alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Ernesto Bertarelli, the Vice-Chairman of the Board, Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of Serono S.A. (the "Company"), has
executed this certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company's Annual Report on Form 20-F for the Fiscal Year ended
December 31, 2005 (the "Report").

The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

|                        |  |  |                                                                          
|----------------------- |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  |  | /s/ERNESTO BERTARELLI                                                    
|                        |  |  | Ernesto Bertarelli                                                       
|Date: February 28, 2006 |  |  | Vice-Chairman of the Board,
Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer

---



QuickLinks
# C_2021322EN.01000301.xml

| 11.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 322/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 322/3

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10425 — BCP Dornoch Parent/DexKo)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 322/03)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | BCP Dornoch Parent Inc. (‘BCP’, USA), controlled by Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (USA), |
| --- | --- |

—

BCP Dornoch Parent Inc. (‘BCP’, USA), controlled by Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (USA),

| — | DexKo Global Holdings Inc. (‘DexKo’, USA), controlled by KPS Capital Partners, LP (USA). |
| --- | --- |

—

DexKo Global Holdings Inc. (‘DexKo’, USA), controlled by KPS Capital Partners, LP (USA).

BCP acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of DexKo.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | BCP is controlled by Brookfield Asset Management Inc., a global asset manager that offers a range of public and private investment products and services, with a focus on real estate, infrastructure, renewable power and private equity, |
| --- | --- |

—

BCP is controlled by Brookfield Asset Management Inc., a global asset manager that offers a range of public and private investment products and services, with a focus on real estate, infrastructure, renewable power and private equity,

| — | DexKo is a supplier of engineered running gear technology, chassis assemblies and related components. DexKo sells axle assemblies, chassis, suspension and related components and other components for a range of trailer and other towable end-products. |
| --- | --- |

—

DexKo is a supplier of engineered running gear technology, chassis assemblies and related components. DexKo sells axle assemblies, chassis, suspension and related components and other components for a range of trailer and other towable end-products.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10425 — BCP Dornoch Parent/DexKo

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       4,181,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               15,372,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   762,000
<INVENTORY>                                    873,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            24,103,000
<PP&E>                                       8,751,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,534,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              29,654,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,233,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       159,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  69,019,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                29,654,000
<SALES>                                     12,775,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,775,000
<CGS>                                        4,251,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,251,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            16,288,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (7,722,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   357,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (7,365,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (7,365,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.46)
        


</TABLE>
# C_2023100EN.01014501.xml

| 16.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 100/145 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 100/145

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on ‘Proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EU) No 389/2012 as regards the exchange of information maintained in the electronic registers concerning economic operators who move excise goods between Member States for commercial purposes’

(COM(2022) 539 final — 2022/0331 (CNS))

(2023/C 100/22)

| Referral | Council of the European Union, 27.10.2022 |
| --- | --- |
| Legal basis | Articles 113 and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union |
| Section responsible | Economic and Monetary Union and Economic and Social Cohesion |
| Adopted at plenary | 14.12.2022 |
| Plenary session No | 574 |
| Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions) | 209/0/3 |

Referral

Council of the European Union, 27.10.2022

Legal basis

Articles 113 and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Section responsible

Economic and Monetary Union and Economic and Social Cohesion

Adopted at plenary

14.12.2022

Plenary session No

574

Outcome of vote

(for/against/abstentions)

209/0/3

Since the Committee endorses the content of proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EU) No 389/2012 as regards the exchange of information maintained in the electronic registers concerning economic operators who move excise goods between Member States for commercial purposes (1) and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 574th plenary session of 14 and 15 December 2022, (meeting of 14 December 2022), by 209 votes with 3 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 14 December 2022.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Christa SCHWENG

---

(1)  COM(2022) 539 final.

1

---
# C_2021059EN.01000701.xml

| 19.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 59/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 59/7

---

Commission notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates applicable as from 1 March 2021

(Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 (1))

(2021/C 59/06)

Base rates calculated in accordance with the Communication from the Commission on the revision of the method for setting the reference and discount rates (OJ C 14, 19.1.2008, p. 6.). Depending on the use of the reference rate, the appropriate margins have still to be added as defined in this communication. For the discount rate this means that a margin of 100 basis points has to be added. The Commission Regulation (EC) No 271/2008 of 30 January 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 foresees that, unless otherwise provided for in a specific decision, the recovery rate will also be calculated by adding 100 basis points to the base rate.

Modified rates are indicated in bold.

Previous table published in OJ C 30, 27.1.2021, p. 4.

| From | To | AT | BE | BG | CY | CZ | DE | DK | EE | EL | ES | FI | FR | HR | HU | IE | IT | LT | LU | LV | MT | NL | PL | PT | RO | SE | SI | SK | UK |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.3.2021 | ... | -0,45 | -0,45 | 0,00 | -0,45 | 0,44 | -0,45 | 0,04 | -0,45 | -0,45 | -0,45 | -0,45 | -0,45 | 0,22 | 0,80 | -0,45 | -0,45 | -0,45 | -0,45 | -0,45 | -0,45 | -0,45 | 0,15 | -0,45 | 2,07 | -0,02 | -0,45 | -0,45 | 0,11 |
| 1.2.2021 | 28.2.2021 | -0,45 | -0,45 | 0,00 | -0,45 | 0,44 | -0,45 | 0,05 | -0,45 | -0,45 | -0,45 | -0,45 | -0,45 | 0,22 | 0,80 | -0,45 | -0,45 | -0,45 | -0,45 | -0,45 | -0,45 | -0,45 | 0,19 | -0,45 | 2,07 | -0,02 | -0,45 | -0,45 | 0,12 |
| 1.1.2021 | 31.1.2021 | -0,45 | -0,45 | 0,00 | -0,45 | 0,44 | -0,45 | 0,06 | -0,45 | -0,45 | -0,45 | -0,45 | -0,45 | 0,22 | 0,80 | -0,45 | -0,45 | -0,45 | -0,45 | -0,45 | -0,45 | -0,45 | 0,23 | -0,45 | 2,07 | 0,00 | -0,45 | -0,45 | 0,15 |

From

To

AT

BE

BG

CY

CZ

DE

DK

EE

EL

ES

FI

FR

HR

HU

IE

IT

LT

LU

LV

MT

NL

PL

PT

RO

SE

SI

SK

UK

1.3.2021

...

-0,45

-0,45

0,00

-0,45

0,44

-0,45

0,04

-0,45

-0,45

-0,45

-0,45

-0,45

0,22

0,80

-0,45

-0,45

-0,45

-0,45

-0,45

-0,45

-0,45

0,15

-0,45

2,07

-0,02

-0,45

-0,45

0,11

1.2.2021

28.2.2021

-0,45

-0,45

0,00

-0,45

0,44

-0,45

0,05

-0,45

-0,45

-0,45

-0,45

-0,45

0,22

0,80

-0,45

-0,45

-0,45

-0,45

-0,45

-0,45

-0,45

0,19

-0,45

2,07

-0,02

-0,45

-0,45

0,12

1.1.2021

31.1.2021

-0,45

-0,45

0,00

-0,45

0,44

-0,45

0,06

-0,45

-0,45

-0,45

-0,45

-0,45

0,22

0,80

-0,45

-0,45

-0,45

-0,45

-0,45

-0,45

-0,45

0,23

-0,45

2,07

0,00

-0,45

-0,45

0,15

---

(1)  OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1.

---
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JESUS CABRALES,

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00199-CR

Appeal from

346thDistrict Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20160D04939)

O R D E R

The record before us does not contain the trial court’s certification of the defendant’s right 

of appeal. TEX.R.APP.P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). The trial court is ordered to prepare and file with the trial 

court clerk within thirty days from the date of this order a certification of the defendant’s right of 

appeal as required by TEX.R.APP.P. 25.2(a)(2) and 25.2(d). The trial court clerk shall prepare a 

supplemental clerk’s record containing the certification and file it with this Court no later than 

October 5, 2019.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 21st day of August, 2019.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
#### Gouverneur et *al.,*Appellants, *v.*National Ice Co. of New York, Respondent.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.*

May 12, 1890.)

No opinion. Reargument ordered.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 74 (Monday, April 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 20436]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9414]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE


Office of the Secretary of Defense; Meeting of the DOD Advisory 
Group on Electron Devices

AGENCY: Advisory Group on Electron Devices, Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The DoD Advisory Group on Electron Devices (AGED) announces a 
closed session meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held at 0900, Wednesday, May 24, 2000.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Palisades Institute for Research 
Services, 1745 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22202.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Eliot Cohen, AGED Secretariat, 
1745 Jefferson Davis Highway, Crystal Square Four, Suite 500, 
Arlington, Virginia 22202.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The mission of the Advisory Group is to 
provide advice to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Technology, to the Director of Defense Research and Engineering 
(DDR&E), and through the DDR&E to the Director, Defense Advanced 
Research Projects Agency and the Military Departments in planning and 
managing an effective and economical research and development program 
in the area of electron devices.
    The AGED meeting will be limited to review of research and 
development programs which the Military Departments propose to initiate 
with industry, universities or in their laboratories. The agenda for 
this meeting will include programs on Radiation Hardened Devices, 
Microwave Tubes, Displays and Lasers. The review will include details 
of classified defense programs throughout.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of Pub. L. No. 92-463, as amended, 
(5 U.S.C. App. Sec. 10(d) (1994)) it has been determined that this 
Advisory Group meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) 
(1994), and that accordingly, this meeting will be closed to the 
public.

    Dated: April 11, 2000.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate, OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 00-9414 Filed 4-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         April 26, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         1 pm to 5 pm.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Sheraton University City Hotel Philadelphia, 36th and Chestnut Streets, Philadelphia, PA 19104-5939.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Sheila O'Malley, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Room 6138, MSC 9606, Bethesda, MD 20892-9606, 301-443-6470.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientist Development Award, Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: April 11, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. 

[FR Doc. 00-9723  Filed 4-18-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

VALLEY FORGE, INC.,

 

 Appellant,

v.

CK CONSTRUCTION, INC.,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-22-00084-CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 3

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2021DCV3705)

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is Appellant’s motion to extend abatement on appeal. The 

motion is GRANTED, and the appeal is abated until February 3, 2023, to give the parties an 

opportunity to settle the dispute. If the parties are able to finalize a settlement prior to February 

3, 2023, the parties are directed to notify the Court of that fact and to file an appropriate motion 

to dispose of this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 30th day of January, 2023.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 28, 2011 

y1219 

Order 

 

December 28, 2011 

143523 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 143523 

 COA: 303875 

Hillsdale CC: 10-342203-FH 

LAURIE LAINE HARDWAY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 24, 2011 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUN FU LI, Petitioner,

v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent. No. 12-73113 Agency No. A079-543-613

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted October 22, 2015 ** San Francisco, California Before: PAEZ, MURGUIA, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges. Jun Fu Li petitions for review from an order of the Board of Im migration Appeals (“BIA”) denying his motion to reopen removal proceeding s. We deny the petition in part and dismiss it in part.

1. The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Li’s concededl y

* This disposition is not approp riate for publication and is no t precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for dec ision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

OCT 26 2015 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 untimely motion to reopen. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)( i). The BIA properly

determined that Li’s failure to file a new asylum application w as fatal to his motion. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(1) (“A motion to reopen proceedin gs for the purpose of submitting an application for relief must be accompanied by the appropriate application for relief and a ll supporting documentation.”); see also Young Sun Shin v. Mukasey , 547 F.3d 1019, 1025 (9th Cir. 2008) (affirming BIA’s denial o f motion to reopen because petiti oner failed to present evidence of an approved visa as required to establish “prima facie eligibility for the relie f sought”).

2. We lack jurisdiction to consider Li’s challenge to the BIA’s d ecision not to invoke its sua sponte aut hority to reopen removal procee dings. Sharma v.

Holder , 633 F.3d 865, 874 (9th Cir. 2011).

PETITION DENIED IN PART , DISMISSED IN PART.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Luis Padilla, Appellant.

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Scholnick, J.), rendered March 25, 1982, convicting him of murder in the second degree, burglary in the first degree and criminal use of a firearm in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress statements made by him to law enforcement authorities.

*354Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We find that the defendant’s arrest violated "[n]either the letter nor the spirit of the *Payton [Payton v New York,*445 US 573] rule” *(People v Minley,*68 NY2d 952, 953).

Further, the People did establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant’s statements were voluntary. That the police failed to scrupulously honor the defendant’s right to remain silent was not raised at the hearing and therefore the issue is not preserved for our review as a matter of law *(see, People v Mandrachio,*55 NY2d 906, *cert denied*457 US 1122). In any event, the defendant’s statements do not warrant a finding that he invoked his right to remain silent with respect to police questioning *(cf., People v Wander,*47 NY2d 724; *People v Pugh,*70 AD2d 664). The record further indicates that the then 16-year-old defendant was read his *Miranda*rights, which he indicated that he understood; during his 12-hour detention (2:30 p.m. to 2:30 a.m.) before his first inculpatory statement, he was questioned for at most 2 *Yz*hours, and the questioning was not continuous; he was permitted to sleep for four hours; he did not request any food (missing only one normal mealtime) and he was given water upon his request. The defendant’s contention that he was hungry and frightened is not supported by the credible evidence. Moreover, he was not subjected to "the kind of persistent and overbearing interrogation which has been held to be objectionable” *(People v Robinson,*31 AD2d 724, 725; *cf., People v Leonard,*59 AD2d 1). There was no credible evidence that the defendant was intentionally isolated from his family and friends. Finally, with regard to any alleged police trickery, we agree with the hearing court that the police officers’ conduct was not " 'so fundamentally unfair as to deny [the defendant] due process’ ” nor was there a showing " 'that * * * promise[s] or threat[s were] made that could induce a false confession’ ” *People v Zehner,*112 AD2d 465, 466, *lv denied*66 NY2d 619, quoting from *People v Tarsia,*50 NY2d 1, 11; *see, People v Robinson,*31 AD2d 724, *supra).*Thus, we find no basis to disturb the hearing court’s determination that suppression of the defendant’s statements was not warranted. Brown, J. P., Lawrence, Fiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.