alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Shawn CHANDLER, John Bryant, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellants, v. Steve STOUTE and Arnell Group Inc, Defendant-Appellee, Reebok Int’l Ltd., Defendant-Counterclaimant-Appellee, *28Pass Entertainment LLC, Peter Arnell, Defendants.

Nos. 05-4796-cv(L), 05-6447-cv(CON).

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

April 4, 2007.

Edward J. Bardelli, Warner Norcross *&*Judd, LLP, Grand Rapids, MI, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

David C. Burger, Robinson Brog Leinwand Greene Genovese *&*Gluck P.C., New York, NY, for Defendant>-Appellee Steve Stoute.

Fredric S. Newman, Hoguet Newman & Regal, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Edward P. Boyle, on brief), for Defendants-Appellees Reebok International Ltd. and Arnell Group, Inc.

Present: Hon. WALKER, Hon. ROBERT D. SACK, and Hon. RICHARD C. WESLEY, Circuit Judges.

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiffs-appellants Shawn Chandler and John Bryant appeal a judgment of the District Court granting summary judgment against them and dismissing their claims. They also appeal an order of the district court granting defendant-appellee Steve Stoute attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of $7,392.00 and another order granting defendant-appellee Arnell Group, Inc. (“Arnell”) and defendant-appellee Reebok International, Ltd. (“Reebok”) attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of $17,983.20 with interest.

. Familiarity by the parties is assumed as to the facts, the procedural context, and the specification of appellate issues.

Finding there to be no genuine issues of material fact existing in this case, we affirm the summary judgment granted by the district court.

However, upon review of the record we do not agree with the district court that the plaintiffs’ copyright infringement claim was objectively unreasonable. *See Fogerty v. Fantasy,*510 U.S. 517, 534 n. 19, 114 S.Ct. 1023, 127 L.Ed.2d 455 (1994) (suggesting several non exclusive factors, including objective unreasonableness, that courts should consider in making awards of attorneys’ fees to a prevailing party). We therefore reverse the attorneys’ fees *29and costs awarded pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 505.1

Further, we deny the additional attorneys’ fees requested by Reebok and Arnell arising from this appeal.

Accordingly, for the reasons set forth above, the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part.

1

. Our review of the record suggests that the district court's full award of $7,392.00 to Stoute and $14,201.19 of the award to Reebok and Arnell were pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 505.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1763 

To provide for the minimum size of crews of freight trains, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 13, 2015 

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To provide for the minimum size of crews of freight trains, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safe Freight Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. FREIGHT TRAIN CREW SIZE. 

6 (a) AMENDMENT.—Subchapter II of chapter 201 of 

7 title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 

8 end the following new section: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1763 IH

1 ‘‘§ 20168. Freight train crew size 

2 ‘‘Effective 30 days after the date of enactment of the 

3 Safe Freight Act, no freight train or light engine used in 

4 connection with the movement of freight may be operated 

5 unless it has a crew consisting of at least 2 individuals, 

6 one of whom is certified under regulations promulgated 

7 by the Federal Railroad Administration as a locomotive 

8 engineer pursuant to section 20135, and the other of 

9 whom is certified under regulations promulgated by the 

10 Federal Railroad Administration as a conductor pursuant 

11 to section 20163.’’. 

12 (b) TABLE OF SECTIONS AMENDMENT.—The table of 

13 sections for chapter 201 of title 49, United States Code, 

14 is amended by adding at the end the following new item: 

‘‘20168. Freight train crew size.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
SAs INPUT ON SPG PR

SAs INPUT ON SPG PR

AND AMP SCIENCE P

AND AMP SCIENCE P

PLANNING PROCESS PLANNING PROCESSSCIENCE PLANS SCIENCE PLANSSCIENCE INDEPENDENCE SCIENCE INDEPENDENCE 

BY

L. D. GARRETT, L. D. GARRETT, 

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY 

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY 
SPG PLANNING PRO

 IMPOVERMENT OVER INDEPE

HAND-OFF ASSESSMENTS OSCIENTISTS/MANAGERS

 REQUIRES TECHNICAL EXPE

TECHNICAL KNOWLEDGE OF 

 NEEDS SCIENTIST/MANAGER 

COLLABORATION AND ACCOAS JOINT PRODUCT

 SHOULD RESTRUCTURE SPG 

MORE EFFICIENT
STRATEGIC SCIENCE PL

STRATEGIC SCIENCE PL

• STRATEGIC OPERATIONS PLAN (1 STRATEGIC OPERATIONS PLAN (1S

NOT SUFFICIENT BUT COULD BE S

NOT SUFFICIENT BUT COULD BE S

DOCUMENT DOCUMENT

• FINAL STRATEGIC SCIENCE PLAN A

FINAL STRATEGIC SCIENCE PLAN A

• IMPROVEMENTS CLARIFY GENERA

IMPROVEMENTS CLARIFY GENERA

STRATEGIES AND OUTCOMES FRO

STRATEGIES AND OUTCOMES FRO

CONTINUED PLANNING CONTINUED PLANNING

• DEVELOP FOCUSED SCIENCE QUES

DEVELOP FOCUSED SCIENCE QUES

AROUND MANAGERS PRIORITY PR

AROUND MANAGERS PRIORITY PR
MONITORING AND RES

MONITORING AND RES

PLAN

 GREATER SPECIFICITY OF P

GREATER SPECIFICITY OF P

FOR ADDRESSING NEEDED P

FOR ADDRESSING NEEDED P

IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENTS

 MORE FOCUSED SCIENCE Q

MORE FOCUSED SCIENCE Q

DIRECTED TO TIMELY RESEA

DIRECTED TO TIMELY RESEA

ACCOMPLISHMENT ACCOMPLISHMENT

 IMPROVED PROGRAM INTEG

IMPROVED PROGRAM INTEG

LINKAGE LINKAGE
ANNUAL WORK PLAN 

ANNUAL WORK PLAN 

BUDGET

 IMPROVED METHODS FOR 

IMPROVED METHODS FOR 

AND INTEGRATION OF PRO

AND INTEGRATION OF PRO

ELEMENTS ELEMENTS

 GUIDANCE ON OUT YEAR GUIDANCE ON OUT YEAR 

EXTENSION OF CURRENT EXTENSION OF CURRENT PROGRAMS TO GAIN RESO

PROGRAMS TO GAIN RESO

SOLUTIONS SOLUTIONS 
EXPERIMENTAL OPT

EXPERIMENTAL OPT

HYDROPOWER ECONOMIC I

HYDROPOWER ECONOMIC I

ASSESSMENTS ASSESSMENTS

 IMPROVED SPECIFICATION OF M

IMPROVED SPECIFICATION OF M

 IMPROVED CLARIFICATION OF H

IMPROVED CLARIFICATION OF H

SELECTED METHODS AFFECT OU

SELECTED METHODS AFFECT O

 IMPROVED CLARIFICATION OF D

IMPROVED CLARIFICATION OF D

IMPACTS OF OPTIONS IMPACTS OF OPTIONS
EXPERIMENTAL OPTIONS EXPERIMENTAL OPTIONS 

BIOPHYSICAL/SOCIO BIOPHYSICAL/SOCIO

-CULTU

CULTU

IMPACT ASSESSMENTS IMPACT ASSESSMENTS

 IMPROVED SPECIFICATION 

IMPROVED SPECIFICATION 

METHODS METHODS

 CONSISTENCY OF STATEM

CONSISTENCY OF STATEM

RELATED TO DIFFERING R

RELATED TO DIFFERING R

IMPACTS IMPACTS

 POTENTIAL INTERGRATED 

POTENTIAL INTERGRATED 

OF FLOW AND NON OF FLOW AND NON

-FLOW 

FLOW 
SCIENCE INDEPENDANC

SCIENCE INDEPENDANC

• SAs AND EXECUTIVE SECRETARY S

AND EXECUTIVE SECRETARY S

CONSTANTLY EVALUATE THEIR IN

CONSTANTLY EVALUATE THEIR IN

IN REVIEW AND ADVISORY SERVIC

IN REVIEW AND ADVISORY SERVIC

• CHANGING CHANGING SAs ON 3 TO 5 YEAR S

ON 3 TO 5 YEAR S

ASSISTS IN INDEPENDENT THOUG

ASSISTS IN INDEPENDENT THOUG

PERSPECTIVES PERSPECTIVES

• ABILITY FOR ACCESS TO OTHER S

ABILITY FOR ACCESS TO OTHER S

IS IMPORTANT (ECONOMICS) IS IMPORTANT (ECONOMICS)
IIB 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1949 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2015 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT 

To provide for the consideration and submission of site and 

design proposals for the National Liberty Memorial approved for establishment in the District of Columbia. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1949 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Liberty Me3 morial Clarification Act of 2015’’. 

4 SEC. 2. COMPLIANCE WITH CERTAIN STANDARDS FOR COM5 MEMORATIVE WORKS IN ESTABLISHMENT OF 

6 NATIONAL LIBERTY MEMORIAL. 

7 Section 2860(c) of the Military Construction Author8 ization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 

9 112–239; 40 U.S.C. 8903 note) is amended by striking 

10 the period at the end and inserting the following: ‘‘, except 

11 that, under subsections (a)(2) and (b) of section 8905, the 

12 Secretary of Agriculture, rather than the Secretary of the 

13 Interior or the Administrator of General Services, shall be 

14 responsible for the consideration of site and design pro15 posals and the submission of such proposals on behalf of 

16 the sponsor to the Commission of Fine Arts and National 

17 Capital Planning Commission.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 16, 

2015. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2009209EN.01000501.xml

| 4.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5593 — Nordea/Vegagest/Norvega)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 209/03

On 27 August 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5593. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5593. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Case 3:16-cv-00483-SI Document 8 Filed 03/23/16 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:16-cv-00483-SI Document 8 Filed 03/23/16 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:16-cv-00483-SI Document 8 Filed 03/23/16 Page 3 of 3
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 22

- 00103

- CV

Joseph Maurice Gilmore and Renee Le Doux Gilmore , Appellant s

v.

Kathy Kramer, John Woodworth, Sr., and Jessica Ricotta , Appellee s

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF BURNET COUNTY

N O

. 53106

, THE HONORABLE LINDA M. BAYLESS , JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant s Joseph Maurice Gilmore and Renee Le Doux Gilmore ha ve filed an

unopposed moti on to dismiss this appeal. We g rant appellant s ’ motion and dismi ss th e ap peal.

See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)

.

__________________________________________

Chari L . Kelly , Justice

Before Justices Baker, Kelly, a nd Theofanis

Dismissed on Appellant s ’ Motion

Filed: January 19, 2023
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JACOBUS RENTMEESTER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

NIKE, INC., an Oregon corporation,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 15-35509

D.C. No. 3:15-cv-00113-MO

District of Oregon, 

Portland

ORDER

Before: BERZON, WATFORD, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Appellant’s motions to take judicial notice (Dkt. Nos. 6, 32) are DENIED.

FILED

FEB 27 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
COLORADO RIVER NEAR KREMMLING, COLatitude: 40.037Longitude: -106.44Elevation: 7320

COLORADO RIVER NEAR KREMMLING, CO

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Middle Fork Camp Site Page...



Middle Fork Camp

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Arapaho Ridge Site Page...



Arapaho Ridge

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Never Summer Site Page...



Never Summer

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Elliot Ridge Site Page...



Elliot Ridge

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Fool Creek Site Page...



Fool Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to High Lonesome Site Page...



High Lonesome

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Sawtooth Site Page...



Sawtooth

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Arrow Site Page...



Arrow

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Bear Lake Site Page...



Bear Lake

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Berthoud Summit Site Page...



Berthoud Summit

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Columbine Site Page...



Columbine

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Copper Mountain Site Page...



Copper Mountain

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Fremont Pass Site Page...



Fremont Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Grizzly Peak Site Page...



Grizzly Peak

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Hoosier Pass Site Page...



Hoosier Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Lake Irene Site Page...



Lake Irene

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Loveland Basin Site Page...



Loveland Basin

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Phantom Valley Site Page...



Phantom Valley

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Stillwater Creek Site Page...



Stillwater Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Summit Ranch Site Page...



Summit Ranch

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Willow Creek Pass Site Page...



Willow Creek Pass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Buffalo Park Site Page...



Buffalo Park

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Jackwhacker Gulch Site Page...



Jackwhacker Gulch

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Michigan Creek Site Page...



Michigan Creek

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Jones Pass Site Page...



Jones Pass
No. 75-6893.

#### Vacendak *v.*Indiana.

Sup. Ct. Ind. Certiorari denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John L. Ives, Appellant.

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was convicted of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second and third degrees. Among several arguments raised on appeal, we need only address one: the adequacy of the court’s instructions to the jury on the defense of agency.

Reviewing the court’s instruction on the agency defense, we find it sufficient. Defendant requested that the court charge that receiving a tip, such as a small amount of cocaine, is not necessarily inconsistent with an agency defense. The court declined to so charge and, instead, instructed the jury that there were a number of factors involved in an agency defense and receipt of a benefit was merely one of them. The court further instructed that the key to the agency defense is whether the defendant acted out of an independent desire to promote the transactions. This charge was adequate.

Testifying in his own defense, defendant freely admitted his involvement in assisting the undercover agent in the purchase of cocaine. While rejecting an offer of money for his effort, defendant agreed to accept "a gram of rock off each ounce” for his own use. Under these circumstances, where defendant *976agreed to a continuing arrangement by which he would receive cocaine in return for his efforts, defendant was not entitled to a charge on the agency defense as a matter of law *(see, People v Lem Lek Chong,*45 NY2d 64, 76, *cert denied*439 US 935).

We have considered defendant’s other arguments raised on appeal and find no merit to them. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Egan, J. — criminal sale of controlled substance, second degree, and another offense.) Present— Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Pine and Lawton, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Xerion  EcoSolutions  Group Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date here of (the  "report"),  I, Ben
Traub,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in this Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated this 18th day of May, 2005.


 /s/ Ben Traub
---------------------------
Ben Traub
Principal Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                          68,933
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,419,870
<ALLOWANCES>                                   346,000
<INVENTORY>                                    662,989
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,188,957
<PP&E>                                       3,752,409
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,271,753)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,723,463
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,056,379
<BONDS>                                      1,595,269
<COMMON>                                        71,815
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,723,463
<SALES>                                      8,762,518
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,762,518
<CGS>                                        7,257,056
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,731,530
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                97,095
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (201,627)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (323,163)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (323,163)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (323,163)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)
        

</TABLE>
Page 1 - STIPULATED GENERAL JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL

SWANSON, LATHEN, PRESTWICH, PC 

Attorneys at Law 

3040 Commercial Street SE, Suite 200 

Salem, Oregon 97302 

T: 503.581.2421 F: 503.588.7179

Travis S. Prestwich, OSB No. 003617 

Email: tprestwich@slamlaw.com

Swanson, Lathen, Prestwich, PC 

3040 Commercial St. SE, Ste. 200 

Salem, OR 97302 

T: 503-581-2421 

F: 503-588-7179 

Of Attorneys for Plaintiffs Mei Sansome, Shino and Lyla Sansome 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

DAIN SANSOME, MEI SANSOME, SHINO 

SANSOME, and LYLA SANSOME, 

 Plaintiffs, 

v.

GLENN FAIRALL, CITY OF ALBANY, 

MATTHEW STARK, and STATE OF 

OREGON,

Defendants. 

Case No. 6:15-cv-02267-AA 

STIPULATED GENERAL JUDGMENT

OF DISMISSAL

The claims by all Plaintiffs against all Defendants, and by all Defendants against all 

Plaintiffs, have voluntarily been resolved and, therefore, the parties hereby stipulate to a 

complete dismissal of this matter with prejudice and without attorney fees or costs to any party. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED: 

SWANSON LATHEN PRESTWICH PC 

 /s/ Travis S. Prestwich 

By: 

Travis S. Prestwich, OSB No. 003617 

Attorney for Plaintiffs Mei, Shino & Lyla 

Sansome 

Dated: April 21, 2020 

KRAEMER & LEWIS 

/s/ Steve Kraemer 

By: 

Steve Kraemer, OSB No. 104017 

Attorneys for Defendants

Dated: April 20, 2020

Case 6:15-cv-02267-AA Document 61 Filed 04/22/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 - STIPULATED GENERAL JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL 

SWANSON, LATHEN, PRESTWICH, PC 

Attorneys at Law 

3040 Commercial Street SE, Suite 200 

Salem, Oregon 97302 

T: 503.581.2421 F: 503.588.7179 

BIRCH TREE LAW, PC

/s/ Joseph D. Smith 

_________________________

Joseph D. Smith

OSB No. 111418

Of Attorneys for Plaintiff Dain Sansome

Dated: April 20, 2020 

Based on the stipulation of the parties above, the Court hereby dismisses this matter with 

prejudice and without attorney fees or costs to any party. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ________________, 2020. 

The Honorable Ann Aiken 

April 22

/s/Ann Aiken

U.S. District Judge

Case 6:15-cv-02267-AA Document 61 Filed 04/22/20 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with thereport of Impac Mortgage Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned,in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

 

(1)                       The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Joseph R. Tomkinson |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Joseph R. Tomkinson     |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |
| September 15, 2008 |   |

 
| /s/ Todd R. Taylor               |   |
|----------------------------------|--------|
| Todd R. Taylor                   |   |
| Interim Chief Financial  Officer |   |
| September 15, 2008          |   |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ImpacMortgage Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Impac Mortgage Holdings, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
EXHIBIT 32

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                          OF US GLOBAL NANOSPACE, INC.
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section.1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) each of the
undersigned officers of US Global Nanospace, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby
certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

(a) The quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005
of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(b) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b) Information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                            Dated: November 23, 2005

                            /s/ Carl Gruenler
                            -----------------------
                            Carl Gruenler,
                            Chief Executive Officer

                            /s/ Julie Seaman
                            -----------------------
                            Julie Seaman,
                            Chief Financial Officer