alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit10.17**

 

NMT MEDICAL, INC. 

 

Amendment No. 2 

 

to 

 

1996 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors, as Amended 

 

WHEREAS, NMT Medical, Inc. (the “Company”) wishes to recognize theadditional time commitments and responsibilities assumed by each member of the Board of Directors who serves on one or more committees of the Board of Directors of the Company, and 

 

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has adopted, and the Stockholders of the Company have approved, the following amendments:

 

NOW, THEREFORE, the 1996 Stock Option Plan for Non-EmployeeDirectors, as amended (the “Plan”) of the Company, is hereby amended as follows (capitalized terms used herein and not defined herein shall have the respective meaning ascribed to such terms in the Plan): 

 

1.    The first sentence of Section 5(b) of the plan shallbe deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 

 

“Upon first election or appointment to the Board, each newly elected Eligible Director will be granted an option to purchase 20,000 Shares.” 

 

2.    Section 5(c) of the Plan shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

 

“Immediately following each AnnualStockholders Meeting, each Eligible Director, other than an Eligible Director first elected to the Board within the 12 months immediately preceding and including such meeting, will be granted an option to purchase 5,000 Shares as of the date of suchmeeting. In addition, also following each Annual Stockholders Meeting, each Eligible Director who served as a member of a committee of the Board during the preceding fiscal year will be granted an additional option to purchase (i) 2,000 Shares ifsuch Eligible Director served as chairperson of such committee or (ii) 1,000 Shares if such Eligible Director did not serve as a chairperson of such committee. The options granted to such Eligible Director shall be fully vested six months after thedate of grant.” 

 

Except as aforesaid, the Plan shall remainin full force and effect. 

 

Adopted by the Board ofDirectors on March 7, 2002. 

Approved by the Stockholders on June 28, 2002.
PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

______

No. 08-3874

______

MUHAMMAD SAEED MALIK,

 Petitioner

v.

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES,

 Respondent

______

On Petition for Review from an

Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

(Board No. A46-964-203)

Immigration Judge: Honorable Mirlande Tadal

______

Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

September 23, 2011

Before: FISHER, HARDIMAN and GREENAWAY, Jr., Circuit Judges.

____________

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the opinion in the above case, filed October 4, 

2011, be amended as follows:

Page 3, lines 2-3 (the last sentence before Section I), which read:

We will dismiss the petition for review.

shall read:

We will deny the petition for review.

By the Court,

Circuit Judge

/s/ D. Michael Fisher

Dated: October 7, 2011
MB/cc: M. Anne Hannigan, Esq.

Gopal T. Kukreja, Esq.

Daniel I. Smulow, Esq.

Paul F. Stone, Esq.
# C_2021383EN.01000201.xml

| 21.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 383/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 383/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10244 — Vodafone Group/Safaricom/Sumitomo/Ethiopia JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 383/02)

On 14 September 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10244. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10244. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2195 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2195

To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 to 
eliminate exceptions to the limitations imposed on the authority of the 
 Secretary of the Army to take certain actions in connection with the 
   transfer of AH-64 Apache helicopters from the Army National Guard.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 1, 2015

 Mr. Rothfus introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 to 
eliminate exceptions to the limitations imposed on the authority of the 
 Secretary of the Army to take certain actions in connection with the 
   transfer of AH-64 Apache helicopters from the Army National Guard.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Preserving National Guard Combat 
Readiness Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF EXCEPTIONS TO THE PROHIBITION OF CERTAIN ACTIONS 
              IN CONNECTION WITH TRANSFER OF AH-64 APACHE HELICOPTERS.

    Section 1712 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2015 (Public Law 113-291) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b), by striking ``but subject to the 
        exceptions provided in subsection (e),''; and
            (2) by striking subsections (e) and (f).
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 13.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of RADCOM Ltd. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jonathan Burgin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









/s/ Jonathan BurginJonathan BurginChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
#### In the Matter of Jan Baginski, Respondent, v Mieczystaw Rostkowski, Appellant.

[946 NYS2d 886]

In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, Mieczystaw Rostkowski appeals from an order of protection of the Family Court, Queens County (Fitzmaurice, J), dated September 26, 2011, which, upon a finding, made after a hearing, that he had committed a family offense, directed him, inter alia, to stay away from the petitioner until and including September 12, 2013.

Ordered that the order of protection is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Although the Family Court failed to specify the particular family offense under Family Court Act § 812 (1) that the appellant committed, remittal is not necessary because the record is sufficient for this Court to conduct an independent review of the evidence *(see Matter of Drury v Drury,*90 AD3d 754, 754 [2011]). The evidence adduced at the hearing established, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the appellant engaged in acts which would constitute the offenses of menacing in the third degree, disorderly conduct, and harassment in the second *1052degree *(see*Family Ct Act § 812 [1]; § 832; Penal Law §§ 120.15, 240.20, 240.26 [1]; *Matter of Melissa K. v Brian K.,*72 AD3d 1129 [2010]; *Matter of Sblendorio v D’Agostino,*60 AD3d 773 [2009]; *Matter of Miriam M. v Warren M.,*51 AD3d 581 [2008]; *Matter of Sinclair v Batista-Mall,*50 AD3d 1044 [2008]). Rivera, J.P., Eng, Lott and Cohen, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Annual  Report of Altair  Nanotechnologies  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-K for the fiscal  year ended  December  31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Rudi E. Moerck, President of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Rudi E. Moerck
-----------------------
Rudi E. Moerck
President
March 26, 2004
Exhibit 32.1**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Annual Report of Wilsons The Leather Experts Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 3, 2007, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael M. Searles, Chairman and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and     2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.             /s/  MICHAEL M. SEARLES   **Michael M. Searles**   **Chairman and Chief Executive Officer**   Date: March 30, 2007
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 23.2

     CONSENT OF BDO SEIDMAN, LLP, INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


   We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8, No. 333-16633) pertaining to the Gargoyles, Inc. 1995 Stock
Incentive Compensation Plan of our report dated April 2, 1999, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Gargoyles, Inc. included
in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.  Our
report contains an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern.


BDO Seidman, LLP
Seattle, Washington
April 15, 1999
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Grimes, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Egitto, J.), rendered May 17, 1982, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Eiber, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.
FPPO - PUMP PLANT F-FFLatitude: 42.08Longitude: -121.843Elevation: None

FPPO - Pump Plant F-FF
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 28, 2019 p0520

Order 

Clerk

May 28, 2019

157399

MATTHEW YOUNG,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v SC: 157399

COA: 331352

Ingham CC: 15-000438-AA

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

By order of October 2, 2018, the application for leave to appeal the December 21, 

2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in 

Henderson v Civil Serv Comm (Docket No. 156270). On order of the Court, the case 

having been decided on March 15, 2019, ___ Mich ___ (2019), the application is again 

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented 

should be reviewed by this Court.
Flaming Gorge Technical Working 

Group

May 29, 2018 Hydrology Summary

Jed Parker, P.E.

This hydrologic update provides information regarding current conditions and fulfills the 

requirements detailed in the 2005 Flaming Gorge Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) 

in Section 2.5.3 related to an operational plan for Flaming Gorge Dam (“Hydrology Summary”). 

The Hydrology Summary is to describe the current hydrologic classification of the Green River 

and Yampa River Basins, including the most probable runoff patterns for the two basins. 

Hydrologic determinations for both the Yampa River Basin and Green River Basin above 

Flaming Gorge have been made and are unlikely to change unless significant, unexpected 

precipitation occurs in either basin. The Green River Basin above Flaming Gorge Reservoir is 

expected to receive 1,120,000 acre-feet in the April through July runoff period (May mid-month 

forecast), placing it in the average (below median) hydrologic classification. The Yampa River 

Basin is expected to receive 841,000 acre-feet for the same April through July runoff period, 

placing it in the moderately dry hydrologic classification. These projections are based off of the 

Colorado River Forecast Center’s May Final Forecast. 

10-Day Streamflow Forecasts

The following, Figure 1, illustrates 10-day forecasted flow values for the Yampa River at the 

Deerlodge Park gage, May 29 through June 9, 2018. A CBRFC projection for the Green River at 

the Jensen, UT gage is provided in Figure 2 for the same May 29 – June 9, 2018 timeframe.
Figure 1 - Streamflow forecast for the Yampa River, May 29 – June 9, 2018.
Figure 2 - CBRFC projection for the Green River at Jensen, UT, May 29 - June 09, 2018.

Proposed ramp down rates

Table 1 contains proposed ramp down rates starting Friday, June 1, 2018. The proposed 

schedule is intended to detail releases from Flaming Gorge through the June 24-month study 

period. A determination can then be made to reconsider further operational decisions. 

Table 1 - Proposed ramp down schedule.

Date Daily Avg. (cfs)

5/31/2018 ~4,600

6/1/2018 4250

6/2/2018 3900

6/3/2018 3550

6/4/2018 3200

6/5/2018 2850

6/6/2018 2500

6/7/2018 2150

6/8/2018 1800
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

MAIRA HORTA MOSS, )

) No. OP 23-0377

 Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

CHAD SEHECHAL, ) ORDER TO DISMISS

)

 Respondent, and )

)

THE HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER)

ABBOTT, Presiding Judge, )

)

 Respondent. )

Upon receipt of the Petitioner’s Unopposed Motion to Dismiss, and good 

cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that the Petitioner’s motion is GRANTED. 

Each party shall pay its own costs and fees and this matter is dismissed without 

prejudice.

Electronically signed by:

James Jeremiah Shea

Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 20 2023

07/20/2023

Case Number: OP 23-0377
# C_2021071EN.01006001.xml

| 1.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/60

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10140 — EFMS/VFMF/FocusVision/Confirmit/Dapresy)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 71/07)

On 23 February 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10140. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10140. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2021170EN.01000701.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 6.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 170/7 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10246 - Hellman & Friedman/Cordis)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 170/06)

1.

On 29 April 2021, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 and following a referral pursuant to Article 4(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2021170EN.01000701-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Hellman & Friedman LLC (USA, ‘H&F’), and |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | The Cordis business of Cardinal Health, Inc. (USA, ‘Cordis’), controlled by Cardinal Health, Inc. (USA, ‘Cardinal Health’). |

H&F acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Cordis.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of stocks and assets.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | H&F is a private equity firm with investments in a variety of sectors worldwide. |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Cordis develops and supplies interventional vascular technology worldwide. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2021170EN.01000701-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10246 - Hellman & Friedman/Cordis

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2021170EN.01000701-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2021170EN.01000701-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
# C_2010264EN.01002701.xml

| 29.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 264/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 264/27

---

Statement of revenue and expenditure for the Trans-European Transport Network Executive Agency for the financial year 2010 — Amending Budget No 1

(2010/C 264/07)

EXPENDITURE

| Title
  Chapter | Heading | Appropriations 2010 | Amending budget No 1 | New amount |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 |
| STAFF EXPENDITURES |
| 1 1 | SALARIES AND ALLOWANCES | 6 407 000 | – 236 000 | 6 171 000 |
| 1 4 | SOCIO, INFRASTRUCTURE AND TRAINING | 230 000 | 17 000 | 247 000 |
| | Title 1 — Total | 6 824 500 | – 219 000 | 6 605 500 |
| 2 |
| INFRASTRUCTURE AND OPERATING EXPENDITURES |
| 2 0 | OFFICES | 1 659 000 | 211 500 | 1 870 500 |
| 2 1 | COMPUTER EQUIPMENT PURCHASE AND MAINTENANCE | 490 000 | –59 000 | 431 000 |
| 2 2 | GOODS, PIECES OF FURNITURE AND INCIDENTAL EXPENSES | 50 000 | 16 000 | 66 000 |
| 2 4 | TELECOMMUNICATION AND EXPENSES OF POSTING | 50 000 | –9 000 | 41 000 |
| | Title 2 — Total | 2 337 500 | 159 500 | 2 497 000 |
| 3 |
| TECHNICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT EXPENDITURES |
| 3 2 | INFORMATION AND PUBLICATIONS | 130 000 | 7 000 | 137 000 |
| 3 3 | OTHER TECHNICAL EXPENSES AND OF ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT | 477 000 | 52 500 | 529 500 |
| | Title 3 — Total | 632 000 | 59 500 | 691 500 |
| | GRAND TOTAL | 9 794 000 | 0 | 9 794 000 |

Title

Chapter

Heading

Appropriations 2010

Amending budget No 1

New amount

1

1

STAFF EXPENDITURES

STAFF EXPENDITURES

1 1

SALARIES AND ALLOWANCES

6 407 000

– 236 000

6 171 000

1 4

SOCIO, INFRASTRUCTURE AND TRAINING

230 000

17 000

247 000

Title 1 — Total

Title 1 — Total

6 824 500

6 824 500

– 219 000

– 219 000

6 605 500

6 605 500

2

2

INFRASTRUCTURE AND OPERATING EXPENDITURES

INFRASTRUCTURE AND OPERATING EXPENDITURES

2 0

OFFICES

1 659 000

211 500

1 870 500

2 1

COMPUTER EQUIPMENT PURCHASE AND MAINTENANCE

490 000

–59 000

431 000

2 2

GOODS, PIECES OF FURNITURE AND INCIDENTAL EXPENSES

50 000

16 000

66 000

2 4

TELECOMMUNICATION AND EXPENSES OF POSTING

50 000

–9 000

41 000

Title 2 — Total

Title 2 — Total

2 337 500

2 337 500

159 500

159 500

2 497 000

2 497 000

3

3

TECHNICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT EXPENDITURES

TECHNICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT EXPENDITURES

3 2

INFORMATION AND PUBLICATIONS

130 000

7 000

137 000

3 3

OTHER TECHNICAL EXPENSES AND OF ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT

477 000

52 500

529 500

Title 3 — Total

Title 3 — Total

632 000

632 000

59 500

59 500

691 500

691 500

GRAND TOTAL

GRAND TOTAL

9 794 000

9 794 000

0

0

9 794 000

9 794 000

---