alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.4.2



AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE

VISUAL NETWORKS, INC.

2000 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN



W  I  T  N  E  S  S  E  T  H:



WHEREAS, Section 7(f) of the Visual Networks, Inc. 2000 Stock
Incentive Plan (the Plan) authorizes the Board of Directors (the Board) of Visual Networks, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Corporation), to amend the Plan at any time; and



WHEREAS, the Board now finds it desirable and in the best interests of
the Corporation to amend the Plan to reduce the number of shares of Common Stock by 2,775,000, so that the aggregate number of shares that may be issued under the Plan is 4,225,000.



NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended, effective as of April 21, 2004, as follows:



First and Only Change



The first sentence of Section 4 of the Plan is amended in its entirety to
read as follows:



Subject to adjustments
as provided in Section 7(d) of the Plan, the shares of Common Stock that may be issued on or after April 21, 2004, with respect to Awards granted under the Plan shall not exceed an aggregate of 4,225,000 shares of Common Stock.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Amendment No. 2 to
be executed by its duly authorized officer this 21st day of April, 2004.



|        |  |                       |  |                       |  |     |  |                       
|------- |  | --------------------- |  | --------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------
|ATTEST: |  |                       |  | VISUAL NETWORKS, INC.
|        |  |                       |  |                      
|By:     |  | /s/ Nancy A. Spangler |  |                       |  | By: |  | /s/ Lawrence S. Barker
|        |  |                       |  |                       |  |     |  |
#### Gloria Lim, Appellant, v Angel N. Flores et al., Respondents.

[946 NYS2d 183]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Adams, J.), entered August 2, 2011, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that she did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.

The defendants met their prima facie burden of showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345 [2002]; *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]; *Rodriguez v Huerfano,*46 AD3d 794, 795 [2007]). The plaintiff alleged that the subject automobile accident caused her to sustain injuries to her left shoulder and the cervical and lumbar regions of her spine. The defendants submitted competent medical evidence establishing, prima facie, that the alleged injuries to the plaintiffs left shoulder and cervical and lumbar regions of her spine did not constitute serious injuries within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). The defendants submitted, inter alia, the affirmed report of their examining orthopedist, who found no limitation in motion upon objective and quantitative range-of-motion testing of the plaintiff’s left shoulder and cervical and lumbar regions of her spine *(see Kearse v New York City Tr. Auth.,*16 AD3d 45 [2005]).

However, in opposition to the defendants’ prima facie showing, the plaintiff submitted competent evidence raising a triable issue of fact as to whether the alleged injuries to her left shoulder and to the cervical and lumbar regions of her spine consti*724tuted serious injuries within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) *(see Perl v Meher,*18 NY3d 208, 215-218 [2011]; *Seifeldin v Braick,*94 AD3d 857 [2012]; *Broughal v Moss,*94 AD3d 798 [2012]; *Torres v Ozel,*92 AD3d 770 [2012]).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have denied the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Angiolillo, J.P., Florio, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., concur.
PAGE 1— NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL AND CO-COUNSEL FOR JON 

RITZHEIMER

COHEN & COIT, P.C.

ANDREW D. COIT, OSB #972378

CHELSEA B. PAYMENT, OSB #141125

800 Willamette Street, Suite 700

Eugene, Oregon 97401

Ph: 541-685-1288

Fax: 541-653-8224

andrew@cohencoit.com

chelsea@cohencoit.com

Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

vs.

AMMON BUNDY,

JON RITZHEIMER,

JOSEPH O’SHAUGHNESSY,

RYAN PAYNE,

RYAN BUNDY,

BRIAN CAVALIER,

SHAWNA COX,

PETER SANTILLI,

 Defendants.

Case No.: 3:16-CR-00051-BR-2

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF 

COUNSEL AND CO-COUNSEL

FOR JON RITZHEIMER

Attorney ANDREW D. COIT (lead counsel) of the law firm of Cohen & 

Coit, P.C. is admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this Court and shall be

listed as counsel of record for Defendant, JON RITZHEIMER. Attorney 

CHELSEA B. PAYMENT (associate counsel) of the law firm of Cohen & Coit, 

P.C. is admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this Court, and is associating 

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 99 Filed 02/04/16 Page 1 of 3
PAGE 2— NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL AND CO-COUNSEL FOR JON 

RITZHEIMER

as co-counsel with ANDREW COIT (lead counsel), and shall also be listed as 

counsel of record for Defendant, JON RITZHEIMER. Mr. Ritzheimer and Ms. 

Payment have consented hereto.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 4th day of February, 2016.

COHEN & COIT, P.C.

/s/ Andrew D. Coit

ANDREW D. COIT, OSB #972378

CHELSEA B. PAYMENT, OSB #141125

Attorneys for Defendant, Ritzheimer

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 99 Filed 02/04/16 Page 2 of 3
PAGE 3— NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL AND CO-COUNSEL FOR JON 

RITZHEIMER

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that on the above-mentioned date, I electronically filed the 

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF System which will send 

notification of such filing to the following: 

Geoffrey A. Barrow

US Attorney’s Office, District of Oregon

1000 SW Third Avenue, Ste. 600

Portland, Oregon 97204

geoffrey.barrow@usdoj.gov

Ethan D. Knight

US Attorney’s Office, District of Oregon

1000 SW Third Avenue, Ste. 600

Portland, Oregon 97204

ethan.knight@usdoj.gov

Lisa Hay

Federal Public Defender’s Office

101 SW Main Street, Ste 1700

Portland, Oregon 97204

Lisa_hay@fd.org

Per C. Olson

Hoevet Olson Howes, PC

1000 SW Broadway Street, Ste. 1500

Portland, Oregon 97205

per@hoevetlaw.com

DATED this 4th day of February, 2016.

COHEN & COIT, P.C.

/s/ Andrew D. Coit

ANDREW D. COIT, OSB #972378

CHELSEA B. PAYMENT, OSB #141125

Attorneys for Defendant, Ritzheimer

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 99 Filed 02/04/16 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit
10.2


 


AMENDMENT
TO SEVERANCE AGREEMENT


 


THIS
AMENDMENT TO SEVERANCE AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into effective as of May 28,
2020 (the “Amendment Effective Date”), by and between PowerFleet, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),
and Ned Mavrommatis (“Executive” and, together with the Company, the “Parties”).


 


WHEREAS,
I.D. Systems, Inc. (“I.D. Systems”) and Executive entered into a Severance Agreement (the “Agreement”)
dated September 11, 2009;


 


WHEREAS,
effective as of October 3, 2019, I.D. Systems assigned to the Company all of I.D. Systems’ rights and obligations under
the Agreement and Executive consented to such assignment; and


 


WHEREAS,
effective as of May 31, 2020, Executive agreed to temporarily reduce his annual base salary from $300,000 to $255,000; and


 


WHEREAS,
in connection with such reduction in Executive’s annual base salary, the Parties desire to make certain amendments to the
Agreement.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency
of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:


 


1.
Section 2(a) of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:


 


“(a)
cash payments (collectively the “Severance Payment”) at the rate of Executive’s annual base salary as
in effect immediately prior to the Trigger Event for a period of 12 months (the “Severance Period”), payable
as set forth below; provided, however, that with respect to any Trigger Event that occurs in the 2020 calendar year, Executive’s
annual base salary shall be deemed to be $300,000. The Severance Payment shall be made as a series of separate payments in accordance
with the Company’s standard payroll practices (and subject to all applicable tax withholdings and deductions), commencing
with the first regular payroll date on or immediately following the 60th day after the date of the Trigger Event;”


 


2.
All terms and provisions of the Agreement not amended hereby shall remain in full force and effect. From and after the date
of this Amendment, all references to the term “Agreement” in this Amendment or the original Agreement shall
include the terms contained in this Amendment.


 


[Signature
page follows]


 




    	 	 	 



    	 	 	 



    

 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.


 


	 	POWERFLEET, INC.
	 	 	               
	 	By:	/s/ Chris Wolfe
	 	Name:	Chris Wolfe
	 	Title:	CEO


 


	 	EXECUTIVE:
	 	 
	 	/s/ Ned
    Mavrommatis 
	 	Ned
    Mavrommatis
#### State of Connecticut *v.*James Haskins

*John B. Williams,*special public defender, for the appellee (defendant).

*William F. Gallagher,*special assistant state’s attorney, for the appellant (state).

Argued May 9

decided May 9, 1975

The defendant’s motion to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County is denied.
Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program

Technical Work Group Meeting, Nov 7-8, 2023 

ACTION ITEMS, MOTIONS, and VOTES

NEW ACTION ITEMS

• Jeremy Hammen: Include a link to previous meeting Minutes and previous meeting Action Items 

when creating Agenda to make it easy for TWG members to review in advance. NOTE: This 

supersedes previous action to embed the Action Item link into the Meeting Minutes document.

• Bryce Mihalevich: For Jan meeting, present details on water quality modeling improvements

• Robert Radtke: For Jan meeting, create a slide on the Dibble temperature model using current 

month actual temp observations to predict next 12 months (not Jan 1 observations)

• Jeff Arnold: For Jan meeting, deep dive into effectiveness of Incentivized Harvest program for 

Brown Trout (population impact, cost to execute .vs other methods) See old action item below

• Bud Fazio: Provide an update on status of the “federal family” discussion for Slough modification 

at each meeting in calendar year 2024.

• Helen Fairly: In advance of Jan meeting, provide the LTEMP metrics report for review by TWG

OLD ACTION ITEMS – Still Open

• APRIL 2023: NPS to summarize the Incentivized Harvest Program and assess its 

effectiveness to remove fish as compared to mechanical removal. 

Tied to new action item for Jeff Arnold above, will close with that action item.

• APRIL 2023: WAPA requests that Reclamation makes the P&I team opinions more 

public for better sharing on their deliberations.

Action Item is being addressed but will remain open until process is implemented
Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program (GCDAMP) 

Glen Canyon Dam Technical Work Group (TWG) 

January 26, 2017 Meeting 

Committee Members/Alternates Present 

Melinda Arviso-Ciocco, Navajo Nation (phone) 

Jan Balsom, NPS/GRCA 

Cliff Barrett, UAMPS (phone) 

Charley Bulletts, Southern Paiute Consortium 

Chris Budwig, Int’l Federation of Fly Fishers/TU 

Shane Capron, WAPA 

Kerry Christensen, Hualapai Tribe 

Kevin Dahl, National Parks Conservation Assn. 

Bill Davis, CREDA 

Kurt Dongoske, Pueblo of Zuni 

Craig Ellsworth, WAPA 

Katrina Grantz, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation 

Paul Harms, State of New Mexico 

Brian Healy, NPS/GRCA 

Ken Hyde, NPS/GLNRA 

Vineetha Kartha, State of Arizona/TWG Vice-Chair 

Robert King, State of Utah (phone) 

Ryan Mann, Arizona Game & Fish Department 

Jessica Neuwerth, State of California 

Don Ostler, State of Wyoming 

Ben Reeder, Grand Canyon River Guides 

Peggy Roefer, UCRC/Nevada 

Dave Rogowski, Arizona Game & Fish Department 

Randy Seaholm State of Colorado 

Seth Shanahan, TWG Chair 

Larry Stevens, Grand Canyon Wildlands Council 

Michael Yeatts, Hopi Tribe 

Kirk Young, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 

Committee Members Absent 

Cliff Barrett, USAMPS (phone) Chip Lewis, Bureau of Indian Affairs 

Chris Harris, State of California Steve Wolff, State of Wyoming 

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and 

Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center (GCRMC) Staff 

Lucas Bair, Economist Mike Moran, Deputy Chief, GCMRC 

Helen Fairley, Program Manager Joe Sankey, Research Scientist 

Kyrie Fry, Communication Scott VanderKooi, Center Director 

Interested Persons, TWG Members and Alternates 

Simone Athayde, University of Florida 

David Braun, Science Advisors Exec. Coordinator 

Jane Bryant, Arizona Game & Fish Department 

Winkie Cook, Hualapai Tribe 

Jennifer Crandell, State of Nevada 

Marianne Crawford, Bureau of Reclamation 

Craig Ellsworth, WAPA 

Leslie James, CREDA 

John Jordan, Federation of Fly Fishers/TU 

Dawn Hubbs, Hualapai Tribe 

Josh Korman, Cooperator 

Joe Miller, Federation of Fly Fishers/TU 

Theresa Pasqual, DOI Federal Tribal Liaison 

Sarah Rinkevich, DOI Federal Liaison 

Brian Sadler, WAPA 

Randy Seaholm, State of Colorado 

Simone Athayde, University of Florida 

Rod Smith, DOI Solicitor’s Office 

Bob Unnasch, Sound Science LLC 

Chris Watt, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation
Glen Canyon Dam Technical Work Group Meeting 

August 2-3, 2006 

List of Attachments

No. Subject Author / Presenter 

1 Action Items Tracking Report 

2 Memo from Mark Limbaugh to the AMWG dated June 16, 

2006 

Dave Garrett 

3 Organic Drift Studies during Fall 2005 PPT Ted Kennedy 

4 Nearshore Water Temperature Measurements and 

Monitoring PPT 

Craig Anderson 

5 Nearshore Biological Sampling During Fluctuating and 

Steady Releases in September and October 2005 PPT 

Barbara Ralston 

6 Recent findings related to YOY trout survival in the Glen 

Canyon Reach 

Josh Korman 

7 Water Temperature Modeling Update Scott Wright (via phone)

8 Sand Transport during steady and low fluctuating flows in 

September/October 2005 

Scott Wright (via phone)

9 Discussion of FY 2007 Hydrograph Outline John Hamill 

10 Letter from Grand Canyon Trust to Mark Limbaugh Rick Johnson 

11a 

11b 

11c 

11d 

Draft Monitoring and Research Plan 

MRP PowerPoint presentation 

SPG Progress Report on Cooperative Science Planning 

Activities with the Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research 

Center 

FY07 Archeological Site Assessment Plan 

John Hamill 

Dave Garrett 

Mary Barger 

12a 

12b 

Press Release and USGS Fact Sheet: Endangered 

Humpback Chub Population in Grand Canyon Stabilizing 

DOI News Release dated Aug. 3, 2006: Assistant Secretary 

Limbaugh Comments on USGS Finding on Endangered 

Humpback Chub Population in Grand Canyon 

John Hamill 

13 Mapping Submerged Aquatic Vegetation in Glen Canyon 

Using Hydroacoustics - a Proof of Concept PPT 

Ted Kennedy 

14a 

14b 

Vegetation Monitoring Update PPT 

Project BIO 6.R1.07: Vegetation Mapping: large scale 

change detection on the effects of dam operations on 

vegetation and Project BIO 6.R2.07: Vegetation Transects: 

local scale and annual monitoring of vegetation cover and 

species diversity as related to dam operations 

Barbara Ralston 

15 FY 2007 Ancillary Projects Dennis Kubly 

16 Update on In-Canyon HBC Translocation in Grand Canyon 

National Park 

Larry Stevens 

17a 

17b 

FY 2007 AMP Budget and Workplan 

FY 2007 Budget spreadsheet 

John Hamill 

Dennis Kubly 

18 TWG Chair Report to the Adaptive Management Work Group 

On Actions Taken by the Technical Work Group at their 

August 2-3, 2006, Meeting 

Kurt Dongoske 

19 TWG Chair Report to the Secretary’s Designee and the 

Adaptive Management Work Group Concerning the Results 

of a Technical Work Group Teleconference Call dated 

October 6, 2006 

Kurt Dongoske
INDUSTRI-MATEMATIK INTERNATIONAL CORP.

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES AT APRIL 30, 1997

AUSTRALIA
Industri - Matematik Pty Ltd

GERMANY
Industri - Matematik GmbH

THE NETHERLANDS
Industri - Matematik Nederland B.V.

SWEDEN
Ceratina International AB
Ceratina Systems AB
Industri - Matematik AB
Industri - Matematik Data Goteborg AB
Industri - Matematik Data Stockholm AB
Industri - Matematik Datasystem AB
Industri - Matematik Ekonomi AB
Industri - Matematik Intressenter AB
Industri - Matematik Projektledning AB
Industri - Matematik Samarbetspartner AB
Industri - Matematik System Goteborg AB
Industri - Matematik System Stockholm AB

UNITED KINGDOM (1)
Enterprise Management System Limited (England and Wales)
Industri - Matematik Limited (England and Wales)

UNITED STATES (1)
Industri - Matematik Corp. (Delaware)
Industri - Matematik Licensing Corp. (Delaware)
Industri - Matematik North American Operations, Inc. (Delaware)
International Technology Group, Inc. (New Jersey) dba IMI Services
Software Finance Corp. (Delaware)
Software Research Corp. (Florida)
- ----------------------
(1)   Country or state of incorporation is indicated in parentheses.
# C_2009081EN.01000201.xml

| 4.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 81/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 81/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5485 — Altor Fund III/Carnegie/Max Matthiessen)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 81/03

On 31 March 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5485. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5485. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Adam Wasserman, the Chief Financial Officer of Colmena Corp., certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Colmena
Corp.

         2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

         5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

         a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

         6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in
this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: February 20, 2004
/s/ Adam Wasserman
-----------------------------------------
Adam Wasserman, Chief Financial Officer




<PAGE>
#### Kenneth M. Schlau, Jr., Appellant, v City of Buffalo et al., Defendants, and Frey Electric Construction Co., Inc., Respondent.

(Appeal No. 3.)

[946 NYS2d 526]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Diane Y. Devlin, J.), entered December 7, 2011 in a personal injury action. The order denied plaintiffs motion for leave to renew and reargue his opposition to the summary judgment motion of defendant Frey Electric Construction Co., Inc.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed *1591without costs (see *Braitman v Minicucci & Grenga*[appeal No. 1], 272 AD2d 875 [2000]). Present — Smith, J.P., Fahey, Peradotto, Sconiers and Martoche, JJ.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, the undersigned Jack (J.D.) Draper, President and Chief Executive Officer of FIRSTPLUS Financial Group, Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: 

 

1.             The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

| Dated: August 14, 2006 | /s/ Jack (J.D.) Draper |
|------------------------|------------------------|

Jack (J.D.) Draper

President and Chief Executive Officer

Principal Accounting Officer