alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 12.2


I, David Zigdon, certify that:

 1. I have reviewed this amendment to annual report on Form 20-F of Radcom Ltd.;
    and

 2. Based on my knowledge, this amendment to report does not contain any untrue
    statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
    make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
    statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
    this annual report.

Date: May 13, 2004

/s/ David Zigdon

David Zigdon
 Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-46874, 333-86785and 333-59582) of Liquid Audio, Inc. (currently known as LQ Corporation, Inc.) of our report dated March 5, 2004 with respect to the financial statements and schedule of the Company included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year endedDecember 31, 2003. 

 

Rothstein Kass &Company, PC 

 

Roseland, New Jersey 

March 30, 2004
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Livestock and Range Research Laboratory: Miles City, MT
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Public Notice
                        Recent Notices
                                    2024 School Tours
                    2024 Research Animal Sale On-line AuctionSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Miles City, Montana Livestock and Range Research Laboratory Docs





- Range & Nutrition Research
- Field Day Publications
- Publications by Discipline

Nutritionheadline bar   Range Animal NutritionMANAGEMENT STRATEGIES FOR EFFICIENCY PRODUCTION OF BEEF CATTLEON NORTHERN GREAT PLAINS RANGELANDNutrition HistoryObjectivesApproachNutrition Personnel**See the Nutrition Publications at the following:**  Abstracts    Journal Articles or contactDr. Elaine Gringsor Dr. Richard Waterman for more information. USDA, ARS Fort Keogh Livestock and Range Research Laboratory,243 Fort Keogh Rd., Miles City, MT  59301-4016Phone: 406-874-8200, Fax:  406-874-8289


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Cumberland Resources Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.  The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.  The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.





Date:  June 28, 2005





/s/  Kerry M. Curtis



Kerry M. Curtis

President and Chief Executive Officer









A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Cumberland Resources Ltd. and will be retained by Cumberland Resources Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
ARKANSAS RIVER AT CANON CITYLatitude: 38.434Longitude: -105.257Elevation: 5342.10

ARKANSAS RIVER AT CANON CITY

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Glen Cove Site Page...



Glen Cove

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Saint Elmo Site Page...



Saint Elmo

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Hayden Pass Site Page...



Hayden Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Brumley Site Page...



Brumley

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Fremont Pass Site Page...



Fremont Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Independence Pass Site Page...



Independence Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Ivanhoe Site Page...



Ivanhoe

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Porphyry Creek Site Page...



Porphyry Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to South Colony Site Page...



South Colony

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Medano Pass Site Page...



Medano Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Buckskin Joe Site Page...



Buckskin Joe

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Rough And Tumble Site Page...



Rough And Tumble
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Marilyn Kelly

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices

Michael F. Cavanagh

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

July 19, 2006 

s0712 

Order 

 

July 19, 2006 

129710-12 

DAVID W. OIMAS, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 129710-129712 

 COA: 247762, 248409, 255789 

Oakland CC: 2000-024757-NZ 

TRADEWINDS AVIATION, INC., 2003-047674-NZ 

Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

RICHARD M. NINI, 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 19, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

CAVANAGH, WEAVER, and KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          753518
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  6883224
<ALLOWANCES>                                    665000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               8467262
<PP&E>                                          199803
<DEPRECIATION>                                   24476
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 8892039
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6710752
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         37388
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   8892039
<SALES>                                        6659133
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6659133
<CGS>                                          4554330
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1966929
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 137874
<INCOME-TAX>                                     37239
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             100635
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    100635
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Casanova, Also Known as Louis Gonzalez, Appellant.

The defendant was arrested when he was found hiding in the basement of an abandoned warehouse after being chased to that location by neighbors of the complaining witness. Based on the totality of information known to the arresting officer we have concluded that there was probable cause to arrest him *(see, People v Bigelow,*66 NY2d 417).

That branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony was also properly denied. The accidental viewing of the defendant’s photograph by the complaining witness was not the product of any suggestive or improper police conduct. In any event, since the complaining witness had an ample opportunity to view the defendant at close quarters for a five-minute period during the crime, there is no danger of a mistaken identification» and suppression is not required *(see, People v Logan,*25 NY2d 184, *cert denied*396 US 1020; *People v Bookhart,*117 AD2d 739; *People v Crutchfield,*111 AD2d 346).

The comments made by the Trial Judge to the defense counsel did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial since the *814Judge did not interfere with the presentation of the defendant’s case and the remarks did not show any bias against the defendant or otherwise indicate that the Judge had any opinion as to the merits of the case *(see, People v Moulton,*43 NY2d 944; *People v De Jesus,*42 NY2d 519).

The defendant’s guilt was proven beyond a reasonable doubt *(see, People v Foster,*64 NY2d 1144, *cert denied*— US —, 106 S Ct 166). Further, we see no reason to modify the sentence imposed by the trial court.

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions, including those made in his *pro se*supplemental brief, and have concluded that they are either unpreserved or without merit. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Lawrence and Fiber, JJ., concur.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The Honorable Michael M. Anello, District Judge for the U.S. District

Court for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FRANCIE E. MOELLER; EDWARD

MUEGGE; KATHERINE CORBETT;

CRAIG THOMAS YATES,

 Plaintiffs - Appellants,

 v.

TACO BELL CORP.,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 12-17144

D.C. No. 4:02-cv-05849-PJH

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Phyllis J. Hamilton, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted June 13, 2013

San Francisco, California

Before: O’SCANNLAIN and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges, and ANELLO, District

Judge.** 

FILED

JUN 24 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
Plaintiffs-Appellants (Plaintiffs) attempt to appeal two orders of the district

court. One order amended the findings of facts and conclusions of law the court

had issued after the first phase of a bifurcated trial regarding an exemplar Taco

Bell restaurant. The second modified the court’s case management plan. Both

stated that the district court would defer any decision concerning whether it would

grant any form of injunctive relief. Plaintiffs assert that we have jurisdiction to

review the referenced orders pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), which gives us

jurisdiction to review “orders of the district courts of the United States . . .

granting, continuing, modifying, refusing or dissolving injunctions.” We disagree,

and dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

The district court’s decision to defer judgment on the merits of a permanent

injunction is not an express refusal to enter an injunction. See Paige v. California,

102 F.3d 1035, 1038 (9th Cir. 1996) (explaining that orders that fall “squarely

within the scope of § 1292(a)(1)” are appealable as a matter of right). Nor have

plaintiffs satisfied the Supreme Court’s “practical effect” test by demonstrating that

the orders have “serious, perhaps irreparable consequences that petitioners can

effectually challenge only by an immediate appeal.” Carson v. Am. Brands, Inc.,

450 U.S. 79, 90 (1981) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Oregon

Natural Res. Council, Inc. v. Kantor, 99 F.3d 334, 337 (9th Cir. 1996). In the ten

year span of this litigation, plaintiffs have never sought any form of preliminary
injunctive relief. Therefore, in this case, as was true in the Supreme Court’s

decision in Switzerland Cheese Association, Inc. v. E. Horne’s Market, Inc., 385

U.S. 23 (1966), “not only [is] the [district] court free to grant the requested

injunctive relief in full after conducting [full proceedings] on the merits, but it [is]

also not precluded from granting a motion for preliminary injunction during the

pendency of the litigation if petitioners were to allege that further delay would

cause them irreparable harm.” Carson, 450 U.S. at 85 n.10 (describing the Court’s

reasoning in Switzerland Cheese).

DISMISSED.
**Exhibit 13.(a).1**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report ofAlon Holdings Blue Square - Israel Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2011,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifythat to the best of our knowledge:

 

 

 

 

 

By: /s/ David Wiessman

      David Wiessman

      Executive Chairman of theBoard of Directors and Chief Operating Decision Maker

 

                                                                                                                           

By: /s/ Zeev Vurembrand
window.PlotlyConfig = {MathJaxConfig: 'local'};
POWER OF ATTORNEY


     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned,  being a
director  or  officer,  or both, of BLOWOUT ENTERTAINMENT, INC., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), does hereby constitute and appoint STEVE BERNS
and KARL D. WETZEL, with  full  power  to each of them to act alone, as the
true and lawful attorneys and agents of the undersigned, with full power of
substitution and resubstitution to each  of said attorneys to execute, file
or deliver any and all instruments and to do all acts and things which said
attorneys and agents, or any of them, deem  advisable to enable the Company
to comply with the Securities Exchange Act of  1934,  as  amended,  and any
requirements  or  regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission  in
respect thereof, in  connection  with  the  Company's  filing  of an annual
report  on  Form  10-K  for  the  Company's  fiscal  year  1996,  including
specifically,  but  without  limitation  of  the  general  authority hereby
granted, the power and authority to sign his name as a director or officer,
or both, of the Company, as indicated below opposite his signature,  to the
Form  10-K,  and  any  amendment  thereto; and each of the undersigned does
hereby fully ratify and confirm all  that said attorneys and agents, or any
of them, or the substitute of any of them,  shall do or cause to be done by
virtue hereof.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this Power of
Attorney as of this 28th day of February, 1997.



/S/ STEVE BERNS
STEVE BERNS                             Director and President
                                        (Principal Executive Officer)

/S/ EUGENE F. GIAQUINTO
EUGENE F. GIAQUINTO                     Chairman of the Board of Directors


/S/ BILL LEVINE
BILL LEVINE                             Director

/S/ MUNEAKI MASUDA
MUNEAKI MASUDA                          Director

/S/ SETH A. REAMES
SETH A. REAMES                          Director

/S/ KARL D. WETZEL
KARL D. WETZEL                          Chief Financial Officer
                                        (Principal Financial and Accounting
                                        Officer)
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report of ARC Wireless Solutions,
Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven
Olson, Acting Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:





(1) 
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) 
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Date: May
10, 2010




By:
                /s/
      Steven OlsonName:   
      Steven OlsonTitle:     Acting Principal Financial
  Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                       5,497,524
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,612,968
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  7,644,601
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,998,878
<PP&E>                                       2,780,850
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              45,229,372
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,554,752
<BONDS>                                     16,196,670
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          231,130
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,210
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,239,595
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                45,229,372
<SALES>                                     12,410,970
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,410,970
<CGS>                                       10,774,398
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,774,398
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,479,296
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             533,105
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                478,853
<INCOME-TAX>                                    25,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            453,853
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   453,853
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>
Opinion issued October 31, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-23-00430-CV

———————————

IVAN MONTALVO, Appellant

V.

CITY OF HITCHCOCK, Appellee

On Appeal from the 122nd District Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 21-CV-1200

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Ivan Montalvo, filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s 

February 21, 2023 final judgment dismissing the underlying cause for want of 

prosecution. Appellant has failed to timely file a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a) 

(governing time to file brief).
2

On June 9, 2023, the court reporter notified the Court that no reporter’s record 

was taken in this case, and on June 26, 2023, the clerk’s record was filed. 

Accordingly, appellant’s brief was due to be filed on or before July 26, 2023. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). Appellant did not file an appellant’s brief.

On August 15, 2023, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that this appeal 

was subject to dismissal unless a brief, or a motion to extend time to file a brief, was 

filed within ten days of the notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a) (governing failure of 

appellant to file brief), 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal of appeal for want of 

prosecution), 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case for failure to comply 

with notice from Clerk of Court). Despite the notice that this appeal was subject to 

dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX.R. APP. 

P. 42.3(b), 43.2(f). All pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Rivas-Molloy, and Guerra.
# L_2009322EN.01003701.xml

| 9.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 322/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 322/37

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 1 December 2009

appointing the Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union

(2009/911/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 240(2), first subparagraph, thereof,

Whereas the Secretary-General of the Council should be appointed,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Pierre de BOISSIEU is hereby appointed Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union for the period from 1 December 2009 until the day after the European Council meeting of June 2011.

Article 2

This Decision shall be notified to Mr Pierre de BOISSIEU by the President of the Council.

It shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 1 December 2009.

For the Council

The President

B. ASK

---