alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent, <br><br>against<br><br>Joel McDonald, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (John Cataldo, J.H.O.), rendered September 18, 2014, after a nonjury trial, convicting him of disorderly conduct, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (John Cataldo, J.H.O.), rendered September 18, 2014, reversed, on the law, the accusatory instrument dismissed and fine, if paid, remitted.</p><p>We agree with defendant that the accusatory instrument charging him with disorderly conduct under Penal Law ยง 240.20(1) is jurisdictionally defective. Allegations that defendant was "screaming at others . . .  'You [expletive deleted] better buy my CD and stop asking for directions,'" did not constitute "violent, tumultuous or threatening behavior" (<i>see</i> Penal Law ยง 240.20[1]; <i>see also </i>William C. Donnino, Practice Commentaries, McKinneys Cons Laws of NY, Book 39, Penal Law ยง 240.05 at 13 ["The phrase  'tumultuous and violent conduct' means  'much more than mere loud noise or ordinary disturbance. It is designed to connote frightening mob behavior involving ominous threats of injury, stone throwing or other such terrorizing acts'"). Nor did the statement constitute a direct and credible threat that defendant would harm anyone (<a href="../2015/2015_50587.htm" target="_blank"><i>see People v Moreno</i>, 47 Misc 3d 138</a>[A], 2015 NY Slip Op 50587[U] [App Term, 2nd, 11th and 13th Dists [2015]), <i>lv denied </i>25 NY3d 1168 [2015]; <a href="../2015/2015_51274.htm" target="_blank"><i>People v. Ferguson</i>, 48 Misc 3d 1226</a>[A], 2015 NY Slip Op 51274[U] [Crim. Ct., NY County 2015).</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: December 14, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
GCMRC Proposed draft  12‐18‐09

1

AGENDA

GCMRC FY 09 Annual Project Reporting Meeting

January 19‐20, 2010

AZ Dept of Water Resources

3550 N. Central Avenue

Phoenix AZ

602‐771‐8500

January 19, 2010    Project Title         Presenter

0930       Introductions and Objectives     Hamill

1000       Historical Data for Lake Powell     Vernieu

1030       Aquatic Foodbase         Kennedy

1100       NSE/Fall Steady Flow Study     Yard/Pine

   

1130       Rainbow Trout Early Life History     Korman

         

Noon       LUNCH

0100       Lees Ferry         Makinster    

0130       Mainstem Electrofishing and Mechanical   

     Removal         Makinster   

   

0200       Lower 1200/Remote Antenna Array    Brian Clark/B. Persons

    

0230       LCR Population Estimates/C.F. Translocation Vanhaverbeke   

   

0300       BREAK

0315       Tribal Monitoring         Berry?

0345       Archaeological Site Treatment Plan     Berry?
GCMRC Proposed draft  12‐18‐09

2

0415       Cultural Monitoring R&D     Fairley

0445       Recreation Studies         Fairley/NPS   

   

0515       AJOURN

January 20, 2010    Project Title         Presenter

0800       DASA 12.D2.09: Grand Canyon Integrated   Paul Alley

Oracle Database Management System    

0845       DASA 12.D1.09:2009 Overflight and  

      Integrated data analysis/modeling Phil Davis /Tom Gushue

0915       DASA 12.D5.09: GIS General Support for        

      Integrated Analyses and Projects Tom Gushue

0945       NPS – tentative recreation

1000       BREAK

1015       Channel Mapping/Control Network    Grams

1045       Integrated Flow‐Sed‐Temp Modeling    Wright

1115       Downstream Water Quality     Topping

1145       LUNCH

     March 2008 High Flow Experimental Project Reports

0100       Project 1.A: Sand Budgeting     Topping

0130       Project 1.B: Eddy Modeling     Wright

0200       Project 1.C: Sandbar Changes     Hazel

0230       Project 1.D: Backwaters       Grams

0300       BREAK

0315       Project 2: Terrestrial Vegetation     Ralston

0345       Project 3: Influence on Aquatic Food    Kennedy
GCMRC Proposed draft  12‐18‐09

3

0415       Project 4.A: Influence on Rainbow Trout   Korman    

     Project 4.B: Rainbow Trout Movement    Hilwig

0500       Project 5: Influence on Quality of Water   Vernieu

0530       AJOURN
ORDER GRANTING TERMINATION OF SUPERVISION ( 10/2018) 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

ORDER GRANTING TERMINATION OF SUPERVISION ( 10/2018) 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

vs. 

Johnathan Courtney

 DOCKET NO. 3:15CR00360-1 JO 

ORDER GRANTING TERMINATION 

OF SUPERVISION PRIOR TO 

EXPIRATION DATE 

Defendant. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, in the interests of justice, the Court grants the petition 

and orders that defendant’s term of supervision release be, and hereby is, terminated effective as 

of the date of this Order. 

DATED this _______ day of September, 2021, 

___________________________________ 

 Robert E. Jones 

 Senior U.S. District Judge 

16th

/s/ Robert E. Jones

Case 3:15-cr-00360-JO Document 63 Filed 09/16/21 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,151,718
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  452,216
<ALLOWANCES>                                    53,986
<INVENTORY>                                    784,513
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,365,344
<PP&E>                                       1,669,507
<DEPRECIATION>                                 619,830
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,415,021
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          604,535
<BONDS>                                      1,957,117
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        54,560
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,853,369
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,415,021
<SALES>                                        830,339
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               830,339
<CGS>                                          579,894
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  596,737
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                33,607
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              57,742
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (379,899)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (379,899)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (5,784)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (385,683)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.28)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 169 (Friday, September 3, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 49567]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19038]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--R Consortium, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on August 13, 2021, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), R Consortium, Inc. (``R 
Consortium'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in 
its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, TIBCO Software Inc., Palo Alto, CA; and Moore Foundation, 
Palo Alto, CA, have withdrawn as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and R Consortium intends to file 
additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On September 15, 2015, R Consortium filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on October 2, 2015 (80 FR 59815).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on March 22, 
2021. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on April 8, 2021 (86 FR 18323).

Suzanne Morris,
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2021-19038 Filed 9-2-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
No. 17

- 0520 Filed June 7, 2017
IN THE INTEREST OF C.C., Minor Child, W.C., Mother, Appellant.

________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Clinton County, Phillip J. Tabor , District Associate Judge.

Mother appeals from a dispositional review order. AFFIRMED.

J. David Zimmerman, Clinton, for appellant mother. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Mary A. Triick, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee State. Brian P. Donnelly of Mayer, Lonergan & Rolfes, Clinton, guardian ad litem for minor child.

Considered by Vogel, P.J., and Doyle and McDonald, JJ. Tabor, J., takes no part.2

MCDONALD, Judge. A mother challenges a dispositional review order continuing the out

- of

home placement of her child, C.C. We affirm. The child was initially removed from the mother’s care in Sept ember 2016. See In re C.C. , No. 16

- 1678, 2017 WL 104969, at *1

– 2 (Iowa Ct. App. Jan. 11, 2017). A subsequent review hearing was held in March 2017. The department of human services recommended the child remain in the out

- of

- home placement. In response, counsel for the mother asserted, “[The mother] would very much like to have [C.C.] back home. However, she realizes that he’s doing well and would support the recommendations in the case plan. ” The mother presented no evidence. At the conclusion of the hearing, the court stated it understood continuing the p lacement “is not what Mom wants ” but determined doing so was in the child’s best interest and ordered the existing placement to continue. The mother now challenges that determination. The State arg ues the mother has not preserved error. We agree. See In
re K.R. , No. 16

- 1129, 2016 WL 4803911, at *2 (Iowa Ct. App. Sept. 14, 2016) (finding insufficient to preserve error father’ s statement he “would like to see” the children come home “[i]n the future . . . but not today”). The mother “support [ ed ] the recommendation s ” and did not present any evidence or otherwise challenge the continuing placement. Error was not preserved

. See In re T.J.O. , 527 N.W.2d 417, 420 (Iowa Ct. App. 1994) (“As a general rule, an issue not presented in the juvenile court may not be raised for the first time on appeal.”).
AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6137

TONY BROWN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus ROBERT SMITH, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-588-5-BO) Submitted: March 25, 1999 Decided: March 31, 1999 Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tony Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate ofappealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Brown v. Smith , No. CA-98-588-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 14, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Technical Work Group Meeting 

FINAL AGENDA

Glen Canyon Dam 

Adaptive Management Program 

Technical Work Group Meeting

Bureau of Indian Affairs (2 Arizona Center) 

400 North 5

th Street, 12th Floor, Conference Room A

Phoenix, Arizona May 3, 20004

START

TIME  TOPIC PERSON PURPOSE  MATERIALS

9:30 a.m. Welcome and

Administrative

Norm Henderson

1. Introductions and

Determination of Quorum 

2. Review Action Items from 

March 30­31, 2004

Meeting

3. Approval of March 30­31, 2004, Meeting Minutes 

4. New Business

Agenda

Action Items/

Draft Minutes

10:45 a.m.

Long­term 

Experimental Plan:

Review of AMWG

Charge

GCMRC Information and Discussion AMWG Motion

10:30 a.m.

Long­term 

Experimental Plan:

Review of MATA 

Outcomes 

GCMRC Information and Discussion MATA Reports

12 noon L U N C H

1 p.m.

Long­term 

Experimental Plan:

Develop Process and

Schedule

GCMRC Information and Discussion

GCMRC

Experimental

Table

2:50 p.m. BREAK

3:05 p.m.

Long­term 

Experimental Plan:

Assess Potential

Boundaries for 

Recommended

Actions 

GCMRC Information and Discussion

5 p.m. Wrap­up and Adjourn Norm Henderson
Technical Work Group Meeting 

FINAL  AGENDA

Glen Canyon Dam 

Adaptive Management Program 

Technical Work Group Meeting

Bureau of Indian Affairs (2 Arizona Center) 

400 North 5

th Street, 12th Floor, Conference Room A

Phoenix, Arizona May 4, 20004

START

TIME  TOPIC PERSON PURPOSE  MATERIALS

8 a.m. Welcome and

Administrative Norm Henderson Information and Discussion Agenda

8:15 a.m. Core Monitoring Plan:

Review of Progress 

GCMRC

Information and Discussion

Position

Statement

9:30 a.m. B R E A K

9:45 p.m.

Core Monitoring Plan:

Further Develop

Content, Process, and

Schedule

GCMRC

Information and Discussion

(optional for non­CM ad hoc 

members) 

11:45 a.m. ► Agenda Items for 

future meetings 

Norm Henderson Discussion
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of SRS Labs, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Thomas C.K. Yuen, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:



|Dated: March 13, 2008 |  | By: | /s/THOMAS C.K. YUENThomas C.K. Yuen Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|--------------------- |  | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1467
ROSARIO A. FIORANI, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ALBERT LOWRY; EDUCATION ADVANCEMENT INSTITUTE; ENTREPRENEURIAL SERVICES; ADAM LEVINE; SETH CHARLES BERENZWEIG; SARAH ZAFINNA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:08-cv-00348-LMB-BRP) Submitted: July 31, 2008 Decided: August 7, 2008 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rosario A. Fiorani, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Rosario A. Fiorani, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his “Petition and Motion for Restraining Order and Order to Vacate Unconstitutional Circuit Court’s Order on Violations of Plaintiff’s Civil Rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983,” and his “Extraordinary Complaint and Motion for Removal under 28 U.S.C. § 1443 on Constitutional and Civil Rights Violations,” and dismissing without prejudice his “Notice of Removal under 28 U.S.C. § 1443.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fiorani v. Lowry , No. 1:08-cv-00348-LMB-BRP (E.D. Va. Apr. 21, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 18

- 00362

- CV

Elizabeth Hernandez, Appellant

v.

Leonardo Moya II, Appellee

FROM THE 207TH DISTR ICT COURT OF COMAL C OUNTY NO. C2009

- 0090B, THE HONORABLE RANDAL C. GRAY, JUDGE PRESIDI NG

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellee’s brief was originally due on August 27, 2018. On counsel’s motion

,
the time for filing was extended to October 26, 2018. Appellee’s counsel has now filed a second

motion, requesting that the Court extend the time for filing ap pellee’s brief. We grant in part the

motion for extension of time and order appellee to file a brief no later than December 3 , 2018.

No further extension of time will be granted

, and failure to comply with this order will result in

the case being submitte d to this Court on appellant’s brief alone.

It is ordered on October 19, 2018.

Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Bourland
#### In the Matter of Frederico Gonzalez, Appellant, v Harold J. Smith, as Superintendent of Attica Correctional Facility, Respondent.

— Judgment unanimously affirmed *(see, Matter of Moulier v Smith,*115 AD2d 307). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Flynn, J. — art 78.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Green, Balio and Law-ton, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 USC SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Medallion Financial Corp. (the Company) for the quarter ending June 30, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
based on my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

|                                                    |  |                   
|--------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------
|                                                    | 
|By:                                                 |  | /s/ Alvin Murstein
|Alvin Murstein
Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer
|

Date: August 5, 2010



Page 58 of 59
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

JOHN K. KASHUBA, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

STATE OF OREGON, 

Respondent. 

MCSHANE, Judge: 

Civ. No. 3:15-cv-00082-TC 

OPINION AND ORDER 

Petitioner, prose, brings this petition seeking habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 

2254. Petitioner seeks to challenge thirty-four state court convictions, including seventeen counts 

of making a false claim for health care payment, ORS § 165.692, fifteen counts of theft in the 

first degree, ORS § 164.055, and two counts of unlawfully obtaining a food stamp benefit, ORS 

§ 411.840, because of alleged ineffective assistance of counsel, inclusion of inadmissible 

evidence, and judicial misconduct. See Pet. Writ Habeas Corpus 5-7, ECF No. 2-1. Magistrate 

Judge Thomas Coffin issued a Findings and Recommendation (F&R) on August 11, 2015, in 

which he recommended dismissal without prejudice because petitioner failed to exhaust his state 

court remedies. The matter is now before this Court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B); Fed. R. Civ. 

P. 72(b). 

Because no objections to the F &R were timely filed, this Court reviews only the legal 

principles de novo. See United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en 

1 - OPINION AND ORDER 

Case 3:15-cv-00082-TC Document 18 Filed 08/31/15 Page 1 of 2
bane); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1988). Upon review, 

this Court finds no error in Judge Coffin's F&R, ECF No. 15. 

CONCLUSION 

This Court ADOPTS Judge Coffin's F&R, ECF No. 15, in full. Petitioner Kashuba's 

petition for writ of habeas corpus, ECF No.2, is DENIED without prejudice. Respondent's 

motion to dismiss, ECF No. 14, is GRANTED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this 31 "1r day of IJ "'-1 '2015. 

2 - OPINION AND ORDER 

\ 

Michael J. McShane 

United States District Judge 

Case 3:15-cv-00082-TC Document 18 Filed 08/31/15 Page 2 of 2