alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Total Identity Corp. (the "Company") on
      Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Matthew P. Dwyer, CEO and CFO of
      the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS.
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








September
                13, 2006
            
            
            By:/s/ Matthew P. DwyerMatthew
                P. Dwyer, CEO, CFO, President, principal executive officer and principal
                financial and accounting officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Taxpayer Communications Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. This meeting will still be held via teleconference.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, October 12, 2021.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Conchata Holloway at 1-888-912-1227 or 214-413-6550.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Communications Project Committee will be held Tuesday, October 12, 2021, at 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be made with Conchata Holloway. For more information please contact Conchata Holloway at 1-888-912-1227 or 214-413-6550, or write TAP Office, 1114 Commerce Street, Mail Code 1005DAL, Dallas, Texas 75242 or contact us at the website: *http://www.improveirs.org.* The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: September 3, 2021.

Kevin Brown,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2021-19505 Filed 9-9-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
# C_2009095EN.01000101.xml

| 24.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5494 — ENEL/Endesa)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 95/01

On 7 April 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5494. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5494. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Computed Inflow Volume                    
csv

#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Computed Inflow Volume                    
json
EXHIBIT 15.1

                   AWARENESS LETTER OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

                                                    Re: OYO Geospace Corporation
                                                    Registration on Form S-8

We are aware that our report dated July 27, 1998, on our review of interim
financial information of OYO Geospace Corporation as of and for the three months
and nine months ended June 30, 1998 and 1997, and included in the Company's
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter then ended is incorporated by
reference in the Company's registration statement on Form S-8 (333-40893).
Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, this report should not
be considered a part of the registration statement prepared or certified by us
within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

                                                  /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Houston, Texas
July 27, 1998
[J-97-2020] 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

MICHAEL CROSSEY, DWAYNE THOMAS, 

IRVIN WEINREICH, BRENDA WEINREICH, 

AND THE PENNSYLVANIA ALLIANCE 

FOR RETIRED AMERICANS,

Petitioners

v.

KATHY BOOCKVAR, SECRETARY OF 

THE COMMONWEALTH, AND JESSICA 

MATHIS, DIRECTOR OF THE BUREAU OF 

ELECTION SERVICES AND NOTARIES,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 108 MM 2020

SUBMITTED: September 8, 2020

CONCURRING AND DISSENTING STATEMENT

CHIEF JUSTICE SAYLOR DECIDED: September 17, 2020

I would not dismiss the Petitioner’s request for extension of the deadline for receipt 

of mail-in ballots as moot. Instead, I would have employed this case as the vehicle to 

decide that issue on the evidentiary record developed before President Judge Leavitt in 

accordance with this Court’s assignment, and I would have resolved the matter based on 

the rationale set forth by Justice Donohue in her concurring and dissenting opinion in 

Pennsylvania Democratic Party v. Boockvar, 133 MM 2020. 

In all other respects, I join the per curiam Order.

Justices Donohue and Mundy join this concurring and dissenting statement.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 173 (Friday, September 10, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50720-50721]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19533]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Board of Scientific 
Counselors, NIDA.
    The meeting will be closed to the public as indicated below in 
accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(6), Title 
5 U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of 
individual intramural programs and projects conducted by the NATIONAL 
INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE, including consideration of personnel 
qualifications and performance, and the competence of individual 
investigators, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Board of Scientific Counselors, NIDA.
    Date: October 26, 2021.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate personnel qualifications and 
performance, and competence of individual investigators.
    Place: National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, Biomedical 
Research Center, 251 Bayview Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21224 (Virtual 
Meeting).
    Contact Person: Deon M. Harvey, Ph.D., Management Analyst, 
Office of the Scientific Director, National Institute on Drug Abuse, 
251 Bayview Boulevard, Room 04A314, Baltimore, MD 21224, (443) 740-
2466, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ddb9b8b2b3f3b5bcafabb8a49db3b4b5f3bab2ab"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0662636968286e677470637f46686f6e28616970">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.277, Drug 
Abuse Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, Scientist 
Development Awards, and Research Scientist Awards; 93.278, Drug 
Abuse National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 
93.279, Drug Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)


[[Page 50721]]


    Dated: September 3, 2021.
Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-19533 Filed 9-9-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
NRCS 483 - FOURMILE LAKELatitude: 42.439Longitude: -122.229Elevation: None

NRCS 483 - Fourmile Lake

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Billie Creek Divide Site Page...



Billie Creek Divide

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Cold Springs Camp Site Page...



Cold Springs Camp

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Fourmile Lake Site Page...



Fourmile Lake
while standing in West's front yard. Meanwhile, Eddie's girlfriend heard 

the commotion, climbed out of the back of a truck in the driveway, and 

grabbed a bat. This occurred after Esquivel displayed the firearm. When 

Eddie saw the gun, he told West and his girlfriend, "he's got a gun, he's got 

a gun" and threw a chair at Esquivel. Esquivel dodged the chair and shot 

Eddie in the back as he ran toward the front door of West's home. When 

Esquivel tried to fire a second shot his gun jammed and he fled. 

We conclude that a rational juror could infer from these 

circumstances that Esquivel was the original aggressor, see NRS 

200.120(2)(a), did not have a right to be present at the location where he 

used deadly force, see NRS 200.120(2)(b), and was actively engaged in 

conduct in furtherance of criminal activity, see NRS 200.120(2)(c); NRS 

207.200(1) (unlawful trespass), when he shot the victim. Therefore, he 

had the duty to retreat before using deadly force in order for his homicide 

to be justifiable. See NRS 200.120; see also Harkins v. State, 122 Nev. 974, 

990, 143 P.3d 706, 716 (2006) ("Self-defense is not available to an original 

aggressor."). No evidence was presented that Esquivel attempted to 

retreat before he shot the victim in the back, and a rational juror could 

conclude from these circumstances that Esquivel committed second-degree 

murder. See NRS 200.010(1); NRS 200.030(2). The jury's verdict will not 

be disturbed on appeal where, as here, substantial evidence supports the 

conviction. Bolden v. State, 97 Nev. 71, 73, 624 P.2d 20, 20 (1981); see also 

Hernandez v. State, 118 Nev. 513, 531, 50 P.3d 1100, 1112 (2002) 

("[C]ircumstantial evidence alone may support a conviction."); McNair, 

108 Nev. at 56, 825 P.2d at 573 ("Mt is the jury's function, not that of the 

2 
court, to assess the weight of the evidence and determine the credibility of 

witnesses."). Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. 

Hardesty 

cc: Hon. Valerie Adair, District Judge 

Sandra L. Stewart 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A < 

3
RIO GRANDE AT ISLETA LAKES NR ISLETA, NMLatitude: 34.947Longitude: -106.68Elevation: 4900

RIO GRANDE AT ISLETA LAKES NR ISLETA, NM

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Ute Creek Site Page...



Ute Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Vacas Locas Site Page...



Vacas Locas

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Grayback Site Page...



Grayback

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Tres Ritos Site Page...



Tres Ritos

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Taos Powderhorn Site Page...



Taos Powderhorn

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Shuree Site Page...



Shuree

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Palo Site Page...



Palo

Courtesy NRCS - Go to San Antonio Sink Site Page...



San Antonio Sink

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Garita Peak Site Page...



Garita Peak

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Wager Gulch Site Page...



Wager Gulch

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Rio Santa Barbara Site Page...



Rio Santa Barbara

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Taos Pueblo Site Page...



Taos Pueblo

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Alcalde Site Page...



Alcalde

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Bateman Site Page...



Bateman

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Beartown Site Page...



Beartown

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Chamita Site Page...



Chamita

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Culebra #2 Site Page...



Culebra #2

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Cumbres Trestle Site Page...



Cumbres Trestle

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Gallegos Peak Site Page...



Gallegos Peak

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Hopewell Site Page...



Hopewell

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Lily Pond Site Page...



Lily Pond

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Middle Creek Site Page...



Middle Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to North Costilla Site Page...



North Costilla

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Quemazon Site Page...



Quemazon

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Red River Pass #2 Site Page...



Red River Pass #2

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Senorita Divide #2 Site Page...



Senorita Divide #2

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Trinchera Site Page...



Trinchera

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Upper Rio Grande Site Page...



Upper Rio Grande

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Upper San Juan Site Page...



Upper San Juan

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Whiskey Ck Site Page...



Whiskey Ck

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Wolf Creek Summit Site Page...



Wolf Creek Summit

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Elk Cabin Site Page...



Elk Cabin

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Santa Fe Site Page...



Santa Fe
Exhibit 99(.2) Certification Pursuant to
               Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by
                  Calvin E. Jenness, Chief Financial Officer




          In connection with the Quarterly Report of Blount International,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Calvin E. Jenness, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     the Company.




/s/ Calvin E. Jenness
Calvin E. Jenness
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
November 14, 2002
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-1140

RENE RAMSEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THE VILLA JOINT RETIREMENT CONVENT, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-98-1481-WMN) Submitted: June 17, 1999 Decided: June 24, 1999 Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rene Ramsey, Appellant Pro Se. Saul E. Gilstein, Latonya B. Dargan, GALLAGHER, EVELIUS & JONES, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Rene Ramsey appeals the district court’s order granting the Appellee’s motion for summary judgment and denying his motion for summary judgment in his Title VII action claiming discrimination based upon his race and gender. We have reviewed the record andthe district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Ramsey v. The Villa Joint Retirement Convent, Inc. , No. CA-98-1481-WMN (D. Md. Jan. 12, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10
- 18
- 00 152
- CR
MICHAEL SCOTT CHASTA IN , Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

From the 220 th District Court Bosque County, Texas Trial Court No. CR15457

ORDER
Appellant’s brief was originally due on or before October 18 , 2018. When no brief

was filed on that date , the Court notified appellant by letter dated October 25 , 2018 that
the brief was late and that, unless a brief or satisfactory response was received within
fourteen days, the Court would abate the appeal and order the trial court to immediately
conduct a hearing pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(b)(2) and (3). See
T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). No brief was filed, but on November 27, 2018, a ppellant
filed a m otion for e xtension of t ime to f ile her b rief

.Chastain v. State Page 2

Before we ruled on a ppellant’s motion, the trial court sua sponte held a hearing regarding a ppellant’s failure to timely file a brief. Appellant’s attorney told the trial court
that a ppellant’s brief would be filed on November 30, 2018. The trial court directed that
a copy of the reporter’s record from that proceeding be filed with this Court. Appellant’s brief was not filed on November 30, 2018.
We thereafter granted a ppellant’s m otion for e xtension of t ime and directed that

a ppellant’s brief be filed no later than Januar y 3, 2019. Appellant was also warned that no further extensions would be entertained absent extraordinary circumstances. Appellant has now filed an additional m otion to e xtend t ime to f ile appellant’ s brief until January 13, 2019.
An extension of time until January 13, 2019 would be a total of 147 days to file the brief. The Rules of Appellate Procedure establish the norm that a brief should be filed in 30 days. Id. at 3 8.6(a). Accordingly, appellant’s motion for an extension of time to file appella nt’s brief is only partially granted . Appellant’s brief is due no later than January 11, 2019 . If appellant’s brief is not filed by January 11 , 2019, we will abate this appeal and order the trial court to immediately conduct a hearing pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2) & (3).
Id

. PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis , and Justice Scoggins Order issued and filed January 2 , 201 9
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DATED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         209,709
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  844,720
<ALLOWANCES>                                    25,229
<INVENTORY>                                  3,378,605
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,549,556
<PP&E>                                       2,785,265
<DEPRECIATION>                                 958,517
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,930,855
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,176,535
<BONDS>                                      1,040,379
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,599
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,444,921
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,930,855
<SALES>                                      2,337,299
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,337,299
<CGS>                                        1,183,937
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,183,937
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,993,953
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              50,313
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (890,904)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (890,904)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (890,904)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.19)
        

</TABLE>
#### Frederick D. Newman et al., Appellants, v New York Post, et al., Respondents.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William McCooe, J.), entered on or about July 9, 1986, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by McCooe, J., without costs or and without disbursements. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Carro, Kassal and Rosenberger, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2571

LESTER D. PERSINGER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Maurice G. Taylor, Jr.,

Magistrate Judge. (CA-97-4)

Submitted: July 28, 1998 Decided: August 24, 1998

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lester D. Persinger, Appellant Pro Se. Anne von Scheven, SOCIAL

SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s order granting the

Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment on Appellant’s complaint

seeking review of the Commissioner’s denial of social security

benefits. We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the magistrate judge. Persinger v. Apfel, Comm’r, No.

CA-97-4 (S.D.W. Va. Oct. 24, 1997). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED