alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



Dover Motorsports, Inc.

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual
Report of Dover Motorsports, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Patrick J.
Bagley, Senior Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: March 10, 2004



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ Patrick J. Bagley         
|Patrick J. Bagley             
|Senior Vice President-Finance,
|and Chief Financial Officer   



This certification
shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.
#### People *ex rel.*McCormack *v.*French *et al.,*Police Commissioners.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.*

May 23, 1890.)

Municipal Corporations—Discharge op Policeman.

The action of the police commissioners in discharging relator will not be disturbed on *certiorari*where the intoxication charged is proved by several witnesses, and relator’s defense that his condition resulted from taking medicine prescribed by a physician is supported only by a certificate of the physician that he prescribed for relator “ a mixture containing chloroform, ” the prescription not being produced.

*Certiorari*by Patrick McCormack to review the action of Stephen B. French and others, constituting the board of police commissioners, discharging relator from the police force.

Argued before Van Brunt, P. J., and Bartlett and Barrett, JJ.

*Edward Mackinley,*for relator. *Alexander B. Keyes,*for respondents.

Barrett, J.

This case comes directly within the principle of *People*v. *French,*110 N. Y. 494, 18 N. E. Rep. 133. The relator’s intoxication was clearly proved by a large number of witnesses. His defense was that his condition resulted from the taking of medicine prescribed by a physician. The prescription was not produced, but the physician certified that, “several days” before the relator’s trial, he liad prescribed “for the bearer, Mr. McCormack, a mixture containing chloroform.” It seems that the physician had never seen McCormack, but that the prescription and certificate were given to one McGuire, who was an acquaintance of McCormack’s, and who undertook to procure medical assistance for him. The entire story about the prescription, and the proof with regard to the administration of a mixture containing chloroform, were too vague, and even suspicious, to carry conviction, and we think the commissioners were entirely justified in disregarding the attempted explanation on that head. They were also justified in rejecting the relator’s .testimony in view of its evident incorrectness with regard to matters of detail, as to which the accusing witnesses could not have been mistaken. These witnesses all testified that when McCormack was brought to the station-house his clothing was dirty and dusty, and that he presented the appearance of a man who had been engaged in a fight. Yet the relator declared that all this was untrue, and that his clothing was then as clean as it was at the time of his trial. The preponderance of testimony was decidedly against the relator, and the proceedings should be affirmed. All concur.
#### In the Matter of Richard Pu, an Attorney, Appellant. Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Respondent.

Submitted February 5, 2007;

decided February 22, 2007

On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. Motion for leave to appeal denied.
Exhibit 32.1

 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Southern Copper Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Oscar González Rocha, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 
|                   | /s/ Oscar González Rocha         |
|------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                   | Oscar González Rocha             |
|                   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
| Date: November 4, 2005 |                                  |

 

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been provided to Southern Copper Corporation and will be retained by Southern Copper Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

49

----
#### Richard B. Fagan, Appellant, v Andrew P. Meloni, Respondent.

(Appeal No. 1.)

— Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Based upon the trial evidence, defendants’ motion for judgment at the close of plaintiff’s proof pursuant to CPLR 4401 was properly granted as a matter of law by the court. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, White, J. — libel.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Denman and Schnepp, JJ.
Exhibit 23.1 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Board of Directors 

Dover Motorsports, Inc.: 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-58779) on Form S-8 of Dover Motorsports, Inc. of our reports dated March 15, 2011, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Dover Motorsports, Inc. and subsidiaries asof December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010, and the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, which reports appear in the December 31, 2010 annual report on Form 10-K of Dover Motorsports, Inc. 

KPMG LLP 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

March 15, 2011
Exhibit 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

                       REMINGTON PRODUCTS COMPANY, L.L.C.




     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE  PRESENTS,  that each person whose name appears below
constitutes and appoints  Alexander R. Castaldi,  and Kris J. Kelley and each of
them,  his true and  lawful  attorneys-in-fact  and  agents,  with full power of
substitution  and  resubstitution,  for and in his name, place and stead, in any
and all  capacities  which  such  person  serves or may serve  with  respect  to
Remington  Products  Company,  L.L.C.  and Remington  Capital Corp., to sign the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Remington  Products Company,  L.L.C. and Remington
Capital  Corp.  for the fiscal  year ended  December  31,  2001,  and any or all
amendments  to such  Annual  Report,  and to file the  same,  with all  exhibits
thereto,  and other documents in connection  therewith,  with the Securities and
Exchange Commission,  granting unto said  attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each
of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite and  necessary to be done in and about the  premises,  as fully to all
intents and  purposes as he might or could do in person,  hereby  ratifying  and
confirming all that said  attorneys-in-fact  and agents or any of them, or their
or his substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

This power of attorney has been signed as of the ____ day of March, 2002, by the
following persons:


-----------------------------------         ------------------------------------
Neil P. DeFeo,                              Robert L. Rosner, Director
Chief Executive Officer, President
 and Director


-----------------------------------         ------------------------------------
Victor K. Kiam, III, Director               Kevin Mundt, Director


-----------------------------------         ------------------------------------
Norman W. Alpert, Director                  Daniel S. O'Connell, Director


-----------------------------------         ------------------------------------
Arthur J. Nagle, Director                   Steven M. Silver, Director


--------------------------------            ------------------------------------
William B. Connell, Director                Vernon A. Brunner, Director


--------------------------------            ------------------------------
Stephen P. Donovan, Director                Kris J. Kelley
                                            Vice President and Controller

-----------------------------------
Alexander R. Castaldi,
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
    and Administrative Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-04-00484-CV

In the Matter of J. B.

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 98TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. J-24,643, HONORABLE LEONARD RAY SAENZ, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

J.B. appeals from his adjudication as delinquent based on the offense of criminal

trespass. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 30.05 (West Supp. 2005). J.B. filed a plea to the jurisdiction

and motion to dismiss the petition based on the argument that he should have been charged with the

more specific offense of trespass on school grounds, a Class C misdemeanor over which the district

court lacked jurisdiction. See Tex. Educ. Code Ann. § 37.107 (West 1996). The trial court

overruled the plea to the jurisdiction. Pursuant to a written plea agreement, appellant stipulated to

commission of the offense of criminal trespass and was placed on in-home probation for six months.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

In a case squarely on point, this Court has overruled the same contention. See In re

J.M.R., 149 S.W.3d 289, 294-95 (Tex. App.—Austin 2004, no pet.). This Court held that the

criminal trespass statute and the school trespass statute were not in pari materia, that the State could

charge the juvenile under eitherstatute, and that the district court had jurisdiction over the allegation
2

of criminal trespass against the juvenile. Id; In re M.A.L., No. 03-04-00247-CV, 2005 Tex. App.

LEXIS 5509, at *2 (Tex. App.—Austin July 13, 2005) (mem. op.);In re K.M., No. 03-04-00315-CV,

at *1-2 (Tex. App.—Austin June 17, 2005, no pet.) (mem. op.). Accordingly, we affirm the

judgment of the district court.

 

W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Patterson and Puryear

Affirmed

Filed: May 12, 2006
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Forms S-8 No. 333-24789, 333-70831, 333-81089, 333-86735 and 333-40364)
pertaining to the 1994 Incentive and Non-Statutory Stock Option Plan, the 1995
Stock Plan, the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, options granted outside of any
plan, the Decisive Technology Corporation 1996 Stock Option Plan and the 1999
Non-Officer Stock Option Plan of MessageMedia, Inc. and in the Registration
Statements (Forms S-3 No. 333-42855, 333-70959, 333-42855, 333-70959, 333-81081,
333-86731, and 333-89967) of MessageMedia, Inc. and the related Prospectus of
our report dated February 15, 2001, except for Notes 1 and 14 as to which the
date is February 23, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
and schedule of MessageMedia, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended December 31, 2000.

                                                   /s/ ERNST & YOUNG, LLP

Denver, Colorado
March 27, 2001
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-11791) pertaining to the 1996 Incentive Stock Plan, 1996
Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan and 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of
Service Experts, Inc. of our report dated February 12, 1997, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Service Experts, Inc. included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
 
Nashville, Tennessee
February 18, 1997
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2458 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2458

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 2, 2016

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 5351 Lapalco Boulevard in Marrero, Louisiana, as the ``Lionel R. 
                  Collins, Sr. Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIONEL R. COLLINS, SR. POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 5351 Lapalco Boulevard in Marrero, Louisiana, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Lionel R. Collins, Sr. Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lionel R. 
Collins, Sr. Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 1, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### MITCHELL, Respondent, v. ROCHESTER RY. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fifth Department.

March 27, 1894.)

Action by Annie Mitchell against the Rochester Railway Company.

Argued before DWIGHT, P. J., and LEWIS, HAIGHT, and BRADLEY, JJ.

No opinion. Order granting new trial appealed from affirmed, with costs on opinion of Rumsey, J., at circuit 25 N. Y. Supp. 744.
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 74 (Monday, April 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20472-20473]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9445]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

``Conference on Challenges in Health Disparity in the New 
Millennium: A Call to Action''

    Notice is hereby given of the NIH Office of Research on Minority 
Health (ORMH) Conference on Challenges in Health Disparity in the New 
Millennium: A Call to Action, which will be held April 16-19, 2000, at 
the

[[Page 20473]]

Hyatt Regency Washington on Capitol Hill, 400 New Jersey Avenue, NW, 
Washington, D. C. 20001. The conference begins at 8:00 a.m. on April 
17, 8:00 a.m. on April 18, and 8:30 a.m. on April 19.
    The Office of Research on Minority Health (ORMH), Office of the 
Director, National Institutes of Health (NIH), is convening this 
conference. ORMH is a central leadership entity at the NIH for issues 
related to minority health research and research training. Reports of 
progress and accomplishments since the founding of ORMH in 1990 and 
developing a strategic plan for future actions for eliminating health 
research and research training disparities comprise the agenda of the 
conference.
    Specific conference objectives include:
     Recommending a framework for the ORMH to address 
continuing disparity in health status of the US population and the 
international community through the Minority Health Strategic Plan;
     Highlighting the role of the ORMH to address disparity in 
health status through basic and clinical research and research training 
in biomedical and behavioral sciences; and
     Promoting partnerships with leaders in Congress, 
associations, academic institutions, industry, community-based 
organizations, and other Federal agencies to help eliminate health 
disparity.
    The primary sponsor of this conference is ORMH. Advance information 
on the conference program and conference registration materials maybe 
obtained from Debra Rainey, LCLM, LLC, Inc., 1299 Lamberton Drive, 
Suite 205, Silver Spring, Maryland 20902 (telephone: 301-593-2800).

    Dated: April 7, 2000.
Yvonne Maddox,
Acting Deputy Director, National Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. 00-9445 Filed 4-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-U
```
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

_________________________________

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

Complainant

vs.

DOUGLAS LEE BROUGHTON

Respondent

_________________________________

Docket Number 2023-0362

Enforcement Activity No. 7803984

CONSENT ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

On November 8, 2023, the parties in this case submitted a Motion for Approval of a 

Settlement Agreement and Entry of Consent Order to be approved as a settlement of the case 

under 33 C.F.R. § 20.502.

I have carefully reviewed the terms of the Settlement Agreement and find that it is fair 

and reasonable and in substantial compliance with the requirements of 33 C.F.R. § 20.502.

ORDER

Upon consideration of record, it is hereby ORDERED that the Settlement Agreement is 

APPROVED in full and incorporated herein by reference. This Consent Order shall constitute 

full, final, and complete adjudication of this proceeding.

Done and Dated November 17, 2023 at

New Orleans, LA

_________________________________

HON. BRIAN J. CURLEY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Beverly Taylor, Appellant.

The defendant’s contention that he was deprived of a fair *843trial as a result of improper comments by the prosecutor is without merit. The majority of the remarks were made in response to similar comments by defense counsel. In addition, where appropriate, the trial court gave prompt curative instructions which dissipated any prejudice the comments may have engendered.

Equally without merit are the defendant’s arguments regarding the trial court’s charge, which, contrary to his contention, were not all preserved for appellate review. The instructions on the issue of identification and the element of intent were more than adequate, and the court’s marshaling of the evidence did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial. Mollen, P. J., Brown, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2444 

To authorize the Commissioner of Food and Drugs to award grants for 

studying the process of continuous drug manufacturing. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 19, 2015 

Mr. GUTHRIE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To authorize the Commissioner of Food and Drugs to award 

grants for studying the process of continuous drug manufacturing. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GRANTS FOR STUDYING THE PROCESS OF CON4 TINUOUS DRUG MANUFACTURING. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Commissioner of Food and 

6 Drugs may award grants to institutions of higher edu7 cation and nonprofit organizations for the purpose of 

8 studying and recommending improvements to the process 

9 of continuous manufacturing of drugs and biological prodVerDate Sep 11 2014 06:12 May 28, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2444.IH H2444

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2444 IH

1 ucts and similar innovative monitoring and control tech2 niques. 

3 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

4 (1) The term ‘‘drug’’ has the meaning given to 

5 such term in section 201 of the Federal Food, Drug, 

6 and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321). 

7 (2) The term ‘‘biological product’’ has the 

8 meaning given to such term in section 351(i) of the 

9 Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262(i)). 

10 (3) The term ‘‘institution of higher education’’ 

11 has the meaning given to such term in section 101 

12 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 

13 1001). 

14 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 

15 authorized to be appropriated $5,000,000 for each of fis16 cal years 2016 through 2020 to carry out this section. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2021507EN.01001101.xml

| 16.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 507/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 507/11

---

Special report No 27/2021

EU support to tourism: need for a fresh strategic orientation and a better funding approach

(2021/C 507/06)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that special report No 27/2021 ‘EU support to tourism: need for a fresh strategic orientation and a better funding approach’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ Internet: http://eca.europa.eu

---