alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2009330EN.01006801.xml

| 16.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 330/68 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 330/68

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 1232/2009

of 15 December 2009

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Wiśnia nadwiślanka (PDO)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Poland’s application to register the name ‘Wiśnia nadwiślanka’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Poland’s application to register the name ‘Wiśnia nadwiślanka’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 December 2009.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 104, 6.5.2009, p. 21.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

POLAND

Wiśnia nadwiślanka (PDO)

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gregory Hale, Appellant.

Memorandum: Defendant failed to request the court to instruct the jury regarding his alibi defense and made no objection to the charge as given. Although an alibi instruction was warranted, this error, together with claimed improprieties in the prosecutor’s summation, was not preserved for our review (CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Williams,*46 NY2d 1070, 1071; *People v Cobenais,*112 AD2d 31) and reversal in the interest of justice is not warranted (CPL 470.15 [3]; *People v Hopkins,*58 NY2d 1079, 1083; *People v Cobenais, supra).*

We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find that they lack merit. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Marshall, J. — robbery, third degree.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Green, Balio, Lawton and Schnepp, JJ.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-50880

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

EMANUEL DE JESUS GUERRA-FLORES

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:07-CR-915-ALL

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Emanuel De Jesus GuerraFlores raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United

States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a

penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. PinedaArrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 872 (2008).

The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 18, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
EXHIBIT 31.1

   CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, James S. Osterman, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Blount International,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

     (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

     (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financing reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors:

     (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.

Date:  July 13, 2004

/s/ James S. Osterman
----------------------
James S. Osterman
President and Chief Executive Officer
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?

IMMC.COM%282021%29300%20final.ENG.xhtml.1\_EN\_ACT\_part1\_v3.docx


![european flag](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/image/eclogo.jpg)EUROPEAN COMMISSION

Brussels, 9.7.2021

COM(2021) 300 final

2021/0227(BUD)

DRAFT General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2022

- General Introduction


- Total expenditure


- General statement of revenue


- Statement of revenue and expenditure by section

DOCUMENTS

| |
| --- |
| |

DRAFT

General budget of

the European Union

for the financial year 2022

—
   General introduction

—
   Total expenditure

—
   General statement of revenue

—
   Statement of revenue and expenditure by section:

   —
   Section 1: European Parliament

—
   Section 2: European Council and Council

 
   —
   Section 3: European Commission

—
   Section 4: Court of Justice of the European Union

 
   —
   Section 5: Court of Auditors

—
   Section 6: European Economic and Social Committee

 
   —
   Section 7: Committee of the Regions

—
   Section 8: European Ombudsman

—
   Section 9: European Data Protection Supervisor

 
   —
   Section 10: European External Action Service

<https://eur-lex.europa.eu/budget/www/index-en.htm>

| |
| --- |
| |
EXHIBIT
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION**


**OF**


**CHIEF
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Manhattan
      Pharmaceuticals, Inc. do hereby certify that, to the best of their
      knowledge:




(a)  the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Manhattan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. for the
      quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and




(b)  information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of Manhattan Pharmaceuticals,
      Inc.




Dated:
                September 3, 2008
            /s/ Douglas AbelDouglas
                AbelPresident
                and Chief Executive OfficerDated:
                September 3, 2008
            /s/
                Michael G. McGuinnessMichael
                G. McGuinnessChief
                Operating and Financial Officer
#### FAIRCHILD et al. v. EDSON.

(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.

May 18, 1894.)

Action by Charles S. Fairchild and others against Margaret B. Edson, impleaded.

Argued before VAN BRUNT, P. J., and FOLLETT and PARKER. JJ.

No opinion. Motion for resettlement denied. See 28 N. Y. Supp. 402.
# L_2010252EN.01017701.xml

| 25.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 252/177 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 252/177

---

DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

of 5 May 2010

on the closure of the accounts of the European Network and Information Security Agency for the financial year 2008

(2010/533/EU)

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,

having regard to the final annual accounts of the European Network and Information Security Agency for the financial year 2008,

having regard to the Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of the European Network and Information Security Agency for the financial year 2008, together with the Agency’s replies (1),

having regard to the Council’s recommendation of 16 February 2010 (5827/2010 — C7-0061/2010),

having regard to Article 276 of the EC Treaty and Article 319 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (2), and in particular Article 185 thereof,

having regard to Regulation (EC) No 460/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2004 establishing the European Network and Information Security Agency (3), and in particular Article 17 thereof,

having regard to Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 of 19 November 2002 on the framework Financial Regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 185 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 (4), and in particular Article 94 thereof,

having regard to Rule 77 of, and Annex VI to, its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A7-0087/2010),

| 1. | Approves the closure of the accounts of the European Network and Information Security Agency for the financial year 2008; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward this Decision to the Executive Director of the European Network and Information Security Agency, the Council, the Commission and the Court of Auditors, and to arrange for its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union (L series). |
| --- | --- |

2.

The President

Jerzy BUZEK

The Secretary-General

Klaus WELLE

---

(1)  
  OJ C 304, 15.12.2009, p. 16.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 77, 13.3.2004, p. 1.

3

(4)  
  OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p. 72.

4

---
Exhibit 32a
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Murray United Development Corp.
on Form 10-KSB for the period ending July 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Dwight Foster, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date:  October 29, 2003                       / s /  Dwight Foster
                                              -----------------------
                                              DWIGHT FOSTER,
                                              Chief Executive Officer
datetime,flow volume2015-05-20,1271.40496
NO. 07-07-0344-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL C

	JULY 23, 2008

			______________________________

	JAY GLEN COMEGYS, APPELLANT

	V.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 251ST DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;

	NO. 17121-C; HONORABLE ANA ESTEVEZ, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	Appellant, Jay Glen Comegys, appeals his conviction for the offense of aggravated sexual assault of a child and sentence of confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, for 75 years and fine of $10,000.  We affirm.

	Appellant’s attorney has filed an Anders brief and a motion to withdraw.  Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed. 2d 498 (1967).  In support of his motion to withdraw, counsel certifies that he has diligently reviewed the record and, in his opinion, the record reflects no reversible error upon which an appeal can be predicated.  Id. at 744- 45.  In compliance with High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 813 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978), counsel has candidly discussed why, under the controlling authorities, there is no error in the trial court’s judgment.  Additionally, counsel has certified that he has provided appellant a copy of the Anders brief and motion to withdraw and appropriately advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response in this matter.  Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991).  The court has also advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response.  Although, appellant requested and was granted an extension of time to file a pro se response, appellant has not filed a response.

	By his Anders brief, counsel raises grounds that could possibly support an appeal, but concludes the appeal is frivolous.  We have reviewed these grounds and made an independent review of the entire record to determine whether there are any arguable grounds which might support an appeal.  See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988); Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex.Crim.App. 2005).  We have found no such arguable grounds and agree with counsel that the appeal is frivolous.

	Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is hereby granted and the trial court’s judgment is affirmed.1

		Mackey K. Hancock

							         Justice 

Do not publish.
**EXHIBIT 12.2**
I, David Zigdon, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Radcom Ltd.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company asof, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the company, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the period coveredby the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to thecompany’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
Date: May 5, 2004     /s/ David Zigdon   David Zigdon Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
**Exhibit 23.02**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-77682, 33-53726, 333-02948, 333-57965, 333-37168, 333-106062and 333-106064 of Caraustar Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) on Form S-8, 333-66943 and 333-65555 of the Company on Form S-3, and 333-31618 of the Company on Form S-4 of our report dated March 11, 2004, relating to theconsolidated financial statements of the Company as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to the adoption ofStatement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, which was adopted by the Company as of January 1, 2003, and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill andOther Intangible Assets, which was adopted by the Company as of January 1, 2002), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company. 

 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

 

Atlanta, Georgia 

January 14, 2005
#### Starkey *v.*The State.

Appeal from Hale Circuit Court.

Tried 'before tbe Hon. John Moore..

J. T. Collins, for appellant.

Chas. G. Brown, Attorney-General, for tbe State.

Tbe appellant was indicted, tried and convicted for grand larceny.

Judgment affirmed.

Opinion by

Haralson, J.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2166 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2166

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
   exclusion from gross income of discharges of qualified principal 
                        residence indebtedness.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 30, 2015

 Mr. Grayson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
   exclusion from gross income of discharges of qualified principal 
                        residence indebtedness.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME OF DISCHARGE OF 
              QUALIFIED PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE INDEBTEDNESS.

    Subparagraph (E) of section 108(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 is amended by striking ``which is discharged before January 1, 
2015''.
                                 <all>
```
LRS - CLEAR LAKE DAMLatitude: 41.926Longitude: -121.075Elevation: None

LRS - Clear Lake Dam

Courtesy NRCS - Go to State Line Site Page...



State Line

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Strawberry Site Page...



Strawberry

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Gerber Reservoir Site Page...



Gerber Reservoir

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Crowder Flat Site Page...



Crowder Flat
# L_2010060DE.01004701.xml

| 10.3.2010 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 60/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2010

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 60/47

---

Berichtigung des Durchführungsbeschlusses 2010/99/EU des Rates vom 16. Februar 2010 zur Ermächtigung der Republik Litauen, eine von Artikel 193 der Richtlinie 2006/112/EG über das gemeinsame Mehrwertsteuersystem abweichende Regelung zu verlängern

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 45 vom 20. Februar 2010
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 45 vom 20. Februar 2010

Seite 10:

anstatt:

„DER EUROPÄISCHE RAT — “

muss es heißen:

„DER RAT DER EUROPÄISCHEN UNION — “

---
# C_2021089EN.01000301.xml

| 16.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10111 — CVC/Vivartia Holdings)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 89/03)

On 8 March 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10111. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10111. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---