alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

                    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act that the Veterans' Rural Health Advisory Committee will hold a teleconference meeting Monday, September 20, through Wednesday, September 22, 2021. The Zoom meeting link is                     *https://zoom.us/​j/​97205365400,*                     the teleconference phone number is 1-646-558-8656, and the Meeting ID is 972 0536 5400. The meeting will begin each day at 11:00 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. (EST). The meetings are open to the public.                

The purpose of the Committee is to advise the Secretary of Veterans Affairs on rural health care issues affecting Veterans. The Committee examines programs and policies that impact the delivery of VA rural health care to Veterans and discusses ways to improve and enhance VA access to rural health care services for Veterans.

The agenda will include updates from Department leadership, the Executive Director Office of the VA Office of Rural Health, and the Committee Chair; as well as presentations by subject-matter experts on general rural health care access.

                    Public comments will be received at 3:00 p.m. on September 22, 2021. Interested parties should contact Ms. Judy Bowie, Management Analyst, via email at                     *VRHAC@va.gov,*                     or by mail at 810 Vermont Avenue NW (12POP7),                           ( print page 49097)                        Washington, DC 20420. Individuals wishing to speak are invited to submit a 1-2-page summary of their comment for inclusion in the official meeting record. Any member of the public seeking additional information should contact Ms. Bowie at the phone number or email address noted above.                

Dated: August 27, 2021.

LaTonya L. Small,

Federal Advisory Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2021-18879 Filed 8-31-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1690 

To designate the United States courthouse located at 700 Grant Street 

in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Joseph F. Weis Jr. United States 

Courthouse’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 26, 2015 

Mr. MICHAEL F. DOYLE of Pennsylvania (for himself and Mr. MURPHY of 

Pennsylvania) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To designate the United States courthouse located at 700 

Grant Street in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Joseph 

F. Weis Jr. United States Courthouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The United States courthouse located at 700 Grant 

5 Street in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, shall be known and 

6 designated as the ‘‘Joseph F. Weis Jr. United States 

7 Courthouse’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1690 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the United 

4 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed 

5 to be a reference to the ‘‘Joseph F. Weis Jr. United States 

6 Courthouse’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Elisha M.W. Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent; Ronald W., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Rebekah J.W. Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent; Ronald W., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.)

[946 NYS2d 481]

—In two related child protective proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the father appeals from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Lim, J.), dated February 10, 2011, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated October 25, 2010, made after a hearing, finding that he abused Rebekah J.W and *864derivately abused Elisha M.W, released the subject children to the custody of the mother. The father’s appeal from the order of disposition brings up for review the fact-finding order.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The right of a respondent parent “to be present at every stage of a Family Court Act article 10 proceeding is not absolute, as such a proceeding is civil in nature” *(Matter of Q.-L. H.,*27 AD3d 738, 739 [2006]; *see Matter of Deshawn D.O. [Maria T.O.],*81 AD3d 961, 962 [2011]). “The Family Court must balance the due process rights of an article 10 respondent with the mental and emotional well being of the child” *(Matter of Q.-L. H.,*27 AD3d at 739; *see Matter of Deshawn D.O. [Maria T.O.],*81 AD3d at 962). Here, the Family Court properly weighed the respective rights and interests of the father and the subject child Rebekah J.W., and thereafter providently exercised its discretion in permitting her to testify via closed-circuit television so that she did not have to testify in front of her father *(see Matter of Q.-L. H.,*27 AD3d at 739). Dillon, J.P., Dickerson, Austin and Miller, JJ., concur.
Hopi Long-term Moni

Program for Öngtup
Goals and Challenges in Pro

Development• Cultural importance:

– Origin point– Location for numerous

traditional narratives andthe home for many deities

– Ancestral home– Final resting place

• Challenges:

– Restrictions on entry into

the Öngtupqa

– Sampling issues

“Integrate values into term moni
Solution

• Survey based approach • Premise - it is the during the interpretation 

not necessarily during its collection where values and traditional knowledge are best i

• Developed out of the TEM integration pro

2004)
Traditional

Knowledge

Both seek to explain the world we live in tobservation and manipulation...• TK is relatively emic; Science is etic• TK is more implicit; Science explicit• TK incorporates natural selection in d• TK is more holistic; Science is more r• TK records knowledge in culture; Sci

continuum
Data Acquisition

• Relies primarily on data collected by other 

scientists

– For TEM resources, made sure that types 

of data being collected

where appropriate

• Independent observation by 

limited number of Hopis on river trips

– Repeat visits to specific sites– Locations with culturally 

important resources

– Repeat photography– Voucher specimens
Data Synthesis and Prese

• Data needs to be made relevant; conver

terms or concepts

• Information converted to Standardized • User groups

–General Hopi Public–Tribal Council and

Administrators

–Land managers and

resource professionals

–River participants and

Cultural Advisors

• Education (at all

levels) is critical to

program operation
Feedback (Surveys

• Standardized survey

– In depth survey for river trip participants

• Interviews and Focus groups

– On river– At Hopi– In field

• Tutuveni
Analysis and Reporti

• Qualitative and quantitative analysis

– Survey design allows for assessing trend

changing resource conditions and/or chavalues

• Access and Nvivo 7 databases

– Survey data is of a nominal scale, non-p– Qualitative analysis of information cont

• Annual report detailing trends on resour

a Hopi perspective and recommendationappropriate
#### JOHN F. McELLEN, *ET AL.,*PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. MILDRED PADGETT, *ET AL.,*DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS.

*Messrs. Morris, Downing & Sherre-d, Mr. John R. Knox*and *Mr. Thomas J. Bain*for the petitioners.

*Messrs. Macherley & Friedman, Mr. William J. McGovern*and *Mr. Stephen Roseman*for the respondents.

April 17, 1961.

Denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.7

                              FIRST AMENDMENT TO
                            ATRIA COMMUNITIES, INC.
               NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS 1996 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
               ------------------------------------------------


     A.   Atria Communities, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Company"), adopted
the Atria Communities, Inc. Non-Employee Directors 1996 Stock Incentive Plan
("Plan") on June 13, 1996, and the Plan was approved by the sole stockholder of
the Company on June 14, 1996.

     B.   The Company desires to grant non-employee directors options to
purchase an increased number of shares.

     C.   The Company desires to increase the number of shares available for
issuance pursuant to the Plan.


     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:


  1. AMENDMENT OF PLAN.

     (a) Section 3.3 of the Plan is hereby deleted and the following substituted
         in its place:

             "3.3 Additional Option Grants. On July 18, 1997, and each
             anniversary of that date hereafter, each Non-Employee Director,
             other than the Chairman of the Board of the Company, shall
             automatically be granted an Option to purchase 5,000 Shares, and
             the Chairman of the Board of the Company shall be automatically
             granted an Option to purchase 10,000 Shares, provided that (i) such
             Non-Employee Director shall have continually served as a director
             of the Company for the nine-month period prior to the date of the
             Option grant and (ii) the number of Shares available for grant
             under the Plan is sufficient to permit such automatic grant."

     (b) Article 4 of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting the number
"250,000" and substituting therefor the number "350,000".

  2. CONTINUATION OF BALANCE OF PLAN.  Except as amended hereby, the Plan is
unchanged and remains in full force and effect.

  3. GOVERNING LAW.  This Amendment shall be governed by, and construed in
accordance with, the laws of the State of Delaware without regard to its
conflict of laws rules.
<PAGE>

  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been adopted by the Company as of the
16th day of July, 1997.


                                        ATRIA COMMUNITIES, INC.


                                        By: /s/ W. PATRICK MULLOY, II
                                           ------------------------------------
                                        Title: Chief Executive Officer
                                              ---------------------------------

                                      -2-
Southern Paiute Vegetation a

Cultural Resource Monitorin

Program

Charley Bulletts

Southern Paiute Consortium
‐

Monitoring Program

• History• Process• Schedule

Site 2014 2015 2016 

South Canyon beach, archaeology beach, cultural* beach, archaeology beach, 

Nankoweap archaeology plants, cultural archaeology plants, Lava/Chuar archaeology archaeologyTanner archaeology archaeologyBedrock plants, cultural

Deer Creek beach, archaeology,

plants

beach, archaeology,plants

beach, archaeology,plants

beach, plants

Kanab Creek beach, archaeology beach, archaeology beach, archaeology beach, 

plants

Vulcan’s Anvil cultural plants, cultural cultural culturaWhitmore beach, archaeology beach, archaeology beach, archaeology beach, 

Pre Parashant archae

Ompi cultural Cultural cultural culturaSpring Canyon archaeology, plants plants, cultural archaeology, plants plants, 

Indian Canyon archaeology Cultural archaeology culturaPumpkin Spring spring, cultural spring, cultural spring, cultural spring, 

Ledges archaeology, spring archaeology, spring

Granite Park cultural Cultural cultural cultura
Beach at South Canyon

2011 2013 201

Photos monitoring trips show an increase in sediment as vegetation change and the effects of the tamarisk b
Beach at South Canyon

Sediment change at the gully of the beach at South

Canyon, showing sand bank deposits, photos from 

(left) and 2015 (right).
Kanab Creek

Sand deposits above Kanab Creek show anincrease in deposition. Photos from 2013 (left2015 (right).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 20-0307 DENNIS J. HOBBS,

Petitioner and Appellant, v. STATE OF MONTANA,

Respondent and Appellee. 

# r - r-- 

# LF: MAR 2 3 2021 Bowen Greenwoo0 Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana ORDER

Appellant has filed a third motion for a 120-day extension oftime to file his opening briefin the above referenced matter. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED thatthe motion for extension is DENIED. Appellant has until April 8, 2021,within which to file his opening brief. Ifthe briefis not filed by the above date this matter will be dismissed. DATED this 23rd day ofMarch,2021. For the Court, ChiefJustice 03/24/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0307
Glen Canyon Dam Technical Work Meeting June 29-30, 2010 

 List of Attachments 

 AIF = Agenda Information Form No. Attachment Presenter / 

Author 1a Minutes from the June 14, 2010, BAHG/TWG Combined Conference Call  

Shane Capron  Scott A. Wright   Shane Capron  Rick Johnson Malcolm Wilson 

1b Minutes from the June 21, 2010, TWG Webinar/Conference Call with Memo from John Hamill to Shane Capron dated May 17, 2010, Subject: TWG and stakeholder requests for GCMRC to evaluate the effects of various dam operation scenarios on sediment storage and loss in the Grand Canyon with “Open File Report 2010-1133 Evaluation of Water Year 2011 Glen Canyon Dam Flow Release Scenarios on Downstream Sand Storage along the Colorado river in Arizona” by Scott A. Wright and Paul E. Grams and PPT 

1c Minutes from the July 27, 2010, TWG Conference Call Attachment A: Socioeconomic AHG Report (redline version) Attachment B: General Core Monitoring Plan AHG Report (redline version) Attachment C: Grand Canyon Trust Hydrograph Recommendation Attachment D: DOI-DOE Hydrograph Recommendation 

2 Action Item Tracking Report Shane Capron 3 Letter from Reclamation to the Pueblo of Zuni dated June 15, 2010, Subject: 

Nearshore Ecology Study Research Project (Action Within 30 Days) Glen Knowles 

4a USGS/GCMRC Biology Program Updates Matthew Andersen4b USGS/GCMRC Biology Program Updates – Cultural Program Helen Fairley 4c USGS/GCMRC Biology Program Updates – 2010 Biological Monitoring 

Summary Matthew Andersen

5a Socio-economics Ad Hoc Group Report Mary Barger 5b Socio-economics Ad Hoc Group Handout Shane Capron 6a E-mail message to the TWG dated 6/24/10 transmitting the General Core 

Monitoring Plan for the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Work Group Helen Fairley 

6b Core Monitoring Plan: Next Steps PPT 7a Executive Summary – Evaluation of Criteria Guiding Transitions of Science 

and Management Actions in Adaptive Management Program 

Dave Garrett 7b Evaluating Criteria Guiding Transition of Science and Management Activities 

in Adaptive Management Programs PPT 7c Evaluation of Criteria Guiding Transitions of Science and Management 

Actions in Adaptive Management Program (Complete Report) 8 Memo from Dave Garrett to John Hamill, Subject: Science Advisor Program 

Proposed Budget Reductions: 2010/2012 Dave Garrett 

9a Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program Biennial Budget and Work Plan – Fiscal Years 2011-12, TWG Review Draft dated June 11, 2010 

9b Revised spreadsheet dated 6/28/2010 with GCMRC Recommended Redirection of Funds John Hamill 

9c GCMRC Proposed FY11-12 Biennial Budget and Work Plan 

Other Documents Distributed at the meeting but not Presented 

10 Mechanics and Modeling of Flow, Sediment Transport and Morphologic Change in Riverine Lateral Separation Zones 

GCMRC 

11 Floods and Sandbars in the Grand Canyon, a publication of the Geological Society of America (published in GSA Today, Volume 9, No. 4, April 1999 

GCMRC 

12 “Review of Geoarchaeological Investigation and an Archaeological Treatment Plan for 151 Sites in the Grand Canyon, Arizona” by the GCDAMP Science Advisors dated July 2009 

Dr. Dave Garrett
# C_2006126EN.01000401.xml

| 30.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 126/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 126/4

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(2006/C 126/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

Date of adoption:

Member State: Austria (Land of Tyrol)

Aid No: N 76/2005

Title: Support of generators of green electricity from solid biomass — Tyrol

Objective: Environmental aid (not sector specific)

Legal basis: Ökostromgesetz, BGBl. I Nr. 149/2002

Richtlinie des Landes Tirol zur Förderung von Ökostromanlagen auf Basis fester Biomasse

Budget: EUR 3,4 million for the whole duration

Intensity or amount: 25 %

Duration: until 31.12.2007

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/secretariat_general/sgb/state_aids/

Date of adoption:

Member State: Austria

Aid No: N 350/2005

Title: Amendment for Fine Dust Reduction to the Austrian Guidelines for Environmental Aid 2002

Objective: Environmental protection

Legal basis:

| 1) | Umweltförderungsgesetz (UFG) BGBl. Nr. 185/1993 |
| --- | --- |

1)

Umweltförderungsgesetz (UFG) BGBl. Nr. 185/1993

| 2) | Förderungsrichtlinien 2002 für die Umweltförderung im Inland (FRL-UFI) |
| --- | --- |

2)

Förderungsrichtlinien 2002 für die Umweltförderung im Inland (FRL-UFI)

Budget: Total EUR 7,5 million (2005: EUR 2,5 million, 2006: EUR 5 million)

Intensity or amount: Maximal 30 %. SME bonus (10 %) and Regional bonuses (5 % or 10 %) possible

Duration: until 31.12.2007

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/secretariat_general/sgb/state_aids/

---
Exhibit 32.7


                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The  undersigned  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
Geodyne Energy Income Limited  Partnership II-G ("Issuer") for the period ending
December 31, 2003 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 19th day of March, 2004.

                                   GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                   PARTNERSHIP II-G
                                   ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)
**Exhibit 10.89**

 

**Fourth Amendment to PromissoryNote**

** **

**THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE** dated this 15th  day of December, 2005, is by and among ObsidianLeasing Company, Inc., a Mississippi corporation (“Borrower”) and FairHoldings, Inc. (“Fair”), an Ohio corporation.  The parties agree as follows:

** **

**Recitals**

** **

**WHEREAS**, Borrower and Fair entered into that certainPromissory Note dated April 10, 2002, in the principal amount of $100,000.00,which was subsequently amended on March 31, 2005, by the Third AmendedPromissory Note (Line of Credit)to increase the amount of the Note to$1,000,000.00 (the original Promissory Note and all amendments thereto beingreferred to herein as the “Note’); and

** **

**WHEREAS,** Fair has agreed to amend the Note in order toincrease to $2,000,000.00 the amount which Borrower may borrow;

** **

**WHEREAS**, Fair is willing to amend the Note subject to theterms herein and subject to the amendment of the Note as herein provided;

** **

**NOW THEREFORE**, in consideration of the premises, and the mutual promisesherein contained, the parties agree that the Note shall be, and hereby is,amended as provided herein and the parties further agree as follows:

** **

** The principal amount of the Noteis hereby increased so that the total amount that can be borrowed under theNote is $2,000,000.**

** **

**All other terms and conditions contained in the Note, the SecurityAgreement and Mortgage or other related documents shall remain the same andshall continue in full force and effect that are not specifically amendedherein and shall continue during the term of the Note without change, except toreflect the increase in the amount of the Note and to provide securitytherefore for the entire amount that may become due under the Note.**

** **

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, Borrower, and Fair have caused this Fourth Amendmentto Promissory Note to be executed as of the day first written above.

 

 
| **Fair Holdings, Inc.**         | ** ** | **Obsidian Leasing Company, Inc.** |
|--------------------------------------|------------|-----------------------------------------|
| ** **                           | ** ** | ** **                              |
| ** **                           | ** ** | ** **                              |
| **/s/ Timothy  S. Durham**           | ** ** | ** **                              | **/s/ Jeffrey  Osler** | ** ** |
| **By:  Timothy S. Durham, CEO** | ** ** | **By: Jeffrey Osler, President**        |
|                                      |            |                                         |  |  |

 

1

----