alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
                  The schedule contains  summary financial information extracted
                  from the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements
                  and  is  qualified  in  its  entirety  by  reference  to  such
                  financial statements.

</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Sep-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  Oct-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    Jun-30-1999
<CASH>                            5,510,677
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                    24,326,343
<ALLOWANCES>                       (260,352)
<INVENTORY>                         578,881
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 37,806,899
<PP&E>                           80,511,544
<DEPRECIATION>                  (21,556,466)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   97,091,374
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            26,175,483
<BONDS>                           5,329,444
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                             62,865
<OTHER-SE>                       56,366,739
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     97,091,374
<SALES>                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                155,862,817
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   159,267,622
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                1,012,779
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (4,417,584)
<INCOME-TAX>                     (1,669,847)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (2,747,737)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                     (2,747,737)
<EPS-BASIC>                         (0.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (0.45)



</TABLE>
Page 1- NOTICE OF APPEAL

Ruben L. Iñiguez

Assistant Federal Public Defender

101 SW Main Street, Suite 1700

Portland, Oregon 97204

Tel: (503) 326-2123

Fax: (503) 326-5524

Email: ruben_iniguez@fd.org

Attorney for Defendant

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff,

v.

WINSTON SHROUT,

Defendant.

Case No. 3:15-cr-00438-JO-1

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Notice is hereby given that the defendant, Winston Shrout, appeals to the United States 

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit from the Judgment entered on October 22, 2018, by Senior 

U.S. District Judge Robert E. Jones [ECF 161], including, but not limited to, the conviction, 

sentence, pretrial motions, and bail determinations.

Respectfully submitted on October 26, 2018.

/s/ Ruben L. Iñiguez

Ruben L. Iñiguez

Assistant Federal Public Defender

Case 3:15-cr-00438-JO Document 163 Filed 10/26/18 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit
      32








SECTION
      1350 CERTIFICATION





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the quarterly report of PacificHealth Laboratories, Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the
      United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), Robert Portman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Stephen
      P. Kuchen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that based on our knowledge:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





This
      Certification shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for the purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





DATE:
      August 8, 2007






By: /s/
      Robert
      Portman


Robert
      Portman, Chairman of the Board


(Principal
      Executive Officer)





DATE:
      August 8, 2007







By: /s/ Stephen
        P. Kuchen


Stephen
      P. Kuchen, Chief Financial Officer


(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-18981, 333-18983, 333-18985,
333-18987, 333-18989, 333-29153, 333-63493, 333-36646, 333-46126 and 333-67710 all on Form S-8 of
SRS Labs, Inc., of our report dated February 13, 2004, appearing in SRS Labs, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 2003.

BDO
SEIDMAN, LLP

Costa
Mesa, California

March
29, 2004

---

QuickLinks
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
                                 SRS LABS, INC.
                                  SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                   Jurisdiction of
          Name                      Incorporation                      Ownership
          ----                     ---------------                     ---------
<S>                              <C>                          <C>

ValenceTech Limited              Bermuda                      SRS Labs, Inc. - 100% Direct

Valence Technology Limited       Hong Kong                    ValenceTech Limited - 100% Direct
 ("Valence - H.K.")

SRSWOWcast.com, Inc.             Delaware                     SRS Labs, Inc. - 87% Direct

Valence Semiconductor Design     Hong Kong                    Valence H.K. - 100% Direct
 Limited

ASP Microelectronics Limited     Hong Kong                    Valence H.K. - 100% Direct
 ("ASP")

LEC Electronic Components        Hong Kong                    Valence H.K. - 100% Direct
 Limited ("LEC")

VSD Electronics Limited          Hong Kong                    Valence H.K. - 100% Direct

LEC Microelectronics Limited     Hong Kong                    ASP - 100% Direct

LEC Electronics Limited          Hong Kong                    LEC - 100% Direct

VSD Electronics (Hui Yang)       Peoples Republic of China    LEC - 100% Direct
 Ltd.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
                        CONSENT OF KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
 
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Sybron International Corporation:
 
     We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 33-54434, 33-54436, 33-74112, 33-80098, 33-94822 and 333-47015) on Form
S-8 and the registration statements (No. 33-68690 and 333-31967) on Form S-3,
and the registration statement (No. 333-47795) on Form S-4, as amended by
Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 thereto on Form S-3, of Sybron International
Corporation (formerly Sybron Corporation) of our reports dated November 16, 1998
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Sybron International Corporation
and subsidiaries as of September 30, 1997 and 1998, and the related consolidated
statements of income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows and related financial
statement schedule for each of the years in the three-year period ended
September 30, 1998, which reports appear in the September 30, 1998, Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Sybron International Corporation.
 
                                                           KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
 
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
December 11, 1998
 
                                      EI-7
EXHIBIT
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Majestic Star Casino, LLC,
The Majestic Star Casino Capital Corp., and Majestic Star Casino Capital Corp.
II (collectively, the “Registrant”) for the year ended December 31, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), we, Don H. Barden, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Registrant, and Jon S. Bennett, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.





Dated: April
10, 2008





/s/ Don H.
Barden


Don H.
Barden


President
and Chief Executive Officer


The
Majestic Star Casino, LLC


The
Majestic Star Casino Capital Corp.


Majestic
Star Casino Capital Corp. II





/s/ Jon S.
Bennett


Jon S.
Bennett


Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


The
Majestic Star Casino, LLC


The
Majestic Star Casino Capital Corp.


Majestic
Star Casino Capital Corp. II
EXHIBIT 32.1



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Caremark Rx, Inc. (the Corporation) for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation,
certifies that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: May 10, 2005



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ E. Mac Crawford    
|E. Mac Crawford        
|Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-592

In Re: JOHN J. BUCKSHAW,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-96-30-3-MC)

Submitted: January 14, 1997 Decided: January 24, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John J. Buckshaw, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

John J. Buckshaw filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking an order compelling the district court to conduct an evidentiary hearing and an injunction. We deny the petition.

Mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used only in extraordinary

circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402

(1976). Mandamus relief is only available when there are no other

means by which the relief sought could be granted, In re Beard, 811

F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987), and may not be used as a substitute

for appeal. In re United Steelworkers, 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir.

1979). The party seeking mandamus relief carries the heavy burden

of showing that he has "no other adequate means to attain the relief he desires" and that his right to such relief is "clear and

indisputable." Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc., 449 U.S. 33, 35

(1980). Buckshaw has not made such a showing. Accordingly, we deny

his petition for a writ of mandamus. Buckshaw is granted leave to

proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

PETITION DENIED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INTERIM
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND BALANCE SHEETS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q COMMUNICATIONS & POWER
INDUSTRIES, INC. FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001000564
<NAME> COMMUNICATIONS & POWER INDUSTRIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           4,090
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,117
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     60,332
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               111,562
<PP&E>                                          72,646
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 224,937
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           87,975
<BONDS>                                        115,374
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           26,181
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (4,594)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   224,937
<SALES>                                        115,330
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               115,330
<CGS>                                           89,878
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   89,878
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,109
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,227
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,875)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       401
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,276)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,276)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Subsidiaries:


     Intelligroup New Zealand Limited, a corporation formed pursuant to the laws
of New Zealand and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Intelligroup, Inc.

     Intelligroup  Europe Limited,  a corporation formed pursuant to the laws of
the United Kingdom and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Intelligroup, Inc.

          CPI Resources, a corporation formed pursuant to the laws of the United
          Kingdom and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Intelligroup Europe Limited.

          CPI Consulting  Limited,  a corporation formed pursuant to the laws of
          the United  Kingdom  and 70% owned by CPI  Resources  and 30% owned by
          Intelligroup Europe Limited.

     Intelligroup  Singapore Private Ltd., a corporation  formed pursuant to the
laws of  Singapore  and 50% owned by each of  Intelligroup,  Inc.,  and Rajkumar
Koneru,  Chief Executive Officer,  President of U.S.  Operations and Director of
Intelligroup, Inc.

     Intelligroup  Nordic  A/S, a  corporation  formed  pursuant  to the laws of
Denmark and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Intelligroup, Inc.

     Intelligroup  Australia Pty Limited,  a corporation  formed pursuant to the
laws of Australia and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Intelligroup, Inc.

     Intelligroup Asia Private,  Ltd., a corporation formed pursuant to the laws
of India, and 99.8% owned and wholly-controlled subsidiary of Intelligroup, Inc.

     Azimuth  Consulting  Limited,  a corporation formed pursuant to the laws of
New Zealand and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Intelligroup, Inc.

          Azimuth Consulting Philippines, Inc., a corporation formed pursuant to
          the laws of the Philippines  and a wholly-owned  subsidiary of Azimuth
          Consulting Limited.

     Azimuth Holdings Limited,  a corporation formed pursuant to the laws of New
Zealand and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Intelligroup, Inc.

          Azimuth  Holdings Pty Limited,  a corporation  formed  pursuant to the
          laws of Australia and a  wholly-owned  subsidiary of Azimuth  Holdings
          Limited.

          Azimuth  Consulting   Australia  Pty  Limited,  a  corporation  formed
          pursuant to the laws of Australia  and a  wholly-owned  subsidiary  of
          Azimuth Holdings Limited.


<PAGE>

     Braithwaite  Richmond Limited, a corporation formed pursuant to the laws of
New Zealand and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Intelligroup, Inc.

     Azimuth Corporation Limited, a corporation formed pursuant to the laws
of New Zealand and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Intelligroup, Inc.

          New Zealand  Public  Information  Management  Limited,  a  corporation
          formed  pursuant  to  the  laws  of  New  Zealand  and a  wholly-owned
          subsidiary of Azimuth Corporation Limited.

     Network Publishing,  Inc., a Utah corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary
of Intelligroup, Inc.

     Empower,  Inc., a Michigan  corporation  and a  wholly-owned  subsidiary of
Intelligroup, Inc.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



To Intelligroup, Inc.:

        As   independent   public   accountants,   we  hereby   consent  to  the
incorporation  by reference of our report  included in this Form 10-K,  into the
Company's   previously  filed  Registration   Statement  File  Nos.   333-11486,
333-31809, 333-56143, 333-67583, 333-73051, 333-94285 and 333-70244.


                                            ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Roseland, New Jersey
March 27, 2002
# EUR-Lex - 32009M5713 - EN

*|*

# 32009M5713

**Commission Decision of 11/12/2009 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No COMP/M.5713 - ALTOR / PHARMACY COMPANY SWEDEN 1 AB and PHARMACY COMPANY SWEDEN 8 AB) according to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*
Official Journal 0305 , 16/12/2009 P. 0006 - 0006 *

|EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels , 11.12.2009

SG-Greffe(2009) D/11137

C(2009) 10247

PUBLIC VERSION

MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

To the notifying party:

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M.5713 – ALTOR/ PHARMACY COMPANY SWEDEN 1 AB and PHARMACY COMPANY SWEDEN 8 AB. Notification of 13/11/2009 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 280, 20/11/2009, p. 32

1. On 13/11/2009, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 by which Altor Fund III GP Limited (as General Partner of Altor Fund III (No. 1) Limited Partnership, Altor Fund III (No. 2) Limited Partnership and as investment manager to Altor Fund III (No. 3) Limited, Channel Islands) acquires, within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation, by way of purchase of shares, sole control of Pharmacy Company Sweden 1 AB and Pharmacy Company Sweden 8 AB (Sweden).

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- Altor Fund III is a private equity investment fund.

- Pharmacy Company Sweden 1 AB and Pharmacy Company 8 AB are two clusters of pharmacies and pharmacy shops located in Sweden.

3. After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 and of paragraph 5(c) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [2] .

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004.

For the Commission (signed) Philip LOWE Director General

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

[2] OJ C 56, 05.3.2005, p. 32.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-13-00216- CV

In re Com bin ed Law Enf orce m ent Associations of T exas and Joh n Bu rpo

ORI GINAL P ROCEEDI NG F ROM TRAVIS CO UNTY

M E M O R AN D U M O P I N I O N
Relator s f il e d a p e ti ti on for writ of mandamus and an interlocutory appea l challeng ing the trial court’s denial of their motions to dismiss under the Texas Citi z en s P ar t icipation Act (TCPA). See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 27.001-.011. Relators’ mandamus petition rec og nized the split of authori t y among the appellate courts about whether the TCPA permits interlocutory appea ls and observe d that this Court had not determined the issue.

Howeve r, in Kinney v. BGB Attorney Search, Inc. , No. 03-12-00579- CV, 2013 Tex. App. L EXI S 10481, at *10-13 (Tex. App.—Austin Aug
. 21, 2013, no pet. h.) (mem. o p.), we not ed the rec ent leg islative amendment clar ify ing the availability of an interlocutory appea l from the denial of a motion to dismiss under the TCPA and deter mined that the amendment applies retroa ctively to interlocutory appea ls, like the on e R el at o rs broug ht here , filed befor e the amendment’ s eff

ective da te. Be cause Relators have an adequate reme d y by appea l, their petition for writ of mandamus is de nied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a)
. Relators’ interlocutory appea l, Combined LawEnforceme nt Associat io n s o f Te x a s a n d J o h n B urpo v. Mike Sheffield , No. 03-13-00105- CV, rema ins pending
.

__________________________________________ J eff Rose, J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Rose and Goodw in Filed: Aug ust 29, 2013

2
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-11-00575-CR

Robert Charles HUTCHINSON,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010CR7214

Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 19, 2011

DISMISSED

The trial court signed a certification of defendant’s right to appeal stating that this “is a 

plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). 

Rule 25.2(d) provides, “The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant 

has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” TEX. R. APP. P.

25.2(d). Accordingly, on August 24, 2011, this court issued an order stating this appeal would 

be dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification that shows 
04-11-00575-CR

- 2 -

defendant has the right of appeal was made part of the appellate record. See Daniels v. State,

110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order); TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1. 

On September 16, 2011, defendant’s appellate counsel filed a letter stating “this court has 

no choice but to dismiss the appeal.” In light of the record presented, we agree with defendant’s 

counsel that Rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss this appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is 

dismissed.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH