alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.22





 Exhibit 10.22 

Certain identified information marked with [***] has been excluded from the exhibit because it is both not material and is the type that
the registrant treats as private or confidential. 
 AMENDMENT #1 TO EXCLUSIVE LICENSE AGREEMENT 

BETWEEN IONQ, INC. AND UNIVERSITIY OF MARYLAND 

This Amendment #1 to the Exclusive License Agreement (Amendment) entered into by and between the University of Maryland (UMD) and ionQ, Inc. (Licensee) is
effective as of the date of last signature below. 
 Background: UMD, through its Office of Technology Commercialization, and Licensee executed an Exclusive
License Agreement dated effective July 19, 2016 (Exclusive License Agreement). In connection with the Exclusive License Agreement, UMD and Licensee executed an Exclusive Option Agreement, effective July 19, 2016 (Option Agreement). Under the
terms and conditions of the Option Agreement, UMD granted Licensee and Licensee accepted an exclusive option during the Option Period to obtain a worldwide exclusive license, with the right to sublicense, under the Exclusive License Agreement to
UMD’s rights in Option IP (the “Option”). UMD has disclosed certain Option IP to Licensee and Licensee elects to exercise its Option to license such Option IP by executing this Amendment 1 to the Exclusive License Agreement. To that
end, UMD and Licensee hereby agree that the Exclusive License Agreement is amended as follows: 
 1. The definition of Licensed Inventions in
Section 1.09 is modified to add at the end of the definition: “and [***] and the related detailed descriptions.” 
 2. Appendix A to the
Exclusive License Agreement is modified by adding the following to the list of Patent Rights:[***] 
 3. All other terms and conditions of the Exclusive
License Agreement shall apply to the Option Intellectual Property (as that term is defined in the Option Agreement) optioned by Licensee pursuant to the Option Agreement and identified in this Amendment as if such intellectual property had been
included in the scope of the Exclusive License Agreement as of its Effective Date. 
 4. Except for the amendments set forth herein, all other terms and
conditions of the Exclusive License Agreement remain in full force and effect. 
  

									
	ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO	 		 		 	
				
	UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND	 		 		 	IONQ, INC.
					
	BY	 	 /s/ Felicia Metz
	 		 	BY	 	 /s/ David Moehring

	Name:	 	Felicia Metz	 		 	David Moehring
					
	Title:	 	Assistant Director	 		 	CEO	 	
	DATE:	 	Oct. 11, 2017	 		 	DATE:	 	20 September 2017
#### Julius R. Nasso, Appellant, v Loeb & Loeb, LLP, Respondent.

Submitted November 13, 2006;

decided January 9, 2007

*828Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Exhibit
32.1 - Certification
of Principal Executive and Financial Officer





CERTIFICATION
IN ACCORDANCE WITH


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED BY


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Internet America, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the three months ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William
E. Ladin, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge
that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ William E. Ladin,
Jr.William
      E. (Billy) Ladin, Jr.Chief
      Executive Officer and ActingChief
      Financial OfficerDate:
      November 15,
      2010
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northwest Pipe Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard A. Roman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ RICHARD A. ROMAN                 
|Richard A. Roman                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|November 15, 2010
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Lawrence R. C. HORNER, Private, U.S. Army, Appellant.

No. 30,082.

U. S. Court of Military Appeals.

Nov. 28, 1975.

*Colonel Victor A. DeFiori, Lieutenant Colonel James Kucera, Captain Ralph E. Sharpe,*and *Captain Ronald Lewis Gallant*were on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel Donald W. Hansen, Major Steven M. Werner, Captain Robert P. Terzian, Captain Joel M. Martel, Captain Dale L. Anderson,*and *Captain Richard S. Kleager*were on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

At petitioner’s trial by special court-martial, the military judge failed to instruct the court on the sentence voting procedures provided by paragraph 76b (2), Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1969 (Rev). In light of the punitive discharge imposed in this case, a rehearing on the sentence is required. *United States v. Johnson,*18 U.S.C.M.A. 436, 40 C.M.R. 148 (1969).

Accordingly, the decision of the U.S. Army Court of Military Review as to the sentence is reversed. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army. A rehearing on sentence may be ordered.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-17-00725-CV

John RICHMOND,

Appellant

v.

VRM (VENDOR RESOURCE MANAGEMENT), Duly Authorized Agent for the Secretary 

of Veterans Affairs,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017-CV-03985

Honorable Karen Crouch, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 17, 2018

MOTION GRANTED, DISMISSED

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. We grant the motion. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(a)(1). Because the motion does not disclose an agreement of the parties regarding the 

assessment of costs, we order all costs assessed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d)

(absent agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against appellant).

PER CURIAM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          39,946
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,629
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     48,168
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               104,831
<PP&E>                                          18,798
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,407
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 142,446
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           71,050
<BONDS>                                         10,568
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           138
<OTHER-SE>                                      58,380
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   142,446
<SALES>                                        321,583
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               321,583
<CGS>                                          271,650
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  271,650
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                38,796
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,193
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,944
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,362
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,582
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,582
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .42


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Bohdan Donald Swystun, Appellant.

Memorandum: The evidence adduced at the suppression hearing clearly establishes that the information conveyed to the police officer concerning attempts by defendant to cash a stolen check at a local department store was sufficiently trustworthy to establish probable cause for the officer to arrest defendant (CPL 140.10 [1] [b]; *People v Brnja,*50 NY2d 366, 373). Thus, the court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress contraband found on his person as the product of an unlawful arrest.

We have examined defendant’s other arguments and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Mark, J. — criminal possession of forged instrument, second degree.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Green, Balio, Lawton and Schnepp, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Johnnie Mae Davis, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Vaughn, J.), rendered March 4, 1985, convicting her of manslaughter in the first degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, *405following a hearing, of so much of the defendant’s omnibus motion as sought the suppression of certain statements to law enforcement officials.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

In view of the uncontroverted testimony of a police officer that the defendant, after spontaneously revealing that she had beaten her son, agreed to waive her rights and speak with the police in the absence of counsel, there is sufficient evidence on record to support the determination of the hearing court regarding the admissibility of the defendant’s statements *(see, People v Gee,*104 AD2d 561, *lv denied*64 NY2d 759).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Mangano, J. P., Weinstein, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2



Informational Addendum to Report on Form 10-Q

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Not Filed Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934



The undersigned Chief Financial Officer of OYO Geospace Corporation does hereby certify as follows:



Solely for the purpose of meeting the requirements of Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and solely to the extent this certification may be applicable to this Report on Form 10-Q, the undersigned hereby certify that this Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in this Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OYO Geospace Corporation.



/s/ Thomas T. McEntireName: Thomas T. McEntireTitle:     Chief Financial OfficerAugust 10, 2004
# C_2021236EN.01001401.xml

| 18.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 236/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 236/14

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10280 – ABP/Slaney/Linden)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 236/07)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | ABP Food Group (‘ABP’, Ireland), |
| --- | --- |

—

ABP Food Group (‘ABP’, Ireland),

| — | Slaney Foods International (‘Slaney’, Ireland), currently joinly controlled by ABP and Fane Valley, |
| --- | --- |

—

Slaney Foods International (‘Slaney’, Ireland), currently joinly controlled by ABP and Fane Valley,

| — | Linden Foods Limited (‘Linden’, Ireland), currently jointly controlled by ABP and Fane Valley. |
| --- | --- |

—

Linden Foods Limited (‘Linden’, Ireland), currently jointly controlled by ABP and Fane Valley.

ABP acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Slaney and Linden. The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | for ABP: slaughtering of cattle and ovine animals (lamb and sheep), processing of their meat and collection and processing of associated animal by-products, |
| --- | --- |

—

for ABP: slaughtering of cattle and ovine animals (lamb and sheep), processing of their meat and collection and processing of associated animal by-products,

| — | for Slaney and Linden: slaughtering of cattle and ovine animals, the processing of their meat and the collection and processing of animal by-products in Ireland and Belgium Slaney and in the UK for Linden. |
| --- | --- |

—

for Slaney and Linden: slaughtering of cattle and ovine animals, the processing of their meat and the collection and processing of animal by-products in Ireland and Belgium Slaney and in the UK for Linden.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10280 – ABP/Slaney/Linden

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
<PAGE>   1




                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form
S-8 (No. 333-91651) of The viaLink Company of our report dated February 22,
1999, except as to the stock splits described in Note 8 and Note 13 relating to
the 1997 and 1998 share and per share data, which is as of March 14, 2000,
relating to the financial statements which appear in this annual report on Form
10-KSB.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP


Dallas, Texas
April 27, 2001
CONEJOS RIVER NEAR MOGOTELatitude: 37.054Longitude: -106.187Elevation: 8280

CONEJOS RIVER NEAR MOGOTE

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Grayback Site Page...



Grayback

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Cumbres Trestle Site Page...



Cumbres Trestle

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Lily Pond Site Page...



Lily Pond
#### PEOPLE ex rel. JEFFERSON, Appellant, v. ROOSEVELT et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

December 11, 1896.)

Certiorari by

Thomas Jefferson against Theodore Roosevelt

and others.

L. J. Grant, for appellant.

T. Connoly, for respondents.

No opinion. Proceedings affirmed, with costs.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [8982-01-OA]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protect ion Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act,       ( print page 51355)    notice is hereby given that the next meeting of the Children's Health Protection Advisory Committee (CHPAC) will be held virtually November 2 and 3, 2021. The CHPAC advises the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on science, regulations and other issues relating to children's environmental health.

# DATES:

November 2, 2021 from 12:30 p.m. to 6 p.m. and November 3, 2021 from 12:30 p.m. to 6 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will take place virtually. If you want to listen to the meeting or provide comments, please email *louie.nica@epa.gov* for further details.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Nica Louie, Office of Children's Health Protection, U.S. EPA, MC 1107T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460, (202) 564-7633 or *louie.nica@epa.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meetings of the CHPAC are open to the public. An agenda will be posted to *https://www.epa.gov/​children/​childrens-health-protection-advisory-committee-chpac.*

*Access and Accommodations:* For information on access or services for individuals with disabilities, please contact Nica Louie at 202-564-7633 or *louie.nica@epa.gov.*

Dated: September 9, 2021.

Nica Mostaghim,

Environmental Health Scientist.

[FR Doc. 2021-19833 Filed 9-14-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
# C_2021034EN.01002901.xml

| 1.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 34/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 34/29

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10072 — Sojitz/Eneos/Edenvale Solar Park)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 34/10)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Sojitz Corporation (‘Sojitz’, Japan), |
| --- | --- |

—

Sojitz Corporation (‘Sojitz’, Japan),

| — | Eneos Corporation (‘Eneos’, Japan), a wholly owned subsidiary of ENEOS Holdings, Inc. (Japan), |
| --- | --- |

—

Eneos Corporation (‘Eneos’, Japan), a wholly owned subsidiary of ENEOS Holdings, Inc. (Japan),

| — | Edenvale Solar Park Pty Ltd. (‘Edenvale’, Australia), belonging to DPI Solar 3 Pte ltd (Singapore). |
| --- | --- |

—

Edenvale Solar Park Pty Ltd. (‘Edenvale’, Australia), belonging to DPI Solar 3 Pte ltd (Singapore).

Sojitz Corporation and Eneos Corporation acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the whole of Edenvale.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | for Sojitz Corporation: the trading of good and services and in particular the construction and exploitation of energy and social infrastructure with a focus on solar, wind and biomass power generation, |
| --- | --- |

—

for Sojitz Corporation: the trading of good and services and in particular the construction and exploitation of energy and social infrastructure with a focus on solar, wind and biomass power generation,

| — | for Eneos Corporation: the production, trading and marketing of crude oil, petroleum products, petrochimicals, electricity, lubricant, coal and hydrogen, |
| --- | --- |

—

for Eneos Corporation: the production, trading and marketing of crude oil, petroleum products, petrochimicals, electricity, lubricant, coal and hydrogen,

| — | for Edenvale: will develop, construct and operate a solar farm in Queensland, Australia. |
| --- | --- |

—

for Edenvale: will develop, construct and operate a solar farm in Queensland, Australia.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10072 — Sojitz/Eneos/Edenvale Solar Park

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
August 9, 2016



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ALBERT JAMES BROAD NAX , Appellant

NO. 14

- 15

- 00599

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

. We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.