alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 19-2067

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v. Ricky Brian Gurley lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Jefferson City

____________ Submitted: March 13, 2020 Filed: May 11, 2020 [Unpublished]

____________ Before GRUENDER, WOLLMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Ricky Brian Gurley pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2), and was sentenced to twenty-four months’ imprisonment. As a special condition of supervised release, the district

court 1 prohibited him from using social networking sites. We find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s decision to do so. See United States v. Sherwood, 850 F.3d 391, 395 (8th Cir. 2017) (standard of review). In imposing the special condition, the court considered that Gurley’s bond had been revoked, in part, because Gurley had posted on Facebook that certain individuals were working covertly with law enforcement. The district court thus completed the requisite “individualized inquiry” before imposing the special condition, which we conclude was “reasonably related” to Gurley’s history of cyberbullying. See United States v. Carson, 924 F.3d 467, 474 (8th Cir. 2019) (citations omitted); see also 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d). Gurley also argues that the indictment was insufficient because it failed to allege that he knew of his prohibited status under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). See Rehaif v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 2191, 2200 (2019). The language of his indictment closely followed the language of § 922(g)(1), however, and we thus conclude that it sufficiently charged Gurley with being a felon in possession of a firearm. See United States v. Jawher, 950 F.3d 576, 579 n.2 (8th Cir. 2020) (rejecting defendant’s challenge to the indictment because the indictment “closely tracked the [statutory] language . . . and sufficiently charged [the defendant] with being a prohibited person in possession of a firearm”). The judgment is affirmed.

______________________________

1 The Honorable Brian C. Wimes, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. -2-
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Laura Yturrino, Appellant.

— Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph Cerbone, J.), rendered December 9, 1985, which convicted defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of the crime of manslaughter in the first degree (Penal Law § 125.20), and sentenced her to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of from *3 Vs*to 10 years, is unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, only to the extent of reducing the sentence to 2 to 6 years, and otherwise affirmed.

Upon the basis of our examination of the probation report, we find this defendant’s sentence to be excessive, inasmuch as she was 19 years old at the time that the crime was commit*278ted, does not have a prior record, is the mother of an approximately three-year-old boy, and appears to us to possess the potential to be a productive and law-abiding member of society. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Rosenberger and Ellerin, JJ.
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the

Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the

Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound

volumes go to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 1 8

- BG

- 215

IN RE DAVID E. FURRER

201 8 D DN 29

A Member of the Bar of the

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Bar Reg. No. 4 46343

BEFORE: Glickman and Easterly

, Associate Judge s

, and Nebeker , Senior Judge.

ORDER

(FILED

– May 24, 2018)

On consideration of the certified order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland

indefinitely suspending respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction by

consent ; this court’s March 9 , 201 8 , order directing respondent to show cause why

the functionally

- equivalent discipline of a n indefinite suspension with a fitness

requirement, with the right to file for reinstatement after five years or after

reinstatement by the state of Maryland, which e ver occurs first, should not be

imposed ; the motion of Disciplinary Counsel for leave to file his lodged late

response; and it appearing that respondent failed to file either a response to the

court’s show cause order or his D.C. Bar R. XI, §14 (g) affidav it , it is

ORDERED that the motion of Disciplinary Counsel is granted and the

lodged response is filed. It is

ORDERED that David E. Furrer is hereby indefinitely suspended with a

fitness requirement . He may file for reinstatement after five years or after

reinstatement by the state of Maryland, which ever occurs first. See In re Sibley

, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010), and In re Fuller , 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007)2

(No. 18

- BG

- 215)

(rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in

which th e respondent does not participate). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reins tatement respondent’s

suspension will not begin to run until such time as he files a D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14

(g) affidavit

.

PER CURIAM
# L_2009055EN.01004401.xml

| 27.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 55/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 55/44

---

COUNCIL COMMON POSITION 2009/164/CFSP

of 26 February 2009

renewing measures in support of the effective implementation of the mandate of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 15 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 30 March 2004, the Council adopted Common Position 2004/293/CFSP renewing measures in support of the effective implementation of the mandate of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) (1). These measures were renewed again by Common Position 2008/223/CFSP (2) until 16 March 2009. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 30 March 2004, the Council adopted Common Position 2004/293/CFSP renewing measures in support of the effective implementation of the mandate of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) (1). These measures were renewed again by Common Position 2008/223/CFSP (2) until 16 March 2009.

| (2) | The measures imposed by Common Position 2004/293/CFSP should be renewed for a further period of 12 months, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The measures imposed by Common Position 2004/293/CFSP should be renewed for a further period of 12 months,

HAS ADOPTED THIS COMMON POSITION:

Article 1

Common Position 2004/293/CFSP shall be extended until 16 March 2010.

Article 2

This Common Position shall take effect on the date of its adoption.

Article 3

This Common Position shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 26 February 2009.

For the Council

The President

I. LANGER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 94, 31.3.2004, p. 65.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 70, 14.3.2008, p. 22.

2

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1674 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1674

       To amend title 11 of the United States Code to modify the 
 dischargeability of debts for certain educational payments and loans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 26, 2015

    Mr. Cohen (for himself, Mr. Danny K. Davis of Illinois, and Mr. 
   Swalwell of California) introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To amend title 11 of the United States Code to modify the 
 dischargeability of debts for certain educational payments and loans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Private Student Loan Bankruptcy 
Fairness Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. EXCEPTIONS TO DISCHARGE.

    Section 523(a)(8) of title 11, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking subparagraph (B), and
            (2) in subparagraph (A)--
                    (A) in clause (i)--
                            (i) by striking ``(i)'', and
                            (ii) by inserting ``any program for which 
                        substantially all of the funds are provided by 
                        a'' after ``unit or'', and
                    (B) in clause (ii)--
                            (i) by striking ``(ii)'' and inserting 
                        ``(B)'', and
                            (ii) by striking ``or'' at the end.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS.

    (a) Effective Date.--Except as provided in subsection (b), this Act 
and the amendments made by this Act shall take effect on the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Application of Amendments.--The amendments made by this Act 
shall apply only with respect to cases commenced under title 11 of the 
United States Code on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarter Report of B-Teller, INC., (the “Company”) on Form
      10-QSB for the quarter ended October 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Armando Russo,
      President and J. A. Claydon, Secretary, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      That
      to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





B-TELLER
      USA, INC.





By/s/
                Armando Russo**President**By/s/J.
                A. Claydon**Secretary**May
                25, 2006
# L_2009330EN.01007901.xml

| 16.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 330/79 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 330/79

---

POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION EUPM/1/2009

of 15 December 2009

concerning the extension of the mandate of the Head of Mission of the European Union Police Mission (EUPM) in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH)

(2009/958/CFSP)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 38 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2009/906/CFSP of 8 December 2009 on the European Union Police Mission (EUPM) in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) (1), and in particular Article 10(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Under Article 10(1) of Decision 2009/906/CFSP, the Political and Security Committee (PSC) is authorised, in accordance with Article 38 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purposes of political control and strategic direction of EUPM and in particular to appoint a Head of Mission. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Under Article 10(1) of Decision 2009/906/CFSP, the Political and Security Committee (PSC) is authorised, in accordance with Article 38 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purposes of political control and strategic direction of EUPM and in particular to appoint a Head of Mission.

| (2) | On 24 October 2008, upon a proposal by the Secretary General/High Representative (SG/HR), the PSC appointed by its Decision 2008/835/CFSP (2) Mr Stefan FELLER as Head of Mission of EUPM until 31 December 2009. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 24 October 2008, upon a proposal by the Secretary General/High Representative (SG/HR), the PSC appointed by its Decision 2008/835/CFSP (2) Mr Stefan FELLER as Head of Mission of EUPM until 31 December 2009.

| (3) | On 13 November 2009, the SG/HR proposed to the PSC that it extend the mandate of Mr Stefan FELLER as Head of Mission of EUPM for an additional year, until 31 December 2010. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On 13 November 2009, the SG/HR proposed to the PSC that it extend the mandate of Mr Stefan FELLER as Head of Mission of EUPM for an additional year, until 31 December 2010.

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The mandate of Mr Stefan FELLER as Head of Mission of the European Union Police Mission in Bosnia and Herzegovina is hereby extended until 31 December 2010.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

It shall apply until 31 December 2010.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 15 December 2009.

For the Political and Security Committee

The President

O. SKOOG

---

(1)  
  OJ L 322, 9.12.2009, p. 22.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 298, 7.11.2008, p. 30.

2

---
Engaging Navajo Nation 

Chapters in Historic 

Preservation and Survey 

Research
Navajo Nation Government Structure

• As a sovereign nation, the Navajo 

Nation has a central government

• Three Branch Government

• Executive –President & Vice President

• 11 Divisions including Division of 

Natural Resources

• Legislative – Speaker of the Council, 

24 Delegates representing 110 local 

Chapter Communities

• Judicial – Navajo Courts

• The Navajo Tribal Government is 

located in Window Rock, AZ
Research on the Navajo Nation

• The Navajo Nation Cultural Resources Protection Act (1988) 

created a cultural resources investigation permitting system.

• Heritage and Historic Preservation Department oversees researcharchaeological and ethnographic 

The Navajo Nation also created an Institutional Review Board (IRB) 

to oversee research involving human subjects and Navajo tribal 

members
IRB Research Protocol Application Guidelines

• The IRB is located Under the 

Division of Health

• Research proposals must be 

submitted to the IRB Chair:

Letter of Interest

Application to Chair

Researchers are then 

scheduled for the next 

IRB meeting
IRB con’t

• Abstract of the research 

project

• Community involvement

• Benefits to the Navajo Nation

• Research Project Description

• Informed Consent Description

• Certifications by the Private 

Investigators 
Approving Resolutions from Agency 

Councils of the Navajo Nation

(5 Agencies: Chinle, Eastern, Ft. 

Defiance, Shiprock, Tuba City)

Support letters from the CEO’s of 

NAIHS service units and NN Program 

Directors 

Copies of other approved IRB letters

Copy of written letter to the NNHHPD 

Office for ethnographic interviews (if 

applicable)
Certificate of Confidentiality (if 

necessary)

-Budget Outline

-Class C Permit from HHPD-THPO

All audio or videotaped interviews with individuals or focus 

group(s) will need to submit a Class 

C Permit Application with the 

Heritage & Historic Preservation 

Department

Submission of seventeen copies of 

proposal to the Navajo Nation IRB

Address: 

Attn: Navajo IRB Coordinator

Navajo Division of Health

Window Rock, BLVD, Admin. Bldg. #2

P.O. Box 1390

Window Rock, AZ 86515
Navajo Perspectives on Colorado River 

Resources

• Tohatchi Chapter

Eastern

• Bodaway-Gap Chapter

Western

• Indian Wells Chapter

Ft. Defiance

• Coalmine Chapter

Western
Thank you

• Melinda Arviso-Ciocco, Navajo 

Cultural Specialist

• 928-871-7198

• maciocco@navajo-nsn.gov

Navajo Nation Heritage & 

Historic Preservation 

Department-Glen Canyon 

Adaptive Management Program

Division of Natural Resources
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1752 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make members of health 

care sharing ministries eligible to establish health savings accounts. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 13, 2015 

Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. POSEY, Mr. 

MOONEY of West Virginia, Mr. HUELSKAMP, Mr. POMPEO, Mr. ROE of 

Tennessee, Mr. HUIZENGA of Michigan, Mr. BABIN, Mrs. BLACKBURN, 

Mr. PITTS, Mr. JONES, Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania, Mr. HULTGREN, 

Mr. HARRIS, Mr. PETERSON, Mr. HARPER, Mr. RODNEY DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. GIBBS, Mr. TIPTON, Mr. WALBERG, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. 

ROSKAM, Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio, Mr. JOLLY, Mr. MESSER, Mr. MCCAUL, 

and Mrs. BLACK) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make 

members of health care sharing ministries eligible to 

establish health savings accounts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1752 IH

1 SECTION 1. MEMBERS OF HEALTH CARE SHARING MIN2 ISTRIES ELIGIBLE TO ESTABLISH HEALTH 

3 SAVINGS ACCOUNTS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 223 of the Internal Rev5 enue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the 

6 following new subsection: 

7 ‘‘(i) APPLICATION TO HEALTH CARE SHARING MIN8 ISTRIES.—For purposes of this section, membership in a 

9 health care sharing ministry (as defined in section 

10 5000A(d)(2)(B)(ii)) shall be treated as coverage under a 

11 high deductible health plan.’’. 

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

13 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

14 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.4
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Colmena Corp. on Form 10-QSB for
the period  ending  June 30,  2004 as filed  with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, Adam C. Wasserman,  Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Adam C. Wasserman
Adam C. Wasserman
Chief Financial Officer and Controller
August 12, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 170 (Tuesday, September 7, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50102-50103]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19200]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EF21-5-000]


Western Area Power Administration; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on August 20, 2021, Western Area Power 
Administration submitted tariff filing: Fiscal Year 2022 Base Charge 
and Rates for Boulder Canyon Project, to be effective 10/1/2021.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments, 
protests

[[Page 50103]]

and interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically may mail similar 
pleadings to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426. Hand delivered submissions in 
docketed proceedings should be delivered to Health and Human Services, 
12225 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the 
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an 
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the 
internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://ferc.gov) using the 
``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three 
digits in the docket number field to access the document. At this time, 
the Commission has suspended access to the Commission's Public 
Reference Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National Emergency 
concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), issued by the 
President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3c7a796e7f7352505552596f494c4c534e487c5a594e5f125b534a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="89cfccdbcac6e7e5e0e7ecdafcf9f9e6fbfdc9efecfbeaa7eee6ff">[email protected]</span></a> or call toll-free, 
(886) 208-3676 or TYY, (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on September 20, 2021.

    Dated: August 31, 2021.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-19200 Filed 9-3-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2009160EN.01000501.xml

| 14.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 160/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 160/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5505 — CELESIO/PHARMEXX)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 160/02

On 1 July 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5505. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5505. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---