alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      11,502,238
<SECURITIES>                                18,665,785
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,811,332
<PP&E>                                          74,961
<DEPRECIATION>                                  49,705
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,217,707
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,835,996
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  6,634,311
<COMMON>                                       142,993
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,604,407
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,217,707
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,401,433
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  829,755
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                571,678
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            571,678
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   571,678
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                         JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                           JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                                      10,064
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               28,498<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                                (1,307)
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            45,203
<PP&E>                                                       3,820<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              54,718
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       18,122
<BONDS>                                                        375<F3>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                       167
<OTHER-SE>                                                  36,295
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                54,718
<SALES>                                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            74,933
<CGS>                                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               66,991
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             7,335
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             459<F4>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              1,066
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   426
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            640
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   640
<EPS-BASIC>                                                   0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0.04



<FN>
<F1> Shown net of allowance for uncollectible accounts on face of Consolidated
     Balance Sheet.

<F2> Shown in this Financial Data Schedule net of related accumulated
     depreciation for consistency with Consolidated Balance Sheet.

<F2> Represents the long-term portion of capital lease obligations.

<F3> Represents interest income of the Company.
</FN>


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5717 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5717

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To authorize the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution to 
  plan, design, and construct a facility and to enter into agreements 
relating to education programs at the National Zoological Park facility 
           in Front Royal, Virginia, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Smithsonian Conservation Biology 
Institute Enhancement Act''.

SEC. 2. FACILITY FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS.

    (a) In General.--The Board of Regents of the Smithsonian 
Institution is authorized to plan, design, and construct a facility on 
National Zoological Park property in Front Royal, Virginia for the 
purpose of conducting research and educational programs.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out subsection (a)--
            (1) $1,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2010 and 2011; and
            (2) $3,000,000 in the aggregate for all succeeding fiscal 
        years.

SEC. 3. AGREEMENTS FOR HOUSING AND OTHER SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--The Board of Regents of the Smithsonian 
Institution is authorized to enter into agreements for the provision of 
housing and other services to the participants in the programs 
referenced in section 2.
    (b) Costs.--The housing and other services described in subsection 
(a) shall be provided at no cost to the Smithsonian Institution.

SEC. 4. ANIMAL HOLDING FACILITY.

    The Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution is authorized 
to plan, design, and construct animal holding and related program 
facilities on National Zoological Park property in Front Royal, 
Virginia, to be funded from nonfederal sources.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 28, 2010.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5717

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To authorize the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution to 
  plan, design, and construct a facility and to enter into agreements 
relating to education programs at the National Zoological Park facility 
           in Front Royal, Virginia, and for other purposes.
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6903

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

GARY L. DETEMPLE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr.,

District Judge. (CR-93-77; CA-00-84-5)

Submitted: January 16, 2004 Decided: February 25, 2004

Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gary L. DeTemple, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. McWilliams, Jr.,

Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

Gary L. DeTemple seeks to appeal the district court’s

orders accepting the report and recommendation of a magistrate

judge, denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000), and denying reconsideration. An appeal may not be taken

from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that DeTemple has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Exhibit 13.1

CHINA MOBILE LIMITED

Certification

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned, LI Yue, Executive Director and Chief Executive Officer of China Mobile Limited (the Company), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the year
ended December 31, 2015 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 26, 2016



/s/ LI YueName:

LI YueTitle:

Executive Director and Chief Executive Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being
filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
exv10w3wa






Exhibit 10.3(a)


June 9, 2009


AAA Capital Management Inc.

1300 Post Oak Blvd. #350

Houston, Texas 77056


Attention: Mr. Anthony Annunziato



	 	Re:	 	 Management Agreement Renewal





Dear Mr. Annunziato:


We are
writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which
reference is made below (the “Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management
Agreements through June 30, 2010 and all other provisions of the
Management Agreements will remain
unchanged.



	 	•	 	Smith Barney AAA Energy Fund L.P.
	 	•	 	Citigroup AAA Energy Fund L.P. II
	 	•	 	Citigroup AAA Master Fund LLC
	 	•	 	Citigroup Orion Futures Fund L.P.
	 	•	 	Citigroup Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
	 	•	 	CMF Institutional Futures Portfolio L.P.
	 	•	 	Legion Strategies LLC
	 	•	 	Citigroup Energy Advisors Portfolio L.P.
	 	•	 	Citigroup Global Futures Fund LTD
	 	•	 	Citigroup Orion Futures Fund (Cayman) LTD.





Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it
to the attention of Ms. Jennifer Magro at the address above or fax to 212-793-1986. If you have any
questions I can be reached at 212-559-5046.



 



    Very truly yours,



 



    CITIGROUP MANAGED FUTURES LLC



 


		
	    By:  	
    /s/  Jennifer
    Magro









    Jennifer Magro




    Chief Financial Officer & Director



 



AAA CAPITAL MANAGEMENT INC.






		
	    By:  	
    /s/  Anthony
    Annunziato








 



    Print Name Anthony Annunziato



 



    JM/sr
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

**CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANYING PERIODIC REPORTPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

In connection with the annual report of Dialog Semiconductor Plc (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Martin Kloeble, Vice-President of Finance and Controlling of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 /s/ Martin Kloeble			 

Martin KloebleVice President of Finance and ControllingFebruary 27, 2003
<PAGE>

                                                                   Page 24 of 24
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(h)

Key Bank USA, National Association      Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas
127 Public Square                        formally known as Bankers Trust Company
Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1306               as Indenture Trustee
                                        280 Park Avenue, 9th Floor
                                        New York, New York 10017

JPMorgan Chase Bank                     MBIA Insurance Corporation
 formally known as Bank One, National    as Securities Insurer
 Association                            113 King Street
 as Eligible Lender Trustee             Armonk, New York 10504
227 West Monroe, 26th Floor
Chicago, Illinois 60606

                         INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT
                      FOR KEYCORP STUDENT LOAN TRUST 2000-A

We have examined management's assertion, included in its representation letter
dated March 2, 2004 that Key Bank USA, National Association (KBUSA), a wholly
owned subsidiary of KeyCorp, complied with sections 4.04, 4.08(a), 4.08(b),
4.08(c), 5.05, 5.06, 5.07 and 5.08 of the KeyCorp Student Loan Trust 2000-A Sale
and Servicing Agreement and sections 1.(a)(xx), 1.(b)(iii), 2 and 3 of the
KeyCorp Student Loan Trust 2000-A Administration Agreement (collectively, the
"Agreements") as of December 31, 2003 and for the year then ended. Management is
responsible for KBUSA's compliance with those requirements. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on management's assertion about KBUSA's compliance
based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about KBUSA's
compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances, except that in accordance with
Section 5.05 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement, our examination assumed the
accuracy of reports prepared by KBUSA's student loan processor. We believe that
our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination
does not provide a legal determination on KBUSA's compliance with the specified
requirements.

In our opinion, assuming the accuracy of reports prepared by KBUSA's student
loan processor, management's assertion that KBUSA complied with the
aforementioned requirements as of December 31, 2003 and for the year then ended
is fairly stated, in all material respects.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of KBUSA, Deutsche
Bank Trust Company Americas, JPMorgan Chase Bank and MBIA Insurance Corporation
and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than for these
specified parties.

                                                  /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

March 2, 2004
Cleveland, Ohio
ex10-28_f10k12312009.htm


    Exhibit
10.27

     

     

    
      	 OIS	 www.oisi.com
	 221
      Lathrop Way, Suite I	 main
    088.338.8436
	 Sacramento, CA
      95815 	 fax
      916.646.0207
	 USA	 


    

     

     

    


    March 12,
2009

    VIA
email

    


    Uri
Ram

    19101
Kingsbury St.

    Northridge,
CA 91326

    


    Re:           Ophthalmic Imaging Systems Board
Membership

    


    Dear
Uri:

    


    On behalf
of OIS, the Company’s Board of Directors would like to thank you for accepting
its invitation to join the Board.

    


    We’re
very excited about the prospects and focus of the Company, and look forward to
your input in directing the Company to realize its potential.

    


    The
Company will pay an annual retainer in the amount of $15,000, payable in 4 equal
quarterly installments of $3,750 for your attendance at up to 3 Board meetings
per quarter.  For your services in attending meetings in excess of 3
per quarter, the Company will pay you at the rate of $100 per hour up to a
maximum of $500 per day.

    


    In case
the board will nominate you to be the Chairman of the board, the company will
pay an annual retainer in the amount of $24,000 as long as you serve as the
chairman, payable in 4 equal quarterly installments of $6,000 for your
attendance at up to 5 Board meetings per quarter.  For your services
in attending meetings in excess of 5 per quarter, the Company will pay you at
the rate of $100 per hour up to a maximum of $500 per day.

    


    The
company will recommend to the board to grant you 30,000 stock options according
to the company standard terms (vesting semi-annually over three
years).

    


    Please
indicate your formal acceptance of the foregoing by signing and dating where
indicated below.  At your earliest convenience, please return via
facsimile the executed copy of page 2 to the attention of Mr. Gil Allon at the
Company’s offices at (916) 646-0207.

    


    Again, we
welcome you and thank you for joining us during this very exciting time for the
Company.

    


    Very
truly yours,

    


    Gil
Allon

    Chief
Executive Officer

    Ophthalmic
Imaging Systems


     

    
      	 	/s/ Uri
      Ram 	 	 3/13/09	 
	 Approved:	 Uri
      Ram 	 	 Date	 
	 	 
	 	 
	Better
      Insight.  Better Sight.
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the 10k-SB/A of American  Utilicraft  Corporation  (the
"Company"),  the undersigned  officers hereby certify that the Company's amended
annual report on Form 10-KSB/A for the year that ended on December 31, 2002 (the
"Report"),  as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date
hereof,

     a)   fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78M or 78O (D)); and

     b)   that information  contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in
          all  material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
          operations of the issuer

     This certificate is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not
be  deemed  to be a part  of the  Report  or  "filed"  for  any  other  purposes
whatsoever.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this certificate to be signed by
it Chief Financial Officer and its Principal Accounting Officer this 28th day of
October, 2004.


/s/ John J. Dupont                                   /s/ M. Karen Shoemaker
---------------------------------------             ----------------------------
John J. Dupont                                      M. Karen Shoemaker
President and Chief Executive Officer               Principal Accounting Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Neal Christopher GAUGHRAN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-15265

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

June 9, 2011.

Anne R. Schultz, Wifredo A. Ferrer, Suzan H. Ponzoli, Kathleen M. Salyer, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, Carmen M. Lineberger, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Fort Pierce, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

David Lee Brannon, Federal Public Defender’s Office, West Palm Beach, FL, Kathleen M. Williams, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Miami, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before TJOFLAT, MARTIN, and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

In appealing his prison sentence of 210 months imposed following a plea of guilty to receipt of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2), appellant raises one issue: whether the district court, in determining the Guidelines sentencing range, erred in enhancing the base offense level (for the offense) by five levels, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2(b)(3)(B), for distribution with the expectation of receipt of a “thing of value” based on his alleged use of peer-to-peer file-sharing software. We resolve the issue against appellant and therefore affirm.

We review the district court’s factual findings for clear error and its application of the Sentencing Guidelines to those facts *de novo. United States v. Bender,*290 F.3d 1279, 1284 (11th Cir.2002). “For a factual finding to be clearly erroneous, [we], after reviewing all of the evidence, must be left with a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” *United States v. Rodriguez-Lopez,*363 F.3d 1134, 1137 (11th Cir.2004) (internal quotations omitted).

The base offense level of a § 2252(a)(2) offense is enhanced by five levels under § 2G2.2(b)(3)(B) if the offense involved the “distribution for the receipt, or expectation of receipt, of a thing of value, but not for pecuniary gain....” U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2(b)(3)(B). Child pornography can constitute a “thing of value” for purposes of the enhancement. U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2, *878comment, (n.l). “Distribution” is defined as including “posting material involving the sexual exploitation of a minor ... for public viewing but does not include the mere solicitation of such material by a defendant.” *Id.*When a defendant distributes child pornography with the expectation that he will receive other child pornography in exchange, the district court may properly apply this enhancement. *Bender,*290 F.3d at 1286.

Appellant has not shown that the district court clearly erred in applying the § 2G2.2(b)(3)(B) enhancement. We are not left with the “definite and firm” conviction that the court made a mistake because it could reasonably find on the record before it that appellant was aware of the nature of his file-sharing program and had the expectation of receiving additional child pornography in exchange with those who accessed his shared folder.

AFFIRMED.