alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINACIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AS OF AND FOR THE
FIFTY-TWO WEEK PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 27, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-27-1998
<CASH>                                         217,775
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,855
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    310,850
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               617,089
<PP&E>                                       8,089,516
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,768,278
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,956,178
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,252,879
<BONDS>                                         49,464
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        46,675
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,718,404
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,956,178
<SALES>                                     18,844,086
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,987,623
<CGS>                                        6,856,996
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               20,129,135
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,683,645
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,900
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             153,901
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,982,958)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,982,958)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,982,958)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.28)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Altair Nanotechnologies Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, John Fallini, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:


(a)
                The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (b)
                The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




/s/  John
Fallini


John
Fallini


Chief
Financial Officer


March 16,
2009
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. John Chiarello, Appellant, v James L. Berbary, as Superintendent of Collins Correctional Facility, Respondent.

Submitted December 26, 2006;

decided February 15, 2007

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.

Judge Jones taking no part.
Motion s Granted and Order filed September 28 , 2017

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 16

- 00113

- CV

____________ IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF CARRIE HOLLOMAN

SLAGLE AND ALAN PAUL SLAGLE

On Appeal from the 300th District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 76596

- F



### ORDER
After we struck his original and amended brief in early August, appellant Alan Paul Slagle timely filed a redrawn br ief (which he calls his “Second AMENDED brief”) on August 22.
On September 11, 2017, appellant filed a motion to amend the brief along with his proposed amended brief, which he calls his “ Second AMENDED August 22nd, 2017 Brief

” brief. He offers this expla nation in his motion for why he should be permitted to amend the brief:
The Court should allow appellant to amend his brief because his2

amendment does not present new points of error and only adds more case facts and more citations to the record that he di d not have time to provide in the brief time window given for August 22nd brief. The amendment also adds citations to the supplemental clerk’s record that was not filed until after his August 22nd submission. The amendment also provides appendices to prese nt the final decree of divorce and the statutes cited within the brief that appellant was not aware was required until after his August 22nd submission.

N o response to that motion has been received

. On September 20, 2017, appellant filed a second motion to amend his brief as well as his proposed brief (which, like the September 11 brief, he calls his “ Second AMENDED August 22nd, 2017 Brief ”). He writes in his motion:
At the time of his submission, he did not have access to the text of Fam. Code §3.003 for inclusion in his Appendix B

– Statutes and Local Rules.

. . . No prejudice will result to appellee if the Court permits this amendment. Appellant’s amendment only supplements Appendix B with a missing statute. No new points of error and no new arguments

a re presented. The word count of this amended brief is the same as his brief submitted on Sept. 10th. Appellee’s was due on September 21, 2017

. On that day, s he filed a motion
for a 60

- day extension to file her brief , which this court granted

. A ppellee’s mo tion
for extension did not mention appellant’s motions to amend. “A brief may be amended or supplemented whenever justice requires, on whatever reasonable terms the court may prescribe.” Tex. R. App. P. 38.7. Accordingly, we order as follows:

1. Appellant’s September 11, 2017 motion for leave to amend is GRANTED.

2. Appellant’s September 20, 2017 motion for leave to amend is GRANTED.3

3. T he brief filed September 20, 2017 will be considered the brief of appellant.

4. N o further amendments by appellant will be permitte d. Any motion
for leave to amend appellant’s brief will be denied.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jamison, Busby, and Donovan.
#### NATIONAL LIFE INS. CO., Appellant, v. WALSH, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

December 22, 1896.)

Action by the National Life Insurance Company against Elizabeth Walsh. F. R. Coudert, Jr., for appellant. C. D. Rust, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00549-CR

MICHAEL PIETY APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT NO. 10 OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered appellant’s “Motion To Withdraw Notice Of Appeal.” 

The motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. 

R. App. P. 42.2(a). No decision of this court having been delivered before we 

received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f).

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: January 16, 2014
#### People, Respondent, v. Keyser *et al.,*Appellants.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department.*

May 2, 1890.)

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN
NO. 03-0 8 -00 630 -CR

Sc ot t A nt honyG unn , A ppe lla nt

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF LAMP ASAS COUNTY , 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 8161 , HO NORAB LE JOE CARRO LL, JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant’s br ief on a

ppeal wa s o r ig in a ll y

due January

5, 2009. On counse l’s motion, the time for f

iling wa s ext ended t o Fe bruar y 13, 2009. No brief

has bee n filed on appe llant’s b e h a l f a n d n o f u rt h e r e x t e n s i o n o f t i m e f

o r f i l i n g h a s b e e n s o u g h t . A p p e l l a n t ’ s a p p o i n t e d a t t o r n e y, Scott K. Stevens, did not respond to this C ourt’s notice that the brief is ove rdue.

The appea l is abate d. The trial court shall conduct a hear ing to de termin e whether
a pp e lla nt d e sir e s to prose c ute thi s a pp e a l and , if

so , w he the r c ouns e l ha s a ba nd on e d th e a

pp e a l. Te x. R. Ap p. P. 38 .8 (b )( 2)
. Th e c ourt sh a ll make a pp ro pr ia te fi nd ing s a nd reco mm end a tio ns . I f n e c e ssa ry , the c ourt sh a ll ap po int su bs tit ute c ouns e l who wi ll e ff

e c tiv e ly re pr e se nt a

pp e lla nt i n th is
cause . A record from this hear ing, including copies of all finding s and orders and a tra nscription of the cour t reporte r’s notes, sha ll be forwa rded to the Cler

k of this Court for filing as a supplementa l
rec ord no later

than J une 5, 2009. Te x . R. App. P. 38.8(b)(3).2 ____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ________________________________ Diane M. H enson, Jus tice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Pury ear and He nson Abated Filed: May

8, 2009 Do No t Pu

bli sh
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC or Receiver), as Receiver for each of the following insured depository institutions, was charged with the duty of winding up the affairs of the former institutions and liquidating all related assets. The Receiver has fulfilled its obligations and made all dividend distributions required by law. Notice of Termination of Receiverships
Fund
Receivership name
City
State
Termination date10085
Security Bank of Bibb County
Macon
GA
09/01/202110174
Bank of Leeton
Leeton
MO
09/01/202110182
Marshall Bank, NA
Hallock
MN
09/01/202110222
New Century Bank
Chicago
IL
09/01/202110223
Peotone Bank and Trust Company
Peotone
IL
09/01/202110246
Arcola Homestead Savings Bank
Arcola
IL
09/01/2021
 The Receiver has further irrevocably authorized and appointed FDIC-Corporate as its attorney-in-fact to execute and file any and all documents that may be required to be executed by the Receiver which FDIC-Corporate, in its sole discretion, deems necessary, including but not limited to releases, discharges, satisfactions, endorsements, assignments, and deeds. Effective on the termination dates listed above, the Receiverships have been terminated, the Receiver has been discharged, and the Receiverships have ceased to exist as legal entities. (Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1819) Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Dated at Washington, DC, on September 1, 2021. James P. Sheesley, Assistant Executive Secretary.


[FR Doc. 2021-19195 Filed 9-3-21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of Univision Communications Inc.

PTI Holdings, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
Univision Television Group, Inc.,
KWEX License Partnership, G.P., a California general partnership
KUVN License Partnership, G.P., a California general partnership
KMEX License Partnership, G.P., a California general partnership
KDTV License Partnership, G.P., a California general partnership
KFTV License Partnership, G.P., a California general partnership
KTVW License Partnership, G.P., a California general partnership
KXLN License Partnership, G.P., a California general partnership
WGBO License Partnership, G.P., a California general partnership
WXTV License Partnership, G.P., a California general partnership
WLTV License Partnership, G.P., a California general partnership
KUVS License Partnership, G.P., a California general partnership
KUVI License Partnership, G.P., a California general partnership
The Univision Network Limited Partnership
Galavision, Inc.
Sunshine Acquisition, Limited Partnership
Sunshine Acquisition Corp.
Univision Online, Inc.
Vision Latina, S.A. de C.V.
Creaciones Calientes, S.A. de C.V.
Univision - EV Holdings, LLC
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between City of Cortland, Respondent, and Murray Walter, Inc., et al., Appellants.

— Kane, J.

The parties were involved in arbitration which resulted in an award to petitioner. The award was dated March 24, 1984 and delivered to petitioner on April 3, 1984. On or about June 18, 1984, petitioner applied by motion returnable on July 13, 1984 to confirm the award. Prior to the return date, the award was paid and the motion was not heard. On or about November 6, 1985, petitioner renoticed its prior motion to confirm. Respondents opposed the motion on the ground the application to confirm was not made within one year after delivery of the award to petitioner, as required by CPLR 7510. Special Term granted the motion to confirm and this appeal ensued.

We affirm. The record substantiates petitioner’s contention that the application originally made on June 18, 1984 was adjourned and, accordingly, the application herein was timely. Confirmation of the award does not prejudice respondents. Respondents never moved to modify or vacate the award and indeed have paid the award. The order should be affirmed.

Order affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Casey, Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.
GUNNISON TUNNEL AB LATERALLatitude: 38.485Longitude: -107.749Elevation: 10227

GUNNISON TUNNEL AB LATERAL
WEBER RIVER AT ECHO, UTLatitude: 40.967Longitude: -111.433Elevation: 5451

WEBER RIVER AT ECHO, UT

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Redden Mine Lwr Site Page...



Redden Mine Lwr

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Beaver Divide Site Page...



Beaver Divide

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Brighton Site Page...



Brighton

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Chalk Creek #1 Site Page...



Chalk Creek #1

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Chalk Creek #2 Site Page...



Chalk Creek #2

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Hayden Fork Site Page...



Hayden Fork

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Smith  Morehouse Site Page...



Smith  Morehouse

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Thaynes Canyon Site Page...



Thaynes Canyon

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Trial Lake Site Page...



Trial Lake
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2091 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2091

   To amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act to clarify the ability to 
  request consumer reports in certain cases to establish and enforce 
                   child support payments and awards.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 29, 2015

Mr. Poliquin (for himself, Mr. Ellison, Mr. David Scott of Georgia, Mr. 
Duffy, Mr. Murphy of Florida, and Mrs. Wagner) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act to clarify the ability to 
  request consumer reports in certain cases to establish and enforce 
                   child support payments and awards.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Child Support Assistance Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. REQUESTS FOR CONSUMER REPORTS BY STATE OR LOCAL CHILD SUPPORT 
              ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES.

    Paragraph (4) of section 604(a) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act 
(15 U.S.C. 1681b(a)(4)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``or determining the 
        appropriate level of such payments'' and inserting ``, 
        determining the appropriate level of such payments, or 
        enforcing a child support order, award, agreement, or 
        judgment'';
            (2) in subparagraph (B)--
                    (A) by striking ``paternity'' and inserting 
                ``parentage''; and
                    (B) by adding ``and'' at the end;
            (3) by striking subparagraph (C); and
            (4) by redesignating subparagraph (D) as subparagraph (C).
                                 <all>
```
#### BAGG, Bespondent, v. VILLAGE OF CLINTON, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 16, 1896.)

Action by Martha E. Bagg against the village of Clinton.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Prescient Applied Intelligence, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Jane F. Hoffer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Jane F. HofferJane F. Hoffer President and Chief Executive
Officer March 29, 2007
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-40475 c/w No. 99-40477

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ERIC JEROME RELIFORD, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:98-CR-67-1

-------------------- March 1, 2000 Before KING, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Eric Jerome Reliford has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Reliford has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
#### Jason Burlew et al., Plaintiffs and Richard Katchuk, Respondent, v Talisman Energy USA Inc., Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[945 NYS2d 587]

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Smith, J.P., Carni, Bindley and Sconiers, JJ.
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

Written Statement of Chief Financial
Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of
LCC International, Inc. (the Company), hereby
certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (a) | the Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal
    year ended December 31, 2002, filed on the date hereof with the
    Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report)
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|
| | (b) | information contained in the Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                

A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to LCC
International, Inc. and will be retained by LCC International,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ GRAHAM B. PERKINS  
| |                        
| | Graham B. Perkins      
| | Chief Financial Officer
| | March 28, 2003
ARKANSAS RIVER AT LAS ANIMAS, CO.Latitude: 38.081Longitude: -103.22Elevation: 3883.97

ARKANSAS RIVER AT LAS ANIMAS, CO.

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Ute Creek Site Page...



Ute Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Glen Cove Site Page...



Glen Cove

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Saint Elmo Site Page...



Saint Elmo

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Hayden Pass Site Page...



Hayden Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Apishapa Site Page...



Apishapa

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Brumley Site Page...



Brumley

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Culebra #2 Site Page...



Culebra #2

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Fremont Pass Site Page...



Fremont Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Independence Pass Site Page...



Independence Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Ivanhoe Site Page...



Ivanhoe

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Porphyry Creek Site Page...



Porphyry Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to South Colony Site Page...



South Colony

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Whiskey Ck Site Page...



Whiskey Ck

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Medano Pass Site Page...



Medano Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Buckskin Joe Site Page...



Buckskin Joe

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Rough And Tumble Site Page...



Rough And Tumble
SCWC-16-0000200 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

CAROLYN UYEDA and JAY UYEDA, Petitioners and Respondents/Petitioners-Appellees,

vs. EVAN SCHERMER, Respondent and Petitioner/Respondent-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-16-0000200; CASE NO. 3SS 15-1-153K) ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Reck tenwald, C.J., Nak ayama, Mc Kenna, Po llack, an d Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioners and Respondents/Petitioners-Appellees Carolyn Uyeda and Jay Uyeda’s application for writ of certiorari filed on April 12, 2018, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, May 23, 2018. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-16-0000200 23-MAY-2018 11:06 AM