alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2



SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION



I, Alvin D. Kang, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Broadway Financial Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(c) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers first fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over
financial reporting; and



5. The small business issuers
other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



|                              
|------------------------------
|Date: May 13, 2004            
|                              
|/s/ Alvin D. Kang             
|Signature                     
|                              
|Alvin D. Kang                 
|Chief Financial Officer       
|Broadway Financial Corporation
#### The Norwich Land Company *v.*Public Utilities Commission of the State of Connecticut et al.

*Juri E. Taalman,*in support of the motion.

Submitted May 6

decided May 13, 1975

The motion by the defendant Cable Video, Inc., to expedite the appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Hartford County is denied.
**Exhibit      32.2 -**
**Certification      of Principal Financial Officer**

**CERTIFICATION      IN ACCORDANCE WITH**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED BY**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                Jennifer S. LeBlanc               |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Jennifer                S. LeBlanc                   |
|   | Chief                Financial Officer and Secretary |
|   | Date:                November 09, 2006               |
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph Green, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Clemente, J.), rendered March 12, 1982, as amended May 3, 1984, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment, as amended, is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mangano, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.
[Cite as State ex rel. Adkins v. Dinovo , 2015-Ohio-473.]

COURT OF APPEALS DELAWARE COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

STATE OF OHIO, ex rel. TRISTEN ADKINS

Relator

-vsCINDY DINOVO, CLERK OF COURTS Respondent

JUDGES: Hon. William B. Hoffman, P. J. Hon. Sheila G. Farmer, J. Hon. John W. Wise, J. Case No. 14 CAD 08 0052

O P I N I O N

CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Peti tion for Writ of Mandamus

JUDGMENT: Dismissed

DATE OF JUDGMENT ENTRY: February 6, 2015

APPEARANCES: For Relator For Respondent

SAMUEL H. SHAMANSKY DARREN M. SHULMAN DONALD L. REGENSBURGER ATTORNEY FOR CITY OF DELAWARE COLIN E. PETERS 1 South Sandusky Street 523 South Third Street Delaware, Ohio 43015 Columbus, Ohio 43215Wise, J. {¶1}. Relator, Tristen Adkins, was charged with several felonies in the Delaware Municipal Court. The judge in that court set bond in the amount of $50,000.00 which was able to be met by posting ten percent or cash or surety. On August 25, 2014, Relator’s parents took $5,085.00 to the clerk of courts which represented ten percent of the $50,000.00 bond. The clerk, however, refused to accept the deposit. According to Relator, the clerk refused to accept the money because Relator’s parents did not satisfy additional financial requirements for the remaining $45,000.00. {¶2}. Relator has filed a Petition for Writ of Mandamus requesting this Court order Respondent to accept the deposit offered by Relator’s parents. Respondent has filed a motion to dismiss arguing the petition is now moot. {¶3}. On August 29, 2014, Relator was indicted by the grand jury. On that same date, the State moved to dismiss the municipal court case because the jurisdiction of the common pleas court was invo ked by the filing of the indictment. The Delaware Municipal Court case was dismissed on August 29, 2014. {¶4}. Because the municipal case was dismissed after the instant petition was filed, this case has become moot. “[A] writ [of mandamus] will not lie in order to secure a determination of issues which have become moot pending consideration by the court of appeals. State, ex rel. Hawke v. Weygandt (1947), 148 Ohio St. 453, 456, 75 N.E.2d 691 [36 O.O. 88]. See, also, State, ex rel. Warner & Swasey Co., v. Indus. Comm. (1977), 50 Ohio St.2d 152, 363 N.E.2d 736 [4 O.O.3d 346].” State ex rel. Gantt v.

Coleman , 6 Ohio St. 3d 5, 5, 450 N.E.2d 1163, 1164 (1983).{¶5}. Respondent no longer has the ability to accept the offered deposit because a pending case does not exist in Respondent’s court. We further note Relator has posted bond in the common pleas court case also making this petition moot. For these reasons, the motion to dismiss the petition as moot is granted.

By: Wise, J. Hoffman, P. J., and Farmer, J., concur.

JWW/ 0121
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Damon McCoy, Appellant.

Submitted May 21, 2007;

decided June 5, 2007

*997Motion for an extension of the time within which to apply for permission to appeal pursuant to CPL 460.20 granted and motion papers treated as a timely CPL 460.20 application.
#### David Rivera CRUZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-76155.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 16, 2007 *.

Filed April 20, 2007.

David Rivera Cruz, Goleta, CA, pro se.

*768CAC-Distriet Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, David V. Bernal, Attorney, Cindy S. Ferrier, Esq., Jennifer Keeney, Esq., DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Jeffery R. Leist, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CLIFTON and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

David Rivera Cruz seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals upholding an immigration judge’s (“U”) order denying his application for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the IJ’s discretionary determination that Rivera Cruz failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying relative. *See Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft,*327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Chapter 35, Appendix 2 – 35A2


EXHIBIT 10.2 

Field Point Capital Management Company

One Landmark Square, Suite 1905

Stamford, CT 06901 

 

 

June 11, 2021

PASSUR Aerospace, Inc.

One Landmark Square, Suite 1905

Stamford, CT 06901 

 

As Chairman of the Board as well as the principal shareholder of PASSUR Aerospace, Inc. (“PASSUR Aerospace” or the “Company”), I make the following commitment to the Company with respect to the period from the date of this commitment through June 12, 2022.

 

Liquidity

 

I commit that if the Company at any time is unable to meet its obligations through June 12, 2022, that I will provide the necessary continuing financial support to the Company to ensure the Company’s ability to operate as a going concern through the period ending June 12, 2022. Such continuing support may take the form of additional loans or advances to PASSUR Aerospace in addition to the deferral of principal and/or interest payments due on outstanding loans to PASSUR Aerospace as referred to above.

 

These commitments are not conditional and are irrevocable through the period ending June 12, 2022.

 

I, G.S. Beckwith Gilbert, having the financial wherewithal to enter into this irrevocable commitment, make the above commitments to the Company and its shareholders.

 

 

/s/ G.S. Beckwith Gilbert        .                               

G.S. Beckwith Gilbert

President
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

DANIEL J. SCHLESINGER, 

Plaintiff, No. 6:15-cv-02241-HZ

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, ORDER

Defendant.

Plaintiff Daniel Schlesinger brought this action seeking review of the Commissioner's

final decision to deny disability insurance benefits (DIB). In April 2016, the parties agreed that

the case should be remanded for further administrative proceedings. An Order of Remand and

Judgment were filed on April 28, 2016. ECF 10. Upon remand, Plaintiff was determined to be

disabled and was awarded benefits beginning in September 2012. 

Plaintiff now seeks an award of fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Defendant has no

objection to the request. I have reviewed the record in the case, the motion, and the supporting

materials including the award of benefits, the fee agreement with counsel, and the recitation of

1 - ORDER
counsel's hours and services. Applying the standards set by Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789,

796 (2002), I find the requested fees reasonable.

I grant the motion [#13] and award Plaintiff's counsel $7,500.00 in attorney's fees under

42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Previously, I awarded Plaintiff attorney's fees in the amount of $1,479.50

under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. ECF 12. When issuing the

section 406(b) check for payment to Plaintiff’s attorney, the Commissioner is directed to subtract

the amount previously awarded under EAJA and send Plaintiff’s attorney the balance of

$6,020.50, less any applicable processing fees as allowed by statute. Any amount withheld after

all administrative and court attorney's fees are paid should be released to the claimant.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated this day of , 2018.

 

Marco A. Hernandez

United States District Judge

2 - ORDER
#### Louise G. Smith *v.*Delavan P. Smith

*John A. Gawrych,*for the appellee (defendant).

*Matthew J. Forstadt,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

Argued June 3

decided June *3,*1975

The defendant’s motion to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in Litchfield County is denied.

The plaintiff’s motion that the trial court be directed to enter judgment sustaining the plaintiff’s demurrer to the defendant’s plea in abatement in the appeal from the Superior Court in Litchfield County is denied.
Updated: 4/23/19

GLEN CANYON DAM ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

TECHNICAL WORK GROUP MEETING

MAY 1, 2019 

https://ucbor-events.webex.com/ucborevents/onstage/g.php?MTID=ef4bf448e484a9410779304d1fb32bd22

Phone: 877-913-4721, Passcode: 3330168

FINAL AGENDA

STARTS AT 8:00 a.m. Phoenix Time

START

TIME

(Duration)

Wednesday, May 1, 2019 

Topic, Presenter, and Purpose

8:00

Phoenix

Time

(1:00) 

Welcome and Administrative: Seth Shanahan, Technical Work Group (TWG) Chair 

 Introductions and Determination of Quorum (16 members)

 Approval of March 14, 2019, Meeting Minutes

 Review 2019 Meeting Dates: June 11-12 (in-person) and October 21-22 (in-person)

 Ad Hoc Group Updates

 Wiki Update

 Action Item Tracking Form Update

 Update on Federal Funding

 Update on the Expanded Non-native Aquatic Species Management Plan

 Update on Monitoring and Research Trips to Occur from Today until Next Meeting

 Updates on Items of Interest that are in Consideration for Implementation before Next TWG

Meeting

9:00

(:15)

Update on Hydrology, Operations, and Reservoir/Release Temperatures: Heather Patno, Bureau 

of Reclamation

 Presentation (10 minutes)

 Q&A and discussion (5 minutes)

9:15

(:15) 

Bug Flows Update: Ted Kennedy and Jeff Muehlbauer, GCMRC

 Presentation (10 minutes)

 Q&A and discussion (5 minutes)

9:30

(1:00) 

Update from the Budget Ad Hoc Group: Shane Capron, Western Area Power Administration

 Presentation, Q&A and discussion (1 hour)

10:30

(:15) BREAK

10:45

(1:00)

Consideration of FY20 Budget and Work Plan Adjustments: TWG Members

 Presentation, Q&A and discussion (1 hour)

11:45

(:10) 

Discussion of Emerging Issues and Request for Agenda Items for Next Meeting: Seth Shanahan, 

TWG Chair

 Discussion (10 minutes)

11:55

(:05) 

Public Comment

12:00 ADJOURN
# L_2009188EN.01012701.xml

| 18.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 188/127 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 188/127

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (EC) No 444/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 May 2009 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2252/2004 on standards for security features and biometrics in passports and travel documents issued by Member States

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 142 of 6 June 2009
  )

On the cover and on page 1, the title should read as follows:

for:

‘Regulation (EC) No 444/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 May 2009 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2252/2004 on standards for security features and biometrics in passports and travel documents issued by Member States’,

read:

‘Regulation (EC) No 444/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2252/2004 on standards for security features and biometrics in passports and travel documents issued by Member States’.

---
CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's best knowledge and belief, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
Geodyne Energy Income Limited Partnership II-G ("Issuer") for the period ending
December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 25th day of March, 2003.

                                   GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                   PARTNERSHIP II-G
                                   ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001000779
<NAME>                        CONSOLIDATED DELIVERY & LOGISTICS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     DOLLARS
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                               2,504
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       22,752
<ALLOWANCES>                                        (1,414) 
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    26,960
<PP&E>                                              12,032
<DEPRECIATION>                                      (7,858)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      35,382
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               19,969
<BONDS>                                              2,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 7
<OTHER-SE>                                           9,911
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        35,382
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   126,791
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       88,007
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    35,909
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       801
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     597
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      1,731
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1,731
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  1,731
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         1,004
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .15
        


</TABLE>
NO. 07-12-0242-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

JANUARY 3, 2013

______________________________

MARIO SOCCORRO MARTINEZ, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 47TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 63,883-A; HONORABLE DAN SCHAAP, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

ABATEMENT AND REMAND

Following a plea of not guilty, Appellant, Mario Soccorro Martinez, was convicted 

by a jury of possession of a controlled substance, enhanced, and sentenced to nine 

years confinement. When the clerk’s record was filed, it came to this Court’s attention 

that it did not contain a Trial Court’s Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal as 

required by Rule 25.2(a)(2) and (d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. By 

letter dated October 29, 2012, the trial court and trial court clerk were notified of the 
2

defect and given thirty days to correct the deficiency. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1. 

Following expiration of the deadline, on December 20, 2012, the Clerk of this Court 

inquired of the trial court clerk whether a certification had been filed. The trial court 

clerk advised that the certification remained outstanding.

Consequently, we now abate this appeal and remand this cause to the trial court 

for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever means 

necessary to secure a proper Trial Court's Certification of Defendant's Right of Appeal 

in compliance with Rule 25.2(d). Once properly completed and executed, the 

certification shall be filed and included in a supplemental clerk's record. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 34.5(a)(12). The trial court shall cause the supplemental clerk's record to be 

filed with the Clerk of this Court within 30 days of the date of this order. If a 

supplemental clerk's record containing a proper certification is not filed in accordance 

with this order, this cause will be referred to this Court for further action. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 25.2(d). 

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.