alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,151,870
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              170,448,299
<ALLOWANCES>                              (10,043,561)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       7,061,978
<DEPRECIATION>                             (6,102,212)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             232,123,796
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                    209,258,561
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        69,743
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,717,833
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               232,123,796
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            47,005,851
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            30,702,729
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             6,605,514
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (645,789)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   278,468
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (161,809)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (161,809)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)


</TABLE>
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2021365EN.01001501.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 10.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 365/15 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10397 — Tecpetrol/Oaktree/Litoral Gas/ECS)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 365/09)

1.

On 2 August 2021, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2021365EN.01001501-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Tecpetrol Internacional S.L.U., belonging to the Techint Group (‘Tecpetrol’, Spain), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Oaktree Capital Group, LLC (‘Oaktree’, USA), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Litoral Gas S.A. (‘Litoral Gas’, Argentina), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Energy Consulting Services S.A. (‘ECS’, Argentina). |

Tecpetrol and Oaktree acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of Litoral Gas and ECS.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for Tecpetrol: the exploration, production, transportation and distribution of hydrocarbons, as well as power generation, in several Latin American countries, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for Oaktree: global alternative and non-traditional investment fund management, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for Litoral Gas: distribution of gas in Argentina, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for ECS: gas commercialisation services. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2021365EN.01001501-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10397 — Tecpetrol/Oaktree/Litoral Gas/ECS

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2021365EN.01001501-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2021365EN.01001501-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
# C_2021061EN.01000601.xml

| 22.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 61/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 61/6

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10190 — OTPP/KKR/Caruna Group)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 61/06)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan Board (‘OTPP’, Canada), |
| --- | --- |

—

Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan Board (‘OTPP’, Canada),

| — | KKR & Co. Inc. (‘KKR’, USA), |
| --- | --- |

—

KKR & Co. Inc. (‘KKR’, USA),

| — | Caruna Group (Finland). |
| --- | --- |

—

Caruna Group (Finland).

OTPP and KKR acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the whole of Caruna Group.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | for OTPP: the administration of pension benefits and the investment of pension plan assets of teachers in the Canadian province of Ontario, |
| --- | --- |

—

for OTPP: the administration of pension benefits and the investment of pension plan assets of teachers in the Canadian province of Ontario,

| — | for KKR: a global investment firm that manages multiple alternative asset classes including private equity, energy, infrastructure, real estate and credit, |
| --- | --- |

—

for KKR: a global investment firm that manages multiple alternative asset classes including private equity, energy, infrastructure, real estate and credit,

| — | for Caruna Group: it operates an electricity distribution network for approximately 700,000 customers in South, Southwest and West Finland, as well as in the city of Joensuu, the sub-region of Koillismaa and Satakunta. |
| --- | --- |

—

for Caruna Group: it operates an electricity distribution network for approximately 700,000 customers in South, Southwest and West Finland, as well as in the city of Joensuu, the sub-region of Koillismaa and Satakunta.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10190 — OTPP/KKR/Caruna Group

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hyperion Solutions Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Jeffrey R. Rodek, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and David W. Odell,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.

Dated: November 11, 2002


/s/ Jeffrey R. Rodek
-------------------------------------
Jeffrey R. Rodek
Chief Executive Officer

/s/ David W. Odell
-------------------------------------
David W. Odell
Chief Financial Officer
PURGATOIRE RIVER AT MADRID, CO.Latitude: 37.129Longitude: -104.64Elevation: 6261.61

PURGATOIRE RIVER AT MADRID, CO.

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Apishapa Site Page...



Apishapa

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Culebra #2 Site Page...



Culebra #2

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Whiskey Ck Site Page...



Whiskey Ck
Exhibit 4








Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 1350 of


Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350)





In connection with the Annual Report of Canadian Natural Resources Limited (the “Company”) on the Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steve W. Laut, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





DATED this 25th day of March, 2011.











SIGNED “STEVE W. LAUT”Steve W. LautPresident (Principal Executive Officer),Canadian Natural Resources Limited
# C_2021027EN.01000601.xml

| 25.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 27/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 27/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9995 — Permira Holdings Limited/Neuraxpharm Midco S.C.A.)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 27/03)

On 4 December 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9995. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9995. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
¥23-/S"

ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA# 02-14-00016-CR OFFENSE: OTHER CRIMINAL

William J. Hibler v. The State of

STYLE: Texas COUNTY: Denton

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRM TRIAL COURT: 211th District Court

DATE: 03/26/2015 Publish: NO TC CASE #: F-98-0563-C

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

William J. Hibler v. The State of

STYLE: Texas CCA#: ¥23-/g

PRO SE

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

DATE: OS[/jLD/^PtS

JUDGE: #k Ul*+*~^

Petition CCA Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE: ;

SIGNED:

PUBLISH:

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

PC:_

DNP:

MOTION FOR

ELECTRONIC RECORD
#### Anna Hall, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Harold Hall, Deceased, Appellant, v Dixie L. Bileschi, as Executrix of John Bileschi, Deceased, Individually and Doing Business as J.B. Repair Service, et al., Defendants, and Globe Indemnity Company et al., Respondents.

Present —Doerr, J. P., Denman, Green, Pine and Schnepp, JJ.
#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Storage                    
csv

      Inflow                    
csv

      Inflow Volume                    
csv

      Side Inflow                    
csv

      Side Inflow Volume                    
csv

      Unregulated Inflow                    
csv

      Unregulated Inflow Volume                    
csv

      Power Release                    
csv

      Total Release                    
csv

      Release Volume                    
csv

      Pool Elevation                    
csv

      Power Release Volume                    
csv

      Evaporation                    
csv

      Spillway Release                    
csv

      Bypass Release                    
csv

      Area                    
csv

      Delta Storage                    
csv

#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Storage                    
json

      Inflow                    
json

      Inflow Volume                    
json

      Side Inflow                    
json

      Side Inflow Volume                    
json

      Unregulated Inflow                    
json

      Unregulated Inflow Volume                    
json

      Power Release                    
json

      Total Release                    
json

      Release Volume                    
json

      Pool Elevation                    
json

      Power Release Volume                    
json

      Evaporation                    
json

      Spillway Release                    
json

      Bypass Release                    
json

      Area                    
json

      Delta Storage                    
json
#### Walters, Respondent, v. Mayhew, Appellant.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department.*

May 2, 1890.)

Ho opinion. Motion denied. See 8 N. Y. Supp. 771.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ANTHONY REID,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 236 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ANTHONY REID,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 237 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 12th day of November, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED. The Application for Leave to File Post-Submission Communication is 

GRANTED.

Chief Justice Saylor, Justice Baer and Justice Todd did not participate in the 

consideration or decision of this matter.
Listen

# Public Briefings

Visit the Commission’s YouTube page to view recordings of all recent briefings.

----

Municipal Policing and Courts: A Search for Justice or a Quest for Revenue
Event Date: March 18, 2016

Quiet Crisis: Federal Funding and Unmet Needs In Indian Country, 2016 Update
Event Date: February 19, 2016

Environmental Justice: Examining the Environmental Protection Agency’s Compliance and Enforcement of Title VI and E.O. 12,898
Event Date: February 5, 2016

An Examination of Select Post-Secondary Financial Aid Programs
Event Date: May 28, 2015

Police Use of Force: An Examination of Modern Policing Practices
Event Date: April 20, 2015

Examining Workplace Discrimination against LGBT Americans
Event Date: March 16, 2015

 The State of Civil Rights at Immigration Detention Facilities
Event Date: January 30, 2015

Racial Disparities in Stand Your Ground Laws
Event Date: October 17, 2014

Enforcement of Sexual Harassment Policy at Educational Institutions
Event Date: July 25, 2014

Patient Dumping
Event Date: March 14, 2014

-    First  
-    Previous  
-   ...  
-  2 
-  3 
-  4 
-   ...  
-   Next  
-   Last  

-  Event Calendar 
-  Public Briefings    -  Public Comments 
-  Commission Business Meetings 
-  Advisory Committees Meetings 
-  Archives
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001018737
<NAME> ESCONDIDO CONSULTING, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           7,564
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,797
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    142,048
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               151,409
<PP&E>                                       9,171,147
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,321,959
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,734,094
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          340,358
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,485,313
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,734,094
<SALES>                                        622,983
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,333,654
<CGS>                                          263,058
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,335,871
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             636,385
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                361,398
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            361,398
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   361,398
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Gilligan, Respondent, v. Gerry *et al.,*Appellants.

*(Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.*

June 16, 1890.)

Appeal from tenth district court.

Action by John Gilligan against Allston Gerry and another.

Argued before Larremore, C. J., and Bookstaver and Bisohoff, JJ.

*L. L. Kellogg,*for appellants.

Per Curiam.

After a careful perusal of the evidence in this case, we are satisfied that justice will be promoted by ordering a new trial. From that evidence it appears that in December. 1889, and for some time prior thereto, Louis Cattabery was engaged as subcontractor in doing work on the line of the New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad, in the vicinity of 170th street. While he continued this work he hired all the laborers, and no one else was responsible for their payment. On the 28th of December, 1889, the work was taken away from him by the defendants. Up to that time in December the plaintiff was employed by Cattabery and not by the defendants. McCahill was at that time paymaster for Cattabery and not for the defendants. For the work done after that time, we think it is very clear that the plaintiff was paid by McCahill, as paymaster for the defendants, partly in money and partly in a board bill, which was paid by plaintiff’s direction, who was present when the order was given. We also think the testimony of the plaintiff *956as to who were defendants’ agents in December was Improperly admitted; that the testimony does not establish such agency. It seems to us very clear that Toner was not acting for the defendants in December. For these reasons the judgment should be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event.
EXHIBIT 7


                     CONSENT OF SPROULE ASSOCIATES LIMITED,
                  INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
                  ---------------------------------------------




We  consent  to the use of our  report  with  respect  to the  reserves  data of
Canadian Natural Resources  Limited  incorporated by reference in its (i) Annual
Report (Form 40-F) for the year ended  December  31, 2008 and (ii)  Registration
Statement on Form F-9  (Registration  No.  333-146056) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.




SIGNED "SPROULE ASSOCIATES LIMITED"


Calgary, Alberta
March 25, 2009
#### FLEXITEEK AMERICAS, INC. and Flexiteek International as, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. PLASTEAK, INC. and PlasDECK, Inc., Defendants-Appellants, and Andre Batista, Defendant.

No. 2010-1256.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 27, 2011.

S. Tracy Long, Santucci, Priore, & Long, LLP, Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

Bruce H. Wilson, Akron, OH, for Defendants-Appellants.

*960Before GAJARSA, MAYER, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.

This court directed the parties to respond whether PlasTEAK, Inc. and PlasDECK, Inc.’s (PlasTEAK) appeal from the February 5, 2010 order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida granting a permanent injunction should be dismissed as moot in light of the district court’s subsequent July 20, 2010 order terminating the permanent injunction. Flexiteek Americas, Inc. and Flexiteek International AS (Flexiteek) respond and argue that this appeal is moot. The appellant, PlasTEAK, argues that this appeal is not moot.

PlasTEAK urges this court not to dismiss the appeal arguing that the appeal should continue to resolve its concerns regarding liability for infractions of the injunction between issuance of the injunction and the court’s termination order. Although that issue might present a case or controversy, it does not do so here. This appeal is of the district court’s injunction, which is no longer in effect, and not of any possible order for contempt. Notably, even if PlasTEAK were to prevail in this appeal, that would not necessarily dispose of any question as to contempt of an injunction. *See generally Emery Air Freight Corp. v. Local Union 295,*449 F.2d 586, 591 (2d Cir.1971) (“Accordingly, the preliminary injunction as granted was improper. However, this conclusion does not dispose of the question of contempt, to which we now turn.”).

Accordingly,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) This appeal is dismissed.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.