alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. German SEVILLA-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-50624.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 16, 2007.*

Filed April 20, 2007.

David L. Katz, Michael J. Crowley, Esq., USSD—Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Andrew K. Nietor, Esq., Law Offices of Andrew K. Nietor, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, GRABER, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

*790MEMORANDUM **

German Sevilla-Rodriguez appeals from the 57-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for attempted entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We vacate and remand.

Sevilla-Rodriguez was sentenced in 2004 under the mandatory Sentencing Guidelines, before the Supreme Court rendered the Guidelines advisory in *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). The Sixth Amendment challenges to his sentence that Sevilla-Rodriguez raised before the district court were sufficient to preserve his claim that he is entitled to resentencing under the advisory Guidelines regime. *See United States v. Beng-Salazar,*452 F.3d 1088, 1097 (9th Cir.2006). We vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing. *See id.*

Sevilla-Rodriguez’s challenges to the constitutionality of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) and the continuing validity of *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), are foreclosed. *See Beng-Salazar,*452 F.3d at 1097.

Because we vacate and remand for re-sentencing, we do not reach Sevilla-Rodriguez’s remaining contentions.

VACATED and REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
1 - JUDGMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

JEROME H. WALDHER, JR. No. 6:15-cv-02012-HZ

Plaintiff, JUDGMENT

v.

COMMISSIONER SOCIAL 

SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, 

Defendant.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:

Based on the record, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the decision of the 

Commissioner is reversed and remanded pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for 

further administrative proceedings.

DATED this day of , 2016.

____________________________________ 

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ

United States District Judge

Case 6:15-cv-02012-HZ Document 21 Filed 12/12/16 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 23

Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm

We
consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated March 10, 2009,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Intelligroup, Inc.,
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008,
in each of the following:

|Registration
      Statement No. 333-11486 on Form S-8 
|-------------------------------------------------------
|Registration
      Statement No. 333-139639 on Form S-8
|Registration
      Statement No. 333-133751 on Form S-8
|Registration
      Statement No. 333-70244 on Form S-8 
|Registration
      Statement No. 333-31809 on Form S-8 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLPMetropark,
New JerseyMarch 19, 2009

---
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2216

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to make certain changes

related to payments for graduate medical education under the medicare

program.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 25, 1998

Ms. COLLINS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to make

certain changes related to payments for graduate medical

education under the medicare program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Graduate Medical Edu5 cation Technical Amendments of 1998’’.

6 SEC. 2. INDIRECT GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION AD7 JUSTMENT.

8 Section 1886(d)(5)(B)(v) of the Social Security Act

9 (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(5)(B)(v)) (as added by section
2

•S 2216 IS

1 4621(b) of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997) is amended

2 by striking ‘‘in the hospital with respect to the hospital’s

3 most recent cost reporting period ending on or before De4 cember 31, 1996’’ and inserting ‘‘who were appointed by

5 the hospital’s approved medical residency training pro6 grams for the hospital’s most recent cost reporting period

7 ending on or before December 31, 1996. The preceding

8 sentence shall not apply to a hospital that sponsors only

9 1 allopathic or osteopathic residency program.’’.

10 SEC. 3. DIRECT GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION ADJUST11 MENT.

12 (a) LIMITATION ON NUMBER OF RESIDENTS.—Sec13 tion 1886(h)(4)(F) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

14 1395ww(h)(4)(F)) (as added by section 4623 of the Bal15 anced Budget Act of 1997) is amended by inserting ‘‘who

16 were appointed by the hospital’s approved medical resi17 dency training programs’’ after ‘‘may not exceed the num18 ber of such full-time equivalent residents’’.

19 (b) FUNDING FOR NEW PROGRAMS.—The first sen20 tence of section 1886(h)(4)(H)(i) of the Social Security

21 Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(h)(4)(H)(i)) (as added by section

22 4623 of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997) is amended

23 inserting ‘‘and before September 30, 1999’’ after ‘‘Janu24 ary 1, 1995’’.
3

•S 2216 IS

1 (c) FUNDING FOR PROGRAMS MEETING RURAL

2 NEEDS.—The second sentence of section 1886(h)(4)(H)(i)

3 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

4 1395ww(h)(4)(H)(i)) (as added by section 4623 of the

5 Balanced Budget Act of 1997) is amended by striking the

6 period at the end and inserting ‘‘, including facilities that

7 are not located in an underserved rural area but have es8 tablished separately accredited rural training tracks.’’.

9 SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

10 The amendments made by this Act shall take effect

11 as if included in the enactment of the Balanced Budget

12 Act of 1997.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 173 (Friday, September 10, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 50745]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19507]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent Decree

    In accordance with Departmental Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that a proposed Consent Decree in United States v. Acquest 
Transit, LLC, et al., No. 09-cv-55, was lodged with the United States 
District Court for the Western District of New York on September 3, 
2021.
    This proposed Consent Decree concerns a complaint filed by the 
United States against Defendants Acquest Transit, LLC, Acquest 
Development LLC, and William L. Huntress, pursuant to 33 U.S.C. 1319, 
to obtain injunctive relief from and impose civil penalties against the 
Defendants for violating the Clean Water Act by discharging pollutants 
without a permit into waters of the United States. The proposed Consent 
Decree resolves these allegations by requiring the Defendants to make a 
payment to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 
Natural Resource Damages Fund.
    The Department of Justice will accept written comments relating to 
this proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30) days from the date of 
publication of this Notice. Please address comments to Tsuki Hoshijima, 
Post Office Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#93e3e6f1f0fcfefef6fde7ccf6f7e0bdf6fde1f7d3e6e0f7fcf9bdf4fce5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c4b4b1a6a7aba9a9a1aab09ba1a0b7eaa1aab6a084b1b7a0abaeeaa3abb2">[email protected]</span></a> and refer to United States v. Acquest 
Transit, LLC, et al., DJ # 90-5-1-1-18377.
    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Clerk's Office, 
United States District Court for the Western District of New York, 2 
Niagara Square, Buffalo, NY 14202. In addition, the proposed Consent 
Decree may be examined electronically at http://www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees.

Cherie Rogers,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Defense Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2021-19507 Filed 9-9-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Grand Canyon Rainbow Trout

2012 Monitoring Results

Mike Anderson

Arizona Game and Fish Department 

Research Branch
AGFD Rainbow Trout Monitoring

• Lees Ferry: 1991-2012

– Seasonal sampling

• Electrofishing

• Angler Creel

• Whirling Disease

• Marble/Grand Canyon: 2000-2012

– Yearly sampling

• Electrofishing
Paria River

RM 1

Little Colorado River

RM 61

Bright Angel Creek

RM 87

Havasu Creek

RM 155

Diamond Creek

RM 225

Tapeats Creek

RM 133

Pearce Ferry

RM 279

Nankoweap Creek

RM 51
Lees Ferry

RM -15–0

Marble Canyon

RM 0-40

Little Colorado Confluence

RM 40-80

Pearce Ferry

RM 279

Lees Ferry

RM 0

Year

2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012

Rainbow trout CPUE (fish/hr)

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

All Fish

<6" Fish
Apr July Oct

Rainbow trout relative abundance

(catch per minute; mean ± 2. S.E.)

02468

10

<6"

6-12"

12-16"

>16"
Length

0 100 200 300 400 500

Percent of Catch

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

Length

0 100 200 300 400 500

Percent of Catch

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

• 2011

• 133 ± 2.8 mm

• 80% <150 mm

• 8% 150-300 mm

• 12% >300 mm

• 2012

• 185 ± 4.3 mm

• 40% <150 mm

• 45% 150-300 mm

• 15% >300 mm
Year

2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012

Angler Catch Rate (fish/hr)

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

2.2

Angler Catch Rate
Pre-HFE Post-HFE

Angler catch rate (fish/hr)

02468

10

12
• 2012-10% Detection rate 

• Confirmed through histology

• 2011-25% Detection rate 

• Confirmed through histology

• 1999-2006-Not detected

• 2007-Detected in PCR 

• Not confirmed by histology

• 2008-2010-Not Detected

Whirling Disease

• Batch testing

• Individual testing
50
Year

2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012

Rainbow trout CPUE (fish/hr)

0

100

200

300

400

500

RM 0-40
Total Length (mm)

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Percent Total Catch

0

2

4

6

8

10

2012 

2000-2011

Mean Total length

• 2000–2011; 260.7 ± 0.94

• 2012; 210.5 ± 4.27
Year

2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012

Rainbow trout CPUE (fish/hr)

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

RM -15-0

RM 0-40
Total Length (mm)

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Percent Total Catch

02468

10

RM -15-0

RM 0-80
Density Capture Probability

Rainbow Trout Density (fish/mile)

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

Capture Probability

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

0.14

0.16

RM 1.5-2.5

RM 3-4

RM 60-61

Year

2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012

Rainbow trout CPUE (fish/hr)

0

50

100

150

200

250

RM 40-61.7

RM 61.7-80

Year

2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012

Rainbow trout CPUE (fish/hr)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

RM 0-265
2012 Summary

• Lees Ferry

– 2008 High flow event

– 2011 Equalization flows

• Marble Canyon 

– Larger size

– Similar abundance to Lees Ferry

• Grand Canyon

– Decreased abundance downstream of LCR

– Tributary influence
Questions?
Technical Work Group Meeting

Revised DRAFT AGENDA

Glen Canyon Dam

Adaptive Management Program

Technical Work Group Meeting

Hawthorne Suite Hotel 

I-10 and University Drive

Phoenix, Arizona

“Ballroom”

March 14, 2001

START

TIME TOPIC PERSON PURPOSE MATERIALS

9:30 a.m. Welcome and

Administrative

Rick Johnson 1. Introductions and

Determination of Quorum

2. Review Action Items from

February 13-14, 2001, Mtg.

3. Approval of Feb. 13-14, 2001

Meeting Minutes

Agenda

Action Items

Draft Minutes

9:45 a.m. Legislative & AMWG

Updates

Randy Peterson 1. AMWG Report by Steve

Magnussen

2. Letter from Reclamation to

WAPA

3. Murkowski Bill language

4. Tribal funding

5. California power crisis

Legislative

Updates

10 a.m. Strategic Plan Mary Orton and

Ad Hoc

Committee

1. Concurrence on Management

Objectives

2. Comments on Strategic Plan

Writing Assignments

Strategic Plan

12 noon L U N C H

1 p.m. Strategic Plan Mary Orton Comments on Vision Narrative Strategic Plan

2 p.m. Hydrology and 

LIDAR Update

Tom Ryan

Barry Gold

Information Hydrology 

2:45 pm. B R E A K 

3 p.m. Recovery Goals Tom Czapla Information Information

 4 p.m. Wrap-up and Adjourn Rick Johnson
Technical Work Group Meeting

Revised DRAFT AGENDA

Glen Canyon Dam

Adaptive Management Program

Technical Work Group Meeting

Hawthorne Suite Hotel 

I-10 and University Drive

Phoenix, Arizona

“Ballroom”

March 15, 2001

START

TIME TOPIC PERSON PURPOSE MATERIALS

8 a.m. Welcome and

Administrative

Rick Johnson Introductions

Determination of Quorum

Agenda

8:15 a.m. PEP & Compliance

Process Diagrams

Dennis Kubly Develop next steps Process Diagram

9:00 a.m. Status and Trends

Lees Ferry Fishery

Bill Persons Information Information

9:30 a.m. River Trip Update Barry Gold

10:00 a.m. B R E A K 

10:15 a.m. TCD Update Dennis Kubly Information Information

11:15 a.m. Ad Hoc Group

Updates

Ted Melis Sediment Ad Hoc Group

Updates

Randy Peterson Experimental Flows

Clayton Palmer LSSF Study Cost Analysis

11:45 a.m. Wrap-up Rick Johnson

Randy Peterson

1. Future agenda items

2. Meeting Review

12 noon Adjourn Rick Johnson
Annual Reporting Meeting 2018

Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center – Flagstaff, Arizona

March 6 – 7, 2018

List of Presentations

No. Presentation Author / Presenter

AR01 2017 Hualapai zebra-tailed lizard monitoring PPT Kerry Christensen

AR02 Key drivers of sand transport and storage in the Colorado 

River Ecosystem PPT

David Topping

AR03 Sandbars and Sediment Storage in Marble and Grand 

Canyons: Response to Recent High-flow Experiments and 

Long-term Trends

Paul Grams

AR04 Glen Canyon Dam Hydropower Production and Value, Status 

and Trends 2018

Clayton Palmer

AR05 What’s it Worth? A survey of GCDAMP economic surveys 

and their usefulness in decision making

Lucas Bair

AR06 Riparian vegetation monitoring and research in the Colorado 

River Ecosystem PPT

Brad Butterfield

AR07 Kinship to the Canyon: Hualapai Monitoring & Ethnobotany 

in the Grand Canyon

Carrie Cannon

AR08 Colorado River Benthic Foodbase Studies in Glen and Grand 

Canyons

Larry Stevens

AR09 Shedding light on aquatic insects of the Colorado River Basin 

with citizen science

Anya Metcalfe

AR10 Bug flow optimizations and predictions Jeff Muehlbauer

AR11 Temperature and nutrients as ecosystem drivers in the 

Colorado River

Charles Yackulic

Lake Powell as a regulator of temperature Kim Dibble

Lake Powell as a regulator of nutrients Bridget Deemer

AR12 Effects of HFEs on Growth and Population Dynamics of 

Rainbow Trout in Glen Canyon and Marble Canyon

Josh Korman

Mike Yard

AR13 AGFD Lees Ferry long term monitoring Dave Rogowski

AR14 Turbidity as a management tool to constrain Rainbow Trout 

downstream of the Paria River PPT

David Ward

AR15 Invasives and other Non-Native aquatic species of the Lees 

Ferry Reach of the Colorado River PPT 

Mark Anderson

Ken Hyde

AR16 Brown Trout Telemetry at Lees Ferry and Grand Canyon, 

Arizona

Bob Schelly

AR17 Drivers of humpback chub population dynamics Maria Dzul

AR18 Modeling humpback chub, adaptive management and 

LTEMP experiments

Lucas Bair

AR19 Razorback sucker Xyrauchen texanus research and 

monitoring in the Colorado River inflow area of Lake Mead 

and Grand Canyon, Arizona and Nevada PPT

Howard Brandenberg

AR20 AGFD Grand Canyon Systemwide Fish Monitoring Jan Boyer

AR21 Basin Hydrology, Operations and 2018 Hydrograph Paul Davidson
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 168 (Thursday, September 2, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 49408]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19140]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 11528]


United States Passports Invalid for Travel to, in, or Through the 
Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK)

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice of extension of passport travel restriction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On September 1, 2017, all U.S. passports were declared invalid 
for travel to, in, or through the Democratic People's Republic of Korea 
(DPRK), unless specially validated for such travel. The restriction was 
extended for one year in 2018, 2019, and 2020. This notice extends the 
restriction until August 31, 2022, unless extended or revoked by the 
Secretary of State.

DATES: The extension of the travel restriction is in effect on 
September 2, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lawrence Kovaciny, Bureau of Consular 
Affairs, Passport Services, Office of Adjudication, 202-485-8800.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On September 1, 2017, pursuant to the 
authority of 22 U.S.C. 211a and Executive Order 11295 (31 FR 10603), 
and in accordance with 22 CFR 51.63(a)(3), all U.S. passports were 
declared invalid for travel to, in, or through the DPRK unless 
specially validated for such travel. The restriction was renewed on 
September 1, 2018, September 1, 2019, and again for another year 
effective September 1, 2020.
    The Department of State has determined there continues to be 
serious risk to U.S. citizens and nationals of arrest and long-term 
detention constituting imminent danger to their physical safety, as 
defined in 22 CFR 51.63(a)(3). Accordingly, all U.S. passports shall 
remain invalid for travel to, in, or through the DPRK unless specially 
validated for such travel under the authority of the Secretary of 
State. This extension to the restriction of travel to the DPRK shall be 
effective upon publication of this notice in the Federal Register and 
shall expire on August 31, 2022, unless extended or revoked by the 
Secretary of State.

    Dated: August 30, 2021.
Brian P. McKeon,
Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources.
[FR Doc. 2021-19140 Filed 9-1-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-13-P
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-30309

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Eddie Darnell Jones, Sr., 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 3:19-CR-72-1

Before King, Costa, and Ho, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The FPD appointed to represent Eddie Darnell Jones, Sr., has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 

(5th Cir. 2011). Jones has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 14, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-30309 Document: 00516237829 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/14/2022
No. 21-30309

2

brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur 

with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 21-30309 Document: 00516237829 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/14/2022
#### Reginald Durand *v.*United Aircraft Corporation et al.

*George A. Downing,*for the appellants (defendants).

No appearance for the appellee (plaintiff).

Argued April 1

decided April 1, 1975

The plaintiff having done nothing to defend against the defendants’ appeal from the judgment of the Superior Court in New Haven County since the defendants’ brief was filed in November, 1973, the defendants’ motion for judgment sustaining their appeal is granted.
#### EX PARTE WHITE.

(Decided June 18, 1912.)

Original petition in Supreme Court.

Daniel W. Troy, for petitioner.- R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for State.

Per curiam.

Petition denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1910 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1910

To require the Secretary of the Treasury to convene a panel to solicit 
 recommendations for and select a portrait of a woman to be used in a 
               redesign of the $20 Federal Reserve note.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 21, 2015

Mr. Gutieerrez introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Secretary of the Treasury to convene a panel to solicit 
 recommendations for and select a portrait of a woman to be used in a 
               redesign of the $20 Federal Reserve note.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Put a Woman on the Twenty Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. SELECTION OF A PORTRAIT FOR THE $20 FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE.

    The Secretary of the Treasury shall make such arrangements as are 
necessary to convene a panel of United States citizens to solicit 
recommendations from the public for a portrait of a woman to be used in 
a redesign of the $20 Federal Reserve note. The panel shall submit a 
recommendation to the Secretary of the Treasury on a date determined by 
the Secretary.
                                 <all>
```