alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-4.5






 Exhibit 4.5 
  

					
	NUMBER	 		 	SHARES
	*            *	 	                                    
                                	 	*            *

 CIPHER MINING INC. 

INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

THIS CERTIFIES THAT
                                       
      is the owner of
                                      fully paid
and non-assessable shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, of Cipher Mining Inc. (the “Corporation”), transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in
person or by a duly authorized Attorney upon the surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused
this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers this          day of
                            , 20    . 

 
  
 



 
  

			
	
                         
                                         
                          
	  	                           
                                         
                                         
   














 FOR VALUE RECEIVED,
                                         
                                         
   hereby sell, assign and transfer
unto                                        
                                        
                           Shares represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and
appoint
                                         
                                         
                                         
                          Attorney to transfer the said Shares on the books of the within named Corporation with full
power of substitution in the premises. 
 Dated
                                     

In the presence of 
  

			
	
                         
                                         
                                         
                     
	  	
                       
                                         
                                         
                       

	 (print name)
	  	(print name)

 Notice: The signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as written upon the face of the certificate in every
particular, without alteration or enlargement, or any change whatever.
Exhibit 23.1 

**Consent of Independent RegisteredPublic Accounting Firm**

To Intelligroup, Inc. 

     Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements ofIntelligroup, Inc. previously filed on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-31809,333-70244, 333-133751, 333-139639, and 333-11486) of our report dated February 16,2007, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the yearended December 31, 2007. 

/s/ J.H. Cohn LLP 

Roseland, New Jersey 

March 21, 2008 

113

----
# L_2009148EN.01000501.xml

| 11.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 148/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 148/5

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 488/2009

of 10 June 2009

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in particular Article 138(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 11 June 2009.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 June 2009.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.

2

---

ANNEX

Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

| (EUR/100 kg) |
| --- |
| CN code | Third country code (1) | Standard import value |
| 0702 00 00 | MA | 37,3 |
| MK | 39,9 |
| TR | 54,9 |
| ZZ | 44,0 |
| 0707 00 05 | JO | 162,3 |
| MK | 31,4 |
| TR | 131,6 |
| ZZ | 108,4 |
| 0709 90 70 | TR | 111,6 |
| ZZ | 111,6 |
| 0805 50 10 | AR | 55,7 |
| TR | 60,0 |
| ZA | 65,7 |
| ZZ | 60,5 |
| 0808 10 80 | AR | 75,4 |
| BR | 72,8 |
| CA | 69,7 |
| CL | 88,5 |
| CN | 102,4 |
| NA | 101,9 |
| NZ | 105,3 |
| US | 118,5 |
| ZA | 78,1 |
| ZZ | 90,3 |
| 0809 10 00 | TN | 161,5 |
| TR | 197,7 |
| ZZ | 179,6 |
| 0809 20 95 | TR | 510,4 |
| US | 453,6 |
| ZZ | 482,0 |

(EUR/100 kg)

CN code

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

0702 00 00

MA

37,3

MK

39,9

TR

54,9

ZZ

44,0

0707 00 05

JO

162,3

MK

31,4

TR

131,6

ZZ

108,4

0709 90 70

TR

111,6

ZZ

111,6

0805 50 10

AR

55,7

TR

60,0

ZA

65,7

ZZ

60,5

0808 10 80

AR

75,4

BR

72,8

CA

69,7

CL

88,5

CN

102,4

NA

101,9

NZ

105,3

US

118,5

ZA

78,1

ZZ

90,3

0809 10 00

TN

161,5

TR

197,7

ZZ

179,6

0809 20 95

TR

510,4

US

453,6

ZZ

482,0

---

(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
  ZZ
  ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

---
#### Elsworth *et al.*v. Hinton *et al.*

*(Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County.*

October, 1889.)

Discovery—Production of Books and Papers.

On a proceeding to settle a trustee’s accounts, the court, at special term, may order the production of books and papers before the referee, to whom the matter has been referred, so that they may be examined by the *eestuis que trustent.*

Henry Elsworth and another, executors of the will of Edward Elsworth, filed a complaint against Mrs. Sarah Hinton and others, beneficiaries under the will of Edward Elsworth, deceased, for an account of their testator’s transactions as trustee under the will of Henry Elsworth, deceased. The accounting was decreed, and a reference ordered. Defendants move that plaintiffs be required to produce before the referee all books and papers in their possession relating to the trusteeship. For former report, see 4 ÍT. T. Supp. 573.

*William A. Coursen,*for plaintiffs. *Carlisle Norwood, Jr.,*for defendants.

Andrews, J.

There can be no doubt that the court has the power to require plaintiffs to produce their books of account for inspection, upon the accounting which is now pending before the referee. The court of chancery always had such powers, and it is now expressly conferred upon the court, and upon a referee authorized to hear testimony, by section 867 of the Code. The accounting is a part, and a very important part, of the trial, and is had before the referee merely because that method of procedure is more convenient for litigants and the court. Whether the books should actually be deposited and left in the office of the referee, during the pendency of the reference, or for some fixed period, depends upon how many books there are, their size, and whether the referee has a secure and convenient place in which to keep them. I have also no doubt that the court has the power to amend the interlocutory decree by inserting a provision requiring the production of the books before the referee. Motion granted, with $10 costs to abide the event.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001001109
<NAME> HELP AT HOME, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             453
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     5620
<ALLOWANCES>                                       261
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  6792
<PP&E>                                             466
<DEPRECIATION>                                      36
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    9839
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             4184
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            37
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      9839
<SALES>                                           6193
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  6193
<CGS>                                             4232
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     4232
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  2250
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  29
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (318)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (103)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (215)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (215)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
#### SMITH, Respondent, v. McMILLAN, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

January 20, 1896.)

Action by Russell C. Smith against Mary McMillan.

No opinion. ¡Motion denied, with $10 costs and disbursements. See 36 N. Y. Supp. 24.
Exhibit 11











CONSENT OF MERIT INTERNATIONAL CONSULTANTS INC.





Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the Annual Report) of Cumberland Resources Ltd. (the Company), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.



We hereby consent to the references to our name under the heading Narrative Description of Business -- Meadowbank Gold Project, Nunavut Territory, Canada in the Companys Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2005 which is included as part of the Annual Report, and to all other references to our name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report.







Merit International Consultants Inc.



By:

/s/ Jay Collins



Name:

Jay Collins, P.Eng.

Title:

President





March 21, 2006
#### In the Matter of Herald Company, Inc., Respondent, v Board of Parole of the State of New York et al., Appellants.

(Appeal No. 1.)

— Judgment unanimously modified, on the law, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: We agree with Special Term that parole revocation hearings are presumptively open to the public under the doctrine enunciated in *Matter of Herald Co. v Weisenberg*(59 NY2d 378). We find no specific statutory language requiring closure of such hearings. The statutes and regulations referred to by respondents, providing for confidentiality of records, are not unlike the statute applicable in *Weisenberg.*Although the statutes provide for confidentiality of case records, there is no specific mention of closure of hearings, and it would, therefore, be inappropriate to read into these sections a blanket order of closure *(Matter of Herald Co. v Weisenberg, supra,*pp 382-383). In view of this determination, we have no occasion to address petitioner’s claim of a 1st Amendment right of access. Finally, we note that the petition sought relief in the nature of a declaration with respect to respondent’s policies in the future and the judgment grants such relief. Accordingly, we exercise our discretion and convert the matter to a declaratory judgment action (CPLR 103 [b]; *see, e.g., Matter of Allies Blvd. Book Store v Cohen,*90 AD2d 935; *92-07 Rest, v New York State Liq. Auth.,*80 AD2d 603). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Grow, J. — art 78.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Denman and Schnepp, JJ. *[See,*131 Misc 2d 36.]
RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY NEAR BERNARDO, NMLatitude: 34.417Longitude: -106.801Elevation: 4733

RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY NEAR BERNARDO, NM

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Ute Creek Site Page...



Ute Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Vacas Locas Site Page...



Vacas Locas

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Grayback Site Page...



Grayback

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Tres Ritos Site Page...



Tres Ritos

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Taos Powderhorn Site Page...



Taos Powderhorn

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Shuree Site Page...



Shuree

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Palo Site Page...



Palo

Courtesy NRCS - Go to San Antonio Sink Site Page...



San Antonio Sink

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Garita Peak Site Page...



Garita Peak

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Wager Gulch Site Page...



Wager Gulch

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Rio Santa Barbara Site Page...



Rio Santa Barbara

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Taos Pueblo Site Page...



Taos Pueblo

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Los Lunas PMC Site Page...



Los Lunas PMC

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Sevilleta Site Page...



Sevilleta

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Alcalde Site Page...



Alcalde

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Bateman Site Page...



Bateman

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Beartown Site Page...



Beartown

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Chamita Site Page...



Chamita

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Culebra #2 Site Page...



Culebra #2

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Cumbres Trestle Site Page...



Cumbres Trestle

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Gallegos Peak Site Page...



Gallegos Peak

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Hopewell Site Page...



Hopewell

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Lily Pond Site Page...



Lily Pond

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Middle Creek Site Page...



Middle Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to North Costilla Site Page...



North Costilla

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Quemazon Site Page...



Quemazon

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Red River Pass #2 Site Page...



Red River Pass #2

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Senorita Divide #2 Site Page...



Senorita Divide #2

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Trinchera Site Page...



Trinchera

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Upper Rio Grande Site Page...



Upper Rio Grande

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Upper San Juan Site Page...



Upper San Juan

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Whiskey Ck Site Page...



Whiskey Ck

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Wolf Creek Summit Site Page...



Wolf Creek Summit

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Elk Cabin Site Page...



Elk Cabin

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Santa Fe Site Page...



Santa Fe
#### Peter S. Diuccio, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant, v Steven J. Soren et al., Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs-Respondents. Gerardo Scott Diuccio, Additional Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant.

[947 NYS2d 563]

In an action to recover damages for breach of a lease, the plaintiff/counterclaim defendant and the additional counterclaim defendant appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rich*995mond County (Minardo, J.), dated May 13, 2011, which granted the motion of the defendants/counterclaim plaintiffs for leave to enter a default judgment against them upon the failure of the plaintiff/counterclaim defendant to timely interpose a reply to the counterclaims and the additional counterclaim defendant’s failure to appear or answer the counterclaims, and denied their cross motion to vacate the default of the plaintiff/counterclaim defendant in serving a reply to the counterclaims and the additional counterclaim defendant’s default in appearing and serving an answer to the counterclaims and for leave to file and serve a late reply and answer.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

To successfully oppose the motion of the defendants/ counterclaim plaintiffs (hereinafter the defendants) for leave to enter a default judgment and to prevail on their cross motion to vacate the default of the plaintiff/counterclaim defendant (hereinafter the plaintiff) in serving a reply to the counterclaims and the additional counterclaim defendant’s default in appearing or answering the counterclaims, the plaintiff and the additional counterclaim defendant were required to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for their default and a potentially meritorious defense to the counterclaims *(see Adolph H. Schreiber Hebrew Academy of Rockland, Inc. v Needleman,*90 AD3d 791, 792 [2011]; *Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Cervini,*84 AD3d 789 [2011]; *Maurice v Maurice,*78 AD3d 792, 793 [2010]; *MMG Design, Inc. v Melnick,*35 AD3d 823 [2006]). Since the plaintiff and additional counterclaim defendant failed to offer a reasonable excuse for their default and a potentially meritorious defense, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the defendants’ motion for leave to enter a default judgment on the counterclaims and in denying the cross motion of the plaintiff and the additional counterclaim defendant to vacate their respective defaults and for leave to file and serve a late reply and answer. Dillon, J.P., Florio, Lott and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
# L_2010134EN.01007501.xml

| 1.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 134/75 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 134/75

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 26 April 2010

appointing one Austrian member of the European Economic and Social Committee

(2010/305/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 302 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2006/524/EC, Euratom (1),

Having regard to the proposal of the Austrian Government,

Having regard to the opinion of the Commission,

Whereas a member’s seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Heinz PETER,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Alfred GAJDOSIK, Mitglied im Präsidium der Fraktion Christlicher Gewerkschafter im Österreichischen Gewerkschaftsbund, Vorsitzender der Fraktion Christlicher Gewerkschafter in der Gewerkschaft vida und Mitglied im Präsidium der vida (Gruppe III — Vertreter der übrigen wirtschaftlichen und sozialen Interessen) is hereby appointed as a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 20 September 2010.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the day of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 26 April 2010.

For the Council

The President

M. Á. MORATINOS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 207, 28.7.2006, p. 30.

1

---
In th e S up re m e Co urt o f Ge o rg ia

De c id e d: F e b ru ary1 6 , 2 0 1 5 S 1 5 A0 2 5 6 . BATEMAN v . S CROGGINS e t a l. P ER CURIAM. Th e ju d g m e n t o f th e c o urt b e lo w is a ffirm e dwith o u t o pin io n p u rsu an t to S up re m e Co urt Ru le 5 9 . Affirm e d with o u t o p in io n . All th e Ju stic e s c o n c u r.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 00344

- CR

EX PARTE

JAIME ALVAREZ RAMIRE Z

------------

FROM COUNTY CRIMINAL COUR T NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered “ Appellant = s Motion To Withdraw Notice Of Appeal

And To Dismiss Appeal As Being Moot

. ” The motion complies with rule 42.2(a)

of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). No decision of this

court having been delivered before we received this motion, we grant the motion

and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f).

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2 PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App

. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: September 13 , 2012
#### Long Island Lighting Company, Plaintiff, and KeySpan Corporation, Appellant, v Allianz Underwriters Insurance Company et al., Defendants, and Century Indemnity Company et al., Respondents.

Submitted April 23, 2007;

decided May 1, 2007

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution (see *jBurke v Crosson,*85 NY2d 10, 18 n 5 [1995]).
# L_2009123EN.01010001.xml

| 19.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 123/100 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 123/100

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 275/2009 of 2 April 2009 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 872/2004 concerning further restrictive measures in relation to Liberia

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 91 of 3 April 2009
  )

On page 19, Annex, in point 2, under (c):

for:

‘Ali Ramadan Kleilat Al-Delby’,

read:

‘Ali Ramadhan Kleilat Al-Delbi’.

---
#### EX PARTE SHARPE.

(Decided December 11, 1913.)

Original petition in the Supreme Court.

Smiti-i & Wilkinson, for appellant.

Tillman, Bradley & Morrow, for appellee.

Per curiam.

Rule nisi denied.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-10965 

Conference Calendar

 

ALVA L. TURNER, an individual, and 

Successor in Interest and former Executor 

to the Estate of Lillie Mae Crittendon, 

a/k/a Lillie Mae York, 

a/k/a Lillie York Crittendon,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JO DRANE; GERALD G. WOLFSON; HENRY W. BOCKMAN; 

LAWRENCE GALE; GINA CONYERS; SANDRA DAVIS; 

DARREL JOHNSON; BRIAN SMITH; DEBORAH CHILDS; 

DE WITT W. CLINTON; COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; 

BANK OF AMERICA; DOES 1 TO 50,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:96-CV-467-A

- - - - - - - - - -

February 20, 1997

Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Alva L. Turner, individually, and as successor in interest

and former executor of the estate of Lillie Mae Crittendon,

argues that the district court abused its discretion in

dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous based on

its being barred by the statute of limitations.
No. 96-10965

- 2 -

We have reviewed the record, the opinion of the district

court, and the brief, and find that the appeal has no arguable

merit and, accordingly, is DISMISSED as frivolous. See 5th Cir.

Rule 42.2.
CEMENT CREEK AT SILVERTON, COLatitude: 37.82Longitude: -107.664Elevation: 9527

CEMENT CREEK AT SILVERTON, CO

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Idarado Site Page...



Idarado

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Mineral Creek Site Page...



Mineral Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Red Mountain Pass Site Page...



Red Mountain Pass