alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Southern Copper Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, J. Eduardo Gonzalez Felix, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)               The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)               The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|                   | /s/ J. EDUARDO GONZALEZ FELIX                       |
|-------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|              | J. Eduardo  Gonzalez Felix                          |
|              | Vice President,  Finance and ChiefFinancial Officer |
| Date: May 9, 2007 |                                                |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been provided to Southern Copper Corporation and will be retained by Southern Copper Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
#### Jose Fremonde XENOS, Appellant v. Nuria SLOJUND.

No. 10-4406.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted for Possible Summary Action Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6 Feb. 28, 2011.

April 18, 2011.

Jose Fremonde Xenos, Allentown, PA, pro se.

Before: McKEE, Chief Judge, ALDISERT and WEIS, Circuit Judges.

*81OPINION

PER CURIAM.

*Pro se*appellant, Jose Fremonde Xenos, filed the underlying action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Nuria Slojund, Esq., his court-appointed appellate attorney. Xenos complained about Slojund’s actions during the course of his appeal from a state criminal proceeding which apparently ended adversely to him. The District Court dismissed Xenos’ complaint *sua sponte*for lack of legal merit in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). For the reasons provided by the District Court, we agree and will affirm.

As the District Court explained, a defense attorney “does not act under color of state law when performing a lawyer’s traditional functions as counsel in a criminal proceeding.” *Polk County v. Dodson,*454 U.S. 312, 325, 102 S.Ct. 445, 70 L.Ed.2d 509 (1981). Because the complaint contains no allegations to suggest that Slojund is a state actor properly sued under § 1983, we conclude that the District Court did not err in dismissing Xenos’ complaint.1 Accordingly, we will summarily affirm the judgment of the District Court as no substantial question is presented by this appeal. *See*Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6.

1

. Any attack on the criminal proceeding itself or the sentence ultimately imposed falls within the purview of 28 U.S.C. § 2254, not an action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
Skip to main content

Privacy Policy•Site map

# Updated Scheduled Matters

Beginning Tuesday, February 20, 2024, the court's daily schedule will be available through an automated link.

Howard T. Markey National Courts Building • 717 Madison Place, NW, Washington, DC 20439 • 202-357-6400
# C_2022361EN.01004001.xml

| 20.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 361/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 361/40

---

P9_TA(2022)0094

Automated data exchange with regard to vehicle registration data in Italy *

European Parliament legislative resolution of 24 March 2022 on the draft Council implementing decision on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to vehicle registration data in Italy (14838/2021 — C9-0004/2022 — 2021/0808(CNS))

(Consultation)

(2022/C 361/14)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the Council draft (14838/2021), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Council draft (14838/2021),

| — | having regard to Article 39(1) of the Treaty on European Union, as amended by the Treaty of Amsterdam, and Article 9 of Protocol No 36 on transitional provisions, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C9-0004/2022), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 39(1) of the Treaty on European Union, as amended by the Treaty of Amsterdam, and Article 9 of Protocol No 36 on transitional provisions, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C9-0004/2022),

| — | having regard to Council Decision 2008/615/JHA of 23 June 2008 on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime (1), and in particular Article 33 thereof, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Council Decision 2008/615/JHA of 23 June 2008 on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime (1), and in particular Article 33 thereof,

| — | having regard to Rule 82 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 82 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A9-0047/2022), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A9-0047/2022),

| 1. | Approves the Council draft; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

2.

| 3. | Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

3.

| 4. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

4.

---

(1)  OJ L 210, 6.8.2008, p. 1.

---
# C_2021472EN.01001201.xml

| 23.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 472/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 472/12

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10489 – BAXTER/HILL-ROM)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 472/10)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Baxter International Inc. (‘Baxter’, US); |
| --- | --- |

—

Baxter International Inc. (‘Baxter’, US);

| — | Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. (‘Hill-Rom’, US). |
| --- | --- |

—

Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. (‘Hill-Rom’, US).

Baxter acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Hill-Rom.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | Baxter is a global heathcare company, primarily active in the development, manufacturing and marketing of products for treatment of chronic and acute medical conditions in hospitals, care centres and at home. |
| --- | --- |

—

Baxter is a global heathcare company, primarily active in the development, manufacturing and marketing of products for treatment of chronic and acute medical conditions in hospitals, care centres and at home.

| — | Hill-Rom is a global medical equipment company that develops and markets products such as hospital beds and furniture, care products such as monitors, respiratory equipment and blood pressure instruments, as well as surgical products. |
| --- | --- |

—

Hill-Rom is a global medical equipment company that develops and markets products such as hospital beds and furniture, care products such as monitors, respiratory equipment and blood pressure instruments, as well as surgical products.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10489 – Baxter / Hill-Rom

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

| Postal address: |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Postal address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 

Complainant 

vs. 

RANDAL D. MERRILL, 

Respondent. 

Docket Number CG S&R 00-0079 

CG Case No. 00000167 

DECISION AND ORDER ON REMAND 

Issued by: Archie R. Boggs, Administrative Law Judge 

A Coast Guard Investigating Officer at New Orleans, LA, filed an Original Complaint 

against Mr. Merrill on 26 January 2000 which alleged "Use of or Addiction to the Use of 

Dangerous Drugs" in that Mr. Merrill took a post accident test and his specimen subsequently 

tested positive for cocaine metabolite. After a hearing the undersigned dismissed the 

. Complaint and issued a Decision and Order to that effect. 

The Investigating Officer appealed the Decision to the Commandant of the United 

States Coast Guard on 1 May 2001. As a result of that appeal t he Commandant on 3 

September 2002 remanded the Decision and Order to the undersigned with instructions to 

make a determination as to whether Mr. Merrill voluntarily submitted to the relevant drug test. 

On remand Mr. Merrill was represented by Troy G. Ingram, attorney at law, 2065 First 

J» I o, 
2 

Street, Suite 102, Slidell, LA, 70458. Mr. Ingram requested that the matter be reopened and he 

be afforded an opportunity to supplement the record. 

In his remand decision the Commandant stated: 

"The record clearly indicates that the ALJ did not make a determination as to 

whether Mr. Merrill's drug test was voluntary. Pursuant to 33 CPR 20.1004, 

when deciding a case on appeal, I may ' ... affirm, modify, or reverse the 

ALJ's decision or ... (may) ... remand the case for further proceedings." Given 

my authority and the fact that the ALJ did not make a determination as to the 

voluntariness of Mr. Merrill's urinalysis, I am remanding this case. The ALJ 

should determine whether Mr. Merrill voluntarily submitted t o the relevant 

drug test and, if the ALJ finds in the affirmative, whether that determination 

would be sufficient to alt er the outcome of this case. While the ALJ may 

hold further proceedings to assist in this determination, if he finds that the 

issue has sufficiently been developed in the record, he may determine whether 

Mr. Merrill voluntarily submit ted to the relevant drug test absent further 

proceedings." (Underscore mine) 

"The ultimate purpose of the drug testing regulations is to insure that people 

holding merchant mariner's licenses and merchant mariner's documents do 

not use dangerous drugs." 

The record clearly shows that Mr. Merrill had no objection to taking the drug test and 

his submission of a urine specimen was entirely voluntary on his part. 

ORDER 

License No. 796883 and merchant mariner's document No. 224 72 4904 issued to 
3 

Randall D. Merrill are REVOKED. 

~!~~ Administrative Law Judge 

Dated J3 January 2003
Exhibit 32.1



PERICOM SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED



PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this quarterly report of Pericom Semiconductor Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 27, 2003 (the
Report), I, Alex C. Hui, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.



November 11, 2003



By:

/s/ Alex C. HuiAlex C. HuiChief Executive OfficerPericom Semiconductor Corporation
Exhibit 99.2





PERICOM SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with this quarterly report of Pericom Semiconductor Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 (the Report), I, Michael D. Craighead, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.





Date:    November 12, 2002



By:

/s/    MICHAEL D.
CRAIGHEADMichael D. Craighead Chief Financial
Officer
#### Thaddeus S. Piduch, Respondent, v Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, Appellant.

Since the first amended complaint contains no allegation that defendant engaged in any conduct or transactions affecting the general public, the causes of action predicated upon a violation of Insurance Law § 40-d and the request for punitive damages and attorney’s fees should have been dismissed *(see, Hubbell v Trans World Ins. Co.,*50 NY2d 899, 901; *Halpin v Prudential Ins. Co.,*48 NY2d 906, 907-908; *Uniland Dev. Co. v Home Ins. Co., 97*AD2d 973).

The court also abused its discretion by allowing plaintiff to replead his claim for punitive damages and attorney’s fees. The proposed amendment merely speculates that defendant engaged in a general business practice, and plaintiff has failed to demonstrate by affidavit or otherwise that defendant engaged in any activities harmful to the general public. The court should have denied leave to replead the claim for punitive damages and attorney’s fees without prejudice to renewal upon proper papers (CPLR 3211 [e]; *Young v Nelson,*23 AD2d 531).

Accordingly, the order is modified by dismissing the second, fifth and sixth causes of action of the amended complaint and by denying, without prejudice, the cross motion to the extent it seeks leave to replead a claim for punitive damages and attorney’s fees. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Kubiniec, J. — motion to dismiss.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Boomer, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-25-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-25-1999
<CASH>                                           4,961
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,881,108
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (316,987)
<INVENTORY>                                  2,108,755
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,045,364
<PP&E>                                       6,376,236
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,320,954)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,260,265
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,535,451
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,792,857
<COMMON>                                       104,050
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,260,265
<SALES>                                      9,610,801
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,610,801
<CGS>                                        8,977,396
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,977,396
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,989,765
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             713,885
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,070,245)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              2,835,565
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,234,680)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.86)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.86)


</TABLE>
1

The Honorable Charles A. Shaw, United States District Judge

for the Eastern District of Missouri.

___________

No. 96-1048

___________

United States of America, *

 *

Appellee, *

 *

v. * Appeal from the United States

 * District Court for the

Rene Gamboa-Jimenez, also known * Eastern District of Missouri.

as Henry Valles-Rodriguez, * [UNPUBLISHED]

 *

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: August 7, 1996

 Filed: August 16, 1996 ___________

Before FAGG, WOLLMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM.

Rene Gamboa-Jimenez (Gamboa) challenges the 16-month sentence

imposed by the district court1 upon his guilty plea to unlawfully

entering the United States after having been deported, in violation

of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We affirm.

At sentencing, Gamboa requested that the district court depart

downward under U.S.S.G. § 5K2.11, p.s. (Lesser Harms). He asserted

he had reentered the country for treatment of a serious injury,

perceiving that his inability to obtain adequate medical treatment

in his native country was a greater harm than that engendered by

unlawfully reentering this country. The district court rejected

his request, instead offering to recommend to the Bureau of Prisons

that Gamboa be placed in a medical facility. Responding to a

suggestion in the presentence report, the court noted several
-2-

arrest warrants were pending against Gamboa, but declined to depart

upward under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3 (Adequacy of Criminal History

Category).

Gamboa now argues that, because the district court believed it

could depart upward under section 4A1.3, the court apparently

believed it was precluded from departing downward under section

5K2.11. We may review the district court's refusal to depart only

if it "is premised on the belief that the court lacked the

authority to [depart]." United States v. Jenkins, 78 F.3d 1283,

1290 (8th Cir. 1996). Having carefully reviewed the sentencing

transcript, we conclude the court was aware of its authority to

depart under section 5K2.11 and exercised its discretion not to do

so, and thus we may not further review the district court's

decision.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2610 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2610

 To require the Secretary of the Treasury to redesign Federal reserve 
  notes so as to include a likeness of Harriet Tubman, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 2, 2015

 Mr. Katko (for himself, Mr. Cummings, Mr. Gibson, Mr. Hurd of Texas, 
 Miss Rice of New York, Mr. Buck, Ms. Graham, Mrs. Brooks of Indiana, 
 and Ms. McSally) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Secretary of the Treasury to redesign Federal reserve 
  notes so as to include a likeness of Harriet Tubman, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Harriet Tubman Tribute Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. LIKENESS OF HARRIET TUBMAN REQUIRED TO BE INCLUDED ON THE FACE 
              OF FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES.

    The 8th undesignated paragraph of section 16 of the Federal Reserve 
Act (12 U.S.C. 418) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
sentence: ``The Secretary of the Treasury shall designate one of the 
foregoing denominations and shall ensure that the face of all Federal 
reserve notes of that denomination printed after December 31, 2017, 
shall bear the likeness of Harriet Tubman.''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2021258EN.01001901.xml

| 2.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 258/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 258/19

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10262 — Facebook/Kustomer)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 258/09)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Facebook, Inc. (‘Facebook’, USA), |
| --- | --- |

—

Facebook, Inc. (‘Facebook’, USA),

| — | Kustomer, Inc. (‘Kustomer’, USA). |
| --- | --- |

—

Kustomer, Inc. (‘Kustomer’, USA).

Facebook acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Kustomer.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

The concentration has been referred to the Commission by the Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde, the Austrian Competition Authority, pursuant to Article 22(3) of the Merger Regulation. The referral was subsequently joined by Belgium, Bulgaria, France, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal and Romania.

2.

| — | for Facebook: providing websites and applications for mobile devices offering social networking, consumer communications and photo and video-sharing functionalities, including three messaging channels: Messenger, WhatsApp and Instagram Messaging, |
| --- | --- |

—

for Facebook: providing websites and applications for mobile devices offering social networking, consumer communications and photo and video-sharing functionalities, including three messaging channels: Messenger, WhatsApp and Instagram Messaging,

| — | for Kustomer: offering a customer relationship management (CRM) software as a service specialising in assisting business’ customer service agents to manage communications with consumers. |
| --- | --- |

—

for Kustomer: offering a customer relationship management (CRM) software as a service specialising in assisting business’ customer service agents to manage communications with consumers.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10262 – Facebook/Kustomer

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---