alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Storage                    
csv

      Pool Elevation                    
csv

      Inflow                    
csv

      Inflow Volume                    
csv

      Total Release                    
csv

      Release Volume                    
csv

      Area                    
csv

      Delta Storage                    
csv

      Evaporation                    
csv

#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Storage                    
json

      Pool Elevation                    
json

      Inflow                    
json

      Inflow Volume                    
json

      Total Release                    
json

      Release Volume                    
json

      Area                    
json

      Delta Storage                    
json

      Evaporation                    
json
# L_2010252EN.01020601.xml

| 25.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 252/206 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 252/206

---

DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

of 5 May 2010

on the closure of Eurojust’s accounts for the financial year 2008

(2010/545/EU)

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,

having regard to the final annual accounts of Eurojust for the financial year 2008,

having regard to the Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of Eurojust for the financial year 2008, together with Eurojust’s replies (1),

having regard to the Council’s recommendation of 16 February 2010 (5827/2010 — C7-0061/2010),

having regard to Article 276 of the EC Treaty and Article 319 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (2), and in particular Article 185 thereof,

having regard to Council Decision 2002/187/JHA of 28 February 2002 setting up Eurojust with a view to reinforcing the fight against serious crime (3), and in particular Article 36 thereof,

having regard to Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 of 19 November 2002 on the framework Financial Regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 185 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 (4), and in particular Article 94 thereof,

having regard to Rule 77 of, and Annex VI to, its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinion of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A7-0093/2010),

| 1. | Approves the closure of Eurojust’s accounts for the financial year 2008; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward this Decision to the Administrative Director of Eurojust, the Council, the Commission and the Court of Auditors, and to arrange for its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union (L series). |
| --- | --- |

2.

The President

Jerzy BUZEK

The Secretary-General

Klaus WELLE

---

(1)  
  OJ C 304, 15.12.2009, p. 131.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 63, 6.3.2002, p. 1.

3

(4)  
  OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p. 72.

4

---
TEIEATTORNEY GENERAL OFTEXAS

Hon. Travis D. Shelton OpinionNo. S-29 District Attorney Lubbock,Texas Re: Constitutionality of Chapter 354, Acts of the 52~ Legislature, Dear Sir: 1951.

You have requestedour opinion as to the constitutionality

of Chapter 354, Acts of the 52nd Legislature, 1951,being House Bill No. 744, and known as Article 1.436c, Vernon's Penal Code. The caption of such Act reads as follows: "An Act making it unlawful to steal any internalcombustionengine, electricmotor, water well pump or battery used for lrrigatlon or livestock wateringpurposes or any accessorial part of anp such engine,motor, pump or battery;making such offense a felony or a misdemeanor;prescribingpuM..bent therefor;and declaringan emergency. There is no furtherdesignationin the body of the Act as felony or misdemeanor.

Section 35 of Article III of the Constitution of Texas provides in part as follows:

"Nbbill

. . . shall containmore than one subject,which shall be expressed in its title.

. .' In passing on the constltutlonalltg of a similar caption to Article 1442a,V.P.C., the Court of CriminalAppeals has held:

II

. . . Chapter 15, Acts of First Called Session of Thirty-ninthLegislature,contains the law, If any there be, making the theft of chIckeni a felony. The caption of the Act contained In said Chapter is as follows:Hon. Travis D. Shelton, page 2 (S-29)

"'AnAct making it unlawful for the fraudulenttaking of any chicken or turkey, making such offense a felony or a mlsdemeanor, prescribing punishmenttherefor; and declaringan emergency.' "It is thus declared that the offense which is to be createdby, and found in, the body of the act, Is 'a felony or a misdemeanor.' Nothing later on or further sheds light on the inquiryabove raised. Manifestly the act denouncedcannot be both a felony and a misdemeanor. If this be true, the caption of the bill in question is not In compliancewith the commands of Section 35, Art. 3, of our Constitution. As said in ~dn'35, Art. 3, one object of Secif'o& ConstitutionIs to prevent the combinationof incongruous enactments in a statute. The attempted making of a single act, viz, the taking of a ohicken or a turkey, a felony or a misdemeanor,would be the combiningof incongruous enactments. So this title is in direct violationof the Constitution." Redding v. State, 109 Tex. Crlm. 551, 552, $.WZ’d 3b0, 361 (1928). The Redding case is controllingand has not been overruled. Therefore,'itis the opinion of this office that Chapter 354, Aots of,the 52nd Legislature, 1951, known as Article 1.436~ V.P.C., contains two incongruous subjects in contravention of Section 35 of Article III of the Constitutionof Texas, and is unconstitutional.

SUMMARY

Chapter 354, Acts of the 52nd Leglslature, 19.51,

known as Article 14360 V.P.C., contains two incongruoussubjects In contravention of Section 35 of Article III of theHon. Travis D. Shelton, page 3 (S-29)

Constitutionof Texas, and is therefore unconstitutional.

APPROVED: Rudy Rice State AffairsDlvlsion Willis E. Gresham Reviewer Yours very truly, JOHN BEN SHEPPERD AttorneyGeneral

C. K. Richards Reviewer Robert S. Trottl First Assistant John Ben Shepperd Attorney General JA/rt
Motion Granted and Abatement Order filed June 26, 2018 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-17-00206-CV

____________

JUAN CARLOS RUVALCABA, ELAM MEAT MARKET, L.L.C., AND 

SUPERMERCADO LATINO, L.L.C., Appellants

V.

RAFAEL ORTEGA, ET AL, Appellees

On Appeal from the 215th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-33606

ABATEMENT ORDER

Appellee filed an unopposed motion for an extension to file its brief on the 

ground that the parties have settled the case in principle. The motion is GRANTED

and the court orders as follows:

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s 

active docket until August 26, 2018. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s 

active docket after that time, or when a motion to dismiss the appeal or other 
2

dispositive motion is filed, whichever is earlier. The court will also consider an 

appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the court may 

reinstate the appeal on its own motion.

PER CURIAM
# L_2009127EN.01002101.xml

| 26.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 127/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 127/21

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 423/2009 of 20 May 2009 on the issue of licences for importing rice under the tariff quotas opened for the May 2009 subperiod by Regulation (EC) No 1529/2007

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 125 of 21 May 2009
  )

On page 68, the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 423/2009 should read as follows:

‘ANNEX

Quantities to be allocated for the May 2009 subperiod and quantities available for the following subperiod under Regulation (EC) No 1529/2007

| Origin/product | Order number | Allocation coefficient for the month of May 2009 subperiod | Total quantities available for the September 2009 subperiod (kg) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| States forming part of the Cariforum region (Article 1(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1529/2007)






  — | CN codes 1006 , except CN code 1006 10 10 |

Origin/product

Order number

Allocation coefficient for the month of May 2009 subperiod

Total quantities available for the September 2009 subperiod (kg)

States forming part of the Cariforum region (Article 1(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1529/2007)

—

CN codes 1006 , except CN code 1006 10 10

09.4220

— (2)

130 197 633

OCTs (Article 1(2)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EC) No 1529/2007)

| — | CN code 1006 |
| --- | --- |

—

CN code 1006

| (a) | Netherlands Antilles and Aruba: |
| --- | --- |

(a)

Netherlands Antilles and Aruba:

09.4189

— (2)

21 500 000

| (b) | least-developed OCTs: |
| --- | --- |

(b)

least-developed OCTs:

09.4190

— (1)

10 000 000

---

(1)  No allocation coefficient applied for this subperiod: no licence applications were sent to the Commission.

1

(2)  Applications cover quantities less than or equal to the quantities available: all applications are therefore acceptable.’

2

---
NRCS 810 - TAYLOR BUTTELatitude: 42.691Longitude: -121.426Elevation: None

NRCS 810 - Taylor Butte

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Crazyman Flat Site Page...



Crazyman Flat

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Summer Rim Site Page...



Summer Rim

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Taylor Butte Site Page...



Taylor Butte
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Pest Management Research: Sidney, MT
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    NPARL
                        Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory
                                    Agricultural Systems Research Unit
                                    Grasshoppers: Their Biology, Identification and ManagementSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us






USDA Research | Contact Infoheadline bar Sidney, MT ARS Research
               RIL Grasshopper Publications


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### In the Matter of George Semkus, Appellant, v Brian Malone, as Inspector General of the New York State Department of Correctional Services, Respondent.

— Casey, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term (Kahn, J.), entered May 13, 1986 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition for failure to comply with the Statute of Limitations.

Respondent states in his brief that "[i]n light of the Fourth Department’s expungement order, the Department of Correctional Services will reevaluate petitioner’s status on the record as expunged”. We have been advised that such a reevaluation has been completed and that a new final determination has been issued. Accordingly, this proceeding to review the prior determination has become moot. We think it appropriate to dismiss the appeal since no useful purpose would be served by deciding whether the proceeding was timely commenced. Petitioner, of course, may institute a new proceeding to challenge the latest determination if he remains dissatisfied.

