alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
JEFFREY H. BAIRD, OSB #932058 

Dellert Baird Law Offices, PLLC 

P.O. Box 97031 

Lakewood, WA 98497 

Telephone: (360) 329-6968 

FAX: (360) 329-6968 

jeffreyhbaird@comcast.net 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

STEVEN LEWIS, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

NANCY A. BERRYHILL, 

Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 

Defendant. 

Civil No. 3:16-CV-00241-BR 

STIPULATED MOTION FOR ATTORNEY 

FEES PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(D) 

Based upon the Stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ordered that attorney fees in the 

amount of $6,878.68, and expenses in the amount of $22.35, for a total of $6,901.03, shall be 

awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (EAJA). 

If it is determined that Plaintiffs EAJA fees are not subject to any offset allowed under 

the Department of the Treasury's Offset Program, see Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010), 

then the check for EAJA fees shall be made payable to Dellert Baird Law Offices, PLLC, based 

upon Plaintiffs assignment of this fee to her attorney. Any check for EAJA fees shall be mailed 

to Plaintiffs counsel at Dellert Baird Law Offices, PLLC, P.O. Box 97301, Lakewood, WA, 

98497. 

Page 1 [3 :16-CV-00241-BR] ORDER 

Case 3:16-cv-00241-BR Document 16 Filed 03/03/17 Page 1 of 2
IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATEDthis ~ dayof ~ , 2016. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Page 2 [3 :16-CV-00241-BR] ORDER 

Case 3:16-cv-00241-BR Document 16 Filed 03/03/17 Page 2 of 2
Bruce W. Brewer, OSB No. 925581

brucebrewerusdccases@gmail.com

PO Box 421

West Linn, OR 97068

503-621-6633

Attorney for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON

VU BUI, Case No. 3:15-cv-01431-HZ

Plaintiff, 

 ORDER (EAJA FEES)

vs.

COMMISSIONER,

of Social Security

Administration,

Defendant.

_____________________________________

Based upon the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that, pursuant to the

Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, an attorney fee in the amount of $5,461.03 is

awarded to Plaintiff. It is ordered that the aforementioned attorney fee will be paid to Plaintiff’s

attorney, dependent upon verification that Plaintiff has no debt which qualifies for offset against

the awarded fees, pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff, 130

S.Ct. 2521 (2010). 

1 - ORDER FOR EAJA FEES

Case 3:15-cv-01431-HZ Document 23 Filed 10/04/16 Page 1 of 2 Case 3:15-cv-01431-HZ Document 24 Filed 10/28/16 Page 1 of 2
If Plaintiff has no such debt, then the check shall be made payable to Plaintiff’s attorney, Bruce

Brewer, and mailed to him at PO Box 421, West Linn, OR 97068. If Plaintiff has such debt, then

the check for any remaining funds after offset of the debt shall be made payable to Plaintiff and

mailed to Plaintiff's attorney's mailing address stated above. There are no costs or expenses to be

paid herein.

DATED this _____ day of ______________________, 2016.

____________________________________

The Honorable Marco A. Hernandez

United States District Court Judge

Submitted by:

Bruce W. Brewer, OSB No. 925581

503-621-6633, Attorney for Plaintiff 

2 - ORDER FOR EAJA FEES

Case 3:15-cv-01431-HZ Document 23 Filed 10/04/16 Page 2 of 2 Case 3:15-cv-01431-HZ Document 24 Filed 10/28/16 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



The Board of Directors
    LCC International, Inc.


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-17803) on Form S-8 of LCC International, Inc. of our report dated April 15,
1997, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of LCC International, Inc.
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1995 and 1996, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, shareholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for 
each of the years in the three year-period ended December 31, 1996, and         
related schedule,  which report appears in the December 31, 1996, annual report
on Form 10-K of LCC International, Inc.



Washington, DC                                    /s/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
April 15, 1997
#### Scott, *et al. v.*First Nat. Bank of Cleveland

*Bill for Discovery.*

(Decided June 29, 1912.

59 South. 303.)

1. *Appeal and Error; Judgment; Appealable; Interlocutory Decree; Time.*— Where a decree is rendered on demurrer to a bill it is interlocutory and an appeal therefrom must be taken within thirty days from the rendition; if taken after that time it will be dismissed.

2. *Same; Denial of Motion to Strike.*— No appeal lies from a decree overruling a motion to strike parts of a bill, although included in a decree on demurrer to the bill.

Appeal from Montgomery City Court.

Heard before Hon. William H. Ti-iomas.

Bill by First National Bank of Cleveland, Ohio, against Charles A. Scott, and others, for discovery and relief. From a decree overruling demurrers to the bill, respondents appeal.

Appeal dismissed.

Daniel W. Troy, for appellant.

On the question of the right to take the appeal when taken, and as against the motion to dismiss the appeal, it seems sufficient to *cite.*— Alexander *v.*Bales, 127 Ala. 328; Sims. Ch. Cr. sec. 421. Under the allegations of the bill it could not stand except as a creditor’s bill, and can rest only on section 3740. The interrogatories were properly reached by motion to *strike.*— Ohardavoyne *v. Galbraith,*81 Ala. 522.

Ball & Samford, and J. E. Parsons, for appellee.

The bill is a good bill for discovery and *relief.*— Kinney *v. Reeves,*142 Ala. 604; sections 3735, 3740, 3742, Code 1907. The appeal was from an interlocutory judgment or decree, and should have been taken within thirty *273days, but in fact, was not taken for more than six months, and should therefore be dismissed. — Sec. 2838, Code 1907.

DOWDELL, C. J.

The appeal in this case is prosecuted from a decree on demurrers to the bill. The decree is purely interlocutory, and from which an appeal is authorized by the statute within 30 days from its rendition. The present appeal was not taken until long after the expiration of 30 days. The motion, therefore, to dismiss the appeal must prevail.

No appeal lies from a decree overruling a motion to strike parts of a bill; and the fact that the decree here appealed from embraced such a ruling is of no consequence.

Appeal dismissed.

All the Justices concur.
##### 



EXHIBIT 13.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Bernard Charlès, President and Chief Executive Officer of Dassault Systèmes,
a société anonymeorganized under French law (DASSAULT SYSTEMES), certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:  (i)
    
    the Annual Report of Dassault Systèmes on Form 20-F for the
fiscal year ended 31 December 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Dassault Systèmes. This certification will not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section. This certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, except to the extent that Dassault Systèmes specifically incorporates
it by reference. Date:  June 30, 2004 By:
    /s/  Bernard CharlèsName:
    Bernard CharlèsTitle:
    President and Chief Executive Officer 1




---



##### 



Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Thibault de Tersant, Executive Vice President Finance and Legal and Chief
Financial Officer of Dassault Systèmes, a société anonymeorganized under
French law (Dassault Systèmes), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge, that:  (i)
    
    the Annual Report of Dassault Systèmes on Form 20-F for the
fiscal year ended 31 December 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Dassault Systèmes. This certification will not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section. This certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, except to the extent that Dassault Systèmes specifically incorporates
it by reference. Date:  June 30, 2004 By:
    /s/  Thibault de TersantName:
    Thibault de TersantTitle:
    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 2
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



To Intelligroup, Inc.:

     We consent to the  incorporation by reference in  Intelligroup, Inc.'s (the
"Company")  Registration  Statement File Nos. 333-11486,  333-31809,  333-56143,
333-67583,  333-73051,  333-94285 and 333-70244 of our report dated February 10,
2003, relating to the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and
for the year ended  December 31, 2002 (which  report  expresses  an  unqualified
opinion and includes an  explanatory  paragraph  relating to the  application of
procedures  relating to certain disclosures and  reclassifications  of financial
statement  amounts  related to the 2001 and 2000 financial  statements that were
audited  by other  auditors  who have  ceased  operations  and for which we have
expressed no opinion or other form of assurance  other than with respect to such
disclosures and reclassifications)  appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2002.



                                                     DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Parsippany, New Jersey
March 27, 2003
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John R. Judd, certify that:

      1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of ATS Medical,
            Inc.; and

      2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
            statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact
            necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
            under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
            to the period covered by this report.

Date:  March 21, 2005

       /s/  John R. Judd
       ------------------------------
Name:  John R. Judd
Title: Chief Financial Officer

                                       6
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<CIK>                               0000833054
<NAME>                              GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED PSHIP II-C

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                   204,820
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                            244,751
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         449,571
<PP&E>                                 9,295,714
<DEPRECIATION>                         8,070,164
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         1,804,785
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     58,655
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                             1,692,067
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           1,804,785
<SALES>                                1,296,468
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       1,305,587
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            804,216
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          501,371
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      501,371
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                             501,371
<EPS-BASIC>                                 2.82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
CHIEF JUSTICE

 ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

 NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

 DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

 GINA M. BENAVIDES

 GREGORY T. PERKES

 NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

 CECILE FOY GSANGER

NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361-888-0416 (TEL)

361-888-0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLOOR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 78539

956-318-2405 (TEL)

956-318-2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa

Court of Appeals 

Thirteenth District of Texas 

June 29, 2015

Hon. Gilbert Lozano

District Clerk

546 W. Hidalgo Ave.

Raymondville, TX 78580

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13-13-00257-CV

Tr.Ct.No. 2009-CV-0010-A

Style: VIVIANA SOSA, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE 

ESTATE OF DESTINY SOSA, A DECEASED CHILD, AND JESSE SOSA v. 

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY AND ERNESTO ORTEGON

The judgment of the trial court in the above cause was REVERSED AND REMANDED

by this Court on the 5/14/2015. The mandate is enclosed.

Costs of the appeal were adjudged against appellees, UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD 

COMPANY AND ERNESTO ORTEGON. 

Pursuant to Section 51.204(b) of the Government Code, the attorneys of record are 

hereby notified that any exhibits submitted to the Court by a party may be withdrawn by that 

party or the party’s attorney of record within 30 days. Exhibits on file with the Court will be 

destroyed three (3) years after final disposition of the case or at an earlier date if ordered by the 

Court.

Very truly yours,

Cecile Foy Gsanger, Clerk

CFG:ch

Enc.

cc: Hon. J. Lynn Watson (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Hon. Marc G. Rosenthal (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Hon. Norton A. Colvin Jr. (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Hon. David I. Schoen (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Hon. Mitchell Craig Chaney (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Hon. Kent Geoffrey Rutter (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)
MATTHEW SCHINDLER, OSB# 964190 

501 Fourth Street #324 

Lake Oswego, OR 97034 

Phone: (503) 699-7333 

FAX: (503) 345-9372 

e-mail: mattschindler@comcast.net 

ST AND BY COUNSEL FOR PRO SE DEFENDANT KENNETH MEDENBACH 

UNITED ST A TES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

EUGENE DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

Case No. 1:15-CR-00407-MC 

vs. 

KENNETH MEDENBACH, 

Defendant( s ). 

ORDER 

Pro se defendant Kenneth Medenbach has moved the court to revoke the 

detention order entered on January 21, 2016 in this matter. 

Having considered the motion and the positions of the parties, the court 

grants the defendant's motion. 

Therefore IT IS ORDERED that defendant be released on this matter on July 

15, 2016. 

Page I - ORDER 

DATED this _f_ day of J"' 0L ~ 

Honorable Michael McShane 

United States District Judge 

'2016.
6:15-cv-2364

Case 6:15-cv-02364-AA Document 1 Filed 12/18/15 Page 1 of 4
Case 6:15-cv-02364-AA Document 1 Filed 12/18/15 Page 2 of 4
Case 6:15-cv-02364-AA Document 1 Filed 12/18/15 Page 3 of 4
Case 6:15-cv-02364-AA Document 1 Filed 12/18/15 Page 4 of 4
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of American Metal & Technology, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Chen Gao, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








Date:  April 9, 2010
By:
/s/ Chen GaoName: Chen GaoTitle: Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
#### United Investors Corporation of Connecticut *v.*Old Lyme Associates Corporation et al.

*Ralph P. Dupont,*in support of the motion.

Submitted July 11

decided July 23, 1975

The motion by the named defendant for a review of the trial court’s order terminating a stay of execution in the appeal from the Superior Court in New London County is granted and the relief sought therein is denied.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

November 27, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00411

- CV

REPSOL OIL AND GA S USA, LLC as successor of Talisman Energy USA Inc, Statoil Texas

Ons hore Properties, LLC, and Statoil Pipelines, LLC, and OGE, LLC

, Appellant s

v.

MATRIX PETROLEUM, LLC, Matrix Petroleum Holdings LLC, JAR Resources Holdings, L.P., and TMRX Petroleum, LLC, Appellee s

From the 218th Judicial District Court, La Salle Count y, Texas
Trial Court No. 14

- 08

- 00158

- CVL Honorable Russell Wilson, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The parties’ joint motion for a second extension of time to file appellants’ brief is granted. We order the appellants' briefs due January 20, 2020. No further extensions of time will be granted absent a timely motion that (1) demonstrates extraordinary circumstances justifying further delay, ( 2) advises the court of the efforts counsel has expended in preparing the brief, and (3) provides the court reasonable assurance that the brief will be completed and filed by the requested extended deadline. The court does not generally consider a heavy wo rk schedule to be an extraordinary circumstance.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 27th day of November, 2019

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
Technical Work Group Meeting

FINAL AGENDA

Glen Canyon Dam

Adaptive Management Program

Technical Work Group Meeting

Bureau of Indian Affairs

2 Arizona Center, 400 N. 5th St., Phoenix AZ

12th Floor, Conference Rooms A&B

May 28, 2003

START

TIME TOPIC PERSON PURPOSE MATERIALS

1 p.m. Welcome and

Administrative

Kurt Dongoske

1. Introductions and

Determination of Quorum

2. Review Action Items from

Feb. 26-27, 2003 Meeting

3. Approval of Feb. 26-27, 2003

Meeting Minutes

Agenda

Action Items

Draft Minutes

Feb. 26-27, 2003

1:15 p.m.

Check Dams and Gully

Erosion in Grand

Canyon Report

Joel Pederson Information and Discussion Reports

2:20 p.m. Synopsis of

Management

Objectives Workshop

Lee Failing Information and Discussion

3 p.m. HBC AHG Update Steve Gloss Information and Discussion Appendix B

in Interim

HBC AHG

Report

3:15 p.m. Recovery

Implementation Plan

Concept

Clayton Palmer Information and Discussion RIP Concept

3:30 BREAK

3:50 p.m. Tribal Consultation Plan Dean Saugee

Loretta Jackson

Information and Discussion Tribal

Consultation

Plan

4:35 p.m. GCMRC Survey PEP

Report

Mike Liszewski

Raad Saleh

Information Reports

5 p.m. Wrap-up and Adjourn Kurt Dongoske
Technical Work Group Meeting

FINAL AGENDA

Glen Canyon Dam

Adaptive Management Program

Technical Work Group Meeting

Bureau of Indian Affairs

2 Arizona Center, 400 N. 5th St., Phoenix AZ

12th Floor, Conference Rooms A&B

May 30, 2003

START

TIME TOPIC PERSON PURPOSE MATERIALS

8:10 a.m. Welcome and

Administrative

Kurt Dongoske Introductions

Determination of Quorum

Agenda

8:15 a.m. Status of Paria River Early

Alert Network

Jeffrey Phillips Information and Discussion Reports

9:20 a.m. Budget Ad Hoc Group

Report

Dennis Kubly

Denny Fenn

Information and Discussion

10 a.m. B R E A K

10:15 a.m. FY 2004 Budget and

Work Plan (cont.)

Steve Gloss Information and Discussion

Recommendation to AMWG?

FY 2004

Budget

11:40 a.m. Long-range Planning/

AMWG Directive

Steve Gloss Information and Discussion

11:55 a.m. Ad Hoc Committee for

What’s In and Out of AMP

(ACHIO) Report

Randy Seaholm

Mary Orton

Information and Discussion

Recommendation to AMWG

AHCIO

Report

12:15 p.m. Wrap-up and Adjourn

- next TWG Meeting

and agenda

Kurt Dongoske Discussion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

PARIS RENE POSTON, 

Plaintiff, 

V. 

NANCY A. BERRYHILL, 

ACTING COMMISSIONER 

OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 

Defendant. 

CLARKE, Magistrate Judge. 

EUGENE DIVISION 

Civ. No. 6:15-cv-02389-CL 

ORDER 

Based upon the stipulation of the parties (#21 ), it is hereby ORDERED that 

attorney fees in the amount of $5,007.28 shall be awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to the Equal 

Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. The parties agree that attorney fees will be 

paid to Plaintiffs attorney, dependent upon verification that Plaintiff has no debt which 

qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as 

discussed in Astrue v. Ratl~IJ, 130 S. Ct. 2521 (2010). If Plaintiff has no such debt, then 

the check shall be made out to Plaintiff's attorney and mailed to Plaintiff's attorney's 

office as follows: Juliana Coons, P.O. Box 72322, Springfield, OR 97475. If Plaintiff 

has a debt, then the check for any remaining funds after offset of the debt shall be 

made to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff's attorney's office at the address stated above. 

Page I - ORDER 

Case 6:15-cv-02389-CL Document 22 Filed 03/22/17 Page 1 of 2
There are no documented costs or expenses to be paid herein. 

>2---

DA TED this day of March, 2017 . 

. // -~Z---· ~~~~~~~~~- MARK D. CLARKE 

United States Magistrate Judge 

Page 2- ORDER 

Case 6:15-cv-02389-CL Document 22 Filed 03/22/17 Page 2 of 2
Denied and Opinion Filed November 20, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-20-00964-CV

IN RE COMMONWEALTH ENTERTAINMENT GROUP LLC 

FORMERLY D/B/A BUNGALOW NOW D/B/A XOXO SOCIAL, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 193rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-16251

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Whitehill, Pedersen, III, and Carlyle

Opinion by Justice Carlyle

In its November 6, 2020 petition for writ of mandamus and emergency motion 

for temporary relief, relator challenges the trial court’s determination not to extend 

a temporary restraining order enjoining real parties in interest from enforcing their

emergency suspension order. On November 10, 2020, relator filed a motion to 

dismiss, advising us that the administrative law judge has issued a ruling rendering

this original proceeding moot. We grant the motion and dismiss the petition. Having 
–2–

dismissed the petition, we also deny the emergency motion as moot.

200964F.P05

/Cory L. Carlyle/

CORY L. CARLYLE

JUSTICE