alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 District of Oregon

AUTOMATA PRODUCTIONS, INC., 

3:16-cv-00797-SB

DEEANNA SPICHER, 

DeeAnna Spicher 

16842 SE Stark St. 

Portland, OR 97233 

CROWELL LAW 

CARL D. CROWELL 

943 LIBERTY STREET SE 

PO BOX 923 

SALEM, OR 97308 

05/09/2016 By: s/Sutawnee Sellers, Deputy Clerk

Case 3:16-cv-00797-SB Document 4 Filed 05/09/16 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

u I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

u I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

u I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

u I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

u Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

3:16-cv-00797

0

Case 3:16-cv-00797-SB Document 4 Filed 05/09/16 Page 2 of 2
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tammy L. ELLIS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-12352

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

June 15, 2007.

Angela B. Wright, Tampa, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Peter J. Sholl, United States Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before TJOFLAT, HULL and COX, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Angela B. Wright, counsel for Tammy L. Ellis, in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Ellis’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
PRECEDING FINANICAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,103
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              62
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 4,400
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           8,638
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             8,595
<LOANS>                                        107,262
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (1,081)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 128,444
<DEPOSITS>                                     113,554
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,328
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        552
<COMMON>                                         8,290
<OTHER-SE>                                       (802)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 128,444
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,172
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  140
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    15
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 2,327
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,042
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,045
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,282
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       75
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    251
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         251
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       145
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   0.081
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,050
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               (1,054)
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       48
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              (1,081)
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           (1,081)
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            179
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SEAL 1, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-10217.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 16, 2007 *.

Filed April 19, 2007.

John Joseph Tuchi, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Anders V. Rosenquist, Jr., Esq., Rosenquist & Associates, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Appellant appeals from her guilty-plea conviction and sentence.

Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), appellant’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Appellant did not file a *pro se**738supplemental brief. The Government did not file an answering brief.

We have reviewed the briefs and conducted an independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), and we dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver. *See United States v. Nguyen,*235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2000) (appeal waiver valid when entered into knowingly and voluntarily).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Discussion of Experimental 

Actions to be Considered in 

CY19 and Beyond

June 25, 2018
TWG Standing Responsibilities1

1. “...consult with GCMRC in developing criteria and standards for 

monitoring and research programs...”

2. “...develop resource management questions for the design of 

monitoring and research administered by the [GCMRC]...”

1 TWG Operating Procedures
Experimental Actions

Ripe for discussion

• TMF’s

• Bug flows

• Spring HFE’s

Discussion for a later day

• Fall HFE’s

• Ext. dur. Fall HFE’s

• Proactive Spring HFE’s

• Vegetation treatments

• Mechanical removal in LCR reach

• Tier 1 HBC conservation actions

• LSF’s
TMF’s 

• Resource management questions and monitoring criteria
Bug Flows

• Resource management questions and monitoring criteria
Spring HFE’s 

• Resource management questions and monitoring criteria
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. WR-82,563-01 & WR-82,563-02

EX PARTE ARMANDO FERMIN SOTO, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. W10-19502-(H)A & W10-19503-H(A)

IN CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 1

FROM DALLAS COUNTY 

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex

parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted in two causes

of intoxicated manslaughter, and sentenced to imprisonment for twenty years in each cause.

The trial court signed orders designating issues on July 7, 2014. After 180 days from the day

the writ applications were served on the State, the writ applications were forwarded to this Court.

TEX. R. APP. P. 73.5. 

Applicant has alleged facts which, if true, could entitle him to relief. We remand these
applications to the 204 District Court of Dallas County to allow the trial judge to complete an th

evidentiary investigation and enter findings of fact and conclusions of law. In addition to resolving

the issue of whether Applicant received appropriate notice from the court of appeals, the trial court

shall also obtain a response from appellate counsel to resolve the issues of whether Applicant

received appropriate Anders notice from appellate counsel, and whether the notice advised him

correctly of his opportunity to file a pro se response. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); In

re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 408–09 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008). 

These applications will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. 

The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall

be obtained from this Court. 

Filed: February 4, 2015

Do not publish
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       9,140,842
<SECURITIES>                                29,165,793
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,989,502
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            52,251,493
<PP&E>                                       1,801,719
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              56,700,488
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,270,023
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,890
<OTHER-SE>                                  48,419,575
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                56,700,488
<SALES>                                      5,469,888
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,469,888
<CGS>                                        1,051,508
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,776,420
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                235,406
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,277
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            223,129
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   223,129
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Ave Air Temp                    
csv

      Min Air Temp                    
csv

      Max Air Temp                    
csv

      Ave Dewpoint                    
csv

      Peak Wind Gust                    
csv

      Evapotranspiration, Kimberly-Penman                    
csv

      Evapotranspiration, Asce-Ewri Grass                    
csv

      Evapotranspiration, Asce-Ewri Alfalfa                    
csv

      Precipitation                    
csv

      Wy Precip                    
csv

      Avg Net Radiation                    
csv

      Ave Relative Humidity                    
csv

      Growing Degree Days                    
csv

      Ave Wind Speed                    
csv

      Ave Wind Direction                    
csv

      Wind Run                    
csv

      Precip Accum                    
csv

#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Ave Air Temp                    
json

      Min Air Temp                    
json

      Max Air Temp                    
json

      Ave Dewpoint                    
json

      Peak Wind Gust                    
json

      Evapotranspiration, Kimberly-Penman                    
json

      Evapotranspiration, Asce-Ewri Grass                    
json

      Evapotranspiration, Asce-Ewri Alfalfa                    
json

      Precipitation                    
json

      Wy Precip                    
json

      Avg Net Radiation                    
json

      Ave Relative Humidity                    
json

      Growing Degree Days                    
json

      Ave Wind Speed                    
json

      Ave Wind Direction                    
json

      Wind Run                    
json

      Precip Accum                    
json
EXHIBIT
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION**


**OF**


**CHIEF
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Manhattan
      Pharmaceuticals, Inc. do hereby certify that, to the best of their
      knowledge:




(a)  the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Manhattan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. for the quarter
      ended March 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(b)  information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of Manhattan Pharmaceuticals,
      Inc.







Dated: May 15, 2007
            /s/ Douglas Abel
              Douglas
                Abel
              President
                and Chief Executive OfficerDated: May 15, 2007
            /s/ Michael G.
              McGuinness
              Michael
                G. McGuinness
              Chief
                Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

HORACE MANN INSURANCE COMPANY, 3:15-cv-00164-PK

an Illinois corporation,

ORDER

Plaintiff, 

v. 

 

TRIET TRAN, ROY SEO, and 

YUNJU KANG,

 Defendants.

BROWN, Judge.

Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued Findings and

Recommendation (#63) on March 30, 2016, in which he recommends

this Court grant Plaintiff’s Motion (#59) for Summary Judgment

and declare Plaintiff has no obligation to issue benefits to

Defendants Triet Tran, Roy Seo, and Yunju Kang under the terms of

Plaintiff’s insurance contract, if any, with Yen Thi Ngo. The

matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

 - 1 ORDER

Case 3:15-cv-00164-PK Document 66 Filed 05/02/16 Page 1 of 2
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and

Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its

obligation to review the record de novo. See Dawson v. Marshall,

561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). See also United States v.

Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc). 

Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not

find any error. 

CONCLUSION 

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak’s Findings and

Recommendation (#63). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s

Motion (#59) for Summary Judgment and DECLARES Plaintiff has no

obligation to issue benefits to Tran, Seo, and Kang under the

terms of Plaintiff’s insurance contract, if any, with Ngo.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 2nd day of May, 2016.

/s/ Anna J. Brown

 

ANNA J. BROWN

United States District Judge

 - 2 ORDER

Case 3:15-cv-00164-PK Document 66 Filed 05/02/16 Page 2 of 2
#### AMERICAN FINANCIAL ASSOCIATES, LTD., Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES, Appellee.

Appeal No. 84-1541.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 4, 1985.

Edgar A. Blumenfeld, Chicago, 111., argued for appellant.

M. Susan Burnett, Dept, of Justice, Washington, D.C., argued for appellee. With her on the brief were Richard K. Willard, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director, Washington, D.C.

Before BENNETT, NIES and NEWMAN, Circuit Judges.

BENNETT, Circuit Judge.

American Financial Associates, Ltd. (AFA), appeals that portion of the decision of the United States Claims Court, 5 Cl.Ct. 761 (1984), granting the United States’ motion for summary judgment on the AFA’s claim for payment of $134,066.55 on contract No. N00612-80-D-7004. Having fully considered the record and the submissions of the parties, we affirm on the basis of the thorough and well-reasoned opinion of the court below.

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 173 (Friday, September 10, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 50790]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19505]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer 
Communications Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Taxpayer 
Communications Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer 
Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. This 
meeting will still be held via teleconference.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, October 12, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Conchata Holloway at 1-888-912-1227 or 
214-413-6550.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Communications 
Project Committee will be held Tuesday, October 12, 2021, at 12:00 p.m. 
Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and structure 
of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be made with 
Conchata Holloway. For more information please contact Conchata 
Holloway at 1-888-912-1227 or 214-413-6550, or write TAP Office, 1114 
Commerce Street, Mail Code 1005DAL, Dallas, Texas 75242 or contact us 
at the website: http://www.improveirs.org. The agenda will include 
various IRS issues.

    Dated: September 3, 2021.
Kevin Brown,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2021-19505 Filed 9-9-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Case 3:15-cv-00338-SI Document 7 Filed 04/07/15 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 3:15-cv-00338-SI Document 7 Filed 04/07/15 Page 2 of 2
#### BARMANN, Appellant, v. BATHIER, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

December 2, 1896.)

Action by Peter Barmann against Conrad Bathier.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.
TWG Meeting 

June 30- July 1, 2003 

List of Attachments

No. Attachment Presenter / Author 

1 Attendance Sheets 

2 Feasibility Report 

3a AHCIO Memo 

Flip Chart Notes 

Mary Orton 

3b 

4a 

4b 

4c 

4d 

FY 2004 Budget- Before & After Cuts (rev. 6/28/03 

FY 2004 Budget- Before & After Cuts (dtd.) 

Flip Charts 

GCMRC Salary Information 

4e GCMRC FY2004 Work Plan 

Dennis Kubly/Randy Peterson 

Denny Fenn 

5 Long-range planning PowerPoint Presentation Steve Gloss 

6 Summary of Results from GCD AMP TWG MultiAttribute Evaluation Workshop Josh Korman 

7a Mechanical Removal PowerPoint presentation 

7b Report: Non-native Fish Removal Efforts in Grand 

Canyon: A Proposed Modification to Ongoing 

Activities by Mike Yard and Lew Coggins 

Steve Gloss 

8 FY 2004 Budget- Increase/Decrease Table TWG members