alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2





                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 of Flowers Industries, Inc.(No. 33-34855, No. 33-91198
and No. 333-23351) and in the Prospectus constituting part of the Registration
Statement on Form S-3 of Flowers Industries, Inc.(No.33-34855) of our report
dated February 1, 2000 on page F-2 of the Keebler Foods Company Form 10-K
included as Exhibit 99 of this Form 10-K.




PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Chicago, Illinois
March 30, 2000
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT


TO
18 UNITED STATES C. §1350


(SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Novavax, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the fiscal period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Rahul Singhvi,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:




1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the dates
and periods covered by this Report.




By:
                /s/ Rahul SinghviPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer


Date:
August 6, 2010
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Northern Great Plains Research Laboratory: Mandan, ND
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Employment
                        Work With Us
                                    ARS Vacancies at USDAJOBS
                    Local News
                        INTEGRATOR
                                    Bottom Line Ag SummitSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Mandan, North Dakota Northern Great Plains Research Laboratory Docs





- Research Scientists
- Research Programs and Projects at this Location

Dr. Dave Archer's Presentationheadline bar Crop Sequence EconomicsIf the video doesn't automatically play after 5 seconds, click the play button.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
# C_2006093EN.01000601.xml

| 21.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/6

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2006/C 93/04)

| 1. | As provided for in Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 (1) on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community, the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below. |
| --- | --- |

1.

As provided for in Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 (1) on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community, the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Community producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury.

Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Community producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Community producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Division B-1), J-79 5/16, B-1049 Brussels (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

| 4. | This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995. |
| --- | --- |

4.

This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Urea | Belarus
  Bulgaria
  Croatia
  Libya
  Romania
  Ukraine | Anti-dumping duty | Council Regulation (EC) No 92/2002 (OJ L 17, 19.1.2002, p. 1) as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2006 (OJ L 12, 18.1.2006, p. 1) | 20.1.2007 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry

Urea

Belarus

Bulgaria

Croatia

Libya

Romania

Ukraine

Anti-dumping duty

Council Regulation (EC) No 92/2002 (OJ L 17, 19.1.2002, p. 1) as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2006 (OJ L 12, 18.1.2006, p. 1)

20.1.2007

---

(1)  OJ L 56, 6.3.1996, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 2117/2005 (OJ L 340, 23.12.2005, p. 17).

1

(2)  Telefax : (32-2) 295 65 05.

2

---
#### Virgil G. LAWTON, Claimant-Appellant, v. R. James NICHOLSON, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 2007-7094.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

June 28, 2007.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of Virgil G. Lawton’s unopposed motion to dismiss his appeal,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted.

(2) All sides shall bear their own costs.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Ames, Iowa
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home People & Locations







Jennifer  Vawter
                        Location Support Staff

                        




                        
                        Administrative Assistant
                        Phone: (515) 337-7951
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Omar MILLIGAN, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 06-8016.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 31, 2007.

Decided: June 5, 2007.

Omar Milligan, Appellant Pro Se. Stanley D. Ragsdale, Office of the United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Omar Milligan seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion as successive. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Milligan has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
EXHIBIT 23.1
                                  ------------

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
               ---------------------------------------------------

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statements on Form
S-8 (File No.  333-40592)  for The North American  Resorts,  Inc. 2000 Qualified
Stock  Option  Plan and Form S-8 (File  No.  333-40594)  for The North  American
Resorts,  Inc. 2000 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan of our accompanying report in
Form 10- QSB/A dated July 12,  2000,  relating  to the  balance  sheets of North
American Resorts,  Inc. as of June 30, 2000 and 1999 and the related  statements
of operations and  comprehensive  income for the six and three months ended June
30, 2000 and 1999 and the statements of cash flows for the six months ended June
30, 2000 and 1999, respectively.

                                                         S. W. HATFIELD, CPA
Dallas, Texas
July 24, 2000








                                                                              14
EXHIBIT 99.2


STATEMENT UNDER OATH OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
OFFICER REGARDING FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES RELATING TO EXCHANGE ACT FILINGS


I, John D. Johnson, state and attest that:

         1)       To the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the
                  covered reports of Cenex Harvest States Cooperatives, and,
                  except as corrected or supplemented in a subsequent covered
                  report:

                  o        no covered report contained an untrue statement of a
                           material fact as of the end of the period covered by
                           such report (or in the case of a report of Form 8-K
                           or definitive proxy materials, as of the date on
                           which it was filed); and

                  o        no covered report omitted to state material fact
                           necessary to make the statements in the covered
                           report, in light of the circumstances under which
                           they were made, not misleading as of the end of the
                           period covered by such report (or in the case of a
                           report on Form 8-K or definitive proxy materials, as
                           of the date on which it was filed).

         2)       I have reviewed the contents of this statement with the Cenex
                  Harvest Sates Cooperatives audit committee.

         3)       In this statement under oath, each of the following, if filed
                  on or before the date of this statement, is a "covered
                  report":

                  o        August 31, 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cenex
                           Harvest States Cooperatives;

                  o        all reports on Form 10-Q, all reports on Form 8-K and
                           all definitive proxy materials of Cenex Harvest
                           States Cooperatives filed with the Commission
                           subsequent to the filing of the Form 10-K identified
                           above; and

                  o        any amendments to any of the foregoing.



  /s/ John D. Johnson                     Subscribed and sworn to before me this
----------------------------              19th day of November 2002
John D. Johnson
President and Chief Executive Officer



11/19/02  Date                            /s/ Nanci L. Lilja
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Notary Public

                                          My Commission Expires:

                                                 1/31/05
1 - ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

PORTLAND DIVISION

HOLLY A. HANSON,

Plaintiff, No. 03:15-cv-02237-HZ

v. ORDER

NANCY BERRYHILL, 

Commissioner of the Social 

Security Administration

Defendant.

Plaintiff Holly Hanson brought this action seeking review of the Commissioner's final 

decision to deny Disability Insurance Benefits (DIB) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI). 

In a January 12, 2014, Opinion & Order, I reversed the Commissioner's decision, and ordered 

that the case be remanded for further administrative proceedings. Judgment was entered on 

January 12, 2014. In a decision dated October 13, 2017, an Administrative Law Judge found 

Plaintiff disabled as of May 1, 2013, and granted Plaintiff’s application for DIB and SSI benefits.

Pl. Mot. Ex. 4, ECF 26-4.
2 - ORDER

Plaintiff now seeks an award of fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Defendant has no 

objection to the request. I have reviewed the record in the case, the motion, and the supporting 

materials including the award of benefits, the fee agreement with counsel, and the recitation of 

counsel's hours and services. Applying the standards set by Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 

796 (2002), I find the requested fees reasonable.

I grant the motion [26] and award Plaintiff's counsel $9,396.67 in attorney's fees under 42 

U.S.C. § 406(b). Previously, I awarded Plaintiff attorney's fees in the amount of $2,192.95 under 

the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. When issuing the section 406(b) 

check for payment to Plaintiff’s attorney, the Commissioner is directed to subtract the amount 

previously awarded under EAJA and send Plaintiff’s attorney the balance of $7,203.72, less any 

applicable processing fees as allowed by statute. Any amount withheld after all administrative 

and court attorney's fees are paid should be released to the claimant.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated this day of March, 2018

 

Marco A. Hernandez

United States District Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1926 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1926

                For the relief of Regine Beatie Edwards.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 2, 1998

 Mr. Grassley introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                For the relief of Regine Beatie Edwards.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLASSIFICATION AS A CHILD UNDER THE IMMIGRATION AND 
              NATIONALITY ACT.

    (a) In General.--In the administration of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act, Regine Beatie Edwards shall be classified as a child 
within the meaning of section 101(b)(1)(E) of such Act, upon approval 
of a petition filed on her behalf by Stan Edwards, a citizen of the 
United States, pursuant to section 204 of such Act.
    (b) Limitation.--No natural parent, brother, or sister, if any, of 
Regine Beatie Edwards shall, by virtue of such relationship, be 
accorded any right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and 
Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
No. 83321 

# MI= AUG 1 L 

## 2021

À. BROWN CLE PREME DEPUTY CLERK BY IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
WILBERT ROY HOLMES, Appellant, vs. CAPUCINE YOLANDA HOLMES, Respondent.

01?DER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from the district court's minute order resolving various motions. Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; Heidi Almase, Judge.

Initial review of the notice of appeal and documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. The district court's minute order is not effective and cannot be appealed. See State, Div. of Child & Family Servs. v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 445, 454, 92 P.3d 1239, 1245 (2004) ([D]ispositional court orders that are not administrative in nature, but deal with the procedural posture or merits of the underlying controversy, must be written, signed, and filed before they become effective."); Rust v. Clark Cty. Sch. Dist., 103 Nev. 686, 689, 747 P.2d 1380, 1382 (1987) (stating that the district court's minute order is ineffective and cannot be appealed). To the extent, if any that appellant appeals from the August 10, 2021, order granting motion for sanctions, that order likewise cannot be appealed. The order merely directs respondent's attorney to file a memorandum of fees and costs and indicates that the court will thereafter enter an order awarding the fees and costs as a sanction. Because the order does not actually provide for an award of fees and costs, this appeal is premature as 

## 2,1 - 21-5 1 1 SUPREME COURT OP NEVADA tth I947A aligg9DSilver

to that order. See NRAP 3A(b)(8). Accordingly, it appears that this court lacks jurisdiction, and this court.

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

, Stiglich

cc: Hon. Heidi Almase, District Judge, Family Court Division Wilbert Roy Holmes Heaton Fontano, Ltd. Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT Of NEVADA (01 1947A atetilx , 2 e-4,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0345

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JUDSON LEE BROWN,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including March 21, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 11 2022

02/11/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0345
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2068 Referral Instructions Senate (RIS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2068

 A bill to clarify the application of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 
                    of 1995, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 12, 1998

Mr. Thompson (for himself and Mr. Glenn) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred jointly pursuant to the order of 
   August 4, 1977, to the Committees on the Budget and Governmental 
  Affairs, with instructions that if one Committee reports, the other 
         Committee have thirty days to report or be discharged

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 A bill to clarify the application of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 
                    of 1995, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FEDERAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL MANDATE.

    Section 421(5)(B) of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment 
Control Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 658(5)(B)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``the provision'' after ``if'';
            (2) in clause (i)(I) by inserting ``the provision'' before 
        ``would'';
            (3) in clause (i)(II) by inserting ``the provision'' before 
        ``would''; and
            (4) in clause (ii)--
                    (A) by inserting ``that legislation, statute, or 
                regulation does not provide'' before ``the State''; and
                    (B) by striking ``lack'' and inserting ``new or 
                expanded''.
                                 <all>
```