alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Benefits

At USCIS we put our employees first, offering a wide array of benefits and workplace flexibilities to help ensure our employees’ wellbeing.

                    - We follow the  General Schedule  pay scale.
                    - For qualifying (hard to fill) positions, we may offer tuition repayment assistance, recruitment, relocation, and retention incentives.

                    - 11 paid holidays each year.
                    - Up to 13 days of sick leave annually.
                    - Up to 26 days of  annual leave .
                    - Flexible  or compressed work schedules may be available.

                    - Choose from the widest selection of  health plans  in the country.
                    - Supplemental dental and vision  benefits are available if you want additional coverage.
                    - Flexible spending accounts  for dependent and health care expenses.
                    - Long-term care insurance  is available.

                    - Automatic, low-cost policy.
                    - Other  options  to increase your coverage.

                    - Transit subsidy available in some areas to encourage employees to use public transportation.
                    - Reduced or no-cost parking available at some USCIS locations.

                    - Free, confidential counseling services available 24/7 for you and your family.
                    - Free referrals for child care searches, elder care evaluations, financial planning, legal assistance, discounts on goods and services, and more.
                    - Backup care when your normal dependent care is unavailable on a day you are supposed to work.
                    - Some offices allow employees to  telework .

                    - Three-part retirement system including the  Federal Employees Retirement System ,  Social Security  and the  Thrift Savings Plan , similar to a 401(k), with agency-matching contributions.

09/23/2022

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 32(a)


  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jeffry N. Quinn, Chief Executive Officer of Solutia Inc. (the "Company"),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
                  quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 (the "Report") fully
                  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results
                  of operations of the Company.

Date: August 3, 2007

                                                    /s/ Jeffry N. Quinn
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                                     Jeffry N. Quinn
                                         President, Chief Executive Officer and
                                                  Chairman of the Board

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Solutia Inc. and will
be retained by Solutia Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
#### *In re*Neale’s Estate.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.*

July 18, 1890.)

Legacy Tax—Exemption—Almshouse.

Under Rev. St. N. "Y. (7th Ed.) p. 983, § 4, subd. 4, providing that every “almshouse, ” and “the real and personal property” “belonging to or connected with the same, ” and used for the purposes thereof, shall be exempt from taxation, a legacy to such an institution is not subject to the succession tax provided for in Laws N. *Y.*1887, e. 718, i 1, since that act excepts “societies, corporations, and institutions now exempted by law from taxation. ”

Appeal from surrogate’s court, Kings county.

The Faith Home for Incurables is an incorporated benevolent and charitable society, whose object is to maintain respectable homeless persons, afflicted with incurable disease. It is maintained entirely by charity, and its inmates are people without home; money, or friends able to support them. Rev. St. N. Y. (7th Ed.) p. 982, § 4, subd. 4, provides that “every poorhouse, almshouse, house of industry, ** * **and the real and personal property used for such purposes, belonging to or connected with the same,” shall be exempt from taxation. Laws N. Y: 1887, c. 713, § 1, provides? *714“All property which shall pass by will, * * * other than * * * societies, corporations, and institutions now exempt by law from taxation * * * shall be and is subject to a tax of five dollars on every hundred dollars,” etc. From a decree of the surrogate holding that a legacy to said society under the will of Wealtha A. Neale, deceased, was taxable, the society appeals.

Argued before Barnard, P. J., and Dykman and Pratt, JJ.

*Moore & Wallace, (Thomas 8. Moore,*of counsel,) for appellant. *Edmond Conger*Brown, for executors. *James W. Ridgway,*Dist. Atty., for county treasurer.

Pratt, J.

The questions involved in this appeal were considered in *Re Herr's Will,*7 N. Y. Supp. 852. By the rule there laid down the decree made below is erroneous, and must be reversed, and the Faith Home for Incurables declared free from taxation. Decree reversed. All concur.
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Annual report of Global Realty Development
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB as amended for the period ending
December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter Voss, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



Date:  March 27, 2008                        By: /s/ Peter Voss
                                                -----------------------
                                                Peter Voss
                                                Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                        0001002137
<NAME>                        SWISSRAY INTERNATIONAL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1
<CASH>                                     2,259,277
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                              2,394,187
<ALLOWANCES>                               35,229
<INVENTORY>                                8,515,878
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           14,412,445
<PP&E>                                     6,792,878
<DEPRECIATION>                             687,481
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             27,231,803
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      13,742,388
<BONDS>                                    9,708,083
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                                   46,380
<OTHER-SE>                                 3,734,942
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               27,231,803
<SALES>                                    3,656,441
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           3,656,441
<CGS>                                      2,836,914
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              2,836,914
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           3,168,008
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         653,896
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,185,824)
<INCOME-TAX>                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,185,824)
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            (29,667)
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,215,491)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              (.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (.71)


        

</TABLE>
# USCIS Contracting Opportunities

Listed below are the current USCIS contract opportunities valued between $15,000 - $25,000. Federal Business Opportunities (FedBizOpps) lists opportunities over $25K. See additional details on each solicitation.

Subscribe to get notification of new opportunities:

Get Updates by Email
e.g. name@email.com

06/04/2018

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 178 / Friday, September 17, 2021 / Presidential Documents 52069 

Notice of September 15, 2021 

Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Persons Who Commit, Threaten To Commit, or Support Terrorism 

On September 23, 2001, by Executive Order 13224, the President declared 

a national emergency pursuant to the International Emergency Economic 

Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the 

United States constituted by the grave acts of terrorism and threats of terrorism committed by foreign terrorists, including the terrorist attacks on 

September 11, 2001, in New York and Pennsylvania and against the Pentagon, 

and the continuing and immediate threat of further attacks against United 

States nationals or the United States. 

On September 9, 2019, the President signed Executive Order 13886 to 

strengthen and consolidate sanctions to combat the continuing threat posed 

by international terrorism and to take additional steps to deal with the 

national emergency declared in Executive Order 13224, as amended. 

The actions of persons who commit, threaten to commit, or support terrorism 

continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, 

foreign policy, and economy of the United States. For this reason, the 

national emergency declared in Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 

2001, as amended, and the measures adopted to deal with that emergency, 

must continue in effect beyond September 23, 2021. Therefore, in accordance 

with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), 

I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency with respect to persons 

who commit, threaten to commit, or support terrorism declared in Executive 

Order 13224, as amended. 

52070 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 178 / Friday, September 17, 2021 / Presidential Documents 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to 

the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

September 15, 2021. [FR Doc. 2021–20351 

Filed 9–16–21; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 3295–F1–P 


BIDEN.EPS</GPH>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

In the Matter of 

JAMES W. GERLACH 

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT 

FROM RETIRED STATUS 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

No. 40 DB 2015 (No. 34 RST 2015) 

Attorney Registration No. 32165 

(Chester County) 

O R D E R 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 27th day of May, 2015, the Report and Recommendation of 

Disciplinary Board Member dated May 15, 2015, is approved and it is ORDERED that 

James W. Gerlach, who has been on retired status, has never been suspended or 

disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, competency and 

learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, 

hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The 

expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of this matter shall 

be paid by the Petitioner.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


    Form of Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
                           of the United States Code


I, Richard Chambers, the chief financial officer of Rogers International Raw
Materials Fund L.P. certify that (i) the Form 10K fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10K fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Rogers
International Raw Materials Fund L.P.


                                                /s/ Richard Chambers
                                                --------------------
                                               Chief Financial Officer
                                                   March 22, 2003
509 A.2d 1313

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant, v. Brent Allen KIEHL, Appellee.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued March 5, 1985.

Filed June 2, 1986.

William M. Kern, District Attorney, Clarion, for Commonwealth, appellant.

David M. Speer, Clarion, for appellee.

*354Before OLSZEWSKI, HESTER and SHIOMOS,* JJ.

**Judge Thomas N. Shiomos, Senior Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania is sitting by designation.

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:1

Appellee, Brent Allen Kiehl, was arrested February 19, 1983 and charged with driving under the influence of alcohol, a violation of section 3731(a)(l)(4) of the Pennsylvania Vehicle Code of 1976 as amended, 75 P.S. § 3731(a)(l)(4). Appellee filed a request for acceptance into Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition (ARD). The district attorney summarily rejected appellee’s request, citing none of the reasons set forth in the statute for excluding the defendant from the program but merely saying he was philosophically opposed to it. Appellee filed a rule to show cause and the lower court on its own motion admitted appellee to ARD. This appeal followed.

The sole question before us is “whether in a prosecution for driving (under the influence) under the Motor Vehicle Code, 75 Pa.C.S.A. 3731, a defendant may be admitted to Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition (ARD) over the objection of the attorney for the Commonwealth.” *Commonwealth v. Lutz,*508 Pa. 297, 302, 495 A.2d 928, 930 (1985). This question was answered in the negative by our Supreme Court in *Commonwealth v. Lutz. Id.*In that case the Court stated:

> ... the decision to submit the case for ARD rests in the sound discretion of the district attorney, and absent an abuse of that discretion involving some criteria for admission to ARD wholly, patently and without doubt unrelated to the protection of society and/or the likelihood of a person’s success in rehabilitation, such as race, religion or other such obviously prohibited considerations, the attorney for the Commonwealth must be free to submit a case or not submit it for ARD consideration based on his view of what is most beneficial for society and the offender. *Compare Shade v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania De*
>       *355
>       *partment of Transportation,*394 F.Supp. 1237, 1242 (M.D.Pa.1975), citing *Oyler v. Boles,*368 U.S. 448, 82 S.Ct. 501, 7 L.Ed.2d 446 (1962).

*Id.,*508 Pa. at 310, 495 A.2d at 935.

Thus, while the district attorney has sole discretion to move for a defendant’s admission into ARD, the prosecutor may not summarily reject a person from consideration for admission. The *Lutz*Court noted that in all of the cases before it, “the prosecutors (had) openly specified their reasons for not submitting the cases for ARD____” *Lutz,*508 Pa. at 310, 495 A.2d at 934. For these reasons we reverse the order of the court below and remand this case for a hearing to allow the district attorney to openly specify the reasons for not submitting this case for ARD.

Reversed and remanded. Jurisdiction relinquished.

. Case assigned to Judge Peter Paul Olszewski for opinion writing on May 20, 1986.
# USCIS Announces Final Phase of Premium Processing Expansion for EB-1 and EB-2 Form I-140 Petitions and Future Expansion for F-1 Students Seeking OPT and Certain Student and Exchange Visitors

01/12/2023

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services is implementing the final phase of the premium processing expansion for Form I-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien Workers, under the EB-1 and EB-2 classifications.

Unlike previous phases of the expansion, this phase applies to new (initial) petitions, in addition to all previously filed Form I-140 petitions under an E13 multinational executive and manager classification or E21 classification as a member of professions with advanced degrees or exceptional ability seeking a national interest waiver (NIW).

Petitioners who wish to request premium processing must file Form I-907, Request for Premium Processing Service.

Beginning Jan. 30, 2023, we will accept Form I-907 requests for:
                - All pending E13 multinational executive and manager petitions and E21 NIW petitions; and
                - All initial E13 multinational executive and manager petitions and E21 NIW petitions.

As previously announced, we are expanding premium processing to additional form types as part of our efforts to increase efficiency and reduce burdens to the overall legal immigration system. In March, we will expand premium processing to certain F-1 students seeking Optional Practical Training (OPT) and F-1 students seeking STEM OPT extensions who have a pending Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization. In April, we will expand premium processing to F-1 students seeking OPT and F-1 students seeking STEM OPT extensions who are filing an initial Form I-765. We will announce specific dates for each group in February.

As we implement the expansion of premium processing in a phased approach, we will continue working toward premium processing availability of Form I-539, Application to Extend/Change Nonimmigrant Status. We anticipate expanding premium processing for certain student and exchange visitors with pending Form I-539 applications in May and certain student and exchange visitors who are filing initial Form I-539 applications in June. We will make an announcement when we are ready to implement these phases. We will also adhere to the legislative requirement that the expansion of premium processing does not result in an increase in processing times for immigration benefit requests not designated for premium processing or an increase in regular processing of immigration benefit requests so designated.

01/12/2023

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
exv10w6wa






Exhibit 10.6(a)



June 9, 2009

John W. Henry & Company, Inc.

301 Yamato Road, Suite 2200

Boca Raton, Fl. 33431-4931


Attn: Mr. Ken Webster




     Re: Management Agreement Renewals



Dear Mr. Webster:



We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which
reference is made below (the “Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management
Agreements through June 30, 2010 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain
unchanged.





	 	•	 	Smith Barney Westport Futures Fund L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	JWH Master Fund LLC
	 
	 	•	 	Citigroup Diversified Futures Fund
	 
	 	•	 	CMF Institutional Futures Portfolio LP




Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it
to the attention of Ms. Jennifer Magro at the address above or fax to 212-793-1986. If you have any
questions I can be reached at 212-559-5046.



Very truly yours,



CITIGROUP MANAGED FUTURES LLC




	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Jennifer Magro
	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Jennifer Magro	 	 
	 

	 	Chief Financial Officer & Director	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	JOHN W. HENRY & COMPANY, INC

	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Kenneth Webster	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	Print Name: Kenneth Webster	 	 






JM/sr
#### Barnes, Respondent, *v.*Keene, Appellant.

*(Superior Court of New York City, General Term.*

June 27, 1890.)

Appeal from jury term.

Action by Lucien Barnes against James R. Keene.

*958Argued before Freedman and Truax, JJ.

*Shipman, Barlow, Larocque*& *Choate,*for appellant. *S. H. Randall,*for respondent.

Per Curiam.

Upon the whole case no error appears which constitutes ground for reversal; nor can it be held that the verdict is excessive. The •judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 10 (Friday, January 14, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 2413]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-977]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. 225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than February 2, 2000.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (D. Michael Manies, 
Assistant Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 
64198-0001:
    1. Glasnapp Family Limited Partnership I; Raymond E. Glasnapp; Erma 
Lee Glasnapp, all of Mission Hills, Kansas; Randy E. Glasnapp, Overland 
Park, Kansas; Cheryl G. Wright, Kansas City, Missouri; and Peggy G. 
Herrington, Purcellville, Virginia; to acquire voting shares of First 
Olathe Bancshares, Inc., Kansas City, Missouri, and thereby indirectly 
acquire voting shares of The First National Bank of Olathe, Olathe, 
Kansas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 11, 
2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-977 Filed 1-13-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P