alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Lumisys
Incorporated Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 1997 and
Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended March 31, 1997
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such fincancial statments.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001001289
<NAME> LUMISYS INCORPORATED
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           19912
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     3681
<ALLOWANCES>                                       301
<INVENTORY>                                       2801
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 27856
<PP&E>                                            1095
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (778)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   28350
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              745
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                       25479
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     28350
<SALES>                                           5818
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  5818
<CGS>                                             2598
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2598
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  2179
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (250)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1291
<INCOME-TAX>                                       503
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                788
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       788
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATION*

I, Joseph L Wulkowicz, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report Form 10-K of Steakhouse Partners, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report; and

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's forth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting and;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Dated: August 16, 2004



                            /s/ Joseph L. Wulkowicz
                            ----------------------------
                            Joseph L. Wulkowicz
                            Chief Financial Officer and
                            Assistant Secretary
                            (Serving as principal financial and accounting
                            Officer)
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
The viaLink Company (formerly Applied Intelligence Group, Inc.) ("Company") on
Form S-8's (File No. 333-30073, 333-47547, 333-22227, and 333-47549) of our
report dated February 22, 1999, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements of the Company as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and for the years 
ended December 31, 1998, 1997, and 1996, which report is included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB.


PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
March 4, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                   1,000
       
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                 Jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                   Dec-31-1996
<CASH>                                 904
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                             0
<INVENTORY>                            158
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      1162
<PP&E>                               13729
<DEPRECIATION>                         205
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       16704
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 8693
<BONDS>                                  0
<COMMON>                              6792
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<OTHER-SE>                           (3234)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         16704
<SALES>                               1071
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      1081
<CGS>                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         2499
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     567
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (1933)
<INCOME-TAX>                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  (1933)
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                         (1933)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        (1.79)
<EPS-DILUTED>                        (1.79)
                            

</TABLE>
734 A.2d 1282

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant, v. Randy FISHER, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Submitted Aug. 9, 1999.

Decided Sept. 8, 1999.

Joseph P. Conti, Marshall J. Piccinini, Erie, for Com.

Andrea F. McKenna, Harrisburg, for Intervenor.

Patricia Kennedy, Joseph Burt, Erie, Stefan Presser, Philadelphia, Gary Neil Asteak, Easton, for Randy Fisher.

Karl Baker, Philadelphia, for Amicus Curiae.

Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN and SAYLOR, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Based upon our disposition in *Commonwealth v. Williams,*557 Pa. 285, 733 A.2d 593 (1999), we affirm the Order of the Erie County Court of Common Pleas dated November 7, 1997. Furthermore, we remand the matter to the common pleas court for disposition of any remaining issues.

Jurisdiction is relinquished.
#### CLARK, Respondent, v. MIDDLETOWN-GOSHEN TRACTION CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 12, 1897.)

Action by Harriet W. Clark against the Middletown-Goshen Traction Company.

No opinion. Motion granted. See 41 N. Y. Supp. 1109.
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 12

- 584 V

Filed: November 18, 2013

Not for P ublication

*************************************

A NTHONY LETTIERE

, *

*

Petitioner

, * Attorneys’ fees and costs decision b ased on

* s tipulation of f

act

v. *

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

*

*************************************

Isaiah R. Kalinowski

, Washington, DC , for petitioner

. Ann D. Martin

, Washington, DC, for respondent.

MILLMAN, Special Master

DECISION AWARDING ATTORNEYS ’ FEES AND COSTS 1

On November 18 , 2013 , the parties filed a stipulation of fact in which they agreed on an

appropriate amount for attorneys’ fees and costs in this case

.

I n accordance with t he General Order #9 r equirement, petitioner asserts that he did not

incur any costs in pu rsuit of his petition.

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation f or the special master’ s action in this

case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal

Claims’ s website, in accordance with the E

- Government Act of 2002, Pub . L. No. 107

- 347, 116 Stat. 2899,

2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made

available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is

privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly

unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and

move to redact such information prior to the document = s dis closure. If the special master, upon review,

agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall

redact such material from public access.2

Petitioner submitted his request for attorneys’ fees and costs to respondent. During

informal discussions, respondent ra ised objections t o certain items within petitioner ’ s application

. Based on these objections, petitioner amend s his application for attor ne ys’ fees and costs to

$7,500.00

. Respondent does not object to this amount. The undersigned finds this amount to be

reasonable. Accordingly, the court awards $ 7,500.00 , representing reimbursement for attorneys’

fees and costs. The award shall be in the form of a chec k payable jointly to petitioner and Maglio

, Christopher & Toale , located at 1605 Main Street, Suite 710, Sarasota, Florida 34236, in the

amount of $ 7,500.00

.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the

court is directed to enter judgment herewith. 2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 18, 2013 s/ Laura D. Millman

Laura D. Millman

Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party , either separately or

jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
# C_2021430EN.01000201.xml

| 25.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 430/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 430/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10338 – GALILEO / M6 / JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 430/02)

On 14 October 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10338. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10338. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Storage                    
csv

      Inflow                    
csv

      Total Release                    
csv

      Pool Elevation                    
csv

      Area                    
csv

      Release Volume                    
csv

      Inflow Volume                    
csv

      Delta Storage                    
csv

#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Storage                    
json

      Inflow                    
json

      Total Release                    
json

      Pool Elevation                    
json

      Area                    
json

      Release Volume                    
json

      Inflow Volume                    
json

      Delta Storage                    
json
#### Clark *v.*Sullivan.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, Fifth Department.*

June 20, 1890.)

Costs—On Appeal—Modification of Order.

Where on appeal the general term allows a certain amount for costs, the remedy of the prevailing party, who claims a greater amount, is by application to that court for a modification of its order, and not by appeal from the taxation of the clerk, in accordance with the order.

Appeal from special term, Monroe county.

Action by Charles W. Clark against Sarah E. Sullivan. From an order denying a motion for relaxation of costs defendant appeals. For former report, see 8 1ST. Y. Supp. 565.

Argued before Dwight, P. J„ and Macomber and Corlett, JJ.

*Henry Z. Sullivan,*for appellant. *Zachary P. Taylor,*for respondent.

Corlett, J.

The Monroe county judge made an order directing a commission to issue to take the testimony of a witness out of the state. As amended, it was entered September 7, 1889. The general term on appeal reversed the order, with $10 costs and disbursements. 8 *N.*Y. Supp. 565. The county clerk so taxed. The defendant appealed from the taxation of the clerk to the special term of this court, claiming that she was entitled to $20 before argument, and $40 for argument at the general term, instead of $10 costs and disbursements, as specified in the general term order. The special term denied the motion for retaxation. This appeal is from that order.

If the general term fell into an error in directing the amount of costs, it is obvious that the remedy of the defeated party would be an application to that court for a modification or revocation of the order. *Gould*v. *Root,*4 Hill, 554. It would lead to great mischief and confusion to attack the decisions of this court collaterally on appeal from another order. The well-established practice is the other way. Aside from this, the order was right on the merits. *Ranney*v. *Persser,*3 Law Bull. 10; *Phipps*v. *Carman,*26 Hun, 518. It was simply an appeal from an order, and section 3251, subd. 4, has no application. The motion was non-enumerated. Sections 767 and 779. The order should be affirmed. All concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

# AGENCY:

United States Commission on Civil Rights.

# ACTION:

Notice of commission public business meeting.

# DATES:

Friday, August 20, 2021, 12 p.m. EST.

# ADDRESSES:

Meeting to take place by telephone and is open to the public by telephone: 1-800-635-7637, Conference ID #: 8000136.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Angelia Rorison: 202-376-7700;                         *publicaffairs@usccr.gov*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

                    In accordance with the Government in Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), the Commission on Civil Rights is holding a meeting to discuss the Commission's business for the month of August. This meeting is open to the public. Computer assisted real-time transcription (CART) will be provided. The web link to access CART (in English) on Friday, August 20, 2021, is                     *https://www.streamtext.net/​player?​event=​USCCR.*                     Please note that CART is text-only translation that occurs in real time during the meeting and is not an exact transcript.                          ( print page 47291)    

## Meeting Agenda

I. Approval of Agenda

II. Business Meeting

A. Presentations from Advisory Committees to the Commission on Recent Reports/Memo Releases

B. Discussion and Vote on Iowa Advisory Committee Chair Appointment

C. Discussion and Vote on Advisory Committee Appointments

D. Discussion and Vote on the Release of The Civil Rights Implications of Cash Bail: Briefing Report Before the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights

E. Management and Operations
    - Staff Director's Report

III. Adjourn Meeting

Dated: August 19, 2021.

Angelia Rorison,

USCCR Media and Communications Director.

[FR Doc. 2021-18261 Filed 8-20-21; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Alan L. Hunte, President and Chief Financial Officer of LaSalle Re Holdings
Limited, hereby certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or
78o(d)) and that the information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of LaSalle Re Holdings Limited.

Date: May 15, 2003


/s/ Alan L. Hunte
-----------------
Alan L. Hunte
President and Chief Financial Officer
Order entered February 26, 2014

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 13

- 01518

- CV

AMARJIT SINGHA AND A LL OTHER OCCUPANTS

OF 315 ORIOLE COURT , MURPHY, TEXAS 7509 4, Appellant s

V.

FEDERAL NATIONAL MOR TGAGE ASSOCIATION, Appe llee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 002

- 02893

- 2012



### O RDER

We GRANT appellants’ February 20, 2014 unopposed motion for an extension of time to

file a reply brief. We ORDER the reply brief tendered this Court on February 20, 2014 filed as

of that date.

/s/ ADA BROWN

JUSTICE
#### Francisco Diaz, Plaintiff, and Merejildo Diaz, Respondent, v Luis Arocho, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

The trial court found that Merejildo Diaz loaned the sum of $22,000 to Luis Arocho, to be repaid in three months at an interest rate of 10% per annum. Although Mr. Arocho denied that such a loan was ever made, the factual questions were for the court, its findings are fully supported by the evidence, and we perceive no grounds upon which to disturb them. The remainder of the defendant’s contentions have been examined and found to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Fiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2010149EN.01002701.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 15.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 149/27 |

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 948/2009 of 30 September 2009 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff

(
[Official Journal of the European Union L 287 of 31 October 2009](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2009_287_R_TOC)
)

On page 6, Chapter 34:

for:

‘Soap; organic surface-active agents; washing preparations; lubricating preparations; artificial waxes; prepared waxes; polishing or scouring preparations; candles and similar articles, modelling pastes; ‘dental waxes’ and dental preparations with a basis of plaster’,

read:

‘Soap, organic surface-active agents, washing preparations, lubricating preparations, artificial waxes, prepared waxes, polishing or scouring preparations, candles and similar articles, modelling pastes, “dental waxes” and dental preparations with a basis of plaster’;

Section XII:

for:

‘Footwear; headgear; umbrellas, sun umbrellas, walking sticks, seat-sticks, whips, riding-crops and parts thereof; ...’,

read:

‘Footwear, headgear, umbrellas, sun umbrellas, walking sticks, seat-sticks, whips, riding-crops and parts thereof; ...’;

Chapter 66:

for:

‘..., riding crops ...’,

read:

‘..., riding-crops ...’;

On page 7, Chapter 77:

for:

‘(... the Harmonised system)’,

read:

‘(... the Harmonised System)’;

On page 171, the line after CN code 2204 29 82, column 3:

delete:

‘l’ ;

On page 313:

| | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | CN code 4412 99 40, column 3: | | | | | --- | --- | --- | | for | : | ‘10 (1)’, | | read | : | ‘10’; | |

| | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | CN code 4412 99 50, column 3: | | | | | --- | --- | --- | | for | : | ‘10 (1)’, | | read | : | ‘10’; | |

On page 809, column 1:

for:

‘
3003 90 10
’,

read:

‘
3003 90 00
’;

On page 809, column 1:

for:

‘
3003 90 90
’,

read:

‘
3003 90 00
’;

On page 811, column 1:

for:

‘
3907 20 21
’,

read:

‘
3907 20 20
’;

On page 811, column 1:

for:

‘
3907 99 19
’,

read:

‘
3907 99 90
’;

On page 812, column 1:

for:

‘
3912 39 80
’,

read:

‘
3912 39 85
’.

---