alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                                              9
<MULTIPLIER>                                        1000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS                            
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997   
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                            18,980
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             7,072
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                       0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                       0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       13,534
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           347,252
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             337,639
<LOANS>                                        1,086,026
<ALLOWANCE>                                        4,017
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,509,514
<DEPOSITS>                                     1,154,455
<SHORT-TERM>                                      56,805
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               30,858
<LONG-TERM>                                       75,307
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           2,013
<OTHER-SE>                                       190,076
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 1,509,514
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   21,066
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  5,559
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                      90
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  26,715
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                12,396
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                14,467
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             12,248
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        219
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                     0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    5,684
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    7,679
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         4,815
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                       4,815
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.29
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                      3.38
<LOANS-NON>                                        1,314
<LOANS-PAST>                                           0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                       0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                       77
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   3,850
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                         64
<RECOVERIES>                                          12
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  4,017
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               4,017
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                0
        


</TABLE>
GCDAMP River Trips and Field Activities, late August to mid-October 2017.

Launch

Take 

out Project Number, Agency, and Project Description Location

16-Aug 1-Sep Project 2: GCMRC water quality/fine sediment monitoring Grand Canyon

19-Aug 5-Sep Project 6: USFWS/GCMRC mainstem Colorado R. humpback 

chub aggregation monitoring Grand Canyon

23-Aug 8-Sep Project 11: GCMRC riparian vegetation monitoring Grand Canyon

9-Sep 18-Sep Hopi Tribe cultural monitoring Grand Canyon

12-Sep 15-Sep Project 9: AGFD Lees Ferry trout population monitoring Glen Canyon

15-Sep 28-Sep Projects 5 & 6: GCRMC Aquatic food base monitoring;

USFWS/GCMRC mainstem Colorado R. fish monitoring (seining) Grand Canyon

19-Sep 21-Sep Project 9: GCMRC rainbow trout early lifestage study Glen Canyon

19-Sep 29-Sep Project 7: USFWS humpback chub population monitoring in the 

Little Colorado River

Little Colorado 

River

28-Sep 18-Oct

Projects 7 & 9: GCMRC juvenile humpback chub monitoring 

near the Little Colorado River confluence; GCMRC trout 

movement from Glen Canyon

Glen Canyon & 

Grand Canyon

29-Sep 16-Oct Projects 3 & 11: GCMRC/NAU long-term campsite and sandbar 

monitoring, GCMRC riparian vegetation monitoring Grand Canyon

6-Oct 10-Oct Project 6: AGFD maninstem Colorado R. fish monitoring 

downstream of Diamond Creek Grand Canyon

17-Oct 27-Oct Project 7: USFWS humpback chub population monitoring in the 

Little Colorado River

Little Colorado 

River
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

PAMELA K. CRANE, No. 6:15-cv-2199-YY

Plaintiff,

v. 

 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL ORDER

SECURITY, 

 Defendant.

HERNANDEZ, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge You issued a Findings and Recommendation (#39) on September 26,

2017, in which she recommends that this Court award Plaintiff fees under the Equal Access to

Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount of $7,992.62. The matter is now before me

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were

timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. ReynaTapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840

F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's

1 - ORDER
report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find

no error. 

CONCLUSION 

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge You's Findings & Recommendation [39].

Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion for fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28, U.S.C. §

2412(d), [30], is granted in the amount of $7,992.62. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this day of , 2017.

 

MARCO A. HERNANDEZ

United States District Judge

2 - ORDER
#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Storage                    
csv

      Pool Elevation                    
csv

#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Storage                    
json

      Pool Elevation                    
json
#### Dixon *v.*The State.

Appeal from Chambers Circuit Court.

Tried before tbe Hon. N. D. Denson.

No counsel marked as appearing for appellant.

Chas. G. Brown, Attorney-General, for tbe State.

Tbe appellant in this casé was indicted, tried and convicted of arson, tbe building set fire to being a church; and ivas sentenced to tbe penitentiary for two years.

Tbe judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Opinion by

Haralson, J.
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation of our report, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Entravision Communications Corporation, dated
February 7, 2003, included in this Form 10-K/A of Univision Communications, Inc., in the previously filed Registration Statements of Univision
Communications, Inc. on Form S-8 File Nos. 333-34559, 333-47017, 333-56794 and Form S-3 File
No. 333-57712.

|                                    |                           
|----------------------------------- | --------------------------
|                                    | /s/MCGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP
|                                    |                           
|Pasadena, California
March 21, 2003 |                           

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1



Informational Addendum to Report on Form 10-Q

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Not Filed Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934



The undersigned Chief Executive Officer of OYO Geospace Corporation does hereby certify as follows:



Solely for the purpose of meeting the requirements of
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and solely to the extent this certification may be applicable to this Report on Form 10-Q, the undersigned hereby certify that this Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in this Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OYO Geospace Corporation.



/s/    Gary D. OwensName:

Gary D. OwensTitle:

Chief Executive OfficerFebruary 6, 2006
#### In re CURTISS’ ESTATE.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 6, 1896.)

Judicial settlement of the accounts and of the proceedings of Frank Curtiss and Frederick De Billier, as executors of and trustees under the last will and testament of Abijah Curtiss, deceased, and their application for leave to resign as such executors and trustees.

No opinion. Decree affirmed upon the opinions of the surrogate of Westchester county (37 N. Y. Supp. 586), with costs to all parties payable out of the estate. See 39 N. Y. Supp. 1123.
RIO HONDO NEAR ROSWELL, NMLatitude: 33.409Longitude: -104.472Elevation: 3507

RIO HONDO NEAR ROSWELL, NM

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Sierra Blanca Site Page...



Sierra Blanca
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2084 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to add certain tax-related crimes 

to the definition of aggravated identity theft, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 29, 2015 

Mr. MARCHANT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to add certain taxrelated crimes to the definition of aggravated identity 

theft, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Taxpayer Identity 

5 Theft Prevention and Enforcement Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TAX-RELATED CRIMES. 

7 Section 1028A(c) of title 18, United States Code, is 

8 amended— 

9 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of paragraph 

10 (10); 


Emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2084 IH

1 (2) by striking the period in paragraph (11) 

2 and adding a semicolon; and 

3 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(12) any provision of subchapter A of chapter 

5 75 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating 

6 to crimes under the Internal Revenue Code); or 

7 ‘‘(13) any of the following when committed in 

8 connection with the filing of a return of tax under 

9 subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986: 

10 ‘‘(A) Section 286 (relating to conspiracy to 

11 defraud the Government with respect to 

12 claims). 

13 ‘‘(B) Section 287 (relating to false, ficti14 tious or fraudulent claims). 

15 ‘‘(C) Section 371 (relating to conspiracy to 

16 commit any offense against the United States, 

17 or to defraud the United States).’’. 

Æ 


Emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-31338

Summary Calendar

 

ELAINE BARTHOLOMEW, 

as next friend Dagny Mahaffey, 

as next friend Shirlaine Mitchell, 

minors,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

LARRY G. MASSANARI,

ACTING COMMISSIONER OF

SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 00-CV-50-J

--------------------

August 6, 2001

Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Elaine Bartholomew appeals from the district court’s

judgment affirming the denial of her claim for surviving child

benefits. She argues that substantial evidence did not support

the Commissioner’s decision, the administrative law judge (ALJ)

failed to develop the record, the ALJ did not properly weigh the
No. 00-31338

-2-

evidence, and the ALJ improperly placed a high burden of proof on

the claimants. 

Judicial review of the Commissioner’s decision to deny

benefits is limited to determining whether that decision is

supported by substantial evidence and whether the proper legal

standards are applied. Harris v. Apfel, 209 F.3d 413, 417 (5th

Cir. 2000); Stone v. Heckler, 715 F.2d 179, 180-81, 184 (5th Cir.

1983). “The [Commissioner], not the courts, has the duty to

weigh the evidence, resolve material conflicts in the evidence,

and decide the case.” Chaparro v. Bowen, 815 F.2d 1008, 1011

(5th Cir. 1987). 

Given the evidence that the Arizona resident had used the

name and social security number of Curtis Clifford Mahaffey since

at least 1985 and Judy Griffen’s corroborating identification of

her brother, which dates back to Mahaffey’s childhood, there were

credible evidentiary choices supporting the ALJ’s decision. 

Harris, 209 F.3d at 417. Although the Commissioner could have

investigated the matter further, there was credible substantial

evidence upon which the Commissioner could conclude that the

Arizona resident was the true owner of the disputed social

security number, and Bartholomew has failed to demonstrate that

the additional evidence might have altered the result. Carey v.

Apfel, 230 F.3d 131, 142 (5th Cir. 2000). “In short, there is

conflicting evidence on the issue . . ., and the [ALJ’s]

determination must be respected because it is supported by

substantial credible evidence.” See Ryan v. Bowen, 799 F.2d 147,
No. 00-31338

-3-

148 (5th Cir. 1986). Accordingly, the judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.
Presidential Documents

50835 

Federal Register 

Vol. 86, No. 173 

Friday, September 10, 2021 

Title 3— 

The President 

Notice of September 9, 2021 

Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Certain Terrorist Attacks 

Consistent with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act, 50 U.S.C. 

1622(d), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency previously declared on September 14, 2001, in Proclamation 7463, with respect to the 

terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, and the continuing and immediate 

threat of further attacks on the United States. 

Because the terrorist threat continues, the national emergency declared on 

September 14, 2001, and the powers and authorities adopted to deal with 

that emergency must continue in effect beyond September 14, 2021. Therefore, I am continuing in effect for an additional year the national emergency 

that was declared on September 14, 2001, with respect to the terrorist 

threat. 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to 

the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

September 9, 2021. [FR Doc. 2021–19788 

Filed 9–9–21; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 3295–F1–P 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with FR_MEMO1BIDEN.EPS</GPH>
#### In the Matter of ABRAHAM J. ISSERMAN.

For the petitioner: *Mr. John O. Bigelow*and *Mr. Milton M. Unger.*

For the Essex County Ethics Committee: *Mr. Frederick C. Waldron.*

September 14, 1961.

Petitioner restored to the practice of law. Opinion reported at 35 *N. J.*198.
#### In the Matter of Violet S. Yaron, Respondent, v Nissim M. Yaron, Appellant. Commissioner of Social Services, as Assignee of Respondent.

— Order, Family Court of the State of New York, New York County (Elrich Eastman, J.), entered on or about May 13, 1985, and order of said court (Ruth Zuckerman, J.), entered on or about July 21, 1986, unanimously affirmed. Assignee of petitioner-respondent shall recover of appellant one bill of $75 costs and disbursements of these appeals. Motion by respondent-appellant to strike the brief of assignee of petitioner-respondent denied. No opinion. Concur— Murphy, P. J., Carro, Asch, Milonas and Rosenberger, JJ.
# ¥23-/S" ELECTRONIC RECORD COA# 02-14-00016-CR OFFENSE: OTHER CRIMINAL William J. Hiblerv. The State of 

## STYLE: Texas COUNTY: Denton COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRM TRIAL COURT: 211th District Court 

### DATE: 03/26/2015 Publish: NO TC CASE #: F-98-0563-C



### IN THE COURTOF CRIMINALAPPEALS William J. Hibler v. The State of STYLE: Texas CCA#: 

# ¥23-/g PRO SE FORDISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCAIS: 

# DATE: OS[/jLD/^PtS JUDGE: #k Ul*+*~^ Petition 

## CCADisposition: DATE: JUDGE: ; SIGNED: PUBLISH:
REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE: 

### PC:_ DNP:

MOTION FOR


### ELECTRONIC RECORD
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### APPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT DEANTE TRAMMELL DAVIS,

Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 2D22-1906 September 7, 2022 Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Philip J. Federico, Judge. Deante Trammell Davis, pro se. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. VILLANTI, KHOUZAM, and LABRIT, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Xerion  EcoSolutions  Group Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Robert
Skanes, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in this Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated this 15th day of August, 2005.


/s/ Robert Skanes
Robert Skanes
Principal Financial Officer
COLORADO RIVER AT RIVER SECTION 41Latitude: 34.688Longitude: -114.463Elevation: 455.30

Colorado River at River Section 41

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Gutz Peak Site Page...



Gutz Peak

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Gardner Peak Site Page...



Gardner Peak

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Rainbow Canyon Site Page...



Rainbow Canyon

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Bristlecone Trail Site Page...



Bristlecone Trail

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Lee Canyon Site Page...



Lee Canyon

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Fort Valley Site Page...



Fort Valley

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Mormon Mtn Summit Site Page...



Mormon Mtn Summit

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Nutrioso Site Page...



Nutrioso

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Chalender Site Page...



Chalender

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Baker Butte Smt Site Page...



Baker Butte Smt

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Corduroy Flat Site Page...



Corduroy Flat

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Defiance Mines Site Page...



Defiance Mines

Courtesy NRCS - Go to White River Nv Site Page...



White River Nv

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Suu Ranch Site Page...



Suu Ranch

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Kyle Canyon Site Page...



Kyle Canyon

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Hayford Peak Site Page...



Hayford Peak

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Pine Nut Site Page...



Pine Nut

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Sand Hollow Site Page...



Sand Hollow

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Cave Valley Site Page...



Cave Valley

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Vermillion Site Page...



Vermillion

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Baker Butte Site Page...



Baker Butte

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Baldy Site Page...



Baldy

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Harris Flat Site Page...



Harris Flat

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Heber Site Page...



Heber

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Kolob Site Page...



Kolob

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Little Grassy Site Page...



Little Grassy

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Long Flat Site Page...



Long Flat

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Long Valley Jct Site Page...



Long Valley Jct

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Maverick Fork Site Page...



Maverick Fork

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Midway Valley Site Page...



Midway Valley

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Mormon Mountain Site Page...



Mormon Mountain

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Promontory Site Page...



Promontory

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Ward Mountain Site Page...



Ward Mountain

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Webster Flat Site Page...



Webster Flat

Courtesy NRCS - Go to White Horse Lake Site Page...



White Horse Lake

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Snowslide Canyon Site Page...



Snowslide Canyon
### NUMBER 13
- 12
- 00 130
- CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI
- EDINBURG

IN RE CYPRESS TEXAS LLOYDS

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez , Benavides , and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam 1
Relator, Cypress Texas Lloyds , filed a petition for writ of mandamus in th e above

cause on February 21 , 2012 , seeking relief from an order denying a motion to compel

ap praisal. The Court requested and r eceived a response to the petition for writ o f mandamus from the real party in interest, Abel Zapata . Currently pending before the
Court is relator’s unopposed motion to abate this proce e ding on grounds that the parties have reached a preliminary settleme nt in the underlying case. Relator requests that we

1 See T EX

. R. A PP . P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.”); T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opi nions and memorandum opinions).2

abate this proc e eding for sixty days to allow adequate time for the settlement to be
finalized.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the motion to abate, is of the opinion that the matter sh ould instead be dismissed without prejudice to relator’s right to
refile the petition for writ of mandamus if necessary. If the settlement is not concluded and relator seeks to refile the petition for writ of mandamus, the Court will allow the
matter to b e resubmitted to the Court on the pleadings already filed in this cause and will not assess filing fees for those pleadings

. Accordingly, relator’s motion to abate is
DENIED and t he petitio n for writ of mandamus is DISMISSED without prejudice

. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a). Pending motions, if any, are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed th e 7th day of August , 2012

.
#### Muriel Siebert & Co., Inc., Appellant, v Intuit Inc., Respondent.

Submitted January 2, 2007;

decided January 9, 2007

Motion by New York State Trial Lawyers Association for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted. Three copies of the brief may be served and an original and 24 copies filed within seven days.