alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>6
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED 
FROM THE FORM 10-Q AS OF JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY 
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>1
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-22-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                   0
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                           0
<ASSETS-OTHER>                     45,000
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>              232,609
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    277,609
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>         321,167
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>               321,167
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                         0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>          190,942
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>               2,345
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>               2,345
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>               0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                  0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                 0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>         (234,500)
<NET-ASSETS>                      (43,558)
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                       0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                       0
<OTHER-INCOME>                      1,890
<EXPENSES-NET>                    (45,683)
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>           (43,793)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                0
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>               0
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>             (43,793)
<EQUALIZATION>                          0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>               0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                   0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>             2,345
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>             0
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                     0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>            (43,558)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                 0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>               0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                 0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>              0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>               4,690
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                   (45,683)
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>              (21,779)
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                   0
<PER-SHARE-NII>                       (26)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                 0 <F1>
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                    0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>               0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                    0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                    82
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                         0
<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING>                  0
<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE>                    0
<FN>
A zero value is used since the change in net unrealized fair value is 
not allocated to Investment Managers and Investors as it is not 
taxable.  Only taxable gains or losses are allocated in accordance with 
the Operating Agreement.
</FN>

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

INNOVATIVE METAL DESIGNS, No. 03:15-cv-00560-SB

Plaintiff,

v. 

 

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ORDER

a Minnesota corporation; and HANADI

ACHOUR, an individual, 

Defendants.

HERNANDEZ, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Beckerman issued a Findings and Recommendation (#22) on November

18, 2015, in which she recommends that this Court grant Defendants' motion to dismiss. The

matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were

timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v.

Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt,

840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate

1 - ORDER

Case 3:15-cv-00560-SB Document 25 Filed 12/20/15 Page 1 of 2
Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de

novo, I find no error. 

CONCLUSION 

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Beckerman's Findings & Recommendation [22].

Accordingly, Defendants' motion to dismiss [11] is granted. Plaintiff may file an amended

Complaint consistent with the Court's findings and Rule 11, within 10 days of the date of this

Order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this day of , 2015.

 

MARCO A. HERNANDEZ

United States District Judge

2 - ORDER

20 December

Case 3:15-cv-00560-SB Document 25 Filed 12/20/15 Page 2 of 2
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Patrick Shawn Elizondo, * From the 244th District Court

of Ector County,

Trial Court Nos. C-20-0630-CR,

 C-20-0631-CR, & C-20-0729-CR

Vs. No. 11-21-00173-CR * February 23, 2023

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Williams, J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Cotton Ginning Research: Las Cruces, NM
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Las Cruces, New Mexico Cotton Ginning Research People & Locations







Branyan W Sanxter
                        Cotton Ginning Research

                        




                        
                        Engineering Technician
                        Phone: (575) 526-6381
                        
                        
                        Fax: (575) 525-1076(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JA NUARY 29, 2019

NO. 03

- 18

- 00086

- CV

Craig A. Washington, Appellant

v.

Commission for Lawyer Discipline, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 335TH DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY

BEFORE J USTICES GOODWIN, BAK ER, AND SHANNON

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE SHANNON

This is an appeal from the judgment revoking probation and suspending appellant from the

practice of law for three years

, signed by the tr i a l court on December 5, 2017. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error in the

judgment . Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s judgment

. A ppellant shall pay all costs

relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Northwest Irrigation and Soils Research: Kimberly, ID
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Publication Reprints
                    Other NWISRL Links
                        NWISRL Publications
                                    Imperfect SSR Finder
                                    Shiny App ServerSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Kimberly, Idaho Northwest Irrigation and Soils Research People & Locations







Jessie  Clark
                        Northwest Irrigation and Soils Research

                        




                        
                        Biological Science Technician (Plants)
                        Phone: (208) 423-6598
                        
                        
                        Fax: (208) 423-6555(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1999.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      13,694,966
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,465,503
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (203,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,373,530
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            22,929,232
<PP&E>                                      19,027,954
<DEPRECIATION>                             (9,220,067)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              45,295,285
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       31,319,831
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        302
<COMMON>                                        17,084
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,151,147
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                45,295,285
<SALES>                                     58,502,836
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            58,502,836
<CGS>                                       56,393,181
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               56,393,181
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (6,277)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,115,932
<INCOME-TAX>                                   120,250
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,995,682
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,995,682
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10


</TABLE>
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

VICTOR IGBINEWEKA,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 08-50008

D.C. No. CR-07-00209-JSL(1)

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

J. Spencer Letts, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 30, 2010** 

Pasadena, California

Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, O’SCANNLAIN and GOULD, Circuit 

Judges.

Under the terms of his plea agreement, Igbineweka waived the right to

appeal his custodial sentence. See United States v. Martinez, 143 F.3d 1266, 1271

FILED

SEP 01 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
page 2

(9th Cir. 1998). The government didn’t breach the agreement or waive his waiver,

nor did the district court advise Igbineweka that he could appeal that part of his

sentence. The agreement permitted him to appeal the amount of restitution, but he

didn’t object to the “actual loss” calculation in the presentence report. The district

court was therefore entitled to treat it as a finding of fact. Fed. R. Crim. P.

32(i)(3)(A). We do not review the ineffective assistance claim on this direct appeal

because the record is insufficient to evaluate it. See United States v. Jeronimo, 398

F.3d 1149, 1155–56 (9th Cir. 2005).

AFFIRMED.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kenneth Pyne, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Pitaro, J.), rendered May 23, 1985, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

*721A man wearing a bag with cut-out eye holes over his head and carrying what appeared to be a rifle wrapped in plastic, entered the grocery store where the complainant was working and demanded that he be given money from the cash register. At the defendant’s trial, the complainant testified that the bag and eye holes were too big and that she was able to see the robber’s hair, eyes and cheekbones as he shifted the bag in place. When he leaned towards her to pick up some loose bills, she could see the lower portion of his face through the eye holes. She recognized the robber as the defendant, who was a regular customer in the store and whom she had noticed looking into the store on two occasions earlier that day. The defendant’s girlfriend testified on behalf of the People that the defendant had told her of his plan to rob the store and that he was going to use a bag with cut-out eye holes and a stick wrapped in a piece of carpet. Later that same evening, he told her that he had robbed the store and showed her the money from the robbery.

The defendant argued that the complainant’s husband’s testimony concerning her reaction upon seeing the defendant in the store a month after the robbery improperly bolstered the complainant’s identification testimony. We agree. Similarly, the testimony of a police officer that he arrested the defendant after a conversation with the complainant’s husband constituted improper bolstering. Nevertheless, the admission of this testimony was harmless error since the proof of the defendant’s guilt was overwhelming *(see, e.g., People v Johnson,*57 NY2d 969).

We also conclude that the trial court erred in refusing to charge the jury on accomplice testimony, given that different inferences could be drawn as to the girlfriend’s role in the robbery. However, that error was harmless under the circumstances of this case since the girlfriend’s testimony was corroborated by the complainant, who provided independent testimony linking the defendant to the commission of the crime *(see,*CPL 60.22 [1]; *People v Glasper,*52 NY2d 970; *People v Sawyer,*107 AD2d 1045).

We find the defendant’s remaining contention to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Brown, Eiber and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarter Report of B-Teller, INC., (the “Company”) on Form
      10-QSB for the year ended July 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Armando Russo,
      President and J. A. Claydon, Secretary, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      That
      to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





B-TELLER,
      INC.




By /s/
      Armando Russo


**President**




By
/s/ J.
      A.
      Claydon


**Secretary**


June
      5,
      2006
Exhibit 10.15

Simple Promissory Note

$29,066.84

In the City of Fort Bragg, County of Mendocino, in the State of California, on the 17thday of April 2006 on demand, Thanksgiving Coffee Company, Inc. promises to pay to the order of Paul Katzeff and Joan Katzeff the principal sum of Twenty-nine
thousand sixty-six dollars and eighty-four cents ($29,066.84) payable in payments of $1,000 each per week with a final payment of $1066.84. Interest to be paid monthly at 12% on the average daily balance of the previous month paid on the fifteenth
day of the following month, beginning on the 15thday of May 2006 and continuing said principal and interest have
been paid in full.

Obligee/Maker of Promise



|                                                                            |  |  |  |             
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ------------
|                                                                            |  | 
|/s/ Joan Katzeff                                                            |  |  |  | May 24, 2006
|Joan Katzeff, President Officer, Thanksgiving Coffee
Company, Inc. Borrower |  |  |  |             
|                                                                            |  | 
|/s/ Paul Katzeff                                                            |  |  |  | May 24, 2006
|Paul Katzeff, Lender                                                        |  |  |  |             
|                                                                            |  | 
|/s/ Joan Katzeff                                                            |  |  |  | May 24, 2006
|Joan Katzeff, Lender                                                        |  |  |  |
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Pest Management Research: Sidney, MT
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    NPARL
                        Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory
                                    Agricultural Systems Research Unit
                                    Grasshoppers: Their Biology, Identification and ManagementSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Sidney, Montana Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory Pest Management Research PMRU Docs Grasshoppers: Their Biology, Identification and Management: Outbreak and Survey Info





- NPARL Home
- PMRU Home
- ASRU Home
- Site Highlights
- Outbreak and Survey Info
- ID Tools | Apps
- Grasshopper Management
- IPM Handbook
- USDA Research | Contact Info

Outbreak Info: 2017 Adult Grasshopper Survey Mapheadline bar  Return to Outbreak Info


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov