alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT      32**

**CERTIFICATE      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND **

**PRINCIPAL      FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE **

**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

|  | 1. | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial results of operations of the                  Company. |
|--|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                                                                        |   |   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Alan                    Doyle                                                                                                                                                      |   |   |   |
|                                                                                                                                                                                             |   |   |   |
| Alan                      DoylePresident                      (Chief Executive Officer),Treasurer                      (Principal Financial Officer)September                      19, 2006 |   |   |        |

----
1

The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of

Minnesota.

2

The substance of former subsection (e) is now found in subsection (g), with

stylistic changes. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 41 advisory committee notes (2002 amend.).

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 03-2700

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

Freddie Ross, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: April 26, 2004

Filed: May 3, 2004

___________

Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Federal inmate Freddie Ross appeals the district court’s1

 partial denial of his

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(e)2

 motion for return of seized property, which

included $8,400 in cash and several noncash items. We have carefully reviewed the
-2-

record, and we find no clear error. See United States v. Felici, 208 F.3d 667, 669-70

(8th Cir. 2000) (standard of review), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1201 (2001). Police

found the $8,400 inside Ross’s girlfriend’s bedroom closet, Ross initially denied any

knowledge of the cash, and he later told police the cash belonged to a Vikings

football player. In addition, Ross’s attorney conceded during the Rule 41 hearing that

the motion was moot with respect to the seized noncash items. 

The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2458 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

5351 Lapalco Boulevard in Marrero, Louisiana, as the ‘‘Lionel R. Collins, 

Sr. Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 19, 2015 

Mr. RICHMOND (for himself and Mr. SCALISE) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 5351 Lapalco Boulevard in Marrero, Louisiana, as the ‘‘Lionel R. Collins, Sr. Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIONEL R. COLLINS, SR. POST OFFICE BUILD4 ING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 5351 Lapalco Boulevard in 

7 Marrero, Louisiana, shall be known and designated as the 

8 ‘‘Lionel R. Collins, Sr. Post Office Building’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2458 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lionel R. Collins, Sr. 

5 Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Listen

# Lucy McBath

## U.S. Representative and CSSBMB Commissioner

Commissioner McBath has sought bipartisan solutions to end gun violence, uplift small business and our economy, protect and serve our nation’s veterans, and lower the cost of healthcare and prescription drugs. Commissioner McBath knows how important it is to protect those with preexisting conditions and ensure all Americans have access to quality, affordable care. She also, made protecting small businesses a priority, supporting legislation like the Paycheck Protection Program, provide more funding for SBA disaster lending, and ensure that more small businesses have access to the money they need. McBath left her 30-year career as a flight attendant to become the national spokesperson and faith and outreach leader for Everytown for Gun Safety and Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America.

-  Our Mission 
-  Commissioners 
-  Offices and Staff 
-  Careers 
-  Acquisition Opportunities 
-  Rankin Memorial Library 
-  FAQs
ContiFinancial Corporation
Calculation of Earnings Per Share
For the three months ended December 31, 1999


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                                     <C>
Basic and Diluted Computation for the three months ended December 31,1999

Weighted average shares outstanding:

  Common stock excluding shares relating to employee incentive plans       46,153,195

  Vested Restricted Shares Outstanding during the Quarter                     391,941
                                                                        -------------
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding                                        46,545,136
                                                                        -------------
Quarter income (loss)                                                       ($114,605)
                                                                        -------------
Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share                                           ($2.46)
                                                                        =============
</TABLE>
Kathryn Tassinari

Mark Manning

HARDER, WELLS, BARON & MANNING, P.C.

474 Willamette Street

Eugene, OR 97401

(541) 686-1969

kathrynt50@comcast.net

Of Attorneys for the Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

BRANDON T. BEYERLIN, )

) Case No. 6:15-cv-01434-SI

Plaintiff, ) 

vs. ) 

) ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY

COMMISSIONER, ) FEES PURSUANT TO EAJA

Social Security Administration , ) 

) 

____________Defendant._______________)

It is hereby ORDERED that attorney fees in the amount of $10,730.66 are hereby

awarded to Plaintiff, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412.

Payment of this award shall be paid via check made payable to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff’s

attorneys at Harder, Wells, Baron & Manning, P.C., 474 Willamette Street, Eugene, Oregon

97401. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, the award shall be made payable to Plaintiff’s attorney

unless the Commissioner confirms that Plaintiff owes a debt to the government through the

Federal Treasury Offset program. There are no costs or expenses to be paid herein.

Dated this day of __________, 2018.

______________________________

U.S. District Judge

PRESENTED BY:

Kathryn Tassinari

Harder, Wells, Baron & Manning, P.C.

Of Attorneys for Plaintiff

3rd October 

/s/ Michael H. Simon
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1999             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999             APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                           9,470                  41,835
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   54,911                 117,391
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (37,333)                (54,191)
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               150,956                 130,158
<PP&E>                                          14,560                  59,123
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,270)                (13,634)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 253,351                 406,131
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,791                  39,764
<BONDS>                                        100,000                 100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           327                     331
<OTHER-SE>                                      93,909                 241,459
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   253,351                 406,131
<SALES>                                         60,664                  84,193
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                60,664                  84,193
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                69,180                  72,753
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,619                   1,839
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,135)                   9,601
<INCOME-TAX>                                        50                   3,148
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,185)                   6,453
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,185)                   6,453
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.33)                    0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.33)                    0.20


</TABLE>
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1973 

To require the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to retain and redistribute 

certain amounts collected as fines. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 22, 2015 

Mrs. LOWEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To require the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to retain 

and redistribute certain amounts collected as fines. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF FUNDS. 

4 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission shall retain 

5 amounts collected for safety-related fines, and shall dis6 tribute those amounts to counties for maintaining radio7 logical emergency preparedness plans required in connec8 tion with the nuclear facility with respect to which the 

9 fines were collected. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2620 

To amend the United States Cotton Futures Act to exclude certain cotton 

futures contracts from coverage under such Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 2, 2015 

Mr. DAVID SCOTT of Georgia (for himself, Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia, Mr. 

WESTMORELAND, and Mr. BISHOP of Georgia) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the United States Cotton Futures Act to exclude 

certain cotton futures contracts from coverage under 

such Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXCLUDING CERTAIN COTTON FUTURES CON4 TRACTS FROM COVERAGE UNDER UNITED 

5 STATES COTTON FUTURES ACT. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c)(1) of the United 

7 States Cotton Futures Act (7 U.S.C. 15B(c)(1)) is amend8 ed— 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2620 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘except that any cotton futures 

2 contract’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘except that— 

3 ‘‘(A) any cotton futures contract’’; and 

4 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub5 paragraph: 

6 ‘‘(B) any cotton futures contract that per7 mits tender of cotton grown outside of the 

8 United States is excluded from the coverage of 

9 this paragraph and section to the extent that 

10 the cotton grown outside of the United States 

11 is tendered for delivery under the cotton futures 

12 contract.’’. 

13 (b) APPLICATION.—The amendments made by sub14 section (a) shall apply with respect to cotton futures con15 tracts entered into on or after the date of the enactment 

16 of this Act. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1 The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United St ates District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 05-1516

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Northern District of Iowa. Seth Zimmerman, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: April 7, 2006 Filed: April 11, 2006

___________ Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Seth Zimmerman appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed following revocation of his supervised release. We affirm.
While on supervised release, Zimmerman admittedly tested positive for methamphetamine on five different occasi ons. Noting the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 3583(g)(4) (if defendant, as part of drug testing, tests positive for illegal controlled substance more than 3 times over course of 1 year, court shall revoke supervised-2- release and require defendant to serve te rm of imprisonment), the district court revoked Zimmerman’s supervised release and sentenced him to 18 months’ imprisonment and 18 months’ supervised release.
On appeal, Zimmerman argues that the district court failed to consider whether he qualified for a substance-abuse treatment option as an exception to mandatory revocation. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d) (court shall consider whether availability of appropriate substance-abuse treatment pr ograms, or individual’s current or past participation in such progr ams, warrants exception in accordance with Guidelines from rule of § 3583(g) when considering any action against defe ndant who fails drug test). We reject this argument. At senten cing, the district court asked the parties for their views as to whether they would dispute the application of the mandatory revocation provision. Based on their responses, which revealed that Zimmerman’s drug problem took a turn for the worse while he was at a low-security facility and during his supervised release, and that he failed to benefit from the treatment that was provided to him, the court imposed an 18-month prison sentence which would allow him to participate in a long-term residen tial drug-treatment program while confined. We conclude the court did not abuse its discretion. See United States v. Hammonds , 370 F.3d 1032, 1038-39 (10th Cir. 2004) (standard of review; finding no abuse of discretion where court did not make specifi c ruling rejecting application of § 3583(d), because there was no indication court did not recognize its power to grant exception: at sentencing defendant requested order di recting treatment rather than revocation, government noted defendant’s poor record in treatment programs, and court ordered revocation with in-prison treatment); cf. United States v. Pierce , 132 F.3d 1207, 1207- 09 (8th Cir. 1997) (remanding where district court’s statements at revocation hearing cast doubt on whether it realized it could order drug treatment as alternative to revocation).
Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________
Exhibit 15
 
 
 
 **CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-61638 of Enodis plc on Form S-8 of our report dated November 22, 2004 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to the differences between accounting principles generally accepted in the United Kingdom and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the effect that the application of the latter would have on the determination of profit/(loss) and equity shareholders funds, relating to convenience translations for the translation of pounds sterling amounts into U.S. dollar amounts presented solely for the convenience of readers in the United States of America and the adoptions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets and Urgent Issues Task Force Abstract 38 Accounting for ESOP trusts), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Enodis plc for the year ended October 2, 2004.
 
 
 /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
 
 London, England
 December 21, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                               (44,122)   
<SECURITIES>                                               0    
<RECEIVABLES>                                     50,411,549    
<ALLOWANCES>                                       2,285,057    
<INVENTORY>                                                0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  48,082,370    
<PP&E>                                             3,833,763    
<DEPRECIATION>                                     1,878,354    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    58,201,678    
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              1,816,897    
<BONDS>                                                    0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0    
<PREFERRED>                                                0    
<COMMON>                                              39,264    
<OTHER-SE>                                         6,543,975    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      58,201,678    
<SALES>                                                    0    
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   4,183,873    
<CGS>                                                      0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      2,971,137    
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           0    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     729,767    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 1,056,901    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      482,969    
<INCOME-TAX>                                         168,693    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  314,276    
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0    
<CHANGES>                                                  0    
<NET-INCOME>                                         314,276    
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            .08    
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            .08    
                                              


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**PERICOM
      SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION**





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with this quarterly report of Pericom Semiconductor Corporation
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 29, 2008 (the
“Report”), I, Alex C. Hui, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
      certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
      Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
      knowledge:




(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and


(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
      and for the periods indicated.





May
      7,
      2008




By:
            /s/
                Alex C. HuiAlex
                C. HuiChief
                Executive OfficerPericom
                Semiconductor Corporation
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2394 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2394

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 10, 2015

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, 
                        Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To reauthorize the National Forest Foundation Act, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Forest Foundation 
Reauthorization Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. NATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION ACT REAUTHORIZATION.

    (a) Extension of Authority To Provide Matching Funds for 
Administrative and Project Expenses.--Section 405(b) of the National 
Forest Foundation Act (16 U.S.C. 583j-3(b)) is amended by striking 
``for a period of five years beginning October 1, 1992'' and inserting 
``during fiscal years 2016 through 2018''.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 410(b) of the 
National Forest Foundation Act (16 U.S.C. 583j-8(b)) is amended by 
striking ``during the five-year period'' and all that follows through 
``$1,000,000 annually'' and inserting ``there are authorized to be 
appropriated $3,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2016 through 2018''.
    (c) Technical Corrections.--
            (1) Agent.--Section 404(b) of the National Forest 
        Foundation Act (16 U.S.C. 583j-2(b)) is amended by striking 
        ``under this paragraph'' and inserting ``by subsection 
        (a)(4)''.
            (2) Annual report.--Section 407(b) of the National Forest 
        Foundation Act (16 U.S.C. 583j-5(b)) is amended by striking the 
        comma after ``The Foundation shall''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 9, 2015.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```