alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 New England Plant, Soil and Water Research Laboratory: Orono, ME
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Orono, Maine New England Plant, Soil and Water Research Laboratory Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Collaborations The New England Plant, Soil and Water Research Laboratory has a long and productive history of collaborative research involving stakeholders.  Current collaborators and projects:  Enhancing Soil Health in Potato Production by Applying Soil Amendments and Manipulating Post-Fumigation microbiomes  Enhancing Soil Health in Potato Production by Applying Soil Amendments and Manipulating Post-Fumigation Microbiomes


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Willie Robertson, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Delin, J.), rendered December 14, 1984, convicting him of attempted burglary in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s argument, his guilt was established beyond a reasonable doubt through the testimony of his accomplice and the independently sufficient testimony of a State Trooper *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620). Mangano, J. P., Weinstein, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.
# L_2009111EN.01000101.xml

| 5.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 111/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 111/1

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 361/2009

of 4 May 2009

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in particular Article 138(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 5 May 2009.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 May 2009.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.

2

---

ANNEX

Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

| (EUR/100 kg) |
| --- |
| CN code | Third country code (1) | Standard import value |
| 0702 00 00 | JO | 88,9 |
| MA | 82,7 |
| TN | 139,0 |
| TR | 132,5 |
| ZZ | 110,8 |
| 0707 00 05 | JO | 155,5 |
| MA | 32,7 |
| TR | 129,1 |
| ZZ | 105,8 |
| 0709 90 70 | JO | 216,7 |
| TR | 114,9 |
| ZZ | 165,8 |
| 0805 10 20 | EG | 44,2 |
| IL | 55,7 |
| MA | 51,6 |
| TN | 64,9 |
| TR | 55,0 |
| US | 51,9 |
| ZZ | 53,9 |
| 0805 50 10 | TR | 47,0 |
| ZA | 52,3 |
| ZZ | 49,7 |
| 0808 10 80 | AR | 83,4 |
| BR | 72,6 |
| CA | 114,7 |
| CL | 78,1 |
| CN | 89,0 |
| MK | 33,9 |
| NZ | 107,6 |
| US | 124,6 |
| UY | 70,5 |
| ZA | 79,5 |
| ZZ | 85,4 |

(EUR/100 kg)

CN code

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

0702 00 00

JO

88,9

MA

82,7

TN

139,0

TR

132,5

ZZ

110,8

0707 00 05

JO

155,5

MA

32,7

TR

129,1

ZZ

105,8

0709 90 70

JO

216,7

TR

114,9

ZZ

165,8

0805 10 20

EG

44,2

IL

55,7

MA

51,6

TN

64,9

TR

55,0

US

51,9

ZZ

53,9

0805 50 10

TR

47,0

ZA

52,3

ZZ

49,7

0808 10 80

AR

83,4

BR

72,6

CA

114,7

CL

78,1

CN

89,0

MK

33,9

NZ

107,6

US

124,6

UY

70,5

ZA

79,5

ZZ

85,4

---

(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
  ZZ
  ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

---
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1938 

To amend the Inspector General Act of 1978 to increase transparency of 

the Inspectors General, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 22, 2015 

Mr. KIND (for himself, Mr. RIBBLE, Mr. RYAN of Wisconsin, Mr. POCAN, Ms. 

MOORE, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. GROTHMAN, and Mr. DUFFY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To amend the Inspector General Act of 1978 to increase 

transparency of the Inspectors General, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Inspectors General 

5 Transparency Act of 2015’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1938 IH

1 SEC. 2. DUTY TO SUBMIT AND MAKE AVAILABLE TO THE 

2 PUBLIC WORK PRODUCT. 

3 Section 4 of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 

4 U.S.C. App.) is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘(e)(1) Whenever an Inspector General, in carrying 

7 out the duties and responsibilities established under this 

8 Act, issues a work product the Inspector General shall— 

9 ‘‘(A) submit the work product to— 

10 ‘‘(i) the head of each establishment re11 viewed in the work product; 

12 ‘‘(ii) the Committee on Homeland Security 

13 and Governmental Affairs and the Committee 

14 on Appropriations of the Senate; 

15 ‘‘(iii) the Committee on Oversight and 

16 Government Reform and the Committee on Ap17 propriations of the House of Representatives; 

18 ‘‘(iv) the congressional committees of juris19 diction; 

20 ‘‘(v) if the work product was initiated upon 

21 request by an individual or entity other than 

22 the Inspector General, that individual or entity; 

23 and 

24 ‘‘(vi) any Member of Congress upon re25 quest; and 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1938 IH

1 ‘‘(B) not later than 3 days after the work prod2 uct is submitted in final form to the head of the es3 tablishment, post the work product on the website of 

4 the Office of Inspector General. 

5 ‘‘(2) Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to 

6 authorize the public disclosure of information that is spe7 cifically prohibited from disclosure by any other provision 

8 of law.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Adopt-A-Beach

State of the beaches, 2022
AAB tracts 44 beaches, so our examples are only 

a small subset of the impacted beaches.
Nautiloid Canyon, river mile 35 left: 2018-2021

2018 2021
Tatahatso RM 

37.9 left

Early 2021

(top photos)

Post monsoon 

photos, late 2021 

Beach destruction 

comparison 

(above)
Martha’s, RM 38.6 left

2021 before and after
Lower Garnet, 115.1 Left

Left photo shows the main camp in early 2021, right photo is a close-up of the post monsoon season, late 2021
Lower Tapeats, river mile 134.5- right

Left photo taken in 2000, right photo in 2021. Note general scouring of all sand, over time
Olo, river mile 148 left

Both photos show lower beach, left photo taken in 2018, right photo in 2021
Matkat Hotel, river mile 148.9 left

Photos (top left) taken in 2018, (upper and lower 

right) taken in 2021. Notice the gully caused by 

monsoon storms. While this is still campable, 

Matkat has gotten pretty sporty..
Last Chance, river mile 156.2 right

Left photo taken in 2014, right photo taken in 2021.
Tuckup Canyon, river mile 165.1 right

3 photos of Tuckup, 2021. Upper left shows spring 

conditions, middle and left photos from fall- demonstrating 

that monsoon storms affected beaches canyon wide.
National Canyon, river mile 167 left

Upper photos taken early 

2021, lower photos taken in 

late 2021. Note the missing 

sand in lower photos.
Repeat photography from GCMRC, river mile 44.5-

starting from after the spring 2021 pulse flow, then from September 

2021, then from February 2022

Preliminary 

data
State of the Beaches: 2022 Conclusion

● As we know, the monsoon season 2021 deposited the 2nd most sand through 

the Paria, since we started measuring this deposit.

● No HFE was conducted in 2021

● Camping beaches along the CRE support recreation, but also indicate the 

health of the ecosystem

● This mega-drought and the Basin Fund were stated reasons for not 

conducting the fall HFE of 2021

● LTEMP/ HFE protocols allow HFE’s while sending the same amount of water 

downstream in a water year as not conducting an HFE

● Conducting HFE’s supports science and the Grand Canyon Protection Act

● HFE’s are one of our strongest tools available to mitigate negative impacts 

from the dam, especially when followed by lower fluctuations

● Climate change will require creative solutions to balance all resources
#### Cohen Tauber Spievak & Wagner, LLP, Respondent, v Jeffrey Alnwick et al., Appellants.

Submitted November 27, 2006;

decided January 16, 2007

*841Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Order issued October 11,2012

In The

(!niirt tif Apticals

Fift1! Oiatrirt uf rxa at a11ui

No. 05-10-00676-CV

IISBC BANK USA, N.A., AS INDENTURE TRUSTEE OF THE

FIELI)STONE MORTGAGE INVESTMENT TRUST, SERIES 2004--i AND

LITTON LOAN SERVICING, L.P., Appellants

V.

JEANIE WATSON, TONY WATSON, AND MATTHEW G. AIKEN, Appellees

ORDER

Be fore Justices Bridges. FitzGerald. and Lang

Appellees July 27, 2O2 motion for rehearing is DENIEI).

‘ 4KERRY TTl/ERAl D

JUSTICE
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1841 

To amend section 13 of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, known 

as the Volcker Rule, to exclude certain debt securities of collateralized 

loan obligations from the prohibition against acquiring or retaining an 

ownership interest in a hedge fund or private equity fund. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 16, 2015 

Mr. BARR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend section 13 of the Bank Holding Company Act 

of 1956, known as the Volcker Rule, to exclude certain 

debt securities of collateralized loan obligations from the 

prohibition against acquiring or retaining an ownership 

interest in a hedge fund or private equity fund. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Restoring Proven Fi5 nancing for American Employers Act’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 1841 IH

1 SEC. 2. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION RELATING TO 

2 COLLATERALIZED LOAN OBLIGATIONS. 

3 Section 13(c)(2) of the Bank Holding Company Act 

4 of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1851(c)(2)) is amended— 

5 (1) by striking ‘‘A banking entity or nonbank 

6 financial company supervised by the Board’’ and in7 serting the following: 

8 ‘‘(A) GENERAL CONFORMANCE PERIOD.— 

9 A banking entity or nonbank financial company 

10 supervised by the Board’’; and 

11 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(B) CONFORMANCE PERIOD FOR CERTAIN

13 COLLATERALIZED LOAN OBLIGATIONS.— 

14 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding 

15 subparagraph (A), a banking entity or 

16 nonbank financial company supervised by 

17 the Board shall bring its activities related 

18 to or investments in a debt security of a 

19 collateralized loan obligation issued before 

20 January 31, 2014, into compliance with 

21 the requirements of subsection (a)(1)(B) 

22 and any applicable rules relating to sub23 section (a)(1)(B) not later than July 21, 

24 2019. 

25 ‘‘(ii) COLLATERALIZED LOAN OBLIGA26 TION.—For purposes of this subparagraph, 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•HR 1841 IH

1 the term ‘collateralized loan obligation’ 

2 means any issuing entity of an asset3 backed security, as defined in section 

4 3(a)(77) of the Securities Exchange Act of 

5 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(77)), that is com6 prised primarily of commercial loans.’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM STATEMENTS
FROM THE NINE MONTH FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,267
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      258
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (35)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,497
<PP&E>                                             328
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (143)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,695
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              750
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          4
<COMMON>                                            23
<OTHER-SE>                                         918
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,695
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   741
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      462
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,789
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (18)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,492)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,492)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)


</TABLE>
Flaming Gorge Technical Working Group

Meeting Notes

Friday, July 28, 2017

In attendance: Heather Patno, Kevin McAbee, Jerry Wilhite, Crystal Dean, Ashley Nielson, 

Kevin Bestgen, Tom Chart, Don Anderson, Steve Hulet, Peter Crookston, Dave Speas, Larry 

Crist, Leslie Bennett

• Discussions were held regarding the scheduled dive requirements.

o Steve provided historical reference. In September 2014 a dive team originally 

discovered a cave that had formed 11 feet deep by 23 feet long where the hollow 

jets hit the surface. Not able to determine if this was natural or caused by erosion. 

Markers were placed and a dive scheduled for March 2017 to determine changes. 

This had to be rescheduled again to the week of 8/28/17.

o The dive team needs 800 cfs flow or lower to conduct inspection

o Maintenance issues are not covered under the ROD, only emergencies

o Normal procedure would require 32 days down and 32 days back up.

o Discussion of postponing the dive to next Spring 2018. The dive team has a very 

full schedule and will potentially face the same problems.

o Discussions of lowering cfs to just for the required 2-3 hours divers need.

o 2400 cfs is currently scheduled for Spring 2018

o Jerry, Chrystal and Heather will create a plan and send out to the group for 

approval. Steve will double check with the dive master regarding the total number 

of dive hours necessary.

o Not expecting to do another dive again for 5 years. Based on the results, may need 

to do one sooner. Prior to rescheduling any future dives the FGTWG will be 

consulted.

• A discussion of the current fish situation was held.

o As of July 2nd pike minnow were present

o Reproductive season is usually 4 weeks

o Drawing down now would cause dam safety issues as well as extend high flows 

into Winter season.

o Planning now for risk management and forecast uncertainty.

o Regarding dam safety we are still in a ‘wet’ year.

o This may end up the 2nd wettest year in the Upper Green.
Exhibit 15(a).3

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement Nos. 333-100030, 333-13938, 333-8420 and 333-5174 on
Form S-8 of our report dated June 24, 2005, except for the "Reclassifications" paragraph of Note 1, as to which the date is May 30, 2006, relating to the
consolidated financial statements of Dassault Systèmes, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Dassault Systèmes for the year ended
December 31, 2006.

Paris,
France

May 25,
2007

|/s/ Ernst & Young Audit |  | 
|----------------------- |  | 
|Represented by          |  | 
|Jean-Marc MONTSERRAT    |  | 

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ezra Grama, Appellant.

Since the defendant’s attorney raised the defenses of entrapment and duress during jury selection, during his opening statement and in cross-examination, the trial court did not err when it permitted evidence relating to the defendant’s criminal predisposition to be introduced on the People’s direct case *(see, People v Mann,*31 NY2d 253, 261; *People v Calvano,*30 NY2d 199, 205; *People v Frisbie,*115 AD2d 911, 912).

We have examined the defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit *(see, People v Pavao,*59 NY2d 282, 288-289; *People v Almodovar,*62 NY2d 126, 133; *People v Farrar,*52 NY2d 302, 305). Brown, J. P., Rubin, Lawrence and Hooper, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ANTONIO CONNOR,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 257 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Unpublished Memorandum and 

Order of the Superior Court at No. 

1015 EDA 2017 entered on May 31, 

2018, affirming the Order of the 

Philadelphia County Court of Common 

Pleas at No. CP-51-CR-0010553-

2014 entered on February 8, 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

GRANTED, the Superior Court’s order is VACATED, and this matter is REMANDED for 

proceedings consistent with this Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. Perfetto, ___ 

A.3d ___, 2019 WL 1866653 (Pa. Apr. 26, 2019).
EXHIBIT 31.2

           CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14 AND 15d-14
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Julie Seaman, Chief Financial Officer of US Global Nanospace, Inc. (the
"Company"), certify that:

         I have reviewed this amendment to the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A
of US Global Nanospace, Inc.

         Based on my knowledge, this amended quarterly report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report.

         Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in the report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
and for, the periods, presented in the report.

         The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 15(e) and 15d-1415(e)) for the Company and have:

                  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which the periodic report is
being prepared;

                  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

                  (c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the
Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
Company's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over
financial reporting; and

         The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Company's auditors and to the audit committee of the Company's board of
directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent function):

                  (i)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and

                  (ii) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's
internal control over financial reporting.


Dated:  June 1, 2005


/s/ Julie Seaman
------------------------------------
Julie Seaman
Chief Financial Officer