alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010056EN.01000901.xml

| 6.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 56/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 56/9

---

COMMISSION DECISION

of 5 March 2010

appointing one member of the European Statistical Advisory Committee

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 56/07

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Decision No 234/2008/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2008 establishing the European Statistical Advisory Committee and repealing Council Decision 91/116/EEC (1), and in particular Article 4(1)(a) thereof,

1

After consultation of the Council,

After consultation of the European Parliament,

Whereas:

| (1) | The European Statistical Advisory Committee (ESAC) comprises 24 members. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The European Statistical Advisory Committee (ESAC) comprises 24 members.

| (2) | According to Article 4(1) of Decision No 234/2008/EC, 12 members of the ESAC have to be appointed by the Commission, after consulting the European Parliament and the Council. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

According to Article 4(1) of Decision No 234/2008/EC, 12 members of the ESAC have to be appointed by the Commission, after consulting the European Parliament and the Council.

| (3) | By its Decision 2009/304/EC of 30 March 2009 (2), the Commission has appointed 12 members of the ESAC. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

By its Decision 2009/304/EC of 30 March 2009 (2), the Commission has appointed 12 members of the ESAC.

2

| (4) | As one of these members has resigned, the Commission, after having duly consulted the European Parliament and the Council, shall now appoint a new member of the ESAC, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

As one of these members has resigned, the Commission, after having duly consulted the European Parliament and the Council, shall now appoint a new member of the ESAC,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Denis Durand is hereby appointed as a member of the ESAC for a term of five years.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

Done at Brussels, 5 March 2010.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  OJ L 73, 15.3.2008, p. 13.

1

(2)  OJ L 84, 31.3.2009, p. 44.

2

---
#### Muriel Siebert & Co., Inc., Appellant, v Intuit Inc., Respondent.

Submitted February 13, 2007;

decided February 20, 2007

Motion by National Employment Lawyers Association/New York for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted. Two copies of the brief may be served and 24 copies filed within seven days.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Coast GuardU.S. Department of Homeland Security

Search
Search

Search

-  Home    -  News Room             
  -  Reserve             
  -  Forcecom             
  -  Operations             
  -  Mission Support             
  -  Atlantic Area             
  -  Pacific Area             
  -  History 
-  Units    -  Organization             
  -  Coast Guard A to Z             
  -  Atlantic Area             
  -  Pacific Area             
  -  Force Readiness Command 
-  Leadership    -  Commandant’s Initiatives             
  -  Senior Leadership             
  -  Deputy Commandant for Operations             
  -  Deputy Commandant for Mission Support             
  -  Atlantic Area Commander             
  -  Pacific Area Commander             
  -  Reserve             
  -  Auxiliary 
-  Resources    -  CG Support             
  -  Legal      -  JoinCGJAG             
    -  Legal_Assistance        -  Find-A-Legal-Assistance-Lawyer             
      -  FAQ 
  -  Civil Rights             
  -  Work-Life             
  -  Administrative Law Judges      -  Virtual Hearing 
  -  Newsroom             
  -  Family             
  -  Library             
  -  CG Web Mail             
  -  Return 2 Service      -  FAQ 
-  Community    -  Art Program             
  -  Girl Scouts / Boy Scouts      -  Eagle Scout Recognition 
  -  Coast Guard Band             
  -  Coast Guard Cities             
  -  Honor Guard             
  -  JROTC      -  NEWS 
  -  Special Programs      -  Industry Academy        -  Contacts             
      -  2018 
  -  Trademark             
  -  Resources      -  History             
    -  CGC Eagle 
-  Mariners    -  National Vessel Documentation Center             
  -  National Maritime Center             
  -  National Pollution Funds Center      -  NRD        -  NRD_FAQs             
      -  Trustee_Links             
      -  NRD_DOCS             
      -  About_NRD_Funding 
  -  Boating Safety 
-  doing business		 
-  Join		 
-  Recruiting		 
-  contact		 
-  About		 

HomeCommunitySpecial Programs

**

                      - FOIA
                      - Privacy Policy
                      - MHS Notice of Privacy Practices
                      - Accessibility
                      - No FEAR
                      - Whistleblower Protection
                      - U.S. Department of Homeland Security
                      - DHS Office of Inspector General
                      - WhiteHouse.gov
                      - USA.gov

### Stay Connected

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                                SOLOPOINT, INC.

                      WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES COMPUTATION

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           YEAR ENDED DECEMBER
                                                                   31,
                                                           -------------------
                                                             1996      1995
                                                           --------- ---------
     <S>                                                   <C>       <C>
     Weighted average common shares outstanding........... 1,359,679   413,559
     Common equivalent shares from stock options,
      warrants, and Series A-6 and A-7 preferred stock
      granted or issued during the twelve-month period
      prior to the Company's Initial Public Offering......        -- 1,050,185
     Common equivalent shares attributable to:
      Convertible preferred stock, as if converted........ 1,102,036   510,585
                                                           --------- ---------
                                                           2,461,715 1,974,329
                                                           ========= =========
</TABLE>
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10
- 09
- 00393
- CV
DONALD FOSTER , Appellant
v. RICK THALER , Appellee

From the 278th District Court Walker County, Texas Trial Court No. 24,769

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Donald Foster appeals the dismissal of his l awsuit as frivolous under Chapter 14
of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code. He contends in two issues that the court erred because: (1) his pending recusal motion should have first been addressed; and (2) his
lawsuit is not frivolous. We will affirm. Rule of Civil Procedure 18a(b) states in pertinent part , “ On the day the motion [to recuse] is filed, copies shall be served on all other parties or their counsel of record, together with a notice that movant expects the motion to be presented to the judge threeFoster v. Thaler Page 2

days after the filing of such motion unless otherwise ordered by the judge. ” T EX
. R. C IV
. P. 18a(b). If a party fails to provide this notice, he waives the right to complain of a judge’s failure to recuse himself. Carson v. Serrano , 96 S.W.3d 697 , 698 (Tex. App.

— Texarkana 20 03, pet. denied) . Because Foster failed to provide this notice, he waived the right to complain of the judge’s failure to recuse himself. Id. Thus, we overrule his
first issue. Chapter 14 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code applies to suits filed by an inmate and accompanied by an affidavit or unsworn declaration of inability to pay

costs. 1 T EX
. C IV
. P RAC
. & R EM
. C ODE A NN . § 14.002(a) (Vernon 20 02); Hamilton v.
Williams , 298 S.W.3d 334, 339 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth 20 09, p et. denied). The trial court may dismiss such a suit if the inmate fails to comply with the requirements of Chapter
14. See Hamilton , 298 S.W.3d at 339. Section 14.004 requires the inmate to file an affidavit or unsworn declaration listing each suit (ot her than suits under the Family Code) the inmate previously filed.
T EX
. C IV
. P RAC
. & R EM
. C ODE A NN . § 14.004 (Vernon 20 02). Because Foster did not comply with section 14.004, the court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing his suit.
See Hamilton , 2 98 S.W.3d at 339. Thus, we overrule his second issue. We affirm the judgment.

FELIPE REYNA Justice

1 Chapter 14 does not apply to suits filed under the Family Code. T EX

. C IV
. P RAC

. & R EM
. C ODE A NN . § 14.002(b) (Vernon 20 02).Foster v. Thaler Page 3

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Reyna, and Justice Davis Affirmed Opinion delivered and filed October 13, 2010 [CV06]
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

OFFICIAL BUSINESS

STATE OF TEXASA

PENALTY FOR - ~

12/15/2014 PRIVATE USE '£:"

GOELLER, GE^Mey. Tr. Ct^ Vo^O^M^kf^0FROM %°_§2 75V^01

On this cMWHQtaffcation for 11 CV^WnLof Habeas Corpus has been received

'Qourt. '' >,

1 Abel Acosta, Clerk

GERALD C. GOELLFR

Q ^S^/" ^EEEmay PITNEY BOWES

02 1M $ 00.26s

0004279596 DEC 1 8 2014

.MAILED FROM i

UTF
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           8,810
<SECURITIES>                                    18,239
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,586
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,730
<INVENTORY>                                     13,340
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                52,933
<PP&E>                                          13,645
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,060
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  64,077
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,536
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        26,448
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,469
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    64,077
<SALES>                                         37,634
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,634
<CGS>                                           21,814
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,579
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   168
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,635
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,891
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,744
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,744
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.43



</TABLE>
Listen

# Videos

Please note that the videos below use auto generated closed captioning technology.

Review the YouTube Terms of Service and the Google Privacy Policy.

----

              - November 8, 2022Commission on the Social Status of Black Men and Boys to Hold Virtual Roundtable  11-8-22  @ 1PM ET 
              - August 19, 2022Commission Business Meeting Friday, August 19, 2022, 10:00 am EST. 
              - July 22, 2022Commission on Civil Rights Business Meeting  Friday July 22, 2022 at 12pm EST. 
              - July 8, 2022Commission on the Social Status of Black Men and Boys to Hold Virtual Roundtable 7-8-22  @ 1:30PM 
              - April 22, 2022Commission on the Social Status of Black Men and Boys (CSSBMB) Public Business Meeting 4/22/22 @1 PM 
              - April 8, 2022Commission Business Meeting Friday, April 8, 2022 - 12:00 PM 
              - January 14, 2022Commission on the Social Status of Black Men and Boys (CSSBMB) Public Business Meeting 
              - December 10, 2021Civil Rights Implications of Disaster Relief: Hurricane María in Puerto Rico 

-    First  
-    Previous  
-  1 
-  2 
-  3 
-  4 
-  5 
-   ...  
-   Next  
-   Last
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Paid, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned,
in their respective capacities as capacity as President and CEO of the Company
and as CFO of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Gregory Rotman

---------------------------------
Gregory Rotman
President and CEO
March 31, 2008

/s/ Richard Rotman

---------------------------------
Richard Rotman
Chief Financial Officer
March 31, 2008
Listen

# Comités consultivos

                      -  Acerca de
La Comisión trata de garantizar que los comités consultivos sean ampliamente diversos y representen una variedad de orígenes, habilidades, experiencias y perspectivas. Esta diversidad fomenta un debate enérgico y una exploración completa de los temas. Todos los nombramientos se realizan de forma no discriminatoria.
Ver FAQs 
                      -  Afiliación
Los comisarios son responsables de los nombramientos de los comités consultivos y tratan de garantizar que los comités sean ampliamente diversos y representen una variedad de orígenes, habilidades, experiencias y perspectivas.

Comisiones que buscan candidatos
 
                      -  Oficina de la Unidad de Programas Regionales
The Commission's La oficina de la Unidad de Programas Regionales está situada en Chicago y cuenta con un director, analistas de derechos civiles y otro personal administrativo. Coordinan las operaciones de la Comisión en las regiones de Estados Unidos y ayudan a los Comités Consultivos en sus actividades.
 
                      -  Reuniones
Anuncios de reuniones, materiales informativos y convocatorias de comentarios públicos
Ver Reuniones 
                      -  Noticias
Anuncios sobre nombramientos de miembros, nuevos comités, publicación de informes, etc.
Ver Noticias 
                      -  Informes
Conclusiones y recomendaciones presentadas a la Comisión para abordar los problemas de derechos civiles
Ver Informes 
                      -  Más recursos
Recursos de los miembros del Comité

​​​​​Lista de miembros actuales (por Estado)

Informes del Comité Consultivo Federal (FACA) Estado por Estado
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 237 

AN ACT 

To authorize the revocation or denial of passports and passport cards to individuals affiliated with foreign terrorist 

organizations, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 237 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘FTO Passport Revoca3 tion Act of 2015’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REVOCATION OR DENIAL OF PASSPORTS TO INDI5 VIDUALS AFFILIATED WITH FOREIGN TER6 RORIST ORGANIZATIONS. 

7 The Act entitled ‘‘An Act to regulate the issue and 

8 validity of passports, and for other purposes’’, approved 

9 July 3, 1926 (22 U.S.C. 211a et seq.), commonly known 

10 as the ‘‘Passport Act of 1926’’, is amended by adding at 

11 the end the following: 

12 ‘‘SEC. 4. AUTHORITY TO DENY OR REVOKE PASSPORT. 

13 ‘‘(a) INELIGIBILITY.— 

14 ‘‘(1) ISSUANCE.—Except as provided under 

15 subsection (b), the Secretary of State may refuse to 

16 issue a passport to any individual whom the Sec17 retary has determined has aided, assisted, abetted, 

18 or otherwise helped an organization the Secretary 

19 has designated as a foreign terrorist organization 

20 pursuant to section 219 of the Immigration and Na21 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189). 

22 ‘‘(2) REVOCATION.—The Secretary of State 

23 may revoke a passport previously issued to any indi24 vidual described in paragraph (1). 

25 ‘‘(b) REPORT.— 
3 

•HR 237 EH

1 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—If the Secretary of State 

2 refuses to issue or revokes a passport pursuant to 

3 subsection (a), the Secretary shall, not later than 30 

4 days after such refusal or revocation, submit to the 

5 Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Rep6 resentatives and the Committee on Foreign Rela7 tions of the Senate a report on such refusal or rev8 ocation, as the case may be. 

9 ‘‘(2) FORM.—The report submitted under para10 graph (1) may be submitted in classified or unclassi11 fied form.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 21, 2015. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 237 

AN ACT 

To authorize the revocation or denial of passports 

poses. foreign terrorist organizations, and for other purand passport cards to individuals affiliated with
Exhibit 32.1

Informational Addendum to Report on Form 10-Q

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

Not Filed Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

The undersigned Chief Executive Officer of OYO Geospace Corporation does hereby certify as follows:

Solely for the purpose of meeting the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and solely to the extent this certification may
be applicable to this Report on Form 10-Q, the undersigned hereby certify that this Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in this
Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OYO Geospace Corporation.



/s/ Gary D. OwensName:

Gary D. OwensTitle:

Chief Executive OfficerMay 8, 2007
# C_2021360EN.01000201.xml

| 8.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 360/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 360/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10336 — PORR/Doka/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 360/02)

On 3 September 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in German language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10336. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10336. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### Loomis J. Grossman et al., Appellants, v John M. Clarey et al., Respondents.

In an action to recover damages for the breach of a written agreement, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Wood, J.), entered August 5, 1986, which denied their motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint pursuant to CPLR 3213.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

*444Several disputed factual issues preclude an award of summary judgment. Among these issues is the question of whether the plaintiffs’ limited partnership interests were transferred for units in a certain master limited partnership pursuant to an exchange transaction, and whether this transfer of interests operated to terminate the defendants’ obligations under paragraph 6 of the agreement in question. Since the agreement, drawn by the plaintiffs, is ambiguous on this issue, and the intent of the parties depends upon a choice between reasonable inferences to be drawn from extrinsic evidence, summary judgment, at least in the absence of any opportunity to conduct discovery, is inappropriate *(see, River Park Assocs. v Meyerbank Elec. Co.,*116 AD2d 709; *Leighton’s Inc. v Century Circuit,*95 AD2d 681).

Furthermore, contrary to the holding of the Supreme Court, we hold that the instrument involved was not one for the payment of money only within the meaning of CPLR 3213. A review of the agreement sued upon indicates that it provided for more than a simple unconditional promise by the defendants to pay a sum of money at a certain time or over a stated period *(see, Maglich v Saxe, Bacon & Bolan,*97 AD2d 19, 22). The agreement obligates the defendants to extend certain advance payments or loans to the plaintiffs only in those months in which distributions pursuant to various limited partnership agreements do not reach a stated amount, and requires the plaintiffs to repay or give credit for these advances in those months when the limited partnership distributions exceed that stated amount. Therefore, the agreement is not an instrument for the payment of money only and does not qualify for the accelerated treatment accorded such instruments under CPLR 3213 *(see, Interman Indus. Prods. v R. S. M. Electron Power,*37 NY2d 151, 155). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Brown and Lawrence, JJ., concur.