alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2024 FAPAC CIVILIAN 

AWARDS

NOMINATIONS ARE NOW OPEN!

The Federal Asian Pacific American 

Council (FAPAC) Civilian Awards 

recognize individuals who have 

made significant contributions 

to the advancement of AANHPI 

communities and promoted 

diversity and inclusion among the 

Federal and District of Columbia 

government workforces.

You can request a nomination form 

from the acting Civil Rights Awards 

Manager and follow instructions 

in ALCOAST 038/24. (Contact 

Information at bottom.)

All civilian members of the U.S. 

Coast Guard are eligible for 

consideration.

The performance period is 

Fiscal Year 2023 (October 1, 

2022 - September 30, 2023 or 

Calendar Year 2023 (January 1 - 

December 31, 2023).

Any Coast Guard member can 

nominate a deserving individual!

ABOUT THE AWARD HOW DO I SUBMIT A 

NOMINATION?

WHO CAN BE NOMINATED?

WHAT IS THE PERIOD OF 

PERFORMANCE?

WHO CAN NOMINATE?

DEADLINE IS FEBRUARY 19, 2024 5PM

To learn more about the FAPAC 

Civilian Awards, including award and 

nomination criteria, scan the QR code.

Point of Contact: Mr. Edward Stoker Edward.A.Stoker@uscg.mil
#### GILLIG v. GEORGE C. TREADWELL CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

October 2, 1896.)

Action by Henry F. Gillig against the George C. Tread-well Company.

No opinion. The order appealed from is modified by striking out, after the figures $3,685.49, the words, “with interest thereon from the 5th of January, 1895,” and inserting in lieu thereof the words, “with interest thereon from May 9, 1896”; and, as so amended, affirmed, with costs. All concur. See 32 N. Y. Supp. 974 ; 34 N. Y. Supp. 1139; 42 N. E. 590.
ECHO RESERVOIRLatitude: 40.964Longitude: -111.432Elevation: 5569

ECHO RESERVOIR

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Redden Mine Lwr Site Page...



Redden Mine Lwr

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Beaver Divide Site Page...



Beaver Divide

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Brighton Site Page...



Brighton

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Chalk Creek #1 Site Page...



Chalk Creek #1

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Chalk Creek #2 Site Page...



Chalk Creek #2

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Hayden Fork Site Page...



Hayden Fork

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Smith  Morehouse Site Page...



Smith  Morehouse

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Thaynes Canyon Site Page...



Thaynes Canyon

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Trial Lake Site Page...



Trial Lake
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7370
In Re: JOHN PATRICK MCSHEFFREY, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-03-663) Submitted: November 19, 2003 Decided: December 5, 2003 Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Patrick McSheffrey, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: John Patrick McSheffrey petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has refused to file his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to file his petition. The district court’s docket reflects that the district court filed and dismissed the petition by order entered on August 29, 2003. While we grant McSheffrey’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny his mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit
      32.1








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of AMT Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation,
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2006, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ms.
      Pak King Diu, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
      the
      following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
            The
                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





/s/
                Pak King DiuMs.
                Pak King DiuPresident
                and Chief Financial OfficerFebruary
                6, 2008
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302**

**OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Jim McDevitt, certify that: 

1. I havereviewed this report on Form 10-KSB of Capital Growth Systems, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small businessissuer and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the smallbusiness issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Dated: April 14, 2008
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Communications System

# AGENCY:

National Communications System (NCS).

# ACTION:

Notice of Meeting. 

A meeting of the Telecommunications Service Priority (TSP) System Oversight Committee will convene Tuesday, April 25, 2000 from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. The meeting will be held at 701 South Court House Road, Arlington, VA in the NCC conference room on the 2nd floor.

—Opening/Administration Remarks

—Status of the TSP Program

—CLEC/Broadband Discussion

Anyone interested in attending or presenting additional information to the Committee, please contact Mr. Richard Moran, Manager, Office of Priority Telecommunications, (703) 607-4930.

Frank McClelland,

Federal Register Liaison Officer, National Communications System.

[FR Doc. 00-9511  Filed 4-14-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-08-M
**EXHIBIT 32**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, in his capacity as an officer of AstrotechCorporation (“Astrotech”), that, to the best of his knowledge, the QuarterlyReport of Astrotech on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009,fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Qfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operation of Astrotech.

 

 
| Date: May 14, 2009 |                                               |
|-------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                    |                                               |
|                    |                                               |
| ** **              | /s/ Thomas B.  Pickens, III                   |
|                    | Thomas B.  Pickens, III                       |
|                    | Chief Executive Officer                            |
|                    |                                               |
|                    |                                               |
|                    | /s/ Brian K. Harrington                            |
|                    | Brian K. Harrington                                |
|                    | Senior Vice President  and Chief Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Astrotech and will be retained byAstrotech and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

 

----
#### Peter Gonzales v. the State. Joseph Johnson v. the State.

In an indictment for using estrays it is necessary to aver that it was done “without complying with the laws regulating estrays.” (Paschal’s Dig., Art. 2441, Note 693.)

Errors from Parker. These cases were tried before Hon. John J. Good, one of the district judges.

There were two cases against Gonzales and sureties, and one against Johnson and sureties. The indictments charged the defendants respectively with taldng up, using, and selling estrays, but did not aver that it was done “ without complying with the laws regulating estrays.” The defendants were arrested and gave bonds, which were forfeited, and on return of *scire facias*they failed to answer, and final judgments were rendered. The defendants prosecuted error, and assigned for error that the parties indicted were not charged with any offense known to the law. The bonds really had the same complaint, for they recited no offense.

*A. J. Hood*and *S. P.*Donley, for plaintiffs in error.

*H. B. Turner, Attorney General,*for the state.

Lindsay, J.

—The appellant in each of these cases was indicted for using estrays without complying with the laws regulating estrays. The recognizance of each, with his *206sureties, was taken to secure Ms personal appearance in court to answer the charge. In each of the recognizances the offense named was simply using a stray horse. By a decision of this court, in the case of Hutchinson v. the State, 26 Tex., 111, it has been adjudicated that, in accusations for using estrays, the expression, “without complying with the laws regulating estrays,” is a “ necessary ingredient” to constitute the offense; from which we'must infer, if this phrase or its equivalent is not used, no offense is named. As article 2731, Paschal’s Digest, is imperative that the offense should he named in the recognizances, and as there has been a failure to do so in each of these recognizances, the judgment must he reversed in each case.

Judgments reversed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1


                               ILEX ONCOLOGY, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE
                     (In Thousands, Except Per Share Amount)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  Three Months Ended               Six Months Ended
                                                                       June 30,                        June 30,
                                                              --------------------------      --------------------------
                                                                 1998            1999            1998            1999
                                                              ----------      ----------      ----------      ----------
<S>                                                           <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>
       COMPUTATION OF BASIC LOSS PER SHARE
Net Loss                                                      $   (4,458)     $  (22,609)     $  (11,404)     $  (27,089)
      Weighted average number of shares of Common
            Stock outstanding                                     12,306          12,955          12,293          12,829
Basic net loss per share                                      $     (.36)     $    (1.74)     $     (.93)     $    (2.11)
                                                              ==========      ==========      ==========      ==========

      COMPUTATION OF DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE
Net Loss                                                      $   (4,458)     $  (22,609)     $  (11,404)     $  (27,089)
Weighted average number of shares of Common Stock and
   Common Stock equivalents outstanding:
      Weighted average number of shares of Common
            Stock outstanding
                                                                  12,306          12,955          12,293          12,829
      Weighted average number of Common Stock equivalents
            applicable to stock options and warrants (1)             411             323             361             431
                                                              ----------      ----------      ----------      ----------
Common Stock and Common Stock equivalents                         12,717          13,278          12,654          13,260
                                                              ==========      ==========      ==========      ==========
Diluted net loss per share                                    $     (.35)     $    (1.70)     $     (.90)     $    (2.04)
                                                              ==========      ==========      ==========      ==========
</TABLE>


(1) This calculation is submitted in accordance with Item 601(b)11 of
    regulation S-K although it is not required by SFAS No. 128 because it is
    antidilutive.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Jarmar D. MOORE, Appellant.

No. 10-2488.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 28, 2010.

Filed: June 10, 2011.

*586Anita L. Burns, Asst. Fed. Public Defender, Kansas City, MO (Raymond C. Conrad, Jr., Fed. Public Defender, on the brief), for appellant.

Bruce E. Clark, Asst. U.S. Atty., Kansas City, MO (Beth Phillips, U.S. Atty., on the brief), for appellee.

Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Jarmar D. Moore pled guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 924(a)(2). In calculating the advisory Guidelines sentencing range, the district court1 added a 4-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(6) for possessing or using the firearm at issue “in connection with another felony offense.” On appeal, Moore’s counsel moved to withdraw, and in a brief filed under *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), argues that the district court erred in overruling Moore’s objection to the 4-level enhancement, and that Moore received ineffective assistance of counsel.

The district court did not err in applying the 4-level enhancement, because the court could have concluded, based on the facts before it, that Moore possessed the firearm in connection with another felony offense: violation of Mo.Rev.Stat. § 571.030, which prohibits the unlawful use of a weapon. *See United States v. Jenkins-Watts,*574 F.3d 950, 960 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review); *U.S.S. G. § 2K2.1, comment U(C).*Contrary to Moore’s argument, the contemporaneous brandishing of the firearm in violation of Mo. Rev. Stat § 571.030.1 supports the 4-level enhancement. *See United States v. Jackson,*633 F.3d 703, 708 (8th Cir.2011) Finally, the ineffective assistance claim is not properly raised in this direct appeal. *See United States v. Ramirez-Hernandez,*449 F.3d 824, 827 (8th Cir.2006).

*587This court reviewed the record independently under *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), and found no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. The judgment of the district court is affirmed, and counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted, subject to counsel informing Moore about procedures for seeking rehearing or filing a petition for certiorari.

1

. The Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 182 (Thursday, September 23, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 52915]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-20585]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Exploratory Data Science Methods 
and Algorithm Development, Early-Stage Development of Data Science 
Technologies, and Enhancement or Sustainment of Data Science Tools 
for Infectious and Immune-Mediated Diseases (R21, U01, U24).
    Date: October 26-28, 2021.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G42, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Sandip Bhattacharyya, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G42, 
Rockville, MD 20852, 240-292-0189, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#addeccc3c9c4dd83cfc5ccd9d9cccec5ccdfd4d4ccedc3c4c583cac2db"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f7849699939e87d9959f96838396949f96858e8e96b7999e9fd9909881">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 17, 2021.
Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-20585 Filed 9-22-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             777
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            6318
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       1899
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                          83714
<ALLOWANCE>                                        919
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  100557
<DEPOSITS>                                       67509
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               1291
<LONG-TERM>                                       6500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            17
<OTHER-SE>                                       25240
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  100557
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   6716
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  623
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  7339
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                3505
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                3938
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             3401
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      120
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   2627
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1293
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        1293
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       822
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.52
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.51
<LOANS-NON>                                        200
<LOANS-PAST>                                        45
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   252
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    675
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   800
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       16
<RECOVERIES>                                        15
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  919
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               759
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            160
        

</TABLE>