alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

_________________________________

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD,

Complainant

vs.

LUKE ANDREW LUCAS,

Respondent.

_________________________________

Docket Number 2023-0377

Enforcement Activity No. 7781014

CONSENT ORDER

Issued: December 28, 2023

By Administrative Law Judge: Honorable Timothy G. Stueve

Appearances:

CWO Michael E. Leathers

Sector New York

For the Coast Guard

Luke Andrew Lucas, Pro Se

For Respondent
CONSENT ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

On or about November 30, 2023, the parties in this case submitted a Motion for Approval 

of Settlement Agreement and Entry of Consent Order to be approved as a settlement of the case 

under 33 C.F.R. § 20.502.

I have carefully reviewed the terms of the Settlement Agreement and find it is fair and 

reasonable and in substantial compliance with the requirements of 33 C.F.R. § 20.502.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the record, it is hereby ORDERED, the Settlement Agreement is 

APPROVED in full and incorporated herein by reference. This Consent Order shall constitute 

full, final, and complete adjudication of this proceeding.

Done and dated December 28, 2023, at

Alameda, California

 

_____________________

Honorable Timothy G. Stueve

Administrative Law Judge

U.S. Coast Guard
#### In re TAYLOR ST. In the matter of the opening of Taylor street.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

April, 1896.)

No opinion. Order reversed, with disbursements allowed to appellant.
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



          In connection with the Quarterly Report of Blount International,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, James S. Osterman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer's knowledge:

      (i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the report.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Blount International, Inc. and will be retained by Blount
International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.


Date: November 19, 2004


/s/ James S. Osterman
-----------------------------
James S. Osterman
President and
Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 178 (Friday, September 17, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 51832]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-20090]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

44 CFR Parts 77, 78, 79, 80, 201, and 206

[Docket ID FEMA-2019-0011]
RIN 1660-AA96


FEMA's Hazard Mitigation Assistance and Mitigation Planning 
Regulations; Correction

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland 
Security (DHS).

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On September 10, 2021, FEMA published in the Federal Register 
a final rule revising the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Hazard 
Mitigation Assistance and mitigation planning regulations to reflect 
current statutory authority and agency practice. This final rule 
corrects the effective date of this rule to read October 1, 2021.

DATES: This correction is effective September 17, 2021.

ADDRESSES: The docket for this rulemaking is available for inspection 
using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov and 
can be viewed by following that website's instructions.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katherine Fox, Assistant Administrator 
for Mitigation, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 202-646-1046, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9ad1fbeef2ffe8f3f4ffb4dcf5e2afdafcfff7fbb4fef2e9b4fdf5ec"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2e654f5a464b5c47404b006841561b6e484b434f004a465d00494158">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 2021-19186, beginning on page 
50653 in the Federal Register of Friday, September 10, 2021, the 
following correction is made:
    1. On page 50653, in the first column, ``DATES: This rule is 
effective October 12, 2021.'' is corrected to read ``DATES: This rule 
is effective October 1, 2021.''

Deanne B. Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2021-20090 Filed 9-16-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-11-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Capital Growth Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Patrick C. Shutt, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, Jim McDevitt, the Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of
the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to l8 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated: August 13, 2009



By:

/s/ Patrick C. ShuttPatrick C. Shutt, Chief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/ Jim McDevittJim McDevitt, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The
foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as an exhibit to the Report and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF EGL, INC. FOR THE 9 MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          19,977
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  137,631
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,184
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               163,011
<PP&E>                                          40,446
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,822
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 243,785
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           70,596
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            30
<OTHER-SE>                                     166,734
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   243,785
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               589,855
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  346,695
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               205,711
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 39,194
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,495
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    23,699
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.79


</TABLE>
#### Paul Albert GUARDADO, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Margarita PEREZ, Chairwoman, California Board of Prison Terms; Jeanne S. Woodford, Director, California Department of Corrections; A.P. Kane, Warden, Respondents-Appellants.

No. 09-17832.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 14, 2011.*

Filed April 25, 2011.

*771Kent George Washburn, Orinda, CA, for Petitioner-Appellee.

Jessica Nicole Blonien, Andrew R. Woodrow, Office of the California Attorney-General, Sacramento, CA, for Respondents-Appellants.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN and TROTT, Circuit Judges, and CAMPBELL, District Judge.**

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable Tena Campbell, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Utah, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

This is an appeal from the district court’s grant of habeas relief. As the facts are familiar to the parties, we repeat them here only as necessary to explain our decision. After much litigation, the California Board of Parole granted Paul Albert Guardado’s parole application. Governor Schwarzenegger then vetoed that determination. The district court granted Guardado’s habeas application and ordered his release, determining that Governor Schwarzenegger’s veto violated California’s “some evidence” requirement. Under then-binding Ninth Circuit precedent, this amounted to a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause. *See, e.g., Pirtle v. Cal. Bd. of Prison Terms,*611 F.3d 1015, 1020-21 (9th Cir. 2010).

The Supreme Court subsequently held that reviewing California parole decisions for compliance with California’s “some evidence” standard “is no part of the Ninth Circuit’s business.” *Swarthout v. Cooke,*— U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 859, 863, 178 L.Ed.2d 732 (2011), *reversing sub nom., Cooke v. Solis,*606 F.3d 1206 (9th Cir. 2010). Instead, the Court reaffirmed its previous holding that the U.S. Constitution affords parole applicants only “minimal” due process: an opportunity to be heard and a statement of reasons why parole was denied. *Id.*at 862 (citing *Greenholtz v. Inmates of Neb. Penal & Corr. Complex,*442 U.S. 1, 99 S.Ct. 2100, 60 L.Ed.2d 668 (1979)); *see also Pearson v. Muntz,*639 F.3d 1185, 1191 (9th Cir.2011). These rights were clearly afforded to Guardado. Accordingly, his due process rights were not violated. Since the petition may easily be denied on the merits, we do not decide whether Guardado properly exhausted his state court remedies. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(2).1

REVERSED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

1

. Guardado moved to stay this appeal pending the reconsideration motion in *Swarthout.**772Because the Supreme Court has since denied that motion, we deny Guardado’s request for a stay as moot.
#### *In re*Demelt.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department.*

May 2, 1890.)

No opinion. Decree of surrogate affirmed, with costs to the respondent, payable out of the estate.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 15D-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of ACE*COMM Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such
disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused
such disclosure
controls and procedures
to be designed under
our supervision, to
ensure that material
information relating to
the registrant,
including its
consolidated
subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others
within those entities,
particularly during the
period in which this
report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the
effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure
controls and procedures
and presented in this
report our conclusions
about the effectiveness
of the disclosure
controls and
procedures, as of the
end of the period
covered by this report
based on such
evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this
report any change in
the registrants
internal control over
financial reporting
that occurred during
the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter
in the case of an
annual report) that has
materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the
registrants internal
control over financial
reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants Board of Directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions:
 (a)
    
    All significant
deficiencies and
material weaknesses in
the design or operation
of internal control
over financial
reporting which are
reasonably likely to
adversely affect the
registrants ability to
record, process,
summarize and report
financial information;
and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or
not material, that
involves management or
other employees who
have a significant role
in the registrants
internal control over
financial reporting.
 September 28, 2007/s/ Steven R. DelmarSteven R. Delmar,Principal Financial Officer
(September 22, 1987)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Sheldon Simon, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Rettinger, J.), rendered on October 7, 1986, unanimously affirmed. The case is remitted to the Supreme Court, New York County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5). No opinion. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Sandler, Sullivan and Kassal, JJ.
EXHIBIT 31.1


CERTIFICATION






I,  Ray A. Smith, certify that:





1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Trycera Financial, Inc.;




2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known


to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the


period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual


report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and




5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of


directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,


summarize and report financial information; and




b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.









Date: April 20, 2011
By:
Ray A. SmithRay A. SmithTrycera Financial, Inc.CEO and PrincipalExecutive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         554,019
<SECURITIES>                                    10,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,878,224
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,269,279
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,784,290
<PP&E>                                       2,720,566
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,308,148
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,425,143
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,251,144
<BONDS>                                      3,940,124
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,256
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,107,397
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,425,143
<SALES>                                      1,416,104
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,416,104
<CGS>                                        1,004,405
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,004,405
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,078,762
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (29,158)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (696,221)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (696,221)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (696,221)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 10.30

                           SEVENTH ADDENDUM TO LEASE


This Seventh Addendum To Lease is made and entered into the 16th day of June
1999, between Conifer Prince Street Associates (Landlord) and Patient
Infosystems, Inc. formerly DSMI Corporation (Tenant).

WITNESSETH: that Tenant currently leases and occupies approximately 12,954
square feet of office space at 46 Prince Street, Rochester, New York 14607
pursuant to a Lease Agreement and First, Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth and Sixth
Addenda To Lease, dated February 22, 1995; August 18, 1995; November 17, 1995;
March 28, 1996; October 29, 1996, November 30, 1996 and November 24, 1997,
respectively.

WHEREAS, Tenant and Landlord desire to extend the Term of the Lease until
December 31, 2000.

NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed upon by Landlord and Tenant to modify
certain provisions of the Lease as follows:

1.       Effective upon full execution of this Seventh Addendum To Lease, the
         Term of the Lease shall be extended from November 30, 1999 to December
         31, 2000.

2.       Tenant agrees to pay, Base Rent for its' leased premises, consisting of
         approximately 12,954 square feet, as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                             Annual
                Period                      Per Sq.ft.           Monthly
            Month-to-Month                  Base Rent            Base Rent
            ----------------                ---------            ---------
<S>                                        <C>               <C>
         12/1/1999-12/31/2000                $14.50              $15,652.76
</TABLE>

3.       Effective upon full execution of this Seventh Addendum To Lease, and as
         consideration for Landlord's consent to extend the Term of the Lease,
         as stated above, Section 5, of the First Addendum To Lease and Section
         33, " First Right To Lease" , of the Lease Agreement shall become null
         and void.

         Except as modified above, all other terms and conditions of the Lease
         Agreement and First, Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Addenda To
         Lease, dated February 22, 1995; August 18, 1995; November 17, 1995;
         March 28, 1996; October 29, 1996 and November 30, 1996 and November 24,
         1997, respectively, shall remain unchanged and in full force and
         effect.

         Agreed to by:                          Agreed to by:

         PATIENT INFOSYSTEMS, INC.              CONIFER PRINCE STREET ASSOCIATES
         formerly DSMI CORPORATION

          By:  /s/ J.V. Crisan                  By:  /s/ Thomas L. Fountain
             ---------------------------           -------------------------
                   J.V. Crisan                            Thomas L. Fountain

                                                VP Conifer Realty Corporation
                                                as agent

          Date June 16, 1999                    Date June 16, 1999
             ---------------------------           -------------------------