alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

January 19, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

126980 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 127032 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan JOSEPH STAMPLIS and THEODORA Robert P. Young, Jr. STAMPLIS, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiffs-Appellees, Justices 

v SC: 126980 

 COA: 241801 

St. Clair CC: 01-001051-NH 

ST. JOHN HEALTH SYSTEM, d/b/a

RIVER DISTRICT HOSPITAL,

Defendant-Appellant, 

and 

G. PHILLIP DOUGLASS, 

Defendant-Appellee,

and 

HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM, d/b/a 

HENRY FORD HOSPITAL, et al 

Defendants. 

_________________________________________/ 

JOSEPH STAMPLIS and THEODORA 

STAMPLIS, 

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

v SC: 127032 

 COA: 241801 

St. Clair CC: 01-001051-NH 

ST. JOHN HEALTH SYSTEM, d/b/a

RIVER DISTRICT HOSPITAL,

Defendant-Appellee,

and 

G. PHILLIP DOUGLASS, 

Defendant-Appellant, 

and 

HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM, d/b/a 

HENRY FORD HOSPITAL, et al

Defendants. 

_________________________________________/ 
 _________________________________________ 

 

2 

On order of the Chief Justice, a stipulation signed by counsel for the parties 

agreeing to the dismissal of these appeals is considered, and the appeals are DISMISSED 

with prejudice and without costs. 

d0116 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 19, 2007 

Clerk
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.10

                                PROMISSORY NOTE
                                 July 19, 2001

For value received, the undersigned, RMH Teleservices, Inc. ("Borrower"), hereby
promises to pay to the order of Special Investment Risks, Ltd. ("Lender"), in
lawful money of the United States of America, the principal sum of Five Million
Dollars ($5,000,000.00), together with simple interest on the principal amount
hereunder remaining unpaid from time to time, computed on the basis of actual
number of days elapsed in a 360-day year, from the date hereof until this Note
is fully paid at the annual rate equal to eight and one-half percent (8.5%).

The outstanding unpaid principal balance of this Note, plus all accrued and
unpaid interest, shall become due and payable on September 24, 2001.

Borrower agrees to pay all costs of collection, including attorney's fees, in
the event any principal and/or interest on this Note is not paid when due.
Except as otherwise required by the terms of this Note, Borrower hereby waives
presentment, demand, protest, dishonor and notice of dishonor. This Note shall
be governed by the internal laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

IN WITNESS THEREOF, Borrower has executed and delivered this Note as of the date
first above written.

                                                      RMH Teleservices, Inc.


                                                      By: /s/ John Fellows
                                                          ----------------------
                                                      Name: John Fellows
                                                           ---------------------
                                                      Title: CEO
                                                            --------------------
# C_2021475EN.01000101.xml

| 25.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 475/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 475/1

---

Public notification from the European Commission

(2021/C 475/01)

Article 3 of Commission Regulation (EU) No 548/2014 of 21 May 2014 on implementing Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to small, medium and large power transformers (1) provides that:

‘If threshold voltages in electricity distribution networks deviate from the standard ones across the Union, Member States shall notify the Commission accordingly, so that a public notification can be made for the correct interpretation of Tables I.1, I.2, I.3a, I.3b, I.4, I.5, I.6, I.7, I.8 and I.9 in Annex I.’

Pursuant to this provision, the Czech Republic has notified to the Commission that, in deviation from the standard threshold voltages across the Union, the standard voltage in the Czech Republic for the highest voltage for equipment in AC three-phase systems are 38,5 kV instead of 36 kV and 25 kV instead of 24 kV. This national deviation is also highlighted in Cenelec EN 60038, in its Annex 2B.

---

(1)  OJ L 152, 22.5.2014, p. 1.

---
#### Paul RALLO, Plaintiff, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Defendant.

No. 88 C 1712.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

Dec. 12, 1988.

*414Dorie Budlow, Frederick J. Daley, Ltd., Chicago, 111., for plaintiff.

Anton R. Valukas, U.S. Atty. by Eileen Marutzky, Asst. U.S. Atty., Chicago, 111., for defendant.

ORDER

BUA, District Judge.

Plaintiff Paul Rallo has not worked since 1981, when he fell and seriously injured his back. To this day, Rallo continues to experience pain in his lower back. In late 1984, he filed a claim for federal disability benefits. The Secretary of Health and Human Services (“Secretary”) denied Rallo’s disability claim. Following a 1987 hearing on Rallo’s claim, an administrative law judge (“AU”) upheld the Secretary’s denial of benefits. Rallo then appealed the AU’s ruling to this court. Both Rallo and the Secretary have moved for summary judgment. After reviewing the administrative record in this case, this court elects not to enter summary judgment at this time. Instead, the court remands this case to the AU for further consideration of Rallo’s claim.

The AU has acknowledged that Rallo’s back pain would prevent this former truck driver from resuming his previous work. Nonetheless, after applying the medical-vocational guidelines (“the grids”) promulgated by the Secretary, the AU found that Rallo was not disabled because he could perform a full range of sedentary work available in the national economy. The AU’s analysis of the grids sharply conflicts with the opinions of two vocational experts who examined Rallo’s case. Leigh Moxley administered several occupational skills tests to Rallo, then developed a job profile based on Rallo’s test results and physical limitations. Moxley concluded that a person with Rallo’s profile was not qualified for a single job in the state of Illinois. Grace Gianforte testified to the same effect at Rallo’s hearing. Gianforte opined that Rallo’s chronic back pain, combined with his functional illiteracy, would preclude his performance of even the most basic sedentary work.

In determining that Rallo could perform sedentary work, the AU never explained why he rejected the contrary conclusions of Moxley and Gianforte. These vocational experts have offered considerable evidence in opposition to the Secretary’s disposition of Rallo’s claim. The AU must explicitly articulate his reasons for rejecting this line of evidence in order to ensure meaningful appellate review. *See Zblewski v. Schweiker,*732 F.2d 75, 78-79 (7th Cir.1984). Therefore, the court remands this case to the AU for a reconsideration of the substantial vocational evidence supporting Ral-lo’s claim.
# C_2021032EN.01000301.xml

| 29.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10053 — Zollner Elektronik/Syskron Holding/Samhammer/TIKI)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 32/03)

On 22 January 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10053. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10053. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL STATEMENT EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE SHEET
AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FOOTNOTES AND DISCLOSURES IN THE MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   83,942
<ALLOWANCES>                                    18,329
<INVENTORY>                                    787,231
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               852,844
<PP&E>                                         706,449
<DEPRECIATION>                                  75,607
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,483,686
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,598,661
<BONDS>                                         47,380
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,691
<OTHER-SE>                                    (166,046)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,483,686
<SALES>                                          4,488
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,488
<CGS>                                            2,763
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,763
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               416,861
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,038
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,951
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (423,125)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (423,125)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (423,125)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                SECTION 906 OF
                        THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



          In connection with the Quarterly Report of Blount International,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, James S. Osterman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the report.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Blount International, Inc. and will be retained by Blount
International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.


Date: November 19, 2004


/s/ James S. Osterman
-----------------------------
James S. Osterman
President and
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1
  Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted).
  I, Lisa Harper, Chief Executive Officer of Hot Topic, Inc., certify that:
  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Hot Topic, Inc.;
  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.
  Date: April 6, 2011
  /S/    LISA HARPERLisa HarperChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Hot Topic, Inc. and will be retained by Hot Topic, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
  This certification “accompanies” the Form 10-K, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
  I, James McGinty, Chief Financial Officer of Hot Topic, Inc., certify that:
  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Hot Topic, Inc.;
  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.
  Date: April 6, 2011
  /S/    JAMES MCGINTYJames McGintyChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officerand Principal Accounting Officer)
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Hot Topic, Inc. and will be retained by Hot Topic, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
  This certification “accompanies” the Form 10-K, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Auditor

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-34559, 333-47017, 333-56794, 333-99037 and 333-109721) and
the Registration Statements (Form S-3 Nos. 333-105933 and 333-110981) of our reports dated February 18, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Univision
Communications Inc. and subsidiaries included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003.



New
York, New York
March 10, 2004

---

QuickLinks
In the Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided: February 16, 2015

S15A0256. BATEMAN v. SCROGGINS et al.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the court below is affirmed without opinion pursuant

to Supreme Court Rule 59.

Affirmed without opinion. All the Justices concur.
GEORGE MANUEL EDDINS, JR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-1453

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 7, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

J. Scott Duncan, Judge.

George Manuel Eddins, Jr., pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, WETHERELL, and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-20212 

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JERAMIE NELSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-00-CR-676-1

--------------------

October 25, 2001

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jeramie Nelson appeals his guilty-plea conviction for being

a felon in possession of ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 

§ 922(g)(1). Nelson contends that the factual basis was

insufficient to support his guilty plea because the interstate

commerce element of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) cannot constitutionally

be construed to cover ammunition that had simply traveled across

state lines at some point in the past. 

The Government’s allegation that the ammunition was

manufactured in South Dakota and possessed by Nelson in Texas
No. 01-20212 

-2-

provided a sufficient factual basis for the interstate commerce

element of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). See United States v.

Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513 (5th Cir. 2001), 2001 WL 984679, **1, 4,

n.12. As this court recently reaffirmed, “the constitutionality

of [18 U.S.C.] § 922(g)(1) is not open to question.” See id.

(internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of

the district court is AFFIRMED.
# C_2021523EN.01000401.xml

| 28.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 523/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 523/4

---

Networking of organisations operating in the fields within the European Food Safety Authority’s (EFSA’s) mission

(2021/C 523/04)

Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 (1), Article 36(2), provides that the European Food Safety Authority’s ‘Management Board, acting on a proposal from the Executive Director, shall draw up a list to be made public of competent organisations designated by the Member States which may assist the Authority, either individually or in networks, with its mission.’

The list was first drawn up by EFSA’s Management Board on 19 December 2006, and since then is:

| i. | updated regularly, on the basis of proposals from EFSA’s Executive Director, taking account of reviews or new designation proposals from the Member States (in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 2230/2004, Article 2(4) (2)), and |
| --- | --- |

i.

updated regularly, on the basis of proposals from EFSA’s Executive Director, taking account of reviews or new designation proposals from the Member States (in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 2230/2004, Article 2(4) (2)), and

| ii. | made public on EFSA’s website, where the latest updated list of competent organisations is published. |
| --- | --- |

ii.

made public on EFSA’s website, where the latest updated list of competent organisations is published.

This respective information is available on the EFSA website, at the following locations:

| i. | the latest amendment to the list of competent organisations by EFSA’s Management Board on 16 December 2021 – https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/events/event/89th-management-board-web-meeting, and |
| --- | --- |

i.

the latest amendment to the list of competent organisations by EFSA’s Management Board on 16 December 2021 – https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/events/event/89th-management-board-web-meeting, and

| ii. | the updated list of competent organisations – http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/partnersnetworks/scorg. |
| --- | --- |

ii.

the updated list of competent organisations – http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/partnersnetworks/scorg.

EFSA will keep this Notice updated, specifically regarding the provided website links.

For more information please contact Cooperation.Article36@efsa.europa.eu

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety (OJ L 31, 1.2.2002, p. 1).

(2)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 2230/2004 of 23 December 2004 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 with regard to the network of organisations operating in the fields within the European Food Safety Authority’s mission (OJ L 379, 24.12.2004, p. 64), as last amended.

---
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2357 

To direct the Securities and Exchange Commission to revise Form S–3 

so as to add listing and registration of a class of common equity securities on a national securities exchange as an additional basis for satisfying 

the requirements of General Instruction I.B.1. of such form and to 

remove such listing and registration as a requirement of General Instruction I.B.6. of such form. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 15, 2015 

Mrs. WAGNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To direct the Securities and Exchange Commission to revise 

Form S–3 so as to add listing and registration of a 

class of common equity securities on a national securities 

exchange as an additional basis for satisfying the requirements of General Instruction I.B.1. of such form 

and to remove such listing and registration as a requirement of General Instruction I.B.6. of such form. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2357 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Accelerating Access 

3 to Capital Act of 2015’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXPANDED ELIGIBILITY FOR USE OF FORM S–3. 

5 Not later than 45 days after the date of the enact6 ment of this Act, the Securities and Exchange Commission 

7 shall revise Form S–3— 

8 (1) so as to permit securities to be registered 

9 pursuant to General Instruction I.B.1. of such form 

10 provided that either— 

11 (A) the aggregate market value of the vot12 ing and non-voting common equity held by non13 affiliates of the registrant is $75,000,000 or 

14 more; or 

15 (B) the registrant has at least one class of 

16 common equity securities listed and registered 

17 on a national securities exchange; and 

18 (2) so as to remove the requirement of para19 graph (c) from General Instruction I.B.6. of such 

20 form. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS