alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
January 25, 1999


                                LOCK UP AGREEMENT


        The undersigned, holders in the aggregate of 3,595,000 shares of
common stock, $.001 par value of Path 1 Network Technologies Inc. ("Path 1")
("Shares"), hereby agree that until February 1, 2000, none of them shall
either offer for sale or sell any Shares, except for Franklin S. Felber
("Felber") who has the right to sell Shares pursuant to the terms of a
separate Option Agreement dated today (the "Option Agreement") between Felber
and Jyra Research Inc. ("Jyra") pursuant to which Felber has granted to Jyra
an irrevocable option to purchase up to 255,640 Shares. The restrictions
agreed to herein shall automatically lapse and be of no force or effect in the
event of any sales made in the context of a tender offer, merger, or other
takeover involving Path 1.

         In the event that Jyra does not exercise that certain option to
purchase up to a total of 255,640 Shares in accordance with the terms of the
Option Agreement, Felber shall not be bound by the resale restrictions herein
respecting any and all such 255,640 Shares optioned to, but not purchased by,
Jyra and, in such event, shall be free to sell any such Shares in accordance
with the provisions of Rule 144.

         The balance of the Shares held by Felber, viz. 255,640 Shares, shall
continue to be subject to the terms of this agreement.

         This agreement shall not be effective unless signed by all parties
listed below.


  /s/ Ronald D. Fellman                                /s/ Franklin S. Felber
-----------------------                              ------------------------
Ronald D. Fellman                                    Franklin S. Felber


  /s/ Rona Berns                                       /s/ James Berns
- - ----------------                                     -----------------
Rona Berns                                           James Berns


  /s/ Douglas Palmer                                   /s/ John Hooker
- - --------------------                                 -----------------
Douglas Palmer                                       John Hooker
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2165 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend for one year the 

above-the-line deduction for qualified tuition and related expenses. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 30, 2015 

Mr. GRAYSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

for one year the above-the-line deduction for qualified 

tuition and related expenses. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF ABOVE-THE-LINE DEDUCTION 

4 FOR QUALIFIED TUITION AND RELATED EX5 PENSES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (e) of section 222 of 

7 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

8 ‘‘December 31, 2014’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 

9 2015’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2165 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 December 31, 2014. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Listen

# FY 2021 No FEAR Act Report

October 5, 2021

2021 Full Report

2021 Second Quarter Report

-  All Reports 
-  Annual Statutory Enforcement 
-  Briefing Reports 
-  Advisory Committees Reports 
-  Budget and Performance 
-  FOIA Reports 
-  Data Inventory Program 
-  Civil Rights Complaints 
-  Historical Publications 
-  Archives
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Allan Rowley, ChiefFinancial Officer of  MGT Capital Investments, Inc. (the “Company”),certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

 
| (1)    |                                                                                                                                                                                  | the Quarterly Report on  Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008         |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (the “Report”) fully  complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));  and |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                  |                                                                                                         |
| (2)    |                                                                                                                                                                                  | the information contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial  condition |
|   | and results of operations  of the Company.                                                                                                                                            |
|        |                                                                                                                                                                                       |                                                                                                              |  |  |

 
|              | By:    | /s/ ALLAN ROWLEY        |
|-------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|              |   | Allan Rowley            |   |
|              |   | Chief Financial Officer |   |
| May 12, 2008 |   |                    |   |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from SEC Form
10-KSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>        
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,821,014
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,015,468
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (5,631)
<INVENTORY>                                     28,159
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,250,148
<PP&E>                                       2,892,972
<DEPRECIATION>                              (1,260,825)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,307,535
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,938,241
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,727
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,738,262  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,307,535
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,507,370
<CGS>                                                0  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,570,840
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,394,659        
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             219,089
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,049,334)  
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (366,925)      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (682,409)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (682,409)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.37)
        

</TABLE>
Supreme Court of Florida

____________

No. SC17-2086

____________

PAUL ANTHONY BROWN,

Appellant,

vs.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

[February 28, 2018]

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Paul Anthony Brown’s appeal of the circuit court’s 

order denying Brown’s motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 3.851. This Court has jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. 

Brown’s motion sought relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court’s 

decision in Hurst v. Florida, 136 S. Ct. 616 (2016), and our decision on remand in 

Hurst v. State (Hurst), 202 So. 3d 40 (Fla. 2016), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 2161 

(2017). After this Court decided Hitchcock v. State, 226 So. 3d 216 (Fla.), cert. 

denied, 138 S. Ct. 513 (2017), Brown responded to this Court’s order to show 

cause arguing why Hitchcock should not be dispositive in this case.
- 2 -

After reviewing Brown’s response to the order to show cause, as well as the 

State’s arguments in reply, we conclude that Brown is not entitled to relief. Brown

was sentenced to death following a jury’s unanimous recommendation for death. 

Brown v. State, 721 So. 2d 274, 276-77 (Fla. 1998). Brown’s sentence of death 

became final in 1999. Brown v. Florida, 526 U.S. 1102 (1999). Thus, Hurst does 

not apply retroactively to Brown’s sentence of death. See Hitchcock, 226 So. 3d at 

217. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Brown’s motion.

The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Brown, we 

caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so 

ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion.

LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result.

PARIENTE, J., concurring in result.

I concur in result because I recognize that this Court’s opinion in Hitchcock 

v. State, 226 So. 3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 513 (2017), is now 

final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting 

opinion in Hitchcock.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court in and for Volusia County, 

Terence R. Perkins, Judge - Case No. 641992CF034756XXXAES

Linda McDermott of McClain & McDermott, P.A., Estero, Florida,

for Appellant
- 3 -

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, and Doris Meacham,

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, Florida, 

for Appellee
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 202 

To amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992 to rename 

a site of the park. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 7, 2015 

Mr. TURNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act 

of 1992 to rename a site of the park. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO THE DAYTON AVIATION HER4 ITAGE PRESERVATION ACT OF 1992. 

5 Section 101(b)(5) of the Dayton Aviation Heritage 

6 Preservation Act of 1992 (16 U.S.C. 410ww(b)(5)) is 

7 amended by striking ‘‘Aviation Center’’ and inserting 

8 ‘‘National Museum’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Skip to main content

Privacy Policy•Site map

# New Cases Involving the Addicks and Barker Flood-Control Reservoirs in Houston, Texas

**Upstream Cases:** The Short-Form Complaint available here is required for all new cases directly or indirectly related to In Re Upstream Addicks and Barker (Texas) Flood-Control Reservoirs v. United States, Sub-Master Docket No. 17-9001.

**Downstream Cases:** The Short-Form Complaint available here is required for all new cases directly or indirectly related to In Re Downstream Addicks and Barker (Texas) Flood-Control Reservoirs v. United States, Sub-Master Docket No. 17-9002.

Howard T. Markey National Courts Building • 717 Madison Place, NW, Washington, DC 20439 • 202-357-6400
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 11 , 2013 

# Order

Clerk July 11 , 2013

145646 ( 85 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 145646

COA: 301546

Lenawee CC: 09

- 014365

- FC

JEFFERY ALAN DOUGLAS,

Defendant

- Appellee.

______________________________ /

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to allow counsel for defendant to

withdraw is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that the matter is remanded to the

Lenawee Circuit Court to determine, in accordance with Administrative Order 2003

- 03,

whether the defendant is indigent and, if so, to appoint the State Appellate Defender

Office to represent the defendant in this Court. A copy of the circuit court’s order of

appointment or denial thereof shall be promptly sent to this Court.

This Court retains jurisdiction.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information derived from Kiddie Academy
International, Inc.'s unaudited financial statements for the twenty-eight weeks
ended April 13, 1997, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements and the notes thereto.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   7-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-13-1997
<CASH>                                             396
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      133
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        102
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,662
<PP&E>                                           1,099
<DEPRECIATION>                                     378
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,768
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,341
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            20
<OTHER-SE>                                       (198)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,768
<SALES>                                          4,285
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,285
<CGS>                                            5,269
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,269
[OTHER-INCOME]                                     151
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
[INTEREST-INCOME]                                    8
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (825)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (825)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (825)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.41)
        

</TABLE>
I 

AO 442 (Rev. 01/09) Arrest Warrant 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

To: 

United States of America 

v. 

SHAWNA COX, et al 

Defendant 

Any authorized law enforcement officer 

UNDER SEAL 

for the Adi()/ IM '1617:{) ?OSliGOO> 

District of Oregon 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

-SEB if 16 f :16PM 

U.S. 11ARSHALS SERlJI CE 

Case No. 3:16-cr-00051-AA-07 

ARREST WARRANT .. ........ 

O'l 

......... 

w 

J:i,. 

YOU ARE COMMANDED to arrest and bring before a United States magistrate judge without unnecessary delay i 

(name of person to be arrested) SHAWNA COX i 

who is accused of an offense or violation based on the following document filed with the court: 

rf Indictment 0 Superseding Indictment 0 Information 0 Superseding Information 0 Complaint 

0 Probation Violation Petition 0 Supervised Release Violati3~~tion OViolation Notice 0 Order of the Court 

This offense is briefly described as follows: 

[; y 

Date: 02/03/2016 

City and State: --~P_,o=rt-=l=a=n=d"-, O==R-=----

Return 

This warrant was received on (date) 

at (city and state) 

_______ , and the person was arrested on (date) 

Date: _______ _ 

Arresting officer's signature 

Printed name and title 

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 323 Filed 03/10/16 Page 1 of 1
# Patent

## Title
Dynamically illuminated footwear

## Abstract

Although the invention, as has been described, is deemed to be that which would form the preferred embodiment, it is recognized that departures may be made therefrom without departing from the scope of the invention which is not to be limited to the details disclosed, but is to be accorded the full scope of the claims so as to include any and all equivalent shoes.

## Background
## Claims

1. A flexible orthopedic sole having a medial wedge forming part of the lower surface in the heel portion thereof which gradually slopes laterally and forwardly to become integral with the normal sole surface, said sole being filled in and curving upwardly in the area of the plantar arch, terminating such that the medial side of the sole forms essentially a straight line extending from the heel of the sole to the portion of the sole adapted to accommodate the medial side of the ball of the foot, the upper surface of said sole containing a rim around the periphery thereof thereby forming an upper surface receptacle adapted to receive a shoe upper therein.

2. A flexible orthopedic sole according to claim 1 wherein the medial wedge is contiguous with the sole and is highest under the heel on the medial side and terminates just forward of the navicular bone.

3. A flexible orthopedic sole according to claim 2 wherein the medial wedge is about 1/8 of an inch thick on the medial side of the heel and gradually lessens in with, both laterally and forwardly in the plantar arch area of the sole.

4. A flexible orthopedic sole according to claim 3 wherein the filled in and upwardly curving portion in the area of the plantar arch is adapted to fit both under and alongside said arch.

5. An orthopedic shoe comprising: surface in the heel portion thereof which gradually slopes laterally and forwardly to become integral with the normal sole surface, said sole being filled in and curving upwardly in the area of the plantar arch, terminating such that the medial side of the sole forms essentially a straight line extending from the heel of the sole to the portion of the sole adapted to accommodate the medial side of the ball of the foot, the upper surface of said sole containing a rim around the periphery thereof thereby forming an upper surface receptacle into which is adhesively secured a shoe upper.

6. An orthopedic shoe according to claim 5 wherein the filled in and upwardly curving portion of the sole in the area of the plantar arch is adhesively secured to said shoe upper both under and alongside said arch.

7. An orthopedic shoe according to claim 6 wherein the medial wedge is contiguous with the sole and is highest under the heel on the medial side and terminates just forward of the navicular bone.

8. An orthopedic shoe according to claim 7 wherein the upper is constructed of leather.

9. An orthopedic shoe according to claim 7 wherein the upper is constructed of a woven fabric.
#### In the Matter of Isaiah M., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. Antoya M., Appellant; Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent.

[946 NYS2d 856]

*517Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Jane Pearl, J.), entered on or about October 27, 2009, which, upon a fact-finding determination of neglect, placed the subject child with petitioner until completion of the next permanency hearing, unanimously affirmed insofar as it brings up for review the fact-finding determination, and the appeal therefrom otherwise dismissed as moot, without costs. Appeal from fact-finding order, same court and Judge, entered on or about August 24, 2009, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as superseded by the appeal from the order of disposition.

Contrary to appellant’s contention, “[a] single incident ‘where the parent’s judgment was strongly impaired and the child exposed to a risk of substantial harm’ can sustain a finding of neglect” (Ma*tter of Kayla W.,*47 AD3d 571, 572 [2008], quoting *Matter of Pedro C. [Josephine B.],*1 AD3d 267, 268 [2003]; *see Matter of Zariyasta*S., 158 AD2d 45 [1990]). Appellant testified that she was in a park with her son when she began to experience auditory hallucinations that were telling her that a demon wanted her to harm her son. After appellant stopped a passerby for help, she was taken to a hospital where she signed a temporary release allowing the Administration for Children’s Services to take the child into its custody. Appellant, whose medical records show she has experienced delusions of demons since her childhood, was thereafter involuntarily committed for a month, during which time she continued to be extremely delusional and psychotic with bizarre behavior, and lacked insight into her mental illness.

The court’s finding of neglect was supported by a preponderance of evidence that appellant’s judgment was strongly impaired and that her lack of judgment exposed the child to a substantial risk of harm to his physical, mental, and emotional health *(see Matter of Noah Jeremiah J. [Kimberly J.],*81 AD3d 37, 50 [2010]; *Matter of Zariyasta S.,*158 AD2d at 48; *Matter of Jesse DD.,*223 AD2d 929, 930-931 [1996], *lv denied*88 NY2d 803 [1996]; *see also*Family Ct Act § 1046 [b] [i]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Moskowitz, Renwick and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.
EXHIBIT 21.1 - SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY                 **State or Jurisdiction**  **% of Voting Securities** **Under the Law of****Name** **Owned** **Which Organized**Subsidiaries of National Processing, Inc.           National Processing Company, LLC.   100    Ohio  NPC International S.A. de C.V.  99.6    Mexico  Caribbean Data Services, Ltd.  100    Delaware  JBH Travel Audit Inc.  100    Colorado  National Processing Services, Incorporated  100    Ohio  NPC Alliance, Inc.  100    Delaware  ABN AMRO Merchant Services, LLC  70    Delaware  Best Payment Solutions, Inc.  100    Illinois
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Post-Effective Amendment No. 2
to Registration Statement No. 333-12619 on Form S-3 (formerly Form S-1),
Registration Statement No. 333-11142 (formerly No. 333-88927) on Form S-3,
Registration Statement No. 333-62539 on Form S-8 and Amendment No. 1 to
Registration Statement No. 333-79521 on Form S-4 of Adelphia Business Solutions,
Inc. of our report dated March 1, 2000, appearing in this Form 10-K of Adelphia
Business Solutions, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1999.



/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania


March 29, 2000