IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

PORTLAND DIVISION 

SURVIVOR PRODUCTIONS, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

JONATHAN OWENS, 

Defendant. 

AIKEN, Judge: 

Case No. 3:15-cv-01596-AA 

ORDER 

Plaintiff Survivor Productions, Inc., filed this copyright infringement action against a Doe 

defendant associated with a particular Internet protocol ("IP") address, alleging that address was used 

to distribute plaintiffs copyrighted motion picture, Survivor, through peer-to-peer file sharing. 

Compl. ifif 16-17. Plaintiff learned through discovery that defendant Jonathan Owens was the 

subscriber assigned that IP address and subpoenaed defendant to appear at a deposition pursuant to 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45. Taylor Deel. if 6, May 17, 2016 (doc. 26). According to a sworn 

PAGE 1 - ORDER 

Case 3:15-cv-01596-AA Document 35 Filed 07/06/16 Page 1 of 5
declaration submitted by plaintiffs counsel, defendant appeared at the deposition and "invoked the 

Fifth Amendment in response to all substantive questions regarding the use and access to his Internet 

service and his lmowledge and use of BitTorrent." Id. ~ 7. Plaintiff then amended the Complaint 

to name defendant and served him with a copy of the summons and First Amended Complaint. Doc. 

16. Defendant never filed an answer or otherwise appeared in this lawsuit. This Court entered 

default judgment in plaintiffs favor on June 1, 2016. Doc. 29. The default judgment order 

permanently enjoined defendant from infringing plaintiffs rights in Survivor and awarded plaintiff 

$1,250 in statutory damages. Doc. 28. Plaintiff now moves for attorney's fees and costs. 

The court has discretion to allow the prevailing party in a copyright infringement action to 

recover costs and reasonable attorney's fees. 17 U.S.C. § 505; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d). In considering 

whether to exercise that discretion, the court may consider, among other factors, (1) the degree of 

success obtained; (2) frivolousness; (3) motivation; ( 4) the objective unreasonableness of the losing 

party's factual and legal arguments; and (5) the need, in particular circumstances, to advance 

considerations of compensation and deterrence. Perfect 10, Inc. v. CCBill LLC, 488 F Jd 1102, 1120 

(9th Cir. 2007). These factors justify an award of fees in this case. 

In determining what amount of attorney's fees is reasonable, courts first "calculate the 

'lodestar figure' by taking the number of hours reasonably expended on the litigation and multiplying 

it by a reasonable hourly rate." Fischer v. SJB-P.D. Inc., 214 F.3d 1115, 1119 (9th Cir. 2000) 

(quoting Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 433 (1983)). The court then must decide whether to 

enhance or reduce the lodestar figure on the basis of one or more of the "Kerr factors. " 1 Id. "[T]here 

1 The Kerr factors are: (1) the time and labor required; (2) the novelty and difficulty of 

the questions involved; (3) the skill required to perform the legal service properly; (4) the 

preclusion of other employment by the attorney due to the acceptance of the case; (5) the 

PAGE 2 - ORDER 

Case 3:15-cv-01596-AA Document 35 Filed 07/06/16 Page 2 of 5
is a 'strong presumption' that the lodestar figure is reasonable, but that presumption may be 

overcome in those rare circumstance in which the lodestar does not adequately take into account a 

factor that may properly be considered in determining a reasonable fee." Perdue v. Kenny A. ex rel. 

Winn, 559 U.S. 542, 554 (2010). 

Plaintiff seeks $1,212.75 in attorney's fees, representing 6.93 hours of work billed at an 

hourly rate of $17 5. As the party seeking fees, plaintiff bears the burden of showing that the number 

of hours billed and the hourly rate are reasonable. Cascadia Wildlands v. Bureau of Land Mgmt., 

987 F. Supp. 2d 1085, 1092 (D. Or. 2013). 

I find plaintiffs requested hourly rate for attorney Drew P. Taylor reasonable. Taylor was 

admitted to the Oregon State Bar in 2013 and his office is in Salem, which is located in the Upper 

Valley region of the state. In the District of Oregon, the most recent Oregon State Bar Economic 

Survey ("OSB Survey") is the "initial benchmark in determining whether hourly billing rates are 

reasonable." Barkv. Northrop, 300 F.R.D. 486, 493 (D. Or. 2014). According to the OSB Survey, 

the median hourly rate for attorneys in the Upper Valley with zero to three years' experience is $150 

per hour. OSB Survey 29.2 A rate $25 higher than the median is reasonable here because (1) 

customary fee; (6) whether the fee is fixed or contingent; (7) time limitations imposed by the 

client or circumstances; (8) the amount involved and the results obtained; (9) the experience, 

reputation, and ability of the attorneys; (10) the undesirability of the case; (11) the nature and 

length of the professional relationship with the client; and (12) awards in similar cases. Kerr v. 

Screen Extras Guild, Inc., 526 F.2d 67, 70 (9th Cir. 1975), abrogated on other grounds by City 

of Burlington v. Dague, 505 U.S. 557 (1992). The lodestar calculation subsumes many of these 

considerations, including the time and labor required; the special skill and experience of counsel; 

and the type of fee agreement. Morales v. City of San Rafael, 96 F.3d 359, 363-64 & n.9 (9th 

Cir. 1996). 

2 The 2012 OSB Survey is available online at 

https ://www.osbar.org/ _docs/resources/ econsurveys/12economicsurvey. pdf. 

PAGE 3 - ORDER 

Case 3:15-cv-01596-AA Document 35 Filed 07/06/16 Page 3 of 5
Taylor's nearly three years of practice experience place him at the high end of the zero-to-three year 

experience bracket; (2) there are no Upper Valley-specific billing rates available for 

business/corporate litigation, and data from other areas of the state suggests billing rates in this area 

of practice are somewhat higher than the overall median;3 and (3) the survey rates are four years old 

and should be increased a modest amount to account for inflation.4 

I also find the requested number of hours reasonable. The hours log submitted with the 

motion for fees appropriately apportions time spent on multiple similar cases to avoid duplicative 

and excessive billing. See Doc. 32-1. The Court notes that plaintiff has a number of nearly identical 

copyright infringement actions pending in the District of Oregon and encourages plaintiff to continue 

to seek efficiencies and account for time expended to advance multiple cases in future fee petitions. 

See Elf-Man, LLC v. C.G. Chinque Albright, 2014 WL 5543845, *10 (E.D. Wash. Oct. 31, 2014). 

Plaintiff has not asked for an upward adjustment based on any of the Kerr factors. After 

independently reviewing those factors, I find none of them justify either enhancement or reduction 

of the fee award. See Sapperv. Lenco Blade, Inc., 704F.2d1069, 1073 (9th Cir. 1983)(in awarding 

attorney's fees, a district court need only address "the factors called into question by the case at hand 

3 The median overall billing rate in Portland is $275, and the median business/corporate 

litigation billing rate in Portland is $300. OSB Survey at 29, 31. The median overall billing rate 

in the Tri-County (Clackamas, Multnomah, and Washington Counties, excluding Portland) 

region is $210, and the median business/corporate litigation billing rate in the Tri-County region 

is $248. Id. 

4 See Silvia v. Multnomah Cnty., 2009 WL 1162085, *2 (D. Or. Apr. 29, 2009). The U.S. 

Bureau of Labor Statistics' historical consumer price index for all U.S. cities lists the annual 

average rates of inflation for the last four years as 2.1 % (2012), 1.5% (2013), 1.6% (2014), and 

0.1 % (2015). Consumer Price Index Detailed Report (Apr. 2016), Table 24, available at 

www.bls.gov/cpi/tables.htm. Applying these rates increases the median Upper Valley rate for 

new attorneys to $158 per hour. 

PAGE 4 - ORDER 

Case 3:15-cv-01596-AA Document 35 Filed 07/06/16 Page 4 of 5
and necessary to support the reasonableness of the fee award" (quotation marks omitted)). Plaintiff 

is entitled to an award of attorney fees in the requested amount of $1,212. 7 5. Plaintiff is also entitled 

to an award of costs in the requested amount of $764.90. 5 

CONCLUSION 

Plaintiffs Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs (doc. 31) is GRANTED and plaintiff is 

awarded attorney's fees and costs in the amount of $1,977.65. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated this~~ of July 2016. 

Ann Aiken 

United States District Judge 

5 Plaintiffs bill of costs breaks down as follows: a $400 fee for filing this lawsuit; a $55 

fee for service of the summons and subpoena; a $70 fee for obtaining IP identification services 

from Comcast; a $58.50 fee for service of the First Amended Complaint, Summons, and Case 

Assignment Order; $99 paid to defendant for his mileage and witness fee; and $84.50 for court 

report services and a transcript. See Doc. 30. 

PAGE 5 - ORDER 

Case 3:15-cv-01596-AA Document 35 Filed 07/06/16 Page 5 of 5