alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14 AND 15d-14
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, John Robinson, Chief Executive Officer of US Global Nanospace, Inc. (the
"Company"), certify that:

         I have reviewed this amendment to the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A
of US Global Nanospace, Inc.

         Based on my knowledge, this amended quarterly report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report.

         Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in the report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
and for, the periods, presented in the report.

         The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 15(e) and 15d-1415(e)) for the Company and have:

                  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which the periodic report is
being prepared;

                  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

                  (c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the
Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
Company's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over
financial reporting; and

         The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Company's auditors and to the audit committee of the Company's board of
directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent function):

                  (i)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and

                  (ii) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's
internal control over financial reporting.


Dated:  June 1, 2005


/s/ John Robinson
--------------------------------------
John Robinson
Chief Executive Officer
# C_2009197EN.01000101.xml

| 21.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 197/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 197/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5563 — SHV/ERIKS)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 197/01

On 31 July 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5563. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5563. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

LAWRENCE P. CIUFFITELLI, for himself No. 3:16-cv-00580-AC

and as a Trustee of CIUFFITELLI

REVOCABLE TRUST, et al., 

Plaintiffs 

v.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP, et al. ORDER

Defendants 

HERNANDEZ, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Acosta issued a Findings & Recommendation (#481) in which he

recommends the Court grant Plaintiffs' Amended Motion for Preliminary Approval of the Partial

Settlement and Notice. Certain Defendants timely filed objections to the Findings &

Recommendation. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). 

When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings &

Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the

Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th

1 - ORDER
Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).

I have carefully considered Defendants' objections and conclude there is no basis to

modify the Findings & Recommendation. I have also reviewed the pertinent portions of the

record de novo and find no other errors in the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation. 

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings & Recommendation [481], and

therefore, Plaintiffs' Amended Motion for Preliminary Approval of the Partial Settlement and

Notice [350] is granted. It is further Ordered that: (1) the "Class" as defined in Exhibit 1 (ECF

389-1) is provisionally certified; (2) the Order Preliminarily Approving Settlement and Providing

for Notice (ECF 389-2) shall be entered; (3) the Plan of Allocation (ECF 389-3) is approved; (4)

the Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action (ECF 389-4) and the Summary

Notice (ECF 389-5) are approved; (5) the Claims Administrator is approved; (6) the Court

appoints Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP and Stoll Stoll Berne Lokting & Schlacter P.S. as

Class Co-Lead counsel; and (7) the Proposed Schedule of Events set forth in the Amended

Motion is to be followed. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this day of , 2019. 

 

MARCO A. HERNANDEZ

United States District Judge

2 - ORDER
EAST CANYON CREEK NR PARK CITY, UTAHLatitude: 40.724Longitude: -111.52Elevation: 6372

EAST CANYON CREEK NR PARK CITY, UTAH

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Brighton Site Page...



Brighton

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Mill-D North Site Page...



Mill-D North

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Parleys Summit Site Page...



Parleys Summit

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Thaynes Canyon Site Page...



Thaynes Canyon

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Parleys Upper Site Page...



Parleys Upper
# C_2009043EN.01000401.xml

| 21.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 43/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 43/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5313 — Serendipity Investment/Eurosport/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 43/03)

On 16 February 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5313. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5313. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
(December 22, 1986)

#### Allstate Insurance Company, Respondent, v Kenneth Riggio, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

— In an action for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff is not obligated to defend and indemnify the defendant Kenneth Riggio in a negligence action brought against him by a third party, the defendant Kenneth Riggio appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Levitt, J.), dated August 5, 1985, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint as against him, and which declared that the plaintiff Allstate Insurance Company (hereinafter Allstate) does not have duty to defend or indemnify him in the negligence action.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and it is declared that Allstate has a duty to defend, and, if necessary, indemnify the defendant Kenneth Riggio in the aforementioned action.

The plaintiff has failed to establish, as a matter of law, that there is no possible factual or legal basis upon which it might eventually be held to be obligated to defend and indemnify the defendant Riggio *(see, Seaboard Sur. Co. v Gillette Co.,*64 NY2d 304; *Spoor-Lasher Co. v Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.,*39 NY2d 875, 876; *Hanover Ins. Co. v Sage,*123 AD2d 602). The affirmation of the defendant Riggio’s attorney, together with the supporting exhibits submitted therewith, sets forth a claim that the consequences of the defendant Riggio’s actions were unintended. Moreover, the pleading of the plaintiff in the underlying action never averred that the injuries suffered by him were the intended consequences of the defendant Riggio’s actions. Thus, Allstate is obligated to defend and, if necessary, indemnify Riggio in the underlying action brought against him *(see, e.g, Miller v Continental Ins. Co.,*40 NY2d 675; *McGroarty v Great Am. Ins. Co.,*36 NY2d 358; *State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v Shapiro,*118 AD2d 556).

*516We note that the defendant Riggio should be permitted to retain independent defense counsel, at Allstate’s expense, since his interests in proving the unintentional nature of the injuries are in conflict with that of Allstate *(see, Baron v Home Ins. Co.,*112 AD2d 391, 393). Thompson, J. P., Rubin, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Principal Financial

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



I, Peter J. Minihane, Executive Vice President and principal financial officer of Visual
Networks, Inc. (the Registrant), certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 of the Registrant (the Report):



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                     
|/s/ PETER J. MINIHANE                                                                
|                                                                                     
|Name:                    Peter J.
Minihane Date:                      August 14,
2003



50
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ARACELI NAVA A/K/A ARACELI 

MARRUFO-NAVA, 

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-14-00226-CR

Appeal from the

346

th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20140D01257)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s Reply Brief third motion for extension of time 

within which to file the brief until November 6, 2015. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE APPELLANT’S REPLY BRIEF WILL BE 

CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Ruben P. Morales, the Appellant’s Attorney, 

prepare the Appellant’s reply brief and forward the same to this Court on or before November 6, 

2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 8

th day of October, 2015.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
#### BRYER v. FOERSTER.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

December 11, 1896.)

Action by Peter Bryer against Catherine Foerster.

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs. See supra and 41 N. Y. Supp. 617.
#### Pearl Street Neighborhood House, Inc. *v.*Waterbury Zoning Board of Appeals

*James J. Lawlor*and *Michael J. Daly III,*in support of the petition.

*Frederick W. Krug,*in opposition.

Submitted July 16

decided July 23, 1975

The “Petition for Review by Supreme Court” is dismissed.
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o

. 1 0

- 3 0 1 1 3 S u m m a r y C a l e n d a r

K E V I N S T E R L I N G
,

P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l a n t

v

.

C I T Y O F N E W R O A D S ; C O L U M B I A C A S U A L T Y C O M P A N Y
,

D e f e n d a n t s

- A p p e l l e e s

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t F o r T h e M i d d l e D i s t r i c t o f L o u i s i a n a C i v i l A c t i o n N o

. 0 8

- c v

- 4 2 4

B e f o r e R E A V L E Y
, J O L L Y
, a n d O W E N
, C i r c u i t J u d g e s

. P E R C U R I A M : *

T h e j u d g m e n t o f t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t i s a f f i r m e d f o r t h i s r e a s o n :
M r

. S t e r l i n g t o o k l e a v e f r o m h i s e m p l o y m e n t w i t h t h e C i t y o f N e w
R o a d s p u r s u a n t t o t h e F a m i l y M e d i c a l L e a v e A c t

. W h e n h i s l e a v e e x p i r e d
, M r

. S t e r l i n g d i d n o t f u r n i s h h i s e m p l o y e r w i t h c e r t i f i c a t i o n t h a t h e w a s a b l e

t o r e s u m e w o r k

. M r

. S t e r l i n g ’ s f a i l u r e t o p r o v i d e t h e C i t y w i t h c e r t i f i c a t i o n o f

h i s f i t n e s s f o r d u t y b a r s h i s a c t i o n c l a i m i n g e n t i t l e m e n t t o r e i n s t a t e m e n t

u n d e r 2 9 U

. S

. C

. § 2 6 1 4 ( a )

. T h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t c o r r e c t l y r e n d e r e d j u d g m e n t t o U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D June 25 , 20 10
Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Pur sua nt to 5 T H C I R . R. 47 .5, t he c our t h as det er m ine d t hat th is opi nio n sh oul d no t b e pu bli she d * and is not pr ece den t e xce pt unde r t he l imite d ci rc um st anc es set fo rt h i n 5 T H C I R . R. 47 .5.4. Case: 10-30113 Document: 00511154674 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/25/2010No. 10-30113

t h i s e f f e c t

. M r

. S t e r l i n g a d m i t t e d i n h i s d e p o s i t i o n t h a t h e r e c e i v e d n o t i c e a d v i s i n g
h i m o f h i s r i g h t s a n d o b l i g a t i o n s u n d e r C O B R A

. H e d e l i b e r a t e l y e l e c t e d n o t

t o c o n t i n u e C O B R A c o v e r a g e

. N o r e a s o n a b l e j u r y c o u l d c o n c l u d e t h a t M r

. S t e r l i n g r e c e i v e d n o c o m m u n i c a t i o n f r o m t h e C i t y

. T h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t c o r r e c t l y

r e n d e r e d j u d g m e n t t h a t M r

. S t e r l i n g ’ s c l a i m r e g a r d i n g C O B R A i s m e r i t l e s s

. J u d g m e n t A F F I R M E D

. Case: 10-30113 Document: 00511154674 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/25/2010
Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 1513 Filed 10/27/16 Page 1 of 1
F I LED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

March 4, 2009

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff ! Appellant

v.

BRUCE LEE DUNN; HELEN C. DUNN;

OAKLAND HOMES OF UTAH, a

Montana Corporation; DELLA MADSEN;

GAYLE L. HUNTING; DAVID R.

GUNDERSON; JOANNE GRANGER,

Trustee of the Johannah M. Hafen Family

Trust; PAUL A. MANCINA, JR., as

Personal Representative of the Estate of

Frances Mancina, deceased; STEPHEN C.

JACOBSEN; CHARLYNN J.

DALEBOUT; HELEN L. WATTS; JOHN

A. WATTS, also known as John Andrew

Watts; HILDA M. MADSEN; GLADYS P.

BUTLER; LAZY CP "P" LIMITED

PARTNERSHIP; TIMOTHY ALLEN

HURST, Trustee of the Timothy Allen

Hurst Trust; TRUSTEE OF THE

GUNDERSON LEOAN M FAMILY

TRUST; ALICE M. PANNIER; JOHN R.

WOOLSEY; LILLIE E. WOOLSEY;

RICHARD DUNN,

Defendants ! Appellees

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff ! Appellee

v.

No. 07-4197

No. 07-4199

Case: 07-4197 Document: 01017640452 Date Filed: 03/04/2009 Page: 1
2

GAYLE L. HUNTING; DAVID R.

GUNDERSON; PAUL A. MANCINA JR.,

as Personal Representative of the Estate of

Frances Mancina, deceased; STEPHEN C.

JACOBSEN; CHARLYNN J.

DALEBOUT; HELEN L. WATTS; JOHN

A. WATTS, also known as John Andrew

Watts; HILDA M. MADSEN,

Defendants ! Appellants.

JUDGMENT

Before HENRY, Chief Circuit Judge, TACHA and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

This case originated in the District of Utah and was argued by counsel.

The judgment of that court is affirmed in part and reversed in part. The case is

remanded to the United States District Court for the District of Utah for further proceedings

in accordance with the opinion of this court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Case: 07-4197 Document: 01017640452 Date Filed: 03/04/2009 Page: 2
RIO GRANDE AT BRIDGE NEAR ESCONDIDALatitude: 34.121Longitude: -106.887Elevation: 5681

RIO GRANDE AT BRIDGE NEAR ESCONDIDA

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Ute Creek Site Page...



Ute Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Vacas Locas Site Page...



Vacas Locas

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Grayback Site Page...



Grayback

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Tres Ritos Site Page...



Tres Ritos

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Taos Powderhorn Site Page...



Taos Powderhorn

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Shuree Site Page...



Shuree

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Palo Site Page...



Palo

Courtesy NRCS - Go to San Antonio Sink Site Page...



San Antonio Sink

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Garita Peak Site Page...



Garita Peak

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Wager Gulch Site Page...



Wager Gulch

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Rio Santa Barbara Site Page...



Rio Santa Barbara

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Taos Pueblo Site Page...



Taos Pueblo

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Los Lunas PMC Site Page...



Los Lunas PMC

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Sevilleta Site Page...



Sevilleta

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Alcalde Site Page...



Alcalde

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Thoreau Site Page...



Thoreau

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Bateman Site Page...



Bateman

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Beartown Site Page...



Beartown

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Chamita Site Page...



Chamita

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Culebra #2 Site Page...



Culebra #2

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Cumbres Trestle Site Page...



Cumbres Trestle

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Gallegos Peak Site Page...



Gallegos Peak

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Hopewell Site Page...



Hopewell

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Lily Pond Site Page...



Lily Pond

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Middle Creek Site Page...



Middle Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to North Costilla Site Page...



North Costilla

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Quemazon Site Page...



Quemazon

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Red River Pass #2 Site Page...



Red River Pass #2

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Senorita Divide #2 Site Page...



Senorita Divide #2

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Trinchera Site Page...



Trinchera

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Upper Rio Grande Site Page...



Upper Rio Grande

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Upper San Juan Site Page...



Upper San Juan

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Whiskey Ck Site Page...



Whiskey Ck

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Wolf Creek Summit Site Page...



Wolf Creek Summit

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Elk Cabin Site Page...



Elk Cabin

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Santa Fe Site Page...



Santa Fe

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Rice Park Site Page...



Rice Park
# L_2009291EN.01004301.xml

| 7.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 291/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 291/43

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1056/2009 of 5 November 2009 fixing the export refunds on milk and milk products

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 290 of 6 November 2009
  )

On page 67, Annex:

for:

| ‘Product code | Destination | Unit of measurement | Refunds |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 0402 99 10 9350 | L20 | EUR/100 kg | 4,47 ’ |

‘Product code

Destination

Unit of measurement

Refunds

0402 99 10 9350

L20

EUR/100 kg

4,47 ’

read:

| ‘Product code | Destination | Unit of measurement | Refunds |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 0402 99 10 9350 | L20 | EUR/100 kg | 0,00 ’ |

‘Product code

Destination

Unit of measurement

Refunds

0402 99 10 9350

L20

EUR/100 kg

0,00 ’

---
----

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of mPhase Technologies,Inc., a New Jersey corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10K for the fiscal yearended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the"Report"), I, Ronald A. Durando, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify,pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section1350), that to his knowledge: 

1. 

The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and 

2. 

The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. 

/s/ Ronald A. Durando                        Ronald A. Durando Chief Executive Officer 

October 7, 2009 

----
# L_2011241EN.01003503.xml

| 17.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 241/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 241/35

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 664/2009 of 7 July 2009 establishing a procedure for the negotiation and conclusion of agreements between Member States and third countries concerning jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments and decisions in matrimonial matters, matters of parental responsibility and matters relating to maintenance obligations, and the law applicable to matters relating to maintenance obligations

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 200 of 31 July 2009
  )

On page 50, Article 12(2):

for:

‘2.   Where, at the time of entry into force of this Regulation, a Member State has already completed the negotiations but has not yet concluded the agreement, Article 3, Article 8(2) to (4) and Article 9 shall apply.’,

read:

‘2.   Where, at the time of entry into force of this Regulation, a Member State has already completed the negotiations but has not yet concluded the agreement, Article 3, Article 8(2) and (3) and Article 9 shall apply.’.

---