alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices 

# Order

June 3, 2016

153008

TERIDEE LLC, JOHN F. KOETJE TRUST,

and DELIA KOETJE TRUST,

Plaintiffs

- Appellees,

v SC: 153008

COA: 324022

Wexford CC: 2013

- 024803

- CH

HARING CHARTER TOWNSHIP and

CLAM LAKE TOWNSHIP,

Defendants

- Appellants.

_________________________________________/

AMENDMENT TO ORDER

On order of the Court, this Court’s April 6, 2016 order is amended, to correct a

clerical error, and reads as follows:

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 8, 2015

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall

include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether Inverness Mobile Home Community

v Be dford Twp , 263 Mich App 241 (2004), applies to the defendant townships’

Agreement pursuant to the Intergovernmental Conditional Transfer of Property by

Contract Act, 1984 PA 425, MCL 124.21 et seq . (Act 425); (2) if so, whether the

challenged provisions of the Act 425 Agreement were nevertheless authorized by Section

6(c) of Act 425, MCL 124.26(c); and (3) if the challenged provisions are void, whether

the offending provisions of the defendant townships’ Act 425 Agreement were severable.

The Michigan To wnships Association and the Michigan Municipal League are

invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the

determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to

file briefs amicus curiae.

We further ORDER that this case be argued and submitted to the Court together

with the case of Clam Lake Twp v Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs

(Docket No. 151800), at such future session of the Court as both cases are ready for

s ubmission. In light of the joint submission, the time allotted for oral argument shall beI, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 3, 2016

s0330t 2

Clerk limited to fifteen minutes per side in each case. MCR 7.314(B)(1). Motions for

permission to file briefs amicus curiae and briefs amicus curiae regarding these two cases

should be filed in Clam Lake Twp v Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs

(D ocket No. 151800) only and served on the parties in both cases.
(November 17, 1986)

#### Atom Restaurant, Ltd., et al., Appellants, v 441 Wharf Restaurant, Ltd., et al., Defendants, and John Stefan et al., Respondents. (Action No. 1.) John Stefan et al., Respondents, v Atom Restaurant, Ltd., Appellant, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 2.) John Stefan et al., Respondents, v Atom Restaurant, Ltd., et al., Appellants. (Action No. 3.)

Brown, J. P., Rubin, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.
#### Nancy Wadler, Appellant, v Martin Stern, Respondent.

Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.70











Complementary Agreement of Land Mortgage Loan Contract



Party A (Lender): Shijiazhuang Zhongbo Automobile Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Party A")



Party B (Borrower): Northern Altair Nanotechnologies Co., Ltd.(hereinafter referred to as "Party B")



1. Party A and Party B signed two sums of land mortgage loan contracts respectively in September 2015 and March 2016; the total amount of the two loan contract is RMB 59,400,000.00. After friendly negotiation of both parties, the loan interest of Article I under the original contract has changed as: The loan interest of the two sums in 2015 and 2016 is zero; it begins to calculate interest accrual from 2017.



2. The original contract clauses are invariant.



3. This agreement is in quadruplicate with Party A and Party B holding two respectively.



|Party A: Shijiazhuang Zhongbo Automobile Co., Ltd.

Shijiazhuang Zhongbo Automobile Co., Ltd. (Seal) | Party B: Northern Altair Nanotechnologies Co., Ltd.

Northern Altair Nanotechnologies Co., Ltd.
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Legal representative (or authorized representative): Sun Guohua                                      | Legal representative (or authorized representative): Wei Guohua                                
|MM/DD/YYYY                                                                                           | MM/DD/YYYY
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                            9950
<SECURITIES>                                      5429
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2658
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1620
<INVENTORY>                                       2889
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 23370
<PP&E>                                             663
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   24033
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             4594
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                       27682
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     24033
<SALES>                                           5152
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  5152
<CGS>                                             2880
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2882
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (213)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (397)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (397)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (397)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)


</TABLE>
LISSA CASEY, OSB #086541

MICHAEL ARNOLD, OSB #011873

lissa@arnoldlawfirm.com

mike@arnoldlawfirm.com

Arnold Law

401 East 10th Ave. Ste 400

Eugene, OR 97401

Ph: 541-338-9111

Attorneys for Ammon Bundy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

AMMON BUNDY et al,

 Defendants.

Case No.: 3:16-CR-00051

DEFENDANT AMMON BUNDY’S 

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO 

EXTEND DEADLINE FOR 

MOTION TO DISMISS FOR 

LACK OF JURISDICTION

(Expedited Consideration Requested)

(Government does not Oppose)

Defendant AMMON BUNDY respectfully moves this Court for an order 

that moves the Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction from the first round of 

motions to the second round. The reason for this request, more extensively 

outlined in the attached declaration, incorporated herein by reference, is that this 

motion will require an evidentiary hearing. 

In summary, Defendant Ammon Bundy intends to provide evidence to the 

Court to prove lack of jurisdiction over the refuge property due to issues with title 

which are in conflict with the United States Constitution. Given the complexities 

of the evidence involved, it is not a simple legal argument that can be briefed and 

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 453 Filed 04/22/16 Page 1 of 2
expedited for the Court. Evidence must be taken, and witnesses will likely need to 

be called.

DATED this 22nd day of April, 2016.

/s/ Lissa Casey

Michael Arnold, OSB #011873

mike@arnoldlawfirm.com

Lissa Casey, OSB #086541

lissa@arnoldlawfirm.com

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 453 Filed 04/22/16 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 23.01**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-53726, 333-02948, 333-57965, 333-37168, 333-106062 and333-106064 on Form S-8, 333-65555, 333-66943, and 333-122084 on Form S-3, and 333-31618 on Form S-4, of our report dated March 13, 2009, relating to financial statements and financial statement schedule of Caraustar Industries, Inc. andsubsidiaries (the “Company”), (which report on the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule expresses an unqualified opinion and included an explanatory paragraph concerning substantial doubt about theCompany’s ability to continue as a going concern and the Company’s adoption on January 1, 2007 of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes), and the effectiveness ofthe Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008. 

 

***DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP***

 

**Atlanta, Georgia**

**March 13, 2009**
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1776 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1776

    To amend title 31, United States Code, to provide for automatic 
                        continuing resolutions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 14, 2015

 Mr. Grayson (for himself and Mr. Cartwright) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 31, United States Code, to provide for automatic 
                        continuing resolutions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Shut Down the Shutdowns Act'', or 
the ``Don't Interrupt America Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTOMATIC CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS.

    Chapter 13 of title 31, United States Code, is amended by inserting 
after section 1310 the following new section:

``SEC. 1311. CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS.

    ``(a) Should an appropriation for the operation of any program, 
project, or activity within a Federal agency expire prior to the 
passage of a new appropriation measure funding that agency, each 
expired program, project, or activity within that agency shall be 
appropriated a sum equal to the annualized rate of the previous 
appropriation, prorated through the end of--
            ``(1) the fiscal year if such expiration occurs on or prior 
        to September 29 of any given year; or
            ``(2) the following fiscal year if such expiration occurs 
        on September 30 of any given year.
Funds previously made available, and prior authorization, for such 
programs, projects, or activities shall also be extended consistent 
with this subsection.
    ``(b) Any appropriation, or funds made available, or authority 
granted, for a program, project, or activity, pursuant to this section, 
shall be subject to the same terms and conditions as were in place on 
the date prior to any extension made pursuant to this section.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> BD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                        51314200
<RECEIVABLES>                                358259600
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                        388455800
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                           26524500
<PP&E>                                         4789400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               965343400
<SHORT-TERM>                                  81564000
<PAYABLES>                                   355749400
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                          360184500
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                             2986600
<LONG-TERM>                                   27628300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       1259600
<OTHER-SE>                                    81505200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 965343400
<TRADING-REVENUE>                              6803600
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                          12248200
<COMMISSIONS>                                  7135500
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                  4408700
<FEE-REVENUE>                                  1482000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             9827000
<COMPENSATION>                                17083700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (2983500)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   (2983500)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (1861000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)




</TABLE>
# C_2006046EN.01002801.xml

| 24.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/28

---

Publication of decisions by Member States to grant or revoke operating licenses pursuant to Article 13(4) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92 on licensing of air carriers (1)
   (2)

1

2

(2006/C 46/05)

Text with EEA relevance

SPAIN

Change of name of license holder

Category A:   Operating licences without the restriction of Article 5(7)(a) of Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92

| New name of air carrier | Address of air carrier | Permitted to carry | Decision effective since |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| IBERTRANS AÉREA, S. L. — COMPAÑÍA AÉREA DE NAVEGACIÓN ALAIRE, S. L. | Calle Cinco Norte |
| Parcela 1.4.B4 |
| Aeropuerto Madrid-Barajas |
| E-28042 Madrid |

New name of air carrier

Address of air carrier

Permitted to carry

Decision effective since

IBERTRANS AÉREA, S. L. — COMPAÑÍA AÉREA DE NAVEGACIÓN ALAIRE, S. L.

Calle Cinco Norte

Parcela 1.4.B4

Aeropuerto Madrid-Barajas

E-28042 Madrid

passengers, mail, cargo

20.12.2005

---

(1)  OJ L 240, 24.8.1992, p. 1.

1

(2)  Communicated to the European Commission before 31.8.2005.

2

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          12,451
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  178,136
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,837
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               209,978
<PP&E>                                          36,420
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 530,418
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           59,911
<BONDS>                                        216,787
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           328
<OTHER-SE>                                     245,482
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   530,418
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               458,299
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  348,271
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                82,030
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,081
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,694
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,532
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,162
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,162
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.41
        

</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-09-00555-CR

Diane Wilson, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CALDWELL COUNTY, 421ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 2008-231, HONORABLE TODD A. BLOMERTH, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Pursuant to a plea agreement, Diane Wilson pleaded guilty to a charge of burglary of

a building. The court deferred adjudication, and Wilson was placed on community supervision for

ten years. She filed a notice of appeal in which she acknowledged that the punishment assessed does

not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and to which she and her attorney

agreed. Wilson nevertheless asserts her intention to appeal pretrial rulings including the denial of

her motions to dismiss, to suppress a written statement, and to set aside her indictment based on

the lack of a speedy trial. The trial court certified that this “is a plea bargain case, and the defendant

has NO right of appeal.” See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).

Wilson and her attorney both signed the “Admonishments, Plea Agreement, Waiver

of Rights, and Stipulation of Evidence Regarding Plea of Defendant.” The admonishments section

of that agreement provides that, if the punishment assessed does not exceed the punishment
2

recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by Wilson and her attorney, Wilson must obtain

the trial court’s permission to appeal any matter except for those raised by pretrial, written motion.

The waiver of rights section, however, provides that “Defendant waives the right to file a Motion

for New Trial, waives the right to pursue an appeal of the conviction and sentence herein, and

waives all rights contained in the written and oral admonishments given by the Court.” Wilson and

her attorney both signed the agreement immediately below the waiver of rights section.

The rules of appellate procedure provide that “[t]he appeal must be dismissed if a

certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record

under these rules.” Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). No such certification has been made part of the record.

We must dismiss this appeal.

Dismissed.

 

G. Alan Waldrop, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Waldrop and Henson

Dismissed

Filed: October 23, 2009

Do Not Publish
# C_2009231EN.01000101.xml

| 25.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 231/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 231/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5598 — Dragados/POL — AQUA Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 231/01

On 16 September 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5598. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5598. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         451,186
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,969,851
<ALLOWANCES>                                   229,719
<INVENTORY>                                    667,687
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,072,569
<PP&E>                                       7,914,487
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,119,851)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,781,175
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       38,851,367
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,985
<OTHER-SE>                                (18,169,481)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,781,175
<SALES>                                     21,492,439
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            21,492,439
<CGS>                                       28,910,477
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               28,910,477
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               306,067
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             206,245
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,930,350)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,930,350)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,930,350)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.79)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.79)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

EUGENE DIVISION 

WENDY L. MOWDY, ) 

) 

Plaintiff, ) 

) 

v. ) 

) 

CAROLYN W. COL VIN, Acting Commissioner of ) 

Social Security, ) 

) 

Defendant. ) 

6:15-cv-01871-JO 

JUDGMENT 

Based on the record, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the decision of the 

Commissioner is affinned and this case is dismissed. 

Dated this t.[ th day of Januaiy; 2017. 

!-JUDGMENT 

Case 6:15-cv-01871-JO Document 14 Filed 01/04/17 Page 1 of 1