alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Josh Emanuel, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and John Gunn, General Manager and Chief Financial Officer of DataWave Systems Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of DataWave Systems Inc. for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of DataWave Systems Inc.

|Dated: November 12th, 2003 |  |                                            
|-------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------
|                           |  |                                            
|                           |  |                                            
|                           |  | /s/ Josh Emanuel                           
|                           |  | Josh Emanuel                               
|                           |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer       
|                           |  |                                            
|                           |  |                                            
|                           |  |                                            
|                           |  | /s/ John Gunn                              
|                           |  | John Gunn                                  
|                           |  | General Manager and Chief Financial Officer
|                           |  |                                            



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to DataWave Systems Inc. and will be retained by DataWave Systems Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The  schedule  contains  summary   information   extracted  from  the  Financial
statements of the December 31, 1997 Form 10-K of Aircraft  Income  Partners L.P.
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       6,432,713
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,417,636
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,555,035
<PP&E>                                     91,516,052
<DEPRECIATION>                              71,503,840
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,567,247
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,987,008
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  27,580,239
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,567,247
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            8,787,319
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  853,775
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,227,309
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,706,235
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,706,235
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,706,235
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

MEDFORD DIVISION 

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., 

Plaintiff, No. 1:15-cv-129-AA 

vs. 

JUDGMENT 

LEROY WILLOUGHBY, et al., 

Defendants. 

Based on the record, judgment is for Plaintiff Wells 

Fargo Bank, N.A., against Defendant Leroy Willoughby in the 

amount of $97,448.99, plus prejudgment interest calculated 

under 28 U.S.C. § 1961 from April 7, 2009 up to the date of 

this judgment, and post-judgment interest to be calculated 

under 28 U.S.C. § 1961 ~rom the date of this judgment. 

1 - JUDGMENT 

Case 1:15-cv-00129-AA Document 32 Filed 10/14/15 Page 1 of 2
IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this day of October, 2015. 

Ann Aiken 

United States District Judge 

2 - JUDGMENT 

Case 1:15-cv-00129-AA Document 32 Filed 10/14/15 Page 2 of 2
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1667 

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to require publication of 

the basis for determinations that species are endangered species or 

threatened species, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 26, 2015 

Mrs. LUMMIS (for herself, Mr. NEUGEBAUER, Mr. HUIZENGA of Michigan, 

and Mr. COLLINS of Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to require 

publication of the basis for determinations that species 

are endangered species or threatened species, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘21st Century Endan5 gered Species Transparency Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1667 IH

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO PUBLISH ON THE INTERNET THE 

2 BASIS FOR LISTINGS. 

3 Section 4(b) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 

4 (16 U.S.C. 1533(b)) is amended by adding at the end the 

5 following: 

6 ‘‘(9) The Secretary shall make publicly available 

7 on the Internet the best scientific and commercial 

8 data available that are the basis for each regulation, 

9 including each proposed regulation, promulgated 

10 under subsection (a)(1), except that, at the request 

11 of a Governor or legislature of a State, the Secretary 

12 shall not make available under this paragraph infor13 mation regarding which the State has determined 

14 public disclosure is prohibited by a law of that State 

15 relating to the protection of personal information.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Agricultural Genetic Resources Preservation Research: Fort Collins, CO
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Fort Collins, Colorado Center for Agricultural Resources Research Agricultural Genetic Resources Preservation Research Docs Clonal







Solanum - Potatoheadline bar *Solanum* - Potato  ProtocolsMedia RecipesTechnical Table


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
# C_2009018EN.01000501.xml

| 24.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 18/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 18/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5435 — Nexans/SEI/Opticable)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 18/03)

On 16 January 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5435. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5435. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation Nos. 701-TA-469 and 731-TA-1168 (Second Review)]

## Determinations

                    On the basis of the record [1]                                          developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (“Commission”) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (“the Act”), that revocation of the countervailing and antidumping duty orders on certain seamless carbon and alloy steel standard, line, and pressure pipe from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.                

## Background

The Commission instituted these reviews on February 1, 2021 (86 FR 7740) and determined on May 7, 2021 that it would conduct expedited reviews (86 FR 36771, July 13, 2021).

                    The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determinations in these reviews on September 1, 2021. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5229 (September 2021), entitled                     *Certain Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe from China: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-469 and 731-TA-1168 (Second Review).*

By order of the Commission.

Issued: September 1, 2021.

Lisa Barton,

Secretary to the Commission.

# Footnotes

1.                             The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2021-19310 Filed 9-7-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-40419 

Conference Calendar

 

CECIL P. SAPP; DENISE STOCKTON,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

ADELAIDO FLORES, JR.; CAMERON COUNTY COMMISSIONERS’ COURT;

CAMERON COUNTY, TEXAS; CAMERON COUNTY,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-00-CV-137

--------------------

October 26, 2001

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Cecil P. Sapp and Denise Stockton appeal the district

court’s dismissal of their civil action for lack of subjectmatter jurisdiction. They argue that the district court abused

its discretion in denying their motion for an extension of time

to respond to the defendants’ motion to dismiss and in denying

the motion for reconsideration of this denial. We have reviewed

the record and hold that the district court did not abuse its

discretion in denying these motions.
No. 01-40419

-2-

** Rooker v. Fid. Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413, 415 (1923);

Dist. of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 476,

482 (1983).

“The Rooker-Feldman** doctrine holds that federal district

courts lack jurisdiction to entertain collateral attacks on state

judgments.” United States v. Shepherd, 23 F.3d 923, 924 (5th

Cir. 1994) (footnote omitted). If the district court must

examine issues that are “inextricably intertwined with a state

judgment, the [district] court is in essence being called upon to

review the state-court decision, and the originality of the

district court’s jurisdiction precludes such a review.” Id.

(internal quotations omitted). 

All of Sapp’s and Stockton’s claims of constitutional

violations are based on their allegation that the state-court

transcript was fabricated. The state trial court has already

determined that the transcript was accurate. Thus, the claims

presented to the district court were inextricably intertwined

with the state court’s judgment, and the district court was being

called on to review the state court’s decision regarding the

accuracy of the transcript. The district court therefore lacked

subject-matter jurisdiction to address the claims. See Shepherd,

23 F.3d at 924. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court

is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.
# C_2009301EN.01000401.xml

| 11.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5558 — Nutreco/Cargill)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 301/06

On 24 November 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5558. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5558. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT MARCH 31, 1997 AND THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          15,635
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   65,110<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     46,170
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               131,982
<PP&E>                                         419,373
<DEPRECIATION>                                 152,745
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 495,787
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           74,582
<BONDS>                                        205,458<F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,482
<OTHER-SE>                                     164,220
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   495,787
<SALES>                                        157,583
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               157,583
<CGS>                                          113,763
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  113,763
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,255
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,682
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,579
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,741
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,741
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.47
<FN>
<F1>(RECEIVABLES) ARE PRESENTED NET OF THE ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS.
<F2>(BONDS) REPRESENT LONG-TERM DEBT, LESS CURRENT MATURITIES, AND REVOLVING CREDIT
LOANS.
</FN>


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 24.1


                              DIRECTOR AND OFFICERS
                          OF NATIONAL PROCESSING, INC.
                       REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM 10-K

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

         The undersigned Directors of National Processing, Inc., an Ohio
corporation (the "Corporation"), which anticipates filing a Form 10-K annual
report pursuant to Section 13 of the Securities and Exchange Commission Act of
1934 for the Corporation's fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission hereby constitute and appoint David L.
Zoeller, Carlton E. Langer, David E. Fountain and Thomas A. Richlovsky, and each
of them, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, as attorneys or
attorney to sign for each of us and in our names, in the capacity indicated
below, said Form 10-K, and any and all amendments and exhibits thereto, or other
documents to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pertaining
thereto, with full power and authority to do and perform any and all acts and
things whatsoever required and necessary to be done in the premises, as fully to
all intents and purposes as I could do if personally present, hereby ratifying
and approving the acts of said attorneys, and any of them, and any such
substitute.

         EXECUTED this 15th day of February, 2002.


 /s/ Paul G. Clark                          Chairman and Director
-----------------------------------
Paul G. Clark


------------------------------------        Director
Aureliano Gonzalez-Baz


 /s/ Jeffrey P. Gotschall                   Director
-----------------------------------
Jeffrey P. Gotschall


 /s/ Jon. L. Gorney                         Director
-----------------------------------
Jon L.Gorney


 /s/ Preston B. Heller                      Director
-----------------------------------
Preston B. Heller


 /s/ Jeffrey D. Kelly                       Director
-----------------------------------
Jeffrey D. Kelly



<PAGE>



 /s/ J. Armando Ramirez                     Director
-----------------------------------
J. Armando Ramirez


 /s/ Robert G. Siefers                      Director
-----------------------------------
Robert G. Siefers


-----------------------------------         President, Chief Executive Officer
Thomas A. Wimsett                           and Director
#### BALL, Respondent, v. TIBBITS, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

September 22, 1896.)

Action by Clinton M. Ball against John B. Tibbits.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur.