alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-1872

In re: ABDU-SALIM GOULD,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:20-hc-02074-D)

Submitted: December 22, 2020 Decided: December 28, 2020

Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Abdu-Salim Gould, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Abdu-Salim Gould petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing his 

immediate release or an order directing the district court to grant his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 

petition. He also seeks credit for time served. We conclude that Gould is not entitled to 

mandamus relief.

Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary 

circumstances. Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 542 U.S. 367, 380 (2004); In re Murphy-Brown, 

LLC, 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018). Further, mandamus relief is available only when 

the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. Murphy-Brown, 907 F.3d at 795. 

The relief sought by Gould is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, we 

deny Gould’s petition for writ of mandamus and his supplemental petition. Additionally, 

although we grant Gould’s motion for leave to file a motion for injunctive relief, we deny 

his motion for a stay of his § 2254 proceeding, and deny his motions for an order to show 

cause, for a preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order, or for disciplinary 

proceedings directed to prison officials and to the judges and court personnel of the Eastern 

District of Virginia. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
UTE DIVERSION (TOWAOC CANAL)Latitude: 37.224Longitude: -108.697Elevation: 5802

UTE DIVERSION (TOWAOC CANAL)
Academy Concert: "Voices Join Forces"

Email this event to me @

Invalid Email Address!Invalid Email Address!

Start Date/Time:

Sunday, April 21, 2024 2:00 PM(UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)

Recurring Event:

One time event

Importance:

Normal Priority

Category:

Concert Band

Location:

U.S. Coast Guard Academy, Leamy Concert Hall

Description:

**Academy Concert: "Voices Join Forces"**

**2:00PMApril 21, 2024**Leamy Concert HallU.S. Coast Guard Academy15 Mohegan Ave.New London CT, 06320

Come enjoy a theatrical performance featuring your favorite vocal works from opera, Broadway, andthe movies under the baton of Commander Adam Williamson. We welcome tenor, vocalist Musician1st Class Ryan Connelly from the United States Navy Band, who will share the spotlight with theCoast Guard Band’s soprano, Musician 1st Class Allison Landstedt in this celebration of vocal music. 

The program starts with a salute to opera, featuring the Overture to *Marriage of Figaro* and classicarias by Mozart and Puccini. Bernstein’s extraordinary “Overture to *Candide*” is next, followed by amedley of duets from the musical *Jekyll & Hyde*. Alto saxophonist Chief Musician Greg Case is thefeatured soloist in selections from the modern work *Solace: A Lyric Concerto*, and the performancecomes to a fantastical conclusion with a fairy tale medley of Disney favorites. 

 

Enrolled Users:

Adam Crowe

                - Return
                - 
                - Export
Listen

# Data Inventory Program

## **Featured Data**

No Fear Statistics

### **Civil Rights Complaints**

Data Prepared by the Office of Civil Rights Evaluation

## Foundations for Evidence-Based Policymaking Act of 2018

This bill requires agencies to submit annually to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and Congress a systematic plan for identifying and addressing policy questions. Additionally, each agency shall develop and maintain a comprehensive data inventory and designate a Chief Data Officer.

**Chief Data Officer**Michele Rameychiefdataofficer@usccr.gov

-  All Reports 
-  Annual Statutory Enforcement 
-  Briefing Reports 
-  Advisory Committees Reports 
-  Budget and Performance 
-  FOIA Reports 
-  Data Inventory Program 
-  Civil Rights Complaints 
-  Historical Publications 
-  Archives
DUCHESNE RIVER AT MYTON, UTLatitude: 40.2Longitude: -110.064Elevation: 5071

DUCHESNE RIVER AT MYTON, UT

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Lakefork #3 Site Page...



Lakefork #3

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Wolf Creek Peak Site Page...



Wolf Creek Peak

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Mountain Home Site Page...



Mountain Home

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Little Red Fox Site Page...



Little Red Fox

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Brown Duck Site Page...



Brown Duck

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Currant Creek Site Page...



Currant Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Daniels-Strawberry Site Page...



Daniels-Strawberry

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Five Points Lake Site Page...



Five Points Lake

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Lakefork Basin Site Page...



Lakefork Basin

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Wilbur Bench Site Page...



Wilbur Bench

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Lakefork #1 Site Page...



Lakefork #1

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Rock Creek Site Page...



Rock Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Strawberry Divide Site Page...



Strawberry Divide

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Trial Lake Site Page...



Trial Lake

Courtesy NRCS - Go to White River #1 Site Page...



White River #1
#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Storage                    
csv

      Evaporation                    
csv

      Inflow                    
csv

      Total Release                    
csv

      Pool Elevation                    
csv

      Inflow Volume                    
csv

      Release Volume                    
csv

      Delta Storage                    
csv

      Area                    
csv

#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Storage                    
json

      Evaporation                    
json

      Inflow                    
json

      Total Release                    
json

      Pool Elevation                    
json

      Inflow Volume                    
json

      Release Volume                    
json

      Delta Storage                    
json

      Area                    
json
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-39-2021]

On May 13, 2021, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, LLC (Wyeth) submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility within Subzone 27R, in Andover, Massachusetts.

The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the **Federal Register** inviting public comment (86 FR 27067, May 19, 2021). On September 10, 2021, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including Section 400.14.

Dated: September 10, 2021.

Elizabeth Whiteman,

Acting Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2021-19915 Filed 9-14-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2168 

AN ACT 

To make the current Dungeness crab fishery management 

regime permanent and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2168 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘West Coast Dungeness 

3 Crab Management Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DUNGENESS CRAB FISHERY MANAGEMENT. 

5 Section 203 of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to approve 

6 a governing international fishery agreement between the 

7 United States and the Republic of Poland, and for other 

8 purposes’’, approved November 13, 1998 (Public Law 

9 105–384; 16 U.S.C. 1856 note) is amended— 

10 (1) by striking subsection (i); and 

11 (2) by redesignating subsection (j) as sub12 section (i). 

Passed the House of Representatives October 6, 

2015. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2168 

AN ACT 

To make the current Dungeness crab fishery manposes. agement regime permanent and for other pur-
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Altair Nanotechnologies Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Alan Gotcher, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
      Alan Gotcher


Alan
      Gotcher


Chief
      Executive Officer


March
      16,
      2006
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of NMT Medical, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
the undersigned, John E. Ahern, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                     |  |                                                    
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 12, 2007 |  | /s/    JOHN E.
AHERN                               
|                     |  | John E. Ahern President and Chief Executive Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jeremy Hasley, Appellant.

[945 NYS2d 587]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John L. Michalski, A.J.), rendered December 1, 2010. The judgment revoked defendant’s sentence of probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed. Present — Scudder, P.J., Centra, Peradotto, Carni and Lindley, JJ.
# C_2021016EN.01001701.xml

| 15.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/17

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10084 — ACP/Marubeni/Toho Gas/GGND)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 16/06)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Allianz Capital Partners GmbH (‘ACP’, Germany), belonging to the Allianz Group, |
| --- | --- |

—

Allianz Capital Partners GmbH (‘ACP’, Germany), belonging to the Allianz Group,

| — | Marubeni Corporation (‘Marubeni’, Japan), |
| --- | --- |

—

Marubeni Corporation (‘Marubeni’, Japan),

| — | Toho Gas Co. Ltd. (‘Toho Gas’, Japan), |
| --- | --- |

—

Toho Gas Co. Ltd. (‘Toho Gas’, Japan),

| — | Galp Gás Natural Distribuição, S.A. (‘GGND’, Portugal). |
| --- | --- |

—

Galp Gás Natural Distribuição, S.A. (‘GGND’, Portugal).

ACP, Marubeni and Toho Gas acquire joint control within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation of the whole of GGND.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | for ACP: mainly active as regards private equity, infrastructure and renewable energy investments, |
| --- | --- |

—

for ACP: mainly active as regards private equity, infrastructure and renewable energy investments,

| — | for Marubeni: active in global trading across various industries, including in energy and energy related projects, |
| --- | --- |

—

for Marubeni: active in global trading across various industries, including in energy and energy related projects,

| — | for Toho Gas: mainly supplying natural gas and related services in Japan, |
| --- | --- |

—

for Toho Gas: mainly supplying natural gas and related services in Japan,

| — | for GGND: primarily active in the distribution and retail of natural gas in Portugal. |
| --- | --- |

—

for GGND: primarily active in the distribution and retail of natural gas in Portugal.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10084 — ACP/Marubeni/Toho Gas/GGND

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
#### Theresa A. Scheemaker, Respondent-Appellant, v State of New York, Appellant-Respondent.

(Claim No. 66508.)

— Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: For reasons stated in the decision of the Court of Claims, we agree that the State was negligent for failing to control the speed of vehicles passing through the subject intersection and for conducting an incomplete safety investiga*965tion of the accident site prior to the accident; that the State’s negligence was a proximate cause of the accident; that claimant also was negligent for failing to observe the other vehicle which was there to be seen; and that the apportionment of liability of 75% to claimant and 25% to the State is supported by the evidence.

Each driver’s familiarity with the accident site does not preclude liability as a matter of law. Whether claimant’s injuries were proximately caused in part by the State’s negligence presented questions of fact. The cases of *Atkinson v County of Oneida*(59 NY2d 840) and *Ball v State of New York*(96 AD2d 1139, *affd*61 NY2d 990) relied upon by the State are not controlling under the facts of this case. In both *Atkinson*and *Ball,*the drivers were aware of legally binding stop signs which, if obeyed, would have prevented the accident. The instant case differs in that there was no legally binding control governing the intersection which, if followed, would have prevented the accident. The posted advisory speed signs are not binding and were customarily ignored, which fact was known to the State. While both parties to the accident were familiar with the intersection, both were acting within the law and in accordance with common practice. Under such circumstances, the State’s failure to post lower mandatory speed limit signs at this dangerous intersection may be deemed a proximate cause of the accident.

We note finally that on this record the State did not establish a seat belt defense as a matter of law *(see, Spier v Barker,*35 NY2d 444; 1 NY PJI2d 695), and that, in any event, the trial court properly could have disregarded claimant’s alleged failure to use a seat belt since claimant’s doctor indicated that her injuries could have been caused by acute flexion rather than the impact of the collision. (Appeal from judgment of Court of Claims, Quigley, J. — negligence—automobile.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Green, Balio, Lawton and Schnepp, JJ.
Warm Water Nonnativ

Warm Water Nonnativ

Fishes in Grand Cany

Fishes in Grand Cany

Workshop at GCMRC Workshop at GCMRC 

6 and 7 December 2005 6 and 7 December 2005
Purposes Purposes

 Solicit input Solicit input

– Identification of warm water Identification of warm water nonn

nonn

– Locating Locating nonnatives nonnatives

–Control of Control of nonnatives nonnatives

 Solicit monitoring recommendat

Solicit monitoring recommendat

– Warm water nonnative fishes Warm water nonnative fishes– Native fishes Native fishes

 Develop Study Plan Develop Study Plan

– Present to AMWG March 2006 Present to AMWG March 2006
Objectives Objectives

 How will nonnative fishes affect How will nonnative fishes affect 

energy production and utilizatio

energy production and utilizatio

 What are the sources of What are the sources of nonnat

nonnat

 How do other programs control How do other programs control 

nonnatives nonnatives?

 What detection methods will be What detection methods will be 

applicable? applicable?
Objectives (continued) Objectives (continued)

 What are feasible management What are feasible management 

action levels for warm water action levels for warm water nonnative fishes? nonnative fishes?

 What control methods will be m

What control methods will be m

effective? effective?

 Are one or more refuges needed

Are one or more refuges neede

 How will success be measured? How will success be measured?
Workshop Agenda Workshop Agenda

 Background Background Control Control Detection Detection Management Action Triggers Management Action Triggers Measuring Effectiveness Measuring Effectiveness Alternatives Alternatives 

– Refuge

 Each section followed by Each section followed by 

development of Research development of Research Quest

Quest
#### JIN QING WANG, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 10-2037.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 4, 2011.

Decided: April 22, 2011.

Edward Giuliano, New York, New York, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Mary Jane Candaux, Assistant Director, Robbin K. Blaya, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent,

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jin Qing Wang, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reopen as untimely. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find no abuse of discretion. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (c)(2) (2010). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. *In re: Jin Qing Wang*(B.I.A. Aug. 11, 2010). *249We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             669
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,826
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (197)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,733
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,139
<PP&E>                                          11,095
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,449)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,940
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,277
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          7
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,345)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,940
<SALES>                                         16,021
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,233
<CGS>                                            7,287
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   34,473
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    82
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 636
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (16,876)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,876)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (16,876)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (15.89)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (15.89)


</TABLE>