alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                            6127
<SECURITIES>                                      8704
<RECEIVABLES>                                    10032
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                       3414
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 29066
<PP&E>                                            2885
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   32749
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             8358
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         26321
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1930)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     32749
<SALES>                                          10758
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 10758
<CGS>                                             2861
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     6880
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (178)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   3
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1192
<INCOME-TAX>                                       180
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               1012
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1012
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14
        

</TABLE>
NO. 03-14-00722-CR

MARK FRUGE * IN THE COURT OF APPEALS Appellant * VS. * OF THE THIRD * SUPREME JUDICIAL * DISTRICT OF TEXAS THE STATE OF TEXAS * Appellee * AT AUSTIN TEXAS
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

APPELLATE BRIEF TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE COURT OF APPEALS: COMES NOW, Appellant, and files this Motion for an Extension in which to file the Appellant’s Brief. In support of this motion, appellant shows the Court the following: I
. The Appellant was convicted in the District Court of Travis County, Texas of the offense of aggravated assault. Appellant was assessed life in TDCJ. II. The deadline for filing the Appellant’s Brief is June 22, 2015 and Appellant has requested two previous extensions. III. Attorney for the Appellant would further show the Court that he has been ACCEPTED 03-14-00722-CR 5851114 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/26/2015 8:51:12 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERKd i l i genti n p r e p a r in g A p p el l ee ’s b ri ef i n thi s c a se. D ue t o a veryb usyd oc k etc ounsel i s una b l e t o c omp l et e the b ri ef w i thi n the t i me f

rame. C ounsel re q uest s a n ext ensi on of t i me so tha the maya d eq ua t el yp re p a r e A p p el l a nt ’s B ri ef
. C ounsel i s c omp l et i ng
a n o th erb rie f

in th is C o u rt a t th is tim e a n d is a l m o s t f in is h ed re a d in g th e re c o rd in th is
c a s e . W H E R E F O R E , A p p el l a ntp ray s the C ourtgrant thi s M ot i on a nd ext end the d e a d l in e f

o rf ilin g th e A p p e l l a n t’ s B r ie f to J u l y 2 7 , 2 0 1 5
. Re s pe ct fu l l yS u bm i t t e d, AR I E L PA YA N A t t o rn e yatL aw 1012 Ri o G r an de A u s t i n , Te x as 78701 ( 512) 478- 3900 (5 1 2 ) 4 7 2 -4 1 0 2 (f

a x) A ri elp a y a n@ hot ma i l
. c om / s/ A r iel P a y a n AR I E L PA YA N S t at e BarN o . 00794430
CERT I F I CATE OF S ERVI CE
B ymysignatur e ab ove, I her eb yc ert i f ytha ta true a nd c orr ect c op yof the ab ove a nd f ore goi ng M ot i on f

or E xt ensi on of T i me t o F i l e A p p el l a t e B ri ef ha s b ee n d el i ver ed to th e C r im in a l D is tr ic t A tt o rn e y o f s a id C o u n ty T e x a s , o n J u n e 2 6 , 2 0 1 5
.
Exhibit 99.1

                                 Certifications

            Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002


I, Gary Stern, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Asta Funding, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
         material information relating to the registrant, including its
         consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
         entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
         is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
         and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
         this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
         evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

         a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
         controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
         identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
         internal controls; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
         internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: February 10, 2003


/s/ Gary Stern
------------------------------
Gary Stern
President and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             4,816
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             3,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  19,200
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                       0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       17,132
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                            35,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                              34,763
<LOANS>                                           71,557
<ALLOWANCE>                                          879
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   153,677
<DEPOSITS>                                       126,460
<SHORT-TERM>                                           0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                4,810
<LONG-TERM>                                        1,816
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                             145
<OTHER-SE>                                        20,445
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                   153,677
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    5,736
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  2,927
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     502
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                   9,166
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 5,181
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 5,325
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              3,840
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        230
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                     0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    3,724
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      274
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           274
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                         211
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                      3.02
<LOANS-NON>                                          716
<LOANS-PAST>                                          66
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                       0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      782
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     678
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                         28
<RECOVERIES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    879
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 456
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              423
        


</TABLE>
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21A1609. DEREK LEE THOMAS v. BARNES LAND AND INVESTMENTS,

LLC et al.

On October 9, 2020, the trial court issued an order granting summary judgment

to the defendants on the basis that all of the claims of the plaintiff, Derek Lee

Thomas, were barred by resjudicata and collateral estoppel. Thomasfiled this appeal

on March 7, 2021. The defendants have filed a motion to dismiss, asserting that the

appeal is untimely.

A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the trial court

judgment or order sought to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and timely

filing of a notice of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction on this

Court. Rowland v. State, 264 Ga. 872, 872 (1) (452 SE2d 756) (1995). Here, Thomas

filed his appeal 149 days after the trial court entered its order. Therefore, the appeal

is untimely. Accordingly, the motion to dismissis herebyGRANTED, and this appeal

is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

July 08, 2021

07/08/2021
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

§

EX PARTE No. 08-18-00146-CR

§

TYRONE CAMERON. Appeal from the

§

County Criminal Court No. 1

§

of El Paso County, Texas

§

(TC# 20170C10013)

§

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Tyrone Cameron is appealing an order denying pre-trial habeas corpus relief. In his habeas 

application, Appellant challenged the constitutionality of the information charging him with 

harassment. The State subsequently dismissed the criminal prosecution against Appellant thereby 

rendering this appeal moot. It is well established that an appellate court does not have jurisdiction 

to decide moot controversies and render advisory opinions. See TEX.CONST. art. II, § 1; National 

Collegiate Athletic Association v. Jones, 1 S.W.3d 83, 86 (Tex. 1999). If events occurring during 

the pendency of the appeal cause the matter before the court to become moot, the appellate court 

is prohibited from deciding it. See Heckman v. Williamson County, 369 S.W.3d 137, 162 (Tex.

2012). When the premise of a habeas corpus application is destroyed by subsequent developments, 

the legal issues raised thereunder are moot. See Ex parte Guerrero, 99 S.W.3d 852, 853 
2

(Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, no pet.)(mem. op.). Accordingly, we grant Appellant’s 

motion and dismiss the appeal as moot.

January 11, 2019 YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-21017 Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CHRISTOPHER C. MOUTOH,
Defendant-Appellant.

______________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Texas

(CR-H-95-8-7)

______________________________________________ July 3, 1996

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *
Christopher C. Moutoh appeals his sentence for conspiracy to

defraud the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 286. He

argues that the district court clearly erred in declining to award

a two-level reduction for accep tance of responsibility under

U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1. Moutoh's plea agreement contains a provision2

waiving his right to appeal, "except the right to appeal an illegal

sentence." That language does not unambiguously preclude our

consideration of Moutoh's argument. S ee United States v. Baty , 980
F.2d 977, 979 (5th Cir. 1992), cert. denied , 508 U.S. 956, 113 S.

Ct. 2457, 124 L. Ed.2d 672 (1993).

Moutoh's argument that his guilty plea and cooperation are

conclusive of acceptance of respons ibility ignores many of the

other provisions in the plea agreement, and is without merit.
Because Moutoh neither truthfully admitted the conduct comprising

the offense nor "came clean" regarding the full extent of his

criminal conduct, the district court did not clearly err by denying
the downward adjustment. See United States v. Diaz , 39 F.3d 568,
572 (5th Cir. 1994).

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 11               

                         THE MAJESTIC STAR CASINO, LLC
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                            (dollars in thousands)

                                      Year Ended December 31,
                                 1998          1997          1996
                                 ----          ----          ----
Available earnings:
  Net income (loss)            $(4,473)     $(13,887)      $(8,887)
  Add interest expense          15,850        12,877         8,598
                                ------        ------         -----
Available earnings (loss)      $11,377       $(1,010)        $(289)

Fixed Charges:
  Interest expense             $15,850       $12,877        $8,598
  Capitalized interest               0         2,317           213
                                ------        ------         -----
Total Fixed Charges            $15,850       $15,194        $8,811
_____
NOTES:
(1)  The ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the years ended December 31,
1998, 1997, and 1996 was less than one to one.  The approximate dollar
amount necessary to cover the deficiency in these periods were: 1998 --
$4,473, 1997 -- $16,204 and 1996 -- $9,099.
#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Ave Reservoir Elevation                    
csv

      Pool Elevation                    
csv

      Storage                    
csv

#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Ave Reservoir Elevation                    
json

      Pool Elevation                    
json

      Storage                    
json
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2127

VALERIE DONNELLY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

C. MCFERRIN SMITH, III,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Anderson. Bruce H. Hendricks, District 

Judge. (8:15-cv-00737-BHH)

Submitted: November 19, 2015 Decided: November 23, 2015

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Valerie Donnelly, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Valerie Donnelly appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

dismissing her civil complaint without prejudice pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Donnelly v. Smith, No. 

8:15-cv-00737-BHH (D.S.C. Aug. 26, 2015). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# L_2009138EN.01000101.xml

| 4.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 138/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 138/1

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 456/2009

of 3 June 2009

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in particular Article 138(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 4 June 2009.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 June 2009.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.

2

---

ANNEX

Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

| (EUR/100 kg) |
| --- |
| CN code | Third country code (1) | Standard import value |
| 0702 00 00 | IL | 69,6 |
| MA | 125,3 |
| TR | 57,2 |
| ZZ | 84,0 |
| 0707 00 05 | MK | 27,4 |
| TR | 134,5 |
| ZZ | 81,0 |
| 0709 90 70 | TR | 117,0 |
| ZZ | 117,0 |
| 0805 50 10 | AR | 51,1 |
| TR | 57,8 |
| ZA | 57,9 |
| ZZ | 55,6 |
| 0808 10 80 | AR | 80,0 |
| BR | 72,8 |
| CL | 71,8 |
| CN | 90,3 |
| NZ | 105,8 |
| US | 119,3 |
| UY | 71,7 |
| ZA | 82,2 |
| ZZ | 86,7 |
| 0809 10 00 | TR | 227,5 |
| ZZ | 227,5 |

(EUR/100 kg)

CN code

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

0702 00 00

IL

69,6

MA

125,3

TR

57,2

ZZ

84,0

0707 00 05

MK

27,4

TR

134,5

ZZ

81,0

0709 90 70

TR

117,0

ZZ

117,0

0805 50 10

AR

51,1

TR

57,8

ZA

57,9

ZZ

55,6

0808 10 80

AR

80,0

BR

72,8

CL

71,8

CN

90,3

NZ

105,8

US

119,3

UY

71,7

ZA

82,2

ZZ

86,7

0809 10 00

TR

227,5

ZZ

227,5

---

(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
  ZZ
  ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

---
Exhibit 10.9.1



AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE

VISUAL NETWORKS, INC.

2003 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN



W  I  T  N  E  S  S  E  T  H:



WHEREAS, Section 7(f) of the Visual Networks, Inc. 2003 Stock
Incentive Plan (the Plan) authorizes the Board of Directors (the Board) of Visual Networks, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Corporation), to amend the Plan at any time; and



WHEREAS, the Board now finds it desirable and in the best interests of
the Corporation to amend the Plan to increase the number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued under the Plan by 3,000,000 shares, for an aggregate of 4,250,000 shares.



NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended, effective as of April 21, 2004, subject to stockholder approval, as follows:



First and Only Change



The first sentence of Section 4 of the Plan is amended in its entirety to
read as follows:



Subject to adjustments
as provided in Section 7(d) of the Plan, the shares of Common Stock that may be issued with respect to Awards granted under the Plan shall not exceed an aggregate of 4,250,000 shares of Common Stock.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Amendment No. 1 to
be executed by its duly authorized officer this 21st day of April, 2004.



|        |  |                       |  |                       |  |     |  |                       
|------- |  | --------------------- |  | --------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------
|ATTEST: |  |                       |  | VISUAL NETWORKS, INC.
|        |  |                       |  |                      
|By:     |  | /s/ Nancy A. Spangler |  |                       |  | By: |  | /s/ Lawrence S. Barker
|        |  |                       |  |                       |  |     |  |