alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2022271EN.01000301.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 14.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 271/3 |

---

OPINION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

of 4 July 2022

on the Proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 974/98 as regards the introduction of the euro in Croatia and on the Proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 2866/98 as regards the conversion rate to the euro for Croatia

(CON/2022/24)

(2022/C 271/03)

Introduction and legal basis

On 3 June 2022 the European Central Bank (ECB) received a request from the Council of the European Union for an opinion on the Proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 974/98 as regards the introduction of the euro in Croatia [(1)](#ntr1-C_2022271EN.01000301-E0001). On 1 July 2022 the ECB received a request from the Council of the European Union for an opinion on the Proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 2866/98 as regards the conversion rate to the euro for Croatia [(2)](#ntr2-C_2022271EN.01000301-E0002).

The ECB’s competence to deliver an opinion is based on Article 140(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. In accordance with the first sentence of Article 17.5 of the Rules of Procedure of the European Central Bank, the Governing Council has adopted this opinion.

Observations

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 1. | The proposed regulations will enable the introduction of the euro as the currency of Croatia following the abrogation of Croatia’s derogation in accordance with the procedure set out in Article 140(2) of the Treaty. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 2. | The ECB welcomes the proposed regulations. |

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 4 July 2022.

The President of the ECB

Christine LAGARDE

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2022271EN.01000301-E0001)  COM(2022) 281 final.

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2022271EN.01000301-E0002)  COM(2022) 319 final.

---
#### East End Owners Corp. v Roc-East End Associates.

Motion for reargument denied, and *sua sponte*the appellant is granted leave, to appeal to the Court of Appeals as indicated. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Asch, Rosenberger and Smith, JJ.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Michael Anthony Danna v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-19-00416-CR

Trial court case number: 2155287

Trial court: County Criminal Court at Law No. 3 of Harris County

Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file his brief is granted. Appellant’s brief is 

due April 24, 2020. No further extensions will be granted.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ___________/s/ Julie Countiss______________

Acting individually

Date: March 17, 2020
CONSENT ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

On or about March3l,2O23, the parties in this case submitted a Motion for Approval of

Settlement Agreement and Entry ofConsent Order to be approved as a settlement ofthe case

under 33 C.F.R. $ 20.502.

I have carefully reviewed the terms of the Settlement Agreement and find it is fair and

reasonable and in substantial compliance with the requirements of33 C.F.R. $ 20.502.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the record, it is hereby ORDERED, the Settlement Agreement is

APPROVED in full and incorporated herein by reference. This Consent Order shall constitute

full, final, and complete adjudication of this proceeding.

Done and dated April 4,2023, at

Alameda, California

Timothy G. Stueve

Administrative Law Judge

U.S. Coast Guard
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to
the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements and (Form S-8 No. 333-31751, 333-67265, 333-62618, 333-107462 and 333-118041) pertaining to various NMT Medical, Inc. employee stock purchase plans and stock option plans of our reports
dated March 9, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of NMT Medical, Inc. NMT Medical Inc.s managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of NMT Medical, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) of NMT Medical, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005.



/S/    ERNST & YOUNG LLPErnst & Young LLP


Boston, Massachusetts

March 9, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 74 (Monday, April 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 20474]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9433]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: April 14, 2000.
    Time: 12:00 PM to 2:00 PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: 6001 Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Alan L. Willard, Phd, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, NINDS/NIH/DHHS, 
Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd, Suite 3208, MSC 9529, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-9529, 301-496-9223.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding 
cycle.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: May 24, 2000.
    Time: 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Holiday Inn Town Center, 8727 Colesville Road, Silver 
Spring, MD 20910.
    Contact Person: Katherine Woodbury, Phd, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, NINDS/NIH/DHHS, 
Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd, Suite 3208, MSC 9529, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-9529, 301-496-9223.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 6, 2000.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-9433 Filed 4-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### Jie Li et al., Appellants, v Triboro Coach Corporation et al., Respondents.

[946 NYS2d 887]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens *1014County (Orlikoff-Flug, J.), entered March 29, 2010, which, upon a jury verdict finding that the plaintiff Jie Li did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), is in favor of the defendants and against them dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contentions on appeal, the jury’s finding that the plaintiff Jie Li did not sustain a serious injury under the fracture or the 90/180-day category of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident was not contrary to the weight of the evidence *(see Lolik v Big V Supermarkets,*86 NY2d 744 [1995]; *Nicastro v Park,*113 AD2d 129 [1985]).

The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are without merit. Rivera, J.P., Eng, Lott and Cohen, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Leo Paul R. Bergeron, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

— Order unanimously affirmed (same mem as in *People v Bergeron*[Appeal No. 1] 125 AD2d 927 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from order of Ontario County Court, Henry, J. — CPL 440.10.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Denman, Boomer, Pine and Balio, JJ.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JOSE LUIS REYNA

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee.

No. 4D2024

- 1091

[ August 22, 2024 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Caroline C. Shepherd

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502000CF013843AXXX

.

Jose L. Reyna, Wewahitchka

, pro se

.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

K LINGENSMITH

, C.J., K UNTZ and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph Petty, Appellant.

*835We find no basis in the record for disturbing the hearing court’s determination that the defendant’s confession was voluntarily made *(see, People v Foskey,*115 AD2d 558; *People v Armstead,*98 AD2d 726). Mangano, J. P., Weinstein, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit** 23.2
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS**
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements(Forms S-8 No. 333-12107, No. 333-15237, No. 333-88077, No. 333-88079, No.333-46938, No. 333-61570 and No. 333-103811) pertaining to the Company’sEmployee Stock Purchase Plan, Amended and Restated Omnibus Stock Plan and 2001Stock Option Plan for Directors of ACE*COMM Corporation of our report datedAugust 22, 2003, with respect to the financial statement and schedule ofACE*COMM Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the yearended June 30, 2003, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
----

**Exhibit 31.1**

CERTIFICATION 

I, Marc Hazout, certifythat: 

1.     I have reviewed thisreport on Form 10-KSB/A; 

2.     Based on my knowledge,this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report; 

3.     Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisannual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this annual report; 4. The registrant's other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

(a)    designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisannual report is being prepared; 

(b)    evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and 

(c)    disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registration'sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant'sinternal control over financial reporting; and 

5.     The registrant's othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and theaudit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function): 

(a)    all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

(b)    any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting. 

Date: July 17, 2007 

/s/ MarcHazout                

By: Marc HazoutPresident and Chief Executive Officer

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       4,179,000
<SECURITIES>                                 6,779,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,739,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    37,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            23,160,000
<PP&E>                                      10,530,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,483,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,335,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,998,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    48,638,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (26,451,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,187,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            52,434,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               52,107,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               114,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                868,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   364,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            504,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   504,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

_________________________________

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD,

Complainant

vs.

JEFFREY ALLEN LAYTON,

Respondent.

_________________________________

Docket Number 2023-0280

Enforcement Activity No. 7721833

CONSENT ORDER

Issued: January 4, 2024

By Administrative Law Judge: Honorable Timothy G. Stueve

Appearances:

Daniel Shaefer, Esq.

Jennifer A. Mehaffey, Esq. 

United States Coast Guard Suspension & Revocation

National Center of Expertise 

Jason U. Bartholomew

Sector Sault Ste. Marie

For the Coast Guard

Robert L. Reeb, Esq.

Kenderick M. Jordan, Esq.

Attorneys for Respondent
CONSENT ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

On or about December 24, 2023, the parties in this case submitted a Motion for Approval 

of Settlement Agreement and Entry of Consent Order to be approved as a settlement of the case 

under 33 C.F.R. § 20.502.

I have carefully reviewed the terms of the Settlement Agreement and find it is fair and 

reasonable and in substantial compliance with the requirements of 33 C.F.R. § 20.502.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the record, it is hereby ORDERED, the Settlement Agreement is 

APPROVED in full and incorporated herein by reference. This Consent Order shall constitute 

full, final, and complete adjudication of this proceeding.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that Respondent’s Motions for Further Discovery filed 

on December 20, 2023 is WITHDRAWN as moot. 

 

_____________________

Honorable Timothy G. Stueve

Done and dated January 4, 2024, at Administrative Law Judge

Alameda, California U.S. Coast Guard
# C_2021393EN.01000501.xml

| 29.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 393/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 393/5

---

Notice for the attention of the persons to whom restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2012/285/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 377/2012 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies threatening the peace, security or stability of the Republic of Guinea-Bissau apply

(2021/C 393/05)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in Annexes II and III to Council Decision 2012/285/CFSP (1) and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 377/2012 (2) concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies threatening the peace, security or stability of the Republic of Guinea-Bissau.

The Council of the European Union, after having reviewed the list of persons designated in the above-mentioned Annexes, has determined that the restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2012/285/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 377/2012 should continue to apply to those persons.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites listed in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 377/2012, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned lists should be reconsidered, by 31 October 2021, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1.C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1.C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

---

(1)  OJ L 142, 1.6.2012, p. 36.

(2)  OJ L 119, 4.5.2012, p. 1.

---
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
following Registration Statements:



|(1) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-13875) pertaining to the Non-Plan Stock Options, 1996 Equity Incentive Plan, 1996 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan and
Employee Stock Purchase Plan,
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-43992) pertaining to the 1996 Equity Incentive Plan,
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(3) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-58173) pertaining to the Non-Plan Stock Options, 1996 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended, and 1996 Non-Employee Directors Stock
Option Plan, as amended,
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(4) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-108324) pertaining to the 1996 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended, and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(5) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-137203) pertaining to the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan;
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

of our reports dated March 23, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Hot Topic, Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Hot Topic, Inc.
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended January 31, 2009.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG, LLP

Los Angeles, California

March 23, 2009
#### TAYLOR, Respondent, v. GEER, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department.

May 18, 1894.)

Action by Andrew J. Taylor against Reuben H. Geer, as executor, etc.

Argued before HARDIN, P. J., and MARTIN and MERWIN, JJ.

No opinion. Judgment and order reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to ábide the event. Held, (1) the court erred in admitting evidence of the plaintiff of a conversation with defendant’s testatrix, which he testifies occurred when no one else was present (see Martin v. Hillen, 142 N. Y. —, 36 N. E. 803); (2) that the request to charge as to presumption of ownership of-the money from the possession of the orders should have been granted.