alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COLMENA CORP.
                            Policy On Insider Trading



Dear Employees and Independent Contractors:

     As you know,  Colmena Corp.  ("Colmena") is a "publically  traded" company,
which means its securities  are bought and sold on the  securities  markets that
are regulated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission").
As an employee of or  independent  contractor to Colmena,  you may, from time to
time,  acquire knowledge of significant  corporate  developments  before news of
those developments is available to the investing public. The securities laws and
regulations prohibit those employed by public companies,  and others,  including
relatives, friends and associates of such employees, from buying or selling that
company's securities while in the possession of material,  nonpublic information
about the security,  an activity commonly  referred to as "insider  trading," or
from  sharing such  information  with anyone who is not entitled to receive such
information  in  conjunction  with their  Colmena-related  services,  a practice
commonly  referred to as "tipping." The Commission has treated the detection and
prosecution of insider trading as one of its enforcement  priorities,  and it is
therefore very  important that you are sensitive to the need to treat  material,
nonpublic  information  that you may be privy to as  confidential  in accordance
with Regulation FD, ss. 243.100(b)(2)(ii),  and that you refrain from trading in
Colmena  securities while in possession of such information unless the purchaser
of the  securities  to be sold is  provided  with  the same  specific  material,
nonpublic  information  involved  and has also  agreed to  maintain  the same in
confidentiality in accordance with Regulation FD.

         If you have any questions regarding this issue, in general or about its
application in any particular instance, please feel free to contact me.


                                Very truly yours,


                           /s/ Anthony Q. Joffe /s/
                               Anthony Q. Joffe, President



I acknowledge receipt of, and have read, this Policy on Insider Trading.


-----------------------------------
Employee/Independent Contractor

Print Name: _________________________


Date: _______________


<PAGE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0474

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

BENJAMIN PITKANEN III,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including July 30, 2021, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 23 2021

06/23/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0474
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 23, 2009 

0615 

Order 

 

June 23, 2009 

138442 

DEBORAH PLUTSCHUCK, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 138442 

 COA: 282980 

Macomb CC: 2007-000216-NO 

FRANCIS MANDEL, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 3, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 32.02



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the amended Annual Report of Caraustar Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31,
2003 as submitted for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald J. Domanico, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: January 14, 2005



/s/ Ronald J. DomanicoRonald J. Domanico, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

PAUL “JIM” BIEKER, JR., 3:16-cv-00215-BR

Plaintiffs, JUDGMENT

v.

CITY OF PORTLAND, and PORTLAND

FIRE & RESCUE,

Defendants.

BROWN, Judge

The Court’s Opinion and Order (#15) issued July 14, 2016,

granted Defendants’ Motion (#5) to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint

and gave Plaintiff leave to replead by August 20, 2016, as to

certain claims. Plaintiff has not filed any amended complaint.

IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED THAT this case is DISMISSED without

prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 19th day of September, 2016.

/s/ Anna J. Brown

 

ANNA J. BROWN

United States District Judge

1 - JUDGMENT

Case 3:16-cv-00215-BR Document 17 Filed 09/19/16 Page 1 of 1
#### Mario CARRILLO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tom RIDGE; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 05-55657.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted April 10, 2007 *.

Filed April 19, 2007.

Nora E. Milner, Esq., Milner & Markee, LLP, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Samuel W. Bettwy, Esq., Carol C. Lam, AUSA, USSD—Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: CANBY and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges, and JONES **, District Judge.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

**The Honorable Robert C. Jones, United States District Judge for the District of Nevada, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

Mario Carrillo, a native and citizen of Mexico, appeals the district court’s summary judgment dismissal of his complaint. He sought an order in the nature of mandamus directing the Department of Homeland Security to return his replacement lawful permanent resident card. We affirm.

Carrillo argues that genuine issues of material fact precluded summary judgment, but he has failed to identify a single disputed fact. Furthermore, Carrillo never responded to the government’s motion for summary judgment, the point of which was that Carrillo was not eligible for lawful permanent residence and that his green card had been issued in error. As a matter of due process, Carrillo had the opportunity to show otherwise but never filed a response. Under the circumstances, he has not demonstrated error in the denial of the relief he sought.

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
# L_2010269DE.01002701.xml

| 13.10.2010 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 269/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2010

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 269/27

---

Berichtigung der Richtlinie 2009/65/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 13. Juli 2009 zur Koordinierung der Rechts- und Verwaltungsvorschriften betreffend bestimmte Organismen für gemeinsame Anlagen in Wertpapieren (OGAW)

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 302 vom 17. November 2009
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 302 vom 17. November 2009

Seite 51, Artikel 18 Absatz 4 zweiter Satz:

anstatt:

„Die zuständigen Behörden des Aufnahmemitgliedstaats der Verwaltungsgesellschaft aktualisieren die in der Bescheinigung nach Absatz 2 enthaltenen Informationen und unterrichten die zuständigen Behörden des Aufnahmemitgliedstaats der Verwaltungsgesellschaft über jede Änderung (...).“

muss es heißen:

„Die zuständigen Behörden des Herkunftsmitgliedstaats der Verwaltungsgesellschaft aktualisieren die in der Bescheinigung nach Absatz 2 enthaltenen Informationen und unterrichten die zuständigen Behörden des Aufnahmemitgliedstaats der Verwaltungsgesellschaft über jede Änderung (...).“

---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hilario SALINAS-LOPEZ, a.k.a. Juan Lopez, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-16283

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

July 2, 2007.

A. Fitzgerald Hall, Federal Public Defender, R. Fletcher Peacock, Tampa, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Judy K. Hunt, United States Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before ANDERSON, BLACK and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Alex Fitzgerald Hall, appointed counsel for Hilario Salinas-Lopez in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Salinas-Lopez’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cesar Augusto Enriquez OSORIO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-16214

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

July 2, 2007.

Angela B. Wright, Tampa, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Yvette Rhodes, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

*965Before BLACK, WILSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Angela B. Wright, appointed counsel for Cesar Augusto Enriquez Osorio in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Enriquez Osorio’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
J J ASOND J FMAMJ J ASOND J FMAM

Prior year GCMRC/BOR fiscal reports2GCMRC/BOR report to TWG and AMWGPrior and Present Year UpdatesGCMRC/PA/TWG Updates to AMWGPresent Year +1/+2 detailed budget/workplan2GCMRC/BOR/PA draft budgets/workplans to BAHGGCMRC/BOR/BAHG draft budget/workplan to TWGTWG review and recommendation to AMWGAMWG review and recommendation to DOIPresent Year +2 appropriations budget requestGCMRC/BOR/BAHG prepare draft approps request for TWGTWG review and recommendation to AMWGAMWG review and recommendation to DOIPresent Year +3 to +5 strategic analysisGCMRC/BOR/BAHG prepare draft for TWGTWG review and recommendation to AMWGAMWG review and recommendation to DOIGCMRC/BOR/PA implement Present Year +1 budget

1 Year +1 and Year +2 budget/workplans developed concurrently; review of Year +2 budget when it becomes Year +1 budget limited to criteria d2 Schedules assume AMWG meets in January and July; TWG meets at least quarterly as defined in their operating procedures

Fiscal Year Legend = 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 

GLEN CANYON DAM ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET AND WORKPL

2004 (Prior) 2005 (Present) 2006 (Present 

1 Inputs to budget and workplans are strategic plan, information needs, long-term experimental plan, core monitoring implementation plan, and re

2 Year +1 budget would be developed in greatest detail; Year +2 budget would be less with added detail when it becomes Year +1 budget 3 Schedules assume AMWG meets in January and July; TWG meets at least quarterly as defined in their operating procedures
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7467
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus FLOYD JUNIOR “DICK” POWELL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (CR-99-12) Submitted: November 6, 2003 Decided: November 20, 2003 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Floyd Junior “Dick” Powell, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C.F. Shappert, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Floyd Junior “Dick” Powell appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to stay the sale of forfeited real property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Powell , No. CR-99-12 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 29, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Pliekou Irvin, Appellant.

[945 NYS2d 907]

Appeal from an order of the Ontario County Court (William E Kocher, J.), dated June 7, 2010 pursuant to the 2009 Drug Law Reform Act. The order denied defendant’s application to be resentenced upon defendant’s 2002 conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law and the matter is remitted to Ontario County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: On defendant’s appeal from an order denying his application for resentencing pursuant to the 2009 Drug Law Reform Act *(see*CPL 440.46), the People correctly concede that defendant’s status as a reincarcerated parole violator did not render him ineligible to apply for resentencing *(see People v Paulin,*17 NY3d 238, 242 [2011]; *People v Cobb,*90 AD3d 779 [2011]; *People v Wallace,*87 AD3d 824, 824 [2011]). Although County Court also denied his application on the ground that substantial justice dictated that the application be denied, we conclude that the court erred in making that determination without the benefit of a hearing *(cf. People v Beasley,*47 AD3d 639, 640-641 [2008]; *People v Rivers,*43 AD3d 1247, 1247-1248 [2007], *lv dismissed*9 NY3d 993 [2007]). At the very least, the court should have permitted defendant and his attorney to appear and explain “ ‘why resentencing was warranted’ ” *(People v Morales,*46 AD3d 1395, 1395 [2007], *lv dismissed*10 NY3d 768 [2008]).

We therefore reverse the order and remit the matter to County Court for further proceedings on defendant’s application for resentencing pursuant to CPL 440.46. Present — Scudder, P.J., Centra, Peradotto, Carni and Lindley, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32


Certification of


Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


under Section 906 of the


Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350


In connection with the Annual Report of Carriage Services, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, as amended (the “Report”), Melvin C. Payne, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and L. William Heiligbrodt, Executive Vice President and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:


(1)     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Dated: April 5, 2013


/s/ Melvin C. PayneMelvin C. PayneChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer





/s/ L. William HeiligbrodtL. William HeiligbrodtVice Chairman of the Board, Executive Vice President,Secretary and Director (Principal Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE COMPANY FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BE REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          26,276
<SECURITIES>                                     3,935
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,382
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (411)
<INVENTORY>                                      7,167
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,146
<PP&E>                                           8,113
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,103)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  48,199
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,145
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            17
<OTHER-SE>                                      42,895
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    48,199
<SALES>                                          5,082
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,082
<CGS>                                            3,469
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,469
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,263
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   115
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 114
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,179)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,179)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,179)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.36)
        

</TABLE>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Commodity Utilization Research: New Orleans, LA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area New Orleans, Louisiana Southern Regional Research Center Commodity Utilization Research Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Collaborations The Commodity Utilization Research has a long and productive history of collaborative research involving stakeholders.  Current collaborators and projects:  Sugarcane Processing Waste (Mill Mud) Bioinformatics for Bio-fertilizer Development  Creation of Enhanced-Value Cotton Germplasm via Modulation of Cyclopropyl Fatty Acid Accumulation  Creation of Enhanced-Value Cotton Germplasm via Modulation of Cyclopropyl Fatty Acid Accumulation Role of Bacterial Exopolysaccharide Composition and Structure in Biofilm Formation, Viscosity and Susceptibility to Dextranase Processing Aid  Beyond Static Metabolic Maps - Understanding the Cellular Organization and Dynamics of Lipid Flux for Enhanced Seed Oil Production


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 28, 2018

t0927

Order 

Clerk

September 28, 2018

157655

JEFFREY FLINT,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 157655

COA: 340043 

Genesee CC: 17-321598-DC

JOY SWEETIN,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 27, 2018 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.