alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

LASHAN JACKSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-3874

[February 11, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; John J. Murphy, III, Judge; L.T. Case No. 15-

002425CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Breanna Atwood, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jessenia J. 

Concepcion, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6061

In Re: GARY L. DETEMPLE,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

(CV-99-145, CV-00-84, CV-00-63, CV-00-64, CV-00-149, CV-00-116)

Submitted: May 18, 2001 Decided: June 1, 2001

Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gary L. DeTemple, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Gary DeTemple has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus

requesting that this court recuse the district court judge acting

in his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000) motion and several

bankruptcy actions, grant him release pending resolution of his

§ 2255 motion, and reverse the district court’s orders dismissing

specified civil actions. He also moves for stay and to compel the

Bureau of Prisons to comply with the law.

The writ of mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used only in

extraordinary circumstances. In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th

Cir. 1987) (citing Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394,

402 (1976)). It is available only when there are no other means by

which the relief sought could be granted. Id. The party seeking

mandamus relief thus carries the heavy burden of showing that he

has no other adequate means to attain the relief he desires and

that his entitlement to such relief is clear and indisputable.

Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc., 449 U.S. 33, 35 (1980).

Addressing DeTemple’s requests for recusal, while mandamus is

a proper avenue to seek judicial recusal, Beard, 811 F.2d at 826-

27, we find no facts warranting recusal. As to DeTemple’s request

that this court reverse several of the district court’s orders mandamus is not a proper substitute for appeal. In re Catawba Indian

Tribe, 973 F.2d 1133, 1135 (4th Cir. 1992). Turning to DeTemple’s

request that he be granted release on bond pending the resolution
3

of his § 2255 motion, we deny the request because other avenues of

relief remain available him. Accordingly, we deny DeTemple’s petition for mandamus and all pending motions. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-2265

JOSEPH M. RUSSELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL P. MCWEENY; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; VICTOR ELION, P.H.D.,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (4:08-cv-00063-JBF-JEB)

Submitted: January 15, 2009 Decided: January 21, 2009

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph M. Russell, Appellant Pro Se. Christy Monolo, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; William Norman Watkins, SANDS, ANDERSON, MARKS & MILLER, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Joseph R. Russell appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil complaint pursuant to District of Columbia
Court of Appeals v. Feldman , 460 U.S. 462 (1983), and Rooker v.
Fidelity Trust Co. , 263 U.S. 413 (1923). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Russell v. McWeeny , No. 4:08-cv-00063-JBF-JEB (E.D. Va. Oct. 2, 2008). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2021314EN.01000201.xml

| 6.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 314/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 314/2

---

Notice for the attention of the persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2010/638/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/1305, and in Council Regulation (EU) No 1284/2009 as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1302 concerning restrictive measures against the Republic of Guinea

(2021/C 314/02)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2010/638/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/1305 (2), and in Annex II to Council Regulation (EU) No 1284/2009 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1302 (4).

The Council of the European Union has amended the identifying information of the persons that appear in the above-mentioned Annexes.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the web-sites in Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 1284/2009, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 8 of the Regulation).

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1.C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1.C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

---

(1)  OJ L 280 26.10.2010, p. 10.

(2)  OJ L 283, 6.8.2021, p. 18.

(3)  OJ L 346, 23.12.2009, p.26

(4)  OJ L 283, 6.8.2021, p. 9.

---
riii_ex42.htm

EXHIBIT 4.2
  
  
  
  
 	 
	1
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	2
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	3
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	4
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	5
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	6
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	7
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	8
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	9
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	10
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Thomas Flynn, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Edelstein, J.), rendered June 11, 1984.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed *(see, People v Pellegrino, 60*NY2d 636; *People v Harris,*61 NY2d 9). Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Weinstein and Spatt, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**LQ CORPORATION, INC.**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of LQ Corporation, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James A. Mitarotonda, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that: 

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and 

 

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated: March 29 2004
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of ILEX Oncology, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey
H. Buchalter, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                    /s/ Jeffrey H. Buchalter
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Name:  Jeffrey H. Buchalter
                                    Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
                                    Date:  May 13, 2003

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 178 (Friday, September 17, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 51885]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-20119]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9058-4]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information 202-564-5632 or https://www.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)
Filed September 3, 2021 10 a.m. EST Through September 13, 2021 10 a.m. 
EST
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-public/action/eis/search.

