alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### McBride *et al. v.*Langan *et al.*

*(Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County.*

April 14, 1890.)

Arrest—In Civil Actions—Fraud—Pleading.

Where the complaint in an action for goods sold alleges, in the language of Code Civil Proc. N. Y. § 549, subd. 4, providing for arrest in civil cases, that defendants were “ guilty of a fraud in contracting or incurring the liability, ’’ it may be amended so as to state the facts constituting the fraud.

At chambers. Action by Harry McBride and Charles F. Droste, partners under the firm name of McBride *&*Co., against Patrick T. Langan and others, partners under firm name of *P.*T. Langan & Co. A motion having been made to dismiss the complaint, in that the averment that defendants “ were guilty of a fraud in contracting or incurring the liability” did not state sufficient facts, plaintiff moves for leave to amend. For motion to vacate order of arrest, see *ante,*552.

*Francis W. Judge, Jr.,*for plaintiffs. *J. Woolsey Shepard,*for defendants.

Barrett, J.

As upon the other motion I have upheld the order of arrest, there can be no good reason for refusing the amendment. The observations as to jurisdiction made in disposing of the other motion apply to this. It is not a case where we are asked to insert an allegation of fraud in a complaint which is simply upon contract, but in a complaint which attempts to set up fraud, but does it insufficiently. The plaintiffs thought they might plead the language of the statute,1 and certainly the case cited upon the motion looks as though they had some justification for their practice. I think, however, that in that case the court .scarcely meant to go as far as the plaintiffs now contend, and that the observations of the court must be held to refer to the facts actually in the complaint; for clearly the complaint there showed fraud as matter of fact independent of the general averment in the language of the statute. The amendment here asked should be granted, but I cannot see any justification for the suggestion that it should be without terms. The plain*555tiff should be required to pay the trial fee upon the trial which resulted in his withdrawal of a juror for the purpose of making this motion, and $10 costs of this motion.

1

 Code Civil Proc. N. Y. § 549, subd. 4, provides for arrest “in an action upon contract, express or implied, * * * where it is alleged in the complaint that the defendant was guilty of a fraud in contracting or incurring the liability. ”
Exhibit 31.4



SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION



I, Thomas Skiba, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Sajan, Inc.; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: April 28, 2017 | /s/ Thomas Skiba                             
|-------------------- | ---------------------------------------------
|                     | Thomas Skiba,
        Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 13.1

Annual Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,
United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Prudential plc (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 December 2016 of the Company fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



|              |  |  |  |        |  |                      
|------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | ---------------------
|              |  |  | 
|24 March 2017 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ Mike Wells       
|              |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Mike Wells           
|              |  |  |  | Title: |  | Group Chief Executive



|              |  |  |  |        |  |                        
|------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|              |  |  | 
|24 March 2017 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ Nic Nicandrou      
|              |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Nic Nicandrou          
|              |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 264 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 264

To provide for the issuance of a semipostal to benefit the Peace Corps, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2015

   Ms. Lee introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the 
     Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the issuance of a semipostal to benefit the Peace Corps, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Peace Stamp for the Peace Corps 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PEACE CORPS SEMIPOSTAL.

    (a) In General.--The United States Postal Service shall, for a 2-
year period beginning no later than 12 months after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, issue a semipostal to benefit the Peace Corps.
    (b) Requirements and Authorities.--The issuance of such semipostal 
and the disposition of the amounts becoming available from the issuance 
of such semipostal shall be governed by section 416 of title 39, United 
States Code, subject to the following:
            (1) The differential included in the rate of postage 
        established for such semipostal under section 416(c) of such 
        title may not exceed 25 percent.
            (2) The Peace Corps shall be the sole agency to which any 
        amounts becoming available from the sale of such semipostal may 
        be transferred under section 416(d)(1) of such title.
    (c) Semipostal Defined.--For purposes of this section, the term 
``semipostal'' has the meaning given such term by section 416(a)(1) of 
such title.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM RAYTEL
MEDICAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           7,860
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,265<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                47,076
<PP&E>                                          38,670
<DEPRECIATION>                                (18,769)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 123,335
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,389
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                      64,526
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   123,335
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                53,015
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   46,259
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   380
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F2>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,509
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,867
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,947
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,920
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,920
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .31
<FN>
<F1>REPRESENTS NET RECEIVABLES.
<F2>INCLUDED IN TOTAL COSTS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5768 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the waiver of the 

collection of copayments for telehealth and telemedicine visits of veterans, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 15, 2010 

Mr. WELCH (for himself, Mr. BOOZMAN, Ms. BORDALLO, Mr. TEAGUE, and 

Mr. MICHAUD) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the 

waiver of the collection of copayments for telehealth and 

telemedicine visits of veterans, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO WAIVE COLLECTION OF COPAY4 MENTS FOR TELEHEALTH AND TELEMEDI5 CINE VISITS OF VETERANS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter III of chapter 17 of 

7 title 38, United States Code, is amended by inserting after 

8 section 1722A the following new section: 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5768 IH

1 ‘‘§ 1722B. Copayments: waiver of collection of copay2 ments for telehealth and telemedicine 

3 visits of veterans 

4 ‘‘The Secretary may waive the imposition or collec5 tion of copayments for telehealth and telemedicine visits 

6 of veterans under the laws administered by the Sec7 retary.’’. 

8 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

9 at the beginning of chapter 17 of such title is amended 

10 by inserting after the item relating to section 1722A the 

11 following new item: 

‘‘1722B. Copayments: waiver of collection of copayments for telehealth and telemedicine visits of veterans.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Nicholas R. Schacht, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report of Learning Tree International, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 3, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Learning Tree International, Inc.

May 12, 2009



| |  |                             
| |  | ----------------------------
| |  | By:  /s/ Nicholas R. Schacht
| |  | Nicholas R. Schacht         
| |  | Chief Executive Officer     

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Learning Tree International, Inc. and will be retained by Learning Tree International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-1463

___________

Glenn R. Waite, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

* Appeal from the United States

Lanet S. Asmussen, Clerk of the * District Court for the 

Nebraska Supreme Court; Janice J. * District of Nebraska.

Culver, Deputy Clerk; Pamela J. Kraus, *

Appellate Clerk; Jill R. Machacek, * [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellate Clerk, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: December 5, 1997

 Filed: December 23, 1997 

___________

Before McMILLIAN, BEAM, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Glenn R. Waite brought a 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985(3) action against four

Nebraska court clerks. Waite claimed the clerks individually, and in conspiracy, denied

him access to the courts and equal protection by refusing to file his pleading seeking
The Honorable William G. Cambridge, Chief Judge, United States District

1

Court for the District of Nebraska.

-2-

to reopen an appeal in which the mandate had issued nearly three years earlier. The

district court granted defendants summary judgment based on absolute quasi-judicial 1

immunity. Waite appeals.

We conclude summary judgment was proper, as the evidence showed the clerks

were directed by Nebraska judges not to file Waite&s pleading. See Rogers v.

Bruntrager, 841 F.2d 853, 856 (8th Cir. 1988) (clerks of court have absolute quasijudicial immunity from actions for damages arising from acts that “they are specifically

required to do under court order or at a judge&s direction”); Moses v. Parwatikar, 813

F.2d 891, 892-93 (8th Cir.) (conspiracy claim cannot overcome absolute immunity),

cert. denied, 484 U.S. 832 (1987). The district court did not abuse its discretion in

denying Waite leave to amend his complaint after the summary judgment motion was

filed. See Wald v. Southwestern Bell Corp. Customcare Med. Plan, 83 F.3d 1002,

1005 (8th Cir. 1996) (standard of review). 

We deny Waite&s request for leave to file a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(a)

motion in the district court, because we consider the continuance motion he wanted

transmitted to this court to already be part of the record on appeal. We find no abuse

of discretion in the district court&s refusal to continue the case to permit Waite to

conduct discovery prior to entry of summary judgment. See In re Temporomandibular

Joint (TMJ) Implants Prods. Liab. Litig., 113 F.3d 1484, 1489 (8th Cir. 1997) (standard

of review).

Accordingly, we affirm.
-3-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-20212 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JERAMIE NELSON, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-676-1

-------------------- October 25, 2001 Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jeramie Nelson appeals his guilty-plea conviction for being a felon in possession of ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Nelson contends that the factual basis was insufficient to support his guilty plea because the interstate commerce element of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) cannot constitutionally be construed to cover ammunition that had simply traveled across state lines at some point in the past. The Government’s allegation that the ammunition was manufactured in South Dakota and possessed by Nelson in TexasNo. 01-20212 -2- provided a sufficient factual basis for the interstate commerce element of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). See United States v. Daugherty , 264 F.3d 513 (5th Cir. 2001), 2001 WL 984679, **1, 4, n.12. As this court recently reaffirmed, “the constitutionality of [18 U.S.C.] § 922(g)(1) is not open to question.” See id. (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Yilun Jin, the Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer of AMERICAN LORAIN CORPORATION (the Company), DO HEREBY CERTIFY
that:

| | 1. | The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal
      year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report), fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
      the Company.                                                               

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this
statement this 30th day of April 2010.

/s/ Yilun JinYilun Jin Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to American Lorain Corporation and will be retained by
American Lorain Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to §18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

---
# CI2021466EN.01000201.xml

| 18.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 466/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 466/2

---

Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

(2021/C 466 I/02)

Pursuant to Article 9(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (1), the Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (2) are hereby amended as follows:

On page 271:

The following text and photos are added:

| ‘6307 90 10 | Knitted or crocheted |
| --- | --- |
| and | |
| 6307 90 91 | Of felt |
| and | |
| 6307 90 98 | Other

  These subheadings include articles of textile materials in the shape of baskets or dens for animals or similar articles designed for animals to rest inside or upon, whether or not they have a removable pillow/mattress or a padded bottom etc.
  However, pillows and blankets presented separately are generally not identifiable as designed for animals (heading 9404 or 6301 etc.).
  See also the CN Explanatory Notes to heading 9404 .
  Examples of some of these articles:






  1) | Articles having a padded/stuffed bottom:



  (see also Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 349/2014 of 3 April 2014 (OJ L104 of 8.4.2014, p.1)). |

‘6307 90 10

Knitted or crocheted

and

6307 90 91

Of felt

and

6307 90 98

Other

These subheadings include articles of textile materials in the shape of baskets or dens for animals or similar articles designed for animals to rest inside or upon, whether or not they have a removable pillow/mattress or a padded bottom etc.

However, pillows and blankets presented separately are generally not identifiable as designed for animals (heading 9404 or 6301 etc.).

See also the CN Explanatory Notes to heading 9404 .

Examples of some of these articles:

1)

Articles having a padded/stuffed bottom:

(see also Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 349/2014 of 3 April 2014 (OJ L104 of 8.4.2014, p.1)).

| 2) | Articles having a removable pillow: |
| --- | --- |

2)

Articles having a removable pillow:

| 3) | Articles in the shape of a den: |
| --- | --- |

3)

Articles in the shape of a den:

| 4) | Articles in the shape of a “snuggling bag/sleeping bag”:





  ’ |
| --- | --- |

4)

Articles in the shape of a “snuggling bag/sleeping bag”:

On page 404:

On page 404:

9404

9404

The following text is added:

The following text is added:

‘This heading does not include articles in the shape of baskets or dens for animals or similar articles designed for animals to rest inside or upon, whether or not these articles have a removable pillow/mattress or a padded bottom etc. (heading 6307 or 4602 etc. depending on the constituent materials of the article), because these articles are not similar to articles of bedding and similar furnishing.

See also the CN Explanatory Notes to subheadings 6307 90 10 and 6307 90 91 and 6307 90 98.’

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1).

1

(2)  OJ C 119, 29.3.2019, p. 1.

2

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5734 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5734

  To direct the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to 
  extend and improve the Dealer Floor Plan Pilot Initiative, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 14, 2010

  Mr. Donnelly of Indiana (for himself and Mr. Upton) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to 
  extend and improve the Dealer Floor Plan Pilot Initiative, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Dealer Floor Plan Program Extension 
and Improvement Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT OF THE DEALER FLOOR PLAN PILOT 
              INITIATIVE.

    (a) In General.--The Administrator of the Small Business 
Administration shall carry out a program to make available loan 
guarantees to assist dealers of titleable assets to finance inventory 
(in this section referred to as the ``program'').
    (b) Administration.--Except as otherwise provided under this 
section, the Administrator shall carry out the program in the same 
manner as the Dealer Floor Plan Pilot Initiative of the Small Business 
Administration, as in effect on May 1, 2010.
    (c) Maximum Participation.--The Administrator may guarantee not 
more than 90 percent of a loan under the program.
    (d) Authority To Revise Program.--Not later than 60 days after the 
date of enactment of this Act, and after consulting with 
representatives of lending institutions and manufacturers and dealers 
of titleable assets, the Administrator shall issue regulations revising 
the program to address barriers to program participation experienced by 
lending institutions and dealers of titleable assets.
    (e) Termination.--The program shall terminate on September 30, 
2015.
                                 <all>
```