alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1997 AND THE RELATED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH
31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             735
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   57,543
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,326
<INVENTORY>                                      3,607
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                56,460
<PP&E>                                          65,032
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,526
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 136,534
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,224
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        43,098
<OTHER-SE>                                         (5)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   136,534
<SALES>                                        102,352
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               102,352
<CGS>                                           49,642
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   92,527
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,884<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,073
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,868
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,255
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,613
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,613
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.42
<FN>
<F1>OTHER EXPENSES ARE COMPRISED OF $1,584 RELATED TO MERGER COSTS INCURRED IN
CONNECTION WITH A POOLING TRANSACTION IN NOVEMBER 1996 AND $300 RELATED TO THE
WRITE-OFF OF DEFERRED OFFERING COSTS AS A RESULT OF THE CANCELLATION ON
DECEMBER 30, 1996 OF A REGISTRATION OF SHARES OF THE COMPANY'S COMMON STOCK.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 8, 2020

s0831

Order 

Clerk

September 8, 2020

160392 & (18)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 160392

COA: 349843

Wayne CC: 84-004264-FC

ANTHONY LEVELL HICKS, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 10, 2019 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the case of 

People v Manning (Docket No. 160034) is pending on appeal before this Court and that 

the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to 

appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in 

that case. The motion to consolidate is DENIED.
Development of a Budget 

Recommendation to the 

Adaptive Management Work Group

June 25, 2018
Triennial Budget and Work Plan Process1

1 Passed by TWG on 10/19/16
BAHG

• Leadership

• Co-chairs – Carlee Brown and Shane Capron 

• Roles and responsibilities

• “...will help Reclamation and GCMRC develop and bring to the TWG budgets 

that are prepared for full TWG discussion...”

• “Review and provide input on the initial budget spreadsheet and draft final 

budget spreadsheet and work plan...”

• “Provide recommendations to TWG at its spring and summer meetings.”

• “Review and make recommendations on annual budget and work plans to 

TWG.” 
Section 2.7 Criteria for Review and Revision

1. Scientific requirement or merit 

2. Administrative needs

3. New initiatives
Proposed Motion

• The TWG recommends that the AMWG recommend for approval to 

the Secretary of the Interior, the Fiscal Year 2019 budget as described 

in the attached budget worksheets.
November 8 , 2012



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

CARY EUGENE , Appellant
NO. 14

- 12

- 00026

- CR V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
#### State ex rel. Carlo D. Fabbozzi *v.*Helen E. Plumb, Town Clerk of Trumbull

House, C. J., Loiselle, MacDonald, Bogdanski and Longo, Js.

Argued January 9

decision released February 25, 1975

*William F. Gallagher,*with whom was *Anthony A. Piazza,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

*Arthur D. Friedman,*with whom was *Arthur Levy, Jr.,*for the appellee (defendant).

Per Curiam.

This appeal was taken from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas which denied the plaintiff’s petition for a writ of mandamus to require the defendant town clerk to issue certification of petitions for a referendum for a special election to approve or reject legislation adopted by the Trumbull town council.

The Trumbull town charter makes provision for such a referendum upon the filing with the town clerk of a petition signed by at least 10 percent of the electors requesting that “such specific legislative action” be submitted to a referendum, and that referendum petitions “need not contain the text of the specific measure sought to be rejected but the substance of such specific measure shall be set forth therein.” The charter also provides that each page *52of a petition shall contain a statement, signed under penalties of perjury by the person who circulated the same, containing the circulator’s name and address as well as further information and that “[a]ny page of a petition which does not contain such a statement by the circulator shall be invalid.”

The record discloses that on October 30,1972, the town council adopted two separate legislative acts. One appropriated funds for the construction of a central library building. Another appropriated funds for the construction of a golf course. The petitions submitted to the town clerk did not ask for a separate referendum on each of the two legislative acts but petitioned “that the action taken by the Trumbull Town Council on Monday, October 30, 1972 in appropriating the funding for the central library and the golf course in the amounts of $985,000 and $800,000, respectively, be placed on ballot for referendum to enable the electors to register an approval or disapproval of this action.” Furthermore, the petitions did not contain the required statement of the circulator.

The town clerk was authorized by the town charter to certify whether the petitions were “sufficient for the purpose intended.” She certified that they were not sufficient and the plaintiff in the present action sought a writ of mandamus ordering her to issue certification and submit “the measures” to a special election.

The court concluded that two separate and distinct legislative actions were improperly joined in a single petition, that the petition was invalid since it did not contain the certificate of the circulator, and that the plaintiff had failed to offer any evidence and thus failed to prove that there was a clear, legal *53duty owed to him which the defendant had failed to perform. It, accordingly, denied the petition for a writ of mandamus.

The record amply supports the findings and conclusions of the court.

There is no error.
# L_2009110EN.01000101.xml

| 1.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 110/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 110/1

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 358/2009

of 30 April 2009

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in particular Article 138(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 May 2009.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 April 2009.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.

2

---

ANNEX

Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

| (EUR/100 kg) |
| --- |
| CN code | Third country code (1) | Standard import value |
| 0702 00 00 | JO | 88,9 |
| MA | 82,6 |
| TN | 139,0 |
| TR | 120,1 |
| ZZ | 107,7 |
| 0707 00 05 | JO | 155,5 |
| MA | 32,7 |
| TR | 143,3 |
| ZZ | 110,5 |
| 0709 90 70 | JO | 216,7 |
| TR | 96,2 |
| ZZ | 156,5 |
| 0805 10 20 | EG | 45,0 |
| IL | 55,9 |
| MA | 49,7 |
| TN | 53,5 |
| TR | 54,0 |
| US | 51,9 |
| ZZ | 51,7 |
| 0805 50 10 | TR | 55,3 |
| ZA | 56,7 |
| ZZ | 56,0 |
| 0808 10 80 | AR | 83,6 |
| BR | 73,4 |
| CA | 114,7 |
| CL | 86,5 |
| CN | 96,9 |
| MK | 33,9 |
| NZ | 117,2 |
| US | 127,7 |
| UY | 71,7 |
| ZA | 79,5 |
| ZZ | 88,5 |

(EUR/100 kg)

CN code

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

0702 00 00

JO

88,9

MA

82,6

TN

139,0

TR

120,1

ZZ

107,7

0707 00 05

JO

155,5

MA

32,7

TR

143,3

ZZ

110,5

0709 90 70

JO

216,7

TR

96,2

ZZ

156,5

0805 10 20

EG

45,0

IL

55,9

MA

49,7

TN

53,5

TR

54,0

US

51,9

ZZ

51,7

0805 50 10

TR

55,3

ZA

56,7

ZZ

56,0

0808 10 80

AR

83,6

BR

73,4

CA

114,7

CL

86,5

CN

96,9

MK

33,9

NZ

117,2

US

127,7

UY

71,7

ZA

79,5

ZZ

88,5

---

(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
  ZZ
  ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

---
#### Arthur Edmundson, Jr. *v.*Miguel F. Rivera

*Edward F. Kunin,*for the plaintiff (appellant).

No appearance for the defendant (appellee).

Argued May 6

decided May 6, 1975

It appearing that the plaintiff in the above-entitled case has failed to prosecute his appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed unless the plaintiff files his brief on or before June 17, 1975.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET OF REGENT ASSISTED LIVING, INC. AS OF SEPTEMBER 30,
1997, AND THE RELATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS IN THE PERIOD
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       3,643,373
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  329,582
<ALLOWANCES>                                    27,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,241,464
<PP&E>                                      49,150,281
<DEPRECIATION>                                 451,040
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              56,588,888
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,481,157
<BONDS>                                     32,495,996
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       10,808,703
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,349,841
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,973,131)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                56,588,888
<SALES>                                     10,082,807
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,224,298
<CGS>                                        7,015,759
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,888,289
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             101,228
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,446,498)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (24,500)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,421,998)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,421,998)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.40)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2009240EN.01000101.xml

| 7.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 240/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 240/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5533 — Bertelsmann/KKR/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 240/01

On 8 September 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5533. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5533. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Livestock and Range Research Laboratory: Miles City, MT
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Public Notice
                        Recent Notices
                                    2024 School Tours
                    2024 Research Animal Sale On-line AuctionSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Miles City, Montana Livestock and Range Research Laboratory Docs







Businessheadline bar   **Collaborating Institutions**Montana State UniversityMontana Agricultural Experiment StationsMontana State Extension ServiceNew Mexico State UniversityWashington State University  USDA, ARS Fort Keogh Livestock and Range Research Laboratory  243 Fort Keogh Rd., Miles City, MT  59301  Phone: 406-874-8200, Fax:  406-874-8289


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FILED27 JAN'1610631JSDC·ORE 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

EUGENE DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 6:16-CR-44-AA 

Plaintiff, INFORMATION 

vs. 

Count 1: Theft of Government Property 

18 u.s.c. § 641 

DANIEL ALAN SPRATT, 

Defendant. 

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY CHARGES: 

COUNT 1 

(Theft of Government Property) 

On or about August 28, 2014, in the District of Oregon, defendant DANIEL ALAN 

SPRATT did unlawfully and knowingly steal and convert to his own use a thing of value of the 

United States Postal Service, an agency of the United States, that is, a United States Postal 

Service mail truck, valued at more than $1000; 

In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 641. 

Dated this 27th day of January 2016. 

Information 

BILLY J. WILLIAMS 

United States Attorney 

~~ Assistant United States Attorney 

Page 1 

Case 6:16-cr-00044-AA Document 29 Filed 01/27/16 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 31.1

Section 302 CEO Certification

I, Jack E. Stover, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Antares Pharma, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: May 4, 2006



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ JACK E. STOVER                   
|Jack E. Stover                       
|President and Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Form 6. Representation Statement

Instructions for this form: http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form06instructions.pdf

Appellant(s) (List each party filing the appeal, do not use “et al.” or other abbreviations.)

Name(s) of party/parties:

Name(s) of counsel (if any):

Address:

Telephone number(s):

Email(s):

Is counsel registered for Electronic Filing in the 9th Circuit? Yes No

Appellee(s) (List only the names of parties and counsel who will oppose you on appeal. List 

separately represented parties separately.) 

Name(s) of party/parties:

Name(s) of counsel (if any):

Address:

Telephone number(s):

Email(s):

To list additional parties and/or counsel, use next page.

Feedback or questions about this form? Email us at forms@ca9.uscourts.gov

Form 6 1 Rev. 12/01/2018

United States of America

Billy J. Williams 

Susanne Luse

1000 SW Third Ave., Suite 600, Portland Oregon 97204

503-727-1019

susanne.luse@usdoj.gov

John Eric Smith

Kelly Anderson

1730 E. McAndrews Road, Suite A, Medford, OR 97504

541-773-7000

kelly@andersonlaw.com

Case 1:16-cv-00690-CL Document 112 Filed 01/07/19 Page 1 of 2
Continued list of parties and counsel: (attach additional pages as necessary)

Feedback or questions about this form? Email us at forms@ca9.uscourts.gov

Appellants

Name(s) of party/parties:

Name(s) of counsel (if any):

Address:

Telephone number(s):

Email(s):

Is counsel registered for Electronic Filing in the 9th Circuit? Yes No

Appellees

Name(s) of party/parties:

Name(s) of counsel (if any):

Address:

Telephone number(s):

Email(s):

Name(s) of party/parties:

Name(s) of counsel (if any):

Address:

Telephone number(s):

Email(s):

Form 6 2 Rev. 12/01/2018

Case 1:16-cv-00690-CL Document 112 Filed 01/07/19 Page 2 of 2