alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY 
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           8,926
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  109,349
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,463
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               124,678
<PP&E>                                          13,649
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 308,498
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,868
<BONDS>                                         39,144
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           326
<OTHER-SE>                                     225,080
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   308,498
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               400,829
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  302,824
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                73,587
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,319
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,357
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,981
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,376
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,376
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.42
        

</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals
**San Antonio, Texas** 

April 16, 2020

No. 04

- 20

- 00125

- CV

PAY AND SAVE, INC.

, Appellant

v.

Roel CANALES

, Appellee

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Duval County, Texas Trial Court No. DC

- 16

- 371 Honorable Baldemar Garza, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Extension of time to file reporter's record is hereby NOTED. Time is extended until M ay 15, 2020

.

_________________________________ Liz a A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 16th day of April, 2020

.

___________________________________ Michael A . Cruz

, Clerk of Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 11504]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for temporary display in the exhibition “Holbein: Capturing Character” at the J. Paul Getty Museum at the Getty Center, Los Angeles, California, The Morgan Library & Museum, New York, New York, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Chi D. Tran, Program Administrator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street, NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000.                

Matthew R. Lussenhop,

Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2021-18157 Filed 8-23-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
Case 6:15-cv-01941-MC Document 18-1 Filed 09/27/16 Page 1 of 2 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

MICHAEL R. SCHAFER, Civil No. 6:15-CV-01941-MC 

Plaintiff, 

v. ORDER FOR REMAND 

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, 

Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 

Defendant. 

Based on the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that the above-captioned 

case be REVERSED and REMANDED for further administrative proceedings pursuant to 

sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On remand, the ALJ should reevaluate the medical 

evidence, including the opinions of Martin Kehrli, M.D. and Robert Henry Ph.D. The ALJ 

should reevaluate the severity of Plaintiffs symptoms consistent with Social Security Ruling 16-

3p. The ALJ should obtain additional vocational expert evidence regarding Plaintiffs past 

relevant work and determine whether the work Plaintiff performed as a census taker was an 

unsuccessful work attempt. The ALJ should assess Plaintiffs transferrable skills, if any, and 

assess Plaintiffs ability to perform past work or other work. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 2-" day of __ s_~_p,._J.-- ___ , 2016. 

\r----• lL---· 

UNITED STA TES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Page 1 ORDER- [6:15-CV-01941-MC] 

Case 6:15-cv-01941-MC Document 19 Filed 09/28/16 Page 1 of 2
Case 6:15-cv-01941-MC Document 18-1 Filed 09/27/16 Page 2 of 2 

Submitted by: 

BILLY J. WILLIAMS, OSB #901366 

United States Attorney 

JANICE E. HEBERT, La. Bar #20218 

Assistant United States Attorney 

s/ Catherine Escobar 

CA THERINE ESCOBAR 

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney 

of Attorneys for Defendant 

(206) 615-3701 

Page 1 ORDER- [6:15-CV-01941-MC] 

Case 6:15-cv-01941-MC Document 19 Filed 09/28/16 Page 2 of 2
#### YOUNG, Respondent, v. NESTELL, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Third Department.

December 28, 1895.)

Action by Myron Young against George B. Nestell.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with costs.
Page 1 – OPINION AND ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

EUGENE DIVISION

KEVIN MICHAEL ELLIOTT,

 Case No. 2:15-cv-02131-CL

Petitioner, 

 OPINION AND ORDER

v. 

JERI TAYLOR,

Respondent.

___________________________________

MCSHANE, Judge:

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Findings and Recommendation (“F&R”), ECF 

No. 77, and the matter is now before this Court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); Rule 8(b), Rules 

Governing Section 2254 Cases; Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Petitioner timely filed objections to the 

F&R. ECF No. 79. Accordingly, I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(1)(C); Rule 8(b), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases; McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. 

Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). I find no error and conclude 

that the F&R is correct. Judge Clarke’s F&R is adopted in full. Consistent with Judge Clarke’s

F&R, Petitioner’s Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, ECF No. 21, is 

DENIED. I further decline to issue Petitioner a Certificate of Appealability pursuant to 28 
Page 2 – OPINION AND ORDER

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) on the basis that petitioner has not made a “substantial showing of the denial 

of a constitutional right,” as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 26th day of April, 2019.

/s/ Michael McShane________

Michael J. McShane

United States District Judge
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Chief Judge Moon, Judge Willis and Senior Judge Hodges 

Argued at Alexandria, Virginia 

MICHAEL DWAYNE CARTER 

v. Record No. 1756-94-4 MEMORANDUM OPINION* BY 

 JUDGE JERE M. H. WILLIS, JR. 

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA OCTOBER 3, 1995 

 FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY 

Frank A. Hoss, Jr., Judge 

 Polly B. Knight for appellant. 

 Eugene Murphy, Assistant Attorney General 

(James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General, on 

brief), for appellee. 

 On appeal from his conviction of conspiracy to distribute 

cocaine, Michael Dwayne Carter contends that the evidence is 

insufficient to support his conviction. We agree and reverse the 

judgment of the trial court. 

 On July 2, 1993, while conducting covert surveillance in the 

area of Bird Drive in Manassas, Officer Woolverton saw Mary 

Barber, whose identity he knew, talking to a man later identified 

as Gerald Davis. Davis asked Ms. Barber whether she could find 

him some drugs. He gave her $140. Ms. Barber approached Carter 

who was standing nearby. He gave her crack cocaine, which she 

gave to Davis, who then walked away. Ms. Barber then gave the 

$140 to Carter. 

 This evidence fails to prove that Carter conspired with Ms. 

 

 *Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not 

designated for publication. 
- 2 - 

Barber to distribute cocaine to Davis. "A conspiracy is 'an 

agreement between two or more persons by some concerted action to 

commit an offense.'" Brown v. Commonwealth, 3 Va. App. 101, 107, 

348 S.E.2d 408, 411 (1986). "Absent an actual agreement between 

two or more persons, a bilateral meeting of the minds, Virginia 

law precludes a finding that a conspiracy exists." Fortune v. 

Commonwealth, 12 Va. App. 643, 650, 406 S.E.2d 47, 50 (1991). 

"[T]he Commonwealth must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that an 

agreement existed." Floyd v. Commonwealth, 219 Va. 575, 580, 249 

S.E.2d 171, 174 (1978). 

 "A conspiracy to distribute drugs can be shown by a series 

of drug transactions where one person sells drugs to a buyer who, 

in turn, resells them to a third party." Feigley v. 

Commonwealth, 16 Va. App. 717, 722, 432 S.E.2d 520, 524 (1993). 

"As a general rule a single buyer-seller relationship, standing 

alone, does not constitute a conspiracy." Zuniga v. 

Commonwealth, 7 Va. App. 523, 528, 375 S.E.2d 381, 385 (1988). 

"Likewise, evidence of a distribution offense absent an agreement 

will not suffice to support a conspiracy conviction." Id. 

 Viewed in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, the 

evidence failed to prove that Carter and Ms. Barber had 

prearranged the distribution of drugs. No evidence proved a 

prior meeting, a meeting of the minds, or prior transactions 

completed in the same manner by Ms. Barber for Carter. The 

evidence disclosed only an isolated transaction wherein Ms. 
- 3 - 

Barber agreed to act on behalf of Davis to purchase drugs. The 

Commonwealth failed to prove a conspiracy between Carter and Ms. 

 Barber. 

 The judgment of the trial court is reversed. 

 Reversed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-7372

TRAVIS L. WATSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

DENNIS DANIELS,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at 

Greensboro. Loretta C. Biggs, District Judge. (1:19-cv-00249-LCB-LPA)

Submitted: March 16, 2023 Decided: March 21, 2023

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Travis L. Watson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7372 Doc: 12 Filed: 03/21/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Travis L. Watson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his various 

motions for relief from the district court’s prior order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2254 petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). See generally United States v. 

McRae, 793 F.3d 392, 400 & n.7 (4th Cir. 2015). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this 

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court’s assessment 

of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 580 U.S. 100, 115-17 

(2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition 

states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 

134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Watson has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7372 Doc: 12 Filed: 03/21/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
Technical Work Group

December 7, 2000

Phoenix, Arizona

Presiding: Rick Johnson, Chairperson

Committee Members Present:

Clifford Barrett, CREDA Norm Henderson, NPS/GCRA

Robert Begay, Navajo Nation Nancy Hornewer, USGS

Perri Benemelis, ADWR Pamela Hyde, Southwest Rivers

Andres Cheama, Pueblo of Zuni Matt Kaplinski, GCRG

Kerry Christensen, Hualapai Tribe Phillip Lehr, Colo. River Commission/Nevada

Dave Cohen, Trout Unlimited Don Metz, USFWS

Wayne Cook, UCRC S. Clayton Palmer, WAPA

William Davis, CREDA Bill Persons, AGFD

Kurt Dongoske, The Hopi Tribe Randall Peterson, USBR

Brenda Drye, So. Paiute Consortium D. Randolph Seaholm, CWCB

Christopher Harris, CRBC Robert Winfree, NPS/GCRA

Committee Members Absent:

Amy Heuslein, BIA Nikolai Ramsey, GCT

Robert King, UDWR John Shields, WY State Engineer’s Office

Alternates Present: For:

Wayne Cook John Shields, WY State Engineer’s Office

Other Interested Persons Present:

Gary Burton, WAPA Mike Liszewski, GCMRC

Nancy Coulam, USBR Ted Melis, GCMRC

Barbara Gerhart, Aide for R. Lynch Mary Orton, Mary Orton Company

Barry Gold, GCMRC Andre Potochnik, GCRG

Dennis Kubly, USBR Barbara Ralston, GCMRC

Jen Kunde, NPS/GCNP Ted Rampton, UAMPS/CREDA

Ruth Lambert, GCMRC Jeff Sorensen, AGFD
Technical Work Group

December 8, 2000

Phoenix, Arizona

Presiding: Rick Johnson, Chairperson

Committee Members Present:

Clifford Barrett, CREDA Nancy Hornewer, USGS

Perri Benemelis, ADWR Pamela Hyde, Southwest Rivers

Andres Cheama, Pueblo of Zuni Matt Kaplinski, GCRG

Kerry Christensen, Hualapai Tribe Phillip Lehr, Colo. River Commission/Nevada

Dave Cohen, Trout Unlimited Don Metz, USFWS

Wayne Cook, UCRC S. Clayton Palmer, WAPA

William Davis, CREDA Bill Persons, AGFD

Kurt Dongoske, The Hopi Tribe Randall Peterson, USBR

Brenda Drye, So. Paiute Consortium D. Randolph Seaholm, CWCB

Christopher Harris, CRBC Robert Winfree, NPS/GCRA

Norm Henderson, NPS/GCRA

Committee Members Absent:

Robert Begay, Navajo Nation Clayton Palmer, WAPA

Amy Heuslein, BIA Nikolai Ramsey, GCT

Robert King, UDWR John Shields, WY State Engineer’s Office

Alternates Present: For:

Gary Burton Clayton Palmer, WAPA

Wayne Cook John Shields, WY State Engineer’s Office

Other Interested Persons Present:

Nancy Coulam, USBR Ted Melis, GCMRC

Barry Gold, GCMRC Mary Orton, Mary Orton Company

Dennis Kubly, USBR Andre Potochnik, GCRG

Jen Kunde, NPS/GCNP Barbara Ralston, GCMRC

Ruth Lambert, GCMRC Ted Rampton, UAMPS/CREDA

Mike Liszewski, GCMRC
EXHIBIT 32.2
------------



                CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                   OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Landauer, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, James M. O'Connell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify that:

     i.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of
           Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
           1934; and

     ii.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
           material respects, the financial condition and results of
           operations of the Company.




                                  /s/ James M. O'Connell
                                  -----------------------------------
                                  Chief Financial Officer





December 19, 2003


[Signed originals of these written statements required by Section 906 have
been provided to Landauer, Inc. and will be retained by Landauer, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.]
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 164 (Friday, August 27, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 48232]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-18452]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Initial Review Group; Digestive Diseases and 
Nutrition C Study Section, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition DDK-C 
Subcommittee.
    Date: October 21-22, 2021.
    Time: 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 
Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Video Meeting).
    Contact Person: Maria E. Davila-Bloom, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, NIDDK, 
National Institutes of Health, Room 7017, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 594-7637, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cfabaeb9a6a3aee2ada3a0a0a2a28faab7bbbdaee1a1a6ababa4e1a1a6a7e1a8a0b9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d6b2b7a0bfbab7fbb4bab9b9bbbb96b3aea2a4b7f8b8bfb2b2bdf8b8bfbef8b1b9a0">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 23, 2021.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-18452 Filed 8-26-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1 – ORDER 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

CHRISTOPHER JAMES ALLEN, No. 6:15-cv-01215-YY

Plaintiff, ORDER 

v.

NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting 

Commissioner of Social Security, 

Defendant. 

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: 

Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You issued a Findings and Recommendation (“F&R”) [34] 

on October 23, 2017, in which she recommends that the Court grant Plaintiff’s Motion for 
2 – ORDER 

Attorney Fees Under 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) [30], the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), for 

$4,836.44. 

Because neither party timely filed an objection to the Magistrate Judge’s F&R, the Court 

is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 

1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 

(9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which 

objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no 

error. 

CONCLUSION 

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge You’s F&R [34]. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s 

Motion for EAJA Fees [30] is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this day of , 2018.

____________________________________

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ 

United States District Judge