alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-5149

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. DAVID DARRELL DAVID, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (1:08-cr-00011-LHT-1)

Submitted: August 27, 2009 Decided: September 10, 2009

Before MICHAEL, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Claire J. Rauscher, Executive Director, Fredilyn Sison, FEDERAL DEFENDERS OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA, INC., Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Edward R. Ryan, Acting United States Attorney, Mark A. Jones, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: David Darrell David appeals the district court’s judgment entered pursuant to David’s guilty plea to failure to register as a sex offender, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2250 (2006), by failing to register in North Carolina as a sex offender. David reserved the right to appeal the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the indictment against him, and raises various arguments on appeal supporting his

contention that denial of the motion was erroneous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error in light of our recent dispositive decision in United States v. Gould , 568 F.3d 459 (4th Cir. 2009), which is neither factually nor legally distinguishable from the present case. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1949 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1949

   To suspend temporarily the duty on a certain chemical used in the 
                  formulation of HIV antiviral drugs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 3, 1998

 Mrs. Boxer (for herself and Mrs. Feinstein) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on a certain chemical used in the 
                  formulation of HIV antiviral drugs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``    9902.33.04    (R)-Propylene                                                                               
                     carbonate (CAS                                                                             
                     No. 16606-55-6)                                                                            
                     (provided for                                                                              
                     in subheading                                                                              
                     2920.90.50)....  Free              No change         No change         On or before 12/    
                                                                                             31/1999            
                                                                                                              ''

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Colorado River Basin Precipitation 

October 2000 - April 2001

0

25

50

75

100

125

150

Oct-00

Nov-00

Dec-00

Jan-01

Feb-01

Mar-01

Apr-01

Percent of Average

Colorado River Basin Precipitation

October 2000 – April 2001
Upper Colorado

Inflow Forecasts

(Mid-May 2001 Forecasts)

Flaming Gorge – 50 %

Blue Mesa – 76 %

Navajo – 122 %

Lake Powell – 72 %
2001 Upper Colorado Snowpack and

Lake Powell Inflow Forecast 

0

25

50

75

100

125

150

Nov-00

Dec-00

Jan-01

Feb-01Mar-01

Apr-01

May-01

Percent of Average

Average Snow Water

Powell Forecasted Inflow
 Lake Powell Unregulated Inflow

Water year 2001 - May 23, 2001

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

1-Oct

1-Nov

1-Dec

1-Jan

1-Feb

1-Mar

1-Apr

1-May

1-Jun

1-Jul

1-Aug

1-Sep

Cubic Feet Per Second

2001 Observed

Average Unregulated

2001 Projected

2001 Lake Powell Unregulated Inflow

Observed through May 23, projected thereafter 
Emergency Releases at Glen Canyon 

May 7, 2001 

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23

Hour

Cubic Feet Per Second

Actual Operation

Prescheduled
Glen Canyon Dam Hourly Releases

May 29 through June 30, 2001

-

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

Cubic Feet per Second

Mon - Sat

Sundays
Glen Canyon Releases - Oct 2000- Dec 2001

Based on May 2001 Final Forecast

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

18000

20000

Oct-00

Nov-00Dec-00

Jan-01

Feb-01Mar-01Apr-01

May-01

Jun-01

Jul-01

Aug-01

Sep-01

Oct-01

Nov-01Dec-01

Cubic Feet per Second

Min Probable

Max Probable

Most Probable 

Glen Canyon Releases

Based on May 2001 Final Forecast
Projected Lake Powell Water Surface Elevations

Based on May 2001 Final Forecast

3600

3620

3640

3660

3680

3700

Oct-00

Nov-00Dec-00

Jan-01

Feb-01Mar-01Apr-01

May-01

Jun-01

Jul-01

Aug-01

Sep-01

Oct-01

Nov-01Dec-01

Feet

Minimum Probable

Maximum Probable

Most Probable

Projected Lake Powell Water Surface Elevations

Based on May 2001 Final Forecast
EXHIBIT  23.2

 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We  have  issued  our  report  dated  March 21, 2001, accompanying the financial
statements  included  in the Annual Report of Amplidyne, Inc. on Form 10K-SB for
the  year  ended  December  31,  2000. We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference  of  said reports in the Registration Statements of Amplidyne, Inc. on
Forms  S-3 (File No. 333-92919, as amended by File No. 333-11015, effective date
January  18, 2000, and File No. 333-96361, effective date July 3, 2000) and Form
S-8  (File  No.  333-92915,  effective  date  December  16,  1999).

GRANT  THORNTON  LLP

Edison,  New  Jersey
March  21,  2001
EXHIBIT 24.2

                                   CERTIFICATE

     I, KENNETH J. WARREN,  hereby certify that I am the duly elected  Secretary
of Royal Precision,  Inc., a Delaware  corporation (the  "Corporation"),  and do
further certify that the following resolutions were duly adopted by the Board of
Directors of the Corporation at a meeting duly called and held on June 23, 1999,
and that such  resolutions  have not been amended or rescinded,  and are in full
force and effect:

     RESOLVED,  that each officer and director who may be required to execute an
annual report on Form 10-KSB or any amendment or supplement  thereto (whether on
behalf of the Company or as an officer or director thereof or otherwise) be, and
each of them hereby is,  authorized  to execute a power of  attorney  appointing
Richard P. Johnston and Thomas  Schneider and each of them  severally,  his true
and lawful  attorneys and agents to execute in his name, place and stead (in any
such capacity) said Form 10-KSB and all  instruments or reports  necessary or in
connection  therewith,  and to file the same with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission,  each of said  attorneys and agents to have the power to act with or
without the other,  to have full power and authority to do and to perform in the
name and on behalf of each of said officers and directors,  or both, as the case
may be, every act which is  necessary  or advisable to be done as fully,  and to
all intents and purposes,  as any such officer or director  might or could do in
person; and further ...

     Dated this 27th day of August, 1999.


                                        /s/ KENNETH J. WARREN
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Kenneth J. Warren
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.

SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Intelligroup, Inc, (the Company) on Form
10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alok Bajpai, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and to the
best of my knowledge and belief, that:

|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d);) and    
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the Company.
|   

|DATE: March 19,
      2009 | By: | /s/ Alok
      Bajpai        
|-------------------------- | --- | -----------------------------
|                           |     | Alok
      Bajpai            
|                           |     | Chief
      Financial Officer

---
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - )

)

Property 906 Roswell Glen ) ASBCA No. 62823

)

Under Contract No. DACA01-5-16-0777 )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Ms. Lisa M. Thompson

Mr. Denver M. Thompson

 Property Owners

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Michael P. Goodman, Esq.

 Engineer Chief Trial Attorney

James A. Wagoner, Esq.

 Engineer Trial Attorney

 U.S. Army Engineer District, Mobile

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: May 27, 2021

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62823, Appeal of Property 906 

Roswell Glen, rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: May 28, 2021 

JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
# C_2006276EN.01000601.xml

| 14.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 276/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 276/6

---

Lifting by France of the public service obligations for scheduled air services between Strasbourg and Munich

(2006/C 276/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

France has decided to lift the public service obligations imposed on scheduled air services between Strasbourg and Munich as published in
  Official Journal of the European Communities C 85 of 9 April 2002 and revised in the
  Official Journal of the European Communities C 257 of 25 October 2003.

Official Journal of the European Communities

Official Journal of the European Communities

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

    Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Colmena Corp. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, L. Joshua Eikov, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: November 15, 2004                          /s/ L. Joshua Eikov
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 L. Joshua Eikov
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 (Principal Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>                      
                              This Schedule contains summary financial  informa-
                              tion extracted from audited financial   statements
                              for the fiscal year ended March 31,  1998 and is
                              qualified in its entirety  by  reference to such
                              financial statements
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         823314
<NAME>                        Advanced Financial, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    United States
       
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                 APR-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                   MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                           1   
<CASH>                               58,759
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                       151,079
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     229,937
<PP&E>                             1,070,553
<DEPRECIATION>                        49,374
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     1,300,490
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              4,691,507
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                            1,815
<COMMON>                               5,836
<OTHER-SE>                        (2,957,323)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       1,300,490
<SALES>                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     257,629
<CGS>                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        633,218
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      10,992
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   156,786
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (375,589)
<INCOME-TAX>                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                        (375,589)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0.09
        



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 173 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 173

              To repeal the Federal estate and gift taxes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 2015

Mr. Thornberry (for himself, Mr. McClintock, Mr. Sessions, Mr. LaMalfa, 
Mr. Cook, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Huizenga of Michigan, Mr. Franks of Arizona, 
Mr. Olson, Ms. Granger, Mr. Lance, Mr. Conaway, Mr. Gosar, Mr. Turner, 
  Mr. Womack, Mr. Yoho, Mr. Massie, Mr. Wilson of South Carolina, Mr. 
 Jones, Mr. Culberson, Mr. Goodlatte, Mr. Bilirakis, and Mr. Miller of 
   Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
              To repeal the Federal estate and gift taxes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Death Tax Repeal Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF ESTATE AND GIFT TAXES.

    (a) In General.--Subtitle B of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to estate, gift, and generation-skipping taxes) is hereby 
repealed.
    (b) Effective Date.--The repeal made by subsection (a) shall apply 
to estates of decedents dying, gifts made, and generation-skipping 
transfers made after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2162

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to more accurately codify

the depreciable life of printed wiring board and printed wiring assembly

equipment.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 11, 1998

Mr. MACK (for himself and Mr. GRAMS) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to more accurately codify the depreciable life of printed wiring board

and printed wiring assembly equipment.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Printed Circuit Invest5 ment Act of 1998’’.
2

•S 2162 IS

1 SEC. 2. 3-YEAR DEPRECIABLE LIFE FOR PRINTED WIRING

2 BOARD AND PRINTED WIRING ASSEMBLY

3 EQUIPMENT.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A) of section

5 168(e)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating

6 to classification of property) is amended by striking ‘‘and’’

7 at the end of clause (ii), by striking the period at the end

8 of clause (iii) and inserting ‘‘, and’’, and by adding at the

9 end the following new clause:

10 ‘‘(iv) any printed wiring board or

11 printed wiring assembly equipment.’’

12 (b) 3-YEAR CLASS LIFE.—Subparagraph (B) of sec13 tion 168(g)(3) of such Code is amended by inserting after

14 the item relating to subparagraph (A)(iii) the following

15 new item:

‘‘(A)(iv) ................................................................................. 3’’.

16 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

17 this section shall apply to equipment placed in service

18 after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

RYAN BONNEAU,

Petitioner,

v. 

MARION FEATHER, et al.,

Respondent.

6:15-cv-00152-MO

ORDER

MOSMAN, Judge

Petitioner's motion to dismiss (#20) is GRANTED. This

proceeding is DISMISSED, without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this ____ day of March, 2015. 

_____________________________

Michael W. Mosman

United States District Judge

1 - ORDER

3rd /s/Michael W. Mosman

Case 6:15-cv-00152-MO Document 21 Filed 03/03/15 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7462

KEITH VINCENT BROWN, #188678,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL W. MOORE, Director of South Carolina

Department of Corrections; GERALDINE P. MIRO,

Warden of Allendale Correctional Institution,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. William B. Traxler, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-96-3750-6-21-AK)

Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: August 31, 1998

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keith Vincent Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Marvin Coleman Jones,

BOGOSLOW & JONES, Walterboro, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the

magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Brown v. Moore, No. CA-96-3750-6-21-AK (D.S.C. Sept. 29, 1997). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case 3:16-cv-00269-PK Document 250-1 Filed 06/19/18 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:16-cv-00269-PK Document 250-1 Filed 06/19/18 Page 2 of 2
#### In the Matter of Virginia Magrella, Petitioner, v Nassau County Civil Service Commission et al., Respondents.

*661There was ample basis in the record for the respondent Nassau County Civil Service Commission’s determination that the petitioner was not a bona fide resident of Nassau County. The determination is clearly supported by substantial evidence and therefore should not be disturbed *(see, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights,*45 NY2d 176).

We have reviewed the petitioner’s remaining contentions and have found them to be without merit. Lazer, J. P., Niehoff, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Integrated Cropping Systems Research: Brookings, SD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us






IPRI, International Plant Resistance to Insectsheadline bar IPRI, International Plant Resistance to Insects working group
               Previous IPRI meeting locations
               IPRI Lifetime Achievement Awards
               Next IPRI meeting April 22-25, 2024 in Tainan, Taiwan


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Davis, Appellant.

— Ordered that the judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Owens, J.), rendered January 11, 1985, is affirmed *(see, People v Harris,*61 NY2d 9; *People v Kazepis,*101 AD2d 816; *People v Morris,*118 AD2d 595; *People v McClendon,*114 AD2d 425; *People v Brown,*110 AD2d 902). Mangano, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.