alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 175 

To provide for the revision of certification requirements for the labeling 

of certain electronic products under the Energy Star program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2015 

Mr. WOMACK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To provide for the revision of certification requirements for 

the labeling of certain electronic products under the Energy Star program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘ENERGY STAR Reg5 ulatory Improvement Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. THIRD-PARTY CERTIFICATION UNDER ENERGY 

7 STAR PROGRAM. 

8 Section 324A of the Energy Policy and Conservation 

9 Act (42 U.S.C. 6294a) is amended by adding at the end 

10 the following: 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 175 IH

1 ‘‘(e) THIRD-PARTY CERTIFICATION.— 

2 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), 

3 not later than 180 days after the date of enactment 

4 of this subsection, the Administrator shall revise the 

5 certification requirements for the labeling of con6 sumer, home, and office electronic products for pro7 gram partners that have complied with all require8 ments of the Energy Star program for a period of 

9 at least 18 months. 

10 ‘‘(2) ADMINISTRATION.—In the case of a pro11 gram partner described in paragraph (1), the new 

12 requirements under paragraph (1)— 

13 ‘‘(A) shall not require third-party certifi14 cation for a product to be listed; but 

15 ‘‘(B) may require that test data and other 

16 product information be submitted to facilitate 

17 product listing and performance verification for 

18 a sample of products. 

19 ‘‘(3) THIRD PARTIES.—Nothing in this sub20 section prevents the Administrator from using third 

21 parties in the course of the administration of the 

22 Energy Star program. 

23 ‘‘(4) TERMINATION.— 

24 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subpara25 graph (B), an exemption from third-party cerVerDate Sep 11 2014 19:49 Jan 11, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H175.IH H175

tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 175 IH

1 tification provided to a program partner under 

2 paragraph (1) shall terminate if the program 

3 partner is found to have violated program re4 quirements with respect to at least 2 separate 

5 models during a 2-year period. 

6 ‘‘(B) RESUMPTION.—A termination for a 

7 program partner under subparagraph (A) shall 

8 cease if the program partner complies with all 

9 Energy Star program requirements for a period 

10 of at least 3 years.’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### KAIN, Respondent, v. CITY OF SYRACUSE, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department.

May 18, 1894.)

Action by Mary Kain against the city of Syracuse.

Argued before HARDIN, P. J., and MARTIN and MERWIN, JJ.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
the unaudited consolidated financial statements of PathoGenesis Corporation for 
the three months ended March 31, 1998, and is qualified in its entirety by 
reference to such financial statements. 
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      1,467,265
<SECURITIES>                               66,313,271         
<RECEIVABLES>                              11,318,597
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                 6,070,696
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           86,291,267 
<PP&E>                                     18,083,173
<DEPRECIATION>                              7,759,331
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             97,403,523
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       6,683,692
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       16,246
<OTHER-SE>                                191,707,694
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               97,403,523
<SALES>                                    14,527,031 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           14,664,897
<CGS>                                       2,669,816         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              14,778,450 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               33,500
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0<F2>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               984,590
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           984,590
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                  984,590
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .06
<FN>

<F1> The amount of receivables reported is net of $1,317,068 of allowances.

<F2> The total costs include loss provision of $100,000.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# L_2010140EN.01002701.xml

| 8.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 140/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 140/27

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 3 June 2010

appointing three Danish alternate members of the Committee of the Regions

(2010/312/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Danish Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU and 2010/29/EU appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU and 2010/29/EU appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015 (1).

| (2) | Three alternate members’ seats on the Committee of the Regions have become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Bent HANSEN, Mr Carl HOLST and Mr Bent LARSEN, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Three alternate members’ seats on the Committee of the Regions have become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Bent HANSEN, Mr Carl HOLST and Mr Bent LARSEN,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following are hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions as alternate members for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2015:

| — | Mr Lasse KRULL, Regionsrådsmedlem, |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr Lasse KRULL, Regionsrådsmedlem,

| — | Ms Bente LAURIDSEN, Regionsrådsmedlem, |
| --- | --- |

—

Ms Bente LAURIDSEN, Regionsrådsmedlem,

| — | Mr Ole B. SØRENSEN, Regionsrådsmedlem. |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr Ole B. SØRENSEN, Regionsrådsmedlem.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the day of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 3 June 2010.

For the Council

The President

A. PÉREZ RUBALCABA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22 and OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.

1

---
#### ISEAR, Appellant, v. DAYNES et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 23, 1896)

Action by Sacharme Isear against William Daynes and others.

A. Perry, for appellant.

L. J. Langbein, for respondents.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with 10 costs and disbursements. WILLIAMS and O’BRIEN, JJ., dissenting. See 37 N. Y. Supp. 474, and 38 N. Y. Supp. 1145.
# L_2010206EN.01002101.xml

| 6.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 206/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 206/21

---

Corrigendum to the definitive adoption of the European Union's general budget for the financial year 2010

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 64 of 12 March 2010
  )

On page 781, in Article 09 06 04 ‘Growth and the audiovisual sector: preparatory actions under the i2i audiovisual initiative’, figures must be read as follows:

| ‘Appropriations 2010 | Appropriations 2009 | Outturn 2008 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Commitments | Payments | Commitments | Payments | Commitments | Payments |
| — | p.m. | — | p.m. | 0,— | 0,—’ |

‘Appropriations 2010

Appropriations 2009

Outturn 2008

Commitments

Payments

Commitments

Payments

Commitments

Payments

—

p.m.

—

p.m.

0,—

0,—’

on page 782, in Article 09 06 05 ‘Preparatory action — Erasmus for Journalists’, figures must be read as follows:

| ‘Appropriations 2010 | Appropriations 2009 | Outturn 2008 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Commitments | Payments | Commitments | Payments | Commitments | Payments |
| 500 000 | 500 000 ’ | | | | |

‘Appropriations 2010

Appropriations 2009

Outturn 2008

Commitments

Payments

Commitments

Payments

Commitments

Payments

500 000

500 000 ’

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6347
In Re: JAMES CLAUDE BAILEY, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-03-187) Submitted: June 15, 2005 Decided: July 28, 2005 Before KING and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Claude Bailey, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: James Claude Bailey petitions for writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion and his motion for immediate release. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find there has been no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny Bailey’s mandamus petition and his motion for appointment of counsel. We further deny as moot his motion for expedited response. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
# L_2011037DE.01003001.xml

| 11.2.2011 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 37/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2011

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 37/30

---

Berichtigung der Richtlinie 2009/33/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 23. April 2009 über die Förderung sauberer und energieeffizienter Straßenfahrzeuge

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 120 vom 15. Mai 2009
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 120 vom 15. Mai 2009

Auf Seite 9, Artikel 3 Buchstabe a:

anstatt:

„Auftraggeber, soweit sie zur Anwendung der Vergabeverfahren nach den Richtlinien 2004/17/EG und 2004/18/EG verpflichtet sind;“

muss es heißen:

„Öffentliche Auftraggeber oder Auftraggeber, soweit sie zur Anwendung der Vergabeverfahren nach den Richtlinien 2004/17/EG und 2004/18/EG verpflichtet sind;“.

Auf Seite 9, Artikel 4 Nummer 3:

anstatt:

„ ‚Straßenverkehrsfahrzeug‘: ein Fahrzeug, das einer der in Tabelle 3 des Anhangs genannten Fahrzeugklassen angehört.“

muss es heißen:

„ ‚Straßenfahrzeug‘: ein Fahrzeug, das einer der in Tabelle 3 des Anhangs genannten Fahrzeugklassen angehört.“

---
#### Dean Ryder et al., Appellants, v City of New York, Respondent.

Submitted January 29, 2007;

decided March 22, 2007

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Exhibit 32.2



Informational Addendum to Report on Form 10-K

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Not Filed Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934



The undersigned Chief Financial Officer of OYO Geospace Corporation does hereby certify as follows:



Solely for the purpose of meeting the requirements of Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and solely to the extent this certification may be applicable to this Report on Form 10-Q, the undersigned hereby certify that this Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in this Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OYO Geospace Corporation.



/s/    Thomas T. McEntireName:

Thomas T. McEntireTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerFebruary 10, 2004
NRCS 1078 - SUN PASSLatitude: 42.786Longitude: -121.977Elevation: None

NRCS 1078 - Sun Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Sun Pass Site Page...



Sun Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Chemult Alternate Site Page...



Chemult Alternate

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Taylor Butte Site Page...



Taylor Butte
#### In the Matter of Carlos C., Appellant.

In a juvenile proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Queens County (Ambrosio, J.), dated May 6, 1986, which, upon a fact-finding order dated March 19, 1986, made after a hearing, finding that the appellant had committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of robbery in the first degree, placed him on probation for a period of two years. The appeal brings up for review the fact-finding order dated March 19, 1986.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The evidence adduced at the fact-finding hearing demonstrates that immediately after conversing with the appellant, an unapprehended youth put a knife to the throat of the victim, and engaged in a scuffle with and took property from him. Throughout the incident, the appellant stood adjacent to the unapprehended youth and the victim while looking up and down the street. After the forcible taking of the victim’s property, the appellant and the unapprehended youth fled the scene together. These facts were sufficient to sustain the finding that the appellant participated in an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of robbery in the first degree (see, *Matter of Wade F.,*49 NY2d 730). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Kunzeman and Harwood, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Purchase Point Media Corporation (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ended  September 30, 2006 filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  I, Albert  Folsom,
President and Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects,  the consolidated  financial  condition of the Company as of the dates
presented and  consolidated  result of operations of the Company for the periods
presented.

Dated: November 13, 2006




                                     BY:  /s/ Albert Folsom
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Albert Folsom, President and Chief
                                          Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.2


 


Loan Agreement


 


Party A (Creditor): Guangdong
Jianianhua Recreation Development Co., Ltd.


 


Party B (Debtor): Qianhai
Meijiao (Shenzhen) Consulting Management Co., Ltd.




 


Party
A and Party B have reached and will strictly implement the following Loan Contract after friendly negotiation.


 


I.
Amount of the loan: ¥2,000,000.00 (two million RMB Yuan only).


 


II.
Purpose of the loan: Payment of the expenses arising from Party B’s daily operating activities.


 


III.
Period of the loan and method for the payment of interests and the repayment of principal:


 


The
loan is provided without interest, and the loan period is one (1) year (from April 15, 2019 to April 14, 2020). Where Party B has
the funds and solvency to repay the loan in advance, Party B may repay the loan to Party A or the payee specified by Party A anytime
before the expiry of the repayment date.


 


IV.
Pledged items and measures for solving risks: The loan occurs between shareholder’s affiliated party, so Party A does not
require Party B to provide pledged items in any form.


 


V.
The above-mentioned Contract is made in two copies, with each party sharing either copy of them, and shall come into force after
the Contract is signed and the loan is received. Any disputes, if there are, shall be solved by the Parties through negotiation.


 





	
        Party A (signature and
        seal):

         

        Guangdong Jianianhua Recreation Development
        Co., Ltd.

         
	
        Party B (signature and
        seal):

         

        Qianhai Meijiao (Shenzhen) Consulting Management
        Co., Ltd.

         

	Date: April 15, 2019	Date: April 15, 2019
#### HESS et al., Board of Water Com’rs, Respondents, v. KECK et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

January 20, 1896.)

Action by Jonah Hess and others, as board of water commissioners, etc., against Joseph Keck and Mary Keck.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Margaret M. Tomeck, Deceased. Edward M. Tomeck, as Executor of Margaret M. Tomeck, Deceased, Respondent-Appellant; Robert Christopher, as Commissioner of Social Services of Saratoga County, Appellant-Respondent, et al., Respondent.

Submitted February 13, 2007;

decided March 27, 2007

Motion to strike portions of appellant-respondent’s brief denied.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JARED B. SEGAL,

Appellant,

v.

PETCO ANIMAL SUPPLIES STORES, INC., a foreign profit corporation,

TOWN OF JUPITER, a Florida municipal corporation, RUSSELL 

COUNTS, individually and KIMBERLY THOMPSON, individually,

Appellees.

No. 4D17-1720

[March 1, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, 

Palm Beach County; David French, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50 2015 CA 9855 

XXX MB.

Robert C. Stone of Robert Stone, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellant.

Lyman H. Reynolds, Jr. and George P. Roberts, Jr. of Roberts Reynolds 

Bedard & Tuzzio, PLLC, West Palm Beach, for appellees for Town of Jupiter 

and Russell Counts.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### In the Matter of Melissa A. Flint, Appellant, v Andrew L. Ely, Respondent.

[947 NYS2d 735]

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Allegany County (Terrence M. Parker, J.), entered July 29, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, inter alia, awarded respondent-petitioner primary physical custody of the subject child.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner-respondent mother appeals from an order that, following a hearing, modified the prior custody order pursuant to which the parties had shared physical custody of their child and awarded primary physical custody of the child to respondent-petitioner father and visitation to the mother. The parties agreed that a change in circumstances was created by virtue of the fact that the child had reached the age where he was attending school, rendering the existing shared physical custody arrangement impractical, and thus we need only address whether it was in the child’s best interests to award pri*1682mary physical custody to the father *(see Matter of Dubuque v Bremiller,*79 AD3d 1743, 1744 [2010]). Contrary to the mother’s contention, Family Court properly determined that awarding primary physical custody of the child to the father was in the child’s best interests. “ ‘Generally, a court’s determination regarding custody and visitation issues, based upon a first-hand assessment of the credibility of the witnesses after an evidentiary hearing, is entitled to great weight and will not be set aside unless it lacks an evidentiary basis in the record’ ” *(id.).*Here, the court’s determination that both parties are fit and loving parents but that the father is better able to provide for the child’s needs is supported by the requisite “ ‘sound and substantial basis in the record’ ” and thus will not be disturbed *(id.).*Present — Centra, J.P., Peradotto, Carni, Lindley and Sconiers, JJ.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                             PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Stephen J. Verleye, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Applied Microsystems
Corporation;

2.       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.       The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         (a)      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         (b)      Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c)      Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and

5.       The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors:

         (a)      All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

         (b)      Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 19, 2003

/s/ Stephen J. Verleye
-------------------------------------
Stephen J. Verleye
President and Chief Executive Officer