alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Law Office of 

Michael S. Truesdale, PLLC 

Michael S. Truesdale mike@truesdalelaw.com

Board Certified • Civil Appellate Law

Texas Board of Legal Specialization

801 West Avenue, Suite 201 Austin, Texas 78701

512.482.8671 (ofc) • 866.847.8719 (fax) • www.truesdalelaw.com

September 29, 2016

Honorable Jeffrey Kyle, Clerk

Third Court of Appeals

P.O. Box 12547

Austin, TX 78711

Re: 03-15-00447-CV, Austin Capital Collision v. Barbara Pampalone, Confirmation 

of intention to present oral argument

Dear Mr. Kyle:

In response to this Court’s September 15, 2016 correspondence, this letter confirms my 

intention to present oral argument in this case on October 26, 2016 on behalf of Appellant 

Austin Capital Collision and Cross-Appellee Eric Hinojosa.

I request that my time for argument be divided as follows: 13 minutes for argument on 

behalf of Appellant, and 7 minutes for reply/response to Cross-Appellee’s argument.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Michael S. Truesdale

Michael S. Truesdale

SBN 00791825

Counsel for Appellant Austin Capital Collision and 

Cross-Appellee Eric Hinojosa

cc: Nelia Robbi (via e-service)

ACCEPTED

03-15-00447-CV

12971611

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

9/29/2016 11:38:32 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 9/29/2016 11:38:32 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 10.6


         The following Executive Officers are parties to an Employment Agreement
in the form of Exhibit 10.5, which Employment Agreements differ with respect to
the terms indicated:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
             EXECUTIVE OFFICER                                  POSITION                             SALARY
             -----------------                                  --------                             ------
<S>                                           <C>                                                   <C>

Frank H. Jellinek, Jr.                        President and Chief Executive Officer                 $750,000
Jeffrey C. Leathe                             Chief Financial Officer                               $315,000
Michael K. Bresson                            General Counsel                                       $310,000
Yuh-Geng Tsay                                 Group President, Immunoassay Diagnostics              $310,000
Verner Andersen                               Group President, Labware and Life Sciences            $305,000

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 166 (Tuesday, August 31, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 48793]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-18749]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #17118; California Disaster Number CA-00343 
Declaration of Economic Injury]


Administrative Declaration of an Economic Injury Disaster for the 
State of California

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) 
declaration for the State of California dated 08/26/2021. Incident: 
Tamarack Fire. Incident Period: 07/04/2021 and continuing.

DATES: Issued on 08/26/2021. Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application 
Deadline Date: 05/26/2022.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's EIDL declaration, applications for economic injury 
disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other 
locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Alpine.
Contiguous Counties:
    California: Amador, Calaveras, El Dorado, Mono, Tuolumne.
    Nevada: Douglas.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Businesses and Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit      2.880
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere..      2.000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for economic injury is 171180.
    The States which received an EIDL Declaration #17118 are 
California, Nevada.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Isabella Guzman,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2021-18749 Filed 8-30-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DANTE LAMON TAPLIN, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

MULTNOMAH COUNTY HEALTH 

SERVICES, et al., 

Defendants. 

AIKEN, District Judge. 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

3:15-cv-1937-AA 

ORDER 

Plaintiff's Motion for reconsideration I clarification (#27) 

is allowed to the following extent. The court hereby affirms that 

the order of voluntary dismissal (#26) applied to the federal 

defendants only. 

Plaintiff's motion "Request to take Judicial Notice" (#15) is 

denied. 

1 - ORDER 

Case 3:15-cv-01937-AA Document 30 Filed 05/04/16 Page 1 of 2
Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (#17) is denied. 

Defendant Brown's Motion for extension of time (#29) is 

allowed. 

IT IS 

DATED 

so ORDIMJ\ 

this ¥'day 

2 - ORDER 

of May, 2016. 

al.AA (]J!,wJ Ann Aiken 

United States District Judge 

Case 3:15-cv-01937-AA Document 30 Filed 05/04/16 Page 2 of 2
Supreme Court of the United States

Office of the Clerk

Washington, DC 20543-0001

March 20, 2023

Clerk

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth 

Circuit

95 Seventh Street

San Francisco, CA 94103-1526

Re: Michael T. Brooks

v. Agate Resources, Inc., et al.

No. 22M82

(Your No. 21-36016)

Dear Clerk:

The Court today entered the following order in the above-entitled case:

The motion of respondents for leave to file a petition for a writ of 

certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record is granted.

Sincerely,

Scott S. Harris, Clerk

Scott S. Harris

Clerk of the Court

(202) 479-3011

Case 6:14-cv-01424-MC Document 129 Filed 03/20/23 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

KIRK MORRIS, 

 Plaintiff, 

3:15-CV-01919-SI

vs. 

ORDER

CAROLYN COLVIN, 

Commissioner of Social Security, 

 Defendant. 

Based upon the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that attorney fees in the 

amount of $1,750.00 and costs for filing fees in the amount of $400 shall be awarded to Plaintiff 

pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. The parties agree that attorney 

fees will be paid to Plaintiff’s attorney, dependent upon verification that Plaintiff has no debt 

which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees and costs, pursuant to the Treasury Offset 

Program as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). 

If Plaintiff has no such debt, then the check shall be made out to Plaintiff’s attorney and 

mailed to Plaintiff’s attorney’s office as follows: Merrill Schneider, P.O. Box 14490, Portland, 

OR 97293. If Plaintiff has a debt, then the check for any remaining funds after offset of the debt 

shall be made to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff's attorney's office at the address stated above. 

DATED this _____ day of ___________________, 2016. 

_______________________________ 

Michael Simon 

United States District Court Judge 

17th November

/s/ Michael H. Simon

Case 3:15-cv-01919-SI Document 26 Filed 11/17/16 Page 1 of 1
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2027

To clarify the fair tax treatment of meals provided hotel and restaurant

employees in nondiscriminatory employee cafeterias.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 1, 1998

Mr. BRYAN (for himself and Mr. REID) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To clarify the fair tax treatment of meals provided hotel

and restaurant employees in nondiscriminatory employee

cafeterias.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 119 of the Internal Revenue Code of

4 1986 is amended by adding the following new subsection:

5 ‘‘(e) In the case of an employee of a hotel or res6 taurant, gross income shall not include the value of meals

7 furnished to such employee by an employer in a non8 discriminatory employee cafeteria located on the business
2

S 2027 IS

1 premises of the employer immediately before, immediately

2 after, or during work shifts.’’.

Æ
#### FERRIS, Appellant, v. HAYNES, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July 31, 1896.)

Action by Joseph A. Ferris against Tilly Haynes.

Edmund

L. Mooney, for appellant.

Aaron C. Thayer, for respondent.

*1142PER CURIAM.

The order denying the motion for a discovery of books and papers was right. The general term of the court of common pleas expressly held that the plaintiff could not recover a percentage as brokerage on any fixed sum for the reason that no fixed sum was mentioned in the lease as rental.' Whether that decision was correct or not is not the question, and it cannot be reviewed on an appeal from this order. It is the law of the case as laid down by the general term of the court in which the action was brought. Under the decision as made by the general term it would be useless to undertake to give evidence of net profits payable as rent, because the court held that there was nothing payable as rent, and that the principle controlling the case was such that no recovery could be based upon a specific sum, no matter how that specific sum might be ascertained, it not being mentioned in the lease; or, in other words, there was nothing payable as rent from the lessee to the lessor until at the end of the accounting, and that, therefore, the plaintiff had mistaken his remedy, and should have sued on a quantum meruit. The court below was right, therefore, in holding that the motion must be denied upon the opinion of the general term of the court of common pleas. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 165 (Monday, August 30, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48460-48461]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-18756]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE:  2 p.m. on Thursday, September 2, 2021.

PLACE:  The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the 
Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

[[Page 48461]]


STATUS:  This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:  Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, 
the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend 
the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the 
matters also may be present.
    In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting 
changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, 
and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website 
at https://www.sec.gov.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), 
permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.
    The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the 
following topics:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
    Resolution of litigation claims; and
    Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of 
adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  For further information; please 
contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 
551-5400.

