alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2004 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2004

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to provide for more effective 
                 online education verification metrics.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 23, 2015

  Mr. Byrne introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to provide for more effective 
                 online education verification metrics.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Online Education Verification Act''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT FOR SECURE LOGIN AND PASSCODE.

    Section 496(a)(4)(B)(ii) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 
U.S.C. 1099b(a)(4)(B)(ii)) is amended by inserting after ``processes'' 
the following: ``, in addition to requiring a secure login and passcode 
for coursework on the Internet,''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of R&G Financial Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
undersigned's best knowledge and belief:

         (a) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated this 15th day of March, 2004.

                                                  R&G Financial Corporation
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  ("Company")

                                                  /s/ Victor J. Galan
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Victor J. Galan
                                                  Chief Executive Officer

                                                  /s/ Joseph R. Sandoval
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Joseph R. Sandoval
                                                  Chief Financial Officer

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Marc M. Hazout certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2013, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of Silver Dragon
Resources Inc.

Dated: March 28, 2014

|/s/ Marc M. Hazout                         | 
|------------------------------------------ | 
|Marc M. Hazout                             | 
|President and Chief Executive Officer      | 
|Principal Financial and Accounting Officer | 

---
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 1 3

- 40554 Summary Calendar

ALOECORP, INCORPORATED,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. DAMKEN, L.L.C.,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Sou thern District of Texas USDC No. 7:11

- CV

- 86

Before WIENER, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Defendant

- Appellant Damken, L.L.C. appeals the judgment of the
district court implementing the jury’s award of damages for breach of the
construction contract between Damken and Plaintiff

- Appellee Aloecorp,
Inco rporated . Our review of the record brought forward on appeal, in light of
the applicable law as reflected in the appellate briefs of the parties, satisfies us that Damken’s claims , including that the district court abused its discretion

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 6, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-40554 Document: 00512490088 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/06/2014No. 13

- 40554 (1) by denying Damken’s motion for partial judgment on the pleadings and for judgment as a matter of law for anticipatory breach, early termination, and repudiation of a construction contract at issue, and (2) by refusing to submit the issue of restitution to the jury, a re not sustained by the facts or the law. In sum, we perceive no reversible error and therefor affirm the district court’s award of damages, attorney’s fees and costs, court costs, and post

- judgment
interest. AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 13-40554 Document: 00512490088 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/06/2014
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JARED B. SEGAL

, Appellant,

v.

PETCO ANIMAL SUPPLIES STORES, INC.

, a foreign profit corporation,

TOWN OF JUPITER , a Florida municipal corporation, RUSSELL

COUNTS, individually and KIMBERLY THOMPSON , individually

, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 17

- 1720

[ March 1, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit,

Palm Beach County ; David French , Judge; L.T. Case No. 50 2015 CA 9855

XXX MB

.

Robert C. Stone of Ro bert Stone, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellant.

Lyman H. Reynolds, Jr. and George P. Roberts, Jr. of Roberts Reynolds

Bedard & Tuzzio, PLLC, West Palm Beach, for appellees for Town of Jupiter

and Russell Counts.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

L EVINE

, C ONNER and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>   1

                                                              EXHIBIT 23


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Post Effective
Amendment No. 6 to the Shelf Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-12319),
in the Shelf Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-43917) and in the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-11791) pertaining to the 1996
Incentive Stock Plan, 1996 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan and 1996
Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Service Experts, Inc. of our report dated
February 23, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Service Experts, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 1997.


Nashville, Tennessee
March 13, 1998
Listen

# Gail Heriot

## Commissioner

Political Affiliation: IndependentTerm Ends: December 2025

Gail Heriot is a Professor of Law at the University of San Diego. Among her areas of expertise are civil rights, employment law, product liability, remedies, and torts. Her work has appeared in legal journals like the Michigan Law Review, the Virginia Law Review, and the Harvard Journal on Legislation. She also frequently writes for popular newspapers and magazines, including the Wall Street Journal, the National Review, the Los Angeles Times, and the San Diego Union Tribune. She is the editor and an author of a forthcoming anthology of essays entitled, "California Dreaming: Race, Gender, Proposition 209 and the Principle of Non-Discrimination."

Professor Heriot is a former civil rights counsel to the U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary and a former Associate Dean for Academic Affairs at George Mason University Law School. She has also served on several boards and is currently a member of the Board of Directors of the National Association of Scholar.

Prior to entering academia, she practiced law at the Washington law firm of Hogan & Hartson and the Chicago law firm of Mayer, Brown, & Platt. She clerked for the Honorable Seymour F. Simon of the Illinois Supreme Court.

Professor Heriot graduated with the highest distinction from Northwestern University in 1978 and earned her J.D. cum laude in 1981 from the University of Chicago Law School, where she served as an associate editor of the law review. She is a member of Phi Beta Kappa and the Order of Coif.

-  Our Mission 
-  Commissioners 
-  Offices and Staff 
-  Careers 
-  Acquisition Opportunities 
-  Rankin Memorial Library 
-  FAQs
# C_2021480EN.01000101.xml

| 29.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 480/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 480/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10498 – LIBERTY GLOBAL / INFRAVIA / LIBERTY NETWORKS GERMANY)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 480/01)

On 22 November 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10498. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10498. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### PEOPLE ex rel. COPPERS, Appellant, v. MURRAY et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 15, 1897.)

Proceeding on the relation of Edward Ooppers against Joseph Murray and others. A. Levy, for appellant. J. M. Mayer, for respondents.

No opinion. Proceeding affirmed, with costs.
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, TimPaterson-Brown, Chief Executive Officer of Medicsight, Inc. (the “Company”),certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)                                                  the Quarterly Report on Form10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)                                                  the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
|                   |   | By:    |   | /s/ TIM PATERSON-BROWN  |
|-------------------|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|              |   |   |   | Tim Paterson-Brown      |
|              |   |   |   | Chief Executive Officer |
|              |   |   |   |                    |
| November 14, 2006 |   |   |   |                    |

 

----
#### Sweeney *v.*New York, N. H. & H. R. Co.

*(Superior Court of New York City, General Term.*

June 27, 1890.)

Master and Servant—Negligence of Master.

In an action for injuries received by plaintiff while in the employ of defendant as a brakeman, by the breaking of a defective coupling link, it is error to instruct, as a matter of law, that defendant is guilty of actionable negligence, where the evidence tends to show that a fellow-servant of plaintiff used the defective link, though the defect was apparent on inspection, and defendant had provided other links which were perfectly safe.

Appeál from jury term.

Action by Owen Sweeney against the New York, New Haven & Hartford Bailroad Company for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff while in the employ of defendant as brakeman. The evidence went to show that the injuries were sustained in a collision caused by the breaking of a defective link connecting the tender of an engine with a freight-car. The defect was apparent on inspection. There was no evidence as to who put the link in place, but such duty devolved upon one of the crew to which plaintiff belonged. Judgment was given for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

Argued before Freedman and Truax, JJ.

*Page*cfe *Taft,*for appellant. *Thomas P. Wioltes,*for respondent.

Freedman, J.

Assuming that the trial judge was right in refusing to dismiss the complaint, and in holding that the plaintiff was not guilty of contributory negligence, and that the proximate cause of plaintiff’s injury was the breaking of the coupling link between the tender and the car next to it of defendant’s train, it does not follow that the breaking of the said coupling link constituted negligence *per se*in the defendant. From the evidence on this point, although uncontradicted, reasonable minds may draw different conclusions. In a certain aspect of the case the jury might have reached the conclusion that a fellow-servant of the plaintiff negligently used the said coupling link, notwithstanding its insufficiency and defect were apparent on a bare inspection, and although the defendant had provided quite a number of others which were perfectly safe and sufficient, and from which a selection should have been made by such fellow-servant. The question of defendant’s negligence was therefore one of fact, to be determined by the jury, and it was error in law to withdraw it from the consideration of the jury, and to hold that the defendant had been guilty of negligence, as matter of law, in not having provided a safe and sufficient coupling link, and to instruct the jury that the only question to be determined by them was the question of damages. As the error specified necessitated a new trial, it is not necessary to discuss the other questions in the case. The judgment and order should be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.
Exhibit 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

1.   Capital Title Agency Inc., an Arizona corporation

2.   New Century Holding Company, a California corporation

3.   New Century Title Company, a California corporation

4.   NAC1031 Exchange Services, a California corporation

5.   CTG Building Co., an Arizona corporation

6.   Capital Information Services, Inc., an Arizona corporation

7.   Nations Holding Group, a California corporation

8.   United Title Company, a California corporation

9.   First California Title Company, a California corporation

10.  United Title Insurance Company, a California corporation

11.  Shatto Exchange Services, a California corporation

12.  Shatto Information Systems, Inc., a California corporation

13.  AdvantageWare, Inc., a California corporation
     -An 80% owned subsidiary

14.  Land Title of Nevada, Inc., a Nevada corporation
#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Ave Diversion                    
csv

#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Ave Diversion                    
json
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2180 

To authorize grantees of Department of Justice grants to set up task forces 

on policing in local communities, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 30, 2015 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To authorize grantees of Department of Justice grants to 

set up task forces on policing in local communities, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Local Task Forces on 

5 21st Century Policing Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. USE OF FUNDS TO ESTABLISH TASK FORCES. 

7 Section 501(a)(1) of the Omnibus Crime Control and 

8 Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3751(a)(1)) is 

9 amended by adding at the end the following: 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2180 IH

1 ‘‘(H) The establishment of a task force, 

2 composed of individuals with relevant experi3 ence or subject-matter expertise in law enforce4 ment, civil rights, and civil liberties, which shall 

5 identify the best ways to create an effective 

6 partnership between law enforcement officers of 

7 a unit of local government and the community 

8 those officers serve that reduces crime and in9 creases trust.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Flaming Gorge Technical Working Group

Meeting Notes

Friday, May 18, 2018

In attendance: Heather Patno, Jerry Wilhite, Kevin Bestgen, Tom Chart, Jed Parker, George 

Weekly, Don Anderson, Dave Speas

1. May 18, 2018 Hydrology Review

a. Flaming Gorge April-July forecast = 1,120,000 acre-feet, average (below median) 

hydrologic classification.

b. Yampa-Maybell + Lily April-July forecast = 841,000 acre-feet (66% of 30-year 

average, moderately dry hydrologic classification.

c. Combined hydrology leads to recommendation to operate Flaming Gorge within 

the moderately dry hydrologic classification.

d. Yampa 15-day deterministic model from the CBRFC presently indicates a 

gradually decreasing flow from the ~9,000 cfs peak which occurred on May 13, 

2018.

2. Managed floodplain discussion

a. Johnson Bottom

i. Likely requires sustained flows of 12,000 cfs or more to be able to utilize.

ii. Flows of 12,000 cfs or more will require significant bypass flows.

iii. Unlikely to recommend using Johnson bottom during the 2018 runoff 

period.

b. Stuart Lake

i. Discussion on the extensive effort required to remove or control cattails 

previous to the runoff period

ii. Division of Wildlife Resources recommends filling Stuart Lake to assist in 

cattail control

iii. Flows at or above 10,000 cfs would be recommended to manage Stuart 

Lake

iv. No concerns regarding water quality impacts from the burning of 

vegetation because supplemental water has been used to assist operations

3. Larval emergence

a. Two possible razorback larvae were detected in light traps on Thursday, May 17. 

Confirmation of razorback identification is not complete.

b. A single razorback larva was detected in Stewart Lake light traps on the morning 

of Friday, May 18.

4. Increasing Flaming Gorge Dam releases

a. Increasing flows to power plant capacity, beginning Monday, May 21, was 

suggested.

b. Consensus was reached to move ahead with directive and notifications regarding 

power plant capacity flows beginning on Monday.

5. Flaming Gorge update

a. Jed to compose a more in-depth update to send out to the Flaming Gorge 

notification group over the weekend.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION OF OFFICERS
                          OF US GLOBAL NANOSPACE, INC.
                           PURSUANT TO 18 USC ss. 1350

      Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a)
      and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) each
      of the undersigned officers of US Global Nanospace, Inc. (the "Company")
      does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

            (a)   The quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
                  September 30, 2003 of the Company fully complies with the
                  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities
                  Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (b)   Information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated:  February 23, 2004


/s/John Robinson
----------------------------------------
John Robinson,
Chief Executive Officer


/s/Julie Seaman
----------------------------------------
Julie Seaman,
Chief Financial Officer
# C_2021103EN.01000101.xml

| 25.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10192 — Linde/Hyosung/JVs)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 103/01)

On 18 March 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10192. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10192. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I hereby certify
that:








I
have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009.








To
the best of my knowledge this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QA (i) fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange
Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m (a) or 78o (d)); and, (ii) the information contained
in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Tengasco, Inc. and its subsidiaries
during the period covered by this report.














Dated:
November 13, 2009


By: s/Michael J. Rugen
              Michael
      J. Rugen
              Chief
      Financial Officer