alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Clint B., a Ferson Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[947 NYS2d 25]

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Allen G. Alpert, J.), entered on or about April 8, 2011, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a finding that he committed acts that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of robbery in the second degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree, and placed him on probation for a period of 18 months, with restitution in the amount of $241.28, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning identification and credibility. The record establishes the victim’s ability to recognize appellant as a student in the same school.

In the course of arguing that the court’s finding was against the weight of the evidence, and that the petition should be dismissed on that basis, appellant also challenges several procedural or evidentiary rulings made by the court. However, were we to find that any of these rulings constituted reversible error, the proper remedy would be a remand for further proceedings rather than a determination that the court’s finding was against the weight of the evidence. In any event, we find appellant’s claims to be unavailing. Concur — Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Sweeny, Manzanet-Daniels and Román, JJ.
UN I TE D ST AT ES D I STR I CT C OU RT F O R T H E D IS T R IC T O F C O LU M B IA

__________________________________________ ) MA RY RI CH ARDS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Ci vi l A cti on No. 08 -00 07 (P L F) ) OPTI ON ONE MORTGAGE CORP., e t al
. , ) ) De fe nd ants . ) __________________________________________)
ORDER For the re asons stated in the Opinion issued this same day , it is hereby ORDERED that Counts Four, F ive and Six of plaintiff’s c omplaint are dismissed
a s to de fe nd ant O pti on

On e Mo rt g a g e Cor

po ratio n; i t is FURTHE R ORDERED that defe ndant Option One Mortg ag e Corporation’s mot ion fo r s umm ary

jud g me nt [3 4] is GR

AN TE D; it i s FURTHE R ORDERED that defe ndant Alvin Gross’s motion for summary jud g me nt [2 1] is GR

AN TE D; and

it i s FURTHE R ORDERED that judgme nt shall be enter ed for the def endants. The Clerk of this Court shall remove this ca se fr om the docket of this Court. This is a final appea lable orde r. See F ED . R. A PP . P. 4(a)
.

SO ORDERED. /s/_______________________ PAULL . FRI EDMAN Un i t edS t at es Di s tri ctJ u d ge DATE: F ebrua

ry 4, 2010
**Exhibit 15**

 

August 1, 2008

 

 

Securities and ExchangeCommission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, DC 20549

 

Commissioners:

 

We are aware that ourreport dated August 1, 2008 on our review of interim financial informationof Southern Copper Corporation for the three and six month periods ended June 30,2008 and 2007 and included in the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended June 30, 2008 is incorporated by reference in itsRegistration Statement on Form S-8 dated May 16, 2008.

 

Very truly yours,

 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopersS.C.

 

1

----
# FILED December 6, 1995 Cecil Crowson, Jr. App ellate C ou rt Clerk I N THECOUR

TOFAPPEALS OFTENNES S EE EA S TER N S EC TI O N

C ALVI N EDW

AR D GALLAHER ) M EI GS COUNTY ) 03A 01- 9502- C

H - 00069 Pl a i n tif f - A

p p e lle e )

) ) v. ) HON. FR ANK V. W

I LLI AM S , I I I , ) C HANC ELLOR ) DEEANN GALLAHER ) ) D e f e nda nt - A

ppe l l a nt ) AFFI R M ED AND R

EM ANDED

LEW I S A. COM

BS , J R. , OFKNOXVI LLEF OR APPELLANT DONALD B. R

EI D OFATHENS F OR APPELLEE

O PI N I O N

G odda r d, P . J .
D e e A nn C ur t i s G

a l l a he r a ppe a l s t ha t por t i on of a di vor c e de c r e e e nt e r e d by t he C ha nc e r y C

our t f or M

e i gs C ount y w hi c h gr a nt e d he r hus ba nd, Ca l vi n Edw a r d G a l l a he r , c us t ody of t he i r f our - ye a r - ol d da ught e r .

By he r i s s ue s on a ppe a l s he i ns i s t s t he Tr i a l C our t e r r e d i n not a ppl yi ng t he s a m e - s e x a nd t he t e nde r - ye a r s1 Ru l e 10 . (a ) A f f i r m a n c e W i t hout O

p i n i o n . T h e Co u r t, with th e c onc u r r e n c e of al l j udge s par t i c i p a t i ng i n t h e ca s e , m a y af f i r m

t h e ac t i on of t h e t r i a l cour t by or d e r w i t hout r e nde r i ng a f o r m a l opi n i on w

h e n an opi n i o n woul d have no pr e c e d e n t i a l val u e and one or m o r e of t h e f o l l o w i n g c i r c u m

s t a n ces exi s t an d ar e d i spo s i t i v e o f t h e ap p eal : ( 1 ) t h e Co u r t co n c u r s i n t h e f act s as f o u n d o r as f o u n d b y n ecess a r y i m p l i c a t i on by t h e t r i a l cour t . ( 2 ) t h e r e i s m

a t e r i a l evi d e n c e t o s uppor t t h e ver d i c t of t h e j u r y . ( 3 ) n o r e v e r s i b l e er r o r o f l a w ap p ear s . S u c h cases m

a y b e af f i r m

e d as f o l l o ws : "Af f i r m e d i n acco r d a n ce w i t h Co u r t o f A

p p eal s Ru l e 1 0 ( a ) . " 2 doc t r i ne s . S he a l s o i ns i s t s t ha t t he e vi de nc e pr e ponde r a t e s a ga i ns t t he Tr i a l C our t ' s a w

a r d of c us t ody. O ur r e vi e w

of t he r e c or d, w hi c h i s i n na r r a t i ve f or m a n d as i s u s u a l i n s u c h cas e s l eav e s m u c h t o b e d e s i r e d , pe r s ua de s us t hi s i s a n a ppr opr i a t e c a s e f or a f f i r m a nc e unde r R ul e 10( a ) of t hi s C our t . 1
F or t he f or e goi ng r e a s ons t he j udgm e nt of t he Tr i a l C our t i s a f f i r m

e d a nd t he c a us e r e m a nde d f or s uc h f ur t he r pr oc e e di ngs , i f a ny, a s m a y be ne c e s s a r y a nd c ol l e c t i on of c os t s be l ow . C os t s of a ppe a l a r e a dj udge d a ga i ns t M s . G a l l a he r a nd he r s ur e t y.

_______________________________ H ous t on M

. G odda r d, P . J . CONC UR:

________________________________ H e r s c h e l P . Fr a n k s , J .3

________________________________ D on T. M

c M ur r a y, J .
Exhibit
      32.1








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of AMT Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation,
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2004, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ms.
      Pak King Diu, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
      the
      following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
            The
                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





/s/
                Pak King DiuMs.
                Pak King DiuPresident
                and Chief Financial OfficerJanuary
                24, 2008
**Exhibit
12.1**





**CERTIFICATION**





I,
Ernesto Bertarelli, the Vice-Chairman of the Board, Managing Director and Chief
Executive Officer of Serono S.A., certify that:





1.
 I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Serono
S.A.;





2. 
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. 
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;





4. 
The company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:





a) 
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the company, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b) **[Intentionally
omitted];**





c) 
Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and





d) 
Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
company's internal control over financial reporting; and





5. 
The company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's
auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):





a) 
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and





b) 
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial
reporting.











/s/ Ernesto BertarelliErnesto
      BertarelliVice-Chairman
      of the Board,Managing
      Director and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)





Date:
March 16, 2005
#### Taylor *v.*Wynne *et al.*

*(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.*

July 18, 1890.)

Judgment—Lien—Leasehold.

Under Code Civil Proc. N. Y. § 1430, providing that the term “real property, " as used in chapter 13, arts. 3, 4, relating to the execution sale of land, shall apply to leasehold property where the lessee or his assignee, at the time of sale, is possessed of “at least five years’ unexpired term of lease, ” a judgment, though duly docketed, is not a lien on the judgment debtor’s interest in the unexpired term of a lease having but two years to run.

Motion for reargument. For former report, see 8 N. Y. Supp. 759.

Summary proceedings by Grant B. Taylor against Frank Wynne, Hannah Wynne, and others, to dispossess defendants, as tenants, of the possession of real property which had been sold to Taylor on an execution issued against Frank Wynne. The petition stated that Wynne had leased the premises in question for a term of five years, beginning April 1, 1885; that on March 26, 1888, the judgment was docketed on which the execution was issued; that on April 4, 1888, Wynne assigned the lease to his wife, and that afterwards the execution was issued. Code Civil Proc. N. Y. § 1430, provides that the *645expression “real property,” as used in chapter 13, arts. 3, 4, relating to execution sales of land, includes leasehold property where, at the time of sale, the lessee or his assignee is possessed of at least five years’ unexpired term of lease. The petition was dismissed, and the petitioner appeals.

Argued before Barnard, P. J., and Dykhan and Pratt, JJ.

*Grant B.*Taylor, *in pro. per. Francis Larkin,*for respondents.

Pratt, J.

By section 1430 of the Code, “real property” is said to include leasehold property where there is at least five years unexpired of the lease. In the present case there was but two years unexpired of the lease when the judgment was docketed. The lease not being “real property,” the judgment was not a lien upon it. The assignment to the wife conveyed it free from the lien of the judgment, and when the execution was afterwards issued against the husband the lease was no longer bis property, and a sale upon an execution against him carried no title to the purchaser. Another defect upon the face of the petition was that the judgment was not stated to be for $25, exclusive of costs.

We are still of the opinion expressed on the former appeal. Motion for re-argument denied, with $10 costs and disbursements.
Exhibit 10.6


 


Explanatory Note: This document has been translated
from the Chinese-language original for reference purposes only. While this English translation is believed to be generally accurate, it
is subject to, and qualified by, in its entirety, the Chinese-language original. Such Chinese-language original shall be the controlling
document for all purposes.


 


Purchase Advance Payment Contract


 


Party A (payer): Anhui Aokai Fa Grease Technology Co., Ltd.


Party B (Payee): ____________


 


Party B is Party A’s raw material supplier. In order to reduce
operating costs and enhance the partnership between the two parties, Party A agrees to prepay certain prices for the purchase of corresponding
raw materials for Party B’s obligation to provide Party A with Camellia seeds. After full negotiation by both parties, the following
contracts have been concluded:


 


1. Purpose of advance payment: Party B can only use the advance payment
paid by Party A to purchase camellia seed raw materials, and shall not use it for other purposes.


 


2. Prepaid amount: ____________


 


3. As Party B’s business scope also involves Camellia seed oil,
Party A may also provide Party B with Camellia seed oil of the same value as the advance payment to offset the advance payment. The price
of Camellia seed oil shall be in accordance with Party A’s regulations.


 


4. Repayment method: Party B will deduct the advance payment in the
form of Camellia seeds or equivalent currency to Party A. The repayment period shall not exceed twelve months per year, and special circumstances
shall be negotiated separately.


 


5. Party B promises to provide Party A with Camellia Seeds at a price
that is 2% lower than the actual price of Camellia Seeds on the actual delivery date. After the prepayment is deducted, the settlement
will be based on the actual market price.


 


6. If Party B fails to use the advance payment as required by the agreement,
Party A has the right to recover the advance payment and impose a penalty interest of three thousandths per day for the breached part.


 


7. For matters not covered, the two parties can negotiate and conclude
a supplementary contract. The supplementary contract has the same legal effect as this contract. Any party who fails to negotiate can
bring a lawsuit to the people's court in China.


 


8. This contract is valid for one year, and it will automatically terminate
when it expires.


 


9. This contract has two copies, with each party holding one copy,
and it will take effect from the date of signing.


 


Party A: Anhui Aokai Fa Grease Technology Co., Ltd.


date:


 


Party B: ________________________


date:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                 5
<CIK>                     0001017586
<NAME>                    ETC TRANSACTION CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>              1,000
       
<S>                                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                      807
<ALLOWANCES>                                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                     0
<PP&E>                                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                     808
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                              154
<BONDS>                                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                         1,705
<OTHER-SE>                                                      (1,050)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                       808
<SALES>                                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                     0
<CGS>                                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                   (28)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  11
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                     18
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 18
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAY-23-1998
<CASH>                                             163,773
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      123,745
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,795,974
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,387,730
<PP&E>                                           4,464,627
<DEPRECIATION>                                     964,044
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,871,661
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,288,532
<BONDS>                                          4,815,013
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             1,526
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,104,437
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,871,661
<SALES>                                          4,040,448
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,040,448
<CGS>                                            2,855,193
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,010,978
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   158,501
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  99,811
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (84,035)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (15,453)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (68,582)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (216,441)
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (285,023)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (1.96)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (1.96)
        

</TABLE>
Summary of Compensation for
Non-Employee Directors and Named Executive Officers
 Non-Employee Director Compensation Summary
 Annual Retainer
 Board and Committee Meeting Fees
 Annual Equity Award
 Named Executive Officer Compensation Summary
  Name
    
    Title
    
    SalaryStephen J. Harrison
    
    Chief Executive Officer
    
    $
    500,000Edward L. Pierce
    
    President
    
    
    400,000Kevin P. Cohn
    
    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
    
    
    250,000Dan L. Walker
    
    Senior Vice President  Operations
    
    
    240,000Keith E. Bornemann
    
    Vice President  Corporate Controller
    
    
    160,000
    Additional Information
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Adams, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Giaccio, J.), rendered March 10, 1983, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.
# C_2021520EN.01000401.xml

| 27.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 520/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 520/4

---

Notice for the attention of a person subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/72/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Tunisia

(2021/C 520/03)

The following information is brought to the attention of Ms Halima Bent Zine El Abidine Ben Haj Hamda BEN ALI (No 7), person that appears in the Annex to Council Decision 2011/72/CFSP (1), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011 (2), concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Tunisia.

The Council is considering maintaining the restrictive measures against the above-mentioned person with a new statement of reasons. That person is hereby informed that she may submit a request to the Council to obtain the intended statements of reasons for her designation, before 3 January 2022, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1.C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1.C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

---

(1)  OJ L 28, 2.2.2011, p. 62.

(2)  OJ L 31, 5.2.2011, p. 1.

---
EXHIBIT 23
                                   ----------

                               GEORGE STEWART, CPA
                     2301 SOUTH JACKSON STREET, SUITE 101-G
                            SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98144
                        (206) 328-8554 FAX (206) 328-0383




To Whom It May Concern:

The firm of George Stewart, Certified Public Accountant consents to the
inclusion of my report April 12, 2002, on the Financial Statements of Medina
Coffee, Inc. as of December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2000, in any filings that
are necessary now or in the near future with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission.


Very truly yours,

/s/George Stewart, CPA
George Stewart, CPA

April 12, 2002