alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

Calendar No. 395 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2081 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 16, 2016 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 

AN ACT 

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction 

of a hydroelectric project involving the Gibson Dam. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL ENERGY 

4 REGULATORY COMMISSION PROJECT IN5 VOLVING GIBSON DAM. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the require7 ments of section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 

8 806) that would otherwise apply to the Federal Energy 

9 Regulatory Commission project numbered 12478–003, the 

10 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (referred to in 

11 this section as the ‘‘Commission’’) may, at the request of 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2081 PCS

1 the licensee for the project, and after reasonable notice 

2 and in accordance with the procedures of the Commission 

3 under that section, extend the time period during which 

4 the licensee is required to commence construction of the 

5 project for a 6-year period that begins on the date de6 scribed in subsection (b). 

7 (b) DATE DESCRIBED.—The date described in this 

8 subsection is the date of the expiration of the extension 

9 of the period required for commencement of construction 

10 for the project described in subsection (a) that was issued 

11 by the Commission prior to the date of enactment of this 

12 Act under section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 

13 806). 

Passed the House of Representatives March 15, 

2016. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS

asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 395 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2081 

AN ACT 

To extend the deadline for commencement of conGibson Dam. struction of a hydroelectric project involving the 

MARCH 16, 2016 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2021161EN.01000201.xml

| 3.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/2

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2021/C 161/02)

1.

As provided for in Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury. Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit G-1), CHAR 4/39, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Aluminium road wheels | The People’s Republic of China | Anti-dumping duty | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/109 of 23 January 2017 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain aluminium road wheels originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council
  (OJ L 18, 24. 1.2017, p. 1) | 25.1.2022 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

Aluminium road wheels

The People’s Republic of China

Anti-dumping duty

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/109 of 23 January 2017 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain aluminium road wheels originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council

(OJ L 18, 24. 1.2017, p. 1)

25.1.2022

---

(1)  OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.

1

(2)  TRADE-Defence-Complaints@ec.europa.eu

2

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

3

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northwest Pipe Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Richard A. Roman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ RICHARD A. ROMAN                 
|Richard A. Roman                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|November 4, 2010
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-50912, 333-88313, and 333-106325 of
Edgewater Technology, Inc on Form S-8 of our report dated March 30, 2004, relating to the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the years ended
December 31, 2003 and 2002 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to i) a change in accounting in 2002 for intangible assets and
ii) the application of procedures relating to certain disclosures of financial statement amounts related to the 2001 consolidated financial statements that were audited by other auditors
who have ceased operations and for which we have expressed no opinion or other form of assurance other than with respect to such disclosures) appearing in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Edgewater Technology, Inc. for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002.

DELOITTE &
TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
March 30, 2004

---

QuickLinks
#### Ray Moore, Respondent, v J. H. Williams Industrial Products, Inc., Formerly Doing Business as Vulcan Tools, Division of TRW, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Present — Callahan, J. P., Den-man, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
1

**IN THE SUPREME COUR T FOR THE ST** 

**AT E OF MONT** 

**ANA CASE NO.**  **DA**

**23 -**  **0425 Rikki Held, et al.**  **,**

Petitioner and Appellee , v. **State of Montana, et al.,**

Respondent and Appellant . **ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEA VE**  **TO FILE AM**  **ICUS CURIAE BRIEF** The States of

N orth Dakota, Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Mississippi, Mi ssouri, Nebraska, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah, Wyo ming , and the Commonwealth of Virginia (“Amici States”) have moved for leave to file an amicus brief. Their motion is unopposed. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Amic i States ’ Unopposed M otion for Leave to F ile an Amic us Curiae B rief is GRANTED . Am ic i States shall file their Amicus Brief by February 23, 2024. **ELECTRONICALL**

**Y SIGNED**  **AND DA**

**TED BELOW**

**.**

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 21 2024

02/21/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0575
# C_2021059EN.01000201.xml

| 19.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 59/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 59/2

---

Notice for the attention of the persons, entities and bodies to which restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/101/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/258 and in Council Regulation (EC) No 314/2004, as amended by Council Regulation (EU) 2021/251 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Zimbabwe apply

(2021/C 59/02)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons, entities and bodies that appear in Annex I to Council Decision 2011/101/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/258 (2), and in Annex III to Council Regulation (EC) No 314/2004 (3), as amended by Council Regulation (EU) 2021/251 (4) concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Zimbabwe.

The Council of the European Union has decided that the persons, entities and bodies that appear in the above-mentioned Annexes should continue to be included in the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2011/101/CFSP and in Regulation (EC) No 314/2004.

The attention of the persons, entities and bodies concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 314/2004 in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 7 of the Regulation).

The persons, entities and bodies concerned may submit a request to the Council before 1 November 2021, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the abovementioned list should be reconsidered. Any such request should be sent to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1.C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1.C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email:sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The attention of the persons, entities and bodies concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council's decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 42, 16.2.2011, p. 6.

(2)  OJ L 58, 19.2.2021, p. 51.

(3)  OJ L 55, 24.2.2004, p. 1.

(4)  OJ L 58, 19.2.2021, p. 9.

---
N'KOSI LERONE JONES

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 2889

Opinion filed October 7 , 2016.

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel

.

N'Kosi Lerone Jones, pro se , Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Bryan Jordan, Senior Assistant Attorney

Gener al, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

D ISMISSE D as successive. Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(d)(6)(C)

.

LEWIS, WETHERELL, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.
IIB 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2288 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 1, 2015 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT 

To remove the use restrictions on certain land transferred 

to Rockingham County, Virginia, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2288 RFS

1 SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF USE RESTRICTION. 

2 Public Law 101–479 (104 Stat. 1158) is amended— 

3 (1) by striking section 2(d); and 

4 (2) by adding the following new section at the 

5 end: 

6 ‘‘SEC. 4. REMOVAL OF USE RESTRICTION. 

7 ‘‘(a) The approximately 1-acre portion of the land re8 ferred to in section 3 that is used for purposes of a child 

9 care center, as authorized by this Act, shall not be subject 

10 to the use restriction imposed in the deed referred to in 

11 section 3. 

12 ‘‘(b) Upon enactment of this section, the Secretary 

13 of the Interior shall execute an instrument to carry out 

14 subsection (a).’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 30, 

2015. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2022246EN.01002401.xml

| 29.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/24

---

Corrigendum to Commission Notice - Technical guidance on the climate proofing of infrastructure in the period 2021-2027

(

  Official Journal of the European Union C 373 of 16 September 2021
  )

(2022/C 246/09)

On page 1, in the disclaimer, fourth paragraph,

for:

‘The guidance is also deemed a relevant reference for the climate proofing of infrastructure under Article 2(37) and Article 67(3) j) of Regulation (EU) 2021/1060 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Common Provisions Regulation (CPR)) as well as under the Recovery and Resilience Facility.’,

read:

‘The guidance is also deemed a relevant reference for the climate proofing of infrastructure under Article 2(37) and Article 67(3) j) of Regulation (EU) 2021/1060 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Common Provisions Regulation (CPR)) as well as under the Recovery and Resilience Facility, and for climate proofing under Article 5(5) of Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council (European Climate Law) (OJ L 243, 9.7.2021, p. 1).’.

On page 13, in footnote 10,

for:

‘Certain infrastructure is designated “critical infrastructure” in accordance with Council Directive 2008/114/EC of 8 December 2008 on the identification and designation of European critical infrastructures and the assessment of the need to improve their protection (OJ L 345, 23.12.2008, p. 7) includes the following definition. This guidance on climate proofing can be applied to infrastructure irrespective of whether it is designated “critical infrastructure” or not.’,

read:

‘Certain infrastructure is designated “critical infrastructure” in accordance with Council Directive 2008/114/EC of 8 December 2008 on the identification and designation of European critical infrastructures and the assessment of the need to improve their protection (OJ L 345, 23.12.2008, p. 7). This guidance on climate proofing can be applied to infrastructure irrespective of whether it is designated “critical infrastructure” or not.’.

---
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-16-00713- CV

Jam es C. G uzm an and Glor ia A. Guzm an, App ellants
v. The Ban k of

New York Mellon f/ k/a/ T he Bankof New York as Successor in Intere st to J P M o r g a n C ha s e Ba nk , N . A . , no t I nd iv id ua ll y

bu t So le ly a s Tr us t e e fo rt he

Ho ld e r s o f B e a r Sterns AssetBacked Securities Trust 2006-2, Asse t-Backed Ce rtificates, 2006- 2, Appellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 250 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -GN-1 4-0 0245 6, H ONO RAB LE O RLINDA NARANJO , JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
The cler k’s rec ord in this appea l was due for filing in this Court on October 20, 2016. The Clerk of this Court subsequently notified the appellants that the cler k’s rec ord h ad not been filed due to their failure to p ay o r m ak e arrang ements to pay the district court cler k’s fee s for prepa ring the cler

k’s rec ord. The notice reque sted that the appellants m ak e arr ang ements for the cler k’s record and submit a st atus repor t reg arding this appeal by Dec ember 2, 2016. Fur ther, the notice advised the appellants that their failure to comply with this reque st could result in the dismiss al of this appea l for want of prosec ution. To date, the appellants have not filed a status repor t or otherw ise responde d to this C ourt’s notice, a nd the cler

k’s re cord ha s not been filed. I f the trial c ourt cler

k fails to file the cle rk’s re cord due to the appellants’ f ailure to pay or make arr ang ements to pay for the cler k’s fee for prepa

ring the rec ord, the appellate court mayd ismiss the appea l for want of prosec ution unless the appellants wer e entitled to proceed wi t h o u t

p ay ment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). I n this case , the appellants have not established th at they are entitled to proce ed without pay ment of costs. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145; Tex. R. App. P. 20.1. Be cause the appellants have failed to pay or make arr ang ements to pay the cler k’s fee for prepa

ring the cler k’s re cord, this appe al is dismis sed for want of pr osecution. See Tex. R. App. P . 42.3(b).

__________________________________________ Scott K. Field, Just ice Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Pemberton, and F ield Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: January

6, 2017

2
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Trayone Maurice BURTON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-7241.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 24, 2011.

Decided: March 2, 2011.

Trayone Maurice Burton, Appellant Pro Se. Stanley Duane Ragsdale, John David Rowell, Jane Barrett Taylor, Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

*194Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Trayone Burton appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the order denying his request for transcripts at government expense. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Burton,*No. 3:07-cr-00773-JFA-1 (D.S.C. Aug. 23, 2010). We deny Burton’s motion for transcripts at Government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
#### Mountain Creek Acquisition LLC, Respondent, v Intrawest U.S. Holdings, Inc., Appellant.

[947 NYS2d 470]

*634Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered December 14, 2011, which, inter alia, granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint solely to the extent of dismissing the third cause of action, unanimously modified, on the law, to dismiss the fifth cause of action for fraudulent inducement, and to strike the request for punitive damages, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The parties entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (Agreement) for the purchase of Mountain Creek, Inc. (MCI), a New Jersey vacation resort, for the price of $15 million to be adjusted by, inter alia, the value of MCI’s interim net revenue, to be calculated according to the Agreement. A dispute arose regarding the calculation of the interim net revenue, and plaintiff alleged that defendant refused to resolve the dispute pursuant to the Agreement. Under the circumstances, plaintiff sufficiently pleaded a breach of the Agreement, which provided a specific method for resolving disputes concerning calculations of the interim net revenue *(see Furia v Furia,*116 AD2d 694 [1986]).

Defendant represented in the Agreement that its financial statements had accurately presented MCI’s results of operations for fiscal year 2009, and plaintiff allegedly later learned that this amount was materially different, especially as concerned MCI’s obligations, due to the understatement of the company’s liability for warranty reserves, and its insurance expenses. Defendant further represented in the Agreement that it had made no changes to its tax practices, when, according to the complaint, it had, thereby preventing plaintiff from prosecuting a tax appeal. Thus, plaintiff sufficiently pleaded a breach of these sections of the Agreement.

Plaintiffs claim alleging fraudulent inducement is barred by the specific disclaimer in the Agreement *(see Danann Realty Corp. v Harris,*5 NY2d 317, 320 [1959]), and by its failure to establish reasonable reliance on the alleged oral representations by the named employees *(see HSH Nordbank AG v UBS AG,*95 AD3d 185 [2012]). Plaintiff, while suspecting that the reported insurance expense figure was “too low,” failed to make use of the means of verification that were available to it, such as examining any further documentation, reviewing the books of MCI, or traveling to MCI’s offices to inspect its financials *(see UST Private Equity Invs. Fund v Salomon Smith Barney,*288 AD2d 87, 88 [2001]; *Rodas v Manitaras,*159 AD2d 341, 343 [1990]).

*635Plaintiffs request for punitive damages is stricken, since this was a private transaction, and plaintiff has not alleged any harm to the public nor has there been a showing of a high degree of moral turpitude *(see Steinhardt Group v Citicorp,*272 AD2d 255, 257 [2000]). Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Andrias, Acosta and Freedman, JJ.
I]NITED STATES OF AMERICA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OT' HOMELAND SECURITY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

Address ofAdministrahve Law Judge Docketing Center:

ALJ Docketing Center

U.S. Custom House

40 South Gay Street, Room 414

Baltimore, MD 2l 2024022

Email: alidocketcenter(riuscs.mil

Phone: (410) 962-5100

Toll Free: (866) 612-7524 [6IA-SKCG]

Fax: (410) 962-1746

Toll Free Fax: (877\ 243-3453 [CGE-FILEI

COMPLAINANT:

UNITED STATES COAST GUARI)

RESPONDENT: C,uentin Alan Silve DOCKET NUMBER 2023-0 1,10

WITHDRA\4 AL FROM DOCKET CG ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY NI-IMBER

7-.r r 9l5l

The Coast Guard initiated an administrative proceeding by filing a Complaint on April 6, 2023,

seeking Revocation of Respondent's Merchant Mariner Credential.

On April 13,2023, the Coast Guard filed a Notice of Withdrawal from docket as:

The Coast Cuard has confirmed through the Transpoflation Sccurity Adrninistration (TSA),

Respondent applied for a new Transpoftation Worker Idenlilication Credential (TWIC), the TSA

reevaluated Respondent pursuant to 49 CFR $ 1572, detemined Respondenl is no longer a

security threat, and issued Respondent a neu'TWIC. Respondent is no longer a Security Risk as

described by,16 U.S.C. $ 7703(5).

Done and Dated Ap il 13,2023 at

Baltimore, MD

.ru.74"r--

Lauren M. Meus

Hearing Docket Clerk

U.S. Coast Guard

By Direction of the Chief Administrative Law

Judge

This matter is removed from the docket and closed without prejudice effective this date.