alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Jennifer A. Nelson, OSB No. 034086 

j ennifer.nelson@ogletreedeakins.com 

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. 

222 SW Columbia Street, Suite 1500 

Portland, OR 97201 

Telephone: 503.552.2140 

Fax: 503.224.4518 

Jaime N. Cole, WSBA No. 47258 

jcole@brownsterling.com 

Brown & Sterling, P.S. 

P.O. Box 940 

Fall City, WA 98024 

Telephone: 425-222-6374 

Fax: 425-222-6373 

Pro Hac Vice Admission 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Anthony J. Estrada, OSB No. 113764 

aestrada@nw-attomeys.com 

The Law Office of Jon Weiner 

Jon H. Weiner, OSB No. 993944 

jweiner@nw-attomeys.com 

Of Counsel, Harris Law Firm, P.C. 

1415 Commercial St. SE 

Salem, OR 97302 

Telephone: 503-399-7001 

Fax: 503-399-0745 

Of Attorneys for Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

EUGENE DIVISION 

DEBRA MCHUGH, aka DEBRA 

ORMAN, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

GEMTEXT PORTLAND, LLC, et al., 

Defendants. 

1 - [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE 

Case No.: 6:15-cv-01208-AA 

[~ffiSEI)'] ORDER GRANTING 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE 

BROWN & STERLING, P.S. 

P.O. Box 940, Fall City, Washington 98024 

(425) 222-6374 

Case 6:15-cv-01208-AA Document 13 Filed 09/17/15 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATION 

BASED UPON THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, through their counsel, IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby DISMISSED in its entirety, with 

prejudice and without costs (including but not limited to: any statutory costs; attorneys' fees; 

and/or disbursements) to any party. 

Dated: September , 2015 

2 - [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE 

Honorable District Court Judge Ann Aiken 

PRESENTED BY: 

BROWN & STERLING, P.S. 

Is/ Jaime N. Cole 

Jaime N. Cole, WSBA No. 47258 

j cole@brownsterling.com 

P.O. Box940 

Fall City, W A 98024 

Telephone: 425-222-6374 

Fax: 425-222-6373 

Pro Hac Vice Admission 

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, 

SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 

Is/ Jennifer A. Nelson 

Jennifer A. Nelson, OSB No. 034086 

j ennifer.nelson@ogletreedeakins.com 

Telephone: 503.552.2140 

Attorneys for Defendants 

THE LAW OFFICE OF JON H. 

WEINER 

Is/ Anthony J. Estrada 

Anthony J. Estrada, OSB No. 113764 

aestrada@nw -attorneys. com 

Jon H. Weiner, OSB No. 993944 

jweiner@nw-attomeys.com 

Of Counsel, Harris Law Firm, P.C. 

1415 Commercial St. SE 

Salem, OR 97302 

Telephone: 503-399-7001 

Fax: 503-399-0745 

Of Attorneys for Plaintiff 

BROWN & STERLING, P.S. 

P.O. Box 940, Fall City, Washington 98024 

(425) 222-6374 

Case 6:15-cv-01208-AA Document 13 Filed 09/17/15 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 164 (Friday, August 27, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48231-48232]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-18451]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Biological Chemistry and Macromolecular 
Biophysics Integrated Review Group; Synthetic and Biological 
Chemistry A Study Section.
    Date: September 29-30, 2021.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Anita Szajek, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 4187, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-827-6276, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6607080f120748151c070c030d26080f0e48010910"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="88e9e6e1fce9a6fbf2e9e2ede3c8e6e1e0a6efe7fe">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Name of Committee: Biological Chemistry and Macromolecular 
Biophysics Integrated Review Group; Biochemistry and Biophysics of 
Membranes Study Section.
    Date: September 30-October 1, 2021.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 8:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Nuria E Assa-Munt, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4164, MSC 7806, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 451-1323, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b9d8cacad8d4ccd7ccf9dacacb97d7d0d197ded6cf"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a9c8dadac8c4dcc7dce9cadadb87c7c0c187cec6df">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)


[[Page 48232]]


    Dated: August 23, 2021.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-18451 Filed 8-26-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Case 3:15-cv-01587-AA    Document 1-5    Filed 08/20/15    Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 3.1.3



                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                     to the

                      RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       of

                         JEAN PHILIPPE FRAGRANCES, INC.

                                 pursuant to the

                        DELAWARE GENERAL CORPORATION LAW


        Jean Philippe Fragrances, Inc. hereby certifies that:

         A. The name of the Corporation is Jean Philippe Fragrances, Inc. (the
"Corporation"), and its original Certificate of Incorporation was filed with the
Secretary of State of Delaware on May 6, 1985.

        B. The Restated Certificate of Incorporation is hereby amended to
increase the number of actual shares from twenty-one million (21,000,000) to
thirty-one million (31,000,000), by striking out the first full paragraph of
Article FOURTH in its entirety, and substituting in lieu thereof the new first
full paragraph of Article FOURTH as follows:

                 "FOURTH: The aggregate number of shares which the Corporation
shall have authority to issue is thirty-one million (31,000,000) shares
consisting of thirty million (30,000,000) shares, designated as Common Stock, at
par value of $.001 per share, and one million (1,000,000) shares, designated as
Preferred Stock, at a par value of $.001 per share."

        C. The foregoing Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation
of the Corporation was authorized pursuant to Section 141(b) of the Delaware
Corporation Law by the affirmative vote of a majority of the Board of Directors
of the Corporation present at a meeting at which a quorum was present followed
by the affirmative vote of a majority of all of the outstanding shares Common
Stock of the Corporation entitled to vote on the said Amendment to the Restated
Certificate of Incorporation at a meeting at which a quorum was present pursuant
to Section 242 of the Delaware General Corporation Law.


                                       1

<PAGE>



         D. This Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of
Incorporation shall be effective upon the filing of same with the Secretary of
State of Delaware.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have subscribed this document on the date set
forth below and do hereby affirm, under the penalties of perjury, that the
statements contained therein have been examined by us and are true and correct.


Dated:  July 9, 1993
                                             /s/ Jean Madar
                                             ---------------------
                                             Jean Madar, President



                                              /s/ Neil Fogel
                                             ---------------------
                                             Neil Fogel, Secretary


        -Seal-

                                       2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

ERIC L. WILLIAMS,

Petitioner,

v. 

MARION FEATHER, Warden,

Respondent.

3:14-cv-01732-KI

ORDER

KING, Judge

Petitioner's motion for voluntary dismissal (#15) is GRANTED. 

This proceeding is DISMISSED, without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 17th day of February, 2015. 

 /s/ Garr M. King 

Garr M. King

United States District Judge

1 - ORDER

Case 3:14-cv-01732-KI Document 16 Filed 02/17/15 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

DIANA FAY MENCHACA, No. 6:15-cv-01470-HZ

Plaintiff, ORDER

v.

NANCY A. BERRYHILL,

Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

Plaintiff Diana Menchaca brought this action seeking review of the Commissioner’s final 

decision to deny disability insurance benefits (“DIB”). In an October 7, 2016 Opinion & Order, 

the Court reversed the Commissioner’s decision and ordered that the case be remanded for an 

award of benefits. Judgment was also entered on October 7, 2016. 

Plaintiff now seeks an award of fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Defendant has no 

objection to the request. The Court has reviewed the record in the case, the motion, and the 

supporting materials including the award of benefits, the fee agreement with counsel, and the 

recitation of counsel’s hours and services. Applying the standards set by Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 

535 U.S. 789, 796 (2002), the Court finds the requested fees reasonable.
The Court grants the motion [24] and award Plaintiff’s counsel $8,124 in attorney’s fees 

under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Previously, the Court awarded Plaintiff attorney’s fees in the amount 

of $4,874.51 under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. When issuing 

the section 406(b) check for payment to Plaintiff’s attorney, the Commissioner is directed to 

subtract the amount previously awarded under EAJA and send Plaintiff’s attorney the balance of 

$3,249.49 less any applicable processing fees as allowed by statute. Any amount withheld after 

all administrative and court attorney’s fees are paid should be released to the claimant.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated this day of , 2017

 

Marco A. Hernández

United States District Judge
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

CASSI C. FISHER as Guardian ad Litem for No. 2:15-cv-01957-SU

X.S.F., a minor, 

Plaintiff,

v. 

WINDING WATERS CLINIC, PC, an Oregon ORDER

corporation; ELIZABETH POWERS, M.D.;

KEITH DeYOUNG, M.D.; and RENEE

GRANDI, M.D.,

Defendants. 

HERNANDEZ, District Judge,

On February 13, 2017, Magistrate Judge Sullivan issued an Opinion & Order (#53) in

which she denied Defendants' Motion to Compel Genetic Testing and Amended Motion to

Compel Genetic Testing. On February 23, 2017, Defendants filed objections to the Order. On

August 10, 2017, the matter was referred to me pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

72(a).

In accordance with Rule 72(a), "[w]hen a pretrial matter not dispositive of a party's claim

1 - ORDER
or defense is referred to a magistrate judge to hear and decide, the magistrate judge must

promptly conduct the required proceedings and, when appropriate, issue a written order stating

the decision." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a). The standard of review for an order with objections is

"clearly erroneous" or "contrary to law." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) (applying the "clearly

erroneous or contrary to law" standard of review for nondispositive motions). If a ruling on a

motion is not determinative of "a party's claim or defense," it is not dispositive and, therefore, is

not subject to de novo review as are proposed findings and recommendations for dispositive

motions under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). 

I have carefully considered Defendants' objections and conclude they do not provide a

basis to modify Magistrate Judge Sullivan's Order. 

CONCLUSION

The Court AFFIRMS Magistrate Judge Sullivan's Order [53].

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this day of , 2017.

 

MARCO A. HERNANDEZ

United States District Judge

2 - ORDER
zbh-ex107_187.htm



Exhibit 10.7

AMENDMENT TO 

ZIMMER BIOMET HOLDINGS, INC. 

EXECUTIVE PERFORMANCE INCENTIVE PLAN

(Effective as of May 7, 2020)

 

This Amendment to the Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. Executive Performance Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby adopted by Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) effective as of May 7, 2020.

WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Plan for the benefit of a select group of eligible executives of the Company and its subsidiary and affiliated corporations; 

WHEREAS the Plan was amended and restated in its entirety May 7, 2013 and then again effective June 24, 2015, and was further amended effective December 31, 2015; and

WHEREAS, the Company now desires to amend the Plan further.

NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of May 7, 2020, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:


	
 
	
1.
	
Subparagraph 12(a) is amended to read as follows:




(a)  Effective Time. The Plan became effective on May 7, 2013 upon the affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast at the 2013 annual meeting of stockholders.  The Plan was amended as of June 24, 2015 to change the name of the Plan to the Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. Executive Performance Incentive Plan.  The Plan was further amended on December 31, 2015 and May 7, 2020.


	
 
	
2.
	
Subparagraph 12(b) is amended to read as follows:




(b)  Termination and Amendment.  Subject to the limitations set forth in subparagraph (c) below, the Board or its designee may at any time suspend or terminate the Plan and may amend it from time to time in such respects as the Board or its designee may deem advisable, subject to any requirements for stockholder approval imposed by applicable law.

 

 

 

 

 

 



US.127704847.01

 

 

 
 


 

Certified as final:  

/s/ Suketu Upadhyay

Suketu Upadhyay

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

/s/ Pamela Puryear

Pamela Puryear

Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer

 

 

2



US.127704847.01
WILLIE C FORD JR,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D17-0601

Opinion filed March 27, 2017.

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus -- Original Jurisdiction.

Willie C Ford Jr., pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).

ROBERTS, C.J., LEWIS and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 162 (Wednesday, August 25, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 47527]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-18312]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, First-Class 
Package Service, and Parcel Select Service Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: August 25, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
August 9, 2021, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, First-Class 
Package Service, and Parcel Select Service Contract 9 to Competitive 
Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. 
MC2021-122, CP2021-124.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2021-18312 Filed 8-24-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-77,008

EX PARTE RICKY EUGENE JACKSON, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 10CR3044 IN THE 56th DISTRICT COURT

FROM GALVESTON COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of a

controlled substance and sentenced to eight years’ imprisonment. The Applicant did not appeal his

conviction. 

Applicant contends that his due process rights were violated because a forensic scientist did

not follow accepted standards when analyzing evidence and therefore the results of his analyses are

unreliable. A Department of Public Safety report shows that the lab technician who was solely

responsible for testing the evidence in this case is the scientist found to have committed misconduct. 
2

While there is evidence remaining that is available to retest in this case, that evidence was in the

custody of the lab technician in question. This Court believes his actions are not reliable; therefore

custody was compromised, resulting in a due process violation. Applicant is therefore entitled to

relief.

Relief is granted. The judgment in Cause No. 10CR3044 in the 56th District Court of

Galveston County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Galveston

County to answer the charges as set out in the indictment. The trial court shall issue any necessary

bench warrant within 10 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department ofCriminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: March 27, 2013

Do not publish
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1886

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at

3750 North Kedzie Avenue in Chicago, Illinois, as the ‘‘Daniel J. Doffyn

Post Office Building’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 31, 1998

Mr. DURBIN (for himself and Ms. MOSELEY-BRAUN) introduced the following

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 3750 North Kedzie Avenue in Chicago, Illinois, as the ‘‘Daniel J. Doffyn Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF DANIEL J. DOFFYN POST

4 OFFICE BUILDING.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The facility of the United States

6 Postal Service located at 3750 North Kedzie Avenue in

7 Chicago, Illinois, shall be known and designated as the

8 ‘‘Daniel J. Doffyn Post Office Building’’.
2

•S 1886 IS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United

3 States to the facility of the United States Postal Service

4 referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a ref5 erence to the ‘‘Daniel J. Doffyn Post Office Building’’.

Æ
maxr_Ex4_2


		
			Exhibit 4.2
		

		
			 
		

		
			FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
		

		
			MAXAR TECHNOLOGIES INC.
		

		
			2019 INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN
		

		
			 
		

		
			This First Amendment (this “First Amendment”) to the Maxar Technologies Inc. 2019 Incentive Award Plan (“2019 Plan”), is made and adopted by the Board of Directors (“Board”) of Maxar Technologies Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),  on March 27, 2020,  effective as of the date of the Company’s 2020 annual meeting of stockholders, provided that it is approved by the Company’s stockholders on that date (“Amendment Date”).
		

		
			 
		

		
			RECITALS
		

		
			 
		

		
			WHEREAS, the Company maintains the 2019 Plan; and
		

		
			 
		

		
			WHEREAS,  the Board believes it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to amend the 2019 Plan to increase the number of shares reserved under the 2019 Plan.
		

		
			 
		

		
			NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the 2019 Plan is hereby amended as follows, subject to, and effective as of the Amendment Date:
		

		
			 
		

		
			AMENDMENT
		

		
			 
		

		
			1.         Section 3.1(a) of the 2019 Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:
		

		
			 
		

		
			“Subject to Sections 3.1(b) and 12.2, the aggregate number of Shares which may be issued pursuant to Awards under the 2019 Plan is the sum of: (i)  5,075,000 Shares and (ii) any Shares which as of the Effective Date are subject to awards under any Prior Plan which are forfeited or lapse unexercised and which following the Effective Date are not issued under any Prior Plan; provided,  however, no more than 5,075,000 Shares may be issued upon the exercise of Incentive Stock Options. Any Shares distributed pursuant to an Award may consist, in whole or in part, of authorized and unissued Common Stock, treasury Common Stock or Common Stock purchased on the open market.”
		

		
			 
		

		
			2.         This First Amendment shall be and hereby is incorporated into and forms a part of the 2019 Plan, and except as expressly provided herein, all terms and conditions of the 2019 Plan shall remain in full force and effect.