alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1991 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1991

  To require the Secretary of Transportation to issue regulations to 
   provide for improvements in the conspicuity of rail cars of rail 
                               carriers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 27, 1998

  Mr. Johnson introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Secretary of Transportation to issue regulations to 
   provide for improvements in the conspicuity of rail cars of rail 
                               carriers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. IMPROVED CONSPICUITY OF RAIL CARS.

    (a) In General.--Section 20132 of title 49, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) by striking the heading and inserting the following:
``Sec. 20132. Visible markers for train cars'';
        and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) Improved Conspicuity.--Not later than 180 days after the date 
of enactment of this subsection, the Secretary of Transportation 
shall--
            ``(1) develop and implement a plan to ensure that the 
        requirements of this section are met; and
            ``(2) issue regulations that require that, not later than 2 
        years after the date of issuance of the regulations, all cars 
        of freight, passenger, or commuter trains be equipped, and, if 
        necessary, retrofitted, with at least 1 highly visible marker 
        (including reflective tape or appropriate lighting).''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--The analysis for chapter 201 of title 
49, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to 
section 20132 and inserting the following:

``20132. Visible markers for train cars.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### STEWART, Respondent, v. NEW YORK EL. RY. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.

December 18, 1895.)

Action by Anson B. Stewart against the New York Elevated Railway Company.

J. T. Davies, for appellant.

E. W. Tyler, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment modified by reducing the rental damage to $750 and the extra allowance to $75, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs.
# L_2009173EN.01000401.xml

| 3.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 173/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 173/4

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 22 June 2009

on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Government of Australia on certain aspects of air services

(2009/510/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 80(2) in conjunction with the first sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 300(2) and the first subparagraph of Article 300(3) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament,

Whereas:

| (1) | The Council authorised the Commission on 5 June 2003 to open negotiations with third countries on the replacement of certain provisions in existing bilateral agreements with a Community agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The Council authorised the Commission on 5 June 2003 to open negotiations with third countries on the replacement of certain provisions in existing bilateral agreements with a Community agreement.

| (2) | On behalf of the Community, the Commission has negotiated an Agreement between the European Community and the Government of Australia on certain aspects of air services (1) (the Agreement) in accordance with the mechanisms and directives in the Annex to the Council Decision authorising the Commission to open negotiations with third countries on the replacement of certain provisions in existing bilateral agreements with a Community agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On behalf of the Community, the Commission has negotiated an Agreement between the European Community and the Government of Australia on certain aspects of air services (1) (the Agreement) in accordance with the mechanisms and directives in the Annex to the Council Decision authorising the Commission to open negotiations with third countries on the replacement of certain provisions in existing bilateral agreements with a Community agreement.

| (3) | The Agreement was signed on behalf of the Community on 29 April 2008 subject to its conclusion at a later date, in conformity with Council Decision 2008/420/EC (2). |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Agreement was signed on behalf of the Community on 29 April 2008 subject to its conclusion at a later date, in conformity with Council Decision 2008/420/EC (2).

| (4) | The Agreement should be approved, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The Agreement should be approved,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The Agreement between the European Community and the Government of Australia on certain aspects of air services is hereby approved on behalf of the Community.

Article 2

The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to make the notification provided in Article 7(1) of the Agreement.

Done at Luxembourg, 22 June 2009.

For the Council

The President

J. ŠEBESTA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 149, 7.6.2008, p. 65.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 149, 7.6.2008, p. 63.

2

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information extracted from the Quintel
Entertainment, Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Financial Statement as
presented in the Company's Form 10Q for the quarter ended August 31, 1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                     $12,213,652
<SECURITIES>                                32,119,615
<RECEIVABLES>                               27,724,579
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            84,313,851
<PP&E>                                       1,146,659
<DEPRECIATION>                                 116,351
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             105,346,897
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       44,993,582
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,645
<OTHER-SE>                                  60,315,570
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               105,346,897
<SALES>                                    142,072,114
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           142,072,114
<CGS>                                      110,590,626
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              110,590,626
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,639,093
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              57,133
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             19,012,955
<INCOME-TAX>                                 7,560,789
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         17,842,395
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                11,452,166
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.61
        

</TABLE>
# C_2006267EN.01000201.xml

| 1.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/2

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(2006/C 267/02)

Date of adoption of the decision:

Member State: Spain

Aid No: N 323/05

Title: Aid to promote cooperatives in Castille-Leon

Objective: Direct grants for agricultural cooperatives to promote and develop the agricultural cooperative movement in the Autonomous Community of Castille-Leon

Legal basis: Orden AYG/.../2005, de ... de ..., por la que se establece un regimen de ayudas para promover y fomentar el movimiento cooperativo agrario en la Comunidad Autonoma de Castilla y León

Budget: EUR 342 400 for the 2005 financial year

Aid intensity or amount: Various

Duration:

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/

---
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 29, 2011

y0321 

# Order

March 29, 2011

142034

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142034 COA: 298485 Oakland CC: 2005-202190-FC CHARLES RAY SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 14, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Research Program Support: Ames, IA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Ames, Iowa National Animal Disease Center Research Program Support People & Locations







Scot  Hall
                        Research Program Support

                        




                        
                        Maintenance Mechanic
                        Phone: (515) 357-7442
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
IN THE UNITED ST ATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 6:15CR00263- 1 

V. 

Troy Duane Herring GPS Removal 

FILED 24 Nur, ,.1,..., l 1rff\ l ·t -,.c:. , - , J. ..j·._iJ U'3DC·ORE 

IT IS ORDERED THAT the GPS unit be removed from Mr. Herring on Monday March 

27th as he will be traveling by bus to Danbury FCI to voluntarily surrender. The 

Government does not oppose the removal. 

ITISSOORDEREDTHIS :;)_ 'l: day of rw~7. 

te Judge 

Submitted by U.S. Pretrial Services 

l 

' 

Case 6:15-cr-00263-AA Document 42 Filed 03/24/17 Page 1 of 1
# L_2009330EN.01007701.xml

| 16.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 330/77 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 330/77

---

COUNCIL DECISION 2009/956/CFSP

of 15 December 2009

amending Joint Action 2009/131/CFSP extending the mandate of the European Union Special Representative for the crisis in Georgia

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Treaty on the European Union, and in particular Articles 28, 31(2) and 33 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 25 September 2008, the Council adopted Joint Action 2008/760/CFSP (1) appointing Mr Pierre MOREL European Union Special Representative (EUSR) for the crisis in Georgia until 28 February 2009. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 25 September 2008, the Council adopted Joint Action 2008/760/CFSP (1) appointing Mr Pierre MOREL European Union Special Representative (EUSR) for the crisis in Georgia until 28 February 2009.

| (2) | On 16 February 2009, the Council adopted Joint Action 2009/131/CFSP (2) extending the mandate of the EUSR until 31 August 2009, and on 27 July 2009, the Council adopted Joint Action 2009/571/CFSP (3) further extending the mandate of the EUSR until 28 February 2010. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 16 February 2009, the Council adopted Joint Action 2009/131/CFSP (2) extending the mandate of the EUSR until 31 August 2009, and on 27 July 2009, the Council adopted Joint Action 2009/571/CFSP (3) further extending the mandate of the EUSR until 28 February 2010.

| (3) | A new financial reference amount should be provided in order to cover the expenditure related to the mandate of the EUSR until 28 February 2010. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

A new financial reference amount should be provided in order to cover the expenditure related to the mandate of the EUSR until 28 February 2010.

| (4) | The EUSR will implement his mandate in the context of a situation which may deteriorate and could harm the objectives of the Common Foreign and Security Policy set out in Article 21 of the Treaty, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The EUSR will implement his mandate in the context of a situation which may deteriorate and could harm the objectives of the Common Foreign and Security Policy set out in Article 21 of the Treaty,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Joint Action 2009/131/CFSP is hereby amended as follows:

Article 5(1) shall be replaced by the following:

‘1.   The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to the mandate of the EUSR in the period from 1 March 2009 to 28 February 2010 shall be 517 000 EUR.’.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 15 December 2009.

For the Council

The President

E. ERLANDSSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 259, 27.9.2008, p. 16.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 46, 17.2.2009, p. 47.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 197, 29.7.2009, p. 109.

3

---
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2177 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2177

To express the sense of the Congress that the President should award a 
      Presidential unit citation to the final crew of the U.S.S. 
             INDIANAPOLIS, which was sunk on July 30, 1945.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 16, 1998

  Mr. Inouye introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To express the sense of the Congress that the President should award a 
      Presidential unit citation to the final crew of the U.S.S. 
             INDIANAPOLIS, which was sunk on July 30, 1945.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRESIDENTIAL UNIT CITATION FOR FINAL CREW OF THE U.S.S. 
              INDIANAPOLIS.

    (a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of the Congress that the 
President should award a Presidential Unit Citation to the final crew 
of the U.S.S. INDIANAPOLIS (CA-35) in recognition of the courage and 
fortitude displayed by the members of that crew in the face of 
extraordinary hardship and adversity after their ship was torpedoed and 
sunk on July 30, 1945.
    (b) Waiver of Time Limitation.--A citation described in subsection 
(a) may be made without regard to any provision of law or regulation 
prescribing a time limitation that is otherwise applicable with respect 
to recommendation for, or the award of, such a citation.
                                 <all>
```
#### Kent E. HOVIND, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 06-15229

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

July 2, 2007.

Alan S. Richey, Law Office of Alan S. Richey, Port Hadlock, WA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Carol A. Barthel, Kenneth L. Greene, Washington, DC, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before WILSON, PRYOR and COX, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Kent E. Hovind appeals the United States Tax Court’s grant of summary judgment to the Commissioner of the IRS. Hovind argues that he was erroneously prevented from challenging the amount of his tax liability in the Tax Court. He also argues that summary judgment was improper because issues of material fact exist regarding whether proper procedures were used to assess the tax and whether Hovind intended to use nominees to avoid tax payment.

After a thorough review of the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal, we conclude that the Tax Court did not err in granting summary judgment to the IRS. Hovind waived his right to contest the amount of his tax liability in court by failing to raise that issue at the appropriate time in the administrative process. And, the record does not support his contentions that issues of material fact exist as to the propriety of the procedures used by the IRS.

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                                    EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Patriot Bank Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A. Elko, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all in
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ RICHARD A. ELKO
--------------------------
Richard A. Elko
Chief Executive Officer
May 9, 2003

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Patriot Bank Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James G. Blume, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all in
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ JAMES G. BLUME
--------------------------
James G. Blume
Chief Financial Officer
May 9, 2003

                                       29
EXHIBIT 12.1
 DELL INC.
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
 Fiscal Year EndedJanuary 30,
    
    
    February 1,
    
    
    February 2,
    
    
    February 3,
    
    
    January 28,2009
    
    
    2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005(in millions, except ratio)Earnings: (a)Pre-tax income from continuing operations
    
    $
    3,324
    
    
    $
    3,827
    
    
    $
    3,345
    
    
    $
    4,608
    
    
    $
    4,403Add: fixed charges adjusted for capitalized interest
    
    
    132
    
    
    
    84
    
    
    
    71
    
    
    
    52
    
    
    
    35Add: minority interest
    
    
    -
    
    
    
    29
    
    
    
    23
    
    
    
    27
    
    
    
    17Total earnings
    
    $
    3,456
    
    
    $
    3,940
    
    
    $
    3,439
    
    
    $
    4,687
    
    
    $
    4,455Fixed Charges: (b)Interest expense
    
    $
    93
    
    
    $
    45
    
    
    $
    45
    
    
    $
    29
    
    
    $
    15Capitalized interest
    
    
    -
    
    
    
    -
    
    
    
    -
    
    
    
    -
    
    
    
    -Estimate of interest in rent expense
    
    
    39
    
    
    
    39
    
    
    
    26
    
    
    
    23
    
    
    
    20Total fixed charges
    
    $
    132
    
    
    $
    84
    
    
    $
    71
    
    
    $
    52
    
    
    $
    35Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    
    
    26
    
    
    
    47
    
    
    
    49
    
    
    
    90
    
    
    
    128
 
 (a)
    
    Earnings mean the amounts resulting from the following: (i) our pre-tax income
from continuing operations, plus (ii) our fixed charges adjusted for capitalized
interest but including amortization of capitalized interest, plus (iii) our
minority interests in the income of subsidiaries.(b)
    
    Fixed charges mean the amounts resulting from the following: (i) our interest
expensed, plus (ii) our interest capitalized, plus (iii) a reasonable estimation
of the interest factor included in rental expense.