alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SCWC-15-0000473

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

STATE OF HAWAI#I,

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

THEODORE KAWIKA KAOHU, JR.,

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-15-0000473; CR. NO. 11-1-1756)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ., 

and Circuit Judge Browning, in place of Wilson, J., recused)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Theodore Kawika Kaohu,

Jr.’s application for writ of certiorari filed on September 29,

2017, is hereby rejected. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, November 7, 2017.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ R. Mark Browning

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-15-0000473

07-NOV-2017

08:07 AM
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Harold Simmons

*Thomas J. Gorradino,*for the appellee (defendant).

*William F. Gallagher,*special assistant state’s attorney, for the appellant (state).

Argued May 9

decided May *9,*1975

The defendant’s motion to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County is denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1723 Engrossed in House (EH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1723

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To direct the Securities and Exchange Commission to revise Form S-1 so 
 as to permit smaller reporting companies to use forward incorporation 
                      by reference for such form.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Company Simple Registration 
Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. FORWARD INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE FOR FORM S-1.

    Not later than 45 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the Securities and Exchange Commission shall revise Form S-1 so as to 
permit a smaller reporting company (as defined in section 230.405 of 
title 17, Code of Federal Regulations) to incorporate by reference in a 
registration statement filed on such form any documents that such 
company files with the Commission after the effective date of such 
registration statement.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 14, 2015.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1723

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To direct the Securities and Exchange Commission to revise Form S-1 so 
 as to permit smaller reporting companies to use forward incorporation 
                      by reference for such form.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 11531]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for temporary display in the exhibition “Sophie Taeuber-Arp: Living Abstraction” at The Museum of Modern Art, New York, New York, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Chi D. Tran, Program Administrator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000.                

Matthew R. Lussenhop,

Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2021-19554 Filed 9-10-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 23, 2009

0615 

# Order

June 23, 2009

138442

DEBORAH PLUTSCHUCK, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 138442 COA: 282980 Macomb CC: 2 007-000216-NO FRANCIS MANDEL, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 3, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
NRCS 745 - SEVENMILE MARSHLatitude: 42.698Longitude: -122.142Elevation: None

NRCS 745 - Sevenmile Marsh

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Annie Springs Site Page...



Annie Springs

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Sun Pass Site Page...



Sun Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Cold Springs Camp Site Page...



Cold Springs Camp

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Sevenmile Marsh Site Page...



Sevenmile Marsh
# L_2009155EN.01001601.xml

| 18.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 155/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 155/16

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 521/2009

of 17 June 2009

on the issuing of import licences for applications lodged during the first seven days of June 2009 under the tariff quota opened by Regulation (EC) No 1382/2007 for pigmeat

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1382/2007 of 26 November 2007 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 774/94 concerning the import arrangements for pigmeat (2), and in particular Article 5(6) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EC) No 1382/2007 opened a tariff quota for imports of pigmeat products. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 1382/2007 opened a tariff quota for imports of pigmeat products.

| (2) | The applications for import licences lodged during the first seven days of June 2009 for the subperiod 1 July to 30 September 2009 do not cover the total quantity available. The quantities for which applications have not been lodged should therefore be determined and these should be added to the quantity fixed for the following quota subperiod, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The applications for import licences lodged during the first seven days of June 2009 for the subperiod 1 July to 30 September 2009 do not cover the total quantity available. The quantities for which applications have not been lodged should therefore be determined and these should be added to the quantity fixed for the following quota subperiod,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The quantities for which import licence applications covered by the quota bearing the serial number 09.4046 have not been lodged under Regulation (EC) No 1382/2007, to be added to the subperiod from 1 October to 31 December 2009, shall be 4 844 000 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 18 June 2009.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 June 2009.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1

1

(2)  
  OJ L 309, 27.11.2007, p. 28.

2

---
Exhibit
13.(a).1






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Blue Square-Israel Ltd. (the “Company”) on
Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.










By: /s/ Zeev
Vurembrand


Zeev
Vurembrand


Chief
Executive Officer







By: /s/ Dror Moran


Dror
Moran


Chief
Financial Officer






Date:
June 28, 2009
# L_2010111EN.01001901.xml

| 4.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 111/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 111/19

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 31 March 2010

appointing a member of the Court of Auditors

(2010/251/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 286(5) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Irish Government,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament,

Whereas:

| (1) | The term of office of Ms Máire GEOGHEGAN-QUINN was renewed for the period from 1 March 2006 to 29 February 2012 by Council Decision of 23 January 2006 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The term of office of Ms Máire GEOGHEGAN-QUINN was renewed for the period from 1 March 2006 to 29 February 2012 by Council Decision of 23 January 2006 (1).

| (2) | By letter of 8 February 2010 addressed to the President of the Council, Ms Máire GEOGHEGAN-QUINN presented her resignation as Member of the Court of Auditors. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

By letter of 8 February 2010 addressed to the President of the Council, Ms Máire GEOGHEGAN-QUINN presented her resignation as Member of the Court of Auditors.

| (3) | Following her resignation, it is necessary for a successor to be appointed for the remainder of her term, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Following her resignation, it is necessary for a successor to be appointed for the remainder of her term,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Eoin O'SHEA is hereby appointed a member of the Court of Auditors for the remainder of the term of office of Ms Máire GEOGHEGAN-QUINN, which runs until 29 February 2012.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 31 March 2010.

For the Council

The President

A. PÉREZ RUBALCABA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 22, 26.1.2006, p. 51.

1

---
Order filed March 3, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-21-00266-CV

____________

LARRY JOHNS, Appellant

V.

CARL R. GRANTOM AND LEIGH ANN GRANTOM, Appellees

On Appeal from the 333rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2018-42908

ORDER

When this case was reinstated on December 30, 2021, appellant was ordered 

to file his brief by January 31, 2022. On appellant’s motion, he was subsequently 

granted an extension to February 14, 2022 to file his brief. However, as of the date 

of this order, no brief or further motion to extend time has been filed. Accordingly, 

unless appellant files a brief with this court on or before March 24, 2022, the court 

will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Jewell, Zimmerer, and Hassan.
#### SULLIVAN v. UNION RY. CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July, 1896.)

Action by Edward Sullivan against the Union Railway Company.

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs. See 40 N. Y. Supp,

84.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Pedro Ospina, Appellant.

Mangano, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

Informational Addendum to Report on Form 10-Q

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

Not Filed Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

The undersigned Chief Financial Officer of OYO Geospace Corporation does hereby certify as follows:

Solely for the purpose of meeting the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and solely to the extent this certification may
be applicable to this Report on Form 10-Q, the undersigned hereby certify that this Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in this
Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OYO Geospace Corporation.



/s/ Thomas T. McEntireName:    Thomas T. McEntireTitle:      Chief Financial OfficerAugust 1, 2006
## 2009 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit 3-13-2009 

# Z he n g v . Atty Ge n U SA P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : N on-P r e c e de n t i al D ocke t N o . 06-4681

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2009

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2009 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. F or mor e infor m at ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min . C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du . 

## Re c omme nde d C it at ion " Z he n g v . Att y Ge n U SA" (2009). 2009 D e cisio n s . P ape r 1744. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2009/1744

## UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 06-4681 Zheng v. Attorney General ORDER AMENDING OPINION IT IS HEREBY ORDERED at the direction of the Court that the Opinion in the above case, filed February 11, 2009, be amended as follows: Page 18 shall read: III . For all of the above reasons, we will deny the petition for review.
For the Court, /s/ Marcia M. Waldron Clerk Dated:March 13, 2009 PDB/cc: Isaac Fromm, Esq. Daniel B. Lundy, Esq. John J. W. Inkeles, Esq.
Exhibit 4.2


 


Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm


We have issued our report
dated June 11, 2021, with respect to the financial statement of Advisors Disciplined Trust 2073 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-256198) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration
Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Experts”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


June 11, 2021
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-14-0000897

22-OCT-2015

08:40 AM
**Exhibit 10.12.3**

 

**Amendment No. 12 (the “Amendment”)ToEmployment Agreement (the “Employment Agreement”) betweenRay Rodriguez (“Employee”) and The Univision Network Limited Partnership (“Company”)**

 

Employee and Companyagree to amend the Employment Agreement as follows:

 

1.                                       **Term**.  The Term of the Employment Agreement isextended through December 31, 2008, unless earlier terminated inaccordance with the provisions of the Employment Agreement.

 

2.                                       **Salary**.  The annual Base Salary rate will be OneMillion Dollars ($1,000,000) for the annual period of the Term from January 1,2006 through December 31, 2006; One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) for theannual period of the Term from January 1, 2007 through December 31,2007; and One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) for the annual period of the Termfrom January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008.

 

3.                                       **Effective Date of Amendment**.  Upon execution by Employee and Company, thisAmendment will become effective as of December 31, 2005.

 

4.                                       **Other**.  Except as provided in this Amendment, allother terms and conditions in the Employment Agreement will remain in fullforce and effect, and the Employment Agreement, as amended hereby, is ratifiedand confirmed.

 
| ** **         | **THE  UNIVISION NETWORK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP** |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------|
|               |                                           |
|               |                                           |
|               | By:                                            | /s/ ROBERT V.  CAHILL |   |
|               |                                           | Robert V. Cahill |
|               |                                           | Secretary |
|               |                                           |   |
| /s/ RAY  RODRIGUEZ |                                           |
| Ray Rodriguez      |                                           |
|                    |                                                |  |  |  |

 

----
1 – OPINION AND ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

PORTLAND DIVISION

BRANDON MOYE, SR. No. 3:16-cv-00354-MO

OPINION AND ORDER

Plaintiff, 

v. 

BETH CREIGHTON, and 

CREIGHTON & ROSE, 

 Defendants. 

MOSMAN, J., 

Pro se plaintiff filed a Complaint [2] alleging fraud. Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File 

Amended Complaint [6] raises claims of “fraud, forgery, perjury, theft by deception, professional 

misconduct, malpractice and more.” For the following reasons, I DISMISS the case for lack of 

subject matter jurisdiction and DENY AS MOOT any pending motions. . 

DISCUSSION

Federal courts have subject matter jurisdiction only as authorized by the Constitution and 

Congress. U.S. Const. art. III, § 2, cl. 1; see also Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 

U.S. 375, 377 (1994). Federal courts have jurisdiction where an action arises under federal law, 

28 U.S.C. § 1331, or where each plaintiff’s citizenship is diverse from each defendant’s 

Case 3:16-cv-00354-MO Document 7 Filed 04/08/16 Page 1 of 2
2 – OPINION AND ORDER

citizenship and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, id. § 1332(a). The court may dismiss 

the action sua sponte where the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. Franklin v. State of Or., 

State Welfare Div., 662 F.2d 1342 1341 (9th Cir. 1981) (citing Cal. Diversified Promotions, Inc. 

v. Musick, 505 F.2d 278, 280 (9th Cir. 1974)). Moreover, where the court lacks subject matter 

jurisdiction, it is “not required to issue a summons or follow the other procedural steps.” Loux v. 

Rhay, 375 F.2d 55, 58 (9th Cir. 1967). 

In his complaint, Plaintiff claimed this Court had jurisdiction based on a federal question. 

However, Plaintiff has not alleged a cause of action under federal law, but instead brings claims 

for state law violations. Thus, there is no federal question jurisdiction. Plaintiff does not allege, 

nor is it apparent from the face of his complaint, that there is diversity jurisdiction. Thus, this 

court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff cannot pursue his claims in federal court, 

although he may be able to seek relief in state court. 

CONCLUSION

Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 

Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend Complaint [6] is DENIED AS MOOT. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 8th day of April, 2016. 

 

 /s/ Michael W. Mosman 

MICHAEL W. MOSMAN

Chief United States District Judge

Case 3:16-cv-00354-MO Document 7 Filed 04/08/16 Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 21**

 

**SUBSIDIARIES**

 
| **Name**                             | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of Incorporation  or Organization** | ** ** | **Other Name under which  Business is Conducted** |
|--------------------------------------|------------|----------------------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------------------------------|
| U.S. Rubber  Reclaiming, Inc.   |       | Indiana                                            |       | None                                              |
| Pyramid  Coach, Inc.            |       | Tennessee                                          |       | None                                              |
| Danzer  Industries, Inc.        |       | Maryland                                           |       | None                                              |
| United Expressline, Inc.        |       | Indiana                                            |       | United  Trailers and Southwest Trailers           |
| Obsidian  Leasing Company, Inc. |       | Mississippi                                        |       | None                                              |
| Classic  Manufacturing, Inc.    |       | Michigan                                           |       | Classic  Trailers                                 |

 

1

----