alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Pest Management Research: Sidney, MT
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    NPARL
                        Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory
                                    Agricultural Systems Research Unit
                                    Grasshoppers: Their Biology, Identification and ManagementSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Sidney, Montana Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory Pest Management Research PMRU Docs Grasshoppers: Their Biology, Identification and Management: Outbreak and Survey Info





- NPARL Home
- PMRU Home
- ASRU Home
- Site Highlights
- Outbreak and Survey Info
- ID Tools | Apps
- Grasshopper Management
- IPM Handbook
- USDA Research | Contact Info

Outbreak Info: 2019 Adult Grasshopper Surveyheadline bar /ARSUserFiles/30320505/grasshopper/Extras/images/Maps/2019 Adult GH Survey.jpg Return to Outbreak Info


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
EXHIBIT 32.1


                   Certification of Periodic Financial Report

                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2003, the  undersigned  officer of Obsidian  Enterprises,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  certifies  that the  annual  report  on Form 10-K of the
Company for the fiscal year ended  October 31,  2003,  fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
and the information contained in that Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 Date: February 12, 2004            /s/ Timothy S. Durham
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Timothy S. Durham
                                    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
PECOS RIVER ABOVE CANON DEL UTA NEAR COLONIASLatitude: 35.091Longitude: -104.801Elevation: 4828

PECOS RIVER ABOVE CANON DEL UTA NEAR COLONIAS

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Wesner Springs Site Page...



Wesner Springs

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Elk Cabin Site Page...



Elk Cabin

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Santa Fe Site Page...



Santa Fe
JOSEPH FARLEY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-3491

_____________________________/

Opinion filed April 4, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Russell L. Healey, Judge.

Flem K. Whited, III, and Kayla R. Hathaway, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Robert Quentin Humphrey, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Farley appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction 

relief filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm in all 
2

respects except for the summary denial of Ground Six. We reverse and remand for 

further proceedings on that ground for the reasons that follow.

Farley pled guilty to two counts of DUI manslaughter and his judgment and 

sentence were affirmed on direct appeal in Farley v. State, 151 So. 3d 1234 (Fla. 1st 

DCA 2014) (unpublished table opinion). In May 2016, Farley filed a timely rule 

3.850 motion containing 16 “grounds” for relief, all of which alleged claims of 

ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The postconviction court summarily denied 

the motion, finding all of the claims to be legally insufficient and/or refuted by the 

record. This timely appeal followed.

In Ground Six of the motion, Farley alleged that his trial counsel’s 

performance was deficient because he told Farley that all of the discovery materials 

pertaining to his blood draw had been received and contained nothing beneficial to 

the defense when, in fact, several discovery requests were still awaiting a response. 

Farley further alleged that but for this deficient performance he would not have 

entered a negotiated plea and instead would have insisted on going to trial.

This claim is facially sufficient, see Mason v. State, 742 So. 2d 370 (Fla. 1st 

DCA 1999), and as the State concedes, it is not refuted by the record excerpts 

attached to the postconviction court’s order. The motion for discovery attached to 

the order refutes any suggestion that trial counsel failed to pursue discovery 

pertaining to Farley’s blood draw, but it does not refute the claim alleged in Ground 
3

Six that counsel’s misrepresentation that all of the discovery responses had been 

received and were not beneficial to the defense induced Farley to enter a plea.

Accordingly, we reverse the summary denial of Ground Six and remand for

the postconviction court to either attach portions of the record refuting the claim of 

ineffective assistance of counsel alleged in that ground or to hold an evidentiary 

hearing on that ground. In all other respects we affirm the postconviction court’s 

order.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED with directions.

WETHERELL, MAKAR, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
#### WARD v. BURGHER.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

September 14, 1896.)

Summary proceedings by J. Q. A. Ward against Homer Burgher.

No opinion. Motion for a reargument, or for leave to go to the court of appeals, denied. See 35 N. Y. Supp. 961.
Exhibit
14.(a).1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference  in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-149175) of Blue Square-Israel Ltd. (hereafter –
“the Company”), of our report dated June 25, 2009, relating to the financial
statements of the Company and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, which appears in this Annual Report.




/s/ Kesselman &
      KesselmanHaifa,
      Israel
                  Kesselman
      & KessellmanJune
      25, 2009
                  Certified
      Public Accountants
(Isr.)
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Purchase Point Media Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven A. Kempenich, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Steven A. KempenichSteven A. KempenichChief Executive Officer


May 14, 2008
**Exhibit      32.1 -**
**Certification      of Principal Executive Officer**

**CERTIFICATION      IN ACCORDANCE WITH**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED BY**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                William E. Ladin, Jr.     |
|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|   | William                E. (Billy) Ladin, Jr. |
|   | Chief                Executive Officer       |
|   | Date:                November 09, 2006       |
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 10.34

                                    AMENDMENT

This document, dated January 16, 1998, amends the Employment Agreement, dated
September 19, 1997 between Xenometrix, Inc. and Mark B. Benjamin. Section 6(d)
of the Employment Agreement is hereby cancelled and replaced with the following
Section 6(d):

      (d) If the Employee's employment shall be terminated by the Corporation
          pursuant to Section 5(d) or (f) hereof, then the corporation shall
          continue to pay the Employee his regular salary through the date which
          is six months after the Date of Termination; if the Employee's
          employment shall be terminated by the Corporation pursuant to Section
          5(e) hereof or as a result of a change of control of the corporation
          or of its Board of Directors, then the corporation shall continue to
          pay the Employee his regular salary through the date which is twelve
          months after the Date of Termination; provided, however, that in any
          case, the Corporation's obligation to pay such salary shall terminate
          at such time as the Employee commences any alternative full-time
          employment. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Corporation will be
          obligated to reimburse the Employee for reimbursable expenses (to the
          extent provided in Section 3(c) hereof) accrued through the Date of
          Termination. The Employee shall also be entitled to receive a payment
          for (i) any accrued but unused vacation days and (ii) a pro rata
          portion of any cash bonus due pursuant to Section 3(b) hereof. If the
          Employee's employment shall be terminated by the Corporation pursuant
          to Section 5(d), (e) or (f) hereof, and if the Employee shall be
          ineligible to participate in any of the Corporation's fringe benefit
          plans or arrangements as a result of his ceasing to be an employee of
          the Corporation, then the Corporation shall arrange to provide the
          Employee with substantially equivalent benefits as if he remained
          employed by the Corporation until the earlier of (i) six months, if
          terminated under Section 5(d) or (f), or twelve months, if terminated
          under Section 5(e) at no additional expense to the Employee.

XENOMETRIX, INC.                        MARK B. BENJAMIN


By:
     -------------------------------    ------------------------------
Its:
     -------------------------------
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Asta Funding, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Gary Stern, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company
         as of the dates presented and the consolidated results of operations of
         the Company for the periods presented.

Dated: August 9, 2006


                                                     /s/ Gary Stern
                                                     -------------------
                                                     Gary Stern
                                                     Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Asta Funding, Inc. and will be retained by Asta Funding, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       31
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                        Consent of Independent Auditors
                                        
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-59679) pertaining to the 1996 Equity Participation Plan of Rental
Service Corporation, which incorporates by reference the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-22403); the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-29579)
pertaining to the First Amended and Restated Employee Qualified Stock Purchase
Plan of Rental Service Corporation; and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-18637) pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plan for Key Employees of Acme
Acquisition Holdings Corp. of our report dated February 10, 1999 with respect to
the consolidated financial statements of Rental Service Corporation included in
the Annual Report and Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998.


                                         /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Phoenix, Arizona
March 1, 1999

                                       1
Draft outline 

2003 State of the Colorado River Ecosystem Report 

I. Executive Summary 

II. Law, Policy and Administration 

 ‘Law of the River’ & History of the GCD project 

 1956 CRSPA 

 1968 CRBPA 

 Coordinated Long-Range Operating Criteria 

 1992 GCPA 

 1996 GCD EIS & ROD 

 GCDAMP 

 AMWG 

 TWG 

 GCMRC 

 IRP 

 Other Federal Compliance Laws and Responsibilities 

 ESA 

 1994 Biological opinion 

Section 7 consultations 

NHPA 

 Trust responsibilities 

III. Above Glen Canyon Dam (including Lake Powell, water releases and power) 

 Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology 

 Past Lake Powell inflows 

 Future projected Lake Powell inflows 

 Lake Powell Limnology 

 Reservoir Characteristics 

 Thermal Characteristics 

 Water Quality 

 GCD Operations 

 Past Releases 

 Projected Future Releases 

Power 

 Hydropower Production 

 Impacts to Western 

 CRSPA Repayment schedule 

 Wholesale rate 

Retail rate 

Impacts to non-profit power distributors 

IV. Aquatic Ecosystems Resources 

 Physical Habitats 

 Downstream release characteristics of water 
 Tailwater program 

Thermal program 

 Water Chemistry (Multi parameter continuous samplers) 

 Unregulated tributary inflows 

Sediment Resources 

 Fine-sediment overview 

 Sand mass balance 

Sandbar monitoring 

 Bed-grain size data 

 Main channel 

 Eddies 

 Coarse sediment tributary inputs 

 Debris Fans and Rapids 

Channel Mapping 

 Food Base 

Vegetation 

 Invertebrates 

 Trophic linkages 

 Fish 

Native Fish 

 Humpback Chub 

 Flannelmouth Sucker 

 Razorback Sucker 

 Bluehead Sucker 

 Speckled Dace 

 Non-native Cold-water species 

 Rainbow Trout 

 Lee’s Ferry 

 Downstream 

 Brown Trout 

 Non-native Warm water species 

 Cultural 

 Historic properties (i.e. Spencer’s steamboat) 

 TCPs 

 Other cultural resources of traditional concern 

 Recreation 

 Lee’s Ferry Trout Fishing 

 Creel data 

 Day rafting 

 White water boating 

 Safety 

 Recreation Economics 

V. Terrestrial Ecosystem Resources 

Physical Habitats 

Higher elevations sediment 
Coarse sediment tributary inputs 

 Debris Fans 

 Springs 

 Associated vegetation and fauna 

Food Base 

Riparian Nutrient Dynamics 

Invertebrates 

Vegetation 

 Hydro-riparian (Marsh) zones 

 Lower riparian zone 

 Upper riparian zone 

 Wildlife 

 Endangered and other Special Status Species 

 Bald Eagle 

Peregrine falcon 

 KAS 

 SWWFC 

 Non-endangered Arizona State Species of Concern 

 Niobrara Ambersnail 

 Northern Leopard Frog 

 Belted Kingfisher 

 Osprey 

Cultural resources 

 Archeological Sites 

 Traditional Cultural Properties 

 Other Cultural Resources of Traditional Concern 

 Ethnobotanical resources 

 Recreational resources 

 Beaches 

VI. Information Technology (provided as a source for future inquiries) 

Data base management system 

 Remote Sensing and Survey 

 GIS 

GCMRC library 

VII. Appendices 

 Glossary of terms 

 Operating Criteria for GCD in accordance with the 1992 GCPA 

 Charter of the GCD AMWG, 

Vision and Mission Statement, 

 Principles and Goals
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1855 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1855

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow deductions and 
  credits relating to expenditures in connection with marijuana sales 
                conducted in compliance with State law.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 16, 2015

Mr. Blumenauer (for himself, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mr. Smith of Washington, 
Mr. Hanna, Mr. Polis, and Mr. Young of Alaska) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow deductions and 
  credits relating to expenditures in connection with marijuana sales 
                conducted in compliance with State law.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Tax Equity Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. ALLOWANCE OF DEDUCTIONS AND CREDITS RELATING TO EXPENDITURES IN 
              CONNECTION WITH MARIJUANA SALES CONDUCTED IN COMPLIANCE 
              WITH STATE LAW.

    (a) In General.--Section 280E of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by inserting before the period at the end the following: ``, 
unless such trade or business consists of marijuana sales conducted in 
compliance with State law''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
with respect to taxable years ending after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Benjamin Staton, Appellant.

At trial, the defendant did not specify why the charge as to alibi as given was inadequate; therefore the claimed error was not preserved for our review as a matter of law *(see, People v Hoke,*62 NY2d 1022, 1023). In any event, a review of the alibi charge convinces us that it did, indeed, unequivocally convey the People’s burden to disprove an alibi beyond a reasonable doubt *(see, People v Victor,*62 NY2d 374). The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit *(People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620, 621; *People v Arce,*42 NY2d 179, 187). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Niehoff and Weinstein, JJ., concur.