alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 21**

**LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES**

Capital Growth Systems, Inc., a Floridacorporation (operating) 

20/20 Technologies, Inc, a Delaware corporation (operating) 

20/20 Technologies I, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company 

Magenta netLogic Limited UK, a United Kingdom corporation (operating) 

CentrePath, Inc., a Delaware corporation (operating) 

Global Capacity Group, Inc., a Texas corporation (operating) 

Capital Growth Acquisition, Inc., a Delaware corporation 

Global Capacity Direct, LLC, (GCD), a Delaware limited liability company, formerly known as Vanco Direct USA, LLC (operating) 

Nexvu Technologies, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (discontinued) 

FNS 2007, Inc., a Delaware corporation (discontinued)
**Exhibit10.7**

 

**SECONDAMENDMENT TO SECURITIES PURCHASE AGREEMENT**

 

This Second Amendmentdated August 6, 2009, amends the Securities Purchase Agreement (the “**Agreement**”) dated as of May 13, 2009, as amended, byand between XShares Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “**Company**”), and MGT Capital Investments, Inc.,a Delaware corporation, (the “**Purchaser**”).

 

WHEREAS, the partiesdesire to again amend certain terms and conditions of the Agreement.

 

Purchaser and Company agreeas follows.

 

1.               Term.  The term ofthis Amendment commences on the date set forth above and continues in effectcoterminous with the term of the Agreement.

 

2.               Defined Terms. Except as defined herein, all defined terms used inthis Amendment have the meaning set forth in the Agreement.

 

3.               Issuance of the Second Note. Subsection 1.1 of theAgreement is hereby as follows:.

 

“1.1.        Issuance of Two Convertible PromissoryNotes.

 

(a)               The Board of Directors has dulyapproved the issuance of the Convertible Promissory Note (the “**Original Note**”),in the original principal amount of $1,100,000, made by the Company in favor ofthe Purchaser in the form annexed hereto as Exhibit A-1. The Board ofDirectors has also duly approved the issuance of the second ConvertiblePromissory Note (the “**Second Note**”), in the original principalamount of $1,000,000, made by the Company in favor of the Purchaser in the formannexed hereto as Exhibit A-2.

 

(b)               Subject to the terms andconditions of this Agreement, the Purchaser agrees to purchase the OriginalNote immediately upon execution of this Agreement, and the Company agrees toexecute and deliver the Original Note to the Purchaser immediately upon receiptfrom the Purchaser of $1,000,000. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Purchaseragrees to purchase the Second Note immediately upon execution of the SecondAmendment to this Agreement, and the Company agrees to execute and deliver theSecond Note to the Purchaser immediately upon receipt from the Purchaser of$1,000,000.

 

4.               Entire Agreement.  Except asamended herein, all terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in fullforce and effect.

 

This Second Amendment isincorporated in its entirety in the Agreement and both this Amendment and the Agreementshall be read and interpreted together collectively as the “Agreement.”

 

**INWITNESS WHEREOF**,the parties have caused this Amendment to be duly executed by their respectiveauthorized representatives.

 

 
| XSHARES GROUP, INC. | MGT CAPITAL  INVESTMENTS, INC. |
|---------------------|--------------------------------|
|                |                           |   |   |   |
|                |                           |   |   |   |
| By:                 | /s/ Jeffrey Feldman            |   | By: | /s/ Tim Paterson-Brown |
| Its:                | Chief Executive Officer        |   | Its: | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
# C_2021383EN.01000101.xml

| 21.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 383/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 383/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10406 - CD&R/MCC Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 383/01)

On 10 September 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10406. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10406. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Intevac, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ KEVIN FAIRBAIRN

Kevin FairbairnPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Director
EXHIBIT 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of American  Southwest  Holdings,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  September  30, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission (the Report),  I, Alan Doyle,
President (Chief Executive Officer) and Treasurer  (Principal Financial Officer)
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the report fully complies
with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:  November 11, 2004



/s/ Alan Doyle
---------------------------------------
Alan Doyle
President (Chief Executive Officer) and
Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-20028

Summary Calendar

 

AUTRY LEE JONES,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS

DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-94-CV-1111

- - - - - - - - - -

June 9, 1998

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Autry Lee Jones, federal prisoner # 52873-080-CB-110,

requests that this court issue a certificate of appealability

(COA) so that he may appeal the district court’s denial of his

petition for writ of error coram nobis. Jones wishes to

challenge a 1963 Texas conviction for which he is no longer in

custody. 
No. 98-20028

-2-

Jones may not seek in federal court the relief that he

requests because it falls outside the ambit of both coram nobis

and habeas corpus. See United States v. Dyer, 136 F.3d 417, 422

(5th Cir. 1998); Cavett v. Ellis, 578 F.2d 567, 569 n. 4 (5th

Cir. 1978). Accordingly, COA is DENIED. 

Jones’ appeal is without arguable merit and is frivolous. 

See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). 

Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir.

R. 42.2. 

Jones’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. 

COA DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; IFP DENIED.
1

The Honorable Thomas C. Mummert, United States Magistrate Judge for the

Eastern District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by

consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 07-2376

___________

William G. Carter, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Eastern District of Missouri.

*

Alan Blake, C.O.O., MSOTC; Janine * [UNPUBLISHED]

Semar, Recreation Director, MSOTC, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: May 8, 2008

Filed: May 13, 2008

___________

Before BYE, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

William Carter appeals the district court’s1

 denial of his motion for postjudgment relief in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
CARLSBAD MAIN CANAL AT HEAD NEAR CARLSBAD, NMLatitude: 32.49Longitude: -104.253Elevation: 3137

CARLSBAD MAIN CANAL AT HEAD NEAR CARLSBAD, NM

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Sierra Blanca Site Page...



Sierra Blanca

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Adams Ranch #1 Site Page...



Adams Ranch #1

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Wesner Springs Site Page...



Wesner Springs

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Elk Cabin Site Page...



Elk Cabin

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Santa Fe Site Page...



Santa Fe
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 21063]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9729]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice #3277]


Shipping Coordinating Committee Maritime Safety Committee; Notice 
of Meeting

    The Shipping Coordinating Committee will conduct an open meeting at 
9:30 a.m. on Thursday, May 11, 2000, in Room 2415, at U.S. Coast Guard 
Headquarters, 2100 2nd Street, SW, Washington, DC. The purpose of this 
meeting will be to finalize preparations for the 72nd Session of the 
Maritime Safety Committee, and associated bodies of the International 
Maritime Organization (IMO), which is scheduled for May 17-26, 2000, at 
IMO Headquarters in London. At this meeting, papers received and the 
draft U.S. positions will be discussed.
    Among other things, the items of particular interest are:
    a. Bulk carrier safety;
    b. Role of the human element;
    c. Formal safety assessment;
    d. Piracy and armed robbery against ships;
    e. Reports of seven subcommittees--Training and watchkeeping; Flag 
State implementation; Bulk liquids and gases; Radiocommunications and 
search and rescue; Safety of navigation; Dangerous goods, solid cargoes 
and containers; Fire protection; and, Ship design and equipment;
    Members of the public may attend this meeting up to the seating 
capacity of the room. Interested persons may seek information by 
writing to Mr. Joseph J. Angelo, Commandant (G-MS), U.S. Coast Guard, 
2100 2nd Street, SW, Room 1218, Washington, DC 20593-0001 or by calling 
(202) 267-2970.

    Dated: April 6, 2000
Stephen M. Miller,
Executive Secretary, Shipping Coordinating Committee, U.S. Department 
of State.
[FR Doc. 00-9729 Filed 4-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-17-U
# C_2021064EN.01000201.xml

| 24.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10086 — Cerberus Group/Dorel Industries)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 64/02)

On 03 February 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10086. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10086. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 74 (Monday, April 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 20431]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9400]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Minnesota Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the Minnesota Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 12 
p.m. and adjourn at 4 p.m. on Tuesday, May 9, 2000, at the Embassy 
Suites, 425 South Seventh Street, Minneapolis, Minnesota 54415. The 
purpose of the meeting is to review the Committee's report, ``Civil 
Rights Issues Facing Minorities in Moorhead, Minnesota,'' and plan 
future activities.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Committee Chairperson Alan W. 
Weinblatt, 612-292-8770, or Constance M. Davis, Director of the 
Midwestern Regional Office, 312-353-8311 (TDD 312-353-8362). Hearing-
impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services 
of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at 
least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, April 7, 2000.
Lisa M. Kelly,
Special Assistant to the Staff Director, Regional Programs Coordination 
Unit.
[FR Doc. 00-9400 Filed 4-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FREDERICK LOUIS WARD,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

GEMMA GREENE WALDRON; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 10-17685

D.C. No. 3:10-cv-00306-LRHRAM

MEMORANDUM*

FREDERICK LOUIS WARD,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

GOMEZ; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 11-15476

D.C. No. 3:09-cv-00007-RCJ-VPC

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Larry R. Hicks, District Judge, Presiding

Robert C. Jones, Chief Judge, Presiding

FILED

JUL 12 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
The panel unanimously concludes these appeals are suitable for **

decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

2 10-17685

Submitted June 26, 2012** 

Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated appeals, Frederick Louis Ward appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgments dismissing his actions arising out of alleged excessive

force and denial of adequate medical care. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291. We review de novo. Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000)

(dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A); Knievel v. ESPN, 393 F.3d 1068, 1072 (9th

Cir. 2005) (dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed the claims against Waldron and the

City of Spark defendants because Ward failed to allege facts sufficient to show that

defendants conspired to violate Ward’s constitutional rights or that Waldron was

acting under color of state law. See Olsen v. Idaho State Bd. of Med., 363 F.3d

916, 929 (9th Cir. 2004) (“To state a claim for conspiracy to violate constitutional

rights, the plaintiff must state specific facts to support the existence of the claimed

conspiracy.” (citation and internal quotations omitted)); Simmons v. Sacramento

Cnty. Super. Ct., 318 F.3d 1156, 1161 (9th Cir. 2003) (conclusory allegations that

attorney was conspiring with state officers are insufficient to support a § 1983
3 10-17685

claim).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by granting defendants’ motion

to strike documents Ward personally filed while he was still represented by

counsel. See Hambleton Bros. Lumber Co. v. Balkin Enters. Inc., 397 F.3d 1217,

1224 n.4 (9th Cir. 2005) (stating standard of review). 

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief, nor arguments and allegations raised for the first time on

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009) (per curiam).

Ward’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

All pending motions are denied.

AFFIRMED.
# Fourth C ourt of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 6, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00486

- CR

Robert ROMERO

, Appellant

v.

STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 6, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 562296 Honorable Wayne A. Christian, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On August 1, 2018, we ordered Appellant Robert Romero to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed, explaining that the trial court had signed a certification of defendant’s right to appeal stating that this “is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendan t has NO right of appeal.” See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(a)(2). On August 31, 2018, a supplement clerk’s record was filed containing a corrected certification of defendant’s right to appeal signed by the trial court.

The trial court has certified that the defen dant has the right to appeal. We therefore REINSTATE this appeal on the docket of the court.

The clerk’s and reporter’s records have been filed. Thus, we ORDER appellant to file his

brief on or before October 8, 2018

.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 6th day of September, 2018

.___________________________________ K eith E. H ottle

Clerk of Court
#### In the Matter of Delore Fuentes, Petitioner, v Harold J. Smith, as Superintendent of Attica Correctional Facility, Respondent.

— Determination unanimously annulled on the law and petition granted *(see, Matter of Lahey v Kelly,*125 AD2d 923, *Iv granted*69 NY2d 608). (Article 78 proceeding transferred by order of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Green, Pine and Lawton, JJ.
NUMBERS 13-21-00470-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG 

 

KENNETH LEE CHAVEZ, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 93rd District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before Justices Longoria, Hinojosa, and Silva

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on its own motion. On December 20, 2021, appellant 

attempted to perfect an appeal by filing a pro se notice of appeal. It is unclear which, if 

any, final judgment the appellant is attempting to appeal. On January 11, 2022, the Clerk 

of the Court sent appellant’s counsel notice that it appears there is no final, appealable 

judgment. Appellant’s counsel did not respond to the notice and the defect has not been
2

cured.

This sequence of events requires us to effectuate our responsibility to avoid further 

delay and to preserve the parties' rights. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3 and 44.4. Accordingly, 

this appeal is abated and the cause remanded to the trial court. Upon remand, the trial 

court shall utilize whatever means necessary to make appropriate findings and 

recommendations concerning the following: (1) whether appellant wishes to pursue his 

appeal; (2) which final judgment or other order appellant is attempting to appeal; (3) 

whether appellant has effectively abandoned the appeal; (4) if counsel has abandoned 

the representation of appellant; (5) whether appellant’s rights are adversely affected by a 

continued delay; (6) whether new counsel should be appointed; and (7) if any other orders 

are necessary to ensure the proper and timely pursuit of appellant’s appeal.

The trial court shall cause its finding and recommendations, together with any 

orders it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues, to be included in a supplemental 

clerk's record. Furthermore, the trial court shall cause a supplemental reporter's record of 

any proceedings to be prepared. The supplemental clerk's record and supplemental 

reporter's record, if any, shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court within thirty days from 

the date of this order.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed on the

15th day of March, 2022.
Exhibit 32




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION


906 OF THE SARBAENES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Mass Megawatts Wind Power, Inc. (the 'Company') on Form 10-KSB for the year ended April 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the 'Report'), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to such officer's knowledge: Section 13(a)





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of Section 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934: and




(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.




In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.




Mass Megawatts Wind Power, Inc.Date: July 29,   2011
By:
/s/Jonathan RickerJonathan RickerTitle: Chairman, Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer