alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Simeon A. HUNTLEY, III, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-10338

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

June 29, 2007.

Roberta Josephina Bodnar, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Orlando, FL, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Rosemary T. Cakmis, Donald R. West, Craig L. Crawford, Federal Public Defenders, Orlando, FL, R. Fletcher Peacock, Jacksonville, FL, John L. Badalamenti, Federal Public Defender, Tampa, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

*964Before ANDERSON, BIRCH and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

John L. Badalamenti, appointed counsel for Simeon A. Huntley, III, in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders *v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Huntley’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.3
                                 Duncan Moffat
                             Compensation Agreement

  The Following agreement was adopted by the Board of Directors of Lumisys
          Incorporated pursuant to a Written Consent Dated May 1, 2000

1.  New Base Salary. $160,000, effective 1/1/2000.
    ----------------
2.  1999 Incentive. The Board of Lumisys has agreed to accelerate the vesting
    ---------------
    of options so that the total 37,500 shares subject to the performance-based
    option granted November 1, 1999 to Duncan Moffat will be vested. Moffat will
    be granted 43,750 new options upon approval by the compensation committee of
    the board of directors so that the total number of unvested options granted
    to Moffat will be 75,000 shares. The option will be priced at the closing
    market price of Lumisys common stock on the date of grant. The shares
    granted will vest monthly on a pro-rata basis over 5 years. The base vest
    date for both options will be 3/1/00.
3.  Incentive for sale Lumisys Inc.  The success fee for the sale of the
    -------------------------------
    Lumisys, excluding AuntMinnie.com will be 1% of the net proceeds to Lumisys
    for any transaction up to $50 million and additionally, 2% of any
    incremental net proceeds to Lumisys above $50 million. The incentive will be
    paid in cash as soon as feasible, but not to exceed 30 days from the date
    Lumisys receives proceeds from the transaction.
4.  Incentive for continuation of employment if Lumisys is not sold.  If, by
    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    March 1, 2001, Lumisys has not been sold, Moffat will be paid an amount
    equal to 50% of his current annual salary ($80,000). If a sale of Lumisys
    consummated after March 1, 2001, and Moffat is still an employee of Lumisys,
    the incentive pay for continuation of employment will be deducted from the
    incentive for sale of Lumisys to be paid.
5.  Loan. Under separate agreement, Moffat will be given a loan of $50,000.
    -----
    The loan will bear interest at the lowest rate allowed and will be due and
    payable upon Moffat's receipt of either a success fee for the sale of
    Lumisys or incentive for continuation of employment if Lumisys is not sold.
    The loan is to be secured by Moffat's Lumisys Common Stock, Lumisys Stock
    Options and any receivables owed by the Company to Moffat (including, but
    not limited to final pay and accrued vacation).
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             131,226
<SECURITIES>                                         1,414
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,048,211
<ALLOWANCES>                                        48,803
<INVENTORY>                                          3,518
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,434,279
<PP&E>                                          10,526,309
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,058,307
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,287,554
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,255,992
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            32,933
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,137,720
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,287,554
<SALES>                                            795,811
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,429,902
<CGS>                                              533,207
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      533,207
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,482,420
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   (14,012)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 174,761
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    317,918
<INCOME-TAX>                                        45,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                272,018
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       272,018
<EPS-BASIC>                                            .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .08



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                         CERTIFICATION OF THE PRESIDENT
                         AND THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Antonio Milici, M.D., Ph.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of
GeneThera, Inc. (the "Company"), do hereby certify to the best of my knowledge
and belief that:

      (1) The Company's annual report on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended
December 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: July 31, 2006


By: /s/ Antonio Milici
    ------------------------------------
    Antonio Milici, M.D., Ph.D.,
    President
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

Wednesday, September 1, 2021; 10 a.m.

# PLACE:

This meeting will be conducted by remote means.

# STATUS:

Commission Meeting—Closed to the Public.

# MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED:

Briefing Matter.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Alberta E. Mills, Secretary, Division of the Secretariat, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7479 (Office) or 240-863-8938 (cell).

Dated: August 31, 2021.

Alberta E. Mills,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2021-19164 Filed 9-1-21; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1286

ANGEL DE LEON,

Petitioner,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals.

Submitted: August 25, 2010 Decided: September 3, 2010

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hugo Cesar Castro, Rockville, Maryland, for Petitioner. Tony 

West, Assistant Attorney General, William C. Peachey, Assistant 

Director, Rebecca Hoffberg, Office of Immigration Litigation, 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for 

Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Angel De Leon, a native and citizen of Guatemala,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals (“Board”) dismissing his appeal from the immigration 

judge’s denial of his application for adjustment of status. We 

have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and affirm the 

denial of relief for the reasons stated by the Board. In re: De 

Leon (B.I.A. Feb. 25, 2010); see Ramirez v. Holder, 609 F.3d 

331, 335-37 (4th Cir. 2010) (holding that an alien who is

inadmissible under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(9)(C)(i)(I) (2006) is 

ineligible for adjustment of status pursuant to 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1255(i) (2006)). Accordingly, we deny the petition for 

review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

PETITION DENIED
Long-Term Experimental & Management Plan 

(LTEMP) Biological Opinion – Humpback Chub 

Trigger Review & Current Status Update 

Technical Work Group Meeting

April 14, 2021

Kerri Pedersen

Bureau of Reclamation
Incidental Take Parameters – Tier 1 Action Initiation Triggers

TIER 1 – Early Intervention TRIGGER 2018 2019 2020 3-year 

average

1A. Combined adult (≥200 mm) humpback chub 

(HBC) in the mainstem Little Colorado River (LCR) 

aggregation and LCR

≤ 9,000 15,000 12,000 11,000

OR

1B. Recruitment of sub-adult HBC (150-199 mm) 

does not equal or exceed estimated adult mortality

1) Sub-adult population estimate in LCR in spring* 3-year average 

<1,250 1,800 2,600 1,000 1,800

OR

2) Sub-adult abundance in mainstem in 

Juvenile Chub Monitoring (JCM) Reach in 

fall

3-year average 

<810 1,100 500 200 600
Two-Tier Approach

 Tier 1 – emphasis on conservation 

actions in response to adult or subadult population declines.

 Tier 2 - predator removal if 

conservation actions unsuccessful and 

adult population declines to ≤7,000 

adult HBC.
Humpback Chub – Tier 1 Action Triggers

• If the combined point estimate for adult HBC (≥200 mm) in the Colorado 

River mainstem-Little Colorado River (LCR) aggregation and LCR <9,000

OR

• If recruitment of sub-adult HBC (150-199mm) ≤ estimated adult mortality 

such that:

• a) Sub-adult abundance <1,250 fish (3-yr average) in the spring LCR population 

estimates.

OR

• b) Sub-adult abundance <810 fish (3-yr average) in the fall 

mainstem Juvenile Chub Monitoring reach.
LTEMP -Tier 1 Trigger Response 

Appendix O of EIS/Appendix D of BA

1. Expand translocation actions in the LCR by collecting an additional 300-600 

young of the year HBC and move above Chute Falls in October.

2. Assess efficacy of transporting larval HBC (April/May) into Big Canyon and 

above Blue Springs in the LCR system. Evaluate growth and survival of these 

transplants.

3. Larval fish will be removed from LCR (April/May) and head-started at SNARRC. 

Once fish reach 150-200 mm they will be translocated to the mainstem LCR 

reach the following year.

4. Additional conservation actions as identified and evaluated.
Evaluation of Potential Response Actions

 Assembled fish biologists that developed 

action triggers

 Reviewed LTEMP proposed trigger 

responses

 Identified additional conservation actions 

consistent with # 4 (additional conservation 

actions as identified and evaluated)

 Several ideas

 Consensus to focus on least invasive ideas
Discussion of Potential Response Actions

• Objective

 Focus on immediate conservation actions

• Discussion Points

 Potential explanations for poor production

 Role of spring runoff/summer monsoons

 Reviewed what was learned since trigger document

 Key uncertainties

 Benefits/risks of translocations & other potential actions 
Status of Response to Trigger

• Evaluating options

• Next steps

 Submitted annual report and 

formal notification to FWS

 Focus on least invasive options 

(e.g., Chute Falls)

 Additional info (spring river trips, 

runoff & # of YOY)

 Discussion regarding 5-yr review of 

triggers – summer 2021
Questions?
| 1.       | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Altair Nanotechnologies Inc.; and                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |   |
|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |   |
|  2. | Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |

| Date: April 30, 2013    | By:    | /s/ Stephen B. Huang |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|                                   |   |                      |   |
|                                   |   | Stephen B. Huang,         |   |
|                                   |   |                      |   |
|                                   |   | Chief Financial Officer   |   |
|                                   |   |                      |   |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0408

IN THE MATTER OF:

S.M.H.,

A Youth in Need of Care.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to 

produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Court Reporter Nancy Skurvid is 

granted an extension of time to and including November 16, 2021, 

within which to prepare, file, and serve the transcripts requested on 

appeal. 

The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court 

and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 28 2021

09/28/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0408
PROPOSED ORDER Page 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff,

-VSAMMON BUNDY, et al.,

 Defendants

Case No. 3:16-CR-00051-BR

ORDER FOR PRESERVATION

OF INFORMATION

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on Defendants’ Motion For 

Preservation Order, opposed by the Government, and heard on May 4, 2016; 

and the Court being fully advised, 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that all recorded information, regardless of 

format, possessed by all local, state or federal law enforcement agents or 

agencies, and executive branch agents or agencies, that relates to the 

investigation or prosecution of this case, or the investigation of any individual 

Defendant related to this case, be preserved for the pendency of this action;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States Attorney’s Office for this 

District will provide notice of this Order to all entities that it knows or upon 

reasonable inquiry learns may be in possession of recorded information within 

the scope of this Order, due to participation in the investigation or prosecution 

of this case, or the investigation of any individual Defendant related to this case; 

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 456-1 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 2
PROPOSED ORDER Page 2

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order creates no independent right to 

discovery by Defendants not otherwise afforded by rule, statute or the 

Constitution; and creates no presumption that any recorded information within 

its scope that may have been lost or destroyed, prior to any individual or agency 

receiving notice of this Order, was done in bad faith or for any improper 

purpose.

DATED this day of May, 2016.

ANNA J. BROWN

United States District Court Judge

Submitted by:

Terri Wood, OSB #883325

Law Office of Terri Wood, P.C.

730 Van Buren Street

Eugene, Oregon 97402

541-484-4171

Fax: 541-485-5923

Email: contact@terriwoodlawoffice.com

Attorney for Jon Ritzheimer

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 456-1 Filed 04/25/16 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1 - Certification of Principal Executive Officer



CERTIFICATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Internet America, Inc. (the Company) for the period
ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William E. Ladin, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ William E. Ladin, Jr.William E. (Billy) Ladin, Jr.Chief Executive OfficerDate: May 16, 2005
WEBER RIVER AT GATEWAY, UTLatitude: 41.137Longitude: -111.832Elevation: 4806

WEBER RIVER AT GATEWAY, UT

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Farmington Lower Site Page...



Farmington Lower

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Lost Creek Resv Site Page...



Lost Creek Resv

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Kilfoil Creek Site Page...



Kilfoil Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Redden Mine Lwr Site Page...



Redden Mine Lwr

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Morgan Site Page...



Morgan

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Chicken Ridge Site Page...



Chicken Ridge

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Beaver Divide Site Page...



Beaver Divide

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Brighton Site Page...



Brighton

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Chalk Creek #1 Site Page...



Chalk Creek #1

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Chalk Creek #2 Site Page...



Chalk Creek #2

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Farmington Site Page...



Farmington

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Hayden Fork Site Page...



Hayden Fork

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Horse Ridge Site Page...



Horse Ridge

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Lookout Peak Site Page...



Lookout Peak

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Mill-D North Site Page...



Mill-D North

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Parleys Summit Site Page...



Parleys Summit

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Smith  Morehouse Site Page...



Smith  Morehouse

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Thaynes Canyon Site Page...



Thaynes Canyon

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Trial Lake Site Page...



Trial Lake

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Parleys Upper Site Page...



Parleys Upper

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Hardscrabble Site Page...



Hardscrabble

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Parrish Creek Site Page...



Parrish Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Louis Meadow Site Page...



Louis Meadow
<PAGE>   1









                                  EXHIBIT 24.1




                          Independent Auditors' Consent

The Board of Directors
Intensiva HealthCare Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-29619) on Form S-8 of Intensiva HealthCare Corporation of our report dated
March 2, 1998, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Intensiva
HealthCare Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and
the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
1997 which report is included in the December 31, 1997 annual report on Form
10-K of Intensiva HealthCare Corporation.


/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
March 2, 1998
Exhibit 32.1



Informational Addendum to Report on Form 10-Q

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Not Filed Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934



The undersigned Chief Executive Officer of OYO Geospace Corporation does hereby certify as follows:



Solely for the purpose of meeting the requirements of Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and solely to the extent this certification may be applicable to this Report on Form 10-Q, the undersigned hereby certify that this Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in this Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OYO Geospace Corporation.



/s/ Gary D. OwensName:    Gary D. OwensTitle:      Chief Executive OfficerMay 11, 2004
#### Michele A. Andrew, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of C.A., an Infant, Appellant, v Soo Hurh, M.D., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Submitted April 30, 2007;

decided June 12, 2007

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied *[see 8*NY3d 808].
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 
3 

\ 

82 

n$E&.iirOW~ OndortLis motion, of H. 3. No. EO5, 

Rho ia tho dedgnated agent?" 

&~ea Bill Nor POb, Aate of this 49th Logialature,~ 

$8 an eat amdiing aortain seotlone of I?oueo Bill lo. 457, 

Chaptar 4, Aots OS the 46th Lsgisl&ture, Regular Seksaion, 

1939. Eoueo Bill Ho. 409, Aate of the 46th Legi;ilatum, 

1m Art10163 l,4W3-3., Vwnon*a Anaotated Penal Qod*, Seation 8 

OS xoatue Bill No. 406 A8tr o? the 49th Legl6latur0, a~- 

Soetlon 69 of Hotwe Sill la. 409, Aats or the 46th Logirlatum, ahiah road* aa ~wted above in yaw lottsr. Itwill 

beg II&M that SUbiOn a6 Or &%0x0 l&wda VUI&O~'# &t&3- 

fated Penal Qode (II. B. Ho. 40?, Aots of the 44th Lo&a%* 

fun ) prcnid 08 t 

vho tons *~duignatea agontcrt amns l aak ootm$r 

tax eolloator in tho Stats who amy peciorn hii8 butloo 

undu thie sot' through sny xe5ular deputy.” 

.