alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM LUMISYS
INCORPORATED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AT JUNE 30, 2000 AND CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                            8467                    8467
<SECURITIES>                                      6953                    6953
<RECEIVABLES>                                     3712                    3712
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1537                    1537
<INVENTORY>                                       3509                    3509
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 23758                   23758
<PP&E>                                             705                     705
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   24463                   24463
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             5237                    5237
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             9                       9
<OTHER-SE>                                       27756                   27756
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     24463                   24463
<SALES>                                           5130                   10282
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  5130                   10282
<CGS>                                             2684                    5564
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2684                    5564
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  2982                    5864
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (243)                   (456)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (293)                   (690)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (293)                   (690)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (293)                   (690)
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (293)                   (690)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.03)                   (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)                   (.07)


</TABLE>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Cropping Systems Research Laboratory: Lubbock, TX
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Lubbock, Texas Cropping Systems Research Laboratory Docs CSRL Field Day 2023







CSRL Field Day 2023headline bar /ARSUserFiles/30960500/CSRL Field Day 2023/Field Day _CSRL_Lubbock_Save Date _Aug15_2023.jpg


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of CD&L, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Albert W. Van Ness, Jr., Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company
         as of the dates presented and the consolidated results of operations of
         the Company for the periods presented.

Dated: May 20, 2003


                                               \s\ Albert W. Van Ness, Jr.
                                               -------------------------------
                                               Albert W. Van Ness, Jr.
                                               Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 5



CERTIFICATION



I, Michael L. Carroll, certify that:



1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Cumberland Resources Ltd.;



2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.  The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and



5.  The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  March 30, 2006



/s/ Michael L. Carroll



Senior Vice-President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, SANOFI MATURE 

IP, 

Plaintiffs-Appellees

v.

SANDOZ INC., 

Defendant-Appellant

______________________

2023-2264

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

District of Delaware in No. 1:20-cv-00804-RGA, 1:20-cv00646-RGA, 1:20-cv-00761-RGA, 1:20-cv-00803-RGA,

Judge Richard G. Andrews.

______________________

O R D E R

The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that:

(1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App. 

P. 42 (b).

Case: 23-2264 Document: 10 Page: 1 Filed: 10/06/2023
2 SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC V. SANDOZ INC.

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

October 6, 2023

Date /s/ Jarrett B. Perlow

Jarrett B. Perlow 

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: October 6, 2023

Case: 23-2264 Document: 10 Page: 2 Filed: 10/06/2023
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Communications & Power Industries
Holding Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 4,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Joel Littman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Joel Littman


Joel Littman
Chief Financial Officer
August 8, 2003
#### State *of*Connecticut *v.*Douglas Bennett

*Aaron P. Slitt,*in support of the motion.

Submitted May 23

decided June 3, 1975

The defendant’s. application to permit Attorney James Michael Merberg of the Massachusetts bar to appear pro hac vice is granted to the extent that Attorney Merberg is granted permission to participate in the preparation and argument of the appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County subject to the presence and responsibility of a member of the Connecticut bar, as provided in § 15A of the Practice Book.
#### Segundo Once et al., Respondents, v Service Center of New York et al., Defendant, and 218 W 72nd St. Realty Corp. et al., Appellants.

[947 NYS2d 4]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Jane Goodman, J.), entered October 19, 2011, which granted plaintiffs’ motion to set aside the jury verdict awarding plaintiffs $50,000 and $10,000, respectively, for past and future pain and suffering and finding plaintiff 70% liable, to the extent of directing a new trial unless the parties stipulated to increase the awards for past and future pain and suffering, respectively, to $75,000 and $150,000, and to assess plaintiffs liability at 15%, unanimously modified, on the law, to set aside the apportionment of fault to plaintiff, and to direct a new trial solely as to damages for past and future pain and suffering unless defendants stipulate to the trial court’s reduced award, and to the entry of judgment in accordance therewith, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

In cases involving a claim pursuant to Labor Law § 241 (6), contributory and comparative negligence are viable defenses *(see Rizzuto v L.A. Wenger Contr. Co.,*91 NY2d 343, 350 [1998]). However, contrary to appellants’ contention, no evidence of culpable conduct on the part of plaintiff was shown here. The jury found that the power saw provided by appellants had no guard, in violation of Industrial Code (12 NYCRR) § 23-1.12 (c), and that no other adequate devices were available to plaintiff *(see Tounkara v Fernicola,*80 AD3d 470, 471 [2011]; *Bajor v 75 E. End Owners Inc.,*89 AD3d 458 [2011]). There is no evidence that plaintiff misused the saw, which he had been directed to use *(compare Leon v Peppe Realty Corp.,*190 AD2d 400 [1993]). Thus, upon a search of the record, judgment in favor of plaintiff on the issue of liability is granted *(see Merritt Hill Vineyards v Windy Hgts. Vineyard,*61 NY2d 106 [1984]; *Cohen v Hallmark Cards,*45 NY2d 493, 499 [1978]; *see also Curley v Consolidated*
      *484
      *Rail Corp.,*178 AD2d 318 [1991], *affd*81 NY2d 746 [1992], *cert denied*508 US 940 [1993]).

The trial court properly found that the jury’s award of $50,000 for past pain and suffering and $10,000 for future pain and suffering over a period of 27 years deviates materially, to the extent indicated, from what is reasonable compensation for plaintiffs amputation of the distal portion of his ring finger *(see*CPLR 5501 [c]; *Ramos v City of New York,*68 AD3d 632 [2009]; *Biejanov v Guttman,*34 AD3d 710 [2006]; *Bradshaw v 845 U.N. Ltd. Partnership,*2 AD3d 191 [2003]; *Fields v City Univ. of N.Y.,*216 AD2d 87 [1995]). However, we modify to substitute “unless defendants stipulate” for “unless the parties stipulate” because the only parties required to stipulate to the reduced awards were defendants, as the nonmovants *(see Konfidan v FF Taxi, Inc.,*95 AD3d 471 [2012]; *O’Connor v Papertsian,*309 NY 465, 471 [1956]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Moskowitz, Acosta and Abdus-Salaam, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2011 NY Slip Op 32712(U).]
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09**  **- 7224** 

STUART WAYNE TOMPKINS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. DAVID MITCHELL, Superintendent , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Asheville

. Graham C. Mullen , Senior District Judge. ( 1:08

- cv - 00322

- GCM )

Submitted : February 17, 2010 Decided: March 4 , 2010

Before WILKINSON , GREGORY, and SHEDD , Circuit Judges.

Remanded by un published p er curiam opinion

. Stuart Wayne Tompkins, Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Bulluck Ricci, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Stuart Wayne Tompkins seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. The district court entered its order on April 14, 2009. Tompkins filed his notice of appeal on June 23, 2009. Attached to his notice of appeal, Tompkins pro vided a sworn statement that he did not receive notice of the district court’s order until June 21, 2009. Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), un less the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of
Corr. , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) ( internal quotation marks and citation omitted); see Bowles v. Russell

Tompkins’ notice of appeal is clearly untimely. However, w e construe Tompkins’ notice of appeal as a motion to reopen the time to appeal. , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

See United States v. Feuver , 236 F.3d 725, 729 n.7 (D.C. Cir. 2001). Accordingly, we remand the case to the district court for the limited purpose of permitting that court to determine whether Tom p kins can satisfy the requirements for reopening the appeal period set forth in Rule3 4(a)(6). See Ogden v. San Juan County

REMANDED , 32 F.3d 452, 454 (10th Cir. 1994). The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration.
GCDAMP

Technical Work Group 

October TWG Meeting

October 14, 2020

1
GCDAMP Updates

•DOI & Fed Family Staffing

o Reclamation – Daniel Picard Acting DFO; Jackie Gould Acting RD

o USGS – Mike Moran, Acting GCMRC Chief; Scott VanderKooi

Acting Southwest Biological Science Center Director

o NPS – GRCA Superintendent Ed Keable

o WAPA – CRSP Manager Tim Vigil

• FY 2021 Funding

o Continuing Resolution –> H.R. 8337

o E&W Bill passed the House w/ $21.4M in hydropower revenues

 H.R. 7613 (Sec 306) –> H.R. 7617 Minibus 

• FY 2023 Funding Uncertainty 

o Reduction in power revenues to $12.5M

2
LTEMP Flow Experiments 

w/ 2021 Potential

GCD Experimental Flow Duration Implementation 

Window

Fall HFE up to 96 hours October - November

Extended Duration Fall HFE 97- 192* or 97-250 hours*** October - November

Spring HFE∆ up to 96 hours March – April

Proactive Spring HFE∆◊ 24 hours** April – June

Trout Management Flows up to 3 cycles/month for 4 months May – August

Macroinvertebrate Flows target 2-3 replicates May – August

∆ no Spring HFE in same WY as extended duration Fall HFE

◊ no proactive Spring HFE in same WY as sediment-driven Spring HFE

* First test not to exceed 192 hours

** First test 24 hours

*** After first test, up to 250 hours

Other Potential Flow Actions 

• Apron Repair + Potential FLAHG Hydrograph Test (March)

• Overflight (steady 8,000 cfs for 5 days in May)
4
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 196 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 196

To amend the Public Buildings Act of 1959 to require the Administrator 
of General Services to prioritize construction and alteration projects 
 in accordance with merit-based needs criteria, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 22, 1997

  Mr. McCain introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Public Buildings Act of 1959 to require the Administrator 
of General Services to prioritize construction and alteration projects 
 in accordance with merit-based needs criteria, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Buildings Construction and 
Alteration Funding Improvement Act''.

SEC. 2. PRIORITIZATION OF FEDERAL BUILDINGS CONSTRUCTION AND ALTERATION 
              FUNDING REQUESTS.

    (a) In General.--The Public Buildings Act of 1959 is amended by 
inserting after section 6 (40 U.S.C. 605) the following:

``SEC. 6A. PRIORITIZATION OF FEDERAL BUILDINGS CONSTRUCTION AND 
              ALTERATION FUNDING REQUESTS.

    ``(a) Annual Submission to Congress.--As part of the submission to 
Congress of the budget of the United States Government for a fiscal 
year under section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, the President 
shall submit a list, in order of need (as determined in accordance with 
the regulations issued under subsection (b)), of projects for the 
construction and alteration of public buildings for which 
authorizations of appropriations are requested for the fiscal year.
    ``(b) Criteria for Determining Need.--The Administrator shall issue 
regulations specifying merit-based criteria for determining the 
relative need for a project described in subsection (a).''.
    (b) Building Project Surveys.--Section 11(b) of the Act (40 U.S.C. 
610(b)) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``In the case of 
a surveyed project for the construction or alteration of a public 
building, the report shall specify the relative need (as determined in 
accordance with the regulations issued under section 6A(b)) for the 
project with respect to all other such surveyed projects that are not 
approved under section 7(a).''.
                                 <all>
```
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1800 

To require the Commissioner of Social Security to update the medicalvocational guidelines used in disability determinations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 15, 2015 

Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas (for himself, Mrs. BLACK, Mr. REED, Mrs. MIMI

WALTERS of California, and Mr. MARCHANT) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To require the Commissioner of Social Security to update 

the medical-vocational guidelines used in disability determinations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Guiding Responsible 

5 and Improved Disability Decisions Act of 2015’’ or the 

6 ‘‘GRIDD Act of 2015’’. 

7 SEC. 2. UPDATING OF MEDICAL-VOCATIONAL GUIDELINES. 

8 As soon as possible after the date of the enactment 

9 of this Act, the Commissioner of Social Security shall preVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:54 Apr 18, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1800.IH H1800

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1800 IH

1 scribe rules and regulations that update the medical-voca2 tional guidelines, as set forth in appendix 2 to subpart 

3 P of part 404 of title 20, Code of Federal Regulations, 

4 used in disability determinations, including full consider5 ation of new employment opportunities made possible by 

6 advances in treatment, rehabilitation, and technology and 

7 full consideration of the effect of prevalent languages on 

8 education. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS