Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 178 / Friday, September 17, 2021 / Notices 51887 

1 12 CFR part 370. 

burden for small business concerns with 

fewer than 25 employees.’’ 

OMB Control Number: 3060–0139. 

Title: Application for Antenna 

Structure Registration. 

Form Number: FCC Form 854. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents: Individuals or 

households, business or other for-profit 

entities, not-for-profit institutions, and 

State, local, or Tribal governments. 

Number of Respondents and 

Responses: 2,400 respondents; 57,100 

responses. 

Estimated Time per Response: .33 

hours to 2.5 hours. 

Frequency of Response: On occasion 

reporting requirement, recordkeeping 

requirement and third-party disclosure 

reporting requirement. 

Obligation to Respond: Required to 

obtain or retain benefits. Statutory 

authority for this information collection 

is contained in sections 1, 2, 4(i), 303, 

and 309(j) of the Communications Act of 

1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 152, 

154(i), 303, and 309(j), section 102(C) of 

the National Environmental Policy Act 

of 1969, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 4332(C), 

and section 1506.6 of the regulations of 

the Council on Environmental Quality, 

40 CFR 1506.6. 

Total Annual Burden: 25,682 hours. 

Total Annual Cost: $1,176,813. 

Needs and Uses: The purpose of FCC 

Form 854 (Form 854) is to register 

antenna structures that are used for 

radio communication services which are 

regulated by the Commission; to make 

changes to existing antenna structure 

registrations or pending applications for 

registration; or to notify the Commission 

of the completion of construction or 

dismantlement of such structures, as 

required by Title 47 of the Code of 

Federal Regulations, Chapter 1, Sections 

1.923, 1.1307, 1.1311, 17.1, 17.2, 17.4, 

17.5, 17.6, 17.7, 17.57 and 17.58. 

Any person or entity proposing to 

construct or alter an antenna structure 

that is more than 60.96 meters (200 feet) 

in height, or that may interfere with the 

approach or departure space of a nearby 

airport runway, must notify the Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) of 

proposed construction. The FAA 

determines whether the antenna 

structure constitutes a potential hazard 

and may recommend appropriate 

painting and lighting for the structure. 

The Commission then uses the FAA’s 

recommendation to impose specific 

painting and/or lighting requirements 

on radio tower owners and subject 

licensees. When an antenna structure 

owner for one reason or another does 

not register its structure, it then 

becomes the responsibility of the tenant 

licensees to ensure that the structure is 

registered with the Commission. 

Section 303(q) of the Communications 

Act of 1934, as amended, gives the 

Commission authority to require 

painting and/or illumination of radio 

towers in cases where there is a 

reasonable possibility that an antenna 

structure may cause a hazard to air 

navigation. In 1992, Congress amended 

Sections 303(q) and 503(b)(5) of the 

Communications Act to make radio 

tower owners, as well as Commission 

licensees and permittees responsible for 

the painting and lighting of radio tower 

structures, and to provide that nonlicensee radio tower owners may be 

subject to forfeiture for violations of 

painting or lighting requirements 

specified by the Commission. 

OMB Control Number: 3060–0979. 

Title: License Audit Letter. 

Form Number: N/A. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents: Individuals or 

households, business or other for-profit 

entities, not-for-profit institutions and 

state, local or tribal government. 

Number of Respondents: 25,000 

respondents; 25,000 responses. 

Estimated Time per Response: .50 

hours. 

Frequency of Response: One-time 

reporting requirement. 

Obligation To Respond: Required to 

obtain or retain benefits. Statutory 

authority for this information collection 

is contained in 47 U.S.C. 151, 152, 

154(i), 155(c), 157, 201, 202, 208, 214, 

301, 302a, 303, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 

314, 316, 319, 324, 331, 332, 333, 336, 

534 and 535. 

Total Annual Burden: 12,500 hours. 

Total Annual Cost: No cost. 

Needs and Uses: The Commission is 

seeking OMB approval for an extension 

of this information collection in order to 

obtain their full three-year approval. 

There is no change to the reporting 

requirement. There is no change to the 

Commission’s burden estimates. The 

Wireless Telecommunications (WTB) 

and Public Safety and Homeland 

Security Bureaus (PSHSB) of the FCC 

periodically conduct audits of the 

construction and/or operational status 

of various Wireless radio stations in its 

licensing database that are subject to 

rule-based construction and operational 

requirements. The Commission’s rules 

for these Wireless services require 

construction within a specified 

timeframe and require a station to 

remain operational in order for the 

license to remain valid. The information 

will be used by FCC personnel to assure 

that licensees’ stations are constructed 

and currently operating in accordance 

with the parameters of the current FCC 

authorization and rules. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Marlene Dortch, 

Secretary, Office of the Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2021–20084 Filed 9–16–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE 

CORPORATION 

Notice of the FDIC’s Response to 

Exception Requests Pursuant to 

Recordkeeping for Timely Deposit 

Insurance Determination 

AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance 

Corporation (FDIC). 

ACTION: Notice of the FDIC’s response to 

exception requests pursuant to the 

recordkeeping for timely deposit 

insurance determination rule. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with its rule 

regarding recordkeeping for timely 

deposit insurance determination, the 

FDIC is providing notice that it has 

granted time-limited exception relief to 

two covered institutions from the 

information technology system and 

recordkeeping requirements applicable 

to deposits reflected on loan systems, 

including deposits resulting from credit 

balances on an account for debt owed to 

the covered institution and deposits 

held in escrow by a covered institution. 

The two covered institutions are in the 

process of converting or upgrading their 

loan systems. 

DATES: The FDIC’s grant of exception 

relief is effective as of September 14, 

2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Cassandra Knighton, Acting Section 

Chief, Division of Complex Institution 

Supervision and Resolution; 

CKnighton@FDIC.gov; 972–761–2802. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FDIC 

granted a time-limited exception request 

to two covered institutions pursuant to 

the FDIC’s rule entitled ‘‘Recordkeeping 

for Timely Deposit Insurance 

Determination,’’ codified at 12 CFR part 

370 (part 370).1 Part 370 generally 

requires covered institutions to 

implement the information technology 

system and recordkeeping capabilities 

needed to quickly calculate the amount 

of deposit insurance coverage available 

for each deposit account in the event of 

failure. Pursuant to § 370.8(b)(1), one or 

more covered institutions may submit a 

request in the form of a letter to the 

FDIC for an exception from one or more 

51888 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 178 / Friday, September 17, 2021 / Notices 

of the requirements of part 370 if 

circumstances exist that would make it 

impracticable or overly burdensome to 

meet those requirements. Pursuant to 

§ 370.8(b)(2), the FDIC publishes a 

notice of its response to each exception 

request in the Federal Register. 

Pursuant to § 370.8(b)(3), a covered 

institution may rely upon another 

covered institution’s exception request 

which the FDIC has previously granted 

by notifying the FDIC that it will invoke 

relief from certain part 370 requirements 

and demonstrating that the covered 

institution has substantially similar 

facts and circumstances to those of the 

covered institution that has already 

received the FDIC’s approval. The 

notification letter must also include the 

information required under § 370.8(b)(1) 

and cite the applicable notice published 

pursuant to § 370.8(b)(2). Unless 

informed otherwise by the FDIC within 

120 days after the FDIC’s receipt of a 

complete notification for exception, the 

exception will be deemed granted 

subject to the same conditions set forth 

in the FDIC’s published notice. 

These grants of relief will be subject 

to ongoing FDIC review, analysis, and 

verification during the FDIC’s routine 

part 370 compliance tests. The FDIC 

presumes each covered institution is 

meeting all the requirements set forth in 

the Rule unless relief has otherwise 

been granted. These grants of relief may 

be rescinded or modified upon: 

Discovery of misrepresentation; material 

change of circumstances or conditions 

related to the subject accounts; or failure 

to satisfy conditions applicable to each. 

The following exceptions were granted 

by the FDIC as of September 14, 2021. 

I. Certain Deposits Reflected on Loan 

Systems for Which the Covered 

Institutions Is Not Capable of 

Completing Deposit Insurance 

Calculation Process Because Additional 

Time Is Required for System Upgrades 

or Conversions 

The FDIC granted time-limited 

exception relief from part 370’s 

information technology system 

requirements set forth in § 370.3 and 

recordkeeping requirements set forth in 

§ 370.4 applicable to deposits reflected 

on loan systems, including deposits 

resulting from credit balances on an 

account for debt owed to the covered 

institution and deposits held in escrow 

by the covered institution. Such relief 

was granted to two covered institutions 

for up to 18 months after their 

compliance date. One covered 

institution requested exception relief 

from the recordkeeping requirements 

because it has multiple lending systems 

in need of recordkeeping upgrades and 

technical coding fixes without which it 

cannot produce the requisite data 

within the timeframe and in the format 

required by § 370.4(d). The covered 

institution requested exception relief in 

order to complete its IT solution to 

integrate data into its part 370 

calculation system and perform relevant 

testing. The other covered institution 

requested exception relief from the 

information technology system and 

recordkeeping requirements because it 

requires additional time to complete the 

conversion of its commercial loan 

servicing platform and make system 

upgrades. The FDIC granted both 

covered institutions a time-limited 

exception for up to 18 months from 

their respective compliance dates. 

In connection with the FDIC’s grants 

of relief, these covered institutions 

represented that they will maintain the 

capability to place holds on the deposit 

accounts subject to the exception in the 

event of failure until deposit insurance 

can be calculated using data manually 

extracted from the current loan systems. 

As conditions of relief, these covered 

institutions must submit a status report 

to part370@fdic.gov at the midpoint of 

the exception relief period and 

immediately bring to the FDIC’s 

attention any change of circumstances 

or conditions. 

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. 

Dated at Washington, DC, on September 

14, 2021. 

James P. Sheesley, 

Assistant Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2021–20160 Filed 9–16–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6714–01–P 

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION 

[Docket No. 21–08] 

Eucatex of North America Inc., 

Complainant v. CMA CGM (America) 

LLC and Fenix Marine Services Ltd., 

Respondents; Notice of Filing of 

Complaint and Assignment 

Served: September 14, 2021. 

Notice is given that a complaint has 

been filed with the Federal Maritime 

Commission (Commission) by Eucatex 

of North America Inc., hereinafter 

‘‘Complainant’’, against CMA CGM 

(America) LLC (CMA) and Fenix Marine 

Services Ltd. (FMS), hereinafter 

‘‘Respondents’’. Complainant state that 

it is a Georgia corporation. Complainant 

alleges that Respondent CMA is a New 

Jersey company and a common carrier 

under 46 U.S.C. 40102(7), and that 

Respondent FMS is a Delaware 

corporation and a marine terminal 

operator under 46 U.S.C. 40102(15). 

Complainant alleges that Respondents 

violated 46 U.S.C. 41102(c), and 46 CFR 

545.4 and 545.5, in relation to 

demurrage charges imposed on several 

shipments. The full text of the 

complaint can be found in the 

Commission’s Electronic Reading Room 

at https://www2.fmc.gov/readingroom/ 

proceeding/21-08/. 

This proceeding has been assigned to 

Office of Administrative Law Judges. 

The initial decision of the presiding 

office in this proceeding shall be issued 

by September 14, 2022, and the final 

decision of the Commission shall be 

issued by March 28, 2023. 

Rachel E. Dickon, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2021–20179 Filed 9–16–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6730–02–P 

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 

Change in Bank Control Notices; 

Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank or 

Bank Holding Company 

The notificants listed below have 

applied under the Change in Bank 

Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and 

§ 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 

CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank 

or bank holding company. The factors 

that are considered in acting on the 

applications are set forth in paragraph 7 

of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)). 

The public portions of the 

applications listed below, as well as 

other related filings required by the 

Board, if any, are available for 

immediate inspection at the Federal 

Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and at 

the offices of the Board of Governors. 

This information may also be obtained 

on an expedited basis, upon request, by 

contacting the appropriate Federal 

Reserve Bank and from the Board’s 

Freedom of Information Office at 

https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/ 

request.htm. Interested persons may 

express their views in writing on the 

standards enumerated in paragraph 7 of 

the Act. 

Comments regarding each of these 

applications must be received at the 

Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of 

the Board of Governors, Ann E. 

Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW, 

Washington, DC 20551–0001, not later 

than October 4, 2021. 

A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York 

(Ivan Hurwitz, Senior Vice President) 33 

Liberty Street, New York, New York 

10045–0001. Comments can also be sent 

electronically to 

Comments.applications@ny.frb.org: