alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2058 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to provide for a 

certain effective date with respect to deemed tobacco products, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 28, 2015 

Mr. COLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to 

provide for a certain effective date with respect to 

deemed tobacco products, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘FDA Deeming Author5 ity Clarification Act of 2015’’. 


Emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2058 IH

1 SEC. 2. DATE FOR APPLICATION OF FEDERAL FOOD, DRUG, 

2 AND COSMETIC ACT TO DEEMED TOBACCO 

3 PRODUCTS. 

4 Section 901(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cos5 metic Act (21 U.S.C. 387a(b)) is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘This chapter shall apply’’ and 

7 inserting the following: 

8 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—This chapter shall apply’’; 

9 and 

10 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

11 paragraph: 

12 ‘‘(2) DEEMED TOBACCO PRODUCTS.—For each 

13 tobacco product deemed subject to the requirements 

14 of the Act pursuant to paragraph (1), each reference 

15 in sections 905(j) and 910(a)— 

16 ‘‘(A) to ‘February 15, 2007’, shall be con17 sidered to be a reference to ‘the effective date 

18 of the regulation under which a tobacco product 

19 is deemed subject to the requirements of this 

20 Act pursuant to section 901(b)(1)’; and 

21 ‘‘(B) to ‘21 months after the date of enact22 ment of the Family Smoking Prevention and 

23 Tobacco Control Act’, shall be considered to be 

24 a reference to ‘21 months after such effective 

25 date’.’’. 

Æ 


Emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
BILLY J. WILLIAMS, OSB #901366

United States Attorney

District of Oregon

ETHAN D. KNIGHT, OSB #992984

GEOFFREY A. BARROW

CRAIG J. GABRIEL, OSB #012571

Assistant United States Attorneys

ethan.knight@usdoj.gov

geoffrey.barrow@usdoj.gov

craig.gabriel@usdoj.gov

1000 SW Third Ave., Suite 600

Portland, OR 97204-2902

Telephone: (503) 727-1000

Attorneys for United States of America

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

RYAN PAYNE,

Defendant.

3:16-CR-00051-BR-4

GOVERNMENT’S RESPONSE TO

DEFENDANT PAYNE’S MOTION TO

SUPPRESS SEIZED EMAILS (#711)

The United States of America, by Billy J. Williams, United States Attorney for the

District of Oregon, and through Ethan D. Knight, Geoffrey A. Barrow, and Craig J. Gabriel,

Assistant United States Attorneys, hereby responds to Defendant Payne’s Motion to Suppress

Seized Emails (ECF No. 711).

I. Government’s Position

Prosecutors in the District of Nevada applied for the warrant at issue in the District of

Nevada. The Honorable Nancy J. Koppe signed the warrant on June 6, 2014. The warrant

authorized the seizure of information from two email accounts associated with defendant Ryan

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 794 Filed 06/29/16 Page 1 of 2
Government’s Response to Defendant Payne’s Motion to Suppress Seized

Emails (#711)

Page 2

Payne. It was executed on June 6, 2014, and Google provided information in response to the

warrant to agents in the District of Nevada on June 16, 2014.

The government does not intend to introduce at trial any evidence obtained from the

District of Nevada’s email warrant, with one exception: the government reserves the right to use

evidence from the Nevada email warrant to impeach a defendant at trial, if that defendant’s

testimony is inconsistent with the defendant’s prior statements contained in the evidence

obtained from the email warrant.

At this time, the government is not aware of any evidence the government obtained as

fruits of the returns of the Nevada email warrant. However, the government has informed

counsel for Mr. Payne that if fruits of the Nevada email warrant are later identified or discovered,

the government will confer with defense counsel to determine how best to proceed.

The government therefore respectfully recommends that the Court deny defendant’s

Motion with respect to the Nevada email warrant relating to Payne as moot, with leave to renew.

Dated this 29th day of June 2016.

Respectfully submitted,

BILLY J. WILLIAMS

United States Attorney

s/ Geoffrey A. Barrow

ETHAN D. KNIGHT, OSB #992984

GEOFFREY A. BARROW

CRAIG J. GABRIEL, OSB #012571

Assistant United States Attorneys

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 794 Filed 06/29/16 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2



Informational Addendum to Report on Form 10-K

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Not Filed Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934



The undersigned Chief Financial Officer of OYO Geospace Corporation do hereby certify as follows:



Solely for the purpose of meeting the requirements of Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and solely to the extent this certification may be applicable to this Report on Form 10-Q, the undersigned hereby certify that this Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in this Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OYO Geospace Corporation.



