alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Skip to main content

Privacy Policy•Site map

# Matthew H. Solomson

Matthew H. Solomson was confirmed by the U.S. Senate in January 2020, and entered on duty at the court on February 4, 2020. The son of a retired U.S. Army colonel, Judge Solomson lived in eight states before starting high school in Maryland, where he currently resides with his family. He completed a B.A. in Economics, *cum laude*, from Brandeis University. In 2002, Judge Solomson graduated, with honors and Order of the Coif, from the University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law, and earned an M.B.A. (with a concentration in accounting) from the University of Maryland Robert H. Smith School of Business. Judge Solomson is the author of *Court of Federal Claims: Jurisdiction, Practice, and Procedure*, a legal treatise first published by Bloomberg BNA in 2016.

Prior to joining the court, Judge Solomson served as Chief Legal & Compliance Officer for an $11B federal contracting business unit of a Fortune 50 healthcare company. In that role, Judge Solomson managed a team of attorneys, compliance professionals, and internal auditors. He also previously led the government contracts practice group within the in-house law department of Booz Allen Hamilton, while serving as the principal government contracts counsel to the company's intelligence business unit. Judge Solomson's private practice experience includes having served as Counsel in the government contracts and litigation practice groups of Sidley Austin LLP, and as an Associate with Arnold & Porter LLP, both in Washington, DC.

In addition to his private sector experience, Judge Solomson was a Trial Attorney with the Commercial Litigation Branch of the U.S. Department of Justice, where he represented a variety of military and civilian agencies as counsel of record in dozens of cases before the National Courts, which include the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, the U.S. Court of International Trade, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Following law school, Judge Solomson served as a law clerk to Judge Francis M. Allegra of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims.  Since 2008, Judge Solomson has served as Adjunct Professor at the University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law, where he teaches government contracts law.  He is a member of the Maryland and DC bars, and previously was an officer of the Court of Federal Claims Bar Association.  Judge Solomson enjoys studying Talmud, playing tennis, and spending time at the beach with his family.

Howard T. Markey National Courts Building • 717 Madison Place, NW, Washington, DC 20439 • 202-357-6400
# C_2021519EN.01000201.xml

| 22.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 519/2 |
| ---------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | ------- |

---

Withdrawal of notification of a concentration (Case M.9637 – IAG / AIR EUROPA) (Text with EEA relevance) (2021/C 519/02) On 25 May 2021, the European Commission received notification ( 1 ) of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 ( 2 ) (‘Merger Regulation’). On 29 June 2021, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings ( 3 ) under Article 6(1)(c) of the Merger Regulation. On 16 December 2021, the notifying party informed the Commission that it withdrew its notification and demonstrated that it abandoned the concentration. ( 1 )  OJ C 209, 02.06.2021, p. 25. ( 2 )  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1. ( 3 )  OJ C 266, 06.07.2021, p. 2.

---
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

________________________

No. ACM S32432

________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Emad H. ABDULLAH

Senior Airman (E-4), U.S. Air Force, Appellant

________________________

Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary

Decided 25 July 2017

________________________

Military Judge: Brian D. Teter.

Approved sentence: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 7 months, 

forfeiture of $1,044.00 pay per month for 7 months, and reduction to 

E-1. Sentence adjudged 7 September 2016 by SpCM convened at Little 

Rock Air Force Base, Arkansas.

For Appellant: Major Virginia M. Bare, USAF.

For Appellee: Major Mary Ellen Payne, USAF.

Before MAYBERRY, JOHNSON, and SPERANZA, Appellate Military 

Judges.

________________________

This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as 

precedent under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 18.4.

________________________

PER CURIAM:

The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no 

error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles 59(a) and 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 

866(c). 
United States v. Abdullah, No. ACM S32432

2

Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT

KURT J. BRUBAKER

Clerk of the Court
#### In the Matter of Julia C. Parr, Appellant, v Richard Romeo et al., Constituting the Onondaga County Board of Elections, et al., Respondents.

(Appeal No. 1.)

Order unanimously affirmed without costs *(see, Matter of Goodman v Hayduk,*45 NY2d 804; *Matter of Callahan v Russo,*123 AD2d 518). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Gilbert, J.—Election Law.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Balio and Davis, JJ. (Order entered Aug. 21, 1987.)
# C_2022290EN.01015301.xml

| 29.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 290/153 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 290/153

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down transitional rules for the packaging and labelling of veterinary medicinal products authorised in accordance with Directive 2001/82/EC and Regulation (EC) No 726/2004

(COM(2022) 76 final — 2022/0053 (COD))

(2022/C 290/27)

| Referral | European Parliament, 7.3.2022
  Council, 11.3.2022 |
| --- | --- |
| Legal basis | Articles 114 and 168(4)(b) and article 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union |
| Section responsible | Agriculture, Rural Development and the Environment |
| Adopted at plenary | 23.3.2022 |
| Plenary session No | 568 |
| Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions) | 193/0/4 |

Referral

European Parliament, 7.3.2022

Council, 11.3.2022

Legal basis

Articles 114 and 168(4)(b) and article 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Section responsible

Agriculture, Rural Development and the Environment

Adopted at plenary

23.3.2022

Plenary session No

568

Outcome of vote

(for/against/abstentions)

193/0/4

Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 568th plenary session of 23 and 24 March 2022 (meeting of 23 March), by 193 votes in favour with 4 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 23 March 2022.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Christa SCHWENG

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          61,409
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,110,196
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (17,958)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,808,152
<PP&E>                                         561,089
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (98,097)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,022,584
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,991,923
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,009,000
<COMMON>                                     6,955,482
<OTHER-SE>                                  (6,284,741)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,022,584
<SALES>                                      4,156,193
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,156,193
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,750,523
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              36,979
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,550,225)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,551,825)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,551,825)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   Page 18 of 18

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(h)

Key Bank USA, National Association          Bankers Trust Company
127 Public Square                            as Indenture Trustee
Cleveland, Ohio  44114-1306                 4 Albany Street, 7th Floor
                                            New York, New York  10015

Bank One, National Association              MBIA Insurance Corporation
  as Eligible Lender Trustee                 as Surety Provider
One First National Plaza Suite 0126         113 King Street
Chicago, Illinois  60670                    Armonk, New York 10504

                         Independent Accountant's Report
                      For KeyCorp Student Loan Trust 2000-A

We have examined management's assertion, included in its representation letter
dated March 19, 2001 that Key Bank USA, National Association (KBUSA), a wholly
owned subsidiary of KeyCorp, complied with sections 4.04, 4.08(a), 4.08(b),
4.08(c), 5.05, 5.06, 5.07 and 5.08 of the KeyCorp Student Loan Trust 2000-A Sale
and Servicing Agreement and sections 1.(a)(xx), 1.(b)(iii), 2 and 3 of the
KeyCorp Student Loan Trust 2000-A Administration Agreement (collectively, the
"Agreements") as of December 31, 2000 and for the period from June 22, 2000
(date of inception) through December 31, 2000. As discussed in the
representation letter, management is responsible for KBUSA's compliance with
those requirements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's
assertion about KBUSA's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with attestation standards established by
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about KBUSA's compliance with
those requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances, except that in accordance with Section 5.05 of
the Sale and Servicing Agreement, our examination assumed the accuracy of
reports prepared by KBUSA's student loan processor. We believe that our
examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does
not provide a legal determination on KBUSA's compliance with the aforementioned
requirements.

In our opinion, assuming the accuracy of reports prepared by KBUSA's student
loan processor, management's assertion that KBUSA was in compliance with the
sections in the Agreements referred to above, as of December 31, 2000 and for
the period from January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2000, is fairly stated, in
all material respects.

This report is intended solely for your information and is not to be referred to
or distributed for any purpose to anyone who is not authorized to receive such
information as specified in the Agreements or in the exhibits attached thereto.

                                                /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Cleveland
March 19, 2001
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Arlene K. Marsh, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Tisch, J.), rendered August 26, 1986, convicting her of leaving the scene of an incident without reporting (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 600 [2]), upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of those branches of the defendant’s omnibus motion which were to suppress certain evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).

The hearing court’s determination denying those branches of the defendant’s motion which were to suppress is affirmed for reasons stated by Judge Tisch in his memorandum decision, dated May 19, 1986.

We perceive of no basis upon which to disturb the sentence imposed upon the defendant who admitted to having knowingly struck a child riding his bicycle while operating her automobile, leaving the scene of the incident only to return soon after, and, upon learning of his death, departing once again, undetected, and thereafter expending great efforts to conceal her acts from the law. The sentencing court’s determination in this case was neither inconsistent with sound sentencing principles nor inappropriate, notwithstanding the defendant’s otherwise unblemished record *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Mangano, J. P., Niehoff, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          17,407
<SECURITIES>                                    45,254
<RECEIVABLES>                                      194
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                63,959
<PP&E>                                           7,264
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,839
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  69,822
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,797
<BONDS>                                          1,565
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           136
<OTHER-SE>                                      64,324
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    69,822
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   164
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,291
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  22
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,337)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (13,337)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,337)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.99)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.99)
        

</TABLE>
Written Statement of the Senior Vice President and Treasurer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, the
undersigned Senior Vice President and Treasurer of Ridgestone Financial
Services, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge,
that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended
March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ William R. Hayes
--------------------------------------
William R. Hayes
Senior Vice President and Treasurer
May 13, 2003







A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350 has been
provided to Ridgestone Financial Services, Inc. and will be retained by
Ridgestone Financial Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 11

                    CAPITAL TITLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 For the
                                         Years Ended October 31,
                                         -----------------------
                                           1996           1995
                                           ----           ----
<S>                                      <C>          <C>
Earnings per share(1)

Common stock equivalents
     Options granted and
       exercised                         1,012,600              --
     Assumed buyback of
       options(2)                       (1,012,600)             --
                                        ----------       ---------

Total weighted average
  shares outstanding                     9,281,440       8,770,786
                                         ---------       ---------

Weighted average shares
  outstanding                            9,281,440       8,770,786
                                         =========       =========
</TABLE>
----------

(1)      Earnings per share are based upon the weighted average number of shares
         outstanding for each of the respective  periods.  All weighted  average
         shares  outstanding give  retroactive  effect to the one for ten (1-10)
         reverse stock split in May, 1996.

(2)      Buyback of stock  options  under the  treasury  stock  method is at the
         assumed  private  offering  price of $1 per share.  Under this  method,
         earnings per share data is computed as if the options and warrants were
         exercised at the  beginning of the period (or the time of issuance,  if
         later),  and as if the funds  obtained  thereby  were used to  purchase
         common stock at the private offering price during the period.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7173

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CARLOS GERARD WATKINS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Cameron McGowan Currie, District 

Judge. (0:05-cr-00090-CMC-1)

Submitted: January 10, 2011 Decided: January 28, 2011

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carlos Gerard Watkins, Appellant Pro Se. Leesa Washington, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Carlos Gerard Watkins appeals the district court’s 

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. In light of 

our recent decision in United States v. Stewart, 595 F.3d 197 (4th 

Cir. 2010), we vacate the district court’s order and remand for 

further proceedings consistent with Stewart. We deny Watkins’ 

motion for recalculation of his sentence under Fed. R. Crim. P. 35.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED
IIB 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2507 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 18, 2015 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

AN ACT 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to establish 

an annual rulemaking schedule for payment rates under 

Medicare Advantage. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2507 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Increasing Regulatory 

3 Fairness Act of 2015’’. 

4 SEC. 2. ESTABLISHING AN ANNUAL RULEMAKING SCHED5 ULE FOR PAYMENT RATES UNDER MEDICARE 

6 ADVANTAGE. 

7 Section 1853(b) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

8 1395w–23(b)) is amended— 

9 (1) in the subsection heading, by inserting ‘‘, 

10 ANNUAL RULEMAKING SCHEDULE FOR PAYMENT

11 RATES FOR 2017 AND SUBSEQUENT YEARS’’ after 

12 ‘‘RATES’’; 

13 (2) in paragraph (1)— 

14 (A) in subparagraph (B)— 

15 (i) in the subparagraph heading, by 

16 inserting ‘‘BEFORE 2017’’ after ‘‘YEARS’’; 

17 and 

18 (ii) in the matter preceding clause (i), 

19 by inserting ‘‘and before 2017’’ after 

20 ‘‘2005’’; and 

21 (B) by adding at the end the following new 

22 subparagraph: 

23 ‘‘(C) ANNUAL RULEMAKING SCHEDULE

24 FOR PAYMENT RATES FOR 2017 AND SUBSE25 QUENT YEARS.—For 2017 and each subsequent 

26 year, before April 1 of the preceding year, the 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 2507 RFS

1 Secretary shall, by regulation and in accordance 

2 with the notice and public comment periods re3 quired under paragraph (2) for such a year, an4 nually determine and announce the following: 

5 ‘‘(i) The annual MA capitation rate 

6 for each MA payment area for such year. 

7 ‘‘(ii) The risk and other factors to be 

8 used in adjusting such rates under sub9 section (a)(1)(A) for payments for months 

10 in such year. 

11 ‘‘(iii) With respect to each MA region 

12 and each MA regional plan for which a bid 

13 was submitted under section 1854, the MA 

14 region-specific non-drug monthly bench15 mark amount for that region for the year 

16 involved. 

17 ‘‘(iv) The major policy changes to the 

18 risk adjustment model, and the 5-star rat19 ing system established under subsection 

20 (o), that are determined to have an eco21 nomic impact.’’; and 

22 (3) in paragraph (2)— 

23 (A) by inserting ‘‘(or, for 2017 and each 

24 subsequent year, at least 60 days)’’ after ‘‘45 

25 days’’; and 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
4 

HR 2507 RFS

1 (B) by inserting ‘‘(for 2017 and each sub2 sequent year, of no less than 30 days)’’ after 

3 ‘‘opportunity’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 17, 2015. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS