alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021034EN.01000101.xml

| 1.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 34/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 34/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10077 — Macquarie Bank/Mitsubishi UFJ Lease & Finance Company/Vestone Capital)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 34/01)

On 25 January 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10077. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10077. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### Melanie Snuszki, as Administrator of the Estate of Peggy A.B. Wright, Deceased, for Benefit of Ian Wright, Respondent, v Thomas Wright, Appellant, and Andrew M. Cuomo, as Attorney General of the State of New York, Intervenor-Respondent.

Submitted April 30, 2007;

decided May 8, 2007

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.

Judge Pigott taking no part.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED January 24, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-60126 Summary Calendar

ASTER MARIA NOOR MASIH, Petitioner,

versus JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.

-------------------- Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A95 537 679

-------------------- Before JONES, BARKSDALE and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Aster Maria Noor Masih petitions for review of an order by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the decision of the Immigration Judge (IJ) to deny her application for asylum and withholding of removal under the Immigration and Nationality Act and her claim for withholding of removal under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). Noor argues that the IJ erred in finding that her testimony was not credible. She argues further that she is entitled to asylum and withholding of removal because she willNo. 04-60126 -2- be subjected to persecution and torture based on her religious beliefs and activities if she is returned to Pakistan. Where, as here, the BIA summarily affirms without opinion and essentially adopts the IJ’s decision, we review the IJ’s decision. See Efe v. Ashcroft , 293 F.3d 899, 903 (5th Cir. 2002). The IJ articulated cogent reasons, supported by substantial evidence in the record, for rejecting Noor’s testimony as lacking credibility. See Chun v. INS , 40 F.3d 76, 79 (5th Cir. 1994). The record does not compel reversal of the IJ’s adverse credibility determination and his concomitant determination that Noor has not carried her burden of proving her entitlement to asylum, withholding of removal, or relief under the CAT. See Efe , 293 F.3d at 907; Girma v. INS , 283 F.3d 664, 666-67 (5th Cir. 2002). Because the IJ’s finding that Noor’s testimony was not credible is sufficient grounds for affirming the BIA’s decision, we need not reach the IJ’s alternative ruling. See Chun , 40 F.3d at 79.
PETITION DENIED.
#### Wade C. Moseley v. Robert S. Farrell.

In calculating interest, the court followed the rule of adding interest until the first payment to the principal, and deducting the payment from the amount thus produced; and, if the balance exceeded $100, the district court had jurisdiction.

Error from Brazos. The ease was tried before Hon. John A. Buckholts, one of the district judges.

The only point in the ease is stated with sufficient terseness by the chief justice. The question of jurisdiction was not raised in the court below, unless it was by general demurrer. There was no assignment of errors.

*Wade G. Moseley,*for plaintiff in error,

argued that the credit reduced the debt under $100.

*HM 8?*Hill, for defendant in error,

suggested delay.

Morrill, G. J.

—The note sued on was due 24th June, 1862,

Galling for---------------------------------------$116 66

Interest to 24th October, 1868, at 10 per cent---- 38 86

155 52

Paid 24th October, 1865-------------------------- 25 00

Balance due-----------------1--------------------$130 52

This calculation shows that the district court had jurisdiction when the suit was brought. There is no error. The appeal was evidently taken for delay.

Judgment affirmed with damages.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 23

- 00327

- CR

EX PARTE Martin MARCOS

- CALLEJAS
, Appellant

From the County Court
, Jim Hogg County, Texas Trial Court No. 1034C Honorable Greg Perkes , Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ
, JUSTICE CHAPA , AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order denying Martin Marcos

- Callejas’s application for pretrial writ of habeas corpus is REVERSED, and this cause is REMANDED to the tr ial court with instructions to discharge Marcos

- Callejas from bail and dismiss with prejudice the information charging Marcos

- Callejas with misdemeanor criminal trespass.

SIGNED May 15 , 2024.

_____________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
----

----

| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      March 16, 2009                  |   |                                                      |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|                                       |   |                                                      |
|                                       |   |                                                      |
| /s/      Thomas X. Geisel                  |   | /s/      Dan A. Chila                                     |
| Thomas      X. Geisel                      |   | Dan      A. Chila                                         |
| President      and Chief Executive Officer |   | Executive      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|                                       |   |                                                      |

----

----
STATUTORY AUTHORITIES

Title 46 Sec. 2103. Superintendence of the merchant marine

The Secretary has general superintendence over the merchant marine of the United States and of merchant 

marine personnel insofar as the enforcement of this subtitle is concerned and insofar as those vessels and 

personnel are not subject, under other law, to the supervision of another official of the United States 

Government. In the interests of marine safety and seamen's welfare, the Secretary shall enforce this subtitle 

and shall carry out correctly and uniformly administer this subtitle. The Secretary may prescribe regulations 

to carry out the provisions of this subtitle. 

Title 46 Sec. 2107. Civil penalty procedures

(a) After notice and an opportunity for a hearing, a person found by the Secretary to have violated this 

subtitle or a regulation prescribed under this subtitle for which a civil penalty is provided, is liable to the 

United States Government for the civil penalty provided. The amount of the civil penalty shall be assessed 

by the Secretary by written notice. In determining the amount of the penalty, the Secretary shall consider the 

nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the prohibited acts committed and, with respect to the violator, 

the degree of culpability, any history of prior offenses, ability to pay, and other matters that justice requires. 

(b) The Secretary may compromise, modify, or remit, with or without consideration, a civil penalty under 

this subtitle until the assessment is referred to the Attorney General. (c) If a person fails to pay an 

assessment of a civil penalty after it has become final, the Secretary may refer the matter to the Attorney 

General for collection in an appropriate district court of the United States.
Exhibit 32.3



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Secure Computing Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Timothy J. Steinkopf, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Timothy J. Steinkopf                         
|Timothy J. Steinkopf                             
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|November 8, 2004
Listen

# Advisory Committees

                      -  About
The Commission maintains 56 State and U.S. Territory Advisory Committees, one in each state, the District of Columbia, and the five U.S. Territories. Each is composed of citizen volunteers familiar with local and state civil rights issues. The members assist the Commission with its fact-finding, investigative, and information dissemination functions.
View FAQs 
                      -  Membership
Commissioners are responsible for appointments to the advisory committees and seek to ensure committees are broadly diverse and represent a variety of backgrounds, skills, experiences and perspectives.

Committees Seeking Applicants
 
                      -  Regional Programs Unit Office
The Commission's Regional Programs Unit office is located in Chicago, and is staffed by a director, civil rights analysts, and other administrative personnel. They coordinate the Commission's operations in regions across the U.S. and assist Advisory Committees in their activities.
 
                      -  Meetings
Meeting announcements, briefing materials, and calls for public comment
View Meetings 
                      -  News
Announcements on member appointments, new committees, report releases, and more
View News 
                      -  Reports
Findings and recommendations submitted to the Commission to address civil rights concerns
View Reports 
                      -  More Resources
Committee Member Resources

​​​​​List of Current Members (by State)

State-by-State Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) Reports
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 3, 2010 

s1124 

Order 

 

December 3, 2010 

141316 

KEVIN DUNN, SR., 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 141316 

 COA: 291254 

 Wayne CC: 07-732258-NI 

OFFICER B. MATATALL and SGT. 

LAWRENCE PORTER, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 18, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

 HATHAWAY, J., would grant leave to appeal.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INTERIM
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND BALANCE SHEETS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q COMMUNICATIONS & POWER
INDUSTRIES HOLDING CORPORATION FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001000654
<NAME> COMMUNICATIONS & POWER INDUSTRIES HOLDING CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           4,090
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,117
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     60,332
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               111,562
<PP&E>                                          72,646
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 224,937
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           87,975
<BONDS>                                        115,374
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           26,181
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            49
<OTHER-SE>                                    (22,494)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   224,937
<SALES>                                        115,330
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               115,330
<CGS>                                           89,878
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   89,878
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,109
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,227
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,875)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       401
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,276)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,276)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 15

- 00030

- CV
Selvino Padilla, Jr. and Jeffrey M. Stern

v. Alex Azoca
On Appeal from the 430th District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Cause No. C

- 2332

- 13

- J

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant. We further order this decision certified below for observ ance.

April 30, 2015
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 23

               Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Forms S-8 No. 333-12107 and No. 333-15237) pertaining to the Company's Amended
and Restated Omnibus Stock Plan and the Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan
for Directors of our report dated August 25, 1999, with respect to the financial
statements and schedule of ACE*COMM Corporation included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 1999.

Ernst & Young LLP

Washington, D.C.
September 22, 1999
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rodney Thompson, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kooper, J.), rendered September 20, 1983, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends on appeal that the People failed to disprove the defense of justification beyond a reasonable doubt *(see,*Penal Law § 25.00 [1]; *People v Reed,*40 NY2d 204, 209). We disagree. Viewed in a light most favorable to the People *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620, 621), the evidence adduced at trial established that the decedent, Ulysses Ivory, had engaged the defendant and his codefendant David Reed in a physical altercation immediately prior to the subject incident in which Ivory had slashed Reed with a knife on the side of his head. Ivory then fled the scene of the encounter. The defendant pursued Ivory for some distance up the block. Ivory attempted to board a bus but was denied entry because he was still carrying the knife. The defendant subsequently tackled Ivory and wrested the knife from him, whereupon Reed, who had rejoined the melee, and the defendant commenced a violent attack upon Ivory, which resulted in his death. The evidence was therefore sufficient to support a finding that the defendant did not reasonably believe that Ivory had either used or threatened the use of deadly physical force following the initial confrontation, and that, in any event, the defendant could have avoided the use of such force by retreating with *512complete safety instead of actively pursuing the decedent and initiating the fatal attack. The defendant, accordingly, was not justified in employing deadly physical force against Ivory during the subsequent encounter *(see,*Penal Law § 35.15 [2]).

We conclude, moreover, that certain testimony as to a violent encounter between the parties which occurred several months prior to the subject incident was probative of motive and intent to seriously injure the decedent and was hence properly admitted into evidence.

The remainder of the defendant’s contentions on appeal are unpreserved for our review and, in any event, are without merit. Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Brown and Spatt, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2266 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2266

   To extend the low-interest refinancing provisions under the Local 
Development Business Loan Program of the Small Business Administration, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 2015

Ms. Judy Chu of California (for herself, Ms. Hahn, Ms. Meng, Mr. Payne, 
   Ms. Clarke of New York, Ms. Adams, Mr. Takai, Mrs. Lawrence, Mr. 
  Moulton, Mr. Bera, and Ms. Tsongas) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the low-interest refinancing provisions under the Local 
Development Business Loan Program of the Small Business Administration, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Commercial Real Estate and Economic 
Development Act of 2015'' or the ``CREED Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. RESTORATION OF LOW-INTEREST REFINANCING UNDER THE LOCAL 
              DEVELOPMENT BUSINESS LOAN PROGRAM.

    (a) Repeal and Restoration.--Subsection (b) of section 1122 of the 
Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 (15 U.S.C. 696 note) is repealed, and 
the provision of law struck by such subsection, and any regulations 
promulgated pursuant to such sections, as were in effect on September 
26, 2012, are restored and revived.
    (b) Effective Date.--Effective 5 years after the date of enactment 
of this Act, section 502(7) of the Small Business Investment Act of 
1958 (15 U.S.C. 696(7)) is amended by striking subparagraph (C).

SEC. 3. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.

    The amendments made by section 2 may not be construed as an 
authorization of appropriations for the purpose of carrying out such 
amendments or the loan program established under section 502 of the 
Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C. 696).
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Q.E.P. Co., Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending
February 29, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Randall N. Paulfus, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition, and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                               
|-------------------------------
|/s/ Randall N. Paulfus         
|Randall N. Paulfus             
|Interim Chief Financial Officer

June 13, 2006