alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                                Petsec Energy Ltd
                                  Certification
 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and
        (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Petsec Energy Ltd, an Australian public limited liability
company (the "Company"), hereby certifies that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the
"Report") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated:     May 24, 2004








Name:      Fiona Ann Robertson
Title:     Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter
63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report
or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been
provided to Petsec Energy Ltd and will be retained by Petsec Energy Ltd and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2021509EN.01002201.xml

| 17.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 509/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 509/22

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10435 – REFRESCO GROUP / HANSA-HEEMANN)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 509/13)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Refresco Deutschland Services & IT GmbH & Co. KG (wholly-owned by Refresco Holding B.V., together ‘Refresco’, the Netherlands), jointly controlled by PAI Partners SAS (France) and British Columbia Investment Management Corporation (Canada), |
| --- | --- |

—

Refresco Deutschland Services & IT GmbH & Co. KG (wholly-owned by Refresco Holding B.V., together ‘Refresco’, the Netherlands), jointly controlled by PAI Partners SAS (France) and British Columbia Investment Management Corporation (Canada),

| — | Hansa Heemann AG (‘Hansa Heemann’, Germany). |
| --- | --- |

—

Hansa Heemann AG (‘Hansa Heemann’, Germany).

Refresco acquire(s) within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Hansa Heemann. The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | for Refresco: production and bottling of a large variety of non-alcoholic beverages for private label belonging to retailers and for brand owners under contract manufacturing; |
| --- | --- |

—

for Refresco: production and bottling of a large variety of non-alcoholic beverages for private label belonging to retailers and for brand owners under contract manufacturing;

| — | for Hansa Heemann: production and bottling of non-alcoholic beverages, more specifically carbonated soft drinks (including carbonated sports and energy drinks), packaged mineral water and, to a lesser extent, other types of non-carbonated soft drinks. |
| --- | --- |

—

for Hansa Heemann: production and bottling of non-alcoholic beverages, more specifically carbonated soft drinks (including carbonated sports and energy drinks), packaged mineral water and, to a lesser extent, other types of non-carbonated soft drinks.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10435 – REFRESCO GROUP / HANSA-HEEMANN

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
Exhibit 32

PERIODIC REPORT CERTIFICATION
of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

I,
Dennis C. Pence, Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer of Coldwater Creek Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



/s/ DENNIS C. PENCE Dennis C. Pence
Chairman of the Board of Directors,
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)


March 31,
2010

---

I,
John E. Hayes, III, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Interim Chief Financial Officer of Coldwater Creek Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



/s/ JOHN E. HAYES, III John E. Hayes, III
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and
Interim Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)


March 31,
2010

---



QuickLinks
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Foundation on the Arts and Humanities

# AGENCY:

National Endowment for the Arts.

# ACTION:

Notification of availability.

# SUMMARY:

                        The National Endowment for the Arts is requesting proposals leading to one (1) award of a Cooperative Agreement for a two year pilot project to devise, implement, document, and assess models for the translation of contemporary performance work from Asia, Africa, or Latin America that has a significant text-based element, and the development of educational strategies that will help audiences understand the cultural and social context from which the work emanates. The initiative will also require implementation of a process for dissemination of information about the models, and facilitation of the                               ( print page 20490)                            touring of the identified works to small and mid-sized communities. Eligibility to apply is limited to tax exempt organizations. Endowment funding will be $200,000. A one-to-one match is required. Eligibility to apply for the Cooperative Agreement is limited to tax exempt organizations. Those interested in receiving the solicitation package should reference Program Solicitation PS 00-04 in their written request and include two (2) self-addressed labels. Verbal requests for the Solicitation will not be honored. It is anticipated that the Program Solicitation will also be posted on the Endowment's Web site at  ­http://www.arts.gov.                    

# DATES:

Program Solicitation PS 00-04 is scheduled for release approximately May 2, 2000 with proposals due on May 31, 2000.

# ADDRESSES:

Requests for the Solicitation should be addressed to the National Endowment for the Arts, Grants & Contracts Office, Room 618, 1100 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20506.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

William Hummel, Grants & Contracts Office, National Endowment for the Arts, Room 618, 1100 Pennsylvania, Ave., NW., Washington, D.C. 20506 (202-682-5482).

William I. Hummel, 

Coordinator, Cooperative Agreements.

[FR Doc. 00-9512  Filed 4-14-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
#### James Kevin WARFORD, Appellant, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Appellee.

No. 11-1250.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Aug. 4, 2011.

Filed: Aug. 11, 2011.

James Kevin Warford, Rogers, AR, pro se.

Bahar Azhdari, Marcus M. Crider, John E.B. Gerth, Waller & Lansden, Nashville, TN, for Appellee.

Before LOKEN, BYE, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

*590PER CURIAM.

Arkansas resident James Warford appeals the district court’s1 denial of his motion to remand his diversity action against United Parcel Service, Inc., which had been removed from Arkansas state court. After careful de novo review, *see In re Prempro Prods. Liab. Litig.,*591 F.3d 613, 619 (8th Cir.2010), we conclude that, on its face, the complaint sufficiently demonstrated that the amount in controversy exceeded the jurisdictional amount. Accordingly, we affirm. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The HONORABLE JIMM LARRY HENDREN, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 21, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-60605

Summary Calendar

 

BLANCA LIDIA AQUINO,

Petitioner,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

--------------------

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A74-708-338

--------------------

Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Blanca Lidia Aquino, a native and citizen of Guatemala,

petitions this court for review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ (BIA) affirmance of the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial

of her applications for political asylum and withholding of

deportation. Aquino argues that the evidence was sufficient to

support a finding of past persecution and a well-founded fear of

persecution based on her “imputed” political opinion. She

further asserts that the BIA’s “boilerplate decision” was
No. 02-60605

-2-

improper, that customary principals of international law apply to

her case, and that the BIA abused its discretion in failing to

consider proposed regulations that allegedly authorize asylum

relief to victims of domestic violence.

When, as in this case, the BIA adopts without opinion the

IJ’s decision, this court reviews the IJ’s decision. Mikhael v.

I.N.S., 115 F.3d 299, 302 (5th Cir. 1997). Here, the IJ’s

determination that Aquino had not shown past persecution or a

well-founded fear of future persecution if returned to Guatemala

was supported by substantial evidence. See Ontunez-Tursios v.

Ashcroft, 303 F.3d 341, 350 (5th Cir. 2002); Gomez-Mejia v.

I.N.S., 56 F.3d 700, 702 (5th Cir. 1995).

Aquino’s argument that the BIA’s summary affirmance was

improper lacks merit. See Soadjede v. Ashcroft, 324 F.3d 830,

832-33 (5th Cir. 2003). Similarly, Aquino’s claim that she

should be granted a temporary safe haven in this country fails

since international law does not apply where, as here, there is

controlling legislation. See Gisbert v. United States Attorney

Gen., 988 F.2d 1437, 1447 (5th Cir. 1993). This court lacks

jurisdiction to consider Aquino’s asylum/domestic violence

argument since she failed to present it to the BIA and, thus,

failed to exhaust her administrative remedies with respect to

that claim. See Rodriguez v. INS, 9 F.3d 408, 414 (5th Cir.

1993). 
No. 02-60605

-3-

For the foregoing reasons, Aquino’s petition for review is

DENIED.
<PAGE>


                                                                   Page 18 of 20


                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(g)

REPORT ON ASSERTIONS ON COMPLIANCE WITH SPECIFIED
KEY ALTERNATIVE LOAN PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS -
KEYCORP STUDENT LOAN TRUST 2000 - A
GREAT LAKES EDUCATIONAL LOAN SERVICES, INC.

Year ended December 31, 2001



<PAGE>


                                                                   Page 19 of 20





                        REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report of
Management on Compliance with Specified Key Alternative Loan Program
Requirements, that Great Lakes Educational Loan Services, Inc. (Great Lakes)
complied with the specified requirements of the Subservicing Agreement (KeyCorp
Student Loan Trust 2000-A) between Key Bank USA, National Association and Great
Lakes dated as of June 1, 2000 (Subservicing Agreement) for the year ended
December 31, 2001. Management is responsible for Great Lakes' compliance with
those requirements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's
assertion about Great Lakes' compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about Great Lakes'
compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a
legal determination on Great Lakes' compliance with specified requirements.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Great Lakes complied with the
aforementioned requirements during the year ended December 31, 2001 is fairly
stated, in all material respects.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of the audit
committee and management of Great Lakes Educational Loan Services, Inc.; Bank
One, National Association; Bankers Trust Company; Moody's Investor Services,
Inc.; Standard and Poor's Ratings Services; Fitch IBCA; and Key Bank USA,
National Association, and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone
other than these specified parties.



                                                      Ernst & Young LLP


January 4, 2002
#### Katherine Semon, Respondent, v Kirilos Saridis, Appellant.

— Main, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term (Bradley, J.), entered December 16, 1985 in Albany County, which granted plaintiffs motion for a protective order.

In this matrimonial action, plaintiff initially commenced an action for annulment of the marriage, alleging fraud, and subsequently commenced a divorce proceeding on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment. The parties have no children, plaintiff does not seek maintenance and there is no property subject to equitable distribution. The sole issue on this appeal is whether defendant is entitled to conduct an examination before trial of plaintiff with regard to plaintiffs grounds for annulment or divorce. Special Term found that he is not so entitled.

This court has recently determined that there is no general prohibition against disclosure concerning the merits of matrimonial actions and that restrictions on such disclosure are better left to individual determination *(Nigro v Nigro,*121 AD2d 833, 834). Accordingly, Special Term was not constrained to deny disclosure. Thus, we reverse and remit the matter to Supreme Court to exercise its discretion and decide the motion for a protective order based on the circumstances presented on such motion.

Order reversed, on the law, without costs, and matter *883remitted to Supreme Court for proceedings not inconsistent herewith. Mahoney, P. J., Main, Weiss, Yesawich, Jr., and Levine, JJ., concur.
November 1, 2011

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NOEMY LANDAVERDE, Appellant

NO. 14-11-00143-CV V.

THE ESTATE OF HABIBOLLAH ABEDINZADEH, Appellee

____________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, The Estate of 

Habibollah Abedinzadeh, signed January 18, 2011, was heard on the transcript of the 

record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the 

judgment of the court below AFFIRMED.

We order appellant, Noemy Landaverde, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
1 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 

_________________________________ 

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD, 

Complainant, 

vs. 

ROYCE ALLAN PERRY, 

Respondent. 

_________________________________ 

Docket Number 2023-0378 

CG Enforcement Activity Number 7789814 

CONSENT ORDER 

Issued: November 17, 2023 

By: Honorable George J. Jordan, Administrative Law Judge 

Appearances: 

Ryan Peryea, CWO 

Marine Safety Unit Texas City 

For the Coast Guard 

Royce Allan Perry, Pro se

For the Respondent 
2 

CONSENT ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 

 On November 6, 2023, the parties in this case submitted a Motion for Approval of 

Settlement Agreement and Entry of Consent Order to be approved as a settlement of the case 

under 33 C.F.R. § 20.502. 

 I have carefully reviewed the terms of the Settlement Agreement and find it is fair and 

reasonable and in substantial compliance with the requirements of 33 C.F.R. § 20.502. 

ORDER 

 Upon consideration of the record, it is hereby ORDERED, the Settlement Agreement is 

APPROVED in full and incorporated herein by reference. This Consent Order shall constitute 

full, final, and complete adjudication of this proceeding. 

SO ORDERED. 

Done and dated November 17, 2023, 

Seattle, Washington 

_______________________________ 

George J. Jordan

Administrative Law Judge 

United States Coast Guard
Exhibit 10.6


 





STOCK TRANSFER AGREEMENT


 


This Stock Transfer Agreement (this
 “Agreement”) is entered into as of April 16, 2021 by and between ShiftPixy Investments, Inc. (the “Transferor”)
and A.G.P./Alliance Global Partners (the “Transferee”).


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, the Transferor desires to
transfer 2,000,000 shares (the “Shares”) of the common stock of Vital Human Capital, Inc. (the “Company”) to the
Transferee.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto, for
good and valuable consideration which each party acknowledges the receipt of, hereby agree as follows:


 


	1.	Transfer of the Shares.



 


For $6,956.52, the Transferor hereby
transfers to the Transferee the Shares.


 


	2.	Representations and Warranties of the Transferor.



 


The Transferor represents and warrants
that it has full legal capacity and authority to enter into this Agreement and to transfer the Shares to the Transferee hereunder, and
is not bound by any agreement, instrument or governmental order prohibiting such transfer. The Transferor also represents that it is transferring
such interests free and clear of all liens and encumbrances other than those created by the terms of the Company’s organizational
documents or imposed by applicable federal and state securities laws.


 


		3.	Binding Effect.



 


This Agreement shall be binding upon
and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective legal representatives, successors and assigns.


 


		4.	Entire Agreement.



 


This Agreement constitutes the entire
agreement of the parties hereto.


 


		5.	Governing Law.



 


This Agreement shall be governed by
the laws of the State of New York without regard to its conflict of laws principles.


 


		6.	Modification.



 


This Agreement may not be amended or
supplemented at any time unless by a writing executed by the parties hereto.


 


		7.	Headings.



 


The headings in this Agreement are
solely for convenience or reference and shall not affect its interpretation.


 






     


     


    

 


 


		8.	Counterparts; Facsimile.



 


This Agreement may be executed in any
number of counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed to be an original and all of which taken together shall constitute
one and the same instrument. This Agreement or any counterpart may be executed via facsimile or other electronic transmission, and any
such executed facsimile or electronic copy shall be treated as an original.


 


[The balance of this page is intentionally left page.]


 






    2


     


    




 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have
executed this Agreement as of the date first set forth above.


 


	 	Transferor:
	 	 
	 	 	SHIFTPIXY INVESTMENTS, INC.
	 	
	 	 	By:	 /s/ Scott W. Absher
	 	 	Name: Scott W. Absher
	 	 	Title:   Chief Executive
    Officer
	 	 
	 	Transferee:
	 	 
	 	 	A.G.P./Alliance Global Partners 
	 	 
	 	 	By:	                                
	 	 	Name: Thomas Higgins
	 	 	Title: Managing Director




 



    3
----

----

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: April 30, 2010                  |   |                                                 |
|---------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                                  |   |                                                 |
|                                  |   |                                                 |
|                                  |   |                                                 |
|                                  |   |                                                 |
|   /s/ Thomas X. Geisel           |   |   /s/ Robert B. Crowl                           |
| Thomas X. Geisel                      |   | Robert B. Crowl                                      |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|                                  |   |                                                 |

----

----