alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.3
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Colmena Corp. on Form 10-QSB for
the period  ending  June 30,  2004 as filed  with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission on the date hereof,  I, Anthony Q. Joffe,  Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Anthony Q. Joffe
Anthony Q. Joffe
President and Chief Executive Officer

August 12, 2004
**Exhibit 32.1****WRITTENSTATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350     Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer ofNicholas Financial, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended September 30, 2005 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/Peter L. Vosotas Peter L. Vosotas  President and Chief Executive Officer  Dated: November 10, 2005
<PAGE>




                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

                            STATEMENT UNDER OATH FOR
                           PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT


I, Kanwar J.S. Chadha, Ph.D., certify that:

         The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2003
of Entrada Networks, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained
in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2003 of
Entrada Networks, Inc fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Entrada Networks, Inc.


                                           Subscribed and sworn to
                                           before me this 23 day of May


/s/ Kanwar Chadha                            /s/  Gayle Bryant
----------------------------------         -----------------------------
Name:    Kanwar J.S. Chadha, Ph.D.         Notary Public
Date:    May 23, 2003
                                                   Seal
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-10889

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Gaston Salazar-Sanchez, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:21-CR-49-1

Before Higginbotham, Higginson, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Gaston Salazar-Sanchez was convicted of illegal reentry after 

deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), and possession of a firearm by 

an illegal alien, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(5)(A). On appeal, he

argues, citing Nat’l Fed’n of Indep. Bus. v. Sebelius, 567 U.S. 519 (2012), that 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 22, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-10889 Document: 00516212294 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/22/2022
No. 21-10889

2

§ 922(g) should be construed to require proof that movement of the firearm

across state lines was caused by the defendant’s conduct, proof that the 

firearm crossed state lines in a commercial transaction, or proof that the 

movement occurred in the recent past. Salazar-Sanchez concedes that his 

argument is foreclosed, but he seeks to preserve the issue for future review. 

Agreeing that relief is foreclosed under United States v. Alcantar, 733 F.3d 143 

(5th Cir. 2013), the Government moves for summary affirmance or, 

alternatively, for an extension of time in which to file a merits brief.

The parties are correct that Salazar-Sanchez’s argument is foreclosed. 

See Alcantar, 733 F.3d at 145-46; see generally Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 

406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969). Accordingly, the Government’s motion 

for summary affirmance is GRANTED. Its alternative motion for an 

extension of time is DENIED. The judgment is AFFIRMED.

Case: 21-10889 Document: 00516212294 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/22/2022
Merrithew Decl. 

Exhibit B, Page 1 of 16
Merrithew Decl. 

Exhibit B, Page 2 of 16
Merrithew Decl. 

Exhibit B, Page 3 of 16
Merrithew Decl. 

Exhibit B, Page 4 of 16
Merrithew Decl. 

Exhibit B, Page 5 of 16
Merrithew Decl. 

Exhibit B, Page 6 of 16

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 622-2 Filed 05/31/16 Page 6 of 16
Merrithew Decl. 

Exhibit B, Page 7 of 16

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 622-2 Filed 05/31/16 Page 7 of 16
Merrithew Decl. 

Exhibit B, Page 8 of 16

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 622-2 Filed 05/31/16 Page 8 of 16
Merrithew Decl. 

Exhibit B, Page 9 of 16

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 622-2 Filed 05/31/16 Page 9 of 16
Merrithew Decl. 

Exhibit B, Page 10 of 16

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 622-2 Filed 05/31/16 Page 10 of 16
Merrithew Decl. 

Exhibit B, Page 11 of 16

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 622-2 Filed 05/31/16 Page 11 of 16
Merrithew Decl. 

Exhibit B, Page 12 of 16

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 622-2 Filed 05/31/16 Page 12 of 16
Merrithew Decl. 

Exhibit B, Page 13 of 16

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 622-2 Filed 05/31/16 Page 13 of 16
Merrithew Decl. 

Exhibit B, Page 14 of 16

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 622-2 Filed 05/31/16 Page 14 of 16
Merrithew Decl. 

Exhibit B, Page 15 of 16

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 622-2 Filed 05/31/16 Page 15 of 16
Merrithew Decl. 

Exhibit B, Page 16 of 16

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 622-2 Filed 05/31/16 Page 16 of 16
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

PORTLAND DIVISION 

BARBARA SHIRED and 

KRISTIN L. SOTO, 

No. 3:14-cv-02054-ST 

 Plaintiffs, 

 OPINION AND ORDER 

v. 

STATE OF OREGON, 

 Defendant. 

MOSMAN, J., 

On March 8, 2015, Magistrate Judge Stewart issued her Findings and Recommendation 

(“F&R”) [14] in the above-captioned case recommending that I grant defendants’ Motion to 

Dismiss [6]. Neither party filed objections. 

DISCUSSION 

The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may 

file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge, 

but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to 

make a de novo determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or 

recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). However, the court 

is not required to review, de novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of 

the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See 

Case 3:14-cv-02054-MO Document 16 Filed 03/30/15 Page 1 of 2
Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna–Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 

(9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F&R 

depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject, 

or modify any part of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). 

Upon review, I agree with Judge Stewart’s recommendation, and I ADOPT the F&R [14] 

as my own opinion. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this 30 day of March, 2015. 

 /s/ Michael W. Mosman 

 MICHAEL W. MOSMAN 

United States District Judge 

Case 3:14-cv-02054-MO Document 16 Filed 03/30/15 Page 2 of 2
# L_2009084EN.01004401.xml

| 31.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 84/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 84/44

---

COMMISSION DECISION

of 30 March 2009

appointing 12 members of the European Statistical Advisory Committee

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/304/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Decision No 234/2008/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2008 establishing the European Statistical Advisory Committee and repealing Council Decision 91/116/EEC (1), and in particular Article 4(1)(a) thereof,

After consultation of the Council,

After consultation of the European Parliament,

Whereas:

| (1) | The European Statistical Advisory Committee comprises 24 members. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The European Statistical Advisory Committee comprises 24 members.

| (2) | According to Article 4(1) of Decision No 234/2008/EC, 12 members shall be appointed by the Commission, after consulting the European Parliament and the Council. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

According to Article 4(1) of Decision No 234/2008/EC, 12 members shall be appointed by the Commission, after consulting the European Parliament and the Council.

| (3) | Member States have provided the Commission with a list of candidates with a well-established qualification in the field of statistics. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Member States have provided the Commission with a list of candidates with a well-established qualification in the field of statistics.

| (4) | In the appointment of those 12 members, the Commission shall endeavour to ensure that they represent, in equal measure, users, respondents, and other stakeholders in Community statistics (including the scientific community, the social partners and civil society), |
| --- | --- |

(4)

In the appointment of those 12 members, the Commission shall endeavour to ensure that they represent, in equal measure, users, respondents, and other stakeholders in Community statistics (including the scientific community, the social partners and civil society),

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The persons named in the Annex are hereby appointed as members of the European Statistical Advisory Committee for a term of five years.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 30 March 2009.

For the Commission

Joaquín ALMUNIA

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 73, 15.3.2008, p. 13.

1

---

ANNEX

Karl Andrea FEMRELL

Ladislav KABÁT

Lea KAUPPI

Irena E. KOTOWSKA

Denise Anne LIEVESLEY

Hristina MITREVA

Luca PAOLAZZI

Robert ROCHEFORT

Julio RODRĺGUEZ LÓPEZ

Ineke STOOP

Hartmut TOFAUTE

Brendan WALSH

---
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1744 

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 

at 1300 Victoria Street in Laredo, Texas, as the ‘‘George P. Kazen 

Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’, and to designate the 

jury room in that Federal building and United States courthouse as 

the ‘‘Marcel C. Notzon II Jury Room’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 13, 2015 

Mr. CUELLAR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 1300 Victoria Street in Laredo, Texas, 

as the ‘‘George P. Kazen Federal Building and United 

States Courthouse’’, and to designate the jury room in 

that Federal building and United States courthouse as 

the ‘‘Marcel C. Notzon II Jury Room’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BUILDING DESIGNATION. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Federal building and United 

5 States courthouse located at 1300 Victoria Street in La6 redo, Texas, shall be known and designated as the 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1744 IH

1 ‘‘George P. Kazen Federal Building and United States 

2 Courthouse’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the Federal building and United States court6 house referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be 

7 a reference to the ‘‘George P. Kazen Federal Building and 

8 United States Courthouse’’. 

9 SEC. 2. JURY ROOM DESIGNATION. 

10 (a) DESIGNATION.—The jury room located in the 

11 Federal building and United States courthouse referred 

12 to in section 1 shall be known and designated as the 

13 ‘‘Marcel C. Notzon II Jury Room’’. 

14 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg15 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

16 States to the jury room referred to in subsection (a) shall 

17 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Marcel C. Notzon 

18 II Jury Room’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Insect Control and Cotton Disease Research: College Station, TX
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area College Station, Texas Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center Insect Control and Cotton Disease Research Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Collaborations The Insect Control and Cotton Disease Research has a long and productive history of collaborative research involving stakeholders.  Current collaborators and projects:  Influence of Soil Microbiota and Entomopathogenic Nematodes on Cotton Defensive Chemical Production Partners in Crime: Pathobiome of Fusarium Cotton Wilt Pathogen  Pheromone Components of the Pecan Weevil


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### GOLDSCHMIDT, Appellant, v. NEW YORK STEAM CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department,

June 29, 1896.)

Action by Georgette Goldschmidt against New York Steam Company. Plaintiff appeals from an order denying motion for a preliminary injunction. See 40 N. Y. Supp. 169. O. Steele, for appellant. J. W. Hawes, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

In view of the nature of the business in which the defendant in this action was engaged, and the quasi public character of its services, and the inconvenience to a portion of the public which would have resulted from the granting of a preliminary injunction in this action at the season of the year at which it was applied for, we are of the opinion that the _ court below was justified in denying the motion; and for that reason the order appealed from should be affirmed, without costs to either party, but with leave to the plaintiff to renew his motion for a preliminary injunction, provided such renewal is made within a reasonable time after the announcement of our decision upon this appeal.
#### COLWELL v. COLWELL.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 14, 1896.)

No opinion. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, without costs, upon the defendant stipulating (if required by plaintiff by notice in writing, to be given five days after notice of entry of order hereon) to proceed before the referee upon the new issues in like manner as if the new issues had been in the orignal answer at the time when the order of reference was made, and, further, that all proceedings already, had before the referee stand in full force and etiect.
1 –ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

GARY ALLEN HARRINGTON,

Plaintiff, Case No. 1:16-cv-00200-CL

v. ORDER

LARRY PAUL MENTEER, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________

MCSHANE, Judge:

Before the court are two matters: (1) Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke’s Report and 

Recommendation (ECF No. 68), and (2) Plaintiff’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order 

(ECF No. 77).

Because Plaintiff filed objections to the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 76), I 

have reviewed the file of this case de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c); McDonnell Douglas 

Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). I conclude the report 
2 –ORDER

is correct and adopt its findings and recommendation. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 

59) is GRANTED with prejudice and without leave to amend.

Plaintiff also moved for a Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. 77). Because I find the

Plaintiff failed to establish by a clear showing that: (1) he is likely to succeed on the merits; (3) 

he is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief; and (3) the balance of 

equities tips in his favor, and that an injunction is in the public interest, the motion for 

Temporary Restraining Order is DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 7th day of June, 2017.

_____/s/ Michael J. McShane_____

Michael J. McShane

United States District Judge
<PAGE>



                                  EXHIBIT 99.2

                            STATEMENT UNDER OATH FOR
                           PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT


I, Davinder Sethi, certify that:

         The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31,
2002 of Entrada Networks, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information
contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31,
2002 of Entrada Networks, Inc fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Entrada Networks, Inc.


                                             Subscribed and sworn to
                                             before me this 21 day of November


 /s/ Davinder Sethi                          /s/ Matthew Schorr
------------------------------               -----------------------------------
Name: Davinder Sethi                         Notary Public of New Jersey
Principal Financial Officer                  Commission expires November 7, 2006
Date: November 21, 2002                            Seal



                                       26
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 10-Q FOR
THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       11
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (11)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (11)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (11)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 171 

To repeal the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection 

Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2015 

Mr. SMITH of Nebraska introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committees 

on Agriculture, Energy and Commerce, the Judiciary, the Budget, Oversight and Government Reform, Ways and Means, and Small Business, for 

a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 

consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To repeal the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and 

Consumer Protection Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL. 

4 The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer 

5 Protection Act (Public Law 111–203) is repealed and the 

6 provisions of law amended by such Act are revived or re7 stored as if such Act had not been enacted. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS