alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001001865
<NAME>                        COAST RESORTS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         60,217
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  5,416
<ALLOWANCES>                                   704
<INVENTORY>                                    6,481
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               84,946
<PP&E>                                         608,567
<DEPRECIATION>                                 129,770
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 573,230
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          95,043
<BONDS>                                        339,892
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       15
<OTHER-SE>                                     114,295
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   573,230
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               293,670
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  173,094
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               74,580
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             19,384
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                31,899
<INCOME-TAX>                                   11,127
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            20,772
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   20,772
<EPS-BASIC>                                    14.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  14.10



</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Timothy L. Moriarty, Appellant.

Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Green, Balio and Schnepp, JJ.
#### Violand & McCarthy v. A. P. Saxel.

Where the process was returnable on a' day after the date of the writ, it was not in accordance with the statute, and the judgment by default was reversed. (Paschal's Dig., Art. 1431.)

Error from Bexar. The ease was tried before Hon. Thomas J. Pevihe, one of the district judges.

The petition of A.P. Saxel against E. S.Violand and Justin McCarthy was filed on the 16th day of October, I860,' and the citations to the defendants, issued on the same day, summoning them to appear and answer at the term of the court to be holden “ on the first Monday of March, A. D. 1860.”

The judgment was rendered by default on the 15th of March, 1861. The defendants prosecuted error, and assigned the insufficiency of service. It will be observed that the court reversed, but did not define the effect (in the district court) of appearing to prosecute error.

*I P. Simpson,*for plaintiffs in error.

Ho brief for defendant in error has been furnished to the Reporter.

Morrill, C. J.

—The petition was filed 16th October, 1860, citation issued 16th October, 1860, directing the sheriff to summon the defendants to appear on the [first] Monday of March, 1860; judgment by default 15th March, 1861.

The statute (Paschal’s Dig., Art. 1431) requires the writ to state the time and place of holding the court.

As the month of March has more than one Monday, the requirements of the statute are not complied with unless the particular Monday is stated. [The writ was returnable on “the first Monday in March, A., P. *1860.”*— Reporter. Moreover, had the numerical Monday been stated, the writ *284was bad by requiring the defendants to appear at a time that had elapsed before the writ was issued. Judgment reversed and cause

Demanded.
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2620 

AN ACT 

To amend the United States Cotton Futures Act to exclude 

certain cotton futures contracts from coverage under 

such Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2620 EH

1 SECTION 1. EXCLUDING CERTAIN COTTON FUTURES CON2 TRACTS FROM COVERAGE UNDER UNITED 

3 STATES COTTON FUTURES ACT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c)(1) of the United 

5 States Cotton Futures Act (7 U.S.C. 15B(c)(1)) is amend6 ed— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘except that any cotton futures 

8 contract’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘except that— 

9 ‘‘(A) any cotton futures contract’’; 

10 (2) in subparagraph (A) (as designated by 

11 paragraph (1)), by striking the period at the end 

12 and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

13 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub14 paragraph: 

15 ‘‘(B) any cotton futures contract that per16 mits tender of cotton grown outside of the 

17 United States is excluded from the coverage of 

18 this paragraph and section to the extent that 

19 the cotton grown outside of the United States 

20 is tendered for delivery under the cotton futures 

21 contract.’’. 

22 (b) APPLICATION.—The amendments made by sub23 section (a) shall apply with respect to cotton futures con-
3 

•HR 2620 EH

1 tracts entered into on or after the date of the enactment 

2 of this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 23, 2015. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2620 

AN ACT 

To amend the United States Cotton Futures Act to 

erage under such Act. exclude certain cotton futures contracts from cov-
#### Jane Lannon, Respondent, v James P. Lannon, Jr., Appellant.

Memorandum: This is a proceeding to enforce a judgment directing payment of support. Defendant’s claim that Supreme Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the proceeding is without merit. The State Constitution grants general original jurisdiction in law and equity to the Supreme Court (NY Const, art VI, § 7 [a]). Jurisdiction. of the Family Court is limited to certain well-defined classes of actions and proceedings (NY Const, art VI, § 13) and as to those, Supreme Court has concurrent jurisdiction *(Matter of Seitz v Drogheo,*21 NY2d 181; *Kagen v Kagen,*21 NY2d 532). Since the Supreme Court may not be divested of its jurisdiction, the parties’ agreement to confer jurisdiction on Family Court cannot act to vitiate the constitutional grant of jurisdiction to Supreme Court *(see, Green v Green,*50 AD2d 235; *see also,*NY Const, art VI, § 19). *1052Equally without merit is defendant’s argument that plaintiff waived her rights to the support payments by having failed earlier to seek enforcement. While it is true that this proceeding was brought more than *IV2*years after entry of the judgment, that fact alone does not compel a finding of either waiver or nonwaiver as a matter of law *(Maule v Kaufman,*33 NY2d 58, 62, *rearg denied*33 NY2d 940). A waiver is an intentional relinquishment of a known right, either express or implied, by such actions or failures to act as demonstrate an intent to relinquish such right *(Hadden v Consolidated Edison Co.,*45 NY2d 466). On this record, it is unrefuted by defendant that plaintiff made repeated demands for support payments as required by the separation agreement and the judgment of divorce. It is apparent that she never surrendered her right to receive such payments *(see, Katzenstein v Katzenstein,*90 AD2d 533).

Other issues raised by defendant are also without merit. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Sedita, J. —arrears.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Denman, Green and Lawton, JJ.
Order entered May 20, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 21

- 00166

- CV

PAUL BRADLEY “BRAD” JOWELL , Appellant

V.

BIOTE MEDICAL. LLC , Appellee

On Appeal from the 1 92nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 20

- 18668

O RDER

Before the Court is appellee’s May 19, 2021 motion for an extension of time

to file its brief on the merits. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to June

18, 20 21 . We caution appellee that further extension requests in this accelerated

appeal will be disfavored.

/s/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN JUSTICE
#### SNECKER, Respondent, v. SNECKER, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 13, 1896.)

Action by Louise P. Snecker against William Snecker.

A. H. Hummel, for appellant.

J. A. Beall, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


CI2021333EN.01001301.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 19.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 333/13 |

---

Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

(2021/C 333 I/04)

Pursuant to Article 9(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 [(1)](#ntr1-CI2021333EN.01001301-E0001), the Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union [(2)](#ntr2-CI2021333EN.01001301-E0002) are hereby amended as follows:

On page 414:

9506

Articles and equipment for general physical exercise, gymnastics, athletics, other sports (including table tennis) or outdoor games, not specified or included elsewhere in this chapter; swimming pools and paddling pools

Delete and replace the current explanatory note by the following:

‘This heading does not include resistance bands, fitness bands or similar products, for example simple loops, without handles or any other similar additional element that makes them identifiable as articles for general physical exercise. These products are usually packed individually or in packs of two or more for retail sale. They are available in different colours and sizes and may have imprints. According to their objective characteristics, these bands or other similar products are not identifiable as articles for general physical exercise. Consequently, they are to be classified according to their constituent material, for example in heading 4008 as “strips of non-cellular rubber” (see also note 1 and note 9 to Chapter 40), in heading 4016 as “other articles of vulcanised rubber other than hard rubber” or in heading 6307 as “other made-up textile articles”.

Examples of bands, fitness bands or similar products that are to be classified according to their constituent material:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Image 1 | Image 2 |
| Rubber band (heading 4008 ) | Rubber loop (heading 4016 ) |

![Image 3](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/uriserv/OJ.CI.2021.333.01.0013.01.ENG.xhtml.CI2021333EN.01001401.tif.jpg)

Textile loop (heading 6307)’

---

[(1)](#ntc1-CI2021333EN.01001301-E0001)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff ([OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_1987_256_R_TOC)).

[(2)](#ntc2-CI2021333EN.01001301-E0002)  [OJ C 119, 29.3.2019, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2019_119_R_TOC).

---
#### Jacob Carroll, Jr. v. William D. W. Peck.

A writ, dated 19th December, 1866, was directed “ to the sheriff of Gonzales county.” It was not fatal to the writ that it was not directed to “ the sheriff or any constable,” as required by the amendatory act of 12th November, 1866. (Paschal’s Dig., 2d ed., Art. 1430.)

Error from Gonzales. The case was tried before Hon. J. J. Holt, one of the district judges.

*650The writ was directed to the sheriff of Gonzales county. The judgment was by default. The defendant below, among other things, assigned for error, that no legal writ had been served on him.

*Finlay £ Stewart,*for plaintiff in error.

—The'judgment was by default, and the citation was illegal and void, because it was directed to the “ sheriff of Gonzales county,” and not “ to the sheriff or any constable of Gonzales county,” as required by the act of November 12, 1866. (Acts, p. 199; Frosch v. Schlumpf, 2 Tex., 422; Neill v. Brown, 11 Tex., 17.)

*Conley £ O’Connor,*for defendant in error,

suggested delay.

Caldwell, J.

—The only error relied on in this court is, that there was no sufficient service, in this, that the writ was “directed to the sheriff of Gonzales county,” and not to the “ sheriff or any constable of Gonzales county.”

The statute is in the alternative, and the writ may be directed to the. sheriff only, or, for sufficient cause, to the constable.

Judgment affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 182 (Thursday, September 23, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 52916]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-20582]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Advancing Translational 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; SEP Limited Competition: Clinical 
and Translational Science Award (CTSA) Consortium-Wide Centers: 
Resources for Rapid Demonstration and Dissemination (U24 Clinical 
Trials Not Allowed).
    Date: October 20, 2021.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, 
National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Room 1037, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Victor Henriquez, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Center for Advancing 
Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Democracy Boulevard, Room 1037, Bethesda, MD 20817, (301) 435-0813, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a0c8c5ced2c9d1d5d6e0cdc1c9cc8ecec9c88ec7cfd6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="670f0209150e161211270a060e0b49090e0f49000811">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.859, 
Pharmacology, Physiology, and Biological Chemistry Research; 93.350, 
B--Cooperative Agreements; 93.859, Biomedical Research and Research 
Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 17, 2021.
David W. Freeman,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-20582 Filed 9-22-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 179 (Monday, September 20, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 52140]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-20249]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP21-1108-000.
    Applicants: Cove Point LNG, LP.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Cove Point--Interim PVIC 
Adjustment Filing to be effective 10/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 9/13/21.
    Accession Number: 20210913-5113.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 9/27/21.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: September 14, 2021.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-20249 Filed 9-17-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Exhibit 10.10.3

Third Amendment to
Coldwater Creek Inc.
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

1.     Section 3.5
"Adjustments for Form of Benefit" shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

"An
election under this Section 3.5 for a form of benefit other than a single life annuity may be made at any time before the end of the calendar year prior to the year of the
Participant's Early Retirement Date. After any appropriate reduction is made in a Participant's pension under this Plan for the commencement of payment prior to the Participant's Normal Retirement
Date, appropriate adjustment shall be made in the form of a joint or survivor annuity, if elected. The joint and survivor annuity which may be elected is an annuity payable in monthly installments for
the life of the Participant, to continue after the Participant's death at 50% or 100% of the Participant's benefit to the individual designated Beneficiary for life if that designated Beneficiary
survives the Participant. The last benefit payment under this optional form shall be the payment due on the first day of the month in which occurs the later of the death of the Participant or the
death of the designated Beneficiary. The percentage of the Participant's benefit to be continued and the individual Beneficiary must be irrevocably designated by the Participant prior to the time
benefits commence to the Participant. This form of payment shall be the Actuarial Equivalent of the single life annuity otherwise payable to the Participant, based on the age of the Participant and
the age of the Participant's beneficiary as of the Benefit Commencement Date."

2.     In
all respects not amended, the SERP is confirmed and ratified. All capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed in the SERP.

*    *    *

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997             JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          22,017                  22,017
<SECURITIES>                                    17,330                  17,330
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,934                   7,934
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,161                   1,161
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                48,020                  48,020
<PP&E>                                           4,853                   4,853
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,048                   2,048
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  51,253                  51,253
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,357                  14,357
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        53,182                  53,182
<OTHER-SE>                                     (16,479)                (16,479)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    51,253                  51,253
<SALES>                                         10,411                  16,934
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,411                  16,934
<CGS>                                            2,423                   4,644
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,423                   4,644
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,006                  20,973
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  26                      66
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,428)                 (7,690)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       105                     205
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,533)                 (7,895)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,533)                 (7,895)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.13)                  (0.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.13)                  (0.69)
        

</TABLE>
PROLONG INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES



EXHIBIT 32



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of

the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Elton Alderman, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Prolong International Corporation (the Company), and Nicolaas M. Rosier, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, each certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d); and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |                                    
|------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------
|                    |  | 
|Dated: June 4, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    ELTON ALDERMAN              
|                    |  |  |  |                                    
|                    |  |  |  | Elton Alderman, Chairman, President
|                    |  |  |  | and Chief Executive Officer        
|                    |  |  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)      



|                    |  |  |  |                                             
|------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------
|                    |  | 
|Dated: June 4, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    NICOLAAS M. ROSIER                   
|                    |  |  |  |                                             
|                    |  |  |  | Nicolaas M. Rosier, Chief Financial Officer 
|                    |  |  |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)