alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Ben Corey-Moran, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of
Thanksgiving Coffee Company, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small
business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting;

5. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the Equivalent functions);

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;

b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



|      |  |                  
|----- |  | -----------------
|Date: |  | November 15, 2010

|                           |  |                    
|-------------------------- |  | -------------------
|                           | 
|By:                        |  | /s/ Ben Corey-Moran
|Ben Corey-Moran, President
UNITED STATES

Appellee



### v.

Kevin MAXWELL Staff Sergeant ( E

- 6 )

U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant NMCCA NO. 2021001 80

Panel 3

ORDER

Granting Appellant’s Motion
to Withdraw Case from
Appellate Review

Upon consideration of A ppellant ’ s Motion to Wit hdraw Case from Appellate Review, filed on 1 6 Novem ber 2021 , we have determined that A ppellant ’ srequest was properly executed and submitted, and is in substantial compliance with Article 61, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 861, and

Rule for Courts

- Martial 111 5

. Accordingly, it is, by the Court, this 16 th day of Novem ber 202 1

,

ORDERED:

(1) That A ppellant ’ s Motion to Withdraw Appellate Review is GRANTED

. ( 2 ) That the record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General fo r appropriate disposition.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR.

Clerk of Court

Copy to:
45 ( LT Dempsey )

46

02
PAGE 1 – ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

JORDAN M. BARNETT,

Plaintiff,

v.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting 

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

Case No. 3:15-cv-987-JE

ORDER

Michael H. Simon, District Judge.

United States Magistrate Judge John Jelderks issued Findings and Recommendation in 

this case on March 2, 2017. ECF 20. Judge Jelderks recommended that the Commissioner’s 

decision should be reversed, and this action should be remanded pursuant to sentence four of 42 

U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Findings and 

Recommendation. No party has filed objections.

Under the Federal Magistrates Act (“Act”), the court may “accept, reject, or modify, in 

whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(1). If a party files objections to a magistrate’s findings and recommendations, “the court 

Case 3:15-cv-00987-JE Document 22 Filed 03/23/17 Page 1 of 2
PAGE 2 – ORDER

shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings 

or recommendations to which objection is made.” Id.; Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3).

If no party objects, the Act does not prescribe any standard of review. See Thomas v. Arn, 

474 U.S. 140, 152 (1985) (“There is no indication that Congress, in enacting [the Act], intended 

to require a district judge to review a magistrate’s report to which no objections are filed.”); 

United States. v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (holding that the 

court must review de novo magistrate’s findings and recommendations if objection is made, “but 

not otherwise”). 

Although review is not required in the absence of objections, the Act “does not preclude 

further review by the district judge[] sua sponte . . . under a de novo or any other standard.” 

Thomas, 474 U.S. at 154. Indeed, the Advisory Committee Notes to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) 

recommend that “[w]hen no timely objection is filed,” the court review the magistrate’s findings 

and recommendations for “clear error on the face of the record.”

No party having made objections, this Court follows the recommendation of the Advisory 

Committee and reviews Judge Jelderk’s Findings and Recommendation for clear error on the 

face of the record. No such error is apparent. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS Judge Jelderk’s 

Findings and Recommendation, ECF 20. The Commissioner’s decision is REVERSED. This 

action is REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further 

administrative proceedings consistent with the Findings and Recommendation (ECF 20).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 23rd day of March, 2017.

/s/ Michael H. Simon

Michael H. Simon

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-00987-JE Document 22 Filed 03/23/17 Page 2 of 2
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Range Management Research: Las Cruces, NM
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Comprehensive Publications
                    Research SummarySearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Las Cruces, New Mexico Range Management Research Docs





- Landscape Toolbox
- Long Term Agricultural Research
- EcoTrends
- Long Term Ecological Research
- Ecological Site Descriptions
- Monitoring & Assessment
- Southwest Climate Hub
- Land Potential Knowledge System
- National Ecological Observatory Network
- JournalMap
- Assessment, Inventory, and Monitoring (AIM)
- Data Catalogs

DUNE MARGIN TREATMENTheadline bar


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Food Surveys Research Group: Beltsville, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Beltsville, Maryland (BHNRC) Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center Food Surveys Research Group People & Locations







Suzanne  Morton
                        Food Surveys Research Group

                        




                        
                        Post Doc (Research Associate)
                        Phone: (301) 504-0176
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
exv10w10






EXHIBIT 10.10



Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) has entered into an agreement with each of the following persons, which is
substantially identical, except as set forth below, to the form of
Employment Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.9 to this Annual Report
on Form 10-K.




Najabat H. Bajwa




Kurt F. Busch




Ron Cates




Jing Cao




Raouf Y. Halim




Gerald J. Hamilton




Bret W. Johnsen




Anil S. Mankar




Thomas J. Medrek




Thomas O. Morton




Preetinder S. Virk



The multiple set forth in Section 6(i)(B) of the Employment Agreement for Mr. Halim is three and the multiple set
forth in Section 6(i)(B) of the Employment Agreement for the other persons is two.
#### HARRIS, Respondent, v. GREGG, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

January 20, 1896.)

Action by John L. Harris against David Gregg, as committee, etc., of Amasa N. Gregg, an incompetent person.

No opinion. Motion denied, on condition that appellant refund to respondent the sum of $35 within 10 days after service of a certified copy of this order; otherwise, granted, with $10 costs and disbursements.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 USC SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of Medallion Financial Corp. (the Company) for the quarter ending September 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



|                                                  |  |                  
|------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------
|By:                                               |  | /s/ Larry D. Hall
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Date: November 7, 2012
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Manhattan, Kansas (NBAF)
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home People & Locations







Jessica  Hagedorn
                        Physical Security

                        




                        
                        Physical Security Specialist
                        Phone: (785) 712-3949
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
(9 App. Div. 27.)

#### STOUTENBURG v. HUMPHREY.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

September 29, 1896.)

Justices of the Peace—Unauthorized Adjournment.

Under Code Civ. Proc. §§ 2959, 29G0, providing that a justice may grant an adjournment only at the time of the return of the summons or of joining issue, an adjournment after such time, unless by consent of the parties, is unauthorized, and the justice thereby loses jurisdiction.

Appeal from Ulster county court.

Action by Harriet Stoutenburg against Egbert Humphrey. From a judgment of the county court affirming a judgment of the justice of the peace rendered in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed.

Argued before PARKER, P. J., and LANDON, MERWIN, HERRICK, and PUTNAM, JJ.

James Jenkins, for appellant.

Charles Irwin, for respondent.

*141PARKER, P. J.

It appears from the justice’s return in this action that issue was joined on the 14th of May, 1895, and that by mutual consent the case was then adjourned to June 20, 1895. On such adjourned day the case was again adjourned by consent of both parties to June 28, 1895, at 9 o’clock a. m. On such last adjourned day the plaintiff appeared at the hour and place of adjournment. The defendant did not appear. At the request of the plaintiff, and upon the statement of his attorney that the counsel of both parties so desired, the case was again “held open” until July 15, 1895. There was no proof whatever of any agreement between counsel that an adjournment should be had, and the statement so made was of no legal force, and furnished no authority- for it. Proudfit v. Henman, 8 Johns. 305. On the 15th of July, at the adjourned hour, the plaintiff again appeared and the defendant did not appear. The justice thereupon, in the absence of the defendant, proceeded to take proof of the plaintiff’s claim, and upon the proof so taken rendered judgment against the defendant. From such judgment an appeal was taken to the county court, where it was affirmed, and from the judgment of affirmance this appeal is brought.

Section 2959 of the Code provides when a justice may, on his own motion, adjourn a case. Section 2960 provides when he may adjourn it on the application of the plaintiff. Both of these sections confine the adjournment to the time of joining of issue, and (except in the instance provided for in section 2944, where an amendment of the pleading has been had) no other authority is given to the justice to adjourn on the motion of the plaintiff without the consent of the defendant. It is very clear, therefore, that the adjournment from June 28th to July 15th was unauthorized. The case was therefore out of court when the judgment was rendered, and hence such judgment was utterly unauthorized. Redford v. Snow, 46 Hun, 370; Crisp v. Rice, 83 Hun, 465, 31 N. Y. Supp. 908; Proudfit v. Henman, 8 Johns. 305.

The conclusion is that the judgment of the county court and of the justice must be reversed, with costs. All concur".
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of OmniComm
Systems, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, being, Ronald T. Linares, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/s/ Ronald T. Linares                     
|Ronald T. Linares                         
|Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



August 10, 2005
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Parlier, California
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home People & Locations







Julio  Infante Gutierrez
                        Location Support Staff

                        




                        
                        Farmer Tractor Operator
                        Phone: (559) 596-2920
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov