alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Chief Special Master’s Statement on Special Processing Unit Claims

As the Vaccine Guidelines (published herein on this website) explain, certain kinds 

of cases that appear at the outset to be likely to settle (like Table claims) are assigned to 

the Chief Special Master, who manages the cases within the Office of Special Masters’ 

“Special Processing Unit” (SPU). The Chief Special Master decides case outcome in the 

same manner that all Vaccine Act claims assigned to the other special masters are 

resolved. The SPU is intended to assist the Chief Special Master in providing a faster 

process for resolving these claims (and in expediting the process by which obviously

entitlement-worthy claims reach a damages award).

It is important that petitioners understand the role the Staff Attorneys play in SPU 

cases. Staff Attorneys arrange conference calls with SPU-assigned litigants – sometimes 

to ascertain scheduling matters, determine settlement progress, or to ask questions of 

the parties about their respective positions on factual matters. They also review the filed 

materials, record the parties’ positions, and help the Chief Special Master understand the 

disputed issues in a given case.

In so doing, Staff Attorneys are not acting as surrogates for the Chief Special 

Master. OSM Staff Attorneys have no decisional authority in the cases they 

procedurally manage, and cannot as a matter of law be delegated any such 

authority. In any circumstance in which a judicial decision or determination of any kind 

is to be made in an SPU case, only the Chief Special Master has the authority to make 

that decision/determination. Although litigants are directed to coordinate all questions in 

SPU cases through Staff Attorneys, and can expect to be asked questions by Staff 

Attorneys about their claims and the evidentiary support they possess, Staff Attorneys 

may not require the submission of evidence, testimony, documents, or any other 

information. Litigants should not otherwise ask the Staff Attorneys to make a decision or 

determination in an SPU case.
# C_2022099EN.01024101.xml

| 1.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 99/241 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 99/241

---

P9_TA(2021)0324

Internal Security Fund ***II

European Parliament legislative resolution of 6 July 2021 on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Internal Security Fund (06488/1/2021 — C9-0227/2021 — 2018/0250(COD))

(Ordinary legislative procedure: second reading)

(2022/C 99/33)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the Council position at first reading (06488/1/2021 — C9-0227/2021), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Council position at first reading (06488/1/2021 — C9-0227/2021),

| — | having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 18 October 2018 (1), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 18 October 2018 (1),

| — | having regard to its position at first reading (2) on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2018)0472), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to its position at first reading (2) on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2018)0472),

| — | having regard to Article 294(7) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 294(7) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

| — | having regard to the provisional agreement approved by the committee responsible under Rule 74(4) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the provisional agreement approved by the committee responsible under Rule 74(4) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to Rule 67 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 67 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A9-0221/2021), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A9-0221/2021),

| 1. | Approves the Council position at first reading; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Notes that the act is adopted in accordance with the Council position; |
| --- | --- |

2.

| 3. | Instructs its President to sign the act with the President of the Council, in accordance with Article 297(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

3.

| 4. | Instructs its Secretary-General to sign the act, once it has been verified that all the procedures have been duly completed, and, in agreement with the Secretary-General of the Council, to arrange for its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

4.

| 5. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments. |
| --- | --- |

5.

---

(1)  OJ C 62, 15.2.2019, p. 189.

(2)  OJ C 23, 21.1.2021, p. 451.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001018757  
<NAME> CEL GOLF GROUP, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Listen

# Advisory Committees News

Pennsylvania Advisory Committee Releases Report on Fair Housing Access & Zoning Practices
July 28, 2023

South Dakota Advisory Committee Releases Report on Voting Rights and Access in South Dakota
July 12, 2023

Virginia Advisory Committee Releases Report on Police Oversight and Accountability
June 29, 2023

Connecticut Advisory Committee Releases Report on the Civil Rights Implications of Algorithms
April 18, 2023

New York Advisory Committee to the U. S. Commission on Civil Rights Final Call for Panelists (5/22/2023 Deadline to Submit)
April 5, 2023

Connecticut Advisory Committee Releases Memorandum Calling for Regulations on Algorithms
February 21, 2023

Massachusetts Advisory Committee Releases Policy Brief on Water Access Equity and Utility Reporting Requirements
January 27, 2023

Arkansas Advisory Committee Releases Report: IDEA Compliance and Implementation in Arkansas Schools
January 26, 2023

New York Advisory Committee Announces 2023 Public Briefings on Examining the New York Child Welfare System and its Impact on Black Children and Families
January 12, 2023

Illinois Advisory Committee Releases Report on Equal Access to Post-Secondary Education
December 6, 2022

-    First  
-    Previous  
-  1 
-  2 
-  3 
-   ...  
-   Next  
-   Last  

-  All News 
-  Commission News 
-  Advisory Committees News 
-  Correspondence 
-  Videos 
-  Archives 

## Meetings

### Recent and Upcoming

U.S. Virgin Islands Advisory Committee Community Forum
April 10, 2024

Arizona Advisory Committee Public Web Briefing on Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Pediatric Healthcare - Panel IV
March 26, 2024

VIEW ALL
EXHIBIT 21.1

                   SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT


Hyperion Enhanced Networks of Virginia, Inc. (Delaware corporation)

Hyperion Telecommunications of Arkansas, Inc. (Delaware corporation)

               Entergy Hyperion Telecommunications of Arkansas, L.L.C.
               (50% owned) (an Arkansas limited liability company)

Hyperion Telecommunications of Florida, Inc. (Florida corporation)

               Continental Fiber Technologies, Inc. (20% owned) (Florida
                corporation)

Hyperion Telecommunications of Kansas, Inc. (Delaware corporation)

               Multimedia Hyperion Telecommunications (49.9% owned)
                (Kansas general partnership)

Hyperion Telecommunications of Kentucky, Inc. (Delaware corporation)

               Louisville Lightwave (50% owned) (New Jersey general partnership)

Hyperion Telecommunications of Louisiana, Inc. (Delaware corporation)

               Entergy Hyperion Telecommunications of Louisiana, L.L.C.
                (50% owned) (an Arkansas limited liability company)

Hyperion Telecommunications of Mississippi, Inc. (Delaware corporation)

               Entergy Hyperion Telecommunications of Mississippi, L.L.C.
                (50% owned) (an Arkansas limited liability company)

Hyperion Telecommunications of New Jersey, Inc. (Delaware corporation)

               New Jersey Fiber Technologies (19.7% owned) (New Jersey general
                partnership)

Hyperion Telecommunications of New York, Inc. (Delaware corporation)

               NHT Partnership (40% owned) (New York general partnership)

               NewChannels Hyperion Telecommunications (50% owned) (New York
                general partnership)

Hyperion Telecommunications of Pennsylvania, Inc. (Delaware corporation)

               PECO Hyperion Telecommunications (50% owned) (Pennsylvania
                general partnership)

               Hyperion Telecommunications of Harrisburg (50% owned)
                (Pennsylvania general partnership)

               Hyperion Susquehanna Telecommunications (50% owned)
                (Pennsylvania general partnership)


<PAGE>



Hyperion Telecommunications of Tennessee, Inc. (Delaware corporation)

               AVR of Tennessee, L.P. d/b/a Hyperion of Tennessee, L.P.
                (95% owned) (California limited partnership)

Hyperion Telecommunications of Vermont, Inc. (Delaware corporation)

Hyperion Telecommunications of Virginia, Inc. (Virginia corporation)

               Alternet of Virginia (37% owned) (Virginia general partnership)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Hashim Buckman, Appellant.

Memorandum: The People’s use of the prior testimony of defendant’s accomplice for impeachment purposes did not *1041violate the hearsay rule or defendant’s confrontation rights. The hearsay rule bars the admission of an out-of-court statement offered for the truth of the facts asserted therein. Here, the prior inconsistent testimony of Harris was not admitted for the truth of the statement inculpating defendant, but rather to impeach the credibility of Harris and his out-of-court statements exculpating defendant and the court gave proper limiting instructions to that effect. The fact that the People were attempting to impeach a hearsay declarant, as opposed to an in-court witness, does not bar use of the former testimony as a prior inconsistent statement *(see,*Fisch, New York Evidence § 904, at 528 [2d ed]; Richardson, Evidence §§ 355, 502 [Prince 10th ed]; McCormick, Evidence § 37, at 73-74 [Cleary 2d ed]).

We have reviewed the other issues raised, and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Boehm, J. — petit larceny.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Denman, Boomer and Schnepp, JJ.
#### Stinson *v.*The State.

Appeal from Cherokee Circuit Court.

Tried before the Hon. J. A. Bilbro.

No counsel marked as appearing for appellant.

Chas. G. Brown, Attorney-General, for the State.

The appellant ivas indicted, tried and convicted for selling spirituous, vinous and malt liquors without a license and contrary to law.

On the review of the evidence on the present appeal, the court holds that the general affirmative charge requested by the defendant should have been given.

The judgment of conviction is reversed and the cause remanded.

Opinion by

Tyson, J.
# C_2009097EN.01000201.xml

| 28.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 97/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 97/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5462 — Thomas Cook Group/Gold Medal International)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 97/02

On 30 March 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5462. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5462. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

M.A., Father of N.M.A-B., A CHILD,

Appellant, 

v.

Case No. 5D21-2244

LT Case No. 2018-DP-000131

GUARDIAN AD LITEM, 

 Appellee. 

________________________________/ 

Decision filed May 11, 2022

Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Osceola County, 

Daniel Dawson, Judge. 

Thomas J. Butler, of Thomas Butler, P.A., 

Miami Beach, for Appellant. 

Sara E. Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals,

and Samantha C. Valley, Senior Attorney, of 

Statewide Guardian Ad Litem Program, 

Tallahassee, for Guardian Ad Litem. 

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED. 

LAMBERT, C.J., COHEN and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
Listen

# FY 2023 No FEAR Act Report

April 7, 2023

2023 Second Quarter Report

-  All Reports 
-  Annual Statutory Enforcement 
-  Briefing Reports 
-  Advisory Committees Reports 
-  Budget and Performance 
-  FOIA Reports 
-  Data Inventory Program 
-  Civil Rights Complaints 
-  Historical Publications 
-  Archives
Exhibit 10.12 


 


SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT


[Unofficial English Translation]


 


PARTY A: Dongguan Huadeng Industry Investment
Co., Ltd.


PARTY B: Dongguan Enliqi Electronic Technology
Co., Ltd.


 


Party A and Party B signed Property Lease Agreement
on September 17, 2019 and Supplemental Agreement on February 27, 2020 for Party A to lease Unit 501, Block 3, 105 Yati South 1st Road,
Qiaotou Town, Dongguan, and 17 dormitory rooms to Party B for use. The lease expiration date is November 30, 2020. As the lease is expiring
soon, both parties hereby enter into this supplemental agreement on an equal, fair, and voluntary basis following friendly discussions:


 


		1.	Party A and Party B agree to extend the lease expiration date from November 30, 2020 to December 31, 2020.



		2.	During the period of the extension agreed between Party A and Party B, Party B agrees to pay Party A rent
for the factory premises at the rate of RMB 16/square meter/month, as well as rent for the dormitory at the rate of RMB 580/room/month.



		3.	Unless otherwise agreed herein, all other matters shall be handled according to the provisions of the Property
Lease Agreement signed on September 17, 2019.



		4.	This Supplemental Agreement constitutes an effective part of and has the same legal force as the Property
Lease Agreement.



		5.	This Supplemental Agreement shall enter into force on the date it is signed and sealed by Party A and Party
B.



		6.	This Supplemental Agreement is prepared in duplicate. Both parties shall hold one copy each. All copies have
the same legal force.



 


Party A’s official seal: Dongguan Huadeng Industry
Investment Co., Ltd. (Seal Affixed)


Representative’s signature: /s/ Yiwei
Yang (Fingerprint Affixed)


Date: November 6, 2020


 


Party B’s official seal: Dongguan Enliqi Electronic
Technology Co., Ltd. (Seal Affixed)


Representative’s signature: /s/ Dexiong
Zhang


Date: November 6, 2020
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research Special Emphasis Panel; Clinical Studies.                    

*Date:*                         October 14, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Yun Mei, MD, Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Natl Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Suite #670, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 827-4639,                         *yun.mei@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.121, Oral Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 13, 2021.

Melanie J. Pantoja,

Program Analyst,  Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-20071 Filed 9-16-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J E S US R AMOS VA L L E J O, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 74840 A ge nc yN o. A 092- 060- 411 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r13, 2010 ** B efo re: S IL V E R M A N , C A L L A H A N , an dN . R . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. J e s us R am os V a l l e

j o, ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of the B oar d of

I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ or de rs um m ar i l ya f f i rm i ng an i m m i gr a t i on j u d g e ’ s ( “ I J ” ) r e m o v a l o r d e r . We d i s m i s s th e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. 

# FI LED

SEP 24 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 74840 2 T hi s c ourtl a c ks j ur i s di c t i on t o r e vi e w the I J ’ s di s c r e t i onaryde t e rm i na t i on th a t R am o s V a lle

jo d idn o t m e r it c an c e lla tio n o f r e m o v a l. See R om ero-T orres v . A s h c r o ft , 3 2 7 F .3 d8 8 7 , 8 9 0 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 3 ) ( th is c o u rt la c k s ju r is d ic tio n to consi der “ al l di sc re t i on ary dec i si on s i nv ol ved i n the cancel l at i on of re m ov al cont ext , i ncl ud i ng the ul t i m at e di sc re t i on ary dec i si on t o d eny r el i ef ”) . R am os V al l ej o’ s c on t ent i on thatthe IJfa i l ed t o p roperl y w ei gh hi s e qu i t i es i s notsupp ort ed by the re cord and d oes notam ou ntt o a col orabl e c l ai m ov erw hi ch w e h av e ju r is d ic tio n . See Mendez- Castro v. Mukasey , 55 2 F . 3d 97 5, 98 0 (9th C i r. 20 09 ). R am os V a l l e

j o’ s r e m a i ni ng c ont e nt i on i s unava i l i ng. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DI S MI S S E D.