alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1999 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                              85
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       87
<ALLOWANCES>                                         5
<INVENTORY>                                         13
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   306
<PP&E>                                           1,287
<DEPRECIATION>                                     786
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,208
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,109
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                          96
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,208
<SALES>                                            323
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,875
<CGS>                                              384
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      752
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,189
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 233
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    701
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       701
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .24
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 18


                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Arthur Andersen LLP

                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   One Financial Plaza
                                                   Hartford CT 06103-2699
                                                   860 280 0500


July 2, 1998

Royal Precision, Inc.
15170 North Hayden Road, Suite 1
Scottsdale, Arizona  85260

Gentlemen:

This letter is written to meet the requirements of Regulation S-K calling for a
letter from a registrant's independent accountants whenever there has been a
change in accounting principle or practice.

During fiscal 1998, Royal Precision, Inc. (the Company) changed from the
Last-In-First-Out (LIFO) method of accounting for inventory to the
First-In-First-Out (FIFO) method of accounting for the Company's golf shaft
subsidiary, FM Precision Golf Manufacturing Corp. (FMP). The Company has given
retroactive effect to the change and the consolidated financial statements for
the prior year have been restated. According to the management of the Company,
this change was made since FMP previously had a debit LIFO reserve. Although the
effect of the debit reserve did not result in FMP's inventory being stated at an
amount in excess of net realizable value, it did not reflect the current
replacement cost of FMP's inventories.

A complete coordinated set of financial and reporting standards for determining
the preferability of accounting principles among acceptable alternative
principles has not been established by the accounting profession. Thus, we
cannot make an objective determination of whether the change in accounting
described in the preceding paragraph is to a preferable method. However, we have
reviewed the pertinent factors, including those related to financial reporting,
in this particular case on a subjective basis, and our opinion stated below is
based on our determination made in this manner.

We are of the opinion that the Company's change in method of accounting for
FMP's inventories is to an acceptable alternative method of accounting, which,
based upon the reasons stated for the change and our discussions with you, is
also preferable under the circumstances in this particular case. In arriving at
this opinion, we have relied on the business judgment and business planning of
your management.


Very truly yours,

/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
**Exhibit** **32.2**

 

**ANTARES PHARMA, INC.**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

 

The undersigned, Robert F. Apple, the Chief Financial Officer of Antares Pharma, Inc. (the “Company”), has executed this Certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”).

 

The undersigned hereby certifies that:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certification as of the 24th day of March, 2009.

 

|   |   |   |   | /s/ Robert F. Apple                                                |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |   | Robert F. Apple

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |   |   |   |                                                               |
1 – OPINION AND ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff, Case No. 6:15-cr-417-MC-1

v. 

OPINION AND ORDER

MICHAEL S. HOLCOMB,

Defendant.

_____________________________

MCSHANE, Judge:

Defendant Michael Holcomb moves to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 

3582(c)(1)(A). ECF No. 138. The Court agrees that “extraordinary and compelling” reasons justify 

reducing the sentence and the Emergency Motion to Reduce Sentence, ECF No. 138, is 

GRANTED.

Mr. Holcomb is not a career criminal. While in custody (serving over half of his expected 

sentence), he has been a model prisoner. The government agrees that Mr. Holcomb is not a danger 

to the community. There is no dispute that Mr. Holcomb suffers from multiple factors (age, high 

blood pressure, hyperlipidemia) putting him at increased risk of COVID-19. As noted by the 

government, the BOP already concluded that Mr. Holcomb qualifies for release to home 

confinement under the First Step Act. And while Mr. Holcomb is currently scheduled to be 

released to home confinement on November 25, 2020, the BOP earlier pushed back that release 

date with no explanation. Even though Mr. Holcomb is set to be released in short order, because 

he meets the requirements for compassionate releasee, his sentence of imprisonment is reduced to 

Case 6:15-cr-00417-MC Document 141 Filed 11/13/20 Page 1 of 2
2 – OPINION AND ORDER

time serviced, with the following added condition: (1) home detention as a condition of supervised 

release for the remaining time left to serve on his original 72-month sentence. 

The Court orders the BOP to release Mr. Holcomb as soon as possible. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 13th day of November, 2020.

_/s Michael McShane__

Michael J. McShane

United States District Judge

Case 6:15-cr-00417-MC Document 141 Filed 11/13/20 Page 2 of 2
LTEP Update 

Questions to be addressed before DOI can determine the most appopririat course of 

action to proceed: 

LEGAL

1. The litigation now underway interrupted the LTEP process. It is difficult to move 

forward in open communication until the litigation is resolved. Time necessary for 

litigation to be resolved is unknown. 

TECHNICAL

The flow and non-flow action for the next 5 years are defined by the EA/FONSI and BO. 

Results of studies conducted to comply with these actions will provide guidance for 

subsequent science. It is too early to use results from these investigations to define 

future LTEP alternatives. We need more time for investigations to produce results that 

will guide future experiments. 

ADMINISTRATIVE

1. The lead agencies for different flow and non-flow actions may follow the line of 

authority of DOI agencies. Negotiations for how this division of tasks will be 

accomplished are underway but as yet unresolved. 

2. There is a paradigm consideration for future adaptive management underway in DOI. 

Consideration is being given to whether movement away from smaller incremental action 

done under EAs is advisable in moving forward under adaptive management. 

3. There are emerging differences of opinion on whether future proposed actions are 

experiments in a research design or management actions with reasonable certainty of 

outcome and effects on resources.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
134469 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 134469 COA: 267866 Saginaw CC: 05-025955-FC ROSHUN MONTELL ROSAS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 19, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

l1022 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 29, 2007

Clerk
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John A. Poserina, Chief Executive Officer of Synergx Systems certify that:

     1. I have  reviewed  this annual  report on Form 10-KSB of Synergx  Systems
Inc.;

     2. Based on my  knowledge,  this annual  report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

     3. Based on my knowledge,  the financial  statements,  and other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects  the  financial  condition,  results  of  operations  and cash flows of
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

     4. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused  such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
procedures  and  presented  in this  annual  report  our  conclusions  about the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period cover by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) Disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting that occurred during  registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected,  or reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

     5. The registrant's other certifying  officers and I have disclosed,  based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial  reporting,  to
the  registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee of  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);

     a)  All  significant  deficiencies  in  material  weakness  the  design  or
operation of internal  controls over  financial  reporting  which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.


Date:    December 26, 2006



         /s/ John A. Poserina
         Chief Financial Officer
# EUR-Lex - 52005XX1230(01) - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52005XX1230(01)

**Communication relating to the revision of the financial provisions applicable to the general budget **

*
Official Journal C 334 , 30/12/2005 P. 0063 - 0063 *

Communication relating to the revision of the financial provisions applicable to the general budget

(2005/C 334/12)

The Steering Board of the European Defence Agency has decided on 16 December 2005, to modify Title III (Procurement) of the financial provisions applicable to the general budget of the Agency (Annex to Decision 2004/658/PESC of the Council, of 13 September 2004, OJ L 300 of 25.9.2004, p. 52). The revised text is published in the following address:

http://www.eda.eu.int/procurement/procurement.htm

--------------------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,165
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,026
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        850
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,041
<PP&E>                                           1,712
<DEPRECIATION>                                     379
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,374
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,925
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,447
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,374
<SALES>                                          6,044
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,044
<CGS>                                            2,079
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,079
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,489
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 583
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,107)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,107)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,107)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.1)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.1)


</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit ____________ 

No. 23-50355 

Summary Calendar 

____________ 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee, 

versus

Garry Lavert Samuels, 

Defendant—Appellant, 

consolidated with 

_____________ 

No. 23-50363 

_____________ 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee, 

versus

Garrie Lavert Samuels, 

Defendant—Appellant. 

______________________________ 

Appeals from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Texas 

United States Court of Appeals 

Fifth Circuit 

FILED 

March 11, 2024 

Lyle W. Cayce 

Clerk 

Case: 23-50355 Document: 60-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/11/2024
2 

USDC Nos. 7:22-CR-264-1, 7:22-CR-270-1 

______________________________ 

Before Smith, Higginson, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender, who was appointed to represent Garrie 

Lavert Samuels in these consolidated appeals, has moved for leave to 

withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 

U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Samuels has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

relevant portions of the records reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeals present no nonfrivolous issue for appellate 

review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the appeals are DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

_____________________ 

*

 This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. 

Case: 23-50355 Document: 60-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/11/2024
THE STATE OF TEXAS

MANDATE

TO THE COUNTY COURT OF LAMAR COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 2nd 

day of September, A.D. 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was 

determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Larry Joe McNeal, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

No. 06-15-00010-CR

Trial Court No. 61963

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Larry Joe McNeal, has adequately indicated his inability to pay 

costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this 

behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Court of Appeals, with 

the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 29th day of October, A.D. 2015.

DEBRA K. AUTREY, Clerk
# L_2009095EN.01000601.xml

| 9.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 95/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 95/6

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 294/2009

of 8 April 2009

fixing the maximum export refund for skimmed milk powder in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 619/2008

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1), and in particular Article 164(2), in conjunction with Article 4, thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 619/2008 of 27 June 2008 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds concerning certain milk products (2) provides for a standing invitation to tender procedure. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 619/2008 of 27 June 2008 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds concerning certain milk products (2) provides for a standing invitation to tender procedure.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 6 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1454/2007 of 10 December 2007 laying down common rules for establishing a tender procedure for fixing export refunds for certain agricultural products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for the tendering period ending on 7 April 2009. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 6 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1454/2007 of 10 December 2007 laying down common rules for establishing a tender procedure for fixing export refunds for certain agricultural products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for the tendering period ending on 7 April 2009.

| (3) | The Management Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its Chair, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Management Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its Chair,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the standing invitation to tender opened by Regulation (EC) No 619/2008, for the tendering period ending on 7 April 2009, the maximum amount of refund for the product and destinations referred to in Article 1(c) and in Article 2 of that Regulation shall be EUR 22,00/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 9 April 2009.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 8 April 2009.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 168, 28.6.2008, p. 20.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 325, 11.12.2007, p. 69.

3

---
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of SRS Labs, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Thomas C.K. Yuen, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:

|Dated: March 31, 2003 |  | By: | /s/THOMAS C.K. YUENThomas C.K. Yuen Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|--------------------- |  | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SRS Labs and will be retained by SRS Labs and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks