alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021078EN.01003401.xml

| 8.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 78/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/34

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10180 — BH Holding/TEDi)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 78/06)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | B.H. Holding GmbH (‘BH Holding’, Germany), controlled by Benjamin Heinig. |
| --- | --- |

—

B.H. Holding GmbH (‘BH Holding’, Germany), controlled by Benjamin Heinig.

| — | TEDi GmbH & Co. KG (‘TEDi’, Germany), currently jointly controlled by BH Holding and Tengelmann Warenhandelsgesellschaft KG (Germany, ‘Tengelmann’). |
| --- | --- |

—

TEDi GmbH & Co. KG (‘TEDi’, Germany), currently jointly controlled by BH Holding and Tengelmann Warenhandelsgesellschaft KG (Germany, ‘Tengelmann’).

BH Holding acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of TEDi.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | BH Holding holds and manages investments in various companies. Benjamin Heinig, a natural person and the sole shareholder of B.H. Holding, indirectly owns 100% of the shares in Woolworth GmbH, a retail chain with over 400 stores in Germany and is active in the non-food retail sector. |
| --- | --- |

—

BH Holding holds and manages investments in various companies. Benjamin Heinig, a natural person and the sole shareholder of B.H. Holding, indirectly owns 100% of the shares in Woolworth GmbH, a retail chain with over 400 stores in Germany and is active in the non-food retail sector.

| — | TEDi is active in the non-food retail sector at locations in Czechia, Germany, Spain, Croatia, Italy, Austria, Poland, Slovenia, and Slovakia. The product portfolio offered by TEDi includes everyday items and consumables. |
| --- | --- |

—

TEDi is active in the non-food retail sector at locations in Czechia, Germany, Spain, Croatia, Italy, Austria, Poland, Slovenia, and Slovakia. The product portfolio offered by TEDi includes everyday items and consumables.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10180 — BH Holding/TEDi

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
Exhibit 10.40


 


THE USE OF THE FOLLOWING
NOTATION IN THIS EXHIBIT INDICATES THAT THE CONFIDENTIAL PORTION HAS BEEN OMITTED PURSUANT TO ITEM 601(b)(10)(iv) WHEREBY CERTAIN IDENTIFIED
INFORMATION HAS BEEN EXCLUDED BECAUSE IT IS BOTH NOT MATERIAL AND WOULD LIKELY CAUSE COMPETITIVE HARM IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED: [***]


 


AMENDMENT TO COMPONENTS SUPPLY AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment to Components Supply Agreement
(the “Amendment”) is entered into as of January 19, 2017 (the “Amendment Effective Date”), by and
between QUALCOMM CDMA Technologies Asia-Pacific Pte. Ltd., a Singapore corporation (“QCTAP”) and Airspan Networks,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Buyer”), who hereby agree to amend that certain Components Supply Agreement dated November 20,
2014 (the “CSA”) as follows:


 


1. Exhibit C, List of Agents.
As of the Amendment Effective Date, Exhibit C to the CSA is amended by adding the following new Agent:


 


		●	[***]


 


2. No Other Amendment or Modification.
Except as expressly set forth in this Amendment, the CSA remains in full force and effect without modification. The terms and conditions
of this Amendment and the CSA shall not be modified or amended except by a writing signed by authorized representatives of both Parties.


 


3. Signatures. This Amendment
may be executed in identical counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original and, which taken together, shall be deemed
to constitute the agreement when a duly authorized representative of each Party has signed a counterpart. Each Party agrees that the delivery
of this Amendment by facsimile shall have the same force and effect as delivery of original signatures and that each Party may use facsimile
signatures and photocopies of signatures as evidence of the execution and delivery of this Amendment by each Party to the same extent
that an original signature could be used.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have
caused this Amendment to be executed as of the date first set forth above.


 


	QUALCOMM
    CDMA Technologies

    Asia-Pacific Pte Ltd.	Airspan
    Networks, Inc.
	 	 
	By: /s/ Merwin
    Wilfred                                     	By: /s/ David
    Brant                                        
	Print Name:
    Merwin Wilfred	Print Name:
    David Brant
	Print Title:
    Director, Operations	Print Title:
    CFO


 


 


QCTAP Confidential/Proprietary
#### In the Matter of Data Tree, LLC, Appellant, v Edward P. Romaine, Respondent.

Submitted March 19, 2007;

decided May 8, 2007

Motion by LexisNexis et al. for leave to file a brief amici curiae on the motion for leave to appeal herein granted and the brief is accepted as filed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

# AGENCY:

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given of the appointment of members to the Performance Review Board (PRB) of the EEOC.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Shelita Aldrich, Director, Operations Services Division, EEOC, 131 M Street NE, Washington, DC 20507, (202) 921-3089.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Publication of the PRB membership is required by 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4). The PRB reviews and evaluates the initial appraisal of a senior executive's performance by the supervisor, and makes recommendations to the Chair, EEOC, with respect to performance ratings, pay level adjustments, and performance awards.

The following are the names and titles of executives appointed to serve as members of the Senior Executive Service PRB. Designated members will serve a 12-month term, which begins on November 1, 2021.

## PRB Chair

Mr. Kevin Richardson, Chief Human Capital Officer, EEOC

## Members

Ms. Julianne Bowman, Director, Chicago District, EEOC

Mr. Carlton Hadden, Director, Office of Federal Operations, EEOC

Mr. Richard Toscano, Director, Equal Employment Opportunity Staff, U.S. Department of Justice

Ms. Veronica Venture, Director, EEO and Diversity, Department of Homeland Security

Ms. Rosa Viramontes, Director, Los Angeles District, EEOC (Alternate)

Ms. Gwendolyn Reams, Associate General Counsel for Litigation Management Services, EEOC (Alternate)

By the direction of the Commission.

Mona Papillon,

Deputy Chief Operating Officer.

[FR Doc. 2021-20062 Filed 9-16-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6570-01-P
WILLOW CREEK RESERVOIRLatitude: 40.147Longitude: -105.943Elevation: 8130

WILLOW CREEK RESERVOIR

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Never Summer Site Page...



Never Summer

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Stillwater Creek Site Page...



Stillwater Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Willow Creek Pass Site Page...



Willow Creek Pass
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 19

- 00675

- CV

IN RE Sarah Friend NEUTZE

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 16, 2019

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On October 3, 2019, r elator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After considering the

petition and the record, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sou ght. Accordingly,

the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2016 CV2 002017, styled In re: Farmers Insurance Company Wind H ail

Storm Litigation 2 , pending in the 341 st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas, the Honorable Elma T. Salinas

Ender presiding.
# C_2021016EN.01000401.xml

| 15.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/4

---

Summary of Commission Decision

of 6 March 2020

relating to a proceeding under Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

(Case AT.40335 – Romanian gas interconnectors)

(notified under document C(2020) 1232)

(Only the English text is authentic)

(2021/C 16/04)

On 6 March 2020, the Commission adopted a decision relating to a proceeding under Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. In accordance with the provisions of Article 30 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (1), the Commission herewith publishes the names of the parties and the main content of the decision, including any penalties imposed, having regard to the legitimate interest of undertakings in the protection of their business secrets.

(1)

The case concerns Societatea Națională de Transport Gaze Naturale Transgaz S.A. (‘Transgaz’), the sole manager and operator of the natural gas transmission network in Romania.

(2)

The concern of the Commission was that Transgaz may have abused its dominant position on the market for natural gas transmission in Romania by creating or maintaining barriers to the cross-border flow of natural gas from Romania to other Member States, in particular Hungary and Bulgaria. Such conduct could lead to the partitioning of the internal market along national borders and discrimination between customers in Romania and customers in other Member States.

(3)

The Commission considers that the commitments offered by Transgaz following the preliminary assessment and the observations submitted by interested third parties are sufficient to address the identified competition concerns. Firstly, the commitments provide that Transgaz will make available increased capacities for natural gas exports towards Hungary and Bulgaria. Secondly, the commitments provide that Transgaz will ensure that the tariff proposals it submits to the Romanian energy regulator will not discriminate against exports. Finally, the commitments provide that Transgaz will not prevent, hinder, or discriminate against, directly or indirectly, gas exports through any other means.

(4)

The decision finds that, in light of the commitments, there are no longer grounds for action by the Commission. The decision will be binding until 31 December 2026.

(5)

The Advisory Committee on Restrictive Practices and Dominant Positions issued a favourable opinion on 19 February 2020.

---

(1)  OJ L 1, 4.1.2003, p. 1.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2270 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2270

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To redesignate the Nisqually National Wildlife Refuge, located in the 
State of Washington, as the Billy Frank Jr. Nisqually National Wildlife 
Refuge, to establish the Medicine Creek Treaty National Memorial within 
              the wildlife refuge, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Billy Frank Jr. Tell Your Story 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REDESIGNATION OF THE NISQUALLY NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE.

    (a) Redesignation.--The Nisqually National Wildlife Refuge, located 
in the State of Washington, is redesignated as the ``Billy Frank Jr. 
Nisqually National Wildlife Refuge''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in any statute, rule, regulation, 
Executive Order, publication, map, paper, or other document of the 
United States to the Nisqually National Wildlife Refuge is deemed to 
refer to the Billy Frank Jr. Nisqually National Wildlife Refuge.

SEC. 3. MEDICINE CREEK TREATY NATIONAL MEMORIAL, WASHINGTON.

    (a) Establishment.--There is established the Medicine Creek Treaty 
National Memorial within the Billy Frank Jr. Nisqually National 
Wildlife Refuge to commemorate the location of the signing of the 
Medicine Creek Treaty of 1854 between the United States Government and 
leaders of the Muckleshoot, Nisqually, Puyallup, and Squaxin Island 
Indian Tribes.
    (b) Acreage and Administration.--The Secretary of the Interior 
shall establish the boundaries of the Medicine Creek Treaty National 
Memorial and provide for administration and interpretation of the 
memorial by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service.
    (c) Coordination.--The Secretary of the Interior shall coordinate 
with representatives of the Muckleshoot, Nisqually, Puyallup, and 
Squaxin Island Indian Tribes in providing for the interpretation of the 
Medicine Creek Treaty National Memorial.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 30, 2015.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2270

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To redesignate the Nisqually National Wildlife Refuge, located in the 
State of Washington, as the Billy Frank Jr. Nisqually National Wildlife 
Refuge, to establish the Medicine Creek Treaty National Memorial within 
              the wildlife refuge, and for other purposes.
```
# C_2021472EN.01000501.xml

| 23.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 472/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 472/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10430 – TOWERBROOK / BRUNEAU GROUP)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 472/05)

On 6 October 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10430. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10430. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2021390EN.01001201.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 27.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 390/12 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10389 – PAI Partners/Pasubio)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 390/08)

1.

On 17 September 2021, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 and following a referral pursuant to Article 4(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2021390EN.01001201-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | PAI Partners (France), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Pasubio (Italy). |

PAI Partners acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Pasubio.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for PAI Partners: managing and/or advising dedicated private equity funds, which acquire majority participations in companies active in different industry sectors, such as business services, food and consumer goods, general industrials, healthcare and retail & distribution; |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for Pasubio: tanning of leather and the production of finished leather products for use in various sectors, including automotive interiors, furniture and luxury goods. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2021390EN.01001201-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10389 – PAI Partners/Pasubio

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2021390EN.01001201-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2021390EN.01001201-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
#### Power Authority of the State of New York, Appellant, v Gregory Cannata et al., Respondents. (And Another Related Action.)

— Casey, J.

Appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court (Tait, Jr., J.), entered June 26, 1986 in Otsego County, which denied plaintiff’s motions to renew its prior applications for preliminary injunctions.

Upon presentation of additional material facts which have occurred since the denial of its previous motion, plaintiff was entitled to renew its applications for preliminary injunctions *(see, Matter of Dondi v Jones,*40 NY2d 8, 15; *see also,*2A Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac ¶ 2221.03; 2 CarmodyWait 2d, NY Prac § 8:73, at 95; *but see, Donnelly v Donnelly,*114 AD2d 671, 672). On the merits, since the facts and circumstances herein are virtually identical to those in certain related actions where plaintiff’s motions for preliminary injunctive relief were granted *(see, e.g., Power Auth. of State of N. Y. v Bowen,*121 AD2d 840), plaintiff is entitled to preliminary injunctive relief herein.

Orders reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, motions to renew granted and, upon renewal, motions for preliminary injunctions granted. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Casey, Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.
HRPO - LOST RIVER AT HARPOLD DAMLatitude: 42.17Longitude: -121.453Elevation: None

HRPO - Lost River at Harpold Dam

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Swan Lake Mtn Site Page...



Swan Lake Mtn

Courtesy NRCS - Go to State Line Site Page...



State Line

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Strawberry Site Page...



Strawberry

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Gerber Reservoir Site Page...



Gerber Reservoir

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Crowder Flat Site Page...



Crowder Flat
#### MOONEY, Appellant, v. NEW YORK EL. R. CO. et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 6, 1896.)

' Action by Daniel Mooney against the New York Elevated Railroad Company and others.

E. W. S. Johnston, for appellant.

B. (Tolies, for respondents.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. See 38 N. Y. Supp. 688.