alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF EAGLE USA AIRFREIGHT, INC. FOR
THE NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q REPORT.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          33,880
<SECURITIES>                                    14,076
<RECEIVABLES>                                   57,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                       461
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               110,032
<PP&E>                                          27,153
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,986
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 140,303
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,185
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            19
<OTHER-SE>                                     113,099
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   140,303
<SALES>                                        295,239
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               295,239
<CGS>                                          164,525
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  164,525
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               106,829
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 25,144
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,620
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,524
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,524
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.80
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM RAYTEL MEDICAL
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000   
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           7,787
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,004<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,255
<PP&E>                                          25,270
<DEPRECIATION>                                (15,545)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  72,528
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,689
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,745
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    72,528
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,652
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,386
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    17
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F2>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 148
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,101
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,240
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,861
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,861
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21
<FN>
<F1>REPRESENTS NET RECEIVABLES.
<F2>INCLUDED IN TOTAL COSTS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
(78 Hun, 351.)

#### In re VAN NOSTRAND.

(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.

May 18, 1894.)

Discovery—Examination, of Party before Trial.

An affidavit for the examination of a party before trial, to enable affiant to prepare his complaint, is fatally defective, where it contains allegations on information and belief, but does not recite the facts on which such information and belief are based.

Appeal from special term, New York county.

Application for the examination of Charles B. Van Nostrand, to enable affiant to prepare his complaint in an action to be brought by him. From an order denying a motion to vacate an order for the examination, said Van Nostrand appeals.

Reversed.

Argued before VAN BRUNT, P. J., and FOLLETT and PARKER, JJ.

*113Treadwell Cleveland, for appellant.

William Mitchell, for respondent.

PARKER, J.

The affidavit upon which the order is based, authorizing the examination of Van Nostrand for the alleged purpose of enabling the affiant to prepare his complaint in an action to be brought by him, is fatally defective, in that it fails to support the allegations made upon information and belief by the affidavit ■of deponent’s informant, or by assigning a reason for not producing such affidavit, and presenting, instead, the statements made by him to the affiant. From the affidavit it appears that the information which persuaded the affiant to make it was obtained from •one MacDonald, and an alleged copy of an agreement. The so-called “agreement” does not justify the belief expressed, and the remaining source of information is therefore MacDonald’s statement to him. But he has failed to furnish to the court any part •of the conversation with MacDonald. Whether MacDonald said anything to justify the impression made upon the affiant’s mind, the court cannot know; and the authority to inquire into the private affairs of an alleged interested party to an action will not be granted by it until it has such knowledge of the facts as persuades it that the examination is desired solely for the purposes authorized by the Code. The order should be reversed, with $10 ■costs and printing disbursements, ■ and motion granted, with $10 ■costs. All concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                        SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                                8,689,000
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        12,294,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                            167,000
<INVENTORY>                                           1,123,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      3,844,000
<PP&E>                                               12,552,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                        6,643,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       31,692,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 8,700,000
<BONDS>                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                156,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           66,519,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         31,692,000
<SALES>                                              34,180,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     34,180,000
<CGS>                                                14,423,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        14,423,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     24,312,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (4,555,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (4,555,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (4,555,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                              (.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              (.29)
        


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gerald Gilbert, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Suffolk County (Mallon, J.), both rendered July 1, 1985, convicting him of robbery in the second degree under indictment No. 1830/84 and burglary in the second degree under indictment No. 434/85, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mangano, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Fiber, JJ., concur.
# C_2021505EN.01000501.xml

| 15.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 505/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 505/5

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10551 – AMALFI INVEST OPPORTUNITIES / LA DORIA)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 505/04)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Amalfi Invest Opportunities S.à r.l. (‘AIO’, Luxembourg), ultimately controlled by Investindustrial S.A. (‘Investindustrial’, Luxembourg); and |
| --- | --- |

—

Amalfi Invest Opportunities S.à r.l. (‘AIO’, Luxembourg), ultimately controlled by Investindustrial S.A. (‘Investindustrial’, Luxembourg); and

| — | La Doria S.p.A. (‘La Doria’, Italy), ultimately controlled by certain members of the Ferraioli Family. |
| --- | --- |

—

La Doria S.p.A. (‘La Doria’, Italy), ultimately controlled by certain members of the Ferraioli Family.

AIO acquires, within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation, control of the whole of La Doria.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | for Investindustrial (and its subsidiary AIO): investments in medium-sized companies based in Europe, including Italy, Portugal, Spain, and the United Kingdom, focusing on four main investment areas: consumer and leisure, healthcare and services, industrial manufacturing and technology. |
| --- | --- |

—

for Investindustrial (and its subsidiary AIO): investments in medium-sized companies based in Europe, including Italy, Portugal, Spain, and the United Kingdom, focusing on four main investment areas: consumer and leisure, healthcare and services, industrial manufacturing and technology.

| — | for La Doria: active worldwide in the production and marketing of food products, particularly in the vegetable and juices processing sector. |
| --- | --- |

—

for La Doria: active worldwide in the production and marketing of food products, particularly in the vegetable and juices processing sector.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10551 – AMALFI INVEST OPPORTUNITIES / LA DORIA

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF EAGLE USA AIRFREIGHT,
INCORPORATED FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS 
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q REPORT.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          27,366
<SECURITIES>                                     4,382
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,155
<ALLOWANCES>                                       811
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                75,824
<PP&E>                                          14,336
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,438
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  87,375
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,439
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            18
<OTHER-SE>                                      65,918
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    87,375
<SALES>                                        129,075
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               129,075
<CGS>                                           72,877
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   72,877
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                44,975
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,197
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,735
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,462
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,462
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.40
        

</TABLE>
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2512 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to make clear that Federal employees 

who receive back pay for a period during which they are furloughed 

due to a lapse in appropriations may not also receive unemployment 

compensation for the same period. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 21, 2015 

Mr. BRADY of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to make clear that 

Federal employees who receive back pay for a period 

during which they are furloughed due to a lapse in 

appropriations may not also receive unemployment compensation for the same period. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Furloughed Federal 

5 Employee Double Dip Elimination Act’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2512 IH

1 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 8508 of title 5, United 

3 States Code, is amended— 

4 (1) by inserting ‘‘(a)’’ before the first sentence; 

5 and 

6 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(b) The rules and regulations shall include provi8 sions to ensure that, in the case of a Federal employee 

9 who receives back pay for a period during which such em10 ployee was furloughed due to a lapse in appropriations— 

11 ‘‘(1) such back pay shall be treated in the same 

12 way as Federal wages attributable to such employee; 

13 and 

14 ‘‘(2) the period to which such back pay relates 

15 shall be treated in the same way as a period of Fed16 eral service attributable to such employee.’’. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

18 subsection (a) shall be effective as of the date of the enact19 ment of this Act. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
IIB 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2394 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 10, 2015 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, 

and Forestry 

AN ACT 

To reauthorize the National Forest Foundation Act, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2394 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Forest Foun3 dation Reauthorization Act of 2015’’. 

4 SEC. 2. NATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION ACT REAUTHOR5 IZATION. 

6 (a) EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE MATCH7 ING FUNDS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE AND PROJECT EX8 PENSES.—Section 405(b) of the National Forest Founda9 tion Act (16 U.S.C. 583j–3(b)) is amended by striking 

10 ‘‘for a period of five years beginning October 1, 1992’’ 

11 and inserting ‘‘during fiscal years 2016 through 2018’’. 

12 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 

13 410(b) of the National Forest Foundation Act (16 U.S.C. 

14 583j–8(b)) is amended by striking ‘‘during the five-year 

15 period’’ and all that follows through ‘‘$1,000,000 annu16 ally’’ and inserting ‘‘there are authorized to be appro17 priated $3,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2016 through 

18 2018’’. 

19 (c) TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS.— 

20 (1) AGENT.—Section 404(b) of the National 

21 Forest Foundation Act (16 U.S.C. 583j–2(b)) is 

22 amended by striking ‘‘under this paragraph’’ and in23 serting ‘‘by subsection (a)(4)’’. 

24 (2) ANNUAL REPORT.—Section 407(b) of the 

25 National Forest Foundation Act (16 U.S.C. 583j– 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 2394 RFS

1 5(b)) is amended by striking the comma after ‘‘The 

2 Foundation shall’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 9, 2015. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6887
ANTHONY COHEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Warden; LOUIS RUZICKA, Captain, Correctional Officer V, 7 - 3 shift; NATHAN ROLLINS, Lieutenant, Correctional Officer IV, 3 - 11 shift; DELANVIEL EVANS, Sargeant, Correctional Officer III ,7-3 shift; JOHN THOMAS, Correctional Officer II, 3 - 11 shift, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-96-2275-WMN) Submitted: January 22, 1998 Decided: February 4, 1998 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Cohen, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Cohen v. Corcoran , No. CA-96-2275-WMN (D.Md. June 13, 1997).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2021089EN.01000501.xml

| 16.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/5

---

Information notice on marking specifications for single-use plastic products

(2021/C 89/05)

The Commission would like to inform the relevant operators and Member States’ authorities that in order to support the implementation of the obligation under Directive (EU) 2019/904 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) regarding the marking of certain single-use plastic products, as of 3 July 2021, and as required under Article 7(2) of that Directive, the Commission has adopted an Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/2151 (2) laying down rules on harmonised marking specifications on single-use plastic products listed in Part D of the Annex to Directive (EU) 2019/904 and related the corrigenda.

The marking concerns single-use plastic products listed in part D of the Annex to Directive (EU) 2019/904. These products are:

| (1) | Sanitary towels (pads), tampons and tampon applicators; |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Sanitary towels (pads), tampons and tampon applicators;

| (2) | Wet wipes, i.e. pre-wetted personal care and domestic wipes; |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Wet wipes, i.e. pre-wetted personal care and domestic wipes;

| (3) | Tobacco products with filters and filters marketed for use in combination with tobacco products; |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Tobacco products with filters and filters marketed for use in combination with tobacco products;

| (4) | Cups for beverages. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Cups for beverages.

Pictograms in vectorised format

With reference to the harmonised marking requirements in the Annex to the Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/2151 considering the corrigenda, please find below the weblink to the vectorised pictograms, in the order they appear in the Annexes I to IV of the Implementing Regulation, in all official languages of EU Member States (as courtesy translation also in Gaelic, though not included in the Implementing Regulation).

https://ec.europa.eu/environment/topics/plastics/single-use-plastics/sups-marking-specifications_en

---

(1)  OJ L 155, 12.6.2019, p. 1.

(2)  OJ L 428, 18.12.2020, p. 57.

---