alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 10-Q FOR
THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                              20
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    20
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      20
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               17
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           3
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        20
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        2
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (2)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (2)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (2)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Kerrville, Texas
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home People & Locations







Joann  Growney
                        Location Support Staff

                        




                        
                        Office Automation Assistant (Office Automation)
                        Phone: (830) 223-2704
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### STERNGLANZ v. HUNGERFORD.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 14, 1896.)

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                  EXHIBIT 21.01


                  SUBSIDIARIES* OF CARAUSTAR INDUSTRIES, INC.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  STATE OF
                       NAME                                     INCORPORATION                   Trade, D/B/A Names
                       ----                                     -------------                   ------------------

<S>                                                            <C>                              <C>
Austell Holding Company, LLC                                   Georgia
Camden Paperboard Corporation                                  New Jersey
Caraustar, G.P. (a general partnership)                        South Carolina
Caraustar Custom Packaging Group, Inc.                         Delaware
Caraustar Custom Packaging Group (Maryland), Inc.              Maryland
Caraustar Design Tubes, Inc.                                   Canada
Caraustar Industrial Canada, Inc.                              Canada
Caraustar Industrial & Consumer Products Group, Inc.           Delaware
Caraustar Industrial & Consumer Products Group, Ltd.           Leyland, Lancaster,
                                                               United Kingdom
Caraustar Mill Group, Inc.                                     Ohio
Caraustar Paper Tube de Mexico (65% owned)                     Mexico
Caraustar Recovered Fiber Group, Inc.                          Delaware
Chicago Paperboard Corporation                                 Illinois
CICPG, LLC.                                                    North Carolina
Design Tubes Limited Ltd.                                      Canada
Federal Transport, Inc.                                        Ohio
Gypsum MGC, Inc.                                               Delaware
Halifax Paper Board Company, Inc.                              North Carolina
McQueeny Gypsum Company                                        Delaware
McQueeny Gypsum Company, LLC                                   Delaware
Paragon Plastics, Inc. (80% owned)                             South Carolina
PBL Inc.                                                       Delaware                         **
RECCMG, LLC.                                                   Georgia
Sprague Paperboard, Inc.                                       Connecticut
Pardigm Chemical & Consulting, LLC                             Georgia
</TABLE>

*        Each subsidiary is wholly-owned (directly or, indirectly) by Caraustar
         Industries, Inc. unless otherwise indicated.

**       Does business in Indiana as PBL Indiana Inc.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Cell Wall Biology and Utilization Research: Madison, WI
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Madison, Wisconsin U.S. Dairy Forage Research Center Cell Wall Biology and Utilization Research Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Collaborations The Cell Wall Biology and Utilization Research has a long and productive history of collaborative research involving stakeholders.  Current collaborators and projects:


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Range Management Research: Las Cruces, NM
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Comprehensive Publications
                    Research SummarySearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Las Cruces, New Mexico Range Management Research Docs





- Landscape Toolbox
- Long Term Agricultural Research
- EcoTrends
- Long Term Ecological Research
- Ecological Site Descriptions
- Monitoring & Assessment
- Southwest Climate Hub
- Land Potential Knowledge System
- National Ecological Observatory Network
- JournalMap
- Assessment, Inventory, and Monitoring (AIM)
- Data Catalogs

GROUND TROOP ACTIVITIES: "INFANTRY"headline bar Ground troop activities ("Infantry") - Infantry disturbance was tested by crossing booted soldiers across sites a fixed number of times ensuring that every point had been disturbed (either having been stepped on or had soil directly kicked onto it) at least once. The number of times the soldiers passed across each plot was standardized during treatment. Infantry training is generally low impact and can be repeated at relatively high frequency at appropriate sites. To choose a soil on which to train Infantry, click on the picture below.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
# EUR-Lex - 52006AP0453 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52006AP0453

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Council Regulation (EC) No 639/2004 on the management of fishing fleets registered in the Community outermost regions (COM(2006)0433 - C6-0295/2006 - 2006/0148(CNS)) **

*
Official Journal 313 E , 20/12/2006 P. 0425 - 0426 *

P6_TA(2006)0453

Fishing fleets registered in the outermost regions *

European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Council Regulation (EC) No 639/2004 on the management of fishing fleets registered in the Community outermost regions (COM(2006)0433 — C6-0295/2006 — 2006/0148(CNS))

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2006)0433) [1],

- having regard to Articles 37 and 299(2) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0295/2006),

- having regard to Rules 51 and 134 of its Rules of Procedure,

1. Approves the Commission proposal;

2. Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

3. Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to amend the Commission proposal substantially;

4. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
SCORE Report 

Update

Prepared for the Glen 

Canyon Dam Adaptive 

Management Work 

Group

November 30, 2005
USGS Publication Policy

• “All data and information gathered through 

investigations and observations by the staff USGS and by its contractors, while on officduty, must not be disclosed to others until thinformation is made available to all, impartiand simultaneously through Director-approvformal publication or other approved means public release, except to the extent that such release is mandated by law.” 

Source: U.S.G.S. Geological Survey Manual (500.14 - Safeguard and Release of U.S. Geological Survey Data and Inform
SCORE Report Update

• Peer and editorial 

reviews have been successfully completed 

• USGS National 

Wetlands Research Center is preparing the report for publication

• Printed reports will be 

available for the Oct. Science Symposium
Table of Contents

• Foreword

P. Patrick Leahy, U.S. Geological Survey Acting Director

• Background and Introduction• 1. Influence of Glen Canyon Dam Operations 

Downstream Sand Resources of the Colorado Grand Canyon 

• 2. Fishes of Grand Canyon• 3. Climatic Fluctuations, Drought, and Flow in 

Colorado River

• 4. Water Quality in Lake Powell and the Colo

River
Table of Contents (cont.)

• 5. Aquatic Ecology: the Role of Organic Ma

and Invertebrates

• 6. Riparian Vegetation and Associated Wild• 7. Birds of the Colorado River in Grand Can

A Synthesis of the Status, Trends, and Dam Operation Effects

• 8. Debris Flows in Grand Canyon and Rapid

the Colorado River

• 9. Recreation Use Values and Nonuse Value

Glen and Grand Canyons
Table of Contents (cont.)

• 10. Hydropower Production at Glen Canyon 

Status and Trends

• 11. Cultural Resources in the Colorado Rive

Corridor

• 12. Recreational Values and Campsites in th

Colorado River Ecosystem

• 13. Lessons Learned from 10 Years of Adap

Management in Grand Canyon 
Glen Canyon Dam Glen Canyon Dam 

Adaptive Management Adaptive Management 

Program Program

Knowledge 

Assessment

& Policy 

Deliberations

Policy 

Implementation

Policy 

Establishment

N

P

SCORE 

Report

Research & 

Monitoring Effort

GCMRC 

Established

Re

De
Structure of the GCDAMP

Secretary of

the Interior

Adaptive Management 

Work Group

GCMRC Technical Work Group Inde

Revie

Designee

SCORE

Formulates Recommendations
• Restore CRE ecological health, maintain 

and power services provided by GCD as mandated by 1992 GCPA.

• The Question Becomes: Can the CRE b

restored through changes in dam operatioother actions within existing legal framewand at an acceptable cost? 

Goals of the GCD AMP
Thank You for Your Atten
Second Amendment to Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT 
 This SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the
“AMENDMENT”) is dated as of December 1, 2008, and amends that certain Employment Agreement (the “AGREEMENT”) executed June 8, 2005, and effective as of April 1, 2005, as amended, by and between ENHERENT CORP., a
Delaware corporation (the “COMPANY”) and PAMELA A. FREDETTE (the “EXECUTIVE”). 
 WITNESSETH: 
 WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement pursuant to Section 14(a) thereof as of the date hereof. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements set forth herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of
which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 
 1. Amendment. Section 3(a) of the Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

 (a) Effective January 1, 2009, the Executive shall receive an annualized base salary (“Annual Base Salary”) of $300,000
payable in accordance with the Company’s regular payroll practices for its senior executives, as in effect from time to time. 
 2. Affirmation of
Agreement. Except as amended hereby, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. From and after the date hereof, each reference to the Agreement and the documents or instruments referred to or provided for in or delivered under the
Agreement shall be deemed to refer to the Agreement as modified hereby. 
 3. Conflict. In the event of a conflict between the terms and conditions of
this Amendment and the terms and conditions of the Agreement, the terms and conditions of this Amendment shall control. 
 4. Definitions. All
capitalized terms used herein, except as specifically provided herein, have the same meanings as those in the Agreement. 
 IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the Executive has hereunto set the Executive’s hand and, pursuant to the authorization of its Board, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed in its name on its behalf. 
  

			
	ENHERENT CORP.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Lori Stanley

	Name:	 	 /s/ Lori Stanley

	Title:	 	 General Counsel

	
	EXECUTIVE
	
	 /s/ Pamela Fredette

	Pamela A. Fredette
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-18-00639-CV

Style: Loruhamah Dickey v. Harris County, City of Houston, Houston 

Community College System, Houston Independent School District

Date motions filed*: January 11, 2019

Type of motion: Motion for Extension of Time to Supplement Record for Brief

Party filing motion: Pro Se Appellant Loruhamah Dickey

Document to be filed: Appellant’s brief

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: January 11, 2019

Number of extensions granted: 0 Current Date: January 11, 2019

Date Requested: N/A

Ordered that motions are:

 Granted

☒ If document is to be filed, document is: February 11, 2019.

☐ Denied

☐ Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

Appellant’s pro se motion for an extension of time to supplement the record, construed 

as an extension request to file appellant’s brief, is granted until February 11, 2019. 

Appellant is notified that the records are complete and that, if he seeks to supplement

the record, he must file a written request with the district clerk and he should put an

uncertified copy of the document in the appendix attached to his brief, with a notation 

that the certified copy has been requested. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c)(1).

Judge’s signature: ___/s/ Evelyn V. Keyes_________

 x Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: __January 24, 2019______
Grand Canyon Wildlands C

Glen Canyon National Recre

Lees Ferry 10 Acre Riparian Reveget







Ongoing Lees Ferry Operatio

•Flag Native Seed and Dick Clark replanted 100 T•Birds density and diversity exceeds pre treatmen•Irrigation scheduled to be terminated this year•Proposal to revegetate area upstream of boat LaFerry•Proposal for 6 Acre revegetation Project in Glen •Downstream of Lees Ferry????

Prognosis for Future of Lees Ferr

• Cottonwood and Sandbar willow trees on lower 

well and grow into mature trees•Cottonwoods and willows on upper terrace will st

some big flows come to inundate site•Goodings willow across site will struggle unless tflows•Upper terrace will be dominated by inkweed, four saltbush and arroweed•Natives should dominate but some tammys will band germinate•Recommended that the park service should irrigatanother year
DEATH TO THE ALIEN

DEATH TO THE ALIEN

Tamarisk Eradication in Grand Cany

Tamarisk Eradication in Grand Cany

Grand Canyon Grand Canyon Wildlands Wildlands Coun

Coun

Grand Canyon National Pa

Grand Canyon National Pa

Arizona Water Protection Fund Contract N

Arizona Water Protection Fund Contract N
PROJECT DESCRIPTION

•Compliance•Assessment of tamarisk infestation, demograp•Develop and train staff, accompanied by num•Run several teams / trip for 4 trips (more trips •Cutting, pulling, or girdling tamarisk, and imm

spray-applying Garlon

•Monitoring in Year II (2003) and Year III (20•Reporting•Continue to encourage the NPS to develop a p

program in other tributaries and along t
CONTEXT OF THE CONTROL PR

•Coupled with pilot stand replacement at Lee•Most tributaries in Grand Canyon have low d

of mature tamarisk plants

•These densities have accrued over 70 yr•Tamarisk can be killed by manual applicatio•Eradication of tamarisk from these tributarie

set back the invasion by 10-50 yr

•This should be enough time to develop and i

tamarisk management plan for the CR 
C

Professional Guides

Umpteen Volunteers PAR
MECHANICAL CONTR
APPLICATION OF GAR
HAULING BRUSH
Tamarisk Treatment By Size Class

4043

9797

42477

0

10000

20000300004000050000

Seedling Sapling Matu

Size Class

Number of Tamarisk

Tamarisk control efforts in 2002-2003 resueradication of 56,317 tamarisk from 65 trib
Tamarisk Treatment By Method

132

671

136

726

36117

0

5000

1000015000

2000025000300003500040000

Pulled

Inject

Cut / Girdle

Girdled

Basal Bark

Method

Number of Tamarisk

Figure 2. Tamarisk Control by Method
Size Class

# 

Tamarisk 

Retreated

# Initial 

Tamarisk

Treated

Seedling 1376 42477 

Sapling 1168 9797 

Mature 1019 4043 

Total 3563 56317 

Tamarisk Re-treatment to D

Percentage by Size Cla
Total Tamarisk Retreated

0

5000

1000015000200002500030000350004000045000

Seedling Sapling M

Tamarisk Size Classes

Number of Tamarisk 

# Tamarisk Retreated # Initial Tamarisk 

Tamarisk Re-treatment to Da

– Numbers by Size Class
CONCLUSIONS

Tamarisk can be controlled or eradicated from 

contained within Grand Canyon

Tamarisk cannot be eradicated in mainstream

greatly limited

Resolution of WIFL and other compliance issRestore Goodding willow to river corridor
#### HELEN WINKLER, *ET AL.,*PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY, *ET AL.,*DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS.

See same case below: 66 *N. J. Super.*22.

*Messrs. Kisselman, Devine, Deighan & Montano*and *Mr. Michael Patricio King*for the petitioners.

*Messrs. Armstrong & Geller*and *Mr. Walter L. Smith, Jr.;*for the respondents.

May 15, 1961.

Denied.