alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 31, 2016. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, March 31, 2016 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A16D0293. DAVID COHEN v. JOSEPH ROGERS, JR..
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 12EV015804
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of L Q Corporation, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Sebastian Cassetta, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

      Date: April 2, 2007                      /s/ Sebastian Cassetta
                                               -----------------------
                                               Sebastian Cassetta
                                               Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF INTERNET AMERICA, INC. FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH
31, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,427,249
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,045,388
<ALLOWANCES>                                   158,849
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,551,582
<PP&E>                                       7,453,446
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,645,836
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              42,897,315
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,244,901
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        96,622
<OTHER-SE>                                  33,134,831
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                42,897,315
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            21,148,901
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               30,040,138
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (44,907)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (8,846,330)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (8,846,330)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (8,846,330)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.07)


</TABLE>
#### *Ex Parte*State.

*Arson.*

(Decided November 27, 1913.

63 South. 1006.)

*Arson; Variance.*— Where the indictment alleged that a corn crib was burned, as provided by section 6296, Code 1907, it is not sustained by proof that a barn was burned.

(McClellan and deGraffenried, JJ., dissent.)

Certiorari to Court of Appeals.

Petition by tbe State of Alabama on application of tbe Attorney General for certiorari to review tbe judgment of tbe Court of Appeals reversing and remanding tbe case of *Wright Savage v. State,*8 Ala. App. 334; 62 South. 999, wherein tbe Court of Appeals held that there was a variance between tbe allegations of tbe indictment that a corn crib was burned, and tbe proof that tbe building burned was a barn.

Writ denied.

R. C. Brickbll, Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General,

for tbe State. Tbe construction given section 6296, Code 1907, in tbe case of *Jaclcson v. State,*is too narrow and technical, and tbe Court of Appeals erred in bolding that there was a variance between tbe allegations of tbe indictment, and tbe proof in this case.

*2Jones & Mabry, for appellee.

There was a fatal variance between the allegations and the *proof.*— Jackson *v. State,*145 Ala. 54.

Dowdell, C. J.

— The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

Anderson, Mayfield, Sayre, and Somerville, JJ., concur.

McClellan and de Graffenried, JJ.,

dissent, for that the ruling is made to depend upon *Jackson v. State,*145 Ala. 54, 40 South. 979, and the opinion is entertained that that decision is unsound in its very narrow and technical construction or interpretation of Code 1896, § 4837, now, in substance as presently important, Code 1907, § 6296.
SHADOW MOUNTAIN RESERVOIRLatitude: 40.227Longitude: -105.844Elevation: 8372

SHADOW MOUNTAIN RESERVOIR

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Never Summer Site Page...



Never Summer

Courtesy NRCS - Go to High Lonesome Site Page...



High Lonesome

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Sawtooth Site Page...



Sawtooth

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Bear Lake Site Page...



Bear Lake

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Lake Irene Site Page...



Lake Irene

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Phantom Valley Site Page...



Phantom Valley

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Stillwater Creek Site Page...



Stillwater Creek
#### HUTKOFF, Appellant, v. GORMAN, Respondent.

(City Court of New York, General Term.

October 30, 1896.)

Action by Nathan Hutkoff against Amelia Gorman, as executrix, James Collins, and Robert D. White, Jr.

See 39 N. Y. Supp. 1126.

H. Joseph, for appellant.

D. Leventritt, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The order appealed from must be affirmed, with costs. The entire record and proceedings herein show that all the above persons named as defendants were actually defendants; that they appeared at the trial, and each one tried the issues raised by their respective pleadings. Because of the result of such trial, a judgment was entered in favor of said defendants, and each of them,. and therefore the costs taxed herein were properly allowed, and the judgment entered was right. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNIVISION
COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES OF EARNINGS AND BALANCE SHEET AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001017008
<NAME> UNIVISION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          22,558
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  143,721
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,625
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               177,910
<PP&E>                                         283,685
<DEPRECIATION>                                  78,504
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 974,457
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          141,589
<BONDS>                                        303,138
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            9,090
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,021
<OTHER-SE>                                     512,757
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   974,457
<SALES>                                        693,090
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               693,090
<CGS>                                          241,870
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  241,870
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,192
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,459
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                175,080
<INCOME-TAX>                                    91,536
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             83,544
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   2611
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    80,933
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.69


</TABLE>
#### KANE, Respondent, v. MIDDLETOWN-GOSHEN TRACTION CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

December 1, 1896.)

Action by George Kane against the Middletown-Goshen Traction Company.

No opinion. Motion for leave to appeal to the court of appeals denied.
#### TRAIN, Respondent, v. DAVIDSON, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

December 15, 1896.)

Action by Mary B. Train against George L. Davidson.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-41337

Conference Calendar

 

SAMGODSON ESSELL,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

JONATHAN DOBRE, Warden,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:00-CV-595

--------------------

April 11, 2001

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Samgodson Essell, federal prisoner # 95560-012, appeals the

district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, in

which he sought to raise a challenge to the legality of his

sentence. Essell argues that his claim was properly brought in a

§ 2241 petition because relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is

inadequate as he cannot meet the requirements for filing a

successive § 2255 motion.

Essell has failed to demonstrate that the district court

erred in concluding that § 2255 relief was not inadequate. See
No. 00-41337

-2-

Tolliver v. Dobre, 211 F.3d 876, 877 (5th Cir. 2000). The

district court did not err in dismissing Essell’s petition. This

appeal is without arguable merit, is frivolous, and is therefore

DISMISSED. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.

1983); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
#### MULFORD et al., Appellants, v. GIBBS, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 15, 1897.)

Action by Charles Mulford and others against David N. Gibbs. Robert Godson, for appellants. Charles J. Hardy, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

On the former appeal from an order denying a motion to punish this judgment debtor for contempt, this court reversed such order, and in the opinion it was stated that the motion was granted. 9 App. Div. 490, 41 N. Y. Supp. 273. The order of the court sending back the matter to the special term adopted this course for the purpose of carrying into effect the decision, namely, to grant the motion to punish the defendant for contempt, and not to deny such motion. The order that was entered at special term denying the application must have been from a misapprehension on the part of the learned court as to the effect of our decision. The question presented below was the same that was before us on the former appeal, and the court below should have granted the motion, adjudged the defendant debtor in contempt, and imposed a fine sufficient to compensate the plaintiff for the injury sustained through the violation by the judgment debtor of the injunction order. The order appealed from is therefore reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion to punish the judgment debtor for contempt is granted, with $10 costs; the amount of the fine to be imposed to be fixed upon the settlement of the order.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 202 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 202

   To amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992 to 
                       rename a site of the park.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 2015

  Mr. Turner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992 to 
                       rename a site of the park.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO THE DAYTON AVIATION HERITAGE PRESERVATION ACT 
              OF 1992.

    Section 101(b)(5) of the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act 
of 1992 (16 U.S.C. 410ww(b)(5)) is amended by striking ``Aviation 
Center'' and inserting ``National Museum''.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



The Registrant:
Wilsons The Leather Experts Inc. (Minnesota)
 Direct Subsidiary of Wilsons The Leather Experts Inc.
  Direct Subsidiary of Wilsons Center, Inc.:
  Direct Subsidiary of Rosedale Wilsons, Inc.:
  Direct Subsidiaries of River Hills Wilsons, Inc.:




---



##### 



Direct Subsidiary of Wilsons Leather Holdings Inc.:
  Direct Subsidiaries of Wilsons International Inc.:
   Direct Subsidiary of Wilsons Leather of Delaware Inc.
  Direct Subsidiary of Wilsons Leather of Airports Inc.
  Direct Subsidiary of WWT, Inc.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter Of

ADAM J. RODGERS :

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 2192 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 215 DB 2015

Attorney Registration No. 6 4 987

(Philadelphia)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 19 th day of January , 2018, on certification by the Disciplinary

Board that Adam J. Rodgers, who was suspended for a period of three months, has

filed a verified statement showing compliance with the Order of Suspension and

Pa.R.D.E. 217, and there being no other outstanding order of suspension or

disbarment, Adam J. Rodgers shall resume active status , subject to the terms of

probation

, as outlined in this Court’s order dated June 1, 2016

.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2049 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to prohibit foreign 

nationals from making contributions or donations in connection with 

State and local ballot initiatives and referenda. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 28, 2015 

Mr. DEUTCH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to 

prohibit foreign nationals from making contributions or 

donations in connection with State and local ballot initiatives and referenda. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Keeping Foreign 

5 Money Out of Politics Act of 2015’’. 


Emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2049 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING CONTRIBUTIONS AND DONATIONS BY 

2 FOREIGN NATIONALS IN CONNECTION WITH 

3 BALLOT INITIATIVES AND REFERENDA. 

4 (a) PROHIBITION.—Section 319(a)(1)(A) of the Fed5 eral Election Campaign Act of 1971 (52 U.S.C. 

6 30121(a)(1)(A)) is amended by striking ‘‘election;’’ and 

7 inserting the following: ‘‘election, including a State or local 

8 ballot initiative or referendum;’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to contributions or 

11 donations made, solicited, accepted, or received on or after 

12 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


Emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
OFFiCE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Ronarable PO RO Chamborm, Chairman 

Revenue and T8xatlan COmw&ttee 

tlouae of RsprsaantatlVom 

Austin, Texoa 

Dew Mr. Ohamberrr Oplalon ao. 04R9n 

A 

rte: ConmtltutlonalIty cif nk l pnrOTour request ?or 

matter la am tollora~ 

669 e Warned at t.he Regular 

CounoiY 3 &, deolan?d to be a *joint gotemmenta) agency of thla 

the pther atatem which OOOper8te With 3t.O (SeO.9) 

ens or this Cowiaaion are set forthin Seotlon 4 of th?-Aettc and comprlme wholesome Raremental objeotireaThe Aot I tselt earr3ed no apnro7viatifm, and so Par 

RI) re are adriwd, there has never been mr Rpmcsriatlon made 

to ce8rry ntrt It* purwses. 

There are, of Cfwrs09 certnin con&i tutI.nnaY fnhihltfono govepnln~ the approwlation of muhlic ?oner hy t.ho rerzl?r- 
honorable 1. Il. Chambers - page 1 

lature. Eiret of there in importanoe Is found In Seotlon 44 

of Artf ale III, forbidding any ‘grant, by approprlatlon or 

otherwise, any amount of money out of the treaarry of the 

State, to my lndlridoal , on B olalm, real or pretended, 

rhen the same shall not hate been provided for by preexisting lawOm 

next, of oourse, there la the familiar Seotlon 0 

of Artlole TIII deolarlngr ‘lo money rhall be drawn from 

the tre8aury but in purouanoe of mpeoifio apDronrlatlonm 

made by ëla w, l l l .í NOW, Senate Bill 110. 187 la a etrtutory enaotment entirely auutfiolent rltbln ltaelt to oonstltute pre-exiatlnp IaT for an appropriation to oarry out the 

purposes therein outlined. 

Since a oopy of the proposed appropri8tlon bill djd 

not accomrany the request Por opinion , this Department la not 

attevntlnx to pass on any quemtlon oi' the mafiialenc~ of the 

bill itself. 

Oi course, any approprlatloa made in this connection 

would hare to comply with the requirement of apeoifionea~ of' 

purpose, but there is nothing different in this respect from 

other ordinary appropriation bllla~ 

mstinp thst what we have amid rjll answer the lnqulry In your mind, no are 

Very truly yours 

ATTORWY CEXERAL OF TEXAS 

OS-MR
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hyperion Solutions Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Jeffrey R. Rodek, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. Dated: May 10, 2004 /s/ JEFFREY R. RODEK
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Plant Genetic Resources Conservation Unit: Griffin, GA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Griffin, Georgia Plant Genetic Resources Conservation Unit People & Locations







Tiffany R Shepherd
                        Plant Genetic Resources Conservation Unit

                        




                        
                        Program Support Assistant (Office Automation)
                        Phone: (770) 228-7254
                         ext.  404
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov