alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2021402EN.01001201.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 5.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/12 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10400 – Alta Percier/Bridgepoint/Latour/Primonial)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 402/09)

1.

On 23 September 2021, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2021402EN.01001201-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Alta Percier, part of the Altarea group (‘Altarea’, France), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Bridgepoint SAS, ultimate parent undertaking of the Bridgepoint group (‘Bridgepoint’, UK), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Latour Capital Management SAS (‘Latour’, France), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | New Primonial Holding 2, ultimate parent undertaking of the Primonial group (‘Primonial’, France). |

Altarea, Bridgepoint and Latour acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the whole of Primonial.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for Altarea: real estate services consisting in commercial real estate activities and housing and office promotion, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for Bridgepoint: private equity, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for Latour: private equity, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for Primonial: insurance and banking and real estate services. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2021402EN.01001201-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission no later than ten days following the date on which this notification is published. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10400 – Alta Percier/Bridgepoint/Latour/Primonial

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2021402EN.01001201-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2021402EN.01001201-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
EXHIBIT 31.2




CERTIFICATION




I,  Bryan Kenyon, certify that:




1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Trycera Financial, Inc.;




2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements


were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,


and for, the periods presented in this report;




4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made


known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the


period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an


annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and




5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of


directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,


summarize and report financial information; and




b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.









Date: April 20, 2011
By:
Bryan KenyonBryan KenyonTrycera Financial, Inc.CFO and PrincipalAccounting officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 USC SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Medallion Financial Corp. (the Company) for the quarter ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my
knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates
and for the periods expressed in the Report.



|    |  |                                                  
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Larry D. Hall                                
|    |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Date: May 7, 2009



Page 59 of 59
H. R. 2458 

One Hundred Fourteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and sixteen 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 5351 Lapalco 

Boulevard in Marrero, Louisiana, as the ‘‘Lionel R. Collins, Sr. Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. LIONEL R. COLLINS, SR. POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 5351 Lapalco Boulevard in Marrero, Louisiana, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Lionel R. Collins, Sr. Post 

Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Lionel R. Collins, Sr. Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7754** 

DONNIE GEORGE MORTON , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v.
FRANK L. PERRY , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro
. Catherine C. Eagles , District Judge. ( 1:15

- cv - 00319

- CCE

- LPA )

Submitted : May 24, 2016 Decided: May 27, 2016

Before DUNCAN , AGEE , and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Donnie George Morton , Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III , Nicholaos George Vlahos , NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE , Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Donnie George Morton seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012)
. A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstratin g that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court den ies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independ ently reviewed the record and conclude that
Morton has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Morton’s motion for a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2021046EN.01000101.xml

| 9.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9866 — United Group/Forthnet)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 46/01)

On 13 August 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9866. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9866. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Exhibit 23

                        Consent of Independent Auditors

The Board of Directors
Trigon Healthcare, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
(No. 333-22463) on Form S-8 of Trigon Healthcare, Inc. of our report dated
February 7, 1997, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Trigon
Healthcare, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1995 and 1996, and the
related statements of operations, changes in surplus and cash flows for each
of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1996, which report
is incorporated by reference in the annual report on Form 10-K of Trigon
Healthcare, Inc.

                                    /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
                                    ----------------------------

Richmond, Virginia
March 31, 1997
EXHIBIT 32



Certification



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of FiberNet Telecom Group, Inc., (the
Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated: November 12, 2003 |  | /s/ MICHAEL S. LISS    
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|                         |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                         | 
|Dated: November 12, 2003 |  | /s/ JON A. DELUCA      
|                         |  | Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-51029 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. JUAN CARLOS ADAN GONZALEZ-UGARTE Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:06-CR-647-ALL Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Juan Carlos Adan Gonzalez-Ugarte (Gonzalez) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Gonzalez has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Gonzalez’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 25, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 06-51029

2 leave towithdrawis GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
#### MARSHALL *v.*UNITED STATES.

APPEAL PROM THE COURT OE CLAIMS.

No. 57.

Argued November 1, 1888. —

Decided November 19, 1888.

*Marshall*v. *United States,*124 U. S. 391, is affirmed on rehearing.

This case was heard at October Term 1887, and the judgment below was affirmed. 124 U. S. 391. A petition for rehearing was granted April 30, 1888, 127 U. S. 786, and the cause was reargued at this term.

*Mr. W. D. Da/oidge*for appellants.

*Mr. Assistant Attorney General Howo/rd*for appellees.

Mr. Chief Justice .Fuller,

on the 19th of November, 1888, announced that a majority of the court adhered to the views .expressed by Mr. Justice Harlan in the opinion of the court jn this case delivered at the last term, affirming the judgment of the Court of Claims.

*Affirmed.*

*392Mr. Justice Harlan stated that he now believed that that opinion was wrong and that he dissented from the judgment of the court.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7715

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RODNEY EARL RISPER, a/k/a Menace, a/k/a Rodney

Risper,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CR-97-134-BR)

Submitted: April 13, 2000 Decided: April 20, 2000

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rodney Earl Risper, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Aubrey West, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* The district court also denied Risper’s request for the

return of a firearm and an address book. He has waived any

challenge to the court’s denial as to those two items because he

did not address those items in his informal brief. See 4th Cir. R.

34(b).

2

PER CURIAM:

Rodney Risper appeals the district court’s order denying his

motion filed under Rule 41(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal

Procedure. Risper sought the return of $5000 seized when he was

arrested.* We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Risper,

No. CR-97-134-BR (E.D.N.C. Nov. 19, 1999). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Allan R. Malamy, Appellant, v Linda J. Malamy, Respondent.

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Sehackman, J.), entered on November 15, 1985, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Sehackman, J., at Special Term, without costs and without disbursements. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Kassal, Rosenberger and Wallach, JJ.
TIMPAS CREEK AT MOUTH NEAR SWINK, CO  Latitude: 38.003Longitude: -103.656Elevation: 4120

Timpas Creek at mouth near Swink, CO
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Chinawe.com Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Man
Keung Wai, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Man Keung Wai
Man Keung Wai
Chief Executive Officer
Date:  August 22, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Chinawe.com Inc. and will be
retained by Chinawe.com Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
```
<PAGE>
                                                                   Page 20 of 20


                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(h)

Key Bank USA, National Association         Bankers Trust Company
127 Public Square                            as Indenture Trustee
Cleveland, Ohio  44114-1306                4 Albany Street, 7th Floor
                                           New York, New York  10015

Bank One, National Association             MBIA Insurance Corporation
  as Eligible Lender Trustee                 as Surety Provider
One First National Plaza Suite 0126        113 King Street
Chicago, Illinois  60670                   Armonk, New York 10504

                         INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT
                      FOR KEYCORP STUDENT LOAN TRUST 2000-A

We have examined management's assertion, included in its representation letter
dated March 19, 2002 that Key Bank USA, National Association (KBUSA), a wholly
owned subsidiary of KeyCorp, complied with sections 4.04, 4.08(a), 4.08(b),
4.08(c), 5.05, 5.06, 5.07 and 5.08 of the KeyCorp Student Loan Trust 2000-A Sale
and Servicing Agreement and sections 1.(a)(xx), 1.(b)(iii), 2 and 3 of the
KeyCorp Student Loan Trust 2000-A Administration Agreement (collectively, the
"Agreements") as of December 31, 2001 and for the year then ended. Management is
responsible for KBUSA's compliance with those requirements. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on management's assertion about KBUSA's compliance
based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about KBUSA's
compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances, except that in accordance with
Section 5.05 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement, our examination assumed the
accuracy of reports prepared by KBUSA's student loan processor. We believe that
our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination
does not provide a legal determination on KBUSA's compliance with the specified
requirements.

In our opinion, assuming the accuracy of reports prepared by KBUSA's student
loan processor, management's assertion that KBUSA complied with the
aforementioned requirements as of December 31, 2001 and for the year then ended
is fairly stated, in all material respects.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of KBUSA, Bankers
Trust Company, Bank One, National Association and MBIA Insurance Corporation and
is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than for these
specified parties.


                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


March 19, 2002