alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,378
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,352
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,975)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,301
<PP&E>                                          58,085
<DEPRECIATION>                                (40,278)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  84,549
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,169
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        61,045
<OTHER-SE>                                    (45,784)<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    84,549
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               207,797
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  192,052
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   412<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,017
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,399
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,758
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,361
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                752
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       752
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03<F3>
<FN>
<F1>ACCUMULATED DEFICIT & CUMULATIVE TRANSACTION ADJUSTMENT
<F2>OTHER INCOME, NET OF EXPENSES
<F3>INCLUDES DIVIDENDS AND ACCRETION ON MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCK
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### Donald J. O’Mara III et al., Respondents, v Town of Wappinger, Appellant.

Submitted April 23, 2007;

decided May 1, 2007

Certification of question by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, pursuant to section 500.27 of the Rules of Practice of the Court of Appeals (22 NCYRR 500.27), accepted and the issues presented are to be considered after briefing and argument.

*958Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF EAGLE USA AIRFREIGHT, INC. FOR
THE NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q REPORT.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          23,899
<SECURITIES>                                    10,179
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,316
<ALLOWANCES>                                       924
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                80,143
<PP&E>                                          15,218
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,983
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  92,045
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,541
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            18
<OTHER-SE>                                      70,486
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    92,045
<SALES>                                        200,376
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               200,376
<CGS>                                          112,858
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  112,858
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                69,943
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,923
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,357
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,566
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,566
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.62
        

</TABLE>
#### MURPHY et al., Respondents, v. NEW YORK EL. R. CO. et al., Appellants.

(Superior Court of New York City, General Term.

April 2, 1894.)

Action by James W. Murphy and others against the New York Elevated Railroad Company and another.

Argued before SEDGWICK, C. J., and DUGRO and GILDERSLEEVE, JJ.

Davies & Rapallo, for appellants.

John E. Parsons, for respondents.

GILDERSLEEVE, J.

This is the usual action in equity by the owner of premises abutting upon the defendants’ elevated railroad to restrain the defendants from the further maintenance and operation thereof. Judgment was given at special term awarding past damages, the price of the easements taken by the defendants fixed, and an alternative injunction granted. The questions of fact raised depended upon conflicting testimony. There is sufficient evidence in support of plaintiffs’ contention to sustain the conclusions reached by the learned court at special term, and with such conclusions the general term will not interfere. The trial court was manifestly guided by correct principles of law, and properly applied them. The exceptions to rulings upon questions of evidence are unassailable. We find no valid objection to the judgment. The judgment appealed from must be affirmed, with costs.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-6578-8] 

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

Under the Federal Advisory Act, Public Law 92463, EPA gives notice of a meeting of the Gulf of Mexico Program (GMP) Management Committee (MC). 

# DATES:

The MC meeting will be held on Wednesday, May 10, 2000 from 1:00 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. and on Thursday, May 11, 2000 from 8:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Chateau Sonesta Hotel, 800 Iberville Street, New Orleans, Louisiana, (504) 586-0800. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Gloria D. Car, Designated Federal Officer, Gulf of Mexico Program Office, Building 1103, Room 202, Stennis Space Center, MS 39529-6000 at (228) 688-2421. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Proposed agenda items will include: GMP Workplan Status-Key Milestones and Deliverables for FY 2000, Coordinated Out-year Federal Budget Development follow-up, Gulf of Mexico Regional Panel Workplan implementation discussion, Coastal America Regional Implementation Team joint projects discussion, review of State Coastal Zone Management Agency request for representation on GMP MC, Joint Gulf States Coastal Monitoring Program progress review, Mercury Contamination Report presentation, NOAA coastal programs overview and partnering opportunities discussion, and Communications Committee                           ( print page 20457)                        Report. The meeting is open to the public.                 

Dated: April 6, 2000. 

James D. Giattina, 

Director, Gulf of Mexico Program Office. 

[FR Doc. 00-9390 Filed 4-14-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560-50-U
(8 Misc. Rep. 70.)

#### LOEWENSTEIN et al. v. SCHIFF.

(City Court of New York, General Term.

April 23, 1894.)

•Pleading—Bill op Particulars.

Where plaintiff seeks to avoid a composition made by defendant with his creditors on the ground that defendant, under a secret agreement, paid some' of the creditors more than the others, he will be required to serve a bill of particulars stating the name of such creditors and the dates and amounts of the payments.

Appeal from trial term.

Action by Julius H. Lowenstein and others against Mac Schiff on a promissory note. From an order directing a bill of particulars, plaintiffs appeal. Affirmed.

Argued before NEWBURGER, McCARTHY, and CONLAN, JJ.

Metzgar & Tabor, for appellants.

Blumenstiel & Hirsch, for respondent.

NEWBURGER, J.

This action is brought to recover on three promissory notes made by defendant to the order of plaintiffs. The defendant’s answer admits the making of the notes, but sets up as a distinct defense the execution by plaintiffs, with other creditors of this defendant, of a composition deed. The plaintiffs, in their reply, admit the execution of the composition agreement, but allege that they were induced to sign the same by reason of the statements made by defendant that his creditors agreed to accept the sum of 35 cents on the dollar in full for their claims, except those who had claims for less than $100 in amount, and that no creditor was to receive more than 35 cents on the dollar; that the defendant entered into a secret agreement with other, creditors whose claims were larger in amount than $100 to pay their claims in full, or in greater sum than 35 per cent., and .that the defendant did pay certain of his creditors more than 35 cents on the dollar. The appeal is taken from an order entered herein requiring the plaintiffs to serve a bill of particulars setting forth the names of each creditor, and the dates and amounts of each of such payments. The order was properly made. The granting or denying a motion for a bill of particulars must be determined by the facts and circumstances in each case, and the considerations which should govern the court in granting or refusing it are for the purpose of furnishing an adverse party with information which is exclusively in the possession of the other, and which it is proper that such adverse party should have, that he may be prepared for trial and prevent surprise. Upon the facts herein, the. order appealed from must be affirmed, with costs. All concur.
GreenPower Motor Company Inc.: Exhibit 10.30 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com


    

    CERTIFICATIONS 

    I, Fraser Atkinson, certify that: 

    1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of GreenPower Motor Company Inc.; 

    2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

    3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

    4.The company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

    (a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

    (b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial reporting.

     

    Date: 29 June 2021

        /s/ Fraser Atkinson   

    Fraser Atkinson

    Chief Executive Officer
# C_2021091EN.01003101.xml

| 18.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 91/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 91/31

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9554 — Elanco Animal Health/Bayer Animal Health Division)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 91/04)

On 8 June 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9554. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9554. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
EXHIBIT 4


Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 1350 of
 Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350)
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of Canadian Natural Resources Limited (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steve W. Laut, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 DATED this 27th day of March, 2013.
 
 SIGNED “STEVE W. LAUT”
 Steve W. Laut
 President (Principal Executive Officer),
 Canadian Natural Resources Limited
EXHIBIT
32.1







PERICOM
SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with this quarterly report of Pericom Semiconductor Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 28, 2009 (the
“Report”), I, Alex C. Hui, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
knowledge:




(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and




(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
and for the periods indicated.





May 6,
2009




By:
              /s/ Alex C. HuiAlex
      C. HuiChief
      Executive OfficerPericom
      Semiconductor Corporation
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

December 26, 2012

t1217

Order 

December 26, 2012

145787

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145787

COA: 310558

Oakland CC: 2011-235491-FC

RAYMONE DARQUINE ROGERS,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 11, 2012 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          11,298
<SECURITIES>                                    14,987
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,625
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,283
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,763
<PP&E>                                          32,236
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,430
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  68,940
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,639
<BONDS>                                             50
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            4,866
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        88,326
<OTHER-SE>                                    (54,770)<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    68,940
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                75,066
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   63,003
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   629<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   554
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  72
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,620
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (5,314)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,306
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,306
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .30<F3>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .28
<FN>
<F1> Accumulated deficit
<F2> Other income, net of expenses
<F3> Includes dividends and accretion on mandatorily redeemable preferred stock
</FN>


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 21
                                                                                
                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant
                                        
<TABLE> 
<S>                                                     <C> 
American List Corporation                               Delaware
American Student List Company, Inc.                     New York
Arnold Communications, Inc.                             Massachusetts
BDDH Group                                              United Kingdom
Blau Marketing Technologies, Inc.                       Delaware
Bounty Group Holdings Limited                           United Kingdom
Bounty Holdings Limited                                 United Kingdom
Brann Holdings Limited                                  United Kingdom
Brann Limited                                           United Kingdom
Clinical Communications, Inc.                           Delaware
Echo Marketing, Inc.                                    Georgia
GEM Communications Inc.                                 Connecticut
Halliday Jones Sales Limited                            United Kingdom
Health Products Research, Inc.                          New Jersey
MKM Marketinginstitut GmbH                              Germany
National Sales Services, Inc.                           Delaware
Rapid Deployment Group Limited                          United Kingdom
Rapid Deployment Limited                                United Kingdom
Response Marketing Group, LLC                           Georgia
Sampling Corporation of America                         Illinois
Snyder Complete Target Marketing Solutions              Nevada
Snyder Direct Services, Inc.                            Delaware
Snyder Healthcare Sales, Inc.                           New Jersey
Snyder Marketing Services, Inc.                         Delaware
Snyder Medical Services France                          France

</TABLE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JOSE LUIS REYNA,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2024-1091

[August 22, 2024]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Caroline C. Shepherd, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 502000CF013843AXXX.

Jose L. Reyna, Wewahitchka, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., KUNTZ and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.