alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 12.2

   SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
                                     OFFICER

I, A. Cameron Richardson, Chief Financial Officer of Aurora Metals (BVI)
Limited, certify that:

1) I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Aurora Metals (BVI)
Limited;

2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

4) The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
     procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control
     over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this
     annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
     materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting;
     and

5) The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Company's auditors and the audit committee of the Company's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
     controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
     affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report
     financial information; and

     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control
     over financial reporting.


Date: June 25, 2007                    (s)A. Cameron Richardson
                                       ------------------------
                                       A. Cameron Richardson
                                       Chief  Financial  Officer
#### 305 East 24th Owners Corp. v Parman Co.

*504Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Carro, Milonas and Kassal, JJ.
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of InfoVista S.A. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:



|Date: September 30, 2004 | /s/GAD TOBALYName: Gad Tobaly Title: Chief Executive Officer            
|------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: September 30, 2004 | /s/PHILIPPE OZANIANName: Philippe Ozanian Title: Chief Financial Officer

---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 75 (Tuesday, April 18, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20806-20807]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9694]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Advisory Committee Meeting Notice

AGENCY: U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC).

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 10 (a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (P.L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following 
meeting:
    Name of Committee: Distance Learning/Training Technology 
Subcommittee of the Army Education Advisory Committee.
    Dates: 3-4 May 2000.
    Place: University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA).
    Time: 0830-1630 on 3 May 2000; 0830-1600 on 4 May 2000.
    Proposed Agenda: On May 3rd, Dr. Maha Ashour-Abdalla, Director of 
Science and Technology for UCLA's Center for Digital Innovation (CDI), 
will conduct presentations that focus on UCLA's initiatives in 
interactive education, administration and management of courses, and 
discussions of future programs planned for the CDI. Updates on The Army 
Distance Learning Program (TADLP) and discussions of Student Management 
and Adult Learning will complete the 2 day program.
    Purpose of the Meeting: The members will advise the Assistant 
Deputy Chief of Staff (ADCST), HQ Training and Doctrine Command 
(TRADOC), on matters pertaining to education and training technologies.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: All communications regarding this 
subcommittee should be addressed to Mr. Richard Karpinski, at 
Commander, Headquarters TRADOC, ATTN: ATTG-CF (Mr. Karpinski), Fort 
Monroe, VA 23651-5000; telephone number (757) 728-5531.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Meeting of the advisory committee is open to 
the public. Because of restricted meeting space, attendance will be 
limited to those persons who have notified the Advisory Committee 
Management Office in writing at least five days prior to the meeting of 
their intention to attend. Contact Mr. Karpinski (757-728-5531) for 
meeting agenda and specific locations.
    Any member of the public may file a written statement with the 
committee before, during, or after the meeting. To the extent that time 
permits, the committee chairman may allow public

[[Page 20807]]

presentations or oral statement at the meeting.

Gregory D. Showalter,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-9694 Filed 4-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-P
SCWC-17-0000036

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

STATE OF HAWAI#I,

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

CARDELL CHARLES, 

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-17-0000036; CASE NO. 1DTA-14-05659)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee Cardell Charles’s

application for writ of certiorari filed on March 9, 2018, is

hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, April 18, 2018.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-17-0000036

18-APR-2018

12:41 PM
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Coast GuardU.S. Department of Homeland Security

Search
Search

Search

-  Home    -  News Room             
  -  Reserve             
  -  Forcecom             
  -  Operations             
  -  Mission Support             
  -  Atlantic Area             
  -  Pacific Area             
  -  History 
-  Units    -  Organization             
  -  Coast Guard A to Z             
  -  Atlantic Area             
  -  Pacific Area             
  -  Force Readiness Command 
-  Leadership    -  Commandant’s Initiatives             
  -  Senior Leadership             
  -  Deputy Commandant for Operations             
  -  Deputy Commandant for Mission Support             
  -  Atlantic Area Commander             
  -  Pacific Area Commander             
  -  Reserve             
  -  Auxiliary 
-  Resources    -  CG Support             
  -  Legal      -  JoinCGJAG             
    -  Legal_Assistance        -  Find-A-Legal-Assistance-Lawyer             
      -  FAQ 
  -  Civil Rights             
  -  Work-Life             
  -  Administrative Law Judges      -  Virtual Hearing 
  -  Newsroom             
  -  Family             
  -  Library             
  -  CG Web Mail             
  -  Return 2 Service      -  FAQ 
-  Community    -  Art Program             
  -  Girl Scouts / Boy Scouts      -  Eagle Scout Recognition 
  -  Coast Guard Band             
  -  Coast Guard Cities             
  -  Honor Guard             
  -  JROTC      -  NEWS 
  -  Special Programs      -  Industry Academy        -  Contacts             
      -  2018 
  -  Trademark             
  -  Resources      -  History             
    -  CGC Eagle 
-  Mariners    -  National Vessel Documentation Center             
  -  National Maritime Center             
  -  National Pollution Funds Center      -  NRD        -  NRD_FAQs             
      -  Trustee_Links             
      -  NRD_DOCS             
      -  About_NRD_Funding 
  -  Boating Safety 
-  doing business		 
-  Join		 
-  Recruiting		 
-  contact		 
-  About		 

HomeResourcesAdministrative Law JudgesDecisionsALJ Decisions 2019ALJ Decisions

**ALJ Decisions: 2000**

 

**

                      - FOIA
                      - Privacy Policy
                      - MHS Notice of Privacy Practices
                      - Accessibility
                      - No FEAR
                      - Whistleblower Protection
                      - U.S. Department of Homeland Security
                      - DHS Office of Inspector General
                      - WhiteHouse.gov
                      - USA.gov

### Stay Connected

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### CARLETON et al., Appellants, v. LOMBARD AYRES & CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.

May 18, 1894.)

Action by J. Osgood Carleton and another against Lombard Ayres & Co.

Argued before VAN BRUNT, P. J., and FOLLETT and PARKER, JJ.

R. B. Moffert, for appellants.

A. B. Boardman, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs on opinion in same case. See 72 Hun, 254, 25 N. Y. Supp. 570.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2429 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2429

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
   any discharge of income contingent and income-based student loan 
                             indebtedness.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 19, 2015

 Mr. McDermott (for himself, Mr. Blumenauer, Mr. Langevin, Ms. Kaptur, 
   Mr. Rangel, Mr. Conyers, Ms. Norton, Mr. Vargas, Mr. DeFazio, Mr. 
 Honda, Mr. DeSaulnier, Mr. Hastings, Ms. Brownley of California, Mr. 
Van Hollen, Ms. Moore, Mr. Rush, Mr. Meeks, Mr. Hinojosa, Ms. Clark of 
  Massachusetts, Mr. Gutierrez, Mr. Danny K. Davis of Illinois, Mrs. 
     Capps, Mr. Cardenas, Mr. Welch, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. Larson of 
 Connecticut, Mr. Doggett, Mr. McNerney, Mr. Larsen of Washington, Mr. 
  Grijalva, Mr. Brendan F. Boyle of Pennsylvania, Mr. Cicilline, Mr. 
    Cummings, Mr. Kind, and Mr. Smith of Washington) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
   any discharge of income contingent and income-based student loan 
                             indebtedness.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Student Loan Tax Debt Relief Act''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME FOR DISCHARGE OF INCOME CONTINGENT 
              AND INCOME-BASED STUDENT LOAN INDEBTEDNESS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 108(f) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows:
            ``(1) In general.--In the case of an individual, gross 
        income does not include any amount which (but for this 
        subsection) would be includible in gross income by reason of 
        the discharge (in whole or in part) of any student loan if such 
        discharge was pursuant to--
                    ``(A) a provision of such loan under which all or 
                part of the indebtedness of the individual would be 
                discharged if the individual worked for a certain 
                period of time in certain professions for any of a 
                broad class of employers, or
                    ``(B) subsections (d)(1)(D) and (e)(7) of section 
                455 or section 493C(b)(7) of the Higher Education Act 
                of 1965 (relating to income contingent and income-based 
                repayment, respectively).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to discharges of indebtedness after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                          FIRST ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
                     LISTING OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

At June 30, 2004, the subsidiaries of the Company were as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAMES OF SUBSIDIARIES                                        ORGANIZED UNDER THE LAWS OF
---------------------                                        ---------------------------
<S>                                                          <C>
LNC Holdings, Inc.                                                      Nevada

USAuto Insurance Company, Inc.                                        Tennessee

Village Auto Insurance Company, Inc.                                   Georgia

Acceptance Insurance Agency, Inc.                                      Georgia

Alabama Acceptance Insurance Agency, Inc.                              Alabama

USAuto Services, Inc.                                                  Delaware

Transit Automobile Club Inc.                                          Tennessee

USAuto Holdings, Inc.                                                  Delaware

Acceptance Insurance Agency of Tennessee, Inc.                        Tennessee
</TABLE>
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

_________________________________ 

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD, 

Complainant 

vs. 

JONATHAN MICHAEL WILSON, 

Respondent. 

_________________________________ 

Docket Number 2023-0276 

Enforcement Activity No. 7730568 

CONSENT ORDER

Issued: December 19, 2023 

By Administrative Law Judge: Honorable Timothy G. Stueve 

Appearances:

Paul Lonardo 

Sector Houston/Galveston 

For the Coast Guard 

Jonathan Michael Wilson, Pro Se

For Respondent
CONSENT ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

On or about July 26, 2023, the parties in this case submitted a Motion for Approval of 

Settlement Agreement and Entry of Consent Order to be approved as a settlement of the case 

under 33 C.F.R. § 20.502. 

I have carefully reviewed the terms of the Settlement Agreement and find it is fair and 

reasonable and in substantial compliance with the requirements of 33 C.F.R. § 20.502. 

ORDER

 Upon consideration of the record, it is hereby ORDERED, the Settlement Agreement is 

APPROVED in full and incorporated herein by reference. This Consent Order shall constitute 

full, final, and complete adjudication of this proceeding. 

Done and dated December 19, 2023, at

Alameda, California

 

 

 _____________________ 

 Timothy G. Stueve 

 Administrative Law Judge

 U.S. Coast Guard
#### Maria O’Connor, Appellant, v Charles R. West et al., Respondents.

*1051Special Term properly denied plaintiff’s cross motion. Since the sufficiency of the amended complaint was not an issue decided in the prior motion, there was no need to transfer the case to the Justice who had heard that motion under CPLR 2221.

Special Term erred, however, in ruling that the slander cause of action as alleged in the amended complaint was time barred. Since the allegations in the amended complaint refer to the same parties and the same incident as alleged in the original complaint, the original complaint gave ample notice to defendant Dr. West "of the transactions, occurrences, or series of transactions or occurrences, to be proved pursuant to the amended pleading” (CPLR 203 [e]). Thus, the slander cause of action in the amended complaint is deemed to have been interposed on September 29, 1983 when the claim in the original pleading was made *(see, Caffaro v Trayna,*35 NY2d 245; *Johnson v Phillips,*115 AD2d 299; *Dooley v Bacardi Imports,*98 AD2d 993; *Citibank v Suthers,*68 AD2d 790). Since this is within one year from the December 1, 1982 incident in question, the slander cause of action against defendant Dr. West as alleged in the amended complaint should not have been dismissed as untimely, and that cause of action must be reinstated. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Joslin, J. — referral of motion.) Present— Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Denman, Green and Lawton, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles Fludd, Appellant.

Submitted April 23, 2007;

decided April 26, 2007

*941Motion for an extension of the time within which to apply for permission to appeal pursuant to CPL 460.20 granted and motion papers treated as a timely CPL 460.20 application.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 1999,AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                         1,455,051
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    1,635,646
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,555,109
<PP&E>                                         1,565,775
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,089)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 9,505,036
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,423,713
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     773,119
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   9,505,036
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3,830
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3,571
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,401)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,401)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,401)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v *780Julian Felder, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (O’Shaugnessy, J.), rendered October 31, 1985, convicting him of criminal mischief in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of those branches of the defendant’s omnibus motion which were to suppress physical evidence and statements made by him to law enforcement authorities.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Based upon the observations of the defendant’s conduct over a 45-minute period, the police had a reasonable basis for suspecting that he was engaged in criminal activity and were justified in briefly detaining him to make an inquiry *(see, People v Skinner,*48 NY2d 889; *People v De Bour,*40 NY2d 210). Moreover, under the circumstances, it was not unreasonable for the officers to approach the vehicle which the defendant had entered with their guns drawn *(see, People v Chestnut,*51 NY2d 14, *cert denied*449 US 1018; *People v McBean,*123 AD2d 401, *lv denied*69 NY2d 714; *People v Mateo,*122 AD2d 229, *lv denied*69 NY2d 952; *People v Finlayson,*76 AD2d 670, *lv denied*51 NY2d 1011, *cert denied*450 US 931). Thus, contrary to the defendant’s claim, his detention was lawful and the court correctly denied those branches of the defendant’s motion which were to suppress the evidence obtained as a result thereof. Thompson, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Harwood, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Secure Computing Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Timothy P. McGurran, Chief Operating Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2003, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/    TIMOTHY P.
MCGURRAN           
|Timothy P. McGurran                  
|President and Chief Operating Officer
|                                     
|August 9, 2004
#### MOONEY et al., Respondents, v. ROBINSON, Appellant.

(City Court of New York, General Term.

April 23, 1894.)

Action by Edmund L. Mooney and another against John Robinson. •

Argued before NEWBURGER and CONLAN, JJ.

J. Warren Lawton, for appellant.

Mooney & Shipman, for respondents.

NEWBURGER, J.

This is an action by the plaintiffs for professional •services. The answer of the defendant was a general denial. On the trial •of the action, the only question raised was that of employment. The plaintiffs claimed employment by an agent of the defendant, and a subsequent ratification by the defendant. The trial justice properly submitted the question of retainer to the jury, and, they having found for the plaintiff, the judgment must be affirmed, with costs.