FY-2004 GCDAMP BUDGET COMPARISON - BEFORE AND AFTER CUTS 

ID Project Descriptions 2003 Budget

2004 Budget 

NEEDS 

PROPOSED 

2004 Budget

2004 Total Difference 2004 IMPACTS

PROGRAM ADMINISTRATIONA Adaptive Management Work Group1 Personnel Costs 173,000 178,000 151,300 26,700 Reduction of 15% in staff costs and involvement2 AMWG Member Travel Reimbursement 10,000 13,000 13,000 03 Reclamation Travel 17,000 18,000 18,000 04 Facilitation Contract 25,000 25,000 21,250 3,750 Reduction in facilitation assistance5 Other 11,000 9,000 9,000 0B Technical Work Group1 Personnel Costs 81,000 81,000 68,850 12,150 Reduction of 15% in staff costs and involvement2 TWG Member Travel Reimbursement 10,000 15,000 15,000 03 Reclamation Travel 18,000 17,000 17,000 04 TWG Chair Reimbursement 25,000 25,000 21,250 3,750 Reduction in TWG leadership5 Other 2,000 2,000 2,000 0C Compliance Documents 26,000 26,000 26,000 0D Contract Administration 25,000 25,000 25,000 0

USBR SUBTOTAL 423,000 434,000 387,650 46,350

TRIBAL CONSULTATIONA Cooperative Agreements w/Tribes1 Hopi Tribe 80,000 80,000 80,000 02 Hualapai Tribe 80,000 80,000 80,000 03 Navajo Nation 80,000 80,000 80,000 04 Pueblo of Zuni 80,000 80,000 80,000 05 Southern Paiute 80,000 80,000 80,000 0B River Trip Logistics1 Hopi Tribe 15,000 15,000 0 15,000 Covered by GCMRC Terrestrial Monitoring and Tribal Outreach2 Hualapai Tribe 15,000 15,000 0 15,000 Covered by GCMRC Terrestrial Monitoring and Tribal Outreach3 Navajo Nation 15,000 15,000 0 15,000 Covered by GCMRC Terrestrial Monitoring and Tribal Outreach4 Pueblo of Zuni 15,000 15,000 0 15,000 Covered by GCMRC Terrestrial Monitoring and Tribal Outreach5 Southern Paiute 15,000 15,000 0 15,000 Covered by GCMRC Terrestrial Monitoring and Tribal Outreach

TRIBAL SUBTOTAL 475,000 475,000 400,000 75,000

USBR ACTIVITIES

Page 1 
FY-2004 GCDAMP BUDGET COMPARISON - BEFORE AND AFTER CUTS 

ID Project Descriptions 2003 Budget

2004 Budget 

NEEDS 

PROPOSED 

2004 Budget

2004 Total Difference 2004 IMPACTS

PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT FOR CULTURAL RESOURCES1 Reclamation Administration 50,000 50,000 42,500 7,500 Reduction of 15% in staff costs and involvement2 Database / GIS 25,000 03 NPS-GRCA Monitoring Costs 200,000 200,000 170,000 30,000 Reduction of 15% in staff costs and involvement4 NPS-GLCA Monitoring Costs 28,000 28,000 23,800 4,200 Reduction of 15% in staff costs and involvement

Subtotal NPS 228,000 193,800 34,200

5 GLCA and NN Treatment Plan 100,000 100,000 0 Reduction of 15% in PEP Plan --> defer to 2005

PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT SUBTOTAL 303,000 378,000 336,300 41,700

1 Mass Balance of Fine Sediment 420,000 420,000 02 FIST 500,000 500,000 04 Primary Productivity, Carbon Flux 59,000 59,000 05 Temperatures and Habitat Use Monitoring 200,000 200,000 06 Modeling EHF Sandbar Response 62,000 62,000 07 Coarse Sediment and Conceptual Modeling 49,000 49,000 08 Kanab Ambersnail Population 10,000 10,000 09 Foodbase Impacts of EHF Flows 50,000 50,000 010 Monitoring of Rainbow Trout Adult 0 0 011 Distribution of Spawning Redds 100,000 100,000 012 Determination of the Suppression Mechanism 125,000 125,000 013 Food Base Impacts of Fluctuating Flows 60,000 60,000 014 Mechanical Removal 586,000 586,000 015 Rainbow Trout Diet Analysis 123,000 123,000 016 Predation of Humpback Chub 86,000 86,000 017 Sediment Deposition in Arroyos 25,000 25,000 018 Impacts to Concessionaires/Anglers 0 0 019 Changes in Camping Beaches 25,000 25,000 020 Administrative Support 5,000 5,000 021 Technical Support - Computer 21,000 21,000 022 Technical Support - Survey Equipment 32,000 32,000 0

EXP FLOW SUBTOTAL 2,538,000 2,538,000 0

EXPERIMENTAL FLOWS

Page 2 
FY-2004 GCDAMP BUDGET COMPARISON - BEFORE AND AFTER CUTS 

ID Project Descriptions 2003 Budget

2004 Budget 

NEEDS 

PROPOSED 

2004 Budget

2004 Total Difference 2004 IMPACTS

HUMPBACK CHUB PLAN ACTIONS1 Willow Beach Genetics Assessment 120,000 0 120,000 Need for project still to be determined2 30-Mile Genetics Refugium 125,000 0 125,000 Need for project still to be determined3 HBC Genetics Evaluation 51,000 0 0 Funded by GCMRC in 20014 Feasibility of HBC Augmentation 23,000 0 0 0 To be completed in 20035 HBC Translocation to Tributaries 25,000 50,000 50,000 06 TCD (see below) 0 (Funded by USBR Appropriations only)7 Dam Operations Experiment 150,000 50,000 100,000 Potential additional costs for 2004 experimental flow8 Sediment/Turbidity Augmentation 210,000 50,000 160,000 Would only address the turbidity pottion of this project9 Scientific/Recreation Impact Assessement 41,000 0 41,00010 Bright Angel Non-native Fish Removal (see below) 0 (Funded through NPS fee demo funds only)11 Tributary Non-native Fish Survey/Removal 100,000 50,000 50,00012 LCR Confluence NNF Mechanical Removal 0 0 0 (Funded under experimental flows project 17)13 Fish Monitoring below Diamond Creek 50,000 0 50,000 Need for project still to be better defined14 Invasive Species Management Plan 100,000 0 100,000 Project deferred until 200515 Monitoring Parasites and Diseases 105,000 0 105,000 Project deferred until 200516 Review of LCR Management Plan 20,000 0 20,000 Project deferred until 200517 Concurrent LCR/Mainstem HBC Pop Est 250,000 0 250,000 Project deferred until 200518 AMWG Outreach Program 85,000 0 85,000 Project to be accomplished by AMWG within existing agency bu19 Genetics Management Plan 40,000 40,000 020 LCR Spill Prevention Plan 0 0 Project deferred until 200521 LCR Pollution Control Plan 50,000 0 50,000 Project deferred until 2005

Subtotal 99,000 1,496,000 240,000 1,256,000

6 TCD 80,000 200,000 200,000 0 (Funded by USBR Appropriations only)10 Bright Angel Non-native Fish Removal 167,000 167,000 0 (Funded through NPS fee demo funds only)

Subtotal (lines 6 & 10) 367,000 367,000

HBC PLAN TOTAL 179,000 1,863,000 607,000 1,256,000

Page 3 
FY-2004 GCDAMP BUDGET COMPARISON - BEFORE AND AFTER CUTS 

ID Project Descriptions 2003 Budget

2004 Budget 

NEEDS 

PROPOSED 

2004 Budget

2004 Total Difference 2004 IMPACTS

USGS ACTIVITIESSCIENTIFIC ACTIVITIESA Terrestrial Ecosystem Activities1 Terrestrial Ecosystem Monitoring 624,000 460,000 164,000 Reduce sampling frequency and intensity

2 Kanab Ambersnail Monitoring 86,000 79,000 7,000 Reduce Scope - eliminate 100,000cfs survey, focus on habitat

3 New Research in Terrestrial Ecosystems 69,000 0 69,000 Eliminate

4 Mapping Holocene Deposits 113,000 0 113,000 Eliminate

5 Habitat Map & Inventory 0 48,000 -48,000 Salary funds to complete project in FY04

6 Cultural Data Base Plan 25,000 0 25,000 Cultural database will be integrated into IT database, funds mov

7 Kanab Ambersnail Taxonomy 26,000 0 26,000 Project funded by USGS Appropriations, funds moved to B2

B Aquatic Ecosystem Activities1 Monitoring Aquatic Foodbase 271,000 248,000 23,000 Change emphasis to carbon budget, retain fixed foodbase sites

2 Status & Trends of Downstream Fish 856,000 820,000 36,000 Reduce downstream native fish sampling

3 Status & Trends of Lee's Ferry Trout 162,000 161,000 1,000 Salary Adjustment 

4 IWQP - Downstream 200,000 179,000 21,000 Increase monitors, temperature sites-eliminate WRD Contract

5 Native & Non-Native Species 77,000 0 77,000 Eliminate-being done under experimental flows

6 Captive Breeding Program 50,000 0 50,000 Eliminate-conducted feasibility w/reprogrammed $ in FY03

C Integrated Activities

1 Fine-Grained Sediment Storage 462,000 459,000 3,000

3 of 11 monitoring reaches eliminated in FY04, increased emphsites

2 Streamflow & Fine-Sediment Transport 609,000 480,000 129,000 Glen gage eliminated, DC flux errors unresolved

3 Coarse-Grained Sediment Inputs 145,000 135,000 10,000 Reduce emphasis on physical habitats & fish

4 Sediment Transport Modeling 256,000 231,000 25,000 Project scope intact, minus Year-3 field studies

5 Control Network 87,000 86,000 1,000 Salary Adjustment 

6 Channel Mapping 126,000 128,000 -2,000 Salary Adjustment

D Other Research Activities1 Unsolicited Proposals 89,000 0 89,000 Eliminate for FY04

2 AMWG/TWG Requests 64,000 0 64,000 Eliminate for FY04

3 In-House Research 22,000 0 22,000 Eliminate for FY04

4 Tribal Outreach 35,000 45,000 -10,000 Salary Redistribution

5 Public Outreach Involvement Plan Imple. 15,000 0 15,000 Project to be accomplished by AMWG within existing agency bu6 Cultural Synthesis & Data Report 11,000 0 11,000 Eliminate this project, funds moved to C1

7 Cultural Affiliation Study 55,000 0 55,000 Eliminate this project, funds moved to C1

Page 4 
FY-2004 GCDAMP BUDGET COMPARISON - BEFORE AND AFTER CUTS 

ID Project Descriptions 2003 Budget

2004 Budget 

NEEDS 

PROPOSED 

2004 Budget

2004 Total Difference 2004 IMPACTS

ADMINISTRATIVE & TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICESE Administrative & Management1 Administrative Operations(1) 819,000 620,000 199,000 $190k Administrative Costs move to the Cost Center level; $9k 

2 Program Planning & Management 303,000 274,000 29,000 Salary Redistribution

3 AMWG/TWG 55,000 45,000 10,000 Salary Redistribution

4 Independent Reviews 171,000 172,000 -1,000 Salary Adjustment

F Technical Support Services1 Geographic Information System 147,000 160,000 -13,000 Salary Adjustment and Deferred Implementation

2 Data Base Management System 100,000 128,000 -28,000 Salary Adjustment and Deferred Implementation

3 Library 76,000 79,000 -3,000 Salary Adjustment 

4 Survey Operations 130,000 126,000 4,000 Salary Adjustment and Deferred Implementation5 Systems Administration 261,000 242,000 19,000 Salary Adjustment and Deferred Implementation

6 Aerial Photography 514,000 363,000 151,000 Salary Adjustment and Deferred Implementation

0

USGS OVERHEAD (Bureau Share 11%) (3) 363,000 363,000 0 (on $3.8M)

USGS OVERHEAD (Cost Center Share 4%) 132,000 132,000 0 (on $3.8M)

USGS OVERHEAD (Bur. Special Rate 2%) 58,000 58,000 0 (on $3.0M)

USGS OVERHEAD (Special CC Rate 2%) 58,000 58,000 0 (on $3.0M)

USGS SUBTOTAL 7,722,000 6,379,000 1,343,000TOTAL PROGRAM COSTS 1,380,000 13,410,000 10,647,950 2,762,050USBR & USGS Power Revenues Under 2001 Cap 8,175,000 8,420,000 8,420,000 0USBR Power Revenues Carry Over (Est.) FY 2003 100,000 100,000USBR Power Revenues Carry Over from FY 2002 180,000 180,000USGS Power Revenues Carry Over (Est.) 500,000 500,000USGS Appropriations (4) 595,000 945,000 945,000 0

USBR Appropriations (5) 342,000 295,000 295,000 0NPS Fee Demo Funds (6) 167,000 167,000 0

NPS Appropriations (4) 262,000 95,000 95,000 0

FWS Appropriations (4) 262,000 95,000 95,000 0BIA Appropriations (4) 262,000 95,000 95,000 0TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDS 9,898,000 10,112,000 10,892,000 780,000

USGS OVERHEAD COSTSAVAILABLE FUNDS

Page 5 
PROJECTED FUNDING SHORTFALL

(1)(2) CPI Adjustment

Actual AMP funds received in FY-2003 6,603,000Increased by 3.0 CPI 198,090FY-2004 Budget Adjusted for CPI - rounded 6,800,000

(3) Overhead Calculations: 3,800,000 3,000,000 Formula:

 USGS Overhead (Bureau Share) 363,000 (Available to spend x Bureau Overhead rate), $3,800,000/1.15 x .11 USGS Overhead (Cost Center Share) 132,000 (Available to spend x Cost Center Overhead rate), $3,800,000/1.15 x .04 USGS Special Rate (Bureau Share) 58,000 (Available to spend x Special Bureau Overhead rate), $3,000,000/1.15 x .02 USGS Special Rate (Cost Center Share) 58,000 (Available to spend x Special Cost Center Overhead rate), $3,000,000/1.15 x .0Total Overhead: 611,000

(4)(5)(6)

GCMRC budgets are prepared in advance with an estimated 3% CPI inflation factor. Current year budgets are then adjusted with the actual CPI factor. The actual CPI rates have been FY01 - FY03, the cumulative effect is a decrease of $311k in the revised budget request for FY-04.Note: USGS Salary adjustments were made to reflect costs from the most recent salary tables and were redistributed to correspond to the changes in project work. 

Decreases are a result of the USGS assessment. The admin. officer, admin. assistant, staff student assistant and 1/2 of the secretary positions have been transferred to the Southwest Bbe funded by the assessment. Administrative Support will be provided by the SBSC Administrative Services Group. Note: Total Cost Center assessment for FY-04 is $190,000. Note: USGS special "pass-through" rate is applied on $3m for contracts and agreements. 

Consists of funds for experimental flows,and tribal participationConsists of funds for experimental flows,temperature control device and tribal participationFunds applied to Bright Angel non-native fish contol

Page 6