alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 3.2

                                  STATE OF DELAWARE

                           OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE





     I, EDWARD J. FREEL, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, DO
HEREBY CERTIFY THE ATTACHED IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF
AMENDMENT OF "QCS CORPORATION", FILED IN THIS OFFICE ON THE TWENTY-SIXTH DAY
OF JULY, A.D. 1994, AT 9 CLOCK A.M.

                                        -----------------------------------
                                        Edward J. Freel, Secretary of State


2330564   8100                          AUTHENTICATION:     9742782

991190924                               DATE:     05-13-99

<PAGE>

                               CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                          OF

                             CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION


QCS CORPORATION, a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, does hereby certify:

     FIRST:  That at a meeting of the Board of Directors of QCS Corporation,
resolutions were duly adopted setting forth a proposed amendment of the
Certificate of Incorporation of said corporation, declaring said amendment to
be advisable and calling a meeting of the stockholders of said corporation
for consideration thereof. The resolution setting forth the proposed
amendment is as follows:

          RESOLVED, that the Certificate of Incorporation of this corporation be
          amended by changing the Article thereof numbered " Fourth " so that,
          as amended said Article shall be and read as follows:

          The total number of shares of stock which the corporation shall have
          the authority to issue is 40 million shares of common stock with a par
          value of $0.001 per share.

     SECOND: That thereafter, pursuant to the resolution of its Board of
Directors, a special meeting of the stockholders of said corporation was duly
called and held, upon notice in accordance with Section 222 of the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware at which meeting of the necessary
number of shares as required by statute were voted in favor of the amendment.

     THIRD: That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the
provisions of Section 242 of the the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.

     FOURTH: That the capital of said corporation shall not be reduced under
or reason of said amendment.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said QCS CORPORATION has caused its corporate seal
to be hereunto affixed and this certificate to be signed by MARCEL VAN
HEESEWIJK its authorized officer this 27TH day of JUNE, 1994.



                         -----------------------------------------------------
                         Authorized Officer, Title
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




To the knowledge of each of the undersigned, this Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Blonder Tongue Laboratories, Inc. for the applicable reporting period.




Date:  August 4, 2010                                                                              By:          /s/ James A. Luksch


James A. Luksch, Chief Executive Officer





By:         /s/  Eric Skolnik





Eric Skolnik, Chief Financial Officer
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2140

To amend the Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act of

1992 to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate in the

design, planning, and construction of the Denver Water Reuse project.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 5, 1998

Mr. CAMPBELL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To amend the Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act of 1992 to authorize the Secretary of the

Interior to participate in the design, planning, and construction of the Denver Water Reuse project.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DENVER WATER REUSE PROJECT.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Reclamation Projects Au5 thorization and Adjustment Act of 1992 (43 U.S.C. 390h

6 et seq.) is amended—
2

•S 2140 IS

1 (1) by redesignating sections 1631, 1632, and

2 1633 (42 U.S.C. 390h–13, 390h–14, 390h–15) as

3 sections 1632, 1633, and 1634, respectively; and

4 (2) by inserting after section 1630 (43 U.S.C.

5 390h–12p) the following:

6 ‘‘SEC. 1631. DENVER WATER REUSE PROJECT.

7 ‘‘(a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary, in coopera8 tion with the appropriate State and local authorities, may

9 participate in the design, planning, and construction of the

10 Denver Water Reuse project to reclaim and reuse water

11 in the service area of the Denver Water Department of

12 the city and county of Denver, Colorado.

13 ‘‘(b) COST SHARE.—The Federal share of the cost

14 of the project described in subsection (a) shall not exceed

15 25 percent of the total cost.

16 ‘‘(c) LIMITATION.—The Secretary shall not provide

17 funds for the operation or maintenance of the project de18 scribed in subsection (a).’’.

19 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

20 (1) The table of contents in section 2 of the

21 Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment

22 Act of 1992 (43 U.S.C. prec. 371) is amended—

23 (A) by redesignating the items relating to

24 sections 1631, 1632, and 1633 as items relat-
3

•S 2140 IS

1 ing to sections 1632, 1633, and 1634, respec2 tively, and

3 (B) by inserting after the item relating to

4 section 1630 the following:

‘‘Sec. 1631. Denver Water Reuse Project.’’.

5 (2) Section 1632(a) of the Reclamation Projects

6 Authorization and Adjustment Act of 1992 (as re7 designated by subsection (a)(1)) is amended by

8 striking ‘‘1630’’ and inserting ‘‘1631’’.

9 (3) Section 1633(c) of the Reclamation Projects

10 Authorization and Adjustment Act of 1992 (as re11 designated by subsection (a)(1)) is amended by

12 striking ‘‘section 1633’’ and inserting ‘‘section

13 1634’’.

14 (4) Section 1634 of the Reclamation Projects

15 Authorization and Adjustment Act of 1992 (as re16 designated by subsection (a)(1)) is amended by

17 striking ‘‘section 1632’’ and inserting ‘‘section

18 1633’’.

Æ
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40649 Conference Calendar

WILLIAM EARL DOYLE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus REINFORD KANE, Lt.; FNU MILLER; J. DETRICE; ED MCELUEN, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 5:96-CV-136

- - - - - - - - - - October 24, 1996 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * William Earl Doyle, Texas prisoner #556492, appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights action as frivolous. The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the complaint on statute of limitations grounds. See Ancar v. Sara Plasma, Inc. , 964 F.2d 465, 468 (5th Cir. 1992).No. 96-40649 - 2 - Doyle argues for the first time on appeal that he wrote the wrong date in his statement of facts as to when the incident occurred and that, as a result, the limitations period had not yet run when he filed his complaint. Doyle has shown no plain error with respect to this belated allegation. Robertson v. Plano City of Tex. , 70 F.3d 21, 23 (5th Cir. 1995), cert. denied , 115 S. Ct. 1266 (1995).
AFFIRMED.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee v. Jose Luis ZERTUCHE, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 06-40813

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 24, 2007.

*463James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Mauro Barreiro, Edinburg, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jose Luis Zertuche appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute more than 500 grams of cocaine.

Zertuche first argues that the district court erred by imposing a four-level guidelines enhancement based on the finding that he was an organizer or leader of the offense. *See*U.S.S.G. § 3Bl.l(a) (2005). Although some evidence suggested that another co-defendant was the leader or organizer, in light of the evidence as a whole, we conclude that the district court did not clearly err in finding that Zertuche was a leader or organizer. *See United States v. Villanueva,*408 F.3d 193, 204 (5th Cir.2005). Assuming arguendo that the evidence supported a finding that Zertuche’s co-defendant warranted an enhancement as a leader or organizer, we note that such a finding would not preclude a finding that Zertuche also was a leader or organizer. *See*§ 3B1.1 comment. (n. 4).

Zertuche argues that the district court erred by imposing a two-level enhancement for possession of a firearm in connection with the offense. *See*§ 2Dl.l(b)(l). Again, although there is some contrary evidence, in light of the evidence that the firearm was found in Zertuche’s closet along with a quantity of cocaine, we conclude that the district court did not clearly err in imposing this enhancement. *See United States v. Eastland,*989 F.2d 760, 770 (5th Cir.1993).

Zertuche argues that the district court erred by imposing a two-level enhancement for use of a minor to assist in avoiding detection of the offense. *See*§ 3B1.4. In light of the undisputed evidence that a co-defendant was to smuggle a quantity of cocaine hidden in an infant carrier seat and that the co-defendant’s infant child was brought to the bus station, we conclude that the district court did not clearly err in finding that this enhancement was warranted.

Finally, Zertuche argues that the district court erred by denying him the benefits of § 5C1.2, which provides for an exception to certain mandatory minimum sentences and a two-level reduction in of*464fense level. *See*§ 5C1.2; § 2B1.1(b)(7) (2005). Zertuche’s argument is premised on the assumption that the district court erred in finding that he was an organizer or leader. Because we find that the district court did not clearly err in finding that Zertuehe was an organizer or leader, the district court did not clearly err in finding Zertuehe ineligible for relief under § 5C1.2. *See United States v. Miller,*179 F.3d 961, 963-64 (5th Cir.1999).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

3BA PROPERTIES LLC,

Pl aintiff,

and

KEVIN LUBAHN; BRENDA FOR D,

Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

v.

LARRY CLAUNCH; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 14

- 35591

D.C. No. 2:13

- cv

- 00979

- TSZ

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

Thomas S. Zilly, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14 , 2016 **

Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and FISHER , Circuit Judges.

Kevin LuBahn and Brenda Ford appeal from the district court’s judgment

dismissing their action alleging federal and state law claims . We have jurisdiction

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

DEC 21 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 14

- 35591

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion a dismissal for

failure to effect time ly service

. In re Sheehan , 253 F.3d 507, 511 (9th Cir. 2001 )

.

We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing plaintiffs’ claims

against defendant Larry Claunch because plaintiffs fai led to establish good cause

for failure to eff

ect timely service of the sum mons and complaint

. See Fed. R. Civ.

Pro. 4(f) ; Brockmeyer v. May , 383 F.3d 798 (9th Cir. 2004) (outlining the ways in

which service of process may be effectuated under Rule 4(f)).

We deny appellees’ requests for costs or attorney ’s fees on appeal , set forth

in their answering brief, without prejudice to filing a motion in accordance with the

Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and Ninth Circuit Rule 39

- 1.6.

AFFIRMED

.
Technical Work Group Meeting

FINAL AGENDA

Glen Canyon Dam

Adaptive Management Program

Technical Work Group Meeting

Bureau of Indian Affairs

2 Arizona Center, 400 N. 5th Street

Phoenix AZ

Conference Rooms A&B

Nov. 13, 2001

START

TIME TOPIC PERSON PURPOSE MATERIALS

9:30 a.m. Welcome and

Administrative

Kurt Dongoske 1. Introductions and

Determination of Quorum

2. Review Action Items from

Sept. 6-7, 2001, meeting

3. Approval of Sept. 6-7, 2001,

Meeting Minutes

4. TWG Calendar for FY 2002

Agenda

Action Items

Draft Minutes

Calendar

9:45 a.m. Legislative Updates Randy Peterson Information Legislative

Updates

10 a.m. Approval of INs Barry Gold Recommendation to AMWG Information

Needs

12 noon L U N C H

1 p.m. Final Aquatic PEP Review 

Presentation

Mike Bradford Information, formation of TWG ad

hoc group to evaluate

Aquatic PEP

Presentation

2 p.m. Approval of 2003 Work

Plan / Budget / Carryover

Request

Barry Gold &

Randy Peterson

Recommendation to AMWG FY 2003 Work

Plans 

3 p.m. B R E A K

3:15 p.m. Approval of 2003 work

Plan / Budget / Carryover

Request (cont.)

Barry Gold & 

Randy Peterson

Information

4:45 p.m. Wrap-up and Adjourn Kurt Dongoske
Technical Work Group Meeting

FINAL AGENDA

Glen Canyon Dam

Adaptive Management Program

Technical Work Group Meeting

Bureau of Indian Affairs

2 Arizona Center, 400 N. 5th Street

Phoenix AZ

Conference Rooms A&B

Nov. 14, 2001

START

TIME TOPIC PERSON PURPOSE MATERIALS

8 a.m. Welcome and

Administrative

Kurt Dongoske Introductions and 

Determination of Quorum

Agenda

8:15 a.m. Basin Hydrology Tom Ryan Information Basin Hydrology

9 a.m. Trends in Recruitment and Abundance of the LCR

Population of HBC

Interim Conservation

Plan for Ambersnails

of the Southwestern

U.S.

Lew Coggins

Jeff Sorensen

Information

10:30 a.m. B R E A K 

11 a.m. Ad Hoc Group

Updates

- Sediment

- Exper. Flows

Matt Kaplinski

Randy Peterson

Information Ad Hoc Group

Updates

11:20 a.m. Presentation on

comparing stage/

discharge below

the GCD gage and

Lees Ferry

Steve Wiele Information

11:50 a.m. Wrap-up Kurt Dongoske 1. Future agenda items

2. Meeting Review

12 noon Adjourn Kurt Dongoske
# C_2006135EN.01000201.xml

| 9.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 135/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 135/2

---

Publication of decisions by Member States to grant or revoke operating licenses pursuant to Article 13(4) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92 on licensing of air carriers (1)
   (2)

1

2

(2006/C 135/02)

(Text with EEA relevance)

AUSTRIA

Operating licences granted

Category B:   Operating licences including the restriction of Article 5(7)(a) of Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92

| Name of air carrier | Address of air carrier | Permitted to carry | Decision effective since |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| HAWEI-AIR
  Luftfahrt GmbH | Schulgasse 9 |
| A-8010 Graz |

Name of air carrier

Address of air carrier

Permitted to carry

Decision effective since

HAWEI-AIR

Luftfahrt GmbH

Schulgasse 9

A-8010 Graz

passengers, mail, cargo

11.4.2006

---

(1)  OJ L 240, 24.8.1992, p. 1.

1

(2)  Communicated to the European Commission before 31.8.2005

2

---
CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's best knowledge and belief, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
Geodyne Energy Income Limited Partnership II-D ("Issuer") for the period ending
December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 25th day of March, 2003.

                                   GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                   PARTNERSHIP II-D
                                   ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1789 

To ensure the safety of DOT–111 tank cars by improving standards for 

new tank cars and upgrading existing tank cars, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 14, 2015 

Mr. PAYNE (for himself, Ms. NORTON, Mr. RUSH, Mr. CONNOLLY, Ms. 

SLAUGHTER, and Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Homeland Security, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To ensure the safety of DOT–111 tank cars by improving 

standards for new tank cars and upgrading existing tank 

cars, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tank Car Safety and 

5 Security Act of 2015’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1789 IH

1 SEC. 2. DOT–111 TANK CAR IMPROVEMENTS. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the 

3 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transpor4 tation shall revise regulations regarding DOT–111 tank 

5 cars to— 

6 (1) improve the tank car design standards for 

7 new cars to include an outer steel jacket around the 

8 tank car and thermal protection, full-height head 

9 shields and high-flow capacity pressure relief valves; 

10 and 

11 (2) require additional safety upgrades to tank 

12 cars built after October 2011 by including installa13 tion of high-flow-capacity relief valves and design 

14 modifications to prevent bottom outlets from open15 ing in the case of an accident. 

16 (b) SECURITY ENHANCEMENTS.—Not later than 1 

17 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Adminis18 trator of the Transportation Security Administration shall 

19 issue such regulations as are necessary to enhance the se20 curity of tank cars by requiring that all rail safety coordi21 nators ensure that no tank car containing crude oil is left 

22 unattended during any period of time that such tank car 

23 is being transferred between railroad carriers or between 

24 a railroad carrier and a shipper. 

25 (c) PHASE OUT PLAN.—Not later than 1 year after 

26 the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of TransVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:04 Apr 17, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1789.IH H1789

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1789 IH

1 portation shall submit a plan to the appropriate commit2 tees of Congress to phase out, on an aggressive basis, 

3 older-model DOT–111 tank cars used to move flammable 

4 liquids that are not retrofitted to meet new Federal re5 quirements established under this section. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

____________________________________

)

ALVIN B. TRUESDALE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 08-1862 (PLF)

)

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT )

OF JUSTICE et al., )

)

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

ORDER

For the reasons stated in the accompanying Opinion, it is hereby

ORDERED that plaintiff’s motions to strike [Dkt. #21, 22, 34, 36], for a

committee investigation [Dkt. #27], for fraud upon the court [Dkt. #28], to disqualify counsel

[Dkt. #31], for sanctions [Dkt. #32], to continue [Dkt. #33], for entry of default [Dkt. #35], to

compel [Dkt. #37], for a pre-trial conference by audio-video connection [Dkt. #43], and to amend

the complaint [Dkt. #44] are DENIED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that defendants’ motion to dismiss [Dkt. #10] is

GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART WITHOUT PREJUDICE. All claims except for

plaintiff’s FOIA and Privacy Act claims are dismissed, and all parties except the United States

Department of Justice are dismissed; and it is
2

FURTHER ORDERED that on or before October 30, 2009, the parties shall

propose a schedule in writing as to how they wish to proceed in this case. 

SO ORDERED.

/s/ 

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN

DATE: September 29, 2009 United States District Judge