/s/    Thomas T. McEntireName:    Thomas T. McEntireTitle:      Chief Financial OfficerAugust 11, 2003
REPORT  OF  INDEPENDENT  ACCOUNTANTS  ON  FINANCIAL  STATEMENT  SCHEDULE

To  the  Stockholders  and  Board  of  Directors  of
RockShox,  Inc.:

Our  audits  of the consolidated financial statements of RockShox, Inc. referred
to  in  our  report dated April 27, 1999 appearing in this Annual Report on Form
10-K  also  included an audit of the financial statement schedule listed in Item
14(a)(2)  of this Form 10-K for the years ended March 31, 1999 and 1998.  In our
opinion,  this  financial  statement  schedule  presents fairly, in all material
respects,  the  information set forth therein for the years ended March 31, 1999
and  1998  when  read  in  conjunction  with  the related consolidated financial
statements.

PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP


     San  Jose,  CA
     April  27,  1999


                                       57
<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       6,028,577
<SECURITIES>                                56,161,537
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  4,035,022
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            81,105,451
<PP&E>                                      12,337,853
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,697,160
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             101,285,887
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,737,073
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       168,727
<OTHER-SE>                                  93,426,189
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               101,285,887
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,186,317
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               30,008,497
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             377,951
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (26,584,480)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (26,584,480)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (26,584,480)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.58)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.01

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Transmeta Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Matthew R. Perry,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company for the periods presented therein.

Date: August 4, 2004                      By: /s/ MATTHEW R. PERRY
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer,
                                          Transmeta Corporation

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Transmeta Corporation and will be retained by Transmeta
Corporation and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001017157
<NAME>                        GENETIC VECTORS, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         109,924
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,620
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    13,500
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               242,521
<PP&E>                                         403,355
<DEPRECIATION>                                 125,427
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 913,725
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          350,150
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2,350
<OTHER-SE>                                     561,225
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   913,725
<SALES>                                        47,172
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               47,172
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,684,446
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             61,807
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,575,467)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,575,467)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,575,467)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (1.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (1.10)



</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-41101

Summary Calendar 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee 

v. 

FRANCISCO ANTONIO GRIEGO, 

Defendant-Appellant 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 2:15-CR-1100-1 

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Francisco Antonio 

Griego has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Griego has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 11, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-41101 Document: 00514067452 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/11/2017
No. 16-41101

2 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-41101 Document: 00514067452 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/11/2017
FIL ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTHCI RCUI T FEB 17, 2011 J OHN L EY CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE U

NITED STATE S COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 0- 12 81 7 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock etNo. 5 :0 9- cr-0 00 71 -CAR- CWH-1 UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A, Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll ee, ve rs us CLAUDIO LOPEZ, Defen da nt -Ap pe ll an t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt forth e Mi dd le Dis tri ctof Ge or gi a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ (Feb ru ary 17 , 20 11 ) Befo re TJ OFLAT, BARKETT an d KRAVITC H, Circ ui t Jud ge s. PER CURI AM: Cl au di o Lo pe z ap pe al s h is sen te nc e o f 55 m on th s’ im pr is on m en t af

te r pl ead in g g ui lt y

to il le ga ll y

re-e nt eri ng th e Uni te d S ta te s af te r ha vi ng pre vi ou sl ybe ende po rte d, i n v io la ti on of 8 U.S.C. § 1 32 6( a). On app eal , Lop ez ar gu es th at

hi s s en te nc e was un reas on ab le
. W e rev ie w th e rea so nabl en es s o f a s en te nc e und er a d efer en ti al ab us e-o f-d is cret io n s ta nd ard . Gall v. Un it edSta te s, 5 52 U.S. 38 , 41 (20 07 ). The pa rty who c ha ll en ge s the sen te nc e m us t es tabl is h t ha t the sen te nc e is un reas on ab le in th e li gh t o f bo th th e rec or d a ndth e fac to rs in18 U.S.C. § 3 55 3( a). Uni te d St at es v. Tal le y , 43 1 F .3d78 4, 7 88 (11 th Cir . 20 05 ). Inth is cas e, Lop ez h as no t m ethi s b ur de n t o s ho w th athi s s en te nc e, whi ch fel l i n t he m id dl e o f th e g ui de li ne ran ge , was unr eas on ab le . The rec or d b el ie s h is arg um en t tha t the di st ric t co urt fa il edto co ns id er h is arg um en ts inm it ig at io n. No r do es th e rec or d s up po rt h is arg um en t tha t the co urt fa il edto pro vi de a se nt en ci ng rat io na le . Ind eed , th e d is tri ctco urt em ph as iz edLop ez’s ex te ns iv e cri min al hi st ory , whi chin cl ud ednu m ero us dru g c on vi ct io ns an d p la cedhi m inth e h ig he st cri m in al hi st ory

cat eg ory . Alth ou gh th e d is tri ctco urt re li edpri m ari ly on thi s fact or , su chrel ia nc e was no t u nr eas on ab le gi ve n t he sev eri ty of Lop ez’s cri m in al hi st ory . The rec or d fu rth er b el ie s Lo pe z’s arg um en t tha t the di stric t co urt treat ed th e Gui de li ne s as m an da to ry , rathe r th anadvi so ry . Accor di ng ly, we affi rm . AFFIRMED.

2
Exhibit 99.3


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                SECTION 906 OF
                        THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



          In connection with the Quarterly Report of Blount International,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, James S. Osterman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. {section} 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer's knowlege:

      (i)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the report.

A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been
provided to Blount International, Inc. and will be retained by Blount
International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.


Date: August 14, 2003

/s/ James S. Osterman
____________________________________
James S. Osterman
President and
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-34559, 333-47017,
333-56794, 333-99037, 333-109721 and 333-119724) and the Registration Statements (Form S-3 Nos. 333-105933 and
333-110981) of our reports dated March 7, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Univision Communications Inc. and subsidiaries,
Univision Communications Inc. management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of
Univision Communications Inc. and subsidiaries, included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004.

|                                 | /s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP
|-------------------------------- | --------------------
|New York, New York
March 7, 2005 |                     

---



QuickLinks
#### Simon *v.*Craft.

Appeal from Mobile Circuit Court.

Tried before the Hon. William S. Anderson.

Gregory L. & H. T. Smith, for appellant.

Pillans, Torrey & Hanaw and Bestor & Gray, for appellee.

This action was brought by the appellant against the appellee. The present appeal is prosecuted from a judgment in favor of the defendant.

The judgment is affirmed on the authority of *Craft v.*Simon, 118 Ala. 625.

Opinion by

Dowdell, J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DATED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         255,445
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  677,146
<ALLOWANCES>                                   46,453
<INVENTORY>                                    3,022,723
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4,022,517
<PP&E>                                         2,737,630
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,079,618
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6,081,404
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,734,488
<BONDS>                                        975,623
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       4,599
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,291,228
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6,081,404
<SALES>                                        3,107,151
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,107,151
<CGS>                                          1,824,572
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,824,572
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,374,376
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               1,091,797
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             61,897
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,153,694)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,153,694)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,153,694)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.24)
        


</TABLE>
LRSC - LOST RIVER D/S CLEAR LAKE DAMLatitude: 41.928Longitude: -121.074Elevation: None

LRSC - Lost River d/s Clear Lake Dam

Courtesy NRCS - Go to State Line Site Page...



State Line

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Strawberry Site Page...



Strawberry

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Gerber Reservoir Site Page...



Gerber Reservoir

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Crowder Flat Site Page...



Crowder Flat
# L_2011211DE.01003502.xml

| 18.8.2011 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 211/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.8.2011

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 211/35

---

Berichtigung des Beschlusses 2010/96/GASP des Rates vom 15. Februar 2010 über eine Militärmission der Europäischen Union als Beitrag zur Ausbildung somalischer Sicherheitskräfte

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 44 vom 19. Februar 2010
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 44 vom 19. Februar 2010

Seite 16, rechtsetzendes Organ:

anstatt:

„DER EUROPÄISCHE RAT —“

muss es heißen:

„DER RAT DER EUROPÄISCHEN UNION —“.

---
# C_2006296EN.01003001.xml

| 6.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/30

---

Notice concerning anti-dumping measures on imports of para-cresol originating in the People's Republic of China

(2006/C 296/06)

By its judgment of 13 July 2006 in case T-413/03, the Court of First Instance of the European Communities annulled Regulation (EC) No 1656/2003 (1) imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of para-cresol originating in the People's Republic of China, insofar as it concerns imports into the European Community manufactured by Shandong Reipu Biochemicals Co. Ltd (2).

1

2

Consequently, the definitive anti-dumping duties paid pursuant to the above-mentioned regulation on imports into the European Community of para-cresol falling within CN code ex 2907 12 00 manufactured by the above-mentioned company (under TARIC additional code A435), including provisional duties definitively collected in accordance with Article 2 of the regulation, should be reimbursed. The reimbursement should be requested from national customs authorities in accordance with the applicable Community customs legislation.

As a consequence of the judgment of 13 July 2006, the above-mentioned company is no longer subject to the anti-dumping measures imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1656/2003 of 11 September 2003.

---

(1)  OJ L 234, 20.9.2003, p. 1.

1

(2)  The company is listed in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1656/2003 under the name ‘Shandong Reipu Chemicals Co. Ltd’.

2

---