alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Storage                    
csv

      Inflow                    
csv

      Total Release                    
csv

      Pool Elevation                    
csv

      Release Volume                    
csv

      Delta Storage                    
csv

      Inflow Volume                    
csv

#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Storage                    
json

      Inflow                    
json

      Total Release                    
json

      Pool Elevation                    
json

      Release Volume                    
json

      Delta Storage                    
json

      Inflow Volume                    
json
Listen

# Maine Advisory Committee Issues Addendum to Report: The Right to Criminal Legal Defense in Maine

April 4, 2024

The Maine Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights has released a report addendum following their November report on the right to criminal legal defense in Maine. Despite increased public attention to Maine’s lack of public defenders since the Committee first took testimony on this issue in 2022, Maine has not provided a system of fully funded public defense that meets the current need. With this in mind, the Committee is releasing an addendum to highlight the barriers that currently exist to fully funding a system for indigent public defense in Maine.

Press Release

Report

Maine

-  All News 
-  Commission News 
-  Advisory Committees News 
-  Correspondence 
-  Videos 
-  Archives
# C_2021005EN.01001001.xml

| 7.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 5/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 5/10

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10057 — Schlumberger/CEA/Genvia JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 5/10)

On 21 December 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M10057. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M10057. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Listen

# Racial Disparities in Violent Crime Victimization in the United States

The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights will hold a briefing on, Friday, November 17, 2023, on racial and ethnic disparities in violent crime victimization in the United States. The Commission’s investigation seeks to examine the federal government’s role in collecting data and addressing racial disparities in violent victimization as an important dimension of the fair administration of justice.

At this public briefing, Commissioners will hear from subject matter experts such as government officials, academics, community advocates, and impacted persons. The Commission will accept written materials from the public for consideration as we prepare our report; submit to victimsofcrime@usccr.gov no later than December 15, 2023.

Friday, November 17, 2023 - 9:00 AM

Save the Date

Meeting Notice & Agenda

Media Advisory

Public Comment Notice

Transcript

November 17, 2023

-  Event Calendar 
-  Public Briefings 
-  Commission Business Meetings 
-  Advisory Committees Meetings 
-  Archives
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-19-00418-CR

Michael Patrick Lee

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

28th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. CR16002709-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

April 30, 2020
Listen

# Acquisition Opportunities

The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights publishes all Requests for Proposals throughFedBizOpps, which is the single government point-of-entry for Federal governmentprocurement opportunities over $25,000. To learn more about FedBizOpps, seewww.fbo.gov. In addition, we may post open acquisition opportunities on our web site.

CCR-16-0001 Solicitation Synopsis (PDF)

-  Our Mission 
-  Commissioners 
-  Offices and Staff 
-  Careers 
-  Acquisition Opportunities 
-  Rankin Memorial Library 
-  FAQs
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-23-0000346

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

STATE OF HAWAI I, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DRAKE HATHON, Defendant-Appellant

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT

(CR. NO. 1CPC-21-0001564)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL (By: Hiraoka, Presiding Judge, Wadsworth and Guidry, JJ.) Upon consideration of Defendant-Appellant Drake Hathon's August 7, 2023 Motion to Dismiss Appeal, the papers in support, and the record,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed, under Hawai i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 42(b) and (c).

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, December 6, 2023. /s/ Keith K. Hiraoka Presiding Judge /s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth Associate Judge /s/ Kimberly T. Guidry Associate Judge

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-23-0000346 06-DEC-2023 07:59 AM Dkt. 24 OGMD
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-12945 and 333-47353) of ROCKSHOX, INC. of our report
dated April 24, 1998 on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and
the financial statement schedule of ROCKSHOX, Inc. as of March 31, 1997 and 1998
and for the three years in the period ended March 31, 1998, which report is
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


                                             COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

San Jose, California
June 24, 1998
#### MULLEN, Respondent, v. VILLAGE OF GLENS FALLS, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

January 12, 1897.)

Action by Thomas Mullen against the village of Glens Falls.

No opinion. Motion for leave to go to the court of appeals denied. See 42 N. Y. Supp. 113.
EXHIBIT
13.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of RADCOM Ltd. (the “Company”)
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jonathan Burgin, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




1.        The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.        The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
March 25, 2010





/s/ Jonathan BurginJonathan
      BurginChief
      Financial Officer(Principal Financial
Officer)
UNITED STATES SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                     Washington, D.C.  20549
                                
                           FORM 10-KSB
                                
(Mark One)
[x]       ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
          SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (FEE REQUIRED)

           For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 1996
                                
                               OR

[ ]       TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE
          SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (NO FEE REQUIRED)

          For the transition period from __________ to __________

                Commission File Number 000-21729

      __________APPLIED INTELLIGENCE GROUP, INC.___________
     (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

_______ Oklahoma____________          ________73-1247666_______
(State or other jurisdiction of          (I.R.S Employer
 incorporation or organization)        Identification Number)

          13800 Benson Road
  _______ Edmond, Oklahoma__________           _____73013_____
(Address of principal executive offices)         (Zip Code)


Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (405) 936-2300

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (b)of the Act:

                                              Name of Exchange 
         Title of each class                on which registered
                None                                None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (g) of the Act:
                                
   Common Stock and Redeemable Common Stock Purchase Warrants
                        (Title of class)

     Check whether the Registrant(1) has filed all reports required to
be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such report) and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

                     Yes   _X_      No ____

     Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to
Item 405 of Regulation S-B contained in this form, and no disclosure will
be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy
or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-KSB or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB.  [X]

     The issuer's revenues for the year ended December 31, 1996 were
$9,507,370.

     As of March 14, 1997, there were 2,726,944 outstanding shares of
Common Stock, par value $.001 per share.  The aggregate market value of
the voting stock of the registrant held by non-affiliates of the registrant
on March 14, 1997, based on the average bid and asked price on such date
was $3,812,500.

     Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format:  Yes _____   No __X___
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1973 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1973

To require the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to retain and redistribute 
                  certain amounts collected as fines.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 22, 2015

  Mrs. Lowey introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to retain and redistribute 
                  certain amounts collected as fines.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. USE OF FUNDS.

    The Nuclear Regulatory Commission shall retain amounts collected 
for safety-related fines, and shall distribute those amounts to 
counties for maintaining radiological emergency preparedness plans 
required in connection with the nuclear facility with respect to which 
the fines were collected.
                                 <all>
```
BILLY J. WILLIAMS, OSB #901366 

United States Attorney 

District of Oregon 

ETHAN D. KNIGHT, OSB #99298 

GEOFFREY A. BARROW 

CRAIG J. GABRIEL, OSB #01257 

Assistant United States Attorneys 

ethan.knight@usdoj.gov 

geoffrey. barrow@usdoj.gov 

craig. gabriel(a),usdoj. gov 

1000 SW Third Ave., Suite 600 

Portland, OR 97204-2902 

Telephone: (503) 727-1000 

Attorneys for United States of America 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

v. 

AMMON BUNDY, et al., 

Defendants. 

3:16-CR-00051-BR 

MOTION TO UNSEAL 

REDACTED SUPERSEDING 

INDICTMENT 

The United States of America, by Billy J. Williams, United States Attorney for the 

District of Oregon, and through Ethan D. Knight, Geoffrey A. Barrow, and Craig J. Gabriel, 

Assistant United States Attorneys, moves the Court for an order unsealing the Superseding 

Indictment as to defendants 1 through 25 in this matter because those defendants are now aware 

that the Superseding Indictment has been filed. A redacted Indictment is presented herewith. 

Respectfully submitted this 9th day of March 2016. 

Assistant United States Attorneys 

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 280 Filed 03/09/16 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No.s 333-116649, 333-115743,
333-106688, 333-86567, 333-86513, 333-59803 and 333-17935) pertaining to the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan, 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and 2004 Stock Incentive Plan of Document Sciences Corporation of our report dated January 28, 2005, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Document Sciences Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004.



/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP



|                     
|---------------------
|San Diego, California
|March 22, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      27,900,802
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,530,809
<ALLOWANCES>                                    18,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            36,402,346
<PP&E>                                      10,442,505
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,170,625
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              41,765,655
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,945,776
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       153,698
<OTHER-SE>                                  33,444,945
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                41,765,655
<SALES>                                     29,544,852
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            29,544,852
<CGS>                                       15,433,548
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               26,807,567
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             753,623
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,431,997
<INCOME-TAX>                                   159,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,272,497
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,272,497
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17


</TABLE>
# C_2021089EN.01000201.xml

| 16.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10190 — OTPP/KKR/Caruna Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 89/02)

On 10 March 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10190. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10190. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7122

GREGORY LEON YOUNG,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

LORETTA K. KELLY,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge.

(7:07-cv-00037-GEC)

Submitted: October 17, 2007 Decided: November 14, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory Leon Young, Appellant Pro Se. Denise Colette Anderson,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Gregory Leon Young seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Young has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5 the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-20474

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RONALD WAYNE SAPP,

Defendant-Appellant.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Texas

(H-96-CR-22501)

 

February 25, 1998

Before GARWOOD, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.*

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Wayne Sapp appeals his guilty plea conviction for being

a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. §

922(g)(1). Sapp argues that the federal government cannot,

consistent with the Interstate Commerce Clause, the Tenth

Amendment, and in the wake of United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549,
1Here, Sapp apparently never traveled interstate with the

weapon and did not obtain it through interstate channels; his

possession of it was in Texas in 1994 and 1995, and it apparently

had been in Texas, owned by his father and subsequently his mother,

continuously for more than forty years. At some unspecified time

prior to Sapp’s father’s acquisition of the weapon (apparently in

Texas)——which seems to have been before Sapp was born——it had been

manufactured outside of Texas; no other connection or relation to

interstate commerce is alleged or even suggested by the record.

2

567-68 (1995), punish a felon’s mere possession of a firearm that

has traveled in interstate commerce at some unspecified time in the

past because such possession lacks a sufficient nexus with

interstate commerce.1 Section 922(g)(1) has been upheld

consistently as constitutional. See United States v. Kuban, 94

F.3d 971-973 (5th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 117 S.Ct. 716 (1997);

United States v. Rawls, 85 F.3d 240, 242 (5th Cir. 1996).

AFFIRMED
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 20, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-51157

c/w No. 04-51159

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RAYMUNDO ALCALA-CHAVEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:02-CR-1410-ALL

--------------------

Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Raymundo AlcalaChavez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a

prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. §

1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s

motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the

district court is AFFIRMED.
No. 

-2-
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO





18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,





AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Paid, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in their respective capacities as capacity as President and CEO of the Company and as CFO of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Gregory RotmanGregory RotmanPresident and CEOMarch 12, 2010/s/ Richard RotmanRichard RotmanChief Financial OfficerMarch 12, 2010