alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Larry A. Oster et al., Doing Business as Sum Place, Petitioners, v New York State Liquor Authority, Respondent.

— Kane, J.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of respondent which suspended petitioner’s liquor license for 10 days.

A review of the record reveals that respondent’s resolution of the credibility issue presented to it is supported by substantial evidence. In particular, the testimony of David Broceo and Tomi Tompkins provides sufficient evidence to support the conclusion that petitioner violated Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 65 (1). Accordingly, we may not disturb respondent’s determination *(see, Matter of Di Maria v Ross,*52 NY2d 771; *Matter of Cumberland Farms Food Stores v State Liq. Auth.,*86 AD2d 742, *Iv denied*56 NY2d 504).

Finally, we find no merit in petitioner’s contention that the *860penalty imposed by respondent is excessive and so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness. The determination should therefore be confirmed.

Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Weiss, Mikoll and Harvey, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Mario Berlicchi, Appellant.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mangano, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.
Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive 

Management Program

February 9, 2022
TRIBAL LIAISON

•Quarterly meetings with all five tribes as a 

group

•Quarterly meetings with each individual 

tribe on DOI funded projects

•Cultural Sensitivity Training

•Annual meeting in August, LTEMP 

programmatic agreement (APRIL)
LTEMP Programmatic Agreement

ANNUAL MEETING

August 4th- (5TH) 2022 

45 Days Prior to Annual Meeting

June 20th- Provide AMG and LTEMP PA 

Signatories with GCDAMP Annual Report

30 Days to provide comment on Annual 

Report

July 20th Deadline for Comment

Develop 8/4 Agenda with Comments


TRIBAL ENGAGEMENT, 

OUTREACH & INTERNSHIPS

• Memorandum of Agreement regarding Non-Native Fish

Zachary Nelson, Ph.D., Regional Archaeologist

• Trout Management Flows Tribal Perspectives

Kerri Pedersen, Biologist

• Stakeholder River Trip

Clarence Fullard
Budget Discussions

FUTURE CONSIDERATIONS

• Indigenous River Runners 

• Tribal Biologist and Archeologists river 

trip.

•Open to all discussions for inclusion and 

participation

9
Jamescita Mae Peshlakai

Native American Liaison

jpeshlakai@usbr.gov

C# 928-606-2883
#### Laura E. Thompson *vs.*Northwestern Guaranty Loan Co.

Submitted on briefs Nov. 22, 1893.

Affirmed Dec. 21, 1893.

No. 8384.

Review of order granting or refusing a new trial.

Where the order of the court below in granting a new trial is fairly within its discretionary power, it will be sustained by this court. *Hieles*v. *Stone,*13 Minn. 434, (Gil. 398.)

Appeal by plaintiff, Laura E. Thompson, from an order of the District Court of Hennepin County, *Frederick*Hooker, J., made April 6, 1893, granting a new trial.

On March 16,1892, plaintiff, a married woman forty five years old, was injured in the ground floor of the Guaranty Loan Building in Minneapolis. A glass plate seven inches square in this floor slipped out of its place when she stepped upon its edge and her left foot went through the hole and she fell and received serious injury. She brought this action against the owner, the Northwestern Guaranty Loan Company, to recover damages. She claimed that the glass tile had become loose and dangerous and that defendant neglected to examine and inspect the floor and repair the defect. She had a verdict for |10,380. Defendant moved for a new trial and the Court granted it, saying: There was no evidence that any of defendant’s officers knew of the defect in the floor, nor did the evidence warrant the jury in finding that the defect had existed for such a length of time that defendant in the exercise of ordinary care ought to have discovered it.

*F. F. Davis,*for appellant.

*Keith, Evans, Thompson á Fairchild*and *Charles J. Bartleson,*for respondent.

Buck, J.

The action of the court below in granting a new trial was fairly within its discretion, and, following the rule laid down in *Hicks*v. *Stone,*13 Minn. 434, (Gil. 398,) the order granting a new trial is affirmed.

(Opinion published 57 N. W. Rep. 223.)
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements of National Processing, Inc. of our report dated February 1, 1999,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of National Processing,
Inc. included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1998.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Registration Statement              Description                                Shares Registered
----------------------              -----------                                -----------------
<S>                                 <C>                                        <C>
Form S-8 (33-53345)                 Nonemployee Directors Stock                  200,000
                                    Option Plan

Form S-8 (33-53347)                 1996 Stock Option Plan                     4,000,000
</TABLE>



                                                        /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP



Cleveland, Ohio
March 30, 1999
U.S. Department of the Interior

U.S. Geological Survey

Protocol Evaluation Panels

Scott VanderKooi

Southwest Biological Science Center

Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center
Project Element 8.3.Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive 

Management Program Fisheries Research, 

Monitoring, and Management Actions Protocol 

Evaluation Panel

This panel will conduct a review of all aspects of the 

GCRMC fisheries program described in Projects 6, 7, 8, 

and 9 of the FY15–17 workplan. They will make 

recommendations regarding the scope and direction of 

the program as well as provide an evaluation and 

recommendations for future work with respect to the 

level of effort, study design, and relevance of individual 

research activities.
Project Element 8.3.Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive 

Management Program Fisheries Research, 

Monitoring, and Management Actions Protocol 

Evaluation Panel

 Project 6. Mainstem Colorado River Humpback Chub 

Aggregations and Fish Community Dynamics

 Project 7. Population Ecology of Humpback Chub in 

and around the Little Colorado River

 Project 8. Experimental Actions to Increase 

Abundance and Distribution of Native Fishes in 

Grand Canyon

 Project 9. Understanding the Factors Determining 

Recruitment, Population Size, Growth, and Movement 

of Rainbow Trout in Glen and Marble Canyons
Project Element 11.5. Science Review Panel of 

Successes and Challenges in Non-native 

Vegetation Control in the Colorado River and 

Rio Grande Watersheds

Objectives:

To convene a science expert review panel 

composed of natural resource managers and 

riverine research scientists to examine successes 

and challenges in non-native vegetation control in 

the Colorado River and Rio Grande watersheds, 

and to seek recommendations from that group as 

to how to plan a scientifically-based riparian 

management control program applicable to the 

Colorado River ecosystem in Glen, Marble and 

Grand Canyons.
Project 1.2 Reservoir Limnology/ecology and 

linkage Protocol Evaluation Panel

The panel will focus on reservoir limnology and 

ecology, because the characteristics of Lake 

Powell will determine the long-term characteristics 

of the CRe. At the downstream end of the 

ecosystem, the limnology of Lake Mead is 

occasionally determined by inflows from controlled 

floods. Navigation across the emergent delta of 

Lake Mead is strongly affected by the storage 

contents of the reservoir. GCMRC is committed to 

working with Reclamation to identify a robust 

monitoring and research program that can aid in 

making future decisions about water management 

of these two large reservoirs.
# L_2009241EN.01000501.xml

| 12.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 241/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 241/5

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 835/2009

of 11 September 2009

amending Council Regulation (EC) No 872/2004 concerning further restrictive measures in relation to Liberia

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 872/2004 concerning further restrictive measures in relation to Liberia, (1) and in particular Article 11(a) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 872/2004 lists the natural and legal persons, bodies and entities covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources under that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 872/2004 lists the natural and legal persons, bodies and entities covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources under that Regulation.

| (2) | On 12 August 2009, the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council decided to amend the identifying information of one person to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply. Annex I should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 12 August 2009, the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council decided to amend the identifying information of one person to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply. Annex I should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 872/2004 is hereby amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 September 2009.

For the Commission

Eneko LANDÁBURU

Director-General for External Relations

---

(1)  
  OJ L 162, 30.4.2004, p. 32.

1

---

ANNEX

Annex I to Council Regulation (EC) No 872/2004 is amended as follows:

The entry ‘Martin George. Other information: Ambassador of Liberia to the Federal Republic of Nigeria’, shall be replaced by the following:

‘Martin George. Other information: (a) Former Ambassador of Liberia to the Federal Republic of Nigeria; (b) Associate of former President Charles Taylor with ongoing ties to him; (c) Alleged to have provided funds to former President Taylor. Date of designation referred to in Article 6(b): 9.6.2005.’

---
EXHIBIT 21

SRS LABS, INC.
SUBSIDIARIES

|Name                                        |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation |  | Ownership                      
|------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------- |  | -------------------------------
|SRSWOWcast.com, Inc.                        |  | Delaware                      |  | SRS Labs, Inc.100% Direct     
|ValenceTech Limited                         |  | Bermuda                       |  | SRS Labs, Inc.100% Direct     
|Valence Technology Limited ("ValenceH.K.") |  | Hong Kong                     |  | ValenceTech Limited100% Direct
|Valence Semiconductor Design Limited        |  | Hong Kong                     |  | Valence H.K.100% Direct       
|ASP Microelectronics Limited ("ASP")        |  | Hong Kong                     |  | Valence H.K.100% Direct       
|LEC Electronic Components Limited ("LEC")   |  | Hong Kong                     |  | Valence H.K.100% Direct       
|VSD Electronics Limited                     |  | Hong Kong                     |  | Valence H.K.100% Direct       
|LEC Microelectronics Limited                |  | Hong Kong                     |  | ASP100% Direct                
|LEC Electronics Limited                     |  | Hong Kong                     |  | LEC100% Direct                

---

QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INTERIM
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND BALANCE SHEET AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q COMMUNICATIONS & POWER
INDUSTRIES, INC. FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JULY 2, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001000564
<NAME> COMMUNICATIONS & POWER INDUSTRIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-02-1999
<CASH>                                           7,041
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,685
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     55,329
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               114,276
<PP&E>                                          77,184
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 234,851
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          208,524
<BONDS>                                        121,215
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           23,298
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,028
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   234,851
<SALES>                                        187,192
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               187,192
<CGS>                                          148,647
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  148,647
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,092
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,237
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,232)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,232)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,232)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-50543

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUAN ANGEL MARTINEZ-GONZALEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 6:13-CR-7-1

Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Juan Angel Martinez-Gonzalez 

(Martinez) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Martinez has filed a response. To the extent that 

Martinez’s response reflects that he wishes to raise claims of ineffective 

assistance of trial counsel, the record is insufficiently developed to allow 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 29, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-50543 Document: 00512515745 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/29/2014
No. 13-50543

consideration at this time of Martinez’s claims; such claims generally are not 

resolved on direct appeal when they have not been developed in the district 

court. See United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006). We 

have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein, as well as Martinez’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment 

that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused 

from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 13-50543 Document: 00512515745 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/29/2014
Exhibit








Larry Keener Retirement Letter, Dated January 28, 2020


January 28, 2020


Mr. Bill Boor
CEO and President, Cavco Industries
3636 North Central Avenue
Phoenix, AZ 85012


Dear Bill,


Please accept this letter as notification of my decision to retire effective March 28, 2020. Accordingly, I will be resigning all of my positions with Palm Harbor Villages, Standard Casualty Insurance and, all other Cavco owned entities effective March 28, 2020 as well.


It has been a pleasure working with you this past year. I only regret we did not have more time together. I am certain you will do wonderful things for Cavco, its people, shareholders, and customers during your tenure.


Finally, I want to personally thank you for securing the maturity acceleration and, extension of my remaining stock option exercise rights. It is very much appreciated.


With warmest regards,


/s/ Larry Keener


Larry Keener
Order entered December 29, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 15 - 01006 - CV IN RE THE GUARDIANSHIP OF SYDNEY AYN LAROE,

AN INCAPACITATED PER SON On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. PR - 09 - 3185 - 1



### O RDER We GRANT appellant’s December 2 1, 2015 unopposed second motion for an extension of time to file a brief. Appellant shall file a brief by JANUARY 4, 2016
. /s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 11

                              DATAWORKS CORPORATION
                 STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                      (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
                                   (UNAUDITED)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          THREE MONTHS ENDED              NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                              SEPTEMBER 30,                 SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                       ------------------------        ---------------------
                                                         1996             1995           1996          1995
                                                       ---------        -------        -------       -------
<S>                                                    <C>              <C>            <C>           <C>
Primary:
Average shares outstanding                                 7,780          4,360          7,674         4,285
Net effect of dilutive stock  options - based on
the treasury stock method using average market price          --          1,099            505         1,099
                                                       ---------        -------        -------       -------
Totals                                                     7,780          5,459          8,179         5,384
                                                       =========        =======        =======       =======

Income (loss) before extraordinary item                $    (684)       $ 1,123        $ 1,479       $ 1,690
Extraordinary item                                            --           (627)            --          (627)
                                                       ---------        -------        -------       -------
Net income (loss)                                      $    (684)       $   496        $ 1,479       $ 1,063
                                                       =========        =======        =======       =======

Per share information:
   Income (loss) before extraordinary item             $    (.09)       $   .20        $   .18       $   .31
   Extraordinary item                                         --           (.11)            --          (.11)
                                                       ---------        -------        -------       -------
   Net income (loss)                                   $    (.09)       $   .09        $   .18       $   .20
                                                       =========        =======        =======       =======
</TABLE>


Fully dilutive effect of stock options on per share amounts for the three and
nine month periods ended September 30, 1996 and 1995, has not been presented
since any reduction of less than 3% in the aggregate need not be considered as
dilution.


                                       14
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joshua Liner, Appellant.

Submitted January 8, 2007;

decided January 11, 2007

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Steven Banks, Esq., the Legal Aid Society, 199 Water Street, New York, NY 10038 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
#### In the Matter of Allen Gutterman et al., Appellants, v Edward Caliguiri et al., Respondents.

[945 NYS2d 879]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Jane Goodman, J.), entered May 24, 2011, denying petitioners’ motion to vacate an arbitration award, and confirming the award, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioners failed to establish that the award was irrational *(see Kalyanaram v New York Inst. of Tech.,*79 AD3d 418, 419-420 [2010], *lv denied*17 NY3d 712 [2011]).

We have considered petitioners’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Moskowitz, Renwick and Abdus-Salaam, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2011 NY Slip Op 30855(U).]
#### BENDHEIM, Respondent, v. KERBS et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June, 1896.)

Action by Henry M. Bendheim against Adolf Kerbs and Louis Stern.

No opinion. Order, as modified, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and appeal from order denying motion for resettlement dismissed, with $10 costs.