alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### J. F. Mays, Administrator of Sarah Alexadner, *v.*The United States.

*On the Proofs.*

*Mrs. Alexander, a widow of a soldier of the revolutionary war, married subsequent to*J800. *She received a pension under the Act February*3, 1853, (10 *Stat. L.,*154,) *commencing, under a decision of the Secretary of the Interior, on the 3d day of February,*1853. *The administrator claims that the pension should have commenced on the ith of March,*1848, *in accordance with the provisions of the act of that date*(9 *Stat. L.,*265,) *granting pensions to widows of soldiers of the Revolution married prior to*1800.

I. The certificate of the Commissioner of Pensions is *prima facie*evidence of title to a pension and of all ihe facts that make the title.

II. A pension granted to a widow of a soldier of the Revolution married subsequent to 1800, by the *Act February*3, 1853, (10 Stat. L., 154,) should commence, March 4, 1848, *Lydia Clark’s Case*(1 C. Cls. R., 179) reaffirmed.

*Mr. John A. Wills,*for tbe claimant.

*Mr. T. U. Talbot,*(with whom was tbe *Assistant Attorney General,)*for tbe defendants.

*219Loeing-, J.,

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court:

Tbe petition states that tbe claimant is tbe widow of Joseph Alexander, a soldier of tbe revolutionary army, and as such is a pensioner under tbe second section of tbe act of February 3, 1853; and she claims tbe payment of her pension from tbe 4th day of March, 1848, to tbe 3d day of February, 1853, which lias been demanded at the department and refused.

In support of her petition, tbe claimant produces tbe certificate of tbe Commissioner of Pensions that she is, as stated, a pensioner under tbe act of 1853. This is *prima facie*evidence of her title to tbe pension, and of all tlie' facts that make her title, and there is no conflicting testimony; and tbe certificate also states and proves that payment of tbe pension prior to February, 1853, has not been made.

Tbe remaining questions are questions of law, viz, whether tbe act of February 3, 1853, which extends pensions to widows of soldiers of tbe Devolution married after January, 1800, is to be construed in reference to tbe act of March 4, 1848, which gave pensions to widows of soldiers of tbe Devolution married before January 1, 1800? Secondly, what is tbe effect of tbe two acts when construed together ?

These questions have been heretofore decided in this court in tbe cases of Jane Smith and Lydia Clark, which were in all respects like this; and for tbe reasons set forth in those cases we adjudge that tbe petitioner is entitled to her pension of $80 per year from tbe 4th day of March, 1848, to the 3d day of February, 1853, amounting to $393 33, for which judgment is to be allowed for the petitioner.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2183 

To require the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to consider 

Brunswick County, North Carolina, to be part of the same metropolitan 

statistical area as Wilmington, North Carolina. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 30, 2015 

Mr. ROUZER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To require the Director of the Office of Management and 

Budget to consider Brunswick County, North Carolina, 

to be part of the same metropolitan statistical area as 

Wilmington, North Carolina. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BRUNSWICK COUNTY. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi5 sion of law, for the purpose of the delineation of metropoli6 tan statistical areas, the Director of the Office of Manage7 ment and Budget shall consider Brunswick County, North 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2183 IH

1 Carolina, to be part of the same metropolitan statistical 

2 area that contains Wilmington, North Carolina. 

3 (b) SUNSET.—Subsection (a) shall cease to be effec4 tive on January 1, 2021. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE THREE AND
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,909
<SECURITIES>                                     1,531
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,561
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (4,170)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,784
<PP&E>                                          47,804
<DEPRECIATION>                                (32,565)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  88,182
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,524
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            5,239
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        94,082
<OTHER-SE>                                    (43,828)<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    88,182
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               138,886
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  122,442
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   634<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,944
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 126
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,952
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,333
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,213
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,213
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08<F3>
<FN>
<F1>ACCUMULATED DEFICIT & CUMULATIVE TRANSLATION ADJUSTMENT.
<F2>OTHER INCOME, NET OF EXPENSES.
<F3>INCLUDES DIVIDENDS AND ACCRETION ON MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCK.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 4

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF
        CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In  connection  with the  report of  Canadian  Natural  Resources  Limited  (the
"Company")  on the Form 40-F for the fiscal  year  ending  December  31, 2007 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Steve W. Laut,  certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

DATED this 27th day of March, 2008.



CANADIAN NATURAL RESOURCES LIMITED


By:    /S/ Steve W. Laut
       ---------------------------------------------------
       Name:  Steve W. Laut
       Title: President and Chief Operating Officer
              (Principal Executive Officer)
#### Michael O’Haley v. Mary O’Haley.

The 8th section of the act of 6th January, 1841, concerning divorce and alimony, reads as follows: “If the wife, whether complainant or defendant, has not a sufficient income for her maintenance during the pendency of the suit for a divorce, the judge may allow her a sum for her support proportional to the means of the husband, until a final decree shall be made in the case.” (Paschal’s Dig., Art. 3456, Note 802.) Where an order for alimony was made under this section, with which the husband failed to comply, and at the trial the jury found against the wife’s application for a divorce, an execution cannot be issued to enforce the allowance.

The order for alimony is stated on the ground that the wife’s complaint is true; if the jury find against her, the order and all its consequences fall to the ground.

Appeal from Live Oak. The ease was tried before Hon. Benjamin F. Heal, one of the district judges.

The only fact on which the case was decided is sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.

*503Ho brief for the appellant has been furnished to the *Reporter.*

*L. 8.- Lawhon,*for the appellee,

relied upon Wright v. Wright, 6 Tex., 29.

Morrill, O. J.

—Mrs. O’Haley instituted suit against her husband for a divorce, and also applied for alimony. The judge allowed $15 per month for alimony. On the trial for divorce the jury negatived her charges, and the divorce was not granted.

It seems that the alimony was not paid, and the matter in controversy is, whether, under the circumstances, an execution in favor of the wife against her husband ought to be issued for the amount ordered to be paid.

Order for alimony in the first instancé was granted, because the presumptions were that the applicant stated facts. And after the verdict of the jury removed this presumption, and thus made it appear that the order had been granted in consequence of false representations, it was the duty of the court to rescind and nullify not only the order so issued, but all the consequences thereof.

The case of Wright v. Wright, 6 Tex., 29, contains principles that are decisive in this case.

Adopting-the points therein decided as law, of which we have no doubt, the judge erred in directing the amount decreed for alimony to be collected by execution. Wherefore the judgment is reversed, and cause

Dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                            462,441
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                     226,870
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                       140,253
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,040,043
<PP&E>                         10,997,505
<DEPRECIATION>                    487,779
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 11,646,640
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           3,383,180
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                            7,159
<OTHER-SE>                      6,429,351
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   11,646,640
<SALES>                           610,509
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  610,509
<CGS>                             265,487
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     959,963
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 72,716
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (349,454)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (349,454)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                     (349,454)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                        (.05)
        


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT23.1**

 

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by referencein this Annual Report on Form 10-K, in the Registration statement onForm S-3 (No. 333-85808), the Registration statement on Form S-8(No. 333-75792), and the Registration statement on Form S-8(No. 333-75788) of our report dated January 31, 2003, on our audit ofthe financial statements of Precis, Inc.

 
| /s/ MURRELL, HALL, McINTOSH & CO.,  PLLP. |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                               |
| Norman, Oklahoma                                   |
| April 15, 2005                                     |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000, AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE PERIOD
THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          29,214
<SECURITIES>                                   172,369
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,629
<ALLOWANCES>                                       284
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               150,369
<PP&E>                                          10,580
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,377
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 220,491
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,037
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           250
<OTHER-SE>                                     197,824
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   220,491
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,559
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,353
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,125
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   120
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (16,347)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       137
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,484)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (16,484)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.69)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Secure Computing Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Timothy P. McGurran, Chief Operating Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2003, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Timothy P. McGurran              
|Timothy P. McGurran                  
|President and Chief Operating Officer
|November 8, 2004
# C_2021459EN.01002901.xml

| 12.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 459/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 459/29

---

EUROPEAN UNION AGENCY FOR RAILWAYS

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2020

(2021/C 459/29)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://www.era.europa.eu/agency/management-board/management-board-decisions_en

---
# C_2021360EN.01000101.xml

| 8.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 360/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 360/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10410 — SEGRO/PSPIB/Target Asset in Hamburg)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 360/01)

On 1 September 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10410. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10410. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 

_________________________________ 

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 

Complainant 

vs. 

SANTOS FERNANDEZ ZAPATA-CHAMORRO 

Respondent 

_________________________________ 

Docket Number 2023-0427 

Enforcement Activity No. 7809346 

CONSENT ORDER 

Issued: December 5, 2023 

By Administrative Law Judge: Honorable Timothy G. Stueve 

Appearances: 

Jesus Porrata 

Sector Miami 

For the Coast Guard 

Santos Fernandez Zapata-Chamorro, Pro Se 

For Respondent 
CONSENT ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 

 On or about November 22, 2023, the parties in this case submitted a Motion for Approval 

of Settlement Agreement and Entry of Consent Order to be approved as a settlement of the case 

under 33 C.F.R. § 20.502. 

 I have carefully reviewed the terms of the Settlement Agreement and find it is fair and 

reasonable and in substantial compliance with the requirements of 33 C.F.R. § 20.502. 

ORDER 

 Upon consideration of the record, it is hereby ORDERED, the Settlement Agreement is 

APPROVED in full and incorporated herein by reference. This Consent Order shall constitute 

full, final, and complete adjudication of this proceeding. 

Done and dated December 5, 2023, at 

Alameda, California 

 

 

 _____________________ 

 Timothy G. Stueve 

 Administrative Law Judge 

 U.S. Coast Guard
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 20, 2014

No. 04-14-00532-CR

Paul AGUILAR,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR5627

Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s brief was originally due September 22, 2014, but was not filed. This court 

notified appellant=s counsel of the deficiency on September 29, 2014. See TEX. R. APP. P.

38.8(b)(2). On October 9, 2014, appellant responded by filing a motion for extension of time, 

requesting additional time to file the appellant’s brief. We granted appellant’s motion and 

ordered appellant to file his brief in this court on or before November 10, 2014. Neither the brief 

nor motion to extend time to file the brief has been filed. 

Accordingly, we ORDER Patrick Barry Montgomery to file the appellant’s brief in 

this court on or before December 22, 2014. Counsel is advised that no further extensions of 

time will be granted absent written proof of extraordinary circumstances — and counsel is 

advised that a heavy workload is not an extraordinary circumstance. If the brief is not filed on or 

before the date ordered, the court will abate this appeal and remand the case to the trial court for 

a hearing to determine whether appellant or his counsel has abandoned the appeal. 

We further order the clerk of this court to serve this order on counsel by first class 

United States mail and by certified mail, return receipt requested, with delivery restricted to 

addressee only, or give other personal notice of this order with proof of delivery. A copy of the 

order should also be served on the other parties and the trial court. 
_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 20th day of November, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2294 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2294

To amend title 38, United States Code, to make memorial headstones and 
    markers available for purchase on behalf of members of reserve 
  components who performed inactive duty training or active duty for 
               training but did not serve on active duty.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 13, 2015

  Mr. Sean Patrick Maloney of New York introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to make memorial headstones and 
    markers available for purchase on behalf of members of reserve 
  components who performed inactive duty training or active duty for 
               training but did not serve on active duty.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Honor Guardsmen and Reservists 
Act''.

SEC. 2. AVAILABILITY FOR PURCHASE OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 
              MEMORIAL HEADSTONES AND MARKERS FOR MEMBERS OF RESERVE 
              COMPONENTS WHO PERFORMED CERTAIN TRAINING.

    Section 2306 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(i)(1) The Secretary shall make available for purchase a memorial 
headstone or marker for the marked or unmarked grave of an individual 
described in paragraph (2) or for the purpose of commemorating such an 
individual whose remains are unavailable.
    ``(2) An individual described in this paragraph is an individual 
who--
            ``(A) as a member of a reserve component performed inactive 
        duty training or active duty for training, but did not serve on 
        active duty; and
            ``(B) is not otherwise ineligible for a memorial headstone 
        or marker on account of the nature of the individual's 
        separation from the Armed Forces or other cause.''.
                                 <all>
```