alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1997, AND THE YEAR TO DATE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR
THE PERIOD THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,784
<SECURITIES>                                    22,850
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,165
<ALLOWANCES>                                       123
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,045
<PP&E>                                           2,177
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (187)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  55,758
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,873
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           119
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,639
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    55,758
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,615
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,392
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   999
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 412
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (468)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (468)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (468)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2021034EN.01000201.xml

| 1.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 34/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 34/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9843 — Colony Capital/PSP/NGD)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 34/02)

On 7 July 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9843. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9843. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheet as of June 30, 1999, and the Statement of Operations for the period then
ended and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           5,243
<SECURITIES>                                     9,977
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,950
<ALLOWANCES>                                       150
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,409
<PP&E>                                           6,285
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,337
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  27,011
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,675
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           136
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,709
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    27,011
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,636
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,671
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,882
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (27,089)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (27,089)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (27,889)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.11)


</TABLE>
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2021279EN.01001301.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 13.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 279/13 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10293 — Gilde Fund VI/EDCO)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 279/06)

1.

On 1 July 2021, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2021279EN.01001301-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Gilde Buy-Out Fund VI C.V. and Gilde Buy-Out Fund VI2C.V., jointly referred to as ‘Gilde Fund VI’ (Netherlands), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Jadi International S.A., ‘EDCO’ (Luxembourg). |

Gilde Fund VI acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of EDCO.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for Gilde Fund VI: investing, as a private equity fund, in mid-market companies that are active in various sectors in Europe, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for EDCO: wholesale distribution of non-food fast moving consumer goods, both private label and branded, mainly to large retail chains and petrol stations across Europe. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2021279EN.01001301-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10293 — Gilde Fund VI/EDCO

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2021279EN.01001301-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2021279EN.01001301-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
# CI2021367EN.01000101.xml

| 13.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 367/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 367/1

---

Notice for the attention of the persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/1470, and in Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1464 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

(2021/C 367 I/01)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons and entities that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/1470 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1464 (4) concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.

The Council of the European Union, after having reviewed the list of persons and entities designated in the above-mentioned Annexes, has determined that the restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2014/145/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 should continue to apply to those persons and entities.

The attention of the persons and entities concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the web sites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).

The persons and entities concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address before 2 November 2021:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1.C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1.C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The attention of the persons and entities concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council's decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 16.

(2)  OJ L 321, 13.9.2021, p. 32.

(3)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 6.

(4)  OJ L 321, 13.9.2021, p. 1.

---
Rebecca L. /s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 5, 2015

No. 04-15-00551-CV

Richard Matthew VILLARREAL,

Appellant

v.

Rebecca L. VILLARREAL,

Appellee

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CI-18202

Honorable Gloria Saldana, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The clerk’s record was due September 29, 2015, but was not filed. On September 30, 

2015, the clerk filed a notification of late record stating the clerk’s record was not filed because 

appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee to prepare the record and 

appellant is not entitled to the record without paying the fee. 

We therefore ORDER appellant to provide written proof to this court on or before 

October 15, 2015 that either (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements satisfactory to the 

clerk have been made to pay the clerk’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to the clerk’s record 

without prepayment of the clerk’s fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1, 35.3(a). If appellant fails to file 

such proof within the time provided, this appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b).

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel and the 

district clerk. 

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 5th day of October, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 174 (Monday, September 13, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50928-50929]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19655]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #17131 and #17132; California Disaster Number CA-
00342]


Administrative Declaration of a Disaster for the State of 
California

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a 
disaster for the State of California dated 09/02/2021.
    Incident: Beckwourth Complex Fire.
    Incident Period: 07/03/2021 through 08/31/2021.

DATES: Issued on 09/02/2021.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/01/2021.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/02/2022.

ADDRESS:  Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster 
loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally 
announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Lassen.
Contiguous Counties:
    California: Modoc, Plumas, Shasta, Sierra.
    Nevada: Washoe.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere.................      3.250
  Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      1.625
  Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere.................      5.760

[[Page 50929]]

 
  Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      2.880
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere...      2.000
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.000
For Economic Injury:
  Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit      2.880
   Available Elsewhere.......................................
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 17131 5 
and for economic injury is 17132 0.
    The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are California, 
Nevada.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Isabella Guzman,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2021-19655 Filed 9-10-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Harold L. ANDERSON, Private, U. S. Army, Appellant.

No. 30,215.

U. S. Court of Military Appeals.

July 25, 1975.

*Lieutenant Colonel James Kucera, Captain Paul C. Hemmer,*and *Captain John R. Osgood*were on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel Donald W. Hansen*was on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

*87OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

The conviction of this appellant by a special court-martial of three specifications of assault and battery in violation of Article 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 928, has resulted in a sentence which, as approved and affirmed below, includes a bad-conduct discharge.

When initially forwarding these charges to the convening authority, the appellant’s battalion commander, a lieutenant colonel, recommended that the appellant be eliminated from the service and that he be tried by a special court-martial authorized to adjudge a bad-conduct discharge. Later, however, this same officer appeared as a defense witness and testified on appellant’s behalf during the sentencing portion of the trial. After relating various matters favorable to the appellant, the battalion commander further explained:

> [Djuring my visitations [to the stockade], I began to develop reservations about submission of a request for a BCD. After I looked at the charge sheet I felt I was obligated by the Code to go ahead and do that. . . . The man has the possibility to be a good soldier.

Thereafter, the military judge, when announcing the imposed sentence, specifically indicated that he was relying heavily on the testimony of the battalion commander in making a concurrent recommendation to the convening authority that the bad-conduct discharge portion of his adjudged sentence be suspended.

Although the review of the staff judge advocate in this case noted the military judge’s recommendation for suspension and adequately summarized much of the favorable testimony offered by the appellant’s battalion commander, no mention was made about that portion of the battalion commander’s testimony which set forth his reasons for his original recommendation and his subsequent reservations thereof. In view of the recommendation of the military judge to suspend the bad-conduct discharge, which was directly predicated at least in material part upon that testimony so omitted from the review, we find this to be prejudicial error. *See United States v. Arnold,*21 U.S.C.M.A. 151, 44 C.M.R. 205 (1972); *United States v. Rivera,*20 U.S.C.M.A. 6, 42 C.M.R. 198 (1970).

The decision of the Army Court of Military Review is reversed. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army for a new post-trial review and action by a different convening authority.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**








**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**





I,
      Michael Lewis, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
      of
      eLinear, Inc. on Form 10-QSB/A (Third Amendment) for the quarterly period ended
      March 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
      Form 10-QSB/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition
      and results of operations of eLinear, Inc.





Date:
      April 10, 2006











By:
      _/s/  Michael Lewis_______


Michael
      Lewis


Chief
      Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 11.1

                             STORM TECHNOLOGY, INC.
                  CALCULATION OF PRO FORMA NET LOSS PER SHARE
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)


                                            YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                           -------------------------
                                               1996          1995
                                           ------------   ----------
Weighted Average Common and Common
 Equivalent Shares:
 Series A Preferred Stock...............           563          750
 Series B Preferred Stock...............            90          120
 Series C Preferred Stock...............           614          818
 Series D Preferred Stock...............           518          446
 Series E Preferred Stock...............         3,087        3,877
 Series F Preferred Stock...............            68           30
 Common Stock...........................         3,533        1,230
 Common Stock Options...................           229          305
 Warrants...............................             9           12
                                              --------      -------
                                                 8,711        7,588
                                              ========      =======

Net Loss................................      $(10,424)     $(3,396)
                                              ========      =======

Pro forma net loss per common and             $  (1.20)     $ (0.45)
 common equivalent share................      ========      =======
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 5, 2019

No. 04-18-00473-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF B.W.C., A CHILD,

From the County Court, Jim Wells County, Texas

Trial Court No. 11-06-50160-CV

Honorable David A. Sanchez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

The court has considered the appellant’s motion for en banc reconsideration and the 

motion is DENIED.

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 5th day of March, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court