alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Trycera Financial, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Ray A. Smith, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Ray A. SmithRay A. Smith CEO,principal executive officer,April 14, 2010





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request
#### Renee Etheart et al., Appellants, v Winthrop University Hospital, Also Known as Nassau Hospital, et al., Defendants, and F. Peter Herzberg et al., Respondents.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries based on medical malpractice, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kutner, J.), dated April 7, 1986, which denied the plaintiffs’ motion for a protective order and granted the respondents’ cross motion to compel the plaintiffs to respond to their demand for expert opinion pursuant to CPLR 3101 (d) (1), except to the extent of striking paragraph 1 of that demand.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion for a protective order is granted in its entirety, and the cross motion to compel the plaintiffs to respond to the demand pursuant to CPLR 3101 (d) (1) is denied *(see, Cagatay v Caledonian Hosp.,*133 AD2d 660). Niehoff, J. P., Mangano, Eiber and Harwood, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Nicholas R. Schacht,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report of Learning Tree International, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2010
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Learning Tree International, Inc.



|                 |  |  |  |  |  |     |  |                           
|---------------- |  |  |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------------
|February 8, 2011 |  |  |  | 
|                 |  |  |  | 
|                 |  |  |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    NICHOLAS R.
SCHACHT
|                 |  |  |  |  |  |     |  | Nicholas R. Schacht       
|                 |  |  |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer   

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Learning Tree International, Inc. and will be retained by Learning Tree International, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION**
     I, Godfrey R. Sullivan, Chief Executive Officer of Hyperion Solutions Corporation, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of HyperionSolutions Corporation (the “Registrant”);  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;  4.  The Registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theRegistrant and have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the Registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c)  Disclosed in this report any change in theRegistrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the Registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
 5.  The Registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theRegistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information;and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significantrole in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Dated: February 9, 2005        /s/ GODFREY R. SULLIVAN  Godfrey R. Sullivan
(Thousands of dollars, budget year dollars) FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Total Acquisition Estimated Total Quantity

Vessels $999,000 $803,000 $580,000 $649,000 $874,000 $939,000

Survey and Design - Vessel and Boats $1,000 $500 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

In-Service Vessel Sustainment $21,000 $24,500 $66,000 $94,000 $73,000 $46,000 Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Response Boat - Medium (RB-M) $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $610,000 2015 170

National Security Cutter (NSC) $629,000 $638,000 $75,000 $130,000 $30,000 $47,000 $5,504,000 2019 8

Offshore Patrol Cutter (OPC) $23,000 $20,000 $90,000 $100,000 $530,000 $430,000 $10,523,000 2034 25

Fast Response Cutter (FRC) $310,000 $110,000 $340,000 $220,000 $220,000 $315,000 $3,928,000 2027 58

Cutter Boats $3,000 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $0 $0 Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Polar Icebreaker $2,000 $6,000 $4,000 $100,000 $20,000 $100,000 TBD TBD TBD

Aircraft $175,310 $68,000 $238,000 $185,300 $70,000 $78,000

HC-144A Conversion/Sustainment $9,200 $15,000 $3,000 $25,500 $0 $0 TBD TBD TBD

HC-27J Conversion/Sustainment $24,900 $15,000 $130,000 $100,000 $30,000 $40,000 Not Applicable Not Applicable 14

HH-65 Conversion/Sustainment Projects $12,000 $30,000 $40,000 $35,000 $30,000 $30,000 $1,150,400 2019 102

HC-130J Acquistion/Conversion/Sustainment $129,210 $8,000 $50,000 $9,800 $0 $0 TBD TBD TBD

Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) $0 $0 $15,000 $15,000 $10,000 $8,000 TBD TBD TBD

Other $64,930 $57,300 $68,500 $67,000 $33,000 $28,500

Program Oversight and Management $10,000 $18,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Systems Engineering and Integration $204 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

C4ISR $40,226 $36,300 $40,000 $40,000 $8,000 $5,000 $1,053,000 2026 Not Applicable

CG-LIMS $1,500 $3,000 $8,500 $7,000 $5,000 $3,500 Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Nationwide Automatic Identification System (NAIS) $13,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $276,800 2014 58

Shore and ATON $23,000 $40,580 $100,000 $110,000 $88,000 $70,000

Major Shore, ATON and S&D $2,000 $19,580 $55,000 $50,000 $50,000 $30,000 Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Military Housing $18,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Major Acquisition Systems Infrastructure $0 $16,000 $40,000 $55,000 $33,000 $35,000 Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Minor Shore $3,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Personnel and Management $113,395 $115,313 $116,466 $117,631 $115,407 $113,161

AC&I Core $439 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Direct Personnel Costs $112,956 $115,313 $116,466 $117,631 $115,407 $113,161 Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

TOTAL $1,375,635 $1,084,193 $1,102,966 $1,128,931 $1,180,407 $1,228,661

-$149,459

$1,226,176

FY 2015-2019 Five Year Capital Investment Plan (CIP)

Acquisition, Construction & Improvements
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF P.H.,

A CHILD. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 17

- 00135

- CV

Appeal from

65th District Court

of El Paso Cou nty, Texas

(TC # 2016DCM0578 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below.

It has been determined that Appellant is indigent for purposes of appeal; therefore, this

Court makes no other order with respect to the payment of costs on appeal. This decision shall be

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 28 TH DAY OF NOVEMBER

, 2017.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Ch ief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

May 1, 2013

t0430

Order 

May 1, 2013

146251

ANGELA M. SABATOS,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146251

COA: 302644

Alger CC: 2010-005008-NO

CHERRYWOOD LODGE, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 9, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and 

we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals as on reconsideration granted in light of 

Hoffner v Lanctoe, 492 Mich 450 (2012). 

CAVANAGH, J., would deny leave to appeal.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5785 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5785

To direct the Mine Safety and Health Administration to provide to mine 
 operators for distribution to miners wallet cards and similar devices 
  containing the phone number of the Administration's national hazard 
                        reporting phone number.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 20, 2010

 Ms. Shea-Porter introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Mine Safety and Health Administration to provide to mine 
 operators for distribution to miners wallet cards and similar devices 
  containing the phone number of the Administration's national hazard 
                        reporting phone number.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Mine Worker Safety Hotline 
Accessibility Act''.

SEC. 2. DISTRIBUTION OF NATIONAL HAZARD REPORTING HOTLINE PHONE NUMBER.

    Title I of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (30 
U.S.C. 811 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 117. NATIONAL HAZARD REPORTING HOTLINE.

    ``The Secretary shall provide to all operators plastic wallet 
cards, refrigerator magnets, and other similar devices, containing the 
toll-free telephone number and appropriate Internet website address of 
the national hazard reporting hotline established by the Secretary. 
Each operator shall ensure that each miner employed at each mine of the 
operator receives such cards, magnets, or other devices and shall make 
available such cards, magnets, or other devices to all miner 
communities in order to facilitate the reporting mine accidents, 
incidents, injuries, illnesses, possible violations of this Act or of 
mandatory health or safety standards or plans, or other mine safety and 
health concerns.''.
                                 <all>
```
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2612 

To authorize the appropriation of funds to the Centers for Disease Control 

and Prevention for conducting or supporting research on firearms safety 

or gun violence prevention. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 2, 2015 

Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New York (for herself, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. 

GRIJALVA, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Ms. NORTON, Ms. CLARK of Massachusetts, Mr. LYNCH, Ms. TSONGAS, Mr. CICILLINE, Ms. KELLY of Illinois, 

Ms. ESTY, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. NADLER, and Mr. CUMMINGS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To authorize the appropriation of funds to the Centers for 

Disease Control and Prevention for conducting or supporting research on firearms safety or gun violence prevention. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2612 IH

1 SECTION 1. FUNDING FOR RESEARCH BY CDC ON FIRE2 ARMS SAFETY OR GUN VIOLENCE PREVEN3 TION. 

4 There is authorized to be appropriated to the Centers 

5 for Disease Control and Prevention $10,000,000 for each 

6 of fiscal years 2016 through 2021 for the purpose of con7 ducting or supporting research on firearms safety or gun 

8 violence prevention under the Public Health Service Act 

9 (42 U.S.C. 201 et seq.). The amount authorized to be ap10 propriated by the preceding sentence is in addition to any 

11 other amounts authorized to be appropriated for such pur12 pose. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 180 (Tuesday, September 21, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 52543]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-20391]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 11542]


Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Objects Being 
Imported for Exhibition--Determinations: ``Medieval Bologna: Art for a 
University City'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad 
pursuant to an agreement with their foreign owner or custodian for 
temporary display in the exhibition ``Medieval Bologna: Art for a 
University City'' at the Frist Art Museum, Nashville, Tennessee, and at 
possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of 
cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or 
display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national 
interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chi D. Tran, Program Administrator, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6471; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4d3e282e392422237f7978740d3e392c3928632a223b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7a091f190e131514484e4f433a090e1b0e1f541d150c">[email protected]</span></a>). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000.

Matthew R. Lussenhop,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2021-20391 Filed 9-20-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1






                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-13875) pertaining to the Non-Plan Stock Options, 1996 Equity 
Incentive Plan, 1996 Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan and Employee 
Stock Purchase Plan of Hot Topic, Inc. of our report dated March 13, 1998, with 
respect to the financial statements of Hot Topic, Inc. included in the Annual 
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended January 31, 1998.


                                                Ernst & Young LLP


Los Angeles, California
April 24, 1998
___________ No. 95-3875

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Arkansas. Nicholas Louis Busich, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: March 28, 1996 Filed: April 4, 1996

___________ Before McMILLIAN, WOLLMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Nicholas Louis Busich challenges his convictions upon his guilt y pleas to distributing cocaine base and methamphe tamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C . § 841(a)(1). On appeal, Busich argues that a prior unconteste d civil administrative forfeiture of a 1984 Chevrolet pickup truck barred hi s prosecutionand conviction on double jeopardy grounds. This argument is foreclosed, however, by our recent opinion in United States v. Sykes , 73 F.3d 772, 773-74 (8th Cir. 1996). The judgment is affirmed. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### JONES, Respondent, v. ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CO., Appellant (two cases).

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 16, 1896.)

Action by W. Martin Jones against the Rochester Gas & Electric Company.

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs. All concur. See 39 N. Y. Supp. 1105, 1110.
#### Rubin Sterngass, Appellant, v Melvin L. Maisel et al., Respondents.

— In an action, *inter alia,*to compel specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the plaintiff appeals from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Green, J.), dated June 17, 1986, which, upon an order dated May 12, 1986, granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, dismissed the complaint, and (2) so much of an order of the same court, dated April 27, 1987, as, upon renewal, adhered to the original determination. We deem the notice of appeal from the order dated May 12, 1986 to be a premature notice of appeal from the judgment dated June 17, 1986 (CPLR 5520 [c]).

Ordered that the appeal from the judgment is dismissed, as it was superseded by the order dated April 27, 1987, made upon renewal; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated April 27, 1987 is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the defendants are awarded one bill of costs.

*451Special Term properly dismissed the complaint since the plaintiffs purported acceptance of the defendants’ offer to sell certain real property, tendered 14 months after the making of the offer, was not, as a matter of law, made within a reasonable period of time *(see,*Restatement [Second] of Contracts § 41; 1 Corbin, Contracts § 36; *Modern Pool Prods. v Rudel Mach. Co.,*58 Misc 2d 83). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Brown and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit
      13.2**





**Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**


**Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





I,
      A.
      Cameron Richardson, Chief Financial Officer of Aurora Metals (BVI) Limited
      (the
“Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that to my knowledge:





1.
            The
                Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the period ended December
                31, 2005 which this certification accompanies fully complies with
                the
                requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
                Act of
                1934: and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








Date:
                June 13, 2007
            (s)*A.
                Cameron Richardson*A.
                Cameron RichardsonChief
                financial Officer







This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
      A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
      document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
      required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
      by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff upon request.
(August 31, 1987)

#### Sami Basaranlar, Appellant, v Pelham Bay General Hospital, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

In an action to recover damages, *inter alia,*for tortious interference with contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Bambrick, J.), dated January 21, 1986, which, after a hearing, granted the motion of the defendant Pelham Bay General Hospital to dismiss the complaint insofar as it is asserted against it, for lack of personal jurisdiction.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The evidence adduced at the hearing indicates that plaintiff attempted to effectuate personal service on the defendant Pelham Bay General Hospital, a partnership, by personally serving an administrative assistant thereof, who was not herself a partner. CPLR 310 provides that "[pjersonal service upon persons conducting a business as a partnership may be made by personally serving the summons * * * upon any one *242of them”. Accordingly Trial Term properly held that personal jurisdiction was not acquired over the defendant Pelham Bay General Hospital *(see, Italian Colony Rest. v Wershals,*45 AD2d 841; *cf., G-M Assocs. v Aldo Realty Co.,*59 AD2d 733, *lv denied*43 NY2d 648). Mangano, J. P., Niehoff, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.