alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 171 (Wednesday, September 8, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 50367]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19281]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Submission for OMB Review; 30-Day Comment Request; Evaluation of 
Office of Acquisitions System (OASYS) and FFRDC Contract Administration 
System (FCAS) Vendor Portals National Cancer Institute (NCI); 
Correction

AGENCY: National Institutes of Health, HHS.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Health and Human Services, National 
Institutes of Health published a Notice in the Federal Register on 
August 31, 2021. That Notice requires a correction in the SUPPLEMENTARY 
INFORMATION section.

ADDRESSES: Written comments and recommendations for the proposed 
information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of 
this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular 
information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day Review--
Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marla Jacobson, 9609 Medical Center 
Drive, MSC 9742, Rockville, MD 20850 or call non-toll-free number 240-
276-5267 or email your request, including your address to: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#214c40534d400f4b40424e43524e4f614f48490f464e57"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9cf1fdeef0fdb2f6fdfff3feeff3f2dcf2f5f4b2fbf3ea">[email protected]</span></a>. Formal requests for additional plans and 
instruments must be requested in writing.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Correction

    In the Federal Register of August 31, 2021, in FR Doc. 2021-18767, 
on page 48747, as found within the Supplementary Information section, 
within the Estimated Annualized Burden Hours table for the Total Annual 
Burden Hours for the form name column Survey--FCAS total currently 
reads ``1'' and is corrected to read: ``0'', the form name column 
Registration--FCAS total currently reads ``1'' and is corrected to 
read: ``0''. These corrections revise the Total Annual Burden Hours 
total currently reads ``232'' and is corrected to read: ``230''.

    Dated: September 1, 2021.
Diane Kreinbrink,
Project Clearance Liaison, National Cancer Institute, National 
Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. 2021-19281 Filed 9-7-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Bernard Kantor et al., Respondents, v Leisure Glen Homeowners Association, Inc., Appellant.

[944 NYS2d 640]—

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Tanenbaum, J.), dated May 18, 2011, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

“Under the ‘storm in progress rule,’ a landowner ‘generally cannot be held liable for injuries sustained as a result of slippery conditions that occur during an ongoing storm, or for a reasonable time thereafter’ ” *(Weller v Paul,*91 AD3d 945, 947 [2012], quoting *Mazzella v City of New York,*72 AD3d 755, 756 [2010]; *see Marchese v Skenderi,*51 AD3d 642 [2008]). However, once a landowner elects to engage in snow removal activities, it is required to act with reasonable care so as to avoid creating a hazardous condition or exacerbating a natural hazard created by the storm *(see Chaudhry v East Buffet & Rest.,*24 AD3d 493, 494 [2005]; *Friedman v Stauber,*18 AD3d 606, 606-607 [2005]; *Grau v Taxter Park Assoc.,*283 AD2d 551, 551-552 [2001]).

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, it failed to demonstrate its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. The defendant failed to establish that the storm in progress rule applied herein, since the climatological data from a nearby town and the injured plaintiff’s deposition testimony, both of which were submitted by the defendant in support of the motion, conflicted as to whether precipitation was falling at or near the time of the accident *(see Lester v Ackerman,*82 AD3d 847 [2011]; *see also Calix v New York City Tr. Auth.,*14 AD3d 583, 584 [2005]). Furthermore, the defendant failed to adequately demonstrate that the snow removal efforts it underook neither created nor exacerbated the allegedly hazardous condition which caused the injured plaintiff to fall *(see Salvanti v Sunset Indus. Park Assoc.,*27 AD3d 546 [2006]; *Chaudhry v East Buffet & Rest.,*24 AD3d at 494). Since the defendant failed to sustain its prima facie burden, we need not consider the ade*1178quacy of the plaintiffs’ submissions in opposition to the motion *(see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med.*Ctr,64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]; *Lester v Ackerman,*82 AD3d at 847-848).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Mastro, A.EJ., Florio, Chambers and Roman, JJ., concur.
#### MAHONEY, Appellant, v. CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fifth Department.

December 28, 1895.)

Action by Catherine Mahoney against the city of Niagara Falls.

No opinion. Order affirmed, costs of this appeal to abide the event.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-22-00432-CV

Melissa Goodman, Appellant

v.

Housing Authority of the City of Austin, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY 

NO. C-1-CV-20-002172, THE HONORABLE TODD T. WONG, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant’s brief was originally due on November 9, 2022. On 

December 7, 2022, this Court sent a notice to appellant informing her that her brief was overdue 

and that a failure to file a satisfactory response by December 19, 2022, would result in the 

dismissal of this appeal for want of prosecution. To date, appellant has not filed a brief or a 

motion for extension of time. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See

Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

__________________________________________

Edward Smith, Justice

Before Justices Baker, Kelly, and Smith

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: February 23, 2023
Exhibit 32.2**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**     In connection with the Annual Report of Wilsons The LeatherExperts Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-K for thefiscal year ended January 28, 2006, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Stacy A. Kruse, Chief FinancialOfficer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     1) the Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended; and     2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.     /s/ Stacy A. Kruse       **Stacy A. Kruse** **Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer**Date: April 12, 2006
#### In the Matter of Roger Macon, Appellant, v James P. Sullivan, as Superintendent, et al., Respondents.

The respondents’ determination which denied the petitioner’s application to participate in the Work Release Program was reached after consideration of all appropriate factors and was not affected by irrationality bordering on impropriety *(see, Matter of Gonzalez v Wilson,*106 AD2d 386; *Matter of Hoffman v Wilson,*86 AD2d 735).

We have considered the contentions raised in the petition*732er’s *pro se*brief and find them to be without merit. Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Lawrence and Hooper, JJ., concur.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 19

- 00353

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF T.H.C. , a Child

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2008

- CI

- 19681

Honorable Cynthia Marie Chapa, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. Costs of

court for this appeal are taxed against Appellant Claudia Lopez.

SIGNED January 15, 202 0.

_____________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
UNITED ST A TES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

DEMARCUS ROGERS, 

Plaintiff, 

3: 15-CV-02122-PK 

vs. 

NAl'!CY BERRYHILL, 

Commissioner of Social Security, 

Defendant. 

ORDER 

It is hereby ORDERED that attorney fees in the amount of $1,634.18 and costs for filing 

fees in the amount of $400 shall be awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice 

Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Attorney fees will be paid to Plaintiff dependent upon verification that 

Plaintiff has no debt which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees and costs, pursuant to the 

Treasury Offset Program as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (20 l 0). 

If Plaintiff has no such debt, then the check shall be made out to Plaintiff and mailed to 

Plaintiffs attorney's office as follows: Merrill Schneider, P.O. Box 14490, Portland, OR 97293. 

If Plaintiff has a debt, then the check for any remaining funds after offset of the debt shall be 

made to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiffs attorney's office at the address stated above. 

DAT£om;,-LJ±_~,yof NJ0{//)17 

1

\ ) 

)/ l~/~y p P ul Papak 

United States Magistrate Judge
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

s hould not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________ No. 97-60730

_______________

THAXTER PITTMAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,
VERSUS SONAT OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

(1:96-CV-289GR)

_________________________ November 12, 1998 Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *

Thaxter Pittman appeals the denial of r elief, following a
bench trial, in his action for damages under the Jone s Act and general ma ritime law following an accident in which he claims injuries from a fall. The district court entered a comprehensive
“Bench Opinion” on September 30, 1997, finding that Pittman's testimony lacked credibility, in part because of inconsistencies in his accou nt of the incident and because surveillance showed his2

testimony on damages was untrustworthy. In its opinion, the court carefully explained why, especially unde r Gautreaux v. Scurlock Marine , Inc. , 107 F.3d 331 (5th Cir. 1997), Pittman cannot recover under the Jones Act.
In reviewing a bench trial, we apply the clear error standard
to factual findings. Our review of the record reveals no error in
the district court's determinations, and its legal conclusions are sound. We AFFIRM, essentially for the reasons set forth in the district court's opinion.
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 10.16


                                    June 3, 1999

Mr. Kim Mayyasi
12 Commonwealth Avenue #401
Boston, MA  02116

Dear Kim:

Vialog is pleased to offer you the position of Chief Executive Officer,
reporting to the Board of Directors at a bi-weekly salary of $13,461.54, which
is equivalent to an annual rate of $350,000.  You will be eligible to
participate in Vialog's bonus compensation program up to an annual potential of
$100,000.  The details of this performance-based bonus will be determined no
later than 30 days after your start date with the company.  In addition, Vialog
will grant you a stock option to purchase 250,000 shares of Vialog Common Stock
subject to the approval of the Board of Directors at the first scheduled Board
of Director's meeting after your hire date.  Your Vialog stock options will vest
over a three-year period, with an equal, proportionate share of the total
options vesting quarterly.  These options will be granted at the market price
for Vialog stock effective as of the date on which this offer letter is signed.

You will also be eligible to participate in Vialog's health, dental, executive
disability and additional benefit plans offered to other employees on similar
terms.  You will be required to execute a copy of Vialog's standard Invention,
Non-Disclosure and Non-Competition Agreement.

Upon acceptance of the terms and conditions outlined in this letter, we will
begin preparation of an Employment Agreement.  If Vialog terminates your
employment with the company for reasons unrelated to "cause", you will receive
separation pay for a period of six months after your last day of work.  Further,
as this offer is contingent upon the completion of a successful background
check, please provide me with the names of three professional references.

This offer expires at 5:00 pm on Monday, June 7, 1999.  Assuming you accept this
offer, we would like you to start on or before Monday, July 5, 1999.
<PAGE>

Letter to Kim Mayyasi
June 3, 1999
Page 2 of 2

We are confident that you will lead Vialog closer to its vision of being a world
class organization that consistently exceeds the expectations of its employees,
clients and shareholders.  I personally look forward to working with you to help
create a dynamic and rewarding enterprise for all of our stakeholders.

Please indicate your acceptance of this offer by signing below.

Sincerely,

/s/ Clarissa A. Peterson

Clarissa A. Peterson
Vice President-Human Resources

/s/ Kim Mayyasi
-------------------
Agreed and accepted

6/3/99
------
Date
# L_2016044EN.01002001.xml

| 19.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 44/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 44/20

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 597/2009 of 11 June 2009 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 188 of 18 July 2009
  )

On page 110, Article 26(1), second sentence:

for:

‘In the absence of a proper and timely reply a verification visit may not be carried out.’,

read:

‘In the absence of a proper and timely reply, the Commission may choose not to carry out a verification visit.’.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2139 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 557
105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2139

                          [Report No. 105-318]

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
            coastwise trade for the vessel YESTERDAYS DREAM.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June, 5, 1998

 Mr. Thurmond introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

                           September 9, 1998

               Reported by Mr. McCain, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
            coastwise trade for the vessel YESTERDAYS DREAM.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTIFICATE OF DOCUMENTATION.

    Notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 
U.S.C. App. 883), section 8 of the Act of June 19, 1886 (24 Stat. 81, 
chapter 421; 46 U.S.C. App. 289), and sections 12106 and 12108 of title 
46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may issue a 
certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for 
employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel YESTERDAYS DREAM, 
United States official number 680266.
                                     

                                                       Calendar No. 557

105th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2139

                          [Report No. 105-318]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
            coastwise trade for the vessel YESTERDAYS DREAM.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 9, 1998

                       Reported without amendment
```
Case 2:15-cv-02071-HL Document 151 Filed 04/15/22 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-cv-02071-HL Document 151 Filed 04/15/22 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-cv-02071-HL Document 151 Filed 04/15/22 Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 170 (Tuesday, September 7, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 50079]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19267]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration


Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; 
Discontinuation; NOAA Community-Based Restoration Program Progress 
Reports

AGENCY: National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice, discontinuation of OMB Control Number.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce, in accordance with the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), invites the general public and other 
Federal agencies to comment on proposed, and continuing information 
collections, which helps us assess the impact of our information 
collection requirements and minimize the public's reporting burden. The 
purpose of this notice is to notify the public that NOAA intends to 
request discontinuation of OMB Control Number 0648-0472. The 
information collections under this control number are being merged into 
NOAA information collection 0648-0718 to improve efficiency and 
consolidate like collections.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or 
specific questions related to this discontinuation should be directed 
to Adrienne Thomas, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2a6b4e58434f44444f045e4245474b596a44454b4b044d455c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="58193c2a313d36363d762c303735392b1836373939763f372e">[email protected]</span></a>, 240-477-2372.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 8, 2021, a notice was published in 
the Federal Register (86 FR 30444) seeking public comments on NOAA's 
request to extend information collection 0648-0472, NOAA Community-
based Restoration Program Progress Reports, which currently expires 
December 31, 2021.
    In the interest of efficiency and consolidating similar 
collections, NOAA determined it was appropriate to merge the reporting 
requirements of 0648-0472 to OMB Control Number 0648-0718, NOAA 
Financial Assistance Performance Progress Reports. NOAA will publish a 
30-day notice of submission for information collection 0648-0718 that 
identifies this merge request. Once approved by OMB, control number 
0648-0472 will be discontinued.

Sheleen Dumas,
Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief Information 
Officer, Commerce Department.
[FR Doc. 2021-19267 Filed 9-3-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2006246EN.01000701.xml

| 13.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/7

---

Imposition by France of a public service obligation for scheduled air services between Strasbourg and Warsaw

(2006/C 246/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

| 1. | France has decided to impose a public service obligation on scheduled air services between Strasbourg and Warsaw pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 of 23 July 1992 on access for Community air carriers to intra-Community air routes. |
| --- | --- |

1.

France has decided to impose a public service obligation on scheduled air services between Strasbourg and Warsaw pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 of 23 July 1992 on access for Community air carriers to intra-Community air routes.

2.   The public service obligation is as follows:

2.1.   Frequency

The minimum level of service provided between Warsaw and Strasbourg must be three round trips per week, all year round. The flights in question must be non-stop. Two out of these three flights must be scheduled on a Monday and a Thursday.

2.2.   Type of aircraft used and minimum capacity provided

The services must be operated by jet aircraft with at least 48 seats.

2.3.   Timetables

The timetable must coincide with parliamentary sessions, i.e. arriving at Strasbourg on Monday close to but no later than 14:00 for the session beginning at 15:00 and leaving Strasbourg on Thursday close to but no earlier than 17:00, when the sessions end.

2.4.   Flight bookings

Seats on these flights must be marketed by a computerised booking system.

2.5.   Continuity of service

Except in cases of force majeure, the number of flights cancelled for reasons directly attributable to the carrier must not exceed 2 % of the number of flights scheduled in any IATA scheduling season. The carrier must give a minimum of six months' notice before discontinuing these services.

Community carriers are hereby informed that the operation of air services without regard to the abovementioned public service obligation may result in administrative and/or criminal penalties.

---
#### PEOPLE, Respondent, v. CUMAER, Appellant.

(Supreme Court. General Term, Third Department.

December 28, 1895.)

Action by the people of the state of New York against Irving Cumaer.

No opinion. Motion for reargument granted.
# C_2006275EN.01003501.xml

| 11.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 275/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 275/35

---

Guidelines on National Regional aid for 2007-2013 (1)

1

National regional State aid map: Malta

(2006/C 275/13)

(Text with EEA relevance)

N 631/2006 — MALTA

National regional State aid map 1.1.2007-31.12.2013

(Approved by the Commission on 12.10.2006)

| Zone Code | Zone Name | Ceiling for regional investment aid (2)

  (applicable to large enterprises) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1.   Regions eligible for aid under Article 87(3)(a) of the EC Treaty until 31.12.2013 |
| MT | Malta | 30 % |

Zone Code

Zone Name

Ceiling for regional investment aid (2)

2

(applicable to large enterprises)

Regions eligible for aid under Article 87(3)(a) of the EC Treaty until 31.12.2013

MT

Malta

30 %

---

(1)  OJ C 54, 4.3.2006, p. 13.

1

(2)  For investment projects with eligible expenditure not exceeding EUR 50 million this ceiling is increased by 10 percentage points for medium sized companies and 20 percentage points for small companies as defined in the Commission Recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (OJ L 124, 20.5.2003, p. 36). For large investment projects with eligible expenditure exceeding EUR 50 million, this ceiling is subject to adjustment in accordance with paragraph 67 of the Guidelines on national regional aid for 2007-2013.

2

---