alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5791 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5791

  To amend title 49, United States Code, to eliminate waivers to Buy 
      America to strengthen the requirement that steel, iron, and 
manufactured goods used in a capital project are produced in the United 
                                States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 20, 2010

   Mr. Garamendi (for himself, Mr. Hare, Mr. Hinchey, Mr. Kagen, Ms. 
 Kaptur, Mr. McDermott, Mrs. Napolitano, Mr. Perlmutter, Mr. Schauer, 
 and Ms. Sutton) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
           the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 49, United States Code, to eliminate waivers to Buy 
      America to strengthen the requirement that steel, iron, and 
manufactured goods used in a capital project are produced in the United 
                                States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Buses, Rail Cars, Ferryboats: Make 
it in America Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF WAIVERS TO BUY AMERICA.

    Section 5323(j)(2) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``that--'' and all that follows through subparagraph (D) and 
inserting ``that domestic material will increase the cost of the 
overall project by more than 25 percent.''.
                                 <all>
```
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Coast GuardU.S. Department of Homeland Security

Search
Search

Search

-  Home    -  News Room             
  -  Reserve             
  -  Forcecom             
  -  Operations             
  -  Mission Support             
  -  Atlantic Area             
  -  Pacific Area             
  -  History 
-  Units    -  Organization             
  -  Coast Guard A to Z             
  -  Atlantic Area             
  -  Pacific Area             
  -  Force Readiness Command 
-  Leadership    -  Commandant’s Initiatives             
  -  Senior Leadership             
  -  Deputy Commandant for Operations             
  -  Deputy Commandant for Mission Support             
  -  Atlantic Area Commander             
  -  Pacific Area Commander             
  -  Reserve             
  -  Auxiliary 
-  Resources    -  CG Support             
  -  Legal      -  JoinCGJAG             
    -  Legal_Assistance        -  Find-A-Legal-Assistance-Lawyer             
      -  FAQ 
  -  Civil Rights             
  -  Work-Life             
  -  Administrative Law Judges      -  Virtual Hearing 
  -  Newsroom             
  -  Family             
  -  Library             
  -  CG Web Mail             
  -  Return 2 Service      -  FAQ 
-  Community    -  Art Program             
  -  Girl Scouts / Boy Scouts      -  Eagle Scout Recognition 
  -  Coast Guard Band             
  -  Coast Guard Cities             
  -  Honor Guard             
  -  JROTC      -  NEWS 
  -  Special Programs      -  Industry Academy        -  Contacts             
      -  2018 
  -  Trademark             
  -  Resources      -  History             
    -  CGC Eagle 
-  Mariners    -  National Vessel Documentation Center             
  -  National Maritime Center             
  -  National Pollution Funds Center      -  NRD        -  NRD_FAQs             
      -  Trustee_Links             
      -  NRD_DOCS             
      -  About_NRD_Funding 
  -  Boating Safety 
-  doing business		 
-  Join		 
-  Recruiting		 
-  contact		 
-  About		 

HomeResourcesAdministrative Law JudgesDecisionsALJ Decisions 2004

**ALJ Decisions: 2004**

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

**

                      - FOIA
                      - Privacy Policy
                      - MHS Notice of Privacy Practices
                      - Accessibility
                      - No FEAR
                      - Whistleblower Protection
                      - U.S. Department of Homeland Security
                      - DHS Office of Inspector General
                      - WhiteHouse.gov
                      - USA.gov

### Stay Connected

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0507

_________________

BONNIE SHURTZ,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

DALTON GROVE PROPERTIES, LP,

 Defendant and Appellant.

ESTATE OF JOHN BILLMAYER, ESTATE

OF KATHRYN BILLMAYER, and all other

persons, unknown, claiming or who might

claim any right, title, estate, or interest in or

lien or encumbrance upon the real property

described in the complaint adverse to

plaintiffs ownership or any cloud upon

plaintiffs title, whether the claim or possible

claim is present or contingent,

 Defendants.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Deborah Kim Christopher, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 14 2021

04/14/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0507
#### George Cornelius *against*Anthony Ivins.

CERTIORARI.

An item in a plaintiff’s state of demand, or copy of his account, charging defendant “to loading vessel at his wharf, at Cedar Bush Landing,” may be considered as a charge for wharfage, and not a trespass.

A general charge “to sundries as per day book," if it stood alone, would be objectionable, but if on the same date there is a credit given the defendant for the same amount, and in the same language, the judgment will not be reversed for the generality of the charge.

If on the debit side of the account, there is a general charge for sundries, making the plaintiff’s demand exceed the sum of $100; yet'if on the credit side of the account there is a general credit given the defendant for the same sum in the same language, and if the same date which reduces the balance of plaintiff's demand under $100, the justice has jurisdiction of the cause.

*67This was a *certiorari,*to the Court of Common Pleas of Monmouth, brought by Cornelius the defendant, and appellant below to reverse a judgment, rendered against him, on an appeal from a justice’s court.

*Myall,*for the plantiff, in *certiorari,*relied upon the following reasons for the reversal of the judgment: *First,*because the state of demand, filed by the plaintiff be(low, exceeded the jurisdiction of the justice, and the credit therein given, was not such as is required by law. *Second,*because the state of demand is defective in this, that if comprises two different causes of action, to wit, debt and trespass.

In support of the first reason, he referred to the state of demand, whereby it appeared that the whole amount of the plaintiff’s demand, was $214.47; but in this sum was included, a charge undei; the date of June 20th, 1825, of “sundries per day book, $163.50, thereby reducing the balance due the plaintiff, under the sum of $100. This general credit, he contended, was insufficient to bring the cause within the jurisdiction of the justice. In support of the second reason, he referred to the two following items in the state of demand, *viz.:*“ To loading vessel at his wharf, Cedar Bush Landing,” and to “ sundries per day book.’’ The *first*item he contended was for trespass, and the *second*for a book debt, and that they could not be joined in the same action.

*Wall,*contra.

Cir. Justice.

If the charge of sundries, per day book, stood alone, it would be objectionable for its generality. But it appears, that ..there is a credit given the defendant for the same amount, in the same language, on the same date; and in as much as those two items taken together, clearly shew that there is no demand on this score, and that the one is extinguished by the other, we think we ought *68not to reverse the judgment on this ground. As to the objection that debt and trespass, are joined together, *we*think that the charge for “loading vessel at Cedar Bush Landing,” is not a trespass, but merely for the use of the wharf or wharfage — therefore ■ . ,

Let .the j udgment be affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32

Certification

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section
1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of FiberNet Telecom Group, Inc., (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |                              
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: November 8, 2007 |  | /s/ Jon A. DeLuca            
|                       |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                       | 
|Date: November 8, 2007 |  | /s/ Charles S. Wiesenhart Jr.
|                       |  | Chief Financial Officer      

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of MathStar, Inc.(the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2006 (the “Annual Report”), I,Douglas M. Pihl, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.     The AnnualReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

2.     The information contained in the AnnualReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| March  31, 2006 |   |   |                                   |
|-----------------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|            |   | By     | /s/ Douglas M. Pihl                    |
|            |   |   | Douglas M. Pihl                        |
|            |   |   | President and Chief Executive  Officer |
|                 |        |        |                                        |  |

 

----
Exhibit
23





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS





We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference into the Company's registration
statement on Form S-8, filed with the Commission on August 16, 2001, and the
Company's registration statement on Form S-8, filed with the Commission on May
30, 2003, of our report dated March 9, 2010 relating to the consolidated
financial statements of MBT Financial Corp. (the "Company") and management’s
report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which
reports are included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2009.





/s/ Plante & Moran,
PLLC


Auburn
Hills, Michigan


March 15,
2010
EXHIBIT 32.1


Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


The undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
ElderTrust (the Company), certifies that, to his knowledge, on the
date hereof:

(a) the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2003
filed on August 14, 2003 with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.


August 14, 2003                       /s/ D. Lee McCreary, Jr.
_______________                       ________________________________
Date                                  D. Lee McCreary, Jr.
                                      President, Chief Executive
                                      Officer, Chief Financial
                                      Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
AMERICAN SKIING COMPANY

                  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Skiing Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 1, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Helen
E. Wallace, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date:  June 15, 2005

                                       By:   /s/ Helen E. Wallace
                                       --------------------------
                                       Helen E. Wallace
                                       Senior Vice President, Chief
                                       Financial Officer
                                       (Principal Financial Officer)
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

November 7, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00231

- CV

IN RE ACCEPTANCE INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez , Justice Irene Rios , Justice This court’s opinion and order issued September 26, 2018. In our opinion and order, we ordered the trial court to: (1) vacate its order denying relator’s motion to compel appraisal and abate; (2) order the parties to enga g e in the appraisal process pursua nt to the terms of the appraisal clause; and (3) abate the litigation pending completion of the appraisal process. The trial court immediately complied with our order, rendering an order on September 26, 2018, vacating its prior order, ordering the partie s to engage in the appraisal process, and abating the matter until completion of the process. On October 16, 2018, the real parties in interest filed a motion asking the trial court to “stay the appraisal process until all appellate remedies are exhauste d and a final appellate order on whether an appraisal is required is rendered.” The trial court set a hearing on the motion for October 25, 2018. After the hearing, the trial court denied the motion for stay.

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2017CI14954 , styled Agrestic I, LP and Tiberius , LLC v. Acceptance Indemnity Insurance Company, Crawford & Company, and Danny Brown , pendin g in the 150th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Cathleen M. Stryker presiding.The day after the trial court denied their motion, the real parties in interest filed in this

court a “Motion to Stay the Appraisal Process.” In this motion, just as in the one filed in the trial court, the real parties in interest ask this court to stay the appraisal process until “all appellate remedies are exhausted and a final appellate order on whether appraisal is required in this case is

rendered.” We interpret this to mean that the real parties in interest request a stay until this court

has disposed of any motion for rehearing or motion for en banc reconsideration. Such motions , if any, are due in this court on October 31, 2018. After reviewing the motion to stay filed by the real parties in interest , we GRANT the “Motion to Stay the Appraisal Process” and ORDER the appraisal process stayed pending this court’s resolution of any motion for rehearing or motion for en banc reconsid eration filed by the real parties in interest or until further order of this court

.

It is so ORDERED on November 7, 2018

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE , Clerk of Court
#### Beal Savings Bank, Appellant, v Viola Sommer et al., as Trustees of a Trust under the Will of Sigmund Sommer, Respondents.

Submitted April 30, 2007;

decided June 5, 2007

Motion for reargument denied *[see 8*NY3d 318].

Judges Read and Jones taking no part.
Exhibit 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Annual  report  of  Global  Realty   Development
Corporation  (the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending  December 31,
2005 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Roger Davis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (3)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (4)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



Date:  May 12, 2006                                    By: /s/ Roger Davis
                                                       -------------------
                                                       Roger Davis
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Edward Kijania, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s application to withdraw granted *(see, People v Crawford,*71 AD2d 38). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Green, J.—burglary, third degree.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.
EXHIBIT 14

MEDINA COFFEE INC.

CODE OF ETHICS

This Code of Ethics replaces the previous Conflicts Guidelines adopted April
15, 2002, between Mr. Harry Miller and Medina Coffee. Inc.

I, Harry Miller, certify that as the President, Chief Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of Medina Coffee. Inc., I
adhere to and advocate the following principles and responsibilities governing
my professional and ethical conduct to:

1.
      
      act with honesty and
      integrity, avoiding actual or apparent conflicts of interest between
      personal and professional relationships.


2.
      
      proactively promote ethical
      behavior with all whom I come in contact with as an officer of Medina
      Coffee. Inc.


3.
      
      act in good faith,
      responsibly, with due care, competence and diligence, without
      misrepresenting material facts or allowing my judgment to be subordinated
      by others.


4.
      
      provide regulators, our
      accountants, legal counsel and other internal and external parties with
      information that is accurate, complete, objective, relevant, timely and
      understandable.


5.
      
      exercise responsible use of,
      and control over, all information, assets and resources employed or
      entrusted to me as an officer of Medina Coffee. Inc.


6.
      
      comply with rules and
      regulations of federal, state, and local governments, and appropriate
      private and public regulatory bodies.


7.
      
      to respect the confidentiality
      of information acquired in the course of my work, to not disclose such
      information except when authorized or otherwise legally obligated to do so
      and to not use such information for my personal advantage.


9.
      
      ensure that directions
      provided to our accountants, legal counsel and other third party providers
      are clear and our compliance expectations of ethical behavior understood.


10.
      
      proactively communicate
      compliance standards and procedures to any current or future employees.


I agree to report to Medina Coffee. Inc. and all other applicable parties
including regulators of any failure on my part to adhere to this Code of
Conduct. I fully understand that violation of this code may lead to penalties to
myself personally and to Medina Coffee. Inc.

s/ Harry Miller
      ______________________________
      
      Date for reference:
      April 15, 2002Harry Miller
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

I, Allen Goodman, certify that (i) the Annual Report of Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.



/s/ Allen GoodmanAllen GoodmanManaging Member (Chief Financial and Principal Accounting Officer)Beeland Management Company, L.L.C.General Partner, Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P.March 30, 2010
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sonic Automotive, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, O. Bruton Smith, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ O. BRUTON
SMITHO. Bruton Smith Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer


March 5, 2012
#### COSTELLO, Appellant, v. NEW YORK, O. & W. RY. CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department.

May 18, 1894.)

Action by Ellen Costello, as administratrix, etc., against the New York, Ontario & Western Railway Company.

Argued before HARDIN, P. J., and MARTIN and MERWIN, JJ.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.