alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5
<LEGEND>
Exhibit 27  Financial Data Schedule

This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's unaudited financial statements at June 30, 1999 and 2000, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.



<S>                                           <C>                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS               6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1998         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-20-1999         JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                            102,782              64,234
<SECURITIES>                                    1,066,065             748,232
<RECEIVABLES>                                      31,900              11,468
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0                   0
<INVENTORY>                                        84,970              76,287
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                1,575,690           1,016,455
<PP&E>                                            161,379             166,562
<DEPRECIATION>                                    108,058             138,431
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  1,678,309           1,098,578
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              76,892              27,865
<BONDS>                                                 0                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0                   0
<COMMON>                                            2,925               2,925
<OTHER-SE>                                      6,248,746           6,248,746
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    1,678,309           1,098,578
<SALES>                                           962,175             462,499
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  962,175             462,499
<CGS>                                             151,965              84,462
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   1,001,080             341,999
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  314,702             284,680
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (315,428)           (131,892)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (315,428)           (131,892)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0                   0
<CHANGES>                                               0                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (315,428)           (131,892)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (0.11)              (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.11)              (0.05)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.01

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Transmeta Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Matthew
R. Perry, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the
best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company for the periods presented therein.

Date: November 8, 2004               By: /s/ MATTHEW R. PERRY
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     President and Chief Executive Officer,
                                     Transmeta Corporation

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Transmeta Corporation and will be retained by Transmeta
Corporation and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-13-00591- CV
Mary R iem ann an d Teresa Ringbom , Appellan ts

v. Norm an John Weaner, II, and Dora Weaner , Appellees

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F B LANCO CO UNTY, 424 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. CV0685 6, H ONO RAB LE J. ALLAN GARRETT, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellants Mary Riemann and Tere sa Ringbom have filed a motion to dismiss this appea l with eac h party to pay their own co s t s , an d they cer tify that appellee s do not oppose the motion. We g rant the motion and dismiss the appea l with eac h party to pay their own costs. See Tex. R. App. P . 42.1.

__________________________________________ Melissa Goodwin, Jus tice Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Rose, and Goodwin Dismissed on Appellants’ Motion Filed: September

11, 2013
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 98-2874SD

_____________ United States of America, * * Appellee, *

* v. * * Marat Movsesyants, * * Appellant. *

_____________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the District No. 98-2878SD of South Dakota.

_____________ [UNPUBLISHED] United States of America, * * Appellee, *

* v. * * Armen Atayants, * * Appellant. *

_____________ No. 98-2879SD

_____________ United States of America, * * Appellee, *-2- * v. * * Ivan Kovalev, * * Appellant. *

_____________ No. 98-2880SD

_____________ United States of America, * * Appellee, *

* v. * * Alex Nagorniuk, * * Appellant. *

_____________ Submitted: March 9, 1999

Filed: March 18, 1999

_____________ Before FAGG, LAY, and WOLLMAN, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Marat Movsesyants, Armen Atayants, Ivan Kovalev, and Alex Nagorniuk (collectively the appellants) appeal their convictions on felony charges related to a motor vehicle theft ring. We affirm.-3-

Theappellants raise several contentions related to the sufficiency of the e vidence supporting their convictions. We reject all of these contentions. First, the recordcontains substantial evidence to support the jury's verdicts. Second, we conclude the district court did not commit reversible error in denying the motions for dismissal of the indictment, for severance, for judgment of acquittal, and for new trial, orin instructing the jury about the conspiracy. Third, the appellants' assertions that the government failed to reveal exculpatory evidence and the district court improperly admitted evidence against all of the coconspirators are either unsupported by the record, otherwise without legal merit, or both. Having carefully reviewed the record, we are satisfied the district court correctly resolved each of the appellants' claims and an extended opinion by this court would have no precedential value. We thus affirm the appellants' convictions. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Flow                    
csv

#### All data considered provisional and subject to revision.

      Flow                    
json
COLORADO RIVER BELOW BIG BENDLatitude: 35.088Longitude: -114.624Elevation: 488.40

Colorado River Below Big Bend

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Gutz Peak Site Page...



Gutz Peak

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Gardner Peak Site Page...



Gardner Peak

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Rainbow Canyon Site Page...



Rainbow Canyon

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Bristlecone Trail Site Page...



Bristlecone Trail

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Lee Canyon Site Page...



Lee Canyon

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Fort Valley Site Page...



Fort Valley

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Mormon Mtn Summit Site Page...



Mormon Mtn Summit

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Nutrioso Site Page...



Nutrioso

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Chalender Site Page...



Chalender

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Baker Butte Smt Site Page...



Baker Butte Smt

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Corduroy Flat Site Page...



Corduroy Flat

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Defiance Mines Site Page...



Defiance Mines

Courtesy NRCS - Go to White River Nv Site Page...



White River Nv

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Suu Ranch Site Page...



Suu Ranch

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Kyle Canyon Site Page...



Kyle Canyon

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Hayford Peak Site Page...



Hayford Peak

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Pine Nut Site Page...



Pine Nut

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Sand Hollow Site Page...



Sand Hollow

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Cave Valley Site Page...



Cave Valley

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Vermillion Site Page...



Vermillion

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Baker Butte Site Page...



Baker Butte

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Baldy Site Page...



Baldy

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Harris Flat Site Page...



Harris Flat

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Heber Site Page...



Heber

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Kolob Site Page...



Kolob

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Little Grassy Site Page...



Little Grassy

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Long Flat Site Page...



Long Flat

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Long Valley Jct Site Page...



Long Valley Jct

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Maverick Fork Site Page...



Maverick Fork

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Midway Valley Site Page...



Midway Valley

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Mormon Mountain Site Page...



Mormon Mountain

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Promontory Site Page...



Promontory

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Ward Mountain Site Page...



Ward Mountain

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Webster Flat Site Page...



Webster Flat

Courtesy NRCS - Go to White Horse Lake Site Page...



White Horse Lake

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Snowslide Canyon Site Page...



Snowslide Canyon
BILLY J. WILLIAMS, OSB #901366 

United States Attorney 

District of Oregon 

ETHAN D. KNIGHT, OSB #99298 

GEOFFREY A. BARROW 

CRAIG J. GABRIEL, OSB #01257 

Assistant United States Attorneys 

ethan.knight@usdoj.gov 

geoffrey.barrow@usdoj.gov 

craig.gabriel@usdoj.gov 

1000 SW Third Ave., Suite 600 

Portland, OR 97204-2902 

Telephone: (503) 727-1000 

Attorneys for United States of America 

FrL8J21 tiAR '1612:32lfSDC-ORP 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

v. 

AMMON BUNDY, et al., 

Defendants. 

3:16-CR-00051-BR 

MOTION TO UNSEAL 

SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT 

The United States of America, by Billy J. Williams, United States Attorney for the 

District of Oregon, and through Ethan D. Knight, Geoffrey A. Barrow, and Craig J. Gabriel, 

Assistant United States Attorneys, moves the Court for an order unsealing the Superseding 

Indictment as to the remaining defendant in this matter. It is the government's understanding that 

said defendant's family is aware of the Indictment and has hired counsel for the defendant. 

Respectfully submitted this 21st day of March 2016. 

BILLY J. WILLIAMS 

IGHT, OSB #99298 

GEOFFRE A. BARROW 

CRAIG J. GABRIEL, OSB #01257 

Assistant United States Attorneys 

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 329 Filed 03/21/16 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       5,958,640
<SECURITIES>                                27,751,551
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,244,947
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            44,114,660
<PP&E>                                       1,828,183
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              48,401,830
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,829,300
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,033
<OTHER-SE>                                  40,561,497
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                48,401,830
<SALES>                                        744,037
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               744,037
<CGS>                                          433,113
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  433,113
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,039,246
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (8,235,075)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (8,235,075)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (8,235,075)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.75)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
|   | (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ William E. Ladin, Jr. |
|--------|---------------------------|

|   | William      E. (Billy) Ladin, Jr. |
|--------|------------------------------------|

|   | Chief      Executive Officer |
|--------|------------------------------|

|   | Date:      February 17, 2009 |
|--------|------------------------------|
|   |                         |
|   |                         |
|   |                         |

----
#### Surinder KAUR, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-76555.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 16, 2007 *.

Filed April 19, 2007.

Zeena Batliwalla, Rai & Associates, P.C., San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Donna S. Fitzgerald, Esq., U.S. Dept, of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Surinder Kaur, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of *731Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of asylum, -withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Because the BIA conducted a de novo review of the law and evidence, we review the decision of the BIA. We deny the petition. *See Cordon-Garcia v. INS,*204 F.3d 985, 990 (9th Cir.2000).

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s conclusion that Kaur faded to meet her burden of proving past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution. Kaur’s allegations of mistreatment by Indian police during a single detention and isolated visits to her home do not rise to the level of past persecution, or form the basis of an objectively reasonable fear of future persecution. *See Gu v. Gonzales,*454 F.3d 1014, 1019-21 (9th Cir.2006) (Chinese national who was beaten 10 times with a rubber pipe and held three days by Chinese police on account of unsanctioned religious practice did not establish past persecution).

Because Kaur did not establish eligibility for asylum, she necessarily failed to establish a claim for withholding of removal. *See id.*

Kaur’s CAT claim also fails because she did not show that it is more likely than not that she would be tortured if removed to India. *See Malhi v. INS,*336 F.3d 989, 993 (9th Cir.2003).

PETITION DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                        1646
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              1664
<PP&E>                                       92404
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               94124
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        46770
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    276750
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (229397)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 94124
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               508
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 2255
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             971
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (2718)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (2718)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (2718)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.02)

[/R]

</TABLE>
#### Estelle Hulis, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Mason Hulis, Deceased, Respondent, v M. Foschi & Sons, Defendant and Fourth-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, and Peter Strocchia & Sons, Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants. Fink Baking Corp., Second Third-Party Defendant and Fourth-Party Defendant-Appellant.

The appellants’ respective cross motions for partial sum*644mary judgment were properly denied as the evidence before the court presented a triable issue of fact as to whether the plaintiff and the decedent had a valid common-law marriage under Georgia law. New York will recognize a common-law marriage if it was validly contracted in another State *(Matter of Mott v Duncan Petroleum Trans.,*51 NY2d 289). In denying the appellants’ cross motions, the court did not err in considering evidence that it had previously ruled excludable under CPLR 4519 *(see, Phillips v Kantor & Co.,*31 NY2d 307). Although it is unnecessary for the purposes of this appeal to determine if the court’s previous rulings under CPLR 4519 were correct, we note that the statute, by its terms, applies only where the prospective testimony is being offered *against*an administrator. Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Niehoff and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
#### Marine Midland Bank, N. A., Appellant, v Charles R. Cohen et al., Respondents.

— Weiss, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term (Kuhnen, J.), entered June 27, 1985 in Broome County, which denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and granted the cross motion of defendants G. Paul Cohen and Sharol F. Cohen for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them.

The parties in this action to recover on a note accompanying a secondary mortgage on property owned by defendants at 33-35 Court Street in the City of Binghamton have advised this court that a settlement has been reached. This being the case, the controversy is moot and we discern no reason to accede to plaintiffs request to render an advisory decision on the issues raised *(see, Matter of Starmer v Whitney Point Cent. School Dist.,*96 AD2d 640).

Appeal dismissed, as moot, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Main, Weiss, Yesawich, Jr., and Levine, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1859 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1859

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for the participation 
   of pediatric subspecialists in the National Health Service Corps 
                    program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 16, 2015

 Mr. Collins of New York (for himself and Mr. Courtney) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for the participation 
   of pediatric subspecialists in the National Health Service Corps 
                    program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ensuring Children's Access to 
Specialty Care Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. PARTICIPATION OF PEDIATRIC SUBSPECIALTIES IN NATIONAL HEALTH 
              SERVICE CORPS.

    (a) Primary Health Services Definition.--Section 331(a)(3)(D) of 
the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254d(a)(3)(D)) is amended by 
inserting ``(including pediatric subspecialties and special 
qualifications in pediatrics)'' after ``pediatrics''.
    (b) Behavioral and Mental Health Professionals Definition.--Section 
331(a)(3)(E)(i) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 
254d(a)(3)(E)(i)) is amended by inserting ``(and pediatric 
subspecialists thereof)'' after ``psychiatrists''.
    (c) Health Professional Shortage Areas.--Section 332(a) of the 
Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254e(a)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)(B), by inserting ``(including such a 
        population group of children and adolescents)'' after 
        ``shortage''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2)(A), by inserting ``pediatric 
        subspecialty medical residency or fellowship training site,'' 
        after ``health department,''.
    (d) Loan Repayment Program.--Subparagraph (B) of section 338B(b)(1) 
of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254l-1(b)(1)) is amended by 
inserting ``(including a pediatric subspecialty residency or fellowship 
training program)'' before the semicolon.
                                 <all>
```