alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Environmental Microbial & Food Safety Laboratory: Beltsville, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    About Us
                        Mission, Facilities, and Expertise
                                    Five Appropriated Projects
                                    Research Staff (by project group)Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Beltsville, Maryland (BARC) Beltsville Agricultural Research Center Environmental Microbial & Food Safety Laboratory People & Locations







Grishma  Prabhukhot
                        Environmental Microbial & Food Safety Laboratory

                        




                        
                        Graduate Student
                        Phone: (301) 504-8989
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1872

To prohibit new welfare for politicians.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 26, 1998

Mr. NICKLES introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To prohibit new welfare for politicians.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TILE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘New Welfare for Politi5 cians Prohibition Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION.

7 None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made

8 available to the Federal Communications Commission may

9 be expended to impose or enforce any requirement or obli10 gation with respect to the provision of free or discounted

11 television broadcast time for campaign advertising unless
2

S 1872 IS

1 such requirement or obligation is specifically and expressly

2 authorized by title III of the Communications Act of 1934.

Æ
(November 12, 1986)

#### In the Matter of Victor P. Zodda, a Suspended Attorney, Petitioner.

Motion granted, suspension vacated. Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Thompson, Bracken and Spatt, JJ., concur.
Michael H. Bloom, OSB# 815106

bloompc@easystreet.net

Michael H. Bloom, P.C.

One Centerpointe Drive, Ste. 570

Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035

Telephone: (503)223-2608

Facsimile: (503) 670-7683

Attorney for Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON

PORTLAND DIVISION

GERALD H. WILLIAMS, JR. and Case No.: 3:15 cv 196

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING

MANAGEMENT RESEARCH, INC.

Plaintiffs, STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL

v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE

F.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(l)(ii)

THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant,

v.

UNIVERSITAS EDUCATION, LLC

and GRIST MILL TRUST WELFARE

BENEFIT PLAN,

Third-Party Defendants.

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(l)(ii), the parties hereby

Page 1- STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

F.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(l)(ii)

Case 3:15-cv-00196-MO Document 46 Filed 12/11/15 Page 1 of 2
stipulate that this case shall be dismissed without prejudice and without costs or

fees to any party.

DATED Ms/^ day of December, 2015.

MICHAEL H. BLOOM, P.C

Michael H. Bloom, OSB #815106

Attorney for Plaintiffs

DATED this' // day of December, 2015.

BULLIVANT HOUSER BAILEY PC

"■"»..

Ronald J. ClarkTDSB #880328

Attorney for The Lincoln National

Life Insurance Company

DATED this day of December, 2015.

Law Office of Michael A. Cox

^Michael A. Cox, OSB #935070

Attorney for Gristmill Trust Welfare

Benefit Plan

Page 2- STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

F.R.Gv.P. ()

Case 3:15-cv-00196-MO Document 46 Filed 12/11/15 Page 2 of 2
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Fort Pierce, Florida
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Fort Pierce, Florida People & Locations







Dave  Lindsey
                        Fort Pierce, Florida

                        




                        
                        BIOLOGICAL SCIENCE TECHNICIAN
                        Phone:    
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice Page 1

Revised March 2018

SCOTT ERIK ASPHAUG, OSB #833674

United States Attorney

District of Oregon

QUINN P. HARRINGTON, OSB #083544

Assistant United States Attorney

Quinn.Harrington@usdoj.gov

1000 SW Third Avenue, Suite 600 

Portland, OR 97204-2902

Telephone: (503) 727-1000

Attorneys for United States of America

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

DAN HEINE,

Defendant.

3:15-cr-00238-SI-1

GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO 

DISMISS DAN HEINE FROM 

INDICTMENTS, WITH PREJUDICE

Rule 48(a) Fed. R. Crim. P.

In the interests of justice, the United States moves to dismiss Defendant Dan Heine from 

all indictments in the above-captioned case, with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 48(a), Fed. R. Crim. 

P.

Dated: January 20, 2022 Respectfully submitted,

SCOTT ERIK ASPHAUG

United States Attorney

/s/ Quinn P. Harrington

QUINN P. HARRINGTON, OSB #083544

Assistant United States Attorney
Exhibit
32.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of ARC Wireless Solutions,
Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jason
Young, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:
 
 (1) 
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2) 
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 
 Date:
April 30, 2010
  By:
                /s/
      Jason YoungName:   
      Jason YoungTitle:     
      Principal Executive Officer
# EUR-Lex - 52006AP0531 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52006AP0531

**European Parliament decision on the nomination of Nadezhda Sandolova as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C6-0411/2006 - 2006/0811(CNS)) **

*
Official Journal 317 E , 23/12/2006 P. 0059 - 0060 *

20061223

P6_TA(2006)0531

Nomination of the Bulgarian Member of the Court of Auditors

European Parliament decision on the nomination of Nadezhda Sandolova as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C6-0411/2006 — 2006/0811(CNS))

The European Parliament,

- having regard to Article 247(3) of the EC Treaty and Article 160b(3) of the Euratom Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0411/2006),

- whereas at its meeting of 28 November 2006 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council's nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors, and considered the nominee's qualifications in the light of the criteria laid down by Articles 247(2) of the EC Treaty and 160b(2) of the Euratom Treaty,

- having regard to Rule 101 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A6-0442/2006);

1. Delivers a favourable opinion on the nomination of Nadezhda Sandolova as a Member of the Court of Auditors;

2. Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Communities and the audit offices of the Member States.

--------------------------------------------------
PAGE 1 – THIRD MOTION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING HEARING DATE

Ruben L. Iñiguez

Assistant Federal Public Defender

101 S.W. Main Street, Suite 1700

Portland, Oregon 97204

(503) 326-2123 Telephone

(503) 326-5524 Facsimile

ruben_iniguez@fd.org

Attorney for Defendant

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

WINSTON SHROUT,

Defendant.

Case No. 3:15-cr-00438-JO

THIRD MOTION TO CONTINUE 

SENTENCING HEARING DATE

The defendant, Winston Shrout, through counsel, Ruben L. Iñiguez, moves the 

Court to enter an Order continuing the current sentencing hearing date for 90 days (i.e., 

until May 21, 2018). Sentencing is currently scheduled for February 20, 2018. ECF 122. 

Case 3:15-cr-00438-JO Document 123 Filed 01/23/18 Page 1 of 2
PAGE 2 – THIRD MOTION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING HEARING DATE

This motion constitutes Mr. Shrout’s third request to continue the sentencing hearing

date. See ECF 117 and 121.1

The underlying bases supporting this motion are set forth in the Ex Parte

Declaration of Counsel filed contemporaneously herewith.

The U.S. Probation Office, through Theresa Fuchs, does not oppose this motion. 

The government, through its lead counsel, Stuart A. Wexler, Trial Attorney, Tax Division, 

indicates it “would generally oppose any motion to continue sentencing at this stage 

without further details regarding the basis of the motion.”

RESPECTFULLY submitted this 23rd day of January, 2018.

/s/ Ruben L. Iñiguez

Ruben L. Iñiguez

Assistant Federal Public Defender

 1 The government first requested a continuance of the initial sentencing hearing date. Neither Mr. 

Shrout nor the Probation Office opposed the request. The Court granted the government’s request and 

continued the hearing until September 26, 2017. CR 116. Mr. Shrout subsequently moved for a 

continuance. ECF 117. Neither the government nor the Probation Office opposed it. The Court granted 

his motion and continued the hearing until January 9, 2018. CR 119. Mr. Shrout then moved for a second 

continuance. ECF 121. Neither the government nor the Probation Office opposed the motion. Id. The 

Court granted the unopposed motion and continued the hearing until February 20, 2018. CR 122.

Case 3:15-cr-00438-JO Document 123 Filed 01/23/18 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of eTotalSource, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Frank J. Orlando,
      Chief Restructuring Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
      as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
      of my knowledge:





1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:
      April 17, 2007


/s/
      Frank
      J. Orlando


Frank
      J.
      Orlando


Principal
      Executive Officer


(Chief
      Restructuring Officer)
#### Ernst Albrecht *et al. vs.*City of St. Paul *et al.*

Submitted on briefs Nov. 29, 1893.

Affirmed Jan. 2, 1894.

No. 8523.

Insufficient assignment of errors.

The assignments of error made by counsel for appellants in this case are insufficient to raise or present any question for determination.

Appeal by plaintiffs, Ernst Albrecht and two hundred and fifteen others, from a judgment of the District Court of Bamsey County, *Chas. E. Otis,*J., entered October 19, 1892, that they take nothing by their action.

This suit was commenced January 26, 1891, against the City of St. Paul and George Bies, City Treasurer, defendants, to restrain the levy and collection of an assessment upon the property of the plaintiffs for the construction of a bridge and approaches on Selby Avenue over the tracks and right of way of the Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Bailway Company, costing $90,646.73. The plaiiftiffs claimed the bridge was in fact for the use and benefit of Selby Avenue Cable Line belonging to the St. Paul City Bailway Company, and was in no sense a local or public improvement, that the assessment was in several particulars illegal and they prayed judgment enjoining its collection. The defendants, by their answer denied various allegations of the complaint, and then set forth in detail all the steps in the proceeding to levy and collect the assessment, comprising more than ten folios of affirmative statements. The issues were tried February 10, 1892, and the Court made findings that all the affirmative allegations in the answer are true, and directed judgment that plaintiffs are not entitled to any relief in the action and that they pay the costs. Judgment *100was so entered and plaintiffs appeal. Here they assign errors as follows:

1st. The Court below erred in finding the affirmative allegations of the answer to be true.

2nd. The Court below erred in finding as conclusion of law that plaintiffs are not entitled to any relief in this action.

*John W. White*and *F. W. Root,*for appellants.

*Leon T. Chamberlain*and *H. W. Phillips,*for respondents.

Collins, J.

Plaintiffs’ first assignment of error is not only too general to indicate in what particular the finding of fact complained of is erroneous, but it covers many facts which were not only alleged in the complaint, but, after being set out with much detail in the answer, were expressly admitted in the reply. It does not reach that part of the findings of fact attacked in appellants’ brief whereby the court found that the allegations of the complaint respecting the real character and purpose of the improvements, and that they were actually made for a private, and not a public, use, were untrue. If the findings of fact remain intact, it follows that there is nothing in the second assignment of error as to the conclusions of law.

Judgment affirmed.

(Opinion published 57 N. "W. Rep. 330.)
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2023

To provide increased penalties for drug offenses involving minors.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 1, 1998

Mr. ASHCROFT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To provide increased penalties for drug offenses involving

minors.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protect Our Children

5 Act of 1998’’.

6 SEC. 2. INCREASED PENALTIES FOR DISTRIBUTING DRUGS

7 TO MINORS.

8 Section 418 of the Controlled Substances Act (21

9 U.S.C. 859) is amended—

10 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘one year’’

11 and inserting ‘‘3 years’’; and
2

•S 2023 IS

1 (2) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘one year’’

2 and inserting ‘‘5 years’’.

3 SEC. 3. INCREASED PENALTY FOR DRUG TRAFFICKING IN

4 OR NEAR A SCHOOL OR OTHER PROTECTED

5 LOCATION.

6 Section 419 of the Controlled Substances Act (21

7 U.S.C. 860) is amended—

8 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘one year’’

9 and inserting ‘‘3 years’’; and

10 (2) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘three years’’

11 each place that term appears and inserting ‘‘5

12 years’’.

13 SEC. 4. INCREASED PENALTIES FOR USING MINORS TO DIS14 TRIBUTE DRUGS.

15 Section 420 of the Controlled Substances Act (21

16 U.S.C. 861) is amended—

17 (1) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘one year’’

18 and inserting ‘‘3 years’’; and

19 (2) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘one year’’

20 and inserting ‘‘5 years’’.

21 SEC. 5. USE OF MINORS IN CRIMES OF VIOLENCE.

22 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 1 of title 18, United

23 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the follow24 ing:
3

•S 2023 IS

1 ‘‘§ 25. Use of minors in crimes of violence

2 ‘‘(a) PENALTIES.—Except as otherwise provided by

3 law, whoever, being not less than 18 years of age, know4 ingly and intentionally uses a minor to commit a crime

5 of violence, or to assist in avoiding detection or apprehen6 sion for a crime of violence, shall—

7 ‘‘(1) be subject to 2 times the maximum impris8 onment and 2 times the maximum fine for the crime

9 of violence; and

10 ‘‘(2) for second or subsequent convictions under

11 this subsection, be subject to 3 times the maximum

12 imprisonment and 3 times the maximum fine other13 wise provided for the crime of violence in which the

14 minor is used.

15 ‘‘(b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section:

16 ‘‘(1) CRIME OF VIOLENCE.—The term ‘crime of

17 violence’ has the same meaning as in section 16.

18 ‘‘(2) MINOR.—The term ‘minor’ means a per19 son who is less than 18 years of age.

20 ‘‘(3) USES.—The term ‘uses’ means employs,

21 hires, persuades, induces, entices, or coerces.’’.

22 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The analysis for

23 chapter 1 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by

24 adding at the end the following:

‘‘25. Use of minors in crimes of violence.’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                        5
<LEGEND>
     Appendix A to Item 601(c) of Regulation S-B
</LEGEND>

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                              330,586
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     3,695,117
<ALLOWANCES>                                        235,000
<INVENTORY>                                       2,602,250
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  6,443,878
<PP&E>                                            2,270,452
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1,691,231
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    8,731,394
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             4,054,438
<BONDS>                                              21,409
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                            125,496
<OTHER-SE>                                        4,202,144
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      8,731,394
<SALES>                                           7,434,975
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  7,434,975
<CGS>                                             4,148,452
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2,713,447
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   85,563
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     487,513
<INCOME-TAX>                                          8,058
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 479,455
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                        479,455
<EPS-BASIC>                                           .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           .04



</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

Cause No. DA-2020-0247 

ORDER ON UNOPPOSED MOTION 

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE 

ANSWER BRIEF

ROBERT MAFFIT, and the 

MONTANA INDEPENDENT LIVING

PROJECT, INC., a Montana Non-Profit 

Corporation, 

Plaintiffs/Appellants,

v.

CITY OF HELENA, and JOHN DOES 1-

XXX

Defendant/Appellee.

Appellee having moved this Court for an unopposed extension of time to file answer brief

and for good cause shown, it is hereby ordered that the Appellee’s answer brief be due on or 

before October 5, 2020.

DATED _____ day of August, 2020. 

__________________________ 

SUPREME COURT JUSTICE

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

August 31 2020

08/31/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0247