alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1952 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1952

To permanently prohibit oil and gas leasing off the coast of the State 
                 of California, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 22, 2015

  Mrs. Capps (for herself, Mr. Farr, Mr. Lowenthal, and Mr. Huffman) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To permanently prohibit oil and gas leasing off the coast of the State 
                 of California, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``California Ocean and Coastal 
Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF OIL AND GAS LEASING IN CERTAIN AREAS OF THE 
              OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF.

    Section 8 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1337) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(q) Prohibition of Oil and Gas Leasing in Certain Areas of the 
Outer Continental Shelf.--
            ``(1) In general.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
        this Act or any other law and except as provided in paragraph 
        (2), beginning on the date of enactment of this subsection, the 
        conduct of oil and gas preleasing, leasing, and related 
        activities is prohibited in areas of the outer Continental 
        Shelf located off the coast of the State of California.
            ``(2) Effect.--Nothing in this subsection affects any 
        rights under leases issued under this Act before the date of 
        enactment of this subsection.''.
                                 <all>
```
WILBORN LAW OFFICE, P.C. 

TIM WILBORN, Attorney at Law - OSB # 944644 

tim@wilbornlaw.com 

P.O. Box 370578 

Las Vegas, NV 89137 

Voice: (702) 240-0184 

Fax: (503) 926-9133 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

SUSAN RISLEY, Case No. 6:16-cv-00466-AC 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

COMMISSIONER of Social Security, 

Defendant. 

1"R'0P@SEIO' ORDER 

Attorney fees in the amount of $5,375.77 are hereby awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to the 

Equal Access To Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). Subject to any offset allowed under the Treasury 

Offset Program, payment of this award shall be made via check sent to Tim Wilborn's address: P.O. 

Box 370578, Las Vegas, NV 89137. In accordance with the fee assigmnent which Plaintiff has 

signed, payment shall be ide in Tim Wilborn's name if no. debt subject to offset exists. 

. ') 11 0·"1 

DATED this:75_ ay of I I I G!f/' .. '.~or; (~-.\ 

Submitted on May 1, 2017 by: 

sf Tim Wilborn 

TIM WILBORN, OSB # 944644 

(702) 240-0184 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

ORDER - Page 1 

/, // (/I I )it (_ .· v·.· ()1. \ ..r/ ···-·· -·- .. =··~ -···~ .. ,(::1.-\ ~· 

United States Disb:iet Cottrt er Magistrate Judge 

d
# L_2013355EN.01009201.xml

| 31.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 355/92 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 355/92

---

Corrigendum to Directive 2009/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009 on the safety of toys

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 170 of 30 June 2009
  )

On page 19:

Article 53(2):

for:

‘..., provided that such toys meet the requirements set out in Part 3 of Annex II to Directive 88/378/EEC and ...’,

read:

‘..., provided that such toys meet the requirements set out in Section 3 of Part II of Annex II to Directive 88/378/EEC and ...’;

Article 55, first paragraph:

for:

‘Directive 88/378/EEC, except Article 2(1) and Part 3 of Annex II, is repealed with effect from 20 July 2011. Article 2(1) thereof and Part 3 of Annex II thereto are repealed with effect from 20 July 2013.’,

read:

‘Directive 88/378/EEC, except Article 2(1) and Section 3 of Part II of Annex II, is repealed with effect from 20 July 2011. Article 2(1) thereof and Section 3 of Part II of Annex II thereto are repealed with effect from 20 July 2013.’.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1992 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1992

   To reduce temporarily the royalty required to be paid for sodium 
           produced on Federal lands, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 23, 2015

 Mr. Cook (for himself, Mrs. Lummis, Mr. Himes, Mr. Brooks of Alabama, 
   Ms. Bonamici, Mr. Valadao, Mr. Schrader, and Mrs. Mimi Walters of 
 California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To reduce temporarily the royalty required to be paid for sodium 
           produced on Federal lands, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``American Soda Ash Competitiveness 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION IN ROYALTY RATE ON SODA ASH.

    Notwithstanding section 102(a)(9) of the Federal Land Policy and 
Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701(a)(9)), section 24 of the 
Mineral Leasing Act (30 U.S.C. 262), and the terms of any lease under 
that Act, the royalty rate on the quantity or gross value of the output 
of sodium compounds and related products at the point of shipment to 
market from Federal land in the 5-year period beginning on the date of 
enactment of this Act shall be 2 percent.
                                 <all>
```
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-10053 Conference Calendar

__________________ PEDRO GOMEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus DON WILEY, Patrolman, Cisco TX Police Department, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:94-CV-144-C

- - - - - - - - - - June 29, 1995
Before JONES, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * On October 6, 1994, Pedro Gomez, a prisoner of the State of Texas, filed a civil rights action against Patrolman Don Wiley of the Cisco Police Department, alleging various constitutional violations. He appeals the judgment of the district court dismissing the action as barred by the statute of limitations. He argues that his claim is not time-barred because 1) he was denied medical care for approximately six months, and he was notNo. 95-10053 -2-
aware of the extent of his injury until his injury was diagnosed on October 8, 1992; 2) the cause of action accrued on May 2, 1994, when he became aware through the help of a legal assistant, Mario Martinez, that he had been deprived of his constitutional rights; and 3) he tried to file the complaint on May 11, 1994, when Martinez requested envelopes and postage to mail his complaint. On its face, the action is barred by the applicable statute of limitations. See Gartrell v. Gaylor , 981 F.2d 254, 256 (5th Cir. 1993). Gomez's arrest occurred on May 11, 1992, and he filed his complaint on October 6, 1994. Gomez's contention that he did not know the extent of his injury until he was diagnosed by Dr. Victor E. Hudman, after a fall in October 1992, is unconvincing. In his brief, he states that he had been suffering the specific medical symptoms addressed by Dr. Hudman since his arrest. Equally unavailing is Gomez's argument that he was not aware that the officer had violated his constitutional rights until he received advice from a legal assistant. The cause of action accrued when Gomez knew or had reason to know of his injury, not when he knew of the legal theory. In his final argument, Gomez asserts that his complaint was not mailed because prison personnel confiscated Martinez's typewriter on May 12, 1994, and ignored Martinez's requests for writ envelopes and postage. He concedes that his complaint was time-barred because Martinez told him that the time for filing his complaint was about to expire on May 11, 1994, and he did notNo. 95-10053 -3-
file his complaint by that date. To the extent that Gomez attempts to argue that he was deprived of his right of access to the courts or that prison authorities interfered with his mail, we do not address the issue because it was not raised in the district court. See Varnado v. Lynaugh , 920 F.2d 320, 321 (5th Cir. 1991).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CARMEN E. CAMPBELL,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

JULES M. PERLEY,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 11-56558

D.C. No. 2:09-cv-09182-RGKMAN

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

R. Gary Klausner, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 26, 2012** 

Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

Carmen E. Campbell appeals pro se from the district court’s order

dismissing her medical malpractice action for failure to prosecute. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion,

FILED

JUL 13 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-56558

Al-Torki v. Kaempen, 78 F.3d 1381, 1384 (9th Cir. 1996), and we affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Campbell’s

action because it had been pending for more than a year and Campbell failed to file

an adequate response to the court’s order to show cause why it should not be

dismissed for lack of prosecution. See id. at 1384-85 (discussing factors to guide

the court’s decision and affirming dismissal for failure to prosecute).

Campbell’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.
KELO - LOST RIVER AT KELLER BRIDGELatitude: 42.165Longitude: -121.319Elevation: None

KELO - Lost River at Keller Bridge

Courtesy NRCS - Go to State Line Site Page...



State Line

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Strawberry Site Page...



Strawberry

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Gerber Reservoir Site Page...



Gerber Reservoir

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Crowder Flat Site Page...



Crowder Flat
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00630-CR

Scott Anthony Gunn, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LAMPASAS COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 8161, HONORABLE JOE CARROLL, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant’s brief on appeal was originally due January 5, 2009. On counsel’s motion,

the time for filing was extended to February 13, 2009. No brief has been filed on appellant’s

behalf and no further extension of time for filing has been sought. Appellant’s appointed attorney,

Scott K. Stevens, did not respond to this Court’s notice that the brief is overdue.

The appeal is abated. The trial court shall conduct a hearing to determine whether

appellant desires to prosecute this appeal and, if so, whether counsel has abandoned the appeal.

Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2). The court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations.

If necessary, the courtshall appointsubstitute counsel who will effectively represent appellant in this

cause. A record from this hearing, including copies of all findings and orders and a transcription of

the court reporter’s notes, shall be forwarded to the Clerk of this Court for filing as a supplemental

record no later than June 5, 2009. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(3).
2

___________________________________________

Diane M. Henson, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Puryear and Henson

Abated

Filed: May 8, 2009

Do Not Publish
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         202,859
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  255,759
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,086,239
<PP&E>                                         67,900
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6,391,355
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,786,521
<BONDS>                                        1,331,292
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,273,542
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6,391,355
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               410,386
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               289,540
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                120,846
<INCOME-TAX>                                   59,181
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            61,665
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   61,665
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
YAMPA RIVER - MAYBELL PLUS LILYLatitude: 40.542Longitude: -108.454Elevation: 6274

YAMPA RIVER - MAYBELL PLUS LILY

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Sage Creek Basin Site Page...



Sage Creek Basin

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Little Snake River Site Page...



Little Snake River

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Elkhead Divide Site Page...



Elkhead Divide

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Battle Mountain Site Page...



Battle Mountain

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Divide Peak Site Page...



Divide Peak

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Elk River Site Page...



Elk River

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Old Battle Site Page...



Old Battle

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Sandstone RS Site Page...



Sandstone RS

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Webber Springs Site Page...



Webber Springs

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Whiskey Park Site Page...



Whiskey Park
Exhibit 32.1

Informational Addendum to Report on Form 10-Q

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

Not Filed Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

The undersigned Chief Executive Officer of OYO Geospace Corporation does hereby certify as follows:

Solely for the purpose of meeting the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and solely to the extent this certification may
be applicable to this Report on Form 10-Q, the undersigned hereby certify that this Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in this
Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OYO Geospace Corporation.



/s/ Gary D. OwensName:    Gary D. OwensTitle:      Chief Executive OfficerAugust 1, 2006
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.5
Meredith Corporation 
1716 Locust Street
Des Moines, IA 50309 
T 515-284-3000


Jason Frierott


Subject: Amendment to Employment Agreement 


Dear Jason,


Our records indicate you are party to an Employment Agreement (“Agreement”) with Meredith Corporation (“Meredith”). Upon your acceptance below, this letter shall serve as an Amendment to the Agreement.


Due to the unprecedented and negative effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, Meredith is implementing a reduction in pay program. The program reduces employee base salary by a set percentage within certain tiers. Accordingly, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in your Employment Agreement, you hereby acknowledge and agree that:


(i)    beginning May 4, 2020 (“Effective Date”), through September 4, 2020, your annual Base Salary (as defined in the Agreement) shall be reduced to $472,500 (before withholdings and deductions), (herein, “new Base Salary”), and will continue to be paid on a bi-weekly basis with the new Base Salary first reflected in your May 15, 2020 paycheck; and


(ii)    to the extent your new Base Salary is used to calculate any benefits paid through short term disability or any 401k benefits under the applicable Meredith plan, your new Base Salary as of the Effective Date may impact any such benefits to which you may be entitled under the terms of the applicable plan, but shall not otherwise modify or impact the benefits or payments to which you are entitled under any other benefit or compensation plan or agreement or the calculation of benefits or payments thereunder.


You further agree that this reduction in Base Salary, even if it reduces your Base Salary below any stated minimum in your Agreement, shall not constitute a breach of the Agreement and shall not allow you to resign your employment and receive separation pay under the Agreement or any severance plan.


This Amendment and the Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Iowa without reference to the principles of conflict of laws. Except with respect to the changes expressly noted herein, the Agreement otherwise remains in full force and effect.


We do understand this is going to be tough for all of us, but we need everyone to continue to pull together so that we can emerge from this challenge even stronger. If you have questions, please contact your local HR representative.


Please electronically sign this letter by May 13, 2020.




MEREDITH CORPORATION


/s/ Dina Nathanson
SVP, Human Resources


I agree to the above Amendment and I understand that, except as amended above, the terms and conditions of my employment will continue to be governed by the aforesaid Agreement.






Signature: /s/ Jason Frierott                Date of Signature: 5/12/2020


- 1 -
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 23

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-47355 and 333-93401 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-10149,
333-10153, 333-10157, 333-11037, 333-13187, 333-56607, 333-67619, 333-71113,
333-80775, 333-33696, 333-40530, 333-46512 and 333-46514 on Form S-8 of The
Dial Corporation of our report dated January 22, 2001, appearing in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K of The Dial Corporation for the year ended December 31,
2000.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Phoenix, Arizona

March 6, 2001
#### Johnnies Pelham Road Service, Inc., Respondent, v Richard S. Thomas, Appellant.

Submitted April 30, 2007;

decided June 12, 2007

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A)
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR FISCAL QUARTERS MARCH 31, 1998 AND 1997 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) 10-QSB/A.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         164,172
<SECURITIES>                                   200,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,730
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               209,138
<PP&E>                                         682,151
<DEPRECIATION>                                  59,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,994,827
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,083,477
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    217,795
<COMMON>                                       142,453
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,315,485
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,994,827
<SALES>                                        137,735
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               137,735
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  359,907
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               112,743
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              72,743
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (334,915)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (334,915)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (334,915)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)
        

</TABLE>
Variability of Lake Powell Apr - J

Based on February 2002 Mid-M

ont

0

2000400060008000

1000012000

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Exce

e

d

a

nce Frequency

Apr - Jul Runoff in TAF
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Altair Nanotechnologies Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Edward Dickinson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
      Edward Dickinson


Edward
      Dickinson


Chief
      Financial Officer


March
      16,
      2006
TWG Chair & Vice Chair Election

•THANK YOU Seth and Michelle.

•TWG Chair Position Description (op procedures)

•Nominations

 Open call for nominations

 Confirmation of willingness to serve from nominees 

•Motion to Appoint by consensus

 Example: “The TWG elects _____ to the position of Chair and ______ to 

the position of Vice Chair to the Glen Canyon Dam Technical Work 

Group for the Fiscal Year 2024.

 Discussion?

 Are there any objections?