alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER I certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-KSB of The viaLink Company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;  2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periods covered
by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operation and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have:  (a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the Company is made known to us by
others, particularly during the periods in which this report is being
prepared;  (b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
report (the Evaluation Date); and  (c)
    
    presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;  5.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee
of our board of directors:  (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect our ability to record, process,
summarize, and report financial data and have identified for the
Companys auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  (b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
controls; and  6.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. Date: April 29, 2004By:
    /s/ BRIAN M. CARTERBrian M. CarterVice President and Chief Financial Officer
IIB 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2209 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2016 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 

Urban Affairs 

AN ACT 

To require the appropriate Federal banking agencies to treat 

certain municipal obligations as level 2A liquid assets, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2209 RFS

1 SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN MUNICIPAL OBLIGA2 TIONS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 18 of the Federal Deposit 

4 Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1828) is amended— 

5 (1) by moving subsection (z) so that it appears 

6 after subsection (y); and 

7 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(aa) TREATMENT OF CERTAIN MUNICIPAL OBLIGA9 TIONS.— 

10 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of the final 

11 rule titled ‘Liquidity Coverage Ratio: Liquidity Risk 

12 Measurement Standards; Final Rule’ (79 Fed. Reg. 

13 61439; published October 10, 2014) (the ‘Final 

14 Rule’) and any other regulation which incorporates 

15 a definition of the term ‘high-quality liquid asset’, 

16 the appropriate Federal banking agencies shall treat 

17 a municipal obligation that is both liquid and readily 

18 marketable (as defined in the Final Rule) and in19 vestment grade as of the calculation date as a high20 quality liquid asset that is a level 2A liquid asset. 

21 ‘‘(2) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this sub22 section: 

23 ‘‘(A) INVESTMENT GRADE.—With respect 

24 to an obligation, the term ‘investment grade’ 

25 has the meaning given that term under part 1 

26 of title 12, Code of Federal Regulations. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 2209 RFS

1 ‘‘(B) MUNICIPAL OBLIGATION.—The term 

2 ‘municipal obligation’ means an obligation of a 

3 State or any political subdivision thereof, or any 

4 agency or instrumentality of a State or any po5 litical subdivision thereof.’’. 

6 (b) AMENDMENT TO LIQUIDITY COVERAGE RATIO

7 REGULATIONS.—Not later than the end of the 3-month 

8 period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, 

9 the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Board of 

10 Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and the Comp11 troller of the Currency shall amend the final rule titled 

12 ‘‘Liquidity Coverage Ratio: Liquidity Risk Measurement 

13 Standards; Final Rule’’ (79 Fed. Reg. 61439; published 

14 October 10, 2014) to implement the amendments made 

15 by this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 1, 

2016. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Listen

## Official Views

The official views of the United States Commission on Civil Rights are primarily found in reports and publications, which include statements, letters, press releases, and other correspondence found on the Commission’s website or other public collections. Any statements, letters, press releases, or correspondence not listed on this website should not be considered as an official viewpoint of the Commission. Please contact publicaffairs@usccr.gov for questions or inquiries regarding the official nature of documents located on external websites or sources.

## Commission News

U.S. Commission on Civil Rights Releases Translated 2023 Statutory Enforcement Report, The Federal Response to Anti-Asian Racism in the United States
February 9, 2024

USCCR to Hold Public Briefing on Civil Rights Implications of the Federal Use of Facial Recognition Technology
February 1, 2024

VIEW MORE

## Advisory Committees News

Maine Advisory Committee Issues Addendum to Report: The Right to Criminal Legal Defense in Maine
April 4, 2024

Washington Advisory Committee Releases Report on Physical Barriers to Accessibility for Individuals with Disabilities
March 5, 2024

VIEW MORE

## Meetings

VIEW MORE

## Featured Report

### The Federal Response to Anti-Asian Racism in the United States

## Reports

Request for Congressional Appropriation for Fiscal Year 2025
Budget and PerformanceMarch 11, 2024

Physical Barriers to Accessibility for Individuals with Disabilities in Washington
Advisory Committees ReportsMarch 5, 2024

Mental Healthcare in the Texas Juvenile Justice System
Advisory Committees ReportsFebruary 21, 2024

The Status of Civil Rights in the U.S. Virgin Islands
Advisory Committees ReportsFebruary 21, 2024

The Insular Cases and the Doctrine of the Unincorporated Territory and its Effects on the Civil Rights of the Residents of Puerto Rico
Advisory Committees ReportsFebruary 12, 2024

FY 2024 No FEAR Act Report
No Fear ActFebruary 2, 2024

VIEW MORE
# United States Court of Appeals

f or the Fifth Circuit

No. 20

- 10251 Summary Calendar

United States of America,
Plaintiff

— Appellee ,

versus Jimmy Steele,
Defendant

— Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:08

- CR

- 87

- 1

Before Jolly, Elrod, and Graves, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam : * A jury found Jimmy Steele, federal prisoner # 36989

- 177, guilty of possession with the intent to distribute 500 grams or more of a substance containing cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B), possession of a firearm in furtherance of a dr ug trafficking offense in violation of 18

* Pursuant to 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 8, 2021 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-10251 Document: 00515929894 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/08/2021No. 20

- 10251

2 U.S.C. § 924(c), and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). He was sentenced as a career offender to a total of 360 months of imprisonment and eight years of supervised release. He appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for compassionate release or for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) and the denial of his motion for reconsideration

. We review a district court’s decision denying a motion for compassionate release and a motion for re consideration for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Chambliss , 948 F.3d 691, 693 (5th Cir. 2020) ; United States v. Rabhan , 540 F.3d 344, 346

- 47 (5th Cir. 2008)

. A district court abuses its discretion i f it bases its decision on an error of law or a clearly erroneous assessment of the evidence. United States v. Henderson , 636 F.3d 713, 717 (5th Cir. 2011).
While the district court discussed U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13 in its order, there is nothing in the recor d to indicate that it felt bound by this policy statement and its commentary. Instead, the record shows that the district court’s denial of relief was also based on its balancing of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors and that the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying the motion. See United States v. Shkambi , 993 F.3d 388, 393 (5th Cir. 2021); Chambliss , 948 F.3d at 693. Steele ’s arguments amount to a disagreement with the district court’s weighing of the § 3553(a) factors, which does not su ffice to show

error. See Chambliss , 948 F.3d at 694. Furthermore, Steele has not shown that the district court abused its discretion in denying his motion to reconsider

. See Rabhan , 540 F.3d at 346

- 47. Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED

. Case: 20-10251 Document: 00515929894 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/08/2021
USGS 11505900 - UPPER KLAMATH LAKE AT RATTLESNAKE POINT, ORLatitude: 42.348Longitude: -121.828Elevation: 35.56

USGS 11505900 - UPPER KLAMATH LAKE AT RATTLESNAKE POINT, OR

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Swan Lake Mtn Site Page...



Swan Lake Mtn

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Cold Springs Camp Site Page...



Cold Springs Camp
#### James Toth, Appellant, v Lisa Spellman, Respondent.

[945 NYS2d 557]

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward H. Lehner, J.), entered December 30, 2009, which, inter alia, granted so much of defendant’s motion for summary judgment as sought to dismiss the first three causes of action, and order, same court (Saliann Searpulla, J.), entered July 12, 2011, which, inter alia, granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the fourth cause of action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The documentary evidence supports defendant’s assertion that, contrary to expecting compensation for performing renovations to certain properties owned by defendant during the parties’ romantic relationship, plaintiff performed the renovations out of love and affection for defendant, and in an effort to make her happy *(see Morone v Morone,*50 NY2d 481 [1980]).

We have considered plaintiffs remaining arguments and find them without merit. Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Moskowitz, Acosta and Abdus-Salaam, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2009 NY Slip Op 33020(U).]
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2122 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2122

          For the relief of Enrique Soriano and Areli Soriano.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 29, 2015

   Mr. Gene Green of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          For the relief of Enrique Soriano and Areli Soriano.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR ENRIQUE SORIANO AND ARELI 
              SORIANO.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Enrique Soriano and Areli 
Soriano shall each be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for 
adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for 
permanent residence upon filing an application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of 
status to lawful permanent resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Enrique Soriano or Areli Soriano 
enters the United States before the filing deadline specified in 
subsection (c), he or she shall be considered to have entered and 
remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for 
adjustment of status under section 245 of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Enrique Soriano and Areli 
Soriano, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to 
reduce by 2, during the current or next following fiscal year, the 
total number of immigrant visas that are made available to natives of 
the country of the aliens' birth under section 203(a) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of 
immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the aliens' birth under section 202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Enrique 
Soriano and Areli Soriano shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be 
accorded any right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and 
Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

SEC RELEASE NO. 33-8124



I, Marc Hazout, Director, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of American Entertainment and Animation, Inc.;

(2) Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

(4) The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

(c) Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

(5) The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

(6) The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

|Dated: November 12, 2003 | /s/ Marc Hazout                                             
|------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------
|                         | Marc Hazout, Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
Listen

# Commission News

USCCR to Hold Public Briefing on The Federal Response to Anti-Asian Racism in the United States
March 16, 2023

Appointment of Commissioner Victoria Frances Nourse by President Joe Biden
March 16, 2023

Appointment of Commissioner Glenn D. Magpantay by Majority Leader Chuck Schumer
February 15, 2023

Appointment of Commissioner Mondaire Jones by Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi
January 19, 2023

U.S. Commission on Civil Rights Releases Report: Contemporary Civil Rights Challenges: A View from the State Advisory Committees
November 17, 2022

U. S. Commission on Civil Rights to Release Report: Contemporary Civil Rights Challenges: A View from the State Advisory Committees
November 7, 2022

The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights Announce the Appointments of Advisory Committee Members for Utah
October 26, 2022

U.S. Commission on Civil Rights Releases Report: Civil Rights and Protections During the Federal Response to Hurricanes Harvey and María
September 21, 2022

U. S. Commission on Civil Rights to Release Report: The Civil Rights and Protections During the Federal Response to Hurricanes Harvey and María
September 12, 2022

United States Commission on the Social Status of Black Men and Boys Hires Director
August 19, 2022

-    First  
-    Previous  
-  1 
-  2 
-  3 
-   ...  
-   Next  
-   Last  

-  All News 
-  Commission News 
-  Advisory Committees News 
-  Correspondence 
-  Videos 
-  Archives 

## Meetings

### Recent and Upcoming

Civil Rights Implications of the Federal Use of Facial Recognition Technology
March 8, 2024

Commission Business Meeting
February 23, 2024

Commission Business Meeting
January 19, 2024

VIEW ALL
Exhibit
14.(a).3
   
 CONSENT
 
 
 I hereby
consent to the inclusion of the summary of my appraisal of Blue Square's
investment property under the captions “Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies” (note 2f) and “Investment Property” (note 7) in the consolidated
financial statements of Blue Square-Israel Ltd. contained in the Annual Report
(31.12.2009) on Form 20-F of Blue Square-Israel Ltd., filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, and to the incorporation by reference of such summary
in the previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-149175) of
Blue Square-Israel Ltd.
 
 
 Tel
      Aviv, Israel
              /s/ Oded
      HaushnerJune
      21, 2010
              O.
      Haushner Civil Eng. andReal
      Estate Appraisal Ltd.
# C_2021293EN.01000601.xml

| 23.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 293/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 293/6

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10102 — VIG/AEGON CEE)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 293/04)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Vienna Insurance Group AG Wiener Versicherung Gruppe (‘VIG’; Austria), |
| --- | --- |

—

Vienna Insurance Group AG Wiener Versicherung Gruppe (‘VIG’; Austria),

| — | AEGON Hungary Holding B.V., AEGON Hungary Holding II B.V., AEGON Poland/Romania Holding B.V., and AEGON Turkey Holding B.V. (together ‘AEGON CEE’). |
| --- | --- |

—

AEGON Hungary Holding B.V., AEGON Hungary Holding II B.V., AEGON Poland/Romania Holding B.V., and AEGON Turkey Holding B.V. (together ‘AEGON CEE’).

VIG acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of AEGON CEE.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | VIG is the holding company of Vienna Insurance Group, an international insurance group headquartered in Vienna, Austria. It conducts its business through subsidiaries and branches in 30 countries. VIG mainly offers life and non-life insurance services, |
| --- | --- |

—

VIG is the holding company of Vienna Insurance Group, an international insurance group headquartered in Vienna, Austria. It conducts its business through subsidiaries and branches in 30 countries. VIG mainly offers life and non-life insurance services,

| — | AEGON CEE encompasses the Hungarian, Polish, Romanian and Turkish businesses of Aegon N.V. (the Netherlands). Aegon CEE is active in the fields of life and non-life insurance, pension fund business, asset management services and related ancillary services. |
| --- | --- |

—

AEGON CEE encompasses the Hungarian, Polish, Romanian and Turkish businesses of Aegon N.V. (the Netherlands). Aegon CEE is active in the fields of life and non-life insurance, pension fund business, asset management services and related ancillary services.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10102 — VIG/AEGON CEE

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---