alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906

 

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002

 

I, Tim Paterson-Brown, Chief Executive Officer ofMedicsight, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the bestof my knowledge:

 

(1)    theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly periodended June 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirementsof  Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2)    theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/  TIM PATERSON-BROWN  |   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Tim  Paterson-Brown      |   |
|   |   | Chief  Executive Officer |   |

August 11, 2005

 

E-3

----
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Marc M. Hazout certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2014, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in such Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of Silver Dragon
Resources Inc.

Dated: November 2, 2015

|/s/ Marc M.
      Hazout                   | 
|------------------------------------------ | 
|Marc M. Hazout                             | 
|President and Chief Executive Officer      | 
|Principal Financial and Accounting Officer | 

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2248 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2248

To provide that service of the members of the organization known as the 
United States Cadet Nurse Corps during World War II constituted active 
military service for purposes of laws administered by the Secretary of 
                           Veterans Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 2015

Mrs. Lowey (for herself, Mr. Lance, Ms. DeLauro, Mr. Rooney of Florida, 
Ms. Bordallo, Mr. Ryan of Ohio, Mr. Polis, and Ms. McCollum) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
  Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a 
 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide that service of the members of the organization known as the 
United States Cadet Nurse Corps during World War II constituted active 
military service for purposes of laws administered by the Secretary of 
                           Veterans Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``United States Cadet Nurse Corps 
Equity Act''.

SEC. 2. SERVICE DEEMED TO BE ACTIVE MILITARY SERVICE.

    (a) In General.--For purposes of section 401(a)(1)(A) of the GI 
Bill Improvement Act of 1977 (38 U.S.C. 106 note), the Secretary of 
Defense is deemed to have determined that qualified service of a person 
constituted active military service.
    (b) Determination of Discharge Status.--The Secretary of Defense 
shall issue an honorable discharge under section 401(a)(1)(B) of the GI 
Bill Improvement Act of 1977 to each person whose qualified service 
warrants an honorable discharge. Such discharge shall be issued before 
the end of the one-year period beginning on the date of the enactment 
of this Act.

SEC. 3. PROHIBITION OF RETROACTIVE BENEFITS.

    No benefits may be paid to any person as a result of the enactment 
of this Act for any period before the date of the enactment of this 
Act.

SEC. 4. DEFINITION.

    For purposes of this Act, the term ``qualified service'' means 
service of a person as a member of the organization known as the United 
States Cadet Nurse Corps during the period beginning on July 1, 1943, 
and ending on December 15, 1945.
                                 <all>
```
datetime,flow volume2015-05-20,2243.38843
Exhibit 32.1



STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF

TG THERAPEUTICS, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In
connection with Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report of TG Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Michael S. Weiss,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



1) 	The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2) The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date:May 15, 2012 | /s/ Michael S. Weiss                                              | 
|----------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                  | Michael S. Weiss                                                 
|                  | Executive Chairman, Interim Chief Executive Officer and President
|                  | Principal Executive Officer
WRDO - WORDENLatitude: 42.013Longitude: -121.787Elevation: None

WRDO - Worden
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




            In connection with the quarterly report of Classic Bancshares, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David B. Barbour, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: November 12, 2004                  /s/ David B. Barbour
                                         ----------------------------
                                         David B. Barbour
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer
#### McDOWELL, Respondent, v. DECKER et al., Appellants (two cases).

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 12, 1897.)

Actions' by John McDowell against John P. Decker, James Kerr and Abigail J. Decker.

No opinion. Motion to dismiss appeal denied, without costs, with leave to renew the same upon the hearing of the appeal from the judgment.
#### BOLTANSKY et al., Appellants, v. STERN, Respondent.

(Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.

April 26, 1894.)

Appeal from fifth district court.

Action by Joseph Boltansky and another against Anna Stern.

Argued before BOOKSTAVER and BISCHOFF, JJ.

E. T. Goldberg, for appellants.

E. F. Stem, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Skip to main content

Privacy Policy•Site map

# Courthouse

The Clerk's Office is Open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
                                    - Courtroom Technology
                                    - Directory
                                    - Hours of Operations/Directions
                                    - Courtroom Decorum

Howard T. Markey National Courts Building • 717 Madison Place, NW, Washington, DC 20439 • 202-357-6400
##### 



Exhibit 21.1
 Subsidiaries of the Company
 The following is a list of LCC International, Inc.'s subsidiaries.
Where LCC International, Inc. directly or indirectly (through one or more subsidiaries) owns
less than 100% of the outstanding interests of the subsidiary, such percentage ownership
has been noted.  Jurisdiction ofName
of Subsidiary
    
    Incorporation or OrganizationLCC Wireless Services, Inc.
    
    DelawareLCC Design Services, L.L.C.
    
    DelawareLCC Wireless Design Services, L.L.C.
    
    DelawareLCC do Brasil Ltda.
    
    BrazilLCC Wireless Engineering Services, Ltd.
    
    United KingdomLCC Pakistan Private Ltd.
    
    IslamabadLCC United Kingdom, Ltd.
    
    United KingdomLCC Deployment Services UK Ltd.
    
    United KingdomLCC Southern Europe Holdings S.R.L.
    
    ItalyLCC Italia S.R.L.
    
    ItalyLCC Wireless Communications Espana, SA
    
    SpainDetron LCC Network Services, B.V.
    
    NetherlandsLCC International GmbH
    
    GermanyLCC Design and Deployment Services Ltd.
    
    GreeceLCC Middle East Holdings, Inc.
    
    DelawareLCC Middle East FZ-LLC
    
    DubaiLCC Detron Belgium NV
    
    BelgiumEURL LCC UK Algeria
    
    AlgeriaLCC Projects BV
    
    NetherlandsLCC Professionals BV
    
    NetherlandsLCC Fixed BV
    
    NetherlandsWireless Facilities International Limited
    
    United KingdomWFI France SARL
    
    FranceWireless Facilities Telekomunikasyon Servis Limited
    
    Turkey
#### In the Matter of Joseph Morlano, Appellant, v City of New York et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent New York City Department of Sanitation, dated April 23, 1985, which dismissed the petitioner from his position as a sanitation worker, and a determination of the Civil Service Commission of the City of New York, dated August 7, 1985, which affirmed the determination dated April 23, 1985, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bernstein, J.), entered June 19, 1986, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

On this record, it cannot be said that the Civil Service Commission’s affirmance of the petitioner’s dismissal was “purely arbitrary” *(see, Matter of City Council v Carbone,*54 AD2d 461, 467). In light of the petitioner’s record of nine prior violations, including one for the same infraction, dismissal for the instant offense is not “ ' “so disproportionate to the offense, in light of all the circumstances, as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness” ’ ” *(Matter of Pell v Board of Educ.,*34 NY2d 222, 233; *see, Matter of Short v Nassau County Civ. Serv. Commn.,*45 NY2d 721, 723). Mangano, J. P., Thompson, Lawrence and Harwood, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Mark
Westgate, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge, the Annual
Report of NexMed, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on
10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of NexMed, Inc.





Date:
      March 31, 2010.
                  By:
                  /s/ Mark WestgateName:
      Mark WestgateTitle:
      Chief Financial
Officer
Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center

Socio-cultural Resource Project Update -FY2000

Project Status

Photographic Terrace Monitoring On-going

PEP Project Completed

Southern Paiute Consortium

Educational Outreach On-going

Photographic Data Compilation On-going

CD ROM Data Migration On-going

Completion of Cultural Model and

Hands-on training workshop On-going
Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center

Socio-cultural Resource Project Update -FY2000

Project Status

Beach Synthesis On-going

Campsite Monitoring Protocols On-going

Adopt-a-beach On-going

Trout Satisfaction Data Compilation On-going
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**PERICOM
      SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION**





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with this quarterly report of Pericom Semiconductor Corporation
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 29, 2007 (the
“Report”), I, Angela Chen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
      certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
      Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
      knowledge:




(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and




(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
      and for the periods indicated.


December
              13, 2007
            By:
            /s/ Angela
              ChenAngela Chen
              Chief Financial OfficerPericom Semiconductor
              Corporation
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2021432EN.01000301.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 26.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 432/3 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10501 – Bouygues/Destia)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 432/03)

1.

On 15 October 2021, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2021432EN.01000301-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Colas SA (‘Colas’, France), controlled by Bouygues SA (‘Bouygues’, France); |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Destia Oy (‘Destia’, Finland). |

Colas acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Destia.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Bouygues is a French group active in construction, media and telecoms worldwide. Colas is a subsidiary of Bouygues active in transport infrastructure, construction and maintenance worldwide; |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Destia provides road and railway construction, earth and rock services, construction technology services, urban development and design services mainly in Finland. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2021432EN.01000301-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10501 – Bouygues/Destia

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2021432EN.01000301-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2021432EN.01000301-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Blount International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James S. Osterman,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(i)            The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the datesand for the periods expressed in the report.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to Blount International, Inc. and will be retained by BlountInternational, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

 

 
| Date:  May 9, 2006        |
|---------------------------|
|                      |
|                      |
| /s/ James S. Osterman     |   |
| James S. Osterman         |
| Chairman of the Board and |
| Chief Executive Officer   |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of Classic Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
David B. Barbour, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




Date:  February 12, 2004                   /s/ David B. Barbour
      -------------------                  -----------------------------
                                           David B. Barbour
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-10976

 

EARL RUSSELL BEHRINGER,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, Director,

Texas Department of

Criminal Justice,

Institutional Division,

Respondent-Appellee.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

 

February 5, 1996

Before GARWOOD, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Earl Russell Behringer seeks a stay of his execution scheduled

for February 15, 1996, and a certificate of probable cause to allow

his appeal from a denial of his application for a writ of habeas

corpus by the United States District Court for the Northern

District of Texas. We deny the request for stay of execution and

certificate of probable cause. 

This is Behringer’s first federal habeas petition. He

asserted five claims in his petition to the United States District

Court. Our question is whether Behringer has made a substantial
2

showing of the denial of a federal right in any of these five

claims:

(a) Whether Behringer was denied effective assistance

of counsel, his right to a trial by jury, and due

process by the trial court’s sua sponte excusal of

veniremembers David Wayne Wright, Doris Odle

Simmons, and Irma K. Warters in the absence of

Behringer and his counsel.

(b) Whether Behringer was denied due process of law and

subjected to cruel and unusual punishment by the

jury’s affirmative answer to special issue two

based on insufficient evidence.

(c) Whether Texas’ statutory scheme requiring direct

appeal of death penalty cases to the Texas Court of

Criminal Appeals denied Behringer due process of

law and equal protection under the law.

(d) Whether the Texas death penalty scheme denied

Behringer due process of law and imposed cruel and

unusual punishment by preventing Behringer from

informing the jury of the parole implications of a

life sentence while authorizing a jury instruction

not to consider parole eligibility in deciding the

answer to special issue two.

(e) Whether the Texas death penalty scheme denied

Behringer due process of law and imposed cruel and

unusual punishment by simultaneously restricting

the jury’s discretion to impose the death penalty

while allowing the jury unlimited discretion to

consider mitigating evidence.

The United States District Court, Judge John McBryde, filed a

detailed Memorandum and Order on October 2, 1995, denying the

petition for writ of habeas corpus and vacating a stay of

execution. The district court granted leave to appeal in forma

pauperis, but denied petitioner’s application for certificate of

probable cause. The district court rejected each of these claims.

We have reviewed the district court’s detailed Order and considered

the briefs and record before us. We reach the same conclusion as
3

the district court for essentially the reasons stated in its order

of October 2. The details of the crime and the treatment of the

claims are set out in the Order, and we will not restate them.

The application for Stay of Execution and Certificate of

Probable Cause are DENIED.
#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Storage                    
csv

      Inflow                    
csv

      Total Release                    
csv

      Pool Elevation                    
csv

      Delta Storage                    
csv

      Area                    
csv

      Evaporation                    
csv

      Release Volume                    
csv

      Inflow Volume                    
csv

      Bypass Release                    
csv

      Spillway Release                    
csv

      Bypass Release Volume                    
csv

#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Storage                    
json

      Inflow                    
json

      Total Release                    
json

      Pool Elevation                    
json

      Delta Storage                    
json

      Area                    
json

      Evaporation                    
json

      Release Volume                    
json

      Inflow Volume                    
json

      Bypass Release                    
json

      Spillway Release                    
json

      Bypass Release Volume                    
json