alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

** **

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Blount International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joshua L. Collins,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(i)            The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periodsexpressed in the report.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to BlountInternational, Inc. and will be retained by Blount International, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

 
| Date: May 6, 2010  |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |   |
|                    |   |
| /s/ Joshua L. Collins   |   |
| Joshua L. Collins       |   |
| President and           |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
#### In the Matter of Polo Park Civic Association et al., Appellants, v John Kiernan, as Supervisor of the Town of North Hempstead, et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, *inter alia,*to compel the respondents John Kiernan and Town Board of the Town of North Hempstead to object to the proposed establishment of a community residence for mentally disabled persons, to request an immediate hearing pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 41.34, and to prohibit the issuance of a certificate for the operation of the community residence, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brucia, J.), dated April 7, 1987, which, *inter alia,*dismissed the petition.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

On June 13, 1986, the respondent John Kiernan, Supervisor of the Town of North Hempstead, received notification that the respondent Epilepsy Foundation of Nassau County (hereinafter EFNC) desired to establish a certain community residence for mentally disabled persons in the Town of North Hempstead. The town subsequently declined to submit a formal response within 40 days of the receipt of the notice pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 41.34 (c) (1). By letter dated July 29, 1986, EFNC advised Kiernan that it would proceed with the development of the facility. The petitioners, an association of owners, residents, and occupants of homes located in the immediate vicinity of the proposed site, thereupon requested that the town formally object to the establishment of the residence. The petitioners further requested that an immediate hearing be held before the respondent commissioner to determine whether the establishment of such a facility would create an overconcentration of similar facilities in the proximity of the proposed site, and whether the nature and character of the community would be substantially altered thereby. The town, however, did not respond to the request, whereupon the petitioners commenced the instant proceeding on or about October 31, 1986. The court thereafter dismissed the petition for failure to state a cause of action.

*117We conclude that the court properly dismissed the petition. Pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 41.34 (c) (1), EFNC was entitled to establish the proposed facility upon the failure of the town to submit a formal response within 40 days of receipt of the notice *(see, Matter of Town of Stony Point v New York State Off. of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities,*78 AD2d 858). The decision by the town not to respond was clearly a discretionary act, and mandamus will not lie to review such a determination *(see, Klostermann v Cuomo,*61 NY2d 525). The petitioners’ remaining contentions, including their constitutional challenge to the subject law, do not compel us to reach a different result. Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Kunzeman and Harwood, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.31

                        ADDENDUM TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


         The Employment Agreement between The viaLink Company ("viaLink") and
J. Andrew Kerner dated the 1st day of April, 1999 is amended as follows:

1.   Effective as of the tenth day of March, 2000, J. Andrew Kerner's title
     shall be changed to Senior Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial
     Officer.

2.   Effective as of the tenth day of March, 2000, the annualized salary set
     forth in Section 4.1 of said Employment Agreement shall be increased to
     two hundred thirty eight thousand five hundred dollars ($238,500).

3.   The first sentence of Section 6.1 shall be deleted and replaced with the
     following sentence: "Except as hereinafter set forth, the term ("Term) of
     this Agreement shall commence on the 9th day of April, 1999 ("Effective
     Date and shall continue through the 25th day of May, 2001 and shall be
     automatically renewed on a year to year basis thereafter unless one party
     hereto notifies the other party hereto in writing at least thirty (30)
     days prior to the end of the then current Term that it will not renew this
     Agreement at the end of such then current Term."

4.   Except as amended herein, no further changes are made to the Employment
     Agreement and the same remains in full force and effect.


The viaLink Company                               J. Andrew Kerner



By:
     -------------------------                    ------------------------------
       Lewis B. Kilbourne                         J. Andrew Kerner

Its:   Chief Executive Officer


Date:                                             Date:
     -------------------------                         -------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          16,270
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,333,517
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (345,746)
<INVENTORY>                                    982,241
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,986,282
<PP&E>                                         177,808
<DEPRECIATION>                                  42,524
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,293,363
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,832,573
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        44,600
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,416,190
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,293,363
<SALES>                                        867,644
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               867,644
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               932,031
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               345,746
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              96,181
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (406,314)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (163,350)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (242,964)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (242,964)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)
        

</TABLE>
#### LOVELL, Respondent, v. JACOBS, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fifth Department.

March 27, 1894.)

Action by Frank H. Lovell against George W. Jacobs.

Argued before DWIGHT, P. J., and LEWIS, HAIGHT, and BRADLEY, JJ.

No opinion. Judgment appealed from affirmed, with costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED NOTES OF AMERIN CORPORATION AND
SUBSIDIARIES FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           388,697
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 394,723
<CASH>                                           7,467
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           8,998
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 439,574
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 35,407
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             22,999
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           262
<OTHER-SE>                                     362,234
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   439,574
<PREMIUMS>                                      27,609
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              5,088
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 430
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                       9,334
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      3,939
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             3,175
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,679
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,729
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,950
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,950
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .45
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of LaSalle Re Holdings Limited (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, W.
Marston Becker, Acting Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18, U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ W. Marston Becker

W. Marston Becker
Acting Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2002
Invasive Fish Surveillance, 

Grand Canyon National Park 

GCDAMP- TWG, November 8, 2023 Photo and design

- Amy Martin 
 

 

 

 

 

 

2023 GRCA Invasives Surveillance 

• Paria River to Badger Rapid (PBR)

• Boat electrofishing- 5 trips between June and October, 2 trips upcoming 

• Seining- 6 trips between May and October, , 2 trips upcoming 

• Lees Ferry to Diamond Creek- 1 in June 

• Seining 

• Backpack electrofishing 

• Lees Ferry to Phantom Ranch

• September- seining 

• October- backpack electrofishing, seining, preliminary eDNA sampling 

• November (in process)- boat electrofishing, systematic eDNA sampling 

• Lava Chuar Slough, RM 66.1- TBD 

2023 Funding: Bureau of Reclamation, 

Inflation Reduction Act, Grand Canyon 

Conservancy, NPS Photo Bryan Smith 
SPECIES CAPTURES 

BLACK BULLHEAD 6 

BLUEGILL 17 

BLACK CRAPPIE 5 

BROWN TROUT 27 

UNIDENTIFIED 

CATFISH 5 

CHANNEL CATFISH 24 

COMMON CARP 47 

FATHEAD MINNOW 3790 

GREEN SUNFISH 1474 

GIZZARD SHAD 19 

MOSQUITO FISH 

PLAINS KILLIFISH 

357 

184 

RAINBOW TROUT 26 

RED SHINER 153 

SMALLMOUTH BASS 13 

STRIPED BASS 21 

THREADFIN SHAD 5 

WALLEYE 19 

YELLOW BULLHEAD 1 

2023 GRCA 

Invasive Captures 

Beneficial Use- invasives are collected for scientific 

study (ex: otoliths), human consumption, tribal 

ceremonial animals 
SMB (13) 

RMs 1.9-3.9= 3 

6-6.4= 3 

8-11= 1 

14-17= 4 

44-47= 1 

37-144 mm* 
WAL (19) 

RMs 64= 1 

182- 213= 16 

269= 2 

42- 342 mm 
STB (21) 

RMs 4.6= 1 

45-65.6= 16 

172-255= 4 

25- 450* mm 
 

GSF (1474) 

RMs 0-7.5= 168 

16.5- 19.4= 11 

39.5- 88.6= 1253 

123- 252= 34 

LCR= 2 

BAC= 5 

6-164 mm 

Lava Chuar 

Slough: 

1153 GSF 

2650 FHM 
-

 

More than 90% of all 

Humpback Chub 

live in Grand Canyon and in 

the Little Colorado River! 

Photo David Herasimtschuk, Freshwaters Illustrated 

Data from Daniel Leavitt, USFWS 
 

 

2023 GLCA & GRCA 

Nonnative Captures by Month 

Month/ Species BGS BKC CCF GSF LMB SMB STB WAL 

Feb 37 1 290 12 

Mar 1 3 1 

Apr 7 1 63 1 4 

May 74 1 337 2 13 2 19 

Jun 57 2 799 28 2 9 

Jul 120 1 21 2867 577 6 13 

Aug 69 3750 410 2 

Sep 24 2 1 1338 41 8 3 

Oct 68 1 2 3209 108 6 6 

2023 total 457 9 24 12656 3 1194 24 52
Page 1 – DEFENDANT’S EXHIBIT LIST

Ruben L. Iñiguez

Assistant Federal Public Defender

101 SW Main Street, Suite 1700

Portland, OR 97204

Tel: (503) 326-2123

Fax: (503) 326-5524

Email: ruben_iniguez@fd.org

Advisory Counsel for Pro Se Defendant

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

WINSTON SHROUT,

Defendant.

Case No. 3:15-cr-00438-JO

DEFENDANT’S EXHIBIT LIST

The pro se defendant, Winston Shrout, through advisory counsel, Ruben L. 

Iñiguez, submits this Exhibit List, attached hereto, to assist the Court during the trial of 

this matter.

//

Case 3:15-cr-00438-JO Document 93 Filed 04/14/17 Page 1 of 4
Page 2 – DEFENDANT’S EXHIBIT LIST

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 14th day of April, 2017.

/s/ Ruben L. Iñiguez

Ruben L. Iñiguez

Advisory Counsel for Pro Se Defendant

Case 3:15-cr-00438-JO Document 93 Filed 04/14/17 Page 2 of 4
Page 3 – DEFENDANT’S EXHIBIT LIST

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on April 14, 2017, I electronically filed the foregoing with 

the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such 

filing to the attorney(s) of record for the plaintiff.

/s/ Neysa Bogar

Neysa Bogar

Legal Assistant

Case 3:15-cr-00438-JO Document 93 Filed 04/14/17 Page 3 of 4
Page 4 – DEFENDANT’S EXHIBIT LIST

UNITED STATES v. WINSTON SHROUT

CASE NO. 3:15-cr-00438-JO

DEFENDANT’S EXHIBIT LIST

Exhibit 

No.

Description Format

1 Video Clip (“Meet Winston...”) from Winston Shrout Solutions in 

Commerce (www.wssic.com), Official YouTube Channel**

MP4

2 Letter of Appointment and Commission for Winston Shrout, 

Notary Exequatur, Office of International Treasury Control, 

May 26, 2010

PDF

3 United States’ Answer and Claim, 

Diversified Metal Products, Inc. v. T-Bow Company Trust, et al., 

Civil No. 93-405-E-EJL

PDF

4 Certification of Jeffrey W. Bullock, Secretary of State, Delaware,

Incorporation of Internal Revenue Tax and Audit Service, Inc.,

March 17, 2011

PDF

** A transcript is currently being prepared. It will be submitted to the Court and counsel on Monday, 

April 17, 2017.

Case 3:15-cr-00438-JO Document 93 Filed 04/14/17 Page 4 of 4
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
                     
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                            20,892
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             2,960
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                       0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                       0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       13,230
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           302,999
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             293,969
<LOANS>                                        1,122,509
<ALLOWANCE>                                        4,356    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,512,605
<DEPOSITS>                                     1,148,866
<SHORT-TERM>                                      54,310
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               30,975
<LONG-TERM>                                       80,605
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           2,013
<OTHER-SE>                                       195,836
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 1,512,605
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   64,604
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 15,328
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     243
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  80,175
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                38,053
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                44,579
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             35,596
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       (766)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                     0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   18,294
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   22,450
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        14,020
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                      14,020
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0.87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.86
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                      3.28
<LOANS-NON>                                        1,831
<LOANS-PAST>                                           0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                       0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                        0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   4,181
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                         67
<RECOVERIES>                                       1,561
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  4,356
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               4,356
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                0
        


</TABLE>
#### Lakeshore Assembly of God Church, Respondent, v Village Board of the Village of Westfield et al., Appellants.

Memorandum: Special Term erred in annulling the determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals and substituting its discretion for that of the Board. Courts should not disturb the determination of zoning authorities unless they are illegal, arbitrary and capricious, or an abuse of discretion *(see, Matter of Fuhst v Foley,*45 NY2d 441, 444; *Conley v Town of Brookhaven Zoning Bd. of Appeals,*40 NY2d 309, 314). Petitioner’s argument that the Board’s determination is in violation of its 1st Amendment right to the free exercise of its religion is without merit. Petitioner is not prevented from religious use of its property, only limited in the size of the sign which it seeks to erect. It is wholly appropriate to impose limitations on a church property and its accessory uses when reasonably related to the general welfare of the community, including the community’s interest in preserving its appearance *(see, Jewish Reconstructionist Synagogue v Incorporated Vil. of Roslyn Harbor,*38 NY2d 283, 288-289, *cert denied*426 US 950; *Matter of Diocese of Rochester v Planning Bd.,*1 NY2d 508, 526). The absence of specific guidelines governing erection of signs ancillary to a church use in a residential zone does not deprive the Board of discretion to impose reasonable restrictions. The Board’s general authority to interpret the regulations to achieve the overall intent of the ordinance implies the power to impose reasonable regulations upon a special use. Finally, the restrictions imposed were not arbitrary and capricious. The Board merely limited the size of petitioner’s sign to 20 square feet and approved it in all other respects. Such determination reflects a reasonable accommodation of the church’s request *973with the concerns of the neighbors as to aesthetic and safety considerations. As such, it was a reasonable exercise of the Board’s discretion. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Chautauqua County, Adams, J. — art 78.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Denman, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.