alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 13.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                       of
                            Periodic Financial Report
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
                                  Section 1350

I, John A.A. James, President and Chief Executive Officer of Aurora Metals (BVI)
Limited, hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the Fiscal Year
ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Aurora Metals (BVI) Limited


June 27, 2005                           By: (s) John A.A. James
                                        -----------------------
                                        John A.A. James President and Director


This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard set forth therein, and not for any other
purpose. It is not being filed as part of the Annual Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
#### Coppell et *al. v.*Phillipson.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.*

July 18, 1890.)

Appeal from circuit court, New York county.

Argued before Van Bkunt, P. J., and Brady and Daniels, JJ.

*Lewis Sanders,*for appellant. *G. L. Hives,*for respondents.

Brady, J.

This case is controlled by the case of *Coppell*v. *Phillipson, ante,*901, (decided herewith.) The judgment must he affirmed, with costs. All concur.
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Ben Jamil, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Security Intelligence
Technologies, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors:

      a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

Dated: October 12, 2006

                                              /s/ Ben Jamil
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Ben Jamil, Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A)
RAYTEL MEDICAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           8,077
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,295<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                48,905
<PP&E>                                          46,050
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,672
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 126,197
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,777
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                      69,297
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   126,197
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,861
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   47,246
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (86)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F2>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,286
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,415
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,722
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,693
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,693
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.30
<FN>
<F1>(RECEIVABLES) Represents net receivables
<F2>(LOSS-PROVISIONS) Included in (TOTAL-COSTS)
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 15

- 00151

- CR

Ex parte Omar Bashir Mohammed §

§

§

§

§ From Criminal District Court No. 2

of Tarrant County (1359991D)

August 2 7, 2015

Opinion by Justice Walker

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the

trial court denying Appellant’s request for bond pending appeal is reversed

, and

this case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this

opinion

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

__ /s/ Sue Walker

___________________ Justice Sue Walker
#### Brooklyn Union Gas Company, Respondent, v City of New York et al., Appellants.

— Appeal by the defendant from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated April 9, 1985.

*435Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, for reasons stated by Justice Kuffner in his memorandum decision dated October 1, 1984. Mangano, J. P., Brown, Kunzeman and Spatt, JJ., concur.
#### Island Recycling Corp. et al., Appellants, v New York State Department of Taxation and Finance et al., Respondents.

Submitted February 16, 2007;

decided May 1, 2007

On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. Motion for leave to appeal denied.
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, David She, the Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer of AMERICAN LORAIN CORPORATION (the Company), DO HEREBY CERTIFY
that:

| | 1. | The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
      year ended December 31, 2010 (the Report), fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
| | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
      the Company.                                                       

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this
statement this 31st day of March 2011.

/s/ David She David She Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to American Lorain Corporation and will be retained by
American Lorain Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to §18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

---
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Genevieve S. Robinson, Deceased. Shirley R. Pierce, Appellant; Susan Syquia, Respondent.

— Kane, J. P.

Appeal from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Broome County (Thomas, S.), entered July 9, 1985, which adjudged that respondent has title to certain silverware as the result of a valid inter vivos gift of said silverware to respondent by decedent.

The record supports the finding of Surrogate’s Court that decedent made a valid inter vivos gift of the silverware in question to her daughter, respondent, in 1977. Accordingly, the decree should be affirmed.

Decree affirmed, without costs. Kane, J. P., Main, Casey, Yesawich, Jr., and Levine, JJ., concur.
PATRICK M. HOLZINGER

,
Appellant,

v.

JODI M. HOLZINGER

,
Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 17

- 1079

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 12, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County

. Marci L. Goodman

, Judge

.
Stephen R. Hogan of Law Office of Stephen R. Hogan, P.A., Pensacola , for Appellant.

James L. Chase and Hunter R. Higdon of James L. Chase & Associates, PLC, Pensacola , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE

, MAKAR

, and JAY

, J J

. , CONCUR.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2514 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prevent veterans from 

being disqualified from contributing to health savings accounts by reason 

of receiving medical care for service-connected disabilities under programs 

administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 21, 2015 

Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas (for himself, Mr. THOMPSON of California, Mr. 

BABIN, Mr. BUTTERFIELD, Mr. COFFMAN, Mr. NUGENT, Mr. OLSON, 

Mr. PALAZZO, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. REICHERT, Mr. ROE of Tennessee, Mr. 

RUSH, Mr. TAKAI, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. ZINKE, Ms. 

MCSALLY, and Mr. SABLAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prevent 

veterans from being disqualified from contributing to 

health savings accounts by reason of receiving medical 

care for service-connected disabilities under programs administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Helping Veterans Save 

5 for Health Care Act of 2015’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2514 IH

1 SEC. 2. VETERANS NOT DISQUALIFIED FROM HEALTH SAV2 INGS ACCOUNT BY REASON OF RECEIVING 

3 MEDICAL CARE FOR SERVICE-CONNECTED 

4 DISABILITIES UNDER PROGRAMS ADMINIS5 TERED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 

6 AFFAIRS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 223(c)(1) of the Internal 

8 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

9 the following new subparagraph: 

10 ‘‘(C) SPECIAL RULE FOR INDIVIDUALS ELI11 GIBLE FOR CERTAIN VETERANS BENEFITS.—An 

12 individual shall not fail to be treated as an eli13 gible individual for any period merely because 

14 the individual receives hospital care or medical 

15 services under any law administered by the Sec16 retary of Veterans Affairs for a service-con17 nected disability (within the meaning of section 

18 101(16) of title 38, United States Code).’’. 

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

20 this section shall apply to months beginning after the date 

21 of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2592 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2592

    To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to require the Federal 
 Communications Commission to publish on the website of the Commission 
              documents to be voted on by the Commission.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 1, 2015

 Mr. Kinzinger of Illinois (for himself and Mr. Allen) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to require the Federal 
 Communications Commission to publish on the website of the Commission 
              documents to be voted on by the Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PUBLICATION OF DOCUMENTS IN ADVANCE OF FCC VOTING.

    (a) In General.--Section 4 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 
U.S.C. 154) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(p)(1) The Commission may not adopt any order, decision, report, 
or action by vote of the Commission, unless the Chairman causes the 
Commission to publish on the Internet website of the Commission the 
text of such order, decision, report, or action--
            ``(A) not later than 24 hours after the time such text is 
        placed on circulation for review by the Commissioners; or
            ``(B) not later than 21 days before the date on which the 
        vote is to occur.
    ``(2) The text published pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be the 
text intended at the time of the publishing to be subject to a vote. 
Nothing in this subsection may be construed to prevent the Commission 
from making changes to the text after the publishing.
    ``(3) This subsection shall not apply to a portion of any order, 
decision, report, or action if the publishing of such portion is likely 
to lead to a result described in a paragraph of section 552b(c) of 
title 5, United States Code.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
with respect to an order, decision, report, or action the text of which 
is placed on circulation after the date that is 90 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Teddy Porter, Appellant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Paul Bookson, J.), rendered on July 29, 1985, convicting defendant, following a jury trial, of one count of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted bail jumping in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a predicate felon, to concurrent terms of imprisonment of 4Vi to 9 years and lVi to 3 years, respectively, is modified on the law to the extent of reducing the sentence on the charge of attempted bail jumping in the first degree to one year to be served concurrently with the sentence on the other offense, and otherwise affirmed.

Defendant asserts, and the People agree, that the sentence of 1 Vi to 3 years’ imprisonment, which he received in connection with his conviction for attempted bail jumping in the first degree was illegal. At the time that sentence was imposed, bail jumping in the first degree was a class D felony (Penal Law § 215.57). Attempted bail jumping in the first degree was thus a class E felony (Penal Law § 110.05), and defendant was *583sentenced accordingly. However, the classification of the crime involved had been changed by statutory amendment (L 1983, ch 277, § 2) subsequent to the date that defendant failed to appear in court on May 23, 1983, or 30 days thereafter. Since the offense was committed when the prior statutory scheme was in effect, and bail jumping in the first degree was then a class E felony, rendering attempted bail jumping in the first degree a class A misdemeanor, the maximum permissible sentence was one year in jail (Penal Law § 70.15). We have considered defendant’s other assertions and find them to be without merit. Concur — Sandler, J. P., Sullivan, Ross, Milonas and Wallach, JJ.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

GARY FAIN JOHNSON, JR., )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-3239

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed January 2, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota

County; Debra Johnes Riva, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Rachel Roebuck, Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and Elba Caridad Martin, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, 

for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

SILBERMAN, BLACK, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
**Exhibit 23**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Stockholders of Coldwater Creek Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-82260, 333-60099, and 333-31699) on Forms S-8 of Coldwater Creek Inc.of our reports dated June 20, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Coldwater Creek Inc. as of January 28, 2006 and January 29, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity,and cash flows for the fiscal years ended January 28, 2006, January 29, 2005, and January 31, 2004, and the related financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting as of January 28, 2006 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of January 28, 2006, which reports appear in the January 28, 2006, annual report on Form 10-K/A of Coldwater Creek Inc.

Our report dated June 20, 2006, on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of January 28, 2006, expresses our opinion that Coldwater Creek Inc. did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of January 28, 2006 because of theeffect of a material weakness on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria and contains an explanatory paragraph that states the Company lacked technical expertise to evaluate revenue arrangements containing multiple deliverables andeffectively identify and analyze the terms of such arrangements to ensure financial reporting complied with generally accepted accounting principles. As a result, the Company restated the interim financial statements in its quarterly reports onForm 10-Q for the quarters ended July 30, 2005 and October 29, 2005 and the annual financial statements and the quarterly information included in its Form 10-K for the year ended January 28, 2006 to correct an overstatement incredit card marketing revenue. 

Our report dated June 20, 2006, on the consolidated financial statements of Coldwater Creek Inc. and subsidiariescontains an explanatory paragraph indicating that the Company restated its consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2006 in order to correct an error in accounting for fees received under its co-brandedcustomer credit-card program. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Boise, Idaho 

June 20, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE JUNE 30,
1999 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,424
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                       837
<INVENTORY>                                      2,152
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,105
<PP&E>                                           6,432
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,653
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,699
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,146
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            89
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,390
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,699
<SALES>                                         29,657
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,657
<CGS>                                           13,765
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,765
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   812
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  39
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    618
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                618
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       618
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07


</TABLE>