alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Alejandro Franco, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Bronx County (Julio Rodriguez, III, J.), rendered November 9, 2016, after a nonjury trial, convicting him of attempted assault in the third degree, two counts of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, menacing in the third degree and harassment in the second degree, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Julio Rodriguez, III, J.), rendered November 9, 2016, affirmed.</p><p>The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (<i>see People v Danielson</i>, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis upon which to disturb the trial court's determinations concerning credibility, including its evaluation of inconsistencies in the testimony, the complainant's inability to recall minor details and her possible motivation to fabricate portions of her testimony. The court properly exercised its discretion in granting the People's request to amend the superseding information to correctly identify the deponent as complainant Yaritza Cortez (<i>see</i> CPL 170.35[1][a]), the individual who, in fact, signed said superceding information. In granting the amendment, the court correctly noted that the superseding information was obviously intended to be a "first party" information. </p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur <br>Decision Date: November 27, 2018<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-13-00490- CR NO. 03-13-00491- CR NO. 03-13-00492- CR NO. 03-13-00493- CR NO. 03-13-00495- CR

Ge rald Christopher Zuliani, Ap pellant

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 167 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT

NOS . D-1 -DC- 13- 9000 10, D- 1-DC- 13- 9000 11, D- 1-DC- 12- 1001 27,

D-1- DC-13 -90 0137 & D-1 -DC- 12- 9002 69 HO NORAB LE P . DAVID W ALB ERG, JUDGE P RESIDING

O R D E R

P ER CURIAM

Appellant’s brief on appea l was orig i n al l y d u e Dec ember 2, 2013. On counsel’s motion, the tim e for

filing w as extended to Fe bruar y 28, 2014. Appellant’s c ounsel has now f iled

a second motion re questing that the Court ext end the time f or filing appellant’ s brief an additional 30 day s. We g rant the motion for extension of time a nd order appellant to f

ile a brief no later than May 5, 2014. No further extension of time will be g rante d and failure to comply with this order will result in the ref

err al of this case to the trial court for a hear ing under Rule 38.8(b) of the Texas Rules of Appe llate Proce dure.I t is so ordered this 4th day of April, 2014.

Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Goodwin, and F ield

2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of : No. 161 DB 2022 (No. 11 RST 2023)

:

SUSAN IRENE STABLES : Attorney Registration No. 90652

:

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT :

FROM INACTIVE STATUS : (Out of State)

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 16th day of February, 2023, the Report and Recommendation of 

Disciplinary Board Member dated February 6, 2023, is approved and it is ORDERED that

SUSAN IRENE STABLES, who has been on Inactive Status, has demonstrated that she

has the moral qualifications, competency, and learning in law required for admission to 

practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a 

member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the 

investigation and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.
# C_2021486EN.01002201.xml

| 3.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 486/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 486/22

---

Notice for the attention of persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2012/642/CFSP, as implemented by Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2021/2125 and in Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2124 concerning restrictive measures against Belarus

(2021/C 486/04)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2012/642/CFSP (1), as implemented by Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2021/2125 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 (3) as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2124 (4), concerning restrictive measures against Belarus.

The Council of the European Union has decided that those persons should be included on the list or persons subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2012/642/CFSP and Regulation (EC) No 765/2006. The grounds for designations of those persons appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 765/2006, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 3 of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council before 31 December 2021, together with supporting documentation that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1.C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1.C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council’s periodic review, pursuant to Article 8(2) of Decision 2012/642/CFSP and Article 8a(4) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006, of the list of designated persons and entities.

---

(1)  OJ L 285, 17.10.2012, p. 1.

(2)  OJ L 430 I, 2.12.2021, p. 16.

(3)  OJ L 134, 20.5.2006, p. 1.

(4)  OJ L 430 I, 2.12.2021, p. 1.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This summary  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Company's  audited  financial  statements  dated  as of  June  30,  1997  and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          52,535,527
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      474,076
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,435,621
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  56,445,224
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              239,545
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           202,561
<OTHER-SE>                                      56,003,118
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    56,445,224
<SALES>                                             11,310
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,526,612
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,203,628
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,322,984
<INCOME-TAX>                                        14,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,308,984
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,308,984
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
#### Stern *et al.,*Respondents, *v.*Meiklehan, Appellant.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, Third Department.*

May Term, 1890.)

No opinion. Case dismissed on the ground that there is no valid appeal.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                      FIRST VIRTUAL HOLDINGS INCORPORATED
                STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        YEAR ENDED
                                             --------------------------------
                                             DECEMBER 31,        DECEMBER 31,
                                                 1997                1996
                                             ------------        ------------
<S>                                          <C>                 <C>
Net loss applicable to common shares         $(17,197,282)       $(10,689,940)

Common Stock                                    8,843,367           4,473,195

Conversion of Redeemable Preferred
  Stock into Common Stock                             ---           1,958,698
                                             ------------        ------------
Shares used in computing net loss
  per common share, basic and diluted           8,842,367           6,431,893
                                             ============        ============
Net loss per common share,
  basic and diluted                                $(1.94)             $(1.66)
                                             ============        ============
</TABLE>
#### John S. McNierney, Jr., Appellant, v Zara Contracting Company, Inc., et al., Respondents.

— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries arising from a motor vehicle accident, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Velsor, J.), entered November 13, 1985, as amended February 6, 1986, which is in favor of the defendants and against him, upon a jury verdict.

Ordered that the judgment, as amended, is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff contends that the court should have directed a verdict in his favor at the conclusion of the evidence or, not having done so, should have set aside the verdict of the jury in favor of the defendants as contrary to the weight of the evidence. Although this accident occurred while the defendant driver was making a left-hand turn across a traffic lane, under *457the facts and circumstances of this case, the verdict in favor of the defendants was not against the weight of the evidence *(see, Buemi v Mariani,*41 AD2d 1002). Based on this record it cannot be said that the jury could not have concluded that the defendant driver was not negligent on any fair interpretation of the evidence *(see, Nicastro v Park,*113 AD2d 129).

The plaintiffs contention that the jury disregarded the court’s instructions on the law is also without merit. Mangano, J. P., Brown, Weinstein and Spatt, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Reginald McFadden, Petitioner, v Albert Prack, Director, Special Housing/Inmate Disciplinary, Respondent.

[945 NYS2d 588]

Motion for reconsideration denied. Present — Scudder, P.J., Centra, Peradotto, Lindley and Martoche, JJ.
INSTRUCTION SHEET FOR THE PREPARATION OF A COMPLAINT

1. The caption should be in the following format:

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

PLAINTIFF’S NAME,

v. No.

THE UNITED STATES.

COMPLAINT

2. Plaintiff must file the original complaint along with a completed cover sheet (see Form 2, Appendix of 

Forms, Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC)). If filing a bid protest complaint, 

please see Appendix C, RCFC.

3. If filing in paper form, plaintiff must provide one copy of the complaint that includes an original 

signature. The complaint must be printed on letter-size paper with page numbers appearing in the 

bottom center margin of the page and must be bound along the left margin or in the upper left 

corner. The original complaint along with the filing fee must be mailed or hand delivered to:

Clerk, U.S. Court of Federal Claims 

717 Madison Place, NW, Room 103

Washington, DC 20439

4. For Attorneys Only:

If filing electronically via CM/ECF, please review the Attorney Guide for Filing

Complaints & Petitions in CM/ECF.

5. The complaint should identify the basis for the court’s jurisdiction and provide citations to the 

underlying statutes, regulations, or constitutional provisions that mandate the payment of money or 

other authorized relief. If the complaint seeks a refund of federal taxes, see RCFC 9(m) for additional 

pleading requirements.

6. The facts upon which claims are based must be set forth in concise form in numbered paragraphs. The 

concluding paragraph should set forth a demand for judgment against the United States in X number of 

dollars.

7. The original complaint must contain the plaintiff’s or the plaintiff’s attorney’s signature, name, address, 

telephone number, and date of signing and must be submitted along with the required filing fee(see Current 

Fee Schedule). If the plaintiff desiresto file without payment of this fee, a completed Application to

Proceed In Forma Pauperis must accompany the complaint.

8. Service on the United States will be made by the clerk, and the “Notice of Assignment” willshow the 

assigned docket number. For service requirements in a bid protest case, please see paragraphs 10 and 

11 of Appendix C, RCFC. Subject to prior action by the court, the United States has 60 days from

the file date to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint.

Updated December 2023
#### Stella Gallo et al., Appellants, v Gerald Cook et al., Respondents.

— Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law and facts, with costs, and new trial granted. Memorandum: In this personal injury action, plaintiff Stella Gallo seeks money damages for injuries sustained as a result of a fall allegedly caused by the negligence of defendants. Her husband Joseph Gallo brings a derivative claim for the loss of her services and society. The jury awarded $20,000 to Stella Gallo on the personal injury action and found her 50% comparatively negligent. The jury denied any recovery to Joseph Gallo.

*981The record reveals that Stella Gallo suffered a severe fracture of her left hip, requiring surgery. It was necessary to "pin” the hip with an internal fixation device. She was hospitalized for 11 days, confined to her home for approximately one month and was unable to walk without assistance for almost a year. During that period she could not resume her normal activities, and Joseph Gallo, aided to some extent by his daughter, cared for her and performed many of the routine household tasks which previously had been performed by Mrs. Gallo. There was also testimony that the couple’s sexual relationship was adversely affected and that the parties were unable to engage in other activities which they had previously enjoyed.

There can be no doubt on this record that plaintiff husband suffered some loss, and the absence of an award of damages on his derivative suit is contrary to a fair interpretation of the evidence and inconsistent with the award of money damages on his wife’s personal injury claim *(see, Gray v Brooklyn Hgts. R. R. Co.,*175 NY 448; *Maldonado v WABC Towing Corp.,*121 AD2d 517). Since plaintiffs’ claims are integrally related, a new trial on all issues is appropriate *(Hagler v Consolidated Edison Co.,*99 AD2d 725). It is unnecessary to pass upon the other issues raised on this appeal. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Wagner, J. — negligence.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Denman and Schnepp, JJ.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2457 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the work opportunity 

credit to small businesses which hire individuals who are members of 

the Ready Reserve or National Guard, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 19, 2015 

Ms. PLASKETT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the 

work opportunity credit to small businesses which hire 

individuals who are members of the Ready Reserve or 

National Guard, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hire A Hero Act of 

5 2015’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2457 IH

1 SEC. 2. WORK OPPORTUNITY CREDIT TO SMALL BUSI2 NESSES FOR HIRING MEMBERS OF READY 

3 RESERVE OR NATIONAL GUARD. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 51(d)(1) of the Internal 

5 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘or’’ at the 

6 end of subparagraph (H), by striking the period at the 

7 end of subparagraph (I) and inserting ‘‘, or’’, and by add8 ing at the end the following new subparagraph: 

9 ‘‘(J) in the case of an eligible employer (as 

10 defined in section 408(p)(2)(C)(i)), an indi11 vidual who is a member of— 

12 ‘‘(i) the Ready Reserve (as described 

13 in section 10142 of title 10, United States 

14 Code), or 

15 ‘‘(ii) the National Guard (as defined 

16 in section 101(c)(1) of such title 10).’’. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

18 (1) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by 

19 this section shall apply to wages paid or incurred 

20 after the date of the enactment of this Act in tax21 able years ending after such date. 

22 (2) CURRENT EMPLOYEES COVERED BY CRED23 IT.—For purposes of applying section 51 of the In24 ternal Revenue Code of 1986, individuals described 

25 in section 51(d)(1)(J) of such Code, as added by 

26 this section, who are employed by an eligible emVerDate Sep 11 2014 06:13 May 28, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2457.IH H2457

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2457 IH

1 ployer (as defined in section 408(p)(2)(C)(i) of such 

2 Code) on the date of the enactment of this Act shall 

3 be treated as beginning work for such employer on 

4 such date. 

5 SEC. 3. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF WORK OPPORTUNITY 

6 CREDIT FOR EMPLOYERS HIRING QUALIFIED 

7 VETERANS AND MEMBERS OF READY RE8 SERVE AND NATIONAL GUARD. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 51(c)(4) of the Internal 

10 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting ‘‘(other 

11 than any individual described in subparagraph (B) or (J) 

12 of subsection (d)(1))’’ after ‘‘individual’’. 

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

14 this section shall apply to individuals who begin work for 

15 the employer after December 31, 2014. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2212 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2212

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 1, 2015

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To take certain Federal lands located in Lassen County, California, 
into trust for the benefit of the Susanville Indian Rancheria, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LAND INTO TRUST FOR THE SUSANVILLE INDIAN RANCHERIA.

    (a) In General.--The land described in subsection (b) is hereby 
taken into trust for the benefit of the Susanville Indian Rancheria, 
subject to valid existing rights.
    (b) Land Description.--The land taken into trust pursuant to 
subsection (a) is the approximately 301 acres of Federal land under the 
administrative jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management identified 
as ``Conveyance Boundary'' on the map titled ``Susanville Indian 
Rancheria Land Conveyance'' and dated December 31, 2014.
    (c) Gaming.--Class II and class III gaming under the Indian Gaming 
Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.) shall not be allowed at any 
time on the land taken into trust pursuant to subsection (a).

            Passed the House of Representatives November 30, 2015.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      71,178,825
<SECURITIES>                                68,427,498
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,880,948
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           152,181,678
<PP&E>                                      19,998,729
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,460,469
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             189,355,644
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,377,334
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       215,485
<OTHER-SE>                                 175,839,394
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               189,355,644
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            36,910,790
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               32,935,082
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             546,292
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,502,563
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          8,502,563
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 8,502,563
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.41


</TABLE>