alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




            In connection with the quarterly report of Classic Bancshares, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
David B. Barbour, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: August 19, 2003                      /s/ David B. Barbour
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           David B. Barbour
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARI)

Address of Administrative Law Judge Docketing Center:

ALJ Docketing Center

U.S. Custom House

40 South Gay Street, Room 414

Baltimore, MD 212024027

Email: aljdocketcenter(r0uscq.mil

Phone: (410) 962-5100

Toll Free: (866) 612-7524 [6IA-SKCG]

Fax: (4lO) 962-1746

Toll Free Fax: (877) 243-3453 [CGE-FILE]

COMPI-AINANT:

I-INITED STATES COAST GUAR-D

RESPONDENT: Trever Shane Wallacc DOCKET NUMBER 202.]-002 I

WITHDRAWAL FROM DOCKET CG ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY NUMBER

76168.18

The Coast Guard initiated an administrative proceeding by filing a Complaint on January 18,

2023, seeking Revocation of Respondent's Merchant Mariner Credential.

On March 30, 2023, the Coast Guard filed a Notice of Withdrawal from docket as:

The Respondent signed a Voluntary Surrender Agreement under 46 CFR$ 5.203.

This matter is removed from the docket and closed without prejudice effective this date

Done and Dated April 3,2023 at

Baltimore, MD

/-ar/"-ar.'W.'7h//".

Lauren M. Meus

Hearing Docket Clerk

U.S. Coast Guard

By Direction of the Chief Administrative Law

Judge
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

Wntteb ~tate~ ~ourt of §ppeal~ 

for tbe jf eberal ~trcutt 

TUWANA ANTHONY, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, 

Respondent. 

2011-3145 

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. CH0752080323-I-4. 

ON MOTION 

Before PROST, MOORE, and O'MALLEY, Circuit Judges. 

MOORE, Circuit Judge. 

ORDER 

Tuwana Anthony moves to vacate the court's July 6, 

2012 dismissal order, recall the mandate, and reinstate 

this petition for review. 

Failure to comply with this court's rules, including 

failure to file an appendix, may result in dismissal of an 

appeal for failure to prosecute. Julien v. Zeringue, 864 
TUWANAANTHONYV. TREASURY 2 

F.2d 1572, 1574 (Fed. Cir. 1989) ("failure to comply with 

this court's rules, including the requirements for preparing and filing briefs, appendices and other papers, may 

result in dismissal of an appeal for failure to prosecute"). 

The court dismissed this petition on July 6, 2012 for 

failure to file an appendix. The time to request reconsideration of that order has long passed. Fed. R. App. P. 

45(a). We therefore deny Tuwana Anthony's motion to 

reinstate. 

Accordingly, 

IT Is ORDERED THAT: 

The motion to reinstate is denied. 

APR 11 2013 

Date 

cc: Thomas E. Marshall, Esq. 

Cameron Cohick, Esq. 

s26 

FOR THE COURT 

Is/ Jan Horbaly 

Jan Horbaly 

Clerk 

F~lf.9PEAIS FOil 

U.S.&mmeRP.l r,!RCUIT 

APR 11 2013 

JANHORBALY 

CLERK
#### The State v. Jesse Jurgins.

Article 409 of the Penal Code reads as follows: “ If any person shall play 'at any game with cards at any house for retailing spirituous liquors, storehouse, tavern, inn, or any other public house, or in any street, highway, or other public place, or in any outhouse where people resort, he shall be fined not less than $10 nor more than $25.” (Paschal’s Dig., Art. 2044, Note 610.) The charge that the playing was at “ a public house,” is too indefinite.

*589Appeal from Walker. The case was tried before Hon. ¡Nathaniel H. ¡Davis, one of the district judges.

The appellee was charged with playing at a game with cards in a public house in the town of Huntsville. A demurrer to the indictment was sustained, because of the vagueness and generality in describing the house where it was alleged the playing took place.

*JE. B. Turner, Attorney General,*for the state,

cited the State v. Alvey, 26 Tex., 185.

*A. J. McKinney,*for appellee.

—The statute under which the indictment was framed, (Paschal’s Dig., Art. 2044,) having made the phrase “ public house ” a generic term, it was not enough for the pleader to have employed that term only, but he should also have stated the species according to the truth of the case. (25 Tex., 654; 10 Tex., 610; Arch. Grim. Plead., 48; Bish. Grim. Law, 315.)

Lindsay, J.

—Upon the authority of the case of the State of Texas v. Martin Barns, 25 Tex., 654, this case must be affirmed. The charge in the indictment is, that the defendant played cards at a “ public house.” The charge is too vague and indefinite, and does not sufficiently put the defendant upon notice to enable him to prepare for his defense. This is a principle of administrative justice which should not be departed from. A warning should always be given before the blow is stricken. It may be readily imagined that a gentleman may have played cards at a number of private places which come not within the denunciation of the statute; and yet, when simply indicted for playing cards at a “public place,” he could not know from the charge which particular place he had to defend himself against, by showing that it was not a “ public place.” He might fortify himself against one by his proofs, and still the state might array its testimony to show the offense was committed at another.

Judgment aeeirmed.
# C_2021184EN.01000301.xml

| 12.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10197 — CSS/Visana/Zur Rose/medi24/WELL JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 184/03)

On 6 May 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in German language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10197. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10197. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	Mid Atlantic (D5)
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4619" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/DOD2/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="aprint factsheet">
    <div class="header">

        <img height="100" class="print-logo" alt="Site Logo" src="/Portals/0/Images/Official USCG Emblem.png?ver=0BEUcC5lxfanFqthfDyaOg%3d%3d" />

        <h1 class="title">Mid Atlantic (D5)</h1>
        <h3 class="date">
            Updated: June 27, 2018
        </h3>
    </div>
    
<div id="adetail-slick-gallery" class="gallery">
    
    <div class="item">
        
        <div class="image">
            
            <img src="https://media.defense.gov/2018/Jun/27/2001936338/1920/1080/0/180627-G-OY189-705.PNG"
                 class="aimage img-responsive"
                 alt="District 5: Delaware, Maryland, New Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Washington D.C"
                 itemprop="image" />
        </div>
        
        
        
        
        
        <div class="slide-info-hidden">
            <div class="slide-info-inner">
            
            <div class="image-title">District 5</div>
            <div class="image-caption">District 5: Delaware, Maryland, New Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Washington D.C</div>
        </div>
    </div>
    </div>

    
</div>
<div class="slide-info"></div>





    Fifth District Command Center Number: <span>(757) 398-6231 - For maritime emergency use only </span><br />
</div>

    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
Exhibit 32

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

The following statement is provided by the undersigned to
accompany the foregoing Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed filed pursuant to any provision of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or any other securities law.

Each of the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-Q fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Broadway Financial
Corporation at the dates and for the periods indicated.



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  |                                       
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------ |  | --------------------------------------
|                      |  |  | 
|Date: August 14, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Paul C. Hudson
|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  | Paul C. Hudson Chief Executive
Officer

|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  |                                       
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------ |  | --------------------------------------
|                      |  |  | 
|Date: August 14, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Samuel Sarpong
|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  | Samuel Sarpong Chief Financial
Officer
CERTIFICATIONS
 
 I, Raymond R. Brandstrom, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:
 
 1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Emeritus Corporation; 
 2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 
 3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 
 4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 
 (a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 
 (b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 
 (c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 
 5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 
 (a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 
 (b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 
 
 /s/    Raymond R. Brandstrom
 Raymond R. Brandstrom
 Chief Financial Officer
 January 27, 2005
#### TOMASELLI, Appellant, v. JOHN GRIFFITHS CYCLE CORP., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

December 22, 1896.)

Action by Lorenzo G. Tomaselli, Jr., against the John Griffiths Cycle Corporation.

No opinion. Motion for reargument denied. See 41 N. Y. Supp. 51.
GREEN TREE SERVICING LLC,

Appellant,

v.

JULIE POOSER a/k/a JULIE ANN 

POOSER, et al.,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-1820

_____________________________/

Opinion filed August 22, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Walton County.

Kelvin C. Wells, Judge.

John D. Cusick of Phelan Hallinan Diamond & Jones, PLLC, Ft. Lauderdale; 

Kimberly N. Hopkins of Shapiro, Fishman & Gaché, Tampa, for Appellant. 

No appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and RAY and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 10.2


 





AMENDMENT TO THE 


MUSTANG BIO, INC.


2019 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN


 


This Amendment to the Mustang Bio, Inc. 2019 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan (the “Plan”), is hereby adopted this 17th day of June, 2021, by the Board of Directors (the “Board”)
of Mustang Bio, Inc. (the “Company”).


 


WITNESETH:


 


WHEREAS, the Company adopted the Plan for
the purposes set forth therein; and


 


WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 21 of
the Plan, the Board has the right to amend the Plan with respect to certain matters, provided that any material increase in the number
of Shares available under the Plan shall be subject to stockholder approval; and


 


WHEREAS, the Board has approved and authorized
this Amendment to the Plan and has recommended that the stockholders of the Company approve this Amendment;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the
Plan is hereby amended, subject to and effective as of the date of stockholder approval hereof, in the following particulars:


 


		1.	Section 3 of the Plan is hereby amended by increasing the share reference in such section from 400,000
to 1,000,000, so that such section reads in its entirety as follows:



 


“3. Share Reserve. The
maximum number of shares which may be issued under the Plan shall be one million (1,000,000) shares of Mustang’s authorized but
unissued common stock, $0.0001 par value (the “Shares”). In the event that any Purchase Right for any reason expires or is
canceled or terminated, the Shares allocable to the unexercised portion of such Purchase Right may again be subjected to a Purchase Right.”


 


		2.	Except as specifically set forth herein, the terms of the Plan shall be and remain unchanged, and the
Plan as amended shall remain in full force and effect.



 


The foregoing is hereby acknowledged as being
the Amendment to the Plan, as adopted by the Board on April 28, 2021, and approved by the Company’s stockholders on June 17, 2021.


 


	 	MUSTANG
    BIO, INC.
	 	 
	 	By: 	/s/ Manuel Litchman, M.D.
	 	Manuel
    Litchman, M.D.
	 	President
    and Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6705
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RONNIE BUMPUS, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, District Judge. (CR-91-148, CA-94-500) Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: December 31, 1996 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronnie Bumpus, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, John Castle Parr, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), ame nded by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104- 132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistratejudge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Bumpus , Nos. CR-91-148; CA-94-500 (S.D.W. Va. Apr. 17, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                          Independent Auditors' Consent

The Board of Directors
Trigon Healthcare, Inc.:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-22463, 333-26187, 333-26189 and 333-26191) on Form S-8 of Trigon
Healthcare, Inc. of our report dated February 6, 2002, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Trigon Healthcare, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, changes in shareholders' equity and comprehensive income, and cash
flows, for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2001,
which report is incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K. We also consent to
the incorporation by reference in the aforementioned registration statements of
our report dated February 6, 2002, relating to the financial statement schedule
of Trigon Healthcare, Inc., which report appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Richmond, Virginia
March 26, 2002
2014 Harp Excerpts

FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

Britten: The Young Person’s Guide to the Orchestra (Variation I and Fugue)
2014 Harp Excerpts

FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
EXHIBIT 21



                                  SUBSIDIARIES


                                     State or Other Jurisdiction
                                        of Incorporation or
Registrant     Subsidiary                   Organization
----------     ----------                   ------------

Remington      Remington Capital Corp.           Delaware
Remington      Remington Consumer Products       United Kingdom
                 Limited
Remington      Remington Corporation, L.L.C.     Delaware
Remington      Remington Licensing Corporation   Delaware
Remington      Remington Products Australia      Victoria,Australia
                     Pty. Ltd.
Remington      Shaver Shop Pty. Ltd.             Victoria,Australia  
Remington      Remington Products (Canada), Inc. Canada
Remington      Remington Products GmbH           Germany
Remington      Remington Products New Zealand    New Zealand
                Limited
Remington      Remington Rand Corporation        Delaware





<PAGE>
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2021426EN.01001501.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 21.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 426/15 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10466 – Goldman Sachs/Eneos/NIPPO)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 426/11)

1.

On 12 October 2021, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 and following a referral pursuant to Article 4(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2021426EN.01001501-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (USA); |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Eneos Holdings, Inc. (Japan); |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | NIPPO CORPORATION (Japan). |

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Eneos Holdings, Inc. acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control over NIPPO CORPORATION.

The concentration is accomplished by way of a public bid announced on 7 September 2021.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for the Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.: global investment banking, securities and investment management, including a range of banking, securities and investment services to corporations, financial institutions, governments and individuals; |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for Eneos Holdings, Inc.: energy business, oil, metal and gas development; |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for NIPPO CORPORATION: manufacture and sale of asphalt mixtures and construction. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2021426EN.01001501-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10466 — Goldman Sachs/Eneos/NIPPO

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2021426EN.01001501-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2021426EN.01001501-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---