alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	Pacific Northwest (D13)
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4619" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/DOD2/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="aprint factsheet">
    <div class="header">

        <img height="100" class="print-logo" alt="Site Logo" src="/Portals/0/Images/Official USCG Emblem.png?ver=0BEUcC5lxfanFqthfDyaOg%3d%3d" />

        <h1 class="title">Pacific Northwest (D13)</h1>
        <h3 class="date">
            Updated: June 27, 2018
        </h3>
    </div>
    
<div id="adetail-slick-gallery" class="gallery">
    
    <div class="item">
        
        <div class="image">
            
            <img src="https://media.defense.gov/2018/Jun/27/2001936334/1920/1080/0/180627-G-OY189-713.PNG"
                 class="aimage img-responsive"
                 alt="District 13: Idaho, Montana, Oregon, Washington,"
                 itemprop="image" />
        </div>
        
        
        
        
        
        <div class="slide-info-hidden">
            <div class="slide-info-inner">
            
            <div class="image-title">District 13</div>
            <div class="image-caption">District 13: Idaho, Montana, Oregon, Washington,</div>
        </div>
    </div>
    </div>

    
</div>
<div class="slide-info"></div>





    Thirteenth District Command Center Number: <span>(206) 220-7001 - For maritime emergency use only </span><br />
</div>

    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2204 

To clarify the authority of States and political subdivisions thereof to regulate 

liquefied petroleum gas rail transload facilities that are owned or operated 

by or on behalf of a rail carrier. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 1, 2015 

Mr. MCGOVERN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To clarify the authority of States and political subdivisions 

thereof to regulate liquefied petroleum gas rail transload 

facilities that are owned or operated by or on behalf 

of a rail carrier. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safe Communities Act 

5 of 2015’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2204 IH

1 SEC. 2. JURISDICTION OF THE SURFACE TRANSPORTATION 

2 BOARD. 

3 Section 10501(c) of title 49, United States Code, is 

4 amended— 

5 (1) in paragraph (1)— 

6 (A) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) 

7 and (B) as subparagraphs (B) and (C), respec8 tively; and 

9 (B) by inserting before subparagraph (B), 

10 as so redesignated, the following new subpara11 graph: 

12 ‘‘(A) the term ‘liquefied petroleum gas rail 

13 transload facility’ means the portion of a facility 

14 owned or operated by or on behalf of a rail carrier 

15 where liquefied petroleum gas, as a commodity to be 

16 transported for a charge, is collected, stored, sepa17 rated, processed, treated, managed, disposed of, or 

18 transferred, but such term does not include activities 

19 taking place at such portion that are comprised sole20 ly of the railroad transportation of liquefied petro21 leum gas after the liquefied petroleum gas is loaded 

22 for shipment on or in a rail car, including railroad 

23 transportation for the purpose of interchanging rail24 road cars containing liquefied petroleum gas;’’; and 

25 (2) in paragraph (2)— 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2204 IH

1 (A) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of subpara2 graph (A); 

3 (B) by striking the period at the end of 

4 subparagraph (B) and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

5 (C) by adding at the end the following new 

6 subparagraph: 

7 ‘‘(C) a liquefied petroleum gas rail transload fa8 cility.’’. 

9 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

10 The amendments made by section 2 shall be effective 

11 as of July 1, 2013. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2021492EN.01000401.xml

| 8.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 492/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 492/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10496 – CREMER / CLYDE INVESTMENTS / CREMER SUSTAINABLE FOODS JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 492/02)

On 26 November 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10496. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10496. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 23

                              Accountants' Consent

Board of Directors
CBES Bancorp, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (No.
333-39785) on Form S-8 of CBES Bancorp, Inc. of our report, dated August 10,
2001, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of CBES Bancorp, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of June 30, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income, and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2001,
which report appears in the June 30, 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of CBES
Bancorp, Inc.

                                                  /s/ KPMG LLP

Kansas City, Missouri
September 25, 2001
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 12.1
 
          COMPUTATION OF PRO FORMA RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
 
                         (IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT RATIOS)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                         DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31,
                                           1996(2)        1996         1995
                                         ------------ ------------ ------------
<S>                                      <C>          <C>          <C>
Pro forma pretax income (1).............    $100.0      $(545.5)      $101.8
  Estimated interest portion of rents...       8.7          8.7          8.8
  Pro forma interest charges (1)........      86.1         86.1         90.0
                                            ------      -------       ------
  Pro forma fixed charges...............      94.8         94.8         98.8
                                            ------      -------       ------
Pro forma income as adjusted............     194.8       (450.7)       200.6
Pro forma ratio of earnings to fixed
 charges................................    $  2.1      $  (4.8)      $  2.0
                                            ======      =======       ======
</TABLE>
--------
(1) Historical ratio of earnings to fixed charges is not considered meaningful
    as no interest costs were allocated from Baxter to Allegiance for the
    historical periods presented prior to September 30, 1996. The unaudited
    pro forma combined statements of income are presented in Note 3 to "Notes
    to Consolidated Financial Statements."
(2) Excludes a charge of $550.0 million for the write-down of goodwill and
    other non-recurring costs of a pretax amount of $95.5 million primarily
    for facility consolidations and other asset write-downs.
<PAGE>   1
 
   
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
    
 
   
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
    
 
   
     We consent to the use of our report dated March 24, 1998, included in the
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Environmental Safeguards, Inc. for the year
ended December 31, 1997, with respect to the consolidated financial statements,
as amended, included in this Form 10-KSB/Amendment No. 1.
    
 
   
                                                 /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
    
 
   
Houston, Texas
    
   
June 17, 1998
EXHIBIT 23

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-55180, 333-63268, 333-68718, 333-81290,
333-104402, 333-108529) of Paid, Inc. of our report dated March 16, 2005, on our
audit of the consolidated financial statements of Paid, Inc., which report
appears in the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-KSB of Paid, Inc.


/s/ Carlin, Charron & Rosen, LLP

Marlborough, Massachusetts

March 31, 2005
GMAC Mortgage Corporation
100 Witmer Road
P.0. Box 963
Horsham, PA 19044-0963

                                                                      (LOGO)GMAC
                                                                        MORTGAGE


March 31, 1997



Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.
Andy Rosenfeld
Securities Administration Services
11000 Broken Land Parkway
Columbia, Md 21044-3562
Control3O87



                         ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE






This is to certify that a review of the activities of GMAC Mortgage  Corporation
for the calendar year 1996 has been made and to the best of my  knowledge,  GMAC
Mortgage  Corporation has fulfilled all its  obligations  under the terms of the
Servicing Agreement.


/S/Joanne Moore-Baird
Joanne Moore-Baird
Assistant Vice President
Contract Administration
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       2,445,374
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,773,597
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (18,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            28,546,688
<PP&E>                                      11,676,157
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,290,467
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              42,351,320
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,440,245
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       149,264
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,836,161
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                42,351,320
<SALES>                                     20,635,148
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,635,148
<CGS>                                       11,334,681
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,410,508
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             608,850
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                695,506
<INCOME-TAX>                                    39,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            656,006
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   656,006
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04


</TABLE>
# C_2021509EN.01000601.xml

| 17.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 509/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 509/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10523 – NORDIC CAPITAL / ROTHSCHILD / TA ASSOCIATES / RLDATIX)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 509/06)

On 8 December 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10523. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10523. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-06-00804-CV

Jessica Gutierrez, Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF MCCULLOCH COUNTY, 198TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 2005095, HONORABLE EMIL KARL PROHL, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from an order terminating the parental rights of Jessica Gutierrez

to her minor child, J.E.G. Ms. Gutierrez’s court-appointed attorney filed an Anders brief containing

a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating that there are no arguable grounds to be

advanced on appeal. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Counsel concludes that

the appeal is without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders. See Taylor v. Texas Dep’t

of Family & Protective Servs., 160 S.W.3d 641, 646-47 (Tex. App.—Austin 2005, pet. denied)

(applying Anders procedure in appeal from termination of parental rights).

A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to Ms. Gutierrez, who was advised of her

right to examine the record and to file a pro se brief. Ms. Gutierrez submitted a letter acknowledging

that she has a medical condition but denying that she has neglected her child. After reviewing the

record, we have found nothing that would arguably support an appeal, and we agree that the appeal
2

is frivolous and without merit. We affirm the judgment of the trial court and further grant counsel’s

motion to withdraw as attorney.

__________________________________________

Jan P. Patterson, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Pemberton

Affirmed

Filed: August 28, 2007
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 24, 2013 

# Order

Clerk October 24, 2013

147119 ( 17 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 147119

v COA: 314842

Saginaw CC: 10

- 034800

- FH

ARMANTAYE DAISUAN BULLOCK,

Defendant

- Appellant

.

______________________________ /

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff

- appellee to extend the time

for f iling its answer to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The answer

submitted on October 18, 2013, is accepted for filing.
#### PEOPLE v. KELLY et al.

(Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.

April 2, 1894.)

James Kelly and John Von Glahn move to vacate judgment entered on a forfeited recognizance. See 22 N. Y. Supp. 775.

A. J. Hochstadter, for defendant.

*1138DALY, C. J.

The communication from the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children shows that there is some inaccuracy in the statement as to the prosecution of James Kelly, and the alleged withdrawal of the charge by the society. As the original papers are said to be mislaid, proof of the facts alleged may be taken before the court at special term, and presented to the next general term. The certificates of the court of special sessions must be produced.
# CI2021076EN.01002401.xml

| 5.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 76/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 76/24

---

COVID – 19 outbreak

(Regulation (EU) 2021/267 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2021 laying down specific and temporary measures in view of the persistence of the COVID-19 crisis concerning the renewal or extension of certain certificates, licences and authorisations, the postponement of certain periodic checks and periodic training in certain areas of transport legislation and the extension of certain periods referred to in Regulation (EU) 2020/698 (1)
  )

(2021/C 76 I/14)

Hungary

Date of the Information to the Commission: 1.3.2021

Hungary has decided, in conformity with the relevant provisions of Regulation (EU) 2021/267 of the European Parliament and of the Council that it shall not apply the following provisions:

| — | Article 5(1) concerning the time limits for the periodic roadworthiness tests for motor vehicles and their trailers under Directive 2014/45/EU (2); |
| --- | --- |

—

Article 5(1) concerning the time limits for the periodic roadworthiness tests for motor vehicles and their trailers under Directive 2014/45/EU (2);

| — | Article 5(2) concerning the validity of roadworthiness certificates under Directive 2014/45/EU; |
| --- | --- |

—

Article 5(2) concerning the validity of roadworthiness certificates under Directive 2014/45/EU;

| — | Article 12(1) concerning the time limits for the performance of a regular review under Directive 2012/34/EU (3); |
| --- | --- |

—

Article 12(1) concerning the time limits for the performance of a regular review under Directive 2012/34/EU (3);

| — | Article 12(2) concerning the validity of temporary licences under Directive 2012/34/EU. |
| --- | --- |

—

Article 12(2) concerning the validity of temporary licences under Directive 2012/34/EU.

---

(1)  OJ L 60, 22.2.2021, p. 1.

(2)  Directive 2014/45/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 on periodic roadworthiness tests for motor vehicles and their trailers and repealing Directive 2009/40/EC (OJ L 127, 29.4.2014, p. 51).

(3)  Directive 2012/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 establishing a single European railway area (OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 32).

---
UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

(Updated November 14, 2022)

Guidance for In-Person Courtroom 

Proceedings

Until further notice, the following rules apply to all in-person proceedings and

shall be communicated to all attending:

• A list of parties attending a proceeding may be required if the presiding judge 

determines it is necessary. In those cases, the list of participants should be 

submitted to the Clerk of Court. 

• The counsel of record for each party shall confirm with chambers ahead of the 

proceeding that any colleagues, staff, and clients who plan to attend the 

proceeding are asymptomatic for COVID-19.

• Any individual who develops symptoms or tests positive for COVID-19 within 

14 days of visiting the court must notify the court immediately.

• Bottled water may be brought into the courtroom but must be removed and 

disposed of properly in the trash bins in the courtroom lobby at the conclusion of 

the proceeding. Water will not be provided by the court.

• Please limit the path of travel to courtroom, elevators, and bathroom facilities.

• Wash hands and use the hand sanitizers.

• Paper sharing of documentation between judge and parties should be limited. 

Electronic mode of sharing is encouraged.
ofix-ex101_7.htm



Exhibit 10.1

 

AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO

ORTHOFIX MEDICAL INC.

AMENDED AND RESTATED

2012 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

WHEREAS, Orthofix Medical Inc. (the “Company”) has established and maintains the Amended and Restated 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”); and

WHEREAS, the Company’s Board of Directors desires to amend the Plan, subject to the approval of the Company’s shareholders, solely to increase the number of shares of common stock of the Company reserved and available for issuance pursuant to the Plan by 1,200,000 shares.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that by virtue and in exercise of the power reserved to the Company’s Board of Directors by Section 5.3 of the Plan, the Plan be and hereby is amended, subject to approval by the Company’s shareholders (this “Amendment”), in the following particulars, to be effective as of the date the Company’s shareholders approve this Amendment:


	
 
	
1. 
	
By substituting the phrase “Seven Million Fifty Thousand (7,050,000) shares” for the phrase “Five Million Eight Hundred Fifty Thousand (5,850,000) shares” in Section 4.1(a) of the Plan.
	
 




* * * * *

(Approved by the Company’s shareholders on June 21, 2021)