alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANTHONY LUNA ELISEO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 10-71233

Agency No. A075-475-581

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 5, 2012** 

Pasadena, California

Before: PREGERSON, GOULD, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Anthony Luna Eliseo (“Eliseo”), a native and citizen of the Philippines, and

a legal permanent resident of the United States, petitions for review of the Board of

FILED

MAR 07 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
-2-

Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order finding removability. We have jurisdiction

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition. 

Eliseo’s conviction for violating California Health and Safety Code § 11378

is an aggravated felony under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(B); see Cazarez-Gutierrez v.

Ashcroft, 382 F.3d 905, 919 (9th Cir. 2004) (a state drug offense is an aggravated

felony for immigration purposes if it contains a trafficking element). Contrary to

Eliseo’s contention, the record of conviction namely the admission to the charges

alleged by the Department of Homeland Security established that Eliseo was

convicted of § 11378, possession for sale of a controlled substance, to wit

methamphetamine. See Pagayon v. Holder, Nos.07-74047, 07-75129, 2011 WL

6091276, *4 (9th Cir. Dec. 8, 2011) (holding that “an alien’s concession of

removability or admission of facts establishing removability, if accepted by the IJ

completely relieves the government of the burden of producing evidence ”). 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
#### Village of Lindenhurst, Appellant, v Hendrickson Bros., Inc., Respondent.

[942 NYS2d 808]

In an action to recover damages for continuing public nuisance, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Molia, J.), dated June 6, 2011, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as time-barred.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff alleges that, pursuant to a contract with Suffolk County, the defendant completed certain sewer construction *1101work in 1978, and. that defects in the construction work constitute and contribute to a continuing public nuisance. The action is time-barred for the reasons stated in the companion case of *Village of Lindenhurst v J.D. Posillico, Inc.*(94 AD3d 1101 [2012] [decided herewith]).

The plaintiffs contentions relating to alleged statutory violations are not properly before this Court. Rivera, J.E, Dillon, Angiolillo and Leventhal, JJ., concur.
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

June 11, 2004

Mr. David Vandiver Wilson

Hays McConn Rice & Pickering

1200 Smith Street, Suite 400

Houston, TX 77002

Mr. Stuart J. Starry

Starry & Associates

1225 North Loop West, Ste. 1101

Houston, TX 77008

Mr. Richard Eugene Norman

Crowley Douglas & Norman, LLP

1301 McKinney, Suite 3500

Houston, TX 77010

RE:Case Number:  02-0401

Court of Appeals Number:  06-01-00104-CV

Trial Court Number:  99-42848A

Style:SHELL OIL COMPANY

v.

MOHAMMED KHAN AND JAMILA WILLIAMS

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas delivered the enclosed opinion and judgment in the above-referenced cause. 

Sincerely,

Andrew Weber, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosures

**Case No. 02-0401Page 2**
(November 13, 1986)

#### John Califra, Appellant, v Fireman’s Fund Insurance Companies, Respondent.

On November 17, 1977, petitioner was in an automobile *485accident. A problem relating to no-fault payments led to arbitration and an award. By notice dated August 30, 1985, petitioner began this CPLR article 75 proceeding to modify the award. Respondent insurance company opposed modification. The petition was denied. Looking to Insurance Law § 5106 (c), the court stated, "an award by an arbitrator for the payment of first party benefits shall be binding except where vacated or modified by a master arbitrator.”

All parties to the appeal now agree section 5106 (c) does not apply to a pre-December 1, 1977 accident. *(See,*L 1977, ch 892, § 17.) Therefore, without passing on the merits, we reverse the order denying the petition and remand to the Supreme Court for review on the merits. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Milonas, Rosenberger and Ellerin, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2015

CHARLES STEVEN MCLEAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CALDWELL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL; CALDWELL COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF 

SOCIAL SERVICES; FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF LENOIR,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. 

