alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COLORADO RIVER AT TAYLOR FERRYLatitude: 33.434Longitude: -114.626Elevation: 236

Colorado River at Taylor Ferry

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Gutz Peak Site Page...



Gutz Peak

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Gardner Peak Site Page...



Gardner Peak

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Rainbow Canyon Site Page...



Rainbow Canyon

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Bristlecone Trail Site Page...



Bristlecone Trail

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Lee Canyon Site Page...



Lee Canyon

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Fort Valley Site Page...



Fort Valley

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Mormon Mtn Summit Site Page...



Mormon Mtn Summit

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Nutrioso Site Page...



Nutrioso

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Chalender Site Page...



Chalender

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Baker Butte Smt Site Page...



Baker Butte Smt

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Corduroy Flat Site Page...



Corduroy Flat

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Defiance Mines Site Page...



Defiance Mines

Courtesy NRCS - Go to White River Nv Site Page...



White River Nv

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Suu Ranch Site Page...



Suu Ranch

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Kyle Canyon Site Page...



Kyle Canyon

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Hayford Peak Site Page...



Hayford Peak

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Pine Nut Site Page...



Pine Nut

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Sand Hollow Site Page...



Sand Hollow

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Cave Valley Site Page...



Cave Valley

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Vermillion Site Page...



Vermillion

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Baker Butte Site Page...



Baker Butte

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Baldy Site Page...



Baldy

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Harris Flat Site Page...



Harris Flat

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Heber Site Page...



Heber

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Kolob Site Page...



Kolob

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Little Grassy Site Page...



Little Grassy

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Long Flat Site Page...



Long Flat

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Long Valley Jct Site Page...



Long Valley Jct

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Maverick Fork Site Page...



Maverick Fork

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Midway Valley Site Page...



Midway Valley

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Mormon Mountain Site Page...



Mormon Mountain

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Promontory Site Page...



Promontory

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Ward Mountain Site Page...



Ward Mountain

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Webster Flat Site Page...



Webster Flat

Courtesy NRCS - Go to White Horse Lake Site Page...



White Horse Lake

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Snowslide Canyon Site Page...



Snowslide Canyon
Listen

# Commission Business Meeting

In accordance with the Government in Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), the Commission on Civil Rights is holding a meeting to discuss the Commission’s business for the month. This business meeting is open to the public. Computer assisted real-time transcription (CART) will be provided. The web link to access CART (in English) on Friday, February 23, 2024, is https://www.streamtext.net/player?event=USCCR. Please note that CART is text-only translation that occurs in real time during the meeting and is not an exact transcript.

Friday, February 23, 2024 - 10:00 AM

Notice and Agenda

Transcript (Unedited) 

North Dakota

Pennsylvania

Rhode Island

-  Event Calendar 
-  Public Briefings 
-  Commission Business Meetings 
-  Advisory Committees Meetings 
-  Archives
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 25, 2010

p0517 

# Order

May 25, 2010

140271

LUCKY 7 DEVELOPMENT L.L.C. and GRANDE POINTE DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C., Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 140271 COA: 293462 St Clair CC: 08-000717-AA CLAY TOWNSHIP, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 16, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-14-00335-CR & 01-14-00336-CR

Style: Damion Gentry v. The State of Texas

Date motion filed*: June 9, 2015

Type of motion: Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief on the Merits

Party filing motion: Appellee

Document to be filed: Appellee’s Brief

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: March 11, 2015

Number of extensions granted: 1 Current Due Date: June 10, 2015

Date Requested: July 10, 2015

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: July 10, 2015

 No further extensions of time will be granted.

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

Because appellee’s counsel states that this motion is unopposed, that she has been busy 

filing several other briefs but will make this brief a priority, and because this Court 

granted appellant two extensions to file his brief, this second extension is granted, but

no further extensions will be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(d). If appellee’s brief

is not filed by July 10, 2015, these cases may be set for submission on appellant’s brief

only. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.9(a).

Judge’s signature: _/s/ Laura Carter Higley

  

Date: June 16, 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001018748
<NAME> VIRGINIA GOLF COUNTRY CLUB, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           4,498
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  336,446
<ALLOWANCES>                                    30,550
<INVENTORY>                                     70,275
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               286,497
<PP&E>                                       9,647,678
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,219,235
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,956,449
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          265,027
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,558,473
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,956,449
<SALES>                                        702,687
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,219,781
<CGS>                                          297,420
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,774,350
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                13,782
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,501
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                438,930
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            438,930
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   438,930
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Listen

# 2015 FOIA Annual Report

June 13, 2016

Annual Report

Annual Report (XML)

Chief FOIA Officer Report

-  All Reports 
-  Annual Statutory Enforcement 
-  Briefing Reports 
-  Advisory Committees Reports 
-  Budget and Performance 
-  FOIA Reports 
-  Data Inventory Program 
-  Civil Rights Complaints 
-  Historical Publications 
-  Archives
Exhibit 32

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany
the foregoing Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed filed pursuant to any provision of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or any other securities law.

Each of the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Broadway Financial
Corporation at the dates and for the periods indicated.



|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  |                                       
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------ |  | --------------------------------------
|                        |  |  | 
|Date: November 14, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Paul C. Hudson
|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  | Paul C. Hudson Chief Executive
Officer

|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  |                                       
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------ |  | --------------------------------------
|                        |  |  | 
|Date: November 14, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Samuel Sarpong
|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  | Samuel Sarpong Chief Financial
Officer
Listen

# Videos

Please note that the videos below use auto generated closed captioning technology.

Review the YouTube Terms of Service and the Google Privacy Policy.

----

              - October 17, 2014USCCR: Stand Your Ground Briefing Orlando, FL Oct 17, 2014 Part 1 

-    First  
-    Previous  
-   ...  
-  6 
-  7 
-  8 
-  9 
-  10
Document

Exhibit 4.1


slide1
NUMBER: C- SHARES: SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS CUSIP 63909J108 NAUTILUS BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE COMMON STOCK This Certifies that is the owner of FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OF THE PAR VALUE OF $0.0001 EACH OF NAUTILUS BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. (THE "COMPANY") transferable on the books of the Company in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed. This certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar. Transfer Agent _________________, Nautilus Biotechnology, Inc. _________________, Nautilus Biotechnology, Inc. NAUTILUS BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. The Company will furnish without charge to each shareholder who so requests the powers, designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights of each class of shares or series thereof of the Company and the qualifications, limitations, or restrictions of such preferences and/or rights. This certificate and the shares represented thereby are issued and shall be held subject to all the provisions of the Company’s certificate of incorporation and all amendments thereto and resolutions of the Board of Directors providing for the issue of securities (copies of which may be obtained from the secretary of the Company), to all of which the holder of this certificate by acceptance hereof assents. The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations:












slide2
TEN COM —as tenants in common UNIF GIFT MIN ACT— Custodian TEN ENT —as tenants by the entireties (Cust) (Minor) JT TEN —as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act (State) Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. For value received, hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto (PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER(S) OF ASSIGNEE(S)) (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES), INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE(S)) Shares of the capital stock represented by the Certificate, and hereby irrevocably constitutes and appoints Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Company with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE(S) TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER. Signature(s) Guaranteed: By THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM, PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15).
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2112 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2112

   To direct the United States Postal Service to designate a single, 
           unique ZIP Code for North Plainfield, New Jersey.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 29, 2015

  Mr. Lance introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To direct the United States Postal Service to designate a single, 
           unique ZIP Code for North Plainfield, New Jersey.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SINGLE, UNIQUE ZIP CODE FOR NORTH PLAINFIELD, NEW JERSEY.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 
section, the United States Postal Service shall designate a single, 
unique ZIP Code applicable to the area encompassing only North 
Plainfield, New Jersey.
                                 <all>
```
Skip to main content

Privacy Policy•Site map

**Updated Scheduled Matters**

Beginning Tuesday, February 20, 2024, the court's daily schedule will be available through an automated link.

Howard T. Markey National Courts Building • 717 Madison Place, NW, Washington, DC 20439 • 202-357-6400
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v *836Herbert Reddy, Appellant.

The evidence presented to the hearing court supports its conclusion that the identification procedures conducted by the police were not so suggestive as to warrant suppression of the complainant’s identification testimony at trial. We are unpersuaded by the defendant’s contention that the lineup was tainted merely because a police officer, approximately two months earlier, had told the complainant that it would probably be necessary for him to view a lineup of the persons whose photographs he selected as having been two of the three perpetrators of the robbery *(see, People v Rodriguez,*64 NY2d 738, 741; *People v Jerome,*111 AD2d 874). There is also no merit to the claim that the complainant was improperly advised of the fact that he selected the same person in the lineup whose photograph he had previously chosen, since the record clearly establishes that this information was imparted to the complainant only *after*he viewed the lineup and made the identification.

Although the trial court erroneously ruled that defense counsel could not argue to the jury during her summation that the lineup was suggestive, we find that under the circumstances at bar, the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt *(see, People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230; *cf. People v Ruffino,*110 AD2d 198).

Since the defendant failed to object to the allegedly improper remark made by the prosecutor during his summation concerning defendant’s prior arrest, the issue has not been preserved for our review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Santiago,*52 NY2d 865; *People v Baldo,*107 AD2d 751), and, in any event, the defendant was not deprived of a fair trial *(see, People v Roopchand,*107 AD2d 35, *affd*65 NY2d 837; *People v Rivera,*106 AD2d 590). Mangano, J. P., Weinstein, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**








**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**





I,
      Michael Lewis, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
      of
      eLinear, Inc. on Form 10-QSB/A (Second Amendment) for the quarterly period
      ended
      March 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
      Form 10-QSB/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition
      and results of operations of eLinear, Inc.





Date:
      April 3, 2006


By: /s/
      Michael Lewis


Michael
      Lewis


Chief
      Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6327

STEVEN FAISON EL, Beneficiary Over: Steven Devaughn Faison Trust,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

US DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, 

at Statesville. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (5:17-cv-00205-FDW)

Submitted: October 23, 2018 Decided: October 25, 2018

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven Faison El, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Steven Faison El appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his civil 

complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we 

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Faison El v. U.S. Dep’t of Treasury, 

No. 5:17-cv-00205-FDW (W.D.N.C. Mar. 21, 2018). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richard Wilson, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (King, J.), rendered May 14, 1985, convicting him of rape in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mangano, J. P., Brown, Lawrence, Weinstein and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
#### ROST, Respondent, v. BROOKLYN HEIGHTS R. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

December 1, 1896.)

Action by Ernst Bost against the Brooklyn Heights Bailroad Company.

No opinion. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
# C_2021130EN.01000301.xml

| 14.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 130/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 130/3

---

Special Report 5/2021

Infrastructure for charging electric vehicles: more charging stations but uneven deployment makes travel across the EU complicated

(2021/C 130/03)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report 05/2021 ‘Infrastructure for charging electric vehicles: more charging stations but uneven deployment makes travel across the EU complicated’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu

---
EXHIBIT 1.1



Notice of Articles



CERTIFIED COPY

Of a Document filed with the Province of

BUSINESS CORPORATIONS ACT                                                                    British Columbia Registrar of Companies

/s/ J S Powell

J S Powell

November 15, 2004





|This Notice of Articles was issued by the Registrar on: November 15, 2004 09:59 AM Pacific Time
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|*Incorporation Number:***BC0201003**                                                           
|                                                                                               
|Recognition Date: Incorporated on December 4, 1979                                             



NOTICE OF ARTICLES



Name of Company:



CUMBERLAND RESOURCES LTD.



REGISTERED OFFICE INFORMATION



Mailing Address:

Delivery Address:

SUITE 2300 FOUR BENTALL CENTRE

SUITE 2300 FOUR BENTALL CENTRE

1055 DUNSMUIR ST

1055 DUNSMUIR ST

PO BOX 49122

PO BOX 49122

VANCOUVER BC V7X 1J1

VANCOUVER BC V7X 1J1







RECORDS OFFICE INFORMATION



Mailing Address:

Delivery Address:

SUITE 2300 FOUR BENTALL CENTRE

SUITE 2300 FOUR BENTALL CENTRE

1055 DUNSMUIR ST

1055 DUNSMUIR ST

PO BOX 49122

PO BOX 49122

VANCOUVER BC V7X 1J1

VANCOUVER BC V7X 1J1























DIRECTORS INFORMATION





Last Name, First Name Middle Name:

SEGSWORTH, WALTER







Last Name, First Name Middle Name:

DICKSON, GLEN D.







Last Name, First Name Middle Name:

CURTIS, KERRY M.







Last Name, First Name Middle Name:

COLTERJOHN, RICHARD







Last Name, First Name Middle Name:

ARONOWICZ, ABRAHAM I.







Last Name, First Name Middle Name:

KENYON, MICHAEL







Last Name, First Name Middle Name:

RUBENSTEIN, JONATHAN A.







AUTHORIZED SHARE STRUCTURE

1. No Maximum

Common Shares

Without Par Value

Without Special Rights or Restrictions attached
#### Jeffrey Allen JACOBS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Don WOOD, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 06-7624.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 31, 2007.

Decided: June 4, 2007.

Bruce Tracy Cunningham, Jr., Law Office of Bruce T. Cunningham, Jr., Southern Pines, North Carolina, for Appellant. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

*265Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey Allen Jacobs seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certifícate of appeal-ability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jacobs has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*