alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed

September 20 , 2013.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 13

- 00807

- CV

IN RE SCHLUMBERGER T ECHNOLOGY CORP., Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 127th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011

- 23838



### MEMORANDUM OPINION
On September 13, 2013, relator Schlumberger Technology Corp. filed a petition for writ of m andamus in this c ourt. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §22.221;
see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this c ourt to order the Honorable R.K. Sandill, presiding judge of the 127th District Court of Harris County
, to (1) vacate its order dated August 19, 2013; (2) adopt a protocol for electronic discovery; and (3) compel certain discovery responses relating to net2

worth and unjust enrichment

. Relator also filed an emergency motion for temporary relief, asking this cour t to stay all proceedings in the trial court pending our ruling on the petition for writ of mandamus.
Relator has not established entitlement to the extraordinary relief of writ of mandamus. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and its emergency motion for temporary relief.

PER CURIAM
Panel Consists of Justices Frost, Boyce, and Jamison.
#### Continental Variety, Inc., Appellant, v Mark Bennett, Doing Business as Tokay Sales, Respondent.

— In an action to recover for goods sold and delivered, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Stolarik, J.), dated June 26, 1985, as, upon denying the plaintiff’s motion to compel the defendant to appear for an oral deposition, imposed "statutory motion costs of $20.00 upon the plaintiff’s attorney[s]” and directed the attorneys to provide their client with a copy of the court’s decision.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The notice of appeal was filed in the plaintiff’s name. However, that part of the order which is being appealed from directed the plaintiff’s attorneys to personally pay defendant costs of $20 and directed them to serve a copy of the court’s decision on the plaintiff. Clearly the plaintiff has not been aggrieved by that part of the order. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed *(see,*CPLR 5511).

It should be noted that in the recent case of *Wells v Community Hosp.*(120 AD2d 584) although the appellant attorney filed a notice of appeal in the plaintiff client’s name, this court declined to dismiss the appeal and instead treated the notice of appeal as valid "in the interest of justice”. However, in *Wells*the attorney had a meritorious appeal and this court reversed the order under review insofar as appealed from. On the contrary, in the instant case, the appeal, at the very best, borders on the frivolous and is without any merit. Therefore, there is no basis for declining to dismiss the appeal in the interest of justice. Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Weinstein and Spatt, JJ., concur.
#### Financial Structures Limited et al., Appellants, v UBS AG et al., Respondents.

[944 NYS2d 884]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara R. Kapnick, J.), entered February 17, 2012, which granted defendants’ motion to quash a subpoena served by plaintiffs on a nonparty seeking transcripts of deposi*434tion testimony of certain witnesses and related documents in a separate action brought against defendants, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court providently exercised its discretion in granting the motion, as plaintiffs failed to demonstrate that the information sought could not be obtained in the course of their own depositions of witnesses common to both actions *(see Menkes v Beth Abraham Servs.,*89 AD3d 647, 647-648 [2011]; *Connolly v Napoli, Kaiser & Bern, LLP,*81 AD3d 530, 531 [2011]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, DeGrasse, Freedman and Richter, JJ.
Exhibit 21

                           Integrated BioPharma, Inc.
                              List of Subsidiaries




InB:Manhattan Drug Company, Inc.
Gero Industries, Inc.-Inactive
Scientific Sports Nutrition, Inc. (f/k/a Media Consultants, Inc.)
Vitamin Factory, Inc.
Connaught Press, Inc.-Inactive
Designer Nutrition Labs, Inc.-Inactive
Liquifill, Inc.-Inactive
AgroLabs, Inc.
Bioscience Technologies, Inc.-Inactive
IHT Health Products, Inc.
IHT Properties, Inc.
InB:Biotechnologies, Inc. (f/k/a NuCycle Therapy, Inc.)
InB:Paxis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (f/k/a Paxis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.)
InB:Hauser Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. (f/k/a Hauser Technical Services, Inc.)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 USC SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of Medallion Financial Corp. (the Company) for the quarter ending September 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



|                                     |  |                   
|------------------------------------ |  | ------------------
|By:                                  |  | /s/ Alvin Murstein
|Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer

Date: November 7, 2012
EXHIBIT
31.1





CERTIFICATION Pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I,
E. Gerald Kay, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:1.     I have reviewed this
annual report on Form 10-K of Integrated BioPharma, Inc.;2.      Based on my
knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.     Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;4.     The registrant's other
certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a)     Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared; andb)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based
on such evaluation; andc)     Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
of directors:a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)     Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date:September
28, 2007



By:/s/
E. Gerald Kay

Name:
E. Gerald Kay

Title:
Chief Executive Officer
# STATEOFLOUISIANA



# COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 

### 2022 KW 0324 VERSUS ANDRE GRIFFIN AND TREVEON 

### MARCH 30, 2022 ROBINSON In Re: Andre Griffin and Treveon Robinson, applying for



### supervisory writs, 18th Judicial District Court, 

### Parish of Pointe Coupee, No. 

### 83, 365- F c/w 83, 666-F. BEFORE: McCLENDON, WELCH, AND THERIOT, JJ.

WRIT DENIED. STAY LIFTED. The 

### stay previously 

## issued by 

## this court in this matter is hereby lifted. JEW MRT McClendon, J., dissents. I would grant a 

### thirty - day continuance.

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT 

## dFAiUtY CLERK OF COUR

FOR THE COURT
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 USC SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of Medallion Financial Corp. (the Company) for the quarter ending June 30, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



|                     |  |                          
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------
|By:                  |  | /s/ Larry D. Hall        
|                     |  | Senior Vice President and
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer  
|                    
|Date: August 7, 2014
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 166 (Tuesday, August 31, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 48767]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-18758]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES


Advisory Committee on Civil Rules; Meeting of the Judicial 
Conference

AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States.

ACTION: Advisory Committee on Civil Rules; revised notice of open 
meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Advisory Committee on Civil Rules will hold a virtual 
meeting on October 5, 2021 rather than meeting in person. The meeting 
is open to the public. When a meeting is held virtually, members of the 
public may join by telephone or video conference to observe but not 
participate. An agenda and supporting materials will be posted at least 
7 days in advance of the meeting at: http://www.uscourts.gov/rules-policies/records-and-archives-rules-committees/agenda-books. The 
announcement for this meeting was previously published in the Federal 
Register on June 28, 2021.

DATES: October 5, 2021, 10 a.m. (Eastern).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Myers, Esq., Acting Chief 
Counsel, Rules Committee Staff, Administrative Office of the U.S. 
Courts, Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, One Columbus 
Circle NE, Suite 7-300, Washington, DC 20544, Phone (202) 502-1820, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#491b3c252c3a0a262424203d3d2c2c161a2c2a3b2c3d283b30092826673c3a2a263c3b3d3a672e263f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f5a780999086b69a98989c81819090aaa6909687908194878cb5949adb8086969a80878186db929a83">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2073.)

    Dated: August 26, 2021.
Shelly L. Cox,
Management Analyst, Rules Committee Staff.
[FR Doc. 2021-18758 Filed 8-30-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210-55-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1757 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1757

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an increasingly 
  larger earned income credit for families with more than 3 children.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 13, 2015

  Mr. Nadler introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an increasingly 
  larger earned income credit for families with more than 3 children.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Tax Fairness for All Families Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. INCREASED EARNED INCOME CREDIT FOR FAMILIES WITH MORE THAN 3 
              CHILDREN.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 32(b) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows:
            ``(1) Percentages.--For purposes of subsection (a)--

------------------------------------------------------------------------
 ``In the case of an eligible individual    The credit     The phaseout
                  with:                   percentage is:  percentage is:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 qualifying child......................           34.00           15.98
2 qualifying children...................           40.00           21.06
3 qualifying children...................           45.00           21.06
4 qualifying children...................           50.00           21.06
5 qualifying children...................           55.00           21.06
6 qualifying children...................           60.00           21.06
7 or more qualifying children...........           65.00           21.06
No qualifying children..................            7.65        7.65.''.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Paragraph (3) of section 32(b) of such 
Code is amended by striking subparagraph (A).
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2014.
                                 <all>
```
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Tropical Plant Genetic Resources and Disease Research: Hilo, HI
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Hilo, Hawaii Daniel K. Inouye U.S. Pacific Basin Agricultural Research Center Tropical Plant Genetic Resources and Disease Research People & Locations







Edward  Bufil
                        Tropical Plant Genetic Resources and Disease Research

                        




                        
                        Biological Science Technician (Plants)
                        Phone: (808) 959-5833
                        
                        
                        Fax: (808) 959-3539(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
GCDAMP & Other Meetings in 2024 

Days Dates Meeting Comments

JANUARY

W-Th Jan 3-4 CRAB meeting

W Jan UCLT all day

M Jan 15 Martin Luther King Holiday

T-W Jan 23-24 Annual Reporting Meeting – TBD

Th Jan 25 TWG Meeting – TBD

Tu-Th Jan 30-Feb 1 CRTR Meeting

FEBRUARY

Th Feb 15 MSCP Financial WG mtg

M Feb 19 President’s Day Holiday

Tu Feb 27 DOI Federal Family Meeting – HGI - Tempe

W-Th Feb 28-29 AMWG Meeting - Hilton Garden Inn - Tempe

MARCH

Sun Mar 10 Daylight Savings (begins)

M-F Mar 11-15 School Spring Recess in Flagstaff

Th Mar Flaming Gorge WG

APRIL

W-Th Apr 10-11 TWG Meeting – TBD

W Apr UCLT all day

W Apr MSCP Steering Committee meeting

MAY

W-Th May MSCP work group

W May 15 AMWG Webinar - Virtual

M May 27 Memorial Day Holiday

JUNE

M-F Jun 3-7 Salinity Forum and Advisory Council

W-Th Jun 12-13 TWG Meeting – TBD Looking at Twin Arrows

W Jun 14 Flag Day

W Jun 19 Juneteenth Holiday

W June MSCP Steering Committee meeting

JULY

Tu Jul 4 Independence Day Holiday

W Jul UCLT all day

AUGUST

Aug 7-9 NWRA meeting

M-F Aug 12-16 First week of school - Utah

Tu Aug 20 DOI Federal Family Meeting – GC South Rim

W-Th Aug 21-22 AMWG Meeting – Grand Canyon South Rim

M-F Aug Fall semester starts at NAU – Flagstaff, AZ
Days Dates Meeting Comments

SEPTEMBER

M Sep 4 Labor Day Holiday

OCTOBER

W-Th Oct 9-10 TWG Meeting – TBD 

W Oct 9 UCLT all day

M Oct 14 Columbus Day

M-F Oct 21-25 Salinity Forum & Advisory Council Mtgs

W Oct 25 MSCP Steering Committee meeting

NOVEMBER

Su Nov 3 Daylight Savings (ends)

Sa Nov 11 Veteran’s Day Holiday

Th Nov 23 Thanksgiving Holiday

DECEMBER

M Dec 25 Christmas Day Holiday
U.S. Department of the Interior

U.S. Geological Survey

Grand Canyon Monitorinand Research Center: Socioeconomic Studies Scott VanderKooi and Lucas BairSouthwest Biological Science CenterGrand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center
Triennial Budget and Workplan

 Project Element 13.1

 Economic Values of Recreational Resources along the 

River – Grand Canyon Whitewater Floater and Glen CaAngler Values

 Project Element 13.2

 Tribal Perspectives for and Values of Resources Down

Glen Canyon Dam

 Project Element 13.3

 Applied Decision Methods for the Glen Canyon Adaptiv

Management Program
Project Element 13.1

 Economic Values of Recreational Resources alo

Colorado River – Grand Canyon Whitewater FloaGlen Canyon Angler Values

 Federal Office of Management and Budget Review

 Final Federal Register notice (ended March 19, 2015) GCMRC responded to comments received during OMB 

 Survey implementation 2015

 Cooperation with AZGFD

 Creel survey underway to collect angler name and a

information

 Coordination with National Park Service

 Whitewater floater name and address information
Project Element 13.2

 Tribal Perspectives for and Values of Resources 

Downstream of Glen Canyon Dam

 Project discussion with Tribes to occur in fiscal year 20

 Project overview meeting with Tribal Representatives an

cooperators from the University of Montana occurred Fe

 Applied Decision Methods for the Glen Canyon A

Management Program

 Bioeconomic model identifying the economically prefer

management strategy for established nonnative fish, in humpback chub survival.

Project Element 13.3
Questions?
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-7059
BETTY J. CHAMBERLAIN, Petitioner - Appellant, v. GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:07-cv-00276-RAJ-JEB) Submitted: September 16, 2008 Decided: September 24, 2008 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Betty J. Chamberlain, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Eldridge Jeffrey, III, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Betty J. Chamberlain seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on her 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Chamberlain that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Chamberlain failed to object to the magistrate judge’s recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see alsoThomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 ( 1985). Chamberlain has waived appellate review by failing to timely file specific objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED