alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006132EN.01003901.xml

| 7.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 132/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 132/39

---

Publication of existing State aid measures in the new Member States in the sector of transport

(2006/C 132/10)

(Text with EEA relevance)

In accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 4, Chapter 3 of Annex IV to the Treaty of Accession the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic communicated to the Commission State aid measures which may be regarded as existing aid within the meaning of Article 88(1) of the EC Treaty until the end of the third year after the date of accession. The Republic of Lithuania did not inform the Commission of any such measures.

The list of these State aid measures, as notified to the Commission by these Member States, are/is hereby published in the official language of the submitting country.

This list, translated in a working language of the European Commission (English, German or French) will be placed on the following Internet website of the European Commission:

http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/energy_transport/state_aid/index_en.htm.

This publication shall in no circumstances be regarded as an official position of the Commission regarding these measures, in particular as to whether these measures fulfil all the conditions as laid down by the Treaty of Accession or whether they are deemed compatible with the Treaty.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND BALANCE SHEET AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q COMMUNICATIONS & POWER INDUSTRIES
HOLDING CORPORATION FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JULY 3, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001000564
<NAME> COMMUNICATION & POWER INDUSTRIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-02-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-03-1998
<CASH>                                           2,283
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,850
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     55,871
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               112,790
<PP&E>                                          78,074
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 235,071
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           71,645
<BONDS>                                        127,706
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           19,866
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,961
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   235,071
<SALES>                                        190,625
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               190,625
<CGS>                                          142,181
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  142,181
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,406
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,520
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,600
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,725
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,875
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,875
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Agricultural Genetic Resources Preservation Research: Fort Collins, CO
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Fort Collins, Colorado Center for Agricultural Resources Research Agricultural Genetic Resources Preservation Research Docs Microbes







Deposit Microbesheadline bar **Deposit of Security Duplicate Collections (Black Box-Microbes)** For information contact NLGRP-Blackbox@usda.gov Microbe Black Box Deposit Instructions Microbe Deposit Form Letter of Transmittal Microbe Storage Information Form Black Box Storage Deposit (Material Transfer) Agreement **Deposit of Differential Hosts Sets and Reference Isolates (CPPSI-Collaboration of Plant Pathogen Strain Identification)** For information contact NLGRP-Datamanage-Helpdesk@usda.gov CPPSI Deposit Instructions CPPSI Reference Isolate Storage Information Form CPPSI Seed Storage Information Form


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
The Honorable Tom Hanna 

Criminal District Attorney 

P. 0. Box 2553 

Beaumont, Texalr 77704 

Dear Mr. Hanna: 

opinion No. Ii-834 

Ret Citation fees in 

small claims court. 

You suggest there is a conflict between article 2460a, 

V.T.C.S., and article 3933a, V.T.C.S., and you ask what 

citation fee should be charged by the small claims court. 

Section 5a of article 2460a was last amended in 1963, 

and provides: 

Sec. Sa. A fee of Two Dollars ($2) 

shall be charged for the service of 

citation provided for in Section 5 and 

shall be accountable ae a fee of office 

by the officer serving citation. 

Article 3933a was last amended in 1975, and provides 

in part: 

Sheriffs and Constables shall receive the 

following fees: 

For each person, corporation or legal 

entity, on whom service of citation, 

subpoena, summons, or process not otherwise provided for, is performed 

return made, including-mileage, 

a fee of 

and 

if any, 

(a) Small Claims Courts $4.00 

(b) All other Courts $8.00 

p. 3520 
The Honorable Tom Hanna - page 2 (H-834) 

These two statutes are in irreconcilable conflict, since 

one provides for a two dollar fee and the other provides for 

a four dollar fee. When twO acts irreconcilably conflict 

the latter enactment is held to repeal the inconsistent 

portions of the former. Crepe 2 Board of Firemen’s Relief 

and Retirement Fund Trustees of Ammo7456 S.W.Zd 434 

75x. ci A --Amarillo ln0, writ ref'd n.r.e.1; Balsell 

5 TexasVWat~~*Commission, 380 S.W.Zd 1 (Tex. Civ. App. -- 

Austin961.lt ref'd n.r.e.1. Accordingly, the provisions 

of article j933a prevail, and a citation fee-&f fou; dollars 

may be charged in small claims courts. 

SUMUARY 

The fee for citation in small claims 

court is four dollars. 

yery truly yours, 

Attorney General of Texas 

APPROVED: 

Opinion Committee 

jwb 

p. 3521
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 19-0547

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

BEAU HERMAN MILLER,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable John A. Kutzman, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 3 2021

11/03/2021

Case Number: DA 19-0547
Document

Consent to Temporary Reduction of Biweekly Installments of Base Salary
Reference is hereby made to that certain Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the undersigned (“Executive”) and PBF Investments LLC (“Company”) dated as of December 17, 2012 (the “Employment Agreement”).  Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Employment Agreement.
WHEREAS, due to the Company’s financial circumstances arising from current market and other conditions that are adversely impacting the business (collectively, “Market Conditions”), the Company and its affiliates are undertaking a number of short-term initiatives to temporarily reduce operating expenses and desire to implement reductions in the salaries of its executives and other highly compensated employees;
WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of the Employment Agreement, a failure to pay or cause to be paid Executive’s Base Salary when due constitutes “Good Reason” under clause (A) of that term as defined in the Employment Agreement unless the Executive’s consent is obtained; and
WHEREAS, Executive is willing to consent to a temporary reduction in Executive’s Base Salary solely as part of the response to the Market Conditions and not for any other purposes under the Employment Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED that, effective as of April 1, 2020 (the “Effective Date”), in connection with the Market Conditions, Executive hereby consents to a temporary 67% reduction in the biweekly installments of Executive’s Base Salary to be paid by the Company from the Effective Date; provided that such reduction in the biweekly installments shall not reduce Executive’s current annual Base Salary of $1,500,000 for any purpose under the Employment Agreement.
																		
	ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:					
						
	EXECUTIVE					
						
	/s/ Thomas Nimbley				3/26/2020	
	Name:	Thomas Nimbley			Date	
	Title:	Chief Executive Officer				
						
	COMPANY					
						
	/s/ Trecia Canty				3/26/2020	
	Name:	Trecia Canty			Date	
	Title:	Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS FOR THE



### F IRST 

### D ISTRICT OF 

### T EXAS AT 

### H OUSTON



### O RDER ON 

### M OTION



### November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 1 5

- 0 0 195

- C V

Style: N.G. v. Department of family and Protective Services

Date motion filed * : March 10

, 2015

Type of motion: Motion for extension of time to file clerk’s record

Party filing motion: District clerk

Document to be filed: Clerk’s record

Is appeal accelerated? Yes

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: March 9, 2015

Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date

Date Requested: March 20, 2015

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: March 20 , 201 5

 T he Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

.

 Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot )

 Other: _____________________________________

Because this is a termination case, the Court is required to bring this appeal to final disposition within 180

days of the date the notice of appeal was filed so far as reasonably possible. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2,

reprinted in T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN

. , tit. 2, subtit. F app. (West 2013). Accordingly, no further extensions

will be granted.

Judge ’ s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd



Panel consists of

____________________________________________

Date: March 12, 2015
.

# .d

.

Tho 8aia Rouse Bill x0. 

### .46 

# 3.8 lalom ss t.bsToma Rice Developwmt &en and in brisk it. provfUeo for the leqy and oolleotlon.or.atax ana the expenaiture..thereof in the prcuaotlon

or, snles and advort~sb~ or Tears rioo ana rioo pXVhIOt6 #U&d

rOr rS802mh in'

EIib t%?WiOpEiOnt ,Of

nOW U808 ror rlao ana rioe produoto. The AOt lwc%viaes tar a rlae developQOILt OcDnaiSsiOn

OOQOtU3aOr ri'oe

prOOXIi3,

t0 be QpPOintOdby #a Cond8sbncr..or Boara of AgFioultura with t&o advioo arrd oonsoat or tha licnate. &I Saotion 6 OS the Aot it ie proviae4 that the tax 8hell be remitteaalraot to tho woe De- . _. VelOpIWlt 0CEXd58iOn. hur 4LLOl'Bp t0 ~Ul'firot QuBStioII, therefore :D that the Toxe8 Rloe DovuWpmont Owamlnn%oa %a authord to raaoloe 

### l’nntln8OarUlnS under the 

### provla~o~ or the Aot. Xt is uotob howeyor that Seotlon ll 02 the Act exprossly praviat3i that such Texas Rloe Developmnt comlo8io~ ohall not oonotitute a separateor nor Stete agenoy but Is * a. part 61'

tho Ds$nrtnant02 A&aulture. Ae noted abova, the aolleotl& eve to be made .by tho.COmlsoionor or Agrlaulture thrOu& tho Rio0 DevelOpmmt Board. The Aot itee1.i ooat8lM no 0X9W88 prov%aloM as to the-mathoao? hea4lintj the Monet after it hm 'beanoollootea. Ih Seotfon lo ft is provitled that: wl rUa8 ooneotod hareunder or horebyapproprfated to the Texan Rloo Developmmat coFsDinol.on

for the purpose of oerr$ln~out the provlSiOll5 Of thi8 Aat.” **But tile**  **us0 or**  **SUOh lantpage**  **a8 that**  **l.a** lGekiag em appropriation

bee never been teIcen%omoen 

## that the **austodg-** of the fund8 80 

## Bppr0pmti8a le. tadreby ohnagea rrm the State~Txvaeurer to the Department'towhioh the epp+prlatfOR 18 leadO+ The.~~noysa8n be depositadwith the Btste Troaaurerana ~614 out'uponw&manta drawn by the ccmptroller snd yet the **appropriation be**  given **?rta Tull**  **meeting. Kor**  **ara there**  aqnather provlslanein the Aot whiola two neoeBSkW11y. inaon8istent

with the bati* Of thO50 fUId8 in the 

### SQUOmumor thot othor noneye aOlleotoa**by** the Stats aro he&lea in the abnenoe ot opooial

### prooi8ion8.Ye wm.54nota in portfoulerthht this Aot oontafneno prov~oionfor the bonding ai the Texas Rise lkvolopwmt Coml8sIOa, 

### or any ap-' pointeo theroof, 58 thd pornanantOUStOdllD or theSO' runas. Our amwar to your boooad, third and tOUZ%h QUMtlOM, thereroro, io (IA

arrimativo one.
.

-.

.

. . -_. ..

Dapcrrbwnt*r Agloultrire -Page 

### 3

. ." ~

Al-t. 

### i+335,

It is not eboolutel$

### naoosasry under tha etatuta, R8Vi883dcivil %tetUtOS, iOr the head OS the dep5rtmant to 5Im ololrs ana ecoounta. It is nooessary that the 5GU8 ba aQned by tho.headOr the dopartiaont Or 

### other parsonroagonalbleror Incuxdng the ixpendlture. On this point t&e roquilwnentOS th8 COnptrolbr 8hOultl be 08aer.. **talnad** and oaxiplle6 with.

AmRovm OCT 

### 30;194l (sigiea) Groves 3eZlers IOUr8 very truly ATTORNEY tyNERAL OP TEZAS



## oBY 8. H. 8. .oxAIma' . 

### ‘.
**Exhibit 23.01**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration StatementNo. 33-53726, 333-02948, 333-57965, 333-37168, 333-106062, and 333-106064 on Form S-8, 333-65555, 333-66943, and 333-122084 on Form S-3, and 333-31618 on Form S-4, of our report dated March 14, 2008, relating to the financial statementsand financial statement schedule of Caraustar Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”), (which report on the consolidated financial statements expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph related to theadoption the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), *Share-Based Payment*, on January 1, 2006 and the recognition and related disclosure provision of Statement of Financial Accounting StandardsNo. 158, *Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plan*s, on December 31, 2006 and the adoption on January 1, 2007 of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48,*Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes*) and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year endedDecember 31, 2007. 

***DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP***

**Atlanta, Georgia**

**March 14, 2008**
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT

TO RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE EXCHANGE
ACT

I Alok Bajpai certify that:

|1. |  | I have reviewed this
      report on Form 10-K of Intelligroup, Inc.;                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | Based on my knowledge,
      this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
      omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
      misleading with respect to the period covered by this
  report;

|DATE: April 30, 2010 | By: /s/ | ALOK
  BAJPAI                                                 
|-------------------- | ------- | --------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |         | Alok Bajpai                                                   
|                     |         | Chief Financial Officer and Principal
      Accounting Officer

---
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Norma Angelo, as Widow of John Angelo, Deceased, Respondent, v Occidental Chemical, Respondent, and Special Fund for Reopened Cases, Appel*1555lant. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

[946 NYS2d 261]—

Malone Jr., J.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed March 14, 2011, which, among other things, ruled that claimant was entitled to receive death benefits at the maximum rate as a surviving spouse under Workers’ Compensation Law § 16 (5).

As relevant herein, the previously-established underlying workers’ compensation claim of John Angelo (hereinafter decedent) for the occupational disease of pleural asbestosis was given a disablement date of May 27, 1994. On October 12, 2007, decedent died due to what was later determined to be asbestos-related pleural disease. Claimant, decedent’s widow, filed this claim for death benefits. A Workers’ Compensation Law Judge (hereinafter WCLJ) discharged the employer’s workers’ compensation carrier and shifted liability to the Special Fund for Reopened Cases. The WCLJ thereafter established the case for causally-related death, established an average weekly wage of $838.46 “per payroll in the underlying [occupational disease] case” and awarded benefits at the statutory maximum rate of $500 per week. The Workers’ Compensation Board upheld the WCLJ’s decision and this appeal by the Special Fund ensued.

According to the Special Fund, the Board erred in ruling that claimant was entitled to the maximum benefit rate in effect on the date of decedent’s death and, instead, should have applied the lower statutory maximum rate applicable on the date of disablement in the underlying occupational disease claim, i.e., May 27, 1994. We disagree. Significantly, the increased maximum death benefit rate set forth as part of the comprehensive revisions to the Workers’ Compensation Law in 2007 states that it applies, as pertinent here, “where the death occurs on or after [July 1, 2007]” (Workers’ Compensation Law § 16 [5] [1]). The Board correctly found that the unambiguous language of this statutory provision encompasses all qualifying deaths occurring in the applicable time frame, regardless of the date of disablement *(see Employer: McLane Northeast,*2008 WL 5550077, 2008 NY Wrk Comp LEXIS 11560 [WCB No. 6070 7321, Dec. 28, 2008]). Contrary to the Special Fund’s argument, our decision in *Matter of House v International Talc Co.*(261 AD2d 687, 689 [1999]) does not compel a different result.

The remaining arguments advanced by the Special Fund have been examined and found to be unpersuasive.

Rose, J.E, Stein, Garry and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
CHIEF JUSTICE

ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ DORI CONTRERAS GARZA GINA M. BENAVIDES GREGORY T. PERKES NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK CECILE FOY GSANGER NUECES COUNTY COURTH OUSE 901 LEOPARD, 10TH FL OOR CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401 361

- 888

- 0416 (TEL) 361

- 888

- 0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BLDG. 100 E. CANO, 5TH FLO OR EDINBURG, TEXAS 7853 9 956

- 318

- 2405 (TEL) 956

- 318

- 2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa 

# Court of Appeals

Thirteenth District of Texas

June 2 9 , 2015

Hon. Gilbert Lozano District Clerk 546 W. Hidalgo Ave. Raymondville, TX 78580 * DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13

- 13

- 00257

- CV Tr.Ct.No. 2009

- CV

- 0010

- A Style: VIVIANA SOSA, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE

ESTATE OF DES TINY SOSA, A DECEASED CHILD, AND JESSE SOSA v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY AND ERNESTO ORTEGON

The judgment of the trial court in the above cause was REVERSED AND REMANDE D by this Court on the 5/14/2015. The mandate is enclosed.

Cost s of the appeal were adjudged against appellee s , UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY AND ERNESTO ORTEGON.

Pursuant to Section 51.204(b) of the Government Code, the attorneys of record are hereby notified that any exhibits submitted to the Court by a party may be withdrawn by that party or the party’s attorney of record within 30 days. Exhibits on file with the Court will be destroyed three (3) years after final disposition of the case or at an earlier date if ordered by the Court.



### Very truly yours,

Cecile F oy Gsanger, Clerk

CFG:ch Enc.

cc: Hon. J. Lynn Watson (DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL) Hon. Marc G. Rosenthal (DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL) Hon. Norton A. Colvin Jr. (DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL) Hon. David I. Schoen (DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL) Hon. Mitchell Craig Chaney (DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL) Hon. Kent Geoffrey Rutter (DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL)