alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB (the "Report") of PYR
Energy Corporation (the "Company") for the year ended August 31, 2004, D. Scott
Singdahlsen, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
the undersigned's knowledge and belief: (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  December 2, 2004                           /s/ D. Scott Singdahlsen
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  D. Scott Singdahlsen
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

       EXHIBIT 11.1 STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER
                                    SHARE


                                              Quarter Ended September 30,
                                              ---------------------------

                                             1997                     1996
                                             ----                     ----

Net income (loss)                        $(1,977,364)               $373,106

Primary weighted average 
common shares outstanding                  9,467,877               9,427,811
 
Primary earnings per share                     ($.21)                   $.04

Fully diluted weighted average 
common shares outstanding                  9,467,877               9,427,811
 
Fully diluted earnings per share               ($.21)                   $.04
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                             PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert C. Bateman, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Applied Microsystems
Corporation;

2.       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.       The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         (a)      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         (b)      Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c)      Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and

5.       The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors:

         (a)      All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

         (b)      Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 19, 2003

/s/ Robert C. Bateman
------------------------------
Robert C. Bateman
Chief Financial Officer
# C_2009286EN.01000101.xml

| 27.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 286/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 286/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5631 — Symboled/Zumtobel/Ledon Oled JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 286/01

On 20 November 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5631. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5631. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Transmeta Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Matthew R. Perry,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company for the periods presented therein.


/s/ Matthew R. Perry


Matthew R. Perry
Chief Executive Officer
August 9, 2002
ACCEPTED12-15-00105-CVTWELFTH COURT OF APPEALSTYLER, TEXAS9/30/2015 11:16:34 AMPam EstesCLERK
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

AMMON BUNDY, RYAN BUNDY, 

SHAWNA COX, DAVID LEE FRY, 

JEFF WAYNE BANTA, KENNETH 

MEDENBACH, and NEIL WAMPLER, 

Defendants. 

BROWN, Judge. 

3:16-cr-00051-BR 

ORDER SEALING EX PARTE 

MATERIALS 

Pursuant to the Court's Order (#1453), issued October 18, 

2016, the Court SEALS the enclosed Confidential Human Source 

reports and the Ex Parte Declaration of Geoffrey A. Barrow which 

were submitted to the Court for its in camera review in order to 

adjudicate Defendant Ammon Bundy's Motion (#1423) to Compel 

Information Regarding the Government's Use of Informants. The 

Court directs the government to maintain these records as sealed 

until further order of this Court or the Ninth Circuit Court of 

Appeals. 

1 - ORDER SEALING EX PARTE MATERIALS 

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 1459 Filed 10/18/16 Page 1 of 2
The Court directs the Clerk to file a copy of this Order in 

the record of this case and to affix the original of this Order 

to the sealed envelope. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this 18th day of October, 2016. 

ANN~ United States District Judge 

2 - ORDER SEALING EX PARTE MATERIALS 

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 1459 Filed 10/18/16 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

AMY NGUYEN, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE 

CORPORATION, a/kla FREDDIE MAC; 

NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC; 

CYPREXX SERVICES LLC, 

Defendants. 

MOSMAN,J., 

No. 3:16-cv-00316-AC 

OPINION AND ORDER 

On November 21, 2019, Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta issued his Findings and 

Recommendation ("F&R") [ECF 96], recommending that I grant Defendants' Motion for 

Summary Judgment [ECF 65] and that I deny Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 

[ECF 70]. No objections were filed. 

LEGAL STANDARD 

The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may 

file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge, 

but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to 

make a de novo determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or 

1 - OPINION AND ORDER 
recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(C). However, the court 

is not required to review, de novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of 

the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See 

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 

(9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F&R 

depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject, 

or modify any part of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(C). 

CONCLUSION 

Upon review of the F &R, I agree with Judge Acosta's reasoning and conclusions. 

Therefore, I ADOPT the F&R [96] as my own opinion. I GRANT Defendants' Motion for 

Summary Judgment [65] and I DENY Plaintiff Amy Nguyen's Motion for Partial Summary 

Judgment [70]. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this of December, 2019. 

