alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006037EN.01000201.xml

| 14.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 37/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/2

---

Publication of decisions by Member States to grant or revoke operating licenses pursuant to Article 13(4) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92 on licensing of air carriers (1)
   (2)

1

2

(2006/C 37/02)

(Text with EEA relevance)

AUSTRIA

Operating licences granted

Category B:   Operating licences including the restriction of Article 5(7)(a) of Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92

| Name of air carrier | Address of air carrier | Permitted to carry | Decision effective since |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| TRANSPED AVIATION GmbH | Gewerbepark 1 |
| A-6300 Wörgl |

Name of air carrier

Address of air carrier

Permitted to carry

Decision effective since

TRANSPED AVIATION GmbH

Gewerbepark 1

A-6300 Wörgl

passengers, mail, cargo

30.12.2005

---

(1)  OJ L 240, 24.8.1992, p. 1.

1

(2)  Communicated to the European Commission before 31.8.2005.

2

---
#### Paul Solomons, Appellant, v Douglas Elliman LLC, et al., Defendants, and 23 Manhattan Valley North LLC et al., Respondents.

[944 NYS2d 559] —

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Judith J. Gische, J.), entered September 23, 2011, which, insofar as appealed from, in this action alleging that defendants discriminated against prospective tenants using a Section 8 voucher for the payment of rent, denied plaintiffs motion to compel the discovery of documents relating to piercing the corporate veil between defendants 23 Manhattan Valley North LLC and Baruch Singer, with leave to renew in the event plaintiff obtains a judgment in the action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court providently exercised its discretion in denying plaintiffs motion since there is no basis, at this stage of the proceedings, to seek to pierce the corporate veil. The general statutory exemption from personal responsibility for an organization’s debts, obligations and liabilities does not extend to discriminatory acts by a person with an ownership interest in, or the power to make decisions for the organization (see *Pepler v Coyne,*33 AD3d 434, 435 [2006]; Administrative Code of City of NY §8-107 [5]).

It is noted that contrary *to*defendants’ contention, the subject order is appealable as of right. Plaintiffs motion was made on notice and affected a substantial right of the parties, namely the ability to pursue a theory of the case *(see*CPLR 5701 [a] [2] [v]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Sweeny, Renwick, Freedman and AbdusSalaam, JJ.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Case 3:15-cv-00715-ST Document 17 Filed 09/09/15 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 3:15-cv-00715-ST Document 17 Filed 09/09/15 Page 2 of 2
1 – ORDER FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO EAJA 

Sherwood J. Reese 

Sherwood.reese@comcast.net 

Drew L. Johnson, P.C. 

sherwoodreese@comcast.net 

1700 Valley River Drive 

Eugene, OR 97401 

(541) 434-6466 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES COURT DISTRICT COURT 

 DISTRICT OF OREGON 

DANIEL J. SCHLESINGER, 

 Civil No. 6:15-cv-02241-HZ 

 Plaintiff, 

 ORDER FOR ATTORNEY FEES 

 vs. PURSUANT TO EAJA 

 

Commissioner of Social Security 

Administration, 

 

 Defendant. 

____________________________________ 

After considering the Stipulated Motion of the parties submitted herein, Order hereby 

grants that Commissioner shall pay the sum of $1479.50 in attorney fees and expenses of $23.01 

(Service), for a total of $1502.51, upon verification that Plaintiff has no debt to the government 

which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, pursuant to the reasoning in Astrue v. Ratliff,

560 U.S. 586, 130 S. Ct. 2521, 2527 (2010) (EAJA awards fees subject “to a federal 

administrative offset if the Litigant has outstanding federal debts”) for full settlement of all 

Case 6:15-cv-02241-HZ Document 12 Filed 07/08/16 Page 1 of 2
2 – ORDER FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO EAJA 

claims for fees under EAJA. Costs for court filing-fees shall be awarded to Plaintiff attorney in 

the sum of $400.00 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1920. 

 If Plaintiff has no outstanding federal debt, payment of $1479.50 in attorney fees, $23.01 

in costs plus $400.00 reimbursement of Court filing-fees shall be made to Plaintiff’s attorney and 

mailed to his office at 1700 Valley River Drive, Eugene, OR 97401. If Plaintiff has such debt, 

the check for any remaining funds after offset shall be made out to Plaintiff and mailed to 

counsel’s office at the address provided above. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of July, 2016 

_______________________________

MARCO A. HERNANDEZ

PRESENTED BY: U.S. District Judge

By: /s/ SHERWOOD J. REESE

Sherwood J. Reese, OSB #144130 

Of Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Case 6:15-cv-02241-HZ Document 12 Filed 07/08/16 Page 2 of 2
KERRI ATWATER, 

v. 

HOT STONE, LLC., 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

Plaintiff(s), 

Defendant(s). 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Civil No. 03: 14-cv-01838-PK 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The Court having been informed by counsel for the parties that this action has been 

settled, 

IT IS ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs and 

with leave, upon good cause shown within sixty (60) days, to have this order of dismissal set 

aside and the action reinstated if the settlement is not consummated. Pending motions, if any, are 

DENIED AS MOOT. 

Dated this ~~e:'\day of May, 2015. 

Case 3:14-cv-01838-PK Document 13 Filed 05/28/15 Page 1 of 1
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1961

AN ACT

For the relief of Suchada Kwong.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for pur5 poses of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.

6 1101 et seq.), Suchada Kwong shall be held and consid7 ered to have been lawfully admitted to the United States

8 for permanent residence as of the date of the enactment

9 of this Act upon payment of the required visa fees.

Passed the Senate October 15 (legislative day, October 2), 1998.

Attest:

Secretary.
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1961

AN ACT

For the relief of Suchada Kwong.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Erik Johnson, Appellant.

[943 NYS2d 910] —

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lasak, J.), rendered March 25, 2010, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant was convicted, upon a jury verdict, of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree. The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction. We affirm.

“[E]ven if the Supreme Court erred in denying the defendant’s request for a missing witness charge, any error was harmless, as there was overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt and no significant probability that the error contributed to his conviction” *(People v Smalls,*81 AD3d 669, 670 [2011]; *see People v Chardon,*83 AD3d 954, 955 [2011]; *compare People v Brown,*75 AD3d 515, 516 [2010]). For the same reason, any error in admitting certain hearsay testimony of third parties as to what the victim and one of the witnesses said was harmless (see *People v Harvey,*270 AD2d 959, 960 [2000]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Angiolillo, J.P, Lott, Roman and Miller, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STA TES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

FRANKE. VOTH, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

MARK NOOTH; WILLIAM KING; 

DANIEL BANNER; COLETTE 

PETERS; GREGORY JONES; and 

MARICELA ROJAS, 

Defendant. 

MOSMAN,J., 

PENDLETON DIVISION 

No. 2:14-cv-01855-AC 

OPINION AND ORDER 

On April 27, 2016, Magistrate Judge John Acosta issued his Findings and 

Recommendation (F&R) [79], recommending that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 

[57] should be GRANTED and this action should be dismissed. No objections to the Findings 

and Recommendation were filed. 

DISCUSSION 

The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may 

file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge, 

but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to 

make a de nova determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or 

recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b )(! )(C). However, the court 

is not required to review, de nova or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of 

1 - OPINION AND ORDER 

v Case 2:14-cv-01855-AC Document 85 Filed 06/01/16 Page 1 of 2
the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See 

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 

(9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F&R 

depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject, 

or modify any part of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(C). 

Upon review, I agree with Judge Acosta's recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R [79] 

as my own opm10n. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this_~\_ day of June, 2016. 

Chief United States District Judge 

2 - OPINION AND ORDER 

Case 2:14-cv-01855-AC Document 85 Filed 06/01/16 Page 2 of 2
EX-10.5.B.VIII












EXHIBIT 10.5(b)(viii)




SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO TRUST AGREEMENT BETWEEN

FIDELITY MANAGEMENT TRUST COMPANY AND

THE SCOTTS COMPANY




     THIS SEVENTH AMENDMENT, dated as of the 1st day of September, 2002, except as
otherwise indicated below, by and between Fidelity Management Trust Company (the “Trustee”) and The
Scotts Company (the “Sponsor”);



WITNESSETH:




     WHEREAS, the Trustee and the Sponsor heretofore entered into a Trust Agreement dated January
1, 1998 with regard to The Scotts Company Executive Retirement Plan (the “Plan”); and



     WHEREAS, the Sponsor has informed the Trustee that effective October 1, 2002, the assets of
the Baron Asset Fund and the Fidelity Worldwide Fund are frozen to incoming contributions and
exchanges in; and



     WHEREAS, the Trustee and the Sponsor now desire to amend said Trust Agreement as provided for
in Section 14 thereof;



     NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the above premises, the Trustee and the Sponsor hereby
amend the Trust Agreement by:




	 	(1)	 	Amending the “investment options” section of Schedule “A”, to add the
following:






	 	•	 	Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund
	 
	 	•	 	Fidelity Freedom 2040 Fund®
	 
	 	•	 	Managers Special Equity Fund
	 
	 	•	 	Dodge & Cox Stock Fund
	 
	 	•	 	EuroPacific Growth Fund — Class A






	 	(2)	 	Effective October 1, 2002, amending the “investment options” section of
Schedule “A”, to reflect that the Baron Asset Fund and the Fidelity
Worldwide Fund are frozen to incoming contributions and exchanges in.
	 
	 	(3)	 	Amending and restating the “Outside Mutual Funds” section of Schedule “B”, as
follows:





	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Non-Fidelity Mutual Funds:
	 	Non-Fidelity Mutual Fund vendors shall pay fees directly
to Fidelity Investments Institutional Operations Company, Inc. (FIIOC) or its
affiliates equal to such percentage (generally 25 to 50 basis points)
of plan assets invested in such Non-Fidelity
Mutual Funds as may be disclosed periodically,
or, in the case of the following






 









 






	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	investment
options, in the amounts listed below:
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Dodge & Cox Stock Fund: 10 basis points.
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	EuroPacific Growth Fund — Class A: 25 basis
points, and $3.00 per Participant, per year.
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Unless otherwise noted, disclosure shall be
posted and updated quarterly on Plan Sponsor
Webstation at https://psw.fidelity.com
or a successor site.






     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Trustee and the Sponsor have caused this Seventh Amendment to be
executed by their duly authorized officers effective as of the day and year first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	THE SCOTTS COMPANY	 	 	 	FIDELITY MANAGEMENT TRUST

COMPANY	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:
	 	/s/ George A. Murphy	8/20/02	 	 	By:	 	/s/ Roberta Coen	 	9/5/02	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	Date	 	 	 	 	FMTC Authorized Signatory
	 	Date	 	 






2
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OFCRIMINAL APPEALS OFTEXAS PO BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 

### OFFICIAL BUSINESS STATE OF TEXAS PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE 12/17/2014 

### LINDECAMP, JED SAMUEL 3TOHP PITNEY BOWES 

## $ 00.26s DEC 18 2014 02 1M

. 0004279596 

# ^MAILEDFROMZ"WfP-&2,^07-01 The Court has dismissed your application for writ ofhabeas corpus without written 

## order; the sentence has been discharged? Ste,ExparteHarrington, 310 S.W.3d 452 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010).
Abel Acosta, Clerk

'•N3B' 7B2'Ol JED SAMUEL LINDECAMP 315 FRY STREET #2 DENTON, TX 76201 AN K



## Iii-"--Iimii-jiTf^iliMfilIv1ll"li:l»JMll""ITr"l-i-»l.t-,i"i.I1i-
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Aerial Application Technology Research: College Station, TX
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area College Station, Texas Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center Aerial Application Technology Research Docs







Dr. Chenghai Yangheadline bar Dr. Yang's Bio


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Annual Report of mPhase
Technologies, Inc., a New Jersey corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10K/A for the year ended June 30, 2018 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Ronald A. Durando, Chief Executive Officer of the Company
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:



| | 1. | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Ronald A. Durando   | 
|----------------------- | 
|Ronald A. Durando       | 
|Chief Executive Officer | 
|                        | 
|November 9, 2018        |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Advisory Council, August 31, 2021-September 1, 2021, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on August 4, 2021, FR Doc 2021-16549, 86 FR 41983.                

This notice is being amended to change the start time for the second Open session on September 1, 2021, which will now be 12:30 p.m. and will still end at 2:30 p.m. as listed. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: August 25, 2021. 

David W. Freeman,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-18725 Filed 8-30-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 31.2
 CFO Certification
 
 
 I, James J. Jungwirth , certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of The Amanda Company, Inc. (the "Company");
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
 untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
 to make the statements made, in light of circumstances under which such
 statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
 quarterly report; and
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
 information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
 respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
 Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.
 
 4. The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
 establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
 Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have:
 
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
 such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
 ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its
 consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
 particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
 b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure
 controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
 effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
 period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c) disclosed in this report any change in the Company's
 internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's
 most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
 to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting;
 
 5. The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
 on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
 the Company's auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors
 (or persons performing the equivalent functions);
 
 a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
 internal controls which could adversely affect the Company's ability to record,
 process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
 Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
 management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's
 internal controls over financial reporting.
 
 
 Date:  January 21, 2004
 
 
 
 /s/ James J. Jungwirth
 
 James J. Jungwirth
 Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 23.02**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-77682, 33-53726, 333-02948, 333-57965, 333-37168, 333-106062,and 333-106064 on Form S-8, 333-65555 and 333-122084 on Form S-3, and 333-31618 on Form S-4, of our report dated March 14, 2005 relating to the financial statements of Standard Gypsum, LP , appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of CaraustarIndustries, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2004. 

 

/s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

 

Atlanta, Georgia 

March 14, 2005