alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

TJNITED STATES COAST GUARI)

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

Complainant

JOSHUAM. RECTOR

Respondent

Docket Number 2023-0029

Enforcemeot Activity No.7624055

CONSENT ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

On January 27,2023, the parties in this case submitted a Motion for Approval of a

Settlement Agreement and Entry of Consent Order to be approved as a settlement of the case

under 33 C.F.R. $ 20.502.

I have carefirlly reviewed the terms of the Settlement Agreement and find that it is fair

and reasonable and in substantial compliance with the requirements of 33 C.F.R. $ 20.502.

ORDER

Upon consideration of record, it is hereby ORDERED that the Settlement Agreement is

APPROVED in full and incorporated herein by reference. This Consent Order shall constitute

firll, frnal, and complete adjudication of this proceeding.

Done and Dated X'ebruary 1,2O23 at

New Orleans, LA

f\-.

vs.

HON. BRIAN J. CURLEY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARI)

ADMINISTRATIYE LAW JUDGE
#### WHEELER, Respondent, v. WHEELER, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 12, 1897.)

Action by Julia McMahan 'Wheeler against John T. Wheeler.

No opinion. Order modified by reducing counsel fee to $75. and alimony to $5 a week, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs. All concur, except CULLEN and BARTLETT, JJ., who vote for reversal.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-30-1997
<CASH>                                            2270
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    12207
<ALLOWANCES>                                       638
<INVENTORY>                                       6611
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 21884
<PP&E>                                            2967
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1316
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   41124
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             7624
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         47188
<OTHER-SE>                                     (13716)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     41124
<SALES>                                          94440
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 94440
<CGS>                                            70615
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    15323
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (127)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 437
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   8192
<INCOME-TAX>                                      3599
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      4853
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .44
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 14, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 51182]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19802]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLNM931000.L14400000.BJ0000 212L1109AF]


Notice of Filing of Plats of Survey; Oklahoma

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Filing of Plats of Survey; Oklahoma.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On September 29, 2020, the BLM published a notice in the 
Federal Register entitled, ``Notice of Filing of Plats of Survey; New 
Mexico; Oklahoma.'' The official filing of the four Oklahoma 
supplemental plats listed below is hereby stayed, pending consideration 
of all protests.

DATES: Upon publication of this Federal Register Notice, the plats 
described below will be stayed.

ADDRESSES: These plats will be available for inspection in the New 
Mexico Office, Bureau of Land Management, 301 Dinosaur Trail, Santa Fe, 
New Mexico, 85004-4427. Protests of a survey should be sent to the New 
Mexico Director at the above address.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Michael J. Purtee, Chief Cadastral 
Surveyor; (505) 761-8903; <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f895888d8a8c9d9db89a9495d69f978e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a0cdd0d5d2d4c5c5e0c2cccd8ec7cfd6">[email protected]</span></a>. Persons who use a 
telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Relay 
Service (FRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to contact Mr. Purtee during normal 
business hours. The FRS is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to 
leave a message or question with the above individual. You will receive 
a reply during normal business hours.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Indian Meridian, Oklahoma

    The supplemental plat, within Township 10 North, Range 27 East, 
section 4, accepted July 8, 2020, for Group 224, Oklahoma.
    The supplemental plat, within Township 10 North, Range 27 East, 
section 5, accepted July 8, 2020, for Group 224, Oklahoma.
    The supplemental plat, in two sheets, within Township 10 North, 
Range 27 East, section 19, accepted August 13, 2020, for Group 223, 
Oklahoma.
    The supplemental plat, within Township 11 North, Range 27 East, 
section 33, accepted July 8, 2020, for Group 224, Oklahoma.
    The official filing of these supplemental plats is hereby stayed, 
pending consideration of all protests.
    Authority: 43 U.S.C. Chap. 3.

Michael J. Purtee,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor, BLM New Mexico.
[FR Doc. 2021-19802 Filed 9-13-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-FB-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.24

                     AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
                 ENTERED INTO ON JANUARY 1, 1995 BY AND BETWEEN
        UNIVISION TELEVISION GROUP, INC. AND GEORGE BLANK, AS AMENDED ON
   JANUARY 31, 1996, AND FURTHER AMENDED ON JANUARY 1, 1997 (THE "EMPLOYMENT 
    AGREEMENT")

                              December 22, 1997 

To:  Mr. George Blank
     c/o Univision Television Group, Inc. ("UTG")

Dear George:

     Your Employment Agreement became effective on January 1, 1995 and will 
expire on December 31, 1999 (the "Term"). UTG desires to extend the Term for 
an additional one year period. You and we hereby agree to amend the 
Employment Agreement as follows:

     1.  TERM. The Term is hereby extended for an additional one year period. 
The Employment Agreement shall expire on December 31, 2000, unless earlier 
terminated in accordance with the terms set forth in the Employment Agreement.

     2.  SALARY. Your Base Salary for calendar years 1998 and 1999 shall 
continue at the annual rate of Five Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars 
($550,000), as provided in the second amendment to the Employment Agreement. 
Your annual Base Salary rate in calendar year 2000 shall be Five Hundred 
Fifty Thousand Dollars ($550,000).

     3.  OTHER. Except as provided in this Amendment No. 3, all other terms 
and conditions set forth in the Employment Agreement shall remain in full 
force and effect, and the parties hereby ratify and confirm the Employment 
Agreement, as amended.

     4.  EFFECTIVE DATE OF AMENDMENT NO. 3. Upon its execution by you and UTG, 
this Amendment No. 3 shall become effective as of the date first written 
above.

     Please indicate your agreement to this Amendment No. 3 to the 
Employment Agreement by signing this letter amendment in the space provided 
below.

                                       UNIVISION TELEVISION GROUP, INC.

                                       By: /s/ ROBERT V. CAHILL
                                          ---------------------------
                                           Robert V. Cahill
                                           Vice President

I have read the preceding Amendment No. 3 and agree to its terms and 
conditions:

/s/ GEORGE BLANK
---------------------
    George Blank
EXHIBIT 6





October 31, 2013
   Consent of Independent Auditor
 
 
 We hereby consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report on Form 40-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2012 of Canadian Natural Resources Limited of our report dated March 6, 2013, relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Annual Report.
 
 We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form F-9 (File No. 333-177401) of Canadian Natural Resources Limited of our report dated March 6, 2013 referred to above.


SIGNED “PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP”Chartered Accountants
EXHIBIT 32

1350 CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Shirley Singleton, the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Edgewater Technology, Inc. (the Company), and
Timothy R. Oakes, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of her or his knowledge:

The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the Periodic Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the
Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.



|                     |  |                                                                              
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 15, 2010 |  | /s/ SHIRLEY SINGLETON                                                        
|                     |  | Shirley Singleton                                                            
|                     |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
|                     | 
|Date: March 15, 2010 |  | /s/ TIMOTHY R. OAKES                                                         
|                     |  | Timothy R. Oakes                                                             
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)         

A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Bopp *v.*Atkins.

*(Common Pleas of New York, City and County, General Term,.*

June 2, 1890.)

Evidence—Parol to Affect Writing.

Tn an action to recover the value of certain carpets, gas fixtures, etc., alleged to have been conveyed to plaintiff with a house, but which were not referred to in the written contract of sale, evidence of conversations had before the signing of the contract concerning such articles is .inadmissible.

Appeal from eleventh district court.

Action by Jacob Bopp against James I. Atkins. Judgment was given for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

Argued before Larremore, C. J., and Bookstaver, J.

*C. B. Smith,*for appellant. *A. Lamont,*for respondent.

Bookstaver, J.

Action to recover the value of certain chattels alleged by the plaintiff to have been conveyed by the defendant to him with a house and lot in West Forty-Fourth street. The contract of sale was in writing, and at the time of its execution something was said about certain articles, as carpets, gas fixtures, etc.; but when the contract was drawn up it entirely omitted any reference to these articles. Nevertheless, on the trial, plaintiff was allowed to give evidence as to the conversation before the signing of the contract, and judgment was rendered in plaintiff’s favor for their value. This we think was error. The rule was elementary. When the parties, deliberately put their agreement in writing in such terms as import a legal obligation, without any uncertainty as to the object or extent of such engagements, it is conclusively presumed that the whole engagement of the parties, and the extent and manner of their undertaking, was reduced to writing, and all oral testimony of particular conversations should be rejected. 1 Greenl. Ev. §§ 275, 276. From the evidence admitted it seems clear that the carpets, etc., were intended to go with the house; but they were not included in the contract, and the plaintiff has mistaken his remedy, which should have been an action to reform the contract. The judgment should therefore be reversed, with costs.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

K. DEAN KANTARAS, ESQ., BCS and K. DEAN KANTARAS, P.A.,

Appellants,

v.

JASON ALAN DATTISMAN,

Appellee.

No. 2D23-510

January 12, 2024

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Joshua Riba, Judge.

K. Dean Kantaras of K. Dean Kantaras, P.A., Palm Harbor, for 

Appellants.

Jason A. Dattisman, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KELLY, MORRIS, and LABRIT, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2258 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2258

To amend section 320301 of title 54, United States Code, to modify the 
  authority of the President of the United States to declare national 
                   monuments, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 2015

   Mr. Buck (for himself, Mr. Gosar, Mr. Hensarling, Mr. Cook, Mrs. 
   Lummis, and Mr. Pearce) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend section 320301 of title 54, United States Code, to modify the 
  authority of the President of the United States to declare national 
                   monuments, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO AUTHORITY TO DECLARE NATIONAL MONUMENTS.

    Section 320301 of title 54, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(e) Effective Date.--A proclamation or reservation under 
subsection (a) or (b) shall expire 3 years after proclaimed or reserved 
unless specifically approved by--
            ``(1) a Federal law enacted after the date of the 
        proclamation or reservation; and
            ``(2) a State law, for each State where the land covered by 
        the proclamation or reservation is located, enacted after the 
        date of the proclamation or reservation.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Margaret Tancos, Respondent, v Centaur Insurance Company, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

In an action for reformation of a multiperil policy of insurance covering a certain premises, the defendant Centaur Insurance Company appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Weiner, J.), dated October 28, 1986, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff commenced this action, after fire destroyed the premises in question, seeking reformation of an insurance policy issued by the defendant insurer which names the defendant Alamo Enterprises, Inc., lessee of the premises, as the sole insured. She alleged that the policy as issued did not express the intentions of the parties that Margaret and Jack Tañeos be named as mortgagees under a standard mortgagee clause.

After issue was joined, and prior to the conducting of examinations before trial of the parties to the agreement, the insurer moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the grounds that there was no merit to the plaintiff’s claim of mutual mistake and that there were no triable issues of fact. In support of its motion, the insurer submitted an attorney’s affidavit with certain exhibits annexed, and copies of the pleadings. No affidavits were submitted from the parties who were involved in the procurement of the policy who had personal knowledge of the facts pertinent to the plaintiff’s claim of mutual mistake. Instead, the insurer included as exhibits and relied upon excerpts from the preaction examina*623tions under oath conducted solely by the insurer of the insurance broker and the defendant Robert Angona, upon whose application the policy was apparently issued. It is noteworthy that these excerpts are neither signed by the examinees nor notarized.

On this record, we find that the insurer failed to sustain its burden of setting forth evidentiary proof in admissible form sufficient to demonstrate its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law *(Krupp v Aetna Life & Cas. Co.,*103 AD2d 252). A material issue of fact exists as to whether the policy reflects the intentions of the parties to the agreement. Also, considering the nature of this action, the particular facts of this case, and the plaintiffs lack of opportunity to complete examinations before trial of the parties to the agreement, the Supreme Court, Rockland County, properly denied the insurer’s motion for summary judgment. Weinstein, J. P., Rubin, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.
# C_2021461EN.01000101.xml

| 15.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 461/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 461/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10357 – VINCI / EIFFAGE / SMTPC)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 461/01)

On 25 October 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10357. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10357. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
No. PD-1102-15 BENITO GARZA § Appellant/Petitioner IN THE COURT OF § V. CRIMINAL APPEALS §.- THE STATE OF TEXAS OF TEXAS 

### Appellee/Respondent §



### COURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS Respectfully, 

### NOV022015 ^ftjrsJZQ77^ Benito Garza #1957! 

### A. , 3001 S. Emily Dr. 

### AbelACQSta, Clerk Beeville, TX 78102 DCOnur 

## COURTOFCRMLAPPFALS PRO SE MOTION TO SUSPEND T.R.A.P. RULE 9.3(b)(1). 

### NUMBER OF COPIES [.OV 022015 Abe!Anes^aGls*k TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS: COMES NOW/ Appellant/Petitioner pro se, and respectfully moves this Honorable Court to suspend T.R.A.P. Rule 9.3(b)(1) number of 

### copies and allow the filing of the original only. And in support would show the following: 

### Appellant/Petitioner is incarcerated at the McConnell Unit in Beeville, TX. At this time, T.D.C.J.-ID does not provide copy services for offenders. Appellant/Petitioner has no outside 

### help to obtain the number of copies required by Rule 9.3(b)(1). It is therefore impossible for Appellant/PPetitioner to generate the number of copies required in a legible form. WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant/Petitioner humbly 

### prays this Honorable Court will GRANT this motion suspending Rule 9.3(b)(1) and allow the filing of one copy of the Original 

### Petition-jfejjjkDiscretionary Review.CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

### The undersigned Appellant/Petitioner hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing motion to suspend TRAP Rule 9.3(b)(1) has been mailed to the District Attorney^ Office U.S.mail, postage prepaid, at Paul Elizondo Tower, 101 W.Nueva St. San Antonio, TX 78205. And also a copy has been forwrded to the 

### Office of the State Prosecuting Attorney, Attn.Lisa C.McMinn, 

# P.O. Box 12405, AustinTX, 78711. On this ^fcdayof October,

2015.

nito Garza