alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021117EN.01000101.xml

| 6.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 117/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 117/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10119 — Deme Concessions/CDC/Région Occitanie/Port-La Nouvelle)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 117/01)

On 29 March 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10119. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10119. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### Rogers *v.*McGuire *et al.*

*(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.*

July 18, 1890.)

Mechanics’ Liens—Payments.

An action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien on a house and lot involved the issue whether plaintiff was entitled to the second payment of the contract price which was due “when.cornice is set, siding on, and floors laid. ” It appeared that a small portion of the siding which could better be done at a later stage of the work, had been omitted, and that the owner made no objection to the omission, but promised payment. *Neld,*that a finding that the payment was due would not be disturbed.

Appeal from special term, Westchester county.

Action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien filed by George A. Rogers against Hannah McGuire, the owner of the premises, William McGuire, her husband, and others. From the judgment entered therein, defendant Hannah McGuire appeals.

Argued before Barnard, P. J., and Pratt, J.

*Pforman A. Lawlor,*for appellant. *L. C. & W. P. Platt,*for respondent.

Barnard, P. J.

The principal question in this case was one of fact. The plaintiff is a builder, and the defendant McGuire owned a lot of land upon which the plaintiff agreed to erect a building for an agreed price. The first payment, of $1,500, was paid. The second payment, of $2,000, was due “ when cornice is set, siding on, and floors laid.” Proof was given tending to show that the payment was due and payable; that the work called for was done, and the certificate of the architect delivered; that a portion of the siding was not on, but this could be better done at a later stage of the work; and that a full performance in this respect was waived. Notwithstanding this, the owner refused to pay the installment, and the contractors stopped work. The architect testified that the siding, omitted was small spaces between the stone front, and that the stone front was to be put up first. This was included in the third payment. The owner at first made no objection to the omission, but promised payment of the second installment. The trial court could not therefore find otherwise than that the second payment was due and payable. The plaintiff proved extra work beyond this to support the finding of the court that there was due at the time of the breach of the contract the sum of $2,500, with interest thereon from 27th April, 1887. Whether the building was larger than the specification called for, and what it would cost to furnish it, and whether the work was well done or not upon it, were questions which became subjects of contradictory proof. The proof supports the finding upon the questions so far as the same are involved in the case. The judgment should therefore be affirmed, with costs.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2236 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2236

 To direct the Secretary of Agriculture, acting through the Animal and 
   Plant Health Inspection Service, to submit to Congress, and make 
available to the public on the Internet, a report on the animals killed 
  under the Wildlife Services program of the Animal and Plant Health 
                          Inspection Service.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 5, 2015

Mrs. Davis of California (for herself, Mr. Blumenauer, and Mr. DeFazio) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                              Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of Agriculture, acting through the Animal and 
   Plant Health Inspection Service, to submit to Congress, and make 
available to the public on the Internet, a report on the animals killed 
  under the Wildlife Services program of the Animal and Plant Health 
                          Inspection Service.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Transparency for Lethal Control 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REPORT ON ANIMALS KILLED UNDER WILDLIFE SERVICES PROGRAM OF THE 
              ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH INSPECTION SERVICE.

    Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
and annually thereafter, the Secretary of Agriculture, acting through 
the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, shall submit to 
Congress, and make available to the public on the Internet, a report on 
the animals killed under the wildlife services program under section 1 
of the Act of March 2, 1931 (7 U.S.C. 426; 46 Stat. 1468), or by a 
State or local entity acting in cooperation with or on behalf of the 
wildlife services program during the preceding calendar year, 
including--
            (1) the number of such animals killed, listed by State, 
        county (or other similar political subdivision of a State), and 
        municipality;
            (2) the species name for such animals;
            (3) the method used to kill such animals; and
            (4) the reasons that the Secretary determined that--
                    (A) the species of such animals were injurious; and
                    (B) killing such animals was necessary.
                                 <all>
```
Listen

# The Federal Response to Anti-Asian Racism in the United States

The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights will hold a briefing on March 24, 2023, on the federal government’s response to anti-Asian racism in the United States. The Commission’s investigation seeks to examine the federal government’s role in documenting, prosecuting, and preventing hate crimes against persons of Asian descent during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The investigation will also include background and historical perspectives of Asian immigration in the U.S.; anti-Asian immigration laws and changes to immigration laws for persons of Asian descent; and misperceptions and stereotypes of Asian immigrants and Asian Americans.

At this public briefing, Commissioners will hear from subject matter experts such as government officials, academics, policy experts, law enforcement professionals advocates, and impacted persons. The Commission will accept written materials from the public for consideration as we prepare our report; submit to antiasianhatecrimes@usccr.gov no later than April 24, 2023.

Friday, March 24, 2023 - 1:00 PM

Transcript

Agenda

Media Advisory

Save the Date Notice

Meeting Notice

Agenda (Vietnamese)

Media Advisory (Vietnamese)

Save the Date (Vietnamese)

Meeting Notice (Vietnamese)

Agenda (Chinese Simplified)

Media Advisory (Chinese Simplified)

Save the Date (Chinese Simplified)

Meeting Notice (Chinese Simplified)

Agenda (Chinese Traditional)

Media Advisory (Chinese Traditional)

Save the Date (Chinese Traditional)

Meeting Notice (Chinese Traditional)

Panelist Materials

The Federal Response to Anti-Asian Racism in the United States

March 24, 2023

March 24, 2023

March 24, 2023

-  Event Calendar 
-  Public Briefings 
-  Commission Business Meetings 
-  Advisory Committees Meetings 
-  Archives
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Jeffrey H. Buchalter, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ILEX Oncology, Inc;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: November 9, 2004/s/Jeffrey H. BuchalterJeffrey H. Buchalter
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-15-00030-CV

Selvino Padilla, Jr. and Jeffrey M. Stern

v.

Alex Azoca

On Appeal from the

430th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. C-2332-13-J

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

April 30, 2015
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2259 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2259

To amend chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to provide that a 
member of the armed forces and the spouse of that member shall have the 
 same rights regarding the receipt of firearms at the location of any 
                      duty station of the member.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 2015

 Mr. Rigell (for himself, Mr. McKinley, Mr. Wilson of South Carolina, 
  Mr. Carter of Texas, and Mr. Babin) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to provide that a 
member of the armed forces and the spouse of that member shall have the 
 same rights regarding the receipt of firearms at the location of any 
                      duty station of the member.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protect Our Military Families' 2nd 
Amendment Rights Act''.

SEC. 2. RECEIPT OF FIREARM OR AMMUNITION BY SPOUSE OF MEMBER OF THE 
              ARMED FORCES AT A DUTY STATION OF THE MEMBER OUTSIDE THE 
              UNITED STATES.

    Section 925(a)(3) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``or to the spouse of such a member'' 
        before ``or to'';
            (2) by striking ``members,'' and inserting ``members and 
        spouses,'';
            (3) by striking ``members or'' and inserting ``members, 
        spouses, or''; and
            (4) by striking ``member or'' and inserting ``member, 
        spouse, or''.

SEC. 3. RESIDENCY OF SPOUSES OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES TO BE 
              DETERMINED ON THE SAME BASIS AS THE RESIDENCY OF SUCH 
              MEMBERS FOR PURPOSES OF FEDERAL FIREARMS LAWS.

    Section 921(b) of title 18, United States Code, is amended to read 
as follows:
    ``(b) For purposes of this chapter, a member of the Armed Forces on 
active duty, or a spouse of such a member, is a resident of--
            ``(1) the State in which the member or spouse maintains 
        legal residence;
            ``(2) the State in which the permanent duty station of the 
        member is located; and
            ``(3) the State in which the member maintains a place of 
        abode from which the member commutes each day to the permanent 
        duty station of the member.''.

SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by this Act shall apply to conduct engaged in 
after the 6-month period that begins with the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

Complainant

vs.

LARRY HENRY HOHL

Respondent.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket Number: 2023-0440

MISLE Activity ID: 7824146

WITHDRAWAL FROM DOCKET

The Coast Guard initiated an administrative proceeding by filing a Complaint on December 12, 

2023, seeking a Revocation of Respondent’s Merchant Mariner Credential.

On Jan 11, 2024, the Coast Guard filed a Notice of Withdrawal from docket as:

Respondent signed a Voluntary Surrender Agreement in accordance with 46 CFR § 5.203.

This matter is removed from the docket and closed without prejudice effective this date. The 

Coast Guard reserves the right to file a new Complaint in this matter.

Done and Dated January 14, 2024 at, 

Baltimore, MD

____________________________

Lauren M Meus

Hearing Docket Clerk

U.S. Coast Guard

By Direction of the Chief Administrative Law Judge
EXHIBIT 32.1











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of TransAct Technologies Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bart C. Shuldman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:  March 18, 2011








/s/ Bart C. ShuldmanBart C. Shuldman

Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit
23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form
S-8 (Nos. 333-32703, 333-32705, 333-49530, 333-49532, 333-49540, 333-49570, and
333-62269) of TransAct Technologies Incorporated of our report dated March 16,
2009 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in
this Form 10-K.





/s/
      PricewaterhouseCoopers
      LLPHartford,
      Connecticut
                  March
      16,
      2009
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 181 (Wednesday, September 22, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 52664]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-20485]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PL21-3-000]


Technical Conference on Greenhouse Gas Mitigation: Natural Gas 
Act Sections 3 and 7 Authorizations; Notice of Technical Conference

    Take notice that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 
(Commission) will convene a Commission staff-led technical conference 
to discuss methods natural gas companies may use to mitigate the 
effects of direct and indirect greenhouse gas emissions resulting from 
Natural Gas Act sections 3 and 7 authorizations. The technical 
conference will be held on Friday, November 19, 2021, from 
approximately 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Eastern time. The conference will 
be held virtually.
    The conference will be open for the public to attend virtually, and 
there is no fee for attendance. Supplemental notices will be issued 
prior to the conference with further details regarding the agenda and 
how to participate as a panelist. Information on this technical 
conference will also be posted on the Calendar of Events on the 
Commission's website, www.ferc.gov, prior to the event. Transcripts 
will be available for a fee from Ace Reporting, (202) 347-3700.
    Commission conferences are accessible under section 508 of the 
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations, please 
send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#177674747264647e757e7b7e636e577172657439707861"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d8b9bbbbbdababb1bab1b4b1aca198bebdaabbf6bfb7ae">[email protected]</span></a>, call toll-free (866) 208-3372 
(voice) or (202) 208-8659 (TTY), or send a fax to (202) 208-2106 with 
the required accommodations.
    For more information about this technical conference, please 
contact <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#02454a455667616a416d6c6442646770612c656d74"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7037383724151318331f1e1630161502135e171f06">[email protected]</span></a>. For information related to logistics, 
please contact Sarah McKinley at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6e1d0f1c0f0640030d050700020b172e080b1c0d40090118"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="06756774676e286b656d6f686a637f466063746528616970">[email protected]</span></a> or (202) 502-
8368. This notice is issued and published in accordance with 18 CFR 
2.1.

    Dated: September 16, 2021.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-20485 Filed 9-21-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### In the Matter of Craig Gerard Mokiber, an Attorney, Resignor.

[946 NYS2d 524]

Voluntary resignation accepted and name removed from roll of attorneys. Present — Smith, J.P., Fahey, Carni and Sconiers, JJ. (Filed June 12, 2012.)
EXHIBIT 3.4

                         TRIGON HEALTHCARE, INC.

                      AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED
                        BYLAWS OF TRIGON HEALTHCARE, INC.


     RESOLVED, that the Bylaws of Trigon Healthcare, Inc. are amended by
     substituting the following for Paragraph 1.10 Proxies:

      1.10  Proxies.  A  stockholder  may vote his or her shares in person or by
      proxy. A stockholder  may appoint a proxy to vote or otherwise act for him
      or her by (i)  executing a writing  authorizing a person or persons to act
      for  him  or  her  as  proxy  or  (ii)  transmitting  or  authorizing  the
      transmission  of a  telegram,  cablegram  or  other  means  of  electronic
      transmission  to the  person  who  will be the  holder  of the  proxy.  An
      appointment  of a proxy is  effective  when  received by the  Secretary or
      other  officer  or agent  authorized  to  tabulate  votes and is valid for
      eleven (11) months  unless a longer  period is  expressly  provided in the
      appointment   form.  An  appointment  of  a  proxy  is  revocable  by  the
      stockholder  unless the appointment form  conspicuously  states that it is
      irrevocable and the appointment is coupled with an interest.

      The death or  incapacity  of the  stockholder  appointing a proxy does not
      affect the right of the Corporation to accept the proxy's authority unless
      notice of the death or  incapacity  is received by the  Secretary or other
      officer or agent  authorized to tabulate  votes before the proxy exercises
      his or her authority under the appointment.  An irrevocable appointment is
      revoked  when the  interest  with which it is coupled is  extinguished.  A
      transferee for value of shares subject to an irrevocable  appointment  may
      revoke the  appointment if he or she did not know of its existence when he
      or  she  acquired  the  shares  and  the  existence  of  the   irrevocable
      appointment was not noted  conspicuously  on the certificate  representing
      the  shares.  Subject  to  any  legal  limitations  on  the  right  of the
      Corporation  to  accept  the vote or other  action  of a proxy  and to any
      express  limitation on the proxy's  authority (i) appearing on the face of
      the  written   authorization   or  (ii)   evident   from  the   electronic
      transmission,  the  Corporation  is entitled to accept the proxy's vote or
      other  action  as that of the  stockholder  making  the  appointment.  Any
      fiduciary  who is  entitled  to vote any  shares  may vote such  shares by
      proxy.