alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             631
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           13147
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        950
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                          88104
<ALLOWANCE>                                        971
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  110110
<DEPOSITS>                                       69164
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               2641
<LONG-TERM>                                      12810
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            17
<OTHER-SE>                                       25478
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  110110
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   7350
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  797
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  8147
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                3473
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                4183
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             3964
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       70
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   2890
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1796
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        1796
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1139
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.70
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.72
<LOANS-NON>                                         71
<LOANS-PAST>                                        84
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   252
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   1008
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   919
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       18
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  971
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               826
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            145
        

</TABLE>
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2240 

To amend the Inspector General Act of 1978 relative to the powers of 

the Department of Justice Inspector General. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 5, 2015 

Mr. RICHMOND (for himself, Mr. JODY B. HICE of Georgia, and Mr. LABRADOR) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To amend the Inspector General Act of 1978 relative to 

the powers of the Department of Justice Inspector General. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Inspector General Ac5 cess Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INVESTIGATIONS OF DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

7 PERSONNEL. 

8 Section 8E of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 

9 U.S.C. App.) is amended— 

10 (1) in subsection (b)— 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2240 IH

1 (A) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘and 

2 paragraph (3)’’; 

3 (B) by striking paragraph (3); 

4 (C) by redesignating paragraphs (4) and 

5 (5) as paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively; and 

6 (D) in paragraph (4), as redesignated, by 

7 striking ‘‘paragraph (4)’’ and inserting ‘‘para8 graph (3)’’; and 

9 (2) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘, except with 

10 respect to allegations described in subsection 

11 (b)(3),’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  Schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  (a)
Financial  Statements as of December 31, 1998 and for the year then ended and is
qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to such (b) Form 10-KSB for the year
ended December 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0001017655
<NAME>                          SALES ONLINE DIRECT INC


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998

<CASH>                                         505
<SECURITIES>                                   3,548
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4,053
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 716,643
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          23,697
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       170,422
<OTHER-SE>                                     522,524
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   716,643
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               24
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               665,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (663,608)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (663,608)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (323,537)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (987,145)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.07)



</TABLE>
#### Anderson *v.*Tomkins.

(Supreme *Court, Special Term, New*York *County.*

September 30, 1889.)

Attachment—Deposit in Lieu op Bail—Action against Clerk.

Code Civil Proc. N. *Y.*§ 677, which provides that plaintiff in attachment may, by leave of court, bring any action in the name of himself and the sheriff that the sheriff might bring to recover property attached or its value or on an undertaking, does not authorize plaintiff to bring such action against the clerk to recover money deposited by defendant in lieu of bail.

Action by Byron W. Anderson against George Tomkins for broker’s commissions. Plaintiff moves for leave to sue the clerk for money deposited by defendant in lieu of bail. Code Civil Proc. N. Y. § 677, provides that plaintiff in attachment, “by leave of the court, * * * may bring and maintain in the name of himself and the sheriff jointly, by his own attorney, and at his own expense, any action which, by the provisions of this title, may be brought by the sheriff to recover property attached or the value thereof, or a demand attached, or upon an undertaking given as prescribed in that title, by a person other than the plaintiff.”

*40
      *Henry Pressprich,*for plaintiff. *Wilcox & Goodwin,*for defendant.

Barrett, J.

The provisions of sections 677 and 678 of the Code of Civil Procedure are not applicable to money deposited in court in lieu of bail, and the court cannot permit an action against its clerk for obedience of its lawful orders. The money so deposited came within the provisions of another system, namely, those with regard to arrest and bail. The attachment creditor might ask to be heard before the money so deposited is ordered to be paid over to the third person, under section 586. He must also ask for directions or instructions to the clerk, but the matter cannot be impleaded in an ordinary action, and subjected to damages and costs for simply doing his duty under judicial order. This is an attempt on the plaintiff’s part to sue the court through its officer. The money is in court, and can be withdrawn by the order or direction of the court. The application must therefore be denied.
<Page>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.24

                                [CCC Letterhead]

                                  July 16, 2001

Mr. Mark Rosen
Managing Director
Charlesbank Capital Partners
600 Atlantic Avenue - 26th Floor
Boston, MA 02210-2203

          Re: EXECUTIVE LOAN ARRANGEMENT

Dear Mark:

          This letter will commemorate our understanding that effective February
1, 2001, Charlesbank Capital Partners will provide to CCC the services of Andrew
Janower, Brandon White and Ryan Carroll, or such other of your employees as you
may designate and are acceptable to us ("Loaned Executives"). We expect that in
the aggregate, such services from all Loaned Executives will average
approximately one (1) "person" day per week, but we may mutually agree on a
greater or lesser amount of resources. Loaned Executives will work as our agents
together with our senior management, including the Office of General Counsel,
and outside counsel for the Company, and you will clearly communicate to them
that they are to follow our directions and keep confidential all documents and
information regarding our affairs, except for such disclosure as we may
authorize. Initially, Loaned Executives will be assigned to advise senior
management, work with counsel for the Company and participate in decision-making
regarding financing, closing of our consumer services business, and our
International operations including any activities involving Hearst and the
Enterstand Joint Venture.

          This arrangement shall continue until terminated by either of us.
During the period from February 1, 2001 until termination, we will reimburse you
for the percentage of your costs representing our utilization of the time of the
Loaned Executives, plus all out-of-pocket expenses incurred by you in connection
with their work for us or similarly incurred by them and for which you
reimbursed them. Aggregate compensation to be paid to Charlesbank Capital
Partners by CCC shall not exceed $50,000.

          Please confirm that this letter accurately reflects the arrangement
between us by signing and returning the enclosed copy of this letter.

                                          Very truly yours,


                                          /s/ Robert S. Guttman

<Page>

Agreed and confirmed this 31st day July, 2001
Charlesbank Capital Partners

By: Mark A. Rosen
    ----------------------------------------
    Managing Director
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2342 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2342

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for the participation 
   of physical therapists in the National Health Service Corps Loan 
               Repayment Program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 14, 2015

  Mr. Shimkus (for himself and Ms. DeGette) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for the participation 
   of physical therapists in the National Health Service Corps Loan 
               Repayment Program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Physical Therapist Workforce and 
Patient Access Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE CORPS; PARTICIPATION OF PHYSICAL 
              THERAPISTS IN LOAN REPAYMENT PROGRAM.

    (a) Mission of Corps; Definition of Primary Health Services.--
Section 331(a)(3)(D) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 
254d(a)(3)(D)) is amended by striking ``or mental health,'' and 
inserting ``mental health, or physical therapy,''.
    (b) Loan Repayment Program.--Section 338B of the Public Health 
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254l-1) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ``and physician 
        assistants;'' and inserting ``physician assistants, and 
        physical therapists;''; and
            (2) in subsection (b)(1)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (A), by inserting before the 
                semicolon the following: ``, or have a doctoral or 
                master's degree in physical therapy'';
                    (B) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ``physical 
                therapy,'' after ``mental health,''; and
                    (C) in subparagraph (C)(ii), by inserting 
                ``physical therapy,'' after ``dentistry,''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Q.E.P. Co., Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending February 29, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Marc P. Applebaum, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition, and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Marc P. Applebaum                            
|Marc P. Applebaum                                
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



May
19, 2004



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Q.E.P. Co., Inc. and will be retained by Q.E.P. Co., Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-20703 and No. 333-32945) pertaining to the 1993 Incentive
Stock Plan of SoloPoint, Inc. of our report dated Febraury 10, 1998, with
respect to the financial statements of SoloPoint, Inc. included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended December 31, 1997.



                                  /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Palo Alto, California
March 27, 1998
#### SMITH, Respondent, v. THIRD AVE. R. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

December 22, 1896.)

Action by Frances A. Smith against the Third Avenue Railroad Company.

No opinion. Motion for reargument denied, with §10 costs. See 41 N. Y. Supp. 977.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECUzuTY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

Complainant

vs.

GIANCARLO MAHALIK

Respondent

Docket Number 2023-01 l7

Enforcernent Activity No. 7647724

CONSENT ORDER

Issued: March 28. 2023

Bv Administrative Law Judqe: Honorable Timothv G, Stueve

Appearances:

LT Lawrence Schalles

USCG Sector Charleston

For the Coast Guard

Giancarlo Mahalik, Pro Se

For Respondent
CONSENT ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

On or about March20,2023, the parties in this case submitted a Motion for Approval of

Settlement Agreement and Entry ofConsent Order to be approved as a settlement ofthe case

under 33 C.F.R. $ 20.502.

I have carefully reviewed the terms of the Settlement Agreement and find it is fair and

reasonable and in substantial compliance with the requirements of33 C.F.R. $ 20.502.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the record, it is hereby ORDERED, the Settlement Agreement is

APPROVED in full and incorporated herein by reference. This Consent Order shall constitute

full, final, and complete adjudication of this proceeding.

Done and dated March 28, 2023, at

Alameda, Califomia

Timothy G. Stueve

Administrative Law Judge

U.S. Coast Guard

ryffi*:n
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.16

                [LETTER HEAD OF RMH TELESERVICES APPEARS HERE]
VIA COURIER SERVICE

January 26, 1999


Mr. Paul Burkitt
209 S. Aberdeen Avenue
Wayne, PA 19087

Dear Paul:

We are pleased to offer you the position of Senior Vice President of Sales and
Marketing for RMH Teleservices, Inc. You will be based out of our Bryn Mawr, PA
office and report directly to the Chief Executive Officer.

This will reflect the terms for your joining RMH Teleservices, Inc.

     1.   Base Salary - $200,000 per annum through September 2000. Annual
          -----------
          increases thereafter will be determined by management.

     2.   Start Date - The Start Date will be February 22, 1999.
          ----------

     3.   Annual Bonus - Your annual bonus compensation target will be $100,000,
          ------------
          based on performance goals set by management. For fiscal year 1999,
          your bonus will be prorated 50% of your 1999 target will be guaranteed
          and paid bi-weekly.

     4.   Signing Bonus - You will receive a signing bonus of $20,000, net of
          -------------
          taxes.

     5.   Options - You will be granted options, pursuant to the RMH
          -------
          Teleservices, Inc., 1996 Stock Incentive Plan to purchase 60,000 RMH
          common shares at the closing price on the day of the grant. The
          options for 25% of the shares will vest when you have been employed by
          RMH for one year and an additional 25% of the shares will vest at the
          end of the second, third and fourth year of employment respectively.

     6.   Non-Compete/Confidentiality Agreement - You will enter into a
          -------------------------------------
          non-compete/confidentiality agreement with the company.

     7.   Vacation - Four (4) weeks paid vacation annually.
          --------

     8.   Miscellaneous - You will be issued a company credit card to be used
          -------------
          for all business expenses.
<PAGE>

Mr Paul Burkitt
January 26, 1999
Page Two

     9.   Benefits - You will be eligible to participate in RMH's benefit plan
          --------
          which consists of medical, dental, prescription, vision, life
          insurance, and long term disability insurance is guaranteed during
          your transition. Any COBRA payments will be covered by RMH. Enrollment
          in 401(k) after 1 year of service which includes an employer match as
          defined in the plan.

Please confirm your acceptance by signing and dating the space below. Retain
one copy of the letter for yourself and return the original as soon as possible.

We welcome you to RMH with confidence that our association will be mutually
enjoyable.

Sincerely,



/s/ John A. Fellows
John A. Fellows
Chief Executive Officer


Accepted By:


/s/ Paul Burkitt          2-22-99
---------------------    -----------
Paul Burkitt             Date
Opinion issued July 29, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 13
- 00513
- CR

——————————— CLINTON ANTHONY SUTT ON, JR. , Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 412th District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 68,646

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON PERMANENT ABATEMENT The State has file d a motion to permanently abate this appeal. See T EX
. R.
A PP
. P. 7.1(a)( 2). The State attached to its motion a Certified Abstract of Vital Records, which indicates that appellant Clinton Anthony Sutton, Jr. died on May 5,2

2014 in Palestine, Anderson County, Texas. The death of an appellant during the pendency of an appeal depr ives this court of jurisdiction. See Beard v. State , 108 S.W.3d 304, 304 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). The motion to permanently abate the appeal is granted

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 7.1(a)(2). Therefore, we order the appeal in trial court cause number 68,646
perman ently abated. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Bland, and Massengale. Do not publish. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47.2( b).
1 I n The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

________________

NO. 09

- 1 4

- 003 33

- CR

NO. 09

- 1 4

- 00334

- CR



### ________________

SHATARA MONTENEGRO , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 252nd District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No s. 13

- 15888, 13

- 15889

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pursuant to plea bargain agreement s

, appellant Shatara Montenegro ple ade d

guilty to two charges of aggravated assault

. In each case, t he trial court found the

ev idence sufficient to find Montenegro guilty, but deferred further proceedings,

placed Montenegro on community supervision for five years , and assessed a fine of

$ 1000

. The State subsequently filed a motion to revoke Montenegro ’s

unadj udicated community supervision in each case

. In both cases, Montene gro2 ple ade d “true” to one violation of the conditions of h er community supervision. In

each case, t h e trial court found that Montenegro had violated the conditions of h er

community supervision, found Montenegro guilty of both charges of aggravated

robbery

, and assessed punishment at seven y ears of confinement

. The trial court

ordered that the sentences would run concurrently.

Montenegro’ s appellate counsel filed brief s that present counsel’s

professional evaluation of the record s and conclude the appeal s are frivolous. See

Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1978). On October 13 , 2014 , we granted an extension of time for

Montenegro to file pro se brief s

. We rece ived no response from Montenegro

. W e

have reviewed the appellate record s , and we agree with counsel’s conclusion th at

no arguable issues support the appeal s . Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order

appointment of new counsel to re

- brief the appeal s

. Compare Stafford v. State , 813

S.W.2d 50 3, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court’s judgment s

. 1

1 Montenegro ma y challenge our decision in these case s by filing petition s

for discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.3 AFFIRMED.

________________________________ STEVE McKEITHEN

Chief Justice

Submitted on January 12, 2015

Opinion Delivered February 4, 2015

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen , C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.