alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2009282EN.01000101.xml

| 29.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 282/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 282/1

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1018/2009

of 28 October 2009

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in particular Article 138(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 29 October 2009.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 October 2009.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.

2

---

ANNEX

Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

| (EUR/100 kg) |
| --- |
| CN code | Third country code (1) | Standard import value |
| 0702 00 00 | MA | 35,7 |
| MK | 23,3 |
| TR | 57,4 |
| ZZ | 38,8 |
| 0707 00 05 | TR | 128,1 |
| ZZ | 128,1 |
| 0709 90 70 | MA | 78,2 |
| TR | 113,5 |
| ZZ | 95,9 |
| 0805 50 10 | AR | 77,6 |
| TR | 72,8 |
| ZA | 82,2 |
| ZZ | 77,5 |
| 0806 10 10 | BR | 198,8 |
| EG | 89,1 |
| TR | 117,8 |
| US | 238,2 |
| ZZ | 161,0 |
| 0808 10 80 | AU | 182,8 |
| CA | 74,5 |
| CL | 114,8 |
| NZ | 90,0 |
| TR | 91,6 |
| US | 116,2 |
| ZA | 70,9 |
| ZZ | 105,8 |
| 0808 20 50 | CN | 64,7 |
| ZZ | 64,7 |

(EUR/100 kg)

CN code

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

0702 00 00

MA

35,7

MK

23,3

TR

57,4

ZZ

38,8

0707 00 05

TR

128,1

ZZ

128,1

0709 90 70

MA

78,2

TR

113,5

ZZ

95,9

0805 50 10

AR

77,6

TR

72,8

ZA

82,2

ZZ

77,5

0806 10 10

BR

198,8

EG

89,1

TR

117,8

US

238,2

ZZ

161,0

0808 10 80

AU

182,8

CA

74,5

CL

114,8

NZ

90,0

TR

91,6

US

116,2

ZA

70,9

ZZ

105,8

0808 20 50

CN

64,7

ZZ

64,7

---

(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
  ZZ
  ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-40879 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JESUS GARCIA, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-01-CR-152-1

-------------------- June 21, 2002 Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jesus Garcia, Jr., appeals from his conviction and sentence following his guilty plea to possession with intent to distribute marijuana. He argues that (1) the district court reversibly erred in failing to rule on his motion for downward departure, as required by F ED . R. C RIM . P. 32(c)(1); (2) the district court committed plain error when it found that his prior narcotics convictions were “controlled substances offenses” which triggeredNo. 01-40879 -2- the career offender sentencing enhancement; and (3) 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)&(b) is facially unconstitutional. At sentencing, the district court addressed Garcia’s argument regarding the confidential informant, which was raised in connection only with his motion for downward departure based on exceptional circumstances, and granted a downward departure on other grounds. We find that implicit in the judgment and in the district court’s reasons for judgment was its determination that Garcia’s recruitment by a confidential informant was not an exceptional circumstance which warranted an additional downward departure. See, e.g., United States v. McCormick , 54 F.3d 214, 220-21 (5th Cir. 1995). Therefore, if the motion for downward departure constituted a “matter controverted” within the meaning of F ED . R. C RIM . P. 32(c)(1), it was resolved by the district
court. We further hold that it was not plainly erroneous for the district court to find that Garcia’s state narcotics convictions were “controlled substance offenses.” First, the convictions were facially consistent with the definition of a “controlled substance offense.” See U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(b); cf. United States v. Herrera-Solorzano , 114 F.3d. 48, 50 (5th Cir. 1997). Second, Garcia did not object on that basis or provide any evidence in rebuttal; therefore, the Government was not required to present proof beyond the presentence report that these convictions satisfied U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(b), and the district court wasNo. 01-40879 -3- entitled to rely on the presentence report. See United States v.
Huerta , 182 F.3d 361, 364 (5th Cir. 1999). Finally, Garcia correctly concedes that the issue whether 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)&(b) is facially unconstitutional is foreclosed by United States v. Slaugther , 238 F.3d 580, 582 (2000), cert. denied , 532 U.S. 1045 (2001). He raises the issue only to preserve it for further review. This court is bound by its precedent absent an intervening Supreme Court decision or a subsequent en banc decision. See United States v. Short , 181 F.3d 620, 624 (5th Cir. 1999).
AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 23.3



                       Consent of Independent Auditors



The Board of Directors
Trigon Healthcare, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-22463) on Form S-8 of Trigon Healthcare, Inc. of our report dated April 23,
1999, relating to the statements of financial condition, with fund information,
of the Trigon Insurance Company 401(k) Restoration Plan as of December 31, 1998
and 1997, and the related statements of income and changes in plan equity, with
fund information, for each of the years in the three-year period ended December
31, 1998, which report is included in this Form 10-K/A No. 1 of Trigon
Healthcare, Inc.


/s/ KPMG LLP

Richmond, Virginia
April 29, 1999
# C_2021071EN.01005601.xml

| 1.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/56

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9802 — Liberty Global/DPG Media/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 71/03)

On 12 August 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9802. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9802. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 0 E0 03 8 . J ENNI E CASADAY v

. NI ALL J OHNSTON.

Up o n co n s id erat i o n o f th e APPELLAN T ’S Th i rd M ot i o n t o E x t en d Ti m e to
Fi l e Ap p l i cat i o n fo r Di s cret i o n ary A p p eal i n t h e ab o v e s t y l ed cas e, i t i s o rd ered t h at

t h e m o t i o n i s h ereb y GRANTED, wh i ch wi l l ex t en d t h e d ue d at e un t i l Ap ri l 1 5
, 2 0 2 0.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i t n e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 

## March 16, 2020

03/16/2020
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 225 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 225

  To amend the Consumer Product Safety Act to remove the exclusion of 
pistols, revolvers, and other firearms from the definition of consumer 
 product in order to permit the issuance of safety standards for such 
          articles by the Consumer Product Safety Commission.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 8, 2015

Ms. Kelly of Illinois introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Consumer Product Safety Act to remove the exclusion of 
pistols, revolvers, and other firearms from the definition of consumer 
 product in order to permit the issuance of safety standards for such 
          articles by the Consumer Product Safety Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Firearm Safety Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF EXCLUSION OF FIREARMS FROM THE DEFINITION OF 
              CONSUMER PRODUCT.

    Section 3(a)(5) of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 
2052(a)(5)) is amended by striking subparagraph (E) and redesignating 
subparagraphs (F) through (I) as subparagraphs (E) through (H), 
respectively.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT23.2**

 

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-85808),the Registration statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-75792), and theRegistration statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-75788) ofPrecis, Inc. of our report dated April 11, 2005, relating to theconsolidated financial statements which appear in this Form 10-K.

 
| **/s/ BDO Seidman LLP** |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |
| Dallas, Texas           |
| April 15, 2005          |

 

----
<PAGE>   1



(21)     SUBSIDIARIES


                                           EXHIBIT 21
                                          Subsidiaries
                                          ------------

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Name                                          Jurisdiction        Trade Name of Organization
---------------------------------------  ---------------------    ---------------------------------

<S>                                         <C>                   <C>
Patient Infosystems Acquisition Corp.           Delaware          HealthDesk

PATI Acquisition Corp.                          Delaware          PATI Acquisition Corp.

Patient Infosystems Canada, Inc.            Ontario, Canada       Patient Infosystems Canada, Inc.
</TABLE>



All other exhibits are omitted because they are not applicable or the required
information is shown elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
#### Sound Shore Medical Center of Westchester, Appellant, v Romelle Maloney, Respondent.

[947 NYS2d 317]

In an action to recover on three promissory notes, commenced by motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint pursuant to CPLR 3213, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Smith, J.), entered April 29, 2011, which denied its motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

“To establish prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law with respect to a promissory note, a plaintiff must show the existence of a promissory note, executed by the defendant, containing an unequivocal and unconditional obligation to repay, and the failure by the defendant to pay in accordance with the note’s terms” *(Lugli v Johnston,*78 AD3d 1133, 1135 [2010], citing *Gullery v Imburgio,*74 AD3d 1022, 1022 [2010]). Once the plaintiff submits evidence establishing these elements, the burden then shifts to the defendant to submit evidence establishing the existence of a triable issue with respect to a bona fide defense *(see Jin Sheng He v Sing Huei Chang,*83 AD3d 788, 789 [2011]).

The plaintiff established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting the subject promissory *824notes, which were signed by the defendant and which contained an unequivocal and unconditional obligation to repay, and by showing that the defendant failed to pay in accordance with the notes’ terms. However, in opposition to the plaintiffs’ prima facie showing, the defendant raised triable issues of fact, inter alia, as to whether any money tendered to her by the plaintiff was, in fact, a loan, whether her alleged promise to repay should properly be deemed to constitute a note, and how much was actually owed on the note *(see Agai v Diontech Consulting, Inc.,*64 AD3d 622, 623 [2009]; *Khoury v Khoury,*280 AD2d 453 [2001]).

In light of our determination, we need not address the defendant’s remaining contention. Dillon, J.P., Eng, Austin and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ronald LaFrance, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and defendant’s sentence of probation reinstated. Memorandum: The judgment entered upon defendant’s plea of guilty of a violation of probation must be reversed. When a court pronounces a sentence of probation, it must specify as part of the sentence the conditions of probation (CPL 410.10). At any time prior to the expiration or termination of the period of probation, the court may modify or enlarge the conditions of the sentence (CPL 410.20, 410.50). Defendant must, however, be personally present when such action is taken unless the modification consists solely of the elimination or relaxation of one or more conditions (CPL 410.20 [1]). Here, defendant was not present when the conditions of his sentence of probation were amended to include the complete abstention from the consumption of alcohol. A conviction for a violation of a condition of probation thus unlawfully imposed cannot stand. (Appeal from judgment of Genesee County Court, Morton, J.—violation of probation.) Present— Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Boomer, Pine and Lawton, JJ.
| 1. | I      have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended      December 31, 2008 of Sun Bancorp,Inc.; |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this      report; |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

| Date:  April      29, 2009 |        /s/  Thomas X. Geisel     |
|--------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|                                 | Thomas      X. Geisel                      |
|                                 | President      and Chief Executive Officer |

----

| 1. | I      have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended      December 31, 2008 of Sun Bancorp,Inc.; |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this      report; |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  April      29, 2009 |        /s/  Dan A. Chila                       |
|--------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 | Dan      A. Chila                                        |
|                                 | Executive      Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer |

----
# C_2022443EN.01014501.xml

| 22.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 443/145 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 443/145

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive (EU) 2018/2001 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources, Directive 2010/31/EU on the energy performance of buildings and Directive 2012/27/EU on energy efficiency

(COM(2022) 222 final)

(2022/C 443/22)

| Referral | European Parliament, 6.6.2022
  Council of the European Union, 15.6.2022 |
| --- | --- |
| Legal basis | Article 91 and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union |
| Section responsible | Transport, Energy, Infrastructure and the Information Society |
| Adopted at plenary | 13.7.2022 |
| Plenary session No | 571 |
| Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions) | 201/2/1 |

Referral

European Parliament, 6.6.2022

Council of the European Union, 15.6.2022

Legal basis

Article 91 and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Section responsible

Transport, Energy, Infrastructure and the Information Society

Adopted at plenary

13.7.2022

Plenary session No

571

Outcome of vote

(for/against/abstentions)

201/2/1

Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 13 July 2022.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Christa SCHWENG

---
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**








**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**





I,
      Michael Lewis, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
      of
      eLinear, Inc. on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarterly period ended September 30,
      2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form
      10-QSB/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
      results of operations of eLinear, Inc.





Date:
      June 2, 2006











By:
      _/s/  Michael Lewis_______


Michael
      Lewis


Chief
      Executive Officer
# C_2021463EN.01001301.xml

| 16.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 463/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 463/13

---

Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)

(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1))

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 463/12)

Decision granting an authorisation

| Reference of the decision (2) | Date of decision | Substance name | Holder of the authorisation | Authorisation number | Authorised use | Date of expiry of review period | Reasons for the decision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| C(2021) 7875 | 9 November 2021 | 4-(1,1,3,3-Tetra methylbutyl)phenol, ethoxylated (4-tert-OPnEO) EC No: -, CAS No:- | Nuova Ompi S.r.l. Unipersonale, Via Molinella 17, 35017 Piombino Dese (PD), Italy | REACH/21/8/0 | As emulsifier in the siliconisation of glass containers used as primary packaging for one specific medicinal product NeoRecormon® of one pharmaceutical company | 4 January 2026 | In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies. |

Reference of the decision (2)

Date of decision

Substance name

Holder of the authorisation

Authorisation number

Authorised use

Date of expiry of review period

Reasons for the decision

C(2021) 7875

9 November 2021

4-(1,1,3,3-Tetra methylbutyl)phenol, ethoxylated (4-tert-OPnEO) EC No: -, CAS No:-

Nuova Ompi S.r.l. Unipersonale, Via Molinella 17, 35017 Piombino Dese (PD), Italy

REACH/21/8/0

As emulsifier in the siliconisation of glass containers used as primary packaging for one specific medicinal product NeoRecormon® of one pharmaceutical company

4 January 2026

In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies.

---

(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006 , p. 1.

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: Authorisation (europa.eu)

---