alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OFCRIMINAL APPEALS OFTEXAS

P O BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

OFFICIAL BUSINESS

STATE OF TEXAS

PENALTY FOR

PRIVATE USE

12/17/2014

LINDECAMP, JED SAMUEL

3TOHP PITNEY BOWES

$ 00.26s

DEC 18 2014

02 1M .

0004279596

^MAILED FROM Z"WfP-&2,^07-01

The Court has dismissed your application for writ ofhabeas corpus without written

order; the sentence has been discharged? Ste,Exparte Harrington, 310 S.W.3d

452 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010).

Abel Acosta, Clerk

'•N3B' 7B2'Ol

JED SAMUEL LINDECAMP

315 FRY STREET

#2

DENTON, TX 76201

AN K

Iii-"--Iimii-jiTf^iliMfilIv1ll"li:l»JMll""ITr"l-i-»l.t-,i"i.I1i-
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 4, 2017

No. 04

- 16

- 00751

- CV

THE UNITED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL

. , Appellant

v.

U.S. TRAILER RELOCATORS, LLC

,

Appellee

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016

- TXA

- 000111

- D1 Honorable Elma T. Salinas Ender, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

A filing fee of $205 was due when this appeal was filed, but it was not paid. See Tex. Sup. Ct., Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, In Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and

Before the Judicial Panel on Multi

- District Litigation , Docket No. 15

- 9158 (Aug. 28, 2015). The clerk of the court notified appellant of this deficiency, and requested paym ent of the fee. The fee remains unpaid, and appellant has not filed an affidavit of indigence.

We therefore order appellant, by January 10, 2017, either: (1) pay the filing fee; or (2) provide written proof to this court that he is indigent or otherwise excused by statute or the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure from prepaying fees and costs. See Tex. R. App . P. 20.1 (providing that indigent party who complies with provisions of that rule may proceed without advance payment of costs).

If appellant fa ils to respond satisfactorily within the time ordered, this appeal will be

dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (providing appellate courts may enforce rule requiring payment of costs “by any order that is just”); R. 42.3 (permitting appellate courts to dismis s an appeal when appellant fails totality of the circumstance comply with a court order).

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 4th day of January, 2017

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
# L_2009040EN.01003701.xml

| 11.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 40/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 40/37

---

COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION

of 10 February 2009

concerning the discharge to be given to the Commission in respect of the implementation of the operations of the European Development Fund (Ninth EDF) for the financial year 2007

(2009/114/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement, signed in Cotonou on 23 June 2000 (1) and amended by the Agreement signed in Luxembourg on 25 June 2005 (2),

Having regard to the Internal Agreement on the financing and administration of Community aid under the Financial Protocol to ACP-EC Partnership Agreement (3), hereinafter referred to as the ‘Internal Agreement’, setting up, amongst others, the Ninth European Development Fund (Ninth EDF), and in particular Article 32(3) thereof,

Having regard to the Financial Regulation of 27 March 2003 applicable to the Ninth European Development Fund (4), and in particular Articles 96 to 103 thereof,

Having examined the revenue and expenditure account and the balance sheet relating to the operations of the Ninth EDF as at 31 December 2007 and the Court of Auditors′ report concerning the financial year 2007 together with the Commission's replies (5),

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 32(3) of the Internal Agreement, the discharge for the financial management of the Ninth EDF is to be given to the Commission by the European Parliament on the recommendation of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 32(3) of the Internal Agreement, the discharge for the financial management of the Ninth EDF is to be given to the Commission by the European Parliament on the recommendation of the Council.

| (2) | The overall implementation by the Commission of the operations of the Ninth EDF during the financial year 2007 has been satisfactory, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The overall implementation by the Commission of the operations of the Ninth EDF during the financial year 2007 has been satisfactory,

HEREBY RECOMMENDS that the European Parliament give the Commission a discharge in respect of the implementation of the operations of the Ninth EDF for the financial year 2007.

Done at Brussels, 10 February 2009.

For the Council

The President

M. KALOUSEK

---

(1)  
  OJ L 317, 15.12.2000, p. 3.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 287, 28.10.2005, p. 4.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 317, 15.12.2000, p. 355.

3

(4)  
  OJ L 83, 1.4.2003, p. 1.

4

(5)  
  OJ C 286, 10.11.2008, p. 273.

5

---
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**STATEMENT
      OF**


**PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING
      OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








I,
      James
      G. Loofbourrow, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2005 of Entrada Networks,
      Inc. fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2005 of Entrada
      Networks, Inc fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of Entrada Networks, Inc.








/s/
                James G. LoofbourrowName:
                James G. LoofbourrowDate: June
                18, 2005
2013 Overflight Wrapup

Philip A. Davis
Low‐flow maximum daily progression

X Basestations not used

Daily extend of basestation operations

Day 2

Day 3

Day 4

X

X

X

X

X

Day 1

basestationcoverage

Day 3 basestation coverage

Day 4 basestation coverage

Day 2 basestation coverage

Day 5

basestationcoverage

Day 6basestationcoverage

GPS Rim Basestation Operations during Overflights
D

Day 2

Day 3

Day 4

Flight Weather:Every day windy – 20‐30 knot gusts;only day 3 had scattered clouds over G block

Day 2 collectedJ, K, & parts of L blo

10 AM ‐3 PM

Day 3 – 2 planes collectedremaining M & L blocksand H, I, F blocks; some reflights

of previous lines (turbulence)

10 AM – 3 PM

Day 4 – 2 planes collected remainingF block, and B, C, E, & part of G blocks;

some reflights of previous lines (turbulence)

Day 5 – 2 planes collected A, D, 10 AM – 3 PM

& part of G blocks; some reflights

of previous lines (turbulence)

9:30 AM (only A block) , 10 AM – 3 PM

Day 6 – 2 planes collected all of

G blocks and remaining H blocks‐

repetitive collections of lines.

10 AM – 3 PM (although only11 AM – 1 PM data will be used)

All data collected in 6 days without any delays, except for reflights of certai

due to turbulence (which produced image smears).
Total Cost of the 2013 Overflight/Data Processing

Overflight 2013 Net Cost Gross Cost

Fugro EarthData Collection 433,256 482,339

Ground Target Panels 2,393 2,664

M. Dennis & 6 GPS receivers 24,800 27,610Thumb drives, AC adapters, batteries 1,202 1,338

Basestation Payments to non‐govt Personnel:

Matt Kaplinski 1,400 1,559

Rob Weber 2,865 3,190

Geoff Chain 2,718 3,025

Dan Hamill 2,400 2,672

Karen Koestner 1,200 1,336

Govt vehicle costs not yet 

OVERALL TOTAL 472,233 525,732
# L_2009257EN.01004001.xml

| 30.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 257/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 257/40

---

POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION EUSEC/1/2009

of 25 September 2009

on the appointment of the Head of Mission for the European Union mission to provide advice and assistance for security sector reform in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (EUSEC RD Congo)

(2009/723/CFSP)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 25 thereof,

Having regard to Council Joint Action 2009/709/CFSP of 15 September 2009 on the European Union mission to provide advice and assistance for security sector reform in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (EUSEC RD Congo) (1), and in particular Article 8 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 8 of Joint Action 2009/709/CFSP the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee (PSC) to take subsequent decisions regarding the appointment of the Head of Mission. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 8 of Joint Action 2009/709/CFSP the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee (PSC) to take subsequent decisions regarding the appointment of the Head of Mission.

| (2) | On 24 June 2008, Jean-Paul MICHEL was appointed Head of Mission for the EUSEC RD Congo. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 24 June 2008, Jean-Paul MICHEL was appointed Head of Mission for the EUSEC RD Congo.

| (3) | The Secretary-General/High Representative has proposed to appoint again Jean-Paul MICHEL as the Head of Mission for EUSEC RD Congo, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Secretary-General/High Representative has proposed to appoint again Jean-Paul MICHEL as the Head of Mission for EUSEC RD Congo,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Jean-Paul MICHEL is hereby appointed Head of Mission for the European Union mission to provide advice and assistance for security sector reform in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (EUSEC RD Congo).

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on 1 October 2009.

Done at Brussels, 25 September 2009.

For the Political and Security Committee

The Chairperson

O. SKOOG

---

(1)  
  OJ L 246, 18.9.2009, p. 33.

1

---
Exhibit 32.6

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      The  undersigned  hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
Geodyne Energy Income Limited  Partnership II-F ("Issuer") for the period ending
December 31, 2006 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 16th day of April, 2007.

                                GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                PARTNERSHIP II-F
                                ("Issuer")

                                //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                -----------------------------------
                                Dennis R. Neill
                                President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                -----------------------------------
                                Craig D. Loseke
                                Chief Accounting Officer
                                (Chief Financial Officer)
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Invasive Plant Research Laboratory: Fort Lauderdale, FL
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Outreach
                        Volunteer
                                    Outreach Activities 2019
                                    Outreach Activities 2020
                                    Outreach Activities 2022
                    K.I.N.D. GardenSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Fort Lauderdale, Florida Invasive Plant Research Laboratory People & Locations







Miriam  Gaeta
                        Invasive Plant Research Laboratory

                        




                        
                        Biological Aid (Plants)
                        Phone: 954475654
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### PHILLIPS v. BROOKLYN HEIGHTS R. CO.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.

December 2, 1895.)

Action by Thomas H. Phillips, as administrator, etc., against the Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Texas-New Mexico Power Company, Relator

Appellate case number: 01-18-01075-CV

Trial court case number: 2017-64096

Trial court: 234th District Court of Harris County

On December 6, 2018, relator, Texas-New Mexico Power Company, filed a petition 

for a writ of mandamus seeking to compel the respondent district judge to vacate his 

October 8, 2018 order denying relator’s motion to dismiss for subject matter jurisdiction 

without prejudice and to compel respondent to enter an order of dismissal for want of 

subject-matter jurisdiction for relator. Relator has included an appendix with its petition. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k), 52.7.

With the petition, relator also filed an opposed “Motion for Stay Pending Ruling on 

Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Mandamus” seeking a temporary stay of the underlying 

trial court proceeding, pending disposition of this petition. Relator’s motion contains the 

required certificate of compliance. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(a).

Accordingly, the Court grants the relator’s motion and ORDERS that the 

underlying trial court proceeding is stayed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b). This stay is 

effective until the petition in this Court is finally decided or this Court otherwise orders the 

stay lifted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b). Any party may file a motion for reconsideration 

of the stay. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(c).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: __/s/ Laura C. Higley____

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: _December 7, 2018___
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 13, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

131101 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. MARKHAM GENERAL INSURANCE Stephen J. Markman, COMPANY, Subrogee of ALL MAKES Justices LOGISTICS, LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 131101 COA: 257284 Calhoun CC: 04-000681-NO NATHANIEL MORRIS EVANS, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 23, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

C AVANAGH and K ELLY , JJ., concur in the denial of leave to appeal except that they would vacate that portion of the Court of Appeals judg ment that erroneously equates the plaintiff’s voluntar y waiver of its policy’ s property damage cov erage deductible with an acknowledgement that the deductible loss paid was “cov ered by insuran ce” within the meaning of MCL 500.3135(3)(e).

p1107 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 13, 2006

Clerk
<PAGE>


                             DYNAMARK CORPORATION



                                   FORM 10-K



                    For the fiscal year ended July 31, 1996





                                   EXHIBITS



<PAGE>

                                 Exhibit 10.3


                             DYNAMARK CORPORATION
                                 56 Dune Road
                        Atlantic Beach, New York 11909





Mr. Allan P. Rothstein
56 Dune Road
Atlantic Beach, New York  11905

Dear Mr. Rothstein:

                This shall confirm our agreement to extend your Employment
Agreement dated August 1, 1996 to August 1, 1997 upon the same terms and
conditions as presently in effect. Kindly confirm your agreement by signing
below where indicated.

                                            DYNAMARK CORPORATION

                                            By: /s/ALLAN P. ROTHSTEIN
-----------------------------
                Allan P. Rothstein, Secretary


Agreed to as of the 30th day
of July, 1996



/s/ALLAN P. ROTHSTEIN
---------------------
Allan P. Rothstein
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INTERIM
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND BALANCE SHEET AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q COMMUNICATIONS & POWER
INDUSTRIES HOLDING CORPORATION FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JANUARY 1, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001000654
<NAME> COMMUNICATIONS & POWER INDUSTRIES HOLDING CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-01-1999
<CASH>                                           1,482
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,632
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     57,400
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               109,057
<PP&E>                                          78,027
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 232,339
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           70,616
<BONDS>                                        124,723
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           21,527
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                         545
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   232,339
<SALES>                                         57,781
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                57,781
<CGS>                                           43,654
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   43,654
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,066
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,406
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,005)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (422)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (583)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (583)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.1  Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  I, Bernard Charlès,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Dassault Systèmes, a société anonyme organized under French law
(DASSAULT SYSTEMES), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge, that:  (i)the
Annual Report of Dassault Systèmes on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
31 December 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and  (ii)the
information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of Dassault
Systèmes.  This certification will
not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.
This certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
except to the extent that Dassault Systèmes specifically incorporates it by
reference.  Date: April 4, 2008  By:
  /s/ BERNARD CHARLÈSName:
  Bernard CharlèsTitle:
  President and Chief Executive Officer


Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  I, Thibault de Tersant,
Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Dassault
Systèmes, a société anonyme
organized under French law (Dassault Systèmes), certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:  (i)the
Annual Report of Dassault Systèmes on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
31 December 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and  (ii)the
information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of Dassault
Systèmes.  This certification will
not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
except to the extent that Dassault Systèmes specifically incorporates it by
reference.  Date: April 4, 2008  By:
  /s/ THIBAULT DE TERSANTName:
  Thibault de TersantTitle:
  Senior Executive Vice President and Chief
  Financial Officer