51010 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 14, 2021 / Rules and Regulations 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 300 

[EPA–HQ–SFUND–1983–0002, EPA–HQ– 

SFUND–1986–0005, EPA–HQ–SFUND–1987– 

0002, EPA–HQ–SFUND–1989–0011, EPA– 

HQ–SFUND–1990–0010, EPA–HQ–SFUND– 

1990–0011, EPA–HQ–SFUND–1993–0001, 

EPA–HQ–SFUND–2000–0004, EPA–HQ– 

SFUND–2002–0008, EPA–HQ–SFUND–2003– 

0010, EPA–HQ–SFUND–2005–0011, EPA– 

HQ–SFUND–2006–0759, EPA–HQ–SFUND– 

2009–0587, EPA–HQ–SFUND–2011–0076, 

EPA–HQ–SFUND–2011–0077; FRL–8923– 

03–OLEM] 

Deletions From the National Priorities 

List 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) announces the deletion of 

nine sites and the partial deletion of 

eleven sites from the Superfund 

National Priorities List (NPL). The NPL, 

created under the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation, and Liability Act 

(CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, is an 

appendix of the National Oil and 

Hazardous Substances Pollution 

Contingency Plan (NCP). The EPA and 

the states, through their designated state 

agencies, have determined that all 

appropriate response actions under 

CERCLA, other than operation and 

maintenance, monitoring, and five-year 

reviews, where applicable, have been 

completed. However, this deletion does 

not preclude future actions under 

Superfund. 

DATES: Effective on September 14, 2021. 

ADDRESSES:

Docket: EPA has established a docket 

for this action under the Docket 

Identification included in Table 1 in the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of 

this document. All documents in the 

docket are listed on the https://

www.regulations.gov website. Although 

listed in the index, some information is 

not publicly available, i.e., Confidential 

Business Information or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

is not placed on the internet and will be 

publicly available only in hard copy 

form. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either 

electronically through https://

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the corresponding Regional Records 

Centers. Locations, addresses, and 

phone numbers-of the Regional Records 

Centers follow. 

Regional Records Centers: 

• Region 2 (NJ, NY, PR, VI), U.S. EPA, 

290 Broadway, New York, NY 10007– 

1866; 212/637–430842. 

• Region 3 (DE, DC, MD, PA, VA, 

WV), U.S. EPA, Library, 1650 Arch 

Street, Mail code 3SD42, Philadelphia, 

PA 19103; 215/814–3024. 

• Region 4 (AL, FL, GA, KY, MS, NC, 

SC, TN), U.S. EPA, 61 Forsyth Street 

SW, Mail code 9T25, Atlanta, GA 30303; 

404/562–8637. 

• Region 5 (IL, IN, MI, MN, OH, WI), 

U.S. EPA Superfund Division Records 

Manager, Mail code SRC–7J, Metcalfe 

Federal Building, 7th Floor South, 77 

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, IL 

60604; 312/886–4465. 

• Region 7 (IA, KS, MO, NE), U.S. 

EPA, 11201 Renner Blvd., Mail code 

SUPR, Lenexa, KS 66219; 913/551– 

7956. 

• Region 8 (CO, MT, ND, SD, UT, 

WY), U.S. EPA, 1595 Wynkoop Street, 

Mail code Records Center, Denver, CO 

80202–1129; 303/312–7273. 

• Region 10 (AK, ID, OR, WA), U.S. 

EPA, 1200 6th Avenue, Suite 155, Mail 

stop OMP–161, Seattle, WA 98101; 206/ 

553–4494. 

The EPA is temporarily suspending 

Regional Records Centers for public 

visitors to reduce the risk of 

transmitting COVID–19. Information in 

these repositories, including the 

deletion docket, may not be updated 

with hardcopy or electronic media. For 

further information and updates on EPA 

Docket Center services, please visit us 

online at https://www.epa.gov/dockets. 

The EPA continues to carefully and 

continuously monitor information from 

the Centers for Disease Control and 

Prevention (CDC), local area health 

departments, and our Federal partners 

so that we can respond rapidly as 

conditions change regarding COVID. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

• Mabel Garcia, U.S. EPA Region 2 (NJ, 

NY, PR, VI), garcia.mabel@epa.gov, 

212/637–4356 

• Andrew Hass, U.S. EPA Region 3 (DE, 

DC, MD, PA, VA, WV), hass.andrew@

epa.gov, 215/814–2049 

• Leigh Lattimore or Brian Farrier, U.S. 

EPA Region 4 (AL, FL, GA, KY, MS, 

NC, SC, TN), lattimore.leigh@epa.gov 

or farrier.brian@epa.gov, 404/562– 

8768 or 404/562–8952. 

• Karen Cibulskis, U.S. EPA Region 5 

(IL, IN, MI, MN, OH, WI), 

cibulskis.karen@epa.gov, 312/886– 

1843 

• David Wennerstrom, U.S. EPA Region 

7 (IA, KS, MO, NE), 

wennerstrom.david@epa.gov, 913/ 

551–7996 

• Linda Kiefer, U.S. EPA Region 8 (CO, 

MT, ND, SD, UT, WY), kiefer.linda@

epa.gov, 303/312–6689 

• Linda Meyer, U.S. EPA Region 10 

(AK, ID, OR, WA), meyer.linda@

epa.gov, 206/553–6636 

• Chuck Sands, U.S. EPA Headquarters, 

sands.charles@epa.gov, 703/603–8857 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NPL, 

created under section 105 of CERCLA, 

as amended, is an appendix of the NCP. 

The NCP establishes the criteria that 

EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. 

In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425(e), 

sites may be deleted from the NPL 

where no further response is 

appropriate. Partial deletion of sites is 

in accordance with 40 CFR 300.425(e) 

and are consistent with the Notice of 

Policy Change: Partial Deletion of Sites 

Listed on the National Priorities List, 60 

FR 55466, (November 1, 1995). The sites 

to be deleted and partially deleted from 

the NPL are listed in Table 1, including 

docket information containing reference 

documents with the rationale and data 

principally relied upon by the EPA to 

determine that the Superfund response 

is complete. The NCP permits activities 

to occur at a deleted site, or that media 

or parcel of a partially deleted site, 

including operation and maintenance of 

the remedy, monitoring, and five-year 

reviews. These activities for the site are 

entered in Table 1 in this 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section, if 

applicable, under Footnote such that; 

1=site has continued operation and 

maintenance of the remedy, 2=site 

receives continued monitoring, and 

3=site five-year reviews are conducted. 

As described in 40 CFR 300.425(e)(3) of 

the NCP, a site or portion of a site 

deleted from the NPL remains eligible 

for Fund-financed remedial action if 

future conditions warrant such actions. 

TABLE 1 

Site name City/county, state Type Docket No. Footnote 

Reich Farms .............................................. Pleasant Plains, NJ Full ................. EPA–HQ–SFUND–1983–0002 ................. 2, 3 

Butler Mine Tunnel .................................... Pittston, PA ............. Full ................. EPA–HQ–SFUND–1987–0002 ................. ........................

Airco ........................................................... Calvert City, KY ....... Full ................. EPA–HQ–SFUND–2005–0011 ................. 1, 2, 3 


tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 14, 2021 / Rules and Regulations 51011 

TABLE 1—Continued 

Site name City/county, state Type Docket No. Footnote 

Chemfax, Inc .............................................. Gulfport, MS ............ Partial ............. EPA–HQ–SFUND–1993–0001 ................. 1, 2, 3 

Kerr-McGee Chemical Corp-Navassa ....... Navassa, NC ........... Partial ............. EPA–HQ–SFUND–2009–0587 ................. ........................

T.H. Agriculture & Nutrition (Montgomery) Montgomery, AL ...... Partial ............. EPA–HQ–SFUND–1990–0011 ................. 1, 2, 3 

US Finishing/Cone Mills ............................ Greenville, SC ......... Partial ............. EPA–HQ–SFUND–2011–0077 ................. ........................

Arrowhead Refinery Co ............................. Hermantown, MN .... Full ................. EPA–HQ–SFUND–2005–0011 ................. 2, 3 

Barrels, Inc ................................................. Lansing, MI .............. Full ................. EPA–HQ–SFUND–1989–0011 ................. 1, 3 

Bennett Stone Quarry ................................ Bloomington, IN ....... Full ................. EPA–HQ–SFUND–2005–0011 ................. 1, 2, 3 

Lemon Lane Landfill .................................. Bloomington, IN ....... Full ................. EPA–HQ–SFUND–1983–0002 ................. 1, 2, 3 

South Minneapolis Residential Soil Contamination.Minneapolis, MN ..... Partial ............. EPA–HQ–SFUND–2006–0759 ................. ........................

United Scrap Lead Co., Inc ....................... Troy, OH .................. Full ................. EPA–HQ–SFUND–2005–0011 ................. 1, 3 

Neal’s Landfill (Bloomington) ..................... Bloomington, IN ....... Full ................. EPA–HQ–SFUND–1983–0002 ................. 1, 2, 3 

Missouri Electric Works ............................. Cape Girardeau, MO Partial ............. EPA–HQ–SFUND–1990–0010 ................. 1, 3 

Omaha Lead .............................................. Omaha, NE ............. Partial ............. EPA–HQ–SFUND–2003–0010 ................. 1, 3 

Riverfront ................................................... New Haven, MO ...... Partial ............. EPA–HQ–SFUND–2000–0004 ................. 1, 2, 3 

Libby Asbestos .......................................... Libby, MT ................ Partial ............. EPA–HQ–SFUND–2002–0008 ................. 1, 3 

Eagle Mine ................................................. Minturn/Redcliff, CO Partial ............. EPA–HQ–SFUND–1986–0005 ................. 1, 3 

North Ridge Estates .................................. Klamath Falls, OR ... Partial ............. EPA–HQ–SFUND–2011–0076 ................. 1, 3 

Information concerning the sites to be 

deleted and partially deleted from the 

NPL, the proposed rule for the deletion 

and partial deletion of the sites, and 

information on receipt of public 

comment(s) and preparation of a 

Responsiveness Summary (if applicable) 

are included in Table 2 as follows: 

TABLE 2 

Site name 

Date, 

proposed 

rule 

FR citation Public comment Responsiveness 

summary 

Full site deletion (full) or media/ 

parcels/description for partial 

deletion 

Reich Farms .................................... 5/14/2021 86 FR 26452 .. Yes ................... No ..................... Full. 

Butler Mine Tunnel .......................... 5/14/2021 86 FR 26452 .. Yes ................... Yes ................... Full. 

Airco ................................................. 5/14/2021 86 FR 26452 .. No ..................... No ..................... Full. 

Chemfax, Inc ................................... 5/14/2021 86 FR 26452 .. No ..................... No ..................... 11-acres of soils, sediments. 

Kerr-McGee Chemical CorpNavassa.5/14/2021 86 FR 26452 .. No ..................... No ..................... 20.2-acres Operable Unit (OU) 1 

soils. 

T.H. Agriculture & Nutrition (Montgomery).5/14/2021 86 FR 26452 .. No ..................... No ..................... 16.4-acres soils/sediments. 

US Finishing/Cone Mills .................. 5/14/2021 86 FR 26452 .. No ..................... No ..................... 150-acres OU 2 with soils, sediments and surface water. 

Arrowhead Refinery Co ................... 5/14/2021 86 FR 26452 .. No ..................... No ..................... Full. 

Barrels, Inc ...................................... 5/14/2021 86 FR 26452 .. No ..................... No ..................... Full. 

Bennett Stone Quarry ...................... 5/14/2021 86 FR 26452 .. Yes ................... No ..................... Full. 

Lemon Lane Landfill ........................ 5/14/2021 86 FR 26452 .. Yes ................... No ..................... Full. 

South Minneapolis Residential Soil 

Contamination.

5/14/2021 86 FR 26452 .. No ..................... No ..................... Five of remaining nine properties 

on NPL. 

United Scrap Lead Co., Inc ............. 5/14/2021 86 FR 26452 .. No ..................... No ..................... Full. 

Neal’s Landfill (Bloomington) ........... 5/14/2021 86 FR 26452 .. Yes ................... No ..................... Full. 

Missouri Electric Works ................... 5/14/2021 86 FR 26452 .. No ..................... No ..................... 6.4-acre site property OU 1 soils 

and OU 3 sediments. 

Omaha Lead .................................... 5/14/2021 86 FR 26452 .. No ..................... No ..................... 96 residential parcels. 

Riverfront ......................................... 5/14/2021 86 FR 26452 .. No ..................... No ..................... 1.4-acre OU 3 Old City Dump soil, 

groundwater, surface water, 

seeps. 

Libby Asbestos ................................ 5/14/2021 86 FR 26452 .. No ..................... No ..................... OU 8 Roads and Highways (30 

miles of roads and right-of-way). 

Eagle Mine ....................................... 5/14/2021 86 FR 26452 .. Yes ................... Yes ................... 50-acre OU 2 Town of Gilman soils. 

North Ridge Estates ........................ 5/14/2021 86 FR 26452 .. No ..................... No ..................... 125-acre OU 1 includes Northridge 

Estates and former Marine Recuperation Barracks soils. 

For all sites proposed for deletion, the 

closing date for comments in the 

proposed rule was June 14, 2021. The 

EPA received comments on six of the 

sites included for deletion or partial 

deletion in this final rule. The Bennett 

Stone Quarry site and the Lemon Lane 

Landfill site each received one public 

comment supportive of the proposed 

deletion. The Neal’s Landfill 

(Bloomington) site received two public 

comments supportive of the deletion. 

Because no adverse comment was 

received for these three sites, no 

Responsiveness Summaries were 

prepared. 

The Reich Farms site received an 

inquiry concerning the proposed 

deletion action. EPA responded to the 

inquiry by providing information 

available in the deletion docket to the 


tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with RULES1
51012 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 14, 2021 / Rules and Regulations 

commenter. Because the comment was 

not adverse to the proposed deletion of 

the Reich Farms site, EPA did not 

prepare a Responsiveness Summary. 

EPA still believes the deletion action is 

appropriate. EPA placed the comment 

and a memorandum explaining EPA’s 

response to the inquiry in the docket, 

EPA–HQ–SFUND–1983–0002, on 

https://www.regulations.gov, and in the 

Regional repository listed in the 

Addresses section. 

The Butler Mine Tunnel site received 

one written comment and EPA prepared 

a Responsiveness Summary. The 

commentor did not agree with EPA’s 

decision to delete the Butler Mine 

Tunnel Site from the NPL. The 

commentor did express concern that the 

storm drains in their town may be 

connected to boreholes which convey 

stormwater into underground mines. 

The commentor requested an 

investigation of their concerns, 

including the collection of air samples 

and use of camera system. Finally, the 

commentor expressed concern that 

cancer cases in their community are 

located near storm drains. The 

commentor did not specify what 

boreholes or underground mines they 

are concerned about, and did not 

provide their address/location, or the 

name of the town they refer to in their 

comment. The commentor did not offer 

any information specific to the Butler 

Mine Tunnel site to demonstrate that 

NPL deletion criteria were not met. EPA 

has determined that it is appropriate to 

proceed with the deletion because all 

response actions at the site are complete 

and the criteria for deletion have been 

met. A Responsiveness Summary was 

prepared and placed in the docket, 

EPA–HQ–SFUND–1987–0002, on 

https://www.regulations.gov, and in the 

Regional repository listed in the 

ADDRESSES section. 

The Eagle Mine site received one 

comment. The commenter requested 

clarification regarding the purpose of 

the proposed partial deletion of OU2, 

the Town of Gilman, and an explanation 

as to what differentiates the Gilman 

portion of OU2 from other sources of 

contamination at the site. The purpose 

of the proposed deletion is to document 

cleanup completion of the Eagle Mine 

Superfund Site OU2. All response 

requirements in the OU2 Record of 

Decision are implemented and as such, 

OU2 qualifies for partial deletion from 

the NPL. EPA has determined that it is 

appropriate to proceed with the deletion 

because all response actions at the site 

are complete and the criteria for partial 

deletion have been met. A 

Responsiveness Summary was prepared 

and placed in the docket, EPA–HQ– 

SFUND–1986–0005, on https://

www.regulations.gov, and in the 

Regional repository listed in the 

ADDRESSES section. 

