alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           3,429
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,633
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,469)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          96,890
<DEPRECIATION>                                (73,580)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,068
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         18,540
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,082
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,068
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,999
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,788
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (336)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,706
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,917
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,917
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,917
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.24
        

</TABLE>
# EUR-Lex - 52006AP0247 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52006AP0247

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council decision adapting Annex VIII to the Act of Accession of Bulgaria and Romania (COM(2006)0152 - C6-0134/2006 - 2006/0054(CNS)) **

*
Official Journal 300 E , 09/12/2006 P. 0088 - 0089 *

P6_TA(2006)0247

Adaptation of Annex VIII to the Act of Accession of Bulgaria and Romania *

European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council decision adapting Annex VIII to the Act of Accession of Bulgaria and Romania (COM(2006)0152 — C6-0134/2006 — 2006/0054(CNS))

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2006)0152) [1],

- having regard to Article 4(3) of the Treaty of Accession and Article 34(4) of the Act of Accession of Bulgaria and Romania, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0134/2006),

- having regard to Rules 51 and 43(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development (A6-0197/2006),

1. Approves the Commission proposal;

2. Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

3. Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to amend the Commission proposal substantially;

4. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

[1] Not yet published in the OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
#### Renee M. Anderson, Appellant, v Erin Clark et al., Respondents.

[941 NYS2d 660]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mayer, J.), dated March 3, 2011, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that she did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants met their burden of establishing, prima facie, that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject *682accident *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345 [2002]; *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955 [1992]). The defendants submitted evidence establishing that the alleged injuries to the cervical and lumbosacral regions of the plaintiff’s spine, and to the plaintiffs left knee, did not constitute serious injuries within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) *(see Staff v Yshua,*59 AD3d 614 [2009]; *Rodriguez v Huerfano,*46 AD3d 794, 795 [2007]). The defendants also submitted evidence establishing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury under the 90/ 180-day category of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) *(see McIntosh v O’Brien,*69 AD3d 585, 587 [2010]).

In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Skelos, J.E, Dickerson, Hall, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur. [Prior Case History: 2011 NY Slip Op 30625(U).]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6024

TERRY CHARLES WILLIAMS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

ARTHUR F. BEELER, Warden; UNITED STATES OF

AMERICA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District

Judge. (CA-00-925)

Submitted: May 31, 2001 Decided: June 8, 2001

Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terry Charles Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Terry Charles Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his action challenging his convictions and

sentence imposed in the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Georgia. Williams filed his claim for relief

under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994). Because he was challenging his

convictions and sentence, the district court construed his action

as a 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000) motion and denied relief

on the ground that the court lacked jurisdiction. Williams’ claim

for relief under § 2241 is unavailing because he does not meet the

test for proceeding under this statute as set forth in In re Jones,

226 F.3d 328, 333-34 (4th Cir. 2000). Accordingly, we affirm the

district court’s order denying relief. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Range Management Research: Las Cruces, NM
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Comprehensive Publications
                    Research SummarySearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Las Cruces, New Mexico Range Management Research Docs





- Landscape Toolbox
- Long Term Agricultural Research
- EcoTrends
- Long Term Ecological Research
- Ecological Site Descriptions
- Monitoring & Assessment
- Southwest Climate Hub
- Land Potential Knowledge System
- National Ecological Observatory Network
- JournalMap
- Assessment, Inventory, and Monitoring (AIM)
- Data Catalogs

Track Dune Marginheadline bar The impact of track disturbance is relatively high and recovery of soil functionality is slow at Dune margin-type sites. Soil compaction is very likely to be high following disturbance and vegetation recovery likely to be slow. There is a low risk of water erosion, but a high risk of wind erosion following treatment. Soil infiltration rates are very likely to decrease following disturbance and will be negatively affected by repeated disturbance within six years of the first disturbance. Applying track treatments to Dune margin-type sites should be done with caution and a minimum of six years should be left between disturbance events in order for sites to recover.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
PAGE 1 – ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

SEAN P. MITCHELL,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOHN MYRICK, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:15-cv-001189-SB

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION

Michael H. Simon, District Judge.

United States Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman issued Findings and 

Recommendation in this case on January 25, 2016. Dkt. 17. Judge Beckerman recommended that 

the Court dismiss this proceeding, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution. No party has filed 

objections.

Under the Federal Magistrates Act (“Act”), the court may “accept, reject, or modify, in 

whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(1). If a party files objections to a magistrate’s findings and recommendations, “the court 

shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings 

or recommendations to which objection is made.” Id.; Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3).

Case 2:15-cv-01189-SB Document 20 Filed 02/12/16 Page 1 of 2
PAGE 2 – ORDER

If no party objects, the Act does not prescribe any standard of review. See Thomas v. Arn, 

474 U.S. 140, 152 (1985) (“There is no indication that Congress, in enacting [the Act], intended 

to require a district judge to review a magistrate’s report to which no objections are filed.”); 

United States. v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (holding that the 

court must review de novo magistrate’s findings and recommendations if objection is made, “but 

not otherwise”). 

Although review is not required in the absence of objections, the Act “does not preclude 

further review by the district judge[] sua sponte . . . under a de novo or any other standard.” 

Thomas, 474 U.S. at 154. Indeed, the Advisory Committee Notes to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) 

recommend that “[w]hen no timely objection is filed,” the court review the magistrate’s findings 

and recommendations for “clear error on the face of the record.”

No party having made objections, this Court follows the recommendation of the Advisory 

Committee and reviews Judge Beckerman’s Findings and Recommendation for clear error on the 

face of the record. No such error is apparent. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS Judge 

Beckerman’s Findings and Recommendation, Dkt. 17. This case is DISMISSED without 

prejudice for lack of prosecution. See LR 83-12. The Court further finds that any appeal from 

this Order would not be taken in good faith and revokes Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 12th day of February, 2016.

/s/ Michael H. Simon

Michael H. Simon

United States District Judge

Case 2:15-cv-01189-SB Document 20 Filed 02/12/16 Page 2 of 2
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Imported Fire Ant and Household Insects Research: Gainesville, FL
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Gainesville, Florida Center for Medical, Agricultural and Veterinary Entomology Imported Fire Ant and Household Insects Research People & Locations







Nigel  Neal
                        Imported Fire Ant and Household Insects Research

                        




                        
                        Program Support Assistant (Office Automation)
                        Phone: (352) 374-5903
                        
                        
                        Fax: (352) 374-5818(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Pest Management Research: Sidney, MT
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    NPARL
                        Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory
                                    Agricultural Systems Research Unit
                                    Grasshoppers: Their Biology, Identification and ManagementSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Sidney, Montana Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory Pest Management Research PMRU Docs Grasshoppers: Their Biology, Identification and Management: Outbreak and Survey Info Forecast Maps





- NPARL Home
- PMRU Home
- ASRU Home
- Site Highlights
- Outbreak and Survey Info
- ID Tools | Apps
- Grasshopper Management
- IPM Handbook
- USDA Research | Contact Info

Outbreak Info: Grasshopper Forecast 2021headline bar /ARSUserFiles/30320505/grasshopper/Extras/images/Maps/2021 GH hazard map.jpg < Previous MapBack to Outbreak Info >Next Map >


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1751

AN ACT

To extend the deadline for submission of a report by the

Commission to Assess the Organization of the Federal

Government to Combat the Proliferation of Weapons of

Mass Destruction.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF

4 COMMISSION REPORT.

5 Section 712(c)(1) of the Combatting Proliferation of

6 Weapons of Mass Destruction Act of 1996 (contained in

7 Public Law 104–293) is amended by striking ‘‘enactment

8 of this Act’’ and inserting ‘‘first meeting of the Commis9 sion’’.

Passed the Senate March 30, 1998.

Attest:

Secretary.
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1751

AN ACT

To extend the deadline for submission of a report

tion of Weapons of Mass Destruction.the Federal Government to Combat the Proliferaby the Commission to Assess the Organization of
Exhibit 32.5


                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's best knowledge and belief, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
Geodyne Energy Income Limited Partnership II-E ("Issuer") for the period ending
December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 30th day of March, 2005.

                                   GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                   PARTNERSHIP II-E
                                   ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)
1 – ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

BRENDA LAREE GILBERT,

Plaintiff, Civ. No. 6:15-cv-00432-TC

v. ORDER

TYLER HEAD, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________

MCSHANE, Judge:

Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin filed a Findings and Recommendation, ECF No. 24, 

and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. 

Although plaintiff did not file objections, I reviewed the legal principles de novo. United States 

v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude the report is 

correct. Magistrate Judge Coffin’s Findings and Recommendation, ECF No. 24, is adopted. This 

action is dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 30

th day of September, 2015.

_______/s/ Michael J. McShane ________

Michael McShane

United States District Judge

Case 6:15-cv-00432-TC Document 36 Filed 09/30/15 Page 1 of 1