alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2016097DE.01001401.xml

| 13.4.2016 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 97/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2016

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 97/14

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 206/2009 der Kommission vom 5. März 2009 über die Einfuhr für den persönlichen Verbrauch bestimmter Mengen von Erzeugnissen tierischen Ursprungs in die Gemeinschaft und zur Änderung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 136/2004

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 77 vom 24. März 2009
  )

Auf Seite 6, Anhang I, Teil 1, „Liste der Erzeugnisse tierischen Ursprungs, auf die in Artikel 2 Absatz 1 Buchstabe a Bezug genommen wird“, erhalten die ersten beiden Zeilen folgende Fassung:

| KN-Code | Bezeichnung | Geltung und Erläuterung |
| --- | --- | --- |
| „ex Kapitel 2
  (0201 -0210 ) | Fleisch und genießbare Schlachtnebenerzeugnisse | Außer Froschschenkeln
  (KN-Code 0208 90 70 ) |
| 0401 -0406 | Milcherzeugnisse | Alle“ |

KN-Code

Bezeichnung

Geltung und Erläuterung

„ex Kapitel 2

(0201 -0210 )

Fleisch und genießbare Schlachtnebenerzeugnisse

Außer Froschschenkeln

(KN-Code 0208 90 70 )

0401 -0406

Milcherzeugnisse

Alle“

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1871 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1871

                To authorize a nuclear physics program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 16, 2015

 Mr. Grayson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Science, Space, and Technology

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                To authorize a nuclear physics program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NUCLEAR PHYSICS PROGRAM.

    (a) Program.--As part of the activities authorized under section 
209 of the Department of Energy Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7139), the 
Director shall carry out a research program, and support relevant 
facilities, to discover and understand various forms of nuclear matter.
    (b) Facility Construction.--
            (1) In general.--Consistent with the Office of Science's 
        project management practices, the Director shall continue to 
        support the construction of the Facility for Rare Isotope 
        Beams.
            (2) Repeal.--Section 981 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 
        (42 U.S.C. 16321) is repealed.
    (c) Isotope Development and Production for Research Applications.--
            (1) In general.--The Director shall carry out a program for 
        the production of isotopes that the Director determines are 
        needed for research and applications, including--
                    (A) the development of techniques to produce 
                isotopes; and
                    (B) support for infrastructure required for isotope 
                research and production.
            (2) Coordination.--In making the determination described in 
        paragraph (1), the Secretary shall--
                    (A) ensure that isotope production activities do 
                not compete with private industry unless critical 
                national interests necessitate the Federal Government's 
                involvement; and
                    (B) consider any relevant recommendations made by 
                Federal advisory committees, the National Academies, 
                and interagency working groups in which the Department 
                participates.
                                 <all>
```
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Northern Great Plains Research Laboratory: Mandan, ND
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Employment
                        Work With Us
                                    ARS Vacancies at USDAJOBS
                    Local News
                        INTEGRATOR
                                    Bottom Line Ag SummitSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Mandan, North Dakota Northern Great Plains Research Laboratory Docs





- Northern Great Plains Integrator
- NGPRL Recycled Materials
- AgroEcosystem Performance Assessment Tool
- Crop Sequence Calculator
- Cover Crop Chart
- Request a Reprint of a Publication
- EEO / Civil Rights / Diversity

Request a Reprint of a Publicationheadline bar To request a Reprint of a Publication: click hereSubject line: type 'Request for Publication'Comments section include: publication's name your name, address, city, state, and zip code


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Johnny Rosa

*Ernest J. Diette, Jr.,*assistant state’s attorney, for the appellee (state).

No appearance for the appellant (defendant).

Argued April 1

decided April 1, 1975

The state’s motion to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County is granted.
# L_2009277EN.01002001.xml

| 22.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 277/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 277/20

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 14 October 2009

appointing the Deputy Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union for the period from 18 October 2009 until 31 October 2009

(2009/773/EC, Euratom)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 207(2) thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 121(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The term of office of the current Deputy Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union will end on 17 October 2009 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The term of office of the current Deputy Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union will end on 17 October 2009 (1).

| (2) | The Deputy Secretary-General of the Council should be appointed until 31 October 2009, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Deputy Secretary-General of the Council should be appointed until 31 October 2009,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Mr Pierre DE BOISSIEU is hereby appointed Deputy Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union for the period from 18 October 2009 until 31 October 2009.

Article 2

This Decision shall be notified to Mr Pierre DE BOISSIEU by the President of the Council.

It shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 14 October 2009.

For the Council

The President

E. ERLANDSSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 236, 7.7.2004, p. 17.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INTERIM
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND BALANCE SHEET AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q COMMUNICATIONS & POWER
INDUSTRIES HOLDING CORPORATION FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JULY 2, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001000654
<NAME> COMMUNICATIONS & POWER INDUSTRIES HOLDING CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-02-1999
<CASH>                                           7,041
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,685
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     55,329
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               114,276
<PP&E>                                          77,184
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 234,851
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          208,524
<BONDS>                                        121,215
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           23,298
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                    (13,011)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   234,851
<SALES>                                        187,192
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               187,192
<CGS>                                          148,647
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  148,647
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,092
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,237
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,232)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,232)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,232)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6246

ROBERT KNOTTS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

FRANK MCGUIRT,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief

District Judge. (CA-99-14-3-2-MU)

Submitted: May 13, 1999 Decided: May 19, 1999

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Knotts, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert Knotts appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. See Knotts v. McGuirt, No. CA-99-14-3-2-MU

(W.D.N.C. Feb. 12, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
(8 App. Div. 308)

#### SICKELS v. CANARY et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July 31, 1896.)

Mortgages—Foreclosure—Appointment op Receiver.

An affidavit made by plaintiff’s attorney as to the value of the premises, stating that he is informed by plaintiff that it is extremely doubtful whether the premises will sell, subject to the other incumbrances, for enough to pay plaintiff’s mortgage, is not sufficient to justify the appointment of a receiver.

Appeal from special term, New York county.

Action by Charles E. Sickels against Thomas Canary and others to foreclose a mortgage. From an order appointing a receiver of the rents of the premises pendente lite, defendants appeal. Reversed.

Argued before BARRETT, RUMSEY, PATTERSON, and INGRAHAM, JJ.

Joseph C. Rosenbaum, for appellants.

Jonathan C. Ross, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

There was no proof before the court .below to show that the mortgaged premises were insufficient security to pay the mortgage debt. The only affidavit upon the subject of the value of the property was the affidavit of the attorney for the plaintiff, in which he says that he is informed by the plaintiff that it is extremely doubtful whether the mortgaged premises will sell at a foreclosure sale, subject to the incumbrances mentioned, for enough to pay the amount of the mortgage to the plaintiff. There is nothing to show that the plaintiff had any knowledge as to the value of the premises, or upon what he based his statement; nor is the belief of the plaintiff’s attorney evidence of the fact. The rule is well settled that, to justify the appointment of a receiver of mortgaged premises, there must be some evidence of the insufficiency of the property to satisfy the mortgage, and in the absence of such evidence the court is not justified in taking the property away from the possession of the mortgagor pending the foreclosure action. As to the value of the property, the defendant swears positively that it is worth at least $100,000, and that statement is not denied, except by a communication of the plaintiff to his counsel, not under oath. We think, therefore, that the appointment of a receiver was unauthorized; and the order appealed from must be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion for a receiver denied, with $10 costs.
<PAGE>

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alkermes Clinical
Partners, L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Richard F. Pops, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Alkermes Development Corporation II, General Partner of the Partnership,
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Partnership.

                                       /s/ Richard F. Pops
                                       --------------------------
                                       Richard F. Pops,
                                       President and  Chief Executive Officer of
                                       Alkermes Development Corporation II,
                                       General Partner of Alkermes Clinical
                                       Partners, L.P.
                                       May 14, 2003
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

JEFFREY ADAM BRAY, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

UNITED STATES DEPT. OF HOUSING 

AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, SOCIAL 

SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, SUNSET EMPIRE 

PARKS & RECREATION, CITY OF GEARHART, 

CITY OF CANNON BEACH, and CLATSOP 

COMMUNITY COLLEGE, 

Defendants. 

PAPAK, Magistrate Judge: 

3:15-cv-00153-PK 

FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION 

Plaintiff prose Jeffrey Adam Bray filed this action against defendants for allegedly 

"switching [his identification] to gain access to federal benefits." Complaint, # 1. 

On February 4, 2015, this court ordered Bray to show cause (#7), within 30 days of that 

order, why this case should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim on which relief may be 

granted and for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 

Page 1 - FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

Case 3:15-cv-00153-PK Document 11 Filed 03/13/15 Page 1 of 2
After analyzing Bray's untimely Response to this court's order (#9), his Supplemental 

Response filed without leave (# 10), and the other documents filed in this case, I find that Bray 

has not shown cause. This case should therefore be dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a 

claim and for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and a judgment should be entered accordingly. 

SCHEDULING ORDER 

The Findings and Recommendation will be refened to a district judge. Objections, if any, 

are due fomteen (14) days from service of the Findings and Recommendation. If no objections 

are filed, then the Findings and Recommendation will go under advisement on that date. 

If objections are filed, then a response is due fourteen (14) days after being served with a 

copy of the objections. When the response is due or filed, whichever date is earlier, the Findings 

and Recommendation will go under advisement. 

NOTICE 

A party's failure to timely file objections to any of these findings will be considered a 

waiver of that pmty' s right to de novo consideration of the factual issues addressed herein and 

will constitute a waiver of the pmty' s right to review of the findings of fact in any order or 

judgment entered by a district judge. These Findings and Recommendation an~ not immediately 

appealable to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Any notice of appeal pursuant to Rule 4(a)(l) 

of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure should not be filed until entry of judgment. 

Dated this 13th day of March, 2015. 

Honorable Paul Papak 

United States Magistrate Judge 

Page 2 - FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

Case 3:15-cv-00153-PK Document 11 Filed 03/13/15 Page 2 of 2
#### Babcock *v.*Schuylkill & L. V. R. Co.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.*

July 18, 1890.)

No opinion. Application denied. See 9 N. Y. Supp. 845.