EIS No. 20210137, Fourth Final Supplemental, FHWA, VT, Champlain 
Parkway/Southern Connector Burlington Vermont, Review Period Ends: 10/
18/2021, Contact: Patrick Kirby 802-828-4568.
EIS No. 20210138, Draft, USCG, PRO, Offshore Patrol Cutter Acquisition 
Program, Comment Period Ends: 11/01/2021, Contact: Andrew Haley 202-
372-1821.
EIS No. 20210139, Final, USMC, USAF, AZ, Extension of the Barry M. 
Goldwater Range Land Withdrawal and Proposed Gila Bend Addition Land 
Withdrawal, Review Period Ends: 10/18/2021, Contact: Jon Haliscak 210-
395-0615.
EIS No. 20210140, Draft, BLM, UT, Pine Valley Water Supply Project, 
Comment Period Ends: 11/01/2021, Contact: Brooklynn Cox 435-865-3073.

    Dated: September 13, 2021.
Candi Schaedle,
Acting Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal 
Activities.
[FR Doc. 2021-20119 Filed 9-16-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
|   | 1. | The      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));      and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |    /s/  Daniel      R. Baty |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Daniel      R. Baty                                  |
|   | Co-Chief      Executive Officer                      |
|   | August      8, 2008                                  |
----

----

Form10-K

Exhibit 32

| (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                         |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                 |
| (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|   |                                                                                                                                                 |
|   |                                                                                                                                                 |

| Date: March 16, 2010                  |   |                          |
|---------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
|                                  |   |                          |
|                                  |   |                          |
|                                  |   |                          |
|                                  |   |                          |
| /s/ Thomas X. Geisel                  |   | /s/ Robert B. Crowl           |
| Thomas X. Geisel                      |   | Robert B. Crowl               |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   | Executive Vice President and  |
| (Principal Executive Officer)         |   | Chief Financial Officer       |
|                                  |   | (Principal Financial Officer) |

----

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0364

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

LAURRIE ANNE WHEELER - JEAKINS,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including January 15, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 8 2023

12/08/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0364
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**








**CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**





I,
      Phillip Michael Hardy, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
      Report of eLinear, Inc. on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarterly period ended
      September 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
      in
      such Form 10-QSB/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial
      condition and results of operations of eLinear, Inc.





Date:
      June 2, 2006











By:
      __/s/  Phillip Michael Hardy___________


Phillip
      Michael Hardy


Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Summary Financial Data Schedule contains summary financial information
extraced from Balance Sheet, Statement of Operations, Statements of Cash Flows
and Notes thereto incorporated in Part II, Item 6 of this Form 10-Q and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       7,165,878
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               30,940,868
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,496,000
<INVENTORY>                                 26,321,681
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            64,656,284
<PP&E>                                      10,382,927
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,840,205
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              84,509,141
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       32,769,729
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           851
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,184,895
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                84,509,141
<SALES>                                    187,714,736
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                      142,421,814
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               39,531,934
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,069,472
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,180,746
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,170,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,010,746
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,010,746
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .24


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2291 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2291

To amend title 38, United States Code, to make permanent the authority 
 of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to transport individuals to and 
  from facilities of the Department of Veterans Affairs in connection 
with rehabilitation, counseling, examination, treatment, and care, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 13, 2015

 Mr. Larsen of Washington (for himself and Mr. Thornberry) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to make permanent the authority 
 of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to transport individuals to and 
  from facilities of the Department of Veterans Affairs in connection 
with rehabilitation, counseling, examination, treatment, and care, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rural Veterans Travel Enhancement 
Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. MAKING PERMANENT AUTHORITY FOR SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS TO 
              TRANSPORT INDIVIDUALS TO AND FROM FACILITIES OF 
              DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    Section 111A(a) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking paragraph (2); and
            (2) in paragraph (1), by striking ``(1)''.

SEC. 3. TREATMENT OF VET CENTERS AS DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 
              FACILITIES FOR PURPOSES OF PAYMENTS OR ALLOWANCES FOR 
              BENEFICIARY TRAVEL.

    (a) In General.--Section 111 of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(h)(1) Vet Centers shall be treated as Department facilities for 
purposes of providing payment of actual expenses of travel or allowance 
for travel to or from a Department facility under this section.
    ``(2) In this subsection, the term `Vet Center' means a center for 
readjustment counseling and related mental health services for veterans 
under section 1712A of this title.''.
    (b) Applicability.--Section 111(h) of such title, as added by 
subsection (a), shall apply with respect to travel occurring on or 
after the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 4. REAUTHORIZATION OF GRANTS FOR VETERANS SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS 
              FOR TRANSPORTATION OF HIGHLY RURAL VETERANS.

    Section 307(d) of the Caregivers and Veterans Omnibus Health 
Services Act of 2010 (Public Law 111-163; 38 U.S.C. 1710 note) is 
amended by striking ``through 2014'' and inserting ``through 2020''.
                                 <all>
```
EX-10.15





 Exhibit 10.15 

CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT, MARKED BY [****], HAS BEEN OMITTED BECAUSE IT IS BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) THE REGISTRANT
TREATS AS PRIVATE OR CONFIDENTIAL. 
  

					
	S13-348:MW	  	AMENDMENT	  	10/7/2016

 AMENDMENT NO 2 

TO THE 
 LICENSE
AGREEMENT EFFECTIVE THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH 2016 
 BETWEEN 

STANFORD UNIVERSITY 

AND 
 SURROZEN 

Effective the 7th day of October 2016, THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY (“Stanford”), an institution of higher
education having powers under the laws of the State of California, and Surrozen (“Surrozen”), a corporation having a principal place of business at 240 E. Grand Ave., 2nd Floor, South San Francisco, CA 94080 agree as follows: 

 

	1.	 BACKGROUND 



Stanford and Surrozen are parties to a license agreement effective the 23rd day of March 2016 (“Original Agreement”) covering “Surrogate WNT
Proteins” disclosed in Stanford docket [****]. 
 Stanford and Surrozen wish to further amend the Original Agreement to add a new provisional patent
application to the license. 
  

	2.	 AMENDMENT 



Paragraph 2.6 of Original Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 

2.6    “Licensed Patent” means U.S. Patent Applications, [****], any foreign patent application corresponding thereto, and any
divisional, continuation, or reexamination application, extension, and each patent that issues or reissues from any of these patent applications. Any claim of an unexpired Licensed Patent is presumed to be valid unless it has been held to be invalid
by a final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction from which no appeal can be or is taken. “Licensed Patent” excludes any continuation-in-part (CIP)
patent application or patent. Neither party shall file or authorize another party to file a CIP of any Licensed Patent without the written approval of the other Party. 

  
  

PAGE 1 OF 2 















					
	S13-348:MW	  	AMENDMENT	  	10/7/2016

  


	3.	 OTHER TERMS 


  

	3.1	 Within [****] following execution of this Amendment, Surrozen will pay Stanford [****] to cover past patent
costs for the added patent application. All other terms of the Original Agreement remain in full force and effect. 


  

	3.2	 The parties to this document agree that a copy of the original signature (including an electronic copy) may be
used for any and all purposes for which the original signature may have been used. The parties further waive any right to challenge the admissibility or authenticity of this document in a court of law based solely on the absence of an original
signature. 


 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No 2 in duplicate originals by their duly authorized
officers or representatives. 
  

			
	THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
		
	Signature:	 	 /s/ Katharine Ku

	Name:	 	      

	Title:	 	 Executor Director

Technology Licensing

		
	Date:	 	 Oct 25, 2016

	
	SURROZEN
		
	Signature:	 	 /s/ Tim Kutzkey

	Name:	 	Tim Kutzkey
	Title:	 	CEO
		
	Date:	 	10/24/16


  
  

PAGE 2 OF 2