alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 10-KSB
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                          <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,035,920                  18,830
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,109,978               1,639,637
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (123,243)               (197,756)
<INVENTORY>                                    105,634                   7,392
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,279,556               1,678,430
<PP&E>                                       1,969,002                 913,600
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,174,468)               (628,826)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,359,203               3,201,012
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,939,106               1,735,453
<BONDS>                                      6,319,227               1,093,939
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       386,875                 379,598
<OTHER-SE>                                     352,360                 (7,708)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,359,203               3,201,012
<SALES>                                      9,684,294               2,771,522
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,080,291               3,050,924
<CGS>                                        5,300,096               1,265,074
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,665,061               3,019,418
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                80,228<F1>              24,869
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             941,719                  91,719
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (446,259)<F2>             (34,716)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   104,569                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (550,828)<F2>             (34,716)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (550,828)<F2>             (34,716)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.15)<F2>                (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)                   (.02)
<FN>
<F1>Interest income
<F2>(Loss)
</FN>
        




</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

SUSAN MARIE RISLEY, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

COMMISSONER, SOCIAL 

SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, 

Defendant. 

MOSMAN,J., 

EUGENE DIVISION 

No. 6:16-cv-00466-AC 

OPINION AND ORDER 

On January 9, 2017, Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta issued his Findings and 

Recommendation ("F&R") [13], recommending that the Commissioner's decision should be 

REVERSED and REMANDED for an immediate payment of benefits. Neither party objected to 

the F&R. 

DISCUSSION 

The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may 

file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge, 

but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The cowt is generally required to 

make a de novo determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or 

recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(C). However, the court 

is not required to review, de novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of 

1 - OPINION AND ORDER 

Case 6:16-cv-00466-AC Document 15 Filed 02/08/17 Page 1 of 2
the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See 

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 

(9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F&R 

depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject, 

or modify any part of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(C). 

Upon careful review, I agree with Judge Acosta's recommendation and I ADOPT the 

F&R [!i] as my own opinion. The Commissioner's decision is REVERSED and REMANDED 

for immediate calculation and payment of benefits. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this 8th day of February, 2017. 

ls/Michael W. Mosman 

MICHAEL W. MOSMAN 

Chief United States District Judge 

2 - OPINION AND ORDER 

Case 6:16-cv-00466-AC Document 15 Filed 02/08/17 Page 2 of 2
#### In the Matter of Stephen J. Williams (Admitted as Stephen John Williams), an Attorney, Appellant. Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Respondent.

Submitted January 16, 2007;

decided February 15, 2007

*859Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying appellant’s motions for reconsideration and for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Judge Jones taking no part.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6212

JIMMY WESTFALL,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WEST VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD MEMBERS; DOUGLAS

STUMP, Chairman of Board; BOB WISE, Governor,

Chief Executive Officer,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II,

District Judge. (CA-02-987-2-2)

Submitted: July 7, 2003 Decided: July 28, 2003

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jimmy Westfall, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Jimmy Westfall seeks to appeal the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing

his petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be

taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not

issue for claims addressed by a district court on the merits absent

“a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). As to claims dismissed by a district

court solely on procedural grounds, a certificate of appealability

will not issue unless the petitioner can demonstrate both “(1)

‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the

petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional

right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable

whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.’”

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir.) (quoting Slack v.

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 941

(2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude

that Westfall has not satisfied either standard. See Miller-El v.

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, , 123 S. Ct. 1029, 1039 (2003).

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF FIRST INDUSTRIAL SECURITIES, L.P. FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             958
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      138
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (50)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1046
<PP&E>                                           79722
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (5817)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   77191
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              691
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       76099
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     77191
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  3030
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    (790)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (462)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1778
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               1778
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1778
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1923 

To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to 

appoint a coordinator for issues relating to harmful algal blooms in 

the Great Lakes, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 21, 2015 

Mr. RYAN of Ohio (for himself, Mr. JOYCE, and Ms. KAPTUR) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 

and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to appoint a coordinator for issues relating 

to harmful algal blooms in the Great Lakes, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GREAT LAKES HARMFUL ALGAL BLOOM COOR4 DINATOR. 

5 The Administrator of the Environmental Protection 

6 Agency, acting as chair of the Great Lakes Interagency 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1923 IH

1 Task Force, shall appoint a coordinator to work with ap2 propriate Federal agencies and State, local, tribal, and 

3 foreign governments to address the issue of harmful algal 

4 blooms in the Great Lakes. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 171 (Wednesday, September 8, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 50431]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19453]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


VA High Risk List Action Plan, Managing Risks, and Improving VA 
Health Care

AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is given that the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) 
report, High Risk List Action Plan Update--Managing Risks and Improving 
VA Health Care, provided to the U.S. Government Accountability Office 
(GAO), is available for public review at https://www.va.gov/performance/. In this update, VA provides status on actions taken from 
March 2020 through May 2021, future planned actions with detailed 
project milestones, refined goals and objectives, a resource 
assessment, information on work related to the coronavirus disease 2019 
(COVID-19) pandemic and a response to critiques made in GAO's 2021 High 
Risk Series: Dedicated Leadership Needed to Address Limited Progress in 
Most High-Risk Areas (21-119SP), published March 2, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Rasmussen, M.D., Director for 
GAO-Office of Inspector General Accountability Liaison at 202-340-9429 
or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#25736d64141567626a646962646a6d77696553440b424a53"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="95c3ddd4a4a5d7d2dad4d9d2d4daddc7d9d5e3f4bbf2fae3">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: VA's commitment to addressing the management 
functions GAO highlighted in its report will ensure initiatives 
continue to be reinforced by sound policy; are implemented by staff 
with the right knowledge, skills, and abilities; receive the right 
information technology support; identify and secure essential human and 
financial resources; have management oversight; and are accountable 
throughout planning, implementation, and reinforcement. Leaders in the 
Veterans Health Administration, in partnership with the Office of 
Information Technology, continue to establish a unified vision for 
ensuring VA effectively takes action to address the five areas of 
concern and drives organizational accountability toward resolution of 
the high-risk listing.

Signing Authority

    Denis McDonough, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, approved this 
document on September 2, 2021, and authorized the undersigned to sign 
and submit the document to the Office of the Federal Register for 
publication electronically as an official document of the Department of 
Veterans Affairs.

Michael P. Shores,
Director, Office of Regulation Policy & Management, Office of General 
Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2021-19453 Filed 9-7-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Flaming Gorge Technical Working Group

Meeting Notes

Tuesday, March 28, 2017

In attendance: Heather Patno, Jerry Wilhite, Matt Breen, George Weekley, Kevin McAbee, 

Ashley Nielson, Dave Speas, Peter Crookston, Tildon Jones, Steve Hulet, Don Anderson, Dale 

Hamilton, Paul Abate, Leslie Bennett

• It has been a very interesting March. The Upper Green has stayed wet and the Yampa has 

dried out. 

• Hydrology Summary was reviewed

o The streamflow on March 21st has already passed record by almost double.

o This does not include March inflows.

o The Yampa is a different story. There has been significant melt except at the 

highest elevations. 

• The ROD allows flexibility for the May 1st classification. We have not seen such a 

difference between Flaming Gorge and Yampa hydrology. There is flexibility to move 

timing of water. We will be operating this year for dam safety.

• Question as to when the Razorback sucker will spawn, because in the last wet year (2011) 

spawn was June 24th. The increased flows out of Flaming Gorge will lower the water 

temperature. The peak of Yampa may happen before the Razorback sucker spawn.

• 2011 had the highest volume out of Yampa. This year the volume is much lower and will 

affect the water temperature.

• George Weekley shared that this year will be very hard to forecast as the conditions are 

unprecedented. He proposes the Pikeminnow spawn will be later than normal.

• As Kevin Bestgen was unable to be on the call, members would like to propose questions 

to him for additional information prior to the next meeting:

o To what extent do the water temperatures in the Green River display a que for 

spawning into the warmer Yampa River.

o What is the chronology of razorback sucker in the Green River

o Is there an advantage to bypass earlier prior to June

o If bypass is utilized in April and forward what affect to razorback sucker

o How does the different hydrology and snowpack in the two basins affect 

spawning chronology

• The ROD requires elevations lower in a wet year. Will need to utilize bypass similar to 

2011. Stakeholders in Price do not want a repeat of 2011. The fishing guides do not like 

the water to fluctuate due to bypass releases. Elevations are required below 6023 by May 

1st. 

• Next FGTWG Meeting will be held at 10:00 am on April 10, 2017.
Exhibit (10)(a)

    

    

    

    

    

    

    Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    

    

    

    

    We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in
      Post-Effective Amendment No. 30 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-170529) and Amendment No. 769 to the 1940 Act Registration
      Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08517), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 13, 2020, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 15, 2020, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln National Variable Annuity
      Account N for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    May 15, 2020
|Exhibit |  | 99.1 - Certification of Principal Executive Officer
|------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------



CERTIFICATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Internet America, Inc. (the Company) for
the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jack T. Smith, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Jack T. SmithJack T. Smith President and Chief Executive Officer February 14, 2003
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-23-00298-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 271st District Court

Wise County, Texas

Trial Court No. CV18-10-886

Before Walker, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Kerr, J.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

JOE RAMIREZ, Appellant

V.

JAMES KIRALY, Appellee
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have considered “Appellant’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal.” We grant the 

motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Appellants must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d), 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered: October 19, 2023
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,571,846
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,450,236
<ALLOWANCES>                                    22,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,208,394
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,163,949
<PP&E>                                      25,939,214
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,769,578
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              35,861,247
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       39,211,418
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        302
<COMMON>                                        19,469
<OTHER-SE>                                 (9,115,842)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                35,861,247
<SALES>                                    101,571,599
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           101,571,599
<CGS>                                      115,900,085
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              115,900,085
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               715,186
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (140,097)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (14,903,575)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    99,240
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (15,002,815)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (15,002,815)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.87)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.87)
<PAGE>


</TABLE>