alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2556 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to repeal the authorization 

for program development and implementation grants for coastal recreation water quality monitoring and notification, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 21, 2015 

Mr. SALMON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to repeal 

the authorization for program development and implementation grants for coastal recreation water quality 

monitoring and notification, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT AND IM4 PLEMENTATION GRANTS AUTHORIZATION. 

5 Section 406(b) of the Federal Water Pollution Con6 trol Act (33 U.S.C. 1346(b)) is amended by adding at the 

7 end the following new paragraph: 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2556 IH

1 ‘‘(5) REPEAL OF AUTHORITY.—The Adminis2 trator may not make a grant to a State or local gov3 ernment under this subsection after the date of en4 actment of this paragraph.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
exv10w2wb









Exhibit 10.2(b)



June 9, 2009




Fall River Capital LLC

11740 N. Port Washington Road

P.O. Box 40

Mequeon, WI 530.92



Attention: Mr. Charlie Wright





			
		 	Re:  Management Agreement Renewals




Dear Mr. Wright:



We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which
reference is made below (the “Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management
Agreements through June 30, 2010 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain
unchanged.





	 	•	 	CTA Capital LLC
	 
	 	•	 	Citigroup Emerging CTA L.P.




Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it
to the attention of Ms. Jennifer Magro at the address above or fax to 212-793-1986. If you have any
questions I can be reached at 212-559-5046.




	 	 	 	 	 
	Very truly yours,
	 
	 	 	 	 
	CITIGROUP MANAGED FUTURES LLC
	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Jennifer Magro
 

Jennifer Magro
	 	 
	 

	 	Chief Financial Officer & Director	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	FALL RIVER CAPITAL LLC
	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Robert Friedl
 

	 	 
	Print Name: Robert Friedl





JM/sr
Order entered August 23, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00466-CR

COREY ARLYN SMITH, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 296-82354-2014

ORDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to make findings of fact regarding whether appellant 

has been deprived of the reporter’s record because of ineffective counsel, indigence, or for any 

other reason.

 The trial court shall first determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal. If 

the trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute the appeal, it shall 

make a finding to that effect.

 If the trial court determines that appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, it shall next 

determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs 

for the reporter’s record. If appellant is entitled to proceed without payment of costs, the 

trial court shall make a finding to that effect. Moreover, if appellant is indigent, the trial 

court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective 

representation, which may include appointment of new counsel. If the trial court finds 

appellant is not indigent, it shall determine whether retained counsel has abandoned the 

appeal.
 The trial court shall next determine: (1) the name and address of each court reporter who 

recorded the proceedings in this cause; (2) the court reporter’s explanation for the delay 

in filing the reporter’s record; and (3) the earliest date by which the reporter’s record can 

be filed. 

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record, containing the written findings of fact, 

any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date 

of this order.

The appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeal 

shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, 

whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
## THE STATE OF TEXAS
MANDATE

TO THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF HUNT COUNTY, GREETINGS:
Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 25th
day of June, A.D. 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was determined;

and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Timothy Paul Bates, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee No. 06

- 14

- 00105

- CR

Trial Court No. CR1301437

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
We note that the appellant, Timothy Paul Bates, has adequately indicated his inability to
pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this
behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Cou rt of Appeals, with
the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 21st day of August , A.D. 2015

.

DEBRA K. AUTREY , Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A)
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF EAGLE USA AIRFREIGHT, INC. FOR THE
QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          32,538
<SECURITIES>                                    12,891
<RECEIVABLES>                                   80,266
<ALLOWANCES>                                       773
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               127,409
<PP&E>                                          32,762
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,362
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 161,697
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,271
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            19
<OTHER-SE>                                     121,407
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   161,697
<SALES>                                        144,876
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               144,876
<CGS>                                           81,553
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   81,553
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                51,153
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,702
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,954
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,748
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,748
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.40
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATION*

CERTIFICATION*

I, A. Stone Douglass, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report Form 10-K of Steakhouse Partners, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report; and

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's forth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting and;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Dated: April, 2004

                       BY:  /S/ A Stone Douglass
                       --------------------------
                       A Stone Douglass
                       President, Secretary and Director
                       (Serving as principal executive officer)
(8 Misc. Rep. 598.)

#### CHARDE et al. v. CITY OF BROOKLYN.

(City Court of Brooklyn, General Term.

May 28, 1894.)

Condemnation Proceedings—Award—Right of-Grantee.

A deed of land, including a portion which had been condemned for street purposes, gives the grantee the right to the award of the portion condemned, where the award was made before the deed was executed, but the possession of the grantor had not been disturbed.

Appeal from special term.

Action by Emily J. Charde and others against the city of Brooklyn.

There was a judgment in favon of plaintiffs, and defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

Argued before VAN WYCK and OSBORNE, JJ.

Albert G. McDonald, for appellant.

E. T. Payne, for respondents.

*391VAN WYCK, J.

An award was made for part of a lot taken for the widening of North Second street pursuant to the Laws of 1871, c. 559. For years thereafter, no steps were taken to actually widen the street. The owners used the land so taken,, andno claim was made for the awards so made. Both the city and the owners treated the matter as though no lands were taken, and no awards were made. While this was the existing condition, the owner of the lot involved in this action conveyed the whole of it, including the portion taken by the act of 1871. That such conveyance operated as an assignment of the award has already been decided by this court. Delap v. City of Brooklyn, 3 Misc. Rep. 22, 22 N. Y. Supp. 179; Englehardt v. City of Brooklyn, 3 Misc. Rep. 32, 21 N. Y. Supp. 777; Burkard v. City of Brooklyn, 6 Misc. Rep. 431, 26 N. Y. Supp. 1112. Judgment must be affirmed, with costs.
Exhibit 8.1
**Subsidiaries of Embraer – Empresa Brasileira de Aeronáutica S.A.**     **Jurisdiction of****Name** **Incorporation**Embraer Aircraft Holding, Inc – EAH Delaware, U.S.A.Embraer Aircraft Customer Services, Inc. – EACS Florida, U.S.A.Embraer Aircraft Marketing Corp. – EMC Florida, U.S.A.Embraer Aircraft Maintenance Services, Inc. – EAMS Delaware, U.S.A.Embraer Services, Inc. – ESI Delaware, U.S.A.Embraer Engineering Services, Inc. – EEI Delaware, U.S.A.Indústria Aeronáutica Neiva Ltda. – Neiva BrazilEmbraer Finance Ltd. – EFL Cayman Islands, BWIEmbraer Merco S/A – EMS UruguayELEB-Embraer Liebherr Equipamentos do Brasil S.A. BrazilTrumpeter, Inc. Delaware, U.S.A.Embraer Aviation Europe SAS – EAE FranceEmbraer Aviation International – EAI FranceEmbraer Australia Pty Ltd. – EAL AustraliaEmbraer Credit Ltd. – ECL Delaware, U.S.A.Embraer Europe SARL – EES FranceEmbraer Representation, LLC – ERL Delaware, U.S.AHarbin Embraer Aircraft Industry Company, Ltd. – HEAI ChinaEmbraer Spain Holding Co., SL – ESH SpainECC Investment Switzerland AG – SWIN SwitzerlandECC Insurance & Financial Company Ltd. Cayman Islands, BWIECC Leasing Company Ltd. IrelandCanal Investments LLC Delaware, U.S.A.
LNITED STATES OF AMERICA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARI)

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

Complainant

vs.

HUNTERTHOMAS RUTKOSKI

Res?ondent

Dockot Number 2023-000 I

Enforcement Activity No.76 14538

CONSENT ORDERAPPROVIN G SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

On January ll,2023,the parties in this case submitted a Motion for Approval of a

Settlement Agreement and Entry of Consent Order to be approved as a setflement of the case

under 33 C.F.R. $ 20.502.

I have carefully reviewed the terms of the Settlement Agreement and find that it is fair

and reasonable and in substantial compliance with the requirements of 33 C.F.R. $ 20.502.

ORDER

Upon consideration of record, it is hereby ORDERED that the Settlement Agreement is

APPROVED in firll and incorporated herein by reference. This Consent Order shall constitute

flrll, final, and complete adjudication of this proceeding.

Done and Dated January 19,2023 at

New Orleans, LA

HON. BRIAN J. CURLEY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
<PAGE>   1

                                  EXHIBIT 11.1


                        YIELDUP INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                        THREE MONTHS     THREE MONTHS       NINE MONTHS        NINE MONTHS 
                                           ENDED             ENDED             ENDED              ENDED
                                        SEPTEMBER 30,     SEPTEMBER 30,     SEPTEMBER 30,      SEPTEMBER 30, 
                                            1996             1995               1996              1995
                                        ------------     -------------     -------------       -----------
<S>                                     <C>              <C>               <C>                 <C>
Net Loss                                $ (948,656)       $ (493,641)       $(2,477,148)       $ (899,287)
                                        ==========        ==========        ===========        ==========

Common Stock                             3,407,111         1,534,366          3,406,156         1,534,366
Preferred Stock                                 --           299,744                 --           299,744
                                        ----------        ----------        -----------        ----------
                                         3,407,111         1,834,110          3,406,156         1,834,110

Number of common stock issued and
stock options granted in
accordance with SAB No. 83                      --           136,480                 --           136,480
                                        ----------        ----------        -----------        ---------- 
                Total                    3,407,111         1,970,590          3,406,156         1,970,590
                                        ==========        ==========        ===========        ==========

Net loss per share                      $    (0.28)       $    (0.25)       $     (0.73)       $    (0.46)
                                        ==========        ==========        ===========        ==========
</TABLE>




                                       15
# Equal Employment Opportunity Data Posted Pursuant to the No FEAR Act

The Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation (No FEAR) Act increases federal agency accountability for acts of discrimination and for reprisal against employees for whistle blowing. In support of the Act, former DHS Secretary Michael Chertoff issued a memo to all DHS Employees reiterating the Department’s commitment to the No FEAR Act of 2002.

Title III of the No FEAR Act requires federal agencies to post statistical data relating to equal employment opportunity (EEO) complaints filed against them. DHS posts the required cumulative statistical data for EEO complaints for the entire Department. A link to data posted by the Department for DHS and for USCIS is provided below. This data is updated on a quarterly basis.

For further information about the No FEAR Act data, or more information about the Federal Sector EEO Complaints Process, please call the Office Equal Opportunity and Inclusion at 1-866-860-8885.

## Quarterly Report 2024

USCIS No FEAR Report Q2 FY 2024 (PDF, 1.2 MB)

## Quarterly Report 2023

USCIS No FEAR Report Q4 FY 2023 (PDF, 315.16 KB)

## Quarterly Report 2022

USCIS No FEAR Report Q4 FY 2022 (PDF, 1.2 MB)

## Quarterly Report 2021

USCIS No FEAR Report Q4 FY 2021 (PDF, 300.52 KB)

01/10/2024

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
# C_2021309EN.01000701.xml

| 2.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 309/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 309/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10351 — BDT Capital Partners/Culligan Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 309/07)

On 14 July 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10351. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10351. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, John
C. Corey, President and Chief Executive Officer, of Stoneridge, Inc. (the
“Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  the
report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the second quarter ended June 30, 2009
(“the Report”) which this certification accompanies fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and





(2)  the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ John C. CoreyJohn
      C. Corey, President and Chief Executive OfficerAugust
      4, 2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit 13.1

CHINA MOBILE LIMITED

Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned, WANG Jianzhou, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of China Mobile Limited (the
Company), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 7, 2010



/s/    WANG JianzhouName:

WANG JianzhouTitle:

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or
as a separate disclosure document.



1
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HUMBERTO BECERRA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-75122

Agency No. A075-499-740

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 10, 2011** 

Before: BEEZER, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Humberto Becerra, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order sustaining the government’s

appeal from an immigration judge’s decision granting his application for

cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review

FILED

JAN 20 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-75122

de novo questions of law, Mercado-Zazueta v. Holder, 580 F.3d 1102, 1104 (9th

Cir. 2009), and we grant the petition for review.

The BIA rejected Becerra’s contention that he was entitled to impute his

mother’s admission as a lawful permanent resident in order to satisfy the sevenyear period of continuous residence required for cancellation of removal. See 8

U.S.C. § 1229b(a)(2). However, the BIA did not have the benefit of our decision

in Mercado-Zazueta, 580 F.3d at 1113-16, in which we recognized the ongoing

validity of Cuevas-Gaspar v. Gonzales, 430 F.3d 1013 (9th Cir. 2005) (a parent’s

admission for permanent residence is imputed to unemancipated minor children

residing with the parent for the purpose of satisfying the required period of

continuous residence under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a)(2)). We therefore remand to the

BIA to reconsider Becerra’s appeal.

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.