AFFIRMED and Opinion Filed June 29, 2021 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00361-CR No. 05-20-00362-CR No. 05-20-00363-CR No. 05-20-00365-CR No. 05-20-00366-CR No. 05-20-00367-CR No. 05-20-00368-CR MARCUS JOHNSON-MCBRYDE, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TE XAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. 380-83474-20 18; 380-81396-2019; 380-81395-2019; 199-83250-2018; 199- 83247-2018; 199-83246- 2018; 199-81278-2018 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Goldstein, and Smith Opinion by Justice Smith Marcus Johnson-McBryde appeals his assault of a public servant, two aggravated assaults of a public servant, unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, aggravated robbery, evading arrest, and r obbery convictions. Appellant’s appointed counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating that the records do not contain any reversible error that was preserved for appellate review. Counsel states in the brie f that he provided a ppellant with a copy–2– of the brief and counsel’s motion to withdr aw and advised appella nt of his right to examine the appellate records and file a pr o se response. In addition, this Court notified appellant of his right to examine the appellate records and file a pro se response. Appellant did not file a pro se response. The procedures established in Anders are applicable where, as here, the appellant’s appointed counsel concludes that there ar e no non-frivolous issues to assert on appeal. See In re D.D. , 279 S.W.3d 849, 849–50 (T ex. App.—Dallas 2009, pet. denied). This Court is not required to address the mer its of each claim raised in

an Anders brief or a pro se response. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 827 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); In re D.D. , 279 S.W.3d at 850. Instead, our duty is to determine whether there are any arguable grounds for revers al and, if so, to remand the case to the trial court so that new counsel may be appoi nted to address the issues.
See In re D.D. , 279 S.W.3d at 850. In the Anders brief, counsel for appellant presents a professional evaluation of the records demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds for reversal and concluding that appellant’s appeal s are frivolous and without merit. See Anders , 386 U.S. at 744. We independently revi ewed all the records and counsel’s Anders brief and agree that the ap peals are frivolous and without me rit. We find nothing in the records that could arguably support the appeals.–3– Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s judgments.

Do Not Publish T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47.2(b) 200361F.U05 /Crai g Smith / CRAIG SMITH JUSTICE–4– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
MARCUS JOHNSON-MCBRYDE, Appellant
No. 05-20-00361-CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 380-83474- 2018. Opinion delivered by Justice Smith. Justices Molberg and Goldstein participating. Based on the Court’s opinion of this da te, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED

. Judgment entered June 29, 2021–5– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
MARCUS JOHNSON-MCBRYDE, Appellant
No. 05-20-00362-CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 380-81396- 2019. Opinion delivered by Justice Smith. Justices Molberg and Goldstein participating. Based on the Court’s opinion of this da te, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED

. Judgment entered June 29, 2021–6– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
MARCUS JOHNSON-MCBRYDE, Appellant
No. 05-20-00363-CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 380-81395- 2019. Opinion delivered by Justice Smith. Justices Molberg and Goldstein participating. Based on the Court’s opinion of this da te, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED

. Judgment entered June 29, 2021–7– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
MARCUS JOHNSON-MCBRYDE, Appellant
No. 05-20-00365-CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 199-83250- 2018. Opinion delivered by Justice Smith. Justices Molberg and Goldstein participating. Based on the Court’s opinion of this da te, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED

. Judgment entered June 29, 2021–8– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
MARCUS JOHNSON-MCBRYDE, Appellant
No. 05-20-00366-CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 199-83247- 2018. Opinion delivered by Justice Smith. Justices Molberg and Goldstein participating. Based on the Court’s opinion of this da te, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED

. Judgment entered June 29, 2021–9– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
MARCUS JOHNSON-MCBRYDE, Appellant
No. 05-20-00367-CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 199-83246- 2018. Opinion delivered by Justice Smith. Justices Molberg and Goldstein participating. Based on the Court’s opinion of this da te, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED

. Judgment entered June 29, 2021–10– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
MARCUS JOHNSON-MCBRYDE, Appellant
No. 05-20-00368-CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 199-81278- 2018. Opinion delivered by Justice Smith. Justices Molberg and Goldstein participating. Based on the Court’s opinion of this da te, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED

. Judgment entered June 29, 2021.