alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
LK/Pro Mo 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JONATHAN ELDON HUNSAKER; 

CHERYL LYNN HUNSAKER, 

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

 v. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 19-35698 

D.C. No. 6:16-cv-00386-MC 

District of Oregon, 

Eugene 

ORDER

Appellant’s unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 13) for voluntary 

dismissal is granted. This appeal is dismissed. See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b).

This order served on the district court shall act as and for the mandate of this 

court.

FOR THE COURT:

MOLLY C. DWYER

CLERK OF COURT

By: Linda K. King

Deputy Clerk

Ninth Circuit Rule 27-7

FILED

DEC 30 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

Case 6:16-cv-00386-MC Document 47 Filed 12/30/19 Page 1 of 1
U.S. Department of the Interior

U.S. Geological Survey

Riparian vegetation monifor the Colorado River Ecosystem

Barbara E. Ralston
Introduction- Goal 6 Riparian 

Spring Communities Management Objectives – 7

 Associated with a specific element of the ri Define hydrological areas, habitats and elem Some elements in 1 MO are a component of 

 6.1

 Maintain marsh community abundance, composition, and 

such a manner that native species are not lost. 

 6.2 Maintain NHWZ community patch number and distribution

area to be no lower than values estimated for 1984.

 6.4 Maintain sand-beach community abundance, composition

the Colorado River ecosystem at the target level.
Previous sampling approache

 EIS – debris fan and marshes – intensiv

productivity- 2 sites/reach/independent 

 Post EIS- vegetation patches – debris f

estimated cover/composition – few sitesite/reach)/Independent bird surveys

 2001-04 TEM – randomized, rotated plo

meter plots/year (240 sq m) sampled at stages. Independent of geomorphic fea

 2006-2009 – randomized plots – 80 larg

associated with stage elevations, but nspecific geomorphic features.
Protocol Review Panel 

Recommendations Review Management Objectives for rele

operations, clarity and realism

 Many springs are associated with ground-water disc

river.

 The old high water zone is a relict of the historic rive

unlikely to be maintained w/o planting, irrigation and 

 Vegetation reduction may be necessary to reach ma

objectives associated with sand beach community.

 NHWZ is dominated by tamarisk and may not be a d

maintain, though it is part of the NHWZ. Patch numbrealistic metric given reduced disturbance magnitud

 Maintenance of marshes should be a priority for ma Animal monitoring should be associated with CMIN 

coordinated with Grand Canyon National Park
Protocol Review Panel 

Recommendations Vegetation Sampling Continue the Generalized Random Sam

Approach

 Stratify sampling by incorporate Debris

complexes as sampling unit. – distance width does not link to geomorphic proc

 Determine frequency needed for sampl
Vegetation sampling approac

Floristic area influenceon vegetation

Great BasinColorado PlateauSonoran Desert
Vegetation sampling approac

Four General Reaches –tributary/dam effectsGlen CanyonMarble Canyon

Upper/lower

Eastern Grand CanyonWestern Grand Canyon
Vegetation sampling approac

Primary sampling unit within each larger tributary reach
Vegetation sampling approac

Randomized sampling of debris-fan eddysand channel margin within four larger reaches- using shoreline map and debris fan GIS coverage for site selection.Power analysis of sampling effort within each reach
Animal sampling

Coordinate with NPS in bird surveysIncrease sample sites and tripsEvaluate utility of arthropod sampling following review of Glen Canyon pilot study – January reporting meeting
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2222

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to repeal the financial

limitation on rehabilitation services under part B of the Medicare Program.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 25, 1998

Mr. GRASSLEY (for himself, Mr. REID, Mr. HOLLINGS, and Mr. D’AMATO) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to repeal

the financial limitation on rehabilitation services under

part B of the Medicare Program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reinstatement of the

5 Medicare Rehabilitation Benefit Act of 1998’’.

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF FINANCIAL LIMITATION ON REHABILI7 TATION SERVICES.

8 (a) REPEAL.—
2

•S 2222 IS

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 1833 of the Social

2 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395l) is amended by strik3 ing subsection (g).

4 (2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made

5 by paragraph (1) shall apply to services furnished on

6 or after January 1, 1999.

7 (b) OFFSETTING PORTION OF ADDITIONAL EXPEND8 ITURES THROUGH PAYMENT REFORM.—

9 (1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other

10 provision of law, for outpatient physical therapy

11 services, outpatient occupational therapy services,

12 and outpatient speech-language pathology services

13 covered under title XVIII of the Social Security Act

14 and furnished on or after January 1, 2000, the Sec15 retary of Health and Human Services shall imple16 ment a new payment methodology based on the clas17 sification of individuals by diagnostic category, func18 tional status, and prior use of services in both inpa19 tient and outpatient settings.

20 (2) BUDGET NEUTRALITY IN IMPLEMENTA21 TION.—Such payment methodology shall be designed

22 so that the methodology, taking into account the in23 creased expenditures resulting from the amendment

24 made by subsection (a), does not result in any in25 crease or decrease in the expenditures under title
3

•S 2222 IS

1 XVIII of the Social Security Act on a fiscal year

2 basis.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-3039
KEVIN POTTER; MARGUERITE C. POTTER, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY; STEPHANIE E. MOORE, Defendants - Appellees, and CRESTWOOD GOLF CLUB, INCORPORATED; CRESTWOOD PARTNERSHIP; JOHN BOYD; WALTER BRYANT; DALE BRYANT; GEORGE SPRUCE MCCAIN; CLAUDE MCCAIN; JACK DICKEY; DICKEY COMPANY; JAMES MOSTELLER, III; KELLY CANNON; MCCAIN FINANCIAL GROUP, INCORPORATED; SOUTH CAROLINA NATIONAL BANK; WILLIAM BERRY; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL; MICHAEL CHAPPELL; JAMES S. WILLIAMSON, JR., Defendants.

No. 95-3200
KEVIN POTTER; MARGUERITE C. POTTER, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus2 SOUTH CAROLINA NATIONAL BANK; WILLIAM BERRY, Defendants - Appellees, and CRESTWOOD GOLF CLUB, INCORPORATED; CRESTWOOD PARTNERSHIP; JOHN BOYD; WALTER BRYANT; DALE BRYANT; GEORGE SPRUCE MCCAIN; CLAUDE MCCAIN; JACK DICKEY; DICKEY COMPANY; JAMES MOSTELLER, III; KELLY CANNON; MCCAIN FINANCIAL GROUP, INCORPORATED; SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY; STEPHANIE E. MOORE; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL; MICHAEL CHAPPELL; JAMES S. WILLIAMSON, JR., Defendants.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-94-2047-5-22-BC) Submitted: April 16, 1996 Decided: May 24, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kevin Potter, Marguerite C. Potter, Appellants Pro Se. Mark Wester McKnight, Charleston, South Carolina; Stanley Harold McGuffin, Sr., SINKLER & BOYD, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal from the district court's orders discussingsome, but not all, defendants in Appellants' civil action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Plant Genetic Resources Conservation Unit: Griffin, GA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Griffin, Georgia Plant Genetic Resources Conservation Unit Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications
- About PGRCU
- Multistate Research Project S-009
- PGRCU Personnel Directory
- Unit News and Events
- Collaborations
- Career Opportunities

Collaborations The Plant Genetic Resources Conservation Unit has a long and productive history of collaborative research involving stakeholders.  Current collaborators and projects:  Regeneration of Capsicum Germplasm in the USDA Genebank  Regeneration, Characterization, and Maintenance of the U.S. Peanut Germplasm Collection  Selection of Superior Calyx and Seed Producing Hibiscus Sabdariffa Genotypes for New Food and Tea Production  Genome-wide Association Analysis and Genomic Prediction of Seed Mineral Concentration in the USDA Cowpea Germplasm  Evaluation and Characterization of Peanut Wild Species, Synthetic Hybrids, and Introgression Lines


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Mitchell Cohen, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Asta Funding, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d – 15(f)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financialreporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting andthe preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles; (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.May 15, 2007/s/ Mitchell Cohen
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 24, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00348

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF V.R.J.,

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County , Texas

Trial Court No. 1997EM504318 Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was originally due August 26, 2019; however, the court granted an extension of time until September 25. Appellant has filed a motion asking for an additional thirty day extension of time to file the brief.

We grant the motion and order appellant’s brief due October 25, 2019 . The court does not ordinarily grant extensions of more than sixty days beyond the original due date. Counsel is therefore advised that no further extensions of time will be granted absent a motion, filed before the brief is due, that (1) demonstrates extraordinary circumstances justifying further delay, (2) advises the court of the efforts counsel has expended in preparing the brief, and (3) provides the court reasonable assurance that the brief will be completed and filed by the requ ested extended

deadline.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Jus tice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 24th day of September, 2019

.

___________________________________ LUZ ESTRADA

, Chief Deputy Clerk
DUCHESNE R AB UINTA R NEAR RANDLETT, UT.Latitude: 40.207Longitude: -109.861Elevation: 4873

DUCHESNE R AB UINTA R NEAR RANDLETT, UT.

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Lakefork #3 Site Page...



Lakefork #3

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Wolf Creek Peak Site Page...



Wolf Creek Peak

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Mountain Home Site Page...



Mountain Home

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Little Red Fox Site Page...



Little Red Fox

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Brown Duck Site Page...



Brown Duck

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Currant Creek Site Page...



Currant Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Daniels-Strawberry Site Page...



Daniels-Strawberry

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Five Points Lake Site Page...



Five Points Lake

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Lakefork Basin Site Page...



Lakefork Basin

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Wilbur Bench Site Page...



Wilbur Bench

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Lakefork #1 Site Page...



Lakefork #1

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Rock Creek Site Page...



Rock Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Strawberry Divide Site Page...



Strawberry Divide

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Trial Lake Site Page...



Trial Lake

Courtesy NRCS - Go to White River #1 Site Page...



White River #1
#### PENDERGAST v. UNION RY. CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

December 18, 1896.)

, Action by ICate Pendergast against the Union Railway Company.

No opinion. Motion denied. See 41 N. Y. Supp. 927.
Exhibit 8.1





List of Subsidiaries*





Mega Retail Ltd. (Formerly known as The Blue Square Chain Investments & Properties Ltd.)





Dor Alon Energy in Israel (1988) Ltd.





Blue Square Real Estate Ltd.





Eden Briut Teva Market Ltd.





Bee Group Retail Ltd. (Formerly known as Hamachsan Hamerkazi Kfar Hasha’ashuim Ltd.).





Vardinon Textile Ltd.





Naaman Porcelain Ltd.





Diners Club Israel Ltd.





Radio Non Stop Ltd.





Bee Square Real Estate Logistic Center Ltd.





Square Real Estate Residence Ltd.





Square Real Estate Tel Aviv Market Ltd.





Dor Alon Gas Technology Ltd.





Dor Alon Retail Sites Management Ltd.





Dor Alon Holdings (2004) Ltd.





Alon Cellular Ltd.





*All of our subsidiaries are incorporated in Israel
# C_2009201EN.01000101.xml

| 26.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5545 — Arcelormittal/Noble European Holding)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 201/01

On 7 July 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5545. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5545. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of IDX Systems
Corporation (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, James H. Crook, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and John A. Kane, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                                                
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------
|                       |  | 
|Date: November 8, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/    JAMES H. CROOK,
JR.                     
|                       |  |  |  | James H. Crook, Jr.                            
|                       |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer                        
|                       |  | 
|Date: November 8, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/    JOHN A. KANE                            
|                       |  |  |  | John A. Kane                                   
|                       |  |  |  | Sr. Vice President, Finance and Administration,
|                       |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of
the Company for the periods presented.
  /s/ Robert J. Michel

Robert J. MichelChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
p-schxvib10x21






P-SCH-VIB(10/21)  1      PRUCO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, PHOENIX, ARIZONA    INDEX LINKED VARIABLE INCOME BENEFIT SCHEDULE SUPPLEMENT      Annuity Number: [001-0001]      Effective Date:  [Effective Date of Rider]    [Protected Life] [Joint Protected Lives] on the Effective Date:    [John Doe]   Date of Birth: [October 21, 1972]  [[Mary Doe]   Date of Birth: [October 15, 1972]]    Income Percentage:     Age on Effective Date Protected Life Income  Percentages  Joint Protected Lives  Income Percentages  [45-49 [2.50% [2.05%  50-54 2.90% 2.55%  55-59 3.20% 2.85%  60-64 3.55% 3.20%  65-69 4.00% 3.65%  70-74 4.60% 4.25%  75-79 5.30% 4.95%  80] 5.90%] 5.55%]    Income Deferral Rate:    Age on Effective Date Protected Life Income  Deferral Rate Percentage  Joint Protected Lives  Income Deferral Rate  Percentage  [45-49 [0.05% [0.05%  50-54 0.10% 0.10%  55-59 0.10% 0.10%  60-64 0.15% 0.15%  65-69 0.20% 0.20%  70-74 0.25% 0.25%  75-79 0.35% 0.35%  80] 0.40%] 0.40%]    Minimum Insured Income Stage Payment: [$100]    Charge for the Rider:  Assessed annually on the Index Anniversary at a rate of [1.45]%    Waiting Period: [3rd] anniversary of the Effective Date