alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1                  
<CURRENCY> U.S.               
       
<S>                                                    <C>        
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        3-MOS        
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999        
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999       
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999        
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1        
<CASH>                                              42,614        
<SECURITIES>                                        44,884        
<RECEIVABLES>                                       41,244     
<ALLOWANCES>                                         2,850   
<INVENTORY>                                              0        
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   132,536 
<PP&E>                                              19,265  
<DEPRECIATION>                                       6,058   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     158,557 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               26,541  
<BONDS>                                                146   
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0        
<PREFERRED>                                             48        
<COMMON>                                                98       
<OTHER-SE>                                         131,470 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       158,557
<SALES>                                                  0        
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    30,168  
<CGS>                                                    0        
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       18,048   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    15,680   
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     1,274      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      21      
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (4,115)  
<INCOME-TAX>                                         (946)     
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (3,169)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0        
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0        
<CHANGES>                                                0        
<NET-INCOME>                                       (3,169)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.08)      
<FN>
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
# C_2021245EN.01000201.xml

| 24.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10294 — MUFG/SMFG/MHFG/Resona HD/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 245/02)

On 18. June 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10294. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10294. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
# C_2021484EN.01000501.xml

| 2.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 484/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 484/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10520 – CUMMINS / CHINA PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION / JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 484/05)

On 18 November 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10520. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10520. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
STATELINE RESERVOIRLatitude: 40.983Longitude: -110.39Elevation: 9196

STATELINE RESERVOIR

Courtesy NRCS - Go to EF Blacks Fork GS Site Page...



EF Blacks Fork GS

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Henrys Fork Site Page...



Henrys Fork

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Hewinta Site Page...



Hewinta

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Steel Creek Park Site Page...



Steel Creek Park
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                      12,909,129
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             1,473,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                     248,666,018
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                       249,961,796
<LOANS>                                    561,252,798
<ALLOWANCE>                                  7,824,995
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             845,074,487
<DEPOSITS>                                 438,876,527
<SHORT-TERM>                               145,000,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         13,433,780
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       171,925
<OTHER-SE>                                 247,592,255
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             845,074,487
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             11,193,955
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            4,447,357
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            15,641,312
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           5,947,190
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           7,729,846
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        7,911,466
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  374,397
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              6,585,751
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,262,923
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     776,698
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   776,698
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.92
<LOANS-NON>                                  7,396,639
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                             1,057,171
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             7,495,515
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   49,199
<RECOVERIES>                                     4,282
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            7,824,995
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         7,824,995
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2021073EN.01000101.xml

| 2.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9981 — Bain Capital/Ahlstrom-Munksjö)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 73/01)

On 8 January 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M9981. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M9981. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
# C_2021154EN.01000101.xml

| 30.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 154/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 154/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10207 — ICG/Dr. Axel Paeger/AMEOS)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 154/01)

On 26 April 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10207. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10207. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
PECOS RIVER NEAR ANTON CHICO, NMLatitude: 35.179Longitude: -105.109Elevation: 5154

PECOS RIVER NEAR ANTON CHICO, NM

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Wesner Springs Site Page...



Wesner Springs

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Elk Cabin Site Page...



Elk Cabin

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Santa Fe Site Page...



Santa Fe
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

This certification is intended to accompany the Annual Report of Precis, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), and is given solely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The undersigned, in my capacity as set forth below, hereby certifies that:



|Date: March 31, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ROBERT L. BINTLIFFRobert L. Bintliff
Chief Financial Officer
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2158 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2158

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend for one year the 
              credit for energy-efficient existing homes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 30, 2015

 Mr. Grayson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend for one year the 
              credit for energy-efficient existing homes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF CREDIT FOR ENERGY-EFFICIENT EXISTING HOMES.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 25C(g) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``December 31, 2014.'' and 
inserting ``December 31, 2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to property placed in service after December 31, 2014.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2021411EN.01000101.xml

| 11.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 411/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 411/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10457 — Carlyle/Schaltbau Holding)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 411/01)

On 4 October 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10457. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10457. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Exhibit 32.1



PERICOM SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED



PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this quarterly report of Pericom Semiconductor Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 27, 2004 (the
Report), I, Alex C. Hui, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.



May 11, 2004



By:

/s/ Alex C. HuiAlex C. HuiChief Executive OfficerPericom Semiconductor Corporation
#### FANCHER, Respondent, v. PINON, appellant.

(City Court of New York, General Term.

October 30, 1896.)

Action by Ezra B. Faneher against Bonifacio Pinon.

Coudert Bros., for appellant.

J. R. Faneher, for respondent.

SCHUCHMAN, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment recovered herein on a contract for tuition, board, and incidentals furnished to Louis Pinon, the son of the defendant, while attending, as a boarding pupil, the school of the plaintiff situated at Yonkers, Westchester county, N. Y. during the .school year of 1893 to 1894. The ■plaintiff in his complaint alleges, and at the trial proved, a contract for the tuition and board of the defendant’s son for the school year beginning the 25th day of September, 1893, and ending on June 8, 1894, at $500, payable half-yearly in advance; the second installment being payable on February 1, 1894. The defendant withdrew his son from said school on February 12 or 16, 1894. The plaintiff also proved that he furnished the defendant’s son clothing and other incidentals, of the value of $123.40. Defendant’s son was a pupil at plaintiff’s boarding school for two previous years, under the same agreement for said tuition and board and for incidentals. The action is brought for a breach on the part of the defendant of said agreement for tuition, board, etc. The plaintiff and his wife were the only witnesses on the trial on behalf of the plaintiff. The defendant offered no evidence whatsoever, and at the end of the trial made certain motions and requests to charge, which were denied by the court, and duly excepted to. We have examined these exceptions, and the only one worthy of any notice is the one denying the request to 'charge “that the question involved is a question of damages, and not a question of what the plaintiff is entitled to recover under the contract, and, as this included board, and board not having been furnished, the sole question before the jury is what damages the plaintiff sustained by reason of the defendant’s alleged failure to comply with his contract.” The damages in such, an action for the breach of contract are *1115prima facie the amount stipulated in the contract for the full term. Howard v. Daly, 61 N. Y. 362. The law, however, for wise reasons, imposes upon the paily subjected to injury by the breach of the contract the active duty of making reasonable exertion to render the injury as light as possible. Public interest and sound morality accord with the law in demanding this. A party ought not to recover more than his actual damage; but the burden of proving that the damages which have been sustained in such cases could have been prevented unquestionably rests upon the party guilty of the breach of contract. Hamilton v. McPherson, 28 N. Y. 77. In this case, therefore, the burden of proof was upon the defendant to show that the damages sustained on account of his breach of contract were less than the contract price. Not having done so, the law gives him no remedy on this appeal, and the ruling of the judge at the trial was correct. Judgment affirmed, with costs. FITZSIMOXS, J., concurs.
#### HOLDEN et al., Respondents, v. KUTSCHER, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

December 18, 1896.)

Action by William Holden and Charles Holden against Satie E. Kutscher.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur. See 40 N. Y. Supp. 737, 1143.
EX-10.21





 Exhibit 10.21 

Certain identified information marked with [***] has been excluded from the exhibit because it is both not material and is the type that the registrant
treats as private or confidential. 
 AMENDMENT #1 TO EXCLUSIVE LICENSE AGREEMENT 

BETWEEN IONQ, INC. DUKE UNIVERSITY AND UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND 

This Amendment #1 to the Exclusive License Agreement entered into by and between Duke University, a nonprofit educational and research
institution organized under the laws of North Carolina (“DUKE”) and ionQ, Inc. (“Licensee”) is effective as of the date of last signature below. 

Background: UMD and Licensee executed an Exclusive License Agreement dated effective July 19, 2016 (“Exclusive License
Agreement”). In connection with the Exclusive License Agreement, DUKE and Licensee executed an Exclusive Option Agreement, effective July 15, 2016 (“Option Agreement”). Under the terms and conditions of the Option Agreement, DUKE
granted Licensee and Licensee accepted an exclusive option during the Option Period (as defined in the Option Agreement) to obtain a worldwide exclusive license, with the right to sublicense, under the Exclusive License Agreement to DUKE’s
rights in Option IP (the “Option”). DUKE has disclosed certain Option IP to Licensee and Licensee elects to exercise its Option to license such Option IP by executing this Amendment #1 to the Exclusive License Agreement. To that end, DUKE
and Licensee hereby agree that the Exclusive License Agreement is amended as follows: 
 1. The definition of Licensed Inventions in Section 1.09 is
modified to add at the end of the definition: “and [***] and the related detailed descriptions.” 
 2. The patents listed on the attached Appendix
A shall be added to Appendix A of the Exclusive. 
 3. All other terms and conditions of the Exclusive License Agreement shall apply to the Option
Intellectual Property (as that term is defined in the Option Agreement) optioned by Licensee pursuant to the Option Agreement and identified in this Amendment as if such intellectual property had been included in the scope of the Exclusive License
Agreement as of its Effective Date. 
 4. Except for the amendments set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Exclusive License Agreement
remain in full force and effect. 
 ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO 
  

									
	DUKE UNIVERSITY	 		 	IONQ, INC.
					
	By:	 	 /s/ Robin L. Rasor
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ David L. Moehring

	Name:	 	Robin L. Rasor, MS, CLP	 		 	Name:	 	David L. Moehring
	Title:	 	Executive Director	 		 	Title:	 	CEO
		 	Office of Licensing and Ventures	 		 		 	
					
	Date:	 	22 September 2017	 		 	Date:	 	22 September 2017













 APPENDIX A - Duke Patents 

[***]