alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BIOMETRIC
SECURITY CORP. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENT FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> CANADIAN DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  .6787
<CASH>                                         277,403
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   49,241
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               326,644
<PP&E>                                          69,948<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,902
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,035,824
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          250,356
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    16,176,836<F2>
<OTHER-SE>                                (11,048,420)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,035,824
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                60,161
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,193,036
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (164,855)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (968,020)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (968,020)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)
<FN>
<F1>CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES                   5,644,134
<F2>CONTINGENT LIABILITY                       657,052
</FN>


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350

Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer of Nicholas Financial, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended September 30, 2006
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Peter L Vosotas                  
|Peter L. Vosotas                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: November 14, 2006
Exhibit 32.2

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350

Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned Senior Vice President  Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Nicholas Financial, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months
ended June 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                               
|-------------------------------
|/s/ Ralph T Finkenbrink        
|Ralph T. Finkenbrink           
|Senior Vice President  Finance
|and Chief Financial Officer    

Dated: August 14, 2006
1 – ORDER 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

MARY WICKENKAMP, 

Plaintiff, No. 2:15-cv-00483-PK

v. ORDER

DAVID BAUM, et al., 

Defendants. 

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued a Findings & Recommendation [31] on July 24,

2015, recommending that Defendants’ motion to dismiss [12] should be granted and Plaintiff’s 

claims against Defendants should be dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff has timely filed 

objections [33] to the Findings & Recommendation. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). 

When a party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings & 

Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the 
2 – ORDER 

Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th 

Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).

I have carefully considered Plaintiff’s objections and conclude there is no basis to modify 

the Findings & Recommendation. I have also reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de 

novo and find no errors in the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak’s Findings & Recommendation [31], and 

therefore, Defendants’ motion to dismiss [12] is granted, and Plaintiff’s claims are dismissed 

with prejudice. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this _______ day of ____________________, 2015. 

 

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ

United States District Judge
#### SAM BATTAGLIO, *ET AL.,*PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. WILLIAM DRUSS, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

See same case below: 65 *N. J. Super.*185.

*Mr. Pranh Metro*and *Mr. Sam Weiss*for the petitioner.

*Messrs. Novins, Novins & O’Connor*for the respondents.

April 17, 1961.

Denied.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Aerial Application Technology Research: College Station, TX
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area College Station, Texas Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center Aerial Application Technology Research Docs Publications/Reprints







2015 Publicationsheadline bar 1 - Publications/Reprints
               2 - 2010 Publications
                  3 - 2011 Publications
                  4 - 2012 Publications
                  5 - 2013 Publications
                  6 - 2014 Publications
                  7 - 2015 Publications  Evaluating effective swath width and droplet distribution of aerial spraying systems on M-18B and Thrush 510G airplanes Evaluation of selected acaricides against twospotted spider mite (Acari: Tetranychidae) on greenhouse cotton using multispectral data Update to the USDA-ARS Fixed-Wing Spray Nozzle Models Hyperspectral Image Classification for Mapping Agricultural Tillage Practices << Previous

                        1
                        2
                        3
                        4
                        5
                        6
                        [7]


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Report”) of ARC Wireless
Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2009, each of
the undersigned Jason T. Young, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Steven C. Olson, Acting Principal Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of each of the
undersigned’s knowledge and belief:





(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Dated: March
      18, 2010
            /s/ Jason T.
      Young


Jason T.
Young


Principal
Executive Officer








Dated: March
      18, 2010
            /s/ Steven C.
      Olson


Steven C.
Olson, Chief Technology Officer and


Acting
Principal Financial Officer
## Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In re : Steve A. Coston

No. 06

- 17

- 00132

- CR Original Mandamus Proceeding

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice

Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice

Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that Relator is not entitled to the relief

sought. Therefore, we deny the petition.

RENDERED JULY 20 , 2017

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Shawn G. Granger, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[947 NYS2d 924]

Appeal from a judgment of the Jefferson County Court (Kim H. Martusewicz, J.), rendered May 26, 2010. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, assault in the second degree, resisting arrest, harassment in the second degree, unlawfully fleeing an officer in the third degree, reckless endangerment in the second degree, reckless driving and various other traffic infractions.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Same memorandum as in *People v Granger*([appeal No. 1] 96 AD3d 1667 [2012]). Present — Scudder, P.J., Smith, Centra, Lindley and Martoche, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 204 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 204

                  For the relief of Dogan Umut Evans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 28, 1997

  Mr. Inouye introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                  For the relief of Dogan Umut Evans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. IMMEDIATE RELATIVE STATUS FOR DOGAN UMUT EVANS.

    (a) In General.--Dogan Umut Evans shall be classified as a child 
under section 101(b)(1)(F) of the Immigration and Nationality Act for 
purposes of approval of a relative visa petition filed under section 
204 of such Act by his adoptive parent and the filing of an application 
for an immigrant visa or adjustment of status.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Dogan Umut Evans enters the United 
States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), he shall 
be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if 
otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 
245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the petition and the application for 
issuance of an immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of 
status are filed with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Dogan Umut Evans, the 
Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, 
for the current or next following fiscal year, the worldwide level of 
family-sponsored immigrants under section 201(c)(1)(A) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Dogan Umut 
Evans, if any, shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded 
any right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         1133942
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   202192
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1337718
<PP&E>                                        21440929
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                25809385
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2867742
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    22565341
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  25809385
<SALES>                                        5742721
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               8008204
<CGS>                                          5539189
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   163909
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                274283
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2030823
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2030823
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2030823
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    68.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    68.47
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23



                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of ATS Medical, Inc. of our report dated January 31, 2003, included in the 2002
Annual Report to Shareholders of ATS Medical, Inc.

Our audit also included the financial statement schedule of ATS Medical, Inc.
listed in Item 15(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In
our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered
in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly
in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Form S-8 No. 333-55154 pertaining to the ATS Medical, Inc. 2000 Stock
Incentive Plan, Form S-8 No. 333-49985 pertaining to the 1998 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan, Form S-8 Nos. 33-44940 and 333-49985 pertaining to the 1987 Stock
Option and Stock Award Plan of ATS Medical, Inc. (formerly Helix BioCore, Inc.),
Form S-3 No. 333-43360 pertaining to the registration of 2,727,273 shares of ATS
Medical, Inc. common stock, and Form S-3 No. 333-39288 pertaining to the
registration of 1,100,000 shares of ATS Medical, Inc. common stock, of our
report dated January 31, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements incorporated herein by reference, and our report included in the
preceding paragraph with respect to the financial statement schedule included in
the Annual Report (Form 10-K) of ATS Medical, Inc.

                                               /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 20, 2003
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of PacificHealth Laboratories, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Robert Portman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Stephen
P. Kuchen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that based on our knowledge:

1.      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

This Certification shall not be deemed "filed" by the Company for the purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

DATE:  August 15, 2005

By:     /S/ ROBERT PORTMAN
        ------------------
        Robert Portman, Chairman of the Board
        (Principal Executive Officer)

DATE:  August 15, 2005

By:     /S/ STEPHEN P. KUCHEN
        ---------------------
        Stephen P. Kuchen, Chief Financial Officer
        (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


















                                       19
PAGE 1 – ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO REDUCE SENTENCE

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) (COMPASSIONATE 

RELEASE)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

MEDFORD DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

MICHAEL AARON RIVERASEARS,

Defendant.

Case No. 1:14-cr-00458-AA-1

ORDER GRANTING JOINT

MOTION TO REDUCE SENTENCE 

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i)

(COMPASSIONATE RELEASE)

The Court, having considered the parties Joint Motion to Reduce Sentence Pursuant 

to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) (Compassionate Release) [91], hereby GRANTS said 

motion. 

The sentence is hereby reduced to TIME SERVED effective one day after the date 

this Order is signed. 

Case 1:14-cr-00458-AA Document 92 Filed 03/16/22 Page 1 of 2
PAGE 2 – ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO REDUCE SENTENCE

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) (COMPASSIONATE 

RELEASE)

The Court will file an Amended Judgment on the electronic docket. All other terms 

and conditions of the Defendant’s Judgment [82] remain as previously ordered.

DATED this _____ day of ___________________ 2022. 

Ann Aiken 

United States District Court Judge

Submitted by:

/s/ Ryan Costello

Ryan Costello

Attorney for Defendant

16th March

/s/Ann Aiken

Case 1:14-cr-00458-AA Document 92 Filed 03/16/22 Page 2 of 2
Second Amendment to
                    Certificate of Limited Partnership of
                Geodyne Energy Income Limited Partnership II-G


     The  undersigned,  desiring to amend its amended  certificate  of limited
partnership  pursuant to the Oklahoma Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act,
as amended,  Okla.  Stat. tit. 54 (1993),  Section 301 et seq (the "Act"),  do
hereby state:

     1.   The  name  of the  limited  partnership  is  Geodyne  Energy  Income
Limited Partnership II-G.

     2. The date of filing of the original  Certificate  of Limited  Partnership
was April 17, 1989, as amended by the First  Amendment to Certificate of Limited
Partnership of Geodyne Energy Income Limited  Partnership II-G filed on February
25, 1993.

     3.   The Amended  Certificate of Limited Partnership is hereby revised to
change the name of the  General  Partner  and  Registered  Agent from  Geodyne
Properties, Inc. to the following:

              Geodyne Resources, Inc.

Geodyne  Properties,  Inc. merged with Geodyne  Resources,  Inc., with Geodyne
Resources, Inc. surviving, effective June 30, 1996.

     DATED:  July 1, 1996

                                       Geodyne Properties, Inc.
                                       by Geodyne Resources, Inc.,
                                       successor by merger

                                       By:  /s/ Dennis R. Neill
                                            ----------------------------
                                            Dennis R. Neill
                                            President

                                       Geodyne Resources, Inc.
                                       as General Partner


                                       By:  /s/ Dennis R. Neill
                                            ----------------------------
                                            Dennis R. Neill
                                            President



                                      -1-
<PAGE>




                                       Geodyne Depositary Company, as the
                                       Limited Partner


                                       By:  /s/ Dennis R. Neill
                                            ----------------------------
                                            Dennis R. Neill
                                            President

                                       Geodyne Resources, Inc., as
                                       Attorney-in-Fact for all Substituted
                                       Limited Partners


                                       By:  /s/ Dennis R. Neill
                                            ----------------------------
                                            Dennis R. Neill
                                            President


                                      -2-
<PAGE>