alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Tim Paterson-Brown, Chief Executive Officer of MGTCapital Investments, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to thebest of my knowledge:

 

(1)                             the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly periodended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2)                             the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|              | By:    | /s/ TIM PATERSON-BROWN  |
|-------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|              |   | Tim Paterson-Brown      |
|              |   | Chief Executive Officer |
| May 14, 2010 |   |                    |

 

----
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FRANCISCO J. GONZALEZ,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

JOSEPH M. ARPAIO, Former Maricopa

County Sheriff; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 18

- 16801

D.C. No. 2:17

- cv

- 04173

- ROS

- ESW

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Roslyn O. Silver, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 15, 2019 **

Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

Former pretrial detainee Francisco J. Gonzalez appeals pro se from the

district court’s August 8, 2018 and September 5, 2018 order s denying

reconsideration of the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action

alleging constitutional violations arising out of h is detention

. We have jurisdiction

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

OCT 22 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 18

- 16801

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion

. Sch. Dist. No. 1J,

Multnomah Cty., Or. v. ACandS, Inc. , 5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th Cir. 1993). We

affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Gonzalez’s motion s

for reconsideration because Gonzalez failed to establish any basis for such relief.

See id. at 1262

- 63 (setting forth grounds for reconsideration under Fed. R. Civ. P.

59(e) and 60(b)); see also Maxwell v. C ounty of San Diego , 708 F.3d 1075, 1097

(9th Cir. 2013) (“[T]here is no respondeat superior liability under § 1983.”).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
#### ROUSS, Respondent, v. McDONELL, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

September 29, 1896.)

Action by Charles B. Bouss against Bussell J. Mc-Donell.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JOSHUA P. COLA,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-2498

[June 3, 2021]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Caroline C. Shepherd, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2004-CF-000517-AXXX-MB.

Joshua P. Cola, Indiantown, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Luke R. Napodano, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, DAMOORGIAN and GERBER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 221 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 221

       To prevent a taxpayer bailout of health insurance issuers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 8, 2015

  Mr. Harris (for himself, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Roe of Tennessee, Mr. 
Kelly of Pennsylvania, Mr. Stewart, Mr. Salmon, Mr. Massie, Mr. Gosar, 
     Mr. Rothfus, Mr. LaMalfa, Mr. Loudermilk, Mr. Ribble, and Mr. 
  Huelskamp) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To prevent a taxpayer bailout of health insurance issuers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Obamacare Taxpayer Bailout 
Prevention Act''.

SEC. 2. PREVENTION OF BAILOUT OF HEALTH INSURANCE ISSUERS.

    The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is amended by 
striking section 1342 (42 U.S.C. 18062).
                                 <all>
```
datetime,inflow volume2011-09-17,1067.10744
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-21-00282-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 348th District Court

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 348-312651-19

Before Bassel, Womack, and Wallach, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

LESLIE BARWICK, Appellant

V.

YAHAIRA ALBERTO ORTEGA, Appellee
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On September 9, 2021, and September 22, 2021, we notified Appellant Leslie 

Barwick, in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(c), that we 

would dismiss this appeal unless Appellant paid the $205 filing fee. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 42.3(c), 44.3. Appellant has not done so. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

Because Appellant has not complied with a procedural requirement and the 

Texas Supreme Court’s order of August 28, 2015,1 we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered: October 7, 2021

1

See Supreme Court of Tex., Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases 

in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, 

Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Aug. 28, 2015) (listing courts of appeals’ fees).
Attorney-Client(Non-Gov)

 

Superintendent

United States Coast Guard

Coast Guard Academy

 

USCG Band, USCG Academy

15 Mohegan Ave

New London, CT 06320

Staff Symbol: pb 

Email: Laura.K.Pirruccello@uscg.mil

Dear Music Educator: April 17th, 2024

The U.S. Coast Guard Band invites you and your students to attend its 36th annual School Concert Series in Leamy Hall 

Auditorium on the grounds of the historic U.S. Coast Guard Academy in New London, CT. These age-specific 

performances allow students to experience an educational and entertaining hour-long performance by a world-class 50-

piece Concert Band. Coast Guard Band Assistant Director CWO Jeffrey Spenner leads the Band in exploring music and 

how it connects, informs, interacts with, and enhances other areas of curriculum and life. Past years have focused on 

geography, science, and visual art. The program will showcase the various sections of the band and highlight the 

collaborative way musicians come together to make beautiful music. Students will enjoy learning and listening to great 

music performed by world-class musicians in this interactive presentation.

Performances for Elementary students (Grades K-5)

Tuesday, OCTOBER 22th, 2024 at 10:00 a.m. 

Wednesday, OCTOBER 23rd, 2024 at 10:00 a.m. 

Friday, OCTOBER 25th, 2024 at 10:00 a.m. (LIVESTREAM available through band website)

Performances for Middle School students (Grades 6-8)

Monday, OCTOBER 28th, 2024 at 10:00 a.m.

Tuesday, OCTOBER 29th, 2024 at 10:00 a.m. 

Wednesday, OCTOBER 30th, 2024 at 10:00 a.m. (LIVESTREAM available through band website)

Confirmation for bookings will only be made on the specific date(s) designated for your grade level(s). Over 200,000 

students have attended our school concerts over the past 35 years, and all indications are that this year’s concerts will be 

as popular as ever. 

To organize these concerts effectively, we need to know the number of students and chaperones planning to attend, 

the number of buses scheduled to transport them, the date desired, and your name, school address, phone number, 

email address and personal cell phone in the case of emergency on the day of the concert. If you wish for your 

students to be among those in attendance, please use the following link to request a concert: 2024 School Concert Form.

This form is also available on our website, https://www.uscg.mil/Community/Coast-Guard-Band/School-Concerts/. 

Schools will be accepted on a “First come, first served basis”. If you have questions, please email: 

Laura.K.Pirruccello@uscg.mil A teacher information packet will be emailed in the fall to attending schools. We look 

forward to welcoming you and your students to Leamy Hall Auditorium next fall. 

Sincerely,

Laura Pirruccello

Chief Musician, U.S. Coast Guard Band
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

DAVID M. VECCHIO, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-522 ) BARBARA A. VECCHIO, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed May 17, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Keith Meyer, Judge. Michael J. Park of Park, Ossian, Barnaky & Park, P.A., Clearwater, for Appellant. Brandon S. Vesely of The Florida Appellate Firm, P.A., St. Petersburg, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

VILLANTI, KHOUZAM, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH 3RD QUARTER 10Q-SB.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          67,082
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,314
<ALLOWANCES>                                    25,611
<INVENTORY>                                     26,259
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               110,044
<PP&E>                                         850,787
<DEPRECIATION>                                  39,939
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 920,892
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          559,175
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,864,940
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,503,223)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   920,892
<SALES>                                        111,895
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               111,895
<CGS>                                           58,230
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   58,230
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               660,220
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (606,555)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 21.1



                             LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

                                                          ORGANIZED OR
   NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                                     INCORPORATION

   Consolidated Cigar Corporation                         Delaware
   Congar International Corporation                       Delaware
   Cuban Cigar Brands, NV                                 Netherlands-Antilles
   Direct Products Inc.                                   Delaware
   Fabrica de Tabacos La Flor de Copan, S.A. de C.V.      Honduras
   Jamaica Tobacco Manufacturing Company (1995) Ltd.      Jamaica
   Tabacalera de Garcia, Ltd.                             Bermuda
   Tabacos San Andres S.A. de C.V.                        Honduras
   Triple C Marketing Inc.                                Delaware
EXHIBIT 4
                                                                     ---------


                                 CERTIFICATION

         CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY RULE 13A-14(B) AND SECTION 1350 OF
               CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

In  connection  with the report of Canadian  Natural  Resources  Limited  (the
"Company")  on the Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending  December  31, 2005 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I, Steve W. Laut,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge:

1.    The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section  13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operations  of the
      Company.


DATED this 29th day of March, 2006.


/s/ Steve W. Laut
------------------------
Steve W. Laut
President and Chief Operating Officer (Principal Executive Officer),
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-4559

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus URBANA MENDEZ-VALDEZ, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-97-289) Submitted: April 27, 1999 Decided: May 18, 1999 Before HAMILTON and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Daniel Smith Johnson, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellant. Walter C. Holton, Jr., United States Attorney, Michael F. Joseph, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Urbana Mendez-Valdez appeals from a forty-two-month sentence imposed following her convictions for distribution of cocaine hydrochloride, 21 U.S.C.A. § 841(a) (West 1981), and conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and to distribute cocaine hydrochloride, 21 U.S.C.A. § 846 (West Supp. 1998). Mendez-Valdez challenges the district court’s relevant conduct determination of the amount of drugs attributable to her. Finding that the district court did not clearly err, we affirm Mendez-Valdez’s convictions and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

Complainant

vs.

BYRON CRENSHAW PRUITT

Respondent

Docket Number 2023-0367

Enforcement Activity No. 7796078

CONSENT ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

On October 24, 2023, the parties in this case submitted a Motion for Approval of a 

Settlement Agreement and Entry of Consent Order to be approved as a settlement of the case 

under 33 C.F.R. § 20.502. After carefully reviewing the terms of the Settlement Agreement, I

find that it is fair, reasonable, and in substantial compliance with the requirements of 33 C.F.R. 

§ 20.502.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the record, it is hereby ORDERED the Settlement Agreement is 

APPROVED in full and incorporated herein by reference. This Consent Order shall constitute 

full, final, and complete adjudication of this proceeding.

Done and dated this 21st day of December 2023, 

at Houston, Texas

______________________________

HON. TOMMY CANTRELL

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE 

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD
EXHIBIT 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Southwest Holdings, Inc. and
Subsidiaries  (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission (the Report), I, Alan
Doyle,  President (Chief Executive Officer) and Treasurer  (Principal  Financial
Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the report fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the  information  contained  in the Report  fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of the Company.

Date:  January 5, 2004



/s/  Alan Doyle
---------------------------------------
Alan Doyle
President (Chief Executive Officer) and
Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

LTNITED STATES COAST GUARD

Complainant

vs.

KYLE BAILEY BELLARD

Respondent

Docket Number 2023-0065

Enforcement Activity No.7637472

CONSENT ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

On April 20,2023, the parties in this case submitted a Motion for Approval of a

Settlement Agreement and Entry ofConsent Order to be approved as a settlement ofthe case

under 33 C.F.R. $ 20.502.

I have carefully reviewed the terms of the Settlement Agreement and find that it is fair

and reasonable and in substantial compliance with the requirements of33 C.F.R. S 20.502.

ORDER

Upon consideration of record, it is hereby ORDERED that the Settlement Agreement is

APPROVED in full and incorporated herein by reference. This Consent Order shall constitute

full, final, and complete adjudication ofthis proceeding.

Done and Dated May 4, 2023 at

New Orleans, LA

HON. BRIAN J. CURLEY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARI)

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
Certificate of Service

I hereby certifi that I have this day served the foregoing document(s) upon the following parties

and limited participants (or designated representatives) in this proceeding via electronic mail.

LT Chrisina L. Jeanes

Chrisina. L.Jeanes(rDuscq.mil

Kyle B. Bellard

By Email

ALJ Docketing Center

U.S. Coast Guard

aljdocketcenter@uscg. mr I

Done and dated this 4th day of May,2023 at

New Orleans, Louisiana

lsl

Nicole E. Mulmore

Paralegal Specialist
Authority for Assessment of a Civil Penalty for Simple 

Possession of a Controlled Substance 

The only valid authority for assessment of a civil penalty for simple possession of 

a controlled substance by a CG Hearing Officer, is 46 USC § 70506, which is part 

of the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (MDLEA).* 

Authority to enforce this section has been delegated by the DHS Secretary to the 

Coast Guard. Chapter 7 of the Maritime Law Enforcement Manual (MLEM), 

COMDTINST M16247.1 (series) provides policy guidance for all drug law 

enforcement matters pertaining to the Coast Guard.

* Subsection (c) of 46 USC § 70506 states, “...Any individual on a vessel subject 

to the jurisdiction of the United States who is found by the Secretary, after notice 

and an opportunity for a hearing, to have knowingly or intentionally possessed a 

controlled substance...shall be liable to the United States for a civil penalty of not 

to exceed $5,000 for each violation...” This was an amendment to the MDLEA 

made by section 302 of The Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2010 (Public Law 

111-281). Authority to enforce the civil penalty was delegated to the Coast Guard 

in April, 2015.
# C_2021082EN.01000701.xml

| 11.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/7

---

Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)

(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1)
  )

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 82/07)

Decisions granting an authorisation

| Reference of the decision (2) | Date of decision | Substance name | Holder of the authorisation | Authorisation number | Authorised use | Date of expiry of review period | Reasons for the decision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| C(2021) 1385 | 4 March 2021 | trichloroethylene (TCE)
  EC No 201-167-4; CAS No 79-01-6 | SPOLANA s.r.o., ul. Práce 657, 277 11 Neratovice, Czechia | REACH/21/2/0/R1 | Extraction solvent in caprolactam production | 21 April 2032 | In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies. |

Reference of the decision (2)

Date of decision

Substance name

Holder of the authorisation

Authorisation number

Authorised use

Date of expiry of review period

Reasons for the decision

C(2021) 1385

4 March 2021

trichloroethylene (TCE)

EC No 201-167-4; CAS No 79-01-6

SPOLANA s.r.o., ul. Práce 657, 277 11 Neratovice, Czechia

REACH/21/2/0/R1

Extraction solvent in caprolactam production

21 April 2032

In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies.

---

(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: http://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/chemicals/reach/about/index_en.htm

---