alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
audited consolidated financial statements of the Company for the year
ended October 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                               NOV-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                 OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                       170,288
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                264,675
<ALLOWANCES>                                 9,000
<INVENTORY>                                  25,753
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             504,178
<PP&E>                                       1,752,101
<DEPRECIATION>                               565,072
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,177,431
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,387,837
<BONDS>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                     382
<OTHER-SE>                                   (210,788)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,177,431
<SALES>                                      1,888,225
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,917,444
<CGS>                                        745,711
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                745,711
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           52,063
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (739,620)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          0
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (739,620)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

ITRONICS INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Itronics Inc. (the Company") on Form10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on May 24, 2005 (the "Report") each of the undersigned, in thecapacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date: May 23, 2005                          /S/ JOHN W. WHITNEY
                                            John W. Whitney

                                            Chief Executive Officer

                                            Chief Financial Officer

81
#### CONNOLLY v. MANHATTAN RY. CO. et al. DE BALAINE v. SAME.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 29, 1896.)

Appeal—Stay During Pendency.

Under Const. 1895, art. 6, § 9, providing that no unanimous decision of the appellate division of the supreme court that there is evidence supporting the finding of fact or a verdict not directed by the court shall be reviewed by the court of appeals, a stay will not be granted pending an appeal to the court of appeals from a judgment which has been unanimously affirmed by the appellate division.

Motions are made in each of these cases for an order staying the operation of the injunction contained in the judgments therein pending an appeal to the court of appeals, and extending the time of the defendants to make the tenders and payments provided for by said judgments until such time as may be reasonable after the decision of the appeal which the defendants have taken to the court of appeals. The granting of such motions would be a matter of course, in ordinary cases. But in these cáses it appears that each of the judgments after modification as to damages, "was unanimously affirmed by the appellate division; and, inasmuch as the new constitution (article 0, § 9) provides that no unanimous decision of the appellate division of the supreme court that there is evidence supporting or tending to sustain the finding of fact on a verdict not directed by the court shall be reviewed by the court of appeals, there is no necessity for a stay, because, upon the face of the papers, the appeal must be fruitless. Motions denied, with costs.

Appeal from special term, New York county.

Actions by Ellen M. B. Connolly against the Manhattan Railway Company and the Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company, and by Mary A. Durup De Balaine against the same defendants. From an order denying a motion by defendants for a stay-in each case pending an appeal to the court of appeals, defendants appeal. Affirmed.

The opinion of Mr. Justice LAWRENCE at special term is as follows:

Argued before VAN BRUNT, P. J., and BARRETT, PATTERSON, and INGRAHAM, JJ.

J. T. Davies, for appellants.

H. A. Forster, for respondent Connolly.

PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, in each case, on opinion of Mr. Justice LAWRENCE at special term.
AO 442 (Rev. 01/09) Arrest Warrant OR\G\NAL 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

To: 

United States of America 

v. 

CORWIN MICHAEL BOBB 

Defendant 

Any authorized law enforcement officer 

for the 

District of Oregon JAN 27 '16 1 :30PM 

U.S. lfARSHALS SERVICE 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 3:16-cr-00036-MO 

ARREST WARRANT .. ....... cri 

....... 

J:::,. 

..:.:;.. 

•..D 

:55 

YOU ARE COMMANDED to arrest and bring before a United States magistrate judge without unnecessary delay : 

(name of person to be arrested) CORWIN MICHAEL BOBB ;1 

who is accused of an offense or violation based on the following document filed with the court: 

ff Indictment 0 Superseding Indictment 0 Information 0 Superseding Information 0 Complaint 

0 Probation Violation Petition 0 Supervised Release Violation Petition 0 Violation Notice 0 Order of the Court 

This offense is briefly described as follows: 

Fleeing or Attempting to Elude a Police Officer 

Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants 

Date: 01127/2016 

City and State: --~P~o~rt=l=a=n=d~, O~R~--

Return 

This warrant was received on (date) , and the person was arrested on (date) 

at (city and state) 

-------

Date: --------

Arresting officer's signature 

Printed name and title 

Case 3:16-cr-00036-MO Document 10 Filed 02/03/16 Page 1 of 1
Katherine Eitenmiller, OSB # 145731

Mark A. Manning, OSB # 00311 

HARDER, WELLS, BARON & MANNING, P.C. 

474 Willamette Street 

Eugene, OR 97401 

(541) 686-1969 

keitenmiller@hwbm.net 

Of Attorneys for the Plaintiff 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

CRAIG F. HARDIN, ) 

) Case No. 6:15-cv-02111-SI

Plaintiff, ) 

vs. ) 

) ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY 

COMMISSIONER, ) FEES PURSUANT TO EAJA 

Social Security Administration , ) 

) 

) 

____________Defendant._________)

Based upon the Stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that attorney fees in the 

amount of $4,847.60 are hereby awarded to Plaintiff, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act 

(EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Payment of this award shall be paid via check made payable to 

Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff’s attorneys at Harder, Wells, Baron & Manning, P.C., 474 

Willamette Street, Eugene, Oregon 97401. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, the award shall be made 

payable to Plaintiff’s attorney if the commissioner confirms that Plaintiff owes no debt to the 

government through the federal treasury offset program. There are no costs or expenses to be 

paid herein. 

Dated this day of January 2017. 

______________________________

U.S. District Judge/Magistrate 

PRESENTED BY: 

s/ Katherine Eitenmiller 

Harder, Wells, Baron & Manning, P.C. 

Of Attorneys for Plaintiff

10th

/s/ Michael H. Simon

Case 6:15-cv-02111-SI Document 22 Filed 01/10/17 Page 1 of 1
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

RICHARD DANIEL FALCON, JR.
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 507

[ January 25, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit,

Indian River County ; Cynthia L. Cox , Judge; L.T. Case No.

312016CF000101A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Patrick B. Burke, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rachael Kaiman,

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

W ARNER
, M AY and D AMOORGIAN

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Document

              May 4, 2020


Multi Solutions II, Inc.
4400 Biscayne Boulevard; 10th Floor
Miami, FL 33137


Re: Amendment No. 8 to Revolving Credit Promissory Note


Reference is made to the Revolving Credit Promissory Note (the “Revolver”) dated April 23, 2012 in consideration of the mutual agreements and covenants contained and other good and valuable consideration, the parties hereto agree to extend the Maturity Date of the Revolver to December 31, 2021 from December 31, 2020.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment No. 8 to the Revolving Credit Promissory Note to be duly executed and attested, all as of the date first written above.


BORROWER:


MULTI SOLUTIONS II, INC., a Florida Corporation




By:   /s/ Robert M. Lundgren 
        Name: Robert M. Lundgren
         Director


LENDER:


VECTOR GROUP LTD., a Delaware Corporation




By:   /s/ Marc N. Bell  
        Name: Marc N. Bell
         Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          10,309
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  182,961
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,105
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               217,762
<PP&E>                                          49,748
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 852,619
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          124,261
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           343
<OTHER-SE>                                     448,333
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   852,619
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               428,558
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  253,828
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               130,128
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,016
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 28,804
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,097
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,707
<DISCONTINUED>                                  22,204
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    38,911
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.49


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George Lowry WEEKS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-30459.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 16, 2007 *.

Filed April 19, 2007.

Ed Zink, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Billings, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

John S. Forsythe, Forsythe Law Office, Forsyth, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

George Lowry Weeks appeals from the 40-month sentence imposed after his guilty-plea conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Weeks contends that the district court erred by failing to sentence him below the Sentencing Guidelines range because it failed to consider mitigating factors outlined in U.S.S.G. §§ 5K2.0 and 5K2.1, such as his assistance to police and the cultural components of gun ownership in Montana. Additionally, Weeks contends that the district court failed to discuss the reasonableness of his 40-month sentence.

Weeks’s contentions are without merit. The factors Weeks points to should now, after *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), be considered during the § 3553(a) analysis. *See United States v. Zolp,*479 F.3d 715, 722 (9th Cir.2007). The district court properly considered the advisory Sentencing Guidelines and the § 3553(a) factors in imposing the sentence. *See United States v. Plouffe,*445 F.3d 1126, 1131 (9th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 2314, 164 L.Ed.2d 832 (2006). Accordingly, we conclude that Weeks’s sentence was reasonable. *See id.*

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-10091

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MARCOS ROBLEDO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:15-CR-194-3

Before KING, DENNIS, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Marcos Robledo has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Robledo has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief 

and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 1, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-10091 Document: 00513742070 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/01/2016
No. 16-10091

2

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-10091 Document: 00513742070 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/01/2016
i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 No. 04-08-00161-CV

Annette S. MUECKE,

Appellant

v.

Jay KHADEM,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 335619

Honorable Irene Rios, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 18, 2009

AFFIRMED

This is an appeal from a forcible detainer proceeding in which possession of the property was

awarded to appellee Jay Khadem. Appellant Annette Muecke raises eleven issues on appeal. We

affirm.
04-08-00161-CV

-2-

DISCUSSION

The sole issue in a forcible detainer action is which party has the right to immediate

possession of the property. Dormady v. Dinero Land & Cattle Co., L.C., 61 S.W.3d 555, 557 (Tex.

App.—San Antonio 2001, pet. dism’d w.o.j.). Here, it is undisputed that no lease agreement exists

between the parties. The trial court heard testimony from Ms. Muecke that Mr. Khadem’s former

wife allowed her “in for a few days until Mr. Khadem, or Jay, returned and I was to call him and he

would tell me ‘yes’ or ‘no’ if I could stay. He said I could stay.” Mr. Khadem testified he originally

rented the house at issue in this dispute for his own use, then bought the house, later deeded it to his

father, and, ultimately, his father gave it back to him. At the time Mr. Khadem’s former wife

allowed Ms. Muecke to use the house, the house was empty. Ms. Muecke challenged Mr. Khadem’s

ownership of the property on the grounds that he had no proof his father ever deeded the property

back to him. However, in a forcible detainer action, the plaintiff is not required to prove title;

Dormady, 61 S.W.3d at 557; because, “the merits of the title shall not be adjudicated.” TEX.R.CIV.

P. 746. Mr. Khadem was required only to present sufficient evidence of ownership to demonstrate

his superior right to immediate possession. Dormady, 61 S.W.3d at 557. On this record, we

conclude Mr. Khadem demonstrated a superior right to immediate possession of the property. 

On appeal, Ms. Muecke makes several arguments, among which is that she established a

superior right based on her adverse possession of the property. However, Ms. Muecke did not raise

this argument before the trial court, nor was any evidence submitted at the hearing to support this

contention. We need not reach Ms. Muecke’s other issues on appeal because the issue of whether

Mr. Khadem demonstrated a superior right to immediate possession of the property is dispositive.
04-08-00161-CV

-3-

CONCLUSION

We overrule Ms. Muecke’s issues on appeal and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
[Cite as Lake Cty. Bar Assn. v. Mismas, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2015-Ohio-327.]

L AKE C OUNTY B AR A SSOCIATION v . M ISMAS . [Cite as Lake Cty. Bar Assn. v. Mismas, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2015-Ohio-327.]

(No. 2013-1248

— Submitted January 23, 2015

— Decided January 30, 2015.)
O N A PPLICATION FOR R EINSTATEMENT

.

____________________ {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by res pondent, John Daniel Mismas, Attorney Registration No. 0077434, last known address in Willoughby, Ohio. {¶ 2} The court coming now to consid er its order of June 12, 2014, wherein the court, pursuant to former Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of one year with six months stayed on conditions, finds that respondent has substantially complied w ith that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24)(C). {¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this cour t that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2).
O’C ONNOR , C.J., and P FEIFER , O’D ONNELL , L ANZINGER , K ENNEDY , F RENCH , and O’N EILL , JJ., concur.

________________________
Technical Work Group

Phoenix, Arizona

March 14, 2001

Committee Members Present:

Robert Begay, Navajo Nation

Perri Benemelis, ADWR

Kerry Christensen, Hualapai Tribe

Dave Cohen, Trout Unlimited

Wayne Cook, UCRC

Jonathan Damp, Pueblo of Zuni

William Davis, CREDA

Kurt Dongoske, The Hopi Tribe

Brenda Drye, So. Paiute Consortium

Norm Henderson, GLCA

Committee Members Absent:

Cliff Barrett, UAMPS

Christopher Harris, CRBC 

Amy Heuslein, BIA

Robert King, UDWR

Alternates Present:

Gary Burton

Wayne Cook

Other Interested Persons:

Paul Barrett, USFWS

Tom Czapla, USFWS

Joe Falbo, Attorney (IEDA)

Barry Gold, GCMRC

Loretta Jackson, Hualapai Tribe

Dennis Kubly, USBR

Lisa Leap, NPS

Recorder: Linda Whetton, USBR

Nancy Hornewer, USGS

Pamela Hyde, Southwest Rivers

Matt Kaplinski, GCRG

Phillip S. Lehr, Colo. River Comm./NV

Don Metz, USFWS

Bill Persons, AGFD

Randall Peterson, USBR

Nikolai Ramsey, GCT

Robert Winfree, GRCA

S. Clayton Palmer, WAPA

D. Randolph Seaholm, CWCB

John Shields, WY State Engineers Office

For:

S. Clayton Palmer, WAPA

John Shields, WY State Engineers Office

Mike Liszewski, GCMRC

Henry Maddux, USFWS

Ted Melis, GCMRC

Mary Orton, The Mary Orton Company

Jennifer Pitt, Environmental Defense

Tom Ryan, USBR

Michael Yeatts, The Hopi Tribe
Technical Work Group

Phoenix, Arizona

March 15, 2001

Committee Members Present:

Robert Begay, Navajo Nation

Perri Benemelis, ADWR

Kerry Christensen, Hualapai Tribe

Dave Cohen, Trout Unlimited

Wayne Cook, UCRC

Jonathan Damp, Pueblo of Zuni

William Davis, CREDA

Kurt Dongoske, The Hopi Tribe

Brenda Drye, So. Paiute Consortium

Norm Henderson, GLCA

Committee Members Absent:

Cliff Barrett, UAMPS

Christopher Harris, CRBC 

Amy Heuslein, BIA

Robert King, UDWR

Alternates Present:

Gary Burton

Wayne Cook

Other Interested Persons:

Paul Barrett, USFWS

Joe Falbo, Attorney (IEDA)

Barry Gold, GCMRC

Loretta Jackson, Hualapai Tribe

Dennis Kubly, USBR

Lisa Leap, NPS

Nancy Hornewer, USGS

Pamela Hyde, Southwest Rivers

Phillip S. Lehr, Colo. River Comm./NV

Don Metz, USFWS

Bill Persons, AGFD

Randall Peterson, USBR

Nikolai Ramsey, GCT

Robert Winfree, GRCA

S. Clayton Palmer, WAPA

D. Randolph Seaholm, CWCB

John Shields, WY State Engineers Office

For:

S. Clayton Palmer, WAPA

John Shields, WY State Engineers Office

Mike Liszewski, GCMRC

Jennifer Pitt, Environmental Defense

Tom Ryan, USBR
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Colmena Corp. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period  ending  June 30,  2002 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Adam C.  Wasserman,
Chief Financial Officer and Controller of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a)
               or  15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934;  and (2) The
               information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  result  of
               operations of the Company.


/s/ Adam C. Wasserman

Adam C. Wasserman
Chief Financial Officer and Controller
August 14, 2002