alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                  The schedule contains summary financial  information extracted
                  from the Company's  consolidated  financial  statements and is
                  qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to such  financial
                  statements.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S Dollars
       
<S>                                                                <C>       
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          10,144,044
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,868,899
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (99,000)
<INVENTORY>                                        529,297
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,200,945
<PP&E>                                          83,329,315
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (16,502,447)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 101,223,583
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,247,266
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            62,866
<OTHER-SE>                                      60,104,858
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   101,233,583
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                93,155,831
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   91,875,422
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 819,245
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    461,164
<INCOME-TAX>                                       174,320
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                286,844
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       286,844
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .04
        


</TABLE>
# L_2009332EN.01007801.xml

| 17.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 332/78 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 332/78

---

DECISION OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION

of 2 December 2009

on the signature of Commission regulations, directives and decisions, when the latter do not specify to whom they are addressed

(C(2009) 9848)

THE PRESIDENT OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 297(2) thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Commission regulations, directives and decisions, when the latter do not specify to whom they are addressed, adopted by oral procedure pursuant to Article 8 of the Rules of Procedure of the Commission, shall be signed by the President by means of a summary note during the Commission meeting when they are adopted. This note shall be signed by the President or the Member of the Commission who deputises for him, following the order of precedence laid down by the President.

Commission regulations, directives and decisions, when the latter do not specify to whom they are addressed, adopted by written procedure pursuant to Article 12 of the Rules of Procedure, shall be listed in a day note. The day notes shall be mentioned in and attached to the summary note prepared for the Commission meeting in accordance with Article 17(1) of the Rules of Procedure, which is signed by the President during the meeting. However, the President delegates to the Secretary General the signature of those acts where urgency requires that they cannot await the next Commission meeting in order to be published and enter into force.

The signature of Commission regulations, directives and decisions, when the latter do not specify to whom they are addressed, adopted by empowerment procedure pursuant to Article 13 of the Rules of Procedure, is delegated to the Members of the Commission to whom powers of adoption are conferred.

The signature of Commission regulations, directives and decisions, when the latter do not specify to whom they are addressed, adopted by delegation or subdelegation procedure pursuant to Articles 13, 14, and 15 of the Rules of Procedure, is delegated to the delegated officials to whom powers of adoption are conferred.

Article 2

This Decision shall apply as of 1 December 2009.

Done at Brussels, 2 December 2009.

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---
# C_2009147EN.01000901.xml

| 27.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 147/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 147/9

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5484 — SGL Carbon/Brembo/BCBS/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 147/06

On 27 May 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5484. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5484. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 21-0344

IN RE THE MATTER OF THE

ESTATE OF JAMES A. KILEY, 

 DECEASED.

ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT

This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parties having failed to jointly 

and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c),

IT IS ORDERED THAT Dean D. Chisholm, whose name appears next on the list

of attorneys desiring appointment as mediators for Money Judgments appeals which is 

maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the 

mediation process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 

7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment.

A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to 

the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof.

DATED this August 4, 2021.

Bowen Greenwood, Clerk of the Supreme Court

c: Kristin L. Omvig, Alexander Amsler, Paul A. Sandry, Dean D. Chisholm

08/04/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0344
# **EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

I, Timothy S. Durham, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer ofObsidian Enterprises, Inc., certify that (i) Amendment No. 1 to theAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2005, (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of Obsidian Enterprises, Inc. as of the datesand for the periods set forth therein.

 

 
|   | /s/ Timothy S. Durham                 |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Timothy S. Durham                     |
|   | Chairman  and Chief Executive Officer |
|   | March  17, 2006                       |

 

I, Rick D. Snow, the Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer of Obsidian Enterprises, Inc., certify that (i) AmendmentNo. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31,2005, (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Obsidian Enterprises, Inc.as of the dates and for the periods set forth therein.

 

 
|   | /s/ Rick D. Snow                                  |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Rick D. Snow                                      |
|   | Executive  Vice President/Chief Financial Officer |
|   | March  17, 2006                                   |

 

----
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 6730** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. TYRONE DAVIS , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence
. R. Bryan Harwell , District Judge. ( 4:11

- cr - 02341

- RBH

- 1 ; 4:14

- cv - 00019

- RBH )

Submitted : September 1 6 , 2015 Decided: September 22, 2015

Before GREGORY , SHEDD , and WYNN, C ircuit Judges
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Tyrone Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant U nited S tates Attorney , Florence, South Carolina ; S tanley D. Ragsdale, Assistant United S tates Attorney , Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Tyrone Davis seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief o n the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Coc krell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a consti tutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Davis has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 99.2



Liquid Audio, Inc.

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



Pursuant to the
requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies as follows:



| | 1. |  | Stephen V. Imbler is the Chief Financial Officer of Liquid Audio, Inc. (the Company).
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | To the best of my knowledge:
| | -- |  | ----------------------------



| | A) |  | The Companys annual report on Form 10-K accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act); and
| | -- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | B) |  | The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated:  March 31, 2003



/s/    STEPHEN V.
IMBLERStephen V. Imbler President, Chief Financial Officer and Director




A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.1****Certification of Chief Executive Officer****Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002****(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode)**     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350 ofChapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), theundersigned officer of LCC International, Inc. (the“Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’sknowledge that:     (a) the Annual Report onForm 10-K for theyear ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”) ofthe Company fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and     (b) information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.     /s/ Dean J. Douglas           Dean J. Douglas *President and Chief Executive Officer*March 16, 2006
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 10.66



                                 March 12, 1999

Microcell Management, Inc.
14502 Greenview Drive, Suite 424
Laurel, MD  20708

Gentlemen:

       This letter is being entered into by LCC International, Inc., a Delaware
corporation ("LCC"), and Microcell Management, Inc., a Delaware corporation
("Microcell"), in connection with the Third Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement dated as of December 30, 1998 (the "Amended Credit Agreement"), among
LCC, Microcell, LCC Europe AS, LCC Design Services, L.L.C., LCC Development
Company, L.L.C., Koll Telecommunications Services, L.L.C., the lenders party
thereto (the "Lenders") and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Administrative Agent
(in such capacity, the "Administrative Agent").

       The purpose of this letter is to confirm LCC's agreement that, in
consideration of Microcell executing and delivering the Amended Credit Agreement
as a "Subsidiary Guarantor" (as defined therein), any amounts paid by Microcell
under the Amended Credit Agreement, whether to the Lenders, to the
Administrative Agent or otherwise, will be deemed to constitute payments to LCC
under the Revolving Credit Facility and Security Agreement dated December 31,
1996 between LCC and Microcell and the Revolving Credit Note dated December 31,
1996 of Microcell in favor of LCC issued thereunder (collectively, the
"Microcell Facility"), and will offset, on a dollar for dollar basis, amounts
then owed by Microcell to LCC under the Microcell Facility.


<PAGE>   2

                                                                       
March __, 1999
Page 2

       If you are in agreement with the foregoing, please sign and return one
copy of this letter.

                                              Very truly yours,

                                              LCC International, Inc.

                                              By  /S/ STUART B. LAWSON
                                                  --------------------
                                              Title: Vice President, Controller

ACCEPTED AND AGREED:

Microcell Management, Inc.

By:  /S/ PETER A. DELISO
     -------------------
Title:  Vice President, General Counsel

ACKNOWLEDGE AND APPROVED:

The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Administrative
Agent on behalf of the Lenders

By:  /S/ ALAN J. ARIA
     ----------------
Title:  Vice President
#### Nancy Mills, Appellant, v David Mills, Defendant. David Van Benschoten, Respondent.

[946 NYS2d 514]

Lahtinen, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Melkonian, J.), entered October 4, 2010 in Ulster County, which denied plaintiff’s motion to hold David Van Benschoten in civil contempt.

The underlying facts are set forth in our prior decision where we upheld the February 2009 order of Supreme Court (Lynch, J.) finding David Van Benschoten in civil contempt for violating the court’s February 2008 order by making payments on a building contract that went directly to defendant rather than through the temporary receiver *(Mills v Mills,*72 AD3d 1296 [2010]). In May 2010, plaintiff moved to have Van Benschoten again held in civil contempt. Supreme Court (Melkonian, J.) denied the application without a hearing. Plaintiff appeals, and we reverse.

The parties’ submissions raised a question of fact regarding whether Van Benschoten failed to pay the temporary receiver payments owed to defendant under Supreme Court’s February 2008 order from February 2009 until termination of the subject contract. As such, the matter is remitted for a hearing on the motion.

Peters, P.J., Rose, Malone Jr. and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs, and matter remitted to the Supreme Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court’s decision.
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement of Good Times Restaurants, Inc. on Form S-3 to our report, dated November 15, 2004, included in and incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Good Times Restaurants, Inc. for the year ended September 30, 2004.

 

 

 
***HEIN & ASSOCIATES LLP
Denver, Colorado

February 14, 2005***
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 10.32

                                    AMENDMENT

This document, dated January 16, 1998, amends the Employment Agreement, dated
October 5, 1995 between Xenometrix, Inc. and Ronald L. Hendrick.  Section 6(d)
of the Employment Agreement is hereby cancelled and replaced with the 
following Section 6(d):

      (d) If the Employee's employment shall be terminated by the Corporation
          pursuant to Section 5(d) or (f) hereof, then the corporation shall
          continue to pay the Employee his regular salary through the date which
          is six months after the Date of Termination; if the Employee's
          employment shall be terminated by the Corporation pursuant to Section
          5(e) hereof or as a result of a change of control of the corporation
          or of its Board of Directors, then the corporation shall continue to
          pay the Employee his regular salary through the date which is twelve
          months after the Date of Termination; provided, however, that in any
          case, the Corporation's obligation to pay such salary shall terminate
          at such time as the Employee commences any alternative full-time
          employment. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Corporation will be
          obligated to reimburse the Employee for reimbursable expenses (to the
          extent provided in Section 3(c) hereof) accrued through the Date of
          Termination. The Employee shall also be entitled to receive a payment
          for (i) any accrued but unused vacation days and (ii) a pro rata
          portion of any cash bonus due pursuant to Section 3(b) hereof. If the
          Employee's employment shall be terminated by the Corporation pursuant
          to Section 5(d), (e) or (f) hereof, and if the Employee shall be
          ineligible to participate in any of the Corporation's fringe benefit
          plans or arrangements as a result of his ceasing to be an employee of
          the Corporation, then the Corporation shall arrange to provide the
          Employee with substantially equivalent benefits as if he remained
          employed by the Corporation until the earlier of (i) six months, if
          terminated under Section 5(d) or (f), or twelve months, if terminated
          under Section 5(e) at no additional expense to the Employee.

XENOMETRIX, INC.                        RONALD L. HENDRICK


By:
       ----------------------------     --------------------------
Its:
       ----------------------------
Exhibit 32.1

DIVALL INSURED INCOME PROPERTIES 2

LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

Certification of Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Divall Insured Income Properties 2 Limited Partnership (the Company) certifies that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|                      |  |                                        |  |                                       
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|                      |  | THE PROVO GROUP, INC., General Partner
|                      |  |                                       
|Dated: March 28, 2007 |  | By                                     |  | /s/ Bruce A. Provo                    
|                      |  |                                        |  | President, Chief Executive Officer and
|                      |  |                                        |  | Chief Financial Officer               

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the
knowledge

standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
#### SMITH, Respondent, v. SMITH, et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

January 20, 1896.)

Action by Nathan C. Smith against Lyman J. Smith and E. L. Johnson.

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs and disbursements.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0372

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

WILLIAM JAMES PILLANS,

Defendant and Appellant

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including February 16, 2024, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 10 2024

01/10/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0372