alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

The National Science Board's (NSB) Committee on External Engagement hereby gives notice of the scheduling of a teleconference for the transaction of National Science Board business pursuant to the National Science Foundation Act and the Government in the Sunshine Act.

# TIME AND DATE:

Wednesday, September 8, 2021, from 1:00-2:00 p.m. EDT.

# PLACE:

This meeting will be held by teleconference through the National Science Foundation.

# STATUS:

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

The agenda of the teleconference is to plan NSB engagement activities for the fall and winter.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

                        Point of contact for this meeting is: Nadine Lymn,                         *nlymn@nsf.gov,*                         703/292-7000. To listen to this teleconference, members of the public must send an email to                         *nationalsciencebrd@nsf.gov*                         at least 24 hours prior to the teleconference. The National Science Board Office will send requesters a toll-free dial-in number. Meeting information and updates may be found at the National Science Board website at                         *www.nsf.gov/​nsb.*

Chris Blair,

Executive Assistant to the National Science Board Office.

[FR Doc. 2021-19145 Filed 8-31-21; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

City of Pittsburgh, :

Petitioner :

:

v. : No. 1431 C.D. 2021

:

Ronald Dobbs (Workers’ :

Compensation Appeal Board), :

Respondent :

PER CURIAM O R D E R

NOW, March 27, 2023, upon consideration of Respondent’s

application for reargument, and Petitioner’s answer in response thereto, the 

application is DENIED.
#### BRAYMAN, Appellant, v. STEPHENS et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 16, 1896.)

Action by Martha Brayman against William E. Stephens and others, as executors of David W. Langley, deceased.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 19

- 60664 Summary Calendar

**Pritpal Singh,**

Petitioner **,**

versus

**Robert M. Wilkinson,** Acting U.S. Attorney General **,** Respondent

**.**

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A200 240 824

Before **Wiener, Southwick,** and **Duncan,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** * Pritpal Singh, a native and citizen of India , petitions for review of an order by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal from the denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). He challenges the BIA’s

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 9, 2021 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-60664 Document: 00515772631 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/09/2021No. 19

- 60664

2 decision that he lacked credibility and its failure to address whether he was entitled to asylum, withhol ding of removal, or protection under the CAT. To
the extent that he claims that the immigration judge relied too heavily on the credible fear report in determining that he lacked credibility , this claim is unexhausted and therefore we lack jurisdiction to address it. See Wang

v. Ashcroft , 260 F.3d 448, 452

- 53 (5th Cir. 2001)

. We review the BIA’s decision and consider the immigration judge’s decision only to the extent it influenced the BIA. Singh v. Sessions , 880 F.3d 220, 224 (5th Cir. 2018). Factual findings, including an adverse credibility determination, are reviewed for substantial evidence. Avelar

- Oliva v. Barr , 954 F.3d 757, 763 (5th Cir. 2020)

. Despite Singh’s assertions to the contrary, the immigration judge’s determination was supported by specific reasons based on the evidence presented and was, under the totality of the circumstances, substantially
reasonable. See Zhang v. Gonzales , 432 F.3d 339, 344 (5th Cir. 2005)

. Because the adverse credibility determination was supported by “ specif ic and cogent reasons ,” the record does not compel a finding that Singh was
credible or that no reasonable factfinder could have made an adverse credibility finding. See id. ; Singh v. Sessions , 880 F.3d 220, 225 (5th Cir.

20 18 ) . Accordingly, the lack of credible evidence precluded Singh from meeting his burden of proof for asylum , withholding of removal , and protection under the CAT

. See Dayo v. Holder , 687 F.3d 653, 658

- 59 (5th Cir. 2012)

. For the foregoing reasons, the petition for revie w is **DENIED** in part and **DISMISSED** in part

. Case: 19-60664 Document: 00515772631 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/09/2021
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 174 (Monday, September 13, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 50927]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19664]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #17127 and #17128; Missouri Disaster Number MO-
00111]


Presidential Declaration of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of Missouri

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Missouri (FEMA-
4612-DR), dated 09/01/2021.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Straight-line Winds, Tornadoes, and 
Flooding.
    Incident Period: 06/24/2021 through 07/01/2021.

DATES: Issued on 09/01/2021.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/01/2021.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/01/2022.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 09/01/2021, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Andrew, Audrain, Boone, Buchanan, Caldwell, Callaway, 
Carroll, Chariton, Clinton, Cooper, Daviess, Grundy, Holt, Howard, 
Lincoln, Livingston, Moniteau, Montgomery, Ralls, Ray, Saline.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
    Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere.      2.000
    Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available              2.000
     Elsewhere...............................................
For Economic Injury:
    Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available              2.000
     Elsewhere...............................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 17127 B 
and for economic injury is 17128 0.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2021-19664 Filed 9-10-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2183 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2183

   To require the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to 
   consider Brunswick County, North Carolina, to be part of the same 
      metropolitan statistical area as Wilmington, North Carolina.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 30, 2015

  Mr. Rouzer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to 
   consider Brunswick County, North Carolina, to be part of the same 
      metropolitan statistical area as Wilmington, North Carolina.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BRUNSWICK COUNTY.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for 
the purpose of the delineation of metropolitan statistical areas, the 
Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall consider 
Brunswick County, North Carolina, to be part of the same metropolitan 
statistical area that contains Wilmington, North Carolina.
    (b) Sunset.--Subsection (a) shall cease to be effective on January 
1, 2021.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

Informational Addendum to Report on Form 10-Q

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

Not Filed Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

The undersigned Chief Executive Officer of OYO Geospace Corporation does hereby certify as follows:

Solely for the purpose of meeting the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and solely to the extent this certification may
be applicable to this Report on Form 10-Q, the undersigned hereby certify that this Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in this
Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OYO Geospace Corporation.



/s/ Gary D. OwensName:

Gary D. OwensTitle:

Chief Executive OfficerAugust 8, 2008
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8  No.  333-12945  and 333-47253) pertaining to the Employees' Savings Plan of
RockShox,  Inc.  of  our  report  dated  April  24,  2000,  with  respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of RockShox, Inc. included in the
Annual  Report  (Form  10-K)  for  the  year  ended  March  31,  2000.

                               /s/  Ernst  &  Young  LLP

San  Francisco,  California
June   27  ,  2000
      ---


                                       56
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED, PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

In connection with the Annual Report of Document Sciences Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, John L. McGannon, in my capacity as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                                                       
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 31, 2006 |  | /s/    JOHN L.
MCGANNON                               
|                      |  | John L. McGannon President and Chief Executive Officer
#### In the Matter of David Sperling, Respondent, v Gladis Sperling, Appellant.

[946 NYS2d 877]

In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, Gladis Sperling appeals from an order of protection of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Burke, Ct. Atty. Ref.), dated June 6, 2011, which, after a hearing, and, in effect, upon a finding that she had committed the family offense of harassment in the second degree, directed her, inter alia, to stay away from the petitioner until and including June 6, 2013.

Ordered that the order of protection is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court failed to state on the record the facts which it deemed essential to its determination to grant the petition for an order of protection *(see*CPLR 4213 [b]; *Matter of Jose L.I.,*46 NY2d 1024, 1025-1026 [1979]; *Matter of Drury v Drury,*90 AD3d 754, 755 [2011]; *Matter of Smith v Falco-Boric,*87 AD3d 1146, 1147 [2011]). However, remittal to the Family Court is not necessary because the record is sufficient for this Court to conduct an independent review of the evidence *(see Matter of Jose L. I.,*46 NY2d at 1026; *Matter of Drury v Drury,*90 AD3d at 755; *Matter of Smith v Falco-Boric,*87 AD3d at 1147; *Matter of Destiny H. [Valerie B.],*83 AD3d 939 [2011]). The evidence adduced at the hearing established, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the wife committed the family offense of harassment in the second degree, warranting the issuance of an order of protection *(see*Family Ct Act §§ 812, 832; Penal Law § 240.26 [1]; *Matter of Genzen v Genzen,*74 AD3d 1196 [2010]; *Barbara E. v John E.,*44 AD3d 426, 427 [2007]; *Matter of Jessica C. v Esteban B.,*13 AD3d 183 [2004]).

Moreover, contrary to the wife’s contention, under the circumstances of this case, the Family Court’s failure to hold a dispositional hearing prior to issuing a two-year order of protection does not require reversal *(see Matter of Sblendorio v*
      *1068
      *D’Agostino,*60 AD3d 773, 773-774 [2009]; *Matter of Hassett v Hassett,*4 AD3d 527 [2004]; *Matter of Dabbene v Dabbene,*297 AD2d 812 [2002]; *Matter of Annie C. v Marcellus*W., 278 AD2d 177, 177-178 [2000]; *Matter of Quintana v Quintana,*237 AD2d 130 [1997]). In addition, upon the exercise of our factual review power, the Family Court’s disposition awarding the husband a two-year order of protection was not against the weight of the evidence (see *Matter of Sblendorio v D'Agostino,*60 AD3d at 774; *Barbara E. v John E.,*44 AD3d at 427). Skelos, J.P., Dickerson, Leventhal and Roman, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET, STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS, STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND NOTES THERETO
INCORPORATED IN PART II, ITEM 7 OF THIS FORM 10-KSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       2,570,188
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    114,972
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               241,250
<PP&E>                                         196,253
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,420,193
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          665,740
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,500
<COMMON>                                        21,150
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,703,181
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,420,193
<SALES>                                      6,104,905
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,104,905
<CGS>                                        2,815,210
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,815,210
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,163,455
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,732
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                124,508
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (34,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   158,508
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10


</TABLE>
#### Sonia Rosario et al., Respondents, et al., Plaintiffs, v Diagonal Realty, LLC, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Submitted March 26, 2007;

decided March 29, 2007

Motion by Pratt Center for Community Development for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted. Two copies of the brief may be served and 24 copies filed within seven days.
#### MECHANICS’ & TRADERS’ BANK v. STAHL et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

December 22, 1896.)

Action by the Mechanics’ & Traders’ Bank against Abraham M. Stahl and others.

No opinion. Motion granted, with $10 costs.
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Tim Paterson-Brown, Chief Executive Officer of Medicsight, Inc. (the“Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)                                  theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period endedJune 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)                                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|            | By:    | /s/ TIM  PATERSON-BROWN |   |
|-----------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|            |   | Tim Paterson-Brown      |
|            |   | Chief Executive Officer |
| August 10, 2006 |   |

 

----
----

**EXHIBIT      32.1**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                            |   |   | 247MGI,                Inc.                                                                                                                   |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                            |   |   |                                                                                                                                          |   |   |
| January                10, 2008 |   |   | By:                /s/ Matthew P. Dwyer                                                                                                       |   |
|                            |   |   | Matthew                P. Dwyer, CEO principal executive officer and principal financial                and                accounting officer |

----
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10** 
**- 1286** 

ANGEL DE LEON ,

P etitioner ,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. , Attorney General , Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

.

Submitted : August 25, 2010 Decided: September 3, 2010

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Hug o Cesar Castro, Rockville, Maryland , for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney Gener al, William C. Peachey, Assistant Director, Rebecca Hoffberg , Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent

.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Angel De Leon, a native and citizen of Guatemala , petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigratio n
Appeals (“Board”) dismissing his appeal from the immigration
judge’s denial of his application for adjustment of status. We

have r eviewed the record and the Board’s order and affirm the
denial of relief for the reasons stated by the Board. In re: De

Leon (B.I.A. Feb. 25, 2010); see Ramirez v. Holder , 609 F.3d

331 , 335

- 37 (4th Cir. 2010) (holding that an alien who is

inadmissible und er 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(9)(C)(i)(I) (2006) is
ineligible for adjustment of status pursuant to 8 U.S.C.

§ 1255(i) (2006))

. Accordingly, we deny the petition for
review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately pr esented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

PETITION DENIED