alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

Calendar No. 585 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2288 

[Report No. 114–313] 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 1, 2015 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AUGUST 30, 2016 

Reported under authority of the order of the Senate of July 14, 2016, by Ms. 

MURKOWSKI, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To remove the use restrictions on certain land transferred 

to Rockingham County, Virginia, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF USE RESTRICTION. 

4 Public Law 101–479 (104 Stat. 1158) is amended— 

5 (1) by striking section 2(d); and 

6 (2) by adding the following new section at the 

7 end: 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2288 RS

1 ‘‘SEC. 4. REMOVAL OF USE RESTRICTION. 

2 ‘‘(a) The approximately 1-acre portion of the land re3 ferred to in section 3 that is used for purposes of a child 

4 care center, as authorized by this Act, shall not be subject 

5 to the use restriction imposed in the deed referred to in 

6 section 3. 

7 ‘‘(b) Upon enactment of this section, the Secretary 

8 of the Interior shall execute an instrument to carry out 

9 subsection (a).’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS

asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 585 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2288 

[Report No. 114–313] 

AN ACT 

To remove the use restrictions on certain land 

for other purposes. transferred to Rockingham County, Virginia, and 

AUGUST 30, 2016 

Reported without amendment 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 15, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 51384]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19943]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Granting of Requests for Early Termination of the Waiting Period 
Under the Premerger Notification Rules

    Section 7A of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. 18a, as added by Title II 
of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, requires 
persons contemplating certain mergers or acquisitions to give the 
Federal Trade Commission and the Assistant Attorney General advance 
notice and to wait designated periods before consummation of such 
plans. Section 7A(b)(2) of the Act permits the agencies, in individual 
cases, to terminate this waiting period prior to its expiration and 
requires that notice of this action be published in the Federal 
Register. The following transaction was granted early termination--on 
the date indicated--of the waiting period provided by law and the 
premerger notification rules. The listing includes the transaction 
number and the parties to the transaction. The Federal Trade Commission 
and the Assistant Attorney General for the Antitrust Division of the 
Department of Justice made the grants. Neither agency intends to take 
any action with respect to this proposed acquisitions during the 
applicable waiting period.

                                            Early Termination Granted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                   08/26/2021
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
20212939................................  G                  Alight, Inc.; Alight Solutions LLC; Aon plc; Aon
                                                              Hewitt Health Market Insurance Solutions Inc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Suzanne Morris,
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics, Antitrust Division, 
Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2021-19943 Filed 9-14-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
# C_2021461EN.01000801.xml

| 15.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 461/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 461/8

---

Corrigendum to Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10338 – GALILEO / M6 / JV)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 430 of 25 October 2021
  )

(2021/C 461/07)

Publication (2021/C 430/02) on page 2 is to be considered null and void.

---
**Exhibit31.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, CalvinE. Jenness, certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 of BlountInternational, Inc.;

2.             Based on my knowledge, thisquarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.             Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in thisquarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

                (a) designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

                (b) evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

                (c) disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors:

                (a) all significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

                (b) any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal controls.

Date: May10, 2005

 

 
| /s/Calvin E. Jenness      |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Calvin E. Jenness         |   |
| Senior Vice President and |   |
| Chief Financial Officer   |   |

 

----
# L_2010125EN.01005201.xml

| 21.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 125/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 125/52

---

POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION EUPOL AFGHANISTAN/1/2010

of 18 May 2010

concerning the appointment of the Head of Mission of EUPOL Afghanistan ad interim

(2010/292/CFSP)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 38 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2010/279/CFSP of 18 May 2010 on the European Union Police Mission in Afghanistan (EUPOL Afghanistan) (1), and in particular Article 10(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 10(1) of Decision 2010/279/CFSP, the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee, in accordance with Article 38 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purpose of political control and strategic direction of the EUPOL Afghanistan mission, including the decision to appoint a Head of Mission. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 10(1) of Decision 2010/279/CFSP, the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee, in accordance with Article 38 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purpose of political control and strategic direction of the EUPOL Afghanistan mission, including the decision to appoint a Head of Mission.

| (2) | The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy has proposed the appointment of the current Deputy Head of Mission, Chief Superintendent Nigel THOMAS, as Head of Mission ad interim from 31 May 2010 until the subsequent appointment of a new Head of Mission, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy has proposed the appointment of the current Deputy Head of Mission, Chief Superintendent Nigel THOMAS, as Head of Mission ad interim from 31 May 2010 until the subsequent appointment of a new Head of Mission,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Chief Superintendent Nigel THOMAS is hereby appointed Head of Mission of the European Union Police Mission in Afghanistan as from 31 May 2010 until the subsequent appointment of a new Head of Mission.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

It shall apply until the subsequent appointment of a new Head of Mission.

Done at Brussels, 18 May 2010.

For the Political and Security Committee

The President

C. FERNÁNDEZ-ARIAS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 123, 19.5.2010, p. 4.

1

---
Skip to main content

Privacy Policy•Site map

# Court of Federal Claims Media Page

The information provided on this page is to foster cooperation between the Court and the media for coverage of trials and hearings under this Court’s jurisdiction.

The judge presiding over a case is fully responsible for the trial in their courtroom and media present must comply with any terms specified.

All questions that cannot be answered on this page may be directed to Press_Office@cfc.uscourts.gov or (202) 357-6643.

**General Courthouse Information**

United States Court of Federal ClaimsHoward T. Markey National Courts Building717 Madison Place, NWWashington, DC 20439

Location: The Court of Federal Claims is located on Madison Place between Pennsylvania Avenue and H Street, NW, on the east side of Lafayette Square.

Hours: The Clerk’s Office is open from 8:30 am to 4:30 pm

A valid government-issued photo ID such as a driver’s license or US Passport is required to enter the courthouse.

Unless otherwise directed by the court, the use of cell phones, laptops, electronic devices, iPads, e-books, recording devices, cameras, or any object that may interfere with court proceedings is not allowed in the courtroom.

Please follow the Court’s guide on Courtroom Decorum.

**Important Contact Numbers**

**General Information for the Media**

Court opinions may be retrieved using PACER.

Information regarding transcripts can be found here.

Local Rules for the Court of Federal Claims are modeled after the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The Administrative Office of the US Court has developed A Journalist’s Guide to the Federal Courts to introduce the media to the federal judicial system.

Rules for Complaints against Judges and Judicial Disciplines are modeled after 28 U.S.C. §§ 351-364.

Howard T. Markey National Courts Building • 717 Madison Place, NW, Washington, DC 20439 • 202-357-6400
Listen

# CSSBMB Reports

Inaugural Annual Report for the Commission on the Social Status of Black Men and Boys
December 27, 2022

-  All Reports 
-  Annual Statutory Enforcement 
-  Briefing Reports 
-  Advisory Committees Reports 
-  Budget and Performance 
-  FOIA Reports 
-  Data Inventory Program 
-  Civil Rights Complaints 
-  Historical Publications 
-  Archives
IN THE SUPREME COUkT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

IN RE 1998 RULES FOR

ADMISSION TO THE BAR ORDER

F MONTANA

This Court has determined that it is necessary to amend Section IV of the 1998 Rules

for Admission to the State Bar of Montana to require the use of an application form from the

State Bar of Montana for attorney applicants who desire to appearpro hat vice in a court of

this state. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that effective afla+~ /$3 , 1999,SectionIVofthe

1998 Rules for Admission to the State Bar of Montana is a ended as follows:

Montana. The apolication form will reauire that the applicant orovide the

following information:

1 . . . .

.

the State Bar of Montana. The anolication will then be reviewed bv the State

Bar of Montana which shall certifv the number of mior annearances the

applicant has been granted under Section IV-C and whether or not the

applicant has provided the requisite information. Uoon certification, the State

Bar shall forward the application and to the appropriate court. The court shall

enter an order mantine or refusing the annlication and. if the aonlicant is

refused. the court shall state its reasons. A CODY of the court’s order shall be

mailed to the annlicant. counsel of record and the State Bar of Montana. The

State Bar of Montana shall maintain a record of all DYO hnc vice aoalications

as a oublic record. Attomevs aunearing uro hnc vice shall notifv the State Bar

of Montana uuon conclusion of the matter in which the attornev auueared.
E. .

F. .

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to the State Bar of Montana to

the Administrator of the Board of Bar Examiners; to all members of the commission on

Admission Rules Revision; to West Group; to the Code Commissioner and Director of Legal

Services at the Montana Legislative Services Division; to each of the Clerks of the District

Courts of Montana; and to Sally Hilander at The Montana Lawyer magazine with the request

that this Order be publishe

DATED this /B 2

:d in the next possible issue.

$of ?ik

Chief Justice
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Edward Maybel, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Eve Preminger, J.), rendered on October 3, 1984, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Sandler, Carro, Milonas and Smith, JJ.
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02 - 12 - 00285 - CV
Mary Cummins

v.
Bat World Sanctuary and Amanda Lollar § § § § From the 352nd District Court of Tarrant County (352

- 248169

- 10) April 9, 2015 Per Curiam



### JUDGMENT This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there was error in part of the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in part and r eversed in part. We affirm that portion of the trial court’s judgment awarding actual and exemplary damages to Appellee Amanda Lollar

. We also affirm that portion of the trial court’s judgment ordering Appellant Mary Cummins to remove from the Internet t he web pages and defamatory statements specified in the judgment. We reverse that part of the trial court’s judgment permanently enjoining Appellant Mary Cummins from making similar statements in the future. We also reverse that portion of the trial

cour t’s judgment awarding damages to Appellee Bat World Sanctuary for breach of contract and attorney’s fees and render judgment that Appellee Bat WorldSanctuary take nothing on its claims for breach of contract and for attorney’s fees

. It is further ordered that Appellant Mary Cummins shall bear her own costs of this appeal and the costs of Appellee Amanda Lollar, and that Appell ee Bat World Sanctuary shall bear its own costs of this appeal, for which let execution
issue.

S ECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS
P ER CURIAM
Exhibit
32.2
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Annual Report of China Kangtai Cactus Bio-Tech, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Hong Bu, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
  (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:
December 24, 2009
 
 /s/
      Hong BuHong
      Bu
                    Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
****
 **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**
 **OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Emeritus Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly Report), I, Daniel R. Baty, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 
 1.
The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and 
 2.
The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 
 
 
 /s/ Daniel R. Baty
 Daniel R. Baty
 Chief Executive Officer
 January 27, 2005
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-88,151-01

EX PARTE RONALD JOSEPH HODGKISS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. W296-80640-2012-HC IN THE 199 DISTRICT COURT

TH

FROM COLLIN COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of one count of

sexual assault and five counts of indecency with a child. He was sentenced to twenty years’

imprisonment on the sexual assault charge and four of the indecency counts and sentenced to ten

years’ imprisonment on one of the indecency counts. He did not appeal his convictions.

Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary and he was given ineffective assistance of

counsel. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v.
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App.

1999). The trial court recommended denying relief based, in part, on the reporter’s record from the

habeas hearing. The reporter’s record from that hearing was not provided to this Court. In these

circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294

(Tex. Crim. App. 1997), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact.

The trial court shall provide this Court with the reporter’s record of the habeas hearing upon

which it based its findings of fact. The trial court may also make any other findings of fact and

conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for

habeas corpus relief, if necessary.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the

order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be

obtained from this Court. 

Filed: March 28, 2018

Do not publish
# C_2021096EN.01000401.xml

| 22.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10183 — AustralianSuper/CPPIB/Transurban/Transurban Chesapeake)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 96/04)

On 16 March 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10183. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10183. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---