alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2009172EN.01003401.xml

| 2.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 172/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 172/34

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 30 June 2009

appointing a new member of the Commission of the European Communities

(2009/507/EC, Euratom)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular the second paragraph of Article 215 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular the second paragraph of Article 128 thereof,

Whereas:

In a letter dated 25 June 2009, Ms Dalia GRYBAUSKAITĖ resigned from her post as a member of the Commission. She should be replaced for the remainder of her term of office,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Algirdas Gediminas ŠEMETA is hereby appointed a member of the Commission for the period from 1 July 2009 to 31 October 2009.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on 1 July 2009.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 June 2009.

For the Council

The President

J. KOHOUT

---
#### In the Matter of HERMAN M. BELL, Jr., an attorney at law.

For the order: *Mr. William 8. Zinlc.*

March 6, 1961.

Respondent suspended until the further order of the court.
# C_2009071EN.01001501.xml

| 25.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/15

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5470 — Gilde/Plukon)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 71/04)

On 17 March 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5470. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5470. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
Glen Canyon Dam Technical Work Group Meeting January 20, 2011 

 List of Attachments 

No. Attachment Presenter / Author 1 Action Item Tracking Report Shane Capron 

2a PowerPoint Presentations from Day 1 of Annual Report Meeting  Shane Capron 

2b PowerPoint Presentations from Day 2 of Annual Reporting Meeting  

3a Briefing Memorandum, Subject: Summary of upcoming USGS circular on the results of three high-flow experiments released from Glen Canyon Dam, Arizona 

   Ted Melis 3b 

Circular 1366: Effects of Three High-Flow Experiments on the Colorado River Ecosystem Downstream from Glen Canyon Dam, Arizona 

3c USGS Fact Sheet: Three Experimental High-Flow Releases from Glen Canyon Dam, Arizona—Effects on Downstream Colorado River Ecosystem 

3d Fact Sheet: The Effects of Glen Canyon Dam Operations on Early Life Stages of Rainbow Trout in the Colorado River 

4a Bureau of Reclamation Updates PPT Glen Knowles 4b Sam’s Questions – 1) Timing/Magnitude of Paria & LCR Floods?, and Sam’s 

questions – 2) Timing/Magnitude of Pre-Dam Colorado River Floods? PPT slide  Ted Melis Paul Grams 4c Open File Report 2011-2012, “Non-Native Fish Control below Glen Canyon 

Dam—Report from a Structured Decision-Making Project 5a Biennial Budget Process Paper 

Shane Capron 5b Budget Concerns developed by Shane Capron 5c FY11-12 Budget Assessment PPT John Hamill 6a Monitoring Plan: Final Steps PPT  

Helen Fairley 6b Chapter 1.  Introduction to the Core Monitoring Plan 6c 3.3.4 Core Monitoring Program Costs 7a Tables 1 and 2  

Helen Fairley 7b Final Revision Accomplished PPT 7c Table3 Revisions 

 OTHER DOCUMENTS PROVIDED AT MEETING:  13 Incorporating thermal regimes into environmental flows assessments: modifying dam operations to 

restore freshwater ecosystem integrity by Julian D. Olden and Robert J. Naiman  (University of Washington, Seattle) 

14 Causal Criteria Methods Manual – Methods for applying the multiple lines and levels of evidence (MLLE) approach for addressing questions of causality (University of Canberra)
# C_2006135EN.01000801.xml

| 9.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 135/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 135/8

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(2006/C 135/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

Date of adoption of the decision:

Member State: Italy — Piedmont Region

Aid Number: N 296/2004

Title: Demonstration programme on energy saving and renewable energy sources

Objective: The scheme is intended to stimulate the diffusion in the region of environmental projects, contributing to a significant reduction of CO2 emissions and to energy saving

2

Legal basis: Deliberazione della Giunta regionale della Regione Piemonte 5 luglio 2004, n. 23-12920, basata sulla legge regionale 7 ottobre 2002, n. 23

Budget: EUR 23 million (EUR 4 million for the first year)

Intensity: 40 % of eligible costs, 10 % intensity increase foreseen for SMEs

Duration: 3 years

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/index.htm

Date of adoption of the decision:

Member State: United Kingdom (Northern Ireland)

Aid No: N 631/2005

Title: Climate Change Levy exemption for natural gas in Northern Ireland

Objective: Prolongation of the exemption from Climate Change Levy for natural gas in Northern Ireland

Legal basis: Finance Act 2000

Budget: GBP 3-5 million/year

Duration: 5 years from 1 April 2006 to 31 March 2011

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/index.htm

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          13,732
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,563
<ALLOWANCES>                                    17,942
<INVENTORY>                                      6,387
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                91,847
<PP&E>                                           5,952
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,833
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 114,947
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           54,610
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           146
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,331
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   114,947
<SALES>                                         48,414
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               141,570
<CGS>                                           29,533
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   95,334
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                69,142
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,937
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,050
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (22,655)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (11,371)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,284)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,284)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.70)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.70)
<FN>
<F1>EPS has been restated for impact of SFAS No. 128, Earnings per share.
</FN>


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-27-1998
<CASH>                                         873,341
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  173,507
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    427,178
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,570,771
<PP&E>                                       1,042,525
<DEPRECIATION>                                (169,392)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,013,051
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          535,648
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,500
<COMMON>                                        21,750
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,453,153
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,013,051
<SALES>                                      8,848,337
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,848,337
<CGS>                                        5,784,634
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,784,634
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,241,322
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 309
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,101,444)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (429,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (672,444)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.31)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

            CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                          OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, the undersigned Jack (J.D.) Draper, President and Chief Executive
Officer of FIRSTPLUS Financial Group, Inc. (the "Company"), do hereby certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that:

         1.   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter
ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  October 21, 2005                   /s/ Jack (J.D.) Draper
                                           -----------------------------------
                                           Jack (J.D.) Draper
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           Principal Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Financial Statements of National Surgery Centers for the six months ended June
30, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                     12,730,000 
<SECURITIES>                               25,029,000 
<RECEIVABLES>                              18,563,000 
<ALLOWANCES>                                2,774,000 
<INVENTORY>                                 3,130,000 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           58,546,000       
<PP&E>                                     49,132,000      
<DEPRECIATION>                             13,303,000    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            151,144,000      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       9,369,000    
<BONDS>                                     8,651,000  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                         0 
<COMMON>                                      121,000 
<OTHER-SE>                                124,424,000       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              151,144,000         
<SALES>                                    46,362,000          
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           46,362,000          
<CGS>                                      34,622,000          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              34,622,000          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            2,027,000       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            346,000       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             9,367,000       
<INCOME-TAX>                                3,489,000      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         5,878,000      
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0      
<CHANGES>                                           0  
<NET-INCOME>                                5,878,000 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .47 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .47 
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Israel Sexton, Petitioner, v Raymond W Kelly et al., Respondents.

[943 NYS2d 516]—

Determination of respondent Raymond W. Kelly, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, dated March 25, 2009, approving the finding, after a hearing, that petitioner was guilty of failing to notify the Police Commissioner and/or the Legal Bureau of respondent Police Department that he intended to provide character testimony, and did in fact provide testimony, at a trial, and imposing a forfeiture penalty of 15 vacation days, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Joan A. Madden, J.], entered November 9, 2010), dismissed, without costs.

Regardless of whether the proceeding was properly transferred pursuant to CPLR 7804 (g), this Court retains jurisdiction in the interest of judicial economy *(see e.g. Matter of Whyte v Horn,*38 AD3d 362 [2007]).

The Commissioner’s determination — that, pursuant to the Police Department’s Patrol Guide Procedure No. 211-09, petitioner was required to give notice of his intention to testify at *his*cousin’s criminal trial, and that he failed to do so — was rational and supported by substantial evidence *(see 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights,*45 NY2d 176 [1978]; *see also Matter of Howard v Wyman,*28 NY2d 434, 438 [1971]). The Assistant Deputy Commissioner of Trials had a rational basis for finding that petitioner testified in his “official” capacity at the criminal trial, given that he referred to his job as a Police Department Sergeant and the judge in the case referred to him as “Sergeant.” The Assistant Deputy Commissioner also had a rational basis for finding that, even if petitioner did not testify in his “official capacity,” Patrol Guide Procedure No. 211-09 still applied because petitioner conceded that it was his understanding that he was going to provide character testimony, among other things.

We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Mazzarelli J.P., Saxe, Moskowitz, Renwick and Freedman, JJ.
#### Joseph DeVico, Appellant, v Roman Catholic Diocese of Rockville Centre et al., Respondents.

*778The plaintiff’s cause of action to recover damages for abusive discharge from employment was properly dismissed as no such action is recognized in New York *(see, Murphy v American Home Prods. Corp.,*58 NY2d 293). The plaintiff’s cause of action for breach of an employment contract must also fall. While such an action may be maintained, under certain circumstances, where employment is not for a fixed term, the plaintiff has failed to allege facts sufficient to establish the existence of such a contract *(see, O’Donnell v Westchester Community Serv. Council,*96 AD2d 885). Here, the plaintiff has not pleaded or produced any facts to rebut the presumption of the long-established New York rule that when a hiring is for an indefinite term, it is an employment at will which may be terminated by either party for any reason or even for no reason at all *(see, Murphy v American Home Prods. Corp.,*58 NY2d 293, *supra; Weiner v McGraw-Hill, Inc.,*57 NY2d 458; *O’Donnell v Westchester Community Serv. Council,*96 AD2d 885, *supra).*

The plaintiff’s claim that he attained tenure by acquiescence is without merit in view of the fact that the rules contained in the teachers’ handbook of the defendant Roman Catholic Diocese of Rockville Centre provided for tenure by acquiescence only if the teacher had a Bachelor’s degree and provisional State certification. The plaintiff possesses neither of those qualifications.

We have examined the plaintiff’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Mollen, P. J., Brown, Niehoff and Kooper, JJ., concur.
Order filed July 19, 2018. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-18-00360-CV

____________

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

V.

APPROXIMATELY $110,540.00, Appellee

On Appeal from the 281st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2017-09348

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due July 6, 2018. No brief or motion for extension of 

time has been filed. 

Unless appellant files a brief with this court on or before August 20, 2018, 

the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code)
  (a)
    
    the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended
December 31, 2004 (the Report) of the Company fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
 December
5, 2005
    
    /s/ Dean J. DouglasDean J. DouglasPresident and Chief Executive Officer
abmd-ex1017_561.htm



Exhibit 10.17

 

 April 27, 2020

By Email

Paul G. Thomas, Chairman of the Compensation Committee

Board of Directors of Abiomed, Inc.

C/O of: Marc Began, Secretary

22 Cherry Hill Drive 

Danvers, Ma 01923


Re:Temporary Salary Reduction

To the Board of Directors of Abiomed, Inc.:

In light of the disruption and uncertainty created by the evolving COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on the operations of Abiomed, Inc. (the “Company”), I hereby volunteer to forego my entire annual cash base salary payable between April 30, 2020 and June 30, 2020, other than any payments necessary for me to retain my Company-sponsored health and welfare benefits. 

 

 

Sincerely,

 


	
/S/ MICHAEL R. MINOGUE
	
	
Michael R. Minogue

	
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
# L_2009353DE.01007002.xml

| 31.12.2009 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 353/70 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.12.2009

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 353/70

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 131/2009 der Kommission vom 13. Februar 2009 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 105/2008 mit Durchführungsvorschriften zur Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1255/1999 des Rates hinsichtlich der Interventionen auf dem Markt für Butter

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 44 vom 14. Februar 2009
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 44 vom 14. Februar 2009

Seite 5, Artikel 1 Absatz 3 Buchstabe a:

anstatt:

| „(a) | Absatz 1 erhält folgende Fassung:
  1.   Nach Überprüfung des Angebots stellt die zuständige Stelle innerhalb von fünf Arbeitstagen nach Eingang des Angebots einen Lieferberechtigungsschein aus, sofern die Kommission keine besonderen Maßnahmen in Übereinstimmung mit Artikel 12 Absatz 2 erlässt.“ |
| --- | --- |

„(a)

Absatz 1 erhält folgende Fassung:

1.   Nach Überprüfung des Angebots stellt die zuständige Stelle innerhalb von fünf Arbeitstagen nach Eingang des Angebots einen Lieferberechtigungsschein aus, sofern die Kommission keine besonderen Maßnahmen in Übereinstimmung mit Artikel 12 Absatz 2 erlässt.“

muss es heißen:

| „a) | Absatz 1 erhält folgende Fassung:
  (1)   Nach Überprüfung des Angebots stellt die zuständige Stelle am fünften Arbeitstag nach Eingang des Angebots einen Lieferberechtigungsschein aus, sofern die Kommission keine besonderen Maßnahmen in Übereinstimmung mit Artikel 12 Absatz 2 erlässt.“ |
| --- | --- |

„a)

Absatz 1 erhält folgende Fassung:

(1)   Nach Überprüfung des Angebots stellt die zuständige Stelle am fünften Arbeitstag nach Eingang des Angebots einen Lieferberechtigungsschein aus, sofern die Kommission keine besonderen Maßnahmen in Übereinstimmung mit Artikel 12 Absatz 2 erlässt.“

---
**BF** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19 - 0149 STATE OF MONTANA ,

Plaintiff and Appellee , v. JOHN JAYCOB FISHBAUGH ,

Defendant and Appellant .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 3 0 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including January 6, 2021 , within whic h to prepare, serve, and file its response brief

.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 25 2020

11/25/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0149