alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2021314EN.01001001.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 6.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 314/10 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10307 — Oxford Properties/M7 Real Estate)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 314/08)

1.

On 29 July 2021, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2021314EN.01001001-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Oxford Properties Management (UK) Limited (‘Oxord Properties’, United Kingdom) controlled by Oxford Properties Group (Canada) and belonging to the OMERS Group (Canada); |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | M7 Real Estate Ltd (‘M7 Real Estate’, United Kingdom). |

Oxord Properties acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of M7 Real Estate.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for Oxord Properties: ownership, development and managment of real estate assets in Europe. |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for M7 Real Estate: investment asset manager focussing on the real estate sector and, in particular, on pan-European, regional, multi-tenanted commercial real estate. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2021314EN.01001001-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10307 — Oxford Properties/M7 Real Estate

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2021314EN.01001001-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2021314EN.01001001-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
#### Grant Brown et al., Respondents, v Midtown Medical Care Center et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

[947 NYS2d 109]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered on or about June 2, 2011, which, insofar as appealed from, in this action alleging medical malpractice, granted plaintiffs’ motion to amend the caption and complaint to include a cause of action against Dr. John McKnight, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs allege a failure to diagnose and properly treat the decedent’s lung cancer while she was a patient at defendant Midtown Medical Care Center. For purposes of the statute of limitations, Dr. McKnight is united in interest with Midtown Medical Care Center, with whom he had an employment relationship giving rise to vicarious liability, and allowing the physician to be charged with notice of the action *(see*CPLR 203 [c]; *Buran v Coupal,*87 NY2d 173, 178 [1995]; *Alamo v Citident, Inc.,*72 AD3d 498 [2010]; *Cuello v Patel,*257 AD2d 499, 500 [1999]). Dr. McKnight should have known that, but for plaintiffs’ mistake in identifying the treating provider on the dates in questions, he would have been timely named in this action. Moreover, there is no showing of bad faith in plaintiffs’ mistake or prejudice *(see Buran*at 178-181; *Austin v Interfaith Med. Ctr.,*264 AD2d 702, 704 [1999]). Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Andrias, Acosta and Freedman, JJ.
# C_2021184EN.01000201.xml

| 12.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10200 — Blackstone/GIP/Cascade/Signature)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 184/02)

On 7 May 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10200. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10200. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

                              CERTIFICATION OF THE
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, Steven M. Grubner, Chief Financial Officer of Genethera, Inc. (the
"Company"), do hereby that to the best of my knowledge and belief that:

      (1) The Company's annual report on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended
December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: June 3, 2005

By: /s/ Steven M. Grubner
---------------------------
Steven M. Grubner
Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 178 (Friday, September 17, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51873-51874]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-20175]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XB424]


Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of informational webinars.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council (Council) will 
host informational webinars on behalf of NOAA Fisheries regarding the 
implementation of the Southeast For-Hire Integrated Electronic 
Reporting Program.

DATES: The Council will host two For-Hire Vessel Monitoring System 
Requirements informational webinars on October 7, 2021, from 10 a.m. to 
11:30 a.m. EDT and on October 12, 2021, from 6 p.m. until 7:30 p.m. 
EDT.

ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held via webinar.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Emily Muehlstein, Public Information 
Officer, Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council; telephone: (813) 
348-1630.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Council, on behalf of NOAA Fisheries, 
will host informational webinars regarding the upcoming implementation 
of vessel monitoring system (VMS) requirements for the Southeast For-
Hire Integrated Electronic Reporting Program. Requirements for Gulf of 
Mexico federal charter/headboat permit holders are anticipated to 
become effective December 13, 2021. The informational webinars will 
provide an

[[Page 51874]]

overview of regulations, allow vendors to present available, approved 
VMS units, and provide opportunities for participants to ask questions 
about the program and VMS units.
    The webinars are open to the public. Registration is required. 
Additional information, including links to registration is available 
at: https://gulfcouncil.org/public-hearings-scoping-workshops/.
    The end times specified for these webinars are subject to change.
    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: September 14, 2021.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-20175 Filed 9-16-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph Klemm, Appellant.

*827The complete failure of the trial court to instruct the jury with respect to the evaluation of the identification evidence presented *(see, People v Whalen,*59 NY2d 273; *People v McKenzie,*97 AD2d 774; *People v Daniels,*88 AD2d 392), and its similar total neglect to charge the jury as to the defendant’s alibi defense *(see, People v Vera,*94 AD2d 728) mandate reversal, despite the fact that the errors were not preserved for appellate review. Mollen, P. J., Brown, Niehoff and Kooper, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Mark
Westgate, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge, the Annual
Report of NexMed, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on
10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of NexMed, Inc.




Date:
      March 12, 2009.
              By:
              /s/ Mark WestgateName:
      Mark Westgate
                Title:
      Chief Financial Officer
# L_2010247DE.01009701.xml

| 21.9.2010 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 247/97 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2010

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 247/97

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1272/2009 der Kommission vom 11. Dezember 2009 mit gemeinsamen Durchführungsbestimmungen zur Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1234/2007 des Rates hinsichtlich des An- und Verkaufs von landwirtschaftlichen Erzeugnissen im Rahmen der öffentlichen Intervention

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 349 vom 29. Dezember 2009
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 349 vom 29. Dezember 2009

Auf Seite 7, Artikel 10 Absatz 1 Buchstabe a Ziffer iv:

anstatt:

„bei Getreide und Reis den zugelassenen Lagerort eines Interventionsortes, für den unter Berücksichtigung von Artikel 29 das niedrigste Angebot abgegeben wird; dieser Lagerort darf nicht der Lagerort sein, an dem sich das Erzeugnis zum Zeitpunkt der Einreichung des Angebots befindet,“

muss es heißen:

„bei Getreide und Reis den zugelassenen Lagerort eines Interventionsortes, auf den sich das Angebot bezieht, zu den geringsten Kosten unter Berücksichtigung von Artikel 29; dieser Lagerort darf nicht der Lagerort sein, an dem sich das Erzeugnis zum Zeitpunkt der Einreichung des Angebots befindet,“.

Auf Seite 13, Artikel 29 Absatz 1:

anstatt:

„Die Kosten für die Beförderung des Getreides bzw. des Reises bis zu dem vom Anbieter bzw. Bieter gemäß Artikel 10 Absatz 1 Buchstabe a Ziffer iv bezeichneten Lagerort mit den niedrigsten Kosten gehen bis zu einer Entfernung von 100 km zulasten des Anbieters bzw. Bieters. Über die Entfernung von 100 km hinausgehende Transportkosten gehen zulasten der Interventionsstelle.“

muss es heißen:

„Die Kosten für die Beförderung des Getreides bzw. des Reises bis zu dem vom Anbieter bzw. Bieter gemäß Artikel 10 Absatz 1 Buchstabe a Ziffer iv bezeichneten Lagerort zu den geringsten Kosten gehen bis zu einer Entfernung von 100 km zulasten des Anbieters bzw. Bieters. Über die Entfernung von 100 km hinausgehende Transportkosten gehen zulasten der Interventionsstelle.“

---
STARVATION RESERVOIRLatitude: 40.193Longitude: -110.447Elevation: 5723

STARVATION RESERVOIR

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Currant Creek Site Page...



Currant Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Daniels-Strawberry Site Page...



Daniels-Strawberry

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Wilbur Bench Site Page...



Wilbur Bench

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Strawberry Divide Site Page...



Strawberry Divide

Courtesy NRCS - Go to White River #1 Site Page...



White River #1
#### Booker T. Sanders, Appellant, v Marino Falcone Brick Contracting, Inc., Respondent.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jones, J.), dated January 23, 1985, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint as abandoned, pursuant to CPLR 3215 (c), and denied his cross motion to compel the defendant to serve an answer.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Since the appellant failed to move for leave to enter a default judgment within one year after the defendant’s default in answering (CPLR 3215 [c]), he was required to demonstrate the merits of his cause of action and an excuse for the delay *343
      *(see, Valentin v Rinder,*65 AD2d 716). Although the appellant’s affidavit suffices to demonstrate a meritorious claim, the proffered excuse constitutes law office failure. "Notwithstanding [a] court’s discretion to excuse defaults resulting from law office failure in the interests of justice, the * * * amendments to the CPLR (CPLR 2005, 3012, subd [d], L 1983, ch 318), do not guarantee that a default will be excused in all cases” *(Grosso v Hauck,*99 AD2d 750). Based on the lengthy delay and unacceptable excuse proffered by the appellant’s counsel, Special Term did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the action *(Grosso v Hauck, supra; Montalvo v Nel Taxi Corp.,*114 AD2d 494, *appeal dismissed*68 NY2d 643). It is noteworthy that the interests of justice do not warrant vacatur of the appellant’s default, as the dismissal of the complaint herein was not on the merits and, therefore, has no affect upon this court’s prior decision in a related but separate action, granting leave to the appellant to amend his complaint to name the respondent, the third-party defendant fourth-party plaintiff in that action, as a direct defendant *(see, Matter of Sanders v Samsol Homes,*121 AD2d 526). Brown, J. P., Niehoff, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
Order entered October 9, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00687-CR

CHRISTY ALLANE RODRIGUEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 397th Judicial District Court

Grayson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 064768

ORDER

On September 8, 2015, this Court struck the Anders brief filed by counsel in support of 

his motion to withdraw because it did not comply with the requirements of Anders v. California

and its progeny. We ordered appellant to file an amended brief within thirty days. The Court 

now has before it counsel’s October 7, 2015 motion seeking a thirty-day extension of time to file 

the amended brief, citing his caseload as the basis for the requested extension.

We GRANT the motion and ORDER counsel to file, within THIRTY DAYS of the date 

of this order, either an Anders brief that adequately addresses all of the issues identified above or 

a brief raising issues on the merits. No further extensions will be granted.

We ORDER We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to counsel for all 

parties.

/s/ ADA BROWN

JUSTICE
# L_2018284EN.01003801.xml

| 12.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 284/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 284/38

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (EC) No 810/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 establishing a Community Code on Visas (Visa Code)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 243 of 15 September 2009
  )

On page 11, Article 19(2), the second sentence:

for:

‘Data shall be entered in the VIS only by duly authorised consular staff in accordance with Articles 6(1), 7, 9(5) and 9(6) of the VIS Regulation.’,

read:

‘Data shall be entered in the VIS only by duly authorised consular staff in accordance with Article 6(1), Article 7 and points (5) and (6) of Article 9 of the VIS Regulation.’;

on page 23, Article 54, point (b) of point (3), opening wording:

for:

| ‘(b) | paragraph 4 shall be amended as follows:’, |
| --- | --- |

‘(b)

paragraph 4 shall be amended as follows:’,

read:

| ‘(b) | point 4 shall be amended as follows:’. |
| --- | --- |

‘(b)

point 4 shall be amended as follows:’.

---
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-08-088-CR

FA’NAE LEROYCE ANDERSON  						APPELLANT

A/K/A FANAI ANDERSON	

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	 STATE

	------------

	FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------	

	Appellant Fa’Nae Leroyce Anderson a/k/a Fanai Anderson is attempting to appeal from her conviction for aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon.  We will dismiss the appeal.

	In accordance with rule 25.2(a)(2), the trial court has certified that this criminal case “is a plea-bargained case and the defendant has NO right of appeal” and that “the defendant has waived the right of appeal.”  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).  On March 24, 2008, we notified Anderson that this certification indicating that she had no right to appeal and that she had waived her right of appeal had been filed in this court and that her appeal would be dismissed unless she or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d), 44.3.  We received no response.

	Therefore, in accordance with the trial court’s certification, we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), 43.2(f); Cooper v. State, 45 S.W.3d 77, 81 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001).

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:	WALKER, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and MCCOY, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: April 24, 2008
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION**
I, David W. Odell, Chief Financial Officer of Hyperion Solutions Corporation, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of HyperionSolutions Corporation (the “Registrant”); 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The Registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theRegistrant and have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the Registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c)  Disclosed in this report any change in theRegistrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the Registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5.  The Registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theRegistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information;and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significantrole in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Dated: February 9, 2005   /s/ DAVID W. ODELL    David W. Odell  Chief Financial Officer
NRCS 442 - DIAMOND LAKELatitude: 43.183Longitude: -122.133Elevation: None

NRCS 442 - Diamond Lake

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Annie Springs Site Page...



Annie Springs

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Diamond Lake Site Page...



Diamond Lake

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Summit Lake Site Page...



Summit Lake