alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          54,938
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,435
<ALLOWANCES>                                       759
<INVENTORY>                                      7,320
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                73,256
<PP&E>                                          13,697
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,322
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  81,780
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,119
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           247
<OTHER-SE>                                    (48,548)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    81,780
<SALES>                                         24,522
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,522
<CGS>                                            8,226
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,226
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,518
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (568)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,654)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,319)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,973)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,973)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.16)


</TABLE>
# C_2009246EN.01000601.xml

| 14.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5530 — Glaxo Smith Kline/Stiefel Laboratories)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 246/04

On 17 July 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5530. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5530. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Document

JOINDER AGREEMENT


This JOINDER AGREEMENT, dated as of April 22, 2020 (this “Joinder”), is delivered in connection with the Payroll Support Program Agreement, dated as of April 22, 2020 (as amended from time to time, the “PSP Agreement”) between Alaska Airlines, Inc., an Alaska corporation, and the United States Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”). All capitalized terms not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the PSP Agreement.


1.Joinder as a Recipient. The undersigned hereby (a) agrees that it shall be deemed a Recipient under the PSP Agreement, (b) agrees to perform all of the obligations of a Recipient thereunder, and (c) agrees to comply with the terms thereof applicable to Recipients as if it were a signatory thereto.


2.Unconditional Joinder. The undersigned acknowledges that its obligations under this Joinder are unconditional.


3.Reliance. The undersigned hereby acknowledges that Treasury executed the PSP Agreement in reliance on this Joinder and may reduce the amount of Payroll Support thereunder if the undersigned does not comply with the terms of the PSP Agreement.


4.Incorporation by Reference. All terms and conditions of the PSP Agreement are hereby incorporated by reference into this Joinder as if set forth in full.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed and delivered this Joinder as of the date first written above.


HORIZON AIR INDUSTRIES, INC.




By:  
Name: Title:
EXHIBIT 11

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                               LENOX BANCORP, INC.
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                  FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
                     (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
                                  (UNAUDITED)



<S>                                                                  <C>       
Net income applicable to common stock                                $ (53,000)
                                                                     =========

EARNINGS PER SHARE

Average number of shares of common stock outstanding

LESS:  Weighted average unearned ESOP shares                           425,677
                                                                       -------
                                                                     $ 391,623
                                                                     =========

Earnings per share                                                      $ (.12)
                                                                        ======



</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 26, 2010 

1018 

Order 

 

October 26, 2010 

141164 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141164 

 COA: 296710 

Ingham CC: 04-001022-FC 

RICKO LARON LOTT, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 6, 2010 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to 

meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

 DAVIS, J., not participating. I recuse myself and am not participating because I 

was on the Court of Appeals panel in this case. See MCR 2.003(B).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         August 25, 2021.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on August 10, 2021, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 719 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2021-125, CP2021-129.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2021-18316 Filed 8-24-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued our report dated March 31, 2009, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of Digital Lightwave, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration
Statements of Digital Lightwave, Inc., on Form S-8 (File No. 333-99683, effective September 17, 2002) and on Form S-3 (File No. 333-116531, effective July, 2004).



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ GRANT THORNTON, LLP
|                       
|Tampa, Florida         
|March 31, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2032 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2032

To designate the Federal building in Juneau, Alaska, as the ``Hurff A. 
                      Saunders Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 5, 1998

 Mr. Murkowski introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the Federal building in Juneau, Alaska, as the ``Hurff A. 
                      Saunders Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF HURFF A. SAUNDERS FEDERAL BUILDING.

    The Federal building in Juneau, Alaska, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Hurff A. Saunders Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Hurff A. Saunders 
Federal Building''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000825851
<NAME> WELLESLEY LEASE INCOME LIMITED PARTNERSHIP IV FDS 12/31/96
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          36,022
<SECURITIES>                                       600
<RECEIVABLES>                                  134,605
<ALLOWANCES>                                    62,863
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               108,364
<PP&E>                                       5,084,339
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,807,667
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,385,036
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          202,030
<BONDS>                                        591,174
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       12,149,459
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (11,557,627)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,385,036
<SALES>                                      1,617,165
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,650,739
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  123,488
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               957,914
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                23,068
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              82,349
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                463,920
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            463,920
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   463,920
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    12.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 21

INDUSTRI-MATEMATIK INTERNATIONAL CORP.

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES AT APRIL 30, 2001

AUSTRALIA
Industri - Matematik Pty Ltd

CANADA
Industri - Matematik of Canada Inc.

FRANCE
Industri - Matematik France SARL

GERMANY
Industri - Matematik GmbH

THE NETHERLANDS
Industri - Matematik Nederland B.V.

SWEDEN
Abalon AB

UNITED KINGDOM (1)
Enterprise Management System Limited (England and Wales)
Industri - Matematik Limited (England and Wales)

UNITED STATES (1)
Industri - Matematik American Operations, Inc. (Delaware)
Industri - Matematik Corp. (Delaware)
I - M Licensing Corp. (Delaware)
I - M North American Operations, Inc. (Delaware)
Software Finance Corp. (Delaware)

-----------
(1) Country or state of incorporation is indicated in parentheses.
#### WALSMANN v. TAMSEN.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 14, 1896.)

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
EXHIBIT 32(A )
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Murray United Development Corp.
on Form 10-KSB for the period ending July 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Dwight Foster, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


         1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Date:  October 25, 2004                       / s /  Dwight Foster
                                            ----------------------

                                            DWIGHT FOSTER,
                                            Chief Executive Officer
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

John Tyler Runnels

, * From the 3 2nd District Court

of Fisher County

Trial Court No. 3508

.

Vs. No. 11

- 1 7

- 00 0 37

- CR * February 21 , 201 9

The Sta te of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, C.J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C. J.,

Stretcher, J. , and Wright, S.C.J., sitting

by assignment )

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
1 - ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

SHUA TILAHUN, No. 6:16-cv-00070-AC

Plaintiff, ORDER

v. 

 

MICHAEL F. GOWER, et al.,

 Defendants.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge John Acosta issued a Findings and Recommendation on May 3, 2021, 

in which he recommends that this Court deny Plaintiff’s motions for summary judgment and

grant Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. F&R, ECF 169. The matter is now before the 

Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings & Recommendation. 

Pl. Obj., ECF 171. When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge’s Findings & 

Case 6:16-cv-00070-AC Document 176 Filed 07/28/21 Page 1 of 2
2 - ORDER

Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the 

Magistrate Judge’s report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th 

Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).

The Court has carefully considered Plaintiff’s objections and concludes that there is no 

basis to modify the Findings & Recommendation. The Court has also reviewed the pertinent 

portions of the record de novo and finds no error in the Magistrate Judge’s Findings & 

Recommendation. 

CONCLUSION 

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta’s Findings and Recommendation [169].

Therefore, Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [101]1 is DENIED and Defendant’s

Motion for Summary Judgment [142] is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: _______________________.

 ___________________________

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ

United States District Judge

1 Plaintiff filed thirty separate motions for partial summary judgment. The Court previously 

construed the motions as a single motion for summary judgment. Order, ECF 138. The Court’s 

reference in this Order to Plaintiff’s “Motion for Summary Judgment” refers collectively to each 

of Plaintiff’s motions for partial summary judgment.

July 28, 2021

Case 6:16-cv-00070-AC Document 176 Filed 07/28/21 Page 2 of 2
SCORE REPOR

“The State of Natural & Cultural 

the Colorado River Ecosy

• Table II-7• M

O

’

s & I

N

’

s

•

GCMRC’s goals & objectives 

re:SCORE
Do We Need a SCORE 

If yes, can it be more useful 

has been in the past? Timeli

Content?
GCMRC SCORE G

•

Provide information regarding k

resources based on core monitorselected research activities

•

Resource areas determined by II

MO’s and IN’s

•

Provide to TWG for review at w

meeting 

•

Provide to AMWG at summer m
Present SCORE (20

•

Incomplete-lacks physical & cul

resource information (errors assu

•

Draft to invite input and clarifica

purposes and content

• Compare w/previous SCOREs•

Revise for August or Fall TWG
From: "Dennis B Fenn" <denny_fenn@usgs.gov> 

To: <lwhetton@uc.usbr.gov> 

Date: 12/20/02 1:53PM 

Subject: Matt Koplinski's Question in this Morning's TWG Conference Call 

Dear Linda: 

Could you please forward this message on to the TWG for me? It is the answer to Matt Koplinski's 

question this morning regarding what GCMRC was not going to do in FY 03-04 as a consequence of 

moving $95k out of our annual operating budget for fine sediment transport work and into the 

experimental flow budget. I have consulted with Ted Melis on this issue and he has refreshed my 

memory of this matter. 

The $95k in question was to purchase improved, near real-time sediment monitoring stations for the 

Paria River and other important spots on the Colorado River within the study area. This effort was 

moved to the experimental flows budget and the equipment has been purchased and installed under that 

effort. The network is up and operating at this time. 

Hence, nothing was lost by this cut in the FY 03 GCMRC regular operating budget. It was simply a 

bookkeeping decision to purchase this equipment under experimental flows but it will also serve the 

regular monitoring and research program of GCMRC. 

I hope that this information helps. I am sorry that I could not remember this answer when Matt asked the 

question this morning. 

Happy Holidays to one and all. 

Cheers, 

Denny Fenn 

Chief, GCMRC 

From: Linda Whetton 

To: Begay, Robert M.; Benemelis, Perri; Christensen, Kerry; Cook, Wayne; 

Crocker-Bedford, Cole; Damp, Jonathan; Davis, William E.; Dongoske, Kurt; Drye, Brenda; Foster, 

Dave; Greiner, Lloyd; Harris, Christopher; Henderson, Norm; Hornewer, Nancy; Hyde, Pamela; 

James , Leslie; Kaplinski, Matt; King, Robert; Lehr, Phillip; Metz, Don; Palmer, S. Clayton; Persons, 

Bill; Peterson, Randy; Ramsey, Nikolai; Seaholm, Randolph; Shields, John; Yeatts, Michael 

Date: 12/23/02 8:57AM 

Subject: Fwd: Matt Koplinski's Question in this Morning's TWG Conference Call 

CC: Burton, Gary; Jackson, Loretta; Jan Balsom
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Fort Collins, Colorado
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Research Programs and Projects at this LocationARS research is organized into National Programs. Within each National Program are research projects. Listed below are  the National Programs and research projects currently conducted at this location.
Clicking on a National Program (NP) will take you  to the main ARS site for more information on the program. Clicking on a research  project title will take you to more information on the project.  Current View: All Projects   Show All Projects ||
         Appropriated Projects Only


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov