alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 74 (Monday, April 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 20490]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9513]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND HUMANITIES


Cooperative Agreement for the Continued Management and 
Administration of a Career Development Program for Stage Directors and 
Designers

AGENCY:  National Endowment for the Arts.

ACTION: Notification of Availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Endowment for the Arts is requesting proposals 
leading to the award of one (1) Cooperative Agreement for the continued 
management and administration of a Career Development Program for Stage 
Directors, and a Career Development Program for Stage Designers. These 
Programs enable emerging Stage Directors and Stage Designers to work in 
situations, including residency and/or mentoring activities, that will 
develop their artistic skills and enhance their contributions to 
America's nonprofit professional arts institutions and their audiences. 
The recipient of the Cooperative Agreement will be responsible for all 
aspects of the program including the solicitation of applications from 
Stage Directors and Stage Designers, convening of selection panels, 
administering twelve awards of $17, 500 each to the successful 
applicants, and the development and coordination of appropriate 
residencies or other appropriate placement situations for the Directors 
and Designers. Those interested in receiving the Solicitation package 
should reference Program Solicitation PS 00-03 in their written request 
and include two (2) self-addressed labels. Verbal requests for the 
Solicitation will not be honored. It is anticipated that the Program 
Solicitation will also be posted on the Endowment's Web site at http://www.arts.gov.

DATES:  Program Solicitations PS 00-03 is scheduled for release 
approximately May 1, 2000 with proposals due by May 31, 2000.

ADDRESSES:  Requests for the Solicitation should be addressed to the 
National Endowment for the Arts, Grants & Contracts Office, Room 618, 
1100 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20506.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  William Hummel, Grants & Contracts 
Office, National Endowment for the Arts, Room 618, 1100 Pennsylvania 
Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20506 (202-682-5482).

William I. Hummel,
Coordinator, Cooperative Agreements.
[FR Doc. 00-9513 Filed 4-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
# C_2021459EN.01003101.xml

| 12.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 459/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 459/31

---

EUROPEAN SECURITIES AND MARKETS AUTHORITY

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2020

(2021/C 459/31)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/esma20-95-1381_2020_annual_report.pdf

---
#### In the Matter of Marvin Smith, Appellant, v Harold J. Smith, as Superintendent of Attica Correctional Facility, Respondent.

Present — Dillon, P. J., Green, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
# CI2021139EN.01000301.xml

| 20.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 139/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 139/3

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2013/184/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 401/2013 concerning restrictive measures against Myanmar/Burma apply

(2021/C 139 I/02)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 16 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1).

The legal basis for this processing operation are Council Decision 2013/184/CFSP (2), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/639 (3), and Council Regulation (EU) No 401/2013 (4), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/638 (5).

The controller of this processing operation is the Department RELEX.1.C in the Directorate-General for External Relations – RELEX of the General Secretariat of the Council (GSC), that can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1.C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1.C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Decision 2013/184/CFSP, as amended by Decision (CFSP) 2021/639 , and Regulation (EU) No 401/2013, as implemented by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/638.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil the listing criteria as laid down in Decision 2013/184/CFSP and Regulation (EU) No 401/2013.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the statement of reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions pursuant to Article 25 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725, the exercise of the rights of the data subjects such as the right of access, as well as the rights to rectification or to object will be answered in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2018/1725.

Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the restrictive measures or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Without prejudice to any judicial, administrative or non-judicial remedy, data subjects may lodge a complaint with the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2018/1725.

---

(1)  OJ L 295, 21.11.2018, p. 39.

(2)  OJ L 111, 23.4.2013, p. 75.

(3)  OJ L 132 I, 19.4.2021, p. 12.

(4)  OJ L 121, 3.5.2013, p. 1.

(5)  OJ L 132 I, 19.4.2021, p. 1.

---
* Judge Widener did not participate in consideration of this

case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 46(d).

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1051

In Re: CHARLES D. COUNTS, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, District Judge.

(MC-96-25-A)

Submitted: May 1, 1997 Decided: May 8, 1997

Before WIDENER* and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles D. Counts, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his motions for leave to file actions in the district court. We

have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. In re Counts, No. MC-96-25-A (W.D. Va. Dec. 19,

1996). Additionally, we deny Appellant's motion for judgment. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Harbor Global Company Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen G. Kasnet, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|Dated:    March 23, 2005                 
|                                         
|/s/    STEPHEN G. KASNET                 
|Stephen G. Kasnet Chief Executive Officer



This certification
accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2609 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to repeal the transportation 

alternatives program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 2, 2015 

Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas (for himself and Mrs. HARTZLER) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 

and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to repeal the 

transportation alternatives program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Right-of-Way for 

5 American Drivers Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PRO7 GRAM. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—The following provisions of title 

9 23, United States Code, are repealed: 

10 (1) Section 101(a)(29). 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2609 IH

1 (2) Section 133(b)(11). 

2 (3) Section 213 (and the item relating to that 

3 section in the analysis for chapter 1). 

4 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The repeals made by subsection 

5 (a) shall apply to fiscal years beginning after the date of 

6 enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2505 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require the annual 

reporting of data on enrollment in Medicare Advantage plans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 21, 2015 

Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. BILIRAKIS, and Mr. KIND) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways 

and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require 

the annual reporting of data on enrollment in Medicare 

Advantage plans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Advantage 

5 Coverage Transparency Act of 2015’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2505 IH

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT FOR ENROLLMENT DATA REPORT2 ING FOR MEDICARE ADVANTAGE. 

3 Section 1859 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

4 1395w–28) is amended by adding at the end the following 

5 new subsection: 

6 ‘‘(h) REQUIREMENT FOR ENROLLMENT DATA RE7 PORTING.— 

8 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than May 1 of 

9 each year (beginning with 2016), the Secretary shall 

10 submit to the Committees on Ways and Means and 

11 Energy and Commerce of the House of Representa12 tives and the Committee on Finance of the Senate 

13 a report on enrollment data of the plan year ending 

14 before January 1 of such year. Such enrollment data 

15 shall be presented— 

16 ‘‘(A) by zip code, congressional district, 

17 and State; and 

18 ‘‘(B) in a manner that provides for such 

19 data for each MA–PD plan and for each MA 

20 plan that is not an MA–PD plan. 

21 ‘‘(2) DELAY OF DEADLINE.—If the Secretary is 

22 unable to submit a report under paragraph (1) by 

23 May 1 of year for data of the plan year ending be24 fore January 1 of such year, the Secretary shall, not 

25 later than April 30 of such year notify the commit26 tees described in such paragraph of— 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2505 IH

1 ‘‘(A) such inability, including an expla2 nation for such inability; and 

3 ‘‘(B) the date by which the Secretary will 

4 provide such report, which shall be not later 

5 than June 1 of such year.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### PEOPLE v. NATIONAL MUT. INS. CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 20, 1896.)

No opinion. Motion denied upon payment of $10 costs. See 38 N. Y. Supp. 1147. '
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2133 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2133

 To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide additional training 
opportunities under the Transition Assistance Program to members of the 
         Armed Forces who are being separated from active duty.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 30, 2015

    Mr. Flores (for himself, Mr. Takano, Mr. Sires, Mr. Costello of 
  Pennsylvania, Mr. Wenstrup, and Mr. Carter of Texas) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide additional training 
opportunities under the Transition Assistance Program to members of the 
         Armed Forces who are being separated from active duty.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Servicemembers' Choice in Transition 
Act''.

SEC. 2. AVAILABILITY OF ADDITIONAL TRAINING OPPORTUNITIES UNDER 
              TRANSITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.

    Section 1144 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(f) Additional Training Opportunities.--(1) Beginning not later 
than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this subsection, as 
part of the program carried out under this section, the Secretary of 
Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall permit a member of 
the armed forces eligible for assistance under the program to elect to 
receive additional training in any of the following subjects:
            ``(A) Preparation for higher education or training.
            ``(B) Preparation for career or technical training.
            ``(C) Preparation for entrepreneurship.
            ``(D) Other training options determined by the Secretary of 
        Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security.
    ``(2) The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland 
Security shall ensure that a member of the armed forces who elects to 
receive additional training in subjects available under paragraph (1) 
is able to receive the training.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### BREEN et al., Respondents, v. UNION RY. CO. OF NEW YORK CITY, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 27, 1896.)

Action bjr Mathew P. Breen and Daniel F. Cohalan against the Union Railway Company of New York City.

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs. See 41 N. Y. Supp. 164.
1The Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 00-2853

___________

Lani Brown; Mike Brown, *

*

Appellants, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

J. Miles Sweeney; Bruce Hunt; Jeff * Western District of Missouri.

Monroe; Missouri Court of Appeals; *

Missouri Supreme Court; Jay Nixon, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: December 4, 2000

 Filed: December 8, 2000 

___________

Before BEAM, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Lani and Mike Brown appeal from the district court’s1 dismissal of their

complaint brought under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985(3) and 18 U.S.C. § 1964(a).

The Browns claimed that defendants conspired to deny them, as pro se litigants, equal

protection and meaningful access to the state courts in their pursuit of dental

malpractice actions. Upon de novo review, we conclude dismissal was proper because
2Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413 (1923); District of Columbia Court

of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462 (1983).

-2-

the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction. See Lemonds v. St. Louis County,

222 F.3d 488, 492-95 (8th Cir. 2000) (standard of review for Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1)

dismissal; Rooker-Feldman2

 doctrine forecloses indirect attempts to undermine state

court decisions; federal constitutional claim is “inextricably intertwined” with state

court judgment if federal claim succeeds only to extent state court wrongly decided

issue before it; doctrine applies even where party to federal action was not party to

state action); Keene Corp. v. Cass, 908 F.2d 293, 297 (8th Cir. 1990) (Rooker-Feldman

doctrine applies to claims for injunctive and declaratory relief).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 180 (Tuesday, September 21, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 52502]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-20450]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, September 23, 2021.

PLACE: Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic, the meeting will be open to the 
public via live webcast only. Visit the agency's homepage 
(www.ncua.gov) and access the provided webcast link.

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
    1. Board Briefing, Share Insurance Fund Quarterly Report.
    2. NCUA's 2021 Mid-Session Budget.
    3. Oregon Member Business Lending Rule.
    4. NCUA Board Agenda.
    5. NCUA Rules and Regulations, Subordinated Debt.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks, 
Secretary of the Board, Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2021-20450 Filed 9-17-21; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P
#### Sarah Reese v. O. Teagarden et al.

Where the defendant is sued upon a negotiable note, he cannot plead in re-convention, and recover against the holder the balance of an open account against the original payee of the note, even though he detained it after it became due. “Discounts against the assignor” do not mean that the assignee is liable for any balance over and above the amount of the note. (Paschal’s Dig., Art. 221, Note 284.)

Error from Trinity. The ease was tried before Hon. Samuel A. Wilson, one of the district judges.

The plaintiff declared upon a note payable to George Reese or bearer. The defendant, Teagarden, pleaded that Chandler, the joint promisor, was only security on the note, and that Reese, the original payee, was largely indebted to him, Teagarden, on an account which he exhibited: *“*Geo. Reese, in account with 0. Teagarden.” This account he pleaded in reconvention, charging that the plaintiff received the note, as heir of her father, after its maturity and with knowledge of the offsets. There was no statement of facts. But the court, in the charge, treated Sarah Reese as though she had been George Reese.

Ho briefs have been furnished to the *Reporter.*

Morrill, C. J.

—Plaintiff sued defendants upon anote for $172 00 and interest, and attached properly of defendants. Defendants pleaded that plaintiff obtained the note after it became due, and that the payee and assignor of the note was' indebted to them in the sum of say $500, and reconvened, asking damages for the attachment wrongfully sued out.

The jury found for the defendants $290 62 and $10 damages.

The judge charged the jury that if the payee of the note was indebted to defendant by account, and that the note *643came into the hands of the plaintiff after the maturity of the note, then they would allow the defendant whatever amount he had proved to be due him on account.

The charge was erroneous, and this erroneous charge caused a verdict equally erroneous.

The error of the charge is so apparent, that anything we can add will not make it appear more apparent.

Reversed and remanded.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the results
of operations for the twelve months ended December 31 and include the combined
results for predecessor and successor companies, and is qualified in the
entirely by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           7,199
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   55,602
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,340
<INVENTORY>                                     63,785
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               129,458
<PP&E>                                          15,982
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (1,210)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 214,823
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,598
<BONDS>                                        169,411
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      (7,707)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   214,823
<SALES>                                        241,999
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               241,999
<CGS>                                          152,825
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  152,825
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                90,665
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,952
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,392
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (19,218)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,145
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (21,363)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (21,363)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>