alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Jon A. DeLuca, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FiberNet Telecom Group, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 12, 2003
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Petroleum Engineers**

 

MHAPetroleum Consultants, Inc. does hereby consent to the use of its reportsrelating to the proved oil and gas reserves of GeoPetro Resources Company andto the reference to the firm as an expert in the Form 10-K Annual Reportbeing filed by GeoPetro Resources Company.

 
| /s/ LESLIE  S. O’CONNOR |   |
|-----------------------------------|--------|

 

MHAPetroleum Consultants, Inc.Leslie S. O’ConnorVice President

 

Denver,COMarch 18, 2009

 

----
#### DRACHMAN, Respondent, v. NEW YORK & N. J. INV. CO., Appellant.

(Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.

April 25, 1894.)

Appeal from first' district court.

Action by Douis Drachman against the New York and New Jersey Investment Company.

Argued before BOOKSTAVER and BISCHOFF, JJ.

Fromme Bros., for appellant.

T. A. Drachman, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23- 0364 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. LAURRIE ANNE WHEELER - JEAKINS,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including January 15, 2024, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 8 2023

12/08/2023
Case Number: DA 23-0364
#### McMATH, Respondent, v. O’CONNOR, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

December 22, 1896.)

Action by Ellen McMath against James O’Connor. Robert S. Pelletreau, for appellant. Walter H. Jaycox, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We concede the rule, as claimed by the appellant, that to establish a gift causa mortis the evidence must be clear, convincing, strong, and satisfactory. We think that the plaintiff’s claim is fairly established, by the proof, within the rule cited, and the transaction was a natural and reasonable one, considering the circumstances of the parties. It evidently was the intention of the testator to give Carll Nilson only the sum of $1,000 and his real estate. The remainder of his property he bequeathed to his wife. It appears that, subsequent to the execution of his will, the testator gave Nilson the $1,000 in money, and conveyed to him, by deed, the real estate. He thus, during his life, extended his bounty to Nilson to the same extent that he had intended to provide for him by his will. It was natural that the testator, when he found his wife at the point of death, should have transferred his bank books to the plaintiff, his sister and only relative. If, by this transfer, his estate is so depleted that there is nothing to apply to the claims of creditors or his funeral expenses (which is asserted in the briefs, but which we do not find in the *1128evidence), the gilt is doubtless void to the extent of such claims and expenses, and the defendant can maintain his action to avoid the gift to that extent. The issue does not arise in this action, nor is it determined by the judgment-herein. The judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.
**Exhibit32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofSouthern Copper Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Oscar Gonzalez Rocha, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|           | /s/  Oscar Gonzalez Rocha              |
|----------------|----------------------------------------|
|           | Oscar  Gonzalez Rocha                  |
|           | President  and Chief Executive Officer |
|           |                                   |
| August 3, 2006 |                                   |

 

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by section 906 has been provided to Southern Copper Corporation andwill be retained by Southern Copper Corporation and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
#### In the Matter of Michael Plumley, Respondent, v Teresa Lints, Formerly Known as Teresa LaFlair, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

Memorandum: In this custody proceeding it was error for Family Court to disturb the custody of the child with the mother by ordering joint custody with the father where the record demonstrates great animosity and bitterness between the parties *(Braiman v Braiman,*44 NY2d 584, 589-590). (Appeal from order of Oneida County Family Court, Flemma, J. — modify custody.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Green, Balio, Lawton and Schnepp, JJ.
#### Ruth S. Harris, Appellant, v William Stoelzel et al., Respondents.

[945 NYS2d 910]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Cayuga County (Thomas G. Leone, A.J.), entered March 30, 2011. The judgment dismissed the complaint upon a jury verdict.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action seeking, inter alia, a judgment declaring that she acquired an easement by prescription on three portions of defendants’ property, for the benefit of her property. Following a trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of defendants. Plaintiff failed to preserve for *1460our review her contention that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence inasmuch as she failed to make a timely motion to set aside the verdict on that ground *(see Murdoch v Niagara Falls Bridge Commn.,*81 AD3d 1456, 1457 [2011], *lv denied*17 NY3d 702 [2011]; *Homan v Herzig*[appeal No. 2], 55 AD3d 1413, 1413-1414 [2008]). In any event, it cannot be said that “the evidence so preponderated in favor of the plaintiff that [the verdict] could not have been reached on any fair interpretation of the evidence” *(Martinez v Wascom,*57 AD3d 1415, 1416 [2008] [internal quotation marks omitted]; *see Manouselis v Woodworth Realty, LLC,*83 AD3d 801 [2011]; *see generally Lolik v Big V Supermarkets,*86 NY2d 744, 746 [1995]). Present — Scudder, P.J., Centra, Peradotto, Carni and Lindley, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Nicholas R. Schacht, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report of Learning Tree International, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 3, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Learning Tree International, Inc.

August 11, 2009



By:

/s/    NICHOLAS R.
SCHACHTNicholas R. Schacht Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to Learning Tree International, Inc. and will be retained by Learning Tree International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2021365EN.01000101.xml

| 10.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 365/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 365/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10163 — United Internet/Morgan Stanley/Tele Columbus)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 365/01)

On 12 April 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10163. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10163. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit

______________________

DNA GENOTEK INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

SPECTRUM SOLUTIONS LLC,

Defendant-Appellee

______________________

2023-2017

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of California in No. 3:21-cv-00516-RSHDDL, Judge Robert S. Huie.

-------------------------------------------------

DNA GENOTEK INC.,

Appellant

v.

SPECTRUM SOLUTIONS LLC,

Appellee

______________________

2024-1840

______________________

Case: 23-2017 Document: 42 Page: 1 Filed: 06/27/2024
2 DNA GENOTEK INC. v. SPECTRUM SOLUTIONS LLC

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2022-

01347.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R

Spectrum Solutions LLC moves to have Appeal 

Nos. 2023-2017 and 2024-1840 be treated as companion 

cases and assigned to the same merits panel, but the parties have since filed a joint stipulation of voluntary dismissal, with each side to bear its own costs, for Appeal 

No. 2024-1840. 

DNA Genotek Inc. notes that in view of joint stipulation of voluntary dismissal, “all the claims in [U.S. Patent 

No. 11,002,646] that Genotek had been asserting in [Appeal No. 2023-2017] are unpatentable” such that “the issues in [Appeal No. 2023-2017 are] narrowed to those 

relating to [U.S. Patent No. 10,619,187].” Appeal No. 2023-

2017, ECF No. 41 at 2. 

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) Appeal No. 2024-1840 is dismissed, with each side 

to bear its own costs as to that appeal. See Fed. R. App. 

P. 42(b)(1). 

(2) The motions to companion the appeals are denied

as moot.

Case: 23-2017 Document: 42 Page: 2 Filed: 06/27/2024
DNA GENOTEK INC. v. SPECTRUM SOLUTIONS LLC 3

(3) The Clerk of Court shall transmit a copy of this order to the merits panel assigned to Appeal No. 2023-2017.

June 27, 2024

 Date

FOR THE COURT

ISSUED AS A MANDATE (for Appeal No. 2024-1840): July 

27, 2024

Case: 23-2017 Document: 42 Page: 3 Filed: 06/27/2024
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134284 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134284 

 COA: 275725 

Oakland CC: 03-192074-FC 

ALBERT TERRY GRANDBERRY,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 8, 2007 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to 

meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

t1022 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 29, 2007 

 Clerk
# Exhibit 32

# Written Statement of
Paul E. Menzel (Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer) andTimothy D.
Dondlinger (Senior Vice President and Treasurer)Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350

Solely for the purposes of complying
with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, we, the undersigned Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, and Senior
Vice President and Treasurer, respectively, of Ridgestone Financial Services, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

|                                                                 | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/  Paul E. Menzel                                              | 
|Paul E. Menzel
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer | 

|                                                          | 
|--------------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/  Timothy D. Dondlinger                                | 
|Timothy D. Dondlinger
Senior Vice President and
Treasurer | 

Date:  November 10, 2004
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       SECTION 906 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the Quarterly Report of Emeritus Corporation, a Washington
corporation  (the  "Company"),  on  Form  10-Q for the quarter ending September,
2002,  as  filed  with  the  Securities  and Exchange Commission (the "Quarterly
Report"),  I,  Daniel  R. Baty, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant  to  Section  906 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002  ,  that  to  my  knowledge:


1.     The  Quarterly  Report  fully  complies  with the requirements of section
13(a)  or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

2.     The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.



                                            /S/    Daniel  R.  Baty
                                            ------------------------------
                                            Daniel  R.  Baty
                                            Chief  Executive  Officer
                                            November  8,  2002
---

Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-160822) and Form S-3 (No.,
333-164605, No. 333-169815 and No., 333-163395) of American Lorain Corporation
of our report dated March 21, 2011 with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of American Lorain Corporation, which report appears in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K of American Lorain Corporation of the year ended December
31, 2010.

/s/ Samuel H. Wong & Co.,
LLPSamuel H. Wong & Co.,
LLPCertified Public Accountants

San Mateo, California
  May 8, 2012

---
EX-4.1





 Exhibit 4.1 

CLASS A COMMON STOCK     

PAR VALUE $0.0001 
  

			
	Certificate	  	SEE REVERSE FOR
	Number	  	CERTAIN DEFINITIONS
		  	CUSIP 31810N 104

 PERELLA WEINBERG PARTNERS 

INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
  

			
	This Certifies that	 	  

		
	is the owner of	 	  


 FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF CLASS A COMMON STOCK OF 

PERELLA WEINBERG PARTNERS 

(THE “COMPANY”) 
 Perella
Weinberg Partners (hereinafter called the “Company”), transferable on the books of the Company in person or by duly authorized attorney, upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorses. This Certificate and the shares represented
hereby, are issued and shall be held subject to all provisions of the Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (copies of which are on file with the Company and with the Transfer Agent),
to all of which each holder, by acceptance hereof, assents. 
 This certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by
the Registrar. 
 Witness the seal of the Company and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers. 

 

					
	Secretary	  	 [Corporate Seal]

Delaware
	  	Chief Executive Officer
	  
	  		  	  


  
   

 
 The following abbreviations, when used in the
inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to the applicable laws or regulations: 
  

											
	 TEN COM
	 	—	 	 as tenants in common
	  	 UNIF GIFT MIN ACT —
	  	
                
             Custodian
                            

	 TEN ENT
	 	—	 	 as tenants by the entireties
	  		  	   (Cust)
	  	 (Minor)

	 JT TEN
	 	—	 	 as joint tenants with right
	  		  	   under Uniform Gifts to Minors

		 		 	 of survivorship and not as tenants in common
	  		  	
	 	 	 	 	 	  	Act	  	 
		 		 		  		  	  

	 	 	 	 	 	  	 	  	(State)

 For value
received,                     hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto 












  

(PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER(S) OF ASSIGNEE(S)) 

 
  

(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES), INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE(S)) 

 
  
  

 
  

 
 Shares of the Class A common stock represented by
the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitutes and appoints 
  

 
 Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of
the within named Company with full power of substitution in the premises. 
 Dated: 

 
  

NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE(S) TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION
OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER. 
  

	
	Signature(s) Guaranteed:
	By
	
	  

	
	  


 THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS
AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM, PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15 (OR ANY SUCCESSOR RULE) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED).
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
Of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Biotech Holdings Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"), I, Robert B. Rieveley, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1. (1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. (2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:   September __22___, 2006





/s/ Robert B. Rieveley

______________________________________

Robert B. Rieveley, President and C.E.O.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
Of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Biotech Holdings Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"), I, Lorne D. Brown, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1. (1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. (2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:   September _22__, 2006



/s/ Lorne D. Brown

______________________________________

Lorne D. Brown, C.F.O.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 7, 2024

NO. 03-22-00656-CR

Gary Bean, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND KELLY

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of 

conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs 

is made.