alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 178 (Friday, September 17, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 51903]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-20075]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of a meeting of the National Cancer 
Institute Council of Research Advocates.
    The meeting will be held as a virtual meeting and is open to the 
public. Individuals who plan to view the virtual meeting and need 
special assistance or other reasonable accommodations to view the 
meeting, should notify the Contact Person listed below in advance of 
the meeting. The meeting will be videocast and can be accessed from the 
NIH Videocasting and Podcasting website (http://videocast.nih.gov).

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Council of Research 
Advocates.
    Date: September 29, 2021.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. EST.
    Agenda: Welcome and Chairwoman's Remarks, NCI Updates, 
Legislative Update, and Director's Update.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, 
Building 31, Bethesda, MD 20892-2580 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Amy Williams, NCI Office of Advocacy Relations, 
National Cancer Institute, NIH, 31 Center Drive, Building 31, Room 
10A28, Bethesda, MD 20892-2850, (301) 496-9723, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#77001e1b1b1e16161a371a161e1b59191e1f59101801"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="46312f2a2a2f27272b062b272f2a68282f2e68212930">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, 
telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: NCRA: http://deainfo.nci.nih.gov/advisory/ncra/ncra.htm, where 
an agenda and any additional information for the meeting will be 
posted when available.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to scheduling difficulties.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 13, 2021.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-20075 Filed 9-16-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Manhattanville College, Appellant, v James John Romeo Consulting Engineer, P.C., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Submitted December 4, 2006;

decided February 13, 2007

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Judge Jones taking no part.
# C_2021472EN.01000401.xml

| 23.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 472/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 472/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10393 – BROOKFIELD / MODULAIRE)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 472/04)

On 3 September 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10393. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10393. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### Sonia Rosario et al., Respondents, et al., Plaintiffs, v Diagonal Realty, LLC, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Submitted April 30, 2007;

decided May 3, 2007

Motion by AARP for leave to appear amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted only to the extent that the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief may be served and 24 copies filed within seven days.
#### SANDERS, Respondent, v. HURLBURT, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

December 18, 1896.)

Action by Barent B. Sanders against Kate Bleeeker Hurlburt, as executrix.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.
#### Ronald J. Herron et al., Respondents, v Essex Insurance Company, Respondent, and High Peak Agency, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Submitted December 18, 2006;

decided February 15, 2007

*857Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Judge Jones taking no part.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of eLinear, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on  the  date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevan Casey, Chief
Executive  Officer  of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as  adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the  best  of  my  knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/  Kevan Casey
-----------------------------
Kevan Casey,
Chief Executive Officer
November 19, 2003


     A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to  eLinear,  Inc.  and  will  be  retained by eLinear, Inc. and
furnished  to  the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


<PAGE>
Exhibit 21.1



LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF HARBOR GLOBAL COMPANY LTD.



SUBSIDIARIES



|Company:                                                |  | Jurisdiction:
|------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------
|Harbor Global II Ltd.                                   |  | Bermuda      
|HGC Ltd.                                                |  | Bermuda      
|HGCL Ltd.                                               |  | Bermuda      
|Pioneer Forest, Inc.                                    |  | Delaware     
|PREA, Inc.                                              |  | Delaware     
|PREA, L.L.C.                                            |  | Delaware     
|Pioglobal Goldfields II Limited                         |  | Guernsey     
|Closed Joint-Stock Company Pioneer Investments        |  | Russia       
|Pioglobal Omega, L.L.C.                                 |  | Delaware     
|Luscinia, L.L.C.                                        |  | Delaware     
|Theta Enterprises, L.L.C.                               |  | Delaware     
|PIOGLOBAL Investment Fund                               |  | Russia       
|Pioglobal First Russia, Inc.                            |  | Delaware     
|Closed Joint-Stock Company Pioneer Services           |  | Russia       
|Closed Joint-Stock Company PIOGLOBAL Asset Management |  | Russia       
|Closed Joint-Stock Company Pioneer Securities         |  | Russia       
|PIOGlobal Corporation                                   |  | Delaware     
|Closed Joint-Stock Company SN-Projekt                 |  | Russia       
|Maltica Investments Ltd.                                |  | Cyprus       
|Anabasis Enterprises Ltd.                               |  | Cyprus       
|Eutychia Ltd.                                           |  | Cyprus       
|Peperouna Ltd.                                          |  | Cyprus
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 302**

 

I, Timothy P.McGurran, certify that: 

 

1 I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Secure ComputingCorporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

 

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

 

/s/ Timothy P. McGurran

 

Timothy P. McGurran 

President and Chief Operating Officer 

July 31, 2003
# C_2023017EN.01000901.xml

| 18.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 17/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 17/9

---

Opinion 08/2022

(pursuant to Article 322(1), TFEU)

concerning the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Social Climate Fund as revised by the Council [Interinstitutional File 2021/0206 (COD) of 30 June 2022, 10775 2022]

(2023/C 17/07)

The European Court of Auditors has published its opinion 08/2022 (pursuant to Article 322(1), TFEU) concerning the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Social Climate Fund as revised by the Council [Interinstitutional File 2021/0206 (COD) of 30 June 2022, 10775 2022].

The opinion can be consulted directly or downloaded at the European Court of Auditors’ website:

https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/Pages/DocItem.aspx?did=63122

---
**EXHIBIT 31.02**

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, David Barnard, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Design Within Reach, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date:February 17, 2005
# C_2022465EN.01021001.xml

| 6.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 465/210 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 465/210

---

P9_TA(2022)0132

Application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in the area of the Schengen Information System in Cyprus *

European Parliament legislative resolution of 3 May 2022 on the proposal for a Council decision on the application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in the area of the Schengen Information System in the Republic of Cyprus (COM(2021)0472 — C9-0350/2021 — 2021/0266(NLE))

(Consultation)

(2022/C 465/20)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2021)0472), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2021)0472),

| — | having regard to Article 3(2) of the 2003 Act of Accession, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C9-0350/2021), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 3(2) of the 2003 Act of Accession, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C9-0350/2021),

| — | having regard to Rule 82 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 82 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A9-0082/2022), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A9-0082/2022),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

2.

| 3. | Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

3.

| 4. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

4.

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 28, 2019

p0520 

# Order

Clerk May 28, 2019

157399

MATTHEW YOUNG,

Petitioner

- Appellant,

v SC: 157399

COA: 331352

Ingham CC: 15

- 000438

- AA

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

By order of October 2, 2018, the application for leave to appeal the D ecember 21,

2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in

Henderson v Civil Serv Comm (Docket No. 156270). On order of the Court, the case

having been decided on March 15, 2019, ___ Mich ___ (2019), the application is again

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented

should be reviewed by this Court.
IIB 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 246 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 28, 2015 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To improve the response to victims of child sex trafficking. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 246 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. RESPONSE TO VICTIMS OF CHILD SEX TRAF2 FICKING. 

3 Section 404(b)(1)(P)(iii) of the Missing Children’s 

4 Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5773(b)(1)(P)(iii)) is amended 

5 by striking ‘‘child prostitution’’ and inserting ‘‘child sex 

6 trafficking, including child prostitution’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 27, 

2015. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02 - 11 - 00179 - CR

JOEMAR JACKSON APPELLANT
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

---------- FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT CO URT NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY

---------- 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

---------- Appellant Joemar Jackson attempts to appeal from the denial of his pro se motion for use of the trial record on a loan basis. On May 24, 2011, we notified Jackson of our concern that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal, and we informed him that unless he or any party desiring to continue the appeal files with the court, on or before June 3, 2011, a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal, the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R.

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

App. P. 44.3. We have recei ved no response. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f) ; Self v. State , 122 S.W.3d 294, 294

– 95 (Tex. App.

— Eastland 2003, no pet.) (dismissing appeal for want of jurisdiction where trial court denied appellant’s request for free copy of trial court’s records to prosecute post

- conviction writ of habeas corpus); Crear v. State , No. 14

- 05

- 00222

- CR, 2005 WL 914123, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14 th Dist.] Apr. 21, 2005, no pet.) (mem. op

. , not designated for publication) (dismissing for want of jurisdiction appeal of denial of pro se motion to obtain records and request for loan of t rial records).

PER CURIAM
PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J. DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App

. P. 47.2(b )
DELIVERED: July 2 8 , 2011
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 74 (Monday, April 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 20430]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9422]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 74 / Monday, April 17, 2000 / 
Notices

[[Page 20430]]



AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT


Notice of Public Information Collection Requirements Submitted to 
OMB for Review

SUMMARY: U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has 
submitted the following information collection to OMB for review and 
clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. 
Comments regarding this information collection are best assured of 
having their full effect if received within 30 days of this 
notification. Comments should be addressed to: Desk Officer for USAID, 
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB), Washington D.C. 20503. Copies of submission may be 
obtained by calling (202) 712-1365.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    OMB Number: OMB 0412-0035.
    Form Number: AID 1550-2.
    Title: Private and Voluntary Organization Annual Return.
    Type of Submission: Renewal.
    Purpose: USAID is required to collect information regarding the 
financial support to private and voluntary organizations registered 
with the Agency. The information is used to determine the eligibility 
of PVOs to receive USAID funding.
    Annual Reporting Burden:
    Respondents: 442.
    Total annual responses: 442.
    Total annual hours requested: 1,320 hours.

    Dated: April 6, 2000.
Joanne Paskar,
Chief, Information and Records Division, Office of Administrative 
Services, Bureau of Management.
[FR Doc. 00-9422 Filed 4-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6116-01-M