alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of

the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Elton Alderman, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Prolong
International Corporation (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|(1) |  | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated:    April 28, 2003



|
|
|
|
Basin Hydrology 

Colorado River Basin

Glen Canyon Dam

Adaptive Management Program

Technical Work Group Meeting

Phoenix, Arizona

August 15, 2002
200

Co

Ap

Unr

I

Flaming 

Blue M

Navajo 

Lake P
Aggregate Upper Colorado Riv

Precipitation - WY 2002

0

255075

100125150175

Oct-01

Nov-01

Dec-01

Jan-02

Feb-02

Mar-02

Apr-02

May-02

Percent of Average
 La

ke Powell U

n

r

e

g

ulat

e

d In

flo

Wat

e

r year 2002

0

10,

000

20,

000

30,

000

40,

000

50,

000

60,

000

Oct-01

Nov-01

Dec-01

Jan-02

Feb-02

Mar-02

Apr-02

May-02

Jun02

Cubic Feet Per Second

2002 Obse

rve

d

Average U

n

re

g

ulated

Water Year 2002 Lake Po

Unregulated Inflow
 Lake Powell Unregulated Inflow

Water year 2001

0

10,00020,00030,00040,00050,00060,000

01-Oct

01-Nov

01-Dec

01-Jan

01-Feb

01-Mar

01-Apr

01-May

01Jun

Cubic Feet Per Second2001 Observed Average Unregulated

Water Year 2001 Lake Po

Unregulated Inflow
Lake Powell Unregulated Inf

Water year 2002 vs 1977

0

10,00020,00030,00040,00050,00060,000

Oct-01

Nov-01

Dec-01

Jan-02

Feb-02

Mar-02

Apr-02

May-02

Jun02

Cubic Feet Per Second2002 1977

Water Year 2002 Lake Po

Inflow Compared to 19
C

olo

r

a

d

o River at Lees 

Synthe

siz

ed Natur

al F

0

5,000

10,00015,00020,00025,00030,00035,00040,00045,00050,000

1-Oct

1-Nov

1-Dec

1-Jan

1-Feb

1-Mar

1-Apr

1-May

1-Jun

Cubic Feet Per Second 1934 1977 2002
Projected 2003 Lake Powe

Scenario WY 2003 

16.2 maf

(134 %)

Maximum 

Probable

10.4 maf

(86 %)

Most

Probable

4.6 maf

(38 %)

Minimum

Probable
Natural Flow at Lee Ferry, A

0.05.0

10.015.020.025.030.0

1896

1904

1912

1920

1928

1936

1944

1952

1960

Water Year

Million Acre-Feet 10 year moving 
Glen Canyon Dam Average Monthly 

Most Probably Hydrology (based on August 2002 Final 

0

2000400060008000

10000120001400016000

Oct-01

Nov-01

Dec-01

Jan-02

Feb-02

Mar-02

Apr-02

May-02

Jun-02

Jul-02

Aug-02

Sep-02

Oct-02

Nov-02

Dec-02

Jan-03

Average CFS

Without Experimental Flows

Scenario 1 Experimental Flows
Lake Powell Projected Elevatio

Based on August 2002 Final Forecast

36003610362036303640365036603670368036903700

Jan-02

Feb-02

Mar-02

Apr-02

May-02

Jun-02

Jul-02

Aug-02

Sep-02

Oct-02

Nov-02

Dec-02

Jan-03

Feb-03

Mar-03

Apr-03

M03

Feet

Without Experimental Flow

Scenario 1 Experimental F

Lake Powell Water Surface Ele

Based on August 2002 Final Fo
200

Co

Ap

Unr

I

Flaming 

Blue M

Navajo 

Lake P
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1865

To amend title IV of the Social Security Act to provide safeguards against

the abuse of information reported to the National Directory of New Hires.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 26, 1998

Mr. BAUCUS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend title IV of the Social Security Act to provide

safeguards against the abuse of information reported

to the National Directory of New Hires.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safeguard of New Em5 ployee Information Act of 1998’’.

6 SEC. 2. PENALTY FOR UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS, DISCLO7 SURE, OR USE OF INFORMATION.

8 Section 453(l) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

9 653(l)) is amended—
2

•S 1865 IS

1 (1) by striking ‘‘Information’’ and inserting the

2 following:

3 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Information’’; and

4 (2) by adding at the end the following:

5 ‘‘(2) PENALTY FOR MISUSE OF INFORMATION

6 IN THE NATIONAL DIRECTORY OF NEW HIRES.—The

7 Secretary shall require the imposition of an adminis8 trative penalty (up to and including dismissal from

9 employment), and a fine of $1,000, for each act of

10 unauthorized access to, disclosure of, or use of, in11 formation in the National Directory of New Hires

12 established under subsection (i) by any officer or

13 employee of the United States who knowingly and

14 willfully violates this paragraph.’’.

15 SEC. 3. 24-MONTH LIMIT ON RETENTION OF NEW HIRE

16 DATA.

17 Section 453(i)(2) of the Social Security Act (42

18 U.S.C. 653(i)(2)) is amended to read as follows:

19 ‘‘(2) DATA ENTRY AND DELETION REQUIRE20 MENTS.—Information shall be—

21 ‘‘(A) entered into the database maintained

22 by the National Directory of New Hires within

23 2 business days of receipt pursuant to section

24 453A(g)(2); and
3

•S 1865 IS

1 ‘‘(B) deleted from such database 24

2 months after the date of entry.’’.

3 SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

4 The amendments made by sections 2 and 3 shall take

5 effect on January 1, 1999.

Æ
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata and coll ateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 10/3/96 TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. JEFFREY LYN PIERCE,

Defendant-Appellant. No. 96-7037 (E. Dist. of Oklahoma) (D.C. No. CR-95-36-S)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before ANDERSON , BARRETT , and MURPHY , Circuit Judges.
Having examined the briefs and the appellate record , this panel determines unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. This case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.-2-

Mr. Pierce pleaded guilty to racketeering, conspira cy to defraud, and forfeiture. As part of the sentence, the district court fined Mr. Pierce $15,000 and ordered payment in $450 monthly installments beginn ing 90 days after release from custody. Mr. Pierce appeals the fine. He arg ues that the district court failed to consider various factors bearing upon ability to pay, as mandated by Section 5E1.2(d) of the Sentencing Guidelines. This court normally reviews appeals of fines under an abuse of discretion standard. United States v. Ballard, 16 F.3d 1110, 1114 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 2762 (1994). The Guidelines mandate only that the district court consider 5E1.2(d) factors, notthat it make any express findings. See United States v. Sneed , 34 F.3d 1570, 1585 (10th Cir. 1993). Compliance with the G uidelines merely requires the record to reflect that the district court considere d the pertinent factors before it imposed the fine. Id. In this case, the district court made it amply clea r that it had considered Mr. Pierce’s circumstances. Addressing Mr. Pierce, the court said, “This fine is imposed based on your current financial profile and your projected earning ability.” Furthermore, the court adopted by refere nce “all relevant factual matters set forth in the Presentence Investigation by refer ence.” The Presentence Report included a detailed account of Mr. Pierce’s financi al situation and a statement that-3-

Mr. Pierce did not have the “funds or liquid assets to pay a substantial fine at this time, without provisions made for a payment plan.” Accordingly, the district court imposed a fine at t he low end of the $6,000 to $60,000 Guideline range, granted a 90-day grace period, and implemented a reasonable monthly installment plan. The district court did not abuse its discretion. M r. Pierce’s sentence is therefore AFFIRMED
. ENTERED FOR THE COURT
Michael R. Murphy Circuit Judge
# L_2009019EN.01001101.xml

| 23.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 19/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 19/11

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 59/2009

of 22 January 2009

fixing the maximum export refund for skimmed milk powder in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 619/2008

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1), and in particular Article 164(2), in conjunction with Article 4, thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 619/2008 of 27 June 2008 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds concerning certain milk products (2) provides for a standing invitation to tender procedure. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 619/2008 of 27 June 2008 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds concerning certain milk products (2) provides for a standing invitation to tender procedure.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 6 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1454/2007 of 10 December 2007 laying down common rules for establishing a tender procedure for fixing export refunds for certain agricultural products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for the tendering period ending on 20 January 2009. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 6 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1454/2007 of 10 December 2007 laying down common rules for establishing a tender procedure for fixing export refunds for certain agricultural products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for the tendering period ending on 20 January 2009.

| (3) | The Management Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its Chair, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Management Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its Chair,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the standing invitation to tender opened by Regulation (EC) No 619/2008, for the tendering period ending on 20 January 2009, the maximum amount of refund for the products and destinations referred to in Article 1(c) and in Article 2 of that Regulation shall be EUR 20/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 23 January 2009.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 January 2009.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 168, 28.6.2008, p. 20.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 325, 11.12.2007, p. 69.

3

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           9,441
<SECURITIES>                                    18,133
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,569
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,702
<INVENTORY>                                      3,581
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         757,140
<DEPRECIATION>                                 347,413
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,231,400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,341,529
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                    (283,353)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,231,400
<SALES>                                        332,136
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               332,136
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  282,307
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,763
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              91,820
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (75,533)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,434
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (62,099)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   1,153
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (60,946)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        



</TABLE>
Order entered December 4 , 2013

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 13

- 01379

- CV

AUTOBUSES EJECUTIVOS , LLC AND

OMNIBUS MEXICANOS, S A DE CV, Petitioners

V.

AGUSTINA CUEVAS, IND IVIDUALLY AND AS NEX T FRIEND

OF G.C., A MINO R; AND MONICA CUEVAS , INDIVIDUALLY ;

MARIA ROSALINA PEREZ , INDIVIDUALLY AND A S

NEXT FRIEND OF C.P., JR. AND A.P., MINORS

, Respondents

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 12

- 07459



### O RDER

Based on our opinion of today’s date, we DENY petitioners’ petition for permissive

appeal and motion to stay

. We ORDER that petitioners bear the costs of this appeal.

/s/ MICHAEL J. O'NEILL

JUSTICE
PURGATOIRE RIVER NEAR THATCHER, CO.Latitude: 37.356Longitude: -103.9Elevation: 4790

PURGATOIRE RIVER NEAR THATCHER, CO.

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Apishapa Site Page...



Apishapa

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Culebra #2 Site Page...



Culebra #2

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Whiskey Ck Site Page...



Whiskey Ck
#### William Long et al. *v.*Edward P. Loughlin

*Patrick J. Flaherty,*for the appellee (defendant).

*Edward W. Hebh,*for the appellants (plaintiffs).

Argued March 4

decided March 4, 1975

The defendant’s motion to dismiss the appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Tolland County is denied.
#### People *ex rel.*Waterman v. Schellenger *et al.,*Highway Commissioners.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.*

May 12, 1890.)

The writ of *certiorari*in this case was issued, upon the relation of Henry Waterman against H. B. Schellenger and others, highway commissioners of the town of Southold, in the county of Suffolk, to review their determination in laying out a highway through the inclosed lands of relator.

Argued before Barnard, P. J., and Dykman and Pratt, JJ.

*Payne & Benjamin,*for relator. *Albertson Case, (J. H. TutMll,*of counsel,) for respondents.

Barnard, P. J.

It is not the object of a writ of *certiorari,*to reverse proceedings to open highways, that the return should state facts outside of those which show jurisdiction. The return must give the record only. In this case the record “properly included the application, the certificate of the freeholders, and the order of the commissioners, or, at most, a history and recital of all the official acts of the commissioners in the course of the proceedings. ” *People*v. *Wheeler,*21 N. Y. 82. The return shows no error in the proceedings. The jury was drawn in the manner required by law. The names of all persons on the jury-lists of the town were put in a box, and a jury of twelve drawn therefrom. One person declined to serve and was not sworn, and no objection was made to any other person. Ten of the jurors signed the certificate. The commissioners therefore made the order laying out the road. The return does not show an orchard, if it is proper that the commissioners should determine that question. There are a few wild apple and cherry trees along the fence, and 10 prickly pear trees. The apples are wild natural growth trees, and the return states that the trees do not constitute, in whole or in. part, an orchard. The finding of the jury, and the decision of the commissioners upon the question, should be upheld. *People*v. *Commissioners,*57 N. Y. 549. The judgment should therefore be affirmed, with costs. All concur.
HORSE CREEK AT HIGHWAY 194  Latitude: 38.085Longitude: -103.353Elevation: 3983

Horse Creek at Highway 194
# L_2015127DE.01006201.xml

| 22.5.2015 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 127/62 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2015

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 127/62

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 552/2009 der Kommission vom 22. Juni 2009 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1907/2006 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates zur Registrierung, Bewertung, Zulassung und Beschränkung chemischer Stoffe (REACH) hinsichtlich Anhang XVII

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 164 vom 26. Juni 2009
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 164 vom 26. Juni 2009

Seite 25, Anhang, Ziffer 2, Tabelle, Spalte 1, Eintragung unter „49. Trichlorbenzol“:

anstatt:

„CAS-Nr. 108-88-3

EG-Nr. 203-625-9“

muss es heißen:

„CAS-Nr. 120-82-1

EG-Nr. 204-428-0“

.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF DECORATIVE HOME ACCENTS, INC. FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,453
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,254
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,194
<INVENTORY>                                     35,599
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66,106
<PP&E>                                          40,677
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (8,771)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 119,185
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          141,369
<BONDS>                                        118,100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           51,453
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                   (116,963)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   119,185
<SALES>                                         35,897
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                35,897
<CGS>                                           27,826
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,826
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,390
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (5,196)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    789
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                789
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  3,556
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       789
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Case 3:16-cv-00483-SI    Document 70    Filed 03/22/17    Page 1 of 3

Case 3:16-cv-00483-SI    Document 70    Filed 03/22/17    Page 2 of 3

Case 3:16-cv-00483-SI    Document 70    Filed 03/22/17    Page 3 of 3
Aboriginal    Boundary
 
August 2015 River Trip‐Navajo Nation Historic Pres

Department
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MAX ZWEIZIG, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

TIMOTHY C. ROTE, 

Defendant-Appellant, 

and 

NORTHWEST DIRECT TELESERVICES, 

INC.; et al., 

Defendants.

No. 18-35991 

D.C. No. 3:15-cv-02401-HZ 

District of Oregon, 

Portland 

ORDER

Before: WOLLMAN,* FERNANDEZ, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no 

judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. 

P. 35. 

The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.

* The Honorable Roger L. Wollman, United States Circuit Judge for the 

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.

FILED

JUL 23 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

Case 3:15-cv-02401-HZ Document 350 Filed 07/23/20 Page 1 of 1