alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 52006AP0559 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52006AP0559

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 89/552/EEC on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities (COM(2005)0646 - C6-0443/2005 - 2005/0260(COD)) **

*
Official Journal 317 E , 23/12/2006 P. 0407 - 0408 *

20061223

P6_TA(2006)0559

Coordination of certain of the Member States' provisions on television broadcasting ***I

European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 89/552/EEC on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities (COM(2005)0646 — C6-0443/2005 — 2005/0260(COD))

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2005)0646) [1],

- having regard to Article 251(2) and Articles 47(2) and 55 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0443/2005),

- having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Culture and Education and the opinions of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality (A6-0399/2006);

1. Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

2. Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

3. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
#### BROWN v. MAYOR, ETC., OF CITY OF NEW YORK.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 20, 1896.)

Action by Walston H. Brown against the may- or, etc., of the city of New York.

No opinion. Motion granted, upon payment of $10 costs.
| Exhibit 32.1 | Certification of Principal Executive Officer |
|--------------|----------------------------------------------|

|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ William E. Ladin, Jr.                |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | William E. (Billy) Ladin, Jr.            |
|   | Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief |
|   | Financial Officer                        |
|   | Date: May 13, 2011                       |

----
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. JASON WEBB, Defendant - Appellant. No. 13-10021D.C. No. 2:12-cr-00049-KJDPAL-1
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Kent J. Dawson, District Judge, Presiding Submitted October 23, 2013 ** Before: HUG, FARRIS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. Jason Webb appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 77-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S .C. § 1291, and we affirm. 

# FILED
JAN 27 2014 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).Webb contends that the district court erred when it denied him a departure for imperfect duress under U.S.S.G. § 5K2.12. We do not review a district court’s decision regarding whether to depart from the Sentencing Guidelines range. United States v. Vasquez-Cruz , 692 F.3d 1001, 1005-08 (9th Cir. 2012); United States v. Mohamed , 459 F.3d 979, 987 (9th Cir. 2006). Instead, if an appellant contends that the district court erred wh en deciding whether to grant a departure, we review the ultimate sentence fo r substantive reasonableness. Vasquez-Cruz , 692 F.3d at 1008; Mohamed , 459 F.3d at 987. Webb contends that Mohamed is no longer good law because the Sentencing Commission subsequently amended U.S.S.G. § 1B1.1 and because the S upreme Court imp licitly overruled Mohamed in United States v. Irizarry , 553 U.S. 708 (2008). We already have rejected these arguments. See Vasquez-Cruz , 692 F.3d at 1005-08 (holding that amendment to § 1B1.1 did not abrogate Mohamed ); United States v. Tankersley , 537 F.3d 1100, 1114 n.11 (9th Cir. 2008) (rejecting argument that Irizarry undermined Mohamed). We therefore review Webb’s senten ce for substantive reasonableness, applying an abuse of discretion standard. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The 77-month sentence, which is at the bottom of the applicable Guidelines range, is substantively reas onable in light of the totality of the circumstances and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, including Webb’s prior 2conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm and other extensive criminal history, the seriousness of the offense, and the need for the sentence to promote respect for the law and provide deterrence. See id. AFFIRMED
.

3
#### ZAVELLO v. WOODRUFF.

(Decided April 23, 1913.)

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. E. C. Crowe.

S. B. Stern, and C. B. Powell, for appellant.

N. L. Steele, for appellee.

Per curiam.

Errors confessed. Reversed and remanded.
FRYINGPAN RIVER NEAR RUEDI, CO.Latitude: 39.366Longitude: -106.826Elevation: 7473.25

FRYINGPAN RIVER NEAR RUEDI, CO.

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Chapman Tunnel Site Page...



Chapman Tunnel

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Ivanhoe Site Page...



Ivanhoe

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Kiln Site Page...



Kiln

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Nast Lake Site Page...



Nast Lake
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Bull Investment Group, Inc., et al.

*Daniel R. Schaefer,*assistant attorney general, for the appellee (state).

*Daniel J. Hagearty,*for the appellant (defendant).

Argued June 3

decided June 3, 1975

The plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County is denied.
WIND RIVER BYPASSLatitude: 40.33Longitude: -105.58Elevation: None

Wind River Bypass

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Wild Basin Site Page...



Wild Basin

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Bear Lake Site Page...



Bear Lake

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Copeland Lake Site Page...



Copeland Lake
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Majestic Star
Casino, LLC and The Majestic Star Casino Capital Corp. (collectively, the
"Registrant") for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Don H. Barden,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, and Jon S. Bennett,
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Registrant.

Dated: March 31, 2005

/s/ Don H. Barden
-----------------
Don H. Barden
President and Chief Executive Officer
The Majestic Star Casino, LLC and
The Majestic Star Casino Capital Corp.

/s/ Jon S. Bennett
-------------------
Jon S. Bennett
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
The Majestic Star Casino, LLC and
The Majestic Star Casino Capital Corp.
#### HANN, Respondent, v. WEBER, Appellant.

(City Court of New York, General Term.

November 30, 1896.)

Action by Howard D. Hann against Louise Weber. Nicholas & Bacon, for appellant. Earley & Predergast, for respondent.

CONLAN, J.

Appeal from a judgment entered on the verdict of a jury in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial. The action is one for broker’s commissions on the exchange of real estate. The evidence of the plaintiff tended to show the employment of the plaintiff by the defendant to sell or exchange her property at No. 169 West 115th street. That about October 12th plaintiff did procure and bring her a person wishing to exchange his property, No. 69 East 104th street, for the property of the defendant, and that she consented to the exchange. This testimony is denied by the defendant, and the questions of fact thus raised were fairly submitted to the jury. If there was any error in the admission of the deeds, as urged by the appellant, it was cured by the judge’s charge upon the defendant’s request. The judgment and order are affirmed, with costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001000897
<NAME>                        Azurel LTD. and Subsidaries
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     u.s.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         253,422
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,952,923
<ALLOWANCES>                                   50,000
<INVENTORY>                                    1,160,153
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,742,380
<PP&E>                                         2,995,583
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,496,815
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7,605,657
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,814,140
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3,879
<OTHER-SE>                                     (493,868)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7,605,657
<SALES>                                        3,298,286
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,298,286
<CGS>                                          2,562,942
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,562,942
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               918,015
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             104,542
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (287,213)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (287,213)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Beverly Nestler, Respondent, v William Nestler, Jr., Appellant.

— Main, J.

Appeals (1) from that part of an order of the Family Court of Columbia County (Zittell, J.), entered March 7, 1986, which, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, adjudged that respondent had failed to purge himself of contempt of court and directed that he be remanded to the Columbia County Jail for a period of 30 days, and (2) from an order of said court, entered March 7, 1986, which committed respondent to the Columbia County Jail for a period of 30 days.

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act § 454, Family *837Court found that respondent had willfully failed to obey a lawful order for support payments and found respondent to be in contempt of court. However, Family Court provided respondent with the opportunity to purge himself of the contempt by (1) filing an undertaking in the amount of $10,000 or demonstrating by clear and convincing evidence his inability to obtain such undertaking, and (2) paying the amount due to petitioner as arrearages. At a subsequent hearing, respondent was prepared to pay the amount due as arrearages; however, he presented proof that neither banks nor insurance companies would issue a bond in the amount of the undertaking. Although Family Court acknowledged respondent’s inability to obtain a bond from a bank or an insurance company, it found that respondent did not make a sufficient effort to obtain the undertaking and, accordingly, failed to purge the contempt finding. Respondent was ordered to be committed to the Columbia County Jail for a 30-day period.

On this appeal, respondent contends that he sufficiently demonstrated that he could not obtain the $10,000 undertaking and therefore should have been purged of the contempt. We disagree. The decision of whether to punish as contempt noncompliance with a court’s decree and the fixing of conditions by which the contemnor may purge himself rest in the sound discretion of the court *(see, Busch v Berg,*52 AD2d 1082; *Matter of Storm,*28 AD2d 290, 293). Here, respondent was required to demonstrate by "clear and convincing” evidence his inability to provide a $10,000 undertaking. It appears that all respondent did to attempt to obtain the undertaking was fill out two bank applications and have his attorney contact two insurance brokers. Family Court noted, however, that respondent was able to suddenly obtain an amount in excess of $2,000 to pay the support arrearages and that the source of those funds was not demonstrated to be unavailable as a source for at least part of the required undertaking. We agree with Family Court that respondent has failed to demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence his inability to obtain the undertaking, and thus find no abuse of discretion in Family Court’s finding that respondent did not purge himself of contempt.

Orders affirmed, with costs. Kane, J. P., Main, Weiss, Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

SAI MONAHANS BROTHER

HOSPITALITY, LLC

,

Appellant,

v.

MONAHANS ECONOMIC

DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION and

CITY OF MONAHANS, TEXAS

,

Appellees. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 2 1

- 00 060

- CV

Appeal from the

143rd Judicial District Court

of Ward County, Texas

(TC # 20

- 10

- 25580

- CVW )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the

judgment. We therefore reverse the judgment of the court below granting Appellee’s plea to the

jurisdiction and remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedi ngs consistent with this

Court’s opinion.

We further order that the trial court’s order granting the City’s plea to the jurisdiction is

affirmed, but accord Appellant the right to replead.

We further order that Appellant recover from Appellee all costs of this appeal, for which

let execution issue. This decision shall be certified below for observance.IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 24 TH DAY OF AUGUST , 2022.

JEFF ALLEY, Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1766 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1766

 To amend the Equal Credit Opportunity Act to repeal a small business 
                   loan data collection requirement.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 14, 2015

Mr. Pittenger introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Equal Credit Opportunity Act to repeal a small business 
                   loan data collection requirement.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Right to Lend Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. SMALL BUSINESS LOAN DATA COLLECTION REQUIREMENT.

    (a) Repeal.--Section 704B of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (15 
U.S.C. 1691c-2) is repealed.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Section 701(b) of the Equal Credit 
Opportunity Act (15 U.S.C. 1691(b)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (3), by inserting ``or'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (4), by striking ``; or'' and inserting a 
        period; and
            (3) by striking paragraph (5).
    (c) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for title VII of the 
Consumer Credit Protection Act is amended by striking the item relating 
to section 704B.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996

<CASH>                                                0
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      0
<PP&E>                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 0
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                          9,391
<OTHER-SE>                                       (9,391)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          0
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      0
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (234,509)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (204,596)
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (439,105)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (.64)
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1



EX-32.1 6 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF WILLIAM E. LADIN



CERTIFICATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Internet America, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William E. Ladin, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:



(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ William E. Ladin, Jr.William E. Ladin, Jr.Chief Executive OfficerDate: May 17, 2004
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the report of Impac Mortgage Holdings, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/  JOSEPH R. TOMKINSON   |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
| Joseph  R. Tomkinson       |   |
| *Chief  Executive Officer* |   |
| August 16,  2010      |   |
|                       |   |
| /s/  TODD R. TAYLOR        |   |
| Todd  R. Taylor            |   |
| *Chief  Financial Officer* |   |
| August 16,  2010      |   |

 

----