alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TWG Action Items:

• Scope, Strategic Plan & Issues (Feb. 4-5, 1999)

• Chaps 1-3 only of the 2000-2004 SP; deal with other

issues & incorporate whatever we need re: guidance

• Outline of rest of SP

• Get comments on scope to Scott Loveless by Tues (fax

801-524-4506 - Ofc of the Field Solicitor)

• B Moore will assist Scott in preparing answers to TWG

questions & send electronically

• J Wescoat (NRC) will send GCMRC Secretary a SP

reference list for distribution to the TWG

• Chairperson, Processes (Feb. 18)

• elect if possible

• re-description of responsibilities

• ask for nominations later (Feb. 23-24)

• roles & operating procedures (operating procedures)

• BHBF, Plan, Compliance (for 2-4d/44k w/ load following),

Funding 

• B Moore & T Morton offered to do a first draft for the

federal action for the programmatic

• Review BHBF Alternatives Assessment document &

recommend post-flood regime for 99 (Feb. 18, 1999)

(Lunch for interested parties on 2/16)

• Proposed action for Programmatic Compliance before

April, Section 7 Consultation starts Sept. 

2/18: BHBF Alternative Assessment

BOR drafts suggested alternative
• FY2000 Plan, Process (Feb. 23-24, 1999)

• tribal involvement

• TCD Plan

• Comments on Chap 4 due by COB Jan 18, to be included

in a revised draft & dist to TWG 2 weeks by Feb 9

• Lake Powell Split

• Chair of ad hoc committee (N Henderson) will take a draft

of the Lake Powell split and send it out for review by ad

hoc group by Feb 16 (similar to 2000 plan procedure)

• Review MO’s & IN’s (March 16-17 TWG Meeting)

• begin reprioritizing IN’s

• selective withdrawal included in MO/IN doc

• make sure they’re in line with SP

• start reviewing Recreation suggested revisions from last

year

• FY2001 Budget (by first part of April - final August)
UPCOMING MEETINGS

Feb 4-5: ADWR, Phx

Feb 16: lunch re: BHBF discussions

TWG Feb 18: GCNP at Albright (gatekeeper at Tusyan will be

notified; bring agenda or you will be charged $20 nonreimbursable)

Meeting with GCMRC/NRC afternoon of 2/18 for prelim input re: its

review of GCMRC 

Feb 23-24: ADWR, Phx

March TWG Meeting: March 16-17, 1999 (probably Embassy) 

• MO’s

• Cultural Presentation

• Review 2001 AMP budget

April 20-21: Phx

May 15-22 (tentative) AMWG River Trip (launch Sat 5/15)

TWG July 20, 1-4 p.m.

AMWG July 21-22

TWG July 22, 1-4 p.m.
AMP STEPS:

Authority

Guiding Document - SP

MO’s & IN’s

GCMRC LTMP & AP (projects, scheduling, budget)

Project Plans/ Study Plans

Annual Report to Congress

SCORE Reports

Research Reports

Develop Calendar of step for AMP Strategic Plans
#### Ruth E. WILLIS, Appellant, v. BESAM AUTOMATED ENTRANCE SYSTEMS, INC.; Marriott International, Inc., Appellees.

No. 05-5349.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit L.A.R. 34.1(a) June 14, 2007.

Filed: June 21, 2007.

Bernard M. Gross, Michael N. Borish, Law Offices of Bernard M. Gross Juniper & Market, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellant.

Eric A. Weiss, Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin, Carl D. Buchholz, III, Michael C. Gallagher, Rawle *&*Henderson, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellees.

*247Before: McKEE, STAPLETON, and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

McKEE, Circuit Judge.

Ruth E. Willis appeals the District Court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants, Besam Automated Entrance Systems, Inc. and Marriott International, Inc. Willis is challenging the court’s decision to preclude the testimony of her proposed expert, Ronald Panunto. For the reasons that follow, we will affirm.

Willis’s suit stems from an incident that occurred on May 18, 2003. Willis contends that she was injured by the automatic revolving door of the Marriott Wardman Park Hotel in Washington D.C. Since we are writing primarily for the parties, we need not reiterate the factual or procedural history of this case in detail.

In its thorough and well-reasoned opinion, the District Court clearly addressed the arguments Willis is making before us. *See Willis v. Besam,*2005 WL 2902494 (E.D.Pa. Nov.3, 2005). The District Court has accurately explained why it was appropriate to reject the expert report that is the focus of this appeal, and there is little we can add to what the District Court has already said.

Accordingly, we will affirm substantially for the reasons set forth by the District Court.
Updated: 1/11/21

GLEN CANYON DAM ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

TECHNICAL WORK GROUP MEETING

JANUARY 22, 2021 

WEBINAR

https://bor.webex.com/bor/j.php?MTID=m8a3c2fec127043f7044d27909350cf70

Phone #: 415-527-5035 Participant Passcode: 199 778 4887

Meeting Number: 199 778 4887 Meeting Password: TWG1

FINAL AGENDA

STARTS AT 8:30 a.m. Pacific Time

START

TIME

(Duration)

Friday, January 22, 2020

Topic, Presenter, and Purpose

8:30

Pacific 

Time

(:45) 

Welcome and Administrative: Seth Shanahan, Technical Work Group (TWG) Chair 

 Introductions and Determination of Quorum (16 members)

 Adoption of Prior Meeting Minutes 

 Next Meeting Date(s): April 13-14, 2021

 Ad Hoc Group Membership and Updates 

 Review Action Items, Motions, and Votes Form

 Update on Activities Impacted Due to COVID-19 Restrictions 

 Update on Monitoring and Research Trips to Occur From Today Until Next Meeting 

 Updates on Items of Interest That Are in Consideration for Implementation Before Next TWG 

Meeting

9:15

(:30)

Update on Hydrology, Operations, and Reservoir/Release Conditions: Heather Patno, Bureau of 

Reclamation (Reclamation)

 Presentation (15 minutes)

 Q&A and discussion (15 minutes)

9:45

(:15) 

Are There Important Resource Outcomes That Might be Expected From a Potential 7.48 Million 

Acre-Feet Release in WY2022?: TWG Discussion

 Discussion ( 15 minutes)

10:00

(:15)

BREAK

10:15

(:15)

Annual FY20 Reporting on Expenditures: Lee Traynham, Reclamation; and Mike Moran, Grand 

Canyon Monitoring and Research Center (GCMRC) 

 Presentation (10 minutes)

 Q&A and discussion (5 minutes)

10:30

(:30) 

Long-Term Experimental and Management Plan (LTEMP) Biological Opinion Conservation 

Measures Updates: Kerri Pedersen, Reclamation; and Mike Moran, GCMRC

 Presentation (15 minutes)

 Q&A and discussion (15 minutes)
Updated: 1/11/21

START

TIME

(Duration)

Friday, January 22, 2020

Topic, Presenter, and Purpose

11:00

(:30)

Discussion About Possible Experimental and Management Actions That May be Implemented in 

the Next 12 Months and Any Budgeting Issues: Lee Traynham, Reclamation; and Mike Moran, 

GCMRC

 Presentation (15 minutes)

 Q&A and discussion (15 minutes)

11:30

(:45) LUNCH

12:15

(:60) 

Potential Spring High Flow Experiment, Spring Disturbance Flow (i.e., FLAHG Hydrograph), Spring 

Overflight Flow Opportunity, and Bug Flows: Mike Moran, GCMRC; Ted Kennedy, GCMRC; and 

Clarence Fullard, Reclamation

 Presentation (30 minutes)

 Q&A and discussion (30 minutes)

1:15

(:30)

Incentivized Harvest Program Implementation Update: Ken Hyde, National Park Service (NPS)

 Presentation (15 minutes)

 Q&A and discussion (15 minutes)

1:45

(:15)

BREAK

2:00

(:90)

Annual Reporting is Over, Now What?: TWG Members

 Discussion of information gaps, modeling needs, monitoring metrics, mitigation opportunities, 

etc. (90 minutes)

3:30

(:30)

Discussion of Emerging Issues and Request for Agenda Items for Next Meeting: Seth Shanahan, 

TWG Chair

 Discussion (30 minutes)

4:00

(:05) 

Public Comment

4:05 ADJOURN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

v. 

AMMON BUNDY, et al., 

Defendants. 

Based upon the motion of the United States, 

3:16-CR-00051-BR 

ORDER TO UNSEAL REDACTED 

SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Superseding Indictment filed in the above-captioned 

matter is hereby UNSEALED as to defendants 1 through 25 only. 

Dated this q 't1t,. day of March 2016. 

Presented by: 

BILLY J. WILLIAMS, OSB #901366 

Unit tt 

ETHAN D. KNIGHT, OSB #9 

GEOFFREY A. BARROW 

CRAIG J. GABRIEL, OSB #01257 

Assistant United States Attorneys 

ANN�� 

United States District Judge 

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 281 Filed 03/09/16 Page 1 of 1
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Genetics and Animal Breeding: Clay Center, NE
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    USMARC Home
                    USMARC Research Units
                        Meat Safety & Quality
                                    Livestock Bio-Systems
                                    Nutrition, Growth and Physiology
                                    Animal Health GenomicsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Clay Center, Nebraska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center Genetics and Animal Breeding Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications
- IACUC Summaries

Collaborations The Genetics and Animal Breeding has a long and productive history of collaborative research involving stakeholders.  Current collaborators and projects:


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON

ANDREA OLSON Case No.: 3:15−cv−02216−HZ

Plaintiff(s),

v. ORDER CONDITIONALLY

APPOINTING PRO BONO COUNSEL

FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSE MBO PARTNERS, INC.

Defendant(s).

/

The Court, on its own motion, hereby conditionally appoints Elisa J. Dozono as counsel of record

for the purpose of limited.

Within 14 days of the date of this Order, the appointed attorney/law firm must file the Pro Bono

Appointment Response Form with the Court with the appropriate option checked.

If representation is denied due to a conflict of interest or other specified reason, the appointment

will be terminated and the Court may appoint substitute counsel.

For more information regarding pro bono forms, procedures, reimbursement of costs, or obtaining a

pro bono civil rights mentor attorney, please refer to the Pro Bono Program Procedures document

located on the Court's website or contact the Pro Bono Panel Administrator.

DATED this 25th day of October, 2016 /s/Marco A. Hernandez

Honorable Marco A. Hernandez

U.S. District Court Judge

Case 3:15-cv-02216-HZ Document 50 Filed 10/25/16 Page 1 of 3
Andrea Olson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON

ANDREA OLSON Case No.: 3:15−cv−02216−HZ

Plaintiff(s),

v. PRO BONO APPOINTMENT

RESPONSE FORM

MBO PARTNERS, INC.

Defendant(s).

/

In response to the Court's Order Appointing Pro Bono Counsel, I hereby certify that:

Representation of for the purpose of limited is accepted. If appropriate, a Substitution of

Counsel will be filed to designate the responsible attorney continuing as counsel of record.

Termination of this appointment is requested based on the following conflict of interest:

No conflict of interest exists. However, termination of this appointment is requested for the

following reason(s):

DATED this day of .

Signature

Printed Name and Oregon State Bar No.

Case 3:15-cv-02216-HZ Document 50 Filed 10/25/16 Page 2 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON

ANDREA OLSON Case No.: 3:15−cv−02216−HZ

Plaintiff(s),

v. NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF PRO

BONO APPOINTMENT (SPECIFIC

MBO PARTNERS, INC. APPOINTMENTS ONLY)

Defendant(s).

/

As counsel of record appointed to represent under the Pro Bono Program for the United States

District Court, District of Oregon, I hereby certify that:

Representation of for the specific purpose of limited has been completed; therefore, my

representation under the Pro Bono Program is concluded and termination of the appointment is

requested; or

I accept full representation of and will remain as counsel of record for the duration of the

case.

DATED this day of .

Signature

Printed Name and Oregon State Bar No.

Case 3:15-cv-02216-HZ Document 50 Filed 10/25/16 Page 3 of 3
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.01

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Transmeta Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Matthew R. Perry,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company for the periods presented therein.

Date: November 8, 2004                   By: /s/ MATTHEW R. PERRY
                                         -------------------------------------
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer,
                                         Transmeta Corporation

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Transmeta Corporation and will be retained by Transmeta
Corporation and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          30,419
<SECURITIES>                                   897,671
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,045,835
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,045,835
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,713
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,045,835
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,307
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   55,510
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (39,203)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          28,542
<SECURITIES>                                     8,254
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,429
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,384
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                74,042
<PP&E>                                          16,883
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,990
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  86,873
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,959
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                      51,751
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    86,873
<SALES>                                         16,132
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,899
<CGS>                                              664
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,685
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,495
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,111
<INCOME-TAX>                                       411
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                700
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       700
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03
        

</TABLE>
#### Sigola Manufacturing, Inc., Respondent, v Dairyland Insurance Co., Appellant.

In this action, the plaintiff seeks to recover under a policy of fire insurance issued to it by the defendant for a loss incurred as a result of a fire in a building it occupies as a tenant. The defendant sought leave to amend its answer to assert a counterclaim to recover certain moneys already paid on the ground that since the plaintiff is not the owner of the building, it has no insurable interest therein.

An insurable interest in property includes "any lawful and substantial economic interest in the safety or preservation of property from loss, destruction or pecuniary damage” (Insurance Law § 3401 [formerly § 148]; *Scarola v Insurance Co.,*31 NY2d 411). It has been recognized that a lessee or tenant of a premises such as the plaintiff may have an insurable interest in the premises leased, especially where he has agreed to return the premises to the lessor in good condition, or has agreed to keep the premises insured *(see,*3 Couch, Insurance *6552d § 24.60). At bar, there does not appear to be any merit to the defendant’s proposed counterclaim, which alleged that the plaintiff had no insurable interest in the damaged premises and, accordingly, Special Term did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to amend the answer (CPLR 3025 [b]; *Edenwald Contr. Co. v City of New York,*60 NY2d 957). Mangano, J. P., Brown, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 172 (Thursday, September 9, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50545-50546]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19408]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as

[[Page 50546]]

amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel; Single Cell Opioid Responses in the Context of HIV 
(SCORCH) Program Expansion: CNS Data Generation for Chronic Opioid, 
Methamphetamine, and/or Cocaine Exposures (U01 Clinical Trial Not 
Allowed).
    Date: October 18, 2021.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Drug 
Abuse, 301 North Stonestreet Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual 
Meeting).
    Contact Person: Yvonne Owens Ferguson, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Extramural Policy and Review, Division of 
Extramural Research, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, 301 
North Stonestreet Avenue, MSC 6021, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 402-
7371, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ceb7b8a1a0a0abe0a8abbca9bbbda1a08ea0a7a6e0a9a1b8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8cf5fae3e2e2e9a2eae9feebf9ffe3e2cce2e5e4a2ebe3fa">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.277, Drug 
Abuse Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, Scientist 
Development Awards, and Research Scientist Awards; 93.278, Drug 
Abuse National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 
93.279, Drug Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 2, 2021.
Tyeshia Roberson-Curtis,
Program Analyst, Office Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-19408 Filed 9-8-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                     EXHIBIT 23


                        INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors
SRS Labs, Inc.


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos.
333-18981, 333-18983, 333-18985, 333-18987, 333-18989, 333-29153 and 333-63493
on Form S-8 of SRS Labs, Inc. of our report dated March 12, 1999, appearing in
SRS Labs, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1998.


/s/  Deloitte & Touche LLP

Costa Mesa, California
March 30, 1999