alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-8141

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

MAURICE EDWARD JACKSON, a/k/a Moe,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. James P. Jones, District 

Judge. (5:93-cr-30025-JPJ-RSB-4; 5:12-cv-80538-JPJ-RSB)

Submitted: April 23, 2013 Decided: May 13, 2013

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Maurice Edward Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Grayson A. Hoffman, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Harrisonburg, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Maurice Edward Jackson seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order treating his Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(c) motion as a 

successive 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012) motion, and 

dismissing it on that basis. The order is not appealable unless 

a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of 

appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate 

of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or 

wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see MillerEl v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district 

court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Jackson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.

Additionally, in his informal brief, Jackson requests 

leave to file a second or successive § 2255 motion. In order to 
3

obtain authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion, a 

prisoner must assert claims based on either:

(1) newly discovered evidence that . . . would be 

sufficient to establish by clear and convincing 

evidence that no reasonable factfinder would have 

found the movant guilty of the offense; or

(2) a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive 

to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court, 

that was previously unavailable.

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(h) (West Supp. 2012). Jackson’s claims do 

not satisfy either of these criteria. Therefore, we deny 

authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
. 
.d 

. 

Tho 8aia Rouse Bill x0. .46 3.8 lalom sst.bs Toma 

Rice Developwmt &en and in brisk it. provfUeo for the leqy 

and oolleotlon.or .a tax ana the expenaiture ..thereof in the 

prcuaotlon or, snles and advort~sb~ or Tears rioo ana rioo 

pXVhIOt6 #U&d rOr rS802mh in' EIib t%?WiOpEiOnt ,Of nOW U808 ror 

rlao ana rioe produoto. The AOt lwc%viaes tar a rlae developQOILt OcDnaiSsiOn OOQOtU3a Or ri'oe prOOXIi3, t0 be QpPOintOd by 

#a Cond8sbncr..or Boara of AgFioultura with t&o advioo arrd 

oonsoat or tha licnate. &I Saotion 6 OS the Aot it ie proviae4 that the tax 8hell be remittea alraot to tho woe De- . 

_. VelOpIWlt 0CEXd58iOn. hur 4LLOl'Bp t0 ~Ul'firot QuBStioII, 

therefore :D that the Toxe8 Rloe DovuWpmont Owamlnn%oa %a 

authord to raaoloe l’nntln 8OarUlnS under the provla~o~ or 

the Aot. Xt is uotob howeyor that Seotlon ll 02 the Act exprossly praviat3i that such Texas Rloe Developmnt comlo8io~ 

ohall not oonotitute a separate or nor Stete agenoy but Is 

* a. part 61' tho Ds$nrtnant 02 A&aulture. 

Ae noted abova, the aolleotl& eve to be made .by 

tho.COmlsoionor or Agrlaulture thrOu& tho Rio0 DevelOpmmt 

Board. The Aot itee1.i ooat8lM no 0X9W88 prov%aloM as to 

the-mathoa o? hea4lintj the Monet after it hm 'bean oollootea. 

Ih Seotfon lo ft is provitled that: wl rUa8 ooneotod 

hareunder or horebyapproprfated to the Texan Rloo Developmmat coFsDinol.on for the purpose of oerr$ln~ out the provlSiOll5 Of thi8 Aat.” But tile us0 or SUOh lantpage a8 that l.a 

lGekiag em appropriation bee never been teIcen%o moen that the 

austodg- of the fund8 80 Bppr0pmti8a le. tadreby ohnagea rrm 

the State ~Txvaeurer to the Department 'to whioh the epp+prlatfOR 18 leadO+ The.~~noys a8n be depositad with the Btste 

Troaaurer ana ~614 out'upon w&manta drawn by the ccmptroller 

snd yet the appropriation be given ?rta Tull meeting. Kor 

ara there aqnather provlslane in the Aot whiola two neoeBSkW11y. inaon8istent with the bati* Of thO50 fUId8 in the 

SQUO mumor thot othor noneye aOlleotoa by the Stats aro 

he&lea in the abnenoe ot opooial prooi8ion8. Ye wm.54 nota 

in portfouler thht this Aot oontafne no prov~oion for the 

bonding ai the Texas Rise lkvolopwmt Coml8sIOa, or any ap-' 

pointeo theroof, 58 thd pornanant OUStOdllD or theSO' runas. 

Our amwar to your boooad, third and tOUZ%h QUMtlOM, thereroro, io (IA arrimativo one. . 

-. 

. 

. . 

- _. 

. 
. 

Dapcrrbwnt*r Agloultrire -Page 3 

. 

." ~ 

Al-t. i+335, 

It is not eboolutel$ naoosasry under tha etatuta, 

R8Vi883d civil %tetUtOS, iOr the head OS the dep5rtmant to 5Im ololrs ana ecoounta. It is nooessary that 

the 5GU8 ba aQned by tho.head Or the dopartiaont Or other 

parson roagonalble ror Incuxdng the ixpendlture. On this 

point t&e roquilwnent OS th8 COnptrolbr 8hOultl be 08aer.. 

talnad and oaxiplle6 with. 

AmRovm OCT 30;194l 

(sigiea) Groves 3eZlers 

IOUr8 very truly 

ATTORNEY tyNERAL OP TEZAS 

oBY 8. H. 8. 

.oxAIma' . 

‘.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          37,860
<SECURITIES>                                    30,908
<RECEIVABLES>                                   68,380
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,286
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               141,158
<PP&E>                                          14,721
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 168,684
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           70,258
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                      74,553
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   168,684
<SALES>                                         89,780
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               159,084
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,642
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               100,751
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,693
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,680
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,013
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,013
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .47


</TABLE>
Kathryn Tassinari, OSB # 80115 

Robert A. Baron, OSB # 89020 

HARDER, WELLS, BARON & MANNING,P.C. 

4 7 4 Willamette Street 

Eugene, OR 97401 

(541) 686-1969 

kathrynt50@comcast.net 

Of Attorneys for the Plaintiff 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

BRENDAL. HUDDLESTON, ) 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

COMMISSIONER, 

Social Security Administration , 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

~~~~~-=--o======~~~~ 

Defendant. ) 

Case No. 6:15-cv-01660-SB 

ORDERFORPAYMENTOFATTORNEY 

FEES PURSUANT TO EAJA 

Based upon the Stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that attorney fees in the 

amount of $4,972.86 are hereby awarded to Plaintiff, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act 

(EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Payment of this award shall be paid via check made payable to 

Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff's attorneys at Harder, Wells, Baron & Manning, P.C., 474 

Willamette Street, Eugene, Oregon 97401. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, the award shall be made 

payable to Plaintiff's attorney, Kathryn Tassinari, if the commissioner confirms that Plaintiff 

owes no debt to the government through the federal treasury offset program. There are no costs 

or expenses to be paid herein . .,,., 

Dated this "'-- day of May 2017. 

PRESENTED BY: 

s/ Kathryn Tassinari 

Harder, Wells, Baron & Manning, P.C. 

Of Attorneys for Plaintiff 

U.S. District Judge/Magistrate
# L_2009118EN.01001101.xml

| 13.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 118/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 118/11

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 384/2009

of 12 May 2009

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in particular Article 138(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 13 May 2009.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 May 2009.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.

2

---

ANNEX

Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

| (EUR/100 kg) |
| --- |
| CN code | Third country code (1) | Standard import value |
| 0702 00 00 | MA | 58,0 |
| TN | 115,0 |
| TR | 103,4 |
| ZZ | 92,1 |
| 0707 00 05 | JO | 155,5 |
| MA | 41,9 |
| TR | 135,2 |
| ZZ | 110,9 |
| 0709 90 70 | JO | 216,7 |
| TR | 116,7 |
| ZZ | 166,7 |
| 0805 10 20 | EG | 45,7 |
| IL | 55,7 |
| MA | 41,0 |
| TN | 49,2 |
| TR | 94,0 |
| US | 68,2 |
| ZZ | 59,0 |
| 0805 50 10 | TR | 50,9 |
| ZA | 54,1 |
| ZZ | 52,5 |
| 0808 10 80 | AR | 79,1 |
| BR | 69,9 |
| CA | 127,2 |
| CL | 81,8 |
| CN | 93,5 |
| NZ | 102,9 |
| US | 131,8 |
| UY | 71,7 |
| ZA | 81,4 |
| ZZ | 93,3 |

(EUR/100 kg)

CN code

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

0702 00 00

MA

58,0

TN

115,0

TR

103,4

ZZ

92,1

0707 00 05

JO

155,5

MA

41,9

TR

135,2

ZZ

110,9

0709 90 70

JO

216,7

TR

116,7

ZZ

166,7

0805 10 20

EG

45,7

IL

55,7

MA

41,0

TN

49,2

TR

94,0

US

68,2

ZZ

59,0

0805 50 10

TR

50,9

ZA

54,1

ZZ

52,5

0808 10 80

AR

79,1

BR

69,9

CA

127,2

CL

81,8

CN

93,5

NZ

102,9

US

131,8

UY

71,7

ZA

81,4

ZZ

93,3

---

(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
  ZZ
  ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.1

DIRECTORS OF NATIONAL PROCESSING, INC.
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
POWERS OF ATTORNEY

         The undersigned Directors of National Processing, Inc., an Ohio
corporation (the "Corporation"), which anticipates filing a form 10-K annual
report pursuant to Section 12(g) Securities and Exchange Commission Act of 1934
for the Corporation's fiscal year ended December 31, 1999, with the Securities
and Exchange Commission hereby constitute and appoint David L. Zoeller, Carlton
E. Langer, David E. Fountain and Thomas A. Richlovsky, and each of them, with
full power of substitution and resubstitution, as attorneys or attorney to sign
for each of us and in our names, in the capacity indicated below, said Form
10-K, and any and all amendments and exhibits thereto, or other documents to be
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pertaining thereto, with full
power and authority to do and perform any and all acts and things whatsoever
required and necessary to be done in the premises, as fully to all intents and
purposes as I could do if personally present, hereby ratifying and approving the
acts of said attorneys, and any of them, and any such substitute.

         EXECUTED this 9th day of February, 2000.


    /s/   Robert G. Siefers                          Chairman and Director
--------------------------------------
        Robert G. Siefers



   /s/   James R. Bell, III                          Director
--------------------------------------
         James R. Bell, III


--------------------------------------
         Aureliano Gonzalez-Baz                      Director



--------------------------------------
         Christos M. Cotsakos                        Director




   /s/   Jon L. Gorney                               Director
--------------------------------------
         Jon L. Gorney


--------------------------------------
         Preston B. Heller, Jr.                      Director




   /s/   Jeffrey D. Kelly                            Director
--------------------------------------
         Jeffrey D. Kelly



   /s/   J. Armando Ramirez                          Director
--------------------------------------
         J. Armando Ramirez
Glen Canyon Dam Technical Work Group Meeting Agenda

Arizona Department of Water Resources, 3550 N. Central Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona

Verde Conference Room

TIME Thursday, October 20, 2011

TOPIC

8:15A Welcome and Administrative: Shane Capron, TWG Chair Introductions and 

Determination of Quorum (16)

1. Approval of June 28-29, 2011, Meeting Minutes

2. Review of Action Items 

3. Old Business

 Ad hoc group updates 

 Report/Assignments from AMWG Meeting 

 EA, PA, & LTEMP EIS Updates

4. New Business

 Next TWG meeting January 31 – February 2

 Humpback Chub 5-Year Status Review on January agenda

9:25 GCMRC Direction and Tasks: Discuss challenges with GCMRC and upcoming To 

Do List – Jack Schmidt, Glen Knowles, Shane Capron

Desired Outcomes

 Shared understanding of GCMRC Issues 

 Discuss how and when to proceed with plans such as MRP, SSP, CMP, Annual 

Reports, etc.

10:40 B R E A K

10:45 GCMRC Direction and Tasks: Discuss challenges with GCMRC and upcoming To 

Do List – Jack Schmidt, Glen Knowles, Shane Capron (Cont)

12:30P L U N C H

1:40 Update on Economist Position – Jack Schmidt

Desired Outcome: Shared understanding of the process GCMRC will follow to hire an 

economist

1:50 Election of New Chair – Glen Knowles

Desired Outcome: Election of new TWG Chair for FY 2012

2:00 Socioeconomics Plan, Draft INs – Dr. Dave Garrett

Desired Outcome: Discussion and approval of draft Information Needs for the 

Socioeconomic Implementation Plan

2:50 Administrative History Project – Mike Yeatts or Sam Jansen (POAHG)

Desired Outcome: Agreement on a recommendation to AMWG on the prospectus

2:55 Public Comment

3:00 Adjourn
gnft-ex43_443.htm



Exhibit 4.3

 

Summary of 2019 BSA Plans

 

Share warrants or BSA (bons de souscription d’actions) are purchased by the holders and entitle each of them to subscribe for new shares of our Company at an exercise price set at the time of grant.

 

Administration. Pursuant to delegations granted at our general meeting of the shareholders, our board of directors determines the list of the beneficiaries, the grant dates, the purchase price, the exercise price, the number of BSA granted and the terms and conditions of the BSA, including the number shares underlying each BSA and their exercise period.

 

Grants. Our 2019 BSA were granted to scientific consultants of our Company. A total of 35,070 BSA have been granted under one (1) plan in 2019 (the BSA 2019 plan), which has terms and conditions as set out below.

 

Underlying shares. The securities to which our BSA give right are new ordinary shares of our Company. Each BSA 2019 gives right to one (1) ordinary share.

 

The number of ordinary shares to which each BSA gives right can be adjusted, upwards or downwards, as a result of certain corporate transactions, such as rights issues.

 

Standard terms. Our BSA are exercisable by tranches of a minimum of 2,000 BSA, or a multiple thereof, with an exception for any outstanding balance of unexercised BSA under 2,000.

 

 

The BSA 2019 have been issued at a price of €1.23 and at an exercise price of €12.32 per BSA.

 

Exercise period. The exercise period of the 2019 BSA plan is:

 


	
 
	
 
	
Exercise period

	
BSA 2019
	
 
	
July 1, 2019 to May 31, 2024
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 4, 2017

No. 04-16-00751-CV

THE UNITED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL.,

Appellant

v.

U.S. TRAILER RELOCATORS, LLC,

Appellee

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016-TXA-000111-D1

Honorable Elma T. Salinas Ender, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

A filing fee of $205 was due when this appeal was filed, but it was not paid. See Tex. 

Sup. Ct., Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, In Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and 

Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Docket No. 15-9158 (Aug. 28, 2015). The 

clerk of the court notified appellant of this deficiency, and requested payment of the fee. The fee 

remains unpaid, and appellant has not filed an affidavit of indigence. 

We therefore order appellant, by January 10, 2017, either: (1) pay the filing fee; or (2) 

provide written proof to this court that he is indigent or otherwise excused by statute or the Texas 

Rules of Appellate Procedure from prepaying fees and costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1 (providing 

that indigent party who complies with provisions of that rule may proceed without advance 

payment of costs). 

If appellant fails to respond satisfactorily within the time ordered, this appeal will be 

dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (providing appellate courts may enforce rule requiring payment 

of costs “by any order that is just”); R. 42.3 (permitting appellate courts to dismiss an appeal 

when appellant fails totality of the circumstance comply with a court order). 

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 4th day of January, 2017.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<PAGE>   1



                                                                   Exhibit 11.1



                              CARNEGIE GROUP, INC.

                  STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   1998              1997
                                                   ----              ----
<S>                                            <C>                  <C>
Net income (loss)                              $(2,232,000)         $388,000
                                               ============         ========
Weighted average common shares
     outstanding                                  6,497,584        6,278,594
Effect of dilutive shares
     outstanding                                    308,107          674,220
                                                  ---------        ---------
Dilutive shares outstanding                       6,805,691        6,952,814
                                                  =========        =========
Earnings (loss) per common share
     Basic                                          $(0.34)            $0.06
                                                    =======            =====
     Diluted                                        $(0.34)            $0.06
                                                    =======            =====

</TABLE>
From: <hfairley@usgs.gov>

To: <LWHETTON@uc.usbr.gov>

Date: 6/16/2004 1:18:24 PM

Subject: Geomorphology Symposium Update

Linda,

If it’s not too late, please include a copy of this email memo in the information packet for the upcoming

TWG meeting. Thank you!

----- Forwarded by Helen Fairley/BRD/USGS/DOI on 06/16/2004 12:16 PM -----

Helen Fairley

06/14/2004 05:21 PM

To: ahoward@pr.state.az.us, az86515@yahoo.com, BARGER@wapa.gov,

cuszhman@yahoo.com, damp@nm.net, farvana@commspeed.net, Force@grandcanyontrust.org,

Jan_Balsom@nps.gov, Jeffrey_Cross@nps.gov, jeffrey_lovich@usgs.gov, jgarrison@pr.state.az.us,

kdongoske@winslow-az.net, Ken_McMullen@nps.gov, lorjac@citilink.net, matt.kaplinski@nau.edu,

michael.yeatts@nau.edu, mnowick@achp.gov, norm_henderson@nps.gov,

ramsey@grandcanyontrust.org, steffanflyrock@lycor.com, tapeats@aol.com, rpeterson@uc.usbr.gov

cc: Lisa_Leap@nps.gov, mberry@uc.usbr.gov, Chris Kincaid/GLCA/NPS@NPS

Subject: Geomorphology Symposium Update

On June 9, a conference call took place between BOR, NPS and GCMRC, to discuss and resolve

concerns about multiple geomorphology workshop/symposium planning efforts that were being proposed

for this summer and fall. The parties agreed that a single planning effort made more sense, and that

GCMRC would assume the lead role for organizing the geomorphology symposium. It was further

agreed that BOR and NPS would collaborate with GCMRC in planning the symposium. A steering

committee was established, consisting of Chris Kincaid, Mike Berry, Lisa Leap and Helen Fairley. This

committee will be meeting shortly to discuss and finalize various details, including the dates, list of

invitees, and wording of the final invitation letter.

More details will be coming your way soon. In the meantime, if you have questions or suggestions,

please send them to the steering committee.

Please be sure to address all correspondence related to the geomorphology symposium to the entire

committee: hfairley@usgs.gov, Lisa_Leap@nps.gov, Chris_Kincaid@nps.gov, and

mberry@uc.usbr.gov.

Thank you!

Helen