alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals
**San Antonio, Texas**

August 25, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00114

- CV

Zulema GARZA

, Appellant

v.

Zulema J. GARZA , Jose Juan Garza, III, Andres Garza, Alejandro Garza, and Gabriel Garza, Appellees

From the 49th Judicial District Court

, Webb County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2020

- CVK

- 002209

- D1 Honorable Joe Lopez , Judge Presiding



### ORDER

On August 23, 2021, appellant filed her brief. The brief does not comply with Rules 9.4, 9.5, or 38.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 9.4, 9.5, 38.1. Specifically, the brief violates Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.4 because it is not double spaced and does not contain a certificate of compliance stating the numbe r of words in the
document. See id . R. 9.4(d), 9.4(i)(3). The brief also violates Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.5 because it does not certify that appellant served it on appellees’ counsel. See id. R. 9.5(a), (b)(2), (d), (e). Finally, and perhaps mo st importantly, the brief violates Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.1 because it does not contain a statement of facts with citations to the appellate record, a proper legal argument supported by citations to legal authorities and the appellate record, or an appendix containing the trial court’s judgment or other appealable order from which relief is sought. See id. R. 38.1(g), 38.1(i), 38.1(k).

Accordingly, we ORDER appellant’s brief STRICKEN and ORDER appellant to file
an amended brief in this court complying with Rules 9.4, 9.5, and 38.1 by September 14, 2021

. If appellant does not file an amended brief that complies with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure by the date stated in this order, we will dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.
See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.9, 42.3.

____________ _____________________ Beth Watkins , JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 25th day of August, 2021

.

_____________ ______________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ray C. James, Appellant.

Memorandum: The suppression court correctly ruled that defendant’s confession was not the product of an unlawful detention. Probable cause existed for the initial arrest *(see, People v Brnja,*50 NY2d 366, 372-373; *People v Messam,*112 AD2d 449; *People v Davidson,*110 AD2d 776) and, even assuming that such cause lessened after witnesses failed to identify defendant in a lineup and after a participant in the crime failed to implicate defendant continued interrogation of defendant on an unrelated charge was proper *(see, People v Heller,*99 AD2d 787; *People v Sano,*89 AD2d 666; *People v Cypriano,*73 AD2d 902). In any event, an independent reasonable basis existed for interrogation on the unrelated charge.

We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions, and we find them to lack merit. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Celli, J. — robbery, first degree, and grand larceny, third degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Boomer, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Susan Baba, Appellant, v Martin Evans et al., Respondents.

Submitted January 8, 2007;

decided January 16, 2007

Motion by Gilbert Lau for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein denied. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

                    On April 11, 2000, (65 FR 19398), the                     **Federal Register**                     published notice of Petitions and Director's Decisions. On page 19398 there was a notice entitled “Power Authority of the State of New York; Facility Operating License DPR-64 Receipt of Petition for Director's Decision Under 10 CFR 2.206.” The title of this notice should have been “Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.; Facility Operating License DPR-26 Receipt of Petition for Director's Decision Under 10 CFR 2.206.”                 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 11th day of April 2000.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

John A. Zwolinski,

Director, Division of Licensing Project Management, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.

[FR Doc. 00-9623 Filed 4-17-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the annual report of InvestNet, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Norman Koo,
the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/  Norman Koo

Chief Executive Officer

Date:  April 13, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLAR

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      52,916,011
<SECURITIES>                                45,047,338
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           103,786,067
<PP&E>                                      16,408,515
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,445,512
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             136,082,006
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,832,152
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       198,635
<OTHER-SE>                                 124,678,932
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               136,082,006
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,582,217
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,322,511
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             240,984
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,229,867)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,229,867)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,229,867)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.17)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF FIRST COMMONWEALTH, INC. AS OF MARCH 
31, 1997, AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY 
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. 
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         10,094 
<SECURITIES>                                      515 
<RECEIVABLES>                                   3,297 
<ALLOWANCES>                                      350 
<INVENTORY>                                         0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               17,110       
<PP&E>                                          3,534      
<DEPRECIATION>                                  1,870    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 30,581      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           9,671
<BONDS>                                             0  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                         0 
<COMMON>                                            4 
<OTHER-SE>                                     20,719       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   30,581         
<SALES>                                             0          
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               13,463          
<CGS>                                               0          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  12,280          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,290       
<INCOME-TAX>                                      530      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               760      
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0      
<CHANGES>                                           0  
<NET-INCOME>                                      760 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.20 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.20 
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 74 (Monday, April 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 20487]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9427]



[[Page 20487]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decrees Under the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

    Notice is hereby given that on March 14, 2000, a complaint and a 
proposed consent decree in United States and the State of Colorado v. 
Beazer East, Inc. and Butala Construction Company, Civil Action No. 00-
D-561, were lodged with the United States District Court for the 
District of Colorado.
    In this action the United States seeks recovery of approximately 
$631,000 in unreimbursed response costs incurred in relation to 
Operable Unit #2 of the Smeltertown Superfund Site, located near 
Salida, Colorado, under Section 107(a) of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act. The State of 
Colorado seeks recovery of response costs to be incurred at the Site. 
Under the proposed decree, the defendants implement a remedial action 
selected by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, which is 
designed to prevent the further migration of hazardous substances at 
Operable Unit #2, and will reimburse all of EPA's past costs, as well 
as all of EPA's and the State of Colorado's future response costs 
incurred at Operable Unit #2.
    The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication comments relating to the 
proposed consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General of the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20530, and should refer to United 
States and State of Colorado, v. Beazer East, Inc. and Butala 
Construction Company, D.J. Ref. 90-11-3-1522.
    The proposed consent decree may be examined at the Office of the 
United States Attorney, 1961 Stout Street, 11th Floor, Drawer 3608, 
Denver, CO 80294 and at U.S. EPA Region VIII, 999 18th Street, Denver, 
Colorado 8020. A copy of the Decree may be obtained by mail from the 
Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611. In 
requesting a copy, please enclose a check in the amount of $20.00 (25 
cents per page reproduction cost) payable to the Consent Decree 
Library.

Joel M. Gross,
Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 00-9427 Filed 4-14410-15-M
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
Exhibit 14.1  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  To the Board of Directors of Prudential plc:  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-219863) on Form F-3 and the registration statement (No. 333-213731) on Form S-8 of Prudential plc of our report dated 22 March 2018, with respect to the consolidated statements of financial position of Prudential plc as of 31 December 2017 and 2016, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended 31 December 2017, and the related notes, and the disclosures marked audited within the Group Risk Framework section on pages 100 to 119 of the 2017 Form 20-F of Prudential plc, and the condensed financial statement Schedule II (collectively, the consolidated financial statements), and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of 31 December 2017, which report appears in the 31 December 2017 annual report on Form 20-F of Prudential plc.  /s/ KPMG LLPKPMG LLPLondon, United Kingdom22 March 2018
#### MacFarlane, Respondent, *v.*Walter, Appellant.

*(Superior Court of New York City, General Term.*

May 24, 1890.)

Appeal from order denying motion to vacate attachment.

Argued before Sedgwick, C. J., and O’Gorman, J.

*W. T. Birdsall,*for appellant. *F. E. Anderson,*for respondent.

Per Curiam.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs.
#### R. S. Prigeon v. John T. Smith.

A note by which the defendant promised to pay “three hundred seventy-five dollars” in Confederate bonds is void.

Error from Houston. The case was tried before Hon. L. W. Cooper, one of the district judges.

The only fact material to be stated is, that the note was payable “in Confederate bonds.”

*172Eo brief for plaintiff in error has been furnished to the *Reporter.*

Caldwell, J.

—Defendant in error obtained judgment in the court below on a written instrument for $375, in which it is expressed that the consideration is to be discharged in Confederate bonds.

On the authority of Smith v. Smith, decided at Austin term 1867, [30 Tex., 154,] and.Linden v. Barber, at Galveston term, 1868, [not published,] this judgment is reversed, and cause

Dismissed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.3

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

        RAYTEL MEDICAL CORPORATION, a corporation organized and existing under
and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, does
hereby certify as follows:

1. At a meeting of the Board of Directors of said corporation on May 18, 2001,
the following resolutions were duly adopted:

RESOLVED: That the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company shall be amended,
effective as of 8:30 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time on Wednesday, May 23, 2001, to
effect a one-for-three reverse stock split;

RESOLVED FURTHER: That to effect such one-for-three reverse stock split,
paragraph (A) of Article IV of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company
shall be amended to read as follows:

               "(A) The Corporation is authorized to issue two classes of
shares, designated as "Common Stock" and "Preferred Stock," respectively. The
number of shares of Common Stock authorized to be issued is 20,000,000 shares,
$.001 par value per share, and the number of shares of Preferred Stock
authorized to be issued is 2,000,000 shares, $.001 par value per share. Upon the
filing of this Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation, each
three issued and outstanding shares of the Corporation's Common Stock shall be
converted into one share of Common Stock, with any resulting fractional share to
be converted into the right to receive a cash payment in an amount equal to the
value of such fractional share based on the closing price of such Common Stock
on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market on May 23, 2001."

2. The foregoing amendment has been approved by the stockholders of the
Corporation at a duly held meeting of stockholders.

3. Said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section
242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, RAYTEL MEDICAL CORPORATION has caused this
certificate to be signed by its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer this 21st
day of May, 2001.


                                          RAYTEL MEDICAL CORPORATION



                                          By:__________________________________
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Timebeat.com Enterprises Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alexander Vileshin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 (1)
   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 __/s/Thomas L. Crom___________ Thomas L. Crom,
Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Credit Union Administration

# TIME AND DATE:

10:00 a.m., Thursday, September 23, 2021.

# PLACE:

                        Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic, the meeting will be open to the public via live webcast only. Visit the agency's homepage (                        *www.ncua.gov*) and access the provided webcast link.                    

# STATUS:

This meeting will be open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Board Briefing, Share Insurance Fund Quarterly Report.

2. NCUA's 2021 Mid-Session Budget.

3. Oregon Member Business Lending Rule.

4. NCUA Board Agenda.

5. NCUA Rules and Regulations, Subordinated Debt.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks, Secretary of the Board, Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2021-20450 Filed 9-17-21; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7535-01-P
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JA NUARY 8, 2016

NO. 03

- 15

- 00024

- CR

Steven Anthony Roe, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 368TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYE AR, GOODWIN, AND BOU RLAND

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BOURLAND

This is an appeal from the judgments of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgments of conviction . Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgments of

conviction

. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay co sts, no adjudicati on of costs

is made.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 7 I 0 2 36

. SHELLI ELLE S. YOUHOI NG-NANAN v . THE STATE.

Sh el li el l e S. Yo u ho in g -Nan an was ch arg ed wi t h o b s tru ct i ng an o f fi cer. Yo u h o in g -Nan an fi l ed a m o t i o n to rec u s e t h e t ri al ju d g e, wh i ch was d en i ed o n Feb ru ary 6 , 2 0 1 7

. On M a r c h 6 , 2 0 1 7 , Yo u h o i n g -Nan an fi l ed t h i s ap p l i cat i o n fo r i n t erl o cu t o ry ap peal

. 1 Th e St at e h as fi l ed a m o t io n t o d i s m i s s, arg u i n g in t er a l i a t h at Yo u h o in g -Nan an fai led t o co m p l y wi t h t h e req u i s i t e ap p el l at e p ro ced u re. Th e t ri al co u rt ’ s o rd er d en y i n g Yo u h o i n g

- N a n a n’ s m o t i o n t o recu s e i s i n t erl o cu t o ry

. S e e M

u r p h y v. Mu rp h

y , 3 2 2 Ga. Ap p. 8 29 , 8 3 1 -8 3 2 (7 4 7 SE2 d 2 1 ) ( 2 0 1 3 ). An i n t erl o cu to ry o rd er i s n o t ap p eal ab l e wi t h o u t a cert i fi cat e of i m m ed i at e

rev i ew. See OCGA § 5-6 -3 4 (b ); At l a n ta Ha n g g l id er s & U l t ra l i g h t s , In c. v. Ro u n t r ee , 1 6 9 Ga. Ap p

. 6 4 7 , 6 4 7 (3 1 4 SE2 d 6 7 9 ) (1 9 8 4). Here, Yo u h o i n g -Nan an fai l ed t o

o b t ai n a cert i fi cat e o f im m ed i at e rev i e w

. W e t h u s l ack ju ri s d i ct io n t o co ns i d er h er

a p p l i cat i o n fo r i n t erl o cu t o ry ap p eal

. See Mu r p hy , s u p ra. Acco rd i n gl y , t h e St at e’ s

m o ti o n t o d i s m i s s i s GRANTED, an d t h i s ap p l i cat i o n i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m
t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

.

1 Yo u h o i n g -Nan an fi l ed h er ap pl i cat i o n i n t he Su p rem e Co urt , w h i ch t ran s ferred t he m at t er t o t h i s Co u rt

. June 01, 2017

06/01/2017