alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Insect Behavior and Biocontrol Research: Gainesville, FL
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Gainesville, Florida Center for Medical, Agricultural and Veterinary Entomology Insect Behavior and Biocontrol Research Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Collaborations The Insect Behavior and Biocontrol Research has a long and productive history of collaborative research involving stakeholders.  Current collaborators and projects:  Managing Invasive Weeds and Insect Pests Using Biologically-Based Methods Experiential Learning and Automation of Insect Pest Detection  Female-specific Conditional Lethality Genetic-Sexing Strains For Improved SIT  An Assessment of Genetic Breakdown and Transposon Vector Horizontal Transfer as it Affects Transgenic Strain Stability in Insect Species  Enabling Sustainable Control Of Fruit-fly Agricultural Pests Using CRISPR-Editing Of High-throughput Selectable Traits Of Target Insect Species  Sterile Male Fruit Fly Strains for Improved Biologically-Based Population Control


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit 32


             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C., ss.1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Xerion
EcoSolutions Group Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and President, and the
Treasurer and principal financial officer of the Company, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of Xerion
EcoSolutions Group Inc.

Dated: May 14, 2006

                                         /s/ Fang Zhong
                                         ------------------------------
                                         Fang Zhong
                                         Chief Executive Officer, President
                                         and Treasurer
GCMRC Work Plan - Flip Cart Comments

Terrestrial / Ecosystem Monitoring

- How will you incorporate inventory data from EIS?

- Will vegetation monitoring capture vegetation change in communities like OHWZ?

- Will this be a 5-year effort?

Monitoring Kanab Ambersnail

- Will you monitor translocated populations?

- Will this be done in-house?

Mapping

- what will happen if appropriated funds are not obtained?

Holocene Terrace Deposits

- Has PA “ad hoc” group provided input on the PEP recommendations?

- Will you hold a workshop before mapping?

Data Base Plan

- What is total cost?

- Will it be done through contract?

- Is this to develop a new database?

- 2-year effort?

Monitoring Plan 

- Will this design a plan for register eligible properties, as those that are not register eligible?

- How will tribes and NPS be involved?

- Distinguish between the 2 for deliverables

- Is this a one-year project? 

Public Outreach
Sediment

- how is the program changing?

- how much of first 3 projects are monitoring? (Need to show contributions from other program

areas).

- Will model development also include cultural sites at higher elevations?

Aquatic

- Food base in Lees Ferry reach?

- longitudinal aspects of sampling?

Monitoring Fish

- will protocols be changed to encourage links between food base and fish? 

- new RFP, but task is ongoing?

Monitoring Fish below Paria

- Monitoring is appropriately funded from power revenues

- are species of concern limited to list? (HBC, FMS, RB, BRT)

 Carp and catfish?

- where does FMS in Lees Ferry reach get addressed?

Ongoing Monitoring Lees Ferry Trout

- recommend title be “Lees Ferry Fishery” to include natives

- expand deliverables?

- include score report?

- part of long-term monitoring?

- 2001 RFP’s include native fish?

- define bioenergetics model 

- issue of artificial division of native and non-native fish/ above & below Lees Ferry –> in conjunction

with timing of PEP review

- recruitment of trout an important issue, re: native fish in Lees Ferry Reach.

Integrated Water Quality Program

- human health concerns part of program?

Fishery Research
- when start?

- 1-2 years?

- what happens if appropriated $ don’t come through?
IT Database

- Assumptions: re: GCMRC salary costs should be consistent between programs

- no Oracle contractor costs?

- prime candidate for appropriated $

Aerial

- digital IR preferred format?

General

- need “Taubert” detailed budget package
1 – ORDER FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO EAJA

Drew L. Johnson

Kathryn Tassinari

sherwoodreese@comcast.net

kathrynt50@comcast.net

1700 Valley River Drive

Eugene, OR 97401

(541) 434-6466

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 DISTRICT OF OREGON

DONALD L. CRUM,

Civil No. 6:16-cv-00102-HZ

Plaintiff, 

 ORDER FOR ATTORNEY FEES

vs. PURSUANT TO EAJA

 

Commissioner of Social Security 

Administration,

Defendant.

____________________________________

After considering the Stipulated Motion of the parties submitted herein, Order hereby 

grants that Commissioner shall pay Plaintiff’s attorney the sum of $4872.40 upon verification 

that Plaintiff has no debt to the government which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, 

pursuant to the reasoning in Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 130 S. Ct. 2521, 2527 (2010) (EAJA 

awards fees subject “to a federal administrative offset if the Litigant has outstanding federal 

debts”) for full settlement of all claims for fees under EAJA. 

Case 6:16-cv-00102-HZ Document 21-2 Filed 05/10/17 Page 1 of 2
2 – ORDER FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO EAJA

If Plaintiff has no such federal debt, payment of $4872.40 shall be made to Plaintiff’s 

attorney Drew L. Johnson and mailed to his office at 1700 Valley River Drive, Eugene, OR 

97401. If Plaintiff has such debt, the check for any remaining funds after offset shall be made 

out to Plaintiff and mailed to counsel’s office at the address provided above.

IT IS SO ORDERED this day of May _____, 2016

______________________________

U.S. District Judge/Magistrate Judge

PRESENTED BY:

By: /s/ DREW L. JOHNSON

Drew L. Johnson, OSB #75200

Of Attorneys for Plaintiff

Case 6:16-cv-00102-HZ Document 21-2 Filed 05/10/17 Page 2 of 2
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Knipling-Bushland U.S. Livestock Insects Research Laboratory: Kerrville, TX
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Docs
                    Grand Challenge Synergies ProjectSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Kerrville, Texas Knipling-Bushland U.S. Livestock Insects Research Laboratory Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications
- Overview
- Summary

Grand Challengeheadline bar **USDA-ARS Grand Challenge:** **Integrated Approaches for the Control of Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases of Livestock.**  **Goal:** The synergistic goal of this Grand Challenge project is to use cattle fever ticks and bovine babesiosis as a model to inform strategies to prevent or mitigate future incursions of invasive tick species in the US.  To meet this goal we will: Define the biogeographical factors that allow for tick success and range expansion.
Identify genetic determinants of traits that enable adaptation by tick populations.
Develop novel and refine existing interventions targeting ticks and cattle pathogens.
Determine the costs and benefits of various interventions to control ticks and tick-borne diseases.  Summary narrative can be found here.  /ARSUserFiles/30940500/Custom Images/img2_Page_2.jpg


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Fifth Circuit**

____________ No. 23-50355 Summary Calendar

____________ United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee ,

versus Garry Lavert Samuels, Defendant—Appellant ,

consolidated with

_____________ No. 23-50363

_____________ United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee ,

versus Garrie Lavert Samuels, Defendant—Appellant

.

______________________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 11, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-50355 Document: 60-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/11/20242 USDC Nos. 7:22-CR-264-1, 7:22-CR-270-1

______________________________ Before Smith, Higginson, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam: * The Federal Public Defender, who was appointed to represent Garrie Lavert Samuels in these consolidated appeals, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Samuels has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the re cords reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeals present no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeals are DISMISSED

. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 23-50355 Document: 60-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/11/2024
# C_2006246EN.01001001.xml

| 13.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/10

---

Imposition by France of a public service obligation for scheduled air services between Strasbourg and Frankfurt

(2006/C 246/10)

(Text with EEA relevance)

| 1. | France has decided to impose a public service obligation on scheduled air services between Strasbourg and Frankfurt pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 of 23 July 1992 on access for Community air carriers to intra-Community air routes. |
| --- | --- |

1.

France has decided to impose a public service obligation on scheduled air services between Strasbourg and Frankfurt pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 of 23 July 1992 on access for Community air carriers to intra-Community air routes.

2.   The public service obligation is as follows:

2.1.   Frequency

The minimum level of service provided between Frankfurt and Strasbourg must be four round trips per day from Monday to Friday, all year round except for the month of August, when there must be a minimum of one round trip per day, from Monday to Friday. The flights in question must be non-stop.

2.2.   Type of aircraft used and minimum capacity provided

The services must be operated by aircraft with at least 48 seats.

2.3.   Timetables

The first flight in the day departing from Frankfurt must leave at a time that enables flights from other European countries to connect. All four services must coincide with connecting flights at Frankfurt airport.

The timetable must coincide with parliamentary sessions, i.e. arriving at Strasbourg close to but no later than 14:00 for the session beginning at 15:00 and leaving Strasbourg no earlier than 17:00, when the sessions end.

2.4.   Flight bookings

Seats on these flights must be marketed by a computerised booking system.

2.5.   Continuity of service

Except in cases of force majeure, the number of flights cancelled for reasons directly attributable to the carrier must not exceed 2 % of the number of flights scheduled in any IATA scheduling season. The carrier must give a minimum of six months' notice before discontinuing these services.

Community carriers are hereby informed that the operation of air services without regard to the abovementioned public service obligation may result in administrative and/or criminal penalties.

---
# C_2006246EN.01000201.xml

| 13.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/2

---

Amendment by France of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services between Strasbourg and Amsterdam

(2006/C 246/02)

(Text with EEA relevance)

| 1. | France has decided to amend, with effect from 25 March 2007, the public service obligation imposed on scheduled air services between Strasbourg and Amsterdam published in the
  Official Journal of the European Communities No C 85 of 9 April 2002 pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 of 23 July 1992 on access for Community air carriers to intra-Community air routes. |
| --- | --- |

1.

France has decided to amend, with effect from 25 March 2007, the public service obligation imposed on scheduled air services between Strasbourg and Amsterdam published in the
  Official Journal of the European Communities No C 85 of 9 April 2002 pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 of 23 July 1992 on access for Community air carriers to intra-Community air routes.

Official Journal of the European Communities

2.   The public service obligation is as follows:

2.1.   Frequency

The minimum level of service provided between Amsterdam and Strasbourg must be two round trips per day from Monday to Friday, all year round except for the month of August, when there must be a minimum of one round trip per day, from Monday to Friday. The flights in question must be non-stop.

2.2.   Type of aircraft used and minimum capacity provided

The services must be operated by jet aircraft with at least 48 seats.

2.3.   Timetables

The first flight in the day departing from Amsterdam must leave at a time that enables flights from other European countries to connect.

The timetable must coincide with parliamentary sessions, i.e. arriving at Strasbourg close to but no later than 14:00 for the session beginning at 15:00 and leaving Strasbourg close to but no earlier than 17:00, when the sessions end.

The two daily rotations must enable passengers to make a return trip in one day.

2.4.   Flight bookings

Seats on these flights must be marketed by a computerised booking system.

2.5.   Continuity of service

Except in cases of force majeure, the number of flights cancelled for reasons directly attributable to the carrier must not exceed 2 % of the number of flights scheduled in any IATA scheduling season. The carrier must give a minimum of six months' notice before discontinuing these services.

Community carriers are hereby informed that the operation of air services without regard to the abovementioned public service obligation may result in administrative and/or criminal penalties.

---
Exhibit 10.19

GOOD TIMES RESTAURANTS INC.

STOCK OPTION GRANT NOTICE

UNDER THE 2001 STOCK OPTION PLAN

Good Times Restaurants Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), pursuant to its 2001 Stock Option Plan (the "Plan"), hereby grants to the Optionee named below an option to purchase the number of shares of the Company's Common Stock set forth below. This option is subject to all of the terms and conditions set forth herein and in Attachments I, II and III, which are incorporated herein in their entirety.

Optionee:
 
Date of Grant:
 
Shares Subject to Option:
 
Exercise Price Per Share:
 
Expiration Date:
 
Summary of Options to Date:
 

_____ Incentive Stock Option
_____ Nonstatutory Stock Option

Vesting Schedule:

This option shall vest and become exercisable in the following installments based on the Optionee's Continuous Status as an Employee over a four-year period commencing as of October 1, 2002:

Number of Shares (Installment)
Date of Earliest Exercise (Vesting)
 
 
Vesting Year 1
Vesting Date
Vesting Year 2
Vesting Date
Vesting Year 3
Vesting Date
Vesting Year 4
Vesting Date

 

In addition, this option shall become fully vested pursuant to the terms specified in Section 10(b) of the Plan. 

Payment: Payment of the exercise price of the option upon exercise thereof shall be by cash or check or by delivery of previously owned shares of the Company's Common Stock.

Additional Terms/Acknowledgments: The Optionee acknowledges receipt of, and understands and agrees to, this Grant Notice, the Stock Option Agreement and the Plan. The Optionee further acknowledges that as of the date of grant set forth above, this Grant Notice, the Stock Option Agreement and the Plan set forth the entire understanding between the Optionee and the Company regarding the acquisition of stock in the Company and supersede all prior oral and written agreements on that subject with the exception of (i) options previously granted and delivered to the Optionee under the Plan, and (ii) the following agreements only:

Other Agreements:

____________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________

GOOD TIMES RESTAURANTS INC., OPTIONEE:

a Nevada corporation

 

 

By: _________________________________ ___________________________________

Boyd E. Hoback, President and CEO                                                   Optionee

Date Signed: _________________________ Date Signed: _______________________

 

Attachment I: Stock Option Agreement

Attachment II: Stock Option Plan

Attachment III: Notice of Exercise
II

Calendar No. 378

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1898

To designate the Federal building located at 1301 Clay Street in Oakland,

California, as the ‘‘Ronald V. Dellums Federal Building’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 1, 1998

Mrs. BOXER (for herself and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

MAY 21, 1998

Reported by Mr. CHAFEE, without amendment

A BILL

To designate the Federal building located at 1301 Clay

Street in Oakland, California, as the ‘‘Ronald V. Dellums

Federal Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1898 RS

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF RONALD V. DELLUMS FED2 ERAL BUILDING.

3 The Federal building located at 1301 Clay Street in

4 Oakland, California, shall be known and designated as the

5 ‘‘Ronald V. Dellums Federal Building’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

9 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

10 a reference to the ‘‘Ronald V. Dellums Federal Building’’.

Calendar No. 378

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1898

A BILL

To designate the Federal building located at 1301

ald V. Dellums Federal Building’’.Clay Street in Oakland, California, as the ‘‘RonMAY 21, 1998

Reported without amendment
Exhibit 13.1



Certification



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Coles Myer Ltd, an Australian company (the registrant), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended July 31, 2005 (the Report)
of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the registrant.



|                       |  |  |  |                                                  
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                       |  | 
|                       |  |  |  | /s/ J.E. FLETCHER                                
|Date December 15, 2005 |  |  |  | (Signature) J.E. Fletcher CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER