alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Robert R. Ward

It appearing that the defendant in the above-entitled case has failed to prosecute his appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County with proper *663diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed unless the defendant files his brief on or before June 17, 1975.

*Walter D. Flanagan,*assistant state’s attorney, for the plaintiff (appellee).

*Donald F. Zezima,*for the defendant (appellant).

Argued May 6

decided May 6, 1975
#### WHITTEN v. THE STATE.

(Decided June 5, 1913.)

Appeal from St. Clair Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. J. E. Blackwood.

No counsel marked for appellant.

R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, for the State.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed.
#### BPIII-548 West 164th Street LLC, Respondent, v Jose Garcia, Appellant.

[943 NYS2d 483]—

Order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, entered September 2, 2010, which reversed an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Marcia J. Sikowitz, J.), entered December 30, *4292008, granting respondent’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the proceeding, and denied the motion, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted.

Petitioner brought this nonpayment proceeding in 2007, after buying the building in which respondent is a tenant, and having no knowledge of the arrangement between respondent and the previous owner. The tenant resided in apartment 6C since moving into the building in 1958. At the time of tenant’s application for the senior citizen rent increase exemption program in 2001, the legal rent for apartment 6C was $388.29. Tenant’s share of that rent was set at $358. The record reflects that the lease executed on March 11, 2003 between respondent and the previous owner contains a handwritten notation that respondent’s share of the stated legal monthly rent of $603.92 is $358. The uncontroverted evidence, including the course of conduct of the parties to the lease, demonstrates that the intent of those parties was to cap the rent at tenant’s previous legal rent share of $358 for the duration of respondent’s tenancy *(see Waverly Corp. v City of New York,*48 AD3d 261, 265 [2008]). The handwritten provision was added to the lease after respondent moved temporarily from apartment 6C to apartment 6D to permit renovations to be performed in apartment 6C. Rather than moving the tenant back to apartment 6C, the owner informed tenant that he could stay in apartment 6D for the same $358. Thereafter, while the stated legal rent increased at the beginning of every new lease term, respondent continued to pay, and the owner continued to accept, $358 per month as if the tenant were still residing in apartment 6C. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, Catterson, Renwick and Richter, JJ. [Prior Case History: 28 Misc 3d 140(A), 2010 NY Slip Op 51547(U).]
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 192 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 192

To make it a violation of a right secured by the Constitution and laws 
of the United States to perform an abortion with the knowledge that the 
 abortion is being performed solely because of the gender of the fetus.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 22, 1997

   Mr. Helms introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To make it a violation of a right secured by the Constitution and laws 
of the United States to perform an abortion with the knowledge that the 
 abortion is being performed solely because of the gender of the fetus.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Civil Rights of Infants Act''.

SEC. 2. DEPRIVING PERSONS OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION OF LAWS BEFORE BIRTH.

    Section 1979 of the Revised Statutes (42 U.S.C. 1983) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(a)'' before ``Every person''; and
            (2) by adding at the end thereof the following:
    ``(b) For purposes of subsection (a), and for purposes of other 
provisions of law, it shall be a deprivation of a `right' secured by 
the laws of the United States for an individual to perform an abortion 
with the knowledge that the pregnant woman is seeking the abortion 
solely because of the gender of the fetus. No pregnant woman who seeks 
to obtain an abortion solely on the basis of the gender of the fetus 
shall be liable in any manner under this section.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 21

 

ITRONICS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES

 

                                                 STATE OF            NAMES UNDERWHICH

   NAME                                       INCORPORATION            THEYDO BUSINESS

Whitney & Whitney, Inc.                          Nevada                    Same

Itronics Metallurgical, Inc                      Nevada                    Same

Itronics California, Inc.                        California                Same

Nevada Hydrometallurgical Project

(A Partnership)                                  Nevada                    Same

American Hydromet 

(A Joint Venture)                                Nevada                    Same

 

79

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>          5
<LEGEND>           UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT 12/31/97
</LEGEND>
<CIK>              0001016275
<NAME>             GEO PETROLEUM, INC.
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-12-1997
<CASH>                                    418,393
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                             123,013
<ALLOWANCES>                              341,263
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          882,669
<PP&E>                                    6,498,324
<DEPRECIATION>                            (1,201,602)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            6,179,391
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     1,649,176
<BONDS>                                   0
<COMMON>                                  7,049,399
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                (2,519,184)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              6,179,391
<SALES>                                   1,100,549
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          1,299,759
<CGS>                                     696,648
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             1,923,374
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        144,791
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (768,406)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           (3,744)
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                              (772,150)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (0.10)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 176 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 176

  To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 to permit the 
collection of user fees by non-Federal entities in connection with the 
challenge cost-sharing program for management of recreation facilities, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 2015

  Mr. Womack introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 to permit the 
collection of user fees by non-Federal entities in connection with the 
challenge cost-sharing program for management of recreation facilities, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Local Organization Cooperative 
Agreement for Land and Facility Maintenance Act of 2015'' or the 
``LOCAL Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. CHALLENGE COST-SHARING PROGRAM FOR MANAGEMENT OF RECREATION 
              FACILITIES.

    Section 225 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 
U.S.C. 2328) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following:
    ``(c) User Fees.--
            ``(1) Collection of fees.--The Secretary may permit a non-
        Federal public or private entity that has entered into an 
        agreement pursuant to subsection (b) to collect user fees for 
        the use of developed recreation sites and facilities, whether 
        developed or constructed by such entity or the Department of 
        the Army.
            ``(2) Use of fees.--A non-Federal public or private entity 
        collecting user fees pursuant to paragraph (1) may--
                    ``(A) retain up to 100 percent of the fees 
                collected, as determined by the Secretary; and
                    ``(B) use that amount, as approved by the 
                Secretary, for operation, maintenance, and management 
                at the recreation site where collected, notwithstanding 
                section 210(b)(4) of the Flood Control Act of 1968 (16 
                U.S.C. 460d-3(b)(4)).
            ``(3) Terms and conditions.--The authority of a non-Federal 
        public or private entity under this subsection shall be subject 
        to such terms and conditions as the Secretary determines 
        necessary to protect the interests of the United States.''.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 30, 2013

t0923 

# Order

Clerk September 30, 2013

147340

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIG AN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147340

COA: 310503

Saginaw CC: 11

- 036235

- FH

DEON DERRELL LINDSEY,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 14, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.3
Meredith Corporation 
1716 Locust Street
Des Moines, IA 50309 
T 515-284-3000


John Zieser


Subject: Amendment to Employment Agreement 


Dear John,


Our records indicate you are party to an Employment Agreement (“Agreement”) with Meredith Corporation (“Meredith”). Upon your acceptance below, this letter shall serve as an Amendment to the Agreement.


Due to the unprecedented and negative effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, Meredith is implementing a reduction in pay program. The program reduces employee base salary by a set percentage within certain tiers. Accordingly, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in your Employment Agreement, you hereby acknowledge and agree that:


(i)    beginning May 4, 2020 (“Effective Date”), through September 4, 2020, your annual Base Salary (as defined in the Agreement) shall be reduced to $542,500 (before withholdings and deductions), (herein, “new Base Salary”), and will continue to be paid on a bi-weekly basis with the new Base Salary first reflected in your May 15, 2020 paycheck; and


(ii)    to the extent your new Base Salary is used to calculate any benefits paid through short term disability or any 401k benefits under the applicable Meredith plan, your new Base Salary as of the Effective Date may impact any such benefits to which you may be entitled under the terms of the applicable plan, but shall not otherwise modify or impact the benefits or payments to which you are entitled under any other benefit or compensation plan or agreement or the calculation of benefits or payments thereunder.


You further agree that this reduction in Base Salary, even if it reduces your Base Salary below any stated minimum in your Agreement, shall not constitute a breach of the Agreement and shall not allow you to resign your employment and receive separation pay under the Agreement or any severance plan.


This Amendment and the Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Iowa without reference to the principles of conflict of laws. Except with respect to the changes expressly noted herein, the Agreement otherwise remains in full force and effect.


We do understand this is going to be tough for all of us, but we need everyone to continue to pull together so that we can emerge from this challenge even stronger. If you have questions, please contact your local HR representative.


Please electronically sign this letter by May 13, 2020.




MEREDITH CORPORATION


/s/ Dina Nathanson
SVP, Human Resources


I agree to the above Amendment and I understand that, except as amended above, the terms and conditions of my employment will continue to be governed by the aforesaid Agreement.






Signature: /s/ John Zieser                Date of Signature: 5/14/2020


- 1 -
Glen Canyon Dam Technical Work Group Meeting

March 30-31, 2004

List of Attachments

No Attachment Author / Presenter

1 Attendance Sheets

2 Motions from AMWG Meeting (March 3-4, 2004) Norm Henderson

3a

3b

3c

Timeline of TWG Assignments

Revised Timeline of TWG Assignments

Projects recommended by GCMRC for deferral from 

FY04 to FY05

Norm Henderson

Jeff Lovich

4a

4b

Glen Canyon Dam and PowerPlant PPT Presentation

Questions/Answers from TWG/Ken

Ken Rice

5a

5b

Outline of the GCMRC Strategic Plan

One-page GCMRC Strategic Plan Outline

Jeff Lovich

6 BAHG March 17-18, 2004, Meeting Notes Dennis Kubly

7a

7b

Hualapai Native Fish Rearing Facility PPT

Questions/Answers from TWG/Kerry

Kerry Christensen

8a

8b

Riparian Restoration on the Colorado River

Tamarisk Removal in the Grand Canyon

Fred Phillips

Larry Stevens

9a

9b

Native Fish Habitat Restoration In Selected Tributaries 

of the Grand Canyon

Questions/Answers from TWG/Bill

Bill Leibfried

10a

10b

10c

TWG Operating Procedures

Operational Issues to be Discussed

Letters from Environmental Groups presented to 

AMWG at March 3-4, 2004 meeting

Norm Henderson
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with this quarterly report of Sino-American Development Corporation
      ("the Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I,
      Fang Zhong, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.








/s/
      Fang
      Zhong


_______________________


Fang
      Zhong


Principal
      Executive Officer and


Principal
      Financial Officer





Dated:
      September 27, 2007
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1805

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to increase the Federal

minimum wage.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 19, 1998

Mr. KENNEDY (for himself, Mr. DODD, Mr. DASCHLE, Mr. INOUYE, Mr.

BUMPERS, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. MOYNIHAN, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. LEVIN, Mr.

LAUTENBERG, Mr. HARKIN, Mr. KERRY, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. WELLSTONE, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Ms. MOSELEY-BRAUN, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. REED, and Mr.

TORRICELLI) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

A BILL

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to increase

the Federal minimum wage.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fair Minimum Wage

5 Act of 1998’’.
2

•S 1805 IS

1 SEC. 2. MINIMUM WAGE INCREASE.

2 (a) WAGE.—Paragraph (1) of section 6(a) of the Fair

3 Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 206(a)(1)) is

4 amended to read as follows:

5 ‘‘(1) except as otherwise provided in this sec6 tion, not less than—

7 ‘‘(A) $5.65 an hour during the year begin8 ning on January 1, 1999; and

9 ‘‘(B) $6.15 an hour during the year begin10 ning on January 1, 2000.’’.

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

12 subsection (a) takes effect on January 1, 1999.

Æ
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

AMMON BUNDY, JON RITZHEIMER, 

JOSEPH O'SHAUGHNESSY, RYAN 

PAYNE, RYAN BUNDY, BRIAN 

CAVALIER, SHAWNA COX, PETER 

SANTILLI, JASON PATRICK, 

DUANE LEO EHMER, DYLAN 

ANDERSON, SEAN ANDERSON, 

DAVID LEE FRY, JEFF WAYNE 

BANTA, SANDRA LYNN ANDERSON, 

KENNETH MEDENBACH, BLAINE 

COOPER, WESLEY KJAR, COREY 

LEQUIEU, NEIL WAMPLER, JASON 

CHARLES BLOMGREN, DARRYL 

WILLIAM THORN, GEOFFREY 

STANEK, TRAVIS COX, ERIC LEE 

FLORES, and JAKE RYAN, 

Defendants. 

BROWN, Judge. 

3:16-cr-00051-BR 

ORDER 

Based on the stipulation of Defendants Jason Patrick, Ryan 

Bundy, and Kenneth Medenbach, and the Court finding good cause, 

1 - ORDER 

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 585 Filed 05/19/16 Page 1 of 2
the Court ORDERS all standby counsel appointed by the Court in 

this matter and their agents to treat all communications between 

themselves and the pro se Defendants to whom they have been 

assigned as subject to the same rules of confidentiality owed to 

clients under Oregon Rule of Professional Conduct 1.6. The Court 

also ORDERS the Government to treat any such communications in 

the same fashion as privileged attorney-client communications. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

t'til-v 

DATED this ~h day of May, 2016, nunc pro tune to the dates 

the Court appointed the respective standby counsel. 

United States District Judge 

2 - ORDER 

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 585 Filed 05/19/16 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 169 (Friday, September 3, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 49533]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19127]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than September 20, 
2021.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Jeffrey Imgarten, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Keith A. Knudsen, Laurel, Nebraska; individually, and as voting 
trustee of the Employee Stock Ownership Plan Accounts Trust of the 
Security Bank KSOP & Trust, Laurel, Nebraska; to acquire voting shares 
of First Laurel Security Co., and thereby indirectly acquire voting 
shares of Security Bank, both of Laurel, Nebraska.
    2. William D. Young, Avon, Colorado; to join the Young Family 
Control Group, a group acting in concert, to acquire voting shares of 
C.S.B. Co., and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Homestead 
Bank, both of Cozad, Nebraska.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 31, 
2021.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2021-19127 Filed 9-2-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
# L_2009201EN.01006201.xml

| 1.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 201/62 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 201/62

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 27 July 2009

appointing one Hungarian member of the European Economic and Social Committee

(2009/583/EC, Euratom)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 259 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 167 thereof,

Having regard to Decision 2006/524/EC, Euratom (1),

Having regard to the proposal of the Hungarian Government,

Having regard to the opinion of the Commission,

Whereas a member’s seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the death of Mr István GARAI,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Mr József NAGY, Various Interest Group (GROUP III), is hereby appointed as a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 20 September 2010.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 27 July 2009.

For the Council

The President

C. BILDT

---

(1)  
  OJ L 207, 28.7.2006, p. 30.

1

---