50050 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 7, 2021 / Notices 

18For a full discussion of this clarification, see 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 

(May 6, 2003). 19See Order, 82 FR at 40138. 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review. For entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR produced 

by each respondent for which it did not 

know its merchandise was destined for 

the United States, we will instruct CBP 

to liquidate such entries at the all-others 

rate if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company(ies) involved in 

the transaction.18 Where either the 

individually-selected respondent’s 

weighted-average dumping margin is 

zero or de minimis, or an importerspecific assessment rate is zero or de 

minimis, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

For the companies which were not 

selected for individual review, we 

intend to assign an assessment rate 

based on the methodology described in 

the ‘‘Rates for Non-Examined 

Companies’’ section. The final results of 

this review shall be the basis for the 

assessment of antidumping duties on 

entries of merchandise covered by this 

review where applicable. 

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit requirements 

will be effective upon publication of the 

notice of final results of administrative 

review for all shipments of the subject 

merchandise entered, or withdrawn 

from warehouse, for consumption on or 

after the publication date, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

The cash deposit rate for the companies 

under review will be the rate 

established in the final results of this 

review, except if the rate is de minimis 

within the meaning of 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(1) (i.e., less than 0.50 

percent), in which case the cash deposit 

rate will be zero; (2) for merchandise 

exported by manufacturers or exporters 

not covered in this review but covered 

in a prior segment of the proceeding, the 

cash deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published for the 

most recently completed segment; (3) if 

the exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review, a prior review, or the original 

investigation, but the manufacturer is, 

the cash deposit rate will be the rate 

established for the most recently 

completed segment for the manufacturer 

of the merchandise; and (4) the cash 

deposit rate for all other manufacturers 

or exporters will continue to be 8.91 

percent, the all-others rate established 

in the less-than-fair-value 

investigation.19 These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: August 31, 2021. 

James Maeder, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Rates for Non-Examined Companies 

V. Discussion of the Methodology 

VI. Recommendation 

Appendix II 

Companies Not Selected for Individual 

Examination 

Adinath International 

Aditya Forge Limited 

Allena Group 

Alloyed Steel 

Balkrishna Steel Forge Pvt. Ltd. 

Bebitz Flanges Works Private Limited 

C.D. Industries 

CHW Forge 

CHW Forge Pvt. Ltd 

Citizen Metal Depot 

Corum Flange 

DN Forge Industries 

Echjay Forgings Limited 

Falcon Valves and Flanges Private Limited 

Heubach International 

Hindon Forge Pvt. Ltd. 

Jai Auto Pvt. Ltd. 

Kinnari Steel Corporation 

Mascot Metal Manufacturers 

M F Rings and Bearing Races Ltd. 

Munish Forge Private Limited 

OM Exports 

Punjab Steel Works 

Raaj Sagar Steels 

Ravi Ratan Metal Industries 

R. D. Forge 

Rolex Fittings India Pvt. Ltd. 

Rollwell Forge Engineering Components and 

Flanges 

Rollwell Forge Pvt. Ltd. 

SHM (ShinHeung Machinery) 

Siddhagiri Metal & Tubes 

Sizer India 

Steel Shape India 

Sudhir Forgings Pvt. Ltd. 

Tirupati Forge Pvt. Ltd. 

Umashanker Khandelwal Forging Limited 

[FR Doc. 2021–19256 Filed 9–3–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–904] 

Certain Activated Carbon From the 

People’s Republic of China: Notice of 

Initiation and Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Changed 

Circumstances Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) is initiating a changed 

circumstances review (CCR) of the 

antidumping duty (AD) order on certain 

activated carbon (activated carbon) from 

the People’s Republic of China (China). 

Further, Commerce preliminarily 

determines that Jacobi Carbons AB 

(Jacobi AB) and its affiliates, Tianjin 

Jacobi International Trading Co. Ltd. 

(Tianjin Jacobi) and Jacobi Carbons 

Industry (Tianjin) Co. Ltd. (JCC) 

(collectively, Jacobi), should be 

collapsed with its new wholly-owned 

Chinese affiliate, Jacobi Adsorbent 

Materials (JAM), and the single entity, 

inclusive of JAM, should be assigned 

the same AD cash deposit rate assigned 

to Jacobi for purposes of determining 

AD liability in this proceeding. 

Interested parties are invited to 

comment on these preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable September 7, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Josh 

Simonidis or Jinny Ahn, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–0608 or (202) 482–0339, 

respectively. 


sradovich on DSKJLST7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 7, 2021 / Notices 50051 

1See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: Certain 

Activated Carbon from the People’s Republic of 

China, 72 FR 20988 (April 27, 2007) (Order). 

2 Id. 

3See Certain Activated Carbon from the People’s 

Republic of China: Final Results and Partial 

Rescission of the Third Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, 76 FR 67142 (October 31, 

2011). 

4See Certain Activated Carbon from the People’s 

Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review, Final Determination of 

No Shipments, and Final Rescission of 

Administrative Review, in Part; 2018–2019, 86 FR 

10539 (February 22, 2021). 

5See Jacobi’s Letter, ‘‘Jacobi’s Request for 

Changed Circumstances Review,’’ dated July 26, 

2021. 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Initiation and Preliminary Results of the 

Changed Circumstances Review of the 

Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Activated 

Carbon from the People’s Republic of China,’’ dated 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 

notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 

7See 19 CFR 351.216(d). 

8See 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3)(ii); see also, e.g., 

Notice of Initiation and Preliminary Results of 

Changed Circumstances Reviews: Certain Passenger 

Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from the People’s 

Republic of China, 85 FR 5193 (January 29, 2020), 

unchanged in Certain Passenger Vehicle and Light 

Truck Tires from the People’s Republic of China: 

Final Results of Changed Circumstances Reviews, 

85 FR 14638 (March 13, 2020). 

9Commerce is exercising its discretion under 19 

CFR 351.310(c) to alter the time limit for requesting 

a hearing. 

10Commerce is exercising its discretion under 19 

CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii) to alter the time limit for the 

filing of case briefs. 

11See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD 

Service Requirements Due to COVID–19, 85 FR 

17006, 17007 (March 26, 2020). 

12See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2). 

13See 19 CFR 351.303(b). 

14See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD 

Service Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension 

of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On April 27, 2007, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register an AD 

order on activated carbon from China.1

In the original investigation, we selected 

Jacobi AB as a mandatory respondent 

which qualified for a separate rate.2 In 

the third administrative review, 

Commerce determined that Jacobi AB 

and its two Chinese subsidiaries, JCC 

and Tianjin Jacobi, should be treated as 

a single entity (collectively, Jacobi) and 

assigned a single cash deposit rate.3 In 

the most recently completed 

administrative review covering the 

period April 1, 2018, through March 31, 

2019, we assigned Jacobi a separate rate, 

as a non-individually examined 

exporter under review.4

On July 26, 2021, Jacobi requested 

that Commerce conduct a CCR of the 

Order to confirm that Jacobi AB and its 

two affiliated firms, Tianjin Jacobi and 

JCC, with the addition of its new 

wholly-owned subsidiary, JAM, is the 

successor-in-interest to Jacobi.5 Given 

the circumstances and evidence 

submitted by Jacobi, Commerce finds it 

more appropriate to instead evaluate 

Jacobi’s CCR request through a 

collapsing analysis. No interested 

parties filed comments opposing the 

CCR request. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the 

scope of this Order is activated carbon. 

For a complete description of the scope 

of the Order, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum.6

Methodology 

We are conducting this CCR in 

accordance with section 751(b)(1) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 

For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 

conclusions, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. 

Initiation and Preliminary Results of 

CCR 

Pursuant to section 751(b)(1) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.216, Commerce 

will conduct a CCR upon receipt of 

information concerning, or a request 

from an interested party for a review of, 

an AD order which shows changed 

circumstances sufficient to warrant a 

review of the order. The information 

submitted by Jacobi supports its claim 

that JAM should be treated as part of the 

Jacobi entity and demonstrates changed 

circumstances sufficient to warrant such 

a review.7 Therefore, in accordance with 

751(b)(1)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.216(d), we are initiating a CCR 

based on the information contained in 

the CCR request. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3)(ii), 

Commerce can combine the notice of 

initiation of a CCR and the notice of the 

preliminary results of a CCR into a 

single notice if Commerce concludes 

that expedited action is warranted. In 

this instance, because the record 

contains the information necessary to 

make a preliminary finding, we find that 

expedited action is warranted and have 

combined the notice of initiation and 

the notice of preliminary results.8

We preliminarily determine that 

Jacobi and JAM are affiliated and should 

be collapsed as a single entity. 

Specifically, we find that JAM is 

directly controlled by Jacobi, thereby 

meeting the affiliation criteria, in 

accordance with sections 771(33)(E) and 

(F) of the Act. In addition, we 

preliminarily find that the criteria of 19 

CFR 351.401(f) are met and, thus, Jacobi 

and JAM should be treated as a single 

entity. A list of topics discussed in the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

appears in the Appendix to this notice. 

Should our final results remain 

unchanged from these preliminary 

results, we will instruct U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection to assign entries 

of subject merchandise exported by JAM 

the AD cash deposit rate applicable to 

Jacobi (i.e., $0.65/kg). Commerce will 

issue its final results of the review in 

accordance with the time limits set forth 

in 19 CFR 351.216(e). 

Public Comment 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), any 

interested party may request a hearing 

within 14 days of publication of this 

notice.9 In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.309(c)(1)(ii), interested parties may 

submit case briefs not later than 14 days 

after the date of publication of this 

notice.10 Rebuttal briefs, limited to 

issues raised in the case briefs, may be 

filed no later than seven days after the 

case briefs, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.309(d).11 Parties who submit case or 

rebuttal briefs are encouraged to submit 

with each argument: (1) A statement of 

the issue; (2) a brief summary of the 

argument; and (3) a table of 

authorities.12 All comments are to be 

filed electronically using Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS) 

available to registered users at https://

access.trade.gov, and must also be 

served on interested parties. An 

electronically filed document must be 

received successfully in its entirety by 

ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on 

the day it is due.13 Note that Commerce 

has temporarily modified certain 

requirements for serving documents 

containing business proprietary 

information, until further notice.14

Consistent with 19 CFR 351.216(e), 

Commerce will issue the final results of 

this CCR no later than 270 days after the 

date on which this review was initiated, 

or within 45 days of publication of these 

preliminary results, if all parties agree to 

our preliminary finding. 

This notice is published in 

accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and 

777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.216(b) 

and 351.221(c)(3)(ii). 

Dated: September 1, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Initiation and Preliminary Results of the 


sradovich on DSKJLST7X2PROD with NOTICES
50052 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 7, 2021 / Notices 

1See Ripe Olives from Spain: Antidumping Duty 

Order, 83 FR 37465 (August 1, 2018) (Order); see 

also Ripe Olives from Spain: Notice of Correction 

to Antidumping Duty Order, 83 FR 39691 (August 

10, 2018) (Order). 

2See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 

63081 (October 6, 2020). 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Ripe Olives from Spain: 

Respondent Selection,’’ dated November 23, 2020. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Ripe Olives from Spain: 

Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019– 

2020,’’ dated April 5, 2021. 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Ripe Olives from Spain: 

Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019– 

2020,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum). 

6For more information regarding the calculation 

of this margin, see Memorandum, ‘‘Ripe Olives 

from Spain: Calculation of the Preliminary Margin 

for Respondents Not Selected for Individual 

Examination,’’ dated concurrently with this notice. 

As the weighting factor, we relied on the publicly 

ranged sales data reported in the quantity and value 

charts submitted by Angel Camacho and Agro 

Sevilla. 

7See 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Changed Circumstances Review 

V. Methodology 

A. Affiliation 

B. Collapsing 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–19369 Filed 9–3–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–469–817] 

Ripe Olives From Spain: Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2019–2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily finds that 

producers or exporters subject to this 

administrative review made sales of 

subject merchandise at less than normal 

value during the period of review (POR), 

August 1, 2019, through July 31, 2020. 

We invite interested parties to comment 

on these preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable September 7, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jacob Keller or Christopher Williams, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office I, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4849 or 

(202) 482–5166, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 1, 2018, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register the 

antidumping duty order on ripe olives 

from Spain.1 On October 6, 2020, 

Commerce initiated the administrative 

review of the Order for the period of 

August 1, 2019, to July 31, 2020.2 On 

November 23, 2020, Commerce selected 

Angel Camacho Alimentacion, S.L. 

(Angel Camacho) and Agro Sevilla 

Aceitunas S.Coop. Andalusia (Agro 

Sevilla) as the mandatory respondents 

in the administrative review.3 On April 

5, 2021, Commerce extended the 

deadline for issuance of the preliminary 

results of this review by 120 days, until 

August 31, 2021, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.213(h)(2).4

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the Order 

are ripe olives. For a complete 

description of the scope of this Order, 

see the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum.5

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751(a)(2) of 

the Act. Export price and constructed 

export price are calculated in 

accordance with section 772 of the Act. 

Normal value is calculated in 

accordance with section 773 of the Act. 

For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 

conclusions, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. The 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is made available 

to the public via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum can be found at 

http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/ 

index.html. A list of the topics 

discussed in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum is attached as an 

appendix to this notice. 

Rates for Non-Examined Companies 

The statute and Commerce’s 

regulations do not address the 

establishment of a rate to be applied to 

companies not selected for examination 

when Commerce limits its examination 

in an administrative review pursuant to 

section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, 

Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of 

the Act, which provides instructions for 

calculating the all-others rate in a 

market economy investigation, for 

guidance when calculating the rate for 

companies which were not selected for 

individual examination in an 

administrative review. Under section 

735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others 

rate is normally ‘‘an amount equal to the 

weighted average of the estimated 

weighted-average dumping margins 

established for exporters and producers 

individually investigated, excluding any 

zero or de minimis margins, and any 

margins determined entirely {on the 

basis of facts available}.’’ In this review, 

we preliminarily calculated weightedaverage dumping margins for the two 

mandatory respondents, Angel Camacho 

and Agro Sevilla, that are not zero, de 

minimis, or determined entirely on the 

basis of facts available. Accordingly, 

Commerce preliminarily assigned to the 

companies not individually examined, 

listed in the chart below, a margin of 

2.75 percent which is the weighted 

average of Angel Camacho’s and Agro 

Sevilla’s calculated weighted-average 

margins.6

Preliminary Results of Review 

We preliminarily determine that the 

following weighted-average dumping 

margins exist for the period August 1, 

2019, through July 31, 2020: 

Producer/exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Agro Sevilla Aceitunas S.COOP 

Andalusia ................................ 1.48 

Angel Camacho Alimentacion 

S.L ........................................... 4.31 

Review-Specific Weighted-Average 

Rate Applicable to the Following 

Companies: 

Producer/exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Aceitunas Guadalquivir, S.L ....... 2.75 

Alimentary Group Dcoop S. 

Coop. And ............................... 2.75 

Internacional Olivarera, S.A ....... 2.75 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed to parties within five days 

after public announcement of the 

preliminary results.7 Pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.309(c), interested parties may 

submit case briefs no later than 30 days 

after the date of publication of this 

notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues 

raised in the case briefs, may be filed 

not later than seven days after the date 


sradovich on DSKJLST7X2PROD with NOTICES