alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Combined
Unconsolidated Balance Sheet and Statement of Income found on pages 7 & 8 of the
company's Form 10-Q for the three months ending December 31, 1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such combined unconsolidated financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             488,000 
<SECURITIES>                                             0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,102,000 
<ALLOWANCES>                                        55,000 
<INVENTORY>                                      8,177,000 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,185,000 
<PP&E>                                           3,767,000 
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,638,000 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,120,000 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,558,000 
<BONDS>                                                  0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0 
<PREFERRED>                                              0 
<COMMON>                                             3,000 
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,547,000 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,120,000 
<SALES>                                         19,850,000 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,850,000 
<CGS>                                           15,032,000 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,307,000 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (790,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (316,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,437,000 
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,110,000 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,327,000 
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0 
<CHANGES>                                                0 
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,327,000 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
#### Daniel Lake and Reuben Vankirk *against*Benjamin Merrill.

CERTIORARI.

If judgment is rendered for a sum exceeding the amount mentioned in the state of demand, the judgment will be reversed.

*342By the Court.

The sum demanded by the plaintiff in the state of demand filed before the justice is $37.92, and judgment was rendered on the appeal in his favor for a larger sum $40.04 debt besides costs. On this ground the judgment was reversed in *Hawk*v. *Anderson,*4 *Halst.*319.

Judgment reversed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
    (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (a) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED
                                   SATES CODE)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of China BAK Battery, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify that:

Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,
2004 (the "Periodic Report") of the Company fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 780(d)) and the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

                                        CHINA BAK BATTERY, INC.

Date: February 9, 2006                  By: /s/ Xiangqian Li
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Xiangqian Li
                                            Chairman, President,
                                            Chief Executive Officer and Director
                                            (Principal Executive Officer)


Date: February 9, 2006                  By: /s/ Yongbin Han
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Yongbin Han
                                            Chief Financial Officer,
                                            Secretary, and Treasurer
                                            (Principal Financial and
                                             Accounting Officer)

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Act and is not being filed as part of the Periodic Report or as a separate
disclosure document

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to China BAK Battery, Inc. and will be retained by China BAK Battery,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 262 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 262

 To amend the Controlled Substances Act so as to exempt real property 
from civil forfeiture due to medical marijuana-related conduct that is 
                        authorized by State law.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2015

   Ms. Lee introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy 
    and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Controlled Substances Act so as to exempt real property 
from civil forfeiture due to medical marijuana-related conduct that is 
                        authorized by State law.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``States' Medical Marijuana Property 
Rights Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress makes the following findings:
            (1) Eighteen States and the District of Columbia have, 
        through ballot measure or legislative action, approved the use 
        of marijuana for medical purposes when recommended by a 
        physician.
            (2) Marijuana has long-established medical uses as an 
        effective treatment for conditions that include HIV/AIDS, 
        multiple sclerosis, arthritis, gastro-intestinal disorders, 
        chronic pain, and others as well.

SEC. 3. CIVIL FORFEITURE EXEMPTION FOR MARIJUANA FACILITIES AUTHORIZED 
              BY STATE LAW.

    Paragraph (7) of section 511(a) of the Controlled Substances Act 
(21 U.S.C. 881(a)(7)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(7) All'' and inserting ``(7)(A) Except 
        as provided in subparagraph (B), all''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(B) No real property, including any right, title, and 
        interest in the whole of any lot or tract of land and any 
        appurtenances or improvements, shall be subject to forfeiture 
        under subparagraph (A) due to medical marijuana-related conduct 
        that is authorized by State law.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 20965]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9762]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice of Intent to File Application for a New License

April 13, 2000.
    Take notice that the following notice of intent has been filed with 
the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Type of filing: Notice of Intent to File an Application for New 
License.
    b. Project No.: 2067.
    c. Date filed: July 30, 1999.
    d. Submitted By: Oakdale Irrigation District and Sam Joaquin 
Irrigation District, current licensees.
    e. Name of Project: Tulloch.
    f. Location: On the Stanislaus River in Tuolumne and Calaveras 
Counties, California.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Section 15 of the Federal Power Act, 18 CFR 
16.6.
    h. Pursuant to Section 16.19 of the Commission's regulations, the 
licensee is required to make available the information described in 
Section 16.7 of the regulations. Such information is available from the 
licensee at Tri-Dam Project, 31885 Old Strawberry Road, Strawberry, 
California 95375. Interested parties can contact Steve Felte on (209) 
965-3996.
    i. FERC Contact: Hector M. Perez, (202) 219-2843, hector.perez@ 
ferc.fed.us.
    j. Expiration Date of Current License: December 31, 2004.
    k. The project consists of a dam and reservoir, a penstock, a 
powerhouse with an installed capacity of 8,550 kilowatts, and a 
switchyard.
    l. The licensee states its unequivocal intent to submit an 
application for a new license for Project No. 2067. Pursuant to 18 CFR 
16.9(b)(1) each application for a new license and any competing license 
applications must be filed with the Commission at least 24 months prior 
to the expiration of the existing license. All applications for license 
for this project must be filed by December 31, 2002.
    m. A copy of the notice of intent is available for inspection and 
reproduction at the Commission's Public Reference Room, located at 888 
First Street, NE, Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426, or by calling (202) 
208-1371. The notice may be viewed on http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call (202) 208-2222 for assistance). A copy is also available 
for inspection and reproduction at the address in item h above.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-9762 Filed 4-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Maude Sutherland, an Infant, by Her Mother and Natural Guardian, Hester Sutherland et al., Respondents, v City of New York et al., Appellants.

The facts in this case are set forth in the opinion of this court (107 AD2d 568, *affd*66 NY2d 800, 802, on the sole ground that "the Appellate Division had the power to reinstate the natural parent as guardian ad litem.”).

Thereafter, it was contendéd at the Supreme Court by the defendants that the matter had been settled for the lump sum, but the court refused to approve a lump-sum settlement. We affirm solely on the basis that no binding settlement had been entered into among the parties. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Ross, Carro and Asch, JJ.
March 17, 2009
  Paul
Smyth (“Executive”)
 5221
North O’Connor Blvd., Suite 600
 Irving,
TX 75039
  RE:
            Amendment
      to Executive Employment Agreement
  Dear
Paul:
  On
January 1, 2007, you and Centerline Capital Group, Inc.(the “Company”)
entered into an Executive Employment Agreement (the
“Agreement”).  Pursuant to Section 10(b) of the Agreement, the
Agreement may be amended by a written instrument signed by the Executive and the
Company. The parties hereto wish to amend the Employment Agreement as provided
herein.
  THEREFORE,
the parties, intending to be legally bound, agree as follows:
  1.       Amendment
of Agreement.  Section 3,
entitled Compensation
and Benefits, shall be amended to increase base salary from $300,000 to
$350,000 effective March 9, 2009.   Section 2, entitled Duties, shall be
amended to change the title from Senior Managing Director to Executive Managing
Director.
  2.       Effect of
Amendment.The parties herby
agree and acknowledge that except as provided in this Amendment, the Agreement
remains in full force and effect and has not been modified in any other
respect.
  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
parties have executed this Agreement, Centerline Capital Group, Inc. and
Centerline Holding Company acting by their respective duly authorized officers,
effective as of the Effective Date.
   CENTERLINE
      CAPITAL GROUP, INC.
            
            EXECUTIVE:By
            /s/
      Marc. D. Schnitzer
            
            /s/
      Paul SmythName:
            Marc
      D. Schnitzer
            
            Name:
            Paul
      SmythTitle:
            President
            
            
            Executive
      Managing DirectorCENTERLINE
      HOLDING COMPANYBy
            /s/
      Marc. D. SchnitzerName:
            Marc
      D. SchnitzerTitle:
            President
DISMISSED; Opinion Filed April 13, 2020

In t he 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05

- 19

- 00910

- CV
IN RE TRAWAYNE GEORG E , Appellant On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF

- 19

- 10285
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Whitehill, Osborne, and Carlyle

Opinion by Justice Carlyle By postcard dated February 14, 2020, we notified appellant the time for filing

a brief had expired. We directed appellant to file a brief and extension motion within ten days and cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. Appellant has not filed a brief, filed an

extension motio n, or corresponded with the Court regarding this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), (c).

190910F.P 05 /Cory L. Carlyle/ CORY L. CARLYLE JUSTICE– 2

– 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

IN RE TRAWAYNE GEORGE, Appellant

No. 05

- 19

- 00910

- CV On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF

- 19

- 10285. Opinion delivered by Justice Carlyle. Justices Whitehill and Osborne participatin g. In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

.
Judgment entered this 13 th day of April, 2020.
#### Annie Burnell, Respondent, v Ocean Gates Associates, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for wrongful eviction and conversion of property, the defendant Ocean Gates Associates appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Williams, J.), dated April 24, 1986, which denied its motion for summary judgment and for leave to amend its answer to include the affirmative defense of release.

Ordered that the order is modified, by deleting the provision thereof which denied that branch of the motion which was for leave to serve an amended answer and substituting therefor a provision granting that branch of the motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, and the appellant’s time to serve its amended answer is extended until 20 days after service upon it of a copy of this decision and order, with notice of entry.

The plaintiff was evicted from her apartment pursuant to a judgment and warrant issued in a summary proceeding for nonpayment of rent. The Civil Court, Kings County, subsequently ordered the defendant landlord Ocean Gates Associates (hereinafter Ocean Gates) to restore the plaintiff to possession after determining that the 72-hour notice of eviction had been improperly served by the defendant marshal. In this action, *inter alia,*for damages for wrongful eviction and conversion of property, Ocean Gates sought summary judgment based on the general rule that a landlord is not liable for the manner in which a marshal executes a valid warrant *(see, Campbell v Maslin,*91 AD2d 559, *affd*59 NY2d 722). However, the matters raised in the plaintiff’s pleadings are sufficient to establish the existence of triable issues of fact with respect to her claim. Therefore, the denial of summary judgment was proper *(see, GTF Mktg. v Colonial Aluminum Sales,*66 NY2d 965). The issues in dispute include whether Ocean Gates was responsible for the actions of the defendant *moving*company, particularly with respect to the failure to return the plaintiff’s belongings once the Civil Court determined that the eviction was improper, and whether, in fact, Ocean Gates ratified the marshal’s actions.

*243That portion of Ocean Gates’ motion which was to amend its answer to include a defense of release should have been granted since the plaintiff failed to present any evidence of prejudice or surprise as a result of the delay in seeking to amend its answer *(see, McCaskey, Davies & Assocs. v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp.,*59 NY2d 755). Although leave to amend need not be granted if the proposed defense is devoid of merit *(see, Bobrick v Bravstein,*116 AD2d 682), here there exists a factual dispute as to whether plaintiff, who admittedly had signed the release, subsequently repudiated it. Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Bracken and Brown, JJ., concur.
(October 8, 1987)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jesse White, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Clifford Scott, J.), rendered March 12, 1985, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of two counts of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Penal *562Law § 265.03) and sentencing him to two consecutive indeterminate terms of *IV2*to 15 years, unanimously modified, on the law, on the facts and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of reversing the judgment with respect to the sentence and imposing concurrent indeterminate terms of 7 *V2*to 15 years, and otherwise affirmed.

In our view, although defendant’s conviction involved two related incidents, one on June 29, 1984, when he fired a pistol through the front door of an apartment occupied by Laurene Harley and her family at 559 West 140th Street, and the other on July 1, 1984, when he pointed the same pistol four inches from Laurene Harley’s temple in the vestibule of the building, the imposition of consecutive terms of imprisonment here is unduly harsh and severe. Accordingly, we modify the judgment so as to impose concurrent terms. We reach this conclusion based upon our review of all of the facts and circumstances and with due consideration of the seriousness of the criminal charges and the presentence report.

We have examined defendant’s remaining contentions and find them lacking in merit. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Sandler, Sullivan and Kassal, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6746

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JOHN E. HARGROVE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at 

Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:07-cr-00058-GMG-RWT-1)

Submitted: September 22, 2020 Decided: September 25, 2020

Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John E. Hargrove, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

John E. Hargrove appeals the district court’s order construing Hargrove’s request 

for the court to provide a cost for copies of all transcripts from his criminal case as a motion 

for transcripts and denying that relief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error or abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. United States v. Hargrove, No. 3:07-cr-00058-GMG-RWT-1 (N.D.W. Va. Apr. 8, 

2020). We deny Hargrove’s motion to preclude certain BOP officials from handling or 

processing his legal materials. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 264 

To provide for the issuance of a semipostal to benefit the Peace Corps, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2015 

Ms. LEE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee 

on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide for the issuance of a semipostal to benefit the 

Peace Corps, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Peace Stamp for the 

5 Peace Corps Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PEACE CORPS SEMIPOSTAL. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The United States Postal Service 

8 shall, for a 2-year period beginning no later than 12 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 264 IH

1 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, issue 

2 a semipostal to benefit the Peace Corps. 

3 (b) REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORITIES.—The 

4 issuance of such semipostal and the disposition of the 

5 amounts becoming available from the issuance of such 

6 semipostal shall be governed by section 416 of title 39, 

7 United States Code, subject to the following: 

8 (1) The differential included in the rate of post9 age established for such semipostal under section 

10 416(c) of such title may not exceed 25 percent. 

11 (2) The Peace Corps shall be the sole agency to 

12 which any amounts becoming available from the sale 

13 of such semipostal may be transferred under section 

14 416(d)(1) of such title. 

15 (c) SEMIPOSTAL DEFINED.—For purposes of this 

16 section, the term ‘‘semipostal’’ has the meaning given such 

17 term by section 416(a)(1) of such title. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS