alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Lawrence *v.*Metropolitan El. Ry. Co. et *al.*

*(Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.*

June 2, 1890.)

Appeal—Rehearing.

In an action for an injunction against the operation of an elevated railroad on the street in front of plaintiff’s premises, and for damages caused thereby, a judgment for plaintiff was reversed because of incompetent testimony concerning the value of such premises. *Meld,*that a rehearing would be granted; it not appearing that the admission of such testimony affected plaintiff’s right to an injunction.

Motion for rehearing. For former report, see 8 2í. Y. Supp. 326.

Action by Francis C. Lawrence against the Metropolitan Elevated Bailway Company and another to recover damages caused by the operation of defendant’s road in the street in front of plaintiff’s premises, and for an injunction against the operation of the road. Judgment was given for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

Argued before Bischoff and Daly, JJ.

*Edward 8. lla.pallo*and *Brainard Tolies,*for appellants. *John A.Weeks,*JV., for respondent.

Bischoff, J.

The appeal herein was argued at the January general term, 1890, and reversal of the judgment was directed, (8 N. Y. Supp. 326;) the opinion of the chief justice, concurred in by all, being to the effect that alleged incompetent testimony concerningthe fee value of the premises affected by this action was admitted upon the trial. The respondent thereupon moved at the March general term for a reargument. A careful consideration of the briefs submitted upon the last-mentioned motion shows a probable error in directing a reversal of the judgment appealed from in its entirety. The admission of such alleged incompetent testimony does not seem to affect the plaintiff’s right to an injunction restraining the defendants from the further operation of their road in front of the plaintiff’s premises, as directed by the judgment; and there is thus presented to this court a fair question as to whether so much of the judgment as directs the injunction should not have been affirmed, and the reversal limited to the award of the fee damages. I think, therefore, that the respondent has shown himself to be entitled to a reargument of this' appeal, within the provisions of rule 16 of this court, and that such reargument should be ordered.
No. 07-15-00090-CV

Evangelos Pagonis

 Appellant

v.

Catherine Thomas

 Appellee

§

§

§

§

From the County Court

 of Hartley County

August 10, 2015

Opinion by Justice Hancock

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated August 10, 2015, it is ordered,

adjudged and decreed that the county court’s judgment is vacated and this appeal is

dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis, no costs beyond those which

may have been paid are adjudged. 

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance. 

o O o

FILE COPY
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice Number 3265]

The Department of State announces that it has renewed the charter of the International Telecommunication Advisory Committee (ITAC), a committee under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), Public Law 92-463. The purpose of the ITAC is to advise the Department of State and provide strategic planning recommendations on telecommunications and information policy matters related to United States participation in the work of international telecommunication treaty organizations. The ITAC is composed of three Sectors—Radiocommunication, Telecommunication Development, and Telecommunication Standardization.

Members of the general public may attend ITAC meetings. Entrance to the Department of State is controlled; people intending to attend any of the ITAC meetings should notify the Department by fax at (202) 647-7407 not later than 24 hours before the meeting. One of the following valid photo identifications will be required for admission: U.S. driver's license, passport, U.S. Government identification card. Enter from the C Street Lobby; in view of escorting requirements, non-Government attendees should plan to arrive not less than 15 minutes before the meeting begins. Actual room assignments may be determined at the lobby or by calling the Secretariat at 202 647-0965/2592.

Attendees may join in the discussions, subject to the instructions of the Chair. Admission of members will be limited to seating available.

Dated: April 12, 2000.

Julian Minard,

Executive Secretary, Multilateral Trade Affairs, U.S. Department of State.

[FR Doc. 00-9799 Filed 4-18-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-45-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      17,127,971
<SECURITIES>                                   200,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   88,278
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,500,089
<PP&E>                                       2,481,307
<DEPRECIATION>                                 516,672
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,692,557
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,236,037
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,795
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,944,020
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,692,557
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               695,866
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,820,923
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (10,689,940)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (10,689,940)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (10,689,940)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.66)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2021448EN.01000501.xml

| 5.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 448/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 448/5

---

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 448/04)

| Member State | Spain |
| --- | --- |
| Route concerned | Almeria – Sevilla |
| Reopening date of the PSO routes to community air carriers | 1 August 2022 |
| Address where the text and any other information or documentation related to the public service obligations can be obtained. | Ministerio de Transportes, Movilidad y Agenda |
| Urbana |
| Dirección General de Aviación Civil |
| Subdirección General de Transporte Aéreo |
| Paseo de la Castellana 67 |
| 28071 Madrid |
| ESPAÑA |

Member State

Spain

Route concerned

Almeria – Sevilla

Reopening date of the PSO routes to community air carriers

1 August 2022

Address where the text and any other information or documentation related to the public service obligations can be obtained.

Ministerio de Transportes, Movilidad y Agenda

Urbana

Dirección General de Aviación Civil

Subdirección General de Transporte Aéreo

Paseo de la Castellana 67

28071 Madrid

ESPAÑA

Tel. +34 915977505

Fax +34 915978643

Email: osp.dgac@mitma.es

The routes subject to public service obligations may be operated on the basis of free competition access as from 1 August 2022. In the event that no air carrier submits a program of services compliant with the public service obligations imposed, access will be restricted to a single air carrier through the corresponding public tender procedure, in accordance with Article 16 (9) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008.

---
# C_2023167EN.01013601.xml

| 11.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 167/136 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 167/136

---

P9_TA(2022)0398

EU/New Zealand Agreement: modification of concessions on all the tariff rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV

European Parliament legislative resolution of 22 November 2022 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and New Zealand pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions on all the tariff rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union (07910/2022 — C9-0296/2022 — 2022/0098(NLE))

(Consent)

(2023/C 167/27)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (07910/2022), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (07910/2022),

| — | having regard to the draft agreement between the European Union and New Zealand pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions on all the tariff rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union (07911/2022), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft agreement between the European Union and New Zealand pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions on all the tariff rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union (07911/2022),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 207(4), first subparagraph, and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C9-0296/2022), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 207(4), first subparagraph, and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C9-0296/2022),

| — | having regard to Rule 105(1) and (4), and Rule 114(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 105(1) and (4), and Rule 114(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade (A9-0273/2022), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade (A9-0273/2022),

| 1. | Gives its consent to the conclusion of the agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of New Zealand. |
| --- | --- |

2.

---
#### Mayor of the City of New York, Appellant, v Council of the City of New York, Respondent. Lillian Roberts, as Executive Director of District Council 37, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, et al., Intervenors-Respondents.

Submitted March 26, 2007;

decided March 29, 2007

Motion by United Federation of Teachers et al. for leave to appear amici curiae on the appeal herein granted only to the extent that the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief may be served and 24 copies filed within seven days.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20991-20992]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9714]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. 99N-4202]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of OMB 
Approval; Application to Market a New Drug, Biologic, or an Antibiotic 
Drug for Human Use

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
collection of information entitled ``Application to Market a New Drug, 
Biologic, or an Antibiotic Drug for Human Use'' has been approved by 
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: JonnaLynn P. Capezzuto, Office of 
Information Resources Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug 
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-4659.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of February 2, 2000 
(65 FR 4979), the agency announced that the proposed information 
collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 
U.S.C. 3507. An

[[Page 20992]]

agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to 
respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently 
valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the information 
collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0338. The approval 
expires on March 31, 2003. A copy of the supporting statement for this 
information collection is available on the Internet at http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets.

    Dated: April 12, 2000.
William K. Hubbard,
Senior Associate Commissioner for Policy, Planning, and Legislation.
[FR Doc. 00-9714 Filed 4-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
Amendment No. 2 to Agreement



 Exhibit 10.5 
 SECOND AMENDMENT 
 TO THE 
 BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER 
 SUBCONTRACTOR AGREEMENT BETWEEN 
 THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION 

 AND 
 ATRICURE, INC. 
 This Second Amendment (the “Amendment”), effective as of December 28, 2009, is
between The Cleveland Clinic Foundation (“CCF”) and AtriCure, Inc. (“Subcontractor”). 
 WITNESSETH: 
 WHEREAS, this Amendment amends and supplements the Biomedical Research and
Technology Transfer Subcontractor Agreement dated the 1st
day of June, 2006, and as amended on December 1, 2008 (the “Agreement”) between Subcontractor and CCF; 
 NOW
THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises herein contained and for other good and valuable consideration, the parties hereto agree to amend the Agreement as follows: 
 1. Article 2 is amended to read as follows: 
 ARTICLE 2. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE

 “The effective period of this AGREEMENT shall commence June 6, 2005 and, subject to Article 19 of this AGREEMENT, terminate
December 31, 2010, unless otherwise provided for by modification of this AGREEMENT, which shall be in writing and signed by all parties to this AGREEMENT.” 
 2. Except as modified by this Second Amendment, the terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect. All capitalized words not defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the
Agreement. In the event of any conflict between this Second Amendment and the Agreement, this Second Amendment shall control. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereby execute this Second Amendment through their authorized representatives. 
  

											
	 ATRICURE, INC.
	 		 	THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION
						
	 By:
	 	 /s/ David Drachman
	 		 	 By:
	 	 /s/ Jacqueline Whatley
	 	
	 Printed Name:
	 	 David Drachman
	 		 	 Printed Name:
	 	 Jacqueline Whatley
	 	
	 Title:
	 	 President
	 		 	 Title:
	 	 Senior Director
	 	
		 		 		 		 	 Office of Sponsored Research and Projects
	 	
		 		 		 		 	  
 APPROVED AS TO FORM CCF:
LAW DEPT.
	 	
		 		 		 		 		 	
		 		 		 		 	 DATE: 12/30/2009        
  
 CMST #: ATR 39907
	 	
		 		 		 		 	  
 BY:
	 	

  

 1
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

By signing this Form 10-K, I hereby appoint each of A. Laurence Jones and
William Buchholz as my attorneys-in-fact to sign all amendments to this Form
10-K on my behalf, and file this Form 10-K (including all exhibits and other
documents related to the Form 10-K) with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
I authorize each of my attorneys-in-fact to (1) appoint a substitute
attorney-in-fact for himself and (2) perform any actions that he believes are
necessary or appropriate to carry out the intention and purpose of this Power of
Attorney. I ratify and confirm all lawful actions taken directly or indirectly
by my attorneys-in-fact and by any properly appointed substitute
attorneys-in-fact.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report
has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant in the
capacities and dates indicated.

<Table>
<Caption>
Signature                           Title                                                        Date
---------                           -----                                                        ----
<S>                                 <C>                                                          <C>
/s/  A. Laurence Jones              President and Chief Executive Officer and Director           March 27, 2001
----------------------              (Principal Executive Officer)
     A. Laurence Jones

/s/  William Buchholz               Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration          March 27, 2001
---------------------               Chief Financial Officer
     William Buchholz               (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

/s/  Bradley A. Feld                Co-Chairman of the Board                                     March 27, 2001
---------------------
     Bradley A. Feld

/s/  Gerald A. Poch                 Co-Chairman of the Board                                     March 27, 2001
-------------------
     Gerald A. Poch

/s/  Dennis J. Cagan                Director                                                     March 27, 2001
--------------------
     Dennis J. Cagan

/s/ R. Terry Duryea                 Director                                                     March 27, 2001
-------------------
    R. Terry Duryea

/s/ Pamela H. Patsley               Director                                                     March 27, 2001
---------------------
    Pamela H. Patsley
</Table>
(8 Misc. Rep. 428.)

#### FLANDREAU v. ELSWORTH.

(Superior Court of New York City, General Term.

May 7, 1894.)

Trial—Direction of Verdict Subject to Opinion op Court.

A direction oí a verdict subject to the opinion of the court at general! term is improper, and constitutes a mistrial, where there are exceptions on either side to the admission or rejection of evidence.

*672Action by Frank Flandreau against Philip Elsworth. A judgment was directed in favor of plaintiff, subject to the opinion of the court at general term, and plaintiff now moves for a judgment on the verdict. Denied.

Argued before SEDGWICK, C. J., and FREEDMAN and McADAM, J J.

Mooney & Shipman, for plaintiff.

Turner, McClure & Rolston, for defendant.

FREEDMAN, J.

At the trial a verdict was directed in favor of the plaintiff, subject to the opinion of the court at general term. Such a direction is proper only where, upon the trial, an uncontroverted state of facts is presented, involving only questions of law, and there are no exceptions on either side to the reception or rejection of evidence. If there are exceptions, and the unsuccessful party desires to move upon them for a new trial, at the general term in the first instance, he must apply for and obtain from the trial judge an order that such motion upon said exceptions be heard in the first instance at general term, and that the entry of judgment be suspended until the decision of the general term. A confounding of the two remedies was always held to be a mistrial, and ground for a new trial. It was so before the Code of Civil Procedure (Mason v. Breslin, 32 N. Y. Super. Ct. 386); and the said Code has not changed the practice (Westervelt v. Westervelt, 46 N. Y. Super. Ct. 298). The two cases cited contain such a full discussion of this subject that a bare reference to them is sufficient for present purposes.

The case before us contains exceptions by both parties to the admission of evidence, and exceptions by the defendant to the denials of two separate motions for a dismissal of the complaint, to the refusal to direct a verdict for the defendant, and to the direction of a verdict in plaintiff's favor. Under these circumstances, the direction of a verdict subject to the opinion of the court at general term was a mistrial. The verdict should be set aside, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the party finally prevailing in the action, unless the parties have the record corrected by striking from the case all the exceptions. If such correction be made, the cause may be noticed upon the record as corrected for argument at the next general term.