alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND FROM THE INCOME STATEMENT FOR
THE 3 MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                         DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                   179,504
<SECURITIES>                                             631,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                          2,725,522
<ALLOWANCES>                                              95,000
<INVENTORY>                                            4,817,522
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       8,610,590
<PP&E>                                                 4,005,374
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        14,297,670
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  3,712,588
<BONDS>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                 105,603
<OTHER-SE>                                             6,806,723
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          14,297,670
<SALES>                                                6,731,699
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       6,731,699
<CGS>                                                  4,295,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          4,295,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           4,066
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       194,002
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          198,427
<INCOME-TAX>                                              59,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      139,427
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                             139,427
<EPS-BASIC>                                                  .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                .04



</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6132

JOHN EDWARD JONES, Petitioner - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-98-730) Submitted: September 29, 2000 Decided: October 12, 2000 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Edward Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Fenita Morris Shepard, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: John Edward Jones appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewedthe record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Jones v. United States Parole Comm’n , No. CA-98-730 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 1, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### John G. Johnston, Jr., et al., Appellants, v Tarsi Katsoulakis, Respondent

Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

July 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130780 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130780 

 COA: 267482 

Wayne CC: 04-006500-01

AARON DENEAL McDONALD, 04-006503-01 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 9, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0724 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 31, 2006 

 Clerk
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Lauren M. Rule (OSB #015174)

Elizabeth Zultoski (OSB #105482)

ADVOCATES FOR THE WEST

3115 NE Sandy Blvd., Ste. 223

Portland, OR 97232

(503) 914-6388

lrule@advocateswest.org

ezultoski@advocateswest.org

David H. Becker (OSB # 081507)

Law Office of David H. Becker, LLC

833 SE Main Street, #302

Portland, OR 97214

davebeckerlaw@gmail.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

MEDFORD DIVISION

OREGON WILD, an Oregon non-profit corporation, Case No. 1:15-cv-00895-CL

FRIENDS OF LIVING OREGON WATERS, an

Oregon non-profit corporation, and WESTERN CORPORATE DISCLOSURE

WATERSHEDS PROJECT, an Idaho non-profit STATEMENT

corporation,

Plaintiffs,

v.

U.S. FOREST SERVICE, a federal agency, and

U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE, a federal

agency,

Defendants.

Case 1:15-cv-00895-CL Document 6 Filed 07/27/15 Page 1 of 2
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT - 1

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, Plaintiff Oregon Wild states that it is a 

non-profit organization that has no parent corporation and does not issue stock.

Dated: July 27, 2015 Respectfully submitted, 

 s/ Elizabeth H. Zultoski

Elizabeth H. Zultoski, OSB #105482 

Lauren M. Rule OSB # 015174)

ADVOCATES FOR THE WEST 

3115 NE Sandy Blvd., Suite 223 

Portland, OR 97232 

(503) 914-6388 

ezultoski@advocateswest.org

lrule@advocateswest.org 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Case 1:15-cv-00895-CL Document 6 Filed 07/27/15 Page 2 of 2
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of mPhase Technologies,
Inc., a New Jersey corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10K/A for the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "Report"), I, Ronald A. Durando, Chief Executive Officer of the Company
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

> 1.
>   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
> 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
> 2.
>   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
> material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
> Company.

/s/ Ronald A. DurandoRonald A. DurandoChief
Executive OfficerApril 21, 2010

---
ATTACHMENT C

Case 3:14-cv-01772-MO Document 33-3 Filed 04/10/15 Page 1 of 13
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Morris KURTZ, Defendant, and Allstate-Cornell Uniform, Inc., Garnishee.

Civ. A. No. 76-313.

United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

April 6, 1982.

*18James G. Sheehan, Asst. U.S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

Albert J. Olizi, Jr., Sidkoff, Pincus, Greenberg & Green, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

Wilbur Greenberg, Sidkoff, Pincus, Greenberg & Green, Philadelphia, Pa., for garnishee.

ORDER

EDWARD R. BECKER, Circuit Judge, Sitting by Designation.

AND NOW, this 6th day of April 1982, upon consideration of garnishee Allstate-Cornell Uniform’s motion to have the judgment set aside and of plaintiff United States’ response thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that garnishee’s motion is DENIED.*

*

 Garnishee seeks to have the judgment set aside on two grounds. First, garnishee asserts that wages are not subject to garnishment under the laws of Pennsylvania, *see*42 Pa.Cons.Stat.Ann. § 8127 (Purdon Supp.1980). The Third Circuit has determined that the Pennsylvania statute barring garnishment of wages is not applicable to the United States because it is not applicable to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. *United States v. Miller,*229 F.2d 839, 841 (3d Cir. 1956) (construing former 42 Pa.Stat.Ann. § 886, *recodifíed at*42 Pa.Cons.Stat.Ann. § 8127 (Purdon Supp.1980)). The passage of the Consumer Credit Protection Act of 1968 tit. III, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1671-1677 (1976 & Supp. IV 1980) does not affect the *Miller*holding, except that both the United States and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania are subject to the limitations on garnishment of wages set out in the Act, *see*15 U.S.C. § 1673 (1976 & Supp. IV 1980).

Second, garnishee asserts that the wages that are the subject of the judgment had already been paid to defendant Kurtz at the time the judgment was entered. Pa.R.Civ.P. 3111(b), which prescribes the procedure for garnishment, see Fed.R.Civ.P. 69, provides that service of the writ of execution attached the wages in the possession of the garnishee and wages that came due after service of the writ but before entry of the judgment.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

PENDLETON DIVISION 

SIR GIORGIO SANFORD CLARDY, 

No. 2:15-cv-02098-CL 

Plaintiff, 

OPINION AND ORDER 

v. 

"JANE" HASCALL, et al., 

Defendants. 

MOSMAN,J., 

On August 12, 2016, Magistrate Judge Clarke issued his Findings and Recommendation 

("F&R") [7], recommending that the Court dismiss Mr. Clardy's Complaint [2] sua sponte for 

failure to state a claim. Mr. Clardy objected [14]. Upon careful review, I agree with Judge • 

Clarke's recommendations and I ADOPT the F&R [7] as my own. 

DISCUSSION 

The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may 

file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge, 

but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to 

make a de novo determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or 

recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(C). However, the court 

is not required to review, de novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of 

1 - OPINION AND ORDER 

Case 2:15-cv-02098-CL Document 15 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 2
the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See 

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 

(9th Cir. 2003 ). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F &R 

depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject, 

or modify any part of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(C). 

Upon careful review, I agree with Judge Clarke's recommendation and I ADOPT the 

F&R [7] as my own opinion. Mr. Clardy's Complaint is dismissed [2] for failure to state a 

claim. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this '2-\ day of November, 2016. 

£tiiN~ Chief United States District Judge 

2 - OPINION AND ORDER 

Case 2:15-cv-02098-CL Document 15 Filed 11/21/16 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET OF REGENT ASSISTED LIVING, INC. AS OF JUNE 30, 1997, AND
THE RELATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS IN THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE
30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           5,307,520
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      275,937
<ALLOWANCES>                                        27,000
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,905,619
<PP&E>                                          33,314,434
<DEPRECIATION>                                     365,135
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,259,982
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,342,187
<BONDS>                                         16,945,754
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           10,808,703
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         9,349,841
<OTHER-SE>                                       (941,399)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,259,982
<SALES>                                          6,540,097
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,628,218
<CGS>                                            4,333,901
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,331,951
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 101,228
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (564,766)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (24,500)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (540,266)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (540,266)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.18)
        

</TABLE>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Pest Management Research: Sidney, MT
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    NPARL
                        Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory
                                    Agricultural Systems Research Unit
                                    Grasshoppers: Their Biology, Identification and ManagementSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Sidney, Montana Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory Pest Management Research People & Locations







Hallie  Schantz
                        Pest Management Research

                        




                        
                        Biological Science Aid
                        Phone: (406) 433-2020
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
**Exhibit23****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8(Nos. 33-24621, 33-54577, 33-63273, 33-54583, 333-58039, 333-69726, 333-100342,333-111214, 333-111215, and 333-147882) of Dell Inc. (formerly Dell Computer Corporation) of our report datedMarch 31, 2008, relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, and the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K**.**
# C_2006194EN.01003801.xml

| 18.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 194/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 194/38

---

Notice regarding the adaptation in line with inflation of certain amounts laid down in the Life and Non-Life Insurance Directives

(2006/C 194/07)

In accordance with Article 30 of Directive 2002/83/EC (1) concerning life assurance, the amount laid down in euro in Article 29(2) was reviewed in 2005 in order to take account of changes in the European index of consumer prices comprising all Member States as published by Eurostat. As a result of the review, the amount laid down in euro is increased from EUR 3 000 000 to EUR 3 200 000. The Commission Services have informed the European Parliament and the Council of the review and the adapted amount.

1

In accordance with Article 17a of Directive 73/239/EEC (2) on the coordination of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the taking-up and pursuit of the business of direct insurance other than life assurance, as amended by Directive 2002/13/EC (3), the amounts laid down in euro in Article 16(a) (3) and (4) and Article 17(2) were reviewed in 2005 in order to take account of changes in the European index of consumer prices comprising all Member States as published by Eurostat. As a result of the review, the amount laid down in euro in Article 16(a)(3) is increased from EUR 50 000 000 to EUR 53 100 000. The amount laid down in euro in Article 16(a)(4) is increased from EUR 35 000 000 to EUR 37 200 000. The amounts laid down in euro in Article 17(2) are increased from EUR 2 000 000 to EUR 2 200 000 and from EUR 3 000 000 to EUR 3 200 000 respectively. The Commission Services have informed the European Parliament and the Council of the review and the adapted amounts.

2

3

---

(1)  OJ L 345, 19.12.2002, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 228, 16.8.1973, p. 3.

2

(3)  OJ L 77, 20.3.2002, p. 17.

3

---
Exhibit 10.2





         


AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO TO THE AMERICAN
PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.


EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN


 


The American Public Education, Inc. Employee
Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”) is hereby amended (this “Amendment”) as set forth below by the Board of
Directors of American Public Education, Inc. (the “Corporation”), subject to the approval of this Amendment by the
stockholders of the Corporation:


 


1.           The
first sentence of Section 2 of the ESPP is amended and restated to read as follows:


 


“Subject to adjustment as provided
in Section 26 below, the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be made available for purchase by participating
employees under the Plan is three hundred thousand (300,000).”


 


2.           
The last sentence of Section 25 of the ESPP is amended and restated to read as follows:


 


“In any event, the Plan shall, without
further action of the Board, terminate on May 15, 2030, or, if earlier, at such time as all shares of Common Stock that may be
made available for purchase under the Plan pursuant to Section 2 above have been issued.”


 


3.           The
ESPP shall otherwise be unchanged by this Amendment.


 


4.           This
Amendment is adopted subject to approval by the stockholders of the Corporation at the Corporation’s 2020 Annual Meeting
of Stockholders.  If the stockholders fail to approve this Amendment at the Annual Meeting, the ESPP shall continue in
existence in accordance with its terms.


 


*           *           *


 


The foregoing Amendment to the ESPP was
duly adopted and approved by the Board of Directors of the Corporation on March 30, 2020, subject to the approval of the Amendment
by the stockholders of the Corporation.


 


 


	 	/s/ Thomas A. Beckett
	 	Secretary


 


The foregoing Amendment to the ESPP was
duly adopted by the stockholders of the Corporation at a meeting held on May 15, 2020.


 


 


	 	/s/ Thomas A. Beckett
	 	Secretary
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Thomas Ryan, Appellant.

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We agree with defendant’s contention that portions of the court’s charge on corroboration were erroneous. However, defendant failed to object to the charge and thus has failed to preserve this contention for our review *(People v Thomas,*50 NY2d 467, 471; *People v Palmer,*26 AD2d 892, 893). We decline to review the error in the interest of justice and conclude, in any case, that the charge as a whole did not deprive defendant of a fair trial.

We have examined defendant’s other contentions and conclude that they are without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Niagara County Court, DiFlorio, J. — rape, first degree, and sodomy, first degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Denman, Boomer, Pine and Balio, JJ.
# L_2009127EN.01000901.xml

| 26.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 127/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 127/9

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 12 May 2009

on the European Capital of Culture event for the year 2012

(2009/400/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Decision No 1622/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 2006 establishing a Community action for the European Capital of Culture event for the years 2007 to 2019 (1), and in particular its Article 14,

Having regard to the selection panel report of 5 November 2008 submitted to the Commission, to the European Parliament and to the Council in accordance with Article 14(2) of Decision No 1622/2006/EC,

Considering that the criteria referred to in Article 14(3) of Decision No 1622/2006/EC are entirely fulfilled,

Having regard to the recommendation from the Commission of 8 April 2009,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

Guimarães (Portugal) and Maribor (Slovenia) are designated as ‘European Capital of Culture 2012’ in accordance with Article 14 of Decision No 1622/2006/EC.

Done at Brussels, 12 May 2009.

For the Council

The President

M. KOPICOVÁ

---

(1)  
  OJ L 304, 3.11.2006, p. 1.

1

---