alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

 

We have issued our report dated March 11, 2005, which includes an explanatory paragraph for a going concern matter, accompanying the consolidatedfinancial statements and schedule of Digital Lightwave, Inc. that are included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements ofDigital Lightwave, Inc., on Form S-8 (File No. 333-99683, effective September 17, 2002) and on Form S-3 (File No. 333-116531, effective July 23, 2004). 

 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

 

Tampa, Florida 

March 11, 2005
IN THE UNITED STA TES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

IlMMY DALE MILLER, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

NANCY BERRYIIlLL, Acting Commissioner 

of the Social Security Administration, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 6:15 CV 02152-JR 

ORDER 

Magistrate Judge Russo filed her Findings and Recommendation on April 25, 2017. 

The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No 

objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual 

findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 

1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). 

Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error. 

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Russo's Findings and 

Recommendation. 

Dated this ~day of May, 2017. 

Ann Aiken, United States District Judge 

Order -- Page 1
FY 2010 Project Annual Reporting Meeting for TWG

Arizona Department of Water Resources, 3550 N. Central Avenue, Phoenix, AZ

January 18‐19‐ 2011

Tuesday, January 18

08:30‐09:00 John Hamill and Shane Capron ‐ Welcome & Introductions

09:00‐09:40   Paul Grams – Sediment Modeling, Monitoring and Research  

09:40‐10:00   Joe Hazel and Matt Kaplinski – Sandbar and Campsite Area Monitoring  

10:00‐10:10 Break   

10:10‐10:30   Nina Kilham – Changes in Bed Elevation: 1965 to 2009

10:30‐10:50 Helen Fairley – Campsites Monitoring (Atlas and Adopt a Beach)

10:50‐11:10 Amy Draut – Effects of vegetation on Aeolian deposition at arch sites  

11:10‐11:50 Discussion and Recommendations  

11:50a‐1:10p Lunch

1:10‐1:30    Josh Korman – Rainbow Trout Early Life Stage Survival (RTELSS)

1:30‐2:50   Bob Hall, Emma Rossi Marshall, and Ted Kennedy – Aquatic food base study

2:50‐3:10   Josh Korman – Ecosystem Modeling Progress

3:10‐3:30   Discussion and Recommendations

3:30‐3:45   Break

3:45‐4:05   Gwen Waring – Mesquite ecology/status

4:05‐4:25 Neil Cobb – Ground dwelling arthropods

4:25‐4:45 David Cooper – Vegetation sampling approaches long‐term monitoring

4:45‐5:05 NPS (TBD) – Vegetation Mapping Results (handout)

5:05‐5:30   Discussion and Recommendations
Wednesday, January 19

08:15‐08:20 Welcome & Introductions

08:20‐08:40   Carol Fritzinger – Logistics, Permitting and Youth Education

08:40‐9:00   Pam Sponholtz (FWS) – LCR Translocation of Humpback Chub  

9:00‐09:20   Brian Healy (NPS) – Shinumo Translocation and Havasu update

09:20‐9:40 Brian Healy (NPS) – Bright Angel Creek weir results (handout)

9:40‐ 10:00   Break

10:00‐11:00 Bill Pine – Near Shore Ecology Study

11:00‐11:45 Discussion and Recommendations

11:45‐1:00 Lunch

1:00‐1:20 Randy VanHaverbeke (FWS) – Humpback chub LCR Monitoring

1:20‐1:50   Luke Avery (AGF) – Monitoring Lees Ferry Fish

1:50‐2:10 Aaron Bunch (AGF) – Monitoring Down‐stream Fish  

2:10‐2:30 Discussion and Recommendations

2:30‐2:45 Break

2:45‐3:05 Phil Davis – Update on Remote Sensing Data 2009 Overflight

3:05‐3:25 Glenn Bennett – Data Access Management System (DAMS)  

3:25‐3:45 Tom Gushue – Arc Server

3:45‐4:05 Dave Garrett – Science Advisors, Decision Support Proposal

4:05‐4:30 Discussion and Recommendations

4:30‐5:00 John Hamill and Shane Capron ‐ Conclusion

Other Possible Topics—will be added in the event of cancellation

• Lake Powell (Vernieu)
## Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Kevin Cooper Ross, Appellant

No. 06

- 14

- 00095

- CV v.

Tiffany McCrary, Appellee Appeal from the County Court of Franklin
County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 1969 ). Opinion
delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, Justice
Moseley and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed

for want of prosecution. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We further order that the appellant, Kevin Cooper Ross, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED APRIL 7, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:
Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
EXHIBIT 23.2



                    (REED W. FERRILL & ASSOCIATES LETTERHEAD)

                                February 11, 2000




Columbus Energy Corp.
1660 Lincoln Street, Suite 2400
Denver, Colorado 80264




     Reed W. Ferrill & Associates,  Inc. consents to the use of its name and its
reports  dated  January 27, 2000 entitled  "Columbus  Energy Corp.,  Reserve and
Revenue Forecast as of November 30, 1999, Constant Prices and Costs" in whole or
in part, by Columbus  Energy Corp.  (Columbus) in Columbus'  Form 10-K Report to
the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission for the fiscal year ended November 30,
1999.

                                            for and on behalf of
                                            Reed W. Ferrill & Associates, Inc.

                                            \s\Reed W. Ferrill
                                            --------------------
                                            Reed W. Ferrill
                                            President
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Rangeland Resources & Systems Research: Fort Collins, CO
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Areas of Research
                        CARM
                                    PHACE
                                    Thunder Basin
                                    Modeling
                                    WindSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Adaptive Grazing Managementheadline bar Research
               CARM Presentations
               CARM Weekly Updates
               CARM Publications


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
**Exhibit 10.12**

 

**AMENDMENT No. 1To****META GROUP, INC.NON-COMPETITION AGREEMENT**

 

This Amendment No. 1 (“Amendment”) is entered into as ofJuly 31, 2002 (the “Amendment Effective Date”) between HOWARD RUBIN, an individual residing at 450 Long Ridge Road, PoundRidge, New York 10576 (“Principal”), and META Group, Inc., to amend the **NON-COMPETITIONAGREEMENT**, dated as of October 27, 2000 (the “Agreement”) betweenthe parties. Terms not otherwise defined in this Amendment shall have the samemeaning ascribed to them in the Agreement.

 

For good and valuableconsideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, theParties hereby agree to amend the Agreement as follows:

 

1.               Thedate in line 2 of Section 2 (a) is modified as follows:

 

“2. (a) For the period commencing on the date hereof andending on the later of (i) December 31, 2006 or (ii) twelve (12) monthsfollowing the termination of Principal’s employment with Company for any reason(the “Non-Competition Period”):”

 

The remainder of Section 2 (a) is unchanged.

 

2. A new subsection (c) isadded at the end of Section 2 (b) as follows:

 

2. (c)Principal agrees to avoid using for business communication any personal emailand is required to use META Group’s email and sanctioned business cards duringofficial META Group business.

 

3. InSection 11, add the following for an additional copy to Company:

 

and Attention: General CounselMETA Group, Inc.208 Harbor DriveStamford, CT  06912Fax:  (203) 388-2545

 

4. In the event of anyinconsistency between the terms of this Amendment and the terms of theAgreement, this Amendment shall take precedence.

 

5. Except as expressly amendedas set forth herein, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect inaccordance with its terms.

 

6. This Amendment may beexecuted in several counterparts, all of which taken together shall constituteone single agreement of the parties.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the partieshave caused this Amendment to be executed by their duly authorizedrepresentatives as of the date first written above.

 

 
|   | META GROUP, INC. |
|--------|------------------|
|   |             |
|   | By:              | /s/ John A. Piontkowski |
|   |             | Name: John A. Piontkowski |
|   |             | Title: Chief Financial Officer |
|   |             |
|   | PRINCIPAL:       |
|   | /s/ Howard Rubin |
|   | Howard Rubin     |

 

 

----
# L_2009074EN.01003101.xml

| 20.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 74/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 74/31

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 16 March 2009

appointing three members of the European Statistical Governance Advisory Board

(2009/250/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Decision No 235/2008/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2008 establishing the European Statistical Governance Advisory Board (1), and in particular Article 3 thereof,

Having regard to the opinion of the Commission,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following are hereby appointed as the members representing the Council in the European Statistical Governance Advisory Board for a period of three years:

| — | Sir Tony ATKINSON, Senior Research Fellow, Nuffield College, Oxford, United Kingdom, |
| --- | --- |

—

Sir Tony ATKINSON, Senior Research Fellow, Nuffield College, Oxford, United Kingdom,

| — | Johann HAHLEN, Former President of the Federal Statistical Office, Germany, |
| --- | --- |

—

Johann HAHLEN, Former President of the Federal Statistical Office, Germany,

| — | Edvard OUTRATA, Former President of the Czech Statistical Office, Czech Republic. |
| --- | --- |

—

Edvard OUTRATA, Former President of the Czech Statistical Office, Czech Republic.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 16 March 2009.

For the Council

The President

A. VONDRA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 73, 15.3.2008, p. 17.

1

---
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-15-00195-CV

Style: N.G. v. Department of family and Protective Services

Date motion filed*: March 10, 2015

Type of motion: Motion for extension of time to file clerk’s record

Party filing motion: District clerk

Document to be filed: Clerk’s record

Is appeal accelerated? Yes

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: March 9, 2015

Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date

Date Requested: March 20, 2015

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: March 20, 2015

 The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time.

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

Because this is a termination case, the Court is required to bring this appeal to final disposition within 180

days of the date the notice of appeal was filed so far as reasonably possible. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2, 

reprinted in TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN., tit. 2, subtit. F app. (West 2013). Accordingly, no further extensions 

will be granted.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd

 

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: March 12, 2015
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

 

VRAJESHKUMAR PATEL, § 

individually and on behalf of all § No. 347, 2021 

others similarly situated, and § 

derivatively on behalf of Nominal § 

Defendant TALOS ENERGY INC., § 

 § Court Below—Court of Chancery 

 Plaintiff Below, § of the State of Delaware 

 Appellant, § 

 § C.A. No. 2020-0418 

 v. § 

 § 

TIMOTHY S. DUNCAN, et al., § 

 § 

Defendants Below, § 

 Appellees, § 

 § 

 and § 

 § 

TALOS ENERGY INC., § 

 § 

 Nominal Defendant Below, § 

 Appellee. § 

 Submitted: May 11, 2022 

 Decided: May 25, 2022 

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA, VAUGHN, TRAYNOR, and

MONTGOMERY-REEVES, Justices, constituting the Court en Banc. 

ORDER 

 This 25th day of May 2022, after careful consideration of the parties’ briefs 

and the record below, and following oral argument, we find it evident that the 

judgment of the Court of Chancery should be affirmed on the basis of and for the 

reasons stated in the court’s Memorandum Opinion dated October 4, 2021.
2

 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of 

Chancery is AFFIRMED. 

 BY THE COURT: 

 /s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. 

 Chief Justice
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VICTOR MANUEL AGUILARORELLANA, AKA Victor Aguilar, AKA 

Victor Manuel Orellana Aguilar,

Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent.

No. 14-72683

Agency No. A095-729-459

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 26, 2016**

Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Victor Manuel Aguilar-Orellana, a native and citizen of El Salvador, 

petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order 

dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

AUG 3 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 2 14-72683 

application for withholding of removal and protection under the Convention 

Against Torture (“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We 

review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Zehatye v. 

Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny in part and dismiss 

in part the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s finding that Aguilar-Orellana failed 

to establish his past experiences with gang members in El Salvador rose to the 

level of persecution, see Hoxha v. Ashcroft, 319 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir. 2003), 

or that it is more likely than not he would be persecuted in El Salvador on account 

of a protected ground, see Parussimova v. Mukasey, 555 F.3d 734, 740-41 (9th Cir. 

2009). We lack jurisdiction to consider the particular social group AguilarOrellana proposes for the first time in his opening brief. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 

358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2004) (petitioner must exhaust claim in 

administrative proceedings below). Thus, Aguilar-Orellana’s withholding of 

removal claim fails.

Substantial evidence also supports the BIA’s denial of Aguilar-Orellana’s 

CAT claim because he failed to establish that it is more likely than not that he 

would be tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if 
 3 14-72683 

returned to El Salvador. See Silaya v. Mukasey, 524 F.3d 1066, 1073 (9th Cir. 

2008).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
#### SOUTHERN STATES FIRE & CASUALTY INS. CO. v. WHATLEY.

(Decided May 30, 1912.)

Appeal from Jefferson Chancery Court.

Heard before Hon. A. H. Benners.

Lamkin & Watts, for appellant. Gordon & Eddington, for appellee.

Mayfield, J.

— Affirmed on the authority of *So. St. F. & C. I. Co. v.*Brannen, 178 Ala. 115; 58 South. 60.
WILBORN LAW OFFICE, P.C. 

TIM WILBORN, Attorney at Law - OSB # 944644 

tim@wilbornlaw.com 

P.O. Box 370578 

Las Vegas, NV 89137 

Voice: (702) 240-0184 

Fax: (503) 926-9133 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

RAQUEL PEAR, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

COMMISSIONER of Social Security, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 6:15-cv-01451-TC 

ORDER 

Attorneys' fees in the amount of $22,718.25 are hereby awarded to Attorney Tim Wilborn 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b ). Previously, this court awarded fees pursuant to the Equal Access 

To Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. When issuing the§ 406(b) check, the agency is directed 

to subtract the amount of the EAJ A fee previously received by the attorney and to send to Plaintiffs 

attorney, Tim Wilborn, at the address above, the balance of $17,552.43, minus any user fee. Any 

amount withheld after all administrative and court attorneys fees are paid should be released to the · 

claimant. 

DATED this l { day of __ J~e__~(._.~_., 2018. 

Presented by: 

s/ Tim Wilborn, OSB # 944644 

(702) 240-0184 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

ORDER - Page 1 

··a~ ~ Magistrate Judge
GCMRC Proposed draft  12‐18‐09

1

AGENDA

GCMRC FY 09 Annual Project Reporting Meeting

January 19‐20, 2010

AZ Dept of Water Resources

3550 N. Central Avenue

Phoenix AZ

602‐771‐8500

January 19, 2010    Project Title         Presenter

0930       Introductions and Objectives     Hamill

1000       Historical Data for Lake Powell     Vernieu

1030       Aquatic Foodbase         Kennedy

1100       NSE/Fall Steady Flow Study     Yard/Pine

   

1130       Rainbow Trout Early Life History     Korman

         

Noon       LUNCH

0100       Lees Ferry         Makinster    

0130       Mainstem Electrofishing and Mechanical   

     Removal         Makinster   

   

0200       Lower 1200/Remote Antenna Array    Brian Clark/B. Persons

    

0230       LCR Population Estimates/C.F. Translocation Vanhaverbeke   

   

0300       BREAK

0315       Tribal Monitoring         Berry?

0345       Archaeological Site Treatment Plan     Berry?
GCMRC Proposed draft  12‐18‐09

2

0415       Cultural Monitoring R&D     Fairley

0445       Recreation Studies         Fairley/NPS   

   

0515       AJOURN

January 20, 2010    Project Title         Presenter

0800       DASA 12.D2.09: Grand Canyon Integrated   Paul Alley

Oracle Database Management System    

0845       DASA 12.D1.09:2009 Overflight and  

      Integrated data analysis/modeling Phil Davis /Tom Gushue

0915       DASA 12.D5.09: GIS General Support for        

      Integrated Analyses and Projects Tom Gushue

0945       open

1000       BREAK

1015       Channel Mapping/Control Network    Grams

1045       Integrated Flow‐Sed‐Temp Modeling    Wright

1115       Downstream Water Quality     Topping

1145       LUNCH

     March 2008 High Flow Experimental Project Reports

0100       Project 1.A: Sand Budgeting     Topping

0130       Project 1.B: Eddy Modeling     Wright

0200       Project 1.C: Sandbar Changes     Hazel

0230       Project 1.D: Backwaters       Grams

0300       BREAK

0315       Project 2: Terrestrial Vegetation     Ralston

0345       Project 3: Influence on Aquatic Food    Kennedy
GCMRC Proposed draft  12‐18‐09

3

0415       Project 4.A: Influence on Rainbow Trout   Korman    

     Project 4.B: Rainbow Trout Movement    Hilwig

0500       Project 5: Influence on Quality of Water   Vernieu

0530       AJOURN
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-4153

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CHARLES EDWARD PALMER, JR., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-94-105) Submitted: June 30, 1998 Decided: August 12, 1998Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. G. Wells Dickson, Jr., Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellant. Sean Kittrell, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Charles Edward Palmer, Jr., appeals from his convictions pursuant to his guilty plea for bank robbery and use of a firearm during an attempted bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 924(c) (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) and 18 U.S.C. §§ 2113(a), (d) (1994) and his resulting sentence. We affirm.Palmer’s attorney filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), raising as a potentially meritorious issue the district court’s denial of Palmer’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea and his motion for reconsideration of the same. We have reviewed each of the allegations of error cited below and onappeal and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Palmer’s motions. See United States v. Wilson , 81 F.3d 1300, 1305 (4th Cir. 1996) (providing standard). Palmer has also filed a pro se brief raising several allegations of error. We have reviewed each of these claims and determine them to be without merit. Pursuant to Anders , this court has reviewed the record for potential error and has found none. Therefore, we affirm Palmer’s conviction and sentence. This court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petitionbe filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move this court for leave to withdraw from3 representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the material before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED