# L_2010035EN.01001101.xml

| 6.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 35/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 35/11

---

COMMISSION DECISION

of 4 February 2010

on the clearance of the accounts of certain paying agencies in Greece, Malta, Portugal and Finland concerning expenditure financed by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) for the 2007 financial year

(notified under document C(2010) 474)

(Only the Finnish, Greek, Maltese, Portuguese and Swedish texts are authentic)

(2010/62/EU)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 of 21 June 2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy (1), and in particular Articles 30 and 32(8) thereof,

After consulting the Committee on the Agricultural Funds,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Decisions 2008/396/EC (2) and 2009/87/EC (3) cleared, for the 2007 financial year, the accounts of all the paying agencies except for the Greek paying agency ‘OPEKEPE’, the Italian paying agency ‘ARBEA’, the Maltese paying agency ‘MRAE’, the Portuguese paying agencies ‘IFADAP’ and ‘IFAP’ and the Finnish paying agency ‘MAVI’. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Decisions 2008/396/EC (2) and 2009/87/EC (3) cleared, for the 2007 financial year, the accounts of all the paying agencies except for the Greek paying agency ‘OPEKEPE’, the Italian paying agency ‘ARBEA’, the Maltese paying agency ‘MRAE’, the Portuguese paying agencies ‘IFADAP’ and ‘IFAP’ and the Finnish paying agency ‘MAVI’.

| (2) | Following the transmission of new information and after additional checks, the Commission can now take a decision on the integrality, accuracy and veracity of the accounts submitted by the Greek paying agency ‘OPEKEPE’ the Maltese paying agency ‘MRAE’, the Portuguese paying agencies ‘IFADAP’ and ‘IFAP’ and the Finnish paying agency ‘MAVI’. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Following the transmission of new information and after additional checks, the Commission can now take a decision on the integrality, accuracy and veracity of the accounts submitted by the Greek paying agency ‘OPEKEPE’ the Maltese paying agency ‘MRAE’, the Portuguese paying agencies ‘IFADAP’ and ‘IFAP’ and the Finnish paying agency ‘MAVI’.

| (3) | The first subparagraph of Article 10(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 885/2006 of 21 June 2006 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 as regards the accreditation of paying agencies and other bodies and the clearance of the accounts of the EAGF and of the EAFRD (4) lays down that the amounts that are recoverable from, or payable to, each Member State, in accordance with the accounts clearance decision referred to in the first subparagraph of Article 10(1) of the said Regulation, shall be determined by deducting advances paid during the financial year in question, i.e. 2007, from expenditure recognised for that year in accordance with paragraph 1. Such amounts are to be deducted from, or added to, the advances against expenditure from the second month following that in which the accounts clearance decision is taken. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The first subparagraph of Article 10(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 885/2006 of 21 June 2006 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 as regards the accreditation of paying agencies and other bodies and the clearance of the accounts of the EAGF and of the EAFRD (4) lays down that the amounts that are recoverable from, or payable to, each Member State, in accordance with the accounts clearance decision referred to in the first subparagraph of Article 10(1) of the said Regulation, shall be determined by deducting advances paid during the financial year in question, i.e. 2007, from expenditure recognised for that year in accordance with paragraph 1. Such amounts are to be deducted from, or added to, the advances against expenditure from the second month following that in which the accounts clearance decision is taken.

| (4) | Pursuant to Article 32(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005, 50 % of the financial consequences of non-recovery of irregularities shall be borne by the Member State concerned and 50 % by the Community budget if the recovery of those irregularities has not taken place within 4 years of the primary administrative or judicial finding, or within 8 years if the recovery is taken to the national courts. Article 32(3) of the said Regulation obliges Member States to submit to the Commission, together with the annual accounts, a summary report on the recovery procedures undertaken in response to irregularities. Detailed rules on the application of the Member States' reporting obligation of the amounts to be recovered are laid down in Regulation (EC) No 885/2006. Annex III to the said Regulation provides the model tables 1 and 2 that have to be provided in 2008 by the Member States. On the basis of the tables completed by the Member States, the Commission should decide on the financial consequences of non-recovery of irregularities older than 4 or 8 years respectively. This Decision is without prejudice to future conformity decisions pursuant to Article 32(8) of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Pursuant to Article 32(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005, 50 % of the financial consequences of non-recovery of irregularities shall be borne by the Member State concerned and 50 % by the Community budget if the recovery of those irregularities has not taken place within 4 years of the primary administrative or judicial finding, or within 8 years if the recovery is taken to the national courts. Article 32(3) of the said Regulation obliges Member States to submit to the Commission, together with the annual accounts, a summary report on the recovery procedures undertaken in response to irregularities. Detailed rules on the application of the Member States' reporting obligation of the amounts to be recovered are laid down in Regulation (EC) No 885/2006. Annex III to the said Regulation provides the model tables 1 and 2 that have to be provided in 2008 by the Member States. On the basis of the tables completed by the Member States, the Commission should decide on the financial consequences of non-recovery of irregularities older than 4 or 8 years respectively. This Decision is without prejudice to future conformity decisions pursuant to Article 32(8) of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005.

| (5) | Pursuant to Article 32(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005, Member States may decide not to pursue recovery. Such a decision may only be taken if the costs already and likely to be incurred total more than the amount to be recovered or if the recovery proves impossible owing to the insolvency, recorded and recognised under national law, of the debtor or the persons legally responsible for the irregularity. If that decision has been taken within 4 years of the primary administrative or judicial finding or within 8 years if the recovery is taken to the national courts, 100 % of the financial consequences of the non-recovery should be borne by the Community budget. In the summary report referred to in Article 32(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 the amounts for which the Member State decided not to pursue recovery and the grounds for the decision are shown. These amounts are not charged to the Member States concerned and are consequently to be borne by the Community budget. This Decision is without prejudice to future conformity decisions pursuant to Article 32(8) of the said Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

Pursuant to Article 32(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005, Member States may decide not to pursue recovery. Such a decision may only be taken if the costs already and likely to be incurred total more than the amount to be recovered or if the recovery proves impossible owing to the insolvency, recorded and recognised under national law, of the debtor or the persons legally responsible for the irregularity. If that decision has been taken within 4 years of the primary administrative or judicial finding or within 8 years if the recovery is taken to the national courts, 100 % of the financial consequences of the non-recovery should be borne by the Community budget. In the summary report referred to in Article 32(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 the amounts for which the Member State decided not to pursue recovery and the grounds for the decision are shown. These amounts are not charged to the Member States concerned and are consequently to be borne by the Community budget. This Decision is without prejudice to future conformity decisions pursuant to Article 32(8) of the said Regulation.

| (6) | In clearing the accounts of the paying agencies concerned, the Commission must take account of the amounts already withheld from the Member States concerned on the basis of Decisions 2008/396/EC and 2009/87/EC. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

In clearing the accounts of the paying agencies concerned, the Commission must take account of the amounts already withheld from the Member States concerned on the basis of Decisions 2008/396/EC and 2009/87/EC.

| (7) | In accordance with Article 30(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005, this Decision does not prejudice decisions taken subsequently by the Commission excluding from Community financing expenditure not effected in accordance with Community rules, |
| --- | --- |

(7)

In accordance with Article 30(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005, this Decision does not prejudice decisions taken subsequently by the Commission excluding from Community financing expenditure not effected in accordance with Community rules,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The accounts of the Greek paying agency ‘OPEKEPE’, the Maltese paying agency ‘MRAE’, the Portuguese paying agencies ‘IFADAP’ and ‘IFAP’ and the Finnish paying agency ‘MAVI’ concerning expenditure financed by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF), in respect of the 2007 financial year, are hereby cleared.

The amounts which are recoverable from, or payable to, each Member State concerned pursuant to this Decision, including those resulting from the application of Article 32(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005, are set out in the Annex.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Republic of Greece, the Republic of Malta, the Portuguese Republic and the Republic of Finland.

Done at Brussels, 4 February 2010.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 209, 11.8.2005, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 139, 29.5.2008, p. 33.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 33, 3.2.2009, p. 38.

3

(4)  
  OJ L 171, 23.6.2006, p. 90.

4

---

ANNEX

CLEARANCE OF THE PAYING AGENCIES' ACCOUNTS

FINANCIAL YEAR 2007

AMOUNT TO BE RECOVERED FROM OR PAID TO THE MEMBER STATE

Note: Nomenclature 2010: 05 07 01 06, 05 02 16 02, 6701, 6702, 6803.

| MS | | 2007 — Expenditure/Assigned Revenue for the Paying Agencies for which the accounts are | Total a + b | Reductions and suspensions for the whole financial year | Reductions according to Article 32 of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 (1) | Total including reductions and suspensions | Payments made to the Member State for the financial year | Amount to be recovered from (–) or paid to (+) the Member State | Amount recovered from (–) or paid to (+) the Member State under Decision 2008/396/EC | Amount recovered from (–) or paid to (+) the Member State under Decision 2009/87/EC | Amount to be recovered from (–) or paid to (+) the Member State (2) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| cleared | disjoined |
| = expenditure / assigned revenue declared in the annual declaration | = total of the expenditure / assigned revenue in the monthly declarations |
| | | a | b | c = a + b | d | e | f = c + d + e | g | h = f – g | i | i' | j = h – i – i' |
| EL | EUR | 2 377 709 692,71 | 0,00 | 2 377 709 692,71 | –3 777 975,35 | –5 925 969,19 | 2 368 005 748,17 | 2 374 149 976,67 | –6 144 228,50 | 0,00 | 0,00 | –6 144 228,50 |
| MT | EUR | 1 968 874,78 | 0,00 | 1 968 874,78 | –16 690,38 | 0,00 | 1 952 184,40 | 1 953 932,59 | –1 748,19 | 0,00 | 0,00 | –1 748,19 |
| PT | EUR | 718 788 155,94 | 0,00 | 718 788 155,94 | – 283 116,74 | – 210 898,70 | 718 294 140,50 | 717 209 444,82 | 1 084 695,68 | 0,00 | 295 352,51 | 789 343,17 |
| FI | EUR | 579 761 052,62 | 0,00 | 579 761 052,62 | –1 768 694,94 | –17 427,95 | 577 974 929,73 | 577 803 602,60 | 171 327,13 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 171 327,13 |

MS

2007 — Expenditure/Assigned Revenue for the Paying Agencies for which the accounts are

Total a + b

Reductions and suspensions for the whole financial year

Reductions according to Article 32 of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 (1)

Total including reductions and suspensions

Payments made to the Member State for the financial year

Amount to be recovered from (–) or paid to (+) the Member State

Amount recovered from (–) or paid to (+) the Member State under Decision 2008/396/EC

Amount recovered from (–) or paid to (+) the Member State under Decision 2009/87/EC

Amount to be recovered from (–) or paid to (+) the Member State (2)

cleared

disjoined

= expenditure / assigned revenue declared in the annual declaration

= total of the expenditure / assigned revenue in the monthly declarations

a

b

c = a + b

d

e

f = c + d + e

g

h = f – g

i

i'

j = h – i – i'

EL

EUR

2 377 709 692,71

0,00

2 377 709 692,71

–3 777 975,35

–5 925 969,19

2 368 005 748,17

2 374 149 976,67

–6 144 228,50

0,00

0,00

–6 144 228,50

MT

EUR

1 968 874,78

0,00

1 968 874,78

–16 690,38

0,00

1 952 184,40

1 953 932,59

–1 748,19

0,00

0,00

–1 748,19

PT

EUR

718 788 155,94

0,00

718 788 155,94

– 283 116,74

– 210 898,70

718 294 140,50

717 209 444,82

1 084 695,68

0,00

295 352,51

789 343,17

FI

EUR

579 761 052,62

0,00

579 761 052,62

–1 768 694,94

–17 427,95

577 974 929,73

577 803 602,60

171 327,13

0,00

0,00

171 327,13

| MS | | Expenditure (3) | Assigned revenue (3) | Sugar Fund | Article 32 (=e) | Total (=h) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Expenditure (4) | Assigned revenue (4) |
| 05 07 01 06 | 6701 | 05 02 16 02 | 6803 | 6702 |
| i | j | k | l | m | n = i + j + k + l + m |
| EL | EUR | – 218 259,31 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | –5 925 969,19 | –6 144 228,50 |
| MT | EUR | –1 682,32 | –65,87 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | –1 748,19 |
| PT | EUR | 1 000 241,87 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | – 210 898,70 | 789 343,17 |
| FI | EUR | 189 819,66 | –1 064,58 | 0,00 | 0,00 | –17 427,95 | 171 327,13 |

MS

Expenditure (3)

Assigned revenue (3)

Sugar Fund

Article 32 (=e)

Total (=h)

Expenditure (4)

Assigned revenue (4)

05 07 01 06

6701

05 02 16 02

6803

6702

i

j

k

l

m

n = i + j + k + l + m

EL

EUR

– 218 259,31

0,00

0,00

0,00

–5 925 969,19

–6 144 228,50

MT

EUR

–1 682,32

–65,87

0,00

0,00

0,00

–1 748,19

PT

EUR

1 000 241,87

0,00

0,00

0,00

– 210 898,70

789 343,17

FI

EUR

189 819,66

–1 064,58

0,00

0,00

–17 427,95

171 327,13

---

(1)  The reductions and suspensions are those taken into account in the payment system, to which are added in particular the corrections for the non respect of payment deadlines established in August, September and October 2008.

(2)  For the calculation of the amount to be recovered from or paid to the Member State the amount taken into account is, the total of the annual declaration for the expenditure cleared (column a), or the total of the monthly declarations for the expenditure disjoined (column b). Applicable exchange rate: Article 7(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 883/2006.

(3)  If the Assigned revenue part would be in advantage of Member State, it has to be declared under 05 07 01 06.

(4)  If the Assigned revenue part of the Sugar Fund, would be in the advantage of the Member State, it has to be declared under 05 02 16 02.

Note: Nomenclature 2010: 05 07 01 06, 05 02 16 02, 6701, 6702, 6803.

---