alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DAVID ZAVALA,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 17

- 00136

- CR

Appeal from the

120th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20140D05270)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 24TH DAY OF MAY, 2019.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
Exhibit 10.42


 


THE
USE OF THE FOLLOWING NOTATION IN THIS EXHIBIT INDICATES THAT THE CONFIDENTIAL PORTION HAS BEEN OMITTED PURSUANT TO ITEM 601(b)(10)(iv)
WHEREBY CERTAIN IDENTIFIED INFORMATION HAS BEEN EXCLUDED BECAUSE IT IS BOTH NOT MATERIAL AND WOULD LIKELY CAUSE COMPETITIVE HARM IF PUBLICLY
DISCLOSED: [***]


 


AMENDMENT
TO COMPONENTS SUPPLY AGREEMENT


 


This
Amendment to Components Supply Agreement (the “Amendment”) is entered into as of Oct. 23, 2019 (the “Amendment
Effective Date”) by and between QUALCOMM CDMA Technologies Asia-Pacific Pte. Ltd., a Singapore corporation (“QCTAP”)
and Airspan Networks, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Buyer”), who hereby agree to amend that certain Components Supply
Agreement dated November 20, 2014, as amended (the “CSA”) between the parties, as set forth below. Capitalized
terms used in this Amendment shall have the meaning set forth in the CSA, unless otherwise provided herein.


 


1.
Exhibit C, List of Agents. As of the Amendment Effective Date, Exhibit C to the CSA is amended by adding the following
new Agent:


 


[***]


 


2.
No Other Amendment or Modification. Except as expressly set forth in this Amendment, the CSA remains in full force and effect
without modification. The terms and conditions of this Amendment and the CSA shall not be modified or amended except by a writing signed
by authorized representatives of both Parties.


 


3.
Signatures. This Amendment may be executed in identical counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original and,
which taken together, shall be deemed to constitute the agreement when a duly authorized representative of each party has signed a counterpart.
Each party agrees that the delivery of this Amendment by facsimile or in electronic format via email shall have the same force and effect
as delivery of original signatures and that each party may use facsimile, electronic format signatures, and photocopies of signatures
as evidence of the execution and delivery of this Amendment by each party to the same extent that an original signature could be used.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the date first set forth above.


 


	QUALCOMM
    CDMA Technologies

    Asia-Pacific Pte Ltd.	Airspan
    Networks, Inc.
	 	 
	By:
    /s/ Angeline Park                                       	By:
    /s/ Ray Flaherty                                       
	Print
    Name: Angeline Park	Print
    Name: Ray Flaherty
	Title:
    Senior CS Manager	Title:
    Senior Director FP&A


 






    QCTAP Confidential/Proprietary
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 181 (Wednesday, September 22, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 52682]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-20525]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than October 22, 2021.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. First Mid Bancshares Inc., Mattoon, Illinois; to acquire Delta 
Bancshares Company through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Brock Sub, LLC, 
and thereby indirectly acquire Jefferson Bank and Trust Company, both 
of St. Louis, Missouri.
    In addition, Brock Sub, LLC, Mattoon, Illinois; a wholly-owned 
subsidiary of First Mid Bancshares Inc., to merge with Delta Bancshares 
Company, with Brock Sub, LLC surviving and thereby indirectly acquire 
Jefferson Bank and Trust Company. Immediately following the merger, 
Brock Sub, LLC to merge with and into First Mid Bancshares Inc., with 
the latter being the surviving entity.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 17, 
2021.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2021-20525 Filed 9-21-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-50654

Summary Calendar

JON HARLANDALE-GA DOE,

Plaintiff−Appellant,

versus

HARLANDALE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT,

Defendant−Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

No. 5:18-CV-889

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The plaintiff sued for relief under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 

5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 11, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-50654 Document: 00515341197 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/11/2020
No. 19-50654

2

of 1973 and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court properly dismissed for failure 

to exhaust for not invoking the IDEA administrative review process. The court

noted that the “exhaustion requirement applies even if relief is sought under 

other federal laws” such as § 1983. The defendant school district helpfully 

points out that just a few months after the district court entered judgment, this 

court reiterated this exhaustion requirement in McMillen v. New Caney Independent School District, 939 F.3d 640, 645−47 (5th Cir. 2019), petition for cert. 

filed (Jan. 30, 2020) (No. 19-972).

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 19-50654 Document: 00515341197 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/11/2020
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2021 

To prohibit the expenditure of Federal funds to Amtrak. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 23, 2015 

Mr. SALMON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To prohibit the expenditure of Federal funds to Amtrak. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR AMTRAK. 

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no Fed5 eral funds shall be made available to Amtrak. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
U.S. COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

ADVISORY COUNCIL 2023

Judge David A. Tapp, Chair

Nancie Marzulla, Co-chair

EX OFFICIO MEMBERS

Lisa Reyes Brian Corcoran Jon Burd David Harrington

Clerk of Court Chief Special Master Bar Assoc. Past President Bar Assoc. President 

ALTERNATIVE 

DISPUTE 

RESOLUTION

Judge Horn

TAKINGS/ 

TRIBAL 

CLAIMS

Judge Davis

EMERITUS 

LEADERSHIP

Judge Bruggink

INTELLECTUAL 

PROPERTY

Judge Roumel

TAX

Judge Wolski

MILITARY 

CLAIMS/ 

CIVILIAN PAY

Judge Lerner

LIAISON TO 

THE BAR 

ASSOCIATION

Judge Smith

BID PROTEST/ 

CONTRACTS

Judge 

Solomson

VACCINE

Special Master 

Oler

LAW CLERK 

ALUMNI

Meredith 

Miller
Exhibit 10.1
​
AMENDMENT NO. 2021-1
TO THE
GEMMA POWER SYSTEMS, LLC
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
​
The Gemma Power Systems, LLC Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Plan"), is hereby amended effective January 1, 2021 pursuant to Section 8.1 of the Plan, as follows:
​
I.
​
Section 4.1 of the Plan is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following new Section 4.1:
​
4.1Timing of Vesting. Each Eligible Employee’s Deferred Compensation Account for a Plan Year will vest as follows if such Eligible Employee has been continuously employed by the Employer on such date:
For all awards granted on or after January 1, 2021, 50% on the fourth anniversary of the Award Date that the amount is deemed to be credited to the Eligible Employee’s Deferred Compensation Account; 25% on the fifth anniversary of the Award Date that the amount is deemed to be credited to the Eligible Employee’s Deferred Compensation Account; and 25% on the sixth anniversary of the Award Date that the amount is deemed to be credited to the Eligible Employee’s Deferred Compensation Account  
For all awards granted prior to January 1, 2021, 50% on the fifth anniversary of the Award Date that the amount is deemed to be credited to the Eligible Employee’s Deferred Compensation Account; 25% on the sixth anniversary of the Award Date that the amount is deemed to be credited to the Eligible Employee’s Deferred Compensation Account; and 25% on the seventh anniversary of the Award Date that the amount is deemed to be credited to the Eligible Employee’s Deferred Compensation Account  
Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon an Eligible Employee’s Disability or death, except by suicide, such Eligible Employee’s Deferred Compensation Account(s) shall be fully vested.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, if an Eligible Employee is terminated from employment for Cause then any amounts not yet distributed to the Eligible Employee, whether or not vested, shall be forfeited.
For purposes of this Section, an Eligible Employee shall be considered to be continuously employed during any period of an Approved Leave of Absence.
​
​



II.
​
          If there shall be any inconsistency between the provisions of this Amendment No. 2021-1, Amendment No. 2020-1 and the provisions of this Plan, this Amendment No. 2021-1 shall control.
​
​
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment No. 2021-1 to be executed by its duly authorized officer on this 24th day of June, 2021, effective as hereinabove set forth.
​
​
GEMMA POWER SYSTEMS, LLC
​
​
	

	

	


			
	By:
	 
	/s/ David H. Watson

		 
	David H. Watson   

		 
	Chief Financial Officer



​
THE DISMISSED ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY 

Written by: Hearing Office Staff

An enforcement activity is dismissed when the deficiency identified 

is not one that is amenable to simple correction. For instance, a case 

is returned to the program manager with a statement of what is 

deficient when the deficiency is an obvious error such as the cite for 

the violation, the second page of the Field Sobriety Tests (FSTs) 

worksheet is missing and so on. Enforcement activities are dismissed 

when there is insufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case or 

the deficiency is not one that is believed to be quickly or easily 

corrected. An example might be the case in which the operator is 

charged but only the owner can be held responsible under the cited 

regulation and the enforcement activity shows no evidence that the 

owner is known.

A dismissal is not a death knell for the enforcement activity but 

really quite the opposite. A dismissal is without prejudice. This 

means that the unit may endeavor to correct the reason for the 

dismissal and resubmit the enforcement activity for Hearing Office 

adjudication. However there is a caveat. Due process requires timely 

notice to the mariner of the violation. Units should proceed at 

deliberate speed to correct the deficiency and resubmit a dismissed 

enforcement activity so that the necessary due process can be 

afforded to the mariner.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND FOR THE YEAR THEN
ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       4,082,486
<SECURITIES>                                26,357,318
<RECEIVABLES>                                  782,230
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    745,977
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            31,494,265
<PP&E>                                       2,757,758
<DEPRECIATION>                                 504,909
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              34,929,504
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,193,542
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,437
<OTHER-SE>                                  33,310,934
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                34,929,504
<SALES>                                      4,556,861
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,023,523
<CGS>                                        2,386,896
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,755,051
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (568,651)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,162,877)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,162,877)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,162,877)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2021455EN.01000201.xml

| 10.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 455/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 455/2

---

Notice for the attention of a person subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/119/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine

(2021/C 455/02)

The following information is brought to the attention of Mr. Viktor Ivanovych Ratushniak who appears in the Annex to Council Decision 2014/119/CFSP (1) and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 (2) concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine.

1

2

The Council has received information from the Ukrainian authorities that will be considered within the framework of the annual review of the restrictive measures. The above-mentioned person is hereby informed that he may submit a request to the Council to obtain the elements the Council holds in its file regarding his designation, before 30 November 2021, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1.C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1.C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

In this regard, the attention of the person concerned is drawn to the regular review by the Council of the list of designated persons in Decision 2014/119/CFSP and Regulation (EU) No 208/2014.

---

(1)  OJ L 66, 6.3.2014, p. 26.

1

(2)  OJ L 66, 6.3.2014, p. 1.

2

---
#### In re SHEET METAL WORKS.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

December 18, 1896.)

In the matter of the application of the Sheet Metal Works.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with §10 costs and disbursements.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6638

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MANNY DELBORE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief

District Judge. (CR-97-116)

Submitted: June 20, 2002 Decided: June 28, 2002

Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Manny Delbore, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Scott Broyles, Assistant

United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Manny Delbore appeals the district court’s order denying his

motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and

the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

United States v. Delbore, No. CR-97-116 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 26, 2002).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2252 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2252

   To clarify the effective date of certain provisions of the Border 
      Patrol Agent Pay Reform Act of 2014, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 2015

Mr. Hurd of Texas (for himself, Mr. Welch, Mr. Chaffetz, Mr. Cummings, 
Mr. Farenthold, and Mr. O'Rourke) introduced the following bill; which 
    was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To clarify the effective date of certain provisions of the Border 
      Patrol Agent Pay Reform Act of 2014, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF EFFECTIVE DATE OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE 
              BORDER PATROL AGENT PAY REFORM ACT OF 2014.

    (a) In General.--Section 2 of the Border Patrol Agent Pay Reform 
Act of 2014 (Public Law 113-277) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
    ``(i) Effective Date.--Subsections (b), (c), (d), and (g), and the 
amendments made by such subsections, shall take effect on the first day 
of the first pay period beginning on or after January 1, 2016, except 
that--
            ``(1) any provision in section 5550(b) of title 5, United 
        States Code, as added by subsection (b), relating to 
        administering elections and making advance assignments to a 
        regular tour of duty shall be applicable before such effective 
        date to the extent determined necessary by the Director of the 
        Office of Personnel Management; and
            ``(2) the Director may issue regulations as necessary prior 
        to such effective date.''.
    (b) Application.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall be 
deemed to have been enacted on the date of enactment of the Border 
Patrol Agent Pay Reform Act of 2014 (Public Law 113-277).
                                 <all>
```
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

SHANE JOHNSON
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 1327

[ March 5, 2020 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Bernard I. Bober , Judge; L.T. Case No. 19

- 000165

- CF10A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Ian Seldin, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER
, M AY and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Secure Computing Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John E. McNulty, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ John E. McNulty                            
|John E. McNulty                                
|Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|August 3, 2007