alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

MEDFORD DIVISION 

LANCE A. BRITTON, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

KLAlVIATH COUNTY, et al, 

Defendants, 

AIKEN, District Judge. 

No. 1:15-cr-02086-CL 

ORDER 

Magistrate Judge J\IIark Clarke has filed his Findings and Recommendation 

("F&R'') (doc. 144) recommending that defendants' motion for summary judgment 

(doc. 93) and motion to strike (doc. 101) should be GRANTED, and plaintiffs motion 

for default judgment (doc. 98), motion for reconsideration (doc. 108), and five other 

miscellaneous motions (docs. 104, 105, 111, 129, 138) should be DENIED. The case 

is now before this Court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). 

Plaintiff has filed timely objections (doc. 150) to the F&R, and defendants have 

filed a timely response. (doc. 151). When either party objects to any portion of a 

magistrate judge's F&R, the district court must make a de nova determination of that 

portion of the magistrate judge's report. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l); McDonnell 

Page 1 - ORDER 
Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 

1981), cert denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982). 

Having reviewed the entire file of this case, the Court finds no error in the 

F&R. Thus, the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Clarke's F&R (doc. 144) in its 

entirety. Defendants' motion for summary judgment and motion to strike are 

GRANTED. Plaintiffs motions (docs. 98, 104, 105, 108, 111, 120, 129, and 138) are 

DENIED for the reasons set forth in the F&R. Plaintiffs motion to open discovery 

(doc. 153) is denied as moot. Accordingly, this case is dismissed, with prejudice. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated this 3rd day of September 2019. 

Ann Aiken 

United States District Judge 

Page 2 - ORDER
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Range Management Research: Las Cruces, NM
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Comprehensive Publications
                    Research SummarySearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Las Cruces, New Mexico Range Management Research Docs





- Landscape Toolbox
- Long Term Agricultural Research
- EcoTrends
- Long Term Ecological Research
- Ecological Site Descriptions
- Monitoring & Assessment
- Southwest Climate Hub
- Land Potential Knowledge System
- National Ecological Observatory Network
- JournalMap
- Assessment, Inventory, and Monitoring (AIM)
- Data Catalogs

NM ESD Core Group Meetingsheadline bar May 3, 2001 Meeting MinutesApril 4, 2005 Meeting MinutesMay 31, 2006 Meeting MinutesNovember 15, 2007 Meeting MinutesAugust 15, 2008 Activity ReportAugust 15, 2008 Meeting MinutesDecember 1, 2009 Meeting MinutesDecember 16, 2010 Meeting MinutesDecember 15, 2011 Meeting MinutesDecember 5, 2012 Meeting MinutesAdditional files related to the meeting (business plan, NM LRU legend, accomplishments, etc.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
RYDER SCOTT COMPANY                                           Fax (713) 651-0849
PETROLEUM ENGINEERS
1100 Louisiana  Suite 3800   Houston, Texas 77002-5218  Telephone (713) 651-9191







                      CONSENT OF PETROLEUM ENGINEERING FIRM
                        AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO ANNUAL REPORT


     We consent to the  reference to our name  included in this Annual Report on
Form  10-K405/A for the year ended  December 31, 1997 for Geodyne  Energy Income
Limited Partnership II-F.


                                          //s// Ryder Scott Company
                                                 Petroleum Engineers

                                          RYDER SCOTT COMPANY
                                          PETROLEUM ENGINEERS




Houston, Texas
July 27, 1998
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Edward T. Schafer Agricultural Research Center: Fargo, ND
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    ETSARC Research Units
                        ETSARC Home page
                                    Office of the Center Director
                                    Location Support Staff
                                    Animal Metabolism-Agricultural Chemicals Research
                                    Cereal Crops Research
                                    Insect Genetics and Biochemistry Research
                                    Sugarbeet and Potato Research
                                    Sunflower and Plant Biology Research
                                    Pulse Crop Health Initiative
                                    National Sclerotinia InitiativeSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us






DOCSheadline bar National Sclerotinia Initiative
               Pulse Crop Health Initiative
               National Sclerotinia Initiative Folder


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit 20

Case 3:14-cv-01772-MO Document 33-34 Filed 04/10/15 Page 1 of 4
Case 3:14-cv-01772-MO Document 33-34 Filed 04/10/15 Page 2 of 4 Case 09-10235-BLS Doc 8880 Filed 01/06/11 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:14-cv-01772-MO Document 33-34 Filed 04/10/15 Page 3 of 4 Case 09-10235-BLS Doc 8880 Filed 01/06/11 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:14-cv-01772-MO Document 33-34 Filed 04/10/15 Page 4 of 4 Case 09-10235-BLS Doc 8880 Filed 01/06/11 Page 3 of 3
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

RESOURCES GROUP, LLC, AS TRUSTEE OF THE BOURNE VALLEY COURT TRUST, Appellant, vs. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR STRUCTURED ASSET INVESTMENT LOAN TRUST, MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-10, Respondent. No. 64676 

# FILED
MAY 2 3 2016

TRACIE K. LINDEMAN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT By 

### 5 -`1 DEPUTY

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 

### VACATING AND REMANDING This is an appeal from a district court order denying a preliminary injunction in a quiet title action. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Kenneth C. Cory, Judge.

Thefl district court denied appellant's preliminary injunction motion, finding that appellant lacked a reasonable likelihood of success on the merits of its quiet title claim because Copperhead Hills Landscape Maintenance Association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale did not extinguish respondent's deed of trust. In 

### SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 130 Nev., Adv. Op. 75, 334 P.3d 408 (2014), this court decided that a common-interest community association's superpriority lien has true priority over a first security interest, and the association may nonjudicially foreclose on that lien. Thus, the district court's decision appears to have been based in part on an erroneous interpretation of the controlling law. To the extent that the district court based its decision on the conclusion that Copperhead Hills' lien did not include amounts for which superpriority status can be granted, the record contains conflicting evidence in that respect, even in light of this court's recent decision in

(0) 1 ) 347A orgilyio

- 

### oct3Horizons at Seven Hills Homeowners Ass'n v. Ikon Holdings, LLC, 132

Nev., Adv. Op. 35, P.3d (2016). Cf. SFR Invs., 130 Nev., Adv. Op. 75, 334 P.3d at 418 (observing that monthly assessments "will typically comprise most, perhaps even all, of the HOA lien"). Accordingly, we

VACATE the order denying preliminary injunctive relief AND REMAND this matter to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this order.'

J.

Saitta J.

Pickering
cc: Hon. Kenneth C. Cory, District Judge Law Offices of Michael F. Bohn, Ltd. Snell & Wilmer, LLP/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

'The injunction imposed by our March 31, 2014, order is vacated.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A 

### e
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

                           Chase Funding Mortgage Loan
                            Asset-Backed Certificates
                           Series 2004-1 (the "Trust")

I, Thomas L. Wind, Co-Chief Executive Officer of Chase Funding, Inc., the
depositor of assets into the above-referenced Trust, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form
      8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of
      periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of the Trust;

2.    Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
      does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
      a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
      circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of
      the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required
      to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and
      servicing agreement for inclusion in these reports is included in these
      reports;

4.    Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement included in
      this annual report and required to be delivered to the trustee in
      accordance with the terms of the pooling and servicing agreement, and
      except as disclosed in this annual report, the servicer has fulfilled its
      obligations under the pooling and servicing agreement; and

5.    The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
      servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the
      report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a
      review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for
      Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and
      servicing agreement, that is included in these reports.


Date:    March 30, 2005


          /s/ Thomas L. Wind
          -----------------------------
Name:     Thomas L. Wind
Title:    Co-Chief Executive Officer
Company:  Chase Mortgage Finance Corporation
#### HALL v. ENTERPRISE MANUF’G CO. In re TIETZ, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March, 1896.)

Action by De Leon F. Hall against the Enterprise Manufacturing Company. Petition by Theodore Tietz for the removal of Austin Brainard as ancillary receiver, etc.

No opinion. Order affirmed,. with $10 costs and disbursements.
#### HADDEN v. HALL.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.

December 2, 1895.)

Action by Charles E. Hadden against Edward B. Hall.

Burr & Coombs (Robert H. Wilson, of counsel), for appellant.

Joseph M. Williams, for respondent.

PRATT, J.

The verdict substantially gave plaintiff all that he claimed, and made slight, if any, allowance for the deficiencies in execution of the building contract which were many and practically undisputed. It is therefore impossible to sustain the verdict of the jury to its full extent. Giving all proper effect to the plaintiff’s testimony and to the verdict, we are of opinion that the sum of $1,694 should be deducted from the verdict, or, in the alternative, a new trial be granted. The plaintiff may elect between such modification and a new trial. In case he elects to accept the modification, the allowance of 5 per cent, upon $1,694 will also be deducted from the judgment, which, as thus modified, is affirmed, without costs of appeal; otherwise judgment reversed, and new trial granted, costs to abide event.
# C_2006148EN.01001101.xml

| 24.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/11

---

Publication of decisions by Member States to grant or revoke operating licenses pursuant to Article 13(4) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92 on licensing of air carriers (1)
   (2)

1

2

(2006/C 148/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

DENMARK

Operating licences granted

Category B:   Operating licences including the restriction of Article 5(7)(a) of Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92

| Name of air carrier | Address of air carrier | Permitted to carry | Decision effective since |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Air Alpha A/S | Postbox 630 |
| Odense Lufthavn |
| 5270 Odense N |
| Denmark |

Name of air carrier

Address of air carrier

Permitted to carry

Decision effective since

Air Alpha A/S

Postbox 630

Odense Lufthavn

5270 Odense N

Denmark

passengers, mail, cargo

11.5.2006

GERMANY

Operating licences granted

Category A:   Operating licences without the restriction of Article 5(7)(a) of Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92

| Name of air carrier | Address of air carrier | Permitted to carry | Decision effective since |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Jetline Fluggesellschaft mbH & Co. KG | Mercedesstraße 9 |
| D-70794 Filderstadt |

Name of air carrier

Address of air carrier

Permitted to carry

Decision effective since

Jetline Fluggesellschaft mbH & Co. KG

Mercedesstraße 9

D-70794 Filderstadt

passengers, mail, cargo

20.4.2006

---

(1)  OJ L 240, 24.8.1992, p. 1.

1

(2)  Communicated to the European Commission before 31.8.2005.

2

---
PAGE 1 – ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

JESSE MARTINEZ, personal 

representative for the Estate of Rita Blanco, 

deceased,

Plaintiff,

v.

WILLAMETTE VALLEY MEDICAL 

CENTER, LLC, a foreign limited liability 

company; AUDREY TERESA TRAINER; 

EMERGENCY MEDICAL ASSOCIATES 

OF MCMINNVILLE, LLP, a domestic 

limited liability partnership; and the 

UNITED STATES of AMERICA,

Defendants.

Case No. 3:15-cv-01794-SI

ORDER

Michael H. Simon, District Judge.

On October 8, 2015, Defendant United States of America (the “United States”) moved to 

dismiss Plaintiff Jesse Martinez’s (“Martinez”) claims against it under Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure (“FRCP”) 12(b)(1) for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, and, in the alternative, 

under FRCP 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. Dkt. 9. In Martinez’s response, he conceded that 

the Court does not have subject-matter jurisdiction over his claims against the United States and 

argued that the claims should be dismissed without prejudice. Dkt. 13 at 2-3. In the United 

Case 3:15-cv-01794-SI Document 18 Filed 11/24/15 Page 1 of 2
PAGE 2 – ORDER

States’ reply, it argued that Martinez’s claims should be dismissed with prejudice based upon its

statute of limitations affirmative defense brought under FRCP 12(b)(6). Dkt. 16. Because the 

Court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction over Martinez’s claims against the United States, the 

Court does not address the merits of the FRCP 12(b)(6) motion. See Willy v. Coastal Corp., 503 

U.S. 131, 137 (1992) (noting that “[a] final determination of lack of subject-matter jurisdiction of 

a case in a federal court, of course, precludes further adjudication of it”). The United States’

motion to dismiss (Dkt. 9) is GRANTED. Martinez’s claims against the United States are 

dismissed without prejudice. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 24th day of November, 2015.

/s/ Michael H. Simon

Michael H. Simon

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-01794-SI Document 18 Filed 11/24/15 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 163 (Thursday, August 26, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 47742]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-18310]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

United States Mint


Establish Pricing for United States Mint Numismatic Product

AGENCY: United States Mint, Department of the Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The United States Mint is announcing new pricing for a United 
States Mint numismatic product in accordance with the table below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            2021 retail
                         Product                               price
------------------------------------------------------------------------
George Herbert Walker Bush--Coin and Chronicles Set              $120.00
 (20PA).................................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Josephine Campbell, Marketing 
Specialist, Sales and Marketing; United States Mint; 801 9th Street NW, 
Washington, DC 20220; or call 202-354-7750.
    Authority: Public Law 116-112.

Eric Anderson,
Executive Secretary, United States Mint.
[FR Doc. 2021-18310 Filed 8-25-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
Case 6:15-cv-02266-MC Document 28 Filed 12/13/17 Page 1of1 

Kathryn Tassinari 

Mark Manning 

kathrynt50@comcast.net 

HARDER, WELLS, BARON & MANNING, P.C. 

474 Willamette, Suite 200 

Eugene, OR 97401 

(541) 686-1969 

Of Attorneys for Plaintiff 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

JAMIE M. HOLLY, ) 

) 

) 

Plaintiff, ) 

vs. ) 

) 

NANCY A. BERRYHILL, ) 

Acting Commissioner of Social Security, ) 

) 

Defendant. ) 

Case No. 6:15-cv-02266-MC 

ORDER APPROVING PLAINTIFF'S 

MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES 

PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. §406(b) 

After considering Plaintiffs Motion for Attorney Fees, and counsel for Defendant having 

no objection, Order is hereby granted in the sum of $19,048.73 for attorney fees pursuant to 42 

U.S.C. §406(b), payable to HARDER, WELLS, BARON & MANNING, P.C., 474 Willamette, 

Suite 200, Eugene, OR 97401. The Commissioner shall deduct from this amount an 

administrative assessment under 42 U.S.C. §406(d) and pay Plaintiff's counsel the balance. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this~ day of D'-<- , 2017. 

/ 

United States District Judge/Magistrate 

PRESENTED BY: 

Kathryn Tassinari 

Of Attorneys for Plaintiff 

ORDER APPROVING MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES UNDER TO 42 U.S.C.§406(b) - 1
Exhibit 32.1
------------

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Annual Report of Landauer, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, William E. Saxelby, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
of my knowledge and belief:

i.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

ii.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Landauer, Inc. and will be retained by Landauer, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



                              /s/ William E. Saxelby
                              William E. Saxelby
                              President & Chief Executive Officer


December 12, 2007
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-2469

_____________________________

KIARA ROCHELLE SANDERS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Thomas V. Dannheisser, Judge.

April 6, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and BILBREY and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Kiara Rochelle Sanders, pro se, Appellant.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.