alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PAGE 1 – ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

SUSAN ORTEGA,

Plaintiff,

v.

BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES, INC., et 

al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:16-cv-0368-SU

ORDER

Michael H. Simon, District Judge.

United States Magistrate Judge Patricia Sullivan issued Findings and Recommendation in 

this case on August 19, 2016. ECF 13. Judge Sullivan recommended that Defendants’ motion to 

compel arbitration and stay this case pending completion of arbitration be granted. No party has 

filed objections.

Under the Federal Magistrates Act (“Act”), the court may “accept, reject, or modify, in 

whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(1). If a party files objections to a magistrate’s findings and recommendations, “the court 

shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings 

or recommendations to which objection is made.” Id.; Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3).

Case 2:16-cv-00368-SU Document 15 Filed 09/19/16 Page 1 of 2
PAGE 2 – ORDER

If no party objects, the Act does not prescribe any standard of review. See Thomas v. Arn, 

474 U.S. 140, 152 (1985) (“There is no indication that Congress, in enacting [the Act], intended 

to require a district judge to review a magistrate’s report to which no objections are filed.”); 

United States. v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (holding that the 

court must review de novo magistrate’s findings and recommendations if objection is made, “but 

not otherwise”). 

Although review is not required in the absence of objections, the Act “does not preclude 

further review by the district judge[] sua sponte . . . under a de novo or any other standard.” 

Thomas, 474 U.S. at 154. Indeed, the Advisory Committee Notes to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) 

recommend that “[w]hen no timely objection is filed,” the court review the magistrate’s findings 

and recommendations for “clear error on the face of the record.”

No party having made objections, this Court follows the recommendation of the Advisory 

Committee and reviews Judge Sullivan’s Findings and Recommendation for clear error on the 

face of the record. No such error is apparent. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS Judge Sullivan’s 

Findings and Recommendation, ECF 13. Defendants’ motion to compel arbitration and stay

these proceedings (ECF 5) is GRANTED. This case is stayed pending the completion of 

arbitration.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 19th day of September, 2016.

/s/ Michael H. Simon

Michael H. Simon

United States District Judge

Case 2:16-cv-00368-SU Document 15 Filed 09/19/16 Page 2 of 2
datetime,flow volume2015-05-20,567.27273
EXHIBIT 99.4
                                                                    ------------



               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                 ---------------------------------------------



In connection with the Annual Report of Canadian Natural Resources Limited (the
"Company") on Form 40-F for the period ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report") to
which this certificate is an exhibit, I, Douglas A. Proll, Senior Vice
President, Finance of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


Date:  April 15, 2003
                                        /s/ Douglas A. Proll
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name:  Douglas A. Proll
                                        Title:  Senior Vice President, Finance



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Canadian Natural Resources Limited and will be retained by Canadian
Natural Resources Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #17163 and #17164; New York Disaster Number NY-00206]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of New York dated 09/09/2021. *Incident:* Severe Storms and Flooding. *Incident Period:* 07/16/2021 through 07/19/2021.
 DATES: Issued on 09/09/2021. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:* 11/08/2021. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:* 06/09/2022.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:* Otsego. *Contiguous Counties:* New York: Chenango, Delaware, Herkimer, Madison, Montgomery, Oneida, Schoharie. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
3.250Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.625Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere
5.760Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.880( print page 51432)Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.000Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.000*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.880Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 17163 6 and for economic injury is 17164 0. The State which received an EIDL Declaration # is New York. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Isabella Guzman, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2021-19883 Filed 9-14-21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
EXHIBIT 31.1

      I, Antonio Milici, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of GeneThera, Inc.

      2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

      4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

            a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

            b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
this report (the Evaluation Date"); and

            c) presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

      5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

            a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

            b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

      6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


         Date: March 31, 2005

         By: /s/ Antonio Milici
         ----------------------
         Antonio Milici, M.D., Ph.D., President
Hennion & Walsh, Inc. 487


Exhibit 4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


240 Greenwich
Street, 22W Floor, New York, NY 10286


 


 


 


June 15, 2021


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


SmartTrust 521 (the “Fund”)


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York Mellon is acting as trustee for the Fund, consisting
of the unit investment trust (the “Trust”) included in the Registration Statement relating to the Fund. We enclosed
a list of the securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our evaluation of such
securities as of close of business on June 14, 2021, in accordance with the valuation method set forth in the applicable Standard Terms
and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing the evaluations
of the Trust securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-254396) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect
to the registration of the sale of the Units of the Trust and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO


Gerardo Cipriano


Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         415,112
<SECURITIES>                                     1,414
<RECEIVABLES>                                  638,702
<ALLOWANCES>                                    51,682
<INVENTORY>                                     39,209
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,213,801
<PP&E>                                      10,110,921
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,169,483
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,274,293
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,904,375
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        32,933
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,673,510
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,274,293
<SALES>                                        461,953
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,395,719
<CGS>                                          265,679
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  265,679
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,271,892
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (145)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             192,443
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (275,736)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (275,736)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (275,736)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.08)



</TABLE>
**Exhibit 10.13.3**

 

**Amendment No. 11 (the “Amendment”) ToEmployment Agreement (the “Employment Agreement”) betweenAndrew Hobson (“Employee”) and Univision Management Co. (“Company”)**

 

Employee and Companyagree to amend the Employment Agreement as follows:

 

1.                                       **Term**.  The Term of the Employment Agreement isextended through December 31, 2008, unless earlier terminated inaccordance with the provisions of the Employment Agreement.

 

2.                                       **Salary**.  The annual Base Salary rate will be EightHundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($850,000) for the annual period of the Termfrom January 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006; Eight Hundred FiftyThousand Dollars ($850,000) for the annual period of the Term from January 1,2007 through December 31, 2007; and Eight Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars($850,000) for the annual period of the Term from January 1, 2008 through December 31,2008.

 

3.                                       **Effective Date of Amendment**.  Upon execution by Employee and Company, thisAmendment will become effective as of December 31, 2005.

 

4.                                       **Other**.  Except as provided in this Amendment, allother terms and conditions in the Employment Agreement will remain in fullforce and effect, and the Employment Agreement, as amended hereby, is ratifiedand confirmed.

 
| ** **         | **UNIVISION  MANAGEMENT CO.** |
|--------------------|-------------------------------|
|               |                          |
|               |                          |
|               | By:                           | /s/ PETER H.  LORI |   |
|               |                          | Peter H. Lori |
|               |                          | Assistant  Treasurer and Assistant Secretary |
|               |                          |   |
| /s/ ANDREW  HOBSON |                          |
| Andrew Hobson      |                          |
|                    |                               |  |  |  |

 

----
# Patent

## Title
Insulating valance

## Abstract

While the particular embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that changes and modifications may be made without departing from the invention in its broader aspects and, therefore, the aim in the appended claims is to cover all changes and modifications as fall within the true spirit and scope of this invention.

## Background
## Claims

1. Apparatus for inflating balloons comprising, in combination: an inflatable balloon having a neck portion, a check valve assembly including a tubular member having an annular valve seat at one end, a radially extending integral flange on said tubular member adjacent said valve seat, a portion of the balloon neck encompassing said tubular member and said flange to prevent separation of said balloon neck and said tubular member, a circular imperforate resilient disk within the neck of the balloon engageable with said annular seat to prevent escape of gas from the interior of the balloon through the interior of said tubular member, apertured means carried on said flange for supporting said disk in position said opertured means having at least one operture therethrough through which gas may flow into said balloon when said disk is moved from its seat, a stationary filler element having a rounded imperforate nose portion, said nose portion being received within the interior of said tubular portion upon relative telescopic movement of said tubular member with respect to said filler element, said tubular member having an end shoulder remote from said annular seat engaging an external stop shoulder formed on said filter element, said filter element having a longitudinal passage therein extending beyond said stop shoulder but terminating short of said rounded nose portion, said filter element having a lateral port located between said rounded nose portion and said external stop shoulder, said rounded nose portion contacting said resilient disk to move it away from said annular seat when the end shoulder of said tubular member engages the external stop shoulder on said filler element, whereby gas supplied to said longitudinal passage may pass through the port and into an annular space between the tubular member and the filler element and then into the neck of the balloon through said apertured support means.

2. The combination set forth in claim 1 including timer controlled means for supplying gas under pressure to said longitudinal passageway.
Skip to main content

Privacy Policy•Site map

# Courtroom Technology

Please review the information below, if you have any questions regarding the use of courtroom technology, please contact the court’s IT Help Desk at (202) 357-6404.  Training can also be arranged if required.

All currently installed equipment such as monitors, document cameras, and microphones should not be moved without assistance.  Do not remove or change pre-existing cables.  Do not bring in outside equipment such as projectors or video splitters without first contacting the IT Office for further guidance and instruction.

**Courtroom Technology Information**

Most courtrooms at the U.S. Court of Federal Claims contain the following technology:

**Video Evidence Presentation System**
                                    - Each courtroom contains 2-4 large screen monitors with desktop monitors for Judge, witness, council tables and lectern  *courtroom resolution varies, common resolutions are:  1280x768, 1280x720, and 1920x1080
                                    - Document camera at lectern – display paper items on all screens in the courtroom
                                    - HDMI and VGA connection for laptops at council tables, lectern, and witness – show laptop screen on all monitors in the courtroom and play audio through the sound system**  *some courtrooms support VGA only
                                    - Annotation – allows users at the lectern or witness position to draw on the screen to highlight items on display**

**Audio System**
                                    - Assisted listening and interpreter systems – headphones provide the audio in the courtroom for the hearing impaired**
                                    - Wireless microphone – handheld mic or lapel mic**
                                    - Audio conferencing – allow multiple parties to participate over the sound system via telephone in the courtroom. The court requires parties use a landline for quality, no cell phones

**Video Conferencing**
                                    - Video conferencing – allow parties to connect via the U.S. Court video conferencing bridge.  Courtrooms contain three cameras: Judge, lectern / council table, witness. Consumer quality video conferencing software is not permitted (i.e. Skype, Face Time).  Parties must have permission from the Judge and arrange at least one month in advance for use of video conferencing technology**
                                    - For more information on video conferencing,  click here.

*****not available in all courtrooms***

Howard T. Markey National Courts Building • 717 Madison Place, NW, Washington, DC 20439 • 202-357-6400
PAGE 1 – DEFENDANT’S SENTENCING MEMORANDUM 

Ruben L. Iñiguez

Assistant Federal Public Defender

101 S.W. Main Street, Suite 1700

Portland, Oregon 97204

(503) 326-2123 Telephone

(503) 326-5524 Facsimile

ruben_iniguez@fd.org

Attorney for Defendant

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

WINSTON SHROUT,

Defendant.

Case No. 3:15-cr-00438-JO-1

DEFENDANT’S SENTENCING 

MEMORANDUM 

The defendant, Winston Shrout, through his attorney, Ruben L. Iñiguez, submits this 

Memorandum for the Court’s review and consideration in determining a reasonable sentence that 

is “sufficient, but not greater than necessary,” as required by 18 U.S.C. §3553(a). A sentencing 

hearing is currently scheduled for Monday, October 22, 2018, at 10:00 a.m.

On April 21, 2017, after trial, Ms. Shrout was convicted of six misdemeanor counts of 

willful failure to file tax returns (Counts 14-19) and 13 felony counts of producing, presenting, and 

shipping fictitious financial instruments (Counts 1-13). CR 109. He has since reviewed the final 

Presentence Investigation Report and Addendum (“PSR”). He agrees with many, but not all,

aspects of the PSR. He agrees he has no prior criminal history (PSR at ¶¶45-50), he agrees with 

the Criminal History Computation (PSR at ¶47), and he agrees with the description of his Personal 

Case 3:15-cr-00438-JO Document 158 Filed 10/17/18 Page 1 of 2
PAGE 2 – DEFENDANT’S SENTENCING MEMORANDUM 

History and Characteristics (PSR at ¶¶51-67). Nor does he dispute the account of the Offense 

Conduct (PSR at ¶¶8-26). He objects, however, to the Offense Level Computations (PSR at ¶¶33-

43) and the premature calculation of restitution (PSR at 81).

There is no plea agreement in this case. Accordingly, Mr. Shrout may recommend any 

reasonable sentence. He asks the Court to grant a downward departure on the basis of diminished 

capacity. He also urges the Court to grant a further variance after considering all statutory 

sentencing factors under §3553(a), including, but not limited to, his personal history and 

characteristics, the mitigating circumstances of the offenses, the need for the sentence imposed to 

provide him with suitable treatment in the community, the need for the sentence imposed to reflect 

the seriousness of the offenses, to promote respect for the law, to provide just punishment, to afford 

adequate deterrence, and to protect the public, and the need for restitution.

Mr. Shrout respectfully recommends that the Court impose the following sentence: one day 

imprisonment, followed by a maximum, five-year term of supervised release that includes special 

conditions such as 12 months of home detention, 160 hours of community service, and restitution 

(in an amount to be determined); no fine; and a $1,450 special fee assessment.

RESPECTFULLY submitted this 17th day of October, 2018.

/s/ Ruben L. Iñiguez

Ruben L. Iñiguez

Assistant Federal Public Defender

Case 3:15-cr-00438-JO Document 158 Filed 10/17/18 Page 2 of 2