51676 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 177 / Thursday, September 16, 2021 / Notices 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1133 

(Rescission)] 

Certain Unmanned Aerial Vehicles and 

Components Thereof; Commission 

Determination To Institute a 

Rescission Proceeding and Rescind 

Permanently a Limited Exclusion Order 

and Cease and Desist Orders; 

Termination of Rescission Proceeding 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) has 

determined to institute a rescission 

proceeding and rescind the remedial 

orders issued in the underlying 

investigation. This rescission 

proceeding is hereby terminated. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl 

P. Bretscher, Esq., Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–2382. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket system 

(‘‘EDIS’’) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For 

help accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal, telephone 

(202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on October 2, 2018, based on a 

complaint filed by Autel Robotics USA, 

Inc. (‘‘Autel’’) of Bothell, Washington. 

83 FR 49575–76 (Oct. 2, 2018). The 

complaint accuses respondents of 

violating 19 U.S.C. 1337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘Section 

337’’) by importing into the United 

States, selling for importation, or selling 

in the United States after importation 

certain unmanned aerial vehicles 

(‘‘UAVs’’) and components thereof that 

infringe one or more of the asserted 

claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,260,184 

(‘‘the ’184 patent’’); 7,979,174 (‘‘the ’174 

patent’’); and 10,044,013 (‘‘the ’013 

patent’’). Id. The complaint also alleges 

the existence of a domestic industry. Id. 

The notice of investigation named the 

following respondents: SZ DJI 

Technology Co. Ltd. of Shenzhen, 

China; DJI Europe B.V. of Barendrecht, 

Netherlands; DJI Technology Inc. of 

Burbank, California; iFlight Technology 

Co., Ltd. (‘‘iFlight’’) of Hong Kong; DJI 

Baiwang Technology Co. Ltd. of 

Shenzhen, China; DJI Research LLC of 

Palo Alto, California; DJI Service LLC 

(‘‘DJI Service’’) of Cerritos, California; 

and DJI Creative Studio LLC of Burbank, 

California (collectively, ‘‘DJI’’). Id. The 

Office of Unfair Import Investigations is 

not a party to this investigation. Id. 

On March 2, 2020, the presiding Chief 

Administrative Law Judge (‘‘CALJ’’) 

issued a combined Initial Determination 

on Violation of Section 337 (‘‘ID’’) and 

Recommended Determination (‘‘RD’’) on 

Remedy and Bonding, finding a 

violation of Section 337 by way of 

infringement of the ’184 patent but no 

violation with respect to the ’174 patent 

or ’013 patent. 

On May 29, 2020, while the parties’ 

petitions for review were still pending 

before the Commission, respondents’ 

counsel filed a letter with the 

Commission attaching four recent Final 

Written Decisions by the Patent Trial 

and Appeal Board (‘‘PTAB’’) of the U.S. 

Patent and Trademark Office, finding 

the challenged claims of the ’184, ’174, 

and ’013 patents, including the claims 

asserted in this investigation, to be 

unpatentable. See, e.g., SZ DJI 

Technology Co. v. Autel Robotics USA 

LLC, Case IPR2019–00343, Final Written 

Decision Finding All Challenged Claims 

Unpatentable (PTAB May 21, 2020), on 

appeal sub. nom., Autel Robotics USA 

LLC v. SZ DJI Technology Co., Appeal 

No. 20–1987 (Fed. Cir.) (‘‘Appeal No. 

20–1987’’). 

On June 8, 2020, the Commission 

issued a notice stating that it had 

determined to partially review certain 

findings relating to the ’184 patent, 

including the impact, if any, of the 

PTAB’s Final Written Decision finding 

the ’184 patent claims unpatentable. 

Comm’n Notice at 2–3 (June 9, 2020). 

The Commission determined not to 

review the ID’s findings that there is no 

violation with respect to the ’174 patent 

or’013 patent. Id. 

On August 20, 2020, the Commission 

affirmed that DJI violated Section 337 by 

way of infringing claims 1 and 2 of the 

’184 patent. Comm’n Notice at 3 (Aug. 

20, 2020) (‘‘Comm’n Notice’’); Comm’n 

Op. at 8–21 (Aug. 20, 2020) (‘‘Comm’n 

Op.’’). Having found a violation of 

Section 337, the Commission 

determined that the appropriate remedy 

is: (a) A limited exclusion order 

prohibiting the importation of UAVs 

and components thereof that are 

covered by claims 1 or 2 of the ’184 

patent; (b) cease and desist orders 

against respondents iFlight and DJI 

Service; and (c) set a bond in the 

amount of 11.5 percent of the entered 

value of the excluded products 

imported during the period of 

Presidential review (19 U.S.C. 1337(j)). 

See Comm’n Notice at 3; Comm’n Op. 

at 26–34. The Commission determined 

that the public interest factors 

enumerated in Section 337(d)(1) and 

(f)(1) do not preclude issuance of the 

limited exclusion order or cease and 

desist orders. Id. The Commission, 

however, determined to suspend 

enforcement of the limited exclusion 

order, cease and desist orders, and bond 

provision pending final resolution of the 

PTAB’s Final Written Decision 

regarding the ’184 patent. See Comm’n 

Notice at 4; Comm’n Op. at 35–38. 

On October 16, 2020, Autel filed a 

notice of appeal of the Commission’s 

final determination, including its 

determination to suspend enforcement 

of its remedial orders. See Robotics 

USA, LLC v. ITC, Appeal No. 21–1082 

(‘‘Appeal No. 21–1082’’). On November 

25, 2020, DJI filed a notice of a crossappeal of the Commission’s final 

determination. See SZ DJI Technology 

Co. Ltd. v. ITC, Appeal No. 21–1363 

(‘‘Appeal No. 21–1363’’). On December 

16, 2020, the Federal Circuit 

consolidated the appeals, designating 

Appeal No. 21–1082 as the lead case. 

On August 16, 2021, Autel and DJI 

filed a joint motion to voluntarily 

dismiss their appeal and cross-appeal. 

See Autel Robotics USA LLC v. Int’l 

Trade Comm’n LLC, Appeal Nos. 2021– 

1082, –1363, Joint Stipulation to 

Dismiss Appeals (Aug. 16, 2021). The 

Federal Circuit granted the motion and 

dismissed the appeals the following 

day. See Autel Robotics USA LLC v. Int’l 

Trade Comm’n, Appeal Nos. 21–1082, 

–1363, Order (Fed. Cir. Aug. 17, 2021). 

On August 16, 2021, Autel and DJI 

filed a Joint Petition to Rescind the 

Limited Exclusion Order and Cease and 

Desist Orders (‘‘Joint Petition’’) that the 

Commission issued in this investigation, 

pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337(k) and 

Commission Rule 210.76(a) (19 CFR 

210.76(a)). The parties filed both 

confidential and public versions of the 

settlement agreements. 

Upon consideration of the parties’ 

joint petition, the Commission has 

determined that the petition complies 

with Commission rules, see 19 CFR 

210.76(a)(3), and that there are no 

extraordinary reasons to deny rescission 

of the remedial orders. Accordingly, the 

Commission has determined to institute 

a rescission proceeding and to 

permanently rescind the LEO and the 

CDOs. This rescission proceeding is 

hereby terminated. 

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 177 / Thursday, September 16, 2021 / Notices 51677 

The Commission voted to approve 

these determinations on September 10, 

2021. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in Section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 

210). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: September 10, 2021. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2021–19977 Filed 9–15–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

[OMB Number 1122–0006] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Proposed eCollection 

Requested; Extension of a Currently 

Approved Collection 

AGENCY: Office on Violence Against 

Women, Department of Justice. 

ACTION: 30-Day notice. 

SUMMARY: The Office on Violence 

Against Women (OVW), Department of 

Justice, will be submitting the following 

information collection request to the 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for review and approval in 

accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995. 

DATES: Comments are encouraged and 

will be accepted for 30 days until 

October 18, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed 

information collection should be sent 

within 30 days of publication of this 

notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/ 

PRAMain. Find this particular 

information collection by selecting 

‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open 

for Public Comments’’ or by using the 

search function. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written 

comments and suggestions from the 

public and affected agencies concerning 

the proposed collection of information 

are encouraged. Your comments should 

address one or more of the following 

four points: 

(1) Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

(2) evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

(4) Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Overview of This Information 

Collection 

(1) Type of Information Collection: 

Extension of currently approved 

collection. 

(2) Title of the Form/Collection: 

Semiannual Progress Report for the 

Improving Criminal Justice Responses to 

Sexual Assault, Domestic Violence, 

Dating Violence, and Stalking Grant 

Program. 

(3) Agency form number, if any, and 

the applicable component of the 

Department of Justice sponsoring the 

collection: Form Number: 1122–0006. 

U.S. Department of Justice, Office on 

Violence Against Women. 

(4) Affected public who will be asked 

or required to respond, as well as a brief 

abstract: The affected public includes 

200 grantees from the Improving 

Criminal Justice Responses to Sexual 

Assault, Domestic Violence, Dating 

Violence, and Stalking Grant Program 

(ICJR Program) (also known as Grants to 

Encourage Arrest Policies and 

Enforcement of Protection Orders) 

which encourages state, local, and tribal 

governments and state, local, and tribal 

courts to treat domestic violence, dating 

violence, sexual assault, and stalking as 

serious violations of criminal law 

requiring the coordinated involvement 

of the entire criminal justice system. 

Eligible applicants are states and 

territories, units of local government, 

Indian tribal governments, coalitions, 

victim service providers and state, local, 

tribal, and territorial courts. 

(5) An estimate of the total number of 

respondents and the amount of time 

estimated for an average respondent to 

respond/reply: It is estimated that it will 

take the approximately 200 respondents 

(ICJR Program grantees) approximately 

one hour to complete a semi-annual 

progress report. The semi-annual 

progress report is divided into sections 

that pertain to the different types of 

activities in which grantees may engage. 

An ICJR Program grantee will only be 

required to complete the sections of the 

form that pertain to its own specific 

activities (victim services, law 

enforcement, training, etc.). 

(6) An estimate of the total public 

burden (in hours) associated with the 

collection: The total annual hour burden 

to complete the data collection forms is 

400 hours, that is 200 grantees 

completing a form twice a year with an 

estimated completion time for the form 

being one hour. 

If additional information is required 

contact: Melody Braswell, Deputy 

Clearance Officer, United States 

Department of Justice, Justice 

Management Division, Policy and 

Planning Staff, Two Constitution 

Square, 145 N Street NE, 3E, 405B, 

Washington, DC 20530. 

Dated: September 13, 2021. 

Melody Braswell, 

Department Clearance Officer, PRA, U.S. 

Department of Justice. 

[FR Doc. 2021–20029 Filed 9–15–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–FX–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

[OMB Number 1105–0008] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Proposed eCollection 

eComments Requested; Extension of a 

Currently Approved Collection; Claim 

for Damage, Injury, or Death 

AGENCY: Civil Division, Department of 

Justice. 

ACTION: 30-Day notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Justice 

(DOJ), Civil Division, will be submitting 

the following information collection 

request to the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) for review and approval 

in accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995. 

DATES: Comments are encouraged and 

will be accepted for 30 days until 

October 18, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed 

information collection should be sent 

within 30 days of publication of this 

notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/ 

PRAMain. Find this particular 

information collection by selecting 

‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open 

for Public Comments’’ or by using the 

search function. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written 

comments and suggestions from the 

public and affected agencies concerning 

the proposed collection of information 

are encouraged. Your comments should 

address one or more of the following 

four points: