alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- Skip to Primary Navigation
      - Skip to Main Content
      - Skip to Footer

          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   

        -  Water & Power            - Dams
          - Powerplants
          - Projects
          - Agrimet/Hydromet
          - Water Operations 
        -  Resources & Research            - Programs
          - Technical Service Center
          - Research & Development
          - Reclamation Manual
          - Environmental Resources/Reports
          - Library 
        -  About Us            - Mission/Vision
          - Fact Sheet
          - Commissioner
          - Addresses/Contacts
          - Organizational Chart
          - Leadership Bios
          - Employment
          - Contact 
        -  Recreation & Public Use            - Find Recreation
          - Recreation.gov
          - Public Use 
        -  News & Multimedia            - News Releases
          - News Stories
          - Speeches
          - Congressional Testimony
          - Fact Sheets
          - Photos
          - Multimedia
          - Social Media 

# Youth

              - Reclamation
              - Youth
              - Employment
              - Job Opportunities

YOUTH              - Youth
              - Recreation
              - Education
              - Volunteer
              - Employment                  - Job Opportunities
                - Pathways to a Federal Career
                - Youth Partners
                - Benefits 
              - Contact
              - News

## Job Opportunities

Reclamation advertises all its opportunities on USA Jobs. 

## Reclamation - Student Internships

## Reclamation - Recent Graduates

## Reclamation - All positions

 

 

*Last Updated: November 5, 2018*

## More Information about the Bureau of Reclamation

## Stay in Touch

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

            - Contact Us
            - Site Index
            - Accessibility
            - Disclaimer
            - DOI
            - FOIA
            - No Fear Act
            - Notices
            - Privacy Policy
            - Quality of Information
            - Recreation.gov
            - USA.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001018743
<NAME> OVLC MANAGEMENT CORP.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,454,215
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,453,215
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,454,215
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
J-S76019-14 

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA 

 Appellee 

v. 

STEPHEN JAMES CHAPMAN 

 Appellant No. 921 WDA 2014 

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence May 9, 2014 

In the Court of Common Pleas of Crawford County 

Criminal Division at No(s): CP-20-SA-0000037-2013 

BEFORE: FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E., PANELLA, J., and OLSON, J. 

 JUDGMENT ORDER BY PANELLA, J. FILED FEBRUARY 4, 2015 

The trial court convicted Appellant, Stephen James Chapman, of the 

summary offense of driving while operating privilege is suspended, DUI 

related. See 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 7543(b)(1). Chapman does not dispute that his 

driver’s license was suspended at the time of the incident. On appeal, 

Chapman simply maintains that the Commonwealth presented insufficient 

evidence to sustain the conviction as “there was no direct evidence that [he] 

operated the vehicle in question.”1 Appellant’s Brief, at 3. 

The Commonwealth need not produce direct evidence that Chapman 

operated the vehicle, “but may instead rely on circumstantial evidence 

____________________________________________ 

1

 For our standard of review, see Commonwealth v. Harden, 103 A.3d 

107, 111 (Pa. Super. 2014). 
J-S76019-14 

- 2 - 

creating the inference that the vehicle had been in motion in order to meet 

its evidentiary burden.” Commonwealth v. Herb, 852 A.2d 356, 361 (Pa. 

Super. 2004) (citation omitted). 

 Here, Trooper John Michalak testified that he observed a parked 

minivan situated partially in the lane of travel. There was no one in the 

minivan. The only person in the vicinity was a man, later identified as 

Chapman, across the road using a cell phone. Chapman informed the 

trooper that he had been driving a group of Amish home and that the vehicle 

broke down. See N.T., Summary Appeal Hearing, 5/9/14, at 7-8, 11. The 

passengers were no longer there as someone else came and picked them up. 

 Chapman’s argument centers on the fact that Trooper Michalak did not 

observe him driving the minivan firsthand. But he did not need to. There is 

an abundance of circumstantial evidence that Chapman was the driver: 

Chapman admitted to the trooper that he was the driver of the vehicle; 

there were no other people present on the rural stretch of road; and the 

vehicle was left partially in the lane of travel. The trial court credited Trooper 

Michalak’s testimony. See Trial Court Opinion, 7/14/14, at 3. 

 The Commonwealth presented sufficient evidence to sustain the 

conviction. 

 Judgment of sentence affirmed. 
J-S76019-14 

- 3 - 

Judgment Entered. 

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. 

Prothonotary 

Date: 2/4/2015
1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

Complainant

vs.

FEBEN MEHARI NEGASH

Respondent.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket Number: 2023-0463

MISLE Activity ID: 7824281

WITHDRAWAL FROM DOCKET

The Coast Guard initiated an administrative proceeding by filing a Complaint on December 19, 

2023, seeking a revocation of Respondent’s Merchant Mariner Credential.

On Jan 17, 2024, the Coast Guard filed a Motion of Withdrawal from docket as:

Respondent signed a Voluntary Surrender Agreement in accordance with 46 CFR 5.203.

This matter is removed from the docket and closed without prejudice effective this date. The 

Coast Guard reserves the right to file a new Complaint in this matter.

Done and Dated January 18, 2024 at, 

Baltimore, MD

____________________________

Lauren M Meus

Hearing Docket Clerk

U.S. Coast Guard

By Direction of the Chief Administrative Law Judge
, 

Pickering 

Parraguirre 

compelling his attendance at a deposition in Nevada because real parties 

in interest improperly filed the underlying confession of judgment with the 

same district court case number as a previous district court action that 

was dismissed on the parties' stipulation, making the order compelling 

petitioner's deposition in the confessed judgment proceeding void. 

Having considered the petition, answer, reply, and the 

appendices, we conclude that our extraordinary intervention is not 

warranted at this time. Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851. In 

particular, petitioner did not provide this court with a copy of a written 

order memorializing the district court's ruling that petitioner appear in 

Washoe County for a deposition, see Rust v. Clark Cnty. Sch. Dist., 103 

Nev. 686, 688-89, 747 P.2d 1380, 1382 (1987) (recognizing that an oral 

ruling is ineffective for any purpose), and we are not otherwise convinced 

that petitioner's argument regarding the district court's jurisdiction over 

the confession of judgment proceedings warrants our extraordinary 

intervention, at least at this point in the proceedings. See Pan, 120 Nev. 

at 228, 88 P.3d at 844; Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851. Thus, 

under these circumstances, we 

ORDER the petition DENIED.' 

J. 

'In light of our resolution of this matter, we vacate the temporary 

stay imposed by our April 4, 2014, order. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 2 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 
cc: Hon. Brent T. Adams, District Judge 

Robison Belaustegui Sharp & Low 

Gordon Silver/Reno 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

3 

(0) 1947A
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Frank Burnette, Also Known as Clifford Boone, Appellant.

Memorandum: Upon our review of the record of the hearing upon remittitur *(see, People v Burnette,*117 AD2d 987), we agree that defendant was not deprived of the effective assistance of counsel as a result of his attorney’s prior joint representation of him and his codefendant for approximately three months following their arraignment. The hearing court properly concluded that the attorney disengaged himself from the joint representation before any conflict of interest materialized and that the defendant did not demonstrate that the conduct of his defense was in fact affected by the operation of the claimed conflict *(People v Alicea,*61 NY2d 23, 30-31). Moreover, we conclude that the court properly denied defendant’s CPL 330.30 motion to set aside the verdict based upon a claim of newly discovered evidence. The record fully supports the conclusion that the codefendant’s exculpatory remarks at his sentencing were unworthy of belief and there is no probability that this evidence would have altered the jury’s verdict *(see, People v Suarez, 98*AD2d 678, 679). (Resubmission of appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Marshall, J. — burglary, second degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Den-man, Boomer and Schnepp, JJ.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARI)

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

Complainant

vs.

DE'MARCO BOWENS

Respondent

Docket Number 2023-0050

Enforcement Activity No. 7 626350

CONSENT ORDER

Issued: Mav 16. 2023

Bv Administrative Law Judqe: Honorable Timothv G. Stueve

Appearances:

LCDR Braden Rostad

USCG Sector LA./LB

For the Coast Guard

De'Marco Bowens, Pro Se

For Respondent
CONSENT ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

On or about May 11,2023 the parties in this case submitted a Motion for Approval of

Settlement Agreement and Entry ofConsent Order to be approved as a settlement ofthe case

under 33 C.F.R. $ 20.502.

I have carefully reviewed the terms of the Settlement Agreement and find it is fair and

reasonable and in substantial compliance with the requirements of 33 C.F.R. $ 20.502.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the record, it is hereby ORDERED, the Settlement Agreement is

APPROVED in full and incorporated herein by reference. This Consent Order shall constitute

full, final, and complete adjudication ofthis proceeding.

