alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Stephen Solowitz, Respondent, v Janet Selleck et al., Respondents, and George P. Schimpf, Appellant.

In a proceeding to invalidate a petition designating Janet Selleck, and upon her declination, George P. Schimpf as a candidate in the Conservative Party primary election to be held on September 15,1987, for the public office of County Legislator, 8th Legislative District, in the County of Suffolk, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Geiler, J.), dated August 5, 1987, which upon reargument, adhered to its prior determination granting the application.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the proceeding is dismissed, and the Suffolk County Board of Elections is directed to place the name of the appellant George P. Schimpf on the appropriate ballot.

Upon the declination of another person, the appellant Schimpf was designated as a candidate in the Conservative Party primary election for the public office of County Legislator for the 8th Legislative District, whereupon he filed an acknowledged, signed certificate in which he consented to the substitution and accepted the designation. Under these facts, the substituted candidate’s specific consent and acceptance comported with the statutory requirements *(see,*Election Law § 6-146 [1]; § 6-148 [5]), and the designating petition should not *188have been invalidated. Mellen, P. J., Mangano, Thompson, Lawrence and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
# C_2021173EN.01000101.xml

| 7.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 173/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 173/1

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria apply

(2021/C 173/01)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 16 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1).

The legal basis for this processing operation are Council; Decision 2013/255/CFSP (2), as implemented by Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2021/751 (3) , and Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 (4), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/743 (5).

The controller of this processing operation is the Department RELEX.1.C in the Directorate-General for External Relations – RELEX of the General Secretariat of the Council (GSC), that can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1.C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1.C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Decision 2013/255/CFSP, as implemented by Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2021/751 , and Regulation (EU) No 36/2012, as implemented by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/743.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil the listing criteria as laid down in Decision 2013/255/CFSP and Regulation (EU) No 36/2012.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the statement of reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions pursuant to Article 25 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725, the exercise of the rights of the data subjects such as the right of access, as well as the rights to rectification or to object will be answered in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2018/1725.

Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the restrictive measures or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Without prejudice to any judicial, administrative or non-judicial remedy, data subjects may lodge a complaint with the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2018/1725.

---

(1)  OJ L 295, 21.11.2018, p. 39.

(2)  OJ L 147, 1.6.2013, p. 14.

(3)  OJ L 160, 7.5.2021, p. 115.

(4)  OJ L 16, 19.1.2012, p. 1.

(5)  OJ L 160, 7.5.2021, p. 1.

---
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

______________
No. 95-30821 Summary Calendar

______________

ALVA POSADA-NAVES Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

KEITH HALL, Warden, Oakdale Federal Correctional Institute, Respondent-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

(CA-94-1829)

_________________________________________________________________ February 1, 1996

Before KING, SMITH, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM * :

Alva Posada-Naves ("Posada-Naves") appeals from the district

court's order denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. He argues that the "no parole"

provision of 21 U.S.C. § 960 does not apply to his conviction and

sentence because the statute did not become effective on the day of

enactment. Our review of the record on appeal reveals no

reversible error. "[A]bsent a clear direction by Congress to the

contrary, a law takes effect on the date of its enactment."

Gozlon-Peretz v. United States , 498 U.S. 395, 111 S.Ct. 840, 846,2

112 L.Ed.2d 919 (1991); see also United States v. Giltner

, 972 F.2d

1563, 1565 (11th Cir. 1992), cert. denied , ___U.S.___, 113 S.Ct.

2383, 124 L.Ed.2d 286 (1993). Thus, the "no-parole" provision

became effective on October 27, 1986 and was applicable to PosadaNaves's offense.

AFFIRMED.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v George Adorno, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Burton Roberts, J.), rendered on September 7, 1977, unanimously affirmed.

*327Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Sandler, Sullivan and Kassal, JJ.
# C_2021333EN.01000101.xml

| 19.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 333/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 333/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10344 — Accenture/Umlaut)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 333/01)

On 13 August 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10344. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10344. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Exhibit 8
  
 LETTER OF CONSENT
    Canadian Natural Resources Limited
 2500, 855 - 2nd Street SW
 Calgary, Alberta T2P 4J8
  Re:  Consent of Independent Petroleum Consultants
    To Whom It May Concern :
  We consent to the use of our report with respect to the reserves data of Canadian Natural Resources Limited incorporated by reference in its
  (i)
Annual Report (Form 40-F) for the year ended December 31, 2009.
  (ii)
Registration Statement on Form F-9 (File No. 333-162270), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
   Yours very trul y,



GLJ PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS LTD.
   Dated March 24, 2010
 Calgary, Alberta
 CANADA
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM






We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-157131 and 333-162143 on Forms S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-161288, 333-161289, 333-114436, 333-128793, 333-118812, 333-91184, 333-89839, and 333-32681 on Forms S-8 of our reports dated March 14, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Sun Bancorp, Inc. and the effectiveness of Sun Bancorp, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sun Bancorp, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010.




















Philadelphia, PA


March 14, 2011
Exhibit 99.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Patrick J. Bagley, the Chief Financial Officer of Dover
Motorsports, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | the Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2002 (the Form 10-K), fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: March 13, 2003





|/S/    PATRICK J. BAGLEY                                                
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Patrick J. Bagley Sr. Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

_________________________________

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

Complainant

vs.

STEPHEN J. GRAVOLET

Respondent

_________________________________

Docket Number 2023-0397

Enforcement Activity No. 7800072

CONSENT ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

On November 2, 2023, the parties in this case submitted a Motion for Approval of a 

Settlement Agreement and Entry of Consent Order to be approved as a settlement of the case 

under 33 C.F.R. § 20.502.

I have carefully reviewed the terms of the Settlement Agreement and find that it is fair 

and reasonable and in substantial compliance with the requirements of 33 C.F.R. § 20.502.

ORDER

Upon consideration of record, it is hereby ORDERED that the Settlement Agreement is 

APPROVED in full and incorporated herein by reference. This Consent Order shall constitute 

full, final, and complete adjudication of this proceeding.

Done and Dated November 20, 2023 at

New Orleans, LA

_________________________________

HON. BRIAN J. CURLEY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,838,797
<SECURITIES>                                     2,923,283
<RECEIVABLES>                                      435,818
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                         56,082
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,434,250
<PP&E>                                           1,036,613
<DEPRECIATION>                                      24,049
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,159,199
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              553,011
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            18,737
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,510,096
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,159,199
<SALES>                                            203,878
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   370,432
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,340,843
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (977,590)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (977,590)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (977,590)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.06)



</TABLE>
| datetime   | spillway release |
|------------|------------------|
| 2009-09-01 | 0.0              |
| 2009-09-02 | 0.0              |
| 2009-09-03 | 0.0              |
| 2009-09-04 | 0.0              |
| 2009-09-05 | 0.0              |
| 2009-09-06 | 0.0              |
| 2009-09-07 | 0.0              |
| 2009-09-08 | 0.0              |
| 2009-09-09 | 0.0              |
| 2009-09-10 | 0.0              |
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 180 (Tuesday, September 21, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 52470]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-20318]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than October 21, 2021.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Readlyn Bancshares, Inc., Readlyn, Iowa; to merge with Tripoli 
Bancshares, Inc., Saint Paul, Minnesota, and thereby indirectly acquire 
American Savings Bank, Tripoli, Iowa. As part of the merger, Readlyn 
Bancshares, Inc. to acquire an additional 15 percent of the voting 
shares, for a total of 35 percent of the voting shares of Nashua 
Bancshares, Inc., Saint Paul, Minnesota.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 15, 
2021.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2021-20318 Filed 9-20-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
----

**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of China Kangtai CactusBio-Tech, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the "Report"), I, Hong Bu, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adoptedpursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany. 

Date:April 15, 2011 

/s/ HongBu                                                                                    Hong Bu, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer

----
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of NMT Medical, Inc.
(the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, John E. Ahern, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                                                    
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 23, 2005 |  |  |  | /S/ JOHN E. AHERN                                  
|                     |  |  |  | John E. Ahern President and Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1371

DAMIEN BARKER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

COMPUTER SCIENCE CORPORATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District 

Judge. (1:13-cv-00857-LO-MSN)

Submitted: August 20, 2015 Decided: August 24, 2015

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Damien Barker, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Richard Ward, III, 

KULLMAN LAW FIRM, New Orleans, Louisiana; Frank Daniel Wood, 

Jr., KULLMAN FIRM, Birmingham, Alabama, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Damien Barker appeals the district court’s order granting 

Computer Science Corporation’s summary judgment motion on his 

harassment and discriminatory and retaliatory termination 

claims, brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2012). We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm the district court’s judgment. Barker v. Computer 

Science Corp., No. 1:13-cv-00857 (E.D. Va. Mar. 27, 2015). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 10.35

REVISED SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENT

APPLICABLE TO THE COMPANYS NAMED EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS

As of March 12, 2007, the following represents the compensation of the executive officers of NMT Medical, Inc. (the
Company):



|                                                                     |  |                   |         |                                  |   |         |                                                 |  |       
|-------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------- | ------- | -------------------------------- | - | ------- | ----------------------------------------------- |  | ------
|                                                                     |  | 2007 Compensation
|Executive Officer                                                    |  | AnnualSalary      |         | Bonus for Work Performed in 2006 |   |         | Shares Underlying Stock Options Granted in
2006
|John E. AhernPresident and Chief Executive Officer                   |  | $                 | 400,000 |                                  | $ | 0       |                                                 |  | 50,000
|Richard E. DavisExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  | $                 | 300,000 |                                  | $ | 135,000 | (1)                                             |  | 0     

---

|(1) | Mr. Davis bonus was paid in accordance with the terms of that certain Amended and Restated Employment Agreement that he entered into with the Company on May 20,
2004, which is filed as an exhibit to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as filed with the SEC on August 10, 2004.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARI)

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

Complainant

VS

ADRIAN BROWN

Respondent

Docket Number 2023-01 53

Enforcement Activity No. 7655013

CONSENT ORDER

Issued: April 25. 2023

Bv Administrative Law Judse: Honorable Timothv G. Stueve

Appearances:

LT Bobbi-Jo Robertson

USCG Sector Mobile

For the Coast Guard

Adrian Brown, Pro Se

For Respondent
CON T ORDE

On or about March29,2023, the parties in this case submitted a Motion for Approval of

Settlement Agreement and Entry ofConsent Order to be approved as a settlement ofthe case

under 33 C.F.R. $ 20.502.

I have carefully reviewed the terms of the Settlement Agreement and find it is fair and

reasonable and in substantial compliance with the requirements of33 C.F.R. {i 20.502.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the record, it is hereby ORDERED, the Settlement Agreement is

APPROVED in full and incorporated herein by reference. This Consent Order shall constitute

full, final, and complete adjudication of this proceeding.

Done and dated Api125,2023, at

Alameda, California

Timothy G. Stueve

Administrative Law Judge

U.S. Coast Guard

APPROVING SETTL NT AGREE NT