alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009223EN.01001201.xml

| 16.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/12

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5585 — Centrica/Venture Production)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 223/05

On 21 August 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5585. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5585. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
               (in thousands except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               Pro forma        Pro forma
Year ended April 30,                         April 30, 1996   April 30, 1997
<S>                                           <C>              <C>
Income from continuing operations ........    $  1,423          $ 5,428

Income from discontinued operations ......         327              374

Gain on sale of discontinued operations
   (net of income tax of $372) ...........          --            1,100
                                               -------          -------
   Net Income ............................     $ 1,750          $ 6,902
                                               =======          =======

Primary:

Average shares outstanding ...............       9,864           21,184

Net effect of dilutive stock options
   based on the treasury method ..........         729              783

Net effect of dilutive convertible 
   preferred stock based on the "as
   converted" method* ....................      14,630            6,096
                                               -------           ------
   Total .................................      25,223           28,063
                                               =======           ======

Per share amounts:

Income from continuing operations ........     $  0.06          $  0.19

Income from discontinued operations ......        0.01             0.01

Gain on sale of discontinued operations ..          --             0.04
                                               -------          -------
   Net Income ............................     $  0.07          $  0.25
                                               =======          =======
</TABLE>
* Pro forma amounts assume conversion of convertible preferred stock to common 
  stock from the beginning of the reporting period until the date of the 
  initial public offering upon which such shares were officially converted.  
  Pro forma accounts also assume the effect of the three-for-one stock split,
  which occurred in July, 1996, for the entire reporting period.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Pest Management Research: Sidney, MT
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    NPARL
                        Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory
                                    Agricultural Systems Research Unit
                                    Grasshoppers: Their Biology, Identification and ManagementSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Sidney, Montana Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory Pest Management Research PMRU Docs Grasshoppers: Their Biology, Identification and Management: Outbreak and Survey Info Forecast Maps





- NPARL Home
- PMRU Home
- ASRU Home
- Site Highlights
- Outbreak and Survey Info
- ID Tools | Apps
- Grasshopper Management
- IPM Handbook
- USDA Research | Contact Info

Outbreak Info: Grasshopper Forecast 2001headline bar /ARSUserFiles/30320505/grasshopper/Extras/images/Maps/hazard01.jpg < Previous Map    Back to Outbreak Info      Next Map >


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBAENES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of American Commerce Solutions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended August 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the
undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to such officers knowledge: Section 13(a)



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of Section 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934: and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and
for the periods expressed in the Report.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below
by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.



|                       |  |       |  |                                                                    |  |                 
|---------------------- |  | ----- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ----------------
|Signatures             |  | Title |  | Date                                                              
|                       |  |       | 
|/s/ Robert E. Maxwell  |  |       |  | Chairman of the Board & Director                                   |  | October 20, 2009
|Robert E. Maxwell      |  |       |  |                                                                    | 
|                       |  |       | 
|/s/ Daniel L. Hefner   |  |       |  | Chief Executive Officer, President & Director                      |  | October 20, 2009
|Daniel L. Hefner       |  |       |  |                                                                    | 
|                       |  |       | 
|/s/ Frank D. Puissegur |  |       |  | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) and Director |  | October 20, 2009
|Frank D. Puissegur     |  |       |  |                                                                    |
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 11, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-13-00579-CV

ALEX NGUYEN, Appellant

V.

VETERANS AUTO REPAIR CENTER, Appellee

On Appeal from County Civil Court at Law No. 3

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1025761

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed June 24, 2013. The clerk’s record 

was filed July 23, 2013. No reporter’s record was filed. 

On December 9, 2013, appellant filed a brief that was not in compliance 

with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(a), (b), (c), 

(d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i), (j) and (k). On January 23, 2014, we ordered appellant's 

brief filed December 9, 2013, stricken. Appellant was ordered to file a brief that 
2

complied with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure within ten (10) days. See 

Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i), (j) and (k). 

Appellant was informed that if he filed another brief that did not comply 

with Rule 38, the Court may strike the brief, prohibit appellant from filing another, 

and proceed as if appellant had failed to file a brief. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.9(a). 

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a), where an appellant has 

failed to file a brief, we may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 

Appellant filed no response. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices McCally, Busby, and Donovan.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 22-40053

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Darrell Lenard Bates, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:20-CR-58-1

Before Smith, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Darrell Lenard Bates filed an interlocutory appeal from the magistrate 

judge’s denial of his pro se motion to quash an indictment charging him with 

failing to register as a sex offender. Counsel moved to withdraw, and Bates 

moved for the appointment of substitute counsel. 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 13, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-40053 Document: 00516354798 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/13/2022
No. 22-40053

2

It is the duty of this court to raise jurisdictional issues sua sponte, if 

necessary. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). As an initial 

matter, Bates’s pro se motion to quash was denied as moot by the magistrate 

judge. In expanding the duties of magistrate judges under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), 

“Congress made clear that . . . the magistrate [judge] acts subsidiary to and 

only in aid of the district court. Thereafter, the entire process takes place 

under the district court’s total control and jurisdiction.” United States v. 

Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667, 681 (1980). Thus, we neither monitor nor supervise 

the work of magistrate judges to whom cases are referred under § 636(b). If 

Bates is dissatisfied with the magistrate judge’s ruling on his motion to quash 

the indictment, he should direct his complaints to the district court judge, in 

this case, Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle. 

Additionally, the denial of a motion to quash an indictment prior to 

entry of final judgment is typically not an order over which a court of appeals 

would have jurisdiction; as a general rule, we lack jurisdiction over an 

interlocutory motion such as this. See Abney v. United States, 431 U.S. 651, 

663 (1977); United States v. Miller, 952 F.2d 866, 874 (5th Cir. 1992). The 

appeal is therefore dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. 

APPEAL DISMISSED; motions to withdraw and to appoint 

substitute counsel DENIED as moot. 

Case: 22-40053 Document: 00516354798 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/13/2022
CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's best knowledge and belief, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
Geodyne Energy Income Limited Partnership II-E ("Issuer") for the period ending
December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 25th day of March, 2003.

                                   GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                   PARTNERSHIP II-E
                                   ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)
#### In the Matter of HAROLD FORGANG, an attorney at law.

Por the order: *Mr. Frederick 0. Vonhof.*

Por the respondent: *Mr. Sam Weiss.*

December 30, 1960.

Respondent suspended until the further order of the court.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 171 (Wednesday, September 8, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50384-50385]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-18938]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: September 9 and 10, 2021, at 9:00 a.m.

PLACE: Potomac, MD.

[[Page 50385]]


STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Thursday, September 9, 2021, and Friday, September 10, 2021, at 9:00 
a.m.

    1. Strategic Items.
    2. Financial and Operational Matters.
    3. Administrative Items.

General Counsel Certification: The General Counsel of the United States 
Postal Service has certified that the meeting may be closed under the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Michael J. Elston, Secretary of 
the Board of Governors, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza SW, 
Washington, DC 20260-1000. Telephone: (202) 268-4800.

Michael J. Elston,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-18938 Filed 9-3-21; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### FROMME et al., appellants, v. JARECKY, Respondent.

(City Court of New York, General Term.

December 12, 1896.)

Action by Herman Fromme and another against Herman .Tarecky. Fromme Bros., for appellants. J. C. De La Blere, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The order appealed from affirmed, with costs.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

PORTLAND DIVISION 

LA WREN CE P. CIUFFITELLI, for himself and Case No. 3:16-cv-00580-AC 

as Trustee of CIUFFITELLI REVOCABLE 

TRUST; GREG and ANGELA JULIEN; 

JAMES and SUSAN MACDONALD, as CoTrustees of the MACDONALD FAMILY 

TRUST; R.F. MACDONALD CO.; ANDREW 

NOWAK, for himself and as Trustee of the 

ANDREW NOW AK REVOCABLE LIVING 

TRUST U/A 2/20/2002; and WILLIAM 

RAMSTEIN, individually and on behalf of all 

others similarly situated, 

[PR8J?8filfiR] ORDER ENTERING 

STIPULATION 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP; EISNERAMPER 

LLP; SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP, and TONKON 

TORPLLP, 

Defendants. 

This matter came before this coutt on the parties' Joint Motion for Entry of Stipulation 

Concerning Deadlines for Filing Notices of Appearance and Pleadings and Scheduling Rule 

26(f) Conference ("Stipulation"), attached hereto. 

PAGE 1- [AA€H!QS~DJ ORDER ENTERING STIPULATION 

STOLL STOLL BERNE LOKTlNG & SHLACHTER P.C. 

209 S.W.OAKSTREET 

PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 

TEL. (503) 227-HiOO FAX (503) 227·6840 

Case 3:16-cv-00580-AC Document 47 Filed 04/27/16 Page 1 of 2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. Each Defendant in the above-captioned matter has filed a Notice of Appearance 

with this court. 

2. Each Defendant will respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint by June 10, 2016, or within 

14 days of the filing of any amended complaint, whichever is later. Defendants may seek 

additional time, beyond 14 days, to respond to Plaintiffs' amended complaint, if doing so is 

reasonably necessary as a result of Plaintiffs' amended allegations. 

3. If Plaintiffs do not file an amended complaint, the Rule 26(f) conference for this 

matter will take place no later than July 1, 2016. If an amended complaint is filed, Defendants 

will participate in a Rule 26(f) conference no later than July 1, 2016, or within 21 days of the 

filing of the amended complaint, whichever is later. Defendants may seek additional time, 

beyond 21 days, if doing so is reasonably necessary as a result of Plaintiffs' amended allegations. 

Defendants reserve all rights and objections available at the time of the Rule 26(f) conference. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Hon. J<:j'/11 v. Acosta 

PAGE 2 - [PR.Q:PO£ED] ORDER ENTERING STIPULATION 

STOLL STOLL BERNE LOKTING & SHLACHTER P.C. 

209 S.W. OAK STREET 

PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 

TEL. (503) 227-1600 FAX (503) 227--6840 

Case 3:16-cv-00580-AC Document 47 Filed 04/27/16 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 RULE 13-A-14 OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1934
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 I, Kanwar J.S. Chadha, Ph. D., certify that:
 
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Entrada Networks, Inc.;
 
 2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 
 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this quarterly report;
 
 4.  The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
  (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c)   disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 (5) The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date:  September 14, 2004
 
 /s/ Kanwar Chadha ,
 Kanwar J.S. Chadha, Ph. D.
 Chief Executive Officer