Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 166 / Tuesday, August 31, 2021 / Notices 48789 

1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 

2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[SEC File No. 270–491; OMB Control No. 

3235–0548] 

Proposed Collection; Comment 

Request 

Upon Written Request, Copies Available 

From: Securities and Exchange 

Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 

100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 

20549–2736 

Extension: 

Rule 35d–1 

Notice is hereby given that, pursuant 

to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities 

and Exchange Commission (the 

‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments 

on the collection of information 

summarized below. The Commission 

plans to submit this existing collection 

of information to the Office of 

Management and Budget for extension 

and approval. 

Rule 35d–1 (17 CFR 270.35d–1) under 

the Investment Company Act of 1940 

(15 U.S.C. 80a–1 et seq.) defines as 

‘‘materially deceptive and misleading’’ 

for purposes of Section 35(d), among 

other things, a name suggesting that a 

registered investment company or series 

thereof (a ‘‘fund’’) focuses its 

investments in a particular type of 

investment or investments, in 

investments in a particular industry or 

group of industries, or in investments in 

a particular country or geographic 

region, unless, among other things, the 

fund adopts a certain investment policy. 

Rule 35d–1 further requires either that 

the investment policy is fundamental or 

that the fund has adopted a policy to 

provide its shareholders with at least 60 

days prior notice of any change in the 

investment policy (‘‘notice to 

shareholders’’). The rule’s notice to 

shareholders provision is intended to 

ensure that when shareholders purchase 

shares in a fund based, at least in part, 

on its name, and with the expectation 

that it will follow the investment policy 

suggested by that name, they will have 

sufficient time to decide whether to 

redeem their shares in the event that the 

fund decides to pursue a different 

investment policy. 

The Commission estimates that there 

are approximately 11,502 open-end and 

closed-end funds that have names that 

are covered by the rule. The 

Commission estimates that of these 

11,502 funds, approximately 38 will 

provide prior notice to shareholders 

pursuant to a policy adopted in 

accordance with this rule per year. The 

Commission estimates that the annual 

burden associated with the notice to 

shareholders requirement of the rule is 

20 hours per response, for annual total 

of 760 hours per year. 

Estimates of average burden hours are 

made solely for the purposes of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act and are not 

derived from a comprehensive or even 

representative survey or study of the 

costs of Commission rules and forms. 

Providing prior notice to shareholders 

under rule 35d–1 is not mandatory. An 

investment company may choose to 

have a name that does not indicate that 

the fund focuses its investments in a 

particular type of investment or 

investments, or in investments in a 

particular industry or group of industry. 

If an investment company does choose 

such a name, it will only need to 

provide prior notice to shareholders of 

a change in its 80% investment policy 

if it first has adopted a policy to provide 

notice and then has decided to change 

this investment policy. The information 

provided under rule 35d–1 will not be 

kept confidential. An agency may not 

conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 

required to respond to, a collection of 

information unless it displays a 

currently valid OMB control number. 

Written comments are invited on: (a) 

Whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

agency, including whether the 

information will have practical utility; 

(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate 

of the burden of the collection of 

information; (c) ways to enhance the 

quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information collected; and (d) ways to 

minimize the burden of the collection of 

information on respondents, including 

through the use of automated collection 

techniques or other forms of information 

technology. Consideration will be given 

to comments and suggestions submitted 

in writing within 60 days of this 

publication. 

Please direct your written comments 

to David Bottom, Director/Chief 

Information Officer, Securities and 

Exchange Commission, C/O Cynthia 

Roscoe, 100 F Street NE, Washington, 

DC 20549; or send an email to: PRA_

Mailbox@sec.gov. 

Dated: August 25, 2021. 

Jill M. Peterson, 

Assistant Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2021–18700 Filed 8–30–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[Release No. 34–92754; File No. SR–Phlx– 

2021–47] 

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq 

PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing and 

Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed 

Rule Change To Amend Equity 7, 

Section 3 To Adopt an Enhanced 

Market Quality Program 

August 25, 2021. 

Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2

notice is hereby given that on August 

12, 2021, Nasdaq PHLX LLC 

(‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities 

and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or 

‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule 

change as described in Items I, II, and 

III, below, which Items have been 

prepared by the Exchange. The 

Commission is publishing this notice to 

solicit comments on the proposed rule 

change from interested persons. 

I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Terms of Substance of 

the Proposed Rule Change 

The Exchange proposes to amend 

Equity 7, Section 3 to adopt an 

Enhanced Market Quality Program and 

a related credit, as described further 

below. 

The text of the proposed rule change 

is available on the Exchange’s website at 

https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/ 

rulebook/phlx/rules, at the principal 

office of the Exchange, and at the 

Commission’s Public Reference Room. 

II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Purpose of, and 

Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule 

Change 

In its filing with the Commission, the 

Exchange included statements 

concerning the purpose of and basis for 

the proposed rule change and discussed 

any comments it received on the 

proposed rule change. The text of these 

statements may be examined at the 

places specified in Item IV below. The 

Exchange has prepared summaries, set 

forth in sections A, B, and C below, of 

the most significant aspects of such 

statements. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
48790 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 166 / Tuesday, August 31, 2021 / Notices 

3Example 1: A member firm quotes an average of 

250 symbols a day in tape A over the 30% time 

threshold in a particular month. The Fixed Payment 

due to such firm is calculated as follows: 51 (the 

number of symbols over 199) times $25, which 

equals to $1,275 for the month. This example shows 

a tape A Tier 2 Fixed Payment. Example 2: A 

member firm quotes an average of 350 symbols a 

day in tape A over the 30% time threshold in a 

particular month. The Fixed Payment due to such 

firm is calculated as follows: $2,500 plus 51 (the 

number of symbols over 299) times $200, which 

equals to $12,700 for the month. This example 

shows a tape A Tier 3 Fixed Payment. 

A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Purpose of, and 

Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule 

Change 

1. Purpose 

The purpose of the proposed rule 

change is to amend Equity 7, Section 3 

to adopt an Enhanced Market Quality 

Program and a related credit. 

The Enhanced Market Quality 

Program is intended to provide 

supplemental incentives to member 

organizations that meet certain quality 

standards in acting as market makers for 

securities on the Exchange by 

incentivizing such member 

organizations to make a significant 

contribution to market quality by 

providing liquidity at the national best 

bid and offer (‘‘NBBO’’) in a large 

number of securities for a significant 

portion of the day. Specifically, the 

Exchange proposes to make a lump sum 

payment at the end of each month (a 

‘‘Fixed Payment’’) to a member 

organization to the extent that the 

member organization, through one or 

more of its MPIDs, quotes at the NBBO 

for at least a threshold percentage of the 

time during Market Hours in an average 

number of securities per day during the 

month, as specified below. On a daily 

basis, the Exchange will determine the 

number of securities in which each of a 

member organization’s MPIDs satisfied 

the NBBO requirement. The Exchange 

will aggregate all of a member 

organization’s MPIDs to determine the 

number of securities for purposes of the 

NBBO requirement. The program is 

open to all member organizations. A 

member organization may but is not 

required to be, a registered market 

maker in any security; thus, the program 

does not by itself impose a two-sided 

quotation obligation or convey any of 

the benefits associated with being a 

registered market maker. Accordingly, 

the program is designed to attract 

liquidity both from traditional market 

makers and from other firms that are 

willing to commit capital to support 

liquidity at the NBBO. 

For purposes of the Enhanced Market 

Quality Program, a member organization 

will be deemed to quote at the NBBO in 

a security if it quotes a displayed order 

of at least 100 shares in the security and 

prices the order at either the national 

best bid or the national best offer or both 

the national best bid and offer for the 

security. The Exchange will determine 

the amount of the Fixed Payment that it 

pays to a qualifying member 

organization by multiplying the average 

daily number of its qualifying securities 

during the month within the range set 

forth in the highest qualifying Tier 

(rounded to the nearest whole number) 

by the applicable amounts set forth in 

the following tables below and adding 

the specified lump sum, where 

applicable. For a particular Tape A 

security to count towards the threshold 

for qualifying for the Fixed Payment on 

a particular day, and receiving the Fixed 

Payment, a member organization has to 

quote such security at the NBBO for at 

least 30% of the time during Market 

Hours on that day. For a particular Tape 

B security to count towards the 

threshold for qualifying for the Fixed 

Payment on a particular day, and 

receiving the Fixed Payment, a member 

organization has to quote such security 

at the NBBO for at least 50% of the time 

during Market Hours on that day. A 

member organization that qualifies for 

the Fixed Payment for securities in each 

of Tapes A and B will receive Fixed 

Payments covering qualifying securities 

in both Tapes, but within each Tape, a 

member organization may only qualify 

for one Tier during a month.3

The Exchange proposes to set the tiers 

and the Fixed Payments as follows: 

TAPE A SECURITIES

Tiers 

Average daily number of securities quoted at the NBBO for 

at least 30% of the time during Market Hours during the 

month 

Fixed payment 

1 .............................. 0–199 ..................................................................................... $0 per qualified security per month. 

2 .............................. 200–299 ................................................................................. $25 per qualified security over 199. 

3 .............................. 300–399 ................................................................................. $2,500 + ($200 per qualified security over 299). 

4 .............................. 400–499 ................................................................................. $22,500 + ($300 per qualified security over 399). 

5 .............................. 500 or greater ........................................................................ $52,500 + ($400 per qualified security over 499). 

TAPE B SECURITIES

Tiers 

Average daily number of securities quoted at the NBBO for 

at least 50% of the time during Market Hours during the 

month 

Fixed payment 

1 .............................. 0–299 ..................................................................................... $0 per qualified security per month. 

2 .............................. 300–399 ................................................................................. $100 per qualified security over 299. 

3 .............................. 400–499 ................................................................................. $10,000 + ($200 per qualified security over 399). 

4 .............................. 500 or greater ........................................................................ $30,000 + ($300 per qualified security over 499). 

Through the use of this incentive 

program, the Exchange hopes to provide 

improved trading conditions for all 

market participants through narrower 

bid-ask spreads and increased depth of 

liquidity available at the inside market. 

In addition, the program reflects an 

effort to use financial incentives to 

encourage a wider variety of member 

organizations to make positive 

commitments to promote market 

quality. The Exchange believes that 

different member organizations may 

respond to different incentives, and 

therefore the Enhanced Market Quality 

Program is designed to promote market 

quality through quoting activity. The 

Exchange recognizes that while 

generally market participants will 

provide quotes with the intention of 

trading, market makers and liquidity 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 166 / Tuesday, August 31, 2021 / Notices 48791 

4 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). 

5 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5). 

6Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 

(June 9, 2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005) 

(‘‘Regulation NMS Adopting Release’’). 

7NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525 (D.C. Cir. 

2010). 

8 Id. at 539 (quoting Securities Exchange Act 

Release No. 59039 (December 2, 2008), 73 FR 

74770, 74782–83 (December 9, 2008) (SR– 

NYSEArca–2006–21)). 

9See Qualified Market Maker Program, Equity 7, 

Section 3(c). 

providers cannot control when counter 

parties choose to interact with those 

quotes and therefore the Exchange 

believes it is beneficial to the market to 

offer this incentive based on quoting 

activity directly. 

The Exchange notes that it will make 

the Fixed Payment in addition to other 

rebates or fees provided under Equity 7, 

Sections 3 (a)–(c). 

2. Statutory Basis 

The Exchange believes that its 

proposal is consistent with Section 6(b) 

of the Act,4 in general, and furthers the 

objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) 

of the Act,5 in particular, in that it 

provides for the equitable allocation of 

reasonable dues, fees and other charges 

among member organizations and 

issuers and other persons using any 

facility, and is not designed to permit 

unfair discrimination between 

customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. 

The Commission and the courts have 

repeatedly expressed their preference 

for competition over regulatory 

intervention in determining prices, 

products, and services in the securities 

markets. In Regulation NMS, while 

adopting a series of steps to improve the 

current market model, the Commission 

highlighted the importance of market 

forces in determining prices and SRO 

revenues and, also, recognized that 

current regulation of the market system 

‘‘has been remarkably successful in 

promoting market competition in its 

broader forms that are most important to 

investors and listed companies.’’ 6

Likewise, in NetCoalition v. Securities 

and Exchange Commission 7

(‘‘NetCoalition’’) the D.C. Circuit stated 

as follows: ‘‘[n]o one disputes that 

competition for order flow is ‘fierce.’ 

. . . As the SEC explained, ‘[i]n the U.S. 

national market system, buyers and 

sellers of securities, and the brokerdealers that act as their order-routing 

agents, have a wide range of choices of 

where to route orders for execution’; 

[and] ‘no exchange can afford to take its 

market share percentages for granted’ 

because ‘no exchange possesses a 

monopoly, regulatory or otherwise, in 

the execution of order flow from broker 

dealers’. . . .’’ 8

The Exchange believes that the 

proposed Enhanced Market Quality 

Program is reasonable because it is 

similar to other incentive programs 

offered by the Exchange for displayed 

orders that provide liquidity, like the 

Qualified Market Maker Program set 

forth in Equity 7, Sections 3(c). The 

proposed Fixed Payment will provide 

an opportunity to member organizations 

to receive an additional credit in return 

for certain levels of participation on the 

Exchange as measured by quoting at the 

NBBO. The proposed credit is set at a 

level that is reflective of the beneficial 

contributions of market participants that 

quote significantly at the NBBO for a 

wide range of symbols. The Exchange 

believes that it is appropriate to limit 

applicability of the proposed credit to 

displayed orders in securities in Tape A 

and Tape B, and set the credits higher 

for the Tape A securities, insofar as the 

Exchange seeks to incentivize member 

organizations to add liquidity to the 

Exchange in such securities and 

improve the market therefor. 

The Exchange believes that the 

proposed Fixed Payments set forth by 

the Enhanced Market Quality Program 

are an equitable allocation and are not 

unfairly discriminatory because the 

Exchange will offer the same credit to 

all similarly situated member 

organizations. Moreover, the proposed 

qualification criteria requires a member 

organization to quote significantly at the 

NBBO therefore contributing to market 

quality in a meaningful way on the 

Exchange. Any member organization 

may quote at the NBBO at the level 

required by the qualification criteria of 

the Enhanced Market Quality Program. 

The Exchange notes that it has a similar 

Qualified Market Maker Program in 

which member organizations are 

required to quote at the NBBO more 

than a certain amount of time during 

regular market hours.9 For these 

reasons, the Exchange believes that the 

proposed Enhanced Market Quality 

Program Fixed Payments and 

qualification criteria are an equitable 

allocation and are not unfairly 

discriminatory. 

The Exchange believes that the 

proposal is equitable and is not unfairly 

discriminatory because the Exchange 

proposes to offer the same Fixed 

Payments to all similarly situated 

member organizations. The Exchange 

also believes that it is equitable and not 

unfairly discriminatory to establish the 

Enhanced Market Quality Program only 

for Tape A and Tape B securities, and 

set the credits higher for the Tape A 

securities, because the Exchange has 

limited resources and the Exchange 

believes that the best current 

application of such limited resources is 

to improve the market quality for Tape 

A and Tape B securities, as proposed. 

B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement on Burden on Competition 

The Exchange does not believe that 

the proposed rule change will impose 

any burden on competition not 

necessary or appropriate in furtherance 

of the purposes of the Act. In terms of 

inter-market competition, the Exchange 

notes that it operates in a highly 

competitive market in which market 

participants can readily favor competing 

venues if they deem fee levels at a 

particular venue to be excessive, or 

rebate opportunities available at other 

venues to be more favorable. In such an 

environment, the Exchange must 

continually adjust its fees to remain 

competitive with other exchanges and 

with alternative trading systems that 

have been exempted from compliance 

with the statutory standards applicable 

to exchanges. Because competitors are 

free to modify their own fees in 

response, and because market 

participants may readily adjust their 

order routing practices, the Exchange 

believes that the degree to which fee 

changes in this market may impose any 

burden on competition is extremely 

limited. 

In this instance, the proposed changes 

to the Exchange’s credits provided to 

member organizations do not impose a 

burden on competition because the 

Exchange’s execution services are 

completely voluntary and subject to 

extensive competition both from other 

exchanges and from off-exchange 

venues. The proposed Fixed Payment 

provides member organizations with the 

opportunity to be given higher credits 

for quotations if they improve the 

market by providing significant quoting 

at the NBBO in a large number of 

securities which the Exchange believes 

will improve market quality. 

In terms of intra-market competition, 

the Exchange does not believe that the 

proposed rule change will impose any 

burden on competition not necessary or 

appropriate in furtherance of the 

purposes of the Act because the program 

is open to all member organizations on 

the same terms. 

In sum, the proposed changes are 

designed to make the Exchange a more 

desirable venue on which to transact; 

however, if the changes proposed herein 

are unattractive to market participants, 

it is likely that the Exchange will lose 

market share as a result. Accordingly, 

the Exchange does not believe that the 

proposed changes will impair the ability 

of member organizations or competing 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
48792 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 166 / Tuesday, August 31, 2021 / Notices 

10 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii). 11 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 

order execution venues to maintain 

their competitive standing in the 

financial markets. 

C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement on Comments on the 

Proposed Rule Change Received From 

Members, Participants, or Others 

No written comments were either 

solicited or received. 

III. Date of Effectiveness of the 

Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 

Commission Action 

The foregoing rule change has become 

effective pursuant to Section 

19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.10

At any time within 60 days of the 

filing of the proposed rule change, the 

Commission summarily may 

temporarily suspend such rule change if 

it appears to the Commission that such 

action is: (i) Necessary or appropriate in 

the public interest; (ii) for the protection 

of investors; or (iii) otherwise in 

furtherance of the purposes of the Act. 

If the Commission takes such action, the 

Commission shall institute proceedings 

to determine whether the proposed rule 

should be approved or disapproved. 

IV. Solicitation of Comments 

Interested persons are invited to 

submit written data, views, and 

arguments concerning the foregoing, 

including whether the proposed rule 

change is consistent with the Act. 

Comments may be submitted by any of 

the following methods: 

Electronic Comments 

• Use the Commission’s internet 

comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ 

rules/sro.shtml); or 

• Send an email to rule-comments@

sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– 

Phlx–2021–47 on the subject line. 

Paper Comments 

• Send paper comments in triplicate 

to Secretary, Securities and Exchange 

Commission, 100 F Street NE, 

Washington, DC 20549–1090. 

All submissions should refer to File 

Number SR–Phlx–2021–47. This file 

number should be included on the 

subject line if email is used. To help the 

Commission process and review your 

comments more efficiently, please use 

only one method. The Commission will 

post all comments on the Commission’s 

internet website (http://www.sec.gov/ 

rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the 

submission, all subsequent 

amendments, all written statements 

with respect to the proposed rule 

change that are filed with the 

Commission, and all written 

communications relating to the 

proposed rule change between the 

Commission and any person, other than 

those that may be withheld from the 

public in accordance with the 

provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be 

available for website viewing and 

printing in the Commission’s Public 

Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, 

Washington, DC 20549, on official 

business days between the hours of 

10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the 

filing also will be available for 

inspection and copying at the principal 

office of the Exchange. All comments 

received will be posted without change. 

Persons submitting comments are 

cautioned that we do not redact or edit 

personal identifying information from 

comment submissions. You should 

submit only information that you wish 

to make available publicly. All 

submissions should refer to File 

Number SR–Phlx–2021–47 and should 

be submitted on or before September 21, 

2021. 

For the Commission, by the Division of 

Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated 

authority.11

Jill M. Peterson, 

Assistant Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2021–18676 Filed 8–30–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 

[Disaster Declaration #17114 and #17115; 

Tennessee Disaster Number TN–00130] 

Presidential Declaration Amendment of 

a Major Disaster for the State of 

Tennessee 

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business 

Administration. 

ACTION: Amendment 1. 

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the 

Presidential declaration of a major 

disaster for the State of Tennessee 

(FEMA–4609–DR), dated 08/23/2021. 

Incident: Severe Storm and Flooding. 

Incident Period: 08/21/2021. 

DATES: Issued on 08/25/2021. 

Physical Loan Application Deadline 

Date: 10/22/2021. 

Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan 

Application Deadline Date: 05/23/2022. 

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan 

applications to: U.S. Small Business 

Administration, Processing and 

Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 

Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. 

Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, 

U.S. Small Business Administration, 

409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, 

Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205–6734. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice 

of the President’s major disaster 

declaration for the State of Tennessee, 

dated 08/23/2021, is hereby amended to 

include the following areas as adversely 

affected by the disaster: 

Primary Counties (Physical Damage and 

Economic Injury Loans): Dickson, 

Hickman, Houston. 

Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury 

Loans Only): 

Tennessee: Cheatham, Lewis, Maury, 

Montgomery, Stewart, Williamson. 

All other information in the original 

declaration remains unchanged. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance 

Number 59008) 

James Rivera, 

Associate Administrator for Disaster 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2021–18731 Filed 8–30–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8026–03–P 

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 

[Disaster Declaration #17119 and #17120; 

California Disaster Number CA–00340] 

Presidential Declaration of a Major 

Disaster for the State of California 

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business 

Administration. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the 

Presidential declaration of a major 

disaster for the State of California 

(FEMA–4610–DR), dated 08/24/2021. 

Incident: Wildfires. 

Incident Period: 07/14/2021 and 

continuing. 

DATES: Issued on 08/24/2021. 

Physical Loan Application Deadline 

Date: 10/25/2021. 

Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan 

Application Deadline Date: 05/24/2022. 

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan 

applications to: U.S. Small Business 

Administration, Processing and 

Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 

Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. 

Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, 

U.S. Small Business Administration, 

409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, 

Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205–6734. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is 

hereby given that as a result of the 

President’s major disaster declaration on 

08/24/2021, applications for disaster 

loans may be filed at the address listed 

above or other locally announced 

locations. The following areas have been 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES