alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2021040EN.01002001.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 5.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 40/20 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10132 — Blackstone/B&J/Applegreen)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 40/09)

1.

On 29 January 2021, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2021040EN.01002001-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | The Blackstone Group Inc. (‘Blackstone’, United States), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | B&J Holdings Limited (‘B&J’, Malta), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Applegreen plc (‘Applegreen’, Ireland). |

Blackstone and B&J acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of Applegreen.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for Blackstone: a global asset management company, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for B&J: a holding company, owned by Joseph Barrett and Robert Etchingham and currently Applegreen’s largest shareholder, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for Applegreen: a roadside convenience retailer, operating from motorway service areas, trunk road service areas and petrol filling stations, with presence in Ireland, the United Kingdom and the United States. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2021040EN.01002001-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10132 — Blackstone/B&J/Applegreen

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2021040EN.01002001-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2021040EN.01002001-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
Listen

# Commission Business Meeting

In accordance with the Government in Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), the Commission on Civil Rights is holding a meeting to discuss the Commission’s business for the month of September.

Friday, September 22, 2023 - 10:00 AM

Notice and Agenda

Transcript (Unedited)

September 22, 2023

-  Event Calendar 
-  Public Briefings 
-  Commission Business Meetings 
-  Advisory Committees Meetings 
-  Archives
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Steakhouse Partners, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, A. Stone Douglass President, Chief Executive Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

This certification has not been, and shall not be deemed,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                     |  |  |  |                                                                               
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | 
|Dated: April 8, 2008 |  |  |  | /S/ A. Stone Douglass                                                         
|                     |  |  |  | A. Stone Douglass                                                             
|                     |  |  |  | President, Chief Executive Officer and Secretary (Principal executive officer)
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Tim Paterson-Brown, Chief Executive Officer of MGTCapital Investments, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to thebest of my knowledge:

 

(1)                             the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly periodended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2)                             the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|                   | By:    | /s/ TIM PATERSON-BROWN  |
|------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                   |   | Tim Paterson-Brown      |
|                   |   | Chief Executive Officer |
| November 12, 2009 |   |                    |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6453

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ANTHONY LEWIS GLENN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior

District Judge. (5:98-cr-00023-F-1; 5:00-cv-00852-F)

Submitted: September 11, 2008 Decided: September 16, 2008

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Lewis Glenn, Appellant Pro Se. Jane J. Jackson, Assistant

United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Lewis Glenn seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for

reconsideration of the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000)

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court

is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Glenn has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We deny Glenn’s motion for

relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer of

Sunterra Corporation

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(Adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



The undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Sunterra Corporation (Sunterra) hereby certifies that:



1. Sunterras Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December
31, 2003, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sunterra.



/s/    NICHOLAS J. BENSONNicholas J. Benson Chief Executive Officer


March 15, 2004
Listen

# IPv6 Policy

In accordance with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Memorandum 21-07 (M-21-07), dated November 19, 2020, by Fiscal Year (FY) 2023, all new US Commission on Civil Rights (USCCR) information systems must be IPv6-enabled at the time of deployment. It is also the strategic intent of US Commission on Civil Rights to phase out the use of IPv4 for all current systems as soon as practical by meeting the milestones laid out by M-21-07, to include at least 80% of IP-enabled assets on USCCR networks operating in IPv6-only environments by the end of FY 2025.

This statement designates the following team as the lead of USCCR’s IPv6 Integrated Project Team (IPT) to coordinate these actions. The IPT is responsible for developing and overseeing the overall IPv6 transition plan which shall be inclusive of strategies, acquisitions, processes, status, and milestones. Additionally, system owners shall ensure system documentation details plans for transitioning to IPv6 and that these plans align with the Agency’s overall IPv6 Implementation Plan.

### USCCR IPV6 Integrated Project Team

Deputy CIO, Technical LeadDirector of Management, Policy LeadChief of Administrative Services, Acquisition LeadChief of Budget and Finance, Finance Lead

In support of this mandate, designated key stakeholders identified within the IPT must:
                      - Provide strategies, processes, status, and milestones for inclusion in the Agency’s overall IPv6 implementation plan;
                      - Collaborate to identify opportunities for IPv6 pilots on operational systems and nominate them to the IPT;
                      - Oversee implementation of the Agency’s IPv6 implementation plan;
                      - Work to ensure that processes for approving new systems for operation, or upgrading existing systems, include a review of the system’s IPv6 readiness to ensure consistency with the Agency’s overall IPv6 Implementation Plan.

For questions, please contact CCR IPV6 Team at ipv6@usccr.gov.

References: OMB Memorandum M-21-07
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001018747
<NAME> WOODCREST GOLF CLUB, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          15,531
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,487,501
<ALLOWANCES>                                    39,730
<INVENTORY>                                     51,088
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          (24,126,286)
<PP&E>                                       3,950,135
<DEPRECIATION>                                 806,627
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 438,141
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          184,167
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     223,836
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   438,141
<SALES>                                        385,936
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,531,740
<CGS>                                          201,522
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,718,689
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                53,349
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,716
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (192,665)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (192,665)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (192,665)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Glen Canyon NRA 

• Update on -12-mile 

Slough Discussions

and Actions 

January 2024 
Reclamation’s Proposed Slough Alternative 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-12-mile Slough Modification Discussion – Summary 

• November, December, January – Discussions and early planning. 

• January 18, 2024 – On-site visit – logistics, equipment, designs, time frames 

• Currently addressing important questions and awaiting cost estimate(s). 

• Working toward a “go” or “no go” decision point by GLCA Superintendent. 

• If a “go,” NPS will work with Reclamation to assemble an interdisciplinary 

“federal family” working group and talk with tribes about the project. 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-12-mile Slough Modification Discussion – Pathways 

• No NPS fund pathway at this time. Two potential Reclamation fund pathways. 

• NEPA – Supplemental Info Report (SIR) vs Environmental Assessment (EA). 

• Wetlands assessment and pursuing 404 and 401 permits. 

• Talking with Solicitors for NPS and Reclamation about compliance approach. 

• Realistic timeframes – Earliest project action at slough may be Winter 2025. 

• Depending on water temps and netting, chemical treatment in July/Aug 2024. 
 

 

 

 

 

-12-Mile Slough Modification - Considerations 

• Natural feature influenced by over 50 years of dam operations. 

• Urgent threats by invasive fish to native species, some listed. 

• Other values – spring inflows, amphibians, invertebrates, waterfowl. 

• Other uses – hunting, bird census, water-based recreation. 

• Values to tribes – life, creation stories, plants, amphibians, more. 

• Trade-offs: Any decision will cause values or resources to be lost. 

• Efficacy: Can we succeed in our intended result? 

• Water temperature is key. What is our action package? 

• Identify and monitor other potential breeding sites along mainstem. 
Questions? Comments?
2012 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

11-5-2012

USA v. Abdul;Muhammud

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 10-3138

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2012

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2012 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"USA v. Abdul;Muhammud" (2012). 2012 Decisions. Paper 97.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2012/97
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

October 17, 2012

No. 10-3138

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

ABDUL KARIEM MUHAMMUD,

a/k/a Gerald Rogers

Abdul Kariem Muhammud,

Appellant

(E.D. Pa. No. 07-cr-00062)

Present: SCIRICA, ROTH and BARRY, Circuit Judges

Motion by Appellee to Publish Opinion entered September 28, 2012.

Respectfully,

Clerk/cjg

_________________________________ORDER________________________________

The foregoing motion is GRANTED. 

By the Court,

/s/Maryanne Trump Barry

Circuit Judge

Dated: November 5, 2012

CJG/cc: Mary E. Crawley, Esq.

 Annette Verdesco, Esq.
# C_2021040EN.01000101.xml

| 5.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 40/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 40/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10085 — Clearlake Capital Group/Siris Capital Group/Endurance/Web.com)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 40/01)

On 29 January 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10085. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10085. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
NRCS 794 - STRAWBERRYLatitude: 42.126Longitude: -120.836Elevation: None

NRCS 794 - Strawberry

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Quartz Mountain Site Page...



Quartz Mountain

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Strawberry Site Page...



Strawberry

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Gerber Reservoir Site Page...



Gerber Reservoir
Listen

# Refer a Complaint

## Introduction

There are many federal laws against discrimination. They were passed to protect people who, because of their race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, or disability, are denied their rights.

Discrimination might occur when an individual attempts to vote; rent or buy a home; use a public facility; obtain a job, an education, or a bank loan; or do many other things.

Discrimination is illegal when an individual is denied an opportunity or a service based on:
                      - race, which is generally understood to be membership in a racial group. Depending on which law is involved, membership in an ethnic group can also constitute race;
                      - color, which refers to a person’s actual skin shade, and may constitute a separate discrimination factor regardless of the person’s race;
                      - sex, which refers to gender;
                      - religion, which refers to a person’s religious beliefs and practices, or lack thereof, or a person’s membership in a religious group;
                      - national origin, which refers to an individual’s country of origin, the origin of an individual’s ancestors, or the physical, cultural, or linguistic characteristics of a particular nationality. This includes characteristics such as last name, accent, and cultural heritage;
                      - age, which refers to persons aged 40 or over; or
                      - disability, which refers to physical or mental impairments that substantially limit one or more major life activities of an individual.

## Complaint Referral Service

The United States Commission on Civil Rights does not act as an advocate for complainants or respondents in claims of discrimination, nor does it have enforcement powers. However, the Commission can assist you in the complaint process by helping to place you in contact with the appropriate office for obtaining information. In addition to providing information specific to your situation, the referred office will be able to further assist you in the event you decide to initiate a discrimination complaint.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

1-800-552-6843 or (202) 376-8513Hearing Impaired: 1-800-877-8339referrals@usccr.gov

You may also find the Commission publication(s) listed below helpful:

**Getting Uncle Sam to Enforce Your Civil Rights**This publication provides useful information on how, when, and where to file a complaint. It includes additional information for special circumstances where a person might lack citizenship, be a Native American, be a member of the military, or be institutionalized. It also lists contact information for federal agency regional, district, and local civil rights offices; selected private organizations; and state bar associations.

## Search Federal, State and Territory USA.gov Databases

Federal Agencies 

State and Territories

-  Contact Us 
-  Refer a Complaint
#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Storage                    
csv

      Inflow                    
csv

      Total Release                    
csv

      Pool Elevation                    
csv

      Spillway Release                    
csv

      Bypass Release                    
csv

      Release Volume                    
csv

      Inflow Volume                    
csv

      Evaporation                    
csv

      Area                    
csv

      Delta Storage                    
csv

#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Storage                    
json

      Inflow                    
json

      Total Release                    
json

      Pool Elevation                    
json

      Spillway Release                    
json

      Bypass Release                    
json

      Release Volume                    
json

      Inflow Volume                    
json

      Evaporation                    
json

      Area                    
json

      Delta Storage                    
json
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northwest Pipe Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brian W. Dunham, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/ BRIAN W. DUNHAM                  
|Brian W. Dunham                      
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|May 8, 2008