alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Intelligroup, Inc, (the Company) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Madhu Poomalil, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

|(1) | The Report   fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the   Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (16 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d); and      
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                         
|(2) | The   information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material   respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|DATE:  March 29, 2007 | By: | /s/                      
|--------------------- | --- | -------------------------
|                      |     |                          
|                      |     | Alok Bajpai              
|                      |     | Chief   Financial Officer
#### SMITH v. ROGERS, ET AL.

(Decided June 16, 1912.)

Appeal from Bibb Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. B. M. Miller.

No counsel marked for either party.

Per curiam.

Affirmed on certificate.
Glen Canyon Dam Technical Work Group WebEx/Conference Call

November 6, 2013

List of Attachments

No. Attachment Author / Presenter

1 Action Item Tracking Report John Jordan

2a GCRMC Update – status of resources and sediment

conditions PPT

Dr. Jack Schmidt

Dr. Scott VanderKooi

2b HFE Protocol Decision Process PPT   

2c USGS Circular 1366:  Effects of Three High‐Flow Glen Knowles

Experiments on the Colorado River Ecosystem Downstream

from Glen Canyon Dam, Arizona

3a Budget Development 2015‐16 PPT Shane Capron

3b GCDAMP Budget Process Paper Dated May 6, 2010   

3c Budget Process Paper Amended March 20, 11  Table 1   

3d GCDAMP Biennial Budget and Work Plan—Fiscal Years

2013‐14

3e BWP Science Questions
EXHIBIT 99.17

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Colmena Corp. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period  ending  March 31, 2003 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Adam C.  Wasserman,
Chief Financial Officer and Controller of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.

/s/ Adam C. Wasserman/s/

Adam C. Wasserman
Chief Financial Officer and Controller
May 14, 2003
ATTACHMENT H

Case 3:14-cv-01772-MO Document 33-8 Filed 04/10/15 Page 1 of 2
1

Albert, Eric (ENRD)

From:

Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 10:22 AM

To: ENRD, PUBCOMMENT-EES (ENRD)

Subject: Linnton Plywood "settlement"

For starters, the sum of $450,000. seems rather paltry, to me, given the

types of toxics present in the river and bank soils.  I realize that the

corporation involved is looking for the cheapest way out...  This

so‐called "settlement" is nothing more than passing the buck on to the

next developer and tenants.  It is not immoral and unacceptable for that

reason.

Pamela Allee, resident

Case 3:14-cv-01772-MO Document 33-8 Filed 04/10/15 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
333-03284, 333-20897, 333-00454, 33-41248, 33-85798 and 33-96762 on Form S-8 and
333-07783 on Form S-1 of PLATINUM technology, inc. of our report dated April 28,
1995, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Trinzic Corporation,
appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PLATINUM technology, inc. for the
year ended December 31, 1996.


                           /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

                             DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

San Jose, California
March 26, 1997
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
**401 CAF 14-02222**  PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, CURRAN, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF AUBREY R.B.

--------------------------------------------- GENESEE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, ORDER PETITIONER-RESPONDENT; CODY B., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 3.)

BRIDGET L. FIELD, ROCHESTER, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. COLLEEN S. HEAD, BATAVIA, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT. JACQUELINE M. GRASSO, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, BATAVIA.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Genesee County (Eric R. Adams, J.), entered November 14, 2014 in proceedings pursuant to, inter alia, Social Services Law § 384-b. The order, among other things, transferred the guardianship and custody of the subject child to petitioner. It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Family Court.

Entered: April 29, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

LISA ARMSTRONG, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting 

Commissioner, Social Security 

Administration, 

Defendant. 

BROWN, Judge. 

3:15-cv-02204-PK 

ORDER 

Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued Findings and 

Recommendation (#16) on October 31, 2016, in which he recommends 

the Court affirm the Commissioner's decision denying Plaintiff's 

application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental 

income benefits. Plaintiff filed timely Objections to the 

Findings and Recommendation. The matter is now before this Court 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) and Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 72(b). 

When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate 

Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make 

1 - ORDER 

Case 3:15-cv-02204-PK Document 23 Filed 01/25/17 Page 1 of 2
a de nova determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's 

report. 28 u.s.c. § 636(b) (1). See also Dawson v. Marshall, 561 

F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 

F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en bane). 

In her Objections, Plaintiff reiterates the arguments 

contained in her initial briefing. This Court has carefully 

considered Plaintiff's Objections and concludes they do not 

provide a basis to modify the Findings and Recommendation. The 

Court also has reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de 

nova and does not find any error in the Magistrate Judge's 

Findings and Recommendation. 

Accordingly, the Court does not find any error in the 

Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation. 

CONCLUSION 

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings and 

Recommendation (#16). Accordingly, the Court AFFIRMS the 

Commissioner's decision and DISMISSES this matter. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this 25th day of January, 2017. 

/s/ Anna J. Brown 

ANNA J. BROWN 

United States District Judge 

2 - ORDER 

Case 3:15-cv-02204-PK Document 23 Filed 01/25/17 Page 2 of 2
# L_2009073EN.01001901.xml

| 19.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 73/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 73/19

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 16 February 2009

on the conclusion of a Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an Association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Kingdom of Morocco, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union

(2009/246/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 310 in conjunction with the second sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 300(2) and the second subparagraph of Article 300(3) thereof,

Having regard to the 2005 Act of Accession, in particular Article 6(2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Having regard to the assent of the European Parliament (1),

Whereas:

| (1) | The Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an Association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Kingdom of Morocco, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union (hereinafter the Protocol), was signed on behalf of the European Community and its Member States at Luxembourg on 13 October 2008, subject to its conclusion at a subsequent date in accordance with Council Decision 2008/881/EC (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an Association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Kingdom of Morocco, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union (hereinafter the Protocol), was signed on behalf of the European Community and its Member States at Luxembourg on 13 October 2008, subject to its conclusion at a subsequent date in accordance with Council Decision 2008/881/EC (2).

| (2) | The Protocol should be approved, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Protocol should be approved,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an Association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Kingdom of Morocco, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union is hereby approved on behalf of the European Community and its Member States.

The text of the Protocol is attached to this Decision (*1).

Article 2

The President of the Council shall, on behalf of the Community and its Member States, deposit the acts provided for in Article 8 of the Protocol.

Done at Brussels, 16 February 2009.

For the Council

The President

O. LIŠKA

---

(1)  Assent of 16 December 2008 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 324, 3.12.2008, p. 1.

2

(*1)  See OJ L 324, 3.12.2008, p. 3.

*1

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

v. 

DARRYL THORN, et. al., 

Defendant. 

3:16-CR-00051-BR 

ORDER RELEASING SEALED FILTER 

DOCUMENTS TO ADDITIOANL 

AUSAS FOR THE PURPOSE OF 

PREPARING APPEAL 

This matter having come before the Court upon motion by the government for an order to 

unseal filter materials as to additional AUSAs, and the Court being fully advised and finding 

good cause: 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the documents and transcripts related to the filter 

proceeding that are currently under seal may be provided to AUSAs Kelly Zusman and Suzanne 

Miles, along with the attorneys previously designated, for purposes of preparing the appeal in 

this matter. The government will not release, publish or cause to be published any portion of 

these unsealed documents nor provide a copy to any person absent further order of this court. 

Dated: October 2J , 2019 

Presented by: 

BILLY J. WILLIAMS 

United States Attorney 

Isl Amy E. Potter 

AMYE. POTTER 

Assistant United States Attorney 

PROPOSED ORDER 

A~ 

Senior United Senior States District Judge 

Page 1 

Revised March 2018 

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 2727 Filed 10/23/19 Page 1 of 1
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Pollinator Health in Southern Crop Ecosystems Research: Stoneville, MS
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Stoneville, Mississippi Pollinator Health in Southern Crop Ecosystems Research People







Kimberly  Huntzinger    Biological Science Technician /ARSUserFiles/55569/Kim Huntzinge-Me-2.jpg
 Contact Information USDA-ARSPollinator Health in Southern Crop Ecosystem Research Unit141 Experiment Station RoadP.O. Box 346Stoneville, MS 38776 Ph: (662) 686-3754Fax: (662) 686-5421


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference inthe Registration Statements Nos. 333-18981, 333-18983, 333-18985,333-18987, 333-18989, 333-29153, 333-63493, 333-36646,333-46126, 333-67710, 333-133346 and 333-137569 all onForms S-8 of SRS Labs, Inc., of our report dated February 24,2006 in the December 31, 2005 Annual Report, relating to the consolidatedfinancial statements and financial statement schedule, which appear in SRS Labs, Inc.’sAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2006.

BDO SEIDMAN, LLP

/s/ BDO SEIDMAN, LLP

Costa Mesa, CaliforniaMarch 21, 2007

----
# C_2006034EN.01000301.xml

| 10.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 34/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 34/3

---

Completion by the Lebanese Republic of certain administrative cooperation formalities to provide evidence of the origin of the product

(Communication made under Article 11 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 565/2002)

(Communication made under Article 11 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 565/2002)

(2006/C 34/03)

Pursuant to Article 11 of Regulation (EC) No 565/2002 (1) the Commission informs importers and the administrations concerned that the Lebanese Republic has forwarded to the Commission imprints of the stamps used by the Lebanese authorities, and the names and addresses of the Lebanese authorities responsible for issuing and receiving requests for post-clearance checks on certificates of origin. These requirements were fulfilled on 13 October 2005.

1

---

(1)  OJ L 86, 3.4.2002, p. 11. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 537/2004 (OJ L 86, 24.3.2004, p. 9.

1

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Bruce Reed, Appellant.

After viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we conclude that the jury could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree.

We have considered the defendant’s other contentions, including those in his supplemental *pro se*brief, and find them to be unpreserved and, in any event, without merit. Mangano, J. P., Niehoff, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.
#### POOLER, Respondent, v. NEW YORK EL. R. CO. et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 24, 1896.)

Action by Margaret Pooler against the New York Elevated Railroad Company and *1132others.

B. Tolies, for appellants.

W. G. Pekeham, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

February 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 127868(18) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 127868 COA: 256405 Kent CC: 00-009844-FC JOSEPH AMBROSE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's order of November 29, 2005 is considere d, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

d0221 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 27, 2006

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           8,056
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,294
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,781
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     44,360
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        110,755
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,803
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 172,074
<DEPOSITS>                                     148,917
<SHORT-TERM>                                     7,649
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                764
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,794
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,950
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 172,074
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  9,856
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,537
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   264
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                12,657
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               6,174
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,492
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,165
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    2,267
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  51
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,730
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     53
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                          53
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       153
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .44
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.08
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,300
<LOANS-PAST>                                       331
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,678
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    2,254
<RECOVERIES>                                       112
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,803
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,803
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1817 

To prohibit the provision of performance awards to employees of the Internal 

Revenue Service who owe back taxes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 15, 2015 

Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To prohibit the provision of performance awards to employees 

of the Internal Revenue Service who owe back taxes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Bonuses for Tax 

5 Delinquent IRS Employees Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON PERFORMANCE AWARDS TO IRS 

7 EMPLOYEES WHO OWE BACK TAXES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Commissioner of the Internal 

9 Revenue Service shall not provide any performance award 

10 (including, but not limited to, bonuses, step increases, and 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1817 IH

1 time off) to an employee of the Internal Revenue Service 

2 who owes an outstanding Federal tax debt. 

3 (b) OUTSTANDING FEDERAL TAX DEBT.—For pur4 poses of this section, the term ‘‘outstanding Federal tax 

5 debt’’ means any outstanding debt under the Internal Rev6 enue Code of 1986 which has not been paid after an as7 sessment of a tax, penalty, or interest and which is not 

8 subject to further appeal or a petition for redetermination 

9 under such Code. A debt shall not fail to be treated as 

10 an outstanding Federal tax debt merely because it is the 

11 subject of an installment agreement under section 6159 

12 of such Code or an offer-in-compromise under section 

13 7121 of such Code. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# L_2010327DE.01007901.xml

| 11.12.2010 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 327/79 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.12.2010

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 327/79

---

Berichtigung des Beschlusses 2009/426/JI des Rates vom 16. Dezember 2008 zur Stärkung von Eurojust und zur Änderung des Beschlusses 2002/187/JI über die Errichtung von Eurojust zur Verstärkung der Bekämpfung der schweren Kriminalität

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 138 vom 4. Juni 2009
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 138 vom 4. Juni 2009

Seite 19, Artikel 9c, Titel:

anstatt:

„Befugnisse, die im Benehmen mit einer zuständigen nationalen Behörde ausgeübt werden“

muss es heißen:

„Befugnisse, die im Einvernehmen mit einer zuständigen nationalen Behörde ausgeübt werden“.

Seite 19, Artikel 9c Absatz 1:

anstatt:

„(1)   Die nationalen Mitglieder können in ihrer Eigenschaft als zuständige nationale Behörde im Benehmen mit einer zuständigen nationalen Behörde oder auf deren Ersuchen im Einzelfall folgende Befugnisse ausüben: (...)“

muss es heißen:

„(1)   Die nationalen Mitglieder können in ihrer Eigenschaft als zuständige nationale Behörde im Einvernehmen mit einer zuständigen nationalen Behörde oder auf deren Ersuchen im Einzelfall folgende Befugnisse ausüben: (...)“.

---