alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 171 (Wednesday, September 8, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 50349]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19474]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT SYSTEM INSURANCE CORPORATION


Regular Meeting; Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation Board

AGENCY: Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation.

ACTION: Notice, regular meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, in accordance with the provisions of 
Article VI of the Bylaws of the Farm Credit System Insurance 
Corporation (FCSIC), of a forthcoming regular meeting of the Board that 
a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of FCSIC will be held.

DATES: September 14, 2021, at 10:00 a.m. EDT, until such time as the 
Board may conclude its business. Note: Because of the COVID-19 
pandemic, we will conduct the board meeting virtually. If you would 
like to observe the open portion of the virtual meeting, see 
instructions below for board meeting visitors.

ADDRESSES: To observe the open portion of the virtual meeting, go to 
FCSIC.gov, select ``News & Events,'' then ``Board Meetings.'' There you 
will find a description of the meeting and ``Instructions for board 
meeting visitors.'' See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for further 
information about attendance requests.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dale Aultman, Secretary to the Board 
of the Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation, (703) 883-4009. TTY is 
(703) 883-4056.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Parts of this meeting of the Board will be 
open to the public and parts will be closed. If you wish to observe the 
open portion, follow the instructions above in the Addresses section at 
least 24 hours before the meeting. Please note that this meeting begins 
at 10:00 a.m. EDT with a session that is closed to the public. You may 
join this meeting at 10:45 a.m. EDT. We will begin the open session 
promptly at 11:00 a.m. EDT.
    Assistance: If you need assistance for accessibility reasons or if 
you have any questions, contact Dale Aultman, Secretary to the Farm 
Credit Administration Board, at (703) 883-4009. The matters to be 
considered at the meeting are as follows:

A. Closed Session

<bullet> Report on Insurance Risk/Premium Risk Factors

B. Approval of Minutes

<bullet> June 17, 2021

C. Quarterly Business Reports

    <bullet> FCSIC Financial Reports
    <bullet> Report on Insured Obligations
    <bullet> Report on Annual Performance Plan

D. New Business

<bullet> Annual Performance Plan
<bullet> Budget for 2022 and 2023
<bullet> Insurance Fund Progress Review and Setting of Premium Range 
Guidance for 2022

    Dated: September 3, 2021.
Dale Aultman,
Secretary, Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2021-19474 Filed 9-7-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 6, 2020

No. 04-19-00776-CV

IN RE STATE OF TEXAS, ex. rel. Todd A. “Tadeo” Durden, County Attorney

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

On December 4, 2019, this court issued an opinion dismissing relator’s petition for writ 

of mandamus as moot. On December 20, 2019, relator filed a motion for rehearing and the real 

parties in interest filed an objection. After considering the arguments raised by relator and the 

real parties in interest, the motion for rehearing is hereby DENIED. Costs and sanctions

requested by the real parties in interest are DENIED.

It is so ORDERED on January 6, 2020.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 4845, 4863, 4866, styled The State of Texas, ex. rel. Todd A. Durden, in 

His Official Capacity as County Attorney v. James T. “Tully” Shahan, in His Official Capacity as County Judge; et 

al., pending in the 63rd Judicial District Court, Kinney County, Texas, the Honorable Sid L. Harle presiding.
#### In the Matter of Maureen McNamara (Admitted as Maureen Margaret McNamara), a Suspended Attorney, Appellant.

Submitted December 26, 2006;

decided February 20, 2007

Motion for reconsideration of this Court’s November 21, 2006 dismissal order *[see*7 NY3d 899] granted and, upon reconsideration, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. Motion for leave to appeal denied. Motion for relief ancillary to the motion for leave and appeal denied.
# U nit ed Sta tes C ou rt o f A pp eal s For t h e Firs t C ircu it

______________________ Nos. 06-1484 & 06-1501

UNITED STATES, Appellee,

v. ISMAEL ALFONZO-REYES and VANESSA MORALES-HERNANDEZ,

Defendants, Appellants.

______________________
ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on January 25, 2010, is amended as follows:
O n p a g e 3 , l i n e s 6

- 8 , " A l f o n z o w a s e m p l o y e d a s a F S A loan manager and Morales worked as a FSA contract employee in Ponce, Puerto Rico." should be replaced with "Alfonzo was employed as a FSA loan manager in Ponce, Puerto Rico and Morales worked as a FSA contract employee in Arecibo, Puerto Rico." On page 3, lines 8-11, "Morales had previously worked at the law office of Efrén Irizarry-Colon ("Irizarry") in Arecibo, Puerto Rico preparing FSA loan applic a t ions and earning a 4 percent commission on the loans" should be replaced with "Morales also worked at the law office of Efrén Ir i z a r r y-Colon ("Irizarry") in Ar e c i b o , P u e r t o R i c o w h e r e s h e p r e p a r e d F S A l o a n a p p l i c a t i ons. Irizzary charged a 4% commission on these loans and Morales received a portion of the commission." On page 3, line 19, "Director, to reveal" should be replaced with "Director, and several other farmers to reveal" On page 4, line 2, after "the loans." insert "Morales would receive a portion of the commission for her assistance in compiling the loan applications." On page 4, lines 6

- 8 , "appellants submitted FSA loan andi ncentive applications bearing false information on behalf of

thirteen dairy farmers for alleged damage to v a r i ous dairy farms owned by the Toledo fam i l y . " should be replaced with "appellants provided false information on FSA loan and incentive applications on behalf of at least thirteen dairy farmers for alleged damage to various dairy farms, many owned by the Toledo family." On page 5, line 1 9 , " Morales" should be replaced with "Alfonzo" On page 10, line 16, "Counts 20 a n d 2 1 c harged Morales and Alfonzo, respectively," should be replaced with "Count 20 charged Morales and Alfonzo" On page 12, line 14, "submitting" should be replaced with "assisting in the submission" On page 16, line 14, "Alfonzo" should be replaced with "Torres" On pa g e 1 6 , line 19, "the Arecibo office" to "Irrizary’s office" On page 16, line 20, "the Arecibo office" to " I r r i z ary’s office"
# Patent

## Title
Coprecipitation process

## Abstract

In place of the 40/60 mixture of C.sub.10 /C.sub.14 alkane sulfonates of Example 8, there is substituted a 60/40 mixture.

## Background
## Claims

1. A non-mushing high lathering synthetic toilet bar having a pH of about 4.5-9.5 and consisting essentially of based on the total weight of the actives: sulfonates wherein the carbon chain contains 12 carbon atoms or averages 12 carbon atoms; thereof wherein the carbon chain contains or averages 12 carbon atoms; consisting of: alkali metal, magnesium or ammonium salts of C.sub.12 -C.sub.16 primary alkyl phosphonates and alkali metal, magnesium or ammonium salts of C.sub.12 -C.sub.16 primary alkyl phosphates; and

2. The toilet bar of claim 1 wherein the alkane sulfonate is a C.sub.12 alkane sulfonate.

3. The toilet bar of claim 1 wherein the fatty acids are C.sub.12 fatty acids.

4. The toilet bar of claim 1 wherein the alkane sulfonate fraction consists of 40-60% of C.sub.10 homologs and 60-40% of C.sub.14 homologs.

5. The toilet bar of claim 1 wherein the alkane sulfonate is present in an amount of about 56% and consists of an equal mixture of C.sub.10 and C.sub.14 homologs; the fatty acid is present in an amount of about 23%; and the binder modifier is present in an amount of about 16%.

6. The toilet bar of claim 1 wherein the alkane sulfonate is present in an amount ranging from about 55% to about 80%.

7. The toilet bar of claim 6 wherein the fatty acid is present in an amount ranging from about 10% to about 25%.

8. The toilet bar of claim 7 wherein the binder modifier is present in an amount ranging from about 10% to about 25%.
Exhibit 99.2


                                  CERTIFICATION


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I hereby certify that:

         (C) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q(i);

         (B) To the best of my knowledge this Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q (i)
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
and Exchange Act of  1934(U.S.C.  78m(a) or 78o(d));  and, (ii) the  information
contained in this Report fairly present, in all material respects, the financial
condition  and results of  operations  of Tengasco,  Inc.  and its  Subsidiaries
during the period covered by this report.


Dated: May 20, 2003

                                                       /s/ Mark A. Ruth
                                                       ------------------------
                                                       Mark A. Ruth
                                                       Chief Financial Officer


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Tengasco,  Inc. and will be retained by Tengasco, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### William L. PAULEY, Claimant-Appellant, v. R. James NICHOLSON, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 2006-7329.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

June 28, 2007.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of William L. Pauley’s unopposed motion to dismiss his appeal,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

*992(1) The motion is granted.

(2) All sides shall bear their own costs.
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| DATED this 26th day of July, 2017.       |   |   |
|------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                     |   |   |
|                                     |   |   |
| /s/ Steve W. Laut                        |   |   |
| Steve W. Laut                            |   |   |
| President (Principal Executive Officer), |   |   |
| Canadian Natural Resources Limited       |   |   |

----
#### NOLAN, Respondent, v. LEWIS, Appellant.

(Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.

April 2, 1894.)

Action by Thomas Nolan against John P. Lewis.

John Habenfeld, for appellant.

Thomas Nolan, Esq., in pro. per.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff sued for the value of services rendered him to the defendant in the capacity of attorney and counselor. As to the fact of plaintiff’s employment by defendant, the record discloses a conflict of evidence with which we have nothing to do. That the services in question were performed is not disputed, and we find no reason for holding that the sum of $100, as found by the justice to be the reasonable value thereof, is excessive. No questions of law are presented by the record. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
#### Powell, Appellant, *v.*Russell, Respondent.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department.*

May 2, 1890.)

Mo opinion. Order affirmed,, with $10 costs and disbursements.
NO. 12-18-00165-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

JOHNNY M. STAFFORD, 

APPELLANT

V.

BOWLES ENERGY, ET AL,

APPELLEES

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE 4TH 

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

RUSK COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).

On June 21, 2018, the Clerk of this Court notified Appellant that the filing fee in this 

appeal is due. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5. Appellant was informed that failure to remit the filing fee 

on or before July 2, 2018, would result in the Court’s taking appropriate action, including 

dismissal of the case without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). The date for remitting 

the filing fee has passed, and Appellant has not complied with the Court’s request.

Also on June 21, we notified Appellant that his notice of appeal failed to contain the 

information specifically required by Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.5 and 25.1(d)-(e).

See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5, 25.1(d)-(e), 37.1. The notice warned that, unless Appellant filed a 

proper notice of appeal on or before July 2, the appeal would be referred to the Court for 

dismissal. The deadline has passed and Appellant has not filed a compliant notice of appeal or 

otherwise responded to this Court’s June 21 notice.

Because Appellant has failed, after notice, to comply with Rules 5, 9.5, and 25.1(d)-(e), 

the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).

Opinion delivered July 18, 2018.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

JULY 18, 2018

NO. 12-18-00165-CV

JOHNNY M. STAFFORD,

Appellant

V.

BOWLES ENERGY, ET AL,

Appellees

Appeal from the 4th District Court 

of Rusk County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 2007-150)

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being 

considered, it is the opinion of this Court that this appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that 

this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court 

below for observance

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
# C_2021430EN.01000901.xml

| 25.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 430/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 430/9

---

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 430/09)

| Member State | Republic of Croatia |
| --- | --- |
| Route(s) concerned | | Dubrovnik – Zagreb – Dubrovnik |

Member State

Republic of Croatia

Route(s) concerned

Dubrovnik – Zagreb – Dubrovnik

| | Split – Zagreb – Split |
| --- | --- |

Split – Zagreb – Split

| | Zagreb – Zadar – Pula – Zadar – Zagreb |
| --- | --- |

Zagreb – Zadar – Pula – Zadar – Zagreb

| | Zagreb – Brač – Zagreb |
| --- | --- |

Zagreb – Brač – Zagreb

| | Osijek – Dubrovnik – Osijek |
| --- | --- |

Osijek – Dubrovnik – Osijek

| | Osijek – Split – Osijek |
| --- | --- |

Osijek – Split – Osijek

| | Osijek – Zagreb – Osijek |
| --- | --- |

Osijek – Zagreb – Osijek

| | Osijek – Pula – Split – Pula – Osijek |
| --- | --- |

Osijek – Pula – Split – Pula – Osijek

| | Osijek – Rijeka – Osijek |
| --- | --- |

Osijek – Rijeka – Osijek

| | Rijeka – Split – Dubrovnik – Split – Rijeka |
| --- | --- |

Rijeka – Split – Dubrovnik – Split – Rijeka

| | Rijeka – Zadar – Rijeka |
| --- | --- |

Rijeka – Zadar – Rijeka

| | Osijek – Zadar – Osijek |
| --- | --- |

Osijek – Zadar – Osijek

Period of validity of the contract

1.5.2022 – 28.3.2026

Deadline for submission of tenders

60 days from the publication of the this notice

Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligations can be obtained

| Ministry of the Sea, Transport and Infrastructure |
| --- |
| Directorate General of Civil Aviation, Electronic Communications and Post |
| Prisavlje 14 |
| 10000 Zagreb |
| REPUBLIC OF CROATIA |

Ministry of the Sea, Transport and Infrastructure

Directorate General of Civil Aviation, Electronic Communications and Post

Prisavlje 14

10000 Zagreb

REPUBLIC OF CROATIA

Tel. +385 16169060

Fax +385 16196393

Email: PSO@caacro.hr

---
### OFFICE OF T’ HEA’ lTORNEY GENERAL OF **TEXAS** 

### AUSTIN

Honozwble Henry c. l$jLe county **Attorney** 

### HWO county 8ut nertt08, Texa.8 Dmr 

### Jar. Kylet



### *n 0pinlon or thir dew mment on the l haab ee n reaeived 

### from vhfah ve qu ra a&o the Tmteeea 

### Sohool Dirtriot 

### l uqtetarion

or rtudent 

### in the



## qwitht IO 

## 60 r0ii0w4t xe the rule 

## or the Board or Trustees 

## 0r the 

### San litwaos 

### Independent sohool Diatriot sunpending ioF 

### the current sohool year 

### a 

### studentvho PprrIea rsaaoxmble and valid?

In your letter pu olts the8 

### spplicable Texnr statute8 and also a 

### nwabar of mm@ deoided by the 

### @ourt@ at this state mwtaining vartoua rular e~tdalirhad by rehool 

## b0tird8 r0r ths g0vOnrannt

or the 

## rah00l andr0r th0dit5Oiplitw

### Bon. mnry 0. KYle - p4P 2



## 0r **th6 student**  **body.** et al, 1?2 90. 

## Th6 en06 

## 0r w0Lm8

et al 

## v. Tmatema, 737, referred 

### to in your 

### 16tteP clearly holds that A rule aatebliahed br e&O31 authOritlea 

### auuh E6 the tie in 

## qwationia **WP4PaOmblS** and lnvslld. The oplnSon **la by**  **ths** 

## suprem **Court of**  

### #iaalealppi **mad vNh**  **It** la **per** l ua a ive,

It la, of course, not blndln,g in this state.

Our courts hold th8t aohool autimrltlea have 

### a brud 4iooretiort 

### io promulgating 

### nalm ror the 

### goveaaHttit Or 5UhOOlO Md dlSC$pUJM Or 8tUdOBt5, aI%d it la g0~rsrallj,hold that t& ~lailw and upedleney of a rule **eatab** lLa&d +y achaol bonrde ior tha oond\rot of the aahool la entirely wlthln the jumnt and dLacretlon of au& boarda and v1l.l rmt be cpatuvbod 

### by the court8 unl6aa 

### it clearly appear5 

### th8t th6 pule la rrbltrary 

### and ttttrassonabl6. St 

### vi11 be Obaermd th8t 

### U&P Artlaln 

### 2904, **R. C.**  **S.,** 

### that th6 **authority** 

### 0r th0 raboo~.bcmrd to suspend a l

### tudttnt

rr0t5

### the privilegse 0r 

### the roheolfpr the aumea 

## l ahoolycr la llaltedto **lneorz4.giblh** 

### eonduct **on** the part 

### ‘ar the student.



### ,

**xt i5**  **thought th0t**  **th6 0plni0tt**  

## 0r **the** 

### tt0tm

In the aa*e 

### 0raaeob, IIaplu,l8 eOundafid **cthosa$d** 

### control our anaverto 

### your qwation. 

### TherOrom,.VQ 

### thak that pw quartian ahourd be, and It Is, **sarrsmd la**  **the negative.**  r&r5 **V6ry** mtly ATTQRREY

(3mIEluL GP rExA d4-r’ F-- BY * **B. 2.**  Price Ra6s6tant **EPP ”**  **BT** AEPROBEDDEC 3, 1942
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2208 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2208

   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to strengthen and 
                   protect Medicare hospice programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 1, 2015

 Mr. Reed (for himself and Mr. Thompson of California) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to strengthen and 
                   protect Medicare hospice programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Hospice Commitment to Accurate and 
Relevant Encounters Act'' or the ``Hospice CARE''.

SEC. 2. ENSURING TIMELY ACCESS TO HOSPICE CARE.

    (a) In General.--Section 1814(a)(7)(D)(i) of the Social Security 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1395f(a)(7)(D)(i)) is amended to read as follows:
                            ``(i) a hospice physician, nurse 
                        practitioner, clinical nurse specialist, or 
                        physician assistant (as those terms are defined 
                        in section 1861(aa)(5)), or other health 
                        professional (as designated by the Secretary), 
                        has a face-to-face encounter with the 
                        individual to determine continued eligibility 
                        of the individual for hospice care prior to the 
                        first 60-day period and each subsequent 
                        recertification under subparagraph (A)(ii) (or, 
                        in the case where a hospice program newly 
                        admits an individual who would be entering 
                        their first 60-day period or a subsequent 
                        hospice benefit period or where exceptional 
                        circumstances, as defined by the Secretary, may 
                        prevent a face-to-face encounter prior to the 
                        beginning of the hospice benefit period, not 
                        later than 7 calendar days after the 
                        individual's election under section 1812(d)(1) 
                        with respect to the hospice program) and 
                        attests that such visit took place (in 
                        accordance with procedures established by the 
                        Secretary); and''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) takes 
effect on January 1, 2016, and applies to hospice care furnished on or 
after such date.
                                 <all>
```