alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### CROZIER, Respondent, v. READ, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

November 20, 1896.)

Action by Sophia Crozier against George R. Read.

Joseph P. Daly, for appellant.

Frederick W. Sherman, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained from a collision of one of defendant’s horses with a wagon which the plaintiff was driving. On a previous trial there was a nonsuit. On appeal it was held by the late general term that the case should have been submitted to the jury, and the judgment entered on the nonsuit was reversed. 78 Hun, 181, 28 N. Y. Supp. 914. In the opinion there delivered by Mr. Justice Pratt we entirely concur. The facts as disclosed on the last trial do not vary materially from those presented at the former trial. The decision of the general term must, therefore, control the disposition of this appeal. We think it is too clear to require extended discussion that one aspect of the case presented a question of negligence for the jury. If the horses of the defendant were prancing across the road before the defendant’s *1111servant met the plaintiff's vehicle, the jury might well have found that the defendant’s driver should have passed plaintiff’s vehicle • at a distance sufficiently great to avoid any chance of the led horse colliding with the vehicle. In fact, from the number of reported cases in which accidents have arisen from this cause, and from our own observation, it would seem that there is generally danger of a led horse swerving, and the jury might find that it was the duty of one leading a horse through a village or' city street to have this danger in mind, and to take care to avoid collisions from this cause. When the plaintiff saw the horses approaching, she sought to escape an accident by driving along the extreme right of the highway. Had tbe_ defendant’s servant taken the same precaution, and gone well to his side of the road, which was clear of obstruction, the accident would not have happened. The judgment and order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

 v.

DUANE LEO EHMER, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-30242, 19-30077

D.C. No. 

3:16-cr-00051-BR-10

District of Oregon, 

Portland

ORDER

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

 v.

DARRYL WILLIAM THORN, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-30246, 19-30077

D.C. No. 

3:16-cr-00051-BR-22

District of Oregon, 

Portland

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

 v.

JAKE RYAN, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 18-30025, 19-30077

D.C. No. 3:16-cr-00051-BR-26

District of Oregon, 

Portland

FILED

APR 22 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

MH/Appellate Commissioner

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 2697 Filed 04/22/19 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

 v.

JASON PATRICK, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 18-30042, 19-30077

D.C. No. 3:16-cr-00051-BR-9

District of Oregon, 

Portland

Before: Peter L. Shaw, Appellate Commissioner.

Appellants’ motion (Dkt. Entry No. 16 in 17-30242, Dkt. Entry No. 2 in 19-

30077) is granted to consolidate their new joint appeal number 19-30077 with their

previously consolidated individual appeals, numbers 17-30242, 17-30246, 18-

30025, and 18-30042. The Clerk shall change this court’s docket to so reflect. The

previously established briefing schedule remains in effect.

MH/Appellate Commissioner 2 17-30242

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 2697 Filed 04/22/19 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND FOR THE TWELVE MONTH
PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 WHICH ARE INCLUDED IN THE  REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-K
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001016439
<NAME>                        Intelligroup, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         6,121
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  38,355
<ALLOWANCES>                                   3,292
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               62,117
<PP&E>                                         17,540
<DEPRECIATION>                                 6,120
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 83,062
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          32,984
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       160
<OTHER-SE>                                     48,494
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   83,062
<SALES>                                        186,067
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               186,067
<CGS>                                          119,857
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  190,858
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (113)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             706
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,384)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,206
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,590)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,590)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0.42 <F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.42 <F2>
<FN>
<F1>      This amount represents Basic Earnings per Share in accordance with the
          requirements of Statement of Financial  Accounting Standards No. 128 -
          "Earnings per Share".

<F2>      This amount  represents  Diluted Earnings per Share in accordance with
          the  requirements of Statement of Financial  Accounting  Standards No.
          128 - "Earnings per Share".
</FN>


</TABLE>
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1724 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to reduce Federal spending on 

surface transportation programs by limiting State and local taxation 

on purchases of construction materials made with funds made available 

from the Highway Trust Fund, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 26, 2015 

Mr. WESTERMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to reduce Federal 

spending on surface transportation programs by limiting 

State and local taxation on purchases of construction 

materials made with funds made available from the 

Highway Trust Fund, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Transportation Funds 

5 Exemption Act of 2015’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1724 IH

1 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF STATE AND LOCAL TAXES UNDER 

2 FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAY PROGRAM. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 1 of title 23, United 

4 States Code, is amended by inserting after section 154 the 

5 following: 

6 ‘‘§ 155. Treatment of State and local taxes 

7 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall not approve 

8 any project under section 106 in a State for a fiscal year 

9 if the Secretary determines that in the previous fiscal year 

10 State or local sales taxes were collected within the State 

11 on covered purchases of construction materials made, in 

12 whole or in part, with funds made available under this 

13 chapter. 

14 ‘‘(b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the following 

15 definitions apply: 

16 ‘‘(1) COVERED PURCHASE.—The term ‘covered 

17 purchase’— 

18 ‘‘(A) means a purchase of construction ma19 terials that are used and consumed during the 

20 construction of a project or incorporated into 

21 the constructed, reconstructed, or improved 

22 product or facility; but 

23 ‘‘(B) does not include a purchase of equip24 ment, heavy equipment, mechanized vehicles, 

25 and construction materials that are not fully 

26 consumed during the construction of a project. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1724 IH

1 ‘‘(c) CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL.—The term ‘con2 struction material’ means any substance specified or nec3 essary to satisfactorily complete the contract work for a 

4 project.’’. 

5 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The analysis for such 

6 chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating 

7 to section 154 the following: 

‘‘155. Treatment of State and local taxes.’’. 

8 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) shall apply to fiscal year 2017 and each 

10 fiscal year thereafter. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
SCWC-30734 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I
STATE OF HAWAI # I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs. DANIEL KAHANAOI, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(ICA NO. 30734; CR. NO. 09-1-0659) ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant’s application for writ of certiorari filed on January 15, 2013, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, February 26, 2013. Walter R. Schoettle for petitioner /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-30734 26-FEB-2013 12:08 PM
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Curtis Shivers, Appellant.

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Rothwax, J.), rendered on August 2, 1982, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sandler, Carro, Asch and Milonas, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Paul W., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[945 NYS2d 684]

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Nancy M. Bannon at suppression hearing, speedy trial motion and fact-finding determination; Monica Drinane, J., at disposition), entered on or about April 20, 2011, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts, which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (two counts), possession of pistol or revolver ammunition, and unlawful possession of a weapon by a person under 16 (two counts), and placed him with the Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 18 months, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the petition dismissed, without costs.

*427Appellant’s suppression motion was properly denied. The evidence showed that the officers, who were on patrol in a high crime area in the early morning hours, received a transmission of two black males with a gun. Upon arriving at the location provided, the officers saw appellant running at full speed and holding his waistband. The officers broadcast a detailed description of appellant and when two other officers, who had heard the transmissions, responded to the location, they saw appellant and another black man crossing the street. Appellant, who sufficiently matched the description, appeared nervous when he noticed the officers, and a bulge was observed in the jacket of appellant’s companion. Under these circumstances, there was a reasonable suspicion justifying the stop and frisk of appellant, which recovered a gun, as the officers had a legitimate concern for their safety *(People v Batista,*88 NY2d 650, 653-654 [1996]; *People v Rivera,*14 NY2d 441, 446 [1964], *cert denied*379 US 978 [1965]).

The petition, however, is dismissed because appellant’s right to a speedy disposition pursuant to Family Court Act § 340.1 was violated *(see e.g. Matter of Frank C.,*70 NY2d 408 [1987]). “Successive motions to adjourn a fact-finding hearing shall not be granted in the absence of a showing ... of special circumstances; such circumstances shall not include calendar congestion” (Family Ct Act § 340.1 [6]). Furthermore, the suppression hearing was not conducted on an expedited basis, as required because appellant was detained *(see*Family Ct Act § 332.2 [4]).

Furthermore, the preclusion motion filed by appellant’s counsel pertained only to the third officer’s testimony at the fact-finding hearing, and thus, did not provide grounds for delaying the suppression hearing *(see*Family Ct Act § 330.2 [8]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, DeGrasse, Freedman and Richter, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


        Subsidiaries of Atria Communities, Inc., a Delaware corporation
        ---------------------------------------------------------------


Hillhaven Properties, Ltd., an Oregon corporation
Atria Health Centers, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Atrium at Buckhead, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company
Atria St. Matthews, LLC, a Kentucky limited liability company
Atria Stoneybrook, LLC, a Kentucky limited liability company
Atria Springdale, LLC, a Kentucky limited liability company
Atrium at Weston Court, LLC, a Tennessee limited liability company
Atrium at Weston Place, LLC, a Tennessee limited liability company
Elder Healthcare Developers, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company
Atria Cordova, LP, a Tennessee limited partnership
Atria Riverdale, LP, a Tennessee limited partnership
Woodhaven Partnership Ltd., a Florida limited partnership
Cornerstone Care, L.L.C., a Kentucky limited liability company
Atria Highland Crossing, LLC, a Kentucky limited liability company
#### In the Matter of Richard A. Otto, Deceased. Regan Otto Schroeder, et al., Respondents, v Maria Otto, Appellant.

[944 NYS2d 883]

Order, Surrogate’s Court, New York County (Nora S. Anderson, S.), entered on or about August 30, 2011, which granted co-executors Regan Otto Schroeder and Jed Isaacs’s motion for a protective order to prevent objectant Maria Otto from obtaining any discovery related to RB Holdings Corp., except to the extent of records necessary to substantiate certain professional fees, and granted Otto’s motion to compel to the same extent, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Otto is bound by the settlement agreement she signed that resolved the issue of the payments she now attempts to contest *(see Butterfield v Cowing,*112 NY 486, 492 [1889]). Moreover, none of the documents about which she now raises issues are new to her, and all the issues could have been raised by one of her many previous counsel *(see Matter of Souza,*80 AD3d 446 [2011]).

We have considered Otto’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, DeGrasse, Freedman and Richter, JJ.
Technical Work Group

Phoenix, Arizona

May 30, 2001

List of Attendees

Presiding: Rick Johnson, Chairperson

Committee Members Present:

Clifford Barrett, UAMPS

Robert Begay, Navajo Nation

Perri Benemelis, ADWR

Kerry Christensen, Hualapai Tribe

Dave Cohen, Trout Unlimited

Wayne Cook, UCRC

Kurt Dongoske, The Hopi Tribe

Brenda Drye, So. Paiute Consortium

Norm Henderson, GLCA

Amy Heuslein, BIA

Pamela Hyde, Southwest Rivers

Matt Kaplinski, CGRG

Robert King, UDWR

Phillip S. Lehr, Colo. River Comm./NV

Don Metz, USFWS

S. Clayton Palmer, WAPA

Bill Persons, AGFD

Randall Peterson, USBR

Nikolai Ramsey, GCT

Robert Winfree, GRCA

Committee Members Absent:

Jonathan Damp, Pueblo of Zuni

William Davis, CREDA

Christopher Harris, CRBC

Nancy Hornewer, USGS

John Shields, WY State Engineers Office

D. Randolph Seaholm, CWCB

Alternates Present For:

Leslie James

Wayne Cook

William Davis, WAPA

John Shields, WY State Engineers Office

Other Interested Persons:

Jan Balsom, GCNP

Mary Barger, WAPA

Paul Barrett, USFWS

Gary Burton, WAPA

Nancy Coulam, USBR

Jeffrey Cross, NPS

Joe Falbo, Robert Lynch Law Firm

Barry Gold, USGS/GCMRC

Suzette Homer, Pueblo of Zuni

Susan Hueftle, USGS/GCMRC

Dennis Kubly, USBR

Ruth Lambert, USGS/GCMRC

Lisa Leap, GCNP

Mike Liszewski, USGS/GCMRC

Ted Melis, USGS/GCMRC

Mary Orton, The Mary Orton Company

Barbara Ralston, USGS/GCMRC

Ted Rampton, UAMPS

Tom Ryan, USBR
Technical Work Group

Phoenix, Arizona

May 31, 2001

List of Attendees

Presiding: Rick Johnson, Chairperson

Committee Members Present:

Clifford Barrett, UAMPS

Robert Begay, Navajo Nation

Kerry Christensen, Hualapai Tribe

Dave Cohen, Trout Unlimited

Wayne Cook, UCRC

Kurt Dongoske, The Hopi Tribe

Brenda Drye, So. Paiute Consortium

Amy Heuslein, BIA

Pamela Hyde, Southwest Rivers

Matt Kaplinski, CGRG

Robert King, UDWR

S. Clayton Palmer, WAPA

Bill Persons, AGFD

Randall Peterson, USBR

Nikolai Ramsey, GCT

Robert Winfree, GRCA

Committee Members Absent:

Robert Begay, Navajo Nation

Perri Benemelis, ADWR

Jonathan Damp, Pueblo of Zuni

William Davis, CREDA

Christopher Harris, CRBC

Norm Henderson, GLCA

Nancy Hornewer, USGS

Phillip Lehr, Colo. River Comm./NV

Don Metz, USFWS

D. Randolph Seaholm, CWCB

John Shields, WY State Engineers Office

Alternates Present For:

Leslie James

Wayne Cook

Paul Barrett

William Davis, WAPA

John Shields, WY State Engineers Office

Don Metz, USFWS

Other Interested Persons:

Jan Balsom, GCNP

Mary Barger, WAPA

Gary Burton, WAPA

Nancy Coulam, USBR

Jeffrey Cross, NPS

Joe Falbo, Robert Lynch Law Firm

Barry Gold, USGS/GCMRC

Suzette Homer, Pueblo of Zuni

Dennis Kubly, USBR

Ruth Lambert, USGS/GCMRC

Lisa Leap, GRNP

Mike Liszewski, USGS/GCMRC

Mary Orton, The Mary Orton Company

Barbara Ralston, USGS/GCMRC

Ted Rampton, UAMPS

Tom Ryan, USBR
FIRST AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                            AGREEMENT OF PARTNERSHIP
                     PW/GEODYNE PRODUCTION PARTNERSHIP II-C

       The Agreement of Partnership of PW/Geodyne  Production  Partnership  II-C
dated January 13, 1989 (the "Agreement") is hereby amended as follows:

       A.  The first  sentence of Section 2.1 is hereby  deleted and  replaced
by the following provision:

       "The  Production  Partnership  shall be conducted  under the name Geodyne
Production Partnership II-C."

       B.  All   references  in  the  Agreement  to   "PW/Geodyne   Production
Partnership II-C" are hereby changed to "Geodyne Production Partnership II-C."

       C.  The third  sentence of Section 2.1 is hereby  deleted and  replaced
by the following provision:

       "The office and principal place of business of the Production Partnership
shall be c/o  Geodyne  Production  Company,  Two West  Second,  Tulsa,  Oklahoma
74103."

       D.  The  name of the  "General  Partner"  and the  "Limited  Partnership"
reflected  in Article  One has been  changed  from  "PaineWebber/Geodyne  Energy
Income Limited  Partnership II-C" to "Geodyne Energy Income Limited  Partnership
II-C". All references in the Agreement to the name of the "General  Partner" and
the "Limited  Partnership" are hereby changed to reflect this name change.  This
change reflects a name change only and not a change of entity.

       In all other respects the Agreement is hereby ratified and affirmed.

 DATED:    February 26, 1993
                                         Managing Partner:

                                         Geodyne Production Company

                                         /s/ Michael E. Luttrell
                                         ----------------------------------
                                         Michael E. Luttrell
                                         Executive Vice President

                                         General Partner:

                                         Geodyne Energy Income Limited
                                         Partnership II-C

                                         By:  Geodyne Properties, Inc.,
                                              General Partner


                                         By: /s/Michael E. Luttrell
                                            ------------------------------
                                              Michael E. Luttrell,
                                              Executive Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                        233,024
<SECURITIES>                                  125,180
<RECEIVABLES>                                 232,752
<ALLOWANCES>                                    4,788
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              608,573
<PP&E>                                        153,335
<DEPRECIATION>                                 61,170
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                972,907
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         255,910
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                        18
<COMMON>                                           80
<OTHER-SE>                                    342,778
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  972,907
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              738,880
<CGS>                                               0         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 841,021
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               13,095
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              9,314
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (81,644)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   23,459
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (105,103)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (1,025)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                 (106,128)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.36)
        


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 19, 2018

a1212

Order 

Clerk

December 19, 2018

157431

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 157431

COA: 334256

Wayne CC: 16-002807-FC

TRAMANUEL DURHAM,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 25, 2018 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the 

case of People v Ames (Docket No. 156077) is pending on appeal before this Court and 

that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for 

leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the 

decision in that case.