alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2160 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2160

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend for one year the 
 employer wage credit for employees who are active duty members of the 
                          uniformed services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 30, 2015

 Mr. Grayson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend for one year the 
 employer wage credit for employees who are active duty members of the 
                          uniformed services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF EMPLOYER WAGE CREDIT FOR EMPLOYEES WHO ARE 
              ACTIVE DUTY MEMBERS OF THE UNIFORMED SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (f) of section 45P of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``December 31, 2014'' and 
inserting ``December 31, 2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to payments made after December 31, 2014.
                                 <all>
```
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2263 

To rename the Office of Space Commerce and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 12, 2015 

Mr. ROHRABACHER (for himself, Mr. SMITH of Texas, and Mr. BABIN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science, 

Space, and Technology 

A BILL 

To rename the Office of Space Commerce and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Office of Space Com5 merce Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RENAMING OF OFFICE OF SPACE COMMERCIALIZA7 TION. 

8 (a) CHAPTER HEADING.— 

9 (1) AMENDMENT.—The chapter heading for 

10 chapter 507 of title 51, United States Code, is 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 2263 IH

1 amended by striking ‘‘COMMERCIALIZA2 TION’’ and inserting ‘‘Commerce’’. 

3 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The item re4 lating to chapter 507 in the table chapters for title 

5 51, United States Code, is amended by striking 

6 ‘‘Commercialization’’ and inserting ‘‘Commerce’’. 

7 (b) DEFINITION OF OFFICE.— Section 50701 of title 

8 51, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘Commer9 cialization’’ and inserting ‘‘Commerce’’. 

10 (c) RENAMING.—Section 50702(a) of title 51, United 

11 States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘Commercialization’’ 

12 and inserting ‘‘Commerce’’. 

13 SEC. 3. FUNCTIONS OF THE OFFICE OF SPACE COMMERCE. 

14 Section 50702(c) of title 51, United States Code, is 

15 amended by striking ‘‘Commerce.’’ and inserting ‘‘Com16 merce, including to— 

17 ‘‘(1) foster the conditions for the economic 

18 growth and technological advancement of the United 

19 States space commerce industry; 

20 ‘‘(2) coordinate space commerce policy issues 

21 and actions within the Department of Commerce; 

22 ‘‘(3) represent the Department of Commerce in 

23 the development of United States policies and in ne24 gotiations with foreign countries to promote United 

25 States space commerce; 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•HR 2263 IH

1 ‘‘(4) promote the advancement of United States 

2 geospatial technologies related to space commerce, in 

3 cooperation with relevant interagency working 

4 groups; and 

5 ‘‘(5) provide support to Federal Government or6 ganizations working on Space-Based Positioning 

7 Navigation, and Timing policy, including the Na8 tional Coordination Office for Space-Based Position, 

9 Navigation, and Timing.’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Theodore Crutchfield, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (McMahon, J.), rendered March 22, 1984, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The record before us discloses that the sentencing court considered all pertinent information, including the arguments advanced by the defendant and his counsel, prior to imposing the sentence which the defendant now challenges. We find that the sentencing court did not abuse its discretion in *325imposing the sentence that had previously been agreed upon during the plea negotiations.

We further note that the defendant’s entry of a guilty plea precludes appellate review of the arguments raised in his *pro se*brief and that these arguments, in any event, are devoid of merit. Mangano, J. P., Weinstein, Lawrence and Hooper, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT
      12.1**




**CERTIFICATIONS**






I,
      Arnon
      Toussia-Cohen, certify that:




1.
      I have
      reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of RADCOM Ltd.;




2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for,
      the periods presented in this report;




4.
      The
      company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules
      13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:




(a)
      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the company, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;




(b)
      Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures
      and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
      this
      report based on such evaluation; and




(c)
      Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
      the
      company’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.
      The
      company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s
      auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons
      performing the equivalent functions):




(a)
      All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report
      financial information; and




(b)
      Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial
      reporting.




Date:
      March 29, 2006


*/s/
      Arnon Toussia-Cohen*


Arnon
      Toussia-Cohen


Chief
      Executive Officer


(Principal
      Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2245 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2245

  To require the Federal Trade Commission to consider including Smart 
          Grid capability on Energy Guide labels for products.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2015

     Mrs. Ellmers of North Carolina (for herself and Mr. McNerney) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Federal Trade Commission to consider including Smart 
          Grid capability on Energy Guide labels for products.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCLUSION OF SMART GRID CAPABILITY ON ENERGY GUIDE LABELS.

    Section 324(a)(2) of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 
U.S.C. 6294(a)(2)) is amended by adding the following at the end:
                    ``(J)(i) Not later than 1 year after the date of 
                enactment of this subparagraph, the Commission shall 
                initiate a rulemaking to consider making a special note 
                in a prominent manner on any Energy Guide label for any 
                product that includes Smart Grid capability that--
                            ``(I) Smart Grid capability is a feature of 
                        that product;
                            ``(II) the use and value of that feature 
                        depend on the Smart Grid capability of the 
                        utility system in which the product is 
                        installed and the active utilization of that 
                        feature by the customer; and
                            ``(III) on a utility system with Smart Grid 
                        capability, the use of the product's Smart Grid 
                        capability could reduce the customer's cost of 
                        the product's annual operation by an estimated 
                        dollar amount range representing the result of 
                        incremental energy and electricity cost savings 
                        that would result from the customer taking full 
                        advantage of such Smart Grid capability.
                    ``(ii) Not later than 3 years after the date of 
                enactment of this subparagraph, the Commission shall 
                complete the rulemaking initiated under clause (i).''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2021005EN.01002001.xml

| 7.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 5/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 5/20

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10006 - Covestro/Koninklijke DSM)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 5/18)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Covestro AG (‘Covestro’, Germany), |
| --- | --- |

—

Covestro AG (‘Covestro’, Germany),

| — | The Resins & Functional Materials businesses (‘Target’) of Koninklijke DSM N.V (‘DSM’, Netherlands). |
| --- | --- |

—

The Resins & Functional Materials businesses (‘Target’) of Koninklijke DSM N.V (‘DSM’, Netherlands).

Covestro acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the Target.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | Covestro AG focuses on the supply of high-performance polymers and components for such polymers. Covestro AG operates three segments: Polyurethanes (PUR), Polycarbonates (PCS), and Coatings, Adhesives, Specialties (CAS). |
| --- | --- |

—

Covestro AG focuses on the supply of high-performance polymers and components for such polymers. Covestro AG operates three segments: Polyurethanes (PUR), Polycarbonates (PCS), and Coatings, Adhesives, Specialties (CAS).

| — | The Target is primarily active in the supply of resins for use in coatings and the supply of glass fibre coatings. |
| --- | --- |

—

The Target is primarily active in the supply of resins for use in coatings and the supply of glass fibre coatings.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10006 - Covestro/Koninklijke DSM

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
Listen

# Maxwell Alejandro Frost

## U.S. Representative and CSSBMB Commissioner

The first member of Generation Z to be elected to Congress, Maxwell Alejandro Frost is proud to represent the people of Central Florida (FL-10) in the United States House of Representatives.

As a young Member of Congress and Afro-Latino, Congressman Frost brings a fresh, progressive perspective to an institution formerly out of reach for young, working Black and Latino Americans.

Frost was adopted at birth and raised in the very community he now represents. His mother, a Cuban-American, came to the U.S. during the freedom flights in the late 1960s and became a special needs teacher in Central Florida, inspiring his advocacy for supporting future generations through education. And his father, a full-time musician, taught Congressman Frost his love for music, gifting him his first drum set and igniting his passion for the arts.

As a former organizer, musician, and community activist, Frost was inspired to get to work at 15 years old after the tragic mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary claimed the lives of 26 innocent people. From that moment on, Frost dedicated his life to fighting against gun violence and empowering communities across Florida and the U.S. to get behind gun reform, including joining forces with those affected by the Parkland and Pulse shootings to shed light on this epidemic.

In 2016, after years of organizing and advocacy work, Frost himself became a survivor of gun violence after witnessing a shooting in downtown Orlando. The experience only further committed Frost to fight for commonsense solutions to this senseless loss of life through leadership roles at ACLU and eventually March for Our Lives, where he served as National Organizing Director.

Now, as a freshman member, Frost has been appointed to the powerful Committee on Oversight and Accountability, where he will deliver on his mission of ushering justice and transparency to Floridians while fighting against House Republicans extremist attempts to politicize the work of the committee by attacking democracy and promoting ridiculous MAGA conspiracies.

Frost will additionally use his post on the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, Congressman Frost, to support Central Florida’s burgeoning status as a simulation tech hub, which employs a strong workforce across major industries in Orlando, such as aerospace, defense, healthcare, and aviation. Congressman Frost will also use his committee post to reaffirm Florida’s status as a central hub for NASA and space exploration.

In Congress, Frost is committed to representing the people of his hometown in Orlando and Central Florida and being their voice in Washington, D.C. Frost is laser-focused on working to deliver change and results on issues of housing affordability, healthcare, abortion rights, LGBTQ+ rights, voting rights, transportation, justice reform, climate change and more.

-  Our Mission 
-  Commissioners 
-  Offices and Staff 
-  Careers 
-  Acquisition Opportunities 
-  Rankin Memorial Library 
-  FAQs
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2325 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for a 

pharmaceutical and technology ombudsman under the Medicare program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 14, 2015 

Mrs. BROOKS of Indiana (for herself and Mr. BILIRAKIS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, 

and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period 

to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 

concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide 

for a pharmaceutical and technology ombudsman under 

the Medicare program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MEDICARE PHARMACEUTICAL AND TECH4 NOLOGY OMBUDSMAN. 

5 Section 1808(c) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

6 1395b–9(c)) is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing new paragraph: 


SSpencer on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2325 IH

1 ‘‘(4) PHARMACEUTICAL AND TECHNOLOGY OM2 BUDSMAN.—Not later than 12 months after the date 

3 of the enactment of this paragraph, the Secretary 

4 shall provide for a pharmaceutical and technology 

5 ombudsman within the Centers for Medicare & Med6 icaid Services who shall receive and respond to com7 plaints, grievances, and requests that— 

8 ‘‘(A) are from entities that manufacture 

9 pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device, 

10 or diagnostic products that are covered or for 

11 which coverage is being sought under this title; 

12 and 

13 ‘‘(B) regard coverage, coding, or payment 

14 under this title for such products.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2021254EN.01000301.xml

| 29.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 254/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 254/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10171 — INEOS/Daimler/Mercedes-Benz Grand Prix)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 254/03)

On 23 June 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10171. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10171. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Skip to main content

Privacy Policy•Site map

# Public Release of Rulings and Decisions

Vaccine petitioners should be aware that any decision, or other ruling, filed in a vaccine case will be made available to the public unless either party files, within 14 days, an objection to the disclosure of any material in the decision “which is trade secret or commercial or financial information which is privileged and confidential” or “which are medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B); see also Vaccine Rule 18(b).  Public disclosure includes releasing each decision or ruling online by posting it on the court’s website.  **This means the decision, or ruling, will be available on the internet.**

If vaccine petitioners have concerns about such disclosure, guidance should be sought from counsel.  **In all events, petitioner’s counsel should endeavor to ensure petitioner is aware of and understands the time-limited opportunity to seek redaction in accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B) and Vaccine Rule 18(b).**

Howard T. Markey National Courts Building • 717 Madison Place, NW, Washington, DC 20439 • 202-357-6400
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

BLANCA A. BAJANA ESPINOZA

, Appellant,

v.

LUIS F. JACOME CHERREZ a/k/a FELIPE JACOME

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 1514

[ October 4, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Dale C. Cohen , Judge; L.T. Case No. FMCE16

- 014145

.

Lina M. Leon of Lina M. Leon, P.A., Princeton, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

D AMOORGIAN

, C IKLIN and C ONNER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Nyack Hospital, Appellant, et al., Plaintiff, v General Motors Acceptance Corporation et al., Respondents.

Submitted February 13, 2007;

decided February 20, 2007

Motion by Government Employees Insurance Company et al. for leave to appear amici curiae on the appeal herein denied as untimely *(see*Rules of Prac of Ct of Appeals [22 NYCRR] § 500.23).
#### MUTUAL LIFE INS. CO. OF NEW YORK v. NEWELL et al.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.

May 14, 1894.)

Mortgages—Rights of Mortgagee—Payment of Taxes afte t Forechorore The right of a mortgagee to a lien for taxes paid to protect his interest depends not on covenants in the bond or mortgage, but on the general principles of equity, and it is not affected by the merger of the bond and mortgage in a judgment of foreclosure.

Appeal from special term, Westchester county.

Action by the Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York against Darius C. Newell and another to foreclose a mortgage. From an order amending the judgment of foreclosure so as to include taxes paid by plaintiff after the judgment was entered, Albert C. Benedict, grantee of the equity of the mortgaged land, appeals. Modified.

Argued before BROWN, P. J., and PRATT, J.

R. E. & A. J. Prime & Burns, for appellant Albert C. Benedict.

Miller & Wells (James A. Briggs, of counsel), for respondent.

PRATT, J.

The right of the mortgagee to protect his interest by payment of taxes, which become a superior lien, depends not upon the covenants in the bond or mortgage, but upon the general principles of equity. It follows that the merger of the bond and mortgage in the judgment has no effect upon the right. The general powers of the court are ample to make such corrections in the judgment as the changed conditions render necessary. We observé that a small amount paid by the mortgagee for insurance against fire was allowed at special term. The order appealed from should be modified by striking out the sum allowed for insurance, and, as thus modified, affirmed, with costs.