alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2171

AN ACT

To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act applicable to the construction of a hydroelectric project in the

State of Arkansas.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 2171 ES

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINES.

2 Notwithstanding the time limitations of section 13 of

3 the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806), the Federal En4 ergy Regulatory Commission, upon the request of the li5 censee for FERC Project No. 10455 (and after reasonable

6 notice), is authorized, in accordance with the good faith,

7 due diligence and public interest requirements of section

8 13 and the Commission’s procedures under such section,

9 to extend the time required for commencement of con10 struction of the project for up to a maximum of three con11 secutive two-year periods. This section shall take effect for

12 the project upon the expiration of the extension (issued

13 by the Commission under section 13) of the period re14 quired for commencement of such project.

Passed the Senate October 2, 1998.

Attest:

Secretary.
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2171

AN ACT

To extend the deadline under the Federal Power

electric project in the State of Arkansas.Act applicable to the construction of a hydro-
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF MAJESTIC STAR CASINO, LLC

1.   Majestic Star Casino Capital Corp., an Indiana corporation
2.   Majestic Investor, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
2.   Majestic Investor Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
3.   Majestic Investor Capital Corp., a Delaware corporation
4.   Barden Colorado Gaming, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company
5.   Barden Mississippi Gaming, LLC, a Mississippi limited liability company
6.   Barden Nevada Gaming, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company














                                      E-7
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
        2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report of Total Identity Corp. (the "Company")
        on
        Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
        and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Matthew P. Dwyer, CEO and CFO
        of the
        Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
        SS. 906
        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
   September 13, 2006
              
              By: /s/ Matthew P. DwyerMatthew P. Dwyer, CEO, CFO, President, principal executive
                officer and principal financial and accounting officer
  A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
        authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
        in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has
        been
        provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
        to the
        Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Glen Canyon Glen Canyon

Dam and Powerpla

Dam and Powerpla

U.S. Departmen

U.S. Departmen

Bureau of R

Bureau of R

March 3

March 3
Unit Outage Plan and Stra

Unit Outage Plan and Stra
Glen Canyon Outage Sche

Glen Canyon Outage Sche

3⁄4 Schedule does not reflect any specia

Schedule does not reflect any speci

releases beyond 2004. releases beyond 2004.

3⁄4 Schedule does not reflect any TCD Schedule does not reflect any TCD 

Construction. Construction.

3⁄4 Reflects request from Western for no 

Reflects request from Western for n

than one Generator down in the mon

Generator down in the mo

June, July, and August. June, July, and August.

3⁄4 Schedule attempts to accomplish Schedule attempts to accomplish 

Maximum Availability. Maximum Availability.
Fixed Wheel Gate Mainten

Fixed Wheel Gate Mainten

 3 Week Unit O 1 Gate Per Yeor Early Fall
Penstock Recoating Penstock Recoating

Two Un2 MontUnit 4 SSept. 20Unit 1 SNov. 200
Units 4 & 7 Rewinds Units 4 & 7 Rewinds

6 Month OUnit 4 ScSept. 2004 Unit 7 ScSept. 2005 
Turbine Runner Replacem

Turbine Runner Replacem

 One Turbine Runner Replaced per year starting in September 2005. Unit 7 is scheduled first to correspond with the unit rewind. 6 month Unit Outage Required.Schedule Replacements per condition of existing runners.





Glen Canyon Powerplant

5-Year Maintenance Plan 2004-2009

0123456789

10

J

a

n

-

0

4

J

u

l

-

0

4

J

a

n

-

0

5

J

u

l

-

0

5

J

a

n

-

0

6

J

u

l

-

0

6

J

a

n

-

0

7

J

u

l

-

0

7

J

a

n

-

0

8

Available Units (8 maximum) )) 
Outage Schedule Final Po

Outage Schedule Final Po

3⁄4 Reflects Major Budget Items for Replaceme

Reflects Major Budget Items for Replaceme

1. Generator Rewinds (2001) 1. Generator Rewinds (2001)

2. Turbine Runner Replacements (2002) 2. Turbine Runner Replacements (2002)

3. Generator Excitation Units (2000) 3. Generator Excitation Units (2000)

3⁄4 If unable to perform Maintenance Activities 

If unable to perform Maintenance Activities 

there should be an reasonable expectation 

there should be an reasonable expectation 

Forced Outages will increase and Unit Ava

Forced Outages will increase and Unit Ava

will decrease. will decrease.

3⁄4 Questions? Questions?
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-13-0005968

24-SEP-2015

08:03 AM
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Mosquito and Fly Research: Gainesville, FL
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Gainesville, Florida Center for Medical, Agricultural and Veterinary Entomology Mosquito and Fly Research Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Collaborations The Mosquito and Fly Research has a long and productive history of collaborative research involving stakeholders.  Current collaborators and projects:  Understanding Multiscale Environmental Predictors of Zoonotic Risk from Satellite Data  Synergizing Pyrethroid-treated Military Fabrics with Potassium Channel Blockers


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Pest Management Research: Sidney, MT
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    NPARL
                        Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory
                                    Agricultural Systems Research Unit
                                    Grasshoppers: Their Biology, Identification and ManagementSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Sidney, Montana Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory Pest Management Research Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Collaborations The Pest Management Research has a long and productive history of collaborative research involving stakeholders.  Current collaborators and projects:


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
### NUMBER 13
- 20
- 00 420
- CV 

## COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI
- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ ANGELIC ROMO , Appellant,

v.
SAMUEL SUAREZ , Appellee.

____________________________________________________________ On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________ 

## MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Perkes Memorandum Opinion by Justice Longoria
Appellant Angelic Ro mo attempted to perfect an appeal from an order signed on October 7, 2020 , granting appellee’s attorney’s motion to withdraw and to substitute
counsel

. Upon review of the documents before the Court, it appeared that the order from which this appeal was taken was not a final appealable order. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could
be done. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 37.1, 42.3. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not2 corrected within fifteen days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be
dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant failed to respond to the Court ’ s notice. 1 Absent an appealable interlocutory or der or final judgment , this C ourt has no jurisdiction over this appeal. See Ogletree v. Matthews , 262 S.W.3d 316, 319 n. 1 (Tex. 2007); Lehm ann v. Har

– Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001) ; Northeast Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Aldridge , 400 S.W.2d 893, 895 (Tex. 1966). The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant ’ s failure to correct the defect in this matter, is of the opini on that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3( a ),(c).

NORA L. LONGORIA Justice
Delivered and filed the 10th day of Decemb er , 2020.

1 Appellant has subsequently filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this matter under appellate cause number 13

- 20

- 00440

- CV, which remains pending with the Court.
EXHIBIT
32


CERTIFICATION





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), each
of the undersigned hereby certifies in the capacity indicated below that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Imperial Capital Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”)
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements included in
such report.











Date:
      November 16, 2009
            /s/ Joseph W. Kiley IIIJoseph
      W. Kiley IIIPresident
      andChief
      Executive Officer





Date:
      November 16, 2009
            /s/ Timothy M. DoyleTimothy
      M. DoyleExecutive
      Managing Director andChief
      Financial Officer
Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program

Ad Hoc Committee on Strategic Planning

August 21 and 22, 2000 Meeting Notes

Detailed Outline of AMP Strategic Plan

1. Introduction

A. The only previous Strategic Plan was for the GCMRC. This is for AMP as a whole. 

B. GCMRC has a separate Strategic Plan that flows from this one.

C. Brief description of the Strategic Planning process and acknowledgment of participants

2. Background

A. History of the Adaptive Management Program

i. When the various institutions came into existence.

ii. Where the institutions’ authority derives.

iii. History of compliance with federal laws.

B. Geographic scope of the program 

C. Roles and responsibilities

i. Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Work Group (AMWG)

ii. Secretary’s Designee

iii. Technical Work Group (TWG)

iv. Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center (GCMRC)

v. Independent Review Panels (IRP)

vi. National Research Council (NRC)

vii. Protocol Evaluation Panels (PEP)

viii. Compliance responsibilities

D. Institutional Scope – what the program influences or is influenced by

i. Annual Operating Plan (AOP)

ii. Programmatic Agreement (PA)
Detailed Outline of AMP Strategic Plan Page 2

R:\WEB\twg-00sep20\Attach_14.doc

iii. Biological Opinion (BO)

iv. National Park Service (NPS) activities 

v. List of guiding and relevant documents (from Chris Harris)

E. Philosophy underpinning the AMP

i. Scientific (less detail here than in the GCMRC plan)

ii. Management

iii. How the two are integrated

iv. How the management of one resource affects other resources

F. Protocols and procedures – how the AMP works

i. Charters of AMWG and TWG

ii. Operating procedures of AMWG and TWG

iii. How the Programmatic Agreement is integrated with the GCMRC Cultural 

Resources program

iv. Calendar

a. Budget development process

b. Annual report to Congress

c. SCORE report

d. Annual Science Plan

e. Request For Proposal (RFP) process

3. Environmental Scan

A. Internal strengths and weakness

B. External threats and opportunities

C. Legal sideboards within which the AMP operates, including compliance

D. Cultural and social diversity issues

4. 2001-2002 Strategic Plan

A. Principles

B. Vision-Mission statement
Detailed Outline of AMP Strategic Plan Page 3

R:\WEB\twg-00sep20\Attach_14.doc

C. Goals (including capacity-building goals)

D. Management Objectives (MOs)

E. Information Needs (INs)

F. Management Actions (MAs)

G. Glossary

5. Constraints and Barriers to Achieving Goals

6. Action plan: what is done, under whose direction, with whom, by when, how you know when it 

is completed.

7. Plan for periodic review 

A. Validation of the goals, MAs, and current operating criteria – are they getting us where 

we want to go.

B. How often is this review accomplished?

C. How is this review done and by whom?
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Applied Microsystems
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Stephen J. Verleye, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: August 19, 2003

                                           /s/ Stephen J. Verleye
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Stephen J. Verleye
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Applied Microsystems Corporation
and will be retained by Applied Microsystems Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In re BINGHAMTON R. CO.

(Supreme Appellate Division, Third Department.

September 14, 1896.)

Application by the Binghamton Railroad Company for the appointment of cómmissioners to determine whether a street surface railroad ought to be constructed and operated on Front street, in the city of Binghamton, between Main street and Ferry street.

No opinion. The report of the confirmed, and the motion for leave to appeal^ to the court of appeals from the order appointing commissioners denied.
Exhibit 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Colmena Corp. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Adam C. Wasserman,
Chief Financial Officer and Controller of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:
          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The
          information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result
of operations of the Company.

/s/ Adam C. Wasserman

Adam C. Wasserman
Chief Financial Officer and Controller
August 14, 2003
1 – ORDER FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO EAJA

Drew L. Johnson

Kathryn Tassinari

sherwoodreese@comcast.net

kathrynt50@comcast.net

1700 Valley River Drive

Eugene, OR 97401

(541) 434-6466

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 DISTRICT OF OREGON

KEVIN R. BULGER,

Civil No. 6:15-CV-01873-SI

Plaintiff, 

 ORDER FOR ATTORNEY FEES

vs. PURSUANT TO EAJA

 

Commissioner of Social Security 

Administration,

Defendant.

____________________________________

After considering the Stipulated Motion of the parties submitted herein, Order hereby 

grants that Commissioner shall pay Plaintiff’s attorney the sum of $5239.97 upon verification 

that Plaintiff has no debt to the government which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, 

pursuant to the reasoning in Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 130 S. Ct. 2521, 2527 (2010) (EAJA 

awards fees subject “to a federal administrative offset if the Litigant has outstanding federal 

debts”) for full settlement of all claims for fees under EAJA. 

Case 6:15-cv-01873-SI Document 21 Filed 03/02/17 Page 1 of 2
2 – ORDER FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO EAJA

If Plaintiff has no such federal debt, payment of $5239.97 shall be made to Plaintiff’s 

attorney and mailed to his office at 1700 Valley River Drive, Eugene, OR 97401. If Plaintiff 

has such debt, the check for any remaining funds after offset shall be made out to Plaintiff and 

mailed to counsel’s office at the address provided above.

IT IS SO ORDERED this day of _________________________, 2017

______________________________

U.S. District Judge/Magistrate Judge

PRESENTED BY:

By: /s/ DREW L. JOHNSON

Drew L. Johnson, OSB #75200

Of Attorneys for Plaintiff

March 2, 

/s/ Michael H. Simon

Case 6:15-cv-01873-SI Document 21 Filed 03/02/17 Page 2 of 2
#### Menashe Nachshon, Appellant, v Valley Forge Insurance Company, Respondent.

Special Term properly denied the plaintiff’s motion for a protective order. In view of the defendant’s arson defense and the fact that photographs and the visual representations of the subject premises which was damaged by fire can no longer be created, the defendant is entitled to disclosure of the plaintiff’s individual and corporate income tax returns and his expert’s photographs and other visual representations of the subject premises. Mangano, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.
# C_2006103EN.01002601.xml

| 29.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/26

---

Publication of decisions by Member States to grant or revoke operating licenses pursuant to Article 13(4) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92 on licensing of air carriers (1)
   (2)

1

2

(2006/C 103/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

LITHUANIA

Operating licences revoked

Category A:   Operating licences without the restriction of Article 5(7)(a) of Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92

| Name of air carrier | Address of air carrier | Permitted to carry | Decision effective since |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| JSC „Aviapaslauga“ | Pievu str. 1 |
| Karmelava |
| LT–4301 Kaunus district |

Name of air carrier

Address of air carrier

Permitted to carry

Decision effective since

JSC „Aviapaslauga“

Pievu str. 1

Karmelava

LT–4301 Kaunus district

passengers, mail, cargo

17.3.2006

---

(1)  OJ L 240, 24.8.1992, p. 1.

1

(2)  Communicated to the European Commission before 31.8.2005.

2

---