alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2009281EN.01000101.xml

| 28.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 281/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 281/1

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1016/2009

of 27 October 2009

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in particular Article 138(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 28 October 2009.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 October 2009.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.

2

---

ANNEX

Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

| (EUR/100 kg) |
| --- |
| CN code | Third country code (1) | Standard import value |
| 0702 00 00 | MA | 32,9 |
| MK | 21,1 |
| TR | 64,0 |
| ZZ | 39,3 |
| 0707 00 05 | TR | 127,9 |
| ZZ | 127,9 |
| 0709 90 70 | MA | 110,6 |
| TR | 114,0 |
| ZZ | 112,3 |
| 0805 50 10 | AR | 67,6 |
| TR | 74,5 |
| ZA | 80,0 |
| ZZ | 74,0 |
| 0806 10 10 | BR | 206,0 |
| TR | 118,8 |
| US | 238,2 |
| ZZ | 187,7 |
| 0808 10 80 | AU | 182,8 |
| CL | 114,8 |
| MK | 16,1 |
| NZ | 89,7 |
| US | 116,2 |
| ZA | 73,6 |
| ZZ | 98,9 |
| 0808 20 50 | CN | 64,7 |
| ZZ | 64,7 |

(EUR/100 kg)

CN code

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

0702 00 00

MA

32,9

MK

21,1

TR

64,0

ZZ

39,3

0707 00 05

TR

127,9

ZZ

127,9

0709 90 70

MA

110,6

TR

114,0

ZZ

112,3

0805 50 10

AR

67,6

TR

74,5

ZA

80,0

ZZ

74,0

0806 10 10

BR

206,0

TR

118,8

US

238,2

ZZ

187,7

0808 10 80

AU

182,8

CL

114,8

MK

16,1

NZ

89,7

US

116,2

ZA

73,6

ZZ

98,9

0808 20 50

CN

64,7

ZZ

64,7

---

(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
  ZZ
  ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

---
# EUR-Lex - 32009M5630 - EN

*|*

# 32009M5630

**Commission Decision of 25/09/2009 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No COMP/M.5630 - MD INVESTORS / METALDYNE) according to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*
Official Journal 237 , 02/10/2009 P. 0002 - 0002 *

|COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES |

Brussels , 25.9.2009

SG-Greffe(2009) D/5652

C(2009) 7516

PUBLIC VERSION

MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

To the notifying party:

Dear Madam and Sirs,

Subject: Case No COMP/M.5630 – MD INVESTORS/ METALDYNE Notification of 27/08/2009 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 208, 03/09/2009, p. 18.

1. On 27/08/2009, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 by which MD Investors Corporation (USA), indirectly solely controlled by The Carlyle Group (USA), acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of parts of Metaldyne Corporation as specified in the Purchase Agreement of 7 August 2009 ("the Target", USA) by way of purchase of assets.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for The Carlyle Group: private equity investment

- for MD Investors Corporation: private equity investment

- for the Target: manufacture and sale of metal components for light-duty motor vehicles to automotive OEM and Tier 1 automotive suppliers.

3. After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 and of paragraph 5(c) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [2] .

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004.

For the Commission (signed) Philip LOWE Director General

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

[2] OJ C 56, 05.3.2005, p. 32.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1702

REGINALD LEE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

KEVIN CLARK; JOHN DOE, JR.; RICHARD ROE, Officer, in their

individual and official capacities; BALTIMORE POLICE DEPARTMENT;

THEO FLEET, Officer,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

MARTIN O’MALLEY; DOUGLAS L. PATTERSON; BALTIMORE CITY COUNCIL;

CITY OF BALTIMORE; SHEILA DIXON,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge.

(1:05-cv-00897-WDQ)

Submitted: February 21, 2008 Decided: February 25, 2008

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
- 2 -

Reginald Lee, Appellant Pro Se. Karen Stakem Hornig, Assistant

Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland; Patrick Donald Sheridan,

William Rowe Phelan, Jr., BALTIMORE POLICE DEPARTMENT, Baltimore,

Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Reginald Lee appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. See Lee v. Clark,

No. 1:05-cv-00897-WDQ (D. Md. June 26, 2007). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1


                              C-CAR SUBSIDIARIES
                                March 16, 1998


PLAINS CHEVROLET, INC.
2200 I-40 East (79103)
P.O. Box 32266 (79120-2266)
(806) 374-4611
a Texas corporation

WESTGATE CHEVROLET, INC.
7300 I-40 West
P.O. Box 50850
Amarillo, Texas 79159
(806) 355-7201
a Texas corporation

QUALITY NISSAN, INC.
4121 S. Georgia (79109)
P.O. Box 8879 (79114)
Amarillo, Texas
(806) 354-3550
a Texas corporation

MIDWAY CHEVROLET, INC.
I-27 & Rockwell Road (79015)
P.O. Box 31447 (79120)
Canyon, Texas
(806) 655-7774
a Texas corporation

WORKING MAN'S CREDIT PLAN, INC.
D/B/A CROSS-CONTINENT AUTO WORLD
2400 I-40 East
Amarillo, Texas 79109
(806) 373-6161
a Texas corporation

ALLIED 2000 COLLISION CENTER, INC.
2316 I-40 East
Amarillo, Texas 79103
(806) 374-9448
a Texas corporation

CROSS COUNTRY DODGE, INC.,
D/B/A LYNN HICKEY DODGE
4025 N. May Avenue (73112)
P.O. Box 12922 (73157)
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
(405) 946-0601
an Oklahoma corporation

DOUGLAS MOTORS, INC.
D/B/A DENVER TOYOTA
7300 N. Broadway
Denver, CO 80221
(303) 426-1026
a Colorado corporation

T-WEST SALES & SERVICE, INC.
D/B/A TOYOTA WEST
2025 S. Decatur Blvd.
(effective 4-98 6300 W. Sahara)
Las Vegas, Nevada 89102
(702) 871-4111
a Nevada corporation

SAHARA NISSAN, INC.,
D/B/A NISSAN WEST
5050 W. Sahara
Las Vegas, Nevada 89102
702/871-7000
a Nevada corporation

JRJ INVESTMENTS, INC.
D/B/A CHAISSON MOTOR CARS
2333 S. Decatur
Las Vegas, Nevada 89102
(702) 871-1010

D/B/A CHAISSON BMW
261 Auto Mall Drive
Henderson, Nevada
(702) 257-1010
a Nevada corporation

<PAGE>

PMWQ, INC.
1115 S. Taylor
Amarillo, Texas 79101
(806) 374-8653
a Nevada corporation

SAHARA IMPORTS, INC.
(empty corporation)
a Nevada corporation

C-CAR AUTO WHOLESALERS, INC.
(empty corporation)
a Nevada corporation
# L_2009117EN.01000101.xml

| 12.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 117/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 117/1

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 382/2009

of 11 May 2009

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in particular Article 138(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 12 May 2009.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 May 2009.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.

2

---

ANNEX

Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

| (EUR/100 kg) |
| --- |
| CN code | Third country code (1) | Standard import value |
| 0702 00 00 | MA | 89,6 |
| TN | 115,0 |
| TR | 110,4 |
| ZZ | 105,0 |
| 0707 00 05 | MA | 32,7 |
| TR | 135,2 |
| ZZ | 84,0 |
| 0709 90 70 | TR | 105,4 |
| ZZ | 105,4 |
| 0805 10 20 | EG | 45,9 |
| IL | 55,9 |
| MA | 53,1 |
| TN | 52,5 |
| TR | 76,0 |
| US | 68,2 |
| ZZ | 58,6 |
| 0805 50 10 | TR | 49,4 |
| ZA | 56,2 |
| ZZ | 52,8 |
| 0808 10 80 | AR | 80,1 |
| BR | 67,5 |
| CA | 127,2 |
| CL | 73,8 |
| CN | 98,2 |
| NZ | 98,3 |
| US | 128,2 |
| UY | 66,3 |
| ZA | 81,6 |
| ZZ | 91,2 |

(EUR/100 kg)

CN code

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

0702 00 00

MA

89,6

TN

115,0

TR

110,4

ZZ

105,0

0707 00 05

MA

32,7

TR

135,2

ZZ

84,0

0709 90 70

TR

105,4

ZZ

105,4

0805 10 20

EG

45,9

IL

55,9

MA

53,1

TN

52,5

TR

76,0

US

68,2

ZZ

58,6

0805 50 10

TR

49,4

ZA

56,2

ZZ

52,8

0808 10 80

AR

80,1

BR

67,5

CA

127,2

CL

73,8

CN

98,2

NZ

98,3

US

128,2

UY

66,3

ZA

81,6

ZZ

91,2

---

(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
  ZZ
  ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

---
#### Julio Ruiz et al., Appellants, v City of New York, Respondent.

— In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for negligence, false arrest and malicious prosecution, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lerner, J.), dated February 19, 1986, which denied their motion to compel the District Attorney of Queens County, a nonparty, to produce a copy of an official case file in the underlying criminal action brought against the plaintiff Julio Ruiz.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The plaintiffs sought to inspect the case file maintained by the Queens County District Attorney in a criminal action brought against the plaintiff Julio Ruiz. The instant civil proceeding seeks to recover damages for alleged physical injuries suffered by Julio Ruiz at the hands of the police as he was being arrested for the crimes charged in the criminal action. The Supreme Court denied the motion on the ground that the plaintiffs failed to specify with sufficient particularity the items sought to be discovered. We affirm, although for different reasons.

There is no proof in the record that the District Attorney of Queens County was properly served with the notice of motion "in the same manner as a summons” (CPLR 3120 [b]). Thus, the plaintiffs have failed to meet the jurisdictional requirements of CPLR 3120 for seeking discovery and inspection against a nonparty.

We note that the District Attorney has made the file sought by the plaintiffs available to their adversary in the instant matter. Accordingly, the plaintiffs if they be so advised should proceed against the Corporation Counsel of the City of New York for the production of the District Attorney’s file. Thompson, J. P., Brown, Eiber and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
# L_2009306EN.01002001.xml

| 20.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 306/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 306/20

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1114/2009

of 19 November 2009

granting no export refund for skimmed milk powder in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 619/2008

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1), and in particular Article 164(2), in conjunction with Article 4, thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 619/2008 of 27 June 2008 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds concerning certain milk products (2) provides for a standing invitation to tender procedure. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 619/2008 of 27 June 2008 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds concerning certain milk products (2) provides for a standing invitation to tender procedure.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 6 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1454/2007 of 10 December 2007 laying down common rules for establishing a tender procedure for fixing export refunds for certain agricultural products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate not to grant any refund for the tendering period ending on 17 November 2009. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 6 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1454/2007 of 10 December 2007 laying down common rules for establishing a tender procedure for fixing export refunds for certain agricultural products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate not to grant any refund for the tendering period ending on 17 November 2009.

| (3) | The Management Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its Chair, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Management Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its Chair,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the standing invitation to tender opened by Regulation (EC) No 619/2008, for the tendering period ending on 17 November 2009, no export refund shall be granted for the product and destinations referred to in point (c) of Article 1 and in Article 2 respectively of that Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 20 November 2009.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 November 2009.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 168, 28.6.2008, p. 20.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 325, 11.12.2007, p. 69.

3

---
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Leonardo Lopez, * From the 106th District Court

 of Dawson County,

 Trial Court No. 13-7306.

Vs. No. 11-14-00357-CR * December 30, 2016

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Wright, C.J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that 

there is no error in the judgments below. Therefore, in accordance with this 

court’s opinion, the judgments of the trial court are in all things affirmed.
DOI/DOE FY 2014 Hydrograph 

(TWG passed by consensus on 6/26/13) 

Motion proposed by Cliff Barrett, seconded by Bill Davis: TWG recommends to AMWG to 

recommend to the Secretary of the Interior, approval of the DOI-DOE Proposed Hydrograph for 

Water Year 2014 as defined in the attached Water Year 2014 Hydrograph. (see below) 

• Annual Release Volumes will be determined in compliance with the 2007 Interim 

Guidelines (in consultation with the Basin States as appropriate). 

 

• Monthly release Volumes are anticipated to shift depending upon: (1) the Annual 

Release Volume, and (2) the magnitude of a potential High Flow Experiment. 

• Monthly Release Volumes may vary within the targets identified below. Any remaining 

monthly operational flexibility will be used for existing power production operations under 

the Modified Low Fluctuating Flow (MLFF) alternative selected by the 1996 ROD and 

contained in the 1995 FEIS and in compliance with all applicable NEPA compliance 

documents (HFE EA, NNFC EA, 2007 IG). 

 

• Release objective for June is 600 kaf to 650 kaf . 

• Release objective for August is 800 kaf. 

 

• Release objective for September and October is 600 kaf to 630 kaf. 

 

• Monthly Release Volumes will generally strive to maintain 600 kaf levels in the spring/fall 

timeframe and 800 kaf in December/January and July/August timeframe. 

 

• Additionally, the Bureau of Reclamation will continue to apply best professional judgment 

in conducting actual operations and in response to changing conditions throughout the 

water year. Such efforts will continue to be undertaken in coordination with the DOI/DOE 

agencies, and after consultation with the Basin States as appropriate, to consider 

changing conditions and adjust projected operations in a manner consistent with the 

objectives of these parameters as stated above and pursuant to the Law of the River.
RODNEY J. SAMUEL II

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF F ILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 2903

Opinion filed October 19, 2016.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus

-- Original Jurisdiction

.

Rodney J. Samuel II, pro se , Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petitio n for writ of mandamus is denied. See Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm’n

,

807 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). We encourage the circuit court to continue its

efforts to expeditiously dispose of the motion pending below.

ROBERTS, C.J., MAKAR and BILBREY, JJ., CONC UR.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2021 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2021

        To prohibit the expenditure of Federal funds to Amtrak.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 23, 2015

  Mr. Salmon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To prohibit the expenditure of Federal funds to Amtrak.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR AMTRAK.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no Federal funds shall 
be made available to Amtrak.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-11132
SHIRLENE GRAY

Plaintiff - Appellant

v. SAGE TELECOM INC

Defendant - Appellee
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Cause No. 3:05-CV-1677 Before KING, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The judgment of the district court is A FFIRMED for essentially the reasons given by the district court in its Memorandum Opinion and Order entered October 3, 2006, which cannot be improved upon. The district court, in perhapsan excessofcaution, discussed the impact ofDesert Palace, Inc. v. Costa, 539 U.S. 90 (2003), on claims of retaliation under Title VII. In plaintiffUnited States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D November 7, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 06-11132

2 appellant Shirlene Gray’s appellate brief, that issue is inadequately briefed (as it was in the district court), and in affirming the district court’sjudgment, we do not address (because we need not, see L & A Contracting Co. v. Southern ConcreteServices, Inc., 17 F.3d 106, 113 (5th Cir. 1994)) that issue or the district court’s conclusions with respect thereto. AFFIRMED.