alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Listen

# The Civil Rights Implications of Cash Bail

This project will evaluate the current state of money bail in operation in states and local jurisdictions around the country, and how it impacts the fair administration of justice as well as whether it operates in a manner that denies equal protection of the law to individuals on the basis of race or another protected class. It will also evaluate the role of the private bail industry and how the involvement of the private sector exacerbates or mitigates these impacts. The project will also evaluate different reforms that have been enacted to address these systemic impacts, either by state legislation, citizen referendums, litigation settlements, or otherwise. In evaluating these reforms, the project will look at whether federal involvement has impacted the state of money bail, and what the appropriate role of the federal government is to ensure the fair administration of justice.

Friday, February 26, 2021 - 10:00 AM

Briefing Agenda and Confirmed Panelists

Sunshine Act Notice

Panelist Materials

The Civil Rights Implications of Cash Bail

Maryland: Fees and Fines and Bail Reform in Maryland (2018)

Oregon: Pretrial Detention, Release, and Bail Practice in Oregon (2021)

Kentucky: Locked Up for Being Poor: The Need for Bail Reform in Kentucky (2021)

Rafael Mangual – Fellow & Deputy Director, Manhattan Institute

Insha Rahman – Vice President of Advocacy and Partnerships, Vera Institute of Justice

Lars Trautman – Resident Senior Fellow, R Street Institute

William Bratton – Executive Chairman of Teneo Risk & Former Commissioner of NYPD and Chief of LAPD

Glenn Grant – Acting Administrative Director, New Jersey Courts

DeAnna Hoskins – President & CEO, JustLeadership

Michelle Esquenazi – President, National Association of Bail Agents

Elijah Gwynn – Co-Founder & CTO, UpTrust

Erika Maye – Deputy Senior Campaigns Director for Criminal Justice, Color of Change

Megan Stevenson, Ph.D. – Associate Professor of Law, University of Virginia

February 26, 2021

February 26, 2021

February 26, 2021

-  Event Calendar 
-  Public Briefings 
-  Commission Business Meetings 
-  Advisory Committees Meetings 
-  Archives
In the Senate of the United States, 

December 10, 2015. 

Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 2250) entitled ‘‘An Act making appropriations for 

the Legislative Branch for the fiscal year ending September 

30, 2016, and for other purposes.’’, do pass with the following 

AMENDMENTS: 

Strike all after the enacting clause and insert the 

following: 

1 That the Continuing Appropriations Act, 2016 (Public Law 

2 114–53) is amended by striking the date specified in section 

3 106(3) and inserting ‘‘December 16, 2015’’. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Further Con5 tinuing Appropriations Act, 2016’’. 
2 

† HR 2250 EAS 

Amend the title so as to read: ‘‘Further Continuing 

Appropriations Act, 2016’’. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H.R. 2250 

AMENDMENTS
#### In the Matter of the Guardianship of Chantel Nicole R., Appellant. Pamela R., Respondent; Attorney General of the State of New York, Intervenor.

Submitted January 8, 2007;

decided January 16, 2007

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. 040-08778] 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        The application for the license amendment and supporting documentation are available for inspection at NRC's Public Electronic Reading Room at                         *http://www.nrc.gov/​NRC/​ADAMS/​index.html.*                         Any questions with respect to this action should be referred to Roy Person, Decommissioning Branch, Division of Waste Management, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. Telephone: (301) 415-6701. Fax: (301) 415-5398.                     

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this day of April 2000. 

Robert A. Nelson, 

Acting Chief, Decommissioning Branch, Division of Waste Management, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.

[FR Doc. 00-9465 Filed 4-14-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
# C_2021081EN.01000101.xml

| 10.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 81/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 81/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8982 — Ivanhoe Cambridge/PSPIB/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 81/01)

On 30 August 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8982. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8982. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
|Exhibit 99.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the
Annual Report of Liberté Investors Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ellen V.
Billings, Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:


(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ ELLEN V. BILLINGS

Ellen V. Billings
Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer
September 27, 2002
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD,

Complainant,

vs.

JESS BRANDON MCKINSTRY.

Respondent.

Docket Number 2023-0113

CG Enforcement Activity Number 764f,J20

CONSENT oRDER

Issued: Ju ne 8. 2023

H no G J Ad e

Appearances:

MORGAN KINGSTON

USCG Sector puget Sound

For the Coast Cuard

JESS BRANDON MCKINSTRy, pra se For the Respondent

I
CONSENT ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

On May 25. 2023. the pa(ies in this case submitted an Amended Motion for Approval of

Settlement Agreement and Entry ofConsent Order to be approved as a settlement ofthe case

under 33 C.F.R. $ 20.502.

I have carefully reviewed the terms ofthe Settlement Agreement and find it is fair and

reasonable and in substantial compliance with the requirements of33 C.F.R. $ 20.502.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the record, it is hereby ORDERED, the Settlement Agreement is

APPROVED in full and incorporated herein by reference. This Consent Order shall constitute

full. final. and complete adjudication of this proceeding.

SO ORDERED.

Done and dated June 8, 2023.

Seattle. Washington

George J. Jordan

Administrative Law Judge

United States Coast Guard

2
Exhibit 10.6 


 


Undertaking on
the Non-appropriation of the Issuer’s Funds and External Guarantee


 


In
view of the fact that Jinko Solar Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Issuer”) intends to apply for an initial
public offering of shares and listing on the STAR Market, the Company, as the Controlling Shareholder of the Issuer, hereby undertakes,
in accordance with the relevant regulations on the IPO and the relevant requirements of the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as
follows:


 


As
of the date when this undertaking is given, the Company and the enterprises controlled it (other than the Issuer and its holding subsidiaries)
have not appropriated funds, assets or resources of the Issuer or its subsidiaries by way of borrowings, loan at call, entrusted loans,
entrusted investments, issuance of commercial acceptances without genuine transaction background, payment of debts on behalf of the Issuer,
advances on behalf of the Issuer or its holding subsidiaries or in any other manner, nor have they provided guarantees for the Company
and the enterprises controlled it through the Issuer and its holding subsidiaries.


 


The
Company hereby confirms that the above undertaking of the Company is true and the Company is willing to bear the legal liabilities arising
from the breach of the above undertaking.


 


Undertaking
on the Non-appropriation of the Issuer’s Funds and External Guarantee 


 






     


     


    

 


(There is no text
in this page. It is the signature page of Undertaking on the Non-appropriation of the Issuer’s Funds and External Guarantee.)


 


	 	Undertaken by: JinkoSolar Investment Limited (Seal)
	 	 
	 	By: /s/ Li Xiande
	 	 
	 	Date: June 21, 2021



 


Signature Page of Undertaking on the Non-appropriation of the
Issuer’s Funds and External Guarantee
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 28, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00327

- CV

Maxine ADAMS and Cecil Adams

,

Appellants

v.

Christopher PRINE

, Appellee

From the 269th District Court, Harris County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- 35653

- a Honorable Dan Hinde, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

By order dated June 10, 2016, appellants were ordered to provide written proof that any supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records necessary for the resolution of this appeal were requested and payment arrangements for the preparation of any such records were made. On June 24, 2016, appellants responded and provided the court with notice that a supplemental clerk’s record had been requested and payment arrangements were made. On June 27, 2016, a supplemental clerk’s record was filed. Accordingly, the ap pellate record is complete. Appellant’s brief must be filed no later than July 27, 2016.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 28th day of June, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         JUN-30-1997 
<PERIOD-START>                            JUN-30-1996  
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                            166    
<SECURITIES>                                        0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                  29,925 
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (310)
<INVENTORY>                                    49,718
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               85,474       
<PP&E>                                         93,137      
<DEPRECIATION>                                (6,101)   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                526,432      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          93,872    
<BONDS>                                       307,012  
<COMMON>                                            0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                         0 
<OTHER-SE>                                    122,551      
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  526,432         
<SALES>                                       193,046          
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              193,046          
<CGS>                                          83,581          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 163,490          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               14,921       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   60      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             16,603       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (2,028)      
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (811)      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (1,217)      
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0      
<CHANGES>                                           0  
<NET-INCOME>                                  (1,217) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0 
        
                                  


</TABLE>
# C_2021459EN.01001401.xml

| 12.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 459/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 459/14

---

EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR DISEASE PREVENTION AND CONTROL

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2020

(2021/C 459/14)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/ECDC-Final-annual-accounts-2020.pdf

---
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 10.68

              CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY
                  WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.
                       ASTERISKS (*) DENOTE SUCH OMISSIONS

                                  SUPPLEMENTAL
                                  AGREEMENT # 4
                             to Contract # 11-21-01
                             dated November 27, 2000


Khabarovsk                                                      November 1, 2001

Closed Joint-Stock Company "Forest-Starma", a legal entity, organized and
existing under the laws of the Russian federation, (hereinafter referred to as
the Seller), in the person of Mr. David B.Daggett, General Director, and Mr.
V.A.Limarenko, First Deputy General Director, on the one side, and Rayonier,
Inc., USA, (hereinafter referred to as the Buyer), in the person of Mr. Robert
J.Cartano, Director Operations, have entered into the present Supplemental
Agreement to Contract # 11-21-01 dated November 27, 2000, including all its
revisions and individual addenda:

1.   In addition to the volume specified in section 1 "Subject of the Contract",
     the Seller agrees to sell, and the Buyer agrees to buy, on the terms
     contained in the above mentioned Contract and all individual addenda to the
     Contract, logs produced by the Seller in the volume of *** cubic meters +/-
     10%. The approximate value of this volume of exported logs is 3.000.000
     USD.

2.   The other terms of the Contract remain without change.

3.   The present Supplemental Agreement # 4 have been made in two (2) original
     copies in Russian and English, each of which have equal legal force. Both
     original and faxed signatures of the duly authorized representatives of the
     Parties shall be recognized as having equal legal force with regard to the
     execution of this Contract.

The present Agreement is signed and enters into force on November 1, 2001.

SELLER:

 /s/ David B. Daggett
--------------------------------
David B.Daggett
General Director

 /s/ V. A. Limarenko
--------------------------------
Limarenko V.A.
First Deputy General Director

BUYER:

 /s/ Robert J. Cartano
--------------------------------
Robert J.Cartano
Operations Director
International Forest Products
Exhibit 10.16a


HOT TOPIC, INC.


18305 East San Jose Ave.


City of Industry, California 91748




March 21, 2011




Jim McGinty


18305 East San Jose Ave.


City of Industry, CA 91748





Re:   Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Letter Agreement





Dear Jim:





This amendment (this “Amendment”) to your Amended and Restated Employment Letter Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Hot Topic, Inc. (the “Company”), dated November 24, 2008, amends the terms and conditions of the Agreement to the extent provided herein.  From and after the execution of this Amendment by the parties hereto, this Amendment shall form a part of the Agreement for all purposes and any reference to the Agreement shall be deemed a reference to the Agreement as amended hereby.  Except as specifically amended as set forth herein, each term and condition of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and continue in full force and effect.




1. SECTION 2. The first sentence of Section 2 of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: “Effective as of March 16, 2011, your base salary is $500,000 per year, less payroll deductions and all required withholdings, which is subject to annual review.”




2. SECTION 3. The following sentences are hereby added at the end of Section 3 of the Agreement: “Notwithstanding the foregoing, subject to you being continuously employed by the Company through March 16, 2012 (the “Retention Bonus Date”), the Company shall pay you a retention bonus of $400,000 (the “Retention Bonus”) on the Retention Bonus Date.  Such Retention Bonus shall be in lieu of any other Bonus that you may be entitled to with respect to the Company’s 2011 fiscal year and shall be pro-rated and payable upon termination of your employment in the event your employment is involuntarily terminated by the Company without Cause (as defined below) prior to the Retention Bonus Date.”




3. SECTION 6. The references to “six (6) months” in Section 6 of the Agreement are hereby replaced with “twelve (12) months.”




4. GOVERNING LAW. This Amendment shall be governed by and construed according to the laws of the State of California.




5. COUNTERPARTS. This Amendment may be executed via facsimile and in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original and both of which, when taken together, shall constitute one and the same instrument.






1






If the above terms are acceptable to you, please sign this Amendment and return it to the Company at your earliest convenience.




Sincerely,




Bruce Quinnell, Chairman of the Board


Accepted and Agreed:




Jim McGinty
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Peter Washington, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schneier, J.), rendered March 21, 1985, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur. *[See,*127 Misc 2d 451.]
#### Robert P. Stanwick, Appellant, v A.R.A. Services, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Andrew P. Meloni, as Sheriff of Monroe County, et al., Respondents.

*1042The attorney-client privilege extends only to communications and not to facts *(Upjohn Co. v United States,*449 US 383, 395-396). The Sheriff, his attorney Ms. Farber, and the other witnesses may well possess knowledge and facts which would not be privileged and which are properly discoverable *(see, City of Elmira v Larry Walter, Inc.,*89 AD2d 645, 646). Hence the direction that the plaintiff may not, without a waiver from the Sheriff, require Farber or the others to disclose the substance of the meeting’s conversation is too broad.

The record reveals that other than conclusory statements made in the affidavits of Sheriff Meloni and Ms. Farber, there is no showing of what statements may be privileged. The person asserting the privilege has the burden of sustaining that claim *(Matter of Priest v Hennessy,*51 NY2d 62, 69). To make a valid claim of privilege, it must be shown that the information sought to be protected from disclosure was a "confidential communication” made to the attorney for the purpose of obtaining legal advice or services *(Matter of Priest v Hennessy, supra; Matter of Jacqueline F.,*47 NY2d 215, 219). The proper procedure would be for the witnesses to raise the privilege put to a specific question and let Special Term determine whether there is merit to the witness’ claim of privilege as to that question. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Boehm, J. — compel disclosure.) Present —Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Denman and Boomer, JJ.