alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 174 (Monday, September 13, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50951-50952]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19683]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Foreign Assets Control


Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions

AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets 
Control (OFAC) is publishing the names of one or more persons that have 
been placed on OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked 
Persons List (SDN List) based on OFAC's determination that one or more 
applicable legal criteria were satisfied. All property and interests in 
property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of these persons are blocked, and 
U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions 
with them.

DATES: See Supplementary Information section for effective date(s).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  OFAC: Andrea M. Gacki, Director, 
tel.: 202-622-2480; Associate Director for Global Targeting, tel.: 202-
622-2420; Assistant Director for Licensing, tel.: 202-622-2480; 
Assistant Director for Regulatory Affairs, tel.: 202-622-4855; or the 
Assistant Director for Sanctions Compliance & Evaluation, tel.: 202-
622-2490.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Electronic Availability

    The Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List and 
additional information concerning OFAC sanctions programs are available 
on OFAC's website (www.treasury.gov/ofac).

Notice of OFAC Actions

    On September 3, 2021, OFAC determined that the property and 
interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of the following 
persons are blocked under the relevant sanctions authorities listed 
below.

[[Page 50952]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN13SE21.000


    Dated: September 3, 2021.
Bradley T. Smith,
Acting Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control, U.S. Department of 
the Treasury.
[FR Doc. 2021-19683 Filed 9-10-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P
# C_2021054EN.01000201.xml

| 16.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 54/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 54/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9604 — NENT/Telenor/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 54/02)

On 30 April 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9604. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9604. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATION*

CERTIFICATION*

I, A. Stone Douglass, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report Form 10-K of Steakhouse Partners, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report; and

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's forth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting and;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Dated: August 16, 2004



                            BY:  /S/ A. Stone Douglass
                            --------------------------
                            A. Stone Douglass
                            President, Chief Executive Officer & Director
                            (Serving as principal executive officer)
Aspinall Operations Meet

January 21, 2016
OPERATIONS

PAST AND PRESENT
0

500

1000150020002500300035004000

9/3 9/18 10/3 10/18 11/2 11/17 12/2 12/17 1/1 1/16

Average Daily Flow (cfs)

September 2015 - January 2016

BM Inflow Crystal Release Black Canyon BM Conte
0

500

10001500200025003000

Flow (cfs)

Gunnison River Flows

Crystal Dam Gunnison R - Black Canyon North Fork @ Confluence Gunniso

Baseflow Target

SNOW CONDITIONS






Gunnison River Basin - Snow Represented in the Hydrologic Model o

Butte

Schofield

Slumgullion

U

Wager Gulch

Cochetopa

50%

60%70%80%90%

100%110%120%130%140%150%

Oct-1 Nov-1 Dec-1 Jan-1 Feb-1 Mar-1 Apr-1 

Upper Gunnison Basin SWE % of Average Daily

(Scaled to % of Avg Annual Peak)

Butte Schofield Porphyry Slumgullion Park 
FORECASTS AND

FUTURE OPERATIONS
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 120% 

Percent of 1981-2010 Average

Forecasted April-July Runoff

As of January 1st

Gunnison River - near Grand Jct 1,400,000

Ridgway Reservoir Inflow 100,000

North Fork Gunnison River - near Somerset 285,000

Paonia Reservoir Inflow (Mar-Jun) 92,000

Lake Fork Gunnison River - at Gateview 127,000

Tomichi Creek - at Gunnison 75,000

Blue Mesa Reservoir Inflow 590,000

Gunnison River - near Gunnison 305,000

East River - at Almont 145,000

Taylor Park Reservoir Inflow 86,000
CBRFC Hydrologic Model – Daily Forecast Evolution Plot – Blue M

Official Forecast (50% exceedance)

Jan

1 forecast: 610 KAF (90% of avera

Jan 19 forecast: 590 KAF (87% of aver
Year Type

Blue Mesa 

Forecasted 

Desired Peak at 

Whitewater

Duration of Half Bank 

(8,070 cfs)

Duration o

(up to 1

April-July Inflow

Af cfs Days D

DRY < 381,000 900 0 

MOD DRY 381,000 to 516,000 2,600 to 8,070 0 

AVG DRY 516,001 to 709,000 8,070 10 

AVG WET 709,001 to 831,000 8,070 to 14,350 20 

MOD WET 831,001 to 1,123,000 14,350 40 

WET >1,123,000 14,350 60 

Spring Peak & Duration TargetsBased on Hydrologic Year Type

Mid-Jan590,000
4340 cfs

Jan 15 Forecast

590 KAF

Shoulder Flo

May 1 – July 

381 cfs

0

100020003000400050006000700080009000

1000011000

5/1 5/6 5/11 5/16 5/21 5/26 5/31 6/5 6/10 6/15 6/20 6/25 6/30 

Flow (cfs)

Gunnison River Flows

Black Canyon Delta Whitewater North Fork

BC pWW Days Days 
Baseflow Targets
100

200300400500600700800

Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Au

1000 Acre-feet

Blue Mesa Content

End of Month

January Forecast = 590,000 AF

Fill to 811 Ka

Current = 602 Kaf
0

500

1000150020002500

Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Au

Flow (cfs)

Gunnison River - Black Canyon

Monthly Average Flow
EL NINO
2015/2016 El Niño is among the 3 strongest on record dating back 

El Niño Event
Does Blue Mesa April-July Inflow correlate with El Nino 
1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 

Probability of Exceedence

Distribution of Gunnison River Natural Flows

April-July Runoff Volume

El Nino Neutral La Nina
|   | 1. | The      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));      and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |    /s/  Raymond      R. Brandstrom |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Raymond      R. Brandstrom                                  |
|   | Chief      Financial Officer                                |
|   | November      10, 2008                                      |
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2021333EN.01000701.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 19.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 333/7 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10381 — One Rock Capital/The Eastman Tire Additives business of Eastman Chemical Company)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 333/05)

1.

On 10 August 2021, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2021333EN.01000701-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | One Rock Capital Partners, LLC, (‘ORC’, USA), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Eastman Tire Additives business (‘ETA’, Switzerland). |

ORC acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of ETA.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for ORC: private equity investment in a variety of sectors and with focus on control-stake equity investments in North American middle-market companies; |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for ETA: development, manufacture and sales of tire additives used in tire manufacturing. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2021333EN.01000701-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10381 — One Rock Capital/The Eastman Tire Additives business of Eastman Chemical Company

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2021333EN.01000701-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2021333EN.01000701-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
# C_2021245EN.01000601.xml

| 24.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10329 — Fairfax/Eurolife)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 245/06)

On 18. June 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10329. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10329. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2021039EN.01002301.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 4.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 39/23 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10125 — GBL/Canyon)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 39/08)

1.

On 27 January 2021, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2021039EN.01002301-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Groupe Bruxelles Lambert SA (‘GBL’, Belgium), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Canyon Bicycles GmbH (‘Canyon’, Germany). |

GBL acquire(s) within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Canyon.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for GBL: investing in global companies operating in various sectors, mainly in Europe, as an investment holding company, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for Canyon: developing, producing and distributing mountain bikes, road bikes, triathlon bikes, urban bikes and commuter bikes as well as related components/parts, bike accessories and apparel. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2021039EN.01002301-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

Case M.10125 — GBL/Canyon

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2021039EN.01002301-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2021039EN.01002301-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
#### Eklecco Newco, LLC, Appellant, v Q of Palisades, LLC, Doing Business as Qdoba Mexican Grill, et al., Respondents.

(Appeal No. 1.)

[945 NYS2d 587]

Motion to modify memorandum and order denied. Present — Centra, J.P., Fahey, Bindley, Sconiers and Martoche, JJ.
#### Carol Braten, Respondent, v Milton Braten, Appellant.

Submitted June 4, 2007;

decided June 12, 2007

Appeal, insofar as taken from the Appellate Division order that denied the motion to recall and vacate a prior order of that Court, or in the alternative, for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; appeal, insofar as taken from the Appellate Division order that dismissed the appeal taken to that Court from the judgment of divorce, dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua *1018sponte, upon the ground that as to that order no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.
#### PARMLEE, Respondent, v. ASSOCIATED PHYSICIANS & SURGEONS, Appellant.

(Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.

May 17, 1894.)

Action by Samuel B. Parmlee against the Associated Physicians & Surgeons.

Argued before BOOKSTAVER, BISCHOEP, and PRYOR, JJ

C. De Hart Brower, for appellant.

D. B. Simpson, for respondent.

No opinion. Motion for reargument granted, provided the case is argued at the additional general term in June.
Stability Letters and Uninspected Vessels operating as Small Passenger Vessels

 

 Written by Genelle Vachon

In a recent Civil Penalty case, a vessel owner was charged with operating two vessels in 

commercial service as small passenger vessels without a valid COI (46 CFR 176.100(a)), 

for operating without a stability letter (46 CFR 170.120) and for failure of a marine 

employer to comply with the requirements concerning chemical testing of personnel (46 

CFR 16.201). The discussion in this article is limited to the stability letter violation.

On appeal, the Appellate Authority dismissed the violation for operating without a 

stability letter, finding that the requirement to have a stability letter before entering 

commercial service applies to inspected vessels. Because neither of the vessels were 

inspected at the time of the alleged violations, nor required to have a stability letter under 

either Subchapter C or E, the requirement to have a stability letter did not apply to them 

based on the plain language of 46 CFR 170.001. 

The requirement to have a stability letter is set forth in Subchapter S, Part 170 – Stability 

Requirements for All Inspected Vessels. In 46 CFR 170.001 (Applicability), it says in 

pertinent part:

“a) This subchapter applies to each vessel that is—

(1) Contracted for on or after March 11, 1996, except where specifically stated 

otherwise; and

(2) Either—

(i) Inspected under another subchapter of this chapter, or is a foreign vessel that 

must comply with the requirements in subchapter O of this chapter; or

(ii) Required by either subchapter C or subchapter E of this chapter to meet 

applicable requirements contained in this subchapter.”

Conclusion: In light of the wording in 46 CFR 170.001 and the recent Appeal Decision, 

Coast Guard units should not charge the operator of an uninspected vessel for not having 

a stability letter even when the uninspected vessel is operating as a vessel that is subject

to inspection, i.e. a “T” boat. The wording in 46 CFR 170.001 is very clear that 

Subchapter S only applies to inspected vessels (or those vessels required in either 

Subchapter C or E to meet Subchapter S requirements). If, however, 46 CFR 170.001 

was written to say: “This subchapter applies to each vessel that is ... subject to 

inspection under another subchapter of this chapter....” then the requirement to have a 

stability letter would arguably apply to an uninspected vessel that is operating as a Small 

Passenger Vessel.
#### VAN WERT, Appellant, v. ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INS. CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

January 12, 1897.)

Action by Emma Van Wert against the St. Paul Eire & Marine Insurance Company.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except PUTNAM, J., dissenting. See 40 N. Y. Supp. 463.