alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2009280EN.01005601.xml

| 27.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 280/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 280/56

---

COMMISSION DECISION

of 26 October 2009

amending Decision 2008/359/EC setting up the High Level Group on the Competitiveness of the Agro-Food Industry, in order to extend its applicability

(2009/785/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Decision 2008/359/EC of 28 April 2008 setting up the High Level Group on the Competitiveness of the Agro-Food Industry (1) is applicable for a limited period of time. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Decision 2008/359/EC of 28 April 2008 setting up the High Level Group on the Competitiveness of the Agro-Food Industry (1) is applicable for a limited period of time.

| (2) | The High Level Group has contributed to the competitiveness of the Community agro-food industry by drawing up a Report on the Competitiveness of the European Agro-Food Industry (2), 30 recommendations and a Roadmap of Key Initiatives containing implementing actions. These initiatives need to be followed up. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The High Level Group has contributed to the competitiveness of the Community agro-food industry by drawing up a Report on the Competitiveness of the European Agro-Food Industry (2), 30 recommendations and a Roadmap of Key Initiatives containing implementing actions. These initiatives need to be followed up.

| (3) | The work of the High Level Group on the Competitiveness of the Agro-Food Industry should continue under the same rules as established by that Decision. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The work of the High Level Group on the Competitiveness of the Agro-Food Industry should continue under the same rules as established by that Decision.

| (4) | Decision 2008/359/EC should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Decision 2008/359/EC should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

Article 6 of Decision 2008/359/EC is replaced by the following:

‘Article 6

Expiry

This Decision shall apply until 31 December 2010.’

Done at Brussels, 26 October 2009.

For the Commission

Günter VERHEUGEN

Vice-President

---

(1)  
  OJ L 120, 7.5.2008, p. 15.

1

(2)  http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/food/files/high_level_group_2008/documents_hlg/final_report_hlg_17_03_09_en.pdf

2

---
VINCENT R. D'ANTONI, FORMER HUSBAND

, Appellant,

v.

NANCY N. D'ANTONI N/K/A NANCY A. NOONEY, FORMER WIFE
, Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 2922

_____________________________/

Opinion filed February 3, 2016

. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Linda F. McCallum , Judge

.
Gerald S. Bettman, Jacksonville , for Appellant.

Robert W. Elrod of Elrod & Elrod, Jacksonville , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF

, OSTERHAUS

, and KELSEY

, J J

. , CONCUR.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                           50008
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1488527
<ALLOWANCES>                                     52188
<INVENTORY>                                     791758
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 75717
<PP&E>                                         3685219
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2076765
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4306496
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2755258
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     399044
<COMMON>                                          1382
<OTHER-SE>                                    (193370)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4306496
<SALES>                                        8153689
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               8153689
<CGS>                                          6993068
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  6993068
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1423605
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              239310
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (502294)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (502294)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (425601)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (927895)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.50)
        

</TABLE>
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 22

- 40053

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**Darrell Lenard Bates,**

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:20

- CR

- 58

- 1

Before **Smith , Oldham,**  and **Wilson,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *
Darrell Lenard Bates filed an interlocutory appeal from the magistrate judge’s denial of his pro se motion to quash an indictment charging him with failing to register as a sex offender. Counsel moved to withdraw, and Bates moved for the appointment of su bstitute counsel.

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 13, 2022
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-40053 Document: 00516354798 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/13/2022No. 22

- 40053

2 It is the duty of this court to raise jurisdictional issues sua sponte, if

necessary. Mosley v. Cozby , 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). As an initial matter, Bates’s pro se motion to quash was denied as moot by the magistrate judge. In expanding the duties of magistrate judges under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), “Congress made clear that

. . . the magistrate [judge] acts subsidiary to and only in aid of the district court. Thereafter, the entire process takes place
under the district court’s total control and jurisdiction.” United States v.
Raddatz , 447 U.S. 667, 681 (1980). Thus, we neither monitor nor supervise the work of magistrate judges to whom cases are referred under § 636(b). If Bates is dissatisfied with the magi strate judge’s ruling on his motion to quash the indictment, he should direct his complaints to the district court judge, in this case, Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle.
Additionally, the denial of a motion to quash an indictment prior to entry of final judgment is typically not an order over which a court of appeals would have jurisdiction; as a general rule, we lack jurisdiction over an interlocutory motion such as this

. See Abney v. United States , 431 U.S. 651, 663 (1977); United States v. Miller , 952 F.2d 86 6, 874 (5th Cir. 1992). The appeal is therefore dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

**APPEAL DISMISSED** ; m otions to withdraw and to appoint
substitute counsel **DENIED** as moot. Case: 22-40053 Document: 00516354798 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/13/2022
RULE 7.1 Page 1 of 1

Carl D. Crowell, OSB No. 982049

email: carl@crowell-law.com

CROWELL LAW

P.O. Box 923

Salem, OR 97308

(503) 581-1240

Of attorneys for plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON

VOLTAGE PICTURES, LLC, a California 

Limited Liability Company, and

DALLAS BUYERS CLUB, LLC, a Texas 

Limited Liability Company,

Plaintiffs,

v.

DOE-50.141.97.4,

Defendant.

 Case No.: 3:14-cv-1872 

PLAINTIFFS’ RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE

PLAINTIFFS’ RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, plaintiffs state they do not have a parent 

corporation and no publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of their stock.

DATED: November 22, 2014.

/s/ Carl D. Crowell

Carl D. Crowell, OSB No. 982049

email: carl@crowell-law.com

(503) 581-1240

Of attorneys for plaintiffs

Case 3:14-cv-01872-AC Document 2 Filed 11/22/14 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 23.02**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-53726, 333-02948, 333-57965, 333-37168, 333-106062, and333-106064 on Form S-8, 333-65555, 333-66943, and 333-122084 on Form S-3, and 333-31618 on Form S-4, of our report dated March 15, 2007 relating to the financial statements of Premier Boxboard Limited, LLC (which report expresses an unqualifiedopinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption by Premier Boxboard Limited LLC of the recognition and related disclosure provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, Employers’ Accounting forDefined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, on December 31, 2006), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Caraustar Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

 

Atlanta, Georgia 

March 16, 2007
Exhibit 32b

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Murray United Development Corp.
on Form 10-KSB for the period ending July 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Anthony Campo, Chairman of the
Board and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date:  October 29, 2003                       / s / Anthony Campo

                                              ANTHONY CAMPO,
                                              Chairman of the Board and
                                              Chief Financial and Accounting
                                              Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

# AGENCY:

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

HHS gives notice of a determination concerning a petition to add a class of employees from Superior Steel Company, in Carnegie, Pennsylvania, to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 (EEOICPA).

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Grady Calhoun, Director, Division of Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 1090 Tusculum Avenue, MS C-45, Cincinnati, OH 45226-1938, Telephone 1-877-222-7570. Information requests can also be submitted by email to                         *DCAS@CDC.GOV.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On August 19, 2021, the Secretary of HHS determined that the following class of employees does not meet the statutory criteria for addition to the SEC as authorized under EEOICPA:

“All atomic weapons employees who worked in any area at Superior Steel Co. in Carnegie, Pennsylvania, during the period from January 1, 1952, through December 31, 1957.”

(Authority: 42 U.S.C.7384q.)

Frank J. Hearl,

Chief of Staff, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

[FR Doc. 2021-19166 Filed 9-3-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 172 

AN ACT 

To designate the United States courthouse located at 501 

East Court Street in Jackson, Mississippi, as the ‘‘R. 

Jess Brown United States Courthouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 172 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The United States courthouse located at 501 East 

3 Court Street in Jackson, Mississippi, shall be known and 

4 designated as the ‘‘R. Jess Brown United States Court5 house’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the United 

9 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed 

10 to be a reference to the ‘‘R. Jess Brown United States 

11 Courthouse’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 28, 2015. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 172 

AN ACT 

To designate the United States courthouse located 

house’’. as the ‘‘R. Jess Brown United States Courtat 501 East Court Street in Jackson, Mississippi,
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         134,162
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  726,248
<ALLOWANCES>                                   152,419
<INVENTORY>                                    123,056
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,126,423
<PP&E>                                         541,116
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,661,509
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          848,657
<BONDS>                                        926,524
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           192
<OTHER-SE>                                     852,869
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,661,509
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,028,533
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,912,764
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,330
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 93,439
<INCOME-TAX>                                    46,994
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             46,445
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (75,434)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (28,989)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.15)
        

</TABLE>
WILLIAM TAMAYO, Regional Attorney 

John F. Stanley, Supervisory Trial Attorney 

Damien A. Lee, Senior Trial Attorney 

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity 

Commission 

Seattle Field Office 

909 First A venue, Suite 400 

Seattle, Washington 98104-1061 

Damien.Lee@eeoc.gov 

Tel: (206) 220-6915 

Attorneys for Plaintiff EEOC 

HONORABLE MICHAEL J. MCSHANE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT 

OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

RUBY TUESDAY, INC., 

Defendant. 

EUGENE DIVISION 

CIVIL ACTION NO.6: 15-cv-1 09-MC 

ORDER RE CONSENT 

DECREE 

The Court, having considered the Consent Decree that the parties filed herewith, 

HEREBY ORDERS THAT the Consent Decree be, and the same hereby is, approved as the final 

lPROPOSED) ORDER re CONSENT DECREE 

(6:15-CV-109-MC) Page 1 of 3 

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT 

OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 

909 First A\·enue, Suite400 

Seattle, \Vnshington 98104--1061 

Telephone: (206) 220-6883 

Facsimile: (206) 220-691 t 

TDD: (206) 220-6882 

Case 6:15-cv-00109-MC Document 19 Filed 05/19/15 Page 1 of 2
decree of this Court in full settlement of this action. This lawsuit is hereby dismissed with 

prejudice and without costs or attorneys' fees. The Court retains jurisdiction of this matter for 

purposes of enforcing the Consent Decree approved herein. 

DATED this Jj_ day of May 2015 

l 

United States District Judge 

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 

WILLIAM TAMAYO 

Regional Attorney 

JOHN F. STANLEY 

Supervisory Trial Attorney 

' DAMIEN A. LEE 

Senior Trial Attorney 

BY: s/ Damien A. Lee 

Seattle Field Office 

909 First A venue, Suite 400 

Seattle, Washington 98104 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

[PROPOSED! ORDER re CONSENT DECREE 

(6:15-CV-109-MC) Page 2 of 3 

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT 

OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 

909 First Avenue, Suite 400 

Seattle, Washington 98104-1061 

Telephone: (206) 220-6883 

Facsinule: (206) 221)-6911 

TIJD: (206) 220-6882 

Case 6:15-cv-00109-MC Document 19 Filed 05/19/15 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 23.01**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-77682, 33-53726, 333-02948, 333-57965, 333-37168, 333-106062,and 333-106064 on Form S-8, 333-65555 and 333-122084 on Form S-3, and 333-31618 on Form S-4, of our reports dated March 14, 2005 relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Caraustar Industries, Inc. andsubsidiaries, and management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Caraustar Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2004.

 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

 

Atlanta, Georgia 

March 14, 2005
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Case 3:15-cv-01953-MO Document 1-3 Filed 10/16/15 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 3:15-cv-01953-MO Document 1-3 Filed 10/16/15 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                       5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0001000686
<NAME>                          North American Resorts, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                1
<CURRENCY>                                         US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                    JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                      SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                             1
<CASH>                                                      0
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            0
<PP&E>                                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           1133
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       0
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                           1471583
<COMMON>                                               103294
<OTHER-SE>                                           (1573744)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             1133
<SALES>                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            0
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            1699
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         (1699)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         0
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                            (1699)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                 0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               0



</TABLE>