alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### O’GRADY’S CASE. Dominick O’Grady’s Executors *v.*The United States.

*On the Proofs.*

*The owners of capim-ed, property recover judgment in this courtunder the*Abandoned or captured property Act. *They file a transcript with the Secretary of the Treasury for payment. The Secretary .refuses to pay any part of the judgment unless the attorney of the owners consents to a written stipulation that a deduction for the internatoevenue tax on cotton he made, subjeet to the future decision*
      *452
      *of the Supreme Court as to its validity. The attorney for the owners signs the stipulation, and the balance, after deducting the tax, is paid. They now bring their action of debt against the Government to recover the amount ivitliheld.*

Eor tlie purposes of an appeal it is held that the Secretary of the Treasury has no right to deduct from a judgment of this court, rendered for the proceeds of captured cotton, the internal-revenue tax of two cents per ponnd on cotton, and that an action will lie against the Government for moneys so withheld.

*Mr. T. J.*D. *Fuller*for the claimant.

*Mr. Alexander Johnston*for the defendants.

Pee cubiasi :

This suit is brought to recover tbe sum of #4,181.40, withheld by tbe Treasury Department in paying a judgment rendered by this court iu favor of tbe claimants for tbe proceeds of a quantity of cotton captured by the military forces of the United States, at Mobile, in 1865.

This court has uniformly, whenever the question has been raised, refused to deduct the internal-revenue tax of two cents per pound from the proceeds of cotton sued for; but this is the first opportunity presented for rendering a judgment for an amount withheld. As the case is expressly prepared to test the question before the appellate court, we need not enter upon a discussion of the matter involved, particularly as the further deduction of the tax in cases of this description is forbidden by the *Act June*10, 1872, (17 Stat. L., 347, 369, § 6.)

We therefore content ourselves with simply putting thematter in a shape to be finally decided elsewhere, by ordering a judgment to be entered in favor of tbe claimants for the amount demanded.
VALLECITO CREEK NEAR BAYFIELD, CO.Latitude: 37.478Longitude: -107.544Elevation: 7908.10

VALLECITO CREEK NEAR BAYFIELD, CO.

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Beartown Site Page...



Beartown

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Stump Lakes Site Page...



Stump Lakes

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Vallecito Site Page...



Vallecito
FOUR MILE DRAW NEAR LAKEWOODLatitude: 32.673Longitude: -104.369Elevation: 3316

FOUR MILE DRAW NEAR LAKEWOOD
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19-0856V

UNPUBLISHED

BETTY MYERS-NOBLE,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: October 5, 2020

Special Processing Unit (SPU);

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA)

Paul R. Brazil, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner.

Adriana Ruth Teitel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On June 10, 2019, Betty Myers-Noble filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.

2

(the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine 

administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza vaccination she received on 

December 13, 2017. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit 

of the Office of Special Masters.

On October 5, 2020, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes

that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at

1. Specifically, Respondent “has concluded that [P]etitioner’s medical course is 

consistent with SIRVA as defined by the Vaccine Injury Table and corresponding 

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required 

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act 

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government 

Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance 

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, 

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that 

the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease 

of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa 

(2012).
2

Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation.” Id. at 5. Respondent further agrees that 

Petitioner suffered the residual effects of her condition for more than six months. Id.

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Storage                    
csv

      Evaporation                    
csv

      Inflow                    
csv

      Inflow Volume                    
csv

      Power Release                    
csv

      Total Release                    
csv

      Release Volume                    
csv

      Pool Elevation                    
csv

      Power Release Volume                    
csv

      Spillway Release                    
csv

      Bypass Release                    
csv

      Delta Storage                    
csv

      Area                    
csv

#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Storage                    
json

      Evaporation                    
json

      Inflow                    
json

      Inflow Volume                    
json

      Power Release                    
json

      Total Release                    
json

      Release Volume                    
json

      Pool Elevation                    
json

      Power Release Volume                    
json

      Spillway Release                    
json

      Bypass Release                    
json

      Delta Storage                    
json

      Area                    
json
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I,Calvin E. Jenness, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qfor the period ended June 30, 2005 of Blount International, Inc.;

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this quarterlyreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this quarterly report;

 

4.             The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and we have:

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors:

 

(a) all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls.

 

Date: August 4,2005

 

 
| /s/Calvin E.  Jenness      |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
| Calvin E.  Jenness         |
| Senior Vice  President and |
| Chief Financial  Officer   |

 

----
# Patent

## Title
Method for forming microporous filter

## Abstract

Although the present invention is described in terms of particular materials and process steps, it will be clear that with appropriate modifications various changes can be made by one skilled in the art within the scope of the following claims.

## Background
## Claims

privilege is claimed are defined as follows:

1. A method of forming a thin porous sheet of ceramic material comprising: binder material; having a rough surface texture; binder material and fix the fine ceramic particles in agglomerates of spiky morphology while substantially maintaining the porosity of the particles; form a slip for casting as a tape; form a porous sheet of ceramic material.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the ceramic particles in the slurry include at least two different oxides capable of reacting together to form a ceramic oxygenate at the spray drying and the calcining conditions.

3. A method of preparing electrode catalyst material for a molten carbonate fuel cell comprising: and particles of electrode catalyst a major portion of which are within size fraction 0.2 to 2 microns, to 1.0 MPa pressure to produce generally spherical, porous agglomerates of about 10-50 microns size with a rough surface texture containing the catalyst particles, 1-6 hours to provide porous, spiky agglomerate particles while substantially maintaining the porosity of the particles, form a slip, porous strip of electrode catalysts with interlocking particles for mechanical strength suitable for fabricating into a fuel cell electrode.

4. The method of claim 2 wherein said electrode catalyst material comprises a cathode catalyst, said catalyst selected from the group consisting of oxides of nickel and oxygenates of lanthanium.

5. The method of claim 4 wherein said catalyst material is LaCoO.sub.3.
# C_2009070EN.01001901.xml

| 24.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 70/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 70/19

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5427 — Dexia Credit Local/Dexia Kommunalkredit Bank)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 70/04)

On 12 March 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5427. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5427. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2002 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2002

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend expensing of 
                    environmental remediation costs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 23, 2015

 Ms. Esty (for herself, Mr. Gibson, Mr. Larson of Connecticut, and Ms. 
   DeLauro) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend expensing of 
                    environmental remediation costs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Brownfields Redevelopment Tax 
Incentive Reauthorization Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF EXPENSING OF ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION COSTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 198(h) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by striking ``December 31, 2011'' and inserting 
``December 31, 2019''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to expenditures paid or incurred after December 31, 2011.
                                 <all>
```
#### John Christodoulides, M.D., Respondent, v First Unum Life Insurance Company, Defendant, and Life Insurance Company of Boston and New York, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[946 NYS2d 527]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Joseph R. Glownia, J.), entered November 17, 2011. The judgment awarded plaintiff money damages against defendant Life Insurance Company of Boston and New York.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously vacated and the same order as in *Christodoulides v First Unum Life Ins. Co.*(96 AD3d 1603 [2012]) is further modified on the law by denying that part of plaintiffs cross motion against defendant Life Insurance Company of Boston and New York, and by vacating the declaration and the award of damages against that defendant, and as further modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in *Christodoulides v First Unum Life Ins. Co.*([appeal No. 1] 96 AD3d 1603 [2012]). Present — Scudder, P.J., Centra, Fahey, Peradotto and Sconiers, JJ.
EAST RIVER AT ALMONT, COLatitude: 38.664Longitude: -106.848Elevation: 8024

EAST RIVER AT ALMONT, CO

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Upper Taylor Site Page...



Upper Taylor

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Butte Site Page...



Butte

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Park Cone Site Page...



Park Cone

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Schofield Pass Site Page...



Schofield Pass
SPRING CREEK NEAR HEBER CITY, UTAHLatitude: 40.509Longitude: -111.439Elevation: 5508

SPRING CREEK NEAR HEBER CITY, UTAH

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Wolf Creek Peak Site Page...



Wolf Creek Peak

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Atwater Site Page...



Atwater

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Beaver Divide Site Page...



Beaver Divide

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Brighton Site Page...



Brighton

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Thaynes Canyon Site Page...



Thaynes Canyon

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Trial Lake Site Page...



Trial Lake
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-13-00376-CV

HILCO RECEIVABLES, L.L.C.,

Appellant and Cross-Appellee

v.

Pedro A. QUIÑONES,

Appellee and Cross-Appellant

From the County Court at Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 333407

Honorable Irene Rios, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE, JUSTICE ANGELINI, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. We 

ORDER all costs of the appeal assessed against the party who incurred them.

SIGNED November 13, 2013.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Monaker Group, Inc. 8-K



Exhibit 10.3


 





Contract
#HPEMKGI202105001


 


AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT


  


This amendment (the “Amendment”) is made
on May 20, 2021 by and between HotPlay Enterprise Limited , a corporation organized and existing under the laws of British
Virgin Island, with its principal office at Ritter House, Wickhams Cay II, PO Box 3170, Road Town, Tortola VG1110, British Virgin
Islands (“HPE”), and Monaker Group, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the United States
of America, with its principal office at 1560 Sawgrass Corporate Parkway, Suite 130, Sunrise, Florida 33323 (“MKGI”)
to the SOW included in the master development and licensing agreement dated March 17, 2021.


 


Background


 


MKGI entered into a master development and licensing agreement
dated March 17, 2021 for the purpose of to license software frameworks “HotNow Platform” from HPE and engage HPE, using
HotNow Platform as the foundation to develop for MKGI assets and extra features required for MKGI’s travel platform (the
“Travel App”) defined by each Statement of Work as provided in Attachment 1 (“SOW”).


 


DEVELOPMENT


 


The Parties wish to amend the terms and conditions set forth in
the SOW by adding scope of work relating to the extra features required for MKGI’s travel platform.


 


IN CONSIDERATION OF the Parties agreeing to amend their
obligations in the SOW, and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the
Parties agree to keep, perform, and fulfil the promises, conditions, agreement, and additional fee below.


 


FEE


MKGI shall make an upfront development
payment of $US600,000 (Six hundred thousand United States dollars) to HPE within five (5) days from the Effective Date of this
Agreement. The payment shall be applied to the work described in the applicable amendment SOW.


  


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have signed and delivered this
Amendment to Development Agreement as of the Effective Date written above.


 


(Signature Page Follows)




     


     


    

 





Contract
#HPEMKGI202105001


  





	HotPlay Enterprise Limited	 	Monaker Group	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	Nithinan Boonyawattanapisut	 	William Kerby - CEO	 
	 	 	 	 
	(Authorized Director)	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	Athid Nanthawaroon	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 



(Authorized Director)
EXHIBIT 31.2

   CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Calvin E. Jenness, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Blount International,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

     (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

     (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financing reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors:

     (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.



Date:  July 30, 2004

/s/ Calvin E. Jenness
----------------------
Calvin E. Jenness
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
#### Milton B. Hollander et al. *v.*Warren D. Anderson et al.

No appearance for either party.

Decided May 21, 1975

The appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Fairfield County at Stamford having been withdrawn, the within motion to dismiss that appeal is dismissed.
November 6 , 2014



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NGOZI ORISAKWE IN HE R CAPACITY AS PRESID ENT AND BOARD CHAIR OF UMUADA IGBO IN DISPORA USA, INC. , HOUSTON CHAPTER;

AN D NGOZI ORISAKWE, IN DIVIDUALLY , Appellant s

NO. 14

- 14

- 00691

- CV V.
BRIDGET B. AKAZIE, A GNES OLOLO COMMY AWA GWU AND JANE DOE NOS. 1

- 20 , Appellee s

________________________________ Today the Court heard its own motion to dism iss the appeal from the order signed by the court below on July 24, 2014. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellant s , Ngozi Orisakwe in her capacity as President and Board Chair of Umuada Igbo in Dispora USA, Inc., Houston Chapter; and Ngozi Orisakwe, Individually , jointly and severally

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.