alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|Investors Capital Holdings, Ltd. report on form 10-Q
|----------------------------------------------------



|Quarter Ended 09/30/07
|----------------------



|Exhibit 32.1CERTIFICATION
|-------------------------

I, Theodore E. Charles, certify that this report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Investors Capital Holdings, Ltd.

Date: November 14, 2007

By: /s/ Theodore E. Charles



|Theodore E. Charles, Chairman,Chief Executive Officer and Director(principal executive officer)
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Page 1

---
#### O’Neal v. The State.

Appeal from Jefferson Criminal Court.

Tried before the 1-Ion. Samuel E. Greene.

No counsel marked as appearing for appellant.

Charles G. Brown, Attorney-General, for the State.

*655Opinion by

Si-iarpe, J.

*654The appellant was indicted and tried for murder in the second degree, and was convicted of manslaughter *655in the second degree, and sentenced to twelve months hard labor for the county.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

 v.

JASON MICHAEL TERPSTRA, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 15-10375

D.C. No. 

3:13-cr-08190-GMS-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 24, 2016** 

Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.

 Jason Michael Terpstra appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 110-month sentence for being a felon in

possession of firearms, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). 

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Terpstra’s counsel has filed

FILED

AUG 26 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw

as counsel of record. We have provided Terpstra the opportunity to file a pro se

supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been

filed. 

Terpstra has waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Because

the record discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the appeal waivers, we

dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir.

2009). 

We decline to review any ineffective assistance of counsel claims on direct

appeal. See United States v. Rahman, 642 F.3d 1257, 1260 (9th Cir. 2011)

(holding that we review ineffective assistance of counsel claims on direct appeal

only in the unusual cases where the record is sufficiently developed or the legal

representation is so obviously inadequate that it denies a defendant his Sixth

Amendment right to counsel). We leave open the possibility that Terpstra might

raise an ineffective assistance of counsel claim in collateral proceedings. See id.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel is GRANTED.

DISMISSED. 

2
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Nicholas R. Schacht, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report of Learning Tree International, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
January 1, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Learning Tree International, Inc.



|                  |  |  |  |  |  |     |  |                           
|----------------- |  |  |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------------
|February 10, 2010 |  |  |  | 
|                  |  |  |  | 
|                  |  |  |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    NICHOLAS R. SCHACHT
|                  |  |  |  |  |  |     |  | Nicholas R. Schacht       
|                  |  |  |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer   

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Learning Tree International, Inc. and will be retained by Learning Tree International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Kiley Blackman, Appellant, v Barbara Stagno et al., Respondents.

Submitted February 26, 2007;

decided April 26, 2007

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that *939the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
##### 



O2Diesel Corporation
(A Development Stage Company) Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATIONS OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, David Koontz as Chief Financial Officer, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of O2Diesel Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:  (a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
prepared;(b)
    {omitted pursuant to the guidance of Release No. 33-8238 (June 5, 2003)}(c)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures presented in this annual report and presented in this annual
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures based on such evaluation; and(d)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal controls
over financial reporting that occurred during O2Diesel Corporations most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect; O2Diesel Corporations internal controls over
financial reporting, and procedures. 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrants Independent Registered Accounting Firm
and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):  (a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting. Date: March 30, 2005 /s/ David KoontzDavid KoontzChief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 23.1** **CONSENT    OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the    Registration Statements on    Form S-3(No. 333-39457)    and    Form S-8    (Nos.    333-23821,333-23823,333-23825,333-23827,333-43447,333-52807,333-52809**,**333-39780    and    333-105711)    of Ingram Micro Inc. of our report dated February 26, 2007    relating to the consolidated financial statements, financial    statement schedule, management’s assessment of the    effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and    the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,    which appears in this    Form 10-K. */s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers    LLP***     Orange County, California    February 26, 2007
### 160

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS



### AUSTIN

**Honorable Gee.**  **H. Sheppard**  Coaptroller

oi Publlo

Aecoumts Awtlu, Texas
Dear Slrr

Wo are in reoeipt

a, fiml.,

or wrp3rati8a plae8 of amweawat, or 8e in 68lm8~tloa

with the l8h a prtw in the foonn 

### or nomy ~81~8 is offered

or i&ma to 

### row et *aah 

### theutr8, plaoe

### 0r uslaw8 enterpriw, and not igiven row there& papipe the same aha* Zr 8ay crertafn

8ervle8,

oom&it thl’ or **wltertaa sant,**  oh8ll

made 8 verified

sea J mpwt on. Zha tmntp2iti~ day of -ah math to ths CW@- trollor of Yubllo

AdQ,IIILts

M! the State of 'POXss, saawing

the WOW% of aowy so girea in pL'IW8* and the valueot all pr&ur Qr s*ardsa0 gives in conaeetiion

with ruoh bustaesa Quriag the next prewdi~ month.

### 3.61

Bormrable

Gee.H. Sheppard,

Page g
*(b) There is herebylerleda tax equal to twenty

per cant (2X@)

of the valua 0r all suchmoney,prlus;and awurds given in acmneetlon with the operation of eaah aad all oi‘the ioregolng

buslnese

enterprises,

and at the time or makbg the report to tha Coeptroller o? Fub1%~ **Aooowts,** the ouner or operatoro? any swh business

shallpay to the State **Treasurer** sush tax **apoa** the total **afaoaat** o? money, prizes, and .awarda so givenduringthe next preoedfng olonth. - 7 IT lî Xeeping

the above ?aots la mind and readingths statutes

oara?ally,

we rind that part or the statutesutfmtiedwhloh requires that the prlssbe givenauay ln sonmationwith a theatre, plaoeer tarpriaa, afawewnt, or businassenThe prlw nsoessarlly being givento a patron, we also ?lnd that put o? the statute has beanmet. Ths only quaatlon

leeit is **whether** or not a partloular cua+mr is ashlbitlng

the sklU neaossary to plaae tha bulletYA a eortdn 8p00irisdpattern 1s puylng **a** oharge **a66itiwul** to that paid by other putrow of the- business

enterprise. In oar opinion

he 1s not. vi0

aa~ SW no benefitl a o r u ln g to the operator

0r the ahooting

gallerytbroagh the uot 0r **a** mrtlcular oustcnaer **in pUcS.ng**  the **bullet6** rithln the apsoirled

pattern. Se oannet see uhera he 1s dalirorlng aore to the operator of the ahootU.ggallerythanls tha **austoiner who**  **doss not**  **shoot se**  **well. Our**  **aumrer to**  **your** qwatlon thereiore

iollows,

that tha tax is dae.
Yoaunvery truly

**CRL:tM** COMM”TEE

ATTORNEY GENERAL Or' TEXAB
---

Exhibit 99.7

Summary of Loan Agreement Entered into by and between
Shenzhen BAKBattery Co., Ltd. (the Company) and
Longgang Branch, ShenzhenDevelopment Bank Co., Ltd
(the Creditor) on August 4, 2010

Main contents:

- Contract number: Shenfa
      Longgang Daizi 20100803001;
- Main Contract:
      Comprehensive Credit Facility Agreement;
- Main Contract number:
      Shenfa Longgang Zongzi 20091221001;
- Loan principal: RMB 20
      million;
- Loan term: from August 4,
      2010 to June 14 , 2011;
- Floating interest rate:
      Interest rate of loan shall be 95% of the benchmark rate announced by the
      Peoples Bank of China, and be adjusted every 3 months;Interest accrued and settled per
      month, interest settlement day is the 20thday of each
      month;
    Penalty interest rate for delayed
      repayment: current interest rate plus 50% * current interest rate;
    Penalty interest rate for
      embezzlement of loan proceeds: current interest rate *1;
- Interest accrued and settled per
      month, interest settlement day is the 20thday of each
      month;
- Penalty interest rate for delayed
      repayment: current interest rate plus 50% * current interest rate;
- Penalty interest rate for
      embezzlement of loan proceeds: current interest rate *1;
- Purpose of the loan is to
      provide working capital for the Company;
- If any of the following
      occurs, the Creditor is entitled to demand prepayment of loan principal
      and interest before maturity and cancel all loans unprovided ;The Company provides untrue
      documents or hide important financial information about its
      operation;
    The Company intentionally evades
      bank debts by way of related  party transaction or other
    means;
    The Company uses loan proceeds for
      purposes other than what is agreed without the consent of the Creditor;
    Occurrence of other instances which
      endangers or may endanger the safety of the loan provided by the Creditor;
- The Company provides untrue
      documents or hide important financial information about its
      operation;
- The Company intentionally evades
      bank debts by way of related  party transaction or other
    means;
- The Company uses loan proceeds for
      purposes other than what is agreed without the consent of the Creditor;
- Occurrence of other instances which
      endangers or may endanger the safety of the loan provided by the Creditor;

Headlines of the articles
      omitted:

- Interest clearing of the
      loan
- Payment of the loan
- Rights and obligation of
      the Company
- Rights and obligations of
      the Creditor
- Disputation settlement and
      Validity
- Fees
- Breach of contract
      penalties
- Declaration, guaranty and
      undertaking of the Company
- Amendment and Termination
      of Contract
- Others

---
CERTIFICATION

I, Theodore E. Charles, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Investors Capital
     Holdings, Ltd.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
     quarterly report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
     committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
     equivalent function):

     a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
     quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
     controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
     controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including
     any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
     weaknesses.

Date: February 17, 2004

By: /s/ THEODORE E. CHARLES
--------------------------
Theodore E. Charles
Chief Executive Officer



                                       22
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 129289 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 129289 COA: 258676 Wayne CC: 93-012011 DWAYNE EDWARD JONES, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the June 24, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT the Wayne County Prosecuting Attorney to answer the defendant’s application for leave to appeal, including the issue of whether defendant is entitled to an evidentiary h earing on the question whether he is entitled to a new trial on the basi s of newly discovered evidence.

The application for leave to appeal remains pending.

K ELLY , J., would remand this case to the Wa yne Circuit Court fo r an evidentiary hearing.

d0120 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 27, 2006

Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2309 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2309

To amend the Equal Credit Opportunity Act to prohibit discrimination on 
account of sexual orientation or gender identity when extending credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 13, 2015

  Mr. Israel (for himself, Ms. Judy Chu of California, Ms. Hahn, Mr. 
 Blumenauer, Mr. Swalwell of California, Ms. Schakowsky, Ms. Tsongas, 
   Mr. Ellison, Ms. Wasserman Schultz, Mr. Peters, Mr. Sean Patrick 
 Maloney of New York, Mr. Grijalva, Ms. Clarke of New York, Mrs. Davis 
 of California, Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney of New York, Mr. Delaney, Mr. 
   Polis, Mr. Fattah, Mr. Cicilline, Mr. Sherman, Mr. Connolly, Ms. 
Speier, Ms. Norton, Mr. Cardenas, Mr. Rangel, Ms. DelBene, Mrs. Watson 
 Coleman, Mr. Ted Lieu of California, Ms. Lee, Mr. Farr, Mr. Langevin, 
   Ms. Pingree, Ms. Wilson of Florida, Mr. Himes, Mr. McDermott, Ms. 
   Adams, Mr. Pocan, Mr. Nadler, Mr. Lowenthal, Mr. Crowley, and Ms. 
Roybal-Allard) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Equal Credit Opportunity Act to prohibit discrimination on 
account of sexual orientation or gender identity when extending credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Freedom from Discrimination in 
Credit Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST DISCRIMINATION ON ACCOUNT OF SEXUAL 
              ORIENTATION OR GENDER IDENTITY.

    Subsection (a)(1) of section 701 of the Equal Credit Opportunity 
Act (15 U.S.C. 1691) is amended, by striking ``on the basis of race, 
color, religion, national origin, sex or marital status,'' and 
inserting ``on the basis of actual or perceived race, color, religion, 
national origin, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or marital 
status,''.

SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

    Section 702 of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (15 U.S.C. 1691a) 
is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsections (f) and (g) as subsections 
        (g) and (i), respectively;
            (2) by inserting after subsection (e) the following new 
        subsections:
    ``(f) The term `gender identity' means the gender-related identity, 
appearance, or mannerisms or other gender-related characteristics of an 
individual, with or without regard to the individual's designated sex 
at birth.''; and
            (3) by inserting after subsection (g), as so redesignated, 
        the following:
    ``(h) The term `sexual orientation' means homosexuality, 
heterosexuality, or bisexuality.''.
                                 <all>
```
Dismiss and Opinion Filed March 8 , 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05
- 21
- 01007
- CV IN THE INTEREST OF G.S.C., G.N.C., I.J.C., Z.N.C., A.A.C., AND G.L.C., CHILDREN On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF
- 19
- 13105 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Osborne, and Nowell Opinion by Justice Nowell By notice of appeal filed November 18, 2021, appellant challenges the trial court’s order s signed “on or about October 24, 2021 and . . . November 11, 2021.” Because the October order is not appealable and the November order does not exist, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3(a). As reflected in the record, appellee filed a motion for enforcement of the parties’ final decree of divorce in April 2021 . A hearing on the motion was held October 24, and an order holding appellant in contempt and committing him to county jail was signed the next day. On November 2, appellant filed a motion for– 2

–

release from jail. The record reflects th e trial court heard that motion on November 11, but no order was signed. Because contempt orders are not reviewable on direct appeal and no order on appel lant’s motion to release him from jail has been signed, we questioned our jurisdiction over the appeal. See Farmer v. Ben E. Keith Co. , 907 S.W.2d 495, 496 (Tex. 1995) (per curiam) (appellate deadline runs from signing of written order); Herzfeld v. Herzf

eld , 285 S.W.3d 122, 132 (Tex. App.

— Dallas 2009, no pet.) (contempt orders involving confinement are reviewable by writ of habeas corpus; contempt orders not involving confinement are reviewable by mandamus). Although we directed appellant to file a lette r brief addressing our concern and cautioned him that failure to comply within ten days could result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice, more than ten days have passed and appellant has not complied. Accordingly, with no appealable order be fore us, we dismiss the appeal.
See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3(a).

211007 f.p05 /Erin A. Nowell/ / ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE– 3

– 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT
IN THE INTEREST OF G.S.C., G.N.C., I.J.C., Z.N.C., A.A.C., AND G.L.C., CHILDREN No. 05

- 21

- 01007

- CV On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF

- 19

- 13105. Opinion delivered by Justice Nowell, Justices Myers and Osborne participating. In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.
We ORDER that appellee Josie Carrasco recover her costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant Santos Carrasco.
Judgment entered this day of March 8, 2022.