alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-85,695-01

EX PARTE JOSE GUADALUPE REYES, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. CR-4153-14-D(1) IN THE 206 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM HIDALGO COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of indecency with

a child and sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment. 

Applicant contends that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he failed to

timely file a notice of appeal, resulting in the dismissal of Applicant’s appeal. Reyes v. State, No.

13-15-00378-CR (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi-Edinburg Sept. 17, 2015).

The trial court has determined that counsel failed to timely file a notice of appeal. We find
2

that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal of the judgment of

conviction in Cause No. CR-4153-14-D(1) from the 206 District Court of Hidalgo County. 

th

Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may give a written notice of appeal so that he

may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal. Within ten days of the issuance of

this opinion, the trial court shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent

and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall immediately appoint an attorney to

represent Applicant on direct appeal. All time limits shall be calculated as if the sentence had been

imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant

desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps to file a written notice of appeal in the

trial court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court issues. Applicant’s other ground is

dismissed. Ex Parte Torres, 943 S.W.2d 469 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division. 

Delivered: October 5, 2016

Do not publish
exv10w6xay






Exhibit 10.6(a)


June 9,
2009




Aspect Capital Ltd.




Nations House — 8th Floor

103 Wigmore Street

London W1U 1QS, U.K.




Attention: Mr. Anthony Todd




	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Re:
	 	Management Agreement Renewals






Dear Mr. Todd:



We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which
reference is made below (the “Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management
Agreements through June 30, 2010 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain
unchanged.





	 	•	 	Citigroup Global Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	Citigroup Diversified 2000 Futures Fund L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	Citigroup Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	CMF Aspect Master Fund L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	CMF Institutional Futures Portfolio LP
	 
	 	•	 	Citigroup Global Futures Fund Ltd.




Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it
to the attention of Ms. Jennifer Magro at the address above or fax to 212-793-1986. If you have any
questions I can be reached at 212-559-5046.




Very truly yours,




CITIGROUP MANAGED FUTURES LLC




	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Jennifer Magro
 

Jennifer Magro
	 	 
	 

	 	Chief Financial Officer & Director	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 







ASPECT CAPITAL LTD.




	 	 	 	 	 
	By: 

Print Name:

	 	/s/ Simon Rocall
 

Simon Rocall
	 	 
	 
	JM/sr
exv10w17






Exhibit 10.17




FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED EXECUTIVE

EMPLOYMENT AND NONCOMPETITION AGREEMENT




     THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AND NONCOMPETITION
AGREEMENT (“First Amendment”), between RSC Equipment Rental, Inc., f/k/a Rental Service Corporation
(the “Company”) and Erik Olsson (“Executive”), is entered into on March •, 2010.



RECITALS:




     WHEREAS, the parties entered into an Amended and Restated Executive Employment and
Noncompetition Agreement on November 28, 2006 (the “Employment Agreement”);



     WHEREAS, Executive and the Company have agreed to a temporary reduction of Executive’s Base
Salary (as defined in the Employment Agreement, and which shall be referred to as the Pre-Reduction
Rate set forth below) through December 31, 2010, with the understanding that all other provisions
of the Employment Agreement shall remain unchanged.



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth,
the adequacy and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Company and Executive agree as
follows:



     1. Executive’s Base Salary
shall be reduced by twenty percent (20%), or $150,000 (the
“Reduction”) for calendar year 2010, from an annual rate of $750,000 (the “Pre-Reduction Rate”) to
an annual rate of $600,000 (the “Post-Reduction Rate”). The Reduction will be applied retroactively
to January 1, 2010, and commencing on March •, 2010, the Reduction will be made in equal
installments from Executive’s compensation paid bi-weekly for the remainder of 2010. Commencing on
January 1, 2011, Executive’s Base Salary shall revert to the Pre-Reduction Rate. Any merit
increases in 2011 shall be based upon the Pre-Reduction Rate.



     2. Executive agrees that the Reduction shall not constitute Good Reason to resign, as defined
under Section 2.5(a) of the Employment Agreement.



 









 





     3. For all purposes under the Employment Agreement other than payment of monthly Base Salary
under Section 2.1 of the Employment Agreement and the calculation of eligible earnings for Variable
Compensation, Base Salary shall be the Pre-Reduction Rate. For example, for the avoidance of doubt,
Severance Benefits (under Section 2.5), if any, shall be calculated based on the Pre-Reduction
Rate.



     Except as modified herein, the terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain
unchanged and in full force and effect.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this First Amendment, or caused this
First Amendment to be duly executed on their respective behalf by their respective duly authorized
officers, all effective as of the date and year first written above.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	RSC EQUIPMENT RENTAL, INC.	 	 	 	EXECUTIVE
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	 	 	 	 	By:	 	 
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Kevin J. Groman
	 	 	 	 	 	Erik Olsson
	 

	 	SVP, General Counsel &

Corporate Secretary	 	 	 	 	 	 






2
trilinkexh4_0.htm


 







Exhibit 4.0


 











 




  





  











  






 


 


 




	FOR VALUE RECEIVED THE UNDERSIGNED DOES HEREBY SELL, ASSIGN AND TRANSFER UNTO:
	 	 	 
	TRANSFEREE:	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY
	(Print Name and Address) 	 	OR TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBER
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	If said number of securities shall not be all the securities evidenced by the within Certificate the undersigned requests that a new Certificate evidencing the securities not so transferred be issued in the name of and delivered to:
	 	 	 
	 	 	PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY
	(Print Name and Address)	 	OR TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBER
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	NOTICE:            The below Transferor signature must correspond with the name as written upon the face of the within Certificate in every particular, without alteration or enlargement or any change whatsoever, or if signed by any other person, the Form of Assignment thereon must be duly executed and if the certificate representing the securities or any certificate representing securities not being exercised is to be registered in a name other than that in which the within Certificate is registered, the signature of the holder hereof must be guaranteed.
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	Dated:                                   
	Transferor Signature	 	 
	 	 	 
	Signature Guaranteed:  ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
	 	 	 
	TRANSFEROR’S SIGNATURE MUST BE GUARANTEED BY A COMMERCIAL BANK OR MEMBER FIRM OF ONE OF THE FOLLOWING STOCK EXCHANGES: NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE, PACIFIC COAST STOCK EXCHANGE, AMERICAN STOCK EXCHANGE, OR MIDWEST STOCK EXCHANGE.
	 	 	 
	THE FOLLOWING MUST BE EXECUTED BY THE TRANSFEREE OF THIS CERTIFICATE BEFORE TRANSFER MAY BE MADE ON THE BOOKS OF THE COMPANY:
	 	 	 
	The undersigned hereby certifies that he is the Transferee of the securities referred to in this Assignment:
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	Dated:                                  
	Transferee Signature	 	 
	 	 	 
	WARNING:  THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1934 AND, ACCORDINGLY, MAY NOT BE OFFERED FOR SALE, SOLD OR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRED EXCEPT (1) UPON EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION OF THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, OR (2) UPON ACCEPTANCE BY THE ISSUER OF AN OPINION OF COUNSEL IN SUCH FORM AND BY SUCH COUNSEL OR OF OTHER DOCUMENTATION AS SATISFACTORY TO COUNSEL FOR THE ISSUER THAT SUCH REGISTRATION IS NOT REQUIRED.
exv10w11wa






Exhibit 10.11(a)


June 9, 2009




SandRidge Capital L.P.

1300 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 325

Houston, Texas 77056


Attention: Mr. Andrew M. Rowe




     Re: Management Agreement Renewal



Dear Mr. Rowe:



We are writing with respect to your management agreement concerning the commodity pool to which
reference is made below (the “Management Agreement”). We are extending the term of the Management
Agreement through June 30, 2010 and all other provisions of the Management Agreement will remain
unchanged.





	 	•	 	Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. II
	 
	 	•	 	SB Bristol Energy Fund LP
	 
	 	•	 	CMF SandRidge Master Fund L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	Bohdan Mysko
	 
	 	•	 	CMF SandRidge Feeder (Cayman) Ltd.
	 
	 	•	 	UDC International
	 
	 	•	 	Citigroup Energy Advisors Portfolio L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	Citigroup Diversified 2000 Futures Fund L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	Citigroup Diversified Futures Fund L.P.




Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it
to the attention of Ms. Jennifer Magro at the address above or fax to 212-793-1986. If you have any
questions I can be reached at 212-559-5046.



Very truly yours,



CITIGROUP MANAGED FUTURES LLC




	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Jennifer Magro
	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Jennifer Magro	 	 
	 

	 	Chief Financial Officer & Director	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	SANDRIDGE CAPITAL, L.P.

	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Andrew M. Rowe	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	Print Name: Andrew M. Rowe	 	 






JM/sr
EXHIBIT 10.14.3

Amendment No. 6 (the "Amendment") To
Employment Agreement (the "Employment Agreement") between
C. Douglas Kranwinkle ("Employee") and Univision Management Co. ("Company")

Employee
and Company agree to amend the Employment Agreement as follows:

1.Term.The Term of the Employment Agreement is extended through December 31,
2007, unless earlier terminated in accordance with the provisions of the Employment Agreement.

2.Salary.The annual Base Salary rate will be Six Hundred Thousand Dollars ($600,000)
for the annual period from January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007.

3.Effective Date of Amendment.Upon execution by Employee and Company, this Amendment
will become effective as of December 31, 2004.

4.Other.Except as provided in this Amendment, all other terms and conditions in the
Employment Agreement will remain in full force and effect, and the Employment Agreement, as amended hereby, is ratified and confirmed.

|                                              |  | UNIVISION MANAGEMENT CO.
|--------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------
|                                              |  | By:                     
|/s/C. DOUGLAS KRANWINKLEC. Douglas Kranwinkle |  |                         

---
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 179 (Monday, September 20, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 52261]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-20402]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, September 23, 2021.

PLACE: The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the 
Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, 
the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend 
the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the 
matters also may be present.
    In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting 
changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, 
and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website 
at https://www.sec.gov.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), 
permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.
    The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the 
following topics:

    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
    Resolution of litigation claims; and
    Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.

    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of 
adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information; please 
contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 
551-5400.

    Dated: September 16, 2021.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-20402 Filed 9-16-21; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5773 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 661
111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5773

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 16, 2010

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

                           November 30, 2010

               Reported by Mrs. Boxer, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the Federal building located at 6401 Security Boulevard in 
      Baltimore, Maryland, commonly known as the Social Security 
  Administration Operations Building, as the ``Robert M. Ball Federal 
                              Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 6401 Security Boulevard in 
Baltimore, Maryland, commonly known as the Social Security 
Administration Operations Building, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Robert M. Ball Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Robert M. Ball 
Federal Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 661

111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5773

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To designate the Federal building located at 6401 Security Boulevard in 
      Baltimore, Maryland, commonly known as the Social Security 
  Administration Operations Building, as the ``Robert M. Ball Federal 
                              Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 30, 2010

                       Reported without amendment
```
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5751 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 29, 2010 

Received 

AUGUST 5, 2010 

Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To provide for the establishment of a task force that will 

be responsible for investigating cases referred to the Attorney General under the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 

1995, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5751 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lobbying Disclosure 

3 Enhancement Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. LOBBYING DISCLOSURE ACT TASK FORCE. 

5 (a) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Attorney General shall 

6 establish the Lobbying Disclosure Act Enforcement Task 

7 Force (in this section referred to as the ‘‘Task Force’’). 

8 (b) FUNCTIONS.—The Task Force— 

9 (1) shall have primary responsibility for inves10 tigating and prosecuting each case referred to the 

11 Attorney General under section 6(a)(8) of the Lob12 bying Disclosure Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1605(a)(8)); 

13 and 

14 (2) shall collect and disseminate information 

15 with respect to the enforcement of the Lobbying Dis16 closure Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.). 

17 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

18 are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be 

19 necessary to carry out this section. 

20 SEC. 3. REFERRAL OF CASES TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL. 

21 Section 6(a) of the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 

22 (2 U.S.C. 1605(a)) is amended— 

23 (1) in paragraph (8), by striking ‘‘United 

24 States Attorney for the District of Columbia’’ and 

25 inserting ‘‘Attorney General’’; and 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 5751 RFS

1 (2) in paragraph (11), by striking ‘‘United 

2 States Attorney for the District of Columbia’’ and 

3 inserting ‘‘Attorney General’’. 

4 SEC. 4. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPROVED ENFORCE5 MENT. 

6 The Attorney General may make recommendations to 

7 Congress with respect to— 

8 (1) the enforcement of and compliance with the 

9 Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995; and 

10 (2) the need for resources available for the en11 hanced enforcement of the Lobbying Disclosure Act 

12 of 1995 

13 SEC. 5. INFORMATION IN ENFORCEMENT REPORTS. 

14 Section 6(b)(1) of the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 

15 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1605(b)(1)) is amended by striking ‘‘by 

16 case’’ and all that follows through ‘‘public record’’ and in17 serting ‘‘by case and name of the individual lobbyists or 

18 lobbying firms involved, any sentences imposed’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 28, 2010. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 15.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the previously filed
Registration Statements on Form S-8 No. 333-12904, of Tikcro Technologies Ltd.
(the "Company") Employee Share Purchase plan and the Company Share Incentive
Plan of our independent auditors' report dated February 9, 2004, relating to the
consolidated financial statements of Tikcro Technologies Ltd. appearing in the
Company's Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003.


                                     /s/ Kost Forer Gabbay and Kasierer

     Tel-Aviv, Israel                        KOST, FORER GABBAY and KASIERER
     June 21, 2004                          A Member of Ernst & Young Global
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Henderson, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Brenda Soloff, J.), rendered on May 28, 1985, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders, 52*AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Asch, Rosenberger and Wallach, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Richard LaBarbera, President and Chief Executive
Officer of Kintera, Inc. (the Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: April 30, 2007



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Richard LaBarbera                
|Richard LaBarbera                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Charles Stager, Respondent.

Memorandum: A notice of appeal from the February 18, 1986 decision order of County Court was not timely filed. The decision order of the court on the motion to reargue was not a superseding order because the People raised no new facts and included no additional affidavits or other proof *(see, People v Brooks,*54 AD2d 333, 337; *People v Caruso,*37 AD2d 532). No appeal lies from the denial of a motion to reargue *(People v Shorts,*33 AD2d 1040). Were we to reach the merits, we would affirm. (Appeals from orders of Onondaga County Court, Burke, J. — dismiss indictment-reargument.) Present— Denman, J. P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ANTON JOHNSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 68 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 25th day of June, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.