alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.22.1







LEASE AND OCCUPANCY AGREEMENT

3019 ENTERPRISE DRIVE, ANDERSON, IN

March 11, 2016





Altairnano Inc., sole tenant of the FEC Accelerator Building (hereafter called “A1”), located at 3019 Enterprise Drive, Anderson, Indiana, because of a change in business plans, wishes to terminate its lease on A1. The current lease extends to June 30, 2017.



Upon consideration of the terms of the lease, and the change in the status of Altairnano, Inc., the Flagship Enterprise Center has proposed, and Altairnano has accepted, a termination of the existing lease, effective April 30, 2016, under the following conditions:



| | 1. | Altairnano is contractually bound, after April 30, to pay a monthly lease of $20,000 through June 30, 2017.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | Flagship has proposed, and Altairnano has accepted, in lieu of the fourteen payments remaining under the Lease, dated January 27, 2015, to accept a total cash settlement of $140,000.00, being half (50%) of the remaining payments of $280,000.00. The total settlement is due and payable on or before April 30, 2016.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 3. | Flagship agrees to allow use of the A1 facility to the remaining Altairnano staff, without further basic rent, until the lease of the building. Altairnano will continue to be responsible for paying all utilities and ground maintenance costs, and will keep the building clean and accessible for real estate showings.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 4. | Upon lease of A1, Altairnano will be given a thirty (30) day notice to vacate the building.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The Agreement supersedes all previous agreements or arrangements.









FLAGSHIP ENTERPRISE CENTER, INC.



|/s/ Charles E. Stately             |  |                | 
|---------------------------------- |  | -------------- | 
|Charles E. Staley, President & CEO |  | Date 3/14/2016









ALTAIRNANO, INC.

****

/s/Karen WernerInterim CFO

Date 3/10/2016
<PAGE>
                                                                   Page 11 of 24

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(c)

                        KEYCORP STUDENT LOAN TRUST 2000-A
                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

JPMorgan Chase Bank                     Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas
fka, Bank One National Association      fka, Bankers Trust Company
One Bank One Plaza, Suite 0126          60 Wall Street, 26th Floor
Chicago, IL 60670                       Ney York, NY 10005
Attn: Corporate Trust Administration    Attn: Structured Finance Services
Phone: (312) 407-0192                   Mail Stop NYC60-2606
Fax: (312) 407-1708                     Phone: (212) 250-8522
                                        Fax: (212) 797-8606


Key Bank USA, National Association      MBIA Insurance Corporation
800 Superior Ave, 4th Floor             113 King Street
Cleveland, OH 44114                     Armonk, NY 10504
Attn: President, KER                    Attn: Data Administration
Phone: (216) 828-4293                   Phone: (914) 765-3772
Fax: (216) 828-9301                     Fax: (914) 765-3810



Pursuant to Section 3.08 of the Subservicing Agreement between Key Bank USA,
National Association as Master Servicer and Great Lakes Educational Loan
Services, Inc., as Subservicer, dated as of June 1, 2000 (the "Agreement"), the
undersigned hereby certifies that (i) a review of the activities of the
Subservicer from January 1, 2003, through December 31, 2003, and of its
performance under the Agreement has been made, and (ii) to the best of the
undersigned's knowledge, based on the review, the Subservicer has fulfilled all
its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period.

The undersigned also hereby certifies that the Subservicer has disclosed to the
Master Servicer and to the Trust's certified public accountants all significant
deficiencies relating to the Subservicer's compliance with the minimum servicing
standards in accordance with a review conducted in compliance with the standard
as set forth in the Agreement.

                                    Great Lakes Educational Loan Services, Inc.,
                                    Subservicer

Date: February 9, 2004              By:    /S/ MICHAEL J. NOACK
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                    Name: Michael J. Noack
                                    Title: Chief Servicing Officer
# C_2021266EN.01000401.xml

| 6.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 266/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 266/4

---

Special report No 16/2021

Common Agricultural Policy and climate: Half of EU climate spending but farm emissions are not decreasing

(2021/C 266/04)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that special report No 16/2021 ‘Common Agricultural Policy and climate: Half of EU climate spending but farm emissions are not decreasing’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu

---
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 32

       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the amended annual report of Capital Growth Systems,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Lee Wiskowski, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, I,
Douglas Stukel, the Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Derry L.
Behm, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to l8 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: November 10, 2004

                                      By:  /s/ Lee Wiskowski
                                           -------------------------------------
                                      Name:    Lee Wiskowski
                                      Title:   Co-Chief Executive Officer

                                      By:  /s/ Douglas Stukel
                                           -------------------------------------
                                      Name:    Douglas Stukel
                                      Title:   Co-Chief Executive Officer

                                      By:  /s/ Derry L. Behm
                                           -------------------------------------
                                      Name:    Derry L. Behm
                                      Title:   Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as an exhibit to the Report and is
not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

# AGENCY:

Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a meeting to develop a Phenomena Identification and Ranking Table (PIRT) for allowing burnup credit in spent fuel shipping casks. PIRTs have been used at NRC since 1988, and they provide a structured way to obtain a technical understanding that is needed to address certain issues. About fifteen of the world's best technical experts are participating in this activity, and the experts represent a balance between industry, universities, foreign researchers, and regulatory organizations. The PIRT activity is addressing technical issues related to burnup credit in the criticality safety analyses of PWR spent fuel in transport casks. 

# DATE:

May 16-18, 2000, 8:30 am-5:30 pm.

# ADDRESSES:

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Hearing Room (T3B45) of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The meeting agenda will be posted on the NRC Web site at                     *www.nrc.gov/​RES/​meetings.html*                     by May 1, 2000. The meeting is open to the public. Attendees will need to obtain a visitor badge at the TWFN building lobby, but an escort is not required.                 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. David Ebert, SMSAB, Division of Systems Analysis and Regulatory Effectiveness, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001, telephone (301) 415-6501; email dde@nrc.gov. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 11th day of April 2000.

Charles E. Rossi, 

Director, Division of Systems Analysis and Regulatory Effectiveness, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research.

[FR Doc. 00-9469 Filed 4-14-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
#### HYLAND, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 16, 1896.)

Action by George Hyland against the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.
#### Leonora Moran, Appellant, v Regency Savings Bank, F.S.B., et al., Defendants, and Rosenfeld, Bernstein & Tannenhauser, as Trustee, Respondent. Barry Siskin, Esq., Nonparty Appellant.

Submitted April 9, 2007;

decided May 1, 2007

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied *[see 8*NY3d 868]. Cross motion for the imposition of sanctions denied.
ContiFinancial Corporation
    Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    Exhibit 12.1 of September 30, 1999 Form 10-Q


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              Six months ended
                                                 September 30,
                                              1999           1998    Fiscal 99      Fiscal 98   Fiscal 97  Fiscal 96   Fiscal 95
                                          --------       --------    ---------      ---------   ---------  ---------   ---------
<S>                                       <C>              <C>       <C>             <C>         <C>        <C>          <C>
Summary:
  Earnings                                (418,804)       (55,575)   (255,696)       385,425     297,677    197,996      77,895
  Fixed Charges                             80,769        121,522     233,598        165,904     120,636     74,770      29,635
                                          --------       --------    --------       --------    --------   --------    --------
  Ratio                                      (5.96)(a)      (0.46)       (1.09)(b)       2.32        2.47       2.65        2.63
                                          ========       ========    ========       ========    ========   ========    ========

Earnings:
  Income (loss) before income taxes and
    minority interest                     (561,117)      (175,440)    (493,615)       224,965     177,041    126,536      56,988
  Plus: Interest expense                    80,769        121,522     233,598        165,904     120,636     74,770      29,635
  Less: Equity income/loss in unconsolidated
    subsidiaries                            (1,456)        (1,605)      4,321         (5,444)       --         --          --
  Less: Minority Interest                      n/a            (52)        n/a            n/a         n/a     (3,310)     (8,728)
                                          --------       --------    --------       --------    --------   --------    --------
  Total "Earnings"                        (481,804)       (55,575)   (255,696)       385,425     297,677    197,996      77,895
                                          ========       ========    ========       ========    ========   ========    ========

Fixed Charges:
  Interest expense                          80,769        121,522     233,598        165,904     120,636     74,770      29,635
</TABLE>

(a) The dollar amount of the deficiency at September 30, 1999 was $562,573.
(b) The dollar amount of the deficiency at March 31, 1999 was $489,294.
n/a = Not Applicable
**Exhibit      32.1 -**
**Certification      of Principal Executive Officer**

**CERTIFICATION      IN ACCORDANCE WITH**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED BY**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                William E. Ladin, Jr.     |
|----------------------------------------------|
| William                E. (Billy) Ladin, Jr. |
| Chief Executive Officer            |
| Date:                May 12, 2008            |

----
vnue_ex1013.htm

EXHIBIT 10.13
  
 	 
	1
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	2
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	3
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	4
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	5
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	6
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	7
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	8
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	9
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	10
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	11
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	12
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	13
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	14
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	15
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Secure Computing Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Timothy J. Steinkopf, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Timothy J. Steinkopf                         
|Timothy J. Steinkopf                             
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|August 3, 2005
#### Randy D. FISHER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. OREGON BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION and Brian Belleque, Respondent-Appellees.

No. 07-36096.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Oct. 6, 2010.

Filed April 25, 2011.

*759Anthony David Bornstein, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Portland, OR, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Office of the Oregon Attorney General, Salem, OR, for Respondent-Appellees.

Before: PAEZ and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges, and BURNS *, District Judge.

*

 The Honorable Larry Alan Burns, United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

Randy Fisher maintains the Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (“the Board”) violated his due process rights when it refused to grant him early parole eligibility. The district court denied habeas relief, and we affirm.

In 2001, Fisher requested a hearing with the Board to determine his eligibility for parole. *See*Or.Rev.Stat. § 163.105(2). The mandatory language of § 163.105 provides Fisher with a constitutionally protected liberty interest in early parole eligibility, of which he cannot be deprived without due process. *Miller v. Oregon Bd. of Parole,*642 F.3d 711 (9th Cir.2011) (filed concurrently with this disposition). The Board conducted a hearing, but denied Fisher’s application for early parole eligibility.

In *Swarthout v. Cooke,*- U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 859, 178 L.Ed.2d 732 (2011), the Supreme Court held that the due process entitlements in the context of parole are “minimal”: advance access to records; notice and opportunity to be heard; and a statement of the reasons why parole is denied are all that are required. 562 U.S. at 4-5. Fisher concedes he was afforded these minimum required procedural due process protections, so there is no basis for overturning the Board’s denial.

Because Fisher is not entitled to habeas relief, we decline to address whether his claims were procedurally defaulted. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(2); *Cassett v. Stewart,*406 F.3d 614, 623-24 (9th Cir.2005).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
# Exhibit 32

# Written Statement of
Paul E. Menzel (Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer)and Timothy D.
Dondlinger (Senior Vice President and Treasurer)Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350

Solely for the purposes of complying
with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, we, the undersigned Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, and Senior
Vice President and Treasurer, respectively, of Ridgestone Financial Services, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                                                 | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/  Paul E. Menzel                                              | 
|Paul E. Menzel
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer | 

|                                                          | 
|--------------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/  Timothy D. Dondlinger                                | 
|Timothy D. Dondlinger
Senior Vice President and
Treasurer | 

Date:  August 12, 2004
#### Boak *v.*Blair *et al.*

*(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.*

July 18, 1890.)

Assignment for Benefit of Creditors—Directory Provisions of Statute.

Laws N. Y. 188S, c. 394, amending the general assignment act (Laws 1877, c. 466) so as to provide that in an assignment for benefit of creditors the residence, kind of business carried on by the debtor at the time, the place where conducted, and, if in a city, the street and number, should be specifically stated,' is merely directory, and the failure of the assignor to fully comply therewith will not render the assignment void. Following *Taggcurt*v. *Sisso7i,*9 N. Y. Supp. 758.

Appeal from circuit court, Orange county.

Action by Abram V. Boak as receiver of Eugene A. Blair to set aside an assignment for benefit of creditors executed by said Eugene A. Blair to defendant Thomas Watts. There was judgment for plaintiff on the ground that the assignment did not state the kind of business, or the place where the assignor was in business at the time of the assignment. Defendants appeal. Laws ÍT. T. 1888, c. 294, amending Laws 1877, c. 466, declares that every conveyance or assignment made by a debtor of his estate, real or personal, or both, to an assignee for the creditors of such debtor, shall be in writing, and shall specifically state therein the residence and the kind of business carried on-by such debtor at the time of making the assignment, and the place at which such business shall then be conducted, and if such place be in a city the street and number thereof, and if in a village or town such apt designation as shall reasonably identify such debtor.

Argued before Dykman and Pratt, JJ.

*William Vanamee*and *William F. O'Neill,*for appellants. *T. A. Read,*for respondent.

*899Pratt, J.

Since the decision appealed from was made the general term of the fourth department in *Taggart*v. *Sisson,*9 N. Y. Supp. 758, have considered the same question, and have concluded that the statute of 1888 does not render void an assignment failing to state the business, location, etc., of the assignor. The respect we owe to the carefully considered opinion of that branch of the court requires us to follow their decision. It follows, that the judgment appealed from must be reversed, but, as the question is new, without costs, and the plaintiff receiver should be allowed to discontinue the action without costs.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of EGL, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:

May 10, 2006

By:

/s/ James R. Crane



James R. Crane

Chief Executive Officer

(principal executive officer)



Date:

May 10, 2006

By:

/s/ Charles H. Leonard



Charles H. Leonard

Chief Financial Officer

(principal financial officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to EGL, Inc. and will be retained by EGL, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.