alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

# AGENCY:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) located within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announces the names of the Performance Review Board Members who are reviewing performance of Senior Executive Service (SES) members, Title 42 (T42) executives, and Senior Level (SL) employees for Fiscal Year 2021.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Henry Greene, Team Chief, Executive and Scientific Resources Office, Human Resources Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, MS US11-2, Atlanta, Georgia 30329-4027. Telephone (770) 488-1140.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Title 5, U.S.C. 4314(c)(4) of the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, Public Law 95-454, requires that the appointment of Performance Review Board Members be published in the **Federal Register**. The following persons will serve on the CDC Performance Review Board, which will oversee the evaluation of performance appraisals of Senior Executive Service members for the Fiscal Year 2021 review period:

Bornstein, Joshua, Co-Chair

Dean, Hazel, Co-Chair

Bonander, Jason

Dulin, Stephanie

Ethier, Kathleen

Kitt, Margaret

Kosmos, Christine

Peeples, Amy

Perry, Terrance

Pirkle, James

Wharton, Melinda

Dated: September 10, 2021.

Sandra Cashman,

Executive Secretary, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2021-19907 Filed 9-14-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
# C_2021459EN.01002301.xml

| 12.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 459/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 459/23

---

EUROPEAN INNOVATION COUNCIL AND SMES EXECUTIVE AGENCY

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2020

(2021/C 459/23)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://eismea.ec.europa.eu/easme-documents_en

---
# C_2021414EN.01000101.xml

| 13.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 414/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 414/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10441 — Bridgepoint/FFL/ACT)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 414/01)

On 30 September 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10441. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10441. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2287 

To require the National Credit Union Administration to hold public hearings 

and receive comments from the public on its budget, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 13, 2015 

Mr. MULVANEY (for himself and Ms. SINEMA) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To require the National Credit Union Administration to hold 

public hearings and receive comments from the public 

on its budget, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Credit Union 

5 Administration Budget Transparency Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. BUDGET TRANSPARENCY FOR THE NCUA. 

7 Section 209(b) of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 

8 U.S.C. 1789) is amended— 

9 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (1) and (2) as 

10 paragraphs (2) and (3), respectively; 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2287 IH

1 (2) by inserting before paragraph (2), as so re2 designated, the following: 

3 ‘‘(1) on an annual basis and prior to the sub4 mission of the detailed business-type budget required 

5 under paragraph (2)— 

6 ‘‘(A) make publicly available and cause to 

7 be printed in the Federal Register a draft of 

8 such detailed business-type budget; and 

9 ‘‘(B) hold a public hearing, with public no10 tice provided of such hearing, wherein the pub11 lic can submit comments on the draft of such 

12 detailed business-type budget;’’; and 

13 (3) in paragraph (2), as so redesignated— 

14 (A) by inserting ‘‘detailed’’ after ‘‘submit 

15 a’’; and 

16 (B) by inserting ‘‘, and where such budget 

17 shall address any comments submitted by the 

18 public pursuant to paragraph (1)(B)’’ after 

19 ‘‘Control Act’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                          11,378
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,040
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        425
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,943
<PP&E>                                          58,387
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,878
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  61,452
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,586
<BONDS>                                            761
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,513
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,040
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    61,452
<SALES>                                         44,414
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                44,414
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,266
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (47)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,789
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,879
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,910
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .46
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Rodriguez, Appellant.

[946 NYS2d 883]

*1080Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Sullivan, J.), imposed June 11, 2010, pursuant to the Drug Law Reform Act of 2004 (L 2004, ch 738), the Drug Law Reform Act of 2005 (L 2005, ch 643), and the Drug Law Reform Act of 2009 (CPL 440.46), resentencing him, inter alia, to three determinate terms of imprisonment of 15 years upon his convictions of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree (three counts), with two of those terms of imprisonment to run concurrently with each other and the third term of imprisonment to run consecutively to the first two.

Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.

Upon his convictions of three counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree, the defendant originally was sentenced to three determinate terms of imprisonment, with two of those terms of imprisonment to run concurrently with each other and the third term of imprisonment to fun consecutively to the first two. Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Drug Law Reform Acts of 2004, 2005, and 2009 (L 2004, ch 738; L 2005, ch 643; CPL 440.46) do not authorize the Supreme Court to alter his sentence so that all three terms of imprisonment run concurrently with each other *(see People v Acevedo,*14 NY3d 828, 831 [2010]; *People v Norris,*90 AD3d 788 [2011], *lv granted*18 NY3d 926 [2012]; *People v Norris,*90 AD3d 955 [2011], *lv granted*18 NY3d 926 [2012]; *People v Vaughan,*62 AD3d 122, 125-126 [2009]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court correctly concluded that it lacked authority to direct that all three terms of imprisonment run concurrently with each other. Mastro, A.P.J., Angiolillo, Austin and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
#### Ring Network, Inc., et al., Respondents, v Jack B. Solerwitz et al., Appellants.

— In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Levitt, J.), dated September 16, 1985, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion for a *562protective order and denied their cross motion for a protective order and for a "declaratory judgment” disqualifying the plaintiffs’ attorney.

Ordered that the order is modified, by adding a provision that the motion is denied, without prejudice to a further application by the defendants for leave to depose the plaintiffs’ counsel, upon proper notice, if it is warranted. As so modified, the order is affirmed, with costs.

The branch of the defendants’ cross motion which was to disqualify the plaintiffs’ counsel was supported only by an affidavit containing vague and conclusory allegations. Additionally, the defendants’ pleadings do not contain any allegations concerning the plaintiffs’ attorney. Thus, the defendants failed to demonstrate that the plaintiffs’ counsel knew, at the commencement of his representation, that it was "obvious” that he "ought to be called as a witness” *(see,*Code of Professional Responsibility, DR 5-102 [B]). There is also a total absence of proof that if the plaintiffs’ counsel was called as a witness other than on behalf of his client, that his testimony might be prejudicial to his client *(see,*Code of Professional Responsibility, DR 5-102 [B]). It is apparent that at this early stage in the proceedings, the defendants have failed to come forward with sufficient proof to disqualify the plaintiffs’ attorney *(see, Ocean-Clear, Inc. v Continental Cas. Co.,*94 AD2d 717). Therefore, Special Term’s granting of a protective order with respect to the deposition of the plaintiffs’ attorney was proper for procedural reasons *(see,*CPLR 3107, 3101 [a] [4]). However, this determination is without prejudice to a further application by the defendants for leave to depose the plaintiffs’ counsel, upon proper notice, if it is warranted *(see, Ocean-Clear, Inc. v Continental Cas. Co., supra; Planned Indus. Centers v Eric Bldrs.,*51 AD2d 586). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Niehoff and Spatt, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 4








Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 1350 of


Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350)





In connection with the Annual Report of Canadian Natural Resources Limited (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steve W. Laut, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





DATED this 24th day of March, 2014.











SIGNED “STEVE W. LAUT”


Steve W. Laut


President (Principal Executive Officer),


Canadian Natural Resources Limited
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS RESTATED SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF MARCH 31, 1997 AND FOR THE THREE MONTH
PERIOD THEN ENDED
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       5,066,029
<SECURITIES>                                24,739,434
<RECEIVABLES>                                  795,696
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    927,130
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            29,827,635
<PP&E>                                       2,862,928
<DEPRECIATION>                                 613,938
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              34,937,363
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,070,602
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,489
<OTHER-SE>                                  33,459,730
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                34,937,363
<SALES>                                      1,899,043
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,179,683
<CGS>                                          895,593
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,566,720
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (402,491)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                119,861        
<INCOME-TAX>                                    40,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             79,361
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    79,361
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.87


 


Borqs Technologies, Inc.


5201 Great America Parkway, Suite 320


Santa Clara, CA 95054, USA


 


June 14, 2021


 


Ms. Sherry H. Jiang


President


American West Pacific International Investment Corp


1 Sansome Street, Suite 3500


San Francisco, CA 94104, USA


 


		Re:	Engagement for Services



 


Dear Ms. Jiang:


 


This letter confirms our understanding that Borqs
Technologies, Inc. shall issue 2,412,698 ordinary shares to American West Pacific International Investment Corp, for services involving
the completion of the formation, funding and structuring the Mission College 5G R&D Center project, that has been initiated in the
month of January 2021 and continuing through the remainder of this year.


 


	 	For Borqs Technologies, Inc.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Anthony K. Chan
	 	 	Anthony K. Chan
	 	 	Chief Financial Officer


 


Accepted on behalf of


American West Pacific International Investment Corp.


 


	By:	/s/ Sherry H. Jiang	 
	 	President	 


 


Date: June 14, 2021
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARI)

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

Complainant

Docket Number: 2023 -0025

VS

MISLE Activity [D: 7 604707

ANTERIO WILLIAMS

Respondent.

WITHDRAWAL FROM DOCKET

The Coast Guard initiated an administrative proceeding by filing a Complaint on January 18,

2023, seeking a revocation or suspension of Respondent's Merchant Mariner Credential.

On Aug 16,2023. the Coast Guard filed a Motion of Withdrawal from docket as:

Respondent signed a Voluntary Surrender Agreement per 46 C.F.R.5.203.

This matter is removed from the docket and closed without prejudice effective this date. The

Coast Guard reserves the right to file a new Complaint in this matter.

Done and Dated August 17, 2023 at

Baltimore. MD

/-n4rr/*'W.hfur--

Lauren Meus

Hearing Docket Clerk

U.S. Coast Guard

By Direction of the Chief Administrative Law Judge

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

I
Exhibit 10.44

Univision Communications Inc.
1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 3050
Los Angeles, California 90067February 27, 2002

CONFIDENTIALGrupo Televisa S.A.
Av. Vasco de Quiroga No. 2000
Colonia Santa Fe
01210 Mexico, D.F.
Mexico

Re:

Acquisition of Fonovisa Music Group


Gentlemen:

We
refer to the letter agreement (the "Letter Agreement") dated December 19, 2001 (as amended), pursuant to which we have agreed to purchase and you have agreed to sell the Fonovisa
group of companies. In connection therewith, the parties hereby agree as follows:

(1)  To
extend the date for execution and delivery of the Long-form Agreement set forth in Section 5 of the Letter Agreement from February 8, 2002 to March 8, 2002.

(2)  To
extend the date of the Closing to the tenth (10th) business day following the satisfaction of the conditions set forth in Section 4 of the Letter
Agreement.

Except
as amended hereby, the Letter Agreement remains in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.

You
acknowledge that our representatives have assisted your representatives in preparing the disclosure schedules related to the Letter Agreement. You further agree and acknowledge that
the preparation of such disclosure schedules and the information included thereon or omitted thereform are your sole responsibility.

If
the foregoing sets forth over mutual agreement and understanding, please execute below.

| |  | Very truly yours,            
| |  | -----------------------------
| |  | UNIVISION COMMUNICATIONS INC.
| |  |                              
| |  | By:                          
| |  | Name:                        
| |  | Title:                       

---

ACCEPTED, AGREED TO AND ACKNOWLEDGED
This 27th day of February, 2002

|GRUPO TELEVISA S.A. |  |                              |  |       
|------------------- |  | ---------------------------- |  | ------
|By:                 |  | /s/JORGE LUTTEROTH ECHEGOYEN |  | By:   
|Name:               |  | Jorge Lutteroth Echegoyen    |  | Name: 
|Title:              |  | Attorney in Fact             |  | Title:
|By:                 |  | /s/JUAN S. MIJARES ORTEGA    |  |       
|Name:               |  | Juan S. Mijares Ortega       |  |       
|Title:              |  | Attorney in Fact             |  |       

---

QuickLinks
#### In re HONE. In the matter of the accounting of Frank J. Hone, as receiver of the property of Charles F. Lighthouse.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

April, 1896.)

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 ■costs and disbursements. ADAMS, J., not voting.
Exhibit 10.3


 


THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS


 


OF


 


COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT INC. 


 


 


The following is a true copy
of the resolution duly adopted by the Board of Directors of this Corporation at a special meeting, notice to this meeting having been
waived, held on this 18th day of June 2021;


 


The Board of Directors which was present for this
meeting & took active part therein was:


 


CHARLES ARNOLD


KEVIN HUMES


 


WHEREAS there has been presented
to and considered by this meeting a Motion to name qualified members to our Audit Committee;


 


NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED
that the corporation, having considered this matter, has opened the floor to all those who voice a preference in the issue, has decided
unanimously and RESOLVED that:


 


Ron Silver is hereby appointed
as Member of our newly formed Audit Committee.


 


Mr. Silver abstained from
this Vote, though enthusiastically accepts his appointment.


 


Said Motion is hereby passed
and the corporate books, records and the Secretary shall file this Resolution in the corporate records


 


 


DATED: 18th June, 2021 


 


 


/s/ David E. Price


David E. Price, Esq., Corp Secretary
Exhibit 32.1

Informational Addendum to Report on Form 10-Q

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Not Filed Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

The undersigned Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of OYO Geospace Corporation does hereby certify as follows:

Solely for the purpose of meeting the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and solely to the extent this
certification may be applicable to this Report on Form 10-Q, the undersigned hereby certifies that this Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in this Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OYO Geospace Corporation.



/s/ Gary D. OwensName:

Gary D. OwensTitle:

Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive OfficerMay 7, 2010
Listen

# U.S. Commission on Civil Rights Updates Agency Language Access Plan

November 15, 2023

The United States Commission on Civil rights announced today the release of its updated federal agency language access plan. The updated language access plan comes on the one-year anniversary of Attorney General Merrick B. Garland’s language access memorandum to federal agencies and features the Commission’s commitment to providing more reports and agency events with appropriate language access via translation and interpretation. 

In November 2022, Attorney General Garland directed federal agencies to revise their language access plans, share best practices and exchange information about language access initiatives and efforts in compliance with Executive Order 13166, “Improving Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency.” He tasked the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, which is responsible for ensuring consistent and coordinated government-wide compliance with Executive Order 13166 and Title VI, with leading this effort. 

The Commission’s federal agency language access plan can be found at https://www.usccr.gov/limited-english-proficiency-plan and on www.LEP.gov, a website maintained by the Civil Rights Division. 

Press Release

-  All News 
-  Commission News 
-  Advisory Committees News 
-  Correspondence 
-  Videos 
-  Archives