alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021463EN.01001501.xml

| 16.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 463/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 463/15

---

Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)

(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1))

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 463/14)

Decision granting an authorisation

| Reference of the decision (2) | Date of decision | Substance name | Holder of the authorisation | Authorisation number | Authorised use | Date of expiry of review period | Reasons for the decision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| C(2021) 7876 | 9 November 2021 | 4-(1,1,3,3-Tetra methylbutyl)phenol, ethoxylated
  (4-tert-OPnEO)
  EC No: -, CAS No:- | Abbott Diagnostics GmbH, Max Planck Ring 2, D-65205 Delkenheim, Germany | REACH/21/10/0 | Professional use as a surfactant, in wash buffer components used in conjunction with Fluorescence In Situ Hybridisation (FISH) test kits and/or their Laboratory Developed Test (LDT) equivalents in clinical diagnostic use for medical analysis of human tissue and blood samples to identify characteristic genetic abnormalities related to specific disease conditions | 4 January 2028 | In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies. |

Reference of the decision (2)

Date of decision

Substance name

Holder of the authorisation

Authorisation number

Authorised use

Date of expiry of review period

Reasons for the decision

C(2021) 7876

9 November 2021

4-(1,1,3,3-Tetra methylbutyl)phenol, ethoxylated

(4-tert-OPnEO)

EC No: -, CAS No:-

Abbott Diagnostics GmbH, Max Planck Ring 2, D-65205 Delkenheim, Germany

REACH/21/10/0

Professional use as a surfactant, in wash buffer components used in conjunction with Fluorescence In Situ Hybridisation (FISH) test kits and/or their Laboratory Developed Test (LDT) equivalents in clinical diagnostic use for medical analysis of human tissue and blood samples to identify characteristic genetic abnormalities related to specific disease conditions

4 January 2028

In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies.

---

(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006 , p. 1.

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: Authorisation (europa.eu)

---
Order entered December 21 , 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 18 - 01297 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF M .K. AND V.G., CHILDR EN On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District C ourt

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 199 - 30160 - 2017



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s December 20, 2018 motion for extension of time to file his brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s brief due on or before January 16, 2019.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                         Consent of Independent Auditors


    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-13875, No. 333-58173, No. 333-43992), pertaining to the
Non-Plan Options, the 1996 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended, and the
Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan, as amended, of our report dated March
1, 2002 with respect to the consolidated financials statements of Hot Topic,
Inc. included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
February 2, 2002.


                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Los Angeles, California
April 29, 2002
#### Robert Kleberg v. A. J. Bonds et al.

An administrator who, in his fiduciary character, received Confederate treasury notes from a debtor of the estate, which the creditors refused to receive, was held to have made himself liable for such debt. But as he had not thereby discharged the debtors from whom he collected, the judgment of the district court was reversed and the cause remanded.

Error from De Witt. The case was tried before Hon. Wesley Ogden, one of the district judges.

The case was brought by *certiorari*from the couniy court *612to the district court. The administrator had collected sundry debts in Confederate money. He had been unable to dispose of $361 90 of this currency, and he claimed that he could have collected in nothing else, and therefore asked to be credited with it. This the county court refused, and he carried the ease to the district court. Upon motion the *certiorari*was dismissed, and the administrator prosecuted error.

*Glass*if- *Callender,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Samuel C. Lackey,*for defendant in error.

Caldwell, J.

—It hag been repeatedly ruled by this court, that Confederate money, so-called, cannot be considered a payment. True, it has in like manner been held that an executed contract will not be disturbed when Confederate money was the consideration. (Ramsom v. Alexander, Austin term, 1868, *[ante,*443].) In the case of an administrator receiving a debt due his intestate’s estate in Confederate money, and surrendering the evidence of debt, it cannot be viewed in the light of an executed contract. The debt still remains due, and may be collected by process of law, because the debtor is bound to know that an absolute payment in lawful money can only discharge a debt sounding in dollars, payable to any one acting in' a fiduciary capacity. The judgment of the district court in dismissing the *certiorari*is reversed, and the cause remanded for further procedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

Reversed and remanded.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Secure Computing Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Timothy J. Steinkopf, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Timothy J. Steinkopf                                       
|Timothy J. Steinkopf                                           
|Senior Vice President of Operations and Chief Financial Officer
|May 4, 2007
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Rawlins, Appellant.

Submitted June 4, 2007;

decided June 7, 2007

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Steven Banks, Esq., the Legal Aid Society, 199 Water Street, New York, NY 10038 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
#### D. T., Respondent, v David Axelrod, as Commissioner of Health of the State of New York, et al., Appellants.

Memorandum: While the issue presented on this appeal may have become moot, the significance of the issue and the frequency of its recurrence require that we address it in order to prevent repetition of the practice involved *(see, Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne,*50 NY2d 707). Special Term erred as a matter of law in granting a writ *1067prohibiting a scheduled administrative hearing. The courts have consistently held that a writ of prohibition should not issue to challenge a nonfinal ruling of an Administrative Hearing Officer *(see, John P. v Axelrod,*105 AD2d 1061; *Matter of Whalen v Slocum,*84 AD2d 956). “Prohibition is an extraordinary remedy to be invoked only where a clear right to relief is established and the action taken or threatened is clearly without jurisdiction or in excess of jurisdiction” *(Matter of Rainka v Whalen,*73 AD2d 731, 732, *affd*51 NY2d 973; *Matter of Bloom v Clyne,*69 AD2d 956). Here the Hearing Officer did not exceed his jurisdiction in refusing to grant an adjournment and his determination is not subject to review until after a final determination has been rendered *(see, Matter of State of New York v King,*36 NY2d 59). (Appeal from order and judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J. — art 78.) Present — Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Schnepp, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Financial Officer) pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



We, David C. Collins and Nicholas R. Schacht, certify that the periodic report, to which this Statement is attached, fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the periodic report to which this Statement is attached, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the registrant at the dates and for the periods indicated.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Statement as of the date first written below.



Dated: February 10, 2004



/s/ DAVID C. COLLINSDavid C. CollinsChief Executive Officer/s/ NICHOLAS R. SCHACHTNicholas R. SchachtPresident(Principal Financial Officer)
#### Lynda G. Kessler, Respondent, v John A. Kessler, Appellant.

Submitted March 12, 2007;

decided May 3, 2007

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF      2002**

|                                       |                                                                         |                                            |
|--------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                       | **eLINEAR,                  INC.**                                           |
|                                  |                                                                    |                                       |
| Date: April                  26, 2006 | By:                                                                | /s/ Phillip                  Michael Hardy |
|                                       | Phillip                  Michael Hardy                                       |
|                                       | Principal                  Financial and Accounting                  Officer |
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hyperion Solutions Corporation (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Godfrey R. Sullivan, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. Dated: May 10, 2005 /s/ GODFREY R. SULLIVANGodfrey R. SullivanChief Executive Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 74 (Monday, April 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 20450]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9478]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Intent To File an Application for a Subsequent License

April 11, 2000.
    a. Type of Filing: Notice of Intent to File An Application for a 
Subsequent License.
    b. Project No.: 6514.
    c. Date Filed: March 13, 2000.
    d. Submitted By: City of Marshall, Michigan--current licensee.
    e. Name of Project: City of Marshall Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: On the Kalamazoo River near the City of Marshall, in 
Calhoun County, Michigan. The project does not utilize federal lands.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Section 15 of the Federal Power Act.
    h. Licensee Contact: Thomas Tarkiewicz, City of Marshall, 323 West 
Michigan Avenue, Marshall, MI 49068, (616) 781-5183.
    i. FERC Contact: Tom Dean, [email protected], (202) 219-2778
    j. Effective date of current license: June 1, 1955.
    k. Expiration date of current license: May 31, 2005.
    l. Description of the Project: The project consists of the 
following existing facilities: (1) the 12-foot-high, 150-foot-long 
Perrin No. 1 Dam; (2) the 12-foot-high, 90-foot-long Perrin No. 2 Dam; 
(3) a 130-acre reservoir with a normal pool elevation of 899 feet msl; 
(4) a 70-foot-long canal-type forebay; (5) a powerhouse containing 
three generating units with a total installed capacity of 463 kW; and 
(6) other appurtenances.
    m. Each application for a subsequent license and any competing 
license applications must be filed with the Commission at least 24 
months prior to the expiration of the existing license. All 
applications for license for this project must be filed by May 31, 
2003.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-9478 Filed 4-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-03-2000
<CASH>                                       4,359,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,910,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,427,000
<INVENTORY>                                    371,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         504,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 295,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,555,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,871,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        39,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,602,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,055,000
<SALES>                                      8,457,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,457,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,808,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             2,035,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             324,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,290,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,716,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,574,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,574,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.65


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Paul Zitay, Appellant.

Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Patricia I. and Another, Alleged to be Children of a Mentally Ill Parent and Permanently Neglected Children. Schoharie County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Nancy I., Appellant.

Kane, J. P., Main, Yesawich, Jr., Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                       3,041,315
<SECURITIES>                                20,467,142
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,454,010
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    828,414
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            27,269,886
<PP&E>                                      14,276,852
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              41,604,730
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,121,409
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        82,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  35,107,084
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                41,604,730
<SALES>                                      7,070,074
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                        4,074,018
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,488,141
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,735,614
<INCOME-TAX>                                   553,868
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,181,746
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

Informational Addendum to Report on Form 10-Q

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Not Filed Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

The undersigned Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Geospace Technologies Corporation does hereby certify as follows:

Solely for the purpose of meeting the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and solely to the extent this
certification may be applicable to this Report on Form 10-Q/A, the undersigned hereby certifies that this Report on Form 10-Q/A fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in this Report on Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Geospace Technologies Corporation.



/s/ Thomas T. McEntireName:

Thomas T. McEntireTitle:

Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and SecretaryMay 2, 2014
2005 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

10-20-2005

In Re:Congoleum Corp

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 04-3609

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2005 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"In Re:Congoleum Corp " (2005). 2005 Decisions. Paper 290.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005/290
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-3609

 

IN RE: CONGOLEUM CORP., ET AL.,

CENTURY INDEMNITY COMPANY, AS SUCCESSOR TO CCI INSURANCE

COMPANY, AS SUCCESSOR TO INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH

AMERICAN; ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY f/k/a CIGNA

INSURANCE COMPANY; ACE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE

COMPANY f/k/a CIGNA PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Appellants

vs.

CONGOLEUM CORPORATION; CONGOLEUM SALES, INC.; 

CONGOLEUM FISCAL, INC. 

Appellees

____________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

(D.C. Civ. No. 04-cv-01709) 

District Judge: Honorable Stanley R. Chesler

____________

Argued July 15, 2005

Before: SLOVITER, McKEE and WEIS, Circuit Judges.

Filed October 13, 2005

____________

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

____________

AND NOW THIS 20 day of October, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that th

the caption on the Opinion in the above entitled case be amended to reflect counsel’s

appearances as follows: 
2

Tancred V. Schiavoni, Esquire (ARGUED)

Jonathan J. Kim, Esquire

O’Melveny & Myers LLP

7 Times Square

Times Square Tower

New York, New York 10036

Marty F. Siegal, Esquire

Siegal & Napierkowski

220 Lake Drive East

Cherry Hill, New Jersey 08002

Leonard P. Goldberger, Esquire

White & Williams LLP

1800 One Liberty Place

Philadelphia, PA 19103

Attorneys for Appellants Century Indemnity Company; Ace American Insurance

Company; Ace Property & Casualty Insurance Company

Kerry A. Brennan, Esquire (ARGUED)

Richard L. Epling, Esquire

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

1540 Broadway

New York, New York 10036

Paul S. Hollander, Esquire

Okin Hollander & DeLuca, LLP

One Parker Plaza

12 Floor th

Fort Lee, NJ 07024

Attorneys for Appellees Congoleum Corporation, Congoleum Sales, Inc., Congoleum

Fiscal, Inc.
3

Richard W. Hill, Esquire (ARGUED)

Rachel L. Diehl, Esquire

Kevin J. Licciardi, Esquire

McCarter & English, LLP

Four Gateway Center

100 Mulberry Street

Newark, New Jersey 07102

Attorneys for Gilbert Heintz & Randolph, LLP

BY THE COURT,

/s/ Joseph F. Weis, Jr. 

United States Circuit Judge

DATED: October 20, 2005

DMM/cc: Richard L. Epling, Esq.

 Kerry A. Brennan, Esq.

 Paul S. Hollander, Esq.

 Tancred V. Schiavoni, Esq.

 Richard W. Hill, Esq.