alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      46,901,922
<SECURITIES>                                61,031,402
<RECEIVABLES>                                  951,619
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           108,884,943
<PP&E>                                      13,657,049
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,756,628
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             117,595,097
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,586,390
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,049
<OTHER-SE>                                 113,968,090
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               117,595,097
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               937,470
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,163,358
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,225,888)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,225,888)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000824481
<NAME> HICKORY HILLS, LTD.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         103,869
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 128,962
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          128,158
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         804
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   128,962
<SALES>                                        432,650
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               (10,299)
<CGS>                                          418,573
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  462,473
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               413,529
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (423,828)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (423,828)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              2,400,695
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,976,867
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 1,098.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 1,098.26
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

PORTLAND DNISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Plaintiff, 

Case No. 3:16-CR-00051-13-BR 

v. 

DAVID LEE FRY, 

SUPPLEMENTAL FINDINGS 

REGARDING DEFENDANT'S 

MOTION TO REVOKE 

DETENTION ORDER 

Defendant. 

Jones, J. 

In addition to the findings noted in the minutes of proceedings [364] of the hearing as to 

' 

defendant's motion to revoke his detention order, I make these additional findings to support my 

decision to deny defendant's motion to revoke: 

• Defendant was on probation for a crime committed in Ohio when he left the state 

without the permission of his probation officer and came to Oregon to participate 

in the occupation of the Malheur Wildlife Refuge. 

• Defendant had been previously admitted to a mental health facility, from which 

he escaped by breaking down a door. 

• While at the Malheur Wildlife Refuge, defendant actively participated in the 

events with a weapon strapped on him. 

Dated this /i-1" of ~c;;£, " , 2016 

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 414 Filed 04/14/16 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

GUADALUPE AVINA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

BERT'S AUTO SALVAGE, et al., 

Defendants. 

MOSMAN, District Judge. 

Case No. 2:15-cv-00012-MO 

ORDER TO DISMISS 

Plaintiff moves to voluntarily dismiss this civil action. 

Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss (#9) is granted, and this action is 

dismissed without prejudice. 

Ill 

Ill 

Ill 

Ill 

Ill 

1 - ORDER TO DISMISS 

Case 2:15-cv-00012-MO Document 10 Filed 03/12/15 Page 1 of 2
Plaintiff also asks the court to recall its previous Order 

(#8) calling for the collection of the $350.00 filing fee. 

Plaintiff's request is denied on the basis that the collection of 

the filing fee is required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act. 28 

u.s.c. § 1915 (b) (1). 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this ~day of March, 2015. 

United States trict Judge 

2 - ORDER TO DISMISS 

Case 2:15-cv-00012-MO Document 10 Filed 03/12/15 Page 2 of 2
# C_2009047EN.01000101.xml

| 26.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 47/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 47/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5450 — Kühne/HGV/TUI/Hapag-Lloyd)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 47/01)

On 6 February 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5450. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5450. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-3 No. 333-33025, Form S-3 No. 333-47775, Form S-3 No. 333-54251 and Form
S-8 No. 333-32809) of Quest Education Corporation and in the related
Prospectuses of our report dated May 12, 2000, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of Quest Education Corporation included in
this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended March 31, 2000.

                                                           /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
June 22, 2000
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of CD&L, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Albert W. Van Ness, Jr., Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company
          as of the dates presented and the consolidated results of operations
          of the Company for the periods presented.

Dated: November 15, 2004

                                              \s\ Albert W. Van Ness, Jr.
                                              ----------------------------
                                              Albert W. Van Ness, Jr.
                                              Chief Executive Officer

     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
     906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of Section
     1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as
     part of Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure statement.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 has
     been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
     furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
     request.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of SRS Labs, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), UlrichGottschling, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, to his knowledge:

 

1.                                       The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:  February 23, 2010 | By:      | /s/ ULRICH GOTTSCHLING                                   |
|--------------------------------|----------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|                           |     | Ulrich Gottschling                                       |
| * *                       | * * | *Chief Financial Officer  (Principal Financial Officer)* |

 

----
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-94,985-01

EX PARTE STEVEN CHARLES EWTON, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1355716-A IN THE 351ST DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam. NEWELL, J. filed a concurring opinion joined by HERVEY, RICHARDSON,

and WALKER, JJ. KELLER, P.J. filed a dissenting opinion joined by YEARY, J. SLAUGHTER,

J. dissented.

O P I N I O N

Applicant originally pleaded guilty to indecency with a child in exchange for deferred

adjudication community supervision. He was later adjudicated guilty and sentenced to twentyyears’

imprisonment. He filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and

the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends that he was denied his right to an appeal because retained appellate

counsel assured him that the appeal had been filed and was progressing, but failed to timely file a

notice of appeal. The record reflects that appellate counsel filed a timely motion for new trial, but

never filed notice of appeal on Applicant’s behalf.
2

The trial court finds that Applicant was not prejudiced by appellate counsel’s failure to file

notice of appeal because Applicant had no right to appeal. The record does not support these

findings, as Applicant entered an open plea of true and received the maximum sentence for the

offense. Although he signed a waiver of appeal, that waiver included language indicating that this

was a plea bargain case. There is nothing in the record to indicate that Applicant pleaded true

pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, and the judgment adjudicating guilt reflects that he pleaded

true “without an agreed recommendation.” The trial court’s certification of Applicant’s right to

appeal indicates only that he waived his right to appeal. Under Garza v. Idaho, even when a

defendant has waived appeal, his attorney has a duty to file a notice of appeal if the defendant so

requests, and there is a presumption of prejudice if the notice is not filed. Garza v. Idaho, 139 S. Ct.

738, 745 (2019).

Relief is granted. Applicant may file an out-of-time appeal of his conviction in cause number

135571601010 from the 351st District Court of Harris County. Within ten days from the date of this

Court’s mandate, the trial court shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is

indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him

on direct appeal. Should Applicant decide to appeal, he must file a written notice of appeal in the

trial court within thirty days from the date of this Court’s mandate.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to theTexasDepartment ofCriminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles. 

Delivered: OCTOBER 11, 2023

Do not publish
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

PORTLAND DIVISION

JACOBUS RENTMEESTER, 

No. 3:15-cv-00113-MO

Plaintiff, 

JUDGMENT

v. 

NIKE, INC., an Oregon

corporation, 

 Defendant.

MOSMAN, J., 

Based upon my Opinion and Order, 

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant Nike, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss is 

GRANTED. Mr. Rentmeester’s claims are dismissed with prejudice. All pending motions are 

denied as moot. 

DATED this 17th day of June, 2015. 

/s/ Michael W. Mosman 

MICHAEL W. MOSMAN

United States District Judge

1 – JUDGMENT

Case 3:15-cv-00113-MO Document 51 Filed 06/17/15 Page 1 of 1
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALICIA AGUILAR,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-73058

Agency No. A075-709-341

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 15, 2011** 

Before: CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and FISHER, Circuit Judges. 

Alicia Aguilar, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen. We

have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the

FILED

JUN 29 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-73058

denial of a motion to reopen, Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791 (9th Cir.

2005), and we deny the petition for review. 

In her opening brief, Aguilar fails to address, and therefore has waived any

challenge to, the BIA’s determination that her motion to reopen was untimely. See

Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues that are

not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived); see also 8

C.F.R. § 1003.43(e)(1)-(2) (motions to reopen to apply for relief under the

Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act, Pub. L. No. 105-100,

111 Stat. 2160, 2193 (1997), must be filed by September 11, 1998). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
#### In the Matter of Steven Hendricks, Petitioner, v Walter R. Kelly, as Superintendent of Attica Correctional Facility, Respondent.

— Determination unanimously confirmed and *947petition dismissed. Memorandum: There is substantial evidence to support the Hearing Officer’s determination that petitioner violated prison rule 104.12. That rule provides that "[i]nmates shall not lead, organize, participate or urge other inmates to participate in work-stoppages, sit-ins, lock-ins or other action which may be detrimental to the order of the facility” (7 NYCRR 270.1 [b] [5] [in]). The evidence established that petitioner, a dining room attendant, spoke to 20 to 25 inmates who were approaching the prison dining room, after which most left the area without eating. Petitioner was then heard to inform another inmate that the food was adulterated. This incident coincided with a widespread inmate protest of prison rules resulting in refusal of inmates to appear for meals. There was thus sufficient evidence on which the Hearing Officer could conclude that petitioner had urged others to participate in "action which may be detrimental to the order of the facility”. (Article 78 proceeding transferred by order of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Pine and Balio, JJ.
#### DREW, Respondent, v. WARD, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

December 16, 1896.)

Action by David Drew against Truman L. Ward.

No opinion. Judgment of the county court of Steuben county modified so as to modify the justice’s judgment so that it shall award to the plaintiff $30 damages and costs of the action, with $10 costs and disbursements to the plaintiff in the county court; and the judgment of the county court, as so modified, is affirmed, without costs to either party in this court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      54,763,937
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               21,103,971
<ALLOWANCES>                                   991,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            82,744,543
<PP&E>                                       8,683,623
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,181,306
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              97,696,202
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,409,526
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    72,337,154
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,084,660
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                97,696,202
<SALES>                                      9,957,153
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,254,208
<CGS>                                        1,792,089
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,544,040
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,724,707
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (511,777)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,497,238
<INCOME-TAX>                                   493,761
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,003,477
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,003,477
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PATHOGENESIS CORPORATION FOR THE
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       4,480,597
<SECURITIES>                                37,033,085
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,450,155
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                 15,652,052
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            63,866,425
<PP&E>                                      29,321,215
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,229,185
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              97,677,613
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,803,772
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,395
<OTHER-SE>                                  86,857,446
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                97,677,613
<SALES>                                     24,121,584
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            24,561,447
<CGS>                                        4,748,990
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               32,807,678
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               112,584
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F2>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             401,669
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,237,263)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,237,263)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,237,263)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.44)
<FN>
<F1>THE AMOUNT OF RECEIVABLES REPORTED IS NET OF $1,927,416 OF ALLOWANCES.
<F2>THE TOTAL COSTS INCLUDE LOSS PROVISION OF $78,231.
</FN>


</TABLE>