alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2010252EN.01021701.xml

| 25.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 252/217 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 252/217

---

DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

of 5 May 2010

on the closure of the accounts of the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union for the financial year 2008

(2010/549/EU)

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,

having regard to the final annual accounts of the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union for the financial year 2008,

having regard to the Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States for the financial year 2008, together with the Agency’s replies (1),

having regard to the Council’s recommendation of 16 February 2010 (5827/2010 — C7-0061/2010),

having regard to Article 276 of the EC Treaty and Article 319 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (2), and in particular Article 185 thereof,

having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2007/2004 of 26 October 2004 establishing a European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union (3), and in particular Article 30 thereof,

having regard to Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 of 19 November 2002 on the framework Financial Regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 185 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 (4), and in particular Article 94 thereof,

having regard to Rule 77 of, and Annex VI to, its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinion of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A7-0085/2010),

| 1. | Approves the closure of the accounts of the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union for the financial year 2008; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward this Decision to the Executive Director of the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union, the Council, the Commission and the Court of Auditors, and to arrange for its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union (L series). |
| --- | --- |

2.

The President

Jerzy BUZEK

The Secretary-General

Klaus WELLE

---

(1)  
  OJ C 304, 15.12.2009, p. 38.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 349, 25.11.2004, p. 1.

3

(4)  
  OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p. 72.

4

---
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
Exhibit 21.1 Wilsons The Leather Experts Inc. (Minnesota corporation)Wilsons Center, Inc. (Minnesota corporation)Rosedale Wilsons, Inc. (Minnesota corporation)River Hills Wilsons, Inc. (Minnesota corporation)Wilsons Leather Direct Inc. (Delaware corporation)Wilsons Leather of Alabama Inc. (Alabama corporation)Wilsons Leather of Arkansas Inc. (Arkansas corporation)Wilsons Leather of Connecticut Inc. (Connecticut corporation)Wilsons Leather of Delaware Inc. (Delaware corporation)Wilsons Leather of Airports Inc. (Delaware corporation)Chicago O’Hare Leather Concessions Joint VentureAirport Leather Concessions LLC (Delaware LLC)Houston Airport Leather Concessions LLC (Delaware LLC)Wilsons Leather of Florida Inc. (Florida corporation)Wilsons Leather of Georgia Inc. (Georgia corporation)Wilsons Leather of Indiana Inc. (Indiana corporation)Wilsons Leather of Iowa Inc. (Iowa corporation)Wilsons Leather of Louisiana Inc. (Louisiana corporation)Wilsons Leather of Maryland Inc. (Maryland corporation)Wilsons Leather of Massachusetts Inc. (Massachusetts corporation)Wilsons Leather of Michigan Inc. (Michigan corporation)Wilsons Leather of Mississippi Inc. (Mississippi corporation)Wilsons Leather of Missouri Inc. (Missouri corporation)Wilsons Leather of New Jersey Inc. (New Jersey corporation)Wilsons Leather of New York Inc. (New York corporation)Wilsons Leather of North Carolina Inc. (North Carolina corporation)Wilsons Leather of Ohio Inc. (Ohio corporation)Wilsons Leather of Pennsylvania Inc. (Pennsylvania corporation)Wilsons Leather of Rhode Island Inc. (Rhode Island corporation)Wilsons Leather of South Carolina Inc. (South Carolina corporation)Wilsons Leather of Tennessee Inc. (Tennessee corporation)Wilsons Leather of Texas Inc. (Texas corporation)Wilsons Leather of Vermont Inc. (Vermont corporation)Wilsons Leather of Virginia Inc. (Virginia corporation)Wilsons Leather of West Virginia Inc. (West Virginia corporation)Wilsons Leather of Wisconsin Inc. (Wisconsin corporation)Bermans The Leather Experts Inc. (Delaware corporation)Wilsons Leather Holdings Inc. (Minnesota corporation)USA Wilsons Leather Holdings Inc. Qingdao RO (China Representative Office)Wilsons International Inc. (Minnesota corporation)Wilsons Leather of Canada Ltd. (Minnesota corporation)Wilsons Leather of Hong Kong Ltd. (Hong Kong company)Wilsons (UK) Limited (United Kingdom company)WWT, Inc. (Delaware corporation)Florida Luggage Corp. (Puerto Rico corporation)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6307

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ANTHONY L. OLVIS, a/k/a Tony,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CR-95-38, CA-99-48-4)

Submitted: August 30, 2000 Decided: September 7, 2000

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony L. Olvis, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Bradenham, II,

Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on

February 7, 2000, the district court’s records show that it was

entered on the docket sheet on February 8, 2000. Pursuant to Rules

58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the

date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as

the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v.

Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony L. Olvis seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See United States v. Olvis, Nos. CR-95-38; CA99-48-4 (E.D. Va. Feb. 8, 2000).* We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNITED STATES
                   SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                            Washington, D.C.

                                FORM 8-KA

                             CURRENT REPORT
                 Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
                     Securities Exchange Act of 1934

                              May 29, 1996
                    (Date of earliest event reported)

                           HELP AT HOME, INC.
         (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

DELAWARE                      33-97034                36-4044986
(State of other          (Commission File No.)     (IRS Employer
jurisdiction of                                     Identifica-
incorporation)                                      tion Number)

223 West Jackson, Suuite 500
Chicago, IL                                                60606
(Address of principal executive offices)               (Zip Code)

(312)663-4244
(Telephone Number including Area Code)
<PAGE>
              Changes in Registrant s Certifying Accountant
                                (Item 4)

                                Exhibit 1

Following is the entire body of the letter received from Richard A.
Eisner & Company, LLP dated as of June 5, 1996 relative to the change in
accountants:

                                        June 5, 1996

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   Re: Help at Home, Inc.
                                       File Ref No. 33-97034

We were previously the principal auditors for Help at Home, Inc.; under
the date of October 25, 1995 (November 16, 1995 with respect to Note
h[2]), we reported on the financial statements of Help at Home, Inc. as
at June 30, 1995 and for the year then ended.  On May 29, 1996 our
engagement was terminated.  We have read Help at Home, Inc. s statements
included under Item 4 of a draft of its 8-K and we agree with such
statements, except that all references to our firm name should be
Richard A. Eisner & Company, LLP.

                             Very truly yours,
                             
                              /s/Richard A. Eisner & Company, LLP
<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF FIRST INDUSTRIAL SECURITIES, L.P. FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             707
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      165
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (100)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   772
<PP&E>                                          81,420
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,598)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  76,962
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              710
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      75,556
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    76,962
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,730
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    (848)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (473)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,409
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,409
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,409
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit** **32.1**

 

**ANTARES PHARMA, INC.**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

 

The undersigned, Jack E. Stover, the Chief Executive Officer of Antares Pharma, Inc. (the “Company”), has executed this Certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”).

 

The undersigned hereby certifies that:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certification as of the 27th day of March, 2007.

 

|   |   |   |   | /s/ Jack E. Stover                                    |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |   | Jack E. Stover

President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   |   |   |                                                  |
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Hines, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Santagata, J.), rendered November 2, 1984, convicting him of assault in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mangano, J. P., Brown, Lawrence, Weinstein and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit _____________

No. 23-40511

consolidated with

No. 23-40512

_____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Mario Alberto Reyes-Martinez

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeals from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC Nos. 7:23-CR-622-1, 

7:23-CR-818-1

______________________________

Before King, Haynes, and Graves, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Mario Alberto 

Reyes-Martinez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Reyes-Martinez has not filed a 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 21, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-40511 Document: 45-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/21/2024
No. 23-40511

c/w No. 23-40512

2

response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the 

appeals present no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, 

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused 

from further responsibilities herein, and the appeals are DISMISSED. See

5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 23-40511 Document: 45-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/21/2024
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-5570-LA, 333-43899 and 333-50385 on Form S-3, Form S-8 and Form S-3,
respectively, of our report dated March 27, 1997, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Bristol Retail Solutions, Inc. as of
December 31, 1996, and for the period from inception (April 3, 1996) to December
31, 1996 included in its Annual Report (Form 10-KSB/A) for the year ended
December 31, 1997 as amended on April 16, 1998, June 10, 1998 and on August 5,
1998.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
----------------------------------------------
Orange County, California
August 5, 1998
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

 DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

LEVERT STEWART,

Appellant,

v.

Case No. 5D23-1027 

LT Case No. 2008-CF-007205-A 

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Decision filed May 9, 2023

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Duval County,

Tatiana Salvador, Judge.

Levert Stewart, Raiford, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LAMBERT, C.J., HARRIS and KILBANE, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF DECORATIVE HOME ACCENTS, INC. FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED MARCH 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             621
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,770
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,697
<INVENTORY>                                     39,033
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                68,441
<PP&E>                                          41,075
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (9,922)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 120,217
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          159,866
<BONDS>                                        118,100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           53,554
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                   (127,043)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   120,217
<SALES>                                         37,629
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,269
<CGS>                                           29,224
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   29,224
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,555
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (5,225)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,979)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,979)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,979)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Presidential Documents

50831 

Federal Register 

Vol. 86, No. 173 

Friday, September 10, 2021 

Title 3— 

The President 

Presidential Determination No. 2021–12 of September 7, 2021 

Continuation of the Exercise of Certain Authorities Under the 

Trading With the Enemy Act 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State [and] the Secretary of the Treasury 

Under section 101(b) of Public Law 95–223 (91 Stat. 1625; 50 U.S.C. 4305 

note), and a previous determination on September 9, 2020 (85 FR 57075, 

September 14, 2020), the exercise of certain authorities under the Trading 

With the Enemy Act is scheduled to expire on September 14, 2021. 

I hereby determine that the continuation of the exercise of those authorities 

with respect to Cuba for 1 year is in the national interest of the United 

States. 

Therefore, consistent with the authority vested in me by section 101(b) 

of Public Law 95–223, I continue for 1 year, until September 14, 2022, 

the exercise of those authorities with respect to Cuba, as implemented by 

the Cuban Assets Control Regulations, 31 CFR part 515. 

The Secretary of the Treasury is authorized and directed to publish this 

determination in the Federal Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, September 7, 2021 

[FR Doc. 2021–19747 

Filed 9–9–21; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 4811–33–P 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with MEMO_FRBIDEN.EPS</GPH>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carl Anderson, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lakritz, J.), rendered February 22, 1983, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered. The facts have been considered and have been determined to have been established.

On appeal, the defendant, who proceeded *pro se*at trial, contends that the trial court failed to adequately advise him of the perils of self-representation, thereby mandating a new trial. We agree and accordingly reverse.

*581"Regardless of his lack of expertise and the rashness of his choice, defendant could choose to waive counsel if he did so knowingly and voluntarily” *(People v Vivenzio,*62 NY2d 775, 776). Implicit in a decision to defend *pro se*is a concomitant decision to disavow the constitutional right to counsel. For the election to waive counsel to be effective, assuming it was timely, the court must insure that it was made competently, intelligently and voluntarily and that the defendant was aware of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation before being allowed to proceed *(People v Smith,*68 NY2d 737, *cert denied*— US —, 93 L Ed 2d 392; *People v McIntyre,*36 NY2d 10, 17). In order to ascertain this, the trial court should undertake a sufficiently searching inquiry to assure itself that the dangers and disadvantages attendant upon forfeiture of the fundamental right to counsel are appreciated by the defendant *(People v Kaltenbach,*60 NY2d 797, 798-799; *People v Sawyer,*57 NY2d 12, 21 *rearg dismissed*57 NY2d 776, *cert denied*459 US 1178).

The record before us is devoid of any warning by the trial court with respect to the hazards of self-representation. Such failure to inform is not subject to harmless error analysis *(see, People v Bonds,*99 AD2d 759). Accordingly, a new trial is mandated.

We have considered the defendant’s other contention and find it to be without merit. Mollen, P. J., Brown, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.