alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.2


            CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Edwin Tharp, Chief Financial Officer of International
Dispensing Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the period ended
          December 31, 2002, which this certification accompanies, fully
          complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the Report.






  March 31, 2003                                       /s/ Edwin Tharp
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Edwin Tharp
                                                       Chief Financial Officer


                                       70
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

January 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 129289 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 129289 

 COA: 258676 
 Wayne CC: 93-012011

DWAYNE EDWARD JONES,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 24, 2005 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT the Wayne County Prosecuting 

Attorney to answer the defendant’s application for leave to appeal, including the issue of 

whether defendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on the question whether he is 

entitled to a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence. 

The application for leave to appeal remains pending. 

KELLY, J., would remand this case to the Wayne Circuit Court for an evidentiary 

hearing. 

d0120 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 27, 2006 

Clerk
EGL, INC.







Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of EGL, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  May 10, 2005

By:

/s/ James R. Crane

_____________________

James R. Crane

Chief Executive Officer

Date:  May 10, 2005

By:

/s/ Elijio V. Serrano

_____________________

Elijio V. Serrano

Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to EGL, Inc. and will be retained by EGL, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2021154EN.01000201.xml

| 30.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 154/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 154/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10214 — Clearlake/TA Associates/Precisely)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 154/02)

On 23 April 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10214. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10214. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
### IN THE UNI TED STATES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCUIT

No. 11-40693 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. ANGEL ANTONIO CAMACHO, also known as Angel Antonio Camacho Arciga, Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:10-CR-1166-1
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, GARZA, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * 

### Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Angel Antonio Camacho raises arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Betancourt , 586 F.3d 303, 308-09 (5th Cir. 2009), which reaffirmed the holding in United States

v. Gamez-Gonzalez , 319 F.3d 695, 700 (5th Cir. 200 3 ) , that knowledge of drug type and quantity i s not an element of the offense under 21 U.S.C. § 841. The ap pellant’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s F i ft h C i rc u i t 

## F I L E D Februa ry 17 , 20 12 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5 , the court hasd ete rm inedthat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 11-40693 Document: 00511761477 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/17/2012
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20 2 3

- 2770

_____________________________
R ICHARD A UGUSTUS P ATE , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Walton County

. Kelvin C. Wells , Judge

. April 2, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , R OWE , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Richard Augustus Pate
, pro se , Appellant.2 Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee

.
From: <ENGLISHJ98@aol.com> 

To: <steffenflyrod@lycos.com> 

Date: 1/24/2006 11:55:03 AM 

Subject: Lees Ferry Fishing Conditions 

Dear Mark Steffen& Bill Persons 

I just wanted to drop you a line about the current fishing conditions at Lees Ferry. I wish I could be in 

better sprits about this but, here it is. As you know, fishing was not good thru the steady flows of Sept & 

Oct (no drift), but with the arrival of the higher flows it has become as bad as I can ever remember. It is 

equal to the disaster of the early 90's. Myself along with the rest of the guides here are searching and 

exhausting everything within our inventory of knowledge to catch 1 to 3 fish per client per day. The 

flyfishing has always suffered first, but lately the spin fisherman's experience has been the same, this is 

new, also very scary. With the lower water on Sundays we have had slightly better results, but let me 

quantify this, I mean just slightly. My hope, and I do believe the fishing will improve somewhat with the 

coming of lower flows in March, however we are asking this ecosystem to mount a recovery like it has 

never been asked to do before. With all the challenges before us, Insufficient dissolved oxygen, Zero 

available food for fish due to steady flows, New Zealand Mudsnails consuming the nutrients of the food 

base, and food base destruction from experimental floods, in our future, I wonder how many more 

hurdles Lees Ferry can endure. I guess my message to you is that we are at rock bottom now, I only 

hope you can convey this to the TWG & AMWG. Our business is now at 50% of what it was 5 years ago, 

three of our guides have moved on in the last 6 months, two other outfitters have quit completely. Marble 

Canyon Lodge is now closed Mon-Thur, for the first time ever. 

We have always cooperated with our votes at both the TWG & AMWG meeting's to do the experimental 

flows and floods, all of it to try and help them understand this complicated resource. I think it is now time 

for them to try and understand ours, and show some mercy upon it with their decisions about the 

detrimental effects included within future experimental flows, or else we may loose it all. Bill, have you 

any input from the shocking in Dec? Does it reflect what we are seeing? What about the fish density, 

condition, size? I am aware of what you are facing and sympathize with all the restraints placed upon 

your ability to deal with this problem. As you know, I have personally witnessed how hard both of you 

work to defend the Ferry, but Bill & Mark I think we need to push harder for science to get into the 

Bentho's and begin understanding the foundation of the food chain. In closing, I ask that you inform them 

we are on our last legs as a recreational resource, known around the world, with an uncertain future. 

Thanks for your time and help to our cause, and I wish you both good luck at the meetings this week. 

Jeff English, Fishing Guide & 

 Owner Cliff dwellers Lodge
**RB** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 1 - 0476 IN THE MATTER OF: G.M., Respondent and Appellant. **GRANT OF EXTENSION** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is gran ted an extension of time to and including January 2 1 , 202 3 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court December 14 2022

12/14/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0476
Listen

# U. S. Commission on Civil Rights to Release Report:  The Federal Response to Anti-Asian Racism in the United States

August 30, 2023

On Wednesday, September 27, 2023, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights will release its 2023 statutory enforcement report, *The Federal Response to Anti-Asian Racism in the United States*. The report examines the federal government’s role in documenting, prosecuting, and preventing hate crimes against persons of Asian descent during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The report will be available in full on the Commission’s website at https://www.usccr.gov/reports/annual-statutory-enforcement on Wednesday, September 27, 2023, at 12 pm Eastern time. For more information on the March briefing and to view written testimony visit: https://www.usccr.gov/meetings/2023/03-24-federal-response-anti-asian-racism-united-states.  

 

Save the Date

-  All News 
-  Commission News 
-  Advisory Committees News 
-  Correspondence 
-  Videos 
-  Archives
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 22, 2017.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, June 22, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17A1611. ROBERT C. MARIGNA v. AUDRY SWIFT WILBURN, AS EXECUTRIX 

OF THE ESTATE OF DELIA M. SWIFT.

The appellant in this case failed to comply with the notice of docketing mailed by this 

Court and with Court of Appeals Rules 22 (a) and 23 (a), regarding the filing of an enumeration 

of errors and brief within twenty days after the appeal was docketed. See also Court of Appeals 

Rule 13.

On May 16, 2017, this Court ordered the appellant to file an enumeration of errors and a 

brief no later than May 25, 2017. As of the date of this order, the appellant's enumeration of 

errors and brief still have not been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is deemed abandoned and is 

hereby ordered DISMISSED. Court of Appeals Rules 7, 23 (a).
# C_2021463EN.01001401.xml

| 16.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 463/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 463/14

---

Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)

(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1))

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 463/13)

Decision granting an authorisation

| Reference of the decision (2) | Date of decision | Substance name | Holder of the authorisation | Authorisation number | Authorised use | Date of expiry of review period | Reasons for the decision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| C(2021) 7874 | 9 November 2021 | 4-(1,1,3,3-Tetra methylbutyl)phenol, ethoxylated
  (4-tert-OPnEO)
  EC No: -, CAS No:- | Janssen Vaccines & Prevention B.V., Archimedesweg 4, 2333 CN Leiden, Netherlands | REACH/21/4/0 | Lysing agent for the permeabilisation of the host cell membrane to release adenovirus particles used for the manufacture of vaccines, allowing the selective elimination of enveloped adventitious viruses, compatible with the chemicals needed to control the host cell DNA precipitation in the next process step | 4 January 2033 | In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment from the uses of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies. |
| Janssen Biologics B.V. Einsteinweg 101, 2333 CB Leiden, Netherlands | REACH/21/4/1 |

Reference of the decision (2)

Date of decision

Substance name

Holder of the authorisation

Authorisation number

Authorised use

Date of expiry of review period

Reasons for the decision

C(2021) 7874

9 November 2021

4-(1,1,3,3-Tetra methylbutyl)phenol, ethoxylated

(4-tert-OPnEO)

EC No: -, CAS No:-

Janssen Vaccines & Prevention B.V., Archimedesweg 4, 2333 CN Leiden, Netherlands

REACH/21/4/0

Lysing agent for the permeabilisation of the host cell membrane to release adenovirus particles used for the manufacture of vaccines, allowing the selective elimination of enveloped adventitious viruses, compatible with the chemicals needed to control the host cell DNA precipitation in the next process step

4 January 2033

In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment from the uses of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies.

Janssen Biologics B.V. Einsteinweg 101, 2333 CB Leiden, Netherlands

REACH/21/4/1

---

(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006 , p. 1.

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: Authorisation (europa.eu)

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v *488James Francis, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Ingrassia, J.), rendered September 7, 1982, convicting him of robbery in the first degree upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Weinstein, Kunzeman and Spatt, JJ., concur.
Listen

# Commission Sends Letter to USCIS about Backlog of Naturalization Applications

September 11, 2020

Letter to USCIS

-  All News 
-  Commission News 
-  Advisory Committees News 
-  Correspondence 
-  Videos 
-  Archives
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2021392EN.01000301.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 28.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/3 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10375 — ArcelorMittal/Condesa Tubos)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 392/03)

1.

On 13 September 2021, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 and following a referral pursuant to Article 4(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2021392EN.01000301-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | ArcelorMittal Aceralia Basque Holding, S.L. (‘ArcelorMittal’, Spain), a subsidiary of ArcelorMittal, S.A. (‘ArcelorMittal Group’, Luxembourg) |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Condesa Tubos, S.L. (‘Condesa Tubos’, Spain). |

ArcelorMittal acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Condesa Tubos.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for ArcelorMittal and the ArcelorMittal Group: mining, manufacturing and distribution of various steel products to the automotive, construction, energy, packaging, appliances, and mining and by-products industries. |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for Condesa Tubos: manufacture of different types of small welded carbon steel tubes in three sites in Spain and one site in Germany. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2021392EN.01000301-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10375 — ArcelorMittal/Condesa Tubos

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2021392EN.01000301-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2021392EN.01000301-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 28, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 132540(90)(92) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, BERO MOTORS, INC., Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 132540 COA: 257675 Delta CC: 98-014256-CK GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for rec onsideration of this Court's February 1, 2008 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously. The motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED.

M ARKMAN , J., would grant reconsid eration and, on recons ideration, would grant leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in Justice Corrigan’ s dissenting statement in this case, 480 Mich 1053 (2008).

d0421 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 28, 2008

Clerk
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7624

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WADE BROOKS BEST, JR., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (CR-95-62-FO, CA-01-98-4-FO) Submitted: January 31, 2002 Decided: February 8, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wade Brooks Best, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. J. Frank Bradsher, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Wade Brooks Best, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate ofappealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Best , Nos. CR-95-62-FO; CA-01- 98-4-FO (E.D.N.C. July 10, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED