alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010351EN.01000901.xml

| 22.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 351/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 351/9

---

Statement of revenue and expenditure for the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights for the financial year 2010 — Amending Budget No 1

(2010/C 351/03)

REVENUE

| Title
  Chapter | Heading | Budget 2010 | Amending budget No 1 | New amount |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2 |
| EUROPEAN COMMUNITY SUBSIDY |
| 2 0 | EUROPEAN COMMUNITY SUBSIDY | 20 000 000 | 90 010 | 20 090 010 |
| | Title 2 — Total | 20 000 000 | 90 010 | 20 090 010 |
| 3 |
| FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTION OF THE HOST MEMBER STATE |
| | Title 3 — Total | p.m. | | p.m. |
| 4 |
| REVENUE ASSIGNED TO SPECIFIC ITEMS OF EXPENDITURE |
| | Title 4 — Total | 2 420 | | 2 420 |
| 9 |
| MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE |
| | Title 9 — Total | p.m. | | p.m. |
| | GRAND TOTAL | 20 002 420 | 90 010 | 20 092 430 |

Title

Chapter

Heading

Budget 2010

Amending budget No 1

New amount

2

2

EUROPEAN COMMUNITY SUBSIDY

EUROPEAN COMMUNITY SUBSIDY

2 0

EUROPEAN COMMUNITY SUBSIDY

20 000 000

90 010

20 090 010

Title 2 — Total

Title 2 — Total

20 000 000

20 000 000

90 010

90 010

20 090 010

20 090 010

3

3

FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTION OF THE HOST MEMBER STATE

FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTION OF THE HOST MEMBER STATE

Title 3 — Total

Title 3 — Total

p.m.

p.m.

p.m.

p.m.

4

4

REVENUE ASSIGNED TO SPECIFIC ITEMS OF EXPENDITURE

REVENUE ASSIGNED TO SPECIFIC ITEMS OF EXPENDITURE

Title 4 — Total

Title 4 — Total

2 420

2 420

2 420

2 420

9

9

MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE

MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE

Title 9 — Total

Title 9 — Total

p.m.

p.m.

p.m.

p.m.

GRAND TOTAL

GRAND TOTAL

20 002 420

20 002 420

90 010

90 010

20 092 430

20 092 430

EXPENDITURE

| Title
  Chapter | Heading | Appropriations 2010 | Amending budget No 1 | New amount |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 |
| STAFF EXPENDITURE |
| | Title 1 — Total | 10 975 420 | | 10 975 420 |
| 2 |
| BUILDINGS, EQUIPMENT AND MISCELLANEOUS OPERATING EXPENDITURE |
| | Title 2 — Total | 2 499 000 | | 2 499 000 |
| 3 |
| OPERATIONAL EXPENDITURE |
| 3 3 | EQUALITY | 2 790 000 | 90 010 | 2 880 010 |
| | Title 3 — Total | 6 528 000 | 90 010 | 6 618 010 |
| 4 |
| OTHER EXPENDITURE |
| | Title 4 — Total | p.m. | | p.m. |
| | GRAND TOTAL | 20 002 420 | 90 010 | 20 092 430 |

Title

Chapter

Heading

Appropriations 2010

Amending budget No 1

New amount

1

1

STAFF EXPENDITURE

STAFF EXPENDITURE

Title 1 — Total

Title 1 — Total

10 975 420

10 975 420

10 975 420

10 975 420

2

2

BUILDINGS, EQUIPMENT AND MISCELLANEOUS OPERATING EXPENDITURE

BUILDINGS, EQUIPMENT AND MISCELLANEOUS OPERATING EXPENDITURE

Title 2 — Total

Title 2 — Total

2 499 000

2 499 000

2 499 000

2 499 000

3

3

OPERATIONAL EXPENDITURE

OPERATIONAL EXPENDITURE

3 3

EQUALITY

2 790 000

90 010

2 880 010

Title 3 — Total

Title 3 — Total

6 528 000

6 528 000

90 010

90 010

6 618 010

6 618 010

4

4

OTHER EXPENDITURE

OTHER EXPENDITURE

Title 4 — Total

Title 4 — Total

p.m.

p.m.

p.m.

p.m.

GRAND TOTAL

GRAND TOTAL

20 002 420

20 002 420

90 010

90 010

20 092 430

20 092 430

---
i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-10-00697-CR

IN RE Vicente REYES

Original Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 13, 2010

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CORAM NOBIS DENIED

On September 23, 2010, relator filed an “Original Petition for a Writ of ErrorCoram Nobis.” 

This court has determined that relator is not entitled to the relief sought because the common law

writ of coram nobis is not recognized in Texas. See Ex parte Massey, 249 S.W.2d 599, 601 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1952). Accordingly, the petition is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

1... This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2006-CR-6988, in the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County,

Texas, the Honorable Sharon MacRae presiding.
1 – OPINION AND ORDER 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

TIMOTHY THOMPSON, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

JEFF PREMO, State of Oregon, 

 Respondent. 

Case No. 6:16-cv-00413-AC 

OPINION AND ORDER 

MOSMAN, J., 

 On April 27, 2020, Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta issued his Findings and 

Recommendation (“F&R”) [ECF 84], recommending that this court deny Petitioner’s Second 

Amendment Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [ECF 77] and dismiss this case with prejudice. 

Petitioner objected. [ECF 92]. Respondent filed a response. [ECF 93]. Upon review, I agree with 

Judge Acosta, and I DENY the petition. 

DISCUSSION

 The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may 

file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge 

but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to 

make a de novo determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or 

recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). However, the court 

is not required to review, de novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of 

Case 6:16-cv-00413-AC Document 94 Filed 08/07/20 Page 1 of 2
2 – OPINION AND ORDER 

the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See 

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 

(9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F&R 

depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject, 

or modify any part of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). 

CONCLUSION 

Upon review, I agree with Judge Acosta’s recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R [84]. 

I DENY Petitioner’s Second Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [77] and DISMISS this case 

with prejudice. Because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right, I DECLINE to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this day of August, 2020. 

____________________________

MICHAEL W. MOSMAN

United States District Judge 

7

Case 6:16-cv-00413-AC Document 94 Filed 08/07/20 Page 2 of 2
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ALEJANDRO MARTINEZ,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-11-00214-CR

Appeal from

 297th District Court

of Tarrant County, Texas

(TC # 1048835D)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before the Court is Appellant’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to

TEX.R.APP.P. 42.2(a). As required by that rule, the withdrawal of the notice of appeal is signed by

Appellant. Further, the Clerk of this Court has forwarded a duplicate copy of the written withdrawal

to the clerk of the trial court. Because Appellant has established compliance with the requirements

of Rule 42.2(a), we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.

November 9, 2011 

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, J., and Antcliff, J.

(Do Not Publish)
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #17149 and #17150; New York Disaster Number NY-00209]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of New York (FEMA-4615-DR), dated 09/05/2021. *Incident:*
                         Remnants of Hurricane Ida. *Incident Period:*
                         09/01/2021 through 09/03/2021.
 DATES: Issued on 09/05/2021. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         11/04/2021. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         06/06/2022.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 09/05/2021, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Bronx, Kings, New York, Queens, Richmond, Westchester. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.000Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.000*For Economic Injury:*Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 17149 8 and for economic injury is 17150 0. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) James Rivera, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2021-19663 Filed 9-10-21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Power Sports Factory, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Shawn
Landgraf, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.




/s/
      Shawn LandgrafShawn
      LandgrafChief
      Executive OfficerAugust
      19, 2009
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00549

- CR

MICHAEL PIETY APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT NO. 10 OF TARR ANT COUNTY

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

-------- --

We have considered a ppellant ’ s “ Motion To Withdraw Notice Of Appeal. ”

The motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex.

R. App. P. 42.2(a). No decision of this court having been delivered before we

received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R.

App. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f).

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2 PER CURIAM

PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App

. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: January 16 , 2014
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2008 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2008

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for clarification 
 regarding the children to whom entitlement to educational assistance 
 may be transferred under the Post-9/11 Educational Assistance Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 23, 2015

   Mr. Foster (for himself and Mrs. McMorris Rodgers) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for clarification 
 regarding the children to whom entitlement to educational assistance 
 may be transferred under the Post-9/11 Educational Assistance Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``GI Education Benefit Fairness Act''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION REGARDING THE CHILDREN TO WHOM ENTITLEMENT TO 
              EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE MAY BE TRANSFERRED UNDER THE POST-
              9/11 EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Section 3319(c) of title 38, United States Code, 
is amended to read as follows:
    ``(c) Eligible Dependents.--
            ``(1) Transfer.--An individual approved to transfer an 
        entitlement to educational assistance under this section may 
        transfer the individual's entitlement as follows:
                    ``(A) To the individual's spouse.
                    ``(B) To one or more of the individual's children.
                    ``(C) To a combination of the individuals referred 
                to in subparagraphs (A) and (B).
            ``(2) Definition of children.--For purposes of this 
        subsection, the term `children' includes dependents described 
        in section 1072(2)(I) of title 10.''.
    (b) Applicability.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to educational assistance payable under chapter 33 
of title 38, United States Code, before, on, or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                     AMENDMENT NO. 4 (THE "AMENDMENT") TO
                         EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN
      THE UNIVISION NETWORK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ("UNLP") AND RAY RODRIGUEZ, 
              (AS PREVIOUSLY AMENDED, THE "EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT") 

                               January 1, 1999

To:  Ray Rodriguez
     c/o UNLP

Dear Ray:

     Your Employment Agreement will expire on December 31, 2000 (the "Term"). 
UNLP desires to extend the Term for an additional one-year period.  You and 
we hereby agree to amend the Employment Agreement as follows:

     1.  TERM.  The Term is hereby extended for an additional one-year 
period.  The Employment Agreement shall expire on December 31, 2001, unless 
earlier terminated in accordance with the terms set forth in the Employment 
Agreement.

     2.  SALARY.  Your annual Base Salary rate shall be: Six Hundred Fifty 
Thousand Dollars ($650,000) for calendar year 1999; Seven Hundred Thousand 
Dollars ($700,000) for calendar year 2000; and Eight Hundred Thousand Dollars 
($800,000) for calendar year 2001. 

     3.  OTHER.  Except as provided in this Amendment, all other terms and 
conditions set forth in the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force 
and effect, and the parties hereby ratify and confirm the Employment 
Agreement, as amended hereby.

     4.  EFFECTIVE DATE OF AMENDMENT.  Upon its execution by you and UNLP, 
this Amendment shall become effective as of the date first written above.

     5.  EXCLUSIVITY.  During the Term, Employee shall not directly or 
indirectly enter into any discussions or negotiations with anyone other than 
Employer for the performance of services by Employee after the expiration of 
the Term.  Employee will negotiate in good faith exclusively with Employer if 
Employer elects to seek an extension or renewal of Employee's Employment 
Agreement prior to the expiration of the Term.

     Please indicate your agreement to this Amendment to the Employment 
Agreement by signing in the space provided below.

                                       THE UNIVISION NETWORK
                                       LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

                                       By: /s/ George W. Blank
                                          -------------------------
                                          George W. Blank
                                          Chief Financial Officer

I have read the preceding Amendment and agree to its terms and conditions:


/s/ Ray Rodriguez
----------------------
Ray Rodriguez
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.27





AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
STERIS PLC MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN
(As Assumed, Amended and Restated Effective March 28, 2019)


WHEREAS, on March 28, 2019, the Redomiciliation of STERIS plc, a public limited company organized under the laws of England and Wales, from the United Kingdom to Ireland (the “Redomiciliation”) pursuant to a court-approved scheme of arrangement under English law (the “Scheme”), was completed.  


WHEREAS, in connection with the Redomiciliation, effective March 28, 2019 the STERIS plc Management Incentive Compensation Plan was assumed, amended and restated by the Company.


WHEREAS, the Company now desires to further amend the Plan as so assumed, amended and restated (“Plan”).


NOW, THEREFORE:
		
	1.
	Section 2 of the Plan is amended and restated in its entirety effective as of the date of execution hereof to provide as follows:


“2.    Eligibility.  Participation in the Plan will be limited to those key employees that are selected for participation on an annual basis and will normally include employees at or above the rank of Manager.  Key employees selected for participation each year will be notified of their participation and given the parameters for bonus calculations early in the fiscal year.


A participant will be eligible to receive a bonus earned under the Plan for a particular fiscal year if and only if he or she remains in the employ of the Company through the end of that fiscal year, and in the case of a participant who resides in a European or Asia Pacific country, other than a U.S. expatriate residing in a European or Asia Pacific country, also remains in the employ of the Company through the date such bonus would otherwise be payable, unless otherwise determined by the CEO of STERIS, or with respect to executive officers and other senior managers reporting to the CEO of STERIS, by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of STERIS (“Committee”).”


		
	2.
	Except as modified hereby, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect and unmodified.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment No. 1 to be executed as of this 2nd day of March 2020.


STERIS plc




By: /s/  J. Adam Zangerle
Name:  J. Adam Zangerle
Title:     Senior Vice President, 
General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

October 22, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00665

- CR

John Stewart MUELLER, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Bandera County, Texas

Trial Court No. 19

- 009 Honorable M. Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal on September 30, 2019, to appeal the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress. Thereafter, the trial court clerk filed the clerk’s record. The clerk’s record does not contain a final judgment of conviction. “ With certain exceptions

. . . , this court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal filed by a criminal defendant only after a f inal judgment of conviction.” Zamarripa v. State , No. 04

- 16

- 00274

- CR, 2016 WL 3085932, at *1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio June 1, 2016, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (citing T EX

. C ODE C RIM

. P ROC

. art. 44.02); accord McKown v. State , 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth 1996, no pet.) (“Generally, we only have jurisdiction to consider an appeal by a criminal defendant where there has been a judgment of conviction.”). It is therefore ORDERED that appellant show cause in writing within fifteen days from the date of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending further order of this court

.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have here unto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 22nd day of October, 2019

.

___________________________________ LUZ ESTRADA

, Chief Deputy Clerk
# L_2014291DE.01002001.xml

| 7.10.2014 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 291/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.10.2014

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 291/20

---

Berichtigung des Gemeinsamen Standpunkts 2009/573/GASP des Rates vom 27. Juli 2009 zur Änderung des Gemeinsamen Standpunkts 2006/795/GASP über restriktive Maßnahmen gegen die Demokratische Volksrepublik Korea

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 197 vom 29. Juli 2009
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 197 vom 29. Juli 2009

Auf Seite 114, Artikel 1 Nr. 6, neuer Artikel 5 Absatz 4:

anstatt:

„(4)   Die Mitgliedstaaten errichten gemäß ihren innerstaatlichen Rechtsvorschriften Informationsaustauschmechanismen für die Erhebung und Übermittlung einschlägiger Daten aus den Überprüfungen nach den Absätzen 1 und 2, wie z. B. Ursprung, Inhalt und Endbestimmung.“

muss es heißen:

„(4)   Für Luftfahrzeuge und Schiffe, die Ladung in die oder aus der DVRK befördern, gilt die Pflicht einer zusätzlichen Vorabmeldung aller Güter, die in einen Mitgliedstaat verbracht werden oder diesen verlassen.“

---
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.01

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Bottomline Home Loan, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A Form for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Buster Williams, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of Bottomline Home Loan, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:


         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of Bottomline Home Loan, Inc.




/s/ Buster Williams, Jr.
--------------------------------------
Buster Williams, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer


August 4, 2006


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.