alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021003EN.01000101.xml

| 6.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 3/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 3/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10014 — LGP/Centerbridge/Community Psychiatry)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 3/01)

On 14 December 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M10014. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M10014. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1





                   REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



To Mastering, Inc.:

We have audited the consolidated balance sheet of Mastering, Inc. (formerly 
Eagle River Interactive, Inc.), a Delaware corporation, and subsidiaries as of 
December 31, 1997, and the related consolidated statements of operations, 
stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the two years in the 
period ended December 31, 1997, not presented separately herein. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our 
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on 
our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing 
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain 
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting 
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes 
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by 
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. 
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above, not presented 
separately herein, present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated 
financial position of Mastering, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997, 
and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each 
of the two years in the period ended December 31, 1997, in conformity with 
generally accepted accounting principles.


                                                         /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP

Denver, Colorado,
January 19, 1998
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 15, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 51362]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19873]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel; NIDA Career Development and Education SEP.
    Date: October 20-21, 2021.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Drug 
Abuse, 301 North Stonestreet Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual 
Meeting).
    Contact Person: Sindhu Kizhakke Madathil, Ph.D., Scientific 
Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Drug 
Abuse, NIH, 301 North Stonestreet Avenue, MSC 6021, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 827-5702, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c0b3a9aea4a8b5eeaba9baa8a1ababa5ada1a4a1b4a8a9ac80aea9a8eea7afb6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1c6f757278746932777566747d777779717d787d687475705c727574327b736a">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.277, Drug 
Abuse Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, Scientist 
Development Awards, and Research Scientist Awards; 93.278, Drug 
Abuse National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 
93.279, Drug Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 9, 2021.
Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-19873 Filed 9-14-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Colorado River Basin Precipitation 

July 1999 - August 2000

0

25

50

75

100

125

150

175

200

Jul-99

Aug-99Sep-99

Oct-99

Nov-99

Dec-99

Jan-00

Feb-00

Mar-00

Apr-00

May-00

Jun-00

Jul-00

Aug-00

Percent of Average
List of Subsidiaries*

 

Mega Retail Ltd. (Formerly known as TheBlue Square Chain Investments & Properties Ltd.)

 

Dor Alon Energy in Israel (1988) Ltd.

 

Blue Square Real Estate Ltd.

 

Eden Briut Teva Market Ltd.

 

Bee Group Retail Ltd. (Formerly known asHamachsan Hamerkazi Kfar Hasha’ashuim Ltd.).

 

Vardinon Textile Ltd.

 

Naaman Porcelain Ltd.

 

Diners Club Israel Ltd.

 

Radio Non Stop Ltd.

 

Bee Square Real Estate Logistic CenterLtd.

 

Square Real Estate Residence Ltd.

 

Square Real Estate Tel Aviv Market Ltd.

 

Dor Alon Gas Technology Ltd.

 

Dor Alon Retail Sites Management Ltd.

 

Dor Alon Holdings (2004) Ltd.

 

Alon Cellular Ltd.

 

*All of our subsidiaries are incorporatedin Israel
Exhibit 4.4



LOGO

STEAKHOUSE PARTNERS, INC.

INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

AUTHORIZED: 25,000,000 COMMON SHARES, $.01 PAR VALUE

This Certifies That
SEE REVERSE FOR

CERTAIN DEFINITIONS CUSIP 857875207 Is The Owner Of



FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE COMMON SHARES, $.01 PAR VALUE
OF Steakhouse Partners, Inc.

transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly
authorized attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid until countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar.

In Witness Whereof, the Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers
and to be sealed with the facsimile seal of the Corporation.

Dated:

|PRESIDENT |  | SECRETARY
|--------- |  | ---------

COUNTERSIGNED: CORPORATE STOCK TRANSFER, INC.



3200 Cherry Creek Drive South, Suite 430, Denver, CO 80209



By:

Transfer
Agent and Registrar Authorized Officer



---

LOGO

Steakhouse Partners, Inc.

Corporate Stock Transfer, Inc.

Transfer Fee: As Required

The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of
this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations:

TEN COM -- as tenants in common

TEN ENT -- as tenants by the entireties

JT TEN -- as joint tenants with right of

survivorship and not as tenants

in common

UNIF GIFT MIN ACT - Custodian for

(Cust.) (Minor)

under Uniform Gifts to Minors

Act of

(State)

Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.



For value received hereby sell, assign and transfer unto



PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER



IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE



Please print or type name and address of assignee



Shares of the Common Stock
represented by the within Certificate and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint

Attorney to transfer the said stock
on the books of the within-named Corporation, with full power of substitution in the premises.

Dated 20

SIGNATURE GUARANTEED:

X

X

THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THIS CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER. THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED
BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (Banks, Stockbrokers, Savings and Loan Associations and Credit Unions) WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

RAYMOND JOE TAYLOR,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 12

- 00143

- CR

Appeal from the

355th Judicial District Court

Hood County, Texas

Cause No. CR11748

O R D E R

The Court on its own motion ORDERS the Official Court Reporter for the 355th Judicial

District Court of Hood County, Texas to prepare a supplemental report er’s record with the

O riginal State’s Exhibit 5 (DVD). The supplemental reporter’s record is due with this Court on

or before December 23, 2013. The Clerk of this Court will return the original exhibits to the

Official Court Reporter for the 355th Judici al District Court of Hood County, Texas, after final

disposition of this appeal.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 3 RD DAY OF DECEMBER , 2013.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera and Rodriguez, JJ.
#### Benway Stadium, Inc., Appellant, v Town of Volney, Respondent.

— Judgment unanimously modified, on the law, without costs, and, as modified, affirmed, in accordance with the following memorandum: Defendant rezoned from indus*944trial to residential plaintiffs 68-acre parcel improved with a racetrack and parking facility. It is conceded that use as a racetrack, which predates all zoning laws by defendant, continues to be a permitted nonconforming use. Nevertheless, plaintiff brought this declaratory judgment action seeking to have the law declared unconstitutional.

When a property owner challenges a zoning law as being confiscatory, he must establish by proof beyond a reasonable doubt that, "with respect to the whole tract”, a reasonable return from the property may not be obtained from any use permitted by the existing ordinance, including "a nonconforming use pre-existing the zoning classification” *(Northern Westchester Professional Park Assoc. v Town of Bedford,*60 NY2d 492, 503). Plaintiffs proof that its parcel, if undeveloped, would have suffered a tenfold decrease in value misses the mark. Plaintiff must establish that permitted uses, including nonconforming uses, destroy the economic value of the property. No such evidence was presented, and the court, therefore, properly concluded that plaintiff failed to meet its burden.

The court erred, however, by dismissing the complaint. In a declaratory judgment action, the proper disposition is to make a declaration *(Hirsch v Lindor Realty Corp.,*63 NY2d 878, 881). Accordingly, we declare the challenged ordinance to be constitutional and otherwise affirm the judgment. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Oswego County, Inglehart, J. — declaratory judgment.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Green, Pine and Lawton, JJ.
#### UNITED STATES v. Private (E-2) Clifford W. KILLSCROW, [ XXX-XX-XXXX ], U. S. Army, U. S. Army Personnel Control Facility, U. S. Army Garrison, Fort Carson, Colorado.

SPCM 10902.

U. S. Army Court of Military Review.

29 Aug. 1975.

*616Appellate counsel for the Accused: CPT David A. Shaw, JAGC; CPT Albert T. Berry, JAGC; LTC James Kucera, JAGC; COL Victor A. De Fiori, JAGC.

Appellate counsel for the United States: CPT Robert L. Powell, JAGC; CPT Gary F. Thorne, JAGC; LTC Donald W. Hansen, JAGC.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

The accused was convicted upon his plea of guilty before a special court-martial of absence without leave. The approved sentence appears above.

A verbatim record of trial which has been properly authenticated is required in a general court-martial case or a special court-martial which can adjudge a bad-conduct discharge when the sentence adjudged exceeds that which can be adjudged by a regular special court-martial. (Paras. 82b, 82f, and 83a, Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1969 (Revised edition)). As the sentence adjudged in this case exceeded the jurisdictional limitations of a regular special court-martial, it was error not to prepare a properly authenticated verbatim record.

This Court does not decide at this time whether a video tape can be construed to be a verbatim record. We do hold the record before us is inadequate for appellate review due to the lack of implementing regulations which include a method to confirm the validity of the video tapes to the authentication process. In addition, a procedure is required to authorize a person (reporter as defined in para. 49, MCM, 1969, (Rev.)) to be sworn and to have performed the preparation and control of the tapes during and after trial. Furthermore, adequate procedures for compliance with the provision of Article 54c, Uniform Code of Military Justice, must be developed.

A viewing of these tapes which showed the presence of a sworn court reporter indicates to this Court the possibility that a properly authenticated verbatim record can still be made available in this case.

Accordingly, the action of the convening authority, dated 26 November 1974, is hereby set aside. The record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General for a new review and action by the same staff judge advocate and convening authority.

CARNE, MITCHELL and MOUNTS, Appellate Military Judges, concur.
# L_2014106EN.01004501.xml

| 9.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 106/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 106/45

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision 2010/286/EU of 19 January 2010 on the existence of an excessive deficit in Italy

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 125 of 21 May 2010
  )

In the Contents page and on page 40 in the title:

for:

‘Council Decision of 19 January 2010 on the existence of an excessive deficit in Italy (2010/286/EU)’,

read:

‘Council Decision of 2 December 2009 on the existence of an excessive deficit in Italy (2010/286/EU)’;

On page 41, in the concluding formula:

for:

‘Done at Brussels, 19 January 2010.

For the Council

The President

E. SALGADO
  ’,

read:

‘Done at Brussels, 2 December 2009.

For the Council

The President

A. BORG
  ’.

---
#### In the Matter of Sinclair Haberman et al., Appellants, v Zoning Board of Appeals of City of Long Beach et al., Respondents.

Submitted February 20, 2007;

decided March 29, 2007

Motion by the New York State Builders Association, Inc. for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the motion for leave to appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00512-CR

Crae Robert Pease, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 6 OF TRAVIS COUNTY,

NO. C-1-CR-13-220763, HONORABLE BOB PERKINS, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R A N D M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

The reporter’s record was due to be filed in this Court on October 13, 2014. To date,

the reporter’s record has not been filed. According to the appellant, he has not made payment

arrangements for the reporter’s record because he lacks sufficient resources to pay for it. Although

appellant filed an affidavit of indigency in the trial court within the time for perfecting his appeal,

no finding of indigency has been made. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.2.

To avoid further delays and protect the rights of the parties, the appeal is abated and

the trial court is instructed to determine, following a hearing if necessary, whether appellant is

presently indigent. See id. If it finds that the appellant cannot pay or give security for the appellate

record, it shall order the preparation of the reporter’s record at no cost to appellant. See id. A

supplemental clerk’s record including copies of all findings, conclusions, order, and a transcription

of any hearing that is held shall be tendered for filing in this Court no later than January 30, 2015.
It is so ordered this 19th day of December 2014.

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Field

Abated and Remanded

Filed: December 19, 2014

Do Not Publish

2
#### SCHMALACHER, Appellant, v. STOLZ, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

September, 1896.)

Action by Bernard Schmalacher against George Stolz.

Wm. H. Knox, for appellant.

Bailey & Perkins, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed upon argument.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 25, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136979 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. JOHN SCOTT HALL and MOBILE VIDEO Stephen J. Markman, 

SALES & SERVICE, INC., Justices 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v SC: 136979 

 COA: 276667 

Washtenaw CC: 05-001063-CZ 

SERGEANT TIMOTHY GREENE, 

NORTHFIELD TOWNSHIP POLICE 

DEPARTMENT, CHIEF CARL WATKINS, 

and CAPTAIN MIKE ZSENYUK, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 17, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l1117 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 25, 2008 

 Clerk
**UN PUBLISHED**  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 7461** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. RYAN O’NEIL LANSDOWNE , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Easte rn District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. T. S. Ellis , III , Senior District Judge. ( 1:00

- cr - 00185

- TSE

- 1; 1:11

- cv - 00112

- TSE )

Submitted : March 15, 2012 Decided: March 20, 2012

Before WILKINSON and MOTZ , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Ju dge.
Affirmed in part ; dismissed in part by un published per curiam opinion
. Ryan O’Neil Lansdowne, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Ryan O’Neil Lansdowne seeks to appeal the district court’s order s (1) denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) and denying relief on his 28
U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2011 ) m otion ; and (2) denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the district court’s denial of Lansdowne’s § 3582(c)(2) motion and his request for reconsideration and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders i n part for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lansdowne , Nos. 1:00

- cr - 00185

- TSE

- 1; 1:11

- cv - 00112

- TSE (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 4, 2011 & entered Aug. 5, 2011; filed Nov. 8, 2011 & entered Nov. 9, 2011). To the extent that the district c ourt’s orders address Lansdowne’s request for § 2255 relief, the orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district cou rt’s assessment of the constitutional claims is3 debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demons trate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Lansdowne has no t made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Lansdowne’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal in part . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials befo re the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED IN PART ; DISMISSED IN PART
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2117 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the limitation on 

the amount of distilled spirits taxes covered over to the Virgin Islands 

and Puerto Rico. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 29, 2015 

Ms. PLASKETT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

the limitation on the amount of distilled spirits taxes 

covered over to the Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF LIMITATION ON COVER OVER OF 

4 DISTILLED SPIRITS TAXES TO VIRGIN IS5 LANDS AND PUERTO RICO. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 7652 of the Internal Rev7 enue Code of 1986 is amended by striking subsection (f) 

8 and by redesignating subsections (g) and (h) as sub9 sections (f) and (g), respectively. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2117 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to distilled spirits brought into the 

3 United States after December 31, 2015. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS