alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021413EN.01000901.xml

| 12.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 413/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 413/9

---

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/1720, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/1800, and in Council Regulation (EU) 2019/1716, concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Nicaragua

(2021/C 413/07)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in the Annex to Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/1720 (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/1800 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) 2019/1716 (3), concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Nicaragua.

The Council of the European Union, after having reviewed the list of designated persons, has decided that the persons that appear in the above-mentioned Annexes should continue to be included in the list of persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Decision (CFSP) 2019/1720 and Regulation (EU) 2019/1716.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) 2019/1716 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Nicaragua, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments.

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned lists should be reconsidered, before 1 June 2022, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1.C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1.C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council’s periodic review, in accordance with Article 9 of Decision (CFSP) 2019/1720 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Nicaragua.

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 262, 15.10.2019, p. 58.

(2)  OJ L 361, 12.10.2021, p. 52.

(3)  OJ L 262, 15.10.2019, p. 1.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-37,333]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation was initiated on February 14, 2000, in response to a worker petition which was filed by IUE Local 154-136B FW, on behalf of workers at S. Bent & Bros., Inc., Gardner, Massachusetts.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

Signed in Washington, D.C. this 4th day of April, 2000.

Grant D. Beale,

Program Manager, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 00-9523  Filed 4-14-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of meetings of the Board of Scientific Counselors, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.

The meetings will be closed to the public as indicated below in accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of individual intramural programs and projects conducted by the NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE, including consideration of personnel qualifications and performance, and the competence of individual investigators, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Board of Scientific Counselors, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.                              ( print page 52916)    

*Date:*                         October 24-26, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         12:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate personnel qualifications and performance, and competence of individual investigators.                    

*Place:*                         Porter Neuroscience Research Center, Building 35A, 35 Convent Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Nina F. Schor, MD, Ph.D., Deputy Director, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Building 31, Room 8A52, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-9746,                         *nina.schor@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 17, 2021.

Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-20580 Filed 9-22-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
**Exhibit 3.1**

 

**CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT**

**OF**

**AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OFINCORPORATION**

**OF**

**SOUTHERN COPPER CORPORATION**

 

Southern CopperCorporation (the “Corporation”), a corporation organized and existing under andby virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, DOES HERBYCERTIFY:

 

1.                           The name of the corporation is SouthernCopper Corporation.

 

2.                           The Amended and Restated Certificate ofIncorporation (as amended and in effect, the “Charter”) of the Corporation ishereby amended by replacing in its entirety Article Four of the Charterand by substituting in lieu of said Article Four the following:

 

“The total numberof shares of stock which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is2,000,000,000 shares of common stock, par value one cent ($0.01) per share(hereinafter referred to as the “Common Stock”). Each holder of Common Stockshall have one vote in respect of each share of Common Stock held by suchholder of record on the books of the Corporation for the election of directorsand on all other matters on which holders of shares of Common Stock areentitled to vote. The holders of shares of Common Stock shall be entitled toreceive, when and if declared by the Board of Directors, out of the assets ofthe Corporation which are by law available therefor, dividends payable eitherin cash, in stock or otherwise.”

 

3.                           At the annual meeting of stockholders ofthe Corporation held on May 28, 2008, pursuant to resolution of the Boardof Directors, the above specified amendment to the Charter was duly adopted inaccordance with the applicable provisions of the General Corporation Law of theState of Delaware.

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the following duly authorized officer of Southern CopperCorporation has hereunto executed this Certificate of Amendment of the Amendedand Restated Certificate of Incorporation on May 28, 2008.

 

 
|   | SOUTHERN COPPER  CORPORATION |
|--------|------------------------------|
|   |                         |
|   |                         |
|   | By:                          | /s/Armando Ortega |
|   | Name:                        |  Armando Ortega |
|   |                         | Title:       Secretary |
|        |                              |  |  |

 

1

----
|   | 1. | The      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));      and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |    /s/  Raymond      R. Brandstrom |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Raymond      R. Brandstrom                                  |
|   | Chief      Financial Officer                                |
|   | May      11, 2009                                           |
#### Donna M. Hughes, Respondent, v Paul F. Farrey, Appellant.

Submitted December 4, 2006;

decided January 16, 2007

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
#### Sonia Rosario et al., Respondents, et al., Plaintiffs, v Diagonal Realty, LLC, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Submitted March 26, 2007;

decided March 29, 2007

Motion by Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General of the State of New York, for leave to appear amicus curiae on behalf of New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal and for an order pursuant to Executive Law § 71 permitting movant to file a brief and to participate in oral argument of the appeal, granted in each respect with the direction that three copies of the brief must be served and an original and 24 copies filed no later than April 30, 2007.
#### PEOPLE ex rel. BARRETT v. ROOSEVELT et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 6, 1896.)

Certiorari by Edward J. Barrett to review the proceedings of Theodore Roosevelt and others, constituting the board of police commissioners, dismissing relator from the police force.

Louis J. Grant, for relator.

Theodore Connoly, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The only question is as to

whether or not the evidence is sufficient to ■ justify the finding of the commissioners that the relator, on the night of the 31st day of October, 1895, left his post, and went into a saloon. That fact is sworn to positively by Mr. Cooper, the complainant. It is denied by. the officer, and thus there is a sharp conflict of evidence. The relator called several witnesses to corroborate his story. Cooper, the complainant, swears that he saw the relator go into the saloon between 5 minutes of 10 and 15 minutes after 10. McLaughlin swears that he saw the relator between Eighth and Ninth avenues between half past 9 and 15 minutes after 10; that about 15 minutes before 10 he saw him go towards Tenth avenue, but did not see him again. This is not at all inconsistent with the complainant’s testimony. The relator also called two men who were in this saloon on the night in question, both of whom swore that they did not see the police officer in the saloon. A significant fact, however, appears in relation to the testimony of one of these persons, Peter E. Boer, who swore that on that night, some time after 11 o’clock, the relator came to the saloon and sent for this witness. The relator told the witness that he (the relator) had ■ been accused by a certain person of running away, and he asked the witness how long he (the witness) had been in there. The witness said that he had been in all the evening. “He [the relator] said he would have a complaint probably. He asked me to come down and testify in his behalf.’’ It nowhere appears that Cooper told the officer what his complaint against him was. It only appears that Cooper had told the officer that he had run away from him, and had concealed his number, and refused to give his name; and yet, immediately after such charge was made, the relator goes to this saloon to engage the witness to go and testify in his behalf. It is a little difficult to see how the officer could have known that Cooper was to charge him with being in the saloon, in the absence of any statement by Cooper to him, unless he had been there. On the whole case we think a question was presented for the commissioners to determine, and that we would not be justified in reversing such determination. The proceedings of the commissioners are therefore affirmed, and the writ dismissed.
Listen

# Commission News

U.S. Commission on Civil Rights Releases Translated 2023 Statutory Enforcement Report, The Federal Response to Anti-Asian Racism in the United States
February 9, 2024

USCCR to Hold Public Briefing on Civil Rights Implications of the Federal Use of Facial Recognition Technology
February 1, 2024

U.S. Commission on Civil Rights Updates Agency Language Access Plan
November 15, 2023

U.S. Commission on Civil Rights Releases Performance and Accountability Report for Fiscal Year 2023
November 15, 2023

USCCR to Hold Public Briefing on Racial Disparities in Violent Crime Victimization in the United States
October 26, 2023

U.S. Commission on Civil Rights Releases Report: The Federal Response to Anti-Asian Racism in the United States
September 26, 2023

U. S. Commission on Civil Rights to Release Report:  The Federal Response to Anti-Asian Racism in the United States
August 30, 2023

U.S. Commission on Civil Rights Announces Commissioner Rochelle M. Garza as Chairperson and Commissioner Victoria F. Nourse as Vice-Chairperson
July 21, 2023

U.S. Commission on Civil Rights FY 2024 Lapse Plan
July 20, 2023

Appointment of Commissioner Rochelle Mercedes Garza by President Joe Biden
March 17, 2023

-  1 
-  2 
-  3 
-   ...  
-   Next  
-   Last  

-  All News 
-  Commission News 
-  Advisory Committees News 
-  Correspondence 
-  Videos 
-  Archives 

## Meetings

### Recent and Upcoming

Civil Rights Implications of the Federal Use of Facial Recognition Technology
March 8, 2024

Commission Business Meeting
February 23, 2024

Commission Business Meeting
January 19, 2024

VIEW ALL
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Secure Computing Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Timothy J. Steinkopf, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Timothy J. Steinkopf                                       
|Timothy J. Steinkopf                                           
|Senior Vice President of Operations and Chief Financial Officer
|August 7, 2006                                                 



29
CLEAR CREEK ABOVE CLEAR CREEK RESERVOIRLatitude: 39.018Longitude: -106.277Elevation: 8885

Clear Creek Above Clear Creek Reservoir

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Brumley Site Page...



Brumley

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Independence Pass Site Page...



Independence Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Park Cone Site Page...



Park Cone
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

** **

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Blount International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Calvin E. Jenness,Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(i)            The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periodsexpressed in the report.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to BlountInternational, Inc. and will be retained by Blount International, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

 

Date: August 8, 2008

 

 
| /s/ Calvin E. Jenness      |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
| Calvin E. Jenness          |   |
| Senior Vice President  and |   |
| Chief Financial Officer    |   |

 

----
#### PAGNOD v. McGRATH.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July, 1896.)

Action by Arthur Pag'nod against Eugene J. McGrath.

No opinion. Motion granted, with $10 costs.
Exhibit 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-3 (Nos. 333-148060, 333-107137, 333-122114, 333-117717, 333-125565,  333-140110, 333-152591, 333-132611, 333-111894, 333-1055509, 333-96813, 333-46967, and 333-91957) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-152284, 333-138598, and 333-93435) of our report dated March 10, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Apricus Biosciences, Inc. and Subsidiaries, which appear in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Apricus Biosciences, Inc. and Subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2010.   We also have audited the adjustments described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements that were applied to restate the 2009 and 2008 consolidated financial statements for the 15 to 1 reverse stock split.
In our opinion, such adjustments are appropriate and have been properly applied. We were not engaged to audit, review, or apply any procedures to the 2009 and 2008 consolidated financial statements of the Company other than with respect to the adjustments and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on the 2009 and 2008 consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.





/s/ EisnerAmper LLP





March 10, 2011


Edison, New Jersey
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         188,966
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  398,671
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    194,010
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,862,760
<PP&E>                                       5,781,894
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,210,596)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,854,180
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,489,030
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    406,017
<COMMON>                                        33,633
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,010,883
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,854,180
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,997,153
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,531,360
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,223,208
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             291,076
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,029,684)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,029,684)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,029,684)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.32)


</TABLE>
NUMBER 13-13-00287-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

PAULO TREVINO A/K/A PAUL TREVINO 

A/K/A PANCHO TREVINO, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 148th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Paulo Trevino a/k/a Paul Trevino a/k/a Pancho Trevino, by and through 

his attorney, has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal because he no longer desires to 

prosecute it. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we 

grant the motion to dismiss pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and 
2

dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for 

rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 

Delivered and filed the

8th day of August, 2013.