alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04

- 20

- 00026

- CR
IN RE Detrick DEROVEN Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice Delivered and Filed: February 5, 2020
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DISMISSED AS MOOT
On January 16, 2020 , relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus asserting the Honorable Jefferson Moore has not ruled on relator’s pending “In Omnibus Motion for Inspection/Duplication of the Judicial Record/Information and the Court’s In Camera of Same With Appendix/Affidavit Attached ” ( t he “Omnibus Motion”). Relator also filed a Motion for Leave to File Petition and a Motion to Proceed In F orma Pauperis. We deny as moot relator’s Moti on for Leave because leave is not required to file a petition for writ of mandamus in an intermediate appellate court. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.1; In re Medina , 04

- 19

- 00041

- CR, 2019 WL 360534, at *1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio Jan. 30, 2019, no pet.). We grant relator’s Motion to Proceed In F orma Pauperis.

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 1996

- CR

- 3437

- A, styled The State of Texas v. Detrick Deroven , pending in the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Jefferson Moore presiding.04

- 20

- 00026

- CR

- 2

- On January 28, 2020, t he trial court provided this court with a courtesy copy of the court’s ruling on the Omnibus Motion, which states: “24 Jan 2020 Denied JM.” Because relator obtained the relief requested, we dismiss his petition for writ of mandamus as moot.
PER CURIAM Do not publish
#### Eyal Ovadia et al., Petitioners, v Office of the Industrial Board of Appeals et al., Respondents.

[946 NYS2d 862]

*642Upon remittitur from the Court of Appeals *(Matter of Ovadia v Office of the Indus. Bd. of Appeals,*19 NY3d 138 [2012]), determination of respondent Industrial Board of Appeals, dated December 14, 2009, affirming an order of respondent Commissioner of the Department of Labor directing petitioners to pay the claimants unpaid wages, unanimously annulled, on the law, without costs, and the matter remanded for further proceedings.

The Court of Appeals remitted the matter to this Court with directions to remand to the Industrial Board of Appeals for further proceedings in accordance with Court of Appeals’ opinion, including “a determination of whether Ovadia made an enforceable promise to pay the workers for their continued work following Bruten’s disappearance and whether the workers relied on his promise by continuing to work at the construction site for the following six days” *(id.*at 145). Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Moskowitz, DeGrasse, Freedman and Richter, JJ.
Exhibit 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY
                       REMINGTON PRODUCTS COMPANY, L.L.C.


                  KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE  PRESENTS,  that each person  whose name
appears below  constitutes and appoints  Alexander R. Castaldi,  Allen S. Lipson
and Kris J. Kelley and each of them, his true and lawful  attorneys-in-fact  and
agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for and in his name,
place and stead, in any and all capacities which such person serves or may serve
with respect to Remington Products Company,  L.L.C. and Remington Capital Corp.,
to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Remington Products Company, L.L.C. and
Remington  Capital Corp. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997, and any or
all  amendments to such Annual Report,  and to file the same,  with all exhibits
thereto,  and other documents in connection  therewith,  with the Securities and
Exchange Commission,  granting unto said  attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each
of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite and  necessary to be done in and about the  premises,  as fully to all
intents and  purposes as he might or could do in person,  hereby  ratifying  and
confirming all that said  attorneys-in-fact  and agents or any of them, or their
or his substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

This power of attorney has been signed as of the ____ day of March, 1998, by the
following persons:


/s/ Neil P. DeFeo
-----------------------------------             --------------------------
Neil P. DeFeo,                                  Victor K. Kiam, II,
Chief Executive Officer, President and Director Chairman and Director

/s/ Victor K. Kiam, III                           /s/Robert L. Rosner
-----------------------------------             --------------------------
Victor K. Kiam, III,                            Robert L. Rosner,
Director                                        Director

/s/ Norman W. Alpert                              /s/Kevin Mundt
-----------------------------------             --------------------------
Norman W. Alpert,                               Kevin Mundt,
Director                                        Director

/s/Arthur J. Nagle                                /s/Daniel S. O'Connell
-----------------------------------             --------------------------
Arthur J. Nagle,                                Daniel S. O'Connell,
Director                                        Director

/s/William B. Connell                             /s/Kris J. Kelley
-----------------------------------             --------------------------
William B. Connell,                             Kris J. Kelley,
Director                                        Vice President and Controller

/s/Alexander R. Castaldi
-----------------------------------
Alexander R. Castaldi,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



<PAGE>
# C_2021030EN.01000901.xml

| 27.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/9

---

Publication of the entry in the International Register of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications of ‘ Image 1 ’/‘Kampot Pepper’ pursuant to Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1753 of the European Parliament and of the Council

(Geneva Act of the Lisbon Agreement)

(2021/C 30/08)

On 14 December 2020, in accordance with Article 6(4) of the Geneva Act of the Lisbon Agreement (1), the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) notified the European Union of the following entry in the International Register:

Name: ‘ Image 2 ’/‘Kampot Pepper’

Product type: Pepper

Country of origin: Cambodia

This publication confers the right to oppose the protection of the name within the territory of the European Union, pursuant to Article 6 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1753 of the European Parliament and of the Council (2) and on the grounds set out therein. An opposition may be lodged with the Commission, within four calendar months from today, at:

AGRI-B3-GENEVA@ec.europa.eu

The notification may be consulted in the International Register held by WIPO at the following link:

https://www.wipo.int/cgi-lis/ifetch5?ENG+LISBON+17-00+21650851-KEY+256+0+1138+F-ENG+1+1+1+25+SEP-0/HITNUM,NO,APP-ENG,COO+kampot+

---

(1)  Geneva Act of the Lisbon Agreement on appellations of origin and geographical indications (OJ L 271, 24.10.2019, p. 15).

(2)  Regulation (EU) 2019/1753 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2019 on the action of the Union following its accession to the Geneva Act of the Lisbon Agreement on Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications (OJ L 271, 24.10.2019, p. 1).

---
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionsho uld not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except und er the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 30995 Su m m ar yC al endar
UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee
v. T IM M IE F O R D , D e fe nda nt
- Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f ort he W es t er n D i st r i c tof Loui si ana U SD C N o. 5: 97- C R
- 50040- 1
B e fo r e B E N AV ID E S , P R A D O , a n d S O U T H W IC K , C ir c u it J u d g e s . P E R C U R I A M: * T i m m i e F ord, federal pri soner # 09 6 1 5 -0 3 5 , f i l ed a m ot i on f

or a r edu ced sentence pu rsuan tto 1 8 U
. S
. C
. § 3582 ( c) ( 2) i n w h i ch h e sough ta sentence redu c t i o n b as e d o n Am e ndm en t706 t o t h e F ederal Sen t en ci n g G u i del i n es, w h i ch r e duc e d t he b as e o f

fe ns e l e ve lf

o rm o s tcr ac k c o c ai ne o f fe ns e s . Fo r d a ppe al s t he di s t r i c tc o ur t ’ s de ni alo f t hatm o t i o n. F ord ’ s ar gu m en t t h a t Un ite dS ta te s v . B o o k e r, 543 U
. S
. 220 ( 200 5) app l i es i n the contextof § 3 582 ( c) ( 2) proceedi n gs i s un ava i l i n g i n l i gh tof Un i t ed S t ate s United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D November

5, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 08- 30995

2 v . D o u b lin , 5 7 2 F .3d 2 3 5 , 2 3 8 -3 9 (5t h C ir. 2 0 0 9 ). A l so , For d’ s se nten ce w as bas ed upon t he c ar ee r of fender gui del i ne. B ec ause Ford’ s gui del i nes r ange w as notder i ved f

r om t he quanti t y of c r ac k c oc ai ne i nvol ved i n t he of fens e, For d w as no ts e nt e nc e d b as e d o n a s e nt e nc i ng r ang e t hatw as l o w e r e d b y t he Se nt e nc i ng C om m i ssi on t h rough A m en dm en t7 06. T h e d i st ri ctcou rttheref ore d i d n oterr in d e n y in gF o r d ’ s § 3 5 8 2 (c )(2 ) m o tio n . S ee§ 3 5 8 2 ( c ) ( 2 ) ; U. S
. S
. G. § 1 B 1 .10 (a )(2)(B ). AF F I RMED.
# C_2009062EN.01001501.xml

| 17.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 62/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 62/15

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5409 — Strabag/Kemna/Wellmann)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 62/04)

On 4 March 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5049. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5049. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7030

LINUS ROMEY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

J. VANYUR, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-657-5-BR)

Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 6, 1999

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Linus Romey, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver, Assistant

United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Linus Romey appeals the district court’s order denying relief

on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation

of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Romey v.

Vanyur, No. CA-97-657-5-BR (E.D.N.C. May 26, 1998). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2021472EN.01000101.xml

| 23.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 472/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 472/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case 10468 – NREP / NOVO HOLDINGS / INDUSTRIENS PENSIONSFORSIKRING / JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 472/01)

On 16 November 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10468. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10468. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2250 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                                                     December 10, 2015.
    Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 
2250) entitled ``An Act making appropriations for the Legislative 
Branch for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2016, and for other 
purposes.'', do pass with the following

                              AMENDMENTS:

            Strike all after the enacting clause and insert the 
      following:

That the Continuing Appropriations Act, 2016 (Public Law 114-53) is 
amended by striking the date specified in section 106(3) and inserting 
``December 16, 2015''.
            This Act may be cited as the ``Further Continuing 
        Appropriations Act, 2016''.

            Amend the title so as to read: ``Further Continuing 
        Appropriations Act, 2016''.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
114th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H.R. 2250

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENTS
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1199

JOHN RODGERS BURNLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DIANE L. SCHROEDER,

Chief Primary Care Physician; NAVREET K.

KALLAR, M.D.; CAROLYN JOHNSON, Nurse; HUNTER

HOLMES MCGUIRE VETERANS ADMINISTRATION MEDICAL

CENTER; DIRECTOR OF HUNTER HOLMES MCGUIRE

VETERANS ADMINISTRATION MEDICAL CENTER,

individual capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior

District Judge. (3:05-cv-00554-RLW)

Submitted: September 20, 2006 Decided: October 4, 2006

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Rodgers Burnley, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Holland Hambrick,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

John Rodgers Burnley appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his complaint alleging violations of his civil

rights by employees at the Hunter Holmes McGuire Veterans

Administration Medical Center. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. See Burnley v. United States, No.

3:05-cv-00554-RLW (E.D. Va. Dec. 15, 2005). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# L_2009311EN.01002101.xml

| 26.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 311/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 311/21

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1137/2009

of 25 November 2009

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Insalata di Lusia (PGI))

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) and in accordance with Article 17(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Insalata di Lusia’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) and in accordance with Article 17(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Insalata di Lusia’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 November 2009.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 89, 18.4.2009, p. 13.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

ITALY

Insalata di Lusia (PGI)

---
Opinion issued December 31, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals

For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01

- 15

- 01040

- CR

——————————— IN RE TIMOTHY DEWAYN E WRIGHT , Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator, Timothy Dewayne Wright, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus

to compel the respondent to hear his motions to suppress and applications for writ

of habeas corpus. 1 The petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

1 The underlying case is State v. Timothy Dewayne Wright , cause number 1443972
, pending in the 351st District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Mark Ellis presiding.2 PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Higley, Huddle, and Lloyd.

Do not publish. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).
Listen

# Event Calendar

View Commission business meeting dates for 2024

----

-    First  
-    Previous  
-  1 
-  2 
-  3 
-   ...  
-   Next  
-   Last  

-  Event Calendar 
-  Public Briefings 
-  Commission Business Meetings 
-  Advisory Committees Meetings 
-  Archives 

## Filter Options
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Human Genome Research Institute Initial Review Group Genome Research Study Section.                    

*Date:*                         November 4-5, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Suite 3100, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Keith McKenney, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Suite 3100, Bethesda, MD 20817, 301-594-4280,                         *mckenneyk@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.172, Human Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 14, 2021. 

David W. Freeman,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-20186 Filed 9-16-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P