    Dated: August 26, 2021.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-18756 Filed 8-26-21; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 164 (Friday, August 27, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 48125]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-18483]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XB354]


Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC); Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (Council) will 
convene a public peer review meeting consisting of members of the 
Council's Scientific and Statistical Committee (SSC).

DATES: The meeting will be held on Monday, September 20, 2021, starting 
at 10 a.m. and continue through 4 p.m. See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION 
for agenda details.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will take place over webinar using the Webex 
platform with a telephone-only connection option. Details on how to 
connect to the webinar by computer and by telephone will be available 
at: http://www.mafmc.org.
    Council address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N. 
State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 674-2331; 
website: www.mafmc.org.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D., Executive 
Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, telephone: (302) 
526-5255.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Council will convene a peer review panel 
consisting of members of the Council's SSC to review potential two 
recreational management models. These two models, a recreational fleet 
dynamics model and an economic recreational demand model, are being 
considered for use by the Council's Fishery Management Action Team 
(FMAT) and the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission's (ASMFC) 
Plan Development Team (PDT) that are developing analyses, materials, 
and alternatives for the Council and ASMFC Recreational Reform 
Initiative. The potential use of these models would be part of the 
development of a Harvest Control Rule currently being considered as one 
component of the Recreational Reform action. The peer review will help 
identify potential benefits, uncertainties, and appropriate approaches 
and considerations of each model for use by the FMAT/PDT.
    A detailed agenda and background documents will be made available 
on the Council's website (www.mafmc.org) prior to the meeting.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aid should 
be directed to Shelley Spedden, (302) 526-5251, at least 5 days prior 
to the meeting date.
    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: August 24, 2021.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-18483 Filed 8-26-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Houston, Texas
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Houston, Texas People & Locations







Jayna  Dave

                                                                (PhD)
                        Houston, Texas

                        




                        
                        Nutrition Scientist
                        Phone: (713) 798-7195
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### MARGARET C. RAINAUD, *ET AL.,*PLAINTIFFS-PETITIONERS, v. DOMINICK J. MULLANEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

*Messrs. Parsons, Gamona, Blair & Smith*and *Mr. John G. Givens*for the petitioners.

*Messrs. McKeown, Harth & Enright*for the respondent.

February 14, 1961.

Denied.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Hybred International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K /A for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gary Kouletas, President of the Company, respectfully certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





The Report fully complies with the requirements of the section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.














/s/ Gary Kouletas


Gary Kouletas


President (Principal Executive Officer)








Date: September 2 8 , 2011





This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Hybred International, Inc. and will be retained by Hybred International, Inc.. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

STEPHEN P. ARNOT, Chapter 7 

Trustee, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

JOSHUA R. CHENEY; RECON 

TRUST COMPNA Y, N.A.; and THE 

BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, 

Defendants. 

MOSMAN,J., 

PORTLAND DIVISION 

No. 3:15-cv-01503-SB 

OPINION AND ORDER 

On December 24, 2015, Magistrate Judge Beckerman issued her Findings and 

Recommendation (F&R) [20], recommending that Plaintiffs Motion for Order Remanding Case 

to State Court and For Judicial Notice of Procedural Facts [7] should be GRANTED and this 

case should be REMANDED to the Multnomah County Circuit Court. No objections to the 

Findings and Recommendation were filed. 

DISCUSSION 

The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the coutt, to which any party may 

file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge, 

but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The comt is generally required to 

make a de novo determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or 

recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b )(1 )(C). However, the court 

1 - OPINION AND ORDER 

Case 3:15-cv-01503-SB Document 22 Filed 01/26/16 Page 1 of 2
is not required to review, de novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of 

the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See 

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 

(9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F&R 

depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject, 

or modify any part of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(C). 

Upon review, I agree with Judge Beckerman's recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R 

[20] as my own opinion. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this~ day of January, 2016. 

United 

~ States District Judge 

2 - OPINION AND ORDER 

Case 3:15-cv-01503-SB Document 22 Filed 01/26/16 Page 2 of 2