alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021058EN.01003101.xml

| 18.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 58/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 58/31

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10142 — Pamplona Capital/Signature Foods)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 58/02)

On 12 February 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10142. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10142. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### Lance Bing, Appellant, v Fairfield Presidential Management Corp., Also Known as Presidential Fairfield Corp., et al., Respondents. Fairfield Presidential Associates, Respondent, v Lance Bing, Appellant.

Submitted March 12, 2007;

decided May 1, 2007

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the Court of Appeals does not have jurisdiction to entertain this motion for leave to appeal from the order of the Appellate Division entered in these actions commenced in the Civil Court of the City of New York *(see*NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b] [7]; CPLR 5602 [a]).
#### John S. Griffith v. F. N. Gary.

Unless the liability of an indorser has been fixed by bringing suit against the maker, as required by the 1st section of the act of March 20,1848, he cannot be made liable. (Paschal’s Dig., Art. 229, Note 290.)

The court judicially knows that the district courts hold two terms each year.

Error from Smith. The case was tried before Hon. Reuben A. Reeves, one'of the district judges.

The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.

*Robertson Herndon,*for plaintiff in error,

cited Elliott v. Wiggins, 16 Tex., 597.

*M. A. Long Stephen Reaves,*for defendant in error,

contended that the ordinance Ho. 11, section 6, in relation to limitation, controlled the case. (Paschal’s Dig., Art. 4631a.)

Morrill, C. J.

—On April 28,1860, one Sanford executed to Griffith his note for $1,150, payable January 1, 1861, which Griffith assigned to Gary before due.

On January 2, 1866, the assignee brought suit against the maker and indorser. The petition contains ho allegations showing why suit was not.brought at the first term of the court to which it could be brought.

Defendant, Sanford, made no defense, and, as he is not a party to the record in this court, no further notice of the proceedings as to him will be had. The indorser, Griffith, excepted to the sufficiency of the petition to hold him liable, and pleaded specially that he had not become liable as indorser, because suit had not been brought at the first term of the court or at the second term of the court after the right of action accrued, &c. (Paschal’s Dig., Art. 229.)

Judgment was rendered against both maker and indorser, *164and the latter appeals, and assigns as error, that the court held him liable,.as indorser, to pay the debt.

We judicially know that the district court of each and every county is held, or required to be held, twice in each year; and, therefore, the furthest possible time from and after any given date that a court will be held is six months; unless, therefore, suit in the case at bar were brought previous to July, 1861, or at the next term of the court, and good reason shown why it was not'brought previously, the defendant was,not liable. And as the suit was not instituted against the maker of the note for two terms of the court subsequent to the time the note fell due, and as there was no legal impediment to bringing suit during this term, the judgment of the district court, so far as relates to the indorser, Griffith, is reversed, and the suit dismissed.

Ordered accordingly.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2572 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2572

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prevent the extension of 
 the tax collection period merely because the taxpayer is a member of 
    the Armed Forces who is hospitalized as a result of combat zone 
                               injuries.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 22, 2015

  Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. McDermott, and Mr. Sam 
Johnson of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prevent the extension of 
 the tax collection period merely because the taxpayer is a member of 
    the Armed Forces who is hospitalized as a result of combat zone 
                               injuries.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Wounded Warrior Tax Equity Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. PREVENTION OF EXTENSION OF TAX COLLECTION PERIOD FOR MEMBERS OF 
              THE ARMED FORCES WHO ARE HOSPITALIZED AS A RESULT OF 
              COMBAT ZONE INJURIES.

    (a) In General.--Section 7508(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(3) Collection period after assessment not extended as a 
        result of hospitalization.--With respect to any period of 
        continuous qualified hospitalization described in subsection 
        (a) and the next 180 days thereafter, subsection (a) shall not 
        apply in the application of section 6502.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxes assessed before, on, or after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
TINITED STATES OF AMERICA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURJTY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

Address of Administrative Law Judge Docketing Cenler

AIJ Docketing Center

U.S. Custom House

40 South Gay Street, Room 414

Baltimore, MD 2 I 202-4022

Email: alidt'r:kctcenterrt uscq.tril

Phone: (410) 962-5100

Toll Free: (866) 612-7524 [6IA-SKCG]

Fax (410) 962-1746

Toll Free Fax: (877) 243-3453 ICGE-FILEI

COMPLAINANT:

L]NITED STATES COAST GUARD

RESPONDENT: Ronald James Burgett, ll DOCKET NUMBER ]0].] (XX).I

WITHDRAWAL FROM DOCKET CG ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY NUMBER

75+25 8-l

The Coast Guard initiated an administrative proceeding by filing a Complaint on January 5,

2023, seeking Revocation of Respondent's Merchant Mariner Credential.

On January 23, 2023,lhe Coast Guard filed a Notice of Withdrawal from docket as

The Coast Guard has confirmed through the TSA, Respondent is not a security threat and not a

Security Risk as described by 46 U.S.C. $ 7703(5). The TWIC of RONALD JAMES

BURGETT I, was revoked by TSA, not the TWIC of RONALD JAMES BURGETT II.

This matter is removed from the docket and closed without prejudice effective this date

Done and Dated January 23,2023 at

Baltimore, MD

Lauren M. Meus

Hearing Docket Clerk

U.S. Coast Guard

By Direction of the Chief Administrative Law

Judge
| 1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2013 of Sun Bancorp, Inc. (the “registrant”); |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   Date:  April 30, 2014 |   |   | /s/ Sidney R. Brown                                                    |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                        |   |   | Sidney R. BrownChairman, Interim President and Chief Executive Officer |

----
#### Sherff, Respondent, *v.*New York Cent. & H. R. R. Co., Appellant.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department.*

July 1, 1890.)

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6617

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MARCUS DION MCKOY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CR-99-57-HO, CA-02-144-H) Submitted: August 14, 2003 Decided: August 21, 2003 Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marcus Dion McKoy, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Jude Darrow, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Marcus Dion McKoy seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. McKoy cannot appeal this order unless a circuit judge or justice issues a certificate of appealability, and a certificate of appealability will not issue absent a “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A habeas appellant meets this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, , 123 S. Ct. 1029, 1039 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude McKoy has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Order entered July 25, 2014

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 13

- 01511

- CR

ANTHONY SHANE KILLEB REW, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 416

- 81884

- 2012



### O RDER

The Court DENIES appellant’s July 23, 2014 motion for extension of time to file

appellant’s brief as moot. The appellant brief filed pursuant to the Court’s July 9, 2014 order is

deemed timely filed.

/s/ DAVID EVANS

JUSTICE
IIB 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2458 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 2, 2016 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 5351 Lapalco Boulevard in Marrero, Louisiana, as the ‘‘Lionel R. Collins, Sr. Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2458 RFS

1 SECTION 1. LIONEL R. COLLINS, SR. POST OFFICE BUILD2 ING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 5351 Lapalco Boulevard in 

5 Marrero, Louisiana, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Lionel R. Collins, Sr. Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lionel R. Collins, Sr. 

11 Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 1, 

2016. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### McCABE et al., Respondents, v. SCOTT, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 16, 1896.)

Action by Frank L. McCabe and John B. McCabe, against Allen D. Scott, as receiver, etc.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.
H. R. 2496 

One Hundred Fourteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the sixth day of January, two thousand and fifteen 

An Act 

To extend the authorization for the replacement of the existing Department of 

Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Denver, Colorado, to make certain improvements in the Veterans Access, Choice, and Accountability Act of 2014, and for 

other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Construction Authorization and 

Choice Improvement Act’’. 

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION FOR MAJOR MEDICAL 

FACILITY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Veterans Affairs may carry 

out the replacement of the existing Department of Veterans Affairs 

Medical Center in Denver, Colorado, in fiscal year 2015, in an 

amount not to exceed $900,000,000. 

(b) LIMITATION ON OBLIGATION OF FUNDS.—Notwithstanding 

section 8104(c) of title 38, United States Code, or any other provision 

of law, funds may not be obligated or expended for the project 

described in subsection (a) in an amount that would cause the 

total amount obligated for that project to exceed the amount specified in the law for that project (or would add to total obligations 

exceeding such specified amount). 

SEC. 3. CLARIFICATION OF DISTANCE REQUIREMENT FOR EXPANDED 

AVAILABILITY OF HOSPITAL CARE AND MEDICAL SERVICES 

FOR VETERANS THROUGH THE USE OF AGREEMENTS WITH 

NON-DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS ENTITIES. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 101(b)(2) of the Veterans Access, 

Choice, and Accountability Act of 2014 (Public Law 113–146; 38 

U.S.C. 1701 note) is amended— 

(1) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ‘‘(as calculated based 

on distance traveled)’’ after ‘‘40 miles’’; and 

(2) in subparagraph (D)(ii), by striking subclause (II), and 

inserting the following new subclause (II): 

‘‘(II) faces an unusual or excessive burden in 

traveling to such a medical facility of the Department based on— 

‘‘(aa) geographical challenges; 

‘‘(bb) environmental factors, such as roads 

that are not accessible to the general public, 

traffic, or hazardous weather; 
H. R. 2496—2 

‘‘(cc) a medical condition that impacts the 

ability to travel; or 

‘‘(dd) other factors, as determined by the 

Secretary.’’. 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by subsection 

(a) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act 

and apply with respect to care or services provided on or after 

such date. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
**Exhibit 12.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

**PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

 

**AS ADOPTED BYSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, PaulThomas, as Chief Financial Officer of Premier Foods plc (the “Company”) herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 
| (1)    |   | the  accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F for the period ending  December 31, 2002 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange  Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
| (2)    |   | the  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                      |

 
|   | By:           | /s/ PAUL THOMAS  |   |
|--------|---------------|------------------|--------|
|   | Name:         | Paul Thomas      |
|   | Title:        | Finance Director |
|   |
| Date:  | June 30, 2003 |
|        |               |                  |        |  |  |

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toPremier Foods plc and will be retained by Premier Foods plc and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 10 (Friday, January 14, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 2381]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-954]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 011100A]


New England Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The New England Fishery Management Council (Council) is 
scheduling a public meeting of its Capacity Committee. Recommendations 
from the Committee will be brought to the full Council for formal 
consideration and action, if appropriate.

DATES: The meeting will be held on February 2, 2000, at 9:30 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Rhode Island Department of 
Environmental Management Foundry Offices, 235 Promenade Street, 
4<SUP>th</SUP> Floor, Room C, Providence, Rhode Island; telephone: 
(401) 222-6605 ext. 2412.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul J. Howard, Executive Director, 
telephone: (978) 465-04922.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Committee will continue its exploration 
of fishing capacity issues. The Committee will begin to review 
available information that may indicate the status of capacity in New 
England fisheries. Committee members will also begin to prioritize the 
problems caused by excess capacity in New England fisheries, and will 
begin to identify possible solutions to identified problems. The 
Committee will also review the number of permits held by vessels in 
order to characterize the amount of flexibility that fishermen have to 
move between fisheries.
    Although non-emergency issues not contained in this agenda may come 
before the Council for discussion, those issues may not be the subject 
of formal Council action during this meeting. Council action will be 
restricted to those issues specifically listed in this document and any 
issues arising after publication of this document that require 
emergency action under section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery 
Conservation and Management Act, provided the public has been notified 
of the Council's intent to take final action to address the emergency.

Special Accommodations

    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Paul J. Howard, New England Fishery Management 
Council, 50 Water Street, Newburyport, Massachusetts 01950; telephone: 
(978) 465-0492 at least 5 days prior to the meeting dates.

    Dated: January 11, 2000.
Richard W. Surdi,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 00-954 Filed 1-13-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F