alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Aspinall Operations Meeti

August 18, 2016
SPRING RUNOFF
84% of seasonal 
610

640 620

580

530 515 515 525 560 580 600 6

755 785 770

710

650 640 635 632 675 690 715 

0

100200300400500600700800900

1000110012001300140015001600

Jan 1st Feb 1st Feb 15th Mar 1st Mar 15th Apr 1st Apr 15th May 1st May 15th Jun 1st Jun 15th J

Apr - July Forecasted Inflow (1000 ac-ft)

Forecast Date

Aspinall Unit

Forecasted Unregulated Inflow

Blue Mesa Inflow Crystal Inflow

Bar labels are forecast

in 1000 ac-ft
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 120% 

Percent of 1981-2010 Average

Actual April-July Runoff

Gunnison River - near Grand Jct 1,268,000

Ridgway Reservoir Inflow 99,000

North Fork Gunnison River - near Somerset 246,000

Paonia Reservoir Inflow (Mar-Jun) 75,000

Lake Fork Gunnison River - at Gateview 123,000

Tomichi Creek - at Gunnison 80,000

Blue Mesa Reservoir Inflow 602,000

Gunnison River - near Gunnison 297,000

East River - at Almont 156,000

Taylor Park Reservoir Inflow 78,000

Site 

runo

in a
BLACK CANYON PEAK

AND LOWER GUNNISON RIVER TAR
0

200400600800

1000120014001600

Runoff Volume (1000 acre‐feet)

Runoff Year

Blue Mesa Reservoir

Historic Apr‐July Unregulated Inflow Volume Ranking (1969‐2015)

Moderately Dry

Moder

Average Wet

Average Dry

Dry

2016 Actual Runoff Volume

602,000 acre‐feet

2016 Forecasted Runoff Volume

525,000 acre‐feet (May 1)
May

1 Forecast

525 KAF

May 23 ‐ 2

5100 

3349 cfs
0

2000400060008000

10000120001400016000

200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 

Peak Q (cfs)

Forecast BM Apr-Jul Inflow (thousand af)

Peak Flow and Duration Day Targets at Whitew

DRY

MOD WET

AVGWET

AVGDRY

MODDRY

Apr‐July Forecast Half bank Duration Pe

(1000 AF) (days @ 8,070 cfs) (day

<381 0 

381‐516 0 516‐709 10 709‐831 20 

831‐1123 40 

>1123 60 

8070 cfs

9900 cfs
0

100020003000400050006000700080009000

10000

5/1 5/6 5/11 5/16 5/21 5/26 5/31 6/5 6/10 6/15 

Flow (cfs)

Gunnison River Flows

Avg Dry Year

Black Canyon Delta Whitewater North Fork

BC pWW DayDay
0

100020003000400050006000700080009000

10000

Release (cfs)

Aspinall Unit Operations

Blue Mesa Morrow Pt Crystal BM Inflow CR Side Blue Mes
SUMMER/FALL OPERATION

Baseflow Targets

200000

300000400000500000600000700000800000

Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep O

Content (acre‐feet)

BLUE MESA

End of Month Content

2016 ‐ 24mth study
0

500

10001500200025003000

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct 

Monthly Average Flow (cfs)

Gunnison River Flows ‐ Black Canyon

Monthly Average

2016 ‐ 24mth study
CHANGE IN TERMS AGREEMENT

Borrower:       US Global Nanospace, Inc.          Lender:  USDR Aerospace, Ltd.
                f/k/a US Global Aerospace, Inc.
                2533 N. Carson St., Suite 5107
                Carson City, NV  89706

Principal:      Amounts up to $100,000.00          Interest Rate:    10.000%

Loan Date:      April 18, 2003

Maturity:       June 30, 2004

Date of Agreement: June 30, 2004

                      DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING INDEBTEDNESS

A Revolving Promissory Note dated April 18, 2003 in original principal amounts
up to $100,000.00.

                         DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE IN TERMS

The maturity date of this Note is being extended to December 31, 2004. Original
principal amounts have been increased from $100,000.00 to $200,000.00. All other
terms and conditions remain unchanged.

                                 PROMISE TO PAY

US Global Nanospace, Inc. f/k/a US Global Aerospace, Inc., ("Borrower") promises
to pay to USDR Aerospace, Ltd. ("Lender"), the principal balance then
outstanding, together with interest at the rate of 10.000% per annum on the
unpaid principal balance from April 18, 2003, until paid in full.

                                     PAYMENT

Borrower will pay these loans in one principal payment of the balance then
outstanding, plus interest on or before December 31, 2004. This payment due on
December 31, 2004 will be for all principal and all accrued interest not yet
paid. Unless otherwise agreed or required by applicable law, payments will be
applied first to any accrued unpaid interest, than to principal. Borrower may
pay without penalty all or a portion of the amount owed earlier than it is due.

                             SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS

This agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties,
their successors and assigns.


BORROWER:                                LENDER:

US Global Nanospace, Inc.,               USDR Aerospace, Ltd.
f/k/a US Global Aerospace, Inc.          by: United States Defense Research, LC,
                                               General Partner

By: /s/ John Robinson                    By: /s/ Julie Seaman
  ---------------------------------        -------------------------------------
  John Robinson, Chairman                  Julie Seaman, Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       5,974,002
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,334,818
<ALLOWANCES>                                    24,740
<INVENTORY>                                  1,351,128
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,769,326
<PP&E>                                      31,967,248
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,251,708
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              38,763,120
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,122,399
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        82,149
<OTHER-SE>                                  34,837,221
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                38,763,120
<SALES>                                     19,630,240
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,903,362
<CGS>                                       15,130,470
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               21,294,911
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                24,740
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,160,830)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   364,027
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (796,803)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (796,803)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.10)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001002137
<NAME>                        SWISSRAY INTERNATIONAL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1
<CASH>                                     2,171,949
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                              2,805,792
<ALLOWANCES>                               212,166
<INVENTORY>                                7,240,734
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           12,756,106
<PP&E>                                     7,327,995
<DEPRECIATION>                             1,134,947
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             24,047,993
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      16,838,079
<BONDS>                                    16,098,103
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                                   159,083
<OTHER-SE>                                 (9,367,258)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               24,047,993
<SALES>                                    3,879,167
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           3,879,167
<CGS>                                      2,978,034
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              2,978,034
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           3,049,194
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         2,421,613
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,543,417)
<INCOME-TAX>                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,543,417)
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,543,417)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (.31)


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

_________________________________

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD,

Complainant

vs.

BRANDON CHARLES KING,

Respondent.

_________________________________

Docket Number 2023-0407

Enforcement Activity No. 7802755

CONSENT ORDER

Issued: February 14, 2024

By Administrative Law Judge: Honorable Timothy G. Stueve

Appearances:

Dean Epps

Sector Mobile

For the Coast Guard

Brandon Charles King, Pro Se

For Respondent
CONSENT ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

On or about January 11, 2024, the parties in this case submitted a Motion for Approval of 

Settlement Agreement and Entry of Consent Order to be approved as a settlement of the case 

under 33 C.F.R. § 20.502.

I have carefully reviewed the terms of the Settlement Agreement and find it is fair and 

reasonable and in substantial compliance with the requirements of 33 C.F.R. § 20.502.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the record, it is hereby ORDERED, the Settlement Agreement is 

APPROVED in full and incorporated herein by reference. This Consent Order shall constitute 

full, final, and complete adjudication of this proceeding.

Done and dated February 14, 2024, at

Alameda, California

 

_____________________

Honorable Timothy G. Stueve

Administrative Law Judge

U.S. Coast Guard
#### Mary Rachlin, Respondent, v Miriam De L. Ortiz, Also Known as Miriam De Lapaz, Appellant.

an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Sacks, J.), dated February 3, 1986, which denied her motion to dismiss the complaint as time barred.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The plaintiff did not present any evidence that the defendant could not be located prior to the expiration of the Statute of Limitations because of a change in her name and/or a change in her address *(see, Doyon v Bascom,*38 AD2d 645, 645-646; *Feinstein v Bergner,*48 NY2d 234, 241-242; *cf., Thomas v Sousa,*51 AD2d 1028, 1029, *lv dismissed*40 NY2d 806, 989). Further, we note that "the availability of statutory methods of acquiring personal jurisdiction other than by personal delivery within the State makes inapplicable the tolling provisions of CPLR 207” *(see, Yarusso v Arbotowicz,*41 NY2d 516, 519; *see also, Dobkin v Chapman,*21 NY2d 490). Therefore, since the plaintiff conceded that the Statute of Limitations had expired and failed to show that the period of limitation was tolled, the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint as time barred should have been granted. Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 20772 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

RENE SOSA

- BARRERA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:17

- CR

- 406

- 1

Before WIENER, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rene Sosa

- Barrera has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Sosa

- Barrera h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed
counsel’s brief and t he relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 18, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-20772 Document: 00514560316 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/18/2018No. 17

- 20772

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 17-20772 Document: 00514560316 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/18/2018
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-12-0000445 26-FEB-2015 08:19 AM
# C_2021024EN.01003601.xml

| 22.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/36

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M. 10117 — A.P. Moller/APMH Invest/Faerch Group)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 24/17)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | APMH Invest A/S (Denmark), (‘APMHI’), a wholly-owned subsidiary of A.P. Møller Holding A/S (Denmark), (‘APMH’), |
| --- | --- |

—

APMH Invest A/S (Denmark), (‘APMHI’), a wholly-owned subsidiary of A.P. Møller Holding A/S (Denmark), (‘APMH’),

| — | Faerch Group A/S (Denmark), (‘Faerch’). |
| --- | --- |

—

Faerch Group A/S (Denmark), (‘Faerch’).

APMHI acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Faerch.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | APMHI: fund management focussing on shipping, oil exploitation and land based industries. It is an affiliate in APMH, the controlling shareholder in A.P. Møller-Maersk A/S group, an integrated transport and logistics company. |
| --- | --- |

—

APMHI: fund management focussing on shipping, oil exploitation and land based industries. It is an affiliate in APMH, the controlling shareholder in A.P. Møller-Maersk A/S group, an integrated transport and logistics company.

| — | Faerch: manufacture and distribution of plastic packaging for the food industry, including different thermoformed plastic trays in all major plastic resins, mainly serving the European marketplace for ready meals, cold food & snacks and fresh meat. |
| --- | --- |

—

Faerch: manufacture and distribution of plastic packaging for the food industry, including different thermoformed plastic trays in all major plastic resins, mainly serving the European marketplace for ready meals, cold food & snacks and fresh meat.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10117 — A.P. Moller/APMH Invest/Faerch Group

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of ILEX Oncology, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Jeffrey H. Buchalter, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ JEFFREY H. BUCHALTERName: Jeffrey H. BuchalterTitle: President and Chief Executive OfficerDate: May 7, 2004
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to ILEX Oncology, Inc. and will be retained by ILEX
Oncology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 74 (Monday, April 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 20506]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9529]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 3287]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``The Impressionists at Argenteuil''

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985, 22 U.S.C. 2459 ), the Foreign Affairs Reform and 
Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority of 
October 19, 1999, I hereby determine that the objects to be included in 
the exhibition ``The Impressionists at Argenteuil,'' imported from 
abroad for the temporary exhibition without profit within the United 
States, are of cultural significance. These objects are imported 
pursuant to loan agreements with foreign lenders. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the National 
Gallery of Art, Washington, DC from on or about May 28 to August 20, 
2000. And the Wadsworth Atheneum Museum of Art, Hartford, CT, from on 
or about September 6 to December 3, 2000 is in the national interest. 
Public notice of these determinations is ordered to be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of exhibit objects, contact Jacqueline Caldwell, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/
619-6982). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44; 301--4th 
Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

    Dated: April 3, 2000.
William B. Bader,
Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 00-9529 Filed 4-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-U
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

G. BRAD BECKSTEAD
---------------------------
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT

                                                             330 E. Warm Springs
                                                             Las Vegas, NV 89119
                                                                    702.257.1984
                                                              702.362.0540 (fax)


December 26, 2001


To Whom It May Concern:

The firm of G. Brad Beckstead, CPA, consents to the inclusion of my report of
December 26, 2001, on the Financial Statements of American Toy Vending, Inc. for
the years ended September 30, 2001 and 2000, in its annual Form 10KSB which is
to be filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission.

Signed,

/s/ G. BRAD BECKSTEAD, CPA

G. Brad Beckstead, CPA
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Jose H. CORTES, Appellant.

No. 10-3079.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Aug. 1, 2011.

Filed: Aug. 18, 2011.

Susan M. Hunt, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.

Gregg R. Coonrod, Justin G. Davids, Asst. U.S. Attys., Kansas City, MO, for appellee.

Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

After a jury found Jose Cortes guilty of drug and immigration offenses, the District Court1 imposed sentence, and Cortes filed this appeal. His counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), arguing that Cortes’s conviction for conspiring to distribute 500 grams or more of methamphetamine was not supported by the evidence, which, especially as to drug amount, was based primarily on testimony from an unreliable police informant •with a drug history.

Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the jury’s verdict and accepting all reasonable inferences that support the verdict, as we must, we conclude that the evidence was sufficient to support Cortes’s drug-conspiracy conviction. *See United States v. Pruneda,*518 F.3d 597, 605 (8th Cir.2008) (standard of review). The police informant testified about buying in excess of 500 grams of methamphetamine from Cortes and his co-conspirator, often at Cortes’s residence. Additionally, police officers testified about seizing methamphetamine and over $24,000 in cash following a controlled purchase and a search of Cortes and his co-conspirator at Cortes’s residence. *See United States v. Hernandez,*569 F.3d 893, 896 (8th Cir. 2009) (elements of drug conspiracy), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 130 S.Ct. 1308, 175 L.Ed.2d 1093 (2010). The police informant testified about his prior drug and criminal history and about his cooperation with police. It was up to the jury to determine *608the credibility of the witness, to resolve any inconsistent testimony, and to consider whether and how the witness’s desire to secure sentencing leniency affected his credibility. *See United States v. Hodge,*594 F.3d 614, 618 (8th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 180 S.Ct. 3401, 177 L.Ed.2d 314 (2010).

After reviewing the record independently under *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the District Court, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, subject to counsel informing Cortes about the procedures for seeking rehearing from this Court and for filing for a petition for a writ of certiorari from the U.S. Supreme Court.

1

. The Honorable David Gregory Kays, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.