alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>



                                  Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Asta Funding, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Gary Stern, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of
                  the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated
                  result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.

Dated: May 12, 2003



                                                        /s/ Gary Stern
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        Gary Stern
                                                        Chief Executive Officer

This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and has not been filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Asta Funding, Inc. and will be retained by Asta Funding, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2006227EN.01000701.xml

| 21.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 227/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 227/7

---

Acknowledgement receipt of complaint No 2006/4524 — SG(06)A/4107

(2006/C 227/04)

| 1. | The European Commission has registered a complaint about the procedure to set up a public-private company in the City of Valencia, Spain, under No 2006/4524 SG(06)A/4107. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The European Commission has registered a complaint about the procedure to set up a public-private company in the City of Valencia, Spain, under No 2006/4524 SG(06)A/4107.

| 2. | It has received several hundred copies of this complaint. It publishes this acknowledgment of receipt in the Official Journal of the European Communities and on the Europa website (http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/complaints/receipt/index_en.htm) to keep those concerned informed while saving administrative resources. |
| --- | --- |

2.

It has received several hundred copies of this complaint. It publishes this acknowledgment of receipt in the Official Journal of the European Communities and on the Europa website (http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/complaints/receipt/index_en.htm) to keep those concerned informed while saving administrative resources.

Official Journal of the European Communities

| 3. | The Commission will examine the complaint in light of the applicable Community legislation. The complainants will be informed of the results of its investigation and of any follow-up action decided by the Commission through the same means. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Commission will examine the complaint in light of the applicable Community legislation. The complainants will be informed of the results of its investigation and of any follow-up action decided by the Commission through the same means.

| 4. | The Commission will endeavour to take a decision on the case within twelve months of the complaint's date of registration (opening of infringement proceedings or closing without further action). |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Commission will endeavour to take a decision on the case within twelve months of the complaint's date of registration (opening of infringement proceedings or closing without further action).

| 5. | The Commission will protect the complainants' rights by not revealing their identity in its eventual contacts with the authorities of the member state complained of. However, the complainants can authorise the Commission expressly to reveal their identity in any such contacts, if they so wish. |
| --- | --- |

5.

The Commission will protect the complainants' rights by not revealing their identity in its eventual contacts with the authorities of the member state complained of. However, the complainants can authorise the Commission expressly to reveal their identity in any such contacts, if they so wish.

---
ROARING FORK ABOVE LOST MAN CREEK NR ASPENLatitude: 39.12Longitude: -106.62Elevation: None

Roaring Fork above Lost Man Creek nr Aspen

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Chapman Tunnel Site Page...



Chapman Tunnel

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Upper Taylor Site Page...



Upper Taylor

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Brumley Site Page...



Brumley

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Independence Pass Site Page...



Independence Pass
EXHIBIT 10.1


 


AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment
to Employment Agreement (this “Agreement”) is entered into effective May 22, 2020 (the “Effective
Date”), by Matthew Stecker (“Executive”)
and Evolving Systems, Inc. (the “Company”).


 


RECITALS


 


		A.	Executive is currently serving as CEO of Company and Company desires to continue to employ Executive
and to compensate Executive for Executive’s services to the Company; and



 


		B.	Executive continues to wish to be employed by the Company and provide services to the Company in
return for certain compensation;



 


Accordingly, in consideration
of the mutual promises and covenants contained in this Agreement and for other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency
of which is acknowledged, the parties agree to the following Amendment to the Employment Agreement:


 


		1.	Incentive Compensation. Section 3.2 of the Agreement is hereby deleted and replaced in
its entirety with the following (with all capitalized terms having the meaning originally ascribed thereto in the Agreement):



 


		3.2	Incentive Compensation. Executive shall
be eligible for an annual incentive bonus ("Incentive Compensation") of 60% of Executive’s then current base salary
as determined by the Board in its sole discretion, provided that should the Company substantially achieve its base operating plan
as adopted by the Board, the annual incentive amount will be subject to a minimum of 15% of annual base compensation. The minimum
bonus consideration of 15% will be earned if the average attainment relative to the Board approved Plan for Revenue and EBITDA
is at least 100%, subject to a minimum attainment in each of at least 95%. Bonus amounts above the minimum will be determined at
the sole discretion of the Board.



 





	 	 	The Company will pay annual
Incentive Compensation at the time(s) determined by the Company, but in no event later than March 15 of the calendar year following
the year in which Executive’s right to the Incentive Compensation arises.






 


		2.	Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in one or more facsimile, electronic or original counterparts,
each of which shall be deemed an original and both of which together shall constitute the same instrument.



 


		3.	Ratification. All terms and provisions of the Agreement not amended hereby, either expressly or
by necessary implication, shall remain in full force and effect. From and after the date of this Amendment, all references to the
term “Agreement” in this Amendment or the original Agreement shall include the terms contained in this Amendment.



 


[Signature
Page Follows]


 






     


     


    

 


In
Witness Whereof, the parties have executed this Amendment on the day and year first written above.


 





	Company:	 	EXECUTIVE:
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	Evolving
Systems, Inc.	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	
	By:	/s/ DAVID J. NICOL	 	/s/ MATTHEW STECKER
	Name:	DAVID J. NICOL	 	Name:	MATTHEW STECKER
	Title:	Director & Chair of Compensation
Committee	 	Title:	 CEO and Chairman of the Board
**EXHIBIT
      99.8**




CERTIFICATION
      OF ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 40-F


PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


FOR
      THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006





In
      connection with the periodic report of Meridian Gold Company (the “Company”) on
      Form 40F for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Security
      and
      Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Peter C. Dougherty, Vice President,
      Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the
      date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the
      United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:


a)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
                as
                applicable, of the Securities and Exchange Commission Act of 1934,
                and


b)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company
                at the dates and for the periods
                indicated.


A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
      document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
      required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
      by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission.





This
      Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission.





This
      Certification is executed as of March 28, 2007








/s/
              Peter C. DoughertyPeter
                C. DoughertyVice President, Finance and Chief Financial
              Officer
#### Coreen Giammanco Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Joseph Giammanco, Deceased, Respondent, v City of New York et al., Appellants.

Under the rules of this court in effect at the time the plaintiff moved to restore this action to the Trial Calendar, the plaintiff was required to show "(1) the merits of the action; (2) the reasons for the acts or omissions wherefor it was struck from the calendar; and (3) good cause why it should be restored” *(see,*22 NYCRR former 675.5 [b]; *see also, Fluman v ISS Dept. Stores,*100 AD2d 838; *Pirnak v Savino,*96 AD2d 857; *Monacelli v Board of Educ.,*92 AD2d 930). The affidavit of the plaintiff and affirmation of her attorney were not sufficient to sustain this burden because they were conclusory, not based on personal knowledge and unsupported by any corroborative documents or evidence *(see, Harrison v Henderson,*105 AD2d 730; *Rothenberg v Parkway Exterminating Co.,*90 AD2d 497; *Monahan v Fiore,*71 AD2d 914). It was therefore an abuse of discretion to grant the plaintiffs motion. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.
# L_2009283EN.01003901.xml

| 30.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 283/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 283/39

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1028/2009

of 29 October 2009

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Amarene Brusche di Modena (PGI))

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Amarene Brusche di Modena’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Amarene Brusche di Modena’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, this name should be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, this name should be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 October 2009.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 71, 25.3.2009, p. 25.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

ITALY

Amarene Brusche di Modena (PGI)

---
#### FRIENDLY, Respondent, v. PARSONS et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 16, 1896.)

Action by Adolf Friendly against William A. Parsons and others.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur.
#### In the Matter of FFT Senior Communities, Inc., Respondent, v Town of Canandaigua et al., Appellants.

[945 NYS2d 892]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Ontario County (Kenneth R. Fisher, J.), entered December 20, 2010 in a proceeding pursuant to RPTR article 7. The order reduced the tax assessments for petitioner for the years 2006-2007, 2007-2008, and 2008-2009.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Respondents appeal from an order in which Supreme Court reduced the tax assessments of petitioner for the tax years 2006-2007, 2007-2008, and 2008-2009. Both respondents and petitioner presented expert testimony regarding the highest and best use of the property. We note that, in this bench trial, although our authority is as broad as that of the trial court *(see DonVito v State of New York,*182 AD2d 1070, 1071 [1992]), we nevertheless will not disturb the decision of the fact-finding court on appeal unless it is obvious that the court’s conclusions could not have been reached under any fair interpretation of the evidence *(see Farace v State of New York,*266 AD2d 870, 870 [1999]). We conclude that the court properly applied the principles enunciated in *Matter of Miriam Osborn Mem. Home Assn. v Assessor of City of Rye*(80 AD 3d 118 [2010]) with respect to the entrance fees charged by petitioner and that, under the circumstances, there is no reason to disturb the court’s determination with respect to the assessment reductions. Present—Scudder, P.J., Centra, Lindley, Sconiers and Martoche, JJ.
<PAGE>
 
TERRACE HOLDINGS, INC.
================================================================================
EXHIBIT 11
================================================================================
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
 
                                                             March 31,
                                                      ------------------------
<S>                                                   <C>          <C>
                                                       1 9 9 7      1 9 9 6
                                                      ----------   ----------
Fully Diluted:
 Average Shares Outstanding Disregarding Potentially 
  Dilutive Common Stock Purchased Warrants             4,306,400    3,312,500
 
 Assuming Conversion of Warrants [1]                          --           --
                                                      ----------   ----------
 Common Shares Outstanding                             4,306,400    3,312,500
                                                      ==========   ==========
 [Loss] for Fully Diluted Calculations                $ (401,404)  $ (364,387)
                                                      ==========   ==========
 Fully Diluted [Loss] Per Common Share                $     (.09)  $     (.11)
                                                      ==========   ==========
 </TABLE>
[1]  Class A and Class B warrants are excluded from the calculation as they are
considered anti-dilutive. However, if effect was given to the exercise of all
such warrants, common shares outstanding would have been increased by 1,981,250.
COLORADO RIVER AT GRAND LAKE (NORTH FORK)Latitude: 40.219Longitude: -105.858Elevation: 8380

Colorado River at Grand Lake (North Fork)

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Never Summer Site Page...



Never Summer

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Lake Irene Site Page...



Lake Irene

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Phantom Valley Site Page...



Phantom Valley

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Stillwater Creek Site Page...



Stillwater Creek
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rubin Velasquez, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from *353a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Finnegan, J.), rendered August 2, 1984, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Weinstein and Spatt, JJ., concur.
#### Woodruff *et al.*v. Stough.

Appeal from Crenshaw Chancery Court.

Heard before the Hon. Jure N. Williams.

D. M. Powell, for appellant.

J. C. Richardson, for appellee.

The bill in this case was filed by the appellee against the appellants. 'The facts of the case and the purpose of the bill are set forth in the report of the case on the former appeal, as found in 107 Ala. 314.

On the final submission of the cause on the pleadings and proof, the chancellor decreed that the complainant was entitled to the relief prayed for -and ordered accordingly. The defendants appeal from this decree and assign the rendition thereof as error.

*710Tlie decree of tlie chancellor is affirmed on the authority of *Woodruff v. Sbouyh,*107 Ala. 314.

Opinion by

Dowdell, J.
#### Owen F. Burns III et al., Appellants, v James R. Varriale Jr., Defendant, and St. Paul/Travelers Insurance Company, Respondent. (And a Related Proceeding.)

Submitted May 14, 2007;

decided June 5, 2007

Motion by Injured Workers’ Bar Association for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed.
datetime,flow volume2015-05-20,975.61348
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains audited summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheet, and the statements of operation and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such audited financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-1996
<CASH>                                       1,305,130
<SECURITIES>                                 4,265,862
<RECEIVABLES>                                  343,493
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (28,200)
<INVENTORY>                                    272,261
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,605,743
<PP&E>                                       8,508,424
<DEPRECIATION>                               (892,080)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,173,221
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,308,253
<BONDS>                                         57,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        46,675
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,628,158
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,173,221
<SALES>                                     10,864,863
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,536,850
<CGS>                                        3,749,471
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,451,179
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                85,691
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                13,200
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              85,691
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                999,980
<INCOME-TAX>                                   269,714
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            730,266
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   730,266
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17
        

</TABLE>
#### Yale-New Haven Hospital *v.*William Matthews et al.

*Bruce A. Morrison,*in support of the motion.

Submitted March 12

decided March 19, 1975

The defendants’ motion for leave to amend his petition for certification pursuant to § 746 of the Practice Book is granted.
#### Jason Burlew et al., Plaintiffs and Richard Katchuk, Respondent, v Talisman Energy USA Inc., Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

[945 NYS2d 587]

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Smith, J.P., Carni, Bindley and Sconiers, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1140

RENE RAMSEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

THE VILLA JOINT RETIREMENT CONVENT, INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge.

(CA-98-1481-WMN)

Submitted: June 17, 1999 Decided: June 24, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rene Ramsey, Appellant Pro Se. Saul E. Gilstein, Latonya B. Dargan,

GALLAGHER, EVELIUS & JONES, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Rene Ramsey appeals the district court’s order granting the

Appellee’s motion for summary judgment and denying his motion for

summary judgment in his Title VII action claiming discrimination

based upon his race and gender. We have reviewed the record and

the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Ramsey

v. The Villa Joint Retirement Convent, Inc., No. CA-98-1481-WMN (D.

Md. Jan. 12, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED