alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2087 Referred in House (RFH)]

  2d Session
                                S. 2087

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 10, 1998

                 Referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to convey certain works, 
facilities, and titles of the Gila Project, and designated lands within 
 or adjacent to the Gila Project, to the Wellton-Mohawk Irrigation and 
               Drainage District, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE

    This Act may be referred to as the ``Wellton-Mohawk Transfer Act''.

SEC. 2. TRANSFER

    The Secretary of the Interior (``Secretary'') is authorized to 
carry out the terms of the Memorandum of Agreement No. 8-AA-34-WAO14 
(``Agreement'') dated July 10, 1998 between the Secretary and the 
Wellton-Mohawk Irrigation and Drainage District (``District'') 
providing for the transfer of works, facilities, and lands to the 
District, including conveyance of Acquired Lands, Public Lands, and 
Withdrawn Lands, as defined in the Agreement.

SEC. 3. WATER AND POWER CONTRACTS

    Notwithstanding the transfer, the Secretary and the Secretary of 
Energy shall provide for and deliver Colorado River water and Parker-
Davis Project Priority Use Power to the District in accordance with the 
terms of existing contracts with the District, including any amendments 
or supplements thereto or extensions thereof and as provided under 
section 2 of the Agreement.

SEC. 4. SAVINGS

    Nothing in this Act shall affect any obligations under the Colorado 
River Basin Salinity Control Act (Public Law 93-320, 43 U.S.C. 1571).

SEC. 5. REPORT

    If transfer of works, facilities, and lands pursuant to the 
Agreement has not occurred by July 1, 2000, the Secretary shall report 
on the status of the transfer as provided in section 5 of the 
Agreement.

SEC. 6. AUTHORIZATION

    There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be 
necessary to carry out the provisions of this Act.

            Passed the Senate October 9 (legislative day, October 2), 
      1998.

            Attest:

                                                    GARY SISCO,

                                                             Secretary.
```
LISA R. J. PORTER 

JP Law PC

5200 SW Meadows Rd., Suite 150 

Lake Oswego, OR 97035 

(503) 245-6309 

OSB NO. 025035

Attorney for Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

Andrew Stephen Beck, 

Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-01803-SI

vs. 

CAROLYN W. COLVIN ORDER GRANTING AWARD 

COMMISSIONER of Social Security, OF EAJA FEES, EXPENSES 

Defendant / COSTS

ORDER 

Based upon the Plaintiff’s Petition, the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 

2412(d)(1)(A) the assignment of EAJA fees to Plaintiff’s attorney by Plaintiff, as discussed in 

Astrue v Ratliff, 130 S. Ct. 2521U.S. (2010), and 28 U.S.C. § 1920 it is hereby ordered that 

EAJA attorney’s fees of $3,557.59 and expenses $6.16 and costs of $11.60, if not subject to any 

offset allowed under the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program as discussed in 

Ratliff shall be paid to the Plaintiff, and mailed to the attorney’s office. 

Done this ______day of ________________, 2016. 

__________________________________________ 

Presented by: 

s/Lisa R.J. Porter_____________- 

Lisa R.J. Porter, OSB 025035 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

5200 SW Meadows Rd., Suite 150 

Lake Oswego, OR 97035 

17th February

/s/ Michael H. Simon

 U.S. District Court Judge

Case 3:14-cv-01803-SI Document 24 Filed 02/17/16 Page 1 of 1
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 22

- 00499

- CV

Dyanne Stengel , Appellant

v. Cheryl Durant Barnes , Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF LLANO COUNTY NO. 03028 , THE HONORABLE RON CUNNINGHAM , JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
The clerk’s record in this appeal was due for filing in this Court on October 3, 2022. On October 11, 2022, we notified appellant that no clerk’s record had been filed due to her failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the trial clerk’ s fee for preparing the clerk’s record. The notice requested that appellant make arrangements for the clerk’s reco rd and submit a status report regarding this appeal by October 21, 2022. Further, the notice advised appellant that her failure to comply wi th this request could result in the dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution. To date, appellant has not fi led a status report or otherwise responded to this Court’s notice, and the clerk’s record has not been filed. If a trial

- court clerk fails to f ile the clerk’s record due to an appellant’s failure to pay or make arrangements to pay for the clerk’s fee for preparing the record, the appellate court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed2 without pa yment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). In this case, appellant has not established that she is entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145. Because appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee fo r preparing the clerk’s record, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

__________________________________________ Edward Smith , Justice
B efore Justices Baker, Kelly, and Smith Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: January 31, 2023
Exhibit
10.1


 


 






    	 



    	 



    

  


 






    	 



    	 



    

  


 






    	 



    	 



    

  


 






    	 



    	 



    

  


  


	BORROWER:	 
	 	 
	PECK ELECTRIC CO.	 
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Jeffrey Peck	 
	 	Jeffrey Peck, President of Peck Electric Co.	 





 






    	 



    	 



    




 


 





	LENDER:	 
	 	 
	NBT BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION	 
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Leo D. Cruickshank	 
	 	Authorized Signer	 






 


  






    	 



    	 



    

  


 






    	 



    	 



    

 


 


	 	BORROWER:
	 	 
	 	PECK ELECTRIC CO.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Jeffrey Peck
	 	 	Jeffrey Peck, President & CEO





 





	 	LENDER:
	 	 
	 	NBT BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Leo D. Cruickshank
	 	 	Leo D. Cruickshank, Vice President


 


[Signature Page to Addendum to Loan Documents.]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

RICHARD E. GURULE, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

JERI TAYLOR, et al., 

Defendants. 

Mcshane, District Judge. 

2:15-cv-2260-MC 

ORDER 

Plaintiff, an inmate in the custody of the Oregon 

Department of Corrections filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 

1983 alleging violations of his civil rights arising out of 

his medical care at the Eastern Oregon Correctional 

Institution. 

Plaintiff now moves for a temporary restraining order and 

preliminary injunction requiring plaintiff to be examined by 

medical specialists to "evaluate" his medical condition and 

"prescribe treatments." 

The general rules for granting preliminary relief are 

1 - ORDER 
familiar and need not be discussed in detail. "The purpose of 

a preliminary injunction is merely to preserve the relative 

positions of the parties until a trial on the merits can be 

held," and it is generally inappropriate for a federal court 

at the preliminary injunction stage to give a final judgment 

on the merits. University of Texas v. Camenisch, 451 U.S. 

391, 395 (1981); Tanner Motor Livery, Ltd. V. Avis, Inc, 316 

F.2d 804, 808 (9th Cir. 1983). See also, Regents of 

University of California v. ABC, Inc., 747 F.2d 511, 514 (9th 

Cir. 1984) ("* * * the function of a preliminary injunction is 

to preserve the status quo ad litem. ") Wright and Miller, 

Federal Practice and Procedure § 2947 (1973) ("* * * the most 

compelling reason in favor of entering a Rule 65(a) order is 

the need to prevent the judicial process from being rendered 

futile by defendant's actions or refusal to act"). 

In this case, the preliminary equitable relief that 

plaintiff seeks would in essence constitute a judgment on the 

merits of plaintiff's underlying claim and is therefor 

inappropriate. 

Plaintiff's Motion (#4) is denied. 

DATED this I"( day of December, 2015. 

\._ __ _ 

Michael Mcshane 

United States District Judge 

2 - ORDER
Exhibit (10)(a)

    

    

    

    

    

    

    Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    

    

    

    

    We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in
      Post-Effective Amendment No. 33 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-172328) and Amendment No. 770 to the 1940 Act Registration
      Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08517), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 13, 2020, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 15, 2020, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln National Variable Annuity
      Account N for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    May 15, 2020
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          32,666
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  178,069
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,456
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               226,627
<PP&E>                                          45,642
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,132,862
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          109,208
<BONDS>                                        579,027
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           341
<OTHER-SE>                                     429,140
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,132,862
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               275,712
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  161,737
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                84,870
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,758
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,989
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,975
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,014
<DISCONTINUED>                                   8,510
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,524
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.58


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32**
**CERTIFICATION**
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section1350), each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officerof ITLA Capital Corporation (the “Company”) that the Company’s Quarterly Reporton Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financialstatements included in such report.     Date: November 9, 2004 /s/ George W. Haligowski       George W. Haligowski   Chairman of the Board, President   and Chief Executive Officer       Date: November 9, 2004 /s/ Timothy M. Doyle       Timothy M. Doyle   Senior Managing Director and   Chief Financial Officer  
35
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

DUANE LEO EHMER, 

Defendant. 

No. 3:16-cr-00051-BR-10 

ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION 

OF COUNSEL PURSUANT TO THE 

PROVISIONS OF THE CRIMINAL 

JUSTICE ACT, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A 

IT IS ORDERED that CJA Panel attorney David M. Audet is appointed 

pursuant to the provisions of the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A, as 

substitute counsel, relieving Assistant Federal Public Defender Mark P. 

Ahlemeyer for Duane Leo Ehmer, effective January 28, 2016. 

C1f'/\.-

DATED this ~ day of February, 2016. 

PRESENTED BY: 

. ' Lisa C. Hay 

Federal Public Defender 

HonorabieAlll1aJ:{;wn 

United States District Court Judge 

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 130 Filed 02/09/16 Page 1 of 1
# L_2009177EN.01000401.xml

| 8.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 177/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 177/4

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 7 July 2009

appointing four Belgian members and one Belgian alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

(2009/526/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 263 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Belgian Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 24 January 2006, the Council adopted Decision 2006/116/EC appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2006 to 25 January 2010 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 24 January 2006, the Council adopted Decision 2006/116/EC appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2006 to 25 January 2010 (1).

| (2) | Four members' seats on the Committee of the Regions have become vacant following the expiry of the mandates of Mr Geert BOURGEOIS, Mr Luc VAN DEN BRANDE, Mr Patrick LACHAERT and Mr Gilbert BOSSUYT. An alternate member’s seat has become vacant following the expiry of the mandate of Mr Marc VAN DEN ABEELEN, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Four members' seats on the Committee of the Regions have become vacant following the expiry of the mandates of Mr Geert BOURGEOIS, Mr Luc VAN DEN BRANDE, Mr Patrick LACHAERT and Mr Gilbert BOSSUYT. An alternate member’s seat has become vacant following the expiry of the mandate of Mr Marc VAN DEN ABEELEN,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following are hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2010:

| a) | as members:






  — | Mr Geert BOURGEOIS, Vlaams Volksvertegenwoordiger (change of mandate), |
| --- | --- | --- |

a)

as members:

—

Mr Geert BOURGEOIS, Vlaams Volksvertegenwoordiger (change of mandate),

| — | Mr Luc VAN DEN BRANDE, Voorzitter Vlaams-Europees Verbindingsagentschap (change of mandate), |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr Luc VAN DEN BRANDE, Voorzitter Vlaams-Europees Verbindingsagentschap (change of mandate),

| — | Mr Gilbert BOSSUYT, burgemeester Menen (change of mandate), |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr Gilbert BOSSUYT, burgemeester Menen (change of mandate),

| — | Mr Patrick LACHAERT, gemeenteraadslid Merelbeke (change of mandate), |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr Patrick LACHAERT, gemeenteraadslid Merelbeke (change of mandate),

and

| b) | as alternate member:






  — | Mr Marc VAN DEN ABEELEN, burgemeester van Aartselaar (change of mandate). |
| --- | --- | --- |

b)

as alternate member:

—

Mr Marc VAN DEN ABEELEN, burgemeester van Aartselaar (change of mandate).

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on 30 June 2009.

Done at Brussels, 7 July 2009.

For the Council

The President

A. BORG

---

(1)  
  OJ L 56, 25.2.2006, p. 75.

1

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

