alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1898

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building located at 1301 Clay

Street in Oakland, California, as the ‘‘Ronald V. Dellums

Federal Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1898 ES

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF RONALD V. DELLUMS FED2 ERAL BUILDING.

3 The Federal building located at 1301 Clay Street in

4 Oakland, California, shall be known and designated as the

5 ‘‘Ronald V. Dellums Federal Building’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

9 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

10 a reference to the ‘‘Ronald V. Dellums Federal Building’’.

Passed the Senate June 2, 1998.

Attest:

Secretary.
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1898

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building located at 1301

ald V. Dellums Federal Building’’.Clay Street in Oakland, California, as the ‘‘Ron-
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco RUIZ-SILVA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-50411.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 16, 2007 *.

Filed April 19, 2007.

Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Francisco Ruiz-Silva, Fort Dix, NJ, pro se.

Siri Shetty, Esq., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Francisco Ruiz-Silva appeals from the 75-month sentence imposed following his conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we remand this case for further proceedings consistent with *United States v. Ameline,*409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc).

Appellant contends that he should receive resentencing because he was sentenced at a time when the United States Sentencing Guidelines were mandatory, in violation of *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Because the district court vacated and reentered judgment, his conviction is “not yet final” on direct review, and so he is entitled to the benefit of the *Booker*decision. *See Griffith v. Kentucky,*479 U.S. 314, 323, 107 S.Ct. 708, 93 L.Ed.2d 649 (1987); *see also United States v. LaFromboise,*427 F.3d 680, 683 (9th Cir.2005) (noting that a conviction is not final without an amended judgment of conviction). Accordingly, we remand this case to the district court for the limited purpose of determining whether, if it had known that the Guidelines were advisory, it would have imposed a materially difference sentence than the one it did impose. *See Ameline,*409 F.3d at 1084-85.

We reject appellant’s remaining contentions. *See United States v. Zepeda-Martinez,*470 F.3d 909, 912 (9th Cir.2006); *United States v. Weiland,*420 F.3d 1062, 1079 n. 16 (9th Cir.2005).

REMANDED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 32.0

# ANTARES PHARMA, INC. CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

Each
of the undersigned, Jack E. Stover and Lawrence M. Christian, the Chief Executive Officer
and the Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Antares Pharma, Inc. (the
Company), individually and not jointly has executed this Certification in
connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the
Report).

Each
of the undersigned hereby certifies that:

1.     
               The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
               of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     
               The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations                 
      
                of the Company.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this Certification as of the 24th
day of August, 2005.

| | /s/ Jack E. Stover

Jack E. Stover
President and Chief Executive Officer
/s/ Lawrence M. Christian
Lawrence M. Christian
Vice President - Finance, 
 Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 31.2 

 

I, Robert F. Hussey, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Digital Lightwave, Inc. 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent function): 

 

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financialinformation; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

Date: March 30, 2005
PAGE 1 – NOTICE OF DISMISSAL Joel Christiansen

VOGELE & CHRISTIANSEN

812 NW 17th Avenue, Portland, OR 97209

T: (503) 841-6722 / F: (503) 928-5580

joel@oremploymentlawyer.com

Joel Christiansen, OSB No. 080561

joel@oremploymentlawyer.com

VOGELE & CHRISTIANSEN

812 NW 17th Avenue

Portland, OR 97209

(503) 841-6722

Of Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON

PORTLAND DIVISION

STEPHEN HILGART, 

Plaintiff,

v.

VOIPWALKER, INC., a Delaware 

corporation doing business as 

VOICEWALKER; VOICEWALKER, 

INC., an Illinois corporation; TIMOTHY

SLEDZ, an individual,

Defendants.

Case No. 3:16-CV-00079-SB

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL

Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff

Stephen Hilgart, through counsel, hereby gives notice that the above captioned action is 

voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against all defendants.

Dated: June 9, 2016 VOGELE & CHRISTIANSEN

/s/ Joel Christiansen

Joel Christiansen, OSB No. 080561

joel@oremploymentlawyer.com

Of Attorneys for Plaintiff

Case 3:16-cv-00079-SB Document 5 Filed 06/09/16 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7849
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WENDELL SERGEANT, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge. (CR-92-329, CA-97-419-2) Submitted: March 26, 1998 Decided: April 7, 1998 Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Cheryl Johns Sturm, Westtown, Pennsylvania, for Appellant. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Sergeant , Nos. CR-92-329, CA-97-419-2 (S.D.W. Va. Oct. 29, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 168 (Thursday, September 2, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 49314]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-18978]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XB375]


Fisheries of the South Atlantic; South Atlantic Fishery 
Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The South Atlantic Fishery Management Council (Council) will 
host a workgroup meeting via webinar to develop an ecosystem model to 
describe the ecological effects of increased Red Snapper recruitment.

DATES: The webinar meeting will be held September 21-23, 2021, from 
12:30 p.m. until 5 p.m. each day.

ADDRESSES: 
    Meeting address: The meeting will be held via webinar. The webinar 
is open to members of the public. Information, including a link to 
webinar registration will be posted on the Council's website at: 
https://safmc.net/safmc-meetings/other-meetings/ as it becomes 
available.
    Council address: South Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 4055 
Faber Place Drive, Suite 201, N Charleston, SC 29405.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kim Iverson, Public Information 
Officer, SAFMC; phone: (843) 302-8439 or toll free: (866) SAFMC-10; 
fax: (843) 769-4520; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#244f4d490a4d524156574b4a6457454249470a4a4150"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="94fffdf9bafde2f1e6e7fbfad4e7f5f2f9f7bafaf1e0">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Council will host a workgroup meeting to 
develop an ecosystem model to describe the ecological effects of 
increased Red Snapper recruitment. An ecosystem model has been 
developed for the South Atlantic region and the model is being 
parameterized to describe the potential ecological impact of changing 
Red Snapper recruitment. Modelers will present their ecosystem model to 
the workgroup to gather feedback and describe assumptions. Participants 
include ecosystem modelers, stock assessment scientists, biologists, 
and researchers. The product from the workgroup meeting will be a 
report to the Council.

Special Accommodations

    These meetings are physically accessible to people with 
disabilities. Requests for auxiliary aids should be directed to the 
Council office (see ADDRESSES) 5 days prior to the meeting.

    Note: The times and sequence specified in this agenda are 
subject to change.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: August 30, 2021.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-18978 Filed 9-1-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
DISMISS and Opinion Filed April 9, 2019 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00342-CV 

RICHARD J. MALOUF, Appellant 

V. 

SHAMOUN & NORMAN, LLP, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-07224 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Molberg, and Justice Nowell

Opinion by Chief Justice Burns 

Before the Court is appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal. We grant the motion and 

dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). 

190342F.P05 

 

/Robert D. Burns, III/ 

ROBERT D. BURNS, III 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –2– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

RICHARD J. MALOUF, Appellant 

No. 05-19-00342-CV V. 

SHAMOUN & NORMAN, LLP, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-07224. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns. 

Justices Molberg and Nowell participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. 

 It is ORDERED that appellee SHAMOUN & NORMAN, LLP recover its costs of this 

appeal from appellant RICHARD J. MALOUF. 

Judgment entered April 9, 2019
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Brigante, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vinik, J.), rendered July 12, 1984, convicting him of unlawfully offering for sale motor vehicle parts with altered vehicle identification numbers, criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review (1) the denial (Broomer, J.), after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence, and (2) the denial (Broomer, J.), without a hearing, of the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 330.30 (1) to set aside the jury verdict. By order dated December 9, 1985, this court remitted the matter to Criminal Term to hear and report, after a reopened suppression hearing, and held the appeal in abeyance in the interim *(see, People v Brigante,*115 AD2d 547). Criminal Term has now complied.

Justice Niehoff has been substituted for former Justice O’Connor *(see,*22 NYCRR 670.2 [c]).

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, the indictment is dismissed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for the purpose of entering an order in its discretion pursuant to CPL 160.50.

Inasmuch as the statutory authority pursuant to which the police officers acted in searching the defendant’s premises *(see,*Vehicle and Traffic Law § 415-a [5] [a]; NY City Charter § 436) *695has now been held to be an unconstitutional infringement upon the right to be protected against unreasonable searches and seizures *(see, People v Burger,*67 NY2d 338, *cert granted*— US —, 107 S Ct 61), the defendant’s conviction, based on his offering for sale and possession of stolen automobile parts and on the discovery of a gun on the premises which was recovered as a direct result of the unconstitutional search, can no longer stand *(see, e.g., People v Vitti,*121 AD2d 664). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Niehoff and Weinstein, JJ., concur. *[See,*131 Misc 2d 708.]
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I,
Mitchell K. Dauerman, Chief Financial Officer of The Ultimate Software Group,
Inc., hereby certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that this Annual
Report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d))
and that the information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly
represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of The Ultimate Software Group, Inc.




/s/ Mitchell K.
Dauerman


Mitchell
K. Dauerman


Chief
Financial Officer




(Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)




Date:           March
5, 2010





72
Glen Canyon Dam Technical Work Group Meeting

January 20-21, 1998

List of Attachments

No. Subject Author / Presenter

1 List of Attendees

2 GCD AMP Program Roles and Responsibilities,

Schedules & Process Integration

C. Harris

3a Estimated Effects on Downstream Resources from

short duration (2-4 days), 45,000 cfs releases from

GCD, between the months of January to July

B. Ralston

3b Figures Associated with effects of Matrix B. Ralston

3c Problems and Concerns B. Ralston

3d Recommendations B. Ralston

3e Draft Research and Monitoring Plan for an AMP

Experimental 45,000 cfs BHBF from GCD Jan to July

1998

D. Garrett

4a Impacts of November 1997 31,000 cfs test flow D. Garrett

4b Overhead Presentation T. Melis

4c Climate and the Colorado River: The Limits of

Management

T. Melis

5a General Planning Guidelines for BHBF as adopted by

the AMWG

B. Winfree

5b BHBF Compliance Timetable for Spring 1998 B. Winfree

5c Section 7 and NEPA compliance Timetable for Spring

1998 BHBF revised

B. Winfree

5d GCMRC Contingency Monitoring Program of

Anticipated and Unanticipated High Flows from GCD in

Glen and Grand Canyons, AZ

D. Garrett

6 Revised Discussion Paper TWG Meeting Science

Advisory Board

B. Gold

7 Email Potential Problems: Timeframe M. Matter

8 The Endangered Kanab Ambersnail in Grand Canyon:

Ongoing studies & Management Actions A Briefing for

GC TWG

D. Kubly

9a FY98 Needs in Advance for FY2000 Technology

Upgrades for System Wide Channel Mapping

D. Garrett

9b FY 99 Pilot Studies for Use of “LYDAR” Mapping D. Garrett

9c FY2000 Channel Mapping Efforts with LYDAR and

Multi-Beam Acoustic Hydrography Technology

D. Garrett
[No. 10947.

*En Banc.*

January 3, 1913.]

#### The State of Washington, *on the Relation of Hans Bugge, Plaintiff,*v. M. E. Hay, *as Governor etc., Respondent.*
      *1*

Application filed in the supreme court December 20, 1912, for a writ of mandate to secure a certificate of election.

Denied.

*J. A. Sorley,*for relator.

*The Attorney General*and *J. T. S. Lyle, Assistant,*for respondent.

Reported in 128 Pac. 1058.

Per Curiam.

For the reasons stated in *State ex rel. Sampson v. Superior Court, ante*p. 484, 128 Pac. 1054, the application for a writ of mandate is denied in this case.

Ellis and Main, JJ., took no part.
Robert E. Sabido, OSB No. 964168 

rsabido@cosgravelaw.com 

COSGRAVE VERGEER KESTER LLP 

888 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 500 

Portland, Oregon 97204 

Telephone: (503) 323-9000 

Facsimile: (503) 323-9019 

Attorneys for Defendant 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

MEDFORD DIVISION 

DEBBIE WOOD, 

Plaintiff, 

Case No. 1 : 15-cv-02326-AA 

v. 

OREGON ONE, INC., 

Defendant. 

STIPULATED JUDGMENT 

OF DISMISSAL 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties that all of plaintiff's 

claims against defendant shall be dismissed with prejudice and without attorney fees or 

costs to either party. 

DATED: August 2, 2016 

TRIGSTED LAW GROUP, P.C. COSGRAVE VERGEER KESTER LLP 

ls/Joshua R. Trigsted ls/Robert E. Sabido 

Joshua R. Trigsted, OSB No. 065316 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Robert E. Sabido, OSB No. 964168 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Ill 

Ill 

Ill 

Page 1 - STIPULATED JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL 

Co$grave Vergeer Kester LLP 

Attorneys 

888 SN Fifth Averllle, Su lie 5-00 

Porthnd, Oregon 97204 

Telephone: \5-03) 323-9000 Faes Emile: (503) 313-9019 

2602916 

Case 1:15-cv-02326-AA Document 14 Filed 08/03/16 Page 1 of 2
Based on the parties' stipulation, it is 

ADJUDGED that all of plaintiff's claims against defendant are dismissed with 

prejudice and without attorney fees or costs to either party. 

DATED: Augu~, 2016 

Ann L. Aiken 

United States District Court Judge 

Page 2 - STIPULATED JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL 

Cosgrave Vergffr KesterlLP 

Attomeys 

eaa !NI Fifth Aveooe, Su~e 500 

Portland, Oregon 97204 

Tl!!ephone: (503) 323-9000 Fac•!m~: (50:3) 323-9019 

2602916 

Case 1:15-cv-02326-AA Document 14 Filed 08/03/16 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32(a)
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Murray United Development Corp.
on Form 10-KSB for the period ending July 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Dwight Foster, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date:  October 24, 2006                       / s /  Dwight Foster
                                              -----------------------
                                              DWIGHT FOSTER,
                                              Chief Executive Officer