alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
infy-ex49_347.htm



Exhibit 4.9

 



 

First Addendum to Executive Employment Agreement

This addendum (the “Addendum”) effective as of June 22, 2019 (the “Effective Date”) is made to the Executive Employment Agreement (defined hereinafter), entered into by and between Infosys Ltd. (the “Company”) and Pravin Rao U. B. (“Executive” and together with the Company, the “Parties”)

WHEREAS:


	
 
	
1.
	
Parties had entered into an Executive Employment Agreement (“Agreement”) on 24th April, 2017





	
 
	
2.
	
Parties now desire to amend the Agreement, in the manner as set forth in this First Addendum.




NOW THEREFORE in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual provisions contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the parties hereto agree as follows:


	
 
	
1)
	
Clause 8 of the Agreement Titled Equity Plan shall be numbered as clause 8 (1) and a new clause 8 (2) shall be added to the Agreement to read as follows,




“2019 Annual Performance Equity Grant - Subject to the approval by the Board (or its committee), the Executive will be eligible to receive such number of performance based stock incentives in the form of Restricted stock units (RSUs) on an annual basis, having a market value of Rupees Four Crore (Rs 4,00,00,000) (determined based on the market price of the Company’s equity shares on the date of the grant), which shall vest 12 months from the date of each grant (“the 2019 Annual Performance Equity Grant”). The Vesting of the 2019 Annual Performance Equity Grant is subject to the Company’s achievement of certain performance milestones as set out in the Infosys Expanded Stock Ownership Program – 2019 and as determined by the Board (or its committee); and any RSU’s that do not vest as a result of the failure of the Company to meet the milestones shall be forfeited. The 2019 Annual Performance Equity Grant shall continue till the expiry of the pool of stock incentives available under the Infosys Expanded Stock Ownership Program – 2019, or until cessation of the Executive’s employment with the Company, whichever is earlier. The vesting and other terms of each Grant will be governed by the grant agreement between the parties.”


	
 
	
2)
	
Save and except to the extent expressly and specifically provided in this Addendum to the Agreement, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain unaltered and continue to remain in full force and binding upon the parties hereto.




 

 

Company Confidential - This communication is confidential between you and Infosys Limited







 

IN WITNESS whereof each of the parties have executed this Addendum, in the case of the Company by their duly authorized officer, as of the day and year first above written.

 


	
Executive
	
 
	
INFOSYS LIMITED

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Signature:
	
 
	
 
	
Signature:
	
 

	
Name :
	
Pravin Rao U.B.
	
 
	
 
	
Shanker Krishnamurthy

	
Employee No.:
	
1020
	
 
	
 
	
EVP and Group Head – Human Resources

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Date:
	
 
	
 
	
Date:
	
 




 

Company Confidential - This communication is confidential between you and Infosys Limited
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

Bridgit Beasley, P.C. 

d/b/a Blue Sky Wellness Studio 

for the 

District of Oregon 

Plaintiff(s) 

v. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Civil Action No. 

Blue Sky of Portland, LLC. 

Defendant(s) 

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION 

Blue Sky of Portland, LLC. 

To: (Defendant's name and address) 729 SE Powell Boulevard 

Portland, OR 97202 

A lawsuit has been filed against you. 

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it)- or 60 days if you 

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ. 

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3)-you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of 

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiffs attorney, 

whose name and address are: 

Thomas E. Scanlon 

The Law Office of Thomas E. Scanlon, LLC. 

650 Holladay Street 

Suite 1600 #60 

Portland, OR 97232 

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court. 

CLERK OF COURT 

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk 

3:15-cv-02327-JE 12/15/2015 By: s/Sutawnee Sellers, Deputy Clerk

Case 3:15-cv-02327-JE Document 4 Filed 12/15/15 Page 1 of 1
#### Malvin Lindenbaum, Respondent, v Michael Katzevman, Also Known as Michael Kass, Appellant.

— In an action to recover damages for breach of contract and for injunctive relief, the defendant appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Levitt, J.), dated August 29, 1985, which denied his motion to be relieved of his default in answering the complaint and to compel the plaintiff to accept *454service of his answer, and (2) an order of the same court, entered October 30, 1985, which denied his motion for reargument.

Ordered that the appeal from the order entered October 30, 1985, is dismissed as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated August 29, 1985, is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the plaintiff is awarded one bill of costs.

Special Term correctly denied the defendant’s motion to be relieved of his default in answering the complaint herein since the defendant failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse therefor and that he possessed a meritorious defense to the action. Mangano, J. P., Brown, Weinstein and Spatt, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Forrestene Hubbard, Appellant.

[946 NYS2d 867]

— Appeals by the defendant from (1) an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Gulotta, Jr., J.), rendered June 27, 2011, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that she had violated a condition thereof, upon her admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon her previous conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, and (2) a judgment of the same court, also rendered June 27, 2011, convicting her of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and *877criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the amended judgment and the judgment are affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on the appeals. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.],*89 AD3d 252 [2011]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Skelos, J.P., Balkin, Leventhal and Roman, JJ., concur.
Glen Canyon Dam Technical Work Group Meeting

February 26-27-, 2002

List of Attachments

No. Subject Author / Presenter

1 Attendance Sheets

2 Action Items from Nov. 13-14, 2001 Meeting TWG

3a

3b

Motions from Jan. 17-18, 2002, AMWG

Meeting

Motion Passed from AMWG Meeting

AMWG

4 SCADA vs. GCD Gage Power Point

Presentation

Bill Persons

5 Ad Hoc Group List Members

6a

6b

Aerial Photography PowerPoint

FY 2002 Annual Overflight Description

Steve Mietz

7a

7b

7c

7d

7e

7f

Snow Conditions

Upper Colorado Precipitation

Lake Powell Unregulated Inflow, WY 2002

Variability of Lake Powell, Apr-Jul Inflow

Glen Canyon Releases

Lake Powell Elevations

Tom Ryan

8a

8b

Experimental Flow PP Presentation

Memo dated Feb. 15, 2001

Steve Gloss/GCMRC

9a

9b

9c

Glen Canyon Releases (get from Tom)

Questions & Answers

Process for AMWG Mailing and Things to

Address in Version 2.0

Barry Gold

10 SP Memo to TWG (sent by Randy on 2/20/02) Randy Peterson

11a

11b

11c

GCRMC Memo, Dated Dec. 14, 2001

Revised FY 2004 GCMRC portion

FY 2004 Revised Budget

Randy Peterson

Barry Gold

Barry Gold

12 Final Draft Information Needs, dated 12/14/01 Barry Gold

Misc. / or not presented at the meeting

 Memo from Ruth Lambert to TWG, dtd Feb

15, 2002, Subj: GCMRC Comments on

Cultural PEP Report Recommendations

 Grand Canyon National Park Summary

Review of the “Cultural Resource Program

Assessment” (PEP review) July 21, 2000

 Northern Arizona Aquatic Food Base:

Probable Responses to Proposed 2002-03

Experimental Flows

 Version 1.1 Draft Scenarios and Rationale for

Experimental Flow Design in WY2002-03

 Experimental Flows Program - Fundamental

Questions

 Lees Ferry data synopsis for Experimental

Flows meeting

 Notes from Meeting with Trout Guides at

Marble Canyon Lodge

 Memo to Barry Gold from Andre Potochnik,

dated 2/11/02, Subj: Draft scenarios

Ruth Lambert

Jam Balsom & Lisa Leap

Emma Benenati

Randy Peterson

Bill Persons
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Christian Andres Ojeda,

 Appellant,

v.

The State of Texas,

 

 State.

 

§

§

§

 

§

§

§ 

 

§

'

'

No. 08-15-00305-CR

Appeal from the

Criminal District Court No. 3

of Dallas County, Texas 

(TC# F-1476216-J)

 O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the State’s third motion for extension of time to file the brief until 

September 17, 2016. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE 

STATE’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Susan Hawk, the State’s Attorney, prepare the State’s 

brief and forward the same to this Court on or before September 17, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 15th day of August, 2016.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service, Department of Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Internal Revenue Service Advisory Council will hold a public meeting.

# DATES:

 The meeting will be held Wednesday, September 22, 2021.

# ADDRESSES:

 The meeting will be held virtually.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                         Ms. Anna Brown, Office of National Public Liaison, at 202-317-6564 or send an email to                         *PublicLiaison@irs.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a) (2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988), that a public meeting of the Internal Revenue Service Advisory Council (IRSAC) will be held on Wednesday, September 22, 2021, to discuss topics that may be recommended for inclusion in a future report of the Council. The meeting will take place 4:00-5:00 p.m. ET.

                    The meeting will be held via Zoom. To register and for meeting link instructions, members of the public may contact Ms. Anna Brown at 202-317-6564 or send an email to                     *PublicLiaison@irs.gov.*                     Attendees are encouraged to join at least 5-10 minutes before the meeting begins.                

                    Time permitting, after the close of this discussion by IRSAC members, interested persons may make oral statements germane to the Council's work. Persons wishing to make oral statements should contact Ms. Anna Brown at                     *PublicLiaison@irs.gov*                     and include the written text or outline of comments they propose to make orally. Such comments will be limited to five minutes in length. In addition, any interested person may file a written statement for consideration by the IRSAC by sending it to                     *PublicLiaison@irs.gov.*

Dated: August 26, 2021.

John A. Lipold,

Designated Federal Officer, Internal Revenue Service Advisory Council.

[FR Doc. 2021-18870 Filed 8-31-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
October 2008 sediment 

• March-October 2008 has been one of th

tributary sediment-supply seasons on re

• During this period, the Paria River supp

(± 20%) and the Little Colorado River su~140,000 (± 30%) metric tons of sand 

• Review: Prior to 2008 HFE, upper Marb

enriched with ~1.7 million metric tons of 

• Only about 15% of this “new” sand is st• Post-2008 HFE sediment data from dow

reaches are still being processed

• Onset of equalization flows in April incre

of sandbars formed during HFE and effdoubled the export of sand

• Realtime acoustic sediment-transport d

served by December 2008

Preliminary results – subject to review and revision
0

50,000

100,000150,000200,000250,000300,000

EQUALIZATION FLOWS HAVE GREATL

INCREASED THE EXPORT OF SAND

MAR 2008

APR 2008

MAY 2008

JUN 2008

JUL 2008

CUMULATIVE SAND EXPORT AT RM3WATER DISCHARGE

MEASURED CUMULATIVE SAND EXPORT 

SINCE RECESSION OF 2008 HFE (metric tons)

810 metric tons / day

1,410 metric tons / day

1,780 metric t

Equalization flows start

NOTE: Tributar

y sand in

puts to upper Marble Can

yon near zero 

Preliminary results – su
October 2008 temperatu

• “Normal” post-dam August-October wat

at Lees Ferry ranges between 9 and 10 

• Because of warmer dam releases, wate

ranged between 11 and 13 degrees C aduring August-October 2008

• Instream warming owing to post-Septem

flows has been negligible

• Temperature data are now served at 

http://www.gcmrc.gov/products/ot

Preliminary results – subject to review and revision
10

1112131415161718

8/15/08

8/19/08

8/23/08

8/27/08

8/31/08

9/4/08

9/8/08

9/12/08

9/16/08

9/20/08

9/24/08

9/28/08

10/2/08

WATER TEMPERATURE IN DEGREES CELCIUS

61 MiLees Lees 

Preliminary results – su
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.02

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Transmeta Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark R. Kent,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, amended; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company for the periods presented therein.

Date: November 8, 2004                           By: /s/ MARK R. KENT
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Chief Financial Officer,
                                                 Transmeta Corporation

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Transmeta Corporation and will be retained by Transmeta
Corporation and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
1 –ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

TONY FRENCH,

Plaintiff, Civ. No. 2:15-cv-02431-CL

 Civ. No. 2:15-cv-02432-CL

v. Civ. No. 2:15-cv-02433-CL

Civ. No. 2:15-cv-02435-CL

CAPTAIN TURNER, et al., Civ. No. 2:15-cv-02436-CL

Defendants. ORDER 

 

_____________________________

MCSHANE, Judge:

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Findings and Recommendation in each of the 

above cases filed by plaintiff Tony French. The matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. Although plaintiff did not file objections, I reviewed the legal 

principles de novo. United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). I find no 

error and conclude the reports are correct. 

Although plaintiff did not file objections, he filed a motion to disqualify Judge Clarke 

and a Second Amended Complaint. The motion to disqualify does not put forth any facts 

Case 2:15-cv-02433-CL Document 12 Filed 06/29/16 Page 1 of 2
2 –ORDER

indicating even the appearance of bias. Instead, French simply states that for some unstated 

reason, Judge Clarke will not give him a fair trial. This bare allegation, without more, is 

meritless. Magistrate Judge Clarke’s Findings and Recommendations are adopted. The Second 

Amended Complaints are similar to the earlier complaints, largely illegible, and do not address 

the deficiencies pointed out by Judge Clarke. As further leave to amend would be futile, this 

action is DISMISSED with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 29th day of June, 2016.

_______/s/ Michael J. McShane ________

Michael McShane

United States District Judge

Case 2:15-cv-02433-CL Document 12 Filed 06/29/16 Page 2 of 2
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Pest Management Research: Sidney, MT
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    NPARL
                        Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory
                                    Agricultural Systems Research Unit
                                    Grasshoppers: Their Biology, Identification and ManagementSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Sidney, Montana Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory Pest Management Research PMRU Docs Grasshoppers: Their Biology, Identification and Management: Outbreak and Survey Info Forecast Maps





- NPARL Home
- PMRU Home
- ASRU Home
- Site Highlights
- Outbreak and Survey Info
- ID Tools | Apps
- Grasshopper Management
- IPM Handbook
- USDA Research | Contact Info

Outbreak Info: Grasshopper Forecast 1994headline bar /ARSUserFiles/30320505/grasshopper/Extras/images/Maps/hazard94.jpg Back to Outbreak Info      Next Map>


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit 32

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                           PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

                                       AND

                          PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER

                        PURSUANT TO 18 O.K. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying  Annual Report on Form 10-KSB (the "Report")
of  Amplidyne,  Inc.  (the  "Company")  for the year end  December  31,  2002, I
Devendar S. Bains,  Chief Executive Officer and Principal  Accounting Officer of
the Company,  hereby  certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  to the best of my
knowledge and belief, that:

1     The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2     The information  contained in the report, fairly presents, in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
      Company.

/s/ Tarlochan S. Bains                                           April 15, 2005
-----------------------
Tarlochan S. Bains
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
#### Malankara Archdiocese of Syrian Orthodox Church in North America et al., Respondents, v Mathew Thomas et al., Appellants. Board of Directors of St. Mary’s Malankara Syrian Orthodox Church of Rockland et al., Nonparty Appellants.

Submitted December 18, 2006;

decided February 22, 2007

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order that affirmed the denial of the motion to intervene, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ DALE T. SUNDBAKKEN, Claimant

- Appellant

v.

DENIS MCDONOUGH, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent

- Appellee

______________________

2021

- 1782

______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in No. 19

- 4071, Judge Joseph L. Falvey Jr.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

K ENNETH M. C ARPENTER , Law Offices of Carpenter Chartered, Topeka, KS, argued for claimant

- appellant.

E VAN W ISSER , Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent

- appellee. Also represented by B RIAN M. B OYNTON , C LAUDIA B URKE , M ARTIN F. H OCKEY , J R ; B RIAN D. G RIFFIN , D EREK S CADDEN , Office of General Case: 21-1782 Document: 35 Page: 1 Filed: 02/08/2022Counsel, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (M OORE , Chief Judge

, C LEVENGER and P ROST , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

February 8 , 2022 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court Case: 21-1782 Document: 35 Page: 2 Filed: 02/08/2022