alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<RESTATED>
<CIK>                                            0001016151
<NAME>                                      Amplidyne, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                              1
<CURRENCY>                                              USD
       
<S>                                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                   JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                     DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                           1
<CASH>                                              104,310
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       326,339
<ALLOWANCES>                                        119,000
<INVENTORY>                                         402,696
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1,099,550
<PP&E>                                              456,324
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (145,593)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1,622,564
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             3,340,415
<BONDS>                                           2,006,361
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                285
<OTHER-SE>                                       (1,919,105)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1,622,564
<SALES>                                           2,219,945
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          0
<CGS>                                             2,198,503
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  2,296,620
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  109,772
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (5,419,940)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (5,419,940)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (2.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (2.03)
        


</TABLE>
AMENDED AND RESTATED
                       CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                                       OF
                        PAINEWEBBER/GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME
                            LIMITED PARTNERSHIP II-D


TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE
OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA:

       The  undersigned,  desiring  to amend and restate  its  certificate  of
limited   partnership   pursuant  to  the  Oklahoma  Revised  Uniform  Limited
Partnership  Act, as amended,  54 O.S. Supp.  1988, Sec.  301-365 (the "Act"),
does hereby state:

       1.    The name of the  limited  partnership  is  "PaineWebber/  Geodyne
Energy Income Limited Partnership II-D."

       2.    The  date  of  filing  the   original   certificate   of  limited
partnership is May 13, 1988.

       3. (a) The address of the office of the limited partnership, which is the
same address where the records of the limited partnership are kept, is 320 South
Boston, The Mezzanine, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74103-3708.

             (b)   The name and  address  of the agent for  service of process
are  Geodyne  Properties,  Inc.,  320  South  Boston,  The  Mezzanine,  Tulsa,
Oklahoma 74103--3708.

       4.    The name and  business  address  of the  general  partner  are as
follows:

                   Geodyne Properties, Inc.
                   320 South Boston, The Mezzanine
                   Tulsa, Oklahoma 74103-3708

       5.    The  latest  date  upon  which  the  limited  partnership  is  to
dissolve is December 31, 2001.

       6.    The limited  partnership  hereby elects to become  subject to all
of the provisions of the Act.

DATED March 9, 1989.
                                    Geodyne Properties, Inc.
                                    General Partner of PaineWebber/
                                    Geodyne Energy Income Limited
                                    Partnership II-D

                                    By:   /s/ Michael E. Luttrell
                                          -----------------------------
                                          Michael E. Luttrell
                                          Executive Vice President
1 - ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

DANIEL LOREN JENKINS, No. 2:16-cv-00247-YY

Petitioner, ORDER

v. 

 

JOHN MYRICK, Superintendent Two

Rivers Correctional Institution,

 Respondent.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge You issued a Findings and Recommendation on December 16, 2021, in 

which she recommends that this Court deny Petitioner’s Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas 

Corpus F&R, ECF 104. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) 

and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Case 2:16-cv-00247-YY Document 122 Filed 03/27/22 Page 1 of 2
2 - ORDER

Petitioner filed timely objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and

Recommendation. Pet. Obj., ECF No. 114. When any party objects to any portion of the 

Magistrate Judge’s Findings & Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo

determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge’s report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. 

Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).

The Court has carefully considered Petitioner’s objections and concludes that there is no 

basis to modify the Findings & Recommendation. The Court has also reviewed the pertinent 

portions of the record de novo and finds no error in the Magistrate Judge’s Findings & 

Recommendation. 

CONCLUSION 

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge You’s Findings and Recommendation [104].

Therefore, Petitioner’s Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [27] pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2254 is DENIED. Because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right, a Certificate of Appealability pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) is also 

DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: _______________________.

 ___________________________

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ

United States District Judge

March 27, 2022

Case 2:16-cv-00247-YY Document 122 Filed 03/27/22 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND THE RELATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,129
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   70,958
<ALLOWANCES>                                    12,461
<INVENTORY>                                      3,109
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                72,605
<PP&E>                                          30,372
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,222
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 140,203
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,257
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        44,119
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   140,203
<SALES>                                         92,788
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                92,788
<CGS>                                           43,587
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   85,427
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                28,396<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,634
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (24,669)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,841)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (21,828)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (21,828)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.38)
<FN>
<F1>Other expenses includes pretax accounting charges during the three months
ended December 31, 1997 of $28.4 million which was comprised of a writedown of
goodwill of $23.5 million, restructuring costs of $3.7 million and the writeoff
of deferred costs aggregating $1.2 million related to a terminated acquisition.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA PR 22-0005

IN RE THE MOTION OF MICHAEL THOMAS FREEMAN FORADMISSION TO THE BAR OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

# FILED FEB 0 1 2022 Bovven Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana ORDER

Michael Thomas Freeman has filed a motion for admission to the Bar ofthe State ofMontana pursuant to Rule V ofthe Rules for Admission, Admission on Motion. The Bar Admissions Administrator ofthe StateBar ofMontana has informedthe Courtthat the Commission on Character and Fitness has certified that Freeman has provided the necessary documentation and has satisfied the requirements prerequisite to admission on motion under Rule V. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon payment of any application fees and completion of any other processing requirements as set forth by the Bar Admissions Administrator, Michael Thomas Freeman may be sworn in to the practice of law in the State ofMontana. Arrangements for swearing in may be made by contacting the office of the Clerk ofthe Montana Supreme Court. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis order to Petitioner and to the State Bar ofMontana. DATED thisf

— day ofFebruary, 2022.
ChiefJustice



# 7-e/7--1 02/01/2022

Case Number: PR 22-0005

# irf Justices

2
Exhibit
23.1







Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




The Board
of Directors and Stockholders


The
Ultimate Software Group, Inc.:





We
consent to the incorporation by reference (i) in the registration statements
(No. 333-107527 and No. 333-115894) on Forms S-3 of The Ultimate Software
Group, Inc. (the Company) and (ii) the registration statements (No.
333-55985, No. 333-91332, No. 333-125076, No. 333-142972, and
No. 333-161201) on Forms S-8 of the Company of our reports dated March
5, 2010, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows
for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, and the
related financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, which reports appear in
the December 31, 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K of the
Company.


/s/ KPMG LLP




March 5,
2010


Miami,
Florida


Certified
Public Accountants




68
EXHIBIT 31.1



RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, E. Mac Crawford, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Caremark Rx, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge,
this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;



3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;



4. The
registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: August 9, 2004



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|/s/    E. MAC CRAWFORD                 
|E. Mac Crawford Chief Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

HORACE ARCHER,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 300 EAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of October, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.2

                                   CERTIFICATE

         I, KENNETH J. WARREN, hereby certify that I am the duly elected
Secretary of Royal Precision, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"),
and do further certify that the following resolutions were duly adopted by the
Board of Directors of the Corporation at a meeting duly called and held on July
23, 1998, and that such resolutions have not been amended or rescinded, and are
in full force and effect:

         RESOLVED, that each officer and director who may be required to execute
an annual report on Form 10-KSB or any amendment or supplement thereto (whether
on behalf of the Company or as an officer or director thereof or otherwise) be,
and each of them hereby is, authorized to execute a power of attorney appointing
Christopher A. Johnston and Thomas Schneider and each of them severally, his
true and lawful attorneys and agents to execute in his name, place and stead (in
any such capacity) said Form 10-KSB and all instruments or reports necessary or
in connection therewith, and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, each of said attorneys and agents to have the power to act with or
without the other, to have full power and authority to do and to perform in the
name and on behalf of each of said officers and directors, or both, as the case
may be, every act which is necessary or advisable to be done as fully, and to
all intents and purposes, as any such officer or director might or could do in
person; and further ...

         Dated this 24th day of August, 1998.


                                             /s/ Kenneth J. Warren
                                             Kenneth J. Warren
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

JESUS ACEVEDO

- LANDIN,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 16

- 50437

D.C. No. 3:16

- cr

- 01481

- LAB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 26, 2017 **

Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Jesus Acevedo

- Landin appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty

- plea conviction and 24

- month sentence for attempted reentry

of a removed alien , in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v.

California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Acevedo

- Landin ’s counsel has filed a brief

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

OCT 2 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 50437

stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as

counsel of record. We have provided Acevedo

- Landin the opportunity to file a pro

se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering b rief has been

filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.
#### Ann Paglia, Respondent, v Jugal K. Agrawal et al., Appellants.

*794Special Term improperly vacated the dismissal of the action, restored the case to the Trial Calendar and set a date certain for the parties to submit to examinations before trial. "It is well settled that once an action has been dismissed under CPLR 3404, a motion to open the default and restore the case to the calendar * * * require[s] proof of merit * * * lack of prejudice to the opposing party and * * * excusable neglect” *(see, Fluman v TSS Dept. Stores,*100 AD2d 838).

The plaintiff failed to set forth a reasonable excuse for her 34-month delay in seeking to move to restore the case to the Trial Calendar. Moreover, she "failed to establish the legal merits of this action by an affidavit from a physician competent to attest to the meritorious nature of [her] claim” *(see, Amodeo v Radler,*89 AD2d 594, 595, *affd*59 NY2d 1001). The report allegedly from a physician, who is unidentified, and the plaintiff’s affidavits were insufficient to establish that there is merit to this action concerning the alleged medical malpractice of the defendants *(see, Wind v Cacho,*111 AD2d 808, 809, *appeal dismissed*67 NY2d 871; *Amodeo v Radler, supra,*at p 595).

Accordingly, those branches of the plaintiff’s motion which were to vacate the dismissal and restore the action to the Trial Calendar should have been denied. That branch of the plaintiff’s motion which was to set a date certain for the parties to submit to examinations before trial should have been denied as moot. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of Total Identity Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Matthew P. Dwyer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 By:/s/ Matthew P. DwyerMatthew P. DwyerChief Executive OfficerMay 5, 2004
Discussion about 

LTEMP Tools and Methods

June 26, 2018
Not meeting HBC 

resource goal

Need 

more food

Do 

bug flows

Drift, adult emergence, 

HBC condition

Reality 

match model

More/less 

bug flows

Model(s)

Bug flows used

here as an example
Tool to Assess Problem etc.
Bug model

Bug metrics Humpback 

chub metrics

Method for 

Evaluation etc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                        1
<CASH>                                           177,679
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    339,541
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (15,060)
<INVENTORY>                                      579,713
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,082,012
<PP&E>                                           695,755
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (326,374)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,507,969
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            630,265
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                          47,545
<OTHER-SE>                                       698,395
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,507,969
<SALES>                                        4,567,531
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4,567,531
<CGS>                                          3,483,357
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,201,018
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (120,339)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (237,015)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     335,373
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (572,388)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (572,388)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.01)



</TABLE>