alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 

********************************** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA * 

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD * 

*- - Docket No-: 99-0427 

* Case No: PA99001940 

vs. * 

* 

GREGORY B. MUSK * 

* 

********************************** 

ORDER 

1. The Decision and Order in this case was issued on November 13, 2000. It found that the 

Jurisdictional and Factual Allegations of the Complaint were Proved by a Preponderance of 

the Evidence. The Complaint alleged that Mr. Musk committed an act of Misconduct for 

failing to submit to a random chemical test for dangerous drugs. Specifically, the Decision 

held that the Respondent substituted a urine sample in connection with a chemical test for 

dangerous drugs and that such act constituted a "refusal to test." 

The parties were afforded an opportunity to submit recommendations with regard to the 

Order to be issued against Respondent's Coast Guard License and Merchant Mariner's 

Document and those pleadings have been received. 

2. I have considered the evidence of record, the submissions of the parties, and the applicable 

law. In view ofthe Commandant's Decision in Appeal Decision 2578 (CALLAHAN) and 

the Third Circuit's holding in Exxon Shipping Company v. Exxon Sean1an's Union, 73 F.3d 

1287 (3rd Cir. 1996) the Investigating Officer's recommendation that Mr. Musk's credentials 

be revoked is approved. 
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT Coast Guard License No. 683036 and all other 

Coast Guard issued licenses and documents issued to Gregory B. Musk are hereby REVOKED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT License No. 683036 and all other Coast Guard 

licenses and documents issued to Mr. Musk must be surrendered to the Coast Guard Marine 

Safety Office, Miami on or before January 26, 2001. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Gregory B. Musk is prohibited from serving 

under the authority of License No. 683036 or any other license or Merchant Mariner's document 

issued by the United States Coast Guard after January 26, 2001. 

Dated o~ the &day of January 2001 

Norfolk, Virginia 

0 .Jl /) OJ~~~/_/}/ (/~tLL ?( c;;::;:;:;~ ~e.. PETER A. FITZPATRIC 

Administrative Law Judg~ 

United States Coast Guard 

2
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                              Consent of KPMG LLP


The Board of Directors
Trigon Healthcare, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-22463, 333-26187, 333-26189 and 333-26191) on Form S-8 of Trigon Healthcare,
Inc. of our report dated February 9, 2001, relating to the consolidated balance
sheets of Trigon Healthcare, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and
1999, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in
shareholders' equity and comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2000, which report is
incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K.  We also consent to the
incorporation by reference in the aforementioned registration statements of our
report dated February 9, 2001, relating to the financial statement schedule of
Trigon Healthcare, Inc., which report appears in this Form 10-K.


/s/ KPMG LLP

Richmond, Virginia
March 26, 2001
Listen

# Public Briefings

Visit the Commission’s YouTube page to view recordings of all recent briefings.

----

Civil Rights Implications of the Federal Use of Facial Recognition Technology
Event Date: March 8, 2024

Racial Disparities in Violent Crime Victimization in the United States
Event Date: November 17, 2023

The Federal Response to Anti-Asian Racism in the United States
Event Date: March 24, 2023

Civil Rights Implications of Disaster Relief: Hurricane María in Puerto Rico
Event Date: December 10, 2021

Civil Rights Implications of Disaster Relief: Hurricane Harvey in Texas
Event Date: October 21, 2021

Civil Rights and Protections in the Federal Response to Hurricanes Maria and Harvey
Event Date: June 25, 2021

The Civil Rights Implications of Cash Bail
Event Date: February 26, 2021

Racial Disparities in Maternal Health
Event Date: November 13, 2020

COVID-19 in Indian Country
Event Date: July 17, 2020

Subminimum Wages: Impacts on the Civil Rights of People with Disabilities
Event Date: November 15, 2019

-  1 
-  2 
-  3 
-   ...  
-   Next  
-   Last  

-  Event Calendar 
-  Public Briefings    -  Public Comments 
-  Commission Business Meetings 
-  Advisory Committees Meetings 
-  Archives
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Thompson, Appellant.

*688The defendant challenges the denial of that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress "buy money” found on his person after his alleged sale of cocaine to an undercover police officer. Specifically, the defendant contends that suppression of the money is warranted because the People failed to present evidence that the content of the radio communication from the undercover police officer to the arresting officer was sufficient to constitute probable cause to arrest the defendant.

Initially, we note that while this issue was raised upon the defendant’s prior appeal from his conviction for possession of marihuana in the second degree *(see, People v Thompson,*108 AD2d 942), the defendant is not collaterally estopped from pursuing the issue on this appeal because a determination thereof was not necessary upon the prior appeal. However, as we stated in dictum therein, the issue of the sufficiency of the content of the radio communication has not been preserved for appellate review as a matter of law *(cf. People v Tutt,*38 NY2d 1011; *People v Jones,*81 AD2d 22). At no point was this issue "interjected at the fact-finding level in such a manner and at such a time as to fairly apprise the court and the opposing party of the nature and scope of the matter contested, and to allow the necessary evidentiary treatment and trial-level advocacy to be pursued” *(People v Jones, supra,*pp 41-42). There is no merit to the defendant’s contention that the failure of his trial counsel to preserve this issue for appellate review constituted ineffective assistance of counsel so as to warrant reversal *(see, People v Morris,*100 AD2d 630, *affd*64 NY2d 803). Lazer, J. P., Niehoff, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of eLinear, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on  the  date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevan Casey, Chief
Executive  Officer  of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as  adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the  best  of  my  knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company



/s/ Kevan Casey
-----------------------------------
Kevan Casey,
Chief Executive Officer
November 15, 2004

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to eLinear, Inc. and will be retained by eLinear, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


<PAGE>
#### SHEEHAN v. CARVALHO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 15, 1897.)

Action by John C. Sheehan against Solomon S. Carvalho.

No opinion. Motion denied, upon payment of §10 costs, in order to give appellant an opportunity to move at special term to open his default. See 42 N. Y. Supp. 222.
Skip to main content

Privacy Policy•Site map

# Pro Se Information (Individuals Representing Themselves)

Vaccine Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims

Guidelines for Practice Under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program

Sample Petition

Sample Petition Certificate of Service

Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis

Petition Cover Sheet (Form 2, RCFC)

Fee Schedule

Public Release of Rulings and Decisions

Vaccine Attorneys
> 
The Office of Special Masters—an office within the United States Court of Federal Claims, *see* 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(c)—maintains a list of attorneys as a service to petitioners seeking compensation under the National Vaccine Program established by the Department of Health and Human Services. *See* 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1, 12(a).

Howard T. Markey National Courts Building • 717 Madison Place, NW, Washington, DC 20439 • 202-357-6400
Ex parte Mark Alvear

– BRIEF FOR APPEALLANT Page 15 

## CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

I certify that this document Appellant's Brief was prepared with Microsoft

Word 2013, and that, according to that program’s word

- count function, the

sections covered by TRAP 9.4(i)(1) contain 1,060 words.

__________/s/ Christopher L King

_______________ Christopher L King ACCEPTED

06-15-00131-CR

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

12/16/2015 7:25:03 AM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK
#### TODD, Respondent, v. EIGHMIE, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

December 22, 1896.)

Action by Judson S. Todd against George D. Eighmie. Reuben H. Underhill, for appellant. D. B. Ogden, for respondent.

No opinion. Motion for reargument and for leave to appeal to the court of appeals denied, with §10 costs. See 41 N. Y. Supp. 1013.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          10,554
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,037
<INVENTORY>                                     11,581
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                36,866
<PP&E>                                          23,326
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,102
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  52,259
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,494
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           138
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,627
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    52,259
<SALES>                                        102,203
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               102,203
<CGS>                                           73,183
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,562
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,064
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,944
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,120
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,120
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.36
        

</TABLE>
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

September 28, 2005

Before

Hon. Richard A. Posner, Circuit Judge

Hon. Frank H. Easterbrook, Circuit Judge

Hon. Michael S. Kanne, Circuit Judge

No. 05-2318

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

FREDDIE J. BOOKER, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin.

No. 03 CR 26

John C. Shabaz, Judge

.

O R D E R

On remand for resentencing in accordance with the Supreme Court’s decision in this case, the judge again imposed a 30–year sentence, which was within the guidelines range. However, the judge properly did not treat the guidelines as mandatory, but instead explained at length and convincingl y why the guidelines
sentence was consistent with the statutory sentencing factors, in view of the gravity of the defendant’s crime and his long criminal record, notwithstanding the defendant’s age (40). A guidelines sentence is presu mptively reasonable, U nited States v. Mykytiuk , 415 F.3d 606 (7th Cir. 2005), and there is nothing here to rebut the presumption. The judgment is therefore

A FFIRMED

. UNPUBLISHED ORDER Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53
November 1 , 2011



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NOEMY LANDAVERDE , Appellant

NO. 14

- 11

- 00143

- CV V.

THE ESTATE OF HABIBO LLAH ABEDINZADEH , Appellee

____________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, The Estate of Habibollah Abedinzadeh, signed January 18, 2011, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED

.
We order appellant, Noemy Landaverde, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF FIRST COMMONWEALTH, INC. AS OF SEPTEMBER
30, 1996, AND FOR THE NINE MONTHS THEN ENDED, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         $10,820
<SECURITIES>                                    $3,015
<RECEIVABLES>                                   $2,421
<ALLOWANCES>                                      $231
<INVENTORY>                                         $0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               $18,704
<PP&E>                                          $3,131
<DEPRECIATION>                                  $1,579
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 $27,076
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           $7,725
<BONDS>                                             $0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               $0
<PREFERRED>                                         $0
<COMMON>                                            $4
<OTHER-SE>                                     $19,222
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   $27,076
<SALES>                                             $0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               $31,578
<CGS>                                               $0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  $28,648
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    $0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    $0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  $0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 $3,412
<INCOME-TAX>                                    $1,378
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             $2,034
<DISCONTINUED>                                      $0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     $0
<CHANGES>                                           $0
<NET-INCOME>                                    $2,034
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.57
        

</TABLE>
FONTENELLE RESERVOIRLatitude: 42.026Longitude: -110.068Elevation: 6418

FONTENELLE RESERVOIR

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Pocket Creek Site Page...



Pocket Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Larsen Creek Site Page...



Larsen Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Big Sandy Opening Site Page...



Big Sandy Opening

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Blind Bull Sum Site Page...



Blind Bull Sum

Courtesy NRCS - Go to East Rim Divide Site Page...



East Rim Divide

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Elkhart Park G.S. Site Page...



Elkhart Park G.S.

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Gros Ventre Summit Site Page...



Gros Ventre Summit

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Indian Creek Site Page...



Indian Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Kendall R.S. Site Page...



Kendall R.S.

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Loomis Park Site Page...



Loomis Park

Courtesy NRCS - Go to New Fork Lake Site Page...



New Fork Lake

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Snider Basin Site Page...



Snider Basin

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Spring Creek Divide Site Page...



Spring Creek Divide

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Triple Peak Site Page...



Triple Peak

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Gunsight Pass Site Page...



Gunsight Pass
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-13-00021-CR

DEBORAH TIMMONS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 114th District Court

Smith County, Texas

Trial Court No. 114-1126-10

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Deborah Timmons, appellant, has filed with this Court a motion to dismiss her appeal. 

The motion was signed by both Timmons and her counsel in compliance with the rules. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). We grant the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

Josh R. Morriss, III

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: March 5, 2013

Date Decided: March 6, 2013

Do Not Publish
Exhibit 32.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                SECTION 906 OF
                        THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



          In connection with the Quarterly Report of Blount International,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, James S. Osterman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
          report.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Blount International, Inc. and will be retained by Blount
International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.


Date: July 30, 2004


/s/ James S. Osterman
---------------------
James S. Osterman
President and
Chief Executive Officer
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2021448EN.01000601.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 5.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 448/6 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10439 – DP WORLD / SYNCREON)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 448/05)

1.

On 25 October 2021, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2021448EN.01000601-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | DP World Limited (‘DP World’, United Arab Emirates), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | syncreon Newco B.V. (‘syncreon’, United States). |

DP World acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of syncreon.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for DP World Group: port terminal operations, maritime services, free trade zones and cargo handling and logistics services (i.e., discharging and loading of vessels and related activities) worldwide. |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for syncreon: supply logistics worldwide with a focus on the design and operation of supply chain solutions for customers primarily active in the automotive and technology sectors. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2021448EN.01000601-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10439 – DP WORLD / SYNCREON

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2021448EN.01000601-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2021448EN.01000601-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---