alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Amendment No. 2 to Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Option Plan



 Exhibit 10.6 
 MODUSLINK GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, INC. 
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED 1999 STOCK OPTION PLAN FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS 
 The Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors, as amended (the “Plan”) of ModusLink Global Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation, is hereby amended by deleting all references
to “CMGI, Inc.” and substituting in lieu thereof “ModusLink Global Solutions, Inc.” 
 *********** 
  

	
	Adopted by the Board of Directors on
	September 24, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          59,439
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,598
<ALLOWANCES>                                       752
<INVENTORY>                                      7,720
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                80,419
<PP&E>                                          17,496
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,430
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  90,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,079
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           250
<OTHER-SE>                                      65,636
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    90,600
<SALES>                                         30,494
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,494
<CGS>                                            9,295
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,295
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,285
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (677)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,591
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,050
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,541
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,541
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.20


</TABLE>
1 – OPINION AND ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

EUGENE DIVISION

BRENDA L. HUDDLESTON,

No. 6:15-cv-01660-SB

Plaintiff, 

OPINION AND ORDER

v. 

COMMISSONER, SOCIAL 

SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

 Defendant. 

MOSMAN, J., 

On January 10, 2017, Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman issued her Findings and 

Recommendation (“F&R”) [25], recommending that the Commissioner’s decision should be 

REVERSED and REMANDED for an immediate award of benefits. Neither party objected to 

the F&R. 

DISCUSSION

The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may 

file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge, 

but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to 

make a de novo determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or 

recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). However, the court 

is not required to review, de novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of 

Case 6:15-cv-01660-SB Document 27 Filed 02/08/17 Page 1 of 2
2 – OPINION AND ORDER

the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See 

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 

(9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F&R 

depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject, 

or modify any part of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). 

Upon careful review, I agree with Judge Beckerman’s recommendation and I ADOPT the 

F&R [25] as my own opinion. The Commissioner’s decision is REVERSED and REMANDED 

for immediate calculation and payment of benefits. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 8th day of February, 2017. 

/s/ Michael W. Mosman_________ 

MICHAEL W. MOSMAN

Chief United States District Judge

Case 6:15-cv-01660-SB Document 27 Filed 02/08/17 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 166 (Tuesday, August 31, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 48747]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-18725]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Amended 
Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Heart, Lung, and Blood Advisory Council, August 31, 2021-September 1, 
2021, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, which 
was published in the Federal Register on August 4, 2021, FR Doc 2021-
16549, 86 FR 41983.
    This notice is being amended to change the start time for the 
second Open session on September 1, 2021, which will now be 12:30 p.m. 
and will still end at 2:30 p.m. as listed. The meeting is closed to the 
public.

    Dated: August 25, 2021.
David W. Freeman,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-18725 Filed 8-30-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Mycotoxin Prevention and Applied Microbiology Research: Peoria, IL
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    NCAUR homepageSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Peoria, Illinois National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research Mycotoxin Prevention and Applied Microbiology Research People





- NCAUR Home Page
- MPM Home Page
- Personnel Listing

Travis W Adkins    Computer Assistant Travis AdkinsPhone: (309) 681-6573 Fax: (309) 681-6672Room 3111USDA ARS NCAUR1815 N University St.Peoria IL 61604**Computer Assistant with NRRL Culture Collection Staff**
Travis Adkins joined the ARS Culture Collection in 2012. Travis serves as administrator for the Patent and Open Collection. He handles all routine database operations including request processing, processing new strain accession data and maintenance of inventory records, and Web development for the research unit. Travis has over 26 years with the Federal Government, with 21 years of Active Duty in the US Army. Travis has completed numerous certifications within his Computer Science Degree, which include, MCSA, MCSE, A+, CCNA, and CCNP.
.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
BIOMETRIC SECURITY CORP. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED MARCH 31, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> CANADIAN DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  .6626
<CASH>                                         155,218
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   70,398
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               225,616
<PP&E>                                          61,161<FN>
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,383
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,763,244
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          113,352
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    14,862,363
<OTHER-SE>                                (10,212,471)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,763,244
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,954
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  353,880
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (164,855)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (132,071)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (132,071)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
<FN> 
Convertible debentures $4,476,467 
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Gabrielle	D.	Richards

gabby@cascadialawyers.com

Licensed	in	Oregon	and	Washington

111	SW	Fifth	Avenue,	Suite	3150

Portland,	Oregon	97204

B: 503-444-3449

F:	503-296-5834

Hon.	Robert	J.	Bryan

United	States	Courthouse

1717	Pacific	Avenue,	Room	3100

Tacoma,	WA	98402-3200

VIA CM/ECF	

October	30,	2017

Re: LNV	Corporation	v.	Subramaniam,	

U.S.	District	Court	for	the	District	of	Oregon,	Case	No.	3:14-cv-01836-RJB		

To	the	Court:

I	 am	 one	 of	 the	 attorneys	 representing	 plaintiff LNV	 Corporation	(“LNV”)	 in	 the	

above-referenced	case,	which was	recently	re-assigned	to	Judge Bryan from	the	U.S.	

District	 Court	 for	 the	District	 of	Oregon.	 	(Dkt.	 136.)	 	Prior	 to	the case	being	 reassigned to	Judge	Bryan,	defendant	Denise	Subramaniam	(“Defendant”)	filed	a	Rule	

60	motion for	relief	from	judgment.		(Dkt.	134.)		I	write	to	the	Court	regarding	this	

motion and	provide the	following	brief	background:

1. This	is	a	judicial	foreclosure	case.		The	Complaint	was	filed	in	November	2014.

2. The	District	of	Oregon granted	LNV’s	motion	for	summary	judgment	on October

16,	2015 and	entered	judgment	on	November	4,	2015. (Dkt. 111, 116).

3. Defendant filed	 suit	 against	 an	 LNV	 executive	 and	 Perkins	 Coie	 LLP,	 LNV’s	

counsel	in	the	current case, on	October	23,	2015.		(See District	of	Oregon	Case	

No.	3:15-cv-02002-MO.)		In	that	case,	the	Court	issued a	pre-filing	review	order

on	November	4,	2015	that	applies	 to	any	case	in	which	Defendant	is	or	may	

become	a	litigant.		(Dkt.	8.)		The	review	order	states	that: “All	filings	by	Denise	

Subramaniam,	 individually	 or	 alleged	 in	 connection	 with	 any	 other	 party,	

SHALL	BY	REVIEWED	BY	THIS	COURT	AND	ORDERED	FILED	ONLY	 IF	SUCH	

FILINGS	 ARE DEEMED	 NOT	 FRIVOLOUS	 OR	 REPETITIVE.	 	 This	 Pre-Filing	

Case 3:14-cv-01836-RJB Document 138 Filed 10/30/17 Page 1 of 2
2

Review	 Order	 shall	 remain	 in	 effect	 until	 the	 Court	 otherwise	 directs.”	 	The	

District	Court	dismissed	that	case	on	November	10,	2015.		(Dkt.	17.)

4. Defendant	appealed the	current	case	to	the	U.S.	Court	of	Appeals for	the Ninth

Circuit,	Case	No.	15-35963.		The	Ninth	Circuit affirmed	on	October	6,	2017.

5. Defendant	filed	a	Rule	60	motion	in	the	current	case	on	October	19,	2017,	more

than	two	years	after	the	District	of	Oregon	granted	summary	judgment	in	favor

of	LNV on	its	foreclosure	complaint.		(Dkt.	134.)

The	deadline	for	LNV’s	response	to	the	Rule	60	motion	is	Thursday,	November	

2,	2017.		In	light	of	the	pre-filing	review	order	currently	in	place,	LNV	seeks

guidance	as	to	whether	it	should	prepare	and	file	a	response	to	the	Rule	60	

motion	or	wait	until	the	Court reviews the	Rule	60	motion and	determines	if

a	response	is	needed. The	Court’s	guidance	is	appreciated.

Sincerely,

cl-�

Gabrielle	D.	Richards

Case 3:14-cv-01836-RJB Document 138 Filed 10/30/17 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 99.16

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Colmena Corp. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period  ending  March 31, 2002 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,  Anthony Q. Joffe,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.

 /s/ Anthony Q. Joffe/s/

Anthony Q. Joffe
President and Chief Executive Officer
May 14, 2003
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Southeast Watershed Research: Tifton, GA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Scientific Partnerships
                        Long Term Agriculture Research Network (LTAR)
                                    GA Coastal Plain LTAR
                                    NRCS Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP)
                                    Southeast Biomass Research Center
                    About Us
                        History & Program
                                    Business Partnerships
                                    Models
                                    Public DataSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Tifton, Georgia Southeast Watershed Research Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Collaborations The Southeast Watershed Research has a long and productive history of collaborative research involving stakeholders.  Current collaborators and projects:


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
# C_2006242EN.01001301.xml

| 7.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 242/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242/13

---

Publication of decisions by Member States to grant or revoke operating licenses pursuant to Article 13(4) of Council Regulation No 2407/92 on licensing of air carriers (1)
   (2)

1

2

(2006/C 242/10)

(Text with EEA relevance)

AUSTRIA

Operating licences granted

Category A:   Operating licences without the restriction of Article 5(7)(a) of Regulation No 2407/92

| Name of air carrier | Address of air carrier | Permitted to carry | Decision effective since |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| AVIA CONSULT
  Flugbetriebsgesellschaft m.b.h. | Promenadenweg |
| A-2522 Oberwaltersdorf |

Name of air carrier

Address of air carrier

Permitted to carry

Decision effective since

AVIA CONSULT

Flugbetriebsgesellschaft m.b.h.

Promenadenweg

A-2522 Oberwaltersdorf

passengers, mail, cargo

25.8.2006

Wucher Helicopter GmbH

| Hans-Wucher-Platz 1 |
| --- |
| A-6713 Ludesch |

Hans-Wucher-Platz 1

A-6713 Ludesch

passengers, mail, cargo

8.9.2006

Category B:   Operating licences including the restriction of Article 5(7)(a) of Regulation No 2407/92

| Name of air carrier | Address of air carrier | Permitted to carry | Decision effective since |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| LFU — Peter Gabriel | Firmiangasse 23 |
| A-1130 Wien |

Name of air carrier

Address of air carrier

Permitted to carry

Decision effective since

LFU — Peter Gabriel

Firmiangasse 23

A-1130 Wien

passengers, mail, cargo

24.8.2006

Rath Aviation GmbH

| Franz-Peyerl-Straβe 7 |
| --- |
| A-5020 Salzburg |

Franz-Peyerl-Straβe 7

A-5020 Salzburg

passengers, mail, cargo

29.8.2006

DJT Aviation GmbH & Co. KG

| Fyrtagweg 5 |
| --- |
| A-8043 Graz |

Fyrtagweg 5

A-8043 Graz

passengers, mail, cargo

4.9.2006

---

(1)  OJ L 240, 24.8.1992, p. 1.

1

(2)  Communicated to the European Commission before 31.8.2005

2

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1737 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1737

    To nullify certain guidance of the Bureau of Consumer Financial 
   Protection and to provide requirements for guidance issued by the 
             Bureau with respect to indirect auto lending.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 13, 2015

Mr. Guinta (for himself, Mr. Perlmutter, Mr. Stutzman, Mr. David Scott 
  of Georgia, Mr. Stivers, Mr. Sherman, Mr. Williams, Mr. Kildee, and 
 Mrs. Beatty) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To nullify certain guidance of the Bureau of Consumer Financial 
   Protection and to provide requirements for guidance issued by the 
             Bureau with respect to indirect auto lending.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reforming CFPB Indirect Auto 
Financing Guidance Act''.

SEC. 2. NULLIFICATION OF AUTO LENDING GUIDANCE.

    Bulletin 2013-02 of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection 
(published March 21, 2013) shall have no force or effect.

SEC. 3. GUIDANCE REQUIREMENTS.

    Section 1022(b) of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 
(12 U.S.C. 5512(b)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(5) Guidance on indirect auto financing.--In proposing 
        and issuing guidance primarily related to indirect auto 
        financing, the Bureau shall--
                    ``(A) provide for a public notice and comment 
                period before issuing the guidance in final form;
                    ``(B) make available to the public, including on 
                the website of the Bureau, all studies, data, 
                methodologies, analyses, and other information relied 
                on by the Bureau in preparing such guidance;
                    ``(C) redact any information that is exempt from 
                disclosure under paragraph (3), (4), (6), (7), or (8) 
                of section 552(b) of title 5, United States Code;
                    ``(D) consult with the Board of Governors of the 
                Federal Reserve System, the Federal Trade Commission, 
                and the Department of Justice; and
                    ``(E) conduct a study on the costs and impacts of 
                such guidance to consumers and women-owned, minority-
                owned, and small businesses.''.
                                 <all>
```