alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2460 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the provision of adult 

day health care services for veterans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 19, 2015 

Mr. ZELDIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the 

provision of adult day health care services for veterans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROVISION OF ADULT DAY HEALTH CARE 

4 SERVICES FOR VETERANS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1745 of title 38, United 

6 States Code, is amended— 

7 (1) by adding at the end the following new sub8 section: 

9 ‘‘(d)(1) The Secretary shall enter into an agreement 

10 under section 1720(c)(1) of this title or a contract with 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2460 IH

1 each State home for payment by the Secretary for adult 

2 day health care provided to a veteran who is eligible for, 

3 but does not receive, nursing home care pursuant to sub4 section (a). 

5 ‘‘(2) Payment under each agreement or contract be6 tween the Secretary and a State home under paragraph 

7 (1) for each veteran who receives care under such para8 graph shall be made at a rate that is equal to 65 percent 

9 of the payment that the Secretary would pay to the State 

10 home pursuant to subsection (a)(2) if the veteran received 

11 nursing home care under subsection (a) rather than under 

12 paragraph (1) of this subsection. 

13 ‘‘(3) Payment by the Secretary under paragraph (1) 

14 to a State home for adult day health care provided to a 

15 veteran described in that paragraph constitutes payment 

16 in full to the State home for such care furnished to that 

17 veteran.’’; and 

18 (2) in the heading, by inserting ‘‘, adult day 

19 health care,’’ after ‘‘home care’’. 

20 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

21 at the beginning of chapter 17 of such title is amended 

22 by striking the item relating to section 1745 and inserting 

23 the following new item: 

‘‘1745. Nursing home care, adult day health care, and medications for veterans 

with service-connected disabilities.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 254 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the deduction 

for start-up expenditures for business for 2015 and 2016. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2015 

Mr. HONDA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the deduction for start-up expenditures for business for 

2015 and 2016. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Support Our Startups 

5 Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN DEDUCTION FOR START-UP EXPENDI7 TURES FOR 2015 AND 2016. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (3) of section 195(b) 

9 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 254 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘2010’’ in the matter preceding 

2 subparagraph (A) and inserting ‘‘2010, 2015, or 

3 2016’’, and 

4 (2) by striking ‘‘2010’’ in the heading and in5 serting ‘‘2010, 2015, OR 2016’’. 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

7 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

8 December 31, 2014. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

PERIODIC REPORT CERTIFICATION  of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

I, Dennis C. Pence, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Coldwater Creek Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)   the
report of the Company on Form 10-K for the annual period ended January 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/
DENNIS C. PENCE

Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
April 12, 2004

I,
Melvin Dick, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Coldwater Creek Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)   the
report of the Company on Form 10-K for the annual period ended January 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/
MELVIN DICK

Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
April 12, 2004

---

QuickLinks
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

April 28, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 135840 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 135840 

 COA: 275479 

Oakland CC: 2006-210958-FC 

GREGORY HAMILTON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 10, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0421 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 28, 2008 

 Clerk
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ILEX Oncology, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeffrey H.Buchalter, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.             The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

2.             The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
|   |          /s/  Jeffrey H. Buchalter |                                   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|   | Name:                                                                           | Jeffrey H.  Buchalter                  |
|   | Title:                                                                          | President and  Chief Executive Officer |
|   | Date:                                                                           | August 14, 2003                        |
|        |                                                                                 |                                        |  |

 

----
# C_2021505DE.01001601.xml

| 15.12.2021 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | C 505/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2021

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

C 505/16

---

Berichtigung der Liste der Goldmünzen, die die Kriterien von Artikel 344 Absatz 1 Nummer 2 der Richtlinie 2006/112/EG des Rates vom 28. November 2006 (Sonderregelung für Anlagegold) erfüllen — Gültig für das Jahr 2022

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 446 vom 3. November 2021
  )

(2021/C 505/07)

Seite 18, Tabelle:

Anstatt:

| „DÄNEMARK | 10 KRONER
  20 KRONER
  1 000 KRONER |
| --- | --- |
| DOMINIKANISCHE REPUBLIK | 30 PESOS
  100 PESOS
  200 PESOS
  250 PESOS“ |

„DÄNEMARK

10 KRONER

20 KRONER

1 000 KRONER

DOMINIKANISCHE REPUBLIK

30 PESOS

100 PESOS

200 PESOS

250 PESOS“

muss es heißen:

| „DÄNEMARK | 10 KRONER
  20 KRONER
  1 000 KRONER |
| --- | --- |
| DEUTSCHLAND | 1 DM
  50 EURO
  100 EURO |
| DOMINIKANISCHE REPUBLIK | 30 PESOS
  100 PESOS
  200 PESOS
  250 PESOS“ |

„DÄNEMARK

10 KRONER

20 KRONER

1 000 KRONER

DEUTSCHLAND

1 DM

50 EURO

100 EURO

DOMINIKANISCHE REPUBLIK

30 PESOS

100 PESOS

200 PESOS

250 PESOS“

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) BALANCE
SHEETS STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,729,173
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,188,482
<ALLOWANCES>                                    99,875
<INVENTORY>                                  3,756,308
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,101,093
<PP&E>                                       1,454,611
<DEPRECIATION>                                 270,089
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,342,088
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,520,721
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       141,851
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,679,516
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,342,088
<SALES>                                      2,467,175
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,467,175
<CGS>                                        1,189,257
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,189,257
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,107,592
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,982
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (839,758)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (839,758)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (839,758)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)
        

</TABLE>
December 10, 1998


         LETTER AGREEMENT BETWEEN SPACEHAB, Inc., AND ALENIA AEROSPAZIO


This letter is to confirm our agreement regarding the outstanding debt SPACEHAB,
Inc. ("Spacehab") owes to Alenia Aerospazio("Alenia")

Notwithstanding   anything  to  the  contrary   contained  in  the  Subordinated
Promissory  Notes  issued by Spacehab to Alenia and  subsequent  agreements  and
correspondence in respect thereto, it is acknowledged and agreed as follows:

1.       As of today,  10 December  1998,  Spacehab  owes to Alenia an amount of
         $11,895,000.  Of such amount, Spacehab shall pay to Alenia an amount of
         $4,034,928 on or before December 31, 1998.

2.       Subject to compliance by Spacehab with the terms of this letter, Alenia
         agrees that the remaining  amount of $7,860,072 owed to Alenia shall be
         finally due and payable by Spacehab to Alenia on August 1, 2001.

3.       From August 1, 2001,  the debt of Spacehab to Alenia shall be no longer
         subordinated to the Senior  Indebtedness as defined in the Subordinated
         Promissory  Notes.  On or before  August 1,  2001,  Alenia may elect to
         convert,  in whole or in  part,  the  principal  amount  into  Spacehab
         equity, on terms and conditions to be agreed with Spacehab.

4.       Subject to compliance by Spacehab with the terms of this letter, Alenia
         further agrees that: a) the interest accruing beginning January 1, 1999
         on  the  outstanding  amount  owed  by  Spacehab  to  Alenia  shall  be
         calculated  at the  rate  of  10%  per  annum  compounded  and  payable
         quarterly,  until the  principal  amount is paid in full as foreseen in
         point 3 above or converted as provided  therein and, b) Alenia  cancels
         payment  of  the  October  through  December  1998  quarterly  interest
         obligation due under the Subordinated Promissory Notes.

5.       The  undersigned  hereby  represent and warrant that they have obtained
         the necessary authorizations and consents necessary to execute and bind
         the respective parties hereto.

If the foregoing is in accordance with your  understanding of our  arrangements,
please sign and return one copy of this  letter,  whereupon  this  letter  shall
become a binding agreement among us in accordance with its terms.

Sincerely,

                                            SPACEHAB, Inc.

                                            by:      /s/ Shelley A. Harrison
                                                     Name    Shelley A. Harrison
                                                     Title   Chairman and CEO


Accepted and agreed to this _________ day of _____________1998
Alenia Aerospazio Div. Spazio
A company of Finnmeccanica S.p.A.

By:      /s/
         Name
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

SEDONA PACIFIC HOUSING 

PARTNERSHIP D/B/A SEDONA

PACIFIC PROPERTIES AND

GONZALEZ FINANCIAL HOLDINGS,

INC.,

 Appellants,

v.

ALFONSO VENTURA AND

MARIA VENTURA,

 Appellees.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-11-00208-CV

Appeal from

County Court at Law No. 1

of Tarrant County, Texas

(TC # 09-76115-1 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee 

recover from Appellant and its sureties, if any, see TEX.R.APP.P. 43.5, on the judgment and all 

costs, both in this Court and the court below for which let execution issue. This decision shall be 

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 22ND DAY OF MAY, 2013.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice 

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Antcliff, JJ.

Antcliff, J., not participating
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Financial Officer) pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



We, David C. Collins and Nicholas R. Schacht, certify that the periodic report, to which this Statement is attached, fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the periodic report to which this Statement is attached, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the registrant at the dates and for the periods indicated.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Statement as of the date first written below.



Dated: August 9, 2005



| |  |                                                            
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ DAVID C. COLLINS                                       
| |  | David C. Collins Chief Executive Officer                   
| | 
| |  | /s/ NICHOLAS R. SCHACHT                                    
| |  | Nicholas R. Schacht President (Principal Financial Officer)
#### Jorge Cortes MACEDO; Yesenia Orozco De La Paz, Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-70838.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 28, 2011.

Jorge Cortes Macedo, Riverside, CA, pro se.

Yesenia Orozco De La Paz, Riverside, CA, pro se.

Laura Halliday Hiekein, Paul Fiorino, Senior Litigation Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jorge Cortes Macedo and Yesenia Orozco De La Paz, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen. Our *678jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. *Mohammed v. Gonzales,*400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir.2005). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to reopen as untimely where the motion was filed more than a year after the final administrative order was entered in their case. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2). We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision not to invoke its sua sponte authority to reopen proceedings under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a). *See Ekimian v. INS,*303 F.3d 1153, 1159 (9th Cir.2002). If we had jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision, we would find no abuse of discretion.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ request to withdraw from their grant of voluntary departure on grounds that petitioners failed to demonstrate that they filed their motion prior to the expiration of their voluntary departure period. *See Dada v. Mukasey,*554 U.S. 1, 21, 128 S.Ct. 2307, 171 L.Ed.2d 178 (2008) (alien must be permitted to withdraw a voluntary departure request before expiration of the departure period).

Petitioners’ remaining contentions are unavailing.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

_________________________________

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

Complainant

vs.

JOSEPH LADEK

Respondent

_________________________________

Docket Number: 2023-0412

Enforcement Activity Number: 7804297

CONSENT ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

On November 14, 2023, the Coast Guard submitted a Motion for Approval of Settlement 

Agreement and Entry of Consent Order to be approved as a settlement of the case under 33 

C.F.R. § 20.502.

I have carefully reviewed the terms of the Settlement Agreement and find it is fair and 

reasonable and in substantial compliance with the requirements of 33 C.F.R. § 20.502.

WHEREFORE,

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, the Motion for Approval of Settlement Agreement and 

Entry of Consent Order is GRANTED and the Settlement Agreement is APPROVED in full 

and incorporated herein by reference. This Consent Order shall constitute full, final, and 

complete adjudication of this proceeding.

Done and dated December 1, 2023

Baltimore, Maryland

_______________________________

HON. LINEKA N. QUIJANO

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD
EXHIBIT 10.3
                        Promissory Note
$2305.00                                                June 14, 2002
                                                    Newport Beach, CA

     On Demand  for value received the undersigned promises to pay in
lawful money of the United States of America to the order of Mezzanine
Fund Management, Ltd., nominee or assignee, the sum of Two Thousand Three
Hundred Five Dollars ($2305.00), with interest from June 14, 2002 until
paid at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum).

     Should interest not be paid, it shall thereafter bear interest as the
principal, but such unpaid interest so compounded shall not exceed an
amount equal to simple interest on the principal at the maximum rate
permitted by law.  The undersigned hereby waives presentment of payment,
protest, notice of protest, notice of nonpayment, and diligence in bringing
suit, and further agrees, in case suit is instituted, to collect this
Promissory Note or any portion thereof, to pay such additional sum for
attorneys' fees as the Court may adjudge reasonable in such suit.


                                   Cygni Investment, Inc.
                                   By: /s/ Carl Suter
                                   Carl Suter, President
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1737 

To nullify certain guidance of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection 

and to provide requirements for guidance issued by the Bureau with 

respect to indirect auto lending. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 13, 2015 

Mr. GUINTA (for himself, Mr. PERLMUTTER, Mr. STUTZMAN, Mr. DAVID

SCOTT of Georgia, Mr. STIVERS, Mr. SHERMAN, Mr. WILLIAMS, Mr. KILDEE, and Mrs. BEATTY) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To nullify certain guidance of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection and to provide requirements for guidance issued by the Bureau with respect to indirect auto 

lending. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reforming CFPB Indi5 rect Auto Financing Guidance Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1737 IH

1 SEC. 2. NULLIFICATION OF AUTO LENDING GUIDANCE. 

2 Bulletin 2013–02 of the Bureau of Consumer Finan3 cial Protection (published March 21, 2013) shall have no 

4 force or effect. 

5 SEC. 3. GUIDANCE REQUIREMENTS. 

6 Section 1022(b) of the Consumer Financial Protec7 tion Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5512(b)) is amended by add8 ing at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(5) GUIDANCE ON INDIRECT AUTO FINANC10 ING.—In proposing and issuing guidance primarily 

11 related to indirect auto financing, the Bureau 

12 shall— 

13 ‘‘(A) provide for a public notice and com14 ment period before issuing the guidance in final 

15 form; 

16 ‘‘(B) make available to the public, includ17 ing on the website of the Bureau, all studies, 

18 data, methodologies, analyses, and other infor19 mation relied on by the Bureau in preparing 

20 such guidance; 

21 ‘‘(C) redact any information that is exempt 

22 from disclosure under paragraph (3), (4), (6), 

23 (7), or (8) of section 552(b) of title 5, United 

24 States Code; 

25 ‘‘(D) consult with the Board of Governors 

26 of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1737 IH

1 Trade Commission, and the Department of Jus2 tice; and 

3 ‘‘(E) conduct a study on the costs and im4 pacts of such guidance to consumers and 

5 women-owned, minority-owned, and small busi6 nesses.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS