alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AP RIL 29, 2020

NO. 03

- 19

- 00348

- CV

Appellant, Glenn Hegar, Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts // Cross

- Appellants, Arnulfo P. Alcorta; Jose Abram Alcorta; Reyes Alcorta; Armando Al varado, Jr.; David A. Arizmendi; Te resa Arizmendi

- Gordon; Adela A. Bautista; Guadalupe Cantu, Jr.; Jose Angel Gomez Cantu; Jul ian Jesus Torres Cantu; Olga Cantu; Olivia T. Cantu; Hortencia Cantu Castillo; Carmelo Cordero; Guadalupe Torres Corona; Margarita Diaz; Maria Torres Galvan; Frances A. Garcia; Guadalupe S. Gonzales; Julia C. Gonzalez; Maria Christina Gonzales; Pedro T. Gu ajardo; Juanita T. Hernandez; Margarita T. Hernandez; Brandon R. Hugonnett; Christopher Hugonnett; Jose Luis Hugonnett; Manuel Hug onnett; Maria Guadalupe Hugonnett; Ricardo Guillermo Hugonnett; Shawn Hugonnett; Cleofas Torres Juarez; Dora Alicia Medina; Au rora Diana Cantu Mejia; Rosalinda Cantu Pena; Edwardo Ramos, Jr.; Eloyd D. Ramos; Linda A. Rios; Carmen Rodriguez; Maria Del Rosar io Rodriguez; Carlos Salazar; Velma Thies; Beatris Torres; Cosme Torres, Jr.; James Torres; Jose Angel Torres; Jose Luis Torre s; Marcelina Torres; Raul Torres; Alfredo R. Torrez; Miguel Torrez; Isabel C. Vasquez; Mary T. Venable, and Irma Salazar Villanuev a

v.

Appellees, Arnulfo P. Alcort a, Jose Abram Alcorta; Reyes Alcorta; Armando Alvarado, Jr.; David A. Arizmendi; Teresa Ar izmendi

- Gordon; Adela A. Bautista; Guadalupe Cantu, Jr.; Jose Angel Gomez Cantu; Julian Jesus Torres Cantu; Olga Cantu; Olivia T. C antu; Hortencia Cantu Castillo; Car melo Cordero; Guadalupe Torres Corona; Margarita Diaz; Maria Torres Galvan; Frances A. Gar cia; Guadalupe S. Gonzales; Julia C. Gonzalez; Maria Christina Gonzales;

Pedro T. Guajardo; Juanita T. Hernandez; Margarita T. Hern andez; Brandon R. Hugonnett; Christ opher Hugonnett; Jose Luis Hugonnett; Manuel Hugonnett; Maria Guadalupe Hugonnett; Ricardo Guillermo Hugonnett; Shawn Hugonnett; Cleofas Torres Juarez; Dora Alicia Medina; Aurora Diana Cantu Mejia; Rosalinda Cantu Pena; E dwardo Ramos, Jr.; Eloyd D. Ramos; Linda A. Rios; Carmen Rodriguez; Maria Del Rosario Rodriguez; Carlos Salazar; Velma Thies; Beatris Torres; Cosme Torres, Jr.; James Torres; Jose Angel Torres; Jose Luis Torres; Marcelina Torres; Raul Torres; Alfredo R. To rrez; Miguel Torrez; Isabel C. Vasq uez; Mary T. Venable, and Irma Salazar Villanueva, // Cross

- Appellee, Glenn Hegar,

Texas C omptroller of Public AccountsAPPEAL FROM 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND SMITH

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE SMITH

This is an appeal from the interlocutory order signed by the tr i a l cour t on May 17, 2019

. Having

reviewed the record and the par ties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error

in the trial court’s interlocutory order

. Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s interlocutory

order

. The appellant

/cros s

- appellee sha ll pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Cour t

and in the court below.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MICHAEL BRADY OWENS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 239 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 16th day of October, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Douglas R. CAGLE, Specialist Four, U.S. Army, Appellant.

No. 30,191.

U. S. Court of Military Appeals.

Jan. 9, 1976.

*254
      *Lieutenant Colonel James Kucera, Captain Gordon R. Denison,*and *Captain Frederick G. Boynton*were on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel Donald W. Hansen, Captain William G. Kirk,*and *Captain Raymond Michael Ripple*were on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

For the reasons set out in our opinion in *United States v. Blakey,*1 M.J. 247 (1976), we affirm the decision of the Court of Military Review.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
the consolidated financial statements of First Commonwealth, Inc. as of 
September 30, 1998, and for the nine months then ended, and is qualified in 
its entirety by reference to such financial statements. 
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          5,767
<SECURITIES>                                      527         
<RECEIVABLES>                                   4,337
<ALLOWANCES>                                      378
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               14,718 
<PP&E>                                          4,590
<DEPRECIATION>                                  2,842
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 37,441
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          10,759
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            4
<OTHER-SE>                                     26,241
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   37,441
<SALES>                                             0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               47,721
<CGS>                                               0         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  42,766 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  108
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 4,847
<INCOME-TAX>                                    1,963
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             2,884
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                    2,884
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.77
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             395
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,582
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     35,324
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                64,301
<PP&E>                                         183,849
<DEPRECIATION>                                  34,486
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,190,479
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          593,783
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,910,391
<OTHER-SE>                                  (3,408,791)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,190,479
<SALES>                                        276,419
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               276,419
<CGS>                                           29,636
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   29,636
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,406,300
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              64,393
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (3,226,598)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (3,228,198)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (3,228,198)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.89)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.89)
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of John P. Kilminster, an Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, Petitioner.

Respondent, an attorney who was admitted to practice by this court on April 5, 1978 under the name John Patrick Kilminster has submitted an affidavit dated September 14, 1987 in which he tenders his resignation as an attorney and counselor-at-law *(see,*22 NYCRR 691.9).

Respondent acknowledges that he is the subject of an investigation by the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District and that the following charges of professional misconduct are pending against him; (1) converting escrow funds in the amount of $6,600 to his own use; (2) converting escrow funds in the amount of $15,000 to his own use; (3) failing to cooperate with the petitioner in its investigation of the complaint which forms the basis of the second charge; (4) converting escrow funds in the amount of $400 to his own use; (5) failing to cooperate with the petitioner Grievance Committee in its investigation of the complaint which forms the basis of *725the fourth charge; (6) converting escrow funds in the amount of $18,300 to his own use; (7) failing to cooperate with the petitioner Grievance Committee in its investigation of the complaint which forms the basis of the sixth charge; (8) neglecting a legal matter entrusted to him and misappropriating $1,500 of the client’s funds; (9) failing to cooperate with the petitioner Grievance Committee in its investigation of the complaint which forms the basis of the eighth charge; (10) neglecting a legal matter entrusted to him; (11) failing to cooperate with the petitioner Grievance Committee in its investigation of the complaint which forms the basis of the tenth charge; (12) failing to register as an attorney as required by section 468-a of the Judiciary Law and 22 NYCRR 118.1; and (13) failing to cooperate with the petitioner Grievance Committee in its investigation of the complaint which forms the basis of the twelfth charge.

Respondent states that his resignation is freely and voluntarily rendered; that he is not being subjected to coercion or duress; and that he is fully aware of the implications of submitting his resignation. Respondent further acknowledges that if charges were predicated on the misconduct outlined above he could not successfully defend himself on the merits against such charges.

Under the circumstances herein, the respondent’s resignation as a member of the Bar is accepted and directed to be filed; and it is ordered that respondent be disbarred and his name struck from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, effective forthwith. Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Thompson, Bracken and Rubin, JJ., concur.
#### John E. COLVELL, Jr., Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF the AIR FORCE, Respondent.

No. 2007-3245.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

June 29, 2007.

John E. Colvell, Jr., pro se.

ORDER

The petitioner having failed to pay the docketing fee required by Federal Circuit Rule 52(a)(1) and to file the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SERVICE EXPERTS, INC. FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          11,192
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,795
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,550
<INVENTORY>                                     11,570
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                63,014
<PP&E>                                          33,466
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,986
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 194,810
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,069
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           154
<OTHER-SE>                                     142,248
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   194,810
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               238,692
<CGS>                                          154,598
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  214,817
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 688
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 24,455
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,189
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,266
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,266
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.06
        

</TABLE>
1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD,

Complainant,

vs.

DAVID MICHAEL KAMENAR,

Respondent.

Docket Number 2023-0403

Enforcement Activity No. 7774472

CONSENT ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

On November 13, 2023, the parties in this case submitted a Motion for Approval of a 

Settlement Agreement and Entry of Consent Order to be approved as a settlement of the case 

under 33 C.F.R. § 20.502. After carefully reviewing the terms of the Settlement Agreement, I

find that it is fair, reasonable, and in substantial compliance with the requirements of 33 C.F.R. 

§ 20.502.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the record, it is hereby ORDERED the Settlement Agreement is 

APPROVED in full and incorporated herein by reference. This Consent Order shall constitute 

full, final, and complete adjudication of this proceeding.

Done and dated this 8th day of January 2024, at 

Houston, Texas

______________________________

HON. TOMMY CANTRELL

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE 

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### APPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT

K. DEAN KANTARAS, ESQ., BCS and K. DEAN KANTARAS, P.A., Appellants, v. JASON ALAN DATTISMAN,

Appellee. No. 2D23-510 January 12, 2024 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Joshua Riba, Judge. K. Dean Kantaras of K. Dean Kantaras, P.A., Palm Harbor, for Appellants. Jason A. Dattisman, pro se. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. KELLY, MORRIS, and LABRIT, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Exhibit 10.10


 


 


AMENDMENT TO LETTER OF INTENT


 


This Amendment (this
“Amendment”) to that certain Letter of Intent (the “LOI”) is made as of the
14th day of June, 2021, by and between AUREUS, INC., NELSON’S CREAMERY, LLC and NEWTECH SERVICES LLC.


 


W I T N E S S E T H


 


WHEREAS, the parties entered
into the LOI with an Effective Date of March 29, 2021; and


 


WHEREAS, the parties hereto
desire to amend the terms of the LOI as provided in this Amendment;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration
of the foregoing and of the mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt
and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound, the parties hereby agree as follows:


 


1.                 
Capitalized Terms. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the LOI.


 


2.                 
Amendment to Paragraph 10. Paragraph 10 of the LOI is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


Termination. This
Letter shall terminate (unless extended by mutual written agreement of the Parties) upon the earliest to occur of (i) written notice of
such termination by Acquiror to the Company at its sole discretion specific to unsatisfactory Due Diligence, (ii) execution of the Definitive
Agreement, or (iii) July 31, 2021; provided, however, that the provisions of paragraphs 2, 4, 10, 11, 13 and 14 shall
survive any termination of this Letter.


 


3.                 
Remaining Provisions. Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, the LOI shall remain in full force and effect.


 


4.                 
Governing Law. This Amendment shall be governed by and construed under and in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas.


 


5.                 
Headings. The headings in this Amendment are for purposes of reference only and shall not limit or otherwise affect the
meaning hereof.


 


6.                 
Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in separate counterparts, including by email in portable document format, none
of which need contain the signatures of all parties, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, and all of which taken together
constitute one and the same instrument.


 


[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]


 


 


 


 






    	 	1	 



     

    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is executed
and effective as of the first date set forth above.


 


	 	 
	AUREUS, INC.	NELSONS CREAMERY, LLC
	 	 
	 	 
	By: /s/ Everett M. Dickson                	By: /s/ Evan Fineman                 
	Name: Everett M. Dickson	Name: Evan Fineman
	Title: President	Title: CFO


 


	 
	NEWTECH SERVICES LLC
	 
	By: /s/ Neal E. White                    
	Name: Neal E.White
	Title: President


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 






    	 	2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Louis Riviezzo, Appellant.

The defendant contends that his plea of guilty should be vacated as he was not advised, at the time of the plea allocution, of his rights to remain silent and to confront witnesses. Having failed either to move to withdraw his plea on this ground prior to the imposition of sentence *(see,*CPL 220.60 [3]) or to vacate the judgment pursuant to CPL 440.10, the defendant has not preserved for appellate review the issue of the sufficiency of the plea allocution *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Claudio,*64 NY2d 858; *People v Pellegrino,*60 NY2d 636; *People v Mattocks,*100 AD2d 944). In any event, were we to review this issue in the interest of justice, vacatur would not be required as the allocution satisfied the requirements of *People v Harris*(61 NY2d 9; *see, People v Velasquez,*107 AD2d 726).

*838The hearing court did not err in allowing the police officer to characterize the area as a drug-prone location. Such testimony was not hearsay as it was based upon the officer’s personal knowledge and experience. Moreover, the testimony was particularly relevant with respect to the issue of whether there was probable cause to justify the defendant’s arrest *(see, People v McRay,*51 NY2d 594; *People v Bittner,*97 AD2d 33), and at a suppression hearing, hearsay testimony is admissible to establish a material fact *(see,*CPL 710.60 [4]). Nor can it be said that the hearing court unduly interposed itself into the proceeding and thereby prejudiced the defendant.

Finally, as the defendant received the sentence for which he had bargained, and which was the minimum allowable, he should not now be heard to complain that it is unduly harsh or excessive *(see, People v Kazepis,*101 AD2d 816). Mollen, P. J., Brown, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.
Listen

# Civil Rights Implications of Disaster Relief: Hurricane María in Puerto Rico

The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights will hold a briefing on Friday, December 10, 2021, on the civil rights implications of the federal response and impact of Hurricane María in Puerto Rico. At this public briefing, the Commissioners will hear from subject matter experts such as government officials, volunteer organizations, non-governmental advocates, and academics from Puerto Rico. The Commission will accept written materials from the public for consideration as we prepare our report; submit to mariabriefing@usccr.gov no later than January 10, 2022.

This briefing is open to the public via livestream on the Commission’s YouTube Page. (Streaming information subject to change.) Public participation is available for the event with view access, along with an audio option for listening. Written testimony and other materials can be found on the Commission’s website here.

Computer assisted real-time transcription (CART) will be provided. The web link to access CART (in English) on Friday, December 10, 2021, is https://www.streamtext.net/player?event=USCCR. Please note that CART is text-only translation that occurs in real time during the meeting and is not an exact transcript.

To request additional accommodations, persons with disabilities should email access@usccr.gov by Monday, December 6, 2021, indicating “accommodations” in the subject line.

Friday, December 10, 2021 - 9:00 AM

Transcript

Final Agenda

Final Agenda (Spanish)

Media Advisory

Media Advisory (Spanish)

Agenda (Sunshine Act Notice)

Agenda (Sunshine Act Notice) (Spanish)

Save the Date

Save the Date (Spanish)

Public Comments

Panelist Materials

Civil Rights and Protections During the Federal Response to Hurricanes Harvey and María

Puerto Rico

December 10, 2021

December 10, 2021

-  Event Calendar 
-  Public Briefings 
-  Commission Business Meetings 
-  Advisory Committees Meetings 
-  Archives
# C_2021318EN.01000101.xml

| 9.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 318/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 318/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10305 — CDPQ/DWS/Ermewa)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 318/01)

On 2 August 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10305. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10305. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---