alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Southern Paiute Vegetation a

Cultural Resource Monitorin

Program

Charley Bulletts

Southern Paiute Consortium
Monitoring Program

• History• Process• Schedule

Site 2014 2015 2016 2017

South Canyon beach, archaeology beach, cultural* beach, archaeology beach, cultural

Nankoweap archaeology plants, cultural archaeology plants, cultural

Lava/Chuar archaeology archaeologyTanner archaeology archaeologyBedrock plants, culturalDeer Creek beach, archaeology, plants beach, archaeology, plants beach, archaeology, plants beach, archaeology

Kanab Creek beach, archaeology beach, archaeology beach, archaeology beach, archaeology

Vulcan’s Anvil cultural plants, cultural cultural culturalWhitmore beach, archaeology beach, archaeology beach, archaeology beach, archaeology

Pre‐Parashant archaeology, plantsOmpi cultural Cultural cultural culturalSpring Canyon archaeology, plants plants, cultural archaeology, plants plants, cultural

Indian Canyon archaeology Cultural archaeology cultural

Pumpkin Spring spring, cultural spring, cultural spring, cultural spring, cultural

Ledges archaeology, spring archaeology, spring

Granite Park cultural Cultural cultural cultural
Beach at South Canyon

2011 2012 2013 

Photos from four consecutive monitoring trips show an

increase in sediment as well as vegetation change and 

effects of the tamarisk beetle.
Tamarisk at South Canyon

South Canyon: comparison of sediment on floor of c

and tamarisk affected by tamarisk beetle.

2010 (left) to 2012 (right)
Beach at Kanab Creek

2012 2013

Photos from 2012 and 2013 show an increase in sedim
Plant Monitoring

Deer Creek agave, 2014 Nankoweap 

At left: Percent cove

Kanab Creek Transec

Above: Lower portio

Transect 1, with desi

Pear.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The  schedule  contains  summary   information   extracted  from  the  Financial
statements of the December 31, 1997 Form 10-K of Aircraft  Income  Partners L.P.
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       6,432,713
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,417,636
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,555,035
<PP&E>                                     91,516,052
<DEPRECIATION>                              71,503,840
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,567,247
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,987,008
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  27,580,239
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,567,247
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            8,787,319
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  853,775
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,227,309
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,706,235
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,706,235
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,706,235
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# L_2009127EN.01001001.xml

| 26.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 127/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 127/10

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 12 May 2009

on the European Capital of Culture event for the year 2013

(2009/401/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Decision No 1622/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 2006 establishing a Community action for the European Capital of Culture event for the years 2007 to 2019 (1),

Having regard to the selection panel reports of September and October 2008 regarding the selection process of the European Capitals of Culture in France and Slovakia respectively and the opinion issued by the European Parliament,

Considering that the criteria referred to in Article 4 of Decision No 1622/2006/EC are entirely fulfilled,

Having regard to the recommendation from the Commission of 20 April 2009,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

Marseille (France) and Košice (Slovakia) are designated as ‘European Capital of Culture 2013’.

Done at Brussels, 12 May 2009.

For the Council

The President

M. KOPICOVÁ

---

(1)  
  OJ L 304, 3.11.2006, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2009125EN.01001101.xml

| 5.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 125/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 125/11

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5380 — Air France-KLM/Royal Air Maroc/JV)

2009/C 125/04

On 19 May 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5380. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5380. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
Amy Baggio, OSB #011920 

amy@baggiolaw .com 

Baggio Law 

621 SW Morrison, Suite 1025 

Portland, OR 97205 

Tel: (503) 222-9830 

Fax: (503) 274-8575 

Attorney for Defendant 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

JOSEPH O'SHAUGHNESSY, 

Defendant. 

No. 3:16-cr-00051-BR-03 

DEFENDANT ' S WAIVER OF 

APPEARANCE AT ARRAIGNMENT 

Defendant, J oeseph 0' Shaughnessy, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 1 O(b )(2), 

hereby provides this written waiver of appearance at arraignment on the indictment in this case 

scheduled for February 24, 2016. He affirms that he has received a copy of the indictment. He 

affirms that his plea is not guilty. He understands that an initial trial date will be set at that 

arraignment and consents to allow counsel to represent his interests in the scheduling of initial dates. 

DATED: February 2016, 

SSY 

~-.~~ AMY BAGG , o. Jkj 011920 

Telephone: 503-222-9830 

Attorney for Joseph O'Shaughnessy 

Page 1 DEFENDANT'S WAIVER OF APPEARANCE AT ARRAIGNMENT 

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 125 Filed 02/08/16 Page 1 of 1
., 

' I 

' .l 

l 

l 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

i 

! 

I 

' l 

I 

i 

! 

! 

I 

I 

i 

I 

I 

I 

! 

! 

! 

l 

~ 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

David J. Schubert, 

Plaintiff, Civ. No. 6:15-cv-01755-TC 

v. 

OPINION and ORDER 

Roseburg VA Medical Center, 

Defendant. 

MCSHANE, Judge: 

Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 

15), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. 

Although neither party filed objections, I reviewed the legal principles de nova. United States v. 

Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude it is correct. 

1 - OPINION AND ORDER 

Case 6:15-cv-01755-TC Document 18 Filed 06/23/16 Page 1 of 2
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, Magistrate Judge Coffin's Findings and 

Recommendation (ECF No. 15) is adopted in its entirety and Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 

(ECF No. 7) is GRANTED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this 23rd day of June, 2016. 

2 - OPINION AND ORDER 

Isl Michael J. McShane 

Michael J. Mc Shane 

United States District Judge 

Case 6:15-cv-01755-TC Document 18 Filed 06/23/16 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

 

I, Boyd E. Hoback, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Good Times Restaurants Inc.:

2.	Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrant and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5.	The registrant;s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a)	All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

Boyd E. Hoback*President and Chief Executive Officer*December*27*, 2006
<PAGE>

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alkermes Clinical
Partners, L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, James M. Frates, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of Alkermes Development Corporation II, General Partner of the Partnership,
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Partnership.

                                      /s/ James M. Frates
                                      --------------------------
                                      James M. Frates
                                      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                                      of Alkermes Development Corporation II,
                                      General Partner of Alkermes Clinical
                                      Partners, L.P.
                                      May 14, 2003
PAGE 1 – ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

HEWAD NOORZAI,

Plaintiff,

v.

DABELLA EXTERIORS, LLC,

Defendant.

Case No. 3:15-cv-00045-PK

ORDER

Michael H. Simon, District Judge.

United States Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued Findings and Recommendation in this

case on July 24, 2015. Dkt. 14. Judge Papak recommended that Defendant’s motion to compel 

arbitration be granted. No party has filed objections.

Under the Federal Magistrates Act (“Act”), the court may “accept, reject, or modify, in 

whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(1). If a party files objections to a magistrate’s findings and recommendations, “the court 

shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings 

or recommendations to which objection is made.” Id.; Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3).

If no party objects, the Act does not prescribe any standard of review. See Thomas v. Arn, 

474 U.S. 140, 152 (1985) (“There is no indication that Congress, in enacting [the Act], intended 

Case 3:15-cv-00045-PK Document 16 Filed 08/25/15 Page 1 of 2
PAGE 2 – ORDER

to require a district judge to review a magistrate’s report to which no objections are filed.”). Nor, 

however, does the Act “preclude further review by the district judge[] sua sponte . . . under a de 

novo or any other standard.” Thomas, 474 U.S. at 154. Indeed, the Advisory Committee Notes to 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) recommend that “[w]hen no timely objection is filed,” the court review the 

magistrate’s findings and recommendations for “clear error on the face of the record.”

No party having made objections, this Court follows the recommendation of the Advisory 

Committee and reviews Judge Papak’s Findings and Recommendation for clear error on the face 

of the record. No such error is apparent. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS Judge Papak’s 

Findings and Recommendation, Dkt. 16. Defendant’s motion to compel arbitration (Dkt. 6) is 

GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 25th day of August, 2015.

/s/ Michael H. Simon

Michael H. Simon

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-00045-PK Document 16 Filed 08/25/15 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

1)       Thrift Shops of South Broward, Inc., a Florida corporation

2)       Thrift Shops of West Dade, Inc., a Florida corporation

3)       Hallandale Thrift, Inc., a Florida corporation

4)       North Broward Consignment, Inc., a Florida corporation

5)       Thrift Shops of North Lauderdale, Inc., a Florida corporation

6)       Thrift Retail, Inc., a Florida corporation

7)       Thrift Management Canada, Inc., a Canadian corporation

8)       Thrift Export, Inc., a Florida corporation

9)       Thrift Holdings, Inc., a Florida corporation

10)      Collectiblesandart.com, Inc., a Florida corporation
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.01


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors
Oak Technology, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
33-89446 and 333-04334) on Form S-8 of Oak Technology, Inc. of our report dated
July 28, 1998, except as to note 14 which is as of August 12, 1998, relating to
the consolidated balance sheets of Oak Technology, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
June 30, 1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended June 30, 1998, and related schedule, which report appears in the
June 30, 1998 annual report on Form 10-K of Oak Technology, Inc.


KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
Mountain View, California
September 28, 1998
# L_2009315EN.01004901.xml

| 2.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 315/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 315/49

---

EUROPEAN COUNCIL DECISION

taken with the agreement of the President of the Commission

of 1 December 2009

appointing the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy

(2009/880/EU)

THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL,

Having regard to the Treaty on the European Union, and in particular Article 18(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The Treaty of Lisbon institutes the new office of High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The Treaty of Lisbon institutes the new office of High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy.

| (2) | In accordance with Article 5 of the Protocol (No 36) on transitional provisions and as foreseen in the Declaration (No 12) annexed to the Final Act of the Intergovernmental Conference which has adopted the Treaty of Lisbon, the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy appointed during the term of office of a Commission should become a Member of the Commission for the remainder of the Commission's term of office. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In accordance with Article 5 of the Protocol (No 36) on transitional provisions and as foreseen in the Declaration (No 12) annexed to the Final Act of the Intergovernmental Conference which has adopted the Treaty of Lisbon, the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy appointed during the term of office of a Commission should become a Member of the Commission for the remainder of the Commission's term of office.

| (3) | The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy should be appointed, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy should be appointed,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Baroness Catherine Margaret ASHTON OF UPHOLLAND is hereby appointed High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy for the period from 1 December 2009 until the end of the current term of office of the Commission.

Article 2

This Decision shall be notified to Baroness Catherine Margaret ASHTON OF UPHOLLAND by the President of the European Council.

It shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 1 December 2009.

For the European Council

The President

H. VAN ROMPUY

---
Exhibit 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Caraustar Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: March 13, 2009



/s/ Ronald J. DomanicoRonald J. Domanico, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
# ORIGINAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 23-0188 BANNER LEE BOYD,

Petitioner and Appellant,
v. STATE OF MONTANA,

Respondent and Appellee. 

# FILED MAR 30 2023 Bowen Gnatenwood Cle:k cf Supreme Court State of Montana ORDER

Banner LeeBoyd moves this Court for appointment ofcounsel in his recently filed appeal. He states that he is incarcerated and that he is financially unable to afford toretain private counsel. Boyd believes that he meets the eligibility requirements for the appointment ofcounsel. We secured a copy ofthe register ofactions from the Custer County District Court. On January 27, 2023, the District Court issued an Order denying Boyd's petition for postconviction relief. There is no right to the appointment ofcounsel in a postconviction proceeding for relief, although a court may order the assignment of counsel under the circumstances outlined in § 46-8-104, MCA. We conclude that Boyd is not entitled to the appointment ofcounsel. He represented himself in the District Court. He has not demonstrated that extraordinary circumstances exist, pursuant to § 46-8-104(3), MCA. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Boyd's Motion for Appointment ofCounsel isDENIED. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy ofthis Orderto counsel ofrecord and to Banner Lee Boyd, along with a copy ofthis Court's Appellate Handbook for reference to the Montana Rules ofPT r y l l
.late Procedure and access to its forms. DATED this3

## 6"

-

day ofMarch, 2023. For the Court,

hiefJustice 03/30/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0188