alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2009241EN.01000801.xml

| 12.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 241/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 241/8

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 7 September 2009

appointing one Austrian member of the Committee of the Regions

(2009/702/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 263 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Austrian Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 24 January 2006, the Council adopted Decision 2006/116/EC appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2006 to 25 January 2010 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 24 January 2006, the Council adopted Decision 2006/116/EC appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2006 to 25 January 2010 (1).

| (2) | A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the resignation of Mr Erwin MOHR, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the resignation of Mr Erwin MOHR,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following is hereby reappointed to the Committee of the Regions as a member for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2010:

Mr Erwin MOHR, Gemeinderat in Markt Wolfurt (change of mandate).

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 7 September 2009.

For the Council

The President

E. ERLANDSSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 56, 25.2.2006, p. 75.

1

---
# C_2009302EN.01000101.xml

| 12.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 302/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 302/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5684 — BNP Paribas Assurance/Fortis Insurance International/UBI Assicurazioni)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 302/01

On 4 December 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5684. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5684. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Torrel Smith, Appellant.

[944 NYS2d 289] —

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Zambelli, J.), rendered July 27, 2010, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

After a jury trial, the defendant was convicted of robbery in the first degree. The complainant had identified the defendant *1146in a lineup, and subsequently identified the defendant in court as the person who, with another unidentified man, had robbed him at gunpoint. The complainant testified that the defendant approached him and asked him for the time, and when the complainant took his cell phone out of his pocket, the defendant brandished a gun. The defendant’s cohort came up from behind the complainant. The defendant demanded the complainant’s cell phone and the complainant gave it to him. The defendant reached into the complainant’s pockets and took from the complainant his money, his credit and debit cards, and his ID and bartending license. The defendant and his cohort then fled.

The defendant contends that the Supreme Court’s ruling allowing the People to elicit testimony from police witnesses regarding the description given to them by the complainant of the perpetrator with the gun served to improperly bolster the complainant’s identification testimony. This contention is unpreserved for appellate review insofar as it relates to Officer Burke’s testimony, as the defendant registered only a general one-word objection to such testimony *(see generally People v Brooks,*89 AD3d 746 [2011]; *People v Mullings,*83 AD3d 871 [2011] ). The defendant’s argument that he was deprived of a fair trial under the state and federal constitutions is also unpreserved for appellate review since he did not raise this specific objection before the Supreme Court *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Hawkins,*11 NY3d 484, 492 [2008]; *see generally People v Wall,*92 AD3d 812 [2012]; *People v Lynch,*92 AD3d 805 [2012] ).

In any event, the defendant’s contentions are without merit. The challenged testimony was properly admitted to assist the jury in evaluating the complainant’s opportunity to observe the perpetrator at the time of the crime and the jury was instructed to consider the testimony for this purpose alone *(see People v Ragunauth,*24 AD3d 472 [2005]; *see also People v Linton,*62 AD3d 722 [2009]; *People v Roman,*5 AD3d 311 [2004]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Skelos, J.P., Florio, Eng and Roman, JJ., concur.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1691 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prohibit an institution 

of higher education located in the United States from participating 

in student assistance programs under title IV of such Act if the institution bans the display of the flag of the United States on its campus. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 26, 2015 

Mr. DUFFY (for himself, Mr. FORTENBERRY, and Mr. NEWHOUSE) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 

the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prohibit 

an institution of higher education located in the United 

States from participating in student assistance programs 

under title IV of such Act if the institution bans the 

display of the flag of the United States on its campus. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Federal Funds 

5 Without the American Flag Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1691 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING PARTICIPATION IN FEDERAL ASSIST2 ANCE PROGRAMS BY INSTITUTIONS OF HIGH3 ER EDUCATION BANNING DISPLAY OF FLAG 

4 OF UNITED STATES ON CAMPUS. 

5 Section 487(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 

6 (20 U.S.C. 1094(a)) is amended by adding at the end the 

7 following new paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(30) The institution will not ban the display of 

9 the flag of the United States on its campus, except 

10 that this paragraph does not apply to an institution 

11 described in section 102(a)(1)(C).’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                            SENIOR FINANCIAL OFFICERS
                                 CODE OF ETHICS

GENERAL PHILOSOPHY

The honesty, integrity and sound judgement of senior financial officers is
fundamental to the reputation and success of National Processing. While all
employees, officers, and directors are required to adhere to the National
Processing, Inc. Code of Ethics, the professional and ethical conduct of senior
financial officers is essential to the proper function and success of National
Processing as a leading merchant services provider.

SENIOR FINANCIAL OFFICERS CODE OF ETHICS

To the best of their knowledge and ability, senior financial officers of
National Processing performing accounting, auditing, financial management or
similar functions must:

     o    Act with honesty and integrity, avoid actual or apparent conflicts of
          interest in personal and professional relationships.

     o    Provide colleagues with information that is accurate, complete,
          objective, relevant, timely and understandable.

     o    Comply with applicable laws, rules and regulations of federal, state,
          and local governments (both United States and foreign) and other
          appropriate private and public regulatory agencies.

     o    Act in good faith, with due care, competence and diligence, without
          misrepresenting material facts or allowing independent judgement to be
          subordinated.

     o    Respect the confidentiality of information acquired in the course of
          employment.

     o    Share knowledge and maintain skills necessary and relevant to National
          Processing's needs.

     o    Proactively promote ethical and honest behavior within the National
          Processing environment.

     o    Assure responsible use of and control of all assets, resources and
          information of National Processing.


All senior financial officers are expected to adhere to both the National
Processing, Inc. Code of Ethics and the Code of Ethics for Senior Financial
Officers at all times. The


<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


board of directors shall have the sole and absolute discretionary authority to
approve any deviation or waiver from the Code of Ethics for Senior Financial
Officers. Any waiver and the grounds for such waiver for a senior financial
officer shall be promptly disclosed through a filing with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on Form 8-K. Additionally, any change of this Code of Ethics
for senior financial officers shall be promptly disclosed to shareholders.
HUALAPAI NATIVE FISH REARING FAC

Hualapai Reservation, Peach Springs, Arizo
PURPOSE

• Address the immediate need for a re

facility for Razorback suckers (Xyrauchen texanus), Humpback ch(Gila cypha), and other endangered and/or native species.

• Design and implement plans to reco

native species in Grand Canyon.
BACKGROUND

• March of 1995. BOR funded a Feasibility 

Study for the Construction and Operatioan Endangered Fish Rearing Facility on tHualapai Reservation.

• November of 1995. BOR funded the 

Environmental Assessment of this projec

• Frazier Wells was chosen as the Preferred 
WELL HOUSE

• Drilled in 1973• Depth to water is at 

160’

• 6” casing
AQUIFER TEST

*Continuous sustainability of 40 gal/min without significant impact to the other wells in the area
Cations (mg/l) Anions

pH EC

(mmhs

)

TDS

mg/l

%

NA

NA K Ca Mg CO3 HCO3 

1. 2. 3. 4. 7.4 401 237 9.9 10 0 76 7 0 219 5. 7.5 405 247 9.6 10 1 75 6 0 213 6. 7.6 413 258 10.

3

10 1 68 6 0 217 

WATER QUALITY

* EPA Source Water Approved
NATIVE TREE NURSERY

RACEWAYS

PONDS AND RACEWAY TO BE COMPLETED
SUMP PUMP

• Re-circulates the wthe de-nitrification prest of the ponds withof the well• Powered by electric
PROPANE GAS GENERATOR

*21KW*For use during times of no electricity
FISH DATA

June 2003

• Average length for for 100 Razorbacks sampled wa• Lengths ranged from 19.5cm – 33.8cm• 5 of 468 Razorbacks taken in one seine haul showe• No parasites observed• 107 fish > 30cm were pit tagged and released into L
•Non-intensive care for the fish

• Stimulated algae and zooplankton growth with • We have received 4 bags of razorback feed
FUTURE PLANS

• We received $249, 376 from the USFWS• We received $10,000 from the BIA

* Completion of the remaining 4-1/2 acre p

* Install air and water lines and drain lines* Connect last 8-1/2 acre ponds to re-circu

system

* Construct a more efficient irrigation syste

utilizing the effluent water of the facility

* Construct sewage and install water and 

electricity to housing facility
AMOUNT OF MONEY 

INVESTED TO DATE

• BOR $260,000• BIA FISH HATCHERY MAINTENA

- $96,000

• HUALAPAI WILDLIFE, FISHERIES

AND PARKS - $225,000
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       7,496,018
<SECURITIES>                                16,878,625
<RECEIVABLES>                            1,046,826,610
<ALLOWANCES>                               102,945,541
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       8,087,911
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,864,390
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,083,141,194
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       294,287
<OTHER-SE>                                 146,611,977
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,083,141,194
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           123,587,706
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            35,885,962
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            44,388,305
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          13,131,530
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             30,181,909
<INCOME-TAX>                                11,469,125
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         18,712,784
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                18,712,784
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.57
        

</TABLE>
# L_2009315EN.01002401.xml

| 2.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 315/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 315/24

---

COMMISSION DECISION

of 30 November 2009

correcting Directive 2003/23/EC amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC to include imazamox, oxasulfuron, ethoxysulfuron, foramsulfuron, oxadiargyl and cyazofamid as active substance

(notified under document C(2009) 9349)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/874/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market (1), and in particular Article 6(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Directive 2003/23/EC (2) contains an error concerning the minimum purity of the active substance oxasulfuron. That error must be corrected. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Directive 2003/23/EC (2) contains an error concerning the minimum purity of the active substance oxasulfuron. That error must be corrected.

| (2) | The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

In the Annex to Directive 2003/23/EC, in the row concerning oxasulfuron, in the fourth column (purity), the words ‘960 g/kg’ are replaced by the words ‘930 g/kg’.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 November 2009.

For the Commission

Androulla VASSILIOU

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 230, 19.8.1991, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 81, 28.3.2003, p. 39.

2

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                       LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


                               Dura Operating Corp.
                            Dura de Mexico S.A. de C.V.
                                MC Holding Corp.
                         Reom Industries (AUST) Pty Ltd.
                        Kimanus Vermogensverwaltungs GmbH
                 Dura Automotive Systems, Inc. Shifter Operations
                       Dura Automotive Systems Export, Inc.
                            Dura Shifter Holding Corp.
                                 Thixotech Inc.
                            Dura/Excel do Brasil LTDA
                        Pollone S.A. Industria E Comerica
                         Talia Vermogensverwaltungs GmbH
                              Vofa S.A., Barcelona
                         Dura Automotive Systems France
                      Dura Automotive Systems, Inc. Column 
                              Shifter Operations
                           Dura Shift Systems, Inc.
                      Dura Automotive Systems (Canada) Ltd.
WILBORN LAW OFFICE, P.C.

TIM WILBORN, Attorney at Law — OSB # 944644

tim@wilbornlaw.com

P.O. Box 370578

Las Vegas, NV 89137

Voice: (702) 240-0184

Fax: (503) 926-9133

 Attorney for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON

YURIE ELZEA, Case No. 1:15-cv-01402-JE

Plaintiff,

vs. PROPOSED ORDER

COMMISSIONER of Social Security,

Defendant.

Attorneys’ fees in the amount of $9,195.25 are hereby awarded to Attorney Tim Wilborn

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Previously, this court awarded fees pursuant to the Equal Access

To Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. When issuing the § 406(b) check, the agency is directed

to subtract the amount of the EAJA fee previously received by the attorney and to send to Plaintiff’s

attorney, Tim Wilborn, at the address above, the balance of $2,661.93, minus any user fee. Any

amount withheld after all administrative and court attorneys fees are paid should be released to the

claimant.

DATED this ____ day of ________________, 2018.

__________________________________________

United States District Court or Magistrate Judge

Presented by:

s/ Tim Wilborn, OSB # 944644

(702) 240-0184

 Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER - Page 1

15th March

/s/ John Jelderks

XXXXXXXXXX
Page 1 – DECLARATION OF JESSE MERRITHEW 

Jesse Merrithew, OSB No. 074564 

Email: jesse@lmhlegal.com 

Levi Merrithew Horst PC 

610 SW Alder Street, Suite 415 

Portland, Oregon 97205 

Telephone: (971) 229-1241 

Facsimile: (971) 544-7092 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

 

JAKE RYAN, et al.,

 Defendants. 

 Case No.: 3:16-CR-00051-BR-26 

DECLARATION OF JESSE 

MERRITHEW IN SUPPORT OF 

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO 

REVOKE DETENTION ORDER

 

I, Jesse Merrithew, make this Declaration under penalty of perjury: 

1. I represent the defendant, Jake Ryan, in the above-entitled case. 

2. The following materials were delivered to me by Roxsanna Ryan, Jake Ryan’s 

mother: 

a. Attached hereto as Exhibit A are letters of support from various members of 

the community that Jake Ryan resides in, Plains, Montana; 

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 622 Filed 05/31/16 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 – DECLARATION OF JESSE MERRITHEW LEVI MERRITHEW HORST PC 

 610 SW Alder Street, Ste 415

Portland, Oregon 97205 

b. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a petition, addressed to the court, and signed 

by members of the community, requesting Jake Ryan’s release and attesting 

that Jake Ryan does not pose any type of danger to them. 

3. Attached hereto as Exhibit C is the CV of Dr. Genevieve Arnaut.

4. On this day, I spoke with Tom Rummel, Sanders County Sheriff. I asked Sheriff 

Rummel if he still supported Mr. Ryan’s release from custody and return to his 

community and Sheriff Rummel told me that he did. I asked if he would be willing to 

serve as a local supervisor to Mr. Ryan if the Court ordered it, and he said he would 

be willing to do so. If the Court orders Mr. Ryan to check in with the sheriff on a 

daily basis, Sheriff Rummel is happy to assist. Sheriff Rummel further told me that, 

should Mr. Ryan violate any of the conditions of his release agreement, he would 

immediately notify the federal authorities and assist in bringing Mr. Ryan into 

custody if necessary. 

DATED this 31st day of May, 2016 

 By: /s Jesse Merrithew 

 Jesse Merrithew, OSB No. 074564 

 Attorney for Jake Ryan 

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 622 Filed 05/31/16 Page 2 of 2
# C_2006297EN.01001301.xml

| 7.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/13

---

NOTICE TO IMPORTERS

NOTICE TO IMPORTERS

Imports into the Community of products from Montenegro

(2006/C 297/05)

By a notice to importers published in
  Official Journal No C 14 of 20.1.2004, page 2, the Commission informed operators presenting documentary evidence of origin with a view to securing preferential treatment for all products imported from Serbia and Montenegro to take all the necessary precautions, since the release of the goods in question for free circulation may give rise to a customs debt. The notice was based on the existence of doubts that products imported from Serbia and Montenegro under the preferential arrangements were actually and properly subject to the verification of their originating status as required by Community law. The notice did not apply to Kosovo as defined by the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1244 of 10 June 1999.

Official Journal

Council Regulation (EC) 1946/2005 of 14 November 2005 amending Regulation (EC) No 2007/2000 introducing exceptional trade measures for countries and territories participating in or linked to the European Union's Stabilisation and Association process, introduced, as of 1.1.2006, three separate origins in relation to the autonomous trade measures in line with the three separate customs territories: ‘Serbia’ origin, ‘Montenegro’ origin and ‘Kosovo’ origin. This distinction remains valid following the decision on the independence of Montenegro last May.

The main findings of the monitoring mission conducted by the Commission's services in Serbia and in Montenegro indicate that in Serbia the necessary elements are in place for the customs administration to properly manage and control the preferential arrangements when exporting the products to the Community as well as to other Balkan countries. In relation to Montenegro, however, some improvements are still needed concerning the legal aspects and the practice when performing controls on origin.

The conditions for a proper functioning of the preferential arrangements having thus been restored in the case of Serbia, the notice to importers concerning imports into the Community of products from Serbia and Montenegro shall be withdrawn with regard to Serbia but maintained with regard to imports into the Community of all products from Montenegro. The notice does not apply to Kosovo as defined by the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1244 of 10 June 1999.

Therefore, Community operators presenting documentary evidence of origin with a view to securing preferential treatment for all products imported from Montenegro are advised to take all the necessary precautions, since the release of the goods in question for free circulation may give rise to a customs debt.

This notice replaces the one published in
  Official Journal No C 14 of 20.1.2004, page 2.

Official Journal

---