alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00390-CR

NO. 03-13-00391-CR

NO. 03-13-00392-CR

Andria Stanley, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 390TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NOS. D-1-DC-12-300267, D-1-DC-12-300754, & D-1-DC-12-300755

THE HONORABLE JULIE H. KOCUREK, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R A N D M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s brief in these appeals was originally due October 28, 2013. In response

to a notice that the brief is overdue, appellant’s attorney, Alexander Calhoun, filed a motion

requesting an extension of time to file the brief. The motion was granted, making the brief due

January 16, 2014. No brief was filed. This Court again sent a notice that the brief is overdue. In

response to that second notice, counsel again filed a motion requesting an extension of time to file

the brief. That motion was granted, making the brief due March 21, 2014, and counsel was advised

that no further extensions would be granted. To date, no brief has been filed.

These appeals are abated and remanded to the trial court. The trial court shall conduct

a hearing to determine whether appellant desires to prosecute these appeals and, if so, whether
counsel has abandoned the appeals. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). The court shall make

appropriate findings and recommendations. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). If necessary, the

court shall appoint substitute counsel who will effectively represent appellant in these appeals. 

Following the hearing, which shall be transcribed, the trial court shall order the appropriate

supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records—including all findings and orders—to be prepared and

forwarded to this Court no later than May 23, 2014. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(3).

It is so ordered on this the 24th day of April, 2014.

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Rose

Abated and Remanded

Filed: April 24, 2014

Do Not Publish

2
Technical Work Group Meeting 

DRAFT AGENDA 

(P:\forms\Agenda-TWG.doc) 

Glen Canyon Dam 

Adaptive Management Program 

Technical Work Group Meeting 

Arizona Dept. of Water Resources 

500 N. 3rd Street, 3rd Floor, Conf. Rooms A& B 

Phoenix, Arizona 

January 7, 2003 

START 

TIME TOPIC PERSON PURPOSE MATERIALS 

8 a.m. Budget AHG Meeting Develop recommendation to 

TWG for FY 05 Budget / Work 

Plans 

Draft BOR/GCMRC 

Budget & Work 

Plans & BAHG 

Responses 

Noon LUNCH 

1 p.m. Welcome and 

Administrative 

Norm Henderson 1. Introductions and 

 Determination of Quorum 

2. Review Action Items from 

 Nov. 12-13, 2003 Meeting 

 

3. Approval of Nov. 12-13, 

2003 Meeting Minutes 

Agenda 

Action Items/ 

Draft Minutes 

1:15 p.m. Budget & Work Plans GCMRC Staff Responses to Comments and 

Questions 

Draft BOR/GCMRC 

Budget, Work 

Plans, & 

Response Table 

3:15 p.m. B R E A K 

3:30 p.m. 

Budget AHG Budget & 

Work Plan 

Recommendation 

Dennis Kubly Information and Discussion Recommendations

5 p.m. Wrap-up and Adjourn Norm Henderson 
Technical Work Group Meeting 

D R A F T AGENDA 

Glen Canyon Dam 

Adaptive Management Program 

Technical Work Group Meeting 

Arizona Dept. of Water Resources 

500 N. 3rd Street, 3rd Floor, Conf. Rooms A& B 

Phoenix, Arizona 

January 8, 2003 

START 

TIME TOPIC PERSON PURPOSE MATERIALS 

8 a.m. Welcome and 

Administrative 

Norm Henderson 

8:15 a.m. FY 2005 Budget and 

Work Plans Norm Henderson Provide recommendation to 

AMWG 

Draft BOR/GCMRC 

Budget, Work 

Plans 

9:30 a.m. B R E A K 

9:45 a.m. 

WAPA Flow Proposal 

& GCMRC Response 

Clayton Palmer 

Jeff Lovich 

Provide recommendation to 

AMWG 

Flow Proposal & 

Response 

11 a.m. 

GCMRC Strategic 

Plan 

 -Core Monitoring Plan 

 -Long-term 

Experimental Plan 

Jeff Lovich Input from TWG to GCMRC Strategic Plan 

Framework 

Noon L U N C H 

1 p.m. GCMRC Strategic 

Plan (cont) 

Jeff Lovich Input from TWG to GCMRC Strategic Plan 

Framework 

2 p.m. Outyear Budget 

Process Dennis Kubly Input from TWG to Budget 

AHG 

Existing 

Recommendations 

& Concerns

3 p.m. Wrap-up and Adjourn Norm Henderson Input from TWG to Budget 

AHG
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We have issued our report dated April 28, 2008 on LCC International, Inc. and Subsidiaries,accompanying the consolidated financial statements and management’s assessment of the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of LCC InternationalInc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference of said report in the Registration Statement of LCC International Inc. on Forms S-8 (No.333-133970, effective on May 10, 2006, No. 333-97835, effective August 9, 2003, 333-40702,effective June 30, 2000, 333-86207, effective August 31, 1999 and No. 333-17803, effective December13, 1996.)/s/ Grant Thornton LLPMcLean, Virginia
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Pest Management Research: Sidney, MT
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    NPARL
                        Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory
                                    Agricultural Systems Research Unit
                                    Grasshoppers: Their Biology, Identification and ManagementSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Sidney, Montana Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory Pest Management Research PMRU Docs Grasshoppers: Their Biology, Identification and Management: Outbreak and Survey Info





- NPARL Home
- PMRU Home
- ASRU Home
- Site Highlights
- Outbreak and Survey Info
- ID Tools | Apps
- Grasshopper Management
- IPM Handbook
- USDA Research | Contact Info

Outbreak Info: 2022 Rangeland Hazard Mapheadline bar /ARSUserFiles/30320505/2022_GH_Hazard_wMC.jpg Return to Outbreak Info


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
RULE 7.1 Page 1 of 1

Carl D. Crowell, OSB No. 982049

email: carl@crowell-law.com

Drew P. Taylor, OSB No. 135974

email: drew@crowell-law.com

CROWELL LAW

P.O. Box 923

Salem, OR 97308

(503) 581-1240

Of attorneys for plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON

COUNTRYMAN NEVADA, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

DOE-98.246.177.239,

Defendant.

 Case No.: 3:15-cv-02227 

PLAINTIFF’S RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE

PLAINTIFF’S RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, plaintiff states no parent corporation or 

any publicly held corporation owns 10% or more interest (stock) in the LLC.

DATED: November 29, 2015.

/s/ Carl D. Crowell

Carl D. Crowell, OSB No. 982049

email: carl@crowell-law.com

Drew P. Taylor, OSB No. 135974

email: drew@crowell-law.com

(503) 581-1240

Of attorneys for plaintiff

Case 3:15-cv-02227-SI Document 2 Filed 11/29/15 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I, Scott Scherr, Chief Executive Officer of The Ultimate Software Group, Inc., hereby certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that this Annual Report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The Ultimate Software Group, Inc.




/s/ Scott Scherr


Scott Scherr


Chief Executive Officer




Date:           March 1, 2011


74
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Colmena Corp. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony Q. Joffe,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:
          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The
          information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result
of operations of the Company.

/s/ Anthony Q. Joffe

Anthony Q. Joffe
President and Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2003


<PAGE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1744 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1744

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
  at 1300 Victoria Street in Laredo, Texas, as the ``George P. Kazen 
 Federal Building and United States Courthouse'', and to designate the 
jury room in that Federal building and United States courthouse as the 
                   ``Marcel C. Notzon II Jury Room''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 13, 2015

 Mr. Cuellar introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
  at 1300 Victoria Street in Laredo, Texas, as the ``George P. Kazen 
 Federal Building and United States Courthouse'', and to designate the 
jury room in that Federal building and United States courthouse as the 
                   ``Marcel C. Notzon II Jury Room''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BUILDING DESIGNATION.

    (a) Designation.--The Federal building and United States courthouse 
located at 1300 Victoria Street in Laredo, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``George P. Kazen Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal building and 
United States courthouse referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed 
to be a reference to the ``George P. Kazen Federal Building and United 
States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. JURY ROOM DESIGNATION.

    (a) Designation.--The jury room located in the Federal building and 
United States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be known and 
designated as the ``Marcel C. Notzon II Jury Room''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the jury room referred 
to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Marcel 
C. Notzon II Jury Room''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>




                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Dura Automotive Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Lawrence A. Denton, President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer) and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.





/s/ Lawrence A. Denton
-----------------------------

Lawrence A. Denton
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
March 8, 2004
# L_2009171EN.01004701.xml

| 1.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 171/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 171/47

---

COMMISSION DECISION

of 30 June 2009

appointing members of the Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/506/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to the Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1999 on orphan medicinal products (1), and in particular Article 4(3) thereof,

Having regard to the recommendation of the European Medicines Agency of 3 April 2009,

Whereas:

| (1) | The term of office of four members of the Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products, hereinafter ‘the Committee’, set up in accordance with Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 141/2000, expired on 15 April 2009. One member of the Committee whose term of office expired was appointed by the Commission on the basis of a recommendation from the European Medicines Agency. Three other members whose term of office expired were appointed by the Commission to represent patients organisations. It is necessary, therefore, to appoint four members to the Committee. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The term of office of four members of the Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products, hereinafter ‘the Committee’, set up in accordance with Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 141/2000, expired on 15 April 2009. One member of the Committee whose term of office expired was appointed by the Commission on the basis of a recommendation from the European Medicines Agency. Three other members whose term of office expired were appointed by the Commission to represent patients organisations. It is necessary, therefore, to appoint four members to the Committee.

| (2) | The European Medicines Agency has recommended one person for nomination. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The European Medicines Agency has recommended one person for nomination.

| (3) | The members of the Committee should be appointed for a period of three years starting on 1 July 2009, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The members of the Committee should be appointed for a period of three years starting on 1 July 2009,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

1.   The following is hereby appointed member of the Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Committee’, to represent patients organisations for a term of three years, from 1 July 2009:

Ms Lesley Claire GREENE.

2.   The following are hereby reappointed members of the Committee to represent patients organisations for a term of three years, from 1 July 2009:

| | Ms Birthe Byskov HOLM, |
| --- | --- |

Ms Birthe Byskov HOLM,

| | Dr Marie Pauline EVERS. |
| --- | --- |

Dr Marie Pauline EVERS.

Article 2

On the recommendation of the European Medicines Agency, the following is hereby reappointed member of the Committee for a term of three years, from 1 July 2009:

Dr David LYONS.

Done at Brussels, 30 June 2009.

For the Commission

Günter VERHEUGEN

Vice-President

---

(1)  
  OJ L 18, 22.1.2000, p. 1.

1

---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Nathaniel Dante RICE, Defendant—Appellant. *368United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Nathaniel Dante Rice, Defendant—Appellant.

Nos. 07-6020, 07-6178.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 25, 2007.

Decided: June 1, 2007.

Nathaniel Dante Rice, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller, Office of the United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Nathaniel Dante Rice seeks to appeal the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion and denying his motions for reconsideration and an extension of time to file a Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Rice has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeals. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
#### In the Matter of Hubert Linzy, Petitioner, v New York City Transit Authority, Respondent.

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York City Transit Authority, dated April 16, 1985, which, after a hearing, found the petitioner guilty of refusing to obey the order of a supervisor and dismissed him from his position as a railroad clerk.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

In view of the petitioner’s admission at the hearing that he refused to obey his supervisor’s order to provide a written statement concerning a prior incident, the Hearing Officer’s findings were supported by substantial evidence. In light of the petitioner’s extensive prior disciplinary record, the penalty imposed upon him was not so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness. Thompson, J. P., Rubin, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALNACE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             100
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      232
<ALLOWANCES>                                         5
<INVENTORY>                                        153
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   636
<PP&E>                                           1,331
<DEPRECIATION>                                     731
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,703
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,721
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,021)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,703
<SALES>                                             33
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   333
<CGS>                                               38
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      106
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   512
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 131
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (416)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (416)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)
        

</TABLE>
#### Richard Blatt, Appellant, v Touchstone Television Productions, LLC, Respondent.

[943 NYS2d 108]—

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Saliann Scarpulla, J.), entered on or about September 23, 2010, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Dismissal of this personal injury action was proper, since defendant purchaser of commercial plate glass from plaintiff’s company demonstrated that it owed no duty of care to plaintiff. Regardless of whether it was foreseeable that plaintiff might be injured loading the glass onto the truck defendant sent to pick it up, given the arm’s-length relationship of a buyer and seller of goods, and defendant’s contractual undertaking with the union whereby only union members were to load or unload the truck, there was no basis to find a duty of care owed to plaintiff *(see 532 Madison Ave. Gourmet Foods v Finlandia Ctr.,*96 NY2d 280, 289 [2001] [“(a)bsent a duty running directly to the injured person there can be no liability in damages, however careless *537the conduct or foreseeable the harm”]). Moreover, plaintiff’s volunteering to load the heavy glass onto the truck, without the participation or instruction from defendant’s employees, severed any causal connection between negligence on the part of defendant and the accident *(see Pouso v City of New York,*22 AD3d 395, 396 [2005]; *Murray v New York City Hous. Auth.,*269 AD2d 288 [2000]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Moskowitz, Renwick and Freedman, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2010 NY Slip Op 32667(U).]