alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2009164EN.01003901.xml

| 26.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 164/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 164/39

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 557/2009

of 25 June 2009

on the allocation of import rights for applications lodged for the period 1 July 2009 to 30 June 2010 under tariff quotas opened by Regulation (EC) No 412/2008 for frozen beef intended for processing

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 of 31 August 2006 laying down common rules for the administration of import tariff quotas for agricultural products managed by a system of import licences (2) and in particular Article 7(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 412/2008 of 8 May 2008 opening and providing for the administration of an import tariff quota for frozen beef intended for processing (3) opened import tariff quotas for beef and veal products. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 412/2008 of 8 May 2008 opening and providing for the administration of an import tariff quota for frozen beef intended for processing (3) opened import tariff quotas for beef and veal products.

| (2) | The applications for import rights lodged for the period 1 July 2009 to 30 June 2010 relate to quantities in excess of those available for rights under quota 09.4057. The extent to which import rights may be granted should therefore be determined and the allocation coefficient to be applied to the quantities requested should be laid down, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The applications for import rights lodged for the period 1 July 2009 to 30 June 2010 relate to quantities in excess of those available for rights under quota 09.4057. The extent to which import rights may be granted should therefore be determined and the allocation coefficient to be applied to the quantities requested should be laid down,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Applications for import rights lodged for the period 1 July 2009 to 30 June 2010 under Regulation (EC) No 412/2008 shall be weighted by an allocation coefficient of 18,957513 % for rights under quota 09.4057.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 26 June 2009.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 June 2009.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 13.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 125, 9.5.2008, p. 7.

3

---
#### Sweeney, Cohn, Stahl & Vaccaro, et al., Respondents-Appellants, v George Kane et al., Appellants-Respondents, et al., Defendant.

Submitted December 4, 2006;

decided February 15, 2007

Motion and cross motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Judge Jones taking no part.
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Thomas X. Geisel                                              |   | /s/ Robert B. Crowl                                                               |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Thomas X. Geisel                                                  |   | Robert B. Crowl                                                                   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer |   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer) |

----
# C_2021448EN.01000301.xml

| 5.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 448/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 448/3

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 and Council Regulation (EU) 2016/44, concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation of Libya apply

(2021/C 448/02)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 16 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1).

The legal basis for this processing operation are Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 (2) as implemented by Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2021/1910 (3), and Council Regulation (EU) 2016/44 (4), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1909 (5) concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya.

The controller of this processing operation is the Department RELEX.1.C in the Directorate-General for Foreign Affairs, Enlargement and Civil Protection - RELEX of the General Secretariat of the Council (GSC), that can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1.C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1.C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The GSC’s Data Protection Officer can be contacted at:

Data Protection Officer data.protection@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 as implemented by Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2021/1910, and Regulation (EU) 2016/44, as implemented by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1909.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil the listing criteria as laid down in Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 and Regulation (EU) 2016/44.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the statement of reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the restrictive measures or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Without prejudice to any judicial, administrative or non-judicial remedy, data subjects may lodge a complaint with the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 (edps@edps.europa.eu).

---

(1)  OJ L 295, 21.11.2018, p. 39.

(2)  OJ L 206, 1.8.2015, p. 34.

(3)  OJ L 389 I, 4.11.2021, p. 3.

(4)  OJ L 12, 19.1.2016, p. 1.

(5)  OJ L 389 I, 4.11.2021, p. 1.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-26-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         63,996
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,766,264
<ALLOWANCES>                                   350,171
<INVENTORY>                                    2,727,160
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5,765,024
<PP&E>                                         6,756,388
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3,560,915
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 9,058,406
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          8,716,680
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    2,341,420
<COMMON>                                       49,328
<OTHER-SE>                                     7,625,560
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   9,058,406
<SALES>                                        12,302,665
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               12,302,665
<CGS>                                          10,117,355
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  10,117,355
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3,549,164
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             497,756
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,861,610)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,861,610)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,861,610)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.17)


</TABLE>
Listen

# Victoria Nourse

## Commission Vice Chair

Political Affiliation: Democrat Term Ends: December 2028

-  Our Mission 
-  Commissioners 
-  Offices and Staff 
-  Careers 
-  Acquisition Opportunities 
-  Rankin Memorial Library 
-  FAQs
# CI2021406EN.01000401.xml

| 8.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 406/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 406/4

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2021/C 406 I/03)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

| Date and time of closure | 15.8.2021 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 15.8.2021 - 31.12.2021 |
| Member State | Italy |
| Fishing effort group code | EFF2/MED2_TR2 |
| Stock group | Giant red shrimp in GSAs 9, 10 and 11 |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | Vessels with overall length ≥ 12 m and < 18 m |
| Reference number | 15/TQ90 |

Date and time of closure

15.8.2021

Duration

15.8.2021 - 31.12.2021

Member State

Italy

Fishing effort group code

EFF2/MED2_TR2

Stock group

Giant red shrimp in GSAs 9, 10 and 11

Type(s) of fishing vessels

Vessels with overall length ≥ 12 m and < 18 m

Reference number

15/TQ90

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

---
BILLY J. WILLIAMS, OSB #901366 

United States Attorney 

District of Oregon 

KATHLEEN L. BICKERS, OSB #85151 

Assistant United States Attorney 

Kathleen. bickers@usdoj.gov 

1000 SW Third Ave., Suite 600 

Portland, OR 97204-2902 

Telephone: (503) 727-1000 

Attorneys for United States of America 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

v. 

ANN M. PATRICK, 

Defendant. 

6:16-CV-00131-KI 

STATUS REPORT 

The United States of America, by Billy J. Williams, United States Attorney for the 

District of Oregon, and through Kathleen L. Bickers, Assistant United States Attorney, hereby 

files a status report in the above captioned case. 

A complaint was filed in this matter on January 25, 2016 .. The parties have been in 

contact and the government accepted an offer of compromise on March 25, 2016. Pursuant to 

the agreement, a partial payment was received on April 13, 2016 and the final payment is due no 

later than August 24, 2016. The defendant has signed a Consent Judgment which is held by the 

government to be filed only if defendant should default on the compromise agreement and miss 

the August 24, 2016 deadline for final payment. 

Case 3:16-cv-00131-KI Document 6 Filed 07/05/16 Page 1 of 3
Upon receipt of the timely final payment, the government will file a Motion to Dismiss 

Complaint with prejudice. 

Dated this 

Status Report 

Respectfully submitted, 

BILLY J. WILLIAMS 

United States Attorney 

KATHLEEN L. BICKERS, OSB #85151 

Assistant United States Attorney 

Page2 

Case 3:16-cv-00131-KI Document 6 Filed 07/05/16 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I have made service of the foregoing Status Report on 

defendant by causing to be mailed at Portland Oregon, on July __ , 2016, a full copy, enclosed 

in an envelope with postage thereon prepaid, addressed to: 

Milly Whatley 

Attorney at Law 

2445 NE Division Street, Suite 202 

Bend, OR 97701 

Counsel for Defendant 

Status Report Page3 

Case 3:16-cv-00131-KI Document 6 Filed 07/05/16 Page 3 of 3
# C_2021480EN.01000401.xml

| 29.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 480/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 480/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10474 – NESTE / RAVAGO / JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 480/04)

On 16 November 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10474. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10474. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
PAGE 1 – ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

HAROLD ALEXANDER FOWLKES,

Plaintiff,

v.

OTSUKA AMERICA 

PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 3:16-cv-658-SI

ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT 

AGREEMENT

Dana L. Sullivan and Matthew Scherer, BUCHANAN ANGELI ALTSCHUL & SULLIVAN LLP,

321 S.W. Fourth Avenue, Suite 600, Portland, OR 97204. Of Attorneys for Plaintiff.

Amy Joseph Pedersen, Laura E. Rosenbaum, and Ryan S. Kunkel, STOEL RIVES LLP,

760 S.W. Fifth Avenue, Suite 2600, Portland, OR 97205; and John R. Ates, ATES LAW FIRM, 

P.C., 1800 Diagonal Road, Suite 600, Alexandria, VA 22314. Of Attorneys for Defendant.

Michael H. Simon, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Harold Alexander Fowlkes, brought this suit alleging, among other claims,

failure to pay overtime in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 

et. seq. The parties have reached a confidential settlement agreement and have filed a joint 

motion asking the Court to approve their settlement and dismiss this action. ECF 14.

Case 3:16-cv-00658-SI Document 18 Filed 08/08/16 Page 1 of 2
PAGE 2 – ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Generally, an employee may not waive or bargain away his or her rights under the FLSA. 

Brooklyn Sav. Bank v. O’Neil, 324 U.S. 697, 706 (1945). Therefore, “FLSA claims may not be 

settled without approval of either the Secretary of Labor or a district court.” Seminiano v. Xyris 

Enter., Inc., 602 F. App’x 682, 683 (9th Cir. 2015) (citing Nall v. Mal–Motels, Inc., 723 F.3d 

1304, 1306 (11th Cir. 2013)). A district court may approve settlement of a FLSA claim “after 

scrutinizing the settlement for fairness.” Nall, 723 F.3d at 1306 (quoting Lynn’s Food Stores, 

Inc. v. U.S. By & Through U.S. Dep’t of Labor, Emp’t Standards Admin., Wage & Hour Div., 

679 F.2d 1350, 1353 (11th Cir. 1982)). A district court may approve an agreement only upon 

finding that it is “a fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute over FLSA provisions.” 

Id. at 1355.

The Court has reviewed the parties’ confidential settlement agreement, filed under seal. 

ECF 17. The Court also notes that both sides are represented by capable counsel with extensive 

experience in the areas alleged in the Complaint.

The Court GRANTS the parties’ Joint Motion for Stipulated Dismissal and Court 

Approval of Settlement Agreement (ECF 14). Judgment will be entered accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 8th day of August, 2016.

/s/ Michael H. Simon

Michael H. Simon

United States District Judge

Case 3:16-cv-00658-SI Document 18 Filed 08/08/16 Page 2 of 2
#### In the Matter of Sharod Baker, Petitioner, v Brian Fischer, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

[946 NYS2d 909]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner was charged in two misbehavior reports with violating the prison disciplinary rules prohibiting possession of contraband (two counts) and possession of an altered item. At the tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner pleaded guilty to all three charges. However, the Hearing Officer, upon review of the proof, found petitioner not guilty of one of the charges of possession of contraband. The determination was affirmed following administrative review, prompting the commencement of this proceeding.*

We confirm. Initially, we find no error in considering, at a single hearing, more than one misbehavior report *(see Matter of Hernandez v Goord,*268 AD2d 727 [2000]), especially where, as in this case, the alleged incidents are directly related. Additionally, we find no support in the record for petitioner’s contention that the determination should be annulled because the Hearing Officer failed to separately assess the evidence with respect to each misbehavior report.

Petitioner’s remaining contentions, including his claim that respondent’s answer was untimely served *(see Matter of Jones v Coughlin,*125 AD2d 883 [1986]), have been examined and found to be unpersuasive.

Peters, P.J., Spain, Malone Jr., Kavanagh and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

*

 Assuming, arguendo, that petitioner is correct that this proceeding was improperly transferred because he did not intend to raise a substantial evidence issue, we disagree that remittal to Supreme Court is required. Under such circumstances, we generally “retain jurisdiction and address the merits in the interest of judicial economy” *(Matter of Barone v Prack,*92 AD3d 999, 999 n [2012]).
#### In the Matter of Robert Remillard, Petitioner, v City of Watervliet, Respondent.

— Weiss, J.

On November 26, 1983, petitioner, a firefighter employed by the City of Watervliet, Albany County, was involved in a motor vehicle collision at the intersection of 4th Street and 5th Avenue in the city while responding to a first aid call in an emergency vehicle. As a result of this incident, respondent’s General Manager brought charges pursuant to Civil Service Law § 75 alleging that petitioner "failed to exercise reasonable care in the use of motor equipment”. After a *913hearing in March 1984, the Hearing Officer found that petitioner’s conduct was unreasonable as charged and recommended that he be reprimanded and fined $100. The General Manager adopted this recommendation in its entirety and this proceeding ensued.

Our inquiry is whether the determination is supported by substantial evidence *(Matter of Faure v Chesworth,*111 AD2d 578). The record established that petitioner was driving an emergency vehicle en route to a distress call at the time of the accident, and that the emergency flashing lights and siren had been activated. Pursuant to Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1104 (b) (2), petitioner was authorized to proceed through the intersection, which was controlled by stop signs facing traffic on 4th Street, "but only after slowing down as may be necessary for safe operation”. Petitioner, who was driving westbound along 4th Street, acknowledged that he entered the intersection at approximately 10 miles per hour without having first stopped, and that he never saw the other vehicle before impact. As demonstrated in the extensive factual findings made by the Hearing Officer, a vehicle approaching this intersection from petitioner’s direction enjoys only a very limited view of traffic on 5th Avenue. While petitioner testified that he looked both ways along 5th Avenue before entering the intersection, the General Manager had ample basis to conclude that petitioner failed to obtain an unobstructed view of oncoming trafile and that he should have stopped *(see,*Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1104 [e]; *Stanton v State of New York,*29 AD2d 612, 613, *affd*26 NY2d 990). That petitioner may not have received formalized training from his employer as to the operation of an emergency vehicle does not alleviate the failure to exercise due care in approaching the intersection. Considering the circumstances, the penalty was clearly not disproportionate to the offense. Accordingly, the determination should be confirmed.

Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Weiss, Yesawich, Jr., and Levine, JJ., concur.