alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022132EN.01021601.xml

| 24.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 132/216 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 132/216

---

P9_TA(2021)0399

Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement EU/Greenland and Denmark ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 5 October 2021 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of a Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union on the one hand, and the Government of Greenland and the Government of Denmark, on the other hand and the Implementation Protocol thereto (06566/2021 — C9-0154/2021 — 2021/0037(NLE))

(Consent)

(2022/C 132/21)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (06566/2021), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (06566/2021),

| — | having regard to the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement (SFPA) between the European Union on the one hand, and the Government of Greenland and the Government of Denmark, on the other hand and the Implementation Protocol thereto (06380/2021), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement (SFPA) between the European Union on the one hand, and the Government of Greenland and the Government of Denmark, on the other hand and the Implementation Protocol thereto (06380/2021),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 43(2) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), and Article 218(7) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C9-0073/2020), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 43(2) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), and Article 218(7) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C9-0073/2020),

| — | having regard to its non-legislative resolution of 5 October 2021 (1) on the draft decision, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to its non-legislative resolution of 5 October 2021 (1) on the draft decision,

| — | having regard to Rule 105(1) and (4) and Rule 114(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 105(1) and (4) and Rule 114(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the opinion of the Committee on Budgets, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the opinion of the Committee on Budgets,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Fisheries (A9-0233/2021), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Fisheries (A9-0233/2021),

| 1. | Gives its consent to the conclusion of the agreement and of the protocol; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of Greenland and Denmark. |
| --- | --- |

2.

---

(1)  Texts adopted, P9_TA(2021)0400.

---
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of

-- Raytheon Company and Raytheon

Missile Systems ) ) ) ) ) Under Contract No. W15P7T-07-C-P207 

### etal.) APPEARANCES FORTHE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA Nos. 61136, 61137 61138, 61139

Karen L. Manos, Esq. John W. F. Chesley, Esq. Erin N. Rankin, Esq.

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP Washington, DC E. Michael Chiaparas

DCMA ChiefTrial Attorney Stephen R. Dooley, Esq. Alexander M. Healey, Esq. Cara A. Wulf, Esq.

Trial Attorneys Defense Contract Management Agency Chantilly, VA ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute which is the subject ofthese appeals having been settled in accordance with the parties' settlement agreement, received by the Board on 8 May 2017, the appeals are hereby dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 24 May 2017


## cdministrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract AppealsI certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 61136, 61137, 61138, 61139, Appeals ofRaytheon Company and Raytheon Missile Systems, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

2 JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContractAppeals
# 3n -/r ELECTRONIC RECORD
COA# 02-12-00546-CR OFFENSE: 19.03A 

### Timothy Herringv. The State of 

### STYLE: Texas COUNTY: Wise COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRM TRIAL COURT: 271st District Court DATE: 01/1614 Publish: NO TC CASE #: CR16345



### IN THE COURTOF CRIMINALAPPEALS Timothy Herringv.The State of STYLE: Texas CCA#: 

# 374-/5* PRO <>£ Petition 

### CCA Disposition: DATE: FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: 

# fitifwCcL JUDGE: 

# DATE: ^s/f^/^P/f" SIGNED: PC: 

# JUDGE: fjU £6uLl*^ PUBLISH: DNP:
MOTION FOR REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE: ELECTRONIC RECORD
#### James Vevaina, Appellant, v Theodore J. Paccione, Respondent.

— In an action to recover damages for the intentional infliction of emotional distress, prima facie tort, malicious prosecution, and defamation, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Robbins, J.), dated July 12, 1985, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff failed to set forth sufficient factual allegations *393that the defendant’s conduct was so outrageous in character and so extreme in degree as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency, which would warrant allowing a jury to consider the cause of action to recover damages for the intentional infliction of emotional distress *(see, Murphy v American Home Prods. Corp.,*58 NY2d 293, 303-304). With respect to the cause of action to recover damages for prima facie tort, the plaintiff failed to set forth allegations of special damages with sufficient specificity to defeat a summary judgment motion, failed to demonstrate that malice was the defendant’s only motive in commencing a prior lawsuit, and improperly sought to assert a cause of action sounding in prima facie tort in order to avoid the more stringent requirement for traditional torts *(see, Curiano v Suozzi,*63 NY2d 113). The plaintiff did not meet the requirements for a cause of action sounding in malicious prosecution because he failed to set forth sufficient allegations that the prior action was terminated in his favor or that he suffered interference from a provisional remedy *(see, Ellman v McCarty,*70 AD2d 150). Finally, the statements alleged to be defamatory were made in a complaint in a prior judicial proceeding and were pertinent to that litigation. Consequently, those statements were privileged *(see, Mack v Olsen,*90 AD2d 482). Accordingly, Special Term properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed the action. Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Brown and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-10172 Conference Calendar

KIERON DEREK PENIGAR, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON INC, Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:01-CV-473-A

-------------------- August 20, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Kieron Derek Penigar, Texas prisoner # 721657, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights complaint for lack of jurisdiction. This court previously dismissed Penigar’s suit for lack of federal jurisdiction. See Penigar v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. , No. 01-10864 (5th Cir. Dec. 28, 2001)(unpublished). The law of the case doctrine bars the reexamination of an issue that this court has previously decided.No. 02-10172 -2- See Free v. Abbott Labs. Inc. , 164 F.3d 270, 271-72 (5th Cir. 1999). Penigar fails to establish any credible exception to this doctrine. See id. The dismissal of this appeal as frivolous counts as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). In addition, Penigar accumulated two strikes with the dismissal of the appeal in Penigar v. Johnson , No. 01-11290 (5th Cir. Feb. 20, 2002) (unpublished). Because he has accumulated three strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), Penigar is BARRED from proceeding in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); Carson v. Johnson , 112 F.3d 818, 819 (5th Cir. 1997).
APPEAL DISMISSED; THREE-STRIKES BAR IMPOSED.
WEBER RIVER NEAR PLAIN CITY, UTLatitude: 41.278Longitude: -112.092Elevation: 4224

WEBER RIVER NEAR PLAIN CITY, UT

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Farmington Lower Site Page...



Farmington Lower

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Lightning Ridge Site Page...



Lightning Ridge

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Lost Creek Resv Site Page...



Lost Creek Resv

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Kilfoil Creek Site Page...



Kilfoil Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Redden Mine Lwr Site Page...



Redden Mine Lwr

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Powder Mountain Site Page...



Powder Mountain

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Morgan Site Page...



Morgan

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Chicken Ridge Site Page...



Chicken Ridge

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Beaver Divide Site Page...



Beaver Divide

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Ben Lomond Peak Site Page...



Ben Lomond Peak

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Ben Lomond Trail Site Page...



Ben Lomond Trail

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Brighton Site Page...



Brighton

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Chalk Creek #1 Site Page...



Chalk Creek #1

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Chalk Creek #2 Site Page...



Chalk Creek #2

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Dry Bread Pond Site Page...



Dry Bread Pond

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Farmington Site Page...



Farmington

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Hayden Fork Site Page...



Hayden Fork

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Horse Ridge Site Page...



Horse Ridge

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Little Bear Site Page...



Little Bear

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Lookout Peak Site Page...



Lookout Peak

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Mill-D North Site Page...



Mill-D North

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Monte Cristo Site Page...



Monte Cristo

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Parleys Summit Site Page...



Parleys Summit

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Smith  Morehouse Site Page...



Smith  Morehouse

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Thaynes Canyon Site Page...



Thaynes Canyon

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Trial Lake Site Page...



Trial Lake

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Parleys Upper Site Page...



Parleys Upper

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Hardscrabble Site Page...



Hardscrabble

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Parrish Creek Site Page...



Parrish Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Louis Meadow Site Page...



Louis Meadow
CONEJOS RIVER BELOW PLATORO RESERVOIRLatitude: 37.212Longitude: -106.324Elevation: 9837

CONEJOS RIVER BELOW PLATORO RESERVOIR

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Cumbres Trestle Site Page...



Cumbres Trestle

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Lily Pond Site Page...



Lily Pond
#### Patrick Properties, LLC, as a Member of 2900 Transit Road, LLC, Suing in the Right of 2900 Transit Road, LLC, Appellant, v Kevin T. Stocker, Defendant, and Wayne Felle, Respondent.

[946 NYS2d 518]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John A. Michalek, J.), entered March 21, 2011. The order denied the motion of plaintiff for leave to renew.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated at Supreme Court. Present — Smith, J.P., Fahey, Carni, Sconiers and Martoche, JJ.
USGS 11523000 - KLAMATH R A ORLEANS, CALatitude: 41.304Longitude: -123.533Elevation: None

USGS 11523000 - KLAMATH R A ORLEANS, CA

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Annie Springs Site Page...



Annie Springs

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Crazyman Flat Site Page...



Crazyman Flat

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Swan Lake Mtn Site Page...



Swan Lake Mtn

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Sun Pass Site Page...



Sun Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Howard Prairie Site Page...



Howard Prairie

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Big Red Mountain Site Page...



Big Red Mountain

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Billie Creek Divide Site Page...



Billie Creek Divide

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Chemult Alternate Site Page...



Chemult Alternate

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Cold Springs Camp Site Page...



Cold Springs Camp

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Fourmile Lake Site Page...



Fourmile Lake

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Quartz Mountain Site Page...



Quartz Mountain

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Sevenmile Marsh Site Page...



Sevenmile Marsh

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Summer Rim Site Page...



Summer Rim

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Taylor Butte Site Page...



Taylor Butte
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Power Sports Factory, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Shawn Landgraf, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Shawn LandgrafShawn Landgraf Chief Executive
Officer


August 15, 2008
#### PEOPLE v. GOLDSTEIN.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

December 18, 1896.)

Proceeding against Gussie Gold-stein.

No opinion. Motion granted.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00038-CV

Drax Marlow, Appellant

v.

Christian Nash and Tairus, LLC, Appellees

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. C-1-CV-11-012961, HONORABLE J. DAVID PHILLIPS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Drax Marlow has filed a Motion to Dismiss Interlocutory Appeal stating

that he no longer desires to bring this appeal. He certifies that appellees’ counsel agreed to the

motion. We grant the motion and dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).

 

Jeff Rose, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Rose

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: June 20, 2013
# L_2010083EN.01001201.xml

| 30.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 83/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 83/12

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 16 February 2010

making public Recommendation 2010/190/EU with a view to ending the inconsistency with the broad guidelines of the economic policies in Greece and removing the risk of jeopardising the proper functioning of the economic and monetary union

(2010/181/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of European Union, and in particular Article 121(4) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 16 February 2010, the Council adopted Recommendation 2010/190/EU (1) with a view to ending the inconsistency with the broad guidelines of the economic policies in Greece and removing the risk of jeopardising the proper functioning of the economic and monetary union. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 16 February 2010, the Council adopted Recommendation 2010/190/EU (1) with a view to ending the inconsistency with the broad guidelines of the economic policies in Greece and removing the risk of jeopardising the proper functioning of the economic and monetary union.

| (2) | Making that Recommendation public should facilitate the coordination of the economic policies of Member States and the Union, contribute to a better understanding among economic agents and facilitate the implementation of the recommended measures, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Making that Recommendation public should facilitate the coordination of the economic policies of Member States and the Union, contribute to a better understanding among economic agents and facilitate the implementation of the recommended measures,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Recommendation 2010/190/EU with a view to ending the inconsistency with the broad guidelines of the economic policies in Greece and removing the risk of jeopardising the proper functioning of economic and monetary union shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on 16 February 2010.

Done at Brussels, 16 February 2010.

For the Council

The President

E. SALGADO

---

(1)  See page 65 of this Official Journal.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2 - Certification of Principal Financial Officer



CERTIFICATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Internet America, Inc. (the Company) for the period
ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sandra T. Everett, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Sandra T. EverettSandra T. EverettController and Chief Accounting OfficerDate: May 16, 2005
nick-ex101_25.htm



Exhibit 10.1

 

 



 

NFI Nicholas Financial Boise Idaho Grand Opening Celebration!!NFI You’re Invited to Nicholas Financial’s Boise, Idaho Grand Opening Date: June 15th 2021 Time: 3:00 to 5:00 pm  Location: 950 Fairview, Suite 170 Meridian, ID 83646 For more Info call: 208-314-5769 Official Ribbon Cutting at 4:00 pm - Refreshments will be served Proudly Serving Dealers in FL, AL, AZ, GA, ID, IL, IN, KS, KY, MI, MO, NC, NV, OH, PA,SC,TN,TX, WI, UT www.NicholasFinancial.com
#### In the Matter of Thomas B., Appellant.

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Auperin, J.), dated May 16, 1985, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court, dated April 9, 1985, made after a hearing, finding that the appellant had committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of attempted assault in the second degree, continued him on probation. The appeal brings up for review the fact-finding order dated April 9, 1985.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the evidence established the appellant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and that the fact-finding determination was not against the weight of the evidence. Mangano, J. P., Niehoff, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Jodi P. Commissioner of the New York City Department of Social Services, Respondent; John P., Appellant, et al., Respondent.

In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the father appeals from (1) an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Levine, J.), dated November 20, 1981, which, after a fact-finding hearing, granted the petition of the Commissioner of the New York City Department of Social Services and adjudged the child to be neglected, and (2) an order of disposition of the same court dated December 8, 1981, which, after a hearing, placed the child with the Commissioner for a period not in excess of one year and barred the father from visiting the child for one year.

Ordered that the appeals are dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

*159The appeals must be dismissed since the effect of the order of disposition dated December 8, 1981 was terminated over three years ago when the Family Court, Queens County (Corrado, J.), in an order dated January 9, 1984, denied the Commissioner’s petition for an extension of placement and discharged the child to her mother. The father was granted supervised visiting rights in February 1983 and the bar to unsupervised visits was lifted completely in an order dated December 12, 1983 (Corrado, J.). Were we to have reached the merits, we would have affirmed. We concur with the determination that the child was neglected for the reasons stated by Judge Levine in the Family Court. Mangano, J. P., Thompson, Brown and Eiber, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT
13.2**






Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of RADCOM Ltd. (the “Company”)
for the period ended December 31, 2004 (the “Report”), I, David Zigdon, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





****Date: March 30,
2005
    By:
    /s/ *David Zigdon*David ZigdonChief Financial
  Officer
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

I,
Barney A. Richmond, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my
knowledge, the Quarterly Report of eCom eCom.com, Inc. on
Form 10-Q for the period ended February 28, 2010, (i) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) that the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of eCom
eCom.com, Inc.



|                         |  |                              
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------------
|Date:
September 10, 2010 |  | /S/    BARNEY
A.
RICHMOND    
|                         |  | Barney A. Richmond           
|                         |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                         |  | (Principal Executive Officer)

I, Richard C. Turner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SectionSection 1350,
that, to my knowledge, the Quarterly Report of eCom eCom.com, Inc. on
Form 10-Q for the period ended February 28, 2010, (i) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) that the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of eCom
eCom.com, Inc.



|                         |  |                              
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------------
|Date:
September 10, 2010 |  | /S/    RICHARD
C.
TURNER     
|                         |  | Richard C. Turner            
|                         |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|                         |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
#### Dennis Hurley et al., Respondents, v County of Al*922bany, Defendant, and Otis Elevator Company, Appellant.

A review of the record reveals that Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant Otis Elevator Company’s motion for a protective order *(see, Allen v Crowell-Collier Pub. Co.,*21 NY2d 403). The order should therefore be affirmed.

Order affirmed, with costs. Kane, J. P., Main, Yesawich, Jr., Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.