alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
the December 31, 1998 Form 10-K and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements. 
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                      <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1998              JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1998              DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      1,260,569                1,449,785
<SECURITIES>                                  321,207                  304,753
<RECEIVABLES>                                 796,319                  779,769
<ALLOWANCES>                                  178,338                  136,335
<INVENTORY>                                         0                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            2,199,757                2,397,972
<PP&E>                                     20,850,543               23,968,633
<DEPRECIATION>                              5,356,448                5,472,407
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             17,693,852               20,894,198
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         284,438                  415,077
<BONDS>                                             0                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0                        0
<PREFERRED>                                         0                        0
<COMMON>                                            0                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                 17,409,414               20,479,121
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               17,693,852               20,894,198
<SALES>                                     2,764,028                2,961,558
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            3,622,550                3,448,300
<CGS>                                               0                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            1,975,559                1,196,912
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              122,860                   67,411
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             1,524,131                2,183,977
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         1,524,131                2,183,977
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0                        0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0                        0
<CHANGES>                                           0                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                1,524,131                2,183,977
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   32.60                    46.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   32.60                    46.72
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

JASON ANDREW WRIGHT, No. 2:14-cv-02058-JE

Petitioner, 

v.

STATE OF OREGON, ORDER

Respondent.

HERNANDEZ, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Jelderks issued a Findings & Recommendation (#78) on March 14,

2018, in which he recommends the Court deny Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus,

dismiss the case with prejudice, and decline to issue a Certificate of Appealability. Petitioner has

timely filed objections to the Findings & Recommendation. The matter is now before me

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). 

When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings &

Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the

1 - ORDER
Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th

Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).

I have carefully considered Petitioner's objections and conclude there is no basis to

modify the Findings & Recommendation. I have also reviewed the pertinent portions of the

record de novo and find no other errors in the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation. 

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Jelderks's Findings & Recommendation [78], and

therefore, Petitioner's Petition for Habeas Corpus [2] is denied and this case is dismissed with

prejudice. The Court declines to issue a Certificate of Appealability because Petitioner has not

made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

2253(c)(2). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this day of , 2018.

MARCO A. HERNANDEZ

United States District Judge

2 - ORDER
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

					NO. 2-09-146-CR				

JAMES RYAN GILES    						       	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	----------

	FROM THE 371ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered appellant’s “Motion For Voluntary Dismissal Of Appeal By Appellant James Ryan Giles.”  The motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).  No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.  See id.; Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

								PER CURIAM

PANEL:  CAYCE, C.J.; LIVINGSTON and DAUPHINOT, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: August 20, 2009
# C_2006173EN.01001001.xml

| 26.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 173/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 173/10

---

Publication of decisions by Member States to grant or revoke operating licenses pursuant to Article 13(4) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92 on licensing of air carriers (1)
   (2)

1

2

(2006/C 173/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

AUSTRIA

Operating licences revoked

Category B:   Operating licences including the restriction of Article 5(7)(a) of Regulation No 2407/92

| Name of air carrier | Address of air carrier | Permitted to carry | Decision effective since |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Kärntner Flughafen Betriebsges.m.b.H. | A-9020 Klagenfurt — Flughafen | passengers, mail, cargo | 18.5.2006 |

Name of air carrier

Address of air carrier

Permitted to carry

Decision effective since

Kärntner Flughafen Betriebsges.m.b.H.

A-9020 Klagenfurt — Flughafen

passengers, mail, cargo

18.5.2006

---

(1)  OJ L 240, 24.8.1992, p. 1.

1

(2)  Communicated to the European Commission before 31.8.2005.

2

---
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1861

To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to permit duty-free sales enterprises to

be located in certain areas.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 25, 1998

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to permit duty-free sales

enterprises to be located in certain areas.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DUTY-FREE SALES ENTERPRISES.

4 Section 555(b)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19

5 U.S.C. 1555(b)(2)) is amended—

6 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of subparagraph

7 (A),

8 (2) by striking the period at the end of sub9 paragraph (B) and inserting ‘‘; or’’, and
2

•S 1861 IS

1 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub2 paragraph:

3 ‘‘(C) the customs territory, if reasonable

4 assurance can be provided that the purchaser of

5 the duty-free merchandise will depart from an

6 international airport located within the customs

7 territory.’’.

Æ
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 Form 10-K/A
 (Amendment No. 1)
 þ
    
    ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For Fiscal Year Ended: March 31, 2009
 o
    
    TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the transition period from  to
 Commission file number: 0-17304
 Cistera Networks, Inc.
  Nevada
    
    91-1944887State or other jurisdiction of 
incorporation or organization
    
    (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 
  (972) 381-4699
   
  o þ
 o þ
 þ o
 o o
 o
  Large accelerated filer o
Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company þ o þ




---



##### 



EXPLANATORY NOTE




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  CISTERA NETWORKS, INC.Dated: February 1, 2010

    By
    /S/     Gregory T RoyalGregory T RoyalChief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)  Signatures
    
    Title/S/ Gregory T. Royal
    
    CEO/President/Chief TechnologyGregory T. Royal
    
    Officer and Director
Exhibit 32








SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of PacificHealth Laboratories, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Frederick Duffner, President of the Company, and Stephen P. Kuchen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on our knowledge:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





This Certification shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





DATE: August 4, 2010By:
/s/ Frederick DuffnerFrederick Duffner, President(Principal Executive Officer)DATE: August 4, 2010By:
/s/ Stephen P. KuchenStephen P. Kuchen, Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1997
(UNAUDITED) AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,815
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   63,523<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     49,238
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               124,075
<PP&E>                                         429,623
<DEPRECIATION>                                 159,979
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 491,252
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           71,664
<BONDS>                                        199,175<F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,467
<OTHER-SE>                                     168,140
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   491,252
<SALES>                                        318,417
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               318,417
<CGS>                                          226,775
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  226,775
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,779
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 41,238
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,918
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             24,560
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,560
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.98
<FN>
<F1>RECEIVABLES ARE PRESENTED NET OF THE ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS.
<F2>BONDS REPRESENT REVOLVING CREDIT LOANS AND LONG-TERM DEBT, LESS CURRENT
MATURITIES.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Meeting Evaluation Form

MEETING TYPE/NAME:_______________________________ DATE: _______________________

Guidelines No/Poor Yes/Great

Was there sufficient notice given to all participants? 1 2 3 4 5

Were the meeting leaders prepared? 1 2 3 4 5

Was the agenda distributed in advance? 1 2 3 4 5

Did the meeting participants come prepared? 1 2 3 4 5

Were the meeting objectives clearly stated in writing? 1 2 3 4 5

Did people come to the meeting prepared to make

decisions?

1 2 3 4 5

Did the leader know the results they were trying to achieve? 1 2 3 4 5

Were the issues manageable in the meeting time allowed? 1 2 3 4 5

Were the roles of the participants clearly defined and did

they know what was expected of them?

1 2 3 4 5

Were the “right” people invited to attend the meeting? 1 2 3 4 5

Did the key people attend the meeting? 1 2 3 4 5

Did the people in the meeting have appropriate authority to

make decisions?

1 2 3 4 5

Was this meeting necessary? 1 2 3 4 5

Did the meeting start on time? 1 2 3 4 5

Was the length of the meeting appropriate for the

discussion?

1 2 3 4 5

Did the meeting adjourn on time? 1 2 3 4 5

Did the leader use the meeting to make decisions? 1 2 3 4 5

Did you efficiently use the time available? 1 2 3 4 5

Did you complete the written agenda? 1 2 3 4 5

Were summary notes taken at the meeting? 1 2 3 4 5

Did you agree on a clear direction? 1 2 3 4 5

Did you do action planning at the end of the meeting? 1 2 3 4 5

Was someone appointed to keep the group on time and

focused?

1 2 3 4 5

Did you formally evaluate the meeting? 1 2 3 4 5

Did you treat each other with respect during the meeting? 1 2 3 4 5

Was the meeting focused and directed? 1 2 3 4 5

Did you avoid disruptive side conversations during the

meeting?

1 2 3 4 5

COMMENTS:
Glen Canyon Dam Technical Work Group 

Action Item Tracking Report 

(U:\c5amp\uc\rm\amp\twg\mtgs\16apr19\Action Items.docx)

 Updated: April 22, 2016 

Action Number 

(year.mo.dayno.) 

Action Item 

* Additional information in Meeting Minutes Assigned to Due Date Status 

2015:10-20-21(1) 10/20/15: The AMWG passed the following motion 

at their August 2015: The AMWG requests the 

Secretary’s Designee direct GCMRC to conduct a 

technical review of the Lees Ferry Recreational 

Trout Fishery Management Recommendations and 

report its findings to the TWG; and directs the TWG 

to evaluate the GCMRC review at its October 2015 

meeting, and report its findings to AMWG at its 

February 2016 meeting. 

 The Trout Ad Hoc Group was created to 

address the above report and make a 

recommendation to the TWG at its January 

2016 meeting. 

2/24/16: The AMWG passed the following motion: 

The AMWG accepts the December 9, 2015, Grand 

Canyon Monitoring and Research Center (GCMRC) 

Technical Memo (Memo) of the Lees Ferry Trout 

Fishery Management Recommendations 

(Recommendations) subject to the following: 

1. Any actions resulting from the 

Recommendations must be fully consistent with the 

“Law of the River” and Department of the Interior 

(DOI) policy considerations. 

2. Recommendations that fall under the purview 

of water and natural resource management 

agencies such as Bureau of Reclamation, National 

Park Service, United States Fish and Wildlife 

Service, Arizona Game and Fish Department, and 

AMWG Tribes will require additional evaluation 

among these management agencies within the AMP 

for further consideration. 

3. Recommendations that address dam 

operations are expected to be considered and 

evaluated in light of the ongoing Long-Term 

Experimental and Management Plan (LTEMP) 

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). 

In addition, the AMWG directs the TWG to consider 

the Recommendations with the caveats above and 

the Memo as work plans and budgets are 

developed or reviewed. 

4/19/16: New Charge to the TAHG: The TAHG will 

consider the Lees Ferry Trout Fishery Management 

Recommendations and the Grand Canyon 

Monitoring and Research Center Technical memo 

with the caveats per the AMWG motion on 

02/24/2016, as work plans and budgets are being 

developed and make a recommendation to the 

TWG through the Budget Ad Hoc Group. 

TWG Jan 28, 2016 Open 

1
Glen Canyon Dam Technical Work Group 

Attendance for June 30, 2004 

Conducting: Norm Henderson, Chairman 

Committee Members Present: 

Mary Barger, WAPA 

Jonathan Damp, Pueblo of Zuni 

William Davis, CREDA 

Lisa Force, Grand Canyon Trust 

Lloyd Greiner, UAMPS 

Christopher Harris, CRB/CA 

Amy Heuslein, BIA 

Matt Kaplinski, GCRG 

Robert King, UDWR 

Dennis Kubly, USBR 

Glen Knowles, USFWS 

Phillip S. Lehr, Colo. River Comm./NV 

Ken McMullen, NPS/GCNP 

Don Ostler, UCRC 

Bill Persons, AGFD 

D. Randolph Seaholm, CWCB 

Mark Steffen, Federation of Fly Fishers 

Larry Stevens, Gr. Canyon Wildlands Council 

Bill Werner, ADWR 

Michael Yeatts, The Hopi Tribe 

Committee Members Absent: 

Kerry Christensen, Hualapai Tribe 

Marklyn Chee, Navajo Nation 

Illa Bullets, So. Paiute Consortium 

John Shields, WY State Engineers Office 

Alternates Present: For: 

Chris Kincaid John Ritenour (retired), NPS/GLCA 

Don Ostler John Whipple, NM Interstate Stream Comm. 

Interested Persons: 

Jan Balsom, NPS/GRCA 

Mike Berry, USBR 

Gary Burton, WAPA 

Kurt Dongoske, CREDA 

Helen Fairley, USGS/GCMRC 

Dave Garrett, Science Advisor 

Lance Gunderson, Science Advisor 

Lisa Leap, NPS/GRCA 

Mike Liszewski, USGS/GCMRC 

Jeff Lovich, USGS/GCMRC 

Ted Melis, USGS/GCMRC 

Mary Orton, The Mary Orton Company 

R. Scott Rogers, AGFD 

David Ward, AGFD 

Scott Wright, USGS/GCMRC 

Meeting Recorder: Norm Henderson 
Glen Canyon Dam Technical Work Group 

Attendance for July 1, 2004 

Conducting: Norm Henderson, Chairman 

Committee Members Present: 

Mary Barger, WAPA 

Jonathan Damp, Pueblo of Zuni 

William Davis, CREDA 

Lisa Force, Grand Canyon Trust 

Amy Heuslein, BIA 

Matt Kaplinski, GCRG 

Robert King, UDWR 

Dennis Kubly, USBR 

Glen Knowles, USFWS 

Ken McMullen, NPS/GCNP 

Don Ostler, UCRC 

Bill Persons, AGFD 

D. Randolph Seaholm, CWCB 

Mark Steffen, Federation of Fly Fishers 

Larry Stevens, Gr. Canyon Wildlands Council 

Michael Yeatts, The Hopi Tribe 

Committee Members Absent: 

Kerry Christensen, Hualapai Tribe 

Marklyn Chee, Navajo Nation 

Illa Bullets, So. Paiute Consortium 

Lloyd Greiner, UAMPS 

Christopher Harris, CRB/CA 

Phillip S. Lehr, Colo. River Comm./NV 

John Shields, WY State Engineers Office

Alternates Present: For: 

Chris Kincaid John Ritenour (retired), NPS/GLCA 

Don Ostler John Whipple, NM Interstate Stream Comm. 

Interested Persons: 

Jan Balsom, NPS/GRCA 

Mike Berry, USBR 

Gary Burton, WAPA 

Kurt Dongoske, CREDA 

Helen Fairley, USGS/GCMRC 

Lisa Leap, NPS/GRCA 

Paul Li, IEDA 

Mike Liszewski, USGS/GCMRC 

Jeff Lovich, USGS/GCMRC 

Ted Melis, USGS/GCMRC 

Robert Snow, DOI 

Chris Updike, NAU 

Carl Walters, Presenter 

Scott Wright, USGS/GCMRC 

Meeting Recorder: Norm Henderson
Technical Work Group

Phoenix, Arizona

August 7, 2001

Presiding: Rick Johnson, Chairperson

Committee Members Present:

Robert Begay, Navajo Nation

Kerry Christensen, Hualapai Tribe

Dave Cohen, Trout Unlimited

Wayne Cook, UCRC

Jonathan Damp, Pueblo of Zuni

Bill Davis, CREDA

Kurt Dongoske, Hopi Tribe

Amy Heuslein, BIA

Matt Kaplinski, GCRG

Phillip Lehr, Colo. River Commission/NV

Don Metz, USFWS

S. Clayton Palmer, WAPA

Bill Persons, AGFD

Randall Peterson, USBR

D. Randolph Seaholm, CWCB

Nikolai Ramsey, Grand Canyon Trust

Robert Winfree, GRCA

Committee Members Absent:

Perri Benemelis, ADWR

Brenda Drye, So. Paiute Consortium

Lloyd Greiner, CREDA

Christopher Harris, CRBC

Norm Henderson, GLCA

Alternates Present:

Wayne Cook

Wayne Cook

Other Interested Persons:

Jan Balsom, GRCA

Paul Barrett, USFWS

Timothy Begay, NNHPO

Karen Blakney, USBR

Nancy Coulam, USBR

Leslie James, CREDA

Dennis Kubly, USBR

Lisa Leap, GRCA

Nancy Hornewer, USGS

Pamela Hyde, Southwest Rivers

Robert King, UDWR

John Shields, WY State Engineer’s Office

John Whipple, NM Interstate Stream Comm.

For:

John Whipple, NM Interstate Stream Comm.

John Shields, WY State Engineer’s Office

Ruth Lambert, GCMRC

Mike Liszewski, GCMRC

Ted Melis, GCMRC

David Orr, Living Rivers

Mary Orton, The Mary Orton Company

Jennifer Pitt, Environmental Defense

Barbara Ralston

Linda Whetton, USBR
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6327

STEVEN FAISON EL, Beneficiary Over: Steven Devaughn Faison Trust , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. US DEPARTMENT OF TREA S URY , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Statesville

. Frank D. Whitney , Chief District Judge. ( 5:17

- cv
- 00205

- FDW )

Submitted : October 23, 2018 Decided: October 25, 2018

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Steven Faison El, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Steven Faison El appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Faison El v . U.S. Dep’t of Treasury , No. 5:17

- cv
- 00205

- FDW (W.D.N.C. Mar. 21, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
ex_185446.htm


Exhibit 10.4


 





 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


27 December 2018, updated January 5, 2019


 


 


 


Dear Margaret:


 


 


 


We are pleased to promote you to Vice President, Corporate Controller and Principal Accounting Officer, effective January 1, 2019, reporting to Wouter Latour, CEO.


 


Your annual base salary will be increased to $265,000, effective January 1, 2019. Your target bonus% will be increased to 30%, effective January 1, 2019.


 


In addition, we will recommend to the Company’s Board of Directors that you be granted an incentive stock option to purchase 10,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The option will vest over 48 months, with a 12-month cliff and a vesting start date of January 1, 2019.


 


You will participate in the Executive Severance Benefit Plan (the “Plan”), under which, if you are terminated without Cause or you resign for Good Reason (as defined in the Plan) you will be eligible for severance of three months if there is no change in control, and six months if the termination results under a change in control.


 


Thank you for your support and contributions. 


 


 


 


Best regards


 


 


/s/ Wouter Latour


 


Wouter Latour


CEO