alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2





                             AMERICAN SKIING COMPANY


                  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Skiing Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 26, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Helen
E. Wallace, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Date:  December 10, 2003

                               By:   /s/ Helen E. Wallace
                               --------------------------------
                               Helen E. Wallace
                               Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
                               (Principal Financial Officer)






         This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except
to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange
Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange
Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by
reference.
Exhibit 21.1

                              List of Subsidiaries

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               State of
Subsidiary                                     Incorporation     Doing Business AS
-------------------                            -------------     ------------------------------------------------
<S>                                            <C>               <C>
Homeland Security Strategies, Inc.             Delaware          Homeland Security Strategies, Inc.
Homeland Security Strategies of
   California, Inc.                            California        Homeland Security Strategies of California, Inc.
Homeland Security Strategies of Florida, Inc.  Florida           Homeland Security Strategies of Florida, Inc
Homeland Security Strategies (UK), Ltd.        London, UK        Homeland Security Strategies (UK), Ltd.
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTIION 1350 (AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the annual report of The Quantum Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB/A, Amendment 1 for the year ended October 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald B. Cohen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



Signed on September 19, 2008



/s/ Donald B. Cohen

Donald B. Cohen

Chief Financial Officer of The Quantum Group
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         3,800
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,739
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (15)
<INVENTORY>                                    2,604
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               394
<PP&E>                                         8,773
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,911)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 15,024
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,174
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       7
<OTHER-SE>                                     11,813
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   15,024
<SALES>                                        4,596
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4,596
<CGS>                                          (3,149)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  (3,149)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (3,279)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (180)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,472)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (52)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,524)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,524)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.23)
        


</TABLE>
#### Ramin NIKOOSERESHT, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Ben CURRY, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 07-16354.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued Aug. 9, 2010.

Resubmitted March 17, 2011.

Filed March 23, 2011.

*620Steve Defilippis, Picone & Defilippis, San Jose, CA, for Petitioner-Appellee.

Amber N. Wipfler, Esquire, Office of the California Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent-Appellant.

Before: GRABER, CALLAHAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Petitioner Ramin Nikooseresht is serving a prison sentence of 15 years to life for the 1992 murder of his girlfriend. In 2004, the parole board denied him parole. The California courts denied Petitioner’s habeas petition, concluding that there was “some evidence” to support the board’s decision. Petitioner sought federal habeas relief, which the district court granted on the ground that the state courts had unreasonably applied clearly established federal law concerning due process, by failing to satisfy California’s “some evidence” standard. The state timely appealed, arguing only that this is not a proper ground for federal habeas relief. That is, the state does not argue that, in fact, there is “some evidence” of Petitioner’s current or future dangerousness.

After this appeal began, the Supreme Court decided *Swarthout v. Cooke,*— U.S.-, 131 S.Ct. 859, 178 L.Ed.2d 732 (2011) (per curiam). Although Petitioner argues that *Swarthout*leaves open a question about the proper outcome here, we are not persuaded. The Supreme Court held that the Federal Due Process Clause requires a California inmate to receive only “an opportunity to be heard and ... a statement of the reasons why parole was denied.” *Id.*at 862. Petitioner received both. Moreover, the Court expressly held that due process does not mandate “correct application of the State’s ‘some evidence’ standard.” *Id.*at 861. Accordingly, even if the district court correctly concluded that the state misapplied its “some evidence” standard, habeas relief is not available to Petitioner.

REVERSED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 

********************************** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA * 

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD * 

* Docket No. 99-0427 

* Case No: [REDACTED]

 vs. * 

 * 

GREGORY B. MUSK * ORDER 

 * 

********************************** 

1. The Decision and Order in this case was issued on November 13, 2000. It found that the 

Jurisdictional and Factual Allegations of the Complaint were Proved by a Preponderance of 

the Evidence. The Complaint alleged that Mr. Musk committed an act of Misconduct for 

failing to submit to a random chemical test for dangerous drugs. Specifically, the Decision 

held that the Respondent substituted a urine sample in connection with a chemical test for 

dangerous drugs and that such act constituted a “refusal to test.” 

 The parties were afforded an opportunity to submit recommendations with regard to the 

Order to be issued against Respondent’s Coast Guard License and Merchant Mariner’s 

Document and those pleadings have been received. 

2. I have considered the evidence of record, the submissions of the parties, and the applicable 

law. In view of the Commandant’s Decision in Appeal Decision 2578 (CALLAHAN) and 

the Third Circuit’s holding in Exxon Shipping Company v. Exxon Seaman’s Union, 73 F.3d 

1287 (3rd Cir. 1996) the Investigating Officer’s recommendation that Mr. Musk’s credentials 

be revoked is approved. 

 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT Coast Guard License No. 683036 and all other 
2

Coast Guard issued licenses and documents issued to Gregory B. Musk are hereby REVOKED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT License No. 683036 and all other Coast Guard 

licenses and documents issued to Mr. Musk must be surrendered to the Coast Guard Marine 

Safety Office, Miami on or before January 26, 2001. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Gregory B. Musk is prohibited from serving 

under the authority of License No. 683036 or any other license or Merchant Mariner’s document 

issued by the United States Coast Guard after January 26, 2001. 

PETER A. FITZPATRICK 

Administrative Law Judge 

United States Coast Guard 

Dated on the ____ day of January 2001 

Norfolk, Virginia 
3

Certificate of Service 

I hereby certify that I have this day served the foregoing document(s) upon the following parties 

and limited participants (or designated representatives) in this proceeding at the address 

indicated by Facsimile: 

 Commanding Officer 

 MSO Miami, Attn: LT Mark Hammond 

 100 MacArthur Causeway 

 Miami Beach, FL 33139 

 (Fax #) 305-535-8742 

 Andrew Anderson, Esq. 

 Keller & Houck 

 200 S. Biscayne Blvd, Suite 3460 

 Miami, FL 33131-5308 

 (Fax #) 305-372-5044 

 

 

 

 

Dated at Norfolk, Virginia, this ____ day of January 2001. 

 

 Lucinda H. Shinault, CLA 

 Legal Assistant to the Administrative Law Judge
# C_2023100EN.01014601.xml

| 16.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 100/146 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 100/146

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on ‘Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down management, conservation and control measures applicable in the Area covered under the Southern Indian Ocean Fisheries Agreement (SIOFA)’

(COM(2022) 563 final — 2022/348 (COD))

(2023/C 100/23)

| Referral | European Parliament, 9.11.2022 |
| --- | --- |
| | Council, 10.11.2022 |
| Legal basis | Articles 43(2) and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union |
| Section responsible | Section for Agriculture, Rural Development and the Environment |
| Adopted at plenary | 14.12.2022 |
| Plenary session No | 574 |
| Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions) | 202/0/3 |

Referral

European Parliament, 9.11.2022

Council, 10.11.2022

Legal basis

Articles 43(2) and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Section responsible

Section for Agriculture, Rural Development and the Environment

Adopted at plenary

14.12.2022

Plenary session No

574

Outcome of vote

(for/against/abstentions)

202/0/3

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 14 December 2022.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Christa SCHWENG

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Transgenomic, Inc. for the quarter
ended March 31, 2011, I, Brett L. Frevert, Chief Financial Officer of Transgenomic, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Transgenomic, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Transgenomic, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Transgenomic, Inc.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ BRETT L. FREVERTBrett L. FrevertChief Financial Officer


Date: May 13, 2011

A signed original of the certification required by Section 906 has been provided to Transgenomic, Inc. and will be
retained by Transgenomic, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



34
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, John
C. Corey, President and Chief Executive Officer of Stoneridge, Inc. (the
“Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 (“the Report”) which this certification accompanies fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and





(2)  the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      John C. CoreyJohn
      C. Corey, President and Chief Executive OfficerMay
      7, 2010





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [NAFTA-03839]

Pursuant to Title V of the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (Pub. L. 103-182) concerning transitional adjustment assistance, hereinafter called (NAFTA-TAA), and in accordance with Section 250(a), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title II, of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273), an investigation was initiated on February 18, 2000 in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers at Ametek Aerospace, Wilmington, Massachusetts.

In a letter dated April 10, 2000, the petitioner requested that the petition for NAFTA-TAA be withdrawn. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of April, 2000.

Grant D. Beale,

Program Manager, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 00-9974 Filed 4-20-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
**Exhibit 13.1**

**HOLMES  FINANCING (NO. 4) PLC****4167953**

     **ABBEY  NATIONAL HOUSE   2 TRITON SQUARE, REGENTS PLACE****LONDON NW1 3AN**

**Certification****Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002****(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United  States Code)**

     Pursuant  to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of  section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer  of the servicer does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:  

     The  Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Form  20-F”) of Holmes Financing (No. 4) PLC (the “Company”) fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the  Company.

| Dated:      June 27, 2006 | /s/ Chris Fielding                                                            |
|---------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |                                                                               |
|                           | Chris      FieldingHead of Securitisation      and Treasury Advisory Services |
|                      |                                                                          |

     A  signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided  to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Oregon Coast Provincial Advisory Committee (PAC) will meet on May 25, 2000, at the Siuslaw National Forest, 4077 S.W. Research Way, Corvallis, Oregon. This is a change from the date of April 27, 2000, originally announced in the                         **Federal Register**                        , April 3, 2000 (Vol. 65, Number 64, page 17483). As stated in the original notice, the meeting time is 9:00 a.m. until 3:30 p.m. and all agenda items remain the same.                    

Interested citizens are encouraged to attend. The committee welcomes the public's written comments on committee business at any time.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Joni Quarnstrom, Public Affairs Specialist, Siuslaw National Forest, 541-750-7075, or write to the Forest Supervisor, Siuslaw National Forest, P.O. Box 1148, Corvallis, Oregon 97339.

Dated: April 13, 2000.

Jose L. Linares,

Acting Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 00-9736  Filed 4-18-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12

- 30231 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
ABDEL RAHIM MUHAMMAD , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:09

- CR

- 371

- 1

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, and SMITH and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Abdel Rahim Muhammad was convicted following a jury trial of armed bank robbery, using and carrying a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence, and conspiracy to commit money laundering . He was sentenced to a total of 162 months in prison, five years of supervised release, and restitution in the amount of $6,342.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 30, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 12-30231 Document: 00512647561 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/30/2014No. 12

- 30231

M uhammad argues that the trial evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction for conspiracy to commit money laundering . He contends that the
evidence did not establish that he committed the substantive offense of money laundering by any of the methods noted in 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a), including, inter alia, with the intent to promote the carrying on o f the armed bank robbery . He
did not move for a judgment of acquittal in the district court and, therefore, we review for plain error. See United States v. Delgado , 672 F.3d 320, 331

- 32 & n.9 (5th Cir. 2012) (en banc)

. Muhammad’s assertion that the evidence is insufficient to show that he committed an offense under § 1956(a) is inapposite . He was not convicted of violating § 1956(a) ; instead, he was convicted of conspiracy to commit money laundering under § 1956(h)

. “It is settled law tha t conspiring to commit an offense is wholly separate from the crime that is the object of the conspiracy”;
thus , “a conspiracy charge need not include the elements of the substantive offense the defendant may have conspired to commit.” United States v.
Th readgill , 172 F.3d 357, 367 (5th Cir. 1999). Therefore, the Government did
not have to prove the substantive offense of money laundering under § 1956(a) to sustain Muhammad’s conviction for conspiracy to commit money laundering in violation of § 1956(h). Muhammad has not otherwise identified deficiencies in the Government’s case regarding his conviction under § 1956(h). AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 12-30231 Document: 00512647561 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/30/2014