alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Piccolo 

MUC Laura Rakel Pirruccello - San Antonio, TX 

Flute* 

MU1 Ryan Foley - Excelsior Springs, MO

MU1 Katherine Velasquez - Austin, TX

MUC Laura Rakel Pirruccello 

Oboe* 

MU1 Erik Andrusyak - Sacramento, CA 

MUC Briana Tarby - Edison, NJ 

MU1 Laura Yawney - Clarksville, MD

English Horn

MU1 Laura Yawney 

Clarinet 

MUC Kelly Hurrell (c) - West Palm Beach, FL 

MU1 Mackenzie Austin - Ft. Worth, TX 

MUCS Chantal Hovendick - Blair, NE

MU1 Taylor Isberg - Ellicott City, MD

MUC Noel Marcano - San Juan, PR 

MUC Cedric Mayfield - Houston, TX 

MUC Charlie Suriyakham - Chiang Mai, Thailand 

MU1 Steven Zhang - Vernon Hills, IL

Bass Clarinet 

MU1 Robert Durie - Parkland, FL

Bassoon 

MUCS Brooke Allen (cp) - Jacksonville, NC 

MU1 Sean Maree (cp) - Springfield, VA

MU1 Tyler Wilkins - Erlanger, KY 

Contrabassoon

MU1 Tyler Wilkins 

Alto Saxophone* 

MUC Greg Case - Doylestown, PA 

MUCS Josh Thomas - Plano, TX 

Tenor Saxophone 

MUC Joseph D’Aleo - Farmington, CT 

Baritone Saxophone 

MUC Jeffrey Emerich - Fresno, CA 

Cornet/Trumpet 

MUC Joel Baroody (p) - Herndon, VA

MU1 Christopher Lane - Orlando, FL

MU1 Alison Marseglia - Stonington, CT

MU1 Reneé McGee - Stafford, VA

MUCS Gino Villarreal - Rio Grande City, TX 

MU1 Luke Wingfield - Dallas, TX

French Horn 

MUC Matthew Muehl-Miller (p) - Charleston, IL 

MUC Bryce Nakaoka - Pearl City, HI 

MUCM Brian Nichols - Bradenton, FL

MU1 Justin Ruleman - Lake Jackson, TX

Trombone 

MU1 Karna Millen (p) - Edina, MN 

MU1 Connor Rowe - Lompoc, CA

MUC Sean Nelson - San Antonio, TX 

Bass Trombone 

MUC Wesley Mayhew - Glasgow, KY 

Euphonium 

MU1 Patrick Nyren - South Casco, ME 

vacancy 

Tuba 

MUC Adam Crowe (p) - Guin, AL 

MUCS Stephen Lamb - Plano, TX 

vacancy

String Bass 

MUCS Mark McCormick - St. Louis, MO 

Percussion 

MUC Christopher Smith (p) - Danbury, CT 

MUC Nathan Lassell - Arlington, VA 

MUCS Steven Petersen - Scottville, MI 

MU1 Daniel Raney - Austin, TX

MUC David West - Buffalo, NY 

Harp 

MUC Megan Sesma - Las Vegas, NV 

Soprano Soloist 

MU1 Allison Landstedt - Houston, TX 

Band Master Chief/ 

MU Rating Force Master Chief 

MUCM Brian Nichols 

Audio Engineers 

MU1 Ian Dobie - Boise, ID 

vacancy 

Production 

MUCS Mark McCormick

Media

MUCS Gino Villarreal

Re cruiting 

MUC David West 

Tours 

MUCS Chantal Hovendick 

(p) - principal chair

(cp) - co-principal

(ap) - associate principal

(c) - concertmaster

* - players rotate principal position

MU1—Musician 1st Class

MUC—Chief Musician

MUCS—Senior Chief Musician

MUCM—Master Chief Musician

Visit us on the web at https://www.uscg.mil/band
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 22, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, June 22, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17A1611. ROBERT C. MARIGNA v. AUDRY SWIFT WILBURN, AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF DELIA M. SWIFT.
The appellant in this case failed to comply with the notice of docketing mailed by this Court and with Court of Appeals Rules 22 (a) and 23 (a), regarding the filing of an enumeration of errors and brief within twenty days after the appeal was docketed. See also Court of Appeals Rule 13. On May 16, 2017, this Court ordered the appellant to file an enumeration of errors and a brief no later than May 25, 2017. As of the date of this order, the appellant's enumeration of errors and brief still have not been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is deemed abandoned and is hereby ordered DISMISSED. Court of Appeals Rules 7, 23 (a).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001018754
<NAME> THE LIQUOR CLUB AT PECAN GROVE, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
(9 Misc. Rep. 156.)

#### MORGAN v. GOLDBERG et al.

(Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.

June 4, 1894.)

1. Appeal—Review—Decision op District Court.

Decision of a justice of a district court on conflicting evidence will not. ■ be-disturbed on appeal.

*533. Landlord and Tenant—Renewal of Lease—Waiter of Notice. _

_ The holder, of a lease which provided for its renewal on certain notice to the landlord represented to the landlord that the lease was lost, and requested “something to show” the lease. Thereupon the landlord signed a paper reciting that the premises were leased for a certain term, with the privilege of renewal, but not stating that any notice of the renewal was required. *Held,*that the stipulation in the lease for notice of renewal was not thereby waived.

Appeal from district court.

Summary proceedings by Charles V. Morgan against Etta Goldberg and others. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendants appeal.

Argued before BOOKSTAVER, BISCHOFF, and PRYOR, JJ.

Louis Steckler, for appellants.

H. C. Henderson, for respondent.

PRYOR, J.

In a summary proceeding the tenant asserted a right of possession by virtue of a privilege of renewal. But the privilege of renewal was conditioned on a written notice of at least 30 days before the expiration of the original term, and the trial court negatived the fact of the notice. The testimony on behalf of the tenant is of a character that vindicates the incredulity of the justice. Even upon paper it provokes suspicion, but then, doubtless, the manner of the witnesses was indicative of their untruthfulness. In any event, it is not for us to overrule the decision of the justice on so direct a conflict of evidence. Lynes v. Hickey, 4 Misc. Rep. *522,*24 *N.*Y. Supp. 731. Shortly after the death of the original lessee, upon a representation of his widow that her husband’s copy of the lease was lost, and a request that the landlord would “give something to show they had a lease,” he delivered this paper: “Received from Ettie Epstein the sum of sixty-five dollars on account of rent for house Ho. 248 East Broadway, leased for five years, with the privilege of five, commencing May 1st, 1888. Said premises are rented at the rate of seven hundred and twenty-five dollars,”— subscribed by the landlord. The appellants insist that here was a waiver of the stipulation for notice of renewal in the original lease, but the contention is plainly untenable. On the contrary, the paper was a mere memorandum to certify the fact that the tenant had a lease. It was not intended as a surrender of'the lease and the substitution of a new contract of letting, else assuredly its terms would have been more precise and complete. A lease of valuable property for a period of 10 years was never so drawn. Judgment affirmed, with costs. " All concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001018750  
<NAME> GOLF COURSE INNS OF AMERICA, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,002,497
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,018
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,907,854
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,002,497
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
xi-3 A 

# VIGINAL IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
■ IA -Now ,,teas PR 06-0422 

### OCT 2 5 2022 B"efi Gre

= G rEIE MATTER OF THE PETITION Cl 'K of Suer State f "‘ nrISHLEY DOBBIN CALKINS ORDER

Ashley Dobbin Calkins has petitioned the Court to waive the three-year test requirement for the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination (MPRE) for purposes ofCalkins' application for admission by motion to the State Bar ofMontana. By rule, applicants for admission by motion must provide evidence of the requisite score on an MPRE taken "within three years preceding the date ofthe application for admission." Rule VII.A.9, Rules ofAdmission. Calkins passed the MPRE in 2004 when seeking admission to the practice oflaw in Virginia. The petition states that Calkins has been practicing law for nearly 17years "with no ethical or disciplinary issues." Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition ofAshley Dobbin Calkins to waive the three-year test requirement for the MPRE for purposes ofCalkins' current application for admission by motion to the State Bar ofMontana is GRANTED. The Clerk shall mail a copy ofthis order to Petitioner and to the Administrator of the Board ofBar ExaminerRt_the State Bar ofMontana. DATED this 2--bday ofOctober, 2022.

ChiefJustic 10/25/2022

Case Number: PR 06-0422Justices

2
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2272 

To amend section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, to require that 

the annual budget submissions of the Presidents include the total dollar 

amount requested for intelligence or intelligence related activities of each 

element of the Government engaged in such activities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 12, 2015 

Mrs. LUMMIS (for herself, Mr. WELCH, Mr. GUTIE ́RREZ, Mr. PRICE of North 

Carolina, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, and Mr. JORDAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Budget 

A BILL 

To amend section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, 

to require that the annual budget submissions of the 

Presidents include the total dollar amount requested for 

intelligence or intelligence related activities of each element of the Government engaged in such activities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Intelligence Budget 

5 Transparency Act of 2015’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2272 IH

1 SEC. 2. FUNDING FOR INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES OF EACH 

2 ELEMENT OF THE GOVERNMENT. 

3 Section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, is 

4 amended by redesignating the second paragraph (37) as 

5 paragraph (39) and by adding at the end the following 

6 new paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(40)(A) the total dollar amount proposed in 

8 the budget for intelligence or intelligence related ac9 tivities of each element of the Government engaged 

10 in such activities in the fiscal year for which the 

11 budget is submitted and the estimated appropriation 

12 required for each of the ensuing four fiscal years; 

13 and 

14 ‘‘(B) as used in subparagraph (A), the term 

15 ‘element of the Government’ refers to each element 

16 of the intelligence community as defined in section 

17 3(4) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 

18 U.S.C. 3003(4)).’’. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Access Plans USA, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fourth quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.
 Date: April 2, 2007
    By:
    /s/ ROBERT L. BINTLIFFRobert L. BintliffChief Financial Officer
and Principal Accounting Officer
EXHIBIT 23.4






graphic
Principal Officers:

Keith M. Braaten, P. Eng.

President & CEO

Jodi L. Anhorn, M.Sc., P. Eng.

Executive Vice President & COO



Officers / Vice Presidents:

Caralyn P. Bennett, P. Eng.

Tim R. Freeborn, P. Eng.

Leonard L. Herchen, P. Eng.

Myron J. Hladyshevsky, P. Eng.

Todd J. Ikeda, P. Eng.

Bryan M. Joa, P. Eng.

Mark Jobin, P. Geol.

John E. Keith, P. Eng.





Consent of GLJ Petroleum Consultants Ltd.,


Independent Petroleum Engineering Consultants





Canadian Natural Resources Limited
 2500, 855 Second Street SW
 Calgary, AB  T2P 4J8
 
 Re:
Consent of Independent Petroleum Consultants
 
 To Whom It May Concern:




We consent to the use of our report with respect to the reserves data of Canadian Natural Resources Limited included and incorporated by reference in its





(i)  Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2014; and,





(ii)  Registration Statement on Form F-10 (File No. 333-191876) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.










Yours truly,GLJ PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS LTD.“Originally Signed By”Bryan M. Joa, P. Eng.Vice President


Dated: March 25, 2015


Calgary, Alberta


CANADA




4100, 400  –  3rd Avenue S.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada  T2P 4H2  ·  (403) 266-9500  ·  Fax (403) 262-1855  ·  GLJPC.com
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

T]NITED STATES COAST GUARI)

LNITED STATES COAST GUARD,

Complainant,

vs.

JAMES PATRICKJOHNSON.

Respondent.

Docket Number 2023-0128

CG Enforcement Activity Number 7626891

CONSENT ORDER

Issued: Julv 7. 2023

Br,: Honorable Georse J. Jordan. Administra tive Lax Judse

Appearanccs:

LCDR MATTIIEW ROMERO

USCG Sector Puget Sound

For the Coast Guard

JAMES PATRICK JOHNSON' Pra 'se

For the ResPondent

I
o VING SE A EN'IENT

On March 28,2023. the parties in this case submitted an Amended otion fbr

of Settlement Agreement and Entry of Consent Order to be approved as a emenl the case

under 33 C.F.R. S 20.502

I have carefully reviewed the terms of the Settlement Agreement find it is and

reasonable and in substantial compliance with the requirements of 33 C.F $ 20.s02

ORDER

L.lpon consideration of the record, it is hereby ORDERED, the S ement A IS

APPROVED in full and incorporated herein by reference. This Consent

full. final, and complete adjudication of this proceeding.

SO ORDERED.

Done and dated, July 7 ,2023,

seattle, washington

Ceorge J. Jordan

sha ll t Lrtc

Administrative Law Judge

United States Coast Cuard

2

z-
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

      We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No.'s 333-86513, 333-86567 and 333-59803) pertaining to
the 1993 Stock Option Plan and 1995 Stock Incentive Plan of Document Sciences
Corporation of our report dated January 24, 2003, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Document Sciences Corporation included in
the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.


                                                        /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

San Diego, California
March 20, 2003
EXHIBIT 31.1

Certification

I, Kevan Casey, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of eLinear, Inc.;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control
over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:

a.     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

b.     Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision,
to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles;

c.     Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

5.     The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a.     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: May 24, 2004


/s/ Kevan Casey
------------------------------
Kevan Casey, Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Johnny Ortega, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vinik, J.), rendered November 7, 1983, convicting him of attempted burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Rubin, Kunzeman and Spatt, JJ., concur.