alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Adaptive Cropping Systems Laboratory: Beltsville, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Models
                        What Are Crop Simulation Models?
                                    2DSoil Model
                                    Spudsim (Potato) Model
                                    CLASSIM
                    Controlled Environment FacilitiesSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Beltsville, Maryland (BARC) Beltsville Agricultural Research Center Adaptive Cropping Systems Laboratory People





- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People
- Contact Information
- Research Projects
- Publications
- ARS News Articles
- Google Scholar Site
- GitHub Site
- Eunjin Han - CV

Eunjin  Han    Agricultural Engineer /ARSUserFiles/57151/EunjinHan_ACSL.png Research Interests USDA-ARS Long-Term Agroecosystem Research (LTAR) network


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Budget Flip Charts

Actual expenditure column in the budget table 

Concern over terrestrial monitoring trips respecting tribal needs during trips 

Terrestrial monitoring – budget decrease 

In past, most tribal logistics were in PA budget. $15K barely pays for the trip, but no analysis. 

Hopi, Navajo, Paiute tend to take separate trips – integrating terrestrial monitoring by tribes with 

GCMRC transition from PA Æ terrestrial monitoring 

Compliance = NEPA & ESA personnel. If not needed, can carry over. 

Need to plan ahead on NEPA and ESA compliance – not let it hold up the process 

TWG needs to give direction to PA 

GRCA monitoring - GRCA can’t do it for $170K – take it out of GLCA and NN treatment to keep 

NPS monitoring whole 

Intent of cultural monitoring is to ID sites that do not need monitoring to re-program $ to 

treatment 

Treatment plan should be throughout the river corridor. 

More substance on impact of potential cuts 

PA Group cannot make recommendation before 7/7/03. See comment in PA section. 

Don’t want to see treatment $ going away. 

Is it the PA’s responsibility or TWG responsibility to make decision on budget? 

Purpose of GLCA/NN treatment plan and some implementation – BOR’s goal is to have a plan 

and begin implementation in 2004 compliance with NHPA – original was $200K 

Plan would include a site-by-site analysis and recommendation for action. 

Data analysis and field work to maintain integrity of the program (pg. 3, A1) 

B1 – Aquatic FB Monitoring – in house and cooperative agreement with NAU (combination) 

Denny – in-house work won’t continue 

Lake Powell not in budget – funded by BOR – since part of the plan, should be part of the 

budget (ditto KAS taxonomy) 

D4 – consolidation of salary to this line from other eliminated line 
How much of other agencies’ expenditures and work should be show in budget and work plan? 

(D5) AMWG public outreach part of a BOR person (public affairs) – not NPS - concern it won’t 

get done. Æ full-time person? 

Hire someone on contract to get the word out on the program (D5). 

B2 - $856K should be higher to cover downstream of Diamond Creek - cut of $36K, understates 

reality 

C6 – schedule in work plan was not updated – hard to evaluate budget. Recommend it be 

dropped until processing catches up. 

F6 – Aerial photography – consider reprogramming some of this line (may replace some laborintensive river trips) 

Should salaries be included in line items? 

Need accounting for GCMRC personnel costs. 

Replacement power costs - should be included (need # from Clayton Palmer) 

Core monitoring costs – program needs to be agreed to.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Pest Management Research: Sidney, MT
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    NPARL
                        Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory
                                    Agricultural Systems Research Unit
                                    Grasshoppers: Their Biology, Identification and ManagementSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Sidney, Montana Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory Pest Management Research PMRU Docs Grasshoppers: Their Biology, Identification and Management: Outbreak and Survey Info Forecast Maps





- NPARL Home
- PMRU Home
- ASRU Home
- Site Highlights
- Outbreak and Survey Info
- ID Tools | Apps
- Grasshopper Management
- IPM Handbook
- USDA Research | Contact Info

Outbreak Info: Grasshopper Forecast 2002headline bar /ARSUserFiles/30320505/grasshopper/Extras/images/Maps/hazard02.gif < Previous Map    Back to Outbreak Info      Next Map > The data summarized in this map were furnished by the respective state, county, university and federal agencies using a variety of survey methods and analytical techniques. This map was prepared by USDA-APHIS-PPQ in cooperation with CPHST.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7376

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

FLOYD GADSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees, Chief

District Judge. (CR-93-33-MU, CA-95-438-3-MU)

Submitted: April 16, 1998 Decided: April 29, 1998

Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Floyd Gadson, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C.F. Shappert, Assistant

United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Gadson, Nos. CR-93-33-MU; CA-95-438-3-MU

(W.D.N.C. Sept. 10, 1997). We deny Appellant's motion to remand and

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Plant Stress and Germplasm Development Research: Lubbock, TX
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Projects
                        NP 301Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Lubbock, Texas Cropping Systems Research Laboratory Plant Stress and Germplasm Development Research Docs







Businessheadline bar  UniversitiesExtension ServiceTexas Tech UniversityTexas Agriculture Extension ServiceTexas A&M University


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1783

To suspend temporarily the duty on triethyleneglycol bis(2-ethyl hexanoate).

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 17, 1998

Mr. BOND introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on triethyleneglycol bis(2-

ethyl hexanoate).

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TRIETHYLENEGLYCOL BIS(2-ETHYL

4 HEXANOATE).

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

8 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.31.15 Triethyleneglycol bis(2-ethyl

hexanoate) (CAS No. 94–28–

0) (provided for in subheading 2915.90.50) ............. Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2001 ’’.
2

•S 1783 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to articles entered, or

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after

4 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
Exhibit (10)(a)

    

    

    

    

    

    

    Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    

    

    

    

    We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in
      Post-Effective Amendment No. 39 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-141758) and Amendment No. 402 to the 1940 Act Registration
      Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08441), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2020, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln
      Life & Annuity Company of New York and (b) April 15, 2020, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Variable Annuity Account H for the
      registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    May 15, 2020
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1800 Referred in House (RFH)]

  2d Session
                                S. 1800

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 3, 1998

     Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
at 85 Marconi Boulevard in Columbus, Ohio, as the ``Joseph P. Kinneary 
                      United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF JOSEPH P. KINNEARY UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE.

    The Federal building and United States courthouse located at 85 
Marconi Boulevard in Columbus, Ohio, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Joseph P. Kinneary United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ``Joseph P. Kinneary United States Courthouse''.

            Passed the Senate June 2, 1998.

            Attest:

                                                    GARY SISCO,

                                                             Secretary.
```
# EUR-Lex - 52006AP0402 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52006AP0402

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the quality required of shellfish waters (Codified version) (COM(2006)0205 - C6-0152/2006 - 2006/0067(COD)) **

*
Official Journal 308 E , 16/12/2006 P. 0085 - 0085 *

P6_TA(2006)0402

Quality required of shellfish waters ***I

European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the quality required of shellfish waters (Codified version) (COM(2006)0205 — C6-0152/2006 — 2006/0067(COD))

(Codecision procedure — Codification)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2006)0205) [1],

- having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 175(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0152/2006),

- having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 — Accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts [2],

- having regard to Rules 80, 51 and 43 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A6-0313/2006),

1. Approves the Commission proposal;

2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

[2] OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.

--------------------------------------------------
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Columbia Plateau Conservation Research Center: Pendleton, OR
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Related TopicsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Pendleton, Oregon Columbia Plateau Conservation Research Center People & Locations







Amanda  Galvin
                        Columbia Plateau Conservation Research Center

                        




                        
                        Physical Science Technician
                        Phone: (541) 278-4392
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### African Baptist Church in St. Louis, Appellant, v The St. Louis Transfer Company *et al.*

Church. Corporation: beneficiary of trust: case adjudged. The evidence in a contest between two church corporations examined and *held*that defendant is shown to have equitably the better right to recognition as the beneficiary in an ancient con veyance under which both claim title.

*413
      *Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court.*—Hon. Daniel Dillon, Judge.

Affirmed.

*T. J. Cornelius*for appellant.

*Everett W. Pattison*for respondents.

Barclay, J.

— In 1829 a deed to a lot in St. Louis was duly made to Rev. Berry Meacham in trust for the sole use and benefit of the African Baptist Church in St. Louis. The trustee named was the pastor. The church was unincorporated and so remained for many years. A place of worship was erected on the lot and used as such until shortly before this litigation. In 1854 Rev. Berry Meacham died without leaving a will. The property continued in possession of the church congregation as before.

A difference arose in 1882 among the members of the body regarding the selection of a pastor to succeed Elder Thomas Jefferson whose term expired at the beginning of that year. That difference resulted in a division of the church into two separate groups or organizations. One obtained a charter of incorporation in November, 1884, under the name of the beneficiary in the deed to Meacham. It is the plaintiff in the present suit and claims to be identical with the first congregation.

The contention of defendant, the First Colored Baptist Church, is that it is the only authentic original beneficiary; that it was long known as the “African Baptist Church” but that many years ago it adopted its present title by general consent of the congregation and was incorporated by that name in August, 1884.

It appears that in 1883, by an order of the St. Louis circuit court, the members of the board of the defendant *414church, were appointed, by name, trustees in the stead of Rev. Berry Meacham, deceased, to execute the trust created, by the original deed. These trustees sold the old church lot to the St. Louis Transfer Company, defendant, and applied the proceeds towards the purchase of another place of worship for the same congreation in a more eligible site.

The real dispute presented by the pleadings and proofs of both parties is simply as to which one of the two church corporations has equitably the better right to recognition as the genuine original African Baptist Church, the beneficiary in the ancient conveyance first aforesaid.

It is unnecessary to elaborate an extended review of the testimony. It furnishes abundant support to the conclusion reached by Judge Dillon in favor of the defendant church, if, indeed, there may fairly be said to be any substantial conflict of evidence on the material points in it.

The circuit court properly dismissed the petition. Its judgment is affirmed.

The other judges concur.
N O T F O RP U B L IC A T IO N IN W E S T ' S H AWA I # I RE P O R T S A N D P A C IF IC RE P O R T E R



### NO. CAAP-19-0000608

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
O F THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

DOREEN R. McKERNAN and MICHAEL S. McKERNAN,

Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. THE ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF KAMAOLE SANDS, Defendant-Appellant,

and JOHN DOES 1-100; JANE DOES 1-100; DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-100; DOE CORPORATIONS 1-100; and DOE ENTITIES 1-100, Defendants

A PPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT

(CIVIL NO. 18-1-0493(1))

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Leonard, Presiding Judge, Wadsworth and McCullen, JJ.) Upon consideration of Defendant-Appellant the Association of Apartment Owners of Kamaole Sands' Motion for Reconsideration filed herein on August 18, 2022 ( Motion for Reconsideration ), and the records and files herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that said Motion for Reconsideration is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, September 13, 2022. /s/ Katherine G. Leonard Presiding Judge /s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth Associate Judge /s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen Associate Judge

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-19-0000608 13-SEP-2022 01:37 PM Dkt. 61 ODMR