alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-15207, 333-67645, 333-32139, 333-79983,
333-47205 and 333-51328) of CCC Information Services Group, Inc. of our
report dated March 23, 2001, except as to paragraph 3 of Note 15 which is as
of April 17, 2001, relating to the financial statements and financial statement
schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.




PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Chicago, Illinois
April 17, 2001
EXHIBIT 11.1

                        CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSTICS, INC
                       Computations of Earnings Per Share
            (Dollars and shares per thousand, except per share data)
                                  (Unaudited)

                                                       Three Months Ended
                                                     March 31,    March 31,
                                                        1997         1966
                                                       -------      -------

Net Loss                                               ($478)       ($1,113)
                                                       ======       ========
Weighted average number of shares outstanding          6,714          6,538
                                                       ======       ========
Loss per share                                        ($0.07)        ($0.17)
                                                     ========       ========
EXHIBIT 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of American  Southwest  Holdings,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending June 30, 2004,  as filed
with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  (the  Report),  I, Alan  Doyle,
President (Chief Executive Officer) and Treasurer  (Principal Financial Officer)
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the report fully complies
with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:  August 11, 2004



/s/ Alan Doyle
---------------------------------------
Alan Doyle
President (Chief Executive Officer) and
Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In the matter of J.B.

Appellate case number: 01-13-00844-CV

Trial court case number: 2013-02490J

Trial court: 314th District Court of Harris County

We are in receipt of a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certification of the right to 

appeal signed by the trial court Judge on February 13, 2014. As such, we DENY the motion to 

dismiss filed by appellee on December 30, 2013. Appellant’s brief is already on file. Appellee’s 

brief is due within 30 days of the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

X Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: April 10, 2014
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

IN RE: PETITION OF RETIRED JUDGE 

FARLEY TOOTHMAN

PETITION OF: FARLEY TOOTHMAN

:

:

:

:

:

No. 78 EM 2021

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6

th day of December, 2021, the “Petition for Allowance of a 

Subpoena,” seeking this Court’s permission to subpoena the Honorable Gerald R. 

Solomon pursuant to Rule of Judicial Administration 1701, is DISMISSED. 

Rule 1701 specifies that, “[f]or purposes of this rule, judge and magisterial district 

judge includes those judicial officers in active judicial service or senior status.” Pa.R.J.A. 

1701(a). This provision has no apparent application to a subpoena that would be issued 

on Judge Solomon, as that jurist’s term as a senior judge expired on December 31, 2020.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Michael S. Liss, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FiberNet Telecom Group, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 12, 2003
# C_2021398EN.01001601.xml

| 1.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/16

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2021/C 398/11)

1.

As provided for in Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may submit a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury. Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit G-1), CHAR 4/39, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Certain coated fine paper | The People’s Republic of China | Anti-dumping duty | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1188 of 3 July 2017 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain coated fine paper originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council
  (OJ L 171, 4.7.2017, p. 168) | 5.7.2022 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

Certain coated fine paper

The People’s Republic of China

Anti-dumping duty

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1188 of 3 July 2017 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain coated fine paper originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council

(OJ L 171, 4.7.2017, p. 168)

5.7.2022

---

(1)  OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.

1

(2)  TRADE-Defence-Complaints@ec.europa.eu

2

(3)  The measure expires at midnight (00:00) of the day mentioned in this column.

3

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2559 Engrossed in House (EH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2559

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the ``PFC Milton A. Lee Medal of Honor Memorial Highway'' 
                         in the State of Texas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The segment of Interstate Route 10 between milepost 535 and 
milepost 545 at Kendall County, Texas, shall be known and designated as 
the ``PFC Milton A. Lee Medal of Honor Memorial Highway''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the segment of Interstate Route 10 
referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``PFC 
Milton A. Lee Medal of Honor Memorial Highway''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 15, 2015.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2559

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To designate the ``PFC Milton A. Lee Medal of Honor Memorial Highway'' 
                         in the State of Texas.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM OCTOBER 31,
1997 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                           9,335
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,267
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,037)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,679
<PP&E>                                           3,412
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,886)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,205
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,691
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,351
<OTHER-SE>                                     (4,214)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,205
<SALES>                                          4,702
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,533
<CGS>                                              864
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,627
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  10
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,158
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,158
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,158
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04
        

</TABLE>
#### Hampton Andruss, Executor of his own wrong, of Alche Andruss, Appellant *against*Thos. P. Stewart, Appellee.

An appeal bond executed by a minor, (against whom a judgment lias been rendered,) and by a substantial freeholder, is sufficient to sustain an appeal, although, the guardian who was appointed by the justice’s court to defend the suit, did not join in the bond.

*jRyerson*on behalf of Andruss, the appellant, moved for a peremptory mandamus to be directed to the Court of Common Pleas of Warren county, to compel them to reinstate an appeal. He founded his application upon a statement of facts agreed upon by the parties, in the following words: “ It is agreed between the parties that the appeal was dismissed by the Court of Common Pleas, upon the ground that the appeal bond was executed by Hampton Andruss, a minor, *190who appeared before the justice, and defended the suit by Joseph Andruss, his guardian, appointed by the court. It is admitted that the said bond was also executed by Wilson Hunt, a responsible freeholder of the county of Warren, as surety. It is further agreed between the parties to this appeal, that application may be made to the next term of the Supreme Court,, without further notice, for a mandamus. And if the said Supreme Court shall be of opinion that the Court of Common Pleas erred in their decision, that a peremptory mandamus issue to restore the said appeal.”

*Vroom,*contra.

Ch. Justice.

The question is, whether the bond is a substantial compliance with the law. We think it is; for although the infant may not be bound, competent security is given to the appellee — and if with such a bond the appeal be not allowed, the infant may be prevented from appealing altogether, for the guardian is not obliged and may be unwilling to enter into the appeal bond, and thereby render himself liable for the payment of the sum recovered and costs.

Peremptory mandamus ordered.
#### Napoleon B. Barbee v. James Hail et al.

Where the charge of the court was more favorable to the defendant than the evidence warranted, he has no right to complain.

Appeal from Houston. The case was tried before Hon. Reuben A. Reeves, one of the district judges.

The note called for $250, for the hire of a negro woman twelve months, dated 18th January,. 1864, due on the 24th of December thereafter. The defendant proved nothing *162about any promise to receive payment in Confederate money, but did prove that the value of the hire was not over $60. Hpon this he claimed the benefit of the scaling ordinance. The jury found for the amount of the note.

*D. A. Nunn,*for appellants.

Ho brief for the appellee has been furnished to the *Reporter.*

Latimer, J.

—This is a suit founded on a note for $250. Defendant pleaded that the dollars mentioned and called for in the note alluded to Confederate money.

The judge charged the jury that if they believed from the evidence that it was understood by the parties at the time the note was given that the note was to be paid in Confederate money, the plaintiff would be entitled to a verdict for the value in specie of the (Confederate money at the time the note fell due.

As the jury did not find for less than what the note called, it is presumed that they did not consider that the defendant had sustained his plea by the testimony. The charge of the judge was as favorable as the defendant could ask for, and as there is no statement of facts on the question at issue we cannot say that there was any error that the defendant could complain of. The judgment of the court below is

Aeeirmed.

Caldwell, J. and Lindsay, J.

—We concur in the judgment that has been rendered in this case, but dissent from the statement of the case, which gives an implied recognition of the ruling of the court below in receiving evidence to vary the terms of the written contract.
exv4w1






Exhibit 4.1




[Croghan Bancshares, Inc. Letterhead]



March 26, 2010



Securities and Exchange Commission




100 F Street, NE




Washington, D.C. 20549





	 	Re: 	 	 Croghan Bancshares, Inc. — Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2009





Ladies and Gentlemen:




     Croghan Bancshares, Inc., an Ohio corporation (“Croghan”), is today filing with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Croghan for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (“Croghan’s 2009 Form 10-K”).



     Pursuant to the instructions relating to the Exhibits in Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation
S-K, Croghan hereby agrees to furnish to the SEC, upon request, copies of instruments and
agreements defining the rights of holders of long-term debt and of the long-term debt of its
consolidated subsidiary, which are not being filed as exhibits to Croghan’s 2009 Form 10-K.
None of such long-term debt exceeds 10% of the total assets of Croghan and its subsidiaries on a
consolidated basis.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Very truly yours,



CROGHAN BANCSHARES, INC.

 	 
	 	/s/ Kendall W. Rieman
 	 
	 	Kendall W. Rieman 	 
	 	Treasurer
**AMENDMENT
OF RIGHTS AGREEMENT**
  **AND**
  **CERTIFICATION
OF COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 26**
  Pursuant
to Section 26 of the Rights Agreement (“ Agreement ”) dated
July 10, 2003 between Mpower Holding Corporation (the “ Company ”) and
Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company (the “ Rights
Agent ”), the
Company and the Rights Agent hereby amend the Agreement as of December 31, 2004,
as provided below.
  1.  Paragraph
1(a) of the Agreement is hereby amended by adding the following sentence to the
end of the paragraph: “Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this
paragraph, the numeric term “15%” shall be read as “17%” when referring to the
Beneficial Ownership of MCCC ICG Holdings, LLC.”
  The
undersigned officer of the Company, being an appropriate officer of the Company
and authorized to do so by resolution of the board of directors of the Company
dated as of October 21, 2004, hereby certifies to the Rights Agent that these
amendments are in compliance with the terms of Section 26 of the
Agreement.
  Acknowledged
and agreed to this 14 th day of
March, 2005.
 
 **MPOWER HOLDING
      CORPORATION**By:
    /s/ Russell I.
      ZuckermanRussell I. ZuckermanSenior Vice President &
      General Counsel
 
   Acknowledged
and Agreed:
  **CONTINENTAL
      STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY**By:
    /s/ Roger
  BernhammerRoger BernhammerVice
President
Opinion issued July 29, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-13-00513-CR

———————————

CLINTON ANTHONY SUTTON, JR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 412th District Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 68,646

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON PERMANENT ABATEMENT

The State has filed a motion to permanently abate this appeal. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 7.1(a)(2). The State attached to its motion a Certified Abstract of Vital 

Records, which indicates that appellant Clinton Anthony Sutton, Jr. died on May 5, 
2

2014 in Palestine, Anderson County, Texas. The death of an appellant during the 

pendency of an appeal deprives this court of jurisdiction. See Beard v. State, 108 

S.W.3d 304, 304 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). The motion to permanently abate the 

appeal is granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 7.1(a)(2).

Therefore, we order the appeal in trial court cause number 68,646 

permanently abated. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Bland, and Massengale.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Southern Peru Copper Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Oscar González Rocha, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|                      | /s/ Oscar González Rocha         |
|---------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                      | Oscar González Rocha             |
|                      | President and Chief Executive Officer |
| Date: August 5, 2005 |                                  |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been provided to Southern Peru Copper Corporation and will be retained by Southern Peru Copper Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Southern Copper Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Oscar Gonzalez Rocha, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)                 The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|                   | /s/ OSCAR GONZALEZ ROCHA               |
|-------------------|----------------------------------------|
|              | Oscar Gonzalez  Rocha                  |
|              | President and  Chief Executive Officer |
| Date: May 9, 2007 |                                   |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been provided to Southern Copper Corporation and will be retained by Southern Copper Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----