alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2


                        Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-59679) pertaining to the 1996 Equity Participation Plan of Rental
Service Corporation, which incorporates by reference the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-22403); the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-29579)
pertaining to the First Amended and Restated Employee Qualified Stock Purchase
Plan of Rental Service Corporation; and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-18637) pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plan for Key Employees of Acme
Acquisition Holdings Corp. of our report dated February 10, 1999 with respect to
the consolidated financial statements of Rental Service Corporation included in
Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report and Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 1998.


                                         /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Phoenix, Arizona
May 21, 1999
Exhibit 32.1



PERICOM SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED



PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this quarterly report of Pericom Semiconductor Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 25, 2004 (the
Report), I, Alex C. Hui, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.



November 4, 2004



By:

/s/ Alex C. HuiAlex C. HuiChief Executive OfficerPericom Semiconductor Corporation
(November 17, 1986)

#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Amos Whitted, Petitioner, v E. W. Jones, as Superintendent of Great Meadow Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Main, Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration statement on FormS-3 (No. 333-85808), the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-130978), the Registrationstatement on Form S-8 (No. 333-75792), and the Registration statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-75788)of Access Plans of our report dated April 11, 2005, except forNote 18 which is as of March 30,2007 relating to the 2004 consolidated financial statements of operations, stockholders’ equity andcash flows which appear in this Form 10-K./s/ BDO Seidman, LLPDallas, Texas
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-62-2021]

Lilly del Caribe, Inc., submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board (the Board) for its facility in Carolina, Puerto Rico within Subzone 7K. The notification conforming to the requirements of the Board's regulations (15 CFR 400.22) was received on September 8, 2021.      ( print page 51654)    

Pursuant to 15 CFR 400.14(b), FTZ production activity would be limited to the specific foreign-status material described in the submitted notification (summarized below) and subsequently authorized by the Board. The benefits that may stem from conducting production activity under FTZ procedures are explained in the background section of the Board's website—accessible via *www.trade.gov/​ftz.* The proposed material would be added to the production authority that the Board previously approved for the operation, as reflected on the Board's website.

The proposed foreign-status material is fluoxetine hydrochloride (duty rate 6.5%).

Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions shall be addressed to the Board's Executive Secretary and sent to: *ftz@trade.gov.* The closing period for their receipt is October 26, 2021.

A copy of the notification will be available for public inspection in the “Online FTZ Information System” section of the Board's website.

For further information, contact Christopher Wedderburn at *Chris.Wedderburn@trade.gov.*

Dated: September 10, 2021.

Elizabeth Whiteman,

Acting Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2021-20000 Filed 9-15-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
THEODORE EUGENE WRIGHT

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF I F FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 2137

Opinion filed June 8, 2016.

Petition for Writ of Prohibition

-- Original Jurisdiction

.

Theodore Eugene Wright, pro se , Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Th e petition for writ of prohibition is denied.

LEWIS, BILBREY, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6341
WILLIAM M. BAILEY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus THOMAS R. CORCORAN; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA94-3620-WMN) Submitted: August 22, 1996 Decided: September 10, 1996 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William M. Bailey, Appellant Pro Se. Ann Norman Bossee, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewedthe record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bailey v. Corcoran , No. CA-94-3620-WMN (D. Md. Feb. 29, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. The motion for appointment of counsel is denied.

AFFIRMED
[ARTICLE] 5
[LEGEND]

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE BALANCE SHEET FOR
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.


<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   12-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-1997
[PERIOD-END]                               DEC-31-1997
[CASH]                                          80,769
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                1,339,046
[ALLOWANCES]                                     1,724
[INVENTORY]                                      8,707
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                             1,567,827
[PP&E]                                       3,225,959
[DEPRECIATION]                               1,763,384
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                               5,804,153
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                        1,899,193
[BONDS]                                              0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[COMMON]                                         2,730
[OTHER-SE]                                   2,885,206
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                 5,804,153
[SALES]                                              0
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                             9,022,842
[CGS]                                                0
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                        0
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                            11,922,206
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                              73,581
[INCOME-PRETAX]                            (2,972,945)
[INCOME-TAX]                               (1,112,127)
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                                  0
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                               (1,860,818)
[EPS-PRIMARY]                                    (.68)
[EPS-DILUTED]                                        0
</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 8, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-60088

Summary Calendar

 

MARIA DEL CARMEN HEREDIA-CAMINO,

Petitioner,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

--------------------

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A78-874-208

--------------------

Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Maria Del Carmen Heredia-Camino petitions this court for

review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA)

allegedly denying her request for an extension of time to file an

appeal brief to appeal the Immigration Judge’s decision denying

her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and

protection under Convention Against Torture. Heredia-Camino’s

argument is misplaced; the BIA granted her motion for an
No. 03-60088

-2-

extension of time. The BIA rejected her brief because it was not

served on the INS office of record. 

To the extent she alleges a due process violation based on

the rejection of her brief, she has failed to demonstrate

substantial prejudice. Anwar v. INS, 116 F.3d 140, 145 (5th Cir.

1997). Heredia-Camino has not shown that she was unable or

unwilling to return “‘because of persecution or a well-founded

fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality,

membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.’” 

See Jukic v. INS, 40 F.3d 747, 749 (5th Cir. 1994)(quoting 8

U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42)(A));

PETITION DENIED.
#### Gisele Ambroise, Appellant, v New York City Transit Authority, Respondent.

Submitted November 13, 2006;

decided January 9, 2007

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion *827of the Appellate Division order that denied appellant’s motion to renew, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
Listen

# Advisory Committee Member Resources

## Documents for Current Members

New Member Orientation

Committee Officers

Monday.com Set Up Guide

Electronic Funds Transfer Form

Tips on Writing an Op-Ed

USCCR Citation Reference Guide

### Stage Gate Cheat Sheets

(1) Concept

(2) Proposal

(3) Implementation

(4) Report

(5) Post-Report

### Sample Documents

In-Person Briefing Agenda

Virtual Briefing Agenda

Panelist Invitation

Project Proposal

Policy Brief

Panel Transcript

Panel Presentation Slides
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-1893

MAI CHAPPEL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

XUAN NGUYEN; QUI TRINH,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, Chief District Judge. (2:22-cv-00173-MSD-LRL)

Submitted: December 20, 2022 Decided: December 22, 2022

Before NIEMEYER and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mai Chappel, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1893 Doc: 11 Filed: 12/22/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Mai Chappel appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil complaint for 

lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we modify the district court’s dismissal order, Chappel v. Nguyen, 

No. 2:22-cv-00173-MSD-LRL (E.D. Va. Aug. 8, 2022), to reflect that the dismissal is 

without prejudice, and we affirm the dismissal as modified. See 28 U.S.C. § 2106; Ali v. 

Hogan, 26 F.4th 587, 600 (4th Cir. 2022) (explaining that dismissal for lack of subject 

matter jurisdiction must be without prejudice). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court 

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1893 Doc: 11 Filed: 12/22/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Ave Reservoir Elevation                    
csv

      Pool Elevation                    
csv

#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Ave Reservoir Elevation                    
json

      Pool Elevation                    
json
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7011

RONNIE CLEARACE HEADEN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Tommy E. Miller, Magistrate Judge.

(CA-00-222-2)

Submitted: October 12, 2000 Decided: October 20, 2000

Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronnie Clearace Headen, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Bain Smith,

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
1 The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(c) (West 1993 & Supp. 2000).

2 Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on

July 10, 2000, the district court’s records show that it was

entered on the docket sheet on July 11, 2000. Pursuant to Rules 58

and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date

that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the

effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v.

Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Ronnie Clearace Headen seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s1

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Headen v. Angelone, No.

CA-00-2222-2 (E.D. Va. July 11, 2000).2 We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 222 

To prohibit the Export-Import Bank of the United States from providing 

financial support for certain high carbon intensity energy projects. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 8, 2015 

Mr. HUFFMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Export-Import Bank of the United States 

from providing financial support for certain high carbon 

intensity energy projects. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON EXPORT-IMPORT BANK SUP4 PORT FOR CERTAIN HIGH CARBON INTEN5 SITY ENERGY PROJECTS. 

6 Section 2(b) of the Export-Import Bank Act of 1945 

7 (12 U.S.C. 635(b)) is amended by adding at the end the 

8 following: 

9 ‘‘(14) PROHIBITION ON SUPPORT FOR CERTAIN

10 HIGH CARBON INTENSITY ENERGY PROJECTS.— 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 222 IH

1 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Bank shall not guar2 antee, insure, extend credit, or participate in the ex3 tension of credit in connection with the purchase or 

4 sale of any good or service for a high carbon inten5 sity project. 

6 ‘‘(B) HIGH CARBON INTENSITY PROJECT DE7 FINED.—In subparagraph (A), the term ‘high car8 bon intensity project’ means a project that— 

9 ‘‘(i) is designed to generate electricity; and 

10 ‘‘(ii) if completed, would produce at least 

11 500 grams of carbon dioxide per kilowatt-hour 

12 of electricity generated by the project.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 173 (Friday, September 10, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50789-50790]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19503]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Tax Forms and 
Publications Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Tax Forms and 
Publications Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy 
Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving

[[Page 50790]]

customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, October 14, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred Smith at 1-888-912-1227 or (202) 
317-3087.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Tax Forms and 
Publications Project Committee will be held Thursday, October 14, 2021 
at 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments 
or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and 
structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be 
made with Fred Smith. For more information please contact Fred Smith at 
1-888-912-1227 or (202) 317-3087, or write TAP Office, 1111 
Constitution Ave. NW, Room 1509, Washington, DC 20224 or contact us at 
the website: http://www.improveirs.org.

    Dated: September 3, 2021.
Kevin Brown,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2021-19503 Filed 9-9-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
ANIMAS RIVER AT PENNY LANE NEAR FLORA VISTA, NMLatitude: 36.784Longitude: -108.102Elevation: 5455

ANIMAS RIVER AT PENNY LANE NEAR FLORA VISTA, NM

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Beartown Site Page...



Beartown

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Cascade Site Page...



Cascade

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Cascade #2 Site Page...



Cascade #2

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Idarado Site Page...



Idarado

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Mineral Creek Site Page...



Mineral Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Molas Lake Site Page...



Molas Lake

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Red Mountain Pass Site Page...



Red Mountain Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Scotch Creek Site Page...



Scotch Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Spud Mountain Site Page...



Spud Mountain

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Stump Lakes Site Page...



Stump Lakes

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Columbus Basin Site Page...



Columbus Basin
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7798

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. JERMAINE JERRELL SIMS, a/k/a Justice, a/k/a Jus, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (3:98-cr-00045-CMH-1)

Submitted: December 11, 2008 Decided: December 18, 2008

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jermaine Jerrell Sims, Appellant Pro Se. Nicholas Stephan Altimari, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, Kenneth E. Melson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jermaine Jerrell Sims appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006), and denying reconsideration. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Sims , No. 3:98-cr-00045-CMH-1 (E.D. Va. April 10 & May 20, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          21,538
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,538
<PP&E>                                         329,913
<DEPRECIATION>                                 329,913
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 168,966
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,219,645
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,062,679)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   168,966
<SALES>                                         63,060
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                63,060
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  777,304
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              79,261
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (793,505)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (793,505)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (793,505)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.66)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.66)


</TABLE>