alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center

Update on Strategy for Developing 

Information Needs Derived from 

AMP Goals and Management 

Objectives for the Colorado River 

Ecosystem

GCMRC Program Staff

Flagstaff, AZ
Presentation Outline

• The GCMRC’sIN Development Strategy

• Timeline and Schedule for 2001 - 2002

• Recent Activities for Biology and Physical MO’s

• Recent Activities for Socio-Cultural MO’s

• First Workshop Outcome – Terrestrial/Aquatic

• Call for Comments from TWG and SAB

• Schedule for Future IN Development Activities
MO’s – IN’s and GCMRC

• Follow Integrated Structure of GCMRC 

• Group MO’s into Ecosystem Organization

• Detail How IN’s Relate to MO’s - within the 

GCMRC Strategic/Annual Science Plans

• Initial “Sequencing” Determined - on basis of 

Science Rationale and Fiscal Program Limitations

• Limit Initial Development of IN’s - to those 

Pursued in GCMRC’s 2002-2006 Strategic Plan 
Information Need Development

2001 – 2002 Timeline

• Participation by GCMRC in Development of MO’s

Draft IN’s Follow PEP and NRC Guidance (Hierarchical)

• IN’s Follow GCMRC Science Program (Ecosystem)

Workshop I - Scientists and Stakeholders (April)

• Presentation of Draft IN’s to TWG (May 30th)

TWG Comment Period and Revision (June 2001)

• SAB Comment Period and Revision (July - August 2001)

Workshop II - TWG and Scientists in Flagstaff (August)

• Incorporation of Revised IN’s into GCMRC Strategic Plan

Seek Approval of IN’s from Strategery in January 2002
Recent IN Activities

Biology/Physical and Socio-Cultural

• Biology/Physical IN’s Workshop in April 2001

Workgroup Participants Organized into Aquatic 

and Terrestrial Ecosystem Sessions

• Socio-Cultural/Recreation Workshop in May 2001

Ongoing Process for Seeking Comments, with 

Intent for Joint-Participation in Workshop II
First Workshop Outcome

(Biology/Physical)

• Aquatic Ecosystem Group Focus

Fish “Population Estimates and Dynamics”, 

followed by “Limiting Factors”

• Terrestrial Ecosystem Group Focus

Mapping Riparian Vegetation Distributions 

Throughout the Ecosystem

• Written Comments Solicited

Received 5 Spreadsheet Replies from Scientists, 

Including Information on “Sequencing”
Seeking TWG Comment

• Electronic Spreadsheet Format Distributed on (June 1st)

Comments Back to Serena Mankiller by e-mail (June 21st)

• Comment on Existing Draft IN Language

Evaluate Relative Need for “Sequencing” (low, med, high)

• Commit to Full TWG Participation in Workshop II

Provide Additional Draft IN’s that May not be Listed

(Need to Establish Date)
Future IN Development

Summer 2001

• Next Draft will Identify Research vs. Monitoring IN’s

• GCMRC’s‘03 Annual Plan will Describe IN’s in Projects

• Some Target Levels are Known, Others Need Research

• Workshop II – Will Focus on Strategic Science Planning

• Integration of Physical, Biological and Socio-Cultural
THANK YOU FOR YOUR 

ATTENTION

Grand Canyon Monitoring and 

Research Center

U.S. Geological Survey
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Small Grains and Potato Germplasm Research: Aberdeen, ID
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Aberdeen, Idaho Small Grains and Potato Germplasm Research People & Locations







John  Mortenson
                        Small Grains and Potato Germplasm Research

                        




                        
                        Biological Science Technician
                        Phone: (208) 510-6687
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

SUZANNE E. SUTHERLAND, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY 

ADMINISTRATION, 

Defendant. 

MARSH, Judge 

Case No. 3:16-cv-00321-MA 

ORDER FOR EAJA FEES 

On May 19, 2017, Plaintiff filed an Unopposed Application for Fees Pursuant to the Equal 

Access to Justice Act ("EAJ A"), 28 U .S.C. § 2412( d), in which the parties agree that Plaintiff should 

be awarded fees in the amount of $6,471.25. ECF No. 23. 

Accordingly, based on the agreement of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that attorney fees 

in the amount of $6,471.25 shall be awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to EAJA. There are no costs or 

expenses. The parties agree that attorney fees will be paid to Plaintiffs attorney subject to 

verification that Plaintiff does not have a debt which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, 

pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as discussed inAstrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010). 

1 - ORDER FOR EAJA FEES 
If Plaintiff has no such debt, then the check shall be made out to Plaintiffs attorney, Karen 

Stolzberg, and mailed to her address: 11830 SW Ken- Parkway, #315, Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035. 

If Plaintiff has a debt, then the check for any remaining funds after offset of the debt shall be made 

out to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiffs attorney's office at the address stated above. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATEDthis .Pl i"dayofMAY,2017. 

Malcolm F. Marsh 

United States District Judge 

2 - ORDER FOR EAJA FEES
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                                MAR VENTURES INC.


     Pursuant to Section 242 of the General  Corporation  Law of  Delaware,  the
undersigned corporation certifies to the Secretary of State of Delaware that:

     FIRST: The name of the corporation is Mar Ventures Inc.

     SECOND:  The following  amendment to the Certificate Of  Incorporation  was
adopted by the Board Of Directors of the corporation at a meeting held on August
13, 1997 and by a majority of the  stockholders  of the  corporation  by written
consent effective as of October 7, 1997, in the manner prescribed by the General
Corporation Law of Delaware.

     Article FIRST of the Certificate Of Incorporation is amended to read in its
entirety as follows:

          "FIRST. The name of the corporation is PYR Energy Corporation."

     THIRD:  This Certificate Of Amendment is to become effective as of November
12, 1997.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Certificate Of Amendment has been signed this 30th
day of October, 1997.

                                    MAR VENTURES INC.



                                     By:  /s/ D. Scott Singdahlsen
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          D. Scott Singdahlsen, President and
                                          Chief Executive Officer

ATTESTED BY:



/s/  Andrew P. Calerich
-------------------------------------------
Andrew P. Calerich, Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 170 (Tuesday, September 7, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50147-50148]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19212]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2021-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-2134]


Proposed Flood Hazard Determinations for Daviess County, Kentucky 
and Incorporated Areas

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is withdrawing 
its proposed notice concerning proposed flood hazard determinations, 
which may include the addition or modification of any Base Flood 
Elevation, base flood depth, Special Flood Hazard Area boundary or zone 
designation, or regulatory floodway (herein after referred to as 
proposed flood hazard determinations) on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps 
and, where applicable, in the supporting Flood Insurance Study reports 
for Daviess County, Kentucky and Incorporated Areas.

DATES: This withdrawal is effective September 7, 2021.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA-B-
2134, to Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering Services Branch, Federal 
Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA, 400 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-7659, or (email) 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1b6b7a6f6972787035687a78797279726f5b7d7e767a357f7368357c746d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1d6d7c696f747e76336e7c7e7f747f74695d7b78707c3379756e337a726b">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering 
Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA, 
400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-7659, or (email) 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#35455441475c565e1b465456575c575c4175535058541b515d461b525a43"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3a4a5b4e4853595114495b59585358534e7a5c5f575b145e5249145d554c">[email protected]</span></a>;

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 24, 2021, FEMA published a proposed 
notice at 86 FR 27871, proposing flood hazard determinations for 
Daviess County, Kentucky and Incorporated Areas. FEMA is withdrawing 
the proposed notice.

[[Page 50148]]

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4104; 44 CFR 67.4.

Michael M. Grimm,
Assistant Administrator for Risk Management, Department of Homeland 
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2021-19212 Filed 9-3-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Order entered July 30, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01549-CR

LADALE CUBIT, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F11-34970-K

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES this appeal.

On April 24, 2013, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the 

reporter’s record has not been filed in this appeal. Although court reporter Janice Garrett filed, 

on May 22, 2013, a request for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record, she did not 

tender the reporter’s record with the extension request. On July 22, 2013, we received the 

reporter’s record. Accordingly, in the interest of expediting the appeal, we VACATE the April 

24, 2013 order requiring findings.

Because Ms. Garrett did not tender the reporter’s record by the July 1, 2013 date 

specified in her extension request, we DENY that request as moot.
On the Court’s own motion, we consider the reporter’s record received on July 22, 2013 

properly filed.

Appellant’s brief is due within thirty days of the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1844 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1844

 To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 
to designate high priority corridors on the National Highway System in 
          the State of North Carolina, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 16, 2015

Mr. Butterfield (for himself, Mr. Jones, Mr. Meadows, Mr. Holding, Mr. 
  Rouzer, Ms. Adams, and Mr. Price of North Carolina) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
                           and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 
to designate high priority corridors on the National Highway System in 
          the State of North Carolina, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Military Corridor Transportation 
Improvement Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. HIGH PRIORITY CORRIDORS ON NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM.

    (a) In General.--Section 1105(c) of the Intermodal Surface 
Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (105 Stat. 2032) is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
            ``(81) United States Route 117/Interstate Route 795 from 
        United States Route 70 in Goldsboro, Wayne County, North 
        Carolina, to Interstate Route 40 west of Faison, Sampson 
        County, North Carolina.
            ``(82) United States Route 70 from its intersection with 
        Interstate Route 40 in Garner, Wake County, North Carolina, to 
        the Port at Morehead City, Carteret County, North Carolina.''.
    (b) Inclusion of Certain Route Segments on Interstate System.--
Section 1105(e)(5)(A) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation 
Efficiency Act of 1991 (105 Stat. 2031; 109 Stat. 597; 115 Stat. 872; 
118 Stat. 293; 126 Stat. 426) is amended in the first sentence by 
striking ``and subsection (c)(57)'' and inserting ``subsection (c)(57), 
subsection (c)(81), and subsection (c)(82)''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements of Industri-Matematik International Corp. on Form S-8 (SEC file
no. 333-19737), Form S-8 (SEC file no. 333-25407), Form S-8 (SEC file no.
333-81905), Form S-8 (SEC file no. 333-92953), and Form S-8 (SEC file no.
333-60876) of our report dated July 5, 2002, relating to the Consolidated
Financial Statements of Industri-Matematik International Corp. as of April
30, 2002 and 2001, and for the years ended April 30, 2002, 2001 and 2000,
which is incorporated in this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers AB

By: /s/ ROBERT BARNDEN
    Robert Barnden

Stockholm, Sweden
July 30, 2002
#### Ramos J. Barbee *v.*Jose Santos, Warden, Community Correctional Center, Bridgeport

House, C. J., Loiselle, MacDonald, Bogdanski and Longo, Js.

Argued March 4

decision released April 1, 1975

*Charles Townsend, Jr.,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

*Walter D. Flanagan,*assistant state’s attorney, with whom, on the brief, was *Donald A. Browne,*state’s attorney, for the appellee (defendant).

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff applied for a writ of habeas corpus to test the legality of his arrest under a warrant issued by the governor of Connecticut pursuant to the authority of § 54-163 of the General Statutes and upon a demand for extradition made by the governor of California, all in accordance with *275the provisions of the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act. General Statutes, c. 964. The court denied the writ and the plaintiff brought the present appeal from that judgment.

We find no merit whatsoever in the plaintiff’s appeal. The finding of the court, which is not subject to any material correction, discloses a proper extradition request from California to extradite the plaintiff for the crime of forgery committed by the plaintiff in that state and that the plaintiff was in California at the time of the offense alleged. The plaintiff admitted depositing $40,000 worth of stolen checks and money orders in his personal savings account in California, leaving that state and driving to Connecticut where he was arrested for larceny when he attempted to transfer funds from the California savings account to a Connecticut bank.

The court concluded that the plaintiff was present in California at the time of the commission of the alleged crime, that he fled from there and is a fugitive from that state, that California has made the appropriate written demand specified by the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act, that the plaintiff would not be deprived of his constitutional rights by being returned to California, and that returning him to that state would not be injurious to his health and would not endanger his life. The latter two findings, while of doubtful relevance to the extradition proceedings, were included because of the plaintiff’s claim that he acted under duress in California and that returning him to that state would seriously endanger his health. In any event, whether the plaintiff’s assertions were true presented questions of fact for the determination of the trial court. His lengthy criminal record was *276obviously a material circumstance in determining what credibility, if any, should be given to his testimony.

We have recently reviewed the law applicable to extradition cases. See *Glavin*v. *Warden,*163 Conn. 394, 311 A.2d 86; *Reynolds*v. *Conway,*161 Conn. 329, 288 A.2d 77; *Mandarano*v. *Tierney,*151 Conn. 155, 195 A.2d 48; *McPheters*v. *Pollard,*146 Conn. 509, 152 A.2d 632. It would serve no useful purpose to repeat what we have so recently restated.

We find no error in the judgment of the trial court which denied the plaintiff’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

There is no error.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-51064

TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY; BOYD L RICHIE, in his capacity as

Chairman of the Texas Democratic Party

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

ROGER WILLIAMS, in his capacity as Secretary of State for the State of

Texas

Defendant-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas 

USDC No. 1:07-CV-115

Before JOLLY, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

We have reviewed the briefs, pertinent portions of the record, and the

applicable law and have heard the arguments of counsel. We find no reversible

error in the district court’s grant of summary judgment, especially in the light

of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Crawford v. Marion County Election

Board, 128 S. Ct. 1610 (2008), which confirms that the district court

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

July 30, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-51064

2

appropriately applied the balancing test of Anderson v. Celebrezze, 460 U.S. 780

(1983), and Burdick v. Takushi, 504 U.S. 428 (1992),to the constitutional claims

raised. The summary judgment is AFFIRMED, essentially for the reasons given

by the district court in its well-considered opinion.
Exhibit (10)(a)

    

    

    

    

    

    

    Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    

    

    

    

    We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in
      Post-Effective Amendment No. 63 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-35784) and Amendment No. 554 to the 1940 Act Registration
      Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-05721), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 13, 2020, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 15, 2020, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln National Variable Annuity
      Account H for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    May 15, 2020
Technical Work Group Meeting 

FINAL  AGENDA

Glen Canyon Dam 

Adaptive Management Program 

Technical Work Group Meeting

Bureau of Indian Affairs

2 Arizona Center, 400 N. 5

th St., Phoenix AZ

12

th Floor, Conference Rooms A&B

November 12, 2003

START

TIME  TOPIC PERSON PURPOSE  MATERIALS

9:35 a.m. Welcome and

Administrative

Norm Henderson

1. Introductions and

Determination of Quorum 

2. Review Action Items from 

October 1­2, 2003 Meeting

3. Approval of October 1­2, 2003

Meeting Minutes

Agenda

Action Items/

Draft Minutes

9:55 a.m. Cultural Program and

PA Update

Helen Fairley  Information and Discussion

10:30 a.m. Experimental Flow

Proposal

Clayton Palmer  Information and Discussion

Experimental

Flow Proposal

11:10 a.m. FY 2004 Project

Planning and

Implementation

GCMRC Information and Discussion

12:15 p.m. L U N C H

1:10 p.m. Update on GCMRC

Reorganization

Jeff Lovich Information

1:30 p.m.

FY 2005 Budget and

Work Plans  GCMRC and

USBR Information and Discussion

USBR

Administration

GCMRC Draft 

Annual Work

Plan

3:05 p.m. B R E A K

3:15 p.m. FY 2005 Budget andWork Plans (cont) 

GCMRC and

USBR Information and Discussion

List of 

Projects/

Spreadsheet

5 p.m. Wrap­up and Adjourn Norm Henderson
Technical Work Group Meeting 

FINAL  AGENDA

Glen Canyon Dam 

Adaptive Management Program 

Technical Work Group Meeting

Bureau of Indian Affairs

2 Arizona Center, 400 N. 5

th St., Phoenix AZ

12

th Floor, Conference Rooms A&B

November 13, 2003

START

TIME  TOPIC PERSON PURPOSE  MATERIALS

8:10 a.m. Welcome and

Administrative

Norm Henderson

8:15 a.m. FY 2005 Budget and

Work Plans 

GCMRC and

USBR Information and Discussion

USBR

Administration

GCMRC Draft 

Annual Work

Plan

List of 

Projects/

Spreadsheet

10 a.m. B R E A K

10:15 a.m. FY 2005 Budget andWork Plans (cont.) 

GCMRC and

USBR Recommendation to AMWG

11:45 a.m. Wrap­up and Adjourn Norm Henderson
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 19

- 00363

- CV

Joseph Andrew BURT , II,

Appellant

v.

DENNY'S, INC.

, Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CV02727

- A

Honorable Karen Crouch, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE RIOS , AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that appellee, Denny’s, Inc., recover its costs of this appeal from

appellant, Joseph Andrew Burt, II.

SIGNED March 25, 2020.

_____________________________ Irene Rios, Justice