alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1861 

To stop motorcycle checkpoint funding, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 16, 2015 

Mr. SENSENBRENNER (for himself, Mr. RIBBLE, Mr. YOUNG of Alaska, Mr. 

WEBER of Texas, Mr. RYAN of Wisconsin, Mr. WALBERG, Ms. HERRERA

BEUTLER, and Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To stop motorcycle checkpoint funding, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Motorcycle 

5 Checkpoint Funding Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. GRANT RESTRICTION. 

7 The Secretary of Transportation may not provide a 

8 grant or any funds to a State, county, town, or township, 

9 Indian tribe, municipal or other local government to be 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1861 IH

1 used for any program to check helmet usage or create 

2 checkpoints for an operator of motorcycle or passenger on 

3 a motorcycle. 

4 SEC. 3. MOTORCYCLE SAFETY. 

5 Section 153 of title 23, United States Code, is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) in the section heading by striking ‘‘and 

8 motorcycle helmets’’; 

9 (2) in subsection (a) by striking ‘‘such fiscal 

10 year—’’ and everything that follows through ‘‘(2) a 

11 law’’ and inserting ‘‘such fiscal year a law’’; 

12 (3) in subsection (b) by striking ‘‘State laws’’ 

13 each place it appears and inserting ‘‘a State law’’; 

14 and 

15 (4) in subsection (f) by amending paragraphs 

16 (2) and (3) to read as follows: 

17 ‘‘(2) SECOND-YEAR GRANTS.—A State is eligi18 ble for a grant under this section in a fiscal year 

19 succeeding the first fiscal year in which a State re20 ceives a grant under this section only if the State in 

21 the preceding fiscal year had in effect at all times 

22 a State law described in subsection (a) and achieved 

23 a rate of compliance with such law of not less than 

24 50 percent. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1861 IH

1 ‘‘(3) THIRD-YEAR GRANTS.—A State is eligible 

2 for a grant under this section in a fiscal year suc3 ceeding the second fiscal year in which a State re4 ceives a grant under this section only if the State in 

5 the preceding fiscal year had in effect at all times 

6 a State law described in subsection (a) and achieved 

7 a rate of compliance with such law of not less than 

8 70 percent.’’. 

9 SEC. 4. HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAMS. 

10 Section 402(a)(2)(A) of title 23, United States Code, 

11 is amended by striking clause (iv) and inserting the fol12 lowing: 

13 ‘‘(iv) to prevent accidents in order to 

14 reduce injuries and deaths resulting from 

15 accidents involving motor vehicles and mo16 torcycles;’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# L_2010163DE.01004301.xml

| 30.6.2010 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 163/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2010

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 163/43

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 245/2009 der Kommission vom 18. März 2009 zur Durchführung der Richtlinie 2005/32/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates im Hinblick auf die Festlegung von Anforderungen an die umweltgerechte Gestaltung von Leuchtstofflampen ohne eingebautes Vorschaltgerät, Hochdruckentladungslampen sowie Vorschaltgeräte und Leuchten zu ihrem Betrieb und zur Aufhebung der Richtlinie 2000/55/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 76 vom 24. März 2009
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 76 vom 24. März 2009

Seite 27, Anhang, Abschnitt 1.1 Punkt B:

anstatt:

„Die Anforderungen, die in der ersten Stufe nur für Zweisockel-Leuchtstofflampen mit 26 mm Durchmesser (T8) gelten, gelten nun für alle Zweisockel-Leuchtstofflampen anderen Durchmessers.“

muss es heißen:

„Die Anforderungen, die in der ersten Stufe für Zweisockel-Leuchtstofflampen mit 26 mm Durchmesser (T8) gelten, gelten für alle Zweisockel-Leuchtstofflampen mit anderen Durchmessern als jene, die in der erste Stufe erfasst wurden.“

---
EXHIBIT 32

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                          OF US GLOBAL NANOSPACE, INC.
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section.1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) each of the
undersigned officers of US Global Nanospace, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby
certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

(a) The quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended September 30,
2005 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b) Information contained in the Form 10-QSB/A fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                        Dated: March 22, 2006

                        /s/ Carl Gruenler
                        -----------------------
                        Carl Gruenler,
                        Chief Executive Officer


                        /s/ Kevin Cronin
                        -----------------------
                        Kevin Cronin,
                        Chief Financial Officer
#### Mitchell B. Stock *v.*John W. Cobb et al.

*Allan M. Cane,*in support of the motion.

Submitted March 27

decided April 8, 1975

The motion by the defendants William and Constance Whitehead to stay proceedings in the Superior Court pending the outcome of their appeal from that court in Fairfield County at Stamford is denied.
Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program 

Technical Work Group Meeting, August 2-3, 2006 

Final Agenda - August 2, 2006

START 

TIME TOPIC, PRESENTER, and PURPOSE MATERIALS / 

TABS

10 a.m. Welcome and Administrative: Kurt Dongoske 

Information, discussion, and possible action 

1. Introductions and Determination of Quorum (16 members) 

2. Approval of May 24-25, 2006, Meeting Minutes 

3. Review of Action Items 

4. Old / New Business 

• CRAHG Report - Mary Barger 

• TWG Comments/Response to GCMRC Process 

• 5-year review of AMWG Strategic Plan 

• TWG Chair Nomination in September 

Agenda 

Minutes 

Action Items 

10:50 Secretary’s Designee June 16, 2006 memo - Dave Garrett Memo 

11:15 Organic Drift Studies - Ted Kennedy 

11:40 Near-shore Temperature Measurements - Craig Anderson 

12:00 Near-shore Biological Sampling - Barbara Ralston 

Reports 

12:30 

L U N C H 

1:25 p.m. Recent findings related to YOY trout survival in the Glen Canyon 

Reach - Josh Korman 

2:05 Downstream Temperature Modeling Update - Scott Wright

2:25 Sand Transport uspended Sediment Transport - Scott Wright 

Reports 

2:45 FY07 Hydrograph - John Hamill 

• SPG recommendations 

• Discussion 

FY07 

Hydrograph 

3:05 B R E A K 

3:15 FY07 Budget and Workplan - Dennis Kubly and John Hamill 

• MRP overview—how the FY 07 budget support the 5 year 

plan 

• BOR Budget overview - Dennis Kubly 

• GCMRC Budget overview (Hamill, program managers) 

Budget 

4:55 Public Comment 

5 p.m. Wrap up and Adjourn 
 

Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program 

Technical Work Group Meeting, August 2-3, 2006 

Final Agenda - August 3, 2006 

START 

TIME TOPIC, PRESENTER, and PURPOSE MATERIALS / 

TABS

8 a.m. Welcome and Administrative: Kurt Dongoske 

Information, discussion, and possible action 

8:12 a.m. Mapping on Submerged Aquatic Vegetation Mapping - Ted Kennedy 

8:40 a.m. Update on Terrestrial Vegetation Mapping and Monitoring - 

Barbara Ralston 

Reports 

9:15 a.m. Ancillary Projects by other Stakeholders - Dennis Kubly Budget 

9:50 a.m. NPS HBC Translocation presentation - NPS / GCWC Reports 

10:15 B R E A K 

10:35 a.m. FY 07 Hydrograph Budget and Workplan 

• SPG Recommendation - Dave Garrett 

• Reclamation - Dennis Kubly 

• GCMRC 

• Physical Resources - Ted Melis 

• Biological Program - Matthew Andersen 

• Cultural - Helen Fairley 

• Administration/Program Management (JD Kite/J. Hamill) 

Budget 

10:40 FY07 Hydrograph, Budget and Workplan Recommendation 

TWG Recommendation - Kurt Dongoske 

Budget 

12 noon L U N C H 

1 p.m. FY07 Hydrograph, Budget and Workplan Recommendation 

TWG Recommendation (Cont) - Kurt Dongoske 

1:30 Sediment PEP (reaffirm priority information needs) - Ted Melis and 

John O’Brien 

Sediment PEP 

2:00 MRP and Long Term Experimental Plan – John Hamill 

• Status

• Next Steps

Reports 

2:45 Public Comment 

3:10 p.m. Wrap up and Adjourn
CHANGE IN TERMS AGREEMENT



Borrower:         US Global Nanospace, Inc.          Lender:  USDR(NV), Inc.
                  f/k/a US Global Aerospace, Inc.
                  2533 N. Carson St., Suite 5107
                  Carson City, NV  89706

Principal:        Amounts up to $500,000.00          Interest Rate:    10.000%

Loan Date:        June 6, 2003

Maturity:         December 31, 2004

Date of Agreement:         December 30, 2004



                      DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING INDEBTEDNESS

A Revolving Promissory Note dated June 6, 2003 in original principal amounts up
to $125,000.00, increased for amounts up to $500,000.00 on June 11, 2004.

                         DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE IN TERMS

The maturity date of this Note is being extended to February 28, 2005. All other
terms and conditions remain unchanged.

                                 PROMISE TO PAY

US Global Nanospace, Inc. f/k/a US Global Aerospace, Inc., ("Borrower") promises
to pay to USDR(NV), Inc. ("Lender"), the principal balance then outstanding,
together with interest at the rate of 10.000% per annum on the unpaid principal
balance from June 6, 2003, until paid in full.

                                     PAYMENT

Borrower will pay these loans in one principal payment of the balance then
outstanding, plus interest on or before February 28, 2005. This payment due on
February 28, 2005 will be for all principal and all accrued interest not yet
paid. Unless otherwise agreed or required by applicable law, payments will be
applied first to any accrued unpaid interest, than to principal. Borrower may
pay without penalty all or a portion of the amount owed earlier than it is due.

                             SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS

This agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties,
their successors and assigns.




BORROWER:                                 LENDER:

US Global Nanospace, Inc.,                USDR(NV), Inc.
f/k/a US Global Aerospace, Inc.

By: /s/ John Robinson                     By: /s/ Julie Seaman
    -----------------                         ----------------
    John Robinson, Chairman                   Julie Seaman, Secretary
Drew L. Johnson 

Kathryn Tassinari 

sherwoodreese@comcast.net 

kathrynt50@comcast.net 

1700 Valley River Drive 

Eugene, OR 97401 

(541) 434-6466 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DENA R. DORSEY, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Commissioner of Social Security 

Administration, 

Defendant. 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

Civil No. 6:14-cv-01844-TC 

ORDER FOR ATTORNEY FEES 

PURSUANT TO EAJA 

After considering the Stipulated Motion of the parties submitted herein, Order hereby 

grants that Commissioner shall pay Plaintiff's attorney the sum of $4582.23 upon verification 

that Plaintiff has no debt to the government which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, 

pursuant to the reasoning in Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 130 S. Ct. 2521, 2527 (2010) (EAJA 

awards fees subject "to a federal administrative offset if the Litigant has outstanding federal 

debts") for full settlement of all claims for fees under EAJA. 

1 - ORDER FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO EAJA 

Case 6:14-cv-01844-TC Document 27 Filed 01/07/16 Page 1 of 2
If Plaintiff has no such federal debt, payment of $4582.23 shall be made to Plaintiff's 

attorney and mailed to his office at 1700 Valley River Drive, Eugene, OR 97401. If Plaintiff 

has such debt, the check for any remaining funds after offset shall be made out to Plaintiff and 

mailed to counsel's office at the address provided above. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this day of January _J_, 2016 

PRESENTED BY: 

By: /s/ DREW L. JOHNSON 

Drew L. Johnson, OSB #75200 

Of Attorneys for Plaintiff 

2 - ORDER FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO BAJA 

Case 6:14-cv-01844-TC Document 27 Filed 01/07/16 Page 2 of 2
#### In the Matter of Bernard J. Sorrentino, as Representative Broker of Ben’s Real Estate, Petitioner, v Gail S. Shaffer, as Secretary of State of the State of New York, Respondent.

— Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: The Hearing Officer found that petitioner, a licensed real estate broker, exhibited untrustworthiness and incompetence by failing to use a purchase offer form that properly advised the parties to seek legal advice before signing; by discouraging the purchasers from seeking legal assistance before signing; by failing to insert a sales contingency clause when he knew that such a clause was essential for protection of the buyers’ interests; by utilizing a form obligating either party to pay commissions if the sale was not consummated and then by enforcing that provision in a civil suit even though the sale fell through because he failed to negotiate an agreement with all of the proper contingencies. These findings are all supported by substantial evidence and warrant the determination that peti*957tioner engaged in untrustworthy conduct in violation of Real Property Law § 441-c *(see, Matter of Friedman v Paterson,*89 AD2d 701, *affd*58 NY2d 727; *Matter of Gudinsky v Cuomo,*64 AD2d 899; *Matter of Tucci v Department of State,*63 AD2d 835; *Matter of Duncan & Hill Realty v Department of State,*62 AD2d 690, *appeal dismissed*45 NY2d 821). We do not find petitioner’s 60-day suspension and further suspension pending repayment of $2,600 in commissions so disproportionate as to shock one’s sense of fairness *(Kostika v Cuomo,*41 NY2d 673; *Matter of Butterly & Green v Lomenzo,*36 NY2d 250). (Article 78 proceeding transferred by order of Supreme Court, Cayuga County, Contiguglia, J.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Green, Balio, Lawton and Schnepp, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1524

EMMA CURRY, Widow of Columbus Curry, deceased,

Petitioner,

versus

EASTERN ASSOCIATED COAL CORPORATION; DIRECTOR,

OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS,

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.

(98-622-BLA)

Submitted: August 31, 1999 Decided: September 23, 1999

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roger D. Forman, FORMAN & CRANE, L.C., Charleston, West Virginia,

for Petitioner. Mark E. Solomons, Laura Metcoff Klaus, ARTER &

HADDEN, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* We note that our recent decision in Double B. Mining, Inc.

v. Blankenship, 177 F.3d 240 (4th Cir. 1999), is dispositive of the

critical issues in this case.

2

PER CURIAM:

Emma Curry seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of

black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986

& Supp. 1999). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s

decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board.*

See Curry v. Eastern Assoc. Coal Corp., BRB No. 98-622-BLA (B.R.B.

Mar. 10, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

RACHEL KNIGHT, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL 

SECURITY, 

Defendant. 

MOSMAN,J., 

PORTLAND DIVISION 

No. 3:15·cv-02262-JE 

OPINION AND ORDER 

On July 26, 2017, Magistrate Judge John Jelderks issued his Findings and 

Recommendation ("F&R") [21 ], recommending that the Conunissioner's decision should be 

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings. Neither Defendant nor Plaintiff 

objected. 

DISCUSSION 

The magioirate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may 

file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge, 

but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to 

make a de novo determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or 

recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(C). However, the court 

is not required to review, de novo or imder any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of 

1 OPINION AND ORDER 
the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See 

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 

(9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny with which I am required to review the F&R depends 

on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject, or modify 

any part of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(C). 

Upon careful review, I agree with Judge Jelderks's recommendations and I ADOPT the 

F&R [21] as my own opinion. The Commissioner's decision is REVERSED and REMANDED 

for fmiher proceedings. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this JS_ --day of August, 2017. 

2 - OPINION AND ORDER
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Frederico Villanueva, Also Known as Federico Villanueva, Appellant.

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Levittan, J.), rendered on November 23, 1983, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sandler, Sullivan, Rosenberger and Wallach, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                          OF US GLOBAL NANOSPACE, INC.
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section.1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) each of the
undersigned officers of US Global Nanospace, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby
certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

            (a) The quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June
30, 2005 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (b) Information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  August 15, 2005


/s/ Carl Gruenler
-----------------------
Carl Gruenler,
Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Julie Seaman
-----------------------
Julie Seaman,
Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             817
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,652
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,342
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,928
<PP&E>                                             246<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,418
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,617
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            37
<OTHER-SE>                                         600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,418
<SALES>                                         24,581
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,581
<CGS>                                           16,316
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,316
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,886
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 268
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,379
<INCOME-TAX>                                       546
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                833
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       833
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .45
<FN>
<F1>Furniture and equipment, net
</FN>


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We herebyconsent to the incorporation by reference in Registration StatementsNos. 333-18981, 333-18983, 333-18985, 333-18987, 333-18989, 333-29153,333-63493, 333-36646, 333-46126, 333-67710, 333-133346 and 333-137569 and333-152349, all on Forms S-8 of SRS Labs, Inc., of our report dated February 23,2009, relating to our audits of the consolidated financial statements,financial statement schedule and internal control over financial reporting,which appear in SRS Labs, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for theyear ended December 31, 2008.

 

 

/s/ SQUAR, MILNER, PETERSON,MIRANDA & WILLIAMSON, LLP

 

Newport Beach, California

February 23, 2009

 

----