Programmatic Agreement Signatory 

Programmatic Agreement Signatory 

● History History

● 2004: Letter to all current signat 2004: Letter to all current signatories requesting comment on t

ories requesting comment on t

CREDA, Western and BIA as signatories to the PA. CREDA, Western and BIA as signatories to the PA.

● 2004: Responses from ACHP, Arizona SHPO, NPS and Ho 2004: Responses from ACHP, Arizona SHPO, NPS and Hopi que

pi que

addition. addition.

● 2005: Letter to all signatories responding point 2005: Letter to all signatories responding point-by-point to que

point to que

signature page requesting signature and concurrence. Only CR

BIA and Zuni signed and returned the PA signature page. Ema

BIA and Zuni signed and returned the PA signature page. Ema

ACHP and Arizona SHPO asserted tha ACHP and Arizona SHPO asserted that the PA would have to be 

t the PA would have to be 

to signatory additions. They do to signatory additions. They do not object to the addition of Cand BIA if this is accomplished. and BIA if this is accomplished. They further assert that GCMR

a signatory to the new PA. ignatory to the new PA.

● 2005: Denver offic 2005: Denver office of the ACHP is shut down as a consequenc

e of the ACHP is shut down as a cons

equenc

ACHP representative to the AMP (Marge ACHP representative to the AMP (Marge Nowick) uses last two 

) uses last two 

employment working with the Arizona SHPO to rewrite the PA. employment working with the Arizona SHPO to rewrite the PA.

● New draft PA appears to commit sam New draft PA appears to commit same errors as the original by 

 errors as the original by 

combine NHPA and GCPA in a sing combine NHPA and GCPA in a single document. It also incorpo

le document. It also incorpo

as a signatory without requesting participation. as a signatory without requesting participation.
Programmatic Agreement Signatory 

Programmatic Agreement Signatory 

● Options Options

● Rewrite the PA to cover sec Rewrite the PA to cover section NHPA 106 and GCPA complianc

tion NHPA 106 and GCPA complianc

signatory process with the new additions. signatory process with the new additions.

● Await the recommendations of the GLCA and GRCA treatment 

Await the recommendations of the GLCA and GRCA treatment 

■ Enter into and MOA for treatment Enter into and MOA for treatment with A

with 

implement treatment and satisfy lement treatment and satisfy NHPA 

NHPA 

Terminate the current PA. Terminate the current PA.

■ Develop a new PA restricted to long Develop a new PA restricted to long-ter

ter

● Consider additional options in Consider additional options in consultation with NPS and Arizon

consultation with NPS and Arizon
GLCA Treatment Plan GLCA Treatment Plan

● 2004: Cooperative Agr 2004: Cooperative Agreement with NNAD eement with NNAD

● 100K Obligated 100K Obligated

● 2005: Field work completed 2005: Field work completed

● Archaeological assessment of sign Archaeological assessment of significance complete ificance completed an

d an

to PA group for review

● 2006: Geomorp Geomorphological hological assessment submitted for review. assessment submitted for review.● 2006: Treatment recommendations in progress. Treatment p

2006: Treatment recommendations in progress. Treatment p

sufficient data for an IGCE for FY08 treatment implementatio

sufficient data for an IGCE for FY08 treatment implementatio

● FY07: budget r FY07: budget request will reflect necessary funding for Native 

equest will reflect necessary funding for Native 

NPS and Arizona SHPO consultation. NPS and Arizona SHPO consultation.
GRCA Treatment Plan GRCA Treatment Plan

● 2005: CES 2005: CESU cooperative agreement with USU. U cooperative agreement with USU. 

● 250K obligated for FY05 AMWG recommendation. 0K obligated for FY05 AMWG recommendation.● 155K obliga 155K obligated for FY06 250K AMWG recommendation. ted for FY06 250K AMWG recommendation.● Remainder h Remainder held in abeyance if de eld in abeyance if defined tasks cannot be accomplish fined tasks cannot be accomplished. ● ZCRE to accomplish archaeological ZCRE to accomplish archaeological requirements u requirements under subcontract nder subcontract with 

with 

● NPS to acc NPS to accomplish logistic assist omplish logistic assistance under subcontract with USU nder subcontract with USU.

● 2006: Preliminary in 06: Preliminary in-depth assessment of extant GIS, depth assessment of extant GIS, map, and database informa● 2006: Preliminary assessment of 06: Preliminary assessment of geomorphological geomorphological models completed by USU. models completed by USU.● First field work sch First field work scheduled for March 2006. eduled for March 2006.● Field work and first drafts of recommended treatment plans to be Field work and first drafts of recommended treatment plans to be completed by J

mpleted by J

● Treatment plan will include sufficient data for an IGCE f Treatment plan will include sufficient data for an IGCE for FY08 or FY08 treatment implem

treatment implem

● FY07: budget request will reflect 7: budget request will reflect necessary funding for Native A necessary funding for Native American, NPS and 
NPS Mitigation Project for 10 Threatene

NPS Mitigation Project for 10 Threatene

● Testing, Excavation, Interp Testing, Excavation, Interpretation and Stabilization of 10 Nati tion and Stabilization of 10 National Re

onal Re

(B:15:138, C:02:096, (B:15:138, C:02:096, C:13:010, C:13:070, C: C:13:010, C:13:070, C:13:099, C:13:100, C:1 13:099, C:13:100, C:13:2

3:2

and G:03:020) located along the Colorado River corridor. and G:03:020) located along the Colorado River corridor.

● Monitoring and consultation bac Monitoring and consultation background. kground.

● Preservation efforts. Preservation efforts.

● Monitor observations of sediment depletion and visitation. Monitor observations of sediment depletion and visitation.

● Inherent overlap between Reclamat Inherent overlap between Reclamation and NPS NHPA responsibiliti ion and NPS NHPA responsibilities.

● GRCA funding source. GRCA funding source.

● Review sched Review schedule. 

● Tribal p Tribal participation. articipation.

● Native A Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act. merican Graves Protection and Repatriation Act.