alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INTERIM
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND BALANCE SHEETS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q COMMUNICATIONS & POWER
INDUSTRIES, INC. FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001000564
<NAME> COMMUNICATIONS & POWER INDUSTRIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-02-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           3,022
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   47,274
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     62,727
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               121,380
<PP&E>                                          71,141
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 232,342
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           98,216
<BONDS>                                        113,137
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           27,206
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (6,218)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   232,342
<SALES>                                        181,697
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               181,697
<CGS>                                          139,772
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  139,772
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,585
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,908
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (6,291)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       571
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,862)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,862)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C., SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the Annual Report of TMI Holdings, Inc(the "Company")
on  Form  10-KSB  for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2002, as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Scott
Siegel,  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

(1)     The  Report  fully  complies  with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)     Information  contained  in  the  Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.

Date:  May  23,  2003


                                                  /s/  Scott  Siegel
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                                    Scott Siegel
                                                        Chief Executive Officer,
                                              Chief Financial Officer, Secretary
                                                                    and Director




A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  TMI  Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by TMI Holdings, Inc. and
furnished  to  the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

<PAGE>
#### SMITH, Respondent, v. JUDSON et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

September 22, 1896.)

Action by J. Augustus Smith against John B. Judson and Alvah H. Rogers.

No opinion. Judgment of county court affirmed. All concur.
#### Miko Brothers, Inc. *v.*John Lucas

*J. Roger Shull,*in support of the motion.

Submitted April 2

decided April 8, 1975

The plaintiff’s motion requesting the transmittal to this court of the transcripts, pleadings and docket sheets referred to in the appendix to its brief in its appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Fairfield County is granted and the clerk is directed to transmit the same to this court.
Status of Developing Triennial 

Budget and Work Plan

Seth Shanahan

August 30, 2017
Ideas

TWG recommendation to AMWG

January February March April May June

Getting to a TWG Recommendation

2017 2017

Today

Apr May Jun Jul Aug

1st draft issued

4/10/2017

TWG meeting

4/20/2017

Notice of FACA suspension

5/9/2017

2nd draft issued

5/16/2017

Notice of TWG resumption

6/12/2017

3rd draft issued

7/1/2017

BAHG call

7/6/2017

BAHG call

7/13/2017

BAHG call

7/20/2017

BAHG call

7/27/2017

BAHG call

8/3/2017

BAHG call and comments submitted

8/4/2017

Final draft issued

8/18/2017

TWG 

meeting

8/30/2017

SAP review and comment on GCMRC TWP 5/18/2017 - 6/9/2017

SAP review and comment on Reclamation TWP 6/30/2017 - 7/24/2017

Timeline
TWG meets to provide 

input on the draft GCMRC 

and Reclamation TWP and 

provide a recommendation 

to the AMWG
A Layered Approach

TWG “individual” input

AHG “group” input

TWG “group” input

BAHG “group” input

AMWG input

TWG

Recommendation
TWG Task: 

Provide Input and Make Recommendation

• Consider BAHG input

• Group exercise to reach consensus

• Green card – no concerns, support 

• Yellow card – need more info or minor concerns, would not block consensus

• Red card – major concerns, will block consensus
# L_2010090EN.01002701.xml

| 10.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 90/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 90/27

---

Corrigendum to Commission Decision 2009/488/EC, Euratom of 11 June 2009 on the conclusion of a Memorandum of Understanding between the European Commission and the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 161 of 24 June 2009
  )

On page 15, concluding sentence and signatures:

for:

‘Done in duplicate at Brussels, 17 June 2009.

For CERN

Torsten ÅKESSON

President of the CERN Council

Rolf-Dieter HEUER

Director-General of the CERN

For the Commission

Janez POTOČNIK

Member of the Commission
  ’

read:

‘Done in duplicate in ... on ...

For the European Commission

...

For CERN

...’

---
Humpback Chub in the Little Colorado 

Monitoring of Juveniles, Sub-Adults, 

Adults and Translocations

David Van Haverbeke, Kirk Young, Denn

Stone, Mike Pillow - USFWS 
LCR HBC Monitoring & 

Translocation Objective

 Conduct long term monitoring of humpba

(Gila cypha) and other fishes in the Little Colorado River via closed mark-recapture CPUE indices. 

 Translocate juvenile humpback chub from

the Little Colorado River to assist in recovefforts. 
Effort 

Typical trip = ~13.8 net sites/km minimu

~540 net nights/trip or ~12,500 net hours/t
Observed species composition in 

using hoop nets (2000-2015) 
Spring bluehead and flannelmouth su

CPUEs in LCR during blue water tri
Annual spring abundances of humpbac

≥ 150 mm and 

≥ 200 mm in lower 13.6 

LCR 
Annual fall abundances of humpback c

150 mm and 

≥ 200 mm in lower 13.6 km 
Spring LCR 150-199 mm hump

chub & current trout removal tr
Spring abundances and CPUEs of HBC 

100-149 mm size class (roughly age
Fall abundances and CPUEs of H

100 mm (age-0) 
Cohort tracking – Fall age-0 to sp

age-1 to next spring age-2 
Summary

 LCR still dominated by native species (~9 All three large bodied native fish are sho

signs of a decline during spring spawning season. HBC display the most recent sigpotential decline. 

 At this time, we are uncertain if this appa

decline is real, and if so, what may be ca

 We have the ability to track abundances 

different size classes using closed markrecapture, although tracking the age-0 cothe most problematic (VIE tagging vs PIT tagging). 
Chute Falls Monitoring 
Number of HBC translocated each 

(black bars) and abundance of adu

above Chute Falls (rkm 14.1-17
Abundance of adult HBC in Lo

Atomizer reach (rkm 13.7-14
Provisional: Do 

Apparent Survival of translocated 

(100-130 mm) vs lower LCR (100-13

Provisional: Do 
Thank You
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 National Clonal Germplasm Repository: Corvallis, OR
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Plant Collections
                        Home
                                    Plant Collecting Expeditions
                                    Germplasm CGC Reports
                                    GRIN-Global
                                    Outreach
                                    Documents
                    USDASearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Corvallis, Oregon National Clonal Germplasm Repository





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Research Programs and Projects at this LocationARS research is organized into National Programs. Within each National Program are research projects. Listed below are  the National Programs and research projects currently conducted at this location.
Clicking on a National Program (NP) will take you  to the main ARS site for more information on the program. Clicking on a research  project title will take you to more information on the project.  Current View: All Projects   Show All Projects ||
         Appropriated Projects Only


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
# C_2009313EN.01000401.xml

| 22.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5607 — Avaya/Nortel Enterprise Solutions)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 313/02

On 18 November 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5607. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5607. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1767

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to require notification

of recalls of drugs and devices, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 16, 1998

Mr. DODD introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

A BILL

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to

require notification of recalls of drugs and devices, and

for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Drug and Device Re5 call Reporting Act of 1998’’.

6 SEC. 2. RECALLS.

7 Subchapter E of chapter V of the Federal Food,

8 Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360bbb et seq.) is

9 amended by adding at the end the following:
2

•S 1767 IS

1 ‘‘SEC. 564. NOTIFICATION OF RECALLS.

2 ‘‘(a) NOTIFICATION TO CUSTOMERS.—A pharmacy

3 that receives notice from a recalling firm regarding a Class

4 I or Class II recall of a drug or device shall provide notifi5 cation about the recall to customers that received the drug

6 or device as follows:

7 ‘‘(1) In the case of a drug or device dispensed

8 by the pharmacy to customers on the prescription of

9 a licensed practitioner, by providing, at a minimum,

10 written notification to each of the customers.

11 ‘‘(2) In the case of another drug or device, by

12 public display in the pharmacy of a notice regarding

13 the recall.

14 ‘‘(b) CIVIL PENALTY.—Any pharmacy that violates

15 subsection (a) shall be liable to the United States for a

16 civil penalty in an amount not to exceed $10,000 for each

17 such violation.

18 ‘‘(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section:

19 ‘‘(1) CLASS I OR CLASS II.—The term ‘Class I’

20 or ‘Class II’ refers to the corresponding designation

21 given recalls in subpart A of part 7 of title 21, Code

22 of Federal Regulations, or a successor regulation.

23 ‘‘(2) RECALL.—The term ‘recall’ means—

24 ‘‘(A) a recall, as defined in subpart A of

25 part 7 of title 21, Code of Federal Regulations,

26 or a successor regulation; and
3

•S 1767 IS

1 ‘‘(B) a recall under section 518(e).

2 ‘‘(3) RECALLING FIRM.—The term ‘recalling

3 firm’ means—

4 ‘‘(A) a recalling firm, as defined in subpart

5 A of part 7 of title 21, Code of Federal Regula6 tions, or a successor regulation; and

7 ‘‘(B) a person subject to an order issued

8 under section 518(e)(1).’’.

Æ
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute 

controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance 

with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure.

NO. COA13-739

NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS

Filed: 21 January 2014

JONATHAN HENSLEE,

Plaintiff

v. Industrial Commission

No. TA-22724

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT

OF PUBLIC SAFETY,

Defendant

Appeal by plaintiff from decision and order entered 20 

March 2013 by the North Carolina Industrial Commission. Heard 

in the Court of Appeals 30 December 2013.

Plaintiff-appellant Jonathan Henslee, pro se.

Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Associate Attorney General 

Adrian W. Dellinger, for defendant-appellee North Carolina 

Department of Public Safety.

HUNTER, JR., Robert N., Judge.

Plaintiff Jonathan Henslee appeals from a decision and 

order of the North Carolina Industrial Commission (“the 

Commission”) denying his claim pursuant to the Tort Claims Act. 

We dismiss the appeal.
-2-

Plaintiff had a statutory right to appeal to this Court 

from the Commission’s final decision and order. N.C. Gen. Stat. 

§ 7A-29(a) (2013). However, “‘[w]ithout proper notice of 

appeal, the appellate court acquires no jurisdiction and neither 

the court nor the parties may waive the jurisdictional 

requirements even for good cause shown under Rule 2 [of the 

Rules of Appellate Procedure].’” Finley Forest Condo. Ass’n v. 

Perry, 163 N.C. App. 735, 741, 594 S.E.2d 227, 231 (2004) 

(internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Therefore, an 

appellant’s failure to file a written notice of appeal and 

include the notice in the record on appeal are sufficient 

grounds to dismiss the appeal. In re Me.B., 181 N.C. App. 597, 

600, 640 S.E.2d 407, 409 (2007).

Here, plaintiff’s record on appeal does not contain a 

written notice of appeal to this Court from the Commission’s 

final order and decision, and plaintiff has failed to satisfy 

the jurisdictional requirement of demonstrating he filed written 

notice of appeal. Although plaintiff is acting pro se, he must 

still comply with the Rules of Appellate Procedure. Bledsoe v. 

County of Wilkes, 135 N.C. App. 124, 125, 519 S.E.2d 316, 317 

(1999). Therefore, in the absence of a notice of appeal in the 

record on appeal, plaintiff’s appeal is subject to dismissal.
-3-

Finally, we note that plaintiff has not petitioned this 

Court for a writ of certiorari requesting review of the 

Commission’s order, and “[i]t is not the role of the appellate 

courts . . . to create an appeal for an appellant.” Viar v. 

N.C. DOT, 359 N.C. 400, 402, 610 S.E.2d 360, 361, reh’g denied, 

359 N.C. 643, 617 S.E.2d 662 (2005). Accordingly, we dismiss 

the appeal.

Dismissed.

Chief Judge MARTIN and Judge DILLON concur.

Report per Rule 30(e).
BILLY J. WILLIAMS, OSB #901366

United States Attorney

District of Oregon

STUART A. WEXLER

Trial Attorney, Tax Division

Stuart.A.Wexler@usdoj.gov

RYAN R. RAYBOULD

Trial Attorney, Tax Division

Ryan.R.Raybould@usdoj.gov

1000 SW Third Ave, Suite 600

Portland, OR 97204-2902

Telephone: (503) 727-1000

Attorneys for United States of America

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

WINSTON SHROUT,

Defendant.

3:15-cr-00438-JO

GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO SEAL

GOVERNMENT’S UNOPPOSED 

MOTION FOR RULE 15 DEPOSITION 

AND JOINT MOTION FOR 

CONTINUANCE OF JURY TRIAL 

DATE

The United States of America, by Billy J. Williams, Acting United States Attorney for 

the District of Oregon, and Ryan R. Raybould, Trial Attorney, Tax Division, hereby requests the 

Court issue an order allowing the government to file under seal the Government’s Unopposed 

/ / / / /

/ / / / /

/ / / / /

/ / / / /

Case 3:15-cr-00438-JO Document 62 Filed 09/30/16 Page 1 of 3
Government’s Motion to Seal Government’s Unopposed Motion For Rule 15 

Deposition And Joint Motion For Continuance Of Jury Trial Date

Page 2

Motion For Rule 15 Deposition and Joint Motion For Continuance of Jury Trial Date in the 

above-captioned case. 

This motion contains sensitive personal information.

Dated this 30th day of September, 2016.

Respectfully submitted,

BILLY J. WILLIAMS

United States Attorney

/s/ Ryan R. Raybould

RYAN R. RAYBOULD

STUART A. WEXLER

Trial Attorneys, Tax Division

(202) 305-3167

Case 3:15-cr-00438-JO Document 62 Filed 09/30/16 Page 2 of 3
Government’s Motion to Seal Government’s Unopposed Motion For Rule 15 

Deposition And Joint Motion For Continuance Of Jury Trial Date

Page 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on September 30, 2016, I caused the foregoing to be filed with the 

Clerk of the Court. Additionally, a copy of the foregoing was emailed to the defendant at 

milieannjones@gmail.com and emailed to advisory counsel at Ruben_Iniguez@fd.org. 

/s/ Ryan R. Raybould 

Ryan R. Raybould

Trial Attorney, Tax Division

Case 3:15-cr-00438-JO Document 62 Filed 09/30/16 Page 3 of 3
Case 3:15-cv-01857-SI Document 423 Filed 04/15/21 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:15-cv-01857-SI Document 423 Filed 04/15/21 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:15-cv-01857-SI Document 423 Filed 04/15/21 Page 3 of 3
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Digital Lightwave, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), I James Green, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: April 13, 2004





By: /s/ James Green




James Green


Chief Executive Officer and President
EXHIBIT 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the "Report") of PYR
Energy Corporation (the "Company") for the year ended August 31, 2003, D. Scott
Singdahlsen, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
the undersigned's knowledge and belief: (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  December 15, 2003                   /s/  D. Scott Singdahlsen
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           D. Scott Singdahlsen
                                           Chief Financial Officer