alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1816 Engrossed in House (EH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1816

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To exclude from consideration as income under the United States Housing 
 Act of 1937 payments of pension made under section 1521 of title 38, 
  United States Code, to veterans who are in need of regular aid and 
                              attendance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Vulnerable Veterans Housing Reform 
Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM INCOME.

    Paragraph (4) of section 3(b) of the United States Housing Act of 
1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437a(b)(4)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and any amounts'' and inserting ``, any 
        amounts'';
            (2) by striking ``or any deferred'' and inserting ``, any 
        deferred''; and
            (3) by inserting after ``prospective monthly amounts'' the 
        following: ``, and any expenses related to aid and attendance 
        as detailed under section 1521 of title 38, United States 
        Code''.

SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON AWARDS AND BONUSES PAID TO EMPLOYEES OF 
              DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    Section 705 of the Veterans Access, Choice, and Accountability Act 
of 2014 (Public Law 113-146; 38 U.S.C. 703 note) is amended by 
inserting before the period at the end the following: ``, except that 
the dollar amount limitation applicable under this section for each of 
fiscal years 2016 through 2020 shall be such dollar amount as reduced 
by $10,000,000''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 18, 2015.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1816

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To exclude from consideration as income under the United States Housing 
 Act of 1937 payments of pension made under section 1521 of title 38, 
  United States Code, to veterans who are in need of regular aid and 
                              attendance.
```
#### In the Matter of Julian J.C. Administration for Children’s Services et al., Respondents; Juan C., Appellant, et al., Respondent.

[946 NYS2d 874]

In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Olshansky, J.), dated March 14, 2011, as, after fact-finding and dispositional hearings, determined that his consent to the subject adoption was not required, and transferred the rights of custody and guardianship of the subject child to the New York City Children’s Service and the New York Foundling Hospital for the purpose of adoption.

*938Ordered that the order of fact-finding and disposition is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court’s determination that the father’s consent to the adoption of the subject child was not required is supported by clear and convincing evidence *(see Matter of Jaden Dasani-Amru B. [Roy Alphonso B.],*74 AD3d 801 [2010]). The father failed to meet his burden of establishing that he maintained substantial and continuous or repeated contact with the child through the payment of support and either regular visitation or other communication with the child *(see*Domestic Relations Law § 111 [1] [d]; *Matter of Seasia D.,*10 NY3d 879, 880 [2008], *cert denied sub nom. Kareem W. v Mr. & Mrs. Anonymous,*555 US 1046 [2008]; *Matter of Sharissa G.,*51 AD3d 1019 [2008]; *Matter of Hassan Lawrence W.,*42 AD3d 573 [2007]).

The Family Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in declining the father’s request for an adjournment prior to making a disposition in this matter, since the record fails to demonstrate any “good cause shown” for an adjournment (Family Ct Act § 626 [a]; *see Matter of Williams D. [Vernetta Bernadett D.],*82 AD3d 882 [2011]).

The father’s remaining contentions are improperly raised for the first time on appeal *(see Matter of Marcena S.,*103 AD2d 847 [1984]). Dillon, J.P., Balkin, Belen and Chambers, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Edwin B. Borison, an Attorney.

— Proceeding commenced by a notice pursuant to section 691.3 of the Rules Governing the Conduct of Attorneys [22 NYCRR 691.3] to discipline Edwin B. Borison, an attorney admitted by this court on December 16, 1959.

Based upon the disciplinary action imposed upon the attorney by order of the Supreme Court, State of New Jersey, effective June 10, 1986, Edwin B. Borison is suspended from the practice of law in this State for one year retroactive to June 10, 1986. Mollen, P. J., Lazer, Mangano, Thompson and Brown, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.18(1)


 


 


July 1, 2020


 


Thomas Garite, MD


653 Round Tree Drive


Grand Junction, CO 81506


 


Re: Amendment to Offer of Employment for Thomas
Garite, MD dated June 17, 2020


 


Dear Tom:


 


This letter is an amendment (the “Amendment”)
to the aforementioned Offer of Employment from Sera Prognostics, Inc. dated June 17, 2020 (the “Offer of Employment”).


 


Effective July 1, 2020, your salary will be
$16,000.00 per month, paid semi-monthly on the 15th & last day of each month. This is based on an assumption of an
average monthly effort of 80 hours.


 


All other terms, conditions and provisions of
the Offer of Employment remain unchanged by this amendment and are in full force and effect.


 


	 	Sincerely,
	 	 
	 	Sera Prognostics, Inc.
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Gregory Critchfield
	 	 	      Gregory Critchfield
	 	Its:	      Chairman, President, and CEO




 


	This Amendment is accepted and agreed
    to as of the date hereof:	 
	 	 
	/s/ Thomas Garite, MD	 
	Thomas Garite, MD	 
	 	 
	Dated:  	7/1/20
Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 1879 Filed 02/10/17 Page 1 of 10
Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 1879 Filed 02/10/17 Page 2 of 10
Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 1879 Filed 02/10/17 Page 3 of 10
Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 1879 Filed 02/10/17 Page 4 of 10
Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 1879 Filed 02/10/17 Page 5 of 10
Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 1879 Filed 02/10/17 Page 6 of 10
Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 1879 Filed 02/10/17 Page 7 of 10
Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 1879 Filed 02/10/17 Page 8 of 10
Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 1879 Filed 02/10/17 Page 9 of 10
Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 1879 Filed 02/10/17 Page 10 of 10
# C_2009225EN.01000401.xml

| 18.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5570 — Platinum Equity Group/Delphi Corporation)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 225/02

On 5 August 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5570. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5570. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
PECOS RIVER NEAR ACME, NMLatitude: 33.572Longitude: -104.374Elevation: 3519

PECOS RIVER NEAR ACME, NM

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Sierra Blanca Site Page...



Sierra Blanca

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Adams Ranch #1 Site Page...



Adams Ranch #1

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Wesner Springs Site Page...



Wesner Springs

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Elk Cabin Site Page...



Elk Cabin

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Santa Fe Site Page...



Santa Fe
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Dura Automotive Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
David R. Bovee, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.





/s/ David R. Bovee
-------------------------

David R. Bovee
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
March 8, 2004
Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program

Technical Work Group Meeting, June 14-15, 2023 

Action Items

NEW ACTION ITEMS

• Add the action items list to the TWG meeting minutes going forward

• Add DO (Dissolved Oxygen) to the Water Quality presentation for August AMWG meeting

• Review FLAHG Proposal received on Monday June 12 and send comments to Sinjin by Wed next 

week (June 21)

• Apply the new FLAHG proposal for sediment accounting and implementation window in 

“hindcast” to last 10 years of data

• Schedule a special two hour TWG webinar for2 PM on Aug 9th for the purpose of hearing final 

FLAHG proposal and hopefully obtain a motion to accept

• Get a date on the calendar for TWG/AMWG joint webinar for fall HFE decision

• When LTEMP SEIS Schedule is known, please distribute to TWG group

• Send link shared in chat for USGS DO data to all TWG members

• Request to start developing material for Jan budget planning now, to include program overview, 

status of where we have been and where we are going

OLD ACTION ITEMS – Still Open

• The TWG needs to summarize the Incentivized Harvest Program and assess its 

effects as a way to remove fish (other than mechanical removal) if there is a trigger. 

• WAPA requests that Reclamation make the P&I team opinions more public for 

better sharing on their deliberations.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                              L Q CORPORATION, INC.
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of L Q Corporation, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William J. Fox, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:  March 31, 2005


                                          /s/  William J. Fox
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          William J. Fox
                                          Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7435

BERNARD SINGLETON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; RON ANGELONE, Director of Prisons,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge.

(CA-00-1430-AM)

Submitted: March 8, 2001 Decided: March 15, 2001

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bernard Singleton, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Bernard Singleton seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

Singleton’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, deny a

certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Singleton v. Commonwealth of

Virginia, No. CA-00-1430-AM (E.D. Va. Sept. 13, 2000). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### In the Matter of James Curl, Respondent, v Walter R. Kelly, as Superintendent of Attica Correctional Facility, et al., Appellants.

— Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Since the only issue raised in this CPLR article 78 proceeding is whether the determination of the Hearing Officer is supported by substantial evidence, Special Term erred in deciding the matter on the merits rather than transferring it to this court (CPLR 7804 [g]). Nonetheless, we will consider the matter as if it had been properly transferred in the first instance *(Matter of O’Brien v Steisel,*104 AD2d 817).

It has been established that "[a] written misbehavior report by itself can constitute substantial evidence of an inmate’s misconduct” *(Matter of Perez v Wilmot,*67 NY2d 615, 616; *People ex rel. Vega v Smith,*66 NY2d 130). The misbehavior report here describes, with specificity, an incident which the correction officer claims to have witnessed, and the rule allegedly violated; it is dated the same day as the incident and is signed by its author. Thus, we find that the report is sufficiently relevant and probative to support the determination of the Hearing Officer. "If petitioner wished to cross-examine the charging officer, he had the right to call the officer as a witness” *(Matter of Perez v Wilmot, supra,*p 617; *see, Matter of Coleman v Coombe,*65 NY2d 777). Petitioner called witnesses to testify in exoneration of the charged misconduct. The essential issue at the hearing was credibility, and the Hearing Officer was entitled to credit the charging officer’s report *(Matter of Perez v Wilmot, supra,*p 617; *People ex rel. Vega v Smith, supra,*p 140). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Newman, J. — art 78.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Pine and Balio, JJ.
# L_2014106EN.01004701.xml

| 9.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 106/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 106/47

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision 2010/289/EU of 19 January 2010 on the existence of an excessive deficit in Slovenia

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 125 of 21 May 2010
  )

In the contents and on page 46, in the title:

for:

‘Council Decision of 19 January 2010 on the existence of an excessive deficit in Slovenia (2010/289/EU)’,

read:

‘Council Decision of 2 December 2009 on the existence of an excessive deficit in Slovenia (2010/289/EU)’;

on page 47, concluding formula:

for:

‘Done at Brussels, 19 January 2010.

For the Council

The President

E. SALGADO
  ’,

read:

‘Done at Brussels, 2 December 2009.

For the Council

The President

A. BORG
  ’.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                            5

<S>                                  <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                        SEP-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                         NOV-30-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<CASH>                                   244,577
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                               52,587
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         348,221
<PP&E>                                   693,960
<DEPRECIATION>                           531,098
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         1,532,721
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  1,143,948
<BONDS>                                2,990,000
<COMMON>                              11,780,662
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                            1,393,889
<OTHER-SE>                            11,780,662
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           1,532,721
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          40,000
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            662,417
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        47,810
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (670,227)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                            (670,227)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. JESUS SANTIAGO SOSA-OR TIZ, a .k.a
. Je sus Sosa -Ortiz , De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. Nos. 13-10291

13-10292 D.C . Nos. 2:12-c r-01668-JAT

2:13-c r-50014-JAT
M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Sta t e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ariz o na R ona ld S.W . Le w, Distric t Judge , Pre siding ** Subm itte d June 25, 2014 *** B e fore : HAW K INS, TALLM AN, a nd NGUYEN, C i rc u it Judge s. In the se c onsolida

te d a ppe a ls, Je s us Sa

ntia go Sosa -Ortiz a

p pe a ls from

the distric t c o urt’ s judgm e n t a nd c ha lle nge s his guilty -ple a c onvic tion a

n d 72-m onth 

# FIL ED
JUL 10 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public a t ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3.

** The Honora

ble R ona ld S.W . Le w, Se n ior Unite d Sta t e s Distric t Judge for the C e ntra l Distric t of C a l ifornia , sitting by de signa tion. *** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).se nte nc e for re e n t ry of a re m o v e d a lie n, in viola

t ion of 8 U.S.C . § 1326, a nd the
re voc ation of supe rvise d re l e a se and 8-m onth c onc urre n t se n te nc e s im pose d the re upon. Pursua

nt to Ande rs v . C

alifornia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Sosa -Ortiz ’ s c ounse l ha s file d a

brie f stating tha

t the re a re no grounds for re lie f, a long with a
m otion to withdra

w a s c ounse l of re c ord. W e hav e provide d Sosa -Ortiz the opportunity

to file a pro se supple m e nta l brie f. No pro se supple m e nta l brie f or
a nswe ring brie f ha s be e n file d. Our inde pe nde nt re v i e w of the re c ord pursua n t to Pe nson v . Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), disc lose s no a rgua ble grounds for re lie f on dire c t a ppe a l in c a se num be r 13-10291. The a

ppe a l in c a se num

be r 13-10292 is m oot. Se e Spe nc e r v . K e mna , 523 U.S. 1, 12-14 (1998). C ounse l’ s m otion to withdra w is G RANT E D. In c a se num be r 13-10291, the judgm e nt is AFFIRM E D; in c ase num be r 13-10292, the appe al is DISM ISSE D as m oot.

13
- 1 02 9 1 & 1 3
- 1 0 2 9 2 2
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1952 

To permanently prohibit oil and gas leasing off the coast of the State 

of California, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 22, 2015 

Mrs. CAPPS (for herself, Mr. FARR, Mr. LOWENTHAL, and Mr. HUFFMAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To permanently prohibit oil and gas leasing off the coast 

of the State of California, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘California Ocean and 

5 Coastal Protection Act’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 1952 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF OIL AND GAS LEASING IN CER2 TAIN AREAS OF THE OUTER CONTINENTAL 

3 SHELF. 

4 Section 8 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act 

5 (43 U.S.C. 1337) is amended by adding at the end the 

6 following: 

7 ‘‘(q) PROHIBITION OF OIL AND GAS LEASING IN

8 CERTAIN AREAS OF THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF.— 

9 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other 

10 provision of this Act or any other law and except as 

11 provided in paragraph (2), beginning on the date of 

12 enactment of this subsection, the conduct of oil and 

13 gas preleasing, leasing, and related activities is pro14 hibited in areas of the outer Continental Shelf lo15 cated off the coast of the State of California. 

16 ‘‘(2) EFFECT.—Nothing in this subsection af17 fects any rights under leases issued under this Act 

18 before the date of enactment of this subsection.’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 10 , 2019.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 19

- 00649

- CR

ROBERT KETHE CALHOUN , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 179th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1321230

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant entered a guilty plea to burglary of a habitation with intent to
commit theft . In accordance with the terms of a plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court sente nced appellant to confinement for eight years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. We dismiss the appeal.
The trial court entered a certification of the defendant’s right to appeal in
which the court certified that th is is a plea bargain case, and the defendant has no2

right of appeal. See T ex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal. See T ex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). The record supports
th e trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

Moreover , appellant’s sentence was entered October 11, 2011. Appellant’s notice of appeal, which was due November 10, 2011, was not filed until August 7,
2019. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). If an appeal is not timely perfected, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal. Slaton v.
State , 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Spain, and Poissant

. Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)