alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 12.01


                           CARAUSTAR INDUSTRIES, INC.

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            1998         1999        2000         2001             2002
                                                         ----------   ----------   ----------   ----------      ----------
<S>                                                      <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>             <C>
EARNINGS:
Income from continuing operations before income
  taxes, minority interest, reversal of loss
  on discontinued operations and cumulative effect
  of accounting changes                                  $   83,053   $   64,445   $   13,829   $  (22,295)     $  (27,778)
Equity in income of less-than-50-percent-owned Entities          12            0            0            0               0
Fixed charges                                                19,469       30,528       41,776       49,997          47,245
Less capitalized interest expense                              (219)        (626)        (852)           0               0
                                                         ----------   ----------   ----------   ----------      ----------
Earnings                                                 $  102,315   $   94,347   $   54,753   $   27,702      $   19,467
                                                         ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========      ==========
FIXED CHARGES:
Interest expense                                         $   16,072   $   25,735   $   35,730   $   43,492      $   39,938
Amortization of debt issuance costs                              --          142          737        1,566           1,534
Estimate of the interest cost within rental expense           3,178        4,025        4,457        4,939           5,773
Capitalized interest expense                                    219          626          852            0               0
                                                         ----------   ----------   ----------   ----------      ----------
Fixed charges                                            $   19,469   $   30,528   $   41,776   $   49,997      $   47,245
                                                         ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========      ==========
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                             5.26         3.09         1.31         0.55(1)         0.41(1)
                                                         ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========      ==========
</TABLE>

(1)      The 2002 and 2001 earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges. The
         cover deficiency was $27.8 million and $22.3 million for 2002 and 2001,
         respectively.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<CIK>                              0000826345
<NAME>                             GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LTD PARTNERSHIP II-B
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                       DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                644,574
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                         565,152
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    1,209,726
<PP&E>                             21,746,216
<DEPRECIATION>                     18,711,058
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      4,414,695
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 166,425
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                          4,159,751
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        4,414,695
<SALES>                             3,816,269
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    4,039,160
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       2,843,964
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     1,195,196
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 1,195,196
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                        1,195,196
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            3.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0
        

</TABLE>
GCD Technical Work Group 

May 3-4, 2004, Meeting 

Action Items

No. Item Status 

1 

(from Nov 2003) Lew Coggins will schedule a HBC discussion for 

an upcoming TWG meeting. 

Done. GCMRC will prepare the necessary 

contracts in accordance with Federal 

procurement guidelines. 

2 

(Continuing) Bill Persons and GCMRC will provide an update on 

the metrics and management objectives for the Lee’s Ferry trout 

fishery at the June/July 2004 meeting and lead the TWG to 

looking at the bigger issue (updating management objectives). 

3 

The TWG will send additional comments on the TWG Operating 

Procedures to the TWG Chairman with a cc to Linda by April 14, 

2004. Further discussion will be held at a future TWG Meeting. Done. 

4 

(Continuing) Mary Barger will provide updates on the HBC 

Genetics Management Plan at upcoming TWG meetings 

5 

(Continuing) Glen Knowles track the status of the Willow Beach 

Genetics Assessment and provide copies of that report upon 

completion. 

6 

(Continuing) GCMRC (Ted Melis) will endeavor to provide 

copies of the HBC Genetics report being done by Mike and 

Marlis Douglas. GMCRC will provide copies of the draft report by 

July 31, 2004, or sooner, in order to present to the AMWG at 

their August 9-10, 2004, meeting. 

 

7 

GMCRC (Ted Melis) will endeavor to provide copies of the 

Feasibility Assessment on Augmentation and Refugia and 

provide copies of the report to the TWG upon completion, and to 

the AMWG for their August 9-10, 2004, meeting. 

Update: 5/3/04: Bruce Taubert indicated on the Science 

Advisors’ river trip that he would be willing to provide money to 

conduct a feasibility assessment for growout ponds in terraces 

above the Little Colorado River. Bill Persons will get an official 

statement from Bruce on what he committed to do and report 

back at the next TWG meeting. 

 

8 

Jeff Lovich will send out an agenda and more details as needed 

for the Core Monitoring AHG meeting. The group will work on a 

timeline, table of contents, deliverable due dates. Done. 

9 

Randy Seaholm and Glen Knowles will draft a letter to the Upper 

Basin to get the HBC Genetics Management Plan completed. Done. 

10 

(NEW) TWG Members will work with their AMWG members in 

identifying the AMP’s top 3 highest priorities for core monitoring 

(2 pages max) and send to Jeff Lovich by May 12. 

11 

(NEW) GCMRC and USBR will develop a visual matrix or flow 

chart that explains how the Long Term Experimental Plan, the 

Core Monitoring Plan, the AMP Strategic Plan, etc. fit together 

and present at the next TWG Meeting. 

12 

(NEW) Linda will post the current Strategic Plan and INs 

documents to the AMP web site and will send an e-mail message 

to the TWG once they are posted. 

Done on 5/11/04. See web addresses: 

http://www.usbr.gov/uc/envprog/amp/strategic_pla

n.html 

http://www.usbr.gov/uc/envprog/amp/amwg/mtgs/

03jan28/Attach_09.pdf

13 

Reclamation (Dennis Kubly) will confer with the Secretary’s 

Designee (Michael Gabaldon) on the projects TWG approved for 

deferral from FY04 to FY05 per GCMRC’s recommendations to 

see how they should be handled.
# C_2005251EN.01001101.xml

| 11.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 251/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 251/11

---

Notification by the Czech Republic concerning visa reciprocity (1)

1

(2005/C 251/16)

The Permanent Representation of the Czech Republic to the EU presents its compliments to the Council of the European Union and has the honour to express its appreciation for the Council of the European Union once again for its continued cooperation and support on various matters related to the everyday conduct of duties of the Permanent Representation. In view of the amicable and working atmosphere existing between the Council of the European Union and the Permanent Representation, the latter wishes to use this opportunity to bring to the attention of the Council of the European Union the following issue.

The Czech Republic officially notifies the countries which despite of the fact the Czech Republic being a Member State of the EU since 1 May 2004 still apply the unilateral visa regime to the Czech citizens.

By this note on the basis of Article 2 of Council Regulation (EC) No 851/2005 of 2 June 2005 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visa when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement, the Czech Republic notifies the United States of America as the country which unilaterally applies the visa regime to the nationals of the Czech Republic.

As the visa reciprocity issue is considered to be a very sensitive problem on political level the Czech Republic believes that the appropriate measures will be taken to assure that all EU citizens on one side and the citizens of the United States of America on the other side will enjoy the same equal and reciprocal regime when crossing the respective borders.

The Permanent Representation of the Czech Republic to the European Union avails itself of this opportunity to renew to the Council of the European Union the assurances of its highest consideration and friendship.

---

(1)  This notification is published in conformity with Article 2 of Council Regulation (EC) No 851/2005 of 2 June 2005 (OJ L 141, 4.6.2005, p. 3) amending Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 of 15 March 2001 (OJ L 81, 21.3.2001, p. 1).

1

---
Revised 2-8-00 

TERM DEFINITION

Goals Goals clarify the mission statement by translating it into major 

program directions. Goals are broad statements of the long-term 

results to be achieved. The goals are the link between the global 

mission statement and the specific measurable objectives. 

 

Management Objectives Management Objectives (MOs) translate the goals into operational 

terms. MOs define measurable desired future resource conditions. 

They are “WHAT” you want the future resource condition to be. 

They should be (SMART): 

1. Specific 

2. Measurable 

3. Achievable 

4. Results-oriented 

5. Time-specific 

Several MOs can contribute to the achievement of a single goal. 

Information Needs INs define the specific knowledge or understanding (i.e., 

information) one needs for knowing if an MO is achievable and 

what actions one would take to achieve the desired resource 

condition identified in the MO. They define “WHAT YOU NEED 

TO KNOW.” 

Management Actions MAs define specific management actions that are needed to 

achieve a desired future resource condition (i.e., accomplish a 

management objective). They define “HOW YOU ARE GOING 

TO REACH YOUR OBJECTIVE.” They should have a timeline 

and a target completion date. 

Based on definitions contained in Glen Canyon Dam MOs (6/10/98), Vision of the Vision: How the Pieces Fit 

Together (10/21/99), and work done by the AMWG Ad hoc Strategic Planning Group.
I

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2071

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 25, 1998

Referred to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

AN ACT

To extend a quarterly financial report program administered

by the Secretary of Commerce.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 2071 RFH

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF QUARTERLY FINANCIAL RE2 PORT PROGRAM.

3 Section 4(b) of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to amend

4 title 13, United States Code, to transfer responsibility for

5 the quarterly financial report from the Federal Trade

6 Commission to the Secretary of Commerce, and for other

7 purposes’’, approved January 12, 1983 (Public Law 97–

8 454; 13 U.S.C. 91 note), is amended by striking ‘‘Septem9 ber 30, 1998’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2005’’.

Passed the Senate September 10, 1998.

Attest: GARY SISCO,

Secretary.
# C_2005325EN.01000601.xml

| 22.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 325/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 325/6

---

Information concerning complaint No 2005/4347

(2005/C 325/06)

On 18 October 2005 the Commission addressed Italy a letter for formal notice concerning the abovementioned complaint, regarding the management of water in the Lago d'Idro area, with reference to a site of relevance under Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora.

This infringement procedure does not relate to the violation of the provisions of Directive 92/43/EEC in the specific case, but to the violation of Article 10 EC Treaty due to the failure by Italy to cooperate with the Commission in providing the information requested by the Commission.

---
Document

  
EXECUTION COPY
Exhibit 10.8 







Via E-Mail: mitra.oneill@gmail.com
Mitra Hormozi, Esq.
205 West 57th Street Apt. 6C
New York, NY 10019


Dear Mitra:


This letter agreement confirms our mutual understanding that you will cease providing Legal Advisory Services under the Consulting Agreement, by and among you, Revlon, Inc. and Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, dated as of November 7, 2019  (the “Consulting Agreement”).  Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Consulting Agreement.


Effective April 1, 2020, you will cease providing Legal Advisory Services, and will cease receiving Legal Advisory Services Pay. Legal Advisory Services Pay for any Legal Advisory Services rendered prior to April 1, 2020 shall be paid to you on the Regular Payment Date. The CEO may reinstate the Legal Advisory Services and payment of the Legal Advisory Service Pay when she deems appropriate, in her sole discretion, exercised reasonably.


The parties agree that cessation of the Legal Advisory Services under the Consulting Agreement pursuant to this letter agreement does not constitute a termination of the Consulting Agreement and does not trigger any rights or remedies pursuant to Section 1(d), or any other provision, of the Consulting Agreement.


All other terms of the Consulting Agreement will remain in place during the Term unless further amended by written agreement between the parties. 


Please indicate your agreement by signing below.


Sincerely,


/s/ Ely Bar-Ness


Ely Bar-Ness
Chief Human Resources Officer




I agree with and accept the terms set forth above:






									
	/s/ Mitra Hormozi
		Date: As of March 30, 2020

	Mitra Hormozi
No. 76-111.

#### Salvucci *v.*New Hampshire Jockey Club, Inc., et al.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
The State of



# Fourth Court of Appeals
**San Antonio, Texas**

June 10, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00045

- CR

Freddie Lee SCOTT

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2009CR6965 Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

On June 3, 2015, Appellant’s court

- appointed counsel filed an Anders brief and a motion to withdraw in companion appeals numbered 04

- 15

- 00045

- CR and 04

- 15

- 0046

- CR. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). In counsel’s certification to this court, Appellant’s counsel expl ained that she took the following steps:

(1) notified Appellant that counsel filed an Anders brief and a motion to withdraw, and provided Appellant with a copy of the documents;
(2) advised Appellant of his right to review the appellate record and file a pro se br ief;
(3) advised Appellant of his right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review should the court of appeals determine the appeal is frivolous; and
(4) provided Appellant with a pro se motion for access to the appellate record, addressed to the Fourth C ourt of Appeals, that lacked only Appellant’s dated signature.

See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 318

– 20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); Ex parte Owens

, 206 S.W.3d 670 , 674 n. 28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006); Meza v. State , 206 S.W.3d 684 , 688

– 89 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006 ).The State filed a letter conditionally waiving its right to file a brief.

If Appellant desires to file a pro se brief, we ORDER Appellant to do so within thirty days of the date of this order

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(a). If Appellant files a pr o se brief, the State may file a responsive brief not later than thirty days after the date Appellant’s pro se brief
is filed in this court. See id. R. 38.6(b).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is HELD IN ABEYANCE pending further order of this

court.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court o n this 10th day of June, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
IIB 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1684 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 27, 2016 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

AN ACT 

To amend the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 and the Federal 

Water Pollution Control Act to impose penalties and 

provide for the recovery of removal costs and damages 

in connection with certain discharges of oil from foreign 

offshore units, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1684 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Foreign Spill Protec3 tion Act of 2016’’. 

4 SEC. 2. LIABILITY OF OWNERS AND OPERATORS OF FOR5 EIGN FACILITIES. 

6 (a) OIL POLLUTION CONTROL ACT AMENDMENTS.— 

7 Section 1001 of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (33 U.S.C. 

8 2701) is amended— 

9 (1) in paragraph (26)(A)— 

10 (A) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘onshore or 

11 offshore facility, any person’’ and inserting ‘‘on12 shore facility, offshore facility, or foreign off13 shore unit or other facility located seaward of 

14 the exclusive economic zone, any person or enti15 ty’’; and 

16 (B) in clause (iii), by striking ‘‘offshore fa17 cility, the person who’’ and inserting ‘‘offshore 

18 facility or foreign offshore unit or other facility 

19 located seaward of the exclusive economic zone, 

20 the person or entity that’’; and 

21 (2) in paragraph (32)— 

22 (A) by redesignating subparagraphs (D) 

23 through (F) as subparagraphs (E) through (G), 

24 respectively; 

25 (B) by inserting after subparagraph (C) 

26 the following: 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 1684 RFS

1 ‘‘(D) FOREIGN FACILITIES.—In the case of 

2 a foreign offshore unit or other facility located 

3 seaward of the exclusive economic zone, any 

4 person or other entity owning or operating the 

5 facility, and any leaseholder, permit holder, as6 signee, or holder of a right of use and easement 

7 granted under applicable foreign law for the 

8 area in which the facility is located.’’; and 

9 (C) in subparagraph (G), as so redesig10 nated, by striking ‘‘or offshore facility, the per11 sons who’’ and inserting ‘‘, offshore facility, or 

12 foreign offshore unit or other facility located 

13 seaward of the exclusive economic zone, the per14 sons or entities that’’. 

15 (b) FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ACT

16 AMENDMENTS.—Section 311(a) of the Federal Water Pol17 lution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1321(a)(11)) is amended— 

18 (1) by striking ‘‘and any facility’’ and inserting 

19 ‘‘any facility’’; and 

20 (2) by inserting ‘‘, and, for the purposes of ap21 plying subsections (b), (c), (e), and (o), any foreign 

22 offshore unit (as defined in section 1001 of the Oil 

23 Pollution Act) or any other facility located seaward 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
4 

HR 1684 RFS

1 of the exclusive economic zone’’ after ‘‘public ves2 sel’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 26, 2016. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

DAVID J. SCHUBERT, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

ROSEBRG VA MEDICAL CENTER, 

Defendant. 

COFFIN, Magistrate Judge: 

Civil No. 6:15-cv-0 1755-TC 

FINDINGS AND 

RECO:MMENDATION 

This court issued an order to show cause why defendant Roseburg 

Medical Center's unopposed motion ( #7) to dismiss should not be 

allowed after plaintiff failed to respond to such motion. Plaintiff 

was ordered to respond within twenty days and cautioned that a failure 

to respond would result in the dismissal of this action for failure 

to prosecute and failure to comply with a court order. Plaintiff has 

not responded. As such, this action should be dismissed for failure 

to prosecute, failure to comply with a court order, and for the 

reasons stated in the defendant's motion. The five factors for 

Case 6:15-cv-01755-TC Document 15 Filed 04/22/16 Page 1 of 2
dismissal discussed in Malone v. United States Postal Service, 833 

F.2d 128 (9th Cir. 1987) have been weighed and indicate that dismissal 

is proper. 

DATED this ~~ day of April, 2016. 

United Judge 

2 - FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

Case 6:15-cv-01755-TC Document 15 Filed 04/22/16 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1679 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1679

To ensure the safe transportation of Bakken crude oil by rail, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 26, 2015

Mr. Garamendi introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To ensure the safe transportation of Bakken crude oil by rail, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Bakken Crude Stabilization Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. BAKKEN CRUDE OIL.

    (a) In General.--Bakken crude oil may only be transported by rail 
if the oil has a Reid vapor pressure of not more than 9.5 pounds per 
square inch, the maximum volatility set by the New York Mercantile 
Exchange for crude oil futures contracts.
    (b) Application.--Subsection (a) shall apply to the transportation 
of Bakken crude oil occurring on and after the date that is 90 days 
after the date of enactment of this Act.
    (c) Actions by the Secretary.--The Secretary of Transportation is 
authorized to take such action as is necessary to implement this 
section.
                                 <all>
```
Jilt!tl1Dtstrirtof(Esxasat3UntlasJUDGMENTTHESTATEOFTEXAS,AppellantNo.05-96-01890-CRRONNIEROBINSON,AppelleeV.AppealfromtheCountyCourtatLawofCollinCounty,Texas.(Tr.Ct.No.001-83831-94).OpiniondeliveredbyJusticeWhittington,JusticesMaloneyandBridgesalsoparticipating.BasedontheCourt’sopinionofthisdate,thejudgmentofthetrialcourtisAFFIRMEDViAMARKWHIflINGTOJESTICE(!tourtof1ppsa1sJudgmententeredJune25,1997.4