alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Michael Thomas, Appellant, v Superintendent of Arthur Kill Correctional Facility, Respondent.

In the absence of a convincing demonstration to the contrary, it is presumed that the New York State Board of Parole acted properly in accordance with statutory requirements *(see, People ex rel. Herbert v New York State Bd. of Parole,*97 AD2d 128, 133, *appeal withdrawn*62 NY2d 617; *Matter of Mackall v New York State Bd. of Parole,*91 AD2d 1023, 1024, *lv denied*58 NY2d 609; *Matter of Abrams v New York State Bd. of Parole,*88 AD2d 951). Here, the petitioner failed to make a convincing showing that the Board relied upon incomplete and erroneous information in rendering its determination *(see, Matter of Rice v Hammock,*99 AD2d 644, *appeal withdrawn*62 NY2d 804; *Matter of Abrams v New York State*
      *849
      *Bd. of Parole, supra),*or that it failed to consider each of the factors enumerated by statute *(see,*Executive Law § 259-i [2] [c]) as it was required to do in making its parole release decision *(see, Matter of Davis v New York State Div. of Parole,*114 AD2d 412). Moreover, the Board’s written statement setting forth its reasons for denying parole, i.e, the "extraordinarily serious and bizarre nature of the present offenses”, was, on this record, sufficient *(see,*Executive Law § 259-i [2] [a]; *Matter of Harris v New York State Bd. of Parole,*114 AD2d 897; *Matter of Ristau v Hammock,*103 AD2d 944, *lv denied*63 NY2d 608; *People ex rel. Herbert v New York State Bd. of Parole, supra; People ex rel. Feliciano v Waters,*99 AD2d 850; *Matter of Bacon v Hammock,*96 AD2d 557), notwithstanding the petitioner’s exemplary institutional record and educational achievements and his lack of a criminal record, all of which was considered by the Board. Because it appears that the Board acted in accordance with statutory requirements, its discretionary release decision is not subject to judicial review *(see,*Executive Law § 259-i [5]; *Matter of Davis v New York State Div. of Parole, supra; Matter of Harden v New York State Bd. of Parole,*103 AD2d 777; *Matter of Ganci v Hammock,*99 AD2d 546, 548).

We have considered the remaining contentions advanced by the petitioner and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.
# L_2010123EN.01000301.xml

| 19.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 123/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 123/3

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 10 May 2010

appointing one German member of the European Economic and Social Committee

(2010/278/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 302 thereof,

Having regard to Decision 2006/524/EC, Euratom (1),

Having regard to the proposal of the German Government,

Having regard to the opinion of the Commission,

Whereas a member’s seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Wilfried WOLLER,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Mr Egbert BIERMANN, Hauptvorstand IG BCE (Main Executive Board of the Industrial Union of Mining, Chemical and Energy Workers), is hereby appointed as a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 20 September 2010.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 10 May 2010.

For the Council

The President

M. Á. MORATINOS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 207, 28.7.2006, p. 30.

1

---
# CI2021514EN.01000501.xml

| 21.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 514/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 514/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10465 – ADECCO / AKKA)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 514 I/02)

On 13 December 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10465. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10465. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### PEOPLE v. SMITH.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.

May 14, 1894.)

Criminal Law—Conviction under Plea oe Guilty.

Code Or. Proe. § 332, providing- that no conviction shall be had on the plea of guilty in cases where the crime is punishable by death or imprisonment for life, does not forbid a conviction on a plea of guilty of manslaughter in the second degree, though the indictment was for murder in the first degree.

Appeal from court of oyer and terminer, Kings county.

William J. Smith was indicted for murder in the first degree, and pleaded guilty of manslaughter in the second degree, and was sentenced to the penitentiary for a term of 10 years. He now applies for writ of habeas corpus, alleging that his imprisonment was illegal. The writ was dismissed, and he appeals. Affirmed.

Argued before BROWN, P. J., and DYKMAN and PRATT, JJ.

Stapleton & Miles, for appellant.

James W. Ridgway, Dist. Atty., for the People.

PRATT, J.

There is no merit in the contention urged by. the appellant. Section 35 of the Penal Code provides as follows: “Upon the trial of an indictment the prisoner may be convicted of the crime charged therein, or of a lesser degree of the same crime, or an *913attempt to commit the crime so charged, or an attempt to commit a lesser degree of the same crime.” This section speaks for itself. Section 332, Code Or. Proc., provides that no conviction shall be had upon a plea in cases where the crime is punishable by death or state prison for life. The appellant was not convicted of any such crime, but of one punishable for a term of years. Section 332 does not provide that a man may not plead guilty of any crime whatever, but simply that no man shall be convicted upon such a plea where the punishment is by death or imprisonment for life. The matter is too simple and plain to require argument. It may be added that courts are bound to decide under well-settled rules of statutory construction, without regard to what was the intention of the man who drafted the law. Order affirmed. AH concur.
Skip to main content

Privacy Policy•Site map

# Settlements and Alternative Dispute Resolution

Trends in Settlement in the Vaccine Program

Settlements

Alternative Dispute Resolution Options

Post-Settlement Processing

Howard T. Markey National Courts Building • 717 Madison Place, NW, Washington, DC 20439 • 202-357-6400
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>                      This schedule contains summary financial
                              information extracted from SEC Form 10-Q and is
                              qualified in its entirety by reference to such
                              financial statements.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001001540
<NAME>                        Lexington Global Asset Managers, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    US Dollar

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1
<CASH>                          9,309,510
<SECURITIES>                      688,063
<RECEIVABLES>                   1,845,779
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                13,133,000
<PP&E>                          3,376,157
<DEPRECIATION>                  2,329,600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  17,519,721
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           4,014,979
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        54,879
<OTHER-SE>                      8,934,421
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    17,519,721
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                9,208,767
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 833,192
<INCOME-TAX>                    377,362
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             399,267
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    399,267
<EPS-BASIC>                   .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                   .08




</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                                     WILSONS

Wilsons The Leather Experts Inc.
Wilsons Center, Inc.
Rosedale Wilsons, Inc.
Wilsons Leather Direct Inc.
River Hills Wilsons, Inc.
Wilsons Leather of Alabama Inc.
Wilsons Leather of Arkansas Inc.
Wilsons Leather of Connecticut Inc.
Wilsons Leather of Delaware Inc.
Wilsons Leather of Airports Inc.
Chicago O'Hare Leather Concessions Joint Venture
Airport Leather Concessions LLC (Delaware LLC)
Houston Airport Leather Concessions L.L.C.
Wilsons Leather of Florida Inc.
Wilsons Leather of Georgia Inc.
Wilsons Leather of Indiana Inc.
Wilsons Leather of Iowa Inc.
Wilsons Leather of Louisiana Inc.
Wilsons Leather of Maryland Inc.
Wilsons Leather of Massachusetts Inc.
Wilsons Leather of Michigan Inc.
Wilsons Leather of Mississippi Inc.
Wilsons Leather of Missouri Inc.
Wilsons Leather of New Jersey Inc.
Wilsons Leather of New York Inc.
Wilsons Leather of North Carolina Inc.
Wilsons Leather of Ohio Inc.
Wilsons Leather of Pennsylvania Inc.
Wilsons Leather of Rhode Island Inc.
Wilsons Leather of South Carolina Inc.
Wilsons Leather of Tennessee Inc.
Wilsons Leather of Texas Inc.
Wilsons Leather of Vermont Inc.
Wilsons Leather of Virginia Inc.
Wilsons Leather of West Virginia Inc.
Wilsons Leather of Wisconsin Inc.
Bermans the Leather Experts Inc.
Wilsons Leather Holdings Inc.
Wilsons International Inc.
Wilsons Leather of Canada Ltd.
Wilsons Leather of Hong Kong Ltd.
Wilsons (UK) Limited
Wilsons Leather Gatsland Limited
Wilsons Leather Gatsair Limited
J Ventures, Inc.
WWT, Inc.
El Portal Group, Inc.
Travel Supplies.com, LLC
Bentley's Luggage Corp.
Florida Luggage Corp
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.3

                       AMENDMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
                       ---------------------------------

         THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of June 1, 1999 (the
"Effective Date"), by and between Clare Moran (the "Executive") and LaSalle Re
Limited (the "Company");

                               WITNESSETH THAT:
                               ---------------

         WHEREAS, the parties have previously entered into an employment
agreement dated as of October 1, 1998, (the "Employment Agreement"); and

         WHEREAS, amendment of the Employment Agreement is now desirable to
reflect certain recommendations of the Compensation Committee;

         NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the Company and the
Executive that the following is substituted for paragraph 7 of the Employment
Agreement, effective June 1, 1999:

         "7. Non-competition. While the Executive is employed by LaSalle Re
             ---------------
Limited, and for a period of twelve months following the Executive's termination
of employment with LaSalle Re Limited, the Executive agrees that he or she will
not directly or indirectly perform services in a financial-related position in
Bermuda for a direct specialist reinsurance competitor of LaSalle Re Limited,
which competitor writes similar business to that of LaSalle Re Limited that is
of a predominantly property catastrophe nature. Nothing in this paragraph 7,
paragraph 8, or paragraph 9 shall be construed as limiting the Executive's duty
of loyalty to LaSalle Re Limited and the Holding Company while he or she is
employed by LaSalle Re Limited or any other duty he or she may otherwise have to
LaSalle Re Limited or the Holding Company while he or she is employed by LaSalle
Re Limited."

         IN WITNESS THEREOF, the Executive has hereunto set her hand, and the
Company has caused these presents to be executed in its name and on its behalf,
and its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed, all as of the day and year first
above written.

                                         /s/ Clare Moran
                                         ---------------------------
                                         Clare Moran

                                         LASALLE RE LIMITED

                                         By: /s/ Guy Hengesbaugh
                                             -----------------------
                                         Guy Hengesbaugh
                                         Chief Executive Officer
WASHINGTON LAKELatitude: 40.676Longitude: -110.964Elevation: 9997

WASHINGTON LAKE

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Wolf Creek Peak Site Page...



Wolf Creek Peak

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Beaver Divide Site Page...



Beaver Divide

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Hayden Fork Site Page...



Hayden Fork

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Trial Lake Site Page...



Trial Lake
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6192

IVERY SWEEZY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

STEVE BAILEY, Superintendent; BOB DELANEY,

Psychologist,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Shelby. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-14-MU)

Submitted: May 13, 1999 Decided: May 20, 1999

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ivery Sweezy, Appellant Pro Se. Curtis Oscar Massey, II, NORTH

CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Ivery Sweezy appeals the district court’s order denying relief

on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Sweezy v. Bailey, No. CA-96-14-MU (W.D.N.C.

Jan. 21, 1999). We deny Sweezy’s motion for the appointment of

counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the quarterly report of Classic Bancshares, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Lisah M. Frazier, Chief Operations Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.




Date:
      -----------------------            -------------------------------------
                                         Lisah M. Frazier
                                         Chief Operations Officer and
                                         Chief Financial Officer
# C_2021504EN.01003301.xml

| 14.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 504/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 504/33

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10532 – GIP / IFM / SYDNEY AIRPORT)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 504/07)

On 2 December 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10532. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10532. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Listen

# Advisory Committees Meetings

All Advisory Committee meetings are open for public attendance via conference call or in person, as applicable. An open session for public comment will also be available at each meeting. For further information on the Advisory Committee meetings, contact the Regional Programs Unit at (312) 353-8311.

Meeting Transcripts (by State)

## Upcoming Meetings

U.S. Virgin Islands Advisory Committee Community Forum
Event Date: April 10, 2024

Arizona Advisory Committee Public Web Briefing on Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Pediatric Healthcare - Panel IV
Event Date: March 26, 2024

Pennsylvania Advisory Committee Public Briefings on Civil Rights and the Rising Use of Artificial Intelligence in Education
Event Date: March 25, 2024

District of Columbia Advisory Committee Public Briefing on Access to Special Education and Transportation Services for Students with Disabilities in D.C. Public Schools - Panel II
Event Date: March 20, 2024

Arkansas Advisory Committee Public Briefings on Civil Rights and the Right to Counsel in Arkansas
Event Date: March 11, 2024

Nebraska Advisory Committee Public Web Briefing for Study on the Effects of the Covid-19 Pandemic on K-12 Education - Panel IV
Event Date: March 6, 2024

Maine Advisory Committee Public Web Briefing to Hear Testimony on Barriers to Fully Funding Maine’s Public Defense Services
Event Date: December 14, 2023

Minnesota Advisory Committee Public Web Briefing on Equal Access to Housing Opportunities - Panel II
Event Date: December 8, 2023

District of Columbia Advisory Committee Public Briefing on Access to Special Education and Transportation Services for Students with Disabilities in D.C. Public Schools
Event Date: November 21, 2023

Minnesota Advisory Committee Public Web Briefing on Equal Access to Housing Opportunities - Panel I
Event Date: November 9, 2023

-  1 
-  2 
-  3 
-   ...  
-   Next  
-   Last  

-  Event Calendar 
-  Public Briefings 
-  Commission Business Meetings 
-  Advisory Committees Meetings 
-  Archives
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Export-Import Bank

# TIME AND DATE: 

Thursday, September 30th, 2021 from 2:00-4:30 p.m. EDT.

# PLACE: 

The meeting will be held virtually.

# STATUS: 

                        Public Participation: The meeting will be open to public participation and time will be allotted for questions or comments submitted online. Members of the public may also file written statements before or after the meeting to                         *external@exim.gov.*                         Interested parties may register here for the meeting.                    

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Discussion of EXIM policies and programs to provide competitive financing to expand United States exports and comments for inclusion in EXIM's Report to the U.S. Congress on Global Export Credit Competition.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

For further information, contact India Walker, External Enagagement Specialist, at 202-480-0062.

Joyce B. Stone,

Assistant Corporate Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2021-19931 Filed 9-10-21; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6690-01-P