alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Philip Coffey et al., Appellants-Respondents, v Peggy Ellen Baker et al., Respondents, and Thomas J. Kelly et al., Respondents-Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Submitted January 2, 2007;

decided February 20, 2007

Motion by plaintiffs for leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as dismissed the complaint against defendants Gill and Keystone Automotive Operations, Inc. denied. Cross motion by the Kelly defendants, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order that granted the motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and cross claims against defendants Gill and Keystone Automotive Operations, Inc. denied; cross motion for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the remainder of the Appellate Division order does not finally determine the action with respect to the Kelly defendants within the meaning of the Constitution.
# C_2021031EN.01005001.xml

| 28.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/50

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10076 — Cinven/Raffles/Miller)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 31/09)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Cinven Capital Management (SFF) General Partner Limited (‘Cinven’) (Guernsey), |
| --- | --- |

—

Cinven Capital Management (SFF) General Partner Limited (‘Cinven’) (Guernsey),

| — | Raffles Private Holdings Limited (‘Raffles’) (United Kingdom), controlled by GIC Private Limited (‘GIC’) (United Kingdom), |
| --- | --- |

—

Raffles Private Holdings Limited (‘Raffles’) (United Kingdom), controlled by GIC Private Limited (‘GIC’) (United Kingdom),

| — | Miller Insurance Services LLP (‘Miller’) (United Kingdom). |
| --- | --- |

—

Miller Insurance Services LLP (‘Miller’) (United Kingdom).

Cinven and Raffles acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of Miller.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | Cinven is a private equity business primarily active in the provision of management and advisory services to investment funds. |
| --- | --- |

—

Cinven is a private equity business primarily active in the provision of management and advisory services to investment funds.

| — | Raffles is an investment vehicle of GIC, which manages a diversified global portfolio of investments in private equity, venture capital and infrastructure funds, as well as direct investments in private companies. |
| --- | --- |

—

Raffles is an investment vehicle of GIC, which manages a diversified global portfolio of investments in private equity, venture capital and infrastructure funds, as well as direct investments in private companies.

| — | Miller is active in the provision of non-life insurance and reinsurance broking services. |
| --- | --- |

—

Miller is active in the provision of non-life insurance and reinsurance broking services.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10076 — Cinven/Raffles/Miller

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-41567 on Form S-8, filed on December 5,1997, Registration Statement No. 333-98051 on Form S-8, filed on August 14, 2002, and Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement No. 333-112299 on Form S-3, filed on June 4, 2004, of Prolong International Corporation (the “Company”) of ourreport dated February 11, 2004, except for Note 3, as to which the date is April 7, 2004, which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company’s restatement of its 2002 and 2001 consolidatedfinancial statements, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) of Prolong International Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2003. 

 

/s/    Haskell & White LLP 

HASKELL & WHITE LLP 

 

Irvine, California 

June 2, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          24,070
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,974
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    161,127
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               202,771
<PP&E>                                         135,999
<DEPRECIATION>                                  34,213
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 513,222
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,325
<BONDS>                                        212,427
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,048
<OTHER-SE>                                     738,202
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   513,222
<SALES>                                        307,545
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               307,545
<CGS>                                          187,779
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  438,619
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (318,853)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 63,186
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (255,668)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .110
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .110


</TABLE>
NRCS 706 - QUARTZ MOUNTAINLatitude: 42.319Longitude: -120.825Elevation: None

NRCS 706 - Quartz Mountain

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Crazyman Flat Site Page...



Crazyman Flat

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Quartz Mountain Site Page...



Quartz Mountain

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Strawberry Site Page...



Strawberry
#### EDELMUTH, Appellant, v. SULZBERGER et. al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 15, 1897.)

Action by Adolph Edelmuth against' Ferdinand Sulzberger and others. E. J. Myers, for appellant. R. W. Peckham, Jr., for respondents.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 6174

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. GEORGE CHARLES KALIVRETENOS , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Anthony John Trenga , District Judge. ( 1:15

- cr - 00073

- AJT

- 1 ; 1:19

- cv - 01552

- AJT )

Submitted : June 16, 2020 Decided: June 19, 2020

Before MOTZ and KING , Circuit Judges , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. George Charles Kalivretenos , Appellant Pro Se

. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: George Charles Kalivret enos seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (201 8 ) motion

. See Whiteside v. United States , 775 F.3d 180, 182

- 83 (4th Cir. 2014) (en banc) (explaining that § 2255 motions are subject to one

year statute of li mitations, running from latest of four commencement dates enumerated in 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f)). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)( B ) (201 8 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (201 8 ). When , as here, the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the disposi tive procedural ruling is debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Kalivretenos has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in t he materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS RESTATED SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND FOR THE YEAR THEN
ENDED
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       4,082,486
<SECURITIES>                                26,357,318
<RECEIVABLES>                                  782,230
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    745,977
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            31,494,265
<PP&E>                                       2,757,758
<DEPRECIATION>                                 504,909
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              34,929,504
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,193,542
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,437
<OTHER-SE>                                  33,310,934
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                34,929,504
<SALES>                                      4,556,861
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,023,523
<CGS>                                        2,386,896
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,755,051
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (568,651)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,162,877)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,162,877)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,162,877)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.17)
        

</TABLE>
**sr/m: of** **/M Btxtx** 

# MOTION**TO**

# ASIDE**INOIC <>2>** **~o CO** **■.-.'- ;.•'** **/a/ if** **Mi's**

### IN**addihctv vy** **&t-i,r**

### W-f-**He Court** **fit Sy** **/an**

### /■**71*/****//- /fat** **perse*****fa**

### J.**/t fit-** 

### 32A.

## ART,**it 4.** **Ol.****T*/+t*****S fc** **aefa j{<//J<** 

### On,**fails**

## This**arhe'fe "«S** **(I) 100** **dHf/S //** **Mt ar** **lk& fn+ry** 

# Mf.it.**IE. fit** **s.**

## Hi

# h/l**-/it/-******/ /(rfcU** **I*-****60/... 4^** **to SB** **y>^**

### Ji/t.**0?j Mf** **r*f***

# -H)**—~r ok** 

### hi

# $4,6

# is**Urth fk<L** **C3, so** **Q! f—** **vn "So** **re*****.VXJ ■=!■** **- j ..,** **■' ■.-■** **CO**

### rl**31 -■■** **VI**
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 15

- 11172 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 4:11

- cr
- 00249

- WTM

- GRS

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus ANAISSA BETH GERWALD, a.k.a. Anaizza Gerwald, a.k.a. Ann E. Meraw, a.k.a. Ana Isabel Marraquin, a.k.a. Ana Isabel Garcia,
Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court fo r the Southern District of Georgia

________________________ (September 15, 2015) Case: 15-11172 Date Filed: 09/15/2015 Page: 1 of 22 Before TJOFLAT , ROSENBAUM , and JULIE CARNES , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: George R. Asinc , appointed counsel for Anaissa Gerwald in this criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further repres entation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED , and the revocation of Gerwald ’s supervised release and her
revocation sentence are AFFIRMED

. Gerwald’s motion for appointment of
substitute counsel is DENIED

.

Case: 15-11172 Date Filed: 09/15/2015 Page: 2 of 2
# C_2021129EN.01001101.xml

| 13.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/11

---

Notice for the attention of the persons to whom measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/235/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/595 and in Council Regulation (EU) No 359/2011, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/587 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Iran apply

(2021/C 129/07)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2011/235/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/595 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 359/2011 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/587 (4) concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Iran.

The Council of the European Union has decided that the persons that appear in the abovementioned Annexes should continue to be included in the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2011/235/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 359/2011.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 359/2011, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council before 31 December 2021, together with supporting documentation that the decision to include them on the abovementioned list should be reconsidered to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| RELEX.1.C |
| General Secretariat |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

RELEX.1.C

General Secretariat

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, 2nd paragraph, and Article 263, 4th and 6th paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 100, 14.4.2011, p. 51.

(2)  OJ L 125, 13.4.2021, p. 58

(3)  OJ L 100, 14.4.2011, p. 1

(4)  OJ L 125, 13.4.2021, p. 1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         $2,102,467
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,102,467
<PP&E>                                         502,737
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (51,723)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,788,362
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          154,542
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2,340
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,631,480
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,788,362
<SALES>                                        39,260
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               103,260
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,434,750
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,132,714)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,132,714)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.91)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.91)
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 218 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 218

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the maximum age for 
     children eligible for medical care under the CHAMPVA program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 8, 2015

    Ms. Brown of Florida (for herself and Mr. Walz) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the maximum age for 
     children eligible for medical care under the CHAMPVA program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``CHAMPVA Children's Protection Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE OF MAXIMUM AGE FOR CHILDREN ELIGIBLE FOR MEDICAL CARE 
              UNDER CHAMPVA PROGRAM.

    (a) Increase.--Section 1781(c) of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``twenty-three'' and inserting ``twenty-
        six''; and
            (2) by striking ``twenty-third birthday'' and inserting 
        ``twenty-sixth birthday''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to medical care provided on or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### CITY DIME SAVINGS & LOAN ASS’N, Respondent, v. LOBDELL et al., Appellants (two cases).

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fifth Department.

March 27, 1894.)

Action by the City Dime Savings & Loan Association against William A. Lobdell and others.

Argued before DWIGHT, P. J., and LEWIS, HAIGHT, and BRADLEY, JJ.

No opinion.' Appeal dismissed, unless printed papers are served on or before the second Tuesday of the term.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1
 
               COMPUTATION OF PRIMARY EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
 
                     (IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    DECEMBER 31,
                                                                        1996
                                                                    ------------
<S>                                                                 <C>
HISTORICAL COMPUTATION (1)
Net loss available for common stock (2)............................   $(477.7)
Average common shares outstanding (3)..............................      54.9
Primary net loss per common share (2)..............................   $ (8.70)
                                                                      =======
</TABLE>
--------
(1) Historical computation of primary earnings per common share for the years
    ended December 31, 1995 and 1994 is not considered meaningful as
    Allegiance did not have common shares for these historical periods.
(2) Net loss in 1996 includes a charge of $550.0 million for the write-down of
    goodwill, and other non-recurring costs of a pretax amount of $95.5
    million primarily for facility consolidations and other asset write-downs.
(3) Common shares are based on the weighted average number of shares
    outstanding subsequent to the distribution on September 30, 1996, assuming
    the shares issued in connection with the distribution had been issued
    January 1.