alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED May 9, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-20644 Summary Calendar

THE COCA COLA CO.; NIKE, INC.; TOYOTA MOTOR SALES USA, INC.; WARNER BROS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.; VIACOM INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,

versus NATIONAL BUSINESS FORMS AND PRINTING; ET AL., Defendants,

versus R. PERRY MCCONNELL, Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:04-CV-3213

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * R. Perry McConnell, former counsel for National Business Forms and Printing (NBFP), appeals the district court’s order requiring him to pay $11,000 in sanctions following the settlement of this civil litigation.No. 05-20644 -2- Although the plaintiffs moved for sanctions under F ED . R.
C IV . P. 11(b), it is not clear from the record whether the district court imposed sanctions solely on that basis. Further, although the district court determined that McConnell’s conduct amounted to a misuse of litigation, the basis for that determination is not clear from the record. We are therefore unable to conduct a meaningful review of the district court’s
order. See Copeland v. Wasserstein, Perella & Co., Inc. , 278 F.3d 472, 484-86 (5th Cir. 2002). We vacate the district court’s order imposing sanctions and remand for an explanation of whatever ruling the district court might make on the sanctions issue on remand. We leave to the sound discretion of the district court the determination of what further proceedings, if any, may be necessary.
VACATED AND REMANDED.
# C_2021504EN.01004701.xml

| 14.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 504/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 504/47

---

Commission notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates applicable as from 1 January 2022

(Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 (1))

(2021/C 504/20)

Base rates calculated in accordance with the Communication from the Commission on the revision of the method for setting the reference and discount rates (OJ C 14, 19.1.2008, p. 6.). Depending on the use of the reference rate, the appropriate margins have still to be added as defined in this communication. For the discount rate this means that a margin of 100 basispoints has to be added. The Commission Regulation (EC) No 271/2008 of 30 January 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 foresees that, unless otherwise provided for in a specific decision, the recovery rate will also be calculated by adding 100 basispoints to the base rate.

Modified rates are indicated in bold.

Previous table published in OJ C 472, 23.11.2021, p. 7.

| From | To | AT | BE | BG | CY | CZ | DE | DK | EE | EL | ES | FI | FR | HR | HU | IE | IT | LT | LU | LV | MT | NL | PL | PT | RO | SE | SI | SK | UK |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.1.2022 | ... | -0,49 | -0,49 | 0,00 | -0,49 | 2,49 | -0,49 | -0,01 | -0,49 | -0,49 | -0,49 | -0,49 | -0,49 | 0,26 | 2,38 | -0,49 | -0,49 | -0,49 | -0,49 | -0,49 | -0,49 | -0,49 | 1,21 | -0,49 | 2,27 | -0,03 | -0,49 | -0,49 | 0,51 |

From

To

AT

BE

BG

CY

CZ

DE

DK

EE

EL

ES

FI

FR

HR

HU

IE

IT

LT

LU

LV

MT

NL

PL

PT

RO

SE

SI

SK

UK

1.1.2022

...

-0,49

-0,49

0,00

-0,49

2,49

-0,49

-0,01

-0,49

-0,49

-0,49

-0,49

-0,49

0,26

2,38

-0,49

-0,49

-0,49

-0,49

-0,49

-0,49

-0,49

1,21

-0,49

2,27

-0,03

-0,49

-0,49

0,51

---

(1)  OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1.

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 5, 2018 d0226

Order 

Clerk

March 5, 2018

155475

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 155475

COA: 328331

Wayne CC: 14-008795-FH

ELLIOT RIVERS, a/k/a MELVIN JONES,

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 26, 2017 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                         CERTIFICATION OF THE PRESIDENT
                         AND THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of GeneThera, Inc. (the "Company"), I,
Antonio Milici, M.D., Ph.D., President and Chief Executive Officer (the
"Registrant"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Registrant.

      Date: March 31, 2005


      By: /s/ Antonio Milici
      ----------------------
      Antonio Milici, M.D., Ph.D., President
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 22 Engrossed in House (EH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 22

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt employees with 
health coverage under TRICARE or the Veterans Administration from being 
 taken into account for purposes of determining the employers to which 
     the employer mandate applies under the Patient Protection and 
                          Affordable Care Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Hire More Heroes Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. EMPLOYEES WITH HEALTH COVERAGE UNDER TRICARE OR THE VETERANS 
              ADMINISTRATION NOT TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IN DETERMINING 
              EMPLOYERS TO WHICH THE EMPLOYER MANDATE APPLIES UNDER 
              PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT.

    (a) In General.--Section 4980H(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(F) Exemption for health coverage under tricare 
                or the veterans administration.--Solely for purposes of 
                determining whether an employer is an applicable large 
                employer under this paragraph for any month, an 
                individual shall not be taken into account as an 
                employee for such month if such individual has medical 
                coverage for such month under--
                            ``(i) chapter 55 of title 10, United States 
                        Code, including coverage under the TRICARE 
                        program, or
                            ``(ii) under a health care program under 
                        chapter 17 or 18 of title 38, United States 
                        Code, as determined by the Secretary of 
                        Veterans Affairs, in coordination with the 
                        Secretary of Health and Human Services and the 
                        Secretary.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to months beginning after December 31, 2013.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 6, 2015.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                H. R. 22

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt employees with 
health coverage under TRICARE or the Veterans Administration from being 
 taken into account for purposes of determining the employers to which 
     the employer mandate applies under the Patient Protection and 
                          Affordable Care Act.
```
U.S. Department of the Interior

U.S. Geological Survey

GCMRC Budget Update

Scott VanderKooiSouthwest Biological Science CenterGrand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center
FY15

$9,548,100 total budget

1

2

34*

5

7 6

8

9

10

11

12*

15

14

13

Geophysical sciAquatic and fish Vegetation (6%SocioeconomicAdministration 

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐*projects directcultural resourc

All categories include USGS burden

rate on GCMRC activities (15.6%)
FY16

$9,859,600 total budget

$9,806,

All categories include USGS burden rate (21.3%)

All categories includ

Geophysical sciences (35%)

Aquatic and fish science (41%)

Vegetation (6%)Socioeconomics (2%)Administration and support (16%)

Projects directly related to culturalresources (6%)

Aq

Admin

Projects directly r

Aquatand fiscienc

Geophysicalsciences

Aquaticand fishsciences
FY 16 and FY 17

Anticipated GCDAMP funding

FY16 – $9.1 million

FY17 – $9.3 million

USGS/SBSC/GCMRC indirect cost rates:

FY16 – 21.3%FY17 – 27.4%

Proposed GCRMC budget:

FY16 – $9.9 million

FY17 – $9.8 million
FY 16 and FY 17

Anticipated GCDAMP funding

FY16 – $9.1 million

FY17 – $9.3 million

USGS/SBSC/GCMRC indirect cost rates:

FY16 – 21.3%FY17 – 27.4%

Proposed GCRMC budget:

FY16 – $9.9 million

FY17 – $9.8 million

Prioritize monitoring and research activities

Shorten research projects from 3 years to 2 years

Delay start times of some projects

Remove some projects from GCDAMP funding

Reduce GCDAMP funding and implement cost s

FY16 – GCDAMP funding at 93% of identif

FY17 – GCDAMP funding at 95% of identif
Burden Rates Revised f

FY15 & FY16

USGS/SBSC/GCMRC indirect cost rates:

FY15 – 15.6%FY16 – 21.3%FY17 – 27.4%

→ 13.6%→ ~13%→ 27.4%?

Estimated additional funding availabledue to reduced indirect cost rates:

FY15 – ~$150,000FY16 – ~$500,000FY17 – no change

Revised funding estimates:

FY15 – GCDAMP funding at 100% of i

Propose to carry forward surp

FY16 – GCDAMP funding at ~98% of i

FY17 – GCDAMP funding at 95% of id
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1. | The                Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section                13(a) or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in                all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Company. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |    /s/                Daniel R. Baty |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|   | Daniel                R. Baty                       |
|   | Co-Chief                Executive Officer           |
|   | November                9, 2007                     |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2346 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2346

 To extend the authorization of appropriations for allocation to carry 
 out approved wetlands conservation projects under the North American 
          Wetlands Conservation Act through fiscal year 2020.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 14, 2015

Mr. Wittman (for himself and Mr. Thompson of California) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the authorization of appropriations for allocation to carry 
 out approved wetlands conservation projects under the North American 
          Wetlands Conservation Act through fiscal year 2020.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``North American Wetlands Conservation 
Extension Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 7(c) of the North American Wetlands Conservation Act (16 
U.S.C. 4406(c)) is amended by striking ``not to exceed--'' and all that 
follows through paragraph (5) and inserting ``not to exceed $50,000,000 
for each of fiscal years 2015 through 2020.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
      32.2








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the quarterly report of eLinear, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-QSB/A (Second Amendment) for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      JoAnn Agee, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
      JoAnn Agee


JoAnn
      Agee,


Principal
      Accounting Officer


August
      12, 2005








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      eLinear, Inc. and will be retained by eLinear, Inc. and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          31,482
<SECURITIES>                                 1,182,420
<RECEIVABLES>                                  390,997
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,631,506
<PP&E>                                         122,804
<DEPRECIATION>                                  73,259
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,833,148
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          890,843
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     739,780
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,833,148
<SALES>                                      1,863,130
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,922,540
<CGS>                                        1,425,531
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,801,905
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                182,888
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (13,626)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            196,514
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (190,820)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,694
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
OVERRULEDBYJM-398

Honorable CharlesA. Allen Opinion No. C-739 Criminal DistrictAttorney Harrison County Courthouse Re: Reimbursement by Harrison Marshall, Texas County to county jail inmates whose money and valuables were taken by esDear Mr. Allen: tapingprisoners. In an opinion request of this office you pose the following question:

"On the 27th day of May, 1966 three (3) prisoners sawed theirway out of confinement in the jail of Harrison County, Texas; pulled a knife on the jailer and took in excess of $400.00 cash and other valuables belonging toprisoners who were then confined in the County Jail. Can Harrison County legally reimburse the people whosemoney and valuables were taken by the escapees?" We answer your question in the negative. Th,eexpenditure of public fundsby a county commissioner'scourtmay be made only if it is authorizedby the Constitution or statutes of the State of Texas. De Mary v. Jefferson County, 179 S.W. 2d 584 (Tex.Civ. App. lm error ref.); Canales if.Laughlin, 214 S.W. 2d, 451 (Tex. iup. 1948); Harrison County v. City of Marshall, 253 S.W. 2d 67 (Tex. Civ. App. 1952, error ref.) We find no authorization for a county to reimburseprisoners of the County Jail for cash and/or other valuablesbelonging to saidprisonerswhich was taken from the County Jail by escapingprisoners. SUMMARY -me---- Harrison Countymay not legally reimburse inmates of the County Jail formoney and/or other valuables belonging to them, taken from the custody of the Sheriff by escapingprisoners.

-3568-Honorable CharlesA. Allen, page 2 (C-739)

Yours very truly, WAGGONER CARR Attorney General of Texas

SK/lb APPROVED OPINION COMMITTEE W. V. Geppert, Chairman Malcolm Quick Wade Anderson Lonny Zwiener Douglas Chilton APPROVED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: T. B. WRIGHT

-3569-
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
 
 
 Docket No.Blythe Mesa Solar II, LLC
EG21-164-000Corazon Energy, LLC
EG21-165-000Trent River Solar Mile Lessee, LLC
EG21-166-000Golden Hills Wind Farm LLC
EG21-167-000CED Crane Solar, LLC
EG21-168-000BRP Sweeny BESS LLC
EG21-169-000Lincoln Land Wind, LLC
EG21-170-000ES 1A Group 2 Opco, LLC
EG21-171-000Edwards Sanborn Storage I, LLC
EG21-172-000ES 1A Group 3 Opco, LLC
EG21-173-000Edwards Solar Line I, LLC
EG21-174-000Prairie Wolf Solar, LLC
EG21-175-000Daylight I, LLC
EG21-176-000Sanborn Solar Line I, LLC
EG21-177-000Edwards Sanborn Storage II, LLC
EG21-178-000Clover Creek Solar, LLC
EG21-179-000Antelope Expansion 1B, LLC
EG21-180-000Ensign Wind Energy, LLC
EG21-181-000Independence Wind Energy LLC
EG21-182-000Glass Sands Wind Energy, LLC
EG21-183-000Board River Solar, LLC
EG21-184-000CPRE 1 Lessee, LLC
EG21-185-000Speedway Solar NC, LLC
EG21-186-000Stony Knoll Solar, LLC
EG21-187-000Lancaster Solar LLC
EG21-188-000SR Georgia Portfolio II Lessee, LLC
EG21-189-000SR Lumpkin, LLC
EG21-190-000SR Snipesville II, LLC
EG21-191-000Jayhawk Wind, LLC
EG21-192-000Minonk Stewardship Wind LLC
EG21-193-000
 Take notice that during the month of August 2021, the status of the above-captioned entities as Exempt Wholesale Generators became effective by operation of the Commission's regulations. 18 CFR 366.7(a) (2020). Dated: September 15, 2021. Debbie-Anne A. Reese, Deputy Secretary.


[FR Doc. 2021-20383 Filed 9-20-21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                            EXHIBIT 23.1

                        Consent of Independent Auditors

The Board of Directors
Trigon Healthcare, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in registration statements
(Nos. 333-22463, 333-26187, 333-26189 and 333-26191) on Form S-8 of Trigon
Healthcare, Inc. of our report dated February 11, 2000, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Trigon Healthcare, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, changes in shareholders' equity and comprehensive income and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1999,
which report is incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K. We also consent to
the incorporation by reference in the aforementioned registration statements of
our report dated February 11, 2000, relating to the financial statement schedule
of Trigon Healthcare, Inc., which report appears in this Form 10-K.


/s/KPMG LLP

Richmond, Virginia
March 29, 2000