alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 

Complainant 

VS. 

DIETER P. DUBROC, 

Respondent. 

Docket Number CG S&R 03-0432 

CG Case No. 1849289 

REVOCATION ORDER 

Issued: September 14,2004 

Issued by: Peter A. Fitzpatrick, Administrative Law Jud~e 

On August 5,2004, the Investigating Officer at Marine Safety Ofice New Orleans fi led a 

Motion for Default Order, seeking revocation of the Respondent's Merchant Mariner's 

Document, which Motion is incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. 

On September 10,2004, this Suspension and Revocation proceeding was assigned to the 

undersigned Administrative Law Judge for the US. Coast Guard for adjudication of the Motion 

for Default. The matter was taken under advisement and a complete review of this case was 

made. According to the case file, a copy of the original Complaint, dated July 17,2003, was duly 

served upon the Respondent, via Certified Mail, Return Receipt, on July 22.2003. Respondent 

was charged with Use of or Addiction to the Use of Dangerous Drugs under 46 USC 7704(c). To 

date, Respondent has not filed an Answer to the original Complaint, with either the Investigating 

Officer or the Coast Guard Administrative Law Judge Docketing Center. 
Upon consideration ofthe record, I find that the Respondent is in DEFAULT. A default 

constitutes an admission of all facts alleged in the Complaint and a waiver of the Respondent's 

right to a hearing. (33 CFR $20.310) 

Accordingly, I hereby ORDER that the alleged violation of Use of or Addiction to the 

Use of Dangerous Drugs is PROVED. I have carefully reviewed the Complaint and the Motion 

for Default and find that the proposed sanction is appropriate under the provisions of 46 CFR 5 

5.569. 

SANCTION 

IT IS ORDERED that your Merchant Mariner's Docun~ent is hereby REVOKED. 

You must immediately surrender your document to the Coast Guard. If you knowingly 

continue to use your document, you may he subject to criminal prosecution. 

Under 33 CFR 20.3 10(e) for good cause shown, an Administrative Law Judge may set 

aside this finding of Default. You may file a motion to set aside the finding with the ALJ 

Docketing Center, Baltimore. 

Service of this Order of Revocation upon you serves to notify you of your right to appeal 

as set forth in 33 CFR Subpart J, Section 20.1001. (Attachment A). 

- 

~&LZ@# 

P TEK A. FITZPATRI 

Administrative Law ~udg 

United States Coast Guard 

Done and Dated on September 14,2004 at 

Norfolk, VA
#### Jose William HERRERA-GRANDE, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-73113.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 28, 2011.

Jenny Tsai, Green & Tsai, Attorneys at Law, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, OIL, Colin J. Tucker, Trial, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: FARRIS, LEAVY and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument: *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Petitioner Jose William HerreraGrande, a native and citizen of El Salva*684dor, petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the Board’s denial of asylum and withholding of removal because Herrera-Grande failed to show he was or will be subject to conduct rising to the level of persecution. *See Hoxha v. Ashcroft,*319 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2003) (holding that unfulfilled threats and an incident of physical violence did not establish past persecution).

Substantial evidence also supports the Board’s denial of asylum and withholding of removal because Herrera-Grande failed to show that gang members threatened him on account of a protected ground. His fear of future persecution based on an actual or imputed anti-gang or anti-crime opinion is not on account of the protected ground of either membership in a particular social group or political opinion. *Ramos Barrios v. Holder,*581 F.3d 849, 854-56 (9th Cir.2009); *Santos-Lemus v. Mukasey,*542 F.3d 738, 745-46 (9th Cir.2008). Moreover, being a witness to a murder does not establish the required nexus to a protected ground. *See Ochave v. INS,*254 F.3d 859, 865 (9th Cir.2001) (“Asylum generally is not available to victims of civil strife, unless they are singled out on account of a protected ground.”)

Substantial evidence also supports the Board’s denial of CAT relief based on the Board’s finding that Herrera-Grande did not establish a likelihood of torture by, at the instigation of, or with the consent or acquiescence of the El Salvadoran government. *See Arteaga v. Mukasey,*511 F.3d 940, 948-49 (9th Cir.2007).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
SCWC-15-0000951
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I
VONAH DITUS, FRED DITUS, and STONE DITUS, Respondents/Plaintiffs-Appellees,

vs. ROGER COURT and ANGELA COURT, Petitioners/Defendants-Appellants.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-15-0000951; CIVIL NO. 3SS15-1-000230)
ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Reck tenwald, C.J., Nak ayama, Mc Kenna, Po llack, an d Wilson, JJ.)

The application for writ of certiorari, filed on July 5, 2016, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, August 9, 2016. Roger and Angela Court pro se /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-15-0000951 09-AUG-2016 07:49 AM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheet as of September 30, 1997, and the Year to Date Statement of Operations for
the period then ended and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          21,111
<SECURITIES>                                    23,735
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,112
<ALLOWANCES>                                       123
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,720
<PP&E>                                           2,855
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (366)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  57,672
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,053
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           122
<OTHER-SE>                                      54,102
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    57,672
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,814
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,761
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,696
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,708
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,652)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,652)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,652)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.47)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 21


                    SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


Company (1)                                                       Jurisdiction
-----------                                                       ------------

Trigon Insurance Company (dba Trigon Blue Cross Blue Shield).....Virginia
   Primary Care First, L.L.C. (2)................................Virginia
Trigon Administrators, Inc.......................................Virginia
   HealthKeepers, Inc............................................Virginia
   Peninsula Health Care, Inc. (3)...............................Virginia
   Trigon Services, Inc..........................................Virginia
   Priority, Inc. (4)............................................Virginia
      Priority Health Care, Inc..................................Virginia
      Priority Insurance Agency, Inc.............................Virginia
Monticello Service Agency, Inc...................................Virginia
   Consolidated Holdings Corporation.............................Delaware
   Trigon Health and Life Insurance Company......................Virginia
   Health Management Corporation.................................Virginia
      Healthy Homecomings, Inc...................................Missouri
      Healthy Homecomings Incorporated of St. Louis..............Missouri
   Mid-South Insurance Company...................................North Carolina



(1)   Unless otherwise indicated, subsidiaries are 100% owned by the Registrant
      or the indicated parent company.

(2)   50% owned

(3)   51% owned

(4)   80% owned
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 230 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 230

 To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 to authorize the 
             Central Everglades Planning Project, Florida.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 8, 2015

 Mr. Murphy of Florida (for himself, Mr. Jolly, Ms. Wilson of Florida, 
Ms. Wasserman Schultz, Mr. Rooney of Florida, Mr. Hastings, Mr. Deutch, 
Mr. Posey, Ms. Brown of Florida, Mr. Crenshaw, Mr. Clawson of Florida, 
Ms. Frankel of Florida, and Ms. Graham) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 to authorize the 
             Central Everglades Planning Project, Florida.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERP, CENTRAL EVERGLADES PLANNING PROJECT, FLORIDA.

    Section 601 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (Public 
Law 106-541; 114 Stat. 2680) is amended by adding at the end the 
following new subsection:
    ``(q) CERP, Central Everglades Planning Project, Florida.--
            ``(1) Authorization.--In accordance with subsection (d), 
        the project for environmental restoration, CERP, Central 
        Everglades Planning Project, Florida, is authorized to be 
        carried out by the Secretary substantially in accordance with 
        the plans, and subject to the conditions, recommended in the 
        final report of the Chief of Engineers signed on December 23, 
        2014.
            ``(2) Total cost.--The project authorized under paragraph 
        (1) is authorized to be carried out by the Secretary at a total 
        cost of $1,900,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $950,875,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $949,125,000.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2194 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2194

To reauthorize the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program for fiscal 
            years 2016 through 2020, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 30, 2015

  Mr. Welch (for himself, Mr. King of New York, Mr. McGovern, and Mr. 
  Barletta) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 
Education and the Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined 
 by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as 
        fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To reauthorize the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program for fiscal 
            years 2016 through 2020, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Energy Assistance for American 
Families Act''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF LIHEAP.

    Section 2602(b) of the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Act of 
1981 (42 U.S.C. 8621(b)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``2001, and'' and inserting ``2001,''; and
            (2) by inserting after ``2007'' the following: ``, and 
        $5,100,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2016 through 2020. 
        Notwithstanding section 2605(b)(2)(B)(ii), a State may use any 
        allotment from funds appropriated under this subsection for 
        fiscal years 2016 through 2020 to provide assistance to 
        households whose income does not exceed 75 percent of the State 
        median income''.
                                 <all>
```
1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

_________________________________

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD,

Complainant,

vs.

FABIAN GONZALEZ,

Respondent.

_________________________________

Docket Number 2023-0445

CG Enforcement Activity Number 7826156

CONSENT ORDER

Issued: January 4, 2024

By: Honorable George J. Jordan, Administrative Law Judge

Appearances:

CWO Benjamin Morris

Sector New Orleans 

For the Coast Guard

Fabian Gonzalez , Pro se

For the Respondent
2

CONSENT ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

On December 13, 2023, the parties in this case submitted a Motion for Approval of 

Settlement Agreement and Entry of Consent Order to be approved as a settlement of the case 

under 33 C.F.R. § 20.502.

I have carefully reviewed the terms of the Settlement Agreement and find it is fair and 

reasonable and in substantial compliance with the requirements of 33 C.F.R. § 20.502.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the record, it is hereby ORDERED, the Settlement Agreement is 

APPROVED in full and incorporated herein by reference. This Consent Order shall constitute 

full, final, and complete adjudication of this proceeding.

SO ORDERED.

Done and dated January 4, 2024,

Seattle, Washington 

______________________________

George J. Jordan

Administrative Law Judge

United States Coast Guard
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of TransAct Technologies Incorporated (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Steven A. DeMartino, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: March 15, 2007


/s/ Steven A. DeMartino
------------------------------------
Steven A. DeMartino
Chief Financial Officer


                                       64
#### PEOPLE v. WONG SING.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

December 18, 1896.)

Proceeding against Wong Sing.

No opinion. Motion granted.
#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Ave Reservoir Elevation                    
csv

      Gage Height                    
csv

      Total Release                    
csv

      Average Gate 1 Opening Height                    
csv

      Pool Elevation                    
csv

      Pool Elevation (Secondary Reading)                    
csv

#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Ave Reservoir Elevation                    
json

      Gage Height                    
json

      Total Release                    
json

      Average Gate 1 Opening Height                    
json

      Pool Elevation                    
json

      Pool Elevation (Secondary Reading)                    
json
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Mark P. Mellin, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ILEX Oncology, Inc;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: November 13, 2003   /s/ Mark P. MellinMark P. MellinSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Chief Financial and Accounting Officer)
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 11.1


                               TRITEAL CORPORATION
              STATEMENT REGARDING CALCULATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      THREE MONTHS ENDED          SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                        SEPTEMBER 30,               SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                  ----------------------      ----------------------
                                                    1997          1996          1997          1996
                                                  --------      --------      --------      --------
                                                      (Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
<S>                                               <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>      
Net loss ........................................ $ (8,235)     $   (253)     $ (8,011)     $ (1,247)
                                                  ========      ========      ========      ========


 Average common shares outstanding ..............   10,952         6,517        10,896         5,015
 Adjustments to reflect requirements of the
    Securities and Exchange Commission
    (Effect of SAB 83) ..........................       --         1,138            --         1,811
 Effect of assumed conversion of Series A
    convertible preferred shares from date of
    issuance ....................................       --           332            --           528
                                                  --------      --------      --------      --------
 Adjusted shares outstanding ....................   10,952         7,987        10,896         7,354
                                                  ========      ========      ========      ========

 Net loss per share ............................. $   (.75)     $   (.03)     $   (.74)     $   (.17)
                                                  ========      ========      ========      ========
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32





SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of PacificHealth Laboratories, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Frederick Duffner, President of the Company, and Stephen P. Kuchen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on our knowledge:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





This Certification shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





DATE: May 6, 2011By:
/s/ Frederick DuffnerFrederick Duffner, President and CEO(Principal Executive Officer)DATE: May 6, 2011By:
/s/ Stephen P. KuchenStephen P. Kuchen, Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)