alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Manhattan, Kansas (NBAF)
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home People & Locations







Meghan  Jackson
                        Office of The Director

                        




                        
                        Management and Program Analyst
                        Phone: (785) 712-3394
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Range Management Research: Las Cruces, NM
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Comprehensive Publications
                    Research SummarySearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Las Cruces, New Mexico Range Management Research Docs





- Landscape Toolbox
- Long Term Agricultural Research
- EcoTrends
- Long Term Ecological Research
- Ecological Site Descriptions
- Monitoring & Assessment
- Southwest Climate Hub
- Land Potential Knowledge System
- National Ecological Observatory Network
- JournalMap
- Assessment, Inventory, and Monitoring (AIM)
- Data Catalogs

Selected Maps (1)headline bar


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
0 

5 

10 

15 

20 

25 

30 

WATER TEMPERATURE (C)

J F M A M J J A S O N D

MONTH

TCD TEMPERATURE SCENARIOS

Scenario 1

Scenario 4

Scenario 2

Scenario 3

Hypothetical temperature control device scenarios from the Grand Canyon Monitoring and

Research Center’s draft research and monitoring plan.

SCENARIO 1:Operate withdrawals that closely mimic pre-dam thermal warming of the mainstem.

SCENARIO 2: Operate withdrawals that will be at a level sufficient to promote spawning and

recruitment by humpback chub at river mile 30 and other downstream aggregations.

SCENARIO 3: Operate withdrawals that will be at a level sufficient to promote spawning and

recruitment by humpback chub at middle granite gorge aggregation and further downstream.

SCENARIO 4: Operate withdrawals that will be at a level sufficient to reduce thermal shock to young

fish descending from tributaries, particularly the Little Colorado River, and into the mainstem.

What these scenarios might look like:
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, the undersigned Jack (J.D.) Draper, President and Chief Executive Officer of FIRSTPLUS Financial Group, Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: 

 

1.             The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

| Dated: July 11, 2006 | /s/ Jack (J.D.) Draper |
|----------------------|------------------------|

Jack (J.D.) Draper

President and Chief Executive Officer

Principal Accounting Officer
Alan Stuart Graf, OSB # 92317 

alanstuartgraf@gmail.com 

208 Pine St. 

Floyd, VA 24091 

Telephone: 931-231-4119 

Fax: 931-964-3127 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

DARL N. ROGERS 

Plaintiff, 

Commissioner of Social Security, 

Defendant. 

ORDER GRANTING 

ATTORNEYS' FEES 

UNDER42 U.S.C. § 406(b) 

v. 

6: l 5-CV-0223 6-BR 

Attorneys' fees in the amount of $19,299.25 minus the EAJA fees of $5,985.68 previously 

paid for a total of $13,313.57 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) are hereby awarded to Plaintiffs 

attorney, Alan Graf. The court finds that this is a reasonable fee in light of the circumstances in 

this case. When issuing the 406(b) check for payment to Plaintiffs attorney, the Commissioner is 

directed to subtract any applicable processing fees as allowed by statute. 

DATED thisl ~day of O\u ,~ , 2018 

Anna J. Brown 

United States Senior District Judge 

ORDER GRANTING ATTORNEYS' FEES
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of American Metal & Technology, Inc.,
(the "Company") on Form 10-KA for the year ending December 31, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Chen Gao, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.
 
  Date:  April
      15, 2009
                By:
                /s/Chen
      GaoName:
      Chen GaoTitle:
      Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2069 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2069

   To permit the leasing of mineral rights, in any case in which the 
Indian owners of an allotment that is located within the boundaries of 
 the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation and held in trust by the United 
  States have executed leases to more than 50 percent of the mineral 
                       estate of that allotment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 12, 1998

Mr. Dorgan (for himself and Mr. Conrad) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To permit the leasing of mineral rights, in any case in which the 
Indian owners of an allotment that is located within the boundaries of 
 the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation and held in trust by the United 
  States have executed leases to more than 50 percent of the mineral 
                       estate of that allotment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LEASES OF ALLOTTED LANDS OF THE FORT BERTHOLD INDIAN 
              RESERVATION.

    (a) In General.--
            (1) Approval by secretary of the interior.--
                    (A) In general.--Notwithstanding any other 
                provision of law (including the Act of March 3, 1909 
                (35 Stat. 783, chapter 263; 25 U.S.C. 396) and the 
                regulations issued under that Act), the Secretary of 
                the Interior or a designee of the Secretary may approve 
                mineral leases of an allotment described in paragraph 
                (2) in any case in which the Indian owners of that 
                allotment have executed leases to more than 50 percent 
                of the mineral estate of that allotment.
                    (B) Benefits of leases.--At such time as mineral 
                leases on an allotment have been approved for all 
                Indian ownership interests pursuant to this section, 
                all Indian owners of the allotment shall be entitled to 
                the benefits of the leases.
            (2) Allotment.--An allotment described in this paragraph is 
        an allotment that--
                    (A) is located in the Fort Berthold Indian 
                Reservation, North Dakota; and
                    (B) is held in trust by the United States.
    (b) Rule of Construction.--This Act supersedes the Act of March 3, 
1909 (35 Stat. 783, chapter 263; 25 U.S.C. 396) only to the extent 
provided in subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
#### DAVIS, Appellant, v. ABRAHAM, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

December 2, 1896.)

Action by Sarah Davis against Anna P. V. R. Abraham.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

302 KA 09-02537
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND GORSKI, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CAMERON K. STRASSER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

ERICKSON WEBB SCOLTON & HAJDU, LAKEWOOD (LYLE T. HAJDU OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

DAVID W. FOLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, MAYVILLE (LAURIE M. BECKERINK OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Chautauqua County Court (John T. Ward, J.), rendered June 25, 2007. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the third degree (five counts).

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of five counts of burglary in the third degree (Penal Law § 140.20). We reject defendant’s contention that County Court erred in failing to conduct an evidentiary hearing before denying his motion to withdraw his plea. The court afforded defendant the requisite “reasonable opportunity to present his contentions” in support of that motion ( People v Tinsley , 35 NY2d 926, 927; see People v Irvine , 42 AD3d 949, lv denied 9 NY3d 962), and the court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that no further inquiry was necessary. Defendant’s contention that the plea was coerced by defense counsel is belied by his statements during the plea colloquy that no one forced him to plead guilty and that he was satisfied with the representation of defense counsel ( see Irvine , 42 AD3d 949; People v Nichols , 21 AD3d 1273, 1274, lv denied 6 NY3d 757). We reject defendant’s further contention that the court erred in refusing to assign new counsel for the motion to withdraw his plea, inasmuch as the record does not demonstrate that defense counsel took a position adverse to defendant ( see People v McKoy , 60 AD3d 1374, 1374-1375, lv denied 12 NY3d 856), or that he coerced defendant into pleading guilty ( cf. People v Ulloa , 300 AD2d 60, 61-62).

Entered: April 1, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 165 (Monday, August 30, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 48389]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-18576]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Notice of Public Meeting of the North Dakota Advisory Committee; 
Cancellation

AGENCY: Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice; cancellation of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission on Civil Rights published a notice in the 
Federal Register concerning a meeting of the North Dakota Advisory 
Committee. The meeting scheduled for Thursday, September 2, 2021, at 
10:00 a.m. (CT) is cancelled. The notice is in the Federal Register of 
Monday, August 16, 2021, in FR Doc. 2021-17423, in the second and third 
columns of page 45702.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Evelyn Bohor, (202) 921-2212, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#264344494e495466535545455408414950"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d7b2b5b8bfb8a597a2a4b4b4a5f9b0b8a1">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: August 24, 2021.
David Mussatt,
Supervisory Chief, Regional Programs Unit.
[FR Doc. 2021-18576 Filed 8-27-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Sugarcane Field Station: Canal Point, FL
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Canal Point, Florida Sugarcane Field Station Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Collaborations The Sugarcane Field Station has a long and productive history of collaborative research involving stakeholders.  Current collaborators and projects:  Maintaining Parental Plants and Optimizing Crosses for the Sugarcane Breeding and Cultivar Development Program in Louisiana  Diversification of Crosses for Improving the Canal Point Sugarcane Cultivar Development Program  Development of High Yield and Disease Resistant CP Sugarcane Cultivars for Florida  Utilization of Cutting Edge Real Time Sensor Technology in Sugarcane Breeding


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
PAGE 1 – ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

CAROLE J. BLANCHER,

Plaintiff,

v.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

Case No. 6:14-cv-1860-JE

ORDER

Michael H. Simon, District Judge.

United States Magistrate Judge John Jelderks issued Findings and Recommendation in 

this case on September 1, 2016. ECF 15. Judge Jelderks recommended that a judgment should be 

entered reversing the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision and remanding this action to 

the Social Security Administration for an award of benefits. No party has filed objections.

Under the Federal Magistrates Act (“Act”), the court may “accept, reject, or modify, in 

whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(1). If a party files objections to a magistrate’s findings and recommendations, “the court 

shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings 

or recommendations to which objection is made.” Id.; Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3).

Case 6:14-cv-01860-JE Document 17 Filed 09/22/16 Page 1 of 2
PAGE 2 – ORDER

If no party objects, the Act does not prescribe any standard of review. See Thomas v. Arn, 

474 U.S. 140, 152 (1985) (“There is no indication that Congress, in enacting [the Act], intended 

to require a district judge to review a magistrate’s report to which no objections are filed.”); 

United States. v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (holding that the 

court must review de novo magistrate’s findings and recommendations if objection is made, “but 

not otherwise”). 

Although review is not required in the absence of objections, the Act “does not preclude 

further review by the district judge[] sua sponte . . . under a de novo or any other standard.” 

Thomas, 474 U.S. at 154. Indeed, the Advisory Committee Notes to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) 

recommend that “[w]hen no timely objection is filed,” the court review the magistrate’s findings 

and recommendations for “clear error on the face of the record.”

No party having made objections, this Court follows the recommendation of the Advisory 

Committee and reviews Judge Jelderk’s Findings and Recommendation for clear error on the 

face of the record. No such error is apparent. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS Judge Jelderk’s 

Findings and Recommendation, ECF 15, REVERSES the Commissioner of Social Security’s 

decision, and REMANDS this action to the Social Security Administration for an award of 

benefits.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 22nd day of September, 2016.

/s/ Michael H. Simon

Michael H. Simon

United States District Judge

Case 6:14-cv-01860-JE Document 17 Filed 09/22/16 Page 2 of 2
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2183

To amend the Head Start Act to increase the reservation of funds for

programs for low-income families with very young children, and for

other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 17, 1998

Mr. HARKIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

A BILL

To amend the Head Start Act to increase the reservation

of funds for programs for low-income families with very

young children, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RESERVATIONS.

4 Section 640(a)(6) of the Head Start Act (42 U.S.C.

5 9835(a)(6)) is amended by striking ‘‘3 percent’’ and all

6 that follows through ‘‘1998’’ and inserting ‘‘7.5 percent

7 for fiscal year 1999, 8 percent for fiscal year 2000, 9 per8 cent for fiscal year 2001, and 10 percent for fiscal year

9 2002’’.
2

• S 2183 IS

1 SEC. 2. CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.

2 (a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section

3 639 of the Head Start Act (42 U.S.C. 9834) is amended—

4 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘1995 through

5 1998’’ and inserting ‘‘1999 through 2002’’; and

6 (2) in subsection (b)—

7 (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘1995

8 through 1998’’ and inserting ‘‘1999 through

9 2002’’; and

10 (B) in paragraph (2)—

11 (i) by striking ‘‘1995’’ and inserting

12 ‘‘1999’’; and

13 (ii) by striking ‘‘1996 through 1998’’

14 and inserting ‘‘2000 through 2002’’.

15 (b) PROGRAMS.—Paragraphs (2) and (3)(B) of sec16 tion 645A(e) of the Head Start Act (42 U.S.C. 9840a(e))

17 is amended by striking ‘‘each of fiscal years 1995, 1996,

18 and 1997’’ and inserting ‘‘a fiscal year’’.

Æ