alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2009108EN.01005301.xml

| 29.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 108/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 108/53

---

COMMISSION DECISION

of 28 April 2009

on the request by Ireland to accept Council Decision 2008/381/EC establishing a European Migration Network

(notified under document number C(2009) 2708)

(2009/350/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, in particular to Article 11a thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 14 May 2008, the Council adopted Decision 2008/381/EC establishing a European Migration Network (1) (EMN) (hereinafter referred to as Council Decision 2008/381/EC). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 14 May 2008, the Council adopted Decision 2008/381/EC establishing a European Migration Network (1) (EMN) (hereinafter referred to as Council Decision 2008/381/EC).

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 1 of the Protocol on the position of Ireland, Ireland did not participate in the adoption of Decision 2008/381/EC. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 1 of the Protocol on the position of Ireland, Ireland did not participate in the adoption of Decision 2008/381/EC.

| (3) | In accordance with Article 4 of the said Protocol, Ireland notified the Council and the Commission that it wishes to accept Decision 2008/381/EC. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In accordance with Article 4 of the said Protocol, Ireland notified the Council and the Commission that it wishes to accept Decision 2008/381/EC.

| (4) | In accordance with Article 11a of the Treaty the Commission adopted a favourable opinion (2) on the request by Ireland on 22 December 2008, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

In accordance with Article 11a of the Treaty the Commission adopted a favourable opinion (2) on the request by Ireland on 22 December 2008,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Decision 2008/381/EC shall apply to Ireland.

Article 2

Ireland shall bring into force the provisions necessary to comply with Decision 2008/381/EC and shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof.

Article 3

Decision 2008/381/EC shall come into force for Ireland from the date of the notification by Ireland of its acceptance of Decision 2008/381/EC.

Article 4

This Decision is addressed to all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 April 2009.

For the Commission

Jacques BARROT

Vice-President

---

(1)  
  OJ L 131, 21.5.2008, p. 7.

1

(2)  C(2008) 8668 final.

2

---
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1884 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

206 West Commercial Street in East Rochester, New York, as the 

‘‘Officer Daryl R. Pierson Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 16, 2015 

Ms. SLAUGHTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 206 West Commercial Street in East Rochester, New York, as the ‘‘Officer Daryl R. Pierson Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. OFFICER DARYL R. PIERSON MEMORIAL POST 

4 OFFICE BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 206 West Commercial Street in 

7 East Rochester, New York, shall be known and designated 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1884 IH

1 as the ‘‘Officer Daryl R. Pierson Memorial Post Office 

2 Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Officer Daryl R. Pier7 son Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
ACCEPTED

01-15-00874-cv

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

11/10/2015 7:43:41 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 11/10/2015 7:43:41 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2024

To increase the penalties for trafficking in methamphetamine in order to

equalize those penalties with the penalties for trafficking in crack cocaine.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 1, 1998

Mr. ASHCROFT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To increase the penalties for trafficking in methamphetamine

in order to equalize those penalties with the penalties

for trafficking in crack cocaine.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Methamphetamine

5 Trafficking Penalty Enhancement Act of 1998’’.

6 SEC. 2. METHAMPHETAMINE PENALTY INCREASES.

7 (a) CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ACT.—Section

8 401(b)(1) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C.

9 841(b)(1)) is amended—

10 (1) in subparagraph (A)(viii)—
2

•S 2024 IS

1 (A) by striking ‘‘100 grams’’ and inserting

2 ‘‘50 grams’’; and

3 (B) by striking ‘‘1 kilogram’’ and inserting

4 ‘‘500 grams’’; and

5 (2) in subparagraph (B)(viii)—

6 (A) by striking ‘‘10 grams’’ and inserting

7 ‘‘5 grams’’; and

8 (B) by striking ‘‘100 grams’’ and inserting

9 ‘‘50 grams’’.

10 (b) CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES IMPORT AND EXPORT

11 ACT.—Section 1010(b) of the Controlled Substances Im12 port and Export Act (21 U.S.C. 960(b)) is amended—

13 (1) in paragraph (1)(H)—

14 (A) by striking ‘‘100 grams’’ and inserting

15 ‘‘50 grams’’; and

16 (B) by striking ‘‘1 kilogram’’ and inserting

17 ‘‘500 grams’’; and

18 (2) in paragraph (2)(H)—

19 (A) by striking ‘‘10 grams’’ and inserting

20 ‘‘5 grams’’; and

21 (B) by striking ‘‘100 grams’’ and inserting

22 ‘‘50 grams’’.

Æ
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Johnson, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pincus, J.), rendered September 4, 1985, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress the weapon from evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

On September 1, 1984, at about 2:00 p.m., three plainclothes police officers received a radio call of a male black with a gun, wearing blue jeans, a blue and white shirt and a "kufay hat” at East 18th Street and Dorchester Road in Brooklyn. The officers went to that location and saw the defendant, who matched that description, standing approximately 20 feet north of Dorchester Road on East 18th Street. There was no one else on the street.

As the police drove past the defendant, they saw a bulge in his waistband and saw his hand move toward his waistband area. The police exited their car, drew their guns, identified themselves as police officers and told the defendant to put his hands up. The defendant was told to put his hands up twice more before he complied. Police Officer Haas then approached *703the man from the rear, with the other officers covering him, and put his hand around the front of the defendant where the bulge was and removed a gun from the defendant’s waistband. The gun was in a holster inside the defendant’s pants, and the butt of the gun was above the belt. The gun recovered was a fully loaded 9-millimeter automatic. A further search of the defendant revealed two additional clips with eight rounds in each clip. The defendant was taken to the police station six minutes after the receipt of the initial report.

Accepting the version of the facts contained in the record and found to be credible by the hearing court, that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence was properly denied. The original information the police had in this case was sufficient to establish the fact that criminal activity was afoot *(see, People v Stewart,*41 NY2d 65, 69). The later forcible stop of the defendant and seizure of the gun were proper, based on the additional articulated facts that the defendant fit the description, he was the only one on the street, the police observed a bulge in his waistband, he moved his hand to that area, and he was recalcitrant in raising his hands, all of which formed the basis for a reasonable suspicion that the defendant possessed a concealed weapon. The gun was thus properly seized *(see, People v Benjamin,*51 NY2d 267; *People v Alexander,*120 AD2d 537). Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Kunzeman and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          62,531
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,212
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,132
<INVENTORY>                                      7,494
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                88,774
<PP&E>                                          20,746
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,203
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 478,721
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           62,278
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           307
<OTHER-SE>                                     415,572
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   478,721
<SALES>                                         28,644
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,644
<CGS>                                            9,490
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,490
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                65,748
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (693)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (45,901)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,582)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (42,319)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (42,319)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.54)


</TABLE>
#### Steven A. DRYDEN, Claimant-Appellant, v. R. James NICHOLSON, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 2007-7022.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

June 28, 2007.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of Steven A. Dryden’s unopposed motion to dismiss his appeal,

*993IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted.

(2) All sides shall bear their own costs.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Plant Genetics Research: Columbia, MO
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Columbia, Missouri Plant Genetics Research Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications
- IACUC Summaries

Collaborations The Plant Genetics Research has a long and productive history of collaborative research involving stakeholders.  Current collaborators and projects:


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.0

                              ANTARES PHARMA, INC.

  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT
                                       TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

        Each of the undersigned, Roger G. Harrison and Lawrence M. Christian,
the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of
Antares Pharma, Inc. (the "Company"), individually and not jointly has executed
this Certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and
Exchange Commission of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report").

        Each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:

           1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

           2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                 material respects, the financial condition and results of
                 operations of the Company.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this
Certification as of the 29th day of March, 2004.

                                       /s/ Roger G. Harrison
                                       -------------------------------------
                                       Roger G. Harrison
                                       Chief Executive Officer

                                       /s/ Lawrence M. Christian
                                       -------------------------------------
                                       Lawrence M. Christian
                                       Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Caremark Rx, Inc. (the Corporation) for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation,
certifies that:



(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Corporation.



Date: August 9, 2004



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|/s/    E. MAC CRAWFORD                 
|E. Mac Crawford Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 170 (Tuesday, September 7, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50142-50143]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19233]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Library of Medicine; Notice of Meetings, Amended Notice 
of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the virtual meeting of the 
Biomedical Library, Informatics and Data Science Review Committee, 
November 4, 2021 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., which was published in the 
Federal Register on June 24, 2021, 86 FR 119, Page 33329.
    This notice is being amended to change the meeting to November 4-5,

[[Page 50143]]

2021, times are from 10 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on November 4th and 10 a.m. 
to 1:30 p.m. on November 5th. The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: August 31, 2021.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-19233 Filed 9-3-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<PAGE>   1
                          NATIONAL PROCESSING, INC.

                  EXHIBIT 21.1 - SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                         % of Voting            State or Jurisdiction
                                          Securities               Under the Law of
         Name                                Owned                  which Organized
         ----                                -----                    ---------------
<S>                                          <C>                        <C>
SUBSIDIARIES OF NATIONAL PROCESSING, INC.
-----------------------------------------

National Processing Company, Inc.            100%                     Kentucky


SUBSIDIARIES OF NATIONAL PROCESSING
COMPANY, INC.
-----------------------------------------

NPC International S.A. de C.V.               100%                     Mexico

B&L Consultants, Inc.                        100%                     Massachusetts

NPC Check Services, Inc.                     100%                     Delaware

NPC Services, Inc.                           100%                     Arizona

NTA, Inc.                                    100%                     Washington

FA Holdings, Inc.                            100%                     Delaware

Caribbean Data Services, Ltd.                100%                     Delaware

</TABLE>
Merrill Schneider, OSB #77336 

merrillschneider@schneiderlaw.com 

Schneider Kerr & Robichaux 

PO Box 14490 

Portland, Oregon 97293 

Phone: 503-255-9092 

Fax: 503-255-9145 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

KELLIE KEEBLER, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 

 Defendant. 

6:15-CV-02202-MC 

ORDER FOR ATTORNEY 

FEES UNDER 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) 

The court finds and orders an attorney fee of $17,445.50 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). 

The attorney fee of $2,250.76 allowed pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act will be 

refunded to Plaintiff upon counsel’s receipt of the allowed 406(b) fee awarded. 

Dated this _______ day of ____________________, 2018. 

________________________________ 

Michael McShane 

United States District Court Judge 

19th October
Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program

Technical Work Group Meeting

May 16-17, 2002

Action Items

No. Item Status

1 Randy will check with Barry Wirth on 

preparing a press release for releases over 

Memorial Day weekend.

Done.

2 Ted Melis will provide the raw data from the 

1990 experimental flows to the TWG. (This 

was data collected by the USGS WRD but 

hasn’t been interpreted or published.)

Ted said he met with Nancy Hornewer last week and 

she assured him that by the end of the fiscal year 

(Sept 02), she will try and have an inventory of all that 

data. It’s a matter of trying to find physical records 

and she is working on that as part of her assignment 

to come up with a list of what should be available.

3 TWG to provide comments on the SCORE 

Report to Steve Gloss by June 15, 2002.

Steve said he received 3 comments (Gary Burton, Bill 

Davis, and Bill Persons). He said the SCORE Report 

has been on hold given all the work involved with the 

proposed experimental flow. He will respond to those 

comments and try and get back on track as time 

permits. John Shields requested Steve forward all the 

comments to the TWG members as well.

Action Item: Steve Gloss will forward all comments 

he receives on the SCORE Report to the TWG.

4 Steve Gloss will send a copy of Allan 

Haden’s unpublished manuscript (GCMRC’s 

Draft Report of the Aquatic Protocol 

Evaluation Program Panel, pg. 13) to John 

Shields.

John said he hasn’t received yet. Steve said he had a 

copy of what he believed the subject paper was and 

will discuss with John later today.

5 TWG Members to provide comments on the 

FY 2004 Budget to Steve Gloss by May 31, 

2002.

Steve said the TWG comments were used to revise 

the FY04 Budget that was presented to the AMWG at 

the July 17-18, 2002, meeting. 

6 TWG members to provide comments on the 

“Draft Integrated Water Quality Program 

Plan, FY 2002-2007” to Steve Gloss by 

July 1, 2002.

Steve said he only received comments from Bill Davis 

which he will circulate to the TWG. As he recalled, 

Bill’s and CREDA’s comments were largely to do with 

the balance of Lake Powell and downstream activities 

and perhaps a lack or as clear a definition as might be 

desirable of what exactly was going to be done 

downstream. He said the GCMRC probably needs to 

have a meeting with Bill and some staff from the 

USBR to try and resolve some of the issues.

7 Bill will send an e-mail message to the 

members of the Non-native Fish Control 

Group for the purpose of 1) electing a new 

chairman of the group, and 2) continue 

working on the recommendation process.

He has a paper that he, Rich Valdez, and Tim 

Hoffman did in 1999 and presented at the workshop 

on non-native control and feels it is a good starting 

point. He hopes the AHC can review it and add a few 

pages. He sent copies of the paper to the group but 

said he would send again if needed. He asked that 

the AHC members get with him over lunch and try and 

figure out a time for a conference call or a meeting in 

order to get a draft document ready for TWG review 

prior to the AMWG meeting in January 2003.