alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(25 Civ. Proc. R. 383.)

#### GEORGE v. FITZPATRICK.

(Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County.

April, 1896.)

1. Summons—Date—Variance between Original and Copy.

Service of summons will not be set aside because of a variance between the date of the original and the copy served.

*2.*Same—Order of Publication—Correction of Error.

Error in granting an order of publication can be corrected only on appeal where the order was granted on affidavits which satisfied the judge that the facts authorized the service.

*212Motion by defendant to set aside service of summons by publication, and the order directing the same. Denied.

Peck & Field, for plaintiff.

Hedges & Erdman, for defendant.

LAWRENCE, J.

This is a motion to set aside a service by publication and the order directing the same. The summons seems to have been dated February 20, 1896, and the publication was commenced February 26, 1896, and the notice published therewith stated that it was published pursuant to an order dated February 11, 1896, which was on a day prior to the date of the summons. I do not regard the date of the summons as so material a part thereof as to require the court to set aside the service of such summons on the ground of the variance between the date of the original and the copy. Welde v. Henderson, 10 Civ. Proc. R. 214; Wallace v. Dimmick, 24 Hun, 635; Sears v. Sears, 9 Civ. Proc. R. 432. See, also, sections 417 and 418 of the Code of Civil Procedure. There is no doubt about the fact that the summons in this case was served pursuant to an order of the court duly made,, and in the copy served the defendant was informed of the fact that the complaint upon which it was based was filed in the office of the clerk of the city and county of New York. The defendant, therefore, could not be prejudiced by an erroneous date, because she could have inspected the ■original summons which was on file for her examination and inspection. Even if material, the variance as to date between the summons filed and the summons published is a matter in regard to which the court can exercise its power of amendment. Code Civ. Proc. §§ 723, 724. As the order of publication was granted by Mr. Justice Beach, on affidavits which satisfied him that the defendant was either out of the state with intent to defraud her creditors, •or kept herself concealed with like intent, to avoid the service of the summons, any error which may have been committed in granting that order can only be corrected upon appeal. I think that the court has acquired jurisdiction in this case, and, upon the facts which appear in the affidavits, the defendant certainly does not stand in a position which entitles her to the indulgence or clemency •of the court.

The motion will be denied, with costs.
HBC Downlisting

Over

5

‐years (Demographic):

 Maintain six populations – stable: the trend in adult (age 4+; 200 mm TL) point

estimates for each of the six extant populations does significantly; and 

 mean estimated recruitment of age-3 (150–199 mm T

naturally produced fish equals or exceeds mean annumortality for each of the six extant populations; 

 One Core Population in upper and one in 

Basin >2,100

HBC Status Snapshot

Stable/Increasing

LCR(GC)
HBC Status Snapshot

Declining trend (SMB)
HBC Status Snapshot

Small, but considered stable per CPUE (0.01-0.035/net hou

Cataract Canyon

0

200400600800

10001200140016001800

2002 2003 2004 2005 

Adult Abundance Estimate
HBC Status Snapshot

Large declines in late 1990s; last 4 estimates @ 200-400 fish in 2012)
HBC Status Snapshot

Large declines in late 1990s, below 2,100 in 2008; Last 4 estimates @ 1300-1700 fish
HBC Status Snapshot

Large declines in late 1990s, below 2,100 in 2008; Recruitment limited
HBC Status Snapshot

Yampa:. Currently unknown if pure humpback chu

in Yampa Canyon
HBC Status Snapshot

Breakdown:

2 of

6 stable (LCR

& Cataract)

[depends on when

1st data point begins

4 of 6?]



1 of

6 may be functionally extirpated (Yampa)



1 population meets MVP of 2,100 (LCR/GC)

MVP may change (USFWS in prep.; USBR 2011

Conservation Measure)
Recovery/Viability 3-R

 Resiliency is defined as the ability of the species to wit

stochastic events (arising from random factors). Healthy p

are more resilient and better able to withstand disturbanrandom fluctuations in birth rates, variations in rainfall, oof anthropogenic activities.

 Redundancy is defined as the ability of

a species to wit

catastrophic events (a rare destructive natural event or e

involving many populations and occurring suddenly).

 Representation is defined as the ability of

a species to 

changing environmental conditions. Representation can bmeasured through the breadth of genetic diversity within 

populations and the ecological diversity (also called envirovariation or diversity) of populations across the species’ r
KAB Delisting

 New taxonomic clarification Species Lead – Region

6

 MDL dominating listing actions thru 2016

3 ways to achieve delisting:

 Petition

5

‐year species review

 Agency initiative

 Action post

‐2017 at earliest
# C_2006292EN.01000201.xml

| 1.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 292/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 292/2

---

Radio astronomy stations to be protected pursuant to Article 6(2) of Decision 2005/50/EC

(2006/C 292/02)

| Member State | Name of station | Geographic latitude | Geographic L-longitude | Radius of exclusion zone (m) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Germany | EFFELSBERG | 50° 31′ 32′′ N | 06° 53′ 00′′E | 6 500 |
| Spain | ROBLEDO | 40° 25′ 38′′ N | 04° 14′ 57′′ W | 7 000 |
| YEBES | 40° 31′ 27′′ N | 03° 05′ 22′′ W | 15 000 |
| France | Plateau de BURE | 44° 38′ 01′′ N | 05° 54′ 26′′ E | 35 000 |
| FLOIRAC | 44° 50′ 10′′ N | 00° 31′ 37′′ W | 35 000 |
| Italy | MEDICINA | 44° 31′ 15′′ N | 11° 38′ 49′′ E | 20 000 |
| NOTO | 36° 52′ 34′′ N | 14° 59′ 21′′ E | 8 000 |
| SAN BASILIO | 39° 29′ 50′′ N | 09° 14′ 40′′ E | 15 000 |
| Latvia | VENTSPILS | 57° 33′ 12′′ N | 21° 51′ 17′′ E | 8 500 |
| Hungary | PENC | 47° 47′ 22′′ N | 19° 16′ 53′′E | 2 000 |
| Poland | FORT SKALA | 50° 03′ 18′′ N | 19° 49′ 36′′E | 1 000 |
| PIWNICE | 52° 54′ 48′′ N | 18° 33′ 30′′ E | 1 000 |
| Finland | METSAHOVI | 60° 13′ 04′′ N | 24° 23′ 37′′ E | 7 000 |
| TUORLA | 60° 24′ 56′′ N | 22° 26′ 31′′ E | 5 000 |
| Sweden | ONSALA | 57° 23′ 45′′ N | 11° 55′ 35′′ E | 12 000 |
| United Kingdom | CAMBRIDGE | 52° 09′ 59′′ N | 00° 02′ 20′′ E | 9 000 |
| DARNHALL | 53° 09′ 22′′ N | 02° 32′ 03′′ W | 5 000 |
| JODRELL BANK | 53° 14′ 10′′ N | 02° 18′ 26′′ W | 9 000 |
| KNOCKIN | 52° 47′ 24′′ N | 02° 59′ 45′′ W | 5 000 |
| PICKMERE | 53° 17′ 18′′ N | 02° 26′ 38′′ W | 5 000 |

Member State

Name of station

Geographic latitude

Geographic L-longitude

Radius of exclusion zone (m)

Germany

EFFELSBERG

50° 31′ 32′′ N

06° 53′ 00′′E

6 500

Spain

ROBLEDO

40° 25′ 38′′ N

04° 14′ 57′′ W

7 000

YEBES

40° 31′ 27′′ N

03° 05′ 22′′ W

15 000

France

Plateau de BURE

44° 38′ 01′′ N

05° 54′ 26′′ E

35 000

FLOIRAC

44° 50′ 10′′ N

00° 31′ 37′′ W

35 000

Italy

MEDICINA

44° 31′ 15′′ N

11° 38′ 49′′ E

20 000

NOTO

36° 52′ 34′′ N

14° 59′ 21′′ E

8 000

SAN BASILIO

39° 29′ 50′′ N

09° 14′ 40′′ E

15 000

Latvia

VENTSPILS

57° 33′ 12′′ N

21° 51′ 17′′ E

8 500

Hungary

PENC

47° 47′ 22′′ N

19° 16′ 53′′E

2 000

Poland

FORT SKALA

50° 03′ 18′′ N

19° 49′ 36′′E

1 000

PIWNICE

52° 54′ 48′′ N

18° 33′ 30′′ E

1 000

Finland

METSAHOVI

60° 13′ 04′′ N

24° 23′ 37′′ E

7 000

TUORLA

60° 24′ 56′′ N

22° 26′ 31′′ E

5 000

Sweden

ONSALA

57° 23′ 45′′ N

11° 55′ 35′′ E

12 000

United Kingdom

CAMBRIDGE

52° 09′ 59′′ N

00° 02′ 20′′ E

9 000

DARNHALL

53° 09′ 22′′ N

02° 32′ 03′′ W

5 000

JODRELL BANK

53° 14′ 10′′ N

02° 18′ 26′′ W

9 000

KNOCKIN

52° 47′ 24′′ N

02° 59′ 45′′ W

5 000

PICKMERE

53° 17′ 18′′ N

02° 26′ 38′′ W

5 000

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE HEALTHDYNE
INFORMATION ENTERPRISES, INC. CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           4,146
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,033
<ALLOWANCES>                                       376
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,245
<PP&E>                                           2,791
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,147
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,320
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,957
<BONDS>                                            406
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           209
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,468
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,320
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,701
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,580
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,666
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  14
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    496
<INCOME-TAX>                                       144
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                352
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       352
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02
        

</TABLE>
Matthew D. Colley, OSB No. 125084 

mdc@bhlaw.com 

BLACK HEL TERLINE LLP 

805 SW Broadway, Ste. 1900 

Portland, OR 97205 

Telephone: (503) 224-5560 

Facsimile: (503) 224-6148 

Of Attorneys for Defendant 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

MITCHELL CRAIGH KEITH, Case No. 15-CV-01950-AA 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

STIPULATED GENERAL JUDGMENT OF 

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

CESAR VEGA LOPEZ, 

Defendant. 

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(l)(ii), the parties hereto, by and through their 

attorneys of records, hereby stipulate that this matter be dismissed with prejudice and with no 

award of costs, disbursements, or attorneys' fees to any party. 

/Ill/ 

/Ill/ 

I/Ill 

/Ill/ 

//Ill 

/Ill/ 

PAGE 1 STIPULATED GENERAL JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 1158628 

Case 6:15-cv-01950-AA Document 17 Filed 07/06/16 Page 1 of 2
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the above-captioned matter is 

dismissed with prejudice and with no award of costs, disbursements, or attorneys' fees to any 

party. 

DATED of July, 2016. 

~~--=------------~-4'1___.,/ 

IT IS SO STIPULATED: 

BLACK HEL TERLINE LLP 

By: Isl Matthew D. Colley 

Matthew D. Colley, OSB No. 125084 

Of Attorneys for Defendant 

Hon. Ann Aiken 

United States Judge 

YERV ASI POPE PC 

By: Isl Damien R. Yervasi 

Damien R. Yervasi, OSB No. 954609 

Of Attorneys for Plaintiff 

PAGE 2 - STIPULATED GENERAL JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 1158628 

Case 6:15-cv-01950-AA Document 17 Filed 07/06/16 Page 2 of 2
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Infectious Bacterial Diseases Research: Ames, IA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Ames, Iowa National Animal Disease Center Infectious Bacterial Diseases Research Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Collaborations The Infectious Bacterial Diseases Research has a long and productive history of collaborative research involving stakeholders.  Current collaborators and projects:  Development and Testing of Mycobacterium Avium Subsp. Paratuberculosis Diva Vaccines in Dairy Cattle  Development and Validation of TB Diagnostics for Deer and Cattle that have been Vaccinated with BCG TB Diagnostics in Vaccinated Cattle and Deer Severe acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 Research Priorities SARS-CoV-2 White-tailed Deer Infection Dynamics and Antibody Persistence Experimental Infections of Elk With SARS-CoV-2


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
# C_2009050EN.01000701.xml

| 3.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 50/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 50/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5448 — Abbott/Advanced Medical Optics)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 50/06)

On 20 February 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5448. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5448. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lucas Rodriguez, Appellant.

— Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard Goldfluss, J.), rendered on May 6, 1985, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur — Sandler, J. P., Carro, Asch and Milonas, JJ.
Case 6:15-cv-01722-MC Document 5 Filed 12/02/15 Page 1 of 1
Seeking TWG Inp

November 16, 201

Grand Canyon Monitoring 

Research Center – USGKnowledge Assessmen

FY 2011
Proposed KA II Steps & T

1. Review outcome from 2005 KA I with TWG (NOV 2. Revisit Critical Questions from Strategic Plan rel

non-flow treatments with respect to resources of 

3. Seek TWG input about information needs/prioriti4. Elicit 1st round expert opinions from scientists ind

allow them to discuss views prior to 2nd round (W

2011)

5. Review outcome of Workshop I with TWG at Wo

2011)

6. Draft sections of KA II report (fall 2011) – empha

influence of experimental flow & nonflow treatmeresponses (e.g. HFE synthesis)
Processing Expert In

Step 1 – Pose a question pertaining to a flow or nonflow trbeen a focus of the AEAM process (or perhaps, organismanative & nonnative fish), then ask experts to provide their oof current data, models, literature, etc. about how certainly treatment influences a given resource, (0.75 to 0.85). Theassign a median value (perhaps 0.82 in this example) and 

confidence in their estimate (80%).

Step 2 - After individual expert opinion is obtained, experts input and discuss the various aspects of the question amogroup.Step 3 - Following debate over the various perspectives aninformation, the experts may change their input up or dowdiscussion about available data, models, literature and argdiscussion.Step 4 – Expert input is then averaged to assign a level of given question – this can be done for all treatments & resoupdated matrices
Other Approaches

Causal Mechanism Handbook – use methocausal relationships between flow & non-floand 11 GCDAMP goals (see handout from University of Canberra, Australia)Defer to Science Advisors – request that Scertainty about causal relationships across critical interest for a select few treatments tpriority concern in FY2011-12BDN – see “The use of Bayesian networks investments in flow and catchment restoratriver ecosystems” by STEWART-KOSTER (Freshwater Biology (2010) 55, 243–260

)
Documentation of KA 

FY 2012 – special oral presentation session Colorado River Basin Science & ResourcManagement SymposiumUSGS Circular – chapter book with informatII on flow and non-flow treatments & resourcsynthesized across relevant resources of inchapter might be similar to HFE synthesis in format of 10-20 pages)One of more Fact Sheets – summarizing the the KA II for one or more treatments/resourc
Bonus Slides for Knowledge Asse

Discussions with TWG
Glen Canyon Dam Operations from Sep 1 

Preliminary Data
Lower Marble Canyon Turbidity Sep 1 – 

Do tmatjust Can

How OpeSedPre
Lower Marble Canyon Turbidity Nov 1 – 

Do these levels of turbidity matter to new RBT that out-migrateShows influence of GCD operations on turbidity following Pari

Pre
Grand Canyon Mile 87 Turbidity Nov 1 – 

How do these levels of turbidity affect RBT in easternGrand Canyon?

Pre
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Athens, Georgia
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home People & Locations







William  Watkins
                        Location Support Staff

                        




                        
                        Maintenance Mechanic
                        Phone: (706) 546-3726
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

SHAUN M. SMILEY, 6:15-CV-00086-BR

Plaintiff, JUDGMENT OF REMAND

v.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN,

Commissioner, Social Security 

Administration,

Defendant.

Based on the Court's Opinion and Order issued June 3, 2016,

IT IS ADJUDGED this matter is REVERSED and REMANDED to the

Commissioner pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for

further administrative proceedings.

DATED this 3rd day of June, 2016.

 

/s/ Anna J. Brown

 

ANNA J. BROWN

United States District Judge 

1 - JUDGMENT OF REMAND

Case 6:15-cv-00086-BR Document 16 Filed 06/03/16 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the report of Impac Mortgage Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                          
|--------------------------
|                          
|/s/    JOSEPH R.
TOMKINSON
|Joseph R. Tomkinson       
|Chief Executive Officer   



August 9, 2005



|                         
|-------------------------
|                         
|/s/    RICHARD J.
JOHNSON
|Richard J. Johnson       
|Chief Financial Officer  



August 9, 2005



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Impac Mortgage Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Impac Mortgage Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.