alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2009280EN.01000101.xml

| 27.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 280/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 280/1

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1008/2009

of 26 October 2009

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in particular Article 138(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 27 October 2009.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 October 2009.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.

2

---

ANNEX

Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

| (EUR/100 kg) |
| --- |
| CN code | Third country code (1) | Standard import value |
| 0702 00 00 | MA | 32,1 |
| MK | 22,4 |
| TR | 65,0 |
| ZZ | 39,8 |
| 0707 00 05 | TR | 128,9 |
| ZZ | 128,9 |
| 0709 90 70 | MA | 55,7 |
| TR | 113,5 |
| ZZ | 84,6 |
| 0805 50 10 | AR | 74,5 |
| TR | 65,8 |
| ZA | 76,9 |
| ZZ | 72,4 |
| 0806 10 10 | BR | 218,4 |
| TR | 106,4 |
| US | 238,2 |
| ZZ | 187,7 |
| 0808 10 80 | AU | 182,8 |
| CL | 114,8 |
| MK | 16,1 |
| NZ | 82,4 |
| US | 89,2 |
| ZA | 79,1 |
| ZZ | 94,1 |
| 0808 20 50 | CN | 87,4 |
| ZZ | 87,4 |

(EUR/100 kg)

CN code

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

0702 00 00

MA

32,1

MK

22,4

TR

65,0

ZZ

39,8

0707 00 05

TR

128,9

ZZ

128,9

0709 90 70

MA

55,7

TR

113,5

ZZ

84,6

0805 50 10

AR

74,5

TR

65,8

ZA

76,9

ZZ

72,4

0806 10 10

BR

218,4

TR

106,4

US

238,2

ZZ

187,7

0808 10 80

AU

182,8

CL

114,8

MK

16,1

NZ

82,4

US

89,2

ZA

79,1

ZZ

94,1

0808 20 50

CN

87,4

ZZ

87,4

---

(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
  ZZ
  ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

---
Exhibit 10











CONSENT OF AMEC AMERICAS LIMITED





Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the Annual Report) of Cumberland Resources Ltd. (the Company), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.



We hereby consent to the references to our name under the heading Narrative Description of Business -- Meadowbank Gold Project, Nunavut Territory, Canada in the Companys Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2005 which is included as part of the Annual Report, and to all other references to our name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report, and we further consent to the reliance in the Annual Report on our independent technical reports entitled Meadowbank Resource Estimate dated January 29, 2004,  and Meadowbank Gold Project, Nunavut Technical Report, dated March 31, 2005 which the Company used, or directly quoted from, in preparing summaries concerning the Meadowbank Gold Project, which appear in such Annual Report.



AMEC Americas Limited



By:

/s/ Steve Toevs



Name:

Steve Toevs, CGA

Title:

VP, Finance, Energy and Mining





March 22, 2006
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 21-1261

___________________________

Stacy K. Arnold

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

City of St. Joseph, Missouri; St. Joseph Public Library; Officer Rebecca Hailey, In

her personal and professional capacity

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - St. Joseph

 ____________

 Submitted: September 14, 2021

Filed: September 17, 2021

[Unpublished]

____________

Before ERICKSON, GRASZ, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Stacy Arnold appeals after the district court1

dismissed some of her claims and adversely granted summary judgment as to her

1The Honorable Beth Phillips, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the

Western District of Missouri.
remaining claims. After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on

appeal, we conclude the district court properly determined Arnold lacked standing as

to her claims for declaratory and injunctive relief, see Buckler v. United States, 919

F.3d 1038, 1044 (8th Cir. 2019) (reviewing de novo grant of motion to dismiss under

Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1)); City of Kennett v. EPA, 887 F.3d 424, 430 (8th Cir. 2018)

(reviewing de novo standing determination on summary judgment); and properly

granted summary judgment as to her claims for damages, see McReynolds v. Schmidli,

4 F.4th 648, 652 (8th Cir. 2021) (reviewing de novo grant of summary judgment). 

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
DILLON RESERVOIRLatitude: 39.609Longitude: -106.061Elevation: None

Dillon Reservoir

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Copper Mountain Site Page...



Copper Mountain

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Fremont Pass Site Page...



Fremont Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Grizzly Peak Site Page...



Grizzly Peak

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Hoosier Pass Site Page...



Hoosier Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Loveland Basin Site Page...



Loveland Basin

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Jackwhacker Gulch Site Page...



Jackwhacker Gulch

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Michigan Creek Site Page...



Michigan Creek
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors 

Capital Title Group, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference inthe registration statements Nos. 333-115864 and 333-128609, on Form S-3 and Nos. 333-66375, and 333-112982 on Form S-8, of Capital Title Group, Inc. of our reports dated March 27, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of CapitalTitle Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December31, 2005, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, which reports appear in theDecember 31, 2005, annual report on Form 10-K of Capital Title Group, Inc. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Phoenix, Arizona 

March 27, 2006
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with
the Annual Report of Caraustar Industries, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2002 as submitted
for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Thomas V. Brown, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

|                     |  |                                                      
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 28, 2003 |  |                                                      
|                     |  |                                                      
|                     |  | /s/ Thomas V. Brown                                  
|                     |  |                                                      
|                     |  | Thomas V. Brown
President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Caraustar Industries, Inc. and will be retained by Caraustar
Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S.D.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         262,488
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,928,929
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,360,190
<PP&E>                                      15,349,445
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,206,135
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,932,807
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,455,100
<BONDS>                                      4,004,929
<COMMON>                                     7,495,552
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,852,181
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,932,807
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,098,230
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,903,473
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,114,262
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             134,767
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,946,571
<INCOME-TAX>                                   850,778
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,095,793
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,095,793
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .22
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.1 -Certification of Principal Executive Officer





CERTIFICATION
IN ACCORDANCE WITH


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED BY


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Internet America, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the three months ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William
E. Ladin, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify in accordance
with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, to my knowledge that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.









/s/ William E. Ladin,
      Jr.William
      E. (Billy) Ladin, Jr.Chief
      Executive OfficerDate:
      October 28, 2008








20
#### Stilson *v.*Hagadorn.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department.*

July 1, 1890.)

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1910 

To require the Secretary of the Treasury to convene a panel to solicit 

recommendations for and select a portrait of a woman to be used in 

a redesign of the $20 Federal Reserve note. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 21, 2015 

Mr. GUTIE ́RREZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of the Treasury to convene a panel 

to solicit recommendations for and select a portrait of 

a woman to be used in a redesign of the $20 Federal 

Reserve note. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Put a Woman on the 

5 Twenty Act of 2015’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1910 IH

1 SEC. 2. SELECTION OF A PORTRAIT FOR THE $20 FEDERAL 

2 RESERVE NOTE. 

3 The Secretary of the Treasury shall make such ar4 rangements as are necessary to convene a panel of United 

5 States citizens to solicit recommendations from the public 

6 for a portrait of a woman to be used in a redesign of the 

7 $20 Federal Reserve note. The panel shall submit a rec8 ommendation to the Secretary of the Treasury on a date 

9 determined by the Secretary. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Reclamation Storage                    
csv

      Riogrande Storage                    
csv

      Santafecity Storage                    
csv

      Totalsjc Storage                    
csv

      Totalsjc Ave Sjc Release                    
csv

      Riogrande Ave Rg Release                    
csv

      Reclamation Ave Sjc Release                    
csv

      Santafecity Ave Sjc Release                    
csv

      Abiquiu Storage                    
csv

      Abiquiu Total Release                    
csv

#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Reclamation Storage                    
json

      Riogrande Storage                    
json

      Santafecity Storage                    
json

      Totalsjc Storage                    
json

      Totalsjc Ave Sjc Release                    
json

      Riogrande Ave Rg Release                    
json

      Reclamation Ave Sjc Release                    
json

      Santafecity Ave Sjc Release                    
json

      Abiquiu Storage                    
json

      Abiquiu Total Release                    
json
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATIONS


OF


PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Manhattan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. does hereby certify that, to the best of his knowledge:


(a)      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Manhattan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(b)      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Manhattan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.





Dated: May 16, 2011
/s/ Michael G. McGuinnessMichael G. McGuinnessPrincipal Executive and Financial Officer
#### D. V. Frione and Company, Inc. *v.*Harbor Construction Corporation et al.

House, C. J., Loiselle, MacDonald, Bogdanski and Longo, Js.

Argued April 2

decision released April 22, 1975

*William F. Gallagher,*with whom, on the brief, was *John T. Cummiskey, Jr.,*for the appellant (named defendant).

*Howard F. Zoarski,*for the appellee (defendant Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company).

*Joseph B. Morse*appeared for the plaintiff.

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff sought a judgment of interpleader to determine claims to a fund held by it for the defendant Harbor Construction Corporation, hereinafter Harbor, arising out of a judgment rendered against the plaintiff in favor of Harbor. See *Harbor Construction Corporation*v. *D. V. Frione & Co.,*158 Conn. 14, 225 A.2d 823.

On December 5, 1973, the referee, acting as the court, rendered judgment of interpleader, ordering the plaintiff to pay the claims of some of the defend*387ants, including those of Harbor and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, hereinafter Hartford A. & I., the parties to this appeal.

By motion filed April 9, 1974, Harbor moved to open and set aside the judgment of December 5, 1973. A motion to erase, filed on April 11, 1974, by Hartford A. & I. was granted by the court on the ground that it lacked jurisdiction because the motion to open and set aside the judgment was filed after the expiration of the term in which the judgment had been rendered. Harbor has appealed to this court from the granting of the motion to erase.

The decisions of this court in *Poneleit*v. *Dudas,*141 Conn. 413, 106 A.2d 479, and *Cichy*v. *Kostyk,*143 Conn. 688, 125 A.2d 483, are dispositive of the merits of this appeal. As the *Poneleit*case reiterated (p. 416), “‘It is well settled that, unless proceedings looking to modification of a judgment are started before the expiration of the term of court at which it was entered, a court has no power to modify it in matters of substance, as distinguished from the correction of clerical errors, after the expiration of the term, except by consent or waiver of the parties or in proceedings for a new trial,’ ” and added, “As the term of court during which the judgment was rendered had expired at the time the motion to open the judgment was filed, the trial court did not have the power to grant it.” See also *Beard*v. *Beard,*168 Conn. 53, 54, 357 A.2d 465. The *Cichy*case (p. 695) makes clear that there is no merit to Harbor’s contention that since the motion to open — ■ filed after the expiration of the statutory “session” —-was filed before the expiration of the statutory “term,” the court erred in granting the motion to erase.

There is no error.
#### Mayor of the City of New York, Appellant, v Council of the City of New York, Respondent. Lillian Roberts, as Executive Director of District Council 37, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, et al., Intervenors-Respondents.

Submitted March 12, 2007;

decided March 22, 2007

Motion by New York Conference of Mayors and Municipal Officials for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted. Two copies of the brief may be served and 24 copies filed within seven days.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7565

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DAVID HOWARD POSEY, a/k/a David Allen Stern,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CR-97-302-A, CA-98-1326)

Submitted: February 23, 1999 Decided: March 24, 1999

Before LUTTIG and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Howard Posey, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Gursky Sorkin, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

David Howard Posey seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Posey’s

motion for appointment of counsel, deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. See United States v. Posey, Nos. CR-97-302-A; CA-98-1326

(E.D. Va. Sept. 25, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit
4.10


 


Description
of the Registrant’s Securities


Registered
Pursuant to Section 12 of the


Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.


 


As
of May 29, 2020, Transportation and Logistics Systems, Inc. has one class of securities registered under Section 12
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), its Common Stock.


 


The
following is a summary of information concerning capital stock of Transportation and Logistics Systems, Inc. (the “Company”).
The summaries and descriptions below do not purport to be complete statements of the relevant provisions of the Company’s
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, (the “Charter”) and Bylaws of the Company (the
“By-Laws”), and are entirely qualified by these documents.


 


Common
Stock


 


Authorized
Shares. The Company is authorized
to issue up to 500 million shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”).


 


Dividends. Subject
to the rights of holders of outstanding shares of Preferred Stock, if any, the holders of Common Stock are entitled to receive
dividends, if any, as may be declared from time to time by the Board of Directors in its discretion out of funds legally available
for the payment of dividends.


 


Voting
Rights. Each share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote per share on matters voted on by the stockholders.


 


Liquidation
Rights. Subject to any preferential rights of outstanding shares of Preferred Stock, holders of Common Stock will share ratably
in all assets legally available for distribution to our stockholders in the event of dissolution. As of May 29, 2020, holders
of 1,700,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock have the right to receive a liquidation preference equal to $0.001 per share prior
to any distribution or payment to the holders of the Common Stock. Thereafter, holders of Series B Preferred Stock share ratably
with the holders of Common Stock in all assets legally available for distribution to our stockholders in the event of dissolution
on a 1-for-1 as converted to Common Stock basis.


 


Other
Rights. The shares of Common Stock are not subject to redemption by operation of a sinking fund or otherwise.
Holders of shares of Common Stock are not currently entitled to pre-emptive rights.


 


Fully
Paid. The issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock are fully paid and non-assessable. This means the full
purchase price for the outstanding shares of Common Stock has been paid and the holders of such shares will not be assessed any
additional amounts for such shares.


 


Listing. The
Common Stock is quoted on the OTC Pink market under the symbol “TLSS”.