alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 - PLAINTIFF’S WITNESS LIST 

Dallas S. DeLuca, OSB #072992 

DallasDeLuca@MarkowitzHerbold.com 

Kristin M. Malone, OSB #151254 

KristinMalone@MarkowitzHerbold.com 

Katherine M. Acosta, OSB #165223 

KatherineAcosta@MarkowitzHerbold.com 

MARKOWITZ HERBOLD PC 

1211 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 3000 

Portland, OR 97204-3730 

Tel: (503) 295-3085 

Fax: (503) 323-9105 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

PORTLAND DIVISION 

ANDREA OLSON, 

Plaintiff,

v. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, by and 

through the Department of Energy and 

Bonneville Power Administration; and 

JAMES RICHARD PERRY, Secretary of 

the Department of Energy, 

Defendants.

Case No. 3:15-cv-02216-HZ

PLAINTIFF’S WITNESS LIST

Plaintiff, Andrea Olson, hereby submits this list of witnesses pursuant to the Court’s Trial 

Management Order, ECF 117. 

1. Andrea Olson, Plaintiff. 

 DATED this 29th day of August, 2018. 

MARKOWITZ HERBOLD PC

By: /s/ Dallas DeLuca

Dallas S. DeLuca, OSB #072002 

DallasDeLuca@MarkowitzHerbold.com 

Case 3:15-cv-02216-HZ Document 146 Filed 08/29/18 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 - PLAINTIFF’S WITNESS LIST 

Kristin M. Malone, OSB #151254 

KristinMalone@MarkowitzHerbold.com 

Katherine M. Acosta, OSB #165223 

KatherineAcosta@MarkowitzHerbold.com 

Of Attorneys for Plaintiff 

779014

Case 3:15-cv-02216-HZ Document 146 Filed 08/29/18 Page 2 of 2
Chute Falls Translocation Up

Kirk Young, Dennis Stone, Randy 

VanHaverbeke, Michael Pillow 

USFWS 
Outline

 Translocation Fish Collection Change Chute Falls - Interesting Findings and 

Manuscript Update

 September Sediment Event
Little Colorado River

Chute Falls

Lower Reach/Atomizer

Upper Reach
Translocation Fish Collection Change

 Larval Collection – May (Hav & Shin YOY Collection – Oct. (Chute) July Trans. Effort Eliminated

 $$$ Reduced LCR Traffic
Interesting 

Findings  Growth

Mean growth rates ± 2 SE (mm/day)

Humpback Chub size classes 

N

===
Growth 

By the 1st ensuing 

being released 16

chub had achieve

(>200 mm 

AGE-1 Total length (mm) 

AGE-1 (1st ensuing 

Spring)

N=152Median = 167 mmRange = 79-235 mm127 chub < 200 25 chub > 200
AGE-2 Total length (mm) 

Growth 

By the 2nd ensuing 

being released 96

chub had achieved 

Manuscrip

AGE-2 (Following 2nd 

Spring)

N=115Median = 242 mmRange = 175-300 mm5 chub < 200; 110 chub > 200
September Sediment Event (25 Sep 20

 Highest turbidity reading of 415 daily 

measurements (189,696 NTU)

 Water settled in 5-gallon buckets 

resulted in only 2 inches of water (on1/7 of each bucket)

 Hoop nets buried HBC, SPD, BHS, FMS, CRP, CCF shif

to shoreline in respiratory distress

 A few HBC, BHS, SPD and many CRP 

were known to have died

 Native fish catches were relatively go

the next trip!
Thank You
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 12-1349

NUPUR PATEL,

Petitioner,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,

Respondent.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on February 1, 2013, is

amended as follows:

On page 14, lines 9-11, replace "Consequently, we hold that

the BIA erred in finding Patel removable, and need not decide

whether he would be eligible for a waiver." with "Consequently, we

hold that the BIA erred in finding Patel removable on the ground

that the record of conviction revealed an intent to cause a

permanent deprivation, and we need not decide whether he would be

eligible for a waiver."
Hydropower Economics Questions - Rick Johnson 

(TWG Meeting, April 8-9, 2008) 

1. Basin Fund

a. What is the law and policy that directs management of the Basin Fund? 

b. Who makes the decisions? 

c. Is it possible for the Basin Fund to default? If so, what happens to the various programs 

funded by the Basin Fund? 

d. What happens to the Basin Fund once the dam, transmission lines, etc., are repayed? 

e. What are the (actual or projected) sources of income for the Basin Fund in WY2007 and 

2008? 

f. Are all revenues generated by CRSP facilities in the Basin Fund? 

g. What are the (actual or projected) expenditures for the Basin Fund in WY2007 and 2008? 

How is the money spent? 

h. What reports regarding income and expenses are available? 

i. Has the Basin Fund been audited? 

2. Reallocation of costs

a. How were the costs of construction, operation, maintenance, replacement and emergency 

expenditures for Glen Canyon Dam initially allocated and then reallocated following passage 

of the GCPA (see Section 1804(e) “Allocations of Costs”) 

b. Have there been any other reallocations of costs? 

3. Replacement Resources Report

a. What is the upshot of the 1998 Replacement Resources Report? 

b. Are the conclusions still applicable today? 

4. WAPA’s rates/contracts

a. Please clarify how WAPA contracts for power (i.e., distinguish between capacity, energy, 

and composite rate). 

b. How does season and time of day affect rates charged by WAPA? 

c. What percentage of energy produced at Glen is considered load v. load-following? 

d. How does the rate charged by WAPA for power from GCD compare to the cost of power on 

the open market? 

e. Why do WAPA contracts include provisions to acquire replacement power? 

f. How much CRSP power goes to power producers (e.g., SRP, UAMPS), and how much goes 

to consumer only entities? 

g. How much CRSP power goes to Federal government facilities such as military bases? 

5. Costs of the 2008 BHBF

a. What (real or projected) costs of the 1996, 2004, and 2008 BHBF are attributed to water 

routed through the bypass tubes v. replacement power costs v. other costs? 

b. Which costs are reimbursable and which are non-reimburasable? 

c. Who pays the costs associated with a BHBF; rate payers or taxpayers? 

d. What is the financial impact to an individual household from the 2008 BHBF?
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of

- )

)

Industrial Marine, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 63646

- ADR

)

Under Contract No. N68335

- 20

- A

- 0061 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT : Mr. Justin Hawkins

Vice President

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Craig D. Jensen, Esq.

Navy Chief Trial Attorney

Daniel C. Carleton, Esq.

Trial Attorney

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: October 1 2 , 2023

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63646

- ADR

, Appeal of Industrial

Marine, Inc. , rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: October 12, 2023 CHRISTOPHER M. MCNULTY

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
**EXHIBIT 12.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Thibault de Tersant, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Dassault Systèmes; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe company as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 4. The Company’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company andhave:
 a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b. [omitted pursuant to the guidance of Release No. 33-8238 (June 5,2003)]  c. evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d. disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the periodcovered by the annual report that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
5. The Company’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
Date:  June 30, 2004         By:  /s/  Thibault de Tersant   Name:  Thibault de Tersant    Title:  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CONTROLLERI, Susan M. Knutson, certify that:1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Good Times Restaurants Inc.;2.	Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrant and have:a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a)	All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

Susan M. Knutson*ControllerDecember* 27, 2005
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1
     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


The Board of Directors
PLATINUM technology International, inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-61581, 333-57307, 333-03284, 33-85798, 33-41248, 33-96762, 333-00454,
333-20897, 333-45131, 333-57311) on Form S-8, (No. 333-45133) on Form S-3 and
(Nos. 333-71637, 33-94410) on Form S-4 of PLATINUM technology International,
inc. of our reports dated February 8, 1999, except for Note 19, which is as of
March 29, 1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of PLATINUM
technology International, inc. as of December 31, 1998 and 1997 and the related
consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders' equity
and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
1998, and the related consolidated financial statement schedule, which reports
appear in the December 31, 1998 annual report on Form 10-K of PLATINUM
technology International, inc.


                                                                    /s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 29, 1999
recommended that Herbe be suspended for two years and be required to 

pay the costs of the disciplinary proceedings within six months of receipt 

of the bill of costs. 

Although persuasive, the findings and recommendations of a 

panel of the Southern Nevada Disciplinary Board are not binding, and this 

court's automatic review of a panel's decision is conducted de novo. SCR 

105(3)(b); In re Discipline of Droz, 123 Nev. 163, 168, 160 P.3d 881, 884-85 

(2007). The panel's findings of misconduct must be supported by clear and 

convincing evidence. In re Discipline of Drakulich, 111 Nev. 1556, 1566, 

908 P.2d 709, 715 (1995). 

Having reviewed the record, we conclude that clear and 

convincing evidence supports the panel's findings that Herbe committed 

the violations alleged. See SCR 105(2)(0. We further conclude that the 

panel's recommended discipline is appropriately tailored to Herbe's 

misconduct, and we approve the recommendation in its entirety. 

Accordingly, attorney James Herbe is hereby suspended from 

the practice of law for two years. However, we note that Herbe is 

currently suspended for failure to meet his Continuing Legal Education 

(CLE) requirements, and has been so suspended since July 2010. See In re 

Application of the Bd. of Continuing Legal Educ., Docket No. 56143 (Order 

Dismissing Petition as to Certain Respondent Attorneys and Granting 

Petition as to Certain Respondent Attorneys, July 21, 2010). In light of 

this, the suspension imposed in the instant order will not commence until 

after Herbe resolves his CLE suspension. See SCR 213. As such, by the 

time Herbe is eligible to petition for reinstatement, he will have been 

continuously suspended for five years or more. Therefore, Herbe shall 

provide proof of successful completion of the Nevada State Bar 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A ce). 
Parraguirre 

Cherry 

L&e, , J. 

Examination, including the Multistate Professional Responsibility 

Examination, prior to any petition for reinstatement. See SCR 116(5). 

Herbe shall pay the costs of the disciplinary proceedings within six 

months of receipt of the State Bar's bill of costs. See SCR 120. Upon any 

attempted reinstatement, Herbe shall comply with SCR 116. Additionally, 

Herbe shall comply with SCR 115 and the State Bar shall comply with 

SCR 121.1 

It is so ORDERED. 

/n 

Gibbons 

Pickering 

A--Lt te2-4- 1 J. 

Hardesty 

Saitta 

cc: Jeffrey Albregts, Chair, Southern Nevada Disciplinary Board 

David A. Clark, Bar Counsel 

Kimberly K. Farmer, Executive Director, State Bar of Nevada 

James E. Herbe 

Perry Thompson, Admissions Office, United States Supreme Court 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 3 

(0) 1947A 

C.J.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

JEFF BOARDMAN, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

PACIFIC SEAFOOD GROUP, 

et al., 

Defendants. 

PANNER, District Judge: 

MEDFORD DIVISION 

No. 1:15-108-CL 

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING 

ORDER 

Based on the record, including the declaration of Michael 

Haglund, ECF No. 4, I conclude that Plaintiffs are entitled to a 

temporary restraining order pending a hearing on a possible 

preliminary injunction. From 1:00 p.m. on Friday, January 23, 

2015 until 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, February 3, 2015, Defendants and 

their agents are prohibited from concluding any transaction 

involving the acquisition of stock, capital assets, or real 

property from Ocean Gold Seafoods and any of its shareholders or 

1 - TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER 

Case 1:15-cv-00108-MC Document 11 Filed 01/23/15 Page 1 of 2
affiliated companies including but not limited to Ocean Protein, 

LLC, Ocean Cold, LLC, and Ocean Gold Transport LLC. Defendants 

are required to produce all documents, whether hard copies or 

electronic, related in any way to the proposed·transaction by 

Defendants to acquire stock or assets of Ocean Gold Seafoods, Inc. 

or any of its affiliated companies. 

All parties are ordered to appear in this court on Tuesday, 

February~ 2015, at 10:00 a.m., to show cause why this court 

should not issue a preliminary injunction in accordance with this 

temporary restraining order. Defendants shall file a brief in 

response by Thursday, January 29, 2015. 

Plaintiffs shall post a bond in the amount of $ /'~ ~&2 ~ 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this 2-3 day of January, 2015, at /~.'/(:JA.m.t::?, ~ 

OWEN M. PANNER 

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 

2 - TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER 

Case 1:15-cv-00108-MC Document 11 Filed 01/23/15 Page 2 of 2
#### J. C. Burwell, Inc. *v.*Lorraine Miles et al. Alfred L. Messenger, Jr. *v.*Lorraine Miles et al.

*Nicholas B. Eddy,*for the plaintiffs (appellees).

*James N. Egan,*for the appellants (defendants).

Argued April 1

decided April 1, 1975

The plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss the appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Litchfield County is granted.
<PAGE>


                                                               Exhibit 99.1(vii)



March 28, 2001



Chase Global Trust - Chase 00-3 (442)
Andrew Cooper
450 W. 33rd St
New York, NY  10001




RE:  Annual Statement as to Compliance


Pursuant to that certain Loan Servicing Agreement ("Agreement") dated as of ,
Chase Funding Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2000-3, I, H. John
Berens, hereby certify that (I) a review of the activities of the Servicer
during the preceding year and the performance under this Agreement has been made
under my supervision, and (II) to the best of my knowledge, based on such
review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement for
such year.


Sincerely,


/s/ H. John Berens
------------------------------------
H. John Berens
Sr. Vice President, Loan Service



HJB/pr
cc: Mr. James L. Shreero
    Ms. Denise Desrosiers, Esq.
SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS FOR G

SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS FOR G

AMP SCIENCE PLANNING: 6/200

AMP SCIENCE PLANNING: 6/20

11/2005 11/2005

 OUTCOME: THESIS SENTENCE OU

OUTCOME: THESIS SENTENCE OU

OF SSP, CMP, RP, AWP OF SSP, CMP, RP, AWP

 KEY GROUPS: GCMRC, SPG, BAH

KEY GROUPS: GCMRC, SPG, BAH

 and TWG and TWG
JUNE

OUTCOM

OUTCOM

SA TASK APPR

SA TASK APPR

PROSPECTUS PROSPECTUSWORK PLAN WORK PLANSCHEDULE (S) SCHEDULE (S)KEY ELEMENT

KEY ELEMENT

SSP, CMP, RP SSP, CMP, RP

INFORMATION 

INFORMATION 

MEETINGS MEETINGS

9; GCMRC, SA 9; GCMRC, SA20; GCMRC, SA 20; GCMRC, SA21/22; TWG 21/22; TWG22/24; SPG, GCMRC, SA 22/24; SPG, GCMRC, SA
JULY

OUTCOM

OUTCOM

 WORK PLAN WORK PLANSSP SENTENC

SSP SENTENC

OUTLINE DRAFT OUTLINE DRAFTCMP EXPANDE

CMP EXPANDE

ELEMENTS ELEMENTSRP KNOWLEDG

RP KNOWLEDG

ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT

MEETINGS MEETINGS

5/8; GCMRC, 5/8; GCMRC, SCIENTISTS, SCIENTISTS, MANAGERS, SA MANAGERS, SA13/15; GCMRC; SA 13/15; GCMRC; SA27/28; SPG, GCMRC, SA 27/28; SPG, GCMRC, SA
AUGUST

OUTCOME

OUTCOME

RP EXPANDED RP EXPANDED ELEMENTS ELEMENTSCMP SENTENC

CMP SENTENC

OUTLINE DRAFT OUTLINE DRAFTSSP REFINED 

SSP REFINED 

AMWG PROGR

AMWG PROGR

REPORT

MEETINGS MEETINGS

15/17; GCMRC, SA 15/17; GCMRC, SA30/31; AMWG, TWG, 30/31; AMWG, TWG, GCMRC, SPG, BAHG, GCMRC, SPG, BAHG, SA
SEPTEMBER SEPTEMBER

OUTCOM

OUTCOM

CMP SENTENC

CMP SENTENC

OUTLINE DRAFT OUTLINE DRAFT REFINED REFINEDRP SENTENCE RP SENTENCE OUTLINE DRAFT OUTLINE DRAFTAWP EXPANDE

AWP EXPANDE

ELEMENTS; 200

ELEMENTS; 200

BUDGET, 2009 E

BUDGET, 2009 E

MEETINGS MEETINGS

1/2; SPG, GCMRC, SA 1/2; SPG, GCMRC, SA14/16; GCMRC 14/16; GCMRC
OCTOBER OCTOBER

OUTCOME OUTCOM

RP SENTENCE O

RP SENTENCE O

DRAFT REFINED DRAFT REFINEDAWPSENTENCE O

AWPSENTENCE O

& BUDGET DRAFT & BUDGET DRAFTSCIENCE SYMPO

SCIENCE SYMPO

SA REVIEWS AND SA REVIEWS AND RECOMMENDATIO

RECOMMENDATIO

TWG REVIEW TWG REVIEW

MEETINGS MEETINGS

1/2; SPG, GCMRC, SA 1/2; SPG, GCMRC, SA25/27; GCMRC, SA, 25/27; GCMRC, SA, SCIENTISTS, MANAGERS SCIENTISTS, MANAGERS28GCMRC, 28GCMRC, SAs

?; SPG, GCMRC, SA ?; SPG, GCMRC, SA
NOVEMBER NOVEMBER

OUTCOM

OUTCOM

REFINED REFINED INs KNOWLED

KNOWLED

ASSESSMENT/R

ASSESSMENT/R

CMPTWG REVIEW O

TWG REVIEW O

PLANS

MEETINGS MEETINGS

8/9; SPG, GCMRC, SA 8/9; SPG, GCMRC, SA?; TWG,GCMRC, SA ?; TWG,GCMRC, SA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

PORTLAND DIVISION 

JENNIFER MEACHAM, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

LIN TELEVISION CORPORATION, a foreign 

corporation doing business as KOIN Local 6, 

Defendant. 

ACOSTA, Magistrate Judge: 

Case No. 3:15-cv-1849-AC 

JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL 

Based on the Notice of Settlement and Stipulation of Dismissal of Dismissal with Prejudice 

filed by the parties on July 8, 2016, the court finds this case has been fully compromised and settled. 

Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED and ADJUDGED that: (1) this action is DISMISSED with prejudice and 

PAGE 1 - JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL 

Case 3:15-cv-01849-AC Document 27 Filed 07/21/16 Page 1 of 2
without costs to any party; (2) pending motions, if any, are DENIED as moot; and (3) all scheduling 

dates shall be vacated and stricken from the calendar. 

DATED this 21" day of July, 2016. 

/"JQHN V. ACOSTA 

U~ited/States Magistrate Judge ,J 

PAGE 2 - JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL 

Case 3:15-cv-01849-AC Document 27 Filed 07/21/16 Page 2 of 2