alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-18-00152-CR

MICHAEL SCOTT CHASTAIN,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 220th District Court

Bosque County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR15457

ORDER

Appellant’s brief was originally due on or before October 18, 2018. When no brief 

was filed on that date, the Court notified appellant by letter dated October 25, 2018 that 

the brief was late and that, unless a brief or satisfactory response was received within 

fourteen days, the Court would abate the appeal and order the trial court to immediately 

conduct a hearing pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(b)(2) and (3). See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). No brief was filed, but on November 27, 2018, appellant 

filed a motion for extension of time to file her brief. 
Chastain v. State Page 2

Before we ruled on appellant’s motion, the trial court sua sponte held a hearing 

regarding appellant’s failure to timely file a brief. Appellant’s attorney told the trial court 

that appellant’s brief would be filed on November 30, 2018. The trial court directed that 

a copy of the reporter’s record from that proceeding be filed with this Court. Appellant’s 

brief was not filed on November 30, 2018.

We thereafter granted appellant’s motion for extension of time and directed that 

appellant’s brief be filed no later than January 3, 2019. Appellant was also warned that 

no further extensions would be entertained absent extraordinary circumstances. 

Appellant has now filed an additional motion to extend time to file appellant’s brief until 

January 13, 2019. 

An extension of time until January 13, 2019 would be a total of 147 days to file the 

brief. The Rules of Appellate Procedure establish the norm that a brief should be filed in 

30 days. Id. at 38.6(a). Accordingly, appellant’s motion for an extension of time to file 

appellant’s brief is only partially granted. Appellant’s brief is due no later than January 

11, 2019. If appellant’s brief is not filed by January 11, 2019, we will abate this appeal and 

order the trial court to immediately conduct a hearing pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2) & (3). 

Id.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Order issued and filed January 2, 2019
**EXHIBIT 21**

**INTEGRATED BIOPHARMA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES                  SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**         

InB:Manhattan Drug Company, Inc.        Gero Industries, Inc.-Inactive        Scientific Sports Nutrition, Inc. (f/k/a Media Consultants, Inc.)        Vitamin Factory, Inc.        Connaught Press, Inc.-Inactive        Designer Nutrition Labs, Inc.-Inactive        Liquifill, Inc.-Inactive        AgroLabs, Inc.        The Organic Beverage Company (f/k/a Bioscience Technologies, Inc.)        IHT Health Products, Inc.        IHT Properties, Inc.        InB:Biotechnologies, Inc. (f/k/a NuCycle Therapy, Inc.)        InB:Paxis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (f/k/a Paxis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.)

InB:Hauser Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. (f/k/a Hauser Technical Services, Inc.)

*INB:Biotechnologies, Inc. was spun-off subsequent to the Company’s fiscal year end June 30, 2008
Exhibit 10.4

 

	

    	
50 Tice Boulevard
   Suite A26
   Woodcliff Lake, NJ 07677
   (201) 645-4765 (tel)
    


 

March 31, 2020

 

Michael Derby

 

Subject: Derby Employment Offer

 

Dear Michael,

 

On behalf of Timber Pharmaceuticals LLC (“Timber” or the “Company”), I am pleased to extend to you an offer of employment for the role of Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors. This position will be located at Timber’s current headquarters at 50 Tice Boulevard, Suite A26, Woodcliff Lake, NJ 07677. You will report to the Company’s Board of Directors. Your start date will be mutually determined, but I anticipate it to be on or around May 1, 2020. I am excited about the possibility of you joining the team and your helping to build our high value medical dermatology company.

 

The terms of your employment offer are outlined below:

 

·                  Part-time employment, up to 20 hours per week, as required.

·                  Initial monthly base pay of $17,500 which, when annualized, is equivalent to $210,000 per year.

·                  Participation (pro-rated for 2020) in a Performance Bonus Plan with a target of 30% of your base salary, based on company and individual achievement. Your bonus will be based on your performance meeting mutually established individual goals and objectives to support the growth strategy of the Company as well as the Company’s overall performance.

·                  100% reimbursement of all health, dental and vision insurance benefit plan expenses that you may incur separate from your employment with the Company.

 

This offer of employment pursuant to the above terms shall remain in effect for two years from your start date, with automatic one-year renewals, unless terminated sooner either by you or the Company.

 

If you understand and accept these terms, please sign and return one copy of this offer letter to me.

 

Confidential

 

1











 

I would love to have you join the Timber team and be a part of building a great company. Should you have any questions regarding this offer, please feel free to contact me at: 973-452-8548.

 

	
Sincerely,
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/ John V. Koconis
    	
 
    
	
John V. Koconis
    	
 
    
	
Chief Executive Officer
    	
 
    
	
Timber Pharmaceuticals   LLC
    	
 
    


 

Agreed to and Accepted by:

 

	
/s/ Michael   Derby
    	
 
    	
04/23/2020
    
	
Michael Derby
    	
 
    	
Date
    


 

Confidential

 

2
1
Science Advisors Program

 Provide independent reviews of 

science and management plans and 

management actions 

 Provide advisory service to AMWG, 

TWG, GCMRC and Secretary

2
Types of SA Reviews: Primarily 

GCMRC Science Plans

 RFPs

 Scientific protocols

 Long term monitoring plans

 Strategic and biannual science plans 

and budgets

 TWG and AMWG management program 

plans/proposals

3
Types of SA Service

 Attend and provide SA perspectives at 

AMWG, TWG, GCMRC meetings and 

workshops

 Provide leadership for or participate in 

GCDAMP committees and Ad Hoc 

Groups

 Develop reports on GCDAMP issues of 

concern or interest

 Respond to information needs of 

entities/members 

4
 Review of draft 2013-14 Biannual Program and 

Budget for TWG

 Review of 2013-14 Biannual Plan and Budget for 

GCMRC

 Review of Socio-economic/Hydropower Section 

of KA 

 Attendance and participation in 

AMWG/TWG/GCMRC Program meetings

 TWG Presentation: SA 2012 Annual Report

 TWG presentation: Review of draft 2013-14 Plan

 TWG and AMWG PPTs: Presentations on 

SEAHG and SE Programs

5
 TWG and AMWG Presentations: SA review of 

Biannual Work Plan

 TWG/BAHG/SEAHG Conference calls 

 SA briefing documents on DSS and SEAHG 

Reports; TWG draft 2013-14 Plan review; final 

2013-14 plan review.

 Participation in meeting on EIS Alternatives.

 Participation in HFE program at GCD.

6
 Assist SEAHG members in review and 

assessment of approaches to non-market 

assessments using expert panels

 Assist SEAHG members in evaluating Delphi 

approaches for defining resource values

 Develop and present TWG Workshop on 

SEAHG Programs

 Screen, evaluate, interview and recommend 

candidates for SA Cultural Resource position

7
Potential SA Review and Service; 2014 

 Review of draft 2014 Annual Work Plan, activities, 

budget

 Review of KA and SCORE Sections

 Review of CMP Management/Science Approach

 Review of integrated aquatic food base, Lake 

Powell, downstream water quality Core Monitoring 

Plans 

 Review of Native and Non-native Fish Core 

Monitoring Plan

8
Potential 2014 SA Review/Service; 

Continued

9

 Review of Vegetation Monitoring Plan

 Review Socioeconomic Program Plan

 Review Low Summer Steady Flows Synthesis Report

 Review Five Year Strategic Science Plan
Potential Science Advisors 

Review/Service; 2014

10

 Attend and provide SA perspectives at 

TWG/GCMRC/AMWG meetings

 Provide SA perspectives in GCDAMP workshops

 Participate in BAHG processes

 Participate in annual GCMRC/TWG science and 

management reporting mtg. 
Potential 2014 SA Review/Service; 

Continued

11

 Provide Chair in SEAHG on program 

development/reports

 Provided service assistance to GCMRC science 

programs as requested

 Provide assistance to TWG/AMWG management 

programs as requested 
Areas of Proposed Emphasis by SAs

12

 Developing Status of Knowledge Reports to assist 

EIS/LTEMP process

 Develop strategy and CMPs to assist LTEMP process

 Developing improved resource values to assist 

EIS/LTEMP process
U.S. Department of the Interior

U.S. Geological Survey

Taking of Life Inventory

Technical Work Group Meeting

January 22, 2021

Michael Moran and Scott VanderKooi

Southwest Biological Science Center

Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center
2020 Take of Fish

* Includes all fish taken by USGS, AGFD, and USFWS

1 Does not include any GSF removed from -12-Mile Slough by NPS

2 Mostly small juveniles

– Required to 

be taken 

under NPS 

permit/CFMP

USGS Preliminary Data, 2021. Do Not Cite. Jan. 22, 2021
2020 Take of Invertebrates 

and Plants

982,078 invertebrates*

• Midges - mostly

• Caddisflies

5 plants

(*From samples processed as of Dec. 31, 2020)

USGS Preliminary Data, 2021. Do Not Cite. 

Jan. 22, 2021
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

             DIVALL INSURED INCOME PROPERTIES 2 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

                   Certification of Periodic Financial Report
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

        Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Divall Insured
Income Properties 2 Limited Partnership (the "Company") certifies that the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-K
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

                               THE PROVO GROUP, INC., General Partner

Dated:   May 15, 2003     By     /s/ Bruce A. Provo
                            -------------------------------------------
                                 President, Chief Executive Officer and
                                 Chief Financial Officer

        This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
#### MORRISON, Appellant, v. MORRISON et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

December 30, 1896.)

Action by Henry Morrison against Joseph Morrison and Eliza Morrison.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Carroll v. Collins, 6 App. Div. 106, 40 N. Y. Supp. 54.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Everton Dunn, Appellant.

The defendant contends that the evidence adduced at the trial with regard to one of the two complainants failed to establish the element of forcible compulsion required to convict him of the charges of rape in the first degree *(see,*Penal Law § 130.35 [1]) and sodomy in the first degree *(see,*Penal Law § 130.50 [1]) applicable to that complainant. We do not agree. Considering all of the surrounding circumstances *(see, People v Vicaretti,*54 AD2d 236), and viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People *(see, People v Walstatter,*53 NY2d 871), it was sufficient in quality and quantity for the jury to have reasonably found that the actions of the defendant and his accomplices constituted "a threat, express or implied, that place[d] [the complainant] in fear of immedi*818ate death or serious physical injury” *(see,*Penal Law former § 130.00 [8], now § 130.00 [8] [b]; *cf. People v Fuller,*50 NY2d 628, 631; *People v Dickson,*112 AD2d 312; *People v Bermudez,*109 AD2d 674).

The defendant’s remaining contentions lack merit. Mangano, J. P., Weinstein, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.
EX-4.1





 Exhibit 4.1 
  





 
 VINTAGE WINE ESTATES, INC. (INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA) THIS CERTIFIES THAT * * SPECIMEN * * NUMBER CERT.9999
SHARES **9,000,000,000***** ***9,000,000’000**** ****9,000,000,000*** *****9,000,000,000** ******9,000,000’000* is the registered owner of CUSIP: 92747V106 ISIN: US92747V1061 * NINE BILLION AND 00/100 * FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE COMMON SHARES IN THE CAPITAL OF VINTAGE WINE ESTATES, INC. transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the registered holder in person or by duly authorized Attorney on surrender of this
Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid until countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar of the Corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly
authorized officers. DATED: JANUARY 01,2009 COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED by TSX Trust Company Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Transfer agent and Registrar COUNTERSIGNED by Continental Stock Transfer &
Trust Co. 1 State Street, 30th Floor New York, NY 10004 Co-Transfer Agent By AUTHORIZED OFFICER By AUTHORIZED OFFICER Patrick Roney Chief Executive Officer Kathy DeVillers Chief Financial Officer The Shares
represented by this Certificate are transferable at the offices of TSX Trust Company, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and at the offices of Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, New York, New York, USA SECURITY INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE VOIR LES
INSTRUCTIONS DE SECURITE AU VERSO 6239026 












 



 
 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, hereby sell, assign and transfer unto PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL INSURANCE NUMBER OF TRANSFEREE (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE
NAME AND ADDRESS OF ASSIGNEE) —————————————-‘Shares of the Capilal Stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint Attorney to
transfer the said Stock on the Books of the within named Corporation, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: Signature: NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITIEN UPON THE FACE OF THE
CERTIFICATE, IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT, OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER, AND MUST BE GUARANTEED BY A SCHEDULE 1 CANADIAN CHARTERED BANK OR AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE
MEDALLION PROGRAM. Guaranteed by: 999999 ACCT9999 TIR5405 CERT.9999 RESTRICTIONS SECURITY INSTRUCTIONS - INSTRUCTIONS DE SECURITE THIS IS WATERMARKED PAPER DO NOT ACCEPT WITHOUT NOTHING WATERMARK. HOLD TO LIGHT TO VERIFY WATERMARK. PAPIER FILIGRANE,
NE PAS ACCEPTER SANS VERIFIER LA PRESENCE DU FILIGRANE. POUR CE FAIRE, PLACER A LA LUMIERE.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-15-00081-CR

IN RE Carlton STROUD

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 4, 2015

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On February 18, 2015, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has 

considered relator’s petition and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. 

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 1997CR3770, styled The State of Texas v. Carlton Stroud, pending in the 

290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Melisa Skinner presiding.
#### Alabama Great Southern Railroad Co. *v.*Reed.

Appeal from DeKalb Circuit Court

Tried before tlie Hon. J. A. Bilbro.

Amos E. Goodhue, for appellant.

Davis & Haralson, for appellee.

This was a suit brought by the appellant against the appellee to recover certain taxes paid by the plaintiff to the defendant as tax collector of DeKalb county under protest. The plaintiff attacks the constitutionality of the acts of the legislature authorizing the levy, and also the levy made by the commissioner’s court of said county, under which the taxes were collected by defendant. Acts of 1892-93, p. 312.

There was judgment for. the defendant and the plaintiff appeals. The judgment is affirmed on the authority of the *Southern Railway*Co. *v. St. Clair*County, 124 Ala. 491.

Opinion by

McClellan, C. J.
Exhibit
4.16


 


PROMISSORY
NOTE


 


FOR
VALUE RECEIVED, Grapefruit Boulevard Investments, Inc., a California cotporation, (“Borrower”) promises to pay
to the order of David Yourist (“Lender”) or its assigns, the sum of Forty
Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($40,000.00) in principal, plus interest at a rate of 10% annually on the unpaid balance
as set forth herein.


 


	 	1.	PAYMENT
    TERMS: Borrower shall pay a lump sum on October 1, 2019 or before.
	 	 	 
	 	2.	PREPAYMENT:
    Borrower may prepay the loan without any penalty.
	 	 	 
	 	3.	PAYMENT
    APPLICATION; All payments shall first be applied to interest and then to principal.
	 	 	 
	 	4.	ATTORNEYS’
    FEES AND COSTS: If the Lender prevails in any action to collect on this note, Borrower shall pay Lender’s reasonable
    costs and attorneys’ fees.
	 	 	 
	 	5.	STATE
    LAW: This note shall be governed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.
	 	 	 
	 	6.	MODIFICATIONS:
    Any modifications of or amendments to the terms herein shall be made in writing by all of the parties hereto.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF the Lender and Borrower have executed this Note as of the 1st day of May, 2019.


 


	GRAPEFRUIT
    BOULEVARD INVESTMENTS, INC.	 
	 	 
	/s/
    Bradley J. Yourist	 
	Borrower
    Signature: Bradley J. Yourist, CEO	 
	 	 
	/s/
    David Yourist	 
	Lender
    Signature: David Yourist	 


 


confidential
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2008 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for clarification regarding 

the children to whom entitlement to educational assistance may be transferred under the Post-9/11 Educational Assistance Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 23, 2015 

Mr. FOSTER (for himself and Mrs. MCMORRIS RODGERS) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for clarification regarding the children to whom entitlement to 

educational assistance may be transferred under the 

Post-9/11 Educational Assistance Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘GI Education Benefit 

5 Fairness Act’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 2008 IH

1 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION REGARDING THE CHILDREN TO 

2 WHOM ENTITLEMENT TO EDUCATIONAL AS3 SISTANCE MAY BE TRANSFERRED UNDER 

4 THE POST-9/11 EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE 

5 PROGRAM. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3319(c) of title 38, 

7 United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 

8 ‘‘(c) ELIGIBLE DEPENDENTS.— 

9 ‘‘(1) TRANSFER.—An individual approved to 

10 transfer an entitlement to educational assistance 

11 under this section may transfer the individual’s enti12 tlement as follows: 

13 ‘‘(A) To the individual’s spouse. 

14 ‘‘(B) To one or more of the individual’s 

15 children. 

16 ‘‘(C) To a combination of the individuals 

17 referred to in subparagraphs (A) and (B). 

18 ‘‘(2) DEFINITION OF CHILDREN.—For purposes 

19 of this subsection, the term ‘children’ includes de20 pendents described in section 1072(2)(I) of title 

21 10.’’. 

22 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by sub23 section (a) shall apply with respect to educational assist24 ance payable under chapter 33 of title 38, United States 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•HR 2008 IH

1 Code, before, on, or after the date of the enactment of 

2 this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint.

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

District of Oregon

fl1⁄2 ́3ao ‘‘›

ÌÊÔÍÛ1⁄2TMÛððÓÏÌ

flÆ ̈ ̧Æa®Ù ×21⁄2Ú

flÆ ̈ ̧Æa®Ù ×21⁄2Ú

1⁄2Ò± Œa1·­ ̈aÆao fl1a2 ̈ Œa·2 ̧±¥o Õ1⁄2 ̧3·ao·21

ÔÌÈð ›Æaaμ­·oa fi± ́¥aTMøÆo

“ø°¥a­Ù ⁄¥±Æ·oø ÌÏÔðË

Õ ̧ø©2 ÷Ú ’±¥· ̈1⁄2 ̧

’—‘×Õ›ÿ ÿflŒÃ...¤‘‘Ù –Ú›Ú

ÎÓð ÕÚ...Ú «ø3 ̧·¥¥ Õ ̈Æaa ̈Ù Õ ́· ̈a Óðð

–±Æ ̈¥ø2oÙ —Æa1±2 ÁÈÓðÏ

-SB

02/09/2016 By: s/D. St. Germain, Deputy Clerk

Case 3:16-cv-00243-SB Document 4 Filed 02/09/16 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

ÌÊÔÍÛ1⁄2TMÛððÓÏÌ

ðÚðð

Case 3:16-cv-00243-SB Document 4 Filed 02/09/16 Page 2 of 2
#### IN RE CRABTREE’S WILL.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 16, 1896.)

Petition of the executors of the last will and testament of William Crabtree, deceased, for a judicial settlement of their accounts.

No opinion. Motion denied, without costs. Decision made by the concurrence of all. See 40 N. Y. Supp. 1148.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

January 30, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129624 & (13) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

CYD C. LUCAS,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 129624 

 COA: 261799 

WCAC: 04-000018 

MICHIGAN BELL (AMERITECH SERVICES, 

INC.), 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 23, 2005 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to 

dismiss is DENIED. 

t0123 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 30, 2006 

Clerk