alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

## Filings Instituting Proceedings

*Docket Numbers:* RP21-1106-000.

*Applicants:* Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America LLC.

*Description:* § 4(d) Rate Filing: Amendment to a Negotiated Rate Agreement—Woodriver Energy LLC to be effective 9/9/2021.

*Filed Date:* 9/9/21.

*Accession Number:* 20210909-5071.

*Comment Date:* 5 p.m. ET 9/21/21.

*Docket Numbers:* RP21-1107-000.

*Applicants:* El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.

*Description:* § 4(d) Rate Filing: Non-Conforming Agreement Filing (SoCal) to be effective 11/1/2021.

*Filed Date:* 9/9/21.

*Accession Number:* 20210909-5144.

*Comment Date:* 5 p.m. ET 9/21/21.

The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system (*https://elibrary.ferc.gov/​idmws/​search/​fercgensearch.asp*) by querying the docket number.

Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding.

eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying facilities filings can be found at: *http://www.ferc.gov/​docs-filing/​efiling/​filing-req.pdf.* For other information, call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Dated: September 10, 2021.

Debbie-Anne A. Reese,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2021-20025 Filed 9-15-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
# C_2021348EN.01000101.xml

| 30.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 348/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 348/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10425 — BCP Dornoch Parent/DexKo)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 348/01)

On 24 August 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10425. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10425. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### Zelinet C. Moya et al., Appellants, v Penske Truck Leasing Company et al., Respondents.

Submitted April 30, 2007;

decided June 5, 2007

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the Court of Appeals does not have jurisdiction to entertain this motion for leave to appeal from the order of the Appellate Division entered in this action which is treated as if commenced in the Civil Court of the City of New York (NY Const, art VI, § 3 [bj [7]; CPLR 5602 (a]; *see also*CPLR 326 [b]).
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         67
<SECURITIES>                                   152,877
<RECEIVABLES>                                  170,289
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               323,234
<PP&E>                                         2,283,238
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,364,265
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          556,249
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3,160
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,449,981
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,364,265
<SALES>                                        229,109
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               229,109
<CGS>                                          128,549
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  128,549
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               148,217
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             22,266
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                77,300
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   77,300
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.02
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-85808), the
Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-130978), the Registration statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-75792), and the
Registration statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-75788) of Precis, Inc. of our report dated March 24, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial
statements which appear in this Form 10-K.

/s/ HEIN & Associates LLP

Dallas,
Texas
March 30, 2006

---



QuickLinks
Listen

# Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2022 – 2026

March 29, 2022

The Commission solicited the views of Commissioners, staff members, Congress, and stakeholders to identify areas of strength and weakness within the Commission and its activities. The Commission used this input to facilitate the development of our strategic goals.

Strategic Plan

-  All Reports 
-  Annual Statutory Enforcement 
-  Briefing Reports 
-  Advisory Committees Reports 
-  Budget and Performance 
-  FOIA Reports 
-  Data Inventory Program 
-  Civil Rights Complaints 
-  Historical Publications 
-  Archives
----

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual  report of Silver Dragon Resources Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the  period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kirk Boyd, Chief Accounting  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  

(1)  The Report fully complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act  of 1934; and 

(2)  The information contained in  the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition  and results of operations of the Company. 

|                                                                                                                  | Date: May 15, 2007 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|
|                                                                                                                  |               |   |
|  
 By:
        /s/ Kirk Boyd              Kirk Boyd
 
 
Chief Accounting Officer
  |
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2021001EN.01000401.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 4.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 1/4 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10074 — Hyundai Motor Company/Hyundai Assan Otomotive Sanayi)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 1/04)

1.

On 21 December 2020, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2021001EN.01000401-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Hyundai Motor Company (‘HMC’, South Korea), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Hyundai Assan Otomotiv Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.Ş. (‘HAOS’, Turkey). |

HMC acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of HAOS.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for HMC: activities in the motor vehicle sector, including the business of manufacture and sale of motor vehicles, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for HAOS: manufacturing and exporting Hyundai motor vehicles. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2021001EN.01000401-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10074 — Hyundai Motor Company/Hyundai Assan Otomotive Sanayi

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2021001EN.01000401-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2021001EN.01000401-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
Exhibit
32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The
undersigned, Antonio Milici, the Chief Executive Officer of GeneThera, Inc. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:



1.      
The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.      
Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
of the Company.



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement this 21st day of September , 2020.



| | /s/ Antonio
    Milici                                                     
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Antonio
    Milici
    Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to GeneThera, Inc. and will be retained by
GeneThera, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The
foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated
by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Albert Ridley, Appellant.

The defendant’s contention that the police did not have probable cause to arrest him lacks merit. The defendant matched the description relayed over the police radio and was observed near the scene of the crime within 5 to 10 minutes after the occurrence. These facts, considered together with the defendant’s suspicious behavior in standing behind a bush counting money, provided the necessary predicate for a finding of probable cause to effectuate the defendant’s arrest *(see, People v Lypka,*36 NY2d 210; *People v Saylor,*113 AD2d 904; *People v Messam,*112 AD2d 449).

Moreover, we reject the defendant’s contention that the showup identification which occurred in close proximity in time and place to the commission of the crime was unduly suggestive so as to give rise to a substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification. Under the circumstances, the showup was proper to ensure prompt identification *(see, People v Love,*57 NY2d 1023; *People v Brnja,*50 NY2d 366).

The court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant’s oral application to withdraw his pleas of guilty. The record establishes that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived his rights and pleaded guilty *(see, People v Harris,*61 NY2d 9). The record provided no grounds for the withdrawal of the pleas *(People v Ramos,*63 NY2d 640, 642-643).

*611Lastly, we do not find the sentences imposed to be unduly harsh or excessive. The concurrent terms at 9 to 18 years are within the legally permissible range (Penal Law § 70.04 [3], [4]) and are the ones for which the defendant freely bargained (see, *e.g., People v La Lande,*104 AD2d 1052; *People v Kazepis,*101 AD2d 816). Thompson, J. P., Weinstein, Rubin and Spatt, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

          - [RTID: 0648-XB359]

# AGENCY:

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice; public meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council's Surfclam and Ocean Quahog Advisory Panel will hold a public meeting.

# DATES:

                        The meeting will be held on Wednesday, October 13, 2021 from 9:30 a.m. until 12:00 p.m. For agenda details, see                         **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**                        .                    

# ADDRESSES:

                        The meeting will be held via webinar. Webinar connection information will be available at:                         *https://www.mafmc.org/​council-events.*

*Council address:*                         Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 674-2331;                         *www.mafmc.org.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D., Executive Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, telephone: (302) 526-5255.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council's Surfclam and Ocean Quahog Advisory Panel will meet to provide input on a draft document being prepared for the Council to address issues related to the species separation requirements in the Atlantic surfclam and ocean quahog fisheries.

## Special Accommodations

The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aid should be directed to Shelley Spedden, (302) 526-5251, at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.

*Authority:*16 U.S.C. 1801*et seq.*

Dated: September 3, 2021.

Tracey L. Thompson,

Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 2021-19484 Filed 9-7-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
EX-10.6





 Exhibit 10.6 

AMENDMENT TO 
 ESS TECH,
INC. 2014 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 
 THIS AMENDMENT to ESS Tech, Inc. 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is
dated as of December 23, 2014. 
 RECITALS 

WHEREAS, the Plan was originally adopted by Energy Storage Systems Inc., an Oregon corporation (the “Oregon
Corporation”) on January 9, 2014; 
 WHEREAS, the Oregon Corporation was converted to ESS Tech, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”) on December 23, 2014 (the “Conversion”); 
 WHEREAS, under
Section 2(b)(vi) of the Plan, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) has the authority to amend the Plan; 

WHEREAS, in connection with the Conversion, the Board has deemed it advisable and in the best interest of the Company to amend the Plan in
order to reflect the Conversion; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 

AMENDMENTS 
  

	 	1.	 Section 12 is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 



CHOICE OF LAW. 
 The law of the
State of Delaware shall govern all questions concerning the construction, validity and interpretation of this Plan, without regard to that state’s conflict of laws rules. 
  


	 	2.	 Section 13(i) is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 



“Company” means ESS Tech, Inc., a Delaware corporation. 
  

	 	3.	 In all other respects, the ESS Tech, Inc. 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, remains unchanged and in full force and
effect. 














 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be adopted as of the date first
written above. 
  

	
	ESS Tech, Inc.
	
	 /s/ Craig Evans

	Craig Evans, President
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Leroy Sprinkler, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Miller, J.), rendered June 19, 1984, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The evidence adduced at the trial was sufficient to prove the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the crime of manslaughter in the first degree. We have considered the defendant’s other contentions and have found them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Rubin, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
#### MACK, Respondent, v. ANDERSON, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

December 16, 1896.)

Action by John J. Mack against Robert H. Anderson.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. See 33 N. Y. Supp. 208.
#### TOCH, Appellant, v. TOCH et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 23, 1896.)

Action by Serena Toch against Henry M. Toch and others. Chas.

G. F. Wahle, for appellant.

Louis Wertheimer, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the opinion herewith handed down in the case of Toch v. Toch, 41 N. Y. Supp. 353, this order must be reversed, with $10 costs, and the motion denied, with $10 costs.