alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Athens, Georgia
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home People & Locations







Ariane  Randall
                        Location Support Staff

                        




                        
                        Animal Caretaker
                        Phone: (706) 546-3715
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Samuel Robert Queen, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

Conrad Graber, 

Respondent.

No. CV-14-01135-PHX-PGR (ESW)

ORDER 

 Petitioner is incarcerated in the Federal Correctional Institution in Sheridan, 

Oregon. On May 27, 2014, Petitioner filed a Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 for a Writ 

of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody (Doc. 1). At the time he filed his 

Petition, Petitioner filed a “Motion for Default Judgment against Respondent F.R.C.P. 

12(A)” (Doc. 17). Respondent filed his Opposition to Motion for Default Judgment on 

December 31, 2014 (Doc. 19). Respondent’s Answer was filed on December 9, 2014 

(Doc. 14). Respondent was served on November 19, 2014 (Doc. 10, 12). 

 Pursuant to the Court’s Order of November 17, 2014 (Doc. 9), Respondent had 20 

days from the date of service to file an Answer to the Petition. The Court finds that 

Respondent timely filed his Answer. Therefore, the “Motion for Default Judgment 

against Respondent F.R.C.P. 12(A)” (Doc. 17) is denied. 

 Dated this 15th day of January, 2015. 

Honorable Eileen S. Willett

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:15-cv-00916-AA Document 20 Filed 01/16/15 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case 3:15-cv-00916-AA Document 20 Filed 01/16/15 Page 2 of 2
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1736 

To amend the Clean Air Act with respect to the ethanol waiver for the 

Reid vapor pressure limitations under such Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 13, 2015 

Mr. SMITH of Nebraska (for himself, Mr. BUCK, Mr. RODNEY DAVIS of Illinois, and Mrs. NOEM) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Clean Air Act with respect to the ethanol 

waiver for the Reid vapor pressure limitations under 

such Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ETHANOL WAIVER. 

4 Section 211(h)(4) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 

5 7545(h)(4)) is amended— 

6 (1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), 

7 by inserting ‘‘or more’’ after ‘‘10 percent’’; and 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1736 IH

1 (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘additional 

2 alcohol or’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON

ROBIN L. MORTON,

Plaintiff,

v. 

COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY

ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant.

Case No. 6:15-cv-00080-KI

JUDGMENT

Drew L. Johnson

170 Valley River Dr.

Eugene, OR 97401

John E. Haapala, Jr.

401 E. 10th Ave., Ste. 240

Eugene, OR 97401

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Billy J. Williams

Acting United States Attorney

Janice E. Hebert

Page 1 - JUDGMENT
Assistant United States Attorney

1000 S.W. Third Ave., Ste. 600

Portland, OR 97201-2902

Jeffrey E. Staples

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Office of the General Counsel

Social Security Administration

701 Fifth Ave., Ste. 2900 M/S 221A

Seattle, WA 98104-7075

Attorneys for Defendant

KING, Judge:

Based on the record, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the decision of the

Commissioner is affirmed and this case is dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 9th day of December, 2015. 

 /s/ Garr M. King 

Garr M. King

United States District Judge

Page 2 - JUDGMENT
### The Honorable Charles R. Wolle, Chief Judge, United State s 1 

### District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. ___________ No. 95-3586

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Southern District of Iowa. David Henry Ritcherson, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: May 31, 1996 Filed: June 3, 1996

___________ Before McMILLIAN, WOLLMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. A jury found David Henry Ritcherson guilty of a drug offense, and we affirmed his conviction and sentence. United States v. Watts , 950 F.2d 50 8 (8th Cir. 1991), cert . denied , 503 U.S. 911, 943, 945 (1992). Ritcherson thenfiled this 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion alleging prior "forfeitures" o f Unite dStates currency constituted former jeopardy barring his dru g conviction. The district court denied Ritcherson's motion, an d Ritcherson 1 appeals. After de novo review of the record, we conclude Ritcherson's clai m is me ritless. First, there is no evidence showing that any forfeitur e proceeding occurred, or that Ritcherson contested the alleged forfeiture proceedings. Second, even assuming the currency

### -2-

was fo rfeited, Ritcherson's claim is foreclosed by United States v . $21,282.00 in U.S. Currency , 47 F.3d 972, 973 (8th Cir. 1995) ("[t]h e forfeiture of proceed s of criminal activity which `simply parts the owner from the fruits of th e criminal activity' does not constitute punishment" (quoted case omitted)), and by United States v. Clementi , 70 F.3d 997, 999
- 1000 (8th Cir. 1995) (rejecting analysis in United States v. $405,089.23 U.S. Currency , 33 F.3d 1210 (9th Cir. 1994), amended on denial of reh'g , 56 F.3d 4 1 (9th Cir. 1995), cert. granted , 116 S. Ct. 762 (1996), an d extend ing reasoning in $21,282.00 in U.S. Currencyto double jeopard y analysis). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1729 

To amend the Migratory Bird Treaty Act to exempt certain Alaskan Native 

articles from prohibitions against sale of items containing nonedible migratory bird parts, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 26, 2015 

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Migratory Bird Treaty Act to exempt certain 

Alaskan Native articles from prohibitions against sale 

of items containing nonedible migratory bird parts, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FROM PROHIBITIONS FOR ALAS4 KAN NATIVE ARTICLES CONTAINING MIGRA5 TORY BIRD PARTS. 

6 Section 2 of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 

7 U.S.C. 703) is amended by adding at the end the fol8 lowing: 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1729 IH

1 ‘‘(c) EXEMPTION FOR AUTHENTIC ALASKAN NATIVE

2 ARTICLES OF HANDICRAFT OR CLOTHING.— 

3 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other 

4 provisions of this Act, nothing in this Act prohibits 

5 possession, offering for sale, sale, offering to barter, 

6 barter, offering to purchase, purchase, delivery for 

7 shipment, shipment, causing to be shipped, delivered 

8 for transportation, transport or causing to be trans9 ported, carrying or causing to be carried, or receiv10 ing for shipment, transportation, or carriage, any 

11 authentic Alaskan Native article of handicraft or 

12 clothing on the basis that it contains a nonedible mi13 gratory bird part. 

14 ‘‘(2) LIMITATION.—This subsection shall not 

15 apply with respect to any handicraft or clothing con16 taining any part of a migratory bird that was taken 

17 in a wasteful manner. 

18 ‘‘(3) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection: 

19 ‘‘(A) ALASKAN NATIVE.—The term ‘Alas20 kan Native’ means any Indian, Aleut, or Es21 kimo who resides in Alaska. 

22 ‘‘(B) AUTHENTIC ALASKAN NATIVE ARTI23 CLE OF HANDICRAFT OR CLOTHING.—The term 

24 ‘authentic Alaskan Native article of handicraft 

25 or clothing’— 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1729 IH

1 ‘‘(i) means any item that is— 

2 ‘‘(I) composed wholly or in some 

3 significant respect of natural mate4 rials; and 

5 ‘‘(II) produced, decorated, or 

6 fashioned by an Alaskan Native, in 

7 the exercise of traditional Alaskan 

8 Native handicrafts, without the use of 

9 any pantograph or other mass copying 

10 device; and 

11 ‘‘(ii) includes any weaving, carving, 

12 stitching, sewing, lacing, beading, drawing, 

13 or painting described in clause (i), or any 

14 combination thereof.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 41178 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
JOHN ANTHONY MORADO , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:15

- CR

- 540

- 1

Before JONES, HIGGINSON, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent John Anthony Morado has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Morado h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief
and the rel evant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 7, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-41178 Document: 00515191256 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/07/2019No. 18

- 41178

2 appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further respo nsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 18-41178 Document: 00515191256 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/07/2019
# C_2006193EN.01003501.xml

| 17.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 193/35 |
| --------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | -------- |

---

Appointment of members of the Conciliation Body instituted by Commission Decision 94/442/EC of 1 July 1994 setting up a conciliation procedure in the context of the clearance of the accounts of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) Guarantee Section

(2006/C 193/09)

| (1) | The Commission has renewed the term of office of:
Mr José Luis SAENZ GARCIA-BAQUERO (ES) (from 1 August 2006 to 31 July 2007). | | Mr José Luis SAENZ GARCIA-BAQUERO (ES) (from 1 August 2006 to 31 July 2007). |
| --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| | Mr José Luis SAENZ GARCIA-BAQUERO (ES) (from 1 August 2006 to 31 July 2007). | | |

| (2) | The Commission has appointed as members:
—
Mr Peter BAUMANN (DA) (from 1 August 2006 to 31 July 2009); —
Mr Daniel PERRIN (FR) (from 1 August 2006 to 31 July 2009). | — | Mr Peter BAUMANN (DA) (from 1 August 2006 to 31 July 2009); | — | Mr Daniel PERRIN (FR) (from 1 August 2006 to 31 July 2009). |
| --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | - | ----------------------------------------------------------- | - | ----------------------------------------------------------- |
| — | Mr Peter BAUMANN (DA) (from 1 August 2006 to 31 July 2009); | | | | |
| — | Mr Daniel PERRIN (FR) (from 1 August 2006 to 31 July 2009). | | | | |

| (3) | The Commission has appointed as substitute members:
—
Mr Robert BURIAN (A) (from 1 August 2006); —
Mr Eduardo DIEZ PATIER (ES) (from 1 August 2006). | — | Mr Robert BURIAN (A) (from 1 August 2006); | — | Mr Eduardo DIEZ PATIER (ES) (from 1 August 2006). |
| --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | - | ------------------------------------------ | - | ------------------------------------------------- |
| — | Mr Robert BURIAN (A) (from 1 August 2006); | | | | |
| — | Mr Eduardo DIEZ PATIER (ES) (from 1 August 2006). | | | | |

---
Order entered January 20, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01505-CV

DALLAS NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant

V.

CALITEX CORP., ELSHIR ENTERPRISES, L.P. AND THOMAS, L.P., Appellees

On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-11-14157

ORDER

Before the Court are two January 8, 2015 motions of appellees Calitex Corporation, 

Elshir Enterprises, L.P., and Thomas, L.P.: (1) “Motion for Leave to File Motion to Show Cause 

in Trial Court” and (2) “Motion to Dismiss Appeal.” Specifically, appellees seek leave from this 

Court to file a “Motion for Contempt of Court or, in the Alternative, Motion to Show Cause” in 

the trial court “so a hearing may be conducted on the whereabouts of an $812,861.34 certificate 

of deposit deposited into the registry of the Dallas County Clerk in lieu of a supersedeas bond” in 

this case. Additionally, appellees seek “the extraordinary relief of dismissal of the instant appeal 

in an effort to mitigate further irreparable harm to the [a]ppellees.” 

Appellant has filed responses opposing both motions of appellees. Appellant contends in 

part that rule 24.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure “provides an appropriate remedy 
for [a]ppellees” and “does not require leave of the court of appeals.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 24.3. 

Further, appellant asserts “[a]ppellees cite no authority for the proposition that this Court can, or 

should, dismiss an appeal because a Receiver has, in accordance with the order of the court 

appointing him, withdrawn security posted in lieu of a supersedeas bond.” 

“Any litigant may appeal without superseding the trial court’s judgment, but the mere 

pendency of an appeal does not stay enforcement of the judgment.” Tex. Ass’n of Bus. v. Tex. 

Air Control Bd., 852 S.W.2d 440, 449 (Tex. 1993). Unless the law or the rules of appellate 

procedure provide otherwise, a judgment debtor may supersede the judgment by, among other 

methods, “making a deposit with the trial court clerk in lieu of a bond.” TEX. R. APP. P. 24.1. 

We note Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 24.3(a) provides,

(a) Continuing Jurisdiction. Even after the trial court’s plenary power expires, the 

trial court has continuing jurisdiction to do the following:

(1) order the amount and type of security and decide the sufficiency of 

sureties; and

(2) if circumstances change, modify the amount or type of security 

required to continue the suspension of a judgment’s execution.

TEX. R. APP. P. 24.3(a) (emphasis original).

Appellees do not address rule 24.3(a) or explain why, in light of that rule, they require 

leave of this Court to pursue appropriate relief in the trial court. See id. Further, appellees cite 

no authority, and we have found none, supporting their position that dismissal of this appeal is 

appropriate on the facts alleged by them. 

We DENY appellees’ January 8, 2015 “Motion for Leave to File Motion to Show Cause 

in Trial Court” and “Motion to Dismiss Appeal.” 

/s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG 

JUSTICE
IIB 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1755 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 1, 2015 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To amend title 36, United States Code, to make certain 

improvements in the congressional charter of the Disabled American Veterans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1755 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. CONGRESSIONAL CHARTER OF DISABLED 

2 AMERICAN VETERANS. 

3 (a) PURPOSES.—Section 50302 of title 36, United 

4 States Code, is amended— 

5 (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by 

6 striking ‘‘The purposes of the corporation are—’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘The corporation is organized exclu8 sively for charitable and educational purposes. The 

9 purposes of the corporation shall include—’’; 

10 (2) in paragraph (6), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

11 end; 

12 (3) by redesignating paragraph (7) as para13 graph (9); and 

14 (4) by inserting after paragraph (6) the fol15 lowing new paragraphs: 

16 ‘‘(7) to educate the public about the sacrifices 

17 and needs of disabled veterans; 

18 ‘‘(8) to educate disabled veterans about the 

19 benefits and resources available to them; and’’. 

20 (b) DISSOLUTION.—Chapter 503 of such title is 

21 amended by adding at the end the following new section: 

22 ‘‘§ 50309. Dissolution 

23 ‘‘On dissolution or final liquidation of the corpora24 tion, any assets remaining after the discharge or satisfac25 tory provision for the discharge of all liabilities shall be 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 1755 RFS 

1 transferred to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs for the 

2 care of disabled veterans.’’. 

3 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

4 at the beginning of chapter 503 of such title is amended 

5 by inserting after the item relating to section 50308 the 

6 following: 

‘‘50309. Dissolution.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 30, 

2015. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
ACCEPTED 01-15-00944-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 11/19/2015 12:11:23 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK
#### Nicole A. Stern et al., Respondents, v Agency Rent-A-Car, Inc., Appellant.

The infant plaintiff suffered physical injuries when she cut her knee on a metal object that was protruding from within the interior of a vehicle that her father had rented from the defendant. The issue which we are asked to resolve on appeal is whether the plaintiffs sufficiently established that the infant suffered "serious injury” within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

*800The affidavits submitted by the plaintiffs fail to sufficiently demonstrate that the infant sustained serious injury so as to withstand the defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment *(see, Post v Broderick,*104 AD2d 977). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

DIVALL INSURED INCOME PROPERTIES 2

LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

Certification of Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Divall Insured Income Properties 2 Limited Partnership (the Company) certifies that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|                      |  |                                        |  |                                                               
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | THE PROVO GROUP, INC., General Partner
|                      |  |                                       
|Dated: March 11, 2008 |  | By                                     |  | /s/ Bruce A. Provo                                            
|                      |  |                                        |  | President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the
knowledge

standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
Arizona Game and Fish Commission Order 40 Language:

Changes to Lees Ferry regulations:

 I. GENERAL SPORT FISHING SEASONS.

A. Legal fish and daily bag and possession limits.

1. Trout

a. The Colorado River from Glen Canyon Dam to Marble Canyon Bridge (Lees Ferry)

the upstream end of the Paria Riffle, trout over 16 12 inches may not be possessed, 

the limit shall be 2 4 trout per day and 4 8 trout in possession. Trout taken from this 

area shall be killed and retained as part of the bag limit or immediately released.

b. The Colorado River from Marble Canyon Bridge (Lees Ferry) the upstream end of 

the Paria Riffle, to 21-Mile Rapids, including all tributaries within the Grand Canyon 

National Park, the limit shall be 6 trout per day and 8 trout in possession. Trout taken 

from these areas shall be killed and retained as part of the bag limit or immediately 

released. 

III. ARTIFICIAL LURES AND FLIES ONLY.

B. ...that portion of the Colorado River from Glen Canyon Dam to Marble Canyon 

Bridge (Lees Ferry) upstream end of the Paria Riffle in Coconino County,...