alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PATHOGENESIS CORPORATION FOR THE
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       3,147,983
<SECURITIES>                                54,976,517
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,512,033
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                  9,891,098
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            77,768,147
<PP&E>                                      25,151,118
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,943,806
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             109,543,201
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,297,138
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,273
<OTHER-SE>                                  89,606,161
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               109,543,201
<SALES>                                     42,921,866
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            43,215,430
<CGS>                                        6,946,023
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               47,078,922
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               105,537
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F2>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             281,496
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,035,644)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,035,644)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,035,644)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)
<FN>
<F1>THE AMOUNT OF RECEIVABLES REPORTED IS NET OF $1,391,824 OF ALLOWANCES.
<F2>THE TOTAL COSTS INCLUDE LOSS PROVISION OF $173,175.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    Exhibit 11.1

             STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        Three months ended
                                                             March 31,
                                                     1997                 1996
                                                     -------------------------
<S>                                               <C>                <C>
Weighted Average Common and
     Common Equivalent Shares:

Weighted Average Common Stock
     Outstanding During the Period                 6,278,594          6,205,842

Weighted Average Common Equivalent:
     Shares                                          674,220            970,285
                                                  ----------         ----------
                                                   6,952,814          7,176,127
                                                  ----------         ----------
Net Income                                        $  388,274         $  683,185
                                                  ==========         ==========

Net Income Per Common Share                       $     0.06         $     0.10
                                                  ==========         ==========
</TABLE>


FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        Three months ended
                                                             March 31,
                                                     1997                 1996
                                                     -------------------------
<S>                                               <C>                <C>
Weighted Average Common and
     Common Equivalent Shares:

Weighted Average Common Stock
     Outstanding During the Period                 6,278,594          6,205,842

Weighted Average Common Equivalent:
     Shares                                          674,072            969,803
                                                  ----------         ----------
                                                   6,952,666          7,175,645
                                                  ----------         ----------
Net Income                                        $  388,274         $  683,185
                                                  ==========         ==========

Net Income Per Common Share                       $     0.06         $     0.10
                                                  ==========         ==========
</TABLE>


                                       15
To: TWG Members 

From: Randall Peterson, Budget Ad Hoc Chair 

Subject: 2004 AMP Budget 

At the November 7-8, 2002 TWG meeting, we discussed the potential recommendation 

by the TWG to the AMWG of a detailed 2004 line item budget. Several TWG members 

expressed a need for more information before they were willing to vote on a motion to 

send such a recommendation to the AMWG. The AMWG will again address the 2004 

budget at their January 2003 meeting. We scheduled a December 20, 2002 TWG 

conference call / phone poll, after TWG members had some additional time to consider 

proposed changes to the AMP budget originally presented at the July 2002 AMWG 

meeting. Absent an AMWG recommendation to the Secretary of the Interior, 

Reclamation and the USGS would manage the AMP budget using previous guidance and 

comments by the AMWG and TWG. 

Several budget summaries are attached to this cover memo, along with an explanation of 

the proposed modifications to the budget presented at the July 2002 AMWG meeting. 

These attachments are intended to inform the TWG regarding the expenditure of power 

revenues, potential appropriations from DOI agencies for tribal participation and 

consultation, and additional appropriations through the USGS for experimental research. 

Four tables summarize budget discussions and comments to date. Table 1 is a budget 

summary table that lists the projects presented to the AWMG in July 2002. Table 2 lists 

the revised budget recommended by the TWG ad hoc committee at the November 7-8, 

2002 meeting, and Table 3 lists the differences between these first two tables. Table 4 

was prepared by GCMRC and lists the comments received from AMWG/TWG members 

and responses to those comments. The comments were meant to be all-inclusive from 

our discussions at TWG, AMWG, and ad hoc meetings, but there may be comments on 

the use of appropriations that are not listed. Following Table 4 is a narrative description 

of the differences displayed in Table 3. This narrative details the logic and rationale 

behind these proposed revisions. 

In proposing the use of appropriated funds for 2004, the ad hoc committee recognized 

that a decision has not yet been made on the proposed experimental flow program. 

However, the committee recommends that any such appropriation requests granted in 

2004 be applied to the experimental flow fund to finance research in future years, 

particularly to the resource areas of humpback chub and sediment conservation. 

However, adjustments to the budget could be made in 2004 if the AMWG deems specific 

research activities more important in priority or sequence that the conducting of 

experimental flows research. Examples of these type of research activities were included 

in the 2004 budget originally proposed to the AMWG last July (Table 1).
SUBSIDIARIES:

     Intelligroup Asia Private,  Ltd., a corporation formed pursuant to the laws
of India and 99.8% owned and wholly-controlled subsidiary of Intelligroup, Inc.

     Intelligroup  Australia Pty Limited,  a corporation  formed pursuant to the
laws of Australia and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Intelligroup, Inc.

     Empower,  Inc., a Michigan  corporation  and a  wholly-owned  subsidiary of
Intelligroup, Inc.

     Intelligroup  Europe Limited,  a corporation formed pursuant to the laws of
the United Kingdom and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Intelligroup, Inc.

          CPI Resources, a corporation formed pursuant to the laws of the United
          Kingdom and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Intelligroup Europe Limited.

          CPI Consulting  Limited,  a corporation formed pursuant to the laws of
          the United  Kingdom  and 70% owned by CPI  Resources  and 30% owned by
          Intelligroup Europe Limited.

     Intelligroup  Hong Kong Private Ltd., a corporation  formed pursuant to the
laws of Hong Kong and a 99% owned  subsidiary  of  Intelligroup,  Inc.  and a 1%
owned subsidiary of Intelligroup New Zealand Limited.

     Intelligroup  Japan,  Ltd., a  corporation  formed  pursuant to the laws of
Japan and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Intelligroup, Inc.

     Intelligroup New Zealand Limited, a corporation formed pursuant to the laws
of New Zealand and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Intelligroup, Inc.

     Intelligroup Nordic AB, a corporation formed pursuant to the laws of Sweden
and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Intelligroup, Inc.

     Intelligroup  Nordic  A/S, a  corporation  formed  pursuant  to the laws of
Denmark and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Intelligroup, Inc.

     Intelligroup  Singapore Private Ltd., a corporation  formed pursuant to the
laws of Singapore and wholly-owned subsidiary of Intelligroup, Inc.

     Intelligroup de Venezuela,  C.A., a corporation formed pursuant to the laws
of Venezuela and wholly-owned subsidiary of Intelligroup, Inc.
# C_2009284EN.01001601.xml

| 25.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/16

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5663 — AVIO/SECI-E/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 284/04

On 18 November 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only Italian language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5663. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5663. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                        5

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                              323,279
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     3,611,370
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (158,000)
<INVENTORY>                                       2,596,095
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  6,428,125
<PP&E>                                            2,295,928
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (1,731,111)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    8,664,307
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             3,836,514
<BONDS>                                              11,280
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                            125,496
<OTHER-SE>                                        4,360,020
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      8,664,307
<SALES>                                          11,342,759
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 11,342,759
<CGS>                                             6,414,574
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     4,093,374
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  132,661
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     702,150
<INCOME-TAX>                                         12,110
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 690,040
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                        690,040
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0.05



</TABLE>
Exhibit
                                        10.6

 

MOUNTAIN
CREST ACQUISITION CORP
311 West 43rd Street, 12th Floor
New York, NY 10036

 

[_______],
2020

 

Sunlight
Global Investment LLC
311 West 43rd Street, 12th Floor
New York, NY 10036

 

Ladies
and Gentlemen:

 

This
letter will confirm our agreement that, commencing on the effective date (the “Effective Date”) of
the registration statement (the “Registration Statement”) for the initial public offering (the “IPO”)
of the securities of Mountain Crest Acquisition Corp (the “Company”) and continuing until the earlier
of (i) the consummation by the Company of an initial business combination or (ii) the Company’s liquidation (in each case
as described in the Registration Statement) (such earlier date hereinafter referred to as the “Termination Date”),
Sunlight Global Investment LLC (“Sunlight”) shall make available to the Company certain office space,
secretarial and administrative services as may be required by the Company from time to time, situated at 311 West 43rd Street,
12th Floor, New York, NY 10036 (or any successor location). In exchange therefore, the Company shall pay Sunlight a sum not to
exceed $10,000 per month, respectively, on the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter until the Termination Date. Sunlight
hereby agrees that it does not have any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies that may be set aside
in a trust account (the “Trust Account”) that may be established by the Company for the benefit of
the Company’s public stockholders upon the consummation of the IPO as described in the Registration Statement (“Claim”)
and hereby waives any Claim it may have in the future as a result of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements
with the Company and will not seek recourse against the Trust Account for any reason whatsoever.


	 

	 
	 

	Very truly yours,
	 

	 
	 

	MOUNTAIN
CREST ACQUISITION CORP
	 

	 


	 

	By:	 
	 

	Name:
Suying Liu
	 

	Title:
Chief Executive Officer


 

	 AGREED
                                      TO AND ACCEPTED BY:


	 
	SUNLIGHT GLOBAL
INVESTMENT LLC
	 
	By: 	 
	Name: Suying Liu
	Title:
                                      Member
# C_2009162EN.01000401.xml

| 15.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 162/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 162/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5431 — ADM/Schokinag)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 162/02

On 27 May 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5431. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5431. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMISSION, No. 3:16-cv-00438-PK

Plaintiff, ORDER

v.

AEQUITAS MANAGEMENT, LLC; AEQUITAS

HOLDINGS, LLC; AEQUITAS COMMERCIAL

FINANCE, LLC; AEQUITAS CAPITAL

MANAGEMENT, INC.; AEQUITAS

INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, LLC; ROBERT

J. JESENIK; BRIAN A. OLIVER; and N. SCOTT

GILLIS,

Defendants. 

//

//

//

//
HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued a Findings & Recommendation (“F&R”) [564] on 

December 11, 2017, recommending that the Court deny Weider Health & Fitness and Bruce 

Forman’s (collectively “Weider/Forman”) motion for entry of judgment, to certify prior orders 

for appeal, and to stay prior orders pending appeal [552]. Weider/Forman have timely filed 

objections [572] to the F&R. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). 

When a party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge’s F&R the district court must 

make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge’s report. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. ReynaTapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).

The Court has carefully considered Weider/Forman’s objections and concludes there is 

no basis to modify the F&R. The Court has also reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de 

novo and finds no errors in the Magistrate Judge’s F&R.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak’s F&R [564], and therefore, 

Weider/Forman’s motion for entry of judgment, to certify prior orders for appeal, and to stay 

prior orders pending appeal [552] is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this day of , 2018.

____________________________________

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ

United States District Judge
End of Fiscal Year 2018 reporting

Technical Work Group

March 14, 2019

Tara Ashby

Bureau of Reclamation

Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program 
GCDAMP Budget FY 16-18

GCDAMP Budget - Power Revenues

FY 16 = $10,755,000 (0% CPI) 

Reclamation = $2,083,000

GCMRC = $8,672,000 

FY 17 = $10,916,000 (1.5% CPI)

Reclamation = $2,110,000

GCMRC = $8,806,000

FY 18 = $11,156,000 (2.2% CPI)

Reclamation = $2,231,000

GCMRC = $8,925,000

* Values rounded to nearest $1,000
Totals
AMWG and TWG
Reclamation Administration
Cultural Resources
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

ORDER - 1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT TACOMA 

ARTURO ALEXANDER 

BARRIENTOS, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

BOARDMAN MORROS COUNTY 

OREGON STATE, et al., 

 Defendants. 

CASE NO. 2:15-cv-1641-RJB-DWC 

ORDER 

The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge David 

W. Christel, objections to the Report and Recommendation, if any, and the remaining record, 

does hereby find and ORDER: 

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. 

(2) This matter is TRANSFERRED for all further proceedings to the District of 

Oregon. 

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff and to the Hon. 

David W. Christel. 

Dated this 20th day of November, 2015. . 

 

 ROBERT J. BRYAN

 United States District Judge

A

Case 2:15-cv-02197-AC Document 7 Filed 11/20/15 Page 1 of 1
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 JANUARY 6, 2011

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 ________________________

 No. 10-11756 

Non-Argument Calendar

 ________________________

 D.C. Docket No. 8:01-cr-00180-EAK-2

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ALEC V. MATHEWS,

a.k.a. Alex Matthews,

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

 Appeal from the United States District Court

 for the Middle District of Florida

 ________________________

(January 6, 2011)

Before TJOFLAT, BARKETT and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Alec Mathews, a federal prisoner acting pro se, appeals from the denial of
his motion to file a second direct appeal out of time. Although we previously

affirmed Mathews’ drug and firearm convictions on direct appeal in 2003, he now

argues that he should be permitted to file a second direct appeal out of time,

because the district court failed to notify him that it had denied his motion—filed

after trial but before sentencing—to obtain an expert evaluation of a videotape

introduced by the government at his trial. However, Mathews’ argument fails

because the record establishes that he did in fact receive actual notice of the

district court’s denial of his motion, as he expressly acknowledged the denial at

his sentencing hearing. Accordingly, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

2