alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Listen

# Pennsylvania Advisory Committee Public Briefings on Civil Rights and the Rising Use of Artificial Intelligence in Education

The Pennsylvania Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights is conducting a study to examine the civil rights impact of the rising use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education. In this ongoing study, the Committee will consider how AI algorithms are developed, and the impact they can have on either reducing or exacerbating existing disparities (or creating new disparities) in the classroom based on federally protected classes. The Committee will also examine potential solutions and recommendations to remediate identified concerns.

The Committee will hear testimony through a series of public briefings, as follows:

**Panel I: Monday March 25, 2024, from 11:00am-1:00pm ET****Panel II: Wednesday March 27, 2024, from 11:00am-1:00pm ET****Panel III: Friday March 29, 2024, from 11:00am-1:00pm ET****Panel IV: Thursday April 25, 2024, from 11:00am-1:00pm ET**

Registration is available at: https://shorturl.at/lBE17.

All meetings are free and open to the public. Members of the public will be invited to speak during an open-comment period near the end of each meeting. The Committee also invites written testimony from others who wish to contribute. All written testimony must be submitted to the Committee by Wednesday May 1, 2024, via email at mwojnaroski@usccr.gov.

Closed captions will be provided. Individuals requiring other accommodations should contact the regional program unit at (202) 618-4158 five business days prior to the meeting to make their request. Committee Steve Irwin said, "Pennsylvania is at the center as our country begins to harness the power of AI. Our Committee has chosen to focus on identifying the risks and rewards for students from Kindergarten through High School. At the same time, its benefits must be felt equitably and its dangers must not be at the expense of the most vulnerable."

The Committee will issue its findings and recommendations in a report to the Commission after all testimony has been received, anticipated Fall 2024.

Monday, March 25, 2024 - 11:00 AM

Press Release

Pennsylvania

-  Event Calendar 
-  Public Briefings 
-  Commission Business Meetings 
-  Advisory Committees Meetings 
-  Archives
# C_2021005EN.01000801.xml

| 7.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 5/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 5/8

---

Initiation of proceedings

(Case M.9829 — Aon/Willis Towers Watson)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 5/08)

On 21 December 2020, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the above-mentioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the internal market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration, and is without prejudice to the final decision on the case. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference No. M.9829 — Aon/Willis Towers Watson, to the following address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ’Merger Regulation’).

---
EXHIBIT 32

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Millennium Quest, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
we, Dimitri Cocorinis and Terry Cononelos, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

    (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.


Dated: April 9, 2004        /s/ Dimitri Cocorinis
                            Dimitri Cocorinis, Chief Executive Officer


Dated: April 9, 2004        /s/ Terry Cononelos
                            Terry Cononelos, Chief Financial Officer
# C_2021486EN.01002801.xml

| 3.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 486/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 486/28

---

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Repeal of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 486/08)

| Member State | Italy |
| --- | --- |
| Routes concerned | Comiso-Roma Fiumicino and viceversa
  Comiso-Milano Linate and viceversa
  (the imposition of the Public Service Obligation on the routes Comiso-Milano Malpensa and vice versa and Comiso-Bergamo Orio al Serio and vice versa has expired) |
| Original date of entry into force of the public service obligations | OJ C 69 of 3.3.2020


  OJ C 204 of 18.6.2020 |
| Date of repeal | 18 October 2021 |
| Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained | Ministry of Sustainable Infrastructures and Mobility
  Department of Sustainable Mobility





  Directorate-General for Airports, Air Transport and Satellite Services |
| Via Giuseppe Caraci, 36 |
| 00157 Roma |
| ITALIA |

Member State

Italy

Routes concerned

Comiso-Roma Fiumicino and viceversa

Comiso-Milano Linate and viceversa

(the imposition of the Public Service Obligation on the routes Comiso-Milano Malpensa and vice versa and Comiso-Bergamo Orio al Serio and vice versa has expired)

Original date of entry into force of the public service obligations

OJ C 69 of 3.3.2020

OJ C 204 of 18.6.2020

Date of repeal

18 October 2021

Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained

Ministry of Sustainable Infrastructures and Mobility

Department of Sustainable Mobility

Directorate-General for Airports, Air Transport and Satellite Services

Via Giuseppe Caraci, 36

00157 Roma

ITALIA

Tel. +39 0644127190

Email: dg.ta@pec.mit.gov.it

Internet: http://www.mit.gov.it

---
#### James M. McIlroy, as Executor of Brenda W. McIlroy, Deceased, Appellant, v Patricia A. McIlroy et al., Defendants, and Town of Covington et al., Respondents.

Present — Dillon, P. J., Green, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
EX-4.4





 Exhibit 4.4 
  





 
 ADDENDUM No. 1 TO AGREEMENT DATED 30th
March, 2016 
 This addendum No. 1 (“Addendum”) is made and executed on this
15th day of February 2021, by and between Tata Motors Limited (“Tata Motors”), having its registered office address at Bombay House, 24 Homi Mody Street, Fort, Mumbai - 400 001,
and Mr. Guenter Butschek, aged 60 years, son of Mr. Josef Butschek, citizen of Germany, holding valid Passport No C4JKKF81Z and valid Director Identification Number 07427375 currently residing at at Flat no. 801, 8th Floor, Urmi Aangan, 13 A Peddar Road, Mumbai 400026. 
 WHEREAS Tata Motors and Mr. Guenter Butschek
have executed an Agreement dated 30th March, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as “Principal Agreement”) for appointing Mr. Guenter Butschek as the Chief Executive Officer and
Managing Director of Tata Motors on such terms and conditions mentioned in the Principal Agreement. 












 AND WHEREAS the appointment of Mr. Guenter Butschek as the Chief Executive Officer and Managing
Director of Tata Motors is scheduled to end as on 14th February 2021. 
 AND WHEREAS Tata Motors has decided to extend Mr. Guenter Butschek’s term
as Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director from 15th February, 2021 to 30th June, 2021 (“Appointment Term”). 

AND WHEREAS the parties hereto are desirous of entering into this Addendum to the Principal Agreement, being these presents, to record the aforesaid
understanding. 
 NOW IT IS HEREBY AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES AS FOLLOWS: 

 

	 	1.	 Clause 2.1 of the Principal Agreement stands replaced as under: 



Subject as hereinafter provided, this Addendum shall remain in force for the Appointment Term after which it shall automatically expire, unless
terminated earlier. 
  

	 	2.	 Clause 2.2 of the Principal Agreement titled “Term and Termination” shall stand deleted in its
entirety. 


  

	 	3.	 Save and except as aforesaid, all other terms and conditions specified in the Principal Agreement shall
continue to be in full force and effect and deemed to be incorporated by reference in this Addendum. This Addendum shall always be read and referred in conjunction with Principal Agreement and not in isolation. The Principal Agreement along with the
Addendum shall constitute the entire agreement between the parties. 


 IN WITNESS WHEREOF Tata Motors and Mr. Guenter Butschek
hereto have read and understood this Addendum and executed this Addendum on this day and first written above. 
  

					
	Signed on behalf of Tata Motors Limited by	  		  	Signed, Sealed and Delivered
	Ravindra Kumar GP	  		  	By Mr. Guenter Butschek
	President and CHRO	  		  	
			
	 /s/ Ravindra Kumar GP
	  		  	 /s/ Guenter Butschek
Listen

# Minnesota Advisory Committee Public Web Briefing on Equal Access to Housing Opportunities - Panel I

The Minnesota Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights is hosting a series of online public panel briefings to hear testimony regarding the potential civil rights concerns related to housing affordability.

The purpose of these briefings is to examine the efficacy of the 2020-2023 Strategic Plan created by Minnesota Housing, the state’s housing finance agency. 

Thursday, November 9, 2023 - 2:00 PM

Press Release

Minnesota

-  Event Calendar 
-  Public Briefings 
-  Commission Business Meetings 
-  Advisory Committees Meetings 
-  Archives
# C_2021222EN.01002201.xml

| 11.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/22

---

Notice for the attention of certain persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

(2021/C 222/03)

The following information is brought to the attention of Mr. Denis Valentinovich BEREZOVSKIY (no. 4), Mr. Sergei Vladimirovich ZHELEZNYAK (no. 17), Mr. Sergei Ivanovich MENYAILO (no. 37), Mr. Vladimir Nikolaevich PLIGIN (no. 51), Mr. Oleg Grigorievich KOZYURA (no. 53), Mr. Roman Viktorovich LYAGIN (no. 58), Mr. Mikhail Vladimirovich DEGTYARYOV (no. 79), Mr. Fyodor Dmitrievich BEREZIN (no. 84), Mr. Vladimir Abdualiyevich VASILYEV (no. 108), Mr. Vladimir Stepanovich NIKITIN (no. 111), Mr. Alexander Mikhailovich BABAKOV (no. 119), Mr. Oleg Konstantinovich AKIMOV (no. 121), Mr. Ihor Vladymyrovych KOSTENOK (no. 130), Mr. Yevgeniy Vyacheslavovich ORLOV (no. 131), Mr. Eduard Aleksandrovich BASURIN (no. 137), Mr. Alexandr Vasilievich SHUBIN (no. 138), Mr. Andrey Vladimirovich CHEREZOV (no. 158) and Mr. Aleksandr Yurevich PETUKHOV (no. 164), persons appearing in the Annex to Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP (1) and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 (2) concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.

The Council is considering maintaining the restrictive measures against the above-mentioned persons with new statements of reasons. Those persons are hereby informed that they may submit a request to the Council to obtain the intended statements of reasons for their designation, before 24 June 2021, to the following address:

Council of the European Union

| General Secretariat |
| --- |
| RELEX.1.C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

General Secretariat

RELEX.1.C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

---

(1)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 16.

(2)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 6.

---
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Robert W. COSGROVE, Corporal, U.S. Marine Corps, Appellant.

No. 30,710.

U. S. Court of Military Appeals.

Oct. 24, 1975.

*Lieutenant Michael C. Barr,*JAGC, USNR, was on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel P. N. Kress,*USMC, and *Lieutenant John H. Poag,*JAGC, USNR, were on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

The accused was convicted by general court-martial on his guilty pleas of two specifications of attempting to violate a general order in violation of Article 80, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 880. We granted review to determine whether the accused’s sentence was adjudged by an impartial court.

During voir dire examination, a member of the court, Lieutenant Colonel Jacobsen, expressed his views relative to determining an appropriate sentence, in part, as follows:

> Q. [DEFENSE COUNSEL]. Do you feel that in any ease involving LSD, use, sale or transfer in the military, that a punitive discharge should be awarded?

> MEM: (LTCOL JACOBSEN): If the person is found guilty, I think so, yes.

> Q. If we present no facts in mitigation of an attempted sale, would your feeling be that some sort of punitive discharge is indicated?

> MEM: If the plea was guilty with no mitigating circumstances, I would . *200I would have to say yes, a punitive discharge would be appropriate.

Thereafter, the defense challenge for cause against Lieutenant Colonel Jacobsen was denied. The responses of the member in the present case, however, clearly reflected an inelastic attitude toward the imposition of a punitive discharge which was based solely on the nature of the crime. *United States v. Cleveland,*15 U.S.C.M.A. 213, 35 C.M.R. 185 (1965). As such, the challenge ought to have been granted.

The decision of the U.S. Navy Court of Military Review as to the sentence is reversed. A rehearing on the sentence may be had.
Listen

# The Status of Civil Rights in the U.S. Virgin Islands

February 21, 2024

The U.S. Virgin Islands Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights released a report following a series of public meetings and a collection of testimony provided by expert panelists. The report explores the current political and legal status of the U.S. Virgin Islands and the inequality suffered by the U.S. Citizens who reside there. It also contains an examination of the break in the long tradition of granting statehood to territories, and the reality of 21st century colonialism in the territories.

Primary concerns identified in the report include the lack of civil rights protections based on the selective application of the Constitution by a Congress that does not have to answer to the U.S. Citizens living in the Territories, who have no voting representation in the House of Representatives and no representation in the Senate. These U.S. Citizens lack the right to vote in the Presidential election, are denied access to critical government assistance programs, and even military veterans living in the Islands suffer from a lack of adequate healthcare by an under-funded Veterans Administration system.

Report

Press Release

U.S. Virgin Islands

-  All Reports 
-  Annual Statutory Enforcement 
-  Briefing Reports 
-  Advisory Committees Reports 
-  Budget and Performance 
-  FOIA Reports 
-  Data Inventory Program 
-  Civil Rights Complaints 
-  Historical Publications 
-  Archives
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-20703 and No. 333-32945), pertaining to the 1993 Incentive
Stock Plan of SoloPoint.com, Inc., of our report dated February 15, 2000, with
respect to the financial statements of SoloPoint.com, Inc., included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended December 31, 1999.



                                  /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Palo Alto, California
March 30, 2000
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                                     <C>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1997                DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                          APR-01-1997                JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1997                JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                        2,095                      2,095
<SECURITIES>                                  3,754                      3,754
<RECEIVABLES>                                 2,390                      2,390
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (4)                        (4)
<INVENTORY>                                   2,312                      2,312
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             10,642                     10,642
<PP&E>                                        7,598                      7,598
<DEPRECIATION>                               (3,199)                    (3,199)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               16,850                     16,850
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           554                        554
<BONDS>                                           0                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0                          0
<PREFERRED>                                       0                          0
<COMMON>                                          7                          7
<OTHER-SE>                                   16,229                     16,229
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 16,850                     16,850
<SALES>                                       1,759                      4,043
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              1,759                      4,043
<CGS>                                         1,427                      2,950
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 1,427                      2,950
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (1,980)                    (3,559)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0                         (1)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (933)                    (1,396)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (14)                       (29)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0                          0
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0                          0
<CHANGES>                                         0                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (948)                    (1,425)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (0.14)                     (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (0.14)                     (0.21) 
        

</TABLE>
I DRANK, BUT I DIDN’T DRIVE 

Written by: CDR Evan Hudspeth

Particularly during the holiday season, many have heard the 

warnings about not drinking alcohol and driving a vehicle. Hopefully 

it makes sense that this warning is also applicable to drinking 

alcohol and operating a vessel. In order to establish that a boating 

under the influence (BUI) violation has occurred, evidence should 

indicate that not only was the subject under the influence, but also 

that the subject was operating a vessel. Sometimes a recreational

boater will respond to the BUI allegation admitting the first element 

(being under the influence), but disputing the second (operating a 

vessel). These arguments often fail to focus on the significant issues 

because the boater does not have a good understanding of Title 33, 

Code of Federal Regulations, Part 95 (33 CFR § 95.001 and 

following), which sets forth the regulatory framework by which a 

person is determined to be operating a vessel under the influence. 

First, a few definitions are necessary in order to fully understand the 

terms the Hearing Officer will consider when deciding if a violation 

has occurred. According to 33 CFR § 95.010, a “Vessel includes every 

description of watercraft or other artificial contrivance used, or 

capable of being used, as a means of transportation on water.” So it 

is quite likely that, besides a motorboat, a sailboat, a rowboat, or a 

raft could also be considered a vessel. Additionally, “Underway

means that a vessel is not at anchor, or made fast to the shore, or 

aground.” So even if a vessel is drifting, it is still considered 

underway. 

If the boater was on a vessel, and the vessel was underway, as those 

terms are defined by the regulations, the Hearing Officer will next 

determine whether or not the boater was operating the vessel. 

According to 33 CFR § 95.015, “... an individual is considered to be 

operating a vessel when... The individual has an essential role in the 
operation of a recreational vessel underway, including but not 

limited to navigation of the vessel or control of the vessel’s 

propulsion system.” 

Although some examples are given, the term “an essential role” is 

not defined. Therefore evidence that describes the specific 

circumstances must be considered to determine operation of the 

vessel. Simply having a “designated driver” at the controls does not 

exclude another from also operating the vessel. If physical actions 

(handling the oars, sails, throttle, rudder, tiller, or helm) or verbal 

directions (where to go, or how to operate) are involved, then the 

charged boater can be considered to have had “an essential role” in 

the operation of the vessel. Other considerations (when provided) 

include the purported operator’s (and/or charged boater’s) age, 

experience level, and familiarity with the area. 

So, before alleging a violation, or disputing a BUI charge, consider 

the applicable regulations discussed above, and ensure your evidence 

or arguments are focused on the matters that will really tend to 

prove or dispute the alleged violation.
#### PROCTOR, Respondent, v. SIDNEY SASH, BLIND & FURNITURE CO. et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

December 18, 1896.)

Action by William H. Proctor against the Sidney Sash, Blind & Furniture Company and others.

No opinion. Motion to go to the court of appeals, and for a certificate from this court under section 190 of the Code, denied. See 40 N. Y. Supp. 454.