alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          13,863
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,760
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,838
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,461
<PP&E>                                         158,871
<DEPRECIATION>                                  97,789
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 111,749
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          261,898
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,611
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,884,207
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   111,749
<SALES>                                         46,427
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,835
<CGS>                                           38,272
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,272
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               252,511
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,855
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (257,803)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (258,603)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (258,603)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (0.016)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.016)


</TABLE>
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2164 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend for one year the 

15-year straight-line cost recovery for qualified leasehold improvements, 

qualified restaurant buildings and improvements, and qualified retail 

improvements. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 30, 2015 

Mr. GRAYSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

for one year the 15-year straight-line cost recovery for 

qualified leasehold improvements, qualified restaurant 

buildings and improvements, and qualified retail improvements. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2164 IH

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF 15-YEAR STRAIGHT-LINE COST 

2 RECOVERY FOR QUALIFIED LEASEHOLD IM3 PROVEMENTS, QUALIFIED RESTAURANT 

4 BUILDINGS AND IMPROVEMENTS, AND 

5 QUALIFIED RETAIL IMPROVEMENTS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Clauses (iv), (v), and (ix) of sec7 tion 168(e)(3)(E) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 

8 are each amended by striking ‘‘January 1, 2015’’ and in9 serting ‘‘January 1, 2016’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

11 this section shall apply to property placed in service after 

12 December 31, 2014. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2021486EN.01002101.xml

| 3.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 486/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 486/21

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10449 – KIA / ALMAVIVA)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 486/03)

On 19 November 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10449. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10449. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
MONUMENT CREEK AT PIKEVIEW, COLatitude: 38.918Longitude: -104.818Elevation: 6203

Monument Creek at Pikeview, CO

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Glen Cove Site Page...



Glen Cove
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of NMT Medical, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
the undersigned, John E. Ahern, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                    |  |                                                    
|------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 9, 2006 |  | /s/    JOHN E.
AHERN                               
|                    |  | John E. Ahern President and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 15, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 51374]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19843]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs

[212A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900253G]


Indian Gaming; Approval of Tribal-State Class III Gaming Compact 
in the State of Washington

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice publishes the approval of the Fourth Amendment to 
the Tribal-State Compact (Amendment) for Class III Gaming between the 
Kalispel Tribe of Indians (Tribe) and the State of Washington (State).

DATES: The Amendment takes effect on September 15, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of 
Indian Gaming, Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary--Policy and 
Economic Development, Washington, DC 20240, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#96e6f7e3faf7b8fef7e4e2d6f4fff7b8f1f9e0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7e0e1f0b121f50161f0c0a3e1c171f50191108">[email protected]</span></a>, (202) 
219-4066.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under section 11 of the Indian Gaming 
Regulatory Act (IGRA), Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq., the 
Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the Federal Register notice 
of approved Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class 
III gaming activities on Indian lands. As required by 25 CFR 293.4, all 
compacts and amendments are subject to review and approval by the 
Secretary. The Amendment authorizes the Tribe to engage in sports 
wagering at the Tribe's class III gaming facilities, updates the 
Compact to reflect this change in various sections, and incorporates 
Appendix S, Sports Wagering. The Amendment is approved.

Bryan Newland,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2021-19843 Filed 9-14-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337-15-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-8056

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CLARO GUTIERREZ GONZALEZ, a/k/a Sotero Cabrera Estrada,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, 

District Judge. (5:11-cr-00206-FL-2; 5:13-cv-00411-FL)

Submitted: June 10, 2014 Decided: June 26, 2014

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Claro Gutierrez Gonzalez, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. MayParker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Claro Gutierrez Gonzalez seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. 

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Gonzalez has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.2

PERICOM SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report of Pericom Semiconductor Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 30, 2006 (the Report), I, Angela Chen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

February 7, 2007



By:

/s/ Angela ChenAngela ChenChief Financial OfficerPericom Semiconductor Corporation
#### HECK, Respondent, v. MAYOR, ETC., OF CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

December 18, 1896.)

Action by Charles H. Heck against the mayor, etc., of the city of New York. J. J. Delany, for appellants. W. A. Purrington, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Aspinall Operations Meeti

August 16, 2018
FORECASTS AND ACTUAL RUN

72% of seasonal peak

2002: Peak Snow = 65% avg | 157 KAF (4/1 forecast 310 KAF)

2012: Peak Snow = 67% avg | 206 KAF (4/1 forecast 330 KAF)

2018: Peak Snow = 72% avg | 238 KAF (4/1 forecast 345 KAF)
Breaking down the Forecast: Seasonal Forecast Progression for Blue Mesa Reservoir In

Initial low forecasts continued to

slowly trend lower as dry

weather persisted

Increase

due to

storm

system in

early April

Dry weather returned.

June and especially May

volumes came in much

lower than anticipated

Oase
A good early April storm resulted in

increased forecasts in mid April.

Another storm system was advertised by

weather models that suggested April could

end up wetter than normal over southwest

Colorado.That system did not materialize and Aprilended up near to below average for

precipitation.

Very dry through the

first 6 days of April

By mid 

was ruaveragdried 
May – July precipitation for several sites were the lowest on record. The model does not have this ty

therefore it is not unreasonable that resulting observed streamflow volumes would fall below the 90

forecasts
APR MAY JUNE JULY RUNOF

2018 59% 50% 23% 25% 34%2012 65% 33% 20% 32% 34%2002 63% 25% 17% 20% 26%

BLACK CANYON PEAK

AND LOWER GUNNISON RIVER TAR

May

1 Forecast

350 KAF

May 14‐15

101

987 cfs
0

2000400060008000

10000120001400016000

200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 

Peak Q (cfs)

Forecast BM Apr-Jul Inflow (thousand af)

Peak Flow and Duration Day Targets at Whitew

DRY

MOD WET

AVGWET

AVGDRY

MODDRY

Apr‐July Forecast Half bank Duration Pe

(1000 AF) (days @ 8,070 cfs) (day

<381 0 

381‐516 0 516‐709 10 709‐831 20 

831‐1123 40 

>1123 60 

900 cfs

2030 cfs


SUMMER/FALL OPERATION

Drought Rules

 During Dry and Moderately Dry years, if Blue Mesa Reservoir con

drops below 600,000 af, the Whitewater baseflow target is reduced 

1050 cfs to 900 cfs until Blue Mesa Reservoir content exceeds 600,0

Baseflow Targets
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>   This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
           from the Balance Sheet and Statement of Operations included in the
           Company's Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 1999 and is
           qualified in its entirety by reference to such Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             3,755
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     15,812
<ALLOWANCES>                                         700
<INVENTORY>                                        9,174
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  32,769
<PP&E>                                            29,085
<DEPRECIATION>                                    13,278
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    48,765
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             12,702
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                             138
<OTHER-SE>                                        35,925
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      48,765
<SALES>                                           86,863
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  86,863
<CGS>                                             71,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     71,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  18,529
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (2,389)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        (669)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (1,720)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (1,720)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.13)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C., ss.1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In  connection  with  the  quarterly  report  on  Form  10-QSB  of  Xerion
EcoSolutions  Group Inc. (the  "Company")  for the quarter  ended  September 30,
2005, as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  the undersigned Chief Executive Officer,  President,  Treasurer
and principal  financial and accounting  officer of the Company,  hereby certify
pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material
respects  the   financial   condition   and  results  of  operations  of  Xerion
EcoSolutions Group Inc.

Dated: November 16, 2005

                                        /s/ Fang Zhong
                                        ------------------------------
                                        Fang Zhong
                                        Chief Executive Officer, President,
                                        Treasurer and principal financial and
                                        accounting officer
# C_2021190EN.01000201.xml

| 18.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10213 — Ravago/Indukern)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 190/02)

On 3 May 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10213. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10213. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              FEB-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                                         52,691,000
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  157,518,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,722,667,000
<PP&E>                                         33,984,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4,469,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,752,182,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,239,886,000
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       531,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     511,765,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,752,182,000
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               217,076,000
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               144,394,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                72,682,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   29,273,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            43,409,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                6,440,000
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   36,969,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.13
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                      11,633,979
<SECURITIES>                                78,196,624
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,573,662
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  4,585,074
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            95,989,339
<PP&E>                                      15,446,502
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,606,694
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             105,624,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,512,794
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,141
<OTHER-SE>                                 100,095,665
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               105,624,600
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,429,589
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,963,201
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (8,533,612)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (8,533,612)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-10-00785-CV

In re Walter Lee Hall, Jr.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8. Having

considered relator’s arguments and the record, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Puryear and Pemberton

Filed: December 13, 2010