alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2009270EN.01000101.xml

| 15.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 270/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 270/1

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 956/2009

of 14 October 2009

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in particular Article 138(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 15 October 2009.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 14 October 2009.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.

2

---

ANNEX

Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

| (EUR/100 kg) |
| --- |
| CN code | Third country code (1) | Standard import value |
| 0702 00 00 | MA | 69,8 |
| MK | 24,5 |
| TR | 64,0 |
| ZZ | 52,8 |
| 0707 00 05 | TR | 133,3 |
| ZZ | 133,3 |
| 0709 90 70 | TR | 112,6 |
| ZZ | 112,6 |
| 0805 50 10 | AR | 90,1 |
| CL | 83,5 |
| TR | 79,0 |
| US | 79,7 |
| UY | 55,5 |
| ZA | 66,8 |
| ZZ | 75,8 |
| 0806 10 10 | BR | 216,3 |
| TR | 118,0 |
| US | 186,7 |
| ZZ | 173,7 |
| 0808 10 80 | AU | 175,3 |
| CL | 86,9 |
| CN | 78,6 |
| NZ | 71,3 |
| ZA | 71,4 |
| ZZ | 96,7 |
| 0808 20 50 | CN | 58,3 |
| TR | 92,6 |
| ZA | 89,8 |
| ZZ | 80,2 |

(EUR/100 kg)

CN code

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

0702 00 00

MA

69,8

MK

24,5

TR

64,0

ZZ

52,8

0707 00 05

TR

133,3

ZZ

133,3

0709 90 70

TR

112,6

ZZ

112,6

0805 50 10

AR

90,1

CL

83,5

TR

79,0

US

79,7

UY

55,5

ZA

66,8

ZZ

75,8

0806 10 10

BR

216,3

TR

118,0

US

186,7

ZZ

173,7

0808 10 80

AU

175,3

CL

86,9

CN

78,6

NZ

71,3

ZA

71,4

ZZ

96,7

0808 20 50

CN

58,3

TR

92,6

ZA

89,8

ZZ

80,2

---

(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
  ZZ
  ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

---
DOLORES RIVER AT DOLORES, COLORADOLatitude: 37.472Longitude: -108.498Elevation: 6949

DOLORES RIVER AT DOLORES, COLORADO

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Sharkstooth Site Page...



Sharkstooth

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Black Mesa Site Page...



Black Mesa

Courtesy NRCS - Go to El Diente Peak Site Page...



El Diente Peak

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Lizard Head Pass Site Page...



Lizard Head Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Scotch Creek Site Page...



Scotch Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Columbus Basin Site Page...



Columbus Basin
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kurtis A. Brown, Appellant.

Memorandum: Defendant’s contentions lack merit. There was no unnecessary delay in arraignment and the evidence at the suppression hearing fully supports the court’s determination that defendant’s statement was voluntarily given. The trial court properly denied defendant’s motion to sever his trial from that of his two codefendants since the statements of all three defendants were interlocking. The exception to the *Bruton*rule for interlocking confessions applies, even though defendant repudiated his confession *(see, People v Cruz,*66 NY2d 61, 72). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Bergin, J. — murder, second degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Lawton and Schnepp, JJ.
# L_2009278EN.01002301.xml

| 23.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 278/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 278/23

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 998/2009

of 22 October 2009

granting no export refund for butter in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 619/2008

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1), and in particular Article 164(2), in conjunction with Article 4, thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 619/2008 of 27 June 2008 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds concerning certain milk products (2) provides for a permanent tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 619/2008 of 27 June 2008 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds concerning certain milk products (2) provides for a permanent tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 6 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1454/2007 of 10 December 2007 laying down common rules for establishing a tender procedure for fixing export refunds for certain agricultural products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate not to grant any refund for the tendering period ending on 20 October 2009. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 6 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1454/2007 of 10 December 2007 laying down common rules for establishing a tender procedure for fixing export refunds for certain agricultural products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate not to grant any refund for the tendering period ending on 20 October 2009.

| (3) | The Management Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its Chair, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Management Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its Chair,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the standing invitation to tender opened by Regulation (EC) No 619/2008, for the tendering period ending on 20 October 2009, no export refund shall be granted for the products and destinations referred to in points (a) and (b) of Article 1 and in Article 2 of that Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 23 October 2009.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 October 2009.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 168, 28.6.2008, p. 20.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 325, 11.12.2007, p. 69.

3

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Communications & Power Industries,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 4, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, O. Joe Caldarelli, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ O. Joe Caldarelli


O. Joe Caldarelli
Chief Executive Officer
August 8, 2003
#### In the Matter of Kimberly Carolyn J. and Another, Children Alleged to be Permanently Neglected. Towanna Edna J., Appellant; Cardinal McCloskey Services for Children, Respondent.

Submitted March 19, 2007;

decided May 3, 2007

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that dismissed the appeal from the dispositional orders entered upon default, dismissed upon the ground that no appeal lies from an Appellate Division order dismissing an appeal from an order entered upon default *(see*CPLR 5511); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed Family Court’s denial of the motion to vacate, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.

*969Chief Judge Kaye taking no part.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                                     Wilsons

Wilsons The Leather Experts Inc.
     Wilsons Center, Inc.
          Rosedale Wilsons, Inc.
               Wilsons Leather Direct Inc.
          River Hills Wilsons, Inc.
               Wilsons Leather of Alabama Inc.
               Wilsons Leather of Arkansas Inc.
               Wilsons Leather of Connecticut Inc.
               Wilsons Leather of Delaware Inc.
                    Wilsons Leather of Airports Inc.
                         Chicago O'Hare Leather Concessions Joint Venture
                    Houston Airport Leather Concessions L.L.C.
               Wilsons Leather of Florida Inc.
               Wilsons Leather of Georgia Inc.
               Wilsons Leather of Indiana Inc.
               Wilsons Leather of Iowa Inc.
               Wilsons Leather of Louisiana Inc.
               Wilsons Leather of Maryland Inc.
               Wilsons Leather of Massachusetts Inc.
               Wilsons Leather of Michigan Inc.
               Wilsons Leather of Mississippi Inc.
               Wilsons Leather of Missouri Inc.
               Wilsons Leather of New Jersey Inc.
               Wilsons Leather of New York Inc.
               Wilsons Leather of North Carolina Inc.
               Wilsons Leather of Ohio Inc.
               Wilsons Leather of Pennsylvania Inc.
               Wilsons Leather of Rhode Island Inc.
               Wilsons Leather of South Carolina Inc.
               Wilsons Leather of Tennessee Inc.
               Wilsons Leather of Texas Inc.
               Wilsons Leather of Vermont Inc.
               Wilsons Leather of Virginia Inc.
               Wilsons Leather of West Virginia Inc.
               Wilsons Leather of Wisconsin Inc.
               Bermans the Leather Experts Inc.
               Wilsons Leather Holdings Inc.
               Wilsons International Inc.
                    Wilsons Leather of Canada Ltd.
                    Wilsons Leather of Hong Kong Ltd.
               Wilsons (UK) Limited
                    Wilsons Leather Gatsland Limited
                    Wilsons Leather Gatsair Limited
#### Fitzgerald Giscombe et al., Respondents, v Flatbush General Hospital, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the *667defendant Flatbush General Hospital appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Shaw, J.), dated November 21, 1985, as, upon renewal and reargument, adhered to its prior determination in an order dated January 16, 1985, vacating a default judgment entered against the plaintiffs, reinstated the action, and directed the appellant to accept the plaintiffs’ bill of particulars.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiffs’ proffered excuse for failing to appear on the motion for summary judgment based upon their alleged failure to serve a bill of particulars in compliance with a consent order was that their attorney moved to a new office and did not receive the motion papers addressed to her at her former office. The reasonableness of the excuse proffered and whether the plaintiffs made an adequate showing that their claim has legal merit are issues left to the sound discretion of the court of first instance. At bar, Special Term conducted a hearing at which the attorney for the plaintiffs testified concerning the reasons for the alleged default. The adequacy of the plaintiffs’ excuse rested upon an issue of credibility which was primarily for the hearing court, which had the benefit of hearing and seeing the witness, to resolve. Special Term resolved the issue in favor of the plaintiffs and we decline to disturb its findings. Furthermore, the plaintiffs have adequately made out the merits of their claim. Upon our review of the record, we perceive no abuse of discretion in Special Term’s vacatur of the default judgment. Accordingly, we affirm.

We have considered the parties’ remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Weinstein, Rubin and Harwood, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
The viaLink Company:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(No.333-55912) on Form S-3 and (No. 333-41320) on Form S-8 of The viaLink
Company of our report dated February 8, 2001 relating to the consolidated
balance sheets of The viaLink Company as of December 31, 1999 and 2000, and the
related statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), stockholders'
equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended, which report appears
in the December 31, 2000 annual report on Form 10-KSB of The viaLink Company.

KPMG LLP


Dallas, Texas
April 27, 2001
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                 5

<S>                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>             3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                    MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                              114,474
<SECURITIES>                                          1,414
<RECEIVABLES>                                       859,680
<ALLOWANCES>                                         51,678
<INVENTORY>                                          17,035
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1,180,823
<PP&E>                                           10,012,300
<DEPRECIATION>                                    5,161,446
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    7,570,287
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2,924,310
<BONDS>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                             32,933
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                        3,879,535
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      7,570,287
<SALES>                                             212,416
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  4,202,813
<CGS>                                               149,589
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       149,589
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  3,991,023
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    (11,136)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   69,475
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      19,233
<INCOME-TAX>                                          5,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  13,833
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                         13,833
<EPS-BASIC>                                             .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           .00



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 210 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 210

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt student workers 
 for purposes of determining a higher education institution's employer 
                   health care shared responsibility.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 8, 2015

 Mr. Meadows (for himself, Mrs. Brooks of Indiana, Mr. Rodney Davis of 
 Illinois, Mr. Duncan of South Carolina, Mrs. Ellmers, Mr. Hanna, Mr. 
 Jones, Mr. Murphy of Florida, Mr. Ribble, Mr. Rokita, Mr. Roskam, and 
 Mr. Turner) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt student workers 
 for purposes of determining a higher education institution's employer 
                   health care shared responsibility.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Student Worker Exemption Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. STUDENT WORKERS EXEMPTED FROM DETERMINATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION 
              INSTITUTION'S EMPLOYER HEALTH CARE SHARED RESPONSIBILITY.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (c) of section 4980H of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by redesignating paragraphs (5), (6), 
and (7) as paragraphs (6), (7), and (8), respectively, and by inserting 
after paragraph (4) the following new paragraph:
            ``(5) Exception for student workers.--
                    ``(A) In general.--Services rendered as a student 
                worker to an eligible educational institution (as 
                defined in section 25A(f)(2)) shall not be taken into 
                account under this section as service provided by an 
                employee.
                    ``(B) Student worker.--For purposes of this 
                paragraph, the term `student worker' means, with 
                respect to any eligible educational institution (as so 
                defined), any individual who--
                            ``(i) is employed by such institution, and
                            ``(ii) is a student enrolled at the 
                        institution and is carrying a full-time 
                        academic workload, as determined by the 
                        institution, under a standard applicable to all 
                        students enrolled in a particular educational 
                        program.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to months beginning after December 31, 2014.
                                 <all>
```
James S. Coon 

OSB#: 771450 

THOMAS, COON, NEWTON & FROST 

The Thomas Mann Building 

820 SW 2nd Avenue, Suite 200 

Portland, Oregon 97204 

Phone: (503) 228-5222 

Fax: (503) 273-9175 

E-mail: jcoon@tcnf.legal 

Scott A. Sell 

OSB#: 144297 

THOMAS, COON, NEWTON & FROST 

The Thomas Mann Building 

820 SW 2nd Avenue, Suite 200 

Portland, Oregon 97204 

Phone: (503) 228-5222 

Fax: (503) 273-9175 

E-mail: ssell@tcnf.legal 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

LARRY A. RENFROE, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY 

ADMINISTRATION, 

Defendant. 

Case No.: 2:15-cv-2219-JE 

ORDER GRANTING 

STIPULATED MOTION FOR 

ATTORNEY FEES UNDER 

28 U.S.C. § 2412 

Based on the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that attorney fees 

in the amount of $4,734.03 will be awarded to Plaintiff in care of his attorneys pursuant 

to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, payable after the satisfaction of 
Plaintiffs debts, if any, under Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010), and mailed to his 

attorney, Scott A. Sell, at Mr. Sell's address: 820 SW 2nd Ave Ste 200, Portland OR, 

97204. There are no costs or expenses. 

I ~tk 

Dated this ~day of December, 2017. 

Presented by: 

Scott A. Sell 

Thomas, Coon, Newton & Frost 

Of Attorneys for Plaintiff 

James S. Coon 

Thomas, Coon, Newton & Frost 

Of Attorneys for Plaintiff
#### PEOPLE v. NATIONAL MUT. INS. CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July, 1896.)

Proceeding against the National Mutual Insurance Company.

No opinion. Motion to dismiss appeal granted, unless the appellant Anthony print and serve his appeal papers in time to notice the appeal for the October term. See 38 N. Y. Supp. 1147.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         715,446
<SECURITIES>                                   684,327
<RECEIVABLES>                                  165,958
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,841
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,160,384
<PP&E>                                       2,261,818
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,541,908
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,597,046
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,110,467
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,827
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,483,752
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,597,046
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,230,628
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,709,318
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             161,355
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,699,078
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,049,440
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   649,638
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21
        

</TABLE>