alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

DIVALL INSURED INCOME PROPERTIES 2

LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

Certification of Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Divall Insured Income Properties 2 Limited Partnership (the Company) certifies that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|       |  |                |  |                                        |  |    |  |                                       
|------ |  | -------------- |  | -------------------------------------- |  | -- |  | --------------------------------------
|       |  |                |  | THE PROVO GROUP, INC., General Partner
|       |  |                |  |                                       
|Dated: |  | March 27, 2009 |  |                                        |  | By |  | /s/ Bruce A. Provo                    
|       |  |                |  |                                        |  |    |  | President, Chief Executive Officer and
|       |  |                |  |                                        |  |    |  | Chief Financial Officer               

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the
knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1739 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1739

To prohibit the Federal Government from requiring race or ethnicity to 
       be disclosed in connection with the transfer of a firearm.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 13, 2015

 Mrs. Black (for herself, Mr. Poe of Texas, Mr. Fincher, Mr. Duncan of 
Tennessee, Mr. Fleischmann, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Gosar, Mr. Cramer, Mr. 
 Farenthold, Mr. Huelskamp, and Mr. Sessions) introduced the following 
       bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the Federal Government from requiring race or ethnicity to 
       be disclosed in connection with the transfer of a firearm.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``FIREARM Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO REQUIRE RACE OR 
              ETHNICITY TO BE DISCLOSED IN CONNECTION WITH THE TRANSFER 
              OF A FIREARM.

    The Federal Government may not require any person to disclose the 
race or ethnicity of the person in connection with the transfer of a 
firearm to the person.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31.1

ITRONICS INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

CERTIFICATION

I, John W. Whitney, President of ITRONICS INC., certify that:

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of ITRONICS INC.;

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

> 
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls    and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made    known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this    report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the    effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period    covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control    over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent    fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,    the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the smallbusiness issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

> 
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of    internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect    the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial    information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who    have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial    reporting.

 

 

Date: April , 2008/S/ JOHN W. WHITNEY
John W. Whitney

President

(Principal Executive and 

Financial Officer)
Order entered August 29 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 13 - 01150 - CV IN RE RAMIRO CHAPA, Relator Original Proceeding from the 203rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F04 - 36350 - P 

### O RDER Based on the Court’s order of today’s date, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. We ORDER that relator bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1687

To provide for notice to owners of property that may be subject to the

exercise of eminent domain by private nongovernmental entities under

certain Federal authorization statutes, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 26, 1998

Mr. THOMPSON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

A BILL

To provide for notice to owners of property that may be

subject to the exercise of eminent domain by private

nongovernmental entities under certain Federal authorization statutes, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. NOTIFICATION TO PROPERTY OWNERS OF CER4 TAIN EXERCISES OF EMINENT DOMAIN.

5 (a) DEFINITION.—In this section the term ‘‘eminent

6 domain authorization statute’’ means any Federal statute

7 that authorizes a private nongovernmental entity to exer8 cise the right of eminent domain to acquire property if—
2

•S 1687 IS

1 (1) such an entity holds a certificate, license,

2 permit, or other form of authorization from a Fed3 eral agency relating to public necessity, benefit, or

4 convenience; and

5 (2) such an entity is unable to acquire such

6 property by contract.

7 (b) NOTIFICATION.—On the date that a private non8 governmental entity files an application for a certificate,

9 license, permit, or other authorization under an eminent

10 domain authorization statute, the entity shall make a good

11 faith effort to provide notice by certified mail to any per12 son who is the owner of record of any interest in property

13 which may be subject to the exercise of eminent domain

14 under such statute.

15 (c) CONTENT OF NOTICE.—Notice under this section

16 shall include—

17 (1) a specific and conspicuous statement that

18 the private nongovernmental entity is seeking au19 thorization to possibly acquire the property of such

20 owner or a portion or interest thereof through the

21 exercise of eminent domain;

22 (2) a specific and conspicuous description of

23 any right such owner may have to participate in any

24 proceeding relating to the granting of authorization
3

•S 1687 IS

1 to a private nongovernmental entity under the emi2 nent domain authorization statute; and

3 (3) a specific and conspicuous statement of the

4 manner in which the owner may contact any appro5 priate Federal agency relating to the proceeding.

6 (d) APPLICATION TO OTHER STATUTES.—Nothing in

7 this section shall be construed to modify or supersede any

8 law that requires actual notice by certified mail to be time9 ly provided to any affected owner (including any notice

10 required under section 9(b) of the Federal Power Act (16

11 U.S.C. 802(b))).

Æ
Document

[NAME]
MARCH 15, 2020
PERFORMANCE UNITS AWARD LETTER
The Compensation and Management Succession Committee of the Company's Board of Directors has awarded you:
_______ Performance UnitsAward Period: January 1, 2020 – December 31, 2022Grant Date: March 15, 2020
These Performance Units were awarded pursuant to the Protective Life Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), and are subject to the terms and conditions contained in the 2020 Performance Units Award Provisions (“Provisions”), as set forth in Appendix A to this Award Letter, and the Plan. The Plan and the Provisions contain terms and conditions regarding the payment of these Performance Units, termination of employment, tax withholding, non-solicitation of Company employees and customers, regulatory compliance, and other matters, and I encourage you to read the Provisions carefully.
Please retain these documents in your personal records.
             
Richard J. Bielen
President and Chief Executive Officer of Protective Life Corporation
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

JOHN RODNEY VEACH, 

Case No. 3:14-cv-01809-BR 

Petitioner, 

ORDER 

v. 

MARION FEATHER, Warden, 

Respondent. 

BROWN, Judge. 

The Court GRANTS Petitioner's Unopposed Motion to Voluntarily 

Dismiss (#23) without prejudice. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this _:j__ day of May, 2015. 

United States District Judge 

1 - ORDER -

Case 3:14-cv-01809-BR Document 24 Filed 05/08/15 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 166 (Tuesday, August 31, 2021)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 48481]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-18925]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 166 / Tuesday, August 31, 2021 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 48481]]


                Proclamation 10240 of August 26, 2021

                
Honoring the Victims of the Attack in Kabul, 
                Afghanistan

                By the President of the United States of America

                A Proclamation

                As a mark of respect for the U.S. service members and 
                other victims killed in the terrorist attack on August 
                26, 2021, in Kabul, Afghanistan, by the authority 
                vested in me as President of the United States by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, I hereby order that the flag of the United 
                States shall be flown at half-staff at the White House 
                and upon all public buildings and grounds, at all 
                military posts and naval stations, and on all naval 
                vessels of the Federal Government in the District of 
                Columbia and throughout the United States and its 
                Territories and possessions until sunset, August 30, 
                2021. I also direct that the flag shall be flown at 
                half-staff for the same length of time at all United 
                States embassies, legations, consular offices, and 
                other facilities abroad, including all military 
                facilities and naval vessels and stations.

                IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 
                twenty-sixth day of August, in the year of our Lord two 
                thousand twenty-one, and of the Independence of the 
                United States of America the two hundred and forty-
                sixth.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

[FR Doc. 2021-18925
Filed 8-30-21; 8:45 am]
Billing code 3295-F1-P
Glen Canyon Dam Fish 

Exclusion: 

Project Overview 

Clarence Fullard, Reclamation 
Process 

• Engineering team – Reclamation TSC 

•Develop Subject Matter Expert Panel 

•Review exclusion report + other ideas 

•Selection criteria: 

• 1) Demonstrated effectiveness 

• 2) Short deployment time 

•Result: net and/or curtain barrier choses 

•Next steps: 

• 1) Site visit 

• 2) Engineering design 

• 3) Work with contractor 
Net Barrier 

Highline Lake spillway 

barrier net, 363’ long, 

20’ deep. 

Example: Ludington, MI Fish

Barrier Net 

55’ deep, ~3 miles long, installed/removed seasonally 
Thermal Curtain 
Thermal Curtain 
Concept 

Curtain 
Net/Curtain Hybrid 

•Requirements: 

• >1000’ long 

• Thermal curtain ~100’ deep 

• 1⁄4” mesh netting 

• Seamless attachment to canyon wall 

• Possible mid-reservoir support column and shore anchors 
Engineering/Design Concerns 

• Construction access 

• Attachment to canyon wall 

• Middle support 

• Biofouling 

• Other maintenance/cleaning 

• Dam safety 

Lake Huron – Ontario 

Hydro Block Net 
Contact: cfullard@usbr.gov
Exhibit32.1

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Good Times RestaurantsInc. (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, BoydE. Hoback, Chief Executive Officer and Susan M. Knutson, Controller of theCompany, hereby certifies, pursuant to and solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

/s/Boyd E. Hoback                                                                                           /s/Susan M. Knutson       

 

 

BoydE. Hoback                                                                                                  SusanM. Knutson

ChiefExecutive Officer                                                                                    Controller(principal financial officer)

August9, 2006                                                                                                    August9, 2006

 

----
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Pest Management Research: Sidney, MT
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    NPARL
                        Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory
                                    Agricultural Systems Research Unit
                                    Grasshoppers: Their Biology, Identification and ManagementSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Sidney, Montana Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory Pest Management Research PMRU Docs Grasshoppers: Their Biology, Identification and Management: Outbreak and Survey Info Forecast Maps





- NPARL Home
- PMRU Home
- ASRU Home
- Site Highlights
- Outbreak and Survey Info
- ID Tools | Apps
- Grasshopper Management
- IPM Handbook
- USDA Research | Contact Info

Outbreak Info: Grasshopper Forecast 1995headline bar /ARSUserFiles/30320505/grasshopper/Extras/images/Maps/hazard95.jpg < Previous Map    Back to Outbreak Info      Next Map >


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### Johnifer ROSTON *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 05-277

206 S.W.3d 244

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered March 31, 2005

*298
      *Gary W. Potts,*for appellant.

No response.

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Johnifer Roston, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on clerk. His attorney, Gary W. Potts, states in the motion that, at the request of the court reporter, he asked the circuit court, and it granted an extension of time to file the record in this case for the full seven months allowed from the date of entry of the judgment, March 9, 2005. The judge mailed the executed order to Mr. Potts for fifing, but he mistakenly placed the order in his case file, rather than timely filing it with the circuit court clerk. Mr. Potts states that it was his duty to assure that the client’s order extending the time for fifing the record was filed with the circuit court clerk, and he accepts full responsibility for the error.

This court clarified its treatment of motions for rule on clerk and motions for belated appeals in *McDonald v. State,*356 Ark. 106, 146 S.W.3d 883 (2004). There, we said that there are only two possible reasons for an appeal not being timely perfected: either the party or attorney fifing the appeal is at fault, or, there is “good reason.” 356 Ark. at 116, 146 S.W.3d at 891. We explained:

> Where an appeal is not timely perfected, either the party or attorney filing the appeal is at Ault, or there is good reason that the appeal was not timely perfected. The party or attorney filing the appeal is therefore faced with two options. First, where the party or attorney filing the appeal is at fault, fault should be admitted by affidavit filed with the motion or in the motion itself. There is no advantage in declining to admit fault where fault exists. Second, where the party or attorney believes that there is good reason the appeal was not *299perfected, the case for good reason can be made in the motion, and this court will decide whether good reason is present.

*Id.,*146 S.W.3d at 891 (footnote omitted). While this court no longer requires an affidavit admitting fault before we will -consider the motion, an attorney should candidly admit fault where he has erred and is responsible for the failure to perfect the appeal. *See id.*

In accordance with *McDonald v. State, supra,*Mr. Potts has candidly admitted fault. The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Motion granted.
PROPOSAL

Sheep Creek Erosion-Control Structures and Seeding Project

Project Manager Name: Susan Goheen, BLM Grand Staircase Escalante 

 National Monument

Contact Information: Susan Goheen, Soil Scientist

 BLM GSENM 

190 East Center

Kanab, UT 84741

Phone: (435) 644-4324

Email: susan_goheen@blm.gov

Objective

This project will repair erosion-control structures in the Sheep Creek watershed, a tributary to the Paria River, that were built in 1960, and seed the surrounding 

area in native grasses, forbs, and shrubs.

Background

The main source of salinity to the Paria River lies in the geologic strata that Sheep Creek flows through. The erosion-control structures that were built in 1960 

have been very effective in rehabilitating large gullies and preventing overland movement of saline sediment. The structures are beginning to deteriorate. If this 

trend continues, the large amount of sediment deposition that has accumulated behind the erosion-control structures will blow out and discharge the sediment into 

the Paria River. The Paria River is currently on the 303(d) list as impaired due to high levels of total dissolved solids.

The surrounding area was seeded with crested wheat grass years ago and the grass is now dead due to the current drought, leaving extensive areas of bare ground. 

Land managers have a concern that this situation will invite noxious weeds. Planting the area back into native grasses, forbs, and shrubs, better suited for the 

climate and soils, will result in a sustainable and long-term approach to erosion control in the Sheep Creek/Paria watershed. Vegetation monitoring plots will be 

established to monitor the progress of the seeding. Soil erosion bridges will be installed to monitor sheet, rill, and gully erosion.

Deliverables

• Maintenance on erosion-control structures in the watershed.

• Purchase and seed areas surrounding the erosion-control structures.

• Set up vegetation monitoring plots and begin baseline monitoring.

• Submit a progress report that summarizes all work by December 31.

Costs

BLM $60,000

Allotment Permittees $20,000

Basin States Funding $60,000

 TOTAL $140,000
Collasped water-intake

Head cutting through erosion-control 

structure

Sheep Creek 

Erosion Control Project

Tributary to the Paria River

Dead Crested Wheat