alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. Department of the Interior

U.S. Geological Survey

Recent advances in population modeling, 

preliminary estimates, and their relevance to 

BO triggers

Charles B. Yackulic

U.S. Geological Survey, Southwest Biological Science Center, Grand Canyon Monitoring and 

Research Center
Outline

 Review of timing of HBC sampling in and 

near LCR

 Comparison of methods used for HBC 

population assessment

 Multistate modeling of HBC – background

 Multistate modeling – preliminary results

 BO triggers
Monthly schedule

P

x X X X

Little Colorado River

Colorado River
Method Scale Strengths Weaknesses

Closed models Depends Fairly straightforward. Biases can not always be

addressed, (e.g., population 

closure).

Open models Between trips Not affected by within trip 

behavioral response. 

Estimates of survival and N 

not available for last time 

period. 
Method Scale Strengths Weaknesses

Closed models Depends Fairly straightforward. Biases can not always be

addressed, (e.g., population 

closure).

Open models Between trips Not affected by within trip 

behavioral response. 

Estimates of survival and N 

not available for last time 

period. 

ASMR / SSMR Time step: 

Annual

Spatial 

structure: No

Estimate parameters even 

when data is sparse.

Assumes homogeneous 

population; 

Parametric assumptions; 

Well-known biases. 
Method Scale Strengths Weaknesses

Closed models Depends Fairly straightforward. Biases can not always be

addressed, (e.g., population 

closure).

Open models Between trips Not affected by within trip 

behavioral response. 

Estimates of survival and N 

not available for last time 

period. 

ASMR / SSMR Time step: 

Annual

Spatial 

structure: No

Estimate parameters even 

when data is sparse.

Assumes homogeneous 

population; 

Parametric assumptions; 

Well-known biases. 

Multistate

models

Time step:

Monthly (trips)

Spatial 

structure: Yes

Includes tag loss; 

Heterogeneity in rates over 

space and within year; 

Movement.

Relatively data hungry; 

Assumes NSE 

representative of CR.
Multistate Model - Background

 3 spatial locations (LCR, NSE, rest of CR)

 3 Size groups (4-10cm; 10-20cm; 20cm<)

 Incorporates information from tag loss 

studies.

 Assumes CR fish don’t move around much,

 Assumes that NSE is representative.
Multistate Model - Background


Size Transitions
Movement
Survival
Mainstem

LCR


State specific abundances
Abundance over 20 cm
BO triggers

 Adult humpback chub <7000 fish

 OR

 ALL 3

 LCR pop of ~size class 2 <910 fish

 Temperature <12° C for 2 consecutive years

 Survival of size class 1 in JCM drops 25% from 

preceding year
BO triggers

 AND

 Rainbow trout abundance over 760 

 Korman closed model estimates ~450 (330-600)

 Open models?

 AND

 Brown trout abundance over 50

 Unknown – 8 total fish caught 
Acknowledgements

 US – Fish and Wildlife Service

 Bill Pine and NSE group

 Mike Yard, Lew Coggins, Josh Korman

 Jim Hines and Jim Nichols

 Arizona Game and Fish

 National Park Service

 Bureau of Reclamation

 Navajo Nation Department of Fish and 

Wildlife
#### Carmine N. Pagano, Appellant, v Pasquale J. Malpeso, D.M.D., et al., Respondents.

[946 NYS2d 475]

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan B. Lobis, J.), entered May 19, 2011, dismissing the action pursuant to an order which, inter alia, granted defendants’ motion to strike the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the action based on pro se plaintiff’s pattern of disobeying court orders and failing to provide discovery *(see*CPLR 3126 [3]; *Arts4All, Ltd. v Hancock,*54 AD3d 286, 287 [2008], *affd*12 NY3d 846 [2009], *cert denied*559 US —, 130 S Ct 1301 [2010]).

We have considered plaintiffs remaining arguments and find them unavailing. In addition, defendants did not appeal from that portion of the court’s prior order denying sanctions, and, in any event, sanctions are unwarranted. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, DeGrasse, Richter and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

Motion to compel production of deposition tapes denied.
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion on Rehearing 18A-CT-2883 | September 12, 2019 Page 1 of 2

OPINION ON REHEARING

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT

Daniel H. Pfeifer

James P. Barth

Jeffrey J. Stesiak

South Bend, Indiana

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE

Robert J. Palmer

Mishawaka, Indiana

IN THE

COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

Linda Martinez, as the Personal 

Representative of the Estate of 

Roy Martinez,

Appellant-Plaintiff,

v.

Oaklawn Psychiatric Center, 

Inc.,

Appellee-Defendant.

September 12, 2019

Court of Appeals Case No.

18A-CT-2883

Appeal from the St. Joseph 

Superior Court

The Honorable Jenny Pitts Manier, 

Judge

Trial Court Cause No.

71D05-1803-CT-140

Mathias, Judge.

[1] Linda Martinez, as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Roy Martinez, 

has filed a petition for rehearing, which we grant for the limited purpose of 

clarifying our July 12, 2019 opinion.
[2] In her petition, Martinez claims that there is a genuine issue of material fact 

concerning whether Roy Martinez or Kennedy Kafatia began the physical 

altercation that resulted in Roy’s death. We agree that this fact is disputed, 

however, it is not material to our conclusion that the Estate’s claim falls within 

the scope of the Medical Malpractice Act. 

[3] Subject to this clarification, we affirm our opinion in all other respects.

Robb, J., and Altice, J., concur.
NRCS 344 - BILLIE CREEK DIVIDELatitude: 42.407Longitude: -122.266Elevation: None

NRCS 344 - Billie Creek Divide

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Billie Creek Divide Site Page...



Billie Creek Divide

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Cold Springs Camp Site Page...



Cold Springs Camp

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Fish Lk. Site Page...



Fish Lk.

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Fourmile Lake Site Page...



Fourmile Lake
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JOHNNIE F. HOWARD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D23-1254

December 13, 2023

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Mark D. Kiser, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SLEET, C.J., and KELLY and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Whitewing Environmental Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned certifies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of the
undersigned's knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition, results of operations,
            and cash flows of the Company.

11/19/02                                /s/ Andrew V. Latham
--------                                ----------------------------------------
Date                                    President and Chief Executive Officer

11/19/02                                /s/ Charles J. Stuto
--------                                ----------------------------------------
Date                                    Principal Financial Officer
# L_2009258EN.01000401.xml

| 1.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 258/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 258/4

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 914/2009

of 30 September 2009

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in particular Article 138(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 October 2009.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 September 2009.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.

2

---

ANNEX

Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

| (EUR/100 kg) |
| --- |
| CN code | Third country code (1) | Standard import value |
| 0702 00 00 | MK | 27,4 |
| ZZ | 27,4 |
| 0707 00 05 | TR | 114,4 |
| ZZ | 114,4 |
| 0709 90 70 | TR | 110,1 |
| ZZ | 110,1 |
| 0805 50 10 | AR | 56,9 |
| CL | 103,4 |
| TR | 64,9 |
| UY | 88,0 |
| ZA | 75,8 |
| ZZ | 77,8 |
| 0806 10 10 | EG | 109,7 |
| TR | 98,0 |
| US | 190,3 |
| ZZ | 132,7 |
| 0808 10 80 | BR | 83,8 |
| CL | 85,7 |
| NZ | 75,7 |
| US | 83,8 |
| ZA | 73,5 |
| ZZ | 80,5 |
| 0808 20 50 | AR | 81,8 |
| CN | 48,7 |
| TR | 101,8 |
| US | 161,5 |
| ZA | 70,1 |
| ZZ | 92,8 |

(EUR/100 kg)

CN code

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

0702 00 00

MK

27,4

ZZ

27,4

0707 00 05

TR

114,4

ZZ

114,4

0709 90 70

TR

110,1

ZZ

110,1

0805 50 10

AR

56,9

CL

103,4

TR

64,9

UY

88,0

ZA

75,8

ZZ

77,8

0806 10 10

EG

109,7

TR

98,0

US

190,3

ZZ

132,7

0808 10 80

BR

83,8

CL

85,7

NZ

75,7

US

83,8

ZA

73,5

ZZ

80,5

0808 20 50

AR

81,8

CN

48,7

TR

101,8

US

161,5

ZA

70,1

ZZ

92,8

---

(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
  ZZ
  ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

---
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Sunterra Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the transition period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacity and as of the date indicated
below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                
|------------------------------------------------
|/s/    STEVEN E.
WESTSTEVEN E. WEST             
|Chief Financial Officer Dated: December 14,
2004
| datetime   | inflow volume |
|------------|---------------|
| 2021-01-01 | 0.0           |
| 2021-01-02 | 0.0           |
| 2021-01-03 | 0.0           |
| 2021-01-04 | 0.0           |
| 2021-01-05 | 0.0           |
| 2021-01-06 | 0.0           |
| 2021-01-07 | 0.0           |
| 2021-01-08 | 0.0           |
| 2021-01-09 | 0.0           |
| 2021-01-10 | 0.0           |
| 2021-01-11 | 0.0           |
# C_2021032EN.01001301.xml

| 29.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/13

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10130—APG/Arcus/PSP/Alpha Trains)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 32/10)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | APG Asset Management N.V. (‘APG’, Netherlands); |
| --- | --- |

—

APG Asset Management N.V. (‘APG’, Netherlands);

| — | Arcus European Investment Manager LLP (‘Arcus’, United Kingdom); |
| --- | --- |

—

Arcus European Investment Manager LLP (‘Arcus’, United Kingdom);

| — | Public Sector Pension Investment Board (‘PSP’, Canada); and |
| --- | --- |

—

Public Sector Pension Investment Board (‘PSP’, Canada); and

| — | Alpha Trains (Luxembourg) Holdings S.à.r.l. (‘Alpha Trains’, Luxembourg). |
| --- | --- |

—

Alpha Trains (Luxembourg) Holdings S.à.r.l. (‘Alpha Trains’, Luxembourg).

APG, Arcus and PSP acquire within the meaning of Articles 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of Alpha Trains.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | for APG: asset manager with global investments on behalf of Dutch pension funds; |
| --- | --- |

—

for APG: asset manager with global investments on behalf of Dutch pension funds;

| — | for Arcus: independent fund manager specialising in European infrastructure; |
| --- | --- |

—

for Arcus: independent fund manager specialising in European infrastructure;

| — | for PSP: pension investment manager with a diversified global portfolio; |
| --- | --- |

—

for PSP: pension investment manager with a diversified global portfolio;

| — | for Alpha Trains: specialist train leasing company providing rolling stock to both public and priate operators in a number of countries across continental Europe. |
| --- | --- |

—

for Alpha Trains: specialist train leasing company providing rolling stock to both public and priate operators in a number of countries across continental Europe.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10130—APG/Arcus/PSP/Alpha Trains

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHRISTOPHER GLEN GREER,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 420 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 18th day of April, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
#### Eric Parker, Appellant, v Mobil Oil Corporation et al., Respondents. (And Third-Party Actions.)

Submitted December 4, 2006;

decided January 9, 2007

Motion for reargument denied *[see*7 NY3d 434].
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Asta Funding, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Mitchell Herman, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the
            Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of
            operations of the Company for the periods presented.

Dated: August 10, 2004


                                                        /s/ Mitchell Herman
                                                        -------------------
                                                        Mitchell Herman
                                                        Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Asta Funding, Inc. and will be retained by Asta Funding, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



                                       24
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 Title 18,

United States Code)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of R&G Financial Corporation, a Puerto Rico corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such
officers knowledge, that:

The amended 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (the Form 10-K/A) of the Company fully complies with the
requirements of section l3(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |     |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 2, 2007 |  |     |  |                                      
|                       |  | By: |  | /s/ Rolando Rodríguez                
|                       |  |     |  | Rolando Rodríguez                    
|                       |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies this Form 10-K/A pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to, and will be retained by, the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2021403EN.01000101.xml

| 6.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 403/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 403/1

---

RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

of 29 September 2021

to the Council of the European Union on the external auditors of the Central Bank of Ireland

(ECB/2021/44)

(2021/C 403/01)

THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Article 27.1 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and national central banks of the Member States whose currency is the euro are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB’s Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and national central banks of the Member States whose currency is the euro are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB’s Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union.

| (2) | In 2016, the Central Bank of Ireland selected Mazars as its external auditors for the financial years 2016 to 2020. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In 2016, the Central Bank of Ireland selected Mazars as its external auditors for the financial years 2016 to 2020.

| (3) | The mandate of the Central Bank of Ireland’s current external auditors, Mazars, ended after the audit for the financial year 2020. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors for the financial years 2021 and 2022. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The mandate of the Central Bank of Ireland’s current external auditors, Mazars, ended after the audit for the financial year 2020. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors for the financial years 2021 and 2022.

| (4) | The Central Bank of Ireland intends to extend the mandate of Mazars for the financial years 2021 and 2022, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The Central Bank of Ireland intends to extend the mandate of Mazars for the financial years 2021 and 2022,

HAS ADOPTED THIS RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that Mazars should be appointed as the external auditors of the Central Bank of Ireland for the financial years 2021 and 2022.

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 29 September 2021.

The President of the ECB

Christine LAGARDE

---