alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Characterizing the fish assemblage of 

the Lake Powell forebay: identifying the 

potential for nonnative fish escapement 

through Glen Canyon Dam and into the 

lower Colorado River 

Phaedra Budy, Casey Pennock, Barrett Friesen, and 

Gary P. Thiede 
Historical conditions: withdrawal from hypolimnion 

Epilimnion 

Hypolimnion 

flow 
Current conditions: withdrawal from epilimnion 

 

Epilimnion 

Hypolimnion 

flow 

Current level: 3523 ft 
Objectives 

1. Characterize the potentially ‘entrainable’ fish population in Lake 

Powell 

• Space, depth, and seasons 

2. Determine the likelihood that a fish that does get entrained, 

will survive the journey 
Efforts to date 

• November pilot sampling 

• March full sampling

• Temperature and Oxygen Profile 

• Gill netting 

• Minnow trapping 

• Larval fish tows 

• Each of three sites sampled three times 

• BoR TSC = Hydroacoustics 

• New graduate student Barrett Friesen

• Pre-project presentation 4/8 
Sample locations 

Wahweap 

Confluence 

Forebay 
epilimnion 

November 2021 

(forebay) 
November 2021 

(forebay) 

March 2022 
November pilot sampling 
March full spring sampling, n= 137 
March full spring sampling: gillnets 
March full spring sampling: gillnets 
Walleye were very gravid and eating lots of 

shad 
March full spring sampling: gillnets 

Mean depths of gillnet (m) 
 

March full spring sampling: minnow traps 

Juveniles Average = 46 mm TL (31-71 mm) 
 

 

Next steps 

• Intensive larval tows continuing in May 

• Next full sample early June (August, Autumn) 

• Telemetry ~ Summer Sensor Fish 

• Depths 

• Movement 

• Fish Sensor tags ~ Summer 90 mm 

Temperature 

Pressure 

Gyroscope (orientation) 

Tri-axial accelerometer (change in acceleration) 
Bureau of Reclamation 

• Clarence Fullard • Kerri Pedersen • Mike Horn • Mark McKinstry 

Utah State UniversGlen Canyon RecreArea • Jeff Arnold 

Acknowledgment
March full spring sampling: gillnets
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory: Sidney, MT
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Research Units
                        Agricultural Systems Research
                                    Pest Management Research
                                    Grasshoppers: Their Biology, Identification and Management:
                    Plains Area OfficeSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us






Productsheadline bar No pages to list.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### NEFF'S CASE. George W. Neff v. The United States.

*On the Proofs.*

*The Treasury concedes the right of a surveyor of customs to recover, as designated depositary ofpitblie moneys, his commissions on ordinary deposits to the extent of*§1,500 *tuiihin a maximum compensation of*$5,000 *per annum, but controverts Ms right to recover commissions upon “*transfer deposits.”

A surveyor of customs acting as designated depositary of public moneys is not entitled to commissions upon “ *transfer deposits,” i. e.,*upon moneys transferred to him by other departments of the Treasury as distinguished from moneys paid to him as the representative of the Treasury.

*Messrs. Chase, Bartley é Coleman*for the claimant.

*Mr. Assistant Attorney-GeneralMcMiehael*for the defendants.

Nott, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court:

• It is understood in this case that the petition alleges the right of the claimant as surveyor of customs, performing the duties of collector, at Cincinnati, to a maximum compensation of $5,000 and no more; that the Treasury has accorded this right in the settlement of the claimant’s accounts; that the Treasury also concedes the right of the claimant to recover, as *“*designated depositary,” his commissions on ordinary deposits within the maximum before mentioned of $5,000 per annum, and that the only question really in dispute is, whether a *u*des*234ignated depositary” is entitled to commissions upon “transfer deposits,” *i. e.,*upon' moneys transferred to him by other departments of the Treasury, as distinguished from moneys paid to him as the representative of the Treasury itself.

Upon that question we are all agreed that the claimant is not entitled to recover, and the reasons for the decision are set forth in the opinion in *McLean’s Case,*(ante.)

Therefore judgment will be rendered for only the claimant’s commissions upon the deposits paid to him as “ designated depositary *f*which, under the *Act 2d March,*1853, (10 Stat. L., p. 172,) are to be computed as follows:

From 9th October, 18G6, to 30th June, 1867:

Maximum compensation, (atrateof $5, OOOperannum) $3,529 00

Paid to him by the Treasury, (at rate of $3,000 per annum). $2,118 11

Earned for storage... Commissions earned as depositary. 1,243 75

-3? 361 86

From 1st July, 1867, to 30th June, 186S :

Maximum compensation one fiscal year. $5,000 00

Paid to him by the Treasury. $3,000 00

Allowed for storage.-. 1, 891 71

Balance of commissions to be recovered.. 108 29

- 5,000 00

From 1st July, 1868, to 30th April, 1869:

Maximum compensation, (atrateof $5,000 per annum) $4,166 60

Paid to him by the Treasury, (at rate of $3,000 per annum). $2,500 00

Allowed by the Treasury for storage.... 1,108 35

Balance of commissions to be recovered. 558 25

- 4,166 60

G-iving as the commissions to be recovered:

For first fiscal year. $1,243 75

For second fiscal year.. .. 108 29

For third fiscal year. 558 25

Amounting in the aggregate to. 1,910 29

The judgment of the court is that the claimant recover $1,910.29.

*235Drake, Cb. J., dissented from tbe judgment, but agreed that tbe claimant was not entitled to recover commissions upon tbe “ transfer deposits.”
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 167 (Wednesday, September 1, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49049-49050]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-18819]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs

[212A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900253G]


Indian Gaming; Approval of Tribal-State Class III Gaming Compact 
in the State of Washington

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice publishes the approval of the Fifth Amendment to 
the Tribal-State Compact (Amendment) for Class III Gaming between the 
Snoqualmie Indian Tribe (Tribe) and the State of Washington (State).

DATES: The amendment takes effect on November 1, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of 
Indian Gaming, Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary--Policy and 
Economic Development, Washington, DC 20240, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cebeafbba2afe0a6afbcba8eaca7afe0a9a1b8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dcacbda9b0bdf2b4bdaea89cbeb5bdf2bbb3aa">[email protected]</span></a>, (202) 
219-4066.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under section 11 of the Indian Gaming 
Regulatory Act (IGRA), Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq., the 
Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the Federal Register notice 
of approved Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class 
III gaming activities on Indian lands. As required by 25 CFR 293.4, all 
compacts and amendments are

[[Page 49050]]

subject to review and approval by the Secretary. The Amendment 
authorizes the Tribe to engage in sports wagering at the Tribe's class 
III gaming facility, updates the Compact to reflect this change in 
various sections, and incorporates Appendix S, Sports Wagering. The 
Amendment is approved.

Bryan Newland,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2021-18819 Filed 8-31-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337-15-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
DECLARATON OF KEITH KARNES IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR 

ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS - 1

KEITH D. KARNES, OSB # 033521

keith@rankkarneslaw.com

Rank & Karnes Law, PC

2701 12th St. S.E.

Salem, OR 97302

Tel: (503) 385-8888

Fax: (503)385-8899

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON

PORTLAND DIVISION

JONATHAN HUNSAKER, AND

CHERYL HUNSAKER,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

Case No. 6:16-cv-00386-MC

DECLARATON OF KEITH KARNES IN 

SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION 

FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS

I, Keith Karnes, make this declaration subject to penalty of perjury. 

1. Keith Karnes has substantial experience in bankruptcy and bankruptcy litigation. 

2. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true copy of invoices for time spent by Keith Karnes 

and paralegals. 

Case 6:16-cv-00386-MC Document 38 Filed 08/12/19 Page 1 of 3
DECLARATON OF KEITH KARNES IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR 

ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS - 2

3. Attorneys at Stris & Maher LLP. and Geyser P.C. focus on appellate litigation. The firms 

litigate cases in the Supreme Court of the United States and other courts of appeals 

nationwide. 

4. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true copy of the invoice for law firm Stris & Maher

LLP.

5. Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a true copy of the invoice for law firm Geyser P.C.

6. All attorney fees incurred were done so on a contingent basis.

Dated: August 12, 2019

Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ Keith D. Karnes

Keith D. Karnes, OSB No. 033521

Attorney for Plaintiffs

Rank & Karnes Law, PC

2701 12th St. SE

Salem, Oregon 97302

keith@rankkarnes.com

(503) 385-8888

Case 6:16-cv-00386-MC Document 38 Filed 08/12/19 Page 2 of 3
DECLARATON OF KEITH KARNES IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR 

ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS - 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Keith Karnes, certify that I filed the foregoing document via ECF which will in turn 

serve:

Keith D. Karnes keith@rankkarneslaw.com, 9982680420@filings.docketbird.com, 

jacob@rankkarneslaw.com

Boris Kukso boris.kukso@usdoj.gov, western.taxcivil@usdoj.gov

Yael Bortnick Yael.Bortnick@usdoj.gov, western.taxcivil@usdoj.gov

Dated: August 5, 2019

/s/ Keith D. Karnes

Keith D. Karnes, OSB No. 033521

Case 6:16-cv-00386-MC Document 38 Filed 08/12/19 Page 3 of 3
# C_2005320EN.01000801.xml

| 15.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/8

---

Notice of the expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2005/C 320/05)

Further to the publication of a notice of impending expiry (1), following which no request for a review was received, the Commission gives notice that the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will shortly expire.

1

This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 (2) on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community.

2

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Coke of coal in pieces with a diameter of more than 80 mm | People's Republic of China | Anti-dumping duty | Commission Decision No 2730/2000/ECSC (OJ L 316, 15.12.2000, p. 30) (suspended by Council Regulation (EC) No 2117/2004 — OJ L 367, 14.12.2004, p. 3) as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 997/2004 (OJ L 183, 20.5.2004, p. 1) | 16.12.2005 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry

Coke of coal in pieces with a diameter of more than 80 mm

People's Republic of China

Anti-dumping duty

Commission Decision No 2730/2000/ECSC (OJ L 316, 15.12.2000, p. 30) (suspended by Council Regulation (EC) No 2117/2004 — OJ L 367, 14.12.2004, p. 3) as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 997/2004 (OJ L 183, 20.5.2004, p. 1)

16.12.2005

---

(1)  OJ C 130, 27.5.2005, p. 8.

1

(2)  OJ L 56, 6.3.1996, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 461/2004 (OJ L 77, 13.3.2004, p. 12).

2

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

PRINCE MIGUEL ISMAEL, 

Plaintiff, 2:16-cv-00683-MC 

v. ORDER 

JASON BELL, et al., 

Defendants. 

Mcshane, District Judge. 

Plaintiff's allegations against defendants Bell and Jones 

fail to state a claim for the reasons set forth in defendants 

Motion to Dismiss (#16) . It is well settled that respondeat 

superior is not a proper basis for liability under § 1983. 

Plaintiff's Amended complaint does not allege any facts that 

would subject to either defendant Bell or Jones to liability 

for the alleged actions of John W. Kile - who has yet to be 

served or waive service and is not properly before the court 

1 - ORDER 

Case 2:16-cv-00683-MC Document 27 Filed 12/29/16 Page 1 of 2
i 

I at this stage of the proceedings. 1 

However, plaintiff's Response (#24) to defendants' motion 

requests that he be allowed to file a third amended complaint. 

Plaintiff's request is allowed. Plaintiff is allowed 30 days 

from the date of this order to file a third amended complaint. 

No further amendments will be allowed. 

Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss (#16) is denied 

without prejudice to request reconsideration after plaintiff 

has filed an amended pleading. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this Z~ day of December, 2016. 

\.._ __ _ 

Michael J. Mcshane 

United States District Judge 

1 

The court will not request waiver of service on Mr. Kile 

unless and until plaintiff files an amended complaint that 

sufficiently alleges a basis for liability against him request 

waiver of service until 

2 - ORDER 

Case 2:16-cv-00683-MC Document 27 Filed 12/29/16 Page 2 of 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Coffey, Appellant.

The defendant was incorrectly sentenced as a second felony offender pursuant to Penal Law § 70.06. His predicate offense, a conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree under Penal Law § 265.02 (4), is a violent felony offense *(see,*Penal Law § 70.02 [1] [c]), as are the instant convictions of manslaughter in the first degree *(see,*Penal Law § 70.02 [1] [a]) and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree *(see,*Penal Law § 70.02 [1] [b]); thus, the defendant qualifies as a second violent felony offender *(see,*Penal Law § 70.04 [1] [a]). As Penal Law § 70.06 (1) (a), which defines the term "second felony offender”, excludes second *violent*felony offenders from its ambit, the defendant is correct in his contention that he should have been sentenced as a second violent felony offender pursuant to Penal Law § 70.04 *(see,*Hechtman, Supplementary Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 39, Penal Law § 70.06, p 217 [1986 Supp Pamph]; *see also, People v Weiss,*120 AD2d 180). However, since the defendant was the beneficiary of the error, no prejudice ensued to him. Therefore, this error does not require vacatur of the defendant’s sentence.

*815We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Mollen, P. J., Brown, Niehoff and Kooper, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [S-133-2021]

An application has been submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, grantee of FTZ 49, requesting subzone status for the facility of Getinge Group Logistics Americas LLC (GGLA), located in Dayton, New Jersey. The application was submitted pursuant to the provisions of the Foreign-Trade Zones Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), and the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400). It was formally docketed on September 2, 2021.

                    The proposed subzone (3.55 acres) is located at 2349 Route 130, Suite A,                           ( print page 50525)                        Dayton, New Jersey. No authorization for production activity has been requested at this time. The proposed subzone would be subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 49.                

In accordance with the FTZ Board's regulations, Christopher Kemp of the FTZ Staff is designated examiner to review the application and make recommendations to the Executive Secretary.

                    Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions shall be addressed to the FTZ Board's Executive Secretary and sent to:                     *ftz@trade.gov.*                     The closing period for their receipt is October 19, 2021. Rebuttal comments in response to material submitted during the foregoing period may be submitted during the subsequent 15-day period to November 3, 2021.                

                    A copy of the application will be available for public inspection in the “Online FTZ Information Section” section of the FTZ Board's website, which is accessible via                     *www.trade.gov/​ftz.*

                    For further information, contact Christopher Kemp at                     *Christopher.Kemp@trade.gov.*

Dated: September 2, 2021.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2021-19404 Filed 9-8-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
EXHIBIT 31.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14 AND 15d-14
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Carl Gruenler, Chief Executive Officer of US Global Nanospace, Inc. (the
"Company"), certify that:

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of US Global Nanospace,
Inc.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in the report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for,
the periods, presented in the report.

The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under my our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which the periodic report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Company's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting; and

The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company's
auditors and to the audit committee of the Company's board of directors (or
persons fulfilling the equivalent function):

(i) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

(ii) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting.


                        Dated: March 22, 2006

                        /s/ Carl Gruenler
                        -----------------------
                        Carl Gruenler
                        Chief Executive Officer