Appeal dismissed, as moot, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Weiss, Yesawich, Jr., and Levine, JJ., concur.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shannon LITTLEBIRD, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-30169.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 16, 2007.*

Filed April 20, 2007.

Marcia Good Hurd, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Billings, MT, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Steven C. Babcock, Esq., Federal Defenders of Montana, Billings, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.

*785Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Shannon Littlebird appeals from his jury trial conviction and 212-month sentence for aggravated sexual abuse, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2241(a).

Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Littlebird’s counsel has filed a brief stating that he finds no meritorious issues for review, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Littlebird has filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our examination of the briefs and our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no arguable issues for review on direct appeal.1

We GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw and DENY all other pending motions.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

1

. To the extent Littlebird seeks to raise a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, we decline to reach this issue on direct appeal. *See United States v. McKenna,*327 F.3d 830, 845 (9th Cir.2003).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

CITY OF PHILADELPHIA,

Respondent

v.

DY PROPERTIES, LLC,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 20 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 25th day of June, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-11-000040813-JUL-201110:36 AM
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Digital Lightwave, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the report), I Kenneth T. Myers, Chief Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: March 31, 2009



By:

/s/ KENNETH T. MYERSKenneth T. MyersPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.2

Informational Addendum to Report on Form 10-Q

Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Not Filed Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

The undersigned Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of OYO Geospace Corporation does hereby certify as follows:

Solely for the purpose of meeting the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and
solely to the extent this certification may be applicable to this Report on Form 10-Q, the undersigned hereby certifies that this Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and the information contained in this Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OYO Geospace Corporation.



/s/ Thomas T. McEntireName:

Thomas T. McEntireTitle:

Chief Financial Officer and SecretaryFebruary 4, 2011
PROVO RIVER NEAR MIDWAY, UT.Latitude: 40.507Longitude: -111.45Elevation: 5493

PROVO RIVER NEAR MIDWAY, UT.

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Wolf Creek Peak Site Page...



Wolf Creek Peak

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Beaver Divide Site Page...



Beaver Divide

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Thaynes Canyon Site Page...



Thaynes Canyon

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Trial Lake Site Page...



Trial Lake
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION


OF


PRINCIPAL
EXECUTIVE OFFICER




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Manhattan
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. does hereby certify that, to the best of his
knowledge:


(a)      the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Manhattan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. for the quarter
ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(b)      information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Manhattan Pharmaceuticals,
Inc.




Dated:
      November 15, 2010
                  /s/ Michael G.
      McGuinnessMichael
      G. McGuinnessPrincipal
      Executive and Financial Officer
#### HOMISTON v. LONG ISLAND R. CO.

(Superior Court of New York City, General Term.

May 7, 1894.)

Appeal—Review—Objections not. Raised Below.

Parts of charge to which no objections were taken will not be reviewed on appeal.

Appeal from jury term.

Action by Henry W. Homiston against the Long Island Railroad Company. From a judgment entered on a verdict in favor of defendant, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

Argued before SEDGWICK, C. J., and McADAM, J.

William H. Law, for appellant.

E. B. Hinsdale, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Upon a former trial of this action the plaintiff had a verdict, which, on appeal from the judgment entered thereon, was set aside by the general term for errors of law (see 22 N. Y. Supp. 738), all of which were obviated on the trial we are called upon to review. The facts, though requiring submission to the jury, appear substantially as they did upon the first trial, and we are therefore required upon this appeal to consider only the exceptions that appear upon the present record, and these seem to be without merit. The portions of the charge which might bear criticism were not excepted to, so that the trial judge had no opportunity to correct, explain, or modify the language used, as he might have done. The verdict is amply sustained by the evidence, and, according to the law of the case as settled by the court upon the first appeal, the judgment is right, and must, with the order denying the motion for a new trial, be affirmed, with costs.
**EXHIBIT
      13.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of RADCOM Ltd. (the “Company”)
      for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, David Ripstein, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:
              June 27,
              2007
            
            
            /s/
              David RipsteinDavid
                Ripstein
              Chief
                Executive Officer
              (Principal
                Executive Officer)
# C_2021005EN.01000601.xml

| 7.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 5/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 5/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10058 — Porsche/Transnet/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 5/06)

On 21 December 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M10058. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M10058. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---