alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         216,936
<SECURITIES>                                 5,698,210
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,877,977
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,203,659
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,431,014
<PP&E>                                      32,994,918
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,792,450
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              41,986,518
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,289,857
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        82,079
<OTHER-SE>                                  37,431,981
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                41,986,518
<SALES>                                      5,804,142
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,261,126
<CGS>                                        4,279,132
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,440,827
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (85,102)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (551,583)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (189,466)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (362,117)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)
        

</TABLE>
#### Norma Elizabeth GONZALEZ-RAMIREZ, aka Rosario Moreno-Garcia, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-73779.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 28, 2011.

John D. Friedman, Friedman & Ikon, Tarzana, CA, for Petitioner.

Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Eric Warren Marsteller, Esquire, Trial, Oil, Jonathan Aaron Robbins, Esquire, Trial, Daniel Eric Goldman, Esquire, Senior Litigation Counsel, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

*685Before: FARRIS, LEAVY and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Norma Elizabeth Gonzalez-Ramirez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for asylum.1 We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the Board’s denial of asylum and withholding of removal because Gonzalez-Ramirez failed to show her alleged persecutors threatened her on account of a protected ground. Her fear of future persecution based on having brothers who are gang members is not on account of the protected ground of membership in a particular social group. *See Arteaga v. Mukasey,*511 F.3d 940, 944-46 (9th Cir.2007) (holding that neither current nor former gang members constitute a particular social group). Any fear of future persecution based on Gonzalez-Ramirez’s resistance to attempted gang recruitment is not on account of the protected ground of either membership in a particular social group or political opinion. *Ramos Barrios v. Holder,*581 F.3d 849, 854-56 (9th Cir.2009).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

1

. Petitioner did not challenge the denial of withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6174

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

GEORGE CHARLES KALIVRETENOS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Judge. (1:15-cr-00073-AJT-1; 1:19-cv-01552-

AJT)

Submitted: June 16, 2020 Decided: June 19, 2020

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Charles Kalivretenos, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

George Charles Kalivretenos seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as 

untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2018) motion. See Whiteside v. United States, 775 F.3d 

180, 182-83 (4th Cir. 2014) (en banc) (explaining that § 2255 motions are subject to oneyear statute of limitations, running from latest of four commencement dates enumerated in 

28 U.S.C. § 2255(f)). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2018). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2018). When, as here, the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a 

constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. 

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Kalivretenos has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Curtis Middlebrooks, Appellant, v James Conway, as Superintendent of Attica Correctional Facility, Respondent.

Submitted January 8, 2007;

decided March 27, 2007

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 74 (Monday, April 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 20492]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9469]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Experts' Meeting on Burnup Credit in Spent Fuel Shipping Casks

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a meeting to 
develop a Phenomena Identification and Ranking Table (PIRT) for 
allowing burnup credit in spent fuel shipping casks. PIRTs have been 
used at NRC since 1988, and they provide a structured way to obtain a 
technical understanding that is needed to address certain issues. About 
fifteen of the world's best technical experts are participating in this 
activity, and the experts represent a balance between industry, 
universities, foreign researchers, and regulatory organizations. The 
PIRT activity is addressing technical issues related to burnup credit 
in the criticality safety analyses of PWR spent fuel in transport 
casks.

DATE: May 16-18, 2000, 8:30 am-5:30 pm.

ADDRESSES: Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Hearing Room (T3B45) 
of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
MD.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting agenda will be posted on the NRC 
Web site at www.nrc.gov/RES/meetings.html by May 1, 2000. The meeting 
is open to the public. Attendees will need to obtain a visitor badge at 
the TWFN building lobby, but an escort is not required.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. David Ebert, SMSAB, Division of 
Systems Analysis and Regulatory Effectiveness, Office of Nuclear 
Regulatory Research, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001, telephone (301) 415-
6501; email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8ce8e8e9cce2feefa2ebe3fa"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="25414140654b57460b424a53">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 11th day of April 2000.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Charles E. Rossi,
Director, Division of Systems Analysis and Regulatory Effectiveness, 
Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research.
[FR Doc. 00-9469 Filed 4-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-50912, 333-88313, and 333-106325 on Form S-8 of our report (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and contains an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes  an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, effective January 1, 2007 and the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), Share-based Payment, effective January 1, 2006) dated March 17,
2008, relating to the financial statements of Edgewater Technology, Inc., and our report dated March 17, 2008 related to the effectiveness of Edgewater Technology, Inc.s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Edgewater Technology, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
|Boston, Massachusetts    
|March 17, 2008
EXHIBIT 28
                                                                      ----------

SMITH, GOOLSBY,
ARTIS & REAMS, P.S.C.

CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
P.O. BOX 551         1330 CARTER AVE.
ASHLAND, KENTUCKY  41105-0551
(606) 329-1171   FAX (606) 325-0590

Board of Directors
Classic Bancshares, Inc.

                         INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT

We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated statement of condition as of June
30, 2002 and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive
income for the three month period ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, and cash flows
for the three month periods ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, in accordance with
Statement on Standards for Accounting and Review Services issued by the American
Institute of Certified Accountants. The financial statements are the
responsibility of the corporation's management.

A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying
analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons
responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in
scope than an audit conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the
financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an
opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying financial statements for them to be in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America, the consolidated statement of
financial condition as of March 31, 2002, and the related consolidated
statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders' equity and cash flows
for the year then ended (not presented herein) and in our report dated June 11,
2002, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial
statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying
consolidated statement of financial condition as of March 31, 2002, is fairly
stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated statement of
financial condition from which it has been derived.



/S/ SMITH, GOOLSBY, ARTIS & REAMS, P.S.C.
SMITH, GOOLSBY, ARTIS & REAMS, P.S.C.
Ashland, Kentucky
August 12, 2002
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1




                         INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT



We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-21585, 333-23937, 333-39817, 333-43586, 333-43588, 333-56772, 333-56774,
333-67881, 333-71890 and 333-101600 of Lightbridge, Inc., all on Form S-8, of
our report dated March 15, 2004 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Lightbridge, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Watham, Massachusetts
March 15, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 74 (Monday, April 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20474-20475]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9437]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: May 5, 2000.
    Time: 8:30 AM to 3:00 PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Holiday Inn Gaithersburg, The Washington Room, 2 
Montgomery Village Avenue, Gaithersburg, MD 20879.
    Contact Person: Vassil S. Georgiev, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, NIAID, NIH, Room 2217, 6700-B Rockledge Drive, MSC, 
7610, Bethesda, MD 20892-7610, 301-496-2550.


[[Page 20475]]


(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)


    Dated: April 7, 2000.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-9437 Filed 4-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
EXHIBIT
4(4)


  


STATE OF ISRAEL

MINISTRY OF FINANCE


 


OFFICE OF THE LEGAL ADVISOR


 


June 30, 2021


 


Ministry of Finance


Government of Israel


1 Kaplan Street


Hakiriya, Jerusalem 91008


ISRAEL


 


Re: Registration Statement of the State of
Israel on Schedule B


 


Dear Sirs:


 


I, Legal Advisor to the Ministry
of Finance of the State of Israel (“Israel”), have reviewed the above referenced Registration Statement on Schedule B (the
 “Registration Statement”), filed on the date hereof with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”)
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”), including the Prospectus constituting a part thereof (including
any amendments or supplements thereto, the “Prospectus”), and the Master Underwriting Agreement and Master Fiscal Agency Agreement,
including, in each case, the extensions, amendments and supplements thereto (collectively, the “Agreements”), filed as exhibits
to the Registration Statement, pursuant to which Israel proposes to issue and sell certain debt securities (the “Bonds”).


 


The issuance of the Bonds
has been authorized pursuant to the State Property Law of Israel.


 


It is my opinion that when
the Bonds have been duly authorized, issued and executed by Israel and authenticated, paid for and delivered as contemplated by the Agreements
and the Prospectus, the Bonds will constitute valid and legally binding direct and unconditional obligations of Israel under and with
respect to the present laws of Israel.


 


I hereby consent to the filing
of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration Statement and to the use of my name under the heading “Validity of the Bonds”
in the Prospectus forming a part of the Registration Statement. In giving the foregoing consent, I do not thereby admit that I am in the
category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Act or the rules and regulations of the Commission thereunder.
I also consent to the reliance on this opinion by White & Case LLP as to any matter relating to the laws of Israel, in connection
with any opinion required to be filed with or delivered to the Commission or to the Development Corporation for Israel.


 


	 	Very
    truly yours,
	 	 
	 	/s/
    Asi Messing
	 	 
	 	Asi
    Messing
	 	The
    Legal Advisor to the Ministry of Finance
	 	Government
    of Israel




 






    1
U.S. D EPA RT MENT OF

HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. COAST GUARD

C G- 4111 ( Rev. 6-04)

DEMAND ON CARRIER/CONTRACTOR

(Submit an original and three copies typed if practicable)

See CLAIMS MANUAL Enclosure (4)

1. DATE

2. TO: (Name & address of Carrier/Contractor) 3. GOVERNMENT BILL OF LADING NO./CONTRACT NO.

4. CARRIER BILL OF

LADING NO.

BAGGAGE CHECK NO. MAC FLIGHT NO.

5. TO: (Name & address of Warehouse if shipped from nontemporary

storage) SHIPMENT IN NONTEMPORARY STORAGE

6. FROM 7. TO

8. LOT NO. 9. SERVICE ORDER NO.

10. CLAIM IS PRESENTED FOR (Check appropriate box)

LOSS DAMAGE IN CONNECTION WITH THE FOLLOWING SHIPMENT OF:

HOUSEHOLD GOODS BAGGAGE OTHER: (Specify)

11. AMOUNT OF CLAIM

12. ORIGIN TRANSPORTATION OFFICE 13. SHIPMENT LOADED 14. DATE

15. DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION OFFICE 16. SHIPMENT DELIVERED 17. DATE

18. A DESCRIPTION OF THE ITEMS LOST OR DAMAGED IS ON PAGE 2

AND ON ADDITIONAL PAGE(S).

19. NET WEIGHT OF SHIPMENT

20. REMARKS

21. SEND REPLY TO: (Office monitoring my claim) 22. CLAIMANT (Name, grade and signature)

PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE
�������������������

�������������������

�������������������

Page 2 of CG-4111 (Rev. 6-04) 

23. DEMAND 

a. 

INVENTORY NUMBER 

b. 

DESCRIPTION 

OF ITEM 

c. 

NATURE AND EXTENT 

OF DAMAGE OR LOSS 

d. 

EXCEPTIONS 

NOTED 

e. 

DATE OF 

PURCHASE 

AND PURCHASE 

PRICE 

f. 

REPLACEMENT COST 

OR COST OF REPAIR 

g. 

APPROXIMATE 

WEIGHT 

h. 

CARRIER/

CONTRACTOR 

LIABILITY 

i. 

CARRIER/

CONTRACTOR 

RECOVERY 

j

DEPRECIATION 

CHECK IF BLOCK 23. IS CONTINUED AND ENTER SUB-TOTALS CHECK IF BLOCK 23. IS NOT CONTINUED AND ENTER TOTALS 

REMARKS
# C_2021459EN.01002001.xml

| 12.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 459/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 459/20

---

EUROPEAN FOOD SAFETY AUTHORITY

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2020

(2021/C 459/20)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/corporate-pubs/efsa-annual-accounts-2020

---
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

_________________________________

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

Complainant

vs.

JOHN BARRY JOHNSON, JR.

Respondent

_________________________________

Docket Number: 2023-0279

Enforcement Activity Number: 7730378

ORDER GRANTING COAST GUARD’S NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL AND CONSENT 

ORDER APPROVING AMENDED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

This matter comes before me on the United States Coast Guard’s (Coast Guard) Notice of 

Withdrawal of Settlement Agreement (Notice of Withdrawal) and Motion for Approval of 

Settlement Agreement and Entry of Consent Order (Motion for Approval),

1

filed on September 

28, 2023. In its Notice of Withdrawal, the Coast Guard seeks to withdraw the settlement 

agreement submitted with the Coast Guard’s initial Motion for Approval of Settlement 

Agreement and Entry of Consent Order (Initial Motion), filed on August 16, 2023. In its Motion 

for Approval, the Coast Guard requests I issue a consent order approving the amended settlement 

agreement, which incorporates modifications pursuant to my September 26, 2023 Order

Memorializing Pre-Hearing Conference. 

1 On September 29, 2023, the Coast Guard filed a second Motion for Approval of Settlement Agreement and Entry 

of Consent Order (Second Motion for Approval) and Certificate of Service (COS). The COS for the Second Motion 

for Approval corrected a clerical error in the COS filed on September 28, 2023. Apart from the certificates, the 

motions and attached settlement agreements are identical. As such, I will rule on the Motion for Approval filed on 

September 28, 2023, and will disregard the Second Motion for Approval filed on September 29, 2023. In the future, 

the parties are advised that non-substantive, clerical errors in certificates of service may be corrected through a 

notice accompanied by an amended certificate of service as an attachment. Refiling an identical copy of the motion 

is not necessary. 
Turning to the Notice of Withdrawal, I note the Coast Guard does not expressly withdraw 

the Initial Motion, but only seeks to withdraw the previously filed settlement agreement. I will 

construe the Notice of Withdrawal as a motion requesting withdrawal of the Initial Motion. 

Having done so, I GRANT the Coast Guard’s request. 

I now turn to the Motion for Approval. Having carefully reviewed the request and terms 

of the amended settlement agreement, I find it is fair, reasonable, and in substantial compliance 

with the requirements of 33 C.F.R. § 20.502.

WHEREFORE,
ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, the Coast Guard’s Notice of Withdrawal is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, the Motion for Approval is GRANTED and the 

Settlement Agreement is APPROVED in full and incorporated herein by reference. This 

Consent Order shall constitute full, final, and complete adjudication of this proceeding.

Done and dated this October 19, 2023,

at Baltimore, Maryland

Hon. Lineka N. Quijano 

Administrative Law Judge 

United States Coast Guard
John W. Thomas, Partner

 1100 Norwood Tower | 114 West 7th St | Austin, Tx 78701

 512.495.1400 | FAX 512.499.0094 | Jthomas@gbkh.com | WWW.GBKH.COM

October 21, 2015 

 

Via Electronic Filing

Third Court of Appeals 

209 West 14th Street, Room 101 

Austin, Texas 78701 

Re: Court of Appeals No. 03-14-00515-CV; Salvatore Magaraci and Estate 

Protection Planning Corporation v. Espinosa, in his capacity as Receiver of 

Retirement Value, LLC

Dear Clerk: 

In accordance with the Court’s notice of October 8, 2014, this letter will serve as 

notification that John W. Thomas, attorney for Appellee Eduardo Espinosa, Receiver of 

Retirement Value, LLC, in the above-referenced case, will be presenting oral argument 

before the court on November 18, 2015 at 1:30 p.m. 

 

If you have any questions, please call me at (512) 495-1407. 

 Yours sincerely,

George, Brothers, Kincaid & Horton, LLP 

 

 /s/ John W. Thomas 

John W. Thomas

 Counsel for Appellee, Eduardo S. Espinosa 

 In his Capacity as Receiver for Retirement 

Value, LLC

JWT/ejg

cc: Timothy A. Hootman, Counsel for Defendants (Via Electronic Service)

Client

ACCEPTED

03-14-00515-CV

7481820

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

10/21/2015 4:02:13 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 10/21/2015 4:02:13 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk