alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-46874, 333-86785and 333-59582) of Liquid Audio, Inc. (currently known as LQ Corporation, Inc). of our report dated February 21, 2003, except for Note 16, to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2002, as to which the date is March18, 2003, relating to the financial statements, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP 

 

San Jose,California 

March 26, 2004
1

The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, Chief Judge, United States District Court

Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 09-1152

___________

Nicie Dillehay, also known as *

Nicie Anne Smith, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Eastern

* District of Arkansas.

Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner *

of Social Security, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: December 23, 2009

Filed: December 28, 2009

___________

Before BYE, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Nicie Dillehay appeals the district court’s1

 order affirming the denial of

disability insurance benefits for the period from July 1999 until mid-January 2004.

Having conducted de novo review of the relevant record and having carefully

considered Dillehay’s arguments for reversal, see Davidson v. Astrue, 578 F.3d 838,

841-42 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review), we agree with the district court that
-2-

substantial evidence supports the administrative law judge’s adverse decision.

Accordingly, we affirm, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and we grant appellee’s motion to strike

Dillehay’s appendix.

______________________________
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 11.1


                           ARBOR SOFTWARE CORPORATION
                STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
                                   (UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               THREE MONTHS ENDED         SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                  SEPTEMBER 30,             SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                1997         1996          1997        1996
                                             ---------    --------      ---------   -------
<S>                                           <C>         <C>            <C>        <C>    
    Net income..........................      $ 2,156     $ 1,417        $ 3,895    $ 2,611
                                              =======     =======        =======    =======

    Average shares outstanding..........       11,193      10,960         11,179     10,929

    Options.............................          852         755            729        780
                                              -------     -------        -------    -------

      Total common stock and common

        stock equivalents...............       12,045      11,715         11,908     11,709
                                              =======     =======        =======    =======

    Net income per share................      $  0.18     $  0.12        $  0.33    $  0.22
                                              =======     =======        =======    =======
</TABLE>


                                       24
# C_2021102EN.01000101.xml

| 24.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 102/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 102/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10156 — TIAA/AP1/AP2/GPIF/Target)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 102/01)

On 18 March 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10156. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10156. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 2 0 2 4

- 1835

_____________________________ C LAUDIA G RANT ,
Petitioner
,

v.

A NEURIN G RANT , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Certiorari

— Original Jurisdiction

.

August 23, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
D ISMISSED

.
L EWIS , B.L. T HOMAS , and W INOKUR , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Jerry L. Rumph
, Jr., and Olivia M. Brooks of Brooks Law, Tallahassee, for Petitioner

.2 No appearance for Respondent

.
COLORADO RIVER NEAR HOT SULPHUR SPRINGSLatitude: 40.083Longitude: -106.088Elevation: None

Colorado River Near Hot Sulphur Springs

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Never Summer Site Page...



Never Summer

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Fool Creek Site Page...



Fool Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to High Lonesome Site Page...



High Lonesome

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Sawtooth Site Page...



Sawtooth

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Arrow Site Page...



Arrow

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Bear Lake Site Page...



Bear Lake

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Berthoud Summit Site Page...



Berthoud Summit

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Lake Irene Site Page...



Lake Irene

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Phantom Valley Site Page...



Phantom Valley

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Stillwater Creek Site Page...



Stillwater Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Willow Creek Pass Site Page...



Willow Creek Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Jones Pass Site Page...



Jones Pass
ANIMAS RIVER NEAR CEDAR HILL, N. MEX.Latitude: 37.037Longitude: -107.875Elevation: 5960

ANIMAS RIVER NEAR CEDAR HILL, N. MEX.

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Beartown Site Page...



Beartown

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Cascade Site Page...



Cascade

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Cascade #2 Site Page...



Cascade #2

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Idarado Site Page...



Idarado

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Mineral Creek Site Page...



Mineral Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Molas Lake Site Page...



Molas Lake

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Red Mountain Pass Site Page...



Red Mountain Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Scotch Creek Site Page...



Scotch Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Spud Mountain Site Page...



Spud Mountain

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Stump Lakes Site Page...



Stump Lakes

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Columbus Basin Site Page...



Columbus Basin
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Toll-Free Phone Lines Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, October 12, 2021.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Rosalind Matherne at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-4115.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Toll-Free Phone Lines Project Committee will be held Tuesday, October 12, 2021 at 11:00 a.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be made with Rosalind Matherne. For more information please contact Rosalind Matherne at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-4115, or write TAP Office, 1111 Constitution Ave. NW, Room 1509, Washington, DC 20224 or contact us at the website: *http://www.improveirs.org.* The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: September 3, 2021.

Kevin Brown,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2021-19502 Filed 9-9-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
# C_2021136EN.01000301.xml

| 19.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 136/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 136/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10199 — Goldman Sachs/Advania)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 136/02)

On 6 April 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10199. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10199. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Allan Rowley,Chief Financial Officer of MGT Capital Investments Inc. (the “Company”),certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:
| (1)    |                                                                                                                                         | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for  the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 (the Report”) |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | fully complies with the requirements of   Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m or 78o(d)); and |
|   |                                                                                                                                         |                                                                                                               |
| (2)    |                                                                                                                                         | the information contained in the Report fairly  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    |
|   | results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                        |

 
|             |   | By:    |   | /s/ ALLAN ROWLEY        |
|-------------|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|        |   |   |   | Allan Rowley            |
|        |   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer |
| May 2, 2007 |   |   |   |                    |

 

1

----
Exhibit 14.(a).3





CONSENT





I hereby consent to the inclusion of the summary of my appraisal of Alon Holdings Blue Square's investment property under the captions “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” (note 2f) and “Investment Property” (note 7) in the consolidated financial statements of Alon Holdings Blue Square-Israel Ltd. contained in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Alon Holdings Blue Square-Israel Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2010, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.




Tel Aviv, Israel
/s/ Oded HaushnerJune 26, 2011
O. Haushner Civil Eng. andReal Estate Appraisal Ltd.
SCWC-15-0000655 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

STATE OF HAWAI # I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs. PHILLIP DEJUSUS DELEON, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-15-0000655; CR. NO. 09-1-1237) ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Reck tenwald, C.J., Nak ayama, Mc Kenna, Po llack, an d Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Phillip DeJesus DeLeon’s application for writ of certiorari filed on February 12, 2018, is hereby accepted, and will be scheduled for oral argument. The parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding scheduling.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, March 19, 2018. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-15-0000655 19-MAR-2018 11:48 AM
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

October 24, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00653

- CR

David TAFOLLA

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR8487

Honorable Kevin M. O ’ Connell , Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED pursuant to

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d). See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d), 37.1.

It is so ORDERED on October 24, 2018

.

_____________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 24th day of October, 2018

.

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court
#### BRENNAN, Respondent, v. O’HARE et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

December 22, 1896.)

Application by Mary Brennan, special guardian Brennan, administrator), against Annie O’Hare and others.

No opinion. Order reversed so far as it modifies the report of the referee, and so far as it grants an allowance to the respondent for proceedings on the accounting. The report of the referee is in all respects confirmed. As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs.
#### NASH v. SPANN.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 15, 1897.)

Pleading—Right to Bill op Particulars.

Plaintiff is entitled to a bill oí particulars to enable her to reply to a counterclaim of $10,000 ior medical services extending over a period oí three years, where she admits the rendition of some services.

Appeal from special term, New York county.

Action by Frances V. Nash against James H. Spann for money loaned. From an order denying a motion for a bill of particulars of defendant’s counterclaim, plaintiff appeals.

Reversed.

Argued before VAN BRUNT, P. J., and BARRETT, RUMSEY, O’BRIEN, and INGRAHAM, JJ.

A. B. Carrington, for appellant.

Abram I. Elkus, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This action was brought to recover $2,500, money loaned by plaintiff to defendant. The defendant admitted the causes of action set up in the complaint, and set up as a counterclaim, that he was a physician and surgeon, and that as such, between the 20th day of July, 1893, and 20th day of July, 1896, he rendered professional services to the plaintiff at her request, of the fair value of $10,300, of which no part had been paid except the sum of $745, leaving due to the defendant $9,555. The plaintiff made a motion for a bill of particulars, alleging ignorance of the particulars of the claim made by the defendant, and of the nature and extent of the services, and of the value claimed for them, and that it was necessary to her defense of the counterclaim,, and to enable her to reply herein, that she should have a bill of particulars. The motion was denied, and from the order thereupon entered this appeal is taken.

If the motion had been made to enable the plaintiff to prepare for trial, it undoubtedly was premature; but the plaintiff desired a bill of particulars to enable her to reply. .Where a complaint alleges the sale of goods, wares, and merchandise, and the rendition of services, in general terms, the party sued has always been allowed a bill of particulars, especially where the delivery of some goods or the rendition of some services is admitted. The party sued is entitled to know these particulars, so as to answer definitely and with precision, and not be required to hazard general allegations, which may or may not meet the special proof in the case. The nature and extent of services extending over a period of three years, for which a charge of over $10,000 is made, is a matter in respect to which the plaintiff had the right to have definite information, especially as it is admitted upon the record that, at the very time that the defendant is now claiming that an indebtedness existed upon the part of the plaintiff to him for professional services, he was borrowing money from her.

The order appealed from should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs to abide event.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 20

- 40062 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**Alejandro De La Torre,**

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:19

- CR

- 1639

- 1

Before **Jolly, Elrod,** and **Graves,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *
Alejandro De La Torre pleaded guilty to making false statements or representations with regard to firearms records. He requested a downward departure pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5K2.0(a)(3) , asserting primarily that although he illegally purchased firearms, he did so with the purpose of selling

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 23, 2020
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-40062 Document: 00515575721 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/23/2020No. 20

- 40062

2 them to law

- abiding citizens in Mexico who needed the weapons for personal protection. The district court sentenced him within the guidelines range to the statutory maximum sentence of 60 months in prison and three years of supervised release.
On appeal, De La Torre contend s that the district court erred in not departing downward under § 5K2.0(a)(3). He a cknowledge s that we have held that we lack jurisdiction to review the denial of a downward departure , but he argues that the basis for this jurisdictional limitation was eliminated by
the decision in United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220 (2005) , and related cases

.
Post

- Booker , we have held that we lack jurisdiction to review the denial of a downward dep arture unless the denial was based on the district court’s erroneous belief that it lacked the authority to depart. United States v. Lucas , 516 F.3d 316, 350

- 51 (5th Cir. 2008); United States v. Alaniz , 726 F.3d 586, 627 (5th Cir. 2013). De La Torres doe s not argue that the district court
denied his motion for a downward departure because the court mistakenly believed that it had no authority to depart. Therefore, we lack jurisdiction to
review the district court’s denial of the motion for a downward dep arture. See Lucas , 516 F.3d at 350

. The judgment of the district court is **AFFIRMED**

**.** Case: 20-40062 Document: 00515575721 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/23/2020
Exhibit 32.1

Informational Addendum to Report on Form 10-Q

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

Not Filed Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

The undersigned Chief Executive Officer of OYO Geospace Corporation does hereby certify as follows:

Solely for the purpose of meeting the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and solely to the extent this certification may
be applicable to this Report on Form 10-Q, the undersigned hereby certify that this Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in this
Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OYO Geospace Corporation.



/s/ Gary D. OwensName:

Gary D. OwensTitle:

Chief Executive OfficerFebruary 8, 2008