alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of MBT Financial Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John L. Skibski,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ John L. Skibski
------------------------------
John L. Skibski
Chief Financial Officer
March 15, 2004

                                       50
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the 

Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the 

Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound 

volumes go to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 18-BG-572

IN RE JOSEPH R. LAUMANN

A Member of the Bar of the

District of Columbia Court of Appeals DDN: 160-18

Bar Registration No. 471952

BEFORE: Glickman, Thompson, and Beckwith, Associate Judges. 

O R D E R

(FILED – August 2, 2018)

On consideration of the certified order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland 

indefinitely suspending respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction by 

consent; this court’s June 4, 2018, order directing respondent to show cause why 

the functionally-equivalent discipline of an indefinite suspension with a fitness

requirement, with the right to file for reinstatement after five years or after 

reinstatement by the state of Maryland, whichever occurs first, should not be 

imposed; and the statement of Disciplinary Counsel regarding reciprocal 

discipline; and it appearing that respondent failed to file a response to the court’s 

show cause order but filed his D.C. Bar R. XI, §14 (g) affidavit on June 29, 2018, 

it is

ORDERED that Joseph R. Laumann is hereby indefinitely suspended with a 

fitness requirement nunc pro tunc to June 29, 2018. He may file for reinstatement 

after five years or after reinstatement by the state of Maryland, whichever occurs 

first. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010); In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 

(D.C. 2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all 

cases in which the respondent does not participate).

PER CURIAM
# Formularios

Las tarifas de formularios, requisitos de elegibilidad, elegibilidad a exenciones de tarifas, documentos requeridos y direcciones de envío varían según el formulario y la razón por la cual presentará el formulario. Use esta sección para encontrar y descargar formularios, presentar una solicitud en línea, y aprender acerca de los requisitos de elegibilidad y presentación de solicitudes.

## Temas

Todos los Formularios

Presentación de Formularios En Línea

Información sobre Formularios

Tarifas de Presentación

Explorar mis Opciones

Formularios del Departamento de Estado y Otros Formularios que no son de USCIS

0 / 2000Para proteger su privacidad, por favor no incluya ninguna información personal en sus comentarios. Revise nuestra Política de Privacidad.
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual report of Global Realty Development Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Peter Voss, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.











Date:  May
      16, 2008
            By:/s/Peter VossPeter
      VossChief
      Executive Officer
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-22-00408-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 43rd District Court

Parker County, Texas

Trial Court No. CV21-1755

Before Kerr, Birdwell, and Bassel, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

KEVIN ALLISON, Appellant

V.

RANDAL POIRIER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS A DERIVATIVE PLAINTIFF ON 

BEHALF OF BAREHIDE RANCH, INC., Appellees
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have considered the “Joint Motion to Dismiss Appeal.” We grant the 

motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Each party must bear its own costs of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d), 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered: January 12, 2023
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5791 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to eliminate waivers to Buy America 

to strengthen the requirement that steel, iron, and manufactured goods 

used in a capital project are produced in the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 20, 2010 

Mr. GARAMENDI (for himself, Mr. HARE, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. KAGEN, Ms. 

KAPTUR, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. PERLMUTTER, Mr. 

SCHAUER, and Ms. SUTTON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to eliminate waivers 

to Buy America to strengthen the requirement that steel, 

iron, and manufactured goods used in a capital project 

are produced in the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Buses, Rail Cars, Fer5 ryboats: Make it in America Act of 2010’’. 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5791 IH

1 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF WAIVERS TO BUY AMERICA. 

2 Section 5323(j)(2) of title 49, United States Code, 

3 is amended by striking ‘‘that—’’ and all that follows 

4 through subparagraph (D) and inserting ‘‘that domestic 

5 material will increase the cost of the overall project by 

6 more than 25 percent.’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 23.1
 
 
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-134392, 333-143054, and 333-167888) and Forms S-3 (Nos. 333-130680 and 333-138244) of Sajan, Inc., Subsidiaries and Affiliate (River Valley Business Center, LLC) of our report datedMarch 30, 2011, relating to the financial statements, which appears on page 33 of this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
 
 
 /s/ BAKER TILLY VIRCHOW KRAUSE, LLP
 
 
 Minneapolis, Minnesota
 March 30, 2011
#### Merrill A. Young, Respondent, v Stratton Tompkins, Appellant.

Memorandum: It was an abuse of discretion for the court to excuse plaintiff’s failure to comply with defendant’s demand to file the note of issue (CPLR 3216). To defeat the motion, a party must show a "justifiable excuse for the delay and a good and meritorious cause of action” (CPLR 3216 [e]). Plaintiff failed to submit an affidavit of merits and counsel’s inability to locate his client for some two years does not constitute a justifiable excuse for the delay *(Highlands Ins. Co. v Maddena Constr. Co.,*109 AD2d 1071; *see also, Abrams, Kochman, Rathskeller v Esquire Motels,*79 AD2d 879). Under these circumstances, the motion to dismiss should have been granted *(Salch v Paratore,*60 NY2d 851; *Walker v Town of Lockport,*109 AD2d 1102, *affd*65 NY2d 840). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Rath, J. — dismiss complaint.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO\
                 13 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report of Enviro Voraxial Technology,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Alberto DiBella, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 13 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: January 31, 2008



/s/ Alberto DiBella
-------------------
Alberto DiBella
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
(October 13, 1987)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Dantzler, Also Known as Robert Dantzer, Appellant.

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Rose Rubin, J.), rendered on February 21, 1986, unanimously affirmed. The case is remitted to the Supreme Court, New York County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5). No opinion. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Sullivan, Milonas and Smith, JJ.
Exhibit 31.1

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14
              UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED
                 (SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

I, Noel J. Guillama , certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of The Quantum Group, Inc.
for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2004;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

         c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);

         a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls over financial reporting.

Date:   June 27, 2005

/s/ NOEL J. GUILLAMA
--------------------
NOEL J. GUILLAMA
President and Chief Executive Officer