alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2448 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2448

 To amend the Public Health Service Act to authorize a program of high-
                      risk, high-reward research.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 19, 2015

  Mr. Harris introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Public Health Service Act to authorize a program of high-
                      risk, high-reward research.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HIGH-RISK, HIGH-REWARD RESEARCH.

    Part B of title IV of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 284 
et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 409K. HIGH-RISK, HIGH-REWARD RESEARCH PROGRAM.

    ``The director of each national research institute shall, as 
appropriate--
            ``(1) establish programs to conduct or support research 
        projects that pursue innovative approaches to major 
        contemporary challenges in biomedical research that involve 
        inherent high risk, but have the potential to lead to 
        breakthroughs; and
            ``(2) set aside a specific percentage of funding, to be 
        determined by the Director of NIH for each national research 
        institute, for such projects.''.
                                 <all>
```
exv10w6wc






Exhibit 10.6(c)




June 9,
2009




Campbell & Company, Inc.

2850 Quarry Lake Drive

Baltimore, MD 21209

Attn: Ms. Theresa Becks




     Re: Management Agreement Renewals



Dear Ms. Becks:




We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which
reference is made below (the “Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the
Management Agreements through June 30, 2010 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements
will remain unchanged.





	 	•	 	Smith Barney Potomac Futures Fund L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	Citigroup Global Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	Citigroup  Diversified 2000 Futures Fund L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	CMF Campbell Master Fund L.P.





Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it
to the attention of Ms. Jennifer Magro at the address above or fax to 212-793-1986. If you have any
questions I can be reached at 212-559-5046.




Very truly yours,




	 	 	 	 	 
	CITIGROUP MANAGED FUTURES LLC

 	 
	By:  	/s/ Jennifer Magro
 	 
	 	Jennifer Magro 	 
	 	Chief Financial Officer & Director 	 
	 
	CAMPBELL & COMPANY, INC.

 	 
	By:  	/s/ Thomas P. Lloyd
 	 
	 	Print Name:  	Thomas P. Lloyd 
 	 
	 	JM/sr
#### TOWNSEND v. WORK et al.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.

June 18, 1894.)

Mechanics’ Liens—Canceling Lis Pendens.

After the complaint in an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien has been dismissed by the referee as against the owner of the premises, no lien can be established, but plaintiff, if diligent, may proceed with the action in order to enable him to appeal from the judgment to be entered on the report of the referee; and a delay by plaintiff of more than a year is unreasonable neglect, within Code Civ. Proc. § 1674, providing for canceling notice of lis pendens.

*792Appeal from special term, Queens county. .

Action by Charles De Kay Townsend against Emma M. Work, impleaded with Albert O. Hendrickson and others, to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. From an order canceling plaintiff’s lis pendens,, plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

Argued before BROWN, P. J., and DYKMAN and CULLEN, JJ.

Mortimer S. Brown, for appellant.

Marbury & Fox (Charles Fox, of counsel), for respondents.

DYKMAN, J.

This is an appeal from an order directing the cancellation of the notice of lis pendens filed in the action. The action is by the assignee of a mechanic’s lien to procure the foreclosure thereof. A referee was appointed on the 29th day of November. 1892, to hear and determine the action; and the trial proceeded before him until the 29th day of March, 1893, when the complaint was dismissed, as against the defendant Emma M. Work, the owner of the premises. After such dismissal, no lien could be established against the property; and the only reason for the continuation of the action was to enable the plaintiff to appeal from the judgment to be entered upon the report of the referee, when it should be made. In that situation the plaintiff was required to use active diligence to bring the trial to a close, to the end that an appeal could be taken. Instead of activity, there was a delay of one year before the order was made from which this appeal is taken. In the meantime the plaintiff received an admonition from the court when the order for the cancellation of the lis pendens was denied, in December, 1892, with leave to renew the motion unless the plaintiff proceeded diligently with the action. We think the plaintiff has unreasonably neglected to proceed in the action, within the intention of section 1674 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and that the order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002***

 

Inconnection with the amended Annual Report of GeoPetro Resources Company (the “Company”)on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned, Stuart J. Doshi , Chief Executive Officer, and J. ChrisSteinhauser, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge, that:

 

(1)      The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)      The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:  December 4, 2009 | /s/  Stuart J. Doshi                |
|--------------------------|-------------------------------------|
|                     | Stuart  J. Doshi                    |
|                     | President,  Chief Executive Officer |
|                     | and  Chairman of the Board          |
|                     |                                |
| Dated:  December 4, 2009 | /s/  J. Chris Steinhauser           |
|                     | J.  Chris Steinhauser               |
|                     | Chief  Financial Officer            |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to GeoPetro Resources Company and will be retained by GeoPetroResources Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

 

----

*                 This certification is being furnished solelyto accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is notbeing filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing ofthe Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of anygeneral incorporation language in such filing.

 

----
#### In the Matter of Linda G. Nelson Maddox, Appellant, v State University of New York at Albany et al., Respondents.

Submitted April 2, 2007;

decided May 8, 2007

*978Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied *[see 8*NY3d 803], Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0355

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

MISTY JADE MITCHELL,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including February 26, 2021, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 19 2021

01/19/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0355
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2573 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to furnish headstones and markers for the graves of dependents 

of veterans buried in county, private, or other cemeteries. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 22, 2015 

Mr. NORCROSS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to furnish headstones and 

markers for the graves of dependents of veterans buried 

in county, private, or other cemeteries. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS FUR4 NISHED HEADSTONES AND MARKERS FOR 

5 GRAVES OF VETERANS’ SPOUSES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2306 of title 38, United 

7 States Code, is amended— 

8 (1) in subsection (a)— 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2573 IH

1 (A) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘section 

2 2402(a)(4), (5), and (6)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 

3 2402(a)(4) and (6)’’; and 

4 (B) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘section 

5 2402(a)(5)’’ and all that follows through the 

6 period and inserting the following: ‘‘paragraph 

7 (5) or (9) of section 2402(a) of this title who 

8 is buried in any cemetery in the United 

9 States.’’; and 

10 (2) in subsection (d)— 

11 (A) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘, (4),’’ 

12 after ‘‘paragraph (2)’’; and 

13 (B) in paragraph (4), by inserting ‘‘, or as 

14 a dependent of a veteran’’ after ‘‘status as a 

15 veteran’’. 

16 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

17 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to deaths occurring 

18 on or after November 11, 1998. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Steiner v. City of Greenville.

Appeal from Butler Chancery Court.

Heard before the Hon. Jere N. Williams.

J. C. Richardson, for appellant.

Lane & Crenshaw, for appellee.

Opinion by

McClellan, C. J.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Higgins *et al. v.*Union Trust Co. *et al.*

*(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.*

May 23, 1890.)

Wills—Action to Construe—Jurisdiction.

An action to construe a will for the purpose of having it declared invalid cannot" be maintained in the supreme court, where complete relief can be obtained in the surrogate’s court.

Appeal from special term, New York county.

Action by Fannie Higgins and others against the Union Trust Company and others, to construe the will of Elizabeth J. Bryant, deceased. The complaint was dismissed, and plaintiffs appeal.

Argued before Van Brunt, P. J., and Bartlett and Barrett, JJ.

*David S. Remsen,*for appellants. *Alfred H. Byrd,*for respondent Union Trust Co. *William O. Beecher,*for infant respondents.

Van Brunt, P. J.

This action is brought by the plaintiffs as heirs at law and next of kin of Elizabeth J. Bryant, the testatrix herein, to construe her will for the sole purpose of having the same declared invalid. It seems to us clear that the action ought not to be entertained. *Anderson*v. *Anderson,*112 N. Y. 104, 19 N. E. Rep. 427; *Horton*v. *Cantwell,*108 N. Y. 255, 15 N. E. Rep. 546; *Weed v. Weed,*94 N. Y. 243; *Wager*v. *Wager,*89 N. Y. 161; *Chipman*v. *Montgomery,*63 N. Y. 221. If it should be claimed that the case of *Wager*v. *Wager,*89 N. Y. 161, is an authority to the contrary, an examination of that case shows that the court expressly recognized the right of the supreme court to refuse to entertain jurisdiction where complete relief can be obtained in the surrogate’s court. In the case at bar, complete relief can be had in the surrogate’s court, and there seems to be no good reason why this court should be called upon to do that which can be just as well disposed of in the surrogate’s court. Objection is raised as to the allowances made in the decree, because there is no basis shown for these allowances. As the case does not purport to contain all the evidence, we cannot tell whether it contained proof justifying the allowances or not. The judgment should be modified by striking therefrom the words “on the merits, ” and, as thus modified, affirmed, with costs to the respondents. All concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Abraham Silva, Also Known as Jose Lopez, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from three judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Maraño, J.), all rendered September 26, 1984, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree under indictment No. 340/83, criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fourth degree under indictment No. 6150/83, and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree under indictment No. 5160/84, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The defendant, by failing to challenge the propriety of the plea proceedings before the court of first instance, has failed to preserve the issue for appellate consideration *(see, People v Pellegrino,*60 NY2d 636). In any event, the record discloses that the defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived his constitutional rights after a full and complete allocution *(see, People v Harris,*61 NY2d 9).

Nor do we find any abuse of discretion with respect to the sentences imposed. Mangano, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2607 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2607

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 22, 2016

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 7802 37th Avenue in Jackson Heights, New York, as the ``Jeanne and 
                 Jules Manford Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JEANNE AND JULES MANFORD POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 7802 37th Avenue in Jackson Heights, New York, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Jeanne and Jules Manford Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Jeanne and 
Jules Manford Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 21, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
# C_2022443EN.01014401.xml

| 22.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 443/144 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 443/144

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down specific and temporary measures, in view of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, concerning driver documents issued by Ukraine in accordance with its legislation

(COM(2022) 313 final — 2022/0204 (COD))

(2022/C 443/21)

| Referral | Council, 28.6.2022
  European Parliament, 4.7.2022 |
| --- | --- |
| Legal basis | Article 91 and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union |
| Section responsible | Transport, Energy, Infrastructure and the Information Society |
| Adopted at plenary | 13.7.2022 |
| Plenary session No | 571 |
| Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions) | 195/4/3 |

Referral

Council, 28.6.2022

European Parliament, 4.7.2022

Legal basis

Article 91 and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Section responsible

Transport, Energy, Infrastructure and the Information Society

Adopted at plenary

13.7.2022

Plenary session No

571

Outcome of vote

(for/against/abstentions)

195/4/3

Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 13 July 2022.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Christa SCHWENG

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF FIRST COMMONWEALTH, INC. AS OF MARCH 31,
1998, AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         11,266
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   4,172
<ALLOWANCES>                                      360
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               19,137
<PP&E>                                          4,181
<DEPRECIATION>                                  2,489
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 34,386
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           9,740
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            4
<OTHER-SE>                                     24,245
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   34,386
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               15,615
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  14,042
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   36
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,537
<INCOME-TAX>                                      624
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               913
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      913
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.24
        

</TABLE>
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 60753 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
NATHANIEL COOPER , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:14

- CR

- 2

- 2

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Nathaniel Cooper appeals his 22

- month sentence for making false or fraudulent claims against the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 287. He challenges the district court’s determination of the amount of l oss attributable to him and its denial of a minor role adjustment. The Government moves to dismiss the appeal, arguing that it is barred by the appeal waiver in Cooper’s plea agreement. In the alternative, the Government moves for summary

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 6, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-60753 Document: 00513786557 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/06/2016No. 15

- 60753

2 affirmance based on the appeal waiver. Cooper opposes both motions. Because we conclude that Cooper’s challenges to his sentence fail on the merits , w e pretermit the question whether the waiver bars the instant appeal and , accordingly, deny the Governmen t’s motions

. See United States v. Story , 439 F.3d 226, 230

- 31 (5th Cir. 2006)

. Cooper argues first that the loss amount , which resulted in a six

- level guidelines enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1(b)(1)(D) , was erroneous. Although he objected to the loss amount in the district court , Cooper withdrew that objection, thereby waiving any claim of error. See United States v. Conn , 657 F.3d 280, 286 (5th Cir. 2011) . “Waived errors are entirely unreviewable[.]” United States v. Musquiz , 45 F.3d 927, 931 (5th Cir. 1995)

. Next, Cooper asserts that the district court erred by denying him a minor role adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 because he was merely a “runner” for a codefendant , who was the ringleader. We have reviewed the record in light of Cooper’s arguments. Cooper fails to show that the district court’s ruling was clearly erroneous. See United States v. Villanueva , 408 F.3d 193, 2 03

- 04 (5th Cir. 2005)

. The Government’s motions to dismiss or, altern atively, for summary affirmance are DENIED. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Case: 15-60753 Document: 00513786557 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/06/2016
----

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Si Chen, the Chief Executive Officer ofAMERICAN LORAIN CORPORATION (the "Company"), DO HEREBY CERTIFY that: 

1.

The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal yearended December 31, 2008 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
2.

Information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operation of the Company. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this5th day of April 2010. 

/s/ Si Chen       Si Chen Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to American Lorain Corporation and will beretained by American Lorain Corporation and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

The forgoing certification is being furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission pursuant to §18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It isnot being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing ofthe Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of anygeneral incorporation language in such filing.