alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Caremark Rx, Inc. (the Corporation) for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certifies that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 9, 2006                                   
|                                                    
|/s/ Peter J. Clemens IV                             
|Peter J. Clemens IV                                 
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Reny Rivero, Respondent, v Spillane Enterprises, Corp., Doing Business as McDonald’s Restaurant, Appellant.

[943 NYS2d 235]-

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (McMahon, J.), dated June 30, 2011, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.

At approximately 9:40 p.m. on May 5, 2009, the plaintiff allegedly was injured at a McDonald’s Restaurant on Staten Island owned by the defendant. Specifically, the plaintiff had purchased a yogurt at the counter and asked the counter worker where the restroom was located. The worker pointed to the direction of the restroom and, as the defendant walked to a nearby table on which to place his yogurt container, he slipped and fell on a damp floor which had been mopped by an employee shortly before the occurrence. At the time of the occurrence, a wet floor sign was in place in the area where the plaintiff fell. The Supreme Court denied the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

A property owner has a duty to maintain its property in a reasonably safe condition, which “may also include the duty to warn of a dangerous condition” *(Cupo v Karfunkel,*1 AD3d 48, *98551 [2003]). A property owner, however, has no duty to protect or warn against an open and obvious condition that is not inherently dangerous *(see Atehortua v Lewin,*90 AD3d 794 [2011], *lv denied*18 NY3d 811 [2012]; *Surujnaraine v Valley Stream Cent. High School Dist.,*88 AD3d 866 [2011]; *Katz v Westchester County Healthcare Corp.,*82 AD3d 712, 713 [2011]).

On this record, it cannot be determined as a matter of law that the damp floor upon which the plaintiff slipped and fell was open and obvious, and not inherently dangerous, so as to relieve the defendant of its duty to warn of the hazard *(see Cook v Consolidated Edison Co. of NY, Inc.,*51 AD3d 447, 448 [2008]). However, the defendant established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that it satisfied its duty to warn of a potentially dangerous condition by placing a warning sign in the area where the plaintiff fell *(see Hammond v International Paper Co.,*161 AD2d 914, 915 [1990]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact *(see generally Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). Dillon, J.P., Florio, Chambers and Roman, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 166 (Tuesday, August 31, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 48669]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-18692]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID: 0648-XB374]


Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC); Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council will hold a 
webinar workshop to demonstrate electronic vessel trip reporting (eVTR) 
through an approved software application in preparation for required 
commercial electronic reporting.

DATES: The workshop will be held via webinar on Wednesday, September 
15, 2021, beginning at 5 p.m. and concluding by 7 p.m. For details, see 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

ADDRESSES: This workshop will be held via webinar and connection and 
agenda information will be posted at the MAFMC's website: https://www.mafmc.org/council-events.
    Council address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N 
State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 674-2331; 
www.mafmc.org.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D., Executive 
Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, telephone: (302) 
526-5255.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is the first of several Council-hosted 
eVTR training workshops open to the public and targeted towards 
commercial operators. Beginning on November 10, 2021, all commercial 
vessels with federal permits for species managed by the Mid-Atlantic or 
New England Council will be required to submit vessel trip reports 
(VTRs) electronically as eVTRs within 48 hours of the end of a trip 
(unless required sooner as with some sector allocations). This action 
does not change any other existing requirements associated with VTRs. 
These changes were recommended by the MAFMC and NEFMC in order to 
increase the timeliness and availability of data submitted through 
VTRs, reduce the reporting burden on commercial vessel operators, and 
increase the accuracy and quality of data. The training workshop will 
review step by step instructions for filling out an eVTR using an 
approved software application.

Special Accommodations

    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Shelley Spedden at the Mid-Atlantic Council 
Office, (302) 526-5253, at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.
    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: August 25, 2021.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-18692 Filed 8-30-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
# L_2009185EN.01002301.xml

| 17.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 185/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 185/23

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 16 July 2009

appointing a new Member of the Commission of the European Communities

(2009/552/EC, Euratom)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular the second paragraph of Article 215 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular the second paragraph of Article 128 thereof,

Whereas:

in a letter dated 5 July 2009, Mr Louis MICHEL resigned from his post as a Member of the Commission with effect from 14 July 2009. He should be replaced for the remainder of his term of office,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Mr Karel De GUCHT is hereby appointed a Member of the Commission for the period from 17 July 2009 to 31 October 2009.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on 17 July 2009.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 16 July 2009.

For the Council

The President

C. BILDT

---
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

June 7, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00079

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF E.J.M.K., A CHILD

,

Appellant

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018PA00825 Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s court

- appointed attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California

, 368 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he asserts there are no meritorious issues to raise on appeal. Counsel has informed the appellant of her right to file her own brief and provided appellant with a form motion for requesting the appellate record. See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319

- 20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); Nichols v. State , 954 S.W.2d 83, 85 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State , 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1996, no pet.); see also In re R.R. , No. 04

- 03

- 00096

- CV, 2003 WL 21157944, at * 4 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio May 21, 2003, no pet.) (applying Anders procedure in appeal from termination of parental rights). The State has filed a letter waiving its right to file an appellee’s brief unless the appellant files a pro se brief.

If the appellant desires to file a pro se brief, she must do so within twenty days from the date of th is order. See Bruns , 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1. If the appellant files a pro se brief, the State may file a responsive brief no later than twenty days after the date the appellant’s pro se brief is filed in this court. We ORDER the motion to withdraw, filed by appellant’s counsel, to be HELD IN ABEYANCE pending further order of the court.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 7th day of June, 2019

.___________________________________ K eith E. H ottle

, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 99.2



CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Gorham Rutter, Jr., the President/CEO of Pelican Properties, International
Corp., a Florida corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(2)           to my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the
              Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 (the
              "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
              15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ; and

(2) to my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  August 14, 2002.


                                            /s/   Gorham Rutter, Jr
                                           ---------------------------------
                                           Gorham Rutter, Jr., President/CEO
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2099 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2099

       To provide for enhanced Federal sentencing guidelines for 
            counterfeiting offenses, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 20, 1998

 Mr. Campbell introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To provide for enhanced Federal sentencing guidelines for 
            counterfeiting offenses, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SENTENCING GUIDELINES FOR COUNTERFEITING OFFENSES.

    The United States Sentencing Commission shall amend the Federal 
sentencing guidelines to provide--
            (1) a sentencing enhancement of not less than 2 levels, 
        with respect to the base level for offenses involving 
        counterfeit bearer obligations of the United States, as 
        described in section 2B5.1 of the Federal sentencing 
        guidelines; and
            (2) an additional sentencing enhancement of not less than 2 
        levels, with respect to any offense described in paragraph (1) 
        that involves the use of a computer printer or a color 
        photocopying machine.
                                 <all>
```
#### Jackie E. ROBINSON, Claimant-Appellant, v. R. James NICHOLSON, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 2007-7079.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

June 28, 2007.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of Jackie E. Robinson’s unopposed motion to dismiss his appeal,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted.

(2) All sides shall bear their own costs.
#### Angel Corp, as Parent and Natural Guardian of Tomianne Corp, an Infant, Respondent, v Matthew R. Ratajczak, Appellant, and Michael Muscato et al., Respondents.

[944 NYS2d 713]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Joseph R. Glownia, J.), entered February 9, 2011 in a personal injury action. The order denied the motion of defendant Matthew R. Ratajczak for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present — Scudder, EJ., Fahey, Lindley and Martoche, JJ.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
                 Pursuant to 18 United States Code Section 1350

      The undersigned hereby certifies that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 of Apogent Technologies Inc. (the
"Company") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

                                          /s/ Dennis Brown
                                          ----------------
                                          Dennis Brown
                                          Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer
                                          December 14, 2004


      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
      been provided to Fisher Scientific International Inc. and will be retained
      by it and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.

      This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for
      purposes of the Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1800 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1800

 To require the Commissioner of Social Security to update the medical-
        vocational guidelines used in disability determinations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 15, 2015

Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas (for himself, Mrs. Black, Mr. Reed, Mrs. Mimi 
Walters of California, and Mr. Marchant) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Commissioner of Social Security to update the medical-
        vocational guidelines used in disability determinations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Guiding Responsible and Improved 
Disability Decisions Act of 2015'' or the ``GRIDD Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. UPDATING OF MEDICAL-VOCATIONAL GUIDELINES.

    As soon as possible after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the Commissioner of Social Security shall prescribe rules and 
regulations that update the medical-vocational guidelines, as set forth 
in appendix 2 to subpart P of part 404 of title 20, Code of Federal 
Regulations, used in disability determinations, including full 
consideration of new employment opportunities made possible by advances 
in treatment, rehabilitation, and technology and full consideration of 
the effect of prevalent languages on education.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOUND IN THE COMPANY'S
FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          20,544
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  162,615
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (4,150)
<INVENTORY>                                     50,498
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               275,431
<PP&E>                                         227,319
<DEPRECIATION>                                (38,587)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 929,383
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          211,665
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            90
<OTHER-SE>                                     237,947
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   929,383
<SALES>                                        739,467
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               739,467
<CGS>                                          608,518
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  608,518
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                59,693
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,267
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 50,989
<INCOME-TAX>                                    20,933
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             26,667
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (643)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,024
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.37
        

</TABLE>
#### Mary A. C. Flynn, Respondent, v Daniel M. Flynn, Appellant.

Special Term properly denied the defendant’s motion to vacate the order entered October 13, 1982. That order was superseded by the judgment of divorce *(see, Schapiro v Schapiro,*27 AD2d 667) and was of no effect after entry of the judgment *(see, Mittman v Mittman,*263 App Div 384; *Kellogg v Stoddard,*89 App Div 137). His further argument that the failure to comply with what he claims to have been an invalid pendente lite order had a prejudicial impact on the trial court’s custody determination provides no basis for vacating the pendente lite order. Such an argument might have been cognizable on direct appeal from the judgment. However, by order dated January 24, 1986, the defendant’s appeal from the judgment was dismissed for failure to perfect the same. Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

M EMORANDUM O RDER ON M OTION FOR E N B ANC R ECONSDIERATION

Appellate case name: Suran Wije v. David A. Burns, The University of Texas at Austin, Jane Doe, and John Doe

Appellate case number: 01

- 19

- 00024

- CV

Trial court case number: D

- 1

- GN

- 18

- 002435

Trial court: 201st District Court of Travis County

The motion for en banc reconsideration filed January 19, 2021 , is D ENIED

. It is so
ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

_

/s/ Richard Hightower

__________ _________________ Acting for the Court

Date: _ A pril 6, 2021

_______

The en banc court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Kelly, Goodm an, Landau, Hightower, Countiss, Rivas

- Molloy, Guerra, and Farris.
EXHIBIT 23.2

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-18981, 333-18983, 333-18985, 333-18987,
333-18989, 333-29153, 333-63493, 333-36646, 333-46126 and 333-67710 all on Form S-8 of SRS Labs, Inc.,
of our report dated March 15, 2002, appearing in SRS Labs, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 2003.

Deloitte &
Touche LLP

Costa
Mesa, California
March 26, 2004

---

QuickLinks
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 10.8

                            FOURTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE



                  THIS AGREEMENT, dated as of the 5TH day of March, 1996, by
and between THE NICHOLS COMPANY, agent for SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.,
("Landlord") and MARIS EQUIPMENT COMPANY, ("Tenant").

                                   WITNESSETH:

                  WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant entered into an Agreement of
Lease dated July 23, 1986 (which together with the Lease Amendment Agreement
dated January 13, 1992, Second Amendment to Lease dated May 29, 1992, and the
Third Amendment to Lease) are herein referred to as the "Lease", for Premises
situated in the Whiteland Business Park, 110 Summit Drive, West Whiteland
Township, Exton, Pennsylvania totalling 21,580 Square Feet, said Premises being
more particularly described in said Lease, and

                  WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to amend the lease by
modifying certain provisions thereof as hereinafter set forth.

                  NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants
herein contained and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties hereto
agree as follows:

                  1. The Term of said Lease is hereby extended for a period of
three (3) years so as to expire on April 30,1999.

                  2. Effective May 1, 1996 the annual Base Rent as set forth in
Section 1 of said Lease shall be changed to $151,060.00, all such Base Rent
to be payable in equal monthly installments of $12,588.33 at the same time and
in the same manner as provided in said Lease for Base Rent payments.

                  3. Except as modified hereby, all terms and provisions of said
Lease shall continue in full force and effect, all of which are hereby ratified
and confirmed.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Fourth
Amendment to be executed the day and year first above written.


(CORPORATE SEAL)                             THE NICHOLS COMPANY, Agent for
                                             SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.,
                                             Landlord

ATTEST:_______________________               BY:___________________________


(CORPORATE SEAL)                             MARIS EQUIPMENT COMPANY,
                                             Tenant


ATTEST:_______________________               BY:___________________________






                                       -1-