alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 21.1 - SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                          State or Jurisdiction
                                                                       % of Voting Securities               Under the Law of
Name                                                                            Owned                        Which Organized
----                                                                   ----------------------             ---------------------
<S>                                                                     <C>                               <C>
Subsidiaries of National Processing, Inc.

National Processing Company,  LLC.                                               100                           Ohio
NPC International S.A. de C.V.                                                    99.6                         Mexico
Caribbean Data Services, Ltd.                                                    100                           Delaware
JBH Travel Audit Inc.                                                            100                           Colorado
National Processing Company International (Fiji) Limited                         100                           Fiji
National Processing Services, Incorporated                                       100                           Ohio
NPC Alliance, Inc.                                                               100                           Delaware
ABN AMRO Merchant Services, LLC                                                   70                           Delaware
</TABLE>
# L_2009120EN.01000101.xml

| 15.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 120/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 120/1

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 402/2009

of 14 May 2009

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in particular Article 138(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 15 May 2009.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 14 May 2009.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.

2

---

ANNEX

Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

| (EUR/100 kg) |
| --- |
| CN code | Third country code (1) | Standard import value |
| 0702 00 00 | MA | 53,3 |
| TN | 115,0 |
| TR | 101,5 |
| ZZ | 89,9 |
| 0707 00 05 | JO | 155,5 |
| MA | 32,7 |
| TR | 143,8 |
| ZZ | 110,7 |
| 0709 90 70 | JO | 216,7 |
| TR | 116,6 |
| ZZ | 166,7 |
| 0805 10 20 | EG | 44,5 |
| IL | 54,1 |
| MA | 43,6 |
| TN | 49,2 |
| TR | 99,9 |
| US | 49,3 |
| ZZ | 56,8 |
| 0805 50 10 | AR | 50,9 |
| TR | 56,4 |
| ZA | 67,0 |
| ZZ | 58,1 |
| 0808 10 80 | AR | 80,2 |
| BR | 71,7 |
| CL | 72,4 |
| CN | 100,3 |
| MK | 42,0 |
| NZ | 105,1 |
| US | 133,5 |
| UY | 71,7 |
| ZA | 80,2 |
| ZZ | 84,1 |

(EUR/100 kg)

CN code

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

0702 00 00

MA

53,3

TN

115,0

TR

101,5

ZZ

89,9

0707 00 05

JO

155,5

MA

32,7

TR

143,8

ZZ

110,7

0709 90 70

JO

216,7

TR

116,6

ZZ

166,7

0805 10 20

EG

44,5

IL

54,1

MA

43,6

TN

49,2

TR

99,9

US

49,3

ZZ

56,8

0805 50 10

AR

50,9

TR

56,4

ZA

67,0

ZZ

58,1

0808 10 80

AR

80,2

BR

71,7

CL

72,4

CN

100,3

MK

42,0

NZ

105,1

US

133,5

UY

71,7

ZA

80,2

ZZ

84,1

---

(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
  ZZ
  ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

---
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 College Station, Texas
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home People & Locations







Jimmy  Parker
                        Location Support Staff

                        




                        
                        Maintenance Mechanic
                        Phone: (979) 260-9246
                        
                        
                        Fax: (979) 260-9377(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Resource Related Research Projects (R24 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).                    

*Date:*                         September 22, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G42B, Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Louis A. Rosenthal, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G42B, Rockville, MD 20852, (240) 669-5070,                         *rosenthalla@niaid.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: August 23, 2021.

Tyeshia Roberson-Curtis,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. 

[FR Doc. 2021-18493 Filed 8-26-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
# L_2009061EN.01001001.xml

| 5.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 61/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 61/10

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 172/2009

of 4 March 2009

fixing the import duties applicable to certain husked rice from 5 March 2009

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1), and in particular Article 137 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Based on the information provided by the competent authorities, the Commission notes that import licences for husked rice falling within CN code 1006 20, other than import licences for basmati rice, were issued in respect of 221 765 tonnes for the period from 1 September 2008 to 28 February 2009. The import duty for husked rice falling within CN code 1006 20 other than basmati rice should therefore be adjusted. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Based on the information provided by the competent authorities, the Commission notes that import licences for husked rice falling within CN code 1006 20, other than import licences for basmati rice, were issued in respect of 221 765 tonnes for the period from 1 September 2008 to 28 February 2009. The import duty for husked rice falling within CN code 1006 20 other than basmati rice should therefore be adjusted.

| (2) | The applicable duty must be fixed within 10 days of the end of the period mentioned above. This Regulation should therefore come into force immediately, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The applicable duty must be fixed within 10 days of the end of the period mentioned above. This Regulation should therefore come into force immediately,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The import duty for husked rice falling within CN code 1006 20 shall be EUR 42,5 per tonne.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 March 2009.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

---
U.S. Department of the Interior

U.S. Geological Survey

Food availability in the 

Little Colorado River 

over space and time

Jeffrey D. Muehlbauer, 

Theodore A. Kennedy, 

Eric W. Kortenhoeven

Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center

Southwest Biological Science Center
Why you should care

 Little Colorado River (LCR): Home to 

endangered humpback chub
Why you should care

 LCR: Home to chub

 Chub eat bugs 

“drift-feeding fish”
Why you should care

 LCR: Home to chub

 Chub eat bugs

 More bugs = More/fat chub?

=

=

Vs.
Chub hang outs

 But why?

 (possibly food?)

Map from Van 

Haverbeke et al 2013. 

J. Fish Wild Mgmt
Insect sampling

 Sticky traps

 Surrogate for in-water densities
Insect sampling

 Sticky traps

 Surrogate for 

in-water densities

 Every river km, 

5x per year
Insect sampling

 Sticky traps

 Surrogate for 

benthic densities

 Every river km, 

5x per year

 Prodigious catch 

rates

Preliminary data, do not cite.
Results: Seasonal feast or famine

 Slim pickings 

outside of 

April/May

Yay

:(

Preliminary data, do not cite.
Longitudinal patterns: All bugs

Preliminary data, do not cite.
P:

Longitudinal patterns: Fat, juicy bugs

 (AKA EPT)

T:

E:

Mayflies

Caddisflies

Stoneflies

Preliminary data, do not cite.
Digging (diving?) deeper

 So we’ve got a bug pattern...

 It may (partly) explain the chub...

 But what explains the bugs?

Preliminary data, do 

not cite.
A travertine stream

 Crystal-clear 

at spring

 Increasingly 

turbid 

downstream

Spring Midway

Mouth
Light penetration River flow direction

Spring + 4 km + 10 km

Preliminary data, do not cite.
Turbidity influences

 So we’d expect fewer bugs downstream...

 But what about the rest of the pattern?

Fat, juicy bugs All bugs ?

Preliminary data, do not cite.
Canyon geography

 Narrow upstream, 

widens downstream

 N/S upper half, 

E/W lower half
(Un)Made in the shade

Upper river Lower river
Above-water lux

 1.5x more light 

downstream than 

upstream

Lower river

Upper river

Preliminary data, do not cite.
A light double-whammy

 Upstream:

 Clear water, but shady

 Downstream:

 Sunny, but turbid

More turbid Sunny Shady

Preliminary data, do not cite.
 2016: Resolving 

patterns

Conclusion

 Dual controls on bug densities

 Both light-related: shading vs. turbidity

 Can be contrasting or complementary

Preliminary data, do not cite.
Thanks. Questions?

 All samples painstakingly (yet cheerfully!) picked by student 

intern David Goodenough

More turbid Sunny Shady

Preliminary data, do not cite.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Sanford K. Dennis, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mallon, J.), rendered May 15, 1984, convicting him of burglary in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of those branches of the defendant’s omnibus motion which were to suppress identification testimony and physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that his arrest was not based upon probable cause and, therefore, the physical evidence obtained from him should have been suppressed as the fruits of an illegal arrest. We disagree. The defendant was seized by the arresting officer along the burglar’s anticipated escape route. The defendant matched the complainant’s general physical description of the burglar, which included sex, race and size, and was carrying distinctive clothing worn by the burglar during the commission of the crime, to wit, a black jacket and a light-colored golf cap *(see, United States v Fay,*240 F Supp 591; *People v Chapman,*103 AD2d 494; *cf. People v Riddick,*110 AD2d 787). The defendant also had in his possession a screwdriver. According to the complainant, he had informed the arresting officer and his partner, prior to their search for the perpetrator, that when he confronted the intruder inside his home, the intruder had produced a sharp instrument from his back pocket and used it to threaten the complainant. Additionally, the defendant’s reaction to the police encounter evidenced the state of mind of one who had just committed a crime *(see, People v Johnson,*102 AD2d 616, 624-625). Based on the aforenoted facts and circumstances known to the arresting officer, that officer possessed probable cause to arrest the defendant as the perpetrator of the burglary.

We also reject the defendant’s contention that the showup was unnecessarily suggestive. Showups which are close in time and location to the scene of the crime, as occurred here, are appropriate measures to secure prompt and reliable iden*326tifications *(People v Brnja,*50 NY2d 366, 372; *see, People v Fleury,*106 AD2d 460). Although displaying the defendant to the complainant while he was handcuffed was less than ideal, it did not render the showup constitutionally infirm *(see, People v Johnson, supra,*at p 627; *People v Thomas,*105 AD2d 1098). Nor was the showup rendered unnecessarily suggestive when the defendant was compelled to don the black jacket and cap that he allegedly wore at the time of the burglary *(see, People v Mayers,*100 AD2d 558). In any event, there clearly was an independent basis for the complainant’s in-court identification as he had observed and conversed with the burglar under good lighting conditions, from a distance of approximately four feet and for a period of about three minutes.

We have reviewed the arguments raised in the defendant’s supplemental brief and find them to be without merit. Mangano, J. P., Niehoff, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 6638** 

SAM FREDERICK , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,
v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Beaufort
. Mary G. Lewis , District Judge. ( 9:15

- cv - 02699

- MGL )

Submitted : September 13, 2016 Decided: September 15, 2016

Before TRAXLER, AGEE, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Sam Frederick, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Sam Frederick appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant the United States summary judgment on Frederick’s malpractice action , brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346, 2671

– 2680 (West 2006 & Supp. 201 6 ). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’s judgment
. Frederick v. United States , No. 9:15

- cv - 02699

- MGL ( D.S.C
. Apr. 4, 2016 ). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
pre sented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Page 1 – REPLY TO THE GOVERNMENT’S RESPONSE (ECF #571)

KENNETH MEDENBACH SWIS#794840

MCDC

11540 NE Inverness Drive

Portland, OR 97220

Phone: (503) 699-7333

FAX: (503) 345-9372

e-mail: mattschindler@comcast.net

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

PORTLAND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff,

vs.

KENNETH MEDENBACH,

 Defendant(s).

Case No. 3:16-CR-00051-16-BR

REPLY TO THE 

GOVERNMENT’S

RESPONSE (ECF #571)

Pro se defendant, Kenneth Medenbach, replies to the government’s Response 

to his Motion to Dismiss as follows:

Throughout this case and United States v. Medenbach, 1:15-cr-00407-MC,

the government has fundamentally misunderstood the thrust of defendant’s 

challenge and the courts have simply ignored his arguments. The issues addressed 

by the Court of Appeals in the seminal case of United States v. Medenbach, 116 

F.3d 487, 1997 WL 306437 (C.A.9 (Wash.) are entirely different from those raised 

in Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF #505) and his Motion to Reconsider (ECF 

#361). 

Defendant’s textual arguments regarding the meaning of “other property” 

under the Oregon Territorial Act of 1848 inexplicably do not even merit a response. 

The arguments defendant raises concerning the meaning of the term “other 

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 619 Filed 05/27/16 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 – REPLY TO THE GOVERNMENT’S RESPONSE (ECF #571)

property” for the purposes of the Oregon Territorial Act of 1848 have never been 

considered by any federal court previously and have been ignored by the 

government in its responses.

Like the government, Judge McShane did not address those arguments either. 

The only issue raised in the Motion to Dismiss rejected by Judge McShane through 

the order the government cites extensively was whether the 10th Amendment 

prevented the federal government from owning public lands in the states. Order 

ECF #35, United States v. Medenbach, 1:15-cr-00407-MC. Judge McShane, like 

the government, never considered and has never replied to his textual arguments 

concerning the Territorial Act of 1848.

He requests that in the absence of any authority contradicting his 

interpretation of the Territorial Act, the Court dismiss the Indictment now pending 

against these defendants.

Respectfully submitted on May 27, 2016,

Kenneth Medenbach

Pro Se Defendant.

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 619 Filed 05/27/16 Page 2 of 2
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1821

To suspend temporarily the duty on polymethine sensitizing dyes for imaging

applications.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 23, 1998

Mr. LAUTENBERG introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on polymethine sensitizing

dyes for imaging applications.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON CER4 TAIN SENSITIZING DYES.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

8 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.29.34 Polymethine photo-sensitizing

dyes (provided for in subheadings 2934.90.90 and

2933.19.90) .......................... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2001 ’’.
2

•S 1821 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to goods entered,

3 or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after

4 the date that is 15 days after the date of enactment of

5 this Act.

Æ