alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.2





STONERIDGE, INC.


LONG-TERM CASH INCENTIVE PLAN


2011 ADDENDUM TO


2010 PHANTOM SHARE GRANT AGREEMENT


DATED FEBRUARY 14, 2010




Grantee
_____________Maximum Number of Phantom Shares that May Vest for 2011 Performance Period
_______





Maximum Number of 2011 Phantom Shares that May Vest:




If EPS for the 2011 calendar year equals or exceeds $0.93 (the “2011 Maximum Threshold’), then all _____ Phantom Shares shall vest conditionally, contingent upon Grantee’s continued employment with the Company through the Vesting Date.




If EPS for the 2011 calendar year exceeds $0.72 (the “2011 Target Threshold”), but is less than the 2011 Maximum Threshold, then the number of Phantom Shares that shall vest shall be _____ Phantom Shares plus the result of the following calculation: _____ times (the difference between the Company’s aggregate EPS for 2011 and the 2011 Target Threshold) divided by (the difference between the 2011 Maximum Threshold and the 2011 Target Threshold).  Such vesting shall be conditional, contingent upon Grantee’s continued employment with the Company through the Vesting Date.  The remaining 2011 Phantom Shares shall be forfeited on February 14, 2013, unless otherwise vested under Section 5 of the 2010 Phantom Shares Grant Agreement (the “2010 Agreement”).




If EPS for the 2011 calendar year equals the 2011 Target Threshold, then the number of Phantom Shares that shall vest shall be _____ Phantom Shares.  Such vesting shall be conditional, contingent upon Grantee’s continued employment with the Company through the Vesting Date.  The remaining 2011 Phantom Shares that shall be forfeited on February 14, 2013, unless otherwise vested under Section 5 of the 2010 Agreement.




If EPS for the 2011 calendar year exceeds $0.50 (the “2011 Minimum Threshold”), but is less than the 2011 Target Threshold, then the number of Phantom Shares that shall vest shall be _____ Phantom Shares plus the result of the following calculation: _____times (the difference between the Company’s aggregate EPS for 2011 and the 2011 Minimum Threshold) divided by (the difference between the 2011 Target Threshold and the 2011 Minimum Threshold).  Such vesting shall be conditional, contingent upon Grantee’s continued employment with the Company through the Vesting Date.  The remaining 2011 Phantom Shares shall be forfeited on February 14, 2013, unless otherwise vested under Section 5 of the 2010 Agreement.




If EPS for the 2011 calendar year equals the 2011 Minimum Threshold, then the number of Phantom Shares that shall vest shall be _____ Phantom Shares.  Such vesting shall be conditional, contingent upon Grantee’s continued employment with the Company through the Vesting Date.  The remaining 2011 Phantom Shares shall be forfeited on February 14, 2013, unless otherwise vested under Section 5 of the 2010 Agreement.




If EPS for the 2011 calendar year is less than the 2011 Minimum Threshold, then _____ Phantom Shares shall be forfeited on February 14, 2013, unless otherwise vested under Section 5 of the 2010 Agreement.




Approved by the Compensation Committee on February 14, 2011.
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                 SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Blount International, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, James S. Osterman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the report.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Blount International, Inc. and will be retained by Blount
International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.


Date: November 19, 2004


/s/ James S. Osterman
-----------------------------
James S. Osterman
President and
Chief Executive Officer
PROMISSORY NOTE


$3,526.00                                                 December 31, 2004
                                                          Newport Beach, CA


     On Demand FOR VALUE RECEIVED the undersigned promises to pay in
lawful money of the United States of America to the order of Cygni
Capital, LLC, nominee or assignee, the sum of THREE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED
TWENTY SIX DOLLARS ($3,526.00), with interest from December 31, 2004, until
paid at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum.

     Should interest not be paid, it shall thereafter bear interest as
the principal, but such unpaid interest so compounded shall not exceed
an amount equal to simple interest on the principal at the maximum
rate permitted by law.  The undersigned hereby waives presentment of
payment, protest, notice of protest, notice of nonpayment, and
diligence in bringing suit, and further agrees, in case suit is
instituted, to collect this Promissory Note or any portion thereof, to
pay such additional sum for attorneys' fees as the Court may adjudge
reasonable in such suit.


                                   CYGNI INVESTMENTS, INC.

                                   By:  /s/ Carl Suter
                                        Carl Suter, President
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of eLinear, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB/A  (Second  Amendment) for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Kevan  Casey,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  section  1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Kevan Casey
--------------------------------
Kevan Casey,
Chief Executive Officer
December 19, 2003


     A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to  eLinear,  Inc.  and  will  be  retained by eLinear, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




<PAGE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 31, 2014

s0127

Order 

Clerk

January 31, 2014

148003

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148003

COA: 310531

Oakland CC: 2011-237299-FC

MELVIN VITO DALTON,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 10, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
|------------------------------------------------
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906              

The undersigned, Wenwu Wang, the Interim Chief Financial
Officer of CHINA BAK BATTERY, INC. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY
that:

1. The Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014 (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

2. Information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operation of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement
this 27th day of January, 2015.

| | /s/
      Wenwu Wang                              
| | --------------------------------------------------
| | Wenwu Wang                                        
| | Interim Chief Financial Officer                   
| | (Principal Financial and Accounting
      Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to China BAK Battery, Inc. and will be retained by China
BAK Battery, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

---
DLD

- 104 NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________ No. 23

- 1244

___________ IN RE: MATTHEW P. DEC,

Petitioner

____________________________________ On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (Related to D.C. Civ. Nos. 2:22

- cv - 01290, 2:23

- cv - 00072)

____________________________________ Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

March 9, 2023 Before: JORDAN, SHWARTZ, and SCIRICA, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed March 20, 2023 )

_________ OPINION *

_________ PER CURIAM In September 2022, pro se petitioner Matthew P. Dec filed a civil rights lawsuit in the United States Court for the Western District of Pen nsylvania against several defendants. After all but one defendant had accepted or waived service, the District Court entered an order on December 22, 2022 staying and administratively closing the matter without prejudice pending the completion of service on all defendants. Dec then

* This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P . 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent.filed a motion on December 29, seeking to remove Butler County (the unserved party) as

a defendant. He subsequently filed a new civil rights action in January 2023 against several Butler County defendants. Dec has now filed t his petition for a writ of mandamus asking us to order the District Court to take action in his two cases. For the following reasons, we will deny the petition. A writ of mandamus is a drastic remedy that is available only in extraordinary circumstances. See In re Diet Drugs Prods. Liab. Litig. , 418 F.3d 372, 378 (3d Cir. 2005). A petitioner must ordinarily have no other means to obtain the desired relief, and he must show a clear and indisputable right to issuance of the writ. See In re Sch. Asbestos L itig. , 977 F.2d 764, 772 (3d Cir. 1992) (citing Will v. United States , 389 U.S. 90, 96 (1967)). To the extent that Dec argues that the District Court has failed to act promptly in the 2022 case or in his recently

- filed matter, he has not demonstrated a cl ear and indisputable right to relief. Although docket management is generally within the District Court’s discretion, see In re Fine Paper Antitrust Litig. , 685 F.2d 810, 817 (3d Cir. 1982), undue delay can amount to a failure to exercise jurisdiction and thus warrant mandamus relief. See Madden v. Myers , 102 F.3d 74, 79 (3d Cir. 1996). But there has been no such delay here. Case number 2:23

- cv - 00072 was not docketed until January 17, 2023, while Dec’s motion in 2:22

- cv - 01290 has only been pending since December 29, 2022. We are confident that the District Court will rule on these matters without undue delay. Accordingly, we will deny the petition for writ of mandamus.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Secure Computing Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for
the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Timothy J. Steinkopf, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Timothy J. Steinkopf                                       
|Timothy J. Steinkopf                                           
|Senior Vice President of Operations and Chief Financial Officer
|February 16, 2007
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002***

 

In connection with theamended Annual Report of GeoPetro Resources Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, StuartJ. Doshi , Chief Executive Officer, and J. Chris Steinhauser, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, tohis knowledge, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: March 31,  2010 | /s/ Stuart J. Doshi                 |
|-----------------------------|-------------------------------------|
|                        | Stuart J. Doshi                     |
|                        | President, Chief  Executive Officer |
|                        | and Chairman of the  Board          |
|                        |                                |
| Dated: March 31,  2010 | /s/ J. Chris  Steinhauser           |
|                        | J. Chris Steinhauser                |
|                        | Chief Financial Officer             |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to GeoPetroResources Company and will be retained by GeoPetro Resources Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----

*                 This certification is being furnishedsolely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and isnot being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filingof the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of anygeneral incorporation language in such filing.

 

----
# C_2021383EN.01000401.xml

| 21.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 383/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 383/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10331 — Caisse des dépôts/Bain Capital/Digital Aftermarket)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 383/04)

On 27 July 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10331. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10331. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
---

---

Exhibit 14.1

# Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-12904) pertaining to the
Employees Share Purchase Plan and the Share Incentive Plan of Tikcro Technologies
Ltd. of our report dated June 29, 2009, with respect to the financial statements of Tikcro
Technologies Ltd. included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December
31, 2008.

|June 29, 2009Tel-Aviv, Israel |  | /s/ KOST, FORER GABBAY & KASIERER
KOST, FORER GABBAY & KASIERER     A Member of Ernst & Young Global
|----------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Secure Computing Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John E. McNulty, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

 

/s/ John E. McNulty

 

John E. McNulty 

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 

July 31, 2003
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, James K. Hilger, Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of Pyramid
Breweries Inc. ("registrant"), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the registrant;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and we have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within the
      entity, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors:

      a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      controls over financial reporting.

Date: November 15, 2004

/s/ JAMES K. HILGER
----------------------------------

James K. Hilger
Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2021459EN.01004101.xml

| 12.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 459/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 459/41

---

FUSION FOR ENERGY JOINT UNDERTAKING

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2020

(2021/C 459/41)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://fusionforenergy.europa.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/F4E_2020_Final-Accounts_Final.pdf

---
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the annual report of Trycera Financial (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned principal executive and
financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)


the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)


the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
 April 15, 2009








/s/ Bryan Kenyon


Bryan
Kenyon, Chief Financial Officer


(Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### PEOPLE v. ROBBINS.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June, 1896.)

Proceeding against Darius Robbins.

No opinion. Motion granted, with $10 costs.