alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

---

Exhibit 13.(a).1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Blue Square-Israel Ltd. (the Company) on
Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby
certify that to the best of our knowledge:

1.    
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: June 28, 2006 |  | By: /s/ Gil Unger
Gil UngerChief Executive Officer
|------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------

|Date: June 28, 2006 |  | By: /s/ Emanuel Avner
Emanuel AvnerChief Financial Officer
|------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2058 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2058

  To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to provide for a 
certain effective date with respect to deemed tobacco products, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 28, 2015

   Mr. Cole introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to provide for a 
certain effective date with respect to deemed tobacco products, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``FDA Deeming Authority Clarification 
Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. DATE FOR APPLICATION OF FEDERAL FOOD, DRUG, AND COSMETIC ACT TO 
              DEEMED TOBACCO PRODUCTS.

    Section 901(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 
U.S.C. 387a(b)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``This chapter shall apply'' and inserting 
        the following:
            ``(1) In general.--This chapter shall apply''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(2) Deemed tobacco products.--For each tobacco product 
        deemed subject to the requirements of the Act pursuant to 
        paragraph (1), each reference in sections 905(j) and 910(a)--
                    ``(A) to `February 15, 2007', shall be considered 
                to be a reference to `the effective date of the 
                regulation under which a tobacco product is deemed 
                subject to the requirements of this Act pursuant to 
                section 901(b)(1)'; and
                    ``(B) to `21 months after the date of enactment of 
                the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act', 
                shall be considered to be a reference to `21 months 
                after such effective date'.''.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered May 15, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01046-CV

JIMMY CHARLES JOHNSON, Appellant

V.

DALLAS COUNTY ET AL, Appellee

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. TX-10-31998-C

ORDER

Appellant’s “Amended Motion to Order Sealing of Documents in Tex.R.Civ.P. 76(a)” is 

DENIED.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES 

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>  5 
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED APRIL 30, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          23,320
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  255,719
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         134,181
<DEPRECIATION>                                 102,756
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,269,474
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,415
<OTHER-SE>                                   (170,746)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,269,474
<SALES>                                        406,577
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               406,577
<CGS>                                          376,338
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  864,924
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,758
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (471,105)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (471,105)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (471,105)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)
        

</TABLE>
## NO. 12

- 1 4

- 00 1 35

- C R

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN RE: §
KEVIN REVELS, § ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

RELATOR §

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM Relator Kevin Revels was convicted of aggravated assault on a correctional officer with a deadly weapon. This court affirmed his conviction. See generally Revels v. State , No.
12

- 93

- 00325

- CR (Tex. App.

– Tyler June 29, 1995, pet. ref’d) (not designated for publication). In this proceeding, he seeks an order remanding cause number 12

- 93

- 00325

- CR with instructions that the trial court dismiss the case and discharge him from prison. We construe Relator’s “Petition Requesting Court to Dismiss Case” as a postc onviction petition for writ of habeas

corpus. A writ of habeas corpus is the exclusive means to challenge a final felony conviction.
T EX

. C ODE C RIM

. P ROC

. A NN

. art. 11.07 § 3 (West Supp. 2013); Bd. of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Eighth Dist. Cou rt of Appeals , 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). But only the court of criminal appeals has jurisdiction to grant postconviction habeas relief from a
final felony conviction. See Keene , 910 S.W.2d at 483. Accordingly, we dismiss Relator’s post conviction petition for writ of habeas corpus for want of jurisdiction. Opinion delivered May 30 , 2014. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

( DO NOT PUBLISH)

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

MAY 30 , 2014

NO. 12

- 1 4

- 00 135

- CR

KEVIN REVELS , Relator V. HON.PAM FLETCHER, Respondent

O RIGINAL P ROCEEDING

ON THIS DAY came to be heard the postconviction petition for writ of habeas corpus filed by KEVIN REVELS , who is the defendant in Cause No. 14,115

- CR pending on the docket of the 349 th Judicial District Court of Houston County, Texas. Said postconviction petition for habeas corpus having been filed herein on May 29 , 201 4 , and the same having been duly considered, it is the opinion of th e Court that this Court is without jurisdiction of this original proceeding , it is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and
ORDE RED that the said postconviction petition for writ of habeas corpus be, and the same is, hereby D ISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

.

By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.
<PAGE>


                                                                 Exhibit 99.1

                              CERTIFICATION OF THE
                           CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF
                       ATLANTIC TECHNOLOGY VENTURES, INC.

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlantic Technology Ventures, Inc.
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Frederic P. Zotos, Chief Executive Officer of Atlantic, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sectiion 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         Atlantic.


                                          /s/ FREDERIC P. ZOTOS
                                          ----------------------------------
                                          Frederic P. Zotos
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
                                          November 7, 2002
* The Honorable Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior United States District Judge for the Northern District of West Virginia, sitting by designation. RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 09a0252p.06 

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

_________________ J OHNELLA R ICHMOND M OSES , Personal Representative of the Estate of M ARIE M OSES I RONS , Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. P ROVIDENCE H OSPITAL AND M EDICAL C ENTERS , I NC . and P AUL L ESSEM , Defendants-Appellees, C HRISTOPHER WALTER H OWARD , Third-Party Defendant. X - - - -> , - - - - - - - - - N No. 07-2111

Filed: July 17, 2009 Before: CLAY and GIBBONS, Circuit Judges; STAMP, District Judge. *

_________________ ORDER

_________________ The court having received a petition for rehearing en banc, and the petition having been circulated not only to the originalpanel members but also to all other active judges of this court, and less than a majority of the judges having favored the suggestion, the petition for rehearing has been referred to the original panel. The panel has further reviewed the petiti on for rehearing and concludes that the issues raised in the petition were fully considered upon the original submission and decision of the case. Accordingly, the petition is denied.

1No. 07-2111 Moses v. Providence Hospital and Medical Ctrs., et al. Page 2 GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I resp ectfully dissent from the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc. By remaining loyal to the errant obiter dictum contained in Thornton v. Southwest Detroit Hosp ., 895 F.2d 1131 (6th Cir. 1990), the majority has perpetuated a serious conflict between our circuit and the Ninth Circuit, Bryant v. Adventist Health Sys ., 289 F.3d 1162 (9th Cir. 2002), the Fourth Circuit, Bryan v. Rectors and Visitors of the Univ. of Va. , 95 F.3d 349 (4th Cir. 1996), the federal regulations, 42 C.F.R. § 489.24(d)(2)(i), and the vast majority of lower court decisions. See generally Preston v. Meriter Hosp., Inc. , 747 N.W.2d 173 (Wis. Ct. App. 2008), petition for review denied, 749 N.W.2d 662 (Wis. 2008), and cases cited therein. At issue is the construction of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (“EMTALA”), 42 U.S.C. § 1395 dd. C ontrary to the federal regulations and the weight of authority, a panel of this court in Mosesheld that federal law imposes a duty on hospitals that accept Medicare funding to adequately stabilize a patient after the hospital has satisfied its emergency room obligations by either transferring the individual or admitting him for in-patient care. Our panel decision misconstrues EMTALA, making it a general federal medical malpracti ce statute, rather than an act limited to emergency room screening and stabilization. Bryan , 95 F.3d at 351. For these reasons, I would grant rehearing en banc and therefore respectfully dissent. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT /s/ Leonard Green

_________ ________ __________________ Clerk
June 12, 1998

Mr. Donald R. Head
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
CAPITAL TITLE GROUP, INC.
14555 North Scottsdale Road, Suite 320
Scottsdale, Arizona 85254

RE:  Amendment to Acquisition  Consulting Agreement between Capital Title Group,
     Inc. and Miller Capital Corporation Dated January 28, 1998


Dear Don:

Per our recent  discussions,  Miller Capital  Corporation  ("MCC") has agreed to
amend  our  Acquisition  Consulting  Agreement  (the  "Agreement")  specifically
Section  II,  Compensation,  relating to fees to be paid to MCC in the event the
Company  effectuates  a  corporate  restructuring,   merger,  joint  venture  or
acquisition during the term of the Agreement in accordance with the fee schedule
as detailed in Section II.

The Agreement is hereby  amended to state that MCC will not be entitled to a fee
for  transactions,  as  contemplated  under  the  Agreement,  that are  arranged
directly by the Company and where each transaction is in an amount of $5,000,000
or less. In the event the Company  requests  MCC's services on  transactions  of
$5,000,000 or less,  then MCC and the Company will  negotiate an acceptable  fee
for services in advance of MCC's acceptance of such assignment.

Further, MCC and Capital Title Group are presently  negotiating on the potential
acquisition  of  Northwestern  Title  Company,  which if completed MCC agrees to
accept a reduced  minimum fee for the transaction in the amount of $125,000 as a
cash  payment and $25,000 in value of the  Company's  common  stock (the "Common
Stock"). The Company reserves the right to bonus MCC for additional compensation
at the close of the transaction.  The Common Stock will be priced at the average
Bid price for 30 days  prior to the  closing  date of the  transaction  and will
include registration and piggyback rights.
<PAGE>
Mr. Donald R. Head
Capital Title Group, Inc.
Amendment to Acquisition Consulting Agreement between
Capital Title Group, Inc. and Miller Capital Corporation Dated January 28, 1998
June 12, 1998


SIGNATURE PAGE ONLY


AGREED AND ACCEPTED:

         Please  confirm  that the  foregoing  correctly  sets  forth our mutual
understanding  by signing and returning the copy of this Agreement  provided for
that purpose.


Capital Title Agency Inc.                    Miller Capital Corporation
Donald R. Head                               Rudy R. Miller

By:                                          By:
    ------------------------------------         -------------------------------
Title:     Chairman and CEO                  Title:    Chairman and CEO

Date:                                        Date:
     -----------------------------------           -----------------------------
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C.  SECTION 1350**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Purchase Point Media Corp. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steve
      Rubakh, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report
      fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
      operations of the Company.






/s/
      Steve Rubakh


Steve
      Rubakh


Chief Financial
      Officer




Dated:
        November 21,
        2007
**Exhibit
      ___**


**CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **THE
        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 **CHIEF
        FINANCIAL OFFICER**
 
 
 I,
        Vincent De Lorenzo, certify that:
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report of Digital Creative Development Corporation
        (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 (the
        "Report"), the undersigned officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to
        18
        U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
        Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
  Date:
        October 2, 2007
 
 
 /
        s /
        Vincent De Lorenzo
 Vincent
        De Lorenzo
 Chief
        Financial Officer
#### Marie Petrone, Respondent, v Salvatore J. Sclafani et al., Appellants.

In a medical malpractice action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pizzuto, J.), dated June 24, 1986, which denied their motion for summary judgment based upon the plaintiffs failure to timely comply with a prior conditional order of preclusion of the same court (I. Aronin, J.), dated November 1,1985.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The plaintiff delayed in complying with the conditional order of preclusion requiring her to serve a verified bill of particulars within 60 days of service of the conditional order of preclusion upon her until some four months beyond the time period prescribed, and only after the defendants moved, on the basis of the plaintiffs default, for summary judgment. In opposing the summary judgment motion, the plaintiff failed to serve an affidavit of merit from a physician competent to attest to the meritorious nature of her claim. Accordingly, there being no extraordinary circumstances present in this case warranting relief from her default, it was an abuse of discretion, as a matter of law, for the court to deny the defendants’ motion to dismiss the action *(see, Fiore v Galang,*64 NY2d 999, *affg*105 AD2d 970; *La Buda v Brookhaven Mem. Hosp. Med. Center,*62 NY2d 1014, *affg*98 AD2d 711; *Amodeo v Radler,*59 NY2d 1001, *affg*89 AD2d 594; *see also, Smith v Lefrak Org.,*60 NY2d 828, *affg*96 AD2d 859). Niehoff, J. P., Eiber, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.
FOUNTAIN VALLEY CONDUIT RELEASE FROM PUEBLO RESERVOIRLatitude: 38.268Longitude: -104.724Elevation: None

Fountain Valley Conduit release from Pueblo Reservoir

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Glen Cove Site Page...



Glen Cove

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Saint Elmo Site Page...



Saint Elmo

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Hayden Pass Site Page...



Hayden Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Brumley Site Page...



Brumley

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Fremont Pass Site Page...



Fremont Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Independence Pass Site Page...



Independence Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Ivanhoe Site Page...



Ivanhoe

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Porphyry Creek Site Page...



Porphyry Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to South Colony Site Page...



South Colony

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Medano Pass Site Page...



Medano Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Buckskin Joe Site Page...



Buckskin Joe

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Rough And Tumble Site Page...



Rough And Tumble
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of Purchase Point Media Corporation (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ended  September 30, 2004 filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  I, Albert  Folsom,
President and Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects,  the consolidated  financial  condition of the Company as of the dates
presented and  consolidated  result of operations of the Company for the periods
presented.


Dated: November 12, 2004


                                   BY:  /s/ Albert Folsom
                                        -------------------------------------
                                        Albert Folsom, President and Chief
                                        Financial Officer
#### Robert Stevenson et al., Appellants, v Joseph Olfano et al., Respondents.

In an automobile negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jordan, J.), entered November 10, 1986, which is in favor of the defendants, upon a jury verdict on the issue of liability, and which denies the plaintiffs’ motion to set aside the verdict.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

It is undisputed that the vehicle which the defendant Olfano was operating came into contact with the rear of the vehicle operated by the plaintiff Robert Stevenson. In view of the disputed issues of fact concerning the circumstances immediately preceding the accident and the fact that the defendants came forward with an exculpatory explanation, the factual evaluation of the evidence was properly put before the jury *(see, Pfaffenbach v White Plains Express Corp.,*17 NY2d 132).

As a review of the record indicates that the jury’s verdict was based on a fair interpretation of the evidence and a valid line of reasoning which could lead rational people to a similar conclusion, it cannot be said that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence *(see, Coyle v Egalite,*121 AD2d 676).

We have reviewed the plaintiffs’ remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Harwood, JJ., concur.
EAST CANYON CREEK NEAR MORGAN, UTLatitude: 40.922Longitude: -111.607Elevation: 5480

EAST CANYON CREEK NEAR MORGAN, UT

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Farmington Lower Site Page...



Farmington Lower

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Morgan Site Page...



Morgan

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Brighton Site Page...



Brighton

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Farmington Site Page...



Farmington

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Lookout Peak Site Page...



Lookout Peak

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Mill-D North Site Page...



Mill-D North

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Parleys Summit Site Page...



Parleys Summit

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Thaynes Canyon Site Page...



Thaynes Canyon

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Parleys Upper Site Page...



Parleys Upper

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Hardscrabble Site Page...



Hardscrabble

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Parrish Creek Site Page...



Parrish Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Louis Meadow Site Page...



Louis Meadow