alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**


**O2DIESEL
      CORPORATION**


**(A
      Development Stage Company)**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT**


**TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Annual Report of O2Diesel Corporation (the "Company") on
      Form 10-KSB/A (Amendment No. 2) for the year ended December 31, 2007,
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), I, Alan Rae, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, David
      H.
      Shipman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:





*1.*
            The
                Report on Form 10-KSB/A (Amendment No. 2) fully complies with the
                requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
                Act of 1934; and





*2.*
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





This
      certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company with the
      requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not
      be disclosed, distributed or used by any person or for any reason other than
      as
      specifically required by law.





Date:
      September 24, 2008


/s/  ALAN
                RAE
              
              Alan
                Rae
              Chief
                Executive Officer
            
            /s/  DAVID
                H. SHIPMAN
              
              David
                H. Shipman
              Chief
                Financial Officer
# C_2021400EN.01000301.xml

| 4.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 400/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 400/3

---

Special report No 19/2021

Europol support to fight migrant smuggling: a valued partner, but insufficient use of data sources and result measurement

(2021/C 400/03)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that special report No 19/2021 ‘Europol support to fight migrant smuggling: a valued partner, but insufficient use of data sources and result measurement’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 24, 2015

p1116 

# Order

Clerk November 24, 2015

150855

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 150855

COA: 323572

Wayne CC: 78

- 813217

- FM

JAMES R. THOMAS

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 25, 2014

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, bec ause the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
### RECEIVEDIN 

## ibJ/S- COURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS, M»252in5 

## /io'/i) >flflc &o/j f l/aw /Jd/r/je /o ££^^sf sfaj* /?sx/j//?je£ /?a//) /*//// /o#£/?//</ /fofi/ezcs/p/f /?// AA/?r '///}£/ /?££• /?dA A> sAc A) A^/a As/At /A/if /?7///AyZ 

## A, /)/j/ous//'9/999 _X: '/jar Ji/irf. osj &jjsJ? •///*££*j A

—- - — *•—•—;—— — • •••'. y—— • •-,••—,, t . . , 

### f?om /)s/}7fA^ fr s?J £i/)/)s.Aj///?£f //£#*./j£. 

## Ihi JxabsnA^ 2/J99? a /?M?s A)ax J/Tm/ /q fl/s/rU/ f.ltrlt. t ILmQ/IJ /n/ZfiFsA ? Of S/j*/-A/7»*/Jn A f/Z.QJ22 A. 

# H/rh/i/?rJ /'.. Ijk/jjtL />f /!r//r>,:f»/, /}p0to/<f Ee^mA^l

Jmu-xerip^ from -Ml Ajdusf* /$\/99f £/j//*//•*////?/&/ A fififi.ikJ^ 

## _Z QJnn/r/ ///& A ji/neJ If M/* A/)Lf&A £Of/L 

# fiffhi/fd Mf: _7s/>&*&-//>& AAaA /or/l-r ££fc/s$Ad / 

# fjurl /fSo^ //olJ A/ X On /)Aoa/ Qs/A/i/f /) /°o/s/ /if /fa A/)aa<cs//>/<? //?#/ AA/tr tfoo/z/ ££c/£dfc// /V,J fh/m/,/• Q*/A\^ hay/- Afr.t. fV>wA>/f A/ztfjJ /?«/o/ Am.) for /77/SS/J-fi 7s**j.trsl/)/i' fort '/A/f /6u/r/f*J/&?/?(/ 

## na/MikiQ So //?/)/ 7 /r//i/Y froj2£rS// A^/3ts.^jr /cyZ, /nS f/1/frjL^ ou/d lArts A/&9J& '/jCojAhiA /7-7& tu/fA 6l<ut/ /cjfo/yty^fstn,/! 

### foJdS'rxr/^f /A<t /r/94jfC/-&>7&-< /7<Jd AocJ U& &9-*J rJ/hfo 4 Ta/<J 

### '*kf 

## /I &/)* df /jAoA j&u dzsjeuec/ 6A A?e ts£/J?/<**./ 

# Cou£fjf Ma^/n/rA

,// 

## 7 /-ja/j/J &,?/*/97%f tfMseseMA )r<

C^undtf iuif : C^£f£. Q/ZooJfd' 8W fir? &3Z //^i-Ja Zc 78lf9.(Page 125 of 412)

' \

MICHAEL J. MCCORMICK

PRESIDING JUDGE
LAWRENCE E. MEYERS STEPHEN W. MANSFIELD SHARON KELLER TOM PRICE SUE HOLLAND PAUL WOMACK CHERYLJOHNSON MIKEKEASLGR

JUDGES 

### Court ai Criminal JVppegls J&iate of tEexas Pnx 12308 (fltxpitol JStaiiott

(Auatttt 78711 May 10,2000 TROY C. BENNETT, JR. CLERK 312463-1531 RICHARD E. WETZEL EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR 313463-1000

Reagan E. Greer District Clerk 100 Dolorosa, #362 San Antonio, Texas 78205-3028 Re: Ex parte Carl L. Brooks YourNo.96-CR-0292-Wl

Dear Mr. Greer. On September21,1999,this Court received thereporter's record from an evidentiary hearing held on Mr. Brooks' Art. 11.071, V.A.C.C.P., habeas corpus application. The Courthas not yet received the transcript containing the pleadings in the case. Please advise the Court when you intend to forward those matters set out under Art. 11.071, Sec. 9, V.A.C.C.P. Among otherthings, the Courthas not been supplied with the_application,.the 

### 3jttate^sjnswgrorthetrialcourt'sFindingsof FactandConclusionsof Law. Suchmatters should be forwarded as soon as possible. Thank you for your attention and cooperation in this matter. Sincerely,

REW/bh Richard E. Wetzel General Counsel

Supreme Court Building. 20I West 14th stbegt, room toe. Austin, tbaas 78701 WEBSITE WWW.CCA.COURTS.STATE.Tir.US
#### NICKERSON, Appellant, v. NIVER, Respondent.

(Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.

May 10, 1894.)

Action by Lulah Nickerson against Norman H. Niver.

Argued before DALY, C. J., and BOOKSTAVER and PRYOR, JJ.

P. P. Stafford, for appellant.

Boothby & Warren, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with costs.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2022-2415

_____________________________

GRESKOVICH & BALCOM, D.D.S.,

P.A.,

Appellant,

v.

AARON WALLENDER, D.D.S.,

M.D.,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Thomas Williams, Judge.

February 16, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, TANENBAUM, and LONG, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Daniel E. Harrell of Clark Partington, Pensacola, for Appellant.

T. A. Borowski, Jr. and Darryl Steve Traylor, Jr. of Borowski & 

Traylor, P.A., Pensacola, for Appellee.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Augustine R. Rizzo, Appellant.

Submitted March 19, 2007;

decided March 22, 2007

Motion for an extension of the time within which to apply for permission to appeal pursuant to CPL 460.20 granted and motion papers treated as a timely CPL 460.20 application.

Judge Pigott taking no part.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       4,877,763
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,455,391
<ALLOWANCES>                                    23,635
<INVENTORY>                                  1,143,857
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,693,658
<PP&E>                                      31,690,609
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,215,462
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              38,471,915
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,775,891
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        82,099
<OTHER-SE>                                  34,987,593
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                38,471,915
<SALES>                                      5,849,181
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,208,948
<CGS>                                        4,757,583
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,914,773
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                84,485
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                23,635
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (981,107)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   345,779
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (635,328)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (635,328)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>            5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Statement of Consolidated Income of Solutia Inc. and Subsidiaries for
the six months ended June 30, 1999, and the Statement of Consolidated
Financial Position as of June 30, 1999. Such information is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such combined financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>         1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                              15
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      443
<ALLOWANCES>                                         7
<INVENTORY>                                        368
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,050
<PP&E>                                           3,426
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,390
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,024
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              927
<BONDS>                                            597
<COMMON>                                             1
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                          19
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,024
<SALES>                                          1,363
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,363
<CGS>                                            1,065
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,065
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (19)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    139
<INCOME-TAX>                                        45
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 94
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        94
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.81


</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1

                  Letterhead of Schwartz Levitsky Feldman llp




                CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


The undersigned,  Schwartz Levitsky Feldman llp,  Chartered  Accountants  hereby
consents to the use of our name and use of our report of Independent  Registered
Public  Accounting  Firm dated  December 28, 2005 except for notes 20 a), b), c)
and 21 as to which the date is January  12,  2006 and note 20 d) as to which the
date is January 30, 2006 for China BAK Battery, Inc. as filed with Amendment No.
1 to the Registration on Form 10-KSB being filed by the Company.

                                               "SCHWARTZ LEVITSKY FELDMAN LLP"

Toronto, Ontario, Canada                       /s/ Schwartz Levitsky Feldman llp
January 30, 2006                               Chartered Accountants
386 P.2d 851

#### STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Gordon Lee WOODRING, Appellant.

No. 1340.

Supreme Court of Arizona. In Division.

Nov. 20, 1963.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 17, 1963.

*85Sullivan & Glenn, Phoenix, for appellant.

Robert W. Pickrell, Atty. Gen., Phillip M. Haggerty, Asst. Atty. Gen., Charles N. Ronan, County Atty., for appellee.

BERNSTEIN, Chief Justice.

Defendant was charged with and convicted of the crime of burglary in the first degree. At the outset of the trial defend•ant pleaded not guilty and also entered a plea of double jeopardy, based on a previous trial on the same charge in which the jury had been discharged for failure to reach a verdict. The trial judge refused to ¡submit defendant’s plea of double jeopardy -to the jury. Defendant appeals contending that the failure to present his plea of ■ double jeopardy to the jury constituted a -violation of A.R.S. § 13-1592.

Defendant argues that an unnecessary discharge of the jury, once sworn and impaneled, operates as an acquittal of the •defendant in a criminal case. State ex rel. Williams v. Grayson, 90 So.2d 710, 63 A.L. R.2d 777 (Fla. 1956), Anno. 63 A.L.R.2d 782. Defendant relies on A.R.S. § 13-1592 which requires the trial judge to submit a question of fact arising upon a plea of double jeopardy to the jury. A.R.S. § 13-1592 does not, however, require a finding by the jury in every case in which a plea of double jeopardy is interjected. If the previous prosecution could not constitute double jeopardy as a matter of law, the trial court may so rule without presenting the plea to the trier of fact. People v. Greer, 30 Cal. 2d 589, 184 P.2d 512.

In the instant case the plea of double jeopardy did not present a question of fact. In the first trial the jury deliberated both before and after lunch, and at 4:55 p. m. the foreman stated to the judge that they were unable to reach a verdict. When asked whether they thought they could ultimately agree, the record shows they indicated by shaking their heads that they could not. The trial judge has authority to declare a mistrial and discharge the jury when “[u]pon expiration of such time as the court deems proper it appears that there is no reasonable probability that the jurors can agree upon a verdict.” Rules of Criminal Procedure 302(A) (3), 17 A.R.S. In such a case the defendant is not entitled to plead double jeopardy on his subsequent prosecution. People v. Greer, supra. Under such circumstances jeopardy does not attach and “there is no limit to the *86number of trials but the discretion of the court.” Morgan v. State, 28 Ariz. 363, 236 P. 1112. Where the jury disagree and are discharged by the court, then the status of the case is the same as though there had been no trial at all, unless the trial court has abused its discretion in denying the plea. People v. Crooms, 66 Cal.App.2d 491, 152 P.2d 533.

The trial judge ruled correctly in refusing to submit defendant’s plea of double jeopardy to the jury.

The judgment is affirmed.

UDALL, V. C. J., and LOCKWOOD, J., concurring.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Adrian Dwayne MOSLEY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-41115

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 21, 2011.

Michelle Suzanne Englade, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Beaumont, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Margaret Loraine Schmucker, Austin, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Adrian Dwayne Mosley, Beaumont, TX, pro se.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and STEWART and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

*445PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Adrian Dwayne Mosley has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Mosley has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### Ronald K. Jones et al., Respondents, v John Dillon, Individually and as Sheriff of Onondaga County, et al., Defendants, and Freeman Bucktooth, Jr., et al., Appellants.

Present —Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Denman, Boomer and Schnepp, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 74 (Monday, April 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 20489]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9520]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[NAFTA-03730]


Timbergon, Redmond, Oregon; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 250 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on February 17, 2000 on behalf of workers at Timbergon, 
Redmond, Oregon.
    The petitioner requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no 
purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, D.C. this 6th day of April 2000.
Grant D. Beale,
Program Manager, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-9520 Filed 4-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-19-00282-CR

Carlos GARCIA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 7, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 548885

Honorable Michael De Leon, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE RIOS, AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED. The trial court clerk is ORDERED not to assess any court-appointed attorney’s fees 

against appellant, and the clerk of this court is DIRECTED to provide a copy of this court’s opinion 

and judgment to the trial court clerk. Appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED

SIGNED December 4, 2019.

_____________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of OAO Technology Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”), pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterended June 30, 2003 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|                                   |   |      |                                                                               |
|----------------------------------------|--------|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:   August 13, 2003 |   | By:  | /s/ CHARLES A. LEADER                                                              |
|                                   |   |      |                                                                                    |
|                                   |   |      | **Charles A. Leader****President and Chief Executive Officer**                     |
|                                   |   |      |                                                                               |
|                                   |   | By:  | /s/ J. JEFFREY FOX                                                                 |
|                                   |   |      |                                                                                    |
|                                   |   |      | **J. Jeffrey Fox****Senior Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer** |

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to OAO Technology Solutions, Inc. and will be retained by OAO Technology Solutions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanced Engine Technologies, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Carroll Shelby, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                    
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|Date:  November 19, 2002 | /s/  CARROLL SHELBY       | 
|------------------------ | ------------------------- | 
|                         |                           | 
|                         | Carroll Shelby, President |