alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 40869 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

KEITH LEMORRIS JONES

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 5:13

- CR

- 24

- 1

Before REAVLEY, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Keith Lemorris Jones has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California

, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Jones h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 7, 2015
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-40869 Document: 00513106840 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/07/2015No. 14

- 40869

2 Accordingly, counsel’s motion to seal the record excerpts is GRANTED;

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED ; counsel is excused from

further responsibilities herei n ; and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 14-40869 Document: 00513106840 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/07/2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      22,320,814
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,063,574
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            27,373,697
<PP&E>                                       2,291,772
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,758,210
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             222,780,950
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,202,621
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        49,634
<OTHER-SE>                                 206,578,329
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               222,780,950
<SALES>                                      6,362,226
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,362,226
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               34,188,317
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (27,229,411)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (27,229,411)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (27,229,411)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.02)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1740 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1740

 To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit former Members of 
  Congress from lobbying Members, officers, or employees of Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 13, 2015

   Mr. Blum introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit former Members of 
  Congress from lobbying Members, officers, or employees of Congress.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Golden Parachutes for Public 
Service Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST LOBBYING OF CONGRESS BY FORMER MEMBERS.

    (a) Senators.--Section 207(e)(1)(A) of title 18, United States 
Code, is amended by striking ``within 2 years''.
    (b) Members and Officers of the House of Representatives.--Section 
207(e)(1)(B)(i) of such title is amended by striking ``within 1 year''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by this Act shall apply with respect to 
individuals who leave office on or after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
NUMBER 13-09-00349-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

JOHNNY POLENDO MARTINEZ, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 117th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Johnny Polendo Martinez, by and through his attorney, has filed a 

motion to dismiss his appeal because he no longer desires to prosecute it. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to 

dismiss pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal. 

Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be 
2

entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 

Delivered and filed

the 13th day of May, 2010.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 21.1 - SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                               State or Jurisdiction
                                                 % of Voting Securities          Under the Law of
Name                                                     Owned                     Which Organized
Subsidiaries of National Processing, Inc.
<S>                                                     <C>                     <C>
National Processing Company,  LLC.                            100                     Ohio
NPC International S.A. de C.V.                                99.6                    Mexico
Caribbean Data Services, Ltd.                                 100                     Delaware
JBH Travel Audit Inc.                                         100                     Colorado
National Processing Company International (Fiji) Limited      100                     Fiji
National Processing Services, Incorporated                    100                     Ohio
NPC Alliance, Inc.                                            100                     Delaware
ABN AMRO Merchant Services, LLC                                70                     Delaware

</TABLE>
LAB/MOATT 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

WINSTON SHROUT, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 18-30228 

D.C. No. 3:15-cr-00438-JO-1 

District of Oregon, 

Portland 

ORDER

Before: GOULD and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

This appeal is remanded to the district court for the limited purpose of 

enabling that court to state, orally or in writing, the reasons for its order denying 

appellant’s motion for bail pending appeal. See 18 U.S.C. § 3143(b); Fed. R. App. 

P. 9(b); United States v. Wheeler, 795 F.2d 839, 841 (9th Cir. 1986) (order).

The district court shall provide the oral or written statement within 10 days 

after the date of this order. See Wheeler, 795 F.2d at 841. Appellant may file a 

supplemental memorandum in support of the motion for bail pending appeal within 

10 days after the filing date of the district court’s statement. Appellee may file its 

response within 10 days after service of appellant’s supplemental memorandum. 

Appellant’s optional reply is due within 7 days after service of the government’s 

response. 

The previously established briefing schedule remains in effect.

FILED

JAN 25 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

Case 3:15-cr-00438-JO Document 184 Filed 01/28/19 Page 1 of 2
LAB/MOATT 2 

The Clerk shall serve this order on the district judge.

Case 3:15-cr-00438-JO Document 184 Filed 01/28/19 Page 2 of 2
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-17-00458-CV

____________________

ROBERT CALDWELL, Appellant

V.

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE INSTITUTIONAL 

DIVISION, Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law

Polk County, Texas

Trial Cause No. CV03461

________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

The trial court signed a final judgment on November 9, 2017. Robert Caldwell

filed a notice of appeal but failed to file a brief. On February 9, 2018, we notified 

the parties that appellant’s brief had not been filed, and we warned the appellant that 

his failure to file a brief could result in a dismissal of the appeal for want of 

prosecution. On February 27, 2018, we notified the parties that the appeal would be 
2

submitted to the Court on March 20, 2018, without briefs and without oral argument. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 39.8.

In the absence of a brief assigning error for appellate review, we dismiss the 

appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1); Tex. R. App. P. 

42.3(b).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

 ________________________________

 LEANNE JOHNSON

 Justice

 

Submitted on March 20, 2018

Opinion Delivered March 29, 2018

Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.
# C_2006255EN.01001001.xml

| 21.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/10

---

Notice of the expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2006/C 255/04)

Further to the publication of a notice of impending expiry (1), following which no request for a review was received, the Commission gives notice that the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will shortly expire.

1

This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 (2) on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community.

2

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Internal gear hubs for bicycles | Japan | Anti-dumping duty | Council Regulation (EC) No 2080/2001 (OJ L 282, 26.10.2001, p. 1). | 26.10.2006 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry

Internal gear hubs for bicycles

Japan

Anti-dumping duty

Council Regulation (EC) No 2080/2001 (OJ L 282, 26.10.2001, p. 1).

26.10.2006

---

(1)  OJ C 30, 7.2.2006, p. 2.

1

(2)  OJ L 56, 6.3.1996, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 2117/2005 (OJ L 340, 23.12.2005, p. 17).

2

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7416
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus BOBBY JACK DELAUDER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Charles H. Haden II, District Judge. (CR-93-22) Submitted: February 19, 2004 Decided: February 25, 2004 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bobby Jack DeLauder, Appellant Pro Se. Sharon Mullen Frazier, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Bobby Jack DeLauder seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying DeLauder’s motion to require the government to allow him to “demonstrate ordinance.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Roy T. West, Respondent, v Country Wide Insurance Company, Appellant.

*659The plaintiff, who was allegedly injured as the result of an automobile accident on May 5, 1977, instituted this action against his insurer to recover no-fault medical benefits, basic economic loss benefits, and uninsured motorist benefits. After issue was joined but before any discovery was held, the defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint on the ground that the plaintiff failed to provide it with timely written notice of the accident. The plaintiff cross-moved for summary judgment on the ground that the defendant, who had canceled the plaintiff’s insurance policy prior to the accident, but conceded in its moving affirmation that the cancellation was subsequently found not to be effective, had waived its right to notice of the accident.

Special Term granted the plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability, apparently on the ground that the defendant had waived written notice of the accident. However, our review indicates that the present record is extremely vague and inconclusive concerning many basic factual issues. Absent from the record are, among other things, a copy of the relevant provisions of the insurance policy, and information concerning the allegedly uninsured motorist, the circumstances of the accident, and the cancellation of the policy. Consequently, neither the plaintiff nor the defendant is entitled to summary judgment at this juncture.

We have not considered the defendant’s other contentions on appeal, which were not raised at Special Term. Lazer, J. P., Niehoff, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2071 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2071

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To extend a quarterly financial report program administered by the 
                         Secretary of Commerce.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT PROGRAM.

    Section 4(b) of the Act entitled ``An Act to amend title 13, United 
States Code, to transfer responsibility for the quarterly financial 
report from the Federal Trade Commission to the Secretary of Commerce, 
and for other purposes'', approved January 12, 1983 (Public Law 97-454; 
13 U.S.C. 91 note), is amended by striking ``September 30, 1998'' and 
inserting ``September 30, 2005''.

            Passed the Senate September 10, 1998.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
105th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2071

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To extend a quarterly financial report program administered by the 
                         Secretary of Commerce.
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

WINSTON SHROUT, 

Defendant. 

PORTLAND DIVISION 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

3: 15-cr-00438-JO 

ORDER 

This matter is before the court to address defendant's 1Vfotion to Dismiss for Treaty Violation 

and Treason Against Constitution Art. VI. [# 31]. I have carefully reviewed the motion and 

supporting memorandum, the Notice of Default of Plea in Bar[# 32], and the Notice of 1099A [# 33] 

filed therewith. The motion and accompanying documents have no merit and present no basis upon 

which defendant could be entitled to relief. Accordingly, the motion [ # 31] is DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED . 

.L 

DATED this 1f:f._ day of April, 2016. 

ORDER 

Case 3:15-cr-00438-JO Document 35 Filed 04/18/16 Page 1 of 1
# L_2010196DE.01002702.xml

| 28.7.2010 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 196/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.7.2010

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 196/27

---

Berichtigung der Richtlinie 2009/77/EG der Kommission vom 1. Juli 2009 zur Änderung der Richtlinie 91/414/EWG des Rates zwecks Aufnahme der Wirkstoffe Chlorsulfuron, Cyromazin, Dimethachlor, Etofenprox, Lufenuron, Penconazol, Triallat und Triflusulfuron

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 172 vom 2. Juli 2009
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 172 vom 2. Juli 2009

Seite 26, Anhang Nummer 287, Spalte „IUPAC-Bezeichnung“:

anstatt:

„1-(2-Chlorophenylsulfonyl)-3-(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)-harnstoff“

muss es heißen:

„1-(2-Chlorphenylsulfonyl-3-(4-methoxyl-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)-harnstoff“.

Seite 32, Anhang Nummer 293, Spalte „Sonderbestimmungen“ Teil B Absatz 3 vierter Gedankenstrich:

anstatt:

| „— | Informationen zum Risiko für fischfressende Säugetiere und das Langzeitrisiko für Säugetiere.“ |
| --- | --- |

„—

Informationen zum Risiko für fischfressende Säugetiere und das Langzeitrisiko für Säugetiere.“

muss es heißen:

| „— | weitere Informationen zum Risiko für fischfressende Säugetiere und das Langzeitrisiko für Säugetiere.“ |
| --- | --- |

„—

weitere Informationen zum Risiko für fischfressende Säugetiere und das Langzeitrisiko für Säugetiere.“

Seite 32, Anhang Nummer 294, Spalte „IUPAC-Bezeichnung“:

anstatt:

„2-[4-Dimethylamino-6-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)-1,3,5-triazin-2-ylcarbamoylsulfamoyl]-m-Toluylsäure“

muss es heißen:

„2-[4-Dimethylamino-6-(2,2,2-trifluorethoxy)-1,3,5-triazin-2-ylcarbamoylsulfamoyl]-m-Toluylsäure“.

---
# C_2006169EN.01000301.xml

| 21.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 169/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 169/3

---

SCHEDULE OF PUBLIC HOLIDAYS FOR 2008

SCHEDULE OF PUBLIC HOLIDAYS FOR

(2006/C 169/03)

| 1st January | Tuesday, New Year's Day |
| --- | --- |
| 2nd January | Wednesday, day following New Year's Day |
| 20th March | Maundy Thursday |
| 21st March | Good Friday |
| 24th March | Easter Monday |
| 1st May | Thursday, Ascension Day |
| 2nd May | Friday, day following Ascension Day |
| 9th May | Friday, Anniversary of the Declaration made by President Robert Schuman in 1950 |
| 12th May | Whit Monday |
| 21st July | Monday, Belgian National Holiday |
| 15th August | Friday, Assumption Day |
| 24th December to | Wednesday | 6 days — Christmas and end of year |
| 31st December | Wednesday |
| TOTAL: 17 days |

1st January

Tuesday, New Year's Day

2nd January

Wednesday, day following New Year's Day

20th March

Maundy Thursday

21st March

Good Friday

24th March

Easter Monday

1st May

Thursday, Ascension Day

2nd May

Friday, day following Ascension Day

9th May

Friday, Anniversary of the Declaration made by President Robert Schuman in 1950

12th May

Whit Monday

21st July

Monday, Belgian National Holiday

15th August

Friday, Assumption Day

24th December to

Wednesday

6 days — Christmas and end of year

31st December

Wednesday

TOTAL: 17 days

The above-mentioned dates also apply to Luxembourg, except that Monday 21 July is replaced by Monday 23 June, Luxembourg National Holiday.

Work will resume as normal on Monday 5 January 2009.

Without prejudice to the schedule of public holidays for 2009, Thursday 1 January 2009 and Friday 2 January 2009 will be holidays.

The Commission reserves the right to modify the decisions, should the needs of service so require.

---
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1869

To authorize the establishment of a disaster mitigation pilot program in

the Small Business Administration.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 26, 1998

Mr. CLELAND (for himself, Mr. COVERDELL, Mr. KERRY, Mr. HOLLINGS, and

Mr. HARKIN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business

A BILL

To authorize the establishment of a disaster mitigation pilot

program in the Small Business Administration.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DISASTER MITIGATION PILOT PROGRAM.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 7(b)(1) of the Small Busi5 ness Act (15 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)) is amended—

6 (1) in subparagraph (B), by adding ‘‘and’’ at

7 the end; and

8 (2) by adding at the end the following:

9 ‘‘(C) during fiscal years 1999 through 2003, to

10 establish a pre-disaster mitigation program to make
2

•S 1869 IS

1 such loans (either directly or in cooperation with

2 banks or other lending institutions through agree3 ments to participate on an immediate or deferred

4 (guaranteed) basis), as the Administrator may deter5 mine to be necessary or appropriate, to enable small

6 businesses to install mitigation devices or to take

7 preventive measures to protect against disasters, in

8 support of a formal mitigation program established

9 by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, ex10 cept that no loan or guarantee shall be extended to

11 a small business under this subparagraph unless the

12 Administration finds that the small business is oth13 erwise unable to obtain credit for the purposes de14 scribed in this subparagraph;’’.

15 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section

16 20 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 631 note) is

17 amended by adding at the end the following:

18 ‘‘(f) DISASTER MITIGATION PILOT PROGRAM.—The

19 following program levels are authorized for loans under

20 section 7(b)(1)(C):

21 ‘‘(1) $15,000,000 for fiscal year 1999.

22 ‘‘(2) $15,000,000 for fiscal year 2000.

23 ‘‘(3) $15,000,000 for fiscal year 2001.

24 ‘‘(4) $15,000,000 for fiscal year 2002.
3

•S 1869 IS

1 ‘‘(5) $15,000,000 for fiscal year 2003.’’.

Æ