alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009117EN.01000101.xml

| 26.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 117/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 117/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5504 — Bridgepoint Capital Group/Hermes Private Equity Directs)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 117/01

On 11 May 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5504. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5504. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm).

---
RIO GRANDE AT ALAMOSALatitude: 37.481Longitude: -105.879Elevation: 7540

RIO GRANDE AT ALAMOSA

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Grayback Site Page...



Grayback

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Wager Gulch Site Page...



Wager Gulch

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Beartown Site Page...



Beartown

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Lily Pond Site Page...



Lily Pond

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Middle Creek Site Page...



Middle Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Upper Rio Grande Site Page...



Upper Rio Grande

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Upper San Juan Site Page...



Upper San Juan

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Wolf Creek Summit Site Page...



Wolf Creek Summit
IB 

Union Calendar No. 191 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1949 

[Report No. 114–252] 

To provide for the consideration and submission of site and design proposals 

for the National Liberty Memorial approved for establishment in the 

District of Columbia. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 22, 2015 

Mr. BUTTERFIELD (for himself and Mr. MCCLINTOCK) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2015 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1949 RH

A BILL 

To provide for the consideration and submission of site and 

design proposals for the National Liberty Memorial approved for establishment in the District of Columbia. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1949 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Liberty Me5 morial Clarification Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. COMPLIANCE WITH CERTAIN STANDARDS FOR COM7 MEMORATIVE WORKS IN ESTABLISHMENT OF 

8 NATIONAL LIBERTY MEMORIAL. 

9 Section 2860(c) of the Military Construction Author10 ization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 

11 112–239; 40 U.S.C. 8903 note) is amended by striking 

12 the period at the end and inserting the following: ‘‘, except 

13 that, under subsections (a)(2) and (b) of section 8905, the 

14 Secretary of Agriculture, rather than the Secretary of the 

15 Interior or the Administrator of General Services, shall be 

16 responsible for the consideration of site and design pro17 posals and the submission of such proposals on behalf of 

18 the sponsor to the Commission of Fine Arts and National 

19 Capital Planning Commission’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 191 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1949 

[Report No. 114–252] 

A BILL 

To provide for the consideration and submission of 

District of Columbia. erty Memorial approved for establishment in the site and design proposals for the National LibSEPTEMBER 8, 2015 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10.33

Amendment No. 8 (the "Amendment") To  Employment Agreement between  Univision Communications Inc. ("Univision") and George W. Blank  (the "Employment Agreement")

December 17, 2001

|To: |  | George W. Blank
c/o Univision
|--- |  | -----------------------------

Dear George:

You
and Univision agree to amend the Employment Agreement as follows:

1.Term. The Term of the Employment Agreement is extended through December 31, 2004, unless earlier terminated in
accordance with the provisions of the Employment Agreement.

2.Salary. Your annual Base Salary rate will be: Six Hundred Thousand Dollars ($600,000) for the annual period from
January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2004.

3.Effective Date of Amendment. Upon execution by you and Univision, this Amendment will become effective as of the date
first provided above.

4.Notices. Any notice to Univision's General Counsel shall be sent to the following address: Univision, 5999 Center Drive,
Los Angeles, California 90045.

5.Other. Except as provided in this Amendment, all other terms and conditions in the Employment Agreement will remain in
full force and effect, and the Employment Agreement, as amended hereby, is ratified and confirmed.

|                                  |  | UNIVISION COMMUNICATIONS INC.
|--------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|                                  |  | By:                          
|                                  |  |                              
|                                  |  |                              
|/s/GEORGE W. BLANKGeorge W. Blank |  |                              

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 10.36.1

Amendment No. 6 (the "Amendment") To  Employment Agreement between  Univision Communications Inc. ("Univision") and Andrew Hobson  (the "Employment Agreement")

November 14,
2001

|To: |  | Andrew Hobson
c/o Univision
|--- |  | ---------------------------

Dear
Andy:

You
and Univision agree to amend the Employment Agreement as follows:

1.Salary.    Your annual Base Salary rate will be: Five Hundred Forty Thousand Dollars
($540,000) for calendar year 2002.

2.Effective Date of Amendment.    Upon execution by you and Univision, this Amendment will
become effective as of the date first provided above.

3.Other.    Except as provided in this Amendment, all other terms and conditions in the
Employment Agreement will remain in full force and effect, and the Employment Agreement, as amended hereby, is ratified and confirmed.

|                               |  |  | UNIVISION COMMUNICATIONS INC.
|------------------------------ |  |  | -----------------------------
|                               |  |  |                              
|                               |  |  | By:                          
|                               |  |  |                              
|                               |  |  |                              
|/s/ ANDREW HOBSONAndrew Hobson |  |  |                              
|                               |  |  |                              
|                               |  |  |                              

---

QuickLinks
OFFICE OF T’HE A’lTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Honozwble Henry c. l$jLe 

county Attorney 

HWO county 

8ut nertt08, Texa.8 

Dmr Jar. Kylet 

*n 0pinlon or thir 

dewmment o n the l h aa b een reaeived 

from vhfah ve qu 

ra a&o the Tmteeea 

Sohool Dirtriot 

l uq teta ror io n 

rtudent in the 

qwitht IO 60 r0ii0w4t 

xe the rule or the Board or Trustees 0r the 

San litwaos Independent sohool Diatriot sunpending ioF the 

current sohool year a student vho PprrIea rsaaoxmble and valid? 

In your letter pu olts the8 spplicable Texnr 

statute8 and also a nwabar of mm@ deoided by the @ourt@ at 

this state mwtaining vartoua rular e~tdalirhad by rehool b0tird8 r0r ths g0vOnrannt or the rah00l and r0r th0 dit5Oiplitw 
Bon. mnry 0. KYle - p4P 2 

0r th6 student body. 

et al, 1?2 90. 

Th6 en06 0r w0Lm8 et al v. Tmatema, 

737, referred to in your 16tteP clearly holds 

that A rule aatebliahed br e&O31 authOritlea auuh E6 the 

tie in qwation ia WP4PaOmblS and lnvslld. The oplnSon 

la by ths suprem Court of #iaalealppi mad vNh It la perl ua a ive, It la, of course, not blndln,g in this state. 

Our courts hold th8t aohool autimrltlea 

have a brud 4iooretiort io promulgating nalm ror the goveaaHttit Or 5UhOOlO Md dlSC$pUJM Or 8tUdOBt5, aI%d it la g0~rsrallj,hold that t& ~lailw and upedleney of a rule eatablLa&d +y achaol bonrde ior tha oond\rot of the aahool la 

entirely wlthln the jumnt and dLacretlon of au& boarda 

and v1l.l rmt be cpatuvbod by the court8 unl6aa it clearly 

appear5 th8t th6 pule la rrbltrary and ttttrassonabl6. 

St vi11 be Obaermd th8t U&P Artlaln 2904, 

R. C. S., that th6 authority 0r th0 raboo~.bcmrd to suspend 

a l tudttnt rr0t5 the privilegse 0r the roheol fpr the aumea 

l ahoolycr la llaltedto lneorz4.giblh eonduct on the part 

‘ar the student. 

, 

xt i5 thought th0t th6 0plni0tt 0r the tt0tm 

In the aa*e 0raaeob, IIaplu,l8 eOundafid cthosa$d control 

our anaver to your qwation. TherOrom,. VQ thak that pw 

quartian ahourd be, and It Is, sarrsmd la the negative. 

r&r5 V6ry mtly 

ATTQRREY (3mIEluL GP rExA 

d4-r’ F-- 

BY * B. 2. Price 

Ra6s6tant 

EPP”BT 

AEPROBEDDEC 3, 1942
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 14, 2021 / Presidential Documents 50991 

Memorandum of September 7, 2021 

Delegation of Authorities Under Sections 552(c)(2) and 

506(a)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States of America, including section 301 of title 3, 

United States Code, I hereby delegate to the Secretary of State the authority 

under section 552(c)(2) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 to direct 

the drawdown of up to $25 million in commodities and services from 

the inventory and resources of any agency of the United States Government 

to provide immediate assistance to the Lebanese Armed Forces. I also hereby 

delegate to the Secretary of State the authority under section 506(a)(1) of 

the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 to direct the drawdown of up to $22 

million in defense articles and services from the Department of Defense 

to provide immediate assistance to the Lebanese Armed Forces. The Secretary 

of State is authorized to make the appropriate congressional notification 

and determination required under each section to direct such a drawdown. 

You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal 

Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, September 7, 2021 

[FR Doc. 2021–19932 

Filed 9–13–21; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P 


tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with PROC - O0BIDEN.EPS</GPH>
#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Storage                    
csv

      Evaporation                    
csv

      Inflow                    
csv

      Inflow Volume                    
csv

      Unregulated Inflow                    
csv

      Unregulated Inflow Volume                    
csv

      Power Release                    
csv

      Total Release                    
csv

      Release Volume                    
csv

      Pool Elevation                    
csv

      Power Release Volume                    
csv

      Spillway Release                    
csv

      Bypass Release                    
csv

      Bypass Release Volume                    
csv

      Area                    
csv

      Delta Storage                    
csv

#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Storage                    
json

      Evaporation                    
json

      Inflow                    
json

      Inflow Volume                    
json

      Unregulated Inflow                    
json

      Unregulated Inflow Volume                    
json

      Power Release                    
json

      Total Release                    
json

      Release Volume                    
json

      Pool Elevation                    
json

      Power Release Volume                    
json

      Spillway Release                    
json

      Bypass Release                    
json

      Bypass Release Volume                    
json

      Area                    
json

      Delta Storage                    
json
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Blount International, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Calvin E.Jenness, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i)            TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of thedates and for the periods expressed in the report.

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to BlountInternational, Inc. and will be retained by Blount International, Inc. and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| Date: August 8, 2007      |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
|                      |   |
|                      |   |
| /s/ Calvin E. Jenness     |   |   |
| Calvin E. Jenness         |   |
| Senior Vice President and |   |
| Chief Financial Officer   |   |
|                           |        |  |

 

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Johnny Bryant, Appellant.

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), rendered on October 31, 1984, unanimously affirmed, and motion by defendant to file a supplemental brief denied. No opinion. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Kassal, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.
#### Philip Engelder, Respondent, v Barbara C. Williams, as Administratrix of the Estate of Helen M. Chapin, Deceased, Appellant.

— Order unanimously affirmed with costs for reasons stated at Special Term, Sprague, J. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Alleghany County, Sprague, J. — execution.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
* The Honorable Ronald E. Longstaff, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 05-1596

___________ Valentino Maghee, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Southern v. * District of Iowa. * John F. Ault, Warden, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: November 3, 2005 Filed: November 9, 2005

___________ Before ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Valentino Maghee appeals the district court’s * order dismissing Maghee's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition challenging for the second time discipline imposed in January 2001 for rule violations he committed while at an Iowa work-release center. Following careful review, we reject Maghee's argument that he established cause for his procedural default for the reasons stated by the district court and by this court during Maghee’s earlier appeal, see Maghee v. Ault , 66 Fed. Appx. 81 (8th Cir. Apr.-2- 30, 2003) (unpublished per curiam); United States v. Bartsh , 69 F.3d 864, 866 (8th Cir. 1995) (law-of-case doctrine). Accordingly, we affirm the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHRISTOPHER A. MENDEZ,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 360 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 23rd day of January, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
#### Burroughs Corporation, Appellant, v Datacap, Inc., Respondent.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover payments due under an agreement with the defendant for the lease of computer equipment. The defendant interposed counterclaims for damages due to the plaintiff’s alleged breach of the lease and a prior maintenance agreement and for damages based on fraud and negligent misrepresentation in the inducement of the contract. Special Term denied the plaintiff’s motion and determined that there were issues of fact as to whether representations were made to the defendant’s president and as to whether these statements created a relationship of confidence between the parties.

The counterclaims to recover damages for fraud and negligent misrepresentation should be dismissed. The lease expressly disclaims any warranty as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose and any representation as to capacity, suitability for use or performance. Since the disclaimer specifically covers the subject of the alleged representations, the defendant’s claim of reliance is negated, and it is precluded from presenting evidence to show fraud in the inducement of the contract *(see, Danann Realty Corp. v Harris,*5 NY2d 317; *see also, Citibank v Plapinger,*66 NY2d 90, *rearg denied*67 NY2d 647). Similarly, the disclaimer would defeat the defendant’s claim to recover damages for negligent representation, even if the defendant had met its burden of presenting sufficient facts to show that a special relationship existed between the parties *(see, Dorsey Prods. Corp. v United*
      *623
      *States Rubber Co.,*21 AD2d 866, *affd*16 NY2d 925, *rearg denied*16 NY2d 1082). In any case, the defendant failed to allege facts sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact on its claims to recover damages for fraud and negligent misrepresentation but instead offered only the vague allegations that the plaintiff’s marketing representatives had made false statements as to the quality of its product *(see, Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557).

The denial of partial summary judgment dismissing that portion of the defendant’s first counterclaim involving an alleged breach of the maintenance agreement was proper as triable issues of fact exist with respect to it. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                          OF US GLOBAL NANOSPACE, INC.
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section.1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) each of the
undersigned officers of US Global Nanospace, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby
certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

(a) The quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2005
of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(b) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b) Information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                             Dated:  February 21, 2006


                             /s/ Carl Gruenler
                             -----------------------
                             Carl Gruenler,
                             Chief Executive Officer


                             /s/ Kevin Cronin
                             -----------------------
                             Kevin Cronin,
                             Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 23.2

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-18981, 333-18983, 333-18985, 333-18987, 333-18989, 333-29153, 333-63493,
333-36646, 333-46126 and 333-67710 all on Form S-8 of SRS Labs, Inc., of our report dated March 15, 2002, appearing in SRS Labs, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10K for the year
ended December 31, 2002.

Deloitte &
Touche LLP

/s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Costa
Mesa, California
March 31, 2003

---

QuickLinks
#### In the Matter of Martin White, Appellant, v James J. Walsh, as Superintendent of Sullivan Correctional Facility, Respondent.

Submitted January 16, 2007;

decided March 22, 2007

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed as untimely *(see*CPLR 5513 [b]). Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
# C_2021031EN.01000301.xml

| 28.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10091 — TowerBrook Capital Partners/Warburg Pincus/AA)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 31/03)

On 22 January 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10091. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10091. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---