AFFIRMED and Opinion Filed June 29, 2021 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00361-CR 

No. 05-20-00362-CR 

No. 05-20-00363-CR 

No. 05-20-00365-CR 

No. 05-20-00366-CR 

No. 05-20-00367-CR 

No. 05-20-00368-CR 

MARCUS JOHNSON-MCBRYDE, Appellant 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court 

Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause Nos. 380-83474-2018; 380-81396-2019; 380-81395-2019; 

199-83250-2018; 199-83247-2018; 199-83246-2018; 199-81278-2018 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Molberg, Goldstein, and Smith 

Opinion by Justice Smith 

Marcus Johnson-McBryde appeals his assault of a public servant, two 

aggravated assaults of a public servant, unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, 

aggravated robbery, evading arrest, and robbery convictions. Appellant’s appointed 

counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), 

stating that the records do not contain any reversible error that was preserved for 

appellate review. Counsel states in the brief that he provided appellant with a copy 
 –2– 

of the brief and counsel’s motion to withdraw and advised appellant of his right to 

examine the appellate records and file a pro se response. In addition, this Court 

notified appellant of his right to examine the appellate records and file a pro se 

response. Appellant did not file a pro se response. 

The procedures established in Anders are applicable where, as here, the 

appellant’s appointed counsel concludes that there are no non-frivolous issues to 

assert on appeal. See In re D.D., 279 S.W.3d 849, 849–50 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2009, 

pet. denied). This Court is not required to address the merits of each claim raised in 

an Anders brief or a pro se response. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2005); In re D.D., 279 S.W.3d at 850. Instead, our duty is to 

determine whether there are any arguable grounds for reversal and, if so, to remand 

the case to the trial court so that new counsel may be appointed to address the issues. 

See In re D.D., 279 S.W.3d at 850. 

In the Anders brief, counsel for appellant presents a professional evaluation 

of the records demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds for reversal and 

concluding that appellant’s appeals are frivolous and without merit. See Anders, 386 

U.S. at 744. We independently reviewed all the records and counsel’s Anders brief 

and agree that the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the 

records that could arguably support the appeals. 

 
 –3– 

Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s judgments. 

Do Not Publish 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b) 

200361F.U05 

 

/Craig Smith/

CRAIG SMITH 

JUSTICE 
 –4– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

MARCUS JOHNSON-MCBRYDE, 

Appellant 

No. 05-20-00361-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 380th Judicial 

District Court, Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 380-83474-

2018. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Smith. 

Justices Molberg and Goldstein 

participating. 

 Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED. 

Judgment entered June 29, 2021 

 
 –5– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

MARCUS JOHNSON-MCBRYDE, 

Appellant 

No. 05-20-00362-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 380th Judicial 

District Court, Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 380-81396-

2019. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Smith. 

Justices Molberg and Goldstein 

participating. 

 Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED. 

Judgment entered June 29, 2021 

 
 –6– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

MARCUS JOHNSON-MCBRYDE, 

Appellant 

No. 05-20-00363-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 380th Judicial 

District Court, Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 380-81395-

2019. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Smith. 

Justices Molberg and Goldstein 

participating. 

 Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED. 

Judgment entered June 29, 2021 

 
 –7– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

MARCUS JOHNSON-MCBRYDE, 

Appellant 

No. 05-20-00365-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 380th Judicial 

District Court, Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 199-83250-

2018. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Smith. 

Justices Molberg and Goldstein 

participating. 

 Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED. 

Judgment entered June 29, 2021 

 
 –8– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

MARCUS JOHNSON-MCBRYDE, 

Appellant 

No. 05-20-00366-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 380th Judicial 

District Court, Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 199-83247-

2018. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Smith. 

Justices Molberg and Goldstein 

participating. 

 Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED. 

Judgment entered June 29, 2021 

 
 –9– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

MARCUS JOHNSON-MCBRYDE, 

Appellant 

No. 05-20-00367-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 380th Judicial 

District Court, Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 199-83246-

2018. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Smith. 

Justices Molberg and Goldstein 

participating. 

 Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED. 

Judgment entered June 29, 2021 

 
 –10– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

MARCUS JOHNSON-MCBRYDE, 

Appellant 

No. 05-20-00368-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 380th Judicial 

District Court, Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 199-81278-

2018. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Smith. 

Justices Molberg and Goldstein 

participating. 

 Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED. 

Judgment entered June 29, 2021.