alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Dura Automotive Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
David L. Harbert, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.


/s/ David L. Harbert
-------------------------------------
David L. Harbert
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
July 16, 2007
. 

Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program 

Technical Work Group Meeting 

May 16, 2002 

Presiding: Kurt Dongoske, Chairman 

Committee Members Present:

Perri Benemelis, ADWR Robert King, UDWR 

Kerry Christensen, Hualapai Tribe Phillip S. Lehr, Colo. River Comm./NV 

Wayne Cook, UCRC Don Metz, USFWS 

Jonathan Damp, Pueblo of Zuni Bill Persons, AGFD 

William Davis, CREDA Randall Peterson, USBR 

Brenda Drye, So. Paiute Consortium D. Randolph Seaholm, CWCB 

Lloyd Greiner, UAMPS John Shields, WY State Engineer’s Office 

Norm Henderson, GLCA Robert Winfree, NPS/GRCA 

Amy Heuslein, BIA 

Committee Members Absent:

Robert Begay, Navajo Nation Clayton Palmer, WAPA 

Dave Cohen, Trout Unlimited Nikolai Ramsey, Grand Canyon Trust 

Christopher Harris, CRBC John Whipple, NM State Engineer’s Office 

Nancy Hornewer, USGS Michael Yeatts, The Hopi Tribe 

Matt Kaplinski, GCRG 

Alternates Present: For:

John O’Brien Matt Kaplinski, GCRG 

Wayne Cook John Whipple, NM State Engineer’s Office 

Gary Burton Clayton Palmer, WAPA 

Other Interested Parties:

Jan Balsom, NPS/GRCA Matt Mallory, BIA 

Mary Barger, WAPA Ted Melis, GCRMC/USGS 

Dave Busch, GCMRC/USGS Mary Orton, The Mary Orton Company 

Nancy Coulam, USBR Tom Ryan, USBR 

Steve Gloss, GCMRC/USGS 

Dennis Kubly, USBR 
Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program 

Technical Work Group Meeting 

May 17, 2002 

Presiding: Kurt Dongoske, Chairman 

Convened: 8:10 a.m. 

Committee Members Present:

Perri Benemelis, ADWR 

Kerry Christensen, Hualapai Tribe 

Wayne Cook, UCRC 

Jonathan Damp, Pueblo of Zuni 

William Davis, CREDA 

Brenda Drye, So. Paiute Consortium 

Lloyd Greiner, UAMPS 

Norm Henderson, GLCA 

Amy Heuslein, BIA 

Robert King, UDWR 

Phillip S. Lehr, Colo. River Comm./NV 

Bill Persons, AGFD 

Randall Peterson, USBR 

D. Randolph Seaholm CWCB 

John Shields, WY State Engineer’s Office 

Robert Winfree, NPS/GRCA 

Committee Members Absent:

Robert Begay, Navajo Nation Clayton Palmer, WAPA 

Dave Cohen, Trout Unlimited Nikolai Ramsey, Grand Canyon Trust 

Christopher Harris, CRBC John Whipple, NM State Engineer’s Office 

Nancy Hornewer, USGS Michael Yeatts, The Hopi Tribe 

Matt Kaplinski, GCRG 

Don Metz, USFWS 

Alternates Present: For:

John O’Brien Matt Kaplinski, GCRG 

Wayne Cook John Whipple, NM State Engineer’s Office 

Gary Burton Clayton Palmer, WAPA 

Other Interested Parties:

Jan Balsom, NPS/GRCA 

Mary Barger, WAPA 

Dave Busch, GCMRC/USGS 

Nancy Coulam, USBR 

Steve Gloss, GCMRC/USGS 

Dennis Kubly, USBR 

Ruth Lambert, GCMRC/USGS 

Lisa Leap, GRCA 

Mike Liszewski, USBR 

Matt Mallory, BIA 

Ted Melis, CGMRC/USGS 

Tom Ryan, USBR
#### VERIZON SERVICES CORP., Verizon Laboratories, Inc., and Verizon Communications, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP. and Vonage America, Inc., Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 2007-1240, 2007-1251, 2007-1274.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 24, 2007.

Peter C. McCabe, III, Winston & Strawn LLP, Chicago, IL, Richard G. Taranto, Farr & Taranto, Geoffrey Eaton, Charles B. Molster, III, Winston *&*Strawn LLP, Washington, DC, Brian C. Riopelle, McGuirewoods LLP, Richmond, VA, John Thorne, Verizon Communications Inc., Arlington, VA, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

Roger E. Warm, Richard K. Willard, Scott William Doyle, Seth Alain Watkins, Daniel Laurence Girdwood, Steptoe *&*Johnson, LLP, Washington, DC, for Defendants-Appellants.

Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, GAJARSA and DYK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

*ORDER*

Vonage Holdings Corp. et al. (Vonage) move for a stay, pending appeal, of the permanent injunction issued by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. Verizon Services Corp. et al. (Verizon) oppose. Vonage replies.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion for a stay, pending appeal, is granted.

(2) Vonage’s opening brief is due May 9, 2007. Verizon’s opening brief is due May 23, 2007. Vonage’s reply brief and the joint appendix are due May 30, 2007. All briefs must be hand-served.

(3) The appeal is scheduled for oral argument before the same panel at 10 a.m. on June 25, 2007.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Edward T. Schafer Agricultural Research Center: Fargo, ND
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    ETSARC Research Units
                        ETSARC Home page
                                    Office of the Center Director
                                    Location Support Staff
                                    Food Animal Metabolism Research Unit
                                    Cereal Crops Improvement Research Unit
                                    Weed & Insect Biology Research Unit
                                    Small Grain & Food Crops Quality Research Unit
                                    Sugarbeet Research Unit
                                    Sunflower Improvement Research Unit
                                    Pulse Crop Health Initiative
                                    National Sclerotinia InitiativeSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Fargo, North Dakota Edward T. Schafer Agricultural Research Center DOCS National Sclerotinia Initiative Folder







Accomplishment Reportsheadline bar  **home**  **2014**
**2013**
**2012**
**2011**
**2010**


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
# C_2006266EN.01001601.xml

| 31.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 266/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 266/16

---

European Network and Information Security Agency— Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2005

(2006/C 266/06)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

www.enisa.europa.eu

Source: Agency data — These tables summarise the data supplied by the Agency in its annual accounts.

Source:

Table 1

Implementation of the budget for the financial year 2005

| (1000 euro) |
| --- |
| Revenue | Expenditure |
| Source of revenue | Revenue entered in the final budget for the financial year | Revenue received | Allocation of expenditure | Final budget appropriations |
| entered | committed | paid | carried over | cancelled |
| Community subsidies | 6 346 | 4 400 | Title I
  Staff | 2 375 | 1 764 | 1 490 | 257 | 628 |
| | | | Title II
  Administration | 2 483 | 1 772 | 453 | 1 065 | 965 |
| | | | Title III
  Operating activities | 1 488 | 1 004 | 196 | 790 | 502 |
| Total | 6 346 | 4 400 | Total | 6 346 | 4 540 | 2 139 | 2 112 | 2 095 |

(1000 euro)

Revenue

Expenditure

Source of revenue

Revenue entered in the final budget for the financial year

Revenue received

Allocation of expenditure

Final budget appropriations

entered

committed

paid

carried over

cancelled

Community subsidies

6 346

4 400

Title I

Staff

2 375

1 764

1 490

257

628

Title II

Administration

2 483

1 772

453

1 065

965

Title III

Operating activities

1 488

1 004

196

790

502

Total

Total

6 346

4 400

Total

Total

6 346

4 540

2 139

2 112

2 095

Table 2

Revenue and expenditure account for the financial year 2005

| (1000 euro) |
| --- |
| | 2005 |
| Operating revenue |
| Community subsidies | 4 251 |
| Total (a) | 4 251 |
| Operating expenditure |
| Staff | 1 040 |
| Administration | 1 594 |
| Operating activities | 517 |
| Total (b) | 3 151 |
| Operating result (c = a - b) | 1 100 |

(1000 euro)

2005

Operating revenue

Community subsidies

4 251

Total (a)

Total (a)

4 251

4 251

Operating expenditure

Staff

1 040

Administration

1 594

Operating activities

517

Total (b)

Total (b)

3 151

3 151

Operating result (c = a - b)

Operating result (c = a - b)

1 100

1 100

Table 3

Balance sheet at 31 December 2005

| (1000 euro) |
| --- |
| | 2005 |
| Assets |
| Fixed assets | 344 |
| Receivables | 13 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 2 510 |
| Total | 2 867 |
| Liabilities |
| Accumulated surplus/deficit | 0 |
| Economic result for the year | 1 100 |
| Current liabilities | 1 767 |
| Total | 2 867 |

(1000 euro)

2005

Assets

Fixed assets

344

Receivables

13

Cash and cash equivalents

2 510

Total

Total

2 867

2 867

Liabilities

Accumulated surplus/deficit

0

Economic result for the year

1 100

Current liabilities

1 767

Total

Total

2 867

2 867

---
#### DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS OF CITY OF NEW YORK v. FIELD.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 23, 1896.)

Action by the Department of Buildings of the City of New York against Richard Field.

John V. Dahlgren, for plaintiff.

George Hill, for defendant.

PATTERSON, J.

In the condition of the agreed state of facts as it is presented to us, this matter cannot be considered. • It is specifically stated that Mr. Elbridge T. Gerry is the present owner of the premises mentioned in the submission. All that is stated with reference to the defendant, Field, is that he became the owner of the property in its existing condition; but that does not show that he is the owner of the property, and that the proceeding is taken against the owner. As we are not authorized to draw any inferences, or to import anything into the submission, we cannot act on these papers, but the matter may be resubmitted on a proper statement. All concur.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Manhattan, Kansas (NBAF)
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home People & Locations







Cassandra  Vetter
                        Foreign Animal Disease Research

                        




                        
                        Administrative Assistant
                        Phone:    
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<PAGE>


                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

         REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE



To The Board of Directors and Stockholders of QCS Corporation:

Our report on the consolidated financial statements of QCS Corporation is
included on page F-1 of this Form 10-KSB.  In connection with our audits of such
financial statements, we have also audited the related financial statement
schedule on page F-18 of this Form 10-KSB.

In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly, in all material respects, the information required to be
included therein.




San Jose, California                               PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
August 21, 1998


                                         F-20
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on July 12, 2021, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), ODVA, Inc. (“ODVA”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Radiometric Services & Instruments LLC, Frederick, MD; Ningbo AirTAC Automation Industrial Co., Ltd., Ningbo City, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA; Amphenol Canada Corp., Toronto, CANADA; Rheonik Messtechnik GmbH, Odelzhausen, GERMANY; Shenzhen Inovance Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA; and JFcontrol Co., Ltd., Suwon-si, SOUTH KOREA, have been added as parties to this venture.                

Also, RFID, Inc., Dothan, AL, has withdrawn as a party to this venture.

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and ODVA intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On June 21, 1995, ODVA filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on February 15, 1996 (61 FR 6039).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on April 6, 2021. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on April 20, 2021 (86 FR 20522).                

Suzanne Morris,

Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2021-18005 Filed 8-20-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________ N O . 09

- 23

- 00134

- CV

__________________ ALABASTER, INC. AND JOHN SHEFFIELD , Appellant s V. BRENT W. COON AND BRENT W. COON, PC D/B/A BRENT COON & ASSOCIATES , Appellee s

__________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 172n d District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. E199958

__________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION On June 20, 2024, we abated this appeal and remanded the case to the trial

court to give the trial court the opportunity to issue such further orders or judgments necessary to clarify its April 6, 2023 Order or to create a final, appealable order in
this cause

. See Lehmann v. Har

- Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191, 206 (Tex. 2001). The
Court order further stated : “Unless a final, appealable order or judgment is included in a supplemental clerk’s record and filed with the clerk of this court on or before2 July 22, 2024, the appeal will be reinstated and dismissed for want of jurisdiction.” To date, we have not received a supplemental clerk’s record. No party requested additional time to obtain a final judgment or severance order. The appeal is hereby reinstated

. Generally , an appeal may be taken only from final judgments and interlocutory orders specifically made appealable by statute. See
id. at 195. To be final, a judgment must dispose of all issues and parties in a case. N.E. Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Aldridge , 400 S.W.2d 893, 895 (Tex. 1966). As we explained in our Order of June 20, 2024, the trial court’s Order of April 6, 2023, which granted Coon’s motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ claims against the defendants, failed to dispose of the defendants’ counterclaims for attorney’s fees and sancti ons. The appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction

. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3 (a) ; 43.2(f).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM

Submitted on June 24, 2024 Opinion Delivered August 8, 2024 Before Golemon, C.J., Johnson and Chambers, JJ.
BRYNN BRYANT,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-0884

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 2, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Frank Sheffield, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE, SWANSON, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7110

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. PRESTON GATTIS, JR., Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:02-cr-01156-DCN-1)

Submitted: August 26, 2009 Decided: September 3, 2009

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Preston Gattis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert Nicholas Bianchi, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Preston Gattis, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for new trial under Fed. R. Crim. P. 33, based upon newly discovered evidence. The district court concluded that the motion was untimely. We agree. Under Rule 33, Gattis had “3 years after the verdict or finding of guilty” to file his motion. Fed. R. Crim. P. 33(b)(1). The jury found Gattis guilty on October 16, 2003. Because Gattis did not file his Rule 33 motion until October 9, 2008, at the earliest, we conclude that he did not timely file the motion. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s denial of relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 169 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to remove the 96-hour 

physician certification requirement for inpatient critical access hospital 

services. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2015 

Mr. SMITH of Nebraska (for himself, Mr. WALDEN, Ms. JENKINS of Kansas, 

Mr. LOEBSACK, and Mr. YOUNG of Indiana) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to remove 

the 96-hour physician certification requirement for inpatient critical access hospital services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Critical Access Hos5 pital Relief Act of 2015’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 169 IH

1 SEC. 2. REMOVING MEDICARE 96-HOUR PHYSICIAN CER2 TIFICATION REQUIREMENT FOR INPATIENT 

3 CRITICAL ACCESS HOSPITAL SERVICES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1814(a) of the Social Se5 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395f(a)) is amended— 

6 (1) in paragraph (6), by adding ‘‘and’’ at the 

7 end; 

8 (2) in paragraph (7), at the end of subpara9 graph (E), by striking ‘‘and’’ and inserting a period; 

10 and 

11 (3) by striking paragraph (8). 

12 (b) APPLICATION.—The amendments made by sub13 section (a) shall apply with respect to items and services 

14 furnished on or after January 1, 2015. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS