alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001001188
<NAME> CARNEGIE GROUP, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       7,246,188
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,725,551
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,777,662
<PP&E>                                       2,734,548
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,234,973
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,331,386
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        67,726
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,733,989
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,234,973
<SALES>                                        359,630
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,603,429
<CGS>                                        4,908,110
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,903,948
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,403
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,108,460)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   123,721
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,232,181)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,232,181)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.34)
        

</TABLE>
#### State *of*Connecticut *v.*Henry A. McClain

*Henry A. McClain,*pro se, in support of the motion.

Submitted March 13

decided March 19, 1975

The defendant’s pro se motion “Affidavit in Support of Motion to Accept Layman’s Appeal Brief As Is and G-rant Appeal on the Pull Record” is denied in the absence of a finding.
Glen Canyon Dam Releases

Most Probably Hydrology (based on May 2002 Final F

0

2000400060008000

1000012000140001600018000

O ct-01

N ov-01

D ec-01

Jan-02 Feb-02

Mar-02

Apr-02

M ay-02

Jun-02

J ul-02

Aug-02 Sep-02

O ct-02

N ov-02

D ec-02

Jan-03 F

b03

Average CFS

Without Experimental Flows

With Experimental Flows
Exp Flows - Specific Ob

♦ decrease downstream export of 

sediment from Marble Canyon

♦ increase short term retention of 

stored in channel through low floterm retention of sediment in shothrough BHBFs

♦ reduce non-native fish abundanc

improve survival and recruitment reducing competition and predat

♦ improve and maintain habitat for 

fish
Remaining discussion 

• Nature of Scenario 1 fall flows• Economic impact of experimenta• What is the sediment input resou

silt, clay, native fish habitat)

• Attenuation of fluctuations• Paria input trigger volume (1.4 m 
Scenario 1. GCMRC Recommended Water Year 2002-03 

0

5,000

10,00015,00020,00025,00030,00035,00040,00045,00050,000

Aug-02

Sep-02

Oct-02

Nov-02

Dec-02

Jan-03

Feb-03

Mar-03

Apr-03

May-03

Date

Discharge

ROD 

Flows

Tributary Sediment Input

Low Steady Flows to RetainSediment. Could be low levelROD Flows

BHBF - 45,000 cfs. or higher Fluctuating Flows for

Sediment Re-working and Disadvantaging Nonnative Fish Combinedwith Removal of Nonnative Salmonids in theLCR Reach

ROD Ope
Next Steps

• Final discussion with TWG to• Receive comments from Colo

River Management Work Gro

• Prepare monitoring and rese

(GCMRC, scientists and AMP

• Decision by Secretary Norton• Environmental compliance (E

NEPA, NHPA)
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Dairy Forage Research: Madison, WI
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Madison, Wisconsin U.S. Dairy Forage Research Center Dairy Forage Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Research Programs and Projects at this LocationARS research is organized into National Programs. Within each National Program are research projects. Listed below are  the National Programs and research projects currently conducted at this location.
Clicking on a National Program (NP) will take you  to the main ARS site for more information on the program. Clicking on a research  project title will take you to more information on the project.  Current View: All Projects   Show All Projects ||
         Appropriated Projects Only


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Raymond Hamilton, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Green-berg, J.), rendered October 24, 1985, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues *589which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mangano, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.
##### 



Exhibit 32

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Annual Report of Nextel
Communications, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Timothy M. Donahue, President &
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C.§ 1350 (as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) that, to the best of my
knowledge:



| |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) the Report fully complies with the
    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|
| | (2) the information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |                                    
| | -----------------------------------
| | /s/ TIMOTHY M. DONAHUE             
| |                                    
| | Timothy M. Donahue                 
| | President & Chief Executive Officer

Date: March 11, 2004



---



##### 



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Annual Report of Nextel
Communications, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Paul N. Saleh, Executive Vice President
& Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350 (as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) that, to the
best of my knowledge:



| |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) the Report fully complies with the
    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|
| | (2) the information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |                                                       
| | ------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ PAUL N. SALEH                                     
| |                                                       
| | Paul N. Saleh                                         
| | Executive Vice President & Chief Financial
    Officer

Date: March 11, 2004
EXHIBIT 31.2
                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14 AND 15d-14
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Julie Seaman, Chief Financial Officer of US Global Nanospace, Inc. (the
"Company"), certify that:

      I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of US Global
Nanospace, Inc.

      Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report.

      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in the report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
and for, the periods, presented in the report.

      The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a- 15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

            (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which the periodic report is being prepared;

            (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

            (c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Company's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting;
and

      The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Company's auditors and to the audit committee of the Company's board of
directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent function):

            (i) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

            (ii) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control
over financial reporting.


Dated:  August 15, 2005


/s/ Julie Seaman
-----------------------
Julie Seaman
Chief Financial Officer
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Pest Management Research: Sidney, MT
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    NPARL
                        Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory
                                    Agricultural Systems Research Unit
                                    Grasshoppers: Their Biology, Identification and ManagementSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Sidney, Montana Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory Pest Management Research PMRU Docs Grasshoppers: Their Biology, Identification and Management: Outbreak and Survey Info





- NPARL Home
- PMRU Home
- ASRU Home
- Site Highlights
- Outbreak and Survey Info
- ID Tools | Apps
- Grasshopper Management
- IPM Handbook
- USDA Research | Contact Info

Outbreak Info: 2014 Mormon Cricket Survey Mapheadline bar /ARSUserFiles/30320505/grasshopper/Extras/images/Maps/GH2014_MC.jpg Return to Outbreak Info


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
# L_2009042EN.01001601.xml

| 13.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 42/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 42/16

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 10 February 2009

appointing a United Kingdom member of the Committee of the Regions

(2009/122/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 263 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Government of the United Kingdom,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 24 January 2006, the Council adopted Decision 2006/116/EC appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2006 to 25 January 2010 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 24 January 2006, the Council adopted Decision 2006/116/EC appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2006 to 25 January 2010 (1).

| (2) | A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the expiry of the mandate of Mr W.J. WILLIAMS, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the expiry of the mandate of Mr W.J. WILLIAMS,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following is hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions as a member for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2010:

| — | Mr Robert BRIGHT, Councillor, Newport City. |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr Robert BRIGHT, Councillor, Newport City.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 10 February 2009.

For the Council

The President

M. KALOUSEK

---

(1)  
  OJ L 56, 25.2.2006, p. 75.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) INTERIM
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND BALANCE SHEET AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) FORM 10-Q COMMUNICATIONS &
POWER INDUSTRIES, INC. FOR THE QUARTER ENDED APRIL 3, 1998
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001000564
<NAME> COMMUNICATIONS & POWER INDUSTRIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-02-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-04-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-03-1998
<CASH>                                             327
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   47,730
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     53,405
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               109,992
<PP&E>                                          78,562
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 233,400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           69,500
<BONDS>                                        129,137
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           19,075
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,687
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   233,400
<SALES>                                        126,175
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               126,175
<CGS>                                           93,480
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   93,480
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,719
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,121
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,194
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,198
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,996
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,996
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-30138

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

HARRIS ROBERTSON

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:07-CR-108-1

Before KING, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Harris Robertson was arrested after he agreed to smuggle various

contraband items, including a quantity of cocaine base, into the Tangipahoa

Parish Jail. Robertson pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute five

grams or more of cocaine base, a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841. He was sentenced

to 51 months of imprisonment, which was within the applicable guidelines

range. 

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 20, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-30138

2

The abuse-of-discretion standard of review applies to appellate review of

sentencing decisions. Gall v. United States, 128 S. Ct. 586, 594 (2007). A

sentence imposed within a properly calculated guidelines range is presumptively

reasonable. United States v. Alonzo, 435 F.3d 551, 554 (5th Cir.2006); see also

Gall, 128 S. Ct. at 594. 

On appeal, Robertson argues that his sentence was unreasonable because

the district court failed to take into account the Government’s role in selecting

cocaine base as the drug to be smuggled, which he argues constituted sentencing

entrapment. We have not yet determined whether sentencing entrapment, or

the related concept of sentencing factor manipulation, is a cognizable defense to

a sentence. However, even if we were to do so, Robertson has not shown that he

was persuaded to commit a criminal offense greater than he was predisposed to

commit, or that the Government’s conduct was outrageous. See United States

v. Washington, 44 F.3d 1271, 1280 (5th Cir. 1995).

Robertson does not contend that his sentence is otherwise procedurally or

substantively unreasonable. See Gall, 128 S. Ct. at 596-97. He likewise has not

rebutted the presumption that his sentence, which falls within a properly

calculated sentencing guidelines range, is reasonable. See Alonzo, 435 F.3d at

554. 

AFFIRMED.
734 A.2d 390

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant v. Michael HURD, Appellee. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Michael Hurd, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued Sept. 16, 1998.

Decided July 21, 1999.

*438Philip Levine, Waynesboro, for Michael Hurd.

Michael A. George, Dist. Atty., for the Com.

Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN and SAYLOR, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Based upon our disposition in *Commonwealth v. Williams, 557*Pa. 285, 733 A.2d 593 (1999), we affirm the Order of the Adams County Court of Common Pleas dated April 17, 1998. Furthermore, we remand the matter to the Superior Court for disposition of any remaining issues.

Jurisdiction is relinquished.

Justice CASTILLE files a Dissenting Statement.

CASTILLE, Justice,

dissenting.

I dissent for the reasons expressed in my dissenting opinion in *Commonwealth v. Williams, 557*Pa. 285, 733 A.2d 593 (1999).