alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

        <S> <C>
<PAGE>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K/A
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>    1,000

<S>                            <C>              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                               19,100
<SECURITIES>                        101,704
<RECEIVABLES>                        18,294
<ALLOWANCES>                            671
<INVENTORY>                          20,137
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    170,893
<PP&E>                               19,738
<DEPRECIATION>                       32,368
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      236,400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                34,283
<BONDS>                                 110
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                                 55
<OTHER-SE>                          201,255
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        236,400
<SALES>                              65,348
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     86,456
<CGS>                                34,577
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        40,920
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     49,726      <F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       32
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (32,862)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (32,862)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                       (32,862)
<EPS-BASIC>                        (0.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                        (0.71)      <F2>

<FN>
<F1>  Item consists of research and development.
<F2>  Item consists of basic earnings per share.
</FN>



</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 3:15-cv-00085-MA 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

$63,784.11 in UNITED STATES 

CURRENCY, in rem, 

Defendant. 

MARSH, Judge. 

ORDER 

Plaintiffs motion to lift stay and for voluntary dismissal (ECF No. 12) is GRANTED. This 

proceeding is DISMISSED, without prejudice. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATEDthis ·--:, dayofSeptember,2015. 

/It~ ~m~ Makolm F. Marsh 

United States District Judge 

1-0RDER 

Case 3:15-cv-00085-MA Document 13 Filed 09/03/15 Page 1 of 1
Glen Canyon Dam Technical Work Group Meeting

April 20-21, 1999

List of Attachments

No. Title Author / Presenter

1 Kanab ambersnail Workshop report Bill Persons

2 Basin Hydrology Randy Peterson

3 Biological River Restoration - articles Rick Johnson

4 AMP Guiding Document Scott Loveless

5 FY 2001 Budget Barry Gold

6 Floods and Sandbars in the Grand Canyon - article Bruce Moore
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 11

               STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE LOSS


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                               Three Months   Three Months    Six Months     Six Months
                                   Ended          Ended         Ended          Ended
                              June 30, 1998  June 30, 1997  June 30, 1998  June 30, 1997
                              -------------  -------------  -------------  -------------
                              <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>

Net loss-Limited Partners          $  0           $  0           $  0          $  0
                                   ====           ====           ====          ====
Average Class A and B units
  outstanding                       921            921            921           921
                                   ====           ====           ====          ====

Net loss per Class A and B 
  unit                             $  0           $  0           $  0          $  0
                                   ====           ====           ====          ====
</TABLE>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Range Management Research: Las Cruces, NM
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Comprehensive Publications
                    Research SummarySearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Las Cruces, New Mexico Range Management Research Docs





- Landscape Toolbox
- Long Term Agricultural Research
- EcoTrends
- Long Term Ecological Research
- Ecological Site Descriptions
- Monitoring & Assessment
- Southwest Climate Hub
- Land Potential Knowledge System
- National Ecological Observatory Network
- JournalMap
- Assessment, Inventory, and Monitoring (AIM)
- Data Catalogs

Existing Spatial Dataheadline bar    Go to top of page     Go to top of page


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### Grace E. Weinberg et al., Appellants, v City of New York et al., Respondents.

[945 NYS2d 758]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Plug, J.), dated February 17, 2011, as granted the separate motions of the de*737fendants City of New York, Consolidated Edison Company, TriMessine Construction, Co., and Safeway Construction Enterprises, Inc., which were for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.

The plaintiff Grace E. Weinberg (hereinafter the injured plaintiff) allegedly was injured when she fell in a sink hole in the southbound travel lane of 67th Avenue in Queens. The injured plaintiff, and her husband, suing derivatively, commenced this action to recover damages against the defendants City of New York, Consolidated Edison Company (hereinafter Con Ed), Tri-Messine Construction, Co. (hereinafter TriMessine), and Safeway Construction Enterprises, Inc. (hereinafter Safeway). Con Ed had previously hired Tri-Messine and Safeway to perform work on the roadway.

The City made a prima facie showing of its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that it did not have prior written notice of the allegedly defective condition involved in the injured plaintiffs accident (see *Cendales v City of New York,*25 AD3d 579, 580-581 [2006]). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact because they offered only speculation that the City affirmatively created the alleged roadway defect (see *Lawler v City of Yonkers,*45 AD3d 813 [2007]).

The defendants Tri-Messine and Safeway established their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that they did not create the alleged defect in the travel lane of the roadway which allegedly caused the injured plaintiff to fall (see *Cendales v City of New York,*25 AD3d at 580-581; *Shvartsberg v City of New York,*19 AD3d 578, 579 [2005]; *Palone v City of New York,*5 AD3d 750, 751 [2004]). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see *Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320 [1986]).

Since Con Ed’s alleged liability was based upon its hiring of the defendants Tri-Messine and Safeway, it also was entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the separate motions of the City, Con Ed, Tri-Messine, and Safeway for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them. Skelos, J.P., Leventhal, Belen and Roman, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 170 (Tuesday, September 7, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 50099]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19196]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EF21-8-000]


Western Area Power Administration; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on August 27, 2021, Western Area Power 
Administration submitted tariff filing: Extension of Western Area Power 
Administration Formula Rates--Rate Order No. WAPA-196, to be effective 
10/1/2021.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments, 
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link 
at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically may mail 
similar pleadings to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426. Hand delivered submissions in 
docketed proceedings should be delivered to Health and Human Services, 
12225 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the 
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an 
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the 
internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://ferc.gov) using the 
``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three 
digits in the docket number field to access the document. At this time, 
the Commission has suspended access to the Commission's Public 
Reference Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National Emergency 
concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), issued by the 
President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#387e7d6a7b77565451565d6b4d4848574a4c785e5d4a5b165f574e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="662023342529080a0f080335131616091412260003140548010910">[email protected]</span></a> or call toll-free, 
(886) 208-3676 or TYY, (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on September 27, 2021.

    Dated: August 31, 2021.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-19196 Filed 9-3-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### WHITCOMB, Respondent, v. POSTAL TELEGRAPH CABLE CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fifth Department.

December 28, 1895.)

Action by Edwin E. Whit-comb, as administrator, etc., against the Postal Telegraph Cable Company.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed.
# C_2006146EN.01000801.xml

| 22.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 146/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 146/8

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(2006/C 146/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

Date of adoption of the decision:

Member State: United Kingdom (Northern Ireland)

Aid No: N 190a/2005

Title: Modification of the Climate Change Levy (C18/2001)

Objective: The measure enlarges the right to conclude voluntary climate change agreements (and thus to benefit from the existing system of climate change tax reduction) to the companies of all sectors

with an at least 12 % energy intensity, or

with an energy intensity of 3 % to 12 % if the import penetration ratio of the sector is of at least 50 % or the export to production ratio of the sector is of at least 30 %.

In that framework, the decision covers the new climate change agreements with the British Compressed Gases Association and the Kaolin and Ball Clay Association.

Legal basis: Finance Act 2000

Budget: Around GBP 25 million/year

Duration: Until 31 March 2011

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/

Date of adoption of the decision:

Member State: Belgium

Aid No: N 604/03

Title: Aid for the reclassification of employees made redundant by firms undergoing restructuring

Objective: Promotion of an active reclassification policy

Legal basis: Loi-programme du 22 décembre 2003/Programmawet van 22 december 2003

Budget: EUR 25 million in 2004, EUR 50 million in 2005

Aid intensity or amount: Maximum repayment of reclassification costs of EUR 1 800 per employee; maximum reduction in employees' contributions of EUR 1 200 per employee; maximum reduction in employers' contributions of EUR 1 200 per employee;

Duration: Pilot project

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/

---
Exhibit 32.2



Certification



Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) I have reviewed the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.  (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;

(2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(3) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.

|By:    | Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation                         
|------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------
|       | General Partner                                                   
|       |                                                                   
|       | /S/ Kelly Tucek                                                   
|       |                                                                   
|Name:  | Kelly Tucek                                                       
|Title: | Vice President of the General Partner and                         
|       | principal financial officer of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.
|Date:  | March 23, 2005
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2212

To amend title V of the Trade Act of 1974 to include unwrought titanium

as an article that may not be designated as an eligible article under

the Generalized System of Preferences.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 24, 1998

Mr. REID (for himself and Mr. BRYAN) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend title V of the Trade Act of 1974 to include

unwrought titanium as an article that may not be designated as an eligible article under the Generalized System of Preferences.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF UNWROUGHT TITANIUM FOR

4 GENERALIZED SYSTEM OF PREFERENCES.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 503(b)(1) of the Trade

6 Act of 1974, (19 U.S.C. 2463) is amended—

7 (1) by redesignating subparagraph (G) as sub8 paragraph (H); and
2

•S 2212 IS

1 (2) by inserting after subparagraph (F) the fol2 lowing new subparagraph:

3 ‘‘(G) Unwrought titanium products de4 scribed in subheading 8108.10.50 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedules of the United States

6 as in effect on July 1, 1998.’’.

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

8 this section shall apply with respect to articles entered,

9 or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, after the

10 date of this Act.

Æ
Order entered February 22, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00243-CV

IN RE TIMOTHY SCOTT HARRIMAN, Relator

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F94-01553-ML

ORDER

The Court has before it relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. The Court requests that 

real party in interest and respondent file any responses by March 4, 2013.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES 

JUSTICE
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT 

FILED

SEP 04 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

CRISELDA ROMERO-MANZANO,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

CARLTON NURSERY COMPANY, 

LLC and CARLTON PLANTS, LLC, 

DBA Carlton Plants,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 16-35750

D.C. No. 3:15-cv-00508-BR

U.S. District Court for Oregon, 

Portland

MANDATE

The judgment of this Court, entered August 13, 2018, takes effect this date. 

This constitutes the formal mandate of this Court issued pursuant to Rule 

41(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. 

FOR THE COURT:

MOLLY C. DWYER

CLERK OF COURT

By: Jessica F. Flores Poblano

Deputy Clerk

Ninth Circuit Rule 27-7

Case 3:15-cv-00508-BR Document 58 Filed 09/04/18 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

Consent of Independent Auditors




The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Core Technologies (Pennsylvania), Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No's.
33-25536 and 33-57972) on Form S-8 of Core Technologies (Pennsylvania), Inc.
of our reports dated March 1, 1996 relating to the consolidated balance
sheets of Core Technologies (Pennsylvania), Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1995 and 1994 and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' deficit, and cash flows and related schedule for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1995, which
reports are included in the December 31, 1995 annual report on Form 10-K of
Core Technologies (Pennsylvania), Inc.


KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 27, 1996
# C_2005251EN.01000701.xml

| 11.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 251/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 251/7

---

Notification by the Republic of Latvia concerning visa reciprocity (1)

1

(2005/C 251/10)

The Permanent Representation of the Republic of Latvia to the EU presents its compliments to the Secretariat General of the Council of the European Union and has the honour to bring to their attention the following issue.

Becoming a Member State of the European Union, Latvia unilaterally introduced visa-free regime for the citizens of the Federative Republic of Brazil in accordance with EU Council Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement.

Pursuant to Article 2 of EU Council Regulation (EC) No 851/2005 amending Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement as regards the reciprocity mechanism, Latvia would like to notify the Council and the Commission that the Federative Republic of Brazil continue to apply unilateral visa regime to the citizens of the Republic of Latvia.

Taking into consideration the abovementioned and in accordance with the solidarity mechanism provided by Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 and Regulation (EC) No 851/2005 amending Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 for achieving full reciprocity in respect to all Member States, Latvia believes that appropriate measures have to be taken in order to assure that all EU citizens may enter the territory of the Federative Republic of Brazil under equal conditions.

The Permanent Representation of the Republic of Latvia to the EU avails itself of this opportunity to renew to the Secretariat General of the Council of the European Union assurances of its highest consideration.

---

(1)  This notification is published in conformity with Article 2 of Council Regulation (EC) No 851/2005 of 2 June 2005 (OJ L 141, 4.6.2005, p. 3) amending Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 of 15 March 2001 (OJ L 81, 21.3.2001, p. 1).

1

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, the undersigned Jack (J.D.) Draper, President and Chief Executive Officer of FIRSTPLUS Financial Group, Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: 

 

1.             The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

| Dated:  November 21, 2005 | /s/ Jack (J.D.) Draper |
|---------------------------|------------------------|

Jack (J.D.) Draper

President and Chief Executive Officer

Principal Executive Officer