alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Vance *et al. v.*McElroy, Admr.

Appeal from Bibb Probate Court.

Heard 'before the Hon. W. L. Pratt.

Ellison & Thompson, Lavender & Fuller, for appellants.

Logan & VandeGraaff, for appellee.

The transcript in this case contains only a bill of exceptions, and there is shown no judgment from which the appeal is taken, otherwise than as copied in the bill of exceptions.

It is held by the court that the office of the bill of exceptions is not to present matter "which should appear of record proper in the court below, and that the court will not look to a judgment copied into the bill of exceptions or consider such judgment as the record of the court.

The appeal is, therefore, dismissed.

Opinion by

Dowdell, J.
# C_2021245EN.01000401.xml

| 24.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10241 — Colony Capital/Liberty Global/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 245/04)

On 18 June 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10241. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10241. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
EXHIBIT 31.1

I, Antonio Milici, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB-A of GeneThera, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report
(the Evaluation Date"); and

      c) presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

      a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this report
whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


  Date: April 14, 2004


  By: /s/ Antonio Milici
      Antonio Milici, M.D., Ph.D., President

                                       21
#### ROMER, Respondent, v. STEINWAY RY. CO. OF LONG ISLAND CITY, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 6, 1896.)

Action by James Isaac Bomer against the Steinway Bailway Company of Long Island City.

No opinion. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
EXHIBIT 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Harold Rashbaum, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
of Shopnet.com, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my
knowledge:

     (1)  the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year
          ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
          requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
          Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated: November 25, 2003

                                    /s/ Harold Rashbaum
                                    Harold Rashbaum
                                    Principal Executive Officer and
                                    Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 23.1
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Post-Effective Amendment No. 2
to Registration Statement No. 333-12619 on Form S-3 (formerly Form S-1), and
Registration Statement No. 333-62539 of Hyperion Telecommunications, Inc. on
Form S-8 of our report dated May 17, 1999, appearing in this Transition Report
on Form 10-K of Hyperion Telecommunications, Inc. for the nine months ended
December 31, 1998.





/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
     Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania


May 25, 1999
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7284

BASIL W. AKBAR, a/k/a Melvin T. Brown,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL MCCALL, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

No. 13-7286

BASIL W. AKBAR,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL MCCALL,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District 

of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. David C. Norton, District 

Judge. (0:13-cv-00549-DCN; 0:13-cv-00702-DCN)

Submitted: October 17, 2013 Decided: October 21, 2013

Before AGEE, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
2

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Basil Akbar, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Basil Akbar seeks to 

appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation 

of the magistrate judge and dismissing as unauthorized Akbar’s 

successive 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petitions. The order is not 

appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Akbar has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny the certificates of appealability and dismiss the appeals. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
4

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Skip to main content

Privacy Policy•Site map

# Judicial Conduct Opinions 2024

CL-24-90380

CL-24-90383

CL-24-90384

CL-24-90385

CL-24-90386

CL-24-90387

CL-24-90388

Howard T. Markey National Courts Building • 717 Madison Place, NW, Washington, DC 20439 • 202-357-6400
Listen

# Commissioners

The United States Commission on Civil Rights is composed of eight Commissioners: four appointed by the President and four by Congress. Not more than four members shall at any one time be of the same political party.

The President also designates the Chairperson and Vice Chairperson from among the Commission's members with the concurrence of a majority of the Commission's members.

The Commissioners serve 6-year terms. No Senate confirmation is required. The President may remove a member of the Commission only for neglect of duty or malfeasance in office.

## Presidential Appointees

**CHAIR**   **Rochelle Garza**     DEMOCRAT     Term Ends: Dec 2028

**VICE CHAIR**   **Victoria Nourse**     DEMOCRAT     Term Ends: Dec 2028

**Stephen Gilchrist**     REPUBLICAN     Term Ends: Nov 2025

**J. Christian Adams**     REPUBLICAN     Term Ends: Dec 2025

## Congressional Appointees

**Mondaire Jones**     DEMOCRAT     Term Ends: Dec 2028

**Glenn Magpantay**     DEMOCRAT     Term Ends: Dec 2028

**Peter Kirsanow**     REPUBLICAN     Term Ends: Dec 2025

**Gail Heriot**     INDEPENDENT     Term Ends: Dec 2025

 

View our Former Commissioners

-  Our Mission 
-  Commissioners 
-  Offices and Staff 
-  Careers 
-  Acquisition Opportunities 
-  Rankin Memorial Library 
-  FAQs
# C_2021403EN.01000301.xml

| 6.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 403/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 403/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10414 – Apollo Management/AS Graanul)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 403/03)

On 16 September 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10414. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10414. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
United States Court of Federal Claims

_________________________________________

)

)

ELECTRONIC FILING FEE REFUND POLICY )

)

