alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32(b)
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Murray United Development Corp.
on Form 10-KSB for the period ending July 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Anthony Campo, Chairman of the
Board and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date:  October 24, 2006                  / s /  Anthony Campo
                                         ------------------------------
                                         ANTHONY CAMPO,
                                         Chairman of the Board and
                                         Chief Financial or Accounting Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with Quarterly Report of Waypoint Financial Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
H. Moss, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
(S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


/s/ James H. Moss
-----------------
James H. Moss,
Chief Financial Officer



November 13, 2002
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the report of Impac Mortgage Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Joseph R. Tomkinson
|Joseph R. Tomkinson    
|Chief Executive Officer
|October 20, 2004       



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Richard J. Johnson 
|Richard J. Johnson     
|Chief Financial Officer
|October 20, 2004       



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Impac Mortgage Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Impac Mortgage Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# L_2009285EN.01004101.xml

| 31.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 285/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 285/41

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 27 October 2009

appointing one Dutch member of the European Economic and Social Committee

(2009/798/EC, Euratom)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 259 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 167 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2006/651/EC, Euratom (1),

Having regard to the proposal of the Dutch Government,

Having regard to the opinion of the Commission,

Whereas a member’s seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr J.W. VAN DEN BRAAK,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Ms J.A. VAN DEN BANDT-STEL, permanent gedelegeerde VNO-NCW te Brussel (Group I — Employers' Group), as indicated by the Dutch Minister for Economic Affairs is hereby appointed as a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 20 September 2010.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the day of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 27 October 2009.

For the Council

The President

C. BILDT

---

(1)  
  OJ L 269, 28.9.2006, p. 13.

1

---
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 12
                                Computation of
                      Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                (in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                        Years Ended December 31,
                                        -----------------------------------------------------
                                          1998      1997        1996        1995        1994 
<S>                                     <C>       <C>         <C>         <C>          <C>
Earnings:
Earnings (loss) before income taxes     $30,570   $(81,644)   $(93,534)   $(121,240)   $2,299
Add:
Interest on Debt                         17,967      9,314       2,254        1,602       463 
                                        -----------------------------------------------------
  Earnings                              $48,537   $(72,330)   $(91,280)   $(119,638)   $2,762
                                        -----------------------------------------------------

Fixed Charges:
Interest on Debt                        $17,967   $  9,314    $  2,254    $   1,602    $  463
  Fixed Charges                         $17,967   $  9,314    $  2,254    $   1,602    $  463
                                        -----------------------------------------------------
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges(1)      2.70         --          --           --      5.97
                                        =====================================================
</TABLE>

(1)  The ratio of earnings to fixed charges has been computed by dividing 
earnings available for fixed charges (earnings before income taxes plus fixed 
charges less capitalized interest) by fixed charges (interest expense plus 
capitalized interest and the portion of rental expense which represents 
interest).

(2)  Earnings available for fixed charges of ($72,330,000), ($91,280,000), and 
($119,638,000) were inadequate to cover fixed charges of $9,314,000, $2,254,000 
and $1,602,000 for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995, 
respectively.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Randolf MOORE, a/k/a Randy, a/k/a Booney, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 07-6004.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 11, 2007.

Decided: May 22, 2007.

Randolf Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Randolf Moore seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appeal-able unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 *340U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dis-positive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Moore has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
No. 69170 

# FILED
MAY 0 9 2016 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

ROBERTO SOLANO, Petitioner,
vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE ROB BARE, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and THE CITY OF LAS VEGAS, Real Party in Interest.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA ORDER DENYING PETITION This is a petition for a writ of mandamus challenging the district court's dismissal of petitioner's appeal for failure to prosecute. The petition was filed November 17, 2015. Although "Mlle petitioner shall submit with the petition an appendix," NRAP 21(a)(4) (emphasis added), an appendix to the petition was not received until December 10, 2015. Petitioner did not submit the appendix with his petition; thus he did not demonstrate circumstances warranting our review, see Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) ("Petitioners carry the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted.").

Moreover, petitioner requests a writ mandating the respondent district court hear his appeal on the merits. "The Nevada Constitution vests the district courts with final appellate jurisdiction in all cases arising in the justices' courts." Id. at 227, 88 P.3d at 843; see Nev. Const. art 6, § 6. This court has generally declined to consider writ petitions that request review of a district court's decision when acting in its appellate capacity, save for a few exceptions. State v. Eighth Judicial

(0) 1947A 

### e.Saitta Hardesty

J. J. Dist. Court (Hedland), 116 Nev. 127, 134, 994 P.2d 692, 696 (2000). We conclude that petitioner fails to demonstrate an exception to our general rule, as he fails to demonstrate the district court "improperly refused to exercise its jurisdiction, . . . exceeded its jurisdiction, or . . . exercised its discretion in an arbitrary or capricious manner." Id.; see also NRS 34.160; NRS 177.015(1); NRS 189.060; NRS 189.065; State v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court (Armstrong), 127 Nev. 927, 931-32, 267 P.3d 777, 780 (2011) (defining arbitrary or capricious exercise of discretion and manifest abuse of discretion).

Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.'

J.

cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge Mueller Hinds & Associates Attorney General/Carson City Las Vegas City Attorney Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
'The motion to strike City of Las Vegas as the real party in interest and petitioner's motion to amend the petition by removing party of interest are denied as moot. We direct the clerk of the court to file petitioner's appendix received December 10, 2015, and the amended petition received on December 9, 2015.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2
(0) 1947A Atez
#### VICTOR LA BRUNO, *ET AL.,*PLAINTIFFS-PETITIONERS, CROSS-RESPONDENTS, v. ALONZO W. LAWRENCE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, CROSS-PETITIONER.

See same case below: 64 *N. J. Super. 570.*

*Messrs. Winetslcy & Brody*for the petitioners, cross-respondents.

*Messrs. McGlynn, Stein & McGlynn*for the respondent, cross-petitioner.

March 13, 1961.

Denied.
Technical Work Group Meeting 

FINAL AGENDA 

Glen Canyon Dam 

Adaptive Management Program 

Technical Work Group Meeting 

Bureau of Indian Affairs 

2 Arizona Center, 400 N. 5th St., Phoenix AZ 

12th Floor, Conference Rooms A&B 

June 30, 2003 

START 

TIME TOPIC PERSON PURPOSE MATERIALS 

9:30 a.m. Welcome and 

Administrative 

Randy Peterson 

1. Introductions and 

 Determination of Quorum 

2. Review Action Items from 

 May 28 & 30, 2003 Meeting 

3. Approval of May 28 & 30, 

 2003 Meeting Minutes 

Agenda 

Action Items & 

Draft Minutes 

9:50 a.m. HBC AHG Update 

Budget AHG Update 

Steve Gloss Information and discussion 

Ad Hoc 

Group 

Updates 

9:45 a.m. AHCIO Presentation Randy Seaholm 

Mary Orton 

Action AHCIO 

Presentation 

11:45 a.m. L U N C H 

12:45 p.m. FY 2004 Budget and 

Work Plan 

Denny Fenn Information and discussion FY 2004 

Budget & 

Work Plan 

2:45 p.m. B R E A K 

3 p.m. Trade-off Analysis Josh Korman Information and discussion Trade-off 

Analysis

5 p.m. Wrap-up and Adjourn Randy Peterson 
Technical Work Group Meeting 

FINAL AGENDA 

Glen Canyon Dam 

Adaptive Management Program 

Technical Work Group Meeting 

Bureau of Indian Affairs 

2 Arizona Center, 400 N. 5th St., Phoenix AZ 

12th Floor, Conference Rooms A&B 

July 1, 2003 

START 

TIME TOPIC PERSON PURPOSE MATERIALS 

 8 a.m. Welcome and 

Administrative 

Randy Peterson Introductions 

Determination of Quorum 

Agenda 

8:15 a.m. Modification to Non-native 

Mechanical Removal Steve Gloss Recommendation to AMWG 

8:45 a.m. FY 2004 Budget and 

Work Plan 

Denny Fenn Information and discussion FY 2004 

Budget & 

Work Plan 

10 a.m. B R E A K 

10:15 a.m. FY 2004 Budget and 

Work Plan (continued) 

Denny Fenn Recommendation to AMWG 

12 noon Wrap-up and Adjourn 

- next TWG Meeting 

 and agenda 

Randy Peterson Discussion
February 7 , 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

GINGER DEEANNA FISHE R , Appellant

NO. 14

- 11

- 01030

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
Certification of Principal Financial Officer
I, Paul E. Martin, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K Enstar Income/Growth Program Six-A, L.P.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) [Reserved];  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure control andprocedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as ofthe end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evalutation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting;and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: April 14, 2004 /s/ Paul E. MartinPaul E. MartinSenior Vice President andCorporate Controller (Principal Financial Officer andPrincipal Accounting Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<CIK>                              0000850506
<NAME>                             GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LTD PARTNERSHIP II-F
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                       DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                  741,852
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                           334,137
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      1,075,989
<PP&E>                               11,773,778
<DEPRECIATION>                        9,341,745
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        3,564,889
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    89,532
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                            3,447,450
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          3,564,889
<SALES>                               2,191,389
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      2,766,582
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         2,537,024
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         229,558
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     229,558
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                            229,558
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              0.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0
        

</TABLE>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Davis, California
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Davis, California





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Research Programs and Projects at this LocationARS research is organized into National Programs. Within each National Program are research projects. Listed below are  the National Programs and research projects currently conducted at this location.
Clicking on a National Program (NP) will take you  to the main ARS site for more information on the program. Clicking on a research  project title will take you to more information on the project.  Current View: All Projects   Show All Projects ||
         Appropriated Projects Only


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit 10.5(b)



SCHEDULE OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS WITH

INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENTS



|Name                   |  | Date of Agreement 
|---------------------- |  | ------------------
|Robert V. Ahlgren      |  | April 1, 2002     
|Michael K. Bresson     |  | December 7, 2001  
|Dennis Brown           |  | April 1, 2003     
|Frank H. Jellinek, Jr. |  | December 7, 2001  
|Gary J. Marmontello    |  | December 7, 2001  
|Peter Scheu            |  | December 7, 2001  
|Michael S. Smith       |  | June 18, 2003     
|Mark F. Stuppy         |  | December 7, 2001  
|Stephen K. Wiatt       |  | December 7, 2001  
|Stephen R. Hardis      |  | October 1, 2001   
|R. Jeffrey Harris      |  | December 7, 2001  
|Joe L. Roby            |  | December 7, 2001  
|Kenneth F. Yontz       |  | December 7, 2001  
|William H. Binnie      |  | December 7, 2001  
|Don H. Davis, Jr.      |  | December 7, 2001  
|Christopher L. Doerr   |  | December 7, 2001  
|Richard W. Vieser      |  | December 7, 2001  
|Mary G. Puma           |  | September 30, 2003
|Simon B. Rich          |  | September 30, 2003