alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 167 (Wednesday, September 1, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49001-49002]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-18893]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Patent and Trademark Office

[Docket No. PTO-C-2021-0036]


Performance Review Board

AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of revised board members.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In conformance with the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, the 
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) announces the 
appointment of persons to serve as members of its Performance Review 
Board (PRB). This is an update to the recently published Federal 
Register notice (published on August 4, 2021), to reflect the changes 
made to the board members serving in the Chair and Acting General 
Counsel positions due to the departure of Coke Stewart, who was 
Performing the Functions and Duties of the Deputy Under Secretary of 
Commerce for Intellectual Property and Deputy Director of the USPTO.

ADDRESSES: Office of Human Resources, USPTO, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, 
VA 22313-1450.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lari B. Washington, Acting Director, 
Human Capital Management, USPTO, at 571-272-5187.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The membership of the USPTO PRB is as 
follows:
    David L. Berdan, Chair, Performing the Functions and Duties of the 
Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Deputy 
Director of the USPTO.
    Frederick W. Steckler, Vice Chair, Chief Administrative Officer, 
USPTO.
    Andrew I. Faile, Acting Commissioner for Patents, USPTO.
    David S. Gooder, Commissioner for Trademarks, USPTO.
    Dennis J. Hoffman, Chief Financial Officer, USPTO.
    Henry J. Holcombe, Chief Information Officer, USPTO.
    David M. Shewchuk, Acting General Counsel, USPTO.
    Mary Critharis, Chief Policy Officer and Director for International 
Affairs, USPTO.
    Gerard F. Rogers, Chief Administrative Trademark Judge, USPTO.
    Scott R. Boalick, Chief Administrative Patent Judge, USPTO.
    Bismarck Myrick, Director of the Office of Equal Employment 
Opportunity and Diversity, USPTO.
    Cara Duckworth, Acting Chief Communications Officer, USPTO.
    Alternates:
    Richard Seidel, Deputy Commissioner for Patents, USPTO.

[[Page 49002]]

    Greg Dodson, Deputy Commissioner for Trademark Administration, 
USPTO.

Andrew Hirshfeld,
Commissioner for Patents, Performing the Functions and Duties of the 
Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of 
the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
[FR Doc. 2021-18893 Filed 8-31-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-15-P
NUMBER 13-20-00427-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

IN RE THOMAS PETROLEUM HOLDINGS, LLC, C.L. THOMAS, INC., 

AND C.L. THOMAS HOLDINGS INVESTMENTS, LLC

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

ORDER

Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Tijerina

Order Per Curiam

Relators Thomas Petroleum Holdings, LLC, C.L. Thomas, Inc., and C.L. Thomas 

Holdings Investments, LLC filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause. By 

six issues, relators contend that the trial court abused its discretion by ordering them to 

produce documents protected by the attorney-client privilege. By motion for temporary 

relief, relators request that we stay the trial court’s September 16, 2020 order granting the 

motion to compel filed by real party in interest Jeffrey Johanson. 

The Court, having examined and fully considered the motion for temporary relief, 

is of the opinion that it should be granted. Accordingly, we GRANT the motion for 
2

temporary relief and ORDER the September 16, 2020 “Amended Order Granting 

Defendant’s Motion to Compel” to be STAYED pending further order of this Court. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10.

The Court requests that the real party in interest, Johanson, or any others whose 

interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to the petition for 

writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from the date of this order. See 

id. R. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

19th day of October, 2020.
<PAGE>
 
Exhibit 12. Computation of Earnings to Fixed Charges

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   Predecessor                      The Company
                                           ------------------------       -------------------------------
                                           Year ended September 30,          Year ended September 30,
                                             1994            1995           1996       1997        1998
                                           --------        --------       --------   --------   ---------
<S>                                        <C>             <C>            <C>        <C>        <C>
Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                         $    380        $    723       $  1,013   $  2,962   $   7,884
  Portion of rental expense
   representative of interest                   167             465            883      1,267       1,689
                                           --------        --------       --------   --------   ---------
Total fixed charges                             547           1,188          1,896      4,229       9,573
                                           ========        ========       ========   ========   =========
 Earnings:
  Income before income taxes               $  1,213        $    852       $  6,896   $  7,916   $   7,227
  Fixed charges                                 547           1,188          1,896      4,229       9,573
                                           --------        --------       --------   --------   ---------
Total earnings                                1,760           2,040          8,792     12,145      16,800
                                           ========        ========       ========   ========   =========
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges         3.2 to 1        1.7 to 1       4.6 to 1   2.9 to 1   1.75 to 1
</TABLE>
#### CROWELL, Respondent, v. CROWELL, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.

December 2, 1895.)

Action by Charles B. Crowell against Lidie S. Crowell for divorce. From an order placing the cause on the circuit court calendar for the month of June, 1895, to be heard in Queens county, defendant appeals.

D. C. Calvin, for appellant.

McKoon & Luckey, for respondent.

PRATT, J.

The stipulation obviously contemplated a speedy trial, which had, however, been evaded, and defendant showed no eagerness to bring it on. Under the circumstances, the plaintiff had a right to regard the stipulation as abandoned, and move the trial. The proper county was Queens, and, when defendant objected to Kings county, the special term judge properly ordered it to he tried there. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**1283 KA 12-00369** 
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, VALENTINO, WHALEN, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JURIMAUL K. EDWARDS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (VINCENT F. GUGINO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (RYAN D. HAGGERTY OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Michael L. D’Amico, J.), rendered February 9, 2012. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and unlawful possession of marihuana.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed and the matter is remitted to Erie County Court for proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him, following his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16 [12]) and unlawful possession of marihuana (§ 221.05), defendant contends that County Court erred in refusing to suppress evidence seized as the result of an unlawful search and seizure. We reject that contention. Defendant was stopped at a traffic checkpoint in the City of Buffalo where, according to the testimony of the officer in charge of the checkpoint, the police were checking for registration, inspection, seat belt and other traffic related infractions. Every vehicle that went through the checkpoint was stopped. When defendant’s vehicle was stopped, a police officer smelled marihuana in the vehicle and, after defendant was asked to leave the vehicle, the officer observed marihuana in plain view in the vehicle.

We reject defendant’s contention that the “main purpose” of the checkpoint was general crime control. Rather, the evidence at the suppression hearing established that the checkpoint was established as a “safety” checkpoint ( People v Dugan , 57 AD3d 300, 300, lv denied 11 NY3d 924). We further conclude that the checkpoint was effective in advancing that interest ( see People v Scott , 63 NY2d 518, 528-529). Finally, we conclude that the degree of intrusion on liberty and**-2- 1283 KA 12-00369** 

privacy interests was minimal ( see id . at 526-527; Dugan , 57 AD3d at 300). Unlike in People v Trotter (28 AD3d 165, lv denied 6 NY3d 839), where the checkpoint was conducted as part of a longer campaign to address general crime concerns, there is no evidence here to suggest that the checkpoint was part of a broader program of general crime control, or that it was “no more than a ‘key pragmatic tool’ ” in a larger campaign to control crime ( id. at 170).

Entered: December 21, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
**EXHIBIT 31.1**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERI, Katherine D. Crothall, President and Chief Executive Officer of Animas Corporation, certifythat:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Animas Corporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of Animas Corporation as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. Animas Corporation’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for Animas Corporation and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to Animas Corporation, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of Animas Corporation’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in Animas Corporation’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during Animas Corporation’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, Animas Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.5. Animas Corporation’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to Animas Corporation’s auditors and theaudit committee of Animas Corporation’s board of directors: (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonable likelyto adversely affect Animas Corporation’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in Animas Corporation’s internal controlover financial reporting.     Date: August 15, 2005      By:      */s/ Katherine D. Crothall*         Katherine D. Crothall
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of mPhase Technologies, Inc., a New Jersey corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10K/A
(Amendment No.3) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Martin Smiley, EVP, Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel of the Company certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                    
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.

/s/ Martin Smiley 
Martin Smiley 
EVP, CFO and General Counsel

December 3, 2010

---
Exhibit 23.01


Securities
and Exchange Commission
 100 F
Street, N.E.
 Washington,
DC 20549
 
 
 
 
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form
S-8 (Nos. 333-153151, No. 333-142199, No. 333-142202, No. 033-52387,
No. 333-127223, No. 333-51418, No. 333-49392, No. 333-47194,
No. 333-47665, No. 333-47667, No. 033-65932, No. 033-65930,
and No. 033-28534) of AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. of our report dated
February 20, 2009 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting, which appears in the Annual Report to
Unitholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form
10-K.  We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report
dated February 20, 2009 relating to the financial statement schedules, which
appears in this Form 10-K.
 
 
 
 
 /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
 New York,
New York
 February
20, 2009
  
  
 
 
 
 Securities
and Exchange Commission
 100 F
Street, N.E.
 Washington,
DC 20549
 
 
 
 
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form
S-3 (No. 333-64886) and Form S-8 (No. 333-47192) of AllianceBernstein L.P. of
our report dated February 20, 2009 relating to the financial statements and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in the
Annual Report to Unitholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.  We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our
report dated February 20, 2009 relating to the financial statement schedules,
which appears in this Form 10-K.
 
 
 
 
 /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
 New York,
New York
 February
20, 2009
**EX-21.1**

**SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**

 

 
| **Name of Subsidiary**               | ** ** | **State of Incorporation** |
|--------------------------------------|------------|----------------------------|
|                                 |       |                       |
| Impac Funding Corporation*           |       | California                 |
|                                 |       |                       |
| Impac Warehouse Lending Group, Inc.  |       | California                 |
|                                 |       |                       |
| IMH Assets Corp.                     |       | California                 |
|                                 |       |                       |
| Impac Commercial Capital Corporation |       | California                 |

 

 

 

* Impac Funding Corporation owns 100% of the common stock of Impac Secured Assets

  Corporation, a California corporation. Impac Funding Corporation does business in various

  states under the following names: Impac Lending Group and Impac Home Loans.
ANTONIO DOSSIE
,
Petitioner,

v.

FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW
, Respondent. ___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSIT ION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 4798

Opinion filed May 5, 2015.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari

-- Original Jurisdiction

. Antonio Dossie, pro se , Petitioner.

Sarah J. Rumph, General Counsel, Florida Commission on Offender Review, Tallahassee

, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits

.
BENTON, CLARK, and MAKAR, JJ.

, CONCUR.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         587,072
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,928,503
<ALLOWANCES>                                   229,719
<INVENTORY>                                    653,377
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,284,927
<PP&E>                                       8,423,939
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,612,065)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,118,872
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       35,320,497
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,220
<OTHER-SE>                                (14,289,716)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,118,872
<SALES>                                     43,145,476
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            43,145,476
<CGS>                                       57,111,369
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               57,111,369
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               750,058
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             387,263
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (15,103,314)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (15,103,314)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (15,103,314)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.29)
        

</TABLE>
#### VINELAND SHOPPING CENTER, INC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. LOUIS DE MARCO, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

See same case below: 65 *N. J. Super.*223.

*Messrs. Lipman & Oasella*for the petitioner.

*Mr. Joseph Tuso*and *Mr. Thomas K. J. Tuso*for the respondent.

March 13, 1961.

Granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                        178,661
<SECURITIES>                                   77,962         
<RECEIVABLES>                                 186,216
<ALLOWANCES>                                    5,415
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              468,872 
<PP&E>                                        129,035
<DEPRECIATION>                                 49,615     
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                736,668
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         186,323
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           76
<OTHER-SE>                                    375,668
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  736,668
<SALES>                                             0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              553,484
<CGS>                                               0         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 655,093 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                3,303
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              2,254
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (93,534)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (9,752)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (83,782)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (3,412) 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                 (87,194)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.21)         
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (1.21)
        


</TABLE>
Document

Consent to Temporary Reduction of Biweekly Installments of Base Salary
Reference is hereby made to that certain Employment Agreement between the undersigned (“Executive”) and PBF Investments LLC (“Company”) dated as of September4, 2014 (the “Employment Agreement”).  Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Employment Agreement.
WHEREAS, due to the Company’s financial circumstances arising from current market and other conditions that are adversely impacting the business (collectively, “Market Conditions”), the Company and its affiliates are undertaking a number of short-term initiatives to temporarily reduce operating expenses and desire to implement reductions in the salaries of its executives and other highly compensated employees;
WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of the Employment Agreement, a failure to pay or cause to be paid Executive’s Base Salary when due constitutes “Good Reason” under clause (A) of that term as defined in the Employment Agreement unless the Executive’s consent is obtained; and
WHEREAS, Executive is willing to consent to a temporary reduction in Executive’s Base Salary solely as part of the response to the Market Conditions and not for any other purposes under the Employment Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED that, effective as of April 1, 2020 (the “Effective Date”), in connection with the Market Conditions, Executive hereby consents to a temporary 50% reduction in the biweekly installments of Executive’s Base Salary to be paid by the Company from the Effective Date; provided that such reduction in the biweekly installments shall not reduce Executive’s current annual Base Salary of $537,500 for any purpose under the Employment Agreement.
																		
	ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:					
						
	EXECUTIVE					
						
	/s/ Thomas O'Connor				3/26/2020	
	Name:	Thomas O'Conner			Date	
	Title:	Senior Vice President, Commercial				
						
	COMPANY					
						
	/s/ Thomas Nimbley				3/26/2020	
	Name:	Thomas Nimbley			Date	
	Title:	Chief Executive Officer