alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009143EN.01001001.xml

| 24.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/10

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5534 — Access/PCH/LBI)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 143/04

On 12 June 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5534. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5534. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration

# AGENCY:

United States Section, NAFTA Secretariat, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice of NAFTA Panel Decision in the matter of Ammonium Sulphate from the United States of America. (Secretariat File Number: MEX-USA-2015-1904-01).

# SUMMARY:

On July 7, 2021, a NAFTA Binational Panel issued its Decision in the matter of Ammonium Sulphate from the United States of America (Determination on Remand). The Binational Panel remanded the Secretaria de Economia's (Economia) second Determination on Remand and ordered Economia to issue a redetermination within 90 days.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Vidya Desai, Acting United States Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat, Room 2061, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230, (202) 482-5438.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Article 1904 of Chapter 19 of NAFTA provides a dispute settlement mechanism involving trade remedy determinations issued by the Government of the United States, the Government of Canada, and the Government of Mexico. Following a Request for Panel Review, a Binational Panel is composed to provide judicial review of the trade remedy determination being challenged and then issue a binding Panel Decision. The NAFTA Binational Panel Decision is available publicly at                     *https://can-mex-usa-sec.org/​secretariat/​report-rapport-reporte.aspx?​lang=​eng.*                     The NAFTA Panel Decision is being announced pursuant to Rule 70 of the                     *NAFTA Rules of Procedure for Article 1904 Binational Panel Reviews.*                     For the complete Rules, please see                     *https://can-mex-usa-sec.org/​secretariat/​agreement-accord-acuerdo/​nafta-alena-tlcan/​rules-regles-reglas/​article-article-articulo_​1904.aspx?​lang=​eng.*

Dated: August 27, 2021.

Vidya Desai,

Acting U.S. Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat. 

[FR Doc. 2021-18895 Filed 8-31-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-GT-P
#### Ryder *v.*Bushwick R. Co.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.*

July 18, 1890.)

Running op Statute op Limitations.

The statute run's against an action for the specific performance of a certificate entitling the holder to shares of the capital stock of a company on surrender of the certificate at the company’s office, from the time the company delivers the certificate.

Appeal from special term, Kings county.

Action by Smith Byder against the Bushwick Bailroad Company for the specific' performance of certificates dated March, 1868, entitling the holder to 30 shares of the capital stock of defendant company on surrender of the certificates at the company’s office. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

Argued before Barnard, P. J.. and Dykman and Pratt, JJ.

*Charles S. Simpkins,*for appellant. *Edwin W. Ivins, (Thomas S. Moore,*of counsel,) for respondent.

Pratt, J.

The action is equitable. No demand was necessary before bringing suit. The present action could have been brought at once, on the delivery of the certificates. This action was barred by the statute in 10 years from the delivery of the certificates. The statute of limitations is therefore a good defense. Irrespective of that statute, we are of-opinion that the origin of the certificates, and the consideration paid therefor, are not shown with sufficient clearness to justify the court in adjudging a specific performance. That relief is, to a certain extent, in the discretion of the court; and, where serious doubt surrounds a transaction, courts of equity often decline to aid a plaintiff, leaving him to his,remedy at law. A remedy at law existed in the present case, as an action for damages might have been sustained for a refusal to issue stock. "We think the meagerness of the proof of the origin and consideration of the certificates would justify the refusal to decree specific performance. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.
Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program

Technical Work Group Meeting

November 7-8, 2002

List of Attachments

No. Subject Author /

Presenter

1 Attendance Sheets

2a

2b

2c

2d

Memo from TWG Chair to TWG Members, dtd 10/8/02

Results of Paired Comparisons Exercise by TWG on 5/16/02

Comments on Information Needs Document

AMP TWG Meeting, Nov. 7, 2002, INs to be Sequenced

Mary Orton

3a

3b

Non-Native Fish Control PowerPoint Presentation

New Fishing Regulations

Bill Persons

4a

4b

4c

FY-2004 GCMRC Research & Monitoring Work Plan Budget – AMP

Funding: 11/07/2002 and

FY-2004 GCMRC Research & Monitoring Work Plan Budget with

Experimental Flows Adjustment: 11/07/2002

FY-2003 GCMRC Research & Monitoring Work Plan Budget –

AMP Funding: 11/07/2002

FY-2003 GCMRC Research & Monitoring Work Plan Budget with

Experimental Flows Adjustment: 11/07/2002

Experimental Flows Budget Summary (without Sediment inputs):

11/07/2002

Experimental Flows Budget Summary (with Sediment inputs):

11/07/2002

GCMRC Contributions (FY-2003): 11/07/2002

GCMRC Contributions (FY-2004): 11/07/2002

Steve Gloss

5a

5b

Warm Water Science Plan PP presentation

Biological Aspects of the Warm Water Science Plan PowerPoint

presentation

Steve Gloss

6a

6b

Youth Monitoring Trip-Pictures

Written Report

Brenda Drye

7 Hualapai Tribe – Evaluating Hualapai Cultural Resources Along

Colorado River, 2001, Final Report and part of 2002 Draft Report

Loretta Jackson

8 NPS Archaeological Monitoring for FY 2002 Lisa Leap

9 Basin Hydrology Chris Cutler

10 Beneficial Use of Removal of Non-Native Fish Steve Gloss

11 Salmonid Assessment Trip Report Steve Gloss

12 Trout Sampling and Estimates Bill Persons

13 Sediment Update Ted Melis

MISC Building Trust – When Knowledge From “Here” Meets Knowledge

From “Away”
ROCK CREEK NEAR MOUNTAIN HOME, UTLatitude: 40.493Longitude: -110.578Elevation: 7252

ROCK CREEK NEAR MOUNTAIN HOME, UT

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Brown Duck Site Page...



Brown Duck

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Lakefork Basin Site Page...



Lakefork Basin

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Rock Creek Site Page...



Rock Creek
Exhibit 14.(a).1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-149175) of Alon Holdings Blue Square – Israel Ltd. (the "Company”), of our report dated June 30, 2011, relating to the financial statements of the Company and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 20-F/A.





Haifa, Israel
/s/ Kesselman & KesselmanJuly 6, 2011
Kesselman & KesselmanCertified Public Accountants (Isr.)A member of PricewaterhouseCoopersInternational Limited
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2022 KW 0324

VERSUS

ANDRE GRIFFIN AND TREVEON MARCH 30, 2022

ROBINSON

In Re: Andre Griffin and Treveon Robinson, applying for

supervisory writs, 18th Judicial District Court, 

Parish of Pointe Coupee, No. 83, 365- F c/ w 83, 666- F. 

BEFORE: McCLENDON, WELCH, AND THERIOT, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. STAY LIFTED. The stay previously issued by

this court in this matter is hereby lifted. 

JEW

MRT

McClendon, J., dissents. I would grant a thirty -day

continuance. 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

dFAiUtY CLERK OF COUR

FOR THE COURT
EXHIBIT 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of IDX Systems Corporation (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, James H. Crook, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and John A. Kane, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|                    |  |  |  | 
|------------------- |  |  |  | 
|                   
|Dated: May 15, 2003 |  |  |  | 
|                    |  |  |  | 





|                    |  |  |  | 
|------------------- |  |  |  | 
|                   
|Dated: May 15, 2003 |  |  |  | 
|                    |  |  |  | 





























A signed original of this written statement has been provided to IDX Systems Corporation and will be retained by IDX Systems Corporation and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Goal 11: Riparian Vegetation 

Draft Metrics

Technical Work Group Meeting

13 April 2022

Emily Palmquist

U.S. Geological Survey, Southwest Biological Science Center, Grand 

Canyon Monitoring and Research Center, Flagstaff, AZ, USA
Goal 11: Maintain native 

vegetation and wildlife habitat, 

in various stages of maturity, 

such that they are diverse, 

healthy, productive, selfsustaining, and ecologically 

appropriate.
Goal 11: Maintain native 

vegetation and wildlife habitat, 

in various stages of maturity, 

such that they are diverse, 

healthy, productive, selfsustaining, and ecologically 

appropriate.
Measuring plants

• What species are present

• Composition

• How much of each species is there

• Abundance/cover
Draft Metrics

• Total plant cover

• Native plant richness

• Native to nonnative plant ratio
Total plant cover

• Percent observed areal cover of vascular plant species

• Related to maintaining self-sustaining, productive native 

vegetation and wildlife habitat

Durning, L.E., Sankey, J.B., Yackulic, C.B., Grams, P.E., Butterfield, B.J., and Sankey, T.T., 

2021, Hydrologic and geomorphic effects on riparian plant species occurrence and 

encroachment—Remote sensing of 360 km of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon: 

Ecohydrology, no. e2344, online, https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2344.

Palmquist, E.C., Butterfield, B.J., and Ralston, B.E., in press, Five-year status 

and trends of riparian vegetation in Glen and Grand Canyons downstream 

of Glen Canyon Dam: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report.
Native plant richness

• Number of native vascular plant species per unit area

• Related to maintaining a diverse riparian vegetation community

Palmquist, E.C., Butterfield, B.J., and Ralston, B.E., in press, Five-year status 

and trends of riparian vegetation in Glen and Grand Canyons downstream 

of Glen Canyon Dam: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report.
Native to nonnative 

plant ratio

• Percent areal cover of native plant species 

divided by percent areal cover of nonnative 

plant species

• Related to maintaining native vegetation and 

sustaining an ecologically appropriate 

vegetation community

Hydrologic 

zone 1

Hydrologic 

Zone 2

Hydrologic 

Zone 3

Debris 

Fan 3.0 2.8 3.9

Gravelbar 4.1 6.9 5.1

Sandbar 3.9 2.1 1.8 Palmquist, E.C., Butterfield, B.J., and Ralston, B.E., in press, Five-year status 

and trends of riparian vegetation in Glen and Grand Canyons downstream 

These data are preliminary and are subject to revision. Do not cite. of Glen Canyon Dam: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report.
.. t- .,... • 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

JERRY DON McFARLAND, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

EUGENE POLICE DEPARTMENT, 

Defendant 

COFFIN, Magistrate Judge: 

Civil No. 6:15-cv-158-TC 

FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION 

Pro se plaintiff filed his most recent amended complaint in this 

action asserting civil rights violations against the Eugene Police 

Department. 

This court has dismissed several previous amended complaints and 

advised plaintiff of the deficiencies in his complaints with an 

opportunity to amend. The latest opportunity provided an extensive 

analysis of what the deficiencies were, see #20, and allowed plaintiff 

Case 6:15-cv-00158-TC Document 26 Filed 07/01/16 Page 1 of 2
.. ·p -

one last time to amend with a warning that a failure to amend would 

result in the dismissal of this action with prejudice. Plaintiff has 

not amended or made any other filing. As such, this action should be 

dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a court 

order. The five factors for dismissal discussed in Malone v. United 

States Postal Service, 833 F.2d 128 (9th Cir. 1987) have been weighed 

and indicate that dismissal is proper. 

DATED this I r1 :::J~ (1 

day of ~ 2016. 

2 - FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

Case 6:15-cv-00158-TC Document 26 Filed 07/01/16 Page 2 of 2
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-30252

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FRED JOINER, III

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:06-CR-338-1

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Fred Joiner, III, has moved for leave

to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967). Joiner has not filed a response. Our independent review of the

record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 16, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
#### Varsted C. JIZMEJIAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 84-523.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Nov. 26, 1984.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM COMPANY'S
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF INCOME TAXES AND IS 
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001001185
<NAME>                        IDX SYSTEMS CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                           <C>               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1998      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-01-1998      JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                       MAR-31-1998      MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                              1                1    
<CASH>                                  10,647           11,493      
<SECURITIES>                           104,721          102,542
<RECEIVABLES>                           72,376           55,244       
<ALLOWANCES>                            (1,298)            (949)
<INVENTORY>                                  0                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       200,294          180,532      
<PP&E>                                  57,998           47,543                                       
<DEPRECIATION>                          28,026           23,733
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         242,586          215,719 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   46,861           45,492
<BONDS>                                      0            2,600   
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0                0
<PREFERRED>                                  0                0
<COMMON>                                   263              221
<OTHER-SE>                             186,803          163,465
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           242,586          215,719
<SALES>                                 17,581           21,887
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        72,737           59,559
<CGS>                                   37,248           29,964
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           27,269           23,499
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             0            4,512
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            31              165
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          43               20
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          9,342            7,291
<INCOME-TAX>                             4,940            2,794
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      4,402            4,497
<DISCONTINUED>                               0                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0                0
<CHANGES>                                    0                0
<NET-INCOME>                             4,402            4,497
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             0.17             0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0.16             0.17
        

 

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>              1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               1,366
<SECURITIES>                                         1,096
<RECEIVABLES>                                        7,533
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    10,172
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      12,873
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                7,677
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                86
<OTHER-SE>                                           4,210
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        12,873
<SALES>                                              9,517
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     9,517
<CGS>                                                7,722
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        1,770
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         45
<INCOME-TAX>                                             5
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     39
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                            39
<EPS-BASIC>                                            .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .01



</TABLE>
II 

Calendar No. 392 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2080 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 15, 2016 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 

AN ACT 

To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of 

construction of a hydroelectric project involving Clark 

Canyon Dam. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR A FEDERAL ENERGY 

4 REGULATORY COMMISSION PROJECT IN5 VOLVING CLARK CANYON DAM. 

6 Notwithstanding the time period described in section 

7 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would 

8 otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Com9 mission project numbered 12429, the Federal Energy 

10 Regulatory Commission (referred to in this section as the 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2080 PCS

1 ‘‘Commission’’) shall, at the request of the licensee for the 

2 project, and after reasonable notice and in accordance 

3 with the procedures of the Commission under that section, 

4 reinstate the license and extend the time period during 

5 which the licensee is required to commence construction 

6 of project works for the 3-year period beginning on the 

7 date of enactment of this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 14, 

2016. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS

srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 392 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2080 

AN ACT 

To reinstate and extend the deadline for commenceinvolving Clark Canyon Dam. ment of construction of a hydroelectric project 

MARCH 15, 2016 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS