alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Mitchell Benesowitz, Appellant, v Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al., Respondents.

Submitted April 30, 2007;

decided May 3, 2007

Motion by the Life Insurance Council of New York, Inc. for leave to appear amicus curiae on consideration of the certified question herein granted only to the extent that the proposed brief is accepted as filed.
#### THOMAS v. THOMAS.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

December 18, 1896.)

Action by Franklin C. Thomas against Dora M. Thomas.

No opinion. Motion denied. See 41 N. Y. Supp. 276.
# C_2021509EN.01000401.xml

| 17.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 509/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 509/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10504 – EQT / H&F / ZOOPLUS)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 509/04)

On 8 December 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10504. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10504. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Document

JOINDER TO GUARANTY


Dated to be effective as of: June 23, 2021


The undersigned, JET YARD SOLUTIONS, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company (the “Additional Guarantor”), hereby joins in the Amended and Restated Guaranty dated as of March 28, 2019 (such Guaranty as amended to date and as it may be further amended, modified, supplemented or restated from time to time being the “Guaranty”) made by certain “Subsidiary” signatories thereto (collectively the “Other Guarantors”) in favor of MINNESOTA BANK & TRUST, a Minnesota state banking corporation (the “Bank”), pursuant to which such Other Guarantors jointly and severally guaranty the payment and performance of all “Obligations” of AIR T, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Borrower”), to the Bank, which Obligations include, without limitation, all “Obligations” under that certain Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of June 26, 2020, by and between the Borrower and the Bank (such Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, as it may be amended, modified, supplemented or restated from time to time being the “Credit Agreement;” capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein being used herein as therein defined), and as a result of such joinder, the undersigned Additional Guarantor, together with the Other Guarantors, jointly and severally guaranties the payment and performance of such Obligations  in accordance with the terms of the Guaranty.  


Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the undersigned Additional Guarantor agrees with the Bank that, as long as any portion of the Obligations shall be outstanding, it shall perform and observe the affirmative and negative covenants respectively set forth in Articles 6 and 7 of the Credit Agreement that apply to the undersigned as a Subsidiary of the Borrower or as a Loan Party and that such covenants are incorporated herein by reference as though fully set forth herein.


The undersigned Additional Guarantor represents and warrants to the Bank that each of the representations and warranties in the Credit Agreement applicable to it as a Subsidiary of the Borrower or as a Loan Party or words of like import referring to such undersigned are true and correct as of the date hereof. 




[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
084126\039\5722308.v1







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Joinder to Guaranty to be duly executed as of the date first set forth above.






						
		JET YARD SOLUTIONS, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company 

		By:    /s/ Dave Bixler        
Name:     Dave Bixler
Its:     President















						
		AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED:


Minnesota Bank & Trust, a Minnesota state banking corporation

		By:       /s/ Dianne Wegscheid    
Name:  Dianne Wegscheid
Title:    Senior Vice President
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD,

Complainant,

vs

CHARLES DALE TIPPS, JR.,

Respondent.

Docket Number 2023-0179

CG Enforcement Activity Number 7688833

Bv: Honorable Walter J. Brudzinski. Chief Administrative Law Judge

Appearances:

LT MICHAEL D. ROBINSON

USCG Marine Safety Unit Texas City

For the Coast Guard

CHARLES DALE TIPPS, JR., Pro se

For the Respondent

CONSENT ORDER

Issued: May 25,2023
APPROVING SETTLEMENT AG

On May I 8, 2023, the parties in this case submitted a Motion for Approval of Settlement

Agreement and Entry ofConsent Order to be approved as a settlement ofthe case under 33

c.F.R. $ 20.502.

I have carefully reviewed the terms of the Settlement Agreement and find it is fair and

reasonable and in substantial compliance with the requirements of33 C.F.R. $ 20.502.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the record, it is hereby ORDERI,D, the Settlement Agreement is

APPROVED in full and incorporated herein by reference. This Consent Order shall constitute

full, final, and complete adjudication of this proceeding.

Done and dated May 25,2023

New York, NY

ue.// ,3,u6---A

HON. WALTER J. BRUDZINSKI

CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW ruDGE

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD
* After examining the briefs and the record, we have concluded that oral argument is

unnecessary. Thus the appeal is submitted on the briefs and the record. See F ED

. R. A PP

. P.

34(a)(2)(C). 

# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted February 9, 2011 *

Decided February 9, 2011

Before

FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge

MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge

ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge

No. 10

‐ 2580

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

‐ Appellee,

v.

JERMAINE JONES,

Defendant

‐ Appellant

. Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Northern District of Illinois,

Eastern Division.

No. 09 CR 565

‐ 2

Elaine E. Bucklo,

Judge

.

O R D E R

Jermaine Jones and his wife stole more than 2,100 Social Security numbers from her

workplace and used this information to obtain loans over the Internet. Jones pleaded guilty

to wire fraud, see 18 U.S.C. § 1343, and was sentenced to a below

‐ guidelines term of

58 months’ imprisonment. In calculating Jones’s imprisonment range, the district court

followed our decision in United States v. Demaree

, 459 F.3d 791 (7th Cir. 2006), and used the

guidelines manual in effect on the date of sentencing. If the court had used the guidelines NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1No. 10

‐ 2580 Page 2

manual in effect when Jones committed his crime, however, Jones’s offense level would

have been lower—and thus too his imprisonment range.

On appeal Jones asks us to overrule Demaree

, which held not only that the district

court must use the guidelines manual in effect on the date of sentencing but also that the Ex

Post Facto Clause poses no obstacle. This is not the first time we have been invited to

abandon Demaree

, but we have yet to be offered a compelling reason. See, e.g., United States

v. Favara

, 615 F.3d 824, 829 (7th Cir. 2010), petition for cert. filed sub nom. Custable v. United

States

, 79 U.S.L.W. 3310 (U.S. Nov. 9, 2010) (No. 10

‐ 631); United States v. Nurek

, 578 F.3d 618,

625

‐ 26 (7th Cir. 2009), cert. denied

, 130 S. Ct. 2093 (2010); United States v. Patterson

, 576 F.3d

431, 444 (7th Cir. 2009), cert. denied

, 130 S. Ct. 1284 (2010). In fact Jones does not even offer a

new argument. He acknowledges, though, that he does not anticipate our upsetting

precedent but simply wishes to preserve the issue for presentation to the Supreme Court.

AFFIRMED.
Order entered March 1 2 , 2015

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 14

- 00645

- CR

JESUS CASTILLO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court C ause No. F13

- 70597

- W



### O RDER

The Court GRANTS the State’s second motion t o exten d the time to file the State’s brief.

We ORDER the Clerk of the Court to file the brief tendered as of the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following agreement under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit comments, relevant information, or documents regarding the agreement to the Secretary by email at *Secretary@fmc.gov,* or by mail, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573. Comments will be most helpful to the Commission if received within 12 days of the date this notice appears in the **Federal Register**. Copies of agreement are available through the Commission's website (*www.fmc.gov*) or by contacting the Office of Agreements at (202) 523-5793 or *tradeanalysis@fmc.gov.*

*Agreement No.:* 201372.

*Agreement Name:* Liberty/Wallenius Wilhelmsen Ocean/Eukor Car Carriers Space Charter Agreement.

*Parties:* Eukor Car Carriers, Inc.; Liberty Global Logistics LLC; And Wallenius Wilhelmsen Ocean AS.

*Filing Party:* Wayne Rohde; Cozen O'Connor.

*Synopsis:* The agreement would authorize the parties to charter space to/from one another on an “as needed/as available” basis in all trades in the foreign commerce of the United States.

*Proposed Effective Date:* 10/22/2021.

*Location: https://www2.fmc.gov/​FMC.Agreements.Web/​Public/​AgreementHistory/​50508.*

Dated: September 10, 2021.

Rachel E. Dickon,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2021-19922 Filed 9-14-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730-02-P
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

** **

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Blount International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James S. Osterman,Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(i)            The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periodsexpressed in the report.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to BlountInternational, Inc. and will be retained by Blount International, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

 

Date: August 8, 2008

 

 
| /s/ James S. Osterman   |   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|
| James S. Osterman       |   |
| Chairman and            |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Initial Review Group; Health, Behavior, and Context Study Section.                    

*Date:*                         October 18, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, 6710B Rockledge Drive, Room 2137C, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Video-Assisted Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Kimberly L. Houston, M.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, 6710B Rockledge Drive, Room 2137C, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 827-4902,                         *kimberly.houston@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 15, 2021. 

Melanie J. Pantoja,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-20263 Filed 9-17-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
COLORADO RIVER NEAR CAMEO, CO.Latitude: 39.239Longitude: -108.266Elevation: 4813.73

COLORADO RIVER NEAR CAMEO, CO.

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Middle Fork Camp Site Page...



Middle Fork Camp

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Arapaho Ridge Site Page...



Arapaho Ridge

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Never Summer Site Page...



Never Summer

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Mccoy Park Site Page...



Mccoy Park

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Beaver Ck Village Site Page...



Beaver Ck Village

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Bear River Site Page...



Bear River

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Chapman Tunnel Site Page...



Chapman Tunnel

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Elliot Ridge Site Page...



Elliot Ridge

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Upper Taylor Site Page...



Upper Taylor

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Fool Creek Site Page...



Fool Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to High Lonesome Site Page...



High Lonesome

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Sawtooth Site Page...



Sawtooth

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Arrow Site Page...



Arrow

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Bear Lake Site Page...



Bear Lake

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Berthoud Summit Site Page...



Berthoud Summit

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Bison Lake Site Page...



Bison Lake

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Brumley Site Page...



Brumley

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Burro Mountain Site Page...



Burro Mountain

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Columbine Site Page...



Columbine

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Copper Mountain Site Page...



Copper Mountain

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Fremont Pass Site Page...



Fremont Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Grizzly Peak Site Page...



Grizzly Peak

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Hoosier Pass Site Page...



Hoosier Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Independence Pass Site Page...



Independence Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Ivanhoe Site Page...



Ivanhoe

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Kiln Site Page...



Kiln

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Lake Irene Site Page...



Lake Irene

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Loveland Basin Site Page...



Loveland Basin

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Lynx Pass Site Page...



Lynx Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Mc Clure Pass Site Page...



Mc Clure Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Nast Lake Site Page...



Nast Lake

Courtesy NRCS - Go to North Lost Trail Site Page...



North Lost Trail

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Phantom Valley Site Page...



Phantom Valley

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Schofield Pass Site Page...



Schofield Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Stillwater Creek Site Page...



Stillwater Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Summit Ranch Site Page...



Summit Ranch

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Vail Mountain Site Page...



Vail Mountain

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Willow Creek Pass Site Page...



Willow Creek Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Buffalo Park Site Page...



Buffalo Park

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Jackwhacker Gulch Site Page...



Jackwhacker Gulch

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Michigan Creek Site Page...



Michigan Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Jones Pass Site Page...



Jones Pass
### M A N D A T E

TO THE 148TH DISTRIC T COURT of NUECES COUNTY, GREET INGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, on the 8th day of October, 2015 , the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Trinity Ringelstein, Ap pellant,

v.

The State of Texas Appellee.

CAUSE NO. 13

- 15

- 00397

- CR (Tr.Ct.No. 12CR2436

- E)

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION in accordance with its opinion

.

We further order this decision cert ified below for observance.

October 8, 2015.



WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Rogelio Valdez, Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals, with the seal thereof affixed, at the City of E dinburg, Texas this 28th day of December, 2015.

Dorian E. Ramirez, CLERK
Order filed August 1 6 , 2019

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 19

- 00506

- CV

____________ MICHAEL REEVES , Appellant

V.

CENTRAL HOUSTON NISS AN , Appellee

On Appeal from the 113th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2018

- 55206



### ORDER The court reporter responsible for preparing the record has informed the court appellant has not request ed her to prepare the reporter ’ s record. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(b)(2). If appellant does not request and pay ( or make arrangements to pay ) the court reporter for preparing the record (if not filing as an indigent party) and provide this court with proof of the request as well as payment or indigency, we may consider
and decid e those issues or points that do not require a reporter ’ s record. See Tex. App. P.37.3(c). Such proof must be provided by August 30, 2019

. PER CURIAM
#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Storage                    
csv

      Inflow                    
csv

      Total Release                    
csv

      Pool Elevation                    
csv

      Release Volume                    
csv

      Delta Storage                    
csv

      Inflow Volume                    
csv

      Evaporation                    
csv

      Area                    
csv

#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Storage                    
json

      Inflow                    
json

      Total Release                    
json

      Pool Elevation                    
json

      Release Volume                    
json

      Delta Storage                    
json

      Inflow Volume                    
json

      Evaporation                    
json

      Area                    
json
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7685

JOHN DAVID MCBRIDE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STEVEN DOTSON, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District

Judge. (CA-03-71)

Submitted: February 12, 2004 Decided: February 20, 2004

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John David McBride, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

John David McBride appeals the district court’s orders

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint, and denying his

motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. See McBride v. Dotson, No. CA-03-71 (E.D.

Va. Aug. 25, 2003; Sept. 26, 2003; Oct. 9, 2003). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED