alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021367EN.01000301.xml

| 13.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 367/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 367/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10377 — RAG-Stiftung/Open Grid Europe/H2UB)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 367/03)

On 6 September 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10377. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10377. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Sean George, Appellant.

[945 NYS2d 569]

— Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated November 3, 2010 *(People v George,*78 AD3d 728 [2010]), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Orange County, rendered October 29, 2007.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Skelos, J.P., Balkin, Chambers and Austin, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Blount International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Calvin E. Jenness, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the report.

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Blount International, Inc. and will be retained by Blount International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: May 6, 2011



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Calvin E. Jenness        
|Calvin E. Jenness            
|Senior Vice President and    
|Chief Financial Officer      
|(Principal Financial Officer)
# C_2021121EN.01004401.xml

| 9.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 121/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 121/44

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9945 — Siemens Healthineers/Varian Medical Systems)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 121/02)

On 19 February 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M9945. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M9945. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Listen

# Performance and Accountability Report for Fiscal Year 2020

November 17, 2020

Report

-  All Reports 
-  Annual Statutory Enforcement 
-  Briefing Reports 
-  Advisory Committees Reports 
-  Budget and Performance 
-  FOIA Reports 
-  Data Inventory Program 
-  Civil Rights Complaints 
-  Historical Publications 
-  Archives
#### SMITH, Appellant, v. TAYLOR et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fifth Department.

January 18, 1894.)

Action by Andrew K. Smith against James E. Taylor and another.

No opinion. Judgment appealed from affirmed, with costs.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2252 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2252

                     One Hundred Fourteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the sixth day of January, two thousand and fifteen

                                 An Act

 
To clarify the effective date of certain provisions of the Border Patrol 
          Agent Pay Reform Act of 2014, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF EFFECTIVE DATE OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE 
BORDER PATROL AGENT PAY REFORM ACT OF 2014.
    (a) In General.--Section 2 of the Border Patrol Agent Pay Reform 
Act of 2014 (Public Law 113-277) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
    ``(i) Effective Date.--Subsections (b), (c), (d), and (g), and the 
amendments made by such subsections, shall take effect on the first day 
of the first pay period beginning on or after January 1, 2016, except 
that--
        ``(1) any provision in section 5550(b) of title 5, United 
    States Code, as added by subsection (b), relating to administering 
    elections and making advance assignments to a regular tour of duty 
    shall be applicable before such effective date to the extent 
    determined necessary by the Director of the Office of Personnel 
    Management; and
        ``(2) the Director may issue regulations as necessary prior to 
    such effective date.''.
    (b) Application.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall be 
deemed to have been enacted on the date of enactment of the Border 
Patrol Agent Pay Reform Act of 2014 (Public Law 113-277).

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER I certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-KSB of The viaLink Company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periods covered
by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operation and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have:  (a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the Company is made known to us by
others, particularly during the periods in which this report is being
prepared;  (b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
report (the Evaluation Date); and  (c)
    
    presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;  5.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee
of our board of directors:  (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect our ability to record, process,
summarize, and report financial data and have identified for the
Companys auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  (b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
controls; and  6.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. Date: March 26, 2004By:
    /s/ ROBERT I. NOERobert I. NoeChief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1



PERICOM SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this quarterly report of Pericom Semiconductor Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 27, 2003 (the Report), I, Alex C. Hui, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.



|                  |  |  |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                      
|----------------- |  |  |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|February 10, 2004 |  |  |  | 
|                  |  |  |  | 
|                  |  |  |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Alex C. Hui                                                      
|                  |  |  |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                      
|                  |  |  |  |  |  |     |  | Alex C. Hui Chief Executive Officer Pericom
Semiconductor Corporation
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5
<LEGEND>
Exhibit 27  Financial Data Schedule

This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's unaudited financial statements at September 30, 1999 and 2000, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.



<S>                                           <C>                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1998         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-1999         SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          1,007,125             727,479
<SECURITIES>                                            0                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      19,918              22,678
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0                   0
<INVENTORY>                                        93,027              73,756
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                1,325,300             930,431
<PP&E>                                            161,379             167,512
<DEPRECIATION>                                    116,188             143,667
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  1,418,683           1,008,915
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              49,736              29,060
<BONDS>                                                 0                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0                   0
<COMMON>                                            2,925               2,925
<OTHER-SE>                                      6,248,752           6,248,752
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    1,418,683           1,008,915
<SALES>                                         1,333,947             649,874
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                1,333,947             649,874
<CGS>                                             217,498             119,471
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   1,477,911             508,112
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  458,745             416,553
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (547,904)           (222,750)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (547,904)           (222,750)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0                   0
<CHANGES>                                               0                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (547,904)           (222,750)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (0.19)              (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.19)              (0.08)


</TABLE>
Discussion of the Anticipated Scope of 

the Forthcoming Bug Flow Evaluation 

Document 

Ted Kennedy, US Geological Survey, Southwest Biological 

Science Center, Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center

U.S. Department of the Interior

U.S. Geological Survey
Bug Flows Key Findings

▪ River-wide increase in algae production

▪ 45% higher during weekends (+100 tons of algae)

▪ Algae increases greatest in N-S reaches

▪ i.e., LCR confluence, Fall Canyon

▪ 400% increase in caddisflies in 2 of 3 Bug Flow years (’18, ‘20)

▪ Caddis increase greatest in N-S (possible algae link?)

▪ Midge emergence higher during weekends

▪ More emergent rocks on weekends

▪ Angler catch rates higher on weekends

▪ Diet quality of Rainbow Trout higher on weekends

B. Deemer, unpublished data, do not cite

J. Muehlbauer, unpublished data, do not cite

From Metcalfe and others 2020, Boatman’s Quarterly Review
Bug Flows-Wrinkles & Caveats

▪ No increase in midges

▪ Caddisfly increases can’t be from egg-laying benefits alone

Midges Caddisflies Caddisflies & sediment

J. Muehlbauer, unpublished data, do not cite
Bug Flows & Hydropower

▪ Cost of experiment has increased over time

▪ FY18 - $165,000

▪ FY19 - $317,000

▪ FY20 - $407,000 (estimated)

▪ FY21 - >$700k (estimated)

2021 estimates

$$$$ $$

$ $ ??

??

??

??

https://www.gcmrc.gov/discharge_qw_sediment/station/GCDAMP/09402500
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,808
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   94,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,780
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               144,620
<PP&E>                                         247,768
<DEPRECIATION>                                  80,435
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 352,533
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          487,352
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,094
<OTHER-SE>                                   (252,913)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   352,533
<SALES>                                         28,188
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,861
<CGS>                                           28,321
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   29,275
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                31,433
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,906
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (144,255)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (144,255)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (144,255)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.011)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.011)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.1











CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of TransAct Technologies Incorporated (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Bart C. Shuldman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








Date:  March
16,
2009





/s/
      Bart C. ShuldmanBart
      C. Shuldman
                  Chief
      Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of NMT Medical, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
the undersigned, Richard E. Davis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                    |  |                                                            
|------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 9, 2006 |  | /s/    RICHARD E.
DAVIS                                    
|                    |  | Richard E. Davis Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STEVE Y. GARRISON,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr.; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 13-15189

D.C. No. 5:11-cv-01901-EJD

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Edward J. Davila, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 21, 2014** 

Before: CANBY, SILVERMAN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Steve Y. Garrison appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging various

constitutional violations in connection with his incarceration. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s dismissal under 28

FILED

JAN 27 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
U.S.C. § 1915A. Weilburg v. Shapiro, 488 F.3d 1202, 1205 (9th Cir. 2007). We

affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Garrison’s action because Garrison

failed to allege sufficient facts in his Second Amended Complaint showing that

defendants violated his constitutional rights. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662,

678 (2009) (to state a claim for relief that is plausible on its face, a plaintiff must

allege facts that “allow[ ] the court to draw the reasonable inference that the

defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged”); see also McHenry v. Renne, 84

F.3d 1172, 1177-78 (9th Cir. 1996) (a complaint must make clear “who is being

sued, for what relief, and on what theory, with enough detail to guide discovery”).

Garrison’s contentions concerning any alleged misconduct by the district

court are without merit.

We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on

appeal, including those concerning forced medication, alleged misconduct by San

Jose police officers, and recent denials of mental health services and legal supplies. 

See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009) (per curiam).

All pending motions are denied.

AFFIRMED.

2 13-15189
Skip to main content

Privacy Policy•Site map

# U.S. Court of Federal Claims Advisory Council

Welcome to the webpage for the U.S. Court of Federal Claims Advisory Council.

The purpose of the Advisory Council is to promote and improve the administration of justice in the country’s national trial court, the United States Court of Federal Claims.

For more information about the Advisory Council, please click on the links below.
                                    - Organization Chart
                                    - List of Members
                                    - Meeting Materials
                                    - Advisory Council Presentation on Virtual Trials - With Judge Firestone

Howard T. Markey National Courts Building • 717 Madison Place, NW, Washington, DC 20439 • 202-357-6400