Interim Decision #1686 

MATTER OF Fiuson 

Application for Classification as Refugee 

A-12108899 

Decided by Regional Comaniesioner January 19, 1967 

Since applicant—a native and citizen of Yugoslavia, who entered the Unitedt 

States as a noniramigrant student in possession of a Yugoslav passport and an 

exit and reentry visa; who subsequently applied for and was granted extensions thereof by the 'Yugoslav authorities; and who testified she had never 

been subject to persecution and that not until after 2 years in this country did 

she decide she did not wish to return to Yugoslavia—has not established that 

she fled from Yugoslavia because of persecution or fear of persecution on 

account of race, religion or political opinion, she is statutorily ineligible forrefugee classification under the proviso to section 203 (a) (7), immigration 

and Nationality Act, es amended. 

On BEHALF OF AP/smarm : Edward S. Yambusic, Esquire 

3410 Lorring Drive, S.R, Apt. 201 

Washington, D.C. 20028 

This matter is before the Regional Commissioner for review oncertification by the District Director of his decision denying the application for refugee classification under section 203(a) (7) of the 

Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended. 

The applicant is a citizen of Yugoslavia, born October 17, 1944 in 

Krizevci, Yugoslavia. She entered the United States January 23, 1961 

as a nonimmigrant student and was thereafter authorized to remain in 

that status until March 27, 1965. She graduated from the Julia Richmond High School in June 1964. She has since remained in the United' 

States. 

Deportation proceedings i were instituted October 15, 1964 by the 

Service of an order to show cause. The deportation hearing was commenced October 22, 1964 and completed initially on November 16, 

1964. The hearing was reopened and again completed July 1, 1965. 

The Special Inquiry Officer then deferred his decision. In connection 

with the pending deportation proceedings, the Special Inquiry Officer 

on January 20, 1966 addressed a letter to counsel calling the latter's 

attention to the provisions of Section 203 (a) (7) of the• Immigration 

40 
Interim Decision *1686 

and Nationality Act, as amended by PL 89-236 of October 3, 1965, 

and to an amendment of the relating regulations (8 CFR 245.1). Counsel was informed that if the application for refugee status were made 

to the District Director and approved a motion could then be submitted for a further reopening of the deportation hearing to apply 

for adjustment of status to that of a permanent resident under section 

245 of the Act. The application for refugee classification on Form 

I-590A was received March 6, 1966 and referred to the District 

Director for his consideration. 

Section 245.4, Title 8, Code of Federal Regulations, reads in part: 

The provisions of section 245 of the Act and this Part shall govern the adjustment of status provided for in the proviso to section 203 (a) (7) of the Act .. 

alien who claims he is entitled to a preference status pursuant to the proviso to 

section 203(a) (7) of the Act shell execute and attach to his application for 

adjustment of status Porm I-590A, Application for Classification as a Refugee. 

under the proviso to section 203(a) (7), Immigration and Nationality Act. The. 

determination as to whether an alien is entitled to the claiined preference shall 

be made by the district director ; no appeal shall lie from his determination. 

This application on Form I-590A for classification as a refugee is 

not physically accompanying an application on Form 1 -485 for status 

as a permanent resident. The later application, however, may be made 

only to the Special Inquiry Officer in the deportation proceeding when, 

as here, an order to show cause has been served (8 CPR 245.2). The 

Special Inquiry Officer suggested the submission of the present application and indicated that upon its approval, he would entertain 

an application on Form I-185. Under these circumstances, we find the 

application for preference classification as a refugee is properly before 

this Service. 

Counsel has submitted an extensive brief for our consideration. He 

alleges the applicant underwent physical persecution "even at the 

age of a year and half" and as a small child because of the conviction 

and imprisonment in Yugoslavia of her father for crimes against the 

state, and the resultant hardships to his wife and the applicant.. Counsel further states that during her school years she was subjected to 

ridicule arising from her father's conviction as well as the family's 

religion. The brief deals for the most part, however, with the general 

situation of many years duration in Yugoslavia upon which. the applicant's present unwillingness to return to that country is based. 

Section 203(a) (7) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as 

amended, provides, so far as pertinent here: 

Conditional entries shall next be made available by the Attorney General, 

pursuant to such regulations as he may prescribe and in a number not to exceed 

6 per centum of the number specified in section 201(a) (ii), to aliens who satisfy 

an Immigration and Naturalization Service officer at an examination in any 

41 
Interim Decision #1686 

non-Communist or non-Communist-dominated country, (e.) that (I) because of 

persecution or fear of persecution on account of race, religion, or political opinion they have lied (I) from any Communist or Communist-dominated country or 

area, . . . and (i1) are unable or unwilling to return to such country or area 

on account of race, religion, or political opinion, . PROVIDED, That immigrant 

visas in a number not exceeding one-half the number specified in this paragraph 

may be made available, in nee of ennditional entries of a like number, to such 

aliens who have been continuously physically present in the United States for a 

period of at least two years prior to application for adjustment of status. 

The denial of this application by the District Director is based on 

his conclusion that the applicant has failed to establish that upon 

her return to Yugoslavia she would be subject to persecution on account 

of race, religion or political opinions. The ground as stated in his 

decision is not appropriate. The staatory requirement with respect to 

possible return to her homeland is that she satisfy the officer of this 

Service that she is "unable or unwilling to return" on account of race, 

religion, or political opinion. (Underscoring supplied.) The applicant has stated on Form I-590A that she is unwilling to return to 

Yugoslavia because of her political and religious convictions. For the 

reason stated below, we need not make a determination on this issue. 

The use of the conjunction "and" between clause (i) and clause 

(ii) of section 203(a) (7) of the Act makes it clear that the applicant 

must in any event meet the requirement of clause (i) by establishing 

satisfactorily that she has fled from a Communist or Communistdominated country or area "because of persecution or fear of persecution on account of race, religion, or political opinion." 

The applicant testified on November 16, 1964 that she had never 

been subject to persecution, and that the only thing was a threat she 

would be expelled from school if she went to church. The threat was 

not carried out. In her present application she says she entered the 

United States as a student January 23,1961; that while in the United 

States she followed developments in Yugoslavia; that during her 

stay here she learned her parents' living conditions and the political 

situation in Yugoslavia had become more unfavorable; that she then 

decided to stay permanently in the United States; and that on or about 

June 18, 1964 she requested permanent residence in a letter addressed 

to the President. During the interview on this application, she executed 

an affidavit in which she states that she entered the United States 

primarily to study and attend school; that after two years in this country she realized the meaning of freedom and decided then she did not 

wish to return to Yugoslavia; and that now she does not want to return. 

These statements of the applicant are supported by her testimony on 

October 22, 1964 before the Special Inquiry Officer indicating her 

understanding that return passage had been arranged when she came 

42 
Interim Dedsion #1686' 

to the United States. In addition, the applicant was in possession of a 

Yugoslav passport issued on September 28, 1960 with an exit and reentry visa when she arrived in the United States on January 23, 1961. 

Subsequently she applied to the Yugoslav authorities and obtained 

extensions of her Yugoslav passport and visa on March 30, 1962 and 

March 17, 1964. Her actions in obtaining those extensions constitute 

further evidence that she was not fleeing ( as required by section 203 

(a) (7) ) from Yugoslavia when she departed from that country, that 

she in fact departed from Yugoslavia with the intention of returning 

to that country, and that her change of intention in that regard was 

formulated at a considerable time after her departure from Yugoslavia. 

After careful consideration of the entire record, we find that the evidence does not establish that the applicant fled from Yugoslavia because of persecution or fear of persecution on account of race, religion 

or political opinion. Since she does not meet the statutory requirement, 

the application must be denied. 

It is ordered that the application be and the same is hereby denied. 

43