alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021476EN.01000501.xml

| 26.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 476/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 476/5

---

Special report No 26/2021

Regularity of spending in EU Cohesion policy: Commission discloses annually a minimum estimated level of error that is not final

(2021/C 476/05)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that special report No 26/2021 ‘Regularity of spending in EU Cohesion policy: Commission discloses annually a minimum estimated level of error that is not final’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ Internet: http://eca.europa.eu

---
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 15, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51385-51386]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19893]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

National Endowment for the Arts


Arts Advisory Panel Meetings

AGENCY: National Endowment for the Arts, National Foundation on the 
Arts and the Humanities.

ACTION: Notice of meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, 
notice is hereby given that 2 meetings of the Arts Advisory Panel to 
the National Council on the Arts will be held by teleconference or 
videoconference.

DATES: See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for individual meeting 
times and dates. All meetings are Eastern time and ending times are 
approximate.

ADDRESSES: National Endowment for the Arts, Constitution Center, 400 
7th St. SW, Washington, DC 20506.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Further information with reference to 
these meetings can be obtained from Ms. Sherry Hale, Office of 
Guidelines & Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts, 
Washington, DC 20506; <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3a525b565f497a5b484e49145d554c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="325a535e574172534046411c555d44">[email protected]</span></a>, or call 202/682-5696.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The closed portions of meetings are for the 
purpose of Panel review, discussion,

[[Page 51386]]

evaluation, and recommendations on financial assistance under the 
National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965, as 
amended, including information given in confidence to the agency. In 
accordance with the determination of the Chairman of September 10, 
2019, these sessions will be closed to the public pursuant to 
subsection (c)(6) of section 552b of title 5, United States Code.
    The upcoming meetings are:

American Rescue Plan Locals Subgranting (review of applications):
    This meeting will be closed. Date and time: October 4, 2021, 1:00 
p.m. to 3:00 p.m.
American Rescue Plan Locals Subgranting (review of applications):
    This meeting will be closed. Date and time: October 4, 2021, 3:30 
p.m. to 5:30 p.m.

    Dated: September 10, 2021.
Sherry P. Hale,
Staff Assistant, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 2021-19893 Filed 9-14-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2009058EN.01000401.xml

| 12.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 58/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 58/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5399 — Mubadala/Rolls Royce/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 58/02)

On 16 February 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5399. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5399. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
Listen

# Event Calendar

View Commission business meeting dates for 2024

----

-    First  
-    Previous  
-   ...  
-  17 
-  18 
-  19 

-  Event Calendar 
-  Public Briefings 
-  Commission Business Meetings 
-  Advisory Committees Meetings 
-  Archives 

## Filter Options
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2222 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2222

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the limitation on 
 the allowance of a deduction to Members of Congress for ordinary and 
                      necessary business expenses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 1, 2015

   Mr. Issa introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the limitation on 
 the allowance of a deduction to Members of Congress for ordinary and 
                      necessary business expenses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Eliminate Special Treatment for 
Congress Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF LIMITATION ON ALLOWANCE OF DEDUCTION TO MEMBERS OF 
              CONGRESS FOR ORDINARY AND NECESSARY BUSINESS EXPENSES.

    (a) In General.--Section 162(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by striking ``home,'' and all that follows through 
``$3,000.'' and inserting ``home.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2015.
                                 <all>
```
#### OPPENHEIM v. TAMSEN.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July, 1896.)

Action by Leo Oppenheim against Edward J. H. Tamsen, sheriff.

No opinion. Motion denied. See 40 N. Y. Supp. 1146.
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1. | The                Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section                13(a) or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in                all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Company. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |    /s/                L. Granger Cobb |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   | L.                Granger Cobb                       |
|   | Co-Chief                Executive Officer            |
|   | November                9, 2007                      |

----
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES


 




EXHIBIT 4.1

 

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES

REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

The following summary describes the common stock of LogicQuest Technology, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“LogicQuest” or the “Company”), which is registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Only the Company’s common stock is registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act.

 

DESCRIPTION OF COMMON STOCK

 

The following description of our common stock is a summary and is qualified in its entirety by reference to our Articles of Incorporation, as amended and our Bylaws, as amended, and by applicable law. For purposes of this description, references to “LogicQuest,” “we,” “our” and “us” refer to LogicQuest.

 

Authorized Capitalization

 

We have authorized capital stock consisting of 20,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.001 par value per share (“Preferred Stock”). 

 

Common Stock

 

                Voting Rights. Each share of our common stock is entitled to one vote on all stockholder matters. Shares of our common stock do not possess any cumulative voting rights.

 

Except for the election of directors, if a quorum is present, an action on a matter is approved if it receives the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of the shares of capital stock present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the matter, unless otherwise required by applicable law, Nevada law, our Articles of Incorporation, as amended or Bylaws, as amended. The election of directors will be determined by a plurality of the votes cast in respect of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote, meaning that the nominees with the greatest number of votes cast, even if less than a majority, will be elected. The rights, preferences and privileges of holders of common stock are subject to, and may be impacted by, the rights of the holders of shares of any series of preferred stock that we have designated, or may designate and issue in the future.

 

Dividend Rights. Each share of our common stock is entitled to equal dividends and distributions per share with respect to the common stock when, as and if declared by our Board of Directors, subject to any preferential or other rights of any outstanding preferred stock.

 

Liquidation and Dissolution Rights. Upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up, our common stock will be entitled to receive pro rata on a share-for-share basis, the assets available for distribution to the stockholders after payment of liabilities and payment of preferential and other amounts, if any, payable on any outstanding preferred stock.

  

Other Matters. No holder of any shares of our common stock has a preemptive right to subscribe for any of our securities, nor are any shares of our common stock subject to redemption or convertible into other securities.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2136 

To amend titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act to provide for quality 

reviews of benefit decisions, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 30, 2015 

Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas (for himself, Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania, Mr. 

REED, Mr. YOUNG of Indiana, and Mrs. BLACK) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act 

to provide for quality reviews of benefit decisions, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Improving the Quality 

5 of Disability Decisions Act of 2015’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2136 IH

1 SEC. 2. PRE-EFFECTUATION AND POST-EFFECTUATION 

2 QUALITY REVIEWS OF HEARING DISPOSI3 TIONS. 

4 (a) AMENDMENT TO TITLE II.—Section 205(b) of 

5 the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 405(b)) is amended 

6 by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(4)(A) The Commissioner of Social Security shall 

8 conduct pre-effectuation and post-effectuation quality re9 views of hearing dispositions with respect to decisions in 

10 connection with applications for benefits under this title, 

11 in a sufficient number to ensure compliance with laws, 

12 regulations, and other guidance issued by the Commis13 sioner of Social Security. 

14 ‘‘(B) The Commissioner of Social Security shall an15 nually submit to the Committee on Ways and Means of 

16 the House of Representatives and the Committee on Fi17 nance of the Senate a report that includes— 

18 ‘‘(i) the total number of cases selected for a 

19 quality review as described in subparagraph (A); 

20 ‘‘(ii) the number of such cases in which a deci21 sion is remanded; and 

22 ‘‘(iii) the number of such cases in which a deci23 sion is modified or reversed.’’. 

24 (b) AMENDMENT TO TITLE XVI.—Section 1633 of 

25 the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1383b) is amended by 

26 adding at the end the following: 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2136 IH

1 ‘‘(f)(1) The Commissioner of Social Security shall 

2 conduct pre-effectuation and post-effectuation quality re3 views of hearing dispositions with respect to decisions in 

4 connection with applications for benefits under this title, 

5 in a sufficient number to ensure compliance with laws, 

6 regulations, and other guidance issued by the Commis7 sioner of Social Security. 

8 ‘‘(2) The Commissioner of Social Security shall annu9 ally submit to the Committee on Ways and Means of the 

10 House of Representatives and the Committee on Finance 

11 of the Senate a report that includes— 

12 ‘‘(A) the total number of cases selected for a 

13 quality review as described in paragraph (1); 

14 ‘‘(B) the number of such cases in which a deci15 sion is remanded; and 

16 ‘‘(C) the number of such cases in which a deci17 sion is modified or reversed.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Blount International, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James S.Osterman, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i)            TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of thedates and for the periods expressed in the report.

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to BlountInternational, Inc. and will be retained by Blount International, Inc. and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| Date: August 8, 2007      |
|---------------------------|
|                      |
|                      |
| /s/ James S. Osterman     |   |
| James S. Osterman         |
| Chairman of the Board and |
| Chief Executive Officer   |

 

----
#### Leonard Mastrogiacomo, Appellant, v Helene R. Mastrogiacomo, Respondent.

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated October 21, 1974, the plaintiff husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rigler, J.), dated October 24, 1986, which denied his motion for the termination of the provisions relating to alimony and medical expenses of the judgment of divorce and of a separation agreement which did not merge in the divorce judgment, and for an examination before trial with respect to the defendant wife’s income and assets.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The trial court did not err in denying, without a hearing, the husband’s motion pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 236 (A) (1) and § 248 to modify the judgment of divorce and the separation agreement, which was incorporated but not merged therein, so as to delete the requirement that he pay alimony and the medical expenses of the wife. The husband may challenge the separation agreement only by means of a plenary action *(see, Culp v Culp,*117 AD2d 700). Therefore, even if this court were to modify downward the alimony provision of the divorce judgment, the wife’s contractual rights in the separation agreement could not thereby be impaired *(see, e.g., Kleila v Kleila,*50 NY2d 277, 283; *King v Schultz,*29 NY2d 718; *cf.,*Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [9] [b]). In any event, the husband failed to sustain his burden of demonstrating a change of circumstances sufficient to require a hearing on his motion to terminate the alimony provision of the judgment *(see, Hickland v Hickland,*56 AD2d 978, 979; *cf., Levinson v Levinson,*97 AD2d 458, 459). In order to terminate *672his support obligation pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 248 the husband was required to satisfy a two-pronged test demonstrating both cohabitation and conduct by the wife amounting to "holding out” that she is married to another man *(see, Matter of Bliss v Bliss,*66 NY2d 382, 387). There is an insufficient basis in the record before us upon which to direct a hearing on the issue of whether the holding-out requirement was met *(see, Gershen v Gershen,*120 AD2d 641, 642; *Hofmeister v Hofmeister,*120 AD2d 802). Moreover, at bar, the separation agreement provides for termination of the alimony provision only upon the wife’s remarriage or the death of either party. Thus, the terms of the agreement are different from those provided by Domestic Relations Law § 248 and must be enforced by the court absent some overriding public policy reason not present at bar *(see, Scharnweber v Scharnweber,*65 NY2d 1016, 1017).

We have considered the husband’s remaining argument and find it to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Eiber, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.
#### Maria Resto, Also Known as Maria Munoz, Individually and as Mother and Natural Guardian of Manuel Resto, an Infant, Respondent, v Nuri Kohen et al., Appellants.

This action was commenced by the plaintiff Maria Resto, also known as Maria Munoz, to recover damages on behalf of her then-infant son, Manuel Resto, and herself, individually, as a result of personal injuries sustained by Manuel on November 8, 1976, when he allegedly fell down a flight of *723stairs in a two-family residence and store premises owned by the defendants.

In October 1980 the action was marked off the Trial Calendar because the counsel for the plaintiff and her son had lost contact with them after they had moved to Puerto Rico. Thus, the plaintiff and her son were unavailable to submit to depositions, which were to be held 10 days before the trial. In October 1981 the action was automatically dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3404 for neglect to prosecute. Thereafter, in October 1985, five years after the case was marked off the calendar, the plaintiff and her son sought to vacate the dismissal and restore the matter to the Trial Calendar.

We find that neither the plaintiff nor her son, who was over 21 years of age at the time of the motion, has adequately rebutted the presumption of abandonment created by the dismissal of the action pursuant to CPLR 3404. Moreover, no reasonable excuse was offered for the five-year delay nor was it shown that the defendants would not be prejudiced by the delay *(cf. Sheehan v Hollywood,*112 AD2d 211, 212).

Accordingly, the order appealed from should be reversed, and the plaintiff’s motion denied. Brown, J. P., Rubin, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.
Skip to main content

Privacy Policy•Site map

# Requesting a Duplicate Certificate of Admission

To request a Duplicate Certificate of Admission, an attorney must submit a letter, which includes the attorney's current contact information (name, firm/office, address, phone number, e-mail address) along with the attorney's admission date and the required fee in the form of a check made payable to Clerk, U.S. Court of Federal Claims, to the following address:

Office of the Clerk of CourtUnited States Court of Federal Claims717 Madison Place, NWWashington, DC 20439

For assistance, please call the Clerk's Office at (202) 357-6406.

The Clerk's Office will process the request within one week of receipt. The completed certificate will be mailed to the requesting attorney at the attorney's official address of record in the court's CM/ECF system unless otherwise directed.

Howard T. Markey National Courts Building • 717 Madison Place, NW, Washington, DC 20439 • 202-357-6400
H. R. 2270 

One Hundred Fourteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the sixth day of January, two thousand and fifteen 

An Act 

To redesignate the Nisqually National Wildlife Refuge, located in the State of 

Washington, as the Billy Frank Jr. Nisqually National Wildlife Refuge, to establish 

the Medicine Creek Treaty National Memorial within the wildlife refuge, and 

for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Billy Frank Jr. Tell Your Story 

Act’’. 

SEC. 2. REDESIGNATION OF THE NISQUALLY NATIONAL WILDLIFE 

REFUGE. 

(a) REDESIGNATION.—The Nisqually National Wildlife Refuge, 

located in the State of Washington, is redesignated as the ‘‘Billy 

Frank Jr. Nisqually National Wildlife Refuge’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any statute, rule, regulation, Executive order, publication, map, paper, or other document 

of the United States to the Nisqually National Wildlife Refuge 

is deemed to refer to the Billy Frank Jr. Nisqually National Wildlife 

Refuge. 

SEC. 3. MEDICINE CREEK TREATY NATIONAL MEMORIAL, WASHINGTON. 

(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—There is established the Medicine Creek 

Treaty National Memorial within the Billy Frank Jr. Nisqually 

National Wildlife Refuge to commemorate the location of the signing 

of the Medicine Creek Treaty of 1854 between the United States 

Government and leaders of the Muckleshoot, Nisqually, Puyallup, 

and Squaxin Island Indian Tribes. 

(b) ACREAGE AND ADMINISTRATION.—The Secretary of the 

Interior shall establish the boundaries of the Medicine Creek Treaty 

National Memorial and provide for administration and interpretation of the memorial by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 

(c) COORDINATION.—The Secretary of the Interior shall coordinate with representatives of the Muckleshoot, Nisqually, Puyallup, 
H. R. 2270—2 

and Squaxin Island Indian Tribes in providing for the interpretation 

of the Medicine Creek Treaty National Memorial. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.