alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Jeffrey M. Singer, Appellant, v Linda A. Prizer, Respondent.

[946 NYS2d 584]

— In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Dane, J.), dated October 26, 2011, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Cahn, S.M.), dated August 19, 2011, which, upon, in effect, granting that branch of the mother’s motion which was to dismiss his petition to terminate his child support obligation, dismissed his petition.

Ordered that the order dated October 26, 2011, is affirmed, with costs.

*861The father annexed to his petition a so-ordered stipulation settling certain prior litigation between the parties. By attaching the stipulation to the petition, the father made the stipulation *“a*part of’ the petition “for all purposes” *(805 Third Ave. Co. v M.W. Realty Assoc.,*58 NY2d 447, 451 [1983]; *see*CPLR 3014).

In the stipulation, the father agreed to pay certain child support to the mother, who, pursuant to the parties’ judgment of divorce, had sole custody of the parties’ child. The father also agreed that he would not “bring on any application to . . . modify” the child support obligation he agreed to.

Under the circumstances, the father was precluded from commencing a proceeding such as the instant proceeding. Therefore, the cause of action alleged in the petition was “completely undermined and rendered legally insufficient by the very terms of’ the stipulation *(Manchester Equip. Co. v Panasonic Indus. Co.,*141 AD2d 616, 617 [1988]). Accordingly, the Family Court properly, in effect, granted that branch of the mother’s motion which was to dismiss the petition *(id.*at 617-618).

In light of our determination, we need not reach the father’s remaining contentions.

We decline the mother’s request for the imposition of sanctions against the father pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 in connection with this appeal. Skelos, J.P., Leventhal, Chambers and Roman, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pyramid Breweries Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Scott Barnum, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act OF 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ SCOTT BARNUM
-------------------------------------
Scott Barnum
President and Chief Executive Officer
November 13, 2006
# C_2021305EN.01003101.xml

| 30.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/31

---

Notice for the attention of persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/1251, and in Council Regulation (EU) 2016/44, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1241, concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya

(2021/C 305/04)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons and entities designated in Annexes II and IV to Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/1251 (2), and in Annex III to Council Regulation (EU) 2016/44 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1241 (4), concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya.

The attention of the persons and entities concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites in Annex IV to Regulation (EU) 2016/44, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 8 of the Regulation).

The persons and entities concerned may submit a request to the Council before 15 May 2022, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered. Any such request should be sent to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1.C. |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1.C.

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council's periodic review, in accordance with Article 17(2) of Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 and Article 21(6) of Regulation (EU) 2016/44, of the list of designated persons and entities.

The attention of the persons and entities concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council's decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 206, 1.8.2015, p. 34.

(2)  OJ L 272, 30.7.2021, p.71.

(3)  OJ L 12, 19.1.2016, p. 1.

(4)  OJ L 272, 30.7.2021, p.1.

---
#### WARE, Appellant, v. DOS PASSOS et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 15, 1897.)

Action by William H. Ware against Benjamin F. Dos Passos and others. R. Weil, for appellant. S. G. Adams, for respondents.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
#### LAGACE, Respondent, v. TROY WASTE MANUF’G CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

December 2, 1896.)

Action by Joseph Lagace, by guardian, against the Troy Waste Manufacturing Company.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except PARKER, P. J., and PUTNAM, J.
Dismiss and Opinion Filed November 14, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-23-00349-CV

DANITA J. HARRIS, Appellant

V.

CR PROPERTYWISE LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-23-01309-D

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Nowell, Miskel, and Kennedy

Opinion by Justice Nowell

Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. After appellant failed to respond to 

our inquiry regarding the reporter’s record, we ordered the appeal submitted without 

a reporter’s record and for appellant’s brief to be filed by October 11, 2023. By 

postcard dated October 13, 2023, we informed appellant her brief was overdue and 

directed her to file her brief within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to 

do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1). To date, appellant has not filed her brief or otherwise

corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. 
–2–

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8 (a)(1); 42.3(b), 

(c).

230349f.p05

/Erin A. Nowell/

ERIN A. NOWELL

JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

DANITA J. HARRIS, Appellant

No. 05-23-00349-CV V.

CR PROPERTYWISE LLC, 

Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at 

Law No. 4, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-23-01309-

D.

Opinion delivered by Justice Nowell. 

Justices Miskel and Kennedy 

participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is 

DISMISSED.

Judgment entered this 14th day of November, 2023.
# C_2021459EN.01003401.xml

| 12.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 459/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 459/34

---

EUROPEAN UNION AGENCY FOR THE OPERATIONAL MANAGEMENT OF LARGE-SCALE IT SYSTEMS IN THE AREA OF FREEDOM, SECURITY AND JUSTICE

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2020

(2021/C 459/34)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://www.eulisa.europa.eu/AboutUs/Finance/Annual%20Accounts/FY2020_eu-LISA_Final_Annual_Accounts.pdf

---
# C_2022323EN.01013401.xml

| 26.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 323/134 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 323/134

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 and Regulation (EU) No 223/2014 as regards increased pre-financing from REACT-EU resources

(COM(2022) 145 final — 2022/0096 (COD))

Amended proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 and Regulation (EU) No 223/2014 as regards increased pre-financing from REACT-EU resources

(COM(2022) 162 final — 2022/0096 (COD))

(2022/C 323/24)

| Referral | Council of the European Union, 25.3.2022 and 4.4.2022
  European Parliament, 4.4.2022 |
| --- | --- |
| Legal basis | Articles 175(3), 177 and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union |
| Section responsible | Economic and Monetary Union and Economic and Social Cohesion |
| Adopted at plenary | 18.5.2022 |
| Plenary session No | 569 |
| Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions) | 179/0/4 |

Referral

Council of the European Union, 25.3.2022 and 4.4.2022

European Parliament, 4.4.2022

Legal basis

Articles 175(3), 177 and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Section responsible

Economic and Monetary Union and Economic and Social Cohesion

Adopted at plenary

18.5.2022

Plenary session No

569

Outcome of vote

(for/against/abstentions)

179/0/4

Since the Committee endorses the content of both proposals for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 and Regulation (EU) No 223/2014 as regards increased pre-financing from REACT-EU resources and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 569th plenary session of 18 and 19 May 2022, (meeting of 18 May), by 179 votes with 4 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 18 May 2022.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Christa SCHWENG

---
# C_2021360EN.01000501.xml

| 8.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 360/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 360/5

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10144 — K+S Minerals and Agriculture/REMEX/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 360/05)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | K+S Minerals and Agriculture GmbH (Germany), belonging to the group K+S-AG (‘K+S’, Germany), |
| --- | --- |

—

K+S Minerals and Agriculture GmbH (Germany), belonging to the group K+S-AG (‘K+S’, Germany),

| — | REMEX GmbH (Germany) (together with its subsidiaries ‘REMEX’), belonging to the group RETHMANN SE & Co. KG (Germany), |
| --- | --- |

—

REMEX GmbH (Germany) (together with its subsidiaries ‘REMEX’), belonging to the group RETHMANN SE & Co. KG (Germany),

| — | REKS GmbH & Co. KG (‘REKS’, the ‘JV’ Germany), currently belonging to K+S. |
| --- | --- |

—

REKS GmbH & Co. KG (‘REKS’, the ‘JV’ Germany), currently belonging to K+S.

K+S and REMEX acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the whole of ‘REKS’ .

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares in a newly created company constituting a joint venture.

2.

| — | for K+S: salt and potash mining and provider of waste disposal services in its mines in underground landfills (‘UTD’) and underground storage facilities (‘UTV’), |
| --- | --- |

—

for K+S: salt and potash mining and provider of waste disposal services in its mines in underground landfills (‘UTD’) and underground storage facilities (‘UTV’),

| — | for REMEX: provider of waste disposal services for hazardous and non-hazardous waste, including UTV, |
| --- | --- |

—

for REMEX: provider of waste disposal services for hazardous and non-hazardous waste, including UTV,

| — | for REKS: provider of waste disposal services, including UTD, UTV and covering large tailings piles at potash sites. |
| --- | --- |

—

for REKS: provider of waste disposal services, including UTD, UTV and covering large tailings piles at potash sites.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10144 — K+S Minerals and Agriculture/REMEX/JV

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
ADMINISTRATIVE NON-JUDICIAL PUNISHMENT (NJP) CHECKLIST, 

Article 15 UCMJ 

Ref: Military Justice Manual, COMDTINST M5810 (series) 

 Manual for Courts-Martial, MCM 2019 

 Personnel & Pay Procedures Manual, PPCINST M1000.2 (series) 

 Coast Guard Pay Manual, COMDTINST M7220.29 (series) 

 Discipline and Conduct, COMDTINST M1600.2 (series) 

 Enlisted Accessions, Evaluations, and Advancements, COMDTINST M1000.2 (series) 

 Officer Accessions, Evaluations, and Promotions, COMDTINST M1000.3 (series) 

Step Action Who Completed 

1. Advise member of his or her rights under Article 31(b), (UCMJ and 

Miranda/Tempia Rights, CG-5810E) PIO 

2. Complete command directed investigation and provide recommendation 

for disposition on CG-4910 (Report of Offense and Disposition, and 

Record of Non-Judicial Punishment) 

PIO 

3. Information concerning accused section of CG-4910 ADMIN 

4. Initial disposition (part II, CG-4910) XO 

5. PIO information (part III, CG-4910) PIO 

6. Provide recommendation for disposition (part IV, CG-4910) PIO/XO 

7. Direction of Commanding Officer (part V, CG-4910) CO 

8. Notification of Accused for Disposition at Capt’s Mast (part VI, CG-4910) XO 

 8a. May be necessary to again advise member of rights under Art.31(b), 

UCMJ 

XO 

 8b. Appoint or have member select a mast representative XO 

 8c. Member completes the appropriate CG-5810(A or B ashore)(C or D 

attached/embarked on vessel)(Acknowledgment of Rights – Acceptance of 

NJP) 

XO 

 8d. Provide member (not attached/embarked on vessel) the opportunity to 

consult with an attorney. 

XO 

 8e. Provide copy of CG-4910 to the accused XO 

9. Member and Mast Representative review copy of CG-4910, witness 

statements, evidence, and any other pertinent information concerning the 

case. 

XO 

10. Conduct Capt.’s Mast (guidance and script provided in Military Justice 

Manual, 2.K.10) 

CO 

11. Completion of Record of NJP (part VII, CG-4910) CO 

12. Forward the CG-4910 for final administrative action (part VIII, CG-4910) CO/ADMIN 

13. Forward copy to SPO for Direct Access entry and court memorandum ADMIN 

14a. Enlisted: Complete a Discipline EER (Good Conduct Medal eligibility 

termination CG-3307 not required) 

CO 

14b. Officer: Prepare a special OER including the Reported-on Officer’s 

performance and any other matter on which the officer may be evaluated 

CO 

15. Cancel ‘A’ School application/placement, if applicable CO/ADMIN 

16. Initiate report (CG-5588) to the CG Security Center XO/ADMIN 

17. File complete mast package in unit punishment log for 4 years 

 Original CG-4910 

 Disciplinary Action (court memorandum) print out 

 CG-5810 

 PIO report and all enclosures 

 Final action on appeal, if any 

ADMIN
Skip to main content

Privacy Policy•Site map

# Links

These links will open a new browser window outside of our site.
                                    - Administrative Office of the United States Courts
                                    - PACER Service Center  You may also contact the PACER Service Center at 800-676-6856.

----

Howard T. Markey National Courts Building • 717 Madison Place, NW, Washington, DC 20439 • 202-357-6400
Commandant Instruction M5810.1D		

Sample Action Under RCM 1112(F)

			5814			5 January 2012

ACTION OF THE OFFICER EXERCISING GENERAL COURT-MARTIAL JURISDICTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH RCM 1112(f), MCM IN THE SPECIAL/SUMMARY COURT-MARTIAL CASE OFSN IVAN M. SMITHY [EMPLID], USCG

In the foregoing case of SN Ivan M. SMITHY [EMPLID], USCG, USCGC NORTHLAND (WMEC 904), the findings of guilty of Charge I, and the two specifications alleged thereunder, are disapproved and are therefore dismissed.  The findings of guilty of Charge II and the specification thereunder alleging a violation of Article 121, UCMJ are approved.  The sentence approved by the Convening Authority is approved.

W. W. WATERSRear Admiral, U. S. Coast Guard

Enclosure (18h)	2
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 218 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the maximum age for 

children eligible for medical care under the CHAMPVA program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 8, 2015 

Ms. BROWN of Florida (for herself and Mr. WALZ) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the 

maximum age for children eligible for medical care under 

the CHAMPVA program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘CHAMPVA Children’s 

5 Protection Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASE OF MAXIMUM AGE FOR CHILDREN ELIGI7 BLE FOR MEDICAL CARE UNDER CHAMPVA 

8 PROGRAM. 

9 (a) INCREASE.—Section 1781(c) of title 38, United 

10 States Code, is amended— 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 218 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘twenty-three’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘twenty-six’’; and 

3 (2) by striking ‘‘twenty-third birthday’’ and in4 serting ‘‘twenty-sixth birthday’’. 

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

6 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to medical care pro7 vided on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES OF ANIERICA

DEPARTIlIENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARI)

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD.

Complainant,

JUAN NORBERT SERRALLES,

Respondent.

Docket Number 2023-0037

Enforcement Activity No. 7620555

CONSENT ORDER

lssued Bv: Honorable Georse J. Jordan. Administrative Law

Issued: Februarv 24. 2023

Appearances:

CWO Michael Micucci

USCG Sector Miami

Por the Coast Guard

Juan Norbert Serralles,pro se

For Respondent

VS

Judse
CONSENT ORDERAPPR o\,'ING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

)

On February 3,2023,the Coast Guard hled a Complaint against Juan Norbert

Serralles (Respondent) alleging one count of Violation ofLaw, as described by 46 U.S.C.

$ 7703(1)(A) and defined by 46 CFR $ 5.33. The Coast Guard alleged that Respondent

was found in violation of46 CFR $ 25.30-JO and 46 CFR $ 25.25-5, which is a violation

ofregulation.

On or about February 3,2023, the parties in this case submitted a Motion for

Approval of Settlement Agreement and Entry of Consent Order to be approved as a

settlement of the case under 33 C.F.R. S 20.502.

After carefully reviewing the terms of the Settlement Agreement, I find that it is

fair, reasonable, and in substantial compliance with the requirements of 33 C.F.R. $

20.502.
ORDER

lr

Upon consideration of the record, it is hereby ORDERED that the Settlement

Agreement is APPROVED in full and incorporated herein by reference.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Consent Order shall constitute full, final,

and complete adjudication ofthis proceeding.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

HON. GEORGE J. JORDAN

TINITED STATES COAST GUARD

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE

Done and dated February 24,2023,

at Seattle, WA

l

_-2"
#### Miller, Respondent, *v.*New Jersey Steam-Boat Co., Appellant.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.*

June 6, 1890.)

Mo opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs to respondent, to abide event of appeal.
Order entered May 13, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01105-CV

CHELSEA DAVIS, Appellant

V.

HARLAN CROW, Appellee

On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-13-23109

ORDER

By letter dated April 29, 2015, we directed Dallas County District Clerk Felicia Pitre to 

file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a copy of (1) the trial court’s June 24, 2014 

dismissal order; (2) the trial court’s July 28, 2014 sanctions order; and (3) the August 29, 2014 

notice of appeal filed by appellant Chelsea Davis. To date, however, the record has not been 

filed. Accordingly, we ORDER Ms. Pitre to file the requested supplemental record no later than 

May 18, 2015. 

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Pitre and all 

parties.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE