alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit      32.2 -**
**Certification      of Principal Financial Officer**

**CERTIFICATION      IN ACCORDANCE WITH**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED BY**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|         |                                                                                                                          |                                      |
|--------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|         |                                                                                                                          |
|    |                                                                                                                     |                                 |
|              |                                                                                                                          | /s/ Jennifer              S. LeBlanc |
|         | Jennifer                S. LeBlanc Chief                Financial Officer and SecretaryDate:                November 13, 2007 |
|         |                                                                                                                               |

----
# L_2009149EN.01006001.xml

| 12.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 149/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 149/60

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 496/2009

of 11 June 2009

amending Council Regulation (EC) No 872/2004 concerning further restrictive measures in relation to Liberia

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 872/2004 concerning further restrictive measures in relation to Liberia, (1) and in particular Article 11 (a) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 872/2004 lists the natural and legal persons, bodies and entities covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources under that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 872/2004 lists the natural and legal persons, bodies and entities covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources under that Regulation.

| (2) | On 12 May 2009, the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council decided to amend the identifying information of one person to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply. Annex I should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 12 May 2009, the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council decided to amend the identifying information of one person to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply. Annex I should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 872/2004 is hereby amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 June 2009.

For the Commission

Eneko LANDÁBURU

Director-General for External Relations

---

(1)  
  OJ L 162, 30.4.2004, p. 32.

1

---

ANNEX

Annex I to Council Regulation (EC) No 872/2004 is amended as follows:

The entry ‘Edwin M., Snowe jr. Nationality: Liberian. Passport number: (a) OR/0056672-01, (b) D/005072, (c) D-00172 (ECOWAS-DPL Passport, valid 7.8.2008-6.7.2010).’ Other information: Managing Director of the Liberian Petroleum and Refining Corporation (LPRC), shall be replaced by the following:

‘Edwin M., Snowe jr. Address: Elwa Road, Monrovia, Liberia. Date of birth: 11.2.1970. Place of birth: Mano River, Grand Cape Mount, Liberia. Nationality: Liberian. Passport number: (a) OR/0056672-01, (b) D/005072, (c) D005640 (diplomatic passport), (d) D-00172 (ECOWAS-DPL Passport, valid 7.8.2008-6.7.2010). Other information: Managing Director of the Liberian Petroleum and Refining Corporation (LPRC). Date of designation referred to in Article 6(b): 10.9.2004.’.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.01

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Transmeta Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q
being and as amended by this Form 10-Q/A referred to as the "Report"), I,
Matthew R. Perry, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company for the periods presented therein.

Date: November 10, 2004                By: /s/ MATTHEW R. PERRY
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer,
                                          Transmeta Corporation

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Transmeta Corporation and will be retained by Transmeta
Corporation and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

I,
Barney A. Richmond, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my
knowledge, the Quarterly Report of eCom eCom.com, Inc. on
Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2010, (i) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) that the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of eCom
eCom.com, Inc.



|                       |  |                              
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Date:
October 15, 2010 |  | /S/    BARNEY
A.
RICHMOND    
|                       |  | Barney A. Richmond           
|                       |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                       |  | (Principal Executive Officer)

I, Richard C. Turner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SectionSection 1350,
that, to my knowledge, the Quarterly Report of eCom eCom.com, Inc. on
Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2010, (i) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) that the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of eCom
eCom.com, Inc.



|                       |  |                              
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Date:
October 15, 2010 |  | /S/    RICHARD
C.
TURNER     
|                       |  | Richard C. Turner            
|                       |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|                       |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 10.1


 


ROSENTHAL & ROSENTHAL, INC.


1370
BROADWAY


NEW
YORK, NY 10018


 





	 	May
6, 2020









 


STEVEN MADDEN LTD.


STEVEN MADDEN RETAIL, INC.


DAMINEL M. FRIEDMAN
ASSOCIATES, INC.


DIVA ACQUISITION CORP.


SML ACQUISITION CORP.


DOLCE VITA FOOTWEAR,
INC.


DANIEL BARBARA ENTERPRISES, LLC


SCHWARTZ & BENJAMIN, INC.


BDS, INC.


QUINBY RIDGE
ENTERPRISES, LLC


REPORT FOOTWEAR, INC.


B.B. DAKOTA, INC.


GREATS BRAND INC.


52-16 Barnett
Avenue


Long Island City, NY 11104


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


Reference
is made to the Collection Agency Agreement entered into between Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc. and Steven Madden Ltd., dated
July 10, 2009, and joined by each of the other undersigned affiliates of Steven Madden Ltd., as amended and/or supplemented (the
“Agreement”). This will confirm that, effective the date hereof, Section 8.1 of the Agreement is hereby amended and
restated as follows:


 


“8.1.
Advances. In our sole discretion, in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, we will, from time to time, at your
request, subject to the terms of the Combined Charges Agreement, (i)  advance
to you sums (“Advances”); and/or (ii) cause to be opened for your account letters of credit issued by an L/C Bank
(“Letters of Credit”), provided that the aggregate amount of (x) the Advances outstanding will not, after giving
effect to such requested Advances, exceed the lesser of (a) 85% of the aggregate Net Amount of Eligible Receivables
outstanding at the time of such request, less Reserves, if any (the “Receivables Availability”); and (b)
$50,000,000 less the outstanding amount of undrawn Letters of Credit; and (y) the outstanding amount of undrawn Letters of
Credit will not, after giving effect to such requested Letters of Credit, exceed the lesser of (a) the Receivables
Availability; and (b) $15,000,000.”


 


Except
as hereinabove specifically set forth, all of the terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect,
and shall continue unmodified.





	 	 	 
	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	ROSENTHAL & ROSENTHAL,
    INC.
	 	 
	 	By: 	/s/ Gary
    Norman 
	 	Name: Gary Norman
	 	Title: Executive Vice President






    	 



    	 



    




Agreed:


 


STEVEN
MADDEN LTD.


STEVEN
MADDEN RETAIL, INC.


DAMINEL
M. FRIEDMAN ASSOCIATES ,
INC.


DIVA ACQUISITION CORP.


SML ACQUISITION
CORP.


DOLCE
VITA FOOTWEAR, INC.


DANIEL BARBARA ENTERPRISES
, LLC


SCHWARTZ & BENJAMIN, INC.


BDS,
INC.


QUINBY
RIDGE ENTERPRISES, LLC


REPORT FOOTWEAR,
INC.


B.B.
DAKOTA, INC.


GREATS BRAND INC.











	 	 	 
	By:  	/s/ Arvind Dharia	 
	Name: Arvind Dharia
	Title: CFO
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
JUVENTINO R ODAR TE,

Pla i ntiff-Appe lla

nt,
v. ALAM EDA C OUNTY, a public e n tity ; e t a l., De fe nda

n ts-Appe lle e s. No. 15-17126 D.C . No. 4:14-c v-00468-KAW
M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Northe rn Distric t of C a lifornia K andis A. W e stm ore , M a gistra te Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d April 18, 2017 ** San Fran c isc o , C a lifornia B e fore : D.W . NELSON a nd IKUTA, C irc uit Judge s, a nd B UR GESS, *** C hie f Distric t Judge
. 

# F IL ED
APR 24 2017 M OLLY C. DW Y E R, CLERK U. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3.

* * The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).

* * * The Honora

ble Tim othy

M . B urge ss, Unite d State s C hie f Distric t Judge for the Distric t of Ala ska , sitting by de signa t ion.Juve ntino Roda rte (“ R oda

rte ” ) a ppe a l s the distric t c ourt’ s orde r granting
sum m ary judgm e nt in fa

vor of Appe lle e s in his 42 U.S.C . § 1983 a c t ion a lle ging
e xc e ssive forc e . W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a nd we a ffirm
. B e c a use the pa rtie s a re fam i lia r with thefa c t s, we do not re c ount the m he re . The distric t c ourt prope rly grante d sum

m a ry judgm e nt in fa

vor of Appe lle e s be c a use R oda rte fa ile d to ra i se a

ge nuine dispute of m ate ria l fa c t a s to whe t he r the De puty She riffs’ use of a

polic e c an ine to e ffe c tuate R o da rte ’ s a rre st wa s obje c tive ly

re a sona b l e unde r the c irc um sta

nc e s. Se e Long v . C

ity & C ty
. of Honolulu , 511 F.3d 901, 905 (9th C ir. 2007). The distric t c ourt a l so prope rly grante d sum

m ary judgm e n t on the De puty She riffs’ qua lifie d im

m unity de fe nse be c a

use the ir c onduc t

did not viola

te R oda rte ’ s c le arly

e sta blishe d right to be

fre e from the use of e xc e ssive forc e during
an a rre st. Se e Gre e n v . C

ity & C ounty of San Franc isc o , 751 F.3d 1039, 1051–52 (9th C ir. 2014) (“ [A] n offic e r will be de n ie d qua lifie d im m unity in a § 1983 a c tion only if (1) the fa c ts a lle ge d, ta k e n in thelight m o st fa

vora ble to the pa

rty a sse rting injury , show tha

t the offic e r’ s c onduc t viola t e d a c onstitutiona

l right, a nd (2) the right a t issuewa s c le arly

e sta blishe d at the tim e of the inc ide nt suc h tha t a
re a s ona ble offic e r would ha

ve unde rstood he r c onduc t to be unla wful in tha

t situa tion.” ) (c ita

t ion a nd inte rna l quota

tion m arks om itte d). AFFIRM E D. 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21-0559 

# FILED

SERGIO VALDEZ SALAS,

Plaintiffand Appellant, 

### NOV 1 5 2021
Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Suprerne Court ShAto nf Montana

v. ORDER ARBY'S, Defendant and Appellee.

ThisCourt reviews briefs to ensure compliance with Rules 11 and 12 ofthe Montana Rules of Appellate Procedure. After reviewing the Appellant's opening brief filed on November 12, 2021, this Court has determined that the brief does not comply with the below-referenced Rules and must be resubmitted. M. R. App. P. 12(1)(a) requires a table ofcontents, with page references, and a table ofcases, statutes and other authorities cited, with referenced to the pages ofthe briefwhere they are cited. M. R. App. P. 12(1)(b) requires a statement ofissues presented for review. M. R. App. P. 12(1)(c) requires a statement ofthe case. The statement shall briefly indicate the nature of the case and its procedural disposition in the court below. Appellant's brief lacks any ofthe above elements. M. R. App. P. 12(1)(d) requires that the statement of facts portion ofa briefcontain references to the pages or the parts ofthe record at which material facts appear. Appellant's briefcontains no citations to any record. M. R. App. P. 12(1)(e) requires a statement ofthe standard of review for each issue presented, together with a citation of authority. Appellant's brief asserts no standard of review. M. R. App. P. 12(1)(f) requires a summary of the argument before the argument portion ofthebrief.The summaryofthe argument should include a heading identifying it as 11/15/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0559a separate section. The summary should be a clear and concise statement ofthe arguments

made in the body ofthe brief. The Appellant's briefmakes no summary ofthe argument. IT IS ORDERED that the referenced briefis rejected. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within ten (10) days ofthe date ofthis Order the Appellant shall file with the Clerk of this Court a revised brief containing the revisions necessary to complywith the specified Rules and that the Appellant shall serve copiesofthe revised briefon all parties ofrecord; IT IS FURTHERORDERED that no changes, additions,ordeletionsotherthan those specified in this Order may be made to the briefas originally filed; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the times for any subsequent briefing contained in M. R. App. P. 13 shall run from the date offiling ofthe revised brief. The Clerk is directed to mail a true copy of this Order to the Appellant and to all parties ofrecord. DATED this 15th day ofNovember, 2021. For the Court,

By Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-01-1994
<CASH>                                         104,816
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 104,816
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          26,345
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    96,400
<COMMON>                                       10,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     (28,429)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   104,816
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,950
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3,908
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,958)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-5184

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TIMOTHY EUGENE MOORE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees,

District Judge. (3:03-cr-00220-3)

Submitted: June 21, 2007 Decided: June 26, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

E. Fitzgerald Parnell, III, POYNER & SPRUILL, LLP, Charlotte, North

Carolina, for Appellant. Gretchen C. F. Shappert, United States

Attorney, Thomas Tullidge Cullen, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES

ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
*For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date

appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could

have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the

court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988).

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Eugene Moore seeks to appeal his 165-month

sentence following his guilty plea to conspiracy to possess crack,

cocaine, and marijuana with the intent to distribute. In criminal

cases, the defendant must file the notice of appeal within ten days

after the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A). With or

without a motion, upon a showing of excusable neglect or good

cause, the district court may grant an extension of up to thirty

days to file a notice of appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4); United

States v. Reyes, 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 1985).

The district court entered judgment on May 4, 2006. The

notice of appeal was filed on October 13, 2006.* Because Moore

failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension

of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Norwalk Federation of Teachers et al. *v.*Norwalk Board of Education

*Emanuel Margolis,*for the appellees (plaintiffs).

*Daniel E. Reed, Jr.,*for the defendant (appellant).

Argued April 1

decided April 1, 1975

The plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County at Stamford is granted.
(logo)Deloitte &
Touche LLP
                         Twenty-Fourth Floor           Telephone: (215) 246-2300
                         1700 Market Street            Facsimile: (215) 569-2441
                         Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-3984





INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT



To the Board of Directors of
  GMAC Mortgage Corporation:


We have examined management's  assertion about GMAC Mortgage  Corporation's (the
"Company")  compliance with the minimum  servicing  standards  identified in the
Mortgage Bankers Association of America's UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR
MORTGAGE  BANKERS (USAP) as of and for the year ended December 31, 1996 included
in the accompanying management assertion and appendix. Management is responsible
for the Company's  compliance with those  standards.  Our  responsibility  is to
express an opinion on  management's  assertion  about the  Company's  compliance
based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on a test basis,  evidence about the Company's  compliance  with the
minimum  servicing   standards  and  performing  such  other  procedures  as  we
considered  necessary  in the  circumstances.  We believe  that our  examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a
legal  determination  on the  Company's  compliance  with the minimum  servicing
standards.

In our opinion,  except as noted in the following  paragraph and in the appendix
to  management's  assertion  letter,  management's  assertion  that the  Company
complied with the aforementioned  minimum servicing  standards as of and for the
year ended December 31, 1996, is fairly stated in all material respects.

In two of thirty-two  selections made for collections  testing,  the Company did
not  satisfy  its  modification  of the  USAP  minimum  servicing  standard  for
contacting delinquent mortgagors within the prescribed time frames.

/s/Deloitte & Touche LLP


February 28, 1997



Doloitte Touche
Tohmatsu
International
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

November 23, 2011 

t1116 

Order 

 

November 23, 2011 

143265 

JOANN FINKBEINER, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 143265 

 COA: 297113 

Macomb CC: 2008-005383-NO 

TOWNSHIP OF CLINTON, 

Defendant, 

and 

BAKER COLLEGE OF CLINTON TOWNSHIP, 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 10, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

 HATHAWAY, J., would grant leave to appeal.