alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Pryor *v.*The State.

*Murder.*

(Decided May 14, 1914.

65 South. 331.)

1. *Appeal and Error; Review; Exceptions.*— In the absence of any exceptions reserved to any part of the court’s oral charge, objections thereto cannot be reviewed on appeal.

2. *New Trial; Criminal Cases.*— The action of the trial court in denying a motion for new trial in a criminal case cannot be reviewed on appeal.

3. *Criminal Lmo; Venue; Change.*— Under the evidence in this case the court would not have been justified under the statute in granting defendant’s motion for a change of venue.

Appeal from Gadsden City Court.

Heard before Hon. James A. Bilbro.

Walter Pryor was convicted of murder and lie appeals.

Affirmed.

Roper & Stephens, for appellant.

The application for a change of venue was filed in time. — § 7851, Code 1907, as amended Acts 1909, p. 212. The evidence fails to sustain the degree of homicide as found by the jury. —Clark’s Manual of Criminal Law, 60. A constitutional question is always reviewable, and it is not denied that Joyner, one of the jurors, had only been a resident of Etowah county for four months, and that he sat in the case and voted for defendant’s conviction. — § 6, Constitution 1901; 4 L. R. A. 360; 18 L. R. A. 473; 77 Ga. 108.

R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and T. H. Seay, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

The application for a change of venue came too late and no good excuse is shown *therefor.*— Fallen *v. State,*86 Ala. 13; *28
      *Byers v. State,*105 Ala. 31. The evidence did not authorize the granting of the motion in any *event.*— Godau *v. State,*60 South. 908. This court cannot review the action of the trial court in refusing to grant a motion for a new trial in a criminal *case.*— Barrage *v. State,*113 Ala. 108.

McCLELLAN, J. —

The appellant has been adjudged guilty of the murder of George Quest. He is sentenced to death.

The application for change of venue was not erroneously denied. The evidence shown in the bill of exceptions was not sufficient to invite a conclusion that the defendant could not be given fair and impartial trial in Etowah county. The newspaper assertions and comments, published immediately after the homicide, were not of a character to so generally inflame the public mind to the prejudice of the defendant as to justify a finding in favor of a change of *venue.*—Godau *v. State,*179 Ala. 27, 60 South. 908.

Without attempting the entirely unnecessary service of stating the evidence, which has been carefully considered, it will suffice to say that the degree of the crime charged, as well as the major question of guilt vel non, was for the jury.

There is no exception reserved to any part of the oral charge of the court. Hence the argument of counsel for appellant on that subject cannot be considered.

The ruling of the court denying the motion for a new trial cannot be the subject of review on *appeal*.—Bur*rage v. State,*113 Ala. 108, 21 South. 213; *Barnett v. State,*165 Ala. 50, 59, 51 South. 299.

No error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

All the Justices concur.
**Exhibit 23.1**

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Board of Directors 

Dover Motorsports, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-58779) on FormS-8 of Dover Motorsports, Inc. of our reports dated March 9, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Dover Motorsports, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements ofoperations and comprehensive (loss) earnings and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as ofDecember 31, 2006 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, which reports appear in the December 31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K of Dover Motorsports, Inc. Our report datedMarch 9, 2007 on the consolidated financial statements refers to accounting changes as a result of the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment,” effective January 1, 2006, andStatement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans,” on December 31, 2006. 

KPMG LLP 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

March 9, 2007
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 21.1




                 DESCRIPTION OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

The Company has six wholly-owned subsidiaries, (i) EMB Mortgage Corporation, a
California corporation, which is not presently doing business (ii) Investment
Consultants, Inc., a Colorado corporation, which is not presently doing
business; (iii) EMB Financial Services, Inc., a Colorado corporation, which is
doing business as a commercial mortgage broker; (iv) AmeriTeleCon, Inc., a
Nevada corporation, which is doing business as a distributor of communications
hardware and software; (v) American Residential Funding, Inc., a Nevada
corporation, which is doing business as a residential mortgage broker; and (vi)
Residential Mortgage Corporation, a Nevada corporation, which is doing business
as a residential mortgage broker.
EX-10.11





 Exhibit 10.11 

Plan Amendment 

AMENDMENT TO THE 
 GINKGO
BIOWORKS, INC. 
 2014 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 

Effective September 9, 2019 

This Amendment to the Ginkgo Bioworks, Inc. 2014 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (the “Plan”) is effective as of the date
first set forth above, such amendment having been approved by the Board of Directors of Ginkgo Bioworks, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on September 9, 2019 and approved by the holders of a majority of the
Company’s outstanding shares of voting capital stock on September 9, 2019, in each case in accordance with Section 11(d) of the Plan. Capitalized but undefined terms shall have the meanings provided in the Plan. 

As of result of the foregoing approvals, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 

1.     Section 4(a) of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 

“(a) Number of Shares. Subject to adjustment under Section 9, Awards may be made under the Plan (any or all of which Awards may be in
the form of Incentive Stock Options (as defined in Section 5(b)) for up to such number of shares of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, of the Company (the “Common Stock”), as is equal to the sum of: 

(1) 1,752,404; and 

(2) the number of shares of Common Stock subject to awards granted under the Existing Plan which awards expire, terminate
or are otherwise surrendered, canceled, forfeited or repurchased by the Company pursuant to a contractual repurchase right (subject, however, in the case of Incentive Stock Options to any limitations of the Code); and. 

If any Award expires or is terminated, surrendered or canceled without having been fully exercised, is forfeited in whole or in part
(including as the result of shares of Common Stock subject to such Award being repurchased by the Company at the original issuance price pursuant to a contractual repurchase right), or results in any Common Stock not being issued, the unused Common
Stock covered by such Award shall again be available for the grant of Awards under the Plan. Further, shares of Common Stock tendered to the Company by a Participant to exercise an Award shall be added to the number of shares of Common Stock
available for the grant of Awards under the Plan. However, in the case of Incentive Stock Options, the two immediately preceding sentences shall be subject to any limitations under the Code. Shares issued under the Plan may consist in whole or in
part of authorized but unissued shares or treasury shares.” 












 The undersigned, being the duly elected and acting Secretary of the Company, hereby
certifies that the foregoing amendment was duly approved and adopted by the Board of Directors and the Stockholders of the Company effective as of the date first referenced above. 

 

			
	By:	 	 /s/  Bartholomew Canton

		 	      Bartholomew Canton, Secretary
EXHIBIT 4


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF
        CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In  connection  with the  report of  Canadian  Natural  Resources  Limited  (the
"Company")  on the Form 40-F for the fiscal  year  ending  December  31, 2008 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Steve W. Laut,  certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

DATED this 25th day of March, 2009.



SIGNED "STEVE W. LAUT"
----------------------
Steve W. Laut
President and Chief Operating Officer (Principal Executive Officer),
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
| datetime   | inflow volume |
|------------|---------------|
| 2006-10-02 | -29.65289     |
| 2006-10-03 | -163.80992    |
| 2006-10-04 | -86.61157     |
| 2006-10-05 | 6.80992       |
| 2006-10-06 | -12.77686     |
| 2006-10-07 | 24.22314      |
| 2006-10-08 | -9.38017      |
| 2006-10-09 | -26.57851     |
| 2006-10-10 | 99.61983      |
| 2006-10-11 | 99.2314       |
| 2006-10-12 | 169.43802     |
| 2006-10-13 | 188.03306     |
| 2006-10-14 | 170.42975     |
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Amber Keyes v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 6

- 00 684

- CR

Trial court case number: 1 45 0024

Trial court: 176 th District Court of Harris County, Texas

Appellant’s court

- appointed counsel filed a brief concluding that the above

referenced appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct.

1396, 1400 (1967). Appellant, acting pro se, has filed a motion requesting access to a

copy of the appellate record for use in preparing a response to appointed counsel’s brief.

See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 315, 318

– 20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Appellant also

request s a n extension of time to file h er pro se response to counsel’s Anders brief. We

grant the motion

.

We order the trial court clerk, no later than 10 days from the date of this order, to

provide a copy of the record, including the clerk’s record, the reporter’s record, and any

supplemental records, to the appellant. The trial court clerk shall further certify to this

Court, within 15 days of the date of this order, the date upon which delivery of the record

to the appellant is made.

Appellant’s response to h er appointed counsel’s brief shall be filed within 45

days of the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: March 2, 2017
Listen

# Seize the Day: Eliminate Civil Forfeiture in Massachusetts

January 3, 2024

The Massachusetts State Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights undertook an investigation of this practice that included analysis of individual and aggregated cases, findings from independent researchers, testimony from non-governmental experts in non-profit organizations, and elected officials with a wide range of experience within the system of civil asset forfeiture in the state. We found that there are serious flaws at all levels of civil asset forfeiture practices and procedures.

In addition, we conducted a systematic analysis of a geographically weighted sample of cases of civil asset forfeiture filed across all 11 counties in Massachusetts between January 2019 and June 2022. We reviewed all documents available from the Massachusetts Trial Court website to ascertain the timeline between seizure and forfeiture filing, types of property seized, and the circumstances leading up to the seizure and forfeiture filing. We noted the location of the seizure, the county in which the forfeiture was filed, and any demographic or other characteristics of the individuals from whom property was seized. Given the amount of documents involved, we completed a review of a total of 45 cases during this time period.

Report

Press Release

Massachusetts

-  All Reports 
-  Annual Statutory Enforcement 
-  Briefing Reports 
-  Advisory Committees Reports 
-  Budget and Performance 
-  FOIA Reports 
-  Data Inventory Program 
-  Civil Rights Complaints 
-  Historical Publications 
-  Archives
EXHIBIT
32.2
  
 PERICOM
SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
 PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
  In
connection with this quarterly report of Pericom Semiconductor Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 27, 2008 (the
“Report”), I, Angela Chen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
knowledge:
 (1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 (2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
and for the periods indicated.
 
  February
4, 2009
   By:
              /s/Angela
      Chen
                Angela
      Chen
                Chief
      Financial Officer
                Pericom
      Semiconductor Corporation
EXHIBIT
32.1





PERICOM
SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with this quarterly report of Pericom Semiconductor Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended October 2, 2010 (the
“Report”), I, Alex C. Hui, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
knowledge:


(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and


(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
and for the periods indicated.





November
9, 2010




By:
              /s/ Alex C. HuiAlex
      C. HuiChief
      Executive OfficerPericom
      Semiconductor Corporation
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #17127 and #17128; Missouri Disaster Number MO-00111]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Missouri (FEMA-4612-DR), dated 09/01/2021. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms, Straight-line Winds, Tornadoes, and Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         06/24/2021 through 07/01/2021.
 DATES: Issued on 09/01/2021. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         11/01/2021. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         06/01/2022.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 09/01/2021, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Andrew, Audrain, Boone, Buchanan, Caldwell, Callaway, Carroll, Chariton, Clinton, Cooper, Daviess, Grundy, Holt, Howard, Lincoln, Livingston, Moniteau, Montgomery, Ralls, Ray, Saline. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.000Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.000*For Economic Injury:*Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 17127 B and for economic injury is 17128 0. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) James Rivera, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2021-19664 Filed 9-10-21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

No. 05

- 1119 L

Filed : May 13 , 2015

****************************************

*

ST. BERNARD PARISH GOVERNMENT *

AND OTHER OWNERS OF REAL *

PROPERTY IN ST. BERNARD PARISH *

OR THE LOWER NIN TH WARD OF THE *

CITY OF NEW ORLEANS, *

*

Plaintiff s

, *

*

v. *

*

THE UNITED STATES, *

*

Defendant. *

*

****************************************

ORDER

On May 6, 2015, the court convene d a settlement conference at the United States District

Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, durin g which the parties discussed three options:

mediation; certification or interlocutory appeal of the court’s May 1, 2015 Memorandum Opinion

And Order On Liability Regarding A Temporary Taking By Flooding to the United States Court

of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; or proceeding to final judgment.

On May 13, 2015, the Governm ent informed the court th at it would need ninety days to

det ermine which of these options to pursue.

Accordingly , the Government is ordered to file a notice inform ing the cou rt of its decision

on or before Augus t 10, 2015

.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Susan G. Braden

SUSAN G. BRADEN

Judge
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 

_______________________________ 

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 

Complainant 

vs. 

MICHAEL P. MURPHY 

Respondent. 

_______________________ 

Docket Number CG S&R 06-0155 

CG Case No. 2608223 

CONSENT ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Issued by: Walter J. Brudzinski, Administrative Law Judge

Issued: June 27, 2006

On April 24, 2006, the parties in this case submitted a Motion for Approval of a 

Settlement Agreement and Entry of Consent Order as a settlement of the case under 33 

CFR § 20.502. 

 I have carefully reviewed the terms of the Settlement Agreement and find that it 

is fair and reasonable and in substantial compliance with the requirements of 33 CFR § 

20.502. 
ORDER

Upon consideration of the record, it is hereby ORDERED that the Settlement 

Agreement is APPROVED in full and incorporated herein by reference. This Consent 

Order shall constitute full, final and complete adjudication of this proceeding. 

Done and dated June 27, 2006 

New York, New York 

WALTER J. BRUDZINSKI 

Administrative Law Judge 

United States Coast Guard 

2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have this day served the foregoing Consent Order Approving 

Settlement Agreement by the methods indicated upon the following parties and limited 

participants (or designated representatives) in this proceeding at the addresses indicated as 

follows: 

LT Ronald Murphree 

USCG Sector Seattle 

1519 Alaskan Way South, Building 1 

Seattle, WA 98134-1192 

Telephone: (206) 217-6129 

Facsimile: (206) 217-6213 

(via facsimile) 

 

(via first class mail) 

USCG ALJ Docketing Center 

40 S. Gay Street, Rm. 412 

Baltimore, MD 21202 

Telephone: (410) 962-1734 

Facsimile: (410) 962-1746 

(via facsimile) 

Done and dated June 27, 2006 

New York, New York 

 ___________________________________ 

 Regina V. Thompson 

 Paralegal Specialist to the 

 Administrative Law Judge 

 Telephone: (212) 668-2970 

 Facsimile: (212) 825-1230

3
Types of Survival Craft 

Written By Author Unknown

Doing a commercial fishing vessel (CFV) inspection? Did you read the above? 

Great! But wait! To properly determine whether the vessel is equipped with 

the right survival craft you need to know what are the different kinds of 

survival craft. Here’s some help from the Coast Guard’s Commercial Fishing 

Vessel Safety Flyer Issue 16, Survival Craft.

Inflatable Life Raft: Series 160.151 / .051

Inflatable Buoyant Apparatus: Series 160.010

Life Float: Series 160.027 

Buoyant Apparatus: Series 160.010

Rigid Liferaft: Series 160.018 / .118

A buoyant apparatus may be substituted for the otherwise required survival 

craft on a vessel more than 36 feet in length with 3 or fewer persons on board 

and which operates within 12 miles of the coastline.
There are strict regulations regarding the requirements for survival craft and 

a careful reading of 46 CFR 28.120 is absolutely necessary when determining 

whether a vessel’s survival craft meets regulatory requirements.
Exhibit 10.38
 WAIVER AND SIXTH AMENDMENT TO  REVOLVING CREDIT AND TERM LOAN AGREEMENT
 th
 RECITALS:
      Waiver of Compliance with Section 6.1 for Certain Period.
 Waiver of Compliance with Section 6.2 for Certain Period
 Waiver of Compliance with Section 6.6 for Certain Period.




---



##### 



Financial Covenant Waiver
 Cancellation of Revolving Loan Commitment
 Mandatory Principal Prepayment
 Full Payment of Outstanding Term Loan
 Representations and Warranties
 Reaffirmation Article IV
 No Default
 Payment of Expenses
 Conditions
    2




---



##### 



Counterparts
 Severability; Headings
 Continuing Effect of Other Documents
 GOVERNING LAW . THIS AMENDMENT AND THE RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE
PARTIES UNDER THIS AMENDMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED AND INTERPRETED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
 3




---



##### 



FIRST ACCEPTANCE CORPORATIONBy:
    
    /s/ Michael BodayleTitle:
    
    TreasurerSUNTRUST BANK, as Administrative Agent and as a
LenderBy:
    
    /s/ William ChristensenTitle:
    
    DirectorFIRST BANK, as a LenderBy:
    
    /s/ Doug RemkeTitle:
    
    Vice President
 4




---



##### 



CONSENT OF GUARANTORS
  USAUTO HOLDINGS, INC., as a GuarantorBy:
    
    /s/ Michael BodayleName: Michael BodayleTitle: TreasurerTRANSIT AUTOMOBILE CLUB, INC., as a GuarantorBy:
    
    /s/ Michael BodayleName: Michael BodayleTitle: TreasurerALABAMA ACCEPTANCE INSURANCE AGENCY, INC., as a GuarantorBy:
    
    /s/ Michael BodayleName: Michael BodayleTitle: TreasurerACCEPTANCE INSURANCE AGENCY OF TENNESSEE, INC., as a GuarantorBy:
    
    /s/ Michael BodayleName: Michael BodayleTitle: Treasurer
 5




---



##### 



ACCEPTANCE INSURANCE AGENCY, INC., as a GuarantorBy:
    
    /s/ Michael BodayleName: Michael BodayleTitle: TreasurerFIRST ACCEPTANCE SERVICES, INC., as a GuarantorBy:
    
    /s/ Michael BodayleName: Michael BodayleTitle: TreasurerACCEPTANCE INSURANCE AGENCY OF ILLINOIS, INC., as a GuarantorBy:
    
    /s/ Michael BodayleName: Michael BodayleTitle: TreasurerLNC HOLDINGS, INC., as a GuarantorBy:
    
    /s/ Michael BodayleName: Michael BodayleTitle: TreasurerACCEPTANCE INSURANCE AGENCY OF TEXAS, INC., as a GuarantorBy:
    
    /s/ Michael BodayleName: Michael BodayleTitle: Treasurer
 6