alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
C ite as 2017 Ark. App. 138



## ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION I

No. CR

- 16

- 795

ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES APPELLANT

V.

STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE O PINION D ELIVERED : M ARCH 8, 2017

APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT , ELEVENTH DIVISION [ NO. 60JV

- 16

- 414 ]

HONORABLE PATRICIA A. JAMES , JUDGE

AFFIRMED

ROBERT J. GLADWIN , Judge Appellant, the Division of Youth Services of the Arkansas Department of Human Services (hereinafter ADHS), appeals the June 28, 2016 order of commitment for J.G. and the June 30, 2016 order denying its motion to intervene and partially granting its motion to set aside the June 28, 2016 order filed by the Pulaski County Circuit Court. ADHS does not appeal the actual determination of delinquency with respect to J.G. in this matter, but rather, the limitations and requirements placed on ADHS by the order issue d by the Eleventh Division of the Sixth Judicial District. ADHS argues that this court should (1) reverse the denial of the motion to intervene filed by ADHS and (2) find that the limitations placed on ADHS as it relates to its placement of J.G. upon commitment by the trial court infringes on its statutory authority.Cite as 2017 Ark. App. 138

2 We affirm based on the analysis in a companion opinion decided today. See Ark. Dep’t of Human Servs. v. State , 2017 Ark. App. 140

. Affirmed.

A BRAMSON and V IRDEN , JJ., agree. Nader G. Afsordeh , Arkansas Department of Human Services, Office of Chief Counsel, for appellant. Leslie Rutledge , Att’y Gen., by: Adam Jackson , Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.
ACCEPTED 04-15-00409-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 7/23/2015 12:42:35 PM KEITH HOTTLE CLERK
No. 99-20910 -1-

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-20910 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus VINCENT JOSEPH SHELVIN, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-98-CR-120-1

-------------------- June 29, 2000 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Vincent Joseph Shelvin appeals his sentence for possession with intent to distribute crack cocaine. He argues that the district court had discretion to consider his collateral challenge under to a state conviction used to calculate his criminal history under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2 and United States v. Canales , 960 F.2d 1111, 1115 (5th Cir. 1992). Canales has been superseded by the 1993 amendments to the commentary of § 4A1.2 and by the Supreme Court’s ruling in Custis v. United States , 511 U.S. 485, 487 (1994). See United States v. Toliver , No. 94-40978No. 99-20910 -2-

** Unpublished opinions issued before January 1, 1996, have precedential value. 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.3. (5th Cir. Mar. 17, 1995). ** Under the new language of the commentary, Shelvin may collaterally attack his prior conviction only if that right is otherwise recognized in law. § 4A1.2, comment. (n.6). Shelvin has failed to provide any authority for a collateral attack on his sentence. Moreover, even if the district court did have discretion under Canales to consider the collateral attack, the court chose not to exercise its discretion in Shelvin’s case. The court refused to rule on the validity of a state conviction under state law until after the state courts had had an opportunity to address the issue. Shelvin cannot show an abuse of discretion in that decision. Shelvin’s sentence is AFFIRMED.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alkermes Clinical Partners,
L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Richard F. Pops, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Alkermes Development Corporation II, General Partner of the Partnership,
certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,18 U.S.C. § 1350
that:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Partnership.

| |  |                                                                                                                                                                       |  | 
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
| |  | /s/ Richard F. Pops                                                                                                                                                   |  | 
| |  |                                                                                                                                                                       |  | 
| |  | Richard F. Pops,
President and Chief Executive Officer of 
Alkermes Development Corporation II, 
General Partner of Alkermes Clinical 
Partners, L.P.
August 13, 2003 |  |
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 169 (Friday, September 3, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49520-49521]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19092]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XB378]


North Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of web conference.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The North Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) Partial 
Coverage Fishery Monitoring Advisory Committee (PCFMAC) will meet 
September 17, 2021.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Friday, September 17, 2021, from 
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Alaska Time.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be a web conference. Join online through 
the link at https://meetings.npfmc.org/Meeting/Details/2374.
    Council address: North Pacific Fishery Management Council, 1007 W 
3rd Ave., Anchorage, AK 99501-2252; telephone: (907) 271-2809. 
Instructions for attending the meeting are given under SUPPLEMENTARY 
INFORMATION, below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sara Cleaver, Council staff; phone: 
(907) 271-2809 and email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#71021003105f121d1410071403311f1e10105f161e07"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a8dbc9dac986cbc4cdc9decddae8c6c7c9c986cfc7de">[email protected]</span></a>. For technical support, 
please contact administrative Council staff, email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0866786e656b26696c6561664866676969266f677e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="eb859b8d8688c58a8f868285ab85848a8ac58c849d">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

[[Page 49521]]

Agenda

Friday, September 17, 2021

    The PCFMAC agenda will include: (a) Reviewing the draft 2022 Annual 
Deployment Plan and budget update; (b) status update on the partial 
coverage integrated analysis work plan; (c) an update on observer 
provider labor issues; (d) public comment; and (e) other business. The 
agenda is subject to change, and the latest version will be posted at 
https://meetings.npfmc.org/Meeting/Details/2374 prior to the meeting, 
along with meeting materials.

Connection Information

    You can attend the meeting online using a computer, tablet, or 
smartphone; or by phone only. Connection information will be posted 
online at: https://meetings.npfmc.org/Meeting/Details/2374.

Public Comment

    Public comment letters will be accepted and should be submitted 
electronically to https://meetings.npfmc.org/Meeting/Details/2374.
    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: August 31, 2021.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-19092 Filed 9-2-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Apogee Technology, Inc.,a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’sknowledge, that:

The Annual Report for theyear ended December 31, 2006 of the Company fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-KSBfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| Dated:  March 29, 2006 | /s/ Herbert M. Stein                                                                  |
|----------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                             | Herbert M. Stein                                                                      |
|                             | Chief Executive  Officer and President  (principal executive officer)            |
| Dated:  March 29, 2006 | /s/ Paul J.  Murphy                                                                   |
|                             | Paul J. Murphy                                                                        |
|                             | Chief Financial  Officer and Vice President of Finance  (principal financial officer) |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

----
##### 



Exhibit 24.1 DIRECTORS AND CERTAIN OFFICERS OF
NATIONAL PROCESSING, INC.. ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K POWER OF ATTORNEY The undersigned directors and officers of National Processing, Inc., an
Ohio corporation (the Corporation) which anticipates filing an Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the Corporations fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 with the
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, hereby
constitute and appoint David L. Zoeller, Carlton E. Langer, David E. Fountain
and Thomas A. Richlovsky, and each of them, with full power of substitution and
resubstitution, as attorneys or attorney of the undersigned, to sign in the
capacities indicated below, said Form 10-K, and any and all amendments and
exhibits thereto, or other documents to be filed with, or submitted to, the
Securities and Exchange Commission pertaining thereto, with full power and
authority to do and perform any and all acts and things whatsoever required and
necessary to be done in the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as
the undersigned could do if personally present, hereby ratifying and approving
the acts of said attorneys, and any of them, and any such substitute. EXECUTED this 10th day of March, 2004. /s/ Jon L. Gorney

Jon L. Gorney
    
    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Paul G. Clark

Paul G. Clark
    
    DirectorAureliano Gonzalez-Baz
    
    Director/s/ Jeffrey P. Gotschall

Jeffrey P. Gotschall
    
    Director




---



##### 



Preston B. Heller
    
    Director/s/ Jeffrey D. Kelly

Jeffrey D. Kelly
    
    Director/s/ J. Armando Ramirez

J. Armando Ramirez
    
    Director
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15D0056. SHERRI LONG, et al. v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE

ASSOCIATION.

In this dispossessory action, Sherri Long, Djuan Long, and others filed an

application for discretionary review from an order entered by the Magistrate Court

of Fulton County on or about September 4, 2014. “The only avenue of appeal

available from [a] magistrate court judgment is provided by OCGA § 15-10-41 (b)

(1), which allows for a de novo appeal to the state or superior court.” Handler v.

Hulsey, 199 Ga. App. 751 (406 SE2d 225) (1991). In other words, a party aggrieved

by a magistrate court ruling must first seek review in the state or superior court.

 The Georgia Constitution requires that “[a]ny court shall transfer to the

appropriate court in the state any civil case in which it determines that jurisdiction or

venue lies elsewhere.” 1983 Ga. Const., Art. 6, Sec. 1, Para. 8; Bosma v. Gunter, 258

Ga. 664 (373 SE2d 368) (1988). Accordingly, this case is hereby TRANSFERRED

to the State Court of Fulton County for disposition.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

09/26/2014

September 26, 2014
Opinion issued February 7, 2023

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 22 - 00879 - CV

——————————— ROLAND CORTEZ , Appella nt

V. TERESA LYNN CORTEZ , Appell e e On Appeal from the 328th District Court Fort Bend County, Texa s Trial Court Ca se No. 21 - DCV - 285934
MEMORANDU M OPINION On December 29, 2022, the Co urt issued an order referring this matter to mediation. O n Januar y 4, 2023 , the parties attended mediation and ente red into a Partial M ediated Sett lement Agreement Perta i ning to Temp o r ary Orders ( “ Mediated Settlement Agreement ”)
. O n January 11, 2023, the parties filed a Joint2

Motion to Set Aside Judgment and R e mand Pursuant to M ediated Settlement Agreement ( “Joint Mot ion ”)
. The parties request in the Joint Moti on th at t h is Court set aside the Final Decr e e of Divorce signed on October 11, 2022 w i thout regard to the merits and remand the c a se to the trial court for e ntry of te m po r ary orders consistent with the M ediated S ettlement A greement , and for further proceedings. Se e T EX . R. A PP . P. 42. 1(a) (2)(B) ; Stampede TX En ergy, LLC v. Bridgetex Pipel ine Co. , No. 01

- 18

- 00113

- CV , 2019 WL 758003, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1 st Dist.] F eb. 2 1 , 201 9, no pet. ) (mem. op.) (granting joint motion to dismiss appeal, setting aside trial co u rt ’ s judgment with out regard to
mer its, and remand ing to trial court for rendition of judgment) ; Correct Checks, Inc. v. Carew , No. 01

- 12

- 00128

- CV, 2012 WL 2159365, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] June 14, 2012, no pet.) (mem. op.) (same)
. The parti e s request that the Court order each party to bear his or her own appellate costs and that the
man date issue upon judg ment . See T EX . R. A PP . P. 18.1( c), 42.1(d). N o opinion has issued. See T EX . R. A P P . P. 42. 1 ( c )
. W e grant the parties ’ J oint M otion . We set aside the trial court ’ s October 11, 2022 judgment without regard to the merits, and remand the case to the trial court for entry of temporary orders consistent with the Mediated Settlement Agreement
. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42. 1(a) (2)(B) , 43 .2( f )
. We dir ect the Clerk of this Court that costs are to be taxed against the part ies who incurr ed same and to issue3

t he m andate concu rrently with this opinion and judgment
. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 18.1(c), 42 .1 (d) . W e dismiss a ll other pending motions as moot. P ER CU R IA M Panel c onsist s of J ustices Hightower , Rivas

- Molloy , an d F arris.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1280

SINCE HARDWARE (GUANGZHOU) CO., LTD.,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee,

v.

HOME PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant.

Ronald M. Wisla , Garvey Schubert Barer, of Wa shington, DC, argued for plaintiffappellee.

David S. Silverbrand , Trial Attorney, Commercial Li tigation Branch, Civil Division,

United States Department of Ju stice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee.

With him on the brief were Tony West , Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson

, Director, and Patricia M. McCarthy , Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief was

Thomas M. Beline , Attorney-International, Office of the Chief Counsel for Import

Administration, United States Department of Commerce, of Washington, DC.

Frederick L. Ikenson , Blank Rome LLP, of Washingt on, DC, argued for defendantappellant. Of counsel was Katia I. Fano

.

Appealed from: United States Court of International Trade

Judge Richard K. EatonNOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1280

SINCE HARDWARE (GUANGZHOU) CO., LTD.,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee,

v.

HOME PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant.



## Judgment

ON APPEAL from the UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

in CASE NO(S). 09-00123

This CAUSE having been hear d and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (LOURIE, FRIEDM AN, and PROST, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED December 17, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly, Clerk
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Pest Management Research: Sidney, MT
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    NPARL
                        Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory
                                    Agricultural Systems Research Unit
                                    Grasshoppers: Their Biology, Identification and ManagementSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Sidney, Montana Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory Pest Management Research PMRU Docs Grasshoppers: Their Biology, Identification and Management: Outbreak and Survey Info





- NPARL Home
- PMRU Home
- ASRU Home
- Site Highlights
- Outbreak and Survey Info
- ID Tools | Apps
- Grasshopper Management
- IPM Handbook
- USDA Research | Contact Info

Outbreak Info: 2013 Rangeland Hazard Mapheadline bar /ARSUserFiles/30320505/grasshopper/Extras/images/Maps/GH_wMC_2013.gif Return to Outbreak Info


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AU GUST 2 7 , 2013

NO. 03

- 13

- 00471

- CV

Zeb Ryan Cummins and Sharon Marie Cummins, Appellants

v.

Joe Harrison Carr, Donna Leslia Carr, Joe Derek Carr, and Carmen Marie Cadena, Appelle es

APPEAL FROM 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, RO SE, AND GOODWIN

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE ROSE

THIS CAUSE having this day come to be considered, and the Court is of the opinion that it is

w ithout jurisdiction of the cause and that the appeal should therefore be dismissed for want of

jurisdiction

. IT IS ACCORDINGLY ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of

jurisdiction. It is FURTHER ordered that the appellant s pay all costs relating to this appeal,

both in this Court and the court below

, and that this decision be certified below for observance.
Upper Colorado Region 

Salt Lake City, Utah 

For Release: March 9, 2009 

Media Contact: Doug Hendrix 

(801) 524-3837 

Technical Work Group to Meet in Phoenix on Colorado River 

Topics 

Salt Lake City, UT – Reclamation’s Upper Colorado Regional Office announced today that the 

Technical Work Group of the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program will meet, in Phoenix, 

Ariz., on March 16-17, 2009 to address topics related to the operation of Glen Canyon Dam and the 

Colorado River. 

Technical Work Group meetings are held regularly to discuss technical matters and facilitate 

recommendations for use by the Adaptive Management Work Group, a Federal Advisory Committee to 

the Secretary of the Interior on the operation of Glen Canyon Dam and management of downstream 

resources in Glen and Grand Canyons. 

Noteworthy agenda items at the meeting will include: Status report on the multi-agency Cultural 

Symposium; discussion and development of the 2010-11 Biennial Budget and Work plans; and a status 

report on the economic analysis completed related to hydropower production and flow regimes. The 

meeting is open to the public. 

The Technical Work Group is a sub-committee of the Adaptive Management Work Group and is 

comprised of technical representatives who represent members of the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive 

Management Program. Responsibilities of the Technical Work Group include developing criteria and 

standards for monitoring and research programs; providing periodic reviews and updates; and providing 

information, as necessary, to the Adaptive Management Work Group. 

The meeting will be held at the offices of the Arizona Department of Water Resources located at 3550 N. 

Central Avenue in the Verde Conference Room. The meeting will begin at 9:30 a.m. and conclude at 

5:00 p.m., PST, on Monday, March 16, and will run from 8:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., PST, on Tuesday, 

March 17, 2009. 

For more information on the Technical Work Group Meetings, please visit our Website at: 

http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/index.html. 

### 

Reclamation is the largest wholesale water supplier and the second largest producer of hydroelectric power in the United 

States, with operations and facilities in the 17 Western States. Its facilities also provide substantial flood control, 

recreation, and fish and wildlife benefits. Visit our website at www.usbr.gov.