alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2604 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Union Calendar No. 169
114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2604

                          [Report No. 114-224]

 To improve and reauthorize provisions relating to the application of 
     the antitrust laws to the award of need-based educational aid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 2, 2015

Mr. Smith of Texas (for himself and Mr. Johnson of Georgia) introduced 
    the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

                             July 23, 2015

                   Additional sponsor: Mr. Cicilline

                             July 23, 2015

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To improve and reauthorize provisions relating to the application of 
     the antitrust laws to the award of need-based educational aid.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Need-Based Educational Aid Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION RELATING TO THE APPLICATION OF THE ANTRITRUST LAWS TO 
              THE AWARD OF NEED-BASED EDUCATIONAL AID.

    Section 568 of the Improving America's Schools Act of 1994 (15 
U.S.C. 1 note) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) in paragraph (2), by inserting ``or'' after the 
                semicolon;
                    (B) in paragraph (3), by striking ``; or'' and 
                inserting a period at the end; and
                    (C) by striking paragraph (4); and
            (2) in subsection (d), by striking ``2015'' and inserting 
        ``2022''.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 169

114th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2604

                          [Report No. 114-224]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To improve and reauthorize provisions relating to the application of 
     the antitrust laws to the award of need-based educational aid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 23, 2015

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATIONS



Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, in his capacity as an officer of SPACEHAB, Incorporated (SPACEHAB), that, to the
best of his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of SPACEHAB on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of SPACEHAB.



Date: July 18, 2005



/s/ Michael E. KearneyMichael E. KearneyPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Brian K. HarringtonBrian K. HarringtonSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SPACEHAB and will be retained by SPACEHAB and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Si Chen, the Chief Executive Officer of
AMERICAN LORAIN CORPORATION (the Company), DO HEREBY CERTIFY that:

| | 1. | The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal
      year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report), fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
      the Company.                                                               

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this
statement this 30th day of April 2010.

/s/ Si ChenSi Chen Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to American Lorain Corporation and will be retained by
American Lorain Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to §18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2585 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2585

  To amend title II of the Social Security Act to eliminate the five-
month waiting period in the disability insurance program, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 1, 2015

 Mr. Israel (for himself and Ms. Michelle Lujan Grisham of New Mexico) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title II of the Social Security Act to eliminate the five-
month waiting period in the disability insurance program, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Sanchez-Young Social Security 
Disability Insurance for the Terminally Ill Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF TITLE II WAITING PERIOD FOR TERMINALLY ILL 
              INDIVIDUALS.

    (a) In General.--Section 223(a)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 423(a)(1)) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
sentence: ``In the case of any application for disability insurance 
benefits filed by an individual who is determined to be under a 
disability and who is determined to be terminally ill by a primary care 
provider (as defined by the individual's State of residence), medical 
specialist, or other qualified provider or with respect to whom the 
Commissioner has determined would otherwise suffer undue hardship by 
application of a waiting period, this paragraph shall be applied 
without regard to any waiting period. For the purposes of the preceding 
sentence, an individual is considered to be terminally ill if the 
individual has a medical prognosis that the individual's life 
expectancy is 12 months or less.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall take 
effect with respect to applications filed after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles Dixon, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Felig, J.), both rendered January 27, 1981, convicting him of *487robbery in the first degree (two counts; one as to each indictment), upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.
[866 NE2d 1030, 834 NYS2d 702]

#### Carol W. Zorn, Appellant, v Rita K. Gilbert et al., Respondents.

Decided April 3, 2007

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Robert M. Cohen,*Ballston Lake, for appellant.

*Housman & Associates, P.C.,*New York City *(Brian J. Divney*of counsel), for respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be modified, without costs, by reinstating the legal malpractice cause of action and remitting to Supreme Court for consideration of issues raised by defendants on the motion to dismiss but not reached by that court and, as so modified, affirmed.

Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint alleging, in part, that plaintiffs legal malpractice cause of action was barred by the statute of limitations. An action to recover damages arising *934from legal malpractice must be commenced within three years after accrual (see CPLR 214 [6]; 203 [a]). “The continuous representation doctrine tolls the statute of limitations . . . where there is a mutual understanding of the need for further representation on the specific subject matter underlying the malpractice claim” *(McCoy v Feinman,*99 NY2d 295, 306 [2002]; *see also Shumsky v Eisenstein,*96 NY2d 164, 167-168 [2001]). Plaintiffs cause of action accrued, at the latest, on December 4, 1997, when a judgment of divorce was entered in the underlying action *(see McCoy,*99 NY2d at 305). Defendants’ representation of plaintiff in the underlying action ended, at the earliest, in June 1998. Inasmuch as this action was commenced in May 2001, the Appellate Division erred in holding that plaintiff’s cause of action alleging legal malpractice was time-barred *(see McCoy,*99 NY2d at 305; *Shumsky,*96 NY2d at 167-168). Issues regarding plaintiffs other causes of action, decided by the courts below, are not raised before us.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order modified, without costs, by reinstating the legal malpractice cause of action and remitting to Supreme Court, Westchester County, for further proceedings in accordance with the memorandum herein and, as so modified, affirmed.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Maurice GREGORY, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 07-6003.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 22, 2007.

Decided: March 5, 2007.

Maurice Gregory, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

*304Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Maurice Gregory appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See United States v. Gregory,*No. 2:92-cr-00163 (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 22, 2006; entered Nov. 27, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         498,165
<SECURITIES>                                       129
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,340,091
<ALLOWANCES>                                   780,455
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,036,225
<PP&E>                                         376,688
<DEPRECIATION>                                 602,894
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,698,535
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,655,063
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        40,600
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,003,234
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,698,535
<SALES>                                      5,433,869
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,433,869
<CGS>                                        6,724,319
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,759,625
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,118
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             133,392
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,482,856)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,482,856)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,482,856)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### PEOPLE ex rel. SULLIVAN, Appellant, v. MARTIN et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

December 11, 1896.)

Certiorari by John J. Sullivan against James J. Martin and others.

L. J. Grant, for appellant.

T. Connoly, for respondents.

No opinion. Proceedings affirmed, with costs.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joel Mark, Appellant.

Submitted January 29, 2007;

decided February 13, 2007

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Steven Banks, Esq., the Legal Aid Society, 199 Water Street, New York, NY 10038 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.

Judge Jones taking no part.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Larry Jackson, Appellant.

The defendant’s claim that the trial court improperly limited the scope of cross-examination of the complainant is unpreserved for appellate review *(see, People v Ford,*66 NY2d 428; *People v Wright,*115 AD2d 677). In any event, the court’s ruling was proper. It is well settled that the scope of cross-examination rests largely in the sound discretion of the trial court *(see, People v Mandel,*48 NY2d 952, *cert denied and appeal dismissed*446 US 949, *reh denied*448 US 908). In the instant case the court’s ruling was proper since the complainant’s living with her mother and losing custody of her child were collateral to the issue involved.

The defendant has failed to preserve for appellate review the propriety of the prosecutor’s remarks on summation *(see, People v Dordal,*55 NY2d 954; *People v Jones,*89 AD2d 875), and, in any event, his comments were well within the bounds of permissible advocacy as well as in answer to issues raised by the defense *(see, People v Galloway,*54 NY2d 396; *People v Ashwal,*39 NY2d 105; *People v Lawrence,*91 AD2d 642). Mangano, J. P., Weinstein, Lawrence and Fiber, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
audited consolidated balance sheet of Avaya Inc. at September 30, 2000 and the
audited consolidated statement of operations for the year ended September 30,
2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             271
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,820
<ALLOWANCES>                                        62
<INVENTORY>                                        639
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,362
<PP&E>                                           1,745
<DEPRECIATION>                                     779
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,037
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,589
<BONDS>                                            713
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,037
<SALES>                                          7,680
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,680
<CGS>                                            3,370
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,345
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   468
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    36
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  76
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (448)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (73)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (375)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (375)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.39)


</TABLE>
---

|Exhibit 32.1                                 
|---------------------------------------------
|                                             
|Certification Pursuant to                    
|18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to
|Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Garuda Capital Corp.
  (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2005,
  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
  Report), I, C. Robin Relph, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
  Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted
  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1 | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  |                                                                                                                                                     
|2 | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|By:                        
|---------------------------
|                           
|/s/ *C. Robin Relph*       
|                           
|C. Robin Relph,            
|Chief Executive Officer and
|Chief Financial Officer    
|                           
|November 10, 2005          

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
ACE*COMM's Corporation's audited financial statements as of and for the year
ended June 30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           7,920
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,130
<ALLOWANCES>                                        10
<INVENTORY>                                       2814
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,865
<PP&E>                                           4,651
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,181
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,518
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,030
<BONDS>                                          1,013
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            86
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,623
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,518
<SALES>                                         33,684
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 33684
<CGS>                                           17,626
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,626
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,464
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (191)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,784
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,160
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,624
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,624
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2559 

AN ACT 

To designate the ‘‘PFC Milton A. Lee Medal of Honor 

Memorial Highway’’ in the State of Texas. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2559 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The segment of Interstate Route 10 between milepost 

3 535 and milepost 545 at Kendall County, Texas, shall be 

4 known and designated as the ‘‘PFC Milton A. Lee Medal 

5 of Honor Memorial Highway’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the segment 

9 of Interstate Route 10 referred to in section 1 shall be 

10 deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘PFC Milton A. Lee 

11 Medal of Honor Memorial Highway’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 15, 2015. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2559 

AN ACT 

To designate the ‘‘PFC Milton A. Lee Medal of 

Honor Memorial Highway’’ in the State of Texas.
#### PETTIT, Respondent, v. CITY OF BROOKLYN, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 20, 1896.)

Action by Smith Pettit against the city of Brooklyn.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur.