alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.11


 


STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT


 


This Stock Purchase Agreement is dated as of this 25" day
of March, 2019 by and between Matthew Wolfson (the ASeller”) and Petar Gajic (the “Buyer’).


 


WHEREAS, the Buyer is an employee of Electromedical Technologies,
Inc., a Delaware company (the “Company”); and


 


WHEREAS, previously, the Seller had orally agreed to sell 500,000
of his shares of the Company (the “Shares”) to the Buyer for the par price per share which Seller paid for his shares
of the Company; and


 


WHEREAS, the Seller and Buyer agree that it is in their best
interest to memorialize in writing the sale of the Shares.


 


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of
the mutual promises, covenants, representations and warranties contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration,
and with the intent that, upon consummation of the transactions contemplated herein, and upon the terms set forth herein the
parties hereby agree to as follows:


 


	1.	The Seller agrees to sell, and Buyer agrees to purchase, the Shares for $50.00.



 


	2.	Seller represents that he has good and marketable title to the Shares. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement
as of the date



 


first written above.


 


SELLER: MATTHEW WOLSON BUYER: PETAR GAJIC.


 


Mathew fson Petar Gajic


 


11-ZU1U


 


Yur I-JIU45


 


Notice to Purchaser - In the event that this check is lost,
misplaced or Cashier's Check - Customer Copy


 


stolen, a sworn statement and 90-day waiting period will be
required prior to replacement This check should be negotiated within 90 days


 


Void After 90 Days


 





                                                                     


 


                                                        


 


Fifty and 00/100 Dollars ToThe MATTHEW WOLFSON


 






     


     


    

 


Order Of 500,000 SHARES PURCHASE Remitter (Purchased By): PETAR
GAJIC


 


Bank of America, N.A. PHOENIX, AZ
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Northern Great Plains Research Laboratory: Mandan, ND
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Employment
                        Work With Us
                                    ARS Vacancies at USDAJOBS
                    Local News
                        INTEGRATOR
                                    Bottom Line Ag SummitSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Mandan, North Dakota Northern Great Plains Research Laboratory Docs





- Northern Great Plains Integrator
- NGPRL Recycled Materials
- AgroEcosystem Performance Assessment Tool
- Crop Sequence Calculator
- Cover Crop Chart
- Request a Reprint of a Publication
- EEO / Civil Rights / Diversity

Email Request Copy of Integratorheadline bar The Integrator is published twice a year.  Send request to: click here


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2171 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 527
105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2171

                          [Report No. 105-290]

 To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act applicable to the 
   construction of a hydroelectric project in the State of Arkansas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 16, 1998

  Mr. Bumpers introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

                            August 25, 1998

 Reported under authority of the order of the Senate of July 31, 1998, 
                  by Mr. Murkowski, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act applicable to the 
   construction of a hydroelectric project in the State of Arkansas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINES.

    Notwithstanding the time limitations of section 13 of the Federal 
Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806), the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 
upon the request of the licensee for FERC Project No. 10455 (and after 
reasonable notice), is authorized, in accordance with the good faith, 
due diligence and public interest requirements of section 13 and the 
Commission's procedures under such section, to extend the time required 
for commencement of construction of the project for up to a maximum of 
three consecutive two-year periods. This section shall take effect for 
the project upon the expiration of the extension (issued by the 
Commission under section 13) of the period required for commencement of 
such project.
                                     

                                                       Calendar No. 527

105th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2171

                          [Report No. 105-290]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act applicable to the 
   construction of a hydroelectric project in the State of Arkansas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            August 25, 1998

 Reported under authority of the order of the Senate of July 31, 1998, 
                  by Mr. Murkowski, without amendment
```
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA , Respondent ,

v.
ROBERT RICHARD SPURLING, III , Petitioner

.

No. 1 CA

- CR 21

- 0436 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Coconino County No. CR 2008

- 0672 The Honorable Cathleen Brown Nichols , Judge
REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Coconino County Attorney ’ s Office , Flagstaff By William P. Ring Counsel for Respondent Robert Richard Spurling, III , Florence Petitioner FILED 5-31-2022STATE v. SPURLING Decision of the Court

2 MEMORANDUM DECISION Presiding Judge Cynthia J. Bailey, Judge Peter B. Swann and Judge D. Steven Williams delivered the decision of the Court.

PER CURIAM : ¶1 Petitioner Robert Richard Spurling seeks review of the superior court’s order denying his petition for post

- conviction relief

. This is petitioner’s second successive petition. ¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post

- conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19, 278 P.3d 1276, 1280 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post

- conviction relief. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1, 260 P.3d 1102, 1103 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review). ¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court’s order denying the petition for post

- conviction relief, a nd the petition for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion. ¶4 We grant review and deny relief.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-51201 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus APOLONIO PASTRANO, also known as Polo, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-99-CV-380 SA-93-CR-184-2

-------------------- December 12, 2002 Before JOLLY, JONES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Apolonio Pastrano, federal prisoner # 65249-080, is appealing the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion challenging his conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana. Relying on Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), he argues that his conviction should be set aside because the quantity of drugs upon which he wasNo. 99-51201 -2- sentenced was not alleged in the indictment and was not submitted to the jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.
In United States v. Brown , 305 F.3d 304, 305-09 (5th Cir. 2002), a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 case, the court determined that the new rule of criminal procedure announced in Apprendi does not apply retroactively on collateral review of initial 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motions. Therefore, Pastrano’s argument based on Apprendi fails. The district court’s denial of Pastrano’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion is AFFIRMED. The Government’s motion for a summary affirmance is DENIED.
----

**EXHIBIT      32**

**CERTIFICATION**

|                                                                |                                                |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:                November                9,                2005 | /s/                George W. Haligowski             |   |
|                                                                | George                W. Haligowski                 |   |
|                                                                | Chairman                of the Board, President and |   |
|                                                                | Chief                Executive Officer              |   |

| Date:                November 9, 2005 | /s/                Timothy M. Doyle            |   |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                  | Timothy                M. Doyle                |   |
|                                  | Executive                Managing Director and |   |
|                                  | Chief                Financial Officer         |   |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1
<CURRENCY>                                U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       2,677,636
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,494,013
<ALLOWANCES>                                    67,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,924,376
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,367,884
<PP&E>                                       1,332,967
<DEPRECIATION>                                 190,939
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,182,144
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          567,273
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          7
<COMMON>                                       231,353
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,383,511
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,182,144
<SALES>                                      6,530,022
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,530,022
<CGS>                                        4,648,735
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,648,735
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,038
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,472,879)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,472,879)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,472,879)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
                                             

</TABLE>
### IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

DIVISION II

In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of

RANDY PHILIP CAPPS

,

Petitioner. No . 53980

- 2

- II

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

G LASGOW

, A.C.J.

— Randy Philip Capps seeks relief from perso nal restraint imposed fol lowing

his 1995 plea of guilty to aggravated first degree murder, a crime he committed when he was 20 years

old and for which he received a sentence of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole

. He argues

that under In re Pers onal Restraint of Monschke , 197 Wn.2d 305, 482 P.3d 276 (2021), his sentence is

unconstitutional and that he is ent itled to be resentenced so that the trial court can take into account his

youthfulness at the time of his crimes. The State conce des that Capps is entitled to resentencing.

Accordingly , we grant Capps ’s petition and remand his judgment and sent ence to the trial court for

resentencing.

A majority of the panel having determined that this opinion will not be printed in the Washington

Appellate Reports, but will be filed for public record in accordance with RCW 2.06.040, it is so ordered.

Glasgow, A.C.J.

We concur:

Maxa, J.

Veljacic, J. Filed

Washington State

Court of Appeals

Division Two

February 8, 2022
PAGE 1 – FINAL JUDGMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

MEMORY INTEGRITY, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

INTEL CORPORATION,

Defendant.

Case No. 3:15-cv-00262-SI

FINAL JUDGMENT

John Mansfield, MANSFIELDLAW, 121 SW Morrison Avenue, Suite 400, Portland, OR 97204; 

Jonathan Baker, Michael Saunders, and Gurtej Singh, FARNEY DANIELS, PC, 411 Borel Avenue, 

Suite 350, San Mateo, CA 94402. Of Attorneys for Plaintiff.

Renée E. Rothauge, MARKOWITZ HERBOLD, PC, 1211 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 3000, Portland, 

OR 97204; Michael J. Summersgill, Jordan L. Hirsch, and Sarah B. Petty, WILMERHALE, LLP, 

60 State Street, Boston, MA 02109; Grant K. Rowan, WILMERHALE, LLP, 1875 Pennsylvania 

Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20006; Arthur W. Coviello, WILMERHALE, LLP, 950 Page Mill 

Road, Palo Alto, CA 94304. Of Attorneys for Defendant.

Michael H. Simon, District Judge.

Pursuant to and for the reasons set forth in the Court’s Opinion and Order granting Intel’s

Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 216), IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

That Final Judgment is hereby entered for Defendant Intel Corporation (“Intel”) and

against Plaintiff Memory Integrity, LLC (“Memory Integrity”) on Memory Integrity’s claims for

Case 3:15-cv-00262-SI Document 223 Filed 04/27/16 Page 1 of 2
PAGE 2 – FINAL JUDGMENT

infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,103,636; 7,107,409; 7,296,121; 8,572,206; and 8,898,254

(Counts I – V of Memory Integrity’s Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. 105));

That Final Judgment is hereby entered for Intel and against Memory Integrity on Intel’s

counterclaim and affirmative defense of non-infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,103,636;

7,107,409; 7,296,121; 8,572,206; and 8,898,254 (Counts I, III, V, VII, and IX of Intel’s

Amended Counterclaims and the Second Affirmative Defense set forth in Intel’s Amended

Answer (Dkt. 121));

That Final Judgment is hereby entered for Intel and against Memory Integrity on Intel’s

counterclaim and affirmative defense that Memory Integrity’s claims that any Intel products

infringe U.S. Patent Nos. 7,103,636; 7,107,409; 7,296,121; 8,572,206; and 8,898,254 are barred

by a covenant not to sue entered into by Intel and Sanmina-SCI Corporation on August 23, 2005

(Count XI of Intel’s Amended Counterclaims and the Seventh Affirmative Defense set forth in

Intel’s Amended Answer (Dkt. 121)); and

That all other claims, counterclaims, defenses, or other matters that have been asserted,

including Intel’s counterclaims of patent invalidity, are dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 27th day of April, 2016.

/s/ Michael H. Simon

Michael H. Simon

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-00262-SI Document 223 Filed 04/27/16 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 3(i)(6)

DEAN HELLER
Secretary of State

202 North Carson Street
Carson City, Nevada 89701-4201
(775) 684 5708


                                 Certificate of
                                    Amendment
                           (PURSUANT TO NRS 78.385 and
                                     78.390)

                                           FILED # C 7460-87
                                           MAY 12 2003
                                           IN THE OFFICE OF
                                           DEAN HELLER
                                           DEAN HELLER SECRETARY OF STATE


              Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation
                         For Nevada Profit Corporations
          (Pursuant to NRS 78.385 and 78.390 - After Issuance of Stock)
                              - Remit in Duplicate-


1. Name of corporation: Palladium Communications, Inc.

2. The articles have been amended as follows (provide article numbers, if
available):

Replace Article I with the following: Effective May 14, 2003, the name of the
corporation is Peak Entertainment Holdings, Inc. and the mailing address of the
principal office is initally c/o J. Bartalotta, 2236 New York Avenue, Scotoh
Plains, New Jersey, 07076.

3. The vote by which the stockholders holding shares in the corporation
entitling them to exercise at least a majority of the voting power, or such
greater proportion of the voting power as may be required in the case of a vote
by classes or series, or as may be required by the provisions of the articles of
incorporation have voted in favor of the amendment is: 87%.*

4. Officer Signature (Required):

/s/ Wilf Shorrocks
Wilf Shorrocks, President

*If any proposed amendment would alter or change any preference or any relative
or other right given to any class or series of outstanding shares, then the
amendment must be approved by the vote, in addition to the affirmative vote
otherwise required, of the holders of shares representing a majority of the
voting power of each class or series affected by the amendment regardless of
limitations or restrictions on the voting power thereof.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs

          - [212A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900253G]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice publishes the approval of Third Amendment to the Tribal-State Compact (Amendment) for Class III Gaming between the Spokane Tribe (Tribe) and the State of Washington (State).

# DATES:

The amendment takes effect on September 1, 2021.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ms. Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of Indian Gaming, Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary—Policy and Economic Development, Washington, DC 20240,                         *paula.hart@bia.gov,*                         (202) 219-4066.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Under section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2701*et seq.,*                     the Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the                     **Federal Register**                     notice of approved Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming activities on Indian lands. As required by 25 CFR 293.4, all compacts and amendments are subject to review and approval by the Secretary. The Amendment authorizes the Tribe to engage in sports wagering at the Tribe's class III gaming facility, updates the Compact to reflect this change in various sections, and                           ( print page 49047)                        incorporates Appendix S, Sports Wagering. The Amendment is approved.                

Bryan Newland,

Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2021-18818 Filed 8-31-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4337-15-P
Order entered January 25, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 18 - 01254 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF K .K., A CHILD On Appeal from the 305th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. JC - 17 - 00489 - X



### O RDER Before the Court is appellee’s January 22, 2019 motion for an extension of time to file a brief. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to February 12, 2019

. /s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE