alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1710 

To amend the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 to 

provide additional financing options for water infrastructure projects 

carried out in States in which the Governor of the State has issued 

a state of drought emergency declaration, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 26, 2015 

Mr. MCNERNEY (for himself, Ms. MATSUI, and Mr. HONDA) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 

and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Water Resources Reform and Development 

Act of 2014 to provide additional financing options for 

water infrastructure projects carried out in States in 

which the Governor of the State has issued a state 

of drought emergency declaration, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1710 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Drought Resilience In3 vestment Act of 2015’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FINANCING OF WATER INFRASTRUCTURE 

5 PROJECTS IN STATES WITH DROUGHT DEC6 LARATIONS. 

7 Section 5028(a) of the Water Resources Reform and 

8 Development Act of 2014 (128 Stat. 1336) is amended— 

9 (1) in paragraph (5) by striking ‘‘No project’’ 

10 and inserting ‘‘Except as provided in paragraph (8), 

11 no project’’; and 

12 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

13 ‘‘(8) PROJECTS IN STATES WITH DROUGHT

14 DECLARATIONS.— 

15 ‘‘(A) EXEMPTION.—Paragraph (5) shall 

16 not apply with respect to a project carried out 

17 in a State during any period in which the State 

18 has in effect a state of drought declaration 

19 issued by the Governor of the State. 

20 ‘‘(B) PERIOD OF STATE OF DROUGHT DEC21 LARATION.—For purposes of subparagraph (A), 

22 a state of drought declaration shall remain in 

23 effect until the date on which the Governor re24 scinds the declaration. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1710 IH

1 ‘‘(C) SUNSET DATE.—This paragraph shall 

2 cease to apply beginning on September 30, 

3 2018.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 32

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

Robert Portman, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Stephen P. Kuchen,
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of PacificHealth Laboratories, Inc.
(the "Company"), each certify in his capacity as an officer of the Company that
he has reviewed the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the
quarter ended September 30, 2003 and that to the best of his knowledge:

1) the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


DATE: November 7, 2003            By: /S/ ROBERT PORTMAN
                                   --------------------------------------------
                                   Robert Portman,
                                   President and Chief Executive Officer
                                   (Principal Executive Officer)



DATE: November 7, 2003            By: /S/ STEPHEN P. KUCHEN
                                   --------------------------------------------
                                   Stephen P. Kuchen,
                                   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                                  (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
EX-99


                                CERTIFICATION OF
                           PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                       AND
                          PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER
                        PURSUANT TO 18 O.K. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying  Annual Report on Form 10-KSB (the `Report")
of  Amplidyne,  Inc.  (the  "Company")  for the year end  December  31,  2003, I
Devendar S. Bains,  Chief Executive Officer and Principal  Accounting Officer of
the Company,  hereby  certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  to the best of my
knowledge and belief, that:

      1     The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2     The information  contained in the report,  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ Devendar S. Bains                                 April 14, 2004
--------------------------
Devendar S. Bains
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer



                                       56
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 12.01

                           CARAUSTAR INDUSTRIES, INC.

               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES*
                             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

<Table>
<Caption>
                                              1997       1998      1999      2000     2001(1)
                                             -------   --------   -------   -------   --------
<S>                                          <C>       <C>        <C>       <C>       <C>
EARNINGS:
Income (loss) from continuing operations
  before income taxes, minority interest,
  reversal of loss on discontinued
  operations and cumulative effect of
  accounting changes.......................  $83,188   $ 83,053   $64,445   $13,829   $(17,990)
Equity in income of
  less-than-50-percent-owned Entities......      (40)        12        --        --         --
Fixed charges..............................   16,536     19,469    30,528    41,776     50,099
Less capitalized interest expense..........       --       (219)     (626)     (852)        --
                                             -------   --------   -------   -------   --------
Earnings...................................  $99,684   $102,315   $94,347   $54,753   $ 32,109
                                             =======   ========   =======   =======   ========
FIXED CHARGES:
Interest expense...........................  $14,111   $ 16,072   $25,735   $35,730   $ 43,171
Amortization of debt issuance costs........       --         --       142       737      1,989
Estimate of the interest cost within rental
  expense..................................    2,425      3,178     4,025     4,457      4,939
Capitalized interest expense...............       --        219       626       852         --
                                             -------   --------   -------   -------   --------
Fixed charges..............................  $16,536   $ 19,469   $30,528   $41,776   $ 50,099
                                             =======   ========   =======   =======   ========
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges.........     6.03       5.26      3.09      1.31       0.64(2)
                                             =======   ========   =======   =======   ========
</Table>

---------------

  * Restated to reflect the change in the inventory costing method of accounting
    from LIFO to FIFO at one of the Company's subsidiaries. See Note 1 for
    additional information.

(1) Excludes the extraordinary loss on early extinguishment of debt.

(2) The 2001 earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges. The cover
    deficiency was $18.0 million.
WILBORN LAW OFFICE, P.C.

TIM WILBORN, Attorney at Law — OSB # 944644

tim@wilbornlaw.com

P.O. Box 370578

Las Vegas, NV 89137

Voice: (702) 240-0184

Fax: (503) 926-9133

 Attorney for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON

KAY GRAHAM, Case No. 3:15-cv-1560-HZ

Plaintiff,

vs. ORDER

COMMISSIONER of Social Security,

Defendant.

Attorney fees in the amount of $8,600.00 are hereby awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to the

Equal Access To Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). Subject to any offset allowed under the Treasury

Offset Program, payment of this award shall be made via check sent to Tim Wilborn’s address: P.O.

Box 370578, Las Vegas, NV 89137. In accordance with the fee assignment which Plaintiff has

signed, payment shall be made in Tim Wilborn’s name if no debt subject to offset exists.

DATED this ____ day of ________________, 2016.

__________________________________________

United States District Court Judge

Submitted on November 8, 2016 by:

s/ Tim Wilborn

TIM WILBORN, OSB # 944644

(702) 240-0184

 Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER - Page 1

Case 3:15-cv-01560-HZ Document 20 Filed 11/10/16 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION




The undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Inter Parfums, Inc., that the Annual Report of Inter Parfums, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Inter Parfums, Inc.




Date: March 8, 2011
By:
/s/ Jean MadarJean Madar,Chief Executive Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Inter Parfums, Inc. and will be retained by Inter Parfums, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### BRAINE v. ROSSWOG.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July, 1896.)

Action by Mary Braine against Julie Rosswog.

No opinion. Motion denied.
#### In the Matter of Melvin Kimbrough, Petitioner, v Brian Fischer, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, et al., Respondents.

[946 NYS2d 714]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

*1252After the personal property in petitioner’s cell had been packed up in preparation for a move to another facility, a correction officer observed petitioner pass documents contained in a booklet entitled “Urban Books” to another inmate through his cell bars. The officer reviewed the documents and found that they contained references to, among other things, black nationalism. Thereafter, the officer prepared a misbehavior report charging petitioner with possessing gang-related material, possessing unauthorized organizational material, possessing an item in an unauthorized area and smuggling. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty of the charges. On administrative appeal, the charge of possessing gang-related material was dismissed, but the remaining charges were upheld. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We must annul the determination. On the record before us, we cannot conclude that substantial evidence supports the determination finding petitioner guilty of possessing unauthorized organizational material. The disciplinary rule at issue provides, in pertinent part, that “[a]n inmate shall not . . . possess printed or handwritten material relating to an unauthorized organization where such material advocates either expressly or by clear implication, violence based upon race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, creed, law enforcement status or violence or acts of disobedience against department employees or that could facilitate organizational activity within the institution by an unauthorized organization” (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [6] [v]). Significantly, the documents that petitioner possessed did not refer to any particular organization nor did they advocate violence or acts of disobedience *(compare Matter of Baez v Goord,*264 AD2d 916 [1999]). Further, as no evidence was presented in the misbehavior report, the hearing testimony, or elsewhere in the record to sustain the remaining charges on a basis independent of a finding that the materials petitioner possessed were unauthorized, those charges must also be annulled.

Mercure, J.P., Spain, Kavanagh, McCarthy and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is annulled, without costs, petition granted and respondent Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision is directed to expunge all references thereto from petitioner’s institutional record and to restore any good time taken from petitioner as a result thereof.
# L_2009135EN.01002801.xml

| 30.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 135/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 135/28

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 25 May 2009

appointing one Belgian member of the European Economic and Social Committee

(2009/419/EC, Euratom)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 259 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 167 thereof,

Having regard to Decision 2006/651/EC, Euratom (1),

Having regard to the proposal of the Belgian Government,

Having regard to the opinion of the Commission,

Whereas a member’s seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the resignation of Ms Christine FAES,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Mr Ronny LANNOO, Adviseur-generaal UNIZO, is hereby appointed as a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 20 September 2010.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 25 May 2009.

For the Council

The President

J. ŠEBESTA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 269, 28.9.2006, p. 13.

1

---
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Livestock and Range Research Laboratory: Miles City, MT
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Public Notice
                        Recent Notices
                                    2024 School Tours
                    2024 Research Animal Sale On-line AuctionSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Miles City, Montana Livestock and Range Research Laboratory Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications
- IACUC Executive Summaries

IACUC Executive Summariesheadline bar IACUC Executive Summaries Click on the date to see the .pdf file. Miles City 2-13-2024


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 23

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-16543) pertaining to the Atria Communities, Inc. 1996 Stock
Ownership Incentive Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-
16545) pertaining to the Atria Communities, Inc. Nonemployee Directors 1996
Stock Incentive Plan, and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-
34093) pertaining to the Atria Communities, Inc. Vencor Employees' Stock
Option Agreements, of our report dated February 11, 1998 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Atria Communities, Inc. included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1997.

                                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Louisville, Kentucky
March 25, 1998
# C_2006034EN.01000401.xml

| 10.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 34/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 34/4

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(2006/C 34/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

Date of adoption:

Member State: Portugal (Região Autónoma dos Açores)

Região Autónoma dos Açores)

Aid No: N 360/2005

Title: Modification of the existing State aid scheme for Regional Development of the Azores — SIDER (N 563/2000)

Objective: Regional development (Industry, construction, distribution, tourism and services)

Legal basis: Decreto Legislativo Regional n.o 26/2000/A, de 10 de Agosto, que criou o SIDER — Sistema de Incentivos para o desenvolvimento Regional dos Açores; Decreto Regulamentar Regional n.o 6/2001/A de 6 de Junho, que regulamenta o subsistema para o Desenvolvimento Local — SIDEL; Decreto Regulamentar Regional n.o 4/2001/A, de 6 de Junho, que regulamenta o subsistema para o Desenvolvimento do Turismo — SIDET; Decreto Regulamentar Regional n.o 5/2001/A, de 6 de Junho, que regulamenta o subsistema de Prémios — SIDEP

o

o

o

o

Budget: EUR 63,132 million

Intensity or amount: Variable depending on the investment project, the type of enterprise and the assisted zone

Duration: Until 31.12.2006

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/secretariat_general/sgb/state_aids/

Date of adoption:

Member State: Germany

Aid No: N 454/2005

Title in original language: Innovation und neue Energietechnologien — das 5. Energieforschungsprogramm der Bundesregierung

Objective: Research and development (All sectors)

Legal basis: Jeweiliges jährliches Bundeshaushaltsgesetz mit den Einzelplänen 09, 16, 10 und 30

Budget: EUR 805 200 000

Maximum aid intensity: 75 %, 50 %

Duration:

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/secretariat_general/sgb/state_aids/

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Franklin X. Gallimore, Appellant.

[946 NYS2d 490]

— Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Braslow, J.), rendered September 13, 2010, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court upon a finding that he violated a condition thereof, upon his admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous adjudication as a youthful offender for attempted arson in the third degree. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the *972defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.],*89 AD3d 252 [2011]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Angiolillo, J.P., Florio, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., concur.
NUMBER 13

- 09

- 00 349

- CR



### COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

JOHNNY POLENDO MARTINEZ

, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the 117 th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez

, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Johnny Polendo Martinez , by and through his attorney, has filed a

motion to dismiss his appeal because he no longer desires to prosecute it. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P . 42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to

dismiss pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal.

Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be2

entertained, an d our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed

th e 13th day of May, 2010

.
#### Laurence E. Lewis, Doing Business as Custom Brokers, Respondent-Appellant, v Kenneth Welton et al., Defendants, and Frank Gallea, Appellant-Respondent.

— Judgment unanimously modified, on the law, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Defendant Gallea appeals from a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff in this action to recover a broker’s commission. Plaintiff and Gallea entered into a written commission agreement for the sale of his liquor store, which provides a 10% commission if a party shown the business by plaintiff purchased it. Gallea contends plaintiff failed to prove that he ever physically brought the purchaser to the premises, and therefore did not "show” the premises within the meaning of the agreement. The trial court properly rejected defendant’s motion and submitted the case to the jury.

No evidence having been submitted with respect to the meaning of the word "showed” as used in the agreement, it was for the court in the first instance to construe the document and to interpret its language *(see, Sutton v East Riv. Sav. Bank,*55 NY2d 550, 554-555). The trial court’s use of the dictionary definition of the word "showed” in its charge accorded to the word a "fair and reasonable meaning” *(Heller v Pope,*250 NY 132, 135). The balance of the court’s charge was not objected to by either party. There being evidence in the record to support the verdict, it should not be disturbed *(Tripoli v Tripoli,*83 AD2d 764, *affd*56 NY2d 684).

The court reserved to itself the computation of damages. The agreement defined "sales price” to include the value of inventory. The court erred, therefore, in applying the 10% commission to only the base price exclusive of inventory and the award is increased to $26,310.48. (Appeals from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Siracuse, J. — breach of contract.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Green, Balio, Lawton and Schnepp, JJ.