alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.12


 


PROMISSORY
NOTE


 


	Principal
    Amount $US 5,000.00	Burbank,
        California

        October
        15, 2018



 


FOR
VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Imaging3,Inc,
a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of California, and having an office and principal place of business
at 3022 North Hollywood Way, Burbank, California (hereinafter called “Borrower”) promises to pay to the order of Daniel
C. Tronson, an individual whose address is 1902 Via Justino, San Dimas, CA, 91773 (the “Lender”), the principal amount
of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000) on or before the earlier of the Borrower funding the a private placement of its common stock
in the amount of $250,000.00 (the “Private Placement”) or November 15, 2018 (the “Maturity Date”).


 


1.
INTEREST RATE. The interest rate shall be 2% from the date of this Note to
the Maturity Date.


 


2.
REPAYMENT. The parties hereto agree that at the time of repayment, Borrower
will pay Lender eleven thousand dollars ($5,500), reflecting $5,000 in principle and $500 in a fee. At the discretion of the Lender,
the principal plus accrued interest may be repaid in cash or the note may be convertible into common shares (up to 100% of the
note at $0.05/share)..


 


3.
GOVERNING LAW. This Note and its interpretation, construction, validity and
enforceability shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. No interpretation or construction shall, however, be
adverse to or decided against the Lender with respect to any unclear or ambiguous terms or provisions of this Note based on same
having been drafted by the Lender’s counsel.


 


4.
ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Note constitutes the entire understanding between Borrower,
and Lender and to the extent that any writings not signed by Lender or oral statements or conversations at any time made or had
shall be inconsistent with the provisions of this Note and the other Loan Documents, the terms of this Note shall prevail.


 


PRIOR
TO SIGNING THIS NOTE, BORROWER HAS READ AND UNDERSTOOD ALL THE PROVISIONS OF THIS NOTE. BORROWER AGREES TO THE TERMS OF THIS NOTE
AND ACKNOWLEDGES RECEIPT OF A COMPLETED COPY OF THIS NOTE.


 


	 	Imaging3,
    Inc.
	 	 
	 	/s/
    John Hollister
	 	By
    John Hollister, CEO, Director


 




    	1



     


    

 


Wiring
Instructions:


 


East
West Bank


135
N. Los Robles Ave


Pasadena,
California 91101


ABA#
322070381


Acct#
5500000148


Attn:
Imaging3, Inc.


 






    	2
EX-4.3





 Exhibit 4.3 

TOTAL CAPITAL INTERNATIONAL 

Officer’s Certificate 

Pursuant to Section 102 of the Indenture 

Total Finance Corporate Services Limited, a United Kingdom limited company (“TFCS”) and a duly appointed Director
(Administrateur) of Total Capital International, a société anonyme duly organized and existing under the laws of the Republic of France, registered with the Registre du Commerce et des Sociétés of
Nanterre under number 479 858 854 (the “Company”), hereby makes the following statements pursuant to Section 102 of the indenture dated February 17, 2012, and amended by the supplemental indenture dated
February 19, 2019 and as further amended by the third supplemental indenture dated May 29, 2020, among the Company, TOTAL S.A. and The Bank of New York Mellon, acting through its London Branch, as trustee (the “Indenture”): 

(a)    the undersigned has read the provisions of the Indenture, including without limitation, Sections 201, 301, 901 (7) and 901 (10)
setting forth the covenants and conditions relating to the authentication and delivery of the Notes and the execution and delivery of the Third Supplemental Indenture and in respect of compliance with which this certificate is being delivered, and
the definitions in the Indenture relating thereto; 
 (b)    the undersigned has examined the resolutions of the Board of Directors of
the Company, such other corporate records of the Company, and such other documents deemed necessary as a basis for the opinion hereinafter expressed; 

(c)    in the opinion of the undersigned, such examination is sufficient to enable it to express an informed opinion as to whether or not
the covenants and conditions referred to above have been complied with; and 
 (d)    the undersigned is of the opinion that such
covenants and conditions have been complied with. 
 Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings
given to them in the Indenture. 












 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed and delivered this certificate as of
the date set forth below. 
  

							
	Dated: May 29, 2020	 		 	TOTAL FINANCE CORPORATE SERVICES LIMITED
				
		 		 	By:	 	/s/ ANTOINE LARENAUDIE
		 		 	Name:	 	Antoine Larenaudie
		 		 	Title:	 	Authorized Signatory

 [Signature Page to Officer’s Certificate under the Indenture]
#### LANGWORTHY, Respondent, v. CRESSEY, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fifth Department.

December 28, 1895.)

Action by John R. Langworthy against Elverton B. Cressey.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed. WARD, J., not sitting. For decision at special term, see 31 N. Y. Supp. 85.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Power Sports Factory, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steve
Rubakh, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/
      Steve RubakhSteve
      RubakhChief
      Financial OfficerMay
      20, 2009
#### In the Matter of Charlene H. Fuller, Respondent, v William H. Walker, Respondent. Michele E. DeTraglia, Esq., Attorney for the Child, Appellant.

[948 NYS2d 841]

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oneida County (Joan E. Shkane, J), entered August 9, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, adjudged that the parties have split custody of the subject child.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present — Scudder, P.J., Smith, Carni, Lindley and Martoche, JJ.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-10114 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MARIO ALBERTO CORONA-SOLORZANO, also known as Gustavo Noe Luna-Torres, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:03-CR-210-2-Y

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Mario Alberto Corona-Solorzano concedes that the arguments raised are foreclosed by circuit precedent but seeks to preserve them for further review. The Government has moved for summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. The motion is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## F I L E D August 18, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                        Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the inclusion of our report dated April 18, 1997 with respect to
the audited combined financial statements of Educational Management, Inc. and
Wilkert and Rhude, general partnership, as of December 31, 1996 and 1995 and
for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996, our reports
dated May 16, 1997 with respect to the balance sheet of Nebraska College of
Business (a division of Nebraska Acquisition Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary
of Quest Education Corporation f/k/a Educational Medical, Inc.) as of March 31,
1997 and the balance sheet of Lincoln School of Commerce (a division of Nebraska
Acquisition Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Quest Education Corporation
f/k/a Educational Medical, Inc.) as of March 31, 1997 in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for Quest Education Corporation for the year ended March 31, 2000 and
to the incorporation by reference of such report in the Registration Statements
on Form S-3 No. 333-33025, Form S-3 No. 333-45707 Form S-3 No. 333-54251 and
Form S-8 No. 333-32809 and related prospectuses of Quest Education Corporation.


                                             /s/ Winther, Stave & Co., LLP


Spencer, Iowa
June 23, 2000
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Altair Nanotechnologies Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, John Fallini, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:





(a)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(b)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








/s/  John Fallini


John
Fallini


Chief
Financial Officer


March 12,
2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2000
and the consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2000 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             515
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,625
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,374
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,185
<PP&E>                                          18,149
<DEPRECIATION>                                (12,310)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  67,224
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,042
<BONDS>                                            729
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,380
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    67,224
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               118,769
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   92,131
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,170
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,853
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,637)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (655)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (982)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (982)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.13)


</TABLE>
# L_2009168DE.01005601.xml

| 30.6.2009 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 168/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2009

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 168/56

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 379/2009 der Kommission vom 8. Mai 2009 zur Zulassung eines neuen Verwendungszwecks von 6-Phytase EC 3.1.3.26 als Futtermittelzusatzstoff für Masthühner, Masttruthühner, Legehennen, Mastenten, Ferkel (abgesetzt), Mastschweine und Säue (Zulassungsinhaber: Danisco Animal Nutrition, Rechtsträger: Danisco (UK) Limited)

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 116 vom 9. Mai 2009
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 116 vom 9. Mai 2009

Im Inhalt, auf Seite 6 im Titel und in den Erwägungsgründen 3, 4 und 5 sowie auf Seite 8 in den Spalten 5 und 9 des Anhangs:

anstatt:

„Säue“

muss es heißen:

„Sauen“.

Seite 8, im Anhang, Spalte 3 und Spalte 4:

anstatt:

„6 Phytase“

muss es heißen:

„6-Phytase“.

Seite 8, im Anhang, Spalte 4 zweite Zeile:

anstatt

„Zubereitung 6 Phytase ...“

muss es heißen:

„Zubereitung von 6-Phytase ...“.

Seite 8, im Anhang, Spalte 4 fünfte Zeile:

anstatt

„gecoated“

muss es heißen:

„gecoatet“.

---
Exhibit 14











CONSENT OF SGS LAKEFIELD RESEARCH LTD.





Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the Annual Report) of Cumberland Resources Ltd. (the Company), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.



We hereby consent to the references to our name under the heading Narrative Description of Business -- Meadowbank Gold Project, Nunavut Territory, Canada in the Companys Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2005 which is included as part of the Annual Report, and to all other references to our name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report.







SGS Lakefield Research Ltd.





By:

/s/ Steve Williams



Name:

Steve Williams

Title:

Vice President, Metallurgy Business Development





March 22, 2006
# L_2012326EN.01005501.xml

| 24.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 326/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 326/55

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision 2009/1017/EU of 22 December 2009 on the granting of State aid by the authorities of the Republic of Hungary for the purchase of agricultural land between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2013

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 348 of 29 December 2009
  )

On Page 55, recital 6, second indent, second phrase:

for:

‘The grant may be allocated to a private person who, on the date of purchase, was involved in an agricultural activity as the owner of at least 5 hectares of plantations or 1 hectare of other agricultural land...’

read:

‘The grant may be allocated to a private person who, on the date of purchase, was involved in an agricultural activity as the owner of at least 0,5 hectares of plantations or 1 hectare of other agricultural land...’.

---
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 19

- 00687

- CR

Dylan Shane Caad, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 207TH DISTR ICT COURT OF COMAL C OUNTY NO. CR2012

- 502, THE HONORABLE R. BRUCE B OYER, JUDGE PRESIDIN G

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s brief on appeal was originally due November 22, 2019 . On counsel’s

motio ns , the time for filing was extended to February 21, 2020 . Appellant’s counsel has now

filed a fourth motion, requesting that the Court extend the tim e for filing appellant’s brief. We

grant the motion for extension of time and order appellant to file a brief no later than March 23,

2020. No further extension of time will be granted and failure to comply with this order will

result in the referral of th is case to the trial court for a hearing under Rule 38.8(b) of the Texas

Rules of Appellate Procedure.

It is ordered on March 1 0 , 2020

.

Before Chief Justice Rose

, Justices Baker and Triana

Do Not Publish
Glen Canyon Dam Technical Work Group Meeting

February 2, 2012

List of Attachments

No. Attachment Presenter / Author

1 Action Item Tracking Report

2 Final Biological Opinion on the Operation of Glen Canyon Dam Including High 

Flow Experiments and Non-Native Fish Control Memo Glen Knowles

3a Ad Hoc Group Update Report

3b Order No. 3317, Subject: Department of the Interior Policy on Consultation with Shane Capron

Tribes

4a Humpback Chub 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation

Pam Sponholtz

4b Discussion Paper, Western Concerns with the Humpback Chub 5-Year Status 

Review

4c U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Response to Western’s concerns over the 

Humpback Chub 5-year Review

4d USFWS Humpback Chub 5-year Review PPT 

5a GCDAMP Biennial Budget Process Approved by the AMWG on May 6, 2010 Shane Capron 5b Status Review PPT

5c Executive Summaries from the High-Flow Experiment EA and the Non-Native Fish 

Control EA) Glen Knowles 5d Excerpts from the Dec. 23, 2011 Final Biological Opinion on the Operation of Glen 

Canyon Dam including High Flow Experiments and Non-native Fish Control

5e GCMRC budget information (breakdown in work percentages) PPT Jack Schmidt

6 Recommended Information Needs and Program Elements for a Proposed AMP 

Socioeconomic Program and PPT Dave Garrett

7 AIF: FY2013 Hydrograph (from AMWG 8/2011 meeting) Glen Knowles

8 A Research and Monitoring Plan for Evaluating Trout Management Flows Below 

Glen Canyon Dam and PPT Craig Ellsworth

9 Meeting Notes from Budget Ad Hoc Group Conference Call on Feb. 14, 2012 Shane Capron
NO. 07-12-0185-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL C JULY 13, 2012

__________________ ____________ MIGUEL R. LOPEZ, Appellant

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________ _____________ FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF DEAF SMITH COUNTY; NO. 2011-00219; HON. TO M SIMONS, PRESIDING

__________________ _____________ On Motion to Dismiss

__________________ _____________ Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. Appellant Miguel R. Lopez, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal, signed by appellant, because he no longer desires to prosecute it. Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant = s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

Do not publish. Per Curiam
#### MORRIS MECHANICAL ENTERPRISES, INC., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 83-1903.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Nov. 26, 1984.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Denied.
Exhibit 23.2
                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-5570-LA and No. 333-43899 on Form S-3 and Form S-8, respectively, and in
Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-50385 on Form S-3 of our
report dated March 27, 1998 appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of
Bristol Retail Solutions, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1997.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
----------------------------------------------
Costa Mesa, California
June 10, 1998
---

---

EXHIBIT 13.(a).1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Blue Square-Israel Ltd. (the Company) on
Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby
certify that to the best of our knowledge:

1.    
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: June 29, 2005 |  | BY: /s/ Gil Unger
Gil UngerChief Executive Officer
|------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------

|Date: June 29, 2005 |  | BY: /s/ Emanuel Avner
Emanuel AvnerChief Financial Officer
|------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ernest Elmore, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Groh, J.), both rendered September 7, 1982, convicting him of robbery in the second degree (one count under each indictment), upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Weinstein, Kunzeman and Spatt, JJ., concur.