49304 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 168 / Thursday, September 2, 2021 / Notices 

16Commerce is exercising its discretion under 19 

CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii) to alter the time limit for the 

filing of case briefs. 

17See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1); see also Temporary 

Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due 

to COVID–19; Extension of Effective Period, 85 FR 

41363 (July 10, 2020) (Temporary Rule). 

18See Temporary Rule. 

19See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 

20 Id. 

21See 19 CFR 351.303. 

22Commerce is exercising its discretion under 19 

CFR 351.310(c) to alter the time limit for requesting 

a hearing. 

1See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 

63082 (October 6, 2020). 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review: Large Power Transformers 

from the Republic of Korea; 2019–2020,’’ dated 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 

notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 

3The full text of the scope of the order is 

contained in Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

4Commerce determined that LS Electric is the 

successor-in-interest to LSIS. See Large Power 

Transformers from the Republic of Korea: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, Final Determination of No Shipments, and 

Final Successor-in-Interest Determination; 2018– 

2019, 86 FR 30915 (June 10, 2021). 

5See LS Electric’s Letter, ‘‘Large Power 

Transformers from the Republic of Korea: LS 

date of publication of this notice.16

Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised 

in the case briefs, may be filed no later 

than seven days after the time limit for 

filing case briefs.17 Commerce modified 

certain of its requirements for serving 

documents containing business 

proprietary information until further 

notice.18 Parties who submit case briefs 

or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are 

requested to submit with each brief: (1) 

A statement of the issue; (2) a brief 

summary of the argument; and (3) a 

table of authorities.19 Executive 

summaries should be limited to five 

pages total, including footnotes.20 All 

submissions, with limited exceptions, 

must be filed electronically using 

ACCESS.21 Electronically filed 

comments must be received successfully 

in its entirety by Commerce’s electronic 

records system, ACCESS, by 5 p.m. 

Eastern Time on the due date. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing, must submit a written request 

to the Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance, filed 

electronically via ACCESS. Requests 

should contain: (1) The party’s name, 

address, and telephone number; (2) the 

number of participants; and (3) a list of 

issues to be discussed. Issues raised in 

the hearing will be limited to those 

raised in the respective case briefs. If a 

request for a hearing is made, Commerce 

intends to hold the hearing at a time and 

date to be determined. An electronically 

filed hearing request must be received 

successfully in its entirety by 

Commerce’s electronic records system, 

ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time 

within 14 days after the date of 

publication of this notice.22

Consistent with 19 CFR 351.216(e), 

Commerce intends to issue the final 

results of this CCR no later than 270 

days after the date on which this review 

was initiated, or within 45 days of 

publication of these preliminary results, 

if all parties agree to our preliminary 

finding. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is published in 

accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and 

777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.216(b) 

and 351.221(c)(3). 

Dated: August 30, 2021. 

James Maeder, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Good Cause 

V. Successor-In-Interest Determination 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–18992 Filed 9–1–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–580–867] 

Large Power Transformers From the 

Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and Preliminary Determination 

of No Shipments, 2019–2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily finds that 

large power transformers from the 

Republic of Korea were sold in the 

United States at less than normal value 

during the period of review (POR), 

August 1, 2019, through July 31, 2020. 

Interested parties are invited to 

comment on these preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable September 2, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

Drury, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0195. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Commerce initiated this review on 

October 6, 2020.1 We selected one 

mandatory respondent in this review, 

Hyosung Heavy Industries Corporation 

(Hyosung). For a more detailed 

description of the events that followed 

the initiation of this review, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum, 

dated concurrently with these results 

and hereby adopted by this notice.2

The Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

Access to ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/ 

index.html. A list of topics discussed in 

the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

is attached as an appendix to this 

notice. 

Scope of the Order 

The scope of this order covers large 

liquid dielectric power transformers 

having a top power handling capacity 

greater than or equal to 60,000 kilovolt 

amperes (60 megavolt amperes), 

whether assembled or unassembled, 

complete or incomplete. The 

merchandise subject to the order is 

currently classified in the Harmonized 

Tariff Schedule of the United States at 

subheadings 8504.23.0040, 

8504.23.0080 and 8504.90.9540. This 

tariff classification is provided for 

convenience and Customs purposes; 

however, the written description of the 

scope of the order is dispositive.3

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751(a)(2) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act). For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 

conclusions, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. 

Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments 

On October 27, 2020, LS Electric Co., 

Ltd. (LS Electric), formerly known as 

LSIS Co., Ltd. (LSIS) 4 timely notified 

Commerce that it had no exports, sales, 

or entries of subject merchandise during 

the POR.5 Commerce issued a no 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 168 / Thursday, September 2, 2021 / Notices 49305 

Electric Co., Ltd. (formerly known as LSIS Co., Ltd.) 

No Shipment Letter,’’ dated October 27, 2020. 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘shipment inquiry with 

respect to the company below during the period 08/ 

01/2019 through 07/31/2020,’’ dated November 20, 

2020. 

7See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp 

from Thailand; Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review, Partial Rescission of 

Review, Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments; 2012–2013, 79 FR 15951, 15952 (March 

24, 2014), unchanged in Certain Frozen Warmwater 

Shrimp from Thailand: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final 

Determination of No Shipments, and Partial 

Rescission of Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR 51306 

(August 28, 2014); and Magnesium Metal from the 

Russian Federation: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 

26922, 26923 (May 13, 2010), unchanged in 

Magnesium Metal from the Russian Federation: 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 75 FR 56989 (September 17, 2010). 

8See 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

9See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). 

10See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1); see also Temporary 

Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due 

to COVID–19; Extension of Effective Period, 85 FR 

41363 (July 10, 2020). 

11See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2). 

12See generally 19 CFR 351.303. 

13See 19 CFR 351.303(f). 

14See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act; see also 19 

CFR 351.213(h). 

15See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of 

the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 

Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103 

(February 14, 2012). 

16 Id. at 8102–03; see also 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). 

17See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 

18See Large Power Transformers from the 

Republic of Korea: Final Determination of Sales at 

Less Than Fair Value, 77 FR 40857 (July 11, 2012). 

19See section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act; see also 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum at Section VII, 

‘‘Rate for Non-Selected Companies. 

20See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. 

21See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue 

Liquidation Instructions After 15 Days in 

Applicable Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 3995 (January 

15, 2021). 

shipment inquiry to U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP), and CBP found 

no evidence of shipments from LSIS 

during the POR.6 Thus, based on record 

evidence, we preliminary determine 

that LSIS had no shipments during the 

POR. Consistent with Commerce’s 

practice, we find that it is not 

appropriate to rescind the review with 

respect to LSIS but, rather, to complete 

the review and issue appropriate 

instructions to CBP based on the final 

results of this review.7

Preliminary Results of Review 

We preliminarily determine that, for 

the period August 1, 2018, through July 

31, 2019, the following weightedaverage dumping margins exist: 

Producer/exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Hyosung Heavy Industries 

Corporation ....................... 8.85 

Hyundai Electric & Energy 

Systems Co., Ltd .............. 8.85 

Iljin Electric Co., Ltd ............. 8.85 

ILJIN ..................................... 8.85 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

Commerce will disclose to parties to 

the proceeding any calculations 

performed in connection with these 

preliminary results of review within five 

days after the date of publication of this 

notice.8 Interested parties are invited to 

comment on these preliminary results. 

Interested parties may submit case briefs 

no later than 30 days after the date of 

publication of this notice.9 Rebuttal 

briefs, the content of which is limited to 

the issues raised in the case briefs, must 

be filed within seven days from the 

deadline date for the submission of case 

briefs.10

Parties who submit case or rebuttal 

briefs in this proceeding are requested 

to submit with each argument: (1) A 

statement of the issue; (2) a brief 

summary of the argument; and (3) a 

table of authorities.11 Case and rebuttal 

briefs should be filed using ACCESS.12

Case and rebuttal briefs must be served 

on interested parties.13 Executive 

summaries should be limited to five 

pages total, including footnotes. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing must submit a request to the 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance within 30 days of the date 

of publication of this notice. Requests 

should contain: (1) The party’s name, 

address and telephone number; (2) the 

number of participants; (3) whether any 

participant is a foreign national; and (4) 

a list of issues parties intend to discuss. 

Issues raised in the hearing will be 

limited to those raised in the respective 

case and rebuttal briefs. If a request for 

a hearing is made, Commerce intends to 

hold the hearing at a time and date to 

be determined. Parties should confirm 

by telephone the date and time of the 

hearing two days before the scheduled 

date. 

Commerce intends to publish the final 

results of this administrative review, 

including the results of its analysis of 

issues raised in any case or rebuttal 

brief, no later than 120 days after 

publication of these preliminary results, 

unless extended.14

Assessment Rates 

Upon issuing the final results, 

Commerce shall determine, and CBP 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries. If the weightedaverage dumping margin for Hyosung is 

not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 

0.50 percent) in the final results of this 

review, we will calculate importerspecific assessment rates on the basis of 

the ratio of the total amount of dumping 

calculated for each importer’s examined 

sales and the total entered value of such 

sales in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(1).15 We will instruct CBP to 

assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review when the importer-specific 

assessment rate calculated in the final 

results of this review is above de 

minimis (i.e., 0.50 percent). If Hyosung’s 

weighted-average dumping margin is 

zero or de minimis in the final results 

of review, or if an importer-specific 

assessment rate is zero or de minimis, 

Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate 

appropriate entries without regard to 

antidumping duties.16

In accordance with Commerce’s 

‘‘automatic assessment’’ practice,17 for 

entries of subject merchandise during 

the review period produced by each 

respondent for which it did not know its 

merchandise was destined for the 

United States, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate of 22.00 percent established 

in the LTFV investigation.18

For the companies which were not 

selected for individual review (i.e., 

Hyundai Electric & Energy Systems Co., 

Ltd., Iljin Electric Co., Ltd., and ILJIN), 

we will assign an assessment rate based 

on the cash deposit rate calculated for 

the company selected for mandatory 

review (i.e., Hyosung).19 The final 

results of this review shall be the basis 

for the assessment of antidumping 

duties on entries of merchandise 

covered by the final results of this 

review and for future deposits of 

estimated duties, where applicable.20

Consistent with its recent notice,21

Commerce intends to issue assessment 

instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 

days after the date of publication of the 

final results of this review in the 

Federal Register. If a timely summons is 

filed at the U.S. Court of International 

Trade, the assessment instructions will 

direct CBP not to liquidate relevant 

entries until the time for parties to file 

a request for a statutory injunction has 

expired (i.e., within 90 days of 

publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
49306 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 168 / Thursday, September 2, 2021 / Notices 

22See Large Power Transformers from the 

Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 

53177 (August 31, 2012). 

1See Aluminum Wire and Cable from the 

People’s Republic of China: Antidumping Duty and 

Countervailing Duty Orders, 84 FR 70496 

(December 23, 2019) (Order). 

2See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 86 FR 

8166 (February 4, 2021) (Initiation Notice). 

3See Aluminum Wire and Cable from the 

People’s Republic of China: Initiation of Less-ThanFair-Value Investigation, 83 FR 52811 (October 18, 

2018). 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Release of U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection Data,’’ dated February 10, 

2021. 

5See Encore’s Letter, ‘‘Aluminum Wire and Cable 

from the People’s Republic of China: Comments on 

Customs Data and Respondent Selection,’’ dated 

February 17, 2021. 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Administrative Review of 

the Antidumping Duty Order of Aluminum Wire 

and Cable from the People’s Republic of China; 

2019–2020—Rescission of Questionnaire Issued to 

Jin Tiong Electrical Materials Manufacturer PTE, 

Limited,’’ dated July 28, 2020. 

7See Memorandum, ‘‘Administrative Review of 

the Antidumping Duty Order of Aluminum Wire 

and Cable from the People’s Republic of China; 

Removal of Questionnaire Issued to Jin Tiong 

Electrical Materials Manufacturer PTE, Limited,’’ 

dated July 29, 2021. 

8See Jin Tiong’s letter, ‘‘Aluminum Wire and 

Cable from the People’s Republic of China, A–570– 

095; Objection to Withdrawal of Questionnaire,’’ 

dated July 30, 2021. 

9See Southwire’s Letter, ‘‘Aluminum Wire and 

Cable from the People’s Republic of China: 

Response to Jin Tiong’s Objection to Withdrawal of 

Questionnaire; Request that the Department Reject 

Jin Tiong’s Section A Questionnaire Response,’’ 

dated August 9, 2021. 

10See Memorandum, ‘‘Administrative Review of 

the Antidumping Duty Order of Aluminum Wire 

and Cable from the People’s Republic of China; 

Rejection and Removal of Jin Tiong Electrical 

Materials Manufacturer PTE, Limited’s Unsolicited 

Section A Questionnaire Response,’’ dated August 

16, 2021. 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review for all shipments 

of the subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date of the final results of this 

administrative review, as provided by 

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The 

cash deposit rate for Hyosung and other 

companies listed above will be equal to 

the weighted-average dumping margin 

established in the final results of this 

administrative review; (2) for previously 

reviewed or investigated companies not 

listed above, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company-specific rate 

published for the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding in 

which they were reviewed; (3) if the 

exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review, a prior review, or in the 

investigation but the producer is, the 

cash deposit rate will be the rate 

established for the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding 

for the producer of the merchandise; 

and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other 

producers or exporters will continue to 

be the all-others rate of 22.00 percent, 

the rate established in the investigation 

of this proceeding.22 These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: August 27, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Deadline for Submission of Updated Sales 

and Cost Information 

IV. Scope of the Order 

V. Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments 

VI. Discussion of the Methodology 

VII. Rate for Non-Selected Companies 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–19000 Filed 9–1–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–095] 

Aluminum Wire and Cable From the 

People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2019– 

2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) is conducting an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty (AD) order on 

aluminum wire and cable from the 

People’s Republic of China (China) 

covering the period June 5, 2019, 

through November 30, 2020. We 

preliminarily determine that ICF Cable 

and Jin Tiong Electrical Materials 

Manufacturer PTE, Limited (Jin Tiong) 

are not eligible for a separate rate, and, 

therefore, are part of the China-wide 

entity. Interested parties are invited to 

comment on these preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable September 2, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sean Carey, AD/CVD Operations, Office 

VII, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3964. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 23, 2019, Commerce 

published the AD order on aluminum 

wire and cable from China.1 On 

February 4, 2021, Commerce initiated 

the administrative review of the AD 

order on aluminum wire and cable from 

China covering the period June 5, 2019, 

through November 30, 2020.2 The 

petitioners in this proceeding are Encore 

Wire Corporation (Encore) and 

Southwire Company, LLC (Southwire).3

This review covers two producers or 

exporters of subject merchandise: ICF 

Cable and Jin Tiong. 

On February 10, 2021, Commerce 

released U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) entry data for U.S. 

imports of aluminum wire and cable 

from China during the POR that were 

subject to the Order during the POR.4

Encore, one of the petitioners, submitted 

comments on the CBP entry data and 

respondent selection on February 17, 

2021.5

On July 28, 2021, Commerce 

determined that it had erroneously 

issued its questionnaire to Jin Tiong 6

(see ‘‘Preliminary Results of 

Administrative Review’’ section, below), 

and, accordingly, withdrew the 

questionnaire and removed it from the 

record.7 Jin Tiong objected to 

Commerce’s decision to withdraw the 

questionnaire on July 30, 2021.8 On 

August 5, 2021, Jin Tiong submitted a 

section A questionnaire response. 

Southwire, one of the petitioners, 

submitted comments on August 9, 2021, 

requesting Commerce to remove Jin 

Tiong’s section A questionnaire 

response from the record.9 On August 

16, 2021, Commerce rejected Jin Tiong’s 

Section A questionnaire and removed it 

from the record.10

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by this Order 

are aluminum wire and cable from 

China. For a full description of the 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1