alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

          - 45 CFR Part 60
          - RIN 0906-AA41

# AGENCY:

Health Resources and Services Administration, DHHS.

# ACTION:

Proposed rule; status. 

# SUMMARY:

The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) is announcing its intention to issue a second Notice of proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) on National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) Medical Malpractice payments Reporting Requirements following a period of data gathering and evaluation. This will involve a new 60-day public comment period for the revised proposal.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Thomas C. Croft, 301-443-2300.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Proposed rules regarding amending the medical malpractice payment reporting requirements for the NPDB were published on December 24, 1998 (63 FR 71255). More than 120 comments on the proposed rule were received. Given the large number of thoughtful comments and the high level of concern that was voiced about the potential impact of the proposal as published, HRSA believes it is imperative to gather additional data and conduct further analyses before proceeding. A new NPRM then will be published for public comment, with a goal of publishing the revised proposal by the end of 2000. The decision to publish another NPRM with its associated public comment period means that new final regulations likely will be implemented in 2001.

Authority:Secs. 401-432 of the Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986, Pub. L. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3784-3794, as amended by sec. 402 of Pub. L. 100-177, 101 Stat. 1007-1008 (42 U.S.C. 11101-11152).

Dated: October 19, 1999.

Claude Earl Fox,

Administrator, Health Resources and Services Administration.

Donna E. Shalala,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-9470  Filed 4-14-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-15-M
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 28, 2010

s0621 

# Order

June 28, 2010

140834

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140834 COA: 295529 Wayne CC: 08-002586-FC ANTONIO TERELLE MOORER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 29, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
March 28, 2003

Mr. Roger Chaufournier
CEO
Patient InfoSystems, Inc.
46 Prince Street
Rochester, NY  14607

Dear Roger:

We are writing this letter
to document our commitment to raise with appropriate investors or, if necessary,
invest personally the moneys needed to fund PATIs operations through the
end of 2003. As of the date of this agreement $300,000 has already been provided
to fund PATIs operations. The terms under which these monies will be
advanced are subject to final negotiation between the Board of Directors and the
investors.

This commitment is valid
for 2003 and expires as of January 1, 2004. Roger, as you know, we have a
significant amount of capital invested in Patient InfoSystems (in excess of $7
million combined) and we will do whatever is needed to raise the additional
capital necessary to help the company succeed and prosper.

Please contact either of us
if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

`/s/John Pappajohn                           /s/Derace L. Schaffer, M.D.
------------------------------------        -----------------------------------
John Pappajohn                              Derace L. Schaffer, M.D.`
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2270 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2270

                     One Hundred Fourteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the sixth day of January, two thousand and fifteen

                                 An Act

 
 To redesignate the Nisqually National Wildlife Refuge, located in the 
State of Washington, as the Billy Frank Jr. Nisqually National Wildlife 
Refuge, to establish the Medicine Creek Treaty National Memorial within 
              the wildlife refuge, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Billy Frank Jr. Tell Your Story 
Act''.
SEC. 2. REDESIGNATION OF THE NISQUALLY NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE.
    (a) Redesignation.--The Nisqually National Wildlife Refuge, located 
in the State of Washington, is redesignated as the ``Billy Frank Jr. 
Nisqually National Wildlife Refuge''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in any statute, rule, regulation, 
Executive order, publication, map, paper, or other document of the 
United States to the Nisqually National Wildlife Refuge is deemed to 
refer to the Billy Frank Jr. Nisqually National Wildlife Refuge.
SEC. 3. MEDICINE CREEK TREATY NATIONAL MEMORIAL, WASHINGTON.
    (a) Establishment.--There is established the Medicine Creek Treaty 
National Memorial within the Billy Frank Jr. Nisqually National 
Wildlife Refuge to commemorate the location of the signing of the 
Medicine Creek Treaty of 1854 between the United States Government and 
leaders of the Muckleshoot, Nisqually, Puyallup, and Squaxin Island 
Indian Tribes.
    (b) Acreage and Administration.--The Secretary of the Interior 
shall establish the boundaries of the Medicine Creek Treaty National 
Memorial and provide for administration and interpretation of the 
memorial by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service.
    (c) Coordination.--The Secretary of the Interior shall coordinate 
with representatives of the Muckleshoot, Nisqually, Puyallup, and 
Squaxin Island Indian Tribes in providing for the interpretation of the 
Medicine Creek Treaty National Memorial.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### HAAS v. WATSON.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June, 1896.)

Action by Louis Haas against Thomas Watson.

No opinion. Motion granted, with $10 costs.
Compiled By: CAPT C. Fosse

Contact: (202) 677-9534

Revision Date: 26 Mar 2020

1

Commandant of the Coast Guard

Issue Paper

Subject: CGMA Programs during Coronavirus Pandemic

Background

This Issue Paper describes the Coast Guard Mutual Assistance programs designed to provide 

relieve to eligible recipients during the coronavirus pandemic.

Current Status

Using the disaster authority granted to us by the Board in 2017 for the Hurricane Season, CGMA 

has adapted the disaster relief policy for COVID-19 in the following ways.

 Loss of Pay. If a spouse loses their job temporarily due to closures or shutdowns related to 

the virus, loans of up $6000 are authorized. Members are restricted to requesting an amount 

equal to one month of normal pay which must be substantiated by a paycheck stub or other 

verification of income for the spouse. 

 Child Care Costs. If a family is required to obtain childcare due to school closings, loans of 

up to $6000 are authorized. Members are restricted to requesting one month’s worth of the 

expected cost which must be verified by a letter or receipt from the provider. 

 Quarantine. Members placed into a quarantine situation are authorized loans of up to $6000. 

An opportunity to convert these to grants will be provided later (prior to collection). Grants 

will be granted only after a member has settled any and all claims with applicable agencies 

(USCG, Federal, State, etc.) Member should retain documentation from these periods. These 

grants will be limited to a maximum of $4000 per family ($2500 max for lodging related 

expenses and $1500 max for food related expenses.) 

 Change/Cancellation Fee Reimbursement: Although almost all airlines have agreed to 

waive change and/or cancellation fees during this period, it is not 100%. Therefore, CGMA 

will reimburse members for these costs incurred. This program may be used for any travel 

related cancellation or change fees (including hotels). It may not be used for forfeited 

deposits – only for fees charged to change or cancel the travel. 

 Voluntary Relocation. For personnel residing in locations outside of the 50 states, where 

medical infrastructure in insufficient during this crisis, $6000 in loans to CGMA eligible 

clients (active, reservists, civilian employees, retirees) to temporarily relocate to a safe 

environment. This program is focused primarily on Puerto Rico, but CGMA can consider 

applications from other locations if needed. 

Next Steps / Action Items

1. CAG, CG-094, CG-092, CG-133, and CG-111 (Personal Financial Management Program) 

are collaborating on products to inform the workforce on the entire spectrum of financial 

assistance and entitlements that may be available due to the coronavirus pandemic, targeting 

the week of 30 March for release.

2. CGMA is updating their website to include the last two bullets above; currently the first three 

are visible to anyone who visits the site.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Investigator Initiated Program Project Applications (P01 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).                    

*Date:*                         October 15, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G56, Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Poonam Tewary, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G56, Rockville, MD 20852, (301) 761-7219,                         *tewaryp@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 15, 2021. 

Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-20373 Filed 9-20-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### General Services Administration

          - [Notice-PBS-2021-05; Docket No. 2021-0002; Sequence No. 18]

# AGENCY:

Public Buildings Service (PBS), General Services Administration (GSA).

# ACTION:

Notice of a bulletin.

# SUMMARY:

The attached bulletin announces the designation of a Federal building.

# DATES:

This bulletin expires March 14, 2022. The building designation remains in effect until canceled or superseded by another bulletin.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        General Services Administration, Public Buildings Service (PBS), Office of Portfolio Management, Attn: Chandra Kelley, 77 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, GA 30303, at 404-562-2763, or by email at                         *chandra.kelley@gsa.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This bulletin announces the designation of a Federal building. Public Law 115-39, dated June 6, 2017, designated the Federal Building located at 719 Church Street in Nashville, TN, as the “Fred D. Thompson Federal Building and United States Courthouse.” The name sequence was later modified by the Administrator of General Service on June 19, 2019 to the “Fred D. Thompson United States Courthouse and Federal Building” in accordance with the authority set forth at 40 U.S.C. 3102.

Robin Carnahan,

Administrator of General Services.

[FR Doc. 2021-20146 Filed 9-16-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-Y1-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6433

MILTON MORENO, Petitioner - Appellant, versus ALTON BASKERVILLE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (CA-03-430) Submitted: April 29, 2004 Decided: May 6, 2004 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Milton Moreno, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen R. McCullough, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Milton Moreno seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely filed his petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). When, as here, a district court dismisses a § 2254 petition solely on procedural grounds, a certificate of appealability will not issue unless the petitioner can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.’” Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir. 2001) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Moreno has not made the requisite showing. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003). Accordingly, we deny Moreno’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 96-3359

_____________

H.D.N. Child, a minor, by his mother *

and next friend, A.B., on behalf of *

himself and all others similarly situated; *

A.B., as mother and next friend for *

minor, H.D.N. Child, *

*

Appellants, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Western

* District of Missouri.

Brenda Roberts, Deputy Juvenile *

Officer for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit,* [UNPUBLISHED]

Saline County, Missouri; in her *

individual and official capacities and as *

representative of all juvenile officers in *

the State of Missouri, *

*

Appellee. *

_____________

Submitted: June 11, 1997

Filed: June 23, 1997

_____________

Before BOWMAN, FLOYD R. GIBSON, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD,

Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.
The Honorable Dean Whipple, United States District Judge for the Western

1

District of Missouri.

-2-

H.D.N. Child, who along with his mother was the plaintiff below, appeals the

order of the District Court dismissing plaintiffs' claims as moot. The child also appeals 1

the order of the District Court denying plaintiffs' motion to certify a class of similarly

situated plaintiffs.

Having considered the case, we conclude that the District Court's determination

of mootness was correct. We further conclude that the District Court did not abuse its

discretion by denying certification of the proposed class. Accordingly, the orders of

the District Court are

AFFIRMED. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-10650

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

SIDNEY LEUDEO CAICEDO, also known as Aron Borrero

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:98-CR-206-2

Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Sidney Leudeo Caicedo, federal prisoner # 79331-079, was convicted of

conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute and distribution of cocaine, in

violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. He appeals the district court’s denial of his 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion, which seeks a two-level sentencing reduction based

on the retroactive Amendment 706 to the crack cocaine guidelines. The district

court denied the motion on the ground that Caicedo was held accountable only

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

March 31, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-10650

2

for powder cocaine. We review the district court’s denial of a § 3582(c)(2) motion

for abuse of discretion. United States v. Boe, 117 F.3d 830, 831 (5th Cir. 1997).

Caicedo renews his argument that he was entitled to a sentencing

reduction based on the retroactive crack cocaine amendments; he asserts that

his original indictment and the offense conduct involved crack cocaine. Although

the initial indictment alleged offenses involving both powder and crack cocaine,

Caicedo pleaded guilty to a superseding indictment that alleged offenses

involving only powder cocaine. The presentence report (PSR) also indicates that

Caicedo’s offense level was calculated based upon a quantity of cocaine, not crack

cocaine. As the district court correctly determined, because Caicedo’s guidelines

range was not derived from a quantity of crack cocaine, he was not “sentenced

to a term of imprisonment based on a sentencing range that ha[d] subsequently

been lowered by the Sentencing Commission.” See § 3582(c)(2). To the extent

Caicedo challenges the validity of the superseding indictment, such a claim is

not cognizable in a § 3582(c)(2) motion. See § 3582(c)(2); United States v. Shaw,

30 F.3d 26, 29 (5th Cir. 1994).

AFFIRMED.
#### NEW YORK MUT. GASLIGHT CO., Respondent, v. GRAY, Appellant.

(Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.

May 9, 1894.)

Action by the New York Mutual Gaslight Company against Albert Gray. Argued before DALY, C. X, and BISOHOEF and PRYOR, XT.

Fromme Bros., for appellant.

W. R. Bronk, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with costs.