alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- Skip to Primary Navigation
      - Skip to Main Content
      - Skip to Footer

          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   

        -  Water & Power            - Dams
          - Powerplants
          - Projects
          - Agrimet/Hydromet
          - Water Operations 
        -  Resources & Research            - Programs
          - Technical Service Center
          - Research & Development
          - Reclamation Manual
          - Reclamation Information Sharing Environment (RISE)
          - Environmental Resources/Reports
          - Library 
        -  About Us            - Mission
          - Fact Sheet
          - Commissioner
          - Addresses/Contacts
          - Organizational Chart
          - Leadership Bios
          - Employment
          - Contact 
        -  Recreation & Public Use            - Find Recreation
          - Recreation.gov
          - Public Use 
        -  News & Multimedia            - News Releases
          - News Stories
          - Speeches
          - Congressional Testimony
          - Fact Sheets
          - Photos
          - Multimedia
          - Social Media 

# WaterSMART Grants

Desalination

            - Reclamation
            - WaterSMART
            - Desalination
            - Previous Fudning Opportunities

WaterSMART              - WaterSMART
              - Water and Energy Efficiency Grants
              - Water Strategy Grants
              - Project Design Grants
              - Small-Scale Water Efficiency Projects
              - Environmental Water Resources Projects
              - Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Program
              - Water Recycling and Desalination
              - Large-Scale Water Recycling Program
              - Desalination Construction                  - Eligible Projects
                - Previous Grant Selections
                - Previous Funding Opportunities
                - Contacts 
              - Basin Studies
              - Baseline Assessments and Pilots
              - Reservoir Operation Pilots
              - Applied Science Grants
              - Cooperative Watershed Management Program
              - Drought Program
              - Water Conservation Field Services Program

## Previous Funding Opportunities

2023 Funding Opportunity Announcement

*Last Updated: 10/6/23*

## More Information about the Bureau of Reclamation

## Stay in Touch

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

            - Contact Us
            - Site Index
            - Accessibility
            - Disclaimer
            - DOI
            - FOIA
            - No Fear Act
            - Notices
            - Privacy Policy
            - Quality of Information
            - USA.gov
            - Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
PRECEDING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,635
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              67
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          24,490
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            23,946
<LOANS>                                        129,682
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (1,364)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 167,250
<DEPOSITS>                                     133,213
<SHORT-TERM>                                    18,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,224
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        552
<COMMON>                                         9,123
<OTHER-SE>                                       (709)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 167,250
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  7,173
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,147
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    42
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 8,362
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,292
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,676
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,686
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      225
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    577
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         577
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       342
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.33
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   0.073
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,379
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               (1,151)
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       12
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              (1,364)
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           (1,364)
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            321


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carlton Brown, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kay, J.), rendered October 7, 1982, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of the defendant’s motion to suppress certain statements.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The hearing court properly determined that both the statements made by the dying victim to his mother and uncle within four minutes of having been shot three times and those made to a police officer at the hospital within 30 minutes of the incident, which implicated the defendant in the shooting, were admissible as spontaneous declarations or excited utterances. The circumstances surrounding the victim’s declarations reasonably justify the conclusion that they were uttered while the victim remained under the influence of the stress and excitement precipitated by the shooting and were not made "under the impetus of studied reflection” *(People v Edwards,*47 NY2d 493, 497).

While the second set of statements made to the police officer were uttered almost one-half hour after the shooting and in response to questions posed by the officer, the record supports the conclusion that the declarant, who was determined to be in critical condition, suffering from "hemorrhagic shock” and severe pain and whose physical condition was rapidly deteriorating, made them "when emotional excitement continue[d] to dominate and [his] reflective powers [were] still in abeyance” *(People v Edwards, supra,*at p 498; *see, People v Nieves,*67 NY2d 125, 135; *Matter of Lydia K., 112*AD2d 306, *affd*67 NY2d 681; *People v McCullough,*73 AD2d 310).

Finally, viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the People, a rational trier of fact could properly have found *321the essential elements of the crime of murder in the second degree beyond a reasonable doubt *(see, Jackson v Virginia,*443 US 307, 319). Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Jimenez, Also Known as William Cruz, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Sherman, J.), rendered December 8, 1982, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree, and possession of burglar’s tools, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the appeal is held in abeyance, John J. Marotta is relieved as attorney for the defendant, the brief filed by him is deemed stricken, George Dunn of 60 East 42nd Street, Suite 1166, New York, New York, 10170, is hereby substituted as the defendant’s counsel and is directed to serve and file a brief in accordance herewith on or before October 15, 1987, and the respondent shall serve and file a supplemental brief on or before October 29, 1987.

Assigned counsel submitted a brief on behalf of the defendant in which he stated that "this appeal is without merit” prior to affirmatively arguing the only point which his client requested be raised on the appeal. As the Court of Appeals noted in its recent decision in *People v Vasquez*(70 NY2d 1, 4), counsel thereby disparaged the claim his client wanted addressed and "for all practical purposes, precluded his client [if he was so advised] from presenting [it] effectively in a *pro se*brief’. Accordingly, new counsel must be assigned and consideration of the appeal deferred until the filing of further briefs. Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Rubin, Kunzeman and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
#### Ophelia Kweh, as Guardian of the Person and Property of John Kweh and Another, Respondent, v Christopher C. Edmunds et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant. (Action No. 1.) Ophelia Kweh, as Administratrix of the Estate of Sampson Kweh, Deceased, Respondent, v Christopher C. Edmunds et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant. (Action No. 2.) Philip Kweh, Respondent, v Christopher C. Edmunds et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant. (Action No. 3.) Kadra Dayow, as Administratrix of the Estate of Mohamed Dayow, Deceased, Respondent, v Ophelia Kweh, as Administratrix of the Estate of Juty Kweh, Deceased, Defendant, and Patrick D. Sampson et al., Appellants. (Action No. 4.) Kadra Dayow, as Administratrix of the Estate of Mohamed Dayow, Deceased, Respondent, v Skinner Sales, Inc., Appellant. (Action No. 5.)

[945 NYS2d 588]

Motion for reargument or leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Scudder, P.J., Centra, Carni, Bindley and Martoche, JJ.
Exhibit 7
   
  Ref.: 1808.17590
   March 23, 2010
 
  Canadian Natural Resources Limited
 2500, 855 Second Street SW
 Calgary AB T2P 4J8
   Re:  Consent of Independent Petroleum Consultants
  To Whom It May Concern:
  We consent to the use of our report with respect to the reserves data of Canadian Natural Resources Limited incorporated by reference in its
  (i)
Annual Report (Form 40-F) for the year ended December 31, 2009.
  (ii)
Registration Statement on Form F-9 (File No. 333-162270), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
   Sincerely,



SPROULE ASSOCIATES LIMITED







Harry J. Helwerda, P.Eng.

Executive Vice-President
  Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  HJH:paob
 W:\1808\17590\consent\HJH 03-23-10B.doc
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6068
STEPHEN M. CHRZAN, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FRANKLIN FREEMAN; AARON JOHNSON; MARTIN J. MCDADE; MARVIN SPARROW, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Joseph C. Howard, District Judge. (CA-95-846-5-H) Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 4, 1996 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stephen M. Chrzan, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Chrzan v. Freeman , No. CA-95-846-5-H (E.D.N.C. Dec. 11, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Storage                    
csv

      Inflow                    
csv

      Total Release                    
csv

      Pool Elevation                    
csv

      Evaporation                    
csv

      Release Volume                    
csv

      Area                    
csv

      Delta Storage                    
csv

      Inflow Volume                    
csv

#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Storage                    
json

      Inflow                    
json

      Total Release                    
json

      Pool Elevation                    
json

      Evaporation                    
json

      Release Volume                    
json

      Area                    
json

      Delta Storage                    
json

      Inflow Volume                    
json
(June 14, 2012)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alberto DeLuna, Appellant.

[946 NYS2d 857]

— Upon remittitur from the Court of Appeals (19 NY3d 842 [2012]) judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert M. Stolz, J.), rendered on or about February 23, 2010, unanimously affirmed.

We find that the sentence was not excessive. Concur— Andrias, J.P., Sweeny, Renwick, Freedman and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 178 (Friday, September 17, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51879-51880]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-20116]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Designation of Performance Review Board Standing Register.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice provides the Performance Review Board Standing 
Register for the Department of Energy. This listing supersedes all 
previously published lists of PRB members.

DATES: This appointment is effective as of September 9, 2021.

Anderson, Sonja
Black, Steven

[[Page 51880]]

Boston, Robert
Debeauclair, Geoffrey
Flohr, Connie
Isom, Pamela
Johnson Jr., Thomas
Kim, Dong
Klausing, Kathleen
Konieczny, Katherine
Kremer, Kevin
Lee, Terri
Marlay, Robert
Monroe, Lewis
Nicoll, Eric
O'Konski, Peter
Rodgers, Jami
Satyapal, Sunita
West, William

Signing Authority

    This document of the Department of Energy was signed on September 
9, 2021, by Farhana Hossain, Acting Director for Office of Corporate 
Executive Management, Office of the Chief Human Capital Officer, 
pursuant to delegated authority from the Secretary of Energy. That 
document with the original signature and date is maintained by DOE. For 
administrative purposes only, and in compliance with requirements of 
the Office of the Federal Register, the undersigned DOE Federal 
Register Liaison Officer has been authorized to sign and submit the 
document in electronic format for publication as an official document 
of the Department of Energy. This administrative process in no way 
alters the legal effect of this document upon publication in the 
Federal Register.

    Signed in Washington, DC, on September 14, 2021.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S. Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2021-20116 Filed 9-16-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

 

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, StephenForsyth, Chief Executive Officer of Medicsight, Inc. (the “Company”), certify,pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of theCompany for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2)    the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|          | By:    | /s/ STEPHEN FORSYTH     |   |
|---------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|          |   | Stephen Forsyth         |
|          |   | Chief Executive Officer |
|          |   |                    |
| April 8, 2004 |   |                    |

 

----
OWRD 11495900 - N FK SPRAGUE R AB SRIC CN NR BLYLatitude: 42.497Longitude: -121.007Elevation: None

OWRD 11495900 - N Fk Sprague R Ab Sric Cn Nr Bly

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Crazyman Flat Site Page...



Crazyman Flat

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Quartz Mountain Site Page...



Quartz Mountain

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Summer Rim Site Page...



Summer Rim
#### Affoue Mamousso KOUROUMA, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Respondent.

No. 06-2095.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 25, 2007.

Decided: May 23, 2007.

Randall L. Johnson, Johnson & Associates, P.C., Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Office of Immigration Litigation, Gregory M. Kelch, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Affoue Mamousso Kourouma, a native and citizen of the Ivory Coast, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) affirming the decision of the immigration judge denying her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture.*

*289Kourouma seeks to challenge the immigration judge’s finding that she failed to file her asylum application within one year of the date of her arrival in the United States, or to establish changed or extraordinary circumstances excusing timely filing. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(2)(B), (C) (2000). We conclude that we lack jurisdiction to review this determination pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(3) (2000). *See Zaidi v. Ashcroft,*377 F.3d 678, 680-81 (7th Cir.2004) (collecting cases). Given this jurisdictional bar, we cannot review the underlying merits of Kourouma’s asylum claim.

We retain jurisdiction, however, to consider the denial of Kourouma’s request for withholding of removal. *See 8*C.F.R. § 1208.4(a) (2006). “To qualify for withholding of removal, a petitioner must show that [s]he faces a clear probability of persecution because of h[er] race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.” *Rusu v. INS,*296 F.3d 316, 324 n. 13 (4th Cir.2002) (citing *INS v. Stevie,*467 U.S. 407, 430, 104 S.Ct. 2489, 81 L.Ed.2d 321 (1984)). Based on our review of the record, we find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s holding that Kourouma failed to meet this standard.

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*

*

 Kourouma does not challenge in this appeal the denial of protection under the Convention Against Torture, and therefore has abandoned that claim. *Yousefi v. INS,*260 F.3d 318, 326 (4th Cir.2001).
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2159 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2159

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend for one year the 
                 credit for energy-efficient new homes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 30, 2015

 Mr. Grayson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend for one year the 
                 credit for energy-efficient new homes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF CREDIT FOR ENERGY-EFFICIENT NEW HOMES.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (g) of section 45L of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``December 31, 2014'' and 
inserting ``December 31, 2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to homes acquired after December 31, 2014.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 179 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 179

To amend the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 to reduce the rates 
 of pay of Members of Congress by 5 percent and eliminate future cost-
              of-living adjustments in such rates of pay.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 2015

  Mr. Yoder introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on 
   Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 to reduce the rates 
 of pay of Members of Congress by 5 percent and eliminate future cost-
              of-living adjustments in such rates of pay.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Congressional Pay Reduction Act''.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION IN RATES OF PAY AND ELIMINATION OF FUTURE COST-OF-
              LIVING ADJUSTMENTS FOR MEMBERS OF CONGRESS.

    Section 601(a) of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 
U.S.C. 4501) is amended by amending paragraph (2) to read as follows:
    ``(2) Effective with respect to pay periods beginning after the 
date of the regularly scheduled general election for Federal office 
held in November 2016, the annual rate of pay for each of the positions 
described in paragraph (1) shall be equal to 95 percent of the annual 
rate of pay for such position for the most recent pay period preceding 
such election.''.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2009033EN.01004901.xml

| 3.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 33/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 33/49

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 85/2009 of 19 January 2009 amending Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund concerning certain provisions relating to financial management

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 25 of 29 January 2009
  )

The text of Council Regulation (EC) No 85/2009, published in the
  Official Journal of the European Union L 25 of 29 January 2009, p. 1, should be considered as null and void.

Official Journal of the European Union

---