alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 32009M5690 - EN

*|*

# 32009M5690

**Commission Decision of 11/12/2009 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No COMP/M.5690 - OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION / PHIBRO) according to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*
Official Journal 0305 , 16/12/2009 P. 0006 - 0006 *

|EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels, 11.12.2009

SG-Greffe(2009) D/ 11168

C(2009) 10248

PUBLIC VERSION

MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

To the notifying party:

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M.5690 - OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION/ PHIBRO Notification of 13/11/2009 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 281 of 21/11/2009, page 54.

1. On 13/11/2009, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 by which Occidental Petroleum Corporation ("Occidental", USA) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of Phibro LLC ("Phibro", USA) belonging to Citigroup by way of purchase of shares.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for Occidental: oil and gas exploration and production; manufacturing and sale of certain chemicals;

- for Phibro: trading in oil, gas, metals, commodities and commodities derivatives.

3. After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 and of paragraph 5 (c) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [2] .

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004.

For the Commission (signed) Philip LOWE Director General

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

[2] OJ C 56, 05.3.2005, p. 32.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northwest Pipe Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brian W. Dunham, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/ BRIAN W. DUNHAM                  
|Brian W. Dunham                      
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|November 7, 2007
IB 

House Calendar No. 25 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 172 

[Report No. 114–89] 

To designate the United States courthouse located at 501 East Court Street 

in Jackson, Mississippi, as the ‘‘R. Jess Brown United States Courthouse’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2015 

Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

APRIL 23, 2015 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 172 RH

A BILL 

To designate the United States courthouse located at 501 

East Court Street in Jackson, Mississippi, as the ‘‘R. 

Jess Brown United States Courthouse’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 172 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The United States courthouse located at 501 East 

5 Court Street in Jackson, Mississippi, shall be known and 

6 designated as the ‘‘R. Jess Brown United States Court7 house’’. 

8 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

9 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

10 paper, or other record of the United States to the United 

11 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed 

12 to be a reference to the ‘‘R. Jess Brown United States 

13 Courthouse’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 25 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 172 

[Report No. 114–89] 

A BILL 

To designate the United States courthouse located 

house’’. as the ‘‘R. Jess Brown United States Courtat 501 East Court Street in Jackson, Mississippi, 

APRIL 23, 2015 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001018757
<NAME> CEL GOLF GROUP, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 22

- 00041

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF O.L.S. , a Child

From the 73rd Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021

- PA

- 00361

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor , Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE RIOS , AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED. No costs are assessed against appellants because they are indigent.

SIGNED June 29, 2022.

_____________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
# C_2021439EN.01000401.xml

| 29.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 439/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 439/4

---

Special report No 24/2021

Performance-based financing in Cohesion policy: worthy ambitions, but obstacles remained in the 2014-2020 period

(2021/C 439/04)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that special report No 24/2021 ‘Performance-based financing in Cohesion policy: worthy ambitions, but obstacles remained in the 2014-2020 period’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu

---
# C_2021367EN.01000401.xml

| 13.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 367/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 367/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10394 – Platinum Equity Group/Solenis)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 367/04)

On 7 September 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10394. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10394. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
----

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the annual report of Silver Dragon Resources Inc. (the"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Marc Hazout, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: July 9, 2007 

By: /s/ Marc Hazout                  

> 
Marc Hazout  President and Chief Executive Officer

----
(18 Misc. Rep. 506.)

#### COOK v. THURSTON.

(Supreme Court, Special Term, Onondaga County.

November, 1896.)

Judgment—Action on—Leave of Court.

Leave of court to sue is jurisdictional to an action on a judgment between the original parties thereto, under Code Civ. Proc. § 1913, providing that such an action cannot be sustained unless the court has previously granted leave to bring it; and therefore a motion for leave nunc pro tunc, made after an action to brought, will be denied.

Action by Alfred G. Cook against Alonzo Thurston on a judgment recovered in an action between the same parties. Plaintiff moves-for an order nunc pro tunc as of a date before the commencement of the action, granting him leave to bring it.

Denied.

Joseph D. Senn, tor the motion.

Joseph Beal, opposed.

WRIGHT, J.

This motion having been made prior to the date when the amendment of 1896 to section 1913 of the Code of Civil Procedure took effect, it must be decided under that, section as it read prior to that amendment. Under section 71 of the Code of Procedure as it stood in 1871, a conflict of authority existed on the question whether commencing the action without leave was merely an irregularity, curable by an order granted nunc pro tunc, as held in Church v. Van Buren, 55 How. Prac. 489; or whether granting, leave was a jurisdictional prerequisite, as held subsequently to the-above-cited case in Farish v. Austin, 25 Hun, 430, wherein the court says, on page 433: “The authority to sue was at the very basis of the right to sue.” Said section 71 provided: “No action shall be brought * * * without leave of the court for good cause shown, on notice to the adverse party.” Since those decisions were made said section 71 has been superseded by section 1913 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which provides that such action cannot be brought unless “the court * * * has previously made an order granting leave to bring it.” The requirement here made that the order shall be previously granted approves , the doctrine laid down-in Farish v. Austin, supra, and settles the question.

Motion denied, with ¡§10 costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          13,863
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,760
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,838
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,461
<PP&E>                                         158,871
<DEPRECIATION>                                  97,789
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 111,749
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          261,898
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,611
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,884,207
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   111,749
<SALES>                                         46,427
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,835
<CGS>                                           38,272
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,272
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               252,511
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,855
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (257,803)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (258,603)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (258,603)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (0.016)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.016)


</TABLE>
LOST CREEK RESERVOIRLatitude: 41.183Longitude: -111.399Elevation: 5917

LOST CREEK RESERVOIR

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Lost Creek Resv Site Page...



Lost Creek Resv

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Kilfoil Creek Site Page...



Kilfoil Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Chicken Ridge Site Page...



Chicken Ridge

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Horse Ridge Site Page...



Horse Ridge
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of American Entertainment and Animation Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of his knowledge, that: 

1.     The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003 (the "Form 10-KSB") of the Company complies in all material respects with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.     The information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  

 

/s/ Marc Hazout

Marc Hazout, Chief Executive Officer

Date: April 14, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2204 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2204

 To clarify the authority of States and political subdivisions thereof 
to regulate liquefied petroleum gas rail transload facilities that are 
          owned or operated by or on behalf of a rail carrier.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 1, 2015

 Mr. McGovern introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To clarify the authority of States and political subdivisions thereof 
to regulate liquefied petroleum gas rail transload facilities that are 
          owned or operated by or on behalf of a rail carrier.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safe Communities Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. JURISDICTION OF THE SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD.

    Section 10501(c) of title 49, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) and (B) as 
                subparagraphs (B) and (C), respectively; and
                    (B) by inserting before subparagraph (B), as so 
                redesignated, the following new subparagraph:
            ``(A) the term `liquefied petroleum gas rail transload 
        facility' means the portion of a facility owned or operated by 
        or on behalf of a rail carrier where liquefied petroleum gas, 
        as a commodity to be transported for a charge, is collected, 
        stored, separated, processed, treated, managed, disposed of, or 
        transferred, but such term does not include activities taking 
        place at such portion that are comprised solely of the railroad 
        transportation of liquefied petroleum gas after the liquefied 
        petroleum gas is loaded for shipment on or in a rail car, 
        including railroad transportation for the purpose of 
        interchanging railroad cars containing liquefied petroleum 
        gas;''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2)--
                    (A) by striking ``or'' at the end of subparagraph 
                (A);
                    (B) by striking the period at the end of 
                subparagraph (B) and inserting ``; or''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following new 
                subparagraph:
            ``(C) a liquefied petroleum gas rail transload facility.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by section 2 shall be effective as of July 1, 
2013.
                                 <all>
```
Skip to main content

Privacy Policy•Site map

# Employee Rights and How to Report Wrongful Conduct

Employment Dispute Resolution ("EDR") Plan for the United States Court of Federal Claims

**EDR Coordinators**

Meg Beardsley, Staff Attorney, United States Court of Federal ClaimsMeg_Beardsley@cfc.uscourts.gov

Taryn Fry, Staff Attorney, United States Court of Federal ClaimsTaryn_Fry@cfc.uscourts.gov

**Judicial Integrity Officer**

Michael Henry, AO Office of Judicial IntegrityAO_OJI@ao.uscourts.gov

Rules for Judicial-Conduct and Judicial-Disability Proceedings

Howard T. Markey National Courts Building • 717 Madison Place, NW, Washington, DC 20439 • 202-357-6400
USDC Oregon Case 3:16-CR-00051-BR

Declaration in Support of Motion to Withdraw and Allow Self-representation 1

Tiffany A. Harris OSB 02318

Attorney at Law

811 SW Naito Pkwy, Suite 500

Portland, Oregon 97204

t. 971.634.1818 f. 503.721.9050

tiff@harrisdefense.com

Attorney for Shawna Cox

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

PORTLAND DIVISION

 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

 

 SHAWNA COX.

Defendant.

3:16-CR-00051-BR-07

DECLARATION IN SUPPORT 

OF MOTION TO WITHDRAW 

AND ALLOW SELFREPRESENTATION

 

1. I was appointed to represent Ms. Cox pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act, 18 

U.S.C. § 3006A(e)(2) and have been her counsel of record since January 29, 2016.

2. Ms. Cox is charged with Conspiracy to Impede Federal Officers under 18 U.S.C.

§ 372 and Possession of Firearm in a Federal Facility under 18 U.S.C. § 930. 

3. Ms. Cox has weighed the potential dangers and benefits of self-representation. 

She requests that I withdraw as attorney of record and asserts her Sixth Amendment right to 

represent herself. She asks that the Court hold the required hearing under Faretta v. California

and make a finding that she has knowingly and intelligently waived her right to court appointed

counsel.

///

///

///

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 871 Filed 07/12/16 Page 1 of 2
USDC Oregon Case 3:16-CR-00051-BR

Declaration in Support of Motion to Withdraw and Allow Self-representation 2

4. If the Court makes the requisite findings and my motion to withdraw is granted,

Ms. Cox asks that the Court appoint me as standby counsel.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the forgoing is correct to the best of my knowledge 

and belief. 

DATED this 12th day of July, 2016.

Respectfully submitted,

/S/ Tiffany Harris

Tiffany A. Harris 

Attorney for Defendant Shawna Cox

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 871 Filed 07/12/16 Page 2 of 2
Motion Granted; Memorandum Opinion filed September 26, 2023.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-23-00036-CV

2016 BAYTOWN WARD ROAD, LLC AND EUREKA MULTIFAMILY 

GROUP, LP, Appellants

V.

APRIL LAWSON, Appellee

On Appeal from the 127th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2020-83979

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a judgment signed October 17, 2022. On September 

14, 2023, the parties filed an agreed motion indicating, “The Parties have agreed to 

resolve this case and hereby jointly request that the Court of Appeals dispose of 

this appeal in accordance with Rule 42.1(a)(2)(B). See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.1(a)(2)(B). The motion is granted. 

Accordingly, we set aside the trial court’s judgment against appellants, 2016 
2

Baytown Ward Road, LLC and Eureka Multifamily Group L.P., signed October 

17, 2022, and we remand the cause to the trial court for rendition of judgment in 

accordance with the parties’ agreement.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Zimmerer, and Poissant.
Skip to main content

Privacy Policy•Site map

# Vaccine Petitions - Electronic Service on Secretary of Health and Human Services

Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-11(a)(1), all vaccine petitions must be served on the Secretary of Health and Human Services. To electronically serve a copy of your petition, please visit https://www.hrsa.gov/vaccine-compensation/index.html.

Howard T. Markey National Courts Building • 717 Madison Place, NW, Washington, DC 20439 • 202-357-6400