alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 167 (Wednesday, September 1, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 49061]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-18939]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meetings

    The National Science Board's Committee on Oversight hereby gives 
notice of the scheduling of a teleconference for the transaction of 
National Science Board business pursuant to the National Science 
Foundation Act and the Government in the Sunshine Act.

TIME AND DATE:  Friday, September 3, 2021, from 1:00-1:30 p.m. EDT.

PLACE:  This meeting will be held by teleconference through the 
National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 
22314.

STATUS:  Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:  The agenda of the teleconference is: Chair's 
remarks: review and discussion of proposed Office of the Inspector 
General (OIG) budget request for FY 2023; recommendation of approval to 
the National Science Board.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Point of contact for this meeting 
is: Chris Blair, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8deeefe1ece4ffcde3feeba3eae2fb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7211101e131b00321c01145c151d04">[email protected]</span></a>, 703/292-7000. Meeting information and 
updates may be found at http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/meetings/notices.jsp#sunshine. Please refer to the National Science Board 
website www.nsf.gov/nsb for general information.

Chris Blair,
Executive Assistant to the National Science Board Office.
[FR Doc. 2021-18939 Filed 8-30-21; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Technical Work Group Meeting 

Final Agenda 

Glen Canyon Dam 

Adaptive Management Program 

Technical Work Group 

Radisson Hotel 

Coronado Conference Room 

3600 N. 2nd Avenue 

Phoenix, Arizona 

Tuesday 

June 29, 2010 

Time TOPIC PERSON 

9:30a 

Welcome and Administrative 

1. Introductions and Determination of Quorum (16) 

2. Approval of March 15-16, 2010, Meeting Minutes 

3. Review of Action Items 

4. Old Business 

• Update from High Flow Experiment Protocol Workshop 

• Status of High Flow Protocol EA 

• Status on Non-native EA 

• Fall Steady Flow Plan AHG Report 

Shane Capron 

Dennis Kubly 

10:50 GCMRC Updates 

• Biology Program Updates 

o Fish PEP Implementation, plan for core monitoring development

o Non-native Fish Technical Document

o Update on trout abundance in the LCR Reach

• Cultural Program / Geomorphic Workshop

• Ecosystem Workshop Report

o Wrap-up 

o Integrated Modeling Workshop Results 

Matthew Andersen 

Helen Fairley 

Matthew Anderson/ 

Josh Korman by phone 

12:10p LUNCH

1:25 

Socio-economics AHG Report 

Information and possible recommendation to AMWG 

• GCMRC FY11-12 Proposal

Mary Barger 

Helen Fairley 

2:15 General Core Monitoring Plan – Status and Next Steps John Hamill 

Shane Capron 

3:10 Management Actions Dave Garrett 

3:45 Science Advisors’ Budget Dave Garrett 

4:00 FY 2011-12 Biennial Budget

• Reclamation 

• GCMRC 

Dennis Kubly 

John Hamill 

5:50 Public Comment Shane Capron 

5:55 Wrap-up and Adjourn 

 
Technical Work Group Meeting 

Final Agenda 

Glen Canyon Dam 

Adaptive Management Program 

Technical Work Group 

Radisson Hotel 

Coronado Conference Room 

3600 N. 2nd Avenue 

Phoenix, Arizona 

Wednesday 

June 30, 2010

Time TOPIC PERSON 

8:00A Welcome and Administrative 

1. Introductions and Determination of Quorum (16) Shane Capron 

8:05 FY 2011-12 BWP (continued)

• Reclamation 

• GCMRC 

Dennis Kubly 

John Hamill 

11:30 LUNCH

12:30p Action on Proposed Motions 

• NPS Budget Motions

• GCT Hydrograph Motions

Steve Mietz 

Rick Johnson 

1:30 FY 2011-12 BWP (continued)

• Draft Recommendation to the AMWG

John Hamill 

Dennis Kubly 

2:20 Public Comment 

2:25 Wrap-up and Adjourn Shane Capron
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 20, 2022

No. 04

- 21

- 00300

- CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF VAN L. CRAPPS, DECEASED

From the County Court at Law

, Medina County, Texas

Trial Court No. 9498

Honorable Mark Cashion , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On August 24, 2022, we ordered Appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be

dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Accordingly, we withdrew the February 2, 2022 submission

date, and we advised the parties we would reset this appeal for submission at a later date.

Appellant timely filed a response, which we have considered.

We set this cause for formal submission ON BRIEFS ONLY on October 12, 2022, before

a panel consisting of Justice Patricia O. Á lvarez, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, and Justice Lori I.

Valenzuela.

It is so ORDERED September 20, 2022

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

__________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, CLERK OF COURT
#### CLANCEY v. THE STATE.

(Decided June 13, 1912.)

Appeal from Perry Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. B. M. Miller.

W. L. Pitts, and W. T. Hendon, for appellant. R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Per curiam.

Dismissed on account of escape of appellant.
R:\GCAMP\upcoming meetings.wpd

Upcoming AMWG and TWG Meetings

Date Meeting Location Times Agenda Items Contact

REMAINING MEETINGS FOR 2000

Th, Dec 7 TWG ADWR 8 - 6 presentations from small

groups, TWG identifies

major issues for AMWG

to address in January

Perri

Benemelis

602-417-2442

x 7264

Fr., Dec 8 ? 8- noon

Fr., Dec 8 AHC NAAO Conf Rm

2 Arizona Ctr.

14th Floor

1 - 5 response to and recommendation on issues

going to AMWG

Leslie White

602-379-3199

UPCOMING MEETINGS IN 2001

W., Jan 10 TWG ? 9:30 - 4 LSSF report, Experimental Flows AHC report,

discussion of AHC

response to TWG issues

Th, Jan 11 AMWG BIA Conference

Rooms A& B

9:30 - 4 Discussion and resolution of major issues

identified by the TWG

Amy Heuslein

602-379-6750

Fr., Jan 12 8 - noon

Fr., Jan 12 AHC ? 1 - 5 follow up from AMWG

and TWG meetings

Tu, Feb. 13 TWG ? 9:30 - 5 Consensus on MOs for

recommendation to

W., Feb. 14 8 - 4 AMWG
Glen Canyon Dam Technical Work Group Meeting

Sept. 6-7, 2001

List of Attachments

No. Title Author/Presenter

1 Attendance Sheets Members

2 KAS Report Bob Winfree

3 TWG KAS Ad Hoc Committee Recommendations

Regarding Kanab Ambersnails at Vasey=s Paradise

Bob Winfree

4 Revised Draft Document Barry Gold

5 CREDA Comments on Draft Information Needs Barry Gold

6 Report from Science Advisors Barry Gold

7 Definition of Core Monitoring Gary Burton

8 Flip Charts on INs Discussion TWG Members

9 FY 2003 AMP Budget Randy Peterson

10 Terrestrial Ecosystem Activities Barbara Ralston

11 Cultural Component (pages 1-3) Ruth Lambert

12 Memo: Briefing on initial results of LSST-100 field

testing in the Colorado River ecosystem

Ted Melis

13 AIntegrated Aquatic and Terrestrial Ecosystem

Monitoring and Research

Ted Melis

14 Flips Charts on Budget Discussion TWG Members

15 Project Title: Data Base Management System and

Description of Projects

Mike Liszewski

16 Description of Projects Mike Liszewski

17 ITP Portion of FY2002 Annual Plan (get copy from

Randy)

Mike Liszewski

18 Proposal for GRCA Learning Center Bob Winfree

19 A report from the TWG Ad Hoc - Sediment Matt Kaplinski

20 Basin Hydrology graphs Chris Cutler

21 Aerial Overflights (all but one slide from the Aug 7

TWG meeting)

Mike Liszewski

22 Glen Canyon Down-Ramp Rates and Automatic

Generation Control

Kirk LaGory

23 Emergency Responses at Glen Canyon Clayton Palmer
1

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

Nos. 22-1873, 22-1874

(Filed: April 27, 2023)

*************************************

*

WESLEY KEITH MULLINGS1, *

*

Plaintiff, *

*

v. *

*

THE UNITED STATES, *

*

Defendant. *

*

*************************************

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff Wesley Keith Mullings, proceeding pro se, filed two complaints with this Court 

alleging trademark infringement stemming from the use of his name in proceedings before the 

Union Township Municipal Court, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, and the 

Newark Municipal Court. See ECF No. 1-1 at 3-8 (Case No. 22-1873); ECF No. 1-2 at 6-8 

(Case No. 22-1874). Plaintiff further alleges that Defendants – two New Jersey Municipalities 

and a number of private individuals – committed “slander, libel . . . and identity theft” and 

threatened his incarceration. See ECF No. 1 at 1 (Case No. 22-1873); ECF No. 1 at 2 (Case No. 

22-1874). Plaintiff seeks damages of “$500,000.00 [for each incident] of trademark 

infringement,” “$200,000.00 [for each incident] of slander and libel,” and other damages 

associated with alleged “failure to protect” him and “fraudulent and false statements.” ECF No. 

1 Both of Plaintiff’s complaints identify Plaintiff as “Wesley-Keith: Mullings, holder in 

due course of ®WESLEY KEITH MULLINGS©”.
2

1 at 6-7 (Case No. 22-1873); ECF No. 1 at 7-8 (Case No. 22-1874). Plaintiff further seeks 

injunctive and declaratory relief to prevent Defendants from using his name. ECF No. 1 at 7 

(Case No. 22-1873); ECF No. 1 at 7-8 (Case No. 22-1874). 

The filings of pro se litigants are held to “less stringent standards than formal pleadings 

drafted by lawyers.” Naskar v. United States, 82 Fed. Cl. 319, 320 (2008) (quoting Haines v. 

Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972)). However, pro se plaintiffs still bear the burden of 

establishing the Court’s jurisdiction and must do so by a preponderance of the evidence. 

Reynolds v. Army & Air Force Exch. Serv., 846 F.2d 746, 748 (Fed. Cir. 1988); Tindle v. United 

States, 56 Fed. Cl. 337, 341 (2003). The Court must dismiss the action if it finds subject-matter 

jurisdiction to be lacking. Adair v. United States, 497 F.3d 1244, 1251 (Fed. Cir. 2007).

Plaintiff’s complaints must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because his allegations 

are not directed at the Federal Government, nor did he name the Federal Government as 

Defendant. See ECF No. 1 at 1 (Case No. 22-1873); ECF No. 1 at 1 (Case No. 22-1874). See 28 

U.S.C. § 1491(a) (“The United States Court of Federal Claims shall have jurisdiction to render 

judgment upon any claim against the United States ...” (emphasis added)); “[T]he only proper 

defendant for any matter before [the Court of Federal Claims] is the United States, not its 

officers, nor any other individual.” Stephenson v. United States, 58 Fed. Cl. 186, 190 (2003); see 

also United States v. Sherwood, 312 U.S. 584, 588 (1941).

This case is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. The Clerk of the Court is instructed to 

enter judgment accordingly.

s/Mary Ellen Coster Williams

MARY ELLEN COSTER WILLIAMS

Senior Judge
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

      We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements of Industri-Matematik International Corp. on Form S-8 (SEC file no.
333-19737), Form S-8 (SEC file no. 333-25407), and Form S-8 (SEC file no.
333-81905) of our report dated July 29, 1999, on our audits of the consolidated
financial statements of Industri-Matematik International Corp. as of April 30,
1998 and 1999, and for the years ended April 30, 1997, 1998, and 1999, which
report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Stockholm, Sweden, July 29, 1999

OHRLINGS COOPERS & LYBRAND AB


By: /s/ ROBERT BARNDEN
    -------------------------------
    Robert Barnden
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND BALANCE SHEETS OF INDUSTRI-MATEMATIK
INTERNATIONAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES ANNEXED HERETO AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001016243
<NAME>                        INDUSTRI-MATEMATIK INTERNATIONAL CORP.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    APR-30-1999
<CASH>                           29,065,000
<SECURITIES>                     24,848,000
<RECEIVABLES>                    28,655,000
<ALLOWANCES>                      4,883,000
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 82,421,000
<PP&E>                           14,989,000
<DEPRECIATION>                    8,307,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  115,085,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            28,234,000
<BONDS>                                   0
<COMMON>                            315,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<OTHER-SE>                       83,566,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    115,085,000
<SALES>                          85,272,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 86,968,000
<CGS>                            70,882,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    71,634,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 70,402,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 (128,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (51,681,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                    (16,422,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (35,259,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                    (35,259,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                         (1.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (1.09)



</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                   EXHIBIT 23


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Brunswick Technologies, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-36921 and 333-47915) of
our report dated February 20, 1998, except for Note 14 as to which the date is
March 2, 1998, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of
Brunswick Technologies, Inc. as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and for the years
ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995, which report is included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.

                                                    /s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
                                                    ----------------------------

Portland, Maine
March 30, 1998
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thanksgiving Coffee Company, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Paul KatzeffChief Executive OfficerAugust 12, 2005
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Hr. J. D. Hall 

state hoard 0r control 

Auatln, Texas 

Dear Sir: 

Yours or recent date 

~80 0r the enumerated 

to the superintendent-ram 

mr and rcuailj not to 

also water, lights, fuel, 

ral provisions or this approprlatlon bill, 

under the h erqulsltes 0r Employees,' it Is stated: 

Wm+it 18 provided that the regliiy 0r 8 

superlntqfidsnt, orrloer, or employee or 8ny 0r 

the salU'lnstlitutlons, 81% permitted to live at 

said institution, end are to be furnished with 

board; fuel, lights, laundry, water, housing, 

or any or said Items, the vord 'f&nlly' ah811 

be oon8trued to meml the lmmedlate r8fay or 

said sup0rintendent, orrloer or employees, lnoludlng hlmselr, wire and legally dependent 

OblldreP.' 
Mr. J. D. Hall, page 2 

While generelly apesking, under the facts stated 

In your inquiry, Mr. Coley*s mother vould be oonsldered as 

8 member of his immedl8te iemily 8nd his sister would not, 

K et when you t8ke into oonsider8tlon the darinition 0r 

r8iIIily' 88 th8t word 18 used ln this spproprlstlon bill, 

\~a are of the o-on that Mr. Corley'r mother mey not 

be considered 88 8 member of his ti8di8te m&y. The 

tigi&8tIWe, ln passing the bill, seema to exclude from 

the meaang or th8t term 8ny other person other than hlm- selr, wire and legally dependent children. 

The anaver already given, 0r mume, 8nmmra the 

Inquiry with rcferenos to Mr. Corleyss sister. 

Yours very truly 

A!tTORREY OEBEUL OF TEXAS 

By (8) A. 9. Rollins 

Asslrtant 

APPROVED OPIBIOR COHtUTTJ?Z 

BY (s) Euc , cm
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 7, 2015

No. 04-15-00326-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.D.,

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-PA-01927

Honorable Martha B. Tanner, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s second motion for extension of time to file brief is hereby GRANTED. Time 

is extended to August 24, 2015. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL BE ALLOWED.

_________________________________

Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 7th day of August, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1546

To suspend until December 31, 2002, the duty on Butanamide, 2,2′-[3,3′-

dichloro[1,1′-biphenyl]-4,4′-diyl) bis (azo)] bis [N-(2,3-dihydro-2-oxo-1Hbenzimidazol-5-yl)-3-oxo.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 13, 1997

Mr. CHAFEE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend until December 31, 2002, the duty

on Butanamide, 2,2′-[3,3′-dichloro[1,1′-biphenyl]-4,4′-

diyl)bis(azo)]bis[N-(2,3-dihydro-2-oxo-1H-benzimidazol-5-

yl)-3-oxo.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1546 IS

1 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON BUTANAMIDE,

2 2,2′-[3,3′-DICHLORO [1,1′-BIPHENYL]-4,4′-DIYL)

3 BIS (AZO)] BIS [N-(2,3-DIHYDRO-2-OXO-1H4 BENZIMIDAZOL-5-YL)-3-OXO.

5 Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tar6 iff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting

7 in numerical sequence the following new subheading:

‘‘ 9902.32.XX Butanamide, 2,2′-

[3,3′-dichloro[1,1′-

biphenyl]-4,4′-

diyl)bis(azo)]bis[N2,3-dihydro-2-oxo1H-benzimidazol-5-

yl)-3-oxo provided

for in subheading

3204.17.60. ........... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2002 ’’.

8 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

9 The amendment made by section 1 applies with re10 spect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for

11 consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of

12 enactment of this Act.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND THE RELATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,979     
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   49,875 
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,512  
<INVENTORY>                                      2,444 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                47,588  
<PP&E>                                          18,640  
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,191
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 105,582
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,712
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              500
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        38,985     
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,867
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   105,582
<SALES>                                         60,085 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                60,085
<CGS>                                           28,959
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   55,576 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,170
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,339
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,295
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,044
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,044 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.24
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.1





         


AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE TO THE AMERICAN
PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.


2017 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN


 


The American Public Education, Inc. 2017
Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended (this “Amendment”) as set forth below by the Board
of Directors of American Public Education, Inc. (the “Corporation”), subject to the approval of this Amendment by the
stockholders of the Corporation:


 


1.           Section
4.1, part (i), of the Plan is amended and restated to increase the number of shares available for issuance by 1,425,000 as follows,
with the remainder of Section 4.1 remaining unchanged:


 


“(i) three million one hundred thousand
(3,100,000) shares of Stock, plus”


 


2.           Section
3.4, part (c) of the Plan is amended and restated to add the words “or substitution” where indicated in underlined
text, with the remainder of Section 3.4 remaining unchanged:


 


“(c) cancel or assume outstanding
Options or SARs with an Option Price or SAR Price, as applicable, above the current Fair Market Value in exchange or substitution
for cash, Awards, or other securities, in each case, unless such action (i) is subject to and approved by the Company’s stockholders
or (ii) would not be deemed to be a repricing under the rules of any Stock Exchange or Securities Market on which the Stock is
listed or publicly traded.”


 


3.           Section
5.1, part (a) of the Plan is amended and restated as follows, with the remainder of Section 5.1 remaining unchanged:


 


“(a) May 15, 2030,”


 


4.           The
Plan shall otherwise be unchanged by this Amendment.


 


5.           This
Amendment is adopted subject to approval by the stockholders of the Corporation at the Corporation’s 2020 Annual Meeting
of Stockholders.  If the stockholders fail to approve this Amendment at the Annual Meeting, the Plan shall continue
in existence in accordance with its terms.


 


*           *           *


 


The foregoing Amendment to the Plan was
duly adopted and approved by the Board of Directors of the Corporation on March 30, 2020, subject to the approval of the Amendment
by the stockholders of the Corporation.


 


 


	 	/s/ Thomas A. Beckett
	 	Secretary


 


The foregoing Amendment to the Plan was
duly adopted by the stockholders of the Corporation at a meeting held on May 15, 2020.


 


 


	 	/s/ Thomas A. Beckett
	 	Secretary