alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Water Management and Conservation Research: Maricopa, AZ
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Research Units
                        Main Page - ALARC
                                    Pest Management and Biocontrol Unit
                                    Plant Physiology and Genetics Unit
                                    Western Regional Biomass Research Center
                    About UsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Maricopa, Arizona U.S. Arid Land Agricultural Research Center Water Management and Conservation Research People & Locations







James L Schlegel
                        Water Management and Conservation Research

                        




                        
                        Information Technology Specialist
                        Phone: (520) 316-6385
                        
                        
                        Fax: (520) 316-6330(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
DOMINIX, INC.
                            (A DELAWARE CORPORATION)

                     CODE OF ETHICS FOR FINANCIAL EXECUTIVES

      Each of the Financial  Executives of Dominix,  Inc. (the "Company")  shall
adhere to and advocate the following principles and  responsibilities  governing
their  professional  and ethical  conduct.  For purposes of this Code of Ethics,
Financial  Executive  is  defined  as the  Chief  Executive  Officer,  the Chief
Financial  Officer  and  any  other  senior  officer  with  financial  oversight
responsibilities:

      1. Act with honesty and integrity,  avoiding actual or apparent  conflicts
of interest in personal and professional relationships.

      2. Provide information that is accurate,  complete,  objective,  relevant,
timely and understandable.

      3. Comply with rules and  regulations  of federal,  state,  provincial and
local governments, and other appropriate private and public regulatory agencies.

      4.  Act  in  good  faith,  responsibly,  with  due  care,  competence  and
diligence,  without  misrepresenting  material  facts  or  allowing  independent
judgement to be subordinated.

      5. Respect the  confidentiality  of information  acquired in the course of
the  Financial  Executive's  work except when  authorized  or otherwise  legally
obligated to disclose.  Confidential  information  acquired in the course of the
Financial Executive's work will not be used for personal advantage.

      6. Share knowledge and maintain skills important and relevant to the needs
of the Company.

      7.  Proactively  promote ethical  behavior as a responsible  partner among
peers in the Financial Executive's work environment.

      8. Achieve  responsible  use of and control over all assets and  resources
employed or entrusted to the Financial Executive.


                                       1
<PAGE>

                                  CERTIFICATION

         I certify that:

         1. I have read and understand the Company's Code of Ethics for
         Financial Executives.

         2. I will comply with the Code of Ethics for Financial Executives for
         as long as I am a Financial Executive.


         Signature:________________________

         Date:____________________________

         Print Name:_______________________


                                       2
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-60383

Summary Calendar

JAMES O. BOYCE,

PetitionerAppellant,

versus

MARY THOMS, Warden of Federal Medical

Center Lexington, As an Agent of the United States,

Respondent-Appellee.

____________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:99-CV-136-BrR

____________________________________

December 7, 1999

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

James O. Boyce, federal prisoner # 03723-043, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28

U.S.C. § 2241 petition. He argues that the district court erred in dismissing his petit io n o n

jurisdictional grounds and, alternativel y, that the district court erred in construing his petition as a

successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion.

The district court was correct in concluding that it lacked jurisdiction over the pleading as a

§ 2241 petition. S ee United States v. Gabor

, 905 F.2d 76, 78 (5th Cir. 1990). However, the petition

was properly construed as a § 2255 motion since Boyce challenges the validity of his sentence. S eeCo x v. Warden, Fed. Detention Ctr. , 911 F.2d 1111, 1113 (5th Cir. 1990); S olsona v. Warden

,

F.C.I. , 821 F.2d 1129, 1131-32 (5th Cir. 1987).

Boyce contends that his pe t it io n was a § 2241 petition even though it challenges a federal

sentence because he has shown that § 2255 relief is inadequate in his ca se since a § 2255 motion

would be barred as successive. C ox

, 911 F.2d at 1113. A prior unsuccessful § 2255 motion is not,

in and of itself, sufficient to establish the inadequacy or ineffectiveness of the remedy under § 2255.

See McGhee v. Hanberry

, 604 F.2d 9, 10 (5th Cir. 1979); see also Charles v. Chandler

, 180 F.3d 753,

757 (6th Cir. 1999); United States v. Barrett

, 178 F.3d 34, 50 (1st Cir. 19 99). The claims Boyce

seeks to raise are substantially the same claims he raised in his first § 2255 motion, recast in a § 2241

petition in an attempt to circumvent the rules prohibiting successive

§ 2255 motions. The dist rict court’s judgment dismissing Boyce’s motion as a successive § 2255

motion filed without prior authorization from this court is AFFIRMED.
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2140

AN ACT

To amend the Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act of 1992 to authorize the Secretary of the

Interior to participate in the design, planning, and construction of the Denver Water Reuse project.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 2140 ES

1 SECTION 1. DENVER WATER REUSE PROJECT.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Reclamation Projects Au3 thorization and Adjustment Act of 1992 (43 U.S.C. 390h

4 et seq.) is amended—

5 (1) by redesignating sections 1631, 1632, and

6 1633 (42 U.S.C. 390h–13, 390h–14, 390h–15) as

7 sections 1632, 1633, and 1634, respectively; and

8 (2) by inserting after section 1630 (43 U.S.C.

9 390h–12p) the following:

10 ‘‘SEC. 1631. DENVER WATER REUSE PROJECT.

11 ‘‘(a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary, in coopera12 tion with the appropriate State and local authorities, may

13 participate in the design, planning, and construction of the

14 Denver Water Reuse project to reclaim and reuse water

15 in the service area of the Denver Water Department of

16 the city and county of Denver, Colorado.

17 ‘‘(b) COST SHARE.—The Federal share of the cost

18 of the project described in subsection (a) shall not exceed

19 25 percent of the total cost.

20 ‘‘(c) LIMITATION.—The Secretary shall not provide

21 funds for the operation or maintenance of the project de22 scribed in subsection (a).’’.

23 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

24 (1) The table of contents in section 2 of the

25 Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment

26 Act of 1992 (43 U.S.C. prec. 371) is amended—
3

S 2140 ES

1 (A) by redesignating the items relating to

2 sections 1631, 1632, and 1633 as items relat3 ing to sections 1632, 1633, and 1634, respec4 tively, and

5 (B) by inserting after the item relating to

6 section 1630 the following:

‘‘Sec. 1631. Denver Water Reuse Project.’’.

7 (2) Section 1632(a) of the Reclamation Projects

8 Authorization and Adjustment Act of 1992 (as re9 designated by subsection (a)(1)) is amended by

10 striking ‘‘1630’’ and inserting ‘‘1631’’.

11 (3) Section 1633(c) of the Reclamation Projects

12 Authorization and Adjustment Act of 1992 (as re13 designated by subsection (a)(1)) is amended by

14 striking ‘‘section 1633’’ and inserting ‘‘section

15 1634’’.

16 (4) Section 1634 of the Reclamation Projects

17 Authorization and Adjustment Act of 1992 (as re18 designated by subsection (a)(1)) is amended by
4

S 2140 ES

1 striking ‘‘section 1632’’ and inserting ‘‘section

2 1633’’.

Passed the Senate October 7 (legislative day, October 2), 1998.

Attest:

Secretary.
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2140

AN ACT

To amend the Reclamation Projects Authorization

Water Reuse project.sign, planning, and construction of the DenverSecretary of the Interior to participate in the deand Adjustment Act of 1992 to authorize the
# L_2011131DE.01002701.xml

| 18.5.2011 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 131/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.5.2011

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 131/27

---

Berichtigung der Entscheidung 2009/567/EG der Kommission vom 9. Juli 2009 zur Festlegung von Umweltkriterien für die Vergabe eines Umweltzeichens für Textilerzeugnisse

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 197 vom 29. Juli 2009
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 197 vom 29. Juli 2009

Auf Seite 71, Artikel 1 Absatz 3:

anstatt:

„Für ‚Textilbekleidung und Accessoires‘ sowie für ‚Heimtextilien‘: Daunen, Federn, Membrane und Beschichtungen müssen bei der Berechnung des Prozentsatzes von Textilfasern berücksichtigt werden.“

muss es heißen:

„Für ‚Textilbekleidung und Accessoires‘ sowie für ‚Heimtextilien‘ gilt: Daunen, Federn, Membrane und Beschichtungen brauchen bei der Berechnung des Prozentsatzes von Textilfasern nicht berücksichtigt zu werden.“

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           3,330
<SECURITIES>                                   122,402
<RECEIVABLES>                                   91,239
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,423
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               275,900
<PP&E>                                         113,561
<DEPRECIATION>                                (56,554)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 417,304
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           99,079
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             1
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     315,697
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   417,304
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               373,693
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  265,511
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 53,027
<INCOME-TAX>                                    21,674
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             31,353
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    31,353
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .68
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of ImmunoCellular Therapeutics, Ltd. (the Company) hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

(i) The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|      |  |                |  |  |  |        |  |                                      
|----- |  | -------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: |  | March 25, 2008 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ Manish Singh                     
|      |  |                |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Manish Singh, Ph.D.                  
|      |  |                |  |  |  | Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit
32





SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATION





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of PacificHealth Laboratories, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), Frederick Duffner, President of the Company, and Stephen P. Kuchen,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
based on our knowledge:





1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





This
Certification shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for the purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





DATE:
October 29, 2010





By:
                  /s/
      Frederick DuffnerFrederick
      Duffner, President and CEO(Principal
      Executive Officer)DATE:
      October 29, 2010By:
                  /s/
      Stephen P. KuchenStephen
      P. Kuchen, Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting
Officer)
**EXHIBIT 12.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Thibault de Tersant, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Dassault Systèmes; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport; 4. The company’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the company and have:
 a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  b. [omitted pursuant to the guidance of Release No. 33-8238 (June 5, 2003)]  c. evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  d. disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The company’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and theaudit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: June 28, 2005         By:  /s/   Thibault de Tersant    Name:  Thibault de Tersant    Title:  Executive Vice President and
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A0938. KWAME ASKIA v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST

COMPANY.

This case originated as a dispossessory proceeding in magistrate court. 

Following an adverse ruling, Kwame Askia appealed the magistrate court’s decision

to the superior court. On August 5, 2014, the superior court entered final judgment

against Askia, who filed a notice of direct appeal to the Supreme Court on September

8, 2014. The Supreme Court transferred the case here upon finding no basis for

jurisdiction in that court. We, however, also lack jurisdiction.

First, because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate

court decision, Askia wasrequired to follow the discretionary appeal procedures. See

OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175)

(1995). His failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal.

Second, this appeal is untimely. Although a notice of appeal generally may

be filed within 30 days of entry of the order sought to be appealed, the underlying

subject matter of an appeal controls over the relief sought in determining the proper

appellate procedure. See Rebich v. Miles, 264 Ga. 467, 467-468 (448 SE2d 192)

(1994). The underlying subject matter of this case is a dispossessory judgment. And,

pursuant to OCGA § 44-7-56, an appeal from a dispossessory judgment must be filed

within seven days of the date the judgment was entered. See Ray M. Wright, Inc. v.

Jones, 239 Ga. App. 521 (521 SE2d 456) (1999). Here, Askia filed his notice of

appeal 34 days after the superior court’s order was entered. For these reasons, we

lack jurisdiction to review this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

February 04, 2015
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

02/04/2015
UNITED STATES’ MOTION TO DISMISS INFORMATION AND AMENDED 

INFORMATION Page 1

BILLY J. WILLIAMS, OSB #901366

United States Attorney

District of Oregon

DOUGLAS W. FONG, OSB #842195

Assistant United States Attorney

doug.fong@usdoj.gov

310 West 6th Avenue

Medford, Oregon 97501

Telephone: (541) 776-3564

Facsimile: (541) 776-3583

Attorneys for the United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

KENNETH W. MEDENBACH,

 Defendant.

Case No. 1:15-CR-00407-MC

UNITED STATES’ MOTION TO 

DISMISS INFORMATION AND 

AMENDED INFORMATION

The United States of America, by Billy J. Williams, United States Attorney 

for the District of Oregon, and Douglas W. Fong, Assistant United States Attorney, 

moves pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 48(a) for an order dismissing the 

//

//

//

//

//

Case 1:15-cr-00407-MC Document 70 Filed 08/11/16 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES’ MOTION TO DISMISS INFORMATION AND AMENDED 

INFORMATION Page 2

Information filed 11/13/2015, ECF #1 and the Amended Information filed 3/22/2016, 

ECF #29 on the grounds that both of these filings have been superseded by the 

Second Amended Information filed 3/30/2016, ECF #30.

Dated this 11th day of August 2016.

Respectfully submitted,

BILLY J. WILLIAMS

United States Attorney

s/ Douglas W. Fong 

DOUGLAS W. FONG

Assistant United States Attorney

Case 1:15-cr-00407-MC Document 70 Filed 08/11/16 Page 2 of 2