alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021040EN.01000201.xml

| 5.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 40/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 40/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9679 — United Group/Bulgarian Telecommunications Company)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 40/02)

On 3 April 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9679. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9679. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Coast GuardU.S. Department of Homeland Security

Search
Search

Search

-  Home    -  News Room             
  -  Reserve             
  -  Forcecom             
  -  Operations             
  -  Mission Support             
  -  Atlantic Area             
  -  Pacific Area             
  -  History 
-  Units    -  Organization             
  -  Coast Guard A to Z             
  -  Atlantic Area             
  -  Pacific Area             
  -  Force Readiness Command 
-  Leadership    -  Commandant’s Initiatives             
  -  Senior Leadership             
  -  Deputy Commandant for Operations             
  -  Deputy Commandant for Mission Support             
  -  Atlantic Area Commander             
  -  Pacific Area Commander             
  -  Reserve             
  -  Auxiliary 
-  Resources    -  CG Support             
  -  Legal      -  JoinCGJAG             
    -  Legal_Assistance        -  Find-A-Legal-Assistance-Lawyer             
      -  FAQ 
  -  Civil Rights             
  -  Work-Life             
  -  Administrative Law Judges      -  Virtual Hearing 
  -  Newsroom             
  -  Family             
  -  Library             
  -  CG Web Mail             
  -  Return 2 Service      -  FAQ 
-  Community    -  Art Program             
  -  Girl Scouts / Boy Scouts      -  Eagle Scout Recognition 
  -  Coast Guard Band             
  -  Coast Guard Cities             
  -  Honor Guard             
  -  JROTC      -  NEWS 
  -  Special Programs      -  Industry Academy        -  Contacts             
      -  2018 
  -  Trademark             
  -  Resources      -  History             
    -  CGC Eagle 
-  Mariners    -  National Vessel Documentation Center             
  -  National Maritime Center             
  -  National Pollution Funds Center      -  NRD        -  NRD_FAQs             
      -  Trustee_Links             
      -  NRD_DOCS             
      -  About_NRD_Funding 
  -  Boating Safety 
-  doing business		 
-  Join		 
-  Recruiting		 
-  contact		 
-  About		 

HomeResourcesAdministrative Law JudgesDecisions2002 ALJ Decisons2001 ALJ Decisions

**ALJ Decisions: 2001**

 

**

                      - FOIA
                      - Privacy Policy
                      - MHS Notice of Privacy Practices
                      - Accessibility
                      - No FEAR
                      - Whistleblower Protection
                      - U.S. Department of Homeland Security
                      - DHS Office of Inspector General
                      - WhiteHouse.gov
                      - USA.gov

### Stay Connected

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5811 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5811

  To amend the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama and Coushatta Indian 
  Tribes of Texas Restoration Act to allow the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo 
  Tribe to determine blood quantum requirement for membership in that 
                                 tribe.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 21, 2010

  Mr. Reyes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama and Coushatta Indian 
  Tribes of Texas Restoration Act to allow the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo 
  Tribe to determine blood quantum requirement for membership in that 
                                 tribe.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BLOOD QUANTUM REQUIREMENT DETERMINED BY TRIBE.

    Section 108(a)(2) of the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama and 
Coushatta Indian Tribes of Texas Restoration Act (25 U.S.C. 1300g-
7(a)(2)) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(2) any person of Tigua Ysleta del Sur Pueblo Indian 
        blood enrolled by the tribe.''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2021113EN.01001401.xml

| 31.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/14

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10173 — Luminus/Essent Belgium)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 113/08)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Luminus S.A. (‘Luminus’, Belgium), controlled by EDF S.A. (‘EDF’, France), |
| --- | --- |

—

Luminus S.A. (‘Luminus’, Belgium), controlled by EDF S.A. (‘EDF’, France),

| — | Essent Belgium NV (‘Essent Belgium’, Belgium), a subsidiary of E.ON S.E. (‘E.ON’, Germany). |
| --- | --- |

—

Essent Belgium NV (‘Essent Belgium’, Belgium), a subsidiary of E.ON S.E. (‘E.ON’, Germany).

Luminus acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Essent Belgium.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | for Luminus: the generation and supply of electricity as well as the supply of gas in Belgium, |
| --- | --- |

—

for Luminus: the generation and supply of electricity as well as the supply of gas in Belgium,

| — | for Essent Belgium: the retail supply of electricity and gas to small industrial and commercial customers and residential customers in Belgium. |
| --- | --- |

—

for Essent Belgium: the retail supply of electricity and gas to small industrial and commercial customers and residential customers in Belgium.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10173 — Luminus/Essent Belgium

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
EXHIBIT
        32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I,
        John
        C. Corey, President and Chief Executive Officer, of Stoneridge, Inc. (the
        “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
        the
        report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
        second quarter ended
        June 30, 2008 (“the Report”) which this certification accompanies fully complies
        with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act
        of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
 
 (2)
        the
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/
                  John C. CoreyJohn
                  C. Corey, President and Chief Executive OfficerAugust
                  7, 2008
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
        Company
        and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
        request.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5804 

To prohibit trade in billfish. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 21, 2010 

Mr. SHADEGG (for himself, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, 

Mr. CAO, and Mr. MARIO DIAZ-BALART of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, 

and in addition to the Committees on Foreign Affairs and Ways and 

Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To prohibit trade in billfish. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Billfish Conservation 

5 Act of 2010’’. 

6 SEC. 2. STATEMENT OF CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY. 

7 The Congress enacts this Act pursuant to clause 3 

8 of section 8 of article I of the United States Constitution. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5804 IH

1 SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON TRADE IN BILLFISH. 

2 (a) PROHIBITION.—No person shall offer for sale, 

3 sell, import, or export, or have custody, control, or posses4 sion of for purposes of offering for sale, selling, importing, 

5 or exporting, billfish or products containing billfish. 

6 (b) PENALTY.—For purposes of section 308(a) of the 

7 Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Manage8 ment Act (16 U.S.C. 1858(a)), a violation of this section 

9 shall be treated as an act prohibited by section 307 of 

10 that Act (16 U.S.C. 1857). 

11 (c) BILLFISH DEFINED.—In this section the term 

12 ‘‘billfish’’— 

13 (1) means any fish of the species— 

14 (A) Makaira nigricans (blue marlin); 

15 (B) Kajikia audax (striped marlin); 

16 (C) Istiompax indica (black marlin); 

17 (D) Istiophorus platypterus (sailfish); 

18 (E) Tetrapturus angustirostris (shortbill 

19 spearfish); 

20 (F) Kajikia albida (white marlin); 

21 (G) Tetrapturus georgii (roundscale spear22 fish); 

23 (H) Tetrapturus belone (Mediterranean 

24 spearfish); and 

25 (I) Tetrapturus pfluegeri (longbill spear26 fish); and 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5804 IH

1 (2) does not include the species Xiphias gladius 

2 (swordfish). 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Swissray International, Inc.(the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Ruedi G. Laupper, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


By:\S\ Ruedi G. Laupper
---------------------------
Ruedi G. Laupper, Chairman of the
Board of Directors, President and
Chief Executive Officer

November 19, 2002
**Exhibit 15.1**

Securities and Exchange Commission 

100 F Street N.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20549 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We were previously principal accountants for China Mobile Limited and, under the date of March 14, 2013, we reported on the consolidatedfinancial statements of China Mobile Limited and its subsidiaries as of and for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012 and the effectiveness of China Mobile Limited and its subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as ofDecember 31, 2012. On March 14, 2013, we were notified that the auditor-client relationship between KPMG and China Mobile Limited will be ceased upon completion of the audit of China Mobile Limited and its subsidiaries’ consolidatedfinancial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012 and effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, and the issuance of our reports thereon. On April 25, 2013 we completed our auditand issued our reports that were included in the Company’s Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012. 

We have read ChinaMobile Limited’s statements included under Item 16F of its annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012, and we agree with such statements, except that we are not in a position to agree or disagree with thestatement that: “During the two fiscal years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012 and through March 14, 2013, neither we nor any person on our behalf consulted with PwC regarding either (i) the application of accounting principles toa specific completed or proposed transaction or regarding the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on our financial statements and no written or oral advice was provided that PwC concluded was an important factor considered by us in reachinga decision as to the accounting, auditing or financial reporting issues, or (ii) any matter being the subject of disagreement (as defined in Item 16F(a)(1)(iv) of Form 20-F) or reportable event (as defined in Item 16F(a)(1)(v) of Form20-F).” 

Very truly yours, 

/s/ KPMG 

Hong Kong, China 

April 25, 2013
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, John
C. Corey, President and Chief Executive Officer, of Stoneridge, Inc. (the
“Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  the
report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the third quarter ended September 30,
2010 (the “Report”) which this certification accompanies fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and





(2)  the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ John C. CoreyJohn
      C. Corey, President and Chief Executive OfficerOctober
      26, 2010





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### PITCHER v. LENNON.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

December 22, 1896.)

Action by Clair Pitcher against William F. Lennon.

No opinion. Motion denied. See 38 N. Y. Supp. 1007.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                Exhibit 11.1


                                HOT TOPIC, INC.

                STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    Fiscal years ended
                                        -------------------------------------------
                                        January 28,     February 3,     February 1,
                                           1995            1996             1997
                                        ------------    ------------    -----------
<S>                                     <C>             <C>             <C>
Net income                              $  291,921      $  436,330      $2,570,418
                                        ==========      ==========      ==========

Computation of common and
  common equivalent shares
  outstanding:

  Common shares                            764,000         764,000       1,320,453
  Options and Warrants                      15,132          53,369         218,452

Conversion of Redeemable Preferred
  Shares into Common Shares              1,115,257       1,453,073       2,305,892
  Shares related to SAB No. 83             867,213         867,213              --
                                        ----------      ----------      ----------

Shares used in computing
  net income per share                   2,761,602       3,137,655       3,844,797
                                        ==========      ==========      ==========

Net income per share                         $0.11           $0.14           $0.67
                                        ==========      ==========      ==========
</TABLE>
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Coast GuardU.S. Department of Homeland Security

Search
Search

Search

-  Home    -  News Room             
  -  Reserve             
  -  Forcecom             
  -  Operations             
  -  Mission Support             
  -  Atlantic Area             
  -  Pacific Area             
  -  History 
-  Units    -  Organization             
  -  Coast Guard A to Z             
  -  Atlantic Area             
  -  Pacific Area             
  -  Force Readiness Command 
-  Leadership    -  Commandant’s Initiatives             
  -  Senior Leadership             
  -  Deputy Commandant for Operations             
  -  Deputy Commandant for Mission Support             
  -  Atlantic Area Commander             
  -  Pacific Area Commander             
  -  Reserve             
  -  Auxiliary 
-  Resources    -  CG Support             
  -  Legal      -  JoinCGJAG             
    -  Legal_Assistance        -  Find-A-Legal-Assistance-Lawyer             
      -  FAQ 
  -  Civil Rights             
  -  Work-Life             
  -  Administrative Law Judges      -  Virtual Hearing 
  -  Newsroom             
  -  Family             
  -  Library             
  -  CG Web Mail             
  -  Return 2 Service      -  FAQ 
-  Community    -  Art Program             
  -  Girl Scouts / Boy Scouts      -  Eagle Scout Recognition 
  -  Coast Guard Band             
  -  Coast Guard Cities             
  -  Honor Guard             
  -  JROTC      -  NEWS 
  -  Special Programs      -  Industry Academy        -  Contacts             
      -  2018 
  -  Trademark             
  -  Resources      -  History             
    -  CGC Eagle 
-  Mariners    -  National Vessel Documentation Center             
  -  National Maritime Center             
  -  National Pollution Funds Center      -  NRD        -  NRD_FAQs             
      -  Trustee_Links             
      -  NRD_DOCS             
      -  About_NRD_Funding 
  -  Boating Safety 
-  doing business		 
-  Join		 
-  Recruiting		 
-  contact		 
-  About		 

HomeResourcesAdministrative Law JudgesDecisionsALJ Decisions 2013

**ALJ Decisions: 2013**

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

    

**

                      - FOIA
                      - Privacy Policy
                      - MHS Notice of Privacy Practices
                      - Accessibility
                      - No FEAR
                      - Whistleblower Protection
                      - U.S. Department of Homeland Security
                      - DHS Office of Inspector General
                      - WhiteHouse.gov
                      - USA.gov

### Stay Connected

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: TEXAS FARMERS 

INSURANCE COMPANY,

 Relator.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-13-00120-CV

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Texas Farmers Insurance Company, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus

against the Honorable Angie Juarez Barill, Judge of the 346th District Court of El Paso County 

Texas. Relator asks the Court to issue a writ of mandamus requiring Respondent: (1) to vacate 

her orders denying a plea in abatement and a motion to compel appraisal, as well as her orders

denying Relator’s motions to reconsider; and (2) to order appraisal and sever the extracontractual claims from the breach of contract claim, and/or abate the extra-contractual claims 

until the breach of contract claim is fully resolved.

To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must meet two requirements. First, the 

relator must show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion. In re Prudential Insurance 

Company of America, 148 S.W.3d 124, 135 (Tex. 2004). Second, the relator must demonstrate 
- 2 -

that there is no adequate remedy by appeal. In re Prudential Insurance Company of America, 

148 S.W.3d at 135-36. Based on the record before us, we conclude that Relator has not 

established it is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is 

denied. See TEX.R.APP.P. 52.8(a).

October 18, 2013

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.