alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
GERALD SCHENCK, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

COMMISSIONER, 

of Social Security 

Administration, 

Defendant. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

Case No. 3:15-cv-00145-MC 

ORDER (EAJA FEES) 

Based upon the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that, pursuant to the 

Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, an attorney fee in the amount of $7,526.37 is 

awarded to Plaintiff. It is ordered that the aforementioned attorney fee will be paid to Plaintiffs 

attorney, dependent upon verification that Plaintiff has no debt which qualifies for offset against 

the awarded fees, pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as discussed in Astrue v. Ratlift 130 

S.Ct. 2521 (2010). If Plaintiff has no such debt, then the check shall be made payable to 

Plaintiffs attorney, Bruce Brewer, and mailed to Plaintiffs attorney's mailing address at 

PO Box 421, West Linn, OR 97068. If Plaintiff has such debt, then the check for any remaining 

1 - ORDER FOR EAJA FEES 

Case 3:15-cv-00145-MC Document 32 Filed 04/27/16 Page 1 of 2
funds after offset of the debt shall be made payable to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiffs attorney's 

mailing address stated above. There are no costs or expenses to be paid herein. 

-·~ .t:Jnri

1

DATED / this _.::__z:_ day of _ ___../_,_,. _____ , 2016. 

2 - ORDER FOR EAJA FEES 

\,,..----

) 

The Honorable Michael J. McShane 

United States District Court Judge 

Case 3:15-cv-00145-MC Document 32 Filed 04/27/16 Page 2 of 2
#### William P. HALEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. W. Randolph NICHOLS, Superintendent, Chesapeake Public Schools, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 06-2256.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 31, 2007.

Decided: June 4, 2007.

William P. Haley, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Jon Barry, David John Sullivan, *261Kaufman & Cañóles, PC, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William P. Haley appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Haley v. Nichols,*No. 2:06-cv-00361-RAJ (E.D. Va. Oct. 4 & 27, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Motions Granted , April 6, 2012 Order Withdrawn, and Order filed April 26 , 20 12

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 12

- 00121

- CV

____________ AGBOLADE O. ODUTAYO, Appellant

V.
JASPER EMERGENCY MEDICINE ASSOCIATES, P.A. and THE SCHUMACHER GROUP OF TEXAS, INC., Appellees

On Appeal from the 55th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011

- 01829



### O R D E R This is an appeal from two orders granting summary judgment signed August 1, 2011, and January 5, 2012. The clerk’s record was filed February 22, 2012. A reporter’s record from the hearing on appellant’s motion for new trial was filed March 27, 2012, by a substitute court reporter, Marijane Stomberg. A ppellant has notified this court in his docketing statement that the official court reporter, Gina Wilburn, had reported this case. Accordingly, on April 6, 2012, this court ordered Gina Wilburn to file the record in this case. On April 10, 2012, Gina Wi lburn advised this court that she did not report this caseand that the only record was reported by Marijane Stomberg. Accordingly, we

WITHDRAW the court’s order issued April 6, 2012, for Gina Wilburn to file the reporter’s record. O ur appellate record i s complete and appellant’s brief is due 30 days
after the record was filed.
On April 23, 2012, appellant filed an unopposed motion to substitute counsel Lee Van Richardson, Jr. for Anna Goodwin Ben n. The motion is GRANTED. Appellant also requested a 30

- d ay extension of time to file his brief. The motion is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief shall be due on or before May 29, 2012.

PER CURIAM
#### In the Matter of Brandon L., an Infant. Chautauqua County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Shu L., Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[945 NYS2d 587]

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Chautauqua County (Judith S. Claire, J.), entered April 27, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b. The order terminated the parental rights of respondent.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present — Centra, J.P., Fahey, Peradotto, Garni and Sconiers, JJ.
#### ALTSCHUL, Appellant, v. REHFELD, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

September, 1896.)

Action by Jacob Altschul against Augusta Rehfeld. H. Stiefel, for appellant. Cardoza Bros., for respondent.

No opinion. Affirmed upon argument.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Intelligroup, Inc, (the Company) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Vikram Gulati, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

|(1) | The Report   fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the   Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (16 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d); and      
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                         
|(2) | The   information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,   the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|DATE:  March 29, 2007 | By: | /s/                      
|--------------------- | --- | -------------------------
|                      |     |                          
|                      |     | Vikram   Gulati          
|                      |     | Chief   Executive Officer
WILBORN LAW OFFICE, P.C. 

TIM WILBORN, Attorney at Law - OSB # 944644 

tim@wilbornlaw.com 

P.O. Box 370578 

Las Vegas, NV 89137 

Voice: (702) 240-0184 

Fax: (503) 926-9133 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

UNITEDSTATESDIBTfilCTCOURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

SHERRI SPILLERS, Case No. 6: l 5-cv-490-JR 

Plaintiff, 

vs. ORDER 

COMMISSIONER of Social Security, 

Defendant. 

Attorney fees in the amount of $5,974.79 are hereby awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to the 

Equal Access To Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). Subject to any offset allowed under the Treasury 

Offset Program, payment of this award shall be made via check sent to Tim Wilborn's address: P.O. 

Box 3 70578, Las Vegas, NV 8913 7. In accordance with the fee assignment which Plaintiff has 

signed, payment shall be made in Tim Wilborn's name if no debt subject to offset exists. 

DATED this at"<lay of '1"~ , 2016. 

Submitted on June 12, 2016 by: 

s/ Tim Wilborn 

TIM WILBORN, OSB # 944644 

(7 02) 240-0184 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

ORDER - Page 1 

uM.~-~~ Court Judge 

Case 6:15-cv-00490-JR Document 24 Filed 06/27/16 Page 1 of 1
SEAHG RECOMMENDTIONS TO TWG ON THE 

SOCIOECONOMIC IMPLEMENTATION PLAN; FY 

2015/2016

Winter TWG Mtg. 

January 30, 2014
Areas of Proposed 2014 

Actions

 Review AMWG approved SE program proposals.  Characterize current ongoing market/nonmarket valuation programs in EIS/LTEMP and AMP 

processes

 Recommend SE projects to be pursued by the 

AMP for 2015/16 Biannual Plan
2014 SEAHG Members

 Leslie James, Jerry Myers, John Jordon, Clayton 

Palmer, Shane Capron, Jan Balsom, Jane Bird, Jenika Raub, Don Ostler, Jason Thiriot, Lucas Bair, David Garrett (Chair)
AMWG Approved SE 

Programs

Non-market workshop; evaluate information potential effectiveness and use; develop real time decision support methods Evaluate Tribal preference, social values; market/non-market values for resources valued by TribesAnalysis of recreation market values in CREEvaluate recreation non-market values in CRENon-market valuations of wilderness environmental resources and services in the CREMarket, non-market values of hydropower and wateDevelop SE Core Monitoring needs
SEAHG RECOMMENDED 

FY 2015/16 PROGRAMS

 FY 2015 Market/Non-market Workshop. Present 

program reviews and methods and evaluate AMP information use. Cost $8-10K, FY2015 funds. 

 FY 2014-2016 Assessment of CRE Recreation 

Economic Value and Regional Expenditures. Cost, $240K, FY2013/14 carry-over funds. 

 FY 2015-16 Evaluation of Decision Support 

Methods for AMP. Cost,$240-$300 K, 2015-2016 funds.
OVERVIEW OF SEAHG 

RECOMMENDED SE PROGRAMS  RECREATION
EIS/LTEMP Assessments of 

Environmental Resources /Recreation/Hydropower Values

 BOR program assessing market/non-market 

valuation

 Market assessments Non-market assessments NPS program assessing environmental services 

non-market valuations

 Non-market assessments Non-use assessments
CREDA, UCWU, WAPA 

Market/Non-market Valuations of Power and Water

 Power market valuations: CRSP System/WECC 

System(spillage effects)

 Power non-market valuations: Lit. 

assessment/expert panel

 Water market/non-market valuations: Lit. 

assessment/expert panel
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

            CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                          OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, the undersigned John Maxwell, President and Chief Executive Officer of
FIRSTPLUS Financial Group, Inc. (the "Company"), do hereby certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

      1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter
ended June 30, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

      Dated: August 17, 2007                    /s/ John Maxwell
                                                --------------------------------
                                                John Maxwell
                                                President and Chief
                                                Executive Officer
                                                Principal Executive Officer
```
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.9.1


                                       
        SCHEDULE OF AGREEMENTS OF PURCHASE AND SALE BY AND BETWEEN NEW
           YORK BAGEL ENTERPRISES, INC. AND COMMERCIAL EQUITY, INC.



AGREEMENT DATE
1.   October 21, 1997
2.   January 26, 1998


REAL PROPERTY LOCATION
1.   A.   Stillwater, Oklahoma
     B.   Springfield, Missouri
     C.   Lubbock, Texas
2.   A.   Temple, Texas
     B.   Midland, Texas


PURCHASE PRICE
1.   A.   $346,125
     B.   $425,000
     C.   $400,000
2.   A.   $400,000
     B.   $400,000










                                       1
# L_2009017EN.01000401.xml

| 22.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 17/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 17/4

---

COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 45/2009

of 18 December 2008

amending Regulation (EC) No 1339/2001 extending the effects of Regulation (EC) No 1338/2001 laying down measures necessary for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting to those Member States which have not adopted the euro as their single currency

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 308 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Central Bank,

Whereas:

| (1) | By Regulation (EC) No 1339/2001 (1) the application of Regulation (EC) No 1338/2001 (2) was extended to non-participating Member States as defined in Regulation (EC) No 974/98 of 3 May 1998 on the introduction of the euro (3). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By Regulation (EC) No 1339/2001 (1) the application of Regulation (EC) No 1338/2001 (2) was extended to non-participating Member States as defined in Regulation (EC) No 974/98 of 3 May 1998 on the introduction of the euro (3).

| (2) | Regulation (EC) No 1338/2001 has been amended by Regulation (EC) No 44/2009 (4). However, it is important that the euro should also be protected in those Member States which have not adopted it as their single currency and the necessary steps should be taken to that end, in compliance with the principle of proportionality. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Regulation (EC) No 1338/2001 has been amended by Regulation (EC) No 44/2009 (4). However, it is important that the euro should also be protected in those Member States which have not adopted it as their single currency and the necessary steps should be taken to that end, in compliance with the principle of proportionality.

| (3) | Regulation (EC) No 1339/2001 should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Regulation (EC) No 1339/2001 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1339/2001 shall be replaced by the following:

‘Article 1

The application of Articles 1 to 11 of Regulation (EC) No 1338/2001 as amended by Regulation (EC) No 44/2009 (*1) shall be extended to those Member States which have not adopted the euro as their single currency.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 December 2008.

For the Council

The President

M. BARNIER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 181, 4.7.2001, p. 11.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 181, 4.7.2001, p. 6.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 139, 11.5.1998, p. 1.

3

(4)  See page 1 of this Official Journal.

4

---
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Internet America, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, William E. Ladin, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ William E. Ladin, Jr.William E. Ladin, Jr.Chief Executive OfficerDate: February 17, 2004
0

255075

100125150175

Jan-01

Feb-01

Mar-01

Apr-01

May-01

Jun-01

Jul-01

Aug-01

Percent of Average

Green River B

a

sin

C

olorado River B

a

sin

San Juan River B

a

sin

Upper Colorado River Basin 2001 P
 Lake Powell Unregulated Inflow

Water year 2001

0

10,00020,00030,00040,00050,00060,000

01-Oct

01-Nov

01-Dec

01-Jan

01-Feb

01-Mar

01-Apr

01-May

01Jun

Cubic Feet Per Second2001 Observed

Average Unregulated

Water Year 2001 Lake Po

Unregulated Inflow
Glen Canyon Releases - 2001-2

Based on November 2001 Final Forecast

0

5000

10000150002000025000

Jan-01 Feb-01 Mar-01 Apr-01

May-01

Jun-01

Jul-01

Aug-01 Sep-01

Oct-01

Nov-01

Dec-01

Jan-02 Feb-02 Mar-02 Apr-02

Average CFS

Minimum Probable

Maximum Probable

Most Prob/Historical
Lake Powell Elevations - 2001-2

Based on November Final Forecast

3610362036303640365036603670368036903700

Jan-01

Feb-01

Mar-01

Apr-01

May-01

Jun-01

Jul-01

Aug-01

Sep-01

Oct-01

Nov-01

Dec-01

Jan-02

Feb-02

Mar-02

Apr-02

M02

Feet

Minimum Prob

Maximum Prob

Most Prob/Historical
FRYINGPAN RIVER NEAR IVANHOE LAKELatitude: 39.245Longitude: -106.531Elevation: None

FRYINGPAN RIVER NEAR IVANHOE LAKE

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Chapman Tunnel Site Page...



Chapman Tunnel

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Ivanhoe Site Page...



Ivanhoe

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Kiln Site Page...



Kiln

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Nast Lake Site Page...



Nast Lake
FY 18-20 Budget Update

Technical Work Group

April 23, 2018

Lee Traynham

Bureau of Reclamation

Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program 
GCDAMP Budget FY 18-20

GCDAMP Budget – Total from power revenues

FY 18 = $11,156,000 (2.2% CPI) 

Reclamation = $2,231,000 

GCMRC = $8,925,000 

FY 19 = $11,268,000 (1.0% CPI) 

Reclamation = $2,254,000

GCMRC = $9,014,000 

FY 20 = $11,381,000 (1.0% CPI)

Reclamation = $2,276,000

GCMRC = $9,106,000

2
3

AMWG and TWG

* Values adjusted to 2.2% CPI in FY18
Reclamation Administration

4

* Values adjusted to 2.2% CPI in FY18
Cultural Resources

5

* Values adjusted to 2.2% CPI in FY18
Totals

6

* Values adjusted to 2.2% CPI in FY18
GCDAMP Budget FY 18-20

Native Fish Conservation Contingency Fund

FY 18 = $1,600,000  $ 2,000,000*

FY 19 = $2,000,000  $ 2,400,000*

FY 20 = $2,400,000  $ 2,800,000*

* assumes little/ no use of Native Fish Conservation 

Contingency Fund during the respective FY

7
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 11.1

                              VIALOG Corporation
           Calculation of Shares Used in Determining Loss Per Share
                                  (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                Year Ended December 31,
                                                     -------------------------------------------
                                                        1998             1999            2000
                                                     ----------        ---------      ----------
<S>                                                   <C>              <C>             <C>
Common stock, beginning of period                     3,486,380        3,693,672       9,133,569
Weighted average common shares
  issued during period, net                             145,931        4,251,661         301,709
Common stock options and warrants
  using the treasury stock method                             -                -               -
                                                     ----------      -----------      ----------
                                                      3,632,311        7,945,333       9,435,278
                                                     ==========      ===========      ==========

Net loss (in thousands)                              $  (11,877)     $   (12,120)     $   (9,156)
                                                     ==========      ===========      ==========
Basic and diluted net loss per share                 $    (3.27)     $     (1.53)     $    (0.97)
                                                     ==========      ===========      ==========

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.03**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-77682, 33-53726, 333-02948, 333-57965, 333-37168, 333-106062,and 333-106064 on Form S-8, 333-65555 and 333-122084 on Form S-3, and 333-31618 on Form S-4, of our report dated March 14, 2005 relating to the financial statements of Premier Boxboard Limited, LLC , appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K ofCaraustar Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2004. 

 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

 

Atlanta, Georgia 

March 14, 2005
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT


TO
18 UNITED STATES C. §1350


(SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Novavax, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the fiscal period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Frederick W.
Driscoll, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:




1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the dates
and periods covered by this Report.





By:
              /s/ Frederick W.
DriscollVice
      President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer





Date:
November 8, 2010
[Cite as State ex rel. Adkins v. Dinovo, 2015-Ohio-473.]

COURT OF APPEALS 

DELAWARE COUNTY, OHIO 

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT 

STATE OF OHIO, ex rel. TRISTEN ADKINS 

 Relator 

-vsCINDY DINOVO, CLERK OF COURTS 

 Respondent 

JUDGES: 

Hon. William B. Hoffman, P. J. 

Hon. Sheila G. Farmer, J. 

Hon. John W. Wise, J. 

Case No. 14 CAD 08 0052 

O P I N I O N 

CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Petition for Writ of Mandamus 

JUDGMENT: Dismissed 

DATE OF JUDGMENT ENTRY: February 6, 2015 

APPEARANCES: 

For Relator For Respondent 

SAMUEL H. SHAMANSKY DARREN M. SHULMAN 

DONALD L. REGENSBURGER ATTORNEY FOR CITY OF DELAWARE 

COLIN E. PETERS 1 South Sandusky Street 

523 South Third Street Delaware, Ohio 43015 

Columbus, Ohio 43215 
Wise, J. 

{¶1}. Relator, Tristen Adkins, was charged with several felonies in the Delaware 

Municipal Court. The judge in that court set bond in the amount of $50,000.00 which 

was able to be met by posting ten percent or cash or surety. On August 25, 2014, 

Relator’s parents took $5,085.00 to the clerk of courts which represented ten percent of 

the $50,000.00 bond. The clerk, however, refused to accept the deposit. According to 

Relator, the clerk refused to accept the money because Relator’s parents did not satisfy 

additional financial requirements for the remaining $45,000.00. 

{¶2}. Relator has filed a Petition for Writ of Mandamus requesting this Court 

order Respondent to accept the deposit offered by Relator’s parents. Respondent has 

filed a motion to dismiss arguing the petition is now moot. 

{¶3}. On August 29, 2014, Relator was indicted by the grand jury. On that 

same date, the State moved to dismiss the municipal court case because the 

jurisdiction of the common pleas court was invoked by the filing of the indictment. The 

Delaware Municipal Court case was dismissed on August 29, 2014. 

{¶4}. Because the municipal case was dismissed after the instant petition was 

filed, this case has become moot. “[A] writ [of mandamus] will not lie in order to secure 

a determination of issues which have become moot pending consideration by the court 

of appeals. State, ex rel. Hawke v. Weygandt (1947), 148 Ohio St. 453, 456, 75 N.E.2d 

691 [36 O.O. 88]. See, also, State, ex rel. Warner & Swasey Co., v. Indus. Comm.

(1977), 50 Ohio St.2d 152, 363 N.E.2d 736 [4 O.O.3d 346].” State ex rel. Gantt v. 

Coleman, 6 Ohio St. 3d 5, 5, 450 N.E.2d 1163, 1164 (1983). 
{¶5}. Respondent no longer has the ability to accept the offered deposit 

because a pending case does not exist in Respondent’s court. We further note Relator 

has posted bond in the common pleas court case also making this petition moot. For 

these reasons, the motion to dismiss the petition as moot is granted. 

By: Wise, J. 

Hoffman, P. J., and 

Farmer, J., concur. 

JWW/ 0121