alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GOLDEN BEAR
GOLF, INC.'S FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         2,711,014
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  16,247,411
<ALLOWANCES>                                   2,460,266
<INVENTORY>                                    2,445,465
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               31,585,293
<PP&E>                                         32,373,180
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4,017,948
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 69,240,679
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          15,135,671
<BONDS>                                        18,776,107
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       55,050
<OTHER-SE>                                     35,273,851
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   69,240,679
<SALES>                                        39,755,343
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               67,743,287
<CGS>                                          32,107,305
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  62,837,417
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               8,103,953
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               2,174,718
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,120,148
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,302,913)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,371,717)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,931,196)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,931,196)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.53)



</TABLE>
Integrated Water Qua

Program

Five Year Plan

FYs 2002-2007
History

• 36 year period of reservoir samp

Powell)

• GCMRC Black-White-Grey (199

• $300,000/yr (USBR)

• IWQ Protocol Evaluation Panel (

• Modeling, Increase Downstream Em

• GCMRC PEP Response• GCMRC 5 Year IWQP Plan
PEP Recommendati

• Shift emphasis to downstream-o• Use modeling to increase efficac• Integrate w/other GCMRC prog• Develop proactive sampling stra• Improve WQ MO’s & IN’s (w/T• Retain Glen Canyon forebay sta• Provide info to stakeholders in t

manner
Plan Outline

• Introduction & Background• Water Quality Monitoring Plan

• Existing Sampling & Revisons• Reservoir Modeling

• Glen Canyon Tailwater & Downstream

• Needs Assessment, Model Framewor

• Database Development & Availability• R & D Activities

• Inflow Sampling, Seabird Evaluation
Modifications to Reservoir Sa

Oct-01 Oct-02 Oct-03 O

Inflow Sampling (upstream gage activation) - - -

 Model Needs Assessment

 Assessment of Existing Data

 Comparison of Inflows with Upstream Gages

 Development of Revised Inflow Sampling Plan 

 Implement Inflow Sample Collection

Reservoir Sampling Modifications - - -

 Model Needs Assessment

 Assessment of Existing Data

 Sensitivity Analyses of Parameters, Frequency, Location

 Develop and Implement Initial Modifications

 Determine Simulative Capabilities of Model

 Develop and Implement Final Modifications
IWQP Modelling Activ

Oct-01 Oct-02 Oct-03 Oct-04 O

 Plan Development and USBR

Coordination

 Model Selection

 Data needs evaluation

 Issue RFP

 Model Calibration and ValidationHydrodynamic

 Evaluate Meterological, Bathymetric,

and Inflow Files

 Initiate Meterological Data

Collection

 Perform initial calibration

 Assessment, validation, and

application

 Model Calibration and ValidationDownstream Model Calibration and ValidationChemical Water Quality Model Calibration and ValidationBiological
Seabird Evaluation

Oct-01 Oct-02 Oct-03 Oct-04 

 Historical Data Assessment

 Field Demonstration

 Final Evaluation
Downstream Monitoring R

Oct-01 Oct-02 Oct-03 Oct-04 

 Information Needs Assessment

from TWG and Pis

 Integration and Review,

possible workshop

 Develop and Implement Initial

Revisions

 Determine Simulative

Capabilities of Model

 Assess Initial Revisions and

Information Needs

 Develop and Implement Final

Modifications
Next Steps

• TWG review IWQP Draft Plan

• Provide comments to GCMRC by Ju

• TWG review Final IWQP in Aug• TWG may recommend adoption 

AMWG
Glen Canyon Dam Technical Work Group Meeting
 

June 14‐15, 2016
 

List of Attachments
 

No. Document Author/Presenter

1 Action Item Tracking Report Vineetha Kartha

2 Basin Hydrology and FY17 Hydrograph Development PPT Paul Davidson

3 Science Advisor Program Charter and Protocols PPT Dr. David Braun

4 Benthic Ecology of the Colorado river, GCNRA, Aquatic

Invertebrate Biogeography and the Role of Shallow

Hyporheic Anoxia (SHA) PPT

Dr. Larry Stevens

5a Budget Process Paper amended on 3/20/11 Table 1

Budget Comments Received for June 14‐15 TWG Meeting

Revised May 31, 2016

Overview of Reclamation FY15‐17 Budget PPT

GCMRC Budget PPT

Shane Capron

Katrina Grantz

Scott VanderKooi

5b

5c

5d

6 Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program AMWG

FACA Committee Guidance “Loveless Document”

Randy Seaholm

7a GCDAMP Triennial Budget and Work Plan Process TWG

Review Draft June15, 2016

TWG Comments on Budget Process

Shane Capron

7b

8 Lake Powell Water Quality Sampling Program PPT Robert Radtke

9a Conditions and Processes Affecting Sand Resources at

Archaeological Sites in the Colorado River Corridor PPT

Dr. Joel Sankey

9b GCDAMP Protocol Evaluation Panel Prospectus: Fisheries

Program Review

Dr. David Braun

Scott VanderKooi
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                       5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0001000686
<NAME>                          North American Resorts, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                               1
<CURRENCY>                                        US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                   JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                     SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                            1
<CASH>                                                     0
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              0
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      340176
<PP&E>                                                     0
<DEPRECIATION>                                             0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        764282
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 725752
<BONDS>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                          1471583
<COMMON>                                              103294
<OTHER-SE>                                          (1536347)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          764282
<SALES>                                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           0
<CGS>                                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           1699
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (1699)
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       (455975)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (457674)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0



</TABLE>
#### In re DANNER. In the matter of the application of Harry R. Danner.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 6, 1896.)

No opinion. The applicant’s papers are defective, in that they fail to show that he is either a citizen of the United States or a resident of the Second judicial department. This proof may be supplied.
<PAGE>




                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Dura Automotive Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Keith R. Marchiando, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.





/s/ Keith R. Marchiando
-----------------------

Keith R. Marchiando
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
March 11, 2005
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

MERITAGE HOMEOWNERS' 

ASSOCIATION, 

v. 

OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC., 

Plaintiff, Case No. 6:14 CV 01747-TC 

ORDER 

Defendant. 

Magistrate Judge Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on March 25, 2015. 

The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No 

objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual 

findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 

1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). 

Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error. 

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Coffin's Findings and 

Recommendation. 

Dated this fl day of April, 2015. 

Ann Aiken, United States District Judge 

Order -- Page 1 

Case 6:14-cv-01747-TC Document 22 Filed 04/17/15 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 99.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Apogent Technologies Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for
the period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffrey C. Leathe, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/    JEFFREY C. LEATHE


Jeffrey C. Leathe


Chief Financial Officer


December 11, 2002








This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT GILBERT M. MORENO, ) ) Appellant, ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-1139 ) STATE OF FORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed October 2, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Charles E. Roberts, Judge. Jean M. Henne, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee and Allison C. Heim, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, MORRIS, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
Joe Tomelleri Illustrations










































































































































<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          36,285
<SECURITIES>                                    32,085
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,882
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,694
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               114,459
<PP&E>                                           9,131
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 131,894
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           55,222
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                      61,541
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   131,894
<SALES>                                         24,250
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                43,455
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,054
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,596
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,393
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,713
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,680
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,680
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .12<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11
<FN>
<F1>
For purposes of this exhibit, primary means basic.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH 

	NO. 2-05-4-38300-371-CV

MARY AUTREY D/B/A MARY AUTREY 	APPELLANT

AND ASSOCIATESJoOhHnNnNyY WiIlLlLiIaAmMsSoOnN aAnNdD ShHaAyYlLyYnN WiIlLlLiIaAmMsSoOnN	APPELLANTS	

SHAYLYN WILLIAMSON

	V.

RANDALL YOUNG   	APPELLEE

FiIrRsStT TeExXaAsS HoOmMeEsS, InNcC. dD/bB/aA G GALLERY CUSTOM HOMES D/B/A FIRST TEXAS CUSTOM HOMES	APPELLEES

GALLERY CUSTOM HOMES D/B/A FIRST TEXAS CUSTOM HOMES FIRST TEXAS CUSTOM HOMES

FIRST TEXAS CUSTOM HOMES

aAlLlLeErRyY CuUsStToOmM HoOmMeEsS dD/bB/aA FiIrRsStT TeExXaAsS CuUsStToOmM HoOmMeEsS

	----------

	FROM COUNTY393RDTHE 393RD DISTRICT COURT  COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF DENTON TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	On jUNEJune 2, 2005April 12, 2001, we notified appellants that their its brief had not been filed as required by TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a).  We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellants or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  We have not received any response.

	Because appellant’s’ brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

	Appellants shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

								PER CURIAM 		

PANEL D:	cayCAYCE, C.J.; LIVINGSTON,  and DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.

	DELIVERED:  jJUNEune 30, 2005	DO NOT PUBLISH

		TEX. R. APP. P.  47.3(a)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                          146,318
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   28,869
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                202,267
<PP&E>                          16,434,240
<DEPRECIATION>                  4,273,541
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  13,022,213
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           364,677
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        0
<OTHER-SE>                      0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    13,022,213
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                1,504,377
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   2,029,574
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                93,511
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              296,137
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (618,708)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (618,708)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   0
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1833 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to include guidance on how 

dependent students with parents without SSNs may obtain Federal student assistance. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 16, 2015 

Mr. VEASEY (for himself, Ms. ADAMS, Mr. CA ́RDENAS, Mr. CASTRO of Texas, 

Mr. ELLISON, Ms. FUDGE, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. GUTIE ́RREZ, Mr. HASTINGS, Mr. HINOJOSA, Mrs. LAWRENCE, Ms. LEE, Ms. LOFGREN, Ms. 

MICHELLE LUJAN GRISHAM of New Mexico, Mr. MEEKS, Ms. NORTON, 

Mr. RANGEL, Ms. LINDA T. SA ́NCHEZ of California, Mr. VARGAS, Mrs. 

WATSON COLEMAN, Mr. CONYERS, Mrs. CAPPS, Mr. SMITH of Washington, Ms. WILSON of Florida, Mr. AL GREEN of Texas, Mrs. BEATTY, 

Ms. SEWELL of Alabama, Mr. RUSH, Mr. BEN RAY LUJA ́N of New Mexico, Mr. PIERLUISI, Mr. DANNY K. DAVIS of Illinois, and Ms. EDDIE

BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to include 

guidance on how dependent students with parents without SSNs may obtain Federal student assistance. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘FAFSA for All Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1833 IH

1 SEC. 2. FAFSA INFORMATION FOR DEPENDENT STUDENTS 

2 WITH PARENTS WITHOUT SSNS. 

3 Section 483(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 

4 (20 U.S.C. 1090(a)) is amended— 

5 (1) in paragraph (3), by adding at the end the 

6 following: 

7 ‘‘(I) INFORMATION FOR DEPENDENT STU8 DENTS WITH PARENTS WITHOUT SSNS.—The 

9 Secretary shall include on the same website 

10 used to provide students with the electronic 

11 version of the forms described in this paragraph 

12 the guidance described in paragraph 

13 (12)(B)(ii).’’; and 

14 (2) in paragraph (12)— 

15 (A) by striking ‘‘The Secretary’’ and in16 serting the following: 

17 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary’’; and 

18 (B) by adding at the end the following: 

19 ‘‘(B) DEPENDENT STUDENTS WITH PAR20 ENTS WITHOUT SSNS.—The Secretary shall in21 clude on the forms— 

22 ‘‘(i) questions to determine whether— 

23 ‘‘(I) a dependent student meets 

24 the requirements of section 484(a)(5); 

25 and 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1833 IH

1 ‘‘(II) the parents of a dependent 

2 student have a valid social security 

3 number; and 

4 ‘‘(ii) in a case in which a dependent 

5 student meets the requirements of section 

6 484(a)(5), but whose parents do not have 

7 a valid social security number, detailed 

8 guidance on how the student may obtain 

9 the Federal financial assistance described 

10 in paragraph (1), including an online tool 

11 that allows the student to upload docu12 ments required to receive such assist13 ance.’’. 

14 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

15 The amendments made by section 1 shall be effective 

16 beginning academic year 2015–2016. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 9 D0 16 4 . J I MMY HI LL v

. THE STATE.

On Au g u st 2 2
, 20 1 8
, th e t ri al co u rt en t ered an o rd er rev o ki n g J im m y Hi l l ’ s
p ro b at i o n

. Hi l l fi led t h i s ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal o n Oct o ber 2 5
, 2 0 1 8.
W e, h o wev er, l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n

. An ap p l icat i o n fo r di s cret i o n ary ap p eal m u s t b e fi l ed wi t h i n 3 0 d ay s o f t h e

en t ry o f t h e o rd er o r ju dg m en t t o b e ap p eal ed

. See OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (d ). Th e
req u i rem en t s o f OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 are ju ri s d ict i o n al
, an d t h i s Co urt can no t accep t an
ap p li cat io n fo r ap peal n ot m ad e i n co m p l i an ce t h erewi th

. See Bo yl e v. S t at e , 1 9 0 Ga. Ap p

. 7 3 4, 73 4 (3 8 0 SE2 d 57 ) (1 9 8 9 ). Hi l l fi l ed h i s ap p l icat i o n 6 4 d ay s aft er en t ry o f

t h e o r d er he s eek s to ap peal

. Hi s ap p l i cat i o n i s t h u s un t i m el y , an d i t is h ereb y DISM ISSED fo r l ack o f ju ri s d i ct i o n

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. November 15, 2018

11/15/2018
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

VICTOR DALFONSE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 235 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 17th day of October, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.