alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1306 

KA 10-01796 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, FAHEY, CARNI, AND SCONIERS, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

JOANN RUSBY, ALSO KNOWN AS JOANN M. RUSBY, ALSO 

KNOWN AS JOANN VANWUYCKHUYSE, ALSO KNOWN AS 

JOANN SPICER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

GARY A. HORTON, PUBLIC DEFENDER, BATAVIA (BRIDGET L. FIELD OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

LAWRENCE FRIEDMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BATAVIA (WILLIAM G. ZICKL OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Genesee County Court (Robert C.

Noonan, J.), rendered October 6, 2009. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled

substance in the third degree and criminally negligent homicide. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is 

unanimously affirmed. 

Entered: December 23, 2011 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Nicholas Passero, Appellant.

Memorandum: Although a delay of over 18 months occurred between defendant’s arrest and his plea of guilty to the felony charge of driving while intoxicated and related offenses, under the circumstances presented here he was not deprived of his constitutional right to be brought swiftly to trial. Defendant sought or consented to a part of the delay, most of which was attributable to court congestion which "tends to 'weigh less heavily’ on the State when a court evaluates constitutional speedy trial claims” *(People v Watts,*57 NY2d 299, 303). Defendant was not incarcerated while awaiting trial and there is no indication in the record that he had been prejudiced by the delay or that the likelihood of his acquittal was affected thereby. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Egan, J. — driving while intoxicated, and other offenses.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Denman, Green, Pine and Schnepp, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Secure Computing Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John E. McNulty, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|/s/    John E. McNulty              
|------------------------------------
|John E. McNulty                     
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|October 31, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         853,693
<SECURITIES>                                   188,085
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,850,054
<ALLOWANCES>                                   600,153
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,925,096
<PP&E>                                         728,008
<DEPRECIATION>                                 135,974
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,739,413
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,618,313
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        40,300
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,739,413
<SALES>                                     46,474,648
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            46,474,648
<CGS>                                       44,489,075
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               45,988,180
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               164,656
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              68,363
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                509,005
<INCOME-TAX>                                   197,102
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            311,903
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   311,903
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# C_2021197EN.01000501.xml

| 26.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 197/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 197/5

---

Announcement concerning the opening of winding-up proceedings for Československé úvěrní družstvo v likvidaci [Czechoslovak Credit Cooperative in liquidation]

(2021/C 197/05)

EXTRACT FROM THE DECISION ON OPENING WINDING-UP PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO DIRECTIVE 2001/24/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL OF 4 APRIL 2001 ON THE REORGANISATION AND WINDING UP OF CREDIT INSTITUTIONS

Invitation to lodge a claim. Time limits to be observed.

Lukáš Vlašaný, born 28 October 1974, residing at Palackého 351/6, 390 01 Tábor, as liquidator of the savings and credit union Československé úvěrní družstvo v likvidaci, company ID No: 649 46 851, having its registered offices at Gočárova třída 312/52, Pražské Předměstí, 500 02 Hradec Králové, entered in the business register held by the Hradec Králové regional court under reference Dr 1358 (‘the Cooperative’), appointed by decision of the Hradec Králové regional court No 34 Cm 65/2021-15 of 6 April 2021, hereby announces, in accordance with Article 13 and Article 17 of Directive 2001/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reorganisation and winding-up of credit institutions, that the Cooperative went into liquidation on 25 March 2021, when, on the basis of a decision taken by the assembly of delegates of the Cooperation on 25 March 2021, it was decided, within the meaning of Article IX(A)(18)(k) in conjunction with Article IX(B)(1) of the articles of association and in accordance with Section 656(q) and Section 669 of Act No 90/2012 on business corporations, as amended, to wind-up the Cooperative with immediate effect.

Creditors of the Cooperative are invited to lodge their claims by the deadline of 30 July 2021. Claims should be lodged by the said deadline, in writing, with the liquidator of the Cooperative, Lukáš Vlašaný, at Vančurova 2904, 390 01 Tábor, Czech Republic.

Lukáš VLAŠANÝ

Liquidator

Československé úvěrní družstvo v likvidaci

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2196 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2196

   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for an 
increase in the limit on the length of an agreement under the Medicare 
      independence at home medical practice demonstration program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 1, 2015

 Mr. Burgess (for himself, Mr. Roskam, Mr. Thompson of California, Mr. 
  Smith of New Jersey, and Mr. Forbes) introduced the following bill; 
which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition 
      to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for an 
increase in the limit on the length of an agreement under the Medicare 
      independence at home medical practice demonstration program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Independence at Home 
Medical Practice Demonstration Improvement Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN THE LIMIT ON THE LENGTH OF AN AGREEMENT UNDER THE 
              MEDICARE INDEPENDENCE AT HOME MEDICAL PRACTICE 
              DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM.

    Section 1866E(e)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395cc-
5(e)(1)) is amended by striking ``3-year'' and inserting ``5-year''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         548,565
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  582,575
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,179,643
<PP&E>                                       1,275,109
<DEPRECIATION>                                 408,711
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,054,531
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,742,037
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,507
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,362,697
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,054,531
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,249,492
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,682,083
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,779,311
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              87,328
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,211,082)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    36,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 73,262
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,101,820)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.97)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.99)
        

</TABLE>
#### FIRST NAT. BANK OF FRIENDSHIP, Respondent, v. WESTON, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

April, 1896.)

Action by the First National Bank of Friendship, N. Y., against Abijah Weston, survivor, etc.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with §10 costs and disbursements.
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	Southeast (D7)
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4619" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/DOD2/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="aprint factsheet">
    <div class="header">

        <img height="100" class="print-logo" alt="Site Logo" src="/Portals/0/Images/Official USCG Emblem.png?ver=0BEUcC5lxfanFqthfDyaOg%3d%3d" />

        <h1 class="title">Southeast (D7)</h1>
        <h3 class="date">
            Updated: June 27, 2018
        </h3>
    </div>
    
<div id="adetail-slick-gallery" class="gallery">
    
    <div class="item">
        
        <div class="image">
            
            <img src="https://media.defense.gov/2018/Jun/27/2001936374/1920/1080/0/180627-G-OY189-707.PNG"
                 class="aimage img-responsive"
                 alt="District 7: Florida, Georgia, Puerto Rico, South Carolina"
                 itemprop="image" />
        </div>
        
        
        
        
        
        <div class="slide-info-hidden">
            <div class="slide-info-inner">
            
            <div class="image-title">District 7</div>
            <div class="image-caption">District 7: Florida, Georgia, Puerto Rico, South Carolina</div>
        </div>
    </div>
    </div>

    
</div>
<div class="slide-info"></div>





    Seventh District Command Center Number: <span>(305) 415-6800 - For maritime emergency use only </span><br />
</div>

    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION 906
      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with China Kangtai Cactus Bio-Tech Inc.’s (the “Company”) Annual
      Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Jinjiang Wang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects
      the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, another
      document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
      required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company. and will be
      retained by the Company. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.




Dated: April
      15 ,
      2008





/s/
                Jinjiang WangJinjiang
                WangPresident, Chief Executive Officer, Director and Principal Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

       

<ARTICLE>                                                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Galveston's
Steakhouse Inc. financial statements for the 12 months ended December 31, 1997 
and is qualified in its entirety be reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                                JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                  DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                                        64,726
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 156,015
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                   25,411
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              509,204
<PP&E>                                                        905,084
<DEPRECIATION>                                                167,219
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                2,252,033
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         2,847,740
<BONDS>                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   1,000
<COMMON>                                                      8,250
<OTHER-SE>                                                    596,563
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  (1,414,706)
<SALES>                                                       1,867,671
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              1,867,671
<CGS>                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 2,422,451
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            523,187
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               (1,077,967)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           (1,077,967)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  (1,077,963)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 (1.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 (1.36)
        


</TABLE>
#### MALCOLM, Respondent, v. NEW YORK EL. RY. CO. et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.

May 18, 1894.)

Action by James F. Malcolm against the New York Elevated Railway Company and others.

Argued before O’BRIEN, FOLLETT, and PARKER, JJ.

G. T. Aldrich, for appellants.

E. W. Tyler, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
# CI2021509EN.01000101.xml

| 17.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 509/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 509/1

---

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products on 17 December 2021

(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1))

(2021/C 509 I/01)

| — | Issuing of a marketing authorisation (Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council): Accepted













  Date of the decision | Name of the medicinal product | INN (International Non-Proprietary Name) | Holder of the marketing authorisation | Number of the entry in the Community Register | Pharmaceutical form | ATC code (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Code) | Date of notification |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 17.12.2021 | Xevudy | sotrovimab | GlaxoSmithKline Trading Services Limited
  Riverwalk 12, Citywest Business Campus, Dublin 24, Ireland | EU/1/21/1562 | Concentrate for solution for infusion | Pending | 17.12.2021 |

—

Issuing of a marketing authorisation (Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council): Accepted

Date of the decision

Name of the medicinal product

INN (International Non-Proprietary Name)

Holder of the marketing authorisation

Number of the entry in the Community Register

Pharmaceutical form

ATC code (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Code)

Date of notification

17.12.2021

Xevudy

sotrovimab

GlaxoSmithKline Trading Services Limited

Riverwalk 12, Citywest Business Campus, Dublin 24, Ireland

EU/1/21/1562

Concentrate for solution for infusion

Pending

17.12.2021

Anyone wishing to consult the public assessment report on the medicinal products in question and the decisions relating thereto is invited to contact:

| European Medicines Agency |
| --- |
| Domenico Scarlattilaan 6 |
| 1083 HS Amsterdam |
| NETHERLANDS |

European Medicines Agency

Domenico Scarlattilaan 6

1083 HS Amsterdam

NETHERLANDS

---

(1)  OJ L 136, 30.4.2004, p. 1.

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Kendricks, Jr., Appellant.

— Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted *(see, People v Jackson,*124 AD2d 975, *Iv denied*69 NY2d 746). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Bergin, J. — rape, first degree, and sodomy, first degree.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
# C_2021279EN.01000201.xml

| 13.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 279/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/2

---

Withdrawal of notification of a concentration

(Case M.10273 — ArcelorMittal/Liberty Steel France)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 279/02)

On 4 June 2021, the European Commission received notification (1) of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) (‘Merger Regulation’).

On 2 July 2021, the notifying party informed the Commission that it withdrew its notification.

---

(1)  OJ C 226, 14.6.2021, p. 9.

(2)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
datetime,flow volume2015-05-20,415.20661
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 27, 2021. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, May 27, 2021 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A21I0201. BAKER INTERACTIVE SERVICES, LLC v. COLIANT SOLUTIONS, INC.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 18C02190
#### LUDLOW, Respondent, v. JOHNSON et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 6, 1896.)

Action by James B. Ludlow against Dorothy H. G. Johnson and Genie H. Rosenfeld. 38 N. Y. Supp. 1146.

Fettretch, Silkman & Seybel, for appellants.

Henry C. Bryan, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

No objection to this judgment raised by the appellants is of sufficient dignity to require or even justify discussion. If the assignment of his share of the mortgage was improperly obtained from Thomas W. Ludlow by the plaintiff, it was of no concern to the defendants. The assignment was not void, but simply voidable, and voidable only at the election of Thomas W. Ludlow or his personal representatives. The action was properly brought by the plaintiff. The assignment vested in him the whole legal title to the mortgage, and, if any trust was created by the assignment, it was not in the mortgage, hut in the moneys realized from the mortgage. The judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.