alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1




PERICOM
SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with this quarterly report of Pericom Semiconductor Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended January 1, 2011 (the
“Report”), I, Alex C. Hui, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
knowledge:




(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and




(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
and for the periods indicated.





February
7, 2011





By:
              /s/ Alex C. HuiAlex
      C. HuiChief
      Executive OfficerPericom
      Semiconductor Corporation
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2382 

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to authorize 

a parent to opt their child out of participation in certain assessments 

required under such Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 15, 2015 

Mr. REED (for himself, Ms. DELAURO, and Mr. GIBSON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 

Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act 

of 1965 to authorize a parent to opt their child out 

of participation in certain assessments required under 

such Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Enable More Parents 

5 to Opt-Out Without Endangering Resources Act’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2382 IH

1 SEC. 2. ASSESSMENT OPT-OUT FOR CERTAIN STUDENTS. 

2 Section 1111(b)(2) of the Elementary and Secondary 

3 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6311(b)(2)) is amend4 ed— 

5 (1) in subparagraph (C)(iv), by inserting ‘‘sub6 ject to subparagraph (L),’’ before ‘‘measures the 

7 progress’’; 

8 (2) in subparagraph (I)(ii), by inserting ‘‘, and 

9 the 95 percent requirement described in this clause 

10 shall exclude any student who, pursuant to subpara11 graph (L), opts out of the assessments’’ after ‘‘about 

12 an individual student’’; and 

13 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

14 ‘‘(L) OPT-OUT FOR CERTAIN STUDENTS.— 

15 Upon the request of the parent of a student, 

16 and for any reason stated by the parent, a 

17 State shall allow the student to opt out of the 

18 assessments described in paragraph (3). Such 

19 an opt-out, or any action related to it, may not 

20 be used by the Secretary, the State, any State 

21 or local agency, or any school leader or em22 ployee as the basis for any corrective action, 

23 penalty, or other consequence against the par24 ent, the student, any school leader or employee, 

25 or the school.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Steve E. SAMPSON, Private, U. S. Army, Appellant.

No. 30,358.

U. S. Court of Military Appeals.

Aug. 22, 1975.

*Lieutenant Colonel James Kucera*and *Captain Theodore H. Watts*were on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Captain Gary F. Thorne*and *Captain Clement L. Hyland*were on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

OPINION OP THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

To counter appellant’s testimony raising a defense to the offenses for which he was being tried, the trial counsel offered as impeachment evidence a DA Form 20B1 reflecting appellant’s previous conviction of a crime of moral turpitude.2 Without defense objection, the trial judge accepted the proffered exhibit and advised the court members that they could consider the prior conviction as impeachment evidence.

Because the DA Form 20B affirmatively established that the prior conviction still was undergoing appellate review,3 the trial judge erred by permitting the trial counsel to bring the conviction to the court members’ attention. *See*paragraph 153b (2)(b), Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1969 (Rev.). Since the previous conviction undoubtedly affected appellant’s credibility in the eyes of the jury and hence jeopardized his defense on the merits, the findings of guilty cannot be sustained. Article 59(a), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 859(a).

The decision of the United States Army Court of Military Review is reversed. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army. A rehearing may be ordered.

1

. Department of the Army Form 20B (Insert Sheet to DA Form 20), Record of Court-Martial Conviction.

2

. Paragraphs 138g and 153b (2)(b), Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1969 (Rev.).

3

. *United States v. Heflin,*23 U.S.C.M.A. 505, 50 C.M.R. 644, 1 M.J. 131 (1975).
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2264 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2264

 To amend title 10, United States Code, to establish a space-available 
  transportation priority for veterans of the Armed Forces who have a 
        service-connected, permanent disability rated as total.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 2015

Mr. Bilirakis introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 10, United States Code, to establish a space-available 
  transportation priority for veterans of the Armed Forces who have a 
        service-connected, permanent disability rated as total.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRANSPORTATION ON MILITARY AIRCRAFT ON A SPACE-AVAILABLE 
              BASIS FOR DISABLED VETERANS WITH A SERVICE-CONNECTED, 
              PERMANENT DISABILITY RATED AS TOTAL.

