Exhibit 15

Case 3:14-cv-01772-MO Document 33-29 Filed 04/10/15 Page 1 of 37
,xEOnd, 

a' 's $=: r" rr~i PROTECTION AGENCY

0460 

5

% rao& 

,.' -

'MEMORANDUM SEP 3 0 'I997 OFFICEOF ' 

ENFORCEMENTAND 

COMPLLANCE ASSURANCE 

SUBJECT: General Policy on 

FROM:, Bany Breen, Director 

Office of Site .. .. .. 

TO: Regional Counsel, Regions I-X' . .. . . 

Regional Enforcement Coordinators, Regions I-X t . . . .. ' . . .. Director, Office of Site Remediation &'Restoration,Re& I 

Director, Emergency & Remedial Response Division, Region I1 ' . .' x. 

Dikctor, Hazardous Waste Management Division, Regions 111& E 

Director, Waste Management Division, Region IV . .

Director, Superfund.Division, Regions V, VI & VII . . Assistant Regional Administrator, Office of Ecosystems Protection & 

Remediation; Region.VllI 

Director, Office of Enviromiental Cleanup, Region X 

This memorandum &smits a policy document developed by the Office of Site 

5 Remediation Enforcement (OSRE) that explains what is necessary for an acceptable ability to 

Fay (ATP) settlement in Superfund cases. The main text of the policy document addresses' 

general issues that apply to the ATP process and ATP settlements. The policy document also 

contains two appendices that addre'ss issues specific to making ATP determinations for 

.'individualsand business.es; 

.. The policy document is'directed primarily toward Office of Regional Counsel (ORC) and . ' 

Superfundenfokement program staffwho handle cases involving AT�-issues. It should also be 

useful for poteatially'responsible parties (PRPs),who believe that they are unable to pay their ' ". ' share of Superfund cleanup costs, as well as for other PRPs at sites where ATP claims are raised. . . . . .. . . , . 

.. This.policy document is the second Superfund ATP document issued by OSRE. In May .. 1995 'OSEEissued a"short sheet" guidance document, entitled "Overview of Ability to Pay 

I ' Guidance and Models," which describes policies id models relevant to Superfund ATP .. . . analyses. . . . . 

, The policy document establishes an ''undue financial hardship? standard for detemining 

a party's ability to pay its shak of Superfund cleanup costs, and uses a two-part analysis.to . . 

, . , .. .. .. . . 

.. . . . 

Rr)rcl.dlRTychbla.Phl.d '4th v.p.ublm 01&Ine on loOK R&W Papst (40% Poamnsunrr) 

.. 

Case 3:14-cv-01772-MO Document 33-29 Filed 04/10/15 Page 2 of 37
determine what is an acceptab1e.Al-P settlement amount. The fikt part of the analysis, called the 

“balance sheetphase,” looks at the assets,’liabilities,.and owners’ equity of the ATP Candidate,’ .. 

calculating the amount of money available from excess cash, the sale of assets that are not 

ordinary &d necessary, borrowing against assets, and owners’ equity. . , 

The second part of the analysis, called the “income and cash flow statement phase,” looks 

. at the.income and expenses of the party and generally calculates “available income” for a 

’. Superfund settlement 0ver.a five-year period. In calculating “available income,” the analysis 

’ ’ takes.into account.“increased futurene6ds” @e.,ordinary and necessary expenses that will be 

incurred by the ATP Candidakthat have not been incmd in the past or that were incurred 

previously but which are expected to be significantly greater than in the past). 

A work group composed of representatives hm regional, headquarters, and Department ’ 

of Justicedlices helped to develop the policy document. This policy is intended to apply ’

outside of a formal bankruptcy contexA because the banluuptcy laws provide.other.mechanisms ,

to.protect.debtors from.undue financial hardship or to allow viable businesses to recrganize.. .If 

you have any questions concerning this document, please contact OSRE’s Policy and Guidance . , Branch at (202) 564-51 15. . . ,. 

. . Additional copies of thisdocument can be ordered &om the National Technical . ’ . . .. . 

Information Service (NTIS), US.Department of Conyierce, 5285 PortRoyal Road, Springfield,. ‘VA22161. Each order must reference theNTIS item number,.PB97-199731.For’telephone 

orders or further informationon placing an order, c$l NTIS at (703) 4874650 or (800) 553-’ 

‘ ’ NTIS. For orders via E-maMnternet, send to the following address: orders@ntis.fedworld.gov. 

Enclosure. . ’ 

.I , . 

cc: Steve Herman, OECA 

SteveLuftig,OS\hiER ’ , 

Linda Boornazian, OSRE , : I 

Sandra CoMon, OSRE 

.. ’ . ’ 

Charles Breece, OSRE 

Lori’Boughton,OSRE ’ 

.,. , .. .. , .. . 

.. . I 

Bob Kenney;OSRE .- , ’ 

L.ik Friedman, OGC . .. 

. . . . 

.. .. . . . 

. . 

’ ’ ’ Eacl sal0;oGc 

Joel Gros,.DOJ 

, . B.mceGelber,DOJ. . 

Karen Dworkin, DOJ 

Superfund Ability to Pay Work Group . . ’. 

’. Superfund Ability to’PayContacts : ., 

. . 

, .. 

. .. 

. . 

.. 

Case 3:14-cv-01772-MO Document 33-29 Filed 04/10/15 Page 3 of 37
-- 

.. .. _.. > '. .I' 2 , 

. . I 

GENERAL POLICY ON SUPERFUND 

ABILITY TO PAY DETERMINATIONS 

INTRODUCTION 

. ' This do'cumentprovides a generai po1ic.y framework for 

settlements in which a party's.financia1ability to pay is a .. 'significantconsideration ("ATP'settlement")under the 

Comprehensive Environmental Response;Compensation and Liability

Act (ilCERCLA'o' or ".Superfund"): The United States may enter into 

ATP 'settlementswith individuals and businesses for recovery.of 

response costs and performance..ofcleanup work in appropriate 

cases. '.Thepurpose.,of this policy is to provide .guidanceto EPA 

enforcement personnel, affected.parties,.andthe public on.the 

information that EPA will.look. at in evaluating proposals to.;: 

enter into an ATP settlement, and.the steps that Agency personnel

should follow in evaluating a ,party's inability.to.pay claim. .. ., 

. . The ATP settlement process'1s reserved'for..busiriess . .' .. .potentially-responsibleparties-('PRPs") ,whodemo.nstrateto EPA's ' 

, satisfaction that payment of the .amount.soughtby the government

is likely to put a company out of.businessor,otherwise

jeorjardize its v'iability,and for both business and'individual : 

PRPS who demonstrate to.theAgency that payment of such an amount 

is likely to create an undue financial hardship. The ATP '. settlement process may provide for a reduction in the proposed

settlement to an amount that is not 1ikely.tocreate an undue 

financial hardship. &I undue financial hardship occurs if, in 

the opinion of EPA, satisfaction of the environmental claim will 

deprive a PRP of ordinary and necessary assets or cause a PRP to 

fie,unable,topay'for.ordinaryand necessary business expenses . . 

, ~ 

and/or ordinary and necessary livifig expenses. . . 

This document first presents a general overview of ATP 

settlements. It',thendiscusses the types.ofanalysis that should. 

be conducted in a-case-where-an ATP settlement has been requested

by a PRP, and generally describes how EPA.enforceaentpersonnel

working on a Superfund case.and,where applicable, 'Departmentof ' , Justice (DOJ),staff ("the.ca'seteam") should determine,an amount 

that represents the ability of a Particular'PRPto pay for .. .' response 'costsor work (,"ATPamount!'). This document does not 

cover the final settlement amount't.hatthe Agency should accept. , 'Theremay be situations,inwhich.ability;topay is not the.only

factor.on which the settlement is based. 1. 

. . 

This document.also. includes -appendicesthat address 'ATP ' . 'issues arising in settlements with individuals (Appendix A) and 

businesses (AppendixB) . -These'appendicesprovide .supplemental. , 

information on the.analysi.9 of 'ATPclaims and 'thedetermination. 

of ATP amounts.forindividuals and bus,inesses..Although.

Appendix B was'developed primarily to expedite the processing of , 

AT9 claims by small businesses, its .principlesapply to business 

Case 3:14-cv-01772-MO Document 33-29 Filed 04/10/15 Page 4 of 37
. . 

.. entities of all sizes. ' The Agency believes,that providing in 

.AppendixB. a written description,ofthe'standards and procedures

. , that it will.use-in making determinations on'ATPclaims by

busines.sentities wil'lbe especially helpful \for small entities 

that may not have access ,to.sophisticatedf.inancia'ladvisors,.. ,. 

. ., 

., . ' Appendices A and B should be read in conjunct.ionwith the 

main~bodyof this.policy document ,whendetermining the ability to .. '.payof these.parties in Superfun3 cases. the^ appendi,ces.do .not 

discuss each step of the,ATPanalytical process, so readers . . should.relyon the main.bodyof the policy statement for,afull 

description of this process.

J ,. 

' PURPOSE 'OF'ABILITYTO FAY SE-S . ., . I

In any case in which EPA is considering an ATP settlement, 

it must consider a number.of competing interests.; On the one 

:liand,,'the'Agencyis charged with ensuring that hazardous waste . 

sites are cleaned up,, that money spent from the'superfund is , 

, . restored',and that.those.responsible for contamination pay an 

appropriate .shareof cleanup costs. On'theother hand, many

individuals and businesses have'limitedresources'with.which to,.

satisfy the government"s cl'aims. As the district court recently .,

noted in United States v. Bav Area .Batte*,.095.F.,Supp.1524 

(N,D.Fla.19951, the government must.be afforded the leeway to : 

take ability.topay into account in fashioning settlements under 

CERCLA. In particular, it must consider the impacts-of any

settlement on the busine'ss or individual in a way that recognizes

the value of permitting a functioning:business to'continue as a 

'productive component of our economy earning money a,ndemploying

workers, and which demonstrates compassion for individuals and,

their.unique circumstances. . . .. . . "ATP settlements .maybe utilized to balance two interests:,'. 

(1) that a PRP sat'isfiesits 1iabilit.yassociated with the 

cleanup of an,environmentalproblem; and (2) that payment of,the

1iability.doeS.not,createan.undue financial hardship'forthe PRP 

or, where the PRP is a.natura1person, for those dependent.onthe .. . PRP'. ~ : , .. I . .. . .. I.. 

~. . Early ,identificationof .anundue'financial hardship will 

preserve.the financial resources:of the government,.the settling . PRP ("theATP Candidate"), and other PRPs for cleanup a,ctions.by

reducing transaction costs. .EPA does,not.consideran,ATP

se'tt1,ementfor.response-costs,as relieving.thesettling PRPs from 

any.,oth'erobligation'they have under the law,. including their'.. .. .. .. .., 

.. lDependents should generally include:only tho'sep,ersoris.. ' . 

.lawfullyclaimed as such by the PRP on'its.mostrecent federal 

income tax return., : I 

, 

.. .. . . . . .. 

, . 

. .. .. . , .~ .. .. 

, . 

'. 2 

Case 3:14-cv-01772-MO Document 33-29 Filed 04/10/15 Page 5 of 37
. .. I .. . ,u; , 1 .,.,, . , ,.:.. 

obligation to.allow access or pro'vide <informationto help

facilitate-the Superfund process. , . 

' 

EPA seeks.,torecover'monies expended from the Superfund by

either obtaining a court judgment against a.PRPfor',theUnited 

State's response costs at a'site or by settling with a PRP for an' 

appropriate share of the response costs'ata site. EPA ' -

determines an appropriate settlement amount,fora PRP based on a 

variety of consjderations that may include the volume of wastes 

contributed to a'siteby the PRP, the nature of the wastes 

contributed by the.PRP,,the degree of the PRP's cooperation, and 

in some 'casesthe PRP's ability to pay': This reflects the fact 

that ignoring a PRP's. ability to pay may, in certain situations, 

not only impose'anundge financial hardship on the PRP but may ., 

also reduce or eliminate important'benefitsthat the PRP provides 

to the community. .. . 

'. .I 

. ' 'myabklity to pay settlement should be based on the .~, 

I ' particular facts,andcircumstances of the case. However, it is. 

important that.,the,'hgencyemploy a generally consistent approach'' to evaluating.claimsof inability to'pay.. Accordingly, this ' . . . . 

policy sets forth a framework for conside.ring.:suchclaims,,,along . 

with procedures that the regions should follow where'a PRP .' 

asserts that it h+s a.'limitedability to make a.substantial . . ' . . 

..contributionto the costs of.cleanupor to the reimbursement of,:'

the'government's past response costs. 

. . ' > 

CONDITIONS UNDER WHICHEPA WILL CONSIDER A CLAIM OF UND~JE 

FINANCIAL HARDSHIP . , 

Although the ATP settlement process.is based largely on .the I financial condition o'f .theATP Candidate, other conditions should 

also.be met as part of the settlement. Among the factors that 

should be 'presentto proceed with an ATP settlement are the.. . ,

'following: , . .. . ,. 

. . . 1;. 'Thesettling party has met'.itsburden of demonstrating that'. 

the payment of.the'ful1amount sought by EPA is likely to .. 

.createan undue financial ..hardship. , . .

. . .. . ,' 

- ,. ' . 'The.burdento..demonstratethe 1ikelihood.ofundue financial. . . hardship.rests.with the ATP Candidafe, rather than with the 

Agency, in CERCLA cases. The ATP Candidate wil1:be required to' 

provide adequate information to subs.t,antiatethat payment of the 

amount~EPAseeks.islikely ,tocreate an.unduefinancial hardship.

The;Agency need not consider t,herequest made by th'e.ATP .-

Candidate for an.ATP settlement.unless EPA has received al'l '. 

: 'Interim CERCLA Settlement Policy, 50 FR 5024 (.February5,;

1985) .. .. I 

. . 3. ... .. . .. .. .. 

. . I 

. .. 

.. .. . 

Case 3:14-cv-01772-MO Document 33-29 Filed 04/10/15 Page 6 of 37
. . 

.. . . . . , . 

i.equested..financial'information from,the ATP Candidate. 

Furthermore, any'PRPwho is attempting.to settle'vnderthe AT? 

process,maybe required to assist EPA.in defending the 

settlement, if the settlement is challenged; The Candidate 

should recognize that it may be required to authorize release 'of' .. 

.. financial information necessary,to defend the settlement. 'Where 

''appropriate,the Agency will be ,willingto address . . confidentiality issues by seeking to obtain protect'iveorders,.in . . 

camera-review; .. or similar techniques. ! 

.'. '2. . The.settlement should not release the"ATP Candidate from . other . site-'relatedresponsibilities. . . 

The ATP,Candidate should not.be released from other site- ' ' 

related responsibilities; including the duty to pro,vide.the : 

necessary.informationand.sit,eac.cess,to.as.sistwith the.cleanup

and enforcement:activities. .' ., . , . . . , . . _. , .. ,. 

3. .,The,ATPCandidate must.-requestthe,ATP Settlement. ,, 

,. Although EPA-may encourage ,partiesto seek".an"ATP. . 

settlement,'.the,.ATP'Candldate-must request the.ATP settlement and 

must attest that.the payment of.a greater amount,'islikely to. .' 

create an undue.financia1hardship. The ATP Candidate must alsq

certify to the truth and accuracy of the financial information 

that has been submitted. .. , ,, . , 

4'. An Ability to Pay halysis,must consider the'entire~ , ' 

,financialposition of the ATP Candidate. \ . ,. 

., ,. 

The demonstration.of an''unduefi'nancial hardship must be 

based on an analysis of the ATP Candidate's entire financial 

situation and not just some portioc of the ATP Candidate's. 

holdings..'Theanalysis .shoul&include an ATP:Candidate's'ability 

to obtain-supportfrom other.entities that may be legally.

responsible for'satisfyingthe environmenta1,obligations of.the',. 

ATP.Candidate. . In addition,,'EPA should review.and analyze the . . fac.tsand consequence.s..relating. to all material -transfersof 

'property,by the ATP Candidate,subsequent .tonotice of po.tentia1 . . liability from EPA.. . . .. ~ ,' .. ,. .. .. . , 

'I. . 5. 

' . each Person as'defined under CERCLA. ". 8 . 

,

.., \. ' ', 

.An ATP Settlement is entered,on'an individual 'basiswith. . . . 

' The covenant not,to sue and contribution protection offered 

by.,kheATP settlement applies'onlyto the ATP Candidate that. I 

'demonstratesan undue financial hardship.'.,Forexample, in the , ' case of a corporation, tikcovenant and contribution protection.., 

.should,generally not extend 'toother PRPs such as a .corporat.e

i. parent or corporate shareholder (unless.theirassets and 'income, 

are included.within the ATP analysis and they,arecontributing to

'thesettlement1.. . . . I .. ., , .. 

' 4 

.. . . . . '< . .. .. 

Case 3:14-cv-01772-MO Document 33-29 Filed 04/10/15 Page 7 of 37
.. . . I .. . . 

,. .J . ~' <( 'i.3 . .: ,'t3''t .'j.,; ', 

6. The ATP Settlement -isin additiowto expenditures that"are I .

recoverable.from other sources. '. -. , 

., The settlement .agreementshould .requirethe ATP Candidate.to' 

disclose'theability of the ATP;Candidate to recover expenses

associated with the Site..'Thismay include sources such as 

insurance recoveries, indemnification agreements, contribution 

.actions,and increases in property ,values resulting from cleanup

activities. The ATP settlement should.considerthe funds 

available.from the'seactivities.. Unless the ATP Candidate . ' .. 

demonstrates that no recovery from these.sources will occur, the 

settlement agreement should .provide.for payment of a percentage . , . i of recovered expenses to:the United States. j 

7. The .ATP'Settlementshould seek'to'resolve all of the ATP Candidate's 1iability.forresponse costs at the site. .. 

,. . . . ,, .,. .&I ATP'settlement should seek to.reso'lve'all financial , . :. issues associated with the ATP Candidate's liability for,'respo,nse . 

costs at the site. A settlement that does not fully resolve 'the 

environmental claim against the ATP Candidate may leave,theATP . . 

Candidate exposed to a burdensome contribution claim. The case. 

team'and the ATP.Candidate should estimate the effect of the. \ 

settlement on potential contribution claims (and similar claims,

s.uch'as those .relatedto indemnification agreements),made by'

other PRPs'at the,,site..TheATP Settlement should ,bevery clear' .. 

in identifying.whatthe ATP settlement wil1,resolveand what 

litigation exposure (if any) remains for the ATP Candidate. 

INITIAL REVIEW ,-

The ATP'anklysisutilizes past and present financial 

information to evaluate the present .andpredict the future 

financial condition of the party being analyzed and its ability, 

to pay.for a cleanup. The ATP analysis requires enough ' 

information,to.support a determination'as to whether the proposed

settlement.is,likely to creat,ean undue financial hardship.'; 

'. Generally,.the Agency should request that each ATP Candidate:. . '. 

(business or individual) submit federal income tax returns.for . . 

the five most recent-yearsand a completed financial , ' questionnaire..' Similarly, the"Agency should also generally

request five'years of financial'information (audited, if' available) from businesses that are ATP Candidates... I . 

- . . . .. * ., 

' The case team should consult with the financial,ana1ys.t . : 

-whowill.be reviewing the ATP Candidate's financial information .. 

to ensure that all relevant information.is.reques,ted. Copies,of .. .financial questionnaires developed by Region 9 for this purpose: , 

are attached to this policy 'document as examples of r,e.quests.' for ., 

,. ' % financial information relating to ability to pay settlements with ' 

individua1s:and businesses., .. .. 

5 . . , .. . . 

.. I . . - . ,. ,. 

.. . . .. 

.. 

Case 3:14-cv-01772-MO Document 33-29 Filed 04/10/15 Page 8 of 37
.. . '. L

Additionally, other information; as .determinedappropriate by

EPA; .shouldbe reviewed. This may i.nclude'information.relevant, 

to the financial condition of the ATP,Candidate.thatis submitted 

by the ATP Candidate itself or by other PRPs at a site, or that . ,

is obtained from disinterested third parties '(e.g.,Dun and 

Bradstreet reports). . ~. I. 

EPA's .analysisshould characterize .the'financial condition 

of the ATP.Candidate. 'This analysis should consider the,ATP

Candidate's complete financial'condition. In,reviewingfinancial(

information, the case:team should be .alertfor facts.relating,to

transfers of property by the ATP Candidate -particularlythose, , . subsequent to the notice of potential liability. from the Agency.'

.Thecase team should not limit its analysis to the evaluation of 

the.ATP Candidate's assets.,lipbilities, income,.arid'expenses.

It.may also be appropriate.to look'torelated sources, incluaing

income and'as'setsthat are not',inthe ATP Candidate's name but 

which might:,beavailable,tothe ATP Candidate. Not all.such 

income and assets should automatically.beconsidered available,to, 

the ATP Candidate, but they should be treated.aspotentially I 

relevant 'tothe analysis. .. . .. 

, . . . REVIEW OF *ATP'SETTLEMENT'REQUESTS . ' 

.. , . , . . , . 

The 'Regions.should implement a consistent approach for- ..' .. 

gathering financial information. '.Itis suggested that a.' 

screening.processbe developed to identify ATP candidates who., " ' I 

have provided adequate financialAnformation to determine their 

ability to pay the proposed settlement amounts and those that 

will be requ'i'redto provide additional financia1,informationfor,

this purpose;.'It would'alsobe helpful to .developa process to 

differentiate between situations that clearly require the . '. . 

assGstance of a.. financial analyst'andthose'that do not.... . I . .. 

When conducting the'ATP.analysis, the case-team will need to 

have available a team member who,,isqualified.toexpress opinions' 

on the financial information that is submitted. .Although;the 

case.team'has,theprimary responsibility to make dete'rrninations. . 

relating'to a Superfund.settlement, the case team should.relyon. ' . 

.the'.opinionexpressed by a person qualified to.conduct a 

.financial-analysiswhen determining whether or not a.settlement . 

amount is likely to create an undue financial hardship. . . I . . 

USE OF COMPUlk MODELS I 

. , , 

,E~~..has.,a variiety .of'computer that assist with an ATP , .

'analysis'. Included among these mode1.sare the ABEL.,andSuperfund 

ABEL models for the!analysis of ATP claims.of for-profit b.usiness' 

entities...Inthe.near fwture, EPA will be issuing additional 

'computermodels'that wil1,assistin evaluating ATP claims for- . , ' 

individuals'arrdmunicipalities. The.,Agencyis'also developing', 

manGal.fi'nancial'screening protpcols ( "protocols") that do , ,not . . 

., , "1, ''. 

.. . . . . .. .. ... . I . I 

.. .. ... 

.. .. ,. . . ,. 

, . .. 

Case 3:14-cv-01772-MO Document 33-29 Filed 04/10/15 Page 9 of 37
..... , :,I _ 7.;. -: .

!k .,. L. ..A. . .. . . . -.. ,. .. 

. require -very.muckiinput,.and.that.may be particularly'\usefulin 

screening-ATP claims made by a large number of PRPs at a 

Superfund-site. .. 

These computer models and protocols, which require the input

'of financial information, are'useful in evaluating..financial

'strengthsand weaknesses of a PRP. However, they lack the 

capabil.ityto evaluate the quality of.the.financialinformation' 

'and to consider ,allaspects of'aPRP's financial condi,tion 

necessary to make financia1,projections. Due to these 

'limitations.,'-computer'modelsand'protocolsshould be used in 

screening and prioritizing ATP settlement requests but should not 

-,be the basis for entering into,anATP settlement. The opinion of 

the case team in-conjunctionwith the opinion of a financial .. ' 

analyst.shouldbe the basis for.the ATP settlement. 

. . . . . ~RIFIca~I.0~ .. 

,. After,'theinitial 'review,the financial information shou.ld 

.be verified. The purpose of the verification process is to 

determine if the information can be relied upon to express an . 

opinion concerning the effect of.the'proposed.settlementamount 

on the ATP Candidate. .. 

< ' 

Informatioti.thathas'been submitted should be'verified and. ', 

the explanation of any.discrepancies documented. This 

verification may require that the ATP Candidate produce receipts

for large or unusual expenses,.submit-anappraisal report'to

verify the value of an asset purchased or.sold, and submit other 

documentation to 'substantiatethe financial-information provided

by the ATP Candidate; . The amount of .substantiatingdocumentation 

for the ATP settlement is-based ,oncase.spe,cificneeds. The size .. of the business and the.complexityof the financial picture of 

the business or individual ATP Candidate are important factors in 

determining what is needed to v,erify.theinformation. It is 

'anticipated.that,in every instance, EPA should perform some 

minimum verification prior to accepting information .assubmitted. , In the event.that the verification process identifies significant 

. . ' contradictions within the financ.ia1 information.,it may be . . 

, .appropriate.topreclude any fur.therconsideration of an ATP .,. settlement with this candidate.. . ' 

.. . . . . 

When estimating borrowing capacity, EPA.shoulddetermine if: 

the.ATP .Candidatehas.overstatedits liabilities. . Questions

relating to.the status of a liability should be documented'anda 

determination.concerning,thepriority of the liability in . 

comparison to the environmental claim should be made. . . . '. . . . . . .. 

The ATP Candidate should also be required to certify that 

the ATP Candidate .has, made a ,full,and ,.accuratedisclosure of

.financialinformation: The certification'can'bein the form of a. 

signed statement from the ATP Candidate that is similar.to; 

-, . ,. . . .. .. .. 

Case 3:14-cv-01772-MO Document 33-29 Filed 04/10/15 Page 10 of 37
any material .respect,inaccurate. 

, . '. In general, after receiving adequate financial ,information , . . .and verifying the information, the.caseteam should conduct an 

evaluation of the ATP Candidate's'ability to pay. : This will . . 

generally involve a two.-phase.'examinationprocess. ,First,the ' ; 

' . Region should analyze the ATP candidate's ability to make an upfront payment. .Thisanalysis is based primarily.ona review of '' 

,. 

.. 

.. ,. t 

'BALANCESHEET.PHASE .. . . . 

The balance sheet phase .includes'a review of the'assets,

liabilities, and owners' equity of 'anATP Candidate'. The'balance 

sheet is a financial report that displays the assets,

liabilities, and,'owners'equity,ofa business as of a specific

date (e.g.,. the end of a fisc'al..year) . -sets include cash,.cash

equivalents,.accountsreceivable; hventory, and fixed a,ssets:

.Liabilitiesinclude accounts payable, interest payable, notes , . 

payable,.andtaxes. Liabilities-maybe.current (expected to,be'

paid within.one year),or long-term (exp.ectedto .be paid in .more' 

than'one year). Owners,'equity'(or shareholders' , . -equity)is.the

'dififerencebetween.assets,andliabilities, and includes 

contributed capital (amounts:directly.investedby the,owners')'and . " 

retaingd .earnings (profits that:have not been paid.out to the 

owners). -'.. .. 

.

. .

.

. . 

. 

. . 

,. . , 

The..balancesheet.phase should produce a dollar estimate 

'that.isthe sum.of (1).excess cash;'(2,) funds available from the 

.saleof assets.thatare'not ordinary and necessary; (3) increased 

borrowing capacity; and'(4)funds available from owners' equity. .. .. . . I .. 

" T.he.asset holdings of the,ATP Candidate-should 'beexamined 

..SQ as not to deny.theATP Candidate ordinary and.necessary , . I 

assets. .While.protectingordinary and..necessaryasset.s.,EPA ,. 

recognizes that the ATP Candidate may,alsopossess assets that' ' ' . 

are'not ordinary .and'necessary. These assets m,ay'be,sold or , . 

. . . . 

Case 3:14-cv-01772-MO Document 33-29 Filed 04/10/15 Page 11 of 37
.. 

borrowed agains,twithout the ATP Candidate incurring an undue 

financia1:hardship. In addition, there may be cases where 

borrowing against ordinary and necessary assets by an,ATP

Candidate is appropriate. This issue is addressed more , .. 

. specifically inithe ap,pendices.forindividuals,and businesses. 

1 

, In making a determination regarding whether an asset is' - ordinary and necessary, EPA relies on the 'information (both

written and oral) provided .bythe ATP Candidate using the 

.followinggeneral g&delines: ' 

e.' Businesses:-For a business, an asset is ordinary and 

necessary if it ,is.currentlyused for..thebusiness .. .. 

. 'purposeof the entity,..This would include.,for , , 

,example,manufacturing equipment that relates to the . product line(s) of the business. 'Itwould not include 

property owned by the business that is intended for .. 

, , investment purposes.' .~ 

a Individuals--Foran individual, an asset is ordinary 

.' .' and necessary if it provides for a need of the..ATP,

Candidate or those dependent on him/her.. Examples of.. :;

such assets are provided in Appendix A: Property

holdings that'are nvt held for the purpose of 

generating needed income or that do not provide for 

,suchneeds may not be ordinary and necessary. .. . Assets identified as not ordinary-and'necessaryshould be 

examined to determine the value 'thatcan be obtained from selling

and/br borrowing on the asset.. . ,. . . ., 

.' If the ATP Candidate has not established why an,assetis 

,ordinaryand 'necessary,andif.the asset has significant value,

the estimated net value of.the asset should.be included.inthe . ' 

ATP est,imate. If .otherfactors'(e.g.,'reluctanceof banks to . . : 

lend to a.Superfund.PRP).prevent the ATP Candidate from borrowingon the asset, strong consideration should.begiven to settling .. based'on the estimated net sase'valueof assets that have been 

.'' . identifi'ed'as not ordinary and necessary. -, 

.' After estimating the amount available 'from assets that are 

not ordinary.andne.cessary,the potential of the.ATP Candidate to 

borrow is detehined. To do~.thisEPA'needsto determine what .' assets, if any, are secured by:existing ,borrowing;what ' .. . . 

liabilities are identified on loan applications; and the extent 

to which the potkntial release from liability was considered.ill % 

the lender's decision to lend funds to;the settlor. . . 

;. In assessing.the ATP Candidate's borrowing capacity,'the 

.loanperiod should,generally be estimate3 basea'on the:facks and 

circumstances of each case. In making this estimate; factors'to 

be considered..should-includethe type of asset to be borrowed .. I 

.. .. .. 9 

.. 

. . . . . . 

.. . . 

~~ 

Case 3:14-cv-01772-MO Document 33-29 Filed 04/10/15 Page 12 of 37
~~ 

, ~~,~-~ ~~ ~ 

I . I~ ' , . , , . *' , ,

.. 

/ . 

.. ' . , . ­

acainst, the ATP Candidate's equity i.n the asset, and other 

relevant factors (e.g.,age .and in'comeof an.individual ATP : Candidatej. . . . . 

The balance Sheet phase should ensure that,the ATP Candidate I, will h.-vefunds avaklable to repay any loan,made for purposes ,of 

an ATP settlement. If the incoce statement phase indicates that ' , there may not be adequate income available to make periodic'loah. ' payments'needed'to. fu.llypay t5e sewlement amount.,the amount 

."that can,be borrowed and applied toward the settlement amount, , ' should be.reducedto reflect the ATP Can.didate's ability 'torepay

a'loan. However, .if t,heincome st'atementphase suggests an I '

inability to repay a loan, the balance sheet phase should still . . 

include the estimate of funds obtained from the'sa.le.ofassets . . . I. 

,that(arenot ,ordinaryand .necessary. .. I , . 

I .. , . 

Owners''equity should al,sobe analyzed as a'potential source ', 

. .> ' of ATP,.settlement'funds.. This part,of the balance sheet analysis

should'look.at.twoprimary c'omponents: dividends and capital .' 

. . contributions. . . .. , . 

Dividends are periodic pabents by a .company'.to its owners' , (i.e:, .shareholders).. .Financialsta.tementsand tax returns'' ' , 

. , I , . shouldbe examined to determine whetlier div.idends have been .: 

issued to shareholders by'th.e.ATPCandidate, particularly those : ' , issued subsequent,to notification of its CERCLA liability. If 

so, the ATP Canaidate should be asked how such dividends were 

issued in l'ight,ofthe entity's claimed inability to pay.the' proposed Superfund settlement amount. Absent 'extenuating , . 

circumstarices, the ,amountof .suchdividends-.shouldgener,allybe' 

included in the ATP amount'. Payment ,of,future dividends!,mayalso 

bel restricted.. in the ATP settlement agreement. 

Capital ,contributionsare investments 1n.abusiness made,by, ~ 

its owner(s).' The balance.sheet phase.of the ATP 'analysis should . ' 

also,evaluateon a case-by-casebasis whether additional capital'

contributions.shouldbe included in the ATP amount. ' 9 . . . 

INCOME AND CASKFLOW STATEMEN+ P,HASE .'. 

.. 

' Ih evaluating'the amounts that 'anAT,P'Candidatecan'afford , . I 

to pay over time,.Regions'should pay particuXar.att'entionto the 

in'comeand cash flow statements of the ATP Candidate. This 

analysis looks at the revenues.(income) and expenses of the ATP 

Candidate over time: . This analysis attempts to predict future 

earning potential and.to ,identifyordinary and necessary .future . .. ' 

expenses,.baaed on a review"of,financialstatements from prior 

years, budgets and .projections (if provided),,.and lkkely .futur'e., . 

events,. As previously stated, the.goa1of'an ATP settlement is, 

,toallow a business PRP to remain'a,going .. concern and to.prevent. I 1 j , . . . , .I 

/I 

,, 

.. , . 

10 . . . . .. . . . ,. ,.' 

. .. 

Case 3:14-cv-01772-MO Document 33-29 Filed 04/10/15 Page 13 of 37
. .. ., ,i 

. . 

an individual PRP 'fromsuffering undue'financialhardship.

Excess available cash flow should form the basis for ATP payments 

over time. 

The income statement and .cash.flow phase includes review of 

revenues and expenses reported over.several successive years; . The income statement is a financia1'report.thatshows revenue and 

profit-making activities over a period of time, typically a 

fiscal year. Revenues me,asure.the-inflowof assets, while . .. 'expensesmeasure the outflow or'using up.of'assets. Net income . . indicates an increase in assets and owners' equity during a time 

period,.while net .loss'indicatesa decrease. Changes in revenues 

and expenses from year to year should be,examinedto determine if .. I 

a trend exists and.if there is an explanation f,orthis trend. If . : 

a trend 'is identified, �inancia1 projection should reflect the . I. .. . , impact of the trend. 

" . Total sources of ,revenue sh6uld be examined to determine:if 

they.are'stated correctly.andto make sure that they have not 

been undervalued. A similar review of expenses should be made ,to .. . 

determine if a'trendexists, if expenses have been overstated, ". 

and/or if the need for the expense.has not been.establ,ished.

Questionable revenues and-expensesare to be discussed with the. 

ATP Candidate and may result in adjustrnentsto the income 

statement estimate. When adjustments are .made.,the'rea.sonfor '.

. the adjustment should be documented in the case file. 

After the examination of prior -revenuesand expenses, any ' . 

Increased Future Needs identified by the ATP.Candidate should be . 

.exami.ned. Increased Future Needs are'ordinary and necessary

expenses.thatwill be,incurredby the ATP,Candidate that have not 

.been incurred in the past that were incurred previously but 1 .areexpected to be significantly greater than.in'the,past. When 

estimating.IncreasedFuture Needs, the ATP Candidate must explain

the reason why payment of these'expensescannot be deferred.fora 

limited period of time. Examples.of Increased Future Needs are.:,' 

. 

. . 0 .Businesses-'-.Estimatedenvironmental expenditures that 

are to be incurred in.thenext five years. However; in 

limited'and appropriate cases,.theATP.settlementmay . . . require'additionalpayments if the estimated 

environmental expenditures are nbt made. .. 

.. ,0 ' . 'Individuals--Asignificant decrease in revenues;ur a 

' significant increase in expenses that will be incurred 

' within the next five years, such as.a change in an. . . individual's financial situation caused.by retirement: .. .. .. 

,. . The next'step'inthe income and cash flow s'tatement phas.e is . . to calculate the differenoe between the*projectedrevenues and . . ,ordinaryand necessary expenses (including any Increassd Future' 

Needs and debt servicing on,anyadditional borrowing determined. 

Case 3:14-cv-01772-MO Document 33-29 Filed 04/10/15 Page 14 of 37
I

I : 8. 

. . 

. . . . I " appropriate iri the balance sheet phase of the analysis.)'during

the'next five years ("AvailableIncome"). The Available Income. 

sho'uldbe compared with the proposed settlement amount. If the , 

Available Income is greater than the settlement amount.,there 'is 

I no undue financial hardship and no reduction.basedon an.ATP I' .cl-aimshould be allowed. If Available Income is less than the 1 

.. settlement amount, the ,differencebetween these two amounts- . .

.'sho'uldbe included with the ATP estimate. 

.. The Ag::.ncy 'shouldnormally require an ATP.'Candidate to .. ,, direct'five years of Available Income toward payment of.the 

proposed .settlementamount. 'However,the.numberof years of 

'Available Income may be changed when circumstances warrant. 

1. Examples.of such circumstances,include the followkng: : 

i 

The revenue and expense projections for an ATP Candida'te,:are', ' 

too erratic-toallow for any certainty in the future cash . . projections. .Insuch a situation, the settlement may need.' 

'torequire payment of a percentage,of future earnings .for . . more than five years:. 

A business is in.the'processof a major capital .' 

restructuring 'thatwill result in.atemporarydeferral of '. 

.. profits. In such a case, the analysis 'may.needto include a 

greater number of years.ofAvailable-Income0r'consider.the' 

.. use of an alternative method to.,'estimatethe value of the 

restructuring.. ', 

, , 

An individual has a:veryvaluable asset that produces only 

minimal income. In such.acase, .theanalysis may need to, ..

inc1ude.agreater number of years of Available Income or . . consider the.net sales value of the asset in.the calcqlation

of a settlement.amount. :~ 

. . The' fact pattern associated with .eachATP'Candidate's. 

financial position may.require deviation from the five year: ,' ' 

estimate'. This'deviationmay b& in the fo'mof a reduction or 

increase in.the number of years-offut,ureincome that is '. 

considered. 'Itmay.also,includeconsideration of.the sale value . . of 'an,income-producing'asset instead,oflimiting the review to 

income provided by 'theasset.:,Theexplanation for t.hechange in 

,the,estimate should.bepart of the documentation.requirements; .. . . 

If the case team determines that an ATP settlement'should' 

include payments over'time, an interest factor should be applied 

to all payments except the up-front payment: . Interest should.be 

applied at the Super.fundrate, which changes annually and can be i 

obtained'ibycontacthg Charles.Young of the.'FinancialManagement

'Division,,Office of.the Chief Financial Officer .(202-564-4914).

In addition, the Region should 'determinewhether.setilement 

payments made over time.can,besecured by personal guarantees

from owners.of.afi,ATPCandidate business (particularly if.it is 

1 .' 

Case 3:14-cv-01772-MO Document 33-29 Filed 04/10/15 Page 15 of 37
known that an owner has significant personal assets) and/or

through unencumbered assets (i.e., assets that have no 

outstanding liens or pledges against them). 

ESTABLISHMENT ., OF THE ATP AMOUNT

my type of credit analysis; including the assessment of a .. 

ATP Candidate's ability to pay Superfund cleanup costs, involves ' , 

many judgments with regard to issues like what constitutes an 

ordinary and necessary asset or expense, what projected future 

earnings and.available.cashflow are likely to be; and whether a'' ,. 

capital expenditure can be .reasonablydelayed. It,is important

for the case,teamand'theanalyst to,obtainnecessary information . 

from.thebusiness entit'yor individual pertaining to these , . ,

difficult decisions in order to reasonably a'rriveat'an . ) appropriate ability to pay determination. '. 

. Once the case.team is assured that all requested financial ' .'. 

'..informationhas'been obtained .andanalyzed, Available Income (as

defined above).,amounts available from estimated borrowing

capacity, amounts available from.the'saleof assets that are not . . 

ordinary and necessary, and amounts available.from'owners'.equity.

should be identified and added together. This sum should'thenbe 

reduced by an appropr.iate.safetyfactor to reflect the :. 

uncertaintkes in making predictions for a specific ATP Candidat& 

and to provide for unexpected events. The safety factor can be.3 

Percentage adjustment, a dollar estimate or some other adjustment.

that is appropriate to,theanalysis and should be determined on a 

case by case basis. The amount produced.by this step is the , . 

estimated ATP amounr. Another quick review of the ATP 

Candidate's financial situation should be conducted to assure 

that the analysis is complete and accurate. .If.this,re,view

indicates that the.ATP Candidate.canpay the estimated ATP , 

amount,,that amount should be recommended as..the ATP amount.' If 

the'rev,iawdoes not produce such a'result, the estimated ATP ' , 

amount 'shouldbe .revisited. 

. , 

: .. Once the ATP amount has been established,'EPA should.seek. 

'. settlement rapidly since the financial'condition-ofan ATP 

.Candidate.maychange. If there is an extended delay between the 

analysis .+nd the settlement,'the financial condition of the ATP ,. Candidate.maychange.and EPA's informat'ionmay be stale. ~. .. . 

"In evaluating the amount that an ATE Candidate can afford to 

pay in a settlement, one consideration is how the payment will be 

,structured i.n the settlement agreement, namely a one-time'payment 

versus installment payments. For example, an ATP.Candidate's 

.abilityto generate .futureincome may be used to fund installment'. .< 

.. . 

4 Any,ATP settlement'recommendationin a case involving the .I. ' . 

Department of Justice is subject to DOJ approval. .. 

. .. 13 

Case 3:14-cv-01772-MO Document 33-29 Filed 04/10/15 Page 16 of 37
,. 

. . , t 

payments over time, or it may be used to support borrowing to 

fund an up-front payment. If..thereis borrowing capability,.the .. 

amount aa~ilable..to'fundan up-front ,paymentis increased by the 

ability to borrow. However, servicing the ,additionaldebt , (payment of principal and interest) rnustcbe factored into the 

income and cash flow phase of the analysis, and reduces the 

availability.of funds in tliat,phas%e. c 

., 

The ATP amount should generally be payable upon settlement. 

Vnder appropriate circumstances, however, the settlenent may

provide for insta1,lmentpayments. When considering installment 

payment options.,the case team should keep in.,mind.theadvantages

and disadvantages of such pahents, including the .potential of an, ', 

increased ATP amount, the risk of default, and. . the administrative

burden on'the Agency. . . 

.. .

:. 'Generally,' the Agency should'not structure ,paymentsover a

period longer than five 'years;, There'riaybe times when a '.. .. ' 

settlement is more appropriately structured over a"shorter periad

of time. For example, .if it is determined that.anATP Candidate',

has a specific.large cash need..beginning in the.,fourth year after.: 

settlement and that therefore extending a paymenf beyond three .' 

years'would not like.lyresult in significant additional payment.' 

amounts, the payment'periodcould.tklimited to three years. 

SHARING THE RGVIEW ', 

Onc'e an appropriate ATP,amount is determined, the 

conclusions of the ATP analysis should be shared with the ATP . , 

Candddates. After a discussion of the ATP amount.andthe basis 

for the amount;the ATP Candidate should be allowed to respond to 

the analysis and to submit additional financial information.. If 

the information.submittedby the'ATP Candidate is new and 

significant, .. it may result in changing the ATP amount; If it

does not, negotiations may proceed provided the ATP Candidate 

.agreesto the ATP amount. .. . .. .. , .. .

WCDKE~ATION OF THE DECISION . . .. ._ ,. 

.'.Thecase team,should,document.the ATP decision in Superfund

settlements. Under.CERCLA,costs not recovered'from one' PRP may

be recovered from other P,RPs. Because an ATP settlement.i& . .. predicated.on, among other consid8rations;a PRP'.s financial. 

ability to pay, it has the potentiaLto affect the settlement .. . ,. ., 

. . 

.. SAgency pe.rsonne1should generzlly not.provide a copy..of. any

?+BEL or other computer model ana1ysi.sto an'ATPCandidate unless 

the analysis indicates an ability to pay the full amount sought ", 

by the government. For further..informationon this subject,..the.. 

ABEL User's Guide (or,other'appropriatecomputer modex user's .: " 

guide) should be consulted;. .. .. .. .. 14. 

. . .. . , 

.. 

. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. I. . .. .. , 

Case 3:14-cv-01772-MO Document 33-29 Filed 04/10/15 Page 17 of 37
.. 

1 . . 

. . . . 

amount to be'paid by'other PRPs. Therefore, it is important fpr

the case ,t.eamto document the basis for.th'eATP set'tlement,

.-including-.identifyingand-maintainingcopies,of all documents ' , , 

' reLied upon in conducting the ATP'analysis as well as preparing a 

narrative explanation that describes the analysis. This ATP 

documentation.is not part of the administrative'recordfor ; 

response selection and is not subject to National'Contingency

P,lan (,"NCP")re+irements relating.to the Administrative Record. 

�or Response Selection. ,, 

DEVIATION'FROM THIS MEMORANDUM 

Each'p'erson.s.financial condjtion is unique: Accordingly, , ', . ' 

. . if the specifics of the financial position of a.PRPare not 

applicable to the assumptions contained-inthis'widance,an ATP . ' 

Settlement may be reached'on ocher.grounds, but should be clearly 

'. .. documented .andelevated to the appropriate management official .. ... for approval. . . . . .. 

*'* *-• *,* 4't t t t *:* t t ** *.*'*.* t i * ' .

*. ,' 'f :

* NOTICE: .,Thispolicy is not a rule; and does not create any 

+ legal obligations. The extent to which.EPAapplies the policy:

will depend,.onthe facts of each case. .t 

.. 

*~'*++r+'r.**itt+cr*t.+**i'r,+t'**t*r~**t~ .. 

.. , 

. I 

I 

. . . - .. 

.. 

1 . . .. 

.. ... 

.. 

. 15 .. 

Case 3:14-cv-01772-MO Document 33-29 Filed 04/10/15 Page 18 of 37
APPENDIX A: INDIVIDUAL ABILITY TO PAY DETERMINATIONS 

" ' , , ,

APPLICABILITY. 

' ', For purp'osesof this appendix,.an.individua1is a natural', 

person.; Individuals include sole proprketors and non-corporate , 

general partners in a part'nership. However, this..appendix'does

not"app1y .to limited partners',in a partnership,because ,their

liability, like that ,ofshareholders ,ina corpqration, is 

generally limited to the amount of their investment.6 .. 

The:ability .topay'of a partne'rship­that ,hasboth limited 

.andgeneral partners should be.evaluated'intwo stages. First, . financial . resources of the partnership .shouldbe assessed.

Second, if the resources 0.f.the.partnership entity'are ,' . inadequate, the .financialresources of the general,partner(s) ,, 

{but not those of.the limited'partner(s)) should then be assessed 

to determine whether these.resourc.escan make up the shortfall. 

If the general partner(s) is an individual, 'the.policyset forth 

' in this appendix on individual ability,topay determinat'ions 

should'befollowed..'If the general partner(s1 is a .corporation,

the policy set forth in Appendix B on business ability to..pay : 

.. , determinations~shouldbe followed. . . . . 

PURPOSE.OF 1,NDIVIDUALABILITY TO 'PAY.SEdS ' .' 

.. . . , 

It is not EPA'sintent to'.depriveindividuals or their 

dependents of ordinaqcand necessary assets or-jncome.'For this 

reason, �PA may enter into an ATP settlement.with an-individual ," 

PRP (the "ATP Candidate").if the ATP Candidate demonstrates that 

the payment of the proposed settlement amount'is.likely to create 

an undue'financialhardship. . If EPA's analysis .ofthe financial. 

condition of the.individual ATP Candidate identifies available,

"funds that exceed the proposed settlement amount.,.there should be - no ATP 'Settlement. . . 

' INITIAL'.REVIEW ,. .. . , , . . . 

The'ATP Candidate.should provide suffkent financ,ial ' ~ 

' . information.upon,whichEPA can'basean ATP settlement decision. . .Generally,.. the.ATP,Candidate should provide..the five most recent .' 

years 0f:individualfederal incorne.taxreturns and should ' . . .. complete a..financialquestionnaire..E'PAmay request additional 

information. ' This may include',loanapplications, financial. 

information.relating to businesses owned.by,the ATP,Candidate;', . . 

and the fair market value bf assets owned by the .. ATP Candidate. . , 

.. .. 

.. .I. . . . 

'However, there-may'be,cases where limited partners.ana . ' . 

shareholders participate so heavily in the business that they are ~ 

liable in.their personal capacity and this appendix would apply: . 

,I 

Case 3:14-cv-01772-MO Document 33-29 Filed 04/10/15 Page 19 of 37
'* ' . 

EPA sho'uldnot limit its analysis .tothe evaluation of the 

ATP aCandi4ate's assets, earnings and expenses. It may.alsobe 

appropriate to examine other sources of funds available to the 

ATP Candidate. This may include income and assets not in the 

name of the ATP candidate but that,areavailable to the ATP 

Candidate,,suchas income from, and assets in, trusts and other 

related entities as well as the financial holdings of the.ATP . Candidate's spouse. -Notall such income and.assets.should . ' 

automatically be considered available'tothe ATP Candidate, but 

they should be treated as potentially relevant to the analysis., 

. . .Theinitial review shoula characterize the financial. 

condition-of.theATP Candidate in terms of income and net worth. .. The initial review .hay.include: , , 

1) Comparison'' of ,the' ATP'.Candidate'sincome and expenses.to ' national and'local averages; and 

2) Estimation of the percentage.'of.income.applied'to debt. .. 

. , By conducting 'the.initial characterization, EPA may then : 

,estimatethe extent of the financial hardship.that would be 

imposed upon,the ATP Candi.dateif required to pay the proposed.

settlement amount. If this amount is not likely to.create an .. 

undue.financia.1hardship,'EPA should suspend the analysis,. .., . 'pendingan explanation from the,ATP Candidate as to why payment ' 

of the proposed settlement amount is likely to create an undue ', 

financial hardship. 

VERIFICATION ' ' 

. , 

,. 

Verification of.theATP Candidate's financial information is 

often the most labor-intensive'aspectof an ATP analysis for an 

individua'l. Although businesses and 'municipalitieshave 

available a variety of .infohationrelating.torevenues,

expenses','assets and liabilities, many individuals have only . 

. . copies of income tax returns. Furthermore, businesses and 

municipalities are experienced at explaining their financial '\ positions--individuals,rarelyhave a need to do..so. The:case' , team 'shoulduse the 1east.intrusivemethod of inquiry consistent 

with'adequatelyanalyzing.anindividual ATP Candidate's ability 

to pay. , -Forexample; the number of 'people that participate in .' 

financial'discussions with the individual ATP Candidate should.be 

kept.to a minimum. 

BALANCE SHEET PHASE 

'. . The .balancesheet.phaselooks at-'theassets, l'i.abilities.,. 

and owners: equity.ofthe individual ATP Candidate. Asset , ' 

holdings generally fall 'into'oneof two,categories:.(1) assets 

required to meet the.ordinary,andnecessary needs of the ATP . . 

Candi.date and those dependent on 'theATP Candidate;.(2) other 

.. . . 17 ,, , . ,. . . . 

. . .. ,. I . 

.. 

. . , .. .. 

. .. .. . . 

Case 3:14-cv-01772-MO Document 33-29 Filed 04/10/15 Page 20 of 37
, . , , 

. ' assets. Inquiries should be made as'.tothe proper "classification 

of:assets'owned'.by the individual ATP Candidate. Assets of ' ' . .,. 

limited value; however, may be excluded from this phase,of the 

analysis. ,I 

Assets requ'iredto provide'forordinary and neGessary needs­

.include the:personal residence,..vehicles needed for 

transportation,,clothing,and other .personalpossessions that can 

be accurately attr-ibutedto providing for.theneeds of:theATP . , 

.Candidateand those dependent upon,theATP,Candidate. Unless the , , Agency.determinesthat these assets,arenot ordinary and . - . ' 

necessary for the ATP Candidate or that there exist unresolved. 

issues''concerningquestionable transfer(9) of,the ass'ets.,,these 

a.ssets should be'excluded from the ATP analysis and the 

requirement to determine.'-a.fair market value.for them should be'' , .: 

I. L . 

.' eliminatsd. 1 , 

, 'I .. '. ." A.preliminary review of assets.required to provide for 

I . . ordinary and necessary needs should.be 'performedto ensure.that " . 

. 'they.arenot misclassified. If the-assetsare not'.ordinaryand 

necessary, EPA may calculate an ATP . . amount based on:' .. > , 

' 1.' Requiring the . . ATP ,Candidateto sell the asset(s)'; . .: , . 1.. 

I 2. . Requiring the ATP Candidate to borrow.on .the.asset (s) ;* 1 

3 .' -Ifborrowing is not an option due,to :other .constraints .* . . . .such.as'the-ageof the-borrower,the 'Agency.andthe ATP 

Candidate may agree that the.asset 'willbe sold.aspart'

of the.reso1utio;l of the'ATP Candi.date'sest,ate,with , ' 

- .anappropriate portion of the proceeds from.thesale 

going to the ATP,settlement; or ' ' 

4.' , Not requiring either the sale of the .assetor borrowing 'I on the asset, but requiring the settl,eme,ntto include ,. 

: ~ Available Income (as defined.below)''for.a period . ', 

. . . .. . greater than,five (.5)years'. ', . .. 

.' EPA .should.also'ahalyze the.. value of a 'sum. certain'versus. '

.the. possibility,of'a greater amount if..paid over.time (.alongwith .: 

the;possibility of .a 'default-on the agreement .by the ATP . 

Candidate). The Agency should 'also estimate^. the net.sale .amount 

and.the enforcement-costs (such.as 'coststo require comp.liance .. wit'hthe ATP.settlement aQreement) for each alternative. I 

', , . 

The ability-to-borrowestimate should include the abili.ty'to .,. ' 

. borrow . ..on'otherassets owned ,bythe ATP Candidate, . Other assets 

include assets .of,significantvalue that are.owned by ..the .. 

.. individual ATP Candidate.that .havenot been demonstrated to be. . .. .. 

'. ordinary and:necessary 'for'theindividual or those dependent on 

'the'individual.. If other,constraints limit the borrowing." ' ' capacity . . on'assets. owned by the individual. ATP' . Candidate,'the .ATP.. 

. .. i

18 '. 

.. , I 

> ., 

. . . .. , . , . . . ... . .... . ... . i 

.. . ... .. . . . J 

.. .~ 

Case 3:14-cv-01772-MO Document 33-29 Filed 04/10/15 Page 21 of 37
.. , . . - 'I'., .. , 

. . . , 

estimate.should consider the amount.that,wouldbe available if 

the otheriassets were sold. 

�or individual ATP Candidates who are sole.proprietors or 

.. general partners, owners' equity should also be analyzed as a ' potential source of ATP settlement funds. This'analysis,should ' 

consider the ability of the ATP Candidate's enterprise'to attract 

additi'onal.investments or capital contribut'ions. Any funds 

identified in'this analysis should be included in the ATP amount. 

., .

INCOME AM) EbW STATEMENT PAASE .. .Theincome and ,cashflow statement phase looks at the'. ,' 

.revenues (income) and'expenses of the .individualATP Candidate; 'I 

The tax returns and other.financla1 information should.berelied 

upon to estimate the future income and sources of funds for the 

ATP Candidate,. The income and cash flow statement phase should 

.' identify~the.ordinary.and.'necessaryfiving expenses described in 

the ATP Candidate"s response to the financial questionnaire.' ' . ~ 

Ordinaxyand necessary living expenses include the cost of items. 

such'ashousing, utilities, food, transportation,.clothing, . . ,.. education, medical.treatment,and p'rescriptions..Ordinary and ' 

necessary -living.expe.nses,should.not'include expenses.for.assets , ; that would be described by any.reasonab1estandard as luhries. 

The decision concerning .ordinaryand necessary li.vingexpenses ? 

should be made based on the'uniquecondition of each individual 

ATP Candidate being pnalyzed. 

The case team should evaluate the ATP Candidate's sources of 

income and estimate the ATP Candidate's,futureincome. The case 

team should then examine the expenses identified by the 'ATP 

Candi.dateand estimate the ordinary and .necessaryliving expenses 

.' .forthe ATP Candidate'andthose dependent upon the ATP Candidate. 

In addition, if it.waa determined in the ba'lance sheet phase that 

the ATP Candidate has borrowing.capacity;additional expenses.to .- .. service such borrowing should be factored into this analysis. ,' .' 

The .difference.'betweenestimated future income and ordi,naryand 

.' necessary living expensee (includingany debt-servicing expenses) ': .. is .defined.asAvailable Income. .TheAgency should,normally, . 

. .. require the'ATP.Candidate:todirect five years of Available .. Income..towardpaymene.of the proposed settlement amount. 

'~ " As"diecusaeecf &re. fully in'the.&in body of this policy :' document,.the ,factpatterrassociated.with each ATP Candidate'.s 

financial position will detem'ine the number of years to include 

in the Available...Incomeestimate. This may result.inreducing or '

increas.ing.the number of years used in .computingthe Available . 

Income estimate. The.explanation,for.inychange in.theAvailable 

Incdme estimate should be part of the documentation .. requirement. .'

. . . . . . 

. . ' Normally, the income and"cashflow statement phase assumes 

that income:and expense projections will'remain.constant.. If . . ., 

19 

.. .. 

.. .. .. .. .. .. .. . . . . .. ~ ~~ 

Case 3:14-cv-01772-MO Document 33-29 Filed 04/10/15 Page 22 of 37
I . ' I . 

to refIect,thiscircumstance. .. ' 

,ESTABLISHMENTOF THE INITIAL ATP,AMOUNT 

. . 

,.. .. 

. . . . . . . . 

. . .. 

.. . . .. ,. . . . .. . 

\. .. 

. . 

,. .. , 

. . . . 

. . . ., 

.. . . . . ,. . ., . . , . . . 

I 

Case 3:14-cv-01772-MO Document 33-29 Filed 04/10/15 Page 23 of 37
-~ ~-~~ ~~ 

1 

' ' ." APPFIX B : BUSINESS ,. ABILITY TO PAY DETERMINATIONS , ' 

. . APPLICABILITY 

.. Businesses can be broadly grouped into three categories

corporations, partnerships, and sole'proprietorships. From'the , ' perspective of analyzing the financial health of a business, a 

' .criticaldistinction,,exis'tsamong these categories .regardingthe .. extent'towhich the business' ownersare responsible for the 

business' liabilities.,.A corporation is an entity in which 

ownership is established by parties (who may be individuals,

partnerships, or other corporations) who hold shares'of.stock in 

that corporation. The c.orporationunder'the law .hasthe status 

of a person: Therefore,'.liabklitygenerally is limited to-the ' . corporation. A corporation's owners (Le.,.shareholders)

generally enjoy-.limited,liability.for any of the corporation's'. ' . debts or legal claims, and the most they can,"losenis the value.. .. 

of .theirinvestments (i.e., stock) in the firm.: In assessing the ,. ., 

financial.health of a Corporation, only the'financial .. .resources :.

of.thecorporation .. are relevant. . ,

The owner of a sole proprietorship; in contrast, is not 

protected from business debts, and the owner.haa.unlimited i , . liability for his business.' The total financial,resources and 

financial responsibilities of'the owner of. a sole proprietorship 

or the partners of a general partnership should be evaluated in 

assessing the ability of these entities to'pay. 

A less common form of partnership is known as a "limited 

partnership." These partnerships consist.of one or more limited 

partners (whose liability.for the partnership's debts is limited 

to the amount of money originally invested) and one or more 

general partners (whose liability for partnership debts is not 

limited to the amoimt~'oftheir investment). .. 

~oir'purposeP-.ofanalyzing.ability to pay situations, it.may

be .necessary:to conault one or.both of the.appendices. For 

example, ATP settlements.affecting bus.incssesenjoying limited 

Iiability '(e.:g.,corporations). should be determined in.'accordance 

with the policy set.'forthin Appendix B and the main body of this. 

policy 'document.However, business-entitieswho have general

liability (e;g.',sole proprietorship)-are addressed in Appendix 

A:' Individual.Ability.to 'Pay.Detenriinationa. . . . . . . PURWSB OF BUSINESS-ABILITY To.?AY S w . . .. . . 

EPA does not intend the Superfund sett1ement.processto ' ' . , ' ' , 

result in.the closing of a .businessor the inability pf' a 

business .toconduct ita businese activities. For this reason an. . ' 

ATP .settlementwith a business PRF. is .permitted.if the.business '. 

PXP (the'"ATP Cdndidate.) demonstrates that..the'payment of a 

.. I .. . . .. .. . . . , 21 : .. 

.. .I 

.. .. .. . . .. .

Case 3:14-cv-01772-MO Document 33-29 Filed 04/10/15 Page 24 of 37
-- 

.. 

.~ 

certain sum of money is beyond its,financial.capability and't.hat 

settling'-.forsuch,a sum ,ofmoney would create an undue financial 

.hardship'Ifor the ATP candidate. 'The. business,ATP settlement 

should also meet the requiremehts contained in,the main'body of 

this policy document. . . . . 

EPA's analysis of.t.hefinancial condition of the ATP . . 

Candidate should'be Ijerfornied with the assistance of a person who 

..,isqualified to make this determination. If the analysmis

identifies available sources of funds t.hat.exceedthe proposed

settlement amount, there should be no 'reductionin. this amount. .. 

INITIAL,REVIEW '*. 

The ATP Candidate should provide.EPA with sufficient . . . financial.information,on.which to base an.ATP settlement 

decision.' Generally, the ATP.Candidate .shouldbe required ,to :.. 

'. provide a,minimum of the five most receng years of-.federal 

,-.corporateincome tax returns. Similarly, the Agency.should also. 

L' generally request the ,fivemost recent years of financial . information,,(audited,if available) 'anda completed financial . ' 

questiomaire~ 'Other'i,nformation,as. determined .byEPA, should. 

be provided andreviewed.by,EPA.'Thismay include loan 

applications, financial informati.onrelating to-otherentities. 

owned by the business and/or,shareholdersor directors of the 

bu'siness, financial.information.fora period of time greater than 

five years, and infonnation.'thatmight.assist in.est.imating the , fair market value of assets, ,liabilities,income and.expenses,of . _ the .ATPCandidate. ,. 

,, 

', .Theinitial review should character,izethe financial 

conditi,on'ofthe ATP Candidate . , in terms of,income.and net,worth,.,

The initial review may: 

Compare the ATP Candidatels income and expenses with ,similar 

businesses'; . . . . 

.. .. . . . . 

.. calculate various financ'ial.ratios (e.g., debt-to-equity: 

ratio) that help;.to,describe.theequity, solvency and 

profitability of the .ATP,Candidate; and. . . . .. 

'Comparenet income and cash flow projections with the . .

proposed settlement amount. . '. . . 

.. . .. 

If a preliminary review.of the financial information , . . 

indicates that.theproposed settlement amount.isnot significant. 

-

in comparison to.the.financial.positionof the ATP Candidate, the .. ... .. . . .. 

'For'example, info.r&ation.on'off,icers'coinpenbation'is' ' 

available.in the'RobertMorris.Associatesbusiness profiles. For 

further infonnation'onhow to make these comparisons, 'see'the 

'Beyond 'ABELTraining Course" materials. . . . . , . 

LZ , 1 

:

. . . . .. , . , . .. / 

Case 3:14-cv-01772-MO Document 33-29 Filed 04/10/15 Page 25 of 37
. . 

I 

analvsis h uld b suspended, and the ATP Candidate should 4 

/asked to kxplain why.the proposed settlement is likely to create -

an undue financial hardship. Only if such an explanation is 

provided should the analysis continue. 

Generally, if the financial characteristics indicate a . . . strong financial condition, a' reduction in the'proposed

settlement amount.is not justified. However, it is important to 

recognize that these are only financial indicators and do not.,

.express'afinal op,inionon any business. A: final opinion should 

only

financial analyst: ' . .. 

VERIFICATION . . . , 

.. . .,. 

be provide'd based on a detailed analysis by a qualified 

Businesses have available,an assortment of'Qcuments~ that ' : 

.describetheir 'financialcondition. However,.the majori,tyof . ' 

these financial'documents were prepared under standards that are 

different 'from,the.standardsused to evaluate.an ability to pay:.

Because of this, caution should be'used in relyivg on them. , . , Sufficient inquiries,should'.be'made to verify .the.accuracy of the. '' 

.documentsand to determine 'that they accurately reflect.the -. 

current financial condition.of ,theATP Candidate. , 

. , . *

Understanding trends in the 'businessand the reason.for the: 

trends are important in verifying the financial information. 

Superfund'litigationcan be expensive and.this may have created a * 

significant but temporary impact on the business .t'hatmay ease or 

discontinue after settlement. 

Other expense and spending.patternsshould ,alsobe examined 

to.determine whether debt has"increased or decreased-. Often in', : 

difficult financial .timesa.company may reduce assets to pay .. . .. expenses or borrow on the assets. 'Substantiating documentation', .. should be provided to explair why a business that has a'history 

.. of profit has increased its amount o'f debt or reduced its .net . worth: . .. .. . . 

.. 

43AiANq.sBEBT Pin+ .. 

. . .. ,. .. ' ' 

. The..balancesheet phase looks at,'the assets, .liabilities,

and'owners!- equity.ofthe 'business,ATP Candidate. Asset holdings'' 

.of a business should,generallyfall into either of two 

categories:- (1).assetathat are ordinary'and,necessary to . continue the . business operation(s) of the .business'ATP..'. : ' ' 'Candidate,;and (2) assets that are not ordinary and necessary for . 

the businese..operation(e)- of.,thebusiness,ATP Candidate. EP&..may ' 

. .. make inquiries as .tothe classification of .allassets. 

.. ' .. An. inquiry should be :made to determine if. the cbmpany has 

the ability to borrow upon either.or.bothtypes of asaets. If I 

.borrowingpotential exists,,the amount that could be borrowed and', , .. . .. . . , 

.. 23 . . 

.. .. . . .. ,. .. . . . . 

.. 

. . .. .. .. .. ., .. .. ... ~~~~~ 

Case 3:14-cv-01772-MO Document 33-29 Filed 04/10/15 Page 26 of 37
~, 

! 1 , . .. ,. ' . ~' 

paid by'the.ATP Candidate should be estimated.and .included in the 

ATP estirqate. '. I 

', If other constraints limit the borrowing capacity of the 

business ATP candidate',EPA should'estimate'the net proceeds from 

the sale of.ass,etsthat are notordinary and necessary. This 

estimate should be in,cludedin.'theATP amount. During the , , . 

balance sheet phase; �PA should ensure that.thebusiness ATP 

Candidate is not required to.disposeof ordinary and necessary

assets or to borrow so heavily'on ordinary.andnecessary assets 

that it is unable to make the~paymentson the debt. . .. . I 

" . Owners' equity should also be analyzed as a potential Source 

of ATP settlement funds. As described more fully in the main ' i. 

body.of'this policy document,,this analysis.shouldIook at two 

primary c,omponents:dividends.and capital contributdons.,' hy , 

. . funds-identified .. in this'analysisshould be'included in the ATP .. . . -amount:. : :. .. .. .. 

INCOME AND .&SIX FMW STA- PIIASE :' 

The incpme and cash flow statement%.phase'l,&ks.at the. 

revenues'(income) and expenses.of .thebusiness.,ATP'Candidate. : 

.. . . .This phase of the.analysisshould predict future earning. .. 

potential and identify ordinary and necessary e:jenses for the J 

business ATP'Candidate. This should be based on financial , 

statements from prior-yearsand.likelyfuture events. The goal, : 

of the .ATPsettlement should be to allow the business'to remain ' 

solvent, but.not to.retain excess cash flow. 'Anyexcess cash 

,flowshould instead be used as a'sourceof contribution t0wards.a 

Superfund site cleanup. Similarly, the ATP'settlement should not 

'permit inflated or unreasonable .expenses. . . .. 

.. When conducting .theincome ani cash flow statement phase, . .

EPA should 1ook.tosee that all sources of income are identified 

and valued accurately,.and that 'anyrelated party transactions..., , . 

.(i.me.;.transactionsamong'natural persons'related to each.other,

or.,amo,ng-corporationsthat aye closely.related) are identified;

Current and projected future sources of income should be-compared

with-priorsources of income and.anestimate 03 future income .. should ,bemade. . . . , .. . ,. . . .. . . . . 

. . , Current and estimated future expenses should also ,be.' i' ' examined, Expenses of'.thebusiness ATP Candidate that are.: 

intrinsic to'-the.service or manufacturing purpose of. the , 

corporation ("ordinary,andnecessary expensesm.)should be 

reviewed. Expenses that.'donot appear to relate to the business ,' , 

purpose of the businese.ATP Candidate (e.g., charitable 

contr2butions; dues and membership fees) should be questioned..

.In,addition;if during the balance sheet phage it wae determined 1' 

that.the ATP Candidate .hadadditional borrowing capacity, future' 

expenses..4houldreflect,increased debt ,servixing:requirements. .. . . 

;. *. 24 

.. .. : . .. ,. . . , 

Case 3:14-cv-01772-MO Document 33-29 Filed 04/10/15 Page 27 of 37
.. . 

_. 

. 

.II 

. . 

Case 3:14-cv-01772-MO Document 33-29 Filed 04/10/15 Page 28 of 37
. 

, . .,,' , . 

.. . . I,., ... ., r 

* APPENDIX c: ' DEFINITIONS. . .. . . .. ',.. 

. . 

' .. . Availdle Income is 'thedifference between.projected revenues and 

I. ordinary and nedessary expenses.,generally for the next five I' : years. . . .. ,. 

,. :,.,. . . Increased Future Needs are-ordinary and ~necessafiexpenses'that ...will be incurred'.by.the ATP Candidate that have not been,incurred j, , .:: ' / 

. 'inthe.,past that were 'incur.red.previouslybut which a're ',, , . 

expected to be significantly'greaterthan~inthe past. . . 

i

I:

<:. Ordinary and Necessary Asset:is.an asset that is currently,used : 

for .'abusiness purpose or an asset,that proviaes .for:a need of . , 

an indiv.idua1.ATP.Candid,ateor.those.dependent,on-him/her. : . . , . 

I, '.I ATP Amouht' is the sum of Available Income, excess,cash,,amounts 

available'from est'imatedborrowing capacity, amounts available 

' . from the sale of issets.that'arenot ordinary and.necessary,and i . :' . ,amountsavailable f.rom,owners' equity, reduced by a safety 

1' ', 

factor.' , , 

I . I 

, ~. 

! ~. - Undue Financial Hardship occurs if payment .of the set,tiement; .. ' '. . .. . . . amount sought by'the,governmentwill deprive an ATP CandidaSe.of: 

ordinary and necessary assets or cause an ATP Candidate to be '.a 

unable to pay.forordinary and.necessarybusiness expenses and/or i 

1 

,, .. ordinary and necessary living expenses. .. 

I' 

1 . ., I. ~ . , I , 

I .. .. .. .. . . .. . . , .. ! .. 

. . . . 

. . . .. . . 

.. . I ,. .. . . . . . . . . . . , 

I .. . . . .. .. . . .. 

'. . . .. .. ' 

.. 

. '.26 . .. .. , 

. 

I 

.. .. , 

Case 3:14-cv-01772-MO Document 33-29 Filed 04/10/15 Page 29 of 37
Case 3:14-cv-01772-MO Document 33-29 Filed 04/10/15 Page 30 of 37
Case 3:14-cv-01772-MO Document 33-29 Filed 04/10/15 Page 31 of 37
Case 3:14-cv-01772-MO Document 33-29 Filed 04/10/15 Page 32 of 37
Case 3:14-cv-01772-MO Document 33-29 Filed 04/10/15 Page 33 of 37


Case 3:14-cv-01772-MO Document 33-29 Filed 04/10/15 Page 36 of 37
Case 3:14-cv-01772-MO Document 33-29 Filed 04/10/15 Page 37 of 37