alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Altair Nanotechnologies Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Karen Werner, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (c) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (d) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





By: /s/ Karen WernerKaren Werner
Interim Chief Financial Officer
November 15, 2016
UNCOMPAHGRE RIVER BELOW RIDGEWAY RESERVOIRLatitude: 38.241Longitude: -107.76Elevation: 6659

UNCOMPAHGRE RIVER BELOW RIDGEWAY RESERVOIR

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Idarado Site Page...



Idarado

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Mineral Creek Site Page...



Mineral Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Red Mountain Pass Site Page...



Red Mountain Pass
Exhibit 32.1

Informational Addendum to Report on Form 10-Q

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

Not Filed Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

The undersigned Chief Executive Officer of OYO Geospace Corporation does hereby certify as follows:

Solely for the purpose of meeting the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and solely to the extent this certification may
be applicable to this Report on Form 10-Q, the undersigned hereby certifies that this Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in this
Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OYO Geospace Corporation.



/s/ Gary D. OwensName:

Gary D. OwensTitle:

Chief Executive OfficerMay 8, 2009
**Exhibit 10.1**

**OYO Geospace Corporation**

**FY 2007 Bonus Program**

The FY 2007 bonus program is comprised of three different bonus pools, or “Tiers”. No bonuses are earned until after the company earns a 5% return on itsShareholder Equity, which allows the company to earn a minimum pretax profit of $3.8 million before any bonus accruals begin. 

***Tier 1Program***: The Tier 1 bonus pool is a company-wide “profit sharing.” The Tier 1 program allows every employee in the company (except our Russian employees who are rewarded under a small local plan) to proportionally share in thecompany’s profits based on each employee’s relative payroll. The Tier 1 program focuses each employee toward maximizing the company’s profits, improving the company’s cohesiveness and morale. The Tier 1 bonus pool will beestablished by accruing 30% of consolidated pretax profits (before bonus) exceeding $3.8 million and up to $8.8 million. This bonus pool is capped at $1.5 million. 

***Tier 2 Program***: The Tier 2 program is comprised of approximately 60 employees. This program begins only after the Tier 1 program is fully funded. Therefore, the Tier 2 bonus pool will be built by accruing 30% ofconsolidated pretax profits (before bonus) exceeding $8.8 million and up to $13.0 million, resulting in a bonus pool of $1.3 million. The Tier 2 bonus program covers employees in five different groups: seismic exploration, seismic reservoir,offshore cables, thermal solutions and a general support group. Each group has predefined goals to achieve in FY 2007 in order to earn a bonus in the Tier 2 program. If certain goals are not met, upon approval from the Compensation Committee, theunearned portions will be distributed on a discretionary basis. 

***Tier 3 Program***: There are three senior executive officers in the Tier3 program. This program begins only after the Tier 1 and Tier 2 programs are fully funded. Therefore, the Tier 3 bonus pool will be established by accruing 30% of consolidated pretax profits (before bonus) exceeding $13.0 million and up to $14.6million. If the company achieves pretax profits of up to $14.6 million, a bonus pool of $480,000 will be created with each senior officer earning a bonus of $160,000 if the maximum limit were achieved.
PUEBLO STATE PARK FISH HATCHERY Latitude: 38.268Longitude: -104.724Elevation: None

Pueblo State Park Fish Hatchery

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Glen Cove Site Page...



Glen Cove

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Saint Elmo Site Page...



Saint Elmo

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Hayden Pass Site Page...



Hayden Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Brumley Site Page...



Brumley

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Fremont Pass Site Page...



Fremont Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Independence Pass Site Page...



Independence Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Ivanhoe Site Page...



Ivanhoe

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Porphyry Creek Site Page...



Porphyry Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to South Colony Site Page...



South Colony

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Medano Pass Site Page...



Medano Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Buckskin Joe Site Page...



Buckskin Joe

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Rough And Tumble Site Page...



Rough And Tumble
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

                    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 2, that the Special Medical Advisory Group (the Committee) will meet on September 30, 2021, from 8:00 a.m. EDT to 3:00 p.m. EDT. The meeting is open to the public. The public will only be able to attend virtually. Members of the Committee may join in person or virtually. Join by phone: 1-404-397-1596, Access code 199 871 2999. Join via Webex (please contact POC below for assistance connecting):                     *https://veteransaffairs.webex.com/​veteransaffairs/​j.php?​MTID=​mc8f213c6049548932570e6cb5382d63f.*

The purpose of the Committee is to advise the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and the Under Secretary for Health on the care and treatment of Veterans, and other matters pertinent to the Veterans Health Administration.

On September 30, 2021, the agenda for the meeting will include discussions on electronic health record modernization, health equity and workforce strength and resiliency.

                    Members of the public may submit written statements for review by the Committee to: Department of Veterans Affairs, Special Medical Advisory Group—Office of Under Secretary for Health (10), Veterans Health Administration, 810 Vermont Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20420 or by email at                     *VASMAGDFO@va.gov.*                     Comments will be accepted until close of business on September 28, 2021.                

                    Any member of the public wishing to attend the meeting or seeking additional information should email                     *VASMAGDFO@va.gov*                     or call 202-461-7000.                

Dated: September 1, 2021.

LaTonya L. Small,

Federal Advisory Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2021-19288 Filed 9-7-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Bernard Pitts, Appellant, v Joseph McCoy, as Superintendent of Cayuga Correctional Facility, Respondent.

Submitted April 23, 2007;

decided June 7, 2007

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the Court of Appeals does not have jurisdiction to entertain it.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1712 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1712

    To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to exempt providers of 
   broadband Internet access service from Federal universal service 
                             contributions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 26, 2015

 Mr. Mooney of West Virginia introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to exempt providers of 
   broadband Internet access service from Federal universal service 
                             contributions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Freedom from Internet Tax Act''.

SEC. 2. EXEMPTION OF BROADBAND PROVIDERS FROM FEDERAL UNIVERSAL SERVICE 
              CONTRIBUTIONS.

    Section 254(d) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 254(d)) 
is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Every'' and inserting the following:
            ``(1) In general.--Every''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Exemption for providers of broadband internet access 
        service.--This subsection does not apply to a person engaged in 
        the provision of broadband Internet access service (as defined 
        in the rules adopted in the Report and Order on Remand, 
        Declaratory Ruling, and Order that was adopted by the 
        Commission on February 26, 2015 (FCC 15-24)), insofar as such 
        person is so engaged.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      The  undersigned  hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
Geodyne Energy Income Limited  Partnership II-A ("Issuer") for the period ending
December 31, 2006 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 16th day of April, 2007.

                                GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                PARTNERSHIP II-A
                                ("Issuer")

                                //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                -----------------------------------
                                Dennis R. Neill
                                President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                -----------------------------------
                                Craig D. Loseke
                                Chief Accounting Officer
                                (Chief Financial Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Special Projects Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, October 14, 2021.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Antoinette Ross at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-4110.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Special Projects Committee will be held Thursday, October 14, 2021, at 11:00 a.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be made with Antoinette Ross. For more information please contact Antoinette Ross at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-4110, or write TAP Office, 1111 Constitution Ave. NW, Room 1509, Washington, DC 20224 or contact us at the website: *http://www.improveirs.org.* The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: September 3, 2021.

Kevin Brown,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2021-19500 Filed 9-9-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
PECOS RIVER NEAR PUERTO DE LUNA, NMLatitude: 34.73Longitude: -104.525Elevation: 4320

PECOS RIVER NEAR PUERTO DE LUNA, NM

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Wesner Springs Site Page...



Wesner Springs

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Elk Cabin Site Page...



Elk Cabin

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Santa Fe Site Page...



Santa Fe
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Lance Sessoms, Appellant, v Robert Ercole, Respondent.

Submitted April 9, 2007;

decided June 5, 2007

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
TODD C. SNYDER, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

COMMISSIONER, 

IN THE UNITED ST ATES DISTRICT 

COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

EUGENE DIVISION 

Case No. 6: l 5-cv-02400-SU 

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S 

MOTION FOR ATTORNEY 

FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) 

Social Security Administration, 

Defendant. 

Plaintiff Todd C. Snyder brought this action seeking review of the Commissioner's final 

decision denying his application for Disability lnsnrance Benefits under the Social Secnrity Act. 

The Court reversed the Commissioner's decision, remanded the case for further proceedings, and 

entered Judgment on July 11,2017. 

Plaintiff now seeks an award of fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). I have reviewed the 

record in this case, the motion, and the supporting materials, including the award of benefits, the 

fee agreement with counsel, and the recitation of counsel's honrs and services. Applying the 

standards set by Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 796 (2002), the Conrt finds that the 

requested fees are reasonable. 
Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 406(b) is hereby GRANTED, 

and Plaintiff's counsel is awarded $15,569.70 in attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). 

Previously, the Court awarded Plaintiff attorney fees in the amount of $8,765.10 under the Equal 

Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. When issuing the§ 406(b) check for 

payment to Plaintiff's attorney, the Commissioner is directed to subtract the amounts awarded 

for EAJA and administrative fees and send the balance of $6,804.60, less any applicable 

processing or user fees prescribed by statute, to Plaintiff's attorneys at HARDER, WELLS, 

BARON & MANNING, P.C., 474 Willamette Street, Eugene, Oregon 9740 I. Any amount 

withheld after all administrative and court attorney fees are paid should be released to the 

claimant. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 26th day of March 2019. 

L~0 

Ann Aiken 

United States District Judge 

PAGE 2-ORDER
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 11.1


                           ARBOR SOFTWARE CORPORATION
                STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
                                   (UNAUDITED)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                       THREE MONTHS ENDED          SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                         SEPTEMBER 30,              SEPTEMBER 30,
                                       1996          1995         1996         1995
                                      -------       ------       -------       -----
<S>                                   <C>           <C>          <C>             <C>
Net income ....................       $ 1,417       $  353       $ 2,611         663
                                      =======       ======       =======       =====

Average shares outstanding ....        10,960        2,782        10,929       2,673

Options .......................           755        1,066           780       1,174

Warrants ......................            --           36            --          36

Convertible preferred stock ...            --        5,837            --       5,837
                                      -------       ------       -------       -----

  Total common stock and common
    stock equivalents .........        11,715        9,721        11,709       9,720
                                      =======       ======       =======       =====

Net income per common share ...       $   .12       $  .04       $   .22         .07
                                      =======       ======       =======       =====
</TABLE>




                                       20
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-1892 

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Nebraska.

Hashim Amin Cawthorn, * 

* 

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: February 21, 2008 

 Filed: June 4, 2008

___________

Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, WOLLMAN, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________

BYE, Circuit Judge.

A jury convicted Hashim Cawthorn of conspiracy to distribute and possess with

intent to distribute, and knowingly and intentionally distributing, crack cocaine. He

appealed his convictions and sentence and we affirmed. The Supreme Court granted

certiorari, vacated the judgment, and remanded for our further consideration because

of its decision in Kimbrough v. United States, 552 U.S. —, 128 S.Ct. 558 (2007). We

now affirm Cawthorn's convictions but reverse and remand for resentencing.

At sentencing Cawthorn asked the district court to vary downward from the

advisory guideline range of 210 to 262 months arguing the Guidelines' 100:1 ratio
-2-

between crack and powder cocaine was unreasonable. The district court declined,

stating:

Mr. Cawthorn, your principal objection or your objection principally

goes to a congressional mandate that's been imposed upon the courts and

upon our sentencing regime by making the declaration that crack cocaine

is – has to be treated 100 times worse than powder cocaine. 

That has been a losing fight for 15 years among the judges in this

country. There's no way that – Congress is not inclined to change that.

I have an obligation to – to uphold the law whether I agree with it or not.

That's just one of the oaths that I've taken.

Sent. Tr. at 31.

In Kimbrough, the Supreme Court held sentencing courts may vary downward

from the advisory guidelines range based on the disparity created by the 100:1 ratio

between crack and powder cocaine offenses. 128 S.Ct. At 575-76. We have held

Kimbrough does not require district courts to consider the crack/powder disparity in

all sentences for crimes involving crack cocaine. United States v. Roberson, 517 F.3d

990, 995 (8th Cir. 2008). "[A] district court that is aware of an argument does not

abuse its discretion by not considering it." Id. (citing United States v. Miles, 499 F.3d

906, 909-10 (8th Cir. 2007)). However, "[w]hen a district court does not consider an

argument because it is unaware of its power to do so . . . a remand is appropriate." Id.

Based on this record, it is apparent the district court did not recognize its authority to

vary from the advisory guidelines sentence, and we cannot tell whether, had it know

it could vary, the court would have granted Cawthorn's motion for a downward

variance. See United States v. Thomas, No. 06-2452, 2008 WL 55402, at 4 (N.D.

Iowa. May 5, 2008). Accordingly, we vacate the sentence and remand for

resentencing. As for all other issued raised in Cawthorn's appeal, we affirm for the

reasons stated in our prior opinion. 

______________________________
#### Maria Sonitis, Respondent, v John Sonitis, Appellant.

*662—In a matrimonial action, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Glass, J.), dated June 7, 1985, as directed him to pay to the plaintiff wife the sums of $25 per week in temporary maintenance and $75 per week in temporary child support. The appeal brings up for review so much of an order of the same court, dated August 8, 1985, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination *(see,*CPLR 5517 [b]).

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated June 7, 1985, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order dated August 8, 1985, made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated August 8, 1985 is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent is awarded one bill of costs.

Ordinarily, appeals from orders granting pendente lite relief are not favored inasmuch as it is clearly more expedient and less consuming of both judicial time and that of the attorneys if counsel promptly proceed to trial *(see, Hildenbiddle v Hildenbiddle,*110 AD2d 819, 820; *Epstein v Epstein,*48 AD2d 792; *Singh v Singh,*41 AD2d 914). Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Weinstein, Kunzeman and Spatt, JJ., concur.