alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted).

I, Elizabeth McLaughlin, Chief Executive Officer of Hot Topic, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this amendment no. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Hot Topic, Inc.;

2. Based on my
knowledge, this amendment no. 1 to the annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other information included in this amendment no. 1 to the annual report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this amendment no. 1 to the annual report.

Date: February 26, 2010



/s/    ELIZABETH
MCLAUGHLINElizabeth McLaughlinChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)


A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Hot Topic, Inc. and will be retained by Hot Topic, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the amendment no. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Hot Topic, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the amendment no. 1 to the annual
report on Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

I, James McGinty, Chief
Financial Officer of Hot Topic, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this amendment no. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K
of Hot Topic, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this amendment no. 1 to the annual report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

3. Based on my knowledge,
the financial statements, and other information included in this amendment no. 1 to the annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this amendment no. 1 to the annual report.

Date: February 26, 2010



/s/    JAMES MCGINTYJames McGintyChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Hot Topic, Inc. and will be retained by Hot Topic, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the amendment no. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K, is not deemed filed with
the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Hot Topic, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the amendment no. 1 to
the annual report on Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
##### 



STOCK CERTIFICATE CUSIP: 00433N 10 6




---



##### 



ACCESS PLANS USA, INC.
    TEN COM
    
    -
    
    as tenants in commonTEN ENT
    
    -
    
    as tenants by the entiretiesJT TEN
    
    -
    
    as joint tenants with right ofsurvivorship and not as tenantsin common
 UNIF GIFT MIN ACT-
    
    
    
    
    
    Custodian(Cust)
    
    
    
    (Minor)Under Uniform Gifts to MinorsAct(State)UNIF TRNFR MIN ACT-
    
    
    
    
    
    Custodian(Cust)
    
    
    
    (Minor)Under Uniform Transfers to MinorsAct(State)
    
 PLEASE lNSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHERIDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE
 (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE)Sharesof the Common Stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appointattorney-in-factto transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation, with full power of substitution in the premises.
 DatedNOTICE:
    
    THE SIGNATURE(S) TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME(S) AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER.
  ByTHE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS,
SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE
MEDALLION PROGRAM) PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906

 

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002

 

I, Tim Paterson-Brown, Chief Executive Officer ofMedicsight, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the bestof my knowledge:

 

(1)    theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly periodended September 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of  Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));and

 

(2)    theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|                   | By:    | /s/  TIM PATERSON-BROWN  |   |
|------------------------|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|                   |   | Tim  Paterson-Brown      |
|                   |   | Chief  Executive Officer |
| November 14, 2005 |   |

 

E-1

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board

# DATES:

September 28, 2021 at 10:00 a.m.

# ADDRESSES:

                        Telephonic. Dial-in (listen only) information: Number: 1-415-527-5035, Code: 2764 292 5887; or via web:                         *https://tspmeet.webex.com/​tspmeet/​onstage/​g.php?​MTID=​ebf17d11e1e07757af9c76225c94afcef*.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kimberly Weaver, Director, Office of External Affairs, (202) 942-1640.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Board Meeting Agenda

### Open Session

1. Approval of the August 24, 2021 Board Meeting Minutes

2. Monthly Reports

(a) Participant Activity Report

(b) Investment Report

(c) Legislative Report

3. Quarterly Reports

(d) Vendor Risk Management

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b (e)(1).                

Dated: September 15, 2021.

Dharmesh Vashee,

General Counsel, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.

[FR Doc. 2021-20347 Filed 9-20-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
#### FISHER et al., Respondents, v. TUNBRIDGE, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

April, 1896.)

Action by Gonrad J. Fisher and Theodore D. Allen against Spencer J. Tunbridge.

No opinion. Appeal dismissed, with costs.
# CI2021076EN.01000501.xml

| 5.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 76/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 76/5

---

COVID-19 outbreak

(Regulation (EU) 2021/267 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2021 laying down specific and temporary measures in view of the persistence of the COVID-19 crisis concerning the renewal or extension of certain certificates, licences and authorisations, the postponement of certain periodic checks and periodic training in certain areas of transport legislation and the extension of certain periods referred to in Regulation (EU) 2020/698 (1))

(2021/C 76 I/03)

Denmark

Date of the Information to the Commission: 23.2.2021

Denmark has decided, in conformity with the relevant provisions of Regulation (EU) 2021/267 of the European Parliament and of the Council that it shall not apply the following provisions:

| — | Article 4(1) concerning the regular inspections of tachographs in road transport under Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 (2); |
| --- | --- |

—

Article 4(1) concerning the regular inspections of tachographs in road transport under Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 (2);

| — | Article 5(1) concerning the time limits for the periodic roadworthiness tests for motor vehicles and their trailers under Directive 2014/45/EU (3); |
| --- | --- |

—

Article 5(1) concerning the time limits for the periodic roadworthiness tests for motor vehicles and their trailers under Directive 2014/45/EU (3);

| — | Article 5(2) concerning the validity of roadworthiness certificates under Directive 2014/45/EU. |
| --- | --- |

—

Article 5(2) concerning the validity of roadworthiness certificates under Directive 2014/45/EU.

---

(1)  OJ L 60, 22.2.2021, p. 1.

(2)  Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 February 2014 on tachographs in road transport, repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85 on recording equipment in road transport and amending Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport (OJ L 60, 28.2.2014, p. 1).

(3)  Directive 2014/45/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 on periodic roadworthiness tests for motor vehicles and their trailers and repealing Directive 2009/40/EC (OJ L 127, 29.4.2014, p. 51).

---
# C_2021129EN.01000901.xml

| 13.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/9

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10180 — BH Holding/TEDi)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 129/05)

On 24 March 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in German language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10180. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10180. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
THEA~TORNEYGENERLAL OF TEXAS

WILL WI-ON A-mNEYC3ENERAl. April 10, 1961
Honorable H. B. Zachry President,Board of Directors Texas Agriculturaland Mechanical College System BOX2570 San Antonio, Texas OpinionNo. WW-1035 Re: Whether changing the name of the "Agriculturaland Mechanical College of Texas" requires Dear Mr. Zachry: a constitutionalamendment. You have requested an opinion concerningwhether the changing of the name "Agriculturaland Mechanical College of Texas" requires a constitutionalamendment. In Heaton v. Bristol, 317S.W.2d 86, 93 (Civ.App.958 error ref., appeal dism., cert. den., 359 U.S. 230), It was held: "The record shows that the Agricultural and Mechanical College of Texas Is the oldest State-supportedInstitution of higher learning In Texas. It was establishedpursuant to Acts of 1875, pages 72, 74, General Laws of the State of Texas, and the College first opened Its doors in October 1876, and It has been In continuous operation since that time. The statutoryprovisions relating to the College are grouped under Chapter 2, Title 29 of the Revised Civil Statutes of Texas." Section 13 of ArticleVII of the Constitution of Texas recognizes that the Agriculturaland Mechanical College of Texaswas createdprior to the Constitution of 1876 but had not begun operation at the time the Constitution of 1876was adopted (February15, 1876). The Agriculturaland Mechanical College of Texas, being createdby Acts of the Legislature (ChanterXLIV, General Laws of Texas, 1871; Chapter CXXVI, General Laws of Texas, 1871; Chapter LVII, General Laws of Texas (1875) rather thanby a provision of the Constitution ofHonorable H. B. Zachry, Page 2 (WW-1035)

Texas,you are advised that changing the name of the "Agricultural and Mechanical College of Texas" does not require a constitutionalamendmentbut may be doneby an act of the Legislature. SUMMARY

The Agricultural and MechanicalCollege of Texaswas establishedpursuant to Chapter LVII, Acts of 1875, Page 72, General Laws of Texas (Heatonv. Bristol, 317 S.W.2d 86, 93 (Civ.App.1958, error ref., appeal dlsm., cert. den., 359 U.S. 23O), and the changing of the name of the "Agriculturaland Mechanical College of Texas" does not require a constitutional amendment.

Yours very truly,

WILL WILSON Attorney General of Texas

JR:ms John Reeves

APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE W. V. Geppert, Chairman Iola B. Wilcox Robert T. Lewis Vernon 0. Teofan Sam Ray Wilson REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEYGENERAL By: Morgan Nesbitt
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Paid, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned,
in their respective capacities as capacity as President and CEO of the Company
and as CFO of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Gregory Rotman
----------------------------
Gregory Rotman
President and CEO
March 31, 2006


/s/ Richard Rotman
-----------------------------
Richard Rotman
Chief Financial Officer
March 31, 2006
#### LAMBERT, Appellant, v. CARR et al., Respondents.

(Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.

May 11, 1894.)

Action by Henry A. Lambert against George W. Carr and others.

Argued before DALY, C. J., and BOOKSTAVER and PRYOR, JJ.

Wm. A. Abbott, for appellant.

Cantor & Van Schaiek, for respondents.

No opinion. Ordered that the order be reversed, with costs.
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, W. Marston Becker, Acting Chief Executive Officer of LaSalle Re Holdings
Limited, hereby certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or
78o(d)) and that the information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of LaSalle Re Holdings Limited.

Date:  May 15, 2003


/s/ W. Marston Becker
---------------------
W. Marston Becker
Acting Chief Executive Officer
Addendum                                            Confidential
Information


December 12, 1996                            EXHIBIT 10.43


Mr. Kent Leichty
ALDI Inc.
1200 North Kirk Road
Batavia, IL  60510-1477

Dear Kent:

Applied Intelligence Group, Inc. (AIG) is pleased to present this Addendum
(Addendum) to our Arrangement Letter (AL) to ALDI Inc. (ALDI) dated
August 3, 1995 and signed by Mr. Michael Curry on August 22, 1995 for
the purchase of merchandise from AIG.  This Addendum is considered part of,
and is governed by, AIG's AL to ALDI dated August 3, 1995.

DISCOUNTS

This section details the discounts for IBM merchandise AIG will provide to
ALDI within the terms of this Addendum.  Discounts specified in the
August 3, 1995 AL will continue in effect and are restated below.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                Item               Percentage
                                       of
                                    Discounts
                <S>                        <C>
                POS Terminals              37%
                Controller                  9%
                Hardware/Features
</TABLE>

                NOTE:  Final price is calculated by applying the
                discount to the Base/List price, but cannot be less
                than AIG's cost plus 4%.

EXPIRATION OF AGREEMENT

This section replaces the Expiration of Agreement section of AIG's
Arrangement Letter to ALDI dated August 3, 1995.

     The AL will continue in effect until December 31, 1997.  Any
modifications to the agreement are subject to approval by both parties.  The
agreement can be canceled by either party with 30 days written notice.  The
responsibilities for payment of fees, merchandise warranty, all limitations
of liability, all terms regarding ownership of products and techniques, the
rights and remedies clause, resolutions of disputes, hiring of personnel, and
the restrictions regarding confidentiality, shall survive the expiration of
the agreement.

APPROVAL

This Addendum and its terms and conditions are agreed to by both
ALDI Inc. and AIG on this day.

Applied Intelligence Group, Inc.             ALDI Inc.

                /S/Rick Place            /S/Kent Leichty

                  Rick Place                 Kent Leichty
                  Account Executive          Corporate Director Scanning
                                             Systems

                December 12, 1996            Jan 10, 1997




APPLIED INTELLIGENCE GROUP, INC.           1        3800 Benson Road,
Edmond, OK  73013-0417
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 18

- 00277

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from Criminal District Court No. 4

Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. S

- 13313

- 16

Before Womack, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Gabriel, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### $2,126.00 IN 

### U.S. C URRENCY AND 

### 2012 D ODGE 

### C HARGER 

### , Appellant

V



### .

T HE 

### S TATE OF 

### T EXAS 

### , Appellee2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
On February 13, 2019 and M a rch 26, 2019, we notified appellant that his brief

had not been filed as the appellate rule s require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We
stated that we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless , within ten
days, appellant filed with the court an appellant ’ s brief and a n accompanying motion
reasonably explaining the brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See
Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.
Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an
opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appe al for want of
prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Delivered: May 2, 2019
Skip to main content

Privacy Policy•Site map

# Attorney Discipline Opinions

Pursuant to the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims, Rule 83.2(l)(2), the final order or opinion in any attorney discipline case that results in a public reprimand, suspension, or disbarment will be made publicly available in PDF form below beginning January 1, 2016. Attorney discipline orders and opinions issued prior to that date are available to the public upon in-person request at the Clerk's Office.

**Attorney Discipline Opinions**

Case Years 2013-2015

Case Years 2016-2018

Case Years 2019-2021

Case Years 2022-2024

**Reinstatement Orders**

Kenneth A. Martin 13-11157

Karen H. Ross 18-11223

Saavedra Cruz No. 20-11245

Howard T. Markey National Courts Building • 717 Madison Place, NW, Washington, DC 20439 • 202-357-6400
BILLY J. WILLIAMS, OSB #901366 

United States Attorney 

District of Oregon 

ETHAN D. KNIGHT, OSB #992984 

GEOFFREY A. BARROW 

CRAIG J. GABRIEL, OSB #012571 

Assistant United States Attorneys 

ethan.knight@usdoj.gov

geoffrey.barrow@usdoj.gov 

craig.gabriel@usdoj.gov

1000 SW Third Ave., Suite 600 

Portland, OR 97204-2902 

Telephone: (503) 727-1000 

Attorneys for United States of America 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

 v. 

DUANE LEO EHMER, 

JAKE RYAN, 

 Defendants.

3:16-CR-00051-BR

GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO 

PERMIT APPEARANCE OF TRIBAL

REPRESENTATIVE

 The United States of America, by Billy J. Williams, United States Attorney for the 

District of Oregon, and through Ethan D. Knight, Geoffrey A. Barrow, and Craig J. Gabriel, 

Assistant United States Attorneys, hereby moves the Court for an order allowing a representative 

of the Burns Pauite Tribe to speak at the sentencings of defendants Ehmer and Ryan. 

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 2318 Filed 11/09/17 Page 1 of 2
Government’s Motion to Permit Appearance of Tribal Representative Page 2

The government requests that the Court permit a representative to speak at the 

sentencings of defendants Ehmer and Ryan. Because the tribe is not otherwise a named victim 

of the 18 U.S.C. § 1361 count for purposes of the Crime Victims Rights Act, it is the 

government’s request that the Court exercise its discretion and permit a member of the tribe to 

speak regarding the impact of defendants’ conduct. 

The government has conferred with counsel for defendants, and they oppose this motion. 

 Dated this 9th day of November 2017. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

BILLY J. WILLIAMS 

 United States Attorney 

 s/ Ethan D. Knight 

 ETHAN D. KNIGHT, OSB #992984 

 GEOFFREY A. BARROW 

 CRAIG J. GABRIEL, OSB #012571 

 Assistant United States Attorneys 

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 2318 Filed 11/09/17 Page 2 of 2