alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**

This First Amendment to the July 8, 2008 Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”) by and among Westell Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), Westell, Inc., an Illinois corporation (the “Operating Subsidiary”) and Bernard F. Sergesketter (“Executive”) is entered into the 29th day of September, 2008 with effectiveness as of July 8, 2008.

WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement so as to make Executive eligible for participation in the Operating Subsidiary’s 401(k) plan, effective as of the commencement of employment on July 8, 2008;

NOW THEREFORE,  the parties agree as follows:

1. The existing last sentence of Section 2.1 of the Agreement is deleted and two new sentences are added in its place to read as follows

“Executive shall be entitled to participate in the Operating Subsidiary’s 401(k) plan.  Except for such participation and except for the stock option described in Section 2.2 below, Executive shall not be eligible to participate in any bonus, retirement, vacation, Section 125 spending account, medical or vision coverage, disability, life insurance, stock purchase, or other benefit plans, practices, policies or programs of the Company. “

2. Except as amended hereby, the Agreement remains in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement effective as of the date and year first above written.

Westell Technologies, Inc.

By: /s/ John W. Seaholtz

|   | Chairman of the board |
|--------|-----------------------|

Westell, Inc.

By: /s/ John W. Seaholtz

|   | Chairman of the board |
|--------|-----------------------|

/s/ Bernard F. Sergesketter

Bernard F. Sergesketter
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

UNITED STATES COAST GUAR-D

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD.

Complainant,

JOSEPH ROBERT MCCANN.

Respondent,

Docket Numbers: 2022-0467 and 2023-0I06

f,nforcement Activity Numbers: 7542659 and 7642885

CONSENT ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT ANI)

ORDER CANCELING HEARING

Bv: Honorable Walter J. Brudzinski. Chief Administrative Law Judge

Issued: May 1. 2023

Appearances:

MS. JENNIFER A. MEHAFFEY, ESQ.

LCDR ORLAI\IDO HERNAIIDEZ

USCG Suspension and Revocation National Center ofExpertise

For the Coast Guard

MR. BRIAN MCEWING, ESQ.

MR. ANTHONY SABITSKY, ESQ.

Reeves McEwing, LLP

Attorneys for the Respondent

vs.
HON . WALTER J. BRUDZINSKI

CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVELAW ruDGE

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

CONSENT ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT ANI)

ORDER CANCELING HEARING

The United States Coast Guard (Coast Guard) submitted a Motion for Consent Order

Approving Settlement Agreement on April 24,2024. The Settlement Agreement resolves two

administrative proceedings pending against Joseph Robert McCann (Respondent), Docket

Number 2022-0467 and Docket Number 2023-0106.r I have carefully reviewed the terms of

the agreement, and find that it is fair and reasonable, and in substantial compliance with the

requirements of 33 C.F.R. $ 20.502.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the record, it is hereby ORDERED that the Settlement

Agreement is APPROVED in full and incorporated herein by reference'

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED' this Consent Order shall constitute full' final' and

complete adjudication ofDocket No' 2022-0467 and DocketNo' 2023-0106 '

rr IS FURTHER .RDERED, the hearing scheduled to commence on May r0,2023 in

New York, NY is CANCELED'

Done and dated MaY 1' 2023

New York, NY u"e/l e;r^

---------"----- .ies' Joint Motion to Consolidate Docket N os' 2022-0467 and2023'0106 for

I On April 28, 2023, I granted the Part

Settlement. 2
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-19-00457-CR

Ruben Nunez Jr.

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

430th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CR-5021-18-J

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

March 18, 2021
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 75 (Tuesday, April 18, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 20810]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9597]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PR99-257-006]


Williams Gas Pipelines Central, Inc.; Notice of Proposed Changes 
in FERC Gas Tariff

April 12, 2000.
    Take notice that on April 6, 2000, Williams Gas Pipelines Central 
Inc. (Williams) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Original Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to become effective 
November 1, 1999.

Substitute Second Revised Sheet No. 267.
Sheet No. 268

    On December 30, 1999, Williams filed revised tariff sheets and a 
Reconciliation and Refund report in the above-referenced dockets 
related to the settlement of all Gas Supply Realignment (GSR) cost 
issues. That filing is pending before the Commission. In that filing, 
Williams inadvertently deleted sections 14.4 and 14.5 of the General 
Terms and Conditions of its tariff. Those sections dealt with Stranded 
Investment and Exit Fees, respectively, and did not relate to GSR costs 
in any way. The instant filing proposes to reinstate these sections as 
sections 14.3 and 14.4 to be consistent with the numbering of preceding 
sections in Article 14. Williams is not proposing any changes in the 
language of these sections.
    Williams states that copies of the revised tariff sheets are being 
mailed to all parties on the Commission's official service list as well 
as to William's jurisdictional customers and interested state 
commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sec. 154.210 of the 
Commission's regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-222 for 
assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-9597 Filed 4-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
PROMISE OF A WARNING FROM THE BOARDING OFFICER

Written By YN3 Victor Anderson, YN3 Christopher Brown

The Coast Guard Hearing Office receives calls from mariners after they have 

received our letters making preliminary civil penalty (monetary) assessments 

against them for violations of marine safety regulations. In these calls, mariners 

often claim that the Boarding Officer issued a warning for the violations and 

advised that no civil penalty would be assessed. Other calls concern the 

Boarding Officer’s promise that a warning only will be issued concerning the 

violations if the mariner fixes the discrepancies and brings proof of compliance 

to the local Coast Guard unit.

Although well-intentioned, the Boarding Officer cannot foresee what action 

will ultimately take place concerning a noted violation. Generally, once a 

violation is noted, the potential for civil penalty action exists. There is one 

exception to this general rule, and that is when a written warning is issued in 

accordance with 33 CFR Subpart 1.08.

Boarding Officers do not issue “verbal” warnings. Nor should they make any 

“promise” that a warning will be issued at a later time or in lieu of civil penalty 

action. Hearing Officers do not automatically dismiss violations or issue a 

warning in every case where there is proof of compliance. If a written warning 

is issued in accordance with 33 CFR Subpart 1.08, then it should be 

documented as part of the boarding. This is the only type of warning that can be 

issued by the boarding officer. Please refer to our Newsletter articles 

concerning written warnings and mariners who show proof of compliance. (See

especially Vol: II, Sep 2008, “Written Warning v. Civil Penalty,” and Vol IV: 

Apr 2009, “Compliance.”)

Processing officials may recommend to the Hearing Officer that a warning be 

issued for a violation included in a civil penalty case. This should be clearly 

reflected on the Enforcement Summary and include the rationale and/or support 

for the recommendation under “Aggravating/Mitigating Factors.”
# FY 2020 Grant Recipients

## FY 2020 Citizenship and Assimilation Grant Program Award Recipients

In FY 2020, USCIS awarded nearly $10 million in grants to 39 organizations. The performance period is October 1, 2020 to September 30, 2022.

Content...

09/30/2020

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
Exhibit 12

             Calculation of (Deficiency) Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                 (in thousands)

<TABLE>
                                                     2002          2001            2000
                                                  ---------      ---------      ---------
<S>                                               <C>            <C>            <C>
EARNINGS
   Pretax loss ..............................     $  (3,018)     $  (2,005)     $    (948)
   Fixed charges ............................        34,916         34,666         27,445
   Capitalized interest .....................       (20,900)       (30,258)       (24,200)
   Amortization of capitalized interest .....           807             --             --
                                                  ---------      ---------      ---------
        Net total ...........................        11,805          2,403          2,297

FIXED CHARGES
   Interest expense .........................        13,163          3,592          2,599
   Capitalized interest .....................        20,900         30,258         24,200
   Other ....................................           853            816            646
                                                  ---------      ---------      ---------
        Total ...............................     $  34,916      $  34,666      $  27,445
                                                  =========      =========      =========
</TABLE>

The dollar amount of the deficiency of earnings to fixed charges for 2002,
2001, and 2000 (in thousands) was $23,111, $32,263, and $25,148, respectively.
(8 Misc. Rep. 366.)

#### STANTON v. SUPREME COUNCIL OF CATHOLIC MUT. BEN. ASS’N.

(Superior Court of Buffalo, General Term.

May, 1894.)

Case on Appeal—Remanding for Certificate.

Where a case on appeal is not certified as required by law, it will be sent back for a proper certificate.

Appeal from special term.

Action by Julia Stanton against the Supreme Council of the Catholic Mutual Benefit Association. From an order denying a motion for a stay of proceedings for nonpayment of the costs of a former action, defendant appeals.

Argued before HATCH and WHITE, JJ.

John J. Hynes, for appellant.

Thomas Sullivan, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

*No*certificate is attached to the appeal book showing that the notice of appeal and the papers presented to the court upon the motion contained therein are copies of such papers. This omission prevents a consideration of the order appealed from. Code Civ. Proc. § 1353; Lewisohn v. Niederwiesen, 40 Hun, 545; Guyon v. Rooney (Sup.) 6 N. Y. Supp. 99. Case is therefore sent back for proper certificate.

Case returned for proper certificate.
# C_2021423EN.01000201.xml

| 19.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 423/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 423/2

---

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/1693, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/1825, and Council Regulation (EU) 2016/1686 imposing additional restrictive measures directed against ISIL (Da’esh) and Al-Qaeda and natural and legal persons, entities or bodies associated with them

(2021/C 423/02)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons appearing in the Annex to Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/1693 (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/1825 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) 2016/1686 (3) imposing additional restrictive measures directed against ISIL (Da’esh) and Al-Qaeda and natural and legal persons, entities or bodies associated with them.

The Council of the European Union, after having reviewed the list of persons designated in the abovementioned Annexes, has determined that the restrictive measures provided for in Decision (CFSP) 2016/1693 and in Regulation (EU) 2016/1686 should continue to apply to those persons.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as listed in Annex II to Regulation (EU) 2016/1686 in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for essential needs or specific payments in accordance with Article 5 of that Regulation.

The persons concerned may submit a request to obtain the Council’s statement of reasons for including and maintaining them on the above-mentioned list. Any such request should be sent to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1.C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1.C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The persons concerned may at any time submit a request to the Council, together with any supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the list should be reconsidered, to the address provided above. In this regard, the attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the regular review by the Council of the list according to Article 6(2) of Decision (CFSP) 2016/1693 and Article 4(4) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1686. In order for requests to be considered at the next review, they should be submitted by 15 July 2022.

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 255, 21.9.2016, p. 25.

(2)  OJ L 369, 19.10.2021, p. 17.

(3)  OJ L 255, 21.9.2016, p. 1.

---
<PAGE>


                                   EXHIBIT 23
                         CONSENT OF EXPERTS AND COUNSEL

<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

                              Accountants' Consent

Board of Directors
CBES Bancorp, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (No.
333-39785) on Form S-8 of CBES Bancorp, Inc. of our report, dated August 2,
2002, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of CBES Bancorp, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of June 30, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income, and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2002,
which report appears in the June 30, 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of CBES
Bancorp, Inc.


/s/ KPMG LLP

Kansas City, Missouri
September 27, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND THE RELATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001043236
<NAME> ELDER TRUST
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,082
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   51,263
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,748
<PP&E>                                         182,076
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,753
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 267,893
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           78,621
<BONDS>                                         20,532
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            72
<OTHER-SE>                                     106,049
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   267,893
<SALES>                                         21,192
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,192
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,206
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,664<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,578
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (256)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (256)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,210<F2>
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,466)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.20)
<FN>
<F1>Includes $2.8 million recorded in connection with a separation agreement with an officer of the Company.
<F2>Loss on extinguishment of debt.
</FN>



</TABLE>
#               G-1055, Fee Schedule

**ALERT:** On Jan. 31, 2024, we published a final rule to adjust certain immigration and naturalization benefit request fees for the first time since 2016.

The new filing fees are effective for filings postmarked April 1, 2024, and later.

For more information, please visit our Frequently Asked Questions page.

Use this form to verify fee information for immigration forms.Each application, petition, or request must be accompanied by the correct fee(s) unless you are exempt from paying the fee(s) or are eligible for a fee waiver.  If the fee is incorrect, your application, petition, or request will be rejected.   

Edition Date

04/01/24. You can find the edition date at the bottom of the page of Form G-1055, Fee Schedule.

Downloads

USCIS Fee Schedule (PDF, 482.17 KB)

If you need help downloading and printing forms, read our instructions. 

## Form Details

04/01/24. You can find the edition date at the bottom of the page of Form G-1055, Fee Schedule.

Dates are listed in mm/dd/yy format.

If you complete and print this form to mail it, make sure that the form edition date and page numbers are visible at the bottom of all pages and that all pages are from the same form edition. If any of the form’s pages are missing or are from a different form edition, we may reject your form.

If you need help downloading and printing forms, read our instructions. 

## Select a Form for Fee Information

04/01/2024

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

I, Walter Thomas Price III, certify that (i) the Amended Annual Reports of Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-K/A for the periods ending
December 31, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005 fully comply with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Amended Annual Reports fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



/s/ Walter Thomas Price IIIWalter Thomas Price IIIManaging Member (Chief Executive Officer)Beeland Management Company, L.L.C.General Partner, Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P.February 5, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001002137
<NAME>                        SWISSRAY INTERNATIONAL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1
<CASH>                                     3,714,913
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                              2,789,829
<ALLOWANCES>                               202,942
<INVENTORY>                                6,546,931
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           13,555,320
<PP&E>                                     7,785,311
<DEPRECIATION>                             1,301,825
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             24,946,740
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      13,994,622
<BONDS>                                    15,473,934
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                                   206,120
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,047,920)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               24,946,740
<SALES>                                    6,957,028
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           6,957,028
<CGS>                                      5,332,562
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              5,332,562
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           10,304,079
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         4,168,310
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (12,827,434)
<INCOME-TAX>                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (12,827,434)
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                               (12,827,434)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (0.79)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (0.79)


</TABLE>