alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Noni Gordon, Respondent, v Dmitriy Goldin, Appellant.

[944 NYS2d 318] —

In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Hepner, J.), dated June 24, 2011, as granted the mother’s petition for sole custody of the subject child with certain visitation to him.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

In resolving custody and visitation disputes, the paramount concern is the best interests of the child *(see Eschbach v Eschbach,*56 NY2d 167 [1982]; *Friederwitzer v Friederwitzer,*55 NY2d 89 [1982]; *Matter of Harry v Harry,*92 AD3d 883 [2012]; *Matter of Awan v Awan,*63 AD3d 733 [2009]). The Family Court’s determination of custody and visitation disputes is largely dependent upon an assessment of the credibility of the parties, and those credibility determinations are generally accorded deference on appeal. The determination should not be disturbed unless it lacks a sound and substantial basis in the record *(see Matter of Cordero v DeLeon,*92 AD3d 943 [2012]; *Matter of Harry v Harry,*92 AD3d at 883-884; *Matter of Awan v Awan,*63 AD3d 733 [2009]).

Contrary to the father’s contention, the Family Court properly considered the totality of the circumstances in determining that the best interests of the subject child would be served by awarding sole custody of the child to the mother *(see Eschbach v Eschbach,*56 NY2d 167 [1982]; *Gonzalez v Gonzalez,*17 AD3d 635, 636 [2005]), with extensive visitation to the father pursuant to a schedule set forth by the court *(see Matter of Bassuk v Bassuk,*93 AD3d 664 [2012]). The Family Court’s determination is supported by the record, including the testimony of the parties. Since the Family Court’s determination has a sound and substantial basis in the record, it will not be disturbed *(see Matter of Cordero v DeLeon,*92 AD3d 943 [2012]; *Matter of Harry v Harry,*92 AD3d at 883-884; *Matter of Duran v Sutherland,*86 AD3d 539 [2011]; *Matter of Awan v Awan,*63 AD3d 733 [2009]).

The father’s remaining contentions are without merit. Dillon, J.E, Florio, Lott and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 10-Q FOR
THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                               6
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     6
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       6
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                3
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           3
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         6
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        2
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (2)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (2)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (2)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1


                                WRITTEN STATEMENT
                                       OF
               CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



     The undersigned hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
the quarter ended  September 30, 2003 filed by Technology  Flavors & Fragrances,
Inc.  with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
and that information  contained in the report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.




Dated:  November 7, 2003       /s/   Philip Rosner
                               -------------------------------------------------
                                     Philip Rosner
                                     Chairman and Chief Executive Officer




Dated:  November 7, 2003       /s/   Joseph A. Gemmo
                               -------------------------------------------------
                                     Joseph A. Gemmo
                                     Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<CIK>                              0000851724
<NAME>                             GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LTD PARTNERSHIP II-G
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                       DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                              1,564,325
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                         710,336
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    2,274,661
<PP&E>                             25,132,939
<DEPRECIATION>                     19,895,857
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      7,635,720
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 193,011
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                          7,378,600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        7,635,720
<SALES>                             4,670,245
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    5,934,813
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       5,647,364
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       287,449
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   287,449
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                          287,449
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            0.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0
        


</TABLE>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Manhattan, Kansas (NBAF)
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Manhattan, Kansas (NBAF) People & Locations







Alison  Cook
                        Manhattan, Kansas (NBAF)

                        




                        
                        Animal Caretaker
                        Phone: (785) 712-3368
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
DRAFT 02/08/01 - Cliff Barrett

GCDAMP Budget Protocols and the Federal Budget Process

Principles

• Management Objectives, Information Needs, and Strategic Plan drive the budget process

• Assumes AMWG meets in January and July

• Assumes TWG meets in January, March, May, July, September, and November

CY 

Month

Current Year (2001) Budget Year (2002) Budget Year + 1 & 2 (2003-2004)

Jan

2001

GCMRC & USBR provide update on 

fund availability and planned program 

to AMWG and TWG

GCMRC provides prior year (2000) 

actuals

AMWG reviews major program elements 

and adopts budget for recommendation to 

Secretary, and prepares budget support 

plan

GCMRC & USBR provide TWG 

Budget Group preliminary planning 

documents for BY +1-2 (2003-2004)

Feb AMWG carries out budget support plan TWG Budget Group reviews and 

comments to GCMRC & USBR on BY 

+1-2

Mar GCMRC & USBR report on CY 

progress and suggest change if 

needed

GCMRC & USBR update TWG on status of 

fund request

GCMRC provides TWG on update on RFP 

for BY program

TWG reviews and comments to 

GCMRC & USBR on BY +1-2

Apr AMWG carries out budget support

May (same as March) (same as March & April) GCMRC & USBR update TWG on BY 

+1-2 planning

Jun AMWG carries out budget support

Jul (same as March) (same as March & April) TWG & AMWG review Strategic Plan, 

CY progress, BY status of funding, 

and RFP progress

TWG recommends to AMWG major 

programs and funding levels for 

BY +1 and out years
CY 

Month

Current Year (2001) Budget Year (2002) Budget Year + 1 & 2 (2003-2004)

Jul

AMWG adopts recommendation to 

Secretary on BY +1

Aug GCMRC & USBR report status of BY 

+1 work plans to TWG Budget Group

Sep (same as March) GCMRC & USBR provide TWG status of 

BY funding and discuss any adjustments 

that may be required due to level of 

funding available

GCMRC provides update on RFPs 

including results of RFP where available

TWG reviews progress in addressing 

Information Needs and research 

accomplishments.

TWG reviews status of BY and BY +1 

and makes recommendations to 

USBR & GCMRC on BY +2 program 

activities and funding level

Oct

(2001)

Begin new fiscal year – CY becomes prior year (PY2001), BY becomes CY (2002) and BY+1 becomes BY (2003)

 (2002) (2003) (2004-2005)

Nov

(2001)

GCMRC provides TWG summary of 

prior year (2001) accomplishment

GCMRC reports on CY progress

GCMRC/USBR provide TWG with update 

on finalized program, including any 

adjustments due to changes in level of 

fund request

TWG makes recommendation to GCMRC & 

USBR on BY program and funding levels

Dec

(2001)

GCMRC/USBR provide BY (2003) program 

to AMWG and TWG for consideration at 

the January meeting.
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Caraustar Industries, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending
December 31, 2001 as submitted
for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Thomas V. Brown, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

|                     |  |                                                      
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 28, 2003 |  |                                                      
|                     |  |                                                      
|                     |  | /s/ Thomas V. Brown                                  
|                     |  |                                                      
|                     |  | Thomas V. Brown
President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to Caraustar
Industries, Inc. and will be retained by Caraustar Industries, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JUAN ARELLANO,

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-18-00097-CR

Appeal from the

Criminal District Court No. 1

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20150D05071)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS Angie Morales’ request for an extension of time within which to file 

the Reporter’s Record until January 17, 2019. NO FURTHER REQUESTS FOR EXTENSION 

OF TIME TO FILE THE REPORTER’S RECORD WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS 

COURT.

It is further ORDERED that Angie Morales, Official Court Reporter for Criminal District 

Court No. 1 for El Paso County, Texas, prepare the Reporter’s Record and forward the same to 

this Court on or before January 17, 2019.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 4

th day of December, 2018.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
#### John R. McGrath *v.*Domenic Palanzo

*Raphael Korff,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

No appearance for the appellee (defendant).

Argued March 4

decided March 4, 1975

The plaintiff’s “Motion to Sustain Appeal” from the Court of Common Pleas in Fairfield County is denied and the appeal is dismissed, it not having been taken from a final judgment.
* Judge Murnaghan participated in the consideration of this

case, but died prior to the time the decision was filed. The

decision is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

46(d).

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6233

TONY D. LANKFORD,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director, Department of

Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-99-1436-AM)

Submitted: June 27, 2000 Decided: September 12, 2000

Before MURNAGHAN,* NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tony D. Lankford, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s order is signed and date

stamped on January 10, 2000, the district court’s records show that

it was entered on the docket sheet on January 12, 2000. Pursuant

to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it

is the date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we

take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See

Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Tony D. Lankford appeals the district court’s order dismissing

his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

2000) without prejudice for failure to comply with a district court

order to submit a $5 filing fee or seek leave to proceed in forma

pauperis. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Finding no abuse of discretion in the district court’s dismissal, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Lankford v. Angelone, No. CA-99-1436-AM (E.D. Va.

Jan. 12, 2000).* We note, however, that Lankford may be able to

file a Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion in the district court, in which

he may offer proof of excusable neglect for failing to timely

comply with the district court’s order. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the amended Annual Report of Caraustar Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31,
2002 as submitted for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael J. Keough, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: January 14, 2005



/s/ Michael J. KeoughMichael J. Keough, President and Chief Executive Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

September 21, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00527

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF Y .L.C.

, a Child

From the 111th Judicial District Court

, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10028

Honorable Hugo Martinez , Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK

OF JURISDICTION. No costs of appeal shall be assessed against the Office of the Attorney

General.

It is so ORDERED on September 21, 2016

.

_____________________________ Jason Pulliam , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 21st day of September, 2016

.

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
DUANE A. BOSWORTH, OSB #825077 

duanebosworth@dwt.com 

DEREK D. GREEN, OSB #042960 

derekgreen@dwt.com 

DA VIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 

1300 S.W. Fifth Avenue, Suite 2400 

Portland, Oregon 97201-5610 

Telephone: (503) 241-2300 

Facsimile: (503) 778-5299 

CAMERON STRACHER (admitted pro hac vice) 

cam@stracherlaw.com 

4 New York Plaza, 2d Floor 

New York, NY 10004 

Telephone: (212) 743-6513 

Facsimile: (646) 810-3089 

Attorneys for Defendants 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

AT PORTLAND 

CONSUMER CELLULAR, 

INCORPORATED, an Oregon corporation, 

Case No. 3:15-cv-01908-PK 

Plaintiff, STIPULATED JUDGMENT OF 

DISMISSAL 

v. 

CONSUMERAFFAIRS.COM, INC., a Nevada 

corporation; CONSUMERS UNIFIED, LLC, a 

Nevada limited liability company; and DAVID 

ZACHARY CARMAN, 

Defendants. 

Based upon the stipulation of the parties hereto that this action has been fully 

compromised and settled, and that they hereby stipulate to dismissal with prejudice of all 

plaintiffs claims against defendants, it is hereby 

Page I - STIPULATED JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL 

4822-9268-2329v. l 0105455-000001 

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 

1300 S.W. Fifth Avenue, Suite 2400 

Portland, Oregon 97201-5610 

(503) 241-2300 main· (503) 778-5299 fax 
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed with prejudice and without 

attorney fees or costs awarded to any party. 

DATEDthis ~ dayofDecember,2017. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED: 

KELL, ALTERMAN & RUNSTEIN, L.L.P 

By: s/ Robert B. Lowry 

THOMAS R. RASK, III, OSB #934031 

trask@kelrun.com 

ROBERT B. LOWRY, OSB #852751 

rlowry@kelrun.com 

KELL, ALTERMAN & RUNSTEIN, L.L.P. 

520 SW Yamhill St., Suite 600 

Portland, OR 97204-1329 

Telephone: (503) 222-3531 

Facsimile: (503) 227-2980 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Hon. Anna J. Brown 

United States District Court Judge 

DA VIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 

By s/Duane A. Bosworth 

DUANE A. BOSWORTH, OSB #825077 

duanebosworth@dwt.com 

Telephone: (503) 241-2300 

Facsimile: (503) 778-5299 

CAMERON STRACHER 

(admitted pro hac vice) 

cam@stracherlaw.com 

4 New York Plaza, 2d Floor 

New York, NY 10004 

Telephone: (212) 743-6513 

Facsimile: (646) 810-3089 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Page 2 - STIPULATED JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL 

4822-9268-2329v. l 0105455-000001 

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 

1300 S.W. Fifth Avenue, Suite 2400 

Portland, Oregon 97201-5610 

(503) 241-2300 main· (503) 778-5299 fax