1

Supreme Court

No. 2018-304-Appeal.

(P 11-236)

Ana Tsonos :

v. :

Nicholas Tsonos. :

O R D E R

This case came before the Supreme Court pursuant to an order directing the parties to 

appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not be summarily decided. The 

defendant, Nicholas Tsonos, appeals from a Family Court order granting the motion of the 

plaintiff, Ana Tsonos, to relocate to Florida with the parties’ three minor children. After 

considering the parties’ written and oral submissions and reviewing the record, and in light of 

information revealed at oral argument, we dismiss this appeal as moot. 

Comprehensive details on this case are available in Tsonos v. Tsonos, No. 2018-150, ---

A.3d --- (R.I. 2019). Ana and Nicholas1 were married in August 2003, and they had three children. 

Ana filed for divorce in February 2011, citing irreconcilable differences. The parties entered into 

a marital settlement agreement in August 2011, and final judgment entered in the divorce on 

February 14, 2012. The agreement provided, among other terms, that the parties share joint 

 

1 We refer to the parties in this case by their first names for the sake of clarity because they share 

the same surname. We intend no disrespect by doing so. 
2

custody of their three minor children and assigned physical possession to Ana with visitation for 

Nicholas. 

On April 25, 2018, prior to the above appeal being docketed in this Court, Ana filed a 

motion in the Family Court to relocate to Florida with the three children, and Nicholas objected.

The case was docketed in this Court, and we remanded it to the Family Court on June 28, 2018. 

The motion was heard on July 19, 2018, during which hearing Ana testified that she wished to 

relocate because she had received a job offer to be a fourth-grade teacher at a public school in Fort 

Myers, Florida. The trial justice granted Ana’s motion in a bench decision rendered on July 26, 

2018, and Nicholas filed a notice of appeal. 

During oral argument before this Court on October 3, 2019, Ana’s counsel represented that 

Ana had not accepted the job in Florida and is currently working at a private school in Providence. 

The issues raised in the instant appeal are therefore moot because Ana is no longer seeking to 

relocate to Florida; the trial justice’s decision was based upon Ana’s testimony regarding a 

particular job offer in Florida and the logistics of moving to Florida, but ultimately Ana did not 

move. The order of the Family Court no longer has any effect. Accordingly, we dismiss this 

appeal and remand the record of the case to the Family Court.

Entered as an Order of this Court this 18th day of December, 2019.

By Order,

_________________________________

Clerk 

/s/
SU‐CMS‐02B (revised November 2016)

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS 

SUPREME COURT – CLERK’S OFFICE 

ORDER COVER SHEET 

Title of Case Ana Tsonos v. Nicholas Tsonos.

Case Number No. 2018-304-Appeal. 

(P 11-236)

Date Order Filed December 18, 2019 

Justices Suttell, C.J., Goldberg, Flaherty, Robinson, and 

Indeglia, JJ.

Source of Appeal Providence County Family Court 

Judicial Officer From Lower Court General Magistrate Felix E. Gill

 

Attorney(s) on Appeal 

For Plaintiff: 

Tiffinay A. Antoch, Esq. 

For Defendant: 

Nicholas Tsonos, Pro Se