JUAN CARLOS RODRIGUE ESPINOSA, 

Petitioner, 

Case No.3: 14 CV 01745-TC 

v. 

ORDER 

MARION FEATHER, 

Respondent. 

Magistrate Judge Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on April15, 2015. 

The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No 

objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual 

findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 

1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). 

Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error. 

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Coffin's Findings and 

Recommendation. 

Dated this /)-day of May, 2015. 

Ann Aiken, Unitid States District Judge 

Order -- Page 1 

Case 3:14-cv-01745-TC Document 19 Filed 05/12/15 Page 1 of 1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated November 10, 2006, accompanying the consolidated financial statements of Good Times Restaurants, Inc., also incorporated by reference in the Form S-8 Registration Statements with registration numbers 333-60813, 333-98407, and 333-125150 and Form S-3 Registration Statement 333-122890 of Good Times Restaurants, Inc., and to the use of our name and the statements with respect to us, as appearing under the heading "Experts" in the Registration Statements.

 

 

 

HEIN & ASSOCIATES LLP
Denver, Colorado

December 22, 2006
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Christian Andres Ojeda

,

Appellant,

v.

The State of Texas

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

'

' No. 08

- 1 5

- 00305

- CR

Appeal from the

Criminal District Court No. 3

of Dallas County, Texas

(TC# F

- 1476216

- J )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the State ’s third motion for extension of time to file the brief until

September 17

, 201 6

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE

STATE ’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Susan Hawk , the State ’s Attorney, prepare the State ’s

brief and forward the same to this Court on or before September 17 , 201 6

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 15 th day of August , 201 6

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
<PAGE>   1
                                  Exhibit 23.0



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed on or about
November 15, 1999 of Security Financial Corp, of our report dated February 10,
2000, except for Notes 14 and 18, as to which the date is March 17, 2000,
related to the consolidated balance sheet of Security Financial Corp, as of
December 31, 1999 and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 1999, which
report is incorporated by reference in this Form 10-KSB.

                                             /s/Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP
                                             Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
March 29, 2000
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2


                        Report of Independent Auditors


The Board of Directors
Logic Works, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Logic Works, Inc.
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997, and the related consolidated 
statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for 
the years ended December 31, 1997 and 1996. Our audits also included the 
financial statement schedule II - valuation and qualifying accounts for the 
years ended December 31, 1997 and 1996. These financial statements and schedule 
are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to 
express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our 
audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing 
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain 
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting 
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes 
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by 
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. 
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present 
fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Logic 
Works, Inc. and subsidiaries at December 31, 1997, and the consolidated results 
of their operations and their cash flow for the years ended December 31, 1997 
and 1996, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in 
our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in 
relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in 
all material respects the information set forth therein.


                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Princeton, New Jersey
February 10, 1998,
except for Note 14, as to which the date is
March 14, 1998
#### DINNIHAN et al., Respondents, v. LAKE ONTARIO BEACH IMP. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 16, 1896.)

Action by John Dinnihan and another, administrators, etc., against the Lake Ontario Beach Improvement Company.

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs. All concur. See 40 N. Y. Supp. 764.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

EUGENE DIVISION 

BILLY GOSTEVSKYH, 

Plaintiff, 

V. 

JASON MYERS and MARION COUNTY, 

a government entity, 

Defendants. 

No. 6:15-cv-02336-TC 

ORDER 

AIKEN, District Judge: 

Magistrate Judge Thomas Coffin has filed his Findings and 

Recommendations ("F&R") (doc. 78) recommending that this Court deny 

defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 49) This case 1s now 

before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). 

When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate judge's F&R, the 

district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the magistrate 

I-ORDER
judge's report. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore 

Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert denied, 455 U.S. 

920 (1982). Defendants have filed timely objections (doc. 83) to the F&R and plaintiff 

has filed a timely response to those objections. (doc. 89) Thus, this Court reviews the 

F&R de nova. 

Having reviewed the objections, briefing on the motion for summary judgment, 

as well as the entire file of this case, the Court finds no error in Judge Coffin's F&R. 

Thus, the Court adopts the F&R (doc. 78) in its entirely. Defendants' motion for 

summary judgment (doc. 49) is DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated this 30th day of September 2019. 

Ann Aiken 

United States District Judge 

2-ORDER