alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from (a) Arbor
Software Corporation condensed consolidated balance sheets and condensed 
statements of operations and is qualified in it entirety by reference to such.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           7,793
<SECURITIES>                                    28,825
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,871
<ALLOWANCES>                                       564
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,671
<PP&E>                                           7,182
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,831)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  50,625
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,468
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            11
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,490
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    50,625
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,795
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,859
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (65)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,180
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (763)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,836
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,417
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Integrated BioPharma, Inc.:

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-121601, 333-144155 and 333-149855) of Integrated BioPharma, Inc., of our report dated October 12, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2009 and 2008 and for the fiscal years then ended, which is included        in this Form 10-K filing, which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the ability of Integrated BioPharma, Inc. to continue as a going concern.          

/s/ Amper, Politziner & Mattia, LLP

Edison, New Jersey        October 12, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                             9
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                            19,190
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             5,261
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                       0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                       0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       13,205
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           318,211
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             305,614
<LOANS>                                        1,103,996
<ALLOWANCE>                                        4,182
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,509,861
<DEPOSITS>                                     1,145,562
<SHORT-TERM>                                      39,200
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               27,143
<LONG-TERM>                                      103,243
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           2,013
<OTHER-SE>                                       192,700
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 1,509,861
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   42,596
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 10,155
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     197
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  52,948
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                25,134
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 4,265
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             23,549
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        554
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                     0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   11,702
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   14,082
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         8,840
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                       8,840
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        .55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        .54
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                      3.25
<LOANS-NON>                                        2,181
<LOANS-PAST>                                           0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                       0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                       58
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   4,017
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        239
<RECOVERIES>                                          15
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  4,182
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               4,182
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                0
        


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony R. Porter, Appellant.

Submitted April 9, 2007;

decided April 26, 2007

*942Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Timothy E Murphy, Esq., 260 East Avenue, Lockport, New York 14094 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT





This First
Amendment (this “Amendment”) to the Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated as of February 1, 2018,
by and between Rocky Mountain High Brands, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and David Seeberger (the “Executive”),
is made effective as of this 11th day of May, 2020 (the “Amendment Effective Date”).


For good and
valuable consideration, including the covenants and agreements contained in this Amendment, and intending to continue to be bound
by the Agreement, as amended by this Amendment, the parties hereby agree as follows:


1.                 
Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement.


 


2.                 
Section 2.1 of the Agreement is hereby amended such that that the Executive’s position with the Company will be Chief
Executive Officer, President and General Counsel commencing on the date of this Amendment and continuing through the remainder
of the Employment Term.


 


3.                 
Section 4.1(a) of the Agreement is hereby amended such that the Executive’s Base Salary shall be $150,000, commencing
on the date of this Amendment and continuing through the remainder of the Employment Term.


 


4.                 
All other terms and conditions under the Agreement not otherwise amended, modified or affected by this Amendment shall continue
to be in effect and bind the parties. The Agreement and this Amendment may only be modified with prior written agreement from both
parties.


 


IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment effective as of the Amendment Effective Date.


Company:


Rocky Mountain High Brands, Inc.


 


By: /s/ Michael Welch


Michael Welch, Chairman and Chief
Operating Officer


 


Executive:


 


By: /s/ David Seeberger


David Seeberger
#### DORWIN et al., Respondents, v. WESTBROOK, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

December 8, 1896.)

Action by William E. Dorwin and Charles A. Burr against John B. Westbrook. S. D. Halliday and Thomas D. Husted, for appellant. Martin S. Lynch,' for respondents.

LANDON, J.

This case has been tried three times, and each time the jury has found for the plaintiff, and thus has three times found in effect that the plaintiff Dorwin signed releases in full satisfaction of the canse of action set forth in the complaint by the fraudulent procurement of the defendant The judgment upon the first trial was reversed upon other grounds than that the verdict of the jury was against the weight of evidence; Hardin, P. J., however, expressing his opinion that it was. 71 Hun, 405, 24 N. Y. Supp. 955. The judgment upon the second trial was reversed upon the _ ground, among others, that the verdict of the jury was against the weight of the evidence. 86 Hun, 363, 33 N. Y. Supp. 449. The facts in the record before us bearing upon the execution of the releases- seem to be substantially the same as set forth in the opinion of the court in 86 Hun, 33 N. Y. Supp., and need not be repeated here. I think the verdict is against the weight of the evidence. The question is, shall we again set aside the verdict? There are circumstances of hardship for the plaintiffs in holding them to these releases which will almost inevitably re-*1124suit, if the question should he submitted to the jury (and I think it must be), in_ their again finding the same verdict. As the jury are the final arbiters of the facts, the court must, after affording them reasonable opportunities^ to compare their own opinions of the facts with those held by the appellate court, finally accept the judgment of the jury. It may be, as was once remarked by a learned judge, that “the correctness of judicial opinions on mere questions of fact may well be distrusted when we find them confessedly opposed to the common sense of mankind.” Ernst v. Railroad Co., 35 N. Y. 9, 41. See Kummer v. Railroad Co., 14 Misc. Rep. 507, 35 N. Y. Supp. 1066; Nichols v. Tuttle (Sup.) 12 N. Y. Supp. 394; Fowler v. Insurance Co., 7 Wend. 270; Betsinger v. Chapman, 24 Hun, 16; Talcot v. Insurance Co., 2 Johns. 467; Hamilton v. Railroad Co., 40 N. Y. Super. Ct. 376. I advise an affirmance. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur except MERWIN, J., dissenting.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-30113

Summary Calendar

KEVIN STERLING,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

CITY OF NEW ROADS; COLUMBIA CASUALTY COMPANY,

Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

For The Middle District of Louisiana

Civil Action No. 08-cv-424

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The judgment of the district court is affirmed for this reason:

Mr. Sterling took leave from his employment with the City of New

Roads pursuant to the Family Medical Leave Act. When his leave expired,

Mr. Sterling did not furnish his employer with certification that he was able

to resume work. Mr. Sterling’s failure to provide the City with certification of

his fitness for duty bars his action claiming entitlement to reinstatement

under 29 U.S.C. § 2614(a). The district court correctly rendered judgment to

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 25, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published

*

and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-30113 Document: 00511154674 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/25/2010
No. 10-30113

this effect.

Mr. Sterling admitted in his deposition that he received notice advising

him of his rights and obligations under COBRA. He deliberately elected not

to continue COBRA coverage. No reasonable jury could conclude that Mr.

Sterling received no communication from the City. The district court correctly

rendered judgment that Mr. Sterling’s claim regarding COBRA is meritless.

Judgment AFFIRMED.

Case: 10-30113 Document: 00511154674 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/25/2010
---

Exhibit 32.1





Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350


as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Janus Resources, Inc. (formerly Enthoes Technologies, Inc.) (the “Company”) on the Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Antonino Cacace, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(i)            the Report filed by the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(ii)           The information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.




ENTHEOS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.Date: March 30, 2011
By:
/s/ Antonino CacaceAntonino Cacace

President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial

Officer and Director





This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,913,355
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,938,175
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,695,225
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           94,672
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        50,430
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,573,251
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,695,224
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,175
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               254,711
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (217,536)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (217,536)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (217,536)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.18)


</TABLE>
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1692 

To require public employees to perform the inspection of State and local 

surface transportation projects, and related essential public functions, 

to ensure public safety, the cost-effective use of transportation funding, 

and timely project delivery. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 26, 2015 

Ms. EDWARDS (for herself and Ms. NORTON) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To require public employees to perform the inspection of 

State and local surface transportation projects, and related essential public functions, to ensure public safety, 

the cost-effective use of transportation funding, and 

timely project delivery. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safety, Efficiency, and 

5 Accountability in Transportation Projects Through Public 

6 Inspection Act of 2015’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1692 IH

1 SEC. 2. PUBLIC INSPECTION. 

2 Public employees shall carry out the construction in3 spection functions for all surface transportation projects 

4 receiving Federal funding. 

5 SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS. 

6 In this Act, the following definitions apply: 

7 (1) CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION FUNCTIONS.— 

8 The term ‘‘construction inspection functions’’ means 

9 construction engineering, contract administration, 

10 quality control inspection, materials testing, and 

11 resident engineer and assistant resident engineer 

12 functions. 

13 (2) PUBLIC EMPLOYEE.—The term ‘‘public em14 ployee’’ means an employee of a Federal, State, or 

15 local government. 

16 (3) SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROJECT.—The 

17 term ‘‘surface transportation project’’ means a 

18 project receiving assistance under title 23, United 

19 States Code, a capital project (as defined in section 

20 5302 of title 49, United States Code), and any other 

21 project related to surface transportation that the 

22 Secretary of Transportation determines appropriate. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Case 6:15-cv-00260-AA Document 6 Filed 03/06/15 Page 1 of 27
Case 6:15-cv-00260-AA Document 6 Filed 03/06/15 Page 2 of 27
Case 6:15-cv-00260-AA Document 6 Filed 03/06/15 Page 3 of 27
Case 6:15-cv-00260-AA Document 6 Filed 03/06/15 Page 4 of 27
Case 6:15-cv-00260-AA Document 6 Filed 03/06/15 Page 5 of 27
Case 6:15-cv-00260-AA Document 6 Filed 03/06/15 Page 6 of 27
Case 6:15-cv-00260-AA Document 6 Filed 03/06/15 Page 7 of 27
Case 6:15-cv-00260-AA Document 6 Filed 03/06/15 Page 8 of 27
Case 6:15-cv-00260-AA Document 6 Filed 03/06/15 Page 9 of 27
Case 6:15-cv-00260-AA Document 6 Filed 03/06/15 Page 10 of 27
Case 6:15-cv-00260-AA Document 6 Filed 03/06/15 Page 11 of 27
Case 6:15-cv-00260-AA Document 6 Filed 03/06/15 Page 12 of 27
Case 6:15-cv-00260-AA Document 6 Filed 03/06/15 Page 13 of 27
Case 6:15-cv-00260-AA Document 6 Filed 03/06/15 Page 14 of 27
Case 6:15-cv-00260-AA Document 6 Filed 03/06/15 Page 15 of 27
Case 6:15-cv-00260-AA Document 6 Filed 03/06/15 Page 16 of 27
Case 6:15-cv-00260-AA Document 6 Filed 03/06/15 Page 17 of 27
Case 6:15-cv-00260-AA Document 6 Filed 03/06/15 Page 18 of 27
Case 6:15-cv-00260-AA Document 6 Filed 03/06/15 Page 19 of 27
Case 6:15-cv-00260-AA Document 6 Filed 03/06/15 Page 20 of 27
Case 6:15-cv-00260-AA Document 6 Filed 03/06/15 Page 21 of 27
Case 6:15-cv-00260-AA Document 6 Filed 03/06/15 Page 22 of 27
Case 6:15-cv-00260-AA Document 6 Filed 03/06/15 Page 23 of 27
Case 6:15-cv-00260-AA Document 6 Filed 03/06/15 Page 24 of 27
Case 6:15-cv-00260-AA Document 6 Filed 03/06/15 Page 25 of 27
Case 6:15-cv-00260-AA Document 6 Filed 03/06/15 Page 26 of 27
Case 6:15-cv-00260-AA Document 6 Filed 03/06/15 Page 27 of 27
Exhibit 31.2

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Sam Sarpong, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Broadway Financial Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuers other certifying officer
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(c) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small
business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business
issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses
in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 14, 2006



|                              
|------------------------------
|                              
|/s/ Sam Sarpong               
|Signature                     
|Sam Sarpong                   
|Chief Financial Officer       
|Broadway Financial Corporation