alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Rangeland Resources & Systems Research: Fort Collins, CO
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Areas of Research
                        CARM
                                    PHACE
                                    Thunder Basin
                                    Modeling
                                    WindSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Fort Collins, Colorado Center for Agricultural Resources Research Rangeland Resources & Systems Research Research





- IACUC CPER Summary
- IACUC HPGRS Summary
- IACUC CPER Summary
- IACUC HPGRS Summary
- List of Projects in this Program
- List of Project Annual Reports in this program

IACUC CPER Summaryheadline bar IACUC Executive Summary  October 2023 April 2024


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
**M L** **P** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 1 - 0 5 71 STATE OF MONTANA ,

Plaintiff and Appellee , v. JEFFREY ALLEN WESTFALL ,

Defendant and Appellant .

**GRANT OF EXTENSION** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is gran ted a n extension of time to and including August 1 8 , 20 2 3 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court July 17 2023

07/17/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0571
#### Harvinder SINGH, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-72845.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 16, 2007.*

Filed April 18, 2007.

Pardeep Singh Grewal, Oakland, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Audrey B. Hemesath, Esq., San Francisco, CA, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Sacramento, CA, Richard M. Evans, Esq., Paul Fiorino, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CLIFTON and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Harvinder Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision, *716which adopted and affirmed the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252.

We review the IJ’s decision for substantial evidence, *Abebe v. Gonzales,*432 F.3d 1037, 1039-40 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s adverse credibility determination because the IJ relied on inconsistencies between Singh’s testimony and documentary evidence that go to the heart of his asylum claim, including inconsistencies regarding whether Singh received medical treatment after the two arrests. *See Chebchoub v. INS,*257 F.3d 1038, 1043 (9th Cir.2001).

Because Singh did not establish that he was eligible for asylum, it follows that he did not satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. *See Alvarez-Santos v. INS,*332 F.3d 1245, 1255 (9th Cir.2003).

Substantial evidence also supports the denial of CAT relief because Singh did not establish that it is more likely than not that he will be tortured if he returns to India. *See Malhi v. INS,*336 F.3d 989, 993 (9th Cir.2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Pest Management Research: Sidney, MT
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    NPARL
                        Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory
                                    Agricultural Systems Research Unit
                                    Grasshoppers: Their Biology, Identification and ManagementSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Sidney, Montana Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory Pest Management Research PMRU Docs Grasshoppers: Their Biology, Identification and Management: Outbreak and Survey Info Forecast Maps





- NPARL Home
- PMRU Home
- ASRU Home
- Site Highlights
- Outbreak and Survey Info
- ID Tools | Apps
- Grasshopper Management
- IPM Handbook
- USDA Research | Contact Info

Outbreak Info: Grasshopper Forecast 2022headline bar /ARSUserFiles/30320505/2022_GH_Hazard.jpg < Previous MapBack to Outbreak Info >Next Map >


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<PAGE>   1

                                                              EXHIBIT 21.01

                  SUBSIDIARIES* OF CARAUSTAR INDUSTRIES, INC.

                                           STATE OF
            NAME                        INCORPORATION   TRADE, D/B/A/ NAMES
            ----                        -------------   -------------------
                                                        
ACC Services, Inc.                      North Carolina  
Mid Packaging Group - Alabama, Inc.     Alabama
Atlantic Coast Carton Company           North Carolina
Austell Box Board Corporation           Georgia
Buffalo Paperboard Corporation          New York
Camden Paperboard Corporation           New Jersey
Caraustar Paper Sales, Inc.             Georgia         Caraustar Paper Sales-
                                                           South
Caraustar Paperboard Corporation        Ohio            * *
Carolina Paper Board Corporation        North Carolina
Carolina Paper Box Co., Inc.            North Carolina
Carolina Recycling, Inc.                North Carolina
Carotell Paper Board Corporation        South Carolina
Chattanooga Paperboard Corporation      Tennessee
Chicago Paperboard Corporation          Illinois
Cincinnati Paperboard Corporation       Ohio
Columbus Recycling, Inc.                Georgia
Federal Packaging Corporation           Delaware
Federal Transport, Inc.                 Ohio
GAR Holding Company                     Delaware
Macon Recycling, Inc.                   Georgia
Mid-State Paper Box Company, Inc.       North Carolina
Packrite Packaging, Inc.                North Carolina
Paper Recycling, Inc.                   Georgia
Paragon Plastics, Inc. (80% owned)      South Carolina
Quality Design Products, Inc.           Georgia
Reading Paperboard Corporation          Pennsylvania
Richmond Paperboard Corporation         Virginia
Special Packaging, Inc.                 Delaware
Standard Gypsum Corporation             Texas
Star Paper Tube de Mexico, S.A.
    de C.V. (65% owned)                 Mexico
Star Paper Tube, Inc.                   South Carolina
Star Recycling Incorporated             Georgia
Sweetwater Paper Board Company, Inc.    Georgia
The Garber Company                      Delaware
The Mid/Packaging Group, Inc.           Tennessee


------------

 *  Each subsidiary is wholly-owned by Caraustar Industries, Inc. unless
otherwise indicated.

**  Holds 80% interest in partnership joint venture which does business in
Ohio as Rittman Paperboard, Caraustar Paper Sales-North, and Cleveland
Paper Stock and in Iowa as Tama Paperboard.
# C_2006167EN.01001701.xml

| 19.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 167/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 167/17

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2006/C 167/05)

| 1. | As provided for in Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 (1) on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community, the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below. |
| --- | --- |

1.

As provided for in Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 (1) on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community, the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Community producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury.

Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Community producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Community producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Division B-1), J-79 5/16, B-1049 Brussels (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

| 4. | This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995.









  Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Ammonium nitrate | Russia | Anti-dumping duty | Council Regulation (EC) No 658/2002 (OJ L 102, 18.4.2002, p. 1) as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 945/2005 (OJ L 160, 23.6.2005, p. 1)) | 19.4.2007 |

4.

This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995.

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry

Ammonium nitrate

Russia

Anti-dumping duty

Council Regulation (EC) No 658/2002 (OJ L 102, 18.4.2002, p. 1) as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 945/2005 (OJ L 160, 23.6.2005, p. 1))

19.4.2007

---

(1)  OJ L 56, 6.3.1996, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 2117/2005 (OJ L 340, 23.12.2005, p. 17).

1

(2)  Telefax: (32-2) 295 65 05.

2

---
1 – JUDGMENT 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

ADIDAS AMERICA, INC., an Oregon No. 3:15-cv-01741-HZ

corporation; ADIDAS AG, a foreign entity;

and ADIDAS INTERNATIONAL JUDGMENT

MARKETING B.V, a foreign entity,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SKECHERS USA, INC., a Delaware

corporation,

Defendant.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:

Based on the parties’ stipulation, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is 

dismissed with prejudice.

DATED this ___________ day of _________________________, 2018.

 

 

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-01741-HZ Document 306 Filed 05/30/18 Page 1 of 1
#### MAGGIO, Respondent, v. LAKE SHORE & M. S. RY. CO., Appellant.

(Superior Court of Buffalo,

General Term.

December 23, 1895.)

Action by Rosanio Maggio, as administratrix, etc., against the Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Company.

No opinion. Judgment and order appealed from affirmed, with costs.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1670 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1670

                     One Hundred Fourteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
           the fourth day of January, two thousand and sixteen

                                 An Act

 
  To direct the Architect of the Capitol to place in the United States 
  Capitol a chair honoring American Prisoners of War/Missing in Action.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``National POW/MIA Remembrance Act of 
2015''.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
    Congress finds the following:
        (1) In recent years, commemorative chairs honoring American 
    Prisoners of War/Missing in Action have been placed in prominent 
    locations across the United States.
        (2) The United States Capitol is an appropriate location to 
    place a commemorative chair honoring American Prisoners of War/
    Missing in Action.
SEC. 3. PLACEMENT OF A CHAIR IN UNITED STATES CAPITOL HONORING AMERICAN 
PRISONERS OF WAR/MISSING IN ACTION.
    (a) Obtaining Chair.--The Architect of the Capitol shall enter into 
an agreement to obtain a chair featuring the logo of the National 
League of POW/MIA Families under such terms and conditions as the 
Architect considers appropriate and consistent with applicable law.
    (b) Placement.--Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Architect shall place the chair obtained under 
subsection (a) in a suitable permanent location in the United States 
Capitol.
SEC. 4. FUNDING.
    (a) Donations.--The Architect of the Capitol may--
        (1) enter into an agreement with any organization described in 
    section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 that is 
    exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of that Code to solicit 
    private donations to carry out the purposes of this Act; and
        (2) accept donations of funds, property, and services to carry 
    out the purposes of this Act.
    (b) Costs.--All costs incurred in carrying out the purposes of this 
Act shall be paid for with private donations received under subsection 
(a).

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Rangeland Resources & Systems Research: Fort Collins, CO
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Areas of Research
                        CARM
                                    PHACE
                                    Thunder Basin
                                    Modeling
                                    WindSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Fort Collins, Colorado Center for Agricultural Resources Research Rangeland Resources & Systems Research Research





- IACUC CPER Summary
- IACUC HPGRS Summary
- IACUC CPER Summary
- IACUC HPGRS Summary
- List of Projects in this Program
- List of Project Annual Reports in this program

IACUC HPGRS Summaryheadline bar IACUC Executive Summary  October 2023 April 2024


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### Seymour Ginsberg et al., Appellants, v Industrial Home for the Blind et al., Respondents.

The undisputed facts presented to the court on the defendants’ motion for summary judgment establish, as a matter of law, that the transportation-related injury to the plaintiff Seymour Ginsberg arose out of, and in the course of his employment with the defendant Industrial Home for the Blind *(see, Matter of Holcomb v Daily News,*45 NY2d 602). Accordingly, Special Term was correct in granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiffs’ exclusive remedy lies under the Workers’ Compensation Law *(see,*Workers’ Compensation Law § 11). Mangano, J. P., Weinstein, Lawrence and Fiber, JJ., concur.
----

|                    |                                      |   |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:      July 7, 2009 | /s/ Norval L. Bruce                       |   |
|                    | Norval      L. Bruce                      |   |
|                    | Member      of the Executive Committee of |   |
|                    | the      Board of Directors               |   |

| Date:      July 7, 2009 | /s/ Hirotaka Oribe                        |   |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------------|--------|
|                    | Hirotaka      Oribe                       |   |
|                    | Member      of the Executive Committee of |   |
|                    | the      Board of Directors               |   |

| Date:      July 7, 2009 | /s/ Robert R. Reed                        |   |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------------|--------|
|                    | Robert      R. Reed                       |   |
|                    | Member      of the Executive Committee of |   |
|                    | the      Board of Directors               |   |

| Date:      July 7, 2009 | /s/ Timothy M. Doyle                 |   |
|-------------------------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|                    | Timothy      M. Doyle                |   |
|                    | Executive      Managing Director and |   |
|                    | Chief      Financial Officer         |   |

----