# L_2009075EN.01001501.xml

| 21.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 75/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 75/15

---

COMMISSION DECISION

of 19 March 2009

excluding from Community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) and under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF)

(notified under document number C(2009) 1945)

(Only the Danish, Dutch, English, French, Greek, Italian, Slovenian and Spanish texts are authentic)

(2009/253/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the financing of the common agricultural policy (1), and in particular Article 7(4) thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 of 21 June 2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy (2), and in particular Article 31 thereof,

Having consulted the Committee on the Agricultural Funds,

Whereas:

| (1) | Under Article 7(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999, and Article 31 of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005, the Commission is to carry out the necessary verifications, communicate to the Member States the results of these verifications, take note of the comments of the Member States, initiate a bilateral discussion so that an agreement may be reached with the Member States in question, and formally communicate its conclusions to them. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Under Article 7(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999, and Article 31 of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005, the Commission is to carry out the necessary verifications, communicate to the Member States the results of these verifications, take note of the comments of the Member States, initiate a bilateral discussion so that an agreement may be reached with the Member States in question, and formally communicate its conclusions to them.

| (2) | The Member States have had an opportunity to request the launch of a conciliation procedure. That opportunity has been used in some cases and the report issued on the outcome has been examined by the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Member States have had an opportunity to request the launch of a conciliation procedure. That opportunity has been used in some cases and the report issued on the outcome has been examined by the Commission.

| (3) | Under Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 and Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005, only agricultural expenditure which has been incurred in a way that has not infringed Community rules may be financed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Under Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 and Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005, only agricultural expenditure which has been incurred in a way that has not infringed Community rules may be financed.

| (4) | In the light of the verifications carried out, the outcome of the bilateral discussions and the conciliation procedures, part of the expenditure declared by the Member States does not fulfil this requirement and cannot, therefore, be financed under the EAGGF Guarantee Section and the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund, hereinafter referred to as EAGF. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

In the light of the verifications carried out, the outcome of the bilateral discussions and the conciliation procedures, part of the expenditure declared by the Member States does not fulfil this requirement and cannot, therefore, be financed under the EAGGF Guarantee Section and the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund, hereinafter referred to as EAGF.

| (5) | The amounts that are not recognised as being chargeable to the EAGGF Guarantee Section and the EAGF should be indicated. Those amounts do not relate to expenditure incurred more than twenty-four months before the Commission’s written notification of the results of the verifications to the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

The amounts that are not recognised as being chargeable to the EAGGF Guarantee Section and the EAGF should be indicated. Those amounts do not relate to expenditure incurred more than twenty-four months before the Commission’s written notification of the results of the verifications to the Member States.

| (6) | As regards the cases covered by this Decision, the assessment of the amounts to be excluded on grounds of non-compliance with Community rules was notified by the Commission to the Member States in a summary report on the subject. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

As regards the cases covered by this Decision, the assessment of the amounts to be excluded on grounds of non-compliance with Community rules was notified by the Commission to the Member States in a summary report on the subject.

| (7) | This Decision is without prejudice to any financial conclusions that the Commission may draw from the judgments of the Court of Justice in cases pending on 6 January 2009 and relating to its content, |
| --- | --- |

(7)

This Decision is without prejudice to any financial conclusions that the Commission may draw from the judgments of the Court of Justice in cases pending on 6 January 2009 and relating to its content,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The expenditure itemised in the Annex hereto that has been incurred by the Member States’ accredited paying agencies and declared under the EAGGF Guarantee Section or under the EAGF shall be excluded from Community financing because it does not comply with Community rules.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Belgium, Kingdom of Denmark, Ireland, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Slovenia and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Done at Brussels, 19 March 2009.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 103.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 209, 11.8.2005, p. 1.

2

---

ANNEX

Budget item 6 7 0 1

| MS | Measure | FY | Reason for correction | Type | % | Currency | Amount | Deductions already made | Financial impact |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| BE | Export refunds — Sugar and isoglucose | 2004 | Insufficient quantity of laboratory controls of sugar. | forfaitaire | 2,00 | EUR | –2 752 373,87 | 0,00 | –2 752 373,87 |
| BE | Export refunds — Sugar and isoglucose | 2005 | Insufficient quantity of laboratory controls of sugar. | forfaitaire | 2,00 | EUR | –3 348 166,37 | 0,00 | –3 348 166,37 |
| BE | Export refunds — Sugar and isoglucose | 2006 | Insufficient quantity of laboratory controls of sugar. | forfaitaire | 2,00 | EUR | –1 096 253,86 | 0,00 | –1 096 253,86 |
| BE | Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes | 2005 | Ineligible expenditure comprising environmental packaging and VAT | ponctuelle | | EUR | –1 189 054,23 | 0,00 | –1 189 054,23 |
| BE | Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes | 2006 | Ineligible expenditure including environmental packaging and VAT | ponctuelle | | EUR | – 535 735,88 | 0,00 | – 535 735,88 |
| TOTAL BE | –8 921 584,21 | 0,00 | –8 921 584,21 |
| CY | Wine — Restructuring | 2005 | Overpayments of amounts to individual producers | ponctuelle | | CYP | –2 094,55 | 0,00 | –2 094,55 |
| TOTAL CY | –2 094,55 | 0,00 | –2 094,55 |
| DK | Arable Crops | 2003 | Weakness in the control of the compliance with set-aside areas | forfaitaire | 5,00 | DKK | –16 820 597,23 | 0,00 | –16 820 597,23 |
| DK | Arable Crops | 2003 | Weakness in the control of the compliance with set-aside areas | forfaitaire | 10,00 | DKK | –48 235 864,52 | 0,00 | –48 235 864,52 |
| DK | Arable Crops | 2003 | Weakness in the control of the compliance with set-aside areas | forfaitaire | 5,00 | DKK | – 180 971 473,05 | 0,00 | – 180 971 473,05 |
| DK | Arable Crops | 2004 | Weakness in key-control: remote sensing. | forfaitaire | 2,00 | DKK | –6 594 611,09 | 0,00 | –6 594 611,09 |
| DK | Arable Crops | 2004 | Weakness in the control of the compliance with set-aside areas | forfaitaire | 5,00 | DKK | – 199 488 578,07 | 0,00 | – 199 488 578,07 |
| DK | Arable Crops | 2004 | Weakness in the control of the compliance with set-aside areas | forfaitaire | 10,00 | DKK | –48 736 215,92 | 0,00 | –48 736 215,92 |
| DK | Arable Crops | 2005 | Weakness in key-control: remote sensing. | forfaitaire | 2,00 | DKK | –1 987 122,96 | 0,00 | –1 987 122,96 |
| DK | Arable Crops | 2005 | Weakness in the control of the compliance with set-aside areas | forfaitaire | 5,00 | DKK | – 201 721 301,02 | 0,00 | – 201 721 301,02 |
| DK | Arable Crops | 2005 | Weakness in the control of the compliance with set-aside areas | forfaitaire | 10,00 | DKK | –45 156 517,78 | 0,00 | –45 156 517,78 |
| TOTAL DK | – 749 712 281,64 | 0,00 | – 749 712 281,64 |
| ES | Fruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing | 2005 | Non-recognitnion of one of the producers' organisation criterion. | ponctuelle | | EUR | –78 111,82 | 0,00 | –78 111,82 |
| ES | Fruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing | 2006 | Non-recognitnion of one of the producers' organisation criterion. | ponctuelle | | EUR | –79 222,56 | 0,00 | –79 222,56 |
| ES | Fruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing | 2007 | Non-recognitnion of one of the producers' organisation criterion. | ponctuelle | | EUR | –39 411,30 | 0,00 | –39 411,30 |
| ES | Meat Premiums — Ewe and Goats | 2003 | Updated calculation of correction based on the new financial data obtained | ponctuelle | | EUR | –2 415,00 | 0,00 | –2 415,00 |
| ES | Meat Premiums — Ewe and Goats | 2004 | Updated calculation of correction based on the new financial data obtained | ponctuelle | | EUR | – 102 075,02 | 0,00 | – 102 075,02 |
| ES | Meat Premiums — Ewe and Goats | 2005 | Updated calculation of correction based on the new financial data obtained | ponctuelle | | EUR | –95 914,93 | 0,00 | –95 914,93 |
| TOTAL ES | – 397 150,63 | 0,00 | – 397 150,63 |
| FR | Irregularities | | Reimbursment due to erroneous application of the 50/50 rule | | | EUR | 265 473,73 | 0,00 | 265 473,73 |
| FR | Food Aid within the Community | 2005 | Failure to meet payment deadlines. Absence of sanctions. | forfaitaire | 2,00 | EUR | – 959 937,85 | 0,00 | – 959 937,85 |
| FR | Food Aid within the Community | 2005 | Failure to meet payment deadlines. Absence of sanctions. | ponctuelle | | EUR | – 148 951,85 | 0,00 | – 148 951,85 |
| FR | Food Aid within the Community | 2006 | Failure to meet payment deadlines. Absence of sanctions. | forfaitaire | 2,00 | EUR | – 838 194,08 | 0,00 | – 838 194,08 |
| FR | Food Aid within the Community | 2006 | Failure to meet payment deadlines. Absence of sanctions. | ponctuelle | | EUR | – 340 621,43 | 0,00 | – 340 621,43 |
| TOTAL FR | –2 022 231,48 | 0,00 | –2 022 231,48 |
| GB | Export Refunds | 2003 | Risk analysis not used properly — reduction of control rate not justified | forfaitaire | 5,00 | GBP | – 890 012,69 | 0,00 | – 890 012,69 |
| GB | Export Refunds | 2004 | Risk analysis not used properly — reduction of control rate not justified; Insufficient certification of exit from Community | forfaitaire | 5,00 | GBP | –2 291 169,57 | 0,00 | –2 291 169,57 |
| GB | Export Refunds | 2004 | Non-Annex I goods — insufficient verification of recipes | forfaitaire | 10,00 | GBP | –43 131,68 | 0,00 | –43 131,68 |
| GB | Export Refunds | 2005 | Risk analysis not used properly — reduction of control rate not justified; Insufficient certification of exit from Community | forfaitaire | 5,00 | GBP | –3 395 655,55 | 0,00 | –3 395 655,55 |
| GB | Export Refunds | 2005 | Non-Annex I goods — insufficient verification of recipes | forfaitaire | 10,00 | GBP | –68 291,82 | 0,00 | –68 291,82 |
| GB | Export Refunds | 2006 | Risk analysis not used properly — reduction of control rate not justified; Insufficient certification of exit from Community | forfaitaire | 5,00 | GBP | –2 291 169,57 | 0,00 | –2 291 169,57 |
| GB | Export Refunds | 2006 | Non-Annex I goods — insufficient verification of recipes | forfaitaire | 10,00 | GBP | –68 291,82 | 0,00 | –68 291,82 |
| GB | Export Refunds | 2007 | Risk analysis not used properly — reduction of control rate not justified | forfaitaire | 5,00 | GBP | – 247 225,73 | 0,00 | – 247 225,73 |
| TOTAL GB | –9 294 948,43 | 0,00 | –9 294 948,43 |
| GR | Export refunds — Non-Annex I | 2004 | Insufficient controls. Risk of ineligible payments. Unreliable data on quantities of sugar exported. | forfaitaire | 10,00 | EUR | – 160 378,12 | 0,00 | – 160 378,12 |
| GR | Export refunds — Non-Annex I | 2005 | Insufficient controls. Risk of ineligible payments. Unreliable data on quantities of sugar exported. | forfaitaire | 10,00 | EUR | – 104 574,50 | 0,00 | – 104 574,50 |
| GR | Export refunds — Non-Annex I | 2006 | Insufficient controls. Risk of ineligible payments. Unreliable data on quantities of sugar exported. | forfaitaire | 10,00 | EUR | –10 276,40 | 0,00 | –10 276,40 |
| GR | Export refunds — Sugar and isoglucose | 2004 | Insufficient controls. Risk of ineligible payments. Unreliable data on quantities of sugar exported. | forfaitaire | 10,00 | EUR | – 838 787,30 | 0,00 | – 838 787,30 |
| GR | Export refunds — Sugar and isoglucose | 2005 | Insufficient controls. Risk of ineligible payments. Unreliable data on quantities of sugar exported. | forfaitaire | 10,00 | EUR | –99 948,50 | 0,00 | –99 948,50 |
| GR | Export refunds — Sugar and isoglucose | 2006 | Insufficient controls. Risk of ineligible payments. Unreliable data on quantities of sugar exported. | forfaitaire | 10,00 | EUR | –69 462,90 | 0,00 | –69 462,90 |
| TOTAL GR | –1 283 427,72 | 0,00 | –1 283 427,72 |
| IE | Export Refunds & Food Aid outside the UE | 2003 | Weaknesses in risk analysis. Insufficient quality and quantity of physical checks. | forfaitaire | 2,00 | EUR | – 824 680,26 | 0,00 | – 824 680,26 |
| IE | Export Refunds & Food Aid outside the UE | 2004 | Weaknesses in risk analysis. Insufficient quality and quantity of physical checks. | forfaitaire | 2,00 | EUR | – 916 724,78 | 0,00 | – 916 724,78 |
| IE | Export Refunds & Food Aid outside the UE | 2005 | Weaknesses in risk analysis. Insufficient quality and quantity of physical checks. | forfaitaire | 2,00 | EUR | – 653 050,12 | 0,00 | – 653 050,12 |
| IE | Export Refunds & Food Aid outside the UE | 2006 | Weaknesses in risk analysis. Insufficient quality and quantity of physical checks. | forfaitaire | 2,00 | EUR | –46 017,73 | 0,00 | –46 017,73 |
| TOTAL IE | –2 440 472,89 | 0,00 | –2 440 472,89 |
| IT | Other Direct Aid — Silk Worms | 2004 | Insufficient administrative controls of aid applications and not satisfactory control of minimum weight | forfaitaire | 5,00 | EUR | – 226,54 | 0,00 | – 226,54 |
| IT | Other Direct Aid — Silk Worms | 2005 | Insufficient administrative controls of aid applications and not satisfactory control of minimum weight | forfaitaire | 5,00 | EUR | –1 632,44 | 0,00 | –1 632,44 |
| IT | Other Direct Aid — Silk Worms | 2006 | Insufficient administrative controls of aid applications and not satisfactory control of minimum weight | forfaitaire | 5,00 | EUR | – 857,69 | 0,00 | – 857,69 |
| IT | Other Direct Aid — Silk Worms | 2007 | Insufficient administrative controls of aid applications and not satisfactory control of minimum weight | forfaitaire | 5,00 | EUR | –1 625,77 | 0,00 | –1 625,77 |
| TOTAL IT | –4 342,44 | 0,00 | –4 342,44 |
| SI | Direct Payments | 2005 | Deficiencies in key-controls: incorrect control approach, technique and tools. | forfaitaire | 5,00 | SIT | – 175 559 567,33 | 0,00 | – 175 559 567,33 |
| SI | Direct Payments | 2006 | Deficiencies in key-controls: incorrect control approach, technique and tools. | forfaitaire | 5,00 | SIT | – 180 027 349,79 | 0,00 | – 180 027 349,79 |
| TOTAL SI | – 355 586 917,12 | 0,00 | – 355 586 917,12 |

MS

Measure

FY

Reason for correction

Type

%

Currency

Amount

Deductions already made

Financial impact

BE

Export refunds — Sugar and isoglucose

2004

Insufficient quantity of laboratory controls of sugar.

forfaitaire

2,00

EUR

–2 752 373,87

0,00

–2 752 373,87

BE

Export refunds — Sugar and isoglucose

2005

Insufficient quantity of laboratory controls of sugar.

forfaitaire

2,00

EUR

–3 348 166,37

0,00

–3 348 166,37

BE

Export refunds — Sugar and isoglucose

2006

Insufficient quantity of laboratory controls of sugar.

forfaitaire

2,00

EUR

–1 096 253,86

0,00

–1 096 253,86

BE

Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes

2005

Ineligible expenditure comprising environmental packaging and VAT

ponctuelle

EUR

–1 189 054,23

0,00

–1 189 054,23

BE

Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes

2006

Ineligible expenditure including environmental packaging and VAT

ponctuelle

EUR

– 535 735,88

0,00

– 535 735,88

TOTAL BE

–8 921 584,21

0,00

–8 921 584,21

CY

Wine — Restructuring

2005

Overpayments of amounts to individual producers

ponctuelle

CYP

–2 094,55

0,00

–2 094,55

TOTAL CY

–2 094,55

0,00

–2 094,55

DK

Arable Crops

2003

Weakness in the control of the compliance with set-aside areas

forfaitaire

5,00

DKK

–16 820 597,23

0,00

–16 820 597,23

DK

Arable Crops

2003

Weakness in the control of the compliance with set-aside areas

forfaitaire

10,00

DKK

–48 235 864,52

0,00

–48 235 864,52

DK

Arable Crops

2003

Weakness in the control of the compliance with set-aside areas

forfaitaire

5,00

DKK

– 180 971 473,05

0,00

– 180 971 473,05

DK

Arable Crops

2004

Weakness in key-control: remote sensing.

forfaitaire

2,00

DKK

–6 594 611,09

0,00

–6 594 611,09

DK

Arable Crops

2004

Weakness in the control of the compliance with set-aside areas

forfaitaire

5,00

DKK

– 199 488 578,07

0,00

– 199 488 578,07

DK

Arable Crops

2004

Weakness in the control of the compliance with set-aside areas

forfaitaire

10,00

DKK

–48 736 215,92

0,00

–48 736 215,92

DK

Arable Crops

2005

Weakness in key-control: remote sensing.

forfaitaire

2,00

DKK

–1 987 122,96

0,00

–1 987 122,96

DK

Arable Crops

2005

Weakness in the control of the compliance with set-aside areas

forfaitaire

5,00

DKK

– 201 721 301,02

0,00

– 201 721 301,02

DK

Arable Crops

2005

Weakness in the control of the compliance with set-aside areas

forfaitaire

10,00

DKK

–45 156 517,78

0,00

–45 156 517,78

TOTAL DK

– 749 712 281,64

0,00

– 749 712 281,64

ES

Fruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing

2005

Non-recognitnion of one of the producers' organisation criterion.

ponctuelle

EUR

–78 111,82

0,00

–78 111,82

ES

Fruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing

2006

Non-recognitnion of one of the producers' organisation criterion.

ponctuelle

EUR

–79 222,56

0,00

–79 222,56

ES

Fruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing

2007

Non-recognitnion of one of the producers' organisation criterion.

ponctuelle

EUR

–39 411,30

0,00

–39 411,30

ES

Meat Premiums — Ewe and Goats

2003

Updated calculation of correction based on the new financial data obtained

ponctuelle

EUR

–2 415,00

0,00

–2 415,00

ES

Meat Premiums — Ewe and Goats

2004

Updated calculation of correction based on the new financial data obtained

ponctuelle

EUR

– 102 075,02

0,00

– 102 075,02

ES

Meat Premiums — Ewe and Goats

2005

Updated calculation of correction based on the new financial data obtained

ponctuelle

EUR

–95 914,93

0,00

–95 914,93

TOTAL ES

– 397 150,63

0,00

– 397 150,63

FR

Irregularities

Reimbursment due to erroneous application of the 50/50 rule

EUR

265 473,73

0,00

265 473,73

FR

Food Aid within the Community

2005

Failure to meet payment deadlines. Absence of sanctions.

forfaitaire

2,00

EUR

– 959 937,85

0,00

– 959 937,85

FR

Food Aid within the Community

2005

Failure to meet payment deadlines. Absence of sanctions.

ponctuelle

EUR

– 148 951,85

0,00

– 148 951,85

FR

Food Aid within the Community

2006

Failure to meet payment deadlines. Absence of sanctions.

forfaitaire

2,00

EUR

– 838 194,08

0,00

– 838 194,08

FR

Food Aid within the Community

2006

Failure to meet payment deadlines. Absence of sanctions.

ponctuelle

EUR

– 340 621,43

0,00

– 340 621,43

TOTAL FR

–2 022 231,48

0,00

–2 022 231,48

GB

Export Refunds

2003

Risk analysis not used properly — reduction of control rate not justified

forfaitaire

5,00

GBP

– 890 012,69

0,00

– 890 012,69

GB

Export Refunds

2004

Risk analysis not used properly — reduction of control rate not justified; Insufficient certification of exit from Community

forfaitaire

5,00

GBP

–2 291 169,57

0,00

–2 291 169,57

GB

Export Refunds

2004

Non-Annex I goods — insufficient verification of recipes

forfaitaire

10,00

GBP

–43 131,68

0,00

–43 131,68

GB

Export Refunds

2005

Risk analysis not used properly — reduction of control rate not justified; Insufficient certification of exit from Community

forfaitaire

5,00

GBP

–3 395 655,55

0,00

–3 395 655,55

GB

Export Refunds

2005

Non-Annex I goods — insufficient verification of recipes

forfaitaire

10,00

GBP

–68 291,82

0,00

–68 291,82

GB

Export Refunds

2006

Risk analysis not used properly — reduction of control rate not justified; Insufficient certification of exit from Community

forfaitaire

5,00

GBP

–2 291 169,57

0,00

–2 291 169,57

GB

Export Refunds

2006

Non-Annex I goods — insufficient verification of recipes

forfaitaire

10,00

GBP

–68 291,82

0,00

–68 291,82

GB

Export Refunds

2007

Risk analysis not used properly — reduction of control rate not justified

forfaitaire

5,00

GBP

– 247 225,73

0,00

– 247 225,73

TOTAL GB

–9 294 948,43

0,00

–9 294 948,43

GR

Export refunds — Non-Annex I

2004

Insufficient controls. Risk of ineligible payments. Unreliable data on quantities of sugar exported.

forfaitaire

10,00

EUR

– 160 378,12

0,00

– 160 378,12

GR

Export refunds — Non-Annex I

2005

Insufficient controls. Risk of ineligible payments. Unreliable data on quantities of sugar exported.

forfaitaire

10,00

EUR

– 104 574,50

0,00

– 104 574,50

GR

Export refunds — Non-Annex I

2006

Insufficient controls. Risk of ineligible payments. Unreliable data on quantities of sugar exported.

forfaitaire

10,00

EUR

–10 276,40

0,00

–10 276,40

GR

Export refunds — Sugar and isoglucose

2004

Insufficient controls. Risk of ineligible payments. Unreliable data on quantities of sugar exported.

forfaitaire

10,00

EUR

– 838 787,30

0,00

– 838 787,30

GR

Export refunds — Sugar and isoglucose

2005

Insufficient controls. Risk of ineligible payments. Unreliable data on quantities of sugar exported.

forfaitaire

10,00

EUR

–99 948,50

0,00

–99 948,50

GR

Export refunds — Sugar and isoglucose

2006

Insufficient controls. Risk of ineligible payments. Unreliable data on quantities of sugar exported.

forfaitaire

10,00

EUR

–69 462,90

0,00

–69 462,90

TOTAL GR

–1 283 427,72

0,00

–1 283 427,72

IE

Export Refunds & Food Aid outside the UE

2003

Weaknesses in risk analysis. Insufficient quality and quantity of physical checks.

forfaitaire

2,00

EUR

– 824 680,26

0,00

– 824 680,26

IE

Export Refunds & Food Aid outside the UE

2004

Weaknesses in risk analysis. Insufficient quality and quantity of physical checks.

forfaitaire

2,00

EUR

– 916 724,78

0,00

– 916 724,78

IE

Export Refunds & Food Aid outside the UE

2005

Weaknesses in risk analysis. Insufficient quality and quantity of physical checks.

forfaitaire

2,00

EUR

– 653 050,12

0,00

– 653 050,12

IE

Export Refunds & Food Aid outside the UE

2006

Weaknesses in risk analysis. Insufficient quality and quantity of physical checks.

forfaitaire

2,00

EUR

–46 017,73

0,00

–46 017,73

TOTAL IE

–2 440 472,89

0,00

–2 440 472,89

IT

Other Direct Aid — Silk Worms

2004

Insufficient administrative controls of aid applications and not satisfactory control of minimum weight

forfaitaire

5,00

EUR

– 226,54

0,00

– 226,54

IT

Other Direct Aid — Silk Worms

2005

Insufficient administrative controls of aid applications and not satisfactory control of minimum weight

forfaitaire

5,00

EUR

–1 632,44

0,00

–1 632,44

IT

Other Direct Aid — Silk Worms

2006

Insufficient administrative controls of aid applications and not satisfactory control of minimum weight

forfaitaire

5,00

EUR

– 857,69

0,00

– 857,69

IT

Other Direct Aid — Silk Worms

2007

Insufficient administrative controls of aid applications and not satisfactory control of minimum weight

forfaitaire

5,00

EUR

–1 625,77

0,00

–1 625,77

TOTAL IT

–4 342,44

0,00

–4 342,44

SI

Direct Payments

2005

Deficiencies in key-controls: incorrect control approach, technique and tools.

forfaitaire

5,00

SIT

– 175 559 567,33

0,00

– 175 559 567,33

SI

Direct Payments

2006

Deficiencies in key-controls: incorrect control approach, technique and tools.

forfaitaire

5,00

SIT

– 180 027 349,79

0,00

– 180 027 349,79

TOTAL SI

– 355 586 917,12

0,00

– 355 586 917,12

---