50698 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 173 / Friday, September 10, 2021 / Notices 

11See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD 

Service Requirements Due to COVID–19, 85 FR 

17006 (March 26, 2020); and Temporary Rule 

Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to 

COVID–19; Extension of Effective Period, 85 FR 

41363 (July 10, 2020) (collectively, Temporary 

Rule). 

12See 19 CFR 351.310(d). 

information, until further notice.11 The 

deadlines for submitting case and 

rebuttal briefs on scope issues will be 

established as part of the preliminary 

determination in the companion AD 

investigation. Pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), parties who 

submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in 

this investigation are encouraged to 

submit with each argument: (1) A 

statement of the issue; (2) a brief 

summary of the argument; and (3) a 

table of authorities. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing, limited to issues raised in the 

case and rebuttal briefs, must submit a 

written request to the Assistant 

Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance, U.S. Department of 

Commerce within 30 days after the date 

of publication of this notice. Requests 

should contain the party’s name, 

address, and telephone number, the 

number of participants, and a list of the 

issues to be discussed. Oral 

presentations at the hearing will be 

limited to issues raised in the briefs. If 

a request for a hearing is made, 

Commerce intends to hold the hearing 

at a time and date to be determined.12

Parties should confirm by telephone the 

date and time of the hearing two days 

before the scheduled date. 

International Trade Commission 

Notification 

In accordance with section 703(f) of 

the Act, Commerce will notify the 

International Trade Commission (ITC) of 

its determination. If the final 

determination is affirmative, the ITC 

will determine before the later of 120 

days after the date of this preliminary 

determination or 45 days after the final 

determination whether these imports 

are materially injuring, or threaten 

material injury to, the U.S. industry. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This determination is issued and 

published pursuant to sections 703(f) 

and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.205(c). 

Dated: August 27, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix I 

Scope of the Investigation 

The merchandise covered by this 

investigation consists of gas-powered, walkbehind snow throwers (also known as snow 

blowers), which are snow moving machines 

that are powered by internal combustion 

engines and primarily pedestrian-controlled. 

The scope of the investigation covers certain 

snow throwers (also known as snow 

blowers), whether self-propelled or non-selfpropelled, whether finished or unfinished, 

whether assembled or unassembled, and 

whether containing any additional features 

that provide for functions in addition to 

snow throwing. Subject merchandise also 

includes finished and unfinished snow 

throwers that are further processed in a third 

country or in the United States, including, 

but not limited to, assembly or any other 

processing that would not otherwise remove 

the merchandise from the scope of this 

investigation if performed in the country of 

manufacture of the in-scope snow throwers. 

Walk-behind snow throwers subject to the 

scope of this investigation are powered by 

internal combustion engines which are 

typically spark ignition, single or multiple 

cylinder, and air-cooled with power take off 

shafts. 

For the purposes of this investigation, an 

unfinished and/or unassembled snow 

thrower means at a minimum, a subassembly 

comprised of an engine, auger housing (i.e., 

intake frame), and an auger (or ‘‘auger 

paddle’’) packaged or imported together. An 

intake frame is the portion of the snow 

thrower—typically of aluminum or steel that 

houses and protects an operator from a 

rotating auger and is the intake point for the 

snow. Importation of the subassembly 

whether or not accompanied by, or attached 

to, additional components including, but not 

limited to, handle(s), impeller(s), chute(s), 

track tread(s), or wheel(s) constitutes an 

unfinished snow thrower for purposes of this 

investigation. The inclusion in a third 

country of any components other than the 

snow thrower sub-assembly does not remove 

the snow thrower from the scope. A snow 

thrower is within the scope of this 

investigation regardless of the origin of its 

engine. 

Specifically excluded is merchandise 

covered by the scope of the antidumping and 

countervailing duty orders on certain vertical 

shaft engines between 225cc and 999cc, and 

parts thereof from the People’s Republic of 

China. See Certain Vertical Shaft Engines 

Between 225cc and 999cc, and Parts Thereof, 

from the People’s Republic of China: 

Amended Final Antidumping Duty 

Determination and Antidumping Duty Order, 

86 FR 12623 (March 4, 2021) and Certain 

Vertical Shaft Engines Between 225cc and 

999cc, and Parts Thereof from the People’s 

Republic of China: Countervailing Duty 

Order and Amended Final Affirmative 

Countervailing Duty Determination, 86 FR 

12619 (March 4, 2021). 

Also specifically excluded is merchandise 

covered by the scope of the antidumping and 

countervailing duty orders on certain vertical 

shaft engines between 99cc and Up to 225cc, 

and Parts Thereof From the People’s 

Republic of China. See Certain Vertical Shaft 

Engines Between 99cc and Up to 225cc, and 

Parts Thereof From the People’s Republic of 

China: Antidumping and Countervailing 

Duty Orders, 86 FR 023675 (May 4, 2021). 

The snow throwers subject to this 

investigation are typically entered under 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 

States (HTSUS) subheading 8430.20.0060. 

Certain parts of snow throwers subject to this 

investigation may also enter under HTSUS 

8431.49.9095. The HTSUS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes only, and the written description of 

the merchandise under investigation is 

dispositive. 

Appendix II 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope Comments 

IV. Scope of the Investigation 

V. Injury Test 

VI. Diversification of China’s Economy 

VII. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and 

Adverse Inferences 

VIII. Subsidies Valuation 

IX. Benchmarks and Interest Rates 

X. Analysis of Programs 

XI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–19627 Filed 9–9–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–552–801] 

Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review, 

Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments, and Partial Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2019–2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily determines 

that NTSF Seafoods Joint Stock 

Company (NTSF), a producer and 

exporter of frozen fish fillets (fish fillets) 

from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam 

(Vietnam) did not make sales of subject 

merchandise at prices below normal 

value (NV) during the period of review 

(POR) August 1, 2019, through July 31, 

2020. Commerce also preliminarily 

determines that it is appropriate to 

apply facts available, with adverse 

inferences (AFA) to East Sea Seafoods 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 173 / Friday, September 10, 2021 / Notices 50699 

1See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 

63081 (October 6, 2020). 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Respondent Selection,’’ 

dated January 8, 2021. For purposes of this figure, 

we note that eight companies are part of a single 

entity known as the ‘‘Hung Vuong Group,’’ three 

companies form part of a single entity known as 

‘‘QVD Aquaculture Joint Stock Company,’’ and 

three companies form part of a single entity known 

as ‘‘Vinh Hoan Corporation.’’ 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Preliminary Results of the 2019–2020 Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated April 5, 2021. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review: Certain Frozen Fish Fillets 

from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam; 2019– 

2020,’’ dated August 31, 2021 (Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum). 

5See Appendix II for a list of companies for 

which we are rescinding this review. 

6See Appendix III for a complete list of 

companies with no shipments during the POR. 

7See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 

FR 65694, 65694–95 (October 24, 2011) and the 

‘‘Assessment Rates’’ section, below. 

8See Appendix IV for a complete list of 

companies not eligible for a separate rate. 

9See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement 

of Change in Department Practice for Respondent 

Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and 

Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy 

Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 

FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). 

Joint Stock Company (ESS), an exporter 

of fish fillets from Vietnam. We also 

preliminarily determine that one 

additional company, Green Farms 

Seafood Joint Stock Company (Green 

Farms), is eligible for separate rate 

status, 32 companies did not establish 

eligibility for a separate rate and are part 

of the Vietnam-wide entity, and 15 

companies had no shipments during the 

POR. Finally, we are rescinding this 

review with respect to 13 companies. 

We invite interested parties to comment 

on these preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable September 10, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Javier Barrientos or Christopher 

Maciuba, AD/CVD Operations, Office V, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2243 

and 202–482–0413, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On October 6, 2020, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register the 

notice of initiation of an administrative 

review of the antidumping duty (AD) 

order on fish fillets from Vietnam with 

respect to 63 companies.1 On January 8, 

2021, we selected the two largest 

exporters, ESS and NTSF, as mandatory 

respondents.2 On April 5, 2021, 

Commerce extended the deadline for 

these preliminary results by 120 days, to 

August 31, 2021.3

For a complete description of the 

events that followed the initiation of 

this review, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum.4 A list of topics 

included in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum is included as an 

Appendix to this notice. The 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/ 

frn/. 

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by this order 

are fish fillets from Vietnam. For a full 

description of the scope of the order, see 

the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

Partial Rescission of Administrative 

Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), 

Commerce will rescind an 

administrative review, in whole or in 

part, if the party that requested a review 

withdraws the request within 90 days of 

the date of publication of the notice of 

initiation. As noted above, all interested 

parties timely withdrew their requests 

for review for 13 companies. 

Accordingly, Commerce is rescinding 

this review with respect to these 13 

entities, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(1).5 The review will 

continue with respect to the other firms 

for which a review was requested and 

initiated. 

Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments 

Based on an analysis of information 

from U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) and the letters filed by 

15 companies certifying no shipments, 

Commerce preliminarily determines 

that these companies had no shipments 

during the POR.6 For additional 

information regarding this finding, see 

the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

Consistent with our assessment 

practice in non-market economy (NME) 

administrative reviews, Commerce is 

not rescinding this review for these 15 

companies, but intends to complete the 

review and issue appropriate 

instructions to CBP based on the final 

results of the review.7

Separate Rates 

Commerce preliminarily determines 

that information placed on the record by 

mandatory respondents ESS and NTSF, 

and the separate rate applicant Green 

Farms, demonstrates that these 

companies are entitled to separate rate 

status. The remaining 32 companies 

subject to this review have not 

established eligibility for a separate rate 

and are, therefore, considered to be part 

of the Vietnam-wide entity for these 

preliminary results.8 For additional 

information, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. 

Vietnam-Wide Entity 

The Vietnam-wide entity will not be 

under review unless a party specifically 

requests, or Commerce self-initiates, a 

review of the entity. Because no party 

requested a review of the Vietnam-wide 

entity, the entity is not under review, 

and the entity’s rate is not subject to 

change.9

Other than the companies discussed 

above—i.e., those that received separate 

rate status, those with no shipments 

during the POR, or those for which this 

review has been rescinded—Commerce 

considers all other companies under 

review to be part of the Vietnam-wide 

entity. For additional information, see 

the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with sections 751(a)(1)(B) 

and 751(a)(2) of the Act. We have 

calculated constructed export price in 

accordance with section 772 of the Act. 

Because Vietnam is an NME country 

within the meaning of section 771(18) of 

the Act, we have calculated NV in 

accordance with section 773(c) of the 

Act. For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 

conclusions, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. 

Use of Adverse Facts Available 

Pursuant to sections 776(a) and (b) of 

the Act, Commerce has preliminarily 

assigned ESS a dumping margin of 

$3.87/kg based on AFA. ESS ceased 

participating in this review and did not 

provide information requested by 

Commerce; accordingly, we find that 

necessary information is not available 

on the record, ESS failed to provide the 

requested information in the form and 

manner requested and significantly 

impeded the proceeding, pursuant to 

section 776(a) of the Act. Additionally, 

we find that ESS had the necessary 

information in its possession and 

elected not to submit the information 

and, thus, ESS did not act to the best of 

its ability in responding to Commerce’s 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
50700 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 173 / Friday, September 10, 2021 / Notices 

10This rate is based on an average of the rates 

assigned to ESS and NTSF, pursuant to section 

735(c)(5)(B) of the Act. 

11See 19 CFR 351.309; see also 19 CFR 351.303 

(for general filing requirements). 

12See 19 CFR 351.303. 

13See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD 

Service Requirements Due to COVID–19, 85 FR 

41363 (July 10, 2021). 

14See 19 CFR 351.212(b). 

15See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). 

information request by the applicable 

deadline, pursuant to section 776(b) of 

the Act. For further information, see 

‘‘Application of Facts Available and Use 

of Adverse Inferences’’ in the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

Preliminary Results of Review 

Commerce preliminarily determines 

that the following weighted-average 

dumping margins exist for the period 

August 1, 2019, through July 31, 2020: 

Exporter/producer 

Weightedaverage 

dumping margin 

(dollars per 

kilogram) 

NTSF Seafoods Joint Stock 

Company ................................. $0.00/kg 

East Sea Seafoods Joint Stock 

Company ................................. * $3.87/kg 

Review-Specific Rate Applicable 

to the Following Company: 10

Green Farms Seafood Joint 

Stock Company ....................... 1.94/kg 

* This rate was determined wholly under section 

776(d) of the Act. 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

Commerce intends to disclose to 

interested parties the calculations 

performed in connection with these 

preliminary results within five days of 

the date of publication of this notice, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Case briefs or other written comments 

may be submitted to the Assistant 

Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance no later than 30 days after 

the date of publication of these 

preliminary results, unless the Secretary 

alters the time limit. Rebuttal briefs, 

limited to issues raised in case briefs, 

may be submitted no later than seven 

days after the deadline for case briefs.11

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and 

(d)(2), parties who submit case briefs or 

rebuttal briefs in this review are 

encouraged to submit with each 

argument: (1) A statement of the issue; 

(2) a brief summary of the argument; 

and (3) a table of authorities. Case and 

rebuttal briefs should be filed using 

ACCESS.12 Note that Commerce has 

temporarily modified certain of its 

requirements for serving documents 

containing business proprietary 

information, until further notice.13

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing, limited to issues raised in the 

case and rebuttal briefs, must submit a 

request to the Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. 

Department of Commerce, within 30 

days after the date of publication of this 

notice. Requests should contain the 

party’s name, address, and telephone 

number, the number of participants, 

whether any participant is a foreign 

national, and a list of the issues to be 

discussed. If a request for a hearing is 

made, Commerce will announce the 

date and time of the hearing. Parties 

should confirm by telephone the date 

and time of the hearing two days before 

the scheduled date. 

Unless otherwise extended, 

Commerce intends to issue the final 

results of this administrative review, 

which will include the results of our 

analysis of all issues raised in the case 

briefs, within 120 days of publication of 

these preliminary results in the Federal 

Register, pursuant to section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. 

Assessment Rates 

Upon completion of this 

administrative review, Commerce will 

determine, and CBP shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries.14

If NTSF’s weighted-average dumping 

margin is not zero or de minimis (i.e., 

less than 0.50 percent) in the final 

results of this review, Commerce will 

calculate importer-specific (or customerspecific) assessment rates for NTSF, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

Specifically, Commerce intends to 

calculate an importer-specific (or 

customer-specific) per-unit assessment 

rate by dividing the amount of dumping 

for reviewed sales to the importer or 

customer by the total sales quantity 

associated with those transactions. 

Where either NTSF’s weighted-average 

dumping margin is zero or de minimis, 

or an importer-specific or customerspecific ad valorem assessment rate is 

zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP 

to liquidate appropriate entries without 

regard to antidumping duties.15 For any 

NTSF entries that were not reported in 

the U.S. sales databases submitted by 

NTSF, Commerce will instruct CBP to 

liquidate such entries at the Vietnamwide rate. 

If Commerce continues to determine 

ESS’s margin on the basis of AFA in the 

final results of this review, Commerce 

will instruct, and CBP shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries of subject merchandise at the 

rate of $3.87 per kilogram. 

For any respondent that was not 

selected for individual examination in 

this administrative review, but which 

qualified for a separate rate, i.e., Green 

Farms, we will instruct, and CBP shall 

assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise at the rate of $1.94 per 

kilogram. 

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

review for shipments of the subject 

merchandise entered, or withdrawn 

from warehouse, for consumption on or 

after the publication date, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

For the companies listed above that 

have a separate rate, the cash deposit 

rate will be equal to the weightedaverage dumping margin established in 

the final results of this review (except, 

if the rate is de minimis, then cash 

deposit rate will be zero); (2) for 

previously-examined Vietnamese and 

non-Vietnamese exporters not listed 

above that at the time of entry are 

eligible for a separate rate based on a 

prior completed segment of this 

proceeding, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the existing exporterspecific cash deposit rate; (3) for all 

Vietnamese exporters of subject 

merchandise that have not been found 

to be entitled to a separate rate at the 

time of entry, the cash deposit rate will 

be that for the Vietnam-wide entity (i.e., 

$2.39 per kilogram); and (4) for all nonVietnamese exporters of subject 

merchandise which at the time of entry 

are not eligible for a separate rate, the 

cash deposit rate will be the rate 

applicable to the Vietnamese exporter 

that supplied that non-Vietnamese 

exporter. These deposit requirements, 

when imposed, shall remain in effect 

until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during the POR. 

Failure to comply with this requirement 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 173 / Friday, September 10, 2021 / Notices 50701 

16The Vinh Hoan Corporation is a single entity 

that also includes Van Duc Food Export Joint Stock 

Company and Van Duc Tien Giang Food Export 

Company. 

17Hung Vuong Group is a single entity comprised 

of the following individual companies: (1) An Giang 

Fisheries Import and Export Joint Stock Company; 

(2)Asia Pangasius Company Limited; (3) Hung 

Vuong Ben Tre Seafood Processing Company 

Limited; (4) Europe Joint Stock Company; (5) Hung 

Vuong-Sa Dec Co., Ltd.; (6) Hung Vuong-Vinh Long 

Co. Ltd.; (7) Hung Vuong Corporation; and (8) Hung 

Vuong Mascato Company Limited. 

18QVD is a single entity that also includes QVD 

Dong Thap Food Co., Ltd. and Thuan Hung Co., 

Ltd. 

could result in Commerce’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing the 

preliminary results of this review in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213. 

Dated: August 31, 2021. 

James Maeder, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

Appendix I—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Standing 

V. Partial Rescission of Review 

VI. Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments 

VII. Application of Facts Available and 

Adverse Inferences 

VIII. Discussion of the Methodology 

IX. Recommendation 

Appendix II—Companies for Which We 

Are Rescinding the Review 

1. Ben Tre Aquaproduct Import and Export 

Joint Stock Company (aka Bentre 

Aquaproduct) 

2. Bien Dong Hau Giang Seafood Joint Stock 

Company (aka Bien Dong HG or Bien 

Dong Hau Giang Seafood Joint Stock Co.) 

3. Bien Dong Seafood Company Ltd. (aka 

Bien Dong, Bien Dong Seafood, Bien 

Dong Seafood Co., Ltd., Biendong 

Seafood Co., Ltd., or Bien Dong Seafood 

Limited Liability Company) 

4. Fatifish Company Limited (aka FATIFISH 

or FATIFISHCO) 

5. GODACO Seafood Joint Stock Company 

(aka GODACO, GODACO Seafood, 

GODACO_SEAFOOD, or GODACO 

Seafood J.S.C.) 

6. Golden Quality Seafood Corporation (aka 

Golden Quality, GoldenQuality, or 

GoldenQuality Seafood Corporation) 

7. Hung Vuong-Mien Tay Aquaculture 

Corporation (aka HVMT or Hung Vuong 

Mien Tay Aquaculture Joint Stock 

Company) 

8. Hung Vuong Seafood Joint Stock Company 

9. International Development & Investment 

Corporation (aka IDI or International 

Development and Investment 

Corporation) 

10. Nha Trang Seafoods, Inc. (aka Nha Trang 

Seafoods, Nha Trang Seafoods-F89, or 

Nha Trang Seaproduct Company) 

11. Seavina Joint Stock Company (aka 

Seavina) 

12. Thanh Binh Dong Thap One Member 

Company Limited (aka Thanh Binh Dong 

Thap or Thanh Binh Dong Thap Ltd.) 

13. Vinh Hoan Corporation (aka Vinh Hoan, 

Vinh Hoan Co., or Vinh Hoan Corp.) 16

Appendix III—Companies With No 

Shipments During the POR 

1. Ben Tre Forestry and Aquaproduct ImportExport Joint Stock Company (aka 

Faquimex, or Ben Tre) 

2. C.P. Vietnam Corporation 

3. Cafatex Corporation (aka Cafatex) 

4. Cantho Import-Export Seafood Joint Stock 

Company (aka CASEAMEX, Cantho 

Import Export Seafood Joint Stock 

Company, Cantho Import-Export Joint 

Stock Company, Can Tho Import Export 

Seafood Joint Stock Company, Can Tho 

Import-Export Seafood Joint Stock 

Company, or Can Tho Import-Export 

Joint Stock Company) 

5. Colorado Boxed Beef Company (aka CBBC) 

6. Dai Thanh Seafoods Company Limited 

(aka DATHACO) 

7. The Great Fish Company LLC 

8. Hai Huong Seafood Joint Stock Company 

(aka HHFish, HH Fish, or Hai Huong 

Seafood) 

9. Hung Vuong Group 17

10. Nam Viet Corporation (aka NAVICO) 

11. PREFCO Distribution LLC 

12. QMC Foods, Inc. 

13. Riptide Foods 

14. QVD Food Company Ltd. (aka QVD, QVD 

Food Co., Ltd., or QVD Aquaculture) 18

15. Vinh Quang Fisheries Corporation (aka 

Vinh Quang, Vinh Quang Fisheries 

Corp., Vinh Quang Fisheries Joint Stock 

Company, or Vinh Quang Fisheries Co., 

Ltd.) 

Appendix IV—Companies Not Eligible 

for a Separate Rate 

1. Anchor Seafood Corp. 

2. An Phat Import-Export Seafood Co., Ltd. 

(aka An Phat Seafood Co. Ltd. or An Phat 

Seafood Co., Ltd.) 

3. Anvifish Joint Stock Company (aka 

Anvifish, Anvifish JSC, or Anvifish Co., 

Ltd.) 

4. Basa Joint Stock Company (aka BASACO) 

5. Binh Dinh Import Export Company (aka 

Binh Dinh) 

6. Cadovimex II Seafood Import-Export and 

Processing Joint Stock Company (aka 

Cadovimex II) 

7. Can Tho Animal Fishery Products 

Processing Export Enterprise 

8. Cuu Long Fish Import-Export Corporation 

(aka CL Panga Fish) 

9. Cuu Long Fish Joint Stock Company (aka 

CL-Fish, CL–FISH CORP, or Cuu Long 

Fish Joint Stock Company) 

10. GF Seafood Corp. 

11. Go Dang An Hiep One Member Limited 

Company 

12. Go Dang Ben Tre One Member Limited 

Liability Company 

13. Hoa Phat Seafood Import-Export and 

Processing J.S.C. (aka HOPAFISH, Hoa 

Phat Seafood Import-Export and 

Processing Joint Stock Company, Hoa 

Phat Seafood Import-Export and 

Processing JSC) 

14. Hoang Long Seafood Processing Company 

Limited (aka HLS) 

15. Indian Ocean One Member Company 

Limited (aka Indian Ocean Co., Ltd.) 

16. Lian Heng Investment Co., Ltd. (aka Lian 

Heng or Lian Heng Investment) 

17. Lian Heng Trading Co., Ltd. (aka Lian 

Heng or Lian Heng Trading) 

18. Nam Phuong Seafood Co., Ltd. (aka Nam 

Phuong, or NAFISHCO) 

19. New Food Import, Inc. 

20. NTACO Corporation (aka NTACO) 

21. Seafood Joint Stock Company No. 4 (aka 

SEAPRIEXCO No. 4) 

22. Seafood Joint Stock Company No. 4 

Branch Dongtam Fisheries Processing 

Company (aka DOTASEAFOODCO or 

Seafood Joint Stock Company No. 4— 

Branch Dong Tam Fisheries Processing 

Company) 

23. Southern Fishery Industries Company, 

Ltd. (aka South Vina) 

24. Thanh Hung Co., Ltd. (aka Thanh Hung 

Frozen Seafood Processing Import Export 

Co., Ltd.) 

25. Thien Ma Seafood Co., Ltd (aka 

THIMACO) 

26. Thuan An Production Trading and 

Service Co., Ltd. (aka TAFISHCO) 

27. To Chau Joint Stock Company (aka 

TOCHAU, TOCHAU JSC, or TOCHAU 

Joint Stock Company) 

28. Viet Hai Seafood Company Limited (aka 

Viet Hai) 

29. Viet Phu Foods and Fish Corporation (aka 

Vietphu) 

30. Viet Phu Foods & Fish Co., Ltd. 

31. Vietnam Seaproducts Joint Stock 

Company (aka Seaprodex or Vietnam 

Seafood Corporation—Joint Stock 

Company) 

32. Vinh Long Import-Export Company (aka 

Vinh Long) 

[FR Doc. 2021–19519 Filed 9–9–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–570–017] 

Certain Passenger Vehicle and Light 

Truck Tires From the People’s 

Republic of China: Preliminary Results 

of Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Review Rescission in Part, and Intent 

To Rescind in Part; 2019 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily determines 

that countervailable subsidies are being 

provided to producers/exporters of 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES