alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Hon. Tommy B. Cantrell

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Houston, Texas

Department of Homeland Security 

United States Coast Guard

In May 2023, the Honorable Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary of Homeland 

Security, appointed Judge Tommy B. Cantrell to serve as a United States Coast 

Guard Administrative Law Judge (ALJ). As an ALJ, Judge Cantrell hears and 

decides Coast Guard Suspension and Revocation cases and disputes from 

various other agencies as assigned by the Office of Personnel and 

Management. Judge Cantrell’s chambers are in Houston, Texas, and his 

primary area of responsibility covers the states along the Gulf of Mexico. 

Judge Cantrell is a 2006 graduate of the University of Kentucky, magna cum 

laude, and a 2009 graduate of Loyola New Orleans College of Law, cum 

laude. While at Loyola, he served on the Moot Court Board as the Selection 

Committee Chairman and authored Going Overboard: The Ninth Circuit 

Forces Seaman to Walk the Plank of Arbitration in Rogers v. Royal Caribbean 

Cruise Line, published in the Loyola Maritime Law Journal. 

After receiving his juris doctor, Judge Cantrell received a Master of Laws in 

Admiralty and Maritime from Tulane School of Law. While at Tulane, Judge 

Cantrell was named the 2009-2010 Admiralty and Maritime Fellow and was a 

member of the Tulane Maritime Law Journal. He received his LL.M. with 

honors in 2010. 

After law school, Judge Cantrell clerked on the Kentucky Supreme Court for 

the Honorable William Thompson Scott. After his clerkship, Judge Cantrell 

joined Houck Anderson in Miami, Florida, a boutique law firm concentrating 

on admiralty and maritime law in the Fifth and Eleventh Circuit Courts of 

Appeal. Judge Cantrell then served as a Trial Commissioner for the 35th 

District of Kentucky. 

In 2014, the Chief ALJ of the Coast Guard selected Judge Cantrell as an 

attorney advisor, where he served for nearly a decade. In this role, Judge 

Cantrell advised numerous ALJs, attended countless in-person hearings, and 

traveled throughout the continental United States in support of the Office of 

the Chief Administrative Law Judge.
1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

Complainant

vs.

EVAN VERNON RICHARDS

Respondent.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket Number: 2023-0385

MISLE Activity ID: 7775051

WITHDRAWAL FROM DOCKET

The Coast Guard initiated an administrative proceeding by filing a Complaint on October 26, 

2023, seeking a suspension of Respondent’s Merchant Mariner Credential.

On November 30, 2023, the Coast Guard filed a Notice of Withdrawal from docket as:

Respondent completed a Voluntary Surrender Agreement under 46 C.F.R. 5.203.

This matter is removed from the docket and closed without prejudice effective this date. The 

Coast Guard reserves the right to file a new Complaint in this matter.

Done and Dated December 05, 2023 at 

Baltimore, MD

____________________________

Lauren Meus

Hearing Docket Clerk

U.S. Coast Guard

By Direction of the Chief Administrative Law Judge
# C_2021311EN.01000201.xml

| 3.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10157 — Aurubis/TSR Recycling/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 311/02)

On 21 April 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10157. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10157. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 182 (Thursday, September 23, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 52943]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-20589]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #17119 and #17120; California Disaster Number CA-
00340]


Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for the 
State of California

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of California (FEMA-4610-DR), dated 08/24/
2021.
    Incident: Wildfires.
    Incident Period: 07/14/2021 and continuing.

DATES: Issued on 09/18/2021.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/25/2021.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/24/2022.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the State of California, dated 08/24/2021, is hereby 
amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the 
disaster:

Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans): Tehama, 
Trinity.
Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):
    California: Glenn, Humboldt, Mendocino, Siskiyou.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2021-20589 Filed 9-22-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
#### Patrick Myers v. The State.

Where no notice is taken of the demurrer, it is presumed to be abandoned. There being no statement of facts, no question can arise on the merits.

Appeal from Henderson. The case was tried before Hon. Reuben A. Reeves, one of the district judges.

*174The indictment was for assault and battery.

No brief for the appellant was furnished to the *Reporter.*

*JE. B. Turner, Attorney General,*for the state.

Galdwell, J.

—The defendant filed several exceptions to the indictment, which were never called to the attention of the court. A trial and conviction were had, and judgment entered, from which this appeal was taken. . The failure of the defendant to ask the ruling of the court below on his exceptions is equivalent to a waiver: (State v. Thompson, 18 Tex., 528; Chambers v. Miller, 9 Tex., 236.)

No question can arise on the merits,, because there is no statement of facts. (Henderson v. Trimble, 8 Tex., 174; Sublett v. Kerr, 12 Tex., 370.)

Dismissed.
#### David BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of HAWAII; Laura Thielen; Nancy McMahon, in her official capacity; Melanie Chinen, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-15000.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Feb. 16, 2011.

Filed March 25, 2011.

*643Mark Stanton Beatty, Ph. D., Tax Business and Da Kine, Kaneohe, HI, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Nancy Albano, Esquire, John M. Cregor, Jr., Esquire, Deputy Attorney General, Sonia Faust, Esquire, William Joseph Wynhoff, Deputy Attorney General Office of the Hawaii Attorney General, Honolulu, HI, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: TASHIMA, W. FLETCHER, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

David Brown appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the State of Hawaii, Melanie Chinen, and various defendants in their official capacities. We affirm.

Brown argues that Hawaii’s State Historic Preservation Division (“SHPD”) is violating the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, 24 U.S.C. § 3001 *et seq.,*by failing to properly inventory and care for Native Hawaiian human remains under its control. We agree with the district court that Brown did not meet the requirements for permanent injunctive relief because he did not demonstrate that he faced immediate or irreparable injury. *See G.C. & K.B. Invs., Inc. v. Wilson,*326 F.3d 1096, 1107 (9th Cir.2003); *Reno Air*
      *644
      *Racing Ass’n v. McCord,*452 F.3d 1126, 1137 n. 11 (9th Cir.2006).

Brown also argues that the State, and Chinen in her individual capacity, decided not to renew his contract in retaliation for his criticisms of the SHPD. Most of Brown’s speech was made “pursuant to his official duties” and was therefore unprotected under *Garcetti v. Ceballos,*547 U.S. 410, 126 S.Ct. 1951, 164 L.Ed.2d 689 (2006). Some of Brown’s speech was protected, but Brown failed to controvert Chinen’s declaration that she was unaware of the protected speech at the time she decided not to renew Brown’s contract. Therefore, Brown’s protected speech could not have motivated Chinen to retaliate against him. *See Keyser v. Sacramento City Unified Sch. Dist.,*265 F.3d 741, 751 (9th Cir.2001).

Finally, Brown appeals the award of attorney’s fees to the State and Chinen. Because Brown did not file a separate notice of appeal after the fee award was entered, we have no jurisdiction to review this claim. *Leslie v. Grupo ICA*198 F.3d 1152, 1160 (9th Cir.1999).

AFFIRMED; appeal from fee award DISMISSED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### BROOKLYN RAILWAY SUPPLY CO., Respondent, v. JAMAICA & B. ROAD CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

December 30, 1896.)

Action by the Brooklyn Railway Supply Company against the Jamaica & Brooklyn Road Company.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
#### James M. Hatcher v. L. A. Pelham, Administratrix.

Where cotton was delivered to a bailee to sell at a limited price in Confederate money, and the bailee, failing to get the price, converted it to his own use, the measure of damages (under the peculiar circumstances) was the value of the cotton at the time and interest upon that value until the trial.

Appeal from Panola. The ease was tried before Hon. M. D. Ector, one of the district judges.

*202The facts agreed on were as follows: The defendant was ntrusted with four hales of the plaintiff’s cotton, to carry it to Havasota and sell it for forty cents a pound in Confederate money. Failing to get the price, he deposited it in a warehouse, and drew thirty-six cents a pound on it for his own use, and the cotton was sold to indemnify this advance. It was a conversion, and the question was the measure of damages.

The jury returned a verdict of $60, and the plaintiff appealed. The error complained of was, that the court instructed the jury to find the value of the cotton at forty cents per pound, Confederate money, and then find the value of the Confederate money, which was proved to he less than six cents for a dollar.

*Thomas J. Jennings,*for appellant,

cited the rule in Pridgen v. Strickland, 8 Tex., 433. He insisted that the plaintiff was entitled to the highest price of the article at any time before trial. (Randon v. Barton, 4 Tex., 289; Leavitt v. McFaddin, 13 Tex., 324; Greening v. Wilkinson, 1 C. & P., 625; Corlelyon v. Lansing, 1 Caines’ Cases in Error, 215, and the cases there cited by Chancellor Kent.)

*W. R. Poag,*also for appellant.

Ho brief for appellee has been furnished to the *Reporter.*

Morrill, C. J.

—The plaintiff’s cause of action is alleged to be a disregard of the orders of plaintiff by defendant in the disposition of four bales of cotton placed in defendant’s hands by plaintiff to sell at a certain price, which defendant sold at a less price than the one agreed upon.

We see enough in the record to satisfy us that the judgment is erroneous. Under the peculiar cireumstancs of the case, we consider that the jury should be instructed to ascertain the value of the cotton in lawful money of the United *203States at the time the defendant sold it. And this sum, with interest upon the same from that time to the rendition of the judgment, should be their verdict.

Reversed and remanded.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,089,890
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,225,555
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,506,196
<PP&E>                                       1,094,561
<DEPRECIATION>                               (115,679)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,212,053
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          838,233
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        27,950
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,345,370
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,212,053
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,307,436
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,645,634
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                172,337
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   172,337
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of EGL, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:

August 9, 2006

By:

/s/ James R. Crane



James R. Crane

Chief Executive Officer

(principal executive officer)



Date:

August 9, 2006

By:

/s/ Charles H. Leonard



Charles H. Leonard

Chief Financial Officer

(principal financial officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to EGL, Inc. and will be retained by EGL, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Dismissed, Motion for Temporary Relief 

Denied as Moot, and Memorandum Opinion filed January 15, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-01013-CV

IN RE CHRISTOPHER SPATES, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

247th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2001-61475

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On December 29, 2014, relator Christopher Spates filed a petition for writ of 

habeas corpus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004); see 

also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to order his release 

from confinement in the Harris County Jail for contempt based on an order issued

by the 247th District Court of Harris County. Relator also filed with this court a 

motion for temporary relief. On December 29, 2014, relator asked this court to 
2

order his release from confinement, pending disposition by this court of relator’s 

petition for writ of habeas corpus, upon his posting of a bond. See Tex. R. App. P. 

52.8(b)(3), 52.10.

On January 8, 2015, relator filed a motion to dismiss his petition for writ of 

habeas corpus. We grant the motion and dismiss relator’s petition for writ of 

habeas corpus. We further deny as moot relator’s motion for temporary relief. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce and Wise.
2018 Student Art Contest Finalists

Dakota B, Grade 5., Cedar Road Elementary, Chesapeake, VA Daniela P., Grade 9, La Estancia School, Comayaguela, 

Francisco Morazan, Honduras

Danielle N., Grade 6, McDonogh School, Owings Mill, MD Deyanire Sarahi I., Grade 10, Cetmar #13 Taller de 

Habilidades Artisticas, Mexico

Graziella C., Grade 9, Carmel High School, Carmel, CA Hannah B., Grade 5, Blackrock Elementary School, Coventry, RI
Karolina K., Grade 12, Marine Academy of Science and 

Technology, Highlands, NJ

Tarikka A., Grade 5, Millstone River School, Plainsboro, 

NJ

2018 Student Art Contest Grand Prize Winners

Neema J., Grade 2, Bellows Spring Elementary School, 

Ellicott City, MD

Sofia N., Grade 3, Art Class by Irina Martynova, Houston, TX

Kaiya J., Grade 6, Mayfield Woods Middle School, Elkridge, MD Leonel L., Unidad Educative “Pedro Fermin Cevallos,” 

Ambato, Tungurahua, Ecuador
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk July 26, 2010

d0719 

# Order

July 26, 2010

141029

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141029 COA: 296616 Genesee CC: 07-020307-FH JAMES MICHAEL HOUCK, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the March 24, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 179 (Monday, September 20, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 52162]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-20280]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Minority Health and 
Health Disparities Special Emphasis Panel; NIMHD Support for 
Conferences and Scientific Meetings (R13).
    Date: October 27, 2021.
    Time: 2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Gateway Plaza, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20817 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Xinli Nan, M.D., Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Scientific Programs, National Institute on 
Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of 
Health, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
301-594-7784, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#772f1e191b1e5939161937191e1f59101801"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f6ae9f989a9fd8b89798b6989f9ed8919980">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 15, 2021.
David W. Freeman,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-20280 Filed 9-17-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Victor Santiago, Also Known as Juan Ramon Sanchez, Appellant.

With respect to the challenged alleged errors, we note that the defendant only objected to one comment in the prosecutor’s opening statement. This objection was sustained by the trial court and no further curative relief was requested by the defendant. The other alleged errors were not objected to by the defendant, and in light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt, we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.
GRANBY RESERVOIRLatitude: 40.16Longitude: -105.864Elevation: 8284

GRANBY RESERVOIR

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Never Summer Site Page...



Never Summer

Courtesy NRCS - Go to High Lonesome Site Page...



High Lonesome

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Sawtooth Site Page...



Sawtooth

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Bear Lake Site Page...



Bear Lake

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Lake Irene Site Page...



Lake Irene

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Phantom Valley Site Page...



Phantom Valley

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Stillwater Creek Site Page...



Stillwater Creek