alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL D. WOODFALL,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF

AMERICA; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 13-15147

D.C. No. 2:11-cv-00163-SRB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Susan R. Bolton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 18, 2014** 

Before: ALARCÓN, O’SCANNLAIN, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

Michael D. Woodfall, a former Hawaii state prisoner, appeals pro se from

the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging

deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs while housed in Arizona. We

FILED

FEB 27 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Toguchi v. Chung,

391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 2004), and we affirm. 

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Woodfall

failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether defendants were

deliberately indifferent in treating his lower back injury. See id. at 1057-58 (a

prison official acts with deliberate indifference only if he or she knows of and

disregards an excessive risk to the prisoner’s health; neither a prisoner’s difference

of opinion concerning the course of treatment nor mere negligence in diagnosing

or treating a medical condition amounts to deliberate indifference). 

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009)

(per curiam). 

AFFIRMED.

2 13-15147
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2208 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to strengthen and protect 

Medicare hospice programs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 1, 2015 

Mr. REED (for himself and Mr. THOMPSON of California) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to 

strengthen and protect Medicare hospice programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hospice Commitment 

5 to Accurate and Relevant Encounters Act’’ or the ‘‘Hos6 pice CARE’’. 

7 SEC. 2. ENSURING TIMELY ACCESS TO HOSPICE CARE. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1814(a)(7)(D)(i) of the 

9 Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395f(a)(7)(D)(i)) is 

10 amended to read as follows: 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2208 IH

1 ‘‘(i) a hospice physician, nurse practi2 tioner, clinical nurse specialist, or physi3 cian assistant (as those terms are defined 

4 in section 1861(aa)(5)), or other health 

5 professional (as designated by the Sec6 retary), has a face-to-face encounter with 

7 the individual to determine continued eligi8 bility of the individual for hospice care 

9 prior to the first 60-day period and each 

10 subsequent recertification under subpara11 graph (A)(ii) (or, in the case where a hos12 pice program newly admits an individual 

13 who would be entering their first 60-day 

14 period or a subsequent hospice benefit pe15 riod or where exceptional circumstances, as 

16 defined by the Secretary, may prevent a 

17 face-to-face encounter prior to the begin18 ning of the hospice benefit period, not later 

19 than 7 calendar days after the individual’s 

20 election under section 1812(d)(1) with re21 spect to the hospice program) and attests 

22 that such visit took place (in accordance 

23 with procedures established by the Sec24 retary); and’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2208 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) takes effect on January 1, 2016, and ap3 plies to hospice care furnished on or after such date. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
November 6, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NGOZI ORISAKWE IN HER CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT AND BOARD 

CHAIR OF UMUADA IGBO IN DISPORA USA, INC., HOUSTON CHAPTER; 

AND NGOZI ORISAKWE, INDIVIDUALLY, Appellants

NO. 14-14-00691-CV V.

BRIDGET B. AKAZIE, AGNES OLOLO COMMY AWAGWU AND JANE 

DOE NOS. 1-20, Appellees

________________________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the order 

signed by the court below on July 24, 2014. Having considered the motion and 

found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellants, Ngozi Orisakwe in her capacity as President and Board Chair of 

Umuada Igbo in Dispora USA, Inc., Houston Chapter; and Ngozi Orisakwe, 

Individually, jointly and severally.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
#### Jerard Chartier *v.*Commissioner of Welfare

*Dennis J. O’Brien,*in support of the petition.

Submitted April 30

decided May 6, 1975

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Division of the Court of Common Pleas is denied.
# C_2021082EN.01000401.xml

| 11.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8920 — Mitsubishi Corporation/Arjun Infrastructure Partners/South Staffordshire)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 82/04)

On 19 June 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8920. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8920. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
# C_2021332EN.01000301.xml

| 18.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 332/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 332/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10332 — KKR/Equitix Tetragon/Target)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 332/03)

On 11 August 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10332. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10332. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-40431

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RAY MARTIN,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:98-CR-155-ALL

- - - - - - - - - -

January 23, 2001

Before DAVIS, JONES and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ray Martin pleaded guilty to being an unlawful user of a

controlled substance in possession of a firearm, in violation of

18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3). He now appeals his sentence. He argues

that the district court erred in not sustaining his objection to

a two-level increase pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(1)(B) for

his possession of seven firearms in connection with the offense. 

He contends that there was insufficient evidence to connect him

to the four firearms found in his truck. However, Martin was the

registered owner of the truck and he was a passenger in the truck
No. 00-40431

-2-

when it was stopped for a traffic violation, at which point the

firearms were found in the truck with Martin, along with drug

paraphernalia including eleven syringes. A subsequent search of

Martin’s person revealed a small amount of methamphetamine in the

front pocket of his overalls. Thus, the district court’s finding

that Martin possessed the firearms, within the meaning of

§ 2K2.1(b)(1), while an unlawful user of a narcotic, was not

clear error. See United States v. Parker, 133 F.3d 322, 330 (5th

Cir.)(no clear error where the district court’s factual finding

is plausible in light of the record read as a whole), cert.

denied, 523 U.S. 1142 (1998). 

Martin’s argument regarding the district court’s denial of a

three-level reduction for acceptance of responsibility, pursuant

to U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1, relates to his conviction for theft of

Government property and is addressed in that appeal. 

AFFIRMED.
Listen

# Washington

Washington Advisory Committee Releases Report on Physical Barriers to Accessibility for Individuals with Disabilities
NewsPublished: March 5, 2024

Physical Barriers to Accessibility for Individuals with Disabilities in Washington
ReportsPublished: March 5, 2024

Washington Advisory Committee Issues Report on Excessive Use of Force by Law Enforcement Officers
NewsPublished: January 19, 2022

Barriers to Accountability for Law Enforcement Officers’ Use of Excessive Force in Washington State
ReportsPublished: January 19, 2022

Washington Advisory Committee Meeting
EventPublished: September 1, 2021Event Date: December 14, 2021

Washington Advisory Committee Meeting
EventPublished: September 1, 2021Event Date: December 1, 2021

Washington Advisory Committee Meeting
EventPublished: September 1, 2021Event Date: November 2, 2021

Washington Advisory Committee Meeting
EventPublished: September 1, 2021Event Date: October 13, 2021

Washington Advisory Committee Meeting
EventPublished: September 1, 2021Event Date: September 28, 2021

Washington Advisory Committee Meeting
EventPublished: September 1, 2021Event Date: September 8, 2021

-  1 
-   Next  

  Subscribe to Washington
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Blount International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joshua L. Collins, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the report.

A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Blount International, Inc. and will be retained by Blount International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: May 6, 2011



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Joshua L. Collins  
|Joshua L. Collins      
|Chairman and           
|Chief Executive Officer
# C_2021059EN.01000101.xml

| 19.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 59/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 59/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10112 — CVC/Riverstone Europe)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 59/01)

On 12 February 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10112. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10112. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
# C_2021083EN.01000101.xml

| 12.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 83/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 83/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10178 — Eni/Aldro EyS/Instalaciones MD)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 83/01)

On 5 March 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10178. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10178. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
2024 LATINA STYLE DISTINGUISHED

MILITARY SERVICE AWARDS

ABOUT THE AWARD

This award recognizes and

celebrates the accomplishments

of women in all branches of the

military, Department of Defense

civilian workforce, and Service

Academies who have enhanced

the role of Latinas in their

organization, DoD, and Academy.

Any Coast Guard member can

nominate a deserving individual!

NOMINATIONS ARE NOW OPEN!

WHO CAN BE NOMINATED?

WHO CAN NOMINATE?

HOW DO I SUBMIT A

NOMINATION?

You can request a nomination 

form from the acting Civil Rights 

Awards Manager and follow 

instructions in ALCOAST 027/24.

(Contact Information at bottom.)

To learn more about the LATINA Style

Distinguished Military Service Award,

including award and nomination

criteria, scan the QR code.

DEADLINE IS MAY 24, 2024

All active duty, civilian, or Cadets

of the USCG and USCGA are

eligible for consideration.

WHAT IS THE PERIOD

OF PERFORMANCE?

The eligibility period for the

2024 LATINA Style

Distinguished Military Service

Award is June 2023 to June

2024.

Point of Contact: Mr. Edward Stoker Edward.A.Stoker@uscg.mil
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0440

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JOSEPH FRANCIS SILVA,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including June 14, 2021, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 10 2021

05/10/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0440
Listen

# Maine Advisory Committee Releases Report on The Right to Criminal Legal Defense in Maine

November 1, 2023

The Maine Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights has released a report following a series of public meetings on the right to criminal legal defense in Maine. The Committee specifically examined whether certain laws, policies, or practices in Maine restrict the right to criminal legal defense as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and Maine state law, with an emphasis on disparities based on race, color, disability status, national origin, age, religion, sex, and/or familial status.

In response to concerns raised by those who shared testimony with the Committee, the Committee made recommendations directed to federal, state, and local entities to provide support for indigent legal defense services in Maine. Specific recommendations are detailed in the report and include a request for the U.S. Department of Justice to investigate whether Maine is providing effective and meaningful representation to indigent clients, along with requests to the Maine Legislature and Governor Mills to develop a hybrid public defender system that includes dedicated public defenders and private attorneys that have appropriate funding, training, supervision, and monitoring to promote parity between defense counsel and prosecutors so that indigent defendants receive high quality representation.

The Committee is deeply concerned by worsening conditions for indigent defendants in Maine, and notes that the ongoing indigent legal representation issues in Maine will not be solved until Maine commits to providing adequate funding for meaningful and effective legal services to poor defendants.

Committee Chair Samantha Le said, “The Maine Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights is honored to submit its report on the right to criminal legal defense in Maine. We sincerely thank the speakers who took the time to share their experiences, expertise, and knowledge as we undertook this study. We hope the findings and recommendations found in our report drive meaningful change for individuals in need of indigent legal defense services in Maine.”

Press Release

Report

Maine

-  All News 
-  Commission News 
-  Advisory Committees News 
-  Correspondence 
-  Videos 
-  Archives
# C_2021222DE.01003701.xml

| 11.6.2021 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | C 222/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2021

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

C 222/37

---

Berichtigung der Bekanntmachung der Kommission — Leitfaden zur Anwendung der Verordnung (EU) 2019/515 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates über die gegenseitige Anerkennung von Waren, die in einem anderen Mitgliedstaat rechtmäßig in Verkehr gebracht worden sind

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 100 vom 23. März 2021
  )

(2021/C 222/11)

Seite 26, Nummer 3.4.3 Absatz 3 Satz 1:

Anstatt:

„Der Hersteller oder sein entsprechend Bevollmächtigter können in der Erklärung zur gegenseitigen Anerkennung lediglich die in Teil I des Anhangs angeführten Angaben machen (z. B. Art, Beschreibung, Merkmale der Waren, gegebenenfalls die anwendbare Vorschrift in dem Mitgliedstaat, in dem die Waren vorgeblich rechtmäßig in Verkehr gebracht wurden, Konformitätsbewertungsverfahren oder Prüfberichte usw.).“

muss es heißen:

„Der Hersteller oder sein entsprechend Bevollmächtigter kann sich in der Erklärung zur gegenseitigen Anerkennung auf die in Teil I des Anhangs angeführten Angaben beschränken (z. B. Art, Beschreibung, Merkmale der Waren, gegebenenfalls die anwendbare Vorschrift in dem Mitgliedstaat, in dem die Waren vorgeblich rechtmäßig in Verkehr gebracht wurden, Konformitätsbewertungsverfahren oder Prüfberichte usw.).“

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           7,466
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,612
<ALLOWANCES>                                       215
<INVENTORY>                                      6,407
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,260
<PP&E>                                          14,651
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,227
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,998
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,347
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,150
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    39,998
<SALES>                                         50,474
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                50,474
<CGS>                                           17,431
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,431
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                28,168
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 252
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,953
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,953
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,953
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17


</TABLE>