alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# USCIS Lockbox Filing Locations Chart for Certain Family-Based Forms

Use this table to determine which USCIS lockbox you should send certain **family-based forms** based on your reason for filing, eligibility category, and where you live.

We specify the eligibility categories that use these addresses on the following pages:
                - Direct Filing Addresses for Form I-130, Petition for Alien Relative
                - Direct Filing Addresses for Form I-131, Application for Travel Document
                - Direct Filing Addresses for Form I-360, Immigrant Petition for Amerasian, Widow(er) or Special Immigrant
                - Direct Filing Addresses for Form I-485, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status
                - Direct Filing Addresses for Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization
                - Direct Filing Addresses for Form I-824, Application for Action on an Approved Application or Petition
                - I-864, Affidavit of Support Under Section 213A of the INA

Applications and petitions that are not mailed to the appropriate filing location may experience processing delays.

**E-Notification:**If you want to receive an email and/or a text message that we have accepted your form, complete Form G-1145, E-Notification of Application/Petition Acceptance, and attach it to the first page of your application or petition.

03/30/2023

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of January 31, 2006



 EXHIBIT 10.1 

 

 









 

 









 

 









 

 









 

 









 

 









 

 









 

 









 

 









 

 









 

 









 

 









 

 









 

 









 

 









 

 









 

 









 

 









 

 









 

 









 

 









 

 









 

 









 

 









 

 









 

 









 

 









 

 









 

 









 

 









 

 









 

 









 

 









 

 









 

 









 

 









 

 









 

 









 

 









 

 









 

 








 .
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


                              BEST SOFTWARE, INC.
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              THREE MONTHS ENDED              SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                                  SEPTEMBER 30                  SEPTEMBER 30
                                                          --------------------------      --------------------------
                                                              1997           1996             1997           1996
                                                          -----------    -----------      -----------    -----------
                                                           UNUADITED      UNUADITED        UNUADITED      UNUADITED
 <S>                                                          <C>            <C>              <C>            <C>       
 Weighted average common shares outstanding                    7,436          6,533            7,219          6,531    
 Common stock equivalents:                                                                                             
     Preferred stock                                             625            625              625            625    
     Dilutive effect of Stock options and warrants               946          1,670            1,228          1,670    
     Warrant exercise                                             87             87               87             87    
 Assumed common share issuance for dividends in excess           487            487              487            487    
 of earnings                                              ----------     ----------       ----------     ----------
                                                                                                                       
 Pro forma weighted average  shares outstanding                9,581          9,402            9,646          9,400    
                                                          ==========     ==========       ==========     ==========
                                                                                                                       
 Net income                                                   $1,095         $1,122           $1,445         $1,202    
                                                          ==========     ==========       ==========     ==========
                                                                                                                       
 Pro forma net income per share                                $0.11          $0.12            $0.15          $0.13    
                                                          ==========     ==========       ==========     ==========
</TABLE>




                                                                              
                                      21
EXHIBIT 32.1
                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO\
                 13 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report of Enviro Voraxial Technology,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Alberto DiBella, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
13 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: August 11, 2004


/s/ Alberto DiBella
-------------------
Alberto DiBella
Chief Executive Officer
#### In re: ADVANCED TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORK, INC. Debtor. Daniel W. Allen, David D. Allen, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Advanced Telecommunication Network Inc., Defendant-Appellee, *858Advanced Telecommunication Network Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel W. Allen, David D. Allen, Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 10-14307, 10-14308.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

June 8, 2011.

Phillip M. Hudson, III, Hilda Piloto, Arnstein & Lehr, LLP, Miami, FL, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Jason H. Baruch, Roberta A. Colton, Trenam Kemker, Tampa, FL, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before EDMONDSON and MARCUS, Circuit Judges, and LAWSON,* District Judge.

*

Honorable Hugh Lawson, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Georgia, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

In this bankruptcy case, Daniel W. Allen and David D. Allen (collectively, “the Al-lens”) appeal the district court’s August 31, 2010 order dismissing the Allens’ appeal of the bankruptcy court’s January 15, 2010 final judgment in favor of Advanced Telecommunication Network, Inc. The district court found that the settlement agreement executed by the parties in 2005 barred the Allens from appealing the bankruptcy court’s January 15, 2010 final judgment. The Allens argue that the district court erred in dismissing their appeal because the language of the settlement agreement is ambiguous and can be interpreted in a manner that would allow their appeal to proceed. After thorough review, we affirm the district court’s well-reasoned order dated August 31, 2010 dismissing the Allens’ appeal because the language of the settlement agreement is unambiguous and bars the Allens from appealing the bankruptcy court’s January 15, 2010 final judgment.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                             699
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       99
<ALLOWANCES>                                        15
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   854
<PP&E>                                              27
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     965
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              145
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                         816
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       965
<SALES>                                            104
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   121
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      338
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (217)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (217)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (217)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.01

The following certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by
reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any filings.

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SigmaTel, Inc., a Delaware corporation, for the period ended June 30, 2007 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, each of the undersigned officers of SigmaTel,
Inc. certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his respective knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SigmaTel, Inc.
for the periods presented therein.

Date: August 9, 2007



/s/ Phillip E. PompaPhillip E. PompaChief Executive Officer


Date: August 9, 2007



/s/ R. Scott SchaeferR. Scott SchaeferChief Financial Officer


A signed original of the above certification has been provided to SigmaTel, Inc. and will be retained by
SigmaTel, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 02-20

IN RE: RECALL OF RETIRED JUDGE

O R D E R

 Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7257(b)(1), eligible retired Judges of the Court may be recalled 

by the Chief Judge when further service is needed by the Court. Retired Judge William A. 

Moorman, having complied with 38 U.S.C. § 7257, is designated a recall-eligible retired Judge. The 

Chief Judge of the Court has determined that, if recalled, Judge Moorman would provide substantial 

service necessary to meet the needs of the Court.

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that, effective January 2, 2020, through December 31, 2020, recall-eligible retired 

Judge Moorman is recalled from retired status in accordance with 38 U.S.C. § 7257(b)(1). Judge 

Moorman shall have and exercise all the judicial powers and duties of the office of a Judge in active 

service and shall otherwise perform substantial service for the Court as requested by the Chief Judge. 

It is further

ORDERED that Judge Moorman shall serve in recalled status in calendar year 2020 to review 

and decide appeals, motions, and other filings with the Court and to perform other substantial service 

at the request of the Chief Judge and he shall so serve throughout the calendar year for up to 90 days 

or its equivalent. With his consent, Judge Moorman's service may be extended beyond 90 days.

DATED: January 2, 2020 BY THE COURT:

MARGARET BARTLEY

 Chief Judge
# Green Card for a Lautenberg Parolee

A provision of the Lautenberg Amendment to the Foreign Operations Appropriations Act previously allowed certain religious minorities from the former Soviet Union, Estonia, Latvia, or Lithuania who were denied refugee status and subsequently paroled into the United States on a humanitarian basis to apply for lawful permanent resident status (Green Card) after acquiring one year of physical presence in the United States, without regard to visa availability.

This provision expired after Sept. 30, 2011 and USCIS announced in July 2011 that it had stopped authorizing parole for new applicants under the program to ensure that all individuals who were authorized parole under this program would be able to travel to the United States by the deadline. Though the Lautenberg program was later renewed by Congress, USCIS, as a matter of policy, has not re-started the parole program. Individuals who had been offered parole under this provision were required to arrive in the United States by Sept. 30, 2011, though this deadline to travel was later extended to September 30, 2012.

You may be eligible to apply for a Green Card (permanent residence) as a Lautenberg parolee if:
                    - You are or were a national of the former Soviet Union
                    - You were inspected and paroled into the United States as a Lautenberg parolee
                    - You have been physically present in the United States for at least 1 year
                    - You must be physically present in the United States at the time of filling
                    - You are admissible to the United States

To apply for a Green Card, you will need to file Form I-485, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status.

The following evidence should be submitted with Form I-485:
                    - Two passport-style photos
                    - Copy of government issued photo identification
                    - Copy of birth certificate
                    - Copy of passport page with parole stamp
                    - Form I-693, Report of Medical Exam and Vaccination Record
                    - Copy of Form I-94, Entry/Exit Record
                    - Evidence of former or current Soviet nationality
                    - Evidence of denied refugee status (This may already be in your immigration file but you may submit copies of any document you have to establish your eligibility)
                    - Applicable fees
                    - Certified copies of court records (if you have ever been arrested)

Generally, when you have a pending Form I-485, it is possible for you to apply for authorization to work in the United States and to seek advance parole (advance permission to travel and be admitted to the United States upon your return). For further information, see our Employment Authorization Document and Travel Documents pages.

11/27/2017

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
CHECK LIST OF INFORMATION REQUIRED WHEN FILING YOUR CLAIM 

WITH THE MILITARY CLAIMS OFFICE FOR LOSS OR DAMAGE TO 

HOUSEHOLD GOODS (PLEASE INCLUDE WITH YOUR CLAIM PACKAGE)

The following information and documentation is required by the Military Claims Office 

when filing your claim. If you choose not to file your claim in DPS you must include a 

signed Waiver of Full Replacement Value (FRV) Form with your claim. This form can 

be printed on our website. Make a copy of your claim including all documents for your 

own records. Initial each line to verify the items you have included with your claim. 

YOUR CLAIM MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE WITHIN TWO YEARS 

FROM THE DATE OF DELIVERY. THIS REQUIREMENT IS STATUTORY AND 

CANNOT BE WAIVED. The DD Form 1840/1840R, Form 1850/1851, or Notice of 

Loss or Damage Form you submitted within (75 Days) is NOT your claim; it is 

Notification of Loss or Damage to the Transportation Service Provider (TSP)/Carrier. 

1. ______ the Checklist 

2._______DD Form 1842 (Complete sections 1 through 18).

4. ______ Valid Power of Attorney (if you are not the military member) if applicable.

5. ______ DD Form 1844 (Complete blocks 1 through 13, omit block 12) 

6._______Replacement costs for each item (Items with a replacement cost of $100 or

 more can be provided from Internet, Catalogs etc.).

7. Privately Owned Vehicle (POV) claims require ONE Estimate of Repair. 

8. _ Label the supporting documentation such as (Pictures, 

9. Replacement Cost, Proof of Value) you are providing with the relevant line 

 item number for each item claimed on the DD Form 1844. 

10. _____ 1 clear full view picture of claimed item and 1 clear picture of the visible 

damage to the claimed item. 

11. _____ DD Form 1840/1840R, 1850/1851 or Notice of Loss or Damage Form

12. _____ All inventory sheets (originals) received from the carrier (if possible provide 

 the copy received at delivery). 

13. _____ Copy of Travel Orders and Amendments related to the HHG shipment

I understand that if any of the required information is missing, my claim will be delayed 

until I provide all required documents to the Military Claims Office. I understand that I 

cannot dispose of any damaged or destroyed items with the exception of (broken glass or 

hazardous items) until I contact the Military Claims Office and confirm the items do not 

need to be held for salvage by the TSP/Carrier. Do Not dispose of figurines, antiques, or 

crystal with a value in excess of $50.00.

____________________________________ _____________________ 

CLAIMANT DATE
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 13-10

IN RE: COURT CLOSED ON FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2010; THURSDAY, DECEMBER 23, 2010; AND

THURSDAY, DECEMBER 30, 2010

O R D E R

By direction of the Chief Judge, the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims will

be closed on Friday, November 26, 2010; Thursday, December 23, 2010; and Thursday, December

30, 2010.

For purposes of computation of time and motions to enlarge time under the Court's Rules of

Practice and Procedure, Friday, November 26, 2010; Thursday, December 23, 2010; and Thursday,

December 30, 2010, will be considered days when the Clerk's Office has been closed. See U.S.VET.

APP. R. 26(a)(1).

DATED: November 1, 2010 FOR THE COURT:

/s/Gregory O. Block

GREGORY O. BLOCK

Clerk of the Court
CERTIFICATION
                                       OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                       AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, Michael Chou, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form
10-KSB of C&D Production Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of C&D Production Inc.

      I, Rachel Lin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form
10-KSB of C&D Production Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of C&D Production Inc.

By:  /s/ Michael Chou
     ---------------------------------------
     Michael Chou
     Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and
     Chairman of the Board

By:  /s/ Chien-Te Chou
     ---------------------------------------
     Chien-Te Chou
     Administrative and Financial Manager,
     Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has deter mined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 95-20993 Summary Calendar

_____________________
In the Matter of: RHI HOLDINGS, INC.; HILLTOP DEVELOPERS,

Debtors,

_______________________________________________

BARRY G. HITTNER Appellee,

versus

SAMMY JO REEDER,

Appellant.

________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

(CA-H-95-3296)

________________________________________________
June 25, 1996 Before DAVIS, JONES and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Sammy Jo Reeder appeals the district court's affirmance of the

dismissal by the bankruptcy court of her objection to the claim by

American Universal Insurance Company in the Chapter 11 bankruptcy

proceeding of RHI Holdings, Inc. Pursuant to our de novo review,

we conclude that Reeder's objection was properly dismissed, becauseshe does not have a pecuniary interest in the distribution of RHI's

estate and is not a party in interest under the Bankruptcy Code, 11

U.S.C. §§ 502(a) & 1109(b). Reeder is neither a creditor nor a

shareholder of RHI. (We note that the identical objection filed

jointly with Reeder by Interstate Und erground Warehouse &

Industrial Park, Inc., of whi ch she is the sole shareholder,

remains (was not dismissed), because RHI had scheduled Interstate

as a creditor.) For essentially the reasons stated by the district

court, the judgment is

AFFIRMED.