alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 173 (Friday, September 10, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 50752]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19539]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD

[Docket No. EP 552 (Sub-No. 25)]


Railroad Revenue Adequacy--2020 Determination

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.

ACTION: Notice of decision.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On September 7, 2021, the Board served a decision announcing 
the 2020 revenue adequacy determinations for the Nation's Class I 
railroads. Five Class I railroads (BNSF Railroad Company, CSX 
Transportation, Inc., The Kansas City Southern Railway Company, Soo 
Line Corporation, and Union Pacific Railroad Company) were found to be 
revenue adequate.

DATES: This decision is effective on September 7, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pedro Ramirez, (202) 245-0333. 
Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through the Federal 
Relay Service at (800) 877-8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under 49 U.S.C. 10704(a)(3), the Board is 
required to make an annual determination of railroad revenue adequacy. 
A railroad is considered revenue adequate under 49 U.S.C. 10704(a) if 
it achieves a rate of return on net investment (ROI) equal to at least 
the current cost of capital for the railroad industry. For 2020, this 
number was determined to be 7.89% in R.R. Cost of Capital--2020, EP 558 
(Sub-No. 24) (STB served Aug. 6, 2021). The Board then applied this 
revenue adequacy standard to each Class I railroad. Five Class I 
carriers (BNSF Railroad Company, CSX Transportation, Inc., The Kansas 
City Southern Railway Company, Soo Line Corporation, and Union Pacific 
Railroad Company) were found to be revenue adequate for 2020.
    The decision in this proceeding is posted at www.stb.gov.

    Decided: September 3, 2021.

    By the Board, Board Members Begeman, Fuchs, Oberman, Primus, and 
Schultz.
Eden Besera,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2021-19539 Filed 9-9-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
Attachment 10

Key principles:

- $475,000 annual cost is reasonable

- monitoring trips are appropriately charged to PA/cultural programs ($75,000)

- tribal participate spans all resource areas

- the PEP review will help focus FY 2002 PA work items, but may not be completed in time to

direct FY 2001 work items

- Tribal participation should be funded as an administrative cost ($400,000)

Tribal Participation - FY 2001

Appropriations - $ 75,000

AMP Administrative Costs - $325,000

Tribal Monitoring Trips - $ 75,000

 (PA)

$475,000

PA Budget - FY 2001

Tribal Monitoring Trips - $ 75,000

HPP Completion - $ 50,000

Monitoring & Mitigation $473,000

USBR Admin - $ 50,000

Tribal Participation,

 Monitoring $325,000

$973,000

R:\web\99dec07twg_a10.wpd
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 20

- 857 V

UNPUBLISHED

SHIRLEY V ANDERFORD

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: October 12, 2021

Special Processing Unit (SPU) ;

Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine

Administration (SIRVA)

Sean Frank Greenwood, Greenwood Law Firm, Houston, TX , for P etitioner.

Voris Edward Johnson , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for R espondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On July 14, 2020

, Shirley Vanderfor d filed a petition for compensation under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq. 2 (the

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that “ she received a flu vaccine on October 30, 2018

, and thereafter suffered from a Shoulder I n jury Relat ed to Vaccine Administration

( “ SIRVA ” ). Petition at ¶ 1. T he case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the

Office of Special Masters.

On October 8, 2021

, R espondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes

that P etitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at

1. Specifically, R espondent “ conclu ded that Petit ioner suffered a T able injury o f right

SIRVA. Id. at 6 . Respondent further noted that “ DICP did not iden tify any other caus es

1 Because this unpublished R uling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

- Government Act

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government

Services). This means the R uling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that

the identified material f its within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755

. Hereinafter, for ease

of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. §

300aa (2012 ).2 for Petitioner ’ s right SIRVA, and based on the medical records . . . Petitioner met the

statu tory requirements by experien cing six months of residual effects. Id.

In view of R espondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that

P etitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
<PAGE>

                     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
of Industri-Matematik International Corp. on Form S-8 (SEC file no. 333-19737)
and Form S-8 (SEC file no. 333-25407) of our report dated July 29, 1998, on our
audits of the consolidated financial statements of Industri-Matematik
International Corp. as of April 30, 1997 and 1998, and for the years ended April
30, 1996, 1997, and 1998, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form
10-K.

Stockholm, Sweden, July 29, 1998

OHRLINGS COOPERS & LYBRAND AB

By: /S/ ROBERT BARNDEN
    -------------------------
Robert Barnden
# C_2006270EN.01001001.xml

| 7.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 270/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 270/10

---

Notice concerning a request in accordance with Article 30 of Directive 2004/17/EC

(2006/C 270/05)

Request made on behalf of a Member State

On 24 October 2006 the Commission received a request in accordance with Article 30(4) of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors (1). The first working day following receipt of the request is 25 October 2006.

1

This request, which comes from the United Kingdom, concerns the supply of electricity and gas in that country, with the exception of Northern Ireland (the request therefore concerns the supply of electricity and gas in England, Scotland and Wales). The abovementioned Article 30 provides that Directive 2004/17/EC is not applicable when the relevant activity is directly exposed to competition in markets to which access is not restricted. These conditions are evaluated solely for the purposes of Directive 2004/17/EC and are without prejudice to the application of competition rules.

The Commission is allowed a period of three months to take a decision on this request, commencing on the working day referred to above. The period therefore expires on 25 January 2007.

The provisions of the third subparagraph of the abovementioned paragraph 4 are applicable. Consequently, the period allowed to the Commission may be extended by one month. Any such extension must be published.

---

(1)  OJ L 134, 30.4.2004, p. 1.

1

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



To the Board of Directors of
    SRS Labs, Inc.




         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements (Nos. 333-18981, 333-18983, 333-18985, 333-18987, and 333-18989) on
Form S-8 of SRS Labs, Inc. (the "Company") of our report dated January 31,
1997, appearing in the Company's annual report on Form 10-KSB for the year
ended December 31, 1996.





/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
March 28, 1997
Costa Mesa, California
Page	1 – OBJECTION	TO	JOINT	STATUS	REPORT	- DISCOVERY

ROBERT W. RAINWATER, Oregon State Bar No. 084489

Email: rrainwater@rainwaterlaw.org

Rainwater Law Group

1327 SE Tacoma Street, Suite 239

Portland, Oregon 97202-6639

Telephone: (971) 271-7566

Fax: (503) 231-8276

Attorney for Defendant

JASON CHARLES BLOMGREN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

PORTLAND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

v.

JASON CHARLES BLOMGREN,

Defendant.

No. 3:16-cr-00051-BR

OBJECTION TO JOINT STATUS 

REPORT ON DISCOVERY 

MANAGEMENT

Defendant Jason Charles Blomgren, through his attorney, Robert W. Rainwater, having read 

the joint status report on discovery management, document # 337, hereby objects to the discovery 

procedures set forth therein, specifically Subsection C of the Joint Proposal Regarding Discovery 

Management.

Mr. Blomgren objects to having the discovery, after being provided to the CJA Panel Office, 

being then sent to a third-party vendor for hosting and organizing, without first receiving a copy for 

his own use. While Mr. Blomgren has no objection to a third party eventually process and organizing 

the discovery, but he would request that discovery be provided directly to his counsel prior to being 

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 343 Filed 03/24/16 Page 1 of 2
Page	2 – OBJECTION	TO	JOINT	STATUS	REPORT	- DISCOVERY

sent to a third party vendor. Mr. Blomgren needs to have immediate access to those documents and 

believes that his right to prepare his defense in a timely manner would be impaired by the delay in 

sending the discovery to a third party first.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this March 24, 2016.

s/ Robert W. Rainwater

Robert W. Rainwater

OSB # 084489

(971) 271-7566

Attorney for Defendant

Jason Charles Blomgren

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 343 Filed 03/24/16 Page 2 of 2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk November 20, 2012

d1113 

# Order

November 20, 2012

145784

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145784

COA: 308974

Lenawee CC: 10

- 014926

- FH

JASON ALLEN BOONE,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 10, 2012 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES 29 AND 30 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K/A FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         194,314
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,172,142
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (920,916)
<INVENTORY>                                  8,558,276
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,035,077
<PP&E>                                       3,948,891
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,507,758)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              28,007,943
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       41,579,787
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    26,529,282
<OTHER-SE>                                (40,701,125)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                28,007,943
<SALES>                                     36,606,338
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            37,571,960
<CGS>                                       16,225,550
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               27,117,786
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            15,842,110
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             2,629,525
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,336,958
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (21,613,486)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (21,613,486)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (21,613,486)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.77)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.77)
        

</TABLE>
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Lost Creek Ventures, LLC D/B/A Happy Bulldog Management;

Stephan Epstein; and Marilyn Roth Epstein v. Alan Pilgrim

Ap pellate case number: 01

- 15

- 00375

- CV

Trial cou rt case number: C

- 1

- CV

- 12

- 007660

Trial court: County Court at Law No. 2 of Travis County

The motion for rehearing filed by Appellant s Lost Creek Ventures, LLC, doing business

as Happy Bulldog Management, Stephan Epstein, and Marilyn Roth Epstein is denie d

.

Justice’s signature: /s/ Jane Bland

Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Justices Higley, Bland, and Massengale

Date: July 26 , 2016
# THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE 159TH DISTRIC T COURT OF ANGELINA COUNTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 27th

day of February, 2015 , the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

ERIK DEWAYNE DRAYTON , Appellant

NO. 12

- 14

- 00144

- CR; Trial Court No. 2013

- 0725

Opinion by Greg Neeley, Justice.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

was determined; and therein our said Court made i ts order in these words:

“ THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record and briefs filed herein, and the

same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that there was no error in the judgment.

I t is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the judgment of the court

below be in all things affirmed , and that this decision be certified to the court below for

observance. ”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals

for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly

recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN , Chief Justice of our Court

of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of

Tyler, this the 4 th day of Ma y, 2015.

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By:

_______________________________ Chief Deputy Clerk
Glen Canyon Dam Technical Work Group Meeting April 8-9, 2008 

 List of Attachments 

 No. Title Author / Presenter 1 Action Items TWG 2 Sediment AHG PPT John O’Brien 3 Hydropower Economics Questions Rick Johnson 4a SA Review of HFT and Improving SA Information Transfer 

to the TWG Report  

4b SA Review of HFT and Improving SA Information Transfer to the TWG Report PPT 

  Dave Garrett 

4c GCMRC Responses to the SA Comments on the Science Plan for Potential 2008 Experimental High Flow at Glen Canyon Dam, dated Jan. 13, 2008 

 John Hamill 

5a April 2008 Grand Canyon Sediment Update PPT David Topping 

 5b 

CREDA Comments/Questions on 2008 High Flow Experimental Science Plan, December 2007, with GCMRC Responses 

 Ted Melis 

5c Science Plan for Potential 2008 Experimental High Flow at Glen Canyon Dam Report, dated Dec. 27, 2007 

Ted Melis 

5d Update on 2008 Experimental High Flow Test and Observations Ted Melis 

5e Is there enough Sand? 5f Modeling Updates and next steps FY09 Work Plan Scott Wright 

5g Development and Application of a Water Temperature Model for the Colorado River Below Glen Canyon Dam, Arizona Report 

 Scott Wright 

5h Update on Analysis of 2005 Imagery PPT Jack Schmidt Mike Breedlove 

5i Update on the Cultural Monitoring R&D Project PPT Helen Fairley 5j Legacy Monitoring Data Review Panel, Report to GCMRC Keith Kintigh 5k Evaluation of Terrestrial Lidar as a Tool for Monitoring 

Geomorphic Change at Archaeological Sites in Grand Canyon National Park PPT 

 Brian Collins 

6 Geoarchaeology in Grand Canyon Update for 2007 and 2008 PPT 

Jonathan Damp 

7 LTEP Status Update Dennis Kubly 8a Low Steady Summer Flows 2000 Synthesis Project PPT, 

and Goal 12 8b Experimental Flows of 2000, Brief Summary of Associated 

Scientific Studies 8c GCDAMP Goal 12: Maintain a high-quality monitoring, 

research, and adaptive management program 

  Matthew Andersen 

9 Impacts of the High Flow Experiment on GCMRC’s Approved FY08 Work Plan 

John Hamill 

10 Translocation of humpback chub above Chute Falls PPT Glen Knowles/Pam Sponholz  11a Conservation Measures 2007 and 2008 Biological 

Opinions Glen Canyon Dam Operations PPT Dennis Kubly 

11b GCMRC Monitoring and Research Plan to support the GCD AMP PPT 

John Hamill 

12a Budget Ad Hoc Group Report Dennis Kubly 12b Preliminary Fiscal Year 2009 Glen Canyon Dam AMP 

Budget Memorandum dated April 17, 2008 John Hamill 

13 National Park Service Proposed Budget 2008/2009 Spreadsheet 

Norm Henderson 

14a Review of Terrestrial Monitoring Protocols for the Grand Canyon 

14b Review of Terrestrial Monitoring Protocols for the Grand Canyon PPT 

 Dr. David Cooper
Humpback Chub Refuge and Hatchery Planning Update

TWG - 24 January 2013

• 1,000 HBC SNARRC1 refuge stock is complete. Year classes and number per class 

listed in the table below.

Table 1. Composition of humpback chub refuge stock at SNARRC, Dexter, NM. 

• 500 HBC on Station for translocation from the 7/12/12 collection. The chub 

currently average 130mm in TL and should reach 150mm TL by May stocking 

window; 

o 200 fish destined for Shinumo Creek and 300 for Havasu Creek. 

o HBC will be PIT tagged at the end of March and flow trained during the 

month of April. 

• Agreement in place for providing assistance with rearing fish at SNARRC for future 

translocations as needed (fish collected from the LCR, not produced from captive 

population). 

1Southwest Native Aquatic Resources and Recovery Center; formerly Dexter National Fish 

Hatchery and Technology Center.

Collection Date Number Age class

July- October 2008 277 4

July- October 2009 205 3

July 2010 175 2

November 2011 200 1

July 2012 175 <1

Total 1032
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Asta Funding, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Gary Stern, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company
         as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of
         the Company for the periods presented.

Dated: May 9, 2006


                                                    /s/ Gary Stern
                                                    -------------------
                                                    Gary Stern
                                                    Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Asta Funding, Inc. and will be retained by Asta Funding, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.