alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### ATLANTIC RESEARCH MARKETING SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stephen P. TROY, Jr. and Troy Industries, Inc., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 2011-1447.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Sept. 6, 2011.

Before LOURIE, MOORE, and REYNA, Circuit Judges.

ON MOTION

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Atlantic Research Marketing Systems, Inc. (ARMS) moves to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Stephen P. Troy, Jr. and Troy Industries, Inc. (Troy) oppose. ARMS replies.

Troy’s appeals focuses on two decisions by the magistrate judge concerning discovery matters. Troy argues that such decisions are immediately appealable to this court under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1). That section allows, in relevant part:

> Upon consent of the parties, a full-time United States magistrate judge or a part-time United States magistrate judge who serves as a full-time judicial officer may conduct any or all proceedings in a jury or nonjury civil matter and order the entry of judgment in the case, when specially designated to exercise such jurisdiction by the district court or courts he serves.

The docket in this case does not indicate that this case was referred to a magistrate judge for judgment under Section 636(c)(1) and judgment has not been entered. This section is inapplicable.

Because there are pending claims, there is no final judgment and this appeal is premature. *See Nystrom v. TREX Co.,*339 F.3d 1347, 1350 (Fed.Cir.2003) (“If a case is not fully adjudicated as to all claims for all parties and there is no express determination that there is no just reason for delay or express direction for entry of judgment as to fewer than all of the parties or claims, there is no final decision ... and therefore no jurisdiction.”) Any adversely affected party may, of course, file a notice of appeal after the district court claims disposes of all claims and enters final judgment.

Accordingly,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) The motion is granted.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Salvatore Saldo, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Aiello, J.), rendered May 25, 1983, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Lawrence and Hooper, JJ., concur.
#### Marion LaMont, Respondent, v David LaMont, Appellant. (Action No. 3.)

Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Denman, Boomer and Schnepp, JJ.
exv10w18






Exhibit 10.18




FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AND

NONCOMPETITION AGREEMENT




     THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AND NONCOMPETITION AGREEMENT (“First
Amendment”), between RSC Equipment Rental, Inc., f/k/a Rental Service Corporation (the “Company”)
and • (“Executive”), is entered into on •, 2010.



RECITALS:




     WHEREAS, the parties entered into an Executive Employment and Noncompetition Agreement on •,
2010 (the “Employment Agreement”);



     WHEREAS, Executive and the Company have agreed to a temporary reduction of Executive’s Base
Salary (as defined in the Employment Agreement, and which shall be referred to as the Pre-Reduction
Rate set forth below) through December 31, 2009, with the understanding that all other provisions,
other than that provided herein, of the Employment Agreement shall remain unchanged.



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth,
the adequacy and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Company and Executive agree as
follows:



     1. Commencing on •, 2010, Executive’s Base Salary shall be reduced by ten percent (10%) (the
“Reduction”) for the remainder of calendar year 2010. The amount paid from January 1, 2010 through
•, 2010 was based on an annual rate of $• (the “Pre-Reduction Rate”). Commencing on January 1,
2011, Executive’s Base Salary shall revert to the Pre-Reduction Rate. Any merit increases in 2011
shall be based upon the Pre-Reduction Rate.



     2. Executive agrees that the Reduction shall not constitute Good Reason to resign, as defined
under Section 2.5(a) of the Employment Agreement.



     3. For all purposes under the Employment Agreement other than payment of monthly Base Salary
under Section 2.1 of the Employment Agreement and the calculation of eligible earnings for Variable
Compensation, Base Salary shall be the Pre-Reduction Rate. For example, for the avoidance of doubt,
Severance Benefits (under Section 2.5), if any, shall be calculated based on the Pre-Reduction
Rate.



     Except as modified herein, the terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain
unchanged and in full force and effect.



 









 





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this First Amendment, or caused this
First Amendment to be duly executed on their respective behalf by their respective duly authorized
officers, all effective as of the date and year first written above.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	RSC EQUIPMENT RENTAL, INC.	 	 	 	EXECUTIVE
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	 	 	 	 	By:	 	 
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 





2
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 14, 2022.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 14, 2022

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A22I0209. IN THE INTEREST OF L. M., A CHILD .

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2200120
#### KINNEY, Respondent, v. HOLBROOK, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

December 16, 1896.)

Action by Charles Kinney against Josiah Holbrook.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1



               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No.333-24789) pertaining to the 1994 Incentive and Non-Statutory
Stock Option Plan, the 1995 Stock Plan and the Employee Stock Purchase Plan of
MassageMedia, Inc. and in the Registration Statements (Forms S-3 No. 333-42855
and No. 333-70959) of MessageMedia, Inc. and the related Prospectus of our
report dated February 2, 1999, except for Note 12, for which the date is March
26, 1999, with respect to the consolidated financial statements included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.



                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP


San Diego, California
March 29, 1999
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

STEPHEN L. MITCHELL, JANIE

MITCHELL BELEW, LISA MITCHELL

SEIGMANN, and LINDA MITCHELL

STAPLETON

,

Appellants,

v.

MAP RESOURCES, INC., PECOS BEND

ROYALTIES, LLP, PBR PROPERTIES

JOINT VENTURE, and TOMMY

VASCOCU

,

Appellees. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 17

- 00155

- CV

Appeal from the

143rd District Court

of Reeves County, Texas

(TC# 15

- 06

- 21057

- CVR )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee s

recover from Appellant s and their sureties, if any, see TEX.R.APP.P. 43.5, on the judgment and

all costs, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified below for observance

.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2020.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.

Alley, C.J., concurring

Rodriguez, J., dissenting
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2607 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2607

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 7802 37th Avenue in Jackson Heights, New York, as the ``Jeanne and 
                 Jules Manford Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 2, 2015

   Mr. Crowley (for himself, Ms. Clarke of New York, Mr. Engel, Mr. 
 Higgins, Mr. Israel, Mr. Sean Patrick Maloney of New York, Mr. Meeks, 
   Ms. Meng, Mr. Nadler, Mr. Rangel, Mr. Serrano, Ms. Slaughter, Mr. 
    Tonko, Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney of New York, and Ms. Velazquez) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                    Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 7802 37th Avenue in Jackson Heights, New York, as the ``Jeanne and 
                 Jules Manford Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JEANNE AND JULES MANFORD POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 7802 37th Avenue in Jackson Heights, New York, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Jeanne and Jules Manford Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Jeanne and 
Jules Manford Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997             SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,395,133               1,390,891
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         5,390                   5,390
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,545,953)             (1,554,021)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                       0
<SALES>                                        231,480                 231,480
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               231,480                 231,480
<CGS>                                               66                      66
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  401,858                 401,858
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (16,136)                (24,204)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (186,381)               (194,449)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (170,378)               (170,378)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (186,381)               (194,449)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.05)                  (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

Complainant

vs.

RONN JESTER PEROS MONARES

Respondent.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket Number: 2023-0448

MISLE Activity ID: 7823461

WITHDRAWAL FROM DOCKET

The Coast Guard initiated an administrative proceeding by filing a Complaint on December 18, 

2023, seeking a revocation of Respondent’s Merchant Mariner Credential.

On Jan 16, 2024, the Coast Guard filed a Motion of Withdrawal from docket as:

Respondent signed a Voluntary Surrender Agreement in accordance with 46 CFR 5.203.

This matter is removed from the docket and closed without prejudice effective this date. The 

Coast Guard reserves the right to file a new Complaint in this matter.

Done and Dated January 16, 2024 at, 

Baltimore, MD

____________________________

Lauren M Meus

Hearing Docket Clerk

U.S. Coast Guard

By Direction of the Chief Administrative Law Judge
Exhibit
32.2



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The
undersigned, Tannya L. Irizarry, the Interim Chief Financial Officer of GeneThera, Inc. (the Company), DOES HEREBY
CERTIFY that:



1.      
The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.      
Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
of the Company.



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement this 21st day of September , 2020.



| | /s/ Tannya
    L. Irizarry                                                                            
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Tannya
    L. Irizarry
    Interim Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to GeneThera, Inc. and will be retained by
GeneThera, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The
foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated
by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.
1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Intevac, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ KEVIN FAIRBAIRNKevin FairbairnPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Director
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 74 (Monday, April 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20488-20489]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9519]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-37,273]


Cumberland Apparel, Monticello, KY; Amended Certification 
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Notice of Certification 
Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on 
March 23, 2000, applicable to workers of Cumberland Apparel, 
Monticello, Kentucky. The notice will be published soon in the Federal 
Register.
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers produce 
children's sleepwear. New findings show that there was a previous 
certification, TA-W-33,812, issued on September 22, 1997, for workers 
of Cumberland Apparel, Monticello, Kentucky who were engaged in 
employment related to the production of children's sleepwear. That 
certification expired September 22, 1999. To avoid an overlap in worker 
group coverage, the certification is being amended to change the impact 
date from January 10, 1999 to September 23, 1999, for workers of the 
subject firm.

[[Page 20489]]

    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-37,273 is hereby issued as 
follows:

All workers of Cumberland Apparel, Monticello, Kentucky who became 
totally or partially separated from employment on or after September 
23, 1999 through March 23, 2002 are eligible to apply for adjustment 
assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.


    Signed at Washington, DC this 7th day of April, 2000.
Grant D. Beale,
Program Manager, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-9519 Filed 4-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
#### In the Matter of J. Jerome Olitt.

Concur — Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Milonas, Rosenberger and Ellerin, JJ.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2340 

To amend the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act to remove 

regulatory barriers to the re-exportation of controlled substances among 

members of the European Economic Area. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 14, 2015 

Mr. PITTS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each 

case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 

the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Controlled Substances Import and Export 

Act to remove regulatory barriers to the re-exportation 

of controlled substances among members of the European Economic Area. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RE-EXPORTATION AMONG MEMBERS OF THE 

4 EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA. 

5 Section 1003(f) of the Controlled Substances Import 

6 and Export Act (21 U.S.C. 953(f)) is amended— 

7 (1) in paragraph (5)— 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2340 IH

1 (A) by striking ‘‘(5)’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘(5)(A)’’; 

3 (B) by inserting ‘‘, except that the con4 trolled substance may be exported from the sec5 ond country to another country that is a mem6 ber of the European Economic Area’’ before the 

7 period at the end; and 

8 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(B) Subsequent to any re-exportation de10 scribed in subparagraph (A), a controlled substance 

11 may continue to be exported from any country that 

12 is a member of the European Economic Area to any 

13 other such country, provided that— 

14 ‘‘(i) the conditions applicable with respect 

15 to the first country under paragraphs (1), (2), 

16 (3), (4), (6), and (7) are met by each subse17 quent country from which the controlled sub18 stances is exported pursuant to this paragraph; 

19 and 

20 ‘‘(ii) the conditions applicable with respect 

21 to the second country under such paragraphs 

22 are met by each subsequent country to which 

23 the controlled substance is exported pursuant to 

24 this paragraph.’’; and 

25 (2) by adding at the end the following: 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2340 IH

1 ‘‘(g) LIMITATION.—The Attorney General shall not 

2 promulgate nor enforce any regulation, subregulatory 

3 guidance, or enforcement policy which impedes re-expor4 tation among European Economic Area countries (as pro5 vided in subsection (f)(5)), including by promulgating or 

6 enforcing any requirement that— 

7 ‘‘(1) re-exportation from the first country to the 

8 second country or re-exportation from the second 

9 country to another country (as such terms are used 

10 in subsection (f)) occur within a specified period of 

11 time; or 

12 ‘‘(2) information concerning the consignee, 

13 country, and product be provided prior to expor14 tation of the controlled substance from the United 

15 States.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS