alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Range Management Research: Las Cruces, NM
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Comprehensive Publications
                    Research SummarySearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Las Cruces, New Mexico Range Management Research Docs





- Landscape Toolbox
- Long Term Agricultural Research
- EcoTrends
- Long Term Ecological Research
- Ecological Site Descriptions
- Monitoring & Assessment
- Southwest Climate Hub
- Land Potential Knowledge System
- National Ecological Observatory Network
- JournalMap
- Assessment, Inventory, and Monitoring (AIM)
- Data Catalogs

What is needed to 'state map'?headline bar


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
# C_2006246EN.01000601.xml

| 13.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/6

---

Amendment by France of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services between Strasbourg and Vienna

(2006/C 246/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

| 1. | France has decided to amend, with effect from 25 March 2007, the public service obligation imposed on scheduled air services between Strasbourg and Vienna published in the
  Official Journal of the European Communities No C 257 of 25 October 2003 pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 of 23 July 1992 on access for Community air carriers to intra-Community air routes. |
| --- | --- |

1.

France has decided to amend, with effect from 25 March 2007, the public service obligation imposed on scheduled air services between Strasbourg and Vienna published in the
  Official Journal of the European Communities No C 257 of 25 October 2003 pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 of 23 July 1992 on access for Community air carriers to intra-Community air routes.

Official Journal of the European Communities

2.   The public service obligation is as follows:

2.1.   Frequency

The minimum level of service provided between Strasbourg and Vienna must be two round trips per day from Monday to Friday, all year round except for the month of August, when there must be a minimum of one round trip per day, from Monday to Friday. The flights in question must be non-stop.

2.2.   Type of aircraft used and minimum capacity provided

The services must be operated by aircraft with at least 25 seats.

2.3.   Timetables

The first flight in the day departing from Vienna must leave at a time that enables flights from other European countries to connect.

The timetable must coincide with parliamentary sessions, i.e. arriving at Strasbourg close to but no later than 14:00 for the session beginning at 15:00 and leaving Strasbourg close to but no earlier than 17:00, when the sessions end.

The two daily rotations must enable passengers to make a return trip in one day.

2.4.   Flight bookings

Seats on these flights must be marketed by a computerised booking system.

2.5.   Continuity of service

Except in cases of force majeure, the number of flights cancelled for reasons directly attributable to the carrier must not exceed 2 % of the number of flights scheduled in any IATA scheduling season. The carrier must give a minimum of six months' notice before discontinuing these services.

Community carriers are hereby informed that the operation of air services without regard to the abovementioned public service obligation may result in administrative and/or criminal penalties.

---
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.




SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF




THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of
Intelligroup, Inc, (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, Alok Bajpai, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and to the best of my knowledge and belief,
that:




(1)
            
            The Report
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d);)
      and(2)
            
            The information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.


DATE: March 29, 2010
            By: /s/
            ALOK
  BAJPAIAlok BajpaiChief Financial
  Officer


---
#### FLEISCHMAN, Appellant, v. SMITH, Respondent. SMITH, Respondent, v. FLEISCHMAN et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

December 22, 1896.)

Actions by Joseph Fleischman against Jeremiah T. Smith, and by Jeremiah T. Smith against Joseph Fleischman and others. A. H. Parkhurst, for appellants. C. N. Bovee, Jr., for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
~	1	~	

May	14,	2014	Hydrology	Summary	

Snow water equivalent (SWE) as of May 14, 2014, for the Upper Green River and Yampa/White River

Basins are 176 and 137 percent of median, respectively.  Flaming Gorge SWE is similar to 1996 and

Deerlodge SWE is similar to 1998 as shown in Figures 1 and 2 below.  The May final forecast April‐July

unregulated inflow volume for Flaming Gorge Reservoir is 1,320 kaf and the Yampa River at Deerlodge is

1,550 kaf, placing Flaming Gorge in the average hydrologic classification.  No revisions exist to Flaming

Gorge operations, both spring peak and base flows, in the 24‐month study.  The May midmonth forecast

is scheduled to be distributed on May 19, 2014.

I will reference my Flaming Gorge Update emails to provide updates on the current weather forecasts

from the CBRFC.   

FIGURE 1—Upper Green River Basin Snotel Tracking.  1981‐2010 percent of median compared against 2014 YTD

Snow Water Equivalent (SWE) and 1996 percent of average SWE

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

Index Snow Water Equivelent

Month

Upper Green River Basin Snotel Tracking

Aggregate of 18 Snotel Sites above Flaming Gorge Reservoir

Statistical Median Index Current Year Index WY2014 Comparison Year Index WY1996

As of 05/14/2014 with 18 of 18 

sites reporting, the basin wide 

SWE is 176 percent of median.

Data Provided by the Natural Resource Conservation Service
~	2	~	

FIGURE 2‐ Upper Yampa River Basin Snotel Tracking. 1981‐2010 percent of median compared against 2014 YTD

Snow Water Equivalent (SWE) and 1998 percent of median SWE  

FIGURE 3—Yampa River at Deerlodge One Week Chances of Exceeding River Levels as of May 12, 2014

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Index Snow Water Equivelent

Month

Upper Yampa River Basin Snotel Tracking

Aggregate of 16 Snotel Sites above Green River Confluence

Statistical Median Index Current Year Index WY2014 Comparison Year Index WY1998

As of 05/14/2014 with 14 of 16 

sites reporting, the basin wide 

SWE is 137 percent of median.

Data Provided by the Natural Resource Conservation Service
734 A.2d 1286

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Peter Finch COTTREL, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Submitted Aug. 11, 1999.

Decided Sept. 9, 1999.

Joseph C. Madenspacher, Dist. Atty., Susan E. Moyer, Asst. Dist. Atty., District Attorney’s Office, for Com.

James J. Karl, Chief Public Defender, Lyn Bailey, Asst. Public Defender, Public Defender’s Office, for Peter Finch Cottrel.

Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN and SAYLOR, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Based upon our disposition in *Commonwealth v.*Williams, 557 Pa. 285, 733 A.2d 593 (1999), we affirm the Order of the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas dated May 13, 1999. Furthermore, we remand the matter to the common pleas court for disposition of any remaining issues.

Jurisdiction is relinquished.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Douglas K. Hampton, Appellant.

The arresting officer testified that upon his arrival at the complainant’s house in response to a radio call, he observed the defendant lying on the floor with a stab wound in his back. After asking the complainant "what happened?” and *676receiving an explanation that the defendant had broken into his house, the officer turned to the defendant and asked the same question. In response, the defendant admitted that "he came in and he didn’t think anybody was home, and he was surprised and he got in a struggle and he got stabbed”. The statement was properly admitted, since the single question, asked of each individual, was not in the nature of interrogation but was rather a necessary preliminary inquiry "designed to clarify the nature of the situation” *(see, People v Huffman,*41 NY2d 29, 34). Until the officer got both individuals’ explanations, the appearance of the situation was sufficiently ambiguous to require clarification before taking any police action.

It is conceded by the People that the trial court erred in failing to notify the parties prior to summation that it would consider a lesser included offense *(see,*CPL 320.20 [5]). However, the defendant failed to preserve the issue for review by not applying for relief from the verdict, and exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction is not warranted. The defendant was in no way prejudiced by the error since the defense summation could not have been altered in any substantial way had he been properly informed of the offenses the court would consider *(see, People v Wachs,*93 AD2d 846, 847).

We have considered the defendant’s final contention and find it to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           6,050
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               2
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,359
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     20,043
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             601
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               592
<LOANS>                                         71,020
<ALLOWANCE>                                        864
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 102,496
<DEPOSITS>                                      90,818
<SHORT-TERM>                                     2,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,187
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           806
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,685
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 102,496
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  6,054
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  972
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   259
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 7,021
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,820
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,821
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,200
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       80
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  11
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,752
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    990
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         990
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       671
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .76
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.60
<LOANS-NON>                                        299
<LOANS-PAST>                                       140
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    292
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   826
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       75
<RECOVERIES>                                         8
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  864
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            864


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Oak Hill Financial, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, R. E.
Coffman, Jr., President, Chief Executive Officer & Chief Administrative Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
toss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


R. E. Coffman, Jr.
President & Chief Executive Officer

April 28, 2004


                                      -22-
# L_2011131EN.01002601.xml

| 18.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 131/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 131/26

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 of 18 December 2008 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and cooperation in matters relating to maintenance obligations

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 7 of 10 January 2009
  )

On page 20, Article 71, title:

for:

‘Information on contact details and languages (modelled on Article 25 of Regulation (EC) No 861/2007)’,

read:

‘Information on contact details and languages’;

on page 21, Article 75(1) and (2):

for:

‘1.   This Regulation shall apply only to proceedings instituted, to court settlements approved or concluded, and to authentic instruments established after its date of application, subject to paragraphs 2 and 3.

2.   Sections 2 and 3 of Chapter IV shall apply:

| (a) | to decisions given in the Member States before the date of application of this Regulation for which recognition and the declaration of enforceability are requested after that date; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

to decisions given in the Member States before the date of application of this Regulation for which recognition and the declaration of enforceability are requested after that date;

| (b) | to decisions given after the date of application of this Regulation following proceedings begun before that date, ...’, |
| --- | --- |

(b)

to decisions given after the date of application of this Regulation following proceedings begun before that date, ...’,

read:

‘1.   This Regulation shall apply only to proceedings instituted, to court settlements approved or concluded, and to authentic instruments established as from its date of application, subject to paragraphs 2 and 3.

2.   Sections 2 and 3 of Chapter IV shall apply:

| (a) | to decisions given in the Member States before the date of application of this Regulation for which recognition and the declaration of enforceability are requested as from that date; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

to decisions given in the Member States before the date of application of this Regulation for which recognition and the declaration of enforceability are requested as from that date;

| (b) | to decisions given as from the date of application of this Regulation following proceedings begun before that date, ...’. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

to decisions given as from the date of application of this Regulation following proceedings begun before that date, ...’.

---
1 –ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

ROBERT ALEXANDER,

Plaintiff, Case No. 2:15-cv-02179-CL

v. ORDER

COLLETTE PETERS, et al,.

Defendants.

_____________________________

MCSHANE, Judge:

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 217), 

and the matter is now before this Court on Plaintiff’s objections. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). I review de novo. United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th 

Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude the report is correct.

Magistrate Judge Clarke’s Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 217) is adopted in 

full. The case is dismissed and Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 135) is 

GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 19th day of June, 2019.

_ /s/ Michael J. McShane_______

 Michael McShane

United States District Judge
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

WILLIAM A. JENTSCH, JR.,

 Appellant,

v.

LAKE ROAD WELDING CO.,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-12-00287-CV

Appeal from the

97th District Court

of Archer County, Texas

(TC#2011-0090A-CV)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the 

judgment. We therefore reverse the judgment of the court below and remand the cause for 

further proceedings, in accordance with this Court’s opinion. We further order that Appellant 

recover from Appellee all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. This decision shall 

be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2014.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.

Rivera, J., not participating
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.


# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
SPORTSTAR ATHLETICS, INC., Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

WILSON SPORTING GOODS COMPA NY, Defendant

- Appellee

______________________

2018

- 1136

______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas in No. 4:15

- cv

- 01438, Judge Melinda Harmon.

______________________

JUDGMEN T

______________________

J OHN J. E DMONDS
, Collins Edmonds & Schlather, PLLC, Los Angeles, CA, argued for plaintiff

- appellant.

J EFFERY A. K EY
, Key & Associates, Chicago, IL, a rgued for defendant

- appellee.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :P ER C URIAM (N EWMAN
, W ALLACH
, and H UGHES
, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

September 17, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1696 

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to extend 

the tariff preference level on imports of certain cotton and man-made 

fiber, fabric, apparel, and made-up goods from Bahrain under the United 

States-Bahrain Free Trade Agreement. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 26, 2015 

Ms. GRAHAM (for herself and Mr. MILLER of Florida) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 

States to extend the tariff preference level on imports 

of certain cotton and man-made fiber, fabric, apparel, 

and made-up goods from Bahrain under the United 

States-Bahrain Free Trade Agreement. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1696 IH

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TARIFF PREFERENCE LEVEL 

2 ON IMPORTS OF CERTAIN COTTON AND MAN3 MADE FIBER, FABRIC, APPAREL, AND MADE4 UP GOODS FROM BAHRAIN UNDER THE 

5 UNITED STATES-BAHRAIN FREE TRADE 

6 AGREEMENT. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—U.S. Note 13 to subchapter XIV 

8 of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

9 United States is amended— 

10 (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (a)— 

11 (A) by striking ‘‘2015’’ and inserting 

12 ‘‘2025’’; and 

13 (B) by striking ‘‘January 1, 2016, through 

14 July 31, 2016’’ and inserting ‘‘January 1, 

15 2026, through July 31, 2026’’; and 

16 (2) in the matter following paragraph (d), by 

17 striking ‘‘July 31, 2016’’ and inserting ‘‘July 31, 

18 2026’’. 

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

20 this section shall apply with respect to articles entered, 

21 or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

22 January 1, 2016. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS