alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001001188
<NAME> CARNEGIE GROUP, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                      13,841,553
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,396,485
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            25,927,448
<PP&E>                                       2,726,594
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,278,691
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,177,848
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        66,900
<OTHER-SE>                                  25,033,943
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,278,691
<SALES>                                        845,957
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,933,636
<CGS>                                       14,108,375
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,302,106
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,295
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,044,826
<INCOME-TAX>                                   812,980
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,231,846
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,231,846
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### BENEDICT v. ARNOUX et al.

(Supreme' Court, Appellate Division. First Department.

November 13, 1896.)

Action by Elias C. Benedict against George T. Arnoux and another.

No opinion. Motion dismissed by default. See 38 N. Y. Supp. 882, and 39 N. Y. Supp. 793.
EXHIBIT 31.2

           CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14 AND 15d-14
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Julie Seaman, Chief Financial Officer of US Global Nanospace, Inc. (the
"Company"), certify that:

      I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of US Global
Nanospace, Inc.

      Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report.

      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in the report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
and for, the periods, presented in the report.

      The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 15(e) and 15d-1415(e)) for the Company and have:

            (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which the periodic report is being
prepared;

            (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

            (c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Company's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting;
and

      The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Company's auditors and to the audit committee of the Company's board of
directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent function):

            (i) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and

            (ii) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control
over financial reporting.

Dated:  November 15, 2004


/s/ Julie Seaman
-----------------------------------
Julie Seaman
Chief Financial Officer
#### Hakob MARTIROSYAN; et al., Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-72475.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 16, 2007.*

Filed April 19, 2007.

James L. Rosenberg, Esq., Law Offices of James L. Rosenberg, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioners.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Allen W. Hausman, Attorney, San Francisco, CA, U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Hakob Martirosyan, his wife Hasmik, and their three children Ani, Gevorg, and Sargis, all natives and citizens of Armenia, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, *Mansour v. Ashcroft,*390 F.3d 667, 671 (9th Cir.2004), and we deny the petition.

After reviewing the record, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the IJ’s conclusion that the petitioners did not suffer past persecution on account of their religion. *See Gomes v. Gonzales,*429 F.3d 1264, 1267 (9th Cir.2005); *Gormley v. Ashcroft,*364 F.3d 1172, 1177 (9th Cir.2004). Substantial evidence also supports the IJ’s conclusion that they will not experience persecution if they return to Armenia. *See Gormley,*364 F.3d at 1180. Accordingly, their claim for asylum fails. *See id.*

Because the petitioners’ opening brief does not address the IJ’s rulings on their claims for withholding of removal and protection under the CAT, we deem these claims waived. *See Maharaj v. Gonzales,*450 F.3d 961, 967 (9th Cir.2006) (en banc).

PETITION DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7803
RONNIE L. SIMMONS, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
LARRY W. HUFFMAN; DAVID K. SMITH; BOBBY W. SOLES; BARBARA WHEELER; ICC COMMITTEE; S. RALLS; RUFUS FLEMING; STANLEY JONES; CAPTAIN SPEARS; CAPTAIN WOODSON; LIEUTENANT YATES; LIEUTENANT WILSON; LIEUTENANT ELDRIDGE; E. O. TRENT; SERGEANT TONEY; SERGEANT SMITH; SERGEANT PHILLIPS; SERGEANT TERRY; SERGEANT D. STITH, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-93-482-R) Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: February 15, 1996 Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronnie L. Simmons, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court order denying relief on one claim in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. The district court then consolidated Appellant's case with two others for the purpose of a jury trial on the remaining issues. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
1 – ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

TRACY L. GRAHAM,

Petitioner, Civ. No. 1:16-cv-00242-CL

v. ORDER

MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster

General, United States Postal Service,

Respondent.

_____________________________

MCSHANE, Judge:

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 77), 

and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. 

Plaintiff filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation. Accordingly, I have reviewed the 

file of this case de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore 

Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). I find no error and conclude the report is 

correct. Magistrate Judge Clarke’s Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 77) is adopted. 

Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 63) is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s motion for 

summary judgment (ECF No. 65) is DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 16th day of November, 2017.

_____/s/ Michael J. McShane_____

Michael McShane

United States District Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                         572,819
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    136,387
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               743,455
<PP&E>                                         719,753
<DEPRECIATION>                                 590,680
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,176,525
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,004,840
<BONDS>                                      3,007,358
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,393,889
<COMMON>                                    13,701,986
<OTHER-SE>                                (16,862,347)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,176,525
<SALES>                                          7,500
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               114,166
<CGS>                                            5,767
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,870,883
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             412,849
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,169,566)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (447,956)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,721,610)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,721,610)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.55)



</TABLE>
# Instructions

# Significance Table

# Example
NOTICE OF FILING OF APPLICATION TO SUPREME COURT FOR STAY 1

JEFFREY H. WOOD

Acting Assistant Attorney General 

Environment & Natural Resources Division

LISA LYNNE RUSSELL, Chief

GUILLERMO A. MONTERO, Assistant Chief 

SEAN C. DUFFY (NY Bar No. 4103131) 

MARISSA PIROPATO (MA Bar No. 651630)

CLARE BORONOW (admitted to MD bar) 

FRANK J. SINGER (CA Bar No. 227459)

Trial Attorneys

Natural Resources Section 

601 D Street NW 

Washington, DC 20004

(202) 305-0445

sean.c.duffy@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON

EUGENE DIVISION

KELSEY CASCADIA ROSE JULIANA, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 6:15-CV-01517-TC

NOTICE OF FILING OF APPLICATION 

TO THE SUPREME COURT FOR STAY

Defendants, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby give notice of the filing in the

United States Supreme Court of an Application for a Stay Pending Disposition by the United 

States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit of a Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United 

States District Court for the District of Oregon and Any Further Proceedings in This Court and 

Case 6:15-cv-01517-TC Document 321 Filed 07/17/18 Page 1 of 2
NOTICE OF FILING OF APPLICATION TO SUPREME COURT FOR STAY 2

Request for an Administrative Stay (“Application”). A copy of the Application is filed herewith 

as an exhibit to this Notice.

Dated: July 17, 2018 Respectfully submitted,

JEFFREY H. WOOD

Acting Assistant Attorney General

Environment & Natural Resources Division

/s/ Clare Boronow

LISA LYNNE RUSSELL

GUILLERMO A. MONTERO

SEAN C. DUFFY (NY Bar No. 4103131)

MARISSA PIROPATO (MA Bar No. 651630)

CLARE BORONOW (admitted to MD bar)

FRANK J. SINGER (CA Bar No. 227459)

U.S. Department of Justice

Environment & Natural Resources Division

Natural Resources Section

601 D Street NW

Washington, DC 20004

Telephone: (202) 305-0445

Facsimile: (202) 305-0506

sean.c.duffy@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Defendants

Case 6:15-cv-01517-TC Document 321 Filed 07/17/18 Page 2 of 2
Goal 12 High Quality Monitoring, 

Goal 12 High Quality Monitoring, 

TOTAL GOAL 12

$3,263,667

Logistics

$363.9

DASA, $903.1

Support 

Functions, 

$1,996.6
ADMINISTRATIVE SUPP

ADMINISTRATIVE SUPP

Total $1,996,623

Science Symposium, 

$23.8

Admin Operations, 

$296.2

Pro

gram Plannin

g & 

Management, 

$1,059.4

AMWG/TWG TRAVEL, 

$18.0

INDEPENDENT 

REVIEWS, $263.3

System Support, 

$335.6
DASA

Library

$42.3

MAPPING

$115.8

Database Mgt

$178.6

Analog Conversion

$78.7

GIS

$227.5

Remote Sensing

$260.
Logistics Base and Survey Su

Logistics Base and Survey Su

Control Network, 

$134.8

, 

Logistics Base, 

$126.6

Survey Operation, 

$102.4

All Figur
Exhibit 10.86

                  FIRST AMENDMENT TO DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

             WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE DEFERRED COMPENSATION COMMITTEE


The undersigned, being all of the members of the Deferred Compensation Committee
established under the NAB Group USA Deferred  Compensation  Plan, hereby resolve
as follows:

WHEREAS,  Michigan  National  Corporation  ("MNC")  has  established  a separate
deferred compensation plan,

WHEREAS,  MNC desires to transfer all Participants' NAB Plan account balances to
MNC's new plan and cease to be a Participating Employer in this plan,

NOW THEREFORE it is resolved that, effective as of the date below,

1.   Section  1.1 of the Plan shall be amended and  restated in its  entirety as
     follows:

          Establishment and Purpose.  Each Participating  Employer hereby adopts
          -------------------------
     the NAB Group-USA Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Plan"),  effective as of
     February  10, 1998 (the  "Effective  Date").  The purpose of the Plan is to
     provide each  Participant  in the Plan with an opportunity to defer receipt
     of  salary,  bonus,  and other  specified  cash  compensation.  The Plan is
     intended to benefit a "select  group of  management  or highly  compensated
     employees" within the meaning of Sections 201, 301 and 401 of ERISA, and to
     be therefore  exempt from the  requirements of Parts 2, 3, and 4 of Title I
     of ERISA.

2.   Michigan National Corporation shall be removed as a Participating  Employer
     for all purposes under the Plan.


                       Date:  November 14, 2000  /s/
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Kevin Race
                                                 HomeSide, Inc.


                       Date:  November 14, 2000  /s/
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Joe Fritzsche
                                                 Michigan National Corporation
# L_2010341DE.01005201.xml

| 23.12.2010 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 341/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2010

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 341/52

---

Berichtigung des Beschlusses 2009/426/JI des Rates vom 16. Dezember 2008 zur Stärkung von Eurojust und zur Änderung des Beschlusses 2002/187/JI über die Errichtung von Eurojust zur Verstärkung der Bekämpfung der schweren Kriminalität

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 138 vom 4. Juni 2009
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 138 vom 4. Juni 2009

Seite 19, Artikel 9c, Titel:

anstatt:

„Befugnisse, die im Benehmen mit einer zuständigen nationalen Behörde ausgeübt werden“

muss es heißen:

„Befugnisse, die im Einvernehmen mit einer zuständigen nationalen Behörde ausgeübt werden“.

Seite 19, Artikel 9c Absatz 1:

anstatt:

„(1)   Die nationalen Mitglieder können in ihrer Eigenschaft als zuständige nationale Behörde im Benehmen mit einer zuständigen nationalen Behörde oder auf deren Ersuchen im Einzelfall folgende Befugnisse ausüben: ...“

muss es heißen:

„(1)   Die nationalen Mitglieder können in ihrer Eigenschaft als zuständige nationale Behörde im Einvernehmen mit einer zuständigen nationalen Behörde oder auf deren Ersuchen im Einzelfall folgende Befugnisse ausüben: ...“.

Seite 23, Artikel 16b Absatz 2:

anstatt:

„(2)   Das nationale Mitglied entscheidet innerhalb der Grenzen nach Absatz 1, in welchem Umfang in seinem Mitgliedstaat Personen nach Artikel 12 Absatz 2 ...“

muss es heißen:

„(2)   Das nationale Mitglied entscheidet innerhalb der Grenzen nach Absatz 1, in welchem Umfang in seinem Mitgliedstaat Stellen/Personen nach Artikel 12 Absatz 2 ...“.

Seite 24, Artikel 16b Absatz 3:

anstatt:

„(3)   Jeder Mitgliedstaat entscheidet nach Anhörung seines nationalen Mitglieds darüber, in welchem Umfang in diesem Mitgliedstaat Personen nach Artikel 12 Absatz 2 der Zugang zum Index gewährt wird, ...“

muss es heißen:

„(3)   Jeder Mitgliedstaat entscheidet nach Anhörung seines nationalen Mitglieds darüber, in welchem Umfang in diesem Mitgliedstaat Stellen/Personen nach Artikel 12 Absatz 2 der Zugang zum Index gewährt wird, ...“.

Seite 24, Artikel 16b Absatz 3 Unterabsatz 2:

anstatt:

„Personen nach Artikel 12 Absatz 2 haben jedoch, ...“

muss es heißen:

„Stellen/Personen nach Artikel 12 Absatz 2 haben jedoch, ...“.

Seite 30, Artikel 41 Absatz 1 Satz 2:

anstatt:

„(1)   ... Das Generalsekretariat des Rates führt ein laufend aktualisiertes Verzeichnis dieser Personen und macht deren Namen und Kontaktangaben allen Mitgliedstaaten und der Kommission zugänglich.“

muss es heißen:

„(1)   ... Das Generalsekretariat des Rates führt ein laufend aktualisiertes Verzeichnis dieser Stellen/Personen und macht deren Namen und Kontaktangaben allen Mitgliedstaaten und der Kommission zugänglich.“.

---
# L_2009207EN.01000801.xml

| 11.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 207/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 207/8

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 729/2009

of 10 August 2009

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Ciauscolo (PGI))

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Ciauscolo’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Ciauscolo’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, this name should be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, this name should be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 August 2009.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 328, 23.12.2008, p. 38.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.2. —   Meat products (cooked, salted, smoked, etc.)

ITALY

Ciauscolo (PGI)

---