T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

* * T he H on orabl e C on suel o B . M ar shal l , S eni or U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ct J udge f orthe C e ntr a l D i s tr i c tof C a l i f orni a , s i tt i ng by de s i gna t i on. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. L UC I O J OA QU I N C AMAR I L L O, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 10- 30097 D . C . N o. 2: 09 -c r- 02 02 3-E F S -1

ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe E a s t e rn D i s tr i c tof W a s hi ngt on E dw a r d F . S he a , D i s tr i c tC ourtJ udge , P r e s i di ng A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d J a nua ry 14, 2011

S e a tt l e , W a s hi ngt on B ef ore: G R A B E R and F IS H E R , C i rc ui tJudg es , and M A R S H A L L , S eni or D i stri ct Judg e. ** D ef endantL uci o Joaqu i n C am ar i l l o t i m el y app ea l s the di stri ctcourt ’ s deni al of hi s m ot i ons t o s uppr e s s a nd hi s m ot i on f orahe a r i ng pur s ua ntt o Franks v . D ela w a re , 43 8 U . S . 15 4 (19 78 ). D ef endantar gu es thatthe se ar ch w arrantw as



# FI LED MA R 16 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

pr e m i s e d on a n i l l e ga l w i r e t ap a nd tha tthe a f f i da vi ts upport i ng the s e a r c h w a rr a nt o m itte d m a te r ia l in f

o rm a tio n . W e r e v ie w ad is tr ic t c o u rt’s d e n ia l o f am o tio n to su p p ress de no vo . U n ite d S ta te s v . M a d d o x , 6 1 4 F .3 d 1 0 4 6 , 1 0 4 8 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 0 ) . W e r e vi e w a n i s s ui ng j udge ’ s de c i s i on tha taw i r e t ap w a s ne c e s s a ry f orabus e of d is c r e tio n . U n ite d S ta te s v . C a n a le s G o m e z , 3 5 8 F .3 d 1 2 2 1 , 1 2 2 5 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 a n d a f f irm . T h e w ir e tap w a rr a n t c o n ta in e d s u f f ic ie n t in f o rm a tio n f

o rth e is s u in g ju d g e to de t e rm i ne tha tthe w i r e t ap w a s ne c e s s a ry . S e e U ni t e d S t a t e s v. M c G ui r e , 307 F . 3d 1 1 9 2 , 1 1 9 6 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 2 ) (“ T h i s ‘ n ecessi ty’ req u i rem en tcan b e sat i sfi ed b y a s h o w in g in th e ap p lic a tio n th a t o r d in a ry in v e s tig a tiv e p r o c e d u r e s , e m p lo y e d in go od fa i th, w ou l d l i kel y be i neff ec t i ve i n the part i cul arca se . ” ( ci t i ng U ni t ed S t at es v. B r one , 792 F . 2d 1504, 1506 ( 9th C i r . 1986) ) ) . T he a f f i da vi ts upport i ng the w ir e tap w a rr a n t d e ta ile d u n iq u e d if f ic u ltie s in th e in v e s tig a tio n o f th e C a m a r illo fa m i l y, i ncl ud i ng C am ar i l l o fam i l y m em bers ’ pastre fusa l s t o coo pera t e w i th l aw e n f o r c e m e n t, d if

f ic u lty lo c a tin g f

a m ily m e m b e r s ’ r e s id e n c e s , a n d s p e c if ic p r o b le m s w ith c o n d u c tin g p h y s ic a l a n d e le c tr o n ic s u rv e illa n c e . D e f e nda nti de nt i f

i e s thr e e f

a c t s tha tw e r e pr e s e nti n the a f f i da vi ts upport i ng the w i re t ap bu tom i tt ed fr om the af fi davi tsupp ort i ng the se ar ch w arrant : (1) that m e m be r s of

the C a m a r i l l o f

a m i l y t e nde d nott o s t or e na r c ot i c s a tthe i rhom e s ; ( 2)3

thatph ys i ca l survei l l ance of the C am ar i l l o fam i l y m em bers ’ ho m es di d n otre veal s us pi c i ous a c t i vi ty ; a nd ( 3) tha tm e m be r s of the C a m a r i l l o f

a m i l y w e r e not b e lie v e d to k e e p w r itte n d o c u m e n ta tio n o f th e ird ru g tr a f

f ic k in g . W e h a v e h e ld thatan om i ss i on m ayprov i de the basi s f or a Franks he a r i ng w he n: “ ( 1) the a f f i da vi tc ont a i ns i nt e nt i ona l l y orr e c kl e s s l y f a l s e s t a t e m e nt s orm i s l e a di ng om i s s i ons , a nd ( 2) the a f f i da vi tc a nnots upportaf i ndi ng of pr obabl e c aus e w i thout the al l egedl y f

al se i nform at i on . ” U

ni ted Stat es v. R ee ves , 2 1 0 F .3 d 1 0 4 1 , 1 0 4 4 ( 9 th C i r . 2000) . T he a f

f i da vi ts upport i ng the s e a r c h w a rr a ntdi d notc ont a i n a ny m islead in g o m issio n s. A cc o rd in g ly, th e d istrict co u rt p ro p er ly d en ied D ef en d an t’ s m ot i on t o sup pres s and D ef endant ’ s r equestfor a Franks h e a r in g . AF F I R ME D.