alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Shiels *et al.,*Appellants, *v.*Wortmann *et al.,*Respondents.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.*

July 18, 1890.)

Appeal from special term, Kings county.

Action by Andrew J. Shiels and others against Sigismund B. Wortmann and Margaret Smith. An extra allowance was granted to defendants in pursuance of a former decision of the general term, and plaintiffs appeal from such order, and move for a rehearing of the former appeal. For former report, see 8 H. Y. Supp. 799.

Argued before Barnard, P. J., and Dykman, J.

*Wüliam J. Gaynor,*for appellants. *Johnston & Johnston,*for respondents.

Dykman, J.

This is an appeal from an order for additional allowance made to the defendants. The plaintiffs submitted to a nonsuit at the circuit, and the trial judge refused to make any allowance to the defendants. Upon appeal to the general term that order was reversed, and subsequently an order for an additional allowance of $500 was made in pursuance of the decision of the general term, and now the plaintiffs have appealed from the last order. The plaintiffs have also made a motion- for a reargument of the first appeal. There seems to have been some misapprehension respecting the first appeal, and we think it will be safest to grant a reargument. We will therefore reverse the order for an allowance, and grant a reargument. In that case, if first order for an allowance be affirmed, that will dispose of the controversy; and if it be reversed, as it was before, then the defendants can make a new application for an additional allowance. Ho costs to either party on this appeal.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1996 EXTRACTED FROM THE ISSUER'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-KSB.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001016439
<NAME> INTELLIGROUP, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       7,479,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,538,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   546,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,756,000
<PP&E>                                       1,281,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 243,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,262,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,043,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       107,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,055,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,262,000
<SALES>                                     47,189,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            47,189,000
<CGS>                                       33,605,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               33,605,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,908,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,235,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,441,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   500,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,941,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              1,148,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   793,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0001000235
<NAME> PATRIOT BANK CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1.000
<CASH>                                           3,280
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          11,869
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     86,460
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         325,727
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           312,040
<LOANS>                                        684,276
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (6,159)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,176,420
<DEPOSITS>                                     647,333
<SHORT-TERM>                                   260,215
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              8,576
<LONG-TERM>                                    209,189
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      51,107
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,176,420
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 27,122
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               14,392
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   229
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                41,743
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              13,478
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,543
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           12,200
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      600
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 11,306
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,581
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,794
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .47
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.36
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,893
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 6,083
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      585
<RECOVERIES>                                        61
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                6,159
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          6,159


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Majestic Star Casino, LLC,
The Majestic Star Casino Capital Corp., and Majestic Star Casino Capital Corp.
II (collectively, the “Registrant”) for the year ended December 31, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), we, Don H. Barden, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Registrant, and Jon S. Bennett, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 (1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.
 
 Dated:
March 31, 2009
 
 /s/ Don H.
Barden
 Don H.
Barden
 President
and Chief Executive Officer
 The
Majestic Star Casino, LLC
 The
Majestic Star Casino Capital Corp.
 Majestic
Star Casino Capital Corp. II
 
 /s/ Jon S.
Bennett
 Jon S.
Bennett
 Senior
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
 The
Majestic Star Casino, LLC
 The
Majestic Star Casino Capital Corp.
 Majestic
Star Casino Capital Corp. II
# L_2009214EN.01004001.xml

| 19.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 214/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 214/40

---

POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION EUMM GEORGIA/1/2009

of 31 July 2009

concerning the extension of the mandate of the Head of Mission of the European Union Monitoring Mission in Georgia (EUMM Georgia)

(2009/619/CFSP)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 25 thereof,

Having regard to Joint Action 2008/736/CFSP of 15 September 2008 on the European Union Monitoring Mission in Georgia (EUMM Georgia) (1), and in particular Article 10(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Under Article 10(1) of Joint Action 2008/736/CFSP, the Political and Security Committee (PSC) is authorised, in accordance with Article 25 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purposes of political control and strategic direction of EUMM Georgia and in particular to appoint a Head of Mission. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Under Article 10(1) of Joint Action 2008/736/CFSP, the Political and Security Committee (PSC) is authorised, in accordance with Article 25 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purposes of political control and strategic direction of EUMM Georgia and in particular to appoint a Head of Mission.

| (2) | On 16 September 2008, upon a proposal by the Secretary-General/High Representative, the PSC appointed by its Decision EUMM/1/2008 (2) Mr Hansjörg HABER as Head of Mission of EUMM Georgia until 15 September 2009. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 16 September 2008, upon a proposal by the Secretary-General/High Representative, the PSC appointed by its Decision EUMM/1/2008 (2) Mr Hansjörg HABER as Head of Mission of EUMM Georgia until 15 September 2009.

| (3) | On 16 July 2009 the Secretary-General/High Representative proposed to the PSC that it extend the mandate of Mr Hansjörg HABER for an additional year, until 15 September 2010, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On 16 July 2009 the Secretary-General/High Representative proposed to the PSC that it extend the mandate of Mr Hansjörg HABER for an additional year, until 15 September 2010,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The mandate of Mr Hansjörg HABER as Head of Mission of the European Union Monitoring Mission in Georgia (EUMM Georgia) is hereby extended until 15 September 2010.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the day of its adoption.

It shall apply until 15 September 2010.

Done at Brussels, 31 July 2009.

For the Political and Security Committee

The Chairperson

O. SKOOG

---

(1)  
  OJ L 248, 17.9.2008, p. 26.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 319, 29.11.2008, p. 79.

2

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6837

LEMUEL L. MCGLONE, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM L. SMITH; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE

STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge;

John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge. (CA-95-3450-JFM)

Submitted: October 31, 1997 Decided: December 18, 19997

Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lemuel L. McGlone, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,

Attorney General, Gwynn X. Kinsey, Jr., Assistant Attorney General,

Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994) (current

version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have

reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the

recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to

appeal, see Lindh v. Murphy, 117 S. Ct. 2059 (1997), and dismiss

the appeal on the reasoning of the district court, see McGlone v.

Smith, No. CA-95-3450-JFM (D. Md. Feb. 3, 1997). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Glen Canyon Dam Technical Work Group 

Agenda Item Information 

September 29, 2009

Agenda Item

Update on Treatment Plan Implementation 

Action Requested

Information only. 

Presenters

Joel Pederson, Utah State University 

Background Information

The treatment of cultural sites along the Grand Canyon river corridor is in its second year. This 

presentation will provide an update on the project on three fronts. First highlights from the 2009 

excavation activities will be provided, now that the second of two field excursions has just been 

completed in mid-late September. Secondly, a very short update on the status of report and 

workplan products will be delivered. Lastly, a short description of USU’s personnel changes in the 

project starting for FY 2010 will be provided. This presentation is partly intended to provide a 

forum for addressing questions or clarifications about these personnel changes. 

 Page 1 
Goals

‐provide update on project and fi

‐relate major personnel changes i
Trajectory

‐FY 2009 = project year 2

‐2009 fieldwork done, analysis and re

‐year 1 (2008) annual report finished‐first step in 2010 workplan just comp

Review – approaches and researc

early Holocene

323
2009 work C:02:098 – Paria Riffle 

C:13:385 and 387 – Lower Unkar – Ma


Arroyo Grande
Personnel changes

‐USU subcontracts the archaeology

‐starting with FY 2010 work

‐USU Archaeological Services
New key personnel

‐Dr. Kenneth Cannon – project manag‐Dr. Ted Neff – Archaeology PI

‐Kimberly Spurr – field director/co‐PI

‐Dr. Emily Jones – tribal perspectives 
Reasons for change

‐product value relative to resources p

‐Geoarchaeology collaboration‐tribal involvement
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 168 (Thursday, September 2, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 49318]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-18993]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID: 0648-XB389]


Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC); Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The MAFMC's Spiny Dogfish Monitoring Committee will meet via 
webinar to develop recommendations for Spiny Dogfish specifications.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Monday, September 20, 2021, from 
1:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held via webinar. Details on the 
proposed agenda, connection information, and briefing materials will be 
posted via the MAFMC website calendar at: https://www.mafmc.org/council-events.
    Council address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N 
State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 674-2331; 
www.mafmc.org.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D., Executive 
Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, telephone: (302) 
526-5255.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Spiny Dogfish Monitoring Committee will 
meet to review annual specifications and management measures and make 
any appropriate recommendations for future Spiny Dogfish 
specifications.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aid should 
be directed to Shelley Spedden at (302) 526-5251, at least 5 days prior 
to any meeting date.
    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: August 30, 2021.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-18993 Filed 9-1-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
EXHIBIT
32


CERTIFICATION





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), each
of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Imperial
Capital Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) that the Company’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements included in
such report.











Date:
      July 30, 2008
            /s/ George W. HaligowskiGeorge
      W. HaligowskiChairman
      of the Board, President andChief
      Executive Officer





Date:
      July 30, 2008
            /s/ Timothy M. DoyleTimothy
      M. DoyleExecutive
      Managing Director andChief
      Financial Officer
#### Sonia Rosario et al., Respondents, et al., Plaintiffs, v Diagonal Realty, LLC, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Submitted April 30, 2007;

decided May 3, 2007

Motion by New York City Council et al. for leave to file a brief amici curiae on the appeal herein granted. Three copies of the brief may be served and an original and 24 copies filed within seven days.
(6 App. Div. 378)

#### BANK OF METROPOLIS v. LISSNER.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 5, 1896.)

1. Pleading—Supplemental—Leave to Make—Discretionary with Court.

It is discretionary with the court to grant or to refuse an application for leave to file a supplemental pleading, though Code Civ. Proc. § 544, provides that “upon the application of either party the court may, and, in a proper case, must, upon such terms as are just, permit him to make a supplemental complaint, answer or reply, alleging material facts which occurred after his former pleading, or of which he was ignorant when it was made.”

2. Same—Supplemental Answer—When Denied.

Where the matter sought to be pleaded by supplemental answer would, if admissible, have the same effect, when proved as evidence, as it would if pleaded, and proved after the pleading had been served, leave to serve will be denied.

Appeal from special term, New York county.

Action by the Bank of the Metropolis against Jacob L, Lissner. From an order granting defendant leave to serve a supplemental answer, plaintiff appeals. Reversed.

Argued before VAN BRUNT, P. J., and BARRETT, BTJMSEY, and O’BRIEN, JJ.

Geo. Putnam Smith, for appellant.

D. Leventritt, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

In spite of the mandatory language of section 544 of the Code of Civil Procedure,1 it is nevertheless within the discretion of the court to grant applications of this kind or to refuse them (Fleischmann v. Bennett, 79 N. Y. 579), and they will be refused whenever it appears that an injustice would be worked by allowing a supplemental answer to be served (Holyoke v. Adams, 59 N. Y. 237). It is quite clear in this case, we think, that it would be unjust so far to decide the question of the admissibility of this evidence as might even inferentially be done by permitting the supplemental answer to be served. No injustice can be done to the defendant by denying this motion, because, if the adjudication in the former action is admissible in this case, it will have the same effect,' when proved as evidence, as it would if pleaded and proved after the pleading had been served. Krekeler v. Ritter, 62 N. Y. 372.

The order is reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with $10 costs.

1

**Code Civ. Proc. § 544, provides, among other things, that “upon the application of either party the court may, and, in a proper case, must, upon such terms as are just, permit him to make a supplemental complaint, answer or reply, alleging material facts which occurred after his former pleading, or of which he was ignorant when it was made.”
# C_2005251EN.01000802.xml

| 11.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 251/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 251/8

---

Notification by the Republic of Lithuania concerning visa reciprocity (1)

1

(2005/C 251/12)

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Lithuania presents its compliments to the Council of the European Union and to the European Commission and has the honour to notify that having regard to Article 2 of Council Regulation (EC) No 851/2005 from 2 June 2005 amending Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement as regards the reciprocity mechanism, the citizens of the Republic of Lithuania are subject to a visa requirement when entering the following countries, listed in Annex II of Regulation (EC) No 539/2001:

| 1. | Australia; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Australia;

| 2. | Brunei; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Brunei;

| 3. | Canada; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Canada;

| 4. | United States of America; |
| --- | --- |

4.

United States of America;

| 5. | Brazil (The Republic of Lithuania has signed the bilateral agreement on the waiver of visa requirement with Brazil, which did not come into force (Diplomatic Note of the Republic of Lithuania No 4005/2003 from 19 August 2093) — no official notification from Brazil). |
| --- | --- |

5.

Brazil (The Republic of Lithuania has signed the bilateral agreement on the waiver of visa requirement with Brazil, which did not come into force (Diplomatic Note of the Republic of Lithuania No 4005/2003 from 19 August 2093) — no official notification from Brazil).

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Lithuania avails itself of this opportunity to renew to the Council of the European Union and to the European Commission the assurance of its highest consideration.

---

(1)  This notification is published in conformity with Article 2 of Council Regulation (EC) No 851/2005 of 2 June 2005 (OJ L 141, 4.6.2005, p. 3) amending Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 of 15 March 2001 (OJ L 81, 21.3.2001, p. 1).

1

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-47355 and 333-93401 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-10149,
333-10153, 333-10157, 333-11037, 333-13187, 333-56607, 333-67619, 333-71113,
and 333-80775 on Form S-8 of The Dial Corporation of our report dated
January 25, 2000, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
The Dial Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1999.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Phoenix, Arizona

March 29, 2000