alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006017EN.01001001.xml

| 24.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 17/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 17/10

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 68/2001 of 12 January 2001, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 363/2004 of 25 February 2004, on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to training aid

(2006/C 17/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

| Aid No | XT 50/04 |
| --- | --- |
| Member State | United Kingdom |
| Region | North East of England |
| Title of aid scheme or name of company receiving individual aid | Training Support Programme — Tees Valley Sub Regional Partnership |
| Legal basis | Regional Development Agency Act 1998 |
| Annual expenditure planned under the scheme or overall amount of individual aid granted to the company | Aid scheme | Annual overall amount | GBP 1,2 million |
| Loans guaranteed | |
| Individual aid | Overall aid amount | |
| Loans guaranteed | |
| Maximum aid intensity | In conformity with Article 4(2)-(7) of the Regulation | Yes | |
| Date of implementation | From 1 July 2004 |
| Duration of scheme or individual aid award | Until 31 March 2005 |
| Objective of aid | General training | Yes |
| Specific training | No |
| Economic sectors concerned | All sectors eligible for training aid | Yes |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Name:
  Fergus Mitchell |
| Address:





  ONE |
| Stella House |
| Goldcrest Way |
| Newburn Riverside |
| NE15 8NY, United Kingdom |

Aid No

XT 50/04

Member State

United Kingdom

Region

North East of England

Title of aid scheme or name of company receiving individual aid

Training Support Programme — Tees Valley Sub Regional Partnership

Legal basis

Regional Development Agency Act 1998

Annual expenditure planned under the scheme or overall amount of individual aid granted to the company

Aid scheme

Annual overall amount

GBP 1,2 million

Loans guaranteed

Individual aid

Overall aid amount

Loans guaranteed

Maximum aid intensity

In conformity with Article 4(2)-(7) of the Regulation

Yes

Date of implementation

From 1 July 2004

Duration of scheme or individual aid award

Until 31 March 2005

Objective of aid

General training

Yes

Specific training

No

Economic sectors concerned

All sectors eligible for training aid

Yes

Name and address of the granting authority

Name:

Fergus Mitchell

Address:

ONE

Stella House

Goldcrest Way

Newburn Riverside

NE15 8NY, United Kingdom

Large individual aid grants

In conformity with Article 5 of the Regulation

Yes

---
Katherine Eitenmiller, OSB # 145731 

Robert A. Baron, OSB # 89020 

HARDER, WELLS, BARON & M ANNING, P .C. 

474 Willamette Street 

Eugene, OR 97401 

(541) 686-1969 

keitenmiller@hwbm.net 

Of Attorneys for the Plaintiff 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

DEBORAH A. ALEXANDER, ) 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

COMMISSIONER, 

Social Security Administration , 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

~~~~~~=='-=-===~~~~ Defendant. ) 

Case No. 6:15-cv-01960-SB 

ORDERFORPAYMENTOFATTORNEY 

FEES PURSUANT TO BAJA 

Based upon the Stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that attorney fees in the 

amount of $13,184.03 are hereby awarded to Plaintiff, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice 

Act (BAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Payment of this award shall be paid via check made payable to 

Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff's attorneys at Harder, Wells, Baron & Manning, P.C., 474 

Willamette Street, Eugene, Oregon 97401. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, the award shall be made 

payable to Plaintiff's attorney if the commissioner confirms that Plaintiff owes no debt to the 

government through the federal treasury offset program. There are no costs or expenses to be 

paid herein. 

Dated this _!/if__ day of May 2017. 

PRESENTED BY: 

sf Katherine Eitenmiller 

Harder, Wells, Baron & Manning, P .C. 

Of Attorneys for Plaintiff
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 168 (Thursday, September 2, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 49332]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19001]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than October 4, 2021.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Chris P. Wangen, Assistant 
Vice President) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291:
    1. Dairyland Bank Holding Corporation, La Crosse, Wisconsin; to 
retain 16.234 percent of the voting shares of Farmers State Bank-
Hillsboro, Hillsboro, Wisconsin.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 30, 
2021.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2021-19001 Filed 9-1-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Communications & Power Industries
Holding Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 28,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Joel Littman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Joel Littman

Joel Littman
Chief Financial Officer
August 8, 2002
EXHIBIT
      31.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      Matthew Boyle, certify that:


1.  I
      have
      reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Tech/Ops Sevcon, Inc.;


2.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
      in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
      results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
      periods presented in this report;


4.  The
      registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
      and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
      Act
      Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:


a)  Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
      and
      procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
      information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
      is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
      period in which this report is being prepared;


b)  Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and
      presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
      this
      report based on such evaluation; and


c)  Disclosed
      in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has
      materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
      registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and


5.  The
      registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
      registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
      directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


a)  All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and


b)  Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting.




Date:
      December 14, 2006




/s/
      Matthew Boyle


Matthew
      Boyle


President
      and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 99.2

                                 CERTIFICATION

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of National
Processing, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's
knowledge, that the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year-ended
December 31, 2002 (the "REPORT") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: February 19, 2003

                                /s/ Jon L. Gorney
                                -----------------
                                Name: Jon L. Gorney
                                Title: Chairman and
                                       Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6354

LYNWOOD HERBERT JARELS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GEORGE M. MCMILLAN, Sheriff of Roanoke City Jail; U. S. MARSHAL, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-87-R) Submitted: July 14, 1998 Decided: July 29, 1998 Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lynwood Herbert Jarels, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Lynwood Herbert Jarels appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) and Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971) complaint without prejudice. A dismissal without prejudice is not reviewable by the court unless the reasons stated for the dismissal clearly disclose that no amendment to the complaint could cure its defects. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). In the present case, the district court properly found that Jarels failed toallege all of the elements necessary to support his claim of deliberate indifference to a serious medical need. Because Jarels could possibly cure these defects by amending his complaint, we dismiss this appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Nathaniel Keener, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kooper, J.), rendered December 17, 1982, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Niehoff, J. P., Weinstein, Kunzeman and Spatt, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Xerion  EcoSolutions  Group Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Robert
Skanes, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in this Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated this 18th day of May, 2005.


 /s/ Robert Skanes
---------------------------
Robert Skanes
Principal Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

# AGENCY:

National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice, discontinuation of OMB Control Number.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Commerce, in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), invites the general public and other Federal agencies to comment on proposed, and continuing information collections, which helps us assess the impact of our information collection requirements and minimize the public's reporting burden. The purpose of this notice is to notify the public that NOAA intends to request discontinuation of OMB Control Number 0648-0472. The information collections under this control number are being merged into NOAA information collection 0648-0718 to improve efficiency and consolidate like collections.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Requests for additional information or specific questions related to this discontinuation should be directed to Adrienne Thomas,                         *Adrienne.thomas@noaa.gov,*                         240-477-2372.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On June 8, 2021, a notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     (86 FR 30444) seeking public comments on NOAA's request to extend information collection 0648-0472, NOAA Community-based Restoration Program Progress Reports, which currently expires December 31, 2021.                

In the interest of efficiency and consolidating similar collections, NOAA determined it was appropriate to merge the reporting requirements of 0648-0472 to OMB Control Number 0648-0718, NOAA Financial Assistance Performance Progress Reports. NOAA will publish a 30-day notice of submission for information collection 0648-0718 that identifies this merge request. Once approved by OMB, control number 0648-0472 will be discontinued.

Sheleen Dumas,

Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief Information Officer, Commerce Department.

[FR Doc. 2021-19267 Filed 9-3-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
#### 1521 Square Inc., Petitioner, v Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Respondent.

— Proceeding pursuant to EDPL 207 to review a determination of the respondent condemning a certain parcel of real property owned by the petitioner to permit the respondent to erect a new operations center to service the electrical power needs of the surrounding communities.

Adjudged that the determination and findings are confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

The petitioner’s contention that the proposed operations center will not constitute a public use of the subject property is unpersuasive in light of the evidence adduced at the public hearings *(see, Matter of Neptune Assoc. v Consolidated Edison Co.,*125 AD2d 473 [decided herewith]).

Moreover, we disagree with the petitioner’s claim that the acquisition of its property by the respondent is ultra vires. The hearing record supports the determination that the petitioner’s property is needed by the respondent in order to carry out its public function; hence the acquisition by eminent domain is authorized because it is "necessary for [the respondent’s] corporate purposes” (Transportation Corporations Law § 11 [3-a]; *see, Matter of Neptune Assoc. v Consolidated Edison Co., supra; Cuglar v Power Auth.,*4 Mise 2d 879, 901, *affd*4 AD2d 801, *affd*3 NY2d 1006).

Additionally, the Hearing Officer’s findings concerning the many advantages offered by the site and the lack of adverse environmental and traffic impacts are supported by the evidence in the record and we discern no basis for disturbing them *(see generally, Town of Coxsackie v Dernier,*105 AD2d 966; *Long Is. R. R. Co. v Long Is. Light. Co.,*103 AD2d 156, *affd*64 NY2d 1088; *Matter of Dowling Coll, v Flacke,*78 AD2d 551).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are beyond our scope of review *(see,*EDPL § 207; *Matter of Neptune Assoc. v Consolidated Edison Co., supra; Matter of First Broadcasting Corp. v*
      *460
      *City of Syracuse,*78 AD2d 490, *appeal dismissed*53 NY2d 939; *see generally, Pizzuti v Metropolitan Tr. Auth.,*114 AD2d 943, *affd*67 NY2d 603; *Village Auto Body Works v Incorporated Vil. of Westbury,*90 AD2d 502, *appeal dismissed*58 NY2d 778). Thompson, J. P., Rubin, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-06-006-CV

NO. 2-06-155-CV

Ex Parte S.R.D., a child

In the Interest of B.G.D. a/k/a S.R.D., A Child	APPELLANT

	----------

	FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 COURT OF WICHITA COUNTY	NO. 2-006  -04400    08-283-              -CV

JOSEPH H. LEE, III, VIRGINIA K. LEE AND 	APPELLANTS

PATRICIA LEE BARROW AND SAVINGS 

OF AMERICA, INC.	CuUbBeElLlLiIsS, InNcC. aAnNdD ScCoOtTtT WiInNdDlLeE	   APPELLANTS	

	V.

CaArRtTeErR & BuUrRgGeEsSsS, InNcC. OPAL LEE, IN HER CAPACITY AS 	APPELLEE

 TEMPORARY ADMINISTRATOR OF 

THE ESTATE OF DALE T. LEE, DECEASED	

	----------

	FROM THE 141ST141ST          PROBATE DISTRICT COURT  NO. 2 OF TARRANT                     TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered “aAppellant’s [s’]’ “Unopposed Motion For voluVoluntary To Dismissal Of aAppealNotice Of Nonsuit.”  It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

	Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the appellants [ [s][- [oOR the the party incurring the same], for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:   GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

    HOLMAN, GARDNER, and WALKER                                     , JJ.

DELIVERED:      September 28, 2006  aUGUSTAugust 7, 2008