alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021430EN.01000801.xml

| 25.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 430/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 430/8

---

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 430/08)

| Member State | Republic of Croatia |
| --- | --- |
| Route(s) concerned | | Dubrovnik – Zagreb – Dubrovnik |

Member State

Republic of Croatia

Route(s) concerned

Dubrovnik – Zagreb – Dubrovnik

| | Split – Zagreb – Split |
| --- | --- |

Split – Zagreb – Split

| | Zagreb – Zadar – Pula – Zadar – Zagreb |
| --- | --- |

Zagreb – Zadar – Pula – Zadar – Zagreb

| | Zagreb – Brač – Zagreb |
| --- | --- |

Zagreb – Brač – Zagreb

| | Osijek – Dubrovnik – Osijek |
| --- | --- |

Osijek – Dubrovnik – Osijek

| | Osijek – Split – Osijek |
| --- | --- |

Osijek – Split – Osijek

| | Osijek – Zagreb – Osijek |
| --- | --- |

Osijek – Zagreb – Osijek

| | Osijek – Pula – Split – Pula – Osijek |
| --- | --- |

Osijek – Pula – Split – Pula – Osijek

| | Osijek – Rijeka – Osijek |
| --- | --- |

Osijek – Rijeka – Osijek

| | Rijeka – Split – Dubrovnik – Split – Rijeka |
| --- | --- |

Rijeka – Split – Dubrovnik – Split – Rijeka

| | Rijeka – Zadar – Rijeka |
| --- | --- |

Rijeka – Zadar – Rijeka

| | Osijek – Zadar – Osijek |
| --- | --- |

Osijek – Zadar – Osijek

Date of entry into force of the public service obligations

1 May 2022

Address where the text and any information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained

For further information, please contact:

| Ministry of the Sea, Transport and Infrastructure |
| --- |
| Directorate General of Civil Aviation, Electronic Communications and Post |
| Prisavlje 14 |
| 10000 Zagreb |
| REPUBLIC OF CROATIA |

Ministry of the Sea, Transport and Infrastructure

Directorate General of Civil Aviation, Electronic Communications and Post

Prisavlje 14

10000 Zagreb

REPUBLIC OF CROATIA

Tel. +385 16169060

Fax +385 16196393

Email: PSO@caacro.hr

---
#### 106 & 108 Charles LLC, Appellant, v Gabriela Hohn, Respondent.

[946 NYS2d 165]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen A. Rakower, J.), entered June 20, 2011, which denied plaintiff landlord’s mo*512tion for a preliminary injunction, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff seeks a preliminary injunction to: a) require defendant tenant to remove a partition she constructed in her studio apartment; and b) discontinue using the apartment as a part-time professional office for her psychology practice. Because plaintiff’s motion seeks an order mandating specific conduct, plaintiff must show a clear right to relief *(Second on Second Café, Inc. v Hing Sing Trading, Inc.,*66 AD3d 255, 265 [2009] [movant must show that preliminary injunction mandating specific conduct is essential to preserve the status quo]).

The injunction was properly denied as to the renovation. Because defendant submitted unrebutted evidence that the predecessor landlord had consented to the renovation, she successfully raised the defense of waiver *(see Haberman v Hawkins,*170 AD2d 377 [1991]). As such, plaintiff is unlikely to succeed on the merits. Moreover, while plaintiff described hypothetical injury from the renovation, such as possible criminal liability, it failed to establish irreparable harm *(see Dua v New York City Dept. of Parks & Recreation,*84 AD3d 596 [2011]).

The injunction was also properly denied as to the therapy practice. Plaintiff failed to articulate any injury it would suffer as a result of the continuation of the practice. In this connection, we note that the defendant’s use of the apartment was not in violation of the zoning regulations. Concur — Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Moskowitz, Renwick and Abdus-Salaam, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2011 NY Slip Op 31641(U).]
#### Collins *v.*Burton, *et als.*

Appeal from Birmingham City Court.

Tried before the Hon. W. W. Wilkerson.

Lane & White, for appellant.

Georoe A. Evans and D. J. Ponceler, for appellee.

This action ivas brought by the appellant against the appellees on a 'constable’s bond, -claiming -damages for a levy made by the constable up-on property upon which the plaintiff -claimed a lien under a recorded judgment. The -case was tried by the -court below without the intervention of a jury, and a judgment was rendered in favor o-f the defendants.

The plaintiff’s right -of action is based upon the validity of the lien asserted in the -complaint. Without a lien there is no pretence -o-f a right -of -action. The registry of the judgment under which the lien is claimed *698failed to state the name of the owner of the judgment. The court holds that this was prerequisite to the creation of a lien under the statute authorizing the registry of .judgments or decrees. — See *Duncan v.*Ashcraft, 121 Ala. 552. The plaintiff having no lien upon the property in question was not entitled to a judgment under any phase of the case.

The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Opinion by

Dowdell, J.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

KEITH BAXTER ALEXANDER,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 

 State.

 

§

§

§

 

§

§

§ 

 

§

'

'

No. 08-14-00102-CR

Appeal from the

371st Judicial District Court

of Tarrant County, Texas 

(TC# 1337633D)

 O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s third motion for extension of time to file the brief 

until December 9, 2014. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE 

THE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Wm. Reagan Wynn, the Appellant’s Attorney, 

prepare the Appellant’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before December 9, 2014.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of November, 2014.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
ex10-29_f10k12312009.htm


    Exhibit
10.28

     

    
      
                                                 

           

          
            	
                    OIS

                    221
      Lathrop Way, Suite I

                    Sacramento, CA
      95815  

                    USA   

                  	
                    www.oisi.com

                    main 088.338.8436

                    fax 916.646.0207

                     

                  


          

                

        

                    

         

         

         

        
 

        August
31, 2007

        VIA
Facsimile and mail

        


        William
D. Greer

        4805
Nevada Avenue

        Nashville,
TN 37209

        


        


        Re:           Ophthalmic Imaging Systems Board
Membership

        


        


        Dear
Bill:

        


        On behalf
of OIS, the Company’s Board of Directors would like to thank you for accepting
its invitation to join the Board.

        


        We’re
very excited about the prospects and focus of the Company, and look forward to
your input in directing the Company to realize its potential.

        


        The
Company will pay an annual retainer in the amount of $15,000, payable in
4  equal quarterly instalglments of  $3,750 for your
attendance at up to 3 Board meetings per quarter.  For your services
in attending meetings in excess of 3 per quarter, the Company will pay you at
the rate of $100 per hour up to a maximum of $500 per day.

        


        Please
indicate your formal acceptance of the foregoing by signing and dating where
indicated below.  At your earliest convenience, please return via
facsimile the executed copy of page 2 to the attention of Mr. Gil Allon at the
Company’s offices at (916) 646-0207.

        


        Again, we
welcome you and thank you for joining us during this very exciting time for the
Company.

        
 

        Very
truly yours,

        


        /s/ Yigal Berman                                                                        

        Yigal
Berman

        Chairman
of the Board of Directors

        Ophthalmic
Imaging Systems

        


        


        Approved:

        


        /s/ William D. Greer                                                                        

        William
D. Greer

        


        Date :
9/5/07

        


        


        
           

          
            	Better
      Insight.  Better Sight.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Farm Service Agency 

# AGENCY:

Farm Service Agency, USDA. 

# ACTION:

Notice of publication. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given that the Farm Service Agency has published a list of warehouses licensed under the United States Warehouse Act (7 U.S.C. 241*et seq.*) as of December 31, 1999, as required by section 26 of that Act (7 U.S.C. 266). A list of cancellations or terminations that occurred during calendar year 1999 is also available. Interested persons may obtain a copy of either list from the person listed below.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Judy Fry, Farm Service Agency, Warehouse and Inventory Division, U.S. Department of Agriculture, STOP 0553, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-0553, telephone 202-720-3822, or e-mail requests may be sent: Judy_Fry@wdc.fsa.usda.gov. 

Signed at Washington, D.C., on April 10, 2000. 

Keith Kelly, 

Administrator, Farm Service Agency. 

[FR Doc. 00-9450 Filed 4-14-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410-05-P
**Exhibit32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906

 

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002

 

I, Tim Paterson-Brown, Chief Executive Officer ofMedicsight, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of myknowledge:

 

(1)    theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30,2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
|                    | By:    | /s/TIM  PATERSON-BROWN   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|                    |   | Tim  Paterson-Brown      |
|                    |   | Chief  Executive Officer |
| November 10,  2004 |   |

 

E-1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,683
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 9,735
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           2,245
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             2,243
<LOANS>                                         16,764
<ALLOWANCE>                                        205
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,060
<DEPOSITS>                                      26,327
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                176
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,549
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  33,060
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    289
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                   33
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   112
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                   434
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 209
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 218
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              216
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       60
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    215
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      9
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           9
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         6
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     6.3
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   145
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  205
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7763
FRANKIE L. MCCOY, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus A. DIGGS, 4 to 12 a.m. shift commander; J. BACOAT, Sergeant, A-Block duty officer; S. HUTCHSON, Sergeant ,A&B Block duty officer; SERGEANT JOBE ,A&B Block duty officer; UNKNOWN NAMED DEFENDANTS, Each defendant is sued individually and in his official capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-97- 3621-L) Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: May 26, 1998 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Frankie L. McCoy, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant, a Maryland inmate, app eals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the recordand the district court's opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. McCoy v. Diggs , No. CA-97-3621-L (D. Md. Nov. 7, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Form of Letter Agreement with PC owner



 Exhibit 10.12 
 [NAME OF STOCKHOLDER] 
 [ADDRESS OF STOCKHOLDER] 
 [DATE] 
 [NAME OF OPTION HOLDER]

 [ADDRESS OF OPTION HOLDER] 
 Dear
Sirs: 
 The undersigned, [NAME OF STOCKHOLDER] (“Stockholder”) hereby agrees with [NAME OF OPTION HOLDER], a
[                ], (“Option Holder”), as follows: 
 1. In consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) in hand paid to Stockholder by Option Holder, Stockholder hereby grants to Option Holder (or its designee) the irrevocable, unconditional option (the
“P.A. Option”) to purchase from Stockholder all (but not less than all) of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock (the “P.A. Stock”) of
[                    ], a [            ] professional association
(“P.A.”), owned by Stockholder, for a purchase price of [AMOUNT] [$                ]. The P.A. Option shall be exercisable by Option Holder (or its
designee) (i) in the event that the ownership of the P.A. Stock by Stockholder would not violate any law or applicable regulation of the State of
[                    ] or any governmental or regulatory body thereof, or (ii) in the event that Option Holder determines to transfer the P.A.
Stock to a person designated by Option Holder qualified under applicable law and regulations to own the P.A. Stock. Option Holder agrees that the P.A. Option shall be exercised in a manner to ensure that the ownership of the P.A. Stock will not
violate any laws or regulations. Option Holder shall give Stockholder prior notice of the transfer of the P.A. Stock upon exercise of the P.A. Option. 
 2. Option Holder hereby agrees to indemnify Stockholder and to hold him harmless from and against any and all loss, damage, cost or expense (including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys’ fees)
suffered or incurred by Stockholder arising out of any claim relating to his position as a shareholder, director or officer of P.A., as applicable (and not negligence or willful misconduct on the part of Stockholder), of which Stockholder promptly
notifies Option Holder in writing. Option Holder shall have the right to assume the defense of any such indemnified claim and Stockholder shall not settle any such claim without Option Holder’s consent. 
 3. The P.A. Option shall be binding upon Stockholder and his heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, and
upon any assignee or transferee of the P.A. Stock, by operation of law or otherwise. 







 4. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to give to Option Holder a
present ownership interest in the P.A. Stock. 
 If the foregoing accurately sets forth the agreement between us, kindly execute
the enclosed counterpart of this letter in the space indicated below for such purpose and return such signed counterpart to the undersigned, whereupon this letter shall become a binding agreement between us. 
 Very truly yours, 
 [STOCKHOLDER] 
 Agreed and Accepted: 
 [OPTION HOLDER] 
  

			
	
		
	By:
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 7119

ABDU

- SALIM GOULD , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. LESLIE BESS, Shift Sergeant; TRINITRA LEE

- BOONE; CORPORAL AMBROSE; TYRONE PUGH, Dorm Officer , Defendants

- Appellees, and TOWNSHIP OF WINDSOR; BERTIE

- MARTIN COUNTY REGIONAL JAIL BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Terrence W. Boyle , Chief District Judge. ( 5:17

- ct

- 03136

- BO )

Submitted : December 22, 2020 Decided: December 29, 2020

Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Abdu

- Salim Gould, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf Alexander Garcia

- Gallont, James R. Morgan, Jr., WOMBLE BOND DICKINSON (US) LLP, Winston

- Salem, North Carolina,2 for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Abdu

- Salim Gould appeals from the district court’s order denying his motions for change of venue, for recusal of the district court judge, and for entry of judgment in his favor, and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint without prejudice for failure t o exhaust his administrative remedies

. He also appeals from the denial of his motion to alter or amend the judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gould v. Bess , No. 5:17

-
ct

- 03136

- BO (E.D.N.C. July 21, 2020 & Sept. 28, 2020 )

. Additionally, we grant Gould’s motion to seal an exhibit filed in this court, and we deny his remaining pending motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal con tentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. AFFIRMED
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2585 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to eliminate the five-month 

waiting period in the disability insurance program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 1, 2015 

Mr. ISRAEL (for himself and Ms. MICHELLE LUJAN GRISHAM of New Mexico) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to eliminate 

the five-month waiting period in the disability insurance 

program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Sanchez-Young Social 

5 Security Disability Insurance for the Terminally Ill Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF TITLE II WAITING PERIOD FOR 

7 TERMINALLY ILL INDIVIDUALS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 223(a)(1) of the Social 

9 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 423(a)(1)) is amended by adding 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2585 IH

1 at the end the following new sentence: ‘‘In the case of any 

2 application for disability insurance benefits filed by an in3 dividual who is determined to be under a disability and 

4 who is determined to be terminally ill by a primary care 

5 provider (as defined by the individual’s State of residence), 

6 medical specialist, or other qualified provider or with re7 spect to whom the Commissioner has determined would 

8 otherwise suffer undue hardship by application of a wait9 ing period, this paragraph shall be applied without regard 

10 to any waiting period. For the purposes of the preceding 

11 sentence, an individual is considered to be terminally ill 

12 if the individual has a medical prognosis that the individ13 ual’s life expectancy is 12 months or less.’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

15 this section shall take effect with respect to applications 

16 filed after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS