alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Entheos Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on the Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Derek Cooper, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(i)        the Report filed by the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(ii)       The information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein. 

 

|                 |   | **ENTHEOS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.** |
|----------------------|--------|--------------------------------|
| ** **           |   |                           |   |   |
| Date: March 31, 2010 |   | By:                            |   | /s/ Derek Cooper |
|                 |   |                           |   | Derek CooperPresident, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director |

 

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

 

----
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 99.4

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Asta Funding, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Mitchell Herman, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(3)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(4)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company
         as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of
         the Company for the periods presented.

Dated: August 11, 2003



                                           /S/ Mitchell Herman
                                           -----------------------
                                           Mitchell Herman
                                           Chief Financial Officer

This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and has not been filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Asta Funding, Inc. and will be retained by Asta Funding, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Rel: August 23, 2024

STATE OF ALABAMA -- JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT

THE SUPREME COURT SPECIAL TERM, 2024

SC-2023-0702 Steven Mark Hayden v. Western Steel, Inc., and William B. Cashion (Appeal from Elmore Circuit Court: CV-17-900189). STEWART, Justice. AFFIRMED. NO OPINION. See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(F), Ala. R. App. P. Shaw, Acting C.J.,* and Sellers and Mendheim, JJ., and Windom, Kellum, and McCool, Special Justices,* concur. Parker, C.J., and Wise, Bryan, Mitchell, and Cook, JJ., recuse themselves. *Because five members of the Supreme Court, including the Chief Justice, recused themselves, on March 7, 2024, Acting Chief Justice Shaw appointed Presiding Judge Windom, Judge Kellum, and Judge McCool, of the Court of Criminal Appeals, to serve as Special Justices in this appeal.
#### DAVIS, Respondent, v. GIRARD FIRE & MARINE INS. CO. OF PHILADELPHIA, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

December 16, 1896.)

Action by Isaac Davis against the Girard Fire & Marine Insurance Company of Philadelphia.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except FOLLETT, J., dissenting.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PCB BANCORP, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,151,092
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             2,123,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,422,749
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       2,717,144
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     57,978,296
<ALLOWANCE>                                    727,598
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              68,874,521
<DEPOSITS>                                  60,031,341
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,041,843
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       800,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,001,337
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              68,874,521
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              4,000,251
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              334,357
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                73,669
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             4,408,277
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,329,064
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,341,718
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,066,559
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  356,453
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               1,167
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,795,107
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                406,593
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     406,593
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   239,112
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.76
<LOANS-NON>                                     31,988
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               382,122
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   11,127
<RECOVERIES>                                       150
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              727,598
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           365,453
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carlos Ayala, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Juviler, J.), both rendered May 10, 1983, (1) convicting him of robbery in the first degree under indictment No. 3245/82, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence; and (2) convicting him of *480robbery in the first degree, under indictment No. 4559/82, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The complainant testified that she saw the defendant, who she recognized from the neighborhood, as he was jogging nearby, put a ski mask on before robbing her. This identification testimony, if credited by the jury, sufficed to support a finding of guilt under indictment No. 3245/82. Accordingly, the People adequately proved the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see, *People v Talley,*111 AD2d 885).

The court accepted the defendant’s guilty plea with respect to another robbery charge with an agreement that if the conviction after trial were reversed, the defendant would be permitted to withdraw his guilty plea. However, since the conviction after trial is being affirmed, there is no basis to disturb the conviction upon his plea of guilty. Mangano, J. P., Brown, Weinstein and Spatt, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.9


         SCHEDULE OF NON-EMPLOYEES RECEIVING
         STOCK OPTION GRANTS
         NEW YORK BAGEL ENTERPRISES,
         INC.


         NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTIONS

      <TABLE>
      <CAPTION>

         Date                                                              Shares           Strike            Exercised
         Granted                   Director                               Granted            Price          (Cancelled)
         -------                   --------                               -------            -----          -----------
      <S>                          <C>                                 <C>                  <C>             <C>
      1  October 6, 1997           David Murfin                        a   17,500           $6.050 *             -

      2  October 6, 1997           Bill Walsh                          a   17,500           $5.500 *             -

      3  October 9, 1998           Bill Walsh                          a  100,000           $0.750

      4  January 28, 1999          Paul R. Hoover                          17,500           $0.750
                                                                          -------                           -----------
                                                                          152,500                                -
                                                                          -------                           -----------
                                                                          -------                           -----------

      </TABLE>

      a  Nonqualified Stock Options have been issued outside of the New York
         Bagel Enterprises, Inc. Incentive Stock Plan to the above named members
         of the Board of Directors.

      *  These issuances are a result of the Board of Directors meeting dated
         October 6, 1997 in which the Board repriced outstanding options by
         canceling and re-issuing on a one-for-one basis at an exercise price of
         $5.50 per share which is greater than 100% of the quoted close price of
         the stock of the corporation in The Wall Street Journal. In addition,
         such re-priced options are to vest as originally granted such that the
         new vesting periods shall be modified to give credit for the prior
         holding periods.
#### Michael A. Ceccarelli et al. *v.*Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Trumbull et al.

*John. J. Darcy,*in support of the petition.

*Michael L. Riccio,*in opposition.

Submitted March 26

decided April 8, 1975

The petition by the defendants Robert and Helen Cellar for certification for appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Fairfield County is denied.
Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                       OF
               CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Manhattan
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. do hereby certify that:

            (a) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Manhattan
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report:)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (b) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Manhattan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.


Dated: November 14, 2003                /s/ Leonard Firestone
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Leonard Firestone
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer


Dated: November 14, 2003                /s/ Nicholas J. Rossettos
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Nicholas J. Rossettos
                                        Chief Financial Officer and
                                        Chief Operating Officer
# C_2022099EN.01024501.xml

| 1.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 99/245 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 99/245

---

P9_TA(2021)0329

Common system of value added tax: conferral of implementing powers to the Commission to determine the meaning of the terms used in certain provisions *

European Parliament legislative resolution of 7 July 2021 on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC as regards conferral of implementing powers to the Commission to determine the meaning of the terms used in certain provisions of that Directive (COM(2020)0749 — C9-0002/2021 — 2020/0331(CNS))

(Special legislative procedure — consultation)

(2022/C 99/36)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2020)0749), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2020)0749),

| — | having regard to Article 113 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C9-0002/2021), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 113 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C9-0002/2021),

| — | having regard to the reasoned opinion submitted, within the framework of Protocol No 2 on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, by the Swedish Parliament, asserting that the draft legislative act does not comply with the principle of subsidiarity, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the reasoned opinion submitted, within the framework of Protocol No 2 on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, by the Swedish Parliament, asserting that the draft legislative act does not comply with the principle of subsidiarity,

| — | having regard to Rule 82 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 82 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A9-0201/2021), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A9-0201/2021),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

2.

| 3. | Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

3.

| 4. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments. |
| --- | --- |

4.

---
#### AMERICAN EXCH. NAT. BANK v. CASINO CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June, 1896.)

Action by the American Exchange National Bank against the Casino Company.

No opinion. Application denied. See 39 N. Y. Supp. 258.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) of Document Sciences Corporation of our report dated January 22, 1997,
included in the 1996 Annual Report to Stockholders of Document Sciences
Corporation.
 
     We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Form S-8) of our report dated January 22, 1997, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Document Sciences Corporation incorporated
by reference in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
1996. 
 
                                          /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
San Diego, California
March 21, 1997
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. William Mitchell, Appellant, v William Lape, as Superintendent of Marcy Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

Submitted December 11, 2006;

decided February 22, 2007

On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no appeal lies from the order of an indi*877vidual Justice of the Appellate Division *(see*NY Const, art VI, §3 [b]; CPLR 5601). Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that it does not lie from the order of an individual Justice of the Appellate Division *(see*NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b]; CPLR 5602).
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jorge Garcia, Appellant.

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We disagree with the defendant’s assertion that the court improperly marshaled the evidence in giving its instructions to the jury. Reading the charge as a whole, it was fair and balanced and well within the statutory mandate (CPL 300.10 [2]).

Defendant also took exception to the court’s instruction that "circumstantial evidence may often possess more reliable evidence of proof than direct evidence”. We know of no rule of law which states that such an instruction constitutes reversible error, especially in the light of the court’s entire charge on circumstantial evidence. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Kennedy, J. — burglary, second degree, and grand larceny, third degree.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Green, Balio, Lawton and Schnepp, JJ.
# L_2011114EN.01000701.xml

| 4.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 114/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 114/7

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 1062/2009 of 26 October 2009 opening and providing for the management of autonomous Community tariff quotas for certain fishery products for the period 2010 to 2012 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 824/2007

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 291 of 7 November 2009
  )

On page 10, Annex, Order No 09.2774, CN code ex 0304 99 51, third column concerning TARIC code:

for:

‘
  10
  ’,

read:

‘
  11
  ’;

on page 10, Annex, Order No 09.2762, second column concerning CN code:

‘
  ex 0306 21 00
  ’ shall be inserted;

on page 10, Annex, Order No 09.2762, third column concerning TARIC code:

‘
  10
  ’ shall be inserted.

---
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
       Name of Subsidiary                            Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization
       ------------------                            ----------------------------------------------
<S>                                                  <C>
1.  LCC Design Services, L.L.C.                                   Delaware

2.  LCC Europe GmbH                                               Germany

3.  Eurofon de France S.A.R.L.                                    France

4.  LCC, United Kingdom, Ltd.                                     United Kingdom

5.  LCC Development Company, L.L.C.                               Delaware

6.  LCC Telecom Management Services, Inc.                         Delaware

7.  LCC do Brazil Ltda.                                           Brazil

8.  Koll Telecommunications Services, L.L.C.                      Delaware

9.  LCC Asia Pacific LTD PTE                                      Singapore

10. LCC Europe AS                                                 Norway

11. LCC International Holdings NL, Inc.                           Delaware

12. LCC International Holdings, Belgium, Inc.                     Delaware

13. LCC Algeria LLP                                               United Kingdom

14. LCC Italia S.R.L.                                             Italy

15. LCC Egypt                                                     Egypt

16. LCC International GMBH                                        Germany

17. LCC Deployment Services UK, Limited                           United Kingdom

18. Transmast S.R.L.                                              Italy

</TABLE>
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1694 

To amend MAP–21 to improve contracting opportunities for veteran-owned 

small business concerns, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 26, 2015 

Mr. FITZPATRICK (for himself, Mrs. BUSTOS, Mr. YOUNG of Alaska, and Mr. 

KING of New York) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to 

the Committee on Small Business, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend MAP–21 to improve contracting opportunities for 

veteran-owned small business concerns, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fairness to Veterans 

5 for Infrastructure Investment Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISES. 

7 Section 1101(b) of MAP–21 (23 U.S.C. 101 note) is 

8 amended— 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1694 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (2) by adding at the end the 

2 following: 

3 ‘‘(C) VETERAN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESS

4 CONCERN.—The term ‘veteran-owned small 

5 business concern’ has the meaning given the 

6 term ‘small business concern owned and con7 trolled by veterans’ in section 3(q) of the Small 

8 Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(q)).’’; 

9 (2) in paragraph (3) by inserting ‘‘and veteran10 owned small business concerns’’ before the period at 

11 the end; and 

12 (3) in paragraph (4)(B)— 

13 (A) in clause (ii) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

14 end; 

15 (B) in clause (iii) by striking the period at 

16 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

17 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

18 ‘‘(iv) veterans.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS