alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2009206EN.01001101.xml

| 8.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 206/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 206/11

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 725/2009

of 7 August 2009

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Pan de Cruz de Ciudad Real (PGI))

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Pan de Cruz de Ciudad Real’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Pan de Cruz de Ciudad Real’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, this name should be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, this name should be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 August 2009.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 324, 19.12.2008, p. 26.

2

---

ANNEX

Foodstuffs listed in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 510/2006:

Class 2.4. —   Bread, pastry, cakes, confectionery, biscuits and other baker’s wares

SPAIN

Pan de Cruz de Ciudad Real (PGI)

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial data extracted from the
     consolidated balance sheet and the consolidated statement of operations
     and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such schedules
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Mar-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    Mar-31-1999
<CASH>                          500
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   648,140
<ALLOWANCES>                    137,068
<INVENTORY>                     270,879
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,276,209
<PP&E>                          503,434
<DEPRECIATION>                  444,340
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  2,102,170
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           3,286,921
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     2,426,000
<COMMON>                        4,196,933
<OTHER-SE>                      (8,236,714)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    2,102,170
<SALES>                         4,943,837
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                4,943,837
<CGS>                           3,361,253
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   4,165,874
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                (38,387)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              154,317
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (2,698,220)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (2,698,220)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (2,698,220)
<EPS-BASIC>                   (1.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (1.37)



</TABLE>
H. R. 1762 

One Hundred Fourteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and sixteen 

An Act 

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs community-based outpatient clinic 

in The Dalles, Oregon, as the ‘‘Loren R. Kaufman VA Clinic’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS COMMUNITY-BASED OUTPATIENT CLINIC, THE DALLES, 

OREGON. 

The Department of Veterans Affairs community-based outpatient clinic located at 704 Veterans Drive, The Dalles, Oregon, 

shall after the date of the enactment of this Act be known and 

designated as the ‘‘Loren R. Kaufman VA Clinic’’. Any reference 

to such community-based outpatient clinic in any law, regulation, 

map, document, record, or other paper of the United States shall 

be considered to be a reference to the Loren R. Kaufman VA 

Clinic. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF FIRST INDUSTRIAL SECURITIES, L.P. FOR THE NINE MONTHS
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
(B) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             951
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      185
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (100)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,036
<PP&E>                                          79,924
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,703)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  76,917
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              599
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      75,756
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    76,917
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,293
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  (2,435)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,413)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,445
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,445
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,445
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2186

To terminate all United States assistance to the National Endowment for

Democracy, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 17, 1998

Mr. DORGAN (for himself and Mr. BUMPERS) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

A BILL

To terminate all United States assistance to the National

Endowment for Democracy, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF ASSISTANCE TO THE NA4 TIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY.

5 (a) REPEAL OF NED ACT.—Except as provided in

6 subsection (d), the National Endowment for Democracy

7 Act (22 U.S.C. 4411 et seq.) is hereby repealed.

8 (b) PROHIBITION ON ASSISTANCE TO NED.—Funds

9 may not be expended by any department, agency, or in-
2

•S 2186 IS

1 strumentality of the United States for grants or any other

2 assistance for the National Endowment for Democracy.

3 (c) FINAL AUDIT BY GAO.—The Comptroller Gen4 eral of the United States shall conduct an audit with re5 spect to any funds, not previously audited by the Comp6 troller General, granted by the United States Government

7 to the National Endowment for Democracy and shall sub8 mit a report of that audit to the Congress. The audit shall

9 be conducted in accordance with, and under the conditions

10 set forth in, section 504 of the National Endowment for

11 Democracy Act (22 U.S.C. 4413), as in effect on the day

12 before the date of enactment of this Act.

13 (d) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION.—Notwithstanding

14 subsection (a), section 506 of the National Endowment

15 for Democracy Act (22 U.S.C. 4415) shall continue to

16 apply with respect to any funds received by the National

17 Endowment for Democracy from the United States Gov18 ernment on or before the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INTERIM
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q COMMUNICATIONS & POWER
INDUSTRIES HOLDING CORPORATION FOR THE QUARTER ENDED APRIL 4, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001000654
<NAME> COMMUNICATIONS & POWER INDUSTRIES HOLDING CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-03-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-04-1997
<CASH>                                           1,386
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     51,516
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               107,329
<PP&E>                                          82,358
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 228,754
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           75,092
<BONDS>                                        132,750
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           16,151
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                     (6,830)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   228,754
<SALES>                                        119,191
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               119,191
<CGS>                                           88,562
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   88,562
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,724
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,492
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,770
<INCOME-TAX>                                       195
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,575
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,575
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PETER STROJNIK, Sr., 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

PASADENA ROBLES ACQUISITION, 

LLC, DBA Hilton Pasadena, 

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 19-56037 

D.C. No. 2:19-cv-02067-AB-PJW 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Andre Birotte, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 7, 2020**

Before: TASHIMA, BYBEE, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Peter Strojnik, Sr. appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment 

dismissing his action alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act 

(“ADA”) and state law. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review 

de novo a district court’s dismissal for lack of standing. D’Lil v. Best W. Encina 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 15 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 19-56037 

Lodge & Suites, 538 F.3d 1031, 1035 (9th Cir. 2008). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Strojnik’s ADA claim for lack of 

standing because Strojnik failed to demonstrate an intent to return to defendant’s 

hotel or that he was deterred from visiting defendant’s hotel. See Chapman v. Pier 

1 Imports (U.S.) Inc., 631 F.3d 939, 950 (9th Cir. 2011) (an ADA plaintiff may 

establish injury for standing purposes by showing an “inten[t] to return to a 

noncompliant accommodation” or that the noncompliant accommodation deterred 

the plaintiff from visiting and the plaintiff “plans to visit [the] noncompliant 

accommodation in the future”); see also Civil Rights Educ. & Enf’t Ctr. v. Hosp. 

Props. Trust, 867 F.3d 1093, 1100 (9th Cir. 2017) (district courts make “case-bycase determinations about whether a particular plaintiff’s injury is imminent” 

(citation omitted)).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Strojnik leave to 

amend because amendment would have been futile. See Gordon v. City of 

Oakland, 627 F.3d 1092, 1094 (9th Cir. 2010) (setting forth standard of review and 

explaining that leave to amend may be denied if amendment would be futile).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued 

in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on 

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 31, 2018

No. 04

- 17

- 00572

- CV

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO BY AND THROUGH CITY PUBLIC SERVICE BOARD OF

SAN ANTONIO D/B/A CPS En ergy ,

Appellant s

v.

Chris SMITH,

Appellee s

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015

- CI

- 08496

The Honorable Renée Yanta, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file a reply brief is GRANTED. Appellant’s

reply bri ef is due on February 20, 2018.

I t is so ORDERED on this 31st day of January, 2018

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

__________________ _________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MARCUS ANTHONY MARTINEZ,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-12-00059-CR

Appeal from the

Criminal District Court Number Three

of Tarrant County, Texas

(TC#1212244D)

O P I N I O N

Appellant was charged by indictment for committing the offense of engaging in sexual 

contact with MM, a child under seventeen years of age (Count I) and indecency with MM, a child

under age seventeen, by exposure (Count II). After pleading not guilty, a jury returned a verdict 

finding Appellant guilty of indecency with a child by contact and indecency with a child by 

exposure in cause number 1212244D. After entering judgment on the jury’s verdict, the trial 

court sentenced Appellant to six years’ confinement on each count, to be served concurrently. 

Appellant complains on appeal that the trial court erred in its evidentiary rulings. We affirm.

DISCUSSION

Appellant raises two issues on appeal. In Issue One, Appellant expressly asserts that 

“[t]he State’s presentation of evidence left a false impression that the complainant, [IM], had no 

prior sexual history.” In Issue Two, Appellant asserts the trial court erred when it prohibited him 
2

from inquiring into IM’s sexual history as a possible explanation for IM’s claims.

We have examined the portions of the record to which Appellant has directed us in support 

of his issues on appeal as well as the entire record on appeal. MM is the child complainant in 

cause number 1212244D and this appeal. IM is the child complainant in cause number 1212239D 

and is not the complainant in this appeal.

1

Neither issue Appellant presents in the appeal before us, and none of the record to which 

Appellant directs his complaints, relates to the complaining witness MM or to any testimony or 

evidence offered, admitted, or denied regarding MM. Rather, we observe that Appellant’s issues 

and complaints are solely and expressly directed to evidentiary matters relating to IM. IM is not

the complainant identified in the charges set out in the indictment by which Appellant was 

convicted in cause number 1212244D and from which he appeals. Because Appellant presents 

nothing for our review, we affirm the trial court’s judgment. See Valadez v. Avitia, 238 S.W.3d 

843, 845 (Tex. App. — El Paso 2007, no pet.) (where appellant failed to raise an issue for review, 

court affirmed trial court judgment as it had no right to re-draft and articulate what it believed 

appellant may have intended to raise as error on appeal).

CONCLUSION

The trial court’s judgment is affirmed.

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice

April 9, 2014

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)

 

1 Appellant was prosecuted in cause numbers 1212239D and 1212244D, which were tried together.
IN THE UNITED STA TES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

EUGENE DIVISION 

ANTONIO NERI DUE, ) 

) 

) 

Plaintiff, ) 

) 

v. ) 

) 

CAROLYN W. COL VIN, Acting Commissioner of) 

Social Security, ) 

) 

Defendant. 

6: 15-CV-00049-JO 

JUDGMENT 

Based on the record, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the decision of the 

Commissioner is affomed and this case is dismissed. 

Dated this _J_'t_ day of April, 2016. 

~.JONES United States District Judge 

-JUDGMENT 

Case 6:15-cv-00049-JO Document 26 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      12,341,242
<SECURITIES>                                12,089,617
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,742,824
<ALLOWANCES>                                   422,138
<INVENTORY>                                  4,632,968
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            27,076,010
<PP&E>                                       1,901,097
<DEPRECIATION>                                 681,664
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              45,535,306
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,431,893
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,689
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,161,724
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                45,535,306
<SALES>                                     38,754,127
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            44,725,040
<CGS>                                       29,819,071
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,931,514
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (82,785)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (704,992)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (17,830,931)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (273,156)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (17,557,775)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (17,557,775)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 169 (Friday, September 3, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 49580]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19290]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of 
the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the 
Securities and Exchange Commission Investor Advisory Committee will 
hold a public meeting on Thursday, September 9, 2021. The meeting will 
begin at 10 a.m. (ET) and will be open to the public.

PLACE: The meeting will be conducted by remote means and/or at the 
Commission's headquarters, 100 F St NE, Washington, DC 20549. Members 
of the public may watch the webcast of the meeting on the Commission's 
website at www.sec.gov.

STATUS: This Sunshine Act notice is being issued because a majority of 
the Commission may attend the meeting. On August 27, 2021, the 
Commission published notice of the Committee meeting (Release Nos. 33-
10968, 34-92783), indicating that the meeting is open to the public and 
inviting the public to submit written comments to the Committee.

MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED:  The agenda for the meeting includes: Welcome 
remarks; approval of previous meeting minutes; a panel discussion 
entitled ``Reimagining Investor Protection in a Digital World: The 
Behavioral Design of Online Trading Platforms''; a panel discussion 
regarding competition and regulatory reform at the PCAOB; a discussion 
of a recommendation regarding 10b5-1 plans; a discussion of a 
recommendation regarding SPACs; subcommittee reports; and a non-public 
administrative session.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed; 
please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary 
at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: September 1, 2021.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-19290 Filed 9-1-21; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P