alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Walter E. ALONZO-RAMIREZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 10-70298.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 28, 2011.

Walter E. Alonzo-Ramirez, Lancaster, CA, pro se.

Anna Nelson, Jane Tracey Schaffner, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Walter E. Alonzo-Ramirez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeal’s (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s denial of a request for a continuance. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a request for a continuance, *Ahmed v. Holder,*569 F.3d 1009, 1012 (9th Cir.2009), and we deny in part, and dismiss in part, the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Alonzo-Ramirez’s request for a continuance for additional time to prepare an application for relief, where he had already received multiple continuances for that purpose, been specifically instructed to file his application, and the delay caused inconvenience to the agency and the government. *See id.*at 1013-14; *cf. Cui v. Mukasey,*538 F.3d 1289, 1293 (9th Cir. 2008).

We lack jurisdiction to consider Alonzo-Ramirez’s remaining contentions because he failed to exhaust them before the BIA. *See Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir.2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (in thousands) EXTRACTED
FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30,1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          49,562
<SECURITIES>                                   130,480
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,129
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,838
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               223,562
<PP&E>                                          62,552
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,561
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 355,237
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           64,692
<BONDS>                                        338,090
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     14,373
<COMMON>                                           200
<OTHER-SE>                                    (62,118)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   355,237
<SALES>                                         90,414
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                90,414
<CGS>                                           67,041
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   67,041
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,936
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,820
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (12,276)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (27,916)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (27,916)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (27,916)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.40)
        

</TABLE>
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ERIC A,

Pla i ntiff-Appe lle e , v. JASON M IC H AEL TER PSTR A, De fe nda nt-Appe l la

nt. No. 15-10375

D.C . No. 3:13-c r-08190-GM S-1 M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ariz o na G . M urray

Snow, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d August 24, 2016 ** B e fore : HUG, FAR

R IS, an d C ANB Y, C irc uit Judge s . Ja son M ic ha e l Te rpstra

a ppe a ls from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt a n d c ha lle nge s his guilty-ple a c onvic tion a

nd 110-m onth se nt e nc e for be ing a fe lon in posse s sion of fire arm s , in viola tion of 18 U.S.C . §§ 922(g)(1) a nd 924(a)(2). Pursua nt to Ande rs v . C

alifornia, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Terpstra ’ s c ounse l ha s file d 

# FIL ED AUG 26 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).a

brie f stating tha

t the re are no grounds for re lie f, a long with a m o tion to withdra

w a s c o unse l of re c ord. W e have provide d Te rpstra the opportunity

to file a pro se supple m e nta l brie f. No pro se supple m e nta l brie f or answe ring brie f ha s be e n file d . Te rpstra ha s wa ive d his right to a

p pe a l his c onvic tion a

nd se nte nc e . B e c a

use the re c ord disc lose s no a

rgua ble issue a s to theva lidity of the a ppe a l wa i ve rs, we dism iss thea

ppe a l . Se eUnite d State

s v . W atson , 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th C ir. 2009). W e de c line to re vie wany ine ffe c t ive a ssista

nc e of c ounse l c l a im s on dire c t a ppe a l. Se eUnite d State

s v . Rahman , 642 F.3d 1257, 1260 (9th C ir. 2011) (holding tha

t we re vie w ine ffe c tive a ssista n c e of c ounse l c la im s on dire c t a ppe a l only in theunusua l c a se s whe re the re c ord is suffic ie ntly de ve lope d or the le ga l re pre se ntation is so obviously ina de quate tha

t it de nie s a

de fe nda nt his Sixth Am e ndm e nt right to c ounse l). W e le av e ope n the possibility tha t Te rpstra m ight ra ise an ine ffe c tive a s sista

nc e of c ounse l c la im

in c olla te ra l proc e e dings. Se eid . C ounse l’ s m otion to withdra w a s c ounse l is G RANT E D . DISM I SSE D .

2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Maggette, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), rendered September 27, 1983, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, robbery in the first degree (two counts), robbery in the second degree, assault in the first degree, burglary in the first degree (two counts), attempted burglary in the second degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree (two counts), criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, possession of burglar’s tools, and resisting arrest (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed *(see, People v Pellegrino,*60 NY2d 636; *People v Harris,*61 NY2d 9; *People v Kazepis,*101 AD2d 816). Mangano, J. P., Brown, Lawrence, Weinstein and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
# CI2021406EN.01000501.xml

| 8.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 406/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 406/5

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2021/C 406 I/04)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

| Date and time of closure | 15.8.2021 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 15.8.2021 - 31.12.2021 |
| Member State | Italy |
| Fishing effort group code | EFF2/MED2_TR3 |
| Stock group | Giant red shrimp in GSAs 9, 10 and 11 |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | Vessels with overall length ≥ 18 m and < 24 m |
| Reference number | 16/TQ90 |

Date and time of closure

15.8.2021

Duration

15.8.2021 - 31.12.2021

Member State

Italy

Fishing effort group code

EFF2/MED2_TR3

Stock group

Giant red shrimp in GSAs 9, 10 and 11

Type(s) of fishing vessels

Vessels with overall length ≥ 18 m and < 24 m

Reference number

16/TQ90

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

---
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

O2Diesel Corporation (the "Company") is a Delaware corporation. The table below sets forth all of the Company's subsidiaries as to state
or jurisdiction of organization.

|Subsidiary               |  | State or Jurisdiction of Organization
|------------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|O2Diesel, Inc.           |  | Delaware                             
|O2Diesel Químicos, Ltda. |  | Brazil                               
|O2Diesel R&D SPA, S.L.   |  | Spain                                
|O2Diesel Europe PLC      |  | Ireland                              
|O2Diesel Asia Limited    |  | Ireland                              

---



QuickLinks
#### Dillard v. The State.

Appeal from Montgomery City Court.

Tried before the Hon. A. D. Sayre.

No counsel marked as appearing for appellant..

Charles G. Brown, Attorney-General, for the State.

Opinion by

Dowdell, J.

The appellant was indicted, tried and convicted for selling or disposing of property upon which there was a lien.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6579

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ERNEST LEON MYERS, JR., Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. William L. Osteen, District Judge, sitting by designation. (CR-92-96, CA-97-350) Submitted: July 20, 1999 Decided: August 12, 1999 Before HAMILTON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ernest Leon Myers, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Jerry Wayne Miller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and findno reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Myers , Nos. CR-92-96; CA-97-350 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 18, 1999). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Nancy Giandana, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Anna E. Demuth, Deceased, Respondent, v Providence Rest Nursing Home et al., Defendants. Providence Rest Nursing Home, Third-Party Plaintiff, v Ramar Services, Inc., Third-Party Defendant, and Becky Akosah, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

Submitted April 30, 2007;

decided June 5, 2007

Motion for reargument denied *[see*8 NY3d 859].

Judge Jones taking no part.
#### CALLAHAN v. SEARLES.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Second. Department.

May 14, 1894.)

False Imprisonment—What Constitutes.

Though plaintiff was not arrested by defendant’s order, the arrest is ratified, and constitutes a technical false imprisonment, where defendant afterwards ordered the officer to detain plaintiff, though it was only for a few minutes.

Appeal from circuit court, Westchester county.

Action by Timothy Callahan against Wilbur H. Searles for false imprisonment. From a judgment entered on a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $250, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Argued before BROWN, P. J., and PRATT, J.

William G. Valentine (Francis Larkin, of counsel), for appellant.

Nelson H. Baker, for respondent.

PRATT, J.

This is an action of false imprisonment, and the counsel for the defendant well says, in his brief, that such a case would not be likely to happen in a lifetime. That such a coincidence should happen is remarkable, but I think it is clear that an arrest and detention or imprisonment were sufficiently proved to sustain a verdict for the plaintiff. The fact that the officer went into the presence of the plaintiff, inquired about the stolen property, showed *905his shield, and told the plaintiff to come along with him to defendant’s, was an arrest. Even if plaintiff was not arrested by a distinct order of defendant, the act of the officer was ratified afterwards at the store where the defendant ordered plaintiff to be detained until it was proved that the shoes had been a few doors from defendant’s store. A technical false imprisonment was proved, within well-settled rules of law. Bissell v. Gold, 1 Wend. 210; Searls v. Viets, 2 Thomp. & C. 224; Mowry v. Chase, 100 Mass. 79-85; Churk v. Starin, 47 Hun, 345. We should have been much better satisfied with the verdict if it had been much smaller, but we are unable to say that it is so excessive as to warrant us in settine it aside. Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                           4,235
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  146,129
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               150,364
<PP&E>                                       1,071,284
<DEPRECIATION>                                (161,502)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,755,726
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,814,670
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,771
<OTHER-SE>                                  (1,075,715)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,755,726
<SALES>                                      3,373,456
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,373,456
<CGS>                                        3,208,363
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,208,363
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,595,563
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (8,430,470)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (8,430,470)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (8,430,470)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.55)





</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                               EXHIBIT 32(b)


 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, James M. Sullivan, Chief Financial Officer of Solutia Inc. (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
                  quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully
                  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                  in all material respects, the financial condition and
                  results of operations of the Company.


Dated: August 5, 2004



                                           /s/ JAMES M. SULLIVAN
                                           ---------------------------------
                                           James M. Sullivan
                                           Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Solutia Inc.
and will be retained by Solutia Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
---

Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION


906 OF THE SARBAENES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Mass Megawatts Wind Power, Inc. (the 'Company') on Form 10-KSB for the year ended April 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the 'Report'), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to such officer's knowledge: Section 13(a)





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of Section 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934: and





(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.





In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.






Mass Megawatts Wind Power, Inc.Date: July 31, 2009
By:
/s/ Jonathan RickerJonathan RickerTitle: Chairman, Chief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
#### PEOPLE v. McDOWELL.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fifth Department.

January 18, 1894.)

Prosecution against William A. McDowell for selling intoxicating liquors. Motion to amend decision so as to certify that the reversal was upon questions of law only, etc.

PER CURIAM.

It is true that the new trial in this case was granted the law; but we cannot certify that upon the facts we would affirm the conviction, for the reason that we think the evidence establishes, or that the jury might have found as facts, that the board of excise granted the defendant a license, that the commissioners of excise, composing the board, were one a de jure and the other a de facto officer, and that the defendant applied to such board for a license in good faith, believing the persons composing it to be de jure officers. See 23 N. Y. Supp. 950.
June 4, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

KHYATI UNDAVIA, MINU RX LTD, AND MINU GP, LLC, Appellants

NO. 14-15-00295-CV V.

AVANT MEDICAL GROUP, P.A. D/B/A INTERVENTIONAL SPINE

ASSOCIATES AND BRETT L. GARNER, D/B/A ALLIED MEDICAL

CENTERS, Appellees

________________________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the interlocutory 

permissive appeal from the order signed by the court below on March 20, 2015. 

Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal 

DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellants, Khyati Undavia, Minu RX Ltd., and Minu GP, LLC.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 Certification
of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
 As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 I, James
M. Sullivan, Chief Financial Officer of Solutia Inc. (the “Company”), certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 
 (1)
                the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
      ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and(2)
                the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 Dated:
July 28, 2009
 By:
                          /s/
      James M. SullivanJames
      M. SullivanExecutive
      Vice Presidentand
      Chief Financial Officer
  
  
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Solutia Inc. and will be retained by
Solutia Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
March 17, 2009
  Donald
Meyer (“Executive”)
 625
Madison Avenue
 New York,
NY  10022
  RE:
            Amendment
      to Executive Employment Agreement
  Dear
Donald:
  On
January 1, 2007, you and Centerline Capital Group, Inc.(the “Company”)
entered into an Executive Employment Agreement (the
“Agreement”).  Pursuant to Section 10(b) of the Agreement, the
Agreement may be amended by a written instrument signed by the Executive and the
Company.  The parties hereto wish to amend the Employment Agreement as
provided herein.
  THEREFORE,
the parties, intending to be legally bound, agree as follows:
  1.       Amendment
of Agreement.  Section 2,
entitled Duties, shall be
amended to change the title from Executive Managing Director and Chief
Investment Officer to Executive Managing Director, thereby relinquishing the
title of Chief Investment Officer, effective as of the date hereof.
  2.       Effect of
Amendment.The parties herby
agree and acknowledge that except as provided in this Amendment, the Agreement
remains in full force and effect and has not been modified in any other
respect.
  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
parties have executed this Agreement, Centerline Capital Group, Inc. and
Centerline Holding Company acting by their respective duly authorized officers,
effective as of the Effective Date.
   CENTERLINE
      CAPITAL GROUP, INC.
            
            EXECUTIVE:By
            /s/
      Marc D. Schnitzer
            
            /s/
      Donald MeyerName:
            Marc
      D. Schnitzer
            
            Name:
            Donald
      MeyerTitle:
            President
            
            
            Executive
      Managing DirectorCENTERLINE
      HOLDING COMPANYBy
            /s/
      Marc D. SchnitzerName:
            Marc
      D. SchnitzerTitle:
            Chief
      Executive Officer and President