SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549
 
  FORM 10-Q
  [X]
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2009,
  OR
  [  ]
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO .
  Commission file number 1-14120
  BLONDER TONGUE LABORATORIES, INC.
 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
 Delaware

52-1611421(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)One Jake Brown Road, Old Bridge, New Jersey

08857(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)
 Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (732) 679-4000
  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days.
  Yes X  No
 
 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files).
 
 Yes   No ___
  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See definition of “accelerated filer,” “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
  Large accelerated filer                                                                                       Accelerated
filer
  Non-accelerated filer                                                                                        Smaller
reporting company X
 (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
  Yes   No X
  Number of shares of common stock, par value $.001, outstanding as of August 6, 2009: 6,190,554
 
 The Exhibit Index appears on page 21.
 
 
 
 PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
  ITEM 1.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
  BLONDER TONGUE LABORATORIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
 (In thousands)
  
 (unaudited)June 30,
December 31,2009


2008Assets (Note 5)Current assets:Cash

$
778


$
2,469Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $265 and $304, respectively


2,891



3,787Inventories (Note 4)


9,996



8,976Prepaid and other current assets


481



372Deferred income taxes


436



436Total current assets


14,582



16,040Inventories, net non-current (Note 4)


4,424



4,392Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated
depreciation and amortization


4,109



4,176License agreements, net


262



155Other assets, net


299



359Deferred income taxes


1,920



1,920$
25,596


$
27,042Liabilities and Stockholders’ EquityCurrent liabilities:Current portion of long-term debt (Note 5)

$
233


$
237Accounts payable


868



1,744Accrued compensation


783



681Accrued benefit liability


714



714Income taxes payable


49



49Other accrued expenses


171



402Total current liabilities


2,818



3,827Long-term debt (Note 5)


3,179



3,779Commitments and contingencies


-



-Stockholders’ equity:Preferred stock, $.001 par value; authorized 5,000 shares;
No shares outstanding


-



-Common stock, $.001 par value; authorized 25,000 shares, 8,465 shares
Issued


8



8Paid-in capital


25,285



25,188Retained earnings


3,402



3,336Accumulated other comprehensive loss


(1,757
)


(1,757
)Treasury stock, at cost, 2,273 shares


(7,339
)


(7,339
)Total stockholders’ equity


19,599



19,436$
25,596


$
27,042
 See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
   2
  BLONDER TONGUE LABORATORIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
  CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
 (In thousands, except per share amounts)
 (unaudited)
 
 Three Months Ended June 30,


Six Months Ended June 30,2009


2008


2009


2008Net sales

$
6,257


$
8,562


$
15,190


$
15,446Cost of goods sold


4,052



5,721



9,331



10,145Gross profit


2,205



2,841



5,859



5,301Operating expenses:Selling


1,039



1,125



2,151



2,189General and administrative


895



1,285



2,421



2,570Research and development


627



456



1,212



9722,561



2,866



5,784



5,731Earnings (loss) from operations


(356
)


(25
)


75



(430
)Other Expense:   Interest expense (net)


(40
)


(139
)


(78
)


(250
)Loss from continuing operations before income taxes


(396
)


(164
)


(3
)


(680
)Provision (benefit) for income
taxes


-



-



-



-Loss from continuing operations


(396
)


(164
)


(3
)


(680
)Discontinued operations: (Note 6)Earnings (loss) from discontinued
operations (net of tax)


3



-



7



(24
)Gain (loss) on disposal of  Assets of
Subsidiary


-



118



62



(286
)Total discontinued operations


3



118



69



(310
)Net earnings (loss)

$
(393
)

$
(46
)

$
66


$
(990
)Basic and diluted loss per share from
continuing operations

$
(0.06
)

$
(0.03
)

$
-


$
(0.11
)Basic and diluted loss per share from
discontinued operations


-



-



-



-Basic and diluted gain (loss) per share on
disposal of assets of subsidiary


-


$
0.02


$
0.01


$
(0.05
)-


$
0.02


$
0.01


$
(0.05
)Basic and diluted net earnings (loss) per
share

$
(0.06
)

$
(0.01
)

$
0.01


$
(0.16
)Basic and diluted weighted average shares
outstanding


6,191



6,222



6,191



6,222
 
 
 
 See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
 
 
 
 3
 
 BLONDER TONGUE LABORATORIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
  CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
 (In thousands)
 (unaudited)
 
 
 Six Months Ended June 30,2009


2008Cash Flows From Operating Activities:Net earnings (loss)

$
66


$
(990
)Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to cash
used in operating activities:Stock compensation expense


97



165Write-down of  Hybrid’s property and equipment


-



286Gain on disposal of assets of subsidiary


(62
)


-Depreciation


210



204Amortization


87



16Allowance for doubtful accounts


20



(29
)Provision for inventory reserves


349



(2,744
)Changes in operating assets and liabilities:Accounts receivable


876



(496
)Inventories


(1,401
)


2,714Prepaid and other current assets


(109
)


(89
)Other assets


(90
)


122Accounts payable, accrued compensation and other accrued expenses


(1,005
)


284Net cash used in operating activities


(962
)


(557
)Cash Flows From Investing Activities:Capital expenditures


(143
)


(103
)Proceeds from sale of subsidiary


62



41Acquisition of licenses


(44
)


-Net cash used in investing activities


(125
)


(62
)Cash Flows From Financing Activities:Borrowings of debt


17



15,785Repayments of debt


(621
)


(15,343
)Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities


(604
)


442Net decrease in cash


(1,691
)


(177
)Cash, beginning of period


2,469



270Cash, end of period

$
778


$
93Supplemental Cash Flow Information:Cash paid for interest

$
96


$
244Cash paid for income taxes

$
-


$
-
 
 
 
 See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
  
 4
 BLONDER TONGUE LABORATORIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands)
(unaudited)
 
 Note 1 - Company and Basis of Presentation
  Blonder Tongue Laboratories, Inc. (the “Company”) is a technology-development and manufacturing company that delivers encoding, digital transport, and broadband product solutions to the cable markets the Company serves, including the multi-dwelling unit market, the lodging/hospitality market and the institutional market including,
hospitals, prisons and schools, primarily throughout the United States.  The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Blonder Tongue Laboratories, Inc. and subsidiaries.  Significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
  The results for the second quarter of 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full fiscal year and have not been audited.  In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting primarily of normal recurring accruals, necessary
for a fair statement of the results of operations for the period presented and the consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2009.  Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the SEC rules and regulations.  These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto that were included in the Company’s
latest annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
  Note 2- Earnings (loss) Per Share
  Earnings (loss) per share are calculated in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) No. 128, “Earnings Per Share,” which provides for the calculation of “basic” and “diluted” earnings (loss) per share.  Basic
earnings (loss) per share includes no dilution and is computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period.  Diluted earnings (loss) per share reflect, in periods in which they have a dilutive effect, the effect of common shares issuable upon exercise of stock options.  The diluted share base excludes incremental shares of 1,601 and 1,580 related to stock options for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. 
These shares were excluded due to their antidilutive effect.
  Note 3 – New Accounting Pronouncements
  In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement No. 166, “Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets — an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140” to improve the reporting for the transfer of financial assets resulting
from (1) practices that have developed since the issuance of FASB Statement No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities,” that are not consistent with the original intent and key requirements of that Statement and (2) concerns of financial statement users that many of the financial assets (and related obligations) that have been derecognized should continue to be reported in the financial statements of transferors. This Statement
must be applied as of the beginning of each reporting entity’s first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Earlier application is prohibited. The Company will review the requirements of FASB No. 166 and comply with its requirements. The Company does not expect that the adoption of this Statement will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated
financial statements.
  In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 167, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)” to amend certain requirements of FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” to improve financial
reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest entities and to provide more relevant and reliable information to users of financial statements. The Statement is effective as of the beginning of each reporting entity’s first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period, and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Earlier application is prohibited. The Company will review the requirements of FASB No. 167
and comply with its requirements. The Company does not expect that the adoption of this Statement will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
  In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards CodificationTM and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles—a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162.” Under the
 
 
 5
 
 BLONDER TONGUE LABORATORIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands)
(unaudited)
   Statement, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Codification) will become the source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. On the effective date of this Statement, the Codification will supersede all then-existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All other non-grandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become non-authoritative. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15,
2009. In the FASB’s view, the issuance of this Statement and the Codification will not change GAAP, except for those nonpublic nongovernmental entities that must now apply the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Technical Inquiry Service Section 5100, “Revenue Recognition,” paragraphs 38–76. The Company does not expect that the adoption of this Statement will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
  In May 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 165, “Subsequent Events,” which establishes general standards of and accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued.
This FASB was effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company has complied with the requirements of FASB 165.
  In April 2009, FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments” (FSP 115-2 and 124-2).  FSP 115-2 and 124-2 amends the guidance on other-than-temporary impairment for debt securities and
modifies the presentation and disclosure of other-than-temporary impairments on debt and equity securities in the financial statements.  This FSP is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009.  The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
  In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly” (FSP 157-4).  FSP 157-4 provides
additional guidance for estimating fair value under Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” when there is an inactive market or the market is not orderly.  This FSP is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
  In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” (FSP 107-1 and 28-1).  This FSP requires disclosure about fair value of financial instruments in interim periods, as well as
annual financial statements.  FSP 107-1 and 28-1 is effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009. The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
  In December 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 132(R)-1, “Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets” (FSP 132(R)-1).  FSP 132(R)-1 provides guidance on a plan sponsor’s disclosures about plan assets of defined benefit
pension and postretirement plans.  Required disclosures include information about categories of plan assets, fair value measurements of plan assets, and significant concentrations of risk, as well as investment policies and strategies.  FSP 132(R)-1 is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009.  Except for additional disclosures, the Company does not expect the adoption of FSP132(R)-1 to have an impact on its financial statements
 
 In June 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) FSP EITF 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities”.  This FSP addresses whether
instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need to be included in the earnings allocation in computing earnings per share (EPS) under the two-class method described in paragraphs 60 and 61 of FASB Statement No. 128, “Earnings per Share.” FSP EITF 03-6-1 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008, and interim periods within those years.  The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
   6
  BLONDER TONGUE LABORATORIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 (In thousands)
 (unaudited)
   In June 2008, the FASB ratified the consensus reached by the EITF on three issues discussed at its June 12, 2008 meeting pertaining to EITF 07-5, “Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) is Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock” (“EITF 07-5”).
The issues include how an entity should evaluate whether an instrument, or embedded feature, is indexed to its own stock, how the currency in which the strike price of an equity-linked financial instrument, or embedded equity-linked feature, is denominated affects the determination of whether the instrument is indexed to an entity’s own stock and how the issuer should account for market-based employee stock option valuation instruments. EITF 07-5 is effective for financial instruments issued for fiscal
years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2008 and is applicable to outstanding instruments as of the beginning of the fiscal year it is initially applied. The cumulative effect, if any, of the change in accounting principle shall be recognized as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
  In May 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. APB 14-1, “Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement).”  This FSP clarifies that convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion (including partial cash settlement)
are not addressed by paragraph 12 of APB Opinion No. 14, “Accounting for Convertible Debt and Debt Issued with Stock Purchase Warrants.” Additionally, this FSP specifies that issuers of such instruments should separately account for the liability and equity components in a manner that will reflect the entity’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when interest cost is recognized in subsequent periods. This FSP is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
  In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 161 “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities – an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (“SFAS 161”). SFAS 161 changes the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities.  Entities
are required to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. The guidance in SFAS 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008,
with early application encouraged. This Statement encourages, but does not require, comparative disclosures for earlier periods at initial adoption. The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
  In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 160, “Noncontrolling interests in Consolidated Financial Statements - An Amendment of ARB No, 51.” SFAS No. 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary (previously referred to as minority interests).  SFAS No. 160
also requires that a retained noncontrolling interest upon the deconsolidation of a subsidiary be initially measured at its fair value.  Upon adoption of SFAS No. 160, the Company would be required to report any noncontrolling interests as a separate component of consolidated stockholders’ equity.  The Company would also be required to present any net income allocable to noncontrolling interests and net income attributable to the stockholders of the Company separately in its consolidated
statements of operations.  SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years, and interim period within those fiscal years, beginning on or after January 1, 2009.  SFAS No. 160 requires retroactive adoption of the presentation and disclosure requirements for existing minority interests.  All other requirements of SFAS No. 160 shall be applied prospectively.  SFAS No. 160 would have an impact on the presentation and disclosure of the noncontrolling interests of any non wholly-owned
business acquired in the future.
  In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141R, “Business Combinations” which replaces SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations.” SFAS 141R establishes principles and requirements for determining how an enterprise recognizes and measures the fair value of certain assets and liabilities acquired in a business
combination, including noncontrolling interests, contingent consideration, and certain acquired contingencies. SFAS 141R also requires acquisition-related transaction expenses and restructuring costs be expensed as incurred rather than capitalized as a component of the business combination. SFAS 141R will be applicable prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15,
 
 
 7
 
 BLONDER TONGUE LABORATORIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands)
(unaudited)











2008. SFAS 141R would have an impact on accounting for any businesses acquired after the effective date of this pronouncement.




In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” SFAS No. 157 establishes a single definition of fair value and a framework for measuring fair value, sets out a fair value hierarchy to be used to classify the source of information
used in fair value measurements, and requires new disclosures of assets and liabilities measured at fair value based on their level in the hierarchy. This statement applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. In February 2008, the FASB issued Staff Positions (FSPs) No. 157-1 and No. 157-2, which, respectively, remove leasing transactions from the scope of SFAS No. 157 and defer its effective date for one year relative to certain nonfinancial
assets and liabilities. As a result, the application of the definition of fair value and related disclosures of SFAS No. 157 (as impacted by these two FSPs) was effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2008 on a prospective basis with respect to fair value measurements of (a) nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the Company’s financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually) and (b) all financial assets and liabilities.
This adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition. The remaining aspects of SFAS No. 157 for which the effective date was deferred under FSP No. 157-2 are currently being evaluated by the Company. Areas impacted by the deferral relate to nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value, but are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. This deferral applies to such items as nonfinancial
assets and liabilities initially measured at fair value in a business combination (but not measured at fair value in subsequent periods) or nonfinancial long-lived asset groups measured at fair value for an impairment assessment. The effects of these remaining aspects of SFAS No. 157 are to be applied to fair value measurements prospectively beginning January 1, 2009. The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial
condition.




The FASB, the Emerging Issues Task Force and the SEC have issued certain other accounting pronouncements and regulations that will become effective in subsequent periods and are not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements at the time
they become effective.




Note 4 – Inventories




Inventories net of reserves are summarized as follows:


(unaudited)
June 30,
2009


Dec. 31,
2008Raw Materials

$
7,626


$
6,854Work in process


1,693



3,116Finished Goods


7,921



6,44517,240



16,415Less current inventory


(9,996
)


(8,976
)7,244



7,439Less Reserve primarily for excess inventory


(2,820
)


(3,047
)$
4,424


$
4,392





Inventories are stated at the lower of cost, determined by the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method, or market.




The Company periodically analyzes anticipated product sales based on historical results, current backlog and marketing plans.  Based on these analyses, the Company anticipates that certain products will not be sold during the next twelve months.  Inventories that are not anticipated to be sold in the next twelve months,
have been classified as non-current.




Approximately 53% and 58% of the non-current inventories were comprised of finished goods at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.  The Company has established a program to use interchangeable parts in its various








8





BLONDER TONGUE LABORATORIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 (In thousands)
 (unaudited)






product offerings and to modify certain of its finished goods to better match customer demands.  In addition, the Company has instituted additional marketing programs to dispose of the slower moving inventories.




The Company continually analyzes its slow-moving, excess and obsolete inventories.  Based on historical and projected sales volumes and anticipated selling prices, the Company establishes reserves.  Products that are determined to be obsolete are written down to net realizable value.  If the Company does not
meet its sales expectations, these reserves are increased.  The Company believes reserves are adequate and inventories are reflected at net realizable value.




Note 5 – Debt




On August 6, 2008, the Company entered into a Revolving Credit, Term Loan and Security Agreement with Sovereign Business Capital (“Sovereign”), a division of Sovereign Bank (“Sovereign Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company obtained an $8,000 credit facility from Sovereign (the “Sovereign Financing”).  The
Sovereign Financing consists of (i) a $4,000 asset based revolving credit facility (“Revolver”) and (ii) a $4,000 term loan facility (“Term Loan”), each of which has a three year term.  The amounts which may be borrowed under the Revolver are based on certain percentages of Eligible Receivables and Eligible Inventory, as such terms are defined in the Sovereign Agreement.  The obligations of the Company under the Sovereign Agreement are secured by substantially all of
the assets of the Company.




Under the Sovereign Agreement, the Revolver bears interest at a rate per annum equal to the prime lending rate announced from time to time by Sovereign (“Prime”) plus 0.25%.  The Term Loan bears interest at a rate per annum equal to Prime plus 0.50%.  Prime was 3.25% on June 30, 2009.




The Revolver terminates on August 5, 2011, at which time all outstanding borrowings under the Revolver are due.  The Term Loan matures on August 5, 2011 and requires equal monthly principal payments of approximately $17 each, plus interest, with the remaining balance due at maturity.  The loans are subject to a prepayment
penalty if satisfied in full prior to the second anniversary of the effective date of the loans.  During the first quarter ended March 31, 2009, the Company made an elective $500 additional Term Loan payment.




The Sovereign Agreement contains customary representations and warranties as well as affirmative and negative covenants, including certain financial covenants.  The Sovereign Agreement contains customary events of default, including, among others, non-payment of principal, interest or other amounts when due.




Proceeds from the Term Loan were used to refinance the Company’s credit facility with National City Business Credit, Inc. and National City Bank, to pay transaction costs, to provide working capital and for other general corporate purposes.  As of June 30, 2009, the Company has not drawn any funds under the Revolver.




Note 6 – Discontinued Operations




The accompanying financial statements for all periods presented have been presented to reflect the accounting of discontinued operations for the disposal of certain subsidiaries during the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.




The Company classifies disposal of subsidiary in discontinued operations when the operations and cash flows of the subsidiary have been eliminated from ongoing operations and when the Company will not have any significant continuing involvement in the operation of the subsidiary after disposal.  For purposes of reporting the
operations of the subsidiary meeting the criteria of discontinued operations, the Company reports net revenue, gross profit and related selling, general and administrative expenses that are specifically identifiable to the subsidiary as discontinued operations.




On December 15, 2006, the Company and its former subsidiary BDR Broadband, LLC (“BDR”) entered into a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (“Purchase Agreement”) with DirecPath Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“DirecPath”), pursuant to which and on such date, the Company sold all
of the issued and outstanding membership interests of BDR to DirecPath.




Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, DirecPath paid the Company an aggregate purchase price of $3,130 in cash, resulting in a gain of approximately $880 on the sale, after certain post-closing adjustments, including an adjustment for











9


BLONDER TONGUE LABORATORIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands)
(unaudited)





cash, an adjustment for working capital and adjustments related to the number of subscribers for certain types of services, all as of the closing date and as set forth in the Purchase Agreement. A portion of the purchase price in the amount of $37, was held in an escrow account, and was included as part of the prepaid and other current
assets as of December 31, 2008, pursuant to an Escrow Agreement dated December 15, 2006, among the Company, DirecPath and U.S. Bank National Association, to secure the Company’s indemnification obligations under the Purchase Agreement.  During January 2009, all remaining amounts in the escrow account were released back to the Company and all indemnification obligations were satisfied.  Accordingly, the Company recognized an additional gain of approximately $62 on the sale.




In addition, in connection with the divestiture transaction, on December 15, 2006, the Company entered into a Purchase and Supply Agreement with DirecPath, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of DirecPath (“DPLLC”), pursuant to which DPLLC is contractually obligated to purchase $1,630 of products from the Company, subject to certain
adjustments, over a period of three (3) years.  DPLLC purchased $5, $64 and $404 of equipment from the Company in 2009 (through the end of the second quarter), 2008 and 2007, respectively.




The period in which DPLLC is required to satisfy the purchase commitment may be extended upon the occurrence of certain events, including if the Company is unable to deliver the products required by DPLLC.  The Purchase Agreement includes customary representations and warranties and post-closing covenants, including indemnification
obligations, subject to certain limitations, on behalf of the parties with respect to their representations, warranties and agreements made pursuant to the Purchase Agreement.  In addition, except for certain activities by Hybrid Networks, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, the Company agreed, for a period of two (2) years, not to engage in any business that competes with BDR.




As part of the Company’s on-going implementation of its strategic plan and evaluation of non-core business activities, the Company made the decision in 2008 to cease the operations of its wholly-owned subsidiary, Hybrid Networks, LLC (“Hybrid”), and liquidate its assets.  Hybrid’s business activities consisted
of the operation of video, high-speed data and/or telephony systems (“Systems”) at four multi-dwelling unit communities under certain right-of-entry agreements (“ROE Agreements”).  Based on this decision, the Company recognized an initial net loss on disposal of approximately $405, which was subsequently adjusted to $286, related to the Hybrid fixed assets, which includes the ROE Agreements and the equipment necessary to operate the Systems, substantially all of which is installed
at the applicable property locations.  While the Company has wound down almost all of the operations of Hybrid, it continues to perform certain basic administrative services which provide an immaterial amount of positive cash flow and are not expected to have a negative effect on net income.




As a result of the above, the Company reflected the disposal of Hybrid and the results of its operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, as a discontinued operation.  Components of the income (loss) from discontinued operations are as follows:





Three Months Ended
June 30,


Six Months Ended
June 30,2009


2008


2009


2008Net sales

$
24


$
31


$
48


$
58Cost of goods sold


20



16



40



39Gross profit


4



15



8



19General and administrative


1



15



1



43Net income (loss)

$
3


$
-


$
7


$
(24
)









10


BLONDER TONGUE LABORATORIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 (In thousands)
 (unaudited)


Note 7 – Related Party Transactions




As of June 30, 2009 the Chief Executive Officer was indebted to the Company in the amount of $141, for which no interest has been charged.  This indebtedness arose from a series of cash advances, the latest of which was advanced in February 2002 and is included in other assets at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.  No
payments on this indebtedness have been made since November 2008 when the Chief Executive Officer filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code and the indebtedness became subject to the automatic stay provisions of the United States Bankruptcy Code.  On July 29, 2009 a plan of reorganization in connection with the Chief Executive Officer's bankruptcy case was confirmed by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey.  Under the confirmed
plan of reorganization, the Chief Executive Officer will be obligated to pay a distribution toward repayment of his pre-petition obligation to the Company pro rata with all of his other pre-petition debts in sixty (60) equal consecutive monthly installments, with payments to commence as soon as practicable under the terms of the confirmed plan.  The actual amount that the Company may expect to receive pursuant to the confirmed plan and the date on which payments would commence are not
presently determinable.




In December 2007, the Company entered into an agreement to provide manufacturing, research and development and product support to Buffalo City Center Leasing, LLC (“Buffalo City”) for an electronic on-board recorder that Buffalo City is producing for Turnpike Global Technologies, LLC.  The three-year agreement is
anticipated to provide up to $4,000 in revenue to the Company.  The Company received $249 and $174 in revenue from Buffalo City in the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively and $442 and $725 in the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.  In addition, the Company’s accounts receivable included $1,061 and $929 due from Buffalo City at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.  Through June 30, 2009, the Company has received $1,892 in
cumulative revenue under the agreement.  A director of the Company is also the managing member and a vice president of Buffalo City and may be deemed to control the entity which owns fifty percent (50%) of the membership interests of Buffalo City.




Note 8 – Income Taxes




The current provision for income taxes for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was zero.  A valuation allowance was recorded for the benefit of the 2008 tax loss and the 2009 impact was not material.




11


ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS




Forward-Looking Statements




In addition to historical information, this Quarterly Report contains forward-looking statements relating to such matters as anticipated financial performance, business prospects, technological developments, new products, research and development activities and similar matters.  The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements. In order to comply with the terms of the safe harbor, the Company notes that a variety of factors could cause the Company’s actual results and experience to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in the Company’s forward-looking statements.  The risks and uncertainties that may affect the operation, performance, development and results of the Company’s business include, but are not limited
to, those matters discussed herein in the section entitled Item 2 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.  The words “believe”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “project” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements.  Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect management’s analysis only as of the date hereof.  The
Company undertakes no obligation to publicly revise these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date hereof.  Readers should carefully review the risk factors described in other documents the Company files from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including without limitation, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (See Item 1 – Business; Item 1A – Risk Factors; Item 3 – Legal
Proceedings and Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations).




General




The Company was incorporated in November, 1988, under the laws of Delaware as GPS Acquisition Corp. for the purpose of acquiring the business of Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc., a New Jersey corporation which was founded in 1950 by Ben H. Tongue and Isaac S. Blonder to design, manufacture and supply a line of electronics and systems
equipment principally for the private cable industry.  Following the acquisition, the Company changed its name to Blonder Tongue Laboratories, Inc.  The Company completed the initial public offering of its shares of Common Stock in December, 1995.




Today the Company is a technology-development and manufacturing company that delivers encoding, digital transport, and broadband product solutions to the cable markets the Company serves, including the multi-dwelling unit market, the lodging/hospitality market and the institutional market, including, hospitals, prisons and schools, primarily
throughout the United States.  The technology requirements of these markets change rapidly and the Company is continually developing and adding new products.  Recently, the Company has focused on the development of products for digital signal generation and transmission and, during 2008, the Company entered into various agreements for technologies in concert with its new digital encoder line of products.  As a result, the Company has significantly expanded its digital product line.  The
evolution of the Company’s product lines will focus on the increased needs created in the digital space by IPTV, digital video and HDTV signals and the transport of these signals over state of the art broadband networks.




In 2008 the Company also took advantage of the FCC’s mandated transition to digital broadcasts which requires that all analog broadcasts are to cease in 2009.  The original date for such termination was February 17, 2009, however this date was extended to June 12, 2009.  In connection with this transition, the
Company heavily marketed its digital products to its customer base and, in addition to trade shows, the Company offered “Back to School” classes on making the transition to digital.




The Company’s product lines continue to include equipment and innovative solutions for the high-speed transmission of data and the provision of telephony services in multiple dwelling unit applications.  The Company’s products are used to acquire, distribute and protect the broad range of communications signals carried
on fiber optic, twisted pair, coaxial cable and wireless distribution systems.  These products are sold to customers providing an array of communications services, including television, high-speed data (Internet) and telephony, to single family dwellings, multiple dwelling units (“MDUs”), the lodging industry and institutions such as hospitals, prisons, schools and marinas.  The Company’s principal customers are cable system operators (both franchise and private cable), as
well as contractors that design, package, install and in most instances operate, upgrade and maintain the systems they build, including institutional and lodging/hospitality operators.




A key component of the Company’s strategy is to leverage its reputation across a broad product line, offering one-stop shop convenience to cable, broadcast, and professional markets and delivering products having a high performance-to-cost ratio.  The Company continues to expand its core product lines, including digital
and analog products (headend and








12





distribution), to maintain its ability to provide all of the electronic equipment necessary to build small cable systems and much of the equipment needed in larger systems for the most efficient operation and highest profitability in high density applications.  The Company has also divested its interests in certain non-core
businesses as part of its strategy to focus on the efficient operation of its core businesses.




In 2007, the Company commenced an initiative to manufacture products in the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”) in order to reduce the Company’s manufacturing costs and allow a more aggressive marketing program in the private cable market.  The Company’s manufacturing initiative in the PRC entails
a combination of contract manufacturing agreements and purchasing agreements with key PRC manufacturers that can most fully meet the Company’s needs.  In early 2007, the Company entered into a manufacturing agreement with a key contract manufacturer in the PRC that governs its production of certain of the Company’s products upon the receipt of purchase orders from the Company.  The first products were produced in the PRC during the fourth quarter of 2007.  In 2008, the
Company’s PRC initiative continued with the transfer of manufacturing for certain high volume, labor intensive products to the PRC, including many of the Company’s analog products.  The Company’s expects that proprietary products and those requiring less labor will continue to be manufactured at the New Jersey facility, including most of the Company’s digital products.  The Company expects this ongoing transition will continue to be implemented in phases over the next
several years with the goal that it will ultimately relate to products representing a significant portion (but less than a majority) of the Company’s net sales.




In December 2007, the Company entered into an agreement to provide manufacturing, research and development and product support to Buffalo City Center Leasing, LLC (“Buffalo City”) for an electronic on-board recorder that Buffalo City is producing for Turnpike Global Technologies, LLC.  The three-year agreement is
anticipated to provide up to $4,000,000 in revenue to the Company.  The Company received $249,000 and $174,000 in revenue from Buffalo City in the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $442,000 and $725,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.    Through June 30, 2009, the Company has received $1,892,000 in cumulative revenue under the agreement.  A director of the Company is also the managing member and a vice president of
Buffalo City and may be deemed to control the entity which owns fifty percent (50%) of the membership interests of Buffalo City.




As part of the Company’s on-going implementation of its strategic plan and evaluation of non-core business activities, the Company made the decision in April 2008 to cease the operations of its wholly-owned subsidiary, Hybrid Networks, LLC (“Hybrid”), and liquidate its assets.  Hybrid’s business activities
consisted of the operation of video, high-speed data and/or telephony systems (“Systems”) at four multi-dwelling unit communities under certain right-of-entry agreements (“ROE Agreements”).  The results of operations of Hybrid are reflected as discontinued operations in the consolidated statement of operations included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.




Based on this decision, in 2008 the Company recognized an initial net loss on disposal of approximately $405,000, which was subsequently adjusted to $286,000, related to the Hybrid fixed assets, which includes the ROE Agreements and the equipment necessary to operate the Systems, substantially all of which is installed at the applicable
property locations.  While the Company has wound down almost all of the operations of Hybrid, it continues to perform certain basic administrative services which provide an immaterial amount of positive cash flow and are not expected to have a negative effect on  net income.




The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) mandated that all analog broadcasts were to cease by February 17, 2009; however, this date was extended to June 12, 2009.  In anticipation of this analog shut down, the FCC also granted second licenses to all broadcasters to begin simulcasting digital signals.  As a result,
the Company expects to see a continuing shift in product mix from analog products to digital products.  Accordingly, any substantial decrease in sales of analog products without a related increase in digital products could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.




Results of Operations




Second three months of 2009 Compared with second three months of 2008




Net Sales.  Net sales decreased $2,305,000, or 26.9%, to $6,257,000 in the second three months of 2009 from $8,562,000 in the second three months of 2008.  The decrease in sales is primarily attributed to a decrease in analog headend and digital products.  Analog
headend products were $2,671,000 and $3,219,000 and digital products were $1,208,000 and $2,969,000 in the second three months of 2009 and 2008, respectively.




Cost of Goods Sold.Cost of goods sold decreased to $4,052,000 for the second three months of 2009 from $5,721,000 for the second three months of 2008 and decreased as a percentage of sales to 64.8% from 66.8%.  The decrease








13





was primarily due to decreased sales. The decrease as percentage of sales was primarily attributed to a more favorable product mix.




Selling Expenses.  Selling expenses decreased to $1,039,000 for the second three months of 2009 from $1,125,000 in the second three months of 2008 but increased as a percentage of sales to 16.6% for the second three months of 2009 from 13.1% for the second three months
of 2008.  The $86,000 decrease was primarily the result of a decrease in royalties of $25,000, a decrease in consulting fees of $24,000 and a decrease in freight expense of $19,000.




General and Administrative Expenses.  General and administrative expenses decreased to $895,000 for the second three months of 2009 from $1,285,000 for the second three months of 2008 and decreased as a percentage of sales to 14.3% for the second three months of 2009 from
15.0% for the second three months of 2008.  The $390,000 decrease was primarily the result of a decrease in salaries of $269,000 due to a reversal of accrued executive bonuses of $264,000 for 2009 and a decrease in miscellaneous taxes of $41,000.




Research and Development Expenses.  Research and development expenses increased to $627,000 in the second three months of 2009 from $456,000 in the second three months of 2008 and increased as a percentage of sales to 10.0% for the second three months of 2009 from 5.3%
for the second three months of 2008. This $171,000 increase is primarily the result of an increase in salaries and fringe benefits of $85,000 due to an increase in headcount, an increase in amortization of license fees of $44,000 and an increase in consulting fees of $19,000.




Operating  Loss.  Operating loss of $356,000 for the second three months of 2009 represents an increase from the operating loss of $25,000 for the second three months of 2008.  Operating loss as a percentage of sales was 5.7 % in the second three months
of 2009 compared to 0.3 % in the second three months of 2008.




Other Expense.  Interest expense decreased to $40,000 in the second three months of 2009 from $139,000 in the second three months of 2008.  The decrease is the result of lower average borrowing and lower cost of funds.




Income Taxes. The current provision for income taxes for the second three months of 2009 and 2008 was zero.  A valuation allowance was recorded for the benefit of the 2008 tax loss and the 2009 impact was not material.






First six months of 2009 Compared with first six months of 2008




Net Sales.  Net sales decreased $256,000, or 1.7%, to $15,190,000 in the first six months of 2009 from $15,446,000 in the first six months of 2008.  The decrease in sales is primarily attributed to a decrease in digital products, contract manufactured products
and fiber products, offset by an increase in analog headend products and reception products.  Digital products were $3,552,000 and $3,932,000, contract manufactured products were $442,000 and $725,000, fiber products were $371,000 and $635,000, analog headend products were $6,791,000 and $6,330,000 and reception products were $589,000 and $277,000 in the first six months of 2009 and 2008, respectively.




Cost of Goods Sold.Cost of goods sold decreased to $9,331,000 for the first six months of 2009 from $10,145,000 for the first six months of 2008 and decreased as a percentage of sales to 61.4% from 65.7%.   The decrease was primarily attributed to a more favorable
product mix.




Selling Expenses.  Selling expenses decreased to $2,151,000 for the first six months of 2009 from $2,189,000 in the first six months of 2008 and remained constant as a percentage of sales of 14.2% for the first six months of 2009 and 2008.  The $38,000 decrease
was primarily the result of a decrease in consulting fees of $55,000.




General and Administrative Expenses.  General and administrative expenses decreased to $2,421,000 for the first six months of 2009 from $2,570,000 for the first six months of 2008 and decreased as a percentage of sales to 15.9% for the first six months of 2009 from 16.6%
for the first six months of 2008.  The $149,000 decrease was primarily the result of a reduction of professional fees of $92,000 and a reduction in miscellaneous taxes of $27,000.




Research and Development Expenses.  Research and development expenses increased to $1,212,000 in the first six months of 2009 from $972,000 in the first six months of 2008 and increased as a percentage of sales to 8.0% for the first six months of 2009 from 6.3% for the
first six months of 2008. This $240,000 increase is primarily the result of an increase in salaries and fringe benefits of $114,000 due to an increase in headcount and an increase in amortization of license fees of $71,000.




Operating Income (Loss).  Operating income of $75,000 for the first six months of 2009 represents an improvement from an operating loss of $(430,000) for the first six months of 2008.  Operating income as a percentage of sales improved to 0.5% in the first six
months of 2009 from (2.8) % in the first six months of 2008.




Other Expense.  Interest expense decreased to $78,000 in the first six months of 2009 from $250,000 in the first six months of 2008.  The decrease is the result of lower average borrowing and lower cost of funds.




14




Income Taxes. The current provision for income taxes for the first six months of 2009 and 2008 was zero.  A valuation allowance was recorded for the benefit of the 2008 tax loss and the 2009 impact was not material.









Liquidity and Capital Resources




As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company’s working capital was $11,764,000 and $12,213,000, respectively.  The decrease in working capital is primarily due to an additional elective long term debt payment of $500,000 made during the six month period ended June 30, 2009.




The Company’s net cash used in operating activities for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009 was $962,000, compared to $557,000 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 primarily due to a decease in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $1,005,000 and a decrease in inventories of $1,401,000, which was partially offset
by a decrease in accounts receivable of $876,000.




Cash used in investing activities for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009 was $125,000, which was primarily attributable to an increase in capital expenditures of $143,000.




Cash used in financing activities was $604,000 for the first six months of 2009, which was primarily comprised of repayment of debt of $621,000.




On August 6, 2008, the Company entered into a Revolving Credit, Term Loan and Security Agreement with Sovereign Business Capital (“Sovereign”), a division of Sovereign Bank (“Sovereign Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company obtained an $8,000,000 credit facility from Sovereign (the “Sovereign Financing”).  The
Sovereign Financing consists of (i) a $4,000,000 asset-based revolving credit facility (“Revolver”) and (ii) a $4,000,000 term loan facility (“Term Loan”), each of which has a three-year term.  The amounts which may be borrowed under the Revolver are based on certain percentages of Eligible Receivables and Eligible Inventory, as such terms are defined in the Sovereign Agreement.  The obligations of the Company under the Sovereign Agreement are secured by substantially
all of the assets of the Company.




Under the Sovereign Agreement, the Revolver bears interest at a rate per annum equal to the prime lending rate announced from time to time by Sovereign (“Prime”) plus 0.25%.  The Term Loan bears interest at a rate per annum equal to Prime plus 0.50%.




The Revolver terminates on August 5, 2011, at which time all outstanding borrowings under the Revolver are due.  The Term Loan matures on August 5, 2011 and requires equal monthly principal payments of approximately $17,000 each, plus interest, with the remaining balance due at maturity.  The loans are subject to a
prepayment penalty if satisfied in full prior to the second anniversary of the effective date of the loans.  During the first quarter ended March 31, 2009, the Company made an elective $500,000 additional Term Loan payment.




The Sovereign Agreement contains customary representations and warranties as well as affirmative and negative covenants, including certain financial covenants.  The Sovereign Agreement contains customary events of default, including, among others, non-payment of principal, interest or other amounts when due.




Proceeds from the Term Loan were used to refinance the Company’s credit facility with National City Business Credit, Inc. and National City Bank, to pay transaction costs, to provide working capital and for other general corporate purposes.  As of June 30, 2009, the Company has not drawn any funds under the Revolver.




The Company anticipates that the cash generated from operations, existing cash balances and amounts available under its credit facility with Sovereign, will be sufficient to satisfy its foreseeable working capital needs.




New Accounting Pronouncements




In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement No. 166, “Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets — an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140” to improve the reporting for the transfer of financial assets resulting
from (1) practices that have developed since the issuance of FASB Statement No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities,” that are not consistent with the original intent and key requirements of that Statement and (2) concerns of financial statement users that many of








15





the financial assets (and related obligations) that have been derecognized should continue to be reported in the financial statements of transferors. This Statement must be applied as of the beginning of each reporting entity’s first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that
first annual reporting period and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Earlier application is prohibited. The Company will review the requirements of FASB No. 166 and comply with its requirements. The Company does not expect that the adoption of this Statement will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.




In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 167, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)” to amend certain requirements of FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” to improve financial
reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest entities and to provide more relevant and reliable information to users of financial statements. The Statement is effective as of the beginning of each reporting entity’s first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period, and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Earlier application is prohibited. The Company will review the requirements of FASB No. 167
and comply with its requirements. The Company does not expect that the adoption of this Statement will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.




In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards CodificationTM and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles—a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162.” Under the Statement, The
FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Codification) will become the source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. On the effective date of this Statement, the Codification will supersede all then-existing non-SEC accounting
and reporting standards. All other non-grandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become non-authoritative. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. In the FASB’s view, the issuance of this Statement and the Codification will not change GAAP, except for those nonpublic nongovernmental entities that must now apply the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Technical Inquiry
Service Section 5100, “Revenue Recognition,” paragraphs 38–76. The Company does not expect that the adoption of this Statement will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.




In May 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 165, “Subsequent Events,” which establishes general standards of and accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued.
This FASB was effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company has complied with the requirements of FASB 165.




In April 2009, FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments” (FSP 115-2 and 124-2).  FSP 115-2 and 124-2 amends the guidance on other-than-temporary impairment for debt securities and
modifies the presentation and disclosure of other-than-temporary impairments on debt and equity securities in the financial statements.  This FSP is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009.  The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition.




In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly” (FSP 157-4).  FSP 157-4 provides
additional guidance for estimating fair value under Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” when there is an inactive market or the market is not orderly.  This FSP is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition.




In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” (FSP 107-1 and 28-1).  This FSP requires disclosure about fair value of financial instruments in interim periods, as well as
annual financial statements.  FSP 107-1 and 28-1 is effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009. The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition.




In December 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 132(R)-1, “Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets” (FSP 132(R)-1).  FSP 132(R)-1 provides guidance on a plan sponsor’s disclosures about plan assets of defined benefit
pension and postretirement plans.  Required disclosures include information about








16





categories of plan assets, fair value measurements of plan assets, and significant concentrations of risk, as well as investment policies and strategies.  FSP 132(R)-1 is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009.  Except for additional disclosures, the Company does not expect the adoption of FSP132(R)-1
to have an impact on its financial statements





In June 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) FSP EITF 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities”.  This FSP addresses whether
instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need to be included in the earnings allocation in computing earnings per share (EPS) under the two-class method described in paragraphs 60 and 61 of FASB Statement No. 128, “Earnings per Share.” FSP EITF 03-6-1 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008, and interim periods within those years.  The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition.




In June 2008, the FASB ratified the consensus reached by the EITF on three issues discussed at its June 12, 2008 meeting pertaining to EITF 07-5, “Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) is Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock” (“EITF 07-5”).
The issues include how an entity should evaluate whether an instrument, or embedded feature, is indexed to its own stock, how the currency in which the strike price of an equity-linked financial instrument, or embedded equity-linked feature, is denominated affects the determination of whether the instrument is indexed to an entity’s own stock and how the issuer should account for market-based employee stock option valuation instruments. EITF 07-5 is effective for financial instruments issued for fiscal
years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2008 and is applicable to outstanding instruments as of the beginning of the fiscal year it is initially applied. The cumulative effect, if any, of the change in accounting principle shall be recognized as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition.




In May 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. APB 14-1, “Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement).”  This FSP clarifies that convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion (including partial cash settlement)
are not addressed by paragraph 12 of APB Opinion No. 14, “Accounting for Convertible Debt and Debt Issued with Stock Purchase Warrants.” Additionally, this FSP specifies that issuers of such instruments should separately account for the liability and equity components in a manner that will reflect the entity’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when interest cost is recognized in subsequent periods. This FSP is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition.




In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 161 “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities – an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (“SFAS 161”). SFAS 161 changes the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities.  Entities
are required to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. The guidance in SFAS 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008,
with early application encouraged. This Statement encourages, but does not require, comparative disclosures for earlier periods at initial adoption. The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition.




In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 160, “Noncontrolling interests in Consolidated Financial Statements - An Amendment of ARB No, 51.” SFAS No. 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary (previously referred to as minority interests).  SFAS No. 160
also requires that a retained noncontrolling interest upon the deconsolidation of a subsidiary be initially measured at its fair value.  Upon adoption of SFAS No. 160, the Company would be required to report any noncontrolling interests as a separate component of consolidated stockholders’ equity.  The Company would also be required to present any net income allocable to noncontrolling interests and net income attributable to the stockholders of the Company separately in its consolidated
statements of operations.  SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years, and interim period within those fiscal years, beginning on or after January 1, 2009.  SFAS No. 160 requires retroactive adoption of the presentation and disclosure requirements for existing minority interests.  All other requirements of SFAS No. 160 shall be applied prospectively.  SFAS No. 160








17





would have an impact on the presentation and disclosure of the noncontrolling interests of any non wholly-owned business acquired in the future.




In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141R, “Business Combinations” which replaces SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations.” SFAS 141R establishes principles and requirements for determining how an enterprise recognizes and measures the fair value of certain assets and liabilities acquired in a business
combination, including noncontrolling interests, contingent consideration, and certain acquired contingencies. SFAS 141R also requires acquisition-related transaction expenses and restructuring costs be expensed as incurred rather than capitalized as a component of the business combination. SFAS 141R will be applicable prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. SFAS 141R would
have an impact on accounting for any businesses acquired after the effective date of this pronouncement.




In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” SFAS No. 157 establishes a single definition of fair value and a framework for measuring fair value, sets out a fair value hierarchy to be used to classify the source of information
used in fair value measurements, and requires new disclosures of assets and liabilities measured at fair value based on their level in the hierarchy. This statement applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. In February 2008, the FASB issued Staff Positions (FSPs) No. 157-1 and No. 157-2, which, respectively, remove leasing transactions from the scope of SFAS No. 157 and defer its effective date for one year relative to certain nonfinancial
assets and liabilities. As a result, the application of the definition of fair value and related disclosures of SFAS No. 157 (as impacted by these two FSPs) was effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2008 on a prospective basis with respect to fair value measurements of (a) nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the Company’s financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually) and (b) all financial assets and liabilities.
This adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition. The remaining aspects of SFAS No. 157 for which the effective date was deferred under FSP No. 157-2 are currently being evaluated by the Company. Areas impacted by the deferral relate to nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value, but are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. This deferral applies to such items as nonfinancial
assets and liabilities initially measured at fair value in a business combination (but not measured at fair value in subsequent periods) or nonfinancial long-lived asset groups measured at fair value for an impairment assessment. The effects of these remaining aspects of SFAS No. 157 are to be applied to fair value measurements prospectively beginning January 1, 2009. The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial
condition.




The FASB, the Emerging Issues Task Force and the SEC have issued certain other accounting pronouncements and regulations that will become effective in subsequent periods and are not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements at the time they become effective






ITEM 3.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK





Not applicable to smaller reporting companies.





ITEM 4.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES




The Company maintains a system of disclosure controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports filed or submitted pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”),
is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission.   Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.  The Company
carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report.  Based on this evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective at June 30, 2009.






18




During the quarter ended June 30, 2009, there have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.









PART II - OTHER INFORMATION




ITEM 1.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS




The Company is a party to certain proceedings incidental to the ordinary course of its business, none of which, in the current opinion of management, is likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.




As of June 30, 2009, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer was indebted to the Company in the amount of $140,000, for which no interest has been charged.  This indebtedness arose from a series of cash advances made to the Chief Executive Officer, the latest of which was advanced in February, 2002.  This debt was
being repaid at the rate of $1,000 per month, all of which represented principal payments on the indebtedness, until November 2008 when the Chief Executive Officer and his spouse filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code.  Since the time of filing, payments on this indebtedness have been subject to the automatic stay provisions of the United States Bankruptcy Code and, accordingly, no additional payments have been made.  On July 29, 2009 a plan of reorganization
in connection with the Chief Executive Officer's bankruptcy case was confirmed by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey.  Under the confirmed plan of reorganization, the Chief Executive Officer will be obligated to pay a distribution toward repayment of his pre-petition obligation to the Company pro rata with all of his other pre-petition debts in sixty (60) equal consecutive monthly installments, with payments to commence as soon as practicable under the terms of the
confirmed plan.  The actual amount that the Company may expect to receive pursuant to the confirmed plan and the date on which payments would commence are not presently determinable.




ITEM 4.  SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS




The Company held its Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Meeting”) on May 20, 2009.  The Company solicited proxies in connection with the Meeting.  At the record date of the Meeting (March 31, 2009), there were 6,190,554  shares of the Company’s
common stock outstanding and entitled to vote.  The following were the matters voted upon at the Meeting:




1.           Election of Directors.  The following directors were elected at the Meeting:  Robert J. Pallé, Jr., and Gary P. Scharmett.  The number of votes cast for and withheld from each director are as follows:




DIRECTORS                                                      FOR                                WITHHELD


Robert J. Pallé, Jr.                                           5,594,151                                580,951


Gary P. Scharmett                                           5,594,601                                580,501








Anthony J. Bruno, Robert E. Heaton, James A. Luksch, Robert B. Mayer and James F. Williams, continued as directors after the meeting.




2.           Ratification of Auditors.  The appointment of Marcum LLP (formerly known as Marcum & Kliegman LLP) as the Company’s independent registered public accountants for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009 was ratified by the following vote of common stock:




FOR                                AGAINST                                           ABSTAIN


6,152,012                        21,130                                                   1,961









ITEM 6.  EXHIBITS




Exhibits The exhibits are listed in the Exhibit Index appearing at page 21 herein.




19





SIGNATURES




Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.







.
BLONDER TONGUE LABORATORIES, INC.Date:  August 6, 2009

By:
/s/  James A. LukschJames A. LukschChief Executive OfficerBy:
/s/  Eric SkolnikEric SkolnikSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)









20





EXHIBIT INDEX







Exhibit #
Description

Location3.1
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Blonder Tongue Laboratories, Inc.

Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to S-1 Registration Statement No. 33-98070 originally filed October 12, 1995, as amended.3.2
Restated Bylaws of Blonder Tongue Laboratories, Inc., as amended

Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.2 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A originally filed May 9, 2008.31.1
Certification of James A. Luksch pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Filed herewith.31.2
Certification of Eric Skolnik pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Filed herewith.32.1
Certification pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Filed herewith.