alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 174 (Monday, September 13, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 50926]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19659]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #17129 and #17130; North Dakota Disaster Number 
ND-00100]


Presidential Declaration of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of North Dakota

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of North Dakota 
(FEMA-4613-DR), dated 09/01/2021.
    Incident: Severe Storm, Straight-Line Winds, and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 06/07/2021 through 06/11/2021.

DATES: Issued on 09/01/2021.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/01/2021.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/01/2022.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 09/01/2021, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Burke, Divide, Emmons, Grant, Kidder, Lamoure, Sioux, 
Williams.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere...      2.000
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.000
For Economic Injury:
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 17129 B 
and for economic injury is 17130 0.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)


James Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2021-19659 Filed 9-10-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION


OF


PRINCIPAL
EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


PRINCIPAL
FINANCIAL OFFICER




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Manhattan
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. does hereby certify that, to the best of his
knowledge:


(a)     the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Manhattan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. for the quarter
ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(b)     information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Manhattan Pharmaceuticals,
Inc.





Dated:
      November 16, 2009
              /s/ Michael G.
      McGuinnessMichael
      G. McGuinnessPrincipal
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer
Ex.
      32





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of PNG Ventures, Inc., a Nevada corporation,
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Mark L. Baum, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
      the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.











/s/
      Mark L. Baum


Mark
      L.
      Baum


President


Chief
      Executive Officer





July
      26,
      2005
#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Storage                    
csv

      Delta Storage                    
csv

      Pool Elevation                    
csv

      Area                    
csv

      Release Volume                    
csv

      Inflow Volume                    
csv

      Inflow                    
csv

      Total Release                    
csv

#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Storage                    
json

      Delta Storage                    
json

      Pool Elevation                    
json

      Area                    
json

      Release Volume                    
json

      Inflow Volume                    
json

      Inflow                    
json

      Total Release                    
json
#### Kohn, Appellant, *v.*Reiss, Respondent.

*(Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.*

June 26, 1890.)

Appeal from fourth district court.

Argued before Allen, P. J., and Bookstaver, J.

*A. 8. Rosenthal,*for appellant. *M. Bsberg,*for respondent.

Ho opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Surface Transportation Board

          - [Docket No. EP 552 (Sub-No. 25)]

# AGENCY:

Surface Transportation Board.

# ACTION:

Notice of decision.

# SUMMARY:

On September 7, 2021, the Board served a decision announcing the 2020 revenue adequacy determinations for the Nation's Class I railroads. Five Class I railroads (BNSF Railroad Company, CSX Transportation, Inc., The Kansas City Southern Railway Company, Soo Line Corporation, and Union Pacific Railroad Company) were found to be revenue adequate.

# DATES:

This decision is effective on September 7, 2021.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Pedro Ramirez, (202) 245-0333. Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Under 49 U.S.C. 10704(a)(3), the Board is required to make an annual determination of railroad revenue adequacy. A railroad is considered revenue adequate under 49 U.S.C. 10704(a) if it achieves a rate of return on net investment (ROI) equal to at least the current cost of capital for the railroad industry. For 2020, this number was determined to be 7.89% in *R.R. Cost of Capital—2020,* EP 558 (Sub-No. 24) (STB served Aug. 6, 2021). The Board then applied this revenue adequacy standard to each Class I railroad. Five Class I carriers (BNSF Railroad Company, CSX Transportation, Inc., The Kansas City Southern Railway Company, Soo Line Corporation, and Union Pacific Railroad Company) were found to be revenue adequate for 2020.

The decision in this proceeding is posted at *www.stb.gov.*

Decided: September 3, 2021.

By the Board, Board Members Begeman, Fuchs, Oberman, Primus, and Schultz.

Eden Besera,

Clearance Clerk.

[FR Doc. 2021-19539 Filed 9-9-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BLOUNT INTERNATIONAL, INC. FOR THE
PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998, AS SET FORTH IN ITS FORM 10-Q FOR SUCH PERIOD
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          9,574
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 168,182
<ALLOWANCES>                                    4,991
<INVENTORY>                                   127,923
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              329,619
<PP&E>                                        388,608
<DEPRECIATION>                                204,240
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                667,365
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         112,244
<BONDS>                                       161,689
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          389
<OTHER-SE>                                    341,344
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  667,365
<SALES>                                       631,471
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              631,471
<CGS>                                         437,151
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 437,151
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             10,759
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                75,204
<INCOME-TAX>                                   28,542
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            46,662
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,984)
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   44,678
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.60<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.58<F1>
<FN>
<F1> RESTATEMENT REFLECTED HEREIN IS THE RESULT OF THE PRORATION AND STOCK
ELECTION PROCEDURES RELATED TO THE AUGUST 19, 1999 MERGER AS DESCRIBED IN
NOTE 2 OF NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN
BLOUNT INTERNATIONAL, INC.'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### John W. Giblin, Sr., Respondent, v Stephen G. Murphy et al., Appellants.

— Mikoll, J.

Appeal from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of plaintiff, entered October 7, 1985 in Schoharie County, upon a decision of the court at Trial Term (Hughes, J.), without a jury.

This matter was previously before us (97 AD2d 668). Trial Term granted plaintiff damages of $110,268.60 against all defendants severally and jointly, punitive damages of $150,000, counsel fees of $52,053.72 and costs of $1,563.40. The case was remitted for a new trial on the issue of the reasonable value of counsel fees. On remittal, Trial Term awarded counsel fees in the sum of $22,053.60, finding that the contract which entitled plaintiff to obtain counsel fees of 20% of the recovery was a reasonable amount for collection on the note and more appropriate than an award on an hourly basis because of the type of service and difficulty of the case.

On this appeal, defendants urge that there is no basis for an award of counsel fees on the note in that the suit was based on a legitimate dispute between the parties and in such instance no fees were provided for under the terms of the note sued on. Additionally, defendants urge that Trial Term’s award was excessive.

There should be an affirmance. Entitlement to counsel fees was previously decided by this court and the issue is not properly before us at this juncture. Based on the record, the award of counsel fees was entirely appropriate under the circumstances. The case was intricate, requiring the ability and experience of a skillful counsel, the amount involved was considerable and the results obtained were good and to the client’s benefit.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Levine, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



           In connection with the Quarterly Report of Blount International, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Calvin E. Jenness, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such
officer's knowledge:

      (i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the report.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Blount International, Inc. and will be retained by Blount
International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.


Date:  November 19, 2004


/s/ Calvin E. Jenness
---------------------
Calvin E. Jenness
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Exhibit 31.6

CERTIFICATIONS

I,
Richard E. Davis, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 on Form 10-K/A of NMT Medical, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





|                    |  |                                                                                                                  
|------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: June 18, 2010 |  | /S/    RICHARD E.
DAVIS                                                                                          
|                    |  | Richard E. Davis
Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
BLD
- 178 NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________ No. 15

- 1589

___________ IN RE: KIM RAGLAND ,

Petitioner

____________________________________ On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United States Di strict Court for the District of New Jersey (Related to D.N.J. Civ. No. 2:14

- cv
- 07294 )

____________________________________ Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

April 23, 2015
Before: AMBRO, JORDAN and KRAUSE , Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: M ay 1, 2015 )

_________ OPINION *

_________ PER CURIAM Kim Ragland presents a petition for writ of mandamus requesting that we direct
the District Court to rule on a habeas petition that he filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

* This disposition is not an opinion of the full C ourt and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent.2

Ragland filed his habeas pe tition in the District Court in November 2014 , see D.N.J. Civ. No. 2:14

- cv
- 07294

. 1 On the same day that Ragland’s mandamus petition was docketed in this Court, the District Court entered an opinion and order dismissing that petition for failure to exhaust state court remedies

. In light of the District Court’s action,

we will dismiss the mandamus petition as moot. See , e.g. , Lusardi v. Xerox Corp. , 975 F.2d 964, 974 (3d Cir. 1992); see also Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum Corp. , 77 F.3d 690,
698

- 99 (3d Cir. 1996) (“If developments occur during the course of adjudication that eliminate a plaintiff’s personal stake in the outcome of a suit or prevent a court from being able to grant the requested relief, the case must be dismissed as moot.”)

1 In his mandamus petition, Ra gland explains that he filed this petition because the District Court had not ruled on an earlier § 2254 petition that he h ad submitted , see D.N.J. Civ. No. 2:14

- cv
- 02381. However, as is evident from a June 4, 2014 order that appears on the docket for D.N.J. Civ. No. 2:14

- cv
- 02381 and as an attachment to Ragland’s mandamus petition, the District Court entered an order adminis tratively terminating that case because Ragland had not filed his habeas petition on the appropriate forms

. We do not understand Ragland to be seeking mandamus relief in relation to that action. We note, nonetheless, that a motion remains pending in that matter. When it administratively terminated the case, t he District Court noted that it would reopen if Ragland re

- filed his petition on the appropriate forms within 30 days of the Court’s order. Ragland did not do so ; he instead sought an extension of t ime to re

- file. Although Ragland ultimately re

- filed his petition on the appropriate forms in the separate action that underlies this case, that motion for an extension of time remains pending in D. N.J. Civ. No. 2:14

- cv
- 02381

.
FERRON CREEK (UPPER STATION) NEAR FERRON, UTLatitude: 39.104Longitude: -111.217Elevation: 6219

FERRON CREEK (UPPER STATION) NEAR FERRON, UT

Courtesy NRCS - Go to GBRC Meadows Site Page...



GBRC Meadows

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Mt Baldy Site Page...



Mt Baldy

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Thistle Flat Site Page...



Thistle Flat

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Wrigley Creek Site Page...



Wrigley Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Buck Flat Site Page...



Buck Flat

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Seeley Creek Site Page...



Seeley Creek
#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Ave Air Temp                    
csv

      Min Air Temp                    
csv

      Max Air Temp                    
csv

      Ave Dewpoint                    
csv

      Peak Wind Gust                    
csv

      Evapotranspiration, Kimberly-Penman                    
csv

      Evapotranspiration, Asce-Ewri Grass                    
csv

      Evapotranspiration, Asce-Ewri Alfalfa                    
csv

      Precipitation                    
csv

      Wy Precip                    
csv

      Avg Net Radiation                    
csv

      Ave Relative Humidity                    
csv

      Growing Degree Days                    
csv

      Ave Wind Speed                    
csv

      Ave Wind Direction                    
csv

      Wind Run                    
csv

      Maximum Shielded Canopy Temperature                    
csv

      Minimum Shielded Canopy Temperature                    
csv

      Precip Accum                    
csv

#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Ave Air Temp                    
json

      Min Air Temp                    
json

      Max Air Temp                    
json

      Ave Dewpoint                    
json

      Peak Wind Gust                    
json

      Evapotranspiration, Kimberly-Penman                    
json

      Evapotranspiration, Asce-Ewri Grass                    
json

      Evapotranspiration, Asce-Ewri Alfalfa                    
json

      Precipitation                    
json

      Wy Precip                    
json

      Avg Net Radiation                    
json

      Ave Relative Humidity                    
json

      Growing Degree Days                    
json

      Ave Wind Speed                    
json

      Ave Wind Direction                    
json

      Wind Run                    
json

      Maximum Shielded Canopy Temperature                    
json

      Minimum Shielded Canopy Temperature                    
json

      Precip Accum                    
json
Black Canyon Peak Flow Determination

based on Blue Mesa May 1 forecast

0

2000400060008000

10000120001400016000

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 

Apr-Jul BM Inflow (KAF)

Peak (cfs)

1

2

3

4

5

6

1. 100 - 372 K ; y = 482.95 + 1.44x2. 373 - 715 K ; y = - 4651.66 + 15.24x3. 716 - 925 K ; y = 5449.13 + 1.15x4. 926 - 1001K; y = - 6975.28 + 14.57x5. 1002-1050K; y = - 62886.00 + 70.40x6. > 1050 K ; y = - 180.00 + 10.68x
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-10878

Summary Calendar

ROBERT V. MCLENNAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

KERRI VEITCH, and John Doe Veitch, in her official and individual capacity;

LARRY GARRETT, and Jane Doe Garrett, in his official and individual

capacity; LARRY DAVIS, and Jane Doe Davis, in his official and individual

capacity; RANDLE EFFLANDT, and Jane Doe Efflandlt, in his official and

individual capacity; REGGIE BONNER, and Jane Doe Bonner, in his official

and individual capacity; KELLY MCNAIR, and Jane Doe McNair, in his

official and individual capacity, 

Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:12-CV-531

Before WIENER, ELROD, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM*

AFFIRMED. See 5th Cir. Rule 47.6.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 30, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-10878 Document: 00512225079 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/30/2013
WILBORN LAW OFFICE, P.C. 

TIM WILBORN, Attorney at Law - OSB # 944644 

tim@wilbornlaw.com 

P.O. Box 370518 

Las Vegas, NV 89137 

Voice: (702) 240-0184 

Fax: (503) 926-9133 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF O,REGON 

ELISSA KENNEDY SIDERS,. 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

COMMISSIONER of Social Security, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 6:15-cv-2184-KI 

••• .,ORDER 

Attorney fees in the amount of $9,000.00 are hereby awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to the 

Equal Access To Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). Subject to any offset allowed under the Treasury 

Offset Program, payment of this award shall be made via check sent to Tim Wilborn's address: P.O. 

Box 370578, Las Vegas, NV 89137. In accordance with the fee assignment which Plaintiff has 

signed, payment shall be made in Tim Wilborn's name if no debt subject to offset exists. 

DATED this {0 day of--'~'--<-~_. ___ , 2017. 

Submitted on February 2, 2017 by: 

s/ Tim Wilborn 

TIM WILBORN, OSB # 944644 

(702) 240-0184 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

ORDER - Page 1 

Case 6:15-cv-02184-KI Document 25 Filed 02/10/17 Page 1 of 1