alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2012211DE.01001201.xml

| 8.8.2012 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 211/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.8.2012

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 211/12

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 631/2009 der Kommission vom 22. Juli 2009 mit Durchführungsbestimmungen für Anhang I der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 78/2009 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates über die Typgenehmigung von Kraftfahrzeugen hinsichtlich des Schutzes von Fußgängern und anderen ungeschützten Verkehrsteilnehmern sowie zur Änderung der Richtlinie 2007/46/EG und zur Aufhebung der Richtlinien 2003/102/EG und 2005/66/EG

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 195 vom 25. Juli 2009
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 195 vom 25. Juli 2009

Auf Seite 26, Kapitel VII, Nummer 3.3.:

anstatt:

3.3.   Die für die Prüfung mit dem Prüfkörper Kinderkopfform/kleine Erwachsenenkopfform gewählten Prüfpunkte müssen sich:“

muss es heißen:

3.3.   Die für die Prüfung mit dem Prüfkörper Erwachsenenkopfform gewählten Prüfpunkte müssen sich:“

---
#### ARNOUX v. PHYFE et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 20, 1896.)

Action by William H. Arnoux against Amy C. Phyfe and others.

No opinion. Motion granted. See 39 N. Y. Supp. 973
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Turemail McCullough, Appellant.

[945 NYS2d 588]

Motion for writ of error coram nobis denied. Present — Scudder, P.J., Smith, Peradotto and Lindley, JJ.
#### Jack Goldberg *v.*Zoning Commission of the Town of Simsbury

*Arnold H. Klau,*in support of the petition.

Submitted April 17

decided May 8, 1975

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Hartford County is granted.
# L_2009153EN.01002901.xml

| 17.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 153/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 153/29

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 30/2009 of 16 January 2009 amending Regulation (EC) No 1032/2006 as far as the requirements for automatic systems for the exchange of flight data supporting data link services are concerned

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 13 of 17 January 2009
  )

On page 20, Article 1, point 1:

for:

‘... paragraph 4 is added:

“4.   Air navigation service providers ...” ’,

read:

‘... paragraph 3a is added:

“3a.   Air navigation service providers ...” ’.

---
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MILTON MAURICIO TACHIN ORTIZ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General,

 Respondent.

No. 23-900

Agency No.

A208-884-576

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of an

Immigration Judge

Submitted February 21, 2024**

Before: FERNANDEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Milton Mauricio Tachin Ortiz, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions 

pro se for review of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order affirming an asylum 

officer’s negative reasonable fear determination. We have jurisdiction under 

8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence an IJ’s negative reasonable 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

FEB 28 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 23-900

fear determination. Orozco-Lopez v. Garland, 11 F.4th 764, 774 (9th Cir. 2021). 

We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determination that Tachin Ortiz failed 

to show a reasonable possibility that the harm he fears would be on account of a 

protected ground. See Bartolome v. Sessions, 904 F.3d 803, 814 (9th Cir. 2018) 

(no basis for withholding of removal where petitioner did not show a nexus to a 

protected ground).

Substantial evidence also supports the IJ’s determination that Tachin Ortiz

failed to show a reasonable possibility of torture by or with the consent or 

acquiescence of the government if returned to El Salvador. See Andrade-Garcia v. 

Lynch, 828 F.3d 829, 836-37 (9th Cir. 2016) (petitioner failed to demonstrate 

government acquiescence sufficient to establish a reasonable possibility of future 

torture). Tachin Ortiz’s contention that he was beaten by the police is not properly 

before the court because he failed to raise it before the BIA. See 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1252(d)(1) (exhaustion of administrative remedies required); see also SantosZacaria v. Garland, 598 U.S. 411, 417-19 (2023) (section 1252(d)(1) is a nonjurisdictional claim-processing rule). 

The temporary stay of removal remains in place until the mandate 

issues. The motion for a stay of removal is otherwise denied.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
#### Kenneth M. Schlau, Jr., Appellant, v City of Buffalo et al., Defendants, and Frey Electric Construction Co., Inc., Respondent.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[946 NYS2d 529]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Diane Y. Devlin, J.), entered October 7, 2011 in a personal injury action. The order, among other things, denied plaintiff’s motion for leave to reargue his opposition to the summary judgment motion of defendant Frey Electric Construction Co., Inc.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs *(see Empire Ins. Co. v Food City,*167 AD2d 983, 984 [1990]). Present — Smith, J.P., Fahey, Peradotto, Sconiers and Martoche, JJ.
PECOS RIVER BELOW BRANTLEY DAM NEAR CARLSBAD, NMLatitude: 32.543Longitude: -104.371Elevation: 3210

PECOS RIVER BELOW BRANTLEY DAM NEAR CARLSBAD, NM

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Sierra Blanca Site Page...



Sierra Blanca

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Adams Ranch #1 Site Page...



Adams Ranch #1

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Wesner Springs Site Page...



Wesner Springs

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Elk Cabin Site Page...



Elk Cabin

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Santa Fe Site Page...



Santa Fe
# L_2009270EN.01001201.xml

| 15.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 270/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 270/12

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 961/2009

of 14 October 2009

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Březnický ležák (PGI))

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) and in accordance with Article 17(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, the Czech Republic’s application to register the name ‘Březnický ležák’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) and in accordance with Article 17(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, the Czech Republic’s application to register the name ‘Březnický ležák’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, this name should be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, this name should be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 14 October 2009.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 38, 17.2.2009, p. 16.

2

---

ANNEX

Foodstuffs listed in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 510/2006:

Group 2.1.   Beer

CZECH REPUBLIC

Březnický ležák (PGI)

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE SHEET AS
OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS  FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER  30,  1998 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                              0
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                               4,152,671      
<ALLOWANCES>                                  131,738
<INVENTORY>                                 1,536,189
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            6,195,491
<PP&E>                                      6,451,242
<DEPRECIATION>                              2,801,520
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             14,786,146
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       7,341,036
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        8,499
<OTHER-SE>                                  2,792,629
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               14,786,146
<SALES>                                    21,390,087
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           21,390,087
<CGS>                                      15,944,242
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              15,944,242
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            6,012,343
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              137,608
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            320,692
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,024,798)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,024,798)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (14,882)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,039,680)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.18)
        




</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          38,259
<SECURITIES>                                     2,407
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,765
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,980
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                85,806
<PP&E>                                          19,745
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,836
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 103,526
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,148
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                      54,080
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   103,526
<SALES>                                         58,236
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                89,182
<CGS>                                            1,592
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,984
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                64,188
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,046
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,237
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,809
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,809
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM COMPANY'S
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF INCOME AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001001185
<NAME>                        IDX SYSTEMS CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                           <C>               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-2000       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                JUL-01-2000       JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-2000       SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                         1                 1
<CASH>                             26,051            29,064
<SECURITIES>                       43,718            44,832
<RECEIVABLES>                     101,959           114,574
<ALLOWANCES>                       (4,841)           (3,200)
<INVENTORY>                             0                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  203,835           201,354
<PP&E>                            100,554           101,713
<DEPRECIATION>                     32,012            47,168
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    285,253           275,614
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              68,286            62,123
<BONDS>                                 0                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0                 0
<PREFERRED>                             0                 0
<COMMON>                              282               358
<OTHER-SE>                        207,645           204,033
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      285,253           275,614
<SALES>                            87,578            92,218
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   87,578            92,218
<CGS>                              60,682            56,442
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      35,399            34,349
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     (798)             (537)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      678               526
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      3                 4
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (7,705)            1,964
<INCOME-TAX>                       (2,928)              786
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (4,777)            1,178
<DISCONTINUED>                          0                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0                 0
<CHANGES>                               0                 0
<NET-INCOME>                       (4,777)            1,178
<EPS-BASIC>                         (0.17)             0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (0.17)             0.04



</TABLE>
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 15

- 00345

- CV
Norma Alicia Martinez Araujo

v. Manuel Araujo

On a ppeal from the 332nd District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Cause No. F

- 4611

- 13

- F

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered t his cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant. We further order this decision certified below for obse rvance. September 1 , 2016
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS FOR THE



### F IRST 

### D ISTRICT OF 

### T EXAS AT 

### H OUSTON



### O RDER ON 

### M OTION

Cause number: 01

- 1 4

- 0 0 984

- C V

Style: Tiffany Thomas

v

. T. Jayakumar, First Street Hospital

, and First Surgical Partners, LLC

Date motion filed * : January 30 , 201 5

Type of motion: Appellees ’ m otion for recusal of the Honorable Chief Justice Sherry Radack

Party filing motion: Appellees First Street Hospital and First Surgical Partners, LLC

Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date:

Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date:

Date Requested:

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due:

 T he Court will not grant additional motions to extend time absent extraordinary circumstances.

 Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot )

 Other: _____________________________________

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 16.3.

Judge ’ s signature: /s / C hief Justice Sherry Radack

 Acting for the Court

Panel consists of

____________________________________________

Date: February 12, 2015
SCPR-19-0000036

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

IN RE GISELA IGLESIAS, Petitioner.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the petition filed by attorney

Gisela Iglesias to resign and surrender her license to practice

law in the State of Hawai#i, pursuant to Rule 1.10 of the Rules

of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i (RSCH),

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition is granted nunc

pro tunc to December 31, 2018.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to RSCH Rule 1.10(g),

that the Petitioner shall comply with the notice, affidavit, and

record requirements of RSCH Rules 2.16(a), (b), (d), and (g).

IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the Clerk shall remove the

name of Petitioner Gisela Iglesias, attorney number 4241, from

the roll of attorneys of the State of Hawai#i, effective with the

filing of this order.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, January 31, 2019.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPR-19-0000036

31-JAN-2019

08:05 AM
Exhibit 10.37December 29, 2006GeneralElectric Capital Corporation500 West MonroeChicago, Illinois 60661     Re: GE Capital Fee LetterGentlemen:     Reference is hereby made to that certain Fifth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated asof December 29, 2006 (as amended, restated or otherwise modified from time to time, the “CreditAgreement”) by and among General Electric Capital Corporation (individually, “GECapital”) as Agent and a Lender, Wilsons Leather Holdings Inc., as Borrower(“Borrower”) and the other Credit Parties and Lenders signatory thereto from time to time.All defined terms herein shall have the respective meanings given to them in the Credit Agreement.     In addition to any fees or other amounts payable by Borrower to GE Capital or Agent under theterms of the Credit Agreement, Borrower agrees to pay to GE Capital or Agent the following fees:     (1) If Term Loan B is prepaid or repaid for any reason on or after the date hereof, Borrowershall, at the time of such payment or prepayment, pay to GE Capital as liquidated damages andcompensation for the costs of being prepared to make Term Loan B available (i) in the case of aprepayment on or after the date hereof but on or prior to June 30, 2008, an amount equal to onepercent (1.00%) multiplied by the principal amount of Term Loan B then being prepaid or repaid,(ii) in the case of a prepayment after June 30, 2008 but on or prior to June 30, 2009, an amountequal to one half percent (0.50%) multiplied by the principal amount of Term Loan B then beingprepaid or repaid and (iii) in the case of a prepayment after June 30, 2009, an amount equal tozero dollars ($0) (the “Term Loan B Prepayment Fee”). The parties hereto agree that thisSection (1) replaces and supercedes Section (1) of that certain Letter Agreement dated as of April27, 2004 between GE Capital and the Borrower, as replaced and superseded by Section (1) of thatcertain Letter Agreement dated as of March 2, 2005 between GE Capital and the Borrower and assubsequently replaced and superseded by Section (1) of that certain Letter Agreement dated as ofJanuary 31, 2006 between GE Capital and the Borrower.     (2) On the Closing Date, an arrangement fee to Agent in an amount equal to $202,500.
 

 
General Electric Capital Corporation
EX-10.9





 Exhibit 10.9 

Spousal Consent 

April 2, 2021 
 I, Wang Yonghong (ID card
No.: **), the legal spouse of Li Liping (ID card No.: **), hereby unconditionally and irrevocably agree that the shares of LinkDoc Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. (“the Company”) held by and registered in the name of Li Liping, my spouse,
will be dealt with according to the arrangements under the controlling agreements (including the Amended and Restated Exclusive Share Purchase Agreement, the Amended and Restated Shareholder Voting Rights Proxy Agreement and the Amended and Restated
Equity Pledge Agreement) (“the Controlling Agreements”) signed by my spouse on April 2, 2021 with LinkDoc Information Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. (“the Sole Proprietorship”) and other relevant parties. 

I further guarantee that I will not take any action in conflict with the above arrangements, including but not limited to claiming that the shares constitute
the jointly owned property of us as a couple. I hereby unconditionally and irrevocably waive any right or interest that may be granted to me by any applicable law in respect of the shares. 

I acknowledge that Li Liping does not need my further authorization or consent to perform, further amend or terminate the Controlling Agreements. I undertake
that I will execute all the necessary documents and take all the necessary actions to ensure the proper performance of the Controlling Agreements (as amended from time to time). I agree and undertake that if I acquire any shares held by Li Liping
for any reason, I shall be bound by the Controlling Agreements (as amended from time to time) and the Amended and Re-stated Exclusive Consulting and Service Agreement between the Sole Proprietorship and the
Company dated April 2, 2021 (the “Service Agreement”), and comply with the obligations under the Controlling Agreements (as amended from time to time) and the Service Agreement as a shareholder of the Company, and for this purpose,
once requested by the Sole Proprietorship, I shall execute the written documents in substantially the same form and content as the Controlling Agreements (as amended from time to time), and the Service Agreement. 

I further acknowledge, undertake and guarantee that in the event of the death, incapacity, divorce from my spouse or any other circumstances that may affect
the exercise of her shareholder rights in the Company, none of my heirs, guardians, creditors or any other person entitled to assert a right or interest in the shares of the Company held by my spouse will take any action that may affect or prevent
the performance of the obligations of my spouse under the Controlling Agreements in any manner or under any circumstances. 
 [There is no
text below, followed by the signature page of the Spousal Consent.] 












 [There is no text in this page, which is the signature page of the Spousal Consent of Li
Liping.] 
  

			
	Signatory:	 	 /s/ Wang Yonghong



 

			
	Spouse’s name: Wang Yonghong
	ID card No.: **
#### STEVEN, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 16, 1896.)

Action by Jacob E. Steven against the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company.

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs. All concur. See 39 N. Y. Supp. 944.