alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 The HONORABLE JEAN C. HAMILTON, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 01-3331

___________ Norman Banks, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Eastern District of Missouri. * AmerenUE, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: February 7, 2002 Filed: February 14, 2002

___________ Before LOKEN, BEAM, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Norman Banks brought this action against AmerenUE, his former employer, claiming he was denied a promotion and was harassed because of his race and age, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. , and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 632, et seq. The district court 1 denied Banks’s post-discovery motion to amend his complaint to include claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1981, and granted AmerenUE summary judgment. Banks appeals. After careful review of the record, we affirm.-2- The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Banks’s belated motion to amend to include claims which he could have raised earlier, and which would have required additional discovery. SeeBell v. Allstate Life Ins. Co
. , 160 F.3d 452, 454-55 (8th Cir. 1998). We further conclude that Banks failed to establish a prima facie case of age or race discrimination because he did not show he was qualified for the promotion, see Dotson v. Delta Consol. Indus., Inc. , 251 F.3d 780, 781 (8th Cir. 2001); and that he did not show the alleged harassment was severe and pervasive or based upon his race or age, see Bradley v. Widnall , 232 F.3d 626, 631- 32 (8th Cir. 2000). Accordingly, we affirm. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

RAUL GARCIA,

Plaintiff, No. 3:16-cv-00390-SB

v. 

 

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, ORDER

a Delaware Corporation; JERRALD MOORE,

Defendants.

HERNANDEZ, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Stacie Beckerman issued a Findings and Recommendation (#19) on 

June 24, 2016, in which she recommends that this Court dismiss Defendant Moore from the

action, dismiss Plaintiff’s second and fourth claim with prejudice, and dismiss Plaintiff’s third

claim with leave to amend. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)

and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were

timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v.

Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt,

1 - ORDER

Case 3:16-cv-00390-SB Document 21 Filed 08/10/16 Page 1 of 2
840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate

Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de

novo, I find no error.

CONCLUSION 

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Stacie Beckerman’s Findings & Recommendation

[19]. Accordingly, Defendant’s motion to dismiss [7] is granted. Defendant Moore is dismissed

from the action. Plaintiff’s second and fourth claims are dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff’s

third claim is dismissed with leave to amend.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this day of , 2016.

 

MARCO A. HERNANDEZ

United States District Judge

2 - ORDER

Case 3:16-cv-00390-SB Document 21 Filed 08/10/16 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


     We consent to the inclusion of our report dated April 18, 1997 with respect
to the audited combined financial statements of Educational Management, Inc. and
Wikert and Rhude, general partnership, as of December 31, 1996 and 1995 and for
each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996, our reports dated
May 16, 1997 with respect to the balance sheet of Nebraska College of Business
(a division of Nebraska Acquisition Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Quest
Education Corporation f/k/a Educational Medical, Inc.) as of March 31, 1997 and
the balance sheet of Lincoln School of Commerce (a division of Nebraska
Acquisition Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Quest Education Corporation
f/k/a Educational Medical, Inc.) as of March 31, 1997 in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A for Quest Education Corporation for the year ended March 31, 1999
and to the incorporation by reference of such report in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 No. 333-33025, Form S-3 No. 333-45707 Form S-3 No.
333-54251 and Form S-8 No. 333-32809 and related prospectuses of Quest Education
Corporation.


                                             /s/ WINTHER, STAVE & CO., LLP

Spencer, Iowa

June 29, 1999
Technical Work Group Meeting

Phoenix, Arizona

May 10, 2000

List of Attendees

Committee Members Present:

Clifford Barrett, CREDA Rick Johnson, GCT

Andres Cheama, Pueblo of Zuni Matt Kaplinski, GCRG

Dave Cohen, Trout Unlimited Robert King, UDWR

Wayne Cook, USRC Phillip Lehr, Colo. River Comm./Nevada

Wm. Davis, Eco Plan Assoc/CREDA Don Metz, FWS

Kurt Dongoske, The Hopi Tribe S. Clayton Palmer, WAPA

Brenda Drye, So. Paiute Consortium Bill Persons, AGFD

Christopher Harris, ADWR Randall Peterson, USBR

Norm Henderson, NPS/GCNRA Randy Seaholm CWCB

Amy Heuslein, BIA Robert Winfree, NPS/GCNP

Committee Members Absent:

Robert Begay, Navajo Nation

Nancy Hornewer, USGS

Kerry Christensen, Hualapai Tribe

John Shields, WY State Engr. Office

Fred Worthley, CFBC

Alternates Present: Alternate for:

Wayne Cook John Shields, WY State Engr. Office

Loretta Jackson Kerry Christensen, Hualapai Tribe

Tim Begay Robert Begay, Navajo Nation

Pam Hyde Mindy Schlimgen-Wilson, Am. Rivers

Other Interested Persons Present:

Garry Cantley, BIA Ruth Lambert, GCMRC

Nancy Coulam, USBR Mike Liszewski, GCMRC

Barry Gold, GCMRC Mary Orton, Mary Orton Company

Dennis Kubly, USBR Barbara Ralston, GCMRC
Technical Work Group Meeting

Phoenix, Arizona

May 11, 2000

List of Attendees

Committee Members Present:

Andres Cheama, Pueblo of Zuni Robert King, UDWR

Dave Cohen, Trout Unlimited Phillip Lehr, Colo. River Comm./Nevada

Kurt Dongoske, The Hopi Tribe Don Metz, FWS

Brenda Drye, So. Paiute Consortium Bill Persons, AGFD

Christopher Harris, ADWR Randall Peterson, USBR

Norm Henderson, NPS/GCNRA Randy Seaholm, CWCB

Rick Johnson, GCT Robert Winfree, NPS/GCNP

Matt Kaplinski, GCRG

Committee Members Absent:

Cliff Barrett, CREDA Wm. Davis, EcoPlan Assoc./CREDA

Robert Begay, Navajo Nation John Shields, WY State Engr. Office

Kerry Christensen, Hualapai Tribe Fred Worthley, CFBD

Alternates Present: Alternate for:

Gary Burton Clayton Palmer, WAPA

Pam Hyde Mary Schlimgen-Wilson, Am. Rivers

Loretta Jackson Kerry Christensen, Hualapai Tribe

Other Interested Persons Present:

Nancy Coulam, USBR Ruth Lambert, GCMRC

Barry Gold, GCMRC Mike Liszewski, GCMRC

Dennis Kubly, USBR Barbara Ralston, GCMRC
EXHIBIT 32

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the foregoing Report
on Form 10-QSB pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed filed pursuant to any provision of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or any other securities
law.

Each of the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78) and that the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Broadway Financial Corporation as of
and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007.



|      |  |                  |  |  |  |     |  |                               
|----- |  | ---------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------------
|      |  |                  |  | 
|      |  |                  |  | 
|Date: |  | November 9, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Paul C. Hudson            
|      |  |                  |  |  |  |     |  | Paul C. Hudson                
|      |  |                  |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer       
|      |  |                  |  |  |  |     |  | Broadway Financial Corporation
|      |  |                  |  | 
|Date: |  | November 9, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Samuel Sarpong            
|      |  |                  |  |  |  |     |  | Samuel Sarpong                
|      |  |                  |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer       
|      |  |                  |  |  |  |     |  | Broadway Financial Corporation
735 A.2d 72

#### OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, v. Paul L. HAMMER, Respondent.

No. 376 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

July 15, 1999.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 15th day of July, 1999, upon consideration of the Remand Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated May 10, 1999, Respondent’s Objections and response thereto, it is hereby

*542ORDERED that Paul L. Hammer be subjected to public censure by the Supreme Court. It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.
I

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2086

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 8, 1998

Referred to the Committee on Resources

AN ACT

To revise the boundaries of the George Washington

Birthplace National Monument.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 2086 RFH

1 SECTION 1. ADDITION TO NATIONAL MONUMENT.

2 (a) ADDITION.—The boundaries of the George Wash3 ington Birthplace National Monument are modified to in4 clude the property generally know as George Washington’s

5 Boyhood Home, Ferry Farm, located in Stafford County,

6 Virginia, across the Rappahannock River from Fredericks7 burg, Virginia, comprising approximately 8 acres. The

8 boundary modification is generally depicted on the map

9 entitled ‘‘George Washington Birthplace National Monu10 ment Boundary Map’’, numbered 322/80, 020 and dated

11 April 1998. The Secretary of the Interior shall keep the

12 map on file and available for public inspection in appro13 priate offices of the National Park Service.

14 (b) ACQUISITION OF EASEMENT.—After the enact15 ment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior may acquire

16 a conservation easement for the property described in sub17 section (a) to ensure the preservation of this important

18 cultural and natural resource associated with Ferry Farm.

19 SEC. 2. RESOURCE STUDY.

20 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 18 months after

21 the date on which funds are made available to carry out

22 this section, the Secretary of the Interior shall submit to

23 the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the

24 Senate and the Committee on Resources of the House of

25 Representatives a resource study of the property described

26 in section 1(a).
3

S 2086 RFH

1 (b) CONTENTS.—The study under subsection (a)

2 shall—

3 (1) identify the full range of resources and his4 toric themes associated with Ferry Farm, including

5 those associated with George Washington’s tenure at

6 the property described in section 1(a) and those as7 sociated with the Civil War period;

8 (2) identify alternatives for further National

9 Park Service involvement at the property described

10 in section 1(a) beyond those that may be provided

11 for in the acquisition authorized under section 1(b);

12 and

13 (3) include cost estimates for any necessary ac14 quisition, development, interpretation, operation, and

15 maintenance associated with the alternatives identi16 fied.

17 SEC. 3. AGREEMENTS.

18 Upon completion of the resource study under section

19 2, the Secretary of the Interior may enter into agreements

20 with the owner of the property described in section 1(a)

21 or other entities for the purpose of providing programs,
4

S 2086 RFH

1 services, facilities, or technical assistance that further the

2 preservation and public use of the property.

Passed the Senate October 7 (legislative day, October 2), 1998.

Attest: GARY SISCO,

Secretary.
Exhibit
32.1 - Certification
of Principal Executive Officer








CERTIFICATION
IN ACCORDANCE WITH


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED BY


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Internet America, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the nine months ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William
E. Ladin, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify in accordance
with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, to my knowledge that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








/s/ William E. Ladin,
      Jr.


William
      E. (Billy) Ladin, Jr.


Chief
      Executive Officer


Date:
      May 08, 2009
LAW OFFICES

OF

KURT G. CLARKE

ATTORNEY~ MEDIATOR~ ARBITRATOR

 

KURT G. CLARKE* FREDERICK O. BOADU 

HELEN MALVEAUX COUNSEL TO THE FIRM 

December 30, 2016 

Christopher Prine 

Clerk of the Court of Appeals 

301 Fannin St. 

Houston, Texas 77002-2066 

Re: Court of Appeals Number: 14-16-01002-CV 

 Trial Court Case Number: 2010-76740 

 Style: Pius Okafor, John Okafor, Anambra State Community In Houston, et al, v. 

 Anambra State Community, Houston 

Dear Mr. Prine: 

 I am requesting that the above referenced case be transferred to the First Court of Appeals. 

 The case numbers were inadvertently mixed up due to prior litigation between the parties. 

 Thank you for your usual cooperation and assistance. 

Sincerely, 

Kurt G. Clarke 

Kurt G. Clarke 

c.c.: 

- Patrick Chukelu 

 

6200 SAVOY DRIVE, SUITE 458, HOUSTON, TEXAS 77036 

PHONE (713) 779-5500 FAX (713) 779-6668 

E-MAIL - KGCLAW@AOL.COM

*FELLOW – COLLEGE OF THE STATE BAR

ACCEPTED

14-16-01002-CV

FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

12/30/2016 5:08:06 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/30/2016 5:08:06 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
##### 



GE Capital Fee Letter
  Credit
Agreement GE
Capital Borrower
  Term Loan B Prepayment Fee provided Section 1.3(c)
 Section
(2)




---



##### 








---



##### 



Very truly yours,WILSONS LEATHER HOLDINGS INC.By:
    
    /s/ Stacy  KruseTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer and TreasurerACCEPTED AND AGREED:GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATIONBy:Its Duly Authorized Signatory




---



##### 



Very truly yours,WILSONS LEATHER HOLDINGS INC.By:Title:ACCEPTED AND AGREED:GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATIONBy:
    
    /s/ Kristina M. MillerIts Duly Authorized Signatory
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, DC 20549
 FORM 10-Q/A
 Amendment No. 1
 þ
    
    QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007
 OR
 o
    
    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the transition period from to
 Commission file number: 0-26906
 ASTA FUNDING, INC.
  Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction 
of incorporation or organization)
    
    22-3388607
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)
 210 Sylvan Ave., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey
(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    07632
(Zip Code)
 Registrants telephone number: (201) 567-5648
  þ o
  Large accelerated filer oAccelerated filer þNon-accelerated filer o(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)Smaller reporting company o o þ




---



##### Table of Contents



ASTA FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q/A
Amendment No. 1
 EXPLANATORY NOTE




---



##### 



ASTA FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q/A
Amendment No. 1
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2007
INDEX
 Item 6. ExhibitsSignaturesExhibit 10.4  Subservicing Agreement dated March 2, 2007Exhibit 31.1  Section 302 Certificate of Principal Executive OfficerExhibit 31.2  Section 302 Certificate of Principal Financial OfficerExhibit 32.1  Section 906 Certificate of Principal Executive OfficerExhibit 32.2  Section 906 Certificate of Principal Financial OfficerEX-10.4: SUBSERVICING AGREEMENTEX-31.1: CERTIFICATIONEX-31.2: CERTIFICATIONEX-32.1: CERTIFICATIONEX-32.2: CERTIFICATION




---



##### Table of Contents



Item 6. Exhibits
  ExhibitNumber10.4
    
    Subservicing Agreement dated March 2, 200731.1
    
    Certification of the Registrants Chief Executive Officer, Gary
Stern, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.31.2
    
    Certification of the Registrants Chief Financial Officer, Robert J.
Michel, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.32.1
    
    Certification of the Registrants Chief Executive Officer, Gary
Stern, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.32.2
    
    Certification of the Registrants Chief Financial Officer, Robert J.
Michel, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.




---



##### Table of Contents



ASTA FUNDING, INC.
(Registrant)Date: March 12, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Gary SternGary Stern, ChairmanPresident, Chief Executive
Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)Date: March 12, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Robert J. MichelRobert J. Michel, Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer)
cool_ex422.htm

EXHIBIT 4.22
  
 AMENDMENT
 TO THE $385,000 PROMISSORY NOTE DATED February 19, 2018
  
 The parties agree that $385,000 Promissory Note by and between Cool Technologies, Inc. (“Company”) and Lucas Hoppel (“Holder”) is hereby amended as follows:
  
 Maturity Date: The Maturity Date shall be extended to August 1st, 2019.
  
 ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE $385,000 PROMISSORY NOTE REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT.
  
 Please indicate acceptance and approval of this amendment dated May 1st, 2019 by signing below:
  
 	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Tim Hassett	 	/s/ Lucas Hoppel 	 
	Tim Hassett 	 	Lucas Hoppel	 
	 Cool Technologies, Inc.
 Chief Executive Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JESUS SANTIAGO SOSA-ORTIZ, a.k.a.

Jesus Sosa-Ortiz,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Nos. 13-10291

 13-10292

D.C. Nos. 2:12-cr-01668-JAT

 2:13-cr-50014-JAT

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Ronald S.W. Lew, District Judge, Presiding**

Submitted June 25, 2014*** 

Before: HAWKINS, TALLMAN, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated appeals, Jesus Santiago Sosa-Ortiz appeals from the

district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 72-month

FILED

JUL 10 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 

** The Honorable Ronald S.W. Lew, Senior United States District Judge

for the Central District of California, sitting by designation.

 *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
sentence for reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and the

revocation of supervised release and 8-month concurrent sentences imposed

thereupon. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Sosa-Ortiz’s

counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a

motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Sosa-Ortiz the

opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or

answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal in case

number 13-10291. The appeal in case number 13-10292 is moot. See Spencer v.

Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 12-14 (1998).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

In case number 13-10291, the judgment is AFFIRMED; in case number

13-10292, the appeal is DISMISSED as moot.

2 13-10291 & 13-10292
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

MICHAEL EDWIN THATCHER, 

Plaintiff, 

V. 

COMMISIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY 

ADMINISTRATION, 

Defendants. 

MCSHANE, Judge: 

Civ. No. 1 :15-cv-01566-MC 

OPINION AND ORDER 

Plaintiff Thatcher is preceding pro se on an appeal from a denial of society security and 

disability benefits. Since filing this action Plaintiff has requested three extensions of time to file 

Plaintiffs Brief (April 5, 2016 (ECF No. 12), May 27, 2016 (ECF No. 14), and July 28, 2016 

(ECF No. 16). All three requests were granted by this court. 

On November 8, 2016, with no responsive activity from the Plaintiff as of July 28, 2016, 

the Court ordered plaintiff to show cause as to why this action should not be dismissed for failure 

to prosecute pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41 and LR 41-2(a). Plaintiff was given 30 days to file a 

Status Report and Plaintiffs brief. On December 15, 2016 the court received a Plaintiffs Status 

Report. The status report expressed a feeling of deep disappointment and frustration. Plaintiff 

had approached several attorneys, but none would agree to work on the case. An earlier motion 

1 - OPINION AND ORDER 

Case 1:15-cv-01566-MC Document 20 Filed 02/08/17 Page 1 of 2
for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 3) was denied on September 14, 2015 (ECF No. 6), 

because there were no exceptional circumstances. See Palmer v. Valdez, 560 F.3d 965, 970 (9th 

Cir. 2009). I find that continues to be true under the Palmer analysis. 

The status report also asked that I take a close look at plaintiffs case. I reviewed closely 

the ALJ's decision along with the transcripts and accompanying record. Based on the record, I 

find that the case does not have a likelihood of success on the merits. Because there is not a 

showing as to why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute, I order this case to 

be dismissed with prejudice. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this 8th day of February, 2017. 

2 - OPINION AND ORDER 

L_ \ ___ _ 

Michael J. McShane 

United States District Judge 

Case 1:15-cv-01566-MC Document 20 Filed 02/08/17 Page 2 of 2
# L_2011241EN.01003502.xml

| 17.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 241/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 241/35

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (EC) No 662/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 establishing a procedure for the negotiation and conclusion of agreements between Member States and third countries on particular matters concerning the law applicable to contractual and non-contractual obligations

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 200 of 31 July 2009
  )

On page 29, Article 12(2):

for:

‘2.   Where, at the time of entry into force of this Regulation, a Member State has already completed the negotiations but has not yet concluded the agreement, Article 3, Article 8(2) to (4) and Article 9 shall apply.’,

read:

‘2.   Where, at the time of entry into force of this Regulation, a Member State has already completed the negotiations but has not yet concluded the agreement, Article 3, Article 8(2) and (3) and Article 9 shall apply.’.

---