alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 10.75

[LCC LETTERHEAD]



November 7, 1996

MCI Telecommunications Corporation
1801 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20006
Attn.:  Mr. William Armistead

Re   Subordination and Intercreditor Agreement, dated as of September 30,
     1996, among The Chase Manhattan Bank ("Chase"), MCI
     Telecommunications Corporation ("MCI"), and LCC International, Inc.
     ("LCC") (the "Intercreditor Agreement").

Dear Mr. Armistead:

This is to confirm our recent discussions with respect to the Intercreditor
Agreement. (All terms not defined in this letter shall have the meaning given to
them in the Intercreditor Agreement.)

MCI hereby agrees that (i) the maximum aggregate principal amount of Debt which
the Company may incur under the Senior Note Documents shall be increased from
$20,000,000 to $60,000,000 and (ii) the Intercreditor Agreement shall be amended
hereby in all respects to reflect such permitted increase including, without
limitation, by substituting the amount of $60,000,000 for the amount of
$20,000,000 in each place where such amount appears in Section 4 thereof.

In addition, MCI hereby acknowledges that the Company has entered into
preliminary negotiations with lenders (e.g., NationsBank, N.A.) to replace the
Chase credit facility with a new credit facility in the principal amount of
$60,000,000. MCI agrees that, upon request by the Company, MCI shall enter into
a new intercreditor agreement with the Company and any other party designated by
the Company (the "New Intercreditor Agreement") on substantially the same terms
set forth in the Intercreditor Agreement, as amended by this letter, provided
that the Intercreditor Agreement shall terminate on or prior to the effective
date of the New Intercreditor Agreement.
<PAGE>   2

Please indicate MCI's consent to the foregoing by executing this letter and the
enclosed copy in the space provided below. Kindly return one fully executed copy
to me for the Company's files.

Thank you for your continued cooperation with respect to these matters.

Sincerely,

/s/ RICHARD HOZIK

Richard Hozik
Senior Vice President 
  & Chief Financial Officer

Acknowledged and Agreed to this 7th day of November, 1996.

MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION

By:  /s/ WILLIAM S. ARMISTEAD
   ----------------------------
Name:  William S. Armistead
     --------------------------
Title:  Vice President
      -------------------------
#### Edward T. ARAKAKI, and Helen Arakaki, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 06-5109.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 17, 2007.

R. Patrick Jaress, Jaress & Leong, of Honolulu, HI, argued for plaintiffs-appellants.

Steven M. Mager, Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General; Jeanne E. Davidson, Director; and Kathryn A. Bleecker, Assistant Director.

*1004Before LOURIE, LINN, and MOORE, Circuit Judges.

Judgment

PER CURIAM.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
EXHIBIT 23.01



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the incorporation by reference in each of the following Registration Statements of Caraustar Industries, Inc. and in each related Prospectus of our report
dated February 6, 2004, with respect to the financial statements of Standard Gypsum LP, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 2003.



|                           |  |                                              
|-------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------
|Registration Statement No. |  | Purpose                                      
|No. 33-53726               |  | Registration Statement on Form S-8           
|No. 33-77682               |  | Registration Statement on Form S-8           
|No. 333-02948              |  | Registration Statement on Form S-8           
|No. 333-57965              |  | Registration Statement on Form S-8           
|No. 333-37168              |  | Registration Statement on Form S-8           
|No. 333-65555              |  | Registration Statement on Form S-3           
|No. 333-66943              |  | Post-Effective Amendment Number 1 on Form S-3
|No. 333-31618              |  | Registration Statement on Form S-4           
|No. 333-106062             |  | Registration Statement on Form S-8           
|No. 333-106064             |  | Registration Statement on Form S-8           



/s/
ERNST & YOUNG LLP



Austin, Texas

January 13, 2005
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.03

                        Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements of
Caraustar Industries, Inc. (Form S-8, No. 33-77682, Form S-8 No. 33-53726, Form
S-8 No. 333-02948, Form S-8 No. 333-57965, Form S-8 No. 333-37168, Form S-3 No.
333-66943, Form S-3 No. 333-65555, and Form S-4 No. 333-31618) of our report
dated May 24, 2002 with respect to the financial statements of Smurfit
Industrial Packaging Group for the year ended December 31, 2001, incorporated
by reference in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Caraustar Industries for the
year ended December 31, 2002.

                                             /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Saint Louis, Missouri
March 28, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                          158,889
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   41,822
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                222,211
<PP&E>                          16,450,047
<DEPRECIATION>                  4,905,717
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  12,514,876
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           396,513
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        0
<OTHER-SE>                      0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    12,514,876
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                1,532,633
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   2,052,434
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                15,550
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              329,756
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (535,351)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (535,351)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   0
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF FIRST INDUSTRIAL SECURITIES, L.P. FOR THE NINE MONTHS
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             522
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      394
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (100)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   816
<PP&E>                                          87,116
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (8,721)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  80,885
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,717
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      78,418
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    80,885
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,011
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  (2,466)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,455)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,090
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,090
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,016
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### In re: Jose Aleman FIGUEREO, Petitioner.

No. 06-5073.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted Under Rule 21, Fed. R.App. Pro.

Filed: Feb. 23, 2007.

*159See also 117 Fed.Appx. 208, 2007 WL 419516.

Jose Aleman Figuereo, Miami, FL, pro se.

Before: SCIRICA, Chief Judge, WEIS and GARTH, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Jose Aleman Figuereo, a prisoner at the Federal Correctional Institution at Miami, Florida, petitions this Court for a writ of mandamus ordering the United States District Court for the District of the Virgin Islands to act upon his habeas corpus petition, which was filed in the District Court on August 8, 2005. At the time of the filing of the mandamus petition, the District Court had not decided the habeas petition. However, on February 1, 2007, the District Court issued an order dismissing the habeas petition. Therefore, we will deny the petition for a writ of mandamus as moot.
#### In the Matter of Harry Rivera, Respondent, v Walter R. Kelly, as Superintendent of Attica Correctional Facility, et al., Appellants.

— Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law, and petition dismissed *(see, Matter of Crawford v Kelly,*124 AD2d 1018). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J. — art 78.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Denman, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.
##### 



Exhibit 10.27
 
  
    Separation Date
 Payment of Final Wages
 Additional Performance Payment
 Additional Health Benefits
 Acknowledgment of Consideration:
 6 6 6 6




---



##### 



Consulting Agreement
 Transmeta Property and Proprietary Information
 Release of Claims
  6 6 6 6




---



##### 



Indemnity
 Cooperation
 No Admission of Liability
 Nondisparagement
 Entire Agreement
 6 6 6 6




---



##### 



Review of Agreement
   Very truly yours,TRANSMETA CORPORATIONBy:
    
    /s/ John OHara HorsleyJohn OHara HorsleyExecutive Vice President,General Counsel & SecretaryREAD, UNDERSTOOD AND AGREEDDate: 5/19/06
    
    
    
    /s/ Mark R. KentMark R. Kent
   6 6 6 6




---



##### 



CONSULTING AGREEMENT
  RECITALS
   AGREEMENT
  1. Services.
 2. Term and Termination.
 3. Compensation.
 Page 1 of 2




---



##### 



4. Expenses.
 5. Equipment and Support.
 6. Relationship of the Parties.
 7. Governing Law.
 CONSULTANT
    
    TRANSMETA CORPORATION/s/ Mark R. Kent
    
    /s/ Arthur L. SwiftMark R. Kent
    
    By Arthur L. Swift,President and Chief Executive OfficerDate: 5/19/06
    
    Date: 5/19/06
 Page 2 of 2
Bruce W. Brewer, OSB No. 925581

brucebrewerusdccases@gmail.com

PO Box 421

West Linn, OR 97068

503-621-6633

Attorney for Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON

BRITTANY JONES, Case No. 3:15-cv-00127-SI

Plaintiff, 

 ORDER (EAJA FEES)

vs.

COMMISSIONER,

of Social Security

Administration,

Defendant.

_____________________________________

Based upon the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that, pursuant to the

Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, an attorney fee in the amount of $9,008.84 is

awarded to Plaintiff. It is ordered that the aforementioned attorney fee will be paid to Plaintiff’s

attorney, dependent upon verification that Plaintiff has no debt which qualifies for offset against

the awarded fees, pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff, 130

S.Ct. 2521 (2010). If Plaintiff has no such debt, then the check shall be made payable to

Plaintiff’s attorney, Bruce Brewer, and mailed to Plaintiff’s attorney’s mailing address at

PO Box 421, West Linn, OR 97068. If Plaintiff has such debt, then the check for any remaining

1 - ORDER FOR EAJA FEES

Case 3:15-cv-00127-SI Document 34 Filed 05/16/16 Page 1 of 2
funds after offset of the debt shall be made payable to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff's attorney's

mailing address stated above. There are no costs or expenses to be paid herein.

DATED this _____ day of ______________________, 2016.

____________________________________

The Honorable Michael H. Simon

United States District Court Judge 

Submitted by:

Bruce W. Brewer, OSB No. 925581

503-621-6633, Attorney for Plaintiff 

2 - ORDER FOR EAJA FEES

16th May

/s/ Michael H. Simon

Case 3:15-cv-00127-SI Document 34 Filed 05/16/16 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6669

DOREK EMANUEL HAYES, 

 Petitioner - Appellant, 

v. 

HAROLD W. CLARKE, 

 Respondent - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District 

Judge. (2:13-cv-00380-RAJ-DEM) 

Submitted: July 24, 2014 Decided: July 29, 2014

Before FLOYD and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior

Circuit Judge. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Dorek Emanuel Hayes, Appellant Pro Se. John Watkins Blanton, 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, 

for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Dorek Emanuel Hayes seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Hayes has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Pest Management Research: Sidney, MT
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    NPARL
                        Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory
                                    Agricultural Systems Research Unit
                                    Grasshoppers: Their Biology, Identification and ManagementSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Sidney, Montana Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory Pest Management Research PMRU Docs Grasshoppers: Their Biology, Identification and Management: Outbreak and Survey Info





- NPARL Home
- PMRU Home
- ASRU Home
- Site Highlights
- Outbreak and Survey Info
- ID Tools | Apps
- Grasshopper Management
- IPM Handbook
- USDA Research | Contact Info

Outbreak Info: 2019 Rangeland Hazard Mapheadline bar  Return to Outbreak Info


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND FOR THE TWELVE MONTH
PERIOD  ENDED  DECEMBER  31, 1997 WHICH ARE  INCLUDED IN THE  REGISTRANT'S  FORM
10-KSB  AND  IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO  SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001016439
<NAME>                        Intelligroup, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         8,391,000
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  17,668,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   799,000
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               34,695,000
<PP&E>                                         3,366,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 635,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 38,668,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,984,000
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       120,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     32,342,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   38,668,000
<SALES>                                        80,189,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               80,189,000
<CGS>                                          55,976,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  55,976,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               18,041,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               765,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                6,510,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2,039,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            4,471,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   4,471,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .38


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1999, AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          13,739
<SECURITIES>                                    53,274
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,373
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,828
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,030,350
<DEPRECIATION>                                 503,321
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,409,221
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,436,377
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                   (241,042)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,409,221
<SALES>                                        404,454
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               404,454
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  346,109
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,353
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              93,079
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (29,871)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (29,871)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  76,232
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    46,361
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
732 A.2d 1200

#### In the Matter of William John TANCREDI.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

July 8, 1999.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 8th day of July, 1999, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated May 17, 1999, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.