alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021215EN.01000401.xml

| 7.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 215/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 215/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10087 — Proximus/Nexus Infrastructure/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 215/04)

On 24 March 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10087. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10087. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 173 (Friday, September 10, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 50696]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19673]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of Commission public business meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: Friday, September 10, 2021, 12:00 p.m. EST.

ADDRESSES: Meeting to take place by telephone and is open to the public 
by telephone: 1-866-556-2429, Conference ID #: 9502965.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Angelia Rorison: 202-376-7700; 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#85f5f0e7e9ece6e4e3e3e4ecf7f6c5f0f6e6e6f7abe2eaf3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c8b8bdaaa4a1aba9aeaea9a1babb88bdbbababbae6afa7be">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the Government in 
Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), the Commission on Civil Rights is holding 
a meeting to discuss the Commission's business for the month of August. 
This meeting is open to the public. Computer assisted real-time 
transcription (CART) will be provided. The web link to access CART (in 
English) on Friday, September 10, 2021, is https://www.streamtext.net/player?event=USCCR. Please note that CART is text-only translation that 
occurs in real time during the meeting and is not an exact transcript. 
Schedule subject to change, for updates visit the USCCR Twitter at 
www.twitter.com/usccrgov.

Meeting Agenda

I. Approval of Agenda
II. Business Meeting
    A. Presentations from Advisory Committees to the Commission on 
Recent Reports/Memo Releases
    B. Discussion and Vote on Advisory Committee Appointments
    C. Vote to Amend October 2022 Business Meeting Date
    D. Discussion and Vote on Commission Statement Regarding School 
Safety
    E. Management and Operations
<bullet> Staff Director's Report
III. Adjourn Meeting

    Dated: August 31, 2021.
Angelia Rorison,
Director of Media and Communications.
[FR Doc. 2021-19673 Filed 9-8-21; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### FERRIS, Respondent, v. FERRIS et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

Dec. 8, 1896.)

Action by Annie W. Ferris against A. Morton B'erris, Floyd Ferris and William A. Kimball. Wheeler H. Peekham, for appellants. Esek Cowen, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We think this judgment should be affirmed for substantially the same reasons as those assigned in the case of Ferris v. Same Defendants (decided herewith) 42 N. Y. Supp. 1125. Irrespective of the question of the agency of the plaintiff’s husband to make the contract in her behalf, to discharge the old firm as a debtor, and accept the new firm instead, we deem the evidence sufficient to support the referee in holding that no such contract was actually made by the plaintiff’s husband, and in rejecting the defense of novation. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Foreign Interference in or Undermining Public Confidence in United States Elections

                        On September 12, 2018, by Executive Order 13848, the President declared a national emergency pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701*et seq.*) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States constituted by the threat of foreign interference in or undermining public confidence in United States elections.                    

Although there has been no evidence of a foreign power altering the outcomes or vote tabulation in any United States election, foreign powers have historically sought to exploit America's free and open political system. In recent years, the proliferation of digital devices and internet-based communications has created significant vulnerabilities and magnified the scope and intensity of the threat of foreign interference. The ability of persons located, in whole or in substantial part, outside the United States to interfere in or undermine public confidence in United States elections, including through the unauthorized accessing of election and campaign infrastructure or the covert distribution of propaganda and disinformation, continues to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States. For this reason, the national emergency declared on September 12, 2018, must continue in effect beyond September 12, 2021. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13848 with respect to the threat of foreign interference in or undermining public confidence in United States elections.

                        This notice shall be published in the                         *Federal Register*                         and transmitted to the Congress.                    

[FR Doc. 2021-19625

Billing code 3295-F1-P
_______________________________________ __ 

### Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



## November 25, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice



## 137114 Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n 

## PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, J ustices



## v SC: 137114 COA: 276126 St Clair CC: 06-000258-FC MOSES RABBIT KIRSCHKE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 8, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

1117 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 25, 2008

Clerk
UNCOMPAHGRE RIVER AT COLONA, COLORADOLatitude: 38.331Longitude: -107.78Elevation: 6332

UNCOMPAHGRE RIVER AT COLONA, COLORADO

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Idarado Site Page...



Idarado

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Mineral Creek Site Page...



Mineral Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Red Mountain Pass Site Page...



Red Mountain Pass
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           7,736
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,966
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,106
<INVENTORY>                                     12,906
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,913
<PP&E>                                          21,273
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,053
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  54,438
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,611
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           138
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,689
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    54,438
<SALES>                                         80,159
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                80,159
<CGS>                                           54,244
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,589
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,777
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,595
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,182
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,182
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .58
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                           24664
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    29723
<ALLOWANCES>                                      5000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 83404
<PP&E>                                         1331255
<DEPRECIATION>                                  416623
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1231735
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           650034
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         10286
<OTHER-SE>                                     1727376
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1231735
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2582655
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3612813
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               17835
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (1047993)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (1047993)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (1047993)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.11)
        


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John W. Meisser, Appellant.

The complainant testified the defendant forced his way into his house at knifepoint, tied him up, and stole some of his property. The defendant went upstairs, and the complainant could hear him rummaging through drawers and closets. A tenant of the complainant owner subsequently discovered that a ring was missing from his room as well.

The People met their burden of proving the defendant’s *681guilt beyond a reasonable doubt by means of the testimony of the complainant, who knew him. The defendant argues that it would have been foolish for him to rob the complainant whom he had known and that the complainant fabricated his story to receive insurance benefits. The defendant did not take the stand. The issue of credibility was one for the jury to determine, and it is to be accorded the greatest weight on appeal *(see, People v Randolph,*116 AD2d 674).

The defendant argues that it was error to permit evidence as to the theft of the ring from the tenant, because this theft had not been reported. The tenant testified that when he returned on the day of the robbery, he found his room in disarray, his jewelry box emptied and his ring missing. Testimony by another witness brought out that the defendant had sold him the ring in question. The testimony regarding the theft of this ring was not improperly admitted into evidence. The ring was material circumstantial evidence of the defendant’s intent to commit a crime in the dwelling, an element of the crime of burglary in the first degree (Penal Law § 140.30). Under such circumstances it was properly admitted *(see, People v Short,*110 AD2d 205). Lazer, J. P., Niehoff, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

DEANTE TRAMMELL DAVIS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D22-1906

September 7, 2022

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit 

Court for Pinellas County; Philip J. Federico, Judge.

Deante Trammell Davis, pro se. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

VILLANTI, KHOUZAM, and LABRIT, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2



January 5, 2005

Mr. Don H. Barden
18240 Fairway Drive
Detroit, MI 48221

Dear Mr. Barden:

This letter constitutes an amended letter agreement between The Majestic Star
Casino, LLC, an Indiana limited liability company (or its successor company)
("MSC"), and you, pursuant to which you will continue to serve as an employee of
MSC and will perform those duties generally associated with the duties of a
President and Chief Executive Officer of a company. Your duties may be changed
from time and time by MSC, but any new responsibilities or title shall be
consistent with your experience, knowledge and skills.

Effective January 1, 2005, MSC agrees to pay you compensation of $600,000
annually, payable in substantially equal weekly payments with usual and
customary payroll deductions. In addition, MSC agrees to pay, on your behalf, a
car allowance and certain premiums for life insurance policies. MSC will also
reimburse you for business travel and other related expenses.

If this letter accurately sets forth the terms of our agreement, sign and return
the enclosed copy to us. We look forward to your continued employment with our
organization and to a long and mutually beneficial relationship.

Upon execution of this letter agreement, any prior agreements, including the
letter agreement dated October 22, 2001, shall be terminated.

Sincerely,


THE MAJESTIC STAR CASINO, LLC
By:      Barden Development, Inc.
         Its:     Manager and Sole Member

By:      /s/ Michelle R. Sherman
         --------------------------------
         Michelle R. Sherman
         Its:     Vice President and CFO


Agreed to and accepted on this 5th day of January, 2005

/s/ Don H. Barden
----------------------------
Don H. Barden
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 25, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

136979 Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. JOHN SCOTT HALL and MOBILE VIDEO Stephen J. Markman, SALES & SERVICE, INC., J ustices Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 136979 COA: 276667 Washtenaw CC: 05-001063-CZ SERGEANT TIMOTHY GREENE, NORTHFIELD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHIEF CARL WATKINS, and CAPTAIN MI KE ZSENYUK, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 17, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

l1117 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 25, 2008

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS RESTATED SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND FOR THE THREE AND
NINE MONTH PERIODS THEN ENDED
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       3,781,040
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  860,833
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    622,081
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,184,444
<PP&E>                                       2,049,913
<DEPRECIATION>                                 407,752
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,208,938
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,773,387
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        4,501,223
<PREFERRED>                                      3,787
<COMMON>                                         4,294
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,728,410
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,208,938
<SALES>                                      3,018,555
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,411,349
<CGS>                                        1,453,454
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,128,344
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (163,314)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,553,681)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,553,681)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,553,681)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.37)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Steakhouse Partners, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, A. Stone Douglass President, Secretary and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, a amended; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

| Dated: December 5, 2005 | /s/ Joseph L. WulkowiczJoseph L. WulkowiczVice President and Chief Financial Officer(Serving as principal financial and accounting officer) |
|-------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350

Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer of Nicholas Financial, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended June 30, 2010 (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Peter L Vosotas                  
|Peter L. Vosotas                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: August 16,
2010
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2091 

AN ACT 

To amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act to clarify the ability 

to request consumer reports in certain cases to establish 

and enforce child support payments and awards. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2091 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Child Support Assist3 ance Act of 2015’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REQUESTS FOR CONSUMER REPORTS BY STATE OR 

5 LOCAL CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 

6 AGENCIES. 

7 Paragraph (4) of section 604(a) of the Fair Credit 

8 Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681b(a)(4)) is amended— 

9 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘or deter10 mining the appropriate level of such payments’’ and 

11 inserting ‘‘, determining the appropriate level of 

12 such payments, or enforcing a child support order, 

13 award, agreement, or judgment’’; 

14 (2) in subparagraph (B)— 

15 (A) by striking ‘‘paternity’’ and inserting 

16 ‘‘parentage’’; and 

17 (B) by adding ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

18 (3) by striking subparagraph (C); and 

19 (4) by redesignating subparagraph (D) as sub20 paragraph (C). 

Passed the House of Representatives October 6, 

2015. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2091 

AN ACT 

To amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act to clarify 

ments and awards. cases to establish and enforce child support paythe ability to request consumer reports in certain