alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1


                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Theodore E. Charles, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Investors Capital Holdings,
     Ltd.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

     a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
         disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
         us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this annual report is being prepared; and

     b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
         procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
         of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation.


Date: November 14, 2005

/s/ Theodore E. Charles

Theodore E. Charles, Chairman, President,
Chief Executive Officer and Director
(principal executive officer)
# C_2021501EN.01000801.xml

| 13.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 501/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 501/8

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10487 – CDPQ / INVESTCORP / ICR)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 501/02)

On 27 October 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10487. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10487. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

The Board of Directors
Petsec Energy Ltd


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (No. 333-6128) of Petsec Energy Ltd of our report dated May 20, 2004,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Petsec Energy Ltd and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2003 and the related consolidated
statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss) and cash flows for each of
the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2003 which report appears
in the December 31, 2003 annual report on Form 20-F of Petsec Energy Ltd.




KPMG
Sydney, Australia
May 24, 2004
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice #3277]

The Shipping Coordinating Committee will conduct an open meeting at 9:30 a.m. on Thursday, May 11, 2000, in Room 2415, at U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters, 2100 2nd Street, SW, Washington, DC. The purpose of this meeting will be to finalize preparations for the 72nd Session of the Maritime Safety Committee, and associated bodies of the International Maritime Organization (IMO), which is scheduled for May 17-26, 2000, at IMO Headquarters in London. At this meeting, papers received and the draft U.S. positions will be discussed. 

Among other things, the items of particular interest are: 

a. Bulk carrier safety; 

b. Role of the human element; 

c. Formal safety assessment; 

d. Piracy and armed robbery against ships; 

e. Reports of seven subcommittees—Training and watchkeeping; Flag State implementation; Bulk liquids and gases; Radiocommunications and search and rescue; Safety of navigation; Dangerous goods, solid cargoes and containers; Fire protection; and, Ship design and equipment; 

Members of the public may attend this meeting up to the seating capacity of the room. Interested persons may seek information by writing to Mr. Joseph J. Angelo, Commandant (G-MS), U.S. Coast Guard, 2100 2nd Street, SW, Room 1218, Washington, DC 20593-0001 or by calling (202) 267-2970. 

Dated: April 6, 2000

Stephen M. Miller, 

Executive Secretary, Shipping Coordinating Committee, U.S. Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 00-9729 Filed 4-18-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-17-U
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Secure Computing Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Timothy J. Steinkopf, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Timothy J. Steinkopf                                       
|Timothy J. Steinkopf                                           
|Senior Vice President of Operations and Chief Financial Officer
|August 3, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2624 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2624

   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to allow for fair 
application of the exceptions process for drugs in tiers in formularies 
    in prescription drug plans under Medicare part D, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 3, 2015

 Mr. Johnson of Georgia (for himself and Mr. McKinley) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
  Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a 
 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to allow for fair 
application of the exceptions process for drugs in tiers in formularies 
    in prescription drug plans under Medicare part D, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Part D Beneficiary Appeals Fairness 
Act''.

SEC. 2. FAIR EXCEPTIONS PROCESS FOR DRUG IN TIERS UNDER MEDICARE PART 
              D.

    Section 1860D-4(g)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w-
103(g)(2)) is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence--
                    (A) by striking ``for tiered cost-sharing for drugs 
                included within a formulary and'' and inserting ``for 
                any tiered cost-sharing structure within a formulary 
                (including a structure that''; and
                    (B) by inserting ``, or provides for different co-
                payment or coinsurance amounts for drugs in different 
                tiers included within the formulary)'' before ``, a 
                part D eligible individual'';
            (2) in the second sentence, by inserting ``in any plan 
        formulary'' before ``could be covered''; and
            (3) by inserting the following before the last sentence: 
        ``In no case may the Secretary allow a PDP sponsor to make any 
        formulary tier of the tiered cost-sharing structure (including 
        a formulary tier used for very high cost or unique items) 
        ineligible for lower-cost sharing through an exception under 
        this paragraph.''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pyramid Breweries Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jason
W. Rees, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ JASON W. REES

Jason W. Rees
Chief Accounting Officer
August 15, 2005
#### Robert Johnson, Respondent, v Mark Wagner, Appellant.

*1055The particulars requested in paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 of the demand are not relevant to plaintiffs claim in this action for moneys received by defendant as plaintiff’s agent. The particulars requested in paragraphs 5, 6 and 7, however, are pertinent to the claim and should be furnished. Defendant’s motion, therefore, is granted to the extent that plaintiff is precluded from offering evidence at the trial concerning the matters requested in paragraphs 5, 6 and 7 of the demand unless he complies with those requests within 30 days after the service of the order entered hereon. Should plaintiff for good cause be unable to furnish the particulars within 30 days after service of the order, he may move at Special Term for an extension of time. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Seneca County, Dugan, J. — preclusion.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Secure Computing Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Timothy P. McGurran, Chief Operating Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2003, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|/s/    Timothy P. McGurran           
|-------------------------------------
|Timothy P. McGurran                  
|President and Chief Operating Officer
|October 31, 2003
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                     906 OF THE SARBAENES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Mass Megawatts Wind Power, Inc.
(the 'Company') on Form 10-KSB for the year ended April 30, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the 'Report'), each
of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbaenes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to such officer's knowledge: Section 13(a)

     (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of
     Section 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934: and

     (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

     In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by
the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on
the dates indicated.

                                    MASS MEGAWATTS WIND POWER, INC.


Date: July 12, 2006                 By: /s/ Jonathan Ricker
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Jonathan Ricker
                                        Title: Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
                                        Chief Financial Officer and Principal
                                        Accounting Officer
Order entered October 27, 2017

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 17
- 00750
- CR HENRY LEE FLETCHER, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 416
- 82292
- 2015



### O RDER
We REINSTATE this appeal. On October 17, 2017, w e abated this appeal for a hearing in the trial court to determine whether appellant ha d been deprived of the clerk’s record and reporter’s record because of ineffective counsel, indigence, or for any other reason. The clerk’s record was filed October 23, 2017. On October 24, 2017, the trial court’s findings were filed. We ADOPT the findings that (1) appellant is indi gent and wants to pursue the appeal; (2) the court reporters who recorded the proceedings are Kristen Kopp and Sheri Vecera; and (3) Ms. Kopp and Ms. Vecera estimate the records will be completed on or before December 1, 2017.
We ORDER the reporter’s recor d due on or before December 1, 2017.We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Andrea Thompson,

Presiding Judge, 416th Judicial District Court; to Sheri Vecera, official court reporter, 199 th Judicial District Court; Kristen Kopp, o fficial court reporter, County Court at Law No. 2; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
# C_2021447EN.01001301.xml

| 4.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 447/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 447/13

---

Special report No 24/2021

Performance-based financing in Cohesion policy: worthy ambitions, but obstacles remained in the 2014-2020 period

(2021/C 447/05)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that special report No 24/2021 ‘Performance-based financing in Cohesion policy: worthy ambitions, but obstacles remained in the 2014-2020 period’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu

---
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATIONS



Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, in his capacity as an officer of SPACEHAB, Incorporated (SPACEHAB), that, to the
best of his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of SPACEHAB on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in
the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of SPACEHAB.



Date: February 11, 2005



/s/ Michael E. KearneyMichael E. KearneyPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Brian K. HarringtonBrian K. HarringtonSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SPACEHAB and will be retained by SPACEHAB and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7030
LINUS ROMEY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus J. VANYUR, Warden, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-657-5-BR) Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 6, 1999 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Linus Romey, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Linus Romey appeals the district court’s order denying reliefon his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Romey v. Vanyur , No. CA-97-657-5-BR (E.D.N.C. May 26, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2021024EN.01000901.xml

| 22.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/9

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9892 — Leonardo/Thales/VSB)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 24/05)

On 2 December 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9892. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9892. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

EDUARDO ROBERTO BITIA LOPEZ,

AKA Eduardo Roberto Bitia, AKA

Manuel Corado Lopez,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 12-50028

D.C. No. 2:11-cr-00333-ABC-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Audrey B. Collins, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 13, 2012 ** 

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Eduardo Lopez appeals the 73-month sentence imposed following his guilty

plea to being a deported alien found in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. §

FILED

NOV 19 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-50028

1326. We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a) and 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and

we affirm.

Because Lopez failed to object to the district court’s alleged procedural

errors at sentencing, we review for plain error. United States v. Sylvester Norman

Knows His Gun, III, 438 F.3d 913, 918 (9th Cir. 2005). Contrary to Lopez’s

assertion, the district court did not treat the Sentencing Guidelines as establishing a

presumptive sentence, but rather, properly treated the Sentencing Guidelines as

advisory, and properly considered the § 3553(a) sentencing factors. See Gall v.

United States, 552 U.S. 38, 50 n.6 (2007).

We review the substantive reasonableness of a sentence for abuse of

discretion. United States v. Autery, 555 F.3d 864, 871 (9th Cir. 2008). When a

district court properly applies the Sentencing Guidelines, “‘it is probable that the

sentence is reasonable.’” United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 994 (9th Cir. 2008)

(en banc) (quoting Rita v. United States, 551 U.S. 338, 551 (2007)). Here, the

district court properly applied the Guidelines and imposed a sentence at the lower

end of the applicable Guidelines range based on a reasonable application of the §

3553(a) factors. The district court also acted within its discretion in denying Lopez

a downward departure based on his health problems. See e.g. United States v.
3 12-50028

Tadeo, 222 F.3d 623, 627 (9th Cir. 2000). We conclude that the sentence imposed

by the district court was substantively reasonable.

AFFIRMED.