alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. Department of the Interior

U.S. Geological Survey

The Natal Origins of Rainbow 

The Natal Origins of Rainbow 

Grand Canyon: Grand Canyon:

A Lines of Evidence Rev

A Lines of Evidence Rev

L.G. Coggins, Jr. and M.E. AndersenSouthwest Biological Science CenterGrand Canyon Monitoring and Research 
Why investigate natal origin

 Supports management efforts

 Recreational fishery in Lees Ferry re Native fishes conservation

 Supports work plan prioritization
Available lines of evidence

 Mechanical removal project data Spawning habitat availability Geographic distribution patterns Length-frequency distribution pat Correlated temporal patterns
Mechanical Removal Projec

MechanicaRemoval Reach

Control Reach
RBT immigration following 
RBT immigration following 
Spawning Habitat Availability 1
Spawning Habitat Availabili

 Korman et al. 2005 estimated Nan

Creek had capacity for 2000 spawrainbow trout in 2004

 Observed: 12 adults, 2 redds, 0 Y
Mainstem Spawning Habitat Av

2004

Korman et al. 2005
Geographic Distribution Patter

Speas et a
Geographic Distribution Patter
Geographic Distribution Patter

Speas et a
Geographic Distribution Patter
Length Frequency Distribut

RM -15 to RM -10

Total Length(mm)

Frequency

0 200 400 600

0 500 1000 1500 n= 17033

RM -10 to RM 0

Total Length(mm)

Frequency

0 200 400 600

0 500 1000 2000 3000 n= 31798

RM 0 to RM 10

Total Length(mm)

Frequency

0 200 400 60

0 50 100 150 n= 1364

RM 20 to RM 30

Total Length(mm)

Frequency

0 200 400 600

0 20 40 60 80 100 120n= 950

RM 30 to RM 40

Total Length(mm)

Frequency

0 200 400 600

0 100 200 300 400 n= 2365

RM 40 to RM 50

Total Length(mm)

Frequency

0 200 400 60

0 500 1000 1500 n= 647
Length Frequency Distribut

 Possible factors leading 

to observed distributions (Korman et al. 2005):

 Survival o

Marble Catimes greGlen Cany

 Juvenile p

Marble Cathan in Gl

 Second p

more plau
Correlated Temporal Pattern

Rainbow Trout Electrofishing C

Year

CPUE (Fish/Hour)

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

0 100 200 300 400

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

0 100 200 300 400 Lees Ferry Marble Canyon Little Colorado River Inflow 
Conclusion and Recommen

 Conclusion: Most likely that majo

rainbow trout in Colorado River in Marble, and Grand Canyons is prGlen Canyon/Lees Ferry reach

 Recommendation: Do not pursue 

research into natal origin of rainbthis time
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tyrone McInnis, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Aiello, J.), imposed June 6, 1984.

Ordered that the sentence is reversed, on the law, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for resentencing in accordance herewith.

The defendant pleaded guilty to attempted manslaughter in the first degree upon a promise by the court that he would receive a maximum sentence of *llá*to *AVi*years. The question of youthful offender adjudication was not raised and not made a part of the plea bargain.

On the date of sentence, the court, *sua sponte,*raised the issue of the defendant’s eligibility for youthful offender status. However, as the People concede, the court erroneously consid*715ered attempted manslaughter in the first degree to be an armed felony offense (CPL 1.20 [41]). Therefore, the court improperly applied CPL 720.10 (3), which requires a finding of either mitigating circumstances or minimal involvement before a defendant convicted of an armed felony offense may be found to be an "eligible youth”.

Because it appears that the defendant was an "eligible youth” as a matter of law (CPL 720.10 [2]), the sentence must be vacated, and he must be considered for youthful offender treatment and resentenced in accordance with the applicable statutory criteria (CPL 720.20). However, we express no view on whether the defendant should be adjudged a youthful offender. That determination rests, in the first instance, in the sound discretion of the trial court *(see, People v Parris,*109 AD2d 853). Mollen, P. J., Lazer, Bracken and Eiber, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

WILLIAM TARR, as Personal 3:15-CV-02243-PK 

Representative of the 

ESTATE OF CONNOR WILLIAM ORDER 

TARR,

Plaintiff,

 

v.

USF REDDAWAY, INC., an 

Oregon corporation; YRC 

WORLDWIDE, INC., a Delaware 

corporation; GERALD THOMAS

TRUELOVE, an individual,

 Defendants.

BROWN, Judge.

Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued Findings and

Recommendation (#31) on February 23, 2016, in which he recommends

this Court grant in part and deny in part Defendants’ Motion

(#16) to Dismiss; grant Plaintiff leave to amend his Complaint to

allege Plaintiff’s residency; dismiss without prejudice

Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant YRC Worldwide, Inc.; and

1 - ORDER

Case 3:15-cv-02243-PK Document 43 Filed 05/17/16 Page 1 of 3
deny as moot the Motion (#27) to Strike of Defendants YRC and USF

Reddaway, Inc. Plaintiff filed timely Objections to the Findings

and Recommendation (#45). The matter is now before this Court

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 72(b).

When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate

Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make

a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's

report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). See also Dawson v. Marshall, 561

F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328

F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc). 

This Court has carefully considered Plaintiff’s Objections

and concludes they do not provide a basis to modify the Findings

and Recommendation. The Court also has reviewed the pertinent

portions of the record de novo and does not find any error in the

Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation. 

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings and

Recommendation (#31). Accordingly, the Court DENIES as moot the

Motion (#27) to Strike of Defendants YRC and USF Reddaway and

GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants’ Motion (#16) to

Dismiss as follows:

(1) The Court DENIES as moot Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss

2 - ORDER

Case 3:15-cv-02243-PK Document 43 Filed 05/17/16 Page 2 of 3
to the extent they seek dismissal of Plaintiff’s claims

for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and

(2) The Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss

Plaintiff’s claims against YRC for lack of personal

jurisdiction and DISMISSES without prejudice

Plaintiff’s claims against YRC.

The Court GRANTS Plaintiff leave to file an Amended

Complaint to allege Plaintiff’s residency no later than June 1,

2016, consistent with Magistrate Judge Papak’s Findings and

Recommendation (#31) and this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 17th day of May, 2016.

/s/ Anna J. Brown

____________________________

ANNA J. BROWN

United States District Judge

3 - ORDER

Case 3:15-cv-02243-PK Document 43 Filed 05/17/16 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.

SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Intelligroup, Inc, (the Company) on Form
10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alok Bajpai, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and to the
best of my knowledge and belief, that:

|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d);) and    
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the Company.
|   

|DATE: March 19,
      2009 | By: /s/ |                              
|-------------------------- | ------- | -----------------------------
|                           |         | Alok
      Bajpai            
|                           |         | Chief
      Financial Officer

---
biol-ex1010_189.htm



Ex 10.10

 

 

 

Biolase, Inc.
4 Cromwell
Irvine, California 92618

April 12, 2020

John R. Beaver 

c/o Biolase, Inc.

4 Cromwell

Irvine, California 92618 

Re: Amendment to Employment Agreement 

Dear Mr. Beaver:

This letter agreement shall serve to amend that certain Employment Agreement, dated September 30, 2017 (the “Employment Agreement”), by and between Biolase, Inc. (the “Company”) and John R. Beaver. Capitalized terms used herein by not defined shall have those means ascribed to them in the Employment Agreement. 

 

Effective as of April 12, 2020, the parties hereby agree as follows:

 

1.In light of Executive’s voluntary offer to reduce his base salary by forty percent (40.0%), in connection with the Company’s COVID-19 cost reduction measures, Section 3 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended such that the provision that Executive be paid “at the annual rate of not less than $325,000.00 per annum” shall read “at the annual rate of not less than $195,000.00 per annum” for a temporary period of time running from the date hereof, through the date that management presents, and the Company’s Board of Directors approves, the return-to-work plan wherein the Company’s furlough is fully lifted. In addition, the Company agrees to make every effort during the 2020 fiscal year, to the extent possible depending on the financial condition and performance of the Company, to keep Executive whole in connection with the Employment Agreement as it existed prior to the Amendment. 

 

This letter agreement amends certain terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement. All other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement that are not modified by this letter agreement are hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects, and shall remain in full force and effect. Should there be any conflict between the terms and conditions contained in this letter agreement and the Employment Agreement, the terms and conditions of this letter agreement shall govern and control.

 



Ex 10.10

 

 

 

Please acknowledge your agreement to the foregoing terms and conditions by countersigning this letter agreement in the space provided below.

Very truly yours,

BIOLASE, INC.

 

By: /s/ Jonathan T. Lord

Name: Jonathan T. Lord

Chair: Chairman of the Board of Directors

 

 

ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:

 

 

 

John R. Beaver

John R. Beaver
# C_2009139EN.01000101.xml

| 19.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5524 — METEO-FRANCE/CDC/NYSE EURONEXT/METNEXT)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 139/01

On 9 June 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5524. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5524. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Exhibit 10.18


 


FIRST AMENDMENT



TO


EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT


 


This
First Amendment to Employment Agreement (the “First Amendment”) is made and effective as of May 12, 2020, between
Modular Medical, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and Paul M. DiPerna (“Executive”) (each a “Party”
and collectively the “Parties”).


 


WHEREAS,
the Parties entered into an Employment Agreement effective as of August 1, 2018, setting forth the terms and conditions of Executive’s
employment as Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer (the “Employment Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS,
the Parties to desire to amend the Employment Agreement as set forth in this First Amendment.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants herein contained, the receipt and sufficiency of which the Parties
hereby acknowledge, the Parties agree as follows:


 


1.       The
Employment Agreement is hereby amended as follows:


 




Section
6 Change of Control is hereby amended by deleting existing subsection (b) Payment to Executives and inserting the following
new subsections (b) and (c):


 


		(b)	Payment to Executive.
In the event of a Change of Control, within sixty (60) days of the date the Change of Control occurs, Executive shall be paid
by the Company or its successor in interest a lump sum cash payment equal to 12 months of Executive’s then annual Base Compensation.



 


		(c)	Acceleration of Unvested
Awards. In the event of a Change of Control, immediately prior to such Change of Control the vesting of any unvested stock
options or other unvested securities of Company issued to Executive pursuant to this Agreement shall automatically accelerate
and immediately become fully vested and exercisable.



 


2.       Except as modified by this First Amendment, the terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement remain in full force and effect.


 


3.       This First Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which
shall constitute one and the same instrument.


 


4.       This First Amendment has been approved by action of the Company’s Board of Directors on May 12, 2020.


 





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly
executed this First Amendment as of the date first above written.





	 	 	 	 
	EXECUTIVE	 	COMPANY
	 	 	 	 
		 	By: 	               
	Paul M. DiPerna	 	 	William J. Febbo

    Chairman of the Compensation 

    Committee of the Board of Directors
nclc_Ex10_2



		

			 

		





		
			Exhibit 10.2
		

		
			 
		

		
			[______________], 2020
		

		
			 
		

		
			Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.
		

		
			7665 Corporate Center Drive
		

		
			Miami, FL 33126
		

		
			Attn: [FULL NAME]
		

		
			 
		

		
			Re:  Temporary Reduction in Base Salary
		

		
			 
		

		
			Dear [FIRST NAME]:
		

		
			 
		

		
			You are party to an employment agreement (the “Employment Agreement”) with Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. or one of its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”).  
		

		
			 
		

		
			Due to current circumstances, you agree that until such time as the Company determines, your current base salary will be reduced by twenty percent  (20%) (the “Salary Reduction”).  You agree that the Salary Reduction will not constitute Good Reason as defined in the Employment Agreement.
		

		
			 
		

		
			The Salary Reduction will not reduce the amounts of the severance benefit and change in control severance benefit to which you are currently entitled under the Employment Agreement upon a qualifying termination.    Except for the Salary Reduction, all of the other terms of the Employment Agreement will remain in full force and effect.    
		

		
			 
		

		
			This letter agreement may be executed by you and the Company in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which shall constitute one and the same agreement.  Please sign where indicated below to acknowledge and agree to the terms of this letter agreement. 
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			NORWEGIAN CRUISE LINE HOLDINGS LTD.
		

		
			
		

		
			By:_________________________________
		

		
			     Name: _________________
		

		
			     Title:   _________________
		

		
			
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			ACCEPTED AND AGREED:
		

		
			 
		

		
			________________________
		

		
			[FULL NAME]
Case 3:16-mj-00014 Document 1-1 Filed 02/11/16 Page 1 of 1
# L_2010114DE.01001601.xml

| 7.5.2010 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 114/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2010

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 114/16

---

Berichtigung der Richtlinie 2009/36/EG der Kommission vom 16. April 2009 zur Änderung der Richtlinie 76/768/EWG des Rates über kosmetische Mittel zwecks Anpassung ihres Anhangs III an den technischen Fortschritt

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 98 vom 17. April 2009
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 98 vom 17. April 2009

Seite 33, Anhang Abschnitt 1 laufende Nummer 190:

anstatt:

„Acid Yellow 9 Aluminium lake“

muss es heißen:

„Acid Blue 9 Aluminium lake“.

Seite 34, Anhang Abschnitt 1 laufende Nummer 192:

anstatt:

„Acid Yellow 18 Aluminium lake“

muss es heißen:

„Acid Red 18 Aluminium lake“.

Seite 36, Anhang Abschnitt 1 laufende Nummer 202:

anstatt:

„2 1,3-Bis-(2,4-diaminophenoxy)propan“

muss es heißen:

„1,3-Bis-(2,4-diaminophenoxy)propan“.

---
<PAGE>
Exhibit 99.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002,
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alkermes Clinical Partners,
L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Richard F. Pops, President and Chief Executive Officer of Alkermes
Development Corporation II, General Partner of the Partnership, certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 that:

     1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Partnership.

                                              /s/ Richard F. Pops
                                              Richard F. Pops,
                                              President and Chief Executive
                                              Officer of Alkermes Development
                                              Corporation II, General Partner of
                                              Alkermes Clinical Partners, L.P.
                                              August 14, 2002
Status and Trends Up

•

Technical Work Group Novemb

–

Downstream trout sampling

• 2001 vs. 2002 Preliminary results 

–

Lees Ferry monitoring 2002 updat

•

Poor 2001 year-class
Downstream RBT CPUE 200

R

ainbow

0

500

100015002000

0

5

0 100 150 

Ri

v

e

r Mile

CPUE fish/10hr 
Downstream BNT CPUE 200

Bro

w

n

0

100200300400500600700

0

5

0 100 150 

Ri

v

e

r Mile

CPUE fish/10hr
2001 vs. 2002 downst

•

Rainbow trout / Brown trout

–

Small apparent decrease in CPUE 

–

May be explained by differing catc

percent of the actual population caunit effort).

•

Catchability is higher in slightly turb

– 2001 sampling was done in turbid water–

Feb-Mar 2002 sampling was done in cle

–

Waiting for remainder of 2002 data (GC
Lees Ferry CPUE

A

n

n

ual A

ngler C

a

t

c

h

/

hour (

1

a

nd Ele

c

t

rofishing C

a

t

ch/

minut

e 

0

0.

2

0.

4

0.

6

0.

81

1.

2

1.

4

1.

6

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

Ye

ar

Angler catch/hour

O

b

s

erved Angler C

atc

h

Per H

o

ur

Electrofishing C

atch P

er

Min

ute
Lees Ferry ES CPUE 1991-

Mean Catch per minute and 95% Confidence I

nterval, Lees F

erry Elec

M

arch 2002 (

Coffelt Boat onl

y).

0.

0

1.

0

2.

0

3.

0

4.

0

5.

0

6.

0

1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 19

Year

Catch per Minute
Creel CPUE 2000-Feb 20
LF CPE Age-0 RBT O

N = 15 15

5 15 15 15

9

9 12

SET

_

Y

R

20

1999

1998

1997

1996

1995

1994

1993

1992

1991

CPE RBT <= 152 mm (#/min)

543210

-1
LF % Age-0 RBT Oct

N = 15 15

5 15 15 15

9

9 12

SET

_

YR

1999

1998

1997

1996

1995

1994

1993

1992

1991

95% CI PERCENT RBT <= 152 mm

100

80604020

0
June 2002 Length Frequ

LE

N

G

T

H

410.0

390.0

370.0

350.0

330.0

310.0

290.0

270.0

250.0

230.0

210.0

190.0

170.0

150.0

130.0

110.0

90.0

70.0

50.0

Len

g

t

h Freq J

u

n 2002 R

BT Lees Fe

70605040302010

0
Oct 2002 Length Frequ

LE

N

G

T

H

4

440.0

420.0

400.0

380.0

360.0

340.0

320.0

300.0

280.0

260.0

240.0

220.0

200.0

180.0

160.0

140.0

120.0

100.0

80.0

60.0

40.0

Len

g

t

h F

req O

c

t 2002 R

B

T Lees F

e

80604020

0
Concerns:

Large 2000 cohort trying to mature; (strandinFish <152 mm during later 3 months of the yRepresents all fish produced over the previouA few age 1 fish) assuming growth of 10-15 Most yoy are 80 mm, comprise < 7% of the c
Concerns:

• Apparent loss of year class in 20

Ferry, not due to flow variables?

– Possibly due to loss of adult spawn

or poor energetic condition of adu

• How can we separate this change 

changes caused by experimental 

– In a two year experiment?
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.4

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Communications & Power Industries,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 4, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Joel Littman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Joel Littman


Joel Littman
Chief Financial Officer
August 8, 2003