alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Alexandria Phillips, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Advanced Engine
Technologies, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report; and

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

(c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.


Date: May 14, 2004                          /s/ ALEXANDRIA PHILLIPS
                                                Alexandria Phillips, Treasurer
----

#### EXHIBIT 23.1

#### GEORGE STEWART, CPA2301 SOUTH JACKSON STREET, SUITE 101-GSEATTLE, WASHINGTON     98144(206) 328-8554   FAX (206) 328-0383

 

To Whom It May Concern:

The firm of George Stewart, Certified Public Accountant consents to theinclusions of the Financial Statements of Medina Coffee, Inc. as of December 31,2003 and December 31, 2002, in any filings that are necessary now or in the nearfuture with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

| Very truly yours,                                                                      |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|  

/s/ George Stewart, CPA

George Stewart, CPA

  Date: April 12, 2004 |
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5845 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5845

     To authorize 700 incremental vouchers for tenant-based rental 
assistance under section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 to 
help meet the housing needs of low-income families in the Commonwealth 
                    of the Northern Mariana Islands.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 22, 2010

  Mr. Sablan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To authorize 700 incremental vouchers for tenant-based rental 
assistance under section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 to 
help meet the housing needs of low-income families in the Commonwealth 
                    of the Northern Mariana Islands.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN INCREMENTAL SECTION 8 RENTAL ASSISTANCE FOR 
              NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS.

    (a) Provision of Incremental Vouchers.--Subject only to the 
appropriation of sufficient amounts pursuant to subsection (b) of this 
section, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development shall provide 
to the Northern Marianas Housing Corporation tenant-based rental 
housing assistance under section 8(o) of the United States Housing Act 
of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437f(o)) in an amount sufficient to fund 700 
incremental vouchers for fiscal year 2011, and shall renew such 
vouchers in each fiscal year thereafter.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated--
            (1) for fiscal year 2011, such sums as may be necessary to 
        provide the incremental vouchers described in subsection (a); 
        and
            (2) in each fiscal year thereafter, such sums as may be 
        necessary to renew the vouchers described in subsection (a) for 
        that year.
Any amounts appropriated pursuant to this subsection shall remain 
available until expended.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of MathStar, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended
December 31, 2008 (the "Annual Report"), I, Douglas M. Pihl, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|                     |  |     |  |                                                                                        
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|Date: March 31, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/ DOUGLAS M. PIHL Douglas M. Pihl
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

---
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 

U.S. Coast Guard 

LOST CREDENTIAL AFFIDAVIT

CG-5800H (08/14)

Address of Coast Guard Unit

Investigating Officer

Name and Address of Mariner

Coast Guard Enforcement Activity Number:

Type or print name Signature Date

LOST CREDENTIAL AFFIDAVIT

Telephone

, hereby notify the U.S. Coast Guard that I have lost the following listed 

Coast Guard issued Credential(s).

1. I,

2. Circumstances concerning the loss, to the best of my knowledge, and my attempts to find the missing Credentials 

are as follows:

3. I further certify that if this (these), or any other Coast Guard issued Credentials are located, it (they) will be promptly 

surrendered to the Coast Guard.

 Privacy Act Statement 

The legal authority for the collection of information on this form is authorized by 46 U.S.C. Chapter 77 and 33 C.F.R. Part 20. The information provided will be 

used to advocate your position in this administrative proceeding. Unless part of mandatory discovery, submission of the information on this form is voluntary. 

You are solely responsible for the manner in which you want to present your own case. This document will become part of the official record, which can be 

viewed by the public. 33 C.F.R. § 20.903.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, John C. Corey, President and Chief Executive Officer of Stoneridge, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (“the Report”) which this certification accompanies fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and





(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ John C. CoreyJohn C. Corey, President and Chief Executive OfficerMay 9, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
(November 21, 1986)

#### In the Matter of the Application of Richard A. Insogna for Reinstatement as an Attorney.

Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Casey, Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet and Statement of Income found on pages 3 & 4 of the
company's Form 10-Q for the year ending June 30, 1999 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such consolidated financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,103
<SECURITIES>                                       102
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,210
<ALLOWANCES>                                       112
<INVENTORY>                                     15,104
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,876
<PP&E>                                          30,777
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,471
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 118,599
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,203
<BONDS>                                         62,618
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,773
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   118,599
<SALES>                                         35,044
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                35,044
<CGS>                                           28,261
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,674
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    42
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 682
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,646
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,106
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,540
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,540
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.35



</TABLE>
# Update to Form G-1450, Authorization for Credit Card Transactions

#### Archived Content

The information on this page is out of date. However, some of the content may still be useful, so we have archived the page.

New edition dated 08/04/17. Starting 10/13/2017, we will only accept the 08/04/17 edition. Until then, you can use the 08/06/15 edition. 

08/14/2017

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
EXHIBIT
32.1





Certification
of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








I, Jeffry
N. Quinn, Chief Executive Officer of Solutia Inc. (the “Company”), certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that to the best of my knowledge:








(1)
                the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
      ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and(2)
                the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








Dated:
July 28, 2009








By:
                        /s/
      Jeffry N. QuinnJeffry
      N. QuinnPresident,
      Chief Executive Officerand
      Chairman of the Board













A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Solutia Inc. and will be retained by
Solutia Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Salvador Miranda, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kellam, J.), both rendered March 16, 1984, each convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The defendant contends that his recitation of the underlying facts of the crimes charged did not establish the requisite mental culpability to sustain the convictions of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree based upon accessorial liability. Since the defendant did not raise any objections as to the adequacy of the plea allocutions to the court of first instance, he has failed, as a matter of law, to preserve his claim for appellate review *(see, People v Pellegrino,*60 NY2d 636; *People v Pascale,*48 NY2d 997; *People v Santiago,*100 AD2d 857). In any event, the plea allocutions satisfied the standards set forth by the Court of Appeals in *People v Harris*(61 NY2d 9) for establishing that the guilty pleas were entered knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily.

We also reject the defendant’s contention that he was not afforded effective assistance of counsel because counsel permitted him to plead guilty knowing he lacked the capacity to make an informed judgment due to mental retardation. Contrary to the defendant’s contention, however, the results of a CPL article 730 examination and a mental forensic examination conducted at his attorney’s request indicate that the defendant had the capacity to understand the nature of the proceedings and to assist counsel in his defense. While the defendant’s level of intellectual functioning is within the *419lowest limits of the low average range, as evidenced by an over-all intelligence quotient of 81, it was not so deficient as to render him either incompetent to stand trial or incapable of forming the requisite intent to commit the crimes charged. Furthermore, the defendant’s bald, conclusory allegation that defense counsel coered him into pleading guilty is refuted by the record of the plea allocutions *(People v Corwise,*120 AD2d 604). Mangano, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Fiber, JJ., concur.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Robert L. MOFFITT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-11105

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 11, 2011.

Robert L. Moffitt, Beaumont, TX, pro se.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

In April 2006, Robert L. Moffitt, federal prisoner # 33882-177, was convicted of multiple offenses arising out of a drug-trafficking conspiracy and sentenced to a total of 360 months of imprisonment. The conviction and sentence were affirmed on appeal, and his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion was denied. *See United States v. Moffitt,*No. 06-10032 (5th Cir. July 23, 2007); *United States v. Moffitt,*No. 09-10813 (5th Cir. Feb. 17, 2010).

Moffitt filed a motion requesting that the district court order his former trial attorney to provide a copy of his files so *377that Moffitt could prepare a § 2255 motion. The district court denied the motion on the ground that Moffitt has already sought relief under § 2255. Moffitt has appealed.

Before we can reach the merits of this appeal, we must first consider our jurisdiction. “Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction. They possess only that power authorized by Constitution and statute, which is not to be expanded by judicial decree.” *Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am.,*511 U.S. 375, 377, 114 S.Ct. 1673, 128 L.Ed.2d 391 (1994) (citations omitted). This court may only exercise jurisdiction over final orders and certain interlocutory orders. *See*28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 (final orders), 1292 (interlocutory decisions); *Ashcroft v. Iqbal,*— U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1945, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009). As the motion to compel counsel to provide a copy of his files does not fall into any of the above categories, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. *See also*5th Cir. R. 42.2

DISMISSED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### American Bartenders School, Inc., et al., Appellants, v Kevin G. Cahill et al., Respondents.

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Kristin Glen, J.), entered on March 4, 1987, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements, for the reasons stated by Kristin Glen, J. Concur —Sandler, J. P., Sullivan, Ross, Milonas and Wallach, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INFINIUM
SOFTWARE INC'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30,
2000.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          17,774
<SECURITIES>                                     4,677
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,605
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,271
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                51,558
<PP&E>                                          18,972
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,995
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  85,215
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           55,432
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           129
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,177
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    85,215
<SALES>                                         13,442
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                68,019
<CGS>                                            4,887
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,008
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                57,631
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (147)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (19,547)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (6,640)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,907)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,907)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.02)


</TABLE>
#### MARION, Respondent, v. TOWN OF NEWFIELD, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department.

May 18, 1894.)

Action by Ezra Marion against the town of Newfield.

Argued before HARDIN, P. J., and MARTIN and MERWIN, JJ.

No opinion. Judgment and order reversed on the exceptions, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. Held, that the opinion of the witness as to the “safe life of a wooden bridge” was improperly received. See Harley v. Manufacturing Co., 142 N. Y. 31, 36 N. E. 813, and cases cited.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1540

CHARLES GODLOVE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MARTINSBURG SENIOR TOWERS, LP; MILLENNIA HOUSING MANAGEMENT 

LTD.; AMERICAN PRESERVATION BUILDERS LLC,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief 

District Judge. (3:14-cv-00132-GMG-RWT)

Submitted: July 21, 2015 Decided: July 23, 2015

Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Godlove, Appellant Pro Se. Jason S. Murphy, Susan Renee 

Snowden, MARTIN & SEIBERT, LC, Martinsburg, West Virginia; Gregory 

Ernest Kennedy, FRANKLIN & PROKOPIK PC, Martinsburg, West 

Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Charles Godlove appeals the district court’s orders denying 

his motion for appointment of counsel and granting Appellees’ 

motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find 

no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Godlove v. Martinsburg Senior Towers, LP, No. 3:14-cv00132-GMG-RWT (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 30, 3015, Apr. 21, 2015). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Frank J. VISCONI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 2011-5086.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Sept. 1, 2011.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Frank J. Viseoni moves to remand this case to the United States Court of Federal Claims. The United States moves for an extension of time to file its response, and opposes Visconi’s motion to remand. Visconi submits additional documents concerning his arguments in the case.

Visconi’s motion contains arguments that are similar to those presented in his brief, i.e., that the case should be remanded. Visconi’s additional documents also present arguments that should be made in the briefs. Viseoni has not shown in his motion that remand is appropriate at this time.

Accordingly,

*991It Is Ordered That:

(1) Visconi’s motion is denied.

(2) The United States’ motion for an extension of time is granted.