alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Paul Katzeff, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Thanksgiving Coffee Company, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge,
this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the small business issuer and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting;

5. The small business issuers
other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of
directors (or persons performing the Equivalent functions);

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



|      |  |                                      
|----- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: |  | August 14, 2007                      
|      | 
|By:   |  | /s/ Paul Katzeff                     
|      |  | Paul Katzeff, Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 24.2


                                   CERTIFICATE

     I, KENNETH J. WARREN,  hereby certify that I am the duly elected  Secretary
of Royal Precision,  Inc., a Delaware  corporation (the  "Corporation"),  and do
further certify that the following resolutions were duly adopted by the Board of
Directors of the  Corporation at a meeting duly called and held on May 30, 2001,
and that such  resolutions  have not been amended or rescinded,  and are in full
force and effect:

     RESOLVED,  that each officer and director who may be required to execute an
annual report on Form 10-K or any amendment or  supplement  thereto  (whether on
behalf of the Company or as an officer or director thereof or otherwise) be, and
each of them hereby is,  authorized  to execute a power of  attorney  appointing
Richard P. Johnston and Thomas A. Schneider and each of them severally, his true
and lawful  attorneys and agents to execute in his name, place and stead (in any
such  capacity) said Form 10-K and all  instruments  or reports  necessary or in
connection  therewith,  and to file the same with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission,  each of said  attorneys and agents to have the power to act with or
without the other,  to have full power and authority to do and to perform in the
name and on behalf of each of said officers and directors,  or both, as the case
may be, every act which is  necessary  or advisable to be done as fully,  and to
all intents and purposes,  as any such officer or director  might or could do in
person; and further ....

     Dated this 1st day of August, 2001.


                                   /s/ Kenneth J. Warren
                                   ----------------------------------
                                   Kenneth J. Warren
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-KSB
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCT TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>


<S>                                         <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999             AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1999             AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                         117,905                 373,100
<SECURITIES>                                 5,111,062                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,082                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,242,396                 389,997
<PP&E>                                       5,106,847               2,546,059
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,762,521               2,939,602
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          221,253               1,328,330
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                         23                       0
<COMMON>                                        14,409                   9,155
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,525,774               1,599,456
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,762,521               2,939,602
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               116,713                  46,145
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,073,864                 712,661
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             183,256                     488
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,140,407)               (110,807)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,140,407)               (110,807)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,140,407)               (110,807)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (.105)                  (.012)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.105)                  (.012)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the annual report of 110 Media Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on April ___, 2004 (the "Report"), I,
Darren Cioffi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.



/s/ Darren Cioffi
----------------------
Darren Cioffi
Chief Financial Officer
April 15, 2005


A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Core Monitoring Workshop – December 1, 2009 

and Socio-economic Workshop – December 2-3, 2009 

List of Attachments

No. Attachment Presenter / Author 

1 

Workshop Prospectus to Guide Development of a Work Plan and 

Request for Proposal to Address High Priority Socio-Economic 

Information Needs of the GCDAMP 

Helen Fairley 

2 General Core Monitoring Plan List of Major TWG Issues to Begin 

Consideration 

Shane Capron 

3 General Core Monitoring Plan Specific Issues Shane Capron 

4 General Core Monitoring Plan TWG Comments and Suggestions PPT Shane Capron 

5 General Core Monitoring Plan for the GCD-AMP PPT John Hamill 

6 Review of the General Core Monitoring Plan for the GCDAMP by the 

Science Advisors PPT Dave Garrett 

7 General Core Monitoring Plan, December 1, 2009 TWG Workshop 

Results Shane Capron 

8 Socioeconomics and the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management 

Program PPT Helen Fairley 

9 Science Advisors Perspective on Needed GCDAMP Socio-economic 

Research PPT Dave Garrett 

10 Estimating Colorado River Storage Project Power Economics with the 

GTMax Model PPT Thomas D. Veselka 

11 Glen Canyon Dam Releases – Economic Considerations Report, Email dated 12/10/09, and Tables 1-3 David Marcus 

12 Integrated Recreation Use and Net Economic Value Utility PPT David Harpman 

13 Economic Impacts of the Grand Canyon River Runners and the 2000 

LSSF of the Colorado River; Economic Impacts of the 2000 LSSF of 

the Colorado River PPT

Yeon-Su Kim and 

Evan E. Hjerpe 

14 The Alchemy of Power Economics: Turning watts into dollars Clayton Palmer 

15 General Core Monitoring Plan Dec. 1, 2009 TWG Workshop Results Shane Capron
Page 1 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REDUCE SENTENCE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

SANTIAGO SALAZAR MOLINA, 

 Defendant. 

 Case No. 3:14-cr-00442-SI-2 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 

REDUCE SENTENCE 

This matter is before the Court on the defendant's motion to reduce sentence pursuant to 

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(l)(A)(i). The government does not oppose a sentence reduction. Based on the 

motion and after full consideration of the relevant factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), the Court 

finds that extraordinary and compelling reasons warrant a reduction of defendant’s sentence to 

time served for the reasons stated in the defendant’s motion. 

The effective date shall be 72 hours after the entry of an amended judgment in order to 

permit time for Immigration and Customs Enforcement to arrange for the defendant to be 

transferred to its custody and for the private prison under Bureau of Prisons contract to provide a 

test and determine that Mr. Molina does not have a positive result for Covid-19. If the facility 

cannot or does not make the determination by that date, the government shall notify the Court 

without delay. The Court concludes that the defendant’s release pursuant to this order will not pose 

Case 3:14-cr-00442-SI Document 280 Filed 08/13/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REDUCE SENTENCE

a danger to any other person or the community and is consistent with Sentencing Commission 

policy statements and the totality of the circumstances. 

The Court therefore GRANTS the Motion to Reduce Sentence to time served. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that an amended judgment and commitment order shall be 

prepared and entered forthwith amending the term of imprisonment to time served, effective 72 

hours after the entry of the amended judgment, with all conditions of supervised release remaining 

the same. 

Dated this 13th day of August, 2021. 

/s/ Michael H. Simon 

Honorable Michael H. Simon 

United States District Court Judge 

Case 3:14-cr-00442-SI Document 280 Filed 08/13/21 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          11,119
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  219,986
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,835
<INVENTORY>                                    122,196
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               416,225
<PP&E>                                         101,911
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 625,813
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          367,161
<BONDS>                                        762,119
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          200,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           212
<OTHER-SE>                                  (1,272,782)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   625,813
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,137,004
<CGS>                                        1,969,173
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   67,830
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,475
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              54,301
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 39,225
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,428
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             35,797
<DISCONTINUED>                                (198,000)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (162,203)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.83)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.81)


</TABLE>
# L_2009231EN.01002101.xml

| 3.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 231/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 231/21

---

COMMISSION DECISION

of 2 September 2009

correcting Directive 2002/48/EC amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC to include iprovalicarb, prosulfuron and sulfosulfuron as active substances

(notified under document C(2009) 6612)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/685/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market (1), and in particular the second indent of the second subparagraph of Article 6(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Directive 2002/48/EC (2) contains errors concerning the period of inclusion of the active substances: iprovalicarb, prosulfuron and sulfosulfuron. Those errors must be corrected. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Directive 2002/48/EC (2) contains errors concerning the period of inclusion of the active substances: iprovalicarb, prosulfuron and sulfosulfuron. Those errors must be corrected.

| (2) | The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Annex to Directive 2002/48/EC is corrected as follows:

| 1. | In the entry for iprovalicarb in the sixth column, the words ‘30 June 2011’ are replaced by the words ‘30 June 2012’. |
| --- | --- |

1.

In the entry for iprovalicarb in the sixth column, the words ‘30 June 2011’ are replaced by the words ‘30 June 2012’.

| 2. | In the entry for prosulfuron in the sixth column, the words ‘30 June 2011’ are replaced by the words ‘30 June 2012’. |
| --- | --- |

2.

In the entry for prosulfuron in the sixth column, the words ‘30 June 2011’ are replaced by the words ‘30 June 2012’.

| 3. | In the entry for sulfosulfuron in the sixth column, the words ‘30 June 2011’ are replaced by the words ‘30 June 2012’. |
| --- | --- |

3.

In the entry for sulfosulfuron in the sixth column, the words ‘30 June 2011’ are replaced by the words ‘30 June 2012’.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 2 September 2009.

For the Commission

Androulla VASSILIOU

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 230, 19.8.1991, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 148, 6.6.2002, p. 19.

2

---
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Neville Francis, Appellant, v Jewelry Box Corporation of America et al., Respondents and Special Fund for Reopened Cases, Respondent. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

[945 NYS2d 767]—

Mercure, J.P.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed December 14, 2010, which denied claimant’s application to reopen his workers’ compensation claim.

After sustaining a traumatic work-related crush injury to his right hand in August 1987, claimant was classified as having a permanent partial disability and awarded workers’ compensation benefits. On May 26, 1993, the Workers’ Compensation Board approved a lump-sum nonschedule adjustment pursuant to Workers’ Compensation Law § 15 (5-b) in the amount of *1516$54,600, and the case was closed. Thereafter, claimant made several applications attempting to reopen his claim. These applications were rejected, however, because he did not demonstrate a change in condition that was not contemplated at the time of the original settlement. As relevant to the subject reopening request, claimant submitted, among other things, a letter and medical narrative report from his treating psychologist, alleging that claimant is totally disabled due to chronic major depression, posttraumatic stress disorder and chronic pain disorder stemming from the August 1987 accident. The Board, noting that claimant previously waived his right to have his case established for psychiatric injury, ruled that the proof submitted was insufficient to support his request to reopen his claim. This appeal followed.

We affirm. “[A] lump-sum nonschedule adjustment effectively closes the claim unless the Board finds proof ‘that there has been a change in condition or in the degree of disability of [the] claimant not found in the medical evidence and, therefore, not contemplated at the time of the adjustment’ ” *(Matter of Bunnell v Sangerfield Inn,*35 AD3d 1021, 1022 [2006], quoting Workers’ Compensation Law § 15 [5-b]). Here, as noted by the Board, the medical reports submitted by claimant’s psychologist do not describe an unanticipated change in claimant’s condition for the established injury site, i.e., his right hand. While claimant is attempting to expand his claim to include a consequential psychiatric injury *(see Matter of Bunnell v Sangerfield Inn,*35 AD3d at 1022), the transcript of the May 24, 1993 lump-sum hearing establishes that claimant, whose physician had recommended psychiatric counseling, unequivocally stated that he wished to settle his case at that time and was waiving any right to have his case additionally established for a consequential psychiatric injury. Under the circumstances, there is substantial evidence supporting the Board’s conclusion that claimant did not sufficiently allege an unanticipated change in his medical condition warranting the reopening of his claim *(see Matter of Thomas v Crucible Materials Corp.,*73 AD3d 1323, 1325 [2010]; *Matter of Bunnell v Sangerfield Inn,*35 AD3d at 1023).

Claimant’s remaining arguments are not properly before us.

Rose, Stein, Garry and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
# L_2009040EN.01003501.xml

| 11.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 40/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 40/35

---

COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION

of 10 February 2009

concerning the discharge to be given to the Commission in respect of the implementation of the operations of the European Development Fund (Seventh EDF) for the financial year 2007

(2009/112/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to the Fourth ACP-EEC Convention, signed at Lomé on 15 December 1989 (1) and amended by the Agreement signed in Mauritius on 4 November 1995 (2),

Having regard to Internal Agreement 91/401/EEC on the financing and administration of Community aid under the fourth ACP-EEC Convention (3), hereinafter referred to as the Internal Agreement, setting up, amongst others, the Seventh European Development Fund (Seventh EDF) and in particular Article 32(3) thereof,

Having regard to the Financial Regulation 91/491/EEC of 29 July 1991 applicable to development finance cooperation under the Fourth ACP-EEC Convention (4), and in particular Articles 69 to 77 thereof,

Having examined the revenue and expenditure account and the balance sheet relating to the operations of the Seventh EDF as at 31 December 2007 and the Court of Auditors′ report concerning the financial year 2007 together with the Commission's replies (5),

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 32(3) of the Internal Agreement, the discharge for the financial management of the Seventh EDF is to be given to the Commission by the European Parliament on the recommendation of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 32(3) of the Internal Agreement, the discharge for the financial management of the Seventh EDF is to be given to the Commission by the European Parliament on the recommendation of the Council.

| (2) | The overall implementation by the Commission of the operations of the Seventh EDF during the financial year 2007 has been satisfactory, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The overall implementation by the Commission of the operations of the Seventh EDF during the financial year 2007 has been satisfactory,

HEREBY RECOMMENDS that the European Parliament give the Commission a discharge in respect of the implementation of the operations of the Seventh EDF for the financial year 2007.

Done at Brussels, 10 February 2009.

For the Council

The President

M. KALOUSEK

---

(1)  
  OJ L 229, 17.8.1991, p. 3.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 156, 29.5.1998, p. 3.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 229, 17.8.1991, p. 288.

3

(4)  
  OJ L 266, 21.9.1991, p. 1.

4

(5)  
  OJ C 286, 10.11.2008, p. 273.

5

---
#### FALL BROOK COAL CO., Appellant, v. HEWSON, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Gen*1125eral Term, Fifth Department.

December 28, 1895.)

Action by the Fall Brook Goal Cpmpany against Robert C. Hewson.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed. BRADLEY, J., not voting.