alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 U.S. Dairy Forage Research Center: Madison, WI
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Archives
                        Presentations
                                    World Dairy Expo
                                    Newsletters and Research Summaries
                    Resources
                        General Resources
                                    Books
                                    Teacher's Resources
                                    New Research Dairy Updates
                                    Integrated Research at USDFRCSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Madison, Wisconsin U.S. Dairy Forage Research Center Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications
- IACUC Summaries - Milwaukee, WI Aquaculture
- IACUC Summaries - US Dairy Forage Research Center

Collaborations The U.S. Dairy Forage Research Center has a long and productive history of collaborative research involving stakeholders.  Current collaborators and projects:


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
AO 455 (Rev. 01/09) Waiverofan Indictment 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

United States of America 

v. 

Nicholas Reece Jacobson 

Defendant 

for the 

District of Oregon 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 6:16-CR-00071-AA-2 

WAIVER OF AN INDICTMENT 

I understand that I have been accused of one or more offenses punishable by imprisonment for more than one 

year. I was advised in open court of my rights and the nature of the proposed charges against me. 

After receiving this advice, I waive my right to prosecution by indictment and consent to prosecution by 

information. 

Date: 03/16/2016 

c:.. 

Signature of defendant's attorney 

~ .c""<-. w~"' N'" -Jr l,.awre A. Fi11e Mo1 o 

Judge's signature 

Ann Aiken, U.S. District Court Judge 

Judge's printed name and title 

I 

i 

\ 

Case 6:16-cr-00071-AA Document 36 Filed 03/16/16 Page 1 of 1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


To Intelligroup, Inc.:

        As   independent   public   accountants,   we  hereby   consent  to  the
incorporation  by reference of our report  included in this Form 10-K,  into the
Company's   previously  filed  Registration   Statement  File  Nos.   333-11486,
333-31809, 333-56143, 333-67583, 333-73051 and 333-94285.



                                             /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP

                                             ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Roseland, New Jersey
March 29, 2000
Definition of documents Definition of documents

• Strategic Plan – GCMRC “internal” 

document covering a 5 year period

• Core Monitoring Plan – A 10+ year 

framework of essential monitoring 

activities

• Research Plan – a 10+ year framew

- Experimental actions- RIN’s- Research and development
Preliminary hoopnet data from LCR to Unkar (RM 60.5 – 73.0)

Pre Flood Catches by 

Location 

 

Location HBC FMS BHS RBT BNT FHM 

LCR 208 4 3 3 0 3

Tanner 92 9 4 1 0 5

Unkar 12 15 2 3 3 0

 

Total Pre 312 28 9 7 3 8

Post Flood Catches by 

Location 

Location HBC FMS BHS RBT BNT FHM 

LCR 75 5 2 0 0 6

Tanner 26 1 2 0 0 3

Unkar 13 5 1 4 0 0

 

Total Post 114 11 5 4 0 9

Post/Pre Fraction 

Location HBC FMS BHS RBT BNT FHM 

LCR 36% 125% 67% 0% 200%

Tanner 28% 11% 50% 0% 60%

Unkar 108% 33% 50% 133% 0% 

 

Total Post 37% 39% 56% 57% 0% 113%

Catches for all species except fathead minnows were reduced following the high flow 

test. 
Length frequency relative abundances of HBC showed a slight shift upward following the 

high test flow. Data shown are for all sites combined. (courtesy L. Coggins, USGS, 

GCMRC).

Pre and post flood length frequency relative abundances of humpback 

chub at Hopi Salt, Tanner and Unkar sampling sites combined

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

30507090

110130150170190210230250270290310330350370390410430

Total length (mm)

Abundance of fish

Pre-flood Post-flood 

Pre and post flood length frequency relative abundances of humpback 

chub at Hopi Salt, Tanner and Unkar sampling sites combined

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0.14

0.16

0.18

0.2

30507090

110130150170190210230250270290310330350370390410430

Total length (mm)

Proportion of fis

h

Pre-flood Post-flood 
Pre and post flood length frequency relative abundances of humpback 

chub at Hopi Salt, Tanner and Unkar sampling sites combined

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

30507090

110130150170190210230250270290310330350370390410430

Total length (mm)

Proportion of fis

h

Pre-flood Post-flood
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

CASTILLO GRAND HOTEL CONDOMINIUM RESIDENCES 

ASSOCIATION, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

WATERMARK CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC and HOTEL OWNER

CWI-GG RCFL PROPERTY OWNER,

Appellees.

No. 4D2023-1587

[July 3, 2024]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Michael A. Robinson, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE19-

021992.

Joseph David Garrity of Lorium Law, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Christopher D. Donovan, Bonita Springs, and Jodi Kleinick and James 

L. Ferguson of Paul Hastings LLP, New York, New York, and William K. 

Whitner and Eric D. Stolze of Paul Hastings LLP, Atlanta, Georgia, Marc 

Huling and Carlianne K. Peake of Roetzel & Andress, LPA, Naples, for 

appellee, Hotel Owner CWI-GG RCFL Property Owner.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, LEVINE and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
##### 



Exhibit 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Wilsons The Leather Experts Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements No. 333-29837, No. 333-70793, No. 333-79301, and 333-39304 on Form
S-8 and No. 333-87094, No. 333-89702, No. 333-85049 and 333-82504 on Form S-3
of Wilsons The Leather Experts Inc., of our report dated April 18, 2003, with
respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Wilsons The Leather Experts Inc.
as of February 1, 2003 and February 2, 2002 and the related consolidated
statements of operations, shareholders equity and cash flows, and the related
consolidated financial statement schedule for each of the three fiscal years in
the period ended February 1, 2003, which report appears in the February 1, 2003
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Wilsons The Leather Experts Inc.

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, effective
February 3, 2002, the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.

As discussed in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements, the
Companys consolidated balance sheet as of February 2, 2002 and the
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders equity and cash flows for
each of the two fiscal years then ended, which were previously audited by other
independent auditors who have ceased operations, have been restated.

/S/ KPMG LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
May 2, 2003
#### In Re: Terence Keith JOHNSON, Petitioner.

No. 07-1104.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 31, 2007.

Decided: June 5, 2007.

Terence Keith Johnson, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Terence Keith Johnson petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to vacate a prefiling review order. We conclude that Johnson is not entitled to mandamus relief.

Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. *In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n,*860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir.1988). Further, mandamus is a drastic remedy and should only be used in extraordinary circumstances. *Kerr v. United States Dist. Court,*426 U.S. 394, 402, 96 S.Ct. 2119, 48 L.Ed.2d 725 (1976); *In re Beard,*811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir.1987). Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. *In re United Steelworkers,*595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir.1979).

The relief sought by Johnson is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of CD&L, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Albert W. Van Ness, Jr., Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the
               Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated results of
               operations of the Company for the periods presented.

Dated: May 15, 2006


                                                 \s\ Albert W. Van Ness, Jr.
                                                  --------------------------
                                                 Albert W. Van Ness, Jr.
                                                 Chief Executive Officer



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
10-Q or as separate disclosure statement.
Exhibit 21.01

SUBSIDIARIES* OF CARAUSTAR INDUSTRIES, INC.



|                                                     |  |                       |  |                   
|---------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------- |  | ------------------
|NAME                                                 |  | STATE OFINCORPORATION |  | TRADE, D/B/A Names
|Austell Holding Company, LLC                         |  | Georgia               |  |                   
|Camden Paperboard Corporation                        |  | New Jersey            |  |                   
|Caraustar, G.P. (a general partnership)              |  | South Carolina        |  |                   
|Caraustar Custom Packaging Group, Inc.               |  | Delaware              |  |                   
|Caraustar Custom Packaging Group (Maryland), Inc.    |  | Maryland              |  |                   
|Caraustar Design Tubes, Inc.                         |  | Canada                |  |                   
|Caraustar Industrial Canada, Inc.                    |  | Canada                |  |                   
|Caraustar Industrial & Consumer Products Group, Inc. |  | Delaware              |  |                   
|Caraustar Industrial & Consumer Products Group, Ltd. |  | Leyland, Lancaster,   |  |                   
|                                                     |  | United Kingdom        |  |                   
|Caraustar Mill Group, Inc.                           |  | Ohio                  |  |                   
|Caraustar Recovered Fiber Group, Inc.                |  | Delaware              |  |                   
|Chicago Paperboard Corporation                       |  | Illinois              |  |                   
|Caraustar Canada, Inc.                               |  | Canada                |  |                   
|Federal Transport, Inc.                              |  | Ohio                  |  |                   
|Gypsum MGC, Inc.                                     |  | Delaware              |  |                   
|Halifax Paper Board Company, Inc.                    |  | North Carolina        |  |                   
|McQueeney Gypsum Company                             |  | Delaware              |  |                   
|McQueeney Gypsum Company, LLC                        |  | Delaware              |  |                   
|Paragon Plastics, Inc.                               |  | South Carolina        |  |                   
|PBL Inc.                                             |  | Delaware              |  | **                
|RECCMG, LLC.                                         |  | Georgia               |  |                   
|Sprague Paperboard, Inc.                             |  | Connecticut           |  |                   

---

|* | Each subsidiary is wholly-owned (directly or, indirectly) by Caraustar Industries, Inc. unless otherwise indicated.
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|** | Does business in Indiana as PBL Indiana Inc.
|-- | --------------------------------------------
1 –ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

TONY FRENCH,

Plaintiff, Civ. No. 2:15-cv-02431-CL

 Civ. No. 2:15-cv-02432-CL

v. Civ. No. 2:15-cv-02433-CL

Civ. No. 2:15-cv-02435-CL

CAPTAIN TURNER, et al., Civ. No. 2:15-cv-02436-CL

Defendants. ORDER 

 

_____________________________

MCSHANE, Judge:

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Findings and Recommendation in each of the 

above cases filed by plaintiff Tony French. The matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. Although plaintiff did not file objections, I reviewed the legal 

principles de novo. United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). I find no 

error and conclude the reports are correct. 

Although plaintiff did not file objections, he filed a motion to disqualify Judge Clarke 

and a Second Amended Complaint. The motion to disqualify does not put forth any facts 

Case 2:15-cv-02435-CL Document 12 Filed 06/29/16 Page 1 of 2
2 –ORDER

indicating even the appearance of bias. Instead, French simply states that for some unstated 

reason, Judge Clarke will not give him a fair trial. This bare allegation, without more, is 

meritless. Magistrate Judge Clarke’s Findings and Recommendations are adopted. The Second 

Amended Complaints are similar to the earlier complaints, largely illegible, and do not address 

the deficiencies pointed out by Judge Clarke. As further leave to amend would be futile, this 

action is DISMISSED with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 29th day of June, 2016.

_______/s/ Michael J. McShane ________

Michael McShane

United States District Judge

Case 2:15-cv-02435-CL Document 12 Filed 06/29/16 Page 2 of 2
SCWC-12-0000061
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

DANA NAONE HALL, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs. DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES, BOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES, WILLIAM J. AILA, JR., in his official capacity as chairperson of the Board of Land and Natural Resources and as the State Historic Preservation Officer, PUAALAOKALANI AIU, in her official capacity as administrator of the State Historic Preservation Division, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, LORETTA J. FUDDY in her official capacity as the Director of the Department of Health, ALVIN T. ONAKA in his official capacity as State Registrar of Vital Statistics and Chief of the Department of Health’s Office of Health Status Monitoring, KAWAIAHA# O CHURCH, WILLIAM HAOLE in his official capacity as the Chair of the Board of Trustees and Chair of the Board of Directors of Kawaiaha # o Church,

Petitioners/Defendants-Appellees.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0000061; CIV. NO. 09-1-1828) Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0000061 04-JUN-2013 10:47 AMORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and McKenna, JJ. and Circuit Judge Wilson, in place of Pollack, J., recused)

Petitioners/Defendants-Appellees’ application for writ of certiorari filed on April 22, 2013, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, June 4, 2013. James Kawashima, Michael A. Lorusso and Tracie M. Kobayashi for petitioners /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Michael D. Wilson

2
Exhibit 31.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-15(e) OR 15d-15(e) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I, Matthew P. Dwyer, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Total Identity Corp.;
  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the year covered by this report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the years presented in this report;
  4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the year in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
 about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the year covered by this report based on such evaluation;
 and
 
 c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
 business issuers fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers
 internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
 over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or
 persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
 reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
 internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date: May 5 , 2004
 
 By:/s/ Matthew P. DwyerChief Executive Officer
#### BALL, Appellant,, v. BALL et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 16, 1896.)

Action by Jasper C. Ball against Alvin Ball and Edgar Ball.

No opinion. Order affirmed, without costs. All concur.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Claudia Ribar, Respondent, v County of Suffolk, Appellant. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

— Casey, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed February 11, 1986.

The employer objects to the finding of dual and similar employment made by the Workers’ Compensation Board. Claimant sustained neck and back injuries when she fell while working as chairperson of election inspectors at a polling place in Suffolk County on primary day in 1983. In her regular, full-time employment, claimant worked for a lawyer as his legal secretary/office manager. The Board’s finding of dual and similar employment is based upon its conclusion that her duties as an election inspector and as a legal secretary/ office manager were clerical in nature, involving tallying, filing and record keeping.

The employer points to certain evidence in the record to support its contention that claimant’s duties in her employ*802ment with the lawyer involved a great deal more skill and responsibility than her purely clerical duties as an election inspector. In view of the Board’s broad power to determine factual issues and draw inferences from the evidence *(see, e.g., Matter of Hill v Thompson,*61 NY2d 1018; *Matter of Schwartz v Howard, Needles, Tannen & Bergendorf,*93 AD2d 930), we conclude that the Board’s decision finding the duties of both jobs to be essentially clerical in nature cannot be disturbed. On appeal from a decision of the Board, the question is not whether the evidence supports a finding other than that made by the Board. Nor is it relevant whether this court agrees with the Board’s findings. Rather, the sole issue is whether there is substantial evidence in the record to support the Board’s decision *(see, Matter of Johnson v Moog, Inc.,*114 AD2d 538; *Matter of Haydel v Sears, Roebuck & Co.,*106 AD2d 759). Since there is such support for the Board’s decision herein, it must be affirmed.

Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workers’ Compensation Board. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Casey, Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.