alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 12-10878 Summary Calendar

ROBERT V. MCLENNAN, Plaintiff-Appellant v. KERRI VEITCH, and John Doe Veitch, in her official and individual capacity; LARRY GARRETT, and Jane Doe Garrett, in his official and individual capacity; LARRY DAVIS, and Jane Doe Davis, in his official and individual capacity; RANDLE EFFLANDT, and Jane Doe Efflandlt, in his official and individual capacity; REGGIE BONNER, and Jane Doe Bonner, in his official and individual capacity; KELLY MCNAIR, and Jane Doe McNair, in his official and individual capacity, Defendants-Appellees

A ppeal from the United States District Court f or the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:12-CV-531
Before WIENER, ELROD, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM * 

### AFFIRMED. See 5th Cir. Rule 47.6. U n i t e d S t a te s C o u r t o f A p p e al s F i f t h C i rc u i t 

## F I L E D April 30, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47. 5, the court has determ ined that this op inion s hould not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47. 5. 4. 

### Case: 12-10878 Document: 00512225079 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/30/2013
Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program

Technical Work Group Meeting, April 12-13, 2022 

ACTION ITEMS, MOTIONS, and VOTES

Adoption of Meeting Minutes:

[Ryan Mann, AZGFD] On Page 14, under Emerging Issues, request is made for the following 

(underlined) addition: “It will be one of the management actions considered.” 

[Michelle Garrison, CWCB and TWG Vice-Chair] Minutes adopted. 

ACTION ITEMS

• [Lonnie Pilkington, NPS] Will provide an update at an upcoming TWG meeting on 

riparian vegetation and Paria Beach restoration.

• [Clarence Fullard, Reclamation] Will contact Kurt Dongoske, Pueblo of Zuni, to help find 

people who can assist with the peer review for cultural resources.

• [Ben Reeder, Leslie James, and Seth Shanahan] Consider developing a charge for the 

Socioeconomics Ad Hoc Group (SEAHG).

• [TWG Members] Anyone who finds non-native fish should coordinate with Brian Healy and 

Clarence Fullard.

• [Kirk Young, USFWS] Will provide a presentation on the status of the reintroduction 

assessment of Colorado pikeminnow.

• [Lee Traynham/Clarence Fullard, Reclamation] Will address the question of AMWG’s role 

to make recommendations about dam operations and the TWG’s role under the DROA rules.

Will also present on the recommendations of the May 1 DROA plan at the June TWG 

meeting. 

• [GCMRC] Can provide information on how smallmouth bass threshold conditions can be 

defined and discuss detection probabilities.

• [Unknown] Interest in hearing more about the science and river management efforts of the 

Upper Colorado Basin and the Multi-Species Conservation Plan (MSCP).

• [Josh Korman, Ecometric] To provide a presentation about modeling projections related to

rising temperature and metabolic costs to trout at a future TWG meeting.

• [Brian Healy, NPS] Will investigate further at NPS about human health effects related to 

rising water temperatures.

• [Craig Ellsworth, WAPA] Will ask Jerry Wilhite to provide more information on the 

assumptions in the bug flow cost numbers on dam operations. Will also provide an update 

on the work with Argonne to refine these cost projections. 
• [Emily Palmquist, GCMRC] Will look into how vegetation data can be used to assess wildlife 

species. 

• [TWG] Requests that the Adopt a Beach program present on the current state of the 

beaches.

• [Reclamation] To report out on the April TWG’s tabletop exercise at the June TWG meeting.

• [Reclamation] Will provide an update from the Powell fish studies efforts at the June TWG 

meeting. 

• [Kerri Pedersen, Reclamation] Will provide a presentation on the razorback sucker expert 

panel report.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 176 

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 to permit the 

collection of user fees by non-Federal entities in connection with the 

challenge cost-sharing program for management of recreation facilities, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2015 

Mr. WOMACK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 

to permit the collection of user fees by non-Federal entities in connection with the challenge cost-sharing program for management of recreation facilities, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Local Organization 

5 Cooperative Agreement for Land and Facility Mainte6 nance Act of 2015’’ or the ‘‘LOCAL Act of 2015’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 176 IH

1 SEC. 2. CHALLENGE COST-SHARING PROGRAM FOR MAN2 AGEMENT OF RECREATION FACILITIES. 

3 Section 225 of the Water Resources Development Act 

4 of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2328) is amended— 

5 (1) by redesignating subsection (c) as sub6 section (d); and 

7 (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the fol8 lowing: 

9 ‘‘(c) USER FEES.— 

10 ‘‘(1) COLLECTION OF FEES.—The Secretary 

11 may permit a non-Federal public or private entity 

12 that has entered into an agreement pursuant to sub13 section (b) to collect user fees for the use of devel14 oped recreation sites and facilities, whether devel15 oped or constructed by such entity or the Depart16 ment of the Army. 

17 ‘‘(2) USE OF FEES.—A non-Federal public or 

18 private entity collecting user fees pursuant to para19 graph (1) may— 

20 ‘‘(A) retain up to 100 percent of the fees 

21 collected, as determined by the Secretary; and 

22 ‘‘(B) use that amount, as approved by the 

23 Secretary, for operation, maintenance, and 

24 management at the recreation site where col25 lected, notwithstanding section 210(b)(4) of the 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 176 IH

1 Flood Control Act of 1968 (16 U.S.C. 460d– 

2 3(b)(4)). 

3 ‘‘(3) TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The authority 

4 of a non-Federal public or private entity under this 

5 subsection shall be subject to such terms and condi6 tions as the Secretary determines necessary to pro7 tect the interests of the United States.’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### In re MURRAY HILL BANK. In the matter of the Murray Hill Bank.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 20, 1896.)

No opinion. Motion granted. First question allowed as amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the audited
financial statements of Rental Service Corporation as of December 31, 1998 and
for the year then ended and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           3,466
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  129,087
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,857
<INVENTORY>                                     47,216
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         877,362
<DEPRECIATION>                                 153,526
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,352,576
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        808,712
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           241
<OTHER-SE>                                     417,244
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,352,576
<SALES>                                        174,289
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               578,474
<CGS>                                          132,134
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  419,167
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                53,378
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,429
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              50,375
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 51,125
<INCOME-TAX>                                    21,933
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             29,192
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    29,192
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.32
        

</TABLE>
This memorandum opinion was not selected for pub lication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 2 Plaintiff-Appellee, 3

v. NO. 33,792 4 PATRICIO ORTEGON, 5 Defendant-Appellant. 6 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CURRY COUNTY 7 Stephen K. Quinn, District Judge 8 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General 9 Santa Fe, NM 10 for Appellee 11 Jorge A. Alvarado, Chief Public Defender 12 Santa Fe, NM 13 Kirk C. Chavez, Assistant Appellate Defender 14 Hobbs, NM 15 for Appellant 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION 17 VANZI, Judge. 182 {1} Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 1 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has 2 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 3 {2} DISMISSED. 4 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 5

__________________________________ 6 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge 7 WE CONCUR: 8

_________________________________ 9 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge 10

_________________________________ 11 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge 12
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       8,865,647
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               18,881,251
<ALLOWANCES>                                   633,650
<INVENTORY>                                  1,765,152
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            32,451,836
<PP&E>                                       6,076,799
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,409,887
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              44,566,322
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,309,541
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    26,894,466
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,635,400)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                44,566,322
<SALES>                                     28,177,034
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            42,108,228
<CGS>                                        4,656,977
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,975,792
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            24,695,493
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (314,555)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,928,532
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,449,623
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,478,909
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,478,909
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.16.2

Amendment No. 1 (the "Amendment") To
Employment Agreement (the "Employment Agreement") between
Robert V. Cahill ("Employee") and Univision Communications Inc.,
which was assigned to Univision Management Co. ("Company")

Employee
and Company agree to amend the Employment Agreement as follows:

1.Term.The Term of the Employment Agreement is extended through December 31,
2007, unless earlier terminated in accordance with the provisions of the Employment Agreement.

2.Salary.The annual Base Salary rate will be Six Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars
($650,000) for the annual period from January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007.

3.Effective Date of Amendment.Upon execution by Employee and Company, this Amendment
will become effective as of December 31, 2004.

4.Other.Except as provided in this Amendment, all other terms and conditions in the
Employment Agreement will remain in full force and effect, and the Employment Agreement, as amended hereby, is ratified and confirmed.

|                                    |  | UNIVISION MANAGEMENT CO.
|----------------------------------- |  | ------------------------
|                                    |  | By:                     
|/s/ROBERT V. CAHILLRobert V. Cahill |  |                         

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>   5





<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                            9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                       SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                 389,043
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        2,935,765
<ALLOWANCES>                                            81,000
<INVENTORY>                                          5,324,102
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     9,149,827
<PP&E>                                               4,612,441
<DEPRECIATION>                                       2,883,442
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      13,882,003
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                8,122,248
<BONDS>                                              2,876,170
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                          2,237,587
<COMMON>                                                 6,107
<OTHER-SE>                                             412,220
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        13,882,003
<SALES>                                             13,508,158
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    13,508,158
<CGS>                                               11,819,176
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       11,819,176
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     509,824
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (3,829,273)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          0
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (3,829,273)
<EPS-BASIC>                                            (0.66)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            (0.66)





</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.3**

 

**LQ CORPORATION, INC.**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of LQ Corporation, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Melvyn Brunt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and 

 

2. The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated: March 29, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF HYPERION SOLUTIONS CORPORATION FOR THE
QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         222,145
<SECURITIES>                                    33,040
<RECEIVABLES>                                  120,046
<ALLOWANCES>                                    11,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               380,989
<PP&E>                                         146,269
<DEPRECIATION>                                  66,825
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 484,624
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          149,762
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            30
<OTHER-SE>                                     227,801
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   484,624
<SALES>                                        106,958
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               106,958
<CGS>                                           30,434
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   94,834
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                64,400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,282
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,748
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,648
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .28
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 10.16.3**

**AmendmentNo. 3 the “Amendment”) To**

**EmploymentAgreement (the “Employment Agreement”) between**

**Robert Cahill (“Employee”) and Univision Management Co. (“Company”)**

Employeeand Company agree to amend the Employment Agreement as follows:

1.             **Term**.  The Term of the Employment Agreement isextended through December 31, 2009, unless earlier terminated in accordancewith the provisions of the Employment Agreement.

2.             **Base****Salary**.  The annual Base Salary rate willbe Eight Hundred Twenty Five Thousand Dollars ($825,000) for the period ofthe Term from January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2009.

3.             **Effective Date of Amendment**.  Upon execution by Employee and Company, thisAmendment will become effective as of January 1, 2007.

4.             **Other**.  Except as provided in this Amendment, allother terms and conditions in the Employment Agreement will remain in fullforce and effect, and the Employment Agreement, as amended hereby, is ratifiedand confirmed.

**UNIVISIONMANAGEMENT COMPANY**

 

 
| By:    |      /s/ Andrew Hobson                                                                       |   |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   |      Andrew Hobson                                                                           |   |
|   |      SEVP, Chief Financial Officer and     Chief  Strategic Officer |   |

 

 
| By:    |      /s/ Robert Cahill |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |      Robert Cahill     |

 

----
Dismiss and Opinion Filed October 21, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-21-00648-CR

MARCO XAVIER RAMIREZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 296-82985-2020

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Molberg, Nowell, and Goldstein

Opinion by Justice Nowell

On July 20, 2021, Marco Xavier Ramirez filed a pro se notice of appeal, 

seeking to challenge his conviction for aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon. 

We dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

The clerk’s record shows that appellant, who was represented by counsel, 

entered into a negotiated plea bargain with the State. Under the terms, appellant 

agreed to plead guilty to aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon, a firearm, and 

true to the enhancement paragraph in exchange for the State’s agreement to 

recommend punishment at forty years. As further consideration for the plea bargain, 

appellant waived his right to appeal. See Blanco v. State, 18 S.W.3d 218, 219–20 
–2–

(Tex. Crim. App. 2000). The trial court accepted appellant’s guilty plea, found 

appellant guilty, and, following the plea agreement, assessed punishment, enhanced 

by a prior felony conviction, at forty years in prison. The trial court prepared and 

signed a rule 25.2(d) certification of the right to appeal stating this “is a plea-bargain 

case, and [appellant] has NO right to appeal” and appellant “has waived the right of 

appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). In addition, the trial court noted in the 

judgment, “APPEAL WAIVED. NO PERMISSION TO APPEAL GRANTED.” 

The certification is supported by the documents before the Court. See Dears v. State, 

154 S.W.3d 610, 614–15 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Because appellant waived his 

right to appeal under the clear terms of the plea agreement, we conclude we lack 

jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a), (d); Lundgren v. State, 434 S.W.3d 594, 

599 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (when appellant voluntarily waives right of appeal to 

secure benefits of plea bargain agreement, subsequent notice of appeal fails to 

“initiate the appellate process”).

We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

210648f.u05

Do Not Publish

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b)

/Erin A. Nowell//

ERIN A. NOWELL

JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

MARCO XAVIER RAMIREZ, 

Appellant

No. 05-21-00648-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 296th Judicial 

District Court, Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 296-82985-

2020.

Opinion delivered by Justice Nowell. 

Justices Molberg and Goldstein 

participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal. 

Judgment entered this 21st day of October, 2021.