alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                       3,803,878
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,483,719
<ALLOWANCES>                                    39,417
<INVENTORY>                                    456,487
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,749,079
<PP&E>                                         699,937
<DEPRECIATION>                                 159,904
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,803,517
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          764,607
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,726
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,950,242
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,803,517
<SALES>                                      2,879,389
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,879,389
<CGS>                                        1,133,549
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,133,549
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,894,099
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                10,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (115,245)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (43,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (72,245)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (72,245)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### SEAGER Respondent, v. CHURCHILL, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

April, 1896.)

Action by William B. Seager against John Churchill, as executor of the will of Mary Hyatt, Deceased.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with costs.
Exhibit 32.2


                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of China BAK Battery,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-KSB for the fiscal year ended  September  30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities  Exchange  Commission  on the  date  hereof  (the  "Report").  I, Han
Yongbin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:


     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

By: /s/ Han Yongbin
   -----------------------
   Han Yongbin
   Chief Financial Officer
   January 27, 2006
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 17, 2021

b0310 

# Order

Clerk March 17, 2021

162353

In re BOOKER/ANTHONY, Minors. SC: 162353

COA: 351237

Wayne CC Family Division:

17

- 000905

- NA

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 12, 2020

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented sho uld be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheet as of September 30, 1999, and the Statement of Operations for the period
then ended and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          14,880
<SECURITIES>                                    20,187
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,669
<ALLOWANCES>                                       164
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,057
<PP&E>                                           7,162
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,761
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  46,228
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,817
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           173
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,854
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    46,228
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,629
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,288
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,006
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (43,285)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (43,285)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (3.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.10)


</TABLE>
#### Carlos Manuel VALENZUELA-MORALES, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-71866.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*715Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 28, 2011.

Shan D. Potts, Esquire, Law Offices of Larry W. Smith, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

David V. Bernal, Assistant Director, OIL, Lindsay Elizabeth Williams, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, CAC-District Counsel, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Carlos Manuel Valenzuela-Morales, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition for review.

In his opening brief, Valenzuela-Morales fails to address, and therefore has waived any challenge to, the BIA’s dispositive alternative holding that Valenzuela-Morales did not warrant a favorable exercise of discretion. *See Kumar v. Gonzales,*444 F.3d 1043, 1055 (9th Cir.2006) (“[W]e will not ordinarily consider matters on appeal that are not specifically and distinctly argued in appellant’s opening brief.”) (citation omitted).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. In light of our disposition, we do not reach Valenzuela-Morales’s remaining contentions.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                   [Letterhead of Harbor Global Company Ltd.]

               LETTER TO COMMISSION PURSUANT TO TEMPORARY NOTE 3T

                                                                 March 20, 2002


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549-0408

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Temporary Note 3T to Article 3 of Regulation S-X, Harbor Global
Company Ltd. has obtained a letter of representation from Arthur Andersen LLP
("Andersen") stating that the December 31, 1999 audit was subject to their
quality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide
reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance with
professional standards, that there was appropriate continuity of Andersen
personnel working on the audit, availability of national office consultation,
and availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Andersen to conduct the
relevant portions of the audit.

                                           Very truly yours,


                                           /s/ Donald H. Hunter

                                           Donald H. Hunter
                                           Chief Financial Officer
                                           Harbor Global Company Ltd.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2590 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2590

     To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to include certain 
    individuals who work on farms or ranches as individuals who are 
 employed in public service jobs for purposes of eligibility for loan 
           forgiveness under the Federal Direct Loan program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 1, 2015

  Mr. Gibson (for himself and Mr. Courtney) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 
                               Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to include certain 
    individuals who work on farms or ranches as individuals who are 
 employed in public service jobs for purposes of eligibility for loan 
           forgiveness under the Federal Direct Loan program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Young Farmer Success Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY OF CERTAIN FARM AND RANCH WORKERS FOR STUDENT LOAN 
              FORGIVENESS.

    (a) Eligibility.--Section 455(m)(3)(B) of the Higher Education Act 
of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087e(m)(3)(B)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or'' at the end of clause (i);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of clause (ii) and 
        inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new clause:
                            ``(iii) a full-time job as an employee or 
                        manager of a qualified farm or ranch.''.
    (b) Definition.--Section 455(m)(3) of such Act (20 U.S.C. 
1087e(m)(3)) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subparagraph:
                    ``(C) Qualified farm or ranch.--The term `qualified 
                farm or ranch' means, with respect to a year, a farm or 
                ranch whose earnings of gross revenue during the year 
                from the sale of agricultural products are equal to or 
                greater than--
                            ``(i) in the case of 2015, $35,000; or
                            ``(ii) in the case of any succeeding year, 
                        the amount applicable under this subparagraph 
                        for the previous year increased by the 
                        estimated percentage change in the Consumer 
                        Price Index (as determined by the Secretary, 
                        using the definition in section 478(f)) for the 
                        most recent year preceding such year.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM RAINTREE'S
UNAUDITED  CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE 5 MOS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY  REFERENCE TO SUCH  CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   5-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            FEB-01-1999 <F1>
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          3,157
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  20,578
<ALLOWANCES>                                    3,654
<INVENTORY>                                     1,530
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               23,151
<PP&E>                                         53,710
<DEPRECIATION>                                  8,041
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                128,137
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          64,164
<BONDS>                                        75,752
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            8
<OTHER-SE>                                     13,070
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  128,137
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               52,883
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  46,272
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                8,143
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                1,656
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              3,808
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,996)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,996)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,996)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.92)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0

<FN>
<F1> RainTree Healthcare Corporation emerged from Chapter 11 on January 31, 1999
     and adopted fresh start  reporting in accordance with Statement of Position
     90-7. Accordingly, the Company's  post-reorganization  financial statements
     have not been prepared on a consistent  basis with such  pre-reorganization
     financial  statements  and are not  comparable in all respects to financial
     statements prior to reorganization.
</FN>


</TABLE>
# C_2021459EN.01002401.xml

| 12.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 459/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 459/24

---

EUROPEAN INSTITUTE OF INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2020

(2021/C 459/24)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://eit.europa.eu/sites/default/files/eit_-_2020_final_annual_accounts.docx_.pdf.pdf

---
#### HIRSHBACH v. KETCHUM.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July, 1896.)

Action by Simon Hirshbach against Alexander P. Ketehum.

No opinion. As this court, as now constituted, cannot hear this application, the motion must stand over to be brought on before the court at its next session on September 8th. See 39 N. Y. Supp. 291, and 40 N. Y. Supp. 1143.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2511 

To condition the eligiblity of disabled children aged 16 or 17 for supplemental 

security income benefits on school attendance. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 21, 2015 

Mr. REED (for himself and Mr. BOUSTANY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To condition the eligiblity of disabled children aged 16 or 

17 for supplemental security income benefits on school 

attendance. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘School Attendance Im5 proves Lives Act of 2015’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2511 IH

1 SEC. 2. SSI BENEFITS FOR DISABLED CHILDREN AGED 16 

2 OR 17 CONDITIONED ON SCHOOL ATTEND3 ANCE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1614(a)(3)(C) of the So5 cial Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1382c(a)(3)(C)) is amended 

6 by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(iii) Notwithstanding clause (i) of this subpara8 graph, an individual who has attained 16 years of age but 

9 not 18 years of age shall not be considered an eligible indi10 vidual for a month for purposes of this title unless the 

11 individual is a full-time elementary or secondary school 

12 student (within the meaning of section 202(d)(7) and the 

13 regulations promulgated under such section), except where 

14 the Commissioner determines that the individual has good 

15 medical cause, corroborated by a treating physician, to not 

16 attend school for part or all of the month.’’. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

18 subsection (a) shall apply to benefits payable for calendar 

19 months beginning after the 6-month period that begins 

20 with the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Listen

# Stephen Gilchrist

## Commissioner

Political Affiliation: RepublicanTerm Ends: November 2025

On May 7, 2020, President Trump appointed Stephen Gilchrist as a Commissioner of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. He was sworn in on May 13, 2020, and will serve until the expiration of his term on November 29, 2025.

Mr. Gilchrist is the Chairman and CEO of the South Carolina African American Chamber of Commerce where he leads a membership of over 15,000 businesses in the Carolinas focusing on the significant needs of both large and small Minority and African-American-owned businesses. He is an authority and leading voice on national public policy initiatives which include; educational reform, alternative energy sources, and financial and economic security for low-wealth communities. In addition to his many community involvement efforts, Mr. Gilchrist is a Minister of Music, Chairman of the Planning and Zoning Commission in South Carolina, and a member of the Mastercard Master Your Card Corporate Advisory Board, which seeks to address concerns of un-banked and under-banked communities in the United States. He is a former member of the Corporate Coalition, which consists of some of America’s top Fortune 500 companies, and a member of the Wal-Mart Foundation’s national effort to address hunger and food insecurities in the United States. Mr. Gilchrist is also a founding member of the International Partner Alliance (IPA) which seeks to engage international partners in advocacy work around the world.

He's a sought-after national orator whose been featured in Black Enterprise Magazine and Carolina Daily as one of the country's most influential black business leaders and has been a regular contributing guest on CNN, FOX News, and MSNBC among others.

Mr. Gilchrist attended South Carolina State University, and The Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University and is a graduate of the South Carolina Executive Institute.

-  Our Mission 
-  Commissioners 
-  Offices and Staff 
-  Careers 
-  Acquisition Opportunities 
-  Rankin Memorial Library 
-  FAQs
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Reginald Duncan, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Westchester County (Edelstein, J.), both rendered June 4, 1982, convicting him of two counts of robbery in the first degree (one count as to each indictment), upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Eiber, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 23.2****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration statement on FormS-3 (No. 333-85808), the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-130978), the Registrationstatement on Form S-8 (No. 333-75792), and the Registration statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-75788)of Access Plans of our report dated March 30, 2007, relating to the December 31, 2006 and 2005consolidated financial statements which appear in this Form 10-K./s/ HEIN & Associates LLPDallas, Texas
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the amended annual report of Capital Growth Systems,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Scott Allen, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge,
pursuant to l8 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: August 23, 2004

                                     By:  /s/ Scott Allen
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                     Name:    Scott Allen
                                     Title:   Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                              Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as an exhibit to the Report and is
not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.