alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Caraustar Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as
submitted for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas V. Brown, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                                                       
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 12, 2004 |  |  |  |                                                       
|                     |  | 
|                     |  |  |  | /s/ Thomas V. Brown                                   
|                     |  |  |  | Thomas V. Brown, President and Chief Executive Officer
April 1, 2024

Bureau of Reclamation

Attn: LTEMP SEIS Project Manager

125 South State Street, Suite 800

Salt Lake City, UT 84138

Via email only: LTEMPSEIS@usbr.gov

Re: GLEN CANYON DAM LONG-TERM EXPERIMENTAL AND MANAGEMENT PLAN

(LTEMP) DRAFT SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (DSEIS) – 89 FR

28, February 9, 2024

The City of St. George Energy Services Department (SGESD) appreciates the opportunity to

provide comments on the DSEIS issued on February 9, 2024. SGESD, a municipal utility since

1942, serves approximately 35,000 meters. Our customer base includes residential and

commercial customers. SGESD has received power from the Colorado River Storage Project

(CRSP) since 1966. The power rates assessed for energy from CRSP include the cost of

funding environmental projects and experiments including a longstanding participation in the

Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program.

Through our membership in the Colorado River Energy Distributors Association (CREDA), St.

George has participated in all NEPA processes associated with LTEMP and DSEIS. It is our

position that the DSEIS is legally inadequate to allow the decision maker and the public to

understand what is proposed or to make a reasoned choice among alternatives. The DSEIS

should be revised to include ALL necessary information and analyses and reissued for public

comment prior to issuance of a final SEIS, Record of Decision, or Implementation of any

experiments.

The fundamental premise behind the proposed action is based on the smallmouth bass data

and models. Although data has been collected it has not been analyzed. The DSEIS states

“(s)pecific data on these fish have been collected but are not available or citable at this time”

(p.3 -68). Based on the relationship and hypotheses related to smallmouth bass, humpback

chub and temperature, it is important that the tools used to analyze impacts and make decisions

be linked with the results disclosed in the DSEIS. It is critical that a technical review of the

preliminary model and the assumptions is done prior to issuance of the final SEIS.

SGESD appreciates the opportunity to provide comments and also urges Reclamation to update

and reissue a public draft SEIS. Given the potential direct and immediate impact of actions
being considered in the DSEIS to CRSP electric service customers, SGESD supports CREDA’s

recommendation that all LTEMP Cooperating Agencies be afforded the opportunity to participate

in any decision-making/recommendation process associated with actions under this DSEI.

SGESD supports the comments from both CREDA and UAMPS.

Sincerely,

Michele Randall, Mayor
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 00-2372

___________

Edward Maurice Cooper, also known *

as Hamid Abdul Wadud, *

*

Petitioner-Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

Gothriel J. LaFleur, Commissioner *

of Corrections, MN, * (UNPUBLISHED)

*

Respondent-Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: February 14, 2001

Filed: April 4, 2001

___________

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, LAY, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Edward Cooper was convicted of kidnaping and sexually assaulting a twelveyear-old girl. Cooper has been deaf since childhood. His primary language is

American Sign Language (ASL), although he has a rudimentary knowledge of English.

Cooper alleges that his attorney, David Redburn, provided ineffective assistance of

counsel for two reasons. First, Redburn, who had no experience with deaf individuals,
-2-

only had an ASL interpreter present for three pre-trial meetings. These meetings

constituted approximately one-third of the total pre-trial meetings. Second, Cooper

argues that Redburn had a conflict of interest because the Government’s first witness--

the victim’s mother--was represented in a divorce by one of Redburn’s legal partners.

Cooper’s petition for post-conviction relief was denied by the Minnesota courts.

See Cooper v. State, 565 N.W.2d 27 (Minn. Ct. App. 1997). Cooper then sought a

writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a) in federal district court, the Honorable

John R. Tunheim, presiding. The federal district court denied relief based in part on

the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation. We affirm the dismissal of the

petitioner’s habeas claim based upon the well-reasoned opinion of the district court.

See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
USDC Oregon Case 3:16-CR-00051-BR

Motion to Withdraw and Allow Self-representation 1

Tiffany A. Harris OSB 02318

Attorney at Law

811 SW Naito Pkwy, Suite 500

Portland, Oregon 97204

t. 971.634.1818 f. 503.721.9050

tiff@harrisdefense.com

Attorney for Shawna Cox

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

PORTLAND DIVISION

 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

 

 SHAWNA COX.

Defendant.

3:16-CR-00051-BR-07

MOTION TO WITHDRAW 

AND ALLOW SELFREPRESENTATION

 

Defense counsel, Tiffany A. Harris, hereby moves to withdraw as counsel of record, at 

the request of Defendant, Shawna Cox, to allow Ms. Cox to represent herself, in accordance 

wither her rights under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, as recognized in 

Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975). Ms. Cox asks that, if the pending motion is granted, 

current defense counsel be appointed in a standby capacity.

This motion is supported by the accompanying declaration of counsel.

DATED this 12th day of July, 2016.

Respectfully submitted,

/S/ Tiffany Harris

Tiffany A. Harris 

Attorney for Defendant Shawna Cox

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 870 Filed 07/12/16 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS THE SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND IN THE COMPANY'S
1996 ANNUAL REPORTS AAND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,148
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   79,032
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     30,301
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               138,281
<PP&E>                                         125,061
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,523
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 419,264
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           87,977
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            88
<OTHER-SE>                                     101,620
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   419,264
<SALES>                                        449,111
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               449,111
<CGS>                                          375,086
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  375,086
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                36,415
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,298
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 28,312
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,670
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,642
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,642
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.88
        

</TABLE>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Vegetable Crops Research: Madison, WI
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    ScientistsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Madison, Wisconsin Vegetable Crops Research Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Collaborations The Vegetable Crops Research has a long and productive history of collaborative research involving stakeholders.  Current collaborators and projects:


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Renewable Product Technology Research: Peoria, IL
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    NCAUR homepageSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Peoria, Illinois National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research Renewable Product Technology Research Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Collaborations The Renewable Product Technology Research has a long and productive history of collaborative research involving stakeholders.  Current collaborators and projects:


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-7535

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KENNETH LAMONT REAMS, a/k/a HOT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at 

Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. (1:14-cr-00426-CCE-1; 1:16-cv00510-CCE-LPA)

Submitted: January 18, 2018 Decided: January 23, 2018

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Lamont Reams, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Francis Joseph, Angela Hewlett 

Miller, Kyle David Pousson, Assistant United States Attorneys, OFFICE OF THE 

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Lamont Reams seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 

(2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the 

merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 

336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner 

must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the 

motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 

484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Reams has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Digital Lightwave, Inc.
(the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Robert F. Hussey, Interim Chief Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



|       |  |                |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                               
|------ |  | -------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|       |  |                |  | 
|Dated: |  | March 30, 2005 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ ROBERT F. HUSSEY                                                          
|       |  |                |  |  |  |     |  | Robert F. Hussey Interim Chief Accounting
Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
Technical Work Group Meeting

Final Agenda March 10, 2011

Glen Canyon Dam

Adaptive Management Program

Technical Work Group

Arizona Department of Water Resources

3550 N. Central Avenue

Phoenix, Arizona

Verde Conference Room

Tuesday

March 8, 2011

Time TOPIC PERSON TAB

8:25 a.m.

Welcome and Administrative

1. Introductions and Determination of Quorum (16)

2. Approval of November 15-16, 2010 Meeting Minutes

3. Approval of January 20, 2011, Meeting Minutes

4. Review of Action Items 

5. Old Business

 Ad hoc group updates

 Report/Assignments from AMWG Meeting

 GCRMC update: workshops in 2011

6. New Business

Shane Capron

GCRMC

Agenda

Meeting 

Minutes

Action 

Items

9 a.m.

BOR Updates

 Nonnative Fish Control EA

 HFE EA

 LTEMP EIS

Glen Knowles Updates

10:00 B R E A K

10:10 GCMRC Update on Workshops 2011 (cont.) Ted Melis

11 a.m.

Socioeconomics Implementation Plan – Update

 Economic Assessment

 Table 3 and Information Needs

 NPS socioeconomics project

Bruce Peacock

Helen Fairley

Shane Capron

Socioeconomics

11:43 a.m.

Hydrograph development for WY 2012

 Consider proposals

 Determine analyses needed

 Next steps

Shane Capron

Glen Knowles

Dave Trueman Hydrograph

12:45 p.m. L U N C H

1:55 pm Genetics Management Plan Wade Wilson, USFWS Science

2:43 p.m. Goal 3 – Extirpated Species Ad Hoc Group Report Larry Stevens Science

FY 2012 Budget and Workplan Modifications

GCMRC

Shane Capron

Glen Knowles

Budget

3:00 p.m.

(:10) BREAK

5 p.m. FY 2012 Budget and Workplan Modifications (cont’d) Budget

5:02 p.m.

(:05)

Public Comment, Wrap-up and Adjourn Shane Capron
Technical Work Group Meeting

D R A F T Agenda March 10, 2011

Glen Canyon Dam

Adaptive Management Program

Technical Work Group

Arizona Department of Water Resources

3550 N. Central Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona

Verde Conference Room

Wednesday

March 9, 2011

Time TOPIC PERSON TAB

8:25 a.m. Welcome and Administrative

1. Introductions and Determination of Quorum (16) Shane Capron Agenda

8:30 a.m. SA annual report and Decision Support Dave Garrett

Science

Advisors

9:05 a.m.

General Core Monitoring Plan – Workshop Approach

(Facilitation provided by Mary Orton)

 Discussion of Structured Decision Making approaches 

(decision support)

 Objectives and Overview of Appendix B

 Development of Evaluation Criteria using Consensus 

Workshop Method

Shane Capron

Mary Orton Core 

Monitoring

9:40- 9:50 B R E A K

9:50 General Core Monitoring Plan – Workshop Approach (cont) Mary Orton

Shane Capron

12:15 –

1:15 L U N C H

1:00 p.m.

(1:55) General Core Monitoring Plan – Workshop Approach cont’d Core

Monitoring

2:55 p.m.

(:05)

Public Comment, Wrap-up and Adjourn Shane Capron
S. 2129

One Hundred Fifth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-eight

An Act

To eliminate restrictions on the acquisition of certain land contiguous to Hawaii

Volcanoes National Park.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hawaii Volcanoes National Park

Adjustment Act of 1998’’.

SEC. 2. HAWAII VOLCANOES NATIONAL PARK.

The first section of the Act of June 20, 1938 (52 Stat. 781,

chapter 530; 16 U.S.C. 391b), is amended by inserting before the

period at the end the following: ‘‘, except for the land depicted

on the map entitled ‘NPS–PAC 1997HW’, which may be purchased

with donated or appropriated funds’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.