alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Glen Canyon Releases - WY 2000

Based on January 2000 Mid-Month Forecast

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

Oct-99

Nov-99

Dec-99

Jan-00

Feb-00

Mar-00

Apr-00

May-00

Jun-00

Jul-00

Aug-00Sep-00

Cubic Feet per Second

Minimum Probable

Maximum Probable

Most Probable
Merrill Schneider, OSB #77336

merrillschneider@schneiderlaw.com

Schneider Kerr & Robichaux

PO Box 14490

Portland, Oregon 97293

Phone: 503-255-9092

Fax: 503-255-9145

Attorney for Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

ANGELIA NANCY HOBAN,

 Plaintiff,

v. 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

 Defendant.

3:15-cv-01786-HZ

ORDER FOR ATTORNEY 

FEES UNDER 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)

The court finds and orders an attorney fee of $8,795.25 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). 

Such funds shall be paid to Schneider, Kerr & Robichaux, PO Box 14490, Portland, OR 97293. 

The attorney fee of $6,362.31 allowed pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act will be refunded 

to Plaintiff upon counsel’s receipt of the allowed 406(b) fee awarded.

Dated this _______ day of ____________________, 2020.

________________________________

Marco A. Hernandez

United States District Court Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                       5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0001000686
<NAME>                          North American Resorts, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                               1
<CURRENCY>                                        US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                   JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                     JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                            1
<CASH>                                                     0
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              0
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      132340
<PP&E>                                                     0
<DEPRECIATION>                                             0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        868191
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 684930
<BONDS>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                          1484728
<COMMON>                                               66172
<OTHER-SE>                                          (1367639)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          868191
<SALES>                                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           0
<CGS>                                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           1133
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (1133)
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       (133094)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (134227)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0



</TABLE>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Manhattan, Kansas (NBAF)
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home People & Locations







Madison  Beauchamp
                        Biologics Development Module

                        




                        
                        SCIENTIST
                        Phone: (316) 559-4288
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

Written Statement of Chief Executive
Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of
LCC International, Inc. (the Company), hereby
certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (a) | the Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal
    year ended December 31, 2002, filed on the date hereof with the
    Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report)
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|
| | (b) | information contained in the Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                

A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to LCC
International, Inc. and will be retained by LCC International,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.



| |                            
| | ---------------------------
| | /s/ C. THOMAS FAULDERS, III
| |                            
| | C. Thomas Faulders, III    
| | Chief Executive Officer    
| | March 28, 2003
Riparian Restoration on 

Riparian Restoration on 

Colorado River Colorado River
Ongoing Restoration Proje

Colorado River

Total Acreage of Projects to Be Restored/P

• Yuma East Wetlands (1400 acres)• Yuma West Wetlands (60 Acres)• Ahakhav Tribal Preserve (1200 Acre• Bullhead City Reach (50-200 Acres)• Lees Ferry (10 Acres)• Other Various Projects on Reservat

and Refuges

• Multi Species Conservation Plan (8

Acres Total Plan)
The Yuma East Wetlands The Yuma East Wetlands










Ahakhav Tribal Preserve





Restored Habitat

Restored Habitat



Comparison of Avian Density

0

20406080

100120

Gambel's Quail

Greater Roadrunner

Black-tailed Gnatcatcher Abert's Towhee Northern Flicker House Finch Bewick's Wren Ruby-crowned Kinglet Orange-crowned Warbler White-crowned Sparrow Common Ground Dove Gila Woodpecker Cactus Wren Northern Mockingbird Blue Grosbeak Northern Harrier Red-tailed Hawk Great horned Owl Cliff Swallow Common Yellowt

Green-ta

Selected species

Density from surveys

Saltcedar III Density n/100 acres Saltcedar IV Density n/100 acres Revegetated Are
Restoration 

• To Date over approximately 1000 a

Native Cottonwood/Willow Forest Restored on Lower Colorado River

• Over 100% Increase in Amount of 

Cottonwood/Willow Habitat Since the Lower Colorado River

(Anderson, Birds of the Lower Colorado River)
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

MICH AE L MCCUTCHEON , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 1 188

[ August 12, 2021 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Martin S. Fein , Judge; L.T. Case No. 95

- 21915CF 10A

.

Dane K. Chase of Chase Law Florida, P.A., Saint Petersburg, for appellant

.
No appearance required for appellee

.

P ER C URIAM

.
Aff irmed.

C ONNER , C.J., G ROSS and G ERBER , JJ., concur

.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
FIRST AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                            AGREEMENT OF PARTNERSHIP
                     PW/GEODYNE PRODUCTION PARTNERSHIP II-E

       The Agreement of Partnership of PW/Geodyne  Production  Partnership  II-E
dated September 27, 1988 (the "Agreement") is hereby amended as follows:

       A.  The first  sentence of Section 2.1 is hereby  deleted and  replaced
by the following provision:

       "The  Production  Partnership  shall be conducted  under the name Geodyne
Production Partnership II-E."

       B.  All   references  in  the  Agreement  to   "PW/Geodyne   Production
Partnership II-E" are hereby changed to "Geodyne Production Partnership II-E."

       C.  The third  sentence of Section 2.1 is hereby  deleted and  replaced
by the following provision:

       "The office and principal place of business of the Production Partnership
shall be c/o  Geodyne  Production  Company,  Two West  Second,  Tulsa,  Oklahoma
74103."

       D.  The  name of the  "General  Partner"  and the  "Limited  Partnership"
reflected  in Article  One has been  changed  from  "PaineWebber/Geodyne  Energy
Income Limited  Partnership II-E" to "Geodyne Energy Income Limited  Partnership
II-E". All references in the Agreement to the name of the "General  Partner" and
the "Limited  Partnership" are hereby changed to reflect this name change.  This
change reflects a name change only and not a change of entity.

       In all other respects the Agreement is hereby ratified and affirmed.

 DATED:    February 26, 1993
                                         Managing Partner:

                                         Geodyne Production Company

                                         /s/ Michael E. Luttrell
                                         ----------------------------------
                                         Michael E. Luttrell
                                         Executive Vice President


                                      -1-
<PAGE>



                                         General Partner:

                                         Geodyne Energy Income Limited
                                         Partnership II-E

                                         By:  Geodyne Properties, Inc.,
                                              General Partner


                                         By: /s/Michael E. Luttrell
                                            ------------------------------
                                              Michael E. Luttrell,
                                              Executive Vice President




                                      -2-
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                  STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS
                                TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                  -------------------------------------------------------------
                                                    1998         1999         2000         2001         2002
                                                  ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------
<S>                                               <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
Earnings:
  Pre-tax income from continuing operations ..    $  50,989    $  79,080    $  73,089    $  34,382    $  88,713
  Fixed charges ..............................       26,338       94,277      127,575      118,743       99,324
  Less: Preferred stock dividends ............       (3,234)      (4,144)      (4,144)      (4,144)      (4,144)
  Less: Capitalized interest .................         (262)          --           --           --           --
     Net fixed charges .......................       22,842       90,133      123,431      114,599       95,180
                                                  ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------
EARNINGS .....................................    $  73,831    $ 169,213    $ 196,520    $ 148,981    $ 183,893
                                                  =========    =========    =========    =========    =========

FIXED CHARGES:
  Interest expense ...........................    $  20,267    $  81,046    $ 111,929    $ 100,514    $  83,908
  Preferred stock dividends ..................        3,234        4,144        4,144        4,144        4,144
  Capitalized interest .......................          262           --           --           --           --
  Amortization of debt costs .................          865        4,930        6,254        6,689        5,255
  Interest factor of rental expense ..........        1,710        4,157        5,248        7,396        6,017
                                                  ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------
  TOTAL FIXED CHARGES ........................    $  26,338    $  94,277    $ 127,575    $ 118,743    $  99,324
                                                  =========    =========    =========    =========    =========
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES ...........          2.8          1.8          1.5          1.3          1.9
                                                  =========    =========    =========    =========    =========

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                          19
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   285
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     954
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,428
<PP&E>                          17,215
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  24,494
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           6,744
<BONDS>                         4,961
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        61
<OTHER-SE>                      10,773
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    24,494
<SALES>                         361
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                361
<CGS>                           227
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                2,956
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (2,386)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (2,386)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (2,386)
<EPS-BASIC>                   (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (.05)



</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




Written
      Statement of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Traffix, Inc.
      ("Registrant"), hereby certifies that the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form
      10-Q for the three months ended February 28, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operations of the Registrant.






/s/
      Daniel Harvey


DANIEL
      HARVEY


Chief
      Financial Officer
#### BUELL et al., Respondents v. SEARLE et al., Appellants (three cases). VAN CAMP v. SAME.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October, 1896.)

Three actions by George C. Buell and others against Edward P. Searle, late sheriff of Orleans county. The Orleans County National Bank, John Sawyer, and Keeler & Salisbury were made parties to the motion by the order herein, and are appellants. Also an action by Joseph Van Camp against Edward P. Searle and others.

PER' CURIAM.

It appearing that the order of the special term, held March 30, 1896, and subsequent orders, denying motion for a rehearing, were heard upon a remittitur, and a judgment entered thereon, which do not express the judgment of the court of appeals, the remittitur having been subsequently amended by that court in June, 1896 (44 N. E. 1129), it is deemed proper that the aforesaid orders should be vacated without costs to either party, and that the order in the case of Yan Gamp against Searle should be reversed, without prejudice to the moving party to apply to the supreme court to make the judgment of the court of appeals, as expressed in its amended remittitur, the judgment of the supreme court, and without prejudice to any application the Orleans County National Bank and John G. Sawyer may make for further relief. It is not necessary to determine whether the application for an order distributing the fund should be in the action in which Yan Camp is plaintiff, or in the action in which Buell is plaintiff.
# L_2009177EN.01000301.xml

| 8.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 177/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 177/3

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 7 July 2009

appointing one UK member of the European Economic and Social Committee

(2009/525/EC, Euratom)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 259 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 167 thereof,

Having regard to Decision 2006/651/EC, Euratom (1),

Having regard to the proposal of the Government of the United Kingdom,

Having regard to the opinion of the Commission,

Whereas one member’s seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the resignation of Ms Marge CAREY,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Ms Dörthe WEIMANN, GROUP II (Employees) is hereby appointed as a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 20 September 2010.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 7 July 2009.

For the Council

The President

A. BORG

---

(1)  
  OJ L 269, 28.9.2006, p. 13.

1

---
#### Flynn *v.*Woolsey.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.*

July, 1890.)

Payment—Checks.

Defendant being indebted to plaintiff sent Ms check to the latter expressing in terms on its face that it was “in full. ” The check was for less than the debt, and was neither presented nor returned until tendered back at the trial. Defendant suffered no loss by reason of plaintiff’s failure to present the check. *Held,*that this was not a payment in full or *pro tanto.*

Appeal from judgment on report of referee.

Action by Peter T. Flynn against Edward J. Woolsey. The complaint was one to recover for work, labor, and services. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

Argued before Barnard, P. J., and Dykman and Pratt, JJ.

*8. B. & D. Noble,*for appellant. *Benner & Benner,*for respondent.

Barnard, P. J.

The plaintiff is an expressman, and as such was employed by the defendant to carry and deliver various articles between the dates of June 20, 1885, and January 13, 1888. On January 8, 1888, the defendant sent his check to the plaintiff for $48.75, and expressing in terms on its face that it was in full to January 1,1887. In fact it was not in full, but was some $12 less than the debt at that date. The check was never either presented or returned until it was tendered back on the trial. This was not a payment in full, or a payment at all. There are cases where the non-presentation of a check occasions a loss of its amount. The neglect to present will be sufficient to charge the holder with the amount of the check. Ho damage is proven in this case by the failure to present the check. *Bradford*v. *Fox,*38 N. Y. 289. On the contrary, it appears that the check was never presented and paid, and that the defendant has voluntarily withdrawn the account from the bank where the check was payable. The services charged include no item for cash paid out, but there were small sums paid out in and about the employment, and really as part of the carrying. The expressman had to buy the goods ordered, and pay for the same, and the bill of particulars is made out for carting, and cash paid out. The complaint, in the absence of objection, was sufficient to admit the proof, and, the proof once in, the amount of the cash paid was justly called for in the judgment. The judgment should therefore be affirmed, with costs. All concur.