alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Livestock Issues Research: Lubbock, TX
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    NewsletterSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Lubbock, Texas Cropping Systems Research Laboratory Livestock Issues Research Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Collaborations The Livestock Issues Research has a long and productive history of collaborative research involving stakeholders.  Current collaborators and projects:


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
# L_2009323EN.01006601.xml

| 10.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 323/66 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 323/66

---

COMMISSION DECISION

of 7 December 2009

on extending the availability period of the exceptional Community financial assistance to Kosovo

(2009/918/EU)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Decision 2006/880/EC of 30 November 2006 providing exceptional Community financial assistance to Kosovo (1), and in particular to Article 1(3),

Whereas:

| (1) | The availability of the exceptional Community financial assistance to Kosovo (2), according to the above mentioned Decision, expires on 11 December 2009. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The availability of the exceptional Community financial assistance to Kosovo (2), according to the above mentioned Decision, expires on 11 December 2009.

| (2) | Article 1(3) of Decision 2006/880/EC foresees the possibility for the Commission to extend the availability period by a maximum of one year. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 1(3) of Decision 2006/880/EC foresees the possibility for the Commission to extend the availability period by a maximum of one year.

| (3) | The availability period should be extended by one year in order to complete the financial assistance programme. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The availability period should be extended by one year in order to complete the financial assistance programme.

| (4) | The Economic and Financial Committee has been duly consulted on this extension, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The Economic and Financial Committee has been duly consulted on this extension,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The availability period of the exceptional Community financial assistance to Kosovo is extended by one additional year, until 11 December 2010.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 7 December 2009.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 339, 6.12.2006, p. 36.

1

(2)  Under United Nations Security Council Resolution No 1244/1999 (UNSCR 1244/99) of 10.6.1999.

2

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         August 25, 2021.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on August 18, 2021, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add First-Class Package Service Contract 116 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2021-128, CP2021-133.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2021-18318 Filed 8-24-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
1 – OPINION AND ORDER 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

EUGENE DIVISION 

ROBERT E.1

,

Plaintiff, Case No. 6:16-cv-00117-JE 

v. 

OPINION & ORDER

NANCY A. BERRYHILL, 

Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, 

Defendant. 

MOSMAN, J., 

On August 13, 2018, Magistrate Judge John Jelderks issued his Findings and 

Recommendation (F&R) [35], recommending that the Commissioner’s decision be AFFIRMED. 

Plaintiff Robert Drake Ewbank filed objections [39]. The Commissioner filed a response [40]. 

DISCUSSION 

The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may 

file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge, 

but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to 

make a de novo determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or 

recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). However, the court 

1

 In the interest of privacy, this opinion uses only the first name and the initial of the last name of 

the nongovernmental party in this case. 
2 – OPINION AND ORDER 

is not required to review, de novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of 

the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See 

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 

(9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F&R 

depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject, 

or modify any part of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). 

Upon review, I agree with Judge Jelderks’s recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R [35] 

as my own opinion. The Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED and this case is dismissed with 

prejudice. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this ____ day of September, 2018. 

_______________________

MICHAEL W. MOSMAN

Chief United States District Judge 

26

 /s/ Michael W. Mosman
#### Robert J. WRIGHT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 83-6869.

Oct. 1, 1984.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. •

Denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

HOWARD H. MORRICAL, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

ATLAS COPCO COMPRESSORS, LLC, et 

al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 14-cv-52-SMY-DGW 

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Vacate Memorandum and 

Order and Leave to File Response (Doc. 197). For the following reasons, the Court DENIES the 

motion. 

 On April 7, 2015, defendant Georgia-Pacific Corporation filed a Motion to Transfer Case 

(Doc. 188). Plaintiff’s response was due on or before April 21, 2015. Plaintiff failed to timely 

respond or to request an extension of time to do so. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(g), on June 1, 

2015, the Court deemed Plaintiff’s failure to respond an admission of the merits and granted the 

Motion to Transfer Case (Doc. 196). Plaintiff has now filed a Rule 60(b) motion asking that the 

Court vacate its order transferring this case. Plaintiff asserts that his failure to file a response 

was excusable neglect resulting from “an inundation of dozens of questionable Daubert and 

summary judgment motions” in other cases pending before the Court. 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(1) a party may move to vacate an order 

for excusable neglect. Robb v. Norfolk & Western Ry. Co., 122 F.3d 354, 359 (7th Cir. 1997). 

The district court has “discretion to consider the equities and then determine whether a missed 

filing deadline attributable to an attorney’s negligence is (or is not) ‘excusable neglect.’” Id. at 

Case 3:15-cv-00964-SI Document 198 Filed 06/01/15 Page 1 of 2
2

359. “‘Excusable neglect’ requires something more than a simple failure to meet the deadline 

due to a busy schedule.” United States v. Dumas, 94 F.3d 286, 289 (7th Cir. 1996). 

Here, the explanation given by Plaintiff’s counsel for failing to respond for more than a 

month past the deadline does not satisfy the Dumas standard for excusable neglect. Therefore, 

Plaintiff’s Motion to Vacate Memorandum and Order and Leave to File Response (Doc. 197) is 

DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: June 1, 2015 

 s/ Staci M. Yandle 

 STACI M. YANDLE 

 DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:15-cv-00964-SI Document 198 Filed 06/01/15 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1

      Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

                 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Anthony Q. Joffe, certify to the best of my knowledge based upon a review of
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of NetWorth Technologies, Inc. for the
quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the "Form 10-Q"), that the Form 10-Q fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of NetWorth Technologies, Inc. for the periods covered by the Form
10-Q.

Dated:  November 14, 2005


By:      /s/ Anthony Q. Joffe
         -----------------------------------------
         Anthony Q. Joffe, Chief Executive Officer

I, Anthony Q. Joffe, certify to the best of my knowledge based upon a review of
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of NetWorth Technologies, Inc. for the
quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the "Form 10-Q"), that the Form 10-Q fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of NetWorth Technologies, Inc. for the periods covered by the
Form 10-Q.

Dated:  November 14 2005


By:      /s/ Anthony Q. Joffe
         -----------------------------------------
         Anthony Q. Joffe, Chief Financial Officer
" . "':' 

J_MerrithaN. OSB No. 074564 

Emril: Jae@!nriegal.a:m 

Levi MElTithaN HCJ'tf PC 

610 9N Alder 9reEi. SJite415 

F\lrtla"ld. Oregon 97205 

Tat!phonl! (971) 229-1241 

Famil« (971) 544-7092 

UNI TED SfATES 01 STRI CT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON' . 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Cae No.: 3: 1&CR-00051-BR-26 . 

Plaintiff, 

va AMENDED WAIVER OF 

APPEARANCE 

JAKE RYAN. at aI., 

., . - '., Detfll"daXs.· " •.. 

Dfftndat J!lkeRyil\ by B1dttrough~ JfaBM~rithBN. herliby kl1CMlillly aOO 

voh......ilywaiv.l1s.-aIiQui the SituJccnfern:eset for J.I'B 15,2018, st 9:30AM. 

. . 

DasDnt rflOOlJ'llzestha tt1$wavEr isbEing aJl:rrittl!!d peel thedeedineset by theCourt. 

Hallet., Mr. Ry81 was I'd grcnta:I pretri. relamU'ltiI aftEr thit deEliine. He &lksthaCourt to 

I1sll1tilTlEiy wava-. 

"' 

"' 

II' 

"' 

~v 0;:60 nHl 9l0l-60-Nnr 

F\ve 1-WAIVER OF APFEARANCE 

lOO 'd 

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 661 Filed 06/09/16 Page 1 of 2
I • .ticeRyil\ knowingly II1d voloota'ily Wliverrrt pii;1Sln1i11lPJ*1alaiUi thaC8!IUtctUS 

CXJr'IEnn:a_ for .u.15:2016. I hafebeen 8MSBf ttB I hatesri~ to bepn.d at the 

sausmnfaence. cnj Il.I'I1enItaI:I that Iwill n:x bepll'8Dl'"8ly pre5lri on tha court ttae By 

si911'V4 be!ow,ll.I,derstn:Jthat I aTlCOI_Wirgto bepr&!lfl1through my Ettorney, JiaB 

Marithew. 

DATED this 9:. da.t d .lJne. 2016 

By: /s:hmMaIitbaN 

JEll!leMerrlth8iN, OSB No. 074584 

AttOlTll¥ for JIike Ryan . 

P;g82-WAIVER a=APPEARANCE LIM MERRITHEW HOASr PC 

810 9NAlder Sb1IIt. St.415 FUtln. Oregan 91205 

r. n n . rI 

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 661 Filed 06/09/16 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1696 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1696

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to extend 
 the tariff preference level on imports of certain cotton and man-made 
fiber, fabric, apparel, and made-up goods from Bahrain under the United 
                  States-Bahrain Free Trade Agreement.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 26, 2015

   Ms. Graham (for herself and Mr. Miller of Florida) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to extend 
 the tariff preference level on imports of certain cotton and man-made 
fiber, fabric, apparel, and made-up goods from Bahrain under the United 
                  States-Bahrain Free Trade Agreement.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TARIFF PREFERENCE LEVEL ON IMPORTS OF CERTAIN 
              COTTON AND MAN-MADE FIBER, FABRIC, APPAREL, AND MADE-UP 
              GOODS FROM BAHRAIN UNDER THE UNITED STATES-BAHRAIN FREE 
              TRADE AGREEMENT.

    (a) In General.--U.S. Note 13 to subchapter XIV of chapter 99 of 
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended--
            (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``2015'' and inserting ``2025''; 
                and
                    (B) by striking ``January 1, 2016, through July 31, 
                2016'' and inserting ``January 1, 2026, through July 
                31, 2026''; and
            (2) in the matter following paragraph (d), by striking 
        ``July 31, 2016'' and inserting ``July 31, 2026''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply with respect to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after January 1, 2016.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

____________________________________

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

v. ) Criminal No. 10-0293 (PLF)

)

GEORGE KELLY, )

)

Defendant. )

____________________________________)

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

The United States Probation Office filed a Probation Petition [Dkt. 41] on June 9, 

2017, requesting that defendant George Kelly’s conditions of supervised release by modified to 

include a thirty-day term of home detention and to require that he provide third-party risk 

notification of his prior offenses to his employer. The undersigned referred this matter to 

Magistrate Judge Robin M. Meriweather, who held a hearing on August 24, 2017. 

After consideration of the arguments and evidence presented by the parties and 

the Probation Office, Magistrate Judge Meriweather issued a Report and Recommendation [Dkt. 

43] on September 11, 2017. She recommends that the Court grant the request to modify Mr. 

Kelly’s supervised release conditions to include a thirty-day term of home detention, as a 

reasonable response to non-compliant behavior. Mr. Kelly does not oppose this 

recommendation. Magistrate Judge Meriweather further recommends that the Court deny the 

request to modify Mr. Kelly’s supervised release conditions to require third-party risk 

notification to his employer, as this requested condition is not reasonably necessary to protect the 

public. Counsel for both parties have represented to the Court that they do not object to these 
recommendations. Accordingly, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the 

Magistrate Judge and the parties’ decisions not to object thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED that the recommendations made by Magistrate Judge Meriweather in 

the Report and Recommendation are ADOPTED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Probation Office’s request to modify Mr. Kelly’s 

conditions of release to include a thirty-day term of home detention is GRANTED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Probation Office’s request to modify Mr. Kelly’s 

conditions of release to require that he provide third-party risk notification of his prior offenses 

to his employer is DENIED; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Kelly’s conditions of supervised release are 

modified to include a thirty-day term of home detention. 

SO ORDERED.

________/s/________________

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN

United States District Judge

DATE: September 29, 2017
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Southern Insect Management Research: Stoneville, MS
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Stoneville, Mississippi Southern Insect Management Research People







Mira  Gc Bhandari    Office Automation Assistant (Office Automation) /ARSUserFiles/59694/Mira Photo.png
 Contact Information USDA-ARSSouthern Insect Management Research Unit141 Experiment Station RoadP.O. Box 346Stoneville, MS 38776Ph: (662) 686-5231Fax: (662) 686-5421


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

WILLIAM G. MOORE, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

UNITED STATES _OF AMERICA, et 

al., 

Respondents. 

JELDERKS, Magistrate Judge. 

Case No. 15-cv-00484-JE 

ORDER 

This 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus case comes before the 

court on petitioner's Motion for Declaratory Judgment (#9), Motion 

for Judgment on the Pleadings (#14), and Motion for Reconsideration 

of Granting Time Extension (#15). Plaintiff believes that the 

Government has not timely responded to his Petition, and that 

although the Government has not yet been heard in this case, his 

factual allegations are so compelling that the Government cannot 

possibly prevail. The court denies these Motions. The Government 

has not missed its deadline for filing its responsive brief, which 

1 - ORDER 

Case 3:15-cv-00484-JE Document 17 Filed 06/04/15 Page 1 of 2
remains due on June 11, 2015. The court will evaluate this case in 

its entirety only after briefing is complete. Petitioner is 

advised that his filings should generally be limited to the 

briefing contemplated by the Scheduling Order. The court does note 

that he objects to any further extensions of time in this case. 

CONCLUSION 

Petitioner's Motion for Declaratory Judgment (#9), Motion for 

Judgment on the Pleadings (#14), and Motion for Reconsideration of 

Granting Time Extension (#15) are denied. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this 4fh day of June, 2015. 

United States Magistrate Judge 

2 - ORDER 

Case 3:15-cv-00484-JE Document 17 Filed 06/04/15 Page 2 of 2
#### MINCHIN, Appellant, v. GARDINER et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Third Department.

December 3, 1895.)

Action by Harry L. Minchin against Charles D. Gardiner and others.

No opinion. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with $10 costs.