alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2009173EN.01000601.xml

| 3.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 173/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 173/6

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 22 June 2009

on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan on certain aspects of air services

(2009/512/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 80(2), in conjunction with the first sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 300(2) and the first subparagraph of Article 300(3) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament,

Whereas:

| (1) | The Council authorised the Commission on 5 June 2003 to open negotiations with third countries on the replacement of certain provisions in existing bilateral agreements with a Community agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The Council authorised the Commission on 5 June 2003 to open negotiations with third countries on the replacement of certain provisions in existing bilateral agreements with a Community agreement.

| (2) | On behalf of the Community, the Commission has negotiated an Agreement between the European Community and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan on certain aspects of air services (1) (the Agreement) in accordance with the mechanisms and directives in the Annex to the Council Decision authorising the Commission to open negotiations with third countries on the replacement of certain provisions in existing bilateral agreements with a Community agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On behalf of the Community, the Commission has negotiated an Agreement between the European Community and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan on certain aspects of air services (1) (the Agreement) in accordance with the mechanisms and directives in the Annex to the Council Decision authorising the Commission to open negotiations with third countries on the replacement of certain provisions in existing bilateral agreements with a Community agreement.

| (3) | The Agreement was signed on behalf of the Community on 25 February 2008 subject to its conclusion at a later date, in conformity with Council Decision 2008/216/EC (2). |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Agreement was signed on behalf of the Community on 25 February 2008 subject to its conclusion at a later date, in conformity with Council Decision 2008/216/EC (2).

| (4) | The Agreement should be approved, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The Agreement should be approved,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The Agreement between the European Community and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan on certain aspects of air services is hereby approved on behalf of the Community.

Article 2

The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to make the notification provided in Article 9(1) of the Agreement.

Done at Luxembourg, 22 June 2009.

For the Council

The President

J. ŠEBESTA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 68, 12.3.2008, p. 15.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 68, 12.3.2008, p. 14.

2

---
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of
the Company for the periods presented.
  /s/ Robert J. Michel

Robert J. MichelChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer andPrincipal Accounting Officer)
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 17-0520

Filed June 7, 2017

IN THE INTEREST OF C.C.,

Minor Child,

W.C., Mother,

Appellant.

________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Clinton County, Phillip J. Tabor, 

District Associate Judge.

Mother appeals from a dispositional review order. AFFIRMED.

J. David Zimmerman, Clinton, for appellant mother.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Mary A. Triick, Assistant Attorney 

General, for appellee State.

Brian P. Donnelly of Mayer, Lonergan & Rolfes, Clinton, guardian ad litem 

for minor child.

Considered by Vogel, P.J., and Doyle and McDonald, JJ. Tabor, J., takes 

no part.
2

MCDONALD, Judge.

A mother challenges a dispositional review order continuing the out-ofhome placement of her child, C.C. We affirm.

The child was initially removed from the mother’s care in September 2016. 

See In re C.C., No. 16-1678, 2017 WL 104969, at *1–2 (Iowa Ct. App. Jan. 11, 

2017). A subsequent review hearing was held in March 2017. The department 

of human services recommended the child remain in the out-of-home placement. 

In response, counsel for the mother asserted, “[The mother] would very much like 

to have [C.C.] back home. However, she realizes that he’s doing well and would 

support the recommendations in the case plan.” The mother presented no

evidence. At the conclusion of the hearing, the court stated it understood 

continuing the placement “is not what Mom wants” but determined doing so was 

in the child’s best interest and ordered the existing placement to continue. The 

mother now challenges that determination.

The State argues the mother has not preserved error. We agree. See In 

re K.R., No. 16-1129, 2016 WL 4803911, at *2 (Iowa Ct. App. Sept. 14, 2016) 

(finding insufficient to preserve error father’s statement he “would like to see” the 

children come home “[i]n the future . . . but not today”). The mother “support[ed]

the recommendations” and did not present any evidence or otherwise challenge 

the continuing placement. Error was not preserved. See In re T.J.O., 527 

N.W.2d 417, 420 (Iowa Ct. App. 1994) (“As a general rule, an issue not 

presented in the juvenile court may not be raised for the first time on appeal.”).

AFFIRMED.
(November 10, 1986)

#### Robert Barker, Respondent, v Bruce S. Saltzman et al., Defendants, and Gerald Thurer, Appellant.

The plaintiffs cause of action against the defendant Dr. Gerald Thurer concerns, *inter alia,*the allegedly negligent administration of anesthesia during certain podiatric surgery performed upon him at Massapequa General Hospital, and is based upon a theory of vicarious liability.

The defendant Thurer contends that Special Term erred in denying his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and the cross claims asserted against him because he never saw, treated or consulted with any physicians regarding the plaintiff. He points out that during the period of the plaintiffs hospitalization at issue in this action, he was not even present at the hospital because at the time of the plaintiffs surgery, he himself underwent surgery at another institution. However, the record indicates that during his examination before trial, Dr. Thurer admitted that as Chairman of the Anesthesia Department of Massapequa General Hospital, he was responsible for providing anesthesia for all *618surgical patients at the hospital and that he employed assistants whom he supervised in the administration of anesthesia. Dr. Thurer also admitted that his office sent a bill to the plaintiff for the anesthesia and received a check made out to his professional corporation in payment for those services. After reviewing the hospital record, Dr. Thurer further conceded that it contained a signature in his name under certain handwritten notations which he denied writing.

In view of this and other evidence in the record, we agree with Special Term that triable issues of fact exist concerning the applicability of the doctrine of respondeat superior concerning Dr. Thurer’s possible liability for the allegedly negligent acts complained of by the plaintiff *(see, Impastato v De Girolamo,*95 AD2d 845). Lazer, J. P., Niehoff, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.
#### Appling *v.*National B. & L. Association.

Appeal from Walker Circuit Court.

Tried before the Hon. James J. Banks.

Appling & McGuire, for appellant.

T. L. Sowell and Holloway & Holloway, *contra.*

This action -was brought by the 'appellant against the appellee, to recover the statutory penalty of two hundred dollars, for the failure on the part of the defendant, after request thereto in writing, to enter upon the record of a mortgage, partial payments made on a rnort.gage debt.

Prom a judgment in favor of the defendant the plaintiff appeals. The judgment is affirmed on the authority of *Gwin v. National B. & L. Asso.,*121 Ala. 572.

Opinion by

Sharpe, J.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Charles Jackson, Also Known as Hasan Raqiyb, Appellant, v Robert A. Kirkpatrick, Superintendent, Wende Correctional Facility, Respondent.

[948 NYS2d 841]

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Russell E Buscaglia, A.J.), entered July 13, 2011 in a habeas corpus proceeding. The judgment denied the petition.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present — Scudder, P.J., Carni, Lindley, Sconiers and Martoche, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TOSUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          32,042
<SECURITIES>                                    60,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  104,486
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               231,260
<PP&E>                                         127,496
<DEPRECIATION>                                  62,408
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 429,214
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          106,842
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     316,405
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   429,214
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               430,984
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  309,242
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (19,740)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,678
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (37,418)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (37,418)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.74)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.74)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996             SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          22,469                  25,969
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  227,415                 205,322
<ALLOWANCES>                                    17,328                  13,832
<INVENTORY>                                    142,870                 128,694
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                          14,612                  12,477
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 445,884                 410,494
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           330                     330
<OTHER-SE>                                     126,095                 134,469
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   445,884                 410,494
<SALES>                                        182,300                  47,083
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               219,847                  55,797
<CGS>                                           48,218                  11,988
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  137,258                  34,718
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                50,104                  10,963
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 8,311                   1,316
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,245                   4,806
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,929                   3,994
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,105)                   (115)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,034                   4,109
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,034                   4,109
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.41                    0.15<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.40                    0.14
<FN>
<F1>FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS EXHIBIT, PRIMARY MEANS BASIC.
</FN>


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT                  As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 of Integrated BioPharma, Inc. (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Dina L. Masi, the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Integrated BioPharma, Inc. (the "Company"), certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley        Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to her knowledge: 

|  | (1)      | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--|-----------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2)      | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--|-----------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

                                   By: /s/ Dina L. Masi                                           Dina L. Masi

                                   Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001001109
<NAME> HELP AT HOME, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             951
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     5367
<ALLOWANCES>                                       179
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  6665
<PP&E>                                             658
<DEPRECIATION>                                     179
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   10099
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2493639
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            37
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     10099
<SALES>                                          16524
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 16524
<CGS>                                            10658
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    10658
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  5015
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (2)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    853
<INCOME-TAX>                                       357
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                496
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       496
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .22
        

</TABLE>
FOUNTAIN CREEK AT PUEBLO, CO.Latitude: 38.288Longitude: -104.601Elevation: 4705

FOUNTAIN CREEK AT PUEBLO, CO.

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Glen Cove Site Page...



Glen Cove
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 167 (Wednesday, September 1, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 49061]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19009]



[[Page 49061]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    The National Science Board (NSB), pursuant to the National Science 
Foundation Act and the Government in the Sunshine Act hereby gives 
notice of the scheduling of a teleconference of the Committee on 
Strategy (CS) for the transaction of National Science Board business, 
as follows:

TIME AND DATE: Closed teleconference of the CS, to be held Thursday, 
September 9, 2021, at 2:00-2:30 p.m. EDT.

PLACE: This meeting will be held by videoconference organized through 
the National Science Foundation.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Chair's remarks; review and discussion of 
proposed CS recommendation to the Board for NSF to transmit the 
National Science Foundation, NSB and Office of the Inspector General FY 
2023 budget submissions to the Office of Management and Budget.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Point of contact for this meeting 
is: Chris Blair, (703) 292-7000, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b4d7d6d8d5ddc6f4dac7d29ad3dbc2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5734353b363e251739243179303821">[email protected]</span></a>. You may find meeting 
information and updates at https://www.nsf.gov/nsb/meetings/notices.jsp#sunshine.

Chris Blair,
Executive Assistant to the National Science Board Office.
[FR Doc. 2021-19009 Filed 8-30-21; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Napier Talton *v.*Warden, Connecticut State Prison

*John B. Williams,*special public defender, in support of the motion.

Submitted May 8

decided May 21, 1975

The plaintiff’s motion for a review of the trial court’s refusal to make a finding in the appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County is granted and the trial court is directed to file with this court a finding, such as circumstances permit, setting forth the basis for its ultimate conclusion, including any claims of law made together with its conclusions thereon.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Barry Weisbrot, Appellant.

The defendant’s contention that his confessions should have been suppressed as the product of trickery, false promises and psychological coercion is without merit. Under the totality of the circumstances, including the fact that defendant was not under arrest and voluntarily accompanied the police to the station house, Criminal Term properly found that the confessions were voluntary.

The hearing court found the defendant’s claim that he was promised that he would be permitted to plead guilty to a lesser manslaughter charge if he cooperated was unsupported by the record and was not credible. We see no reason to disturb the court’s findings regarding the credibility of the witnesses *(see, People v Giangrasso,*109 AD2d 750), especially since the defendant never mentioned the alleged promise to the District Attorney or at the time his statements were taped. The interrogating officer’s promise that the office of the District Attorney would be made aware of the defendant’s cooperation, without more, is insufficient to render the statements involuntary *(see, People v Rykaczewski,*121 AD2d 409; *People v Perry,*77 AD2d 269). Nor does the fact that the police officers suggested to the defendant that he tell them what happened and get it off his chest require that the ensuing statements be suppressed *(see, People v Jackson,*101 AD2d 955).

We also reject the defendant’s argument that there was insufficient competent evidence to corroborate his confessions insofar as they pertained to the identity of the murder victim. It has long been the rule that once the fact of death has been proven, the identity of the deceased may be proven by circum*763stantial evidence *(see, People v Palmer,*109 NY 110; *cf. People v Way,*119 App Div 344, *affd*191 NY 533). Here, there was ample evidence to show that the victim was the same person named in the indictment, and the same person the defendant admitted to strangling.

The defendant’s claims of error with respect to the allegedly improper questions and comments by the prosecutor are unpreserved and, in any event, without merit.

Although the issue is not raised by the defendant, we note that the sentencing court should have directed that the sentences run concurrently *(see, People v Strouse,*96 AD2d 604). Bracken, J. P., Kunzeman, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1 - Certification of Principal Executive Officer



CERTIFICATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Internet America, Inc. (the Company) for the period
ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William E. Ladin, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ William E. Ladin, Jr.

William E. (Billy) Ladin, Jr.

Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 15, 2004