alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 172 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 172

  To designate the United States courthouse located at 501 East Court 
 Street in Jackson, Mississippi, as the ``R. Jess Brown United States 
                             Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 2015

 Mr. Thompson of Mississippi introduced the following bill; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To designate the United States courthouse located at 501 East Court 
 Street in Jackson, Mississippi, as the ``R. Jess Brown United States 
                             Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 501 East Court Street in 
Jackson, Mississippi, shall be known and designated as the ``R. Jess 
Brown United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``R. Jess Brown 
United States Courthouse''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INTERIM
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND BALANCE SHEET AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q COMMUNICATIONS & POWER
INDUSTRIES, INC FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JANUARY 1, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001000564
<NAME> COMMUNICATIONS & POWER INDUSTRIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-01-1999
<CASH>                                           1,482
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,632
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     57,400
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               109,057
<PP&E>                                          78,027
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 232,339
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           70,616
<BONDS>                                        124,723
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           21,527
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,472
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   232,339
<SALES>                                         57,781
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                57,781
<CGS>                                           43,654
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   43,654
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,066
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,406
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,005)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (422)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (583)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (583)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

CASE No. DA 24-0316

IN RE THE PARENTING OF T.R.L., 

a minor child,

CASSIE NEZ PERCE,

Appellant/Petitioner,

v.

BOB A. LUHMAN,

Appellee/Respondent.

ORDER

Pursuant to Appellee’s motion for extension to file the response 

brief, and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. Appellee

has until September 30, 2024, to file his response brief. 

No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 22 2024

08/22/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0316
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Jimmy Wayne Lewis, Jr.

, * From the 3 50th District Court

of Taylor County

Trial Court No. 11793

- D

.

Vs. No. 11

- 16

- 00227

- CR * August 23 , 2018

The Sta te of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey

, J.

(Panel consists of: Willson, J.,

Bailey, J. , and Wright, S.C.J.,

s itting by assignment )

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
# L_2009104EN.01005801.xml

| 24.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 104/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 104/58

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 29/2009 of 16 January 2009 laying down requirements on data link services for the single European sky

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 13 of 17 January 2009
  )

| 1. | On page 11, Annex I, Part A, first paragraph: |
| --- | --- |

1.

On page 11, Annex I, Part A, first paragraph:

for:

‘... Article 1(3)(a) ...’,

read:

‘... the first paragraph of Article 1(3) ...’;

| 2. | on page 11, Annex I, Part B, first paragraph: |
| --- | --- |

2.

on page 11, Annex I, Part B, first paragraph:

for:

‘... Article 1(3)(b) ...’,

read:

‘... the second paragraph of Article 1(3) ...’.

---
<PAGE>   1
                                  Exhibit 23.1



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed on or about
November 15, 1999 of Security Financial Corp, of our report dated January 22,
1999, related to the consolidated balance sheet of Security Financial Corp. as
of December 31, 1998 and the related consolidated statements of income, changes
in stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 1998,
which report is incorporated by reference in this Form 10-KSB.

                                                   /s/S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.
                                                   S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.


Wexford, PA
March 29, 2000
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             433
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,927
<ALLOWANCES>                                       770
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,077
<PP&E>                                             187
<DEPRECIATION>                                      25
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,639
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,322
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            37
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,639
<SALES>                                          6,922
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,922
<CGS>                                            4,694
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,694
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,819
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 252
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    227
<INCOME-TAX>                                        91
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                136
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       136
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Caremark Rx, Inc. (the Corporation) for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation,
certifies that:



(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Corporation.



Date: August 9, 2004



|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    HOWARD A.
MCLURE                                              
|Howard A. McLure Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE JUNE 30,
1997 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             337
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      725
<ALLOWANCES>                                       109
<INVENTORY>                                         95
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,216
<PP&E>                                           5,289
<DEPRECIATION>                                     777
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,463
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,384
<BONDS>                                          3,028
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,903
<OTHER-SE>                                         443
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,463
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,215
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,963
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    18
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    26
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 110
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    507
<INCOME-TAX>                                       213
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                279
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       279
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.37
        

</TABLE>
#### Maureen Caiazzo, Respondent, v Jacqueline A. Crespi, Appellant.

The plaintiff was involved in an automobile accident on February 1, 1984. She was taken to Nyack Hospital complaining of pain in her neck and X rays were taken which revealed a "normal cervical spine”, a diagnosis of cervical sprain was made, and she was released in two hours. The next day she saw a Dr. Richard J. Kubik who saw her five times in the next two months. Dr. Kubik, in a report dated September 20, 1984, stated that at the plaintiff’s last visit on March 28, 1984, she had a "full range of motion in her neck, [and] occasional discomfort”. Dr. Kubik’s prognosis was as follows: "Patient at present has occasional discomfort and, as with any severe injury to the neck, I would *suspect*that within the future for prolonged periods of time, she will have *occasional*pain in her neck during marked changes in the weather and during periods of so-called stress, as in running, walking, standing, or sitting for prolonged periods of time. I would classify her disability as mild, prolonged” (emphasis supplied).

After her March 28, 1984, visit, the plaintiff ended her medical treatment and stated at an examination before trial on February 6, 1985, that she did not require further treat*624ment for her neck. She also stated that she resumed working within six weeks of the accident, but that she could no longer play "pick-up” games of lacrosse and that she felt pain while swimming and lifting heavy boxes.

The defendant moved for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiff did not suffer a serious injury as defined in Insurance Law §5102 (d). Her motion was supported, *inter alia,*by an affidavit of Dr. Jerome L. Meisel dated May 7, 1985, which stated that he found no objective evidence of injury. Dr. Meisel went on to aver that: "It is my opinion, based on my findings, that the plaintiff sustained a mild or minimal cervical strain and a contusion of her chest wall, both of which injuries, have long since healed.”

The plaintiff opposed the motion with the September 20, 1984, report of Dr. Kubik and a prior report of Dr. Meisel’s dated February 25, 1985, prepared after he examined the plaintiff on February 19, 1985, which stated that she was "subjectively symptomatic from soft tissue injuries to her cervical spine and chest wall”, had minimal residual disability and diagnosed her condition as a "healed cervical strain and contusion, chest wall.”

In light of the unequivocal affidavit of Dr. Meisel and the other unrefuted proof that the plaintiff did not suffer a "serious injury” within any threshold of the Insurance Law, Dr. Kubik’s "suspicion” that the plaintiff may have "occasional” pain in her neck is insufficient to create a triable issue of fact as to "serious injury”. There is no other proof of permanency or significant limitation *(see, Licari v Elliott,*57 NY2d 230; *Mooney v Ovitt,*100 AD2d 702).

Accordingly, the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff had not sustained a "serious injury” as a matter of law, should have been granted. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Fiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.
1 – OPINION AND ORDER 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

PORTLAND DIVISION 

CLEAR SKIES NEVADA, LLC, 

No. 3:15-cv-02142-AC

Plaintiff,

OPINION AND ORDER

v. 

DOE-98.232.166.89, et al., 

Defendants. 

MOSMAN, J., 

On March 10, 2016, Magistrate Judge Acosta issued his Findings and Recommendation 

[21]. On April 27, 2016, Judge Acosta issued an Amended Findings and Recommendation [29] 

only to correct the ECF number for the operative motion. In both, Judge Acosta recommended 

that Plaintiff’s Amended Motion to Sever Doe 6 [16] should be DENIED and Doe 6’s Motion [8] 

should be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. It should be granted as to the motion to sever 

all Defendants except Doe 98.232.166.89. It should be denied as to the motion to quash all 

subpoenas. Does 6’s request for attorney fees should be deferred until the conclusion of the case. 

Plaintiff objected to “the findings and recommendations . . . but not the outcome.” (Pl. Obj. [23] 

at 1.) 

Case 3:15-cv-02142-AC Document 31 Filed 05/06/16 Page 1 of 2
2 – OPINION AND ORDER 

DISCUSSION 

The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may 

file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge, 

but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to 

make a de novo determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or 

recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). However, the court 

is not required to review, de novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of 

the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See 

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 

(9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F&R 

depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject, 

or modify any part of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). 

Upon review, I agree with Judge Acosta’s recommendation and I ADOPT the Amended 

F&R [29] as my own opinion. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this 6th day of May, 2016. 

____________________________ 

MICHAEL W. MOSMAN

Chief United States District Judge 

/s/ Michael W. Mosman

Case 3:15-cv-02142-AC Document 31 Filed 05/06/16 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000826326                    
<NAME>                        Antennas America, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                        1
<CASH>                                            17,555
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    343,197
<ALLOWANCES>                                       6,465
<INVENTORY>                                      300,366
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 676,591
<PP&E>                                           625,212
<DEPRECIATION>                                   220,398
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,480,905
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            832,963
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                          37,686
<OTHER-SE>                                       316,936
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,480,905
<SALES>                                        2,926,728
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,926,728
<CGS>                                          1,922,522
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,301,421
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                83,774
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (377,491)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (132,765)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (244,726)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (244,726)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.00
        


</TABLE>
## 1994 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

12-13-1994 

# N eel y v . C lubM ed

P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : D ock e t 93-2069

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . v i l l a no v a . e du/thir dc ir c uit_1994

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. I t h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 1994 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min
. C a rl s on@l a

w . v i l l a no v a . e du

. 

## R e c omme nde d C it a t ion

" N e e ly v . C lub M e d " (1994). 1994 D e cisio n s . P a pe r 215. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w . v i l l a no v a . e du/thir dc ir c uit_1994/215

## UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_______________ NOS. 93-2069 and 93-2102

_______________ EILEEN ANNE NEELY, Appellant in No. 93-2069

v. CLUB MED MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.; CLUB MED SALES, INC.; CLUB MED, INC., Third-Party Plaintiffs; HOLIDAY VILLAGE (ST. LUCIA), LTD.

v. JOSEPH LEMAIRE, Third-Party Defendant Club Med Management Services, Inc. and Holiday Village (St. Lucia) Inc. Appellants in No. 93-2102

_______________ Present: SLOVITER, Chief Judge , BECKER, STAPLETON, MANSMANN, GREENBERG, HUTCHINSON, SCIRICA, COWEN, NYGAARD, ALITO, ROTH, LEWIS, McKEE and SAROKIN, Circuit Judges
.

O R D E R

A majority of the active judges having voted for rehearing in banc in the above appeal, it is O R D E R E D that the Clerk of this Court vacate the panel's opinion and judgment filed November 15, 1994 and list

## the above case for rehearing in banc at the convenience of the

court. By the Court,
/s/ Dolores K. Sloviter Chief Judge
Dated: December 13, l994