alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order filed November 30, 2020 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-18-00152-CR

____________

DANIEL TRAVIS DURHAM, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 185th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1433944

ORDER

This court has determined, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 

34.5(f) and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of State's Exhibit 14-A.

The clerk of the 185th District Court is directed to deliver to the Clerk of this 

court the original of State's Exhibit 14-A, on or before December 07, 2020. The 

Clerk of this court is directed to receive, maintain, and keep safe this original 
exhibit; to deliver it to the justices of this court for their inspection; and, upon 

completion of inspection, to return the original of State's Exhibit 14-A, to the clerk 

of the 185th District Court.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Wise, Jewell and Poissant.
CERTIFICATIONS
 
 I,
Raymond R. Brandstrom, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:
 
 1.
    I
      have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Emeritus
      Corporation;
 
 2.
    Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report;
 
 3.
    Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
      registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.
    The
      registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and have:
 
 (a)
    Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
      that material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;
 
 (b)
    Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures
      and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
      the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
      covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c)
    Disclosed
      in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
      fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting; and
 
 5.
    The
      registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
      most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
      the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's
      board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a)
    All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 (b)
    Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.
 
 /s/
      Raymond R. BrandstromRaymond
      R. BrandstromChief
      Financial OfficerMay
      12, 2005
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 

_______________________________ 

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 

Complainant 

vs. 

PAUL S. HUTCHINSON 

Respondent. 

______________________________ Docket Number: CG S&R 07-0568 

CG Case No. 3080473

 

MEMORANDUM OF POST HEARING TELECONFERENCE AND AMENDED 

ORDER 

Issued: July 24, 2008

Issued by: Walter J. Brudzinski, Administrative Law Judge

On motion of Respondent’s counsel, the parties and the undersigned participated in a 

post-hearing teleconference to discuss technical amendments to the DECISION AND ORDER 

issued July 21, 2008. 

Respondent’s counsel advised that the twelve (12) month period of outright suspension 

should start March 4, 2008, the date Respondent deposited his expired license with the Coast 

Guard. 

Since 46 CFR 5.567(e) provides that “[t]he time of any period of outright suspension 

ordered does not commence until the license . . . is surrendered to the Coast Guard,” the July 21, 

2008 Decision and Order is amended to reflect that Respondent’s outright suspension started on 

March 4, 2008. 

WHEREFORE, 
AMENDED ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent Paul Scott Hutchinson’s license and all 

other documents held by Respondent are SUSPENDED outright for a period of twelve (12) 

months, said term of outright suspension shall commence on March 4, 2008, the day he 

deposited his license with the Coast Guard. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that service of this AMENDED ORDER on the parties 

and/or parties’ representatives serves as notice of appeal rights set forth in 33 CFR 20.1001-

20.1004 which were enclosed as Attachment C to the July 21, 2008 DECISION AND ORDER. 

The thirty (30) day period shall run from this date. 

Done and dated July 24, 2008 

New York, NY 

____________________________________ 

WALTER J. BRUDZINSKI 

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE

U.S. COAST GUARD 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have this day served the foregoing MEMORANDUM OF POST 

HEARING TELECONFERENCE AND AMENDED ORDER upon the following parties (or their 

designated representatives) to this proceeding at the addresses indicated by facsimile. 

USCG Sector Boston 

Attn: Investigation Department 

427 Commercial Street 

Boston, MA 02109 

Telephone: (617) 557-9081 

Facsimile: (617) 223-3032 

Brian P. Flanagan, Esquire 

One Wolcott Road 

Winchester, MA 01890 

Telephone: (781) 369-1027 

Facsimile: (781) 369-1027 

USCG, ALJ Docketing Center 

40 S. Gay Street, Room 412 

Baltimore, MD 21202-4022 

Telephone: (410) 962-7434 

Facsimile: (410) 962-1746 

Done and dated July 24, 2008 

New York, New York 

 ____________________________ 

Regina V. Maye 

 Paralegal Specialist to the 

 Administrative Law Judge 

 Telephone: (212) 668-2970 

 Facsimile: (212) 825-1230
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD,

Complainant,

vs.

MARK JOHN FRITZ,

Respondent.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket Number: 2023-0439

Enforcement Activity ID: 7824621

CONSENT ORDER

Issued: February 5, 2024

By Order of Chief Administrative Law Judge: Hon. Walter J. Brudzinski

Appearances:

For the Coast Guard

CWO Andrew Kalbrener

USCG Sector Maryland – National Capital Region

For the Respondent

Mark John Fritz, pro se
CONSENT ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

On January 30, 2024, the parties in this case submitted a Motion for Approval of a 

Settlement Agreement and Entry of Consent Order to the Administrative Law Judge for approval 

under 33 C.F.R. § 20.502.

I have carefully reviewed the terms of the Settlement Agreement and find that it is fair, 

reasonable, and in substantial compliance with the requirements of 33 C.F.R. § 20.502.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the record, it is hereby ORDERED that the Settlement Agreement 

is APPROVED in full and incorporated herein by reference. This Consent Order shall 

constitute full, final, and complete adjudication of this proceeding.

______________________________________

Hon. Walter J. Brudzinski

Chief Administrative Law Judge

United States Coast Guard

Date: February 5, 2024
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2021244EN.01002401.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 22.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 244/24 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10302 — Standard Industries/Grace)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 244/12)

1.

On 15 June 2021, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2021244EN.01002401-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Standard Industries Holding Inc. (‘Standard Industries’, USA), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | W.R.Grace & Co. (‘Grace’, USA). |

Standard Industries acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of Grace.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Standard Industries is a global holding company with interests in the building materials industry. Standard Industries is mainly active in the manufacture and sale of commercial and residential roofing and other construction products, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Grace is engaged in the production and sale of a selection of specialty chemicals and materials on a global basis. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2021244EN.01002401-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10302 — Standard Industries/Grace

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2021244EN.01002401-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2021244EN.01002401-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00414-CV

A. E. and J. L., Appellants

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 274TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY, 

NO. C2012-1407C, THE HONORABLE GARY L. STEEL, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant J. L. filed his notice of appeal on July 1, 2014. The appellant=s brief 

was due August 20, 2014. On August 26, 2014, counsel for appellant filed a motion for 

extension of time to file appellant’s brief.

Amendments to the rules of judicial administration accelerate the final disposition

of appeals from suits for termination of parental rights. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a) 

(providing 180 days for court’s final disposition). The accelerated schedule constrains this 

Court’s leeway in granting extensions. In this instance, we will grant the motion and order 

counsel to file appellant=s brief no later than September 2, 2014. If the brief is not filed by that 

date, counsel may be required to show cause why she should not be held in contempt of court.

It is ordered on August 27, 2014.

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Field
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         198,903
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  123,658
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,752
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               361,650
<PP&E>                                       2,303,051
<DEPRECIATION>                                 742,391
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,253,824
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,020,769
<BONDS>                                        415,362
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,231
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,653,731
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,253,824
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,348,504
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,635,656
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (287,152)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    42,434
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (244,718)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (244,718)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 12
                                                                      ----------




[GRAPHIC OMITTED]  Gilbert Laustsen Jung
                   Associates Ltd.   Petroleum Consultants
                   4100, 400 - 3rd Avenue S.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 4H2
                   (403) 266-9500    Fax (403) 262-1855




                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS



We consent to the use of our report with respect to the oil sand mining reserves
data of Canadian Natural Resources Limited incorporated by reference in its (i)
Annual Report (Form 40-F) for the year ended December 31, 2004 and (ii)
Registration Statement on Form F-9 (Registration No. 333-104919), filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. The reserves were assigned as of February 9,
2005.

                                                Yours very truly,

                                                GILBERT LAUSTSEN JUNG
                                                ASSOCIATES LTD.

                                                ORIGINALLY SIGNED BY

                                                James H. Willmon, P. Eng.
                                                Vice-President

Dated:  March 18, 2005
Calgary, Alberta
# C_2021390EN.01001001.xml

| 27.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 390/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 390/10

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10360 — Assicurazioni Generali/Società Cattolica Di Assicurazione)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 390/07)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Assicurazioni Generali S.p.A. (‘Generali’, Italy), |
| --- | --- |

—

Assicurazioni Generali S.p.A. (‘Generali’, Italy),

| — | Società Cattolica di Assicurazione S.p.A. (‘Cattolica’, Italy). |
| --- | --- |

—

Società Cattolica di Assicurazione S.p.A. (‘Cattolica’, Italy).

Generali acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Cattolica.

The concentration is accomplished by way of public bid announced by Generali on 31 May 2021.

2.

| — | for Generali: the provision and distribution of life and non-life insurance products, reinsurance products, assistance services, and real estate and asset management services; |
| --- | --- |

—

for Generali: the provision and distribution of life and non-life insurance products, reinsurance products, assistance services, and real estate and asset management services;

| — | for Cattolica: the provision and distribution of life and non-life insurance products, reinsurance products, as well as ancillary and support activities. |
| --- | --- |

—

for Cattolica: the provision and distribution of life and non-life insurance products, reinsurance products, as well as ancillary and support activities.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10360 — Assicurazioni Generali/Società Cattolica Di Assicurazione

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
Skip to main content

Privacy Policy•Site map

# Requesting a Certificate of Good Standing

To request a Certificate of Good Standing, an attorney must send a letter, which includes the attorney's current contact information (name, firm/office, address, phone number, e-mail address) along with the attorney's admission date and the required fee in the form of a check made payable to Clerk, U.S. Court of Federal Claims, to the following address:

Office of the Clerk of CourtUnited States Court of Federal Claims717 Madison Place, NWWashington, DC 20439

For assistance, please call the Clerk's Office at (202) 357-6406.

The Clerk's Office will process the request within one week of receipt. The completed certificate will be mailed to the requesting attorney at the attorney's official address of record in the court's CM/ECF system unless otherwise directed.

Howard T. Markey National Courts Building • 717 Madison Place, NW, Washington, DC 20439 • 202-357-6400
### The Honorable Henry Woods, United States District Judge for 1 

### the Eastern District of Arkansas. ___________ No. 95-3496

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Joseph William Folen, IV, * * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: May 30, 1996 Filed: June 4, 1996

___________ Before McMILLIAN, WOLLMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.
Joseph William Folen, IV, appeals his conviction following hi s conditional guilty plea to conspiring to violate 18 U.S.C. § 842(i), which prohibits felons from possessing explosives that have travelled i n interstate commerce. We affirm.
Folen anda friend broke into a storage shed at a quarry in Pulaski County, Arkansas, and stole explosives. After his arrest, Folen pleaded guilty to an information charging him with conspiring "to posses s explosives which had been shipped or transported in interstate commerce." Having reserved his right to challenge the constitutionality of sectio n 842 (i), Folen moved the court to dismiss the information, citing Unite d States v . Lopez , 115 S. Ct. 1624, 1634 (1995). The district court 1 rejected Folen's challenge

### -2-

and s entenced him to sixty months imprisonment and three years o f supervised release.

On appea l, Folen argues that Congress has exceeded its power unde r the Commerce Clause by continuing to regulate indefinitely the possession of explosives after they have crossed state lines; and that his conduct, which occurred entirely within Pulaski County, c onstituted a local offense and did not substantially affect interstate commerce.
The const itutionality of a statute is a legal question we review de novo. United States v. Monteleone , 77 F.3d 1086, 1091 (8th Cir. 1996).
Section 8 42(i)(1) makes it unlawful for a felon to "possess an y explosive which has been shipped or transported in interstate . .
. commerce." We hold that section 842(i)(1) is constitutional because its exp ress jurisdictional element ensures that it regulates only th e possession of explosi ves that have travelled in interstate commerce. Cf. UnitedStates v. Bates , 77 F.3d 1101, 1104 (8th Cir. 1996) (upholding 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) because it contains express jurisdictional elemen t lim iting regulation to firearm possessions with explicit nexus t o interstate commerce). The interstate nexus is not dependent upon a defendant's personal interstate transportation of the explosives h e possessed. Cf. United States v. Shelton , 66 F.3 d 991, 992 (8th Cir. 1995) (per curia m) (for purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), interstate nexus i s suf ficient where firearm has at some time been in interstate commerce) , cert. denied , 116 S. Ct. 1364 (1996). Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

### -3- A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
EX-4.2





 Exhibit 4.2 
 



 
 MANYCORE TECH INC. Number Class A Ordinary Share(s) Incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands Share capital is US$200,000
divided into (i) 5,527,000,000 Class A Ordinary Shares of a par value of US$0.000025 each. (i) 473,000,000 Class B Ordinary Shares of a par value of US$0.0CC025 each and (iii) 2,000,000,000 Shares of a par value of US50.000025 each of such
class or classes (however designated) as the board of directors may determine in accordance with the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the Company. THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT is the registered holder of Class A Ordinary Share(s) in the
above-named Company subject to the Memorandum and Articles of Association thereof. EXECUTED on behalf of the said Company on the day of by: DIRECTOR