alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Plaintiff(s)

Civil Action No. 3:15-cv-02353

TWEAK FOOTWEAR, lNC., a Delaware corporation,

et al.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CTVIL ACTION

To'. (Defendant's name and address) Tweak Footwear, lnc.

c/o R/A National Corporate Research, Ltd

850 New Burton Road, Suite 201

Dover, DE 19904

A lawsuit has been filed against you'

Within 21 daysafter service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) - or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

p. 12 (a)(2) or (3) 

- 

you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff s attorney,

whose name and address are:

Stephen M. Feldman, OSB No. 932674

Perkins Coie LLP

1120 N.W. Couch Street, Tenth Floor

Portland, OR 97 209-41 28

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint

You also must file your answer or motion with the court'

CLERK OF COURT

V

)

)))))))

)

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

-SB

12/17/2015 By: s/D. St. Germain, Deputy Clerk
D I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ;or

D I left the summons at the individual's residence or usual place of abo de with (name¡

, 

a person ofsuitable age and discretion who resides there'

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual's last known address; orÍ I served the summons on (name of individual)

designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ;or

O I returned the summons unexecuted becausei Other (specify)

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ 0.00

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Server's sígnature

Printed name and title

Server's address

, 

who is

;or

Date:

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of SRS Labs, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K, as amended, for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Walter J. McBride, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:

 

1.                                      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:   April 30, 2012 | By:      | /s/ WALTER J. MCBRIDE           |
|------------------------------|----------|---------------------------------|
|                         |     | Walter J. McBride               |
| * *                     | * * | *Chief Financial Officer*       |
| * *                     | * * | *(Principal Financial Officer)* |

 

----
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     Financial Data Schedule for the Second Quarter 1997
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0001000779
<NAME>                         Consolidated Delivery & Logistics, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     $1.00
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    $1.00
<CASH>                                          2,680
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  25,155
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,313)
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               26,665
<PP&E>                                         15,012
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (8,625)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 37,310
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          22,002
<BONDS>                                         2,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            7
<OTHER-SE>                                      8,452
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   37,310
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               85,443
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  65,171
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               19,943
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  601
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                518
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   548
<INCOME-TAX>                                      548
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               548
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      329
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        .05
        



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Entheos Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on the Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Derek Cooper, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(i)        the Report filed by the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(ii)       The information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



ENTHEOS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.Date:October 1, 2009
     
     By:
     
     /s/ Derek CooperDerek Cooper
President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director




This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







---
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 11.1


                              VIALOG CORPORATION
             STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND 1997

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                      1996         1997
                                                     ------       ------
<S>                                                <C>          <C>
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE
------------------------
   Weighted average common shares outstanding      2,088,146     2,889,005
                                                   =========     =========

DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
--------------------------
   Weighted average common shares outstanding      2,088,146     2,889,005
   Common stock equivalents                              --           --
                                                   ---------     ---------
   Total                                           2,088,146     2,889,005
                                                   =========     =========



</TABLE>
<PAGE>

 
TERRACE HOLDINGS, INC.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

EXHIBIT 11
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<TABLE>
<CAPTION> 
                                                                             March 31,
                                                                             ---------
                                                                        1 9 9 8     1 9 9 7
                                                                        -------     -------
<S>                                                                     <C>         <C>
Weighted average:
 Weight Average Shares Outstanding Disregarding Potentially Dilutive
  Common Stock Purchased Warrants                                       5,111,383   4,306,400

 Plus incremental shares from assumed conversion:
  Convertible Preferred Stock                                           3,047,650
 
 Assuming Conversion of Warrants [1]                                           --          --
                                                                        ---------   ---------
 
 Common Shares Outstanding                                              8,159,033   4,306,400
                                                                        =========   =========

 Income [Loss] for Fully Diluted Calculations                           $ 133,974   $(401,404)
                                                                        =========   ========= 

 Basic Income[Loss] Per Common Share                                    $     .03   $    (.09)
                                                                        =========   ========= 

 Diluted Income [Loss] Per Common Share                                 $     .02   $    (.09)
                                                                        =========   ========= 
</TABLE>

[1] Warrants to purchase common shares are excluded from the calculation as
they are considered anti-dilutive.  However, if effect was given to the exercise
of all such warrants, common shares outstanding would have been increased by
9,488,450.
735 A.2d 73

#### In the Matter of Angela C.W. BELFON.

No. 523 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

July 15, 1999.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 15th day of July, 1999, Angela C.W. Belfon having been suspended from the practice of law in the State of *544New Jersey for a period of nine months by Order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey dated January 26, 1999; the said Angela C.W. Belfon having been directed on May 20, 1999, to inform this Court of any claim she has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and no response having been filed, it is

ORDERED that Angela C.W. Belfon is suspended from the practice of law in this Commonwealth for a period of nine months, and she shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.
#### Matthew D. Penna, Jr., et al., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Appellants, v National Gypsum Company, Respondent.

— Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: We agree with Special Term that the complaint, which attempts to allege breach of warranty based upon a written guarantee issued in connection with the sale of house siding, fails to state a cause of action. By its terms, the guarantee assured the purchasers that the siding would not need painting for the life of the house on which it is installed and that it would resist the ravages of rot, termites and rodents. Plaintiffs do not allege any breach of the terms of the guarantee, but allege only that the nails holding the siding were loosening and in some cases the siding was falling off. They failed also to allege compliance with the condition of the guarantee that the siding was installed according to instructions published by the Mineral Fibers Products Bureau. Moreover, they failed to state facts showing that they were parties to the guarantee or either intended beneficiaries who purchased their homes in reliance thereon *(see, Randy Knitwear v American Cyanamid Co.,*11 NY2d 5). (Appeal from order and judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Reed, J. — dismiss complaint.) Present —Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
Exhibit 23.1




















Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm











The Board
of Directors and Shareholders


Antares
Pharma, Inc.:




We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-152472) on Form S-8, registration statements (Nos. 333-61950, 333-96739,
333-103958, 333-133218, 333-142323, 333-144748 and 333-158630) on Form S-3
and registration statements (Nos. 333-114098 and 333-109114) on Form S-2 of
Antares Pharma, Inc. of our report dated March 23, 2010, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of Antares Pharma, Inc. as of December 31, 2009
and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’
equity and comprehensive loss, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2009, which report appears in the December
31, 2009 annual report on Form 10-K of Antares Pharma, Inc (the
Company).




As
disclosed in notes 2 and 12 to the consolidated financial statements, the
Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Update
2009-13, Revenue Arrangements
with Multiple Deliverables, in the third quarter of 2009 with
retrospective application to January 1, 2009.




/s/ KPMG
LLP






Minneapolis,
Minnesota


March 23,
2010
**EXHIBIT 31.2** **CERTIFICATIONS**     I, Jane M. Richards., certify that:     1. I have reviewed this    Form 10-KSB    of PYR Energy Corporation.     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this report, fairly    present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I    are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure    controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is    being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably    likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal    control over financial reporting:     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. /s/  Jane    M. Richards
83139160v1

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Page 1

Megan M. Coluccio, OSB No. 152530

SEDGWICK LLP

520 Pike Street, Suite 2200

Seattle, WA 98101-4093

Telephone: 206.462.7560

megan.coluccio@sedgwicklaw.com

Nicholas J. Boos, Admitted Pro Hac Vice

SEDGWICK LLP

333 Bush Street, 30th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: 415.781.7900

nicholas.boos@sedgwicklaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff TRAVELERS PROPERTY 

CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON

PORTLAND DIVISION

TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY 

COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Connecticut 

corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

PEAK WEB, LLC, a California limited liability 

company,

Defendant.

Case No. 3:16-cv-00132-SB

PLAINTIFF TRAVELERS PROPERTY 

CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA’S 

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE

[Clerk's Action Required]

TO: Clerk of the Court; 

AND TO: All Parties and their Counsel of Record.

Case 3:16-cv-00132-SB Document 11 Filed 04/11/16 Page 1 of 2
83139160v1

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Page 2

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that plaintiff Travelers Property Casualty Company of 

America hereby dismisses its complaint on file herein, with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 

41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The defendant has not filed an answer to 

the complaint or a motion for summary judgment.

DATED this 11th day of April, 2016 SEDGWICK LLP

s/Megan M. Coluccio

Megan M. Coluccio, OSB No. 152530

Attorneys for Plaintiff Travelers Property Casualty 

Company of America

Case 3:16-cv-00132-SB Document 11 Filed 04/11/16 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 4.6


 


CERTIFICATE OF DOMESTICATION


 


OF 


 


ACT II
GLOBAL ACQUISITION CORP. 


 


Pursuant to Sections 103 and 388 of the
General


Corporation Law of the State of Delaware


 


Act II Global Acquisition Corp., a Cayman
Islands exempted company limited by its shares, which intends to domesticate as a Delaware corporation pursuant to this Certificate
of Domestication (upon such domestication to be renamed “Whole Earth Brands, Inc.” and referred to herein after such
time as the “Corporation”), does hereby certify to the following facts relating to the domestication of the Corporation
in the State of Delaware:


 


1.             The
Corporation was originally incorporated on the 16th day of August, 2018 under the laws of the Cayman Islands.


 


2.             The
name of the Corporation immediately prior to the filing of this Certificate of Domestication is Act II Global Acquisition Corp.


 


3.             The
name of the Corporation as set forth in the Certificate of Incorporation is Whole Earth Brands, Inc.


 


4.             The
jurisdiction that constituted the seat, siege social or principal place of business or central administration of the Corporation
immediately prior to the filing of this Certificate of Domestication is the Cayman Islands.


 


5.             The
domestication has been approved in the manner provided for by the document, instrument, agreement or other writing, as the case
may be, governing the internal affairs of Act II Global Acquisition Corp. and the conduct of its business or by applicable non-Delaware
law, as appropriate.


 


6.             Pursuant
to Section 103(d) of the Delaware General Corporation Law, this Certificate of Domestication shall be effective at          
[a.m./p.m.] on                    ,
2020.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation
has caused this Certificate of Domestication to be executed in its name this         
day of               , 2020.


 


	 	ACT II GLOBAL ACQUISITION CORP., a Cayman Islands company
	 	 
		By:
		Name:
		Title:
#### Beal Savings Bank, Appellant, v Viola Sommer et al., Respondents.

Submitted February 5, 2007;

decided March 22, 2007

Motion to dismiss appeal as moot denied.

Judges Read and Jones taking no part.
Exhibit 99.1(a)
                                                                 
ADVANTA                                 Advanta
                                             Mortgage
                                             Suite 400
                                             Fort Washington, PA 19034
                                             215-283-4200




    Report of Management on Compliance with Minimum Servicing Standards
                                


As of and for the year ended December 31, 1995, Advanta Mortgage
Corp. USA has complied in all material respects with the minimum
servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association
of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
Bankers. As of and for the same period, Advanta Mortgage Corp.
USA had in effect fidelity bond coverage in the amount of $10
million and mortgage contingent liability protection coverage in
the amount of $2 million.


\s\ William P. Garland         \s\ James L. Shreero
William P. Garland             James L. Shreero
Senior Vice President          Vice President
Loan Servicing                 Finance and Accounting
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Lemon, Appellant.

The People concede, and we agree, that the proof adduced at the trial was insufficient to sustain a conviction of robbery in the first degree *(see,*Penal Law § 160.15 [3]). The victim testified that she did not actually observe a weapon at the time of the commission of the robbery or immediately thereafter; moreover, no circumstantial evidence was offered from which the jury could properly infer the use or threatened immediate use of a dangerous instrument *(cf. People v Pena,*50 NY2d 400, *cert denied*449 US 1087). Nevertheless, there is sufficient evidence to support a conviction of the lesser included charge of robbery in the third degree *(see,*Penal Law § 160.05).

We concur, furthermore, with the finding of the hearing court that the efforts of the police in attempting to locate the defendant were sufficient to meet the statutory standard of "due diligence” (CPL 30.30 [4] [c]).

The defendant’s remaining contention on appeal is unpre*680served for our review and, in any event, is without merit. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.