alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2560 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2560

 To authorize the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency 
 to waive any emission standard or other requirement under section 112 
  of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7412) applicable to the control of 
   asbestos emissions in the demolition or renovation of a condemned 
  building for which there is a reasonable expectation of structural 
                                failure.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 21, 2015

 Ms. Stefanik (for herself and Mr. Newhouse) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency 
 to waive any emission standard or other requirement under section 112 
  of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7412) applicable to the control of 
   asbestos emissions in the demolition or renovation of a condemned 
  building for which there is a reasonable expectation of structural 
                                failure.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Common Sense Waiver Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. WAIVER FROM ASBESTOS NESHAP REQUIREMENTS FOR DEMOLITION OR 
              RENOVATION OF CONDEMNED BUILDINGS.

    (a) Waiver.--At the request of a State or local government, the 
Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (in this section 
referred to as the ``Administrator'') may waive any emission standard 
or other requirement under section 112 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 
7412) applicable to the control of asbestos emissions in the demolition 
or renovation of a building.
    (b) Standard for Approval.--The Administrator may approve a request 
for a waiver under subsection (a) only if the request demonstrates 
that--
            (1) the building has been condemned; and
            (2) there is a reasonable expectation of the building's 
        structural failure.
    (c) Time Period for Approval or Disapproval of Request for 
Waiver.--The Administrator shall approve or disapprove a request for a 
waiver under subsection (a) within 90 days after the date on which the 
request is received by the Administrator. If the Administrator fails to 
approve or disapprove such a request by the end of such 90-day period, 
the request is deemed to be approved.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 75 (Tuesday, April 18, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 20839]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9626]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, Spent Fuel 
Project Office; Notice of Issuance and Availability of NUREG-1567, 
Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Facilities

    The United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has issued 
the final report NUREG-1567, ``Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry 
Storage Facilities''.
    The Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Facilities 
provides guidance to the NRC staff for reviewing applications for 
license approval or renewal for commercial independent spent fuel 
storage installations (ISFSIs). An ISFSI may be co-located with a 
reactor or may be away from a reactor site. These installations may be 
designed for the storage of irradiated nuclear fuel and associated 
radioactive materials.
    NUREG-1567 is intended for use by the NRC staff. Its objectives are 
to: (1) Summarize the requirements in Title 10, Code of Federal 
Regulations, Part 72 for facility approval; (2) describe the procedures 
by which the NRC staff determines that these requirements have been 
satisfied; and (3) document the practices developed by the staff in 
previous reviews of facility applications.
    NUREG-1567 is available for inspection, and copying for a fee, at 
the NRC Public Document Room, 2120 L Street NW (Lower Level), 
Washington DC 20555-0001. Copies of NUREG-1567 may be purchased from 
the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, P.O. 
Box 37082, Washington, DC 20402-9328, telephone no. 1-202-512-1800, or 
the National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, 
Springfield, VA 22161, telephone no. 1-800-553-6847. This document is 
also available at the NRC web site, http://www.nrc.gov. See the link 
under ``Technical Reports in the NUREG Series'' on the ``Reference 
Library Page.''

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 11th day of April, 2000.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
M. Wayne Hodges,
Deputy Director, Technical Review Directorate, Spent Fuel Project 
Office, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 00-9626 Filed 4-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

UNITED STATES COAST GUAR-D

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD,

Complainant,

YS.

NICHOLAS JtrFFERY CHANEY,

Respondent.

Docket Number 2023-0033

CG Enforcement Activity Number 7612233

CONSENT ORDER

Issued: July 5.2023

By: Honorable Georqe J. Jordan, Administrative Law Judge

Appearances:

Michael Micucci, CWO

USCG Sector Miami

For the Coast (,]uard

CARL MARRONE, Esq.

For the Respondent
CONSENT ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

On June 29, 2023,1held a status conference during which the pafties sought clarification

regarding the Settlement Agreement (agreement) and deficiences outlincd in my June 7,2023

Order rejecting the agreement.

As explained, the reason for the order rejecting this agreement is due to discrepancies in

paragraphs 3(a) and 6, where it is stated that upon Respondent's successful completion of the

agreement's requirements, the Coast Guard will retum his credential. However, there is no

mention ofthe period ofdeposit being registered as a suspension.

During the status conference, the parties stipulated that Coast Guard policy states that

Respondent's credential will be suspended outright for the period ofdeposit, ifsuccessful

completion of all requirements olhis agreement are met. Further, the proceedings here are

remedial in nature. Thus, the time frames agreed to by the parties, including any progress

completed, u,ill apply to this agreement.

I have carefully reviewed the terms ofthe Settlement Agreement and find it is fair and

reasonable and in substantial compliance with the requirements of 33 C.F.R. S 20.502.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the record, it is hereby ORDERED. the Settlement Agreement is

APPROVED in full and incorporated herein by reference. This Consent Order shall constitute

full, final, and complete adjudication of this proceeding.

2
SO ORDERED.

Done and dated luly 5,2023,

Seanle, Washington

ordan

Administrative Law Judge

United States Coast Guard

l

George J.