Voorhees, District Judge. (5:15-cv-00100-RLV-DSC)

Submitted: January 14, 2016 Decided: January 19, 2016

Before AGEE, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Steven McLean, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Charles Steven McLean appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find 

that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny McLean’s 

motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for 

the reasons stated by the district court. McLean v. Caldwell 

Mem’l Hosp., No. 5:15-cv-00100-RLV-DSC (W.D.N.C. Aug. 18, 2015). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-14-0001353

23-JAN-2019

08:26 AM
Case 3:15-cv-00665-SI Document 32 Filed 05/01/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:15-cv-00665-SI Document 32 Filed 05/01/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:15-cv-00665-SI Document 32 Filed 05/01/15 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 32.1


                     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Landauer, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, William E. Saxelby, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
of my knowledge and belief:

i.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

ii.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Landauer, Inc. and will be retained by Landauer, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.




                               /s/ William E. Saxelby
                               William E. Saxelby
                               President & Chief Executive Officer



December 13, 2010
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

JOSE ANTONIO ALVAREZ, )

) Case No. 6:15-cv-01981-YY

Plaintiff, )

) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. ) MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES 

) PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) 

COMMISSIONER, )

Social Security Administration, )

)

Defendant. )

_________________________________ )

YOU, Magistrate Judge:

Plaintiff Jose Antonio Alvarez brought this action seeking review of the Commissioner’s 

final decision denying his application for Disability Insurance Benefits under the Social Security 

Act. The Court reversed the Commissioner’s decision, remanded the case for further 

proceedings, and entered judgment on December 6, 2016.

Plaintiff now seeks an award of fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Defendant has not 

objected to the request. I have reviewed the record in this case, the motion, and the supporting 

materials, including the award of benefits, the fee agreement with counsel, and the recitation of 

counsel’s hours and services. Applying the standards set by Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 

789, 796 (2002), the Court finds that the requested fees are reasonable.
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) 

[6:15-cv-01981-YY]

Page 2 of 2

Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 406(b) [25] is hereby 

GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s counsel is awarded $13,314.90 in attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 

406(b). Previously, the Court awarded Plaintiff attorney fees in the amount of $6,150.97 under 

the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. In addition, Plaintiff’s hearing 

representative will receive an administrative fee of $6,000.00. When issuing the § 406(b) check 

for payment to Plaintiff’s attorney, the Commissioner is directed to subtract the amounts 

awarded for EAJA and administrative fees and send Plaintiff’s attorney the balance of $1,163.93, 

less any applicable processing or user fees prescribed by statute. Any amount withheld after all 

administrative and court attorney fees are paid should be released to the claimant. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this ____ day of __________________ 20___.

___________________________________

YOULEE YIM YOU

United States Magistrate Judge

Proposed Order submitted by:

Katherine L. Eitenmiller

HARDER, WELLS, BARON & MANNING, P.C.

474 Willamette Street

Eugene, OR 97401

(541) 686-1969

keitenmiller@hwbm.net

Of Attorneys for Plaintiff

21st December 17

/s/Youlee Yim You
#### MOST v. McARDLE.

(Superior Court of New York City, General Term.

December 18, 1895.)

Action by Albert Most against John MeArdle.

R. J. Mahon, for plaintiff.

R. M. Williams, for defendant.

GILDERSLEEVE, J.

This appeal is from a judgment rendered at special term, dismissing the complaint on the merits. The action was brought in equity for a rescission of a settlement of indebtedness owing by respondent to appellant upon the ground of fraud, alleged to have been perpetrated by the respondent in procuring the settlement. A careful examination of the record fails to disclose any errors of law. The conclusions of fact reached by the learned trial judge are fully supported by the evidence, and the judgment should not be disturbed. Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent.
Page 1 - PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS CASE 

Loren W. Collins, OSB 82221

Email: lorencollins2014@outlook.com

Loren Collins P.C. 

388 State St., Ste. 615

Salem, OR 97301

Tel. 971.273.0427

Facsimile 503.689.1493

Attorney for Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

MEDFORD DIVISION

SUSAN BLAKE,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CURRY HEALTH DISTRICT, ANDREW 

BAIR in his individual capacity, LORA 

MAXWELL in her individual capacity, 

PAMELA BROWN in her individual 

capacity, TERRI TOMBERLIN in her 

individual capacity,

Defendants.

Civil No. 1:14-cv-01559-MC

PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO 

DISMISS CASE WITH PREJUDICE AND 

WITHOUT COSTS 

Pursuant to an agreement between the parties, Plaintiff, by and through her

attorney Loren W. Collins, hereby moves the Court to dismiss the above-captioned case 

with prejudice and without the imposition of costs to any party.

DATED: October 12, 2016

By: /s/Loren W. Collins 

Loren W. Collins, OSB #822213

Loren Collins P.C. 

388 State St., Ste. 615

Salem, OR 97301

(971)273-0427

lorencollins2014@outlook.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

Case 1:14-cv-01559-MC Document 58 Filed 10/12/16 Page 1 of 1
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Healthy Body Weight Research: Grand Forks, ND
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Grand Forks, North Dakota Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center Healthy Body Weight Research Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Collaborations The Healthy Body Weight Research has a long and productive history of collaborative research involving stakeholders.  Current collaborators and projects:  Community Nutrition and Physical Activity Program  Preparation and Presentation of Indigenous Foods  Clinical Research Human Obesity Prevention Research


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
MANDATE

Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-14-00505-CR

DANIEL DESANTIAGO-CARAZA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from the 240th District Court of Fort Bend County. (Tr. Ct. No. 12-DCR059402).

TO THE 240TH DISTRICT COURT OF FORT BEND COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before this Court, on the 7th day of July 2015, the case upon appeal to revise or to 

reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed 

by the trial court on May 30, 2015. After submitting the case 

on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by 

the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s judgment 

contains no reversible error. Accordingly, the Court affirms

the trial court’s judgment.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below 

for observance.

Judgment rendered July 7, 2015.
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley 

and Massengale. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Radack.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court 

in this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

September 18, 2015 

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

 CLERK OF THE COURT
tlnd_20200331_Ex_10_3


		
			Exhibit 10.3
		

		
			English Summary of the First Amendment to the Lease Agreement dated March 2, 2020 by and between Monceau Investissements Immobiliers and Talend S.A. (“Talend”). 
		

		
			 
		

		
			The parties hereby agree to the following:
		

		
			 
		

			
	
			
				 a.
			

			
	
			
			Duration and starting date 




		
			In compliance with the French Commercial Code, the commercial lease duration is 9 years and shall start on July 1st, 2020 and terminate on June 30, 2029. Talend holds the possibility to terminate the Lease at the expiration of a 6-year period i.e. June 30, 2026, subject to 6-month prior notice.
		

		
			 
		

			
	
			
				 b.
			

			
	
			
			Rent




		
			Annual rent is €1,365,840.00 VAT and charges excluded, payable on a quarterly basis, each January 1st, April 1st, July 1st and October 1st. 
		

		
			 
		

		
			A 14-month rent exemption has been agreed between the Parties, i.e. the first rent will be paid on September 1, 2021. 
		

		
			 
		

		
			All other clauses and provisions of the Original Lease and subsequent amendments remain unchanged.
		

		
			 
		

		
			***
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1926 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 673
105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1926

                For the relief of Regine Beatie Edwards.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 2, 1998

 Mr. Grassley introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

            October 1 (legislative day, September 29), 1998

                Reported by Mr. Hatch, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                For the relief of Regine Beatie Edwards.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLASSIFICATION AS A CHILD UNDER THE IMMIGRATION AND 
              NATIONALITY ACT.

    (a) In General.--In the administration of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act, Regine Beatie Edwards shall be classified as a child 
within the meaning of section 101(b)(1)(E) of such Act, upon approval 
of a petition filed on her behalf by Stan Edwards, a citizen of the 
United States, pursuant to section 204 of such Act.
    (b) Limitation.--No natural parent, brother, or sister, if any, of 
Regine Beatie Edwards shall, by virtue of such relationship, be 
accorded any right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and 
Nationality Act.
                                     

                                                       Calendar No. 673

105th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1926

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

                For the relief of Regine Beatie Edwards.

_______________________________________________________________________

            October 1 (legislative day, September 29), 1998

                       Reported without amendment
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                       5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0001000686
<NAME>                          North American Resorts, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                      1
<CURRENCY>                                               US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                            MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                   1
<CASH>                                                            0
<SECURITIES>                                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                     0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                  0
<PP&E>                                                            0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                    0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                             0
<BONDS>                                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                             0
<PREFERRED>                                                       0
<COMMON>                                                     105777
<OTHER-SE>                                                  (105777)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                      0
<SALES>                                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                  0
<CGS>                                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 14167
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              (14167)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          (14167)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                   0
<CHANGES>                                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 (14167)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     0



</TABLE>