alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Raymond Bell, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (De Lury, J.), imposed September 6, 1983, convicting him of attempted grand larceny in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed *(see, People v Pellegrino,*60 NY2d 636; *People v Harris,*61 NY2d 9). Mangano, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2639 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for additional qualification 

requirements for individuals appointed to marriage and family therapist 

positions in the Veterans Health Administration of the Department of 

Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 3, 2015 

Mr. PETERS (for himself, Mr. TAKANO, Ms. BORDALLO, Ms. BROWNLEY of 

California, Mr. GIBSON, and Mrs. NAPOLITANO) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for additional qualification requirements for individuals appointed to marriage and family therapist positions in 

the Veterans Health Administration of the Department 

of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Marriage and Family 

5 Therapists for Veterans Act’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2639 IH

1 SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR 

2 MARRIAGE AND FAMILY THERAPISTS OF THE 

3 DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 7402(b)(10) of title 38, 

5 United States Code, is amended— 

6 (1) in subparagraph (A)— 

7 (A) by inserting ‘‘that is regionally accred8 ited or’’ before ‘‘approved’’; and 

9 (B) by striking ‘‘; and’’ and inserting a 

10 semicolon; 

11 (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period 

12 and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

13 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub14 paragraph: 

15 ‘‘(C) have passed— 

16 ‘‘(i) the Association of Marital and 

17 Family Therapy regulatory board examina18 tion in marital and family therapy; or 

19 ‘‘(ii) an examination for a marriage 

20 and family therapy license given by a State 

21 board of behavioral sciences or its equiva22 lent.’’. 

23 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

24 subsection (a) shall apply to the appointment of an indiVerDate Sep 11 2014 07:21 Jun 04, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2639.IH H2639

smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2639 IH

1 vidual to a marriage and family therapist position on or 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) announces June 1, 2000, as the deadline for each airport sponsor to have on file with the FAA an acceptable fiscal year 2000 grant application for funds apportioned to it under the AIP.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Stan Lou, Manager, Programming Branch, Airports Financial Assistance Division, Office of Airport Planning and Programming, APP-520, on (202) 267-8809.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Section 47105(f) of Title 49, United States Code, provides that the sponsor of each airport to which funds are apportioned shall notify the Secretary by such time and in a form as prescribed by the Secretary, of the sponsor's intent to apply for the funds apportioned to it (entitlements). Notifications of the sponsor's intent to apply during fiscal year 2000 for any of its available entitlement funds including those unused from prior years, shall be in the form of a project application submitted to the cognizant FAA Airports office no later than June 1, 2000.

This notice is promulgated to expedite and prioritize grants in the final quarter of the fiscal year. Absent an acceptable application by June 1, 2000, FAA will defer an airport's entitlement funds until the next fiscal year. Pursuant to the authority and limitations in section 47117(f). FAA will issue discretionary grants in an aggregate amount not to exceed the aggregate amount of deferred entitlement funds. Airport sponsors may request unused entitlements after September 30, 2000.

Issued in Washington, DC on April 11, 2000.

D. Cameron Bryan,

Acting Manager, Programming Branch.

[FR Doc. 00-9550  Filed 4-14-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
#### Joseph M. Smith et al., Appellants, v Community Board No. 14 et al., Respondents.

Appeal by the plaintiffs from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered September 6, 1985.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, for reasons stated by Justice Goldstein at Special Term. Brown, J. P., Rubin, Lawrence and Hooper, JJ., concur. [128 Misc 2d 944.]
#### In the Matter of D’Ornellas v Ortiz.

— Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted, as indicated, and this court’s order entered on November 18, 1986 [124 AD2d 1078] vacated. Concur — Sandler, J. P., Carro, Asch, Kassal and Rosenberger, JJ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JOE NATHAN WOMACK, Plaintiff,
v. Civil Action No. JOYCE CHILES, et

## at., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION 

# FILED NOV 302009 Clerk, U.S. District and Bankruptcy Courts 

# 09 2263

This mattercomes before the Court on plaintiffs application to proceed informa pauperis andpro se complaint. The application will be granted and the complaint will be dismissed. Plaintiff"was indicted and convicted on (2) counts ofarmed robbery" inthe Circuit Court ofLeFlore County, Mississippi. CompI. at 6 (page numbers designated by the Court); see id., Attach. (Indictment). According to plaintiff, the Assistant District Attorney conspired with his appointed defense counsel to effect his unlawful incarceration. Id. at 4. He asks this Court "to vacate [the]judgement [sic] ofconviction and [to] release[] [him] from unconstitutional[] confinement." Id. at 6. It appears thatplaintiffintends to challenge his Mississippi conviction and sentence, and such a challenge properly is brought under 28 U.S.C. 

### § 2254. This provision directs a federal court to "entertain an application for a writ ofhabeas corpus in behalfofa person in custody pursuant to thejudgment ofa State court only onthe ground that he is in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties ofthe United States." 28 U.S.C. 

### § 2254(a). Plaintiffmay

1bring such an application only "inthe district court for the district wherein such person is in custody orin the district court for the district within whichthe States court was held which convicted and sentenced him[.]" 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (d). Assuming without deciding that plaintiff meets all other prerequisites for consideration ofhis application under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice as it is improperly addressedto this court instead ofa federal district court in Mississippi. See, e.g., Bates v. Lampton, No. 09-0735,2009 WL 1073195, at *2 (D.D.C. Apr. 22, 2009) (construing the complaint inpart as a request to reduce plaintiffs sentence and dismissing it in part onthe ground that it should have been brought in another federal district court); McLaren v. UnitedStates, 2 F. Supp. 2d48,50 n.3 (D.D.C. 1998) (noting that habeas petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 should be brought in district in which prisoners are incarcerated). An Order consistent withthis Memorandum Opinion will be issued separately onthis
same date.

# ~~,~ Date: \ \ \

## '2)01

# O~ United States District Judge

2
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 74 (Monday, April 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 20440]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9480]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL99-92-001]


MidAmerican Energy Company; Notice of Filing

April 11, 2000.
    Take notice that on March 31, 2000, MidAmerican Energy Company 
(Midamerican), 666 Grand Avenue, 2900 Ruan Center, Des Moines, Iowa 
50309, tendered for filing amendments to Network Integration 
Transmission Service Agreements with the Municipal Electric Utility of 
Waverly, Iowa (Waverly); the City of Denver, Iowa (Denver); the City of 
Sergeant Bluff, Iowa (Sergeant Bluff); the City of Genesco, Illinois 
(Genesco); and MidAmerican, as wholesale merchant; and amendments to 
Firm Transmission Service Agreements with the City of Eldridge, Iowa 
(Eldridge); the Ames Municipal Electric System (Ames); Northwest Iowa 
Power Cooperative (NIPCO); and Alliant Energy Corporation (Alliant).
    MidAmerican states that the amendments have been filed pursuant to 
Section II.B.1 of the Offer of Settlement approved by the Commission in 
Docket No. EL99-92-000 on March 17, 2000.
    MidAmerican requests an effective date of January 1, 2000 for each 
of the amendments and a waiver of the Commission's notice requirement.
    Copies of the filing were served on Waverly, Denver, Sergeant 
Bluff, Geneseo, Eldridge, Ames, NIPCO, Alliant, the Iowa Utilities 
Board, the Illinois Commerce Commission, the South Dakota Public 
Utilities Commission and all parties to Docket No. EL99-92-000.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before April 21, 2000. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be 
taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-9480 Filed 4-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Secure Computing Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John E. McNulty, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                   
|                                                                   
|/s/ John E. McNulty                                                
|                                                                   
|John E. McNulty Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer April 30, 2004
# CI2021139EN.01000101.xml

| 20.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 139/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 139/1

---

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2013/184/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/639, and in Council Regulation (EU) No 401/2013, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/638 concerning restrictive measures against Myanmar/Burma

(2021/C 139 I/01)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in Annex I to Council Decision 2013/184/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/639 (2), and in Annex IV to Council Regulation (EU) No 401/2013 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/638 (4) concerning restrictive measures against Myanmar/Burma.

The Council of the European Union, after having reviewed the list of designated persons, has decided that the persons that appear in the above-mentioned Annexes should continue to be included in the list of persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2013/184/CFSP and Regulation (EU) No 401/2013 concerning restrictive measures against Myanmar/Burma. The grounds for the listing of the persons concerned appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 401/2013 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Myanmar/Burma, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4b of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned lists should be reconsidered, before 1 November 2021, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1.C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1.C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council's periodic review, in accordance with Article 12 of Decision 2013/184/CFSP and Article 4i(4) of Regulation (EU) No 401/2013.

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council's decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 111, 23.4.2013, p. 75.

(2)  OJ L 132 I, 19.4.2021, p. 12.

(3)  OJ L 121, 3.5.2013, p. 1.

(4)  OJ L 132 I, 19.4.2021, p. 1.

---
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I,Mark P. Mellin, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ILEX Oncology, Inc;

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
| Date: August 14, 2003 |
|-----------------------|
|                  | /s/ Mark P. Mellin |   |
|                  | Mark  P. Mellin |   |
|                  | Senior  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                  | (Chief  Financial and Accounting Officer) |   |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 74 (Monday, April 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20440-20441]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9473]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL00-67-000]


Strategic Power Management, Inc., Complainant, v. New York 
Independent System Operator, Respondent; Notice of Filing

April 11, 2000.
    Take notice that on April 10, 2000, Strategic Power Management, 
Inc. (SPM) filed against the New York Independent System Operator, a 
Complaint Requesting Fast Track Processing and Motion to Consolidate.
    A copy of this filing was serviced upon all persons parties 
reasonably believed to have an interest herein or be affected thereby 
in accordance with 18 CFR 385.206(c).
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions or 
protests must be filed on or before April 21, 2000. Protests will be 
considered by the

[[Page 20441]]

Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person 
wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may also be 
viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 
202-208-2222) for assistance. Answers to the complaint shall also be 
due on or before April 21, 2000.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-9473 Filed 4-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 11

                              THERMO FIBERGEN INC.

                          Computation of Loss per Share


                                           1996           1995          1994
                                   ------------   ------------   -----------
   Computation of Primary
     Loss per Share:

   Net Loss (a)                    $  (367,000)   $   601,000    $  (128,000)
                                   -----------    -----------    -----------

   Shares:
     Weighted average shares
       outstanding                  11,321,236     10,000,000     10,000,000

     Add: Shares issuable from
          assumed exercise of 
          options (as determined
          by the application
          of the treasury stock
          method)                       36,451         72,902         72,902
                                   -----------    -----------    -----------

     Weighted average shares
       outstanding, as adjusted
       (b)                          11,357,687     10,072,902     10,072,902
                                   -----------    -----------    -----------

   Primary Loss per Share
     (a) / (b)                     $      (.03)   $     (.06)    $      (.01)
                                   ===========    ===========    ===========