alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATIONS
 
 I, Daniel R. Baty, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Emeritus Corporation;
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
 /s/    Daniel R. Baty
 Daniel R. Baty
 Chief Executive Officer
 August 12, 2004
EXHIBIT 99(.2)




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Blount International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Calvin
E. Jenness, Vice President - Corporate Controller & Treasurer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (i) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.




/s/ Calvin E. Jenness
Calvin E. Jenness
Vice President - Corporate Controller & Treasurer
August 14, 2002
|  |  H.J. Helwerda, B.Sc., P.Eng., FEC, FGC (Hon), President D.J. Carsted, CD,  B.Sc., P.Geol.,ExecutiveVP, CTO C.P. Six, B.Sc., P.Eng., Senior VP, Unconventional N.T. Stewart, B.A.Sc., P.Eng., Senior VP, Canada S.W. Pennell, B.S., P.Eng., VP, Engineering, International A.A. Szabo, B.Sc., P.Eng., VP, Engineering, Canada B.F. Jose, M.Sc., P.Geoph., VP, Geoscience, International K.P. McDonald, B.Comm.,CA, CFO M.R. Van de Veen, QC, J.D., M.B.A., L.L.M.,                                     General Counsel, Corporate Secretary                                                |
|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Re: | Consent of Independent Petroleum Consultants |
|-----|----------------------------------------------|

| Sincerely,                                 |
|--------------------------------------------|
|                                       |
| SPROULE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED         |
|                                       |
|                                       |
| Original Signed by Nora T. Stewart, P.Eng. |
|                                       |
|                                       |
| Nora T. Stewart, P.Eng.                    |
| Senior Vice-President, Canada and Director |

----
# C_2021507EN.01000801.xml

| 16.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 507/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 507/8

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10418 – EFMS / GOLDMAN SACHS / PAREXEL)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 507/03)

On 3 November 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10418. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10418. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2165 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2165

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend for one year the 
  above-the-line deduction for qualified tuition and related expenses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 30, 2015

 Mr. Grayson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend for one year the 
  above-the-line deduction for qualified tuition and related expenses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF ABOVE-THE-LINE DEDUCTION FOR QUALIFIED TUITION 
              AND RELATED EXPENSES.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (e) of section 222 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``December 31, 2014'' and 
inserting ``December 31, 2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2014.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001018738
<NAME> COBBLESTONE TEXAS, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          11,117
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,322,054
<ALLOWANCES>                                   216,389
<INVENTORY>                                    128,191
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               675,202
<PP&E>                                      14,069,868
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,411,284
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,920,625
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          551,310
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,821,628
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,920,625
<SALES>                                      1,060,697
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,731,691
<CGS>                                          486,713
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,914,157
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                13,477
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              41,620
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                325,914
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            825,914
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   825,914
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2021370EN.01001001.xml

| 15.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 370/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 370/10

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9987 – NVIDIA/Arm)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 370/08)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | NVIDIA Corporation (‘NVIDIA’, USA), |
| --- | --- |

—

NVIDIA Corporation (‘NVIDIA’, USA),

| — | Arm Limited (‘Arm’, United Kingdom), belonging to the SoftBank Group Corp. (Japan). |
| --- | --- |

—

Arm Limited (‘Arm’, United Kingdom), belonging to the SoftBank Group Corp. (Japan).

NVIDIA acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Arm.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | for NVIDIA: design and supply of accelerated computing platforms including graphics processing units for gaming, datacentres, professional visualization, and automotive applications. Through its acquisition of Mellanox, completed in April 2020, NVIDIA also supplies network interconnect products and solutions; |
| --- | --- |

—

for NVIDIA: design and supply of accelerated computing platforms including graphics processing units for gaming, datacentres, professional visualization, and automotive applications. Through its acquisition of Mellanox, completed in April 2020, NVIDIA also supplies network interconnect products and solutions;

| — | for Arm: development and licensing of IP to semiconductor suppliers, for end-use in mobile devices, datacentre servers, automotive systems, PC and Internet-of-Things, among others. |
| --- | --- |

—

for Arm: development and licensing of IP to semiconductor suppliers, for end-use in mobile devices, datacentre servers, automotive systems, PC and Internet-of-Things, among others.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9987 — NVIDIA/Arm

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 27, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
129374 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan ANGELA MATUSCAK, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 129374 COA: 261319 Macomb CC: 04-001156-NI WALGREEN CO., Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the Ju ly 19, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

s1219 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 27, 2005

Clerk
GREEN RIVER ABOVE FONTENELLE (LA BARGE)Latitude: 42.193Longitude: -110.162Elevation: 6532

GREEN RIVER ABOVE FONTENELLE (LA BARGE)

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Pocket Creek Site Page...



Pocket Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Big Sandy Opening Site Page...



Big Sandy Opening

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Blind Bull Sum Site Page...



Blind Bull Sum

Courtesy NRCS - Go to East Rim Divide Site Page...



East Rim Divide

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Elkhart Park G.S. Site Page...



Elkhart Park G.S.

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Gros Ventre Summit Site Page...



Gros Ventre Summit

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Kendall R.S. Site Page...



Kendall R.S.

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Loomis Park Site Page...



Loomis Park

Courtesy NRCS - Go to New Fork Lake Site Page...



New Fork Lake

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Snider Basin Site Page...



Snider Basin

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Spring Creek Divide Site Page...



Spring Creek Divide

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Triple Peak Site Page...



Triple Peak

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Gunsight Pass Site Page...



Gunsight Pass
Skip to main content

Privacy Policy•Site map

# SURVEY

Thank you to those who participated in the court's Alternative Dispute Resolution Survey, which closed on August 15, 2014.

At this time, the court is not offering any surveys.  Please visit again soon for the court's next survey. 

Howard T. Markey National Courts Building • 717 Madison Place, NW, Washington, DC 20439 • 202-357-6400
IB 

Union Calendar No. 385 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1975 

[Report No. 114–505] 

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to require the Securities 

Exchange Commission to refund or credit excess payments made to 

the Commission. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 22, 2015 

Mr. MEEKS (for himself, Mr. HULTGREN, Mr. FOSTER, and Mrs. CAROLYN

B. MALONEY of New York) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

APRIL 19, 2016 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1975 RH

A BILL 

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to require 

the Securities Exchange Commission to refund or credit 

excess payments made to the Commission. 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1975 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Securities and Ex5 change Commission Overpayment Credit Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFUNDING OR CREDITING OVERPAYMENT OF SEC7 TION 31 FEES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 31 of the Securities Ex9 change Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78ee) is amended by add10 ing at the end the following: 

11 ‘‘(n) OVERPAYMENT.—If a national securities ex12 change or national securities association pays to the Com13 mission an amount in excess of fees and assessments due 

14 under this section and informs the Commission of such 

15 amount paid in excess within 10 years of the date of the 

16 payment, the Commission shall offset future fees and as17 sessments due by such exchange or association in an 

18 amount equal to such excess amount.’’. 

19 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by this 

20 section shall apply to any fees and assessments paid be21 fore, on, or after the date of enactment of this section. 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 385 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1975 

[Report No. 114–505] 

A BILL 

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to 

Commission. refund or credit excess payments made to the require the Securities Exchange Commission to 

APRIL 19, 2016 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2021514EN.01000301.xml

| 21.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 514/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 514/3

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10488 – FAURECIA / HELLA)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 514/03)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Faurecia SE (‘Faurecia’) (France), |
| --- | --- |

—

Faurecia SE (‘Faurecia’) (France),

| — | HELLA GmbH & Co. KGaA (‘Hella’) (Germany). |
| --- | --- |

—

HELLA GmbH & Co. KGaA (‘Hella’) (Germany).

Faurecia acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Hella.

The concentration is accomplished by way of public bid announced on 27 September 2021.

2.

| — | for Faurecia: the development, manufacture, and supply of components for passenger cars and light commercial vehicles. Its four main business areas are seating, interiors, clean mobility (including solutions to reduce emissions and improve energy efficiency and acoustic performance), and electronics (in-vehicle infotainment, human machine interfaces and connectivity), |
| --- | --- |

—

for Faurecia: the development, manufacture, and supply of components for passenger cars and light commercial vehicles. Its four main business areas are seating, interiors, clean mobility (including solutions to reduce emissions and improve energy efficiency and acoustic performance), and electronics (in-vehicle infotainment, human machine interfaces and connectivity),

| — | for Hella: the development and production of automotive parts, in particular lighting and electronic products. |
| --- | --- |

—

for Hella: the development and production of automotive parts, in particular lighting and electronic products.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10488 – FAURECIA / HELLA

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7361

JAMES L. MERINAR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PARKERSBURG POLICE FORCE; PARKERSBURG WELFARE

OFFICIALS; STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Parkersburg. Charles H. Haden II, Chief

District Judge. (CA-95-536-6)

Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 24, 1996

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James L. Merinar, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate

judge's recommendation, and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Merinar v.

Parkersburg Police, No. CA-95-536-6 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 21, 1995). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED