alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1691 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1691

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prohibit an institution of 
  higher education located in the United States from participating in 
     student assistance programs under title IV of such Act if the 
 institution bans the display of the flag of the United States on its 
                                campus.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 26, 2015

 Mr. Duffy (for himself, Mr. Fortenberry, and Mr. Newhouse) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education 
                           and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prohibit an institution of 
  higher education located in the United States from participating in 
     student assistance programs under title IV of such Act if the 
 institution bans the display of the flag of the United States on its 
                                campus.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Federal Funds Without the 
American Flag Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITING PARTICIPATION IN FEDERAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS BY 
              INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION BANNING DISPLAY OF FLAG 
              OF UNITED STATES ON CAMPUS.

    Section 487(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1094(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(30) The institution will not ban the display of the flag 
        of the United States on its campus, except that this paragraph 
        does not apply to an institution described in section 
        102(a)(1)(C).''.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk November 20, 2012

s1113 

# Order

November 20, 2012

145552

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145552

COA: 309590

Washtenaw CC: 05

- 001533

- FH

LEWIS DESHAWN FAIRLEY

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 13 , 2012 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
**Exhibit      32.2 -**
**Certification      of Principal Financial Officer**

**CERTIFICATION      IN ACCORDANCE WITH**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED BY**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                 |                                   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|   |                                                 | /s/                Jennifer S. LeBlanc |
|   | Jennifer                S. LeBlanc                   |
|   | Chief                Financial Officer and Secretary |
|   | Date: February                9, 2007           |

----
**Exhibit 31.2**
**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**
I, Graham B. Perkins, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of LCC International, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;
     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.     Date: March 26, 2004         /s/ Graham B. Perkins      Graham B. Perkins   Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer   and Treasurer
Exhibit 32

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

The following statement is provided by the undersigned to
accompany the foregoing Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed filed pursuant to any provision of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or any other securities law.

Each of the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-Q
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Broadway Financial Corporation at the dates and for the periods indicated.



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 13, 2009 |  | By:  /s/ Paul C. Hudson
|                        |  | Paul C. Hudson         
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                        | 
|Date: November 13, 2009 |  | By:  /s/ Samuel Sarpong
|                        |  | Samuel Sarpong         
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer
(18 Misc. Rep. 371.)

#### STANDISH v. BRADY.

(City Court of New York,

General Term.

October 30, 1896.)

Customs and Usases—Terms of Contract.

Evidence of a professional custom is admissible to show the improbability of a provision of a contract for services alleged by plaintiff, and denied by defendant.

Appeal from trial term.

Action by May C. Standish against William A. Brady for contractual value of services rendered. From a judgment entered on a verdict in favor of plaintiff, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendant appeals. Reversed.

Argued before YAH WYCK, C. J., and FITZSIMOHS and ' SOHUCHMAH, JJ.

Dittenhoefer, Gerber & James, for appellant.

Howe & Hummel, for respondent.

SOHUCHMAH, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon the verdict of a jury on a trial before Mr. Justice O’Dwyer, and also from an order denying a motion for a new trial. The plaintiff alleges in her complaint, and proves at the trial, a special agreement, engaging her services as an actress by the defendant, for the season from September 2, 1891, to April 5, 1895, or thereabouts, at a salary of $30 per week. The defendant, in his answer and at the trial, denied that any such agreement was made, and especially denied the duration of the said contract. The defendant, at the trial, offered to prove a uniform custom in the profession, *652when an actress is engaged for an inferior character, such as the plaintiff, and the engagement is for the season, to have a contract in writing, with the clause reserving the right to either party to terminate the contract on two weeks’ notice. The offer was objected to; the objection sustained; and the exception taken. The defendant, by the sixth request, requested the court to charge the substance of the said offer, which request was denied, and exception taken by the defendant. This brings up squarely the question whether the evidence should have been admitted or not.

The rule of law seems to be, in controversies where a special agreement is alleged to have been made on one side, and is denied on the other, that it is relevant to put in evidence any circumstances which tend to make the proposition at issue either more or less improbable; and this, not to change the contract, -but as evidence of what it was, and the probability that the agreement or one of the other was made. Barney v. Fuller, 133 N. Y. 605-607, 30 N. E. 1007, 1008; Rubino v. Scott, 118 N. Y. 662, 22 N. E. 1103; Ostrander v. Snyder, 73 Hun, 378-382, 26 N. Y. Supp. 263, 266; Cornell v. Markham, 19 Hun, 275, at page 276. On that rule, we think that the rejected evidence should have been admitted.

The exception being an error, judgment and order must be reversed, with costs to the appellant to abide the event All concur.
# L_2009151EN.01002601.xml

| 16.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 151/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 151/26

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 506/2009

of 15 June 2009

entering a designation in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed (Olej rydzowy (TSG))

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 509/2006 of 20 March 2006 on agricultural products and foodstuffs as traditional specialities guaranteed (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 9(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | In accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 509/2006, and pursuant to Article 19(3) of the same Regulation, the application submitted by Poland to enter the designation ‘Olej rydzowy’ in the register was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 509/2006, and pursuant to Article 19(3) of the same Regulation, the application submitted by Poland to enter the designation ‘Olej rydzowy’ in the register was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no objection under Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 509/2006 has been received by the Commission, this designation should be entered in the register. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no objection under Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 509/2006 has been received by the Commission, this designation should be entered in the register.

| (3) | Protection as referred to in Article 13(2) of Regulation (EC) No 509/2006 has not been requested, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Protection as referred to in Article 13(2) of Regulation (EC) No 509/2006 has not been requested,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The designation contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 June 2009.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 244, 25.9.2008, p. 27.

2

---

ANNEX

Products listed in Annex I to the EC Treaty, intended for human consumption:

Class 1.5.   Oils and fats (butter, margarine, oil, etc.)

Olej rydzowy (TSG)

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         110,737
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  324,028
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,017,236
<PP&E>                                          80,052
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,267,033
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,094,044
<BONDS>                                      1,899,772
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,273,217
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,267,033
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               353,894
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               266,313
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 87,581
<INCOME-TAX>                                    38,269
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             49,312
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    49,312
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# L_2009338EN.01008101.xml

| 19.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 338/81 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 338/81

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 1264/2009

of 18 December 2009

on the issue of import licences for applications lodged during the first seven days of December 2009 under the tariff quota opened by Regulation (EC) No 1384/2007 for poultrymeat originating in Israel

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 of 31 August 2006 laying down common rules for the administration of import tariff quotas for agricultural products managed by a system of import licences (2), and in particular Article 7(2) thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1384/2007 of 26 November 2007 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 2398/96 as regards opening and providing for the administration of certain quotas for imports into the Community of poultrymeat products originating in Israel (3), and in particular Article 5(5) thereof,

Whereas:

The applications for import licences lodged during the first seven days of December 2009 for the subperiod from 1 January to 31 March 2010 relate to quantities exceeding those available for licences under the quota with order number 09.4092. The extent to which import licences may be issued should therefore be determined by establishing the allocation coefficient to be applied to the quantities requested,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The quantities for which import licence applications have been lodged under Regulation (EC) No 1384/2007 for the subperiod from 1 January to 31 March 2010 shall be multiplied by the allocation coefficients set out in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 19 December 2009.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 December 2009.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 13.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 309, 27.11.2007, p. 40.

3

---

ANNEX

| Group No | Order No | Allocation coefficient for import licence applications lodged for the subperiod from 1.1.2010-31.3.2010
  (%) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| IL1 | 09.4092 | 74,962518 |

Group No

Order No

Allocation coefficient for import licence applications lodged for the subperiod from 1.1.2010-31.3.2010

(%)

IL1

09.4092

74,962518

---
FLORIDA RIVER ABOVE LEMON RESERVOIR, NR BAYFIELD, COLatitude: 37.427Longitude: -107.674Elevation: 8160

FLORIDA RIVER ABOVE LEMON RESERVOIR, NR BAYFIELD, CO

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Beartown Site Page...



Beartown

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Cascade Site Page...



Cascade

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Cascade #2 Site Page...



Cascade #2

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Molas Lake Site Page...



Molas Lake

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Spud Mountain Site Page...



Spud Mountain

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Stump Lakes Site Page...



Stump Lakes

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Vallecito Site Page...



Vallecito
# C_2009064EN.01001301.xml

| 19.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/13

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5433 — Sanacorp/V.D. Linde)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 64/03)

On 4 March 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5433. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5433. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-19-00363-CV

Joseph Andrew BURT, II,

Appellant

v.

DENNY'S, INC.,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CV02727-A

Honorable Karen Crouch, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE RIOS, AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that appellee, Denny’s, Inc., recover its costs of this appeal from 

appellant, Joseph Andrew Burt, II.

SIGNED March 25, 2020.

_____________________________

Irene Rios, Justice
H. R. 1884 

One Hundred Fourteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the sixth day of January, two thousand and fifteen 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 206 West 

Commercial Street in East Rochester, New York, as the ‘‘Officer Daryl R. Pierson 

Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. OFFICER DARYL R. PIERSON MEMORIAL POST OFFICE 

BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 206 West Commercial Street in East Rochester, 

New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Officer Daryl 

R. Pierson Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Officer Daryl R. Pierson Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
# L_2016044EN.01002002.xml

| 19.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 44/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 44/20

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 343 of 22 December 2009
  )

On page 68, Article 16(1), second sentence:

for:

‘In the absence of a proper and timely reply a verification visit may not be carried out.’,

read:

‘In the absence of a proper and timely reply, the Commission may choose not to carry out a verification visit.’.

---