In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19-0715V 

(not to be published)

RILEY SCHUBERT,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: June 24, 2022

Special Processing Unit (SPU); 

Attorney’s Fees and Costs

Diana Lynn Stadelnikas, Maglio Christopher & Toale, PA, Sarasota, FL, for Petitioner.

Ronalda Elnetta Kosh, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION ON ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS1

On May 15, 2019, Riley Schubert2 filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.3 (the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered injuries, including vasovagal syncope

resulting in hearing loss from a temporal skull fracture, as a result of a human

papillomavirus vaccine he received on September 12, 2016. (Petition at 1). On December 

1 Because this unpublished Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am 

required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the EGovernment Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic 

Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the 

internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact 

medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. 

If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from 

public access.

2 The petition was originally filed by Anne Schubert on behalf of Riley Schubert, as Riley Schubert was a

minor at the time the petition was filed.

3 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease 

of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa 

(2012).
2

23, 2021, a decision was issued awarding compensation to Petitioner based on the 

parties’ stipulation. (ECF No. 56).

Petitioner has now filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs, dated May 11, 2022, 

(ECF No. 61), requesting a total award of $92,304.17 (representing $91,415.80 in fees 

and $888.37 in costs). In accordance with General Order No. 9, Petitioner filed a signed 

statement indicating that Petitioner incurred no out-of-pocket expenses. (ECF No. 61-3). 

Respondent reacted to the motion on May 25, 2022, indicating that he is satisfied the 

statutory requirements for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs are met in this case, 

deferring resolution of the amount to be awarded to my discretion. (ECF No. 62). 

Petitioner filed a reply on May 26, 2022, requesting the fees and costs be awarded in full. 

(ECF No. 63).

I have reviewed the billing records submitted with Petitioner’s request. In my 

experience, the request appears reasonable, and I find no cause to reduce the requested 

hours or rates. 

The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs. Section

15(e). Accordingly, I hereby GRANT Petitioner’s Motion for attorney’s fees and costs. I 

award a total of $92,304.17 (representing $91,415.80 in fees and $888.37 in costs) as a 

lump sum in the form of a check jointly payable to Petitioner and Petitioner’s counsel. Per 

Petitioner’s request, the check should be forward to Maglio Christopher & Toale, 

1605 Main Street, Suite 710, Sarasota Florida 34236. In the absence of a timely-filed 

motion for review (see Appendix B to the Rules of the Court), the Clerk shall enter 

judgment in accordance with this decision.4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master

4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by filing a joint notice 

renouncing their right to seek review.