alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS, STATEMENTS
OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY AND STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND 
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL 
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                          11,964
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  241,249
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,109
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 295,799
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           150
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,412
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   295,799
<SALES>                                         38,135
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                74,271
<CGS>                                           33,635
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,602
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,084
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,409
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,459)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,459)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,459)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.16)
        

</TABLE>
Listen

# Request for Congressional Appropriation for Fiscal Year 2022

May 28, 2021

Report

-  All Reports 
-  Annual Statutory Enforcement 
-  Briefing Reports 
-  Advisory Committees Reports 
-  Budget and Performance 
-  FOIA Reports 
-  Data Inventory Program 
-  Civil Rights Complaints 
-  Historical Publications 
-  Archives
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of
the Company for the periods presented.
  /s/ Robert J. MichelRobert J. MichelChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
<PAGE>

                                                               EXHIBIT 21.1

            SUBSIDIARIES OF UNIVISION COMMUNICATIONS INC.







PTI Holdings, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
Univision Television Group, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
KWEX License Partnership, G.P., a California general partnership
KUVN License Partnership, G.P., a California general partnership
KLUZ License Partnership, G.P., a California general partnership
KMEX License Partnership, G.P., a California general partnership
KDTV License Partnership, G.P., a California general partnership
KFTV License Partnership, G.P., a California general partnership
KTVW License Partnership, G.P., a California general partnership
KXLN License Partnership, G.P., a California general partnership
WGBO License Partnership, G.P., a California general partnership
WXTV License Partnership, G.P., a California general partnership
WLTV License Partnership, G.P., a California general partnership
KUVS License Partnership, G.P., a California general partnership
KUVI License Partnership, G.P., a California general partnership
The Univision Network Limited Partnership
Galavision, Inc.
Sunshine Acquisition, L.P.
Sunshine Acquisition Corp.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 15, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 51370]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19844]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs

[212A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900253G]


Indian Gaming; Approval of Tribal-State Class III Gaming Compact 
in the State of Washington

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice publishes the approval of the Sixth Amendment to 
the Tribal-State Compact (Amendment) for Class III Gaming between the 
Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Tribe) and the State of Washington (State).

DATES: The Amendment takes effect on September 15, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of 
Indian Gaming, Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary--Policy and 
Economic Development, Washington, DC 20240, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#adddccd8c1cc83c5ccdfd9edcfc4cc83cac2db"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3e4e5f4b525f10565f4c4a7e5c575f10595148">[email protected]</span></a>, (202) 
219-4066.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under section 11 of the Indian Gaming 
Regulatory Act (IGRA), Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq., the 
Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the Federal Register notice 
of approved Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class 
III gaming activities on Indian lands. As required by 25 CFR 293.4, all 
compacts and amendments are subject to review and approval by the 
Secretary. The Amendment authorizes the Tribe to engage in sports 
wagering at the Tribe's class III gaming facility, updates the Compact 
to reflect this change in various sections, and incorporates Appendix 
S, Sports Wagering. The Amendment is approved.

Bryan Newland,
Assistant Secretary, Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2021-19844 Filed 9-14-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337-15-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACTAPPEALS Appeal of

-- Hempt Bros., Inc. Under Purchase Order No. AMMO RD ) ) ) ) ) ASBCA No. 59923

APPEARANCE FORTHE APPELLANT: Michael L. Bangs, Esq.

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: Bangs Law Office, LLC Camp Hill, PA Raymond M. Saunders, Esq.

Army ChiefTrial Attorney MAJ Lawrence P. Gilbert, JA

Trial Attorney OPINION BYADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE MCILMAIL On 6 April 2015, appellant, Hempt Bros., Inc. (Hempt), filed this appeal from a contracting officer's 4 February 2015 final decision. On 11May2015,the Board ordered that the parties address whetherthe Boardpossessedjurisdictionto entertain the appeal. In response, the government argued that no contract existed with appellant and, at best, appellant may be a subcontractor for providing services. Thus, no privity exists between Hempt and the government. Also, in response on 10 June 2015, Hempt, through counsel, stated: Hempt had no intention ofpresenting a formal "claim" underthis administrative process to the contracting officer and its letter ofJanuary 12, 2015 [seeking payment of$13,213.81] was never intended to be as such

....

Hempt does not believe thatthe matters at issue

...should be subjectto the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals. Hempt believes that [the government] erroneously invoked this appeal process and it should not continue. Hemptbelieves that the proper decision in this matter is that the Armed Services Board ofContractAppeals lacksjurisdictionto hear this matter in that it is not an appeal ofthe contracting officer's decision at all. On 27 August 2015, the Board ordered that by 4 September 2015, the parties show cause why, in view ofHempt's 10 June 2015 statements, the appeal should not be considered withdrawn, and why, therefore, the appeal should not be dismissed without prejudice. On 1 September 2015, the government responded that the appeal should be withdrawn, and that it did not oppose dismissal with or without prejudice. Appellant has not responded to the order to show cause. In view ofHempt's 10 June 2015 statements, we find that the appeal has been withdrawn. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed from the Board's docket, without prejudice. Dated: 3 November 2015

I concur**/~~** /./ /

# ~~~~~&--- Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals Administ ative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I concur 

### /·)

## -~---

# RICJ~~CKLEFORD Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59923, Appeal ofHempt Bros., Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

2 .GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 11113 Summary Calendar

JAMES K. CHAMBERS , Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

A

- AVALON CORRECTIONS SERVICES, INCORPORATED; SOUTHERN CORRECTIONS, INCORPORA TED; L. SERRANO, Administrator,

Defendant s
- Appellee s

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:15

- CV

- 387

Before KING, DENNIS, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
James K. Chambers has filed an interlocutory appeal in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action challenging the district court’s partial grant of summary judgment in favor of Avalon Corrections Services, Incorporat ed (“Avalon”) and Southern Corrections, Incorporated (“Southern”). See F ED

. R. C IV

. P. 54(b). He also challenges the district court’s denial of a restraining order against Avalon,

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 9, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-11113 Document: 00513629519 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/09/2016No. 15

- 11113

2 Southern, and their employee , L. Serrano. Finally, he seeks an injunction pending appeal. In his appellate brief, Chambers does not address the district court’s dismissal of his claims against Avalon and Southern. He does not address the district court’s conclusion that Chambers failed to identi f y an unconstitutional policy or custom; instead , he rehashes his claim that Serrano violated his constitutional rights by denying him medical treatment. He likewise does not address the district court’s denial of his request for a temporary restraining
order. When an appellant fails to identify any error in the district court’s analysis, it is the same as if the appellant had not appealed that issue.
Brinkmann v . Dallas C ty

. Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Although pro se briefs are afforded liberal constructi on, arguments must be briefed in order to be preserved. Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224

- 25 (5th Cir. 1993). Because Chambers fails to raise any argument regarding
the district court’s dismissal of his claims against Avalon and Southern and
the denial of a temporary restraining order , these claims are abandoned

. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED , and the motion for injunctive relief pending appeal is DENIED

. Case: 15-11113 Document: 00513629519 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/09/2016
# C_2021504EN.01003101.xml

| 14.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 504/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 504/31

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10489 – BAXTER / HILL-ROM)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 504/05)

On 6 December 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10489. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10489. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
# CI2021512EN.01000101.xml

| 20.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 512/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 512/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10536 – TOTALENERGIES / THREE GORGES CORPORATION / JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 512 I/01)

On 14 December 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10536. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10536. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
# C_2021303EN.01000401.xml

| 29.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10268 — SYNNEX/Tech Data)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 303/03)

On 23 July 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10268. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10268. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 11542]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad pursuant to an agreement with their foreign owner or custodian for temporary display in the exhibition “Medieval Bologna: Art for a University City” at the Frist Art Museum, Nashville, Tennessee, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Chi D. Tran, Program Administrator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000.                

Matthew R. Lussenhop,

Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2021-20391 Filed 9-20-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
Skip to main content

Privacy Policy•Site map

# Contact Us

United States Court of Federal Claims

Howard T. Markey National Courts Building

717 Madison Place, NW

Washington, DC 20439

Lisa Reyes, Clerk of Court

### Administrative Services

### Case and Technology Services

Revised 11/10/2014

Howard T. Markey National Courts Building • 717 Madison Place, NW, Washington, DC 20439 • 202-357-6400
# C_2021205EN.01000401.xml

| 31.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/4

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2021/C 205/04)

1.

As provided for in Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may submit a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury. Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit G-1), CHAR 4/39, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| High tenacity yarn of polyesters | The People’s Republic of China | Anti-dumping duty | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/325 of 24 February 2017 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of high tenacity yarns of polyesters originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council
  (OJ L 49, 25. 2.2017, p. 6) | 26. 2.2022 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

High tenacity yarn of polyesters

The People’s Republic of China

Anti-dumping duty

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/325 of 24 February 2017 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of high tenacity yarns of polyesters originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council

(OJ L 49, 25. 2.2017, p. 6)

26. 2.2022

---

(1)  OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.

1

(2)  TRADE-Defence-Complaints@ec.europa.eu

2

(3)  The measure expires at midnight (00:00) of the day mentioned in this column.

3

---