8980 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 24 / Monday, February 5, 2001 / Notices

GAS MAJOR PORTION PRICES AND DUE DATES FOR DESIGNATED AREAS NOT ASSOCIATED WITH AN INDEX ZONE—

Continued

MMS-designated areas July 2000 August 2000 Due date

Fort Belknap ............................................................................. 4.27/MMBtu ............................. 4.13/MMBtu ............................. 02/28/2001

Fort Berthold ............................................................................. 2.15/MMBtu ............................. 1.70/MMBtu ............................. 02/28/2001

Fort Peck Reservation .............................................................. 2.69/MMBtu ............................. 2.31/MMBtu ............................. 02/28/2001

Navajo Allotted Leases in the Navajo Reservation .................. 3.80/MMBtu ............................. 3.42/MMBtu ............................. 02/28/2001

Rocky Boys Reservation ........................................................... 3.02/MMBtu ............................. 2.56/MMBtu ............................. 02/28/2001

Turtle Mountain Reservation ..................................................... 1.18/MMBtu ............................. 1.18/MMBtu ............................. 02/28/2001

Ute Allotted Leases in the Uintah and Ouray Reservation ...... 3.86/MMBtu ............................. 3.15/MMBtu ............................. 02/28/2001

Ute Tribal Leases in the Uintah and Ouray Reservation ......... 3.86/MMBtu ............................. 3.15/MMBtu ............................. 02/28/2001

For information on how to report

additional royalties due to major portion

prices, please refer to our Dear Payor

letter dated December 1, 1999.

Dated: January 24, 2001.

Lucy Querques Denett,

Associate Director for Minerals Revenue

Management.

[FR Doc. 01–2979 Filed 2–2–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Reclamation

Glen Canyon Adaptive Management

Work Group (AMWG) and Glen Canyon

Technical Work Group (TWG)

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation,

Interior.

ACTION: Notice of public meetings.

SUMMARY: The Adaptive Management

Program (AMP) was implemented as a

result of the Record of Decision on the

Operation of Glen Canyon Dam Final

Environmental Impact Statement and to

comply with consultation requirements

of the Grand Canyon Protection Act

(Pub. L. 102–575) of 1992. The AMP

provides an organization and process to

ensure the use of scientific information

in decision making concerning Glen

Canyon Dam operations and protection

of the affected resources consistent with

the Grand Canyon Protection Act. The

AMP has been organized and includes

a federal advisory committee (the

AMWG), a technical work group (the

TWG), a monitoring and research center,

and independent review panels. The

TWG is a subcommittee of the AMWG

and provides technical advice and

information for the AMWG to act upon.

DATES AND LOCATION: The

Adaptive Management Work Group will

conduct the following public meetings:

Phoenix, Arizona—April 12–13, 2001.

The meeting will begin at 9:30 a.m. and

conclude at 4 p.m. on the first day and

begin at 8 a.m. and conclude at 12 noon

on the second day. The meeting will be

held at the Bureau of Indian Affairs—

Western Regional Office, 2 Arizona

Center, Conference Rooms A and B

(12th Floor), 400 North 5th Street,

Phoenix, Arizona.

Agenda: The purpose of the meeting

will be to discuss the following:

development of the AMP Strategic Plan,

basin hydrology, results from the TCD

Expert Panel Workshop, environmental

compliance, and other administrative

and resource issues pertaining to the

AMP.

Phoenix, Arizona—July 17–18, 2001.

The meeting will begin at 9:30 a.m. and

conclude at 4 p.m. on the first day and

begin at 8 a.m. and conclude at 12 noon

on the second day. The meeting will be

held at the Bureau of Indian Affairs—

Western Regional Office, 2 Arizona

Center, Conference Rooms A and B

(12th Floor), 400 North 5th Street,

Phoenix, Arizona.

Agenda: The purpose of the meeting

will be to discuss the following: the

AMP Strategic Plan, FY 2003 AMP

budget, environmental compliance, and

other administrative and resource issues

pertaining to the AMP.

DATES AND LOCATION: The

Technical Work Group will conduct the

following public meetings:

Phoenix, Arizona—February 13, 2001.

The meeting will begin at 9:30 a.m. and

conclude at 5 p.m. the first day and

begin at 8 a.m. and conclude at 12 noon

on the second day. The meeting will be

at the Crowne Plaza Hotel, 100 N. First

Street, Phoenix, Arizona, Navajo B&C

conference rooms.

Agenda: The purpose of the meeting

will be to continue work on the

Strategic Plan and to identify major

issues for the AMWG to address in April

and July, including an update on

hydrology, TWG ad hoc groups,

Protocol Evaluation Panel Report on the

Integrated Water Quality Plan, draft

reports on the TCD Expert Panel

Workshop and Stock Assessment

Workshop, and a tour of the Western

Area Power Southwest Office.

Phoenix, Arizona—March 14–15,

2001. The meeting will begin at 9:30

a.m. and conclude at 4 p.m. The

meeting will be held at the Hawthorne

Suites Hotel, I–10 and University Drive,

Phoenix, Arizona.

Agenda: The purpose of the meeting

will be to discuss the following:

Strategic Plan management objectives,

Low Steady Summer Flows Report,

TWG River Trip on March 24–31, and

other administrative and resource issues

pertaining to the AMP.

Phoenix, Arizona—May 30–31, 2001.

The meeting will begin at 9:30 a.m. and

conclude at 4 p.m. The meeting will be

held at the Bureau of Indian Affairs—

Western Regional Office, 2 Arizona

Center, Conference Rooms A and B

(12th Floor), 400 North 5th Street,

Phoenix, Arizona.

Agenda: The purpose of the meeting

will be to discuss the following: Final

results of the Low Steady Summer

Flows, discussion of Strategic Plan Ad

Hoc Committee work, agenda items for

the AMWG meeting to be held July 17–

18, 2001, and other administrative and

resource issues pertaining to the AMP.

Agenda items may be revised prior to

any of the meetings. Final agendas will

be posted 15 days in advance of each

meeting and can be found on the Bureau

of Reclamation’s website under

Environmental Programs at: http://

www.uc.usbr.gov. Time will be allowed

on each agenda for any individual or

organization wishing to make formal

oral comments (limited to 10 minutes)

at the meetings.

To allow full consideration of

information by the TWG and AMWG

members, written notice must be

provided to Randall Peterson, Bureau of

Reclamation, Upper Colorado Regional

Office, 125 South State Street, Room

6107, Salt Lake City, Utah 84138–1102;

telephone (801) 524–3758; faxogram

(801) 524–3858; E-mail at:

rpeterson@uc.usbr.gov at least FIVE (5)

days prior to the meeting. Any written

comments received will be provided to

the TWG and AMWG members at the

meetings.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Randall Peterson, telephone (801) 524–

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 24 / Monday, February 5, 2001 / Notices 8981

1The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19

CFR 207.2(f)).

2Neither former Commissioner Thelma J. Askey

nor Commissioner Dennis M. Devaney participated.

1The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19

CFR § 207.2(f))

2 Vice Chairman Okun, former Commissioner

Askey, and Commissioner Devaney not

participating. Commissioner Bragg dissenting.

3 Vice Chairman Okun, former Commissioner

Askey, and Commissioner Devaney not

participating.

1The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19

CFR 207.2(f)).

2Commissioner Dennis M. Devaney not

participating.

3Commissioner Lynn M. Bragg found that critical

circumstances exist with regard to those imports of

the subject merchandise from Italy and the

Philippines that were subject to affirmative critical

circumstances determinations by the Department of

Commerce.

3758; faxogram (801) 524–3858;

rpeterson@uc.usbr.gov.

Dated: January 31, 2001.

Larry L. Todd,

Director, Operations, (Exercising the

Commissioner’s authority).

[FR Doc. 01–2975 Filed 2–2–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P

INTERNATIONAL TRADE

COMMISSION

[Investigations Nos. 731–TA–671–673

(Review)]

Silicomanganese From Brazil, China,

and Ukraine

Determinations

On the basis of the record 1 developed

in the subject five-year reviews, the

United States International Trade

Commission determines,2 pursuant to

section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930

(19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act), that

revocation of the antidumping duty

orders on silicomanganese from Brazil

and China and termination of the

suspended investigation on

silicomanganese from Ukraine would be

likely to lead to continuation or

recurrence of material injury to an

industry in the United States within a

reasonably foreseeable time.

Background

The Commission instituted these

reviews on November 2, 1999 (64 FR

59209), and determined on February 3,

2000, that it would conduct full reviews

(64 FR 7891, February 16, 2000). Notice

of the scheduling of the Commission’s

reviews and of a public hearing to be

held in connection therewith was given

by posting copies of the notice in the

Office of the Secretary, U.S.

International Trade Commission,

Washington, DC, and by publishing the

notice in the Federal Register on August

14, 2000 (64 F.R. 49595). The hearing

was held in Washington, DC, on

November 14, 2000, and all persons

who requested the opportunity were

permitted to appear in person or by

counsel.

The Commission transmitted its

determinations in these reviews to the

Secretary of Commerce on January 25,

2001. The views of the Commission are

contained in USITC Publication 3386

(January 2001), entitled

Silicomanganese from Brazil, China,

and Ukraine: Investigations Nos. 731-

TA–671–673 (Review).

Issued: January 31, 2001.

By order of the Commission.

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01–2966 Filed 2–2–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

INTERNATIONAL TRADE

COMMISSION

[Investigations Nos. 731–TA–470–472

(Review)]

Silicon Metal From Argentina, Brazil,

and China

Determinations

On the basis of the record 1 developed

in the subject five-year reviews, the

United States International Trade

Commission determines, pursuant to

section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930

(19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act), that

revocation of the antidumping duty

order on silicon metal from Argentina

would not be likely to lead to

continuation or recurrence of material

injury to an industry in the United

States within a reasonably foreseeable

time.2 The Commission further

determines that revocation of the

antidumping duty orders on silicon

metal from Brazil and China would be

likely to lead to continuation or

recurrence of material injury to an

industry in the United States within a

reasonably foreseeable time.3

Background

The Commission instituted these

reviews on November 2, 1999 (64 FR

59209) and determined on February 3,

2000 that it would conduct full reviews

(65 FR 7891, February 16, 2000). Notice

of the scheduling of the Commission’s

reviews and of a public hearing to be

held in connection therewith was given

by posting copies of the notice in the

Office of the Secretary, U.S.

International Trade Commission,

Washington, DC, and by publishing the

notice in the Federal Register on August

14, 2000 (65 FR 49595). The hearing was

held in Washington, DC, on November

14, 2000, and all persons who requested

the opportunity were permitted to

appear in person or by counsel.

The Commission transmitted its

determinations in these reviews to the

Secretary of Commerce on January 25,

2001. The views of the Commission are

contained in USITC Publication 3385

(January 2001), entitled Silicon Metal

from Argentina, Brazil, and China:

Investigations Nos. 731–TA–470–472

(Review).

Issued: January 31, 2001.

By order of the Commission.

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01–2967 Filed 2–2–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

INTERNATIONAL TRADE

COMMISSION

[Investigations Nos. 731–TA–865–867

(Final)]

Certain Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe

Fittings From Italy, Malaysia, and the

Philippines

Determinations

On the basis of the record 1 developed

in the subject investigations, the United

States International Trade Commission

determines,2 pursuant to section 735(b)

of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.

1673d(b)) (the Act), that an industry in

the United States is materially injured

by reason of imports of certain stainless

steel butt-weld pipe fittings from Italy,

Malaysia, and the Philippines, provided

for in subheading 7307.23.00 of the

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the

United States, that have been found by

the Department of Commerce to be sold

in the United States at less than fair

value (LTFV). The Commission further

determines that critical circumstances

do not exist with regard to those imports

of the subject merchandise from Italy

and the Philippines that were subject to

affirmative critical circumstances

determinations by the Department of

Commerce.3

Background

The Commission instituted these

investigations effective December 29,

1999, following receipt of a petition

filed with the Commission and the

Department of Commerce by Alloy

Piping Products, Inc., Shreveport, LA;