alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1 

 

I, Robert F. Hussey, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Digital Lightwave, Inc. 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent function): 

 

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financialinformation; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

Date: March 30, 2005
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

SUSAN F. HARPER 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP, a 

foreign limited liability partnership 

Defendant. 

MOSMAN,J., 

PORTLAND DIVISION 

No. 3:16-cv-00111-YY 

OPINION AND ORDER 

On August 7, 2017, Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You issued her Findings and 

Recommendation ("F&R") [41], recommending that Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary 

Judgment [27] should be GRANTED. Plaintiff Harper objected [43] and Defendant Holland & 

Knight, LLP responded [44]. 

DISCUSSION 

The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may 

file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge, 

but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to 

make a de nova determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or 

recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(C). However, the court 

is not required to review, de nova or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of 

1 - OPINION AND ORDER 
the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See 

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 

(9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F &R 

depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject, 

or modify any part of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(C). 

Upon careful review, I agree with Judge You's recommendation and ADOPT the F&R 

[41] as my own opinion. Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [27] is GRANTED 

and Plaintiffs claims for common-law wrongful termination (3rd claim) and age-based hostile 

work environment (4th claim) are DISMISSED with prejudice. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this ·1;f;> day of September, 2017. 

MICHAEL W. MOS 

Chief United States Bi strict Judge 

2 - OPINION AND ORDER
BILLY J. WILLIAMS, OSB #901366 

United States Attorney 

District of Oregon 

ETHAN D. KNIGHT, OSB #992984 

GEOFFREY A. BARROW 

CRAIG J. GABRIEL, OSB #012571 

Assistant United States Attorneys 

ethan.knight@usdoj.gov

geoffrey.barrow@usdoj.gov 

craig.gabriel@usdoj.gov

1000 SW Third Ave., Suite 600 

Portland, OR 97204-2902 

Telephone: (503) 727-1000 

Attorneys for United States of America 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

 v. 

DAVID LEE FRY, 

 Defendant.

3:16-CR-00051-BR-13

GOVERNMENT’S RESPONSE TO 

DEFENDANT FRY’S MOTION 

TO COMPEL DISCOVERY (#493)

 The United States of America, by Billy J. Williams, United States Attorney for the 

District of Oregon, and through Ethan D. Knight, Geoffrey A. Barrow, and Craig J. Gabriel, 

Assistant United States Attorneys, hereby responds to defendant Fry’s Motion to Compel 

Discovery (ECF No. 493). 

 Defendant’s Motion should be denied as moot. The government will not seek to 

introduce defendant’s statements obtained from his February 11, 2016, interview with the 

Federal Bureau of Investigation against him at trial. The government will not introduce the 

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 569 Filed 05/16/16 Page 1 of 2
Government’s Response to Defendant Fry’s Motion to Compel Discovery (#493) Page 2

statements against defendant in its case-in-chief nor will it use the statements in a crossexamination of defendant should he choose to testify on his own behalf. 

 Dated this 16th day of April 2016. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 BILLY J. WILLIAMS 

 United States Attorney 

 s/ Ethan D. Knight 

 ETHAN D. KNIGHT, OSB #992984 

 GEOFFREY A. BARROW 

 CRAIG J. GABRIEL, OSB #012571 

 Assistant United States Attorneys 

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 569 Filed 05/16/16 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit
        32.2**
 **CERTIFICATION
        OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**
 **OF
        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  I,
        the
        undersigned James Roundtree, Chief Financial Officer of FIRSTPLUS Financial
        Group, Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
 
 1.  The
        Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended March
        31,
        2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Dated:
                  May 21, 2007
              /s/
                  James RoundtreeJames
                  RoundtreeChief
                  Financial OfficerPrincipal
                  Accounting Officer
1 – OPINION AND ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

PORTLAND DIVISION

CHARLES CRAIG REESE, 

Plaintiff, 

No. 3:14-cv-01394-SB

v. OPINION AND ORDER

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, 

Commissioner of Social Security Administration, 

 Defendant.

MOSMAN, J., 

On September 29, 2015, Magistrate Judge Beckerman issued her Findings and 

Recommendation (F&R) [19], recommending that the Commissioner’s final decision denying 

Plaintiff’s application for disability insurance benefits should be REVERSED AND 

REMANDED. No objections to the Findings and Recommendation were filed.

DISCUSSION

The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may 

file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge, 

but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to 

make a de novo determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or 

recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). However, the court 

is not required to review, de novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of 

the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See 

Case 3:14-cv-01394-SB Document 22 Filed 10/19/15 Page 1 of 2
2 – OPINION AND ORDER

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 

(9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F&R 

depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject, 

or modify any part of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). 

Upon review, I agree with Judge Beckerman’s recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R 

[19] as my own opinion. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 19th day of October, 2015. 

/s/ Michael W. Mosman ___ 

MICHAEL W. MOSMAN

United States District Judge

Case 3:14-cv-01394-SB Document 22 Filed 10/19/15 Page 2 of 2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 2, 2016

a0418

Order 

Clerk

May 2, 2016

151661(107)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 151661

COA: 318237

Jackson CC: 11-004710-FH

BRIAN DAVID KANE,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s February 2, 

2016 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
The Prudential Home Mortgage Company, Inc.
7470 New Technology Way
Frederick, Maryland  21701



As of and for the year ended December 31, 1995, Prudential Home
Mortgage Company, Inc. had complied in all material respects with
the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers
Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for
Mortgage Bankers with respect to its mortgage servicing operations.
As of and for the same period, Prudential HomeMortgage Company, Inc.,
had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy in the 
amount of $178 Million.


/s/MARVIN I. MOSKOWITZ
Marvin I. Moskowitz
Chief Executive Officer and Director


/s/JERRY HALBROOK
Jerry Halbrook
Executive Vice President, Controller & Treasurer
			

/s/BRIAN BARTLETT
Brian Bartlett
Vice President
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Nutrient Data Laboratory: Beltsville, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Beltsville, Maryland (BHNRC) Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center Nutrient Data Laboratory Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Collaborations The Nutrient Data Laboratory has a long and productive history of collaborative research involving stakeholders.  Current collaborators and projects:


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice
David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem
Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
April 21, 2020 

# Order

Clerk April 21, 2020

1 61195

H ILLMAN SIMM ONS,

S C: 161195 COA: 351927 Montcalm CC: 19

- 124910

- AH Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v

DEPARTMENT O F C ORRECTIONS and CARSON CIT Y CORRECTIONAL F ACILITY WARDEN, Defendant

- Appellee.

__ _____________________________________ /

O n order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be liable for filing fees. Appellant has provided an initial partial fee of $25.00. W ithin 21 days of the date of this order, appellant shall submit a copy of this order and refile the copy of the pleadings returned with this order

. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the dismissal of this application

. If a p pellant timely refiles the pleadings, monthly payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in the amount of 50 percent of the deposits made to appellant ’s account until the payments equal the balance due of $ 350 .00. This amoun t shall then be remitted to this Court. Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) appellant shall not file a new civil action or appeal in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to a ppellant and return a copy of appellant ’s pleadings with this order.
1

EVALUATION OF CRITERIA GUIDING 

TRANSITION OF SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT 

ACTIONS IN ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS 

BY 

GCDAMP SCIENCE ADVISORS 

JUNE 2010
# C_2009271EN.01000501.xml

| 12.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 271/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 271/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5573 — Remeha Group/Baxi Holdings)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 271/03

On 21 October 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5573. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5573. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# C_2009236EN.01000101.xml

| 1.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 236/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 236/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5613 — Piraeus Bank/BNP Paribas/Greek JV/Swiss JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 236/01

On 24 September 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5613. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5613. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Cropping Systems Research Laboratory: Lubbock, TX
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us






Field Dayheadline bar 2020 Field Day


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Crop Improvement and Genetics Research: Albany, CA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Albany, California Western Regional Research Center Crop Improvement and Genetics Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Research Programs and Projects at this LocationARS research is organized into National Programs. Within each National Program are research projects. Listed below are  the National Programs and research projects currently conducted at this location.
Clicking on a National Program (NP) will take you  to the main ARS site for more information on the program. Clicking on a research  project title will take you to more information on the project.  Current View: All Projects   Show All Projects ||
         Appropriated Projects Only


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Lake Powell Unregulated Inflow

Water year 2002

0

10,00020,00030,00040,00050,00060,000

Oct-01

Nov-01

Dec-01

Jan-02

Feb-02

Mar-02

Apr-02

May-02

Jun02

Cubic Feet Per Second2002 Observed Average Unregulated

Water Year 2002 Lake Po

Unregulated Inflow