alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Wilsons
The Leather Experts Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Peter G. Michielutti,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350,
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |                                                         
| | --------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ PETER G. MICHIELUTTI                                
| |                                                         
| | Peter G. Michielutti,                                   
| | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
    Officer
| | (principal financial and accounting
    officer)        

Date: April 29, 2004
List of Attachments

TWG

November 21, 1996

No. Subject: Author

1 Attendance List

2 Adaptive Management Overview Dr. Kai n. Lee

3 Status of AMWG Charter Steven Lloyd

4 Operating Criteria for Glen Canyon Dam Bruce Moore

5 Letter: Scoping of Potential Impacts of

Temperature Controls at Glen Canyon

Dam

Dave Trueman

6 Key elements of the Biological Opinion Christine Karas

7 GCMRC Organization David Garrett

8 Long Term Monitoring and Research

Strategic Plan

David Garrett
#### Eleanor Goldstein, Respondent, v Jonathon D. Jones et al., Appellants, and Michelle Stuhl et al., Respondents.

Submitted February 5, 2007;

decided April 26, 2007

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. 22
- 0662 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. LLOYD MORTIER BARRUS,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including December 6 , 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 30 2023

10/30/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0662
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 170 (Tuesday, September 7, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50120-50121]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19376]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at

[[Page 50121]]

the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than September 23, 
2021.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Jeffrey Imgarten, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. The Bryce S. Flaming Irrevocable Trust, the Matthew G. Flaming 
Irrevocable Trust, and the Ashley N. Flaming Irrevocable Trust, all of 
Cherokee, Oklahoma, Gerald R. Chelgren, as trustee for each trust, 
Derby, Kansas;
    The Randy Scott Flaming Trust, the Rebecca Salinas Irrevocable 
Trust, and the Jacob Salinas Irrevocable Trust, Brenda Salinas, as 
trustee for each trust, and the Barbara Dean Flaming Trust, Jose 
Salinas, individually, and as trustee all of Cherokee, Oklahoma;
    To join the Flaming Family Group, a group acting in concert, to 
retain voting shares of Alfalfa County Bancshares, Inc., and thereby 
indirectly retain voting shares of ACB Bank, both of Cherokee, 
Oklahoma.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 2, 
2021.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2021-19376 Filed 9-3-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
# L_2009179EN.01006001.xml

| 10.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 179/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 179/60

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 605/2009

of 9 July 2009

fixing the maximum export refund for skimmed milk powder in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 619/2008

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1), and in particular Article 164(2), in conjunction with Article 4, thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 619/2008 of 27 June 2008 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds concerning certain milk products (2) provides for a standing invitation to tender procedure. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 619/2008 of 27 June 2008 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds concerning certain milk products (2) provides for a standing invitation to tender procedure.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 6 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1454/2007 of 10 December 2007 laying down common rules for establishing a tender procedure for fixing export refunds for certain agricultural products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for the tendering period ending on 7 July 2009. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 6 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1454/2007 of 10 December 2007 laying down common rules for establishing a tender procedure for fixing export refunds for certain agricultural products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for the tendering period ending on 7 July 2009.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the standing invitation to tender opened by Regulation (EC) No 619/2008, for the tendering period ending on 7 July 2009, the maximum amount of refund for the product and destinations referred to in Article 1(c) and in Article 2 of that Regulation shall be EUR 25,80/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 10 July 2009.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 July 2009.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 168, 28.6.2008, p. 20.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 325, 11.12.2007, p. 69.

3

---
#### In the Matter of Matthew J. Troy, a Disbarred Attorney, Petitioner.

— Application by Matthew J. Troy, a disbarred attorney and counselor-at-law, for reinstatement to the Bar of *354the State of New York and to have his name restored to the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law.

The matter is referred to the Committee on Character and Fitness for the Second Judicial Department for investigation and report on (1) whether petitioner complied with this court’s order of disbarment and (2) whether he presently possesses the character and fitness requisite for an attorney and counselor-at-law.

The petitioner’s application will be held in abeyance pending the Committee’s report. Mollen, P. J., Lazer, Mangano, Thompson and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
(7 App. Div. 142)

#### KESSLER et al. v. LEVY & LEVIS CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 29, 1896.)

Discoveby—To Enable Plaintiff to Fbame Complaint.

An affidavit which states that defendant, in violation of its duty as plaintiffs’ selling agent, made fraudulent returns as to goods sold, and converted to its own use a certain amount of proceeds, does not disclose sufficient grounds for a discovery by defendant for the purpose of enabling plaintiffs to frame their complaint, as the affidavit contains every allegation necessary for the complaint.

Appeal from special term, New York county.

*272Action by William Kessler and others against the Levy & Levis Company. From an order vacating an order for the examination of defendant's president, plaintiffs appeal. Affirmed.

Argued before VAN BRUNT, P. J., and BARRETT, PATTERSON, and INGRAHAM, JJ.

D. Neumark, for appellants.

C. J. Shearn, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The order for the examination of the president of the defendant was granted upon an affidavit stating that such examination was necessary to enable the plaintiffs to prepare their complaint. That order was vacated for the reason that the papers did not disclose sufficient grounds upon which to require the defendant then to submit to an examination. The action is for conversion of a portion of the proceeds of goods sold by the defendant as the selling agent of the plaintiffs, and the affidavit of Alfred Kessler, one of the plaintiffs, states that the defendant, in violation of its duty, sold goods, made fraudulent returns, and has converted to its own use about $1,500 of the proceeds. The court below was right in stating that the affidavit did not disclose sufficient grounds upon which to require any one connected with the defendant to submit to an examination for the purpose of enabling the plaintiffs to frame a complaint. Every allegation necessary in a complaint for conversion of the $1,500 is contained in Mr. Kessler’s affidavit, and there is no occasion for an examination of the character asked for to enable the plaintiffs to state in the complaint any fact which would be the basis of liability, or even to ascertain the amount of damages to be demanded for the conversion. That the affidavit discloses a state of facts which may render it necessary for the plaintiffs to examine some one of the defendant’s officers as a witness before trial may be conceded, but that was not the ground upon which the order for examination now before us was applied for.

The order appealed from, vacating the order for examination, must be affirmed, with $10 costs.
#### AMERICAN SURETY CO. v. CROW.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 20, 1896.)

Action by the American Surety Company against Moses R. Crow.

No opinion. Motion denied. See 38 N. Y. Supp. 1141.
Exhibit 32.1



Visual Networks, Inc.



Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Visual Networks, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, on the date hereof:



| | (a) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Lawrence S. Barker                                                    
|Lawrence S. Barker President and Chief Executive Officer November 15, 2004



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Visual Networks, Inc. and will be retained by Visual Networks, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ryan G. Brown, Appellant.

[946 NYS2d 254]

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered May 24, 2010, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the motion of Edward C. Bruno for leave to *870withdraw as counsel for the appellant is granted, and he is directed to turn over all papers in his possession to new counsel assigned herein; and it is further,

Ordered that Steven A. Feldman, 626 RXR Plaza, West Tower, 6th Floor, Uniondale, N.Y., 11556, is assigned as counsel to perfect the appeal; and it is further,

Ordered that new counsel shall serve and file a brief on behalf of the appellant within 90 days of the date of this decision and order on motion and the respondent shall serve and file its brief within 30 days after the brief on behalf of the appellant is served and filed. By prior decision and order on motion of this Court dated July 29, 2010, the appellant was granted leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person, with the appeal to be heard on the original papers, including a certified transcript of the proceedings, and on the briefs of the parties, who were directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other.

The brief submitted by the appellant’s counsel pursuant to *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), is deficient as it fails to adequately demonstrate that assigned counsel has sufficiently analyzed potential appellate issues and fails to highlight facts in the record that could have arguably supported the appeal *(see Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.],*89 AD3d 252, 256 [2011]; *People v Barger,*72 AD3d 696, 697 [2010]). Since the brief does not demonstrate that assigned counsel acted “as an active advocate on behalf of his . . . client” *(Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.],*89 AD3d at 256 [internal quotation marks omitted]), we must assign new counsel to represent the appellant *(see People v Sanders,*91 AD3d 798 [2012]; *People v Foster,*90 AD3d 1070 [2011]). Skelos, J.P., Florio, Roman and Miller, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2129 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.2129

                       One Hundred Fifth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
the twenty-seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  eight

                                 An Act

 
To eliminate restrictions on the acquisition of certain land contiguous 
                   to Hawaii Volcanoes National Park.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Hawaii Volcanoes National Park 
Adjustment Act of 1998''.

SEC. 2. HAWAII VOLCANOES NATIONAL PARK.

    The first section of the Act of June 20, 1938 (52 Stat. 781, 
chapter 530; 16 U.S.C. 391b), is amended by inserting before the period 
at the end the following: ``, except for the land depicted on the map 
entitled `NPS-PAC 1997HW', which may be purchased with donated or 
appropriated funds''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Glen Canyon Dam Technical Work Group Meeting 

September 27, 2004 

Attendance List

Conducting: Norm Henderson, Chairman 

Committee Members Present: 

Mary Barger, WAPA 

Marklyn Chee, Navajo Nation 

Kerry Christensen, Hualapai Tribe 

Jonathan Damp, Pueblo of Zuni 

William Davis, CREDA 

Lloyd Greiner, UAMPS 

Rick Johnson, Grand Canyon Trust 

Matt Kaplinski, GCRG 

Chris Kincaid, NPS/GLCA 

Robert King, UDWR 

Dennis Kubly, USBR 

Glen Knowles, USFWS 

Phillip S. Lehr, Colo. River Comm./NV 

Ken McMullen, NPS/GCNP 

Don Ostler, UCRC 

Bill Persons, AGFD 

Mark Steffen, Federation of Fly Fishers 

Larry Stevens, Grand Canyon Wildlands Council 

Bill Werner, ADWR 

Michael Yeatts, The Hopi Tribe

Committee Members Absent: 

Illa Bullets, So. Paiute Consortium 

Christopher Harris, CRB/CA 

Amy Heuslein, BIA 

John Shields, WY State Engineers Office 

D. Randolph Seaholm, CWCB 

John Whipple, NM Interstate Stream Comm.

Alternates Present: For: 

Don Ostler John Shields, WY State Engineers Office 

Don Ostler John Whipple, NM Interstate Stream Comm. 

Interested Persons: 

Mike Berry, USBR 

Kurt Dongoske, CREDA 

Helen Fairley, USGS/GCMRC 

Tom Gushue, USGS/GCMRC 

Mike Kearsley 

Josh Korman, Ecometric 

Mike Liszewski, USGS/GCMRC 

Ted Melis, USGS/GCMRC 

Paul Li, IEDA 

Anthony Miller, Colo. River Comm./NV 

Barbara Ralston, USGS/GCMRC 

Barbara Steffen, Federation of Fly Fishers 

Linda Whetton, USBR 

Barbara Wilson, NPS/GLCA 

Scott Wright, USGS/GCMRC 
Glen Canyon Dam Technical Work Group Meeting 

September 28, 2004 

Attendance List

Conducting: Norm Henderson, Chairman 

Committee Members Present: 

Mary Barger, WAPA 

Marklyn Chee, Navajo Nation 

Kerry Christensen, Hualapai Tribe 

Jonathan Damp, Pueblo of Zuni 

William Davis, CREDA 

Lloyd Greiner, UAMPS 

Rick Johnson, Grand Canyon Trust 

Matt Kaplinski, GCRG 

Chris Kincaid, NPS/GLCA 

Robert King, UDWR 

Dennis Kubly, USBR 

Glen Knowles, USFWS 

Phillip S. Lehr, Colo. River Comm./NV 

Ken McMullen, NPS/GCNP 

Don Ostler, UCRC 

Bill Persons, AGFD 

Mark Steffen, Federation of Fly Fishers 

Bill Werner, ADWR 

Michael Yeatts, The Hopi Tribe

Committee Members Absent: 

Illa Bullets, So. Paiute Consortium 

Christopher Harris, CRB/CA 

Amy Heuslein, BIA 

John Shields, WY State Engineers Office 

Larry Stevens, Grand Canyon Wildlands Council 

D. Randolph Seaholm, CWCB 

John Whipple, NM Interstate Stream Comm.

Alternates Present: For: 

Kelly Burke Larry Stevens, Grand Canyon Wildlands Council 

Don Ostler John Shields, WY State Engineers Office 

Don Ostler John Whipple, NM Interstate Stream Comm. 

Interested Persons: 

Mike Berry, USBR 

Kurt Dongoske, CREDA 

Helen Fairley, USGS/GCMRC 

Josh Korman, Ecometric 

Mike Liszewski, USGS/GCMRC 

Ted Melis, USGS/GCMRC 

Paul Li, IEDA 

Anthony Miller, Colo. River Comm./NV 

Randall Peterson, USBR 

Linda Whetton, USBR 

Barbara Wilson, NPS/GLCA
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of LCC International, Inc.
(the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:  (a)
    
    the Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2003, filed on the date hereof with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to LCC International, Inc. and will be retained by LCC
International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request. /s/ C. Thomas Faulders, IIIC. Thomas Faulders, IIIChief Executive OfficerMarch 26, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 162 (Wednesday, August 25, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 47526]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-18316]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: August 25, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
August 10, 2021, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 719 to Competitive Product List. 
Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2021-125, CP2021-
129.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2021-18316 Filed 8-24-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P