alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006109EN.01000201.xml

| 9.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 109/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 109/2

---

STATE AID — FRANCE, IRELAND AND ITALY

STATE AID — FRANCE, IRELAND AND ITALY

State aid No C 78/2001 (ex NN 22/2001) — Ireland

Exemption from excise duty on mineral oils used as fuel for alumina production in the Shannon region

State aid No C 79/2001 (ex NN 23/2001) — France

Exemption from excise duty on mineral oils used as fuel for alumina production in the Gardanne region

State aid No C 80/2001 (ex NN 26/2001) — Italy

Exemption from excise duty on mineral oils used as fuel for alumina production in Sardinia

Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty

(2006/C 109/02)

(Text with EEA relevance)

By means of the letter dated 7 December 2001, the Commission notified France, Ireland and Italy of its final decision on the abovementioned measures as regards the period until 31 December 2003 and its decision to extend the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty as regards the period as from 1 January 2004. The full text of the decision is published in OJ L 119 of 4.5.2006

The letters by which the Commission notified these Member States of its original decisions to initiate the procedure, and a meaningful summary, have been published in OJ C 30 of 2.2.2002, p. 17, p. 21 and p. 25.

Interested parties may submit their comments on the measures in respect of which the Commission is extending the procedure within one month of the date of publication of this notice and its decision, to:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| State Aid Greffe |
| SPA 3 6/5 |
| B-1049 Brussels |
| Fax No: (32-2) 296 12 42 |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

State Aid Greffe

SPA 3 6/5

B-1049 Brussels

Fax No: (32-2) 296 12 42

These comments will be communicated to France, Ireland and Italy. Confidential treatment of the identity of the interested party submitting the comments may be requested in writing, stating the reasons for the request.

---
Glen Canyon Dam Technical Work Group Meeting

May 16-17, 2002

List of Attachments

No. Subject Presenter / Author

1 Attendance Sheets Members

2 Basin Hydrology Tom Ryan

3 Exp. Flow PowerPoint presentation Randy Peterson

4a

4b

Memo: Implementation Status of the Elements of

the Reasonable and Prudent Alternative from the

Dec. 21, 1994 Biological Opinion on the

Operations of Glen Canyon Dam (dtd 5/8/02)

PowerPoint Presentation

Dennis Kubly

5a

5b

5c

5d

5e

Draft Information Needs (dated 12/14/01)

Table II-7

SCORE Report

PowerPoint Presentation

INs Sequencing Results

Mary Orton

Steve Gloss

Steve Gloss

Steve Gloss

Mary Orton

6a

6b

Cultural PEP Report

Revised TWG Recommendation (from J. Shields)

Mary Barger

7a

7b

7c

GCMRC Draft Report of the Aquatic Protocol

Evaluation Program Panel

TWG AHG Review of Aquatic PEP Report

TWG AHG Review PowerPoint Presentation

Dennis Kubly

8a

8b

FY 2004 Annual Work Plan

Budget Ad Hoc Meeting Notes

Randy Peterson

GCMRC

9 2001 Monitoring Results (PP presentation)  get

from Steve

Steve Gloss

10a

10b

Summary of Sandbar Data PowerPoint Presentation

Colorado River Ecosystem Sand Bar Conditions in

2001: Results from 12 years of Monitoring

(NAU Fact Sheet, April 2002)

Ted Melis

11a

11b

Integrated Water Quality Program Plan, 2002-07

PowerPoint presentation

Steve Gloss
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Cropping Systems Research Laboratory: Lubbock, TX
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us






CSRL Field Day 2018headline bar USDA-ARS  Cropping Systems Research Lab  Field Day
               Field Tour Locations
               Videos from field Day 2018
               Field Day 2018 Virtual Tour
               Pics or it didn't happen!


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rafael Fernandez, Appellant.

The evidence adduced at the suppression hearing was sufficient to find that the defendant voluntarily and knowingly offered his confession after having been advised of his rights and waiving those rights *(see, Miranda v Arizona,*384 US 436, 475). The totality of the circumstances surrounding the confession indicates that the defendant understood the *Miranda*warnings and expressly waived them *(see, North Carolina v Butler,*441 US 369). Mangano, J. P., Niehoff, Hooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.
1 ... S eeT EX . R. A PP . P. 47. 4. 

## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICTOFTEXAS FORT WORTH NOS. 2 - 07 - 05 8- CR 2- 07 - 05 9- CR JER O M E M . H A M I LTO N AP P E L LA NT V . THE STATE OF TE XA S STATE

----- ----- FR O M THE 3 96 DI STRI CT CO URT O F TARRA NT CO UN TY TH

----- ----- 

### M E M ORANDU M OP I NI ON 1 

### AND J UDGME NT

----- ----- W e h ave co ns i d e re d app el l ant ’ s “M ot i ons To Di sm i ss A ppe al . ” The
m o ti o n s c o m p l yw i th ru l e 4 2 .2 (a ) o f th e ru l e s o f a p p e l l a te p ro c e d u re . T EX . R. A PP . P. 42 . 2( a) . N o deci si on of t hi s cour thavi ng been del i ver ed bef or e w e re c e i v e d th e m o ti o n s , w e g ra n t th e m o ti o n s a n d d i s m i s s th e a p p e a l s . See T EX . R. A PP . P . 4 2 .2 (a ), 4 3 .2 (f). P E R C U R I A M PA N EL F: G A RD N ER, J. ; CA YC E, C. J. ; an d L I V I N G STO N , J. DO NO T P UBLI SH T EX . R. A PP . P. 47. 2( b)DEL I VERE D: Apr i l 3, 2008
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 1, 2012

p0125 

# Order

February 1, 2012

143778

LINDA M. SHEPPARD, Claimant-Appellant,

v SC: 143778 COA: 300681 Washtenaw CC: 10-000383-AE MEIJER GREAT LAKES LIMITED, Employer-Appellee,

and

STATE OF MICHIGAN, DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, LABOR & EC ONOMIC GROWTH, UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE AGENCY, Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 12, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND th is case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted.
# EUR-Lex - 52006AP0533 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52006AP0533

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of an Arrangement between the European Community and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway on the modalities of those states' participation in the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union (COM(2006)0178 - C6-0358/2006 - 2006/0063 (CNS)) **

*
Official Journal 317 E , 23/12/2006 P. 0060 - 0061 *

20061223

P6_TA(2006)0533

Modalities of Iceland and Norway's participation in the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Members States of the European Union *

European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of an Arrangement between the European Community and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway on the modalities of those states' participation in the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union (COM(2006)0178 — C6-0358/2006 — 2006/0063 (CNS))

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2006)0178) [1],

- having regard to Article 62(2)(a), Article 66 and Article 300(2), first subparagraph, first line, of the EC Treaty,

- having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0358/2006),

- having regard to Rules 51, 83(7) and 43(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A6-0423/2006);

1. Approves the conclusion of the Arrangement;

2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission, and the governments and parliaments of the Member States, the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
1 – OPINION & ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

ANGELA NAILS, 

Plaintiff, No. 3:15-cv-1032-JE

v. 

OPINION & ORDER 

ERIC BEACH,

 Defendant.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:

Plaintiff brings this “Motion to Reopen” in response to the Court’s order dismissing 

Plaintiff’s complaint with prejudice. Plaintiff’s motion is denied. 

On September 17, 2015, this Court adopted Magistrate Judge Jelderks’ Findings and 

Recommendation (F&R) dismissing Plaintiff's complaint. Plaintiff was given leave to file an 

amended complaint curing the defects described in the F&R. Plaintiff was warned that if she 

failed to file such an amended complaint, the case would be dismissed with prejudice.

On November 5, 2015, the Court entered the following order:

Case 3:15-cv-01032-JE Document 28 Filed 05/03/16 Page 1 of 2
2 – OPINION & ORDER

Because Plaintiff did not receive copies of the Order when originally issued because the 

Court did not have her current address at the time of issuance, Plaintiff is granted an 

extension until December 7, 2015 to file her Amended Complaint, if she so chooses. If 

Plaintiff fails to file such an amended complaint, the case will be dismissed with 

prejudice. 

ECF 15. On November 25, 2015, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint; however, the amended 

complaint was still deficient and was therefore dismissed with prejudice. 

The entirety of Plaintiff’s current motion is as follows: “I did not receive order to amend 

my complaint--request to reopen.” Pl. Mot. Reopen, ECF 27. The fact that Plaintiff filed an 

amended complaint strongly suggests that, after the Court sent its order to Plaintiff’s current 

mailing address, Plaintiff received the order dismissing her complaint and allowing her leave to 

amend. Even if Plaintiff did not receive the order, her amended complaint was nevertheless 

accepted and evaluated by the Court; the complaint failed to comply with the Federal Rules of 

Civil Procedure and was therefore properly dismissed.

CONCLUSION 

Plaintiff’s “Motion to Reopen” [27] is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this ____________ day of __________________________ , 2016.

________________________________________________ 

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-01032-JE Document 28 Filed 05/03/16 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 11
<TABLE>

                               STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER PARTNERSHIP INTEREST

<CAPTION>
                                                     Three Months         Three Months         Nine Months           Nine Months
                                                         Ended               Ended                Ended                 Ended
                                                  September 30, 1996   September 30, 1995   September 30, 1996    September 30, 1995
                                                  ------------------   ------------------   ------------------    ------------------
<S>                                                     <C>               <C>                  <C>                   <C>
Net loss-Limited Partners                               $(7,729)          $(2,622,052)         $(4,839,643)          $(8,165,772)
                                                        =======           ===========          ===========           =========== 

Average Class A and B limited partnership                                                 
 interests outstanding                                      921                   921                  921                   921
                                                        =======           ===========          ===========           =========== 
                                                                                          
Net loss per Class A and B limited partnership                                            
 interest                                               $    (8)          $    (2,847)         $    (5,255)          $    (8,866)
                                                        =======           ===========          ===========           =========== 
</TABLE>
#### PRINCE, Respondent, v. GROSSMAN, Appellant.

(Common Pleas of New York City and County,

Additional General Term.

December 16, 1895.)

Action by Herman Prince against Charles Grossman. A. H. Sarasohn, for appellant. J. Levy, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
#### Hezekiah PIERCE *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 05-230

206 S.W.3d 247

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered March 31, 2005

*Jonathan T. Lane,*for appellant.

No response.

Per Curiam.

Hezekiah Pierce, by his attorney, Jonathan T. Lane has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the notice of appeal was not filed in a timely manner due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion, which we will treat as a motion for belated appeal. *See Terry v. State,*272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981); *In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases,*265 Ark. 964 (1979) *(per curiam).*

The motion for belated appeal is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.
RE: Case No. 15-0390 DATE

COA #: 12-14-00261-CV TC#: 2013C-11

STYLE:NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, L.L.C.

v. KEN LANDERS AND CLARLINDA LANDERS

A petition for review was filed today in 

above-styled case. Respondent may file eith

response, or a waiver of response. If you f

waiver, the Court will not grant the petition 

first requesting a response. (Tex. R. App. P. 

There is no fee for a response or a waiver.

MS. CATHY S. LUSK

CLERK, TWELFTH COURT OF 

1517 WEST FRONT, SUITE 

TYLER, TX 75702
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of

Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Richard L. Bergmark, Chief Financial Officer of Core Laboratories N.V. (the "Company"), hereby certify that the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the "Report").

I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: July 25, 2008 | /s/ Richard L. Bergmark       
|------------------- | ------------------------------
|                    | Name: Richard L. Bergmark     
|                    | Title: Chief Financial Officer
|                    |
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Las Cruces, New Mexico
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home People & Locations







Charlene A Gamboa
                        Location Support Staff

                        




                        
                        Administrative Officer
                        Phone: (575) 646-2964
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
# C_2006072EN.01001501.xml

| 24.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/15

---

Notice concerning a request in accordance with Article 30 of Directive 2004/17/EC — Extension of the period

Request made on behalf of a Member State

(2006/C 72/05)

On 20 February 2006 the Commission received a request in accordance with Article 30(4) of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors (1).

1

This request, which comes from the Republic of Finland, concerns the production (including combined heat and power) and sale of electricity in that country. The request was published in Official Journal of the European Union
   C 59 of 11.3.2006. The initial period expires on 21 May 2006.

Official Journal of the European Union

Given that the Commission departments need to obtain and examine further information and in compliance with the provisions laid down in the third sentence of Article 30(6), the period within which the Commission must take a decision on this request is extended by one month.

The final period will therefore expire on 22 June 2006.

---

(1)  OJ L 134, 30.4.2004, p. 1.

1

---
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1736

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade for the vessel BETTY JANE.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 10, 1998

Mr. ROBB introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

BETTY JANE.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CERTIFICATE OF DOCUMENTATION.

4 Notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

5 Act, 1920 (46 U.S.C. App. 883), section 8 of the Act of

6 June 19, 1886 (24 Stat. 81, chapter 421; 46 U.S.C. App.

7 289), and sections 12106 and 12108 of title 46, United

8 States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may issue
2

•S 1736 IS

1 a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorse2 ment for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

3 BETTY JANE, Virginia registration number VA 7271 P.

Æ
# L_2009056EN.01001601.xml

| 28.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 56/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 56/16

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 26 February 2009

appointing a German member of the European Economic and Social Committee

(2009/168/EC, Euratom)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 259 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 167 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2006/524/EC, Euratom of 11 July 2006 appointing Czech, German, Estonian, Spanish, French, Italian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Luxembourgish, Hungarian, Maltese, Austrian, Slovenian and Slovak members of the European Economic and Social Committee (1),

Having regard to the proposal of the German Government,

Having regard to the opinion of the Commission,

Whereas a member’s seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the resignation of Mr Erhard OTT,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Mr Armin DUTTINÉ, Ver.di-Bundesvorstand — Leiter EU Verbindungsbüro, is hereby appointed to the European Economic and Social Committee for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 20 September 2010.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 26 February 2009.

For the Council

The President

I. LANGER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 207, 28.7.2006, p. 30.

1

---
75,$/

Case 3:15-cv-01857-SI Document 409-15 Filed 10/15/20 Page 1 of 5
How to Start a campaign with the correct Contact List 

1) Log In To POM

2) Click on Home on the Left Side of the screen

35

3:15-cv-01857

35-1

Case 3:15-cv-01857-SI Document 409-15 Filed 10/15/20 Page 2 of 5
3) Select Campaign Manager 

4) Find the correct campaign name 

5) Make sure the correct contact list is loaded 

35-2

Case 3:15-cv-01857-SI Document 409-15 Filed 10/15/20 Page 3 of 5
6) Click on the play button 

7) Click on Monitor and verify Campaign is running 

35-3

Case 3:15-cv-01857-SI Document 409-15 Filed 10/15/20 Page 4 of 5
35-4

Case 3:15-cv-01857-SI Document 409-15 Filed 10/15/20 Page 5 of 5