alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1986 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1986

 To repeal the Environmental Protection Agency's most recent rule for 
                     new residential wood heaters.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 23, 2015

 Mr. Rouzer (for himself, Mr. Sensenbrenner, Mr. Grothman, Mr. Ribble, 
   Mr. Jones, Mr. Walker, Mrs. Hartzler, Mr. Graves of Missouri, Mr. 
     Bishop of Michigan, Mrs. Miller of Michigan, and Mr. Meadows) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To repeal the Environmental Protection Agency's most recent rule for 
                     new residential wood heaters.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop EPA Overregulation of Rural 
Americans''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF RULE FOR NEW RESIDENTIAL WOOD HEATERS.

    The final rule entitled ``Standards of Performance for New 
Residential Wood Heaters, New Residential Hydronic Heaters and Forced-
Air Furnaces'' published at 80 Fed. Reg. 13672 (March 16, 2015) shall 
have no force or effect and shall be treated as if such rule had never 
been issued.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
No. 333-41567 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 333-98051 on Form S-8, and Registration Statement No. 333-112299 on Form S-3 of Prolong International Corporation (the Company) of our report dated February 11, 2004, except for Note
3, as to which the date is April 7, 2004, which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the Companys restatement of its 2002 and 2001 consolidated financial statements, appearing in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K of Prolong International Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2003.



/s/    HASKELL & WHITE LLPHASKELL & WHITE LLP




Irvine, California

September 20, 2004
Exhibit 99.2



|Name:  |  | Steven E. West                            
|------ |  | ------------------------------------------
|Title: |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Sunterra Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven E.
West, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    STEVEN E. WEST




Dated:  April 14, 2003
# L_2010252EN.01015401.xml

| 25.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 252/154 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 252/154

---

DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

of 5 May 2010

on the closure of the accounts of the European Environment Agency for the financial year 2008

(2010/523/EU)

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,

having regard to the final annual accounts of the European Environment Agency for the financial year 2008,

having regard to the Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of the European Environment Agency for the financial year 2008, together with the Agency’s replies (1),

having regard to the Council’s recommendation of 16 February 2010 (5827/2010 — C7-0061/2010),

having regard to Article 276 of the EC Treaty and Article 319 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (2), and in particular Article 185 thereof,

having regard to Regulation (EC) No 401/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the European Environment Agency and the European Environment Information and Observation Network (3), and in particular Article 13 thereof,

having regard to Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 of 19 November 2002 on the framework Financial Regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 185 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 (4), and in particular Article 94 thereof,

having regard to Rule 77 of, and Annex VI to, its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinion of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (A7-0092/2010),

| 1. | Approves the closure of the accounts of the European Environment Agency for the financial year 2008; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward this Decision to the Executive Director of the European Environment Agency, the Council, the Commission and the Court of Auditors, and to arrange for its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union (L series). |
| --- | --- |

2.

The President

Jerzy BUZEK

The Secretary-General

Klaus WELLE

---

(1)  
  OJ C 304, 15.12.2009, p. 60.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 126, 21.5.2009, p. 13.

3

(4)  
  OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p. 72.

4

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carlos Rivera, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lagaña, J.), rendered August 13, 1984, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, assault in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress statements made by him to the police.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Consideration of the six factors set forth in *People v Green*(103 AD2d 362, 363-364) leads us to conclude, contrary to the hearing court that exigent circumstances existed at the time of the defendant’s arrest. Therefore, the warrantless arrest of the defendant must be deemed proper. The defendant’s statement, given in response to a police officer’s inquiry approxi*422mately two hours after his arrest and less than two hours after the defendant was initially advised of his *Miranda*rights, was made after a proper waiver of those rights and was therefore admissible *(see, People v Glinsman,*107 AD2d 710).

Although the supplemental instruction given by the trial court in response to a question from the jury seeking clarification of the definition of intent may have been more particularized than the question warranted, we conclude that the supplemental instruction must be considered nonprejudicial and harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt.

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Niehoff, J. P., Rubin, Eiber and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
UNCOMPAHGRE RIVER NEAR RIDGWAY, COLORADOLatitude: 38.183Longitude: -107.733Elevation: 7523

UNCOMPAHGRE RIVER NEAR RIDGWAY, COLORADO

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Idarado Site Page...



Idarado

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Mineral Creek Site Page...



Mineral Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Red Mountain Pass Site Page...



Red Mountain Pass
PAGE 1 – PARTIAL FINAL JUDGMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

LORI WAKEFIELD, individually and on 

behalf of a class of others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

VISALUS, INC., a Nevada corporation,

Defendant.

Case No. 3:15-cv-1857-SI

PARTIAL FINAL JUDGMENT

Michael H. Simon, District Judge.

Based on the Court’s Orders entered April 26, 2024, and October 2, 2024, pursuant to 

Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT:

Partial judgment is entered in favor of the Certified Class and against Defendant in the 

amount of $638,125.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 2nd day of October, 2024.

/s/ Michael H. Simon

Michael H. Simon

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-01857-SI Document 481 Filed 10/02/24 Page 1 of 1
#### In the Matter of Craig Joosten, Sr., Appellant, v Carol Joosten, Also Known as Carol Boothe, Respondent.

Submitted November 20, 2006;

decided January 11, 2007

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
#### WATSON, Respondent, v. RUSSELL, Appellant.

(Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.

May 17, 1894.)

Action by Alice Watson against John H. Russell.

Argued before BOOKSTAVER, BISCHOFF, and PRYOR, JJ.

Vanderpoel, Cuming & Goodwin, for appellant.

Van Duzer & Taylor, for respondent

No opinion. Motion for leave to appeal to the court of appeals granted. See 28 N. Y. Supp. 26.
#### HALL, Appellant, v. LA FRANCE FIRE INS. CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

July 7, 1896.)

Action by Sylvester W. Hall against the La France Fire Insurance Company.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY **GENE&&** OF ,-Ems **AUSTIN**

Deer Mr. Jonset opinionBo. O-3982 i3et Authority of LegleZature tol sho rilt *

thr m 3.e OS Texas Tsohnologlacal Cot laga land.

It is the opinion of tihio Department that the Legislatureaen authorigs~ a 8alo or the Eale gt (LlOaIm of a portion or the empar of Texts6 Ttmhnologl.et2 Col.lege

not ~the~~~fes

neaeeeery for the use of the oollegeto the City of Lubbod 110 that t&e ei.tr

rpaf sreet aa autlitoriun.thareQn.

I The LoiJShtUlW aho~l.6 pmrtds the 

### aondieeration

to ba reosbived

for suah sale 81:

dtrlee;ate

the determimtion 

### of the oond.&eration to an 0rti0ihtl 0s orriaials af oh* oollege . The fs&d.aturs is oldhad Wsitih all g@*aZKi* mental Pravda which reside in the p@A, subjeat to Su4h \
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           7,053
<SECURITIES>                                     5,943
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,882
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,013
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,823
<PP&E>                                           2,456
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  28,991
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,649
<BONDS>                                             29
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        25,789
<OTHER-SE>                                     (4,476)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    28,991
<SALES>                                          9,711
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,711
<CGS>                                            2,610
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,850
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (151)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   9
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,393
<INCOME-TAX>                                       426
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                967
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       967
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14
        

</TABLE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JAY VICTORIAN, DOC# Y11509, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-4346

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed October 24, 2018. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee 

County; J. Frank Porter, Judge.

Jay Victorian, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, Cornelius C. Demps, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

KELLY, and SALARIO, JJ., and CASE, JAMES R., ASSOCIATE SENIOR JUDGE 

Concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Peter Menzel, Appellant.

The defendant contends that he was deprived of a fair trial as the result of prosecutorial misconduct. In cross-examining the defendant, the prosecutor repeatedly asked him whether it was his testimony that witnesses for the People, with whom his testimony conflicted, had fabricated their stories. Those questions were improper *(see, People v Sykes,*114 AD2d 478). Nevertheless, in light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt, including the testimony of two eyewitnesses who saw the defendant attack Police Officer Andrew Cherpak, the prosecutor’s line of questioning does not arise to the level of reversible error *(see, People v Sykes, supra; People v Brown,*76 AD2d 932; *People v Lopez,*73 AD2d 676).

The comments by the prosecutor during his summation with respect to the discrepancy between the charge in the felony complaint (attempted murder) and the charges for which the defendant was ultimately indicted (attempted assault), and that the indictment on these lesser charges does not make it "any less an offense in the eyes of Andrew Cherpak * * * He’s the one * * * that faced the knife”, were made only in response to the extensive cross-examination of Officer Cherpak on this issue and the reference to that cross-examination by defense counsel in her summation. Under the circumstances, these remarks were not improper. Mangano, J. P., Niehoff, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 168 (Thursday, September 2, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 49314]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19011]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XB381]


Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC); Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council's Protected 
Resources Committee will hold a public meeting via webinar.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Monday, September 20, 2021, from 1 
p.m. to 3:30 p.m. See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for agenda details.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held via webinar. Details on the agenda, 
webinar listen-in access, and briefing materials will be posted at the 
MAFMC's website: https://www.mafmc.org/council-events.
    Council address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N 
State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 674-2331; 
www.mafmc.org.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D., Executive 
Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, telephone: (302) 
526-5255.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management 
Council's Protected Resources Committee will meet to review scoping 
materials for phase two of the Atlantic Large Whale Take Reduction Plan 
which focuses on reducing the risk of entanglement to right, humpback, 
and fin whales in U.S. East Coast gillnet, Atlantic mixed species trap/
pot, and Mid-Atlantic lobster and Jonah crab trap/pot fisheries. The 
measures that will be developed in phase two of this plan have the 
potential to impact several Council managed fisheries and the Protected 
Resources Committee will develop recommendations for Council engagement 
in the scoping process, which extends to October 21, 2021. The Council 
will consider these recommendations at their October meeting.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Shelley Spedden at the Mid-Atlantic Council 
Office, (302) 526-5251, at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.
    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: August 30, 2021.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-19011 Filed 9-1-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
<PAGE>


                                  Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Asta Funding, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Mitchell Herman, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (3)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (4)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of
                  the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated
                  result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.

Dated: May 12, 2003


                                                        /s/ Mitchell Herman
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        Mitchell Herman
                                                        Chief Financial Officer

This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and has not been filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Asta Funding, Inc. and will be retained by Asta Funding, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Glen Canyon Dam Technical Work Group 

Action Item Tracking Report 

(P:\c5amp\uc\rm\amp\twg\mtgs\06may24\Action Item Tracking Rpt.doc) 

Updated: 5/24/06 

Action Number 

(year.mo.day-no.) 

Action Item Assigned to Due Date Status 

2005.11.29&30 

Discussion on the TWG Operating Procedures 

will be postponed until the AMWG Operating 

Procedures are revised in conjunction with 

implementation of the Roles AHG Report. 

1/25/06: Kurt will contact Mike Gabaldon 

regarding the status of the Roles AHG Report 

and report back to the TWG at the next meeting. 

5/24/06: Kurt will continue to try and reach Mike. 

TWG Chair Open 

2004.03.30-2 

Matt Andersen will provide copies of the HBC 

Genetics report being done by Mike & Marlis 

Douglas. No further action until report is 

received. 

Ted Melis Open 

2006.01.25-26 

The HBC AHG will perform a separate review of 

the “Humpback Chub Hatchery Evaluation: 

Prospective Refuge Facilities” report and Glen 

Knowles will provide regular updates to the 

TWG on the status of the HBC AHG’s efforts. 

5/24/06: Scope of Work is being finalized and 

Connie Keeler Foster with Dexter Fish Hatchery 

is slated to begin the work. Glen thinks they are 

on schedule and a report should be ready in the 

next fiscal year. 

Glen Knowles Open 

2006.01.25-26 

Dave Garrett will provide the results of the 

Science Advisors’ review of the Knowledge 

Assessment Report to the SPG at the February 

21 SPG meeting. Even though the document 

was dated in February, it wasn’t out to the SPG 

until April). 

5/24/06: Done.

Dave Garrett Closed
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Jean Roscoe, Appellant, v New York Telephone Company, Respondent. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

— Levine, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed November 15, 1984.

Claimant was discharged from her position as a maintenance administrator with New York Telephone Company on March 10, 1982. She subsequently filed a claim pursuant to Workers’ Compensation Law § 120 contending that her employer had discriminatorily discharged her in retaliation for her filing of two workers’ compensation claims in 1981. The Workers’ Compensation Law Judge held that the employer had not discriminated against claimant and a panel of the *882Workers’ Compensation Board affirmed that determination on November 15, 1984. Thereafter, on November 16, 1984 claimant requested full Board review of the claim. The Board denied the application on February 8, 1985 and claimant commenced the instant appeal on February 9, 1985. We now dismiss.

Claimant’s November 16, 1984 request for full Board review establishes that she had received notification of the Board’s determination as of that date. Accordingly, pursuant to the applicable statutory limitations period, notice of her appeal had to be filed within 30 days from that date, on December 16, 1984 *(see,*Workers’ Compensation Law § 23). Claimant’s request for full Board review of the determination did not toll the statutory time period (Minkowitz, Practice Commentary, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 64, Workers’ Compensation Law § 23 [1986 Supp], p 138). Accordingly, her February 9,1985 notice of appeal was untimely.

Appeal dismissed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Levine, JJ., concur.