alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2222 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2222

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to repeal the financial 
  limitation on rehabilitation services under part B of the Medicare 
                                Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 25, 1998

  Mr. Grassley (for himself, Mr. Reid, Mr. Hollings, and Mr. D'Amato) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to repeal the financial 
  limitation on rehabilitation services under part B of the Medicare 
                                Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reinstatement of the Medicare 
Rehabilitation Benefit Act of 1998''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF FINANCIAL LIMITATION ON REHABILITATION SERVICES.

    (a) Repeal.--
            (1) In general.--Section 1833 of the Social Security Act 
        (42 U.S.C. 1395l) is amended by striking subsection (g).
            (2) Effective date.--The amendment made by paragraph (1) 
        shall apply to services furnished on or after January 1, 1999.
    (b) Offsetting Portion of Additional Expenditures Through Payment 
Reform.--
            (1) In general.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
        law, for outpatient physical therapy services, outpatient 
        occupational therapy services, and outpatient speech-language 
        pathology services covered under title XVIII of the Social 
        Security Act and furnished on or after January 1, 2000, the 
        Secretary of Health and Human Services shall implement a new 
        payment methodology based on the classification of individuals 
        by diagnostic category, functional status, and prior use of 
        services in both inpatient and outpatient settings.
            (2) Budget neutrality in implementation.--Such payment 
        methodology shall be designed so that the methodology, taking 
        into account the increased expenditures resulting from the 
        amendment made by subsection (a), does not result in any 
        increase or decrease in the expenditures under title XVIII of 
        the Social Security Act on a fiscal year basis.
                                 <all>
```
Third Amendment to
                              Amended and Restated
                    Certificate of Limited Partnership of
                Geodyne Energy Income Limited Partnership II-B

     The undersigned,  desiring to amend its amended and restated  certificate
of limited  partnership  pursuant  to the  Oklahoma  Revised  Uniform  Limited
Partnership Act, as amended,  Okla.  Stat. tit. 54 (1993),  Section 301 et seq
(the "Act"), do hereby state:

1.    The name of the limited  partnership  is Geodyne  Energy Income  Limited
      Partnership II-B.

2.    The dates of filing of the Certificate of Limited Partnership and all
      amendments thereto are as follows:

      Name                                                    Date
      ----                                                    ----
      Agreement and Certificate of Limited                    11/6/87
        Partnership
      Amended and Restated Certificate of                     3/10/89
        Limited Partnership
      First Amendment to Amended and Restated
        Certificate of Limited Partnership                    2/25/93
      Second Amendment to Amended and Restated
        Certificate of Limited Partnership                    7/19/96

3. The Amended and Restated  Certificate of Limited  Partnership  dated March 9,
1989, and filed with the Oklahoma  Secretary of State on March 10, 1989,  stated
that the latest  date upon  which the  limited  partnership  is to  dissolve  is
December 31, 2001.  Pursuant to its terms,  the  Agreement  and  Certificate  of
Limited  Partnership  dated October 14, 1987 (the  "Partnership  Agreement") was
amended on  November  14,  2001,  to state  that the latest  date upon which the
Partnership  is to dissolve  is December  31,  2003,  provided  that the General
Partner may extend the term of the Partnership for up to four additional periods
of two years each pursuant to the provisions of the Partnership Agreement.

      Therefore,  the Amended and Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership is
hereby  revised  to state that the latest  date on which the  Partnership  is to
dissolve  is  December  31,  2003,  subject  to  extension  as set  forth in the
Partnership's Partnership Agreement.

      Dated:  November 14, 2001.

                                          GEODYNE RESOURCES, INC.
                                          General Partner

                                          By: /s/ Dennis R. Neill
                                              ----------------------------
                                              Dennis R. Neill
                                              President
Glen Canyon Dam Technical Work Group Meeting

November 13-14, 2001

List of Attachments

No. Title Author / Presenter

1 Attendance Sheets Members

2 Calendar for 2002 Kurt Dongoske

3 Diagram of the AMP Randy Peterson

4 Management Policies 2001 Bob Winfree

5 Restoration of the CRE Using Planned Flooding Barry Gold

6a

6b

Overhead Presentation

Aquatic PEP Review

Mike Bradford

7 Review of INs Document Barry Gold

8a

8b

8c

AMP 2003 Work Plan & Budget

GCMRC Carry Over Request

Approval of Carry Over Request

Barry Gold

Randy Peterson

9 Emergency Responses at Glen Canyon Clayton Palmer

10a

10b

10c

10d

Upper Colorado 2001 Precipitation

Water Year 2001 Lake Powell Unregulated Inflow

Glen Canyon Releases 2001-2002

Lake Powell Elevations 2001-2002

Tom Ryan

11 Trends in the Recruitment and Abundance of the Little

Colorado River Population of Humpback Chub

Lew Coggins

12 Interim Conservation Plan for Ambersnails of the

Southwestern United States

Jeff Sorensen

13 Sediment Ad Hoc Group Report Matt Kaplinski

14a

14b

Hydrology Presentation (Gilmore/Kubly)

Experimental Flow Ad Hoc Group Meeting Draft Minutes

Randy Peterson

15 Presentation on Comparing Stage/Discharge below the GCD

Gage and Lees Ferry

Steve Wiele

Handouts on back table:

 Drifting Fine Particulate Organic Matter below Glen

Canyon Dam in the Colorado River, Arizona

 Aquatic Food Base Response to the 1996 Test Flood

Below Glen Canyon Dam, Colorado River, Arizona

 Invited Feature: Restoration of the Colorado River

Ecosystem Using Planned Flooding

 Algal Ecology in Tailwater Stream Communities: The

Colorado River Below Glen Canyon Dam, Arizona

Emma Benenati

Joseph Shannon

Duncan Patten

Dean W. Blinn
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 31, 2010

0324 

# Order

March 31, 2010

139723

BEVERLY HARSHAW, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Deshon Harshaw, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139723 COA: 291980 Wayne CC: 07-727521-NZ CLASSIC CONE Y ISLAND, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 19, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND th is case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          137247
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    10497
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                147744
<PP&E>                                          801339
<DEPRECIATION>                                  791882
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  157201
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             4562
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      152639
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    157201
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                885428
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   198982
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 686446
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             686446
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    686446
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 217 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 217

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the payment to 
States of plot allowances for certain veterans eligible for burial in a 
     national cemetery who are buried in cemeteries of such States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 28, 1997

   Mr. Biden introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the payment to 
States of plot allowances for certain veterans eligible for burial in a 
     national cemetery who are buried in cemeteries of such States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAYMENT OF PLOT OR INTERMENT ALLOWANCE.

    Section 2303 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following new subsection;
    ``(c)(1) Subject to paragraph (3), the Secretary shall pay to any 
State, or agency or political subdivision of such State, a plot or 
interment allowance of $150 for the burial of any veteran who--
            ``(A) is eligible for burial in a national cemetery under 
        section 2402 of this title; and
            ``(B) is buried (without charge for the cost of a plot or 
        interment) in a cemetery, or a section of a cemetery, that--
                    ``(i) is used solely for the interment of persons 
                eligible for burial in a national cemetery; and
                    ``(ii) is owned by such State, or agency or 
                political subdivision.
    ``(2) The payment of a plot or interment allowance under this 
subsection shall be in addition to any benefits provided under section 
2302 or 2307 of this title, or subsection (a).
    ``(3) The Secretary may not pay a plot or interment allowance under 
this subsection for the burial of any veteran for which the Secretary 
pays a plot or interment allowance under subsection (b)(1).''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


                                                      JURISDICTION OF        
                                                      ---------------
             COMPANY NAME                       INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION
             ------------                       -----------------------------

   1.   Allesee Orthodontic Appliances, Inc.              Wisconsin
   2.   Barnstead Thermolyne Corporation                  Delaware
   3.   Bedford Mirror, Inc.                              Connecticut
   4.   belle de st. claire, inc.                         Wisconsin
   5.   CASCO Standards, Inc.                             Wisconsin
   6.   Erie Electroverre SA                              Switzerland
   7.   Erie Scientific Company                           Delaware
   8.   Erie Scientific Company of Puerto Rico            Delaware
   9.   Erie Scientific Hungary Kft.                      Hungary
   10.  Erie-Watala Glass Company Limited                 Hong Kong
   11.  Ever Ready Thermometer Co., Inc.                  Wisconsin
   12.  Flexible Components, Inc.                         Wisconsin
   13.  Gerhard Menzel Glasbearbeitungswerk
            GmbH & Co. KG                                 Germany
   14.  Kerr Australia Pty. Ltd.                          Australia
   15.  Kerr Corporation                                  Delaware
   16.  Kerr GmbH                                         Germany
   17.  Kerr Italia S.p.A.                                Italy
   18.  Kerr UK Limited                                   England
   19.  Metavac, Inc.                                     Connecticut
   20.  Metrex Research Corporation                       Wisconsin        
   21.  Nalge Nunc International Corporation              Delaware
   22.  Nalge (Europe) Limited                            England
   23.  The Naugatuck Glass Company                       Connecticut
   24.  New England Reagent Laboratory, Inc.              Wisconsin
   25.  Nunc A/S                                          Denmark
   26.  Nunc GmbH & Co. KG                                Germany
   27.  Ormco Corporation                                 Delaware
   28.  Ormco de Mexico SA de CV                          Mexico
   29.  Ormco (Europe) AG                                 Switzerland
   30.  Ormco Pty. Ltd.                                   Australia
   31.  Ormex SA de CV                                    Mexico
   32.  Pure Fit, Inc.                                    Wisconsin
   33.  Richard-Allan Scientific Company                  Wisconsin
   34.  SDS de Mexico SA de CV                            Mexico
   35.  Sani-Tech, Inc.                                   Wisconsin
   36.  Sybron Canada Limited                             Canada
   37.  Sybron Dental Specialties, Inc.                   Delaware
   38.  Sybron Dental Specialties Japan, Inc.             Japan
Upper Colorado Regional Office 

Media Contact: Doug Hendrix Dennis Kubly 

 (801) 524-3837 (801) 524-3715 

Release Date: March 27, 2008 

Technical Work Group to Meet on Colorado River Topics 

Salt Lake City, UT – The Technical Work Group of the Adaptive Management Work Group will meet 

April 8-9, 2008, in Phoenix, Ariz., to address topics related to the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive 

Management Program and the Colorado River. 

Technical Work Group meetings are held to discuss technical matters and facilitate recommendations for 

use by the Adaptive Management Work Group, a Federal Advisory Committee to the Secretary of the 

Interior on subjects related to the operation of Glen Canyon Dam and management of downstream 

resources in Glen and Grand Canyons. 

Noteworthy agenda items will include a discussion on the Science Advisors’ Review of the USGS 

Science Plan for the recent High Flow Test on the Colorado River; a presentation of a preliminary report 

on the archeological excavations at the 9-mile site in Glen Canyon; discussions on the High Flow Test 

Biological Opinion and related conservation measures; and, an update on the Long Term Experimental 

Plan for the Colorado River. The meeting is open to the public. 

The Technical Work Group is a sub-committee of the Adaptive Management Work Group and is 

comprised of technical representatives who represent members of the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive 

Management Program. Responsibilities of the Technical Work Group include the development of criteria 

and standards for monitoring and research programs; provide periodic reviews and updates; and provide 

information, as necessary, to the Adaptive Management Work Group. 

On Tuesday, April 8, the meeting will be held at Bureau of Indian Affairs, 2 Arizona Center, 400 N. 5th 

St., 12th Floor Conference Room, Rooms A&B. On Wednesday, April 9, the meeting will be held at 

Arizona State University’s Downtown Campus located at 50 E. Monroe Street, Building C., 3rd Floor, 

Room 340. The meeting will begin at 9:30 a.m. and conclude at 5:00 p.m., PST, on April 8, and will run 

from 8:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., PST, on April 9. For more information on the Technical Work Group 

Meetings, please visit our Website at: http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/index.html

### 

Reclamation is the largest wholesale water supplier in the United States, and the nation's second largest producer of 

hydroelectric power. Its facilities also provide substantial flood control, recreation, and fish and wildlife benefits. 

Visit our website at http://www.usbr.gov.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T HA R R Y W. B AR T ON , P e titio n e r- A p p e lla n t, v. R O B E R T A Y E R S , W a r de n, R es po nd ent- A pp el l ee . N o. 07- 15939 D . C. N o . CV - 0 6 - 0 3 6 4 6 - SI ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e N o rth e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia S us a n I l l s t on, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d J a nua ry10, 2011 ** B efo re: B E E Z E R , T A L L M A N , an dC A L L A H A N , C i rcu i tJu d g es 

# FI LED JAN 19 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSW e c e rt i f yf orappe a l , on ourow n m ot i on, the i s s ue of w he the rthe 1 20 05 deci si on of the C al i forni a B oard of P ar ol e H eari ng s t o d eny par ol e vi ol at ed d u e p ro ce ss . W e d ec li n e to issu e a ce rtificate o f ap p ea lab il ity a s to B ar to n ’s rem ai n i n g cl ai m s. 07- 15939 2 C al i forni a s t at e pri soner H arryW . B art on appeal s pro se fr om the di stri ct c ourt ’ s j udgm e ntde ny i ng hi s 28 U . S . C . § 2254 habe a s pe t i t i on. W e ha ve ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 2 2 5 3 , a n dw e a f f irm . 1 B a rt on c ont e nds tha tthe B oa r d of P a r ol e H e a r i ngs ’ s 2005 de c i s i on t o de ny hi m pa r ol e w a s nots upport e d by“ s om e e vi de nc e ” a nd the r e f or e vi ol a t e d hi s due proces s r i gh t s. T he st at e c ou rtdi d n otun re as on abl y c on cl ud e thatsom e e vi dence s u p p o rts th e B o ar d ’s d e c is io n . See 2 8 U .S .C . § 2 2 5 4 ( d ) ; see a l so H ayw ard v. M a rs h a ll , 6 0 3 F .3 d5 4 6 , 5 6 2 - 6 3 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 0 ) . A FFI R M ED .
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2050 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2050

To amend title 10, United States Code, to prohibit members of the Armed 
     Forces from entering into correctional facilities to present 
decorations to persons who commit certain crimes before being presented 
                           such decorations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 1998

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 10, United States Code, to prohibit members of the Armed 
     Forces from entering into correctional facilities to present 
decorations to persons who commit certain crimes before being presented 
                           such decorations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON ENTRY INTO CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES FOR 
              PRESENTATION OF DECORATIONS TO PERSONS WHO COMMIT CERTAIN 
              CRIMES BEFORE PRESENTATION.

    (a) Prohibition.--Chapter 57 of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 1132. Presentation of decorations: prohibition on entering into 
              correctional facilities for certain presentations
    ``(a) Prohibition.--No member of the armed forces may enter into a 
Federal, State, or local correctional facility for purposes of 
presenting a decoration to a person who has been convicted of a serious 
violent felony.
    ``(b) Definitions.--In this section:
            ``(1) The term `decoration' means any decoration or award 
        that may be presented or awarded to a member of the armed 
        forces.
            ``(2) The term `serious violent felony' has the meaning 
        given that term in section 3359(c)(2)(F) of title 18.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
that chapter is amended by adding at the end the following:

``1132. Presentation of decorations: prohibition on entering into 
                            correctional facilities for certain 
                            presentations.''.
                                 <all>
```
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1456

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 8, 1997

Referred to the Committee on Resources

AN ACT

To authorize an interpretive center at Fort Peck Dam,

Montana.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1456 RFH

1 SECTION 1. FORT PECK DAM INTERPRETIVE CENTER.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Director of Fish and Wildlife

3 shall design, construct, furnish, and equip an historical,

4 cultural and paleontological interpretive center and mu5 seum to be located at Fort Peck Dam, Montana.

6 (b) COORDINATION.—In carrying out subsection (a),

7 the Director of Fish and Wildlife shall coordinate with of8 ficials of the Bureau of Reclamation, Bureau of Land

9 Management, United States Army Corps of Engineers and

10 the Fort Peck Dam Interpretive Center and Museum.

11 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is

12 authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section a

13 total of $10,000,000. Funds appropriated are available

14 until expended.

Passed the Senate November 7, 1997.

Attest: GARY SISCO,

Secretary.