_________________________________________ )

ORDER

This Order establishes procedures for the refund of duplicate or erroneously paid filing 

fees that are generated during the electronic filing of documents. The Judicial Conference of the 

United States has generally prohibited the refund of filing fees (JCUS-MAR 49). However, in 

March 2005, the Judicial Conference of the United States issued guidance endorsing limited 

refund authority by the courts as a result of the increased likelihood of inadvertent, erroneous, or 

duplicate payments made by parties using the Case Management/Electronic Case Files 

(CM/ECF) system. The Judicial Conference further advised that determining appropriate policies 

and procedures for refunding erroneously applied filing fee payments should be left to the sound 

discretion of each court.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, that the Clerk of the United States Court of Federal 

Claims, or her designee, is authorized to refund all fees erroneously paid through the Pay.gov 

electronic filing fee tool in CM/ECF when:

1. discovered by the court or clerk’s office that a fee has been paid erroneously; or

2. an attorney files a request for refund and it can be determined by the clerk or her designee 

that the fee has been erroneously paid.

Attorneys seeking a refund must submit a written application in the form of a letter. The 

letter must include the name, address, and telephone number of the party requesting the refund. 

Supporting documentation must be attached, including a copy of the electronic payment receipt 

and the Notice(s) of Electronic Filing generated from the court’s electronic CM/ECF system. The 

letter and supporting documentation must be filed electronically in the case associated with the 

erroneous payment using the CM/ECF event SEALED Filings > Sealed Motions > Request for 

Filing Fee Pay.gov Refund. 
Upon verification of the erroneous payment, the clerk’s office will process the refund to 

the same credit card used to make the erroneous payment and will make a record of the refund on 

the docket. Refund checks will not be issued.

In the event an attorney or law firm consistently errs when submitting fees and therefore

repeatedly requests refunds, the court will consider remedial action and may issue an order to 

show cause why further requests for refund should be considered.

IT IS SO ORDERED, this 14th day of February 2023. 

s/Elaine D. Kaplan 

ELAINE D. KAPLAN

Chief Judge
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0129

IN THE MATTER OF:

T.R.S.,

Respondent and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including October 25, 2021, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 20 2021

09/20/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0129
EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of SRS Labs, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Janet M. Biski, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:

|Dated: March 31, 2003 |  | By: | /s/JANET M. BISKIJanet M. Biski Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|--------------------- |  | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SRS Labs and will be retained by SRS Labs and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
# C_2021003EN.01000301.xml

| 6.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 3/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 3/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10042 — Vista Equity Partners/Francisco Partners Management/SmartBear Software)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 3/03)

On 16 December 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M10042. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M10042. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
# C_2021061EN.01000201.xml

| 22.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 61/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 61/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9676 — Lov Group/Banijay/ESG)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 61/02)

On 30 June 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9676. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9676. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
THE COMMANDANT OF THE UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 

Washington, DC 20593 

SEP 2 7 2023 

ANTI-DISCRIMINATION and 

ANTI-HARASSMENT POLICY STATEMENT 

In our Coast Guard everyone is always entitled to a workplace free from discrimination or 

harassment of any kind. Unlawful discrimination and harassment degrade our readiness 

and mission performance, and deny our active duty, Reserve, civilian, and Auxiliary 

workforce the meaningful experience they deserve in service to the American people. 

We all must have the courage to act if we observe any words or actions that do not align 

with our core values of Honor, Respect, and Devotion to Duty. Speaking up about even 

small deviations from our core values prevents unlawful discrimination or harassment from 

taking root in our workplaces. Throughout our history we have applied our principles of 

operations to successful mission execution; we must give our workplace climate the same 

transparency and attention as our operations. 

Coast Guard members who believe they have experienced or witnessed unlawful 

discrimination, harassment, reprisal for participation in Equal Employment 

Opportunity/Equal Opportunity/Whistleblower or other protected activity, bullying, hazing, or 

other disruptive behaviors, should report it promptly through their chain of command; their 

local civil rights service provider; the Coast Guard Anti-Harassment Program Management 

Office; the Department of Homeland Security, Office of the Inspector General (military and 

civilian); U.S. Office of Special Counsel (civilian); or other appropriate grievance forums. All 

complaints and reports will be processed promptly, thoroughly, impartially, and using a 

process that protects privacy. When discrimination or harassment occurs, leaders and 

managers will take swift and appropriate corrective action. See Coast Guard Commandant 

Instruction M5350.4(series) for information on the discrimination complaint process. For 

harassing behaviors, including hazing, bullying, or other inappropriate conduct, see Coast 

Guard Commandant Instruction 5350.S(series). 

The Coast Guard is devoted to an environment that promotes dignity, respect, fairness, and 

inclusion. These are essential to remaining always ready to protect, defend, and save lives. 

L.L-1..~ 

LINDA L. FAGAN 

Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard