alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT of INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors

Prescient Applied Intelligence, Inc. f/k/a The viaLink Company:

We consent
to the incorporation by reference in the following registration statements of Prescient Applied Intelligence, Inc. f/k/a The viaLink Company of our report dated March 28, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Prescient Applied
Intelligence as of December 31, 2004, and the related consolidated statement of operations, stockholders equity (deficit), and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2004, which report appears in the December 31, 2005,
annual report on Form 10-KSB of Prescient Applied Intelligence.

Our report dated March 28, 2005, contains an explanatory paragraph that states that
the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and is dependent upon access to additional external financing, which raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not
include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.



|          |  |                   
|--------- |  | ------------------
|Form Type |  | RegistrationNumber
|Form S-3  |  | 333-55912         
|Form S-8  |  | 333-41320         

/s/ KPMG LLP

Dallas, Texas

March 28, 2006
**Basin Data****  % Median Precipitation      **  % Median SWE      **Reservoir Data****  Storage      **  Pool Elevation      **  Inflow      **  Release              Updated: June 03, 2024 14:12**  Upper Colorado Basin
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 29, 2020

NO. 03-19-00348-CV

Appellant, Glenn Hegar, Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts // Cross-Appellants, 

Arnulfo P. Alcorta; Jose Abram Alcorta; Reyes Alcorta; Armando Alvarado, Jr.; 

David A. Arizmendi; Teresa Arizmendi-Gordon; Adela A. Bautista; Guadalupe Cantu, Jr.; 

Jose Angel Gomez Cantu; Julian Jesus Torres Cantu; Olga Cantu; Olivia T. Cantu; 

Hortencia Cantu Castillo; Carmelo Cordero; Guadalupe Torres Corona; Margarita Diaz; 

Maria Torres Galvan; Frances A. Garcia; Guadalupe S. Gonzales; Julia C. Gonzalez; 

Maria Christina Gonzales; Pedro T. Guajardo; Juanita T. Hernandez; 

Margarita T. Hernandez; Brandon R. Hugonnett; Christopher Hugonnett; 

Jose Luis Hugonnett; Manuel Hugonnett; Maria Guadalupe Hugonnett; 

Ricardo Guillermo Hugonnett; Shawn Hugonnett; Cleofas Torres Juarez; 

Dora Alicia Medina; Aurora Diana Cantu Mejia; Rosalinda Cantu Pena; 

Edwardo Ramos, Jr.; Eloyd D. Ramos; Linda A. Rios; Carmen Rodriguez; 

Maria Del Rosario Rodriguez; Carlos Salazar; Velma Thies; Beatris Torres; 

Cosme Torres, Jr.; James Torres; Jose Angel Torres; Jose Luis Torres; Marcelina Torres; 

Raul Torres; Alfredo R. Torrez; Miguel Torrez; Isabel C. Vasquez; Mary T. Venable, and 

Irma Salazar Villanueva

v.

Appellees, Arnulfo P. Alcorta, Jose Abram Alcorta; Reyes Alcorta; 

Armando Alvarado, Jr.; David A. Arizmendi; Teresa Arizmendi-Gordon; 

Adela A. Bautista; Guadalupe Cantu, Jr.; Jose Angel Gomez Cantu; 

Julian Jesus Torres Cantu; Olga Cantu; Olivia T. Cantu; Hortencia Cantu Castillo; 

Carmelo Cordero; Guadalupe Torres Corona; Margarita Diaz; Maria Torres Galvan; 

Frances A. Garcia; Guadalupe S. Gonzales; Julia C. Gonzalez; Maria Christina Gonzales; 

Pedro T. Guajardo; Juanita T. Hernandez; Margarita T. Hernandez; 

Brandon R. Hugonnett; Christopher Hugonnett; Jose Luis Hugonnett; Manuel Hugonnett; 

Maria Guadalupe Hugonnett; Ricardo Guillermo Hugonnett; Shawn Hugonnett; 

Cleofas Torres Juarez; Dora Alicia Medina; Aurora Diana Cantu Mejia; 

Rosalinda Cantu Pena; Edwardo Ramos, Jr.; Eloyd D. Ramos; Linda A. Rios; 

Carmen Rodriguez; Maria Del Rosario Rodriguez; Carlos Salazar; Velma Thies;

Beatris Torres; Cosme Torres, Jr.; James Torres; Jose Angel Torres; Jose Luis Torres; 

Marcelina Torres; Raul Torres; Alfredo R. Torrez; Miguel Torrez; Isabel C. Vasquez; 

Mary T. Venable, and Irma Salazar Villanueva, // Cross-Appellee, Glenn Hegar, 

Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts
APPEAL FROM 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND SMITH

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE SMITH

This is an appeal from the interlocutory order signed by the trial court on May 17, 2019. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the trial court’s interlocutory order. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s interlocutory

order. The appellant/cross-appellee shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court 

and in the court below.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6498
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ARTHUR ALAN OUTLAW, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (4:00-cr-70114-jlk-1) Submitted: June 10, 2008 Decided: June 18, 2008 Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Arthur Alan Outlaw, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Arthur Alan Outlaw appeals the district court’s order reducing his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). Outlaw seeks further reduction of his sentence pursuant to United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220 (2005). The relief Outlaw seeks is unavailable under § 3582(c)(2). See United States v. Goines , 357 F.3d 469, 473 (4th Cir. 2004) (noting that § 3582(c)(2) authorizes a “district court to reduce the sentence imposed on a defendant who has been sentenced to a term of imprisonment based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(o)”); see also United States v. Moreno , 421 F.3d 1217, 1220 (11th Cir. 2005) (“Bookeris inapplicable to § 3582(c)(2) motions.”). Accordingly, we affirm the order of the distr ict court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.1

                         CERTIFICATION OF THE PRESIDENT
                         AND THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Antonio Milici, M.D., Ph.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of
Genethera, Inc. (the "Company"), do hereby certify to the best of my knowledge
and belief that:

      (1) The Company's annual report on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended
December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: June 3, 2005


By: /s/ Antonio Milici
----------------------
Antonio Milici, M.D., Ph.D., President
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No.333-31751, 333-67265, 333-62618, 333-107462 and 333-118041) pertaining to various NMT Medical, Inc. employee stock purchase plans and stock option plans of our report dated February 21, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements ofNMT Medical, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004. 

 

            /s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Boston, Massachusetts 

March 21, 2005
Opinion issued October 31, 2023

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 23
- 0 0430
- CV

——————————— IVAN MONTALVO , Appellant

V. CITY OF HITCHCOCK , Appellee

On Appeal from the 122nd District Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 21
- CV
- 1200

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Ivan Montalvo, filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s February 21, 2023 final judgment dismissing the underlying cause for want of
prosecu tion. A ppellant has failed to timely file a brief. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 38.6(a) (governing time to file brief).2

On June 9, 2023, the court reporter notified the Court that no reporter’s record was taken in this case, and on June 26, 2023, the clerk’s record was filed. Accordingly, appellant’s brief was due to be filed on or before July 26, 2023. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 38.6(a). Appellant did not file an appellant’s brief. On August 15, 2023, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that this appeal was subject to dismissal unless a brief, or a motion to extend time to file a brief, was filed within ten days of the n otice. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 38.8(a) (governing failure of appellant to file brief), 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal of appeal for want of prosecution), 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case for failure to comply with notice from Clerk of Court). Despite the notice that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. Accordingly, we dismiss th is appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3(b), 43.2(f). A ll pending motions are dismissed as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Rivas

- Molloy, and Gue r ra .
<PAGE>


Exhibit 23.2


                            CONSENT OF KPMG LLP

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Form S-8 (No. 333-71890) of our report dated January 24, 2001, except as to
Note 1, which is as of February 7, 2001, with respect to the consolidated
balance sheet as of December 31, 2000, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows of Corsair
Communications and subsidiaries for each of the years in the two-year period
ended December 31, 2000, which report appears in the annual report on Form
10-K of Lightbridge, Inc.


Mountain View, California
March 28, 2002
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2021367EN.01000601.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 13.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 367/6 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10413 — Apollo Management/Reno De Medici)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 367/06)

1.

On 3 September 2021, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2021367EN.01000601-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Apollo Management, L.P. (‘Apollo’, USA), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Reno De Medici S.p.A. (‘Reno De Medici’ Italy). |

Apollo acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Reno De Medici.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for Apollo: portfolio investments, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for Reno De Medici: manufacturing, production, and distribution of recycled and specialty cardboard products. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2021367EN.01000601-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10413 — Apollo Management/Reno De Medici

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2021367EN.01000601-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2021367EN.01000601-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2049 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2049

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to prohibit foreign 
  nationals from making contributions or donations in connection with 
           State and local ballot initiatives and referenda.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 28, 2015

  Mr. Deutch introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to prohibit foreign 
  nationals from making contributions or donations in connection with 
           State and local ballot initiatives and referenda.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Keeping Foreign Money Out of 
Politics Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITING CONTRIBUTIONS AND DONATIONS BY FOREIGN NATIONALS IN 
              CONNECTION WITH BALLOT INITIATIVES AND REFERENDA.

    (a) Prohibition.--Section 319(a)(1)(A) of the Federal Election 
Campaign Act of 1971 (52 U.S.C. 30121(a)(1)(A)) is amended by striking 
``election;'' and inserting the following: ``election, including a 
State or local ballot initiative or referendum;''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to contributions or donations made, solicited, 
accepted, or received on or after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### LOOMER, Respondent, v. VILLAGE OF DOLGEVILLE, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March, 1896.)

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 ■costs and disbursements.
Listen

# Briefing Reports

-    First  
-    Previous  
-   ...  
-  3 
-  4 
-  5 
-  6 
-  7 
-   ...  
-   Next  
-   Last  

-  All Reports 
-  Annual Statutory Enforcement 
-  Briefing Reports 
-  Advisory Committees Reports 
-  Budget and Performance 
-  FOIA Reports 
-  Data Inventory Program 
-  Civil Rights Complaints 
-  Historical Publications 
-  Archives
- Skip to Primary Navigation
      - Skip to Main Content
      - Skip to Footer

          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   

          -  Water & Power              - Dams
            - Powerplants
            - Projects
            - Agrimet/Hydromet
            - Water Operations 
          -  Resources & Research              - Programs
            - Technical Service Center
            - Research & Development
            - Reclamation Manual
            - Environmental Resources/Reports
            - Library 
          -  About Us              - Mission/Vision
            - Fact Sheet
            - Commissioner
            - Addresses/Contacts
            - Organizational Chart
            - Leadership Bios
            - Employment
            - Contact 
          -  Recreation & Public Use              - Find Recreation
            - Recreation.gov
            - Public Use 
          -     News & Multimedia              - News Releases
            - News Stories
            - Speeches
            - Congressional Testimony
            - Fact Sheets
            - Photos
            - Multimedia
            - Social Media 

# Upper Colorado Region

Encompassing all or parts of Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, Utah and Wyoming

                - Reclamation
                - Upper Colorado Region
                - Water Operations
                - Navajo Shortage

UC Region                - Upper Colorado Home
                - About Us
                - Area Offices
                - Programs & Activities
                - Environmental Documents
                - Water Operations          Navajo Dam Project Shortage Notices**Project Notices**
**BUREAU OF RECLAMATION          NAVAJO RESERVOIR 2013 - 2016 Shortage Sharing Information          July 2, 2012- Recommendations for San Juan River Operations and Administration for 2013-2016 (pdf)
- Endorsement Memos (pdf)
- Letter to New Mexico Office of the State Engineer (pdf)
- Acceptance Letter from New Mexico Office of the State Engineer (pdf)

Contact

Email comments/inquires to: WestColoAreaOffice@usbr.gov

*Last Updated:           7/5/16*
More Information about the U.S. Bureau of ReclamationStay in Touch- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- Contact Us
- Site Index
- Accessibility
- Disclaimer
- DOI
- FOIA
- No Fear Act
- Notices
- Privacy Policy
- Quality of Information
- Recreation.gov
- USA.gov**
Skip to main content

Privacy Policy•Site map

# Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran was appointed as a Special Master of the United States Court of Federal Claims on January 13, 2014. He graduated cum laude, with high honors in his major, from Dartmouth College in 1988. He received his J.D. in 1991 from the University of Virginia School of Law. He was designated Chief Special Master by the court to succeed Nora Beth Dorsey, effective October 1, 2019.

Mr. Corcoran is a seasoned trial attorney with experience in a wide variety of legal matters, including intellectual property, general commercial disputes, tax matters, and pro bono civil rights and employment discrimination actions. Until 2008, he was employed in the private sector, rising to the level of partner in the Washington, D.C. office of Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP. From 2008 to 2014, Mr. Corcoran worked for the Department of Justice, Tax Division, as a trial attorney, where he obtained numerous permanent injunctions against fraudulent tax preparers and the promoters of illegal tax schemes across the United States.

Mr. Corcoran is admitted to the bars of New York and the District of Columbia, as well as numerous federal district courts.

Howard T. Markey National Courts Building • 717 Madison Place, NW, Washington, DC 20439 • 202-357-6400
PRICE RIVER AT WOODSIDE, UTLatitude: 39.264Longitude: -110.343Elevation: 4623

PRICE RIVER AT WOODSIDE, UT

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Timberline Site Page...



Timberline

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Huntington Horse Site Page...



Huntington Horse

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Corral Site Page...



Corral

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Price Site Page...



Price

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Clear Creek #1 Site Page...



Clear Creek #1

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Wilbur Bench Site Page...



Wilbur Bench

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Mammoth-Cottonwood Site Page...



Mammoth-Cottonwood

Courtesy NRCS - Go to White River #1 Site Page...



White River #1
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]



# United States Court of Appeals

**For the First Circuit**

No. 00-1253 A. G. EDWARDS, JR., Plaintiff, Appellant,

v. MBNA AMERICA, ET AL., Defendants, Appellees. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Douglas P. Woodlock, U.S. District Judge ] Before Torruella, Chief Judge , Selya and Lipez, Circuit Judges .
A. G. Edwards, Jr. on brief pro se. Thomas W. Evans and Cohen& Fiermanon brief for appellees.

December 1, 2000Per Curiam . Appellant A.G. Edwards, Jr. appeals

fromthe district court judgment granting the motion to dismiss of appellee MBNA America. We affirm this judgment for essentially the reasons stated at the hearing held on January 13, 2000. We add, moreover, that the appellant has presented no evidence to support his claims that the district court acted unfairly, and/or was biased against him, and/or did not properly apply the law to the facts of record.

Affirmed . See Local Rule 27(c).
# C_2021466EN.01000101.xml

| 18.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 466/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 466/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10510 – APOLLO MANAGEMENT / K1 GROUP)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 466/01)

On 12 November 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10510. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10510. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---