alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### John H. Allen *et al. vs.*Charles W. McIntyre.

Submitted on briefs Jan. 24, 1894.

Affirmed Jan. 30, 1894.

No. 8562.

Vacating judgment entered on default.

Evidence *held*sufficient to justify the court in setting aside a default judgment on the ground that the summons had not been served on the defendant.

Appeal by plaintiffs, John H. Allen and Daniel H. Moon, from an order of the District Court of Eamsey County, *James J. Egan,*J., made September 18, 1893, setting aside a judgment entered December 1, 1891, against the defendant Charles W. McIntyre for $863.12.

*McLaughlin & Morrison,*for appellants.

*Edward G. Rogers,*for respondent.

Mitchell, J.

This is an appeal from an order setting aside a default judgment on the ground that the summons had never been served on the defendant.

The proof of service was the affidavit of one Belknap that he served the summons and complaint, personally, on the defendant, in the city of St. Paul, on November 9, 1891. It is settled that the proof of service, even when consisting of the return of an officer, is not conclusive, as against direct proceedings in the action to set aside the judgment. *Crosby*v. *Farmer,*39 Minn. 305, (40 N. W. 71.)

But such proof should ordinarily be upheld, unless opposed by clear and satisfactory evidence. *Jensen*v. *Crevier,*33 Minn. 372, *352(23 N. W. 541.) It would be dangerous practice to permit tbe return or affidavit made at the time to be overcome by tbe mere uncorroborated affidavit, made long afterwards, upon slippery memory, of tbe defendant, to tbe effect that no service was ever made upon bim. But tbis record does not, as plaintiffs seem to suppose, present such a case. It is a significant fact that although tbe judgment was obtained in November, 1891, and defendant was and continued a resident of tbe same city as tbe plaintiffs, and was actually engaged in business, and regularly, or at least frequently, buying large quantities of goods from plaintiffs, and frequently in their place of business, — not less than six times within a month after this action is alleged to have been commenced, — yet it does not appear that during all that time they ever spoke to bim about tbe matter, or attempted to collect their judgment, until August, 1893; and no explanation of tbis course of conduct is attempted to be given.

It is also to be noted that plaintiffs offered no evidence in rebuttal, except tbe affidavit of tbe party who claimed to have made tbe service, in substantially tbe same terms as bis original affidavit on tbe summons, and without any reference to tbe particular place where, or tbe circumstances under which, be claimed to have made tbe service. Tbe affidavit of tbe deputy sheriff to whom tbe execution was delivered in August, 1893, is of little or no importance.

Tbe delay of tbe defendant in moving to set aside tbe judgment is explained by bis affidavit that be was not aware that any action bad been commenced until shortly before be made tbis motion.

Upon tbe whole record, we could not say that the court was not justified in setting tbe judgment aside.

Order affirmed.

(Opinion published 57 N. W. Rep. 1060.)
EXHIBIT
      23





Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm








As
      independent registered public
      accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our report, dated
      December 6, 2007,
      with respect to the consolidated
      balance sheets of Tech/Ops Sevcon, Inc. as of September 30,2007 and2006,
      and the related consolidated
      statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ investment and cash
      flows foreach of the years
      in the three-year period ended September 30, 2007, included in this Form
      10-K, into the
      Company’s previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No.
      33-42960, File No. 333-02113, File No. 333-61229 and File No.
      333-104785).





/s/
      Vitale,Caturano
&
Company,
      Ltd.





Boston,Massachusetts


December
      26, 2007
#### BOHNET v. MAYOR, ETC., OF CITY OF NEW YORK et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July 31, 1896.)

'Application by Philip Bohnet for a peremptory 'writ of mandamus against the mayor, aldermen, and" commonalty of the city of New York and others.

James- R. Fancher, for appellant.

Charles Blandy, for relator, respondent.

Terence Farley, for commissioner of public works

PER CURIAM.

This "proceeding was com■menced - to- ■ obtain a peremptory mandamus requiring"'the. mayor,’ etc., 'of-the city of New York, 'the commissioner of public works, and the superintendent,of incumbrances to'remove from ’certain of the public streets of the city of New ■York certain incumbrances .described in the writ; 'and a peremptory mandamus was, upon the 28th of June,-1896, duly issued in accordance with the prayer- of - the petition. Subsequently; and on-July'2, 1896, an order to "show cause was obtained requiring the parties to that proceeding to show cause why an order should not be made directing the appellant, Doyle, to be made a party respondent therein, and this is an appeal from the order denying that motion. We think this order should be affirmed, upon the ground that, when the motion was made, proceeding was pending to which the appellant could be made a party. The writ of mandamus had issued requiring the public officers to perform their duty, and the proceeding had terminated. If any one interfered with the rights of the appellant he had a remedy against the one so interfering, but it would be useless to make him a party to a proceeding which had terminated by the final order and the issuing of the writ of mandamus under it. The order appealed from is therefore affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 167 (Wednesday, September 1, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 49061]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19007]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    The National Science Board (NSB), pursuant to the National Science 
Foundation Act and the Government in the Sunshine Act hereby gives 
notice of the scheduling of a teleconference for the transaction of 
National Science Board business, as follows:

TIME AND DATE: Closed teleconference of the National Science Board, to 
be held Thursday, September 9, 2021, at 2:30-3:00 p.m. EDT.

PLACE: This meeting will be held by videoconference organized through 
the National Science Foundation.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Chair's remarks; vote on transmittal to the 
Office of Management and Budget the FY 2023 budget submissions for the 
National Science Foundation, NSB, and the Office of the Inspector 
General.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Point of contact for this meeting 
is: Chris Blair, (703) 292-7000, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e4878688858d96a48a9782ca838b92"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3b5859575a52497b55485d155c544d">[email protected]</span></a>. You may find meeting 
information and updates at https://www.nsf.gov/nsb/meetings/notices.jsp#sunshine.

Chris Blair,
Executive Assistant to the National Science Board Office.
[FR Doc. 2021-19007 Filed 8-30-21; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
(AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kentucky Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:      May 14, 2009             By  /s/ Louis Prichard
                                    Louis Prichard
                                    President & Chief Executive Officer

Date:      May 14, 2009             By  /s/ Gregory J. Dawson
                                    Gregory J. Dawson
                                    Chief Financial Officer



28
Lexlibrary/197885.1
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 203

To amend the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949

to authorize the transfer to State and local governments of certain

surplus property for use for law enforcement or public safety purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 23, 1997

Mrs. FEINSTEIN (for herself and Mrs. BOXER) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

A BILL

To amend the Federal Property and Administrative Services

Act of 1949 to authorize the transfer to State and local

governments of certain surplus property for use for law

enforcement or public safety purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER SURPLUS PROP4 ERTY FOR USE FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT OR

5 PUBLIC SAFETY PURPOSES.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 203(p)(1) of the Federal

7 Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (40

8 U.S.C. 484(p)(1)) is amended by striking ‘‘required’’ and
2

•S 203 IS

1 all that follows through ‘‘offenders as’’ and inserting

2 ‘‘needed for use by the transferee or grantee for a law

3 enforcement or public safety purpose’’.

4 (b) APPLICATION OF LAW TO PRIOR TRANSFERS AND

5 CONVEYANCES.—Section 203(p) of the Federal Property

6 and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (40 U.S.C.

7 484(p)) is amended by adding at the end the following:

8 ‘‘(4) Any real or related personal property trans9 ferred or conveyed under this subsection before the date

10 of the enactment of this paragraph may, with the approval

11 of the Attorney General, be used for a law enforcement

12 or public safety purpose.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 31.2
 ENTRADA NETWORKS, INC.
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 RULE 13-A-14 OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1934
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 I, Davinder Sethi, Ph. D., certify that:
 
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Entrada Networks, Inc.;
 
 2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 
 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this quarterly report;
 
 4.  The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
 
 (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 (5)  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date:  December 15, 2004
 
 /s/ Davinder Sethi
 Davinder Sethi, Ph. D.
 Chief Financial Officer
NO. 07-07-0295-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL D

	NOVEMBER 28, 2007

	______________________________

	IN THE GUARDIANSHIP OF FLONA ROBINSON,

	AN INCAPACITATED PERSON

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 119TH DISTRICT COURT OF RUNNELS COUNTY;

	NO. 14,141; HONORABLE BEN WOODWARD, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

	ON MOTION TO DISMISS

	The appellate record has been filed in this appeal, but briefs have not been filed. Appellant Morris Robinson has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal because of the November 2007 death of the ward, Flona Robinson.  His certificate of conference indicates appellee Glenda Willingham does not oppose the motion.  No decision of this Court having been delivered to date, we grant the motion.  Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.  No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.1.  All costs incurred are adjudged against the party incurring the same.

						James T. Campbell

						         Justice
Washington City 

Where Dixie Began 

WashingtonCity.org 

March 25, 2024 

Bureau ofReclamation 

Attn: LTEMP SEIS Project Manager 

125 South State Street, Suite 800 

Salt Lake City, UT 84138 

Via Email only- LTEMPSEIS@usbr.gov 

RE: GLEN CANYON DAM LONG-TERM EXPERIMENTAL AND MANAGEMENT PLAN 

(LTEMP) DRAFT SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (DSEIS) -

89 FR 28, February 9, 2024 

Washington City's Interest in LTEMP DSEIS: 

Washington City Power (WCP) is a municipally consumer owned electric utility and 

Colorado River Storage Project ("CRSP") preference customer. WCP's CRSP allocation 

provides power to just over 11 ,800 of customers and generates on an annual basis 2,565 MWh's 

of energy for our community. 

Washington City Power Supports UAMPS' Comments : 

As a member ofUtah Associated Municipal Power Systems ("UAMPS") WCP supports 

the comments submitted by VAMPS. In particular, UAMPS joins CREDA's comments 

addressing the following issues in particular: 

1. Insufficient data on which to base a decision 

2. Cost impacts to Washington City Power's customers 

Sincerely, 

--- L. -------- ~ 

Rick Hansen, P.E. 

Power Director
Glen Canyon Dam Technical Work Group Meeting 

October 2-3, 2007, Meeting 

List of Attachments

No. Attachments Presenter / Author 

1 Action Items Kurt Dongoske 

2 Project Report Status (prepared by GCMRC) Rick Johnson 

3a Summary of Water Year 2007 Sand Supply below Glen Canyon Dam David Topping / Ted Melis 

3b Overview and Status of the Cultural Monitoring R&D Project PPT Helen Fairley 

3c Mechanical Removal of Nonnative Fishes from the Colorado River within 

Grand Canyon PPT

Lew Coggins 

3d Socioeconomic PEP Review PPT Helen Fairley 

3e Sonic Tag Testing - Preliminary Results PPT Matthew Andersen 

4a BHBF Science Plan prepared by GCMRC dated August 15, 2007 John Hamill 

4b DFC AHG Progress Report and Recommendations on Technical Adequacy 

of the GCMRC BHBF Science Plan 

4c DFC Ad Hoc Summary Report to the TWG, Oct. 2, 2007 

Ken McMullen 

5a Traditional Lands of the Southern Paiute People PPT 

5b 

Southern Paiute Participation in the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive 

Management Program, A Ten Year Review (report) 

Charley Bulletts 

6a Genetic Interrelationships among Populations of Gila cypha in the Colorado 

River Ecosystem Report 

6b Genetic Interrelationships among Populations of Gila cypha in the Colorado 

River Ecosystem Report PPT

Marlis Douglas 

7a Lake Powell and GCD Release Water-Quality Update PPT Matthew Andersen 

7b Project A2. Ongoing Provisional Monitoring - Downstream Quality-of-Water 

for Physical, Biological, and Chemical Sampling (includes R&D modeling) 

Ted Melis 

8a Characterization of Selenium and Mercury Exposure in the Colorado River 

Food Web in the Grand Canyon Report 

8b Characterizing Se and Hg Exposure in the Colorado River Food Web in 

Grand Canyon PPT

Ted Kennedy 

9 Shoreline Habitat, An Automated Approach to Classification and Monitoring 

PPT

Dave Topping 

10 Draft of Major FY08 AMP/GCMRC Milestones John Hamill 

11 Roles Ad Hoc Group Report
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Cattle Fever Tick Research Unit: Kerrville, TX
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Kerrville, Texas Knipling-Bushland U.S. Livestock Insects Research Laboratory Cattle Fever Tick Research Unit People & Locations







Manuel  Zavala
                        Cattle Fever Tick Research Unit

                        




                        
                        Biological Science Lab Technician (Biochemistry)
                        Phone: (956) 205-7693
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)
                            **Publications**
                                                (Clicking on the reprint icon
                                                    Reprint Icon
                                                    will take you to the publication reprint.)Do cattle exhibit avoidance behavior to Rhipicephalus microplus in a highly infested pasture?

- (Abstract Only)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### EX PARTE McCARTY.

(Decided June 18, 1912.)

Original petition in Supreme Court.

Sprott & Brockaway, and J. M. Foster, for petitioner. R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for tbe State.

McClellan, J.

— Writ of certiorari denied.
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Caremark
Rx, Inc. (the "Corporation") for the period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the Chief
Executive Officer of the Corporation, certifies that:



|/s/ E. MAC CRAWFORDE. Mac Crawford
Chief Executive Officer
November 8, 2002 |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---

QuickLinks
#### WALL, Respondent, v. HOWK, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fifth Department.

December 28, 1895.)

Action by Mary D. Wall against John C. Howk, as executrix, etc.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs, payable out of the estate.