alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Visit us on the web at www.uscg.mil/band.

What the Critics Are Writing 

About The U.S. Coast Guard Band 

“...it’s a virtuoso band. Its ensemble playing is as near perfect in every detail as its soloists are first 

class...” 

—NIAGARA GAZETTE, Niagara Falls, N.Y. 

“...the level of technical and artistic attainment was about as near perfection as most musical bodies are 

going to get. In short, it was matchless...” 

—THE POST BULLETIN, Rochester, Minn. 

“...the large crowd knew that they were going to be in for a treat, and the sustained applause following 

each number was testimony to the fact that the band did not let them down...” 

—THE WORCESTER TELEGRAM, Worcester, Mass. 

“...the U.S. Coast Guard Band brought down the house Wednesday for a capacity crowd at the Tennessee 

Theater...” 

—THE KNOXVILLE NEWS-SENTINEL, Knoxville, Tenn. 

“...this is indeed a superb band, which presents a well-rounded program containing something for all. Its 

concerts are family affairs, enjoyed hugely by music lovers of all ages...” 

—CHRONICLE-TELEGRAM, Elyria, Ohio

“...a grand and social evening. Governor Garrahy was on hand to call it ‘one of the outstanding events of 

the year in the whole state’...” 

—THE PROVIDENCE JOURNAL, Providence, R.I.

“...what a great privilege it was to see some of the best musicians in the nation, in a free, live 

performance...” 

—THE NEWS, Frederick, Md. 

“By now I should just come to expect the remarkable level of musical excellence from the band and not 

marvel at it; but I am simply floored at how deeply you got to the heart of so many pieces ... This is music 

making at the highest level, and I am honored that NPR was privileged to distribute it." 

—Andy Trudeau, Director 

National Public Radio Cultural Programming, Washington, D.C.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Mary Moody, Deceased. Kenneth A. Markwalter, Respondent; Morris B. Kessler, Appellant.

— In an accounting proceeding, the appeal is from *674an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens County (Laurino, S.), dated December 11, 1985, which, *inter alia,*fixed an attorney’s fee at $1,200 and held that the conveyance of a certain parcel of real property was not commissionable.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

No commissions are payable on real property unless the fiduciary sells the property *(Matter of Schaich,*55 AD2d 914; SCPA 2307 [2]; Lipman, 1967 Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 58A, SCPA 2307, p 363). The sale of the real property by the appellant was not done in his capacity of executor. Rather, he sold it to a named individual at a fixed price pursuant to the instruction and direction of the respondent residuary legatee. Such transfer by executor’s deed rather than by deed of the respondent was a mere incident of the conveyance. The transaction should be treated as if the real property passed to the respondent by operation of law and the appellant fiduciary never received the asset. Hence, the sale was not commissionable.

Finally, the Surrogate did not act improperly in reducing the counsel fee from $1,500 to $1,200. Mangano, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

349 CA 11-01572 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

M&T REAL ESTATE TRUST, SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO M&T REAL ESTATE, INC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V ORDER

JAMES J. DOYLE, II, AND JIM DOYLE FORD, INC., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. (APPEAL NO. 1.)

GROSS, SHUMAN, BRIZDLE & GILFILLAN, P.C., BUFFALO (JOHN K. ROTTARIS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

JAECKLE FLEISCHMANN & MUGEL, LLP, BUFFALO (HOWARD S. ROSENHOCH OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Michael L. D’Amico, A.J.), entered June 29, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to RPAPL article 13. The order, among other things, granted plaintiff’s motion for leave to enter a deficiency judgment against defendants.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs ( see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy , 140 AD2d 988; Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts & Roberts , 63 AD2d 566, 567; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

Entered: March 23, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
### NUMBER 13

- 13

- 00 287

- CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

PAULO TREVINO A/K/A PAUL TREVINO

A/K/A PANCHO TREVINO

, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the 148th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodrig uez , Benavides, and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Paulo Trevino a/k/a Paul Trevino a/k/a Pancho Trevino , by and through

his attorney, has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal because he no longer desires to

prosecute it. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we

grant the motion to dismiss pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and2

dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for

reheari ng will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed the

8th day of August, 2013

.
#### PORTER et al., Respondents, v. DUCEY LUMBER CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

December 2, 1896.)

Action by Hiram P. Porter and others against the Ducey Lumber Company.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 74 (Monday, April 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 20459]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9453]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. 225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than May 1, 2000.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (D. Michael Manies, 
Assistant Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 
64198-0001:
    1. Richard Dean Goppert, as Trustee of the Revocable Inter Vivos 
Trust Agreement of Richard D. Goppert, Kansas City, Missouri; to 
acquire voting shares of Kansas Agencies & Investments, Inc., Overland 
Park, Kansas, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Garnett 
State Savings Bank, Garnett, Kansas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 11, 
2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-9453 Filed 4-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Order issued October , 2012

In The

(!uitrt uf Aipia1s

ifth 1itrirt uf iIixa at 1aI1a

No. 05-1 2-00663-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.V. AND SN., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 303rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-04-1 1968-V

ORDER

The Court has before it court reporter Donna Kindle’s September 26, 2012 motion for

reconsideration oforder granting appellant’s motion to challenge order sustaining contest. The Court

DENIES the motion. See TEx. R. App. P. 20.1(j).

/7 ,/fr/f

TABTH LANG-MIERS’

JUsTIE
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00154-CV

Elma Thomas

v.

Peters Colony

§

§

§

§

From County Court at Law No. 2

of Denton County (CV-2015-00793)

January 14, 2015

Per Curiam

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismiss for want 

of prosecution.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
IN THE SUPREME COUkT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

IN RE 1998 RULES FOR ADMISSION TO THE BAR ORDER F MONTANA This Court has determined that it is necessary to amend Section IV of the 1998 Rules for Admission to the State Bar of Montana to require the use of an application form from the State Bar of Montana for attorney applicants who desire to appearpro hat vice in a court of this state. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that effective afla+~ /$3 , 1999,SectionIVofthe 1998 Rules for Admission to the State Bar of Montana is a ended as follows:

Montana. The apolication form will reauire that the applicant orovide the following information: 1 .

. . .

.

the State Bar of Montana. The anolication will then be reviewed bv the State Bar of Montana which shall certifv the number of mior annearances the applicant has been granted under Section IV-C and whether or not the applicant has provided the requisite information. Uoon certification, the State Bar shall forward the application and to the appropriate court. The court shall enter an order mantine or refusing the annlication and. if the aonlicant is refused. the court shall state its reasons. A CODY of the court’s order shall be mailed to the annlicant.

counsel of record and the State Bar of Montana. The State Bar of Montana shall maintain a record of all DYO hnc vice aoalications as a oublic record. Attomevs aunearing uro hnc vice shall notifv the State Bar of Montana uuon conclusion of the matter in which the attornev auueared.E.
.

F.
.

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to the State Bar of Montana to the Administrator of the Board of Bar Examiners; to all members of the commission on Admission Rules Revision; to West Group; to the Code Commissioner and Director of Legal Services at the Montana Legislative Services Division; to each of the Clerks of the District Courts of Montana; and to Sally Hilander at The Montana Lawyer magazine with the request that this Order be publishe DATED this /B 2 :d in the next possible issue.

$of ?ik
Chief Justice
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Blount International, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Joshua L. Collins, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(i)            The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(ii)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periodsexpressed in the report.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Blount International, Inc. and will be retained by BlountInternational, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

 

 

Date:November 9, 2010

 

 
| /s/  Joshua L. Collins   |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Joshua  L. Collins       |   |
| President  and           |   |
| Chief  Executive Officer |   |

 

----
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

June 23, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 136288 Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 136288 

 COA: 276153 

Macomb CC: 2005-004731-FC 

ANTONIO PEREZ-CHICA,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 25, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0616 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 23, 2008 

 Clerk
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, James S. Osterman, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qfor the period ended September 30, 2005 of Blount International, Inc.;

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this quarterly reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this quarterly report;

 

4.             The registrant’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and we have:

 

(a) designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors:

 

(a) all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b) any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls.

 

Date: November 4, 2005

 

 
| /s/ James S. Osterman     |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| James S. Osterman         |
| Chairman of the Board and |
| Chief Executive Officer   |

 

----
<PAGE>


                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.2


                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                           JUNO ONLINE SERVICES, INC.


            Juno Online Services, Inc. (the "Corporation"), a corporation
organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the
State of Delaware,

            DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

            FIRST: That Article FOURTH, Paragraph A of the Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation, stating the total number of
shares the Corporation is authorized to issue, is hereby amended to include the
following paragraph:

            Each 4.5 shares of the Corporation's common stock, par value $.01
      per share (the "Common Stock"), and each 4.5 shares of the Corporation's
      capital stock convertible into such Common Stock, issued and outstanding
      at 6:00 P.M. on May 25, 1999 shall be converted and reclassified
      automatically effective as of the date hereof into 1 share of the
      Corporation's Common Stock, so that each share of the Corporation's Common
      Stock, and each share of the Corporation's capital stock convertible into
      such Common Stock, issued and outstanding is hereby converted and
      reclassified. No fractional interests resulting from such conversion shall
      be issued but, in lieu thereof, the Corporation will round the number of
      shares of the Corporation's Common Stock issuable to each holder up to the
      next whole number of shares of Common Stock.

            As a result of the foregoing, the total number of shares which the
      Corporation is authorized to issue is One Hundred Thirty-Eight Million
      Three Hundred Thirty-Three Thousand Three Hundred and Thirty-Four
      (138,333,334). One Hundred Thirty-Three Million Three Hundred Thirty-Three
      Thousand Three Hundred and Thirty-Four (133,333,334) shall be Common Stock
      and Five Million (5,000,000) shall be Preferred Stock.

            SECOND: That pursuant to the resolution of the Board of Directors, a
written consent approving the proposed amendment to the Certificate of
Incorporation was duly signed by a majority of the stockholders of the
Corporation in accordance with Section 228 of the General Corporation Law of the
State of Delaware.

            THIRD: That the foregoing amendment has been duly adopted in
accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the DGCL.

<PAGE>

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this certificate
on June 1, 1999.

                                    Juno Online Services, Inc.


                                    By:  /s/ Charles Ardai
                                        --------------------------
                                        Charles Ardai
                                        Chief Executive Officer and President


Attest:


By:   /s/ Richard Buchband
   ---------------------------
Richard Buchband, Secretary



                                        2
Listen

# Voting Rights in Florida Following Recent Amendments to the Election Code

September 28, 2023

The Florida Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights submits this report regarding recent changes to Florida’s election code and related civil rights impacts. Specifically, the Committee sought to examine the extent to which recent changes to the state election code may have a disproportionate and/or discriminatory impact on voting rights based on race, color, or national origin.

Report

Policy Brief

Press Release

Florida

-  All Reports 
-  Annual Statutory Enforcement 
-  Briefing Reports 
-  Advisory Committees Reports 
-  Budget and Performance 
-  FOIA Reports 
-  Data Inventory Program 
-  Civil Rights Complaints 
-  Historical Publications 
-  Archives
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 182 (Thursday, September 23, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52915-52916]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-20580]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of meetings of the Board of Scientific 
Counselors, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.
    The meetings will be closed to the public as indicated below in 
accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of 
individual intramural programs and projects conducted by the NATIONAL 
INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE, including consideration 
of personnel qualifications and performance, and the competence of 
individual investigators, the disclosure of which would constitute a 
clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Board of Scientific Counselors, National 
Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.

[[Page 52916]]

    Date: October 24-26, 2021.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate personnel qualifications and 
performance, and competence of individual investigators.
    Place: Porter Neuroscience Research Center, Building 35A, 35 
Convent Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Nina F. Schor, MD, Ph.D., Deputy Director, 
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, 
Building 31, Room 8A52, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-9746, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9ef0f7f0ffb0edfdf6f1ecdef0f7f6b0f9f1e8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="523c3b3c337c21313a3d20123c3b3a7c353d24">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 17, 2021.
Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-20580 Filed 9-22-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pyramid Breweries Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jason
W. Rees, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxlEY Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ JASON W. REES

Jason W. Rees
Chief Accounting Officer
August 14, 2003


                                       24
#### F. E. TEVES COAL CO., Respondent, v. NEFF et al., Assessors, Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 30, 1896.)

Application of the F. E. Teves Goal Company for a writ of certiorari to B. G. Neff, Henry Bristow, and others, assessors of the city of Brooklyn.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with §10 costs and disbursements. All concur.