alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
tt

U S DEPX}fl;?,iiII?'"T AMERICA

u N' r E; ili ;;.:;y^ r.ili j Ec u Rr r y

LTNITED STATES COAST GUARD

Complainant

il vs.

BRADFORD KELLY

Respondent

Docket Number 2023-01 38

Enforcement Activity No. 7662462

CONSENT ORDER

Issued: Mav 15. 2023

Bv Administrative Law Judqe: Honorable Timothv G. Stueve

APPearances:

Eric Bauer

USCG S&R National Center of Expertise

For the Coast Guard

Bradford Kelly, Pro Se

For Respondent
CONSENT ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

On or about May 5,2O23, the parties in this case submitted a Motion for Approval of

Settlement Agreement and Entry ofConsent Order to be approved as a settlement ofthe case

under 33 C.F.R. $ 20.502.

I have carefully reviewed the terms of the Settlement Agreement and find it is fair and

reasonable and in substantial compliance with the requirements of 33 C.F.R. $ 20.502.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the record, it is hereby ORDERED, the Settlement Agreement is

APPROVED in full and incorporated herein by reference. This Consent Order shall constitute

full, final, and complete adjudication ofthis proceeding.

Done and dated May 15,2023, at

Alameda, Califomia

Timothy G. Stueve

Administrative Law Judge

U.S. Coast Guard
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the directio n of the Court.

January 23 , 2019 

# Order

Clerk January 23 , 2019

1 58309 ( 11 )

GRIEVANCE ADMINISTRATOR,

Petitioner,

v SC: 158309

ADB: 15

- 000049

- GA

ANDREW LEO SHIRVELL,

Respondent

.

___________________________________ /

Upon de novo review by the entire Court in accordance with MCR 2.003(D)(2)(b)

, the Court orders that respondent’s motion to disqualify Justice Elizabeth T. Clement from

participating in the decision of this case is DENIED for the reason that respondent has not

alleged facts establishing an appearance of impropriety or a serious risk of actual bias from

her participation in th e case. MCR 2.003(C)(1)(b).

C LEMENT

, J., did not participate in the decision on this disqualification motion

.

C AVANAGH , J., did not participate due to her prior service as a member of the

Attorney Grievance Commission

.
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

Each of theundersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, in hiscapacity as an officer of SPACEHAB, Incorporated (“SPACEHAB”), that, to thebest of his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of SPACEHAB on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended December 31, 2006, fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperation of SPACEHAB.

 
| Date:  February 13, 2007 |   |                                              |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                                    |   |                                              |
|                                    |   |                                              |
|                                    |   |  /s/Thomas B.  Pickens, III                  |
|                                    |   | Thomas B. Pickens, III                            |
|                                    |   | President and Chief Executive Officer             |
|                                    |   |                                              |
|                                    |   |                                              |
|                                    |   |                                              |
|                                    |   |  /s/Brian K.  Harrington                     |
|                                    |   | Brian K. Harrington                               |
|                                    |   | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SPACEHABand will be retained by SPACEHAB and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

32

----
Exhibit 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with Mass Megawatts Wind Power, Inc.'s (the Company) Annual
Report on Form 10KSB for the year ended April 30, 2003 ("Report"), the
undersigned certifies that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  and

     2.   The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
          of  the  Company


Dated:    3/10/04                      By:  /s/ Jonathan Ricker
        --------------                     ---------------------------------
                                           Jonathan Ricker
                                           Chief Executive Officer and
                                           Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2021439EN.01001101.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 29.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 439/11 |

---

Notification of a concentration

(Case M.10407 – AIP / ALVANCE DUNKERQUE TARGET BUSINESS)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 439/07)

1.

On 18 October 2021, the Commission received notification of a concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2021439EN.01001101-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | American Industrial Partners Capital Fund VII, LP (US), an investment fund managed by American Industrial Partners (collectively referred to as ‘AIP’), and |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Alvance Aluminium Dunkerque SAS and Alvance Aluminium Service SAS (together, ‘Alvance Dunkerque Target Business’, France), |

AIP acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Alvance Dunkerque Target Business. The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

The same concentration was already notified to the Commission on 16 July 2021 and 26 July 2021, but the notification was subsequently withdrawn on 19 July 2021 and 27 August 2021, respectively.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | AIP is a private equity firm focused on buying and improving industrial businesses. |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Alvance Dunkerque Target Business is a primary aluminium producer, which operates an aluminium smelter in Loon-Plage near Dunkerque (France). |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2021439EN.01001101-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10407 – AIP / Alvance Dunkerque Target Business

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2021439EN.01001101-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2021439EN.01001101-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the amended annual report of Trycera
Financial, Inc. (formerly Whitelight Technologies, Inc.) (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A-1 for the year ended December 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned principal executive officer of the
Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results
     of operations of the Company.


Date:  February 25, 2005

/s/ Matthew S. Kerper
Matthew S. Kerper, President
(Principal executive officer)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7763

FRANKIE L. MCCOY, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

A. DIGGS, 4 to 12 a.m. shift commander; J.

BACOAT, Sergeant, A-Block duty officer; S.

HUTCHSON, Sergeant,A&B Block duty officer;

SERGEANT JOBE,A&B Block duty officer; UNKNOWN NAMED DEFENDANTS, Each defendant is sued

individually and in his official capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-97-

3621-L)

Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: May 26, 1998

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frankie L. McCoy, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, a Maryland inmate, appeals the district court's

order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under

28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. McCoy v. Diggs, No. CA-97-3621-L (D. Md. Nov. 7,

1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

    We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-79273) of Juno Online Services, Inc. of our
report dated January 19, 2000, except as to the follow-on offering described in
Note 13, which is as of February 14, 2000, relating to the financial statements,
which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report dated January 19, 2000 relating to the
financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
New York, New York
February 15, 2000
**EXHIBIT
      32**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the annual report of Capital Growth Systems, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lee
      Wiskowski, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, I, Douglas Stukel, the
      Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Derry L. Behm, the Chief
      Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my
      knowledge, pursuant to l8 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      April 14, 2006




By: /s/
      Lee Wiskowski


Name:  Lee
      Wiskowski


Title:  Co-Chief
      Executive Officer




By: /s/
      Douglas Stukel


Name:  Douglas
      Stukel


Title:  Co-Chief
      Executive Officer




By: /s/
      Derry L. Behm


Name:  Derry
      L.
      Behm


Title:  Chief
      Financial and Accounting Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




The
      foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as an exhibit to the Report and
      is
      not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
      document.
# C_2023125EN.01016701.xml

| 5.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 125/167 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 125/167

---

P9_TA(2022)0304

Conclusion of the amendments to the International Sugar Agreement, 1992 ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 13 September 2022 on the draft Council decision concerning the conclusion of the amendments to the International Sugar Agreement, 1992 (07978/2022 — C9-0181/2022 — 2022/0082(NLE))

(Consent)

(2023/C 125/16)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (07978/2022), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (07978/2022),

| — | having regard to the draft amendments to the International Sugar Agreement, 1992 (07978/2022), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft amendments to the International Sugar Agreement, 1992 (07978/2022),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 207(4), first subparagraph, and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a) (v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C9-0181/2022), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 207(4), first subparagraph, and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a) (v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C9-0181/2022),

| — | having regard to Rule 105(1) and (4), and Rule 114(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 105(1) and (4), and Rule 114(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade (A9-0229/2022), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade (A9-0229/2022),

| 1. | Gives its consent to the conclusion of the amendments to the agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

2.

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Behlin, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Egitto, J.), rendered November 11, 1985, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The trial court properly denied the defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict *(see,*CPL 330.30 [3]), which he grounded on the alleged recantation by one of the People’s witnesses of certain portions of her trial testimony. At thé hearing conducted on the defendant’s motion, this witness asserted her privilege against self-incrimination. The defendant thus failed to sustain his burden *(see,*CPL 330.40 [2] [g]), and, in any event, the proof of the defendant’s guilt apart from the allegedly recanted testimony was overwhelming *(cf.,*CPL *836330.30 [3]). Moreover, we find the sentence imposed to be neither harsh nor excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80).

We find the defendant’s remaining contentions, including those contained in his supplemental *pro se*brief, to be either unpreserved for our review or without merit. Mangano, J. P., Thompson, Lawrence and Harwood, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Si Chen, the Chief Executive Officer of AMERICAN LORAIN CORPORATION (the Company), DO HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1. The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. Information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operation of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this 16th day of April 2008.

| | /s/ Si  Chen                 
| | -----------------------------
| | Si Chen                      
| | Chief Executive Officer      
| | (Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to American Lorain Corporation and will be retained by American Lorain Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to §18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

---
---

---

# EXHIBIT 13.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Tikcro Technologies Ltd. (the
Company) for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), I, Izhak
Tamir, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       
          the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       
          the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 25, 2006

/s/ Izhak TamirIzhak Tamir
Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer



---

---
# C_2021244EN.01001801.xml

| 22.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 244/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 244/18

---

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2013/184/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/998, and in Regulation (EU) No 401/2013, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1000 concerning restrictive measures against Myanmar/Burma

(2021/C 244/07)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in Annex I to Council Decision 2013/184/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/998 (2), and in Annex IV to Council Regulation (EU) No 401/2013 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1000 (4) concerning restrictive measures against Myanmar/Burma.

The Council of the European Union has decided that the persons and entities that appear in the above mentioned Annexes should be included in the list of persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2013/184/CFSP and Regulation (EU) No 401/2013 concerning restrictive measures against Myanmar/Burma. The grounds for the listing of the persons concerned appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 401/2013 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Myanmar/Burma, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4b of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned lists should be reconsidered, before 1 November 2021, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1.C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1.C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council’s periodic review, in accordance with Article 12 of Decision 2013/184/CFSP and Article 4i(4) of Regulation (EU) No 401/2013.

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 111, 23.4.2013, p. 75.

(2)  OJ L 219 I, 21.6.2021, p. 45.

(3)  OJ L 121, 3.5.2013, p. 1.

(4)  OJ L 219 I, 21.6.2021, p. 57.

---