alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #17119 and #17120; California Disaster Number CA-00340]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of California (FEMA-4610-DR), dated 08/24/2021. *Incident:*
                         Wildfires. *Incident Period:*
                         07/14/2021 and continuing.
 DATES: Issued on 08/24/2021. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         10/25/2021. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         05/24/2022.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 08/24/2021, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been 
                    ( print page 48793)
                    determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans):*
                     Lassen, Nevada, Placer, Plumas. *Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):* California: Butte, El Dorado, Modoc, Sacramento, Shasta, Sierra, Sutter, Tehama, Yuba. Nevada: Washoe. *The Interest Rates are:* Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
3.250Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.625Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere
5.760Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.880Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.000Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.000*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.880Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 17119 5 and for economic injury is 17120 0. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) James Rivera, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2021-18744 Filed 8-30-21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
IB 

Union Calendar No. 301 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1675 

[Report No. 114–398] 

To direct the Securities and Exchange Commission to revise its rules so 

as to increase the threshold amount for requiring issuers to provide 

certain disclosures relating to compensatory benefit plans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 26, 2015 

Mr. HULTGREN (for himself, Mr. DELANEY, Mr. FITZPATRICK, and Mr. 

POLIS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

JANUARY 28, 2016 

Additional sponsors: Mr. STIVERS, Mr. HIGGINS, Ms. SINEMA, Mr. HURT of 

Virginia, and Mr. KIND

JANUARY 28, 2016 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1675 RH

A BILL 

To direct the Securities and Exchange Commission to revise 

its rules so as to increase the threshold amount for 

requiring issuers to provide certain disclosures relating 

to compensatory benefit plans. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1675 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Encouraging Employee 

5 Ownership Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASED THRESHOLD FOR DISCLOSURES RELAT7 ING TO COMPENSATORY BENEFIT PLANS. 

8 Not later than 60 days after the date of the enact9 ment of this Act, the Securities and Exchange Commission 

10 shall revise section 230.701(e) of title 17, Code of Federal 

11 Regulations, so as to increase from $5,000,000 to 

12 $10,000,000 the aggregate sales price or amount of secu13 rities sold during any consecutive 12-month period in ex14 cess of which the issuer is required under such section to 

15 deliver an additional disclosure to investors. The Commis16 sion shall index for inflation such aggregate sales price 

17 or amount every 5 years to reflect the change in the Con18 sumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers published by 

19 the Bureau of Labor Statistics, rounding to the nearest 

20 $1,000,000. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 301 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1675 

[Report No. 114–398] 

A BILL 

To direct the Securities and Exchange Commission 

plans. disclosures relating to compensatory benefit amount for requiring issuers to provide certain to revise its rules so as to increase the threshold 

JANUARY 28, 2016 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

CHESTER E. BURNETT, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

6:15-cv-01142-CL 

ORDER 

MR. J. PREMO, et al., 

Defendants. 

AIKEN, District Judge. 

By Order (#28) entered February 22, 2016, defendants' 

motion to dismiss or in the alternative to make more definite 

and certain (#27) was allowed. Plaintiff was allowed 30 days 

to file an amended complaint and advised that failure to do so 

would result in the dismissal of this action for failure to 

prosecute. 

Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or requested 

an extension of time in which to do so. Therefore, this 

action is dismissed for failure to prosecute. 

The Clerk of Court is directed to enter a judgment 

1 - ORDER 

Case 6:15-cv-01142-CL Document 29 Filed 07/19/16 Page 1 of 2
dismissing this action. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this ~y of Jul~0167J _ 

~L~."41L Ann Aiken 

United States District Judge 

2 - ORDER 

Case 6:15-cv-01142-CL Document 29 Filed 07/19/16 Page 2 of 2
#### Delaware Farmers’ Mutual Fire Ins. Co. *vs.*Henry Knuppel.

Submitted on briefs Jan. 10, 1894.

Affirmed Jan. 18, 1894.

No. 8426.

Appeal by plaintiff, the Delaware Farmers’ Mutual Fire Insurance Company, from a judgment of the District Court of Stevens County, *Calvin L. Brown,*J., entered July 25, 1S93, in favor of the defendant, Henry Knuppel.

*J. W. Reynolds,*for appellant.

*Stephen A. Flaherty,*for respondent.

Caettt, J.

The same question considered in this case as in *Same Plaintiff*v. *Wagner, ante,*p. 240, (57 N. *W.*656.) and the opinion in that case followed. Judgment affirmed.

(Opinion published 57 N. W. Rep. 656.)
# C_2006150DE.01006401.xml

| 28.6.2006 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | C 150/64 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.6.2006

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

C 150/64

---

Berichtigung der Erläuterungen zu den Ursprungsprotokollen Paneuropa-Mittelmeer

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 16 vom 21. Januar 2006
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 16 vom 21. Januar 2006

(2006/C 150/12)

Seiten 6 und 10, Fußnote (1), letzter Satz:

1

anstatt:

„Da es für die Gemeinschaft keinen ISO-Alpha-Code gibt, können die Abkürzungen EEC, EC, CEE oder CE verwendet werden.“

muss es heißen:

„Da es für die Gemeinschaft keinen ISO-Alpha-Code gibt, können die Abkürzungen EEC, EC, CEE, CE oder EU verwendet werden.“

---
Amendment No. 4 to Amended and Restated 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan



 Exhibit 10.5 
 MODUSLINK GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, INC. 
 AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED 1995 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN 
 The Amended and Restated 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended (the “Plan”) of ModusLink Global Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation, is hereby amended by deleting all references to “CMGI,
Inc.” and substituting in lieu thereof “ModusLink Global Solutions, Inc.” 
 *********** 
  

	
	Adopted by the Board of Directors on
	September 24, 2008
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Pest Management Research: Sidney, MT
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    NPARL
                        Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory
                                    Agricultural Systems Research Unit
                                    Grasshoppers: Their Biology, Identification and ManagementSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Sidney, Montana Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory Pest Management Research PMRU Docs Grasshoppers: Their Biology, Identification and Management: Outbreak and Survey Info





- NPARL Home
- PMRU Home
- ASRU Home
- Site Highlights
- Outbreak and Survey Info
- ID Tools | Apps
- Grasshopper Management
- IPM Handbook
- USDA Research | Contact Info

Outbreak Info: 2018 Adult Grasshopper Survey Mapheadline bar  Return to Outbreak Info


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

GINA COTE, 

 Plaintiff, 

3:15-CV-00103-SI

vs. 

ORDER

CAROLYN COLVIN, 

Commissioner of Social Security, 

 Defendant. 

Based upon the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that attorney fees in the 

amount of $2816.14 shall be awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 

U.S.C. § 2412. The parties agree that attorney fees will be paid to Plaintiff’s attorney, dependent 

upon verification that Plaintiff has no debt which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, 

pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). 

If Plaintiff has no such debt, then the check shall be made out to Plaintiff’s attorney and 

mailed to Plaintiff’s attorney’s office as follows: Merrill Schneider, P.O. Box 14490, Portland, 

OR 97293. If Plaintiff has a debt, then the check for any remaining funds after offset of the debt 

shall be made to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff's attorney's office at the address stated above. 

DATED this _____ day of ___________________, 2016. 

_______________________________ 

Michael Simon 

United States District Court Judge 

16th February

/s/ Michael H. Simon

Case 3:15-cv-00103-SI Document 25 Filed 02/16/16 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                JUL-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                       1 
<CASH>                                            13528 
<SECURITIES>                                          0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                   1249381 
<ALLOWANCES>                                     450281 
<INVENTORY>                                     1741215 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                3182509 
<PP&E>                                          1090481 
<DEPRECIATION>                                   362216 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  4063763 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           2060505 
<BONDS>                                               0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0 
<PREFERRED>                                     1500002 
<COMMON>                                         231536 
<OTHER-SE>                                         (237)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    4063763 
<SALES>                                         1079982 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                1079982 
<CGS>                                            957498 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    957498 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 6514 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (917089)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (917089)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0 
<CHANGES>                                             0 
<NET-INCOME>                                    (917089)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.04) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0 
                                                        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 170 (Tuesday, September 7, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 50099]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19197]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EF21-9-000]

Western Area Power Administration; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on August 27, 2021, Western Area Power 
Administration submitted tariff filing: Formula Rates for Western Area 
Power Administration--Rate Order No. WAPA-197, to be effective 10/1/
2021.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments, 
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link 
at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically may mail 
similar pleadings to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426. Hand delivered submissions in 
docketed proceedings should be delivered to Health and Human Services, 
12225 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the 
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an 
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the 
internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://ferc.gov) using the 
``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three 
digits in the docket number field to access the document. At this time, 
the Commission has suspended access to the Commission's Public 
Reference Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National Emergency 
concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), issued by the 
President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission at [email protected] or call toll-free, 
(886) 208-3676 or TYY, (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on September 27, 2021.

    Dated: August 31, 2021.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-19197 Filed 9-3-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
#### Shirley Rigberg, Respondent, v Allan Rigberg, Appellant.

In determining the appropriate amount of a temporary *724maintenance award, the court’s primary consideration is to accommodate the reasonable needs of the spouse seeking support and the financial ability of the other spouse to meet those needs (Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [6] [a]; *Colin v Colin,*113 AD2d 817; *Chachkes v Chachkes,*107 AD2d 786). Here, the defendant was directed to continue to pay the carrying charges on the marital residence, an apartment in Manhattan, and a house in East Hampton, which are by statutory definition marital property *(see,*Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [1] [c]). Since there are two residences available to adequately accommodate the separate housing needs of each spouse, the alternative temporary maintenance award of $600 per week in the event the plaintiff resides elsewhere is inappropriate. Such an award would merely serve to deplete the defendant’s income, rendering him unable to adequately meet his own maintenance needs and support payments for his children from a prior marriage *(see, Colin v Colin,*113 AD2d 817, *supra).*

Lastly, we reject the defendant’s contention that Special Term’s directive to pay specific carrying charges on the marital residence and the East Hampton house is invalid on the ground that the monetary limits of the defendant’s obligation are not fixed. Payments directed in a pendente lite order, as opposed to a final judgment *(see, Rogers v Rogers,*116 AD2d 710; *cf. Price v Price,*113 AD2d 299, 308-309), do not represent open-ended obligations *(Rainone v Rainone,*118 AD2d 766; *see, e.g., Ruffolo v Ruffblo,*114 AD2d 843; *Catania v Catania,*111 AD2d 896). Mangano, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Spatt, JJ., concur.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N NO. 03-11-00355- CR Carlton Eugene Scott, Appellant

v. The State of Texas, App ellee F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 403 RD JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -DC- 11- 2019 48, H ONO RAB LE B RENDA P . K ENNEDY, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant pled guilty to att em p t ing to tamper with evidenc e and was sentenc ed to six ty day s in the county

jail. T he trial court has cer tified both that the cause is a plea- barg ain ca se an d t h at appellant waived his rig ht of appeal. Thus, the appeals are dismiss ed. See Tex . R . Ap p . P. 25.2(d).

__________________________________________ David Pury ear , J ustice Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Pemberton and Rose Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: Jul y

1, 2011 Do Not Publish
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yf i nds thi s c a s e s ui t abl e f

orde c i s i on w i thout ** o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). JT / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T R OD OL F O R OX AS GE R ON I MO; V ERO N I CA M A N G U ERRA GE R ON I MO, P et i t i o n ers, v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 06- 75391 A ge nc yN os . A 070- 142- 040

A 070- 142- 041 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d N ove m be r17, 2009 ** B efo re: A L A R C Ó N , T R O T T , an dT A S H IM A , C i rcu i tJu d g es. R odol f o R oxa s G e r oni m o, a nd hi s w i f e , V e r oni c aM a ngue rr aG e r oni m o, na t i ve s a nd c i t i z e ns of

the P hi l i ppi ne s , pe t i t i on f orr e vi e w of

the B oa r d of 

# FI LED

JAN 05 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSJ T / Res ea r ch 06- 75391 2 Im m ig ra ti o n A p p ea ls’ o rd erd ism issin g th eir ap p ea l fro m an im m ig ra ti o n ju d g e’s deci si on denyi ng thei r app l i ca t i on for a sy l um . W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w f o rs u b s tan tia l e v id e n c e , Li m v . I NS , 224 F . 3d 929, 9 3 3 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 0 ) , a n dwe d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. S ub st ant i alevi dence s up po rt s the agency’ s det erm i nat i on thatpet i t i on er s f a ile dto e s tab lis h p a s t p e r s e c u tio n b e c au s e th e th r e a ts th e yr e c e iv e dd idn o t r is e to th e le v e l o f

p e r s e c u tio n . Se e id . a t936. S ubs t a nt i a l e vi de nc e f urthe rs upport s the agency ’ s deni alof as ylum because pet i t i on er s f ai l ed t o est abl i sh thatthe N ew P e o p le ’s A rm yth r e a te n e dth e m o n a c c o u n t o f ap r o te c te dg r o u n d , se e B ol shakov v. I NS , 1 3 3 F .3 d1 2 7 9 , 1 2 8 0 - 8 2 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 8 ) , a n df a ile dto e s tab lis h th e in c id e n ts i n v o l v i n g th e i rs o n a n dth e i re mp l o y e e s w e r e c o n n e c t e dt o th e i ro w n p r o b l e ms w ith th e N e w P e o p le ’s A rm y , s e e Arr i a g a - Ba rr i e n to s v . I NS , 937 F . 2d 411, 414 (9th C i r. 19 91 ) ( re qu i ri ng thatany patt ern o f per se cut i on agai nstfam i l y m em bers be “ c l os e l yt i e d t o the pe t i t i one r ” ) . F i na l l y , s ubs t a nt i a l e vi de nc e s upport s the a ge nc y ’ s f

i ndi ng tha tpe t i t i one r s di d notde m ons tr a t e tha tthe P hi l i ppi ne g o v e rn m e n t w a s u n w illin g o ru n ab le to c o n tr o l th e irp e r s e c u to r s . See N ah rv an iv. G on zales , 399 F . 3d 1148, 1154 ( 9th C i r . 2005) . A c c or di ngl y , pe t i t i one r s ’ a s y l um c la im f a ils . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.