alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2014331DE.01004002.xml

| 18.11.2014 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 331/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2014

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 331/40

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 552/2009 der Kommission vom 22. Juni 2009 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1907/2006 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates zur Registrierung, Bewertung, Zulassung und Beschränkung chemischer Stoffe (REACH) hinsichtlich Anhang XVII

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 164 vom 26. Juni 2009
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 164 vom 26. Juni 2009

Auf Seite 26, im Anhang zur Änderung von Anhang XVII der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1907/2006, unter Nummer 2, Spalte 2, Eintrag 52:

anstatt:

| „2. | Spielzeug und Babyartikel, die diese Phthalate in Konzentrationen von mehr als 0,1 Gew.- % des weichmacherhaltigen Materials enthalten, dürfen nicht in Verkehr gebracht werden.“ |
| --- | --- |

„2.

Spielzeug und Babyartikel, die diese Phthalate in Konzentrationen von mehr als 0,1 Gew.- % des weichmacherhaltigen Materials enthalten, dürfen nicht in Verkehr gebracht werden.“

muss es heißen:

| „2. | Solche Spielzeuge und Babyartikel, die diese Phthalate in Konzentrationen von mehr als 0,1 Gew.- % des weichmacherhaltigen Materials enthalten, dürfen nicht in Verkehr gebracht werden.“ |
| --- | --- |

„2.

Solche Spielzeuge und Babyartikel, die diese Phthalate in Konzentrationen von mehr als 0,1 Gew.- % des weichmacherhaltigen Materials enthalten, dürfen nicht in Verkehr gebracht werden.“

---
[866 NE2d 1041, 834 NYS2d 713]

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William E. Miller, Appellant.

Argued March 27, 2007;

decided April 26, 2007

*938APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Edward J. Nowak, Public Defender,*Rochester *{David M. Abbatoy, Jr.,*of counsel), for appellant.

*Michael C. Green, District Attorney,*Rochester *{Stephen X. O’Brien*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed. Defendant’s argument that he did not receive a hearing in accordance with due process of law is unpreserved for our review. We do not accept defendant’s contention that the error here, if any, constitutes a mode of proceedings error.

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.
# C_2021061EN.01000401.xml

| 22.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 61/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 61/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9779 — Alstom/Bombardier Transportation)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 61/04)

On 31 July 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9779. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9779. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
----

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL**OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT****TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

     I, Marc M. Hazout, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Kfairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of Silver Dragon Resources Inc. 

Dated: March 31, 2010 

By: */s/*Marc M. Hazout                   Marc M. Hazout       Chief Executive Officer 

----
#### James S. GARVEY, et al., petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 83-1855.

Oct. 1, 1984.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1932 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1932

   To amend the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 to allow 
   employers a grace period to abate certain occupational health and 
  safety violations before being subject to a penalty under such Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 22, 2015

Mrs. Hartzler introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 to allow 
   employers a grace period to abate certain occupational health and 
  safety violations before being subject to a penalty under such Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GRACE PERIOD ON OSHA PENALTIES.

    (a) Citations.--Section 10(a) of the Occupational Safety and Health 
Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 659(a)) is amended by inserting after the first 
sentence the following: ``No such penalty may be assessed for a 
violation that is determined not to be willful, repeated, or serious as 
described in section 17(k), during the period of time fixed for 
abatement of the violation in the citation issued under section 9(a) or 
final order issued under this section, as the case may be, and no such 
penalty may be assessed for such a violation if such violation shall 
have been abated by the employer in accordance with such citation or 
final order before the end of such time period.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 174 (Monday, September 13, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 50903]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19679]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. DEA-899]


Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Application: Eli-
Elsohly Laboratories

AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Justice.

ACTION: Notice of application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Eli-Elsohly Laboratories has applied to be registered as a 
bulk manufacturer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer 
to Supplementary Information listed below for further drug information.

DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class(es), 
and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to 
the issuance of the proposed registration on or before November 12, 
2021. Such persons may also file a written request for a hearing on the 
application on or before November 12, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement 
Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 
8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this 
is notice that on August 5, 2021, Eli-Elsohly Laboratories, 5 
Industrial Park Drive, Oxford, Mississippi 38655, applied to be 
registered as an bulk manufacturer of the following basic class(es) of 
controlled substance(s):

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Drug
         Controlled substances             code          Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marihuana Extract......................     7350  I
Marihuana..............................     7360  I
Tetrahydrocannabinols..................     7370  I
Amphetamine............................     1100  II
Methamphetamine........................     1105  II
Cocaine................................     9041  II
Codeine................................     9050  II
Dihydrocodeine.........................     9120  II
Ecgonine...............................     9180  II
Thebaine...............................     9333  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances 
for product development and reference standards. In reference to drug 
codes 7360 (Marihuana) and 7370 (Tetrahydrocannabinols), the company 
plans to isolate these controlled substances from procured 7350 
(Marihuana Extract). In reference to drug code 7360, no cultivation 
activities are authorized for this registration. In reference to drug 
code 9333 (Thebaine), the company plans to manufacture a Thebaine 
derivative. No other activities for these drug codes are authorized for 
this registration.

Brian S. Bresser,
Acting Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2021-19679 Filed 9-10-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	Great Lakes (D9)
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4619" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/DOD2/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="aprint factsheet">
    <div class="header">

        <img height="100" class="print-logo" alt="Site Logo" src="/Portals/0/Images/Official USCG Emblem.png?ver=0BEUcC5lxfanFqthfDyaOg%3d%3d" />

        <h1 class="title">Great Lakes (D9)</h1>
        <h3 class="date">
            Updated: June 27, 2018
        </h3>
    </div>
    
<div id="adetail-slick-gallery" class="gallery">
    
    <div class="item">
        
        <div class="image">
            
            <img src="https://media.defense.gov/2018/Jun/27/2001936332/1920/1080/0/180627-G-OY189-709.PNG"
                 class="aimage img-responsive"
                 alt="District 9: Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Winsconsin"
                 itemprop="image" />
        </div>
        
        
        
        
        
        <div class="slide-info-hidden">
            <div class="slide-info-inner">
            
            <div class="image-title">District 9</div>
            <div class="image-caption">District 9: Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Winsconsin</div>
        </div>
    </div>
    </div>

    
</div>
<div class="slide-info"></div>





    <p>Ninth District Command Center Number: <span>(216) 902-6117 - For maritime emergency use only</span></p>
<br />
</div>

    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
Listen

# Briefing Reports

-    First  
-    Previous  
-   ...  
-  7 
-  8 
-  9 
-  10 
-  11 

-  All Reports 
-  Annual Statutory Enforcement 
-  Briefing Reports 
-  Advisory Committees Reports 
-  Budget and Performance 
-  FOIA Reports 
-  Data Inventory Program 
-  Civil Rights Complaints 
-  Historical Publications 
-  Archives
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 25, 2010 

p0517 

Order 

 

May 25, 2010 

140271 

LUCKY 7 DEVELOPMENT L.L.C. and 

GRANDE POINTE DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C., 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v SC: 140271 

 COA: 293462 

St Clair CC: 08-000717-AA 

CLAY TOWNSHIP, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 16, 2009 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### EVANS, Respondent, v. KIRCHER et al., Appellants. SAME v. DOLAN et al. SAME v. FALVEY. SAME v. FREY.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 13, 1896.)

Action by William L. Evans against Louis H. Kircher and another, and three other cases.

E. W. S. Johnston, for appellants.

S. Hanford, for respondent.

No opinion. Orders made by Mr. Justice Andrews on May 20, 1896, modified by adding the same provisions as were inserted in the orders made by Justices Giegerich, Truax, and Stover with respect to the payment of the expenses of the oral cross-examination, and also adding leave to the defendants to subject the witnesses to an oral re-direct examination, the plaintiff, however, to pay the expenses of such oral re-direct examination; and, as thus modified, the order is affirmed, without costs.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Germaine JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-30818

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 17, 2007.

*485Howard Cobb Parker, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Wayne Joseph Blanchard, Federal Public Defender’s Office Western District of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA, for Defendants Appellant.

Before DeMOSS, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

John Germaine Jackson was convicted by a jury of one count of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(e). Jackson was sentenced to 24 months of imprisonment and a two-year term of supervised release.

This court will uphold a jury’s verdict if a reasonable trier of fact could conclude from the evidence that the elements of the offense were established beyond a reasonable doubt. *United States v. Delgado,*256 F.3d 264, 273-74 (5th Cir.2001). The evidence, both direct and circumstantial, is viewed in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict; all credibility determinations and reasonable inferences are to be resolved in favor of the verdict. *United States v. Resio-Trejo,*45 F.3d 907, 910, 911 (5th Cir.1995).

At trial, Jackson stipulated that he is a convicted felon and that the firearm found at the scene was in, or affected, interstate commerce. Consequently, the only fact for the jury to decide was whether Jackson was in knowing possession of a firearm. *See United States v. Ybarra,*70 F.3d 362, 365 (5th Cir.1995). Jackson argues that the evidence was insufficient to convict him because none of the Government’s witnesses testified that they saw him in possession of the firearm on the day of his arrest. Jackson also argues that there was no evidence that the area where the firearm was found could not have been accessed by the public, and contends that although the Government could have obtained fingerprint, DNA, or other forensic evidence, to link him to the firearm, it failed to do so.

*486Given the evidence, however, the jury could have drawn the plausible inference that Jackson had a gun in his possession and attempted to conceal it from police. *See United States v. McCowan,*469 F.3d 386, 390-91 (5th Cir.2006). Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict, a reasonable trier of fact could have concluded beyond a reasonable doubt that Jackson possessed the firearm. *See United States v. Delgado,*256 F.3d 264, 273-74 (5th Cir.2001); *Resio-Trejo,*45 F.3d at 910.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                       5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from SEC
     Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
     statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0001001540             
<NAME>                          Lexington Global Asset Managers, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      U.S. Dollar
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1
<CASH>                          7,169,322
<SECURITIES>                    1,753,174
<RECEIVABLES>                   2,016,415
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                10,687,289
<PP&E>                          1,423,425
<DEPRECIATION>                  222,431
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  16,368,250
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           3,803,583
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        54,879
<OTHER-SE>                      12,066,369
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    16,368,250
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                14,391,707
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 3,618,969
<INCOME-TAX>                    1,277,655
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             2,299,570
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    2,299,570
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   .43
<EPS-DILUTED>                   .43
        


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 13.1**
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Radcom Ltd. (the“Company”) for the period ending December 31, 2003 (the “Report”), I, ArnonToussia-Cohen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:
1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: May 5, 2004 */s/ Arnon Toussia-Cohen*Arnon Toussia-CohenChief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,676
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   83,010
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,780
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               135,298
<PP&E>                                         243,650
<DEPRECIATION>                                  31,528
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 347,214
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          530,278
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,094
<OTHER-SE>                                   (196,158)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   347,214
<SALES>                                         46,774
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                58,035
<CGS>                                           27,067
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,456
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               146,208
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,906
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (115,629)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (116,429)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (116,429)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.009)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.009)
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Patrick J. O’Connell, Appellant.

Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Casey, Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.
USGS 11505800 - UPPER KLAMATH LAKE AT ROCKY POINT, ORLatitude: 42.478Longitude: -122.088Elevation: 35.01

USGS 11505800 - UPPER KLAMATH LAKE AT ROCKY POINT, OR

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Cold Springs Camp Site Page...



Cold Springs Camp

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Fourmile Lake Site Page...



Fourmile Lake

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Sevenmile Marsh Site Page...



Sevenmile Marsh
Exhibit 10.11.3

Amendment No. 10 (the "Amendment") To
Employment Agreement (the "Employment Agreement") between
George W. Blank ("Employee") and Univison Management Co. ("Company")

Employee
and Company agree to amend the Employment Agreement as follows:

1.Term. The Term of the Employment Agreement is extended through December 31, 2006, unless earlier terminated in
accordance with the provisions of the Employment Agreement.

2.Salary. The annual Base Salary rate will be: Six Hundred Thousand Dollars ($600,000) for the annual period from
January 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006.

3.Effective Date of Amendment. Upon execution by Employee and Company, this Amendment will become effective as of
January 1, 2004.

4.Other. Except as provided in this Amendment, all other terms and conditions in the Employment Agreement will remain in
full force and effect, and the Employment Agreement, as amended hereby, is ratified and confirmed.

|                                  |  | UNIVISION MANAGEMENT CO.
|--------------------------------- |  | ------------------------
|                                  |  | By:                     
|/s/GEORGE W. BLANKGeorge W. Blank |  |                         

---

QuickLinks