alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. Department of the Interior

U.S. Geological Survey

GCMRC FY2022 Budget Overview

Technical Work Group Meeting

April 13, 2021

Michael Moran

Southwest Biological Science Center

Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center
FY2022 Potential Budget 

Project Allocations Project Title FY22 Budget 

Request

A Streamflow, Water Quality, and Sediment Transport and Budgeting $1,146,921 

B Sandbar and Sediment Storage Monitoring and Research $906,981 

C Riparian Vegetation Monitoring and Research $332,540 

D Geomorphic Effects of Dam Operations and Vegetation 

Management for Archaeological Sites $300,931 

E Nutrients and Temperature as Ecosystem Drivers $293,855 

F Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology $709,093 

G Humpback Chub Population Dynamics throughout the Colorado 

River Ecosystem $1,834,756 

H Salmonid Research and Monitoring $648,304

I Warm-Water Native and Non-Native Fish Research and Monitoring $671,368 

J Socioeconomic Research in the Colorado River Ecosystem $204,353 

K Geospatial Science and Technology $464,265 

L Remote Sensing Overflight in Support of Long-Term Monitoring and 

LTEMP $283,876 

M Administration $1,427,412 

N Hydropower Monitoring and Research $24,620 

Total $9,249,274 
Lake Powell (NOT GCDAMP Funded)

Project Title FY22* Budget

Lake Powell Water Quality $223,893

* - Last year of funding for this project
Overhead Rates From FY21-23

FY21 

Overhead

FY22 

Overhead

FY23 

Overhead

14% 22% 28%

 Without new building, historical GCRMC OH rates 

were between 14-16%

 FY22 OH rate assumed we would occupy new 

building at beginning of calendar 2022 

 Most recent estimate is to occupy new building in 

Q1 FY2023
Questions?
# L_2010219DE.01002301.xml

| 20.8.2010 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 219/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.8.2010

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 219/23

---

Berichtigung der Richtlinie 2009/134/EG der Kommission vom 28. Oktober 2009 zur Anpassung des Anhangs III der Richtlinie 76/768/EWG des Rates über kosmetische Mittel an den technischen Fortschritt

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 282 vom 29. Oktober 2009
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 282 vom 29. Oktober 2009

Auf Seite 17, im Anhang, Punkt 1 Buchstabe b erster Absatz vorletzter Satz:

anstatt:

„Enthält Phenylendiamine (p-Toluylendiamine).“

muss es heißen:

„Enthält Phenylendiamine (Toluylendiamine).“

Auf Seite 18, im Anhang, Punkt 1 Buchstabe b zweiter Absatz vorletzter Satz:

anstatt:

„Enthält Phenylendiamine (p-Toluylendiamine).“

muss es heißen:

„Enthält Phenylendiamine (Toluylendiamine).“

Auf Seite 18, im Anhang, Punkt 1 Buchstabe c erster Absatz vorletzter Satz:

anstatt:

„Enthält Phenylendiamine (p-Toluylendiamine).“

muss es heißen:

„Enthält Phenylendiamine (Toluylendiamine).“

Auf Seite 18, im Anhang, Punkt 1 Buchstabe c zweiter Absatz vorletzter Satz:

anstatt:

„Enthält Phenylendiamine (p-Toluylendiamine).“

muss es heißen:

„Enthält Phenylendiamine (Toluylendiamine).“

Auf Seite 18, im Anhang, Punkt 1 Buchstabe d:

anstatt:

„Das Mischungsverhältnis muss auf dem Etikett angegeben werden.“

muss es heißen:

„Das Mischverhältnis muss auf dem Etikett angegeben werden.“

---
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: RENEE CUELLAR, DIRECTLY

AND DERIVATIVELY ON BEHALF OF

3 LEGENDARY TIGERS, LLC D/B/A

TIPSY TIGER AND D/B/A EPTX,

 Relator.

'

'

'

'

'

No. 08-19-00035-CV

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

J U D G M E N T

The court has considered this cause on the Relator=s petition for writ of mandamus against 

the Honorable Francisco X. Dominguez, Judge of the 205th District Court of El Paso, Texas, and 

concludes that Relator=s petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. We therefore deny the 

petition for writ of mandamus, in accordance with the opinion of this court.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 30TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2019.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1755 

To amend title 36, United States Code, to make certain improvements in 

the congressional charter of the Disabled American Veterans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 13, 2015 

Mr. MILLER of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 36, United States Code, to make certain 

improvements in the congressional charter of the Disabled American Veterans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONGRESSIONAL CHARTER OF DISABLED 

4 AMERICAN VETERANS. 

5 (a) PURPOSES.—Section 50302 of title 36, United 

6 States Code, is amended— 

7 (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by 

8 striking ‘‘The purposes of the corporation are’’ and 

9 inserting ‘‘The corporation is organized exclusively 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1755 IH

1 for charitable and educational purposes. The pur2 poses of the corporation shall include—’’; 

3 (2) in paragraph (6), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

4 end; 

5 (3) by redesignating paragraph (7) as para6 graph (9); and 

7 (4) by inserting after paragraph (6) the fol8 lowing new paragraphs: 

9 ‘‘(7) to educate the public about the sacrifices 

10 and needs of disabled veterans; 

11 ‘‘(8) to educate disabled veterans about the 

12 benefits and resources available to them; and’’. 

13 (b) DISSOLUTION.—Chapter 503 of such title is 

14 amended by adding at the end the following new section: 

15 ‘‘§ 50309. Dissolution 

16 ‘‘On dissolution or final liquidation of the corpora17 tion, any assets remaining after the discharge or satisfac18 tory provision for the discharge of all liabilities shall be 

19 transferred to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs for the 

20 care of disabled veterans.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT





As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 of Integrated BioPharma, Inc. (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), E. Gerald Kay, the Chief Excecutive Officer of Integrated BioPharma, Inc.(the "Company"), certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to her knowledge:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








Date:           September 28, 2010
By: /s/ E. Gerald KayE. Gerald KayChief Executive Officer
#### Armando Sebastiano *v.*Florence V. Corde et al.

*Vincent M. Zanella, Jr.,*for the appellee (plaintiff).

*Edward F. Allen,*pro se, the appellant (defendant).

Argued April 1

decided April 1, 1975

The plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the appeal of the defendant Edward F. Allen from the Court of Common Pleas in Fairfield County is denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Thomas Hardy, Appellant.

On the afternoon of August 19, 1984, the defendant was arrested for possession of cocaine. According to the arresting officer, he observed three men huddled beside a service road and, upon approaching them, noticed that the defendant was holding a plastic bag containing a white powder. When the men became aware of the police officer’s presence, they ran; the officer chased and apprehended the defendant. The police officer testified that the defendant admitted the powder was cocaine, but stated that he only wanted to buy $30 worth. Thereafter, on two separate occasions, the defendant allegedly made similar statements.

*677The defendant presented four witnesses who testified that they went to the park with the defendant and other members of a block association for a picnic. They saw a man run by with a police officer in pursuit. A short time later, the police officer returned, grabbed the defendant and stated something to the effect, "If I don’t get him, I’m taking you”. The four defense witnesses testified that they never lost sight of the defendant and that he did not engage in any drug transaction. The defendant argued that the police officer lied about the incident and fabricated the statements he supposedly made after his arrest.

On this appeal, the defendant contends that the trial court improperly conveyed to the jury the impression that the defendant in fact made the statements, and erred when it denied his request that the jury be charged that the defendant denied making the statements attributed to him. We agree.

In its charge to the jury, the court repeatedly referred to the "defendant’s statements to the police while in custody”, and specifically stated "remember *there was a statement*he made saying something about I only wanted to buy $30 worth. It is your recollection of *what he said*that controls”. In its charge on identification, the court indicated that to support their claim that the police had "the right man”, the People presented the testimony of the arresting officer and stated "[t]hey offered the evidence of his statements that he was only trying to buy $30 worth”. The court did instruct the jurors that they could not consider the statements as evidence if they found they were involuntarily made; however, under the circumstances of this case, the jurors should also have been told that they could not consider the statements unless the People established beyond a reasonable doubt that the statements were actually made, and that the defendant had no burden to prove he did not make the statements *(see,*1 CJI [NY] 11.10 pp 686-687; *People v Martin,*115 AD2d 565).

The court also erred when it denied the jury’s request to have the testimony of the defense witnesses read back to it. The request was clear and unequivocal, and should have been granted *(see, People v Arcarola,*96 AD2d 1081). The cumulative effect of these errors deprived the defendant of a fair trial. Lazer, J. P., Niehoff, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.
#### Bamberger *et al. v.*Fire Ass’n of New York. Same *v.*Mutual Fire Ins. Co. Same *v.*Armstrong Fire Ins. Co.

*(Superior Court of New York City, General Term.*

June 27, 1890.)

Reference—When Denied.

In actions on insurance policies, where each defendant charges fraud on the part of insured, defendants’ motions for a compulsory reference are properly denied.

Appeal from special term.

Action by Jacob F. Bamberger and others against the Fire Association of New York, the Mutual Fire Insurance Company, and the Armstrong Fire Insurance Company. From an order denying their motions for a reference, defendants appeal.

Argued before Freedman and Ingraham, JJ. '

*Stine & Calman, (Joseph H. Choate,*of counsel,) for appellants. *Hoadley, Lauterbach & Johnson, (Edgar M. Johnson,*of counsel,) for respondent.

Freedman, J.

These three actions have been brought to recover moneys due on account of three policies of insurance covering plaintiffs’ stock of merchandise at their store in Louisville, Ky. These policies form part of a *230total number of 144 policies upon the whole stock of said merchandise. In ■each of these actions the defendant has set up a charge of fraud on the part ■of the insured. For this reason the motion made by each defendant for a compulsory reference was properly denied. True, the character of the action ' is to be determined from the complaint. But, in exercising its discretion upon the question whether a reference shall or shall not be compelled, the ■ court will look at the papers submitted by both sides; and, if it should ap- ■ pear that a charge of serious fraud is involved in the issues, the motion may well be denied, even if the action be referable. With the exercise of that dis■cretion the general term will not interfere. The views already expressed render it unnecessary to determine the question of power. In each case the -order appealed from should be affirmed, but there should be only one bill of -costs. All concur.
ex_188140.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 


 


Fiscal 2020 Executive Incentive Plan. On May 21, 2020, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”) of American Superconductor Corporation (the “Company”) and the Board of Directors of the Company approved an executive incentive plan for the Company’s fiscal year ending March 31, 2021 (“fiscal 2020”). Participants in the plan include the Company’s chief executive officer and all other current executive officers. Pursuant to the plan, each participant is designated a target cash incentive amount, expressed as a percentage of the participant’s base salary. The Committee is responsible for determining the payout under the plan to each participant except the chief executive officer. The Board of Directors of the Company determines the payout under the plan for the chief executive officer, taking into account the recommendation of the Committee.


 


The amount of the incentive award actually paid to each participant may be less than or greater than the participant’s target cash incentive, with the amount capped at 200% of the target incentive. For each participant, individual incentive awards will be determined following the end of fiscal 2020 based on the following factors and their corresponding weightings:


 


	
			 

				
			•

				
			 

				
			the Company’s operating cash flow for fiscal 2020 as compared to the established target – 50%

			



 


	
			 

				
			•

				
			 

				
			the Company’s revenues for fiscal 2020 as compared to the established target – 25%

			



 


	
			 

				
			•

				
			 

				
			the Company’s operating expenses for fiscal 2020 as compared to the established target – 25%

			



 


The following table sets forth the target cash incentive for fiscal 2020 for each current executive officer:


 


	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
			Executive Officer

				
			  

				
			Title

				
			  

				
			Target Incentive

			as % of

			Base Salary

				
			 

				
			 

				
			Target Incentive

				
			 

			
	
			Daniel P. McGahn

				
			  

				
			Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

				
			  

				
			 

				
			100

				
			%

				
			 

				
			$

				
			525,000

				
			 

			
	
			John W. Kosiba, Jr.

				
			  

				
			Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

				
			  

				
			 

				
			55

				
			%

				
			 

				
			$

				
			178,750
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>


</LEGEND>

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                       MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                       0
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        5,710,899
<ALLOWANCES>                                           311,709
<INVENTORY>                                          1,719,779
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     7,611,712
<PP&E>                                               5,833,204
<DEPRECIATION>                                       1,148,389
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      15,784,818
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               17,029,511
<BONDS>                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                2,077,200
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                   948
<OTHER-SE>                                          (4,475,124)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        15,784,818
<SALES>                                             12,998,410
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    12,998,410
<CGS>                                               10,044,639
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        2,951,708
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        15,727
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     440,907
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (453,070)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (453,070)
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (453,070)
<EPS-BASIC>                                            (0.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            (0.64)


</TABLE>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Pest Management Research: Sidney, MT
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    NPARL
                        Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory
                                    Agricultural Systems Research Unit
                                    Grasshoppers: Their Biology, Identification and ManagementSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Sidney, Montana Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory Pest Management Research Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Collaborations The Pest Management Research has a long and productive history of collaborative research involving stakeholders.  Current collaborators and projects:  Flowering Rush Agent Rearing and Collection  Pre-release Monitoring and Rearing Development for Bagous Nodulosus, a Biological Control Agent for Flowering Rush  Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) Impacts on Biocontrol and Parasitoid Diversity in Wheat and Alfalfa  Geospatial Artificial Intelligence for Spatiotemporal Modeling of Pest Insects


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.02

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Transmeta Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John O'Hara
Horsley, Chief Financial Officer, Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, amended; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company for the periods presented therein.

Date: August 4, 2004                            By: /s/ JOHN O'HARA HORSLEY
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Chief Financial Officer,
                                                Vice President, General Counsel
                                                and Secretary
                                                Transmeta Corporation

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Transmeta Corporation and will be retained by Transmeta
Corporation and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-46874, 333-86785 and 333-59582) of Liquid
Audio, Inc. (currently known as L Q Corporation, Inc.) of our report dated March
21, 2005 with respect to the financial statements and schedule of the Company
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004
and 2003.

/s/ Rothstein Kass & Company, PC

Roseland, New Jersey
March 21, 2005
#### Wright, Respondent, v. Peterson, Appellant.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department.*

May 2, 1890.)

No opinion. Order modified to be settled by Hardin, J., on five days’ notice.