alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Allegations Related to COVID-19 Vaccine Injuries are NOT 

Adjudicated in the United States Court of Federal Claims

While the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) permits the United States Court 

of Federal Claims to provide compensation to individuals found to be injured by certain vaccines, 

the COVID-19 vaccine is not currently covered by this Program. The COVID-19 vaccine is instead 

covered by the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP), which is administered by

the Health Resources & Services Administration. Therefore, any petition filed in the United 

States Court of Federal Claims alleging that an injury was caused by the COVID-19 vaccine 

will be dismissed.

A countermeasure is a vaccination, medication, device, or other item recommended to diagnose, 

prevent, or treat a declared pandemic, epidemic, or security threat. The CICP provides benefits to 

individuals who have experienced serious physical injuries as a direct result of the administration 

or use of covered countermeasures identified by the Secretary of the United States Department of 

Health and Human Services in declarations issued under the Public Readiness and Emergency 

Preparedness Act (PREP Act), 42 U.S.C. §§ 247d-6d, 247d-6e. 

For a comparison between the VICP and the CICP, please visit https://www.hrsa.gov/cicp/cicpvicp. 

Please direct any inquiries relating to COVID-19 vaccine injuries to: 

Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP)

1-855-266-2427 (1-855-266-CICP)

cicp@hrsa.gov

https://www.hrsa.gov/cicp
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D2023

- 2145

_____________________________
J ONATHAN G ASTON P ACE , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Franklin County

. Francis J. Allman, Jr. , Judge

.

July 12, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , R OBERTS , and R AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Ross Scott Haine, II, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee; Michael L. MacNamara, Assistant Publi c Defender, Apalachicola
, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Christina Piotrowski, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Elyi Royfe, Appellant.

The defendant’s initial incriminating statement to the arresting officer, to the effect that setting the fire was not his *839idea, and that he was only helping his friend, was made spontaneously, without any provocation or interrogation by the police. His later explanation as to why the fire was set, was also made without provocation or questioning by the police. The conduct of the police could not reasonably have been anticipated to evoke a declaration from the defendant *(see, People v Lynes,*49 NY2d 286, 295). Therefore, both of these statements were properly deemed admissible. Mollen, P. J., Brown, Niehoff and Hooper, JJ., concur.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 41101 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee

v. FRANCISCO ANTONIO GRIEGO,
Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:15 -CR- 1100 -1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Francisco Antonio Griego has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Griego ha s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 11, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-41101 Document: 00514067452 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/11/2017No. 16

- 41101

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdr aw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-41101 Document: 00514067452 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/11/2017
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-50826

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE DE JESUS GARCIA,

Also Known as Jose Jesus Garcia, Also Known as Jose Garcia,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

No. 5:08-CR-325-1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The attorney appointed to represent Jose de Jesus Garcia has moved for

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

January 26, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

January 26, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 09-50826 Document: 00511361744 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/26/2011
No. 09-50826

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967). Garcia has not filed a response.

We do not enforce Garcia’s appeal waiver in light of the district court’s

failure to admonish him adequately of its consequences. Nevertheless, our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue

for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

Case: 09-50826 Document: 00511361744 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/26/2011
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AU GUST 24, 2016

NO. 03

- 16

- 00072

- CV

Jorge Falcon, Appellant

v.

Texas Public Safety Commission, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PUR YEAR, PEMBERTON, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on January 8, 2016. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error

in the judgment . Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s judgment

. A ppellant shall pay all

costs relating to thi s appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                     EXHIBIT 8.1

                                  SUBSIDIARIES

                               PETSEC ENERGY LTD.

                               CONTROLLED ENTITIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                     PLACE OF              % OF
                                                     --------              ----
            CONTROLLED ENTITIES                   INCORPORATION          OWNERSHIP
            -------------------                   -------------          ---------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                               <C>                    <C>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Petsec Investments Pty. Limited                     Australia              100
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Petroleum Securities Pty. Limited                   Australia              100
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Najedo Pty. Limited                                 Australia              100
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Petroleum Securities Share Plan Pty. Limited        Australia              100
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Petsec America Pty. Limited                         Australia              100
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Petsec (U.S.A.) Inc.                                 U.S.A.                100
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Petsec Petroleum Inc.                                U.S.A.                100
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Petsec Energy Inc.                                   U.S.A.                100
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Osglen Pty. Limited                                 Australia             80.7
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Laurel Bay Petroleum Limited                        Australia              100
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ginida Pty. Limited                                 Australia              100
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Western Medical Products Pty. Limited               Australia              100
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Blount International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James S. Osterman,Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(i)            The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periodsexpressed in the report.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to BlountInternational, Inc. and will be retained by Blount International, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

 

Date: August 7, 2009

 

 
| /s/ James S. Osterman   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| James S. Osterman       |
| Chairman and            |
| Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
#### P.J. Garvey Carting & Storage, Inc., Appellant, v County of Erie et al., Respondents.

— Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff, an unsuccessful bidder on the 1984 contract to transport and deliver voting machines for defendants, brought this action for money damages, claiming a loss due to the unauthorized use and release of its prior "route list” by defendants in solicitation for bids. Plaintiff submitted this list to defendants in 1983 for use in loading the machines onto plaintiffs trucks for transportation to election districts. The route list does not constitute a trade secret *(see, Eagle Comtronics v Pico, Inc.,*89 AD2d 803, *Iv denied*58 NY2d 547) as it can be created by any knowledgeable person in the moving business. The affidavit of plaintiff’s competitor (Wilson) attests to this conclusion. Thus, the complaint was properly dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7). In our view, the Freedom of Information Law (Public Officers Law art 6) has no application to plaintiff’s complaint as the "route list” prepared by the plaintiff is not a document within the statutory definition of a "record” *(see,*Public Officers Law § 86 [4]; *Matter of Washington Post Co. v New York State Ins. Dept.*61 NY2d 557, 565). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolf, J. — dismiss complaint, summary judgment.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Green, Balio and Schnepp, JJ.
#### John Karagianis et al., Respondents, v City of Yonkers, Appellant.

— In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for false arrest and wrongful death, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Stolarik, J.), dated February 19, 1986, as granted the plaintiffs’ motion to renew the defendant’s motion for a protective order with respect to items Nos. 12, 13, 15, 16 and 19 in a notice of discovery and inspection dated October 17, 1983, and, upon renewal, granted the plaintiffs’ motion for discovery of those items.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs, and the defendant’s time to comply with the plaintiffs’ notice for discovery and inspection dated October 17, 1983, is extended until 20 days after service upon it of a copy of this decision and order, with notice of entry.

Under the circumstances, Special Term did not err when it granted the plaintiffs’ motion for renewal, and, upon renewal, granted them discovery with respect to items Nos. 12, 13, 15, 16 and 19 in their notice for discovery and inspection dated October 17, 1983 *(see,*CPLR 3101 [g]; *Miranda v Blair Tool & Mach. Corp.,*114 AD2d 941; *Matos v Akram & Jamal Meat Corp.,*99 AD2d 527; *Pataki v Kiseda,*80 AD2d 100, *lv dismissed*54 NY2d 606). Mangano, J. P., Brown, Lawrence, Weinstein and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Inherited Disease Research Access Committee CIDR.                    

*Date:*                         November 5, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         11:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Suite 3100, Room 3185, Bethesda, MD 20892-6908 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Barbara J. Thomas, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Suite 3100, Room 3185, Bethesda, MD 20892-6908,  301-402-8837,                         *barbara.thomas@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.172, Human Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 15, 2021.

David W. Freeman, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-20374 Filed 9-20-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### RB Hempstead, LLC, Appellant, v Incorporated Village of Hempstead et al., Respondents.

Submitted April 16, 2007;

decided June 12, 2007

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal as against the *1020Incorporated Village of Hempstead Community Development Agency, dismissed upon the ground that as to that party the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal as against the Incorporated Village of Hempstead, denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 22-0165

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

BRUCE SCHRODER,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Peter B. Ohman, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 10 2024

01/10/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0165
#### In the Matter of James Melvin Lee, Appellant, v Judith S. Kaye, as Judge of the Court of Appeals, et al., Respondents.

Submitted June 4, 2007;

decided June 12, 2007

*1019Appeal, insofar as taken from that part of the Appellate Division order that dismissed the petition, dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that as to that part of the order no substantial constitutional question is directly involved; appeal, insofar as taken from that part of the Appellate Division order that denied appellant’s motion for poor person relief, dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.

Chief Judge Kaye taking no part.
**EXHIBIT      32**

**CERTIFICATE      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND **

**PRINCIPAL      FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE **

**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

|  | 1. | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial results of operations of the                  Company. |
|--|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                                                                       |   |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Alan                    Doyle                                                                                                                                                     |   |   |   |
|                                                                                                                                                                                            |   |   |   |
| Alan                      DoylePresident                      (Chief Executive Officer),Treasurer                      (Principal Financial Officer)November                      29, 2005 |   |   |        |
****
 **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**
 **OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Emeritus Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly Report), I, Daniel R. Baty, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 
 1.
The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and 
 2.
The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 
 
 
 /s/ Daniel R. Baty
 Daniel R. Baty
 Chief Executive Officer
 January 27, 2005
EXHIBIT 32

1350 CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Shirley Singleton, the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Edgewater Technology, Inc. (the Company), and Timothy R. Oakes, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each
hereby certifies that, to the best of her or his knowledge:

The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2010, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the Periodic Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                              
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: March 31, 2011 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ SHIRLEY SINGLETON                                                        
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Shirley Singleton                                                            
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: March 31, 2011 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ TIMOTHY R. OAKES                                                         
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Timothy R. Oakes                                                             
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)         

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.