alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission Small Business Capital Formation Advisory Committee will hold a public meeting on Monday, September 27, 2021, via videoconference.

# PLACE: 

                        The meeting will begin at 10:00 a.m. (ET) and will be open to the public. The meeting will be conducted by remote means (videoconference) and/or at the Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549. Members of the public may watch the webcast of the meeting on the Commission's website at                         *www.sec.gov.*

# STATUS: 

On September 2, 2021, the Commission published notice of the Committee meeting (Release No. 33-10976), indicating that the meeting is open to the public and inviting the public to submit written comments to the Committee. This Sunshine Act notice is being issued because a majority of the Commission may attend the meeting.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

The agenda for the meeting includes matters relating to rules and regulations affecting small and emerging businesses and their investors under the federal securities laws.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed; please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: September 17, 2021.

Vanessa A. Countryman,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2021-20533 Filed 9-17-21; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Order entered August 10 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 15
- 00417
- CV
KURT W. THOMPSON AND KAY ALYSON THOMPSON, Appellant s V. FLORIDA WOOD TREATER S, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Cou rt

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 14
- 14993



### O RDER
We GRANT appellants’ August 5, 2015 unopposed motion for extension of time to file
brie f and ORDER the brief be filed no later than September 9, 2015

. No further extensions may be granted a bsent exigent circumstances.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
             (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF
                         TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

         Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I,
James R. Crane, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of
EGL, Inc., a Texas corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify, to my knowledge,
that:

         (1) the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
         March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
         Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


Dated:   May 15, 2003                     /s/James R. Crane
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          James R. Crane
                                          President, Chief Executive Officer and
                                          Chairman of the Board

         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed
as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Order entered March 9, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00031-CV

ROBERT PHALEN, Appellant

V.

WAYNE KIRK, ET AL., Appellee

On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-00528

ORDER

By order dated February 25, 2015, the Court ordered Felicia Pitre, District Clerk of 

Dallas County, Texas to file a supplemental clerk’s record including the original petition in

intervention in this case. By letter dated March 4, 2015, the district clerk’s office responded that 

the “Original Petition in Intervention requested to be sent as a supplemental clerk’s record is 

listed on the index as no. 5 of the original Clerk’s Record” filed in this Court on February 11, 

2015. Inspection of the clerk’s record reveals that the document listed as item number five on 

the index of the clerk’s record is identified as “Order on Defendants’ Joint Motion to Sever and 

Stay Claims of Plaintiff Jamie Davis and to Sever Claims of Plaintiff Robert Phalen, January 15, 

2013.” Further inspection of the clerk’s record reveals that the “Original Petition in 

Intervention” dated September 20, 2012 and Plaintiffs’ Sixth Amended Original Petition are 
included in the clerk’s record between items number five and item six, the trial court’s June 7, 

2013 “Order to Vacate & Reinstate,” but that neither pleading is bookmarked or included in the 

index of the clerk’s record. So that the clerk’s record is useable by the Court and the parties, the 

Court ORDERS Felicia Pitre, District Clerk of Dallas County, Texas to file within FIVE (5)

days of the date of this order a corrected clerk’s record that includes both documents in the 

index and the bookmarks of the clerk’s record.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2617 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2015 

Received 

AN ACT 

To amend the Fair Minimum Wage Act of 2007 to postpone 

a scheduled increase in the minimum wage applicable 

to American Samoa. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2617 RDS

1 SECTION 1. MINIMUM WAGE FOR AMERICAN SAMOA. 

2 (a) MINIMUM WAGE.—Paragraph (2) of section 

3 8103(b) of the Fair Minimum Wage Act of 2007 (29 

4 U.S.C. 206 note) is amended to read as follows: 

5 ‘‘(2) the minimum wage applicable to American 

6 Samoa under section 6(a)(1) of the Fair Labor 

7 Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 206(a)(1)) shall 

8 be— 

9 ‘‘(A) the applicable wage rate in effect for 

10 each industry and classification as of September 

11 29, 2015; and 

12 ‘‘(B) increased by $0.50 an hour (or such 

13 lesser amount as may be necessary to equal the 

14 minimum wage under section 6(a)(1) of such 

15 Act), beginning on December 31, 2016, and on 

16 December 31 of every third year thereafter, 

17 until the minimum wage applicable to American 

18 Samoa under this paragraph is equal to the 

19 minimum wage set forth in such section.’’. 

20 (b) GAO REPORTS.—Section 8104 of the Fair Min21 imum Wage Act of 2007 (29 U.S.C. 206 note) is amend22 ed— 

23 (1) in subsection (a)— 

24 (A) by striking ‘‘September 1, 2011’’ and 

25 inserting ‘‘April 1, 2017’’; and 


smartinez on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 2617 RDS

1 (B) by striking the second sentence and in2 serting the following: ‘‘The Government Ac3 countability Office shall submit a subsequent 

4 report not later than April 1, 2020.’’; 

5 (2) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘the study 

6 under subsection (a)’’ and inserting ‘‘any report 

7 under subsection (a)’’; and 

8 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(c) REPORT ON ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF IN10 CREASING THE MINIMUM WAGE IN AMERICAN SAMOA.— 

11 Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this 

12 subsection, the Government Accountability Office shall 

13 transmit to Congress a report on alternative ways of in14 creasing the minimum wage in American Samoa to keep 

15 pace with the cost of living in American Samoa and to 

16 eventually equal the minimum wage set forth in section 

17 6(a)(1) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 

18 U.S.C. 206(a)(1)).’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 28, 

2015. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


smartinez on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2021421EN.01000701.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 18.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 421/7 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10459 — CVC/STOCK SPIRITS GROUP)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 421/06)

1.

On 7 October 2021, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2021421EN.01000701-E0001) involving the acquisition of sole control of Stock Spirits Group plc (‘Stock Spirits’) by CVC Capital Partners SICAV-FIS S.A. (‘CVC’) within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | CVC (Luxembourg); |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Stock Spirits (United-Kingdom). |

CVC acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Stock Spirits. The concentration is accomplished by way of public bid via an announcement made on 12 August 2021.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for CVC: CVC manages investment funds and platforms. One of CVC funds’ portfolio companies, Zabka Polska S.A., is active in grocery retail in Poland; |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for Stock Spirits: Stock Spirits is a producer and distributor of spirit drinks, mainly in Europe. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10459 — CVC/STOCK SPIRITS GROUP

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2021421EN.01000701-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

---
EXHIBIT 23.1








Consent of Independent Auditor




March 25, 2015





We hereby consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 of Canadian Natural Resources Limited of our report dated March 4, 2015, relating to the consolidated financial statements, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Annual Report.




We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form F-10 (File No. 333-191876) of Canadian Natural Resources Limited of our report dated March 4, 2015referred to above. We also consent to reference to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP under the heading “Interests of Experts,” which appears in the Annual Information Form included in this Annual Report on Form 40-F, which is incorporated by reference in such Registration Statement.






SIGNED “PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP”


Chartered Accountants




PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Suite 3100 – 111 5th Avenue SW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 5L3

T: +1 403 509 7500, F: +1 403 781 1825,www.pwc.com/ca



“PwC” refers to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an Ontario limited liability partnership.
Dissenting Opinion Filed August 28, 2019.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-18-01227-CV

GREG GUTMAN, Appellant

V.

RICHARD WAYNE WELLS AND 

REAL ESTATE ARBITRAGE PARTNERS, LLC, Appellees

On Appeal from the 95th District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-06158

DISSENTING OPINION

Before Justices Whitehill, Partida-Kipness, and Pedersen, III

Dissenting Opinion by Justice Partida-Kipness

I withdraw my prior dissent, and respectfully dissent to the new opinion issued today. The 

claims made by Greg Gutman do not fall within the parameters of the Declaratory Judgments Act.

See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE §§ 37.001–.011. The declaratory relief sought by Gutman will 

not terminate the controversy or remove an uncertainty. See id. § 37.003(c); see also Bonham 

State Bank v. Beadle, 907 S.W.2d 465, 468 (Tex. 1995) (“[a] trial court has discretion to enter a 

declaratory judgment so long as it will serve a useful purpose or will terminate the controversy 

between the parties.”); City of Richardson v. Gordon, 316 S.W.3d 758, 761 (Tex. App.—Dallas 

2010, no pet.) (a declaratory judgment action does not give a court jurisdiction “to pass upon 

hypothetical or contingent situations, or to determine questions not then essential to the decision 

of an actual controversy, although such questions may in the future require adjudication.”) (internal 
–2–

citations omitted). As all parties concede, there was nothing at issue about the lower court’s 

decision in the previous case, and the parties agree no judgment was entered against Wells in the 

previous case. There is, thus, no uncertainty to resolve. Further, a fair reading of Gutman’s 

petition, and the majority’s characterization of it, shows his claims are for civil harassment and, to 

the extent such a cause of action exists, sound in tort. See Tort, BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY (11th 

ed. 2019) (tort is “[a] civil wrong . . . for which a remedy may be obtained, usually in the form of 

damages.”). Any declaration regarding the parties’ rights to seek, or duties to provide, a release 

of judgment would, therefore, not terminate the controversy. 

Under no circumstances is this a proper declaratory judgment action, and I do not agree 

with the majority’s expansion of the statute. The trial court properly dismissed Gutman’s action 

pursuant to rule 91a. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 91a. Accordingly, I would affirm the trial court’s 

dismissal.

181227DF.P05

/Robbie Partida-Kipness

ROBBIE PARTIDA-KIPNESS

JUSTICE
## NO. 12

- 18

- 00183

- CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

GEORGIA PATRICK LEWI S, AKA
GEORGIA P. LEWIS, AK A GEORGIA
LEWIS, AKA GEORGIA M AE LEWIS,

AKA GEORGIA M. LEWIS , GEORGIA
LEWIS, INDIVIDUALLY DBA
DRAYCATAN ELECTRIC,

APPELLANT

V.

ELLIOTT ELECTRIC SUP PLY, INC.,

APPELLEE §

§

§ APPEAL FROM THE 145T H

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

NACOGDOCHES COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rul es of Appellate

Procedure. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c).

On July 10, 2018, the C lerk of this Court notified Appellant that the filing fee in this

appeal is due. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 5. Appellant was informed that failure to remit the filing fee

on or befo re July 20, 2018 , would result in the Court’s taking appropriate action, including

dismissal of the case without further notice. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c). The date for remitting

the filing fee has passed, and Appellant has not complied with the Court’ s request.

Because Appellant has failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 5, the appeal is

dismissed

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c).

Opinion delivered July 31, 2018.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

( PUBLISH )

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

JULY 31 , 2018

NO. 12

- 18

- 00183

- CV

GEORGIA PATRICK LEWI S, AKA GEORGIA P. LE WIS, AKA GEORGIA LEW IS,

AKA GEORGIA MAE LEWI S, AKA GEORGIA M. LE WIS, GEORGIA LEWIS,

INDIVIDUALLY DBA DRA YCATAN ELECTRIC,

Appellant

V.

ELLIOTT ELECTRIC SUP PLY, INC.,

Appellee

Appeal from the 145th District Court

of Nacogdoches County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. C1733067)

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being

consi dered, it is the opinion of this Court that this appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that

this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed ; and that this decision be certified to the court

below for obse rvance.

By per curiam opinion

. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
1

The Honorable Dean Whipple, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 09-1751

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Missouri.

Lester D. Erby, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: July 30, 2009

Filed: August 3, 2009

___________

Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Lester D. Erby appeals the district court’s1

 decision to revoke his supervised

release and the court’s imposition of a 10-month prison term as his revocation

sentence.

Upon review, we conclude that the district court properly revoked Erby’s

supervised release, see 18 U.S.C. § 3583(g)(4) (If defendant “as part of drug testing,

tests positive for illegal controlled substances more than 3 times over the course of 1
-2-

year[,] the court shall revoke the term of supervised release and require the defendant

to serve a term of imprisonment not to exceed the maximum term of imprisonment

authorized under subsection (e)(3).”), and that the revocation sentence--which was

imposed following the court’s consideration of the applicable advisory Guidelines

range and appropriate sentencing factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)--is not

unreasonable, see U.S.S.G. § 7B1.4 (policy statement) (advisory Guidelines range for

Grade C violation and Category IV criminal history is 6-12 months in prison); 18

U.S.C. § 3583(e) (specifying sentencing factors courts must consider in revocation

decision); United States v. Nelson, 453 F.3d 1004, 1006 (8th Cir. 2006) (appellate

court reviews revocation sentence to determine whether it is unreasonable in relation

to, inter alia, advisory Guidelines range and § 3553(a) factors); see also 18 U.S.C.

§ 3583(e)(3) (for Class C felony, maximum term of imprisonment upon revocation of

supervised release is 2 years).

Accordingly, we affirm. We also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, subject

to counsel informing appellant about procedures for seeking rehearing and filing a

petition for certiorari.

______________________________
#### Fabian M. ROSIMO, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.

No. 2011-3090.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 26, 2011.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Fabian M. Rosimo moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The court treats Aquino’s submission as a motion for reconsideration of the May 3, 2011 order dismissing this appeal for failure to pay the filing fee.

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.

(2) The motion for reconsideration is granted. The court’s May 3, 2011 dismissal order is vacated, and the petition is reinstated.

(3) Rosimo’s brief is due within 45 days of the date of filing of this order.
# C_2023032EN.01041601.xml

| 27.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/416 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/416

---

P9_TA(2022)0261

Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters: accession by the European Union ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 23 June 2022 on the draft Council decision concerning the accession of the European Union to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters (13494/2021 — C9-0465/2021 — 2021/0208(NLE))

(Consent)

(2023/C 32/23)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (13494/2021), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (13494/2021),

| — | having regard to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters (13494/2021 ADD 1), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters (13494/2021 ADD 1),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 81(2), point (a), and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C9-0465/2021), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 81(2), point (a), and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C9-0465/2021),

| — | having regard to Rule 105(1) and (4) and Rule 114(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 105(1) and (4) and Rule 114(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A9-0177/2022), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A9-0177/2022),

| 1. | Gives its consent to the accession of the European Union to the Convention; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

2.

---