alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Stephen G. Kasnet, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Harbor Global Company Ltd.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying
officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;



b) [paragraph omitted
pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];



c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and



d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.



|Date:    March | 16, 2006
|-------------- | --------



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|/s/    STEPHEN G. KASNET                 
|Stephen G. Kasnet Chief Executive Officer
# Exhibit 32

# Written Statement
of Paul E. Menzel (Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer) and
William R. Hayes (Senior Vice President and Treasurer) Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350

Solely for the purposes of complying
with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, we, the undersigned Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive
Officer, and Senior Vice President and Treasurer, respectively, of Ridgestone Financial
Services, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended September 30,
2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

/s/ Paul E. MenzelPaul E.
Menzel Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ William R. Hayes William
R. Hayes Senior Vice President and Treasurer

Date: November 13, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5811 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5811

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 23, 2010

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama and Coushatta Indian 
  Tribes of Texas Restoration Act to allow the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo 
  Tribe to determine blood quantum requirement for membership in that 
                                 tribe.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BLOOD QUANTUM REQUIREMENT DETERMINED BY TRIBE.

    Section 108(a)(2) of the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama and 
Coushatta Indian Tribes of Texas Restoration Act (25 U.S.C. 1300g-
7(a)(2)) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(2) any person of Tigua Ysleta del Sur Pueblo Indian 
        blood enrolled by the tribe.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 22, 2010.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
----

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1. | The                Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section                13(a) or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in                all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Company. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |    /s/                Daniel R. Baty |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|   | Daniel                R. Baty                       |
|   | Chief                Executive Officer              |
|   | August                8, 2007                       |

----
- Skip to Primary Navigation
      - Skip to Main Content
      - Skip to Footer

          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   

        -  Water & Power            - Dams
          - Powerplants
          - Projects
          - Agrimet/Hydromet
          - Water Operations 
        -  Resources & Research            - Programs
          - Technical Service Center
          - Research & Development
          - Reclamation Manual
          - Environmental Resources/Reports
          - Library 
        -  About Us            - Mission/Vision
          - Fact Sheet
          - Commissioner
          - Addresses/Contacts
          - Organizational Chart
          - Leadership Bios
          - Employment
          - Contact 
        -  Recreation & Public Use            - Find Recreation
          - Recreation.gov
          - Public Use 
        -  News & Multimedia            - News Releases
          - News Stories
          - Speeches
          - Congressional Testimony
          - Fact Sheets
          - Photos
          - Multimedia
          - Social Media 

# Youth

              - Reclamation
              - Youth
              - Recreation

YOUTH              - Youth
              - Recreation                  - Every Kid in the Park 
              - Education
              - Volunteer
              - Employment
              - Contact
              - News

## Recreation

The Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) has gravitated from development of single-purpose agricultural projects toward a multipurpose approach to water resource development that includes recreation.  Today, Reclamation plays a major role in meeting the increasing public demands for water-based outdoor recreation facilities and opportunities.

The recreation areas developed as a result of Reclamation water projects are among the Nation's most popular for water-based outdoor recreation (see footnote below). Reclamation projects include approximately 6.5 million acres of land and water that is, for the most part, available for public outdoor recreation. 

Learn More →

More Programs

Reclamation also participates in other governmental initiatives that encourage playing outside.
            - Every Kid in the Park

*Last Updated: 2/12/19*

## More Information about the Bureau of Reclamation

## Stay in Touch

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

            - Contact Us
            - Site Index
            - Accessibility
            - Disclaimer
            - DOI
            - FOIA
            - No Fear Act
            - Notices
            - Privacy Policy
            - Quality of Information
            - Recreation.gov
            - USA.gov
**EXHIBIT
32**
  **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**
 **PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  In
connection with the annual report of Capital Growth Systems, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lee
Wiskowski, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, I, Douglas Stukel, the
Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Derry L. Behm, the Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant
to l8 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  ****Date: May 4, 2005
    By:
    /s/ Lee WiskowskiLee WiskowskiCo-Chief Executive Officer
 
 ****By:
    /s/ Douglas StukelDouglas StukelCo-Chief Executive Officer
  ****By:
    /s/ Derry L.
BehmDerry L. BehmChief Financial Officer
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
  The
foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as an exhibit to the Report and is
not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
exv10w2xcy





Exhibit 10.2(c)


June
9, 2009


Winton Capital Management 

la. St. Mary Abbot’s Place

Kensington, London W86LS, 

U.K.


Attention: Mr. Martin Hunt




			
	      Re:	 	Management Agreement Renewals





Dear Mr. Hunt:




We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools
to which reference is made below (the “Management Agreements”). We are extending the term
of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2010 and all other provisions of the
Management Agreements will remain unchanged.





	 	•	 	Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	Citigroup Orion Futures Fund L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	CMF Winton Feeder I LP
	 
	 	•	 	CMF Winton Master Fund L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	Citigroup Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	CMF Institutional Futures Portfolio LP
	 
	 	•	 	Citigroup Abingdon Futures Fund L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	Citigroup Global Futures Fund Ltd.
	 
	 	•	 	Citigroup Orion Futures Fund (Cayman) Ltd.





Please
acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and
returning it to the attention of Ms. Jennifer Magro at the address above or fax to
212-793-1986. If you have any questions I can be reached at 212-559-5046.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Very truly yours,


CITIGROUP MANAGED FUTURES LLC

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Jennifer Magro
 	 
	 	 	Jennifer Magro 	 
	 	 	Chief Financial Officer & Director 	 
	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	WINTON CAPITAL MANAGEMENT	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By: 
Print Name:
	 	/s/ Martin Hunt
 

MARTIN HUNT
	 	 
	JM/sr

	 	DIRECTOR	 	 
	 

	 	WINTON CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       (327,191)
<SECURITIES>                                   141,119
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,633,632
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,968,857
<PP&E>                                         529,430
<DEPRECIATION>                                  36,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,050,697
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,916,497
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        40,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,050,697
<SALES>                                     11,463,976
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,463,976
<CGS>                                       11,026,551
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,398,943
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,091
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 46,445
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,775
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             30,670
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    30,670
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Seymour Klamner, Appellant, v Rockland County Board of Elections et al., Respondents, and Herbert Reisman et al., Respondents-Respondents.

In a proceeding to *187invalidate petitions designating Herbert Reisman as a candidate for the public office of Supervisor of the Town of Ramapo, and Isaac Goodfriend and Deborah Chiat as candidates for the public offices of members of the Town Council of the Town of Ramapo, in the Liberal Party primary election to be held on September 15, 1987, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Miller, J.), entered August 10, 1987, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We find that the failure of the petitioner to serve all necessary parties by mail within the 14-day period required by Election Law § 16-102 (2) constitutes a fatal defect *(see, Matter of Wohl v Miller,*63 NY2d 687; *Matter of Curcio v Wolf,*133 AD2d 188 [decided herewith]; *Matter of Moore v Milhim,*109 AD2d 810; *Matter of Floyd v Coveney,*83 AD2d 897; *Matter of Buhlmann v LeFever,*83 AD2d 895, *affd*54 NY2d 775). We have examined the remainder of the petitioner’s contentions on appeal and find them to be without merit. Bracken, J. P., Niehoff, Rubin, Spatt and Harwood, JJ., concur.
# C_2021504EN.01003901.xml

| 14.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 504/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 504/39

---

Notice for the attention of the persons and entity subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/1999, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/2197 and in Council Regulation (EU) 2020/1998, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2195 concerning restrictive measures against serious human rights violations and abuses

(2021/C 504/12)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons and entity that appear in the Annex to Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/1999 (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/2197 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) 2020/1998 (3) as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2195 (4), concerning restrictive measures against serious human rights violations and abuses.

The Council of the European Union has decided that those persons and entity should be included on the list of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision (CFSP) 2020/1999 and Regulation (EU) 2020/1998. The grounds for designations of those persons and entity appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

The attention of the persons and entity concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) 2020/1998, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).

The persons and entity concerned may submit a request to the Council before 31 July 2022, together with supporting documentation that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1.C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1.C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council’s periodic review, pursuant to Article 10 of Decision (CFSP) 2020/1999, of the list of designated persons and entities.

---

(1)  OJ L 410 I, 7.12.2020, p. 13.

(2)  OJ L 445 I, 13.12.2021, p. 17.

(3)  OJ L 410 I , 7.12.2020, p. 1.

(4)  OJ L 445 I, 13.12.2021, p. 10.

---
Maintain Complaint 

Privacy

Be Transparent With 

Your Expectations

Treat Employees 

Consistently

Know Your 

Responsibilities

Communicate Often With 

Civil Rights Service Provider

Stop Reported Behaviors 

and Document Events

Treat Employees 

Differently

Interfere with the 

EEO Process

Take Frustrations out on 

the Employee who Made 

the Complaint

Criticize Employees 

for Filing a Complaint

DON’Ts

COAST GUARD ANTI-RETALIATION

The Do’s and Don’ts of Retaliation for Supervisors

Discipline Employees 

for Filing a Complaint

DO’s

LEARN MORE

Delay Responses to 

Discrimination Concerns 

and Complaints

Retaliation, also known as reprisal, occurs when an employer takes an action against an 

employee for engaging in legally protected Equal Employment Opportunity/Equal Opportunity 

(EEO/EO) activity. This fact sheet will help supervisors understand the Do’s and Don’ts of 

retaliation. Civil Rights Service Providers are available to assist with any retaliation questions.

Stop Retaliation Before it Starts
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Adam Jamison, Appellant.

[946 NYS2d 569]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (David Stadtmauer, J.), rendered April 30, 2009, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree, attempted assault in the second degree, and criminal trespass in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to consecutive terms of 15 years and 2 to 4 years, concurrent with a term of 1 year, and order, same court and Justice, entered on or about December 22, 2010, which denied defendant’s CPL 440.10 motion to vacate the judgment, unanimously affirmed.

By failing to make any effort to obtain an allegedly exculpa*572tory videotape after the People informed him of it and offered to make it available to him, defendant abandoned the claim that the People failed to disclose it *(see People v Graves,*85 NY2d 1024, 1027 [1995]; *People v Bethune,*65 AD3d 749, 754 [2009], *lv denied*17 NY3d 792 [2011]). The People disclosed the existence of this tape at defendant’s arraignment, but defendant made no mention of the tape before or during trial, except for a general reference to videotapes made in a discovery motion. Defendant never alerted the court to any claim that this videotape had not been produced. In any event, the record refutes defendant’s assertion that the tape may have been exculpatory.

Any deficiency in the People’s CPL 710.30 (1) (b) notice became irrelevant when defendant moved to suppress the identification testimony and received a full hearing on the fairness of the identification procedure *(see People v Kirkland,*89 NY2d 903 [1996]).

Defendant’s argument that his lawyer was ineffective in failing to move to reopen the suppression hearing based on the trial testimony of two identifying witnesses is unavailing because this evidence would not have resulted in a different suppression ruling *(see People v Evans,*16 NY3d 571, 576 [2011]). Based on the accounts of the identifications given at trial, both identifications would have still constituted constitutionally permissible showups *(see e.g. People v Gatling,*38 AD3d 239, 240 [2007], *lv denied*9 NY3d 865 [2007]).

We have considered defendant’s pro se arguments, including his additional claims of ineffective assistance, and find them to be without merit. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, DeGrasse, Richter and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.