CLAIM SUMMARY / DETERMINATION FORM 

Date : 2/10/2009 

Claim Number : 909064-001

Claimant : State of Connecticut 

Type of Claimant : State 

Type of Claim : Removal Costs 

Claim Manager : 

Amount Requested : $7,942.34 

FACTS: 

1. Oil Spill Incident: On June 22, 2004, the Enfield Fire Department reported 6 inches 

of oil that made its way into two catch basins near O’Hear Avenue. The claimant, 

Connecticut DEP (CT DEP), reported the incident to the National Response Center 

(NRC) via report # 725852. CT DEP was the first on scene and no source of the 

discharge was apparent. The claimant hired Kropp Environmental to handle response 

actions. The Enfield Fire Department checked the area daily and as of July 28, 2004, no 

oil reappeared in the area. The catch basin that the oil entered flows to Fresh Water 

Brook which flows directly into the Connecticut River, a navigable waterway of the US. 

CT DEP notified the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Region 1 

on the day of the incident and provided a follow up on September 13, 2004 to Ms. 

, the Federal On Scene Coordinator (FOSC) who authorized CTDEP to take 

the response actions that were performed. 

2. Description of removal actions: CTDEP investigated the site and checked the 

residential basements of the surrounding homes in the area for any spilled fuel or leaks. 

No evidence of leaking was found. The cleanup contractor deployed booms and 

absorbents in the appropriate catch basins in order to collect the released fuel. The 

cleanup contractor also pumped all free product from the catch basins as well. The FOSC 

reported the cleanup was consistent with the National Contingency Plan (NCP) on 

September 14, 2004 when the case was called by the FOSC. 

3. The Claim: On February 2, 2009, Connecticut DEP submitted a removal cost claim 

to the National Pollution Funds Center (NPFC), for reimbursement of their 

uncompensated removal costs in the amount of $7,942.34 for the services provided on 

June 22, 2004 for a mystery spill of oil discovered the catch basins of O’Hear Avenue in 

Enfield, CT. This claim is for removal costs based on the contracted rate schedule in 

place with Connecticut DEP at the time services were provided. 

This claim consists of copies of the invoicing and associated dailies, disposal manifests, 

contracted rate schedules, Connecticut DEP Spill Summary Report, NRC report, sample 

analysis and associated results and EPA FOSC coordination. The review of the actual 

cost invoicing and dailies focused on: (1) whether the actions taken were compensable 

“removal actions” under OPA and the claims regulations at 33 CFR 136 (e.g., actions to 

prevent, minimize, mitigate the effects of the incident); (2) whether the costs were 

incurred as a result of these actions; (3) whether the actions taken were consistent with 

the NCP or directed by the FOSC, and (4) whether the costs were adequately 

documented. 

 
APPLICABLE LAW: 

Under OPA 90, at 33 USC § 2702(a), responsible parties are liable for removal costs and 

damages resulting from the discharge of oil into navigable waters and adjoining 

shorelines, as described in Section 2702(b) of OPA 90. A responsible party’s liability 

will include “removal costs incurred by any person for acts taken by the person which are 

consistent with the National Contingency Plan”. 33 USC § 2702(b)(1)(B).

"Oil" is defined in relevant part, at 33 USC § 2701(23), to mean “oil of any kind or in any 

form, including petroleum, fuel oil, sludge, oil refuse, and oil mixed with wastes other 

than dredged spoil”.

The Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund (OSLTF), which is administered by the NPFC, is 

available, pursuant to 33 USC §§ 2712(a)(4) and 2713 and the OSLTF claims 

adjudication regulations at 33 CFR Part 136, to pay claims for uncompensated removal 

costs that are determined to be consistent with the National Contingency Plan and 

uncompensated damages. Removal costs are defined as “the costs of removal that are 

incurred after a discharge of oil has occurred or, in any case in which there is a 

substantial threat of a discharge of oil, the costs to prevent, minimize, or mitigate oil 

pollution from an incident”.

Under 33 USC §2713(b)(2) and 33 CFR 136.103(d) no claim against the OSLTF may be 

approved or certified for payment during the pendency of an action by the claimant in 

court to recover the same costs that are the subject of the claim. See also, 33 USC 

§2713(c) and 33 CFR 136.103(c)(2) [claimant election]. 

33 U.S.C. §2713(d) provides that “If a claim is presented in accordance with this section, 

including a claim for interim, short-term damages representing less than the full amount 

of damages to which the claimant ultimately may be entitled, and full and adequate 

compensation is unavailable, a claim for the uncompensated damages and removal costs 

may be presented to the Fund.” 

Under 33 CFR 136.105(a) and 136.105(e)(6), the claimant bears the burden of providing 

to the NPFC, all evidence, information, and documentation deemed necessary by the 

Director, NPFC, to support the claim. 

Under 33 CFR 136.105(b) each claim must be in writing, for a sum certain for each 

category of uncompensated damages or removal costs resulting from an incident. In 

addition, under 33 CFR 136, the claimant bears the burden to prove the removal actions 

were reasonable in response to the scope of the oil spill incident, and the NPFC has the 

authority and responsibility to perform a reasonableness determination. Specifically, 

under 33 CFR 136.203, “a claimant must establish -

(a) That the actions taken were necessary to prevent, minimize, or mitigate the effects of 

the incident;

(b) That the removal costs were incurred as a result of these actions;
(c) That the actions taken were determined by the FOSC to be consistent with the 

National Contingency Plan or were directed by the FOSC.”

Under 33 CFR 136.205 “the amount of compensation allowable is the total of 

uncompensated reasonable removal costs of actions taken that were determined by the 

FOSC to be consistent with the National Contingency Plan or were directed by the 

FOSC. Except in exceptional circumstances, removal activities for which costs are being 

claimed must have been coordinated with the FOSC.” [Emphasis added]. 

DETERMINATION OF LOSS: 

A. Overview:

1. The FOSC has provided FOSC coordination via a facsimile dated September 13, 

2004. 

2. The incident involved the substantial threat of discharge of “oil” as defined in 

OPA 90, 33 U.S.C. § 2701(23), to navigable waters.

3. In accordance with 33 CFR § 136.105(e)(12), the claimant has certified no suit 

has been filed in court for the claimed uncompensated removal costs.

4. The claim was submitted on time.

5. The NPFC Claims Manager has thoroughly reviewed all documentation submitted 

with the claim and determined that the removal costs presented were for actions in

accordance with the NCP and that the costs for these actions were indeed 

reasonable and allowable under OPA and 33 CFR § 136.205. 

B. Analysis:

NPFC CA reviewed the actual cost invoices and dailies to confirm that the claimant had 

incurred all costs claimed. The review focused on: (1) whether the actions taken were 

compensable “removal actions” under OPA and the claims regulations at 33 CFR 136 

(e.g., actions to prevent, minimize, mitigate the effects of the incident); (2) whether the 

costs were incurred as a result of these actions; (3) whether the actions taken were 

determined by the FOSC, to be consistent with the NCP or directed by the FOSC, and (4) 

whether the costs were adequately documented and reasonable. 

On that basis, the Claims Manager hereby determines that the claimant did in fact incur 

$7,942.34 of uncompensated removal costs and that that amount is properly payable by 

the OSLTF as full compensation for the reimbursable removal costs incurred by the 

claimant and submitted to the NPFC under claim# 909064-001. The claimant represents 

that all costs paid by the claimant are compensable removal costs, payable by the OSLTF 

as presented by the claimant.

C. Determined Amount: 

The NPFC hereby determines that the OSLTF will pay $7,942.34 as full compensation 

for the reimbursable removal costs incurred by the Claimant and submitted to the NPFC 

under claim # 909064-001. All costs claimed are for charges paid for by the Claimant for 

removal actions as that term is defined in OPA and, are compensable removal costs, 

payable by the OSLTF as presented by the Claimant.
AMOUNT: $7,942.34

Claim Supervisor: 

Date of Supervisor’s review: 

Supervisor Action: 

Supervisor’s Comments: