alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                   5

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-03-1999
<CASH>                                         327,828
<SECURITIES>                                   224,903
<RECEIVABLES>                                  164,009
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     72,915
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               804,476
<PP&E>                                      16,119,155
<DEPRECIATION>                                 206,156
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,477,701
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,782,501
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,094
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,602,468
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,477,701
<SALES>                                      1,359,875
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,359,875
<CGS>                                          609,821
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,375,843
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,230
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             226,394
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (602,559)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (226,742)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (375,817)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                311,848
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (63,969)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.074)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.074)


</TABLE>
Review of the 2017 Annual Reporting 

and Discussion of Knowledge Asse

January 26, 2017
ARM

• Change dates to avoid conflicts (Jan. 30‐31 and Feb. 1, 20

• Were science questions from the TWP answered?

• Were topics fully addressed?

• Rainbow trout webinar suggestion

• Was the presentation format (i.e., sequence of elements) 

• What improvements would you suggest for next year?

• Organize by LTEMP resource topic (conforms to ROD)• Knowledge Assessment results incorporated
Knowledge Assessment

• Objectives

• To summarize what is known

• To assess ongoing needs for monitoring to sustain crucial knowl• To identify critical gaps and weaknesses in this knowledge that r

attention

• Desired Outcomes

• A set of simple tables that:

• Are easily understood by stakeholders• Inform work planning and budgeting

• A standard assessment process that can be repeated with minim
An example of

what it might

look like
An example of what it might look like
Team Leads

Topic Western Science Lead(s) Tribal Leads

Aquatic food base Ted Kennedy

Archaeological and cultural Jan Balsom and Theresa Pasqual

resourcesHumpback chub Charles Yackulic

Hydropower and energy Craig Ellsworth

Invasive fish speciesOther native fish species

Dave Rogowski

Brian Healy

Charle

Kerry C

Melinda A

Rainbow trout fishery Mike Yard MikRecreational experience Lucas Bair Kurt D

Riparian vegetation Emily Palmquist

Sediment Paul Grams

Water quality David Topping (below the Dam)

and Robert Radtke (Lake Powell)

2016

03/

TWG Meeting 01/26/2017 

KA tables due to David Bra02/15/2017

Roll up tables availabfrom David02/22/2017

AMWG Meeting Fin02/15/2017 ava

TWG notified that KA started and

opportunity for involvement

12/06/2016

Extention notice01/11/2017

TWG Meeting ‐ KA concept

discussed and accepted

10/18/2016

KA kick‐off11/16/2016

Today

Oct Nov Dec 2017 Feb Mar 

10/18/2016 ‐ 11/16/2016 KA guidance document developed

KA tables to be completed 11/16/2016 ‐ 2/15/2017TWG and others to review and revise tables and prepare final document 2/22/2BAHG to refine budget guidance and make recommendation to TWGCalendar TWG webinar to roll out KA results
EXHIBIT 32

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C., ss.1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of SINO-American
Development Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and President, and the
Treasurer and principal financial officer of the Company, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of SINO-American
Development Corporation.

Dated: August 30, 2006

                                          /a/ Fang Zhong
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Fang Zhong
                                          Chief Executive Officer and President
                                          and Chief Financial Officer
#### Quinn *v.*McDonald.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.*

July 18, 1890.)

Appeal from special term, Westchester county.

Action by Ellen M. Quinn against Annie McDonald to foreclose a mortgage assigned to plaintiff. Plaintiff appeals from an order of reference.

Argued before Barnard, P. J., and Pratt, J. .

*Pascal T. Southern,*for appellant. *Benner & Benner,*for respondent.,

Barnard, P. J.

The issue in this action is the same in every respect as in the preceding action, *(Quinn*v. *McDonald, ante,*855,) and the order granting a reference ■ should be reversed for the same reasons as are given in the foregoing opinion.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TYREE TUCKER,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 93 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 1st day of August, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
#### Teague Belliard et al., Appellants, v Leader Limousine Corp. et al., Respondents.

[942 NYS2d 591]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kangs County (Bayne, J.), dated May 17, 2010, which granted the motions of the defendants Leader Limousine Corp. and Manuel A. Duran, and the separ rate motions of the defendants Barry M. Cohen and Jaime Vega, Jr., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the ground that neither plaintiff sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof granting those branches of the motion of the defendants Leader Limousine Corp. and Manuel A. Duran, and the separate motion of the defendants Barry M. Cohen and Jaime Vega, Jr., which were for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted by the plaintiff Teague Belliard, and substituting therefor a provision denying those branches of the separate motions; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In opposition to the defendants’ prima facie showing that neither of the plaintiffs sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345 [2002]; *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]), the plaintiff Teague Belliard raised a triable issue of fact as to whether he *932sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) *(see Perl v Meher,*18 NY3d 208 [2011]; *Johnson v Cristino,*91 AD3d 604, 605 [2012]; *Young Chool Yoo v Rui Dong Wang,*88 AD3d 991 [2011]). However, the plaintiff Alberto Sepulveda failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether he sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident *(see Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court erred in determining that the defendants were entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted by Belliard against them, but properly determined that the defendants were entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted by Sepulveda against them. Angiolillo, J.P., Dickerson, Belen and Hall, JJ., concur.
#### COLBY, Appellant, v. NATIONAL BROADWAY BANK et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

December 11, 1896.)

Action by Bainbridge Colby, as receiver, against the National Broadway Bank and others.

M. H. Regensburger, for appellant.

R. B. Kelly, for respondents.

No opinion. Order modified by reducing the amount of security to be given by the plaintiff: to the sum of $250, as required by section 3272 of the Code, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 97-30262

Summary Calendar

____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus

ARTHUR F. CALTON,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

(96-CR-30038)

 

September 22, 1997

Before SMITH, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Arthur F. Calton appeals his sentence for possession of child

pornography. He contends that the district court incorrectly

applied U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2, the guideline applicable to trafficking

in child pornography; that it erroneously believed it could not

depart downward from the guideline sentencing range; and that such

a departure was appropriate.

The district court’s factual finding that Calton was involved
in trafficking in child pornography was not clearly erroneous.

United States v. Fair, 979 F.2d 1037, 1040 (5th Cir. 1992). The

trafficking guideline thus was applied properly to Calton. U.S.S.G.

§ 2G2.4(c)(2). 

The district court’s comments regarding downward departure

indicate that the court knew it could depart downward but chose not

to do so. We lack jurisdiction to consider Calton’s downwarddeparture contention on its merits. United States v. DiMarco, 46

F.3d 476, 478 (5th Cir. 1995).

AFFIRMED IN PART; APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

WINSTON SHROUT, 

Defendant. 

PORTLAND DIVISION 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

3: 15-cr-00438-JO 

ORDER 

· This matter is before the comt .to address two pending motions. The court construes 

defendant's 1\!!otion to ClarifY and Request for Hearing of Necessity [#38] as a motion to recuse 

based on earlier rulings adverse to defendant. That motion is DENIED. 

Defendant's J'vlotion/Request for Identity Hearing and Production of Rule 5(C)(3) Identity 

Affidavit of Necessity [#39} has no merit and presents no basis upon which defendant could be 

entitled to relief. Accordingly, that motion is also DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this q-f-day of May, 2016. 

ORDER 

Case 3:15-cr-00438-JO Document 41 Filed 05/09/16 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 173 (Friday, September 10, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 50715]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19602]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK


Sunshine Act Meetings

    Notice of an Open Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Export-
Import Bank of the United States.

TIME AND DATE:  Thursday, September 16, 2020 at 9:30 a.m.

PLACE:  The meeting will be held via teleconference.

STATUS:  The meeting will be open to public observation for Item 
Numbers 1 and 2.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
    1. Appointment of EXIM Advisory Committee for 2021-22.
    2. Appointment of EXIM Sub-Saharan Africa Advisory Committee for 
2021-22.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Joyce B. Stone, (202-257-4086). 
Members of the public who wish to attend the meeting via teleconference 
should register via using the link below:

Register Here

    By noon Wednesday, September 15, 2021. Individuals will be directed 
to a Webinar registration page and provided call-in information.

Joyce B. Stone,
Assistant Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-19602 Filed 9-8-21; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v George Blajeski, Respondent.

— Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Di Tucci, J.), dated August 6, 1985, which granted the defendant’s motion to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law and the facts, the motion to suppress is denied, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings.

On March 5, 1985, at approximately 5:00 a.m., while on duty in a radio motor patrol car in Queens County, New York City Police Officer Paul Heider observed a vehicle occupied by the defendant and two other males stopped at the curb with its motor running. Heider characterized this area as a "drug-prone location”. After observing the vehicle for about 10 minutes, Heider approached the vehicle and asked the defendant why he was stopped at that location and to produce identification. Heider observed that the defendant’s eyes were bloodshot, his speech was slurred and his breath smelled of alcohol. On the basis of his observations, Heider arrested the defendant for driving while intoxicated. A search of the defendant’s person conducted following his arrest produced a quantity of cocaine and diazepam, a prescription drug.

Upon the defendant’s motion, the Supreme Court granted suppression of the physical evidence. It found that Heider lacked a reasonable suspicion to believe that the defendant was engaged in criminal activity.

Since the defendant’s vehicle was already stopped, Officer Heider needed only an articulable reason to warrant the brief inquiry which he made of the defendant *(see, People v Harrison,*57 NY2d 470, 475; *People v De Bour,*40 NY2d 210). A police officer may approach a private citizen on the street "when there is some objective credible reason for that interference not necessarily indicative of criminality” *(People v De Bour, supra,*at p 223).

Heider’s observations of the defendant’s bloodshot eyes, *583slurred speech and the odor of alcohol on his breath *(see, People v Farrell,*89 AD2d 987), while the motor was running *(see, People v Marriott,*37 AD2d 868), gave him probable cause to arrest the defendant for a violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192. The evidence seized incident to that arrest should not be suppressed *(see, People v Troiano,*35 NY2d 476). Bracken, J. P., Niehoff, Eiber and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

May 30, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
130398 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STAT E OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 130398 COA: 257313 Monroe CC: 03-033284-FC DITAINIA ADAMS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to a ppeal the December 1, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

l0522 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 30, 2006

Clerk
#### In the Matter of Pritpal Kainth, Appellant, v Inder Kainth, Respondent.

Submitted April 2, 2007;

decided June 7, 2007

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed for failure to demonstrate timeliness as required by section 500.22 (b) (2) of the Rules of Practice of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.22 [b] [2]).
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 170 (Tuesday, September 7, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 50134]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19216]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2021-N-0944]


Pediatric Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting; Establishment of 
a Public Docket; Request for Comments; Correction

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a notice 
entitled ``Pediatric Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting; 
Establishment of a Public Docket; Request for Comments.'' The document 
announced a meeting of the Pediatric Advisory Committee. The document 
was published with the incorrect docket number and end time of the 
meeting. This document corrects those errors.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marieann Brill, Office of the 
Commissioner, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., 
Bldg. 32, Rm. 5154, Silver Spring, MD 20993, 240-402-3838, or FDA 
Advisory Committee Information Line, 1-800-741-8138 (301-443-0572 in 
the Washington, DC area). Please call the Information Line for up-to-
date information on this meeting.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of Tuesday, August 
10, 2021, in FR Doc. 2021-16984 (86 FR 43666), the following 
corrections are made.
    1. On page 43666, in the first column, in the header of the 
document, and in the third column under ``Instructions,'' ``Docket No. 
FDA-2020-N-1648N'' is changed to ``Docket No. FDA-2021-N-0944''.
    2. On page 43666, in the first column, the DATES portion of the 
document is changed to: ``The meeting will be held on September 17, 
2021, from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. Eastern Time.''
    This notice is issued under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 
U.S.C. app. 2) and 21 CFR part 14, relating to the advisory committees.

    Dated: August 31, 2021.
Lauren K. Roth,
Acting Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-19216 Filed 9-3-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
734 A.2d 388

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Delroy Anthony BAILEY, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued Sept. 17, 1998.

Decided July 21, 1999.

Bruce F. McKenrick, Ebensburg, for Delroy Anthony Bailey, appellant.

David Tulowitzki, Ebensburg, Christian A. Fisanick, Barnesboro, for the Com., appellee.

Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN and SAYLOR, JJ.

*435
      *ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 21st day of July, 1999, the Order of the Superior Court dated July 16, 1997 is reversed pursuant to *Commonwealth v. Shaffer,*557 Pa. 453, 734 A.2d 840 (1999).

Justice CASTILLE files a Concurring Statement.

CASTILLE, Justice,

concurring.

I concur in the decision reversing the Superior Court based on my concurring opinion in *Commonwealth v. Shaffer,*557 Pa. 453, 734 A.2d 840 (1999).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
September 30, 1996 Financial Statements included in Form 10-Q and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             175
<SECURITIES>                                       631
<RECEIVABLES>                                      827
<ALLOWANCES>                                       118
<INVENTORY>                                         97
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,736
<PP&E>                                           5,380
<DEPRECIATION>                                     771
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,167
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,350
<BONDS>                                          4,164
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,896
<OTHER-SE>                                         151
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,167
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,805
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,278
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (9)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    38
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 171
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    365
<INCOME-TAX>                                       153
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                183
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       183
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.54
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

               CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
                 FINANCIAL OFFICER OF US GLOBAL NANOSPACE, INC.
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section.1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002  (subsection (a) and
(b) of Section  1350,  Chapter 63 of Title 18,  United  States Code) each of the
undersigned  officers of US Global  Nanospace,  Inc. (the "Company") does hereby
certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

(a) The  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 of
the Company fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(b) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b) Information  contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                             Dated:  September 21, 2006


                                             /s/ Carl Gruenler
                                             -----------------------
                                             Carl Gruenler,
                                             Chief Executive Officer


                                             /s/ Kevin Cronin
                                             -----------------------
                                             Kevin Cronin,
                                             Chief Financial Officer