alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

DA 21-0559 FILED 

SERGIO VALDEZ SALAS, 

Plaintiff and Appellant, 

NOV 1 5 2021 

Bowen Greenwood 

Clerk of Suprerne Court 

ShAto nf Montana 

v. ORDER 

ARBY'S, 

Defendant and Appellee. 

This Court reviews briefs to ensure compliance with Rules 11 and 12 of the Montana 

Rules of Appellate Procedure. After reviewing the Appellant's opening brief filed on 

November 12, 2021, this Court has determined that the brief does not comply with the 

below-referenced Rules and must be resubmitted. 

M. R. App. P. 12(1)(a) requires a table of contents, with page references, and a table 

of cases, statutes and other authorities cited, with referenced to the pages of the brief where 

they are cited. M. R. App. P. 12(1)(b) requires a statement of issues presented for review. 

M. R. App. P. 12(1)(c) requires a statement of the case. The statement shall briefly indicate 

the nature of the case and its procedural disposition in the court below. Appellant's brief 

lacks any of the above elements. 

M. R. App. P. 12(1)(d) requires that the statement of facts portion of a brief contain 

references to the pages or the parts of the record at which material facts appear. Appellant's 

brief contains no citations to any record. 

M. R. App. P. 12(1)(e) requires a statement of the standard of review for each issue 

presented, together with a citation of authority. Appellant's brief asserts no standard of 

review. 

M. R. App. P. 12(1)(f) requires a summary of the argument before the argument 

portion of the brief. The summary of the argument should include a heading identifying it as 

11/15/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0559
a separate section. The summary should be a clear and concise statement of the arguments 

made in the body of the brief. The Appellant's brief makes no summary of the argument. 

IT IS ORDERED that the referenced brief is rejected. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within ten (10) days of the date of this Order the 

Appellant shall file with the Clerk of this Court a revised brief containing the revisions 

necessary to comply with the specified Rules and that the Appellant shall serve copies ofthe 

revised brief on all parties of record; 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no changes, additions, or deletions other than those 

specified in this Order may be made to the brief as originally filed; and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the times for any subsequent briefing contained in 

M. R. App. P. 13 shall run from the date of filing of the revised brief. 

The Clerk is directed to mail a true copy of this Order to the Appellant and to all 

parties of record. 

DATED this 15th day of November, 2021. 

For the Court, 

By 

Justice
Glen Canyon Dam Technical Work Group Meeting 

November 8- 9, 2006 

List of Attachments 

No. Item Author / Presenter 

1 Action Item Tracking Report 

2 TWG Comment Form John Hamill 

3 Major FY07 AMP/GCMRC Milestones John Hamill 

4 Comparison of 06/07 GCMRC River Trip Logistics Ted Melis 

5 Foodbase Update: Current Gammarus Density in Lees Ferry is Similar to 

Early 1990s 

Ted Kennedy 

6 Update on Water Quality of Lake Powell and Glen Canyon Dam Releases 

PPT

Bill Vernieu 

7 Update on Recent Trends in the Downstream Fish Community Scott Rogers 

8a GCMRC Monitoring and Research Plan to Support the GCDAMP 

8b GCMRC Monitoring and Research Plan to Support the GCDAMP PPT

8c Memo from John Hamill to TWG, dated Nov. 6, 2006, Subj: Comment 

response re: Sept. 13, 2006, Draft Monitoring and Research Plan (MRP) to 

Support the GCDAMP FY2007-11 

John Hamill 

9a Science Advisors’ Input on the SPG Process and Science Plans PPT

9b GCD AMP Science Planning Group (SPG) Evaluation of Effectiveness and 

Recommendation PPT

Dave Garrett 

10a Assessment of the Estimated Effects of Four Experimental Options on 

Resources Below Glen Canyon Dam Draft Report dated Oct. 27, 2006 

10b Assessment of the Estimated Effects of Four Experimental Options on 

Resources Below Glen Canyon Dam Executive Summary

10c Assessment of the Estimated Effects of Four Experimental Options on 

Resources Below Glen Canyon Dam PPT

John Hamill 

Ted Melis 

10d A Review of the Western Area Power Administration Report on an 

“Economic Analysis of Power System Impacts of GCD Long-Term 

Experimental Options” 

Dave Garrett/ 

Science Advisors 

10e A Brief Introduction to SLCA/IP Rate Setting and CRSP Basin Fund 

Liquidity PPT

Clayton Palmer 

10f A Review of the GCMRC Report on an “Analysis of Biophysical and SocioCultural Impacts of Four Experimental Options” Dave Garrett 

11 Three documents: (1) News Release: Long-Term Experimental Plan for 

Operation of Glen Canyon Dam to be Developed, dated Nov. 3, 2006 

(2) FRN dated Dec. 12, 2006, Subj: Long-Term Experimental Plan for the 

Operation of Glen Canyon Dam and Other Associated Mgmt. Activities; (3) 

Mark Limbaugh Memo to the AMWG, dated Nov. 1, 2006 

Dennis Kubly 

12a Report of the Physical Resources Monitoring Peer Review Panel 

12b Report of the Physical Resources Monitoring Peer Review Panel PPT

Ellen Wohl 

13 Grand Canyon Treatment Plan Review PPT Joel Pedersen / 

Jonathan Damp 

14 Status of Sand Supplies in the Colorado River Below GCD PPT Ted Melis 

15 “A Report on Activities and Accomplishments of the GCD AMP Science 

Planning Group: 2005-2006 

Dave Garrett 

16 FY 2008 Budget presentation Dennis Kubly 

Additional documents provided at the meeting 

17 Status of Sand Mass Balance in the Colorado River Ecosystem Below Glen 

Canyon Dam 

D. Rubin, S. Wright, 

D. Topping 

18 Annual Report: FY 2006 Science Advisor Accomplishments and Proposed 

FY 2007/2008 Science Advisor Review & Advisory Science Program and 

accompanying PPT

Dave Garrett 

19 Review and Purpose of Technical Work Groups PPT Kurt Dongoske
Order issued October 11,2012

In The 

## (!niirt tif

## Apticals Fift1! Oiatrirt uf

## rxa at a11ui No. 05-10-00676-CV IISBC BANK USA, N.A., AS INDENTURE TRUSTEE OF THE FIELI)STONE MORTGAGE INVESTMENT TRUST, SERIES 2004--i AND LITTON LOAN SERVICING, L.P., Appellants V. JEANIE WATSON, TONY WATSON, AND MATTHEW G. AIKEN, Appellees ORDER Be

### fore Justices Bridges. FitzGerald. and Lang Appellees July 

### 27, 2O2 motion forrehearing is DENIEI).



### ‘ 4KERRY TTl/ERAl D 

### JUSTICE
Discussion Regarding the Developm

of Monitoring Metrics for the Goals 

Objectives in § 1.4 of the LTEMP F

Technical Work Group Meeting

January 25, 2018
AMWG Role ‐ LTEMP ROD § 6

• Sub‐bullet 2 of sub‐bullet 2

• AMWG will “advise...the Secretary...regarding...the

implementation of resource management objectives

research studies, and environmental and cultural

commitments...”

• Sub‐bullet 3 of sub‐bullet 2

• AMWG will “review and provide input on the report 

Congress]...The report will include...status of resourc

• Sub‐bullet 4 of sub‐bullet 2

• AMWG will “...provide advice on the status of resour

whether the LTEMP FEIS goals and objectives are bei

and...”
Development of Monitoring

Metrics

• LTEMP ROD § 6.1.c

• “The DOI, in consultation with the AMWG, will d

monitoring metrics for the goals and objectives 

those in Appendix C of the FEIS as a starting poin

• TWG Operating Procedures

• “Standing responsibilities of the TWG...is to cons

GCMRC in developing criteria and standards for

monitoring and research programs...”
LTEMP Objectives (abridged)

• Develop an operating plan for GCD.• Ensure LTEMP does not effect water deliverie

• Consider GCD operational modifications and 

actions to protect and improve resources.

• Maintain or increase GCD power while minim

cost and emissions.
LTEMP Objectives (abridged)

• Respect tribal interests and perspectives.

• Make use of latest science.

• Determine the appropriate experimental

framework.

• Ensure GCD operations and other actions are

consistent with law.
LTEMP Resource Goals

• Archaeological and

Cultural Resources

• Natural Processes

• Humpback Chub

• Hydropower and

Energy

• Other Native Fish

• Recreational Exp

• Sediment• Tribal Resources

• Rainbow Trout F

• Nonnative Invasi

Species

• Riparian Vegetat
+ Other Native Fish HBC temperature suitability

+ Nonnative Invasive Species Temperature suitability for warm-water and cold-water fish and pa

+ Natural Processes Qualitative metric (no quantitative metric developed)

LT
Meet

2 needs

with

1 deed?

Need 1 = status of resources

Need 2 = are goals and objectives being met
2017 Knowledge Assessment

++

‐ Other Native Fish‐ Tribal Resources
Example of Specific Measure

• MWh generated/year
Next Steps

• TWG member outreach to your AMWG

representative.

• Reclamation to develop process to complete
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. HAROLD PHILLIPS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF HAROLD PHILLIPS, APPELLANT, FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS.

Argued January 9, 1961

Decided January 23, 1961.

*Mr. William 0. Brudnick,*Special Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent *(Mr. Guy W. Calissij*Bergen County Prosecutor, attorney).

*Mr. Ojiarles Handler*argued the cause for appellant.

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division. 62 *N. J. Super.*70 (1960). Moreover, we conclude that the record reveals no substantial state or federal constitutional question which would justify direct appeal to this Court. *R. R.*1:2-1; *Colacurcio Contracting Corp. v.*Weiss, 20 *N. J.*258 (1955); *Starego v.*Soboliski, 11 *N. J.*29 (1952).

*For*affirmance—Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Jacobs, Prancis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Hangman—7.

*For*reversal—Hone.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices 

# Order

April 1 6 , 2021

16 2778(54)

162779

DELANEY LONSWAY, CAMERYN

LONSWAY, MICHAEL LONSWAY,

and SUSAN LONSWAY,

Plaintiffs

- Appellees,

SC: 162778

v COA: 350759

Washtenaw CC: 18

- 000857

- NH

YALE UNIVERSITY, YALE UNIVERSITY

SCHOOL OF MEDICINE, and ALLEN E.

BALE, M.D.,

Defendants

- Appellees,

and

JESSICA N. EVERETT, and ELENA

MARTINEZ STOFFEL, M.D.,

Defendants

- Appellants.

________ _______________________________

DELANEY LONSWAY, CAMERYN

LONSWAY, SUSAN LONSWAY, and

MICHAEL LONSWAY,

Plaintiffs

- Appellees,

SC: 162779

v COA : 350775

Washtenaw CC: 18

- 000153

- MH

U NIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN REGENTS,

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, and

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH

SYSTEM,

Def endants

- Appellants

. _______________________________________/I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 1 6 , 2021 2

Clerk On order of the Chief Justice, the motion for the temporary admission of out

- of

state attorney Peter A. Hessler to appear and practice in this case under MCR 8.126(A) is

GRANTED

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEETS OF NUTRITION MEDICAL, INC. AS OF JUNE 30, 1997 AND 1996,
AND THE RELATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS
ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,778,946
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  936,927
<ALLOWANCES>                                    33,197
<INVENTORY>                                  1,762,243
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,763,288
<PP&E>                                       1,122,402
<DEPRECIATION>                                 173,185
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,059,106
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,412,065
<BONDS>                                      1,643,145
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,202,467
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,198,571)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,059,106
<SALES>                                      2,543,978
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,543,978
<CGS>                                        1,931,434
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,931,434
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,517,107
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              91,145
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (908,590)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (908,590)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (908,590)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.17)
        

</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 27, 2013

NO. 03-13-00471-CV

Zeb Ryan Cummins and Sharon Marie Cummins, Appellants

v.

Joe Harrison Carr, Donna Leslia Carr, Joe Derek Carr, 

and Carmen Marie Cadena, Appellees

APPEAL FROM 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, ROSE, AND GOODWIN

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE ROSE

THIS CAUSE having this day come to be considered, and the Court is of the opinion that it is 

without jurisdiction of the cause and that the appeal should therefore be dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction. IT IS ACCORDINGLY ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction. It is FURTHER ordered that the appellants pay all costs relating to this appeal, 

both in this Court and the court below, and that this decision be certified below for observance.
SUBSIDIARIES:

     Intelligroup Asia Private,  Ltd., a corporation formed pursuant to the laws
of India and 99.8% owned and wholly-controlled subsidiary of Intelligroup, Inc.

     Intelligroup  Australia Pty Limited,  a corporation  formed pursuant to the
laws of Australia and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Intelligroup, Inc.

     Empower,  Inc., a Michigan  corporation  and a  wholly-owned  subsidiary of
Intelligroup, Inc.

     Intelligroup  Europe Limited,  a corporation formed pursuant to the laws of
the United Kingdom and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Intelligroup, Inc.

          CPI Resources, a corporation formed pursuant to the laws of the United
          Kingdom and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Intelligroup Europe Limited.

          CPI Consulting  Limited,  a corporation formed pursuant to the laws of
          the United  Kingdom  and 70% owned by CPI  Resources  and 30% owned by
          Intelligroup Europe Limited.

     Intelligroup  Hong Kong Private Ltd., a corporation  formed pursuant to the
laws of Hong Kong and a 50% owned  subsidiary  of  Intelligroup,  Inc. and a 50%
owned subsidiary of Intelligroup New Zealand Limited

     Intelligroup  Japan,  Ltd., a  corporation  formed  pursuant to the laws of
Japan and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Intelligroup, Inc.

     Intelligroup New Zealand Limited, a corporation formed pursuant to the laws
of New Zealand and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Intelligroup, Inc.

     Intelligroup Nordic AB, a corporation formed pursuant to the laws of Sweden
and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Intelligroup, Inc.

     Intelligroup  Nordic  A/S, a  corporation  formed  pursuant  to the laws of
Denmark and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Intelligroup, Inc.

     Intelligroup  Singapore Private Ltd., a corporation  formed pursuant to the
laws of Singapore and wholly-owned subsidiary of Intelligroup, Inc.

     Intelligroup de Venezuela,  C.A., a corporation formed pursuant to the laws
of Venezuela and wholly-owned subsidiary of Intelligroup, Inc.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Oak Hill Financial, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ron J.
Copher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/ Ron J. Copher

Ron J. Copher
Chief Financial Officer

May 10, 2005


                                      -23-
EX-99

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                           PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                       AND
                          PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER

                        PURSUANT TO 18 O.K. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB (the "Report")
of Amplidyne, Inc. (the "Company") for the year end December 31, 2002, I
Devendar S. Bains, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of
the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, that:

1     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2     The information contained in the report, fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

/s/ Tarlochan S. Bains                                  December 12, 2005
----------------------
Tarlochan S. Bains
Former Chief Executive Officer and Formal Principal Accounting Officer
#### BINGHAM et al., Respondents, v. NORTHRUP. Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 16, 1896.)

Action by Eunice Bingham, Mary E. Arthur, and Charles W. Bingham against Irvin W. Northrop, impleaded, etc.

No opinion. Order reversed, without costs to either parts7. *Jht'l.*that the judgment was premature because the time to answer did not begin to run until January 1, 1896. All concur.
FIL ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTHCI RCUI T DEC 21, 2010 J OHN L EY CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE U

NITED STATE S COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 0- 12 00 5 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock etNo. 1 :0 9- cr-0 01 07 -CG-B -1 UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A, ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Plai nt iff -Ap pe ll ee, ve rs us JOSHUA EDWARD LEDKINS, ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l D efen da nt -Ap pe ll an t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt forth e So ut he rnDis tri ctof Al ab am a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ (Dece m be r 21 , 20 10 ) Befo re HULL, W ILSON an d M ARTIN, Cir cu itJu dg es . PER CURI AM: Ro be rt R at li ff, ap po in te d c ou ns el forJo sh uaEdwardLedk in s i n thi s d ire ct cri m in al ap pe al , has m ov edto withd raw fro m furth er re pr es en ta ti onof Led ki nsan d fi le d abri ef p ur su an t t o And er s v. C al if orni a , 38 6 U.S. 7 38 , 87 S.Ct . 13 96 , 18 L.Ed.2 d 4 93 (19 67 ). Our i nd ep en de ntrev ie w of the en ti re re co rdrev eal s tha t co un se l’s as se ss m en t o f th e rel at iv e m eri t o f th e ap pe al is co rrec t. Bec au se in de pe nd en t ex am in at io n o f th e en ti re rec or d re ve al s n o arg uabl y m eri to rio us is su es , cou ns el ’s m ot io n t o wi th dr aw is GRANTED , andLedk in s’s co nv ic ti on an d s en te nc e is AFFIRMED .

2
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-19-00675-CV

IN RE Sarah Friend NEUTZE

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 16, 2019

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On October 3, 2019, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After considering the 

petition and the record, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, 

the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2016 CV2 002017, styled In re: Farmers Insurance Company Wind Hail 

Storm Litigation 2, pending in the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas, the Honorable Elma T. Salinas 

Ender presiding.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON

CRESCENT JONES,

Plaintiff,

v. 

CAROLYN COLVIN, Acting

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

Case No. 6:15-cv-2062-KI

JUDGMENT

Jeffrey H. Baird

Dellert Baird Law Office, PLLC

524 Tacoma Ave. S.

Tacoma, WA 98402

Attorney for Plaintiff

Billy J. Williams

United States Attorney

District of Oregon

Janice E. Hebert

Assistant United States Attorney

1000 SW Third Ave., Ste. 600

Portland, OR 97204-2902

Page 1 - JUDGMENT

Case 6:15-cv-02062-KI Document 21 Filed 10/28/16 Page 1 of 2
Martha A. Boden

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Office of the General Counsel

Social Security Administration

701 Fifth Ave., Ste. 2900 M/S 221A

Seattle, WA 98104-3710

Attorneys for Defendant

KING, Judge:

Based on the record, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the decision of the

Commissioner is affirmed and this case is dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 28th day of October, 2016. 

 /s/ Garr M. King 

Garr M. King

United States District Judge

PAGE 2 - JUDGMENT

Case 6:15-cv-02062-KI Document 21 Filed 10/28/16 Page 2 of 2