alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.1 -**  **Certification
      of Principal Executive Officer**




**CERTIFICATION
      IN ACCORDANCE WITH**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED BY**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Internet America, Inc.
      (the “Company”) for the six months ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William
      E. Ladin, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify in accordance
      with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, to my knowledge that:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





/s/
                William E. Ladin, Jr.William
                E. (Billy) Ladin, Jr.Chief
                Executive OfficerDate:
                February 14, 2008
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert R. Copenhaver, Appellant.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Weinstein and Spatt, JJ., concur.
IB 

Union Calendar No. 178 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1992 

[Report No. 114–236] 

To reduce temporarily the royalty required to be paid for sodium produced 

on Federal lands, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 23, 2015 

Mr. COOK (for himself, Mrs. LUMMIS, Mr. HIMES, Mr. BROOKS of Alabama, 

Ms. BONAMICI, Mr. VALADAO, Mr. SCHRADER, and Mrs. MIMI WALTERS

of California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

JULY 29, 2015 

Additional sponsors: Mr. YODER, Mr. KNIGHT, Mr. WEBER of Texas, and Mr. 

CRAMER

JULY 29, 2015 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 1992 RH

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the royalty required to be paid for 

sodium produced on Federal lands, and for other purposes. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•HR 1992 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Soda Ash 

5 Competitiveness Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REDUCTION IN ROYALTY RATE ON SODA ASH. 

7 Notwithstanding section 102(a)(9) of the Federal 

8 Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 

9 1701(a)(9)), section 24 of the Mineral Leasing Act (30 

10 U.S.C. 262), and the terms of any lease under that Act, 

11 the royalty rate on the quantity or gross value of the out12 put of sodium compounds and related products at the 

13 point of shipment to market from Federal land in the 5- 

14 year period beginning on the date of enactment of this 

15 Act shall be 2 percent. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

Union Calendar No. 178 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1992 

[Report No. 114–236] 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the royalty required to be 

for other purposes. paid for sodium produced on Federal lands, and 

JULY 29, 2015 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Research Program Support: Ames, IA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Ames, Iowa National Animal Disease Center Research Program Support People & Locations







Gary  Hendrick
                        Research Program Support

                        




                        
                        Engineering Equipment Operator
                        Phone: (515) 357-7442
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
NRCS 406 - COLD SPRINGS CAMPLatitude: 42.533Longitude: -122.177Elevation: None

NRCS 406 - Cold Springs Camp

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Billie Creek Divide Site Page...



Billie Creek Divide

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Cold Springs Camp Site Page...



Cold Springs Camp

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Fourmile Lake Site Page...



Fourmile Lake
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS'



To the Board of Directors
Prolong International Corporation


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration 
Statement on Form S-8 (333-41567) of our report dated February 23, 1996 related 
to the consolidated financial statements of Prolong International Corporation 
for the year ended December 31, 1995 included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K 
of Prolong International Corporation.



                                  /s/ Corbin & Wertz

                                  CORBIN & WERTZ



Irvine, California
March 20, 1998
#### People *ex rel.*Reis *v.*French *et al.,*Police Commissioners.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.*

June 6, 1890.)

Municipal Corporations—Removal of Policeman.

Relator, a policeman, was charged with being so drunk as to he unfit for duty. His captain testified that he could not walk straight, smelt very much of liquor, *861and was unfit for duty, but could talk very well. Three of the sergeants testified that relator was unfit for patrol duty. Relator’s denial as to his condition was only very slightly corroborated. *Held,*that the evidence created a question of fact for the police commissioners, and that their action in dismissing relator from the force would not be disturbed.

*Certiorari*to review the action of the police commissioners of the city of New York in dismissing relator, Charles T. Eeis, from the police force.

Argued before Van Brunt, P. J., and Brady and Daniels, JJ.

*John M. Tierney,*for relator. *John J. I) el any,*for respondents.

Daniels, J.,

The charge upon which the relator was tried and removed was that he was so much under the influence of intoxicating liquor in the first precinct station-house as to be unfit to perform police duty, and that this was his condition at the expiration of his tour of patrol duty on the 18th of January, 1889. The charge was denied by him, and in support of the charge Capt. McLaughlin testified that the officer could not walk straight, and smelt very much of liquor, but still he could talk very well. This was at the time he was entitled to leave the station-house, and he added that the officer was then unfit for duty. Sergeant Hatton gave substantially the same description of the officer, and added that this was his condition when he came in from patrol duty. Sergeant Doherty was not quite as pronounced in his conclusion, but by his evidence still confirmed the fact that the officer was so much influenced by liquor as to be incapable of overtaking a person who should endeavor to escape from his efforts to capture him. Sergeant Halpin was about as confident as the witnesses first examined, as to the officer’s condition, and he added that the latter stated he had taken a drink on account of a person brought in by him, which he thought to be a case of cholera. But in his judgment the officer was unfit for patrol duty, by reason of being under the influence of liquor. The evidence of the surgeon was more favorable to the accused, but his inspection and examination of him was nearly an hour later in the afternoon. The officer denied being in this condition, and also the statement mentioned by Sergeant Halpin, and testified that the person brought in by him was a sick sailor. Patrolman Newton stated that he saw the officer about 20 minutes after 12, when he gave no indication of having been drinking. The further evidence was very slight, and not materially affecting the case. It is quite plain that the evidence created a question of fact for the commissioners to decide. It was sufficient to support the view adopted by them. And upon the whole case there seems to be but one alternative, and that is to affirm their decision. All concur.
<PAGE>
                                                                  Exhibit 3.1.5


         CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                         OF R&G FINANCIAL CORPORATION

         FIRST: That at a telephonic meeting of the Board of Directors of R&G
FINANCIAL CORPORATION, a corporation organized pursuant to the laws of the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (the "Corporation"), duly called and held on
February 10, 2004, a resolution was adopted setting forth a proposed amendment
to the first two sentences of Article Four of the Certificate of Incorporation
of the Corporation, to read as follows:

                  The total number of shares of all classes which the
         Corporation shall have the authority to issue is TWO HUNDRED TWENTY
         MILLION (220,000,000) shares, consisting of EIGHTY MILLION
         (80,000,000) shares of Class A Common Stock, par value $.01 per share
         (hereinafter called the "Class A Common Stock"), ONE HUNDRED TWENTY
         MILLION (120,000,000) shares of Class B Common Stock, par value $.01
         per share (hereinafter called the "Class B Common Stock") and TWENTY
         MILLION (20,000,000) shares of Preferred Stock, par value $.01 per
         share (hereinafter called the "Preferred Stock"). As used herein, the
         term "Common Stock" shall include Class A Common Stock and Class B
         Common Stock.

         SECOND: That the foregoing amendment was duly present for stockholder
approval at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Corporation, held on
April 23, 2004, at which meeting all of the shares of Class A Common Stock of
the Corporation, as well as the required majority of the shares of Class B
Common Stock of the Corporation, were voted in favor of said amendment, and
said amendment was thus duly approved pursuant to the provisions of the
Certificate of Incorporation and of Article 8.02 of the General Corporation Law
of 1995.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I, Enrique Umpierre-Suarez, Secretary of the Board
of Directors of the Corporation, being a duly authorized officer of the
Corporation, hereby swear that the facts herein stated are true, this 20th day
of January, 2005.


                          /s/ ENRIQUE UMPIERRE-SUAREZ
                      -----------------------------------
                            Enrique Umpierre-Suarez
                                   Secretary
Lees Ferry Trout Fishery

STATUS AND TRENDS

DownstreamTrout 2000

PRELIMINARY INFO

Technical Work Group

March 2001

Bill Persons, Dave Speas, Ted McKinney, Scott Rogers

Arizona Game and Fish Department
Lees Ferry Trout: SCORE report

• CPUE (Catch/minute electrofishing)

• Kn (Relative Condition) = Wr (Relative 

Weight)

• Growth

• PSD (Proportional Stock Density)

• Natural Recruitment
Lees Ferry CPUE Electrofishing
Lees Ferry Condition Factor (Kn)
0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

May-90 Sep-91 Jan-93 Jun-94 Oct-95 Mar-97 Jul-98 Dec-99 Apr-01

Date

PSD

Lees Ferry PSD
Lees Ferry length frequency 1990
Lees Ferry length frequency 1998
Hatchery fish growth
Angler Use
Angler catch per hour
Natural Recruitment (Modeled)

Lee's Ferry Rainbow Trout recruitment

0

100000

200000

300000

400000

19651970197519801985199019952000

Year

Age 1 recruits

Wild recruits

Hatchery recruits
Preliminary Results

Downriver Sampling

2000

• Sampling focused on rainbow and brown trout

• Depletion estimates

• Catch per effort (CPE) index sampling
RBT CPE downriver 2000 by mile

30 60 90 120 150 180 210

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

rbtcpe

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

WWW

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

WW

WW

W

W

W

W

W

WW

W

W

WWW

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W W

W

W

WWW

W

WW

W

W W

W

W

WW

WWW

W

W

W

WW

W

W

W

W

WWWW WWWW WWWW
BNT CPE downriver 2000 by mile

30 60 90 120 150 180 210

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

bntcpe

WWW

W

WW W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

WWW

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

WW

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

WW

WW

W

W

W

W

W

W

WWWWWW

W

WW

W

W W

W

W

W

W

WWW WW

W

WWWW
CRP CPE downriver 2000 by mile

30 60 90 120 150 180 210

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

crpcpe

WWWWWW WW WWWWW WWW

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

WWWW

WW

WW

W

WW

WW

WW

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

WW

W

W

W

W

W

W W

W

W

W

W

WWW

W

W

W

WW

W

WW

W
Downriver BNT Length frequency 2000

Length Interval

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60

SPECIES: BNT

800

600

400

200

0

Std. Dev = 8.38 

Mean = 26

N = 1316.00
Downriver RBT Length frequency 2000

Length Interval

43

40

38

35

33

30

28

25

23

20

18

15

13

10

8

5

SPECIES: RBT

1400

1200

1000

800

600

400

200

0

Std. Dev = 6.82 

Mean = 28

N = 4653.00
Lees Ferry RBT length frequency 12/00

Length Interval

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

400

300

200

100

0
IN THE OREGON DISTRICT COURT 

MEDFORD DIVISION 

CARRIE DEHART, an individual 

Plaintiff 

v. 

VITAMIN COTT AGE NATURAL 

FOOD MARKETS, INC., 

NATURAL GROCERS BY VITAMIN 

Case No.1:15-cv-2404 

Stipulated ORDER 

COTTAGE, and SCOTT FOREST, an individual 

Defendants 

The undersigned Plaintiff and Defendants in the above referenced case 

hereby move the court to dismiss the case as to all Defendants and all claims pied, 

with prejudice, without costs or attorney's fees to any party. 

Thomas Dimitre, Attorney at Law LLC 

By: /s/ Thomas Dimitre 

Thomas Dimitre 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

Carrie DeHart 

Jackson Lewis P.C. 

By: /s/ April Upchurch Fredrickson 

April Upchurch Fredrickson 

Attorney for Defendant 

Vitamin Cottage Natural Food 

Markets, Inc. and Natural Grocers 

By Vitamin Cottage 

1 
By: /s/ Jennifer Nelson 

Jennifer Nelson 

Attorney for Defendant 

Scot Forrest 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this ---'-i ___ day of May, 2017. 

Dated: January 13, 2017 

2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Samuels, Appellant.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mangano, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.
RIO HONDO AT ROSWELL, NMLatitude: 33.372Longitude: -104.546Elevation: 3620

RIO HONDO AT ROSWELL, NM

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Sierra Blanca Site Page...



Sierra Blanca
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alfred Long, Appellant.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from denial of his motion to suppress evidence which he claims was obtained as a result of an unlawful arrest without a warrant in the apartment where he was staying. The People contend that the arrest was proper as the police entered with the consent of Katherine Pecori, in whose apartment defendant was staying. Testimony at the suppression hearing reveals that, when approached in the hallway by a police officer inquiring about defendant, Pecori *1017advised that defendant was in the apartment, having just arrived. She admitted the officer into the apartment and told defendant that the officer was looking for him. The officer then transported defendant to the scene of a hit-and-run accident where he was identified by a witness and physical evidence was discovered on his person.

A warrantless arrest in a suspect’s home or a place in which he has a reasonable expectation of privacy is prohibited absent exigent circumstances or consent *(Payton v New York,*445 US 573, 588; *People v Levan,*62 NY2d 139, 143-144). Since concededly there were no exigent circumstances, the arrest of defendant was lawful only if there was consent to the police entry. Whether consent is given voluntarily or is the product of police coercion, express or implied, is a question of fact to be determined from the totality of the circumstances *(Schneckloth v Bustamonte,*412 US 218, 227). Here there were no threats or coercive behavior by the police and Pecori’s cooperation with the police investigation is evidence of voluntary consent *(see, People v Gonzalez,*39 NY2d 122, 129; *People v Abrams,*95 AD2d 155). Although there were no specific words of consent, Pecori’s consent could be inferred from her conduct, i.e., her words, deeds and gestures in admitting the police officer into her apartment *(see, People v Whitehurst, 25*NY2d 389, 392; *People v Abrams, supra).*Inasmuch as the police obtained consent to enter the apartment without a warrant, defendant’s motion to suppress was properly denied. (Appeal from judgment of Jefferson County Court, Van Auser, J. — criminal possession of stolen property, first degree, and other offenses.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT


TO 18 UNITED STATES C. §1350


(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Novavax, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A Amendment No. 1 for the fiscal period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stanley C. Erck, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:




1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the dates and periods covered by this Report.





By:
/s/ Stanley C. ErckPresident and Chief Executive Officer


Date: November 4, 2011
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-17-00281-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF H.B. AND H.B., CHILDREN

From the 361st District Court

Brazos County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16-001947-CV-361

ABATEMENT ORDER

The appellant’s brief is overdue in this appeal. 

We abate this appeal to the trial court to conduct any necessary hearings within 14 

days of the date of this Order pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(b)(2) 

and (3). TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3).

The supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records required by Texas Rule of 

Appellate Procedure 38.8(b)(2) and (3), if any, are ordered to be filed within 21 days of 

the date of this Order. See id.

PER CURIAM
In the Interest of H.B. and H.B., Children Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeal abated

Order issued and filed November 15, 2017
Bug Flows Monitoring Results

Ted Kennedy

15 April 2020

Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center

Southwest Biological Science Center

U.S. Department of the Interior

U.S. Geological Survey
Design of Bug Flows

 Give bugs the “weekends off”

 Stable, low flows on weekends, May-August

 Eggs laid on weekends won’t dry/die

“Bug Flows” tested at Glen Canyon Dam 

May-August of 2018 & 2019!!

https://www.gcmrc.gov/discharge_qw_sediment/station/GCDAMP/09380000
Insect Response Equivocal

2018-Huge Increase!

2019-Back to earth 

Unpublished data, subject to 

change, do not cite.
But Caddisflies Emerged Later?

 2018: early

 2019: late

Midges 3.5 months 

later in 2019!

1.5 months

Unpublished data, subject to 

change, do not cite.
Conceptual Model

Credit: K. Dibble, USGS

Credit: B. Deemer, USGS

2018 and 2019

were very different

Unpublished data, subject to 

change, do not cite.
Growing conditions  phenology 

If growing conditions good

 Emergence early

 Body size large

 Lots of emergence

Lytle, David A. "Flash floods and aquatic insect life‐history evolution: 

evaluation of multiple models." Ecology 83.2 (2002): 370-385.
Temperature ≠ phenology

Water temp 

poor 

predictor of 

insect growth

Peak emergence

Unpublished data, subject to Spring water temperature (cumulative °C)

change, do not cite.
Prediction

 Midge emergence peaks 

...early June 2020

 Caddisfly emergence peaks 

...mid July 2020

Unpublished data, subject to 

change, do not cite.
Suspended sediment  Phenology

Growing conditions in 

2019 were bad:

 10X more mud than 2018

Peak emergence

Cumulative “Mud” in Spring (mg/L) 

(Silt + Clay, March 1-May1, RM166 gage, National Canyon) Unpublished data, subject to 

change, do not cite.
Monitoring 2020 Bug Flows

No river trips until May 22

 Statistical power still high w/ delayed start

 AND would still observe 

 early-June midge peak

 mid-July caddisfly peak 

In discussion w/ NPS about new 

Unpublished data,

subject to change, do not cite. sampling at Lees Ferry and Phantom
But what if there is no monitoring in 

2020?

 Unable to detect ‘short-term’ effects of 2020 Bug Flows

 Unable to detect ‘long-term’ effects of 2019 Bug Flows

Short-term (instantaneous) Long-term (whole life cycle) 

2019

2020

2020

2020

2020

2020

Image credit: 

http://www.ces.ncsu.edu/depts/ent/notes/Urban/images/midge-lc.jpg Unpublished data, subject to change, do not cite.
Questions?