2 - OPINION AND ORDER
Exhibit 99.3
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Colmena Corp. on Form 10-QSB for
the period ending  December 31, 2003 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof,  I, Anthony Q. Joffe,  Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Anthony Q. Joffe
Anthony Q. Joffe
President and Chief Executive Officer

February 20, 2004


<PAGE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 17, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-20399 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ALFREDO ALBARENGA-VILLALOBO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:03-CR-467-ALL

-------------------- Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Alfredo Albarenga-Villalobo (Albarenga) appeals from his sentence imposed on a guilty-plea conviction for illegal re-entry. The district court imposed a 58-month term of imprisonment, followed by a three-year term of supervised release. For the first time on appeal, Albarenga contends that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)No. 04-20399 -2- are unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). As Albarenga concedes, this issue is foreclosed.
See Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 247 (1998); United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). Albarenga further argues that the Supreme Court’s holding in Blakely v. Washington , 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), should be applied to sentences determined under the United States Sentencing Guidelines. As Albarenga also concedes, this argument is foreclosed by our opinion in United States v. Pineiro , 377 F.3d 464, 465-66 (5th Cir. 2004), petition for cert. filed (U.S. July 14, 2004) (No. 04-5263), but he raises it to preserve it for possible further review. Accordingly, the sentence of the district court is AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.2

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Caremark Rx, Inc. (the Corporation) for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certifies that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 9, 2006                              
|                                                    
|/s/ Peter J. Clemens IV                             
|Peter J. Clemens IV                                 
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 20, 2022

No. 04-21-00300-CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF VAN L. CRAPPS, DECEASED

From the County Court at Law, Medina County, Texas

Trial Court No. 9498

Honorable Mark Cashion, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On August 24, 2022, we ordered Appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be 

dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Accordingly, we withdrew the February 2, 2022 submission 

date, and we advised the parties we would reset this appeal for submission at a later date.

Appellant timely filed a response, which we have considered.

We set this cause for formal submission ON BRIEFS ONLY on October 12, 2022, before 

a panel consisting of Justice Patricia O. Álvarez, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, and Justice Lori I.

Valenzuela. 

It is so ORDERED September 20, 2022.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

 CLERK OF COURT
Technical Work Group Meeting

DRAFT AGENDA

Glen Canyon Dam

Adaptive Management Program

Technical Work Group Meeting

Arizona Department of Water Resources

500 N. Third Street

Phoenix, Arizona

November 8, 2000

START

TIME TOPIC PERSON PURPOSE MATERIALS

9:30 a.m. Welcome and

Administrative

Rick Johnson 1. Introductions / Quorum

2. Review Action Items from Sept.

20-21, 2000 meeting

3. Approval of Sep. 20-21, 2000

Meeting Minutes

See tabs for --> 

Agenda

Draft Minutes

9:45 a.m. Updates Randy Peterson

Barry Gold

Randy Peterson

Cliff Barrett

Nancy Coulam

Christine Karas

Dennis Kubly

1. Congressional actions

2. Transfer of GCMRC to USGS 

3. Charter & AMWG membership

renewals

4. Status of Budget Ad Hoc

Group

5. Status of PA group response

to PEP Review

6. Status of KAWG response to

KAS Expert Panel Review

7. Process discussion (box and

arrow diagrams showing how

AMP processes work, including PEP/science updates)

Updates

10:45 a.m. B R E A K

11 a.m. Technical Issues Cliff Barrett

Clayton Palmer

Tom Ryan

1. Presentation on power

economics and repayment

2. Report on LSSF costs

(mW, actual costs, cost using 

average purchase costs)

3. Hydrologic conditions/ releases

Technical Issues

12 noon L U N C H

1 p.m. Technical Issues

(continued)

Ted Melis

Randy Peterson

Barry Gold

Barry Gold

4. Monitoring & Research - 

Discussion of Sedimentation 

summary paper

5. Ideas on task for Experimentation Flow Ad Hoc Group

6. Upcoming PEP review Panel

Schedule

7. Status of 2001 Science

Symposium

Technical Issues

2:30 p.m. 2002 AMP Budget Barry Gold

Randy Peterson

1. GCMRC Work Plans

- questions and concerns in 

response to GCMRC revised 

work plans

2. AMP administration, tribal

participation, and PA

2002 AMP Budget

4 p.m Wrap-up and Adjourn Rick Johnson
Technical Work Group Meeting

DRAFT AGENDA

Glen Canyon Dam

Adaptive Management Program

Technical Work Group Meeting

Arizona Department of Water Resources

500 N. Third Street

Phoenix, Arizona

November 9, 2000

START 

TIME TOPIC PERSON PURPOSE MATERIALS

8:00 a.m. Welcome and

Administrative

Rick Johnson Introductions

Determination of Quorum

Agenda

8:15 a.m. Management

Objectives

Mary Orton

Dennis Kubly

Jeff Cross

1. Status and Schedule

2. Feedback on AMWG/TWG

comments

3. Core questions relating to

MOs and resources (what is

unknown?)

Management

Objectives

11:45 a.m. Meeting Review Randy Peterson

12 noon Wrap-up and 

Adjourn

Rick Johnson
734 A.2d 1289

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant, v. James L. BEEMER, Appellee,

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Submitted Aug. 3, 1999.

Decided Sept. 9, 1999.

Stephen M. Van Natten, Asst. Dist. Atty., James B. Martin, Dist. Atty., District Attorney’s Office, for Com.

John J. Waldron, Allentown, for James L. Beemer.

Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN and SAYLOR, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Based upon our disposition in *Commonwealth v. Williams,*557 Pa. 285, 733 A.2d 593 (1999), we affirm the Order of the Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas dated December 8, 1997. Furthermore, we remand the matter to the common pleas court for disposition of any remaining issues.

Jurisdiction is relinquished.
#### ZIPP v. BARKER et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 23, 1896.)

Contracts—Building Restrictions—Change in Use op Property.

Where lots are conveyed subject to a covenant that no buildings shall-be erected thereon within 15 feet of the street, such covenant is enforceable, though the street on which the lot abuts has changed from a residence street to a business street.

That “the said parties of these presents, for themselves, respectively, and their respective heirs, executors, and administrators, * * * do hereby mutually agree to and with each other, and to and with the heirs and assigns of each other, respectively, that no dwelling house, storehouse, or other building or structure of any kind or description whatsoever, excepting fences, shall at any time or times hereinafter be erected in any lot or ground, * * * as the same, respectively, are laid down and designated on the aforesaid map, within the several distances hereinafter specified from the lines or sides of said places and streets, respectively; that is to say, with regard to De Bevoise Place, within 15 feet.”

Appeal from special term, Kings county.

Action by Rosa Zipp, as sole.surviving executrix, against Frances E. Banker and others, to enjoin defendants from maintaining any building on their premises within 15 feet of the street. The complaint alleged that á parcel of land formerly owned by Johannes Be Bevoise, of which defendants’ premises are a part, was partitioned by agreement between the heirs of said De Bevoise, and a "deed of partition was executed by them, to which was annexed a map showing the several lots into which the property was divided, and that the deed contained the following covenant:

From an order denying a motion for an injunction pendente lite, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

Argued before BROWN, P. J., and CULLEN, BARTLETT, and HATCH, JJ.

Charles J. Patterson, for appellant.

J. T. Marean, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

We are of opinion that, as the defendants’ structure was erected before the application for an injunction, the defendants should not be compelled to remove it till after a trial of the action; but, that there may be no mistake as to our view of the merits of the action, we will state that in our judgment the fact that the street has altered from a residential street to a *326business street is no ground for refusing to enforce the covenant. The effect of the covenant was practically to widen a 50-foot street into an 80-foot street. This may be as advantageous where the property fronting on the street is used for business purposes as where it is used for residences. Whether this be so or not, the parties covenanted for an 80-foot street, and persons claiming under that covenant are entitled to its benefits, unless a common course of action by the parties in interest shows that they have abandoned the maintenance of its conditions. This question should be left to the trial of the action, and not determined on affidavits.

The order appealed from should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, to abide the event of the action.
#### Louise G. Smith *v.*Delavan P. Smith

*John A. Gawrych,*in support of the motion.

*Matthew J. Forstadt,*in opposition.

Submitted May 15

decided June *3,*1975

The defendant’s motion in the appeal from the Superior Court in Litchfield County that no finding of facts be made by the trial court is denied.