alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATIION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED APRIL 30, 1997
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                           6,374
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  227,148
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         122,514
<DEPRECIATION>                                  85,226
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,075,301
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,349
<OTHER-SE>                                     180,411
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,075,301
<SALES>                                        868,464
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               868,464
<CGS>                                          388,450
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,009,201
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,592
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (143,329)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (143,329)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (143,329)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 23 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT The Board of Directors
The viaLink Company: We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(No. 333-55912) on Form S-3, (No. 333-41320) on Form S-8 and
(No. 333-101523) on Form S-2 of The viaLink
Company of our report dated March 5, 2004, relating to the consolidated balance
sheets of The viaLink Company as of December 31, 2002 and 2003, and the related
statements of operations, stockholders equity (deficit) and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003, which
report appears in the December 31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-KSB of The
viaLink Company. Our report dated March 5, 2004, contains an explanatory paragraph that states
that the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and is dependent
upon access to additional external financing, which raise substantial doubt
about its ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial
statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of
that uncertainty. KPMG LLP Dallas, Texas
March 25, 2004
[863 NE2d 588, 831 NYS2d 367]

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Terrien Williams, Appellant.

Argued January 4, 2007;

decided February 15, 2007

*855APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Legal Aid Bureau of Buffalo, Inc.,*Buffalo *(Karen C. Russo-McLaughlin, David C. Schopp*and *Barbara J. Davies*of counsel), for appellant.

*Frank J. Clark, District Attorney,*Buffalo *(Susan C. Ministero*and *J. Michael Marion*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant was charged in a five-count indictment with intentional murder in the second degree, felony murder, two counts of robbery in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree. The charges arose from an incident that took place on the night of August 31, 2001, when three assailants broke into the residence of Joy and Michael Johnson. In the course of the robbery one of the assailants shot Michael Johnson in the chest with a shotgun, and he died at the hospital a few hours later. At the station Joy Johnson told police that during the robbery, she looked up to see a man wearing a red bandana standing over her husband’s body with a shotgun still billowing smoke, and that she thought she could identify him if she saw him “up close.” Later that same day, Johnson saw defendant on a street corner, contacted police and identified defendant as the man holding the shotgun. She then picked him out of a photo array and, weeks later, out of two lineups.

 After a jury trial, defendant was convicted on all counts except intentional murder. He now claims that he was denied a fair trial due to the prosecutor’s denigration of witnesses, disparagement of defendant’s alibi and misrepresentations to the jurors. Defendant, however, failed to preserve his objection to the vast majority of these alleged instances of prosecutorial misconduct. Objections defense counsel did make were largely sustained by the court, with no request for further relief or for a mistrial; the court several times on its own advised the jury that lawyers’ remarks were “not evidence.” We agree with the Appellate Division that defendant was not deprived of due process or a fair trial. We similarly reject defendant’s alternative claim that he was denied effective assistance of counsel. Defense *856counsel registered numerous objections throughout the trial, conducted rigorous cross-examination, and, among other things, moved for both a mistrial and a new trial, albeit on grounds not relevant here. As the record reflects zealous if not consistent advocacy, this contention is without merit.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read and Smith concur; Judges Pigott and Jones taking no part.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.
# C_2021473EN.01001701.xml

| 24.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 473/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 473/17

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10280 – ABP/Slaney/Linden)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 473/03)

On 2 July 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10280. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10280. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
MEREDITH RESERVOIR (CONTENT)Latitude: 38.148Longitude: -103.747Elevation: None

MEREDITH RESERVOIR (CONTENT)
Exhibit 10.45

Univision Communications Inc.
1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 3050
Los Angeles, California 90067March 7, 2002

CONFIDENTIALGrupo Televisa S.A.
Av. Vasco de Quiroga No. 2000
Colonia Santa Fe
01210 Mexico, D.F.
Mexico
Attention: Mr. Jaime Davila

Re:

Acquisition of Fonovisa Music Group


Gentlemen:

We
refer to the letter agreement (the "Letter Agreement") dated December 19, 2001 (as amended), pursuant to which we have agreed to purchase and you have agreed to sell the
Fonovisa group of companies. In connection therewith, the parties hereby agree as follows:

(1)  To
extend the date for execution and delivery of the Long-form Agreement set forth in Section 5 of the Letter Agreement from March 8, 2002 to
March 22, 2002.

(2)  To
extend the date of the Closing to the tenth (10th) business day following the satisfaction of the conditions set forth in Section 4 of the Letter
Agreement.

Except
as amended hereby, the Letter Agreement remains in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.

You
acknowledge that our representatives have assisted your representatives in preparing the disclosure schedules related to the Letter Agreement. You further agree and acknowledge that
the preparation of such disclosure schedules and the information included thereon or omitted thereform are your sole responsibility.

If
the foregoing sets forth over mutual agreement and understanding, please execute below.

| |  | Very truly yours,            
| |  | -----------------------------
| |  | UNIVISION COMMUNICATIONS INC.
| |  |                              
| |  | By:                          
| |  | Name:                        
| |  | Title:                       

---

ACCEPTED, AGREED TO AND ACKNOWLEDGED
This 7th day of March, 2002

|GRUPO TELEVISA S.A. |  |                        |  |       
|------------------- |  | ---------------------- |  | ------
|By:                 |  | /s/JUAN MIJARES ORTEGA |  | By:   
|Name:               |  | Juan Mijares Ortega    |  | Name: 
|Title:              |  | Legal Representative   |  | Title:

---

QuickLinks
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paul GREEN, a.k.a. Ander P. Clark, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-13166

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

June 19, 2007.

Michael B. Cohen, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Anne R. Schultz, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before BLACK, MARCUS and COX, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Cohen, appointed counsel for Paul Green, a.k.a. Ander Clark, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Green’s conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                                NMT Medical, Inc.
                               27 Wormwood Street
                                Boston, MA 02210

                                 March 22, 2002

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Judiciary Plaza
Washington, DC  20549



     Re:  Confirmation of Arthur Andersen Representations



Ladies and Gentlemen:


     This letter confirms that NMT Medical, Inc. has received from Arthur
Andersen LLP ("Andersen"), the independent public accountant engaged by the
company to examine the company's financial statements that are included in the
Form 10-K to which this letter is filed as an exhibit, a representation letter
addressed to the company and stating that:

o    the audit for the year ended December 31, 2001 conducted by Andersen was
     subject to Andersen's quality control system for the U.S. accounting and
     auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that the engagement was
     conducted in compliance with professional standards; and

o    there was appropriate continuity of Andersen personnel working on the
     audit, availability of national office consultation and availability of
     personnel at foreign affiliates of Andersen to conduct the relevant
     portions of the audit.

                                              Very truly yours,



                                              NMT Medical, Inc.

                                              By: /s/ John E. Ahern
                                                  --------------------
                                              Name: John E. Ahern
                                              Title: President and
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
# C_2022099EN.01024001.xml

| 1.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 99/240 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 99/240

---

P9_TA(2021)0323

Interbus agreement: Protocol on international regular and special regular carriage of passengers by coach and bus ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 6 July 2021 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of a Protocol to the Agreement on the international occasional carriage of passengers by coach and bus (Interbus Agreement) regarding the international regular and special regular carriage of passengers by coach and bus (11441/2020 — C9-0027/2021 — 2020/0258(NLE))

(Consent)

(2022/C 99/32)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (11441/2020), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (11441/2020),

| — | having regard to the draft Protocol to the Agreement on the international occasional carriage of passengers by coach and bus (Interbus Agreement) regarding the international regular and special regular carriage of passengers by coach and bus (11442/2020), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Protocol to the Agreement on the international occasional carriage of passengers by coach and bus (Interbus Agreement) regarding the international regular and special regular carriage of passengers by coach and bus (11442/2020),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 91 and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C9-0027/2021), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 91 and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C9-0027/2021),

| — | having regard to Rule 105(1) and (4), and Rule 114(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 105(1) and (4), and Rule 114(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A9-0176/2021), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A9-0176/2021),

| 1. | Gives its consent to the conclusion of the Protocol; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

2.

---
Exhibit 24


[Moore Stephens Cooper Molyneux LLP Letterhead]

April 14, 2004

Mr. Robert Mottern
Weizenecker, Rose, Mottern and Fisher, P.C.
1800 Peachtree Street, Suite 620
Atlanta, GA 30309

Dear Mr. Mottern,

     Re:  American Entertainment and Animation Corporation
          December 31, 2003 Audited Financial Statements

We hereby provide our consent as independent accountants to the
incorporation of the above noted financial statements in the Company's
Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003.

Yours truly,
MOORE STEPHENS COOPER MOLYNEUX LLP

/s/ Sandy A. Solecki
    Sandy A. Solecki
# L_2009278EN.01002401.xml

| 23.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 278/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 278/24

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 999/2009

of 22 October 2009

granting no export refund for skimmed milk powder in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 619/2008

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1), and in particular Article 164(2), in conjunction with Article 4, thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 619/2008 of 27 June 2008 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds concerning certain milk products (2) provides for a standing invitation to tender procedure. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 619/2008 of 27 June 2008 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds concerning certain milk products (2) provides for a standing invitation to tender procedure.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 6 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1454/2007 of 10 December 2007 laying down common rules for establishing a tender procedure for fixing export refunds for certain agricultural products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate not to grant any refund for the tendering period ending on 20 October 2009. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 6 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1454/2007 of 10 December 2007 laying down common rules for establishing a tender procedure for fixing export refunds for certain agricultural products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate not to grant any refund for the tendering period ending on 20 October 2009.

| (3) | The Management Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its Chair, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Management Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its Chair,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the standing invitation to tender opened by Regulation (EC) No 619/2008, for the tendering period ending on 20 October 2009, no export refund shall be granted for the product and destinations referred to in point (c) of Article 1 and in Article 2 respectively of that Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 23 October 2009.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 October 2009.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 168, 28.6.2008, p. 20.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 325, 11.12.2007, p. 69.

3

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 23.1 CONSENT of INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM The Board of Directors
Prescient Applied Intelligence, Inc. f/k/a The viaLink Company: We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.333-55912) on Form S-3,
(No. 333-41320) on Form S-8 and (No.333-118735) on Form S-4 of Prescient Applied Intelligence,
Inc. f/k/a The viaLink Company of our report dated March 28, 2005, relating to the consolidated
balance sheets of Prescient Applied Intelligence as of December 31, 2003 and 2004, and the related
statements of operations, stockholders equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the years in
the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, which report appears in the December 31, 2004 annual
report on Form 10-KSB of Prescient Applied Intelligence. Our report dated March 28, 2005, contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the Company
has suffered recurring losses from operations and is dependent upon access to additional external
financing, which raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The
consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome
of that uncertainty. KPMG LLP Dallas, Texas
March 31, 2005
# L_2012054DE.01002202.xml

| 28.2.2012 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 54/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.2.2012

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 54/22

---

Berichtigung des Beschlusses der Europäischen Zentralbank vom 25. November 2010 zum Verfahren der Qualitätszulassung für Hersteller von Euro-Banknoten (EZB/2010/22)

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 330 vom 15. Dezember 2010
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 330 vom 15. Dezember 2010

Auf Seite 14, Artikel 1 Buchstabe h:

anstatt:

„ ‚Rohstoffe für Euro-Banknoten:‘ zur Herstellung von Euro-Banknoten verwendetes Papier, Tinte, Folie und Fasern,“

muss es heißen:

„ ‚Rohstoffe für Euro-Banknoten:‘ zur Herstellung von Euro-Banknoten verwendetes Papier, Farbe, Folie und Faden,“.

---
#### Townshend *v.*Loew *et al.*

*(Superior Court of New York City, General Term.*

July 8, 1890.)

Ejectment—-Title to Support—Powers in Trust.

C. conveyed mortgaged property to R., her heirs, etc., in trust to receive the income, and apply it to the use of O. for life, and after her death to convey the property to C.’s children and grandchildren. *Held*that, under 1 Rev. St. R. T. p. 729, § 59, providing that land to which a power in trust relates shall remain in or descend to the persons otherwise entitled, subject to the execution of the power, R.’s power to convey not having been exercised, the legal title to the land passed to the purchaser at the sale under the mortgage during C.’s life, and C.’s children and grandchildren, after her death, had no such title as would support an action of ejectment. Following *Townshend*v. *Frommer,*5 R. T. Supp. 442.

Exceptions from jury term.

Action in ejectment by John Townshend against Edward V. Loew and others. A verdict was directed for defendants, and plaintiff’s exceptions were ordered to be heard in the first instance at general term.

Argued before Truax and Ingraham:, JJ.

*John Townshend,*plaintiff, *in pro. per. John C. Shaw,*for defendants.

Per Curiam.

The exceptions taken by the plaintiff are overruled, and judgment is ordered for the defendants on the verdict, on the authority of *Townshend*v. *Frommer,*5 N. Y. Supp. 442, with costs.