alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2010126EN.01002601.xml

| 22.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 126/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 126/26

---

COMMISSION DECISION

of 21 May 2010

on the establishment of a Register for Biocidal Products

(notified under document C(2010) 3180)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2010/296/EU)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 1998 concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market (1), and in particular Article 18(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | In order to facilitate compliance by the Member States with the requirement to submit the information concerning authorisation and registration of biocidal products set out in Article 18(1) of Directive 98/8/EC, it is appropriate to establish a standardised information system at European Union level, in the form of a Register for Biocidal Products, hereinafter referred to as the ‘Register’. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In order to facilitate compliance by the Member States with the requirement to submit the information concerning authorisation and registration of biocidal products set out in Article 18(1) of Directive 98/8/EC, it is appropriate to establish a standardised information system at European Union level, in the form of a Register for Biocidal Products, hereinafter referred to as the ‘Register’.

| (2) | To ensure consistency of the data, the Register should be used by all the Member States to enter the information required under Article 18(1) of Directive 98/8/EC. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

To ensure consistency of the data, the Register should be used by all the Member States to enter the information required under Article 18(1) of Directive 98/8/EC.

| (3) | As the standardised information system is still under development, it is appropriate to provide for the deferred applicability of this Decision. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

As the standardised information system is still under development, it is appropriate to provide for the deferred applicability of this Decision.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Biocidal Products, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Biocidal Products,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

A Register for Biocidal Products is established.

Article 2

Member States shall enter the information required under Article 18(1) of Directive 98/8/EC into the Register for Biocidal Products.

Article 3

This Decision shall apply from 1 July 2010.

Article 4

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 21 May 2010.

For the Commission

Janez POTOČNIK

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 123, 24.4.1998, p. 1.

1

---
**CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-112457 on Form S-3 of our reports dated March 15, 2005, relating to the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Mpower
Holding Corporation and subsidiaries (which report expresses an unqualified
opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the preparation of the
consolidated financial statements in conformity with AICPA Statement of Position
90-7, “Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization Under the Bankruptcy
Code”), and management’s report of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Mpower
Holding Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2004.

****Date: March 14,
2005
    
    /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE
      LLPDeloitte & Touche LLPRochester, New
York
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Jon A. DeLuca, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FiberNet Telecom Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this
quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the condensed consolidated interim financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying
officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants registered public accounting firm and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 2, 2006



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Jon A. DeLuca            
|Jon A. DeLuca                
|President and                
|Chief Executive Officer      
|(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.01
                                  -------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Bottomline Home Loan, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB Form for the fiscal  year  ending June 30,  2003,  as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Buster Williams, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge and belief:

         (1)  the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
              material   respects,   the  financial   condition  and  result  of
              operations of the Company.



/s/Buster Williams, Jr.
-----------------------
Buster Williams, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
October 14, 2003

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pyramid Breweries Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jason
W. Rees, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ JASON W. REES

Jason W. Rees
Chief Accounting Officer
August 16, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Pyramid Breweries Inc. and will be retained by Pyramid Breweries
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
WAIVER OF EXTRADITION

I, _____________________________________, United States Coast 

Guard, have been advised that I may exercise my rights to formal 

extradition by insisting on my release to the local civil authorities. I have 

been advised of those rights provided for by ______________________

by ________________________________, of 

___________________________________________________________. 

I hereby waive such rights and agree to accompany _________________, 

a representative of the State of _________________, into the territorial 

limits of the State of ______________________. I have been advised that 

the crime(s) with which I have been charged are:

_________________________ _______________________

Accused: Witness

Date: Date:
Exhibit 32
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
 906 OF THE SARBAENES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the Annual Report of Mass Megawatts Wind Power, Inc. (the 'Company') on Form 10-KSB for the year ended April 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the 'Report'), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to such officer's knowledge: Section 13(a)
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of Section 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934: and
 
 (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
 
 In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
 
 Mass Megawatts Wind Power, Inc.Date:   August 9, 2010
By:
/s/   Jonathan RickerJonathan RickerTitle: Chairman, Chief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer and PrincipalAccounting Officer
#### Yupei (Claire) WANG, Appellant, v. WALMART STORES, INC., Appellee.

No. 10-3080.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: June 21, 2011.

Filed: June 24, 2011.

*609Chia-Yu Chang, Chia-Yu Chang Law, P.C., New York, NY, for Appellant.

Yupei (Claire) Wang, Scotch Plains, NJ, pro se.

Kathlyn Graves, Mitchell & Williams, Little Rock, AR, for Appellee.

Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Yupei Wang appeals an order of the District Court1 dismissing her employment-discrimination action. After careful *de novo*review, *see Strand v. Diversified Collection Serv., Inc.,*380 F.3d 316, 317 (8th Cir.2004), we affirm. Wang’s choice-of-law arguments fail because she did not raise them before the District Court, *see St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Compaq Computer Corp.,*539 F.3d 809, 824 (8th Cir.2008), and we agree with the District Court that the Arkansas Civil Rights Act does not provide a cause of action for perceived disabilities, *see Faulkner v. Ark. Children’s Hosp.,*347 Ark. 941, 69 S.W.3d 393, 402 (2002).

Accordingly, we affirm. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Erin Setser, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v *1001Carlton M. Cote, Appellant.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a conviction upon a plea of guilty to burglary in the third degree, arguing that a civilian complainant’s participation in the execution of the search warrant at defendant’s residence rendered the search of his residence illegal, requiring suppression of items seized. We disagree. Testimony adduced at the suppression hearing established that the complainant was taken to defendant’s residence after the police had identified items listed in the search warrant. The complainant merely pointed to items allegedly stolen from her. On these facts, we do not find that such participation invalidated the search *(see, People v Boyd,*123 Misc 2d 634, 640).

We further find that the failure of either the investigator applying for the search warrant or the citizen informant, both of whom appeared before the issuing magistrate, to inform the magistrate of the fact that the informant recently had fought with defendant over a girl did not invalidate the search warrant. Even if the fight had motivated the informant to come forward, he was a citizen informant whose sworn information the magistrate reasonably could credit. There was probable cause to issue the search warrant *(see, People v Hicks,*38 NY2d 90). (Appeal from judgment of Livingston County Court, Houston, J. — burglary, third degree.) Present— Doerr, J. P., Denman, Green, Pine and Schnepp, JJ.
#### PEOPLE ex rel. SINGER MANUF’G CO. v. WEMPLE, Comptroller.

(No. 3.)

(Supreme Court, General Term, Third Department.

May 8, 1894.)

Certiorari by the Singer Manufacturing Company, a foreign corporation, 'to review an assessment of taxes made by Edward Wemple,. comptroller of the city of New York, under the law of the year ending November 1, 1890.

Reversed.

Argued before MAYHAM, P. J., and PUTNAM and HERRICK, JJ.

Lowry, Stone & Auerbach (Julien T. Davies and Wm. A. Poste, of counsel), for relator.

T. E. Hancock, Atty. Gen. (John W. Hogan, Dep. Atty. Gen., of counsel), for respondent.

PUTNAM, J.

I think the determination of the comptroller should be reversed, with the usual costs, for the reasons stated in opinion in case between the same parties, and standing as No. 2 on the calendar. 29 N. Y. Supp. 92.

HERRICK, J., concurs.

MAYHAM, P. J.

(dissenting). This case does not differ essentially from one of the same title argued with this, and standing as No. 2 on the calendar (29 N. Y. Supp. 92), which has been considered and disposed of at this term, and consequently no opinion is required herein. The determination of the comptroller is confirmed, with $50 costs and printing disbursements in favor of the respondent.
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Lawrence E. LUMM, Airman First Class, U.S. Air Force, Appellant.

No. 29,917.

U. S. Court of Military Appeals.

May 23, 1975.

*36
      *Colonel William E. Cordingly*and *Captain Bruce R. Houston*were on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Colonel C. F. Bennett*was on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

In proceedings before a general court-martial composed of members, the appellant was convicted of negligent homicide as well as the possession, use and transfer of heroin in violation of Articles 92 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 892 and 934. He was sentenced by the court to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for 18 months, forfeiture of $250 per month for 18 months, and reduction to pay grade E-l. The convening authority reduced the forfeitures to $200 per month for 18 months in otherwise approving the sentence as adjudged. Following summary affirmance by the United States Air Force Court of Military Review, the appellant petitioned this Court pursuant to Article 67(b)(3), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 867(b)(3).

From our examination of the record, we note that the military judge, during the sentencing portion of the trial, failed to instruct the court that when voting on proposed sentences, it should begin with the lightest proposal and continue in this manner until a sentence was adopted by a concurrence of two-thirds of the members. This failure constitutes reversible error requiring a rehearing on the sentence. *United States v. Johnson,*18 U.S.C.M.A. 436, 40 C.M.R. 148 (1969).1

The decision of the United States Air Force Court of Military Review affirming the sentence is accordingly reversed. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Air Force. A rehearing on sentence may be ordered.

Chief Judge FLETCHER did not participate in the decision of this case.

. *See also United States v. Wright,*20 U.S.C.M.A. 12, 42 C.M.R. 204 (1970); *United States v. Pryor,*19 U.S.C.M.A. 279, 41 C.M.R. 279 (1970).
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DARREN K. EDWARDS,

Appellant,

v.

GUARDIANSHIP OF CARRIE MAE HICKS,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-3283

[October 17, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Mark A. Speiser, Senior Judge; L.T. Case No. PRC 07-

0005967.

Darren K. Edwards, Fort Lauderdale, pro se.

Tieesha N. Taylor of Elderly Care Law Firm, Miami, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, CIKLIN and GERBER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Q.E.P. Co., Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending
February 28, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lewis Gould, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition, and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                               |  |  |  |  |  | 
|---------------------------------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | 
|/s/ Lewis Gould                                |  |  |  |  |  | 
|Lewis Gould                                    |  |  |  |  |  | 
|Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director |  |  |  |  |  | 
|                                               |  |  | 
|May 29, 2007                                   |  |  |  |  |  |
#### Julie McKenna et al., Appellants, v Susan Connors et al., Respondents.

Submitted March 5, 2007;

decided May 3, 2007

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order that affirmed Supreme Court’s order denying the motion to vacate, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
# C_2021459EN.01004401.xml

| 12.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 459/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 459/44

---

EUROPEAN BORDER AND COAST GUARD AGENCY

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2020

(2021/C 459/44)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://frontex.europa.eu/assets/Key_Documents/Final_accounts/FRONTEX_-_Annual_accounts_2020_-_Final.pdf

---
No. 07-14-00028-CR

Ezekiel Will Bell

Appellant

v.

The State of Texas

Appellee §

§

§

§ From the 46th District Court

of Wilbarger County

March 9, 2015

Opinion Per Curiam

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated March 9, 2015

, it is ordered, adjudged

and decreed that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis

, no costs beyond those that

have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o
# CI2021229EN.01000101.xml

| 15.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 229/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 229/1

---

Notice for the attention of certain persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/849 and Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1509 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea

(2021/C 229 I/01)

The following information is brought to the attention of Mr. Ri Pyong Chul (no. 77) appearing in Annex I to Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/849 and Annex XIII to Regulation (EU) 2017/1509 (1), as well as Mr. SO Sang-kuk (no. 6), KIM Yong Chol (no. 7), Mr. HONG Sung-Mu (no. 10), Mr. JO Kyongchol (no. 11), Mr. KIM Rak Kyom (no. 15), Mr. KIM Won-hong (no. 16), Mr. PAK Jong-chon (no. 17), Mr. RI Jong-su (no. 18), Mr. SON Chol-ju (no. 19), Mr. RI Myong Su (no. 24), Mr. SO Hong Chan (no.25), and Yongbyon Nuclear Research Centre (no. 4), persons and entity appearing in section I of Annex II to Decision (CFSP) 2016/849 (2) and in Annex XV to Regulation (EU) 2017/1509 (3), as well as Mr. KIM Tong-un (no. 2) person appearing in section II of Annex II to Decision (CFSP) 2016/849 (4) and in Annex XV to Regulation (EU) 2017/1509 (5) as well as Mr. YUN Chol (no. 6), person appearing in Annex III to Decision (CFSP) 2016/849 and in Annex XVI to Regulation (EU) 2017/1509 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.

The Council intends to maintain the restrictive measures against the above-mentioned persons and entities with new statements of reasons. Those persons are hereby informed that they may submit a request to the Council to obtain the intended statements of reasons for their designation, before 28 June 2021, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1.C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1.C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

---

(1)  OJ L 224, 31.8.2017, p. 1.

(2)  OJ L 141, 28.5.2016, p. 79.

(3)  OJ L 224, 31.8.2017, p. 1.

(4)  OJ L 141, 28.5.2016, p. 79.

(5)  OJ L 224, 31.8.2017, p. 1.

---