Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 183 / Friday, September 24, 2021 / Notices 53111 

collection. Agencies administering low 

income and affordable housing 

programs subject to maintenance 

prevailing wage rates use HUD Form 

4750 to recommend maintenance wage 

rates to HUD and use HUD Forms 4751 

and 4752 to collect data from local 

entities that employ personnel 

performing the same duties as the 

agency’s maintenance staff. HUD uses 

the data collected from HUD Forms 

4750, 4751, and 4752 to determine or 

adopt prevailing wage rates for 

maintenance laborers and mechanics 

employed in the operation of low 

income and affordable housing projects 

subject to Federal prevailing wage rates. 

HUD and local agencies that 

administer HUD-assisted projects will 

no longer be required to use the HUD 

Form 4230A for additional classification 

requests. Instead, HUD and local 

agencies will utilize the form SF–1444 

and submit employer additional 

classification and wage rate requests to 

DOL when DOL approval is required. 

The information collection of the SF– 

1444 is contained in the OMB Control 

No. 9000–0066. 

Information 

collection 

Number of 

respondents 

Frequency 

of response 

Responses 

per 

annum 

Burden hours 

per response 

Annual 

burden 

hours 

Hourly 

cost per 

response 

Total cost 

HUD—4750 Maintenance Wage Recommendation ............ 1,381.00 1.00 1,381.00 2.00 2,762.00 $42.01 $116,031.62 

HUD—4751 Maintenance Wage Rate 

Survey ...................... 1,133.00 1.00 1,133.00 2.00 2,266.00 42.01 95,194.66 

HUD—4752 Maintenance Wage Rate 

Survey—Summary 

Sheet ........................ 1,133.00 1.00 1,133.00 4.00 4,53200 42.01 190,389.32 

Total ...................... 3,647.00 ........................ 3,647.00 8.00 9,560.00 42.01 401,615.60 

B. Solicitation of Public Comment 

This notice is soliciting comments 

from members of the public and affected 

parties concerning the collection of 

information described in Section A on 

the following: 

(1) Whether the proposed collection 

of information is necessary for the 

proper performance of the functions of 

the agency, including whether the 

information will have practical utility; 

(2) The accuracy of the agency’s 

estimate of the burden of the proposed 

collection of information; 

(3) Ways to enhance the quality, 

utility, and clarity of the information to 

be collected; and 

(4) Ways to minimize the burden of 

the collection of information on those 

who are to respond; including through 

the use of appropriate automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology, e.g., permitting 

electronic submission of responses. 

HUD encourages interested parties to 

submit comment in response to these 

questions. 

C. Authority 

Section 3507 of the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 

Chapter 35 

Krista Mills, 

Director, Office of Field Policy and 

Management. 

[FR Doc. 2021–20791 Filed 9–23–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4210–67–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Fish and Wildlife Service 

[Docket No. FWS–R1–ES–2020–0101; 

FXES11140100000–212–FF01E0000] 

Draft Environmental Impact Statement 

and Habitat Conservation Plan for 

Thurston County, Washington 

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of availability; notice of 

public meetings; request for comments. 

SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and 

Wildlife Service (Service), announce the 

availability of a habitat conservation 

plan developed by Thurston County, 

Washington (applicant), in support of an 

application for an incidental take permit 

under the Endangered Species Act. The 

applicant is seeking authorization for 

the incidental take of six species, 

expected to result from various Countypermitted development activities, as 

well as construction and maintenance of 

County-owned or County-managed 

infrastructure, over the next 30 years. 

The incidental take and other impacts 

would occur in Thurston County. This 

notice also announces the availability of 

the Service’s draft environmental 

impact statement and the opening of the 

public comment period, which is 

intended to satisfy the National 

Environmental Policy Act requirement 

to evaluate the impacts of the proposed 

action on the human environment. We 

are seeking public comments on the 

habitat conservation plan and draft 

environmental impact statement. 

DATES:

Submitting Comments: We will accept 

comments received or postmarked on or 

before November 8, 2021. Comments 

submitted online at https://

www.regulations.gov/ (see ADDRESSES) 

must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern 

Time on November 8, 2021. 

Public Meetings: The Service will 

hold two public meetings during the 

public comment and review period. To 

help protect the public and limit the 

spread of the COVID–19 virus, the 

public meetings will be held virtually at 

the following times: 

• October 12, 2021 at 6 p.m. 

• October 14, 2021, at 6 p.m. 

ADDRESSES:

Submitting Comments: You may 

submit comments by one of the 

following methods: 

• Internet: http://

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments 

on Docket No. FWS–R1–ES–2020–0101. 

• U.S. mail: Public Comments 

Processing; Attn: Docket No. FWS–R1– 

ES–2020–0101; U.S. Fish and Wildlife 

Service Headquarters, MS: PRB/3W; 

5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 

22041–3803. 

We will post all comments on http:// 

www.regulations.gov. This generally 

means that we will post online any 

personal information that you provide 

(see Public Availability of Comments 

under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). We 

53112 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 183 / Friday, September 24, 2021 / Notices 

request that you submit comments by 

only the methods described above. For 

additional information about submitting 

comments, see Request for Public 

Comments under SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION. 

Public Meetings: A link and access 

instructions to the virtual meetings will 

be posted to https://www.fws.gov/ 

wafwo/ at least one week prior to the 

first public meeting date. 

Reviewing U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) comments on 

the draft HCP and DEIS: See EPA’s Role 

in the EIS Process under SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Curtis Tanner, by telephone at 360–753– 

9440, or by email at Curtis_Tanner@

fws.gov. Hearing or speech impaired 

individuals may call the Federal Relay 

Service at 800–877–8339 for TTY 

service. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The U.S. 

Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has 

prepared a draft Environmental Impact 

Statement (DEIS) to evaluate an 

application for an incidental take permit 

(ITP) received on July 30, 2020, from 

Thurston County, Washington 

(applicant). In accordance with the 

requirements of the Endangered Species 

Act, as amended (ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531 

et seq.), the applicant is requesting 

authorization of incidental take of the 

threatened Yelm pocket gopher 

(Thomomys mazama yelmensis), 

Olympia pocket gopher (T. mazama 

pugetensis), Tenino pocket gopher (T. 

mazama tumuli), and Oregon spotted 

frog (Rana pretiosa); the endangered 

Taylor’s checkerspot butterfly 

(Euphydryas editha taylori); and the 

Oregon vesper sparrow (Pooecetes 

gramineus affinis), which is under 

review to determine if Federal listing 

under the ESA is warranted (hereafter, 

covered species). If issued, the ITP 

would authorize take of the covered 

species that may occur incidental to 

various County-permitted development 

activities, as well as construction and 

maintenance of County-owned or 

County-managed infrastructure, for a 

period of 30 years. In support of the ITP 

application, the applicant prepared the 

draft Thurston County habitat 

conservation plan (HCP), which 

specifies the impacts that will likely 

result from the take of covered species 

and describes the steps the applicant 

will take to avoid, minimize, and 

mitigate such impacts. 

The Service prepared a DEIS to 

evaluate the impacts of the proposed 

ITP action on the human environment, 

consistent with the purpose and goals of 

the National Environmental Policy Act 

(NEPA; 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and 

pursuant to the Council on 

Environmental Quality’s implementing 

NEPA regulations at 40 CFR parts 1500– 

1508. Additionally, this DEIS was 

prepared consistent with the 

Department of the Interior NEPA 

regulations (43 CFR part 46); 

longstanding federal judicial and 

regulatory interpretations; and 

Adminstration priorities and policies 

including Secretary’s Order No. 3399 

requiring bureaus and offices to use ‘‘the 

same application or level of NEPA that 

would have been applied to a proposed 

action before the 2020 Rule went into 

effect.’’ 

The DEIS will also be used by 

Thurston County to satisfy the 

requirements of the Washington State 

Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) as 

provided in Revised Code of 

Washington 43.21C and SEPA 

implementing regulations found at 

Washington Administrative Code 197– 

11. We are making the HCP and DEIS 

available for public review and 

comment. 

Background 

Thurston County is seeking an ITP, 

and intends to implement the Thurston 

HCP, to cover a variety of activities for 

which the County issues permits or 

approvals, or activities the County 

otherwise carries out under its 

jurisdiction as detailed in the HCP. 

These activities include residential 

development, development of accessory 

structures, installation, repair, or 

alteration of septic systems, commercial 

and industrial development, public 

service facility construction, 

transportation projects, transportation 

maintenance and other work within 

County-owned road rights-of-way, 

landfill and solid waste management, 

water resources management, and 

County parks, trails, and land 

management. The covered activities 

would not include mining. The 

proposed covered activities are 

described further in the DEIS and in the 

HCP. 

The species proposed for coverage 

under the Thurston HCP and ITP 

include three subspecies of the Mazama 

pocket gopher (the Yelm pocket gopher, 

Olympia pocket gopher, and the Tenino 

pocket gopher), Oregon spotted frog, 

Taylor’s checkerspot butterfly, and the 

Oregon vesper sparrow. Each of the 

proposed covered species is known to 

occur in Thurston County. Habitat loss 

and fragmentation are primary threats to 

all proposed covered species. Habitat 

likely to be impacted is already largely 

fragmented or degraded, and not 

currently managed for the covered 

species. 

The HCP includes measures to avoid, 

minimize, and mitigate impacts to 

covered species, along with an analysis 

of projected impacts to covered species. 

As it is not practical to express the 

anticipated take (or to monitor takerelated impacts) in terms of number of 

individuals of each species, the HCP 

uses habitat, measured as habitat area or 

as ‘‘functional-acre’’ values, as a 

surrogate for quantifying impacts to 

each covered species and related 

conservation outcomes. The functionalacre approach weights habitat acreage 

by currently available information on 

covered species’ distribution, habitat 

condition, and landscape position in 

relationship to priority habitat areas. 

This approach provides greater weight 

to both impacts and mitigation 

occurring in or near areas that are a 

priority for conservation of the covered 

species. 

Through the HCP, the county would 

permit or conduct covered activities that 

cause take of covered species, monitor 

the amount and extent of take, and 

ensure mitigation on permanently 

protected sites to fully offset impacts of 

the taking on covered species. The HCP 

conservation program includes 

performance standards for conservation 

lands and minimization measures 

tailored to the best available information 

for each species. 

Impacts to Mazama pocket gopher 

subspecies would result from HCPcovered development and maintenance 

activities within habitat in their 

respective ranges. Due to more limited 

exposure to covered activities, impacts 

to the Oregon spotted frog, Taylor’s 

checkerspot butterfly, and Oregon 

vesper sparrow would be caused by a 

smaller number of HCP-covered 

development and maintenance activities 

taking place in respective habitats for 

each species, which have relatively 

localized ranges in Thurston County. 

Measures to minimize impacts of the 

taking on covered species are primarily 

tied to reducing the extent of habitat 

impacts through within-site project 

design, along with additional speciesspecific measures for each group of 

covered activities, described in the HCP. 

To mitigate unavoidable impacts to 

covered species, Thurston County 

proposes to permanently protect and 

manage habitat occupied by covered 

species by establishing new permanent 

habitat reserves, acquiring permanent 

conservation easements on working 

lands, and enhancing and permanently 

maintaining habitat quality on existing 

reserves (collectively ‘‘conservation 

lands’’). The addition of conservation 

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 183 / Friday, September 24, 2021 / Notices 53113 

lands would occur incrementally during 

HCP implementation at a pace that 

meets or exceeds the amount and extent 

of impacts to each covered species. 

The Thurston HCP includes funding 

assurances, monitoring, adaptive 

management, and changed circumstance 

provisions to help ensure that biological 

goals for the covered species are 

achieved. Annual reports would 

confirm the amount, type, and location 

of impacts and mitigation, as well as the 

status of monitoring, adaptive 

management, changed circumstances, 

and funding. The proposed conservation 

program and expected effects of HCP 

implementation on the covered species 

and their designated critical habitats are 

described in greater detail in the 

Thurston HCP and in the DEIS. 

Endangered Species Act 

Section 9 of the ESA prohibits ‘‘take’’ 

of fish and wildlife species listed as 

endangered under section 4 (16 U.S.C. 

1538 and 16 U.S.C. 1533, respectively). 

The ESA implementing regulations 

extend, under certain circumstances, the 

prohibition of take to threatened species 

(50 CFR 17.31). Under section 3 of the 

ESA, the term ‘‘take’’ means to ‘‘harass, 

harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, 

trap, capture, or collect, or attempt to 

engage in any such conduct’’ (16 U.S.C. 

1532(19)). The term ‘‘harm’’ is defined 

by regulation as ‘‘an act which actually 

kills or injures wildlife.’’ Such act may 

include significant habitat modification 

or degradation where it actually kills or 

injures wildlife by significantly 

impairing essential behavioral patterns, 

including breeding, feeding, or 

sheltering’’ (50 CFR 17.3). 

Under section 10(a) of the ESA, the 

Service may issue permits to authorize 

incidental take of listed fish and 

wildlife species. ‘‘Incidental take’’ is 

defined by the ESA as take that is 

incidental to, and not the purpose of, 

carrying out an otherwise lawful 

activity. Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the ESA 

contains provisions for issuing ITPs to 

non-Federal entities for the take of 

endangered and threatened species, 

provided the following criteria are met: 

1. The taking will be incidental; 

2. The applicant will, to the 

maximum extent practicable, minimize 

and mitigate the impact of such taking; 

3. The applicant will ensure that 

adequate funding for the plan will be 

provided; 

4. The taking will not appreciably 

reduce the likelihood of the survival 

and recovery of the species in the wild; 

and 

5. The applicant will carry out any 

other measures that the Service may 

require as being necessary or 

appropriate for the purposes of the HCP. 

Anticipated Permits and Authorizations 

In addition to the requested ITP, 

Thurston County will manage covered 

activities to comply with all other 

applicable laws, including without 

limitation Washington State endangered 

and protected species regulations; the 

Washington State Growth Management 

Act, which includes State and local 

protection of historic and cultural 

resources implemented through the 

County’s Comprehensive Plan; the 

Washington State Shoreline 

Management Act; the Washington State 

Hydraulic Code; Thurston County 

Critical Area Ordinances; State and 

local requirements for administrative 

procedures; and other regulations. 

Individual projects conducted under the 

HCP will undergo individual review by 

the County for compliance with local 

codes and further public review, as 

appropriate, through the Washington 

SEPA. 

National Environmental Policy Act 

In compliance with NEPA (42 U.S.C. 

4321 et seq.), the Service prepared a 

DEIS, in which we analyze the proposed 

action and a reasonable range of 

alternatives to the proposed action. The 

environmental consequences of each 

alternative, including the effects of 

those alternatives when combined with 

reasonably foreseeable future actions 

and environmental trends, were 

analyzed to determine if significant 

impacts to the human environment 

would occur. Three alternatives are 

analyzed in detail in the DEIS. 

Alternative 1—No-Action Alternative: 

The Service would not issue incidental 

take authorization to the County, and 

the County would not implement the 

HCP. The County would continue to 

conduct, permit, and approve activities 

on a case-by-case basis in compliance 

with Federal, State, and local 

requirements, including the Thurston 

County Critical Areas code. The County 

and individual project proponents 

would continue to evaluate each project 

to ensure unauthorized take of listed 

species is avoided. The County would 

not implement a coordinated, Countywide conservation program for ESAlisted species. This alternative is the 

current situation in Thurston County. 

Alternative 2—Proposed Action: The 

Service would, in accordance with 

applicable law, issue the requested ITP 

to Thurston County for the incidental 

take of covered species by the covered 

activities. The County would implement 

the Thurston County HCP and its 

conservation program, including, 

without limitation, implementation of 

minimization measures for covered 

activities; mitigation measures to fully 

offset the impacts of the taking on 

covered species; monitoring and 

reporting requirements. The County 

would also provide funding for HCP 

implementation. Under Alternative 2, 

mitigation would be achieved, in part, 

through the execution of conservation 

easements on working agricultural 

lands, the enhancement of existing 

conservation reserves, and the 

establishment of new conservation 

reserves. 

Alternative 3—Modified HCP: The 

Service would, in accordance with 

applicable law, issue an ITP to Thurston 

County with the same permit area, 

permit term, covered species, covered 

activities, and many of the HCP 

elements described for the Proposed 

Action. This alternative explores 

whether the HCP could be modified to 

provide higher conservation value to 

covered species by acquiring new 

habitat reserves and managing them to 

achieve the highest habitat quality. 

Conservation easements would not be 

executed on working agricultural lands, 

and enhancement of existing 

conservation reserves would not be part 

of the mitigation strategy. Under this 

Alternative, fewer acres of new 

conserved habitat may be needed to 

fully offset the impacts of the taking to 

covered species. 

EPA’s Role in the EIS Process 

The EPA is charged with reviewing all 

Federal agencies’ EISs and commenting 

on the adequacy and acceptability of the 

environmental impacts of proposed 

actions. Therefore, EPA is publishing a 

notice in the Federal Register 

announcing this DEIS, as required under 

section 309 of the Clean Air Act. The 

publication date of EPA’s notice of 

availability is the official beginning of 

the public comment period. EPA serves 

as the repository (EIS database) for EISs 

prepared by Federal agencies. You may 

search for EPA comments on EISs, along 

with EISs themselves, at https://

cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-public/ 

action/eis/search. 

Public Comments 

You may submit your comments and 

materials by one of the methods in 

ADDRESSES. We specifically request 

information on the following: 

1. Biological information, analysis, 

and relevant data concerning the 

covered species, other wildlife, and 

ecosystems. 

2. Potential effects that the proposed 

permit action could have on the covered 

species, and other endangered or 

53114 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 183 / Friday, September 24, 2021 / Notices 

threatened species, and their habitats, 

including the interaction of the effects 

of the project with climate change and 

other stressors. 

3. Adequacy of the proposed actions 

to minimize and mitigate the impact of 

the taking on covered species, including 

but not limited to best management 

practices, conservation easements, 

establishment of new reserves, reserve 

habitat enhancement, and adaptive 

management procedures. 

4. Potential effects that the proposed 

permit action could have on other 

aspects of the human environment, 

including effects on plants and animals, 

water resources, and aesthetic, historic, 

cultural, economic, social, 

environmental justice, climate change, 

or health effects. 

5. The alternatives analysis conducted 

by the Service, including the 

alternatives analyzed, the range of 

alternatives analyzed, and the 

alternatives considered but not analyzed 

in detail. 

6. The presence of historic 

properties—including archaeological 

sites, buildings and structures, historic 

events, sacred and traditional areas, and 

other historic preservation concerns—in 

the proposed permit area, which are 

required to be considered in project 

planning by the National Historic 

Preservation Act. 

7. Reasonably foreseeable 

environmental trends and planned 

actions in the plan area and their 

possible impacts on the affected 

environment, including the covered 

species, as well as any connected 

actions that are closely related and 

should be discussed in the same DEIS. 

8. The alternatives, information, and 

analyses submitted during the public 

scoping period and the summary thereof 

(40 CFR 1502.17), appended to the 

DEIS. 

9. Other information relevant to the 

Thurston HCP and its impacts on the 

human environment. 

To help protect the public and limit 

the spread of the COVID–19 virus, two 

public meetings will be conducted 

online to accommodate best practices 

and local guidelines in place at the time 

this notice was prepared. See DATES and 

ADDRESSES for the dates and times of the 

virtual public meetings. The virtual 

public meetings will provide Thurston 

County and the Service an opportunity 

to present information pertinent to the 

Thurston HCP and for the public to ask 

questions on the HCP and DEIS. No 

opportunity for oral comments will be 

provided. Written comments may be 

submitted by the methods listed in 

ADDRESSES. 

Reasonable Accommodations 

Persons needing reasonable 

accommodations in order to attend and 

participate in either of the public 

meetings should contact the Service’s 

Washington Fish and Wildlife Office, 

using one of the methods listed in 

ADDRESSES as soon as possible. In order 

to allow sufficient time to process 

requests, please make contact no later 

than one week before the desired public 

meeting. Information regarding this 

proposed action is available in 

alternative formats upon request. 

Public Availability of Comments 

You may submit your comments and 

materials by one of the methods listed 

in ADDRESSES. Before including your 

address, phone number, or other 

personal identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment—including your 

personal identifying information—might 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you can ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. All submissions from 

organizations or businesses, and from 

individuals identifying themselves as 

representatives or officials of 

organizations or businesses, will be 

made available for public disclosure in 

their entirety. 

Comments and materials we receive, 

as well as references for supporting 

documentation we used in preparing the 

DEIS, will be available for public 

inspection online in Docket No. FWS– 

R1–ES–2020–0101 at http://

www.regulations.gov/ (see FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT). 

Next Steps and Decision To Be Made 

After public review and comment, we 

will evaluate the permit application, 

associated documents, and any 

comments received, to determine 

whether the permit application meets 

the requirements of section 10(a)(1)(B) 

of the ESA. We will also evaluate 

whether issuance of the requested ITP 

would comply with section 7 of the 

ESA. The Service expects to have a 

Final EIS for publication in the Federal 

Register by early 2022. At least 30 days 

after the FEIS is available, we expect the 

record of decision will be completed in 

accordance with applicable timeframes 

established in 40 CFR 1506.11, and the 

Regional Director will issue a decision 

on the requested ITP. The current 

estimate for the issuance of a record of 

decision is March 2022. This estimate 

assumes that there are no significant 

outstanding issues requiring resolution. 

Authority 

We provide this notice in accordance 

with the requirements of section 10(c) of 

the ESA (16 U.S.C. 1539(c)) and NEPA 

and its implementing regulations (40 

CFR 1503.1 and 1506.6). 

Hugh Morrison, 

Deputy Regional Director, U.S. Fish and 

Wildlife Service. 

[FR Doc. 2021–20493 Filed 9–23–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4333–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Land Management 

[BAC 4331–11] 

Notice of Public Meetings of the Idaho 

Resource Advisory Council 

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of public meeting. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

Federal Land Policy and Management 

Act of 1976 and the Federal Advisory 

Committee Act of 1972, the U.S. 

Department of the Interior, Bureau of 

Land Management’s (BLM) Idaho 

Resource Advisory Council (RAC) will 

meet as indicated below. 

DATES: The BLM Idaho RAC will meet 

on Wednesday, November 10, 2021. The 

meeting will be held from 9:00 a.m. to 

5:00 p.m. (Mountain Standard Time). 

The RAC will also meet on Wednesday, 

February 16, 2022. The meeting will be 

held from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. 

(Mountain Standard Time). Public 

comment periods will be offered during 

both meetings. 

ADDRESSES: The November 10, 2021, 

meeting will be held virtually. The 

February 11, 2022, meeting will be held 

at the BLM Twin Falls District Office, 

2878 Addison Avenue East, Twin Falls, 

Idaho 83301. If COVID restrictions 

remain in place, the February meeting 

will be held virtually. Virtual 

participation information will be posted 

online two weeks in advance of each 

meeting at https://www.blm.gov/getinvolved/resource-advisory-council/ 

near-you/idaho. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: MJ 

Byrne, 1387 South Vinnell Way, Boise, 

Idaho 83709; (208) 373–4006; mbyrne@

blm.gov. Persons who use a 

telecommunications device for the deaf 

(TDD) may call the Federal Relay 

Service (FRS) at 1–800–877–8339 to 

contact Ms. Byrne during normal 

business hours. The FRS is available 24 

hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a 

message or question with the above