alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 29, 2015

NO. 03-14-00257-CV

Maverick County, City of Eagle Pass, Maverick County Hospital District, Maverick 

County Environmental and Public Health Association, and George Baxter, Appellants

v.

Railroad Commission of Texas, Dos Republicas Coal Partnership, Camino Real Fuels, 

LLC; and North American Coal Company, Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE 261ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on March 27, 2014. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. The 

appellants shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
Arizona Game and Fish Department 2022 Warmwater 

Nonnative Fish Summary

March 2022 July 2022 October 2022

Lees Ferry

3 miles

Warmwater

Nonnative Captures

Carp – 1

Green Sunfish – 1

Warmwater

Nonnative Captures

Carp – 34

Green Sunfish – 3

Bluegill – 3

Smallmouth Bass – 2

Warmwater

Nonnative Captures

Bluegill – 77

Smallmouth Bass – 26

Green Sunfish – 18

Carp – 4

Black Crappie – 3

Dam

1

5

10

30

# of Warmwater 

Nonnatives 

40-50 250m sites 

per season
March 2022 July 2022 October 2022

Lees Ferry

3 miles

Warmwater

Nonnative Captures

Carp – 1

Green Sunfish – 1

Warmwater

Nonnative Captures

Carp – 34

Green Sunfish – 3

Bluegill – 3

Smallmouth Bass – 2

Warmwater

Nonnative Captures

Bluegill – 77

Smallmouth Bass – 26

Green Sunfish – 18

Carp – 4

Black Crappie – 3

Dam

1

5

10

30

# of Warmwater 

Nonnatives 

40-50 250m sites 

per season
March 2022 July 2022 October 2022

Lees Ferry

3 miles

Warmwater

Nonnative Captures

Carp – 1

Green Sunfish – 1

Warmwater

Nonnative Captures

Carp – 34

Green Sunfish – 3

Bluegill – 3

Smallmouth Bass – 2

Warmwater

Nonnative Captures

Bluegill – 77

Smallmouth Bass – 26

Green Sunfish – 18

Carp – 4

Black Crappie – 3

Dam

1

5

10

30

# of Warmwater 

Nonnatives 

40-50 250m sites 

per season
March 2022 July 2022 October 2022

Lees Ferry

3 miles

Warmwater

Nonnative Captures

Carp – 1

Green Sunfish – 1

Warmwater

Nonnative Captures

Carp – 34

Green Sunfish – 3

Bluegill – 3

Smallmouth Bass – 2

Warmwater

Nonnative Captures

Bluegill – 77

Smallmouth Bass – 26

Green Sunfish – 18

Carp – 4

Black Crappie – 3

Dam

1

5

10

30

# of Warmwater 

Nonnatives 

40-50 250m sites 

per season
Lees Ferry

Fish 

Assemblage

1991-2022
Lees Ferry

Pearce Ferry
1

5

10

30

60 miles

# of Warmwater 

Nonnatives 

April 2022

Lees Ferry

LCR Confluence

Pearce Ferry

Havasu Canyon

Warmwater Nonnative Captures

Fathead Minnow – 5

Carp – 4

Yellow Bullhead – 4

Green Sunfish – 1

Striped Bass – 1

Red Shiner – 1

170 250m sampled

171 hoop nets
1

5

10

30

60 miles

# of Warmwater 

Nonnatives 

April 2022

Lees Ferry

LCR Confluence

Pearce Ferry

Havasu Canyon

Warmwater Nonnative Captures

Fathead Minnow – 5

Carp – 4

Yellow Bullhead – 4

Green Sunfish – 1

Striped Bass – 1

Red Shiner – 1

170 250m sampled

171 hoop nets
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-4275

_____________________________

JUAN JENKINS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

Mark W. Moseley, Judge.

June 19, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and WINOKUR and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Juan Jenkins, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Holly N. Simcox, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
734 A.2d 1276

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant, v. Jeremy D. GARREN, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Submitted Aug. 9, 1999.

Decided Sept. 8, 1999.

Robert Grossi, Franklin, for Com.

Elissa Stuttler, Franklin, for Jeremy D. Garren.

Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN and SAYLOR, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Based upon our disposition in *Commonwealth v. Williams,*557 Pa. 285, 733 A.2d 593 (1999), we affirm the Order of the Venango County Court of Common Pleas dated February 25, 1998. Furthermore, we remand the matter to the common pleas court for disposition of any remaining issues.

Jurisdiction is relinquished.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Warren Hoffman, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Meehan, J.), rendered March 5, 1984, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, petit larceny, criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, and criminal mischief in the fourth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The sentence imposed upon the defendant as a second violent felony offender on his conviction of burglary in the second degree is the minimum permissible sentence (Penal Law § 70.04 [3] [b]) and, therefore, may not be considered excessive. Nor does the record support a finding that the imposition of this sentence is unconstitutional as applied to this defendant *(see, People v Kepple,*98 AD2d 783; *see also, People v Broadie,*37 NY2d 100).

Finally, the denial of the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to set aside his prior violent conviction is not reviewable on the appeal from the judgment in this case. Mangano, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.
# C_2010094EN.01000101.xml

| 14.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/1

---

COMMISSION OPINION

of 13 April 2010

relating to the plan for the disposal of radioactive waste arising from Quotient Bioresearch (Radiochemicals) Ltd at Trident Park in Cardiff in the United Kingdom, in accordance with Article 37 of the Euratom Treaty

(Only the English text is authentic)

2010/C 94/01

On 13 November 2009, the European Commission received from the British Government, in accordance with Article 37 of the Euratom Treaty, General Data relating to the plan for the disposal of radioactive waste arising from Quotient Bioresearch (Radiochemicals) Ltd.

On the basis of these data and additional information requested by the Commission on 30 November 2009 and provided by the British authorities on 4 January 2010, and following consultation with the Group of Experts, the Commission has drawn up the following opinion:

| 1. | The distances between the facility and the nearest point of another Member State are 210 km for France and 230 km for Ireland. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The distances between the facility and the nearest point of another Member State are 210 km for France and 230 km for Ireland.

| 2. | Under normal operating conditions, the discharges of gaseous and liquid radioactive effluents will not cause an exposure liable to affect the health of the population in another Member State. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Under normal operating conditions, the discharges of gaseous and liquid radioactive effluents will not cause an exposure liable to affect the health of the population in another Member State.

| 3. | Solid radioactive waste will be temporarily stored on site before being transferred to authorised treatment or storage facilities within the United Kingdom. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Solid radioactive waste will be temporarily stored on site before being transferred to authorised treatment or storage facilities within the United Kingdom.

| 4. | In the event of unplanned releases of radioactive effluents which may follow an accident of the type and magnitude considered in the General Data, the doses received in another Member State will not be liable to affect the health of the population. |
| --- | --- |

4.

In the event of unplanned releases of radioactive effluents which may follow an accident of the type and magnitude considered in the General Data, the doses received in another Member State will not be liable to affect the health of the population.

In conclusion, the Commission is of the opinion that the implementation of the plan for the disposal of radioactive waste in whatever form from Quotient Bioresearch (Radiochemicals) Ltd, located at Trident Park in Cardiff, both in normal operation and in the event of an accident of the type and magnitude considered in the General Data, is not liable to result in radioactive contamination of the water, soil or airspace of another Member State.

Done at Brussels, 13 April 2010.

For the Commission

Günther OETTINGER

Member of the Commission

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7361
JAMES L. MERINAR, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PARKERSBURG POLICE FORCE; PARKERSBURG WELFARE OFFICIALS; STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Parkersburg. Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-536-6) Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 24, 1996 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James L. Merinar, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Merinar v. Parkersburg Police , No. CA-95-536-6 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 21, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
GUNNISON RIVER NEAR GUNNISON, COLatitude: 38.542Longitude: -106.95Elevation: 7675

GUNNISON RIVER NEAR GUNNISON, CO

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Cochetopa Pass Site Page...



Cochetopa Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Sargents Mesa Site Page...



Sargents Mesa

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Upper Taylor Site Page...



Upper Taylor

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Butte Site Page...



Butte

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Park Cone Site Page...



Park Cone

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Porphyry Creek Site Page...



Porphyry Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Schofield Pass Site Page...



Schofield Pass
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

November 20, 2012

s1113

Order 

November 20, 2012

145552

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145552

COA: 309590

Washtenaw CC: 05-001533-FH

LEWIS DESHAWN FAIRLEY, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 13, 2012 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Exhibit 10.8

 

SPOUSAL CONSENT

 

I, [*********], am the lawful spouse of [Name of Shareholder]. I hereby acknowledge fully and consent unconditionally and irrevocably that a certain percentage of the equity interest in Beijing Xiaoju Technology Co., Ltd., that is held by and registered in the name of my spouse shall be disposed of pursuant to the arrangements under the Share Pledge Agreement, which were executed by my spouse on March 11, 2016.

 

I further undertake not to take any action against the above arrangements, including making any claim against that such equity interest constitutes my property or community property between myself and my spouse or any relevant rights or interests in connection with such equity interest.

 

	
 
    	
/s/ [*********]
    
	
 
    	
[*********]
    


 











 

Schedule of Material Differences

 

One or more persons executed Proxy Agreement using this form. Pursuant to Instruction ii to Item 601 of Regulation S-K, the Registrant may only file this form as an exhibit with a schedule setting forth the material details in which the executed agreements differ from this form:

 

	
No.
    	
 
    	
Name of Shareholder
    
	
1.
    	
 
    	
CHENG Wei
    
	
2.
    	
 
    	
WANG Gang
    
	
3.
    	
 
    	
ZHANG Bo
    
	
4.
    	
 
    	
WU Rui
    
	
5.
    	
 
    	
CHEN Ting
    


 

2
Lake Powell Disso

Oxygen Modelin

Dennis Kubly

Bureau of Reclamation

Salt Lake City, Utah

TecAp

Glen Canyon Dam 

Discharge Dissolved Oxygen 

Lake Powell CE-QUAL-W2 Model Simula

0123456789

10/10/2006 11/9/2006 12/9/2006 1/8/2007 2/7/2007 3/9

Date

Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L

RE
# L_2010252EN.01015901.xml

| 25.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 252/159 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 252/159

---

DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

of 5 May 2010

on the closure of the accounts of the European Food Safety Authority for the financial year 2008

(2010/525/EU)

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,

having regard to the final annual accounts of the European Food Safety Authority for the financial year 2008,

having regard to the Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of the European Food Safety Authority for the financial year 2008, together with the Authority’s replies (1),

having regard to the Council’s recommendation of 16 February 2010 (5827/2010 — C7-0061/2010),

having regard to Article 276 of the EC Treaty and Article 319 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (2), and in particular Article 185 thereof,

having regard to Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council (3) establishing a European Food Safety Authority, and in particular Article 44 thereof,

having regard to Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 of 19 November 2002 on the framework Financial Regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 185 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 (4), and in particular Article 94 thereof,

having regard to Rule 77 of, and Annex VI to, its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinion of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (A7-0086/2010),

| 1. | Approves the closure of the accounts of the European Food Safety Authority for the financial year 2008; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward this Decision to the Executive Director of the European Food Safety Authority, the Council, the Commission and the Court of Auditors, and to arrange for its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union (L series). |
| --- | --- |

2.

The President

Jerzy BUZEK

The Secretary-General

Klaus WELLE

---

(1)  
  OJ C 304, 15.12.2009, p. 95.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 31, 1.2.2002, p. 1.

3

(4)  
  OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p. 72.

4

---
#### In the Matter of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Respondent, v City of New York et al., Appellants.

Submitted April 30, 2007;

decided May 3, 2007

*967Motion by Nassau County for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein denied as untimely *(see*Rules of Prac of Ct of Appeals [22 NYCRR] § 500.23).
Exhibit 32.2

Informational Addendum to Report on Form 10-Q

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

Not Filed Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

The undersigned Chief Financial Officer of OYO Geospace Corporation does hereby certify as follows:

Solely for the purpose of meeting the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and solely to the extent this certification may
be applicable to this Report on Form 10-Q, the undersigned hereby certify that this Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in this
Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OYO Geospace Corporation.



/s/ Thomas T. McEntireName:

Thomas T. McEntireTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerMay 9, 2008
(logo)HOMESIDE
LENDING, INC.



March 26, 1997



Ms. Tracey A. Waldman
Servicer Compliance Supervisor
Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.
11000 Broken Land Parkway
Columbia, MD 21044-3562



Re:   Officer's Certificate
Calendar Year Ending December 31, 1996



Dear Ms. Waldman:

As an officer of HomeSide Lending, Inc. (HomeSide),  I certify to the best of my
knowledge on behalf of the loans HomeSide  services for Norwest Bank  Minnesota,
N.A. as to the following:



1. have reviewed the activities and performance of HomeSide during the preceding
fiscal year under the terms of the  Servicing  Agreement and to the best of this
officer's knowledge, HomeSide has fulfilled all of its duties,  responsibilities
or obligations under this Agreement throughout such year;
2. 1 have  confirmed  that  HomeSide  is  currently  an  approved  FNMA or FHLMC
Servicer in good standing;
3. 1 have  confirmed  that the fidelity bond and errors and omissions  insurance
policy required under the Servicing Agreement is in full force and effect;
4. All premiums for each hazard  insurance  policy,  flood insurance  policy (if
applicable)  and PMI  policy (if  applicable),  with  respect to each  mortgaged
property,  have been paid and that all such insurance policies are in full force
and effect;
5. All real estate taxes,  governmental  assessments and other expenses  accrued
and due, that if not paid could result in a lien or encumbrance on any mortgaged
property, have been paid;
6. All custodial accounts have been reconciled and are properly funded; and

                                                             (logo)EQUAL HOUSING
     Post Office Box 44090, Jacksonville, FL 32231-4090 904-281-3000      LENDER


(logo)HOMESIDE
LENDING, INC.





7. All annual  reports of  Foreclosure  and  Abandonment  of  Mortgage  Property
required per Section 6050J and 6050P of the Internal Revenue Code, respectively,
have been prepared and filed.

HomeSide  has  recently  renewed  its errors and  omissions  and  fidelity  bond
coverage.  An Evidence of  Insurance  form will be sent to the  attention of Ms.
Kimberly  Ferrel within ten days. You have previously been advised of our change
of fiscal year end to the twelve month  period  ending the last day of February.
The audited financial  statements with  accompanying  audit letters will be sent
within 90 days of our new fiscal year end, also to the attention of Ms. Ferrel.

Finally, enclosed is the completed Servicer Information form as supplied by you.
Should you have any questions please contact Lynda M. Pohwat at (904)281-4705.


Sincerely,


/s/Terry Salazar
Terry Salazar
Vice President


lp
enc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,724,143
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,797,018
<ALLOWANCES>                                   273,524
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,388,783
<PP&E>                                       7,162,453
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,209,759
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              46,912,155
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,359,061
<BONDS>                                        392,489
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        96,138
<OTHER-SE>                                  37,064,467
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                46,912,155
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,304,178
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,201,190
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (49,897)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,847,115)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,847,115)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,847,115)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.64)


</TABLE>
# C_2009295EN.01000501.xml

| 4.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 295/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 295/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5641 — APOLLO/PLIANT)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 295/03

On 26 November 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5641. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5641. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---