alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3

                                Petsec Energy Ltd
                                  Certification
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
                                      Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Petsec Energy Ltd, an Australian public limited liability
company (the "Company"), hereby certifies that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the
"Report") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated:     June 27, 2003

Name:      Terrence Norman Fern
Title:     Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter
63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report
or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been
provided to Petsec Energy Ltd and will be retained by Petsec Energy Ltd and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Collins *v.*City of Long Island.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.*

May 12, 1890.)

Taxation—Assessment—Non-Resident Owners.

Under Laws N. Y. 1880, c. 339, providing that tax assessments on land in Long Island City shall not be invalidated “by reason of any error, mistake, or insufficiency in the owner’s name, ” and that the tax shall be a “lien on the property assessed until discharged by payment, ” an assessment of the land of a non-resident is not vitiated by being assessed to unknown owners.

Appeal from judgment on report of referee.

*168Action by Benjamin Collins against Long Island City to vacate taxes on lands in defendant city for the years 1884, 1885, and 1886. The lands were vacant and unoccupied. There was judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

Argued before Barnard, P. J., and Dykman and Pratt, JJ.

*W. J. Foster,*for appellant. *E. Wott Anable,*for respondent.

Barnard, P. J.

The case shows that the assessments were made to unknown owners, and to one Zolikoffer. The lands were then owned by Mary Norwood, a non-resident of Queens county. There is no difference, as to assessments upon lands in Long Island City, between lands of residents and non-residents. No separate column is required for the two classes of persons. Chapter 461, tit. 6, Laws 1871. The entry of the wrong name as owner did not invalidate the tax. No assessments, which shall be made for any taxes in Long Island City, shall be invalidated “ by reason of any error, mistake, or insufficiency in the owner’s name.” The tax is a “lien on the property assessed, until discharged by payment.” Chapter 339, Laws 1880. By these laws, it is provided that no tax upon lands shall be invalidated in consequence of the omission of the name of the rightful owner. When the assessment under this act was made against an estate of a deceased person, it was held that the tax was good. Haight v. Mayor, etc., 99 N. Y. 280, 1 N. E. Rep. 883. The judgment should therefore be reversed, and a new trial granted at special term, costs to abide event. All concur.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2620 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 24, 2015 

Received 

AN ACT 

To amend the United States Cotton Futures Act to exclude 

certain cotton futures contracts from coverage under 

such Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2620 RDS

1 SECTION 1. EXCLUDING CERTAIN COTTON FUTURES CON2 TRACTS FROM COVERAGE UNDER UNITED 

3 STATES COTTON FUTURES ACT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c)(1) of the United 

5 States Cotton Futures Act (7 U.S.C. 15B(c)(1)) is amend6 ed— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘except that any cotton futures 

8 contract’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘except that— 

9 ‘‘(A) any cotton futures contract’’; 

10 (2) in subparagraph (A) (as designated by 

11 paragraph (1)), by striking the period at the end 

12 and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

13 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub14 paragraph: 

15 ‘‘(B) any cotton futures contract that per16 mits tender of cotton grown outside of the 

17 United States is excluded from the coverage of 

18 this paragraph and section to the extent that 

19 the cotton grown outside of the United States 

20 is tendered for delivery under the cotton futures 

21 contract.’’. 

22 (b) APPLICATION.—The amendments made by sub23 section (a) shall apply with respect to cotton futures conVerDate Sep 11 2014 22:21 Jun 25, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2620.RDS H2620

asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 2620 RDS

1 tracts entered into on or after the date of the enactment 

2 of this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 23, 2015. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF LEVEL BEST GOLF, INC. FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   60,105
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    358,043
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               427,148
<PP&E>                                         104,020
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,989
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 808,067
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,743,293
<BONDS>                                         47,380
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,246
<OTHER-SE>                                    (985,852)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   808,067
<SALES>                                         70,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                70,200
<CGS>                                           19,587
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  762,948
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                38,343
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              38,343
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (731,091)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (731,091)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (731,091)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.23)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 74 (Monday, April 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 20473]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9436]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Complementary & Alternative Medicine; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the Cancer Advisory Panel for Complementary and Alternative Medicine.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(9)(B), Title 5 U.S.C., as 
amended because the premature disclosure of program documents--PAC and 
the discussions would likely to significantly frustrate implementation 
of recommendations.

    Name of Committee: Cancer Advisory Panel for Complementary and 
Alternative Medicine.
    Date: April 19, 2000.
    Time: 2:30 PM to 5:00 PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate the Gonzalez Regiment.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bldg. 
31, Room 5B5B, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Richard Nahin, PhD, Executive Secretary, Cancer 
Advisory Panel for Complementary, and Alternative Medicine, NCCAM, 
NIH, 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 31, Room 5B37, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-594-2013.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

    Dated: April 6, 2000.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-9436 Filed 4-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21


                        Subsidiaries of the Registrant


               G.P. Snyder Marketing Services, Inc.    Delaware
               Snyder Marketing Services, Inc.         Delaware
               Snyder Direct Services, Inc.            Delaware
               Snyder Complete Target Marketing
               Solutions, Inc.                         Nevada
               MMD, Inc.                               New Jersey
               Sampling Corporation of America         Illinois
               American List Corporation               Delaware
               American Student List Co., Inc.         New York
               Brann Holdings Limited                  United Kingdom
               Brann Limited                           United Kingdom
               Bounty Group Holdings Limited           United Kingdom
               Bounty Holdings Limited                 United Kingdom
               Halliday Jones Sales Limited            United Kingdom
               GEM Communications Inc.                 Connecticut
               Rapid Deployment Group Limited          United Kingdom
               Rapid Deployment Limited                United Kingdom
               PharmFlex, Inc.                         New Jersey
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DOMINIC GRACI and STEPHANIE GRACI,

Appellants,

v.

CITIBANK, N.A., as Trustee for AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE 

ASSETS TRUST 2006-4 MORTGAGE-BACKED PASS-THROUGH 

CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-4,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-2302

[February 16, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Paige Hardy Gillman, Judge; 502018CA008256.

Jeff Barnes of W.J. Barnes, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellants. 

Kimberly S. Mello and Arda Goker of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Orlando, 

for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, CONNER and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 16.1.

                           0'CONNER, MALONEY & COMPANY
                          Certified Public Accountants
              466 MAIN STREET, WORCESTER, MASSACHUSETTS 01608-2370
                 Telephone 508/757-6391 Telecopier 508/797-9307

DONALD  F.  0.  MALONEY,  CPA
DONALD F. O. MALONEY, JR., CPA
JOSEPH  F.  GRIMALDO,  CPA
ARTHUR  T.  BORB,  CPA
PAUL  F.  SCZEPANSKI,  CPA
ANTHONY D. ROZEVICIUS, CPA
ROBERT  V.  MALONEY,  CPA
ROBERT  G.  SOULAY,  CPA
CAROL  J.  MALONEY,  CPA

                                  July 26, 2001

Securities and Exchange Commission Washington, D.C. 20549

Re:    Mass  Megawatts  Power,  Inc.
       11  Maple  Avenue
       Shrewsbury,  MA  01545
       Form  BK  Current  Report

To  Whom  It  May  Concern:

     We  have  reviewed the Form 8K Current Report of the above named registrant
dated  July  18,  2001.

     This  will  confirm  to  you that we agree with the statements made in that
report  and  in  particular that the reason for the change in our appointment as
independent  accountants  was  due  to  the  fact  that  a  partner in this firm
purchased  an  equity  position in Mass Megawatts giving rise to an independence
issue.

                                        Very  truly  yours,

                                        /s/  Donald  P.O.  Maloney
                                        Donald  P.O.  Maloney

DFOM/mn  enclosure


<PAGE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 29, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-50424

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MANUEL OROPEZA-ANGELES,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas 

USDC No. 2:03-CR-544-1-AML

--------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Manuel Oropeza-Angeles (Oropeza) appeals from his 48-month

sentence and conviction following his guilty plea to illegal

reentry following deportation. 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a),(b). Oropeza’s

brief can be construed as challenging, for the first time on

appeal, the district court’s mandatory application of the

Sentencing Guidelines in violation of United States v. Booker,

543 U.S. 220 (2005), an argument that has been termed “Fanfan

error.” United States v. Walters, 418 F.3d 461, 463 (5th Cir.
2

2005). 

Fanfan error meets the first two prongs of the plain error

analysis. United States v. Valenzuela-Quevedo, 407 F.3d 728, 733

(5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 267 (2005). Because Oropeza

has failed to demonstrate that the error affected the outcome in

the district court, his claim of Fanfan error does not warrant

relief. See id. at 733-34.

Oropeza’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998).

Although Oropeza contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly

decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule

Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466

(2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis

that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States v.

Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct.

298 (2005). 

Oropeza concedes that his argument appears to be foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but he also argues, for the first time on

appeal, that Almendarez-Torres is distinguishable because the

Supreme Court in Apprendi, 530 U.S. at 487-88, limited its holding

in Almendarez-Torres to cases in which the defendant specifically

admitted the predicate felony used to enhance his sentence. He

also argues, for the first time on appeal, that he did not admit to

the prior felony conviction and that the evidence was insufficient

at sentencing to support his enhanced sentence under § 1326(b).
3

Apprendi did not limit Almendarez-Torres’s holding to cases in

which the defendant admits having committed the predicate felony

prior to pleading guilty. See Apprendi, 530 U.S. at 487-90.

Oropeza has not demonstrated error, plain or otherwise. 

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 21054]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9730]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 3291]


Revocation of December 21, 1999 Determination under Section 
2(b)(1)(B) of the Export-Import Bank Act of 1945, as Amended

    Pursuant to section 2(b)(1)(B) of the Export-Import Bank Act of 
1945, as amended, and Executive Order 12166 of October 19, 1979, the 
determination dated December 21, 1999, with respect to Export-Import 
Bank financing in connection with cases APO70202XX and APO67280XX is 
hereby revoked.
    This determination shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: March 31, 2000.
Madeleine K. Albright,
Secretary of State, U.S. Department of State.
[FR Doc. 00-9730 Filed 4-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-23-P
#### Bonifacio SALADO BELLO, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-71411.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 25, 2011.

David Neumeister, Judith Seeds Miller, Law Office of David Neumeister, Bakersfield, CA, for Petitioner.

Jennifer R. Khouri, Kristin A. Moresi, Trial, OIL, Russell John Verby, Trial, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. LeFevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Bonifacio Salado Bello, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s conclusion on discretionary grounds that Salado Bello lacks good moral character. *See Bazua-Cota v. Gonzales,*466 F.3d 747, 749 (9th Cir.2006) (abuse of discretion challenges to discretionary decisions, even if recast as due process claims, do not constitute colorable constitutional claims).

We also lack jurisdiction to consider Salado Bello’s contentions that the agency denied him due process by failing to consider his positive equities and by not allowing his son to testify, because he failed to raise those issues before the BIA. *See Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004); *Abebe v. Mukasey,*554 F.3d 1203, 1208 (9th Cir.2009) (en banc) (when a petitioner files a brief before the BIA, the petitioner will “be deemed to have exhausted only those issues he raised and argued in his brief before the BIA”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
EXHIBIT 10.1


                               SAVILLE SYSTEMS PLC
                       AMENDMENT TO 1995 SHARE OPTION PLAN


               Adopted by the Board of Directors on April 24, 1997

                 Approved by the Shareholders on April 24, 1997


Section 4 as amended and  restated.  Section 4 of the 1995 Share  Option Plan of
Saville  Systems PLC shall be deleted in its entirety and the following shall be
substituted in its place:

4.       Stock Subject to the Plan.

         Subject to  adjustment  as  provided  in Section 15 below,  the maximum
number  of  Ordinary  Shares  which  may be  issued  and sold  under the Plan is
5,000,000  shares. If an option granted under the Plan shall expire or terminate
for any reason without having been  exercised in full,  the  unpurchased  shares
subject to such option shall again be available  for  subsequent  option  grants
under the Plan.  If shares  issued upon exercise of an option under the Plan are
tendered to the Company in payment of the  exercise  price of an option  granted
under the Plan,  such tendered  shares shall again be available  for  subsequent
option  grants under the Plan;  provided,  that in no event shall such shares be
made  available  for  issuance to  Reporting  Persons or pursuant to exercise of
Incentive Stock Options.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 74 (Monday, April 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20489-20490]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9512]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND HUMANITIES


Cooperative Agreement for a Project Titled: U.S. Audiences/
International Work

AGENCY: National Endowment for the Arts.

ACTION: Notification of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Endowment for the Arts is requesting proposals 
leading to one (1) award of a Cooperative Agreement for a two year 
pilot project to devise, implement, document, and assess models for the 
translation of contemporary performance work from Asia, Africa, or 
Latin America that has a significant text-based element, and the 
development of educational strategies that will help audiences 
understand the cultural and social context from which the work 
emanates. The initiative will also require implementation of a process 
for dissemination of information about the models, and facilitation of 
the

[[Page 20490]]

touring of the identified works to small and mid-sized communities. 
Eligibility to apply is limited to tax exempt organizations. Endowment 
funding will be $200,000. A one-to-one match is required. Eligibility 
to apply for the Cooperative Agreement is limited to tax exempt 
organizations. Those interested in receiving the solicitation package 
should reference Program Solicitation PS 00-04 in their written request 
and include two (2) self-addressed labels. Verbal requests for the 
Solicitation will not be honored. It is anticipated that the Program 
Solicitation will also be posted on the Endowment's Web site at  http://www.arts.gov.

DATES: Program Solicitation PS 00-04 is scheduled for release 
approximately May 2, 2000 with proposals due on May 31, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Requests for the Solicitation should be addressed to the 
National Endowment for the Arts, Grants & Contracts Office, Room 618, 
1100 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20506.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Hummel, Grants & Contracts 
Office, National Endowment for the Arts, Room 618, 1100 Pennsylvania, 
Ave., NW., Washington, D.C. 20506 (202-682-5482).

William I. Hummel,
Coordinator, Cooperative Agreements.
[FR Doc. 00-9512 Filed 4-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M