alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Listen

# Civil Rights and Equity of Legal Financial Obligations in North Carolina

August 28, 2023

The North Carolina Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights adopted a proposal to undertake a study of civil rights and equity of legal financial obligations (LFOs) in North Carolina. The focus of the Committee’s proposed inquiry was to review LFOs to examine (a) state practices governing LFOs, including the fees levied under the remit of LFOs; (b) collection practices by the state; (c) whether LFOs have a disparate impact on minority and indigent groups; and (d) the impact of LFOs on the basis of race, color, and income. The focus for this project is post-conviction LFOs as there is significant, separate work to be conducted around bail reform.

Report

Policy Brief

Press Release

North Carolina

-  All Reports 
-  Annual Statutory Enforcement 
-  Briefing Reports 
-  Advisory Committees Reports 
-  Budget and Performance 
-  FOIA Reports 
-  Data Inventory Program 
-  Civil Rights Complaints 
-  Historical Publications 
-  Archives
#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Storage                    
csv

      Inflow                    
csv

      Total Release                    
csv

      Pool Elevation                    
csv

      Evaporation                    
csv

      Delta Storage                    
csv

      Area                    
csv

      Release Volume                    
csv

      Inflow Volume                    
csv

      Bypass Release                    
csv

      Bypass Release Volume                    
csv

#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Storage                    
json

      Inflow                    
json

      Total Release                    
json

      Pool Elevation                    
json

      Evaporation                    
json

      Delta Storage                    
json

      Area                    
json

      Release Volume                    
json

      Inflow Volume                    
json

      Bypass Release                    
json

      Bypass Release Volume                    
json
EXHIBIT
32.1





PERICOM
SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED





PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with this quarterly report of Pericom Semiconductor Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the three months ended December 27, 2008 (the
“Report”), I, Alex C. Hui, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
knowledge:


(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and


(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
and for the periods indicated.





September
25, 2009




By:
              /s/ Alex C. HuiAlex
      C. HuiChief
      Executive OfficerPericom
      Semiconductor Corporation
EXHIBIT 32.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Steakhouse Partners, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, A. Stone Douglass President, Secretary and Director of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, a amended; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                   /s/  A. Stone Douglass
                   A. Stone Douglass
                   President, Secretary and Director
                   (Serving as principal executive officer)
                   April __, 2004
EXHIBIT
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION**


**OF**


**CHIEF
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Manhattan
      Pharmaceuticals, Inc. do hereby certify that:




(a) the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Manhattan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. for the
      quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and




(b) information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of Manhattan Pharmaceuticals,
      Inc.







Dated:
      May 15, 2006


/s/
      Douglas Abel


Douglas
      Abel


President
      and Chief Executive Officer




Dated:
      May 15, 2006


/s/
      Nicholas J. Rossettos


Nicholas
      J. Rossettos


Chief
      Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer
# C_2021248EN.01000101.xml

| 25.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 248/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 248/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10269 — TDR Capital/Arrow Global)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 248/01)

On 17 June 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10269. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10269. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
# C_2021082EN.01001201.xml

| 11.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/12

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9938 — Kingspan Group/Trimo)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 82/11)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Kingspan Holding Netherlands B.V. (Netherlands), controlled by Kingspan Group plc, |
| --- | --- |

—

Kingspan Holding Netherlands B.V. (Netherlands), controlled by Kingspan Group plc,

| — | Trimo, arhitekturne rešitve, d.o.o. (Slovenia), controlled by European Architectural Systems S.à r.l. |
| --- | --- |

—

Trimo, arhitekturne rešitve, d.o.o. (Slovenia), controlled by European Architectural Systems S.à r.l.

Kingspan Holding Netherlands B.V. acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Trimo, arhitekturne rešitve, d.o.o.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | for Kingspan Holding Netherlands B.V.: manufacture of sandwich panels, insulation, light & air solutions, water and energy, and data and flooring technology, |
| --- | --- |

—

for Kingspan Holding Netherlands B.V.: manufacture of sandwich panels, insulation, light & air solutions, water and energy, and data and flooring technology,

| — | for Trimo, arhitekturne rešitve, d.o.o.: mainly manufacture of mineral fibre sandwich panels. |
| --- | --- |

—

for Trimo, arhitekturne rešitve, d.o.o.: mainly manufacture of mineral fibre sandwich panels.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9938 — Kingspan Group/Trimo

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [ER-FRL-9058-4] 

*Responsible Agency:*                     Office of Federal Activities, General Information 202-564-5632 or                     *https://www.epa.gov/​nepa.*

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) 

Filed September 3, 2021 10 a.m. EST Through September 13, 2021 10 a.m. EST 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

## Notice

                    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment letters on EISs are available at:                     *https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/​cdx-enepa-public/​action/​eis/​search.*

*EIS No. 20210137, Fourth Final Supplemental, FHWA, VT,*                     Champlain Parkway/Southern Connector Burlington Vermont,  Review Period Ends: 10/18/2021, Contact: Patrick Kirby 802-828-4568.                

*EIS No. 20210138, Draft, USCG, PRO,*                     Offshore Patrol Cutter Acquisition Program,  Comment Period Ends: 11/01/2021, Contact: Andrew Haley 202-372-1821.                

*EIS No. 20210139, Final, USMC, USAF, AZ,*                     Extension of the Barry M. Goldwater Range Land Withdrawal and Proposed Gila Bend Addition Land Withdrawal,  Review Period Ends: 10/18/2021, Contact: Jon Haliscak 210-395-0615.                

*EIS No. 20210140, Draft, BLM, UT,*                     Pine Valley Water Supply Project,  Comment Period Ends: 11/01/2021, Contact: Brooklynn Cox 435-865-3073.                

Dated: September 13, 2021. 

Candi Schaedle, 

Acting Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities. 

[FR Doc. 2021-20119 Filed 9-16-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northwest Pipe Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephanie J. Welty, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                                              
|----------------------------------------------
|                                              
|/s/ Stephanie J. Welty                        
|Stephanie J. Welty                            
|Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
|                                              
|May 8, 2009
# C_2021269EN.01000201.xml

| 7.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10327 — Elexent/GP JOULE Connect/Elexent DACH JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 269/02)

On 1 July 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10327. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10327. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
(November 20, 1986)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent v Herman D. Neu, Appellant.

— Harvey, J.

In September 1982, defendant allegedly shot and killed a clerk at the Afton Country Store in the Town of Afton, Chenango County, during the course of a robbery. As a result, he was indicted for numerous crimes by a Grand Jury. Following a jury trial, he was found guilty of two counts of murder in the second degree, two counts of robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree and robbery in the third degree. This appeal ensued.

Defendant contends that he was denied a fair trial because he was shackled in the presence of the jury throughout his trial. A defendant may not be shackled in the presence of the jury unless a justifiable basis is articulated on the record *(People v Gonzalez,*115 AD2d 899, 901; *see, Holbrook v Flynn,*475 US 560, —, 106 S Ct 1340, 1346-1347; *People v Mendola,*2 *886NY2d 270, 275; *People v Williams,*36 AD2d 1018; *Propriety and Prejudicial Effect of Gagging, Shackling, or Otherwise Physically Restraining Accused During Course of State Criminal Trial,*Ann., 90 ALR3d 17). Assuming justifiable grounds exist for shackling, it is incumbent upon the trial court to instruct the jury that the shackling should be disregarded and not bear on their determination as to defendant’s guilt or innocence *(People v Mixon,*120 AD2d 861; *People v Hart,*112 AD2d 471). The fact that a defendant fails to request such a charge is of no significance *(People v Mixon, supra).*Further, the failure to give such an instruction cannot be overlooked even in the face of overwhelming evidence of guilt *(People v Hart, supra,*p 472).

Here, it is undisputed that defendant was kept in shackles throughout his trial despite his request that they be removed before the jury was brought in. No explanation for keeping the leg irons on defendant was offered in the record. The trial court failed to provide a charge to the jury regarding defendant’s shackles. The People’s attempt to draw a distinction between the prejudicial effect of handcuffs as compared to leg irons is without merit *(see generally, Propriety and Prejudicial Effect of Gagging, Shackling, or Otherwise Physically Restraining Accused During Course of State Criminal Trial,*Ann., 90 ALR3d 17, §§ 18-20). The further argument that a charge regarding defendant’s shackles was not necessary since it was not requested is contrary to the law *(see, e.g., People v Mixon, supra).*Accordingly, we are constrained to conclude that defendant was denied a fair trial.

Since there must be a new trial, we deem it appropriate to note that we find defendant’s other assertions on appeal to be without merit, with the exception of the fact that the trial court should have determined defendant’s motion to suppress the testimony of Investigator Gerald Croiser and make the necessary findings of fact with regard to that motion *(see,*CPL 710.60 [5], [6]).

Judgment reversed, on the law, and matter remitted to the County Court of Chenango County for a new trial. Kane, J. P., Main, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.
STEINAKER RESERVOIRLatitude: 40.515Longitude: -109.533Elevation: 5513

STEINAKER RESERVOIR

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Split Mountain Site Page...



Split Mountain

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Kings Cabin Site Page...



Kings Cabin

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Trout Creek Site Page...



Trout Creek
#### PEOPLE, Respondents, v. VOSBURGH, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

October 2, 1896.)

Proceeding against Margaret Vosburgh.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur.
# C_2021012EN.01000101.xml

| 12.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 12/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 12/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10041 — PAI/Addo/ComplEat)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 12/01)

On 6 January 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10041. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10041. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Ave Air Temp                    
csv

      Min Air Temp                    
csv

      Max Air Temp                    
csv

      Ave Dewpoint                    
csv

      Peak Wind Gust                    
csv

      Evapotranspiration, Kimberly-Penman                    
csv

      Evapotranspiration, Asce-Ewri Grass                    
csv

      Evapotranspiration, Asce-Ewri Alfalfa                    
csv

      Precipitation                    
csv

      Wy Precip                    
csv

      Avg Net Radiation                    
csv

      Ave Relative Humidity                    
csv

      Growing Degree Days                    
csv

      Ave Wind Speed                    
csv

      Ave Wind Direction                    
csv

      Wind Run                    
csv

      Minimum Soil Temperature, 4 In Depth                    
csv

      Minimum Soil Temperature, 8 In Depth                    
csv

      Maximum Soil Temperature, 4 In Depth                    
csv

      Maximum Soil Temperature, 8 In Depth                    
csv

      Average Soil Temperature, 8 In Depth                    
csv

      Maximum Shielded Canopy Temperature                    
csv

      Minimum Shielded Canopy Temperature                    
csv

      Average Soil Temperature, 4 In Depth                    
csv

      Precip Accum                    
csv

#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Ave Air Temp                    
json

      Min Air Temp                    
json

      Max Air Temp                    
json

      Ave Dewpoint                    
json

      Peak Wind Gust                    
json

      Evapotranspiration, Kimberly-Penman                    
json

      Evapotranspiration, Asce-Ewri Grass                    
json

      Evapotranspiration, Asce-Ewri Alfalfa                    
json

      Precipitation                    
json

      Wy Precip                    
json

      Avg Net Radiation                    
json

      Ave Relative Humidity                    
json

      Growing Degree Days                    
json

      Ave Wind Speed                    
json

      Ave Wind Direction                    
json

      Wind Run                    
json

      Minimum Soil Temperature, 4 In Depth                    
json

      Minimum Soil Temperature, 8 In Depth                    
json

      Maximum Soil Temperature, 4 In Depth                    
json

      Maximum Soil Temperature, 8 In Depth                    
json

      Average Soil Temperature, 8 In Depth                    
json

      Maximum Shielded Canopy Temperature                    
json

      Minimum Shielded Canopy Temperature                    
json

      Average Soil Temperature, 4 In Depth                    
json

      Precip Accum                    
json