alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-37,455] 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation was initiated on March 7, 2000, in response to a petition filed on the same date on behalf of workers at McCain Foods, Burley, Idaho.

The company official submitting the petition has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

Signed in Washington, D.C., this 4th day of April, 2000.

Grant D. Beale,

Program Manager, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 00-9522  Filed 4-14-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
balance sheets and statements of operations and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements. 
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                            333 
<SECURITIES>                                        0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                  45,078 
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (370) 
<INVENTORY>                                    36,684 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               84,948       
<PP&E>                                         94,070      
<DEPRECIATION>                                (7,489)    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                521,406      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          74,087    
<BONDS>                                       294,759  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                         0 
<COMMON>                                            0 
<OTHER-SE>                                    148,742       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  521,406         
<SALES>                                       344,113          
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              344,113          
<CGS>                                         143,522          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 288,332          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               22,549       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  180      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             24,762       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 8,290       
<INCOME-TAX>                                    3,316      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             4,974      
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0      
<CHANGES>                                           0  
<NET-INCOME>                                    4,974 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0 
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-18981, 333-18983, 333-18985, 333-18987, 333-18989, 333-29153, 333-63493, 333-36646, 333-46126, 333-67710, 333-133346 and 333-137569 and 333-152349, all on Forms S-8 of SRS Labs, Inc., of our report dated February 22, 2011, relating to our audits of the consolidated financial statements, financial statement schedule and internal control over financial reporting, which appear in SRS Labs, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

 

 
| /s/   SQUAR, MILNER, PETERSON, MIRANDA & WILLIAMSON, LLP |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                                                   |   |   |
| Newport   Beach, California                                            |   |   |
| February 22,   2011                                               |   |   |

 

----
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2021024EN.01003001.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 22.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/30 |

---

Information from the Commission pursuant to Council Decision (EU) 2020/1421

(2021/C 24/13)

Pursuant to Article 3 of Council Decision (EU) 2020/1421 of 1 October 2020 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union as regards amendments to the Annexes to the European Agreement concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road (ADR) and to the Regulations annexed to the European Agreement concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Inland Waterways (ADN) [(1)](#ntr1-C_2021024EN.01003001-E0001), the Commission informs that the decisions taken at the respective bodies are available at:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/CN/2020/CN.438.2020-Eng.pdf |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/CN/2020/CN.461.2020-Eng.pdf and |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/CN/2020/CN.546.2020-Eng.pdf |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2021024EN.01003001-E0001)  [OJ L 329, 9.10.2020, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2020_329_R_TOC).

---
#### NATIONAL BANK OF KINDERHOOK v. FARRAR et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

December 2, 1896.)

Action by the National Bank of Kinderhook against Alonzo H. Farrar and others.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.
#### STANTON, Respondent, v. PASSAIC ROLLiNG-MILL CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

November 20, 1896.)

Action by John E. Stanton against the Passaic Rolling-Mill Company.

No opinion. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Skip to main content

Privacy Policy•Site map

# Opt Out of Electronic Filing Notifications

An attorney who is removed as the attorney of record in a pending case—and who thus no longer wishes to receive electronic notifications in that case—may elect to stop receiving such notifications by modifying his/her CM/ECF settings. To opt out of electronic filing notifications, please take the following steps:

1. Log in to CM/ECF.

2. Under the **Utilities** menu, select **Maintain User Account**.

3. Select **Email Information.**

4. Select the e-mail address at which you receive electronic notifications.

5. Under **Case-specific options**, select the relevant case(s) and then select **Remove selected cases**.

Howard T. Markey National Courts Building • 717 Madison Place, NW, Washington, DC 20439 • 202-357-6400
EXHIBIT 32

Certification

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section
1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of FiberNet Telecom Group, Inc., (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |                              
|------------------ |  | -----------------------------
|Date: May 15, 2007 |  | /s/ Jon A. DeLuca            
|                   |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                   | 
|Date: May 15, 2007 |  | /s/ Charles S. Wiesenhart Jr.
|                   |  | Chief Financial Officer      

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2021003EN.01000501.xml

| 6.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 3/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 3/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9907 — Exclusive Networks/Veracomp Business)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 3/05)

On 26 November 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9907. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9907. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### Jeremy Jerome SMILEY, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. R.L. MARTINEZ and Kane, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 10-15309.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 28, 2011.

Jeremy Jerome Smiley, Soledad, CA, pro se.

Emily L. Brinkman, Deputy Attorney General, AGCA — Office of the California Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants-Appéllees.

*689Before: FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jeremy Jerome Smiley, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal for failure to exhaust, and for clear error its factual determinations. *Wyatt v. Terhune,*315 F.3d 1108, 1117 (9th Cir.2003). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Smiley’s action because he failed to exhaust administrative remedies or demonstrate that no pertinent relief was available to him through the prison’s internal process. *See Woodford v. Ngo,*548 U.S. 81, 85, 93-95, 126 S.Ct. 2378, 165 L.Ed.2d 368 (2006) (“proper exhaustion” is mandatory and requires adherence to administrative procedural rules); *cf. Marella v. Terhune,*568 F.3d 1024, 1027 (9th Cir.2009) (per curiam) (administrative appeals process was unavailable to inmate who had no ground to dispute the screen-out of his appeal).

Smiley’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

Smiley’s motion for appointment of counsel on appeal, attached to his opening brief, is denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Office of the Secretary

                    Notice is hereby given that I have delegated to the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation all authorities under Section 2108(c) of Title XXI of the Social Security Act, titled “Federal Evaluation of State Children's Health Insurance Program,” as amended hereafter. These authorities shall be implemented in consultation with the Health Care Financing Administration, the Health Resources and Services                           ( print page 20466)                        Administration, and other relevant components within the Department.                

These delegations shall be exercised under the Department's existing delegation of authority and policy on regulations. In addition, I hereby affirm and ratify any actions taken by you or your subordinates that involved the exercise of the authorities delegated herein prior to the effective date of this delegation.

This delegation is effective immediately.

Donna E. Shalala,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-9420  Filed 4-14-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-04-M
#### HUTKOFF, Respondent, v. ELTING, Appellant.

(City Court of New York, General Term.

October 30, 1896.)

Action by Nathan Hutkoff against Samuel Biting.

P. Wilcox, for appellant.

Leventritt & Nathan, for respondent.

SOHUCHMAN, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon the verdict of a jury in favor of plaintiff, and from an order denying defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict, and for a new trial. The complaint alleges a cause of action for $270 for goods sold and delivered by the plaintiff to the defendant. The answer denies each and every allegation of the complaint. On the trial the plaintiff proved that the goods were sold to the defendant, that credit was given to him, and that he directed the goods to be delivered to the firm of L. Biting & Son, Kingston, N. Y. The defendant, however, proved that the goods were sold and delivered to the firm of L. Biting & Son, in Kingston, N. Y.: that the defendant was not a partner of said firm; that he went along with his brother to the place of business when his brother bought said goods for said firm. The contention thus raised on the trial by the respective parties to this action was squarely and properly submitted to the jury; the trial judge instructing the jury: “The question is, to whom was the credit given, and who agreed to accept the liability-'’’ The jury found in favor of the plaintiff. It is convincing that (hey gave credit to the testimony adduced by (he plaintiff, and that testimony is insufficient to sustain the verdict. We cannot interfere therewith on this appeal. Judgment affirmed, with costs. VAN WYCK, J., concurs.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       SECTION 906 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the Quarterly Report of Emeritus Corporation, a Washington
corporation  (the  "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003,
as  filed  with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Form  10-Q"), I, Raymond R. Brandstrom, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:


1.     The  Form  10-Q  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

2.     The  information  contained  in  the  Form  10-Q  fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.




                                             /s/    Raymond  R.  Brandstrom
                                            -------------------------------
                                            Raymond  R.  Brandstrom
                                            Chief  Financial  Officer
                                            August  8,  2003


A  signed  original  of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears  in  typed  form within the electronic version of this written statement
required  by  Section 906, has been provided to Emeritus Corporation and will be
retained  by  Emeritus  Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.
# C_2021279EN.01001101.xml

| 13.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 279/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/11

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10340 — Goldman Sachs/Adapteo)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 279/05)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Goldman Sachs Group, Inc (‘Goldman Sachs’, USA), |
| --- | --- |

—

Goldman Sachs Group, Inc (‘Goldman Sachs’, USA),

| — | Adapteo Plc (‘Adapteo’, Finland). |
| --- | --- |

—

Adapteo Plc (‘Adapteo’, Finland).

Goldman Sachs acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Adapteo. The concentration is accomplished by way of public bid announced on 17 May 2021.

2.

| — | for Goldman Sachs: global investment banking, securities and investment management. It provides a range of banking, securities and investment services worldwide; |
| --- | --- |

—

for Goldman Sachs: global investment banking, securities and investment management. It provides a range of banking, securities and investment services worldwide;

| — | for Adapteo: modular space provider in Northern Europe, which builds, rents and sells temporary and permanent pre-fabricated modular building units for schools, day-care centres, elderly care homes, offices, temporary accommodation and events, as well as for customers within the governmental and healthcare sectors. |
| --- | --- |

—

for Adapteo: modular space provider in Northern Europe, which builds, rents and sells temporary and permanent pre-fabricated modular building units for schools, day-care centres, elderly care homes, offices, temporary accommodation and events, as well as for customers within the governmental and healthcare sectors.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10340 — Goldman Sachs/Adapteo

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +3222964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

JESSICA ALYSE MORENO , Appellant ,

v.
ZAPP CREDIT SOLUTIONS OF SAN ANTONIO, LLC, and RUBEN VICTOR JUAREZ, JR. , Appellee s
. § § § § § No. 08

- 23

- 00 288

- CV Appeal from the

t he 57th District Court

o f Bexar County, Texas

(TC# 2022

- CI

- 24860 )

MEMORANDUM OPINION This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether it should be dismissed for want of prosecution

. 1 See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3

. We find that Appellant has yet to file an appellant’s brief. Appellant filed a notice of an
accelerated appeal on September 29, 2023. The Bexar County District Clerk filed a notice of late
record on October 10, 2023 . Following the grant of extensions, t he clerk’s record was filed on
October 20, 2023 , while the reporter’s record was filed on October 23, 2023 . Accordingly ,

1 This case was transferred from the Fourth Court of Appeals pursuant to a docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN

. § 73.001 . We follow the precedent of the Fourth Court of Appeals to the extent it might conflict with our own. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 41.3

.2 A ppellant’s brief was originally due on November 12 , 2023. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6 (a)( 1) (stating
that in an accelerated appeal, an appellant must file a brief within 20 days after the later of the date
the clerk’s record or reporter’s record is filed). Nevertheless, on November 10, 2023, Appellant
thereafter filed , and this Court granted, a f irst motion for extension of time for Appellant ’s brief , thereby extending th e briefing deadline to November 27 , 2023.
On December 7 , 2023, the Clerk of this Court sent a letter to Appellant , via her email address, notifying her it appeared that she no longer wished to pursue this appeal , as neither an appellant’s brief nor a motion for leave to file a late brief had yet been filed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 38.8 . The letter indicated the Court w ould submit this case for dismissal after t en days had passed unless any party could show grounds for continuing the appeal. O n December 22, 2023, after no response had been received , the Clerk of this Court sent a second notice repeating the same
information , but this time the notice was sent via U.S. Mail . As before, the letter gave notice of our intent to dismiss for want of prosecution unless grounds for continuing the appeal were provided. As of this date, more than ten days have passed from the Court’s latest notice , and Ap pellant has yet to file either an appellant’s brief or a motion for leave to file a late brief. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.

GINA M. PALAFOX , Justice January 8 , 202 4
Before Alley , C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.