alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Flaming Gorge Technical Working Group

Meeting Notes

Monday, May 29, 2018

Attendees: Jed Parker, Heather Patno, Ashley, Nielsen, Don Anderson, Tom Chart, Matt and 

Randy, Dan Schaad, Peter Crookston

1. Hydrology summary: 

a. Yampa not falling out as quickly as was forecast on the previous Friday. Flows 

will continue to put water into Stuart Lake along with larvae.

2. The short bypass release to 6,600 will be likely be reaching Stuart Lake within 48 hours, 

providing a pulse of flow to enhance operations.

Review of baseflows: 

1. Typically target 2,000 at Jensen when Pikeminnow emerge, early as June 15th, July 1st. 

2. Decreased below average baseflow, until target reached, then increase by 50 cfs until we 

get to target.

3. Dave – Tom, have overview of recovery program discussion to take place on June 28th.
Order entered August 29, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01150-CV

IN RE RAMIRO CHAPA, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 203rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F04-36350-P

ORDER

Based on the Court’s order of today’s date, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus. We ORDER that relator bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
#### Mary Atwood et al. *v.*Regional School District No. 15 et al.

*Thomas L. Brayton,*in support of the motion.

*Kenneth H. Murray,*in opposition.

Submitted April 21

decided May 6, 1975

The motion by the named defendant to expedite the appeal from the Superior Court for the judicial district of Waterbury is denied.
Melvin Richardson, Petitioner,
v. J.D. Whitehead, Respondent.'UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) 

### ) ) ) 

### ) ) ) ) Civil ActionNo.

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

# FILED SEP 162009 Clerk, U.S. District and 

### Bankruptcy Courts 

# 09 1758

This action, brought

### pro se, is before the Court onthe petitioner's application for a writ of 

### habeas corpus, accompanied by an application to proceed 

### informapauperis. The Court will grant the application to proceed 

### informapauperis and will dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction. Petitioner is a prisoner at the Federal Correctional Institution in Cumberland, Maryland. He challenges ajudgment ofconviction entered bythe Superior Court ofthe District of Columbia following his plea ofguilty. 

### See Pet. at 1. Although petitioner has submitted a form petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, it is established that challenges to a Superior Courtjudgment of conviction must be pursued in that court under D.C. Code § 23-110, 

### see Blair-Bey v. 

### Quick, 151 F.3d 1036, 1042-43 (D.C. Cir. 1998); 

### Byrdv. Henderson, 119 F.3d 34, 36-37 (D.C. Cir. 1997), and that absent a showing ofan inadequate or ineffective local remedy, "aDistrict ofColumbia prisoner has no recourse to a federaljudicial forum." 

### Garris v. 

### Lindsay, 794 F.2d 722, 726 (D.C. Cir. 1986), 

### cert. denied, 479 U.S. 993 (1986) (internal footnote omitted). Under District of Columbia law, [an] application for a writ ofhabeas corpus in behalfofa prisoner who is authorized to 

# 3apply for reliefby motionpursuant to this section shall not be entertained by
... any Federal
... court ifit appears ...that the Superior Court has denied him relief, unless it also appears that the remedy by motion is inadequate or ineffective to test the legality ofhis detention. D.C. Code §23-110(g). The Superior Court and the D.C. Court ofAppeals have entertained petitioner's collateral challenges to his conviction. 

### See Pet. at 3-4. Petitioner's lack ofsuccess in the local courts, however, does not render the local remedy inadequate orineffective, 

### see Garris
v. 

### Lindsay, 794 F.2d at 727; 

### Charles v. 

### Chandler, 180 F.3d 753, 756-58 (6th Cir. 1999) (citing cases), and petitionerhas provided no other basis for finding the local remedy inadequate. This Court therefore lacks authority to entertainthe petition. A separate Orderofdismissal accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.



### Date: September

# ~09 . United States District Judge

2
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Altair Nanotechnologies Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as amended
and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, Terry Copeland, President of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/  Terry
Copeland


Terry
Copeland


President


March 14,
2008
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 22

- 30358 Summary Calendar

**____________ Arthur Ray Robinson,** 

Petitioner

— Appellant **,**

versus **Jerry Goodwin,** Warden, David Wade Correctional Center **,** Respondent

— Appellee

**.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 5:22

- CV

- 941

**_____________ _________________**  Before **Stewart, Willett,** and **Douglas,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** Arthur Ray Robinson, Louisiana prisoner #42 5 796, seeks appointment of counsel in this appeal of a denial of his motion to appoint counsel in a habeas proceeding

. Because we lack jurisdiction, we dismiss the appeal.

**_____________________**

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir . R.**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 11, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-30358 Document: 00516606355 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/11/2023No. 22

- 30358

2 We must examine our jurisdiction sua sponte. See Mosley v. Cozby , 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). The re has been no final judgment . T he order denyin g appointment of counsel is not specified in 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a) and has not been certified for appeal . Therefore , we may consider it only if it falls within that “small class of orders” deemed final under the collateral order doctrine. See Dardar v. Lafou rche Realty Co. , 849 F.2d 955, 957

- 58 (5th Cir. 1988). It does not. See Thomas v. Scott , 47 F.3d 713, 715 (5th Cir. 1995). Thus, we lack jurisdiction over the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is **DISMISSED** , and the motion for appointment of counsel is **DENIED** as moot

. Case: 22-30358 Document: 00516606355 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/11/2023
#### In re SNYDER. In the matter of final judicial settlement of the accounts of Garrett B. Snyder as executor of the last will and testament of Edward J. Strout, deceased.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 14, 1896.)

No opinion. Motion to dismiss the appeal denied, without costs. All concur.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12


                        ITT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
             CALCULATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO TOTAL FIXED CHARGES
                              (MILLIONS OF DOLLARS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  THREE MONTHS
                                                                 ENDED MARCH 31,
                                                                 ---------------
                                                                 1997      1996
                                                                 -----     -----
<S>                                                              <C>       <C>
Earnings:
Net Income ..................................................    $  80     $  20
Add:
  Adjustment for undistributed equity earnings and losses (a)       (3)       --
  Income taxes ..............................................       57        15
  Minority equity in net income .............................       (1)       (1)
  Amortization of interest capitalized ......................        1         1
                                                                 -----     -----
                                                                   134        35
                                                                 -----     -----
Fixed Charges:
  Interest and other financial charges ......................       61        83
  Interest factor attributable to rentals (b) ...............        6         7
                                                                 -----     -----
                                                                    67        90
                                                                 -----     -----
Earnings, as adjusted .......................................    $ 201     $ 125
                                                                 =====     =====

Fixed Charges:
  Fixed charges above .......................................    $  67     $  90
  Interest capitalized ......................................        4         1
                                                                 -----     -----
  Total fixed charges .......................................    $  71     $  91
                                                                 =====     =====

Ratio:

  Earnings, as adjusted, to total fixed charges .............     2.83      1.37
                                                                 =====     =====
</TABLE>

Notes:

a)   The adjustment for undistributed equity earnings and losses represents the
     elimination from income of both undistributed earnings and losses of
     companies in which at least 20% but less than 50% equity is owned.

b)   The interest factor attributable to rentals consists of one third of rental
     charges, deemed by the Corporation to be representative of the interest
     factor inherent in rents.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           3,105
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              10
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 5,700
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          16,651
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            16,727
<LOANS>                                        107,083
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (1,076)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 139,472
<DEPOSITS>                                     119,831
<SHORT-TERM>                                     4,500
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,681
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        552
<COMMON>                                         9,075
<OTHER-SE>                                       (771)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 139,472
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  6,388
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  658
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    44
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 7,090
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,135
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,226
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,864
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      375
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    165
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         165
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        95
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   0.077
<LOANS-NON>                                        705
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               (1,054)
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      353
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              (1,076)
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           (1,076)
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            242
        

</TABLE>
#### Raman Mann, an Infant, by His Guardian ad Litem, George S. Akst, et al., Respondents, v Cooper Tire Company et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Submitted January 29, 2007;

decided May 1, 2007

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements *[see*7 NY3d 718].
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to the best of my knowledge; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by
the Report and results of operations for the Company for the period covered by the
Report.
 Dated: February 8, 2006/s/ Godfrey R. SullivanGodfrey R. SullivanChief Executive Officer
COLO RIVER BELOW GRAND VALLEY DIV NR PALISADE, COLatitude: 39.099Longitude: -108.355Elevation: 4670

COLO RIVER BELOW GRAND VALLEY DIV NR PALISADE, CO

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Middle Fork Camp Site Page...



Middle Fork Camp

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Arapaho Ridge Site Page...



Arapaho Ridge

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Never Summer Site Page...



Never Summer

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Mccoy Park Site Page...



Mccoy Park

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Beaver Ck Village Site Page...



Beaver Ck Village

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Bear River Site Page...



Bear River

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Chapman Tunnel Site Page...



Chapman Tunnel

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Elliot Ridge Site Page...



Elliot Ridge

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Upper Taylor Site Page...



Upper Taylor

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Fool Creek Site Page...



Fool Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to High Lonesome Site Page...



High Lonesome

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Sawtooth Site Page...



Sawtooth

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Arrow Site Page...



Arrow

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Bear Lake Site Page...



Bear Lake

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Berthoud Summit Site Page...



Berthoud Summit

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Bison Lake Site Page...



Bison Lake

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Brumley Site Page...



Brumley

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Burro Mountain Site Page...



Burro Mountain

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Columbine Site Page...



Columbine

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Copper Mountain Site Page...



Copper Mountain

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Fremont Pass Site Page...



Fremont Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Grizzly Peak Site Page...



Grizzly Peak

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Hoosier Pass Site Page...



Hoosier Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Independence Pass Site Page...



Independence Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Ivanhoe Site Page...



Ivanhoe

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Kiln Site Page...



Kiln

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Lake Irene Site Page...



Lake Irene

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Loveland Basin Site Page...



Loveland Basin

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Lynx Pass Site Page...



Lynx Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Mc Clure Pass Site Page...



Mc Clure Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Mesa Lakes Site Page...



Mesa Lakes

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Nast Lake Site Page...



Nast Lake

Courtesy NRCS - Go to North Lost Trail Site Page...



North Lost Trail

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Overland Res. Site Page...



Overland Res.

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Park Reservoir Site Page...



Park Reservoir

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Phantom Valley Site Page...



Phantom Valley

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Schofield Pass Site Page...



Schofield Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Stillwater Creek Site Page...



Stillwater Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Summit Ranch Site Page...



Summit Ranch

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Vail Mountain Site Page...



Vail Mountain

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Willow Creek Pass Site Page...



Willow Creek Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Buffalo Park Site Page...



Buffalo Park

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Jackwhacker Gulch Site Page...



Jackwhacker Gulch

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Michigan Creek Site Page...



Michigan Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Jones Pass Site Page...



Jones Pass
Exhibit 32.1 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Entheos Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on the Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Harmel S. Rayat, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (i) the Report filed by the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) The information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.  ENTHEOS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.Date:  March 28, 2008By:/s/ Harmel S. RayatHarmel S. Rayat
President and Chief Executive Officer  This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.10

                             LCC INTERNATIONAL, INC.

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 3
                                       TO
                             LCC INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                         1996 EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTION PLAN

                             (THE "AMENDMENT NO. 3")

       LCC International, Inc. (the "Corporation") hereby amends the terms of
the LCC International, Inc. 1996 Employee Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") as
follows:

       1. Section 3.1 entitled "Committee " is amended to authorize the
delegation of authority under the Plan by the Committee to a one person
committee of the Board of Directors by the addition of a new sentence at the end
of Section 3.1 as follows:

       To the extent permitted by law, the Committee may delegate its authority
       under the Plan to a single member committee of the Board of Directors.

       2. The reference to "4,725,000" in the second sentence of Section 4 of
the Plan is replaced by "5,225,000".

                                      * * *

       This Amendment No. 3 was duly adopted and approved by the Board of
Directors of the Corporation on December 16, 1999.

                                            /s/ Peter A. Deliso
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            Vice President, General Counsel
                                            and Secretary
# L_2009207DE.01001501.xml

| 11.8.2009 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 207/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2009

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 207/15

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 583/2009 der Kommission vom 3. Juli 2009 zur Eintragung einer Bezeichnung in das Verzeichnis der geschützten Ursprungsbezeichnungen und der geschützten geografischen Angaben (Aceto Balsamico di Modena (g.g.A.))

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 175 vom 4. Juli 2009
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 175 vom 4. Juli 2009

Seite 8, Erwägungsgrund 10, letzter Satz:

anstatt:

„Die einzelnen geografischen Begriffe der zusammengesetzten Bezeichnung, auch wenn diese zusammen verwendet werden, sowie ihre Übersetzung, können unter Einhaltung der Grundsätze und Vorschriften des Gemeinschaftsrechts im gesamten Gebiet der Gemeinschaft verwendet werden.“

muss es heißen:

„Die einzelnen nichtgeografischen Begriffe der zusammengesetzten Bezeichnung, auch wenn diese zusammen verwendet werden, sowie ihre Übersetzung, können unter Einhaltung der Grundsätze und Vorschriften des Gemeinschaftsrechts im gesamten Gebiet der Gemeinschaft verwendet werden.“

---
Exhibit 32.2

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
                      As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
                         the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June
30, 2006 of Integrated BioPharma, Inc. (the "Company") as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Dina L.
Masi, the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Integrated
BioPharma, Inc. (the "Company"), certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to her knowledge:

(3)      the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
         78m or 78o(d)); and

(4)      the information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
         material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of
         operations of the Company.

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Acot of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: September 28, 2006             By: /s/ Dina L.Masi
                                     -------------------
                                     Name: Dina L. Masi
                                     Title: Senior Vice President &
                                     Chief Financial Officer