alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[870 NE2d 678, 839 NYS2d 439]

#### In the Matter of Christopher Mapp, Respondent, v Gregory Burnham, as Chief Technology Officer of Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, et al., Appellants.

Decided June 7, 2007

*1000APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Milton H. Pachter, General Counsel, Port Authority of New York and New Jersey,*New York City *(Joan F. Bennett, Carlene McIntyre*and *Anne M. Tannenbaum*of counsel), for appellants.

*Traub & Traub, P.C.,*New York City *(Doris G. Traub*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The judgment appealed from and the order of the Appellate Division brought up for review should be reversed, with costs, and the petition dismissed. The determination of respondent Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (the PA) terminating petitioner’s employment is supported by substantial evidence *(see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County,*34 NY2d 222, 230 [1974]). Evidence in the record supports the finding that petitioner misled the American Red Cross concerning his employment status and obtained financial assistance under false pretenses. Moreover, in light of petitioner’s misconduct, “we cannot conclude that the penalty of dismissal imposed . . . shocks the judicial conscience” *(Matter of Rutkunas v Stout,*8 NY3d 897, 898 [2007] [internal citations and quotation marks omitted]; *see Matter of Scahill v Greece Cent. School Dist., 2*NY3d 754, 756 [2004]; *Matter of Pell,*34 NY2d at 233).

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur in memorandum.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), judgment appealed from and order of the Appellate Division brought up for review reversed, etc.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N NO. 03-10-00785- CV In re Walter Lee Hall, Jr. ORIGINA L PR OCEEDING F ROM TRAVIS CO UNTY M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Relat o r h as fi l ed a petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8. Having considere d rela tor’s ar g uments and the re cord, w e deny the petition for wr it of mandamus.

__________________________________________ David Pury ear , J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Pury ear and Pember

ton Filed: De cembe r 13, 2010
EXHIBIT
32.1
  
 PERICOM
SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
 PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
  In
connection with this quarterly report of Pericom Semiconductor Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 27, 2008 (the
“Report”), I, Alex C. Hui, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
knowledge:
 (1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 (2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
and for the periods indicated.
 
  
 February
4, 2009
    By:
              /s/ Alex C.
      Hui
                Alex
      C. Hui
                Chief
      Executive Officer
                Pericom
      Semiconductor Corporation
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       SECTION 906 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the Quarterly Report of Emeritus Corporation, a Washington
corporation  (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended September 30,
2003,  as  filed  with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the  "Form  10-Q/A"),  I, Raymond R. Brandstrom, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:


1.     The  Form 10-Q/A fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

2.     The  information  contained  in  the  Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.




                                             /s/    Raymond  R.  Brandstrom
                                            -------------------------------
                                            Raymond  R.  Brandstrom
                                            Chief  Financial  Officer
                                            November  10,  2003


A  signed  original  of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears  in  typed  form within the electronic version of this written statement
required  by  Section 906, has been provided to Emeritus Corporation and will be
retained  by  Emeritus  Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request."
# C_2021512EN.01000101.xml

| 20.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 512/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 512/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10358 – ADVENT INTERNATIONAL / EURAZEO / PLANET PAYMENT GROUP)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 512/01)

On 22 September 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10358. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10358. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
# L_2010106EN.01001201.xml

| 28.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 106/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 106/12

---

COMMISSION DECISION

of 27 April 2010

repealing Decision 2009/780/EC fixing the net amounts resulting from the application of voluntary modulation in Portugal for calendar years 2010, 2011 and 2012

(notified under document C(2010) 2516)

(Only the Portuguese text is authentic)

(2010/235/EU)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 378/2007 of 27 March 2007 laying down rules for voluntary modulation of direct payments provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 (1), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Decision 2009/780/EC (2) has fixed the net amounts resulting from the application of voluntary modulation in Portugal for calendar years 2010, 2011 and 2012. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Decision 2009/780/EC (2) has fixed the net amounts resulting from the application of voluntary modulation in Portugal for calendar years 2010, 2011 and 2012.

| (2) | Since the difficulties to its agricultural sector provoked by the economic crisis persist with a continuing negative impact on the economic situation of farmers, Portugal has communicated to the Commission that it has decided not to apply the voluntary modulation at all. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Since the difficulties to its agricultural sector provoked by the economic crisis persist with a continuing negative impact on the economic situation of farmers, Portugal has communicated to the Commission that it has decided not to apply the voluntary modulation at all.

| (3) | Decision 2009/780/EC should therefore be repealed, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Decision 2009/780/EC should therefore be repealed,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Decision 2009/780/EC is hereby repealed.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Portuguese Republic.

Done at Brussels, 27 April 2010.

For the Commission

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 95, 5.4.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 278, 23.10.2009, p. 59.

2

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BLOUNT INTERNATIONAL, INC. FOR THE PERIOD ENDED
JUNE 30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          22,307
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  121,111
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,271
<INVENTORY>                                     93,603
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               259,116
<PP&E>                                         312,016
<DEPRECIATION>                                 179,627
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 521,405
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          104,257
<BONDS>                                         85,107
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           194
<OTHER-SE>                                     285,934
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   521,405
<SALES>                                        330,590
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               330,590
<CGS>                                          222,556
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  222,556
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,460
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 39,565
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,519
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             25,046
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    25,046
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.29
        

</TABLE>
# C_2021073EN.01000201.xml

| 2.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9776 — Worldline/Ingenico)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 73/02)

On 30 September 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9776. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9776. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
EX-10.8





 Exhibit 10.8 

Spousal Consent 

April 2, 2021 
 I, Liu Jia (ID card No.:
**), the legal spouse of Zhang Tianze (ID card No.: **), hereby unconditionally and irrevocably agree that the shares of LinkDoc Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. (“the Company”) held by and registered in the name of Zhang Tianze, my spouse,
will be dealt with according to the arrangements under the controlling agreements (including the Amended and Restated Exclusive Share Purchase Agreement, the Amended and Restated Shareholder Voting Rights Proxy Agreement and the Amended and Restated
Equity Pledge Agreement) (“the Controlling Agreements”) signed by my spouse on April 2, 2021 with LinkDoc Information Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. (“the Sole Proprietorship”) and other relevant parties. 

I further guarantee that I will not take any action in conflict with the above arrangements, including but not limited to claiming that the shares constitute
the jointly owned property of us as a couple. I hereby unconditionally and irrevocably waive any right or interest that may be granted to me by any applicable law in respect of the shares. 

I acknowledge that Zhang Tianze does not need my further authorization or consent to perform, further amend or terminate the Controlling Agreements. I
undertake that I will execute all the necessary documents and take all the necessary actions to ensure the proper performance of the Controlling Agreements (as amended from time to time). I agree and undertake that if I acquire any shares held by
Zhang Tianze for any reason, I shall be bound by the Controlling Agreements (as amended from time to time) and the Amended and Re-stated Exclusive Consulting and Service Agreement between the Sole
Proprietorship and the Company dated April 2, 2021 (the “Service Agreement”), and comply with the obligations under the Controlling Agreements (as amended from time to time) and the Service Agreement as a shareholder of the Company,
and for this purpose, once requested by the Sole Proprietorship, I shall execute the written documents in substantially the same form and content as the Controlling Agreements (as amended from time to time), and the Service Agreement. 

I further acknowledge, undertake and guarantee that in the event of the death, incapacity, divorce from my spouse or any other circumstances that may affect
the exercise of his shareholder rights in the Company, none of my heirs, guardians, creditors or any other person entitled to assert a right or interest in the shares of the Company held by my spouse will take any action that may affect or prevent
the performance of the obligations of my spouse under the Controlling Agreements in any manner or under any circumstances. 
 [There is no
text below, followed by the signature page of the Spousal Consent.] 












 [There is no text in this page, which is the signature page of the Spousal Consent of Zhang Tianze.] 

 

			
	Signatory:	 	 /s/ Liu Jia



 
			
	Spouse’s name: Liu Jia
	ID card No.: **
# CI2021074EN.01000101.xml

| 3.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 74/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 74/1

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2021/C 74 I/01)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

| Date and time of closure | 21.1.2021 at 00.00 UTC |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 21.1.2021 - 31.12.2021 |
| Member State | Member States fishing under ‘Other Member States’ quota |
| Stock or Group of stocks | COD/1/2B_AMS |
| Species | Cod (Gadus Morhua) |
| Zone | 1 and 2b |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | --- |
| Reference number | 01/TQ/92 |

Date and time of closure

21.1.2021 at 00.00 UTC

Duration

21.1.2021 - 31.12.2021

Member State

Member States fishing under ‘Other Member States’ quota

Stock or Group of stocks

COD/1/2B_AMS

Species

Cod (Gadus Morhua)

Zone

1 and 2b

Type(s) of fishing vessels

---

Reference number

01/TQ/92

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

---
# C_2021453EN.01000201.xml

| 9.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 453/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 453/2

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10249 – DERICHEBOURG ENVIRONNEMENT / GROUPE ECORE HOLDING)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 453/02)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Derichebourg Environnement (France), belonging to the Derichebourg group; |
| --- | --- |

—

Derichebourg Environnement (France), belonging to the Derichebourg group;

| — | Groupe Ecore Holding SAS (‘Ecore Holding Group’, France). |
| --- | --- |

—

Groupe Ecore Holding SAS (‘Ecore Holding Group’, France).

Derichebourg acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Ecore.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | For Derichebourg Environment: environmental services (collection and recovery of metal waste, services to local governments such as household waste collection) and services to businesses (cleaning, temporary work, outsourced aeronautical services, energy, etc.). |
| --- | --- |

—

For Derichebourg Environment: environmental services (collection and recovery of metal waste, services to local governments such as household waste collection) and services to businesses (cleaning, temporary work, outsourced aeronautical services, energy, etc.).

| — | For Ecore Holding Group: all activities in the recycling chain: collection, recovery and marketing of end-of-life materials. Its core business is metal recycling. It also recycles paper and plastic waste. |
| --- | --- |

—

For Ecore Holding Group: all activities in the recycling chain: collection, recovery and marketing of end-of-life materials. Its core business is metal recycling. It also recycles paper and plastic waste.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission no later than ten days following the date on which this notification is published. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10249 – DERICHEBOURG ENVIRONNEMENT / GROUPE ECORE HOLDING

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
# C_2021031EN.01000201.xml

| 28.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9711 — Alliance Healthcare Deutschland AG/GEHE Pharma Handel GmbH)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 31/02)

On 17 August 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9711. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9711. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Skip to main content

Privacy Policy•Site map

# Edward H. Meyers

Judge Meyers was appointed Judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims on October 20, 2020.  Prior to his appointment, he was a partner with Stein Mitchell Beato & Missner LLP from 2012-2020.  Before joining Stein Mitchell, he was an associate at the Washington, D.C. office of Kirkland & Ellis LLP from 2006-2012.  While in private practice, Judge Meyers focused on complex civil litigation and tried cases in state and federal courts across the country.  From 2005-2006, Judge Meyers served as a law clerk to the Honorable Loren A. Smith, Senior Judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims.

Judge Meyers was born and raised in Washington, D.C.  He received his JD, summa cum laude, from The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law.  He received the John L. Garvey Faculty Award, which is awarded to the graduate with the highest academic average, and was an associate editor of the Catholic University Law Review.  Judge Meyers received his B.A. from Vanderbilt University.

Judge Meyers is married and has one son and two stepsons.

Howard T. Markey National Courts Building • 717 Madison Place, NW, Washington, DC 20439 • 202-357-6400