alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2022 Student Art Contest Finalists

Solomon C., 8th Grade, Cupertino, CA.

Green Solar

David J., 3rd Grade, Rancho Cucamonga, CA.

Save Energy and Save Ocean

Nicholas L., 6th Grade, Philadelphia, PA.

Go Solar for Better and Greener Shipping

Shinyee T., Kindergarten, Milpitas, CA.

Greener Ocean, Happier Friends

Yaru C., 8th Grade, Saint Petersburg, FL.

Greener Shipping

Sushanth D., 5th Grade, Concord, NC

The Green Wave for Now and Tomorrow
2022 Student Art Contest Grand Prize Winners

Eva S., 4th Grade, Frederick Md.

Simple, But Effective

Emma J., 8th Grade, Philadelphia, PA

Pollution is No Fun

Jiseok S., 6th Grade, Richmond, BC, Canada

If a Ship Can be Run by Broccoli

Sean Z., 2nd Grade, Delta, BC, Canada

Use Less Oil to Save the Ocean

Madeleine L., 8th Grade, Cupertino, CA.

Wind Energy Ships

Nathan B., 1st Grade, Hamilton ON., Canada

Green Shipping Tech Makes the Future
# C_2021459EN.01001701.xml

| 12.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 459/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 459/17

---

EUROPEAN DEFENCE AGENCY

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2020

(2021/C 459/17)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://eda.europa.eu/docs/default-source/finance-documents/eda-general-annual-accounts-2020_final.pdf

---
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 179 (Monday, September 20, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52224-52225]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-20289]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for Geosciences; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92 -
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the 
following meeting:

NAME AND COMMITTEE CODE: Advisory Committee for Geosciences (1755).

DATE AND TIME: October 13-14, 2021; 11:00 a.m.-4:30 p.m. EDT.

PLACE: National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, 
VA 22314/Virtual Meeting registration information is available on the 
GEO Advisory Committee website at https://www.nsf.gov/geo/advisory.jsp.

TYPE OF MEETING: Open.

CONTACT PERSON: Melissa Lane, National Science Foundation, Room C 8000, 
2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, Virginia 22314; Phone 703-292-8500

MINUTES: May be obtained from the contact person listed above.

PURPOSE OF MEETING: To provide advice, recommendations, and oversight 
on support for geoscience research and education including atmospheric, 
geo-space, earth, ocean and polar sciences.

[[Page 52225]]

Agenda

October 13, 2021

<bullet> Directorate and NSF activities and plans
<bullet> Discussion of the Administration and NSF Focus Area on Climate 
Change
<bullet> Discussion of the Recently Released NASEM Earth System Science 
Study
<bullet> Briefing on the Future TIP Directorate

October 14, 2021

<bullet> Report outs from Division Meetings
<bullet> Update on OPP Activities
<bullet> Report on the EAR Committee of Visitors Meeting
<bullet> Report on the GEO Education & Diversity Committee of Visitors 
Meeting
<bullet> Meeting with the NSF Director and Chief Operating Officer
<bullet> Action Items/Planning for Spring 2022 Meeting

    Dated: September 15, 2021.
Crystal Robinson,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2021-20289 Filed 9-17-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
#### UNITED STATES v. Thomas E. WATKINS, [ XXX XX XXXX ], Boatswain Mate Chief (E-7), U. S. Navy.

NCM 76 1405.

U. S. Navy Court of Military Review.

Sentence Adjudged 6 Nov. 1975.

Decided 12 Nov. 1976.

LT J. R. Cliffe, JAGC, USNR, Appellate Defense Counsel.

CAPT W. D. Blalock, USMCR, Appellate Government Counsel.

Before NEWTON, CRANDELL and GLADIS, JJ.

NEWTON, Senior Judge:

The appellant pleaded not guilty of the charged offense of rape. He was convicted by members at a general court-martial of *the*denominated lesser offense of adultery, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934. His sentence as it comes to this Court consists of forfeiture of $50.00 pay per month for 20 months.

This case was forwarded by the Judge Advocate General of the Navy to this Court for review, pursuant to the provisions of Article 69, UCMJ, with attention invited to the following issue:

> “Is adultery a lesser included offense of rape when the specification alleging the offense fails to set forth the marital status of the accused or the victim?”

Appellate government counsel in their brief join with appellate defense counsel in concluding that the certified issue should be answered in the negative.

For the reasons stated in those briefs, and based on the authorities cited, we agree with appellate counsel. The certified issue is answered in the negative. *See also,*2 Am.Jur.2d, Adultery and Fornication §§ 1 and 3; 65 Am.Jur.2d Rape § 1. Simply stated, the short form allegation of rape in the specification under consideration does not allege an essential element of the offense of adultery — that either or both parties to the offense were married, but not to each other. The specification fails to apprise the accused that he must be prepared to defend against an adultery charge.

Accordingly, the findings of guilty and the sentence are set aside and the offense is dismissed.

Judge CRANDELL and Judge GLADIS concur.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARI)

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD,

Complainant,

VS

MICHAEL BIRKE,

Respondent.

Docket Number 2023-0020

Enforcement Activity No. 7614651

ADMISSION ORDER

Issued: March 21.2023

By Administrative Law Judse: Honorab le Timothv G. Stueve

Appearances:

CWO David Morra

Sector NOLA

For the Coast Guard

Michael Birke, pro se

For Respondent
On or about Febru ary 17,2023,1 the United States Coast Guard (USCG or Coast Guard),

filed a Complaint against Michael Birke (Respondent) alleging one count ofviolation of

misconduct under 46 U.S.C. S 7703(lXB) and 46 C.F.R. $ 5.27.

In the Complaint, the Coast Guard alleges:

1. On November 25,2022, Respondent was employed by Crowley Maritime

Corporation, and subject to their policies.

2. On November 25,2022,NCL, Crowley Maritime Corporation had a policy

prohibiting employees from refusing to submit to required alcohol tests.

3. On November 25,2022, Respondent refused a reasonable suspicion alcohol test, in

violation of Crowley Maritime Corporation Drug and Alcohol Procedures.

4. Respondent's violation of Crowley Maritime Corporation Drug and Alcohol

Procedures is misconduct, as described by 46 U.S.C. $ 7703(lXB) and dehned by 46 C.F.R. $

5.2'.7.

Based on these facts, the Coast Guard proposes four (4) months outright suspension of

Respondent's Merchant Mariner Credential (MMC).

On or about MarchT ,2023, Respondent filed his Answer, admittting to all jurisdictional

and factual allegations as stated in the Complaint. Respondent also agreed to the proposed order

of four (4) months outright suspension, with no additional conditions stipulated.

Upon consideration ofthe record, I hereby FIND that the allegations in the Complaint are

PROVED BY ANSWER. I find that on November 25, 2022, Respondent committed an act of

misconduct, as described by 46 U.S.C $ 7703(1XB) and defined by 46 C.F.R. S 5.27.

I The Complaint in this case has two mismatching dates that indicate when the Complaint was filed: January 17,

2023 and February 17, 2023. CWO Mona clarified that the January date is incorrect and that the Complaint was

filed on February 17, 2023, to match the date in his digital signature on the Complaint's Certificate of Service.
SANCTION

IhavecarefullyreviewedtheComplaintandAnswerandfindthattheproposedsanction

is appropriate under the provisions of46 C.F.R. $ 5.569'

WHEREFORE,

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, Respondent's Coast Guard issued MMC is suspended

outright for four (4) months, commencing on the date Respondent's MMC is deposited with

USCG Sector NOLA,

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, service of this decision on the parties and/or parties'

representative(s) serves as notice ofappeal righrs set forth in 33 C.F.R. g$ 20.1001 - 20.1004.

(Attachment A).

Done and dated, March 2l , 2023 , at

Alameda, Califomia

Timothy G. Stueve

Administrative Law Judge

U.S. Coast Guard

-;*,
# C_2021154EN.01000301.xml

| 30.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 154/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 154/3

---

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2013/184/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/711, and in Council Regulation (EU) No 401/2013, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/706 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Myanmar/Burma

(2021/C 154/03)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in Annex I to Council Decision 2013/184/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/711 (2), and in Annex IV to Council Regulation (EU) No 401/2013 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/706 (4) concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Myanmar/Burma.

The Council of the European Union, after having reviewed the list of designated persons, has decided that the persons that appear in the abovementioned Annexes should continue to be included in the list of persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2013/184/CFSP and Regulation (EU) No 401/2013 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Myanmar/Burma. The grounds for the listing of the persons concerned appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 401/2013 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Myanmar/Burma, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4b of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the abovementioned lists should be reconsidered, before 1 February 2022, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1.C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1.C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council’s periodic review, in accordance with Article 12 of Decision 2013/184/CFSP and Article 4i(4) of Regulation (EU) No 401/2013.

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 111, 23.4.2013, p.75.

(2)  OJ L 147, 30.4.2021, p. 17.

(3)  OJ L 121, 3.5.2013, p. 1.

(4)  OJ L 147, 30.4.2021, p. 1.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       6,088,132
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,593,185
<ALLOWANCES>                                    16,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,542,130
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,068,961
<PP&E>                                      32,617,820
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,713,158
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              38,286,506
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,139,500
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        82,367
<OTHER-SE>                                  35,065,639
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                38,286,506
<SALES>                                     13,119,104
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,965,965
<CGS>                                        9,993,331
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,700,838
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (380,563)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (380,563)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (380,563)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)


</TABLE>
Listen

# Commission Sends Letters to Tennessee Officials and Legislators Transmitting Advisory Committee Report on Civil Asset Forfeiture

August 22, 2019

Letters

-  All News 
-  Commission News 
-  Advisory Committees News 
-  Correspondence 
-  Videos 
-  Archives
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION BY PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Liberté Investors Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ellen V. Billings,
Vice President, Controller and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
the dates and for the periods indicated.

/s/ ELLEN V. BILLINGS

Ellen V. Billings
Vice President, Controller and
Principal Accounting Officer

September 22, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Liberté Investors Inc. and will be retained by Liberté Investors
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 74 (Monday, April 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 20509]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9550]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Deadline for Submission of Application Under the Airport 
Improvement Program (AIP) for Fiscal Year 2000 for Sponsor Entitlement 
and Cargo Funds

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) announces June 1, 
2000, as the deadline for each airport sponsor to have on file with the 
FAA an acceptable fiscal year 2000 grant application for funds 
apportioned to it under the AIP.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Stan Lou, Manager, Programming 
Branch, Airports Financial Assistance Division, Office of Airport 
Planning and Programming, APP-520, on (202) 267-8809.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 47105(f) of Title 49, United States 
Code, provides that the sponsor of each airport to which funds are 
apportioned shall notify the Secretary by such time and in a form as 
prescribed by the Secretary, of the sponsor's intent to apply for the 
funds apportioned to it (entitlements). Notifications of the sponsor's 
intent to apply during fiscal year 2000 for any of its available 
entitlement funds including those unused from prior years, shall be in 
the form of a project application submitted to the cognizant FAA 
Airports office no later than June 1, 2000.
    This notice is promulgated to expedite and prioritize grants in the 
final quarter of the fiscal year. Absent an acceptable application by 
June 1, 2000, FAA will defer an airport's entitlement funds until the 
next fiscal year. Pursuant to the authority and limitations in section 
47117(f). FAA will issue discretionary grants in an aggregate amount 
not to exceed the aggregate amount of deferred entitlement funds. 
Airport sponsors may request unused entitlements after September 30, 
2000.

    Issued in Washington, DC on April 11, 2000.
D. Cameron Bryan,
Acting Manager, Programming Branch.
[FR Doc. 00-9550 Filed 4-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
# C_2023177EN.01014301.xml

| 17.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 177/143 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 177/143

---

P9_TA(2022)0432

Application of Articles 93, 107 and 108 of the TFEU to certain categories of State aid in the rail, inland waterway and multimodal transport sector

European Parliament legislative resolution of 13 December 2022 on the proposal for a Council regulation on the application of Articles 93, 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to certain categories of State aid in the rail, inland waterway and multimodal transport sector (COM(2022)0327 — C9-0290/2022 — 2022/0209(NLE))

(Consultation)

(2023/C 177/21)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2022)0327), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2022)0327),

| — | having regard to Article 109 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C9-0290/2022), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 109 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C9-0290/2022),

| — | having regard to Rule 82 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 82 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A9-0285/2022), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A9-0285/2022),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

2.

| 3. | Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

3.

| 4. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

4.

---
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BILLY DRIVER,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

MACHUCA, Sergeant,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 13-16084

D.C. No. 3:11-cv-05793-SI

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Susan Illston, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 17, 2015** 

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Billy Driver appeals pro se from the district court’s

judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging various constitutional

claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Albino

FILED

FEB 27 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Driver’s requests for oral

argument, set forth in his briefs, are denied.
v. Baca, 747 F.3d 1162, 1171 (9th Cir. 2014) (en banc) (legal rulings on exhaustion

of administrative remedies). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Driver’s First Amendment retaliation

claim for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies because Driver did not

raise in his grievance the claim that he now raises against Machuca in this action. 

See Morton v. Hall, 599 F.3d 942, 946 (9th Cir. 2010) (“[A] grievance suffices if it

alerts the prison to the nature of the wrong for which redress is sought.” (citation

and internal quotation marks omitted)).

Because Driver makes no argument concerning the district court’s dismissal

of his other claims on allegedly “erroneous procedural grounds,” we deem the

issues abandoned. See Pierce v. Multnomah County, Or., 76 F.3d 1032, 1037 n.3

(9th Cir. 1996) (issues not supported by argument in pro se brief are deemed

abandoned); Greenwood v. FAA, 28 F.3d 971, 977 (9th Cir. 1994) (“We review

only issues which are argued specifically and distinctly in a party’s opening brief. 

We will not manufacture arguments for an appellant, and a bare assertion does not

preserve a claim, particularly when, as here, a host of other issues are presented for

review.” (citation omitted)).

We reject Driver’s contentions regarding appointment of counsel and alleged

misconduct by the district judge.

2 13-16084
Driver’s requests for appointment of counsel on appeal and a settlement

conference, set forth in his briefs, are denied.

Driver’s motion to stop filing fee overcharges, filed on October 28, 2013, is

denied without prejudice so that Driver may first raise this issue in the district

court where the alleged wrongful deductions occurred.

AFFIRMED.

3 13-16084
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 22-11240

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Michael Robert Mims, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:22-CR-13-1

______________________________

Before Elrod, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Michael Robert 

Mims has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Mims has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 31, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-11240 Document: 00516879637 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/31/2023
No. 22-11240

2

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to 

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 22-11240 Document: 00516879637 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/31/2023