alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. PR99-257-006]

Take notice that on April 6, 2000, Williams Gas Pipelines Central Inc. (Williams) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to become effective November 1, 1999. 

Substitute Second Revised Sheet No. 267.

Sheet No. 268 

On December 30, 1999, Williams filed revised tariff sheets and a Reconciliation and Refund report in the above-referenced dockets related to the settlement of all Gas Supply Realignment (GSR) cost issues. That filing is pending before the Commission. In that filing, Williams inadvertently deleted sections 14.4 and 14.5 of the General Terms and Conditions of its tariff. Those sections dealt with Stranded Investment and Exit Fees, respectively, and did not relate to GSR costs in any way. The instant filing proposes to reinstate these sections as sections 14.3 and 14.4 to be consistent with the numbering of preceding sections in Article 14. Williams is not proposing any changes in the language of these sections.

Williams states that copies of the revised tariff sheets are being mailed to all parties on the Commission's official service list as well as to William's jurisdictional customers and interested state commissions.

Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with § 154.210 of the Commission's regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-9597  Filed 4-17-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.4

                             FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
                               INGRAM MICRO 401(k)
                             INVESTMENT SAVINGS PLAN
                (AS AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE APRIL 1, 2006)

      This Amendment by Ingram Micro Inc. (hereinafter referred to as the
"Company") is made with reference to the following facts:

      The Company adopted the amended and restated Ingram Micro 401 (k)
Investment Savings Plan (hereinafter referred to as the "Plan") effective as of
April 1, 2005. The Plan reserves to the Company the right to amend the Plan
(Section 12.1 thereof). The Company has adopted and executed this First
Amendment for purposes of amending the Plan in the manner hereinafter provided.

      NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of April 1, 2005
as if included in the most recent amendment and restatement of Plan, as follows:

      Section 7.5(e) is amended by deleting the next to last sentence of the
      first paragraph and by replacing it with:

      "The period of repayment for any home loan within the meaning of Section
      72(p)(2)(B)(ii) of the Code shall not exceed one hundred and eighty (180)
      months."

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this First Amendment is executed effective as set
forth herein.

   (CORPORATE SEAL)

      Date: 6/14/2006                   INGRAM MICRO INC.


                               By: /s/ Matthew A. Sauer
                                   ------------------------------------------
                                   Matthew A. Sauer

                               Title: Senior Vice President, Human Resources
(8 Misc. Rep. 442.)

#### RYSHPAN v. GOLDBERG et al.

(Superior Court of New York City, General Term.

May 7, 1894.)

Equity—Reformation—Party.

Reformation of a mortgage cannot be decreed after it has been assigned, unless the assignee is made a defendant.

Appeal from special term.

Action by Paulina Ryshpan against Nathan M. Goldberg and others to reform a bond and mortgage. There was a judgment in favor of plaintiff, and defendants appeal. Reversed.

Argued before SEDGWICK, C. J., and FREEDMAN and McADAM, JJ.

Edward N. G. Johnston, for appellants.

Isidor Hirschfield, for respondent.

SEDGWICK, C. J.

The action was for the reformation of a bond and mortgage by changing the date for their payment. The plaintiff had judgment against both defendants, who now appeal from it. The plaintiff was the mortgagor. The defendant Nathan . Goldberg was the mortgagee. He assigned the bond and mortgage „ *658to the defendant Manuel Goldberg. Among other defenses, Manuel Goldberg set up “that he is not the owner or possessor of the said bond and mortgage, or of either of them, and that one Mary Keheler is the owner thereof.” The judge found that this answer was true in point of fact. Mary Keheler was not made a party to the action. The plaintiff had no equitable cause of action against the defendants. The defendants had no interest in the bond and mortgage. They were not in their possession. The court could not compel them to produce the same. A judgment against them would have no efficacy. Correspondingly, the plaintiff had no substantial interest in procuring judgment against the defendants, nor had the conduct of the latter been wrongful in any way against the plaintiff, if that consideration were relevant. The judgment should be reversed. Judgment reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide the event.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM RAYTEL
MEDICAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,785
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,833<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,789
<PP&E>                                          24,446
<DEPRECIATION>                                (15,064)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  70,729
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,010
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                      54,164
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    70,729
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                41,088
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   34,414
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (2,496)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F2>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 252
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,918
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,567
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,351
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,351
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .60
<FN>
<F1>(RECEIVABLES) REPRESENTS NET RECEIVABLES.
<F2>(LOSS PROVISION) INCLUDED IN TOTAL COSTS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pyramid Breweries Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
John Lennon, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act OF 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ JOHN LENNON
-------------------------------------
John Lennon
President and Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2005
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Coast GuardU.S. Department of Homeland Security

Search
Search

Search

-  Home    -  News Room             
  -  Reserve             
  -  Forcecom             
  -  Operations             
  -  Mission Support             
  -  Atlantic Area             
  -  Pacific Area             
  -  History 
-  Units    -  Organization             
  -  Coast Guard A to Z             
  -  Atlantic Area             
  -  Pacific Area             
  -  Force Readiness Command 
-  Leadership    -  Commandant’s Initiatives             
  -  Senior Leadership             
  -  Deputy Commandant for Operations             
  -  Deputy Commandant for Mission Support             
  -  Atlantic Area Commander             
  -  Pacific Area Commander             
  -  Reserve             
  -  Auxiliary 
-  Resources    -  CG Support             
  -  Legal      -  JoinCGJAG             
    -  Legal_Assistance        -  Find-A-Legal-Assistance-Lawyer             
      -  FAQ 
  -  Civil Rights             
  -  Work-Life             
  -  Administrative Law Judges      -  Virtual Hearing 
  -  Newsroom             
  -  Family             
  -  Library             
  -  CG Web Mail             
  -  Return 2 Service      -  FAQ 
-  Community    -  Art Program             
  -  Girl Scouts / Boy Scouts      -  Eagle Scout Recognition 
  -  Coast Guard Band             
  -  Coast Guard Cities             
  -  Honor Guard             
  -  JROTC      -  NEWS 
  -  Special Programs      -  Industry Academy        -  Contacts             
      -  2018 
  -  Trademark             
  -  Resources      -  History             
    -  CGC Eagle 
-  Mariners    -  National Vessel Documentation Center             
  -  National Maritime Center             
  -  National Pollution Funds Center      -  NRD        -  NRD_FAQs             
      -  Trustee_Links             
      -  NRD_DOCS             
      -  About_NRD_Funding 
  -  Boating Safety 
-  doing business		 
-  Join		 
-  Recruiting		 
-  contact		 
-  About		 

HomeResourcesAdministrative Law JudgesDecisionsALJ Decisions 2003

**ALJ Decisions: 2003**

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

**

                      - FOIA
                      - Privacy Policy
                      - MHS Notice of Privacy Practices
                      - Accessibility
                      - No FEAR
                      - Whistleblower Protection
                      - U.S. Department of Homeland Security
                      - DHS Office of Inspector General
                      - WhiteHouse.gov
                      - USA.gov

### Stay Connected

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
# C_2021430EN.01000401.xml

| 25.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 430/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 430/4

---

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2010/638/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/1867, and in Council Regulation (EU) No 1284/2009 imposing certain specific restrictive measures in respect of the Republic of Guinea

(2021/C 430/04)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2010/638/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/1867 (2), and in Annex II to Council Regulation (EU) No 1284/2009 (3).

The Council of the European Union has determined that the persons that appear in the above-mentioned Annexes continue to fulfil the criterion set out in Decision 2010/638/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 1284/2009 concerning restrictive measures against the Republic of Guinea and should therefore remain subject to the measures, as renewed by Decision (CFSP) 2021/1867.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the websites in Annex III to Regulation (EU) 1284/2009, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 8 of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation before 30 June 2022, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1.C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1.C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 280 26.10.2010, p. 10.

(2)  OJ L 377, 25.10.2021, p. 34.

(3)  OJ L 346, 23.12.2009, p. 26.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Administration for Children and Families; Office of Refugee Resettlement 

# AGENCY:

Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) Administration for Children and Families, DHHS. 

# ACTION:

Notice of cancellation. 

# SUMMARY:

The Office of Refugee Resettlement Standing Announcement (62 FR 64856) issued December 9, 1997 is hereby modified to reflect the cancellation of three program areas: Category 3, Community Orientation, Category 4, Technical Assistance to Orientation Grantees, and Category 5, Mental Health. 

                        Closing dates for Category 1, Preferred Communities, Category 2, Unanticipated Arrivals, and Category 6, Ethnic Community Organizations will remain unchanged,                         *i.e.*                         January 31 and June 30 every year.                     

These changes are effective with the date of this publication. 

For further information, please contact Marta Brenden, Office of Refugee Resettlement, telephone 202-205-3589. 

Dated: April 13, 2000. 

Carmel Clay-Thompson, 

Acting Director, Office of Refugee Resettlement. 

[FR Doc. 00-9634  Filed 4-17-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

September 4, 2012

t0827

Order 

September 4, 2012

144534 & (17)(18)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144534

COA: 306714

Kent CC: 09-002014-FC

DARRYL EDWARD CHANEY, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 16, 2011 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The 

motions to remand and to appoint counsel are DENIED.
Exhibit 10.18.1


 


 


July 1, 2020


 


Thomas Garite, MD


653 Round Tree Drive


Grand Junction, CO 81506


 


Re: Amendment to Offer of Employment for Thomas
Garite, MD dated June 17, 2020


 


Dear Tom:


 


This letter is an amendment (the “Amendment”)
to the aforementioned Offer of Employment from Sera Prognostics, Inc. dated June 17, 2020 (the “Offer of Employment”).


 


Effective July 1, 2020, your salary will be
$16,000.00 per month, paid semi-monthly on the 15th & last day of each month. This is based on an assumption of an
average monthly effort of 80 hours.


 


All other terms, conditions and provisions of
the Offer of Employment remain unchanged by this amendment and are in full force and effect.


 


	 	Sincerely,
	 	 
	 	Sera Prognostics, Inc.
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Gregory Critchfield
	 	 	      Gregory Critchfield
	 	Its:	      Chairman, President, and CEO




 


	This Amendment is accepted and agreed
    to as of the date hereof:	 
	 	 
	/s/ Thomas Garite, MD	 
	Thomas Garite, MD	 
	 	 
	Dated:  	7/1/20
#### THOMAS et al., Respondents, v. HAYES et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

December 2, 1896.)

Action by Rebecca A. Thomas and others, as administrators, against Simon B. Hayes and others.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.
# C_2021472EN.01000301.xml

| 23.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 472/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 472/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10424 – FORESTAL ARAUCO / OTPPB / AGRICOLA NEUFUN JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 472/03)

On 6 October 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10424. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10424. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---