alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of

CHARLES ARANGIO

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT
FROM ADMINISTRATIVE SUSPENSION :

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 164 DB 201 9 (No. 95 RST 2019)

Attorney Registration No. 31830

( Northampton County )

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 25 th day of November

, 201 9 , the Report and Recommendation of

Disciplinary Board Member dated November 13 , 2019 , is approved and it is ORDERED

that Charles Arangio

, who has been on Administrative Suspension

, has never been

suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that h e has the moral qualifications,

competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth,

shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this

Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing

of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Daryl Brady, :

Petitioner :

:

v. : No. 482 M.D. 2019

:

Chief Hearing Examiner Zachary J. :

Moslak, Superintendent Barry Smith, :

Deputy D.J. Close, Major J. Barrows, :

Lt. Buterbaugh, Sgt. J. Murarik, :

Hearing Examiner S. Wiggins, :

and C.J. McKeown, :

Respondents :

PER CURIAM O R D E R

NOW, August 28, 2020, upon consideration of Petitioner’s

application for reconsideration, and Respondents’ answer in response thereto, 

the application is denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs

          - [212A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900253G]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice publishes the approval of Sixth Amendment to the Tribal-State Compact (Amendment) for Class III Gaming between the Puyallup Tribe of Indians (Tribe) and the State of Washington (State).

# DATES:

The amendment takes effect on September 1, 2021.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ms. Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of Indian Gaming, Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary—Policy and Economic Development, Washington, DC 20240,                         *paula.hart@bia.gov,*                         (202) 219-4066.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Under section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2701*et seq.,*                     the Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the                     **Federal Register**                     notice of approved Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming activities on Indian lands. As required by 25 CFR 293.4, all compacts and amendments are subject to review and approval by the Secretary. The Amendment authorizes the Tribe to engage in sports wagering at the Tribe's class III gaming facility, updates the Compact to reflect this change in various sections, and incorporates Appendix S, Sports Wagering. The Amendment is approved.                

Bryan Newland,

Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2021-18816 Filed 8-31-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4337-15-P
ORIGINAL 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

DA 23-0188 

BANNER LEE BOYD, 

Petitioner and Appellant, 

v. 

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Respondent and Appellee. 

FILED 

MAR 3 0 2023 

Bowen Gnatenwood Cle:k cf Supreme Court State of Montana 

ORDER 

Banner Lee Boyd moves this Court for appointment of counsel in his recently filed 

appeal. He states that he is incarcerated and that he is financially unable to afford to retain 

private counsel. Boyd believes that he meets the eligibility requirements for the 

appointment of counsel. 

We secured a copy of the register of actions from the Custer County District Court. 

On January 27, 2023, the District Court issued an Order denying Boyd's petition for 

postconviction relief. 

There is no right to the appointment of counsel in a postconviction proceeding for 

relief, although a court may order the assignment of counsel under the circumstances 

outlined in § 46-8-104, MCA. We conclude that Boyd is not entitled to the appointment 

of counsel. He represented himself in the District Court. He has not demonstrated that 

extraordinary circumstances exist, pursuant to § 46-8-104(3), MCA. Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that Boyd's Motion for Appointment of Counsel is DENIED. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to counsel of record and to 

Banner Lee Boyd, along with a copy of this Court's Appellate Handbook for reference to 

the Montana Rules of PTryl .llate Procedure and access to its forms. 

DATED this3 6"day - of March, 2023. 

For the Court, 

hief Justice 

03/30/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0188
**Exhibit 32.1**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**
     In connection with the Annual Report of WilsonsThe Leather Experts Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Joel N. Waller,Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
     1) the Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
     2) the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ JOEL N. WALLER      **Joel N. Waller,** **Chairman and Chief Executive Officer** **(principal executive officer)**
Date: April 29, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information
extracted from the unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements of T. Rowe Price Realty Income Fund IV, America's
Sales-Commission-Free Real Estate Limited Partnership
included in the accompanying Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000826315
<NAME> T. ROWE PRICE REALTY INCOME FUND IV, AMERICA'S
SALES-COMMISS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,769,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  553,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    28,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      23,231,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,050,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,717,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,192,000<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,717,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,465,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,632,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                415,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            415,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   415,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F3>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Not contained in registrant's unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Partners' capital.
<F3>Not applicable.  Net income per limited partnership unit
is $0.53.
</FN>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                         BRISTOL RETAIL SOLUTIONS, INC.

                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
<CAPTION>

                                                                                       INCEPTION
                                                                YEAR ENDED        (APRIL 3, 1996) TO
                                                               DECEMBER 31,          DECEMBER 31,
                                                                   1997                  1996
                                                             ---------------       ---------------
<S>                                                          <C>                   <C>

     BASIC LOSS PER SHARE

          Net loss                                           $   (4,968,607)       $     (106,625)
                                                             ===============       ===============

          Weighted average number of common shares
            outstanding during the period
                                                                  5,198,156             3,319,738
                                                             ===============       ===============

          Basic loss per share                               $         (.96)       $         (.03)
                                                             ===============       ===============

     DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE

          Net loss                                           $   (4,968,607)       $     (106,625)
                                                             ===============       ===============

          Weighted average number of common shares
            outstanding during the period                         5,198,156             3,319,738
                                                             ===============       ===============

          Effect of stock options and warrants
            treated as common stock equivalents
            under the treasury stock method                              --                    --
                                                             ---------------       ---------------

               Total shares                                       5,198,156             3,319,738
                                                             ===============       ===============

          Diluted loss per share                             $         (.96)       $         (.03)
                                                             ===============       ===============

</TABLE>
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-23-00134-CV

__________________

ALABASTER, INC. AND JOHN SHEFFIELD, Appellants

V.

BRENT W. COON AND BRENT W. COON, PC

D/B/A BRENT COON & ASSOCIATES, Appellees

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 172nd District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. E199958

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On June 20, 2024, we abated this appeal and remanded the case to the trial 

court to give the trial court the opportunity to issue such further orders or judgments 

necessary to clarify its April 6, 2023 Order or to create a final, appealable order in 

this cause. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 206 (Tex. 2001). The 

Court order further stated: “Unless a final, appealable order or judgment is included 

in a supplemental clerk’s record and filed with the clerk of this court on or before 
2

July 22, 2024, the appeal will be reinstated and dismissed for want of jurisdiction.”

To date, we have not received a supplemental clerk’s record. No party requested 

additional time to obtain a final judgment or severance order.

The appeal is hereby reinstated. Generally, an appeal may be taken only from 

final judgments and interlocutory orders specifically made appealable by statute. See 

id. at 195. To be final, a judgment must dispose of all issues and parties in a case. 

N.E. Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Aldridge, 400 S.W.2d 893, 895 (Tex. 1966). As we 

explained in our Order of June 20, 2024, the trial court’s Order of April 6, 2023, 

which granted Coon’s motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ claims against the defendants, 

failed to dispose of the defendants’ counterclaims for attorney’s fees and sanctions. 

The appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a); 43.2(f).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on June 24, 2024

Opinion Delivered August 8, 2024

Before Golemon, C.J., Johnson and Chambers, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET OF REGENT ASSISTED LIVING, INC. AS OF MARCH 31, 1997,
AND THE RELATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS IN THE PERIOD
ENDED MARCH 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           6,481,215
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      425,355
<ALLOWANCES>                                        27,000
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,976,757
<PP&E>                                          23,795,178
<DEPRECIATION>                                     290,505
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,850,824
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,189,254
<BONDS>                                         10,497,973
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                      9,349,841
<COMMON>                                        10,808,703
<OTHER-SE>                                       (417,016)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,850,824
<SALES>                                          3,336,347
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,380,269
<CGS>                                            2,136,277
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,623,466
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 101,228
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (190,383)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (24,500)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (165,883)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (165,883)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.07)
        

</TABLE>
#### Board of Managers of National Plaza Condominium I, Respondent, v Astoria Plaza, LLC, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

[946 NYS2d 873]

In an action to foreclose liens upon condominium units for nonpayment of common charges, the defendant Astoria Plaza, LLC, appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golia, J.), entered January 3, 2011, which, upon a decision of the same court entered October 18, 2010, made after a nonjury trial, is in favor of the plaintiff and against it in the principal sum of $120,943.96.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the facts, by reducing the amount awarded to the plaintiff from the principal sum of $120,943.96 to the principal sum of $110,143.96; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for entry of an appropriate amended judgment.

Contrary to the appellant’s contention, its allegations concerning the circumstances surrounding the election of the board of managers of the subject condominium do not constitute a defense to its obligation under the condominium’s bylaws to pay common charges *(see Board of Mgrs. of Madison Med. Bldg. Condominium v Rama,*249 AD2d 140 [1998]; *Caruso v Board of Managers of Murray Hill Terrace Condominium,*146 Misc 2d 405, 408 [1990]; Real Property Law § 339-ii).

Under the particular circumstances of this case, the plaintiffs failure to bill the appellant for common charges did not constitute a waiver of the plaintiffs rights to collect those charges *(cf. Springside Land Co., LLC v Board of Mgrs. of Springside Condominium I,*56 AD3d 654, 658-659 [2008]).

The trial court erred in calculating the amount of common charges owed the plaintiff to the extent of failing to credit the appellant for payments made in the amount of $10,800. Thus, we reduce the damages award accordingly.

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Angiolillo, J.P., Florio, Belen and Chambers, JJ., concur.
# L_2009041EN.01001601.xml

| 12.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 41/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 41/16

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 10 February 2009

appointing a German member and a German alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

(2009/119/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 263 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the German Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 24 January 2006, the Council adopted Decision 2006/116/EC appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2006 to 25 January 2010 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 24 January 2006, the Council adopted Decision 2006/116/EC appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2006 to 25 January 2010 (1).

| (2) | A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the expiry of the mandate of Mr Markus SÖDER. An alternate member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the expiry of the mandate of Mr Günther BECKSTEIN, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the expiry of the mandate of Mr Markus SÖDER. An alternate member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the expiry of the mandate of Mr Günther BECKSTEIN,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following are hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2010:

| (a) | as member:






  — | Ms Emilia MÜLLER, Staatsministerin für Bundes- und Europaangelegenheiten in der Bayerischen Staatskanzlei; |
| --- | --- | --- |

(a)

as member:

—

Ms Emilia MÜLLER, Staatsministerin für Bundes- und Europaangelegenheiten in der Bayerischen Staatskanzlei;

and

| (b) | as alternate member:






  — | Mr Horst SEEHOFER, Bayerischer Ministerpräsident. |
| --- | --- | --- |

(b)

as alternate member:

—

Mr Horst SEEHOFER, Bayerischer Ministerpräsident.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 10 February 2009.

For the Council

The President

M. KALOUSEK

---

(1)  
  OJ L 56, 25.2.2006, p. 75.

1

---
NO. 12-07-00386-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF § APPEAL FROM THE 321ST

Z.S., I.S., AND L.T., § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

MINOR CHILDREN § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b).

Appellant perfected his appeal on October 12, 2007. On October 16, 2007, this court notified

Appellant that no reporter’s record had been filed and that the reporter had filed a motion for

extension of time to file the record, citing nonpayment of the required preparation fee. Appellant

was further advised that the appeal would be submitted on the clerk’s record alone unless proof of

full payment to the reporter was provided to the court no later than October 27, 2008. Appellant did

not provide proof of payment for the reporter’s record or otherwise respond to the October 16, 2007

notice. Therefore, on November 14, 2008, Appellant was notified that this case would be submitted

on the clerk’s record alone and that his brief was due on or before December 15, 2008. When

Appellant failed to file his brief within the required time, this court notified him on December 18,

2008 that the brief was past due and warned that if no motion for extension of time to file the brief

was received by December 29, 2008, the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution under

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(b). The notice further informed Appellant that the motion

for extension of time must contain a reasonable explanation for his failure to file the brief and a

showing that Appellee had not suffered material injury thereby.

To date, Appellant has neither complied with nor otherwise responded to this court’s
2

December 18, 2008 notice. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).

Opinion delivered January 21, 2009.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)
1 

## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2

- 09

- 120

- CV

SUSA J. BAILEY GLENN APPELLANT

V.

J. ROBERT FORSHEY, APPELLEE

LIQUIDATING TRUSTEE OF

BAILEY PROPERTIES, LTD.

----------

FROM THE 96TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

- ---------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

----------

On August 19, 2010, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed as

required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P.

38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the app eal for want of prosecution unless

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

appellan t or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten

days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.

42.3. We have not received any response.

Because app ellant = s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want

of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.

DELIVERED: September 23 , 2010