Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 14, 2021 / Notices 51113 

places where people live or stay, in a 

group living arrangement that is owned 

or managed by an entity or organization 

providing housing and/or services for 

the residents, such as college/university 

student housing, residential treatment 

centers, skilled nursing facilities, group 

homes, military barracks, correctional 

facilities, workers’ group living quarters 

and Job Corps centers, and emergency 

and transitional shelters. The Census 

Bureau collects data for GQs primarily 

through personal interview. The Census 

Bureau will obtain the facility 

information by conducting a personal 

visit interview with a GQ contact. 

During this interview, the Census 

Bureau obtains roster of residents and 

randomly selects them for person-level 

interviews. During the person-level 

phase, an FR uses CAPI automated 

instrument to collect detailed 

information for each sampled resident. 

FRs also have the option to distribute a 

bilingual (English/Spanish) 

questionnaire to residents for selfresponse if unable to complete a CAPI 

interview. 

III. Data 

OMB Control Number: 0607–0810. 

Form Number(s): ACS–1, ACS–1(SP), 

ACS–1(PR), ACS–1(PR)SP, ACS–1(GQ), 

ACS–1(PR)(GQ), GQFQ, ACS CAPI 

(HU), ACS RI (HU), AGQ QI, and AGQ 

RI. 

Type of Review: Regular submission, 

Request for an Extension, without 

Change. 

Affected Public: Individuals or 

households. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

3,540,000 for household respondents; 

20,000 for contacts in GQ; 170,000 

persons in GQ; 43,200 households for 

reinterview; and 2,000 GQ contacts for 

reinterview. The total estimated number 

of respondents is 3,775,200. 

Estimated Time per Response: 40 

minutes for the average household 

questionnaire; 15 minutes for a GQ 

facility questionnaire; 25 minutes for a 

GQ person questionnaire; 10 minutes for 

a household reinterview; 10 minutes for 

a GQ-level reinterview. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden 

Hours: 2,360,000 for household 

respondents; 5,000 for contacts in GQ; 

70,833 for GQ residents 7,200 

households for reinterview; and 333 GQ 

contacts for reinterview. The estimate is 

an annual average of 2,443,366 burden 

hours. 

TABLE 1—ANNUAL ACS RESPONDENT AND BURDEN HOUR ESTIMATES

Data collection operation Forms or instrument used in data collection 

Annual 

estimated 

number of 

respondents 

Estimated 

minutes per 

respondent by 

data collection 

activity 

Annual 

estimated 

burden hours 

I. ACS Household Questionnaire, Online Survey, Telephone, and Personal Visit.ACS–1, ACS 1(SP), ACS–1PR, ACS– 

1PR(SP), Online Survey, Telephone, CAPI.

3,540,000 40 2,360,000 

II. ACS GQ Facility Questionnaire CAPI— 

Telephone and Personal Visit.

CAPI GQFQ ................................................... 20,000 15 5,000 

III. ACS GQ CAPI Personal Interview or Telephone, and Paper Self-response.CAPI, ACS–1(GQ), ACS–1(GQ)(PR) ............ 170,000 25 70,833 

IV. ACS Household Reinterview—CATI/CAPI ACS HU–RI .................................................... 43,200 10 7,200 

V. ACS GQ-level Reinterview—CATI/CAPI .... ACS GQ–RI .................................................... 2,000 10 333 

Totals ....................................................... ......................................................................... 3,775,200 N/A 2,443,366 

Estimated Annualized Respondent Burden Hours. 

Estimated Total Annual Cost to 

Public: $0. (This is not the cost of 

respondents’ time, but the indirect costs 

respondents may incur for such things 

as purchases of specialized software or 

hardware needed to report, or 

expenditures for accounting or records 

maintenance services required 

specifically by the collection.) 

Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory. 

Legal Authority: Title 13 U.S.C. 

Section 141 and 193. 

IV. Request for Comments 

We are soliciting public comments to 

permit the Department/Bureau to: (a) 

Evaluate whether the proposed 

information collection is necessary for 

the proper functions of the Department, 

including whether the information will 

have practical utility; (b) Evaluate the 

accuracy of our estimate of the time and 

cost burden for this proposed collection, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; (c) 

Evaluate ways to enhance the quality, 

utility, and clarity of the information to 

be collected; and (d) Minimize the 

reporting burden on those who are to 

respond, including the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology. 

Comments that you submit in 

response to this notice are a matter of 

public record. We will include, or 

summarize, each comment in our 

request to OMB to approve this ICR. 

Before including your address, phone 

number, email address, or other 

personal identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment—including your 

personal identifying information—may 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you may ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

Sheleen Dumas, 

Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of 

the Chief Information Officer, Commerce 

Department. 

[FR Doc. 2021–19805 Filed 9–13–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–07–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Bureau of Industry and Security 

In the Matter of: Tengiz Sydykov, 2805 

8th Street South, Arlington, VA 22204– 

2245; Order Denying Export Privileges 

On January 11, 2019 in the U.S. 

District Court for the Eastern District of 

Virginia, Tengiz Sydykov (‘‘Sydykov’’) 

was convicted of violating section 38 of 

the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 

2778) (‘‘AECA’’). Specifically, Sydykov 

was convicted for knowingly and 

willfully exporting and causing to be 

exported from the United States to 


tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICES
51114 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 14, 2021 / Notices 

1ECRA was enacted as part of the John S. McCain 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2019, and, as amended, is codified at 50 U.S.C. 

4801–4852. Sydykov’s conviction post-dates 

ECRA’s enactment on August 13, 2018. 

2The Regulations are currently codified in the 

Code of Federal Regulations at 15 CFR parts 730– 

774 (2021). 

3Pursuant to recent amendments to the 

Regulations, the Director of the Office of Export 

Enforcement is now the authorizing official for 

issuance of denial orders. (85 FR 73411, November 

18, 2020). 

Grozny, Chechnya, Russia defense 

articles, that is: 7 Assembled firearms, 

130 fully assembled lower recievers, 266 

firearm slides, 158 firearm barrels, 996 

firearm magazines, 10 stocks, 133 

firearm frames and 453 functional 

firearms including springs and firing 

pins, which were designated as defense 

articles on the United States Munitions 

List, without having first obtained the 

required licenses or written approval 

from the United States Department of 

State. As a result of his conviction, the 

Court sentenced Sydykov to 36 months 

in prison, three years supervised 

release, and a $100 assessment. 

Pursuant to Section 1760(e) of the 

Export Control Reform Act of 2018 

(‘‘ECRA’’),1 the export privileges of any 

person who has been convicted of 

certain offenses, including, but not 

limited to, section 38 of the AECA, may 

be denied for a period of up to ten (10) 

years from the date of his/her 

conviction. 50 U.S.C. 4819(e) (Prior 

Convictions). In addition, any Bureau of 

Industry and Security (‘‘BIS’’) licenses 

or other authorizations issued under 

ECRA, in which the person had an 

interest at the time of the conviction, 

may be revoked. Id. 

BIS received notice of Sydykov’s 

conviction for violating Section 38 of 

the AECA, and has provided notice and 

opportunity for Sydykov to make a 

written submission to BIS, as provided 

in Section 766.25 of the Export 

Administration Regulations (‘‘EAR’’ or 

the ‘‘Regulations’’). 15 CFR 766.25.2 BIS 

has not received a written submission 

from Sydykov. 

Based upon my review of the record 

and consultations with BIS’s Office of 

Exporter Services, including its 

Director, and the facts available to BIS, 

I have decided to deny Sydykov’s export 

privileges under the Regulations for a 

period of 10 years from the date of 

Sydykov’s conviction. The Office of 

Exporter Services has also decided to 

revoke any BIS-issued licenses in which 

Sydykov had an interest at the time of 

his conviction.3

Accordingly, it is hereby Ordered: 

First, from the date of this Order until 

January 11, 2029, Tengiz Sydykov, with 

a last known address of 2805 8th Street 

South, Arlington, VA 22204–2245, and 

when acting for or on his behalf, his 

successors, assigns, employees, agents, 

or representatives (‘‘the Denied 

Person’’), may not, directly or indirectly, 

participate in any way in any 

transaction involving any commodity, 

software, or technology (hereinafter 

collectively referred to as ‘‘item’’) 

exported or to be exported from the 

United States that is subject to the 

Regulations, including, but not limited 

to: 

A. Applying for, obtaining, or using 

any license, license exception, or export 

control document; 

B. Carrying on negotiations 

concerning, or ordering, buying, 

receiving, using, selling, delivering, 

storing, disposing of, forwarding, 

transporting, financing, or otherwise 

servicing in any way, any transaction 

involving any item exported or to be 

exported from the United States that is 

subject to the Regulations, or engaging 

in any other activity subject to the 

Regulations; or 

C. Benefitting in any way from any 

transaction involving any item exported 

or to be exported from the United States 

that is subject to the Regulations, or 

from any other activity subject to the 

Regulations. 

Second, no person may, directly or 

indirectly, do any of the following: 

A. Export, reexport, or transfer (incountry) to or on behalf of the Denied 

Person any item subject to the 

Regulations; 

B. Take any action that facilitates the 

acquisition or attempted acquisition by 

the Denied Person of the ownership, 

possession, or control of any item 

subject to the Regulations that has been 

or will be exported from the United 

States, including financing or other 

support activities related to a 

transaction whereby the Denied Person 

acquires or attempts to acquire such 

ownership, possession or control; 

C. Take any action to acquire from or 

to facilitate the acquisition or attempted 

acquisition from the Denied Person of 

any item subject to the Regulations that 

has been exported from the United 

States; 

D. Obtain from the Denied Person in 

the United States any item subject to the 

Regulations with knowledge or reason 

to know that the item will be, or is 

intended to be, exported from the 

United States; or 

E. Engage in any transaction to service 

any item subject to the Regulations that 

has been or will be exported from the 

United States and which is owned, 

possessed or controlled by the Denied 

Person, or service any item, of whatever 

origin, that is owned, possessed or 

controlled by the Denied Person if such 

service involves the use of any item 

subject to the Regulations that has been 

or will be exported from the United 

States. For purposes of this paragraph, 

servicing means installation, 

maintenance, repair, modification or 

testing. 

Third, pursuant to Section 1760(e) of 

ECRA (50 U.S.C. 4819(e)) and sections 

766.23 and 766.25 of the Regulations, 

any other person, firm, corporation, or 

business organization related to 

Sydykov by ownership, control, 

position of responsibility, affiliation, or 

other connection in the conduct of trade 

or business may also be made subject to 

the provisions of this Order in order to 

prevent evasion of this Order. 

Fourth, in accordance with part 756 of 

the Regulations, Sydykov may file an 

appeal of this Order with the Under 

Secretary of Commerce for Industry and 

Security. The appeal must be filed 

within 45 days from the date of this 

Order and must comply with the 

provisions set forth in part 756 of the 

Regulations. 

Fifth, a copy of this Order shall be 

delivered to Sydykov and shall be 

published in the Federal Register. 

Sixth, this Order is effective 

immediately and shall remain in effect 

until January 11 2029. 

John Sonderman, 

Director, Office of Export Enforcement. 

[FR Doc. 2021–19723 Filed 9–13–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DT–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Bureau of Industry And Security 

In the Matter of: Rrok Martin Camaj, 

Inmate Number: 57521–039, FCI 

Morgantown, Federal Correctional 

Institution, P.O. Box 1000, 

Morgantown, WV 26507; Order 

Denying Export Privileges 

On February 28, 2020 in the U.S. 

District Court for the Eastern District of 

Michigan, Rrok Martin Camaj (‘‘Camaj’’) 

was convicted of violating Section 38 of 

the Arms Export Control Act, 22 U.S.C. 

2778 (‘‘AECA’’). Specifically, Camaj was 

convicted of knowingly and willfully 

exporting and causing to be exported 

from the United States to Australia, that 

is pistol frames/receivers, magazines, 

pistols kits, and other firearm parts, 

which were defense articles on the 

United States Munitions List, without 

having first obtained from the United 

States Department of State, a license or 

other written approval for such export. 

Camaj was sentenced to 42 months in 


tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICES