alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

          - [RTID: 0648-XB389]

# AGENCY:

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice; public meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The MAFMC's Spiny Dogfish Monitoring Committee will meet via webinar to develop recommendations for Spiny Dogfish specifications.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on Monday, September 20, 2021, from 1:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

                        The meeting will be held via webinar. Details on the proposed agenda, connection information, and briefing materials will be posted via the MAFMC website calendar at:                         *https://www.mafmc.org/​council-events.*

*Council address:*                         Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 674-2331;                         *www.mafmc.org.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D., Executive Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, telephone: (302) 526-5255.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Spiny Dogfish Monitoring Committee will meet to review annual specifications and management measures and make any appropriate recommendations for future Spiny Dogfish specifications.

## Special Accommodations

The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aid should be directed to Shelley Spedden at (302) 526-5251, at least 5 days prior to any meeting date.

*Authority:*16 U.S.C. 1801*et seq.*

Dated: August 30, 2021.

Tracey L. Thompson,

Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 2021-18993 Filed 9-1-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
#### J.A.O. Acquisition Corp. et al., Appellants, v Jeffrey D. Stavitsky et al., Defendants, and First Union National Bank, Formerly Known as CoreStates Bank, N.A., Respondent. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Submitted March 26, 2007;

decided April 26, 2007

Motion for reargument denied *[see 8*NY3d 144],
GCMRC, Cooperator, and Tribal River Trips and Field Activities

Postponed or Cancelled in 2020

• Navajo did not schedule any trips for 2020 

Original 

Trip Dates

Cancelled or 

Postponed Project Number, Agency, and Project Description

4/1-4/13 Cancelled Project I, AZGFD, Mainstem Fish Monitoring 

4/8-4/14 Postponed Project H, GCMRC, Trout Growth and Recruitment in Glen 

Canyon: Launched June 19

4/7-4/17 Postponed Project F, GCMRC, Aquatic Food Base: Launched July 10

4/14/-4/24 Cancelled Project G, USFWS, Humpback Chub Monitoring LCR

4/18-4/27 Cancelled Pueblo of Zuni, Cultural Resources Monitoring

4/16-5/1 Postponed Project B, GCMRC, Survey Control Network: Postponed to 

2021

4/22-5/12 Cancelled Project G, GCMRC, Juvenile Chub Monitoring

5/6-5/15 Cancelled Hopi Tribe, Cultural Resources Monitoring

5/15-6/3 Postponed Project D, GCMRC, Cultural Resources Monitoring:

Launched June 16

4/30-5/5 Cancelled Project F, GCMRC, Aquatic Food Base

5/12-5/22 Cancelled Project G, USFWS, Humpback Chub Monitoring LCR

5/20-6/1 Postponed Project I, AZGFD, Mainstem Fish Monitoring: 

Launched June 21

5/28-6/14 Postponed Project I, GCMRC, Environmental DNA Sampling

(partially funded by GCDAMP): Postponed to 2021

5/29-6/5 Postponed Project G, GCMRC, LCR MUX Antenna Installation

(partially funded by GCDAMP): Launched November 4

6/6-6/17 Cancelled Hualapai Tribe, Cultural Resources Monitoring

6/11-6/26

7/9-7/24 Cancelled Partners in Science, Grand Canyon Youth

6/17-6/26 Cancelled Southern Paiute Consortium, Cultural Resources 

Monitoring

6/25-7/3 Postponed Project G, GCMRC, LCR Juvenile HBC Monitoring: One 

quarter of work completed on JCM trip Jul 7-13

8/14-8/18 Cancelled Project F, GCMRC, Lees Ferry Aquatic Food Base 

Monitoring
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF DECORATIVE HOME ACCENTS, INC. FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                     1,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,916
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,661
<INVENTORY>                                     47,705
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                88,756
<PP&E>                                          34,521
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,895
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 222,204
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,770
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           43,123
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,864
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   222,204
<SALES>                                         38,783
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,783
<CGS>                                           28,836
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,736
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,605
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,394)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,106)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,288)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7274

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CLIFTON JERMAINE SWINTON, a/k/a Compton,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District 

Judge. (4:09-cr-01145-TLW-1)

Submitted: November 19, 2015 Decided: November 24, 2015

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clifton Jermaine Swinton, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley 

Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Clifton Jermaine Swinton appeals the district court’s order 

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) motion for a sentence reduction. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. United States v. Swinton, No. 4:09-cr-01145-TLW-1 

(D.S.C. July 29, 2015). We deny Swinton’s motions for a 

transcript at government expense and to appoint counsel, and 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-14-00757-CV

IN RE David M. GARZA

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 3, 2014

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On October 29, 2014, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has 

considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled 

to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2013-CI-19608, styled David Garza v. Dennis Gutzman, et al., pending in 

the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe presiding.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 STATEMENT OF
 PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 I, Kanwar J. S. Chadha, certify that pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:
 
 The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended April 30, 2004 of Entrada Networks, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended April 30, 2004 of Entrada Networks, Inc. fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Entrada Networks, Inc.
 
 
 _/s/ Kanwar J. S. Chadha ___
 Name: Kanwar J. S. Chadha, Ph.D.
 President and Chief Executive Officer
 Date: June 14, 2004
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 

86 FR 47498.

# PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING: 

Tuesday, August 31, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. and its continuation at the conclusion of the open meeting on September 2, 2021.

# CHANGES IN THE MEETING: 

This meeting will also discuss:

Matters relating to internal personnel decisions, or internal rules and practices.

Matters which involve the consideration of a proceeding of a formal nature by the Commission against a specific person or the formal censure of any person.

Information of which disclosure would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy.

Information the premature disclosure of which would be likely to have a considerable adverse effect on the implementation of a proposed Commission action.

* * * * *

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Vicktoria J. Allen,

Acting Deputy Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2021-19025 Filed 8-30-21; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
# L_2009074EN.01001101.xml

| 20.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 74/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 74/11

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 229/2009

of 19 March 2009

on the issue of import licences for applications lodged during the first seven days of March 2009 under the tariff quota opened by Regulation (EC) No 1383/2007 for poultrymeat originating in Turkey

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1383/2007 of 26 November 2007 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 779/98 as regards opening and providing for the administration of certain quotas for imports into the Community of poultrymeat products originating in Turkey (2), and in particular Article 5(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EC) No 1383/2007 opened tariff quotas for imports of poultrymeat products. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 1383/2007 opened tariff quotas for imports of poultrymeat products.

| (2) | The applications for import licences lodged during the first seven days of March 2009 for the subperiod from 1 April to 30 June 2009 do not cover the quantities available. The quantities for which applications have not been lodged should therefore be determined and these should be added to the quantity fixed for the following quota subperiod, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The applications for import licences lodged during the first seven days of March 2009 for the subperiod from 1 April to 30 June 2009 do not cover the quantities available. The quantities for which applications have not been lodged should therefore be determined and these should be added to the quantity fixed for the following quota subperiod,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The quantities for which import licence applications pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1383/2007 under the quota with order number 09.4103 have not been lodged, to be added to the subperiod from 1 July to 30 September 2009, shall be 500 000 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 20 March 2009.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 March 2009.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 309, 27.11.2007, p. 34.

2

---
#### MONTGOMERY v. RYAN et al.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.

December 2, 1895.)

Action by George O. Montgomery against William J. Ryan and another.

Hyland & Zabriskie, for appellants.

Gustave S. Drachman, for respondent.

DYKMAN, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to change the place of trial of this action from the county of Westchester tp the county of New York. There is no merit in the appeal, and the order should be affirmed, with $Í0 costs and disbursements.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 28, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-10926 Conference Calendar

HAROLD E. WHITMORE, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus COLE JETER, Warden, Federal Medical Center, Fort Worth, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:05-CV-839

-------------------- Before DAVIS, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Harold E. Whitmore, federal prisoner # 24891-077, was convicted in 1994 of drug-trafficking offenses and money laundering, for which he received concurrent 240-month prison terms. He appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition, arguing that his sentence was illegal because it was based on facts not submitted to the jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt, in violation of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Whitmore arguesNo. 05-10926 -2- that his claims should be allowed to proceed under the savings clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Whitmore’s argument is unavailing in light of this court’s decision in Padilla v. United States , 416 F.3d 424, 426-27 (5th Cir. 2005).
AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

SAMUEL R. QUEEN, 

WARDEN IVES, 

FCI SHERIDAN, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

Respondent. 

Coffin, Magistrate Judge. 

3:16-cv-00373-TC 

FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION 

Petitioner, an inmate at FCI Sheridan, filed a petition 

under 28 U.S.C. 2241 challenging a disciplinary sanction he 

received involving possession of stolen property and 

possession of a stolen tool. 

The record reflects that the petition in this csae 

asserts identical claims he already submitted in Queen v. 

Warden Graber, case number 15-cv-00916-AA which is currently 

1 - FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

Case 3:16-cv-00373-TC Document 8 Filed 11/03/16 Page 1 of 3
pending review in the Ninth Circuit Appeal No. 16-35-154. 

It is well settled that petitioner does not have a right 

to file duplicative in forma pauperis actions where the 

allegations merely "repeat pending or previously litigated 

claims." Cato v. United States, 70 F.3d 1103, 1105 (9th Cir. 

1995) . 

Petitioner's Petition ( #1) should be denied as 

duplicative. 

The Clerk of the Court should be directed to enter a 

judgment dismissing this proceeding 

This recommendation is not an order that is immediately 

appealable to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Any notice 

of appeal pursuant to Rule 4(a) (1), Federal Rules of Appellate 

Procedure, should not be filed until entry of the district 

court's judgment or appealable order. The parties shall have 

fourteen (14) days from the date of service of a copy of this 

recommendation within which to file specific written 

objections with the court. Thereafter, the parties have 

fourteen ( 14) days within which to file a response to the 

objections. Failure to timely file objections to any factual 

determinations of the Magistrate Judge will be considered a 

waiver of a party's right to de novo consideration of the 

factual issues and will constitute a waiver of a party's right 

to appellate review of the findings of fact in an order or 

2 - FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

Case 3:16-cv-00373-TC Document 8 Filed 11/03/16 Page 2 of 3
judgment entered pursuant to the Magistrate Judge's 

recommendation. 

Certificate 0£ Appea1abi1ity 

Shou1dpetitioner appea1, a certificate 0£ appea1abi1ity 

shou1d be denied as petitioner has not .made a substantia1 

showing 0£ the denia1 0£ a constitutiona1 right. See, 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2). 

DATED this 

Nov 3 day of ~r, 

Thomas 

United 

3 - FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

2016. 

Judge 

Case 3:16-cv-00373-TC Document 8 Filed 11/03/16 Page 3 of 3
#### BROWN v. JAMES et al.

(Supreme Oourt, Appellate Division, Second Department.

Octo*1108ber 6, 1896.)

Action by Timothy Y. Brown against Joshua James and Asa Gibbons.

William C. Kellogg, for appellant.

John F. Brennan, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This action is brought to recover against the appellant, Gibbons, as indorser of a promissory note. This case has been before us on a previous appeal. On the first trial of the action a verdict was directed in favor of the plaintiff. On appeal, this judgment was reversed, the court holding that the case should have been submitted to the jury. 2 App. Div. 105, 37 N. Y. Supp. 529. On the second trial, the cause was submitted to the jury, who found a verdict for the plaintiff. There is but little in this case to review. We cannot pass on the question of fact, because there is no certificate that the case contains all the evidence. To sustain his defense it was incumbent on the appellant to show that his indorsement was procured by fraud. The proof on this subject wholly rested upon his own testimony and that of his co-defendant, James. Being the testimony of parties in interest, and incapable of direct contradiction by the plaintiff, the question of fact raised by this evidence was properly submitted to the jury to pass upon. No motion was made to direct a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. No exception was taken to the charge of the -court. It is not necessary for us to determine whether the facts proved constituted the plaintiff a holder for value, because, in response to the request of the defendant, the court charged that, if the appellant was induced to sign the note by false representation of James, then the plaintiff was not a bona fide holder, and could not recover. It is true that in previous portions of the charge the court had instructed the jury that the plaintiff could not recover in case the indorsement was obtained by fraud, unless he established that he was a holder for value; but no exception was taken to this submission to the jury of the question whether the plaintiff was a bona fide holder for value, and the direct instruction that he was not, made in answer to the defendant’s request to charge, eliminated the question from the case. The record before us, therefore, presents no question of law calling for our determination. The judgment and order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.