2010 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

4-16-2010

USA v. Morris

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 07-4258

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2010

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2010 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"USA v. Morris" (2010). 2010 Decisions. Paper 1496.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2010/1496
*

 Hon. Jane A. Restani, Chief Judge, United States Court of

International Trade, sitting by designation.

NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

 

No. 07-4258

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

DEBORAH MORRIS,

 Appellant

 

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. Crim. No. 0313-2 : 05-cr-00613)

District Judge: Hon. Lawrence F. Stengel

 

Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

April 12, 2010

Before: SLOVITER, NYGAARD, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI*

, Judge

(Filed April 16, 2010)

 

OPINION

SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.
2

Deborah Morris appeals from her convictions for health care fraud and mail fraud. 

I. 

Morris ran D.N. Morris and Associates, a company that provided health care

services to persons in and around the Philadelphia area. In 1997, she obtained Medicare

provider numbers for herself as an individual and for D.N. Morris and Associates by

submitting a false social security number, a false clinical social worker license, and by

falsely asserting that she had graduated from the University of Pennsylvania. Using those

provider numbers, over the next five years D.N. Morris and Morris submitted a total of

5,021 claims to Medicaid for services purportedly provided to fifty-nine beneficiaries. 

Several of these beneficiaries, however, testified at trial that they received no such

services. Some of the claims were for services supposedly performed after the purported

beneficiaries had already died. Indeed, the Government provided evidence that Morris

and D.N. Morris and Associates had not provided any services to any Medicare eligible

person. 

In 2002, the provider numbers for Morris and D.N. Morris were revoked. In 2005,

a grand jury indicted Morris on thirty-four counts of health care fraud in violation of 18

U.S.C. § 1347, fourteen counts of mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341, and one

count of making false statements in a health care proceeding in violation of 18 U.S.C. §

1035. A jury found Morris guilty of all charges and she was sentenced to sixty months in

prison followed by three years of supervised release. 

On appeal, Morris argues that her conviction for health care fraud and mail fraud
1

 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

3

should be overturned because there was insufficient evidence from which a jury could

conclude (1) that she was the party responsible for submitting the offending claims to

Medicare, or (2) that she participated in criminal activity with the requisite mental state to

warrant conviction. We agree with Morris’ argument that if her health care fraud

convictions are reversed, her mail fraud convictions, which stem from her receipt of

payments for false claims, must also be reversed.1

Morris asserts that the “government alleges, circumstantially, that appellant must

have been the person who submitted the claims because she was the person who ran the

company, completed the Medicare provider application and received a letter introducing

her to the electronic claims submission system.” Appellant’s Br. at 27. Despite this

assertion, as the government points out, there was significant testimony at trial, including

from Donna Royce-Morton, Morris’ daughter and the secretary/treasurer of D.N. Morris

and Associates, and Dr. Kimberly Walker, a psychiatrist who worked with D.N. Morris

and whose Medicare numbers were used to submit false claims, that it was Morris who

handled all of the billing for the company. A reasonable juror could conclude from this

and other record evidence that it was Morris who submitted the false claims. 

The requisite scienter for a violation of § 1347 is that defendant acted knowingly

and willfully. Morris argues that statements she made at a Medicare hearing – the same

hearing from which her conviction for making false statements in a health care
4

proceeding stems – reveal that “she was not familiar with the Medicare claims forms

which are used to bill Medicare for the provision of services,” and that this, coupled with

her “substantial admissions of noncompliance with the basic rules of the Medicare

program [are] indicative of a mind innocent of fraudulent intent.” Appellant’s Br. At 29. 

This is utterly unconvincing. Morris used false premises to obtain her Medicare number,

then submitted claims totaling $964,454.17 for which Medicare paid $278,507.05 for

services that were never provided, including services that she claimed were provided to

dead people. A juror could conclude from the number and egregiousness of the false

claims that Morris submitted the claims with intent to defraud the Medicare system.

II.

For the reasons stated above, we will affirm Morris’ convictions.