alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                   Page 13 of 24



                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(e)

                        KEYCORP STUDENT LOAN TRUST 2000-A

                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas          Key Bank USA, National Association
fka, Bankers Trust Company                    800 Superior Avenue, 4th Floor
60 Wall Street, 26th floor - MS NYC60-2606     Cleveland, Ohio 44114
New York, NY  10017                           ATTN: President, KER
Attn: Corporate Trust & Agency Group          Phone: (216) 828-4293
Structured Finance                            Fax: (216) 828-9301
Phone: (212) 250-8522
Fax: (212) 797-8606


MBIA  Insurance Corporation
113 King Street
Armonk, NY 10504
ATTN: Data Administration
Phone: (914) 765-3772
Fax: (914) 765-3810


Pursuant to Section 3.09 of the Indenture between KeyCorp Student Loan Trust
2000-A, as Issuer, and Bankers Trust Company, as Indenture Trustee, dated June
1, 2000, the undersigned hereby certifies that (i) a review of the activities of
the Issuer from January 1, 2003, through December 31, 2003, and of its
performance under the Indenture has been made, and (ii) to the best of my
knowledge, based on such review, the Issuer has fulfilled all its obligations
under the Indenture throughout such period.

                             KEYCORP STUDENT LOAN TRUST 2000-A,
                             as Issuer

                              By:   JPMorgan Chase Bank, as successor in
                                    interest to Bank One, National
                                    Association not in its individual
                                    capacity but solely as Eligible Lender
                                    Trustee


                             By:   /S/ JEFFREY L. KINNEY
                                   ------------------------------
Date: February 6, 2004             Name: Jeffrey L. Kinney
                                   Title: Attorney-in-Fact
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A (the Report) to the Annual Report of Harbor Global Company Ltd. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen G. Kasnet, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Dated: August 18, 2005



/s/ STEPHEN G. KASNETStephen G. Kasnet Chief Executive Officer




This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
EXHIBIT 23.1



/Letterhead/

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
on Form S-8 for Trycera Financial, Inc. (SEC File No. 333-140585) of our
report dated April 1, 2007, relating to our audit of the consolidated
financial statements of Trycera Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries included
in the Form 10-KSB/A-1 for the year ended December 31, 2006.



/S/ Chisholm, Bierwolf, Nilson, LLC

Chisholm, Bierwolf, Nilson, LLC
Bountiful, Utah
April 25, 2007
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**192 CA 14-01391**  PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ.

MICHELLE CASHION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ALEXANDER T. BAJOREK AND JUDITH BAJOREK, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

SCHNITTER CICCARELLI MILLS PLLC, EAST AMHERST (BRITTANY A. NASRADINAJ OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

NICHOLAS, PEROT, SMITH, BERNHARDT & ZOSH, P.C., AKRON (MICHAELANGELO J. CIERI OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Catherine R. Nugent Panepinto, J.), entered October 29, 2013 in a personal injury action. The order denied the motion of defendants for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages for injuries she allegedly sustained when she slipped and fell from outdoor steps at the home she rented from defendants. Supreme Court denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. We affirm.

Contrary to defendants’ contentions, we conclude that there are several triable issues of fact precluding summary judgment. First, there is an issue of fact whether they maintained the premises at issue in a reasonably safe condition ( see generally Zuckerman v City of New York , 49 NY2d 557, 562). We note that the allegedly open and obvious condition of the steps does not absolve defendants of their duty to keep the stairs in a safe condition but, instead, bears only on plaintiff’s comparative fault ( see Landahl v City of Buffalo , 103 AD3d 1129, 1131; Verel v Ferguson Elec. Constr. Co., Inc. , 41 AD3d 1154, 1156). Second, there is an issue of fact whether any breach of that duty “was a substantial cause of the events which produced the injury” ( Derdiarian v Felix Contr. Corp. , 51 NY2d 308, 314-315, rearg denied 52 NY2d 784; see Hahn v Tops Mkts., LLC , 94 AD3d 1546, 1548; Prystajko v Western N.Y. Pub. Broadcasting Assn. , 57 AD3d 1401, 1403). Finally, there are issues of fact whether defendants created the allegedly dangerous condition ( cf. Navetta v Onondaga Galleries LLC
, 106 AD3d 1468, 1469; see generally Ohanessian v Chase Manhattan Realty**-2- 192 CA 14-01391** 
Leasing Corp. , 193 AD2d 567, 567), and whether defendants had constructive notice of that condition ( see generally Zuckerman , 49 NY2d at 562; Wilson v 100 Carlson Park, LLC , 113 AD3d 1118, 1119).

Entered: March 20, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2458 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2458

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 5351 Lapalco Boulevard in Marrero, Louisiana, as the ``Lionel R. 
                  Collins, Sr. Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIONEL R. COLLINS, SR. POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 5351 Lapalco Boulevard in Marrero, Louisiana, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Lionel R. Collins, Sr. Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lionel R. 
Collins, Sr. Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 1, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 2458

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 5351 Lapalco Boulevard in Marrero, Louisiana, as the ``Lionel R. 
                  Collins, Sr. Post Office Building''.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Consolidated Cigar Holdings Inc. Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and
Statement of Operations and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001017550
<NAME> CONSOLIDATED CIGAR HOLDINGS INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,906
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,102
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (5,604)
<INVENTORY>                                     45,957
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                72,952
<PP&E>                                          51,146
<DEPRECIATION>                                (13,922)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 205,511
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           39,009
<BONDS>                                         90,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           307
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,048
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   205,511
<SALES>                                        216,868
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               216,868
<CGS>                                          126,013
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  162,789
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   150
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,619
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 42,244
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,449
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             29,795
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    29,795
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Secure Computing Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Timothy J. Steinkopf, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Timothy J. Steinkopf                         
|Timothy J. Steinkopf                             
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|December 6, 2005
#### In the Matter of Henry Gatson, Respondent, v Walter R. Kelly, as Superintendent of Attica Correctional Facility, et al., Appellants.

— Determination annulled, on the law, and petition granted *(see, mem in Matter of Lahey v Kelly,*125 AD2d 923 [decided herewith]). All concur, except Balio, J., who dissents and votes to confirm the determination *(see, dissenting mem in Matter of Lahey v Kelly,*125 AD2d 923,924-926 [decided herewith], *supra).*(Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J. — art 78.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Denman, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.
exv10w1







Exhibit 10.1




[Non-ESTIP Awards]




PetSmart, Inc.




2010 Performance Share Unit Program




Approved: March 23, 2010



Capitalized terms used herein but not defined shall have the meanings set forth in the PetSmart,
Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan or Performance Share Unit Grant Notice and Performance Share Unit
Agreement, as applicable.


The number of Performance Share Units awarded to Participants under the 2010 Performance Share Unit
Program (the “Program”) will be determined by the Company’s Compensation Committee or its designee
(the “Committee”), subject to the conditions set forth below (the “Performance Conditions”).


The Performance Conditions for a target award of the Performance Share Units shall be satisfied
upon the earlier of the Participant’s continuous employment through:




	(i)	 	the date of a “Change of Control Transaction,” or
	 
	(ii)	 	attainment of “earnings before taxes” as determined by the Committee (the “Performance
Criteria”) as calculated from the Company’s audited financial statements for the 2010 fiscal
year performance period (the “Performance Period”) applicable to the PSU Grant.




The number of Performance Share Units awarded due to attainment of the Performance Criteria will be
determined in accordance with the following level of actual performance.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Percentage of Target Number	 
	 	 	of Performance Share Units	 
	Level of Performance Criteria Achieved	 	to be Awarded	 
	At or below minimum performance level
	 	 	 50%	 
	At target performance level
	 	 	100%	 
	At maximum performance level
	 	 	150%	 





If actual performance is equal to or less than the minimum level of Performance Criteria, 50% of
the Performance Share Units will be awarded.


Between 50% and 150% of the Target Number of Performance Share Units will be awarded if actual
performance is at least equal to the minimum but not greater than the maximum level of the
Performance Criteria, with linear interpolation for achievement falling between the minimum and
target, and target and maximum performance levels, respectively, rounded up to the next
whole number of Performance Share Units. For example, if we achieve the target performance level, the target number
 of Performance Share Units will be awarded. If earnings before taxes results are halfway
between the minimum and target performance levels, 75% of the Target Number of Performance Share
Units will be awarded. Similarly, if performance results are halfway between the target and
maximum performance levels, each participant will receive 125% of the target number of the
Performance Share Units.


If actual performance is equal to or greater than the maximum Performance Criteria, 150% of Target Number of
Performance Share Units will be awarded.


Miscellaneous Provisions


Participation in the Program shall not alter in any way the at will nature of the Company’s
employment of a Participant, and such employment may be terminated at any time for any reason, with
or without cause and with or without prior notice.
#### Carr, Respondent, *v.*Tracy, Appellant.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.*

June 6, 1890.)

Appeal from special term, New York county.

Action by George W. Carr against Harriet R. Tracy. Defendant appeals from an order denying motion to set aside the alleged service of the summons. The affidavits for and against the motion were numerous and conflicting.

Argued before Van Brtjnt, P. J., and Brady and Daly, JJ.

*Lyon*tfe *Smith,*for appellant. *George W. Carr, pro se.*

Brady, J.

The examination of the proofs spread upon the record, and due consideration of them, has led to the conclusion that the service of the summons herein was not made as alleged. It is not intended to asperse the person who thinks he served the process, but to declare he was mistaken. The order appealed from should be reversed, and the motion made in the court below granted, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Luis Rivera, Appellant.

Submitted January 8, 2007;

decided January 11, 2007

*837Motion for an extension of the time within which to apply for permission to appeal pursuant to CPL 460.20 . granted and motion papers treated as a timely CPL 460.20 application.
EX-10.15





 Exhibit 10.15 

SPOUSAL CONSENT 
 I, Shen
Xia (ID No.: ***************), is the legally spouse of Luo Jian (ID No.: ***************). I hereby unconditionally and irrevocably consent to the execution of the following documents (collectively the “Transaction Documents”, including,
for the avoidance of doubt, other relevant documents executed for the purpose of engaging in the transactions contemplated by the Transaction Documents, as the same may be amended from time to time) by Luo Jian and to the disposal of the equity
interest in Beijing Xingengyuan Science and Technology Co., Ltd. (the “Company”) registered in the name of Luo Jian in accordance with the following Transaction Documents: 

1. Exclusive Option Agreement among Luo Jian , the Company and Beijing Spark Education and Technology Co., Ltd. (the “WFOE”) on
July 24, 2020 ; 
 2. Equity Pledge Agreement among Luo Jian , the Company and WFOE on July 24, 2020 ; 

3. Power of Attorney among Luo Jian , the Company and the WFOE on July 24, 2020. 

I undertake not to make any claims in respect of the equity interest held by Luo Jian in the Company. I further confirm that the performance
by Luo Jian of the Transaction Documents and further amendment to or termination of the Transaction Documents do not need my further authorization or consent. I undertake to execute all necessary documents and take all necessary actions to ensure
that the Transaction Documents shall be duly performed. 
 I agree and undertake that if I acquire any equity interest in the Company held
by Luo Jian for whatever reason, I shall be bound by the Transaction Documents and comply with my obligations as a shareholder of the Company thereunder, and for this purpose, upon request by the WFOE, I shall sign a series of written documents
substantially in the same form and substance as the Transaction Documents. 
 This Consent Letter shall become effective from the date of
signing. 
  

	
	Signature: /s/ Shen Xia
                                    
	
	Name: Shen Xia
	
	Date: July 24, 2020


 SPOUSAL CONSENT LETTER
#### Plett, Respondent, *v.*Willson *et al.,*Appellants.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department*

May 2, 1890.)

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. See 4 N. Y. Supp. 507,
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 75 (Tuesday, April 18, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20839-20840]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9624]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards Spent Fuel 
Project Office; Notice of Issuance and Availability of NUREG-1617 
Standard Review Plan for Transportation Packages for Spent Nuclear Fuel

    The United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has issued 
the final report NUREG-1617, ``Standard Review Plan for Transportation 
Packages for Spent Nuclear Fuel.''
    The Standard Review Plan for Transportation Packages for Spent 
Nuclear Fuel provides guidance to the NRC staff for the review and 
approval of applications for packages used to transport spent nuclear 
fuel under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter 1, Part 
71 (10 CFR Part 71).
    NUREG-1617 is intended for use by the NRC staff. Its objectives are 
to (1) summarize 10 CFR Part 71 requirements for package approval, (2) 
describe the procedures by which the NRC staff determines that these 
requirements have been satisfied, and (3) document the practices 
developed by the staff in reviews of package applications.
    NUREG-1617 is available for inspection, and copying for a fee, at 
the

[[Page 20840]]

NRC Public Document Room, 2120 L Street NW (Lower Level), Washington, 
DC 20555-0001. Copies of NUREG-1617 may be purchased from the 
Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, P.O. Box 
37082, Washington, DC 20402-9328, telephone no. 1-202-512-1800, or the 
National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, 
Springfield, VA 22161, telephone no. 1-800-553-6847. This document is 
also available at the NRC web site, http://www.nrc.gov. See the link 
under ``Technical Reports in the NUREG Series'' on the ``Reference 
Library Page.''

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 31st day of March, 2000.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
M. Wayne Hodges,
Deputy Director, Technical Review Directorate, Spent Fuel Project 
Office, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 00-9624 Filed 4-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
Skip to main content

Privacy Policy•Site map

# Eleni M. Roumel

Judge Roumel was appointed Judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims on February 24, 2020. She served as Chief Judge from October 19, 2020 - March 2, 2021.  She previously served as the Deputy Counsel to Vice President Mike Pence from 2018-2020.  Prior to her tenure at the White House, she served from 2012-2018 as Assistant General Counsel in the U.S. House of Representatives Office of General Counsel.  While serving in the House Office of General Counsel she advised and represented the U.S. House of Representatives, Members of Congress, and congressional staff in federal trial and appellate courts across the country.

Judge Roumel previously was a partner with Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP, in Charleston, South Carolina, and before that practiced at Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, LLP and Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom, LLP in New York City.  She also was an adjunct professor at the Charleston School of Law, where she taught intellectual property law.  Judge Roumel served as a law clerk to the Honorable William H. Pauley III, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, from 2002-2004.  

Judge Roumel received her J.D., magna cum laude, in 2000 from Tulane Law School, where she graduated Order of the Coif and was an editor of the Tulane Law Review.  Judge Roumel also received her M.B.A. from Tulane University's A.B. Freeman School of Business in 2000.  She earned her Bachelor of Arts degree, cum laude, from Wake Forest University in 1996.

Howard T. Markey National Courts Building • 717 Madison Place, NW, Washington, DC 20439 • 202-357-6400