alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.6


 


STOCK TRANSFER AGREEMENT


 


This Stock Transfer Agreement (this
 “Agreement”) is entered into as of April 16, 2021 by and between ShiftPixy Investments, Inc. (the “Transferor”)
and A.G.P./Alliance Global Partners (the “Transferee”).


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, the Transferor desires to
transfer 4,000,000 shares (the “Shares”) of the common stock of Insurity Capital, Inc. (the “Company”) to the
Transferee.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto, for
good and valuable consideration which each party acknowledges the receipt of, hereby agree as follows:


 


		1.	Transfer of the Shares.



 


For $6,956.52, the Transferor hereby
transfers to the Transferee the Shares.


 


		2.	Representations and Warranties of the Transferor.



 


The Transferor represents and warrants
that it has full legal capacity and authority to enter into this Agreement and to transfer the Shares to the Transferee hereunder, and
is not bound by any agreement, instrument or governmental order prohibiting such transfer. The Transferor also represents that it is transferring
such interests free and clear of all liens and encumbrances other than those created by the terms of the Company’s organizational
documents or imposed by applicable federal and state securities laws.


 


		3.	Binding Effect.



 


This Agreement shall be binding upon
and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective legal representatives, successors and assigns.


 


		4.	Entire Agreement.



 


This Agreement constitutes the entire
agreement of the parties hereto.


 


		5.	Governing Law.



 


This Agreement shall be governed by
the laws of the State of New York without regard to its conflict of laws principles.


 


		6.	Modification.



 


This Agreement may not be amended or
supplemented at any time unless by a writing executed by the parties hereto.


 


		7.	Headings.



 


The headings in this Agreement are
solely for convenience or reference and shall not affect its interpretation.


 






    


     


    

 


		8.	Counterparts; Facsimile.



 


This Agreement may be executed in any
number of counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed to be an original and all of which taken together shall constitute
one and the same instrument. This Agreement or any counterpart may be executed via facsimile or other electronic transmission, and any
such executed facsimile or electronic copy shall be treated as an original.


 


[The balance of this page is intentionally left page.]


 






    2


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have
executed this Agreement as of the date first set forth above.


 


	 	Transferor:



 


	 	SHIFTPIXY INVESTMENTS, INC.




 


	 	By:	/s/ Scott W. Absher
	 	Name:	Scott W. Absher
	 	Title:	Chief Executive Officer




 


	 	Transferee:



 


	 	A.G.P./Alliance Global Partners




 


	 	By:	 
	 	Name:	Thomas Higgins
	 	Title:	Managing Director




 



    3
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DANIEL E. GIBBS, SR.

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 16

- 3786

[ April 5, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit,

Martin County ; Lawrence M. Mirman , Judge; L.T. Case No.

431991CF000381A

.

Daniel E. Gibbs, Sr., Madison, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeanine

Germanowicz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

D AMOORG IAN

, L EVINE and C ONNER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE QUARTERLY
REPORT FILED ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             622
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           2,130
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      2,958
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         129,531
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           129,563
<LOANS>                                         44,661
<ALLOWANCE>                                        607
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 182,594
<DEPOSITS>                                     132,718
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,170
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            41
<OTHER-SE>                                      46,665
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 182,594
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,513
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                6,175
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   534
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 9,222
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,022
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            5,200
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      128
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,378
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,870
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,870
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,299
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.39
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.76
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,132
<LOANS-PAST>                                       898
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   519
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       40
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  607
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               607
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        


</TABLE>
#### Elizabeth Alden, Appellant, v St. Joseph’s Hospital Health Center, Respondent.

Submitted April 30, 2007;

decided May 8, 2007

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 75 (Tuesday, April 18, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 20826]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9583]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Resources and Services Administration


Advisory Council; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following 
National Advisory body scheduled to meet during the month of May 2000.

    Name: National Advisory Council on Migrant Health.
    Date and Time: May 4, 2000; 9 a.m.-5 p.m.; May 5, 2000; 9 a.m.-5 
p.m.
    Place: Portland Marriott Downtown, 1401 SW Naito Parkway, 
Portland, Oregon 97201, Phone: (503) 226-7600; Fax: (503) 221-1789.
    The meeting is open to the public.
    Agenda: This will be a meeting of the Council. The agenda 
includes an overview of general Council business activities and 
priorities. Topics of discussion will include the Year 2000 
recommendations, Migrant issues in the Upper Northwest, and updates 
on research related to the Migrant Health Program. The Council 
meeting is being held in conjunction with the National Association 
of Community Health Centers, annual National Farmworker Health 
Conference, May 5-7, 2000.
    Anyone requiring information regarding the subject Council 
should contact Judy Rodgers, Migrant Health Program, staff support 
to the National Advisory Council on Migrant Health, Bureau of 
Primary Health Care, Health Resources and Services Administration, 
4350 East-West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland 20814, Telephone (301) 
594-4304.
    Agenda items are subject to change as priorities indicate.

    Dated: April 12, 2000.
Jane M. Harrison,
Director, Division of Policy Review and Coordination.
[FR Doc. 00-9583 Filed 4-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-15-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Andrew Strouder, Also Known as Harvey Parker, Appellant.

*842The defendant correctly contends, and the People concede, that an undercover officer’s identification of the defendant was improperly bolstered by another police officer *(see, People v Trowbridge,*305 NY 471). However, this error does not warrant reversal of the defendant’s conviction. The claimed error is based upon a single unsolicited statement which merely corroborated the uncontroverted identification of the defendant. Moreover, the defense counsel’s objection was sustained, the statement was stricken from the record, and the trial court gave prompt curative instructions to the jury. Therefore, and especially in view of the fact that the proof of the defendant’s guilt was overwhelming, any error arising from the isolated statement was harmless *(see, People v Johnson,*57 NY2d 969; *People v Sorgente,*90 AD2d 559).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are similarly unavailing. The packet of cocaine which defendant sold to the undercover officer was properly admitted into evidence since there were reasonable assurances of its identity and unchanged condition *(see, People v McGee,*49 NY2d 48, 59, *cert denied sub nom. Waters v New York,*446 US 942; *People v Julian,*41 NY2d 340, 343-344). Under the circumstances of this case, the alleged infirmities in the chain of custody went to the weight of the real evidence and not to its admissibility *(see, People v McGee, supra,*at p 60; *People v Julian, supra,*at p 344; *People v Capers,*105 AD2d 842).

Finally, the remaining evidentiary error raised by the defendant was not specifically objected to by the defendant and his claim with respect thereto has not been preserved for our review (CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Donovan,*59 NY2d 834). In any event, under the circumstances of this case, that contention is without merit. Mollen, P. J., Brown, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.
#### Michelle Winje, Respondent, v Cavalry Veterans of Syracuse, Inc., Appellant.

Memorandum: While driving her vehicle at about 11:30 one evening, plaintiff came upon an object in the roadway. *1028She unsuccessfully swerved to avoid the object and upon striking it, believed it might have been an animal or person. She pulled her car to the side of the road, went back to observe the object and then saw the decapitated body of a man. Plaintiff has been under medical care receiving psychotherapy since this incident. Plaintiff commenced the instant action to recover damages under the Dram Shop Act (General Obligations Law § 11-101) for, *inter alia,*emotional and psychological trauma, alleging that the individual’s presence in the roadway was a result of his intoxication and that defendant served alcoholic beverages to decedent in violation of the statute.

Defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing that portion of the complaint seeking recovery for emotional and psychological trauma upon the theory that such damages are not recoverable in the absence of a physical injury. Special Term denied the motion, concluding that damages for mental anguish are recoverable under General Obligations Law § 11-101 (1) *(Winje v Cavalry Veterans,*130 Misc 2d 580).

We agree that damages for emotional and psychological trauma directly resulting from a violation of the Dram Shop Act are recoverable.

Plaintiff has alleged that her injury resulted "by reason of the intoxication” (General Obligations Law § 11-101 [1]) of decedent and that she has adequately shown that her feelings of guilt and phobia of driving are the direct result of striking the body in the roadway. Under these circumstances, emotional distress or trauma is a species of personal injury *(see, Hyatt v Pepsi-Cola Albany Bottling Co.,*32 AD2d 574; PJI 2:284) encompassed within the language "injured in person” in the Dram Shop Act. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Lynch, J. — summary judgment.) Present— Doerr, J. P., Green, Balio, Lawton and Schnepp, JJ. *[See,*130 Mise 2d 580.]
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                     EXHIBIT 8.1

                                  SUBSIDIARIES

                               PETSEC ENERGY LTD.

                               CONTROLLED ENTITIES

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                                                            % OF OWNER-
                    CONTROLLED ENTITIES                         PLACE OF INCORPORATION          SHIP
                    -------------------                         ----------------------      -----------
<S>                                                             <C>                         <C>
Petsec Investments Pty. Limited                                       Australia                 100

Petroleum Securities Pty. Limited                                     Australia                 100

Najedo Pty. Limited                                                   Australia                 100

Petroleum Securities Share Plan Pty. Limited                          Australia                 100

Petsec America Pty. Limited                                           Australia                 100

Petsec (U.S.A.) Inc.                                                    U.S.A.                  100

Petsec Petroleum Inc.                                                   U.S.A.                  100

Petsec Energy Inc.                                                      U.S.A.                  100

Osglen Pty. Limited                                                   Australia                 80.7

Laurel Bay Petroleum Limited                                          Australia                 100

Ginida Pty. Limited                                                   Australia                 100

Bacobi Pty Limited                                                    Australia                 100

Western Medical Products Pty. Limited                                 Australia                 100
</Table>
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2527 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

7802 37th Avenue in Jackson Heights, New York, as the ‘‘Jeanne 

Sobelson Manford Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 21, 2015 

Mr. CROWLEY (for himself, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Mr. HIGGINS, Mr. RANGEL, Ms. 

VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. SEAN PATRICK MALONEY of New York, Mr. MEEKS, 

Mr. SERRANO, Ms. CLARKE of New York, Ms. MENG, Mr. ISRAEL, Mr. 

NADLER, Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New York, Mr. ENGEL, and 

Mr. TONKO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 7802 37th Avenue in Jackson Heights, New 

York, as the ‘‘Jeanne Sobelson Manford Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JEANNE SOBELSON MANFORD POST OFFICE 

4 BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 7802 37th Avenue in Jackson 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2527 IH

1 Heights, New York, shall be known and designated as the 

2 ‘‘Jeanne Sobelson Manford Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Jeanne Sobelson 

7 Manford Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
VOUCHER NO. 

Standard Form 1080 

Revised April 1982 VOUCHER FOR TRANSFERS Department of the Treasury SCHEDULE NO. BETWEEN APPROPRIATIONS AND/OR FUNDS 1TFRM 2-2500 

1080-109 

Department, establishment, bureau, or office receiving funds BILL NO. 

PAID BY 

Department, establishment, bureau, or office charged 

UNIT UNIT AMOUNT ORDER DATE OF QUAN- ARTICLE OR SERVICES PRICE PRICE DOLLARS NO. DELIVERY TITY COST PER & CENTS 

TOTAL 

Remittance in payment hereof should be sent toACCOUNTING CLASSIFICATION - Office Receiving Funds 

CERTIFICATE OF OFFICE CHARGED 

I certify that the above articles were received and accepted or the service s performed as stated and should be charged to the 

appropriation (s) and / or fund (s) as indicated below; or that the advance payment requested is approved and should be paid as indicated. 

(Authorized administrative or certifying officer) 

(Date) 

(Title) 

ACCOUNTING CLASSIFICATION - Office Charged 

Paid by Check No. 

NSN 7540-00-634-4230 Previous Editions Are Usable
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 221 

To prevent a taxpayer bailout of health insurance issuers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 8, 2015 

Mr. HARRIS (for himself, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. ROE of Tennessee, Mr. 

KELLY of Pennsylvania, Mr. STEWART, Mr. SALMON, Mr. MASSIE, Mr. 

GOSAR, Mr. ROTHFUS, Mr. LAMALFA, Mr. LOUDERMILK, Mr. RIBBLE, 

and Mr. HUELSKAMP) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To prevent a taxpayer bailout of health insurance issuers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Obamacare Taxpayer 

5 Bailout Prevention Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PREVENTION OF BAILOUT OF HEALTH INSURANCE 

7 ISSUERS. 

8 The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is 

9 amended by striking section 1342 (42 U.S.C. 18062). 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Palumbo, Appellant.

Upon oral argument, the defendant’s counsel indicated that the defendant has absconded. Mollen, P. J., Brown, Niehoff and Kooper, JJ., concur.
#### GILLIN, Respondent, v. CANARY, Appellant (two cases).

(City Court of New York, General Term.

October 30, 1896.)

Action by Robert F. Gillin against Thomas Canary.

Joseph C. Rosenbaum, for appellant.

Oppenheim & Severance, for respondent.

FITZSIMONS, J.

These two actions were, on motion of the defendant, consolidated and made one action, and he now complains because judgment was rendered against him for the sum of $4,227.50, contending that in no event can a judgment for more than $2,000 be rendered in this court. This question was passed upon adversely to the appellant’s contention by this court (Bush v. Abrahams, 2 N. Y. Supp. 391) in a case similar to this one. We have examined the record carefully, and find no reason to question the judgment herein. It is therefore affirmed, with costs. SCHUCHMAN, J., concurs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

MAURICE SHOATZ, COREY TAFT, JOHN DANTZLER, KAREEM JONES, CLINTON HITNER, DANNY HORTON, FRANKLIN STUMPHOFER, JOHN DITO, TONY BURTON, JOEL BEVENS, WARREN ANDERSON, ERIC TAULTON, EDWARD JONES, ANTHONY JONES, LESLIE PETTIS, ANTON CARTER, DWAYNE JONES, MARC STATEN, GERALD KALE, JASON DAVIS, JOSE MARTINEZ, HECTOR AVILEZ, COREY BURRELL, PETER MOBLEY, MARK MELTON, ROBERT TUCKER, MARTY BOANES, MATTHEW LAWTON, ODELL BALMER, MCDANIEL WALKER, JALIK PEAY,

LAFAYET TE MILLER, VIRGIL CARSON, CORNELIUS HAROLD, ADAM BUTLER, BRANDON MILLER, KEVIN GILMORE, JAMAR GIBBS, JAMES RIGGINS, MARVIN JONES,

Petitioners

v.

FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT AND ALL

OTHER JUDICIAL DISTRICTS OF

PENNSYLVANIA COURTS OF COMMON PLEAS,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 63 EM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 20th day of August , 2018, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process is GRANTED, and the “Petition for Review Original Action (Writ of

Mandamus)” is DENIED.
No. 76-140.

#### Kent Corp. *v.*National Labor Relations Board et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
LAKE CREEK ABOVE TWIN LAKES RESERVOIRLatitude: 39.063Longitude: -106.408Elevation: 9310

LAKE CREEK ABOVE TWIN LAKES RESERVOIR

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Chapman Tunnel Site Page...



Chapman Tunnel

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Upper Taylor Site Page...



Upper Taylor

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Brumley Site Page...



Brumley

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Independence Pass Site Page...



Independence Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Ivanhoe Site Page...



Ivanhoe

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Nast Lake Site Page...



Nast Lake
#### Dwayne Johnson, Respondent, v New York City Transit Authority, Appellant.

[946 NYS2d 493]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Velasquez, J.), dated March 17, 2010, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.

The plaintiff allegedly sustained injuries when the subway train in which he was a passenger collided with a bicycle on the track while the train was traveling between two subway stations. The plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for personal injuries against the defendant, the New York City *907Transit Authority. The defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, contending, inter alia, that it did not have constructive notice of the bicycle on the track, and that the train operator did not have sufficient time to avoid the contact. The Supreme Court denied the motion. The defendant appeals, and we reverse.

The defendant made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that it did not have constructive notice of the bicycle on the track, that the train operator acted reasonably under the circumstances, and that the accident was unavoidable *(see generally Mirjah v New York City Tr. Auth.,*48 AD3d 764, 764-765 [2008]; *Reeve v Long Is. R.R.,*27 AD3d 636, 637 [2006]; *Wadhwa v Long Is. R.R.,*13 AD3d 615, 615 [2004]; *Rockford v Long Is. R.R.,*291 AD2d 439, 439 [2002]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see *Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320 [1986]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Dillon, J.P., Dickerson, Austin and Miller, JJ., concur.