alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2011156DE.01001202.xml

| 15.6.2011 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 156/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2011

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 156/12

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung Nr. 1222/2009 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 25. November 2009 über die Kennzeichnung von Reifen in Bezug auf die Kraftstoffeffizienz und andere wesentliche Parameter

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 342 vom 22. Dezember 2009
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 342 vom 22. Dezember 2009

Im Inhaltsverzeichnis auf der Titelseite des Amtsblatts und im Titel auf Seite 46:

anstatt:

muss es heißen:

Auf Seite 49, Artikel 5 Absatz 3:

anstatt:

„(3)   für Reifen der Klassen C1, C2 und C3 geben die Lieferanten auf oder zusammen mit den Rechnungen, die sie den Endnutzern beim Reifenkauf ausstellen, die Kraftstoffeffizienzklasse, den Messwert für das externe Rollgeräusch sowie gegebenenfalls die Nasshaftungsklasse gemäß Anhang I an.“

muss es heißen:

„(3)   Für Reifen der Klassen C1, C2 und C3 geben die Händler auf oder zusammen mit den Rechnungen, die sie den Endnutzern beim Reifenkauf ausstellen, die Kraftstoffeffizienzklasse, den Messwert für das externe Rollgeräusch sowie gegebenenfalls die Nasshaftungsklasse gemäß Anhang I an.“.

---
# C_2021184EN.01000101.xml

| 12.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10237 — Bridgepoint/Infinigate)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 184/01)

On 6 May 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10237. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10237. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

MICHAEL JAMES, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF 

PHILADELPHIA COUNTY; AND COURT 

OF COMMON PLEAS PRESIDENT 

JUDGE OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY; 

AND COURT ADMINISTRATOR OF 

COMMON PLEAS COURT OF 

PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, 

 Respondents 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 29 EM 2015 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 12th day of May, 2015, the Application Leave to File Leave 

Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus are GRANTED. 

The Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County has failed to comply with the 

remand order of the Superior Court. See Commonwealth v. James, 116 EDA 2009 

(December 14, 2009). The common pleas court is DIRECTED to adjudicate the 

remanded Post Conviction Relief Act matter within 60 days. 

The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to serve the Commonwealth with a copy of this 

order.
ANIMAS RIVER AT DURANGO, CO.Latitude: 37.279Longitude: -107.88Elevation: 6519

ANIMAS RIVER AT DURANGO, CO.

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Beartown Site Page...



Beartown

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Cascade Site Page...



Cascade

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Cascade #2 Site Page...



Cascade #2

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Idarado Site Page...



Idarado

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Mineral Creek Site Page...



Mineral Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Molas Lake Site Page...



Molas Lake

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Red Mountain Pass Site Page...



Red Mountain Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Scotch Creek Site Page...



Scotch Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Spud Mountain Site Page...



Spud Mountain

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Columbus Basin Site Page...



Columbus Basin
NRCS 1000 - ANNIE SPRINGSLatitude: 42.87Longitude: -122.165Elevation: None

NRCS 1000 - Annie Springs

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Annie Springs Site Page...



Annie Springs

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Sun Pass Site Page...



Sun Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Sevenmile Marsh Site Page...



Sevenmile Marsh
Exhibit 32.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned officers of Univision Communications
Inc. (the Company), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, to their knowledge:

(i) The annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 of the Company, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |  |  |                         |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                      |  |  | 
|Dated: March 27, 2008 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    JOSEPH UVA      
|                      |  |  |  |  |  |                         |  | Joseph Uva             
|                      |  |  |  |  |  |                         |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                      |  |  | 
|Dated: March 27, 2008 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    ANDREW W. HOBSON
|                      |  |  |  |  |  |                         |  | Andrew W. Hobson       
|                      |  |  |  |  |  |                         |  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northwest Pipe Company (the Company)
on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard A. Roman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/S/ RICHARD A. ROMAN                 
|Richard A. Roman                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|April 27, 2012
Exhibit
10.17 


 


TRIPARTITE
AGREEMENT


 


Party
A: EIGATE (HONG KONG) TECHNOLOGY CO., LIMITED, company number 51739757, a company incorporated in Hong Kong.


 


Party
B: DEC (HK) TECHNOLOGY CO., LIMITED, company number 59528508, a company incorporated in Hong Kong.


 


Party C: ASPIRE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
LIMITED, company number 67021586, a company
incorporated in Hong Kong.


 


Whereas,


 


Party
A and Party B signed a Loan Agreement Contract on 20th September 2018, that Party B agreed to lend a total sum of USD 30,000,000
to Party A.


 


Party
A and Party C signed a Loan Agreement Contract on 1st September 2018, that Party A agreed to lend a total sum of USD
80,000,000 to Party C. A Supplemental Agreement to Loan Agreement signed on 24th September 2018 between Party A and LIU TUANFANG
(HKID number M826820(2)), the sole director of Party A and Party C, specified that USD 50,000,000 out of the above-mentioned USD 80,000,000
loan being the personal loan from LIU TUANFANG to Party C. The residual USD 30,000,000 loan remained as company loan from Party A to
Party C.


 


In
light of above loan agreement arrangements, Party A, Party B and Party C hereby agrees that, regarding making the USD 80,000,000 loan
available to Party C, Party B to directly issue USD 30,000,000 loan principal to Party C, while Party A to issue the residual USD 50,000,000
loan principal to Party C, as fulfillment of above loan agreement arrangements.


 






     


     


    

 


	Agree
    and accepted by:	 
	 	 
	EIGATE
    (HONG KONG) TECHNOLOGY CO., LIMITED	 
	 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	Date:
    24th September 2018	 
	 	 
	Agree
    and accepted by:	 
	 	 
	DEC
    (HK) TECHNOLOGY CO., LIMITED	 
	 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	Date:
    24th September 2018	 
	 	 
	Agree
    and accepted by:	 
	 	 
	ASPIRE
    SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY LIMITED	 
	 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	Date:
    24th September 2018
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

ROMEN JUNICHOLAS CALLAWAY, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-598 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed June 7, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Philip J. Federico, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Rocco J. Carbone, III, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Helene S. Parnes, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, SILBERMAN, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
Skip to main content

Privacy Policy•Site map

# Judicial Conduct Opinions 2022

CL-22-90290

CL-22-90291

CL-22-90292

CL-22-90293

CL-22-90294

CL-22-90295

CL-22-90296

CL-22-90297

CL-22-90298

CL-22-90299

CL-22-90300

CL-22-90301

CL-22-90302

CL-22-90303

CL-22-90304

CL-22-90305

CL-22-90306

CL-22-90307

CL-22-90308

CL-22-90309

CL-22-90310

CL-22-90311

CL-22-90312

CL-22-90313

CL-22-90314

CL-22-90315

CL-22-90316

CL-22-90317

CL-22-90318

CL-22-90319

CL-22-90320

CL-22-90321

CL-22-90322

CL-22-90323

CL-22-90324

CL-22-90325

CL-22-90326

CL-22-90327

CL-22-90328

CL-22-90329

CL-22-90330

CL-22-90331

CL-22-90332

CL-22-90333

CL-22-90334

CL-22-90335

CL-22-90336

CL-22-90337

CL-22-90338

CL-22-90339

CL-22-90340

CL-22-90341

CL-22-90342

CL-22-90343

CL-22-90344

CL-22-90345

CL-22-90346

CL-22-90347

CL-22-90348

CL-22-90349

CL-22-90350

Howard T. Markey National Courts Building • 717 Madison Place, NW, Washington, DC 20439 • 202-357-6400
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We  hereby  consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the Registration
Statements  on  Form  S-8 (No. 333-12945 and 333-47253) of RockShox, Inc. of our
report  dated April 27, 1999 relating to the financial statements, which appears
in  this  Annual  Report  on  Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report dated April 27, 1999 relating to the financial statement
schedule,  which  appears  in  this  Form  10-K.


/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP


San  Jose,  California
July  16,  2001



<PAGE>
#### Cynthia H. Lehman, Appellant, v Robert O. Lehman, Respondent.

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Kenneth Shorter, J.), entered on June 3, 1986, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Motion by defendant-respondent to strike certain portions of plaintiff-appellant’s reply brief denied. No opinion. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Ross, Carro and Kassal, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM COMPANY'S
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF INCOME TAXES AND IS 
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.     
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001001185                        
<NAME>                        IDX SYSTEMS COPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                           <C>                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1998         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1998         JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-1998         SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                         1                   1
<CASH>                             18,509              19,930
<SECURITIES>                      109,954             101,017 
<RECEIVABLES>                      82,259              55,252
<ALLOWANCES>                       (1,386)             (1,209)
<INVENTORY>                             0                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  221,750             181,759
<PP&E>                             64,079              51,863
<DEPRECIATION>                     33,521              25,219
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    268,372             215,677
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              52,150              44,727
<BONDS>                                 0               2,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0                   0
<COMMON>                              265                 257  
<OTHER-SE>                        207,238             163,449
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      268,372             215,677
<SALES>                           235,459             181,589
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  235,459             181,589
<CGS>                             120,060              94,637
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      82,436              86,523
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      118                 592
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     48                  99
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    36,963               4,583
<INCOME-TAX>                       15,990               3,566
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                20,973               1,017
<DISCONTINUED>                          0                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0                   0
<CHANGES>                               0                   0
<NET-INCOME>                       20,973               1,017
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        0.80                0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                        0.77                0.04   
        


</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

JAMES MOON, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 20-10382 

D.C. No. 1:13-cr-00244-DKW-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Hawaii

Derrick K. Watson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 18, 2021**

Before: CANBY, FRIEDLAND, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

James Moon appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for 

compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have jurisdiction 

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Moon contends the district court erred in treating U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13 as a 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We, therefore, grant 

appellant’s motion to expedite submission without oral argument.

FILED

MAY 24 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 20-10382 

binding policy statement. Though we recently held that district courts may not 

treat § 1B1.13 as binding in evaluating a compassionate release motion brought by 

a prisoner, see United States v. Aruda, 993 F.3d 797, 802 (9th Cir. 2021), we 

disagree with Moon that the district court did so here. While the court cited 

§ 1B1.13, nothing in the record supports Moon’s argument that the court 

improperly limited its review to only those factors set forth in the guideline. 

Rather, the court conducted the “holistic review of the totality of the circumstances 

and a determination of whether extraordinary and compelling reasons counsel 

compassion” Moon argues is required, and reasonably concluded that the factors 

listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) did not support a reduction. See 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(1)(A). The court did not misconstrue or misapply the legal standard, and 

it properly considered the seriousness of Moon’s offense against his laudable 

personal history and significant rehabilitation efforts. The court did not abuse its 

discretion in denying relief. See Aruda, 993 F.3d at 799; see also United States v. 

Robertson, 895 F.3d 1206, 1213 (9th Cir. 2018) (district court abuses its discretion 

only if its decision is illogical, implausible, or not supported by the record). 

AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. AD21-10-000]

As first announced in the Notice of Technical Conference issued in this proceeding on July 14, 2021, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) will convene a staff-led technical conference in the above-referenced proceeding on October 12, 2021, from approximately 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Eastern time. The conference will be held remotely. Attached to this Supplemental Notice is an agenda for the technical conference. Commissioners may attend and participate in the technical conference.

The conference will be open for the public to attend remotely. There is no fee for attendance. Information on this technical conference, including a link to the webcast, will be posted on the conference's event page on the Commission's website (*https://www.ferc.gov/​news-events/​events/​technical-conference-regarding-energy-and-ancillary-services-markets-10122021*) prior to the event. The conference will be transcribed. Transcripts will be available for a fee from Ace Reporting (202-347-3700).

Commission conferences are accessible under section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations, please send an email to *accessibility@ferc.gov* or call toll free 1-866-208-3372 (voice) or 202-208-8659 (TTY), or send a fax to 202-208-2106 with the required accommodations.

For more information about this technical conference, please contact Emma Nicholson at *emma.nicholson@ferc.gov* or (202) 502-8741, or Alexander Smith at *alexander.smith@ferc.gov* or (202) 502-6601. For legal information, please contact Adam Eldean at *adam.eldean@ferc.gov* or (202) 502-8047. For information related to logistics, please contact Sarah McKinley at *sarah.mckinley@ferc.gov* or (202) 502-8368. This notice is issued and published in accordance with 18 CFR 2.1.

Dated: September 10, 2021.

Debbie-Anne A. Reese,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2021-20026 Filed 9-15-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
# L_2010159DE.01002501.xml

| 25.6.2010 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 159/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2010

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 159/25

---

Berichtigung des Beschlusses der Europäischen Zentralbank vom 14. Mai 2010 zur Einführung eines Programms für die Wertpapiermärkte (EZB/2010/5)

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 124 vom 20. Mai 2010
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 124 vom 20. Mai 2010

Seite 8, Erwägungsgrund 5:

anstatt:

„Als Bestandteil der einheitlichen Geldpolitik des Eurosystems sollte der endgültige Ankauf zugelassener börsengängiger Schuldtitel durch Zentralbanken des Eurosystems gemäß dem Programm im Einklang mit den Bestimmungen dieses Beschlusses umgesetzt werden —“

muss es heißen:

„Als Bestandteil der einheitlichen Geldpolitik des Eurosystems sollte der endgültige Ankauf zugelassener marktfähiger Schuldtitel durch Zentralbanken des Eurosystems gemäß dem Programm im Einklang mit den Bestimmungen dieses Beschlusses umgesetzt werden —“

Seite 8, Artikel 1:

anstatt:

„Gemäß den Bestimmungen dieses Beschlusses können die Zentralbanken des Eurosystems a) zulässige börsengängige Schuldtitel, die von Zentralstaaten oder öffentlichen Stellen der Mitgliedstaaten, deren Währung der Euro ist, begeben werden, auf dem Sekundärmarkt ankaufen, und b) zugelassene börsengängige Schuldtitel, die von privaten Rechtspersonen mit Sitz im Euro-Währungsgebiet begeben werden, auf den Primär- und Sekundärmärkten ankaufen.“

muss es heißen:

„Gemäß den Bestimmungen dieses Beschlusses können die Zentralbanken des Eurosystems a) zugelassene marktfähige Schuldtitel, die von Zentralstaaten oder öffentlichen Stellen der Mitgliedstaaten, deren Währung der Euro ist, begeben werden, auf dem Sekundärmarkt ankaufen, und b) zugelassene marktfähige Schuldtitel, die von privaten Rechtspersonen mit Sitz im Euro-Währungsgebiet begeben werden, auf den Primär- und Sekundärmärkten ankaufen.“

Seite 8, Artikel 2 erster Satz:

anstatt:

„Börsengängige Schuldtitel sind zum endgültigen Ankauf gemäß dem Programm zugelassen, sofern sie sämtliche folgenden Voraussetzungen erfüllen: ...“

muss es heißen:

„Marktfähige Schuldtitel sind zum endgültigen Ankauf gemäß dem Programm zugelassen, sofern sie sämtliche folgenden Voraussetzungen erfüllen: ...“

---
Aspinall Operations Meeting

January 18, 2018
OPERATIONS

PAST AND PRESENT



SNOW CONDITIONS




Jan SWE

To date

Avg Jan SWE

To Date

Avg Total 

Jan SWE

Butte 1.2” 1.8” 2.9”

Schofield 2.4” 3.8” 6.7”

Porphyry 1.4” 1.8” 3.4”

Slumgullion .7” 1.2” 2.4”

Park Cone .6” 1.3” 2.1”

Independence 1.3” 1.7” 3.0”

January Snowpack Conditions


Blue Mesa Inflow

1990 = 382,000 AF

2002 = 157,000 AF

2012 = 206,000 AF
RUNOFF FORECASTS

AND SPRING TARGETS

Year Type

Blue Mesa 

Forecasted 

Desired Peak at 

Whitewater

Duration of Half Bank 

(8,070 cfs)

Duration of Peak Flow 

(up to 14,350 cfs)

April-July Inflow

Af cfs Days Days

DRY < 381,000 900 0 0

MOD DRY 381,000 to 516,000 2,600 to 8,070 0 0

AVG DRY 516,001 to 709,000 8,070 10 0

AVG WET 709,001 to 831,000 8,070 to 14,350 20 2

MOD WET 831,001 to 1,123,000 14,350 40 10

WET >1,123,000 14,350 60 15

Spring Peak & Duration Targets

Based on Hydrologic Year Type

Mid-Jan

420,000

1750 cfs

Jan 15 Forecast

420 KAF Shoulder Flows

May 1 – July 25

300 cfs
Baseflow Targets