    (a) Availability of Transportation.--Section 2641b of title 10, 
United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (f) as subsection (g); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (e) the following new 
        subsection (f):
    ``(f) Special Priority for Certain Disabled Veterans.--(1) The 
Secretary of Defense shall provide transportation on scheduled and 
unscheduled military flights within the continental United States and 
on scheduled overseas flights operated by the Air Mobility Command on a 
space-available basis for any veteran with a service-connected, 
permanent disability rated as total on the same basis as such 
transportation is provided to members of the armed forces entitled to 
retired or retainer pay.
    ``(2) The transportation priority required by paragraph (1) for 
veterans described in such paragraph applies whether or not the 
Secretary establishes the travel program authorized by this section.
    ``(3) In this subsection, the terms `veteran' and `service-
connected' have the meanings given those terms in section 101 of title 
38.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--Subsection (f) of section 2641b of title 10, 
United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall take effect at 
the end of the 90-day period beginning on the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
LTNITED STATES OF AMERICA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

LINITED STATES COAST GUARD

Complainant

vs.

EDWARD GRIFFIN II

Respondent

Docket Number 2023-01 10

Enforcement Activity No. 7641448

CONSENT ORDER

Issued: March 28. 2023

Bv Administrative Law Judse: Honorable Timothv G. Stueve

Appearances:

CWO John Landry

USCG Sector Virginia

For the Coast Guard

li

Edward Griffin II, Pro Se

For Respondent
CONSENT ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

On or about March22,2023, the parties in this case submitted a Motion for Approval of

Settlement Agreement and Entry ofConsent Order to be approved as a settlement ofthe case

under 33 C.F.R. $ 20.502.

I have carefully reviewed the terms of the Settlement Agreement and find it is fair and

reasonable and in substantial compliance with the requirements of33 C.F.R. $ 20.502.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the record, it is hereby ORDERED, the Settlement Agreement is

APPROVED in full and incorporated herein by reference. This Consent Order shall constitute

full, final, and complete adjudication of this proceeding.

Done and dated March 28, 2023, at

Alameda, Califomia

Timothy G. Stueve

Adminisrative Law Judge

U.S. Coast Guard

ryfu*
EXHIBIT 32

1350 CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and
Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Shirley Singleton, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Edgewater Technology, Inc. (the Company), and Kevin R. Rhodes, the Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of her or his knowledge:

The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2007, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the Periodic Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company for the
period covered by the Periodic Report.



|                     |  |  |  |                                                
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Date: March 17, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ SHIRLEY SINGLETON                          
|                     |  |  |  | Shirley Singleton                              
|                     |  |  |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer



|                     |  |  |  |                                                                     
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 17, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ KEVIN R. RHODES                                                 
|                     |  |  |  | Kevin R. Rhodes                                                     
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and
accounting officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-03-1998
<CASH>                                      12,484,502
<SECURITIES>                                11,764,689
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            24,362,688
<PP&E>                                      13,609,426
<DEPRECIATION>                                 255,529
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              48,185,467
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,258,636
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       130,262
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,057,954
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                48,185,467
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,872,731
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             179,297
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,872,731)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,872,731)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.65)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.65)
        

</TABLE>
Listen

# Event Calendar

View Commission business meeting dates for 2024

----

-    First  
-    Previous  
-   ...  
-  2 
-  3 
-  4 
-   ...  
-   Next  
-   Last  

-  Event Calendar 
-  Public Briefings 
-  Commission Business Meetings 
-  Advisory Committees Meetings 
-  Archives 

## Filter Options
T'NITED STATES OF AMERICA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURJTY

UNITED STATES COAST CUARD

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD,

Complainant,

vs.

LUISITO EVEA LAGUADOR,

Respondent.

Docket Numtrer 2023-0152

CG Enforcement Activity Number 7639714

CONSENT ORDER

Bv: Honorable Walter J. Brudzinski, Chief Administrative Law Judse

Issued: Mav 5. 2023

il Appearances:

MR. WILLIAM E. TAYLOR

USCG Sector Honolulu

For the Coast Guard

LUISITO EVEA LAGUADOR,PTo se

For the Respondent
ENT O VING SE AGREEME

On April 27, 2023, the parties in this case submitted a Motion for Approval of Settlement

Agreement and Entry ofConsent Order to be approved as a settlement ofthe case under 33

c.F.R. S 20.502.

I have carefully reviewed the terms of the Settlement Agreement and find it is fair and

reasonable and in substantial compliance with the requirements of33 C.F.R. $ 20.502.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the record, it is hereby ORDERED, the Seftlement Agreement is

APPRO\aED in full and incorporated herein by reference. This Consent Order shall constitute

full, final, and complete adjudication of this proceeding.

Done and dated May 5,2023

New York, NY

ue.// s/,-r--A

HON. WALTER J. BRUDZINSKI

CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JTIDGE

IJNITED STATES COAST GUARD

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM COBBLESTONE
HOLDINGS, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       6,578,946
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,150,765
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,837,843
<INVENTORY>                                  2,202,481
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,550,376
<PP&E>                                     154,688,669
<DEPRECIATION>                              15,147,666
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             168,498,105
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,317,262
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       42,241,169
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,224
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,516,922)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               168,498,105
<SALES>                                     14,412,413
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            62,122,020
<CGS>                                        6,472,097
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               54,382,104
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               151,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          11,691,072
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,211,800)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   209,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,420,800)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            (3,520,402)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,941,202)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jesus Bigio, Appellant.

— Yesawieh, Jr., J.

Defendant, an inmate at Adirondack Correctional Facility, pleaded guilty to intentionally stabbing a fellow inmate in the leg with a sharpened steel shank, in violation of Penal Law § 120.05 (7). Though defendant was dealt with as having been previously convicted of a felony, it is undisputed that a predicate felony statement was not filed or provided to him; that he neither acknowledged the legitimacy of any prior felony conviction nor was asked to controvert it; and that no hearing to determine the propriety of any such conviction was conducted. Since the provisions of CPL 400.21 have not been observed, resentencing is required *(see, People v King,*114 AD2d 650, 652).

Judgment reversed, on the law, sentence imposed vacated, and matter remitted to the County Court of Essex County for resentencing in accordance with CPL 400.21. Kane, J. P., Main, Yesawieh, Jr., Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 7648

ALBERT G. GURKIN, SR. , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. BARNEY OWENS; NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY , Respondents

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Dever III , District Judge. ( 5:21

- hc

- 02069

- D )

Submitted : February 17, 2022 Decided: February 23, 2022

Before AGEE and RUSHING , Circuit Judges , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Albert G. Gurkin, Sr. , Appellant Pro Se

.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Albert G. Gurkin, Sr., seeks to app eal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition as an unauthorized, successive § 2254 petition . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When , as here, the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both
that th e dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000))

. Limiting our review of the record to the issues raised in Gurkin’s informal brief , we
conclude that Gurkin has not made the requisite showing. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); see also Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) ( “ The informal brief is a n important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that
brief. ” )

. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contention s are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001018756
<NAME> C RHK, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
| **EXHIBIT 21**                                  |
|-------------------------------------------------|
| Subsidiaries                                    |
|                                            |   |   |   |   |
| Name                                            |   | Jurisdiction |   | Trade Name of Organization |
|                                            |   |   |   |   |
| CBCA Care Management, Inc.                      |   | New York |   | CareGuide |
|                                            |   |   |   |   |
| CCS Consolidated, Inc.                          |   | Delaware |   | CareGuide |
|                                            |   |   |   |   |
| Coordinated Care Solutions, Inc.                |   | Delaware |   | CareGuide |
|                                            |   |   |   |   |
| Coordinated Care Solutions IPA, Inc.            |   | New York |   | CareGuide |
|                                            |   |   |   |   |
| Coordinated Physician Solutions, Inc.           |   | Delaware |   | CareGuide |
|                                            |   |   |   |   |
| CCS New Jersey, Inc.                            |   | Delaware |   | CareGuide |
|                                            |   |   |   |   |
| Coordinated Care Solutions of Connecticut, Inc. |   | Delaware |   | CareGuide |
|                                            |   |   |   |   |
| CCS/CG Holdings Corp.                           |   | California |   | CareGuide |
|                                            |   |   |   |   |
| Careguide, Inc.                                 |   | California |   | CareGuide |
|                                            |   |   |   |   |
| Coordinated Care Solutions of Texas, Inc.       |   | Texas |   | CareGuide |
|                                            |   |   |   |   |
| Haelan Corporation                              |   | Indiana |   | CareGuide |
|                                            |   |   |   |   |
| IHS Network Services, Inc.                      |   | Delaware |   | CareGuide |
|                                            |   |   |   |   |
| CCS Merger Corp.                                |   | Delaware |   | CareGuide |
|                                            |   |   |   |   |
| Professional Review Network, Inc.               |   | Florida |   | CareGuide |