alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   Exhibit 11.1

                          LaSalle Re Holdings Limited
            STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE

    (Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars except for number of 
                        shares and earnings per share)

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                         Quarter                      Six months
                                                         -------                      ----------

                                                                  Fully                         Fully
                                                  Primary        Diluted       Primary         Diluted
                                                  -------        -------       -------         -------
<S>                                         <C>                <C>            <C>            <C> 

Net income before minority interest:        (1)      31,332         31,332         60,732         60,732
                                                ===========    ===========    ===========    ===========
Number of shares:

Weighted average shares outstanding              14,397,720     14,397,720     14,397,720     14,397,720
Exchangeable non-voting Shares              (1)   8,329,290      8,329,290      8,329,290      8,329,290
Incremental shares of outstanding stock
options                                     (2)   1,204,829      1,204,829      1,089,672      1,163,434
Incremental shares of outstanding stock
appreciation rights                         (3)      39,245         39,245         39,245         39,245
                                                -----------    -----------    -----------    -----------
                                                 23,971,084     23,971,084     23,855,927     23,929,689
                                                ===========    ===========    ===========    ===========

Earnings per Share:                                    1.31           1.31           2.55           2.54  
</TABLE> 

(1) The holders of exchangeable non-voting Shares in LaSalle Re Limited, which
    represents the minority interest, generally can exchange these shares at
    any time, on a one for one basis, for common shares in LaSalle Re Holdings
    Limited.  For purposes of the computation of net income per common share,
    these shares have been treated as common share equivalents.

(2) As of March 31, 1996, the Company had 2,499,348 options outstanding.  The
    dilution would be the equivalent of approximately 1,204,829 shares for the 
    quarter and 1,089,672 for the six months ended March 31, 1996, using the 
    treasury stock method, based on market price.

(3) As of March 31, 1996, the Company had granted 340,872 stock appreciation 
    rights.  The dilution would be the equivalent of approximately 39,245
    shares for both the quarter and six months ended March 31, 1996, using the
    treasury stock method, based on market price.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1940 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to provide for a new rule regarding 

the application of the Act to marihuana, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 22, 2015 

Mr. ROHRABACHER (for himself, Mr. COHEN, Mr. HUNTER, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. YOUNG of Alaska, Ms. TITUS, Mr. MCCLINTOCK, Ms. 

SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. MASSIE, Mr. POLIS, Mr. AMASH, and Mr. POCAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to provide for a 

new rule regarding the application of the Act to marihuana, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Respect State Mari5 juana Laws Act of 2015’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1940 IH

1 SEC. 2. RULE REGARDING APPLICATION TO MARIHUANA. 

2 Part G of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 

3 801 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘SEC. 710. RULE REGARDING APPLICATION TO MARI6 HUANA. 

7 ‘‘Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the pro8 visions of this subchapter related to marihuana shall not 

9 apply to any person acting in compliance with State laws 

10 relating to the production, possession, distribution, dis11 pensation, administration, or delivery of marihuana.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Ave Reservoir Elevation                    
csv

      Secondary Reservoir Elevation                    
csv

      Pool Elevation                    
csv

#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Ave Reservoir Elevation                    
json

      Secondary Reservoir Elevation                    
json

      Pool Elevation                    
json
Exhibit 32.2 - Certification of Principal Financial Officer



CERTIFICATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Internet America, Inc. (the Company) for the period
ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sandra T. Everett, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Sandra T. Everett

Sandra T. Everett

Controller and Chief Accounting Officer

Date: November 15, 2004
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

STEPHEN PALMER,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 515 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 6th day of March, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-15-00345-CV

Norma Alicia Martinez Araujo

v.

Manuel Araujo

On appeal from the

332nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. F-4611-13-F

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

September 1, 2016
COCHITI LAKELatitude: 35.628Longitude: -106.317Elevation: 5356

COCHITI LAKE

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Ute Creek Site Page...



Ute Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Grayback Site Page...



Grayback

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Tres Ritos Site Page...



Tres Ritos

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Taos Powderhorn Site Page...



Taos Powderhorn

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Shuree Site Page...



Shuree

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Palo Site Page...



Palo

Courtesy NRCS - Go to San Antonio Sink Site Page...



San Antonio Sink

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Garita Peak Site Page...



Garita Peak

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Wager Gulch Site Page...



Wager Gulch

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Rio Santa Barbara Site Page...



Rio Santa Barbara

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Taos Pueblo Site Page...



Taos Pueblo

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Alcalde Site Page...



Alcalde

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Bateman Site Page...



Bateman

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Beartown Site Page...



Beartown

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Chamita Site Page...



Chamita

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Culebra #2 Site Page...



Culebra #2

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Cumbres Trestle Site Page...



Cumbres Trestle

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Gallegos Peak Site Page...



Gallegos Peak

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Hopewell Site Page...



Hopewell

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Lily Pond Site Page...



Lily Pond

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Middle Creek Site Page...



Middle Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to North Costilla Site Page...



North Costilla

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Quemazon Site Page...



Quemazon

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Red River Pass #2 Site Page...



Red River Pass #2

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Trinchera Site Page...



Trinchera

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Upper Rio Grande Site Page...



Upper Rio Grande

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Upper San Juan Site Page...



Upper San Juan

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Whiskey Ck Site Page...



Whiskey Ck

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Wolf Creek Summit Site Page...



Wolf Creek Summit

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Elk Cabin Site Page...



Elk Cabin

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Santa Fe Site Page...



Santa Fe
EXHIBIT 32

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the foregoing Report
on Form 10-QSB pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed filed pursuant to any provision of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or any other securities
law.

Each of the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78) and that the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Broadway Financial Corporation as of
and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007.



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  |                                                                      
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  |  | 
|Date: August 10, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Paul C. Hudson
|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  | Paul C. Hudson Chief Executive Officer Broadway Financial Corporation



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  |                                                                      
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  |  | 
|Date: August 10, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Samuel Sarpong
|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  | Samuel Sarpong Chief Financial Officer Broadway Financial Corporation
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No.’s 333-116649, 333-115743, 333-106688, 333-86567, 333-86513 and 333-59803) pertaining to the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan, 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and 2004 Stock Incentive Plan ofDocument Sciences Corporation of our report dated March 16, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Document Sciences Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,2006. 

/s/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

San Diego, California 

March 16, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
(UNAUDITED) AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           5,658
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   66,417<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     47,224
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               122,599
<PP&E>                                         399,792
<DEPRECIATION>                                 140,181
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 472,897
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           74,307
<BONDS>                                        198,274<F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,482
<OTHER-SE>                                     152,869
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   472,897
<SALES>                                        443,118
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               443,118
<CGS>                                          309,010
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  309,010
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,506
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 71,906
<INCOME-TAX>                                    27,966
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             43,644
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    43,644
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.72
<FN>
<F1>ARE PRESENTED NET OF THE ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS.
<F2>REPRESENT REVOLVING CREDIT LOANS AND LONG-TERM DEBT, LESS CURRENT MATURITIES.
</FN>


</TABLE>
CUCHARAS RESERVOIRLatitude: 37.748Longitude: -104.611Elevation: None

CUCHARAS RESERVOIR

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Apishapa Site Page...



Apishapa

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Culebra #2 Site Page...



Culebra #2

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Trinchera Site Page...



Trinchera

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Whiskey Ck Site Page...



Whiskey Ck
# L_2009310DE.01004701.xml

| 25.11.2009 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 310/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2009

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 310/47

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 872/2009 der Kommission vom 18. September 2009 zur Einreihung von bestimmten Waren in die Kombinierte Nomenklatur

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 249 vom 23. September 2009
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 249 vom 23. September 2009

Seite 5, Anhang, dritte Spalte, erster Absatz:

anstatt:

„Außerdem weisen die Spinnstoffe (T1 und T2 und T3 zusammen) die Merkmale eines Oberteils im Sinne der Anmerkung 1 zu Kapitel 64 auf, da das Spinnstoffmaterial des Oberteils der Sandale ohne die anderen Materialien die Funktion eines Oberteils erfüllt, das heißt, das es dem Fuß genügend Halt gibt, um dem Benutzer der Sandale das Laufen zu ermöglichen (siehe Urteil des Gerichtshofs der Europäischen Gemeinschaften in der Rechtssache C-165/07, Skatteministeriet gegen Ecco Sko A/S, Randnr. 48).“

muss es heißen:

„Außerdem weisen die Spinnstoffe (T1 und T2 und T3 zusammen) die Merkmale eines Oberteils im Sinne der Zusätzlichen Anmerkung 1 zu Kapitel 64 auf, da das Spinnstoffmaterial des Oberteils der Sandale ohne die anderen Materialien die Funktion eines Oberteils erfüllt, das heißt, das es dem Fuß genügend Halt gibt, um dem Benutzer der Sandale das Laufen zu ermöglichen (siehe Urteil des Gerichtshofs der Europäischen Gemeinschaften in der Rechtssache C-165/07, Skatteministeriet gegen Ecco Sko A/S, Randnr. 48).“

---
# C_2021210EN.01001001.xml

| 3.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 210/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 210/10

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10097 – AMD/Xilinx)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 210/04)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (‘AMD’, United States), |
| --- | --- |

—

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (‘AMD’, United States),

| — | Xilinx, Inc. (‘Xilinx’, United States). |
| --- | --- |

—

Xilinx, Inc. (‘Xilinx’, United States).

AMD acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Xilinx.

The concentration is accomplished by way of a merger between Throne Merger Sub, Inc., an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of AMD, and Xilinx. Xilinx will survive the merger as a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of AMD.

2.

| — | for AMD: AMD is a publicly listed global semiconductor company. AMD is active primarily in the supply of central processing units (‘CPUs’), based on the x86 instruction set, and graphics processing units (‘GPUs’); |
| --- | --- |

—

for AMD: AMD is a publicly listed global semiconductor company. AMD is active primarily in the supply of central processing units (‘CPUs’), based on the x86 instruction set, and graphics processing units (‘GPUs’);

| — | for Xilinx: Xilinx is a publicly listed global semiconductor company. Xilinx is active in the supply of field programmable gate arrays (‘FPGAs’), a chip that customers can program after fabrication to perform desired logic functions. |
| --- | --- |

—

for Xilinx: Xilinx is a publicly listed global semiconductor company. Xilinx is active in the supply of field programmable gate arrays (‘FPGAs’), a chip that customers can program after fabrication to perform desired logic functions.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10097 – AMD/Xilinx

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
#### Stern *et al. v.*Meikleham.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, Third Department.*

May 26, 1890.)

Infancy—Voidable Contract.

A purchase of goods by an infant for the purposes of his business, not being clearly to his disadvantage, is not void, hut only voidable.

Appeal from Albany county court.

The defendant, an infant, carried on for three years a store in Cohoes, for the sale of hats and caps. In .Tune, 1883, he purchased hats and caps of the plaintiffs, amounting, at the agreed price, to $194.25, and placed them with his stock in his store. He did not pay the plaintiffs. In December, 1883, be made a general assignment of his stock in trade, including a considerable portion of the hats and caps bought of the plaintiffs, for the benefft of creditors. The plaintiffs commenced this action before a justice of the peace, and, alleging fraud, procured an attachment, and levied upon the stock. The defendant appeared by guardian upon the trial, and alleged and proveí? his infancy. *217The plaintiffs recovered, and this appeal is from an affirmance of the judgment by the county court.

Argued before Learned, P. J., and Landon and Mayham, JJ.

*Henry A. Strong,*for appellant. *Boyle & Fitts,*for respondents.

Landon, J.

This action was prematurely brought. The contract was not for necessaries, and therefore was not obligator)'. It was not clearly to the disadvantage of the infant, and therefore was not void. It was of an uncertain nature as to benefit or prejudice, and therefore was voidable. 2 Kent, Comm. 236; *Chapin*v. *Shafer,*49 N. Y. 407; *Henry*v. *Root,*33 N. Y. 526; *Sparman*v. *Keim,*83 N. Y. 245. But, while the defendant’s infancy continued, he was incapable of affirming or disaffirming it. He has bis election after becoming of age. *Beardsley*v. *Hotchkiss,*96 N. Y. 201, 211; *Walsh*v. *Powers,*43 N. Y. 23, and eases *supra.*The defendant was still an infant when this action was tried. J udgment reversed, with costs. All concur.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-18-00180-CR

HARRY C. WASHINGTON APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 297TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 1458141D

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

On April 27, 2018, we notified Appellant Harry C. Washington of our 

concern that we lacked jurisdiction over this appeal because he was attempting 

to appeal from a judgment of acquittal.2 We generally have jurisdiction to 

 1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

2Appellant’s companion case in cause number 02-18-00181-CR remains 

pending because that appeal is from a judgment of conviction.
2

consider an appeal in a criminal case only when there has been a final judgment 

of conviction. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 44.02 (West 2018); McKown 

v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1996, no pet.).

We informed Appellant that his appeal would be dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction unless he or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed with this 

court, on or before May 7, 2018, a response showing grounds for continuing the 

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f), 44.3. No response has been filed. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

/s/ Bonnie Sudderth

BONNIE SUDDERTH

CHIEF JUSTICE

PANEL: SUDDERTH, C.J.; WALKER and MEIER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: June 7, 2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

490 

KA 09-00205 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WAYNE M. JOHNSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

(APPEAL NO. 2.) 

 

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (JANET C. SOMES OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (ERIN TUBBS OF COUNSEL),

FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (John J.

Connell, J.), rendered June 27, 2008. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree and

robbery in the third degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Same Memorandum as in People v Johnson ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d 

___ [Apr. 26, 2013]).

Entered: April 26, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court