alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information extracted from the Form 10-Q and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001000235
<NAME> PATRIOT BANK CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             897
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,175
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    145,202
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          66,257
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            65,703
<LOANS>                                        264,634
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (1,855)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 489,558
<DEPOSITS>                                     219,852
<SHORT-TERM>                                   183,500
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,805
<LONG-TERM>                                     30,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            39
<OTHER-SE>                                      51,362
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  51,401
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 13,152
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                7,249
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    91
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                20,492
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               7,167
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,481
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            8,844
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      205
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  7,053
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,966
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,167
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,167
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .275
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .275
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.18
<LOANS-NON>                                        671
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,702
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       52
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,855
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,855
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 165 (Monday, August 30, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 48462]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-18626]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 11516]

Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Object Being 
Imported for Exhibition--Determinations: ``Piranesi on the Page'' 
Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that one object being imported from abroad pursuant to 
an agreement with its foreign owner or custodian for temporary display 
in the exhibition ``Piranesi on the Page'' at the Princeton University 
Library, Princeton, New Jersey, and at possible additional exhibitions 
or venues yet to be determined, is of cultural significance, and, 
further, that its temporary exhibition or display within the United 
States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered 
that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the Federal 
Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chi D. Tran, Program Administrator, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6471; email: [email protected]). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000.

Matthew R. Lussenhop,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2021-18626 Filed 8-27-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Reginald Small, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Naro, J.), rendered July 7, 1982, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant has not preserved for appellate review the issue of the plea allocution’s sufficiency *(see, People v Pellegrino,*60 NY2d 636). Moreover, were we to review this issue in the interest of justice, reversal would not be warranted. The record indicates that the defendant’s plea was knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently made *(see, People v Harris,*61 NY2d 9).

Defense counsel’s apparent argument that the factual recitation of the underlying crime might have been insufficient is without merit *(see, People v Riley,*120 AD2d 752; *People v Dixon,*119 AD2d 831). Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Weinstein, Kunzeman and Spatt, JJ., concur.
#### PEOPLE ex rel. MITCHELL v. LONG et al.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.

December 2, 1895.)

Action by the people on the relation of Anna Minott Mitchell, as administrator, etc., against Edward B. Long and others, composing the board of trustees of White Plains and others.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. DYKMAN, J., not sitting.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       2,320,010
<SECURITIES>                                 7,867,619
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,339,559
<ALLOWANCES>                                   200,000
<INVENTORY>                                 18,242,066
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            32,037,503
<PP&E>                                       2,014,439
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,119,875
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              33,320,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,393,561
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       152,880
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,773,859
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                33,320,300
<SALES>                                     11,859,765
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,859,765
<CGS>                                        7,474,065
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,474,065
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,041,598
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,344,102
<INCOME-TAX>                                    22,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,321,602
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,321,602
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08



</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Oak Hill  Financial,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John D.
Kidd, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.






/s/ John D. Kidd
----------------------------------
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
May 5, 2003

                                      -21-
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 10-K and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         1,790
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  18,395
<ALLOWANCES>                                   8,408
<INVENTORY>                                    28,257
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               55,339
<PP&E>                                         27,922
<DEPRECIATION>                                 13,168
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 98,960
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          28,047
<BONDS>                                        8,215
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       72
<OTHER-SE>                                     42,252
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   98,960
<SALES>                                        161,860
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               161,860
<CGS>                                          130,763
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  130,763
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               26,513
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3,801
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,467
<INCOME-TAX>                                   365
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,102
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,102
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .15
        


</TABLE>
#### In re WILLIAMS.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March, 1896.)

Application by Harry D. Williams to compel the county clerk of Erie county to file certificates of nominations.

No opinion. Order reversed, with costs.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 USC
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Medallion Financial Corp. (the Company) for the quarter ending June 30, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



|                        |  |                   
|----------------------- |  | ------------------
|By:                     |  | /s/ Alvin Murstein
|Chairman and           
|Chief Executive Officer



|                     |  | 
|-------------------- |  | 
|Date: August 9, 2016
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.1

                                CERTIFICATION (1)


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor
Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as adopted), Robert Portman, Chief
Executive Officer and President of PacificHealth Laboratories, Inc. (the
"Company"), and Stephen P. Kuchen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each
hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

     1. The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
September 30, 2002, and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.1
(the "Periodic Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the
period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company
for the period covered by the Periodic Report.


DATE: November 12, 2002

      By: /s/ Robert Portman
        -----------------------------------------------
         Robert Portman, Chief Executive Officer
         (Principal Executive Officer)



DATE: November 12, 2002

       By: /s/ Stephen P. Kuchen
         ----------------------------------------------
         Stephen P. Kuchen, Chief Financial Officer
          (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) THIS CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANIES THIS REPORT PURSUANT TO SS. 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 AND SHALL NOT BE DEEMED "FILED" BY THE COMPANY FOR
PURPOSES OF SECTION 18 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED.




                                       15
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM OROAMERICA,
INC.'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JANUARY 30, 1998 AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED JANUARY 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          30,351
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,429
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,802
<INVENTORY>                                     12,772
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66,338
<PP&E>                                          22,640
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,234
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  86,665
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,127
<BONDS>                                          2,341
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                      66,191
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    86,665
<SALES>                                        159,720
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               159,720
<CGS>                                          123,800
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  123,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   763
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,894
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,947
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,269
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,678
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,678
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.06
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Luis Felipe Martinez, Appellant, v Lesley Torres, Respondent.

[943 NYS2d 907] —

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Joseph, J.), dated April 26, 2011, which denied his objections to so much of an order of the same court (Shamahs, S.M.), dated March 7, 2011, as, after a hearing, denied that branch of his petition which was to reduce the amount of arrears which accrued prior to the filing of the petition.

Ordered that the order dated April 26, 2011, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly determined that because the issues raised by the father in his objections were previously raised and decided against him on prior appeals in this matter *(see Matter of Martinez v Torres,*59 AD3d 449 [2009]; *Matter of Martinez v Torres,*26 AD3d 496 [2006]), reconsideration of those issues was barred by the doctrine of law of the case *(see Matter of Suzuki-Peters v Peters,*37 AD3d 726 [2007]). Thus, the Family Court properly denied the father’s objections. Dillon, J.P., Florio, Lott and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
#### HILL, Respondent, v. McGREGOR, Appellant.

(Superior Court of Buffalo,

General Term.

December 23, 1895.)

Action by John Hill, by guardian, against John -McGregor.

No opinion. Judgment and order appealed from affirmed, with costs. HATCH, J., did not sit in this case.
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT


To the Partners
T. Rowe Price Realty Income Fund IV,
America's Sales-Commission-Free Real Estate Limited Partnership:

We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of T. Rowe Price Realty
Income Fund IV, America's Sales-Commission-Free Real Estate Limited
Partnership and its consolidated ventures as of December 31, 1996 and
1995, and the related consolidated statements of operations, partners'
capital and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period
ended December 31, 1996.  In connection with our audits of the
consolidated financial statements, we also have audited the related
financial statement schedule.  These consolidated financial statements
and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the
Partnership's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards.  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial
statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the consolidated financial statements.  An audit also
includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
consolidated financial statement presentation.  We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of T.
Rowe Price Realty Income Fund IV, America's Sales-Commission-Free Real
Estate Limited Partnership and its consolidated ventures as of
December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the results of their operations and
their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 1996, in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.  Also in our opinion, the related financial statement
schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material
respects, the information set forth therein.



                                KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Chicago, Illinois
January 27, 1997
#### SAUER et al., Respondents, v. ANGLE LAMP CO., Appellant.

(Common Pleas of New York City and County,

Additional General Term.

December 27, 1895.)

Action by William Sauer and another against the Angle Lamp Company.

Greene & Johnson, for appellants.

Cromwell G. Macy, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

This action was brought to recover for work, labor, and services in making a mold for a glass lamp for the defendant. According to plaintiffs’ testimony they first wished a wooden mold for the lamp, of which the defendant furnished a sketch, which upon trial proved successful; but the defendant desired some change made in the form of the lamp, whereupon the plaintiffs endeavored to make an iron mold, which would produce the required form, but, after several attempts, failed to produce one which would work successfully. The defendant contends that the plaintiffs undertook to produce the required mold which could be used in the business, and, as they did not, they should receive no compensation for their work. The plaintiffs, on .the other hand, contend that all that they did was under the direction and supervision of the officers of the defendant company; that they did make a wooden mold which produced a lamp according to the sketch, and that the iron mold did not rvork satisfactorily because of the changes made under defendant’s direction. The justice allowed the plaintiffs’ claim so far as the original work was concerned, but refused to allow for the alterations, presumably upon the ground that they would produce a mold embodying the changes proposed by defendant, and would work successfully; and we think the evidence justified him in reaching both of these conclusions, and that the judgment should be affirmed, with costs to respondent.
**EXHIBIT
      32**


**CERTIFICATION**





Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350),
      each
      of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of ITLA
      Capital Corporation (the “Company”) that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form
      10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
      the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of
      the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements included
      in
      such report.











Date:
                May 10, 2007
            /s/
                George W. HaligowskiGeorge
                W. HaligowskiChairman
                of the Board, President andChief
                Executive Officer





Date:
                May 10, 2007
            /s/
                Timothy M. DoyleTimothy
                M. DoyleExecutive
                Managing Director andChief
                Financial Officer