alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

              In connection with the Quarterly Report of Chinawe.com Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Vivian
Chu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Vivian Chu
Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2003

























A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Chinawe.com Inc. and will be
retained by Chinawe.com Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT21.1**

GeoPetro ResourcesCompanySubsidiary List — May 31, 2006

**Subsidiaries 100% owned by GeoPetro Resources Company**

Redwood Energy Company, a Texas corporation

GeoPetro Canada Ltd., an Alberta company

GeoPetro Alaska LLC (“**GeoPetro Alaska**”), an Alaska limitedliability company

**Subsidiaries 95% owned by GeoPetro Resources Company**

Redwood EnergyProduction, L.P. (“**Redwood LP**”),a Texas limited partnership

**Subsidiaries 50% owned by GeoPetro Resources Company**

CG Xploration Inc. (“**CG Xploration**, a Delaware corporation

**Subsidiaries 12% owned by GeoPetro Resources Company**

Continental-GeoPetro(Bengara II) Ltd. (“**C-G Bengara**”),a British Virgin Islands company

**Subsidiaries 5% owned by Redwood Energy Company**

Redwood EnergyProduction, L.P. (“**Redwood LP**”),a Texas limited partnership

----
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pyramid Breweries Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George
Hancock, Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adOpted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ GEORGE HANCOCK

George Hancock
Interim Chief Executive Officer
August 16, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Pyramid Breweries Inc. and will be retained by Pyramid Breweries
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
# C_2021021EN.01000501.xml

| 20.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 21/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 21/5

---

Special Report 1/2021

‘Resolution planning in the Single Resolution Mechanism’

(2021/C 21/05)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report 1/2021 ‘Resolution planning in the Single Resolution Mechanism’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu

---
Exhibit 10.6 Agreement and Plan of Merger, effective May 13, 2021, among us, Dakota Holdco Corp., Dakota Merger Sub 1 Inc., Dakota Merger Sub 2 Inc. and JR Resources Corp.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 181 (Wednesday, September 22, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 52641]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-20529]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XB437]


Fisheries of the South Atlantic; South Atlantic Fishery 
Management Council; Public Meetings

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of Seminar Series presentation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The South Atlantic Fishery Management Council (Council) will 
host a presentation on Tuna Management Strategy Evaluation via webinar 
October 12, 2021.

DATES: The webinar presentation will be held on Tuesday, October 12, 
2021, from 1 p.m. until 2:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: 
    Meeting address: The presentation will be provided via webinar. The 
webinar is open to members of the public. Information, including a link 
to webinar registration will be posted on the Council's website at: 
https://safmc.net/safmc-meetings/other-meetings/ as it becomes 
available.
    Council address: South Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 4055 
Faber Place Drive, Suite 201, N. Charleston, SC 29405.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kim Iverson, Public Information 
Officer, SAFMC; phone: (843) 302-8439 or toll free: (866) SAFMC-10; 
fax: (843) 769-4520; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#254e4c480b4c534057564a4b6556444348460b4b4051"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e8838185c6819e8d9a9b8786a89b898e858bc6868d9c">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Council will host a presentation from 
National Marine Fisheries Service on Tuna Management Strategy 
Evaluation (MSE). The Council is considering using MSEs in future 
management and this will provide a background on how MSEs have been 
used in other fisheries. A question and answer session will follow the 
presentation. Members of the public will have the opportunity to 
participate in the discussion. The presentation is for informational 
purposes only and no management actions will be taken.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for auxiliary aids should be directed to the Council office 
(see ADDRESSES) 3 days prior to the meeting.
    Note: The times and sequence specified in this agenda are subject 
to change.
    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: September 17, 2021.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-20529 Filed 9-21-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                               1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-23-1998
<CASH>                                         163,773
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  123,745
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,795,974
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,405,047
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,888,978
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,332,820
<BONDS>                                      4,815,013
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,526
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,077,466
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,888,978
<SALES>                                      4,040,448
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,040,448
<CGS>                                        2,849,017
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,010,978
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               208,965
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              99,811
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (128,323)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (32,770)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (95,553)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (216,441)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (311,994)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.15)
        

</TABLE>
#### UPHAM, Respondent, v. JEFFERSON COUNTY SAV. BANK, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 16, 1896.)

Action by Addisoñ L. Up-ham, administrator, etc., of Cynthia Phelps, deceased, against the Jefferson County Savings Bank.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Decision made by the concurrence of all.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Nicholas R. Schacht, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report of Learning Tree International, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter March 28, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of the operations of Learning Tree International, Inc.



|            |  |  |  |     |  |                        
|----------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|May 6, 2008 |  |  |  |     |  |                        
|            |  |  | 
|            |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Nicholas R. Schacht
|            |  |  |  |     |  | Nicholas R. Schacht    
|            |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Polly W. Candeloro, Respondent, v Robert S. Candeloro, Appellant.

In a matrimonial action, in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated February 7, 1986, the defendant husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Morrison, J.), entered July 14, 1986, which denied, without a hearing, his motion to vacate the judgment of divorce.

Ordered, that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Although this court has embraced a liberal policy with respect to vacating default judgments in matrimonial actions *(see, Hegarty v Hegarty,*48 AD2d 891; *Antonovich v Antonovich,*84 AD2d 799), the opening of a default is discretionary with the hearing court and under the facts of this case, the court did not abuse its discretion.

The record amply indicates that the defendant never submitted an answer and deliberately failed, to communicate or cooperate with his attorney or the court in the defense of this matter. It is further evident from the record that over one year elapsed wherein repeated attempts were made by the defendant’s attorney to communicate with his client but to no *732avail. We find that the defendant was adequately apprised of the imminence of the proceedings when his attorney forwarded copies of the pleadings to him via certified mail. Despite his attorney’s admonitions that the case was about to be placed on the Uncontested Matrimonial Calendar and a warning issued that he would seek to be relieved from his representation of the defendant in the action unless the defendant contacted him within five days, the defendant did nothing with regard to the matter. As the defendant has failed to offer a valid excuse for his failure to defend this action, we find that Special Term’s refusal to vacate the default judgment was not an improvident exercise of discretion *(see, Glantz v Glantz,*95 AD2d 796; *Gaglio v Gaglio,*63 AD2d 667; *Rapp v Rapp,*59 AD2d 737).

Since the defendant’s counsel neither executed a stipulation to change attorneys nor made a motion to the court to be relieved, his representation of the defendant continued. Therefore, notice of the date of the inquest to the attorney was adequate and sufficient notice as to the defendant *(see,*CPLR 321; *Moustakas v Bouloukos,*112 AD2d 981). The defendant’s bald assertion of *pro se*status is without legal sufficiency and did not serve to relieve the defendant from his duty to appear at the inquest.

As the papers submitted by the parties sufficiently detailed the contentions of the parties, it was not error for Special Term to have rendered its decision without an evidentiary hearing. Niehoff, J. P., Mangano, Bracken and Eiber, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Neal Schwarzfeld, Respondent, v Antonia D’Apice et al., Respondents, and Thomas La Barbera, Appellant. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Thomas J. La Barbera, Appellant, v Antonia D’Apice et al., Respondents, and Neal Schwarzfeld, Respondent-Respondent. (Pro*204ceeding No. 2.)

In a proceeding to validate a petition designating Neal Schwarzfeld as a candidate in the Democratic Party primary election to be held on September 15, 1987, for the public office of Member of the Westchester County Board of Legislators from the 11th Legislative District, and a consolidated cross proceeding to invalidate the designating petition, the appeal, as limited by La Barbera’s brief, is from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.), dated August 7, 1987, as directed the Board of Elections of Westchester County to provide enrolled Democratic voters with an opportunity to ballot.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

In this matter the Supreme Court sustained the finding of the Board of Elections that a petition purporting to designate Neal Schwarzfeld as Democratic candidate for the public office of Member of the County Legislature from the 11th Legislative District, contained an insufficient number of valid signatures. The court, however, then granted the candidate’s request to give enrolled voters of the Democratic Party an opportunity to ballot *(see,*Election Law § 16-100). Under the circumstances of this case we conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in so doing *(see, Matter of Brown v Ulster County Bd. of Elections,*48 NY2d 614, 616). Brown, J. P., Weinstein, Eiber and Kooper, JJ., concur.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 MARVIN BROWN, 2 Plaintiff-Appellant, 3
v. No.29,190 4 STANLEY MOYA, JAMES LOPEZ 5 DWAYNE SANTISTEVAN, CARLOS 6 VALDEZ, DAVID VIGIL, RAY TRUJILLO, 7 T.H. HAMMONTRE, CELESTE V. CASIAS, 8 MIKE FLORES, KEM HEULSKAMP, and 9 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, 10 Defendants-Appellees. 11 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY 12 Daniel A. Sanchez, District Judge 13 Marvin Brown 14 Santa Fe, NM 15 Pro Se Appellant 16 Jim Brewster, General Counsel 17 Diana J. Harris, Deputy General Counsel 18 Santa Fe, NM 19 for Appellees 20
MEMORANDUM OPINION 21 KENNEDY, Judge. 22 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 232 proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, 1 and the time for doing so has expired. 2 AFFIRMED. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4

___________________________________ 5 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge 6
WE CONCUR : 7

___________________________ 8 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge 9

___________________________ 10 ROBERT E. ROBLES, Judge 11
#### Carol Carpenter-Siracusa, Respondent, v Jack Siracusa, Appellant.

Submitted January 22, 2007;

decided March 29, 2007

Motion for leave to appeal denied. Motion for a stay dismissed as academic.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Coast GuardU.S. Department of Homeland Security

Search
Search

Search

-  Home    -  News Room             
  -  Reserve             
  -  Forcecom             
  -  Operations             
  -  Mission Support             
  -  Atlantic Area             
  -  Pacific Area             
  -  History 
-  Units    -  Organization             
  -  Coast Guard A to Z             
  -  Atlantic Area             
  -  Pacific Area             
  -  Force Readiness Command 
-  Leadership    -  Commandant’s Initiatives             
  -  Senior Leadership             
  -  Deputy Commandant for Operations             
  -  Deputy Commandant for Mission Support             
  -  Atlantic Area Commander             
  -  Pacific Area Commander             
  -  Reserve             
  -  Auxiliary 
-  Resources    -  CG Support             
  -  Legal      -  JoinCGJAG             
    -  Legal_Assistance        -  Find-A-Legal-Assistance-Lawyer             
      -  FAQ 
  -  Civil Rights             
  -  Work-Life             
  -  Administrative Law Judges      -  Virtual Hearing 
  -  Newsroom             
  -  Family             
  -  Library             
  -  CG Web Mail             
  -  Return 2 Service      -  FAQ 
-  Community    -  Art Program             
  -  Girl Scouts / Boy Scouts      -  Eagle Scout Recognition 
  -  Coast Guard Band             
  -  Coast Guard Cities             
  -  Honor Guard             
  -  JROTC      -  NEWS 
  -  Special Programs      -  Industry Academy        -  Contacts             
      -  2018 
  -  Trademark             
  -  Resources      -  History             
    -  CGC Eagle 
-  Mariners    -  National Vessel Documentation Center             
  -  National Maritime Center             
  -  National Pollution Funds Center      -  NRD        -  NRD_FAQs             
      -  Trustee_Links             
      -  NRD_DOCS             
      -  About_NRD_Funding 
  -  Boating Safety 
-  doing business		 
-  Join		 
-  Recruiting		 
-  contact		 
-  About		 

HomeHomeUnitsUnit Display

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Northeast (D1) 

#### 

First District Command Center Number: (866) 842-1560 - For maritime emergency use only

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 96-10497

Conference Calendar

__________________

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PACIFIC MEDICAL CLINICS

MANAGEMENT, INC.,

 Defendant,

JAMES NORMAN WELLS,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:96-MC-33-T

- - - - - - - - - -

June 28, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

This court must examine the basis for its jurisdiction on

its own motion if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660

(5th Cir. 1987). James Norman Wells appeals the denial of a

motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum. The magistrate judge

denied this motion, and Wells failed to appeal the ruling to the
No. 96-10497

-2-

district court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). Therefore, we

lack jurisdiction to consider the issue. See Colburn v. Bunge

Towing, Inc., 883 F.2d 372, 379 (5th Cir. 1989).

APPEAL DISMISSED.
Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Alexandria Phillips, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Advanced Engine
Technologies, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

(c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.


Date: November 15, 2004                      /s/ ALEXANDRIA PHILLIPS
                                                 Alexandria Phillips, Treasurer