alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

Informational Addendum to Report on Form 10-Q

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

Not Filed Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

The undersigned Chief Financial Officer of OYO Geospace Corporation does hereby certify as follows:

Solely for the purpose of meeting the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and solely to the extent this certification may
be applicable to this Report on Form 10-Q, the undersigned hereby certify that this Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in this
Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OYO Geospace Corporation.



/s/ Thomas T. McEntireName:

Thomas T. McEntireTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerFebruary 6, 2007
# L_2009155EN.01001401.xml

| 18.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 155/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 155/14

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 519/2009

of 17 June 2009

establishing that certain limits for issuing import licences for sugar products under tariff quotas and preferential agreements are no longer reached

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 950/2006 of 28 June 2006 laying down detailed rules of application for the 2006/07, 2007/08 and 2008/09 marketing years for the import and refining of sugar products under certain tariff quotas and preferential agreements (2), and in particular Article 5(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The records referred to in Article 5(2) of Regulation (EC) No 950/2006 show that quantities of sugar are still available for the obligations laid down under Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 950/2006 bearing the serial numbers 09.4332, 09.4337, 09.4341, 09.4343, 09.4346 and 09.4351 (2008-2009). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The records referred to in Article 5(2) of Regulation (EC) No 950/2006 show that quantities of sugar are still available for the obligations laid down under Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 950/2006 bearing the serial numbers 09.4332, 09.4337, 09.4341, 09.4343, 09.4346 and 09.4351 (2008-2009).

| (2) | Under these circumstances, the Commission must indicate that the limits concerned are no longer reached, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Under these circumstances, the Commission must indicate that the limits concerned are no longer reached,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The limits for the obligations laid down under Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 950/2006 bearing the serial numbers 09.4332, 09.4337, 09.4341, 09.4343, 09.4346 and 09.4351 (2008-2009) are no longer reached.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 18 June 2009.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 June 2009.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 178, 1.7.2006, p. 1.

2

---
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 14, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 51217]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19769]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN COMMISSION


Projects Approved for Minor Modifications

AGENCY: Susquehanna River Basin Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice lists the minor modifications approved for a 
previously approved project by the Susquehanna River Basin Commission 
during the period set forth in DATES.

DATES: August 1-31, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Susquehanna River Basin Commission, 4423 North Front Street, 
Harrisburg, PA 17110-1788.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jason E. Oyler, General Counsel, 
telephone: (717) 238-0423, ext. 1312; fax: (717) 238-2436; email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9ff5f0e6f3faeddfecedfdfcb1f1faeb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6c06031500091e2c1f1e0e0f42020918">[email protected]</span></a>. Regular mail inquiries may be sent to the above 
address.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice lists previously approved 
projects, receiving approval of minor modifications, described below, 
pursuant to 18 CFR 806.18 or to Commission Resolution Nos. 2013-11 and 
2015-06 for the time period specified above:

Minor Modification Issued Under 18 CFR 806.18

    1. Seneca Resources Company, LLC, Docket No. 20210611, Sergeant and 
Norwich Townships, McKean County, Pa.; approval authorizing the 
additional water use purpose for hydrostatic testing; Approval Date: 
August 18, 2021.
    Authority: Public Law 91-575, 84 Stat. 1509 et seq., 18 CFR parts 
806, 807, and 808.

    Dated: September 9, 2021.
Jason E. Oyler,
General Counsel and Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2021-19769 Filed 9-13-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7040-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6026

JOSEPH JOHNSON, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CHARLES LEWIS KING,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District

Judge. (CA-98-1368-A)

Submitted: May 25, 2000 Decided: June 5, 2000

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Johnson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Charles Lewis King,

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Johnson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action as frivolous. We have reviewed the record

and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Johnson v. King, No. CA-98-1368-A (E.D. Va. Dec. 9, 1999). We deny

Johnson’s motion to supplement the record on appeal and dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the quarterly report of Classic Bancshares, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David B. Barbour, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.




Date: February 14, 2005                  /s/ David B. Barbour
      -----------------------            -------------------------------------
                                         David B. Barbour
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2021241EN.01000101.xml

| 21.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 241/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 241/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10203 — PSA/Felbermayr/PSA Breakbulk/Coil Terminal)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 241/01)

On 11 June 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10203. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10203. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00257-CV

In re Michael Ndubuisi Agwuncha and Maureen Obiageli Agwuncha

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

__________________________________________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Goodwin and Field

Filed: May 2, 2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                  2,771,987
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                             690,084
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                               332,855
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        3,794,927
<PP&E>                                  2,898,624
<DEPRECIATION>                            921,329
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         20,972,736
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   1,784,858
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                             3,938,800
<COMMON>                                    8,967
<OTHER-SE>                              9,598,104
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           20,972,736
<SALES>                                 1,666,583
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        1,666,583
<CGS>                                     664,526
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           1,581,674
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          758,462
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         95,686
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            84,909
<INCOME-TAX>                               84,909
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             0
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               84,909
<EPS-BASIC>                                   .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 .01



</TABLE>
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2021330EN.01000701.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 17.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 330/7 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10261 — USTC/CM Biomass Partners)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 330/06)

1.

On 10 August 2021, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2021330EN.01000701-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | United Shipping & Trading Company (‘USTC’, Denmark), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | CM Holding (‘CM’, Denmark), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | CM Biomass Partners (Denmark). |

USTC and CM acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and Article 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the whole of CM Biomass Partners.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for USTC: active in global risk management, terminal and stevedoring services, freight forwarding, bunker, oil and chemical tankers, and IT, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for CM: active within brokerage, shipping, logistics, terminals, and superintendence. CM is the majority shareholder of CM Biomass Partners, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for CM Biomass Partners: supply of physical wood pellets and other biomass products, mainly supplied to European utilities and distributors. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2021330EN.01000701-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10261 — USTC/CM Biomass Partners

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2021330EN.01000701-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2021330EN.01000701-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
#### James L. BARNHOUSE, Plaintiff, v. PETROLITE CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.

Civ. A. No. V-88-42.

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Victoria Division.

Aug. 23, 1988.

As Amended Dec. 28, 1988.

Jim Cole, Cole McManus Cole Easley & Bell, P.C., Victoria, Tex., for plaintiff.

O. F. Jones, III, Victoria, Tex., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KAZEN, District Judge.

Presently pending before the Court is the Plaintiff’s motion to remand. This case was initially filed in the District Court of Victoria County, Texas on March 3, 1986. The Plaintiff’s Original Petition sought recovery of retirement benefits allegedly due him under an ERISA qualified retirement plan. The state district court has jurisdiction over a civil action brought by an ERISA plan beneficiary to recover benefits due to him under the terms of his *17plan. 29 U.S.C. § 1132(e)(1). The Plaintiff subsequently filed two amended petitions, the second adding causes of action based on fraud and misrepresentation. All three pleadings clearly invoked ERISA. After receiving answers to interrogatories relating to the Second Amended Petition, the Defendant removed this case to this Court, ostensibly on the grounds of diversity of citizenship.

A petition for removal normally must be filed within thirty (30) days from receipt of a copy of the initial pleading setting forth the claim for relief upon which the case is based. 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b). In the event that the original pleading does not indicate that the case is removable, a petition for removal may be filed within thirty (30) days after receipt of an amended pleading from which it may be first ascertained that the case is one which is or has become removable. *Id.*This case was patently removable from the time the Plaintiff filed his original petition in state court. The ERISA statute confers concurrent jurisdiction on the state and federal courts in civil actions brought by a plan’s beneficiary to recover benefits due to him under the terms of the plan. 29 U.S.C. § 1132(e)(1). The defendant may not wait over two years and then seek removal on the basis of the Plaintiff’s Second Amended Petition. An amendment of pleadings will not revive the period for removal if the case was previously removable, but the defendant failed to exercise his right to remove. *Wilson v. Intercollegiate (Big 10) Conference Athletic Association,*668 F.2d 962, 966 (7th Cir.1982), *cert. denied,*459 U.S. 831, 103 S.Ct. 70, 74 L.Ed.2d 70 (1982). Since the original complaint indicated that the action was removable, the Defendant’s petition for removal filed on July 26, 1988 is not timely. Plaintiff’s motion to remand is GRANTED.
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2209 

AN ACT 

To require the appropriate Federal banking agencies to treat 

certain municipal obligations as level 2A liquid assets, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2209 EH

1 SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN MUNICIPAL OBLIGA2 TIONS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 18 of the Federal Deposit 

4 Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1828) is amended— 

5 (1) by moving subsection (z) so that it appears 

6 after subsection (y); and 

7 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(aa) TREATMENT OF CERTAIN MUNICIPAL OBLIGA9 TIONS.— 

10 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of the final 

11 rule titled ‘Liquidity Coverage Ratio: Liquidity Risk 

12 Measurement Standards; Final Rule’ (79 Fed. Reg. 

13 61439; published October 10, 2014) (the ‘Final 

14 Rule’) and any other regulation which incorporates 

15 a definition of the term ‘high-quality liquid asset’, 

16 the appropriate Federal banking agencies shall treat 

17 a municipal obligation that is both liquid and readily 

18 marketable (as defined in the Final Rule) and in19 vestment grade as of the calculation date as a high20 quality liquid asset that is a level 2A liquid asset. 

21 ‘‘(2) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this sub22 section: 

23 ‘‘(A) INVESTMENT GRADE.—With respect 

24 to an obligation, the term ‘investment grade’ 

25 has the meaning given that term under part 1 

26 of title 12, Code of Federal Regulations. 
3 

•HR 2209 EH

1 ‘‘(B) MUNICIPAL OBLIGATION.—The term 

2 ‘municipal obligation’ means an obligation of a 

3 State or any political subdivision thereof, or any 

4 agency or instrumentality of a State or any po5 litical subdivision thereof.’’. 

6 (b) AMENDMENT TO LIQUIDITY COVERAGE RATIO

7 REGULATIONS.—Not later than the end of the 3-month 

8 period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, 

9 the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Board of 

10 Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and the Comp11 troller of the Currency shall amend the final rule titled 

12 ‘‘Liquidity Coverage Ratio: Liquidity Risk Measurement 

13 Standards; Final Rule’’ (79 Fed. Reg. 61439; published 

14 October 10, 2014) to implement the amendments made 

15 by this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 1, 

2016. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2209 

AN ACT 

To require the appropriate Federal banking agen2A liquid assets, and for other purposes. cies to treat certain municipal obligations as level
ROCKY ARROYO AT HIGHWAY BRIDGE NEAR LAKEWOODLatitude: 32.506Longitude: -104.375Elevation: 3258

ROCKY ARROYO AT HIGHWAY BRIDGE NEAR LAKEWOOD
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          12,233
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  722,687
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    114,927
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,116,787
<PP&E>                                       1,249,210
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,972,755
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,038,399
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        36,963
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1,835)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,972,755
<SALES>                                      3,134,868
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,134,868
<CGS>                                        1,958,712
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,051,126
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             127,017
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (15,872)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (16,672)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (16,672)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.000)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.000)


</TABLE>