alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 6- 22 27

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el le e

v.
Mi lt on Lewis Po ol e, III

ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe ll an t

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Dis tri ctof S ou th Dako ta- Sio ux Fal ls

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Jan ua ry

30 , 20 17 Fi le d: Feb ru ary 8, 2 01 7 [Unpubl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re SM ITH, ARNOLD, an d C OLLOTO N, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

Afte r pl ead in g gu il ty to co ns pi rin g to di st rib ut e a co nt ro ll ed su bs ta nc e, Mi lt on Po ol e ap pe al s the di st ric t co ur t’s be lo w-Gui de li ne s se nt en ce. His co un se l ha s m ov ed 1

The Hon or ab le Karen Sch rei er, Uni te d St at es Dis tri c t J u d g e fo r th e Dis tri ct 1 of So ut h Dak ot a.t o w i t h dr aw an d ha s fil ed a br ie f un de r And ers v. Cal ifo rn ia , 38 6 U.S. 73 8 (1 96 7 ) ,

arg ui ng th atth e se nt en ce was subs ta nt iv el y un reas on ab le

.

W e fin d th at th e di st ric t co ur t di d no t ab us e it s di sc ret io n, as it im po se d th e be lo w-Gui de li ne s s e n t en ce aft er co ns id eri ng th e 18 U.S.C. § 35 53 (a) fact or s, sp eci fic al ly m en ti on in g Mr. Po ol e ’s hi st ory of vi ol at in g pr ob at io n, hi s m us ic al

as pi rat io ns , an d th e effe ct of hi s cri m es on th e co m m un it y

. See Uni t e d S t at es v. M il le r, 55 7 F.3 d 91 0, 91 7 (8 th Ci r. 20 09 ) (u nd er su bs ta nt iv e-re as on ab le ne ss t e s t , di st ric t co ur t ab us es it s di sc ret io n if it fai ls to co ns id er rel ev an t § 3 55 3( a) fact or , g i v e s si gn ifi can t weig ht to im pr op er or irr el ev an t fact or , or co m m it s cl ear e r r o r o f jud gm en t in weig hi ng fact or s) ; Unit ed St at es v. Moo re, 581 F.3 d 68 1, 68 4 (8t h Cir. 20 09 ) (p er cu ria m) (“ [W] he re a d i s t r i c t c ou rt ha s se nt en ced a de fen da nt be lo w th e ad vi so ry gu id el in es ran ge , it is ne arl y in co nc ei vabl e th at th e co ur t ab us ed it s di sc ret io n in no t va ry in g do wnwar d st il l fu rth er.”)

. Hav in g in de pe nd en tl y rev ie wed th e reco rd pu rs ua nt to Pen so n v. Ohi o, 48 8 U.S. 75 (1 98 8) , we fin d no no n- fri vo lo us is su es forap pe al

.

Acco rd in gl y , we affi rm th e jud gm en t an d gr an t co un se l’s m ot io n to withd raw.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the report of Impac Mortgage Holdings, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/  JOSEPH R. TOMKINSON   |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
| Joseph  R. Tomkinson       |   |
| *Chief  Executive Officer* |   |
| November 15,  2010    |   |
|                       |   |
| /s/  TODD R. TAYLOR        |   |
| Todd  R. Taylor            |   |
| *Chief  Financial Officer* |   |
| November 15,  2010    |   |

 

----
Order issued November , 2012 

In The 

Q!:nurt nf Appeals 

1Fiftl1 IDistrict nf wexus at IDaUas 

No. 05-12-00442-CV 

AMERICA FIRST LLOYD'S INSURANCE CO., Appellant 

v. 

HARTFORD LLOYD'S INSURANCE CO., Appellee 

ORDER 

We GRANT appellant's October 26, 2012 motion for an extension of time to file a reply 

brief. Appellant shall file its reply brief on or before December 3, 2012.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1670 

To direct the Architect of the Capitol to place in the United States Capitol 

a chair honoring American Prisoners of War/Missing in Action. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 26, 2015 

Mr. LYNCH (for himself, Mr. BENISHEK, Mr. BISHOP of Utah, Ms. 

BORDALLO, Mr. CARTWRIGHT, Ms. CLARK of Massachusetts, Mr. 

DEUTCH, Mr. JOLLY, Mr. JONES, Mr. KEATING, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. 

KING of New York, Mr. LANCE, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. PETERSON, Mr. 

RANGEL, Mr. RICE of South Carolina, Mr. ROE of Tennessee, and Ms. 

TSONGAS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To direct the Architect of the Capitol to place in the United 

States Capitol a chair honoring American Prisoners of 

War/Missing in Action. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National POW/MIA 

5 Remembrance Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds the following: 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1670 IH

1 (1) In recent years, commemorative chairs hon2 oring American Prisoners of War/Missing in Action 

3 have been placed in prominent locations across the 

4 United States. 

5 (2) The United States Capitol is an appropriate 

6 location to place a commemorative chair honoring 

7 American Prisoners of War/Missing in Action. 

8 SEC. 3. PLACEMENT OF A CHAIR IN UNITED STATES CAP9 ITOL HONORING AMERICAN PRISONERS OF 

10 WAR/MISSING IN ACTION. 

11 (a) OBTAINING CHAIR.—The Architect of the Capitol 

12 shall enter into an agreement to obtain a chair featuring 

13 the logo of the National League of POW/MIA Families 

14 under such terms and conditions as the Architect con15 siders appropriate and consistent with applicable law. 

16 (b) PLACEMENT.—Not later than 2 years after the 

17 date of enactment of this Act, the Architect shall place 

18 the chair obtained under subsection (a) in a suitable per19 manent location in the United States Capitol. 

20 SEC. 4. FUNDING. 

21 (a) DONATIONS.—The Architect of the Capitol 

22 may— 

23 (1) enter into an agreement with any organiza24 tion described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal 

25 Revenue Code of 1986 that is exempt from taxation 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1670 IH

1 under section 501(a) of that Code to solicit private 

2 donations to carry out the purposes of this Act; and 

3 (2) accept donations of funds, property, and 

4 services to carry out the purposes of this Act. 

5 (b) COSTS.—All costs incurred in carrying out the 

6 purposes of this Act shall be paid for with private dona7 tions received under subsection (a). 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

November 20, 2012

d1113

Order 

November 20, 2012

145784

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145784

COA: 308974

Lenawee CC: 10-014926-FH

JASON ALLEN BOONE,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 10, 2012 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
# L_2013008EN.01001901.xml

| 12.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 8/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 8/19

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 of 18 December 2008 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and cooperation in matters relating to maintenance obligations

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 7 of 10 January 2009
  )

On page 21, Article 75(2), points (a) and (b):

for:

‘2.   Sections 2 and 3 of Chapter IV shall apply:

| (a) | to decisions given in the Member States before the date of application of this Regulation for which recognition and the declaration of enforceability are requested as from that date; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

to decisions given in the Member States before the date of application of this Regulation for which recognition and the declaration of enforceability are requested as from that date;

| (b) | to decisions given as from the date of application of this Regulation following proceedings begun before that date, in so far as those decisions fall with the scope of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 for the purposes of recognition and enforcement.’, |
| --- | --- |

(b)

to decisions given as from the date of application of this Regulation following proceedings begun before that date, in so far as those decisions fall with the scope of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 for the purposes of recognition and enforcement.’,

read:

‘2.   Sections 2 and 3 of Chapter IV shall apply:

| (a) | to decisions given in the Member States before the date of application of this Regulation for which recognition and the declaration of enforceability are requested as from that date; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

to decisions given in the Member States before the date of application of this Regulation for which recognition and the declaration of enforceability are requested as from that date;

| (b) | to decisions given as from the date of application of this Regulation following proceedings begun before that date, |
| --- | --- |

(b)

to decisions given as from the date of application of this Regulation following proceedings begun before that date,

in so far as those decisions fall with the scope of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 for the purposes of recognition and enforcement.’.

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with
the Quarterly Report of Optical Cable Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of January 31, 2006, and for the period then ended.



|                     |  |                                           
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Date: March 17, 2006 |  | /s/ Tracy G. Smith                        
|                     |  | Tracy G. Smith                            
|                     |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### In re KERFOOT’S ESTATE.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

December 22, 1896.)

No opinion. Decree affirmed, with costs to be paid by the appellants Thompson personally.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 10, 2013

No. 04-13-00044-CR

Andrea LARRAIN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 1, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 373475

The Honorable John D. Fleming, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, we order this appeal DISMISSED 

FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. 

It is so ORDERED on April 10, 2013.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of April, 2013.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
# L_2009119EN.01001901.xml

| 14.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 119/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 119/19

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 394/2009

of 13 May 2009

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in particular Article 138(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 14 May 2009.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 May 2009.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.

2

---

ANNEX

Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

| (EUR/100 kg) |
| --- |
| CN code | Third country code (1) | Standard import value |
| 0702 00 00 | MA | 55,4 |
| TN | 115,0 |
| TR | 101,9 |
| ZZ | 90,8 |
| 0707 00 05 | JO | 155,5 |
| MA | 41,9 |
| TR | 149,3 |
| ZZ | 115,6 |
| 0709 90 70 | JO | 216,7 |
| TR | 120,2 |
| ZZ | 168,5 |
| 0805 10 20 | EG | 43,3 |
| IL | 54,0 |
| MA | 43,1 |
| TN | 49,2 |
| TR | 102,3 |
| US | 51,0 |
| ZZ | 57,2 |
| 0805 50 10 | AR | 50,9 |
| TR | 48,7 |
| ZA | 62,5 |
| ZZ | 54,0 |
| 0808 10 80 | AR | 81,3 |
| BR | 72,1 |
| CA | 127,2 |
| CL | 85,0 |
| CN | 99,5 |
| MK | 42,0 |
| NZ | 110,2 |
| US | 131,7 |
| UY | 71,7 |
| ZA | 78,8 |
| ZZ | 90,0 |

(EUR/100 kg)

CN code

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

0702 00 00

MA

55,4

TN

115,0

TR

101,9

ZZ

90,8

0707 00 05

JO

155,5

MA

41,9

TR

149,3

ZZ

115,6

0709 90 70

JO

216,7

TR

120,2

ZZ

168,5

0805 10 20

EG

43,3

IL

54,0

MA

43,1

TN

49,2

TR

102,3

US

51,0

ZZ

57,2

0805 50 10

AR

50,9

TR

48,7

ZA

62,5

ZZ

54,0

0808 10 80

AR

81,3

BR

72,1

CA

127,2

CL

85,0

CN

99,5

MK

42,0

NZ

110,2

US

131,7

UY

71,7

ZA

78,8

ZZ

90,0

---

(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
  ZZ
  ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

---
#### William H. Davis *v.*Jean E. Davis

*Catherine P. Kligerman,*in support of the motion.

Submitted April 15

decided May 6, 1975

The plaintiff’s motion for a review of the trial court’s order filed April 7, 1975, in the appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County is granted and the relief requested therein is denied.
Exhibit
4.14


 


PROMISSORY
NOTE


 


FOR
VALUE RECEIVED, Grapefruit Boulevard Investments,
Inc., a California corporation, (“Borrower”) promises to pay to the order of Bradley J. Yourist (“Lender”)
or its assigns, the sum of One Hundred Fifteen Thousand Two Hundred and Forty Eight Dollars
and Fifty One Cents ($115,248.51) in principal, plus interest at a rate of 10% annually on the unpaid balance as set
forth herein.


 


	 	1.	PAYMENT
    TERMS: Borrower shall pay a lump sum on
    September 1, 2019 or before.
	 	 	 
	 	2.	PREPAYMENT:
    Borrower may prepay the loan without any penalty.
	 	 	 
	 	3.	PAYMENT
    APPLICATION: All payments shall first
    be applied to interest and then to principal.
	 	 	 
	 	4.	ATTORNEYS’
    FEES AND COSTS: If the Lender prevails
    in any action to collect on this note, Borrower shall pay Lender’s reasonable costs and attorneys’ fees.
	 	 	 
	 	5.	STATE
    LAW: This note shall be governed in accordance
    with the laws of the State of California.
	 	 	 
	 	6.	MODIFICATIONS:
    Any modifications of or amendments to
    the terms herein shall be made in writing by all of the parties hereto.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF the Lender and Borrower have executed this Note as of the 1st day of May, 2019.


 


	GRAPEFRUIT
    BOULEVARD INVESTMENTS, INC.	 
	 		 
	/s/Daniel Yourist	 
	Borrower
    Signature:	Daniel
    Yourist, CFO	 
	 	 	 
	/s/Bradeley Yourist	 
	Lender
    Signature:	Bradeley
    Yourist	 


 


CONFIDENTIAL
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1814 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1814

    To permanently reauthorize the Land and Water Conservation Fund.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 15, 2015

 Mr. Grijalva (for himself, Mrs. Dingell, Mr. Polis, Mr. Huffman, Mr. 
     Thompson of California, Mr. Ruiz, Mr. Takai, Ms. Kuster, Mr. 
 Cartwright, Ms. Tsongas, Mr. Fitzpatrick, Mr. Meehan, Mr. Guinta, Mr. 
   Gibson, Mr. Costello of Pennsylvania, Mr. Dold, Mr. Reichert, Mr. 
  LoBiondo, and Mr. King of New York) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To permanently reauthorize the Land and Water Conservation Fund.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT REAUTHORIZATION OF LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION 
              FUND.

    (a) In General.--Section 200302 of title 54, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (b), in the matter preceding paragraph 
        (1), by striking ``During the period ending September 30, 2015, 
        there'' and inserting ``There''; and
            (2) in subsection (c)(1), by striking ``through September 
        30, 2015''.
    (b) Public Access.--Section 200306 of title 54, United States Code, 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) Public Access.--Not less than 1.5 percent of amounts made 
available for expenditure in any fiscal year under section 200303, or 
$10,000,000, whichever is greater, shall be used for projects that 
secure recreational public access to existing Federal public land for 
hunting, fishing, and other recreational purposes.''.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 23.02**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-77682, 33-53726, 333-02948, 333-57965, 333-37168, 333-106062and 333-106064 of Caraustar Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form S-8, 333-66943 and 333-65555 of Caraustar Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form S-3, and 333-31618 of Caraustar Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form S-4 of our reportdated March 11, 2004, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Caraustar Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 (which report expresses an unqualifiedopinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, which was adopted by the Company as of January 1, 2003,and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, which was adopted by the Company as of January 1, 2002. 

 

/s/  Deloitte and Touche LLP 

 

Atlanta, Georgia 

March 15, 2004
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-40745

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSEPH JAMES FALCETTA,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:96-CR-59-1

- - - - - - - - - -

December 23, 1998

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Joseph Falcetta has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

Falcetta has filed a brief and a pleading entitled “Motion to

Dismiss,” which are construed as his responses to the Anders

motion. The Clerk is DIRECTED to file these pleadings into the

record. Our independent review of counsel’s brief, the record,

and Falcetta’s responses discloses no nonfrivolous issue. 

Falcetta’s motion for a bench warrant is DENIED. Accordingly,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein and 
No. 97-40745

-2-

Falcetta’s appeal is DISMISSED.