alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.2


 



	Company	 	Loan Date	 	PPP Loan Received	 	 	PPP Loan Returned	 	 	Net PPP Loan	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Energy Services of America Corporation	 	April 11, 2020	 	$	66,100	 	 	$	26,100	 	 	$	40,000	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	CJ Hughes Construction Company Inc.	 	April 7, 2020	 	 	3,255,600	 	 	 	911,700	 	 	 	2,343,900	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Contractors Rental Corporation	 	April 7, 2020	 	 	3,455,200	 	 	 	-	 	 	 	3,455,200	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Nitro Construction Services, Inc.	 	April 7, 2020	 	 	6,362,200	 	 	 	2,362,200	 	 	 	4,000,000	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Total	 	 	 	$	13,139,100	 	 	$	3,300,000	 	 	$	9,839,100
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1670 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1670

 To direct the Architect of the Capitol to place in the United States 
 Capitol a chair honoring American Prisoners of War/Missing in Action.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 26, 2015

Mr. Lynch (for himself, Mr. Benishek, Mr. Bishop of Utah, Ms. Bordallo, 
Mr. Cartwright, Ms. Clark of Massachusetts, Mr. Deutch, Mr. Jolly, Mr. 
 Jones, Mr. Keating, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. King of New York, Mr. Lance, Mr. 
McGovern, Mr. Peterson, Mr. Rangel, Mr. Rice of South Carolina, Mr. Roe 
of Tennessee, and Ms. Tsongas) introduced the following bill; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Architect of the Capitol to place in the United States 
 Capitol a chair honoring American Prisoners of War/Missing in Action.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National POW/MIA Remembrance Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds the following:
            (1) In recent years, commemorative chairs honoring American 
        Prisoners of War/Missing in Action have been placed in 
        prominent locations across the United States.
            (2) The United States Capitol is an appropriate location to 
        place a commemorative chair honoring American Prisoners of War/
        Missing in Action.

SEC. 3. PLACEMENT OF A CHAIR IN UNITED STATES CAPITOL HONORING AMERICAN 
              PRISONERS OF WAR/MISSING IN ACTION.

    (a) Obtaining Chair.--The Architect of the Capitol shall enter into 
an agreement to obtain a chair featuring the logo of the National 
League of POW/MIA Families under such terms and conditions as the 
Architect considers appropriate and consistent with applicable law.
    (b) Placement.--Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Architect shall place the chair obtained under 
subsection (a) in a suitable permanent location in the United States 
Capitol.

SEC. 4. FUNDING.

    (a) Donations.--The Architect of the Capitol may--
            (1) enter into an agreement with any organization described 
        in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 that 
        is exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of that Code to 
        solicit private donations to carry out the purposes of this 
        Act; and
            (2) accept donations of funds, property, and services to 
        carry out the purposes of this Act.
    (b) Costs.--All costs incurred in carrying out the purposes of this 
Act shall be paid for with private donations received under subsection 
(a).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit (10)(a)

    

    

    

    

    

    

    Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    

    

    

    

    We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in
      Post-Effective Amendment No. 78 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-40937) and Amendment No. 766 to the 1940 Act Registration
      Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08517), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 13, 2020, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 15, 2020, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln National Variable Annuity
      Account N for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    May 15, 2020
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40387 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE ORLANDO GUEVARA-SOSA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:04-CR-1505-ALL

-------------------- Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jose Orlando Guevara-Sosa appeals his conviction for illegal reentry. His constitutional challenge to 8 U.S.C. § 1326 is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Although Guevara-Sosa contends that AlmendarezTorres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding.No. 05-40387 -2- See United States v. Garza-Lopez , 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Guevara-Sosa properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review. AFFIRMED.
# L_2009098EN.01003801.xml

| 17.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 98/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 98/38

---

DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

of 11 March 2009

on mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund, in accordance with point 26 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management

(2009/326/EC)

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (1), and in particular point 26 thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 of 11 November 2002 establishing the European Union Solidarity Fund (2), and in particular Article 4(3) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | The European Union has created a European Union Solidarity Fund (the Fund) to show solidarity with the population of regions struck by disasters. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The European Union has created a European Union Solidarity Fund (the Fund) to show solidarity with the population of regions struck by disasters.

| (2) | The Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 allows the mobilisation of the Fund within the annual ceiling of EUR 1 billion. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 allows the mobilisation of the Fund within the annual ceiling of EUR 1 billion.

| (3) | Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 contains the provisions whereby the Fund may be mobilised. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 contains the provisions whereby the Fund may be mobilised.

| (4) | Romania submitted an application to mobilise the Fund, concerning a disaster caused by floods. The Commission considers that the application meets the conditions set out in Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002, and therefore proposes to authorise the corresponding appropriations, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Romania submitted an application to mobilise the Fund, concerning a disaster caused by floods. The Commission considers that the application meets the conditions set out in Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002, and therefore proposes to authorise the corresponding appropriations,

HAVE DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

In the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2009, the European Union Solidarity Fund shall be mobilised to provide the sum of EUR 11 785 377 in commitment and payment appropriations.

Article 2

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Strasbourg, 11 March 2009.

For the European Parliament

The President

H.-G. PÖTTERING

For the Council

The President

A. VONDRA

---

(1)  
  OJ C 139, 14.6.2006, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 311, 14.11.2002, p. 3.

2

---
#### State ex rel. Commission for Higher Education *v.*Wethersfield School of Law, Inc.

The plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the appeal filed March 14, 1975, from the Superior Court in Hart*665ford County is granted without prejudice to the defendant’s proceeding pursuant to § 689 of the rules of practice.

*F. Michael Ahern,*assistant attorney general, for the appellee (state).

*Wesley W. Horton,*for the appellant (defendant).

Argued May 6

decided May 6, 1975
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

JERAMEY ORTEGA, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

DENYSE GOLDADE, 

Defendant. 

AIKEN, Judge: 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

Case No. 6:15 CV 01598-SB 

ORDER 

Magistrate Judge Beckerman filed her Findings and Recommendation ("F&R") (doc. 53) 

on August 31, 2017. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. 

No objections have been timely filed. Although this relieves me of my obligation to perform a 

de novo review, I retain the obligation to "make an informed, final determination." Britt v. Simi 

Valley Unified Sch. Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983), overruled on other grounds, United 

States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121-22 (9th Cir. 2003) (en bane). The Magistrates Act 

does not specify a standard of review in cases where no objections are filed. Ray v. Astrue, 2012 

WL 1598239, *1 (D. Or. May 7, 2012). Following the recommendation of the Rules Advisory 

Committee, I review the F&R for "clear error on the face of the record[.]" Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 

Page 1 - OPINION AND ORDER 
advisory committee's note (1983) (citing Campbell v. United States District Court, 501 F.2d 

196, 206 (9th Cir. 1974)); see also United States v. Vann, 535 U.S. 55, 64 n.6 (2002) (stating 

that, "[i]n the absence of a clear legislative mandate, the Advisory Committee Notes provide a 

reliable source of insight into the meaning of' a federal rule). Having reviewed the file of this 

case, I find no clear error. 

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that I adopt Judge Beckerman's F&R (doc. 

53). 

-,r,,.L, ;,-.,J..?l('Y!/,.c1-

Dated this.JU day of~, 2017. 

Ann Aiken 

United States District Judge 

Page 2 - OPINION AND ORDER
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Charles H. KOSI, Jr., Defendant—Appellant.

No. 06-10423.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 16, 2007 *.

Filed April 20, 2007.

Darren W.K. Ching, Office of The U.S. Attorney, Honolulu, HI, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Mark R. Zenger, Esq., Richards *&*Zenger, Lihue, HI, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Charles H. Kosi, Jr., appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty-plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Although appellee contends Kosi waived his right to appeal, the appeal waiver in the plea agreement does not encompass the issues raised in this appeal. *See United States v. Jeronimo,*398 F.3d 1149, 1153 (9th Cir.2005).

Kosi contends the district court abused its discretion by denying his motion to withdraw the guilty plea. *See United States v. Ortega-Ascanio,*376 F.3d 879, 883 (9th Cir.2004). We find no such abuse, because the thorough plea colloquy demonstrates that the guilty plea was knowing and voluntary. *See*Fed.R.Crim.P. 11; *United States v. Vonn,*535 U.S. 55, 58, 122 S.Ct. 1043, 152 L.Ed.2d 90 (2002) (explaining that Rule 11 ensures that a guilty plea is knowing and voluntary). We decline to address Kosi’s challenge to the effectiveness of defense counsel on direct appeal. *777*See Jeronimo,*398 F.3d at 1155.1

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

1

. We express no opinion on how Kosi’s appeal waiver might affect any collateral attack of his conviction and sentence. *See Jeronimo,*398 F.3d at 1156 n. 4.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Manhattan, Kansas (NBAF)
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Manhattan, Kansas (NBAF) People & Locations







Keatron  Colbert
                        Manhattan, Kansas (NBAF)

                        




                        
                        Pipefitter
                        Phone: (785) 712-3146
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
# C_2009216EN.01000401.xml

| 10.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 216/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 216/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5606 — UNIQA/Veneto Banca/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 216/02

On 31 August 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5606. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5606. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# L_2009283EN.01006101.xml

| 30.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 283/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 283/61

---

COUNCIL JOINT ACTION 2009/795/CFSP

of 19 October 2009

repealing Joint Action 2007/677/CFSP on the European Union military operation in the Republic of Chad and in the Central African Republic

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 14 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 15 October 2007, the Council adopted Joint Action 2007/677/CFSP (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 15 October 2007, the Council adopted Joint Action 2007/677/CFSP (1).

| (2) | The EU military operation in the Republic of Chad and in the Central African Republic (Operation EUFOR Tchad/RCA) was launched on 28 January 2008 by Council Decision 2008/101/CFSP (2) and ended on 15 March 2009. Subsequently all forces have been redeployed from the area of operations. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The EU military operation in the Republic of Chad and in the Central African Republic (Operation EUFOR Tchad/RCA) was launched on 28 January 2008 by Council Decision 2008/101/CFSP (2) and ended on 15 March 2009. Subsequently all forces have been redeployed from the area of operations.

| (3) | By letter dated 7 July 2009 the EU Operation Commander notified the recovery of the EU force, and therefore Joint Action 2007/677/CFSP should be repealed, in accordance with Article 15(3) thereof. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

By letter dated 7 July 2009 the EU Operation Commander notified the recovery of the EU force, and therefore Joint Action 2007/677/CFSP should be repealed, in accordance with Article 15(3) thereof.

| (4) | Council Decision 2008/975/CFSP of 18 December 2008 establishing a mechanism to administer the financing of the common costs of European Union operations having military or defence implications (ATHENA) (3) determines the procedures for the audit and presentation of the accounts of an operation, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Council Decision 2008/975/CFSP of 18 December 2008 establishing a mechanism to administer the financing of the common costs of European Union operations having military or defence implications (ATHENA) (3) determines the procedures for the audit and presentation of the accounts of an operation,

HAS ADOPTED THIS JOINT ACTION:

Article 1

Joint Action 2007/677/CFSP is hereby repealed. This repeal shall be without prejudice to the procedures laid down in Decision 2008/975/CFSP regarding the audit and presentation of the accounts of the operation.

Article 2

This Joint Action shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Article 3

This Joint Action shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Luxembourg, 19 October 2009.

For the Council

The President

E. ERLANDSSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 279, 23.10.2007, p. 21.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 34, 8.2.2008, p. 39.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 345, 23.12.2008, p. 96.

3

---
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Livestock, Forage and Pasture Management Research Unit: El Reno, OK
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




Welcome to the Livestock, Forage and Pasture Management Research Unit!


Mission


People Angelopoulos, Katherine
                                            *- Kate* Boerman, Nicholas Bollinger, Kory Christensen, Teresa Cooper, William
                                            *- Bill* Coy, Cynthia
                                            *- Cindy* Croney, Emily Filipchuk, Michelle
                                            *- Mary* Fobes, William (neil)
                                            *- Neil* Friend, Emalee Harper, Dana Kastl, John Mittelstaedt, Craig Moffet, Corey Northup, Brian Palacios, Israel Parsons, Lonnie Russell, Patrick Schneider, Matthew Thelen, Tonya Wagle, Pradeep Weik, Jeffrey
                                            *- Jeff* Witt, Travis


Plains Area   corey.moffet@usda.gov


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Drew L. Johnson, P.C. 

sherwoodreese@comcast.net 

1700 Valley River Drive 

Eugene, OR 97401 

(541) 434-6466 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES COURT DISTRICT COURT 

CARMELO A. V ARO, 

Plaintiff, 

VS. 

Commissioner of Social Security 

Administration, 

Defendant. 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

Case No. 6:15-cv-02319-KI 

ORDER APPROVING 

ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO 42 

u.s.c. §406(b) 

After considering Plaintiffs Motion, and counsel for Defendant having no objection, 

Plaintiff's Motion is hereby granted in the sum of $15,643.00 as full settlement of all claims for 

attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §406(b). The net requested herein, less the EAJA fee 

awarded of $7,050.58, is $8,592.42, and Defendant shall pay this amount to Plaintiff's counsel, 

Drew L. Johnson, less an administrative assessment pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 406(d). There are no 

other costs. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this day of February 7, 2018. 

1 

ORDER APPROVING ATTORNEYS FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C §406 (b) -