alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs

          - [212A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900253G]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the extension of the Class III gaming compact between  the Rosebud Sioux Tribe of the Rosebud Indian Reservation and the State of South Dakota.

# DATES:

The extension takes effect on September 7, 2021.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of  Indian Gaming, Office of the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs, Washington, DC 20240,  (202) 219-4066.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

An extension to an existing Tribal-State Class III gaming compact does not require approval by the Secretary if the extension does not modify  any other terms of the compact. 25 CFR 293.5. The Rosebud Sioux Tribe of the Rosebud Indian Reservation and the State of South Dakota have reached an agreement to extend the expiration date of their existing Tribal-State Class III gaming compact to April 18, 2022. This publication provides notice of the new expiration date of the compact.

Bryan Newland,

Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2021-19337 Filed 9-3-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4337-15-P
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1938 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1938

   To suspend temporarily the duty on certain chemicals used in the 
                   formulation of anti-cancer drugs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 3, 1998

 Mrs. Feinstein (for herself and Mrs. Boxer) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on certain chemicals used in the 
                   formulation of anti-cancer drugs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.32.15      4-Phenoxypyridine                                                                        
                        (CAS No. 4783-86-                                                                       
                        2) (provided for                                                                        
                        in subheading                                                                           
                        2933.39.61)......  Free         No change         No change         On or before 12/    
                                                                                             31/1999            
                                                                                                                

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
P u rsuan t t o 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5, t h e courtha s det erm i n ed that t h i s opi n i on * shou l d n otbe pu bl i shed an d i s not preceden t except u n der t h e l i m i t ed c i r c um s t anc e s s e tf

o r t h i n 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5. 4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 40427 Su m m ar y Cal endar
W AYNE ER NEST BAR KER Pl ai nt i f f

- Appe l l ant

v. ANN SW EET EN; NURSE PR ACT I TI ONER FUENTES ; J ULI E S W EET EN D efen da n t s- A pp el l ees
A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e Sou t h ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 3: 05- C V

- 87

B e fo r e S M IT H , S T E W A R T a n d S O U T H W IC K , C ir c u it J u d g e s .
P E R C U R I A M: * W ayn e E rnest B arker, T exas pri soner # 900 9 8 7 , ap pea l s t h e di st ri ct
c o ur t ’ s di s m i s s alo f

hi s pr o se an d i n f o r m a pa upe r i s c i vi lr i ght s c o m pl ai nt p u rs u an tt o 42 U
. S
. C
. § 1997 e f or fai l u re t o exh au stadm i n i st rat i ve rem edi es. Bar ke ra l s o r e que s t s pe r m i s s i o n t o fi l e a s upp l e m e nt ala ppe l l at e b r i e f
. The
m o t i o n t o f

i l e a s upp l e m e nt alb r i e f i s de ni e d. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Aug ust24, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 08- 40427

2 B ar keradm i t t edl y m ade no at t em pt t o pur sue pr i so n adm i n i st r at i ve rem edi es, bu the argu es t h at t h e di sm i ssalof h is com pl ai n t w as err or because t h e T exa s D epa rt m en tof C ri m i n alJu st i ce gri evan ce proc edu res w ere not avai l abl e t o hi m . H e c ont ends t hat he sho ul d be exc use d f r om the § 19 9 7e exh au st i on requi rem en tdu e to h i s p h ysi cala n d m en t alp robl em s, a n d h e argu es t h at t h e di st ri ctcourt ’ s d ism i ssalof hi s c om pl ai n t vi ol ates F ED . R. A PP . P. 28. W e fin d n o e r r o r in th e d is tr ic t co u r t’s d is m is s a l o f th e co m p la in t. S ee W oodf ord
v. N go , 5 4 8 U .S . 8 1 , 8 8 -8 9 (2 0 0 6 ); B oot h v. C h u rner , 5 3 2 U .S . 7 3 1 , 7 3 9 -4 1 & n .6 (2 0 0 1 ). M OT I ON T O F I L E S UP P L EMENT AL B RI EF DE NI ED ; A F F I RMED.
#### In the Matter of Thomas H. Oberle, Appellant, v Rose Caracappa, Respondent-Respondent, et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding to invalidate a petition designating Rose Caracappa as a candidate in the Republican Party primary election to be held on September 15, 1987, for the public office of Suffolk County Legislator, Fourth Legislative District, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gerard, J.), dated August 19, 1987, which denied the application. The notice of appeal from the decision of Justice Gerard dated August 10, 1987, is deemed a premature notice of appeal from the judgment (see, CPLR 5520 [c]).

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme *203Court, Suffolk County, for a new hearing and determination on all issues.

