alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Discussion about the High 

Flow Experimental Design

June 26, 2018
AMWG

• “Actions outside of the ROD could require additional NEPA 

compliance. Andrea requested time to consider what is allowed with 

the assistance of the DOI Solicitor’s Office.”1

• Discussion expected at future AMWG meetings.

1 AMWG meeting minutes, February 2018
Input Provided since April 

Meeting
The purpose of this table is organize and track the Technical Work Group's input on High Flow Experiment (HFE) designs or design elements.

This table is intended to be used as a discussion aide, helpful in answering an overarching research management question: How can HFE designs be optimized to 

achieve resource benefits?

Design or design element

Authorization 

Status1 Suggester(s) Research management question(s) Monitoring criteria and standards 

Conduct sediment-triggered HFE’s in June 

(i.e., the highest discharge month in the 

pre-dam record) Proposed Jim

Modify the sediment accounting window 

(including accounting for any unused 

sand) to trigger more Spring HFE’s in lieu 

of implementing Fall HFE's Proposed

Jim/Larry/Shan

e/Craig/Clayto

n

Are there ecological and functional 

benefits of combining the sediment 

accounting periods and HFE windows to 

allow for Spring HFEs using fall sediment 

inputs?

Net differences between Spring HFE's and 

Fall HFE's for: 1) beach area availability 

during the high-use boating season; 2) 

aeolian sand transport and cultural site 

preservation; 3) brown trout abundance 

in Lees Ferry; 4) foodbase availability to 

chub; 5) Lees Ferry rainbow trout 

abundance and emigration; 6) 

hydropower value; 7) other ecosystem 

components

Conduct sediment-triggered HFE’s below 

the maximum hydropower generating 

capacity Authorized Jim
Design or design element

Authorization 

Status1 Suggester(s) Research management question(s) Monitoring criteria and standards 

Time sediment-triggered HFE’s closer 

to Paria River peak flows

Authorized (Oct, 

Nov, Mar, Apr); 

proposed (other 

months)

Jim/Shane/Cr

aig/Clayton

Could a sediment-triggered HFE 

timed to occur soon after a Paria

River flood (i.e. a couple of days) be 

better at meeting sediment goals? 

Fine sediment and organic matter 

retention

Sandbar cohesion and relative 

erosion rates

Winter-time turbidity

Chub predation rates

Proactive Spring HFE's Authorized

Shane/Craig/

Clayton

Are proactive Spring HFEs in 

equalization years better or worse 

than doing nothing at all?

Net differences between 

equalization flow and equalization 

flow plus Proactive Spring HFE for: 1) 

sand deposited above the stage for 

power plant capacity; and 2) sand 

transported

Extended duration Fall HFE's Authorized

Shane/Craig/

Clayton

Is extending the duration of an HFE 

worth the additional sediment being 

transported?

The elapsed time for when sand 

transport exceed sand deposits 

1 Not intended to indicate if or when a design or design element may be implemented
EXHIBIT 31.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14 AND 15d-14
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, John Robinson, Chief Executive Officer of US Global Nanospace, Inc. (the
"Company"), certify that:

      I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of US Global
Nanospace, Inc.

      Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report.

      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in the report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
and for, the periods, presented in the report.

      The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

            (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which the periodic report is being
prepared;

            (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

            (c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Company's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting;
and

      The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Company's auditors and to the audit committee of the Company's board of
directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent function):

            (i) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and

      (ii) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting.

Dated:  February 25, 2005


/s/ John Robinson
------------------------
John Robinson
Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS AND BALANCE SHEET AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FORM 10-QSB FOR QUARTER ENDED 9/30/96.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          50,539
<SECURITIES>                                   354,865
<RECEIVABLES>                                  269,729
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,675,133
<PP&E>                                         120,457
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,317
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,992,762
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          719,035
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,940,173
<COMMON>                                     3,744,493
<OTHER-SE>                                  (4,762,036)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,992,762
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                70,704
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 608
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                563,979
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            563,979
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   563,979
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.028
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.028
        

</TABLE>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Immunity and Disease Prevention Research: Davis, CA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Laboratories
                        Stephensen Group
                                    Kable Group
                                    Lemay GroupSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Davis, California Western Human Nutrition Research Center Immunity and Disease Prevention Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Research Programs and Projects at this LocationARS research is organized into National Programs. Within each National Program are research projects. Listed below are  the National Programs and research projects currently conducted at this location.
Clicking on a National Program (NP) will take you  to the main ARS site for more information on the program. Clicking on a research  project title will take you to more information on the project.  Current View: All Projects   Show All Projects ||
         Appropriated Projects Only


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00591-CV

Mary Riemann and Teresa Ringbom, Appellants

v.

Norman John Weaner, II, and Dora Weaner, Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BLANCO COUNTY, 424TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. CV06856, HONORABLE J. ALLAN GARRETT, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellants Mary Riemann and Teresa Ringbom have filed a motion to dismiss this

appeal with each party to pay their own costs, and they certify that appellees do not oppose the

motion. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal with each party to pay their own costs. See

Tex. R. App. P. 42.1.

__________________________________________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Rose, and Goodwin

Dismissed on Appellants’ Motion

Filed: September 11, 2013
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Samuel Ramirez, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Maraño, J.), rendered July 13, 1984, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that he was denied a fair trial by the admission into evidence of testimony that a large sum of money was recovered from him at the time of his arrest for a single sale of narcotics is without merit. The defendant made no objection to the initial testimony by a police officer that money was recovered from the defendant; therefore, the issue has thus not been preserved for appellate review. In addition, it was the defendant, on cross-examination of that same officer, who elicited testimony as to the amount of money recovered ($325), and thus, if the defendant suffered prejudice, it was caused by his own actions *(cf. People v Lizzarra,*70 AD2d 572; *People v Jones,*62 AD2d 356). Thus, the court properly denied the defense request for a “limiting” instruction.

Finally, the trial court did not err in denying defense counsel’s request that the jury be permitted to view the scene of the crime *(see, People v Rao,*107 AD2d 720). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Rubin and Spatt, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                Exhibit 99(a)
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of The Dial Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Herbert
M. Baum, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Herbert M. Baum
----------------------
Herbert M. Baum
Chief Executive Officer
March 12, 2003
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

MORASCH MEATS, INC., 3:16-CV-00269-PK

an Oregon corporation, 

ORDER

Plaintiff, 

v. 

 

FREVOL HPP, LLC fka FRESHER 

EVOLUTION HPP, L.L.C., a 

Michigan limited liability 

company, dba NEXT HPP; 

ALL NATURAL FRESHNESS, L.L.C., 

a Michigan limited liability 

company; ALL NATURAL FRESHNESS, 

INC., a Michigan corporation; 

GERALD R. LUDWICK, an individual; 

and PAIGE M. RAIFSNIDER LUDWICK, 

an individual,

 Defendants.

BROWN, Judge.

Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued Findings and

Recommendation (#15) on May 5, 2016, in which he recommends this

1 - ORDER

Case 3:16-cv-00269-PK Document 26 Filed 06/15/16 Page 1 of 2
Court deny Defendants’ Motion (#12) to Dismiss and deny

Defendants’ Alternative Motion (#12) for a More Definite

Statement. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and

Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its

obligation to review the record de novo. See Dawson v. Marshall,

561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). See also United States v.

Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc). 

Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not

find any error. 

CONCLUSION 

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings and

Recommendation (#15). Accordingly, the Court DENIES Defendants’

Motion (#12) to Dismiss and DENIES Defendants’ Alternative Motion

(#12) for a More Definite Statement.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 15th day of June, 2016.

/s/ Anna J. Brown

 

ANNA J. BROWN

United States District Judge

2 - ORDER

Case 3:16-cv-00269-PK Document 26 Filed 06/15/16 Page 2 of 2
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1723 

AN ACT 

To direct the Securities and Exchange Commission to revise 

Form S–1 so as to permit smaller reporting companies 

to use forward incorporation by reference for such form. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1723 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Company Simple 

3 Registration Act of 2015’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FORWARD INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE FOR 

5 FORM S–1. 

6 Not later than 45 days after the date of the enact7 ment of this Act, the Securities and Exchange Commission 

8 shall revise Form S–1 so as to permit a smaller reporting 

9 company (as defined in section 230.405 of title 17, Code 

10 of Federal Regulations) to incorporate by reference in a 

11 registration statement filed on such form any documents 

12 that such company files with the Commission after the ef13 fective date of such registration statement. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 14, 2015. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1723 

AN ACT 

To direct the Securities and Exchange Commission 

by reference for such form. porting companies to use forward incorporation to revise Form S–1 so as to permit smaller re-
Exhibit 31.2 ENTRADA NETWORKS, INC. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13-A-14 OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1934 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  CERTIFICATION  I, Davinder Sethi, Ph. D., certify that:  1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Entrada Networks, Inc.;
 2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this quarterly report;
 4.  The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
  (a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
  Date:       September 11, 2003  /s/ Davinder Sethi Davinder Sethi, Ph. D. Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 169 (Friday, September 3, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 49531]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19063]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9058-2]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information 202-564-5632 or https://www.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)
Filed August 23, 2021 10 a.m. EST Through August 30, 2021 10 a.m. EST
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

    Notice: Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make 
public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's 
comment letters on EISs are available at: https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-public/action/eis/search.

EIS No. 20210128, Draft, NOAA, CT, Connecticut National Estuarine 
Research Reserve, Comment Period Ends: 10/18/2021, Contact: Erica 
Seiden 240-533-0781.
EIS No. 20210129, Draft, USPS, DC, Next Generation Delivery Vehicle 
Acquisitions, Comment Period Ends: 10/18/2021, Contact: Davon M. 
Collins 202-268-4570.
EIS No. 20210130, Draft, USACE, NY, Nassau County Back Bays Coastal 
Storm Risk Management Integrated Feasibility Report and Environmental 
Impact Statement, Comment Period Ends: 10/18/2021, Contact: Scott 
Sanderson 215-656-6571.
EIS No. 20210131, Final, USACE, LA, South Central Coast Louisiana Final 
Integrated Feasibility Study with Environmental Impact Statement, 
Review Period Ends: 10/04/2021, Contact: Joe Jordan 309-794-5791.
    Amended Notice:
EIS No. 20210095, Draft, FHWA, NY, Interstate 81 Viaduct Project, 
Comment Period Ends: 10/14/2021, Contact: Richard J. Marquis 518-431-
4127. Revision to FR Notice Published 07/16/2021; Extending the Comment 
Period from 09/14/2021 to 10/14/2021.
EIS No. 20210103, Draft, FTA, CA, West Santa Ana Branch Transit 
Corridor Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental 
Impact Report, Comment Period Ends: 09/28/2021, Contact: Rusty Whisman 
213-202-3956. Revision to FR Notice Published 07/30/2021; Extending the 
Comment Period from 09/13/2021 to 09/28/2021.

    Dated: August 30, 2021.
Cindy S. Barger,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2021-19063 Filed 9-2-21; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P