alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.1


Director Compensation 


The members of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) who are not employees of the Company (the “Non-Employee Directors”) receive (i) an annual retainer of $50,000, (ii) an award of restricted share units with a grant date value of $50,000 granted annually on the date of the Company’s Annual General Meeting of Shareholders (with $25,000 of the value based on the closing price of the Company’s Class A voting common shares and $25,000 of the value based the Company’s Class B non-voting common shares, on the last trading day prior to the grant date and the number of units rounded to the nearest whole unit) (which award may instead be granted by the Board as a fixed amount of cash vesting in annual installments over three years following the date of grant) and (iii) the other retainers and fees set forth in the table below. The restricted share units vest in annual installments over three years following the date of grant and are paid in an equivalent number of the Company’s Class A voting common shares and the Company’s Class B non-voting common shares. Pursuant to the Company’s policies, directors are also reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred in the performance of their duties.




	
		
	Type of Compensation
	Amount of Compensation

	 
	 

	Annual Retainer
	$50,000

	Audit & Risk Committee Chair Retainer
	$15,000

	Other Committee Chair Retainer
	$10,000

	Committee Meeting Retainer 
	$1,400 per meeting

	Chairman of the Board Retainer
	$52,000

	Annual Equity Grant Value
	$50,000

	 
	 






The retainers and fees for the Non-Employee Directors are paid, at the director’s election, in all cash, 50% in cash and 50% in the form of the Company’s common shares (with the 50% portion that will be paid in shares to be paid 50% in the Company’s Class A voting common shares and 50% in the Company’s Class B non-voting common shares), or 100% in the form of the Company’s common shares (with 50% to be paid in the Company’s Class A voting common shares and 50% in the Company’s Class B non-voting common shares). However, the Board retains discretion to provide for the retainers for one or more directors to be paid in a different mix of cash and the Company’s common shares (whether in Class A shares, Class B shares or a combination thereof) as it determines appropriate. Retainers are paid in two installments each year, with the number of the Company’s common shares to be delivered in payment of any retainer to be determined by dividing the dollar amount of the retainer to be paid in the form of the Company’s common shares by the average closing price of the Company’s common shares (either Class A shares or Class B shares, as applicable) for the previous five (5) business days prior to payment, and are fully vested at the time of payment.
July 3 , 2012



### JUDGMENT



## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NASIR W. QUIRESHI D/ B/A/ Q LEGAL SOLUTIO NS , Appellant

NO. 14

- 12

- 00302

- CV V.

THE UNAUTHORIZED PRA CTICE OF LAW COMMITT EE , Appellee

____________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment
signed by the court below on November 29, 2011. Having considered the motion and
found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by NASIR

W. QUIRESHI D/B/A/ Q LEGAL SOLUTIONS

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          20,702
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,912
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        379
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,878
<PP&E>                                          67,392
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,445
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  80,825
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,454
<BONDS>                                            755
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,525
<OTHER-SE>                                      59,421
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    80,825
<SALES>                                         38,821
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,821
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,520
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (156)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,390
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,557
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,833
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .50
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

f]NITED STATES COAST GUARI)

Address of Administrative Law Judge Dockering Center:

AIJ Docketing Center

U.S. Custom House

40 South Gay Street, Room 414

Baltimore, MD 212024022

Email: alidocketcente(Auscg-mil

Phone: (410) 962-5100

Toll Free: (866) 612-7524 [6IA-SKCG]

Fax: (410) 962-1746

Toll Free Fax: (877) 243-3453 [CGE-FILEI

COMPLAINANT:

UNITf,D STATES COAST GUARD

RESPONDENT: Michael Colligan DOCKET NUMBER ]O].]-(D I9

WITHDRAWAL FROM DOCKET CG ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY NTIMBER

76t7 361

The Coast Guard initiated an administrative proceeding by filing a Complaint on January 17,

2023, seeking Revocation of Respondent's Merchant Mariner Credential.

On February 7,2023, the Coast Guard filed a Notice of Withdrawal from docket as:

The Respondent signed a Voluntary Surrender Agreement under 46 CFR$ 5.203.

This matter is removed from the docket and closed without prejudice effective this date.

Done and Dated February 8,2023 at

Baltimore. MD

Lauren M. Meus

Hearing Docket Clerk

U.S. Coast Guard

By Direction of the Chief Administrative Law

Judge
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 179 (Monday, September 20, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 52132]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-20416]



[[Page 52132]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 1:30 p.m. EDT, Monday, September 27, 2021.

PLACE: Virtual meeting.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Enforcement matters. In the event that the 
time, date, or location of this meeting changes, an announcement of the 
change, along with the new time, date, and/or place of the meeting will 
be posted on the Commission's website at https://www.cftc.gov/.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Christopher Kirkpatrick, 202-418-
5964.
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

    Dated: September 16, 2021.
Christopher Kirkpatrick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2021-20416 Filed 9-16-21; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of S.M.O. and * From the County Court at Law

S.B.O., children, of Ector County,

Trial Court No. CC-3556-PC.

No. 11-17-00217-CV * September 15, 2017

* Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

 This court has considered Appellant’s motion to dismiss this appeal and 

concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in accordance with this 

court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
Listen

# Commission Business Meetings

The Commission meets monthly to conduct agency business on civil rights matters. Pursuant to the Sunshine Act, meetings of official business of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights are open to the public, apart from executive sessions, which may be closed pursuant to the exemptions of the Sunshine Act.

People with disabilities are always encouraged to attend Commission meetings. Those who plan to attend a meeting and require accommodations should notify USCCR via email to access@usccr.gov, as soon as possible to allow time to make arrangements.

Hearing-impaired persons who wish to attend a meeting and require the services of a sign language interpreter should contact Pamela Dunston at (202) 376-8105 or at signlanguage@usccr.gov at least seven business days before the scheduled date of the meeting.

If you require additional information on any commission meeting please contact:

Angelia RorisonDirector of Media and Communications(202) 376-8371

View Commission business meeting dates for 2024 as passed by majority vote of USCCR Commissioners.

Commission Business Meeting
Event Date: November 18, 2022

Commission Business Meeting
Event Date: October 21, 2022

Commission Business Meeting
Event Date: September 16, 2022

Commission Business Meeting
Event Date: August 19, 2022

Commission Business Meeting
Event Date: July 22, 2022

-    First  
-    Previous  
-   ...  
-  2 
-  3 
-  4 
-   ...  
-   Next  
-   Last  

-  Event Calendar 
-  Public Briefings 
-  Commission Business Meetings 
-  Advisory Committees Meetings 
-  Archives
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 29, 2022

No. 04-22-00441-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF R.L.W., E.L.W., R.A.W. AND R.L.W., Children

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021PA01022

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The reporter’s record was due July 28, 2022, but was not filed. On July 29, 2022, the 

court reporter filed a notification of late record, requesting an extension of fifteen days to file the 

record. 

Accordingly, we GRANT the court reporter’s request for an extension of time and 

ORDER the court reporter to file the reporter’s record in this court by August 12, 2022. The 

court reporter is reminded that strict deadlines exist with regard to disposal of appeals dealing 

with termination of parental rights. We further remind the court reporter that in appeals from 

orders terminating the appellant’s parental rights, we may not grant extensions of time to file the 

appellate record that exceed 30 days cumulatively. TEX. R. APP. P. 28.4(b). 

It is so ORDERED on this 29th day of July, 2022.

 PER CURIAM 

 ATTESTED TO: ______________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001018740
<NAME> FOOTHILLS HOLDINGS COMPANY, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           9,871
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,121,339
<ALLOWANCES>                                   189,633
<INVENTORY>                                    321,110
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               943,528
<PP&E>                                      21,196,635
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,775,279
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,831,408
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          799,303
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,305,606
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,831,408
<SALES>                                      1,984,360
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,486,655
<CGS>                                        1,018,942
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,755,380
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,704
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              35,644
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,694,631
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,694,631
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,694,631
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
##### 



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF CNL HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a), AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the registrant;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or caused such disclosure controls and procedures
to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented
in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors:
 a.
    
    All significant
deficiencies and
material weaknesses
in the design or
operation of internal
control over
financial reporting
which are reasonably
likely to adversely
affect the
registrants ability
to record, process,
summarize and report
financial
information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or
not material, that
involves management
or other employees
who have a
significant role in
the registrants
internal control over
financial reporting.
 By: /s/ Thomas J. Hutchison IIIName:
    Thomas J. Hutchison IIIDate: March 31, 2006
    
    Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

10:00 a.m. EDT, Thursday, September 30, 2021.

# PLACE:

Virtual meeting.

# STATUS:

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

                        Enforcement matters. In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website at                         *https://www.cftc.gov/​.*

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Christopher Kirkpatrick, 202-418-5964.

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

Dated: September 16, 2021.

Christopher Kirkpatrick,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2021-20417 Filed 9-16-21; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
NEWTON RESERVOIRLatitude: 41.9Longitude: -111.976Elevation: 4760

NEWTON RESERVOIR

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Blue Creek Site Page...



Blue Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Cache Junction Site Page...



Cache Junction

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Oxford Spring Site Page...



Oxford Spring
#### Edna WOODALL and Alfreda K., Frank M. and Mary Milliace, and Daniel M., Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Nicholas BARTOLINO, County Adjuster for the County of Mercer, Bill Mathesius, County Executive for the County of Mercer, County of Mercer, Defendants, State of New Jersey, Intervenor.

Civ. A. No. 85-1781.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

April 7, 1988.

*222Arthur J. Rosenberg, Deputy Director, Dept, of the Public Advocate, Div. of Mental Health Advocacy, Trenton, N.J., for plaintiffs.

Gail Henningsen, Asst. Mercer County Counsel, Office of the Mercer County Counsel, Trenton, N.J., for defendants Nicholas Bartolino, Bill Mathesius, and County of Mercer.

Dennis Conklin, Deputy Atty. Gen., Office of the Atty. Gen., Richard J. Hughes Justice Complex, Trenton, N.J., for inter-venor, State of N.J.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND APPLICATION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION

COWEN, Circuit Judge.

The motion having been made by plaintiffs through their attorney, Alfred A. Slocum, Public Advocate, Arthur J. Rosenberg, Esq., Deputy Director, Division of Mental Health Advocacy, appearing, for Summary Judgment pursuant to Rule 56, *Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,*and the Court having considered the pleadings, the briefs, stipulations of fact submitted by both parties, having heard argument by both sides, having considered the argument and testimony proffered at the hearing for preliminary injunction; having found that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that plaintiffs are entitled to judgment as a matter of law; and the Court having previously made and filed its findings of fact and conclusions of law in its opinion filed on October 24, 1985, 700 F.Supp. 210, and the Court having concluded plaintiffs are entitled to judgment as a matter of law for the relief prayed for in paragraphs 6 and 10 in their Second Amended Complaint, to the extent that it is hereinafter granted, it is

ORDERED AND DECREED;

1. That plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment for the claim alleged in Count Three of the Second Amended Complaint and for the relief demanded in paragraphs 6 and 10 in Plaintiffs’ Prayer for Relief is hereby granted.

2. That the terms of the Opinion and Preliminary Injunction issued by this Court on October 24, 1985 prohibiting defendants from seeking and using the power of state courts to enforce the application of Social Security and Supplemental Security Income benefits to the cost of hospitalization be made permanent.

3. That the practice on the part of defendants of submitting and enforcing judicial orders requiring plaintiffs and members of the class to make payments from their statutorily exempt Social Security and Supplemental Security Income benefits is hereby declared unlawful and is enjoined.

4. That the Social Security and Supplemental Security Income benefits of plaintiffs and members of the class are protected under 42 *U.S.C.*§ 407 and 42 *U.S.C.*§ 1383(d)(1) from any legal process by means of which defendants might seek to alienate them from plaintiffs.
# C_2021439EN.01000301.xml

| 29.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 439/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 439/3

---

Annual report on EU agencies for the financial year 2020

(2021/C 439/03)

The European Court of Auditors will publish its annual report for the 2020 financial year on EU agencies together with their replies on 29 October 2021.

The report can be consulted directly or downloaded from 9:00 on 29 October 2021 at the European Court of Auditors’ website:

https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/Pages/DocItem.aspx?did=59697

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-664
In Re: BERNARD LAMBRIGHT, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Submitted: September 25, 1997 Decided: October 20, 1997 Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bernard Lambright, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Bernard Lambright filed a petition for a writ of mandamus asking this court to compel the dismissal of an indictment in a state court action. Federal courts have no general power to compel action by state courts. See Davis v. Lansing , 851 F.2d 72, 74 (2d. Cir. 1988); Gurley v. Superior Court of Mecklenburg County , 411 F.2d 586, 587 (4th Cir. 1969). Accordingly, although we grant the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit 1

Case 3:16-cv-00088-SI Document 1-1 Filed 01/19/16 Page 1 of 5
Case 3:16-cv-00088-SI Document 1-1 Filed 01/19/16 Page 2 of 5
Case 3:16-cv-00088-SI Document 1-1 Filed 01/19/16 Page 3 of 5
Case 3:16-cv-00088-SI Document 1-1 Filed 01/19/16 Page 4 of 5
Exhibit 23.1 

 

The Board of Directors 

Dover Motorsports, Inc.: 

 

We consent tothe incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (No. 333-58779) on Form S-8 of Dover Motorsports, Inc. of our report dated January 29, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Dover Motorsports, Inc. and subsidiaries asof December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of earnings and comprehensive earnings and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, the six-months ended December 31, 2000 and the year ended June 30, 2000,which report appears in the December 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K of Dover Motorsports, Inc. Our report refers to a change in the method of accounting for goodwill and intangible assets. 

 

KPMG LLP 

 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

March 11, 2003