47474 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 25, 2021 / Notices 

6See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; 

Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 

39263 (July 6, 2011), as amended in Enforcement 

and Compliance; Change of Electronic Filing 

System Name, 79 FR 69046 (November 20, 2014) for 

details of Commerce’s electronic filing 

requirements, effective August 5, 2011. Information 

on help using ACCESS can be found at https://

access.trade.gov/help.aspx and a handbook can be 

found at https://access.trade.gov/help/ 

Handbook%20on%20Electronic%20

Filing%20Procedures.pdf. 

7See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service 

Requirements Due to COVID–19, 85 FR 17006 

(March 26, 2020); see also Temporary Rule 

Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to 

COVID19; Extension of Effective Period, 85 FR 

41363 (July 10, 2020). 

8See CBP’s EAPA 7496 Letter at 5. 

9See Memorandum, ‘‘Request for Establishment 

of Administrative Protective Order: Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Orders on Common Alloy 

Aluminum Sheet from the People’s Republic of 

China: (A–570–073/C–570–074),’’ dated August 18, 

2021. 

1See Stainless Steel Bar from India: Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

sheet within the scope of the orders 

includes both not clad aluminum sheet, 

as well as multi-alloy, clad aluminum 

sheet. With respect to not clad 

aluminum sheet, common alloy sheet is 

manufactured from a 1XXX-, 3XXX-, or 

5XXX-series alloy as designated by the 

Aluminum Association. With respect to 

multi-alloy, clad aluminum sheet, 

common alloy sheet is produced from a 

3XXX-series core, to which cladding 

layers are applied to either one or both 

sides of the core. 

Common alloy sheet may be made to 

ASTM specification B209–14, but can 

also be made to other specifications. 

Regardless of specification, however, all 

common alloy sheet meeting the scope 

description is included in the scope. 

Subject merchandise includes common 

alloy sheet that has been further 

processed in a third country, including 

but not limited to annealing, tempering, 

painting, varnishing, trimming, cutting, 

punching, and/or slitting, or any other 

processing that would not otherwise 

remove the merchandise from the scope 

of the orders if performed in the country 

of manufacture of the common alloy 

sheet. 

Excluded from the scope of the orders 

is aluminum can stock, which is 

suitable for use in the manufacture of 

aluminum beverage cans, lids of such 

cans, or tabs used to open such cans. 

Aluminum can stock is produced to 

gauges that range from 0.200 mm to 

0.292 mm, and has an H–19, H–41, H– 

48, or H–391 temper. In addition, 

aluminum can stock has a lubricant 

applied to the flat surfaces of the can 

stock to facilitate its manufacture of 

beverage cans. Aluminum can stock is 

properly classified under Harmonized 

Tariff Schedule of the United States 

(HTSUS) subheadings 7606.12.3045 and 

7606.12.3055. 

Where the nominal and actual 

measurements vary, a product is within 

the scope if application of either the 

nominal or actual measurement would 

place it within the scope based on the 

definitions set for the above. 

Common alloy sheet is currently 

classifiable under HTSUS subheadings 

7606.11.3060, 7606.11.6000, 

7606.12.3090, 7606.12.6000, 

7606.91.3090, 7606.91.3095, 

7606.91.6080, 7606.91.6095, 

7606.92.3090, 7606.92.3035, 

7606.92.6080, and 7606.92.6095. 

Further, merchandise that falls within 

the scope of the orders may also be 

entered into the United States under 

HTSUS subheadings 7606.11.3030, 

7606.12.3015, 7606.12.3025, 

7606.12.3030, 7606.12.3035, 

7606.91.3055, 7606.91.3060, 

7606.91.6040, 7606.91.6055, 

7606.92.3025, 7606.92.3060, 

7606.92.6040, 7606.92.6055, and 

7607.11.9090. Although the HTSUS 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the scope of the 

orders is dispositive. 

Filing Requirements 

All submissions to Commerce must be 

filed electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance (E&C)’s Antidumping Duty 

and Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS), 

unless an exception applies.6 An 

electronically filed document must be 

received successfully in its entirety by 

the applicable deadline. Note that 

Commerce has temporarily modified 

certain of its requirements for serving 

documents containing business 

proprietary information.7 Each 

submission must be placed on the 

record of the segment of the proceeding 

for each order, i.e., for the AD order (A– 

570–073) and the CVD order (C–570– 

074). 

Letters of Appearance and 

Administrative Protective Order 

Interested parties that wish to 

participate in these segments of the 

proceedings and to be added to the 

public service lists for these segments of 

the proceedings must file a letter of 

appearance in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.103(d)(1), with one exception: The 

parties to EAPA investigation 7469 

publicly identified by CBP in the 

covered merchandise referral referenced 

above (TKA and AA Metals) 8 are not 

required to submit a letter of 

appearance, and will be added to the 

public service list for these segments of 

the proceedings by Commerce. 

Commerce placed an APO on the 

record on August 18, 2021,9 and 

established the APO service lists for use 

in these segments. Commerce intends to 

place the covered merchandise referral 

letter on the records of these segments 

in ACCESS within five days of 

publication of this notice. 

Interested parties must submit 

applications for disclosure under the 

APO in accordance with the procedures 

outlined in Commerce’s regulations at 

19 CFR 351.305. Those procedures 

apply to these segments of the 

proceedings, with one exception: APO 

applicants representing the parties that 

have been identified by CBP as an 

importer in the covered merchandise 

referral (referenced above) are exempt 

from the additional filing requirements 

for importers pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.305(d). 

Dated: August 18, 2021. 

James Maeder, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2021–18282 Filed 8–24–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–810] 

Stainless Steel Bar From India: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2019–2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that the sole 

mandatory respondent made sales of 

stainless steel bar (SS Bar) from India 

below normal value during the period of 

review (POR) February 1, 2019, through 

January 31, 2020. 

DATES: Applicable August 25, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Konrad Ptaszynski, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office I, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–6187. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On February 24, 2021, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register the 

Preliminary Results of the 2019–2020 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on SS Bar from 

India.1 We invited interested parties to 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 25, 2021 / Notices 47475 

Review; 2019–2020; 86 FR 11235 (February 24, 

2021), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum (Preliminary Results). 2See Venus Group’s Letter, ‘‘Antidumping Duty 

Investigation of Stainless Steel Bar from India— 

Venus Group Case Brief,’’ dated March 26, 2021. 3Carpenter Technology Corporation, Crucible 

Industries LLC, Electralloy, a Division of G.O. 

Carlson, Inc., North American Stainless, Universal 

Stainless & Alloy Products, Inc., and Valbruna 

Slater Stainless, Inc. (collectively, the petitioner). 

4See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Stainless Steel Bar from 

India Petitioners’ Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated April 2, 

2021. 

5See Antidumping Duty Orders: Stainless Steel 

Bar from Brazil, India and Japan, 60 FR 9661 

(February 21, 1995) (Order). 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of 

Stainless Steel Bar from India; 2019–2020,’’ dated 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 

notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 

7 In the Preliminary Results, Commerce 

inadvertently stated ‘‘. . . , we will instruct CBP to 

apply an ad valorem assessment rate of 30.92 

percent to all entries of subject merchandise during 

the POR from the Venus Group and Ambica.’’ See 

Preliminary Results. We intended to state that we 

will instruct CBP to apply an ad valorem 

assessment of 30.92 percent to the Venus Group, 

and instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate 

entries for Ambica without regard to antidumping 

duties. 

8See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of 

the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty 

Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103 

(February 14, 2012). 

comment on the Preliminary Results 

and on March 26, 2021, Venus Wire 

Industries Pvt. Ltd., Hindustan Inox, 

Precision Metals and Sieves 

Manufacturers (India) Pvt. Ltd. 

(collectively, the Venus Group) 

submitted a timely filed case brief.2 On 

April 2, 2021, the petitioners 3

submitted a timely filed rebuttal brief.4

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the 

antidumping duty Order 5 are SS Bar. A 

full description of the scope of the 

Order is contained in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum.6

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs filed by interested parties 

in this review are addressed in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. A 

list of the issues that parties raised, and 

to which we responded in the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum, follows as 

an appendix to this notice. The Issues 

and Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is made available to the 

public electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly on the internet at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. 

Rate for Non-Selected Respondent 

We preliminarily applied a rate based 

on the rate calculated for the only 

company not selected for individual 

examination, Ambica Steels Limited 

(Ambica), in the 2018–2019 

administrative review (i.e., 0.00). No 

party commented on the Preliminary 

Results regarding the rate for the nonselected company. Therefore, for these 

final results, we continue to assign 0.00 

percent to Ambica. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on a review of the record and 

comments received from interested 

parties regarding our Preliminary 

Results, and for the reasons explained in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum, 

we did not make changes to the 

Preliminary Results. 

Use of Adverse Facts Available 

Pursuant to sections 776(a) and 776(b) 

of the Act, Commerce continues to base 

the Venus Group’s dumping margin on 

total AFA because it failed to provide 

information requested by the applicable 

deadlines. For the reasons explained in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum, 

we have continued to apply an AFA rate 

of 30.92 percent to the Venus Group. 

Final Results of Administrative Review 

As a result of this administrative 

review, Commerce determines that the 

following dumping margin exists for the 

period February 1, 2019, through 

January 31, 2020: 

Producer/exporter 

Dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Precision Metals, and its affiliated companies including Hindustan Inox, Precision Metals and Sieves Manufacturers (India) Pvt.

Ltd .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 30.92 

Rate Applicable to the Following Non-Selected Company: 

Ambica Steels Limited .................................................................................................................................................................. 0.00 

Disclosure 

Normally, Commerce discloses the 

calculations performed in connection 

with final results of an administrative 

review within five days of any public 

announcement or, if there is no public 

announcement, within five days of the 

date of publication of this notice of final 

results in the Federal Register, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

However, because Commerce applied 

total AFA to the only mandatory 

respondent under review in accordance 

with section 776 of the Act, there are no 

calculations to disclose to any interested 

party. 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce 

has determined, and U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries of subject merchandise in 

accordance with the final results of this 

review. Commerce will instruct CBP to 

apply an ad valorem assessment rate of 

30.92 percent to all entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR from the 

Venus Group. Because the rate assigned 

to Ambica is zero,7 Commerce will 

instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate 

entries without regard to antidumping 

duties.8

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication in the Federal Register of 

this notice for all shipments of SS Bar 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the date of 

publication as provided by section 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
47476 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 25, 2021 / Notices 

9See Notice of Final Determination of Sales at 

Less Than Fair Value: Stainless Steel Bar from 

India, 59 FR 66915, 66921 (December 28, 1994). 

1See 19 CFR 351.225(o). 

2See Notice of Scope Rulings, 86 FR 28751 (May 

28, 2021). 

751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit 

rates for the companies subject to this 

review will be equal to the dumping 

margin established in the final results of 

the review; (2) for merchandise exported 

by producers or exporters not covered in 

this review but covered in a prior 

completed segment of the proceeding, 

the cash deposit rate will continue to be 

the company-specific rate published in 

the completed segment for the most 

recent period; (3) if the exporter is not 

a firm covered in this review, a prior 

review, or the original investigation but 

the producer has been covered in a prior 

completed segment of this proceeding, 

then the cash deposit rate will be the 

rate established in the completed 

segment for the most recent period for 

the producer of the merchandise; (4) the 

cash deposit rate for all other producers 

or exporters will continue to be 12.45 

percent, the all-others rate established 

in the less-than-fair-value investigation 

for this proceeding.9 These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this POR. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of the antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of doubled antidumping 

duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to an administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subject to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

Commerce is issuing and publishing 

this notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: August 19, 2021. 

Ryan Majerus, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and 

Negotiations. 

Appendix 

Issues and Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. List of Issues 

III. Background 

IV. Scope of the Order 

V. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and 

Adverse Inferences 

VI. Analysis of Comments 

Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should 

Continue to Apply Total Adverse Facts 

Available to the Venus Group 

Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should 

Continue to Apply the Rate Applied to 

Mukand in the 2010–2011 the 

Administrative Review as the AFA Rate 

to the Venus Group 

VII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–18281 Filed 8–24–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Notice of Scope Rulings 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Applicable August 25, 2021. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) hereby publishes a list of 

scope rulings and anti-circumvention 

determinations made during the period 

April 1, 2021, through June 30, 2021. 

We intend to publish future lists after 

the close of the next calendar quarter. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Marcia E. Short, AD/CVD Operations, 

Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

202–482–1560. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Commerce regulations provide that it 

will publish in the Federal Register a 

list of scope rulings on a quarterly 

basis.1 Our most recent notification of 

scope rulings was published on May 28, 

2021.2 This current notice covers all 

scope rulings and anti-circumvention 

determinations made by Enforcement 

and Compliance between April 1, 2021, 

and June 30, 2021. 

Scope Rulings Made April 1, 2021 

Through June 30, 2021 

People’s Republic of China (China) 

A–570–112 and C–570–113: Certain 

Collated Steel Staples From China 

Requestor: Zhejiang Best Nail 

Industrial Co., Ltd. Eleven models of 

insulated staples (JY01–01–JY11–01) are 

not covered by the scope of the 

antidumping or countervailing duty 

orders on certain collated steel staples 

from China because they are collated 

using plastic insulators which creates a 

distinct space between each staple in 

place of glue, adhesive, or paper tape; 

April 5, 2021. 

A–570–979 and C–570–980: Certain 

Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells 

From China 

Requestor: The Solaria Corporation 

(Solaria). Solaria’s PowerXT 

photovoltaic cells and modules 

manufactured in the Republic of Korea 

(Korea) are included in the scope of the 

antidumping duty order on solar cells 

from China and the antidumping duty 

order on solar products from Taiwan 

because Solaria’s solar cells are 

completed in China and Taiwan with a 

functioning p/n junction and imported 

into Korea for module assembly, a 

process that has already been 

determined to not substantially 

transform a cell to change its country of 

origin; April 8, 2021. 

A–570–967 and C–570–968: Aluminum 

Extrusions From China 

Requestor: Reflection Window + Wall, 

LLC. Four window wall kits are not 

covered by the scope of the 

antidumping and countervailing duty 

orders on aluminum extrusions from 

China because they meet the exclusion 

criteria for finished goods kits; April 26, 

2021. 

A–570–900: Diamond Sawblades and 

Parts Thereof From China 

Requestor: Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) (Enforcement and 

Protect Act (EAPA) referral). Diamond 

sawblades produced in Canada by 

Protech Diamond Tools, Inc. (Protech) 

with Chinese cores and Chinese 

segments, which are: (1) Exported by 

Protech and imported by Gogo 

International, Inc, (Gogo); or (2) 

exported by Gogo are covered 

merchandise subject to the antidumping 

duty order on diamond sawblades and 

parts thereof (diamond sawblades) from 

China; diamond sawblades produced in 

Canada by Protech with Chinese cores 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES