alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| **EXHIBIT 21**                                  |
|-------------------------------------------------|
| Subsidiaries                                    |
|                                            |   |   |   |   |
| Name                                            |   | Jurisdiction |   | Trade Name of Organization |
|                                            |   |   |   |   |
| CBCA Care Management, Inc.                      |   | New York |   | Patient Infosystems Care Management |
|                                            |   |   |   |   |
| CCS Consolidated Inc.                           |   | Delaware |   | CareGuide |
|                                            |   |   |   |   |
| Coordinated Care Solutions, Inc.                |   | Delaware |   | CareGuide |
|                                            |   |   |   |   |
| Coordinated Care Solutions IPA, Inc.            |   | New York |   | CareGuide |
|                                            |   |   |   |   |
| Coordinated Physicians Solutions, Inc.          |   | Delaware |   | CareGuide |
|                                            |   |   |   |   |
| CCS New Jersey, Inc.                            |   | Delaware |   | CareGuide |
|                                            |   |   |   |   |
| Coordinated Care Solutions of Connecticut, Inc. |   | Delaware |   | CareGuide |
|                                            |   |   |   |   |
| CCS/CG Holdings, Inc.                           |   | California |   | CareGuide |
|                                            |   |   |   |   |
| CareGuide, Inc.                                 |   | California |   | CareGuide |
|                                            |   |   |   |   |
| Coordinated Care Solutions of Texas, Inc.       |   | Texas |   | CareGuide |
|                                            |   |   |   |   |
| IHS Network Services, Inc.                      |   | Delaware |   | CareGuide |
|                                            |   |   |   |   |
| CCS Merger Corp.                                |   | Delaware |   | CareGuide |
|                                            |   |   |   |   |
| Professional Review Network, Inc.               |   | Florida |   | CareGuide |
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 3.2

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
            TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                      CCC INFORMATION SERVICES GROUP INC.




     CCC Information Services Group Inc., a corporation organized and existing
under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Delaware (the "Corporation")
does hereby certify:

     I.   That the Board of Directors of the Corporation, pursuant to Section
     141(i) of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the "Law"),
     adopted a resolution setting forth the amendment to the Amended and
     Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the "Certificate") in substantially
     the form as set forth below, declaring it advisable and submitting it to
     the stockholders of the Corporation for their consideration of such
     amendment to the Certificate.

     II.  That at their annual meeting, held on June 28, 2000 pursuant to
     Section 211 of the Law, the stockholders of the Corporation approved the
     adoption of the amendment to the Certificate in substantially the form as
     set forth below.

     III. That Article 4.1 of the Amended and Restated Certificate of
     Incorporation of the Corporation hereby is amended to provide in its
     entirety as follows:

     "4.1: The total number of shares of stock which the Corporation shall have
authority to issue is 40,000,000 shares of Common Stock, having a par value of
$.10 per share (the 'COMMON STOCK'), and 100,000 shares of Preferred Stock,
having a par value of $1.00 per share (the 'PREFERRED STOCK')."

     IV.  That the foregoing amendment to the Certificate was duly adopted in
     accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the Law.

                            [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]


<PAGE>

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused its Executive Vice President to
execute this Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation on its behalf this 30th day of November, 2000.

                                             CCC INFORMATION SERVICES GROUP INC.


                                             By:    /s/ Reid E. Simpson
                                                    ---------------------------
                                             Name:  Reid E. Simpson
                                             Title: Executive Vice President


                                       2
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2288 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2288

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To remove the use restrictions on certain land transferred to 
          Rockingham County, Virginia, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF USE RESTRICTION.

    Public Law 101-479 (104 Stat. 1158) is amended--
            (1) by striking section 2(d); and
            (2) by adding the following new section at the end:

``SEC. 4. REMOVAL OF USE RESTRICTION.

    ``(a) The approximately 1-acre portion of the land referred to in 
section 3 that is used for purposes of a child care center, as 
authorized by this Act, shall not be subject to the use restriction 
imposed in the deed referred to in section 3.
    ``(b) Upon enactment of this section, the Secretary of the Interior 
shall execute an instrument to carry out subsection (a).''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 30, 2015.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2288

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

     To remove the use restrictions on certain land transferred to 
          Rockingham County, Virginia, and for other purposes.
```
# C_2021043EN.01001001.xml

| 8.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 43/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 43/10

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9609 — Mann Mobilia/Tessner Holding/Tejo/Roller)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 43/02)

On 30 November 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in German language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9609. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9609. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2245 

To require the Federal Trade Commission to consider including Smart Grid 

capability on Energy Guide labels for products. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2015 

Mrs. ELLMERS of North Carolina (for herself and Mr. MCNERNEY) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce 

A BILL 

To require the Federal Trade Commission to consider including Smart Grid capability on Energy Guide labels for 

products. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INCLUSION OF SMART GRID CAPABILITY ON 

4 ENERGY GUIDE LABELS. 

5 Section 324(a)(2) of the Energy Policy and Conserva6 tion Act (42 U.S.C. 6294(a)(2)) is amended by adding the 

7 following at the end: 

8 ‘‘(J)(i) Not later than 1 year after the date 

9 of enactment of this subparagraph, the ComVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:21 May 14, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2245.IH H2245

smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2245 IH

1 mission shall initiate a rulemaking to consider 

2 making a special note in a prominent manner 

3 on any Energy Guide label for any product that 

4 includes Smart Grid capability that— 

5 ‘‘(I) Smart Grid capability is a fea6 ture of that product; 

7 ‘‘(II) the use and value of that feature 

8 depend on the Smart Grid capability of the 

9 utility system in which the product is in10 stalled and the active utilization of that 

11 feature by the customer; and 

12 ‘‘(III) on a utility system with Smart 

13 Grid capability, the use of the product’s 

14 Smart Grid capability could reduce the 

15 customer’s cost of the product’s annual op16 eration by an estimated dollar amount 

17 range representing the result of incre18 mental energy and electricity cost savings 

19 that would result from the customer taking 

20 full advantage of such Smart Grid capa21 bility. 

22 ‘‘(ii) Not later than 3 years after the date 

23 of enactment of this subparagraph, the ComVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:21 May 14, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2245.IH H2245

smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2245 IH

1 mission shall complete the rulemaking initiated 

2 under clause (i).’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from (A) the
financial statements of First Industrial Securities, L.P. for the nine months
ended September 30, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
(B) financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             533
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      223
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (50)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   756
<PP&E>                                          77,416
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,945)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  75,387
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              704
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      74,238
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    75,387
<SALES>                                          8,450
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,450
<CGS>                                          (2,517)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  (2,517)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,352)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,581
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,581
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,581
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-22-00041-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF O.L.S., a Child

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021-PA-00361

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE RIOS, AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED. No costs are assessed against appellants because they are indigent.

SIGNED June 29, 2022.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



The Board of Directors
Rnethealth.com, Inc.


     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the previously
filed Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-80753) of our report
dated October 9, 1999, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of
Rnethealth.com, Inc. (formerly known as The Recovery Network, Inc.) for the
year ended June 30, 1999.



                                                 /s/ CORBIN & WERTZ

                                                     CORBIN & WERTZ



Irvine, California
October 12, 1999
#### Chenowsky, Respondent, *v.*Volpin, Appellant.

*(Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.*

June 26, 1890.)

Appeal from fifth district court.

Argued before Allen, P. J., and Bookstaver, J.

*TJllo & Ruebsamen,*for appellant. *J. Manheim,*for respondent.

Ho opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
# C_2021504EN.01003601.xml

| 14.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 504/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 504/36

---

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/2196, and in Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2193 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

(2021/C 504/10)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/2196 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2193 (4) concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.

The Council of the European Union has decided that those persons should be included in the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2014/145/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. The grounds for designations of those persons appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the web sites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address before 4 January 2022:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1.C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1.C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 16.

(2)  OJ L 445 I, 13.12.2021, p. 14.

(3)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 6.

(4)  OJ L 445 I, 13.12.2021, p. 4.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2352 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2352

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to require making available 
   to States affected by determinations that species are endangered 
   species or threatened species all data that is the basis of such 
                determinations, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 15, 2015

Mr. Neugebauer (for himself, Mr. Newhouse, Mrs. Lummis, Mr. Huizenga of 
 Michigan, and Mr. Collins of Georgia) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to require making available 
   to States affected by determinations that species are endangered 
   species or threatened species all data that is the basis of such 
                determinations, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``State, Tribal, and Local Species 
Transparency and Recovery Act''.

SEC. 2. DECISIONAL TRANSPARENCY AND USE OF STATE, TRIBAL, AND LOCAL 
              INFORMATION.

    (a) Requiring Decisional Transparency With Affected States.--
Section 6(a) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1535(a)) 
is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(1)'' before the first sentence; and
            (2) by striking ``Such cooperation shall include'' and 
        inserting the following:
            ``(2) Such cooperation shall include--
                    ``(A) before making a determination under section 
                4(a), providing to States affected by such 
                determination all data that is the basis of the 
                determination; and
                    ``(B)''.
    (b) Ensuring Use of State, Tribal, and Local Information.--
            (1) In general.--Section 3 of the Endangered Species Act of 
        1973 (16 U.S.C. 1532) is amended--
                    (A) by redesignating paragraphs (2) through (21) as 
                paragraphs (3) through (22), respectively; and
                    (B) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following:
            ``(2) The term `best scientific and commercial data 
        available' includes all such data submitted by a State, tribal, 
        or county government.''.
            (2) Conforming amendment.--Section 7(n) of such Act (16 
        U.S.C. 1536(n)) is amended by striking ``section 3(13)'' and 
        inserting ``section 3(14)''.
                                 <all>
```
#### GARLOCK v. GARLOCK.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 16, 1896.)

Action by Jason Garloek .against Orilla C. Garloek and Jane C. Church, individually and as administratrix with the will annexed of John B. Grow, deceased.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.
#### In re Anthony Eugene BROOKS, Petitioner.

No. 11-1155.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 21, 2011.

Decided: April 22, 2011.

Anthony Eugene Brooks, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Eugene Brooks petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing his immediate release or an order for “the Government to show cause why an evidentiary hearing should *not*be held immediately.” We conclude that Brooks is not entitled to mandamus relief.

Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. *Kerr v. United States Dist. Court,*426 U.S. 394, 402, 96 S.Ct. 2119, 48 L.Ed.2d 725 (1976); *United States v. Moussaoui,*333 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. *In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n,*860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir.1988). Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. *In re Lockheed Martin Corp.,*503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007).

The relief sought by Brooks is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*