alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Filed 2/16/16 P. v. Williams CA4/1

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. 

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

CORY B. WILLIAMS,

Defendant and Appellant.

 D068671

 (Super. Ct. No. SCD244308)

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, 

Dwayne K. Moring, Judge. Affirmed.

Benjamin Kington for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Cory B. Williams entered guilty pleas to two counts of unlawful sexual intercourse 

with a minor under age 16. (Pen. Code,1 § 261.5, subd. (d).) In 2014 Williams was 

granted probation on various terms and conditions and was ordered to register as a sex 

offender under section 290.006. Williams appealed from his original sentencing.

 

1 All further statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise specified.
2

In case D064768, filed January 29, 2015, this court affirmed the convictions but 

struck the residency requirement in the probation conditions. This court also reversed the 

order requiring Williams to register as a sex offender and remanded for a new hearing on 

the registration issue. 

On remand the court held a new hearing, received additional briefing and the 

report of a psychologist. Once again the trial court exercised its discretion to order 

Williams to register as a sex offender. 

Williams filed a timely notice of appeal. 

Appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 

Cal.3d 436 (Wende) indicating he has not been able to identify any reasonably arguable 

issue for reversal on appeal. Counsel asks this court to review the record for error as 

required by Wende.

We offered Williams the opportunity to file his own brief in this appeal. Williams 

has not responded.2

DISCUSSION

As we have noted, counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 

436 asking this court to review the record for error. Although counsel has not cited 

Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders), counsel has nevertheless complied 

 

2 Since our previous opinion, contained in the clerk's transcript, discusses the facts 

of the underlying offenses, we find it unnecessary to again discuss the facts of those 

offenses here.
3

with Anders by identifying a possible, but not reasonably arguable issue for reversal on 

appeal:

Whether the trial court abused its discretion in ordering Williams to register as a 

sex offender.

We have reviewed the entire record as required by Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436 

and Anders, supra, 386 U.S. 738. We have not been able to identify any reasonably 

arguable issue for reversal on appeal. Competent counsel has represented Williams on 

this appeal.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

HUFFMAN, J.

WE CONCUR:

BENKE, Acting P. J.

O'ROURKE, J.
#### In the Matter of Bernard Fleischer, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, Petitioner.

Respondent has submitted an affidavit dated June 2, 1986, in which he tenders his resignation as an attorney and counselor-at-law. Respondent was admitted to practice by the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, First Judicial Department, on March 13, 1961.

There are 11 charges of professional misconduct pending against this respondent including allegations of issuing hundreds of worthless checks; converting funds to his own use; improperly withholding clients’ escrow funds; failing to fully satisfy three different loans made to him, one such loan resulting in a judgment against respondent for $4,556.83 and his failing to fully satisfy said judgment; improperly refusing *767to file a judgment of divorce on behalf of his client; and neglecting a legal matter entrusted to him.

Respondent indicates that his resignation is freely and voluntarily rendered; that he is not being subjected to coercion or duress; that he is fully aware of the implications of submitting his resignation; and that he could not successfully defend himself on the merits against the charges pending against him.

Under the circumstances herein, respondent’s resignation as a member of the Bar is accepted and directed to be filed; and it is ordered that respondent be disbarred and his name struck from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, effective forthwith. Mollen, P. J., Lazer, Mangano, Bracken and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### United States Mint

# AGENCY:

United States Mint, Department of the Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The United States Mint announces 2021 revisions to include a premium increase in price for the Palladium coins and expansion of the price ranges up to $4,049.99 within the Numismatic Gold, Commemorative Gold, Platinum, and Palladium Products Grid.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Derrick Griffin; Sales and Marketing Directorate; United States Mint; 801 9th Street NW; Washington, DC 20220; or call 202-354-7500.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

An excerpt of the grid with a recent price range for the palladium proof coins appears below:

                    The complete 2021 Pricing of Numismatic Gold, Commemorative Gold, Platinum, and Palladium Products Grid will be available at                     *https://catalog.usmint.gov/​coin-programs/​american-eagle-coins.*

Pricing can vary weekly dependent upon the London Bullion Market Association gold, platinum, and palladium prices weekly average. The pricing for all United States Mint numismatic gold, platinum, and palladium products is evaluated every Wednesday and modified as necessary.

*Authority:*31 U.S.C. 5111, 5112, & 9701.                

Eric Anderson,

Executive Secretary, United States Mint.

[FR Doc. 2021-18730 Filed 8-30-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
# L_2009095EN.01004101.xml

| 9.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 95/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 95/41

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 30 March 2009

endorsing the European Air Traffic Management Master Plan of the Single European Sky ATM Research (SESAR) project

(2009/320/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Article 1(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 219/2007 of 27 February 2007 on the establishment of a Joint Undertaking to develop the new generation European air traffic management system (SESAR) (1),

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Having regard to the Council Resolution of 30 March 2009 on endorsement of the European Air Traffic Management Master Plan of the Single European Sky ATM Research (SESAR) project,

Whereas, the initial version of the European Air Traffic Management Master Plan, resulting from the definition phase of the SESAR project, with major contributions from relevant private stakeholders, constitutes the basis for establishing the SESAR Joint Undertaking’s work programme and the development phase of the SESAR project, subject to the conclusion of sufficient membership agreements,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The European Air Traffic Management Master Plan of the Single European Sky ATM Research (SESAR) project is hereby endorsed.

Done at Brussels, 30 March 2009.

For the Council

The President

P. BENDL

---

(1)  
  OJ L 64, 2.3.2007, p. 1.

1

---
Technical Work Group Meeting 

D R A F T A G E N D A 

Glen Canyon Dam 

Adaptive Management Program 

Technical Work Group Meeting 

Bureau of Indian Affairs 

2 Arizona Center, 400 N. 5th St., Phoenix AZ 

Conference Rooms A&B 

November 7, 2002 

START 

TIME TOPIC PERSON PURPOSE MATERIALS 

9:30 a.m. Welcome and 

Administrative 

Kurt Dongoske 1. Introductions and 

 Determination of Quorum 

2. Review Action Items from 

 Aug. 15-16, 2002 Meeting 

3. Approval of Aug. 15- 16, 2002 

 Meeting Minutes 

4. Legislative Updates 

Agenda 

Action Items 

Draft Minutes 

9:45 a.m. Sequence ordering of 9 

INs and 2 EINs 

Mary Orton Develop a recommendation and 

forward to the AMWG in January 

2003. 

INs 

Organized by 

Sequence 

Order 

↓

11:30 a.m. L U N C H 

Note: During lunch, Mary will integrate the newly-sequenced 11 Ins into the list of sequenced INs, and 

have copies ready for the TWG when it returns from lunch. 

12:30 p.m. Information Needs 

Sequence Order Fatal 

Flaw Analysis and 

Approval 

Mary Orton 

Proposed Motion language: 

1) Approve the sequence order 

and 

2) Further recommend that the 

sequence ordering be revisited in 

five years, or less if warranted, 

and 

3) Further recommend the Budget 

AHC use the document to 

analyze the GCMRC’s annual 

work plan. The Budget AHC will 

use the sequence ordering to 

determine whether the work plan 

addresses the most important and 

urgent items, taking into account: 

the sequence ordering, the core 

monitoring program, unforeseen 

urgent issues that have 

developed, and other items as 

appropriate. 

INs 

Organized by 

Goal 

Suggested 

Re-wording 

on INs 

Document 

TWG Version, 

Sept 2002 

2:45 p.m. B R E A K 

3 p.m. 

Information Needs 

Sequence Order Fatal 

Flaw Analysis and 

Approval (continued) 

Mary Orton 

4:45 p.m. Wrap-up and Adjourn Kurt Dongoske 

 
Technical Work Group Meeting 

D R A F T A G E N D A 

Glen Canyon Dam 

Adaptive Management Program 

Technical Work Group Meeting 

Bureau of Indian Affairs 

2 Arizona Center, 400 N. 5th St., Phoenix AZ 

Conference Rooms A&B 

November 8, 2002 

START 

TIME TOPIC PERSON PURPOSE MATERIALS 

 8 a.m. Welcome and Administrative Kurt Dongoske Introductions 

Determination of Quorum 

Agenda 

8:15 a.m. 1) Update on Non-native fish 

 control 

2) AFGD Proposed fishing 

 regulation changes below 

 Glen Canyon Dam 

Bill Persons Information Non-native 

Fish Control 

8:30 a.m. Budget Ad Hoc Committee 

Report and Action 

Budget AHC Information Budget 

9 a.m. Warm Water Science Plan GCMRC Information 

10 a.m. B R E A K 

10:15 a.m. Cultural Monitoring Results 

Presentations 

Brenda Drye 

Loretta Jackson 

Lisa Leap 

Information 

Cultural 

Monitoring 

Results 

11:30 L U N C H 

12:30 p.m. Basin Hydrology Chris Cutler Information 

Basin 

Hydrology 

12:45 p.m. Status of the EA for the 

Experimental Flows 

Randy Peterson Information 

1 p.m. 1) Report on the Salmonid 

Assessment Trip and 

deliberations on trout disposal 

Steve Gloss Information 

1:30 p.m. Effectiveness Discussion Kurt Dongoske Discussion 

2 p.m. Wrap-up and Adjourn Kurt Dongoske Discussion
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the report of Impac Mortgage Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in thecapacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1)                       The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ Joseph R. Tomkinson                                              |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Joseph R. Tomkinson                                                  |   |   |
| Chief Executive Officer  (principal executive and financial officer) |   |   |
| August 14, 2007                                                      |   |   |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Impac Mortgage Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by ImpacMortgage Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Tennessee Valley Authority

# AGENCY:

Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA).

# ACTION:

Renewal of Federal Advisory Committee.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), the TVA Board of Directors has renewed the Regional Energy Resource Council (RERC) charter for an additional two-year period beginning on July 30, 2021.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Cathy Coffey, 865-632-4494,                         *ccoffey@tva.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Pursuant to FACA and its implementing regulations, and following consultation with the Committee Management Secretariat, General Services Administration (GSA) in accordance with 41 CFR 102-3.60(a), notice is hereby given that the RERC has been renewed for a two-year period beginning July 30, 2021. The RERC will provide advice to TVA on its issues affecting energy resource activities. The RERC was originally established in 2013 to advise TVA on its energy resource activities and the priority to be placed among competing objectives and values. It has been determined that the RERC continues to be needed to provide an additional mechanism for public input regarding energy resource issues. Additionally, we would like to correct the error in the Summary section of the April 28, 2020, Regional Resource Stewardship Council renewal notice published in the                     **Federal Register**                     that misidentified the council as the Regional Energy Resource Council.                

Dated: August 26, 2021.

                        The DFO of the Tennessee Valley Authority and Vice President of External Strategy & Regulatory Affairs, Melanie Farrell, having reviewed and approved this document, is delegating the authority to sign this document to Cathy Coffey, Senior Program Manager of Stakeholder Relations, for purposes of publication in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

Cathy Coffey,

Senior Program Manager, Tennessee Valley Authority.

[FR Doc. 2021-18867 Filed 8-31-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8120-08-P
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Pest Management Research: Sidney, MT
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    NPARL
                        Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory
                                    Agricultural Systems Research Unit
                                    Grasshoppers: Their Biology, Identification and ManagementSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Sidney, Montana Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory Pest Management Research PMRU Docs Grasshoppers: Their Biology, Identification and Management: Outbreak and Survey Info





- NPARL Home
- PMRU Home
- ASRU Home
- Site Highlights
- Outbreak and Survey Info
- ID Tools | Apps
- Grasshopper Management
- IPM Handbook
- USDA Research | Contact Info

Outbreak Info: 2016 Mormon Cricket Survey Mapheadline bar /ARSUserFiles/30320505/grasshopper/Extras/images/Maps/2016_MC.jpg Return to Outbreak Info


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Case 1:15-cv-01940-MA Document 20 Filed 02/21/17 Page 1 of 7
Case 1:15-cv-01940-MA Document 20 Filed 02/21/17 Page 2 of 7
Case 1:15-cv-01940-MA Document 20 Filed 02/21/17 Page 3 of 7
Case 1:15-cv-01940-MA Document 20 Filed 02/21/17 Page 4 of 7
Case 1:15-cv-01940-MA Document 20 Filed 02/21/17 Page 5 of 7
Case 1:15-cv-01940-MA Document 20 Filed 02/21/17 Page 6 of 7
Case 1:15-cv-01940-MA Document 20 Filed 02/21/17 Page 7 of 7
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Manuel LOPEZ-ARCEO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-30139.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*784Submitted April 16, 2007.*

Filed April 20, 2007.

Pamela Jackson Byerly, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Spokane, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Tracy Staab, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Spokane, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Manuel Lopez-Arceo appeals from his sentence imposed following his guilty plea to illegal reentry of a deported alien in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we vacate and remand.

Lopez-Arceo contends that the district court improperly imposed an eight-level increase in his offense level under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(C) based on his prior convictions. In light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in *Lopez v. Gonzales,*— U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 625, 633, 166 L.Ed.2d 462 (2006), the parties have filed a joint motion requesting that we remand the case for re-sentencing. We grant that motion, vacate the sentence, and remand for re-sentencing.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

VACATED and REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT

 

 

 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated November 15, 2004, accompanying the consolidated financial statements of Good Times Restaurants, Inc., also incorporated by reference in the Form S-8 Registration statement of Good Times Restaurants, Inc., and to the use of our name and the statements with respect to us, as appearing under the heading "Experts" in the Registration Statement.

 

 

 

Hein + Associates llp

Denver, Colorado

December 29, 2004
To: All TWG Members

From: Randall Peterson

Subject: Transmittal of Final Draft Strategic Plan

Enclosed in this packet is a copy of the final draft strategic plan, including table of contents,

management objective tables, and appendices. We thought it would be helpful if we included a

description of how the plan was modified since you last reviewed it.

It is important to remember that the plan is dynamic. It likely will be modified in the future, especially as

we move forward in quantifying management objective target levels and gain further understanding of

the Colorado River ecosystem. We have already agreed on the vision, mission, principles, goals, and

management objectives. These are the heart of the plan.

In many ways, preparing the strategic plan has facilitated the discussion and resolution of key program

issues. These have been captured in specific sentences or sections of previous versions as well as the

general tone of the document. Keeping these areas of agreement was paramount as we met our

commitment from the last TWG meeting to restructure the document to read better. As we combined

sections of narrative that were similar, we found many instances of duplication, so the current version of

the plan is more concise. The editors have done a great job. The resulting document is identical to the

previous version in some areas, but quite different in others. The AMWG ad hoc group has reviewed

the plan and made a few changes, but generally is ready to conclude its work with the TWG at the

August 7 meeting and recommend that the AMWG adopt the plan at its Sept 24-25 meeting. Please

carefully review the strategic plan with your AMWG member. In this packet, we have

included an additional copy of just the strategic plan for their use. If you have suggested changes

to plan language you can’t support, please bring alternative language to the Aug 7 TWG meeting. As

noted on the TWG agenda for that meeting, we will seek a TWG recommendation to the AMWG that

the plan be approved.

Thanks for your good work and help,

Randy