NORMAN

WITHERSPOON,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 18, 2014 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Chinawe.com Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Man Keung Wai, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|  |           |                                                                                                                       |
|--|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (1)  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|  |           |                                                                                                                                                     |
|--|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (2)  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |

/s/ Man Keung Wai                    Chief Executive Officer

August 14, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Chinawe.com Inc. and will be retained by Chinawe.com Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
#### SULLIVAN, Respondent, v. BROOKS et al., Appellants.

(City Court of New York, General Term.

May 18, 1894.)

Action by John Sullivan against William Brooks and another.

Argued before EHRLICH, C. J., and VAN WYCK, J.

Alex. Thain, for appellants.

Edwin G. Davis, for respondent.

*1151VAN WYCK, J.

The action is for damages for personal Injuries received by reason of the negligence of defendants’ servant in so a horses as to cause the wagon to run upon plaintiff, and crush his leg. The verdict was for plaintiff for $250, and is not excessive. The defendants duly excepted to the denial of their motion to nonsuit, on the grounds that the proof did not show that plaintiff was free from negligence, or that defendants had been guilty of carelessness, and did show that plaintiff’s negligence had contributed to the accident. The plaintiff, a hod carrier, says that he was shoveling sand from a pile into a coal hole in the sidewalk, when the driver turned his wagon and team, and, before plaintiff knew anything, he was run down, and did not see the team as it backed.on him, just before it struck his leg, because he was shoveling the sand on the sidewalk, with his back towards the roadway; and that the driver never hallooed or said a word or gave any warning, and, before plaintiff knew where he was, the wagon was on his leg; and that the driver could have come up another way, and no other driver came up like him, and he could have come up as any other driver did. And two other witnesses testify that, just after the accident, the defendant Brocks said: “I am sorry, myself. The driver yesterday came-pretty near running over me, and I am going to discharge him. That driver went very near killing me, but he will never drive for me again.” However, this defendant denied making such statements. The verdict is not against the evidence or the weight of evidence, and the judgment and order appealed’ from are affirmed, with costs.

*

End of Cases in Vol. 28.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

September 2, 2020

No. 04

- 20

- 00236

- CV

Lesley WENGER , City of Castle Hills Alder man Place 4 and Sylvia Gonzalez, City of Castle Hills, Place 3 (Cross

- Appellee), Appellants

v. The STATE of Texas, ex. rel.,Mike Flinn, Bonnie Hokpe, Vince Martinez, Scott Gray, Ginger Magers, and Robbie Casey (Cross

- Appellant), Appellees

From the 438th J udicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2019

- CI

- 15722 Honorable Larry Noll , Judge Presiding



### ORDER

On August 12, 2020, we dismissed this appeal for want of prosecution. Appellants have filed a motion requesting this appeal be reinstated on the docket of the Court.

The memorandum opinion and judgment issued in this case on August 12, 2020 are WITHDRAWN

. We ORDER that this appeal is reinstated on the docket of this court. We further ORD ER that appellants’ brief shall be filed on or before October 2, 2020

. Appellees’ combined appellees’/cross

- appellants’ brief is due thirty days after the filing of appellants’ brief.

_________________________ ________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 2nd day of September, 2020

.

__________________________ _________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Petroleum Engineers**

 

MHA Petroleum Consultants, Inc. does hereby consent tothe use of its reports relating to the proved oil and gas reserves of GeoPetroResources Company and to the reference to the firm as an expert in the Form 10-KAnnual Report being filed by GeoPetro Resources Company.

 
| /s/ JOHN W. ARSENAULT           |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|
|                                 |   |
| MHA Petroleum Consultants, Inc. |   |
| John W. Arsenault                    |   |
| Vice President                       |   |
|                                 |   |
| Denver, CO                           |   |
| March 31, 2010                  |   |

 

----
Exhibit 10.32  AMENDMENT No. 1 to COMMON
STOCK AND WARRANT PURCHASE AGREEMENT  This AMENDMENT No. 1(this
Amendment), dated as of December 10, 2007, by and between
O2Diesel Corporation, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of
the State of Delaware (the Company), and Energenics Holdings Pte Ltd,
a company incorporated in Singapore (the Energenics).  W I T N E S S E T H  WHEREAS, the Company and Seller are
parties to the Common Stock and Warrant Purchase Agreement, dated October 17,
2007 (the Purchase Agreement), pursuant to which the Company is
selling to Energenics shares of the Companys common stock, par value $0.0001
per share (the Common Stock) and warrants to purchase shares of Common
Stock (Investment Warrant); and  WHEREAS, the parties wish to modify
certain provisions of the Purchase 
Agreement as provided herein.  NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the premises and the respective agreements hereinafter set
forth, the Parties hereby agree as follows:  1.AMENDMENTS TO THE PURCHASE AGREEMENT.  a.In
Section 1.1(a), the number (i) 2,551,020 is hereby deleted, and 3,333,333
is inserted in lieu thereof, and (ii) 1,275,510 is hereby deleted, and 1,666,667
is inserted in lieu thereof.  b.In
Section 1.1(b), the number US$0.50 is hereby deleted and US$0.375 is
inserted in lieu thereof.  c.In
Section 1.1(c), the phrase equal to the lesser of (i) US$0.50, or (ii) 106%
of the closing price per share (rounded to the nearest cent) of the Companys
Common Stock on the American Stock Exchange or, if the Companys Common Stock
is not listed on the American Stock Exchange, the closing price or bid per
share on such other national securities exchange or quotation system upon which
the Companys Common Stock is listed or quoted, on the date such warrants are
earned as described below is hereby deleted and of US$0.375 is inserted in
lieu thereof.  d.In
Section 1.2, (i) the number US$0.49 is hereby deleted and US$0.375
is inserted in lieu thereof, and (ii) the phrase The calculation of the
Per Share Price consists of 105% of the closing price per share of the Companys
Common Stock on the American Stock Exchange on the day before the date hereof
is hereby deleted, and The calculation of the Per Share Price consists of 121%
of the closing price per share of the


Companys Common Stock on the American Stock Exchange on the day before
the date of the Amendment.  2.MISCELLANEOUS.  a.Except as expressly provided
herein, the Purchase Agreement shall be unmodified and shall remain in full
force and effect in accordance with its terms.  b.This Amendment may be
executed in any number of counterparts, which taken together shall constitute
one and the same document.  [Remainder
of Page Intentionally Left Blank]


The foregoing Amendment is hereby executed effective as of the date
first set first set forth above.  O2DIESEL CORPORATIONBy:
  /s/ Alan R. RaeName:
  Alan R. RaeTitle:
  Chief Executive OfficerENERGENICS HOLDINGS PTE
  LTDBy:
  /s/ Ronen HazarikaName:
  Ronen HazarikaTitle:
  Director  [Signature
Page to Amendment - Share Price at $0.375]
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of AboveNet, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William G. LaPerch,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:May 7, 2010
            By:
            /s/ William G.
      LaPerchWilliam G.
      LaPerch
              Chief Executive
      Officer