alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

PERICOM SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report of Pericom Semiconductor Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2007 (the Report), I, Alex C. Hui, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

May 9, 2007



By:

/s/ Alex C. HuiAlex C. HuiChief Executive OfficerPericom Semiconductor Corporation
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Juan Pablo VEGA, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-50436

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 11, 2011.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Walter Mabry Reaves, Jr., Law Office of Walter M. Reaves, Jr., Waco, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, GARZA and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Juan Pablo Vega, Jr., represented by appointed attorney Alberto M. Ramon, appeals from his conviction of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine. He contends solely that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel.

The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Vega’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; such a claim generally “cannot be resolved on direct appeal when the claim has not been raised before the district court since no opportunity existed to develop the record on the merits of the allegations.” *United States v. Cantwell,*470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir.2006) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); *see Massaro v. United States,*538 U.S. 500, 504, 123 S.Ct. 1690, 155 L.Ed.2d 714 (2003) (“In light of the way our system has developed, in most cases a motion brought under § 2255 is preferable to direct appeal for deciding claims of ineffective assistance.”).

Vega’s appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2. Attorney Ramon is WARNED that he “ha[s] no duty to bring frivolous appeals; the opposite is true[,]” *United States v. Burleson,*22 F.3d 93, 95 (5th Cir.1994), and that frivolous appeals in the future may subject counsel to sanctions.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dean Bennett, Appellant.

Submitted May 29, 2007;

decided June 5, 2007

Motion for an extension of the time within which to apply for permission to appeal pursuant to CPL 460.20 granted and motion papers treated as a timely CPL 460.20 application.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          15,567
<SECURITIES>                                    52,597
<RECEIVABLES>                                      172
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                69,506
<PP&E>                                           3,900
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,908
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  72,034
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,632
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           135
<OTHER-SE>                                      68,947
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    72,034
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   140
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,053
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  11
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,958)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,958)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,958)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.44)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

PAUL JOSEPH BEGNOCHE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 512 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 30th day of January, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A (the Report) to the Annual Report of Harbor Global Company Ltd. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald H. Hunter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Dated: August 18, 2005



/s/ DONALD H. HUNTERDonald H. Hunter Chief Financial Officer




This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 32.1

                CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This certification set forth below is hereby made solely for the purpose of
satisfying the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
may not be relied upon or used for any other purposes.

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Investors Capital Holdings, Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Theodore E. Charles, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.


Date:  February 11, 2005                    By: /s/ Theodore E. Charles
                                            ---------------------------
                                            Theodore E. Charles
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

                                       25
---

Exhibit 31





Certifications


SECTION 302





I, Jonathan Ricker, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Mass Megawatts Wind Power, Inc.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and





cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;





4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:





a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;





b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and





c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;





5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and





b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and





6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.








Mass Megawatts Wind Power, Inc.Date: August 7, 2009
By:
/s/ Jonathan RickerJonathan RickerTitle: Chairman, Chief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
# C_2021201EN.01001501.xml

| 28.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/15

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10278 – EQT/Cerba)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 201/12)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | EQT Fund Management S.à r.l. (‘EQT’, Luxembourg), |
| --- | --- |

—

EQT Fund Management S.à r.l. (‘EQT’, Luxembourg),

| — | Cerba Group (‘Cerba’, France). |
| --- | --- |

—

Cerba Group (‘Cerba’, France).

EQT acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Cerba.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | for EQT: investment fund manager for the investment fund EQT IX, which seeks to make investments primarily in Europe. The EQT funds’ portfolio companies are active in a variety of industries and sectors, including in the pharmaceutical sector, in elderly care and veterinary services, |
| --- | --- |

—

for EQT: investment fund manager for the investment fund EQT IX, which seeks to make investments primarily in Europe. The EQT funds’ portfolio companies are active in a variety of industries and sectors, including in the pharmaceutical sector, in elderly care and veterinary services,

| — | for Cerba: global and diversified laboratory services company operating within clinical pathology in France and internationally. It is currently active in 40 countries across five continents. Cerba is active in three main business lines: (i) specialty testing; (ii) routine testing and; and (iii) clinical trial. It also offers veterinary biology and well-being services. |
| --- | --- |

—

for Cerba: global and diversified laboratory services company operating within clinical pathology in France and internationally. It is currently active in 40 countries across five continents. Cerba is active in three main business lines: (i) specialty testing; (ii) routine testing and; and (iii) clinical trial. It also offers veterinary biology and well-being services.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10278 – EQT/Cerba

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.1

                             METRO NETWORKS, INC.

                          SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

                                  FISCAL 1997

  The following is a list of subsidiaries of Metro Networks, Inc. (the Parent)
and their state of incorporation as of December 31, 1997. Unless otherwise
noted, all subsidiaries are 100% owned by the Parent Company.

  Metro Networks, Inc.--Incorporated in the State of Delaware

  Metro Networks Communications, Inc., formerly Metro Traffic Control, Inc.--
  Incorporated in the State of Maryland

  Washington News Networks, Inc.--Incorporated in the District of Columbia
  (80% owned)
#### In the Matter of Nathaniel H., Appellant.

— In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Gartenstein, J.), dated November 12, 1985, which, upon a fact-finding order of the Family Court, Rockland County (Stanger, J.), dated September 12, 1985, made upon an admission, finding that the appellant had committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of burglary in the second degree, placed him with the Division for Youth, Title II, for a period not to exceed 12 months. This appeal brings up for review the fact-finding order dated September 12, 1985.

Ordered that the order is reversed, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, without costs or disbursements, the fact-finding determination is vacated, and the petition is dismissed.

The appellant argues, the respondent concedes, and we agree that reversible error was committed at the fact-finding hearing. The court’s allocution was not sufficient to ensure that the appellant’s admission was knowingly and intelligently made and that the appellant was adequately informed of his rights prior to admitting the allegations of the petition. Since the appellant’s placement will have ended by the time this order and decision is handed down, we have dismissed the petition *(see, Matter of Yolanda C.,*118 AD2d 778). Mangano, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Fiber, JJ., concur.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 15-2401

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Juan Rodriguez-Ponce

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

____________

 Submitted: November 16, 2015

Filed: November 18, 2015

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Juan Rodriguez-Ponce directly appeals after he pleaded guilty to federal

drug-conspiracy and cash-smuggling charges, and the district court sentenced him

1

The Honorable Dean Whipple, United States District Judge for the Western 1

District of Missouri.
within the calculated Guidelines range. His counsel has moved to withdraw, and has

filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), raising challenges to

the reasonableness of the sentence that was imposed.

After careful de novo review, see United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th

Cir. 2010), we will enforce the appeal waiver that is included in Rodriguez-Ponce’s

written plea agreement, because the claims raised in this appeal fall within the scope

of the waiver, Rodriguez-Ponce’s testimony at the plea hearing showsthat he entered

into the plea agreement and the appeal waiver knowingly and voluntarily, and

dismissing the appeal based on the waiver will not result in a miscarriage of justice,

see United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-90 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc). Further,

having independently reviewed the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75

(1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues that fall outside the scope of the appeal

waiver.

This appeal is dismissed, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________

-2-
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Nicholas Schacht, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Learning Tree International, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 29, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of the operations of Learning Tree International, Inc.



Date: September 24, 2007

By:

/s/ NICHOLAS R. SCHACHTName:

Nicholas R. SchachtTitle:

Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|  | R.K. MacLeod*, B.S., P.Eng., PresidentH.J. Helwerda*, B.Sc., P.Eng., FEC, ExecutiveV.P.J.L. Chipperfield*,B.Sc., P.Geol., Senior V.P.D.W.C. Ho*, B.A.Sc., P.Eng., V.P. EngineeringG.D. Robinson*,B.Sc., P Eng., V.P., EngineeringD.J. Carsted*, CD, B.Sc., P.Geol., V.P., GeoscienceC.P. Six, B.Sc., P.Eng., V.P., EngineeringK.P. McDonald, B Comm., C.A., CFO,            Corporate Secretary              *Directors |
|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (i) | Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2011; and, |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | Registration Statement on Form F-9 (File No. 333-177401) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
|--------|------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Sincerely,                     |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
|                           |   |
| SPROULE ASSOCIATES LIMITED     |   |
|                           |   |
|                           |   |
| /s/ Harry J. Helwerda          |   |
| Harry J. Helwerda, P.Eng., FEC |   |
| Executive Vice-President and   |   |
| Director                       |   |

----