alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael McGinn, Appellant.

[946 NYS2d 489]

— Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (R. Doyle, J.), rendered January 24, 2011, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that he had violated conditions thereof, upon his admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of operating a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, as a felony, and aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the Supreme Court improperly sentenced him without obtaining an updated presentence report is unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Gledhill,*91 AD3d 886 [2012]; *People v Mannina,*89 AD3d 1038 [2011]; *People v Thompson,*65 AD3d 1390 [2009]) and, in any event, is without merit *(see People v Kuey,*83 NY2d 278, 282-283 [1994]; *People v Cannon,*208 AD2d 942, 943 [1994] ; *People v Jackson,*106 AD2d 93, 98 [1984]).

*978The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that his sentence should be vacated because the Supreme Court did not afford either the prosecutor or defense counsel the opportunity to make a statement with respect to the sentence and did not ask the defendant if he wished to make a statement in his own behalf, in violation of CPL 380.50 (1) *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v McCant,*79 AD3d 908 [2010]; *People v Chin,*69 AD3d 752, 753 [2010]; *People v Chi Fong Chen,*56 AD3d 488, 489 [2008]), and the contention is, in any event, without merit *(see People v McClain,*35 NY2d 483, 491 [1974], *cert denied*423 US 852 [1975]; *People v Regan,*88 AD2d 664 [1982]). Rivera, J.P., Eng, Chambers, Sgroi and Miller, JJ., concur.
MUDDY CREEK ABOVE PAONIA RESERVOIR NEAR PAONIA, COLatitude: 38.988Longitude: -107.349Elevation: 9788

MUDDY CREEK ABOVE PAONIA RESERVOIR NEAR PAONIA, CO

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Mc Clure Pass Site Page...



Mc Clure Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to North Lost Trail Site Page...



North Lost Trail

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Overland Res. Site Page...



Overland Res.
dgdm_ex101.htm

EXHIBIT 10.1
  
 
  
 	 
	1
	

	 

  
 
  
 	 
	2
	

	 

  
 
  
 	 
	3
	

	 

  
 
 	 
	4
# C_2021215EN.01000301.xml

| 7.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 215/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 215/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10233 — Clearlake/TA Associates/Charlesbank/Ivanti)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 215/03)

On 6 May 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10233. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10233. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### Jean L. Weber, Appellant, v Russell J. Bellinger et al., Respondents.

After commencement of an action for personal injuries, plaintiff died. That event terminated her attorney’s authority to act and stayed the proceedings pending substitution of a legal representative (CPLR 1015; *Matter of Einstoss,*26 NY2d 181; *Silvagnoli v Consolidated Edison Employees Mut. Aid Socy.,*112 AD2d 819). No administrator was appointed for the estate, and after almost two years defendants moved for dismissal on the ground that substitution was not made within a reasonable time. Special Term granted that motion without complying with the directive that notice first be given to those interested in decedent’s estate to show cause why dismissal should not be granted (CPLR 1021). Accordingly, the court lacked jurisdiction, and its order is a nullity *(see, Silvagnoli v Consolidated Edison Employees Mut. Aid Socy., supra; Dorney v Reddy,*45 AD2d 754). This dismissal does not preclude an application to have a representative substituted for plaintiff, nor does it preclude a new motion at Special Term *1010for the relief which defendants seek after such substitution or upon proper notice to those interested in plaintiff’s estate. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Herkimer County, Aloi, J. — dismiss complaint.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Boomer and Schnepp, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richard Vance Williams, Appellant.

Memorandum: The fact that defendant was acquitted of the first degree rape and sodomy charges, the most serious crimes charged in the indictment, but was convicted of the lesser offense of attempted promoting prostitution second and attempted coercion belies any claim of ineffective assistance of counsel *(see, People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137, 147). Such a verdict is not repugnant *(see generally, People v Tucker,*55 NY2d 1, 6; *see also, People v Collins,*92 AD2d 740). The elements of the crimes of rape in the first degree and sodomy in the first degree differ significantly from the elements of attempted promoting prostitution second and attempted coercion second. It is reasonable for the jury to have found that defendant did not use forcible compulsion to make the victim engage in sexual intercourse and deviate sexual intercourse with him, but that he did use nude photographs of her in an attempt to blackmail and coerce her into working for him as a prostitute.

The prosecutor had laid the proper foundation for asking defense witness Delinda Bell on cross-examination why she had not related to the Grand Jury the conversation in which *994the complainant had allegedly offered to "sell her body” *(see, People v Dawson,*50 NY2d 311, 321, n 4). The other claims of error were not properly preserved for appellate review or are without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga County Court, Mordue, J. — attempted prostitution, second degree, and attempted coercion, second degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Boomer, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
#### GOLDMAN. Appellant, v. LEVY et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

September, 1896.)

Action by Benjamin Goldman against Isaac Levy and others.

Hays & Greenbaum, for appellant.

Ritch & Woodford, for respondents.

No opinion. Affirmed upon argument.
TJNITED STATES OF AMERICA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARI)

vs

EDDIBERTO MARQUEZ

Respondent

Dockct Number 2023-0026

Enforccment Activity No.7604571

CONSENT ORDER APPROYING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

On January 27,2023, the parties in this case submitted a Motion for Approval of a

Settlement Agreement and Entry ofConsent Order to be approved as a settlement ofthe case

under 33 C.F.R. $ 20.502.

I have carefully reviewed the terms of the Settlement Agreement and find that it is fair

and reasonable and in substantial compliance with the requirements of 33 C.F.R. $ 20.502.

ORDER

Upon consideration of record, it is hereby ORDERED that the Settlement Agreement is

APPROVED in firll and incorporated herein by reference. This Consent Order shall constitute

flIl, find, and complete adjudication of this proceeding.

Done and Dated February 1,2O23 at

New Orleans, LA

HON. BRIAN J. CURLEY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARI)

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

Complainant
EXHIBIT
13.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of RADCOM Ltd. (the “Company”)
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Ripstein, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




1.  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
June 18, 2009




/s/
      David RipsteinDavid
      RipsteinChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

_________________________________

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD,

Complainant

vs.

RYAN JASON GALLAGHER,

Respondent.

_________________________________

Docket Number 2023-0444

Enforcement Activity No. 7821113

CONSENT ORDER

Issued: December 21, 2023

By Administrative Law Judge: Honorable Timothy G. Stueve

Appearances:

Carolina C.T. Helmke

Sector Honolulu

For the Coast Guard

Ryan Jason Gallagher, Pro Se

For Respondent
CONSENT ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

On or about December 7, 2023, the parties in this case submitted a Motion for Approval 

of Settlement Agreement and Entry of Consent Order to be approved as a settlement of the case 

under 33 C.F.R. § 20.502.

I have carefully reviewed the terms of the Settlement Agreement and find it is fair and 

reasonable and in substantial compliance with the requirements of 33 C.F.R. § 20.502.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the record, it is hereby ORDERED, the Settlement Agreement is 

APPROVED in full and incorporated herein by reference. This Consent Order shall constitute 

full, final, and complete adjudication of this proceeding.

Done and dated December 21, 2023, at

Alameda, California

 

_____________________

Timothy G. Stueve

Administrative Law Judge

U.S. Coast Guard
----

|   | 1. | The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |    /s/  Robert C. Bateman |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   | Robert C. Bateman                                  |
|   | Chief Financial Officer                            |
|   | May 3, 2010                                        |

----
Exhibit 32.1



Dover Motorsports, Inc.

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual
Report of Dover Motorsports, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Denis
McGlynn, President and Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: March 10, 2004



|                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Denis McGlynn                                 
|Denis McGlynn                                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer and Director



This certification
shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.
EXHIBIT
32.1





Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and  Chief Financial Officer


pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


regarding Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
officer of a Texas corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify
that:





1.  The
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal period ended September
30, 2009, (the Form 10Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.  Information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.














Date:           November 16,
2009


By:              /s/ Steven L.
Sample


Steven L. Sample


Chief
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
#### THOMAS v. LENNON.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 13, 1896.)

Action by John Thomas, as administrator, etc., against William F. Lennon.

•No opinion. Motion denied,=with $10 costs. See supra.
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of China Kangtai Cactus Bio-Tech, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Hong Bu, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
April 15, 2010





/s/
      Hong BuHong Bu Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
# C_2021470EN.01000201.xml

| 22.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 470/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 470/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10446 – SWISS LIFE HOLDING / GELSENWASSER / INFRAREAL)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 470/02)

On 8 November 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10446. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10446. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2163 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend for one year the 

deduction of State and local general sales taxes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 30, 2015 

Mr. GRAYSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

for one year the deduction of State and local general 

sales taxes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEDUCTION OF STATE AND 

4 LOCAL GENERAL SALES TAXES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (I) of section 

6 164(b)(5) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amend7 ed by striking ‘‘January 1, 2015’’ and inserting ‘‘January 

8 1, 2016’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2163 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 December 31, 2014. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2021301EN.01000901.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 28.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/9 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10260 — Lactalis/Leerdammer)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 301/07)

1.

On 22 July 2021, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration, pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2021301EN.01000901-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Lactalis Group (‘Lactalis’, France); and |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | La Cible (‘Leerdammer’, Netherlands) [(2)](#ntr2-C_2021301EN.01000901-E0002). |

Lactalis acquires, within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation, sole control of the whole of Leerdammer.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Lactalis: production and distribution of milk and dairy products, in particular cheeses, cream, butter, desserts and extra-fresh dairy products; and |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Leerdammer: production and distribution of cheeses under the ‘Leerdammer’ brand. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit any observations they may have on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission no later than ten days following the date on which this notification is published. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10260 — Lactalis/Leerdammer

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2021301EN.01000901-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2021301EN.01000901-E0002)  La Cible comprises a set of assets of the Bel Group (Royal Bel Leerdammer, Bel Italia, Bel Deutschland and the Ukrainian business of the Bel Group, Bel Shostka Ukraine), whose main activity is the production and sale of cheeses under the Leerdammer brand.

---
# C_2021143EN.01000101.xml

| 23.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10090 — Abu Dhabi Developmental Holding Company/Louis Dreyfus Commodities and Energy Holdings/Louis Dreyfus)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 143/01)

On 7 April 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10090. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10090. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
# C_2021459EN.01000701.xml

| 12.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 459/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 459/7

---

CONSUMERS, HEALTH, AGRICULTURE AND FOOD EXECUTIVE AGENCY

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2020

(2021/C 459/07)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://hadea.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2021-10/2020_Final%20annual%20accounts.docx.pdf

---