alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021065EN.01001401.xml

| 25.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/14

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10118 — Investindustrial/Guala Closures)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 65/07)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Special Packaging Solutions Investment S.à.r.l. (‘SPSI’, Luxembourg), controlled by Investindustrial S.A. (‘Investindustrial’, Luxembourg), |
| --- | --- |

—

Special Packaging Solutions Investment S.à.r.l. (‘SPSI’, Luxembourg), controlled by Investindustrial S.A. (‘Investindustrial’, Luxembourg),

| — | Guala Closure S.p.A. (‘Guala’, Italy). |
| --- | --- |

—

Guala Closure S.p.A. (‘Guala’, Italy).

SPSI acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control over Guala.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares and a public bid announced on 8 December 2020.

2.

| — | for Investindustrial: group of independently managed investment, holding and financial advisory companies focused on investments in medium-sized companies based in Europe. Investindustrial’s portfolio focuses on three main investment areas: consumer and leisure; healthcare and services; and industrial manufacturing, |
| --- | --- |

—

for Investindustrial: group of independently managed investment, holding and financial advisory companies focused on investments in medium-sized companies based in Europe. Investindustrial’s portfolio focuses on three main investment areas: consumer and leisure; healthcare and services; and industrial manufacturing,

| — | for Guala: production of non-refillable and aluminium closures for spirits, wine, oil and vinegar, water, and beverages. |
| --- | --- |

—

for Guala: production of non-refillable and aluminium closures for spirits, wine, oil and vinegar, water, and beverages.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10118 — Investindustrial/Guala Closures

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**PERICOM SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with this quarterly report of Pericom Semiconductor Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003(the “Report”), I, Alex C. Hui, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)    the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

 

(2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.
#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Flow                    
csv

      Gage Height                    
csv

#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Flow                    
json

      Gage Height                    
json
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           3,927
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  117,376
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     33,501
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               312,525
<PP&E>                                         170,972
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,854
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 591,780
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          177,611
<BONDS>                                        215,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           288
<OTHER-SE>                                     119,910
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   591,780
<SALES>                                        998,149
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               998,149
<CGS>                                          912,131
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   66,287
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (719)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,135
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,315
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,017)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,332
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,332
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.46


</TABLE>
SAN JUAN RIVER NEAR ARCHULETA,NMLatitude: 36.801Longitude: -107.698Elevation: 5671

SAN JUAN RIVER NEAR ARCHULETA,NM

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Weminuche Creek Site Page...



Weminuche Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Beartown Site Page...



Beartown

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Middle Creek Site Page...



Middle Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Stump Lakes Site Page...



Stump Lakes

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Upper Rio Grande Site Page...



Upper Rio Grande

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Upper San Juan Site Page...



Upper San Juan

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Vallecito Site Page...



Vallecito

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Wolf Creek Summit Site Page...



Wolf Creek Summit
# C_2021129EN.01000701.xml

| 13.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10193 — OTPP/IFM/Enwave Energy Canada)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 129/03)

On 7 April 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10193. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10193. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion *

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-40427

Summary Calendar

WAYNE ERNEST BARKER

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

ANN SWEETEN; NURSE PRACTITIONER FUENTES; JULIE SWEETEN

Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:05-CV-87

Before SMITH, STEWART and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. 

 

PER CURIAM:*

Wayne Ernest Barker, Texas prisoner # 900987, appeals the district

court’s dismissal of his pro se and in forma pauperis civil rights complaint

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.

Barker also requests permission to file a supplemental appellate brief. The

motion to file a supplemental brief is denied.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 24, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-40427

2

Barker admittedly made no attempt to pursue prison administrative

remedies, but he argues that the dismissal of his complaint was error because

the Texas Department of Criminal Justice grievance procedures were not

available to him. He contends that he should be excused from the § 1997e

exhaustion requirement due to his physical and mental problems, and he argues

that the district court’s dismissal of his complaint violates FED. R. APP. P. 28.

We find no error in the district court’s dismissal of the complaint. See Woodford

v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 88-89 (2006); Booth v. Churner, 532 U.S. 731, 739-41 & n.6

(2001).

MOTION TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF DENIED; AFFIRMED.
# C_2021291EN.01000301.xml

| 21.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 291/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 291/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10335 — PAI/Gapave/Apave)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 291/03)

On 16 July 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10335. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10335. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
EXHIBIT 23





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We consent to the incorporation by reference into the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-55180, 333-63268, 333-68718, 333-81290, 333-104402, 333-108529, 333-125194, 333-135553,  333-149067, 333-155865, and 333-160003) of  Paid, Inc. of our report dated March 12, 2010, on our audit of the financial statements of Paid, Inc., which appears in the December 31, 2009 annual report on Form 10-K of Paid, Inc.





/s/ CCR LLP


Westborough, Massachusetts


March 12, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS RESTATED SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF JUNE 30, 1997 AND FOR THE THREE AND
SIX MONTH PERIODS THEN ENDED
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       5,992,424
<SECURITIES>                                19,055,858
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,511,399
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    923,981
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            28,535,264
<PP&E>                                       2,820,963
<DEPRECIATION>                                 599,298
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,748,621
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,228,527
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,554
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,128,772
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,748,621   
<SALES>                                      3,889,715
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,440,109
<CGS>                                        1,816,684
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,902,560
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (786,732)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,492,403)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    23,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,515,403)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,515,403)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.26)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2021003EN.01000201.xml

| 6.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 3/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 3/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10071 — De Agostini Group/Foodiverse/Alnut)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 3/02)

On 16 December 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M10071. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M10071. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
EXHIBIT
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      OF THE


CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      Tannya
      L Irizarry, Chief Financial Officer of GeneThera, Inc. (the “Company”), do
      hereby that to the best of my knowledge and belief that:





(1)
      The
      Company’s annual report on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2006
      (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      May
      2, 2007





By:
      /s/
      Tannya L Irizarry


-
      ---------------------------


Tannya
      L
      Irizarry


Chief
      Financial Officer (Interim)
BLUE MESA RESERVOIRLatitude: 38.453Longitude: -107.337Elevation: 7304

BLUE MESA RESERVOIR

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Cochetopa Pass Site Page...



Cochetopa Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Sargents Mesa Site Page...



Sargents Mesa

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Upper Taylor Site Page...



Upper Taylor

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Wager Gulch Site Page...



Wager Gulch

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Butte Site Page...



Butte

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Park Cone Site Page...



Park Cone

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Porphyry Creek Site Page...



Porphyry Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Schofield Pass Site Page...



Schofield Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Slumgullion Site Page...



Slumgullion
# C_2021321EN.01000501.xml

| 10.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 321/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 321/5

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10216 — DFDS/HSF Logistics Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 321/04)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | DFDS A/S (‘DFDS’, Denmark); |
| --- | --- |

—

DFDS A/S (‘DFDS’, Denmark);

| — | HSF Distri Holding B.V., HSF Expeditie Holding B.V., and Frekrenij B.V. (together with their respective subsidiaries, the ‘HSF Logistics Group’, the Netherlands). |
| --- | --- |

—

HSF Distri Holding B.V., HSF Expeditie Holding B.V., and Frekrenij B.V. (together with their respective subsidiaries, the ‘HSF Logistics Group’, the Netherlands).

DFDS acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of HSF Logistics Group.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | for DFDS: operates a sea transport network around Europe, providing ferry shipping services, transport and logistics solutions. |
| --- | --- |

—

for DFDS: operates a sea transport network around Europe, providing ferry shipping services, transport and logistics solutions.

| — | for HSF Logistics Group: provides logistics services, including refrigerated transport (fresh and frozen food), cold storage and cross-docking, re-usable packaging and packaging contract cleaning. |
| --- | --- |

—

for HSF Logistics Group: provides logistics services, including refrigerated transport (fresh and frozen food), cold storage and cross-docking, re-usable packaging and packaging contract cleaning.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10216 — DFDS/HSF Logistics Group

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
```
      [NOT FOR PUBLICATION--NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]
                 United States Court of Appeals
                     For the First Circuit





No. 98-1165

                          UNITED STATES,

                            Appellee,

                                v.

                      LUIS LUHRING-BADILLO,

                      Plaintiff, Appellant.



           APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                 FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

         [Hon. Daniel R. Dom¡nguez, U.S. District Judge]



                              Before

                     Torruella, Chief Judge,
               Selya and Boudin, Circuit Judges.
                                
                                


     Luis Rafael Rivera on brief for appellant.
     Guillermo Gil, United States Attorney, Camille Velez-Rive,
Assistant United States Attorney, and Jose A. Quiles-Espinosa,
Senior Litigation Counsel, on brief for appellee.






July 27, 1998


                                


                                               Per Curiam.  Upon careful review of the briefs and
    record, we are convinced that the district court understood its
    authority to depart and that it found no grounds to do so in
    this case.  In particular, upon a thorough reading of the
    sentencing proceedings as a whole, it appears that the district
    court raised sua sponte the possibility of a departure for 
    what it termed "extraordinary acceptance of responsibility,"
    and, after discussion with counsel, decided that no departure
    was warranted under either U.S.S.G. � 5K2.0 or U.S.S.G. �
    5K2.16.  See United States v. Bennett, 60 F.3d 902, 905 (1st
    Cir. 1995).  Further, we read the district court's concluding
    comments only as again rejecting the mental condition departure
    requested by defendant and as determining generally that
    defendant's case did not present any extraordinary
    circumstances warranting departure.  Such a discretionary
    determination is not subject to appellate review.  See United
    States v. Grandmaison, 77 F.3d 555, 560 (1st Cir. 1996).
              Affirmed.  See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.
```