alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Buckner Woodford, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Kentucky Bancshares,
Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
quarterly report is being prepared;
(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting; and


5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting.
Date:   November 15, 2004
BY  /s/ Buckner Woodford
Buckner Woodford
President & Chief Executive Officer
2
Lexlibrary/197885.1
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-10251

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Jimmy Steele, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:08-CR-87-1

Before Jolly, Elrod, and Graves, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

A jury found Jimmy Steele, federal prisoner # 36989-177, guilty of 

possession with the intent to distribute 500 grams or more of a substance 

containing cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B), possession 

of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking offense in violation of 18 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 8, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-10251 Document: 00515929894 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/08/2021
No. 20-10251

2

U.S.C. § 924(c), and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation 

of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). He was sentenced as a career offender to a total of 

360 months of imprisonment and eight years of supervised release. He 

appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for compassionate release or 

for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) and the denial of 

his motion for reconsideration. 

We review a district court’s decision denying a motion for 

compassionate release and a motion for reconsideration for an abuse of 

discretion. United States v. Chambliss, 948 F.3d 691, 693 (5th Cir. 2020); 

United States v. Rabhan, 540 F.3d 344, 346-47 (5th Cir. 2008). A district 

court abuses its discretion if it bases its decision on an error of law or a clearly 

erroneous assessment of the evidence. United States v. Henderson, 636 F.3d 

713, 717 (5th Cir. 2011). 

While the district court discussed U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13 in its order, there 

is nothing in the record to indicate that it felt bound by this policy statement

and its commentary. Instead, the record shows that the district court’s denial 

of relief was also based on its balancing of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors and 

that the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying the motion. See 

United States v. Shkambi, 993 F.3d 388, 393 (5th Cir. 2021); Chambliss, 948 

F.3d at 693. Steele’s arguments amount to a disagreement with the district 

court’s weighing of the § 3553(a) factors, which does not suffice to show 

error. See Chambliss, 948 F.3d at 694. Furthermore, Steele has not shown 

that the district court abused its discretion in denying his motion to 

reconsider. See Rabhan, 540 F.3d at 346-47.

Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED.

Case: 20-10251 Document: 00515929894 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/08/2021
#### In the Matter of County of Monroe, on Behalf of Monroe Community Hospital, Respondent, v David Axelrod, as Commissioner of the Department of Health of the State of New York, et al., Appellants.

— Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, proceeding converted to one for mandamus, and respondents directed to conduct an administrative hearing, in accordance with the following memorandum: Special Term, relying upon *Matter of Cortlandt Nursing Home v Axelrod*(99 AD2d 105), permanently enjoined respondents from recouping Medicaid reimbursement overpayments based upon the over 10-year delay between the time such payments were made and the notice of proposed recoupment. The Court of Appeals subsequently reversed *Cortlandt,*rejecting the view that a 10-year delay in reaching a final rate determination by an administrative agency is unreasonable as a matter of law *(Matter of Cortlandt Nursing Home v Axelrod,*66 NY2d 169, 177, *rearg denied*66 NY2d 1035, *cert denied*— US —, 106 S Ct 1971). It held that the passage of time, *982standing alone, does not serve as a basis for judicial intervention, with peremptory effect, into the administrative process and that it is for the administrative body in the first instance to determine upon a plenary hearing whether a period of delay is unreasonable *(Matter of Cortlandt Nursing Home v Axelrod, supra,*pp 177-180).

We agree with Special Term that, under the circumstances, petitioner was not required to exhaust its administrative remedies. Since, however, no administrative hearing was ever held in this matter, petitioner’s proceeding should be treated as one in the nature of mandamus to compel the Health Department to conduct a plenary hearing in accordance with governing regulations (10 NYCRR 86-2.7 *et seq.; Matter of Cortlandt Nursing Home v Axelrod, supra,*pp 180, 183). At such hearing, the agency should determine the cause of the delay, the interests implicated in the proceeding and whether substantial prejudice to the facility has resulted from the administrative delay *(Matter of Cortlandt Nursing Home v Axelrod, supra,*p 180). The agency should also determine whether the audit conducted here was timely within the six-year period specified in respondents’ own regulations *(see,*10 NYCRR 86-2.7 [c]). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Boehm, J. — injunction and declaratory judgment.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Denman and Schnepp, JJ.
#### BUEK et al., Respondents, v. METROPOLITAN EL. RY. CO. et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 6, 1896.)

Action by Charles Buek and others against the Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company and others.

B. Tolies,. for appellants.

W. G. Peckham, for respondents.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Agricultural Genetic Resources Preservation Research: Fort Collins, CO
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Fort Collins, Colorado Center for Agricultural Resources Research Agricultural Genetic Resources Preservation Research Docs Clonal







Ribes - Currant, Gooseberryheadline bar *Ribes* - Currant, Gooseberry  ProtocolsMedia RecipesTechnical Table


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
EXHIBIT 32.2



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Caremark Rx, Inc. (the Corporation) for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation,
certifies that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 8, 2005                                
|                                                    
|/s/ Peter J. Clemens IV                             
|Peter J. Clemens IV                                 
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Technical Work Group Meeting

F I N A L AGENDA

Glen Canyon Dam

Adaptive Management Program

Technical Work Group Meeting

Bureau of Indian Affairs

2 Arizona Center, 400 N. 5th Street, Phoenix AZ

Conference Rooms A&B

May 16, 2001

START

TIME TOPIC PERSON PURPOSE MATERIALS

9:30 a.m. Welcome and

Administrative

Kurt Dongoske 1. Introductions and

Determination of Quorum

2. Review Action Items from

Feb. 26-27, 2002, Meeting

3. Approval of Feb. 26-27, 2002,

Meeting Minutes

4. Legislative Updates

Agenda

Action Items

Draft Minutes

9:45 a.m. Basin Hydrology Tom Ryan Information Basin Hydrology

10 a.m. Experimental Flows

Update

Randy Peterson Information Experimental

Flows

11:45 a.m. Biological Opinion

Sufficient Progress and

TCD Update

Dennis Kubly Information

12 noon L U N C H

1 p.m. Sequencing of Information

Needs

• Information on

resource status and

trends 

• Paired comparison

exercise to put RINs

and SINs in sequence

order

Ad Hoc

Committee on

Strategic

Planning

GCMRC (SCORE

Report)

Mary Orton

Information

TWG Exercise

Resource Goals,

MOs, and INs

3:30 p.m. B R E A K 

3:45 p.m. Follow up and next steps

on sequencing

Mary Orton

4:45 p.m. Wrap-up and Adjourn Kurt Dongoske
Technical Work Group Meeting

F I N A L AGENDA

Glen Canyon Dam

Adaptive Management Program

Technical Work Group Meeting

Bureau of Indian Affairs

2 Arizona Center, 400 N. 5th Street, Phoenix AZ

Conference Rooms A&B

May 17, 2001

START

TIME TOPIC PERSON PURPOSE MATERIALS

8 a.m. Welcome and

Administrative

Kurt Dongoske Introductions

Determination of Quorum

Agenda

8:15 a.m. Cultural PEP Report Mary Barger Recommendation to AMWG Cultural PEP Report

10:15 a.m. B R E A K

10:30 a.m. Aquatic PEP Report Dennis Kubly Recommendation to AMWG Aquatic PEP Report

11 a.m. FY 2004 Annual

Work Plan and

Budget

GCMRC

Randy Peterson

Information FY 2004 Annual

Work Plan

11:30 a.m. L U N C H

12:30 p.m. Ad Hoc Group

Updates:

• Non-native Fish

Control

• Budget

• Exp. Flows

• Sediment

Rick Johnson

Randy Peterson

Randy Peterson

Ted Melis

Randy Peterson

Recommendation to AMWG

Information

Information

Information

Ad Hoc Group

Updates

1:30 p.m. 2001 Monitoring

Results

Ted Melis Information Information

2 p.m. Five-Year Lake

Powell Program

Steve Gloss Information

2:50 p.m. Wrap-up and

Adjourn

Kurt Dongoske 1. Future agenda items

2. Meeting Review
#### EX PARTE BOSWELL.

(Decided November 10, 1913.)

Original petition in the Supreme Court.

Smith & Wilkerson, for appellant.

R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, for the State.

Per curiam.

Writ awarded.
SCWC-11-0000587

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

IN THE MATTER OF MEGGAN MARIE PHARMER,

Mother for and on Behalf of HA

 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-11-0000587; FC-M NO. 09-1-0078)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ., and

Circuit Judge Wilson, in place of Acoba, J., recused)

The application for a writ of certiorari, filed on

October 12, 2012, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, November 20, 2012.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson 

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-11-0000587

20-NOV-2012

08:47 AM
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           5,704,033
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,704,033
<PP&E>                                          99,245,599
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,189,488
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 104,467,427
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,282,102
<BONDS>                                         44,068,248
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                      58,117,077
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   104,467,427
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,927,898
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,130,585
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   114,115
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,543,266
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,878,911
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,878,911
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,878,911
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       104.92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       104.92
        




</TABLE>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Mycotoxin Prevention and Applied Microbiology Research: Peoria, IL
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    NCAUR homepageSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Peoria, Illinois National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research Mycotoxin Prevention and Applied Microbiology Research People





- NCAUR Home Page
- MPM Home Page
- Personnel Listing

Zipporah  Sowell    Biological Science Lab Technician /ARSUserFiles/50100525/people/Headshot(1).jpg
 Phone: (309) 681-6295Fax: (309) 681-6672Room 1116USDA ARS NCAUR1815 N University St.Peoria IL 61604
 Zipporah Sowell is a proud alumna of the illustrious Tuskegee University, where she obtained her B.S in Plant & Soil Science. She is a Charlotte, NC native that served as a USDA 1890 Scholar sponsored by the Agricultural Research Service for two years. Zipporah now serves as a Biological Science Technician in Dr. Martha Vaughan’s lab where they conduct research focusing on eliminating mycotoxin contaminants produced by fungal plant pathogens. Furthermore, they analyze how climate change and agricultural production practices affect fungal disease severity. Outside of her laboratory career, she enjoys traveling, exercising, connecting with nature, and studying herbalism.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Merrill Schneider, OSB #77336 

merrillschneider@schneiderlaw.com 

Schneider Kerr & Robichaux 

PO Box 14490 

Portland, Oregon 97293 

Phone: 503-255-9092 

Fax: 503-255-9145 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

TYSON MCCOOL, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

NANCY BERRYHILL, 

Commissioner of Social Security, 

Defendant. 

3: 16-CV-00055-PK 

ORDER FOR A TTORL'IEY 

FEES UNDER42 U.S.C. § 406(b) 

The court finds and orders an attorney fee of $13,350.25 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). 

The attorney fee of $2,386.83 allowed pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act will be 

refunded to Plaintiff upon counsel's receipt of the allowed 406(b) fee awarded. 

Dated this 2.0ro( day of (}to~ , 2017. 

Pa 11 Papak 

Umted States Magistrate Judge