alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

Calendar No. 527

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2171

[Report No. 105–290]

To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act applicable to the

construction of a hydroelectric project in the State of Arkansas.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 16, 1998

Mr. BUMPERS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

AUGUST 25, 1998

Reported under authority of the order of the Senate of July 31, 1998, by Mr.

MURKOWSKI, without amendment

A BILL

To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act applicable to the construction of a hydroelectric project in the

State of Arkansas.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINES.

4 Notwithstanding the time limitations of section 13 of

5 the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806), the Federal En-
2

S 2171 RS

1 ergy Regulatory Commission, upon the request of the li2 censee for FERC Project No. 10455 (and after reasonable

3 notice), is authorized, in accordance with the good faith,

4 due diligence and public interest requirements of section

5 13 and the Commission’s procedures under such section,

6 to extend the time required for commencement of con7 struction of the project for up to a maximum of three con8 secutive two-year periods. This section shall take effect for

9 the project upon the expiration of the extension (issued

10 by the Commission under section 13) of the period re11 quired for commencement of such project.

Calendar No. 527

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2171

[Report No. 105–290]

A BILL

To extend the deadline under the Federal Power

electric project in the State of Arkansas.Act applicable to the construction of a hydroAUGUST 25, 1998

Reported under authority of the order of the Senate of

July 31, 1998, by Mr. MURKOWSKI, without amendment
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 
      e)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within the entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;f)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;g)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andh)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  c)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andd)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.
 /s/ Michael D. AndereckMichael D. AndereckInterim Senior Vice President, Finance andAdministration(Principal Financial Officer)December 7, 2005
Document

Exhibit 10.8

Amendment to Employment Letter
This Amendment to Employment Letter (this “Amendment”) is made as of March 27, 2020 by and between Scientific Games Corporation, a Nevada corporation, (the “Company”) and Stephen Richardson (“Executive”).
WHEREAS, the Company extended a written offer of employment to Executive on February 21, 2018, which Executive accepted that same day (the “Employment Letter”);
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual benefits to be derived herefrom and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 
1.Decrease in Base Salary.  The Employment Letter is hereby amended by adding the following sentence to the end of the section of the Employment Letter captioned “Compensation”:
“Effective as of April 5, 2020, Executive will be paid seventy-six thousand, two hundred and seventy-three U.S. dollars ($76,273) of base salary until and through June 30, 2020, and Executive’s annual base salary of four hundred thousand U.S. dollars ($400,000) is reduced by nineteen thousand and sixty-eight U.S. dollars ($19,068), representing the portion of his annual base salary attributable to the period from April 5, 2020 through June 30, 2020.”
2. Except as set forth in this Amendment, all terms and conditions of the Employment Letter shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect in accordance with their terms.  All references to the “letter” in the Employment Letter shall refer to the Employment Letter as amended by this Amendment. Any defined terms used in this Amendment and not defined herein shall have the meaning as set forth in the Employment Letter.
        3. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall for all purposes be deemed to be an original and all of which shall constitute the same instrument.  Delivery of an executed counterpart of a signature page of this Amendment by electronic transmission shall be effective as delivery of a manually executed counterpart of this Amendment.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has duly executed this Amendment as of March 27, 2020.
SCIENTIFIC GAMES CORPORATION




By:    /s/ Shawn Williams 
Name: Shawn Williams 
Title: Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer
        


        /s/ Stephen Richardson 
Stephen Richardson
1
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jonathan BISHOP, also known as Willie Bruce Allen, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-40133

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 30, 2007.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Laura Fletcher Leavitt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before REAVLEY, GARZA and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jonathan Bishop appeals the 24-month sentence imposed following the revocation of supervised release. He contends that the district court erred by finding that the conduct that resulted in revocation, possession of a small amount of cocaine, was a *465Grade B violation rather than a Grade C violation.

A conviction for possession of any amount of cocaine could have resulted in Bishop’s imprisonment for more than one year under Texas law. *See*Texas Health & Safety Code § 481.112; Texas Penal Code § 12.35(a). The conduct therefore constituted a Grade B violation, and the sentence was within the proper advisory guidelines range. *See*U.S.S.G. §§ 7Bl.l(a)(2), 7B1.4(a)(table).

In any event, the sentence did not exceed the statutory maximum, and the district court considered the sentencing factors of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) when choosing the sentence. The sentence was thus neither “unreasonable” nor “plainly unreasonable.” *See United States v. Hinson,*429 F.3d 114, 119-20 (5th Cir.2005), *cert. denied,*547 U.S. 1083, 126 S.Ct. 1804, 164 L.Ed.2d 540 (2006).

The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under *465the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Case 3:14-cv-01399-SI    Document 1    Filed 08/29/14    Page 1 of 10

Case 3:14-cv-01399-SI    Document 1    Filed 08/29/14    Page 2 of 10

Case 3:14-cv-01399-SI    Document 1    Filed 08/29/14    Page 3 of 10

Case 3:14-cv-01399-SI    Document 1    Filed 08/29/14    Page 4 of 10

Case 3:14-cv-01399-SI    Document 1    Filed 08/29/14    Page 5 of 10

Case 3:14-cv-01399-SI    Document 1    Filed 08/29/14    Page 6 of 10

Case 3:14-cv-01399-SI    Document 1    Filed 08/29/14    Page 7 of 10

Case 3:14-cv-01399-SI    Document 1    Filed 08/29/14    Page 8 of 10

Case 3:14-cv-01399-SI    Document 1    Filed 08/29/14    Page 9 of 10

Case 3:14-cv-01399-SI    Document 1    Filed 08/29/14    Page 10 of 10
Document

April 1, 2020
Mr. Nate Troup


RE: Amendment to April 1, 2020 Offer Letter between Red Lion Hotels Corporation and Nate Troup (“Existing Employment Agreement”)
Dear Nate:
This letter (the “Amendment”) is intended to clarify certain terms in your Existing Employment Agreement.  Unless otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms shall have the meaning set forth in the Existing Employment Agreement.
With respect to any severance benefits to which you may become entitled that are based upon your “annual base salary” for the current fiscal year, any temporary reduction to your annual base salary that has been approved by the Company as part of its response to the COVID-19 crisis will not be taken into account for purposes of calculating any severance amount due.    
Other than as modified above, the Existing Employment Agreement will remain in full force and effect.  This Amendment is effective as of the first date set forth above.


Please execute below to indicate your agreement to the terms of this Amendment.
Sincerely,


/s/ John Russell                                     
John Russell
Interim President & CEO


Accepted as of the date first set forth above


/s/ Nate Troup                                      
Nate Troup
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Pacific Shellfish Research Unit: Newport, OR
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Newport, Oregon Pacific Shellfish Research Unit Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Collaborations The Pacific Shellfish Research Unit has a long and productive history of collaborative research involving stakeholders.  Current collaborators and projects:  Identifying Genetic Factors Associated with the Expression and Regulation of Economically Important Traits in Cultured Pacific Oysters


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Louis Prichard, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Kentucky Bancshares,
Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
quarterly report is being prepared;
(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting; and


5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting.
Date:   November 14, 2006
BY  /s/ Louis Prichard
    Louis Prichard
    President & Chief Executive Officer
25
Lexlibrary/197885.1
1 – OPINION AND ORDER 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

PORTLAND DIVISION 

PHILLIP DAVIS, JR. et al.,

No. 3:15-cv-01750-AC

Plaintiffs,

OPINION AND ORDER

v. 

COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, 

et al.,

Defendants. 

MOSMAN, J., 

On November 30, 2016, Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta issued his Findings and 

Recommendation (“F&R”) [37], recommending that I DENY Mr. Davis’s Motion for Order of 

Default Judgment [16], that I GRANT Defendants’ Request for Judicial Notice [24], and that I 

GRANT the Motion to Dismiss the Complaint [23]. Mr. Davis objected [39] and Defendants 

failed to respond. 

DISCUSSION 

The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may 

file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge, 

but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to 

make a de novo determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or 

recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). However, the court 

Case 3:15-cv-01750-AC Document 40 Filed 01/24/17 Page 1 of 2
2 – OPINION AND ORDER 

is not required to review, de novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of 

the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See 

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 

(9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F&R 

depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject, 

or modify any part of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). 

Upon careful review, I agree with Judge Acosta’s recommendations and I ADOPT the 

F&R [37] as my own. Mr. Davis’s Motion for Order of Default Judgment [16] is DENIED. 

Defendants’ Request for Judicial Notice [24] is GRANTED. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss 

[23] is GRANTED. Mr. Davis’s claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this ________ day of January, 2017. 

____________________________ 

MICHAEL W. MOSMAN 

Chief United States District Judge 

24

/s/ Michael W. Mosman

Case 3:15-cv-01750-AC Document 40 Filed 01/24/17 Page 2 of 2
#### THALMAN, Appellant, v. THALMAN, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.

December 18, 1895.)

Action by Sarah G. Thalman against Samuel Thalman.

Andrew Blake, for appellant.

David Leventritt, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This action was brought to obtain a decree of separation, and was defended on the ground that the plaintiff and defendant are not, and never have been, husband and wife. The trial court so found, and dismissed the complaint. The plaintiff did not claim that a marriage ceremony had been solemnized by minister, priest, or magistrate, but that a verbal marriage contract was entered into between the plaintiff and defendant on the 30th day of April, 1892; and the only question presented on this appeal is whether the finding by the trial court that there was no such contract is against the weight of evidence. An attentive examination of the evidence satisfies us that, under the rules which govern this coxirt in reviewing questions of fact, the finding of the special term must stand. As no good purpose can be accomplished by á discussion of the evidence, we refrain from doing it. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Case 3:15-cv-01953-MO Document 1-2 Filed 10/16/15 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 3:15-cv-01953-MO Document 1-2 Filed 10/16/15 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0001000235
<NAME> PATRIOT BANK CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1.000
<CASH>                                           2,626
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          17,090
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     86,659
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         337,726
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           328,334
<LOANS>                                        658,272
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (6,261)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,160,943
<DEPOSITS>                                     566,074
<SHORT-TERM>                                   275,639
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              7,891
<LONG-TERM>                                    261,061
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,279
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,160,943
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 13,189
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                7,244
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    61
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                20,494
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,897
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,181
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,313
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      300
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,582
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,938
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,488
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.46
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,679
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 6,082
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      138
<RECOVERIES>                                        17
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                6,261
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          6,261


</TABLE>