alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                      23,142,320
<SECURITIES>                                43,136,632
<RECEIVABLES>                                  776,799
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            67,055,751
<PP&E>                                      12,286,435
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,903,684
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              74,442,647
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,196,158
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,770
<OTHER-SE>                                  72,060,741
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                74,442,647
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               160,539
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,936,158
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,787,212)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,787,212)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1767 

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to require that lists of employees 

eligible to vote in organizing elections be provided to the National Labor 

Relations Board. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 14, 2015 

Mr. ROE of Tennessee (for himself, Mr. KLINE, and Mr. TOM PRICE of Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to require that 

lists of employees eligible to vote in organizing elections 

be provided to the National Labor Relations Board. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Employee Privacy Pro5 tection Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LISTS OF EMPLOYEES ELIGIBLE TO VOTE IN ELEC7 TIONS. 

8 Section 9(c)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act 

9 (29 U.S.C. 159(c)(1)) is amended by adding at the end 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1767 IH

1 the following: ‘‘Not earlier than 7 days after a final deter2 mination by the Board of the appropriate bargaining unit, 

3 the Board shall acquire from the employer a list of all 

4 employees eligible to vote in the election to be made avail5 able to all parties, which shall include the names of the 

6 employees, and not more than one additional form of per7 sonal contact information of the employee, (such as tele8 phone number, email address, or mailing address) chosen 

9 by the employee in writing.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7462
KEITH VINCENT BROWN, #188678, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MICHAEL W. MOORE, Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections; GERALDINE P. MIRO, Warden of Allendale Correctional Institution, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. William B. Traxler, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-3750-6-21-AK) Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: August 31, 1998 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Keith Vincent Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Marvin Coleman Jones, BOGOSLOW & JONES, Walterboro, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief onhis 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brown v. Moore , No. CA-96-3750-6-21-AK (D.S.C. Sept. 29, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Decatur Land Co. *v.*City of New Decatur.

*Street Assessment.*

(Decided November 27, 1913.

63 South. 1024.)

*Appeal and Error; Review; Presentation of Error.*— -Where there was no bill of exceptions, and the motion to dismiss the appeal from the action of the city council with respect of street improvement assessments was not enrolled by order of the court so as to make it a part of the record proper, such dismissal cannot be reviewed-on appeal.

Heard before Hon. Thomas W. Wert.

Appeal from Morgan Law and Equity Court.

Prom an assessment for street improvement by the city of New Decatur against the Decatur Land Company, the Decatur Land Company took an appeal to the Law and Equity Court. In that court an order was entered dismissing the appeal, and the Land Company appeals to this court.

Affirmed.

*57Eyster & Eyster, for appellant.

Counsel discuss the errors assigned with the insistence that the levy was not properly made and that the contention of the Land company should he sustained, and they cite authority in support of their contention, but in view of the opinion, it is not deemed necessary to here set them out.

Tidwell & Sample, for appellee.

The court cannot review the action of the trial court in dismissing the ap; peal for the reason that the order of dismissal was not enrolled so as to be made a part of the record, and such order is not presented by bill of *exceptions.-*— Craig *v. Etheridge,*133 Ala. 284; *Ewing v. Wofford,*122 Ala. 439; *Ex parte Highland L. Co.,*105 Ala. 221.

McCLELLAN, J.

— The single assignment of error is that the trial court erred in sustaining the appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal of the appellant, taken to the Morgan law and equity court from the action of the city council in respect of street improvement assessments. There is no bill of exceptions. There is, in consequence, no exception to the court’s action. The motion to dismiss the appeal was not *enrolled*by order of the court. Without a bill of exceptions, the motion not being *enrolled,*this court cannot revieAV the action of the court , below in sustaining the motion to dismiss the appeal to that *court.-*— Craig *v. Etheredge,*133 Ala. 284, 32 South. 65; *Ewing v. Wofford,*122 Ala. 439, 25 South. 251; *Barton v. Gas Engine Co.,*154 Ala. 275, 45 South. 213.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Dowdell, C. J., and Sayre and Somerville, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 4.6


 


DESCRIPTION OF THE REGISTRANT’S
SECURITIES


REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF
THE


SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


 


As of December 31,
2019, Hepion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. had one class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (the “Exchange Act”): (i) common stock, $0.0001 par value per share (“Common Stock”).


 


Unless the context
otherwise requires, all references to “we”, “us”, the “Company”, or “Hepion” in
this Exhibit 4.6 refer to Hepion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.


 


DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK


 


The following description
of our securities is intended as a summary only and is qualified in its entirety by reference to our amended and restated certificate
of incorporation and bylaws, which are filed as exhibits to the annual report on Form 10-K of which this Exhibit 4.6 is a part.


 


Authorized Capitalization


 


Our authorized capital
stock consists of 120,000,000 shares of Common Stock and 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.0001 par value per share (“Preferred
Stock”) in one or more series. As of December 31, 2019, we had outstanding 3,760,255 shares of our Common Stock, 85,581 shares
of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and 1,827 shares of our Series C Convertible Preferred Stock.


 


Transfer
Agent and Registrar. The transfer agent for our Common Stock is Philadelphia Stock Transfer.


 


Listing.
Our Common Stock is traded on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “HEPA.”


 


Common Stock 


 


Holders
of our common stock are entitled to one vote per share. Our Certificate of Incorporation does not provide for cumulative voting.
Holders of our common stock are entitled to receive ratably such dividends, if any, as may be declared by our Board out of legally
available funds. However, the current policy of our Board is to retain earnings, if any, for the operation and expansion of our
company. Upon liquidation, dissolution or winding-up, the holders of our common stock are entitled to share ratably in all of our
assets which are legally available for distribution, after payment of or provision for all liabilities. The holders of our
common stock have no preemptive, subscription, redemption or conversion rights.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001000577
<NAME>                        Simon Transportation Services Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         16,309,843
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  16,226,397
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (41,707)
<INVENTORY>                                       218,517
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               35,953,199
<PP&E>                                         88,444,794
<DEPRECIATION>                                (16,162,693)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                108,360,750
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          17,293,552
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           62,807
<OTHER-SE>                                     57,666,044
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  108,360,750
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              111,121,642
<CGS>                                                   0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 102,948,507
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                938,356
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 9,130,804
<INCOME-TAX>                                    3,451,351
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             5,679,453
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                    5,679,453
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        1.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        1.03
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 171 (Wednesday, September 8, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 50378]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19469]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Notice of Permits Issued Under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 
1978

AGENCY: National Science Foundation.

ACTION: Notice of permits issued.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish 
notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. 
This is the required notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Polly Penhale, ACA Permit Officer, 
Office of Polar Programs, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower 
Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314; 703-292-8030; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#82c3c1c3f2e7f0efebf6f1c2ecf1e4ace5edf4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c5848684b5a0b7a8acb1b685abb6a3eba2aab3">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 23, 2021, the National Science 
Foundation published a notice in the Federal Register of permit 
applications received. The permits were issued on August 2, 2021, to:

Permit No. 2022-002

1. George Watters

Permit No. 2022-003

2. George Watters

Erika N. Davis,
Program Specialist, Office of Polar Programs.
[FR Doc. 2021-19469 Filed 9-7-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# 2010

&"Verdana,Bold"&16Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center Proposed Publications &14Fiscal Years 2010 through 2011	

&"Verdana,Bold"&16Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center Publications &14Fiscal Year 2010	
http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2010/1137/http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2009/1190/http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2010/5015http://www.springerlink.com/content/bv834031865h2077/fulltext.pdf

# Sheet1
Preliminary Field Reports from the April 

High-Flow Experiment 

GLEN CANYON DAM ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, 

TECHNICAL WORK GROUP MEETING, JUNE 14, 2023 

GCMRC Project D: Effects of Dam Operations and 

Vegetation Management for Archaeological Sites 

This information is preliminary and is subject to revision. It is being provided to meet the need for timely best science. The information is provided on the condition that 

neither the U.S. Geological Survey nor the U.S. Government shall be held liable for any damages resulting from the authorized or unauthorized use of the information. 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vegetation Management and HFE: 

Basalt Camp example 2018 - 2023 

• NPS with Ancestral 

Lands Conservation 

Corps tribal crews 

have worked to 

remove invasive 

plants annually on 

sand bars since 2019 

• 2023 is first HFE since the effort began 

• Project Objective: USGS evaluating whether 

removal of riparian vegetation barriers 

located between river sand bars and 

archaeologic sites increases the resupply of 

windblown river sand to archaeological sites 

& thus increases the probability of achieving 

the LTEMP goal of preservation in place? 

Preliminary results, please don’t cite 
 

781 

782 

783 

784 

785 

786 

787 

2017 

2019 

2020 

2021 

2022 

Vegetation Management Area 

HFE 

Elevation 

Recent HFE deposit 

provides increased sand supply 

A0

2023 

10 20 30

788 

ELEVATION (M) 

A'

DISTANCE (M) 

 

May 2023 

May 2022 

HFE 

Erosional 

scarp 

Vegetation 

Management 

Area 

A

A’

A

A’

30 m 

30 m 

Preliminary results, please don’t cite 

Lidar monitoring at 

Vegetation Management 

Sites: 

Observations at Basalt Camp 
 

 

 

 

Vegetation Management and HFE: 

Mile 122 Camp example 2018 - 2023 

• Lidar monitoring 

occurs at 6 vegetation 

management sites 

• 2 sites (Basalt and 

122 mile camps) 

are also sand bar 

monitoring 

locations 

• Sites respond 

uniquely to 

management 

actions 

Preliminary results, please don’t cite 
Lidar Observations at Mile 122 Camp 

A

A’

A

A’

B

B’

B

B’

Vegetation 

Management 

Area 

Max elevation 

inundated by 

HFE 

Max elevation 

inundated by 

HFE 

VMA 

HFE 

Erosional 

Scarp 

25 m 

25 m 

Preliminary results, 

please don’t cite 
Vegetation Management and HFE: 

Summary of Preliminary Field Observations 

 

HFE erosion of vegetation management 

areas and aeolian (wind-formed) dunes 

HFE Sand bar deposition and building 

Increased supply of potential windblown river sand 

during spring and summer annual windy seasons 

Rapid river erosion 

of sand bar by 

post HFE flows 

Preliminary results, please don’t cite
#### Charles E. BLACKWELL, Claimant-Appellant, v. R. James NICHOLSON, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 2007-7031.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

June 28, 2007.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of Charles E. Blackwell’s unopposed motion to dismiss his appeal,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted.

(2) All sides shall bear their own costs.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 4.8
SCHEDULE OF NON-EMPLOYEES RECEIVING STOCK OPTION GRANTS
NEW YORK BAGEL ENTERPRISES, INC.
1997 GRANTS

<TABLE>
    NONQAULIFIED STOCK OPTIONS

     Date                                      Shares     Strike    Exercised
     Granted            Director               Granted     Price   (Cancelled)
     -------            --------               -------    ------   -----------

 <S> <C>                <C>                 <C>           <C>       <C>
 1   October 6, 1997    Bill Atherton       a   17,500    $5.500*       -
 2   October 6, 1997    David Murfin        a   17,500    $6.050*       -

 3   October 6, 1997    Bill Walsh          a   17,500    $5.500*       -
 4   October 6, 1997    Stan Clark          a   17,500    $5.500*       -
                                               -------               --------
                                                70,000                  -
                                               -------               --------
                                               -------
</TABLE>

  a  Nonqualified Stock Options have been issued outside of the New York Bagel
     Enterprises, Inc. Incentive Stock Plan to the above named Board of 
     Directors.


  *  These issuances are a result of the Board of Directors meeting dated 
     October 6, 1997 in which the Board repriced outstanding options by 
     canceling and re-issuing on a one-for-one basis at an excercise price of 
     $5.50 per share which is greater than 100% of the quoted close price of
     the stock of the corporation in The Wall Street Journal.  In addition, such
     re-priced options are to vest as originally granted such that the new 
     vesting periods shall be modified to give credit for the prior holding 
     periods.
PAGE 1 – STIPULATED JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANT DANA DEAN ALTMAN,

WITH PREJUDICE

Jennifer J. Middleton, OSB 071510 

jmiddleton@justicelawyers.com

JOHNSON, JOHNSON & SCHALLER, PC

975 Oak Street, Suite 1050 

Eugene, OR 97401-3124 

Phone: 541/683-2506 

Fax: 541/484-0882 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Jane Doe

John C. Clune, Admitted Pro Hac Vice

clune@hbcboulder.com

Keith M. Edwards, Admitted Pro Hac Vice

kedwards@hbcboulder.com

HUTCHINSON BLACK AND COOK, LLC

921 Walnut Street, Suite 200 

Boulder, CO 80302-5173 

Phone: 303/442-6514 

Fax: 303/442-5693 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Jane Doe

J. Michael Porter, OSB # 003560 

mike.porter@millernash.com

Michelle Barton Smigel, OSB # 045530 

michelle.smigel@millernash.com

MILLER NASH GRAHAM & DUNN, LLP

111 SW 5th Avenue, Suite 3400 

Portland, OR 97204-3614 

Phone: 503/205-2330 

Fax: 503/205-8504 

Attorneys for Defendants 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

EUGENE DIVISION

JANE DOE,

Plaintiff,

v. 

UNIVERSITY OF OREGON, DANA DEAN 

ALTMAN, AS AN INDIVIDUAL. 

Defendants.

 CASE NO. 6:15-cv-00042-MC 

STIPULATED JUDGMENT OF

DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANT

DANA DEAN ALTMAN, WITH

PREJUDICE

Case 6:15-cv-00042-MC Document 18 Filed 07/31/15 Page 1 of 2
PAGE 2 – STIPULATED JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANT DANA DEAN ALTMAN,

WITH PREJUDICE

 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the parties, through their undersigned counsel, 

stipulate to the dismissal of all claims against defendant Dana Dean Altman with prejudice and 

without fees or costs to any party. This dismissal does not affect any claims against defendant 

University of Oregon. 

DATED: July 31, 2015. DATED: July 31, 2015. 

JOHNSON, JOHNSON & SCHALLER, PC MILLER NASH GRAHAM & DUNN, LLP

By: /s/ Jennifer J. Middleton By: /s/ J. Michael Porter 

Jennifer J. Middleton, OSB # 071510 J. Michael Porter, OSB # 003560 

jmiddleton@justicelawyers.com mike.porter@milelrnash.com

975 Oak Street, Suite 1050 Michelle Barton Smigel, OSB # 045530 

Eugene, OR 97401-3124 michelle.smigel@millernash.com

Phone: 541/683-2506 111 SW 5th Avenue, Suite 3400 

Fax: 541/484-0882 Portland, OR 97204-3614 

Phone: 503/205-2330 

Of Attorneys for Plaintiff Fax: 503/205-8504 

Of Attorneys for Defendants

John C. Clune, Admitted Pro Hac Vice

clune@hbcboulder.com

Keith M. Edwards, Admitted Pro Hac Vice 

kedwards@hbcboulder.com

HUTCHINSON BLACK AND COOK, LLC

921 Walnut Street, Suite 200 

Boulder, CO 80302-5173 

Phone: 303/442-6514 

Fax: 303/442-5693 

Of Attorneys for Plaintiff

Case 6:15-cv-00042-MC Document 18 Filed 07/31/15 Page 2 of 2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 1 9 , 2016 

# Order

Clerk August 1 9 , 2016

15 3 796 ( 49 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 15 3 796

v COA: 3 2 5166

Kalamazoo CC: 2013

- 001818

- FC

DEONDRA LAMONT LIGGION

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion of defendant

- appellant to temporarily

hold the case in abeyance to allow him to file a motion for remand on or before

September 5, 2016, is GRANTED. The temporary abeyance shall end on September 6,

2016, or after the filing of the motion to remand, whichever occurs first.