alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




         In connection with the quarterly report of Classic Bancshares, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David B. Barbour, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:   November 13, 2002             /s/ David B. Barbour
        -----------------             ------------------------------------------
                                          David B. Barbour
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2021066EN.01003701.xml

| 26.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 66/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 66/37

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10004 — EQT/Zentricity/Cajelo/Recipharm)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 66/07)

On 10 February 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10004. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10004. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
RIO GRANDE CONVEYANCE CHANNEL AT SAN MARCIAL, NMLatitude: 33.688Longitude: -106.993Elevation: 4471

RIO GRANDE CONVEYANCE CHANNEL AT SAN MARCIAL, NM
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
              THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED
              FROM SALES ONLINE DIRECT,  INC.'S ANNUAL FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS FOR
              THE YEAR ENDED  DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
              BY  REFERENCE  TO  SUCH  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  CONTAINED  IN FORM
              10-KSB.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001017655
<NAME>                        SALES ONLINE DIRECT, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLAR

<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                         1
<CASH>                                            221,213
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      48,682
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                       629,729
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  983,852
<PP&E>                                            699,504
<DEPRECIATION>                                     86,139
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  1,665,649
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             429,987
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           46,711
<OTHER-SE>                                      1,188,951
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    1,665,649
<SALES>                                         1,003,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                1,003,200
<CGS>                                             706,488
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   2,459,743
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  112,710
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,183,040)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,183,040)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,183,040)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.05)




</TABLE>
*Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 29, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 06-20734

_____________________ In Re: In the Matter of the Petition of DAVID & COLLEEN INC., as Owner of the Towing Vessel David & Colleen and Taira Lynn Inc. as Owner Pro Hoc Vice for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability

---------------------------- TAIRA LYNN INC., Petitioner - Appellant,
versus SEARIVER MARITIME INC., Claimant - Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston

_________________________________________________________________ Before JOLLY, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * AFFIRMED. See 5TH C IR . R. 47.6.
# C_2021147EN.01000101.xml

| 26.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 147/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 147/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10060 — Francisco Partners/Marlin Equity Partners/Conan Holdco)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 147/01)

On 11 February 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10060. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10060. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
EXHIBIT 7
                                                                       ---------



                                  CERTIFICATION

          CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY RULE 13A-14(b) AND SECTION 1350 OF
                CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

In connection with the report of Canadian Natural Resources Limited. (the
"Company") on the Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

DATED this 23rd day of April, 2004.


/s/ John G. Langille
------------------------------
John G. Langille
President (Principal Executive Officer),
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
J'f' tl

TINITED STATES OF AMERICA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARI)

ll

rl

T]NITED STATES COAST GUARD

Complainant

vs.

RYAN SHANE BONNER

Respondent

Docket Number 2023-01 50

Enforcement Activity No. 7655320

CONSENT ORDER

Issued: August 8, 2023

By Administrative Law Judge: Honorable Timothy G. Stueve

Appearances:

For the Coast Guard

LT Nicholas Capuzzi

USCG MSD Homer

Jennifer Mehaffey, Esq.

USCG S&R National Center of Expertise

For the Respondent

Carl Marrone, Esq.

National Security Law Firm

I
On August 8, 2023, the parties in this case submitted a Motion for Approval of a

Settlement Agreement and Entry of Consent Order to the Administrative Law Judge for

under 33 C.F.R. $ 20.502.

I have carefully reviewed the terms of the Settlement Agreement and

reasonable, and in substantial compliance with the requirements of33 C.F.R. $ 20.502.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the record, it is hereby ORDERED that the Settlement

is APPRO\TD in full and incorporated herein by reference. This Consent Order shall

constitute full, final, and complete adjudication of this proceeding.

SO ORDERED.

Done and dated on this 86 day ofAugust 2023, at

Alameda, Califomia

Timothy G.

Administrative Judge

U.S. Coast

find that it

2

-

fair,
#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Storage                    
csv

      Inflow                    
csv

      Total Release                    
csv

      Pool Elevation                    
csv

      Evaporation                    
csv

      Delta Storage                    
csv

      Area                    
csv

      Release Volume                    
csv

      Inflow Volume                    
csv

#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Storage                    
json

      Inflow                    
json

      Total Release                    
json

      Pool Elevation                    
json

      Evaporation                    
json

      Delta Storage                    
json

      Area                    
json

      Release Volume                    
json

      Inflow Volume                    
json
# C_2009245EN.01001801.xml

| 13.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/18

---

COUNCIL DECISION

COUNCIL DECISION

of 9 October 2009

appointing two alternate members of the Governing Board of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions

2009/C 245/07

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1365/75 of 26 May 1975 on the creation of a European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (1), and in particular Article 6 thereof,

1

Having regard to the lists of nominees submitted by the Governments of the Member States and by the workers’ and employers’ organisations,

Whereas:

| (1) | By its Decision of 24 November 2007 (2) the Council appointed the full members and alternate members of the Administrative Board of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions for the period from 1 December 2007 to 30 November 2010, with exception of certain alternate members including Spanish and Dutch alternate members. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By its Decision of 24 November 2007 (2) the Council appointed the full members and alternate members of the Administrative Board of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions for the period from 1 December 2007 to 30 November 2010, with exception of certain alternate members including Spanish and Dutch alternate members.

2

| (2) | The European Trade Union Confederation has submitted nomination for two posts to be filled, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The European Trade Union Confederation has submitted nomination for two posts to be filled,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The following are hereby appointed alternate members of the Governing Board of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions for the period ending on 30 November 2010:

TRADE UNION REPRESENTATIVES

TRADE UNION REPRESENTATIVES

| Country | Alternate members |
| --- | --- |
| Netherlands | Mr Arie WOLTMEIJER |
| Spain | Ms Janire DOMINGUEZ |

Country

Alternate members

Netherlands

Mr Arie WOLTMEIJER

Spain

Ms Janire DOMINGUEZ

Done at Luxembourg, 9 October 2009.

For the Council

The President

Å. TORSTENSSON

---

(1)  OJ L 139, 30.5.1975, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ C 282, 24.11.2007, p. 10.

2

---
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-60828

Summary Calendar

GORDON ANTHONY STRAKER, also known as Gordan A. Straker, also known

as Gordon Straker, also known as Gordon A. Straker,

Petitioner

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A034 989 174

Before DAVIS, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Gordon Anthony Straker, a native and citizen of St. Vincent and the

Grenadines, seeks a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’

(BIA) order denying his motion to reopen his removal proceedings. The BIA

concluded that Straker’s motion, which was his second motion to reopen, was

untimely and number-barred. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2). 

He argues that the Supreme Court’s decision in Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder,

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

July 29, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-60828 Document: 00511555356 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/29/2011
No. 10-60828

130 S. Ct. 2577 (2010), undermined the grounds for the BIA’s removal order

because it established that his prior misdemeanor drug convictions did not

qualify as aggravated felonies. Straker also asserts that the state’s classification

of his offenses as misdemeanors is controlling and that his convictions were too

remote to be the bases for the denial of his request for relief. 

Straker does not challenge the BIA’s determination that his second motion

to reopen was untimely or time-barred. Instead, he presents arguments that

concern the validity of the BIA’s January 2007 order of removal. Thus, because

Straker has not addressed the basis on which his second motion to reopen was

denied, he has abandoned the relevant issue for review by failing to brief it. See

Soadjede v. Ashcroft, 324 F.3d 830, 833 (5th Cir. 2003). His petition for review

is DENIED. 

2

Case: 10-60828 Document: 00511555356 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/29/2011
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

Complainant

vs.

JOSHUA BRAITHWAITE

Respondent.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket Number: 2023-0431

MISLE Activity ID: 

CONSENT ORDER

Issued: January 12, 2024

By Order of Administrative Law Judge Administrative Law Judge:

Honorable Brian J. Curley

Appearances:

For the Coast Guard

LTJG Adrian C. Hill

Sector Honolulu

For the Respondent

Joshua Braithwaite
CONSENT ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

On December 21, 2023, the parties in this case submitted a Motion for Approval of a 

Settlement Agreement and Entry of Consent Order to the Administrative Law Judge for approval 

under 33 C.F.R. § 20.502.

I have carefully reviewed the terms of the Settlement Agreement and find that it is fair, 

reasonable, and in substantial compliance with the requirements of 33 C.F.R. § 20.502.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the record, it is hereby ORDERED that the Settlement Agreement 

is APPROVED in full and incorporated herein by reference. This Consent Order shall 

constitute full, final, and complete adjudication of this proceeding.

__________________________________

Brian Curley

Administrative Law Judge

Date: January 12, 2024
## U NITED 

## S TATES 

## A IR 

## F ORCE



## C OURT OF 

## C RIMINAL 

## A PPEALS



### UNITED STATES ) No. ACM 40001

Appellee )

)

v. )

) ORDER

Titus L. JONES )

Master Sergeant (E

- 7 ) )

U.S. Air Force )

Appellant ) Panel 2

On 2 4 February 2022 , Appellant submitted a Motion to Withdraw from Appellate Review and Attach . Specifically, Appellant moved to attach DD Form

2330, Waiver/Withdrawal of Appellate Rights in General and Special Courts

Martial Subject to Review by a Court of Criminal Appeals , signed by Appellant

and Appellant’s counsel on 23 February 2022

. On 24 February 2022, th e Government submitted its response not opposing Appellant’s motion

.

According ly

, it is by the c ourt on this 24th day of February

, 202 2

,

ORDERED:

Appellant’s Motion to Withdraw from Appellate Review and A tta ch is

GRANTED . Appellant’s case is forwarded to the Appellate Records Branch,

AFLOA/JAJM, for further processing in accordance with Rules for Courts

- Martial 111 5 ( f

)(3) and 1201

, Manual for Courts

- Martial, United States (201 9 ed. ).

FOR THE COURT

CAROL K. JOYCE

C lerk of the Court
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2131 

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 

at 83 Meeting Street in Charleston, South Carolina, as the ‘‘J. Waties 

Waring Judicial Center’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 30, 2015 

Mr. CLYBURN (for himself, Mr. SANFORD, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, 

Mr. DUNCAN of South Carolina, Mr. GOWDY, Mr. MULVANEY, and Mr. 

RICE of South Carolina) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 83 Meeting Street in Charleston, South 

Carolina, as the ‘‘J. Waties Waring Judicial Center’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. J. WATIES WARING FEDERAL BUILDING AND 

4 UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Federal building and United 

6 States courthouse located at 83 Meeting Street in Charles7 ton, South Carolina, shall be known and designated as the 

8 ‘‘J. Waties Waring Judicial Center’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2131 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the Federal building and United States court4 house referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be 

5 a reference to the ‘‘J. Waties Waring Judicial Center’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
1

IN THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA

CASE NO. DA 23-0425

Rikki Held, et al.,

Petitioner and Appellee,

v.

State of Montana, et al.,

Respondent and Appellant.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE 

TO FILE AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF

The States of North Dakota, Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, 

Iowa, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah, 

Wyoming, and the Commonwealth of Virginia (“Amici States”) have moved for 

leave to file an amicus brief. Their motion is unopposed.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Amici States’ Unopposed Motion for Leave 

to File an Amicus Curiae Brief is GRANTED. Amici States shall file their Amicus 

Brief by February 23, 2024.

ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED AND DATED BELOW.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 21 2024

02/21/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0575
# C_2021390EN.01000401.xml

| 27.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 390/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 390/4

---

Special report No 23/2021

Reducing grand corruption in Ukraine: several EU initiatives, but still insufficient results

(2021/C 390/04)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that special report No 23/2021 ‘Reducing grand corruption in Ukraine: several EU initiatives, but still insufficient results’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 18, 2015

No. 04-15-00342-CV

VILLA DIJON CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.

and Implicity Management Company,

Appellants

v.

Mary WINTERS and Mila Cheatom,

Appellees

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015-CI-03926

Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This court granted Appellant’s first motion for extension of time to file the brief, and 

Appellant’s brief was due to be filed on November 10, 2015. On November 12, 2015, Appellant 

filed (1) an unopposed second motion for an extension of time to file the brief, and (2) 

Appellant’s brief. 

Appellant’s motion is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief is deemed timely filed. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 38.6(d). 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 18th day of November, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court