alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MEADOWCRAFT, INC. FOR THE QUARTER ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1997
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,976
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     28,119
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,547
<PP&E>                                          69,626
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,126
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  86,221
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,842
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           160
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,130
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    30,290
<SALES>                                          6,916
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,916
<CGS>                                            6,748
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,748
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,532
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                (2,364)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 491
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,855)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,062)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,793)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,793)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

Complainant

vs.

WILLIAM DANIEL KRAVIS

Respondent

Docket Number 2023-0199

Enforcement Activity No. 7684499

CONSENT ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

On June 12, 2023, the parties in this case submitted a Motion for Approval of a 

Settlement Agreement and Entry of Consent Order to be approved as a settlement of the case 

under 33 C.F.R. § 20.502.

I have carefully reviewed the terms of the Settlement Agreement and find that it is fair,

reasonable and in substantial compliance with the requirements of 33 C.F.R. § 20.502.

ORDER

Upon consideration of record, it is hereby ORDERED that the Settlement Agreement is 

APPROVED in full and incorporated herein by reference. This Consent Order shall constitute 

full, final, and complete adjudication of this proceeding.

Done and dated this 27th day of June 2023, at 

Galveston, Texas

______________________________

HON. TOMMY CANTRELL

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE 

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD
EXHIBIT 11.1

                      THE FOREFRONT GROUP, INC.

        STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 For the Three Months Ended
                                                        September 30, 
                                                     1995           1996
                                                 ------------    -----------
<S>                                              <C>             <C>
Weighted average shares outstanding                 3,501,927      6,119,516
Effect of preferred stock, common stock, 
  options and warrants issued in twelve 
  months preceding the Company's initial 
  public offering                                     817,538            ---
                                                 ------------    -----------
Shares used in computing net loss per share         4,319,465      6,119,516
                                                 ============    ===========
Net loss                                         $   (216,962)   $(2,685,804)
                                                 ============    ===========
Net loss per share                               $      (0.05)   $     (0.44)
                                                 ============    ===========

                                                  For the Nine Months Ended
                                                         September 30,  
                                                    1995             1996
                                                 ------------    -----------

Weighted average shares outstanding                 3,487,195      5,949,484
Effect of preferred stock, common stock, 
  options and warrants issued in twelve 
  months preceding the Company's initial 
  public offering                                     817,538            ---
                                                 ------------    -----------
Shares used in computing net loss per share         4,304,733      5,949,484
                                                 ============    ===========
Net loss                                         $   (116,556)   $(5,638,056)
                                                 ============    ===========
Net loss per share                               $      (0.03)   $     (0.95)
                                                 ============    ===========
</TABLE>
# C_2021520EN.01000301.xml

| 27.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 520/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 520/3

---

The following information is brought to the attention of

PALESTINIAN ISLAMIC JIHAD (PIJ)

group included on the list of persons, groups and entities subject to Articles 2, 3 and 4 of Council Common Position 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism and to Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism

(see Annexes to Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/1192 and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1188)

(2021/C 520/02)

The following information is brought to the attention of the above-mentioned group listed in Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/1192 (1) and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1188 (2).

Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 (3) provides for a freezing of all funds, other financial assets and economic resources belonging to the persons and groups concerned and that no funds, other financial assets and economic resources may be made available to them, whether directly or indirectly.

The Council has been provided with new information relevant to the listing of the above-mentioned group. Having considered this new information, the Council intends to amend the statements of reasons accordingly.

The group concerned may submit a request to obtain the intended statements of reasons for maintaining it on the above-mentioned list to the following address:

| Council of the European Union (Attn: COMET designations) |
| --- |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union (Attn: COMET designations)

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

Such a request should be submitted by 3 January 2022.

The group may submit at any time a request to the Council, together with any supporting documentation, that the decision to include and maintain it on the list should be reconsidered, to the address provided above. Such requests will be considered when they are received. In this respect, the attention of the group concerned is drawn to the regular review by the Council of the list according to Article 1(6) of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP (4).

The attention of the group concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as listed in the Annex to the Regulation in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for essential needs or specific payments in accordance with Article 5(2) of that Regulation.

---

(1)  OJ L 258, 20.7.2021, p. 42.

(2)  OJ L 258, 20.7.2021, p. 14.

(3)  OJ L 344, 28.12.2001, p. 70.

(4)  OJ L 344, 28.12.2001, p. 93.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Balance Sheets and Statements of Operations and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        JUN-30-1997               JUN-29-1996  
<PERIOD-START>                           JUN-30-1996               SEP-19-1995  
<PERIOD-END>                             SEP-28-1996               SEP-30-1995 
<CASH>                                           414                       740  
<SECURITIES>                                       0                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 36,770                     4,550 
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (250)                         0
<INVENTORY>                                   41,521                    19,037
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              84,894                    24,967
<PP&E>                                        88,512                    30,887
<DEPRECIATION>                               (4,284)                      (99) 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               526,032                   206,942
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         88,688                     9,799
<BONDS>                                      313,232                   127,500 
<COMMON>                                           0                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0                         0
<PREFERRED>                                        0                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                   121,115                    69,582
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 526,032                   206,942
<SALES>                                       78,153                    25,616
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              78,153                    25,616
<CGS>                                         33,825                    12,263
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 33,825                    12,263 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              40,301                    12,393
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  60                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             8,235                       534
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (4,268)                       426
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (1,707)                       457
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (2,561)                      (31)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0                         0 
<CHANGES>                                          0                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (2,561)                      (31)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0                         0
        

</TABLE>
#### O’Hara v. The State.

Appeal from Montgomery City Court.

Tried before the Hon. A. D. Sayre.

Gordon Macdonald, for appellant.

Charles G. Brown, Attorney-General, for the State.

Opinion by

Dowdell, J.

The appellant was indicted, tried and convicted for carrying on the business of an auctioneer without a license and contrary to law.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed on the authority of *O’Hara v.*State, 121 Ala. 28.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1997             JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1996             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996             OCT-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1                       1
<CASH>                                               0              52,179,477
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0              97,339,057
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0            (37,077,147)
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0             124,162,744
<PP&E>                                               0              57,859,478
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0            (12,185,551)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0             361,393,740
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0              45,660,808
<BONDS>                                              0             100,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                 295,902
<OTHER-SE>                                           0             182,955,465
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0             361,393,740
<SALES>                                    140,100,931             250,342,685
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           140,100,931             250,342,685
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           124,600,626             235,655,077
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,040,385               3,145,855
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             14,459,920              11,541,753
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,917,650               7,084,704
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          9,542,270               4,457,049
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 9,542,270               4,457,049
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.35                    0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.35                    0.15
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-07-193-CV

DESA HEATING, LLC 	APPELLANT

	V.

KBK FINANCIAL, INC., HEARTLAND 	APPELLEES

U.S.A., L.L.C., SAM L. DRYER, U.S. 

PRODUCTS, INC., AND AMERICAN 

CABINET MANUFACTURING, L.L.C.

	AND

AMERICAN CABINET MANUFACTURING, 	APPELLANTS

L.L.C. AND HEARTLAND U.S.A., L.L.C.

	V.

KBK FINANCIAL, INC. AND DESA HEATING, LLC	APPELLEES

	----------

	FROM THE 17TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	----------

	We have considered “DESA Heating, LLC’s Motion To Dismiss Appeal As To KBK Financial, Inc.”  

	The motion is GRANTED.  Appellant DESA Heating, LLC’s appeal as to appellee KBK Financial, Inc. is dismissed.  The appeal of DESA Heating, LLC shall hereafter be styled “DESA Heating, LLC v. Heartland U.S.A., L.L.C., Sam L. Dryer, U.S. Products, Inc., and American Cabinet Manufacturing, L.L.C.”

							PER CURIAM

PANEL A:  CAYCE, C.J.; LIVINGSTON and MCCOY, JJ.

DELIVERED:  August 16, 2007
#### Chaskie J. Rosenberg, Appellant, v Metlife, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Submitted December 18, 2006;

decided January 9, 2007

Motion by the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association for leave to appear amicus curiae on consideration of the certified question herein granted only to the extent that the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief may be served and 24 copies filed within seven days.
#### In re HODGMAN’S ESTATE. In the matter of the estate of Frederick Hodgman, deceased.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

December 18, 1896.)

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10
- 08
- 00013
- CV
SPHERION CORPORATION , Appellant
v. MELVIN CHOAT , Appellee

From the 170th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2007
- 2777
- 4

MEMORANDUM OPINION
The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss and an unopposed motion for
release of bond

. Per the parties’ agreement, we grant the motions and dismiss the appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.1( a )(2) . We further order the District Clerk of McLennan County to release the bond filed in connection with this appeal. Sepada v. Barnes , NO.
12

- 08

- 00271

- CV, 2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 4012 (Tex. App.

— Tyler May 29, 2009, no pet.) (mem. op.). Costs are taxed against the party incurring same

.Spherion Corp. v. Choat Page 2 FELIPE REYNA Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Reyna , and Justice Davis Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed August 5, 2009 [CV06]
exhibit1018.htm


Exhibit 10.18












CHARLES & COLVARD, LTD.


BOARD OF DIRECTORS COMPENSATION PROGRAM







Designated independent members of the Board of Directors of Charles & Colvard, Ltd. shall be compensated as follows:








	
Annual Retainer:

	
Directors - $18,000 paid in two installments – May & November, pro-rated as applicable.


 


	  	
Chairman - $25,000 paid in two installments – May & November, pro-rated as applicable.


 


	
Restricted Stock:

	
Restricted stock grant upon appointment as a member of the Board by the Board to fill a vacancy in the Board, with a grant date value to be determined by the Board as appropriate considering the time remaining before re-election at the next annual shareholders meeting.


 


Restricted stock grant upon annual re-election as a director with a grant date value of $50,000 for Directors and $55,000 for the Chairman.


 


The only restriction on the restricted shares shall be service on the Board of Directors until the next annual shareholders meeting following the grant.


 


	
Attendance Participation Fee:


 


	  	
Board Meetings:

	
$1,000 per in person meeting, per telephonic meeting lasting more than 4 hours, or per telephonic meeting lasting less than 4 hours but that involved substantive preparation as determined by the Chairman of the Board


 


$500 per telephonic meeting lasting at least 1.5 hours and less than 4 hours


 


$200 per telephonic meeting lasting less than 1.5 hours

















 




  





  











  














	  	
Committee Meeting in person, telephonic meeting lasting more than 4 hours, or telephonic meeting lasting less than 4 hours but that involved substantive preparation as determined by the Chair of the Committee:


 

	  
	  	
Audit Committee:

	
Chair -         $2,000 per meeting


Members -   $1,000 per meeting


 


	  	
Compensation Committee, Long-Term Planning Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee:


 

	
Chair -         $1,000 per meeting


Members -   $1,000 per meeting


	  	
Telephonic Committee Meeting lasting at least 1.5 hours and less than 4 hours:


 


 

	
$500 per meeting


	  	
Telephonic Committee Meeting less than 1.5 hours


 

	
$200 per meeting


	
Board and Committee fees are capped at a maximum of $2,750 per day for each Director who serves on multiple committees.


The Board Chairperson shall assist in scheduling all committee meetings. Insubstantial meetings as determined by the appropriate Chair (e.g. simply approving prior minutes or brief approval for required action, will not be compensated).


Fees are to be paid in arrears for prior quarter’s meetings.

















# 1536562_3.Doc
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (No. 333-146557and No. 333-135485) on Form S-3 of GeoPetro Resources Company of ourreports dated March 23, 2009, relating to our audits of the consolidatedfinancial statements and internal control over financial reporting, whichappear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of GeoPetro Resources Companyfor the year ended December 31, 2008.

 

***/s/ HEIN**** & ASSOCIATES LLP*

Dallas,Texas

March 23,2009

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

WILLIAM BRUNSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 302 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

WILLIAM BRUNSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 303 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 27th day of February, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
Listen

# North Carolina Advisory Committee Releases Report on the Civil Rights and Equity of Legal Financial Obligations

August 28, 2023

The North Carolina Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights issued a report on the Civil Rights and Equity of Legal Financial Obligations (LFOs) in the state. The report was issued after a series of public hearings in 2020 and in 2022 which resulted in a compilation of testimony from directly impacted individuals, judges, legislators, organizations, and other professionals in the field with specific knowledge of and experience with the conditions and challenges surrounding the court system. Through this investigation, the Committee explored issues regarding how LFOs have increased over the years and how there is an increased reliance on a substantial portion of their revenue being used to defray general government expenses.

Press Release

Report

North Carolina

-  All News 
-  Commission News 
-  Advisory Committees News 
-  Correspondence 
-  Videos 
-  Archives
Order filed August 5 , 2021

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 17

- 00207

- CV

____________ LANDRY'S, INC. AND HOUSTON AQUARIUM, INC. , Appellant s
V.
ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, CARNEY ANNE NASSER, AND

CHERYL CONLEY , Appellee s

On A p p eal from the 334th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2016

- 79698



### ORDER

This case has been remanded to our court from the Supreme Court of Texas

. Appellant s filed a motion requesting leave to file supplemental briefing addressing

t he iss ues that remain pending before this court following the S upr eme Court of
Texas ’ s opinion affirming and reversing this court ’ s judgment in part and remanding this cause to ou r court for further proce edings consistent with the Supreme Court ’ s opinion

. We grant a ppellant s ’ motion and order supplementa l briefing du e by the f

ollowing dates:
Appellant s ’ Brief is due Septem ber 7, 2021;
Appellee s Re sponse Brief is due : 30 day s from the date appellant s ’ brief isfiled ;

Appellants ’ Reply Brief
, i f an y, is due: 20 days from the date appellees ’

response brief is filed.

All briefs sha ll comply with the l ength requirements of briefs provided for in
the Texas R ules of Appellate Procedure.

PER CURI AM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Christopher and J ustices Jewell and Pois sant

.