alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32(b)**

 

**Assisted Housing Fund L.P. I**

**Certification of the PrincipalAccounting Officer of the General Partner**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Brett J.Atkinson, Principal Accounting Officer of Murphey Favre Properties, Inc.,General Partner of Assisted Housing Fund L.P. I,  does hereby certify that this report on Form 10-K fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 and that the information contained in this report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations ofthe Investor Partnership.

 
| By:    | Murphey Favre Properties,  Inc.               |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | *General Partner*                             |   |
|   |                                          |   |
|   |                                          |   |
| By:    | /s/ Brett J. Atkinson                         |   | Date: | March 30 2004 |   |
|   | Brett J. Atkinson                             |   |
|   | Treasurer and *Principal  Accounting Officer* |   |
|        |                                               |        |  |  |  |

 

----
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Range Management Research: Las Cruces, NM
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Comprehensive Publications
                    Research SummarySearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Las Cruces, New Mexico Range Management Research Docs





- Landscape Toolbox
- Long Term Agricultural Research
- EcoTrends
- Long Term Ecological Research
- Ecological Site Descriptions
- Monitoring & Assessment
- Southwest Climate Hub
- Land Potential Knowledge System
- National Ecological Observatory Network
- JournalMap
- Assessment, Inventory, and Monitoring (AIM)
- Data Catalogs

Webinarsheadline bar The videos listed are available for viewing. These videos are in Adobe Flash format and will require a flash player availabe for free at http://www.adobe.com. In some cases the videos are also available as Windows Media Videos (wmv). Using the Rangeland Assessment and Monitoring Methods Guide - broadcast on April 6, 2010.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Page 1 -- DECLARATION OF GREG LOCKWOOD IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT

Greg Lockwood, OSB 114415

HITT HILLER MONFILS WILLIAMS LLP

411 SW Second Avenue, Suite 400

Portland, OR 97204

Telephone: (503) 228-8870

Facsimile: (503) 228-4250

E-mail Address: glockwood@hittandhiller.com

Of Attorneys for Robert West

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

PORTLAND DIVISION

ROBERT LEE WEST 

Plaintiff,

v.

MAYOR HALES, CHIEF OF POLICE REESE, 

and 150 OFFICERS,

 Defendants.

Case No. 3:15-cv-00715-ST

DECLARATION OF GREG LOCKWOOD 

IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 

FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE 

AN AMENDED COMPLAINT

I, Greg Lockwood, hereby make the following declaration pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746. I 

make this declaration on personal knowledge and, if called upon to do so, I could and would

competently testify to the following matters. 

1. I am the appointed attorney for Robert West and I received my appointment from this court 

on June 24, 2015.

2. Since accepting an appointment, I had a jury trial in Multnomah County Circuit court on July 

6 and 7. I also had an arbitration on July 15. In the past few weeks, I had several other cases with 

deadlines for motions. 

3. All of these things have limited the time that I have been able to dedicate to rewriting 

plaintiff’s complaint.

Case 3:15-cv-00715-ST Document 14 Filed 07/16/15 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 -- DECLARATION OF GREG LOCKWOOD IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT

4. For the past few weeks, I have been in communication with representatives from the City 

of Portland to discuss settlement. I believe that there may be an opportunity to resolve this 

matter without litigation. And, Mr. West would like me to investigate those avenues. 

5. For the foregoing reasons, a 45-day extension to September 4, 2015 is warranted and

would provide me with the time needed to further investigate settlement and prepare the 

complaint, if necessary.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

DATED: July 16, 2015. HITT HILLER MONFILS WILLIAMS LLP

By: /s/ Greg Lockwood

 Greg Lockwood, OSB No. 114415

 Attorney for Plaintiff

Case 3:15-cv-00715-ST Document 14 Filed 07/16/15 Page 2 of 2
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2016021EN.01008801.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 28.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 21/88 |

---

Corrigendum to Directive 2009/67/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on the installation of lighting and light-signalling devices on two or three-wheel motor vehicles

(
[Official Journal of the European Union L 222 of 25 August 2009](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2009_222_R_TOC)
)

On page 66, Annex V, point 6.12.1:

for:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘6.12.1. | Number: one Class IA (1).’ |

read:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘6.12.1. | Number: two Class IA (1).’. |

---
II

Calendar No. 557

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2139

[Report No. 105–318]

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade for the vessel YESTERDAYS DREAM.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE, 5, 1998

Mr. THURMOND introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

SEPTEMBER 9, 1998

Reported by Mr. MCCAIN, without amendment

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

YESTERDAYS DREAM.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 2139 RS

1 SECTION 1. CERTIFICATE OF DOCUMENTATION.

2 Notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

3 Act, 1920 (46 U.S.C. App. 883), section 8 of the Act of

4 June 19, 1886 (24 Stat. 81, chapter 421; 46 U.S.C. App.

5 289), and sections 12106 and 12108 of title 46, United

6 States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may issue

7 a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorse8 ment for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

9 YESTERDAYS DREAM, United States official number

10 680266.

Calendar No. 557

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2139

[Report No. 105–318]

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to

DREAM.wise trade for the vessel YESTERDAYSpriate endorsement for employment in the coastissue a certificate of documentation with approSEPTEMBER 9, 1998

Reported without amendment
1 – ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

GERALD KIRSTEIN,

Plaintiff, Civ. No. 1:15-cv-02329-CL

v. ORDER

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL

TRUST COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________

MCSHANE, Judge:

Magistrate Judge Mark Clarke filed a Findings and Recommendation (#17), and the 

matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. Although 

neither party filed objections, I reviewed the legal principles de novo. United States v. Bernhardt, 

840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude the report is correct. Magistrate 

Judge Clarke’s Findings and Recommendation (#17) is adopted. Defendant Quality Loan’s 

motion to dismiss (#5) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 24th day of May, 2016.

_______/s/ Michael J. McShane ________

Michael McShane

United States District Judge

Case 1:15-cv-02329-CL Document 22 Filed 05/24/16 Page 1 of 1
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KEITH DUANE ARLINE, Jr.,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

KEN CLARK; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 14-15335

D.C. No. 1:11-cv-00420-LJO-SAB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Lawrence J. O’Neill, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 18, 2014** 

Before: LEAVY, FISHER, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges. 

Keith Duane Arline, Jr., a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging

deprivation of outdoor exercise in violation of the Eighth Amendment. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Hamilton v. Brown, 630

FILED

DEC 5 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
F.3d 889, 892 (9th Cir. 2011) (dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A); Barren v.

Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir. 1998) (order) (dismissal under 

28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)). We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

The district court properly dismissed Arline’s action against defendants

Vasquez, Clark, and Sherman because Arline failed to allege facts sufficient to link

these defendants to any constitutional violation. See Arnold v. Int’l Bus. Machs.

Corp., 637 F.2d 1350, 1355 (9th Cir. 1981) (to bring a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim,

plaintiff must link each named defendant with some affirmative act or omission

that demonstrates a violation of plaintiff’s constitutional rights); see also Hebbe v.

Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 341-42 (9th Cir. 2010) (although pro se pleadings are

liberally construed, plaintiff must allege sufficient facts to state a plausible claim).

However, the district court prematurely dismissed Arline’s action against

defendants Goss, Wan, and Allison because Arline’s allegations as to these

defendants, liberally construed, were “sufficient to warrant ordering [defendants]

to file an answer.” Wilhelm v. Rotman, 680 F.3d 1113, 1116 (9th Cir. 2012); see

also Thomas v. Ponder, 611 F.3d 1144, 1150-52 (9th Cir. 2010) (setting forth

elements of an Eighth Amendment claim based on deprivation of outdoor

exercise). 

Accordingly, we reverse in part and remand with instructions for the district

2 14-15335
court to order the United States Marshal to serve the second amended complaint on

defendants Goss, Wan, and Allison.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

3 14-15335
Exhibit 31.1

**CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, Boyd E. Hoback, certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-KSBof Good Times Restaurants Inc.;

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;

 

4.     The registrant's other certifying officer and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for theregistrant and have:

 

a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant'sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)     Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financialreporting.

 

5.     The registrant's other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant'sauditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

a)     All significant deficiencies inthe design or operation of internal controls which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant'sinternal controls over financial reporting.

 

 

 

 

Boyd E. Hoback

*President and ChiefExecutive Officer*

December 28, 2007

----
#### WIMMER v. CLEARY et al.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.

December 2, 1895.)

Action by Catherine Wimmer against Patrick Cleary and others.

No opinion. Motion for reargument denied, with $10 costs. DYKMAN, J., not sitting. See 34 N. Y. Supp. 1151.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATIONSCERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Bedo H. Kalpakian, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20F (2004) of Bronx Ventures Inc. 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
report; 4. I, on behalf of the Company, am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to
the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of a date
within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the Evaluation Date); and c) presented in this annual report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 5. I, on behalf of the Company, have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the
Companys auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of Directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could
adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and
have identified for the Companys auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the Companys internal controls; and 6. I, on behalf of the Company, have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. Date: May 31, 2005 Bedo H. KalpakianBedo H. KalpakianChief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 33-34855, No. 33-91198 and No. 333-23351) and in the
Prospectus constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No.
33-34855) of our report dated February 2, 1999 of this Form 10-K. We also
consent to the incorporation by reference of our report on the Financial
Statement Schedule of this Form 10-K.
 
/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
 
Atlanta, Georgia
March 29, 1999
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code)
  (a)
    
    the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended
December 31, 2004 (the Report) of the Company fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.
 December
5, 2005
    

/s/ Charles R. WaldronCharles R. WaldronSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
<PAGE>   1


                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.6.1

                               AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO
                              SC110NAV05 AGREEMENT

                                     BETWEEN

                        SPRINT/UNITED MANAGEMENT COMPANY
                                       AND
                                 VISUAL NETWORKS

This Amendment No. 2 (the "Amendment") by and between Sprint/United Management
Company, a Kansas corporation ("Sprint") and Visual Networks, a Delaware
corporation ("Supplier") amends the MASTER RESELLER AGREEMENT dated August 23,
1996, by and between Sprint and Supplier (the "Agreement"). Except as otherwise
indicated, defined terms in this Amendment have the same meaning as in the
Agreement.

I.     BACKGROUND

       A.     Supplier and Sprint entered into the Agreement August 23, 1996.
       B.     Sprint and Supplier agree to modify the Agreement as set forth in
              this Amendment.

In consideration of the promises and agreements contained in this Amendment, the
parties agree as follows:

II.    AMENDMENT

       The parties agree to modify the paragraph (a) to Article 2.0 of the
       Agreement as follows:

       This Agreement begins on the Effective Date and will remain in force for
       a period of three (3) years and four (4) months, unless terminated as
       provided in this Agreement.

III.   GENERAL

       Other than as set forth above, the Agreement remains unchanged and in
       full force and effect. In the event of a conflict between the terms of
       the Agreement and this Amendment, this Amendment will control.

       This Amendment, executed by authorized representatives of Sprint and
       Supplier, is made a part of and incorporates the terms and conditions of
       the Agreement.

<TABLE>
       <S>                                     <C>
       SPRINT/UNITED MANAGEMENT                 VISUAL NETWORKS
       COMPANY

         /s/ Frank J. Clifford                    /s/ Richard H. Deily
       ---------------------------              ---------------------------
       Signature                                Signature

       Frank J. Clifford                        Richard H. Deily
       Lead Negotiator                          Director Treasury Operations

          8/12/99                                 8/15/99
       ---------------------------              ---------------------------
       Date                                     Date
</TABLE>
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-15-00390-CV

____________________

IN RE THE STATE OF TEXAS

_______________________________________________________ ______________

Original Proceeding

County Court at Law No. 2 of Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 14-05-05339-CV

________________________________________________________ _____________

ORDER 

The State of Texas filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The relator is the 

petitioner in an eminent domain proceeding in Cause No. 14-05-05339-CV, State 

of Texas v. Harper & Manning Investment Properties, LLC. Relator seeks a writ 

compelling the Honorable Claudia Laird, Judge of the County Court at Law No. 2 

of Montgomery County, Texas, to vacate the trial court’s Order Granting Motion 

to Compel and Order Denying the State’s Motion for Protective Order, and to grant 

the State’s Motion for Protective Order. We note our jurisdiction over this matter 

and the parties. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004). 
2

Relator filed a motion to stay the challenged order. See Tex. R. App. P. 

52.10(a). Relator alleges that prejudice will result if it is required to disclose

information that Relator contends is protected by the consulting expert privilege 

before the issues raised in the petition for writ of mandamus can be resolved.

The Court finds temporary relief is necessary to prevent undue prejudice. It 

is ORDERED that the trial court’s Order on Defendant’s Motion to Compel and 

the State’s Motion for Protective Order, signed September 11, 2015, in Cause No. 

14-05-05339-CV, and any discovery, depositions, or production of documents 

compelled thereby, is STAYED until our Opinion issues or until further order of 

this Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.10(b). No bond is required of the Relator as a 

condition to any relief herein granted.

The response of the real party in interest, Harper & Manning Investment 

Properties, LLC, is due October 5, 2015.

MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RELIEF GRANTED.

ORDER ENTERED September 24, 2015.

 PER CURIAM

Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.