alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
734 A.2d 1285

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant, v. Curtis GRAY, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Submitted Aug. 3, 1999.

Decided Sept. 9, 1999.

Joseph C. Madenspacher, District Attorney, Susan E. Moyer, Asst. District Attorney, for Com.

James J. Karl, Chief Public Defender, for Curtis Gray.

Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN, and SAYLOR, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Based upon our disposition in *Commonwealth v. Williams,*557 Pa. 285, 733 A.2d 593 (1999), we affirm the Order of the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas dated January 07, 1999. Furthermore, we remand the matter to the common pleas court for disposition of any remaining issues.

Jurisdiction is relinquished.
#### BALDWIN, Respondent,, v. HEWLETT, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 27, 1896.)

Action by Jesse Baldwin against Samuel M. Hewlett.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1991 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1991

   To extend the authority of the Secretary of the Interior and the 
  Secretary of Agriculture to carry out the Federal Lands Recreation 
                Enhancement Act, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 23, 2015

   Mr. Bishop of Utah (for himself and Mr. Grijalva) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 
   Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a 
 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the authority of the Secretary of the Interior and the 
  Secretary of Agriculture to carry out the Federal Lands Recreation 
                Enhancement Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement 
Act Extension Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY UNDER FEDERAL LANDS RECREATION 
              ENHANCEMENT ACT.

    Section 810 of the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act (16 
U.S.C. 6809) is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 810. SUNSET PROVISION.

    ``The authority of the Secretary to carry out this title shall 
terminate on September 30, 2017.''.
                                 <all>
```
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1894 

To authorize the extension of preferential tariff treatment for certain textile 

goods imported from Morocco. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 20, 2015 

Mr. CARNEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To authorize the extension of preferential tariff treatment 

for certain textile goods imported from Morocco. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TARIFF PREFERENCE LEVEL 

4 PROGRAM FOR MOROCCO. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—U.S. Note 64(b) to subchapter 

6 XII of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 

7 the United States is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘shall be as follows:’’ and all 

9 that follows through ‘‘As used in this note’’ and in10 serting ‘‘shall be 10,000,000 SME for each of the 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1894 IH

1 calendar years 2016 through 2025. As used in this 

2 note’’; and 

3 (2) by striking ‘‘December 31, 2015’’ and in4 serting ‘‘December 31, 2025’’. 

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

6 this section shall apply with respect to articles entered, 

7 or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

8 January 1, 2016. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Flaming Gorge Technical Working Group

June 1, 2013, 12:00 pm

Conference Call Record 

Attending:

Reclamation: Heather Hermansen, Dave Speas

Fish and Wildlife Service: Kevin McAbee

Western Area Power Administration: Jerry Wilhite

Recovery Program: Tom Chart, Kevin Bestgen

UDWR: Matt Breen

Agenda:

• Hydrology in the Yampa Rivers

• Stewart Lake update

Hydrology: 

Heather Hermansen reported that Yampa River flows were decreasing. There was a potential for flows 

to decrease below 4,000 cfs and she would watch that carefully. If flows dropped below 8,300 cfs at 

Jensen, Utah, Reclamation would open the bypass tubes to augment Yampa River flows.

Stewart Lake Update:

Matt Breen indicated that Bruce Haines verified samples in the razorback sucker traps at Stewart Lake. 

There are 23 traps at Stewart Lake, 12 had razorback sucker. Some of the traps had single digits of 

razorback sucker with some containing 20+ razorback, and traps did contain a mix of flannel mouth 

sucker also. They pulled the traps this morning at 11 of 23 had larval fish, some traps exceeded 30 

larvae. Matt reported that the traps were distributed throughout the floodplain located as far as where 

the water was spreading into grassy area. The weirs are working and there was some surprise that the 

weirs didn’t contain has many nonnatives as they originally projected. The gate structure still has steady 

inflow and the gates remain open. However, UDWR sees no benefit to keeping the gates open after 

they see negative flow from the wetland. As flows decrease, wetlands other than Stewart Lake will 

continue to see benefit, but UDWR indicated they would not keep the gates open. UDWR will definitely 

be ready to reopen the gate if the Yampa River increases above the current wetland stage. They are 

waiting until after the gates are closed for the season because once they call on Red Fleet water there is 

the potential to increase the current stage and miss the second Yampa increase. Once the gates have 

been permanently closed, it will take 48 hours after calling to get Red Fleet water. The current 

management strategy is to get as much water as possible from the Yampa River peaks and then 

supplement through the summer with Red Fleet water. Kevin Bestgen indicated that the river stage 

changes are important to the life cycle and entrainment possibilities for razorback. He indicated that 

even at negative flows, the Yampa River increases incrementally and those small increases entrain fish, 

which provides a net benefit. Kevin also recommended discontinuing light trapping if the spatial 

distribution has been documented in order to keep the fish in the wetland. UDWR confirmed that they 

will discontinue light trapping, but will do it again after the gate is permanently closed and Red Fleet 
water was being pumped into Stewart Lake in order to ascertain spatial distribution and numbers of 

entrainment.

Next Meetings:

June 4, 2013 at 10:30 a.m.

June 7, 2013 at 10:00 a.m.
Exhibit 10.4


 


FOLEY TRASIMENE ACQUISITION CORP.


1701 Village Center Circle


Las Vegas, NV 89134


May 22, 2020


 


Cannae Holdings, Inc.

1701 Village Center Circle

Las Vegas, NV 89134


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


This letter will confirm our agreement that,
commencing on the effective date (the “Effective Date”) of the registration statement (the “Registration
Statement”) for the initial public offering (the “IPO”) of the securities of Foley Trasimene
Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) and continuing until the earlier of (i) the completion by the Company
of an initial business combination or (ii) the Company’s liquidation (in each case as described in the Registration Statement)
(such earlier date hereinafter referred to as the “Termination Date”), Cannae Holdings, Inc. (“Cannae
Holdings”) shall take steps directly or indirectly to make available to the Company certain office space, secretarial
and administrative services as may be required by the Company from time to time, situated at 1701 Village Center Circle, Las Vegas,
NV 89134 (or any successor location). In exchange therefore, the Company shall pay Cannae Holdings a sum of $5,000 per month, respectively,
on the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter until the Termination Date. Cannae Holdings hereby agrees that it does
not have any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies that may be set aside in a trust account (the “Trust
Account”) that may be established upon the consummation of the IPO (the “Claim”) and hereby
waives any Claim it may have in the future as a result of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements with the
Company and will not seek recourse against the Trust Account for any reason whatsoever.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	FOLEY TRASIMENE ACQUISITION CORP.
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Michael L. Gravelle
	 	Name:	Michael L. Gravelle
	 	Title:	General Counsel and Corporate Secretary


 


AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:


 


	CANNAE HOLDINGS, INC.
	 
	By:	/s/ Richard L. Cox	 
	Name:	Richard L. Cox
	Title:	Chief Financial Officer
#### SYLVIA FISCHER, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. LEO L. FISCHER, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

*Mr. Sam Weiss*for the petitioner.

*Mr. Richard L. Amster*for the respondent.

April 17, 1961.

Denied.
# L_2009322EN.01003801.xml

| 9.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 322/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 322/38

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 1 December 2009

laying down the conditions of employment of the Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union

(2009/912/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 243 thereof,

Whereas the conditions of employment for the Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union should be laid down,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union shall receive a basic salary equivalent to that of an official of the European Union at grade 16 third step multiplied by 100 %. He or she shall receive the family allowances and other allowances provided for in the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union (1).

He or she shall also be entitled to arrangements for the reimbursement of expenses and for social security fixed by analogy with those provided for in the Staff Regulations and Article 17 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations shall apply to him or her by analogy.

Article 2

The remuneration referred to in the first paragraph of Article 1 shall be subject to the weighting determined by the Council pursuant to Articles 64 and 65 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union for officials employed in Belgium.

Article 3

The Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union shall be entitled to a residence allowance fixed in accordance with Article 4 of Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 2290/77 of 18 October 1977 determining the emoluments of the members of the Court of Auditors (2), and to pension arrangements and a transitional allowance in the case of termination of service fixed by analogy with those provided for in that Regulation.

Article 4

Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 260/68 of 29 February 1968 laying down the conditions and procedure for applying the tax for the benefit of the European Communities (3) shall apply to the Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union.

Article 5

Except where otherwise stated in this Decision, Articles 11 to 14 and Article 17 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union and all the relevant provisions of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, with the exception of Article 52 thereof, shall apply to the Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union.

Article 6

This Decision shall apply from 1 December 2009.

It shall be notified to the Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union by the President of the Council.

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 1 December 2009.

For the Council

The President

B. ASK

---

(1)  Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 (OJ L 56, 4.3.1968, p. 1).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 268, 20.10.1977, p. 1.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 56, 4.3.1968, p. 8.

3

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          11,501
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,915
<ALLOWANCES>                                       700
<INVENTORY>                                     16,282
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,330
<PP&E>                                          15,785
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  50,637
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,216
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            52
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,504
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    50,637
<SALES>                                         12,535
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,535
<CGS>                                            7,527
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,512
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (22)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  22
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,570
<INCOME-TAX>                                       597
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                973
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       973
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .22
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1985 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1985

To prohibit treatment of gray wolves in Washington, Oregon, and Utah as 
              endangered species, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 23, 2015

Mr. Newhouse (for himself, Mr. Walden, and Mr. Stewart) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit treatment of gray wolves in Washington, Oregon, and Utah as 
              endangered species, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pacific Northwest Gray Wolf 
Management Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON TREATMENT OF WOLVES IN WASHINGTON, OREGON, AND 
              UTAH UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT OF 1973.

    (a) In General.--Any wolf in a covered State shall not be treated 
under any status of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 
et seq.), including as an endangered species, a threatened species, an 
essential experimental population, or a nonessential experimental 
population.
    (b) Exclusive Covered State Management Authority.--
            (1) Exclusive state management authority.--Except as 
        provided in paragraph (2), each covered State shall have 
        exclusive authority to manage wolves within the borders of that 
        covered State.
            (2) Protection by covered states.--A covered State may not 
        provide protections to wolves that is greater than the 
        protections that would be provided under the Endangered Species 
        Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) if subsection (a) and 
        paragraph (1) of this subsection did not apply.
            (3) Reimbursement by covered states.--Nothing in this Act 
        precludes any State from reimbursing the owner of livestock for 
        any loss of livestock that results from depredation by wolves, 
        or that derives from wolves, that were introduced into the 
        wild.
    (c) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) State.--The term ``covered State'' means each of the 
        States of Washington, Oregon, and Utah.
            (2) Wolf.--The term ``wolf'' means any species, subspecies, 
        or population segment of Canis lupus.
                                 <all>
```
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2109 

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to conform citizen suits 

under that Act with other existing law, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 29, 2015 

Mr. HUIZENGA of Michigan (for himself, Mrs. LUMMIS, Mr. NEUGEBAUER, 

Mr. COLLINS of Georgia, and Mr. HARDY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently 

determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to conform 

citizen suits under that Act with other existing law, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Endangered Species 

5 Litigation Reasonableness Act’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2109 IH

1 SEC. 2. AWARD OF LITIGATION COSTS TO PREVAILING PAR2 TIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH EXISTING LAW. 

3 Section 11(g)(4) of the Endangered Species Act of 

4 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1540(g)(4)) is amended by striking ‘‘to 

5 any’’ and all that follows through the end of the sentence 

6 and inserting ‘‘to any prevailing party in accordance with 

7 section 2412 of title 28, United States Code.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19D0354. HAESUN PARK-POAPS v. RICHARD C. POAPS.

The parties were divorced in 2014. In 2018, Richard C. Poaps (the “Father”)

filed a petition for modification of child support, parenting time, and visitation.

Haesun Park-Poaps (the “Mother”) counterclaimed for modification of child custody,

modification of child support, and contempt. The trial court entered an order that,

among other things, modified the parenting plan and declined to change custody. The

Mother filed an application for discretionary review from that order.

Under OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (11), direct appeals are permitted from “[a]ll

judgments or orders in child custody cases awarding, refusing to change, or modifying

child custody.” See also Vines v. Vines, 292 Ga. 550, 551 (2) (739 SE2d 374) (2013)

(“Under Georgia law, visitation rights are a part of custody.”). Thus, when the issue

on appeal pertains to child custody, the order is directly appealable. See Voyles v.

Voyles, 301 Ga. 44, 46-47 (799 SE2d 160) (2017). Because the Mother seeks to

challenge the trial court’s child custody and parenting time rulings, the order here may

be appealed directly. See id.

We will grant a timely discretionary application if the lower court’s order is

subject to direct appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (j). Accordingly, this application is

hereby GRANTED. The Mother shall have ten days from the date of this order to file

March 19, 2019
a notice of appeal with the trial court. The clerk of the trial court is DIRECTED to

include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

03/19/2019
EXHIBIT 32



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of

the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Elton Alderman, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Prolong International Corporation (the Company), and Anthony R. Turnbull, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, each certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                                             
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------
|Dated: April 15, 2005 |  | /s/ ELTON ALDERMAN                          
|                      |  | Elton Alderman, Chairman, President         
|                      |  | and Chief Executive Officer                 
|                      |  | (Principal Executive Officer)               
|                      | 
|Dated: April 15, 2005 |  | /s/ ANTHONY R. TURNBULL                     
|                      |  | Anthony R. Turnbull, Controller             
|                      |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### DONNER, Respondent, v. ROCHESTER HERALD PUB. CO., Limited, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 16, 1896.)

Action by John A. Donner against the Rochester Herald Publishing Company, Limited.

No. opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur.