alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                SECTION 906 OF
                        THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



           In connection with the Quarterly Report of Blount International, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Calvin E. Jenness, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the report.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Blount International, Inc. and will be retained by Blount
International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.


Date:  November 19, 2004


/s/ Calvin E. Jenness
---------------------
Calvin E. Jenness
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
EXHIBIT 9
                                                                       ---------

[LETTERHEAD OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP]

                                                   PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
                                                   CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
                                                   111 5th Avenue SW, Suite 3100
                                                   Calgary, Alberta
                                                   Canada T2P 5L3
                                                   Telephone +1 (403) 509 7500
                                                   Facsimile +1 (403) 781 1825




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
-------------------------------

We consent to the use of our report dated February 19, 2004, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Canadian Natural Resources Limited included
in its Annual Report (Form 40-F) for the year ended December 31, 2003 and
incorporated by reference in its Registration Statement on Form F-9
(Registration No. 333-104919), filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.


/s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Calgary, Alberta
April 9, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   100
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       100
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        



</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 1371** 

DAMIEN BARKER , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. COMPUTER SCIENCE CORPORATION , Defendant

- Appellee
. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. Liam O’ Grady , District Judge. ( 1:13

- cv - 00857

- LO

- MSN )

Submitted : August 20, 2015 Decided: August 24, 2015

Before DUNCAN , KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Damien Barker , Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Richard Ward, III , KULLMAN LAW FIRM , New Orleans, Louisiana; Frank Daniel Wood, Jr. , KULLMAN FIRM , Birmingham, Alabama, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
D amien Barker appeals the district court’s order granting Computer Science Corporation’s summary judgment motion on his harassment and discriminatory and retaliatory termination claims, brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981 ( 2012 ). We have reviewed the reco rd and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment
. Barker v. Computer Science Corp. , No. 1:13

- cv - 00857 ( E. D. Va. Mar. 27, 2015 ). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pr esented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Listen

# U.S. Virgin Islands Advisory Committee Community Forum

The U.S. Virgin Islands Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights recently released a report following a series of public meetings and a collection of testimony provided by subject-matter experts. The report explores the current political and legal status of the U.S. Virgin Islands and the inequality suffered by the U.S. Citizens who reside there. It also contains an examination of the break in the long tradition of granting statehood to territories, and the reality of 21st century colonialism in the territories.

In continuation of the report, the Committee will hold a community forum to discuss the major findings on the topic and hear from members of the public regarding their perspectives, experiences, or civil rights concerns. The forum will be conducted in a hybrid format on the following date and time. You may attend in person at either of the university’s campus locations listed below or participate virtually via Zoom:

**WHEN:** Wednesday, April 10, 2024, from 12:00 p.m. to 1:00 p.m. Atlantic Time**WHERE:** Albert A. Sheen Campus, St. Croix (University of Virgin Islands)2 Golden Grove, UVI Theater 401, Kingshill, USVI 00850

Orville E. Kean Campus, St. Thomas (University of Virgin Islands)2 John Brewers Bay, UVI 13D Research and Strategy Innovation Center, St. Thomas, USVI 00802

**To attend virtually, please register here:**https://bit.ly/3IJfRPi

After the Committee’s presentation, Chair Pamela Colon will open the floor for members of the public to offer comments. Members of the public will be invited to speak in the order interest indicated. Each individual will have up to five minutes to share comments. If there is insufficient time available to hear all remarks during the live forum, individuals are encouraged to submit written comment to Sarah Villanueva at svillanueva@usccr.gov within 30 days of the Committee’s forum.

Individuals requiring additional accommodations should contact Sarah Villanueva at least 10 calendar days prior to the meeting at svillaneuva@usccr.gov. Meeting materials will be publicly available in the U.S. Virgin Islands Advisory Committee Public Folder.

Wednesday, April 10, 2024 - 12:00 PM

Press Release

U.S. Virgin Islands

-  Event Calendar 
-  Public Briefings 
-  Commission Business Meetings 
-  Advisory Committees Meetings 
-  Archives
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 **

**OF      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

|   | 1. | The                Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section                13(a) or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in                all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Company. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                Daniel R. Baty      |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   | Daniel                R. Baty          |
|   | Chief                Executive Officer |
|   | August                12, 2005         |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>        5
<LEGEND>
Exhibit 27  Financial Data Schedule

This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's unaudited financial statements at September 30, 1996 and 1997, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements. 
       
<S>                            <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1996             SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                            3,500,574               1,681,894
<SECURITIES>                              0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                        23,476                  11,451
<ALLOWANCES>                              0                       0
<INVENTORY>                         147,373                  98,710
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  3,820,796               1,893,710
<PP&E>                              119,443                 132,109
<DEPRECIATION>                      (33,519)                (57,173)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    4,349,065               2,421,065
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               279,908                 185,383
<BONDS>                                   0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0                       0
<PREFERRED>                               0                       0
<COMMON>                              2,883                   2,906
<OTHER-SE>                        6,302,092               6,320,292
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      4,349,065               2,421,065
<SALES>                           2,736,285               2,256,927
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  2,847,266               2,320,712
<CGS>                               375,945                 317,936
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     4,375,918               3,214,087
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    714,946                 544,766
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    4,259                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (1,532,911)               (893,375)
<INCOME-TAX>                          3,605                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (1,532,911)               (893,375)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0                       0
<CHANGES>                                 0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                     (1,536,516)               (893,375)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         (0.58)                  (0.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (0.58)                  (0.31)
        

</TABLE>
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Dismissed , Motion for Temporary Relief Denied as Moot, and Memorandum Opinion filed January 15, 2015

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 14

- 01013

- CV

IN RE CHRISTOPHER SP ATES , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT O F HABEAS CORPUS 247th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2001

- 61475



### MEMORANDUM OPINION
On December 29, 2014, relator Christopher Spates filed a petition for writ of
habeas c orpus in this c ourt. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (W est 2004) ; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to order his release
from confinement in the Harris County Jail for contempt based on an order issued by the 247th District Court of Harris County. Relator also filed with thi s court a motion for temporary relief. On December 29, 2014, relator asked this court to2 order his release from confinement, pending disposition by this court of relator’s petition for writ of habeas corpus, upon his posting of a bond. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(b)(3), 52.10.

O n January 8, 2015 , relator filed a motion to dismiss his petition for writ of habeas corpus . We grant the motion and dismiss relator’s petition for writ of habeas corpus

. We fu rther deny as moot relator’s motion for temporary relief.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce and Wise

.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Herbert Wright, Appellant.

Memorandum: When this appeal was previously before our court *(People v Wright,*105 AD2d 1088), we reserved decision and remitted the matter to the Monroe County Court for a hearing "to reconstruct defendant’s mental capacity at the time of trial by means of contemporaneous observations and records.” Following the reconstruction hearing, the court concluded that "the evidence adduced showed defendant was competent in the months preceding trial and at the time of trial.” We agree that the People met their burden of proving defendant’s competence by a fair preponderance of the evidence *(see, People v Wright, supra; People v Santos,*43 AD2d 73). Since we previously determined that there is no merit to the other issues raised by defendant on appeal *(People v Wright, supra),*the judgment of conviction is affirmed *(see, People v Armlin,*37 NY2d 167; *People v Hudson,*19 NY2d 137, *1016
      *cert denied*398 US 944). (Resubmission of appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Celli, J. — assault, first degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
# C_2021451EN.01000201.xml

| 8.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 451/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 451/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10413 – APOLLO MANAGEMENT / RENO DE MEDICI)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 451/02)

On 8 October 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10413. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10413. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 12, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-51301

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ELZIE ROOSEVELT ROBERTS, JR., also known as Elzie Roosevelt

Roberts,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 6:04-CR-35-1 

--------------------

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Elzie Roosevelt Roberts, Jr., appeals his conviction by a

jury of two counts of possession of an unregistered firearm in

violation of the National Firearms Act, specifically 26 U.S.C. 

§§ 5845(a), 5861(d), and 5871. The district court sentenced

Roberts to concurrent terms of 100 months of imprisonment and

concurrent terms of three years of supervised release. 

Roberts argues that the evidence was insufficient to prove

that he knew of the characteristics of the sawed-off shotgun that
No. 05-51301

-2-

prohibit its possession under § 5861(d). Because Roberts failed

to move for a judgment of acquittal, his sufficiency challenge is

reviewed only for a manifest miscarriage of justice. United

States v. Avants, 367 F.3d 433, 449 (5th Cir. 2004). Such a

miscarriage of justice occurs when the record is “devoid of

evidence of guilt or the evidence [is] so tenuous that a

conviction is shocking.” Id.

The Government was required to prove that Roberts knew of

the features of the weapon that made it a “firearm” under 

§ 5845(a), specifically, that it was a shotgun having an overall

length of less than 26 inches or a barrel of less than 18 inches

in length. Staples v. United States, 511 U.S. 600, 619-20

(1994); United States v. Reyna, 130 F.3d 104, 109-10 (5th Cir.

1997); § 5845(a). The shotgun was admitted into evidence and

could be inspected by the jury. Its barrel was 10-1/2 inches

long and its overall length was only 17 inches. Such

characteristics are readily apparent and externally visible. 

The record is not devoid of evidence of Roberts’s guilt.

Roberts’s conviction does not constitute a manifest miscarriage

of justice. See Staples, 511 U.S. at 616 n.11; Reyna, 130 F.3d

at 109 n.6; Avants, 367 F.3d at 449.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Skip to main content

Privacy Policy•Site map

#  Reports/Statistics

Statistical Report for FY2023

Statistical Report for FY2022

Statistical Report for FY2021

Statistical Report for FY2020

Statistical Report for FY2019

Statistical Report for FY2018

Statistical Report for FY2017

FY16 Annual Judgment Report

Statistical Report for FY2016

Statistical Report for FY2015

FY2015 Annual Judgment Report

Statistical Report for FY2014

FY2014 Annual Judgment Report

Statistical Report for FY2013

FY2013 Annual Judgment Report

Statistical Report for FY2012

FY2012 Annual Judgment Report

Howard T. Markey National Courts Building • 717 Madison Place, NW, Washington, DC 20439 • 202-357-6400
/ 

Ii' 

Karen F. Long, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Hilda Solis, 

Defendant. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Civil Action No. 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

FILED 

DEC 1 0 2010 

Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy 

Courts for the District of Columbia 

10 2100 

This matter is before the Court on its initial review of plaintiff s pro se complaint and 

application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant the in forma pauperis 

application and dismiss the case because the complaint fails to meet the minimal pleading 

requirements of Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

Pro se litigants must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 

656 F. Supp. 237,239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires 

complaints to contain "( 1) a short and plain statement of the grounds for the court's jurisdiction 

[and] (2) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief." 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 

F.3d 661,668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). The Rule 8 standard ensures that defendants receive fair 

notice of the claim being asserted so that they can prepare a responsive answer and an adequate 

defense and determine whether the doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Califano, 75 

F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). 
Plaintiff, a resident of Oxon Hill, Maryland, sues United States Secretary of Labor Hilda 

Solis. The complaint, consisting of scribbling and disjointed phrases, fails to provide any notice 

of a claim or the basis of federal court jurisdiction. 1 A separate Order of dismissal accompanies 

this Memorandum Opinion. 

Date: December~, 2010 

United States District Judge 

1 This complaint is one of nine such submissions received by the Clerk's Office on the 

same day. Each complaint names a different defendant but is otherwise the same. Moreover, 

similar complaints were dismissed in August, September and November ofthis year for the same 

reasons. Plaintiff is warned that her persistence in filing similar lawsuits may result in the 

imposition of restrictions on her ability to file cases in this Court. 

2
NO. 07-03-0364-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL D

	SEPTEMBER 3, 2003

	______________________________

	DAVID GRACIA AND GRACE CONCRETE PRODUCTS, INC.

			Appellants

	v.

	MASHKOOR ALAM

			Appellee

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 359TH DISTRICT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY;

	NO. 02-04-02198-CV; HON. KATHLEEN HAMILTON, PRESIDING

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	Appellants David Gracia and Grace Concrete Products, Inc. filed a notice of appeal on July 24, 2003.  However, they did not pay the $125 filing fee required from appellants pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 5.  Nor did they file an affidavit pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1 relieving appellants of their duty to pay the fee.  By letter from this Court dated August 20, 2003, we informed appellants that “[u]nless the filing fee in the amount of $125.00 is paid by Tuesday, September 2, 2003, the appeal will be subject to dismissal.”  Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c); see Holt v. F. F. Enterprises, 990 S.W.2d 756 (Tex. App.--Amarillo 1998, pet. ref’d).  September second lapsed without the fee being paid.

	Consequently, we dismiss the appeal pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(c). 

							Per Curiam