alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                         JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                           SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                      238390
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               160923
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                                  47937
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            492463
<PP&E>                                                    18030813
<DEPRECIATION>                                           (1634572)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            17368570
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      3148097
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                      5975
<OTHER-SE>                                                 2770969
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              17368570
<SALES>                                                    5844078
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           6153486
<CGS>                                                      2203192
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           4130835
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          609168
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           (789709)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                227000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       (562709)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                              (562709)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                      0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         938,147               1,905,478
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  153,711                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,091,858               1,905,478
<PP&E>                                         305,862                 195,735
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,436,470               2,151,285
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          105,049                  20,726
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           492                     492
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,436,470               2,151,285
<SALES>                                        153,711                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               153,711                       0
<CGS>                                           44,268                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   44,268                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               967,594                 663,820
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             (858,151)               (663,820)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              86,604                  38,331
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (771,547)               (625,489)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0



</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2

I, Kenneth T. Myers, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the registrant, Digital Lightwave, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants
other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: April 30, 2009



By:

/s/ KENNETH T. MYERSKenneth T. MyersChief Accounting Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
#### In the Matter of Injah E. Tafari, Appellant, v Anthony F. Zon, as Superintendent of Wende Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

Submitted April 23, 2007;

decided June 12, 2007

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought t'o be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.

Judge Pigott taking no part.
#### Candace J. SULLIVAN, Appellee, v. The UNITED STATES, Appellant.

No. 84-806.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Sept. 6, 1984.

Robert A. Reutershan, Washington, D.C., argued for appellant. With him on the brief were Richard K. Willard, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., and David M. Cohen, Washington, D.C., Director.

Roxanne Ando, Washington, D.C., of Office of the Gen. Counsel Dept, of Educ., of counsel.

John Salter, Washington, D.C., of Office of the Gen. Counsel Office of Personnel Management.

Steven M. Schneebaum, Washington, D.C., argued for appellee. With him on the brief was Lisa A. Shapiro, Washington, D.C.

Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the United States Claims Court which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and denied defendant’s motion to dismiss this claim for severance pay. We *affirm.*

OPINION

The judgment appealed from is affirmed on the basis of the opinion filed by the Claims Court. *Sullivan v. United States,*4 Cl.Ct. 70 (1983).

AFFIRMED.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ruth Rodriguez, Appellant.

— Ordered that the judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Demakos, J.), rendered June 13, 1985, is affirmed *(see, People v Pellegrino,*60 NY2d 636; *People v Kazepis,*101 AD2d 816). Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Lawrence and Hooper, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 10.33

                                    AMENDMENT

This document, dated January 16, 1998, amends the Employment Agreement, dated
October 5, 1995 between Xenometrix, Inc. and Pauline Gee. Section 6(d) of the
Employment Agreement is hereby cancelled and replaced with the following Section
6(d):

      (d) If the Employee's employment shall be terminated by the Corporation
          pursuant to Section 5(d) or (f) hereof, then the corporation shall
          continue to pay the Employee his regular salary through the date which
          is six months after the Date of Termination; if the Employee's
          employment shall be terminated by the Corporation pursuant to Section
          5(e) hereof or as a result of a change of control of the corporation
          or of its Board of Directors, then the corporation shall continue to
          pay the Employee his regular salary through the date which is twelve
          months after the Date of Termination; provided, however, that in any
          case, the Corporation's obligation to pay such salary shall terminate
          at such time as the Employee commences any alternative full-time
          employment. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Corporation will be
          obligated to reimburse the Employee for reimbursable expenses (to the
          extent provided in Section 3(c) hereof) accrued through the Date of
          Termination. The Employee shall also be entitled to receive a payment
          for (i) any accrued but unused vacation days and (ii) a pro rata
          portion of any cash bonus due pursuant to Section 3(b) hereof. If the
          Employee's employment shall be terminated by the Corporation pursuant
          to Section 5(d), (e) or (f) hereof, and if the Employee shall be
          ineligible to participate in any of the Corporation's fringe benefit
          plans or arrangements as a result of his ceasing to be an employee of
          the Corporation, then the Corporation shall arrange to provide the
          Employee with substantially equivalent benefits as if he remained
          employed by the Corporation until the earlier of (i) six months, if
          terminated under Section 5(d) or (f), or twelve months, if terminated
          under Section 5(e) at no additional expense to the Employee.

XENOMETRIX, INC.                        PAULINE GEE


By:
     ------------------------------     --------------------------
Its:
     ------------------------------
Exhibit 10.5


 


POWER
OF ATTORNEY


 


Trustor: Xinyang Wang, citizen of People’s Republic
of China, ID NO. [XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX], residence of Zhejiang Lishui Liandu District, is a shareholder of Hangzhou Nongyuan Network
Technology Co., Ltd.(“Hangzhou Company”).


 


Trustee: Zhengyu Wang, citizen of People’s Republic
of China, ID NO. [XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX], residence: Building 14, Room 503, Jincheng Garden, West Lake District, Hangzhou, is designee
of Hangzhou Suyuan Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd. (“Shanghai Company”).


 


Whereas, 


 


1) Trustor, Zhengyu Wang, Shanghai Company and Hangzhou Company
entered into a Proxy Agreement dated as of December 10, 2019.


 


2) Trustee was designated by Shanghai Company to exercise rights
under Proxy Agreement on behalf of Shanghai Company.


 


Thereof, Trustor issues Trustee with this Power of Attorney:


 


Matter and limits of authority: Trustor hereby irrevocably
authorizes Trustee to solely exercise shareholder voting right of Hangzhou Company under the law and Memorandum and Articles of
Association of Hangzhou Company as representative, including, without limitation:


 


	a.	Convene, convoke and attend shareholders’ meeting of Hangzhou Company as representative of Trustor;
	 	 
	b.	Submit proposal to Hangzhou Company Board of shareholders as representative of Trustor;
	 	 
	c.	Vote on matters to be deliberated at the shareholders’ meeting of Hangzhou Company  (including, without limitation, elect or remove directors, supervisors, etc.);
	 	 
	d.	Sign on minutes of Hangzhou Company shareholders’ meeting;
	 	 
	e.	Exercise other voting rights of shareholders under Memorandum and Articles of Association of Hangzhou Company ;
	 	 
	f.	Submit relevant documents to industrial and commercial registration offices and other government authorities concerned in order to performance or guarantee this contract as representative of Trustor (shareholder);
	 	 
	g.	Sign Share Transfer Agreement or other relevant documents, deal with official documents, registration, records or other procedures in order to enable share transfer under Exclusive Purchase Agreement take effect.


 


Term of entrustment : This Power of Attorney is always effect
unless the effectiveness of Proxy Agreement terminates, Shanghai Company designates other person as Trustee under Proxy Agreement,
the Trustee dies or loses capacity for civil conduct.


 


Re-entrustment: Trustor agrees that Trustee has the right to
re-entrust other persons to exercise rights on behalf of Trustee.


 


	Trustor:	/s/ Xinyang Wang	 
	 	 	 
	December 10, 2019
Merrill Schneider, OSB #77336 

merrillschneider@schneiderlaw.com 

Schneider Kerr & Robichaux 

PO Box 14490 

Portland, Oregon 97293 

Phone: 503-255-9092 

Fax: 503-255-9145 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

DOUGLAS SANDS, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 

 Defendant. 

3:16-CV-00793-SB 

ORDER FOR ATTORNEY 

FEES UNDER 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) 

The court finds and orders an attorney fee of $18,180 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). The 

attorney fee of $1,960.46 allowed pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act was seized by the 

Treasury and thus will not be paid to Plaintiff. 

Dated this _______ day of ____________________, 2018. 

________________________________ 

Stacie F. Beckerman 

United States Magistrate Judge 

15th November
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

MARGATE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, a dependent district of the City of Margate, Florida, and THE CITY OF MARGATE, FLORIDA
, Appellant s ,

v.

NEW URBAN COMMUNITIES, LLC, a Florida limited liability company

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 1763

[ April 28, 2021 ]

Appeal of a nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Michael A. Robinson , Judge; L.T. Case

No. C ACE 18

- 004869(13)

.

Lyman H. Reynolds, Jr., of Roberts Reynolds Bedard & Tuzzio, PLLC, West Palm Beach, for appellant City of Margate.

Michael T. Burke and Selena A. Gibson of Johnson, Anselmo, Murdoch, Burke, Piper & Hochman, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant Margate Community Redevelopment Agency.

Michael W. Moskowitz and Ari J. Glazer of Moskowitz, Mandell, Salim & Simowitz, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

We reverse the trial court’s non

- final order denying the Appellants’

motion s to dismiss. We agree with the Appellants that the two tort claims at issue are barred by sovereign immunity because they are premised on the denial of a land use plan amendment, which is a discretionary governmental function. See Com

. Carrier Corp. v. Indian River Cty ., 371 So. 2d 1010, 102 0 (Fla. 1979) (recognizing that the waiver of sovereign immunity in section 768.28, Florida Statutes, does not extend to “discretionary governmental functions”); Trianon Park Condo

. Ass ' n, Inc. v.

Ci ty of Hialeah , 468 So. 2d 912, 919 (Fla. 1985) (“ Clearly, the legislature, commissions, boards, city councils

, and executive officers, by their enactment of, or failure to enact, laws or regulations, or by their issuance2 of, or refusal to issue, licenses, permits, variances or directives, are acting pursuant to basic government al functions performed by the legislative or executive branches of government. ”); City of Pembroke Pines v. Corr. Corp. of Am., Inc. , 274 So. 3d 1105, 111 3 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019) (recognizing case

law “ applying sovereign immunity to bar recovery of economic damages against a municipality for the denial of a development application ” ).

We remand for the trial court to grant the motion s to dismiss and

dismiss the two tort counts at issue.

Reversed and r emand ed with directions

.

G ROSS

, G ERBER and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 12.2

CERTIFICATION



I, Michael L. Carroll, certify that:



1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Cumberland Resources Ltd.;



2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.  The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and



5.  The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  June 28, 2005

/s/  Michael L. Carroll



Michael L. Carroll, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary
Glen Canyon Dam Technical Work Group Meeting 

July 16 -17, 2008 

No. List of Attachments Presenter/Author 

1 Action Item Tracking Report 

2 Cultural Resources Ad Hoc Group (CRAHG) Update on 

Cultural Research and Development Project (handout only) 

Helen Fairley 

3a A Vegetation Database for the Colorado River Ecosystem from 

Glen Canyon Dam to the Western Boundary of Grand Canyon 

National Park, Arizona, (Open File Report 2008-1216) prepared 

by Barbara Ralston 

Matthew Andesen 

3b Terrestrial Biotic Monitoring status and Long-term Approach 

Part 1: Background; A Vegetation Database for the Colorado 

River Ecosystem; Terrestrial Bioto Status and Long-term 

Approach, Part 1: 2008 MRP .... 

Matthew Andersen 

4 Foraging Ecology of Nonnative Trout in the Colorado River, 

Grand Canyon Predation on Native Fishes and the Effects of 

Turbidity PPT

Mike Yard 

5 National Park Service Management at Grand Canyon National 

Park PPT and litigation update 

Jan Balsom 

6a GCDAMP Budget and Work Plan – FY09 USBR & GCMRC 

6b USBR & GCMRC Budget presentation PPT Dennis Kubly 

6c GCMRC Budget Presentation PPT

6d Memo from GCMRC to AMWG dated April 17, 2008, Subject: 

Preliminary Fiscal Year 2009 GCDAMP Budget 

6e FY2009 GCDAMP Work Plan and Budget Comment/Response 

Table 

John Hamill 

7 Minority Report to Ms. Brenda Burman, Subj: Technical Work 

Group Minority Report regarding FY09 Budget line item, BIO 

2.R16.09 “Mainstem Coldwater Fish Control – New Initiative 

Mark Steffen 

8 General Core Monitoring Plan for the GCD-AMP PPT William L. Halvorson
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DAVID ZAVALA,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-17-00136-CR

Appeal from the

120th District Court 

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20140D05270) 

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 24TH DAY OF MAY, 2019.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0471

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

CARESSA JILL HARDY, aka

GLENN LEE DIBLEY,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 2, 2021, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 25 2021

06/25/2021

Case Number: DA 19-0471