alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 14, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 51168]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19760]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group; 
NHLBI Single-Site and Pilot Clinical Trials Study Section.
    Date: October 27-28, 2021.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20817 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: YingYing Li-Smerin, M.D., Ph.D., Scientific 
Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, 
Lung, and Blood Institute, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Room 207-P, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, 301-827-7942, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#45292c362820372c2b052b2d29272c6b2b2c2d6b222a33"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="563a3f253b33243f3816383e3a343f78383f3e78313920">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 8, 2021.
David W. Freeman,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-19760 Filed 9-13-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### BULKLEY et al., Respondents, v. Little, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 13, 1896.)

Action by Jonathan Bulkley and others against Joseph J. Little, as receiver of the Worthington Company.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.
PAGE 1 – ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

COBBLER NEVADA, LLC and CLEAR 

SKIES NEVADA, LLC,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SHAWNA MOSS,

Defendant.

Case No. 3:15-1915-SB

ORDER

Michael H. Simon, District Judge.

United States Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman issued Findings and 

Recommendation in this case on December 19, 2016. ECF 45. Judge Beckerman recommended 

that Plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment be granted and a default judgment be entered in the 

amount of statutory damages of $750 for each Plaintiff. No party has filed objections.

Under the Federal Magistrates Act (“Act”), the court may “accept, reject, or modify, in 

whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(1). If a party files objections to a magistrate’s findings and recommendations, “the court 

shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings 

or recommendations to which objection is made.” Id.; Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3).

If no party objects, the Act does not prescribe any standard of review. See Thomas v. 

Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 152 (1985) (“There is no indication that Congress, in enacting [the Act], 

Case 3:15-cv-01915-SB Document 48 Filed 01/19/17 Page 1 of 2
PAGE 2 – ORDER

intended to require a district judge to review a magistrate’s report to which no objections are 

filed.”); United States. v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (holding 

that the court must review de novo magistrate’s findings and recommendations if objection is 

made, “but not otherwise”). 

Although review is not required in the absence of objections, the Act “does not preclude 

further review by the district judge[] sua sponte . . . under a de novo or any other standard.” 

Thomas, 474 U.S. at 154. Indeed, the Advisory Committee Notes to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) 

recommend that “[w]hen no timely objection is filed,” the court review the magistrate’s findings 

and recommendations for “clear error on the face of the record.”

No party having made objections, this Court follows the recommendation of the Advisory 

Committee and reviews Judge Beckerman’s Findings and Recommendation for clear error on the 

face of the record. No such error is apparent. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS Judge 

Beckerman’s Findings and Recommendation, ECF 45. Plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment 

(ECF 41) is GRANTED. A judgment will be entered against Defendant, permanently enjoining 

her from infringing Plaintiffs’ rights in the movies The Cobbler and Good Kill and awarding 

$750 in statutory damages to each Plaintiff.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 19th day of January, 2017.

/s/ Michael H. Simon

Michael H. Simon

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-01915-SB Document 48 Filed 01/19/17 Page 2 of 2
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
      This schedule contains summary information extracted from the condolidated
balance sheet and the consolidated statement of operations and is qualified in 
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
                         
                      

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              jun-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   jun-30-1997
<CASH>                                         1,010,256
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,464,708
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    2,086,366
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               6,331,092
<PP&E>                                         1,072,049
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 8,140,648
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,298,690
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       8,670
<OTHER-SE>                                     5,322,673
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   8,140,648
<SALES>                                        11,126,860
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               11,126,860
<CGS>                                          9,475,624
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,546,972
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (95,207)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             99,795
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (900,324)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (246,020)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (654,304)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   9654,304)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.16)
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated statement of operations for the nine months ended September 30,
2000 and the consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2000 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.

                   Appendix A to Item 601(c) of Regulation S-K
                       Commercial and Industrial Companies
                           Article 5 of Regulation S-X

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                            435
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  30,790
<ALLOWANCES>                                    2,357
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               32,335
<PP&E>                                         18,365
<DEPRECIATION>                                (12,751)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 66,939
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          31,475
<BONDS>                                           350
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            7
<OTHER-SE>                                     16,496
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   66,939
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              177,543
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 138,076
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                1,252
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              2,824
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,443)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (577)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (866)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (866)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.12)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 15.2







Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




The Board of Directors


RADCOM Ltd.:




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-07964, No. 333-13244, No. 333-13246, No. 333-13248, No. 333-13250, No. 333-13252, No. 333-13254, No. 333-14236, No. 333-111931 and No. 333-123981) pertaining to The Directors’ Share Option Plan, The Radcom Ltd. 1998 Share Option Plan, The Radcom Ltd. 1998 Employees Bonus Plan, The Radcom Ltd. International Employee Stock Option Plan, The 2000 Share Option Plan, The 2001 Share Option Plan and The 2003 Share Option Plan and Form F-3 (File No. 333-152848 and No. 333-170512) of the Company and in the related Prospectus of our report dated April 4, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of RADCOM Ltd. and subsidiaries included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010.





Tel-Aviv, Israel
/s/Kost Forer Gabbay & KasiererApril 4, 2011
Kost Forer Gabbay & KasiererA Member of Ernst & Young Global
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Victor J. Licitra, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the County Court, Westchester County (Marasco, J.), rendered November 19, 1981, upon his conviction, *inter alia,*of driving while intoxicated.

Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.

By judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Tomlinson, J.), rendered March 21, 1980, the defendant was convicted, *inter alia,*of driving while intoxicated.

By order of this court dated October 5, 1981, the judgment was modified by vacating the sentence, and as so modified, it was affirmed and the matter was remitted to the County Court, Westchester County, for resentencing *(see, People v Licitra,*84 AD2d 539). The defendant was resentenced by the same court on November 19, 1981.

The defendant has appealed from the resentence, raising, *inter alia,*claims relating to the underlying judgment of conviction. The defendant’s contentions were either decided against him on the prior appeal *(see, People v Licitra, supra)*or could have been raised on that prior appeal. In any event, there is no merit to the defendant’s claim that actions by the hearing court precluded the indictment herein *(see, People v Aaron,*55 AD2d 653).

The defendant’s claim that this resentencing constitutes *593double jeopardy is without merit *(People v Maldonado,*82 AD2d 576). Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Lawrence, Kooper and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
MICHAELR. SNEDEKER 

Snedeker, Smith & Short 

PMB 422, 4110 S.E. Hawthorne Blvd. 

Portland, Oregon 97214 

Telephone: (503) 234-3584 

Fax: (503) 232-3215 

e-mail: m.snedeker@comcast.net 

ELLEN C. PITCHER 

Attorney at Law 

0324 Abernethy St. 

Portland, OR 97239 

(971) 717-6579 

email: ellenpitcherlaw@yahoo.com 

Attorneys for Petitioner 

MATTHEW DWIGHT THOMPSON 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

EUGENE DIVISION 

MATTHEW DWIGHT THOMPSON Case No.: 6:15-cv-01313-AA 

Petitioner, 

v. 

JEFF PREMO, 

Superintendent, Oregon State 

Penitentiary, 

Respondent. 

DEATH PENALTY CASE 

ORDER REGARDING DATE 

FOR FILING THE INITIAL 

PETITION FOR WRIT OF 

HABEAS CORPUS PURSUANT 

TO 28 U.S.C. §2254 

Upon Motion of Petitioner Matthew Dwight Thompson, by and 

through his attorneys Michael R. Snedeker and Ellen C. Pitcher, this case 

Case 6:15-cv-01313-AA Document 31 Filed 10/18/16 Page 1 of 2
came before the Court regarding the due date for the filing of the initial 

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In 

light of issues including the completion of the filing of the state court 

record pursuant to Rule 81-3(i) of the Local Rules of Practice for the 

United States District Court for the District of Oregon, and receipt of 

the notification by counsel for Respondent, through Assistant Attorney 

General David Thompson, that they do not oppose counsel for 

Petitioner's requested due date, it is hereby ORDERED that: 

The initial Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is to be filed on or before 

December 1, 2016, and that any petition filed on that date will be deemed 

timely pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 2244( d). 

Signed this !!_ day of October, 2016. 

----~-~--- ANN AIKEN 

United States District Judge 

Proposed by: 

s/ Ellen C Pitcher 

Ellen C.Pitcher 

Of Attorneys for Petitioner 

Case 6:15-cv-01313-AA Document 31 Filed 10/18/16 Page 2 of 2
#### PEOPLE v. GARRETT.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 15, 1897.)

Proceeding against Henry D. Garrett.

No opinion. Motion denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
financial statement of First Industrial Securities, L.P. for the three months 
ended March 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             878
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      564
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (50)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,392
<PP&E>                                          76,264
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,099)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  75,460
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              842
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      74,145
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    75,460
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,879
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    (904)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (447)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,528
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,528
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,528
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION OF OFFICERS
                          OF US GLOBAL NANOSPACE, INC.
                            PURSUANT TO 18 USCss.1350


      Pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) each of the
undersigned  officers of US Global  Nanospace,  Inc. (the "Company") does hereby
certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

            (a) The  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June
30, 2004 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (b) Information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  August 23, 2004

/s/ John Robinson
------------------------
John Robinson,
Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Julie Seaman
------------------------
Julie Seaman,
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Impac Mortgage
Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates
indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    Joseph R. Tomkinson

Joseph R. Tomkinson

Chief Executive Officer



May 3, 2004



/s/    Richard J. Johnson

Richard J. Johnson

Chief Financial Officer



May 3, 2004



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Impac Mortgage Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Impac
Mortgage Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Florin HORICIANU, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-10303.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 16, 2007 *.

Filed April 18, 2007.

Mark L. Krotoski, USSJ—Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Jose, CA, for PlaintiffAppellee.

John J. Jordan, Esq., San Francisco, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CLIFTON and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Florin Horicianu appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and sentence imposed for transmitting interstate threatening communications, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 875(c).

Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Horicianu’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Horicianu has filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Because our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 82-83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), indicates that Horicianu knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal and was sentenced within the terms of the plea agreement, we enforce the waiver and dismiss the appeal. *See United States v. Nguyen,*235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2000) (stating that an appeal waiver is valid when it is entered knowingly and voluntarily).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

The appeal is DISMISSED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### PEOPLE v. GILES et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 15, 1897.)

No opinion. Motion denied. See 42 N. Y. Supp. 749.
**Exhibit
      23.1**








**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
      333-76820, 333-100637, 333-117125, 333-102592 and 333-110115 on Form S-3,
      Registration Statement Nos. 333-64495, 333-33481, 333-99099 and 333-108419
      on
      Form S-8 of our reports dated March 9, 2006, relating to our audits of the
      consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting,
      which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Altair Nanotechnologies
      Inc.
      and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2005.





/s/
      PERRY-SMITH LLP





Sacramento,
      California


March
      9,
      2006