For all other sites not specified above, 

no adverse comments were received. 

EPA maintains the NPL as the list of 

sites that appear to present a significant 

risk to public health, welfare, or the 

environment. Deletion from the NPL 

does not preclude further remedial 

action. Whenever there is a significant 

release from a site deleted from the NPL, 

the deleted site may be restored to the 

NPL without application of the hazard 

ranking system. Deletion of a site from 

the NPL does not affect responsible 

party liability in the unlikely event that 

future conditions warrant further 

actions. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Chemicals, Hazardous 

substances, Hazardous waste, 

Intergovernmental relations, Natural 

resources, Oil pollution, Penalties, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Superfund, Water 

pollution control, Water supply. 

Dated: September 2, 2021. 

Larry Douchand, 

Office Director, Office of Superfund 

Remediation and Technology Innovation. 

For reasons set out in the preamble, 

the EPA amends 40 CFR part 300 as 

follows: 

PART 300—NATIONAL OIL AND 

HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES 

POLLUTION CONTINGENCY PLAN 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 300 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. 

9601–9657; E.O. 13626, 77 FR 56749, 3 CFR, 

2013 Comp., p. 306; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757, 

3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52 

FR 2923, 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 193. 

■ 2. In appendix B to part 300 amend 

Table 1 by: 

■ a. Revising the entries for ‘‘AL, T.H. 

Agriculture & Nutrition (Montgomery), 

Montgomery’’; ‘‘CO, Eagle Mine, 

Minturn/Redcliff’’; 

■ b. Removing the entries for ‘‘IN, 

Bennett Stone Quarry, Bloomington’’; 

‘‘IN, Lemon Lane Landfill, 

Bloomington’’; ‘‘IN, Neal’s Landfill 

(Bloomington), Bloomington’’; ‘‘KY, 

Airco, Calvert City’’; ‘‘MI, Barrels, Inc., 

Lansing’’; ‘‘MN, Arrowhead Refinery 

Co., Hermantown’’; 

■ c. Revising the entries for ‘‘MO, 

Missouri Electric Works, Cape 

Girardeau’’; ‘‘MO, Riverfront, New 

Haven’’; ‘‘MS, Chemfax, Inc., Gulfport’’; 

‘‘NC, Kerr-McGee Chemical CorpNavassa, Navassa’’; 

■ d. Removing the entries for ‘‘NJ, Reich 

Farms, Pleasant Plains’’; ‘‘OH, United 

Scrap Lead Co., Inc., Troy’’; 

■ e. Revising the entry for ‘‘OR, North 

Ridge Estates, Klamath Falls’’; 

■ f. Removing the entry for ‘‘PA, Butler 

Mine Tunnel, Pittston’’; and 

■ g. Revising the entry for ‘‘SC, US 

Finishing/Cone Mills, Greenville’’. 

The revisions read as follows: 

Appendix B to Part 300—National 

Priorities List 

TABLE 1—GENERAL SUPERFUND SECTION

State Site name City/county Notes (a) 

AL ...................... T.H. Agriculture & Nutrition (Montgomery) .................................................. Montgomery ...................................... P 

* * * * * * * 

CO ..................... Eagle Mine .................................................................................................. Minturn/Redcliff ................................. P 

* * * * * * * 

MO .................... Missouri Electric Works ............................................................................... Cape Girardeau ................................ P 

* * * * * * * 

MO .................... Riverfront ..................................................................................................... New Haven ....................................... P 

* * * * * * * 

MS ..................... Chemfax, Inc ............................................................................................... Gulfport ............................................. P 


tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 14, 2021 / Rules and Regulations 51013 

TABLE 1—GENERAL SUPERFUND SECTION—Continued 

State Site name City/county Notes (a) 

*******

NC ..................... Kerr-McGee Chemical Corp-Navassa ......................................................... Navassa ............................................ P 

* * * * * * * 

OR ..................... North Ridge Estates .................................................................................... Klamath Falls .................................... P 

*******

SC ..................... US Finishing/Cone Mills .............................................................................. Greenville ......................................... P 

*******

* P = Sites with partial deletion(s). 

[FR Doc. 2021–19448 Filed 9–13–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 79 

[CG Docket No. 05–231; FCC 16–17; FRS 

41603] 

Closed Captioning of Video 

Programming; Telecommunications for 

the Deaf and Hard of Hearing Inc. 

Petition for Rulemaking 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Correcting amendments. 

SUMMARY: This document corrects the 

final rules portion of a Federal Register 

document published on August 23, 

2016. That Federal Register document 

inadvertently removed existing rules 

requiring video programming 

distributors to exercise best efforts to 

obtain certifications of compliance from 

video programmers and requiring video 

programmers adopting Best Practices to 

certify to video programming 

distributors regarding adherence to Best 

Practices and to make those 

certifications widely available. That 

Federal Register document also 

prematurely amended rules to require 

video programmer registration and 

certification of compliance. 

DATES: 

Effective date: Effective on September 

14, 2021. 

Compliance date: The compliance 

date of section § 79.1(m) is stayed 

indefinitely. The Commission will 

publish a document in the Federal 

Register announcing the new 

compliance date. 

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications 

Commission, 445 12th Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20554. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael Scott, Consumer and 

Governmental Affairs Bureau, (202) 

418–1264, or email: Michael.Scott@

fcc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

document corrects the final rules 

document published at 81 FR 57473, 

August 23, 2016. 

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 79 

Cable television operators, 

Communications equipment, 

Multichannel video programming 

distributors (MVPDs), Satellite 

television service providers. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Katura Jackson, 

Federal Register Liaison Officer. 

Final Rules 

Accordingly, 47 CFR part 79 is 

corrected by making the following 

correcting amendments: 

PART 79—CLOSED CAPTIONING AND 

VIDEO DESCRIPTION OF VIDEO 

PROGRAMMING 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 79 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151, 152(a), 154(i), 

303, 307, 309, 310, 330, 554a, 613, 617. 

■ 2. Amend § 79.1 by 

■ a. Revising paragraph (i)(3); 

■ b. Adding paragraph (j)(1); 

■ c. Revising paragraphs (k)(1)(iv) and 

(m)(1) introductory text; and 

■ d. Adding paragraph (m)(5). 

The additions and revisions read as 

follows: 

§ 79.1 Closed captioning of televised video 

programming. 

* * * * * 

(i) * * * 

(3) Providing contact information to 

the Commission. (i) Prior to the 

compliance date of paragraph (m) of this 

section, video programming distributors 

shall file the contact information 

described in this section with the 

Commission in one of the following 

ways: through a web form located on the 

FCC website; with the Chief of the 

Disability Rights Office, Consumer and 

Governmental Affairs Bureau; or by 

sending an email to 

CLOSEDCAPTIONING_POC@fcc.gov. 

Contact information shall be available to 

consumers on the FCC website or by 

telephone inquiry to the Commission’s 

Consumer Center. Distributors shall 

notify the Commission each time there 

is a change in any of this required 

information within 10 business days. 

(ii) As of the compliance date of 

paragraph (m) of this section, video 

programming distributors and video 

programmers shall file contact 

information with the Commission 

through a web form located on the 

Commission’s website. Such contact 

information shall include the name of a 

person with primary responsibility for 

captioning issues and ensuring 

compliance with the Commission’s 

rules. In addition, such contact 

information shall include the person’s 

title or office, telephone number, fax 

number (if the video programming 

distributor or video programmer has a 

fax number), postal mailing address, 

and email address. Contact information 

shall be available to consumers on the 

Commission’s website or by telephone 

inquiry to the Commission’s Consumer 

Center. Video programming distributors 

and video programmers shall notify the 

Commission each time there is a change 

in any of this required information 

within ten (10) business days. 

(j) * * * 

(1)(i) Prior to the compliance date of 

paragraph (m) of this section, a video 

programming distributor shall exercise 

best efforts to obtain a certification from 

each video programmer from which the 

distributor obtains programming stating: 

(A) Tat the video programmer’s 

programming satisfies the caption 

quality standards of paragraph (j)(2) of 

this section; 

(B) That in the ordinary course of 

business, the video programmer has 


tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with RULES1