alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of United Energy
Corp. (the "Company") for the year ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Dated:   July 29, 2004                   By: /s/ Ronald Wilen
                                             --------------------------------
                                              Ronald Wilen
                                              Chief Executive Officer
                                              (Principal Executive Officer)

Dated:   July 29, 2004                   By: /s/ James McKeever
                                             --------------------------------
                                              James McKeever
                                              Interim Chief Financial Officer
                                              (Principal Financial and
                                              Accounting Officer)

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

         The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the
report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and,
accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as
part of the report and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of
the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the
report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such
filing).
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 10 (Friday, January 14, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 2436]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-947]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-35, 989]


LeTourneau, Incorporated; Longview, Texas; Dismissal of 
Application for Reconsideration

    Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative 
reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance for workers at the LeTourneau, Incorporated, 
Longview, Texas. The application contained no new substantial 
information which would bear importantly on the Department's 
determination. Therefore, dismissal of the application was issued.

TA-W-35, 989; LeTourneau, Incorporated Longview, Texas (January 5, 
2000)

    Signed at Washington, DC this 7th day of January, 2000.
Grant D. Beale,
Program Manager, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-947 Filed 1-13-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Exhibit 12.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I,
Alain Tingaud, certify that:

1.    I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of InfoVista;

2.    Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The
company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:



5.    The
company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the
audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|                       |  | By: /s/ ALAIN TINGAUD
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|---------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
|Date: October 23, 2003 |  |                                                           

---

QuickLinks
Date

2024

Observance Authorization

15 January Martin Luther King Jr. Day Public Law 98-144

February Black History Month Public Law 99-244

March Women’s History Month Public Law 100-9

5 May - 12 May Days of Remembrance Public Law 96-388

May Asian American, Native Hawaiian, 

and Pacific Islander Heritage Month

Title 36, U.S. Code, Section 102

June LGBTQ+ Pride Month

19 June Juneteenth Public Law 117-17

26 August Women’s Equality Day Public Law 93-105

15 September-15 October National Hispanic Heritage Month Title 36, U.S. Code, Section 126

October National Disability Employment 

Awareness Month

Title 36, U.S. Code, Section 121

November National Native American 

Heritage Month

Public Law 103-462

Special Observances

United States Coast Guard

The Coast Guard recognizes eleven special observances throughout the calendar year which are 

authorized by Public Law, Bill, Executive Order, or Presidential Proclamation. All Coast Guard 

commands and units are encouraged to conduct programs and promote participation in activities that 

recognize the observances reflected above. Annually, themes are articulated through proclamation 

from the President or national Affinity Organizations. For more information about each observance, 

visit the Coast Guard’s Special Observance Page. 

Presidential Proclamation 

Issued Annually
#### Raymond L. FRAZIER, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant.

No. CIV-81-365-D.

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma.

March 15, 1982.

John B. Combs, Edmond, Okl., Bert A. Richard, Jr., Guthrie, Okl., for plaintiff.

Larry D. Patton, U.S. Atty., Oklahoma City, Okl., Paul Richards, Asst. U.S. Atty., Oklahoma City, Okl, for defendant.

ORDER

DAUGHERTY, District Judge.

The attorneys for the Plaintiff have filed their Application to Set Attorneys Fee following a compromise settlement of this action. This action was filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671 *et seq.*Plaintiff’s attorneys assert that the provisions of the Act require the Court to set attorneys’ fees. The Court disagrees and declines to set said fees at this time.

Prior to the effective date of the 1966 amendments to the Federal Tort Claims Act, Section 2678 provided that a Court rendering a judgment for the Plaintiff or an agency agreeing to settle with a claimant “may,” as a part of the judgment or settlement, determine and allow reasonable attorney’s fees up to certain maximum amounts. However, Section 2678 was amended in 1966 by Pub.L. 89-506. The Senate Committee report commented on this change as follows:

> Section 4, as amended, raises the limitations concerning attorneys fees in the first paragraph of section 2678 from 10 to 20 percent for administrative settlements, and from 20 to 25 percent for fees in cases after suit is filed. The language of the committee amendment merely places a limit on fees and removes from the section the requirement of agency or court allowance of the amount of attorneys fees. The actual amount of attorneys fees within the statutory limits, therefore, is made a matter for determination between the litigant and his attorney.

> S.Rep. No. 1327, 89th Cong., 2d Sess. (1966), *reprinted in*1966 U.S.Code Cong. & Adm. News 2515, at 2521.

Clearly, under the current version of Section 2678, the successful plaintiff has no automatic right to have attorney’s fees set *204by the Court. The applicants have stated no special reason for Court involvement in the setting of attorneys’ fees in the instant case, and the Court finds none at this time. Of the few reported cases under the new version of Section 2678, the two cases in which the reasons for Court involvement are discussed show that special circumstances obtained therein, *Pollard v. United States,*69 F.R.D. 646 (D.C.Ala.1976) (protection of class members in class action); *Jaslow v. United States,*308 F.Supp. 1164 (D.C.N.Y.1970) (inadequate fee to be split among three sets of attorneys).

The Court concludes that the Application should be denied at this time.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          28,609                                         
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         726,482
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                29,204
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    160,884
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         276,826
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           278,434
<LOANS>                                        462,130
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (4,928)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 983,042    
<DEPOSITS>                                     887,142
<SHORT-TERM>                                    17,005
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              5,262
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,033
<OTHER-SE>                                      70,600
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 983,042
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                      0
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                7,260
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   363
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                17,501
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               7,467
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,674
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            9,827
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      200
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,738
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,225
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,365
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,365
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.34
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.71
<LOANS-NON>                                        811
<LOANS-PAST>                                       102
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 4,938
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      322     
<RECOVERIES>                                       112
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,928
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             4,928
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### Benito ESTRADA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-74816.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 20, 2011.*

Filed April 22, 2011.

Patricia Vargas, Patricia Vargas & Associates, Alhambra, CA, for Petitioner.

Keith Ian McManus, Senior Litigation Counsel, OIL, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: RYMER, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Benito Estrada, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order sustaining the government’s appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We grant the petition for review and remand.

The BIA concluded that the IJ lacked jurisdiction to reopen proceedings without the benefit of our decision in *Reyes-Torres v. Holder,*645 F.3d 1073, 2011 WL 1312570 (9th Cir.2011) (mandate pending), in which we determined that 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(d) did not apply to preclude a motion to reopen filed after the petitioner had been removed. *See Reyes-Torres,*645 F.3d at 1075-78, 2011 WL 1312570, at *2-*3 (citing *Coyt v. Holder,*593 F.3d 902 (9th Cir. 2010)); *see also Reynoso-Cisneros v. Gonzales,*491 F.3d 1001, 1002 (9th Cir.2007) (per curiam) (treating departure bars to motions under 8 C.F.R. §§ 1003.2(d) and 1003.23(b)(1) as substantively identical). We remand to the BIA in light of this intervening case law.

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 99.1



Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
Harbor Global Company Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen G. Kasnet, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    STEPHEN G.
KASNET                                
|Stephen G. Kasnet Chief Executive Officer March 11,
2003



This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5825 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 28, 2010 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To review, update, and revise the factors to measure the 

severity, magnitude, and impact of a disaster and to 

evaluate the need for assistance to individuals and households. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5825 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Multi-State Disaster 

3 Relief Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. INDIVIDUAL ASSISTANCE FACTORS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—In order to provide more objective 

6 criteria for evaluating the need for assistance to individ7 uals and households and to speed a declaration of a major 

8 disaster or emergency under the Robert T. Stafford Dis9 aster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 

10 5121 et seq.), not later than one year after the date of 

11 enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Federal 

12 Emergency Management Agency (referred to in this Act 

13 as the ‘‘Administrator’’), in cooperation with representa14 tives of State and local emergency management agencies, 

15 shall review, update, and revise through rulemaking the 

16 factors considered under section 206.48(b) of title 44, 

17 Code of Federal Regulations, to measure the severity, 

18 magnitude, and impact of a disaster. 

19 (b) CONSIDERATION OF A CONTIGUOUS COUNTY.— 

20 In reviewing, updating, and revising the factors referenced 

21 in subsection (a) the Administrator shall include as a fac22 tor whether a contiguous county in an adjacent state has 

23 been designated in a major disaster or emergency as a 

24 result of the same incident. 

25 (c) REPORT.—Not later than 3 months after the date 

26 of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall submit 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 5825 RFS 

1 to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

2 of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 

3 Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Sen4 ate a report on the Federal Emergency Management 

5 Agency’s current regulations, policies, procedures, and 

6 practices on— 

7 (1) recommending major disaster or emergency 

8 declarations in order to provide assistance to individ9 uals and households; and 

10 (2) making post-declaration designations of the 

11 need for assistance to individuals and households in 

12 a county that is contiguous to a State that has re13 ceived a major disaster or emergency declaration for 

14 the same incident. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 27, 2010. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
# Direct Filing Addresses for Form I-526, Immigrant Petition by Standalone Investor, and Form I-526E, Immigrant Petition by Regional Center Investor

Use the following address when filing your Form I-526 or Form I-526E, as well as your Form I-485, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status, if applicable .**Applications and petitions that are not mailed to the correct address may experience processing delays.**

07/13/2022

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

** **

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Blount International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James S. Osterman,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(i)                                     TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of thedates and for the periods expressed in the report.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to BlountInternational, Inc. and will be retained by Blount International, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

 

Date: August 4,2005

 

 
| /s/ James S.  Osterman     |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
| James S.  Osterman         |
| Chairman of the  Board and |
| Chief Executive  Officer   |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5800 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5800

  To withdraw certain land in the State of New Mexico, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 20, 2010

  Mr. Teague introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To withdraw certain land in the State of New Mexico, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Law Enforcement Training 
Center Protection Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. WITHDRAWAL OF FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING CENTER LAND.

    (a) In General.--For the purposes of protecting, operating, and 
maintaining the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center in Eddy County, 
New Mexico, and subject to valid existing rights, the Federal land 
described in subsection (b) is reserved for use by the Secretary of 
Homeland Security for the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center and 
withdrawn from--
            (1) entry, appropriation, or disposal under the public land 
        laws;
            (2) location, entry, and patent under the mining laws; and
            (3) operation of the mineral leasing, mineral materials, 
        and geothermal leasing laws.
    (b) Description of Land.--The Federal land referred to in 
subsection (a) is the approximately 2,700 acres of Federal land 
generally depicted as the ``Withdrawal Area'' on the map entitled 
``FLETC Land Withdrawal'' and dated May 4, 2010.
    (c) Withdrawal Period.--The withdrawal of the Federal land 
described in subsection (b) shall remain in effect for a period of 20 
years beginning on the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```