# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 9 D0 36 7 . DANI EL ERI C COBBLE v . DENI SE FACHI NI

.

On M arch 6

, 2 0 19

, s t at e pri s o n er Dan i el Co b bl e fi l ed th i s ap pl i cat i o n fo r

d i s cret i o n ary rev i ew, p u rp o rt ed l y s eek i n g to ap p e a l a Decem b er 4

, 2 0 18 t ri al co u rt

o rd er t h at d en i ed fi l i n g o f hi s pet i t i o n fo r a w ri t o f m an d am u s

. 1 Ho wev er, Co b b l e h as

fai l ed to su b m i t a fi l e-s t am p ed co p y o f t h e o r d e r h e s eek s t o ap p eal

, in v i o l at i o n o f

Co u rt o f Ap p eal s Ru l e 3 1 (c), an d i n s t ead h as s u bm i t ted a s u b s eq u en t t ri al co u rt o rd er

t h at g ran ted h is req u es t t o p ro ceed i n fo rm a p au p eri s. Co n s eq u en t l y , o n M arch 8,

2 0 1 9

, we o rd er e d C o b b l e t o s u p p l em en t hi s ap pl i cat io n wi t h i n t en day s wi t h a

s t am p ed “ fi l ed ” co p y o f t h e o rd er t o b e ap p eal ed

. W e i n d i cat ed t h at fai l u re to co m p l y

wi t h t h i s d i rect i v e wo u l d res u l t i n d i s m i s sal o f t h e ap pl i cat io n

. Co b b le has fai l ed to

co m p l y wi t h t h i s d i rect i v e. Reg ard l es s , we l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n fo r m u l t i p l e reas o n s

. To t h e ex t en t th at Co b bl e s eek s d i s cret io n ary rev iew o f t h e o rd er gran t i n g h i s

req u es t t o p ro ceed i n fo rm a p au p eri s , we l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n fo r t wo reas o ns

. Fi rs t

, t h e

l i m i ted reco rd m at eri al s Co b b l e h as s u b m i t t ed co n t ai n n o i n di cat i on t h at t h i s i s a fi n al

o rd er t h at res o l v ed al l i s s u es i n t h i s cas e. Co n s eq uen t l y , Co bb l e’ s fai l u re t o u s e t h e

inte r loc utor

y a ppe a l p ro ced u res , i n cl u d i n g o bt ai n i n g a cert i fi cat e of im m e dia te r e vie w

f r o m t h e t ri al co u rt

, d ep ri v es u s o f ju ri s d i ct i o n o v er t hi s ap p l i cat io n

. See OC G A

§ 5 -6 -3 4 (b ); Bo

yd v. S t a t e , 1 91 Ga. Ap p

. 4 3 5

, 4 3 5 (3 8 3 SE2 d 9 0 6) (1 9 8 9 ). Seco n d,

b ecau s e Co b b l e was n o t ag g ri ev ed b y t h e o rd er g ran t i n g h i s req u es t t o p ro ceed in

fo rm a p au p eri s, h e h as no l e g a l r i g h t t o ap p eal t h at d eci si o n

. See Co o p er Mo t o r

Li n es

, In c. v. B. C. Tr u ck Li n es

, In c. , 2 1 5 Ga. 1 9 5

, 1 9 5 ( 1 ) & (2 ) (1 0 9 SE2 d 6 8 9 )

1 Th i s i s Co b b l e’ s t hi rt y -fi ft h fi l in g i n t h i s Co u rt s i n ce 2 0 0 2. March 28, 2019(1 9 5 9); see al s o In t h e In t er es t o f J. R. P.

, 2 87 Ga. Ap p. 6 21

, 6 2 2 -6 2 4 (1 ) & (2 ) (6 5 2

SE2 d 2 0 6) (2 0 0 7); Mo r

g a n v. M i l l er , 1 9 1 Ga. Ap p

. 8 0 3

, 8 0 4 (3 8 3 SE2 d 1 83 ) (1 9 8 9 ).

To t h e ex ten t t h at Co b b l e s eek s t o ap p eal t h e Decem b er 4 o rd er, we l i k ewi s e

l ack ju ri s d i ct io n , al s o fo r two reas o n s. Fi rs t

, we d en i ed Co b b l e’ s p ri or ap p li cat i o n fo r

d i s cret i o n ary rev i ew o f th e Decem b er 4 o rd er i n Co b b l e v. Fa ch i ni

, No

. A1 9 D0 2 3 3

(J an

. 3

, 2 0 19 ). O u r d e n i al o f t h at ap p l i cat io n bars fu rt h er ap pel l at e rev i ew o f t h e

Decem b er 4 o rd er. See Ro s s v. S t a t e , 3 1 0 Ga. Ap p

. 3 2 6

, 32 7 (7 1 3 SE2 d 4 38 ) (2 0 1 1 )

(“ [A] n y i s s u e t h at was rai s ed an d res o l v ed i n an earl i er ap peal i s t h e l aw o f t h e cas e

an d i s b i n d i n g o n th i s Co u rt . . . .”) (p un ct u at i o n o m i t t ed ); Ho o k v. Ber g en , 2 8 6 Ga.

Ap p

. 2 58

, 2 6 1 (1 ) (6 4 9 S E2 d 3 13 ) (2 0 0 7 ) (“ [T] h e d en ial o f an ap p l i cat i o n fo r

d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal i s an ad ju d i cat i o n o n t h e m eri ts o f t h e u nd erl y i n g o rd er an d act s

as res ju d i cat a i n s u b s eq u en t p ro ceed i ng s .”). Seco n d, an ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i s cret i o n ary

rev i ew m u s t b e fi l ed w it hi n 3 0 d ay s o f en try o f th e o rd er o r ju d g m en t t o b e ap p eal ed

. OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (d ). Th e req u i rem en t s o f OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 are j u ri sd i ct i o n al

, an d t h i s

Co u rt can n o t accep t an ap p l i cat i o n fo r ap p eal n o t m ad e i n co m p l i an ce t h erewi t h.

Bo yl e v. S t a t e , 1 9 0 Ga. Ap p

. 7 3 4, 7 3 4 (3 8 0 SE2 d 5 7) ( 1 9 8 9 )

. Co bb l e’ s i n s t an t

ap p li cat io n was u n ti m el y fi l ed 9 2 d ay s aft er en t ry o f t h e Decem b er 4 o rd er.

Fo r each o f th e ab ov e reas o n s , we l ack ju ri s d i ct io n o v er t h i s ap pl i cat io n , wh i ch

i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 03/28/2019