alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Jon A. DeLuca, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FiberNet Telecom Group, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterlyreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: May 14, 2004
|Exhibit 99.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Each of the undersigned hereby
certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Coast Casinos, Inc. (the Company),
for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | o | the
Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | o | the
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Dated: May 13, 2003
|-------------------

|                                                                    | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/  Michael J. Gaughan                                             | 
|Michael J. GaughanChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer | 

|                                                       | 
|------------------------------------------------------ | 
|/s/  Gage Parrish                                      | 
|Gage ParrishVice President and Chief Financial Officer | 

|A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Coast Casinos, Inc. and
will be retained by Coast Casinos, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      26,513,000
<SECURITIES>                                39,467,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,864,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            82,164,000
<PP&E>                                      14,499,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              99,158,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       37,529,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                99,158,000
<SALES>                                     36,010,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            36,010,000
<CGS>                                       14,342,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,342,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,233,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,119,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,114,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,114,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19
        

</TABLE>
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2593 

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to require identification and 

description on the website of the Federal Communications Commission 

of items to be decided on authority delegated by the Commission. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 1, 2015 

Mr. LATTA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to require identification and description on the website of the Federal 

Communications Commission of items to be decided on 

authority delegated by the Commission. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION OF ITEMS 

4 TO BE DECIDED ON AUTHORITY DELEGATED 

5 BY THE COMMISSION. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5(c) of the Communica7 tions Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 155(c)) is amended by add8 ing at the end the following: 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2593 IH

1 ‘‘(10) Not later than 48 hours before the time when 

2 an order, decision, report, or action is made or taken pur3 suant to delegation under paragraph (1), such order, deci4 sion, report, or action shall be identified and briefly de5 scribed on the Internet website of the Commission, unless 

6 the authority to which the delegation is made for good 

7 cause finds that such identification and description are 

8 likely to lead to a result described in a paragraph of sec9 tion 552b(c) of title 5, United States Code. This para10 graph shall not apply with respect to an order, decision, 

11 report, or action that— 

12 ‘‘(A) does not receive a delegated authority 

13 number pursuant to the procedures of the Commis14 sion; 

15 ‘‘(B) is made or taken on authority delegated to 

16 an administrative law judge; or 

17 ‘‘(C) is made or taken to address an immediate 

18 threat to health or safety that constitutes an emer19 gency requiring an expedited response from the 

20 Commission.’’. 

21 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

22 this section shall apply with respect to an order, decision, 

23 report, or action made or taken after the date that is 90 

24 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### PHI QUOC TRAN, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-74461.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*627Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 25, 2011.

Brenda Diaz, Phung, Miyamoto & Diaz, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

Before: FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Phi Quoc Tran, a native and citizen of Vietnam, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen and de novo questions of law and constitutional claims. *Mohammed v. Gonzales,*400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir.2005). We deny in part, and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Tran’s motion to reopen on the ground that Tran is ineligible for relief under former section 212(c), 8 U.S.C. § 1182(c) (repeal effective April 1, 1997), because his ground of deportability lacks a statutory counterpart in a ground of inadmissibility. *See*8 C.F.R. §§ 1003.44(a), 1212.3(f)(5). Tran’s legal and constitutional challenges to this determination are unavailing. *See Aguilar-Ramos v. Holder,*594 F.3d 701, 706 (9th Cir.2010).

We lack jurisdiction to consider the BIA’s October 5, 2005, order denying Tran’s motion to reconsider because he failed to timely petition for review of that decision. *See Singh v. INS,*315 F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th Cir.2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Petroleum Engineers**

 

MHA Petroleum Consultants, Inc. does hereby consent to the use of its reports relating to the proved oil and gas reserves of GeoPetro Resources Company and to the reference to the firm as an expert in the Form 10-K Annual Report being filed by GeoPetro Resources Company.

 
| /s/ JOHN   W. ARSENAULT           |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                                   |   |
| MHA   Petroleum Consultants, Inc. |   |
| John   W. Arsenault                    |   |
| Vice   President                       |   |
|                                   |   |
| Denver,   CO                           |   |
| March 31,   2011                  |   |

 

----
Argued and submitted December 4, 1998,

affirmed January 6, 1999

#### William F. DURIG, June Wright and John Randolph Durig, *Respondents, v.*WASHINGTON COUNTY, *Respondent below, and*TOWNSEND FARMS, INC., *Petitioner.*

(LUBA No. 97-262; CA A103829)

969 P2d 401

Richard A. Uffelman argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

Lisa E. Lear argued the cause for respondents. With her on the brief were John M. Junkin and Bullivant Houser Bailey.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Deits, Chief Judge, and Armstrong, Judge.

PER CURIAM

*37PER CURIAM

Petitioner Townsend Farms, Inc., seeks review of LUBA’s remand of a Washington County hearings officer’s approval of petitioner’s application to construct four residential buildings and an ancillary structure for seasonal farm-worker housing in an exclusive farm use zone. Petitioner’s principal assignment is directed against LUBA’s conclusions that an applicable comprehensive plan provision prohibits the “community water system” that petitioner proposes for the facility, that the provision is an approval criterion for the application and that the hearings officer erred by failing to apply the provision as an approval criterion. We agree with LUBA’s conclusions.

Petitioner makes four other assignments of error. None requires extensive discussion. Two of them challenge LUBA’s determinations that certain findings of the hearings officer are unsupported by substantial evidence. Both assignments are academic, however. Neither fact that the hearings officer found can result in the approval of the application, given the conclusion that the water system does not comply with the plan provision.

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)). 

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than May 3, 2000. 

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis**                     (Randall C. Sumner, Vice President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:                 

*1. Sara J. Harrison,*                     Little Rock, Arkansas; to retain voting shares of Southern State Bancshares, Inc., Malvern, Arkansas, and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of Southern State Bank, Malvern, Arkansas.                 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 13, 2000. 

Robert deV. Frierson,

Associate Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 00-9678 Filed 4-17-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF MEADOWCRAFT, INC. FOR THE QUARTER ENDED APRIL 30, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,036
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     33,738
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                99,988
<PP&E>                                          86,744
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,923
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 159,681
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           75,428
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           197
<OTHER-SE>                                      59,436
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   159,681
<SALES>                                         97,923
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                97,923
<CGS>                                           74,129
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   74,129
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,999
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,027
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,768
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,280
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,488
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,488
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .28<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .28<F1>
<FN>
<F1>The earnings per share ("EPS") information has been prepared in accordance
with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 128, Earnings Per Share. As
such, basic EPS and diluted EPS have been entered in place of primary and fully
diluted, respectively.
</FN>


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 10 (Friday, January 14, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2436-2437]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-942]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-36,745]


Muskin Leisure Products, Inc., Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania; Notice 
of Revised Determination on Reconsideration

    By letter of October 18, 1999, the International Union of 
Electronic, Electrical, Salaried, Machine, and Furniture Workers, AFL-
CIO, requested administrative reconsideration of the Department's 
denial of eligibility for workers and former workers of the subject 
firm to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA).
    On September 2, 1999, the workers of the subject firm producing 
above ground swimming pools, liners, filters and accessories and parts 
were denied TAA because the ``contributed importantly'' test of the 
Group Eligibility Requirements of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, 
was not met. The notice was published in the Federal Register on 
October 14, 1999 (64 FR 77750).
    The company presented new evidence regarding increasing imports of 
pool components from foreign sources during the relevant time period. 
The company will increase its reliance on imports of articles like or 
directly competitive with those that were produced at the Wilkes-Barre 
plant.

Conclusion

    After careful consideration of the new facts obtained on 
reconsideration, it is concluded that the workers of Muskin Leisure 
Products, Inc., Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, were adversely affected by 
increase imports of articles like or directly competitive with those 
produced at the subject firm.

    ``All workers of Muskin Leisure Products, Inc., Wilkes-Barre, 
Pennsylvania, who became totally or partially separated from 
employment on or after August 13, 1998 through two years from the 
date of this issuance are eligible to apply for adjustment 
assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.''


[[Page 2437]]


    Signed at Washington, DC this 7th day of January 2000.
Grant D. Beale,
Program Manager, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-942 Filed 1-13-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
LEARN MORE

An employer cannot 

retaliate or "get even" 

with an employee for 

exercising their EEO/EO 

rights.

COAST GUARD

ANTI-RETALIATION

STOP RETALIATION BEFORE IT STARTS
# C_2021413EN.01000101.xml

| 12.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 413/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 413/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10426 – Lone Star/Green-City Immobilier)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 413/01)

On 5 October 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10426. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10426. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---