alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 3:14-cv-01658-PK Document 24-4 Filed 01/12/16 Page 1of1 

LISA R. J. PORTER 

JP Law PC 

5200 SW Meadows Rd., Suite 150 

Lake Oswego, OR 97035 

(503) 245-6309 

OSB NO. 025035 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

Shawn Edward Boatwright, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

CAROLYN W. COLVIN 

COMMISSIONER of Social Security, 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 

Defendant I 

ORDER 

Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-01658-PK 

ORDER GRANTING AW ARD 

OF EAJA FEES, EXPENSES 

COSTS 

Based upon the Plaintiffs Petition, the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 

2412(d)(l)(A) the assignment ofEAJA fees to Plaintiffs attorney by Plaintiff, as discussed in 

Astrue v Ratliff, 130 S. Ct. 2521U.S. (2010), and 28 U.S.C. § 1920 it is hereby ordered that 

EAJA attorney's fees of$3,548.89 and expenses $6.68 and costs of$14.00, if not subject to any 

offset allowed under the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Offset Program as discussed in 

Ratliff shall be paid to the Plaintiff, and_~_aile~d to the\t om.J's office. 

ll+h Done this day ofJanua , 2016. 

----/ 7 -----

Presented by: 

s/Lisa R.J. Porter 

Lisa R.J. Porter, OSB 025035 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

5200 SW Meadows Rd., Suite 150 

Lake Oswego, OR 97035 

v 

aul Papak 

U.S. Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:14-cv-01658-PK Document 26 Filed 01/12/16 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                       SIMON TRANSPORTATION SERVICES INC.
                SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF NET EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                   (Unaudited)



                                                                  For the Three Months Ended             For the Nine Months Ended
                                                          --------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                       <C>                    <C>                 <C>              <C>
Basic and Diluted:                                             June 30, 1999      June 30, 1998      June 30, 1999    June 30, 1998
                                                               -------------      -------------      -------------    -------------

Common shares outstanding beginning of period:                     6,109,834          6,286,364          6,180,334        6,283,674

Common share equivalents:

         Employee stock options exercised:
                  Basic                                                   --                 63                 --            1,908
                  Diluted                                                 --                 63                 --            1,908

         Common shares repurchased:
                  Basic                                                   --                 --            (61,167)              --
                  Diluted                                                 --                 --            (61,167)              --
                                                          --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Number of common shares and common
               Share equivalents outstanding
                  Basic                                            6,109,834          6,286,427          6,119,167        6,285,582
                                                          ==========================================================================
                  Diluted                                          6,109,834          6,286,427          6,119,167        6,285,582
                                                          ==========================================================================

Net earnings (loss)                                        $        (866,465)    $     (270,368)     $  (2,747,737)    $     16,476

         Net earnings (loss) per common share
               and common share equivalent
                  Basic                                    $           (0.14)    $        (0.04)     $       (0.45)    $       0.00
                                                          ==========================================================================
                  Diluted                                  $           (0.14)    $        (0.04)     $       (0.45)    $       0.00
                                                          ==========================================================================

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES, petitioner, v. Allan Wayne MORTON.

No. 83-916.

Aug. 16, 1984.

The petition for rehearing is denied.

*32
Exhibit 31.1

I, Kenneth T. Myers, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the registrant, Digital Lightwave, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants
other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: April 30, 2009



By:

/s/ KENNETH T. MYERSKenneth T. MyersPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
Previous Findings:

• Fish populations are food limited. • Food web in Glen Canyon is simple an• Midges and blackflies key prey items ev• Midges and blackflies are the only aqua

From 

C
But is having only two types 

insects unusual for a tailwate

 %EPT (mayflies, stoneflies, & caddisfli

Nationally accepted metric for assessinstream health

 DIRECT measure of the ability of a stre

support aquatic life

Ephemeroptera (mayflies) Plecoptera (stoneflies) Trichopter
But is having only two types 

insects unusual for a tailwate

 %EPT: Nationally accepted metric for 

assessing stream health

 DIRECT measure of the ability of a stre

support aquatic life

 OR ࢙ࢋ࢚ࢇ࢘࢈ࢋ࢚࢘ࢋ࢜࢔࢏ ࢌ࢕	#	࢒ࢇ࢚࢕࢚ ࢀ,ࡼ,ࡱ	ࢌ࢕	# = EPT

Ephemeroptera (mayflies) Plecoptera (stoneflies) Trichoptera 

Proportion o

stoneflie

caddis
Having only two types of insects (a

mayflies, stonefies or caddisflies) is 

Key: 1) Colorado River, 2) Kootenai River, 3) Flathead River, 4) Green River, 5) Madison RivRiver, 7) Bright Angel Creek, 8) Shinumo Creek, 9) Havasu Creek. Grand Canyon tributary dHealy, NPS. Regulated rivers data courtesy of Kim Dibble, USGS. 

By tGleinveassis IM

Grand Canyon 

tributaries

Regulated 

Rivers

Glen Canyon

Dam tailwater

Green River

San Juan 

River
• All proposed actions have potential to imp

the fishery and some have potential to im

the prey base and move assemblage to incmayflies, caddisflies and stoneflies.

• Habitat enhancements might create more

favorable foraging arenas for fish and new for bugs, but seems unlikely enhancementwill allow for colonization of mayflies, cad

and stoneflies.
• May gain additional insights about roles

temperature vs. flow and relation to lack 

mayflies, caddisflies and stoneflies.

• Planning to model EPT (mayflies, caddisfli

stoneflies) among tailwaters as a function temperature and hydrologic metrics. May whether flow or temperature are main faresponsible for current condition.
• After analyses complete, propose conveni

expert elicitation panel to evaluate likely cof zero EPT (no mayflies, caddisflies or sto

• Could include temperature alteration, flow

alteration, past extirpation and present

recruitment limitation, and habitat, and lik

interactions. Given the complexity, expertelicitation and modeling of data from othetailwaters most appropriate approach.
• Very interested in developing a new proje

focused on resolving uncertainties related 

enhancing the foodbase.

• Approaches outlined by FFF are logical nex

from science, learning and resourceenhancement perspectives

• Must work closely with NPS to help design 

project to maximize learning.
Exhibit 32.1

            CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                          OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, the undersigned Jack (J.D.) Draper, President and Chief Executive
Officer of FIRSTPLUS Financial Group, Inc. (the "Company"), do hereby certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that:

         1.   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter
ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  October 21, 2005                   /s/ Jack (J.D.) Draper
                                           -----------------------------------
                                           Jack (J.D.) Draper
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           Principal Executive Officer
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT 11
                    Computation of Income Per Common Share
                   (In thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>    
<CAPTION>  
                                                   Three Months Ended
                                                        March 31,
                                                 ----------------------
                                                   1997          1996    
                                                 --------      --------
<S>                                              <C>           <C>  
PRIMARY INCOME PER SHARE    

Average shares outstanding                         11,953         8,447
Net effect of dilutive stock options 
  and warrants-based on the treasury 
  stock method using average market price             479           555
                                                 --------      --------
  Total                                            12,432         9,002
                                                 ========      ========

Income:
  Net income                                     $  2,611      $  1,455
                                                 ========      ========

Per common share amount:
  Net income                                     $   0.21      $   0.16
                                                 ========      ========

FULLY DILUTED INCOME PER SHARE

Average shares outstanding                         11,953         8,447
Net effect of dilutive stock options 
  and warrants-based on the treasury 
  stock method using the greater of average 
  market price or market closing price                479           687 
Assumed conversion of certain convertible debt         29           430
                                                 --------      --------
  Total                                            12,461         9,564
                                                 ========      ========

Income:
  Net income                                     $  2,611      $  1,455 
  Add convertible debt interest, net of income 
    tax effect                                          4            62
                                                 --------      --------
  Net income after convertible debt interest     $  2,615      $  1,517
                                                 ========      ========

Per common share amount:
  Net income                                     $   0.21      $   0.16
                                                 ========      ========
</TABLE> 

NOTE:  All number of shares and per share amounts have been adjusted, when
       applicable, to reflect the three-for-two stock split in the form of a 50%
       stock dividend effected on May 31, 1996.


                                    Page 1
EXHIBIT
31.2





CERTIFICATION Pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I,
Dina L. Masi, Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer , certify that:1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Integrated BioPharma, Inc.;2.
     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a)     Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared; andb)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based
on such evaluation; andc)     Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
of directors: a)     All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)     Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date:September
28, 2007



By:/s/
Dina L. Masi

Name:
Dina L. Masi

Title:
Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF INCOME (LOSS) AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         345,158
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,648,828
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,442,244
<PP&E>                                      27,728,364
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,578,561
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              31,012,810
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,321,442
<BONDS>                                      5,389,533
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    16,760,098
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,219,311
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                31,012,810
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,367,091
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,958,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,546,859
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             265,671
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,362,984)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,207,745)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,155,239)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,155,239)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.46)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

3:16-CR-00051-BR 

Plaintiff, 

ORDER 

DAVID LEE FRY, 

Defendant. 

After a finding of a not guilty verdict at trial, this Court ORDERS the release of Defendant. 

DATED this 27th day of October, 2016. 

ORDER 

!- -\ /l/? - l{/1,/L/~'\..1'-/~1{! ,J VZ"f_.~/'\.,// 

ANNA J. BROWN 

United States District Judge 

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 1507 Filed 10/27/16 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 – ORDER AND OPINION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

EUGENE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 6:16-cr-00097-AA

 ORDER AND OPINION

v.

JAYDEN CHARPILLOZ,

Defendant, 

AIKEN, District Judge: 

 The Court heard oral argument on the defendants’ Motion to Reduce Sentence

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) on February 22, 2021. Doc. 57. Defendant

is currently being held in state custody while serving a twenty month in-custody 

sentence pursuant to a conviction in Deschutes County Circuit Court Case No. 

20CR01271 for sexual abuse in the second degree. Defendant received that sentence 

while serving a five-year term of probation to this Court. Following that disposition, 

this Court imposed a twelve month in-custody sentence as a sanction for defendant 

violating the terms of his probation by committing a new crime. This Court ordered 

Case 6:16-cr-00097-AA Document 65 Filed 02/22/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 – ORDER AND OPINION

that the federal sentence run concurrent with defendant’s state sentence. Because 

defendant would serve a three-year term of supervised release under Oregon state 

supervision, this Court did not impose any further federal supervision. 

First, the Court finds that defendant’s motion for compassionate release is 

properly before it. See United States v. Olawoye, 477 F. Supp. 3d 1159, 1162 (D. Or. 

2020); Albury v. United States, 2020 WL 6779643, at *3 (E.D. Va. Oct. 23, 2020). 

Based on the filings and oral presentations from both parties, and after full 

consideration of the relevant factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), the Court finds that 

extraordinary and compelling reasons, based on defendant’s health conditions in the 

face of the current pandemic caused by the 2019 novel coronavirus, warrant a 

reduction of defendant’s sentence to time served. See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13 comment. 

n.1(A). Further, this sentence reduction is consistent with the currently applicable

U.S. Sentencing Commission policy statements. Specifically, as defendant will 

remain in state custody and serve a term of state supervision following his release, 

the Court finds that defendant will not pose a threat to the community under 18 

U.S.C. § 3142(g). Accordingly, defendant's motion (Doc. 57) is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated this _____ day of February 2021. 

_______________________

Ann Aiken

United States District Judge

22nd

/s/Ann Aiken

Case 6:16-cr-00097-AA Document 65 Filed 02/22/21 Page 2 of 2