Done and dated May 16,2023, at

Alameda, Califomia

Timothy G. Stueve

Administrative Law Judge

U.S. Coast Guard
# C_2021480EN.01000601.xml

| 29.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 480/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 480/6

---

Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)

(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1))

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 480/06)

Decision granting an authorisation

| Reference of the decision (2) | Date of decision | Substance name | Holder of the authorisation | Authorisation number | Authorised use | Date of expiry of review period | Reasons for the decision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| C(2021) 8269 | 22 November 2021 | Chromium trioxide
  EC No. 215-607-8, CAS No. 1333-82-0 | ThyssenKrupp Electrical Steel GmbH Kurt-Schumacher-Straße 95, 45881, Gelsenkirchen, Northrhine-Westphalia, Germany





  Thyssenkrupp Electrical Steel UGO S.A.S., |
| Rue Roger Salengro, 62330 Isbergues, France |

Reference of the decision (2)

Date of decision

Substance name

Holder of the authorisation

Authorisation number

Authorised use

Date of expiry of review period

Reasons for the decision

C(2021) 8269

22 November 2021

Chromium trioxide

EC No. 215-607-8, CAS No. 1333-82-0

ThyssenKrupp Electrical Steel GmbH Kurt-Schumacher-Straße 95, 45881, Gelsenkirchen, Northrhine-Westphalia, Germany

Thyssenkrupp Electrical Steel UGO S.A.S.,

Rue Roger Salengro, 62330 Isbergues, France

REACH/21/3/0

REACH/21/3/1

As surface treatment for the manufacture of grain-oriented electrical steel used in magnetic cores of high-performance transformers and related electromagnetic devices

31 December 2029

In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies.

---

(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006 , p. 1.

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: Authorisation (europa.eu).

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 18, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-10904 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus REUBEN A. ALVAREZ, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:02-CR-117-A-ALL

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Reuben A. Alvarez, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Alvarez has received a copy of counsel's motion and brief, but he has not filed a response. Our review of the brief filed by counsel and of the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw isNo. 03-10904 -2- GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
Listen

# Request for Congressional Appropriation for Fiscal Year 2021

February 10, 2020

Report

-  All Reports 
-  Annual Statutory Enforcement 
-  Briefing Reports 
-  Advisory Committees Reports 
-  Budget and Performance 
-  FOIA Reports 
-  Data Inventory Program 
-  Civil Rights Complaints 
-  Historical Publications 
-  Archives
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dontae E. Coble, Also Known as D-Money, Appellant.

[945 NYS2d 587]

Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Michael E Pietruszka, J.), rendered November 23, 2010. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of murder in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed. Present — Scudder, P.J., Centra, Peradotto, Carni and Lindley, JJ.
LTNITED STATES OF AMERICA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

UNITI,D STATES COAST GUARI)

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

Complainant

VS

Dockel Number 2023-0059

Enforcement Acrivitv No 7616'711

CONSENT ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

On May 25, 2023, the parties in this case submitted a Motion for Approval of a

Settlement Agreement and Entry ofConsent Order to be approved as a settlement ofthe case

under 33 C.F.R. S 20.502.

I have carefully reviewed the terms of the Settlement Agreement and find that it is fair

and reasonable and in substantial compliance with the requirements of33 C.F.R. $ 20.502.

ORDER

Upon consideration of record, it is hereby ORDERED that the Settlement Agreement is

APPRO\aED in full and incorporated herein by reference. This Consent Order shall constitute

full, final, and complete adjudication of this proceeding.

Done and Dated May 31, 2023 at

New Orleans, LA

HON. BRIAN J. CURLEY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

ADMTNISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE

EMANUEL LORENZO SPAIN. JR.

Respondent
# C_2021006EN.01000701.xml

| 8.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10055 — MIRA/Romanian assets of CEZ)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 6/05)

On 23 December 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M10055. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M10055. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

_________________________________

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

Complainant

vs.

JEREMY W. CAPRARI

Respondent

_________________________________

Docket Number 2023-0411

Enforcement Activity No. 7791377

CONSENT ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

On November 3, 2023, the parties in this case submitted a Motion for Approval of a 

Settlement Agreement and Entry of Consent Order to be approved as a settlement of the case 

under 33 C.F.R. § 20.502.

I have carefully reviewed the terms of the Settlement Agreement and find that it is fair 

and reasonable and in substantial compliance with the requirements of 33 C.F.R. § 20.502.

ORDER

Upon consideration of record, it is hereby ORDERED that the Settlement Agreement is 

APPROVED in full and incorporated herein by reference. This Consent Order shall constitute 

full, final, and complete adjudication of this proceeding.

Done and Dated November 20, 2023 at

New Orleans, LA

_________________________________

HON. BRIAN J. CURLEY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 180 (Tuesday, September 21, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 52471]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-20429]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than October 21, 2021.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Holly A. Rieser, Manager) 
P.O. Box 442, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034. Comments can also be sent 
electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#33705c5e5e565d47401d5243435f5a5052475a5c5d407340475f401d5541511d5c4154"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a5e6cac8c8c0cbd1d68bc4d5d5c9ccc6c4d1cccacbd6e5d6d1c9d68bc3d7c78bcad7c2">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc., Louisville, Kentucky; to acquire 
Commonwealth Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire 
Commonwealth Bank and Trust Company, both of Louisville, Kentucky.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 16, 
2021.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2021-20429 Filed 9-20-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>