alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 – ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS 

TO JUSTICE ACT

John E. Haapala, Jr.

OSB 061739

401 E. 10th Ave., Ste. 240

Eugene, OR 97401

Ph: 541-345-8474

Fax: 541-345-3237

jeh@haapalaw.com

Of attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON

TRACIE D. MOORE,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

CAROLYN COLVIN,

Commissioner, Social Security 

Administration,

 Defendant.

Case No. 6:15-cv-02418-SI

ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES 

PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO 

JUSTICE ACT

Based upon the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that, pursuant 

to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2412, an attorney fee in the amount of 

$6,495.93 shall be awarded to Plaintiff.

The parties agree that this award will be paid to Plaintiff’s attorney, dependent 

upon verification that Plaintiff has no debt which qualifies for offset against the award, 

pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff ,560 U.S. 586 

(2010). If Plaintiff has no such debt, then a check shall be made to Plaintiff’s attorney, 

and mailed directly to Plaintiff’s attorney at: 401 E. 10th Ave., Ste. 240, Eugene, OR 
2 – ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS 

TO JUSTICE ACT

97401. If Plaintiff has a debt, then a check for any remaining funds after offset of the 

debt shall be made to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff’s attorney’s office.

There are no other costs or expenses to be paid herein.

Dated this _____ of May 2017.

United States District Judge/Magistrate

Submitted by:

John E Haapala, OSB 061739

401 E. 10th Ave., Ste. 240

Eugene, OR 97401

Attorney for Plaintiff

9th

/s/ Michael H. Simon
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001000778
<NAME>                        Mariculture Systems, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Currency

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jul-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         5,800
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5,800
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 61,229
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          368,625
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       10,565
<OTHER-SE>                                     796,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   61,229
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               13,537
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (5,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (18,537)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (18,537)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.002)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.002)



</TABLE>
Glen Canyon Dam Technical Work Group Meeting 

November 4-5, 1997 

List of Attachments 

No. Title Author / Presenter 

1 TWG Minutes 

2 TWG Official Committee Members List 

3a 

3b 

Proposed Program Budgets: GC AMP 

USBR FY 1999 & FY2000 Program Formulation Calendar 

Bruce Moore 

4a 

4b 

4c 

GC AMP Roles, Responsibilities, Schedules and Process 

Integration 

Figure 1 

A “White Paper” for Implementing Adaptive Management 

Processes: Synopsis of April 4, 1997 Meeting 

C. Harris 

Dave Garrett 

5a 

5b 

5c 

5d 

5e 

5f 

5g 

5h 

5i 

5j 

5k 

5l 

Endangered Species Consultation Process 

Progress Review - Implementation of GCD Operations 

Biological Opinion 

Other Work Related to ES, The 1996 BO 

Federal Register 

Biological Assessment of a One Time Test of BHBF from GCD 

Spring 1996 

Categorical Exclusion Checklist 

Review of Sufficient Progress in Implementation of the elements 

of the Reasonable and Prudent Alternative from the Dec. 21, 

1994, BO on the Operations of Glen Canyon Dam 

Final Biological Opinion on the Operation of GCD 

Response to the Final Biological Opinion on the Operation of 

GCD (Feb 21, 1993-F-167) 

Biological and Conference Opinions on Operation of GCD - 

Controlled Release for Habitat and Beach Building (Feb. 16, 

1996) 

Review of Sufficient Progress (4/3/97) 

Nov. 1997 - Fall Test Flow from GCD 

Christine Karas 

6 Overhead Transparencies Ted Melis 

7 Issues Raised Outside the Constraints of GCDEIS ROD Randy Peterson 

8 

8a 

Report of the Spike Flow Subgroup 

Revised Summary Table 

Randy Peterson 

Wayne Cook 

9 

9a 

TWG Discussion Paper, Potential Spring 1998 AM Exper. Flow 

Resource Matrix 

Barry Gold 

10a 

10b 

10c 

10d 

10e 

Schedule for Development and Implementation of FY98 Prog. 

GCMRC Targets 

GCMRC - FY98 Biological Resources Prog. 

FY97 Report to Congress: Operations of the AMP Under the 

GCPA 

Draft: GCD 98 Annual Plan of Operations 

Dave Garrett 

Dave Garrett 

Barry Gold 

Dave Garrett 

Dave Garrett 

11a State of Natural & Cultural Resources in the CRE Dave Garrett 

11b State of the Natural & Cultural Resources in the CRE: Draft 

Annual Report Outline 

Dave Garrett 

12 Draft FY99 Annual M&R Plan (10/4/97) Dave Garrett 

13a 

13b 

Outline, Chapter 3 FY99 M&R Program Activities 

FY99 Conceptual Modeling Activities 

Dave Garrett 

13c Elements of FY99 GCMRC Physical Resources M&R Plan Dave Garrett 

14 Outline Information Technology Program Ruth Lambert 

15 Draft of Agenda for January 15-16, 2998 Dave Garrett
PAGE 1 – ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

SEAN P. MITCHELL,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOHN MYRICK, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:15-cv-01449-SB

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION

Michael H. Simon, District Judge.

United States Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman issued Findings and 

Recommendation in this case on January 25, 2016. Dkt. 10. Judge Beckerman recommended that 

the Court dismiss this proceeding, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution. No party has filed 

objections.

Under the Federal Magistrates Act (“Act”), the court may “accept, reject, or modify, in 

whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(1). If a party files objections to a magistrate’s findings and recommendations, “the court 

shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings 

or recommendations to which objection is made.” Id.; Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3).

Case 2:15-cv-01449-SB Document 12 Filed 02/12/16 Page 1 of 2
PAGE 2 – ORDER

If no party objects, the Act does not prescribe any standard of review. See Thomas v. Arn, 

474 U.S. 140, 152 (1985) (“There is no indication that Congress, in enacting [the Act], intended 

to require a district judge to review a magistrate’s report to which no objections are filed.”); 

United States. v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (holding that the 

court must review de novo magistrate’s findings and recommendations if objection is made, “but 

not otherwise”). 

Although review is not required in the absence of objections, the Act “does not preclude 

further review by the district judge[] sua sponte . . . under a de novo or any other standard.” 

Thomas, 474 U.S. at 154. Indeed, the Advisory Committee Notes to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) 

recommend that “[w]hen no timely objection is filed,” the court review the magistrate’s findings 

and recommendations for “clear error on the face of the record.”

No party having made objections, this Court follows the recommendation of the Advisory 

Committee and reviews Judge Beckerman’s Findings and Recommendation for clear error on the 

face of the record. No such error is apparent. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS Judge 

Beckerman’s Findings and Recommendation, Dkt. 10. This case is DISMISSED without 

prejudice for lack of prosecution. See LR 83-12. The Court further finds that any appeal from 

this Order would not be taken in good faith and revokes Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 12th day of February, 2016.

/s/ Michael H. Simon

Michael H. Simon

United States District Judge

Case 2:15-cv-01449-SB Document 12 Filed 02/12/16 Page 2 of 2
.I 668 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

B5ulduLn 

(\ 

Opinion a -55% 

FM: lotsrpro 

%- 

-0s te 

lo* 4 

7-Y 

ti a, I ii ih LA z. 

- 

t1aa &all oxtrad 

on thereof URltrr &e ori- azul all txttn8io.n8 thereof were 

t le.t8 h a l n 1 x t(y 60) da y s* 

to me tht ia rbrlaletrr~ the law, 

It Will %ccoik a very lmportent matter to 4ttmalnt 

h o w to l mlr the ~QluaDtlon aa to the actual and 

mik tmg l lOUL, 88 QltSny 80, 

or three or poaa lr ly l&or0 

eJarwabg*ttht8afaetlar. 
- 

66: 

Joaorablt J.P. Bauldvln, page 2 

Ths priaa taalt prtsuraptloa rtrtrrtd to 02 paragraph 

t OS 8tatlon 28 or said bcnatt Bill psrtalas to the astusl md 

~ttssu’~txptists lnaurredbythslsndsr Inwaloan. Ths 

bill provides that ln a trial for an llljunat1al under tht pro- 

~l&Xh8 Of thi8 lidt thCM SXiSt8 S wiu fSOit jll'tSUW#iOR tbet 

$h@ 8ttUd 8Id StOOSttl'J tQNMt8 Oi 

pollas ($1.00) for taah fifty Dollar8 

say lsan was ens 

or f'raatloaal 

+rt thereof, 1-d. 

A8 lf. irrtorgrct tbt tbovt qUOttd portlm ol 8tn8te 

,all 4). as 88ZW ap&wars la your rtgucst, this prllm taalt.prt21On, the Mttwc Of Whlah is tx~hintd tbott, 8&@it8 only 

'r?h e flcrt note or dsbt owing by a mr8OXl to a lender wbm 

thtrt trt revert1 obllgatioas or note8 exlrtlng bttwoen the 

g"tit8 8t the Wms tiNis. This prims iaala prtsunptlon wall 

got cxttad to the rtnowal or txtuulon of thlir rir8t note or 

::drbt tiOt88 it and sll tXteMfoix8 thereof art rash fog, a period 

0s not .lars than tlxty days. In other word8 lf there lt exlrtLag an outstw note or debt bstusoa ths (Cortover and the 

lender at the tina a loan 18 swls, this prlsp faalt plwsumption 

doss not apply to thir latter losn. Was prlaa raeit prtswaptlon as to the l ataal nnd nw~srnry 0xpn888 iaourred in making 

a loan trtsads only to sush note or debt mads 8t a tlas vbm 

~thtrt art ao aurrsat outstanding obllgatloas bstwesn ths 

*tits, and to the txtcnslcsr ane remial tbsreoi rhsa 8ush 

rots or dsbt and all oxttnslons 8re emh for a psrlod of sixty 

day8 or morh 

We trust the forcgolng r\ilip aks*ors your Loquiry. 

Very truly JOUP 

Robert 0. I;osh
#### Dean Passaro et al., Respondents, v Metropolitan Property and Liability Insurance Company, Appellant.

Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Brown and Eiber, JJ., concur. *[See,*128 Misc 2d 21.]
POWER OF ATTORNEY


     KNOW  ALL  MEN  BY  THESE  PRESENTS,  that  each director whose signature
appears below constitutes and appoints Lowell L. Robertson and Malcolm Jozoff,
and  each  of them severally, his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and
agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and
in  his  or  her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the
Form  10-K  Annual  Report  of  The Dial Corporation for the fiscal year ended
December  28,  1996, and any and all amendments thereto, and to file the same,
with  all  exhibits, thereto, and other documents in connection herewith, with
the  Securities  and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact
and  agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each
and  every  act  and  thing requisite or necessary to be done in and about the
premises,  as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do
in  person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and
agents or either of the, or their or his or her substitutes or substitute, may
lawfully  do  or  cause  to  be  done  by  virtue  hereof.


\s\  Joy  A.  Amundson                                          March 14, 1997
     Joy  A.  Amundson

\s\  Herbert  M.  Baum                                          March 14, 1997
     Herbert  M.  Baum

\s\  Joe  T.  Ford                                              March 14, 1997
     Joe  T.  Ford

\s\  Thomas  L.  Gossage                                        March 14, 1997
     Thomas  L.  Gossage

\s\  Donald  E.  Guinn                                          March 14, 1997
     Donald  E.  Guinn

\s\  Michael  T.  Riordan                                       March 14, 1997
     Michael  T.  Riordan

\s\  Dennis  C.  Stanfill                                       March 14, 1997
     Dennis  C.  Stanfill

\s\  Barbara  S.  Thomas                                        March 14, 1997
     Barbara  S.  Thomas
                                   
                                                                March 14, 1997
     A.  Thomas  Young
<PAGE>   1
                                  Exhibit 11


              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE LOSS




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                             Three Months           Three Months           Nine Months            Nine Months
                                                Ended                  Ended                  Ended                  Ended
                                          September 30, 1998     September 30, 1997     September 30, 1998     September 30, 1997
                                          ------------------     ------------------     ------------------     ------------------

<S>                                       <C>                    <C>                    <C>                    <C>
Net loss-Limited Partners                         $0                     $0                     $0                     $0
                                                 ===                    ===                    ===                    ===
Average Class A and B units outstanding          921                    921                    921                    921
                                                 ===                    ===                    ===                    ===
Net loss per Class A and B unit                   $0                     $0                     $0                     $0
                                                 ===                    ===                    ===                    === 
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET OF REGENT ASSISTED LIVING, INC. AS OF SEPTEMBER 30,
1996, AND THE RELATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS IN THE
PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          4,530,627
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     141,434
<ALLOWANCES>                                       24,750
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                4,723,927
<PP&E>                                         12,780,801
<DEPRECIATION>                                    162,641
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 18,739,706
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           1,553,897
<BONDS>                                         5,974,387
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          10,758,703
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                        (8,345)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   18,739,706
<SALES>                                         9,715,818
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                9,845,411
<CGS>                                           6,010,159
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   9,607,148
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                388,037
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   140,856
<INCOME-TAX>                                       50,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                90,156
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                       90,156
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .02
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 10.88**

**Second Amendment to PromissoryNote**

 

**THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE** dated this 15th  day of December, 2005, is by and among ObsidianLeasing Company, Inc., a Mississippi corporation (“Borrower”) and FairHoldings, Inc. (“Fair”), an Ohio corporation.  The parties agree as follows:

** **

**Recitals**

 

**WHEREAS**, Borrower and Fair entered into that certainPromissory Note dated January 3, 2003, in the principal amount of $927,500.00,which was subsequently amended on August 31, 2005, by the AmendedPromissory Note (the original Promissory Note and all amendments thereto beingreferred to herein as the “Note’); and

** **

**WHEREAS,** Fair has agreed to amend the Note in order to changethe date of maturity of the Note;

** **

**NOW THEREFORE**, in consideration of the premises, and the mutualpromises herein contained, the parties agree that the Note shall be, and herebyis, amended as provided herein and the parties further agree as follows:

** **

**The Maturity Date of the Note is hereby changed to January 3,2009.**

 

**All other terms and conditions contained in the Note, the SecurityAgreement and Mortgage or other related documents shall remain the same andshall continue in full force and effect that are not specifically amendedherein and shall continue during the term of the Note without change, except toreflect the increase in the amount of the Note and to provide securitytherefore for the entire amount that may become due under the Note.**

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, Borrower, and Fair have caused this Second Amendmentto Promissory Note to be executed as of the day first written above.

 

 
| **Fair Holdings, Inc.**   | ** ** | **Obsidian Leasing Company, Inc.** |
|--------------------------------|------------|-----------------------------------------|
| ** **                     | ** ** | ** **                              |
| ** **                     | ** ** | ** **                              |
| **/s/ Timothy  S. Durham**     | ** ** | ** **                              | **/s/ Jeffrey  Osler** | ** ** |
| **By: Timothy S. Durham, CEO** | ** ** | **By: Jeffrey Osler, President**        |
|                                |            |                                         |  |  |

 

1

----
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration # 17123 and # 17124; Pennsylvania Disaster Number PA-00112]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of Pennsylvania dated 08/31/2021. *Incident:*
                         Flash Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         08/18/2021.
 DATES: Issued on 08/31/2021. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         11/01/2021. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         05/31/2022.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:* Tioga. *Contiguous Counties:* Pennsylvania: Bradford, Lycoming, Potter. New York: Chemung, Steuben. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
3.125Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.563Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere
5.710Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.855Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.000Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.000*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.855Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 17123 6 and for economic injury is 17124 0. The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are Pennsylvania, New York. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Isabella Guzman, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2021-19240 Filed 9-3-21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19D0164. JIMMY HILL v. THE STATE.

On August 22, 2018, the trial court entered an order revoking Jimmy Hill’s

probation. Hill filed this application for discretionary appeal on October 25, 2018. 

We, however, lack jurisdiction.

An application for discretionary appeal must be filed within 30 days of the

entry of the order or judgment to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). The

requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept an

application for appeal not made in compliance therewith. See Boyle v. State, 190 Ga.

App. 734, 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989). Hill filed his application 64 days after entry of

the order he seeks to appeal. His application is thus untimely, and it is hereby

DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

November 15, 2018

11/15/2018