alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

I,
Barney A. Richmond, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my
knowledge, the Quarterly Report of eCom eCom.com, Inc. on
Form 10-Q for the period ended February 28, 2009, (i) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) that the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of eCom
eCom.com, Inc.



|                         |  |                              
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------------
|Date:
September 10, 2010 |  | /S/    BARNEY
A.
RICHMOND    
|                         |  | Barney A. Richmond           
|                         |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                         |  | (Principal Executive Officer)

I, Richard C. Turner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SectionSection 1350,
that, to my knowledge, the Quarterly Report of eCom eCom.com, Inc. on
Form 10-Q for the period ended February 28, 2009, (i) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) that the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of eCom
eCom.com, Inc.



|                         |  |                              
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------------
|Date:
September 10, 2010 |  | /S/    RICHARD
C.
TURNER     
|                         |  | Richard C. Turner            
|                         |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|                         |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND BALANCE SHEETS OF INDUSTRI-MATEMATIK
INTERNATIONAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIAIRES ANNEXED HERETO AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                      41,982,000
<SECURITIES>                                69,416,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               24,499,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   210,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           141,594,000
<PP&E>                                      10,208,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,197,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             149,329,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       21,115,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       329,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 124,244,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               149,329,000
<SALES>                                     93,722,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            95,384,000
<CGS>                                       42,616,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               43,645,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            42,665,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             123,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             12,155,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,762,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          9,393,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 9,393,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30
        

</TABLE>
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT R UZANNA ASHOT SAR GSYAN, Pe titione r, v. LORETTA E. LYNC H, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 13-72851 Age n c y No. A099-589-992 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d

April 8, 2016 * * Pa sa de n a , C a l ifornia B e fore : SILVER

M AN a nd GR A B ER , C irc uit Judge s, a

nd DOR SEY, *** Distric t Judge . R uz anna Sargsy an, a

native and c i tiz e n of Arm e nia , pe titions for re vie w of a fina l orde r of re m ova l. W e have jurisdic tion pursua nt to 8 U.S.C . § 1252 a

nd 

# FIL ED APR 12 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public a t ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s tha

t this c a se is suita

ble for de c ision without ora

l a rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2). *** The Honora

ble Je nnife r A. Dorse y , Distric t Sta te s Distric t Judge for the D istric t of Ne v a da , sitting by de signa tion.re vie w for substa ntia l e vide nc e . Shre

stha v . Holde r

, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039, 1047-48 (9th C ir. 2010). Sargsy a n’ s inc onsiste nt te stim ony a bout the a lle ge d

M ay 2004 a ssa

ult a nd subse q ue nt hospital iz a tion provide s substa ntia l e vide n c e to support the a dve rse c re d ibility

finding. Se eid. a t 1046–47 (“Although inc onsiste nc ie s no longe r ne e d to go to the

he art of the pe titione r’ s c la im , whe n a n inc onsiste nc y

is a t the he art of the c la i m it doubtle s s is of gre a t we ight.” ). Furthe rm ore , substa ntia l e vide nc e supports the

finding tha

t Sa rgsy an did not sa

tisfa c torily

e xpla in the inc onsiste nc ie s.
Nor doe s the re m a ining e vide nc e in the re c ord c om pe l a finding tha

t Sargsy an m ore like ly

tha n not would be torture d

by the gove rnm e nt or with its a c quie sc e nc e if she re turns to Arm e nia . S e e id. at 1048–49 (If thea dve rse c re d ibility

de te rm inat ion is supporte d by substa ntia l e vide nc e , the re m a ining doc um e nts in there c o rd m ust c om pe l a finding of e ligibility

for re lie f unde r the C onve ntion Aga inst Torture ). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE W DE NIE D.

2
FILED 21 SEP '1515:43 USDC·ORE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

EUGENE DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Case No. 6:15-CR- ]~$' ..... ,1 fJ 

INFORMATION 

v. 

Count 1: Possession of Child Pornography 

18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B) and (b)(2) 

DANIEL FELMAN, 

Defendant. 

Forfeiture Allegation 

18 U.S.C. § 2253 

THE U.S. ATTORNEY CHARGES: 

COUNTl 

(Possession of Child Pornography) 

On or before May 30,2015, in the District of Oregon, defendant DANIEL FELMAN, 

knowingly and unlawfully possessed child pornography, as defined in Title 18, United States 

Code, Section 2256(8), which contained a visual depiction of a minor engaged in sexually 

explicit conduct, such image having been mailed, shipped, and transported in or affecting 

interstate and foreign commerce by any means, including by computer; 

In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 2252A(a)(5)(B) and (b)(2). 

Information Page 1 

Case 6:15-cr-00348-AA Document 1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 1 of 2
FORFEITURE ALLEGATION 

Upon conviction of the offense listed above, defendant DANIEL FELMAN shall forfeit 

to the United States pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 2253, any and all matters 

which contains visual depictions transported, shipped, distributed, or possessed in violation 

thereof, and any and all property used or intended to be used in any manner or part to commit or 

to promote the commission of the aforementioned violations. 

Dated this 21st day of September 2015. 

J. WILLIAMS 

t United States Attorney 

Information Page2 

Case 6:15-cr-00348-AA Document 1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors
Opticon Medical Inc:

We consent to the inclusion of our report dated March 24, 2000, with respect to
the balance sheet of Opticon Medical Inc. (a development stage enterprise) as of
December 31, 1999, and the related statements of operations, stockholders'
equity (deficit), and cash flows for the year then ended and the period from
July 28, 1994 (date of inception) to December 31, 1999, which report appears in
the Form 10-KSB of Immune Response, Inc. dated March 30, 2000. The cumulative
statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the
period July 28, 1994 (inception) to December 31, 1999 include amounts for the
period from July 28, 1994 (inception) to December 31, 1998 and year ended
December 31, 1998, which were audited by other auditors whose report has been
furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included
for the period July 28, 1994 through December 31, 1998 is based solely on the
report of the other auditors.

Our report dated March 24, 2000, contains an explanatory paragraph that states
that Opticon Medical Inc. has suffered recurring losses from operations and has
a net capital deficiency, which raise substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.


                                             /s/ KPMG LLP
                                             KPMG LLP

Columbus, Ohio
March 30, 2000
#### BARR, Respondent, v. FISH et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fifth Department.

December 28, 1895.)

Action by Joseph A. Barr against Henry L. Fish and another.

No opinion. Motion to reconsider the order previously made (35 N. Y. Supp. 1103), and for leave to appeal to the court of appeals, granted.
Exhibit 32.1
   CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
   In connection with the Annual Report of mPhase Technologies, Inc., a New Jersey corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Ronald A. Durando, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:
  1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Ronald A. Durando
 Ronald A. Durando
 Chief Executive Officer
  February 6, 2013
Exhibit 23.1

# Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors
and ShareholdersAntares Pharma, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-20389, 333-40483, 333-64480,
333-111177) on Form S-8, registration statements (Nos. 333-61950, 333-96739, 333-103958)
on Form S-3 and registration statement (No. 333-109114) on Form S-2 of Antares Pharma,
Inc. (formerly known as Medi-Ject Corporation) of our reports dated March 16, 2005,
with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Antares Pharma, Inc. and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
shareholders equity and comprehensive loss, and cash flows for each of the years in
the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, and the related financial statement
schedule, which reports appear in the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of
Antares Pharma, Inc.

/s/
KPMG LLP

Minneapolis, MinnesotaMarch
 17, 2005
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7287
EDMUND GEORGE NOWICKI, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA02-2116-PJM) Submitted: November 21, 2002 Decided: December 3, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edmund George Nowicki, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Edmund Nowicki, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000), which it construed as a petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. See Nowicki v. State of Maryland , No. CA-02-2116-PM (D. Md. July 24, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
WILBORL"I LAW OFFICE, P.C. 

Tilvf WILBORL"I, Attorney at Law - OSB # 944644 

tim@wilbornlaw.com 

P.O. Box 370578 

Las Vegas, NV 89137 

Voice: (702) 240-0184 

Fax: (503) 926-9133 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

TERESA GOODING, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

COMMISSIONER of Social Security, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 1:15-cv-1921-PK 

PROF !!!Jilli: ORDER 

Attorney fees in the amount of $8,981. 78 are hereby awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to the 

Equal Access To Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412( d). Subject to any offset allowed under the Treasury 

Offset Program, payment of this award shall be made via check sent to Tim Wilborn's address: P.O. 

Box 370578, Las Vegas, NV 89137. hi accordance with the fee assignment which Plaintiff has 

signed, payment shall be made in T' Wilborn's name if no debt subject to offset exists. 

DATED this l/.e~yof___.,~~~--' 016. 

Submitted on December 13, 2016 by: 

s/ Tim Wilborn 

TIM WILBORN, OSB # 944644 

(702) 240-0184 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

ORDER - Page 1 

Case 1:15-cv-01921-PK Document 20 Filed 12/16/16 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-1044

CATHERINE ALEXANDER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. 

George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge. (8:20-cv-00617-GJH)

Submitted: April 14, 2022 Decided: April 19, 2022

Before DIAZ and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Catherine Alexander, Appellant Pro Se. Renee Lynn Bowen, FRANKLIN & PROKOPIK, 

Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1044 Doc: 14 Filed: 04/19/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Catherine Alexander seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing her civil 

complaint as barred by the statute of limitations. We dismiss the appeal for lack of 

jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

In civil cases, parties have 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final 

judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court 

extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under 

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a 

jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court entered its order on November 30, 2021. Alexander filed the

notice of appeal on January 11, 2022. Because Alexander failed to file a timely notice of 

appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1044 Doc: 14 Filed: 04/19/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
# C_2009150EN.01000301.xml

| 2.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 150/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 150/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5536 — Bluebay HYI/Bluebay MSI/Honsel AG)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 150/05

On 23 June 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5536. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5536. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# L_2010234DE.01001701.xml

| 4.9.2010 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 234/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.9.2010

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 234/17

---

Berichtigung des Beschlusses 2009/917/JI des Rates vom 30. November 2009 über den Einsatz der Informationstechnologie im Zollbereich

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 323 vom 10. Dezember 2009
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 323 vom 10. Dezember 2009

Seite 26, Artikel 15, Absatz 3, Satz 2, Buchstabe a:

anstatt:

| „a) | mit einer Freiheitsstrafe oder einer die Freiheit beschränkenden Maßnahme der Sicherung und Besserung von mindestens zwölf Monaten oder“ |
| --- | --- |

„a)

mit einer Freiheitsstrafe oder einer die Freiheit beschränkenden Maßnahme der Sicherung und Besserung von mindestens zwölf Monaten oder“

muss es heißen:

| „a) | mit einer Freiheitsstrafe oder einer die Freiheit beschränkenden Maßnahme der Sicherung und Besserung mit einem Höchstmaß von mindestens zwölf Monaten; oder“. |
| --- | --- |

„a)

mit einer Freiheitsstrafe oder einer die Freiheit beschränkenden Maßnahme der Sicherung und Besserung mit einem Höchstmaß von mindestens zwölf Monaten; oder“.

Seite 30, Artikel 35:

anstatt:

„Sofern in diesem Beschluss nichts anderes bestimmt ist, werden die Maßnahmen zur Durchführung des ZIS-Übereinkommens sowie die in Artikel 34 Absatz 1 genannten Protokolle mit Wirkung vom 27. Mai 2011 aufgehoben.“

muss es heißen:

„Sofern in diesem Beschluss nichts anderes bestimmt ist, werden die Maßnahmen zur Durchführung des ZIS-Übereinkommens sowie der in Artikel 34 Absatz 1 genannten Protokolle mit Wirkung vom 27. Mai 2011 aufgehoben.“

---
#### RICHARD ABELES, *ET AL.,*PLAINTIFFS-PETITIONERS, v. ADAMS ENGINEERING CO., INC., DEFENDANTRESPONDENT.

*Messrs. Jacob & Martin 8. Fox*and *Mr. Howard T. Rosen*for the petitioners.

*Messrs. Lum, Biunno & Tompkins, Mr. William A. Wachenfeld, Mr. Saul G. 8chulter*and *Mr. Herbert D. Kelleher*for the respondent.

February 14, 1961.

Granted.
FISCAL YEAR 2009 PROJECT REPORT FOR THE GLEN CANYON DAM ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT 

PROGRAM 

(1.) PROJECT NUMBER/TITLE: (From 

Final FY09 Annual Work Plan)

(2.) PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR INFORMATION:

Program Manager Principal 

Investigator: 

E-mail: E-mail 

Telephone: Telephone: 

(3.) STUDY OVERVIEW: (Briefly summarize need for project, study goals, objectives, etc., from Final FY2009 AWP 

(4.) REPORT ON FY2009 ACTIVITIES, ACCOMPLISHMENTS, AND SHORTFALL: (Summarize major tasks in the 

FY2009 AWP. Describe how each task was/was not met. Summarize initial findings and/or final results. Include a description of 

any significant deviation from the AWP Scope of Work.)

(5.) BRIEF SUMMARY OF KNOWLEDGE RELATED TO KEY STRATEGIC SCIENCE QUESTIONS BEING 

ADDRESSED BY THE PROJECT (Summarize how this project is addressing the key strategic science questions, 

what has been learned or remains to be learned relative to the key strategic science questions) 

(6.) REPORTS/PRODUCTS COMPLETED: (Include all deliverables identified in the AWP that have been completed and 

report on all products beyond those deliverables identified. Include reports, presentations, poster sessions, exhibits, databases, 

workshops, maps, website contributions, decision support systems, newsletters, etc.)

(7.) REPORTS/PRODUCTS PLANNED: 

(See above, but report those items that are in progress and include expected delivery dates.)

(8.) RECOMMENDATIONS: (Describe recommendations for continuation or modification of project, other studies, or activities 

resulting from findings of this project; recommendations for MRP changes or future program guidance, etc.)

(9.) FY2009 BUDGET REPORT FINANCIAL INFORMATION COLLECTION DATE: 

FY PLANNED GROSS BUDGET: FISCAL YEAR NET AVAIL BAL: 

FISCAL YEAR EXPENDITURES/ OBLIGATIONS: 

END OF FISCAL YEAR AVAILABLE BALANCE: 

COMMENTS: (Discuss anomalies in the budget; expected changes; anticipated carryover; etc.)

. 

SIGNATURE: 

(Must be signed or 

submitted by PM.) 

TITLE: Program Manager DATE: 

SIGNATURE: 

(Must be signed or 

submitted by PI.) 

TITLE: Principal Investigator DATE:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<CIK>                               0000826345
<NAME>                              GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED PSHIP II-B

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                   372,838
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                            512,039
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         884,877
<PP&E>                                21,399,549
<DEPRECIATION>                        19,140,134
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         3,374,612
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    111,202
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                             3,165,881
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           3,374,612
<SALES>                                2,693,717
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       2,724,754
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          1,724,426
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        1,000,328
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    1,000,328
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                           1,000,328
<EPS-BASIC>                                 2.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>