alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Roger Todd BOUCHARD, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 06-4276.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 4, 2007.

Decided: May 31, 2007.

Leslie Carter Rawls, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Gretchen C.F. Shappert, United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, Corey F. Ellis, Office of the United States Attorney, Ashe-ville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Roger Todd Bouchard appeals his convictions and sentence following a guilty plea to possession of a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1) (2000), and possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (2000). Bouchard’s attorney has filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating that there are no meritorious issues for appeal but raising as potential issues whether the district court complied with Fed.R.Crim.P. 11 and whether trial counsel was ineffective. Bouchard filed a pro se supplemental brief. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

First, counsel raises the issue of whether the district court fully complied with Rule 11, but identifies no error in the Rule 11 proceeding. After a thorough review of the record, we find the district court fully complied with the requirements of Rule 11.

Both Bouchard and his present counsel question whether trial counsel provided ineffective assistance. Because the record does not conclusively establish ineffective assistance of counsel, we find the claim is not cognizable on direct appeal. *See United States v. DeFusco,*949 F.2d 114, 120-21 (4th Cir.1991) (holding that claims of ineffective assistance of counsel must be brought in a collateral proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000), unless it conclusively appears from the face of the record that counsel was ineffective).

*365In accordance with *Anders,*we have reviewed the entire record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. We therefore affirm Bouchard’s convictions and sentence. This court requires that counsel inform her client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Case 3:16-cv-00318-SI Document 20 Filed 01/10/17 Page 1 of 2
10th January 

/s/ Michael H. Simon

Case 3:16-cv-00318-SI Document 20 Filed 01/10/17 Page 2 of 2
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1919 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide Medicare beneficiary access to eye tracking accessories for speech generating devices 

and to remove the rental cap for durable medical equipment under 

the Medicare Program with respect to speech generating devices. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 21, 2015 

Mrs. MCMORRIS RODGERS (for herself and Mr. SCALISE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide 

Medicare beneficiary access to eye tracking accessories 

for speech generating devices and to remove the rental 

cap for durable medical equipment under the Medicare 

Program with respect to speech generating devices. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Steve Gleason Act of 

5 2015’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1919 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROVIDING MEDICARE BENEFICIARY ACCESS TO 

2 EYE TRACKING ACCESSORIES FOR SPEECH 

3 GENERATING DEVICES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1861(n) of the Social Se5 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(n)) is amended by inserting 

6 ‘‘and eye tracking and gaze interaction accessories for 

7 speech generating devices furnished to individuals with a 

8 demonstrated medical need for such accessories’’ after 

9 ‘‘appropriate organizations)’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

11 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to devices furnished 

12 on or after January 1, 2016. 

13 SEC. 3. REMOVING THE RENTAL CAP FOR DURABLE MED14 ICAL EQUIPMENT UNDER MEDICARE WITH 

15 RESPECT TO SPEECH GENERATING DEVICES. 

16 Section 1834(a)(2)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 

17 U.S.C. 1395m(a)(2)(A)) is amended— 

18 (1) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end; 

19 (2) in clause (iii), by adding ‘‘or’’ at the end; 

20 and 

21 (3) by inserting after clause (iii) the following 

22 new clause: 

23 ‘‘(iv) in the case of devices furnished 

24 on or after October 1, 2015, and before 

25 October 1, 2018, which serves as a speech 

26 generating device or which is an accessory 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1919 IH

1 that is needed for the individual to effec2 tively utilize such a device,’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of CD&L, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Albert W. Van Ness, Jr., Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the
               Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated results of
               operations of the Company for the periods presented.

Dated: August 15, 2005


                                                 \s\ Albert W. Van Ness, Jr.
                                                  --------------------------
                                                 Albert W. Van Ness, Jr.
                                                 Chief Executive Officer



     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
     906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of Section
     1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as
     part of Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure statement.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
     been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
     furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
     request.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 10, 2019

s0904

Order 

Clerk

September 10, 2019

158235

STATE TREASURER,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 158235

COA: 340165

Wayne CC: 17-004671-CZ

DAMON S. ALLEN,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 25, 2018 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Lawrence S. Barker, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Visual Networks, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|Date: August 10, 2004                
|                                     
|/s/ Lawrence S. Barker               
|Lawrence S. Barker                   
|President and Chief Executive Officer
# L_2022192DE.01003601.xml

| 21.7.2022 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 192/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2022

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 192/36

---

Berichtigung der Richtlinie 2009/81/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 13. Juli 2009 über die Koordinierung der Verfahren zur Vergabe bestimmter Bau-, Liefer- und Dienstleistungsaufträge in den Bereichen Verteidigung und Sicherheit und zur Änderung der Richtlinien 2004/17/EG und 2004/18/EG

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 216 vom 20. August 2009
  )

Seite 94, Artikel 13 Buchstabe c Satz 1:

Anstatt:

| „c) | Aufträge, die im Rahmen eines Kooperationsprogramms vergeben werden, das auf Forschung und Entwicklung beruht und von mindestens zwei Mitgliedstaaten für die Entwicklung eines neuen Produkts und gegebenenfalls die späteren Phasen des gesamten oder eines Teils des Lebenszyklus dieses Produkts durchgeführt wird. (...)“ |
| --- | --- |

„c)

Aufträge, die im Rahmen eines Kooperationsprogramms vergeben werden, das auf Forschung und Entwicklung beruht und von mindestens zwei Mitgliedstaaten für die Entwicklung eines neuen Produkts und gegebenenfalls die späteren Phasen des gesamten oder eines Teils des Lebenszyklus dieses Produkts durchgeführt wird. (...)“

muss es heißen:

| „c) | Aufträge, die im Rahmen eines Kooperationsprogramms vergeben werden, das auf Forschung und Entwicklung beruht und von mindestens zwei Mitgliedstaaten gemeinsam für die Entwicklung eines neuen Produkts und gegebenenfalls die späteren Phasen des gesamten oder eines Teils des Lebenszyklus dieses Produkts durchgeführt wird. (...)“. |
| --- | --- |

„c)

Aufträge, die im Rahmen eines Kooperationsprogramms vergeben werden, das auf Forschung und Entwicklung beruht und von mindestens zwei Mitgliedstaaten gemeinsam für die Entwicklung eines neuen Produkts und gegebenenfalls die späteren Phasen des gesamten oder eines Teils des Lebenszyklus dieses Produkts durchgeführt wird. (...)“.

---
Technical Work Group (TWG) 1-Year Running Workplan 

Updated: June 12, 2009 

July 16, 2009 

Web Conference October 5-6, 2009 January 12-14, 2010 March 15-

NSE Study Fall Steady Flow/NSE study Plan FINAL review (GCMRC) GCMRCR Annual Reporting Meeting (2 days, 1 TWG) Initial biennial bud

rec. (BAHG & CRA

General Core Monitoring Science Advisors annual report 2008 HFE final report, integrate research results specific to HFE Annual Reporting M

(Hamill) 

LSSF Final Report Non-native fish control plan final review Annual FSF/NSE report FY 09 carry over anNonnative Control Plan 2009 Temperature and Sediment Conditions TWG operating procedures (initial review) NSE/FSF update of Fish PEP recommendations implementation plan GCMRC science updates 2008 HFE reporting HBC ASMR assess

(Coggins 

Ecologist Update TWG operating procedures: initial discussion HFE reporting HBC survey update Economic workshop update Past 2012: compliance (NEPA/ESA) Develop initial budget concerns/issues with full TWG, starting point for BAHG GCMRC science up

General Core monitoring plan TWG operating proFish PEP recommendations implementation Develop GCMRC annual reporting requirements for January meeting 2008 HFE reporting 

Management Actions? 

Economic workshop update? Budgetary considerations of a core monitoring program (initial) Report: Effects of capture by trammel nets on native Arizona fishes, BIO2.R12.08 completion report, Teresa Hunt Cultural: museum of Northern Arizona (45 mins) HBC comprehensive plan 

Elect TWG Chair 

Review/revise TWG workplan Review/revise TWG workplan Review/revise TWG workplan Review/revise TWG
SIMON TRANSPORTATION SERVICES INC.
                SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF NET EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                   (Unaudited)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                For the Three Months Ended
                                                          --------------------------------------
<S>                                                             <C>                <C> 
Basic and Diluted:                                              Dec 31, 1998       Dec 31, 1997
                                                                ------------       ------------

Common shares outstanding beginning of period:                     6,205,334          6,282,974

Common share equivalents:

         Common stock repurchased
                  Basic                                              (67,804)                --
                  Diluted                                            (67,804)                --

         Employee stock options outstanding
                  Basic                                                   --                 --
                  Diluted                                                 --            172,869

         Employee stock options exercised
                  Basic                                                   --              1,445
                  Diluted                                                 --              1,445
                                                          --------------------------------------

         Number of common shares and common
               Share equivalents outstanding
                  Basic                                            6,137,530          6,284,419
                                                          ======================================
                  Diluted                                          6,137,530          6,457,288
                                                          ======================================

Net earnings                                                    $     45,140       $  1,863,945
                                                             
         Net earnings per common share
               and common share equivalent
                  Basic                                         $       0.01       $       0.30
                                                          ======================================
                  Diluted                                       $       0.01       $       0.29
                                                          ======================================


</TABLE>
#### King *v.*Mobile & Northwestern Railroad Co. *et al.*

Appeal from Mobile Chancery Court.

Heard before the Hon. William II. Tayloe.

F. G. Bromberg and Chas. L. Bromberg, Jr., for appellant.

Pillans, Torrey & Hanaw and Bestor & Gray, for appellee.

The appellant recovered a judgment upon a verdict of a jury in the circuit court of Mobile county against the Mobile and Northwestern Railroad Company on the eighth dayof Januaxw, 1895, for the sum of five thousand, three hundred and seventy-two dollars, for services rendered to and work done for said railroad company. Execution issued upon said judgment against the said railroad company which was returned by the sheriff unsatisfied, with the endorsement of “No property of the defendant found Avithin the county.” Thereupon the appellant filed this bill for himself and all other creditors of said railroad *702company, to recover from the appellees their unpaid subscriptions to the capital stock of the company in satisfaction of said judgment, recovered in the circuit court. The bill alleged that the corporation was insolvent and had ceased to do any corporate business since 1875.

On the final submission of the'cause on the pleadings and proof, the chancellor dismissed the bill. From this decree the complainant appeals, and assigns the rendition thereof as error.

The decree of the chancellor is affirmed.

Opinion by

Tyson, J.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1884 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1884

                     One Hundred Fourteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the sixth day of January, two thousand and fifteen

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
206 West Commercial Street in East Rochester, New York, as the ``Officer 
            Daryl R. Pierson Memorial Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. OFFICER DARYL R. PIERSON MEMORIAL POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 206 West Commercial Street in East Rochester, New York, 
shall be known and designated as the ``Officer Daryl R. Pierson 
Memorial Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Officer 
Daryl R. Pierson Memorial Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in  Registration  Statement  Nos.
333-76820,  333-100637,  333-117125,  333-102592  and  333-110115  on Form  S-3,
Registration  Statement Nos. 333-64495,  333-33481,  333-99099 and 333-108419 on
Form  S-8 of our  report  dated  March 7,  2005,  relating  to the  consolidated
financial statements of Altair  Nanotechnologies Inc. and subsidiaries appearing
in  this  Annual  Report  on Form  10-K  of  Altair  Nanotechnologies  Inc.  and
subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2004.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
-------------------------------
Salt Lake City, Utah
March 7, 2005
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 11

                        APPLIED MICROSYSTEMS CORPORATION

                        Computation of Earnings Per Share
                     (in thousands, except per share amounts)

                                            THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
                                               1997            1996
                                            ---------        --------

Average shares outstanding                     6,694           6,480  
Net effect of dilutive stock warrants 
  and options based on the treasury stock 
  method using average market price              407             603  
                                            ---------        --------
Total                                          7,101           7,083  
                                            ---------        --------
                                            ---------        --------

Net Income                                       $42            $702  
                                            ---------        --------
                                            ---------        --------

Per share amount                                 $.01           $.10  
                                            ---------        --------
                                            ---------        --------

                                    -14-