alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                           7,127
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,127
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,774
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,100
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,127
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,573
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,044
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (21,617)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (21,617)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (21,617)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.02)



</TABLE>
##### 



O2Diesel Corporation
(A Development Stage Company) Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATIONS OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Alan Rae as Chief Executive Office, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of O2Diesel Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:  (a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
prepared;(b)
    {omitted pursuant to the guidance of Release No. 33-8238 (June 5, 2003)}(c)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures presented in this annual report and presented in this annual
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures based on such evaluation; and(d)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal controls
over financial reporting that occurred during O2Diesel Corporations most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, registrants internal controls over
financial reporting; and procedures. 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrants Independent Registered Accounting Firm
and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):  (a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting. Date: March 30, 2005 /s/ Alan R. RaeAlan R. RaeChief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted).

I, Elizabeth
McLaughlin, Chief Executive Officer of Hot Topic, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Hot Topic,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other information included in
this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

Date: March 28, 2007



/s/    ELIZABETH
MCLAUGHLINElizabeth McLaughlin Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to Hot Topic, Inc. and will be retained by Hot Topic, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

I, James McGinty, Chief Financial Officer of Hot Topic, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual
report on Form 10-K of Hot Topic, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

Date: March 28, 2007



/s/    JAMES
MCGINTYJames McGinty Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to Hot Topic, Inc. and will be retained by Hot Topic, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-20-00054-CR

JAMES HAUGHT, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from County Criminal 

Court No. 5

of Denton County (F18-3232-158)

September 16, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Chief 

Justice Sudderth

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By __/s/ Bonnie Sudderth________________

 Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
I

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD.

Complainant,

VS

DAVID PATzuCK BEAMS,

Respondent.

Docket Number: 2023-0080

Enforcement Activity ID: 7 617727

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CONSENT ORDER

Issued: September 22,, 2023

of Chief Administrative Law : Hon. Walter J. Brudzinski

dppearances:

For the Coast Guard

LT Nicholas P. C ap,,zzi

USCG Marine Safety Detachment Homer

For the Respondent

David Patrick Beams, pro Se
CONS ENT ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

On September 15.2023,the parties in this case submitted a Motion for Approval of a

Settlement Agreement and Entry ofConsent Order to the Administrative Law Judge for approval

under 33 C.F.R. $ 20.502.

I have carefrrlly reviewed the terms of the Settlement Agreement and find that it is fair.

reasonable, and in substantial compliance with the requirements of33 C.F.R. $ 20.502.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the record, it is hereby ORDERED that the Settlement Agreement

is APPROVED in full and incorporated herein by reference. This Consent Order shall

constitute full, final, and complete adjudication of this proceeding.

ue// s4-4J.

Hon. Walter .l- Brudzinski

Chief Administrative Law Judge

United States Coast Guard

Date: September 22, 2023
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Chinawe.com Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Man
Keung Wai, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and result of
               operations of the Company.

/s/ Man Keung Wai
-------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Chinawe.com Inc. and will be
retained by Chinawe.com Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
```
#### William F. Tintle, Jr., Appellant-Respondent, v Jane E. Tintle, Respondent-Appellant. (Action No. 1.) Jane E. Tintle, Respondent-Appellant, v William F. Tintle, Jr., Appellant-Respondent. (Action No. 2.)

consolidated matrimonial actions, (1) the husband appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (England, R.), dated February 28, 1986, as directed him to pay the wife the sum of $62,500 in counsel fees and the sum of $5,000 in experts’ fees, and (2) the wife cross-appeals from so much of the same judgment as directed the husband to pay only $62,500 in counsel fees and $5,000 in experts’ fees.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, in the exercise of discretion, by deleting from the seventeenth decretal paragraph thereof the words "Sixty-Two Thousand, Five Hundred ($62,500.00)”, and substituting therefor the words "Fifteen Thousand ($15,000.00)”; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

We find that an award of $15,000 in counsel fees to the wife is appropriate under the facts of this case, based on the *81financial circumstances of the respective parties and in view of what we perceive to be the reasonable value of the services rendered *(see,*Domestic Relations Law § 237). In this regard, we note that the application for counsel fees submitted by the wife’s attorney, wherein the sum of $150,000 was sought, tends to strain credulity.

However, the Special Referee did not abuse her discretion by requiring the husband to pay the wife the sum of $5,000, representing his contribution toward the fees for the wife’s expert witnesses.

Accordingly, the judgment is modified by reducing the counsel fee award to the extent indicated. Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.
#### THOMPSON, Respondent, v. VILLAGE OF GOWANDA, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 16, 1896.)

Action by Almira Thompson against the village of Gowanda.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 1 3 - 6282

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ,

Plaintiff

- Appell ee ,

v. ELSA G. MONTECINOS ,

Defendant

- Appell ant .

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at C olumbia
. Cameron McGowan Currie , District Judge. ( 3: 08

- cr - 00 590

- CMC

- 17 ; 3:12

- cv - 0 1978

- CMC )

Submitted : May 30 , 2013 Decided: June 5, 2013
Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismiss ed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Elsa G. Montecinos , Appellant Pro Se. Jimmie Ewing, Mark C. Moore, Stanley D. Ragsdale, John David Rowell , Assistant United States Attorney s , James Chris Leventis, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2

PER CURIAM:

Elsa G. Montecinos seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on h er 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude
that Montecinos has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dis miss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials3

before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Harbor Global Company Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen G. Kasnet, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Dated:    March | 16, 2006
|--------------- | --------



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|/s/    STEPHEN G. KASNET                 
|Stephen G. Kasnet Chief Executive Officer
1 The Honorable Jerry W. Cavaneau, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 01-3098

___________ Henry J. Maxwell, Jr., * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Arkansas. Tyson Foods, Inc. * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: July 1, 2002 Filed: July 5, 2002

___________ Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Henry J. Maxwell, Jr., appeals from the district court’s 1 judgment, issuedfollowing a bench trial, in favor of Tyson Foods, Inc., in his employmentdiscrimination action brought under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ submissions on appeal, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny Mr. Maxwell’s pending motions.-2- A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ramon Irizzary, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bonomo, J.), rendered October 27, 1983, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The sentencing court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the defendant’s request to withdraw his plea on the grounds that he was mentally unfit, that he was innocent and that he was forced to plead guilty because of his attorney’s incompetence, was without merit (CPL 220.60 [3]; *People v Pica,*112 AD2d 325; *People v Stubbs,*110 AD2d 725, 727; *People v Kelsch,*96 AD2d 677, 678). In view of the complete allocution of the defendant’s plea before the same Judge who presided at sentencing and the fact that the defendant made no showing in support of his conclusory assertions, Criminal Term properly proceeded to impose sentence without making any further inquiry *(see, People v Brown,*110 AD2d 902, 903). Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Weinstein, Kunzeman and Spatt, JJ., concur.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT B.N.R., the mother , Appellant,

v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and GUARDIAN AD LITEM , Appellee s
. No s . 4D 17

- 1467 and 17

- 1468 [ August 10 , 2017 ] Consolidated appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Howard H. Harrison, Senior Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 50

- 2013

- DP

- 300209

- XXXX

- MB and 50

- 2015

- DP

- 300243

- XXXX

- MB. Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, and Paul O’Neil, Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Sara E. Goldfarb, Sanford, for appellee Guardian ad Litem Program. Meredith K. Hall, Bradenton, for appellee Department of Children and Fa milies.

P ER C URIAM

. Affirmed.

G ROSS , D AMOORGIAN and C ONNER , JJ., concur.

* * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit
      23.2





CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








As
      independent registered public accountants, we hereby consent to the
      incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-127720 and
      333-136119 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement No. 333-136121 on Form S-8,
      of
      our report dated March 27, 2007, relating to the consolidated balance sheet
      of
      O2Diesel Corporation as of December 31, 2006, and the related consolidated
      statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash
      flows for the year then ended and for the period October 14, 2000 (inception)
      through December 31, 2006, included in the 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
      of
      O2Diesel Corporation.








/s/
      Mayer
      Hoffman McCann P.C.





Plymouth
      Meeting, Pennsylvania


March
      27,
      2007
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Southern Copper Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, OscarGonzalez Rocha, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Oscar Gonzalez Rocha              |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   | Oscar Gonzalez Rocha                  |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                                  |

 

April 30,2008

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by section 906 has beenprovided to Southern Copper Corporation and will be retained by Southern CopperCorporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

55

----