alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- Skip to Primary Navigation
      - Skip to Main Content
      - Skip to Footer

          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   

        -  Water & Power            - Dams
          - Powerplants
          - Projects
          - Agrimet/Hydromet
          - Water Operations 
        -  Resources & Research            - Programs
          - Technical Service Center
          - Research & Development
          - Reclamation Manual
          - Reclamation Information Sharing Environment (RISE)
          - Environmental Resources/Reports
          - Library 
        -  About Us            - Mission
          - Fact Sheet
          - Commissioner
          - Addresses/Contacts
          - Organizational Chart
          - Leadership Bios
          - Employment
          - Contact 
        -  Recreation & Public Use            - Find Recreation
          - Recreation.gov
          - Public Use 
        -  News & Multimedia            - News Releases
          - News Stories
          - Speeches
          - Congressional Testimony
          - Fact Sheets
          - Photos
          - Multimedia
          - Social Media 

# WaterSMART

Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Program

            - Reclamation
            - WaterSMART
            - Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Program
            - Selected Applications

WaterSMART              - WaterSMART
              - Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Program                  - Previous Grant Selections
                - Previous Funding Opportunity Announcements
                - Selected Applications
                - Contacts 
              - Applied Science Grants
              - Baseline Assessments and Pilots
              - Basin Studies
              - Cooperative Watershed Management Program
              - Drought Program
              - Environmental Water Resources Projects
              - Project Design Grants
              - Reservoir Operation Pilots
              - Small-Scale Water Efficiency Projects
              - Water and Energy Efficiency Grants
              - Water Conservation Field Services Program
              - Water Recycling and Desalination
              - Water Strategy Grants

# Selected Applications

2023

Applications to be added early calendar year 2024.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*Last Updated: 12/19/23*

## More Information about the Bureau of Reclamation

## Stay in Touch

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

            - Contact Us
            - Site Index
            - Accessibility
            - Disclaimer
            - DOI
            - FOIA
            - No Fear Act
            - Notices
            - Privacy Policy
            - Quality of Information
            - USA.gov
            - Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-11113

Summary Calendar

JAMES K. CHAMBERS,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

A-AVALON CORRECTIONS SERVICES, INCORPORATED; SOUTHERN 

CORRECTIONS, INCORPORATED; L. SERRANO, Administrator,

Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:15-CV-387

Before KING, DENNIS, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

James K. Chambers has filed an interlocutory appeal in his 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983 action challenging the district court’s partial grant of summary 

judgment in favor of Avalon Corrections Services, Incorporated (“Avalon”) and 

Southern Corrections, Incorporated (“Southern”). See FED. R. CIV. P. 54(b). He 

also challenges the district court’s denial of a restraining order against Avalon, 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 9, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-11113 Document: 00513629519 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/09/2016
No. 15-11113

2

Southern, and their employee, L. Serrano. Finally, he seeks an injunction

pending appeal.

In his appellate brief, Chambers does not address the district court’s 

dismissal of his claims against Avalon and Southern. He does not address the 

district court’s conclusion that Chambers failed to identify an unconstitutional 

policy or custom; instead, he rehashes his claim that Serrano violated his 

constitutional rights by denying him medical treatment. He likewise does not 

address the district court’s denial of his request for a temporary restraining 

order.

When an appellant fails to identify any error in the district court’s 

analysis, it is the same as if the appellant had not appealed that issue. 

Brinkmann v. Dallas Cty. Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 

1987). Although pro se briefs are afforded liberal construction, arguments 

must be briefed in order to be preserved. Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-

25 (5th Cir. 1993). Because Chambers fails to raise any argument regarding 

the district court’s dismissal of his claims against Avalon and Southern and 

the denial of a temporary restraining order, these claims are abandoned.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED, and the motion for 

injunctive relief pending appeal is DENIED.

 Case: 15-11113 Document: 00513629519 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/09/2016
Listen

# 2014 FOIA Annual Report

March 1, 2015

Annual Report

Chief FOIA Officer Report

Annual Report (XML)

-  All Reports 
-  Annual Statutory Enforcement 
-  Briefing Reports 
-  Advisory Committees Reports 
-  Budget and Performance 
-  FOIA Reports 
-  Data Inventory Program 
-  Civil Rights Complaints 
-  Historical Publications 
-  Archives
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hyperion Solutions Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Jeffrey R. Rodek, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

Dated: November 7, 2003

/s/ JEFFREY R. RODEK

Jeffrey R. Rodek
Chief Executive Officer
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2021421EN.01000601.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 18.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 421/6 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10479 – Telenet/Willemen Groep/Livit)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 421/05)

1.

On 8 October 2021, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2021421EN.01000601-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Willemen Groep NV (‘Willemen’, Belgium), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Telenet BV (‘Telenet’, Belgium), belonging to Liberty Global Group, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Livit BV (‘Livit’, Belgium). |

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares in a newly created company constituting a joint venture.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for Willemen: construction and real estate project development services concerning various types of buildings, including residential housing units., |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for Telenet: retail audiovisual services and fixed and mobile communication services, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for Livit: rental of furnished living units and related services. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2021421EN.01000601-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10479 – Telenet/Willemen Groep/Livit

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2021421EN.01000601-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2021421EN.01000601-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
# C_2021212EN.01000101.xml

| 4.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 212/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 212/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10220 — TPG Capital/AT&T/AT&T US video business)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 212/01)

On 10 May 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10220. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10220. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

## Filings Instituting Proceedings

*Docket Numbers:* RP21-1096-000.

*Applicants:* El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.

*Description:* § 4(d) Rate Filing: Non-Conforming Agreement Update (SoCal Sept-Oct 2021) to be effective 9/3/2021.

*Filed Date:* 9/2/21.

*Accession Number:* 20210902-5127.

*Comment Date:* 5 p.m. ET 9/14/21.

*Docket Numbers:* RP20-921-000.

*Applicants:* Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, L.L.C.

*Description:* Refund Report: RP20-921 Refund Report to be effective N/A.

*Filed Date:* 9/2/21.

*Accession Number:* 20210902-5092.

*Comment Date:* 5 p.m. ET 9/14/21.

The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system (*https://elibrary.ferc.gov/​idmws/​search/​fercgensearch.asp*) by querying the docket number.

Any person desiring to protest in any the above proceedings must file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date.

eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying facilities filings can be found at: *http://www.ferc.gov/​docs-filing/​efiling/​filing-req.pdf.* For other information, call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Dated: September 3, 2021.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2021-19530 Filed 9-9-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 210 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt student workers 

for purposes of determining a higher education institution’s employer 

health care shared responsibility. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 8, 2015 

Mr. MEADOWS (for himself, Mrs. BROOKS of Indiana, Mr. RODNEY DAVIS of 

Illinois, Mr. DUNCAN of South Carolina, Mrs. ELLMERS, Mr. HANNA, Mr. 

JONES, Mr. MURPHY of Florida, Mr. RIBBLE, Mr. ROKITA, Mr. ROSKAM, 

and Mr. TURNER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt 

student workers for purposes of determining a higher 

education institution’s employer health care shared responsibility. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Student Worker Ex5 emption Act of 2015’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 210 IH

1 SEC. 2. STUDENT WORKERS EXEMPTED FROM DETERMINA2 TION OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION’S 

3 EMPLOYER HEALTH CARE SHARED RESPON4 SIBILITY. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c) of section 4980H 

6 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by re7 designating paragraphs (5), (6), and (7) as paragraphs 

8 (6), (7), and (8), respectively, and by inserting after para9 graph (4) the following new paragraph: 

10 ‘‘(5) EXCEPTION FOR STUDENT WORKERS.— 

11 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Services rendered as a 

12 student worker to an eligible educational insti13 tution (as defined in section 25A(f)(2)) shall 

14 not be taken into account under this section as 

15 service provided by an employee. 

16 ‘‘(B) STUDENT WORKER.—For purposes of 

17 this paragraph, the term ‘student worker’ 

18 means, with respect to any eligible educational 

19 institution (as so defined), any individual who— 

20 ‘‘(i) is employed by such institution, 

21 and 

22 ‘‘(ii) is a student enrolled at the insti23 tution and is carrying a full-time academic 

24 workload, as determined by the institution, 

25 under a standard applicable to all students 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•HR 210 IH

1 enrolled in a particular educational pro2 gram.’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 this section shall apply to months beginning after Decem5 ber 31, 2014. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 99
                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


<PAGE>

      Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Each of the undersigned, Paul L. Thomas and Ronald W. Hill, the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of CBES Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of the Company, that
he has reviewed the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-KSB for the year
ended June 30, 2002 and that to the best of his knowledge:

       (1)    the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a)
              of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2)    the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.


September 27, 2002                               /s/ Paul L. Thomas
---------------------------                      -------------------------------
Date                                             Paul L. Thomas
                                                 Chief Executive Officer

September 27, 2002                               /s/ Ronald W. Hill
---------------------------                      -------------------------------
Date                                             Ronald W. Hill
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
----

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual  report of Silver Dragon Resources Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the  period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc Hazout, Chief Executive  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  

(1)  The Report fully complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act  of 1934; and 

(2)  The information contained in  the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition  and results of operations of the Company. 
|                                                                                                                                   | Date: May 15, 2007 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|
|                                                                                                                                   |               |   |
|  
 By:
        /s/ Marc Hazout
 
 
Marc Hazout              President and Chief Executive Officer
  |
#### Andrew F. Capoccia, P. C., et al., Appellants, v Dominick Brognano, Respondent.

— Motion granted and appeal dismissed. *(See, Matter of New York Life Ins. Co. v Galvin,*41 AD2d 83, *mod*35 NY2d 52.)
Flaming Gorge Technical Working Group

Meeting Notes

Friday, May 25, 2018

In attendance: Jed Parker, Heather Patno, Jerry Wilhite, Kevin Bestgen, Tom Chart, Randy 

Staffeldt, Tildon Jones, Matt Breen

1. Possible flow scenarios

a. An overview of the difference in projected flows in the Yampa River between 

5/23 and 5/25.

b. The 5/25 ESP run highlights that the Yampa projection have turned favorable in 

terms of benefits to floodplain operations.

2. Current CBRFC projections for Jensen gage

a. Overview of projected flows given for Jensen gage which shows a number of 

days above 11,000 cfs under current release scheme.

3. Benefits of increased bypass flows from Flaming Gorge Dam on Stuart Lake operations 

was discussed. Generally, higher flows would benefit larval entrainment at Stuart Lake.

4. Recovery program expressed desire to revisit previous Reclamation decision to not 

release above power plant capacity. Recovery program informed that a written request 

would be needed, and that if received, would be passed on to leadership, though it is 

unlikely to be implemented.

5. Recovery program agreed to write a formal request for increased releases.

1. Next FGTWG – Monday, May 29 at 12:00 pm
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       2,858,625
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             1,300,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  4,301,985
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       7,480,583
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         7,456,739
<LOANS>                                     32,691,757
<ALLOWANCE>                                    365,231
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              52,144,638
<DEPOSITS>                                  45,535,324
<SHORT-TERM>                                   400,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            581,525
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,644,790
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,982,999
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              52,144,638
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              3,103,798
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              907,902
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             4,011,700
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,749,666
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,770,743
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,240,957
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  140,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              14,124
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,229,330
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                378,546
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     301,843
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   301,843
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .57
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                    184,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                30,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               386,561
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  163,645
<RECOVERIES>                                    49,436
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              365,231
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           365,231
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
USGS 11517500 - SHASTA R NR YREKA, CALatitude: 41.823Longitude: -122.594Elevation: 2000

USGS 11517500 - SHASTA R NR YREKA, CA