alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SCPW-18-0000162
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

GALINA OGEONE, Petitioner,

vs. THE HONORABLE JEFFREY P. CRABTREE, Judge of the Circuit Court of the First Circuit, State of Hawai # i, Respondent Judge, and DENTIST LESLIE AU, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CIV. NOS. 16-1-1347-7 and 16-1-1348-7)
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Reck tenwald, C.J., Nak ayama, Mc Kenna, Po llack, an d Wilson, JJ.)

Upon consideration of petitioner Galina Ogeone’s petition for writ of mandamus, filed on March 16, 2018, the documents attached thereto and submitted in support thereof, and the record, it appears that petitioner fails to demonstrate that she is entitled to an extraordinary writ. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai # i 200, 204-05, 982 P.2d 334, 338-39 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-18-0000162 04-APR-2018 08:27 AMalleged wrong or obtain the requested action; where a court has

discretion to act, mandamus will not lie to interfere with or control the exercise of that discretion, even when the judge has acted erroneously, unless the judge has exceeded his or her jurisdiction, has committed a flagrant and manifest abuse of discretion, or has refused to act on a subject properly before the court under circumstances in which he or she has a legal duty to act). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, April 4, 2018. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

2
2 

Science Advisors Perspective on Needed 

GCDAMP Socio-Economic Research 

 GDCAMP creation of knowledge relating to social 

implications of management actions taken or planned 

needs to be expanded 

 GCDAMP should develop quality assessments of 

monetary impacts of management actions on various 

resources as budget and priorities permit 

 GCDAMP conduct of biophysical/socioeconomic 

tradeoff assessments needs to be improved 

 GCDAMP should develop tradeoff analysis 

methodology that is effective for real time adaptive 

management processes 


5
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           6,665
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,112
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,598
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,999
<PP&E>                                          30,471
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,684
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  78,183
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,775
<BONDS>                                         13,740
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            80
<OTHER-SE>                                      48,860
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    78,183
<SALES>                                        115,256
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               115,256
<CGS>                                           85,763
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   85,763
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,064
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,585
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,194
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,651
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,192
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,459
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,459
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.91


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1996 
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         26,822,653
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  13,753,865
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (43,136)
<INVENTORY>                                       190,755
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               44,355,988
<PP&E>                                         76,542,482 
<DEPRECIATION>                                (15,102,377)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                105,920,543
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          15,377,307
<BONDS>                                                 0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0  
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           62,802
<OTHER-SE>                                     54,601,835
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  105,920,543
<SALES>                                                 0  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               69,931,019  
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               65,035,483
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                683,921
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 4,211,615
<INCOME-TAX>                                    1,591,990
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             2,619,625  
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                    2,619,625
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0.51 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.51
        


</TABLE>
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 5 A0 93 8

. K W A M E ASKI A v

. DEUTSCHE BANK NATI ONAL TRUST
COMPANY.

Th i s cas e o ri g i n at ed as a d i s p o s s es s o ry p ro ceed i n g i n m ag i s t rat e co u rt

. Fo l l o wi ng an ad v ers e ru li n g , Kwam e As k i a ap p eal ed th e m ag i st rat e co u rt ’ s d eci s i o n

t o th e su p eri o r co u rt

. On Au g u s t 5

, 2 0 14 , t h e s u p eri or co u rt en t ered fi n al ju d g m en t

ag ai n s t As k i a, wh o fi l ed a n ot i ce o f d i rect ap peal t o t h e Su p rem e Co u rt o n Sep t em b er

8

, 2 0 14

. Th e Su p rem e Co u rt t ran s ferre d t h e c a s e h ere u p o n fi n d i n g n o b as i s fo r ju ri s d i ct i o n i n t h at co u rt . W e, h o wev er, al s o l ack ju ri s di ct i o n

. Fi rs t

, b ecau se th e o rd er at i s su e d i s p os es of a d e n ov o ap p eal fro m a m ag i s t rat e

co u rt d eci s io n , As k ia was req u i red t o fo l l o w t he d is cret i o n ary ap p eal p ro ced u res

. See

OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (1 ); En g l i s h v. Del br i d g e , 2 1 6 Ga. Ap p

. 3 6 6

, 3 6 7 (4 5 4 SE2 d 1 7 5 )
(1 9 9 5). Hi s fai l u re t o d o s o d ep ri v es u s o f ju ri s d i ct i o n o v er t hi s ap p eal

. Seco n d

, t h i s ap p e a l i s u n t i m el y

. Al t h o u gh a n o t i ce o f ap p eal g en eral l y m ay
b e fi l ed wi t h i n 3 0 d a ys o f e n t r y o f t h e o rd er s o u g h t t o be ap p eal ed

, t h e un d erl y i n g

s u b ject m at t er of an ap p eal co nt ro ls o v er t he rel i ef so u g h t i n d et erm i n i ng t he p ro p er

ap p el l at e p ro ced u re. See Reb i ch v. Mi l e s , 2 64 Ga. 4 67

, 4 6 7 -4 6 8 (4 4 8 SE2 d 1 9 2 )
(1 9 9 4). Th e u n d erl y i ng s u b ject m at t er o f t h i s cas e i s a di s p os s es s o ry ju d g m en t

. An d,

p u rs u an t t o OCGA § 4 4 -7 -5 6

, an ap p eal fro m a d i s p o ss es s o ry ju d g m en t m u st b e fi l ed

wi t h i n s ev en d ay s o f th e d at e t he ju d g m en t was en t ered

. See R a y M. W r i gh t

, In c. v.

Jo n es , 2 3 9 Ga. Ap p

. 5 2 1 (5 2 1 SE2 d 4 5 6 ) (1 9 9 9 ). Here, As k ia f i l e d h i s n o t i ce o f

ap p eal 3 4 d ay s aft er t h e s u p eri o r co urt ’ s o rd er was en t ered

. Fo r t h es e reas o n s , we

l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n t o rev i ew t h i s ap p eal , wh i ch i s h ereb y DISM ISSED. February 04, 2015C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e
, A t la n t a
,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 02/04/2015
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBINSON,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-70671

Agency No. A095-634-713

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 10, 2011** 

Before: BEEZER, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Robinson, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision (“IJ”) denying his application for asylum,

withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture

FILED

JAN 20 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-70671

(“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial

evidence factual findings, Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1056 (9th Cir. 2009), 

and we deny the petition for review.

The record does not compel the conclusion that Robinson filed his asylum

application within a reasonable period of time given any changed circumstances. 

See 8 C.F.R. § 1208(a)(4); Husyev v. Mukasey, 528 F.3d 1172, 1178-81 (9th Cir.

2008). Accordingly, his asylum claim fails. 

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that the mistreatment

Robinson experienced when his dog was attacked does not rise to the level of past

persecution. See Halim v. Holder, 590 F.3d 971, 975-976 (9th Cir. 2009)

(incidents including being “beaten by a mob of rioters because he appeared to be

Chinese” did not rise to the level of past persecution). Substantial evidence

supports the agency’s finding that Robinson has not established a clear probability

of persecution because, even under a disfavored group analysis, Robinson has not

established sufficient evidence of individualized risk. See Hoxha v. Ashcroft, 319

F.3d 1179, 1185 (9th Cir. 2003); Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d at 1066 (“[a]n

applicant for withholding of removal will need to adduce a considerably larger

quantum of individualized-risk evidence”). Robinson’s contention that the BIA
3 08-70671

failed to make findings regarding the events experienced by Robinson in Indonesia

is belied by the record. Accordingly, his withholding of removal claim fails.

Finally, substantial evidence supports that agency’s denial of Robinson’s

CAT claim because Robinson failed to show it is more likely than not that he will

be tortured if returned to Indonesia. See id. at 1067-68. Accordingly, his CAT

claim fails.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
EXHIBIT 32



SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION



The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the foregoing Report on Form 10-QSB pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed filed pursuant to any provision of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or any other securities law.



Each of the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78) and that the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Broadway Financial Corporation as of and for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2004.



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|                      |  |  | 
|Date: August 12, 2004 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Paul C. Hudson
|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  | Paul C. Hudson                       
|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  | Broadway Financial Corporation       
|                      |  |  | 
|Date: August 12, 2004 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Alvin D. Kang 
|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  | Alvin D. Kang                        
|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  | Chief Financial Officer              
|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  | Broadway Financial Corporation       



19
CRAWFORD RESERVOIRLatitude: 38.683Longitude: -107.603Elevation: 6565

CRAWFORD RESERVOIR
# L_2013072DE.01001601.xml

| 15.3.2013 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 72/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2013

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 72/16

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1223/2009 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 30. November 2009 über kosmetische Mittel

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 342 vom 22. Dezember 2009
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 342 vom 22. Dezember 2009

Seite 78, Artikel 39 Absatz 1:

anstatt:

„Abweichend von Richtlinie 76/768/EWG, können kosmetische Mittel, die dieser Verordnung entsprechen, vor dem Zeitpunkt gemäß Artikel 40 Absatz 211. Juli 2013 in Verkehr gebracht werden.“

muss es heißen:

„Abweichend von Richtlinie 76/768/EWG können kosmetische Mittel, die dieser Verordnung entsprechen, vor dem 11. Juli 2013 in Verkehr gebracht werden.“

Seite 78, Artikel 40 Absatz 1:

anstatt:

„Diese Verordnung tritt am [zwanzigsten Tag nach ihrer Veröffentlichung im Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union] in Kraft.“

muss es heißen:

„Diese Verordnung tritt am zwanzigsten Tag nach ihrer Veröffentlichung im Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union in Kraft.“

---
- 9-29-2011 Scheduling Order Governing Initial Pretrial Activities AB-07-1-p0001
- 9-29-2011 Scheduling Order Governing Initial Pretrial Activities AB-07-1-p0002
- 9-29-2011 Scheduling Order Governing Initial Pretrial Activities AB-07-1-p0003
- 9-29-2011 Scheduling Order Governing Initial Pretrial Activities AB-07-1-p0004
- 9-29-2011 Scheduling Order Governing Initial Pretrial Activities AB-07-1-p0005
- 9-29-2011 Scheduling Order Governing Initial Pretrial Activities AB-07-1-p0006
- 9-29-2011 Scheduling Order Governing Initial Pretrial Activities AB-07-1-p0007
- 9-29-2011 Scheduling Order Governing Initial Pretrial Activities AB-07-1-p0008
- 9-29-2011 Scheduling Order Governing Initial Pretrial Activities AB-07-1-p0009
- 9-29-2011 Scheduling Order Governing Initial Pretrial Activities AB-07-1-p0010
# C_2022224EN.01012601.xml

| 8.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/126 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/126

---

P9_TA(2021)0459

Insolvency proceedings: replacing Annexes A and B to Regulation ***I

European Parliament legislative resolution of 23 November 2021 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council replacing Annexes A and B to Regulation (EU) 2015/848 on insolvency proceedings (COM(2021)0231 — C9-0178/2021 — 2021/0118(COD))

(Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading)

(2022/C 224/16)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2021)0231), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2021)0231),

| — | having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 81 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C9-0178/2021), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 81 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C9-0178/2021),

| — | having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

| — | having regard to the undertaking given by the Council representative by letter of 10 November 2021 to approve Parliament’s position, in accordance with Article 294(4) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the undertaking given by the Council representative by letter of 10 November 2021 to approve Parliament’s position, in accordance with Article 294(4) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

| — | having regard to Rule 59 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 59 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A9-0293/2021), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A9-0293/2021),

| 1. | Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it replaces, substantially amends or intends to substantially amend its proposal; |
| --- | --- |

2.

| 3. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments. |
| --- | --- |

3.

---

P9_TC1-COD(2021)0118

Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 23 November 2021 with a view to the adoption of Regulation (EU) 2021/... of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2015/848 on insolvency proceedings to replace its Annexes A and B

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position corresponds to the final legislative act, Regulation (EU) 2021/2260.)

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1972 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1972

To provide certain requirements for the licensing of commercial nuclear 
                              facilities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 22, 2015

 Mrs. Lowey (for herself and Mr. Engel) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide certain requirements for the licensing of commercial nuclear 
                              facilities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Nuclear Power Licensing Reform Act 
of 2015''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS.

    Section 103 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2133) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (b), by inserting ``, including that the 
        facility does not pose an unreasonable threat to persons or the 
        environment because of safety or security vulnerabilities 
        (including vulnerability to terrorist attacks), and that there 
        exist adequate evacuation plans for emergency events and that 
        those plans have been approved by the relevant Federal agencies 
        and States within 50 miles of the facility'' after ``by rule 
        establish''; and
            (2) in subsection (c), by adding at the end the following: 
        ``Any such renewal shall be subject to the same criteria and 
        requirements that would be applicable for an original 
        application for initial construction, and the Commission shall 
        ensure that any changes in the size or distribution of the 
        surrounding population, or seismic or other scientific data not 
        available at time of original licensing, have not resulted in 
        the facility being located at a site at which a new facility 
        would not be allowed to be built.''.
                                 <all>
```
COLORADO RIVER BELOW INTERSTATE BRIDGELatitude: 33.589Longitude: -114.543Elevation: None

Colorado River Below Interstate Bridge

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Gutz Peak Site Page...



Gutz Peak

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Gardner Peak Site Page...



Gardner Peak

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Rainbow Canyon Site Page...



Rainbow Canyon

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Bristlecone Trail Site Page...



Bristlecone Trail

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Lee Canyon Site Page...



Lee Canyon

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Fort Valley Site Page...



Fort Valley

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Mormon Mtn Summit Site Page...



Mormon Mtn Summit

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Nutrioso Site Page...



Nutrioso

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Chalender Site Page...



Chalender

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Baker Butte Smt Site Page...



Baker Butte Smt

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Corduroy Flat Site Page...



Corduroy Flat

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Defiance Mines Site Page...



Defiance Mines

Courtesy NRCS - Go to White River Nv Site Page...



White River Nv

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Suu Ranch Site Page...



Suu Ranch

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Kyle Canyon Site Page...



Kyle Canyon

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Hayford Peak Site Page...



Hayford Peak

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Pine Nut Site Page...



Pine Nut

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Sand Hollow Site Page...



Sand Hollow

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Cave Valley Site Page...



Cave Valley

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Vermillion Site Page...



Vermillion

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Baker Butte Site Page...



Baker Butte

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Baldy Site Page...



Baldy

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Harris Flat Site Page...



Harris Flat

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Heber Site Page...



Heber

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Kolob Site Page...



Kolob

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Little Grassy Site Page...



Little Grassy

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Long Flat Site Page...



Long Flat

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Long Valley Jct Site Page...



Long Valley Jct

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Maverick Fork Site Page...



Maverick Fork

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Midway Valley Site Page...



Midway Valley

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Mormon Mountain Site Page...



Mormon Mountain

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Promontory Site Page...



Promontory

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Ward Mountain Site Page...



Ward Mountain

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Webster Flat Site Page...



Webster Flat

Courtesy NRCS - Go to White Horse Lake Site Page...



White Horse Lake

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Snowslide Canyon Site Page...



Snowslide Canyon