alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2009137EN.01000101.xml

| 3.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 137/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 137/1

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 454/2009

of 2 June 2009

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in particular Article 138(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 3 June 2009.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 2 June 2009.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.

2

---

ANNEX

Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

| (EUR/100 kg) |
| --- |
| CN code | Third country code (1) | Standard import value |
| 0702 00 00 | IL | 69,6 |
| MA | 79,2 |
| MK | 47,9 |
| TR | 53,3 |
| ZZ | 62,5 |
| 0707 00 05 | JO | 151,2 |
| MK | 23,0 |
| TR | 105,4 |
| ZZ | 93,2 |
| 0709 90 70 | JO | 216,7 |
| TR | 117,5 |
| ZZ | 167,1 |
| 0805 50 10 | AR | 49,5 |
| TR | 53,1 |
| ZA | 46,7 |
| ZZ | 49,8 |
| 0808 10 80 | AR | 77,3 |
| BR | 74,4 |
| CL | 79,6 |
| CN | 91,5 |
| NZ | 106,5 |
| US | 103,9 |
| UY | 71,7 |
| ZA | 84,1 |
| ZZ | 86,1 |
| 0809 10 00 | TR | 108,0 |
| ZZ | 108,0 |
| 0809 20 95 | US | 272,9 |
| ZZ | 272,9 |

(EUR/100 kg)

CN code

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

0702 00 00

IL

69,6

MA

79,2

MK

47,9

TR

53,3

ZZ

62,5

0707 00 05

JO

151,2

MK

23,0

TR

105,4

ZZ

93,2

0709 90 70

JO

216,7

TR

117,5

ZZ

167,1

0805 50 10

AR

49,5

TR

53,1

ZA

46,7

ZZ

49,8

0808 10 80

AR

77,3

BR

74,4

CL

79,6

CN

91,5

NZ

106,5

US

103,9

UY

71,7

ZA

84,1

ZZ

86,1

0809 10 00

TR

108,0

ZZ

108,0

0809 20 95

US

272,9

ZZ

272,9

---

(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
  ZZ
  ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

---
#### HUTCHINSON v. HEALEY.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 15, 1897.)

Action by Susanna Hutchinson against John Healey.

No opinion. Motion granted, with $10 costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001016177
<NAME> DURA AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          23,697
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  491,319
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (12,777)
<INVENTORY>                                    136,562
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               793,505
<PP&E>                                         581,321
<DEPRECIATION>                                (80,427)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,444,867
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          630,556
<BONDS>                                        401,560
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           174
<OTHER-SE>                                     430,822
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,444,867
<SALES>                                      2,200,385
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,200,385
<CGS>                                        1,854,705
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,854,705
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               174,801
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              76,703
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 94,176
<INCOME-TAX>                                    37,984
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             49,769
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (5,402)
<CHANGES>                                      (3,147)
<NET-INCOME>                                    41,220
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.46


</TABLE>
#### POWELL’S CASE. John M. Powell *v.*The United States.

*On the Proofs.*

This suit, in which *Messrs. Bartley & Casey*appeared for the claimant, and *Mr. Aleas. Johnston*(with whom was the *281
      *Assistant Attorney-General)*for tbe defendants, being for part of the same capture, was heard with the preceding case.

Judgment for the net proceeds of 9-J bales of cotton, amounting to $1,994.77.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William McKethan, Appellant.

[946 NYS2d 501]

— Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated March 25, 1996 *(People v Mc-Kethan,*225 AD2d 800 [1996]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered June 15, 1993.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Mastro, A.P.J., Rivera, Skelos and Dillon, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of L Q Corporation, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Melvyn
Brunt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

      Date: April 2, 2007                          /s/Melvyn Brunt
                                                   -----------------------
                                                   Melvyn Brunt
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
BAXTER TISDALE

, Appellant,

v.

JULIE L. JONES, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

, Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THE REOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 1894

_____________________________/

Opinion filed December 4, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Liberty County

. Martin A. Fitzpatrick , Judge

. Baxter Tisdale, pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS

, C.J, BENTON and KELSEY

, J J

. , CONCUR.
Glen Canyon National Recreation Area

2023 Monitoring and Rapid Response Plans
Pre- and Post- HFE Electrofishing

Objective - to determine current distribution and densities of SMB and GSF in 

upper reaches of Glen Canyon before and after an HFE. 

• 4-5 nights

• 2 electrofishing boats 

(2 boatmen, two netters)

• upper 3-miles of the river 
Netting

• 4 mainstem regions (approximately 5.2 miles each)

• 250 m sections

• Each region sampled every 2 weeks (4 large fyke nets; 4 small fyke nets; 10 baited 

hoop nets, limited gill nets?)

• 1 backwater region 

• (Lower Slough @ -12 mile)

• Sampled every 2 week 

(4 large fyke nets; 4 small fyke)

Lower 

Slough
Snorkel Surveys

Conduct snorkel surveys in areas of suitable SMB spawning habitat using maps provided by 

USGS. Snorkel surveys will begin when river water temperatures increase to 14oC and above. 

Slough temperatures will be downloaded weekly

Map provided by USGS

Drew Eppehimer
Electrofishing

• Boat electrofishing 

• nonnative fish hotspots(Once every two week, ~ 14 sites)

• Lower slough once each week

• high SMB density areas as identified

last fall by our rapid response efforts. 

• increase sampling with warmer 

water temperatures
Rapid Response

• Electrofishing - GLCA and GRCA is working on a Task Agreement/Contract for boatmen (and possibly field assistance) to 

assist with a 8-16 week electrofishing Rapid Response (September/October)

• Will look at a boat electrofishing 

Rapid Response effort of entire Glen 

Canyon Reach

• Chemical Treatment- Purchase of Supplies

• Targeted backwater areas

For example – Lower and Upper Slough

Lower 

Slough
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MARCH 13, 2014

NO. 03-13-00655-CV

M. U., N. T., and E. T., Appellants

v.

The Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND ROSE

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

This is an appeal from the termination decree signed by the district court on September 12, 2013. 

Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no 

reversible error in the district court’s termination decree. Therefore, the Court affirms the district

court’s termination decree. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no 

adjudication of costs is made.
~	1	~	

May	9,	2014	Hydrology	Summary	

Snow water equivalent (SWE) as of May 8, 2014, for the Upper Green River and Yampa/White River

Basins are 149 and 105 percent of median, respectively.  Flaming Gorge SWE is similar to 1996 and

Deerlodge SWE is similar to 1998 as shown in Figures 1 and 2 below.  The May final forecast April‐July

unregulated inflow volume for Flaming Gorge Reservoir is 1,320 kaf and the Yampa River at Deerlodge is

1,550 kaf.   

The unregulated inflow volumes for Flaming Gorge Reservoir were lower than the previous April

midmonth forecast of 1,400 kaf.  The May final forecast moved into the average (above median)

hydrologic classification.  The Yampa River at Maybell May final forecast remained unchanged in the

moderately wet hydrologic classification.   

Revised Flaming Gorge operations exist in response to the decreased May final forecast.  Flaming Gorge

releases 14 days of power plant capacity or 4,600 cfs.  Flaming Gorge releases maintain 13 days at 4,600

cfs and 17 days > 4,600 cfs and <=8,600 cfs, including bypass ramp up and down.  Base flow releases are

maintained at 1,725 cfs beginning after the spring peak rampdown through the estimated EOM May

spring releases in 2015.    If Reclamation receives a request from the USFWS for increased releases of

+40% greater than the average base flow of 1,725 cfs, Flaming Gorge releases would remain at 2,415 cfs

from the beginning of the base flow season through September 30, 2014.  Releases would decrease at

50 cfs/day beginning October 1, 2014 through October 21 at which time releases would remain at 1,365

cfs through estimated EOM May 2015 beginning of spring runoff.   

FIGURE 1—Flaming Gorge May final forecast related to ROD percent exceedances
~	2	~	

FIGURE 2—Flaming Gorge historic unregulated inflow ranking with May final forecast of April‐July

unregulated inflow

FIGURE 3—Yampa at Deerlodge May final forecast related to ROD percent exceedances
~	3	~	

FIGURE 4—Flaming Gorge historic unregulated inflow ranking with May final forecast of April‐July

unregulated inflow
~	4	~	

FIGURE 1—Upper Green River Basin Snotel Tracking.  1981‐2010 percent of median compared against 2014 YTD

Snow Water Equivalent (SWE) and 1996 percent of average SWE

FIGURE 5‐ Upper Yampa River Basin Snotel Tracking. 1981‐2010 percent of median compared against 2013 YTD

Snow Water Equivalent (SWE) and 2008 percent of average SWE  

FIGURE 6—Yampa River at Deerlodge Chances of Exceeding River Levels as of May 6, 2014
~	5	~	

FIGURE 7—Yampa River at Deerlodge One Week Chances of Exceeding River Levels as of May 6, 2014

FIGURE 8—Flaming Gorge release and Yampa and Jensen flows for WY1998.  Shaded grey area indicates larval

presence.  
~	6	~	

FIGURE 9—Flaming Gorge release and Yampa and Jensen flows for WY1996.  Shaded grey area indicates larval

presence.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2001 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2001

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the conditions under 
     which certain persons may be treated as adjudicated mentally 
                   incompetent for certain purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 23, 2015

  Mr. Miller of Florida (for himself and Mr. Conaway) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the conditions under 
     which certain persons may be treated as adjudicated mentally 
                   incompetent for certain purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans 2nd Amendment Protection 
Act''.

SEC. 2. CONDITIONS FOR TREATMENT OF CERTAIN PERSONS AS ADJUDICATED 
              MENTALLY INCOMPETENT FOR CERTAIN PURPOSES.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 55 of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 5511. Conditions for treatment of certain persons as adjudicated 
              mentally incompetent for certain purposes
    ``In any case arising out of the administration by the Secretary of 
laws and benefits under this title, a person who is mentally 
incapacitated, deemed mentally incompetent, or experiencing an extended 
loss of consciousness shall not be considered adjudicated as a mental 
defective under subsection (d)(4) or (g)(4) of section 922 of title 18 
without the order or finding of a judge, magistrate, or other judicial 
authority of competent jurisdiction that such person is a danger to 
himself or herself or others.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 55 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following 
new item:

``5511. Conditions for treatment of certain persons as adjudicated 
                            mentally incompetent for certain 
                            purposes.''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Asta Funding, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Mitchell Cohen, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company
         as of the dates presented and the consolidated results of operations of
         the Company for the periods presented.

Dated: August 9, 2006


                                                     /s/ Mitchell Cohen
                                                     -------------------
                                                     Mitchell Cohen
                                                     Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Asta Funding, Inc. and will be retained by Asta Funding, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       32
EXHIBIT 99.2



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of

the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Nicholas M. Rosier, Chief Financial Officer of Prolong International
Corporation (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|(1) |  | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated:    April 28, 2003



/s/    NICHOLAS M.
ROSIERNicholas M. Rosier, Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
# L_2009124EN.01006401.xml

| 20.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 124/64 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 124/64

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 18 May 2009

establishing the position to be adopted, on behalf of the Community, within the International Sugar Council as regards the extension of the International Sugar Agreement 1992

(2009/394/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 133 in conjunction with the second subparagraph of Article 300(2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas:

The International Sugar Agreement 1992 was concluded by the Community by Council Decision 92/580/EEC (1) and entered into force on 1 January 1993 for a period of three years until 31 December 1995. Since then, it has been regularly extended for further periods of two years. That Agreement was last extended by decision of the International Sugar Council in May 2007 and remains into force until 31 December 2009. A further extension is in the interest of the Community. The Commission, which represents the Community in the International Sugar Council, should therefore be authorised to vote in favour of such extension,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The Community's position within the International Sugar Council shall be to vote in favour of the extension of the International Sugar Agreement 1992 for a further period up to two years.

The Commission is hereby authorised to express this position within the International Sugar Council.

Done at Brussels, 18 May 2009.

For the Council

The President

J. KOHOUT

---

(1)  
  OJ L 379, 23.12.1992, p. 15.

1

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with thereport of Impac Mortgage Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/Afor the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in thecapacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

 
| (1)    |   | The Report fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                 |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                   |
| (2)    |   | The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the  financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 
| /s/ Joseph R. Tomkinson          |   |
|----------------------------------|--------|
| Joseph R. Tomkinson              |
| Chief Executive Officer          |
| September 17, 2008          |
|                             |
| /s/ Todd R. Taylor               |   |
| Todd R. Taylor                   |
| Interim Chief Financial  Officer |
| September 17, 2008          |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ImpacMortgage Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Impac Mortgage Holdings, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----