alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CONTROLLERI, Susan M. Knutson, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Good Times Restaurants Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrant and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

/s/ Susan M. Knutson

Susan M. Knutson

Controller

December 29, 2004
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

CANDY WESTPHAL 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

NANCY A. BERRYHILL, 

Acting Commissioner 

Social Security Administration 

Defendant. 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No.: 3:15-CV-01904-AC 

ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY 

FEES PER 28 use 2412(d) 

It is hereby ORDERED that, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 

U.S.C. § 2412, an attorney fee in the amount of $5,774.40 is awarded to Plaintiff. It is 

ordered that the attorney fee will be paid to Plaintiff's attorney, dependent upon 

verification that Plaintiff has no debt which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, 

pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 

2521 (2010). If Plaintiff has no such debt, then the check shall be made payable to 

Plaintiff's attorney, George J. Wall, and mailed to Plaintiff's attorney's mailing address 

at: 1336 E. Burnside St., Suite 130, Portland OR 97132. If Plaintiff has such debt, then 

the check for any remaining funds after offset of the debt shall be made payable to 

Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff's attorney's mailing address stated above. 

Page 3 - PETITION FOR EAJA FEES 

Case 3:15-cv-01904-AC Document 24 Filed 03/16/17 Page 1 of 2
I / 

IT IS SO ORDERED this ~day of m u/'-/J , 2017. 

Proposed Order submitted: 

Georg . Wall, OSB #934515 

gwall@eastpdxlaw.com 

Phone No.: 503-236-0068 

Fax No.: 503-236-0028 

/') /\ 

.· \ •·· I j / ! •. I I I / 

'·~/ I I, '· /, .-f-.. ~-.. ' v '.......,_....( ! 

Date: March 15, 2017 

Attorney for Plaintiff, Candy Westphal 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that the foregoing Plaintiff's PETITION FOR APPROVAL OF 

FEES PER EAJA and PROPOSED ORDER were filed with the Clerk of the Court on 

March 15, 2017, using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to 

the following: 

Sarah Elizabeth Mourn sarah.moum@ssa.gov, OGC.Seattle.ECF@ssa.gov 

Janice E Hebert Janice.Herbert@usdoj.gov, trudylee.fleming@usdoj.gov, 

Jan.Sands@usdoi.gov, laura.franzen@usdoi.gov 

0» 

Georg . Wal, OS No. 934515 

1336 E. Burnside S ., Suite 130 

Portland OR 97214 

Telephone: (503)236-0068 

Fax: (503)236-0028 

gwall@eastpdxlaw.com 

Attorney for Plaintiff, Candy Westphal 

Page 4 - PETITION FOR EAJA FEES 

Case 3:15-cv-01904-AC Document 24 Filed 03/16/17 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          55,636
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  166,411
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    195,849
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               475,481<F1>
<PP&E>                                         582,088<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                 113,337
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 944,232
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          436,383
<BONDS>                                        177,392
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        36,595
<OTHER-SE>                                     293,862
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   944,232
<SALES>                                      1,975,184
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,975,184
<CGS>                                        1,223,287
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,967,960
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              58,018
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (49,877)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (10,439)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 48,784<F3>
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,346
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .001
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .001
<FN>
<F1>Includes Deposits
<F2>Includes Intangible Assets
<F3>Debt Cancellation
</FN>
        








</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of OmniComm Systems, Inc. (the Company) for the six month period ended June 30,
2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, being, Cornelis F. Wit, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Cornelis F. Wit                                            
|Cornelis F. Wit                                                
|President, Chief Executive Office (principal executive officer)
|                                                               
|September 3, 2010
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, John Gunn, certify that:



1)	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of DataWave Systems Inc.;

2)	Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3)	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4)	The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

(a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

(c)	presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5)	The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

(b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls and procedures for financial reporting; and

6)	The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:	August 12th, 2003

/s/ John Gunn
Signature:  John Gunn 
Title: General Manager and Chief Financial Officer 
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Technical Work Group Meeting

DRAFT AGENDA

Glen Canyon Dam

Adaptive Management Program

Technical Work Group Meeting

Crowne Plaza Hotel - Pueblo Room

100 N. First Street

Phoenix, Arizona

Jan. 9, 2001

START

TIME TOPIC PERSON PURPOSE MATERIALS

10 a.m. Welcome and

Administrative

Rick Johnson

Randy Peterson

1. Introductions and

Determination of Quorum

2. Review Action Items from Dec.

7-8, 2000 meeting

3. Approval of Nov. 8-9, 2000

Meeting Minutes

4. Approval of Dec. 7-8, 2000

Meeting Minutes

5. Legislative Updates

See tabs for --> 

Agenda

Action Items

Draft Minutes

Nov. 8-9, 2000

Draft Minutes

Dec. 7-8, 2000

10:15 a.m. Narrative Discussion Mary Orton Discussion

12 noon L U N C H

1 p.m. Strategic Plan

Discussion

Mary Orton Discussion

3 p.m. B R E A K

3:15 p.m. Continuation of Strategic

Plan Discussion

Mary Orton Discussion

5 p.m. Wrap-up and Adjourn Rick Johnson
Technical Work Group Meeting

DRAFT AGENDA

Glen Canyon Dam

Adaptive Management Program

Technical Work Group Meeting

Bureau of Indian Affairs

400 N. 5th Street, Conference Rooms A&B

Phoenix, Arizona

Jan. 10, 2001

START 

TIME TOPIC PERSON PURPOSE MATERIALS

8 a.m. Welcome and

Administrative

Rick Johnson Introductions

Determination of Quorum

Agenda

8:15 a.m. Communication

Diagram

Dennis Kubly Discussion Communication

Diagram

10:15 a.m. Hydrology Randy Peterson Information Update

10:30 a.m. B R E A K

10:45 a.m. Experimental Flow

Ad Hoc Committee

Report

Randy Peterson and

AHC members

Information Update

11:30 a.m. L U N C H

12:30 p.m. Power Presentation

Diagram

Cliff Barrett Basin Fund Cash

Flow Diagram

3 p.m. B R E A K

4:30 p.m. GCMRC Reports -

Bibliography

Barry Gold Discussion

5 p.m. Wrap-up and

Adjourn

Rick Johnson
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CONTROLLER

I, Susan M. Knutson, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Good Times Restaurants Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrant and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

Susan M. Knutson*ControllerDecember* 27, 2006
Order filed August 23, 2013

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 00640

- CV

____________ IN THE INTEREST OF R .E.T.R. AND D.D.R., JR., Children

On Appeal from the 314th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause N o. 2012

- 04492J



### ORDER
This is an accelerated appeal from a judgment in a suit in which the termination of the parent

- child relationship is at issue

. Appeals in parental termination cases and child protection cases are to be brought to final disposition

w ithin 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a). The notice of appeal was filed July 23 , 2013. The reporter’s record was filed August 1, 2013, and the clerk’s record was filed August 2, 2013. Appellant’s brief

wa s due August 22, 2013, but it has not been filed. According to our records, appellant , C.R.A.J. aka C.R.J., is represented by appointed counsel, Katie Flynn

.2

Unless appellant files a brief with the clerk of this court within 10 days of the date of this ord er, the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-61138 Summary Calendar

JOHN STEPHAN PARISIE Plaintiff-Appellant

v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICA L SERVICES INC, Located in St Louis, Missouri; PHARMACORRX Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi USDC No. 4:05-CV-40
Before KING, DAVIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * John Stephan Parisie, Mississippi prisoner # K8188, filed the instant 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit toseek redress for alleged acts ofdeliberate indifference to his medical needs while incarcerated at the Mississippi State Penitentiary in Parchman, Mississippi. Parisie appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Correctional Medical Services, Inc. (CMS), PharmaCorr, L.L.C. (PharmaCorr), the dismissal of Dr. Juan Santos, and the dismissal of United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D March 7, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 06-61138

2 Parisie’s § 1983 suit. Parisie has also filed a motion to supplement his brief on appeal to add certain exhibits. Parisie asserts that PharmaCorr w as deliberately indifferent to his medical needs by failing to timely refill his prescriptions and that CMS and its agent, Dr. Santos, also acted with deliberate indifference in failing to timely provide medical treatment. He asserts that he suffered substantial harm as a result of the defendants’ acts of deliberate indifference. Our revie

w of the record reveals no error in connection with the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of PharmaCorr and CMS. See Cousin v. Small , 325 F.3d 627, 637 (5th Cir. 2003); F E D
. R. C IV
. P. 56(c). The
rec ord evidence does not show that PharmaCorr acted with deliberate indifference in failing to process Parisie’s requests. Because Parisie does not challenge the district court’s determination that CMS cannot be vicariously liable for the actions of agents, he has abandoned the issue on appeal. See Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987); Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). Further, the undisputed medical evidence does not demonstrate that Dr. Santos acted with deliberate indifference or that Parisie suffered any substantial harm as a result of the alleged delay in medical treatment. See Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 837 (1994); Mendoza v. Lynaugh, 989 F.2d 191, 195 (5th Cir. 1993). The facts underlying Parisie’s claim do not clearly evince the need for the medical care he claims Dr. Santos denied him. SeeJohnson v. Treen, 759 F.2d 1236, 1238 (5th Cir. 1985). Parisie has failed to show any error in connection with the district court’s j udgment. Accordingly, that judgment is AFFIRMED. Parisie’s motion to supplement his brief is DENIED.
#### ENO, Respondent, v. NEW YORK EL. R. CO. et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 20, 1896.)

Action by Amos R. Eno against the New York Elevated Railroad Company and others.

B. Tolies, for appellants.

W. Mitchell, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
eyes-ex101_6.htm



Exhibit 10.1

Amendment No. 1 to  

Executive Employment Agreement

 

This Amendment No. 1 to Executive Employment Agreement (“Amendment”) is made effective this 13 day of May 2020 upon the terms and conditions set forth herein by and between Second Sight Medical Products, Inc., a California corporation (the “Company”) and John T. Blake (“Executive”) or entities associated with him.

 

RECITALS

 

WHEREAS, Company and Executive entered into that certain Executive Employment Agreement dated as of March 21, 2018 (the “Agreement”); and

 

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company has approved a one-time cash bonus of $100,000 (the “Bonus”) payable to Executive in recognition of his services on behalf of the Company; and

 

WHEREAS, Company and Executive desire to amend the Agreement in certain respects as set forth herein.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in exchange for and in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

 

1.The Recitals set forth above are incorporated herein as if restated in their entirety.  

 

2Upon termination of Executive by the Company without Cause Executive shall be entitled to receive all amounts due to him under paragraph 6.1 of the Agreement less the amount of the Bonus. If Executive terminates his employment with the Company for any reason he shall retain the Bonus which shall not be deducted from any amounts payable to him under paragraph 6.3 of the Agreement.

 

3.Except as explicitly noted herein, all other provisions of the Agreement are hereby reaffirmed without change or amendment of any kind. All terms not defined herein shall have the definitions set forth in the Agreement.

 

4.This Amendment and the Agreement together with the exhibits and schedules thereto, contain the entire understanding of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersede all prior agreements and understandings, oral or written, with respect to such matters, which the parties acknowledge have been merged into such documents, exhibits and schedules.

 

5.This Amendment may be executed simultaneously in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same original.

 

 



Exhibit 10.1

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly caused this Amendment to be executed as of the day and year first above written.

 

COMPANY

 

Second Sight Medical Products, Inc.

 

By: /s/ Matthew Pfeffer

Name: Matthew Pfeffer

Title: Acting Chief Executive Officer

 

 

EXECUTIVE

 

 

By: /s/ John T. Blake

       John T. Blake
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Pepe Houston, Appellant.

The evidence proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the acts for which he was convicted *(see,*Penal Law § 165.05 [1]; § 140.00 [5]; *People v Malizia,*62 NY2d 755, *cert denied*469 US 932; *People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620, 621). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.