alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001018751
<NAME> OCEANSIDE GOLF MANAGEMENT CORP.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,456
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  360,865
<ALLOWANCES>                                    32,977
<INVENTORY>                                     63,667
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               298,041
<PP&E>                                       6,412,653
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,147,076
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,767,549
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          201,862
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,531,217
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,767,549
<SALES>                                        838,377
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,481,974
<CGS>                                          309,740
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,715,764
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 8,790
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,302
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                792,608
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            792,608
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   792,608
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

UNITED STATES COAST GUAR"D,

Complainant,

ALAN SELDON,

Respondent.

Docket Number 2023-0043

Enforcement Activity No. 7633371

ADMISSION ORDER

Issued: February 9. 2023

Bv Administrative Law Judse: Honorable Timothv G. Stueve

Appearances:

William Taylor

Sector Honolulu

For the Coast Guard

Alan Seldon, pro se

For Respondent
On or about February 8,2023, the United States Coast Guard (USCG or Coast Guard),

filed a Complaint against Alan Seldon (Respondent) alleging one count ofviolation of

misconduct under 46 U.S.C. $ 7703(1)(8) and 46 C.F.R. $ 5.27.

ln the Complaint, the Coast Guard alleges:

1. On January 29, 2023, Respondent was employed by NCL, PRIDE OF AMERICA,

and subject to their policies.

2. On Jantary 29, 2023, NCL, PRIDE OF AMERICA had a policy prohibiting

employees being onboard the vessel with a blood alcohol level (BAC) above 0.04.

3. On January 29,2023, Respondent failed an alcohol breath test with a reading of0.256,

in violation of NCL, PRIDE OF AMERICA'S drug and alcohol policy.

4. Respondent's failed breath alcohol test raises the presumption ofmisconduct, as

described by 46 U.S.C. $ 7703(1XB) and defined by 46 C.F.R. $ 5.27.

Based on these facts, the Coast Guard proposes three (3) months outright suspension of

Respondent's Merchant Mariner Credential (MMC).

On or about February 8,2023, Respondent hled his Answer, admittting to all

jurisdictional and factual allegations as stated in the Complaint. Respondent also agreed to the

proposed order ofthree (3) months outright susponsion, with no additional conditions stipulated.

Upon consideration of the record, I hereby FIND that the allegations in the Complaint are

PROVED BY ANSWER. I find that on January 29,2023, Respondent cornmitted an act of

misconduct, as described by 46 U.S.C $ 7703(l)(B) and defined by 46 C.F.R. $ 5.27.

SANCTION
I have carefully reviewed the Complaint and Answer and find that the proposed sanction

is appropriate under the provisions of46 C.F.R. $ 5.569.

WIIEREFORE,

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDER-ED, Respondent's Coast Guard issued MMC is suspended

outright for three (3) months, commencing on the date Respondent's MMC is deposited with

USCG Sector Honolulu.

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, service of this decision on the pa(ies and/or parties'

representative(s) serves as notice ofappeal rights set forth in 33 C.F.R. $$ 20.1001 - 20.1004.

(Attachment A).

Done and dated February 9,

Alameda, Califomia

2023, at

Timothy G. Stueve

Administrative Law Judge

U.S. Coast Guard
|   | 1. | The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |    /s/  Daniel R. Baty |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|   | Daniel R. Baty                                  |
|   | Co-Chief Executive Officer                      |
|   | November 9, 2009                                |
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

November 5, 2008

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 07-15754

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 07-00118-CR-T-24-MSS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus

WILLIAMSON DIMANCHE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(November 5, 2008)

Before TJOFLAT, ANDERSON and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
Ray Lopez, counsel for Williamson Dimanche, has filed a motion to

withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Dimanche has

filed a document that we have construed as a motion for an extension of time to

file a supplemental reply to the Anders motion. Our independent review of the

entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is

correct. Dimanche was able to file a response to counsel’s brief raising several

issues of alleged arguable merit. Because independent examination of the entire

record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Dimanche’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. Because

Dimanche had opportunity to file an extensive response to counsel’s motion, his

motion for an extension of time to file a supplemental reply is DENIED.

2
# C_2021234EN.01000301.xml

| 17.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/3

---

Commission information notice pursuant to article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 234/03)

| Member State | Spain |
| --- | --- |
| Concerned route | Menorca-Madrid |
| Period of validity of the contract | From 1 November 2021 to 30 April 2022 and from 1 November 2022 to 30 April 2023 |
| Deadline for submission of tenders | 2 months following the date of publication of this notice |
| Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained | Ministerio de Transportes, Movilidad y Agenda Urbana |
| Dirección General de Aviación Civil |
| Subdirección General de Transporte Aéreo |
| Paseo de la Castellana 67 |
| 28071 Madrid |
| ESPAÑA/SPAIN |

Member State

Spain

Concerned route

Menorca-Madrid

Period of validity of the contract

From 1 November 2021 to 30 April 2022 and from 1 November 2022 to 30 April 2023

Deadline for submission of tenders

2 months following the date of publication of this notice

Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained

Ministerio de Transportes, Movilidad y Agenda Urbana

Dirección General de Aviación Civil

Subdirección General de Transporte Aéreo

Paseo de la Castellana 67

28071 Madrid

ESPAÑA/SPAIN

Tel. +34 915977837

Fax +34 915978643

Email: osp.dgac@mitma.es

---
#### FOY, Respondent, v. DIXON, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fifth Department.

January 18, 1894.)

Action by Aurelia Foy against Maud L. Dixon, administratrix, etc.

No opinion. Judgment appealed from affirmed, with costs.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion *

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-40319

Summary Calendar

OLEGARIO PUGA-OLMOS,

Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; BUREAU OF PRISONS,

Defendants - Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

No. 1:08-CV-362

Before DeMOSS, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Olegario Puga-Olmos (Puga), federal prisoner # 39505-037, filed suit for

damages and injunctive relief, pursuant Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents

of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and the Federal Tort Claims

Act (FTCA), asserting that the United States of America and the Bureau of

Prisons had acted with deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs and

negligently with regard to the treatment of his injured shoulder. Puga has not

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 30, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 09-40319

2

shown that the district court erred in concluding that Puga could not assert a

claim for damages against the defendants under Bivens, as those parties were

not individuals. See Bivens, 403 U.S. at 395-97; Affiliated Prof’l Home Health

Care Agency v. Schalala, 164 F.3d 282, 286 (5th Cir. 1999). Nor has he shown

that the district court erred in determining that the FTCA claim was premature

because Puga had not exhausted his administrative remedies prior to the

institution of the action. See McNeil v. United States, 508 U.S. 106, 111-12

(1993); 28 U.S.C. § 2675(a) (2006). 

Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See Howard v. King,

707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. The dismissal of this

appeal as frivolous counts as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba

v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). We CAUTION Puga that if

he accumulates three strikes under § 1915(g), he will not be able to proceed in

forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or

detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical

injury. See §1915(g).
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Sheila Moore, Appellant.

Present— Dillon, P. J., Green, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM UNISON'S
UNAUDITED  CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS FOR THE 9 MOS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1998  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO  SUCH  CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          3,825
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  44,329
<ALLOWANCES>                                    9,195
<INVENTORY>                                     2,285
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               47,894
<PP&E>                                         34,648
<DEPRECIATION>                                  8,969
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                190,592
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          42,739
<BONDS>                                       170,694
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            5
<OTHER-SE>                                    (48,020)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  190,592
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              147,721
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 127,826
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               19,916
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                3,218
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             10,742
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,981)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (13,981)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,981)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group; NHLBI Single-Site and Pilot Clinical Trials Study Section.                    

*Date:*                         October 27-28, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         YingYing Li-Smerin, M.D., Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Room 207-P, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, 301-827-7942,                         *lismerin@nhlbi.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 8, 2021.

David W. Freeman,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-19760 Filed 9-13-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 24, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-60126

Summary Calendar

 

ASTER MARIA NOOR MASIH,

Petitioner,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

--------------------

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A95 537 679

--------------------

Before JONES, BARKSDALE and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Aster Maria Noor Masih petitions for review of an order by

the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the decision of

the Immigration Judge (IJ) to deny her application for asylum and

withholding of removal under the Immigration and Nationality Act

and her claim for withholding of removal under the Convention

Against Torture (CAT). Noor argues that the IJ erred in finding

that her testimony was not credible. She argues further that she

is entitled to asylum and withholding of removal because she will
No. 04-60126

-2-

be subjected to persecution and torture based on her religious

beliefs and activities if she is returned to Pakistan.

Where, as here, the BIA summarily affirms without opinion

and essentially adopts the IJ’s decision, we review the IJ’s

decision. See Efe v. Ashcroft, 293 F.3d 899, 903 (5th Cir.

2002). The IJ articulated cogent reasons, supported by

substantial evidence in the record, for rejecting Noor’s

testimony as lacking credibility. See Chun v. INS, 40 F.3d 76,

79 (5th Cir. 1994). The record does not compel reversal of the

IJ’s adverse credibility determination and his concomitant

determination that Noor has not carried her burden of proving her

entitlement to asylum, withholding of removal, or relief under

the CAT. See Efe, 293 F.3d at 907; Girma v. INS, 283 F.3d 664,

666-67 (5th Cir. 2002).

Because the IJ’s finding that Noor’s testimony was not

credible is sufficient grounds for affirming the BIA’s decision,

we need not reach the IJ’s alternative ruling. See Chun, 40 F.3d

at 79.

PETITION DENIED.
Exhibit 10.27a

Hot Topic Inc., Director Compensation 2006

On March 17, 2006, our Board of Directors,
following approval of our Compensation Committee, established the following 2006 director compensation:

Cash Compensation:



|                                  |  |                          |  |                      |       |                
|--------------------------------- |  | ------------------------ |  | -------------------- | ----- | ---------------
|MEETINGS                          |  | NO. OFMEETINGS (FY 2005) |  | PER MTG.FEE(FY 2006) |      
|Board                             |  | 4                        |  |                      |       |                
|Chair                             |  |                          |  | $                    | 7,000 |                
|Member                            |  |                          |  | $                    | 5,000 |                
|                                  |  |                         
|Audit Committee                   |  | 6                        |  |                      |       |                
|Chair                             |  |                          |  | $                    | 2,500 | (+$10,000/Qtr.)
|Member                            |  |                          |  | $                    | 1,500 |                
|                                  |  |                         
|Governance & Nominating Committee |  | 4                        |  |                      |       |                
|Chair                             |  |                          |  | $                    | 2,500 |                
|Member                            |  |                          |  | $                    | 1,000 |                
|                                  |  |                         
|Compensation Committee            |  | 3                        |  |                      |       |                
|Chair                             |  |                          |  | $                    | 2,500 |                
|Member                            |  |                          |  | $                    | 1,000 |                

Other Compensation:

Automatic Options:



|                                          |  |               
|----------------------------------------- |  | --------------
|New Director Grant (0 in FY 2005):        |  | 10,000 options
|Continuing Director Grant (5 in FY 2005): |  | 2,500 options 
|Continuing Chair Grant (1 in FY 2005):    |  | 3,750 options 

Discretionary Options:

Continuing Director Grant (5 in FY 2005): The number of shares which will, including the automatic grant, provide a $60,000 aggregate grant, using the Black Scholes model.

Continuing Chair Grant (1 in FY 2005): The number of shares which will, including the automatic grant, provide an $80,000 aggregate grant, using the
Black Scholes model.

Stock Bonus Award:

Director Award (5 in FY 2005): The number of shares equal to $25,000 divided by the share price determined as of the date of grant.

Chair Award (1 in FY 2005): The number of shares equal to $30,000 divided by the share price determined as of the date of grant.
CONSE NT ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

On or about March7,2023, the parties in this case submitted a Motion for Approval of

Settlement Agreement and Entry ofConsent Order to be approved as a settlement of the case

under 33 C.F.R. $ 20.502.

I have carefully reviewed the terms of the Settlement Agreement and find it is fair and

reasonable and in substantial compliance with the requirements of33 C.F.R. $ 20.502.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the record, it is hereby ORDERED, the Settlement Agreement is

APPRO\aED in full and incorporated herein by reference. This Consent Order shall constitute

full, final, and complete adjudication of this proceeding.

Done and dated March 2l , 2023 , at

Alameda, Califomia

Timothy G. Stueve

Administrative Law Judge

U.S. Coast Guard
1 The Honorable Thomas C. Mummert, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 07-2376

___________ William G. Carter, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Eastern District of Missouri. * Alan Blake, C.O.O., MSOTC; Janine * [UNPUBLISHED] Semar, Recreation Director, MSOTC, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: May 8, 2008 Filed: May 13, 2008

___________ Before BYE, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. William Carter appeals the district court’s 1 denial of his motion for postjudgment relief in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________