alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021435EN.01000301.xml

| 28.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 435/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 435/3

---

Final Report of the Hearing Officer (1)

Case AT.40394 – Aspen

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 435/03)

The present report relates to a draft commitments decision pursuant to Article 9(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (2) (the ‘Draft Decision’) addressed to Aspen Pharmacare Holdings Ltd and ASPEN PHARMA IRELAND LIMITED (‘Aspen’).

On 15 May 2017, the Commission opened proceedings into Aspen’s pricing practices for certain cancer medicines with a view to adopting a decision under Chapter III of Regulation 1/2003.

On 24 November 2017, I admitted BEUC, the European Consumer Organisation, as an interested third person.

On 19 June 2020, the Commission adopted a preliminary assessment within the meaning of Article 9(1) of Regulation 1/2003, which set out the Commission’s competition concerns. This preliminary assessment was notified to Aspen on 22 June 2020. Aspen submitted a response to the Commission’s preliminary assessment on 6 July 2020.

On 9 July 2020, Aspen proposed commitments (the ‘Proposed Commitments’) in order to meet the concerns expressed in the Commission’s preliminary assessment.

On 15 July 2020, the Commission published a notice in accordance with Article 27(4) of Regulation No 1/2003, inviting comments from interested third parties on the Proposed Commitments.

On 9 December 2020, the Commission informed Aspen of the observations received.

On 28 January 2021, Aspen submitted revised commitments (the ‘Revised Commitments’).

The Draft Decision proposes that the Revised Commitments become binding upon Aspen for ten years and that there would no longer be grounds for action by the Commission in this case as regards the concerns as set out in the preliminary assessment.

Overall, I consider that the effective exercise of procedural rights has been respected in this case.

Brussels, 5 February 2021.

Wouter WILS

---

(1)  Pursuant to Articles 16 and 17 of Decision 2011/695/EU of the President of the European Commission of 13 October 2011 on the function and terms of reference of the hearing officer in certain competition proceedings (OJ L 275, 20.10.2011, p. 29) (‘Decision 2011/695/EU’).

1

(2)  Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (OJ L 1, 4.1.2003, p. 1) (‘Regulation 1/2003’).

2

---
EXHIBIT
32.2







PERICOM
SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In
connection with this quarterly report of Pericom Semiconductor Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 28, 2009 (the
“Report”), I, Angela Chen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
knowledge:




(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and




(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
and for the periods indicated.




May 6,
2009




By:
              /s/ Angela ChenAngela
      ChenChief
      Financial OfficerPericom
      Semiconductor Corporation
# L_2012086EN.01002501.xml

| 24.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 86/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 86/25

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (EC) No 596/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009 adapting a number of instruments subject to the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty to Council Decision 1999/468/EC with regard to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny — Adaptation to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny — Part Four

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 188 of 18 July 2009
  )

On pages 21 and 22, Annex, 1. Enterprise, 1.6. Directive 2001/82/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to veterinary medicinal products:

Points 1 and 2 are deleted.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,206,073
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,412,719
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (46,237)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,945,119
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,057,278
<PP&E>                                       4,257,590
<DEPRECIATION>                               (992,325)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,650,742
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,002,304
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    328,585
<COMMON>                                        33,344
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,726,171
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,299,332
<SALES>                                        999,506
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,887,127
<CGS>                                          529,909
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,519,364
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              60,612
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                100,571
<INCOME-TAX>                                    23,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             77,571
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    77,571
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 11.1 COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE
(in thousands, except per share amounts) Three Months Ended
    
    Six Months EndedJune 30
    
    June 302004
    
    2003
    
    2004
    
    2003COMPUTATION OF BASIC NET LOSS PER SHARE:Net loss
    
    $
    (15,820
    )
    
    $
    (8,792
    )
    
    $
    (34,229
    )
    
    $
    (33,713
    )Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding
    
    
    39,075
    
    
    
    32,737
    
    
    
    39,068
    
    
    
    32,659Basic net loss per share
    
    $
    (.40
    )
    
    $
    (.27
    )
    
    $
    (.88
    )
    
    $
    (1.03
    )COMPUTATION OF DILUTED NET LOSS PER SHARE:Net loss available to common stockholders
    
    $
    (15,820
    )
    
    $
    (8,792
    )
    
    $
    (34,229
    )
    
    $
    (33,713
    )Weighted-average number of shares of common stock and
common stock equivalents outstanding-Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding
    
    
    39,075
    
    
    
    32,737
    
    
    
    39,068
    
    
    
    32,659Weighted-average number of common stock
equivalents applicable to stock options and
employee stock purchase plans
    
    
    1,163
    
    
    
    866
    
    
    
    1,153
    
    
    
    480Common stock and common stock equivalents
    
    
    40,238
    
    
    
    33,603
    
    
    
    40,221
    
    
    
    33,139Diluted net loss per common stock and common stock
equivalents (a)
    
    $
    (.39
    )
    
    $
    (.26
    )
    
    $
    (.85
    )
    
    $
    (1.02
    )
  (a)
    
    This calculation is submitted in accordance with
Item 601(b)(11) of Regulation S-K although it is not
required by SFAS No. 128 because it is antidilutive.
null

499.75967
Listen

# Glenn D. Magpantay

## Commissioner

Political Affiliation: DemocratTerm Ends: Dec 2028

Glenn D. Magpantay, Esq. is a long-time civil rights attorney, professor of law and Asian American Studies, and LGBTQ rights activist. Glenn has been organizing in the community for over 30 years. He is a Soros Equality Fellow with the Open Society Foundations. 

He co-founded and served as Executive Director of the National Queer Asian Pacific Islander Alliance (NQAPIA). Before he was a nationally recognized voting rights attorney at the Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund (AALDEF). He served as a Trustee to the Boehm Foundation. Today, he is principal at Magpantay & Associates: a nonprofit consulting and legal services firm.

He is a thought-leader at the intersection of race, immigration, and queerness, regularly publishing scholarly articles, opinion-editorials, and public reports. He has given commentary to The New York Times, Washington Post, USA Today, Associated Press, MSNBC, and NBC.

He inspires new legal minds by teaching at Hunter College/ CUNY. Glenn attended SUNY at Stony Brook, and as a beneficiary of affirmative action, graduated cum laude from the New England School of Law, in Boston.

-  Our Mission 
-  Commissioners 
-  Offices and Staff 
-  Careers 
-  Acquisition Opportunities 
-  Rankin Memorial Library 
-  FAQs
Dismiss and Opinion Filed October 29, 2014 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01357-CV 

IN RE WALTER CORTEZ, Relator 

Original Proceeding from the 292nd Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. F07-30378-V 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices FitzGerald, Francis, and Brown 

Opinion by Justice Francis 

Relator filed this petition for writ of mandamus complaining of the actions of the trial 

court in dismissing or denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus without giving him an 

opportunity to amend and of the actions of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in denying his 

petition for writ of mandamus filed in that court. The intermediate courts of appeals have no 

original jurisdiction over petitions for habeas corpus relief in connection with criminal 

proceedings. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 22.221(d) (West 2004) (limiting habeas corpus 

jurisdiction of intermediate courts of appeals to civil matters); TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 

11.05 (West 2005) (granting original jurisdiction in cases seeking writs of habeas corpus in 

criminal cases to the court of criminal appeals, districts courts, and county courts). Accordingly, 

they also have no mandamus jurisdiction in matters related to petitions for writ of habeas corpus. 

“Article 11.07 contains no role for the courts of appeals; the only courts referred to are the 

convicting court and the Court of Criminal Appeals.” In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d 715, 718 (Tex. 
 –2– 

App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding). We DISMISS relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus for want of jurisdiction. 

141357F.P05 /Molly Francis/ 

MOLLY FRANCIS 

JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2288 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 585
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2288

                          [Report No. 114-313]

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 1, 2015

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

                            August 30, 2016

 Reported under authority of the order of the Senate of July 14, 2016, 
                  by Ms. Murkowski, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To remove the use restrictions on certain land transferred to 
          Rockingham County, Virginia, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF USE RESTRICTION.

    Public Law 101-479 (104 Stat. 1158) is amended--
            (1) by striking section 2(d); and
            (2) by adding the following new section at the end:

``SEC. 4. REMOVAL OF USE RESTRICTION.

    ``(a) The approximately 1-acre portion of the land referred to in 
section 3 that is used for purposes of a child care center, as 
authorized by this Act, shall not be subject to the use restriction 
imposed in the deed referred to in section 3.
    ``(b) Upon enactment of this section, the Secretary of the Interior 
shall execute an instrument to carry out subsection (a).''.
                                                       Calendar No. 585

114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 2288

                          [Report No. 114-313]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

     To remove the use restrictions on certain land transferred to 
          Rockingham County, Virginia, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            August 30, 2016

                       Reported without amendment
```
Exhibit 32.1



Dover Motorsports, Inc.

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual
Report of Dover Motorsports, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Denis
McGlynn, President and Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                             
|-----------------------------
|Dated: March 11, 2005        
|/s/ Denis McGlynn            
|Denis McGlynn                
|President and Chief Executive
|Officer and Director         



This certification
shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 10, 2022

No. 04-22-00632-CR

EX PARTE Elliot Jerzain RAMOS-ESTRADA

From the County Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2022CRB000724L1

Honorable Leticia Martinez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief is currently due on November 17, 2022. On November 9, 2022, 

appellant filed a motion requesting a 45-day extension of time to file his brief. We GRANT the

motion and ORDER appellant to file his brief by January 2, 2023. Further requests for 

extensions of time will be disfavored.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of November, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
##### 



The Registrant:
Wilsons The Leather Experts Inc. (Minnesota)
 Direct Subsidiary of Wilsons The Leather Experts Inc.Wilsons Center, Inc. (Minnesota)Direct Subsidiary of Wilsons Center, Inc.:Rosedale Wilsons, Inc. (Minnesota)Direct Subsidiary of Rosedale Wilsons, Inc.:River Hills Wilsons, Inc. (Minnesota)Direct Subsidiaries of River Hills Wilsons, Inc.:Wilsons Leather Direct Inc. (Delaware)Wilsons Leather of Alabama Inc. (Alabama)Wilsons Leather of Arkansas Inc. (Arkansas)Wilsons Leather of Connecticut Inc. (Connecticut)Wilsons Leather of Delaware Inc. (Delaware)Wilsons Leather of Florida Inc. (Florida)Wilsons Leather of Georgia Inc. (Georgia)Wilsons Leather of Indiana Inc. (Indiana)Wilsons Leather of Iowa Inc. (Iowa)Wilsons Leather of Louisiana Inc. (Louisiana)Wilsons Leather of Maryland Inc. (Maryland)Wilsons Leather of Massachusetts Inc. (Massachusetts)Wilsons Leather of Michigan Inc. (Michigan)Wilsons Leather of Mississippi Inc. Mississippi)Wilsons Leather of Missouri Inc. (Missouri)Wilsons Leather of New Jersey Inc. (New Jersey)Wilsons Leather of New York Inc. (New York)Wilsons Leather of North Carolina Inc. (North Carolina)Wilsons Leather of Ohio Inc. (Ohio)Wilsons Leather of Pennsylvania Inc. (Pennsylvania)Wilsons Leather of Rhode Island Inc. (Rhode Island)Wilsons Leather of South Carolina Inc. (South Carolina)Wilsons Leather of Tennessee Inc. (Tennessee)Wilsons Leather of Texas Inc. (Texas)Wilsons Leather of Vermont Inc. (Vermont)Wilsons Leather of Virginia Inc. (Virginia)Wilsons Leather of West Virginia Inc. (West Virginia)Wilsons Leather of Wisconsin Inc. (Wisconsin)Bermans The Leather Experts Inc. (Delaware)Wilsons Leather Holdings Inc. (Minnesota)Wilsons International Inc. (Minnesota)WWT, Inc. (Delaware)Direct Subsidiaries of Wilsons Leather Holdings Inc.:USA Wilsons Leather Holdings Inc. Yantai RO (China Representative Office)Direct Subsidiaries of Wilsons International Inc.:Wilsons Leather of Hong Kong Ltd. (Hong Kong)Direct Subsidiary of Wilsons Leather of Delaware Inc.Wilsons Leather of Airports Inc. (Delaware)Direct Subsidiaries of Wilsons Leather of Airports Inc.Chicago OHare Leather Concessions Joint Venture (Delaware)Direct Subsidiaries of WWT, Inc.Florida Luggage Corp. (Puerto Rico)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northwest Pipe Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard A. Roman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/S/ RICHARD A. ROMAN                 
|Richard A. Roman                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|November 4, 2010
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DARREN K. EDWARDS

, Appellant,

v.

GUARDIANSHIP OF CARRIE MAE HICKS

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 3283

[ October 17, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Mark A . Speiser

, Senior Judge; L.T. Case No. PRC 07

-

0005967

.

Darren K. Edwards, Fort Lauderdale, pro se.

Tieesha N. Taylor of Elderly Care Law Firm, Miami, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

D AMOORGIAN

, C IKLIN and G ERBER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**EXHIBIT 23.1****CONSENT OF GRANT THORNTON LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We have issued our report dated August 19, 2005, accompanying the financial statements and scheduleincluded in the Annual Report of ACE*COMM Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30,2005. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the RegistrationStatements of ACE*COMM’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan, Amended and Restated Omnibus Stock Plan and2001 Stock Option Plan for Directors of ACE*COMM Corporation on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-111629,333- 12107, No. 333-15237, No. 333-88077, No. 333-88079, No. 333-46938, No. 333-61570 and No. 333-103811) and Form S-3 (File No. 333-124351)./s/Grant Thornton LLPVienna, Virginia
# C_2021470EN.01000101.xml

| 22.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 470/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 470/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10482 – CVC / CARLYLE / CFGI EAGLE PARENT)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 470/01)

On 28 October 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10482. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10482. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Storage                    
csv

      Inflow                    
csv

      Total Release                    
csv

      Pool Elevation                    
csv

      Release Volume                    
csv

      Area                    
csv

      Inflow Volume                    
csv

      Delta Storage                    
csv

#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Storage                    
json

      Inflow                    
json

      Total Release                    
json

      Pool Elevation                    
json

      Release Volume                    
json

      Area                    
json

      Inflow Volume                    
json

      Delta Storage                    
json
#### John Martocci et al., Appellants, v Bowaskie Ice House, LLC, Defendant, and Daniel A. Boons, Respondent.

Submitted January 29, 2007;

decided March 22, 2007

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied *[see*7 NY3d 916].

Judge Graffeo taking no part.