alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                                                                    Exhibit (27)

                        Paragon Acquisition Company, Inc.

                             Financial Data Schedule
                      For The Year Ended December 31, 1998

THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS  FOR THE YEAR  ENDED  DECEMBER  31,  1998,  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                            8,097
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 33,057
<PP&E>                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  167,669
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           219,825
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                         34,141
<OTHER-SE>                                      (86,297)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    167,669
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      0
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   117,881
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                9,160
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (127,041)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (127,041)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.04)
        

</TABLE>
Listen

# Briefing Reports

-    First  
-    Previous  
-   ...  
-  2 
-  3 
-  4 
-  5 
-  6 
-   ...  
-   Next  
-   Last  

-  All Reports 
-  Annual Statutory Enforcement 
-  Briefing Reports 
-  Advisory Committees Reports 
-  Budget and Performance 
-  FOIA Reports 
-  Data Inventory Program 
-  Civil Rights Complaints 
-  Historical Publications 
-  Archives
## 1998 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

10-16-1998 

# J ohnson v . H or n
P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : D ocke t 97-3581,97-3582

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . v i l l a no v a . e du/thir dc ir c uit_1998

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no va U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 1998 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no va U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min

. C a rl s on@l a

w . v i l l a no va . e du

. 

## Re c omme nde d C it a t ion

" J o hn s on v . H or n " (1998). 1998 D e cisio n s . P ape r 248. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w . v i l l a no v a . e du/thir dc ir c uit_1998/248

### Filed October 16, 1998

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT Nos. 97-3581, 97-3582 JEFFREY E. JOHNSON; BRUCE HOWARD SHORE, Appellants in No. 97-3581

v. MARTIN F. HORN; RAYMOND J. SOBINA, Appellants in No. 97-3582 On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (D.C. No. 96-cv-00318J) Argued: June 10, 1998 Before: BECKER, Chief Judge, ALDISERT and WEIS, Circuit Judges (Filed: October 16, 1998)
ORDER AMENDING SLIP OPINION IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Slip Opinion filed in these cases on July 28, 1998, be amended as follows : Page 21, line 1: Delete "enjoining" and substitute therefore "constituting an injunction and declarato ry judgment requiring." <>BY THE COURT, /s/ Ruggero J. Aldisert Circuit Judge
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Susquehanna River Basin Commission

# AGENCY:

Susquehanna River Basin Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        This notice lists the minor modifications approved for a previously approved project by the Susquehanna River Basin Commission during the period set forth in                         **DATES**                        .                    

# DATES:

August 1-31, 2021.

# ADDRESSES:

Susquehanna River Basin Commission, 4423 North Front Street, Harrisburg, PA 17110-1788.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Jason E. Oyler, General Counsel, telephone: (717) 238-0423, ext. 1312; fax: (717) 238-2436; email:                         *joyler@srbc.net.*                         Regular mail inquiries may be sent to the above address.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This notice lists previously approved projects, receiving approval of minor modifications, described below, pursuant to 18 CFR 806.18 or to Commission Resolution Nos. 2013-11 and 2015-06 for the time period specified above:

## Minor Modification Issued Under 18 CFR 806.18

1. Seneca Resources Company, LLC, Docket No. 20210611, Sergeant and Norwich Townships, McKean County, Pa.; approval authorizing the additional water use purpose for hydrostatic testing; Approval Date: August 18, 2021.

*Authority:*                     Public Law 91-575, 84 Stat. 1509                     *et seq.,*18 CFR parts 806, 807, and 808.                

Dated: September 9, 2021.

Jason E. Oyler,

General Counsel and Secretary to the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2021-19769 Filed 9-13-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7040-01-P
- Skip to Primary Navigation
      - Skip to Main Content
      - Skip to Footer

          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   

        -  Water & Power            - Dams
          - Powerplants
          - Projects
          - Agrimet/Hydromet
          - Water Operations 
        -  Resources & Research            - Programs
          - Technical Service Center
          - Research & Development
          - Reclamation Manual
          - Environmental Resources/Reports
          - Library 
        -  About Us            - Mission/Vision
          - Fact Sheet
          - Commissioner
          - Addresses/Contacts
          - Organizational Chart
          - Leadership Bios
          - Employment
          - Contact 
        -  Recreation & Public Use            - Find Recreation
          - Recreation.gov
          - Public Use 
        -  News & Multimedia            - News Releases
          - News Stories
          - Speeches
          - Congressional Testimony
          - Fact Sheets
          - Photos
          - Multimedia
          - Social Media 

# Youth

              - Reclamation
              - Youth
              - Education

YOUTH              - Youth
              - Recreation
              - Education                  - History
                - What Reclamation does? 
              - Volunteer
              - Employment
              - Contact
              - News

## Education

Reclamation has many opportunities for you to learn about issues effecting water management in the western United States.

You can learn about the robust history of the Bureau of Reclamation and how it helped build the economy of the western United States since its authorization in 1902 and became the largest wholesale water supplier in the Nation.

You can find out about Reclamation visitor centers at its facilities throughout the West and other opportunities to learn about water management.

You can learn about how Reclamation addresses issues in the West. This includes water management, hydropower, invasive quagga and zebra mussels, river restoration and climate change.

Finally, learn about how to protect yourself by not swimming or wading through a canal with Otto the Otter.

*Last Updated: 2/27/20*
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-30004 Summary Calendar

ALEX LEE HUBBARD, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus SUB SEA INTERNATIONAL; ET AL., Defendants,

versus ROBERT L. HACKETT, Movant-Appellant,

versus DAVID W. OESTREICHER, II, Movant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 91-CV-4022

- - - - - - - - - - December 26, 1997 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Robert L. Hackett appeals the district court’s order allocating attorney’s fees among himself, David W. Oestreicher,No. 97-30004 -2- II, and John Sullivan, and imposing Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 sanctions against Hackett. Hackett argues that the district court abused its discretion in allowing Oestreicher to intervene in the underlying action. The district court did not abuse its discretion in allowing Oestreicher to intervene in the underlying action to protect his interest in the contingency fee contract. See Gaines v. Dixie Carriers, Inc. , 434 F.2d 52, 53 (5th Cir. 1970); Keith v. St. George Packing Co. , 806 F.2d 525, 526 (5th Cir. 1986). Hackett argues that the district court erred in allocating the attorney’s fees in the underlying case between himself, Oestreicher, and Sullivan. Because Hackett did not present any evidence in the district court regarding the percentage of work performed by the attorneys before or after the November 15, 1993, partnership dissolution agreement, the district court did not err in allocating the attorney’s fees in accordance with the terms of the dissolution agreement. Hackett argues that the district court abused its discretion in imposing Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 sanctions against him. Hackett failed to comply with the district court’s order to file an accounting of the fees and costs incurred in the instant case even after the magistrate judge allowed him an additional ten days to do so. Therefore, the district court’s order imposing Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 sanctions was well within the district court’s discretion. See FDIC v. Conner , 20 F.3d 1376, 1380 (5th Cir.No. 97-30004 -3- 1994).
AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1

Dover Motorsports, Inc.

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Dover Motorsports, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Denis McGlynn, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                          
|--------------------------
|Dated: March 13, 2006     
|                          
|/s/ Denis McGlynn         
|Denis McGlynn             
|President, Chief Executive
|Officer and Director      

This certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in
such a filing.
# C_2021154EN.01001401.xml

| 30.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 154/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 154/14

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10224 — OTPP/Nikky Investments/Logoplaste)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 154/08)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan Board (‘OTPP’, Canada), |
| --- | --- |

—

Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan Board (‘OTPP’, Canada),

| — | Nikky Investments S.A. (‘Nikky Investments’, Luxembourg), controlled by Mr. Filipe Maurício de Botton, |
| --- | --- |

—

Nikky Investments S.A. (‘Nikky Investments’, Luxembourg), controlled by Mr. Filipe Maurício de Botton,

| — | Logoplaste Parent S.à.r.l. (‘Logoplaste’, Luxembourg), controlled by The Carlyle Group. |
| --- | --- |

—

Logoplaste Parent S.à.r.l. (‘Logoplaste’, Luxembourg), controlled by The Carlyle Group.

OTPP and Nikky Investments acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of Logoplaste.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | for OTPP: the administration of pension benefits and the investment of pension plan assets on behalf of active and retired teachers in the Canadian province of Ontario, |
| --- | --- |

—

for OTPP: the administration of pension benefits and the investment of pension plan assets on behalf of active and retired teachers in the Canadian province of Ontario,

| — | for Nikky Investments: operating as an investment vehicle owned by members of the founding family of the Logoplaste Group, |
| --- | --- |

—

for Nikky Investments: operating as an investment vehicle owned by members of the founding family of the Logoplaste Group,

| — | for Logoplaste: manufacturing of rigid plastic packaging solutions. |
| --- | --- |

—

for Logoplaste: manufacturing of rigid plastic packaging solutions.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10224 — OTPP/Nikky Investments/Logoplaste

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH EX REL. SHAWN 

MICHAEL SIMMS,

Petitioner

v.

MARK GARMAN, SUPERINTENDENT,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 26 WM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2nd day of May, 2017, the Application for Leave to File Original 

Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 15

- 14660 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:14

- cr
- 00059

- WSD

- CMS

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus HERSCHELL HARVELL, JR.,
Defendant

- Appellant.

_ _______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia

________________________ ( October 21, 2016 )
Before WILSON , WILLIAM PRYOR and ROSENBAUM , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Case: 15-14660 Date Filed: 10/21/2016 Page: 1 of 32 Herschell Harvell Jr. appeals his sentence of imp risonment for 32 months for
two convictions of making false statements to a financial institution, 18 U.S.C. § 1014. The district court increase d Harvell’s offense level by two points for his use of a special skill in committing the offenses, U.S.S.G. § 3B 1.3 . Harvell argues
th at his previous employment with the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of the Inspector General , d id not give him a special
skill. We affirm.
We review for clear error the finding that Harvell us ed a special skill.
United States v. De la Cruz Suarez , 601 F.3d 1202, 1219 (11th Cir. 2010). The district court did not clearly err in enhanc ing Harvell ’s base offense
level for his use of a special skill in fraud investigations to help him comm it the
offenses of conviction. T he average person would lack intimate knowledge of loan
and real estate procedures. United States v. Calderon , 127 F.3d 1314, 1339 (11th
Cir. 1997)

. But Harvell worked for the Housing Department for 15 years, which
made his training “substantial.” U.S .S.G. § 3B1.3, c m t. n.4. H e knew various “tricks of the trade” regarding mortgage fraud. Calderon , 127 F.3d at 1339. And he used that special skill “in a manner that significantly facilitated the commission o r
concealment of the offense.” U.S.S.G. § 3B1.3. H e concealed or misrepresented assets, income, living expenses , and business ownership. A nd the district court was

Case: 15-14660 Date Filed: 10/21/2016 Page: 2 of 33 entitled to find that he did so in a way that only a seasoned fraud inve stigator
would know how to do. W e aff irm.
AFFIRMED. Case: 15-14660 Date Filed: 10/21/2016 Page: 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         181,299
<SECURITIES>                                   105,998
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,958,141
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,396,791
<PP&E>                                         643,588
<DEPRECIATION>                                  74,320
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,828,290
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,321,986
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        40,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,828,290
<SALES>                                     18,067,786
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,067,786
<CGS>                                       17,394,372
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,071,628
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              54,585
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (42,606)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (14,500)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (28,106)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (28,106)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

December 27, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129374 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

ANGELA MATUSCAK,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 129374 

 COA: 261319 

Macomb CC: 04-001156-NI 

WALGREEN CO., 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 19, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s1219 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 27, 2005 

Clerk
# C_2021398EN.01000501.xml

| 1.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10229 – Allianz/Aviva Italia)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 398/04)

On 29 June 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10229. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10229. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---