The petitioner Thomas H. Oberle, candidate for the Suffolk County Legislature from the Fourth Legislative District, commenced a proceeding challenging the designating petition filed by Rose Caracappa, a candidate for the same office. The pleading incorporated by reference line by line written specifications served upon Caracappa and filed with the Board of Elections, and thereafter listed 25 grounds which were stated in general terms challenging the Caracappa designating petition. Another paragraph of his pleading challenged the designating petition on the basis of fraud.

At the trial, the court dismissed the proceeding. We now reverse and remit.

Although it is true that the 25 grounds listed in the petitioner’s pleading were asserted in general terms, the specifications were incorporated by reference. Thus the trial court erred in dismissing those claims for lack of specificity since the pleadings and specification combined together possessed the required specificity *(see, Matter of Cohen v Moss,*97 AD2d 644).

The trial court also erred when it refused to allow the petitioner to call to the stand the witnesses already present in the courtroom, in response to subpoenas which were summarily quashed by the court. It further erred when it did not permit testimony as to what the subscribing witnesses said when presenting the Caracappa petition for signature. The trial court considered such testimony to be hearsay, but it is settled law that hearsay exists only when an out-of-court statement is introduced for the truth of the matter asserted in that statement, not when such testimony is introduced merely to demonstrate that the statement was made *(see, Matter of Bergstein v Board of Educ.,*34 NY2d 318, 324).

Finally, in view of the issues referred to above, at the new hearing, if the trial court finds that the testimony of Alan D. Oshrin is necessary, he should be disqualified as Caracappa’s trial counsel *(see, S & S Hotel Ventures Ltd. Partnership v*777 *S. H. Corp.,*69 NY2d 437, 445-446). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Thompson, Lawrence and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
#### TAYLOR, Respondent, v. CHAMBERLAIN, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 13, 1896.)

Action *1133by Alexander Taylor against Robert L. Chamberlain.

No opinion. Motion for reargument denied, with $10 costs. See 39 N. Y. Supp. 737.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration # 17155 and # 17156; North Carolina Disaster Number NC-00127]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of North Carolina (FEMA-4617-DR), dated 09/08/2021. *Incident:* Remnants of Tropical Storm Fred. *Incident Period:* 08/16/2021 through 08/18/2021.
 DATES: Issued on 09/08/2021. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:* 11/08/2021. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:* 06/08/2022.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 09/08/2021, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans):* Buncombe, Haywood, Transylvania. *Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):* North Carolina: Henderson, Jackson, Madison, McDowell, Rutherford, Swain, Yancey. South Carolina: Greenville, Oconee, Pickens. Tennessee: Cocke, Sevier. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
3.125Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.563Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere
5.710Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.855Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.000Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.000*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.855Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 17155 8 and for economic injury is 17156 0. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) James Rivera, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2021-19869 Filed 9-14-21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
#### Nathan R. PEAVY, Claimant-Appellant, v. R. James NICHOLSON, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 2007-7092.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

June 28, 2007.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of Nathan R. Peavy’s unopposed motion to dismiss his appeal,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted.

(2) All sides shall bear their own costs.
ROARING FORK RIVER AT GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO.Latitude: 39.544Longitude: -107.329Elevation: 5720.73

ROARING FORK RIVER AT GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO.

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Chapman Tunnel Site Page...



Chapman Tunnel

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Upper Taylor Site Page...



Upper Taylor

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Brumley Site Page...



Brumley

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Independence Pass Site Page...



Independence Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Ivanhoe Site Page...



Ivanhoe

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Kiln Site Page...



Kiln

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Mc Clure Pass Site Page...



Mc Clure Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Nast Lake Site Page...



Nast Lake

Courtesy NRCS - Go to North Lost Trail Site Page...



North Lost Trail

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Schofield Pass Site Page...



Schofield Pass
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Michael Lee DOUGLAS, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 07-6279.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 2007.

Decided: May 31, 2007.

Michael Lee Douglas, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller, Office of the United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Lee Douglas seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the rec*362ommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Douglas has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
PURGATOIRE RIVER AT NINEMILE DAM NEAR HIGBEELatitude: 37.715Longitude: -103.511Elevation: 4240.60

PURGATOIRE RIVER AT NINEMILE DAM NEAR HIGBEE

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Apishapa Site Page...



Apishapa

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Culebra #2 Site Page...



Culebra #2

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Whiskey Ck Site Page...



Whiskey Ck
#### In re: Ernest W. WILLIS, Debtor. Ernest W. Willis, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Deborah Menotte, Red Reef, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 10-11980.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

April 21, 2011.

Kevin C. Gleason, Kevin C. Gleason, P.A., Hollywood, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

John H. Pelzer, Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster & Russell, P.A., David Marshall Brown, Brown, Van Horn P.A., Stephen B. Rakusin, The Rakusin Law Firm, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, Michael Richard Bakst, Morris Gary Miller, Ruden McClosky Smith Schuster & Russell, P.A., Heather Ries, Attorney at Law, West Palm Bch., FL, Robert Charbonneau, Ehrenstein Charbonneau Calderin, Miami, FL, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before PRYOR and COX, Circuit Judges, and WATKINS,* District Judge.

*

 Honorable W. Keith Watkins, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Alabama, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

Ernest W. Willis appeals the judgment that assets in three of his retirement accounts are not exempt from his bankruptcy estate. The Bankruptcy Code provides an exemption for “retirement funds to the extent that those funds are in a fund or account that is exempt from taxation under section 401, 403, 408, 408A, 414, 457, or 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.” 11 U.S.C. § 522(b)(3)(C). The bankruptcy court and the district court determined that Willis engaged in several prohibited transactions under section 408 of the Internal Revenue Code and caused the assets to lose their tax-exempt status. 26 U.S.C. §§ 408(e)(2), 4975(c)(1). All of Willis’s arguments on appeal lack merit, and he has failed to establish that the bankruptcy court committed any reversible error. We affirm based on the well-reasoned opinion of the district court.

The judgment against Willis is AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit32.1**

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Tim Paterson-Brown, Chief Executive Officer of MGTCapital Investments, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of myknowledge:

(1)                                                                                  the Quarterly Report on Form10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)                                                                                  the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 
|                   | By:    | /s/ TIM  PATERSON-BROWN  |   |
|------------------------|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|                   |   | Tim  Paterson-Brown      |   |
|                   |   | Chief  Executive Officer |   |
| November  7, 2007 |   |                     |   |
VEGA RESERVOIRLatitude: 39.222Longitude: -107.8Elevation: 7986

VEGA RESERVOIR

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Mesa Lakes Site Page...



Mesa Lakes

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Overland Res. Site Page...



Overland Res.

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Park Reservoir Site Page...



Park Reservoir
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before HACKEL , GARRISON , and DALY Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES Appellee

v.
Erian SEVERINOGONZALEZ Lance Corporal (E

- 3 ), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant

No. 202300165

_________________________
Decided: 28 September 2023
Appeal from the United States Na vy
- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge :

Yong J. Lee
Sentence adjudged 13 April 2023 by a special court

- martial convened at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California, consisting of a military judge sitting alone

. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment : reduction to E

- 1 and a bad

- conduct discharge

. For Appellant: Lieutenant Morgan A. Sanders , JAGC, USNUnited States v. SeverinoGonzalez , NMCCA No. 20 2 300165 Opinion of the Court

2 ______ ___________________ This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2 (a)

.

_________________________
PER CURIAM : After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, and Appellant having not challenged th e factual sufficiency of this case, we have determined that the findings are correct in law, the sentence is correctin law and fact, and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. 1
T he findings and sentence are AFFIRM ED

.

FOR THE COURT:

MARK K. JAMISON Clerk of Court

1 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
<PAGE>

                               HAMBRECHT & QUIST GROUP

                                     Subsidiaries


    Company:                      Hambrecht & Quist California

    Business:                     Investment banking

    Percentage of ownership:      100%

    Date Organized:               December 1, 1982

    Place of Organization:        California



    Company:                      Hambrecht & Quist L.L.C.

    Business:                     Investment banking, securities brokerage

    Percentage of ownership:      100% (indirect - wholly-owned subsidiary of
                                  Hambrecht & Quist California)

    Date organized:               March 8, 1995*

    Place of Organization:        Delaware


--------------------------------
    * Date limited liability company formed.
SAN RAFAEL RIVER NEAR GREEN RIVER, UTLatitude: 38.85Longitude: -110.367Elevation: 4186

SAN RAFAEL RIVER NEAR GREEN RIVER, UT

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Huntington Horse Site Page...



Huntington Horse

Courtesy NRCS - Go to GBRC HQ Site Page...



GBRC HQ

Courtesy NRCS - Go to GBRC Meadows Site Page...



GBRC Meadows

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Mt Baldy Site Page...



Mt Baldy

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Thistle Flat Site Page...



Thistle Flat

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Upper Joes Valley Site Page...



Upper Joes Valley

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Wrigley Creek Site Page...



Wrigley Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Buck Flat Site Page...



Buck Flat

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Mammoth-Cottonwood Site Page...



Mammoth-Cottonwood

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Red Pine Ridge Site Page...



Red Pine Ridge

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Seeley Creek Site Page...



Seeley Creek
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Robert P. Traversa, Principal
Financial Officer of MGT Capital Investments, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2013 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|May 20, 2013 | By: | /s/ ROBERT P. TRAVERSA               
|------------ | --- | -------------------------------------
|             |     | Robert P. Traversa                   
|             |     | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer