alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

Wholly Owned Subsidiaries of Univision Communications Inc.

PTI Holdings, Inc.
Univision Television Group, Inc.
KWEX License Partnership, G.P., a California general partnership
KUVN License Partnership, G.P., a California general partnership
KMEX License Partnership, G.P., a California general partnership
KDTV License Partnership, G.P., a California general partnership
KFTV License Partnership, G.P., a California general partnership
KTVW License Partnership, G.P., a California general partnership
KXLN License Partnership, G.P., a California general partnership
WGBO License Partnership, G.P., a California general partnership
WXTV License Partnership, G.P., a California general partnership
WLTV License Partnership, G.P., a California general partnership
KUVS License Partnership, G.P., a California general partnership
KUVI License Partnership, G.P., a California general partnership
The Univision Network Limited Partnership
Galavision, Inc.
Sunshine Acquisition Limited Partnership
Sunshine Acquisition Corp.
Univision Online, Inc.
Vision Latina, S.A. de C.V.
Notivision, S.A. de C.V.
UNLP Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
The UNLP Representative Office Without Income
Univision - EV Holdings, LLC
Univision Sports, LLC
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00344-CR

EX PARTE 

JAIME ALVAREZ RAMIREZ

------------

FROM COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered “Appellant=s Motion To Withdraw Notice Of Appeal 

And To Dismiss Appeal As Being Moot.” The motion complies with rule 42.2(a) 

of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). No decision of this 

court having been delivered before we received this motion, we grant the motion 

and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f).

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: September 13, 2012
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 23.2


                                        
                               Auditors' Consent
                               -----------------



The Board of Directors
 Wilsons Center, Inc.:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-29837) on Form S-8 of Wilsons The Leather Experts Inc. of our report dated
July 19, 1996, relating to the consolidated statements of operations,
shareholders' equity, and cash flows of Wilsons Center, Inc. d/b/a Wilsons The
Leather Experts (a subsidiary of Melville Corporation) and Subsidiaries for the
five-month period ended May 25, 1996 and for the year ended December 31, 1995,
which report appears in the January 31, 1998 annual report on Form 10-K of
Wilsons The Leather Experts Inc.



                                    KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Minneapolis, Minnesota
April 8, 1998
CHRO - CHERRY CREEKLatitude: 42.598Longitude: -122.095Elevation: None

CHRO - Cherry Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Cold Springs Camp Site Page...



Cold Springs Camp

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Fourmile Lake Site Page...



Fourmile Lake

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Sevenmile Marsh Site Page...



Sevenmile Marsh
# C_2009148EN.01000801.xml

| 30.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/8

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5152 — Posten AB/Post Danmark A/S)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 148/03

On 21 April 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5152. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5152. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report of American Metal & Technology, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Chen Gao, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date:   August 9 , 2010
By:
/s/ Chen GaoName: Chen GaoTitle: Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
#### Clerk v Clerk.

—Motion is (1) denied wherein it seeks reargument or leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, and (2) granted, wherein it seeks clarification, to the extent of adding the following after the word "respondent”, occurring both in the fourth line of the decretal paragraph of the aforesaid order and in the eleventh line of the first paragraph of the first page of the memorandum decision [132 AD2d 456] accompanying such order: "which property shall be transferred to her free of all mortgages and encumbrances, provided, however, that respondent shall retain title to all personalty located thereat”. [The remainder of the language in such decretal paragraph is unchanged.] Murphy, P. J., Sandler, Sullivan, Rosenberger and Smith, JJ.
H. R. 2137 

One Hundred Fourteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and sixteen 

An Act 

To ensure Federal law enforcement officers remain able to ensure their own safety, 

and the safety of their families, during a covered furlough. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Law Enforcement SelfDefense and Protection Act of 2015’’. 

SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

Congress finds the following: 

(1) Too often, Federal law enforcement officers encounter 

potentially violent criminals, placing officers in danger of grave 

physical harm. 

(2) In 2012 alone, 1,857 Federal law enforcement officers 

were assaulted, with 206 sustaining serious injuries. 

(3) From 2008 through 2011, an additional 8,587 Federal 

law enforcement officers were assaulted. 

(4) Federal law enforcement officers remain a target even 

when they are off-duty. Over the past 3 years, 27 law enforcement officers have been killed off-duty. 

(5) It is essential that law enforcement officers are able 

to defend themselves, so they can carry out their critical missions and ensure their own personal safety and the safety 

of their families whether on-duty or off-duty. 

(6) These dangers to law enforcement officers continue 

to exist during a covered furlough. 

SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS. 

In this Act— 

(1) the term ‘‘agency’’ means each authority of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the 

United States; 

(2) the term ‘‘covered Federal law enforcement officer’’ 

means any individual who— 

(A) is an employee of an agency; 

(B) has the authority to make arrests or apprehensions 

for, or prosecute, violations of Federal law; and 

(C) on the day before the date on which the applicable 

covered furlough begins, is authorized by the agency 

employing the individual to carry a firearm in the course 

of official duties; 
H. R. 2137—2 

(3) the term ‘‘covered furlough’’ means a planned event 

by an agency during which employees are involuntarily furloughed due to downsizing, reduced funding, lack of work, 

or any budget situation including a lapse in appropriations; 

and 

(4) the term ‘‘firearm’’ has the meaning given that term 

in section 921 of title 18, United States Code. 

SEC. 4. PROTECTING FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS WHO 

ARE SUBJECTED TO A COVERED FURLOUGH. 

During a covered furlough, a covered Federal law enforcement 

officer shall have the same rights to carry a firearm issued by 

the Federal Government as if the covered furlough was not in 

effect, including, if authorized on the day before the date on which 

the covered furlough begins, the right to carry a concealed firearm, 

if the sole reason the covered Federal law enforcement officer was 

placed on leave was due to the covered furlough. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Antwoyne L. WYATT, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 06-8026.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 31, 2007.

Decided: June 5, 2007.

Antwoyne L. Wyatt, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, Office of the United *371States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Antwoyne L. Wyatt seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appeal-ability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Wyatt has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Blount International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Calvin E.Jenness, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(i)            The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periodsexpressed in the report.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to BlountInternational, Inc. and will be retained by Blount International, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

 

Date: November 6,2009

 

 
| /s/ Calvin E. Jenness      |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
| Calvin E. Jenness          |   |
| Senior Vice President  and |   |
| Chief Financial Officer    |   |

 

----
DUCHESNE RIVER NEAR RANDLETT, UTLatitude: 40.21Longitude: -109.781Elevation: 4757

DUCHESNE RIVER NEAR RANDLETT, UT

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Lakefork #3 Site Page...



Lakefork #3

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Spirit Lk Site Page...



Spirit Lk

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Wolf Creek Peak Site Page...



Wolf Creek Peak

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Mountain Home Site Page...



Mountain Home

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Little Red Fox Site Page...



Little Red Fox

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Brown Duck Site Page...



Brown Duck

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Chepeta Site Page...



Chepeta

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Currant Creek Site Page...



Currant Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Daniels-Strawberry Site Page...



Daniels-Strawberry

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Five Points Lake Site Page...



Five Points Lake

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Lakefork Basin Site Page...



Lakefork Basin

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Wilbur Bench Site Page...



Wilbur Bench

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Lakefork #1 Site Page...



Lakefork #1

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Mosby Mtn. Site Page...



Mosby Mtn.

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Rock Creek Site Page...



Rock Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Strawberry Divide Site Page...



Strawberry Divide

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Trial Lake Site Page...



Trial Lake

Courtesy NRCS - Go to White River #1 Site Page...



White River #1
#### BRAINE, Appellant, v. ROSSWOG, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July, 1896.)

Action by Mary Braine against Julie Rosswog.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
#### Lois SAYER, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMSOUTH INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC., Amsouth Bank, Defendants, Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 06-15813.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

June 28, 2007.

Wilson Franklin Green, Battle, Fleenor, Green, Winn & Clemmer, LLP, Birmingham, AL, Joseph H. Aughtman, Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles, P.C., Montgomery, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Ivan B. Cooper, E. Glenn Waldrop, Jr., Wynn M. Shuford, Lightfoot, Frankin *&*White, LLC, Birmingham, AL, for Defendanb-Appellee.

Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, HULL and FORRESTER,* Circuit Judges.

*

 Honorable J. Owen Forrester, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Georgia, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

After review and oral argument, we find no reversible error in the district court’s grant of Defendant-Appellee’s motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment in favor of DefendantAppellee.

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit
      8**




List
      of Subsidiaries*




The
      Blue
      Square Chain Investments & Properties Ltd.




The
      Blue
      Square Chain (Hyper Hyper) Ltd.




Blue
      Square Real Estate Ltd.




Eden
      Teva
      Briut Market Ltd.




Bee
      Group
      Retail Ltd. (formerly known as Hamachsan Hamerkazi Kfar Hasha’ashuim
      Ltd.).




Vardinon
      Textile Ltd.




Naaman
      Porcelain Ltd.




Diners
      Club Israel Ltd.




Radio
      Non
      Stop Ltd.





*All
      of
      our subsidiaries are incorporated in Israel
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

211 CA 16-00916 PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, CURRAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

JANINE GALLO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V ORDER
SCOTT T. WICKS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

LAW OFFICES OF JOHN TROP, ROCHESTER (THOMAS P. DURKIN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
LAW OFFICE OF J. MICHAEL HAYES, BUFFALO (DEANNA RUSSELL OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John A. Michalek, J.), entered March 21, 2016. The order, among other things, granted the motion of plaintiff for a directed verdict on liability.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: February 3, 2017 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
NEW FORK NEAR BIG PINEYLatitude: 42.567Longitude: -109.93Elevation: 6809

NEW FORK NEAR BIG PINEY

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Pocket Creek Site Page...



Pocket Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Big Sandy Opening Site Page...



Big Sandy Opening

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Elkhart Park G.S. Site Page...



Elkhart Park G.S.

Courtesy NRCS - Go to New Fork Lake Site Page...



New Fork Lake
#### CALLAN, Appellant, v. CALLAN, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

September 29, 1896.)

Action by William Callan against Margaret Callan.

No opinion. Judgment modified by reducing the recovery to $30, with costs in courts below, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs to either party of this appeal. All concur.
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of R&G Financial Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the undersigneds best
knowledge and belief: (a) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated this 16th day of March, 2005. R&G FINANCIAL CORPORATION/S/  VíCTOR J.
GALÁNVíctor J. GalánChief Executive Officer/S/  JOSEPH R. SANDOVALJoseph R. SandovalChief Financial Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2061 

AN ACT 

To amend section 5000A of the Internal Revenue Code of 

1986 to provide an additional religious exemption from 

the individual health coverage mandate, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2061 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Equitable Access to 

3 Care and Health Act’’ or the ‘‘EACH Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL RELIGIOUS EXEMPTION FROM 

5 HEALTH COVERAGE RESPONSIBILITY RE6 QUIREMENT. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5000A(d)(2)(A) of the In8 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as fol9 lows: 

10 ‘‘(A) RELIGIOUS CONSCIENCE EXEMP11 TIONS.— 

12 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—Such term shall 

13 not include any individual for any month if 

14 such individual has in effect an exemption 

15 under section 1311(d)(4)(H) of the Patient 

16 Protection and Affordable Care Act which 

17 certifies that— 

18 ‘‘(I) such individual is a member 

19 of a recognized religious sect or divi20 sion thereof which is described in sec21 tion 1402(g)(1), and is adherent of 

22 established tenets or teachings of such 

23 sect or division as described in such 

24 section; or 

25 ‘‘(II) such individual is a member 

26 of a religious sect or division thereof 
3 

•HR 2061 EH

1 which is not described in section 

2 1402(g)(1), who relies solely on a reli3 gious method of healing, and for 

4 whom the acceptance of medical 

5 health services would be inconsistent 

6 with the religious beliefs of the indi7 vidual. 

8 ‘‘(ii) SPECIAL RULES.— 

9 ‘‘(I) MEDICAL HEALTH SERVICES

10 DEFINED.—For purposes of this sub11 paragraph, the term ‘medical health 

12 services’ does not include routine den13 tal, vision and hearing services, mid14 wifery services, vaccinations, nec15 essary medical services provided to 

16 children, services required by law or 

17 by a third party, and such other serv18 ices as the Secretary of Health and 

19 Human Services may provide in im20 plementing section 1311(d)(4)(H) of 

21 the Patient Protection and Affordable 

22 Care Act. 

23 ‘‘(II) ATTESTATION REQUIRED.— 

24 Clause (i)(II) shall apply to an indi25 vidual for months in a taxable year 
4 

•HR 2061 EH

1 only if the information provided by 

2 the individual under section 

3 1411(b)(5)(A) of such Act includes an 

4 attestation that the individual has not 

5 received medical health services dur6 ing the preceding taxable year.’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

9 December 31, 2013. 

10 (c) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in the amendment 

11 made by subsection (a) shall preempt any State law re12 quiring the provision of medical treatment for children, 

13 especially those who are seriously ill. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 28, 

2015. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2061 

AN ACT 

To amend section 5000A of the Internal Revenue 

mandate, and for other purposes. exemption from the individual health coverage Code of 1986 to provide an additional religious
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 171 (Wednesday, September 8, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 50354]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19494]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Friday, September 17, 2021.

PLACE: This meeting will be conducted through a videoconference 
involving all Commissioners. Any person wishing to listen to the 
proceeding may call the number listed below.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the 
following in open session: Secretary of Labor v. Consol Pennsylvania 
Coal Co., LLC, Docket No. PENN 2019-0094 (Issues include whether the 
Judge erred in concluding that the location of a lifeline violated a 
safety standard and constituted an S&S violation.).
    Any person attending this meeting who requires special 
accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 
interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. 
Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Emogene Johnson, (202) 434-9935/
(202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.
    Phone Number for Listening to Meeting: 1-(866) 236-7472.
    Passcode: 678-100.
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

    Dated: September 3, 2021.
Sarah L. Stewart,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2021-19494 Filed 9-3-21; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6735-01-P