alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

________________________________________ 

________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

March 8, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130486 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

IN RE KONSTANTINO HAWTHORNE and Robert P. Young, Jr. 

HALLIE HAWTHORNE, Minors. Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, f/k/a 

FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY, 

Petitioner-Appellant, 

v SC: 130486 

 COA: 262433

 Macomb CC

 Family Division: 03-054071-NA 

EFTHYMIA HAWTHORNE, 

Respondent-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 19, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and 

REINSTATE the Macomb Circuit Court’s order terminating respondent’s parental rights 

to her children. There was clear and convincing evidence supporting termination of 

respondent’s parental rights pursuant to MCL 712A.19b(3)(c)(i), (g), and (j). There was 

also clear and convincing evidence that termination of respondent’s parental rights was 

not contrary to the best interests of the children. MCL 712A.19b(5). 

s0301 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 8, 2006 

Clerk
[944 NYS2d 632]

#### In the Matter of Sheryl L. Robinson Wood (Admitted as Sheryl L. Robinson), an Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District, Petitioner.

Second Department,

May 23, 2012

*127APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Gary L. Casella,*White Plains *(Gloria J. Anderson*of counsel), for petitioner.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The instant application is predicated upon an order issued by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals (29 A3d 473 [2011]) following receipt of the report and recommendation of an ad hoc hearing committee of the District of Columbia Board on Professional Responsibility, issued on or about September 13, 2011, which recommended approval of a petition for negotiated attorney discipline. According to the petition for negotiated discipline, the United States District Court, Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division (hereinafter the Michigan Court), appointed the respondent, on or about July 18, 2003, as a monitor to evaluate compliance with two consent judgments involving the City of Detroit. Although the respondent’s position required her to remain neutral and independent from the parties, from in or about late 2003 through 2004, the respondent had “undisclosed and personal communications with then Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick” and, in early 2004, “intimate contact with the then Mayor.” After the Michigan Court confronted the respondent with these facts, she voluntarily resigned as monitor on July 22, 2009.

The District of Columbia Court of Appeals noted that the Michigan Court did not seek the respondent’s resignation and that, to the contrary, believed she could continue in her position as monitor. Moreover, the respondent mitigated her conduct by taking full responsibility for her actions and fully cooperating with District of Columbia Bar Counsel. Furthermore, the respondent did not have any prior disciplinary history, her conduct did not result in personal gain and neither negatively nor financially impacted the monitored cases, and no client was harmed. As a result of the respondent’s conduct, the recommendation of the ad hoc hearing committee to publicly censure the respondent was adopted.

In the absence of a verified statement from the respondent setting forth any of the three defenses to the imposition of reciprocal discipline enumerated in 22 NYCRR 691.3 (c), there is no impediment to the imposition of reciprocal discipline by this Court *(see 22*NYCRR 691.3 [b]).

*128Inasmuch as the respondent has asserted none of the enumerated defenses to the imposition of reciprocal discipline, the application of the Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District is granted and the respondent is publicly censured.

Mastro, A.P.J., Rivera, Skelos, Dillon and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the application of the Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District to impose reciprocal discipline is granted; and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.3, the respondent, Sheryl L. Robinson Wood, admitted as Sheryl L. Robinson, is publicly censured.
Exhibit 10.20

	Schedule of Executed Limited Partnership Agreements
	By and Between Coventry Corporation


Coventry Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sterling House Corporation,
has entered into the following License Agreements which vary only in the
following material respects from Exhibit 10.19.


   Limited Partnership                   Partner              Dated    

Claremont Development,              Elderly Living,          3/31/97
Limited Partnership                 Limited Partnership

Hartford Development,               Elderly Living,          6/25/97
Limited Partnership                 Limited Partnership

Gladstone Development,              Elderly Living,          6/25/97
Limited Partnership                 Limited Partnership
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Ronald Fishon, Appellant, v Robert Henderson, as Superintendent of Auburn Correctional Facility, Respondent.

— Judgment unanimously affirmed *(see, People ex rel. West v Jones,*122 AD2d 308). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Cayuga County, Contiguglia, J. — art 78.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Young Innovations (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that based on their knowledge (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.  

 

 

 

*/s/ Alfred E. Brennan, Jr.*

 

Alfred E. Brennan, Jr.

Chief Executive Officer

 

*/s/ Arthur L. Herbst, Jr.*

 

Arthur L. Herbst, Jr.

President

 

 

*/s/ Christine R. Boehning*

 

Christine R. Boehning

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6612

DAVID RABB,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

THOMAS MCBRIDE, Warden, Mount Olive Correctional Complex,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern 

District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, 

Jr., District Judge. (2:09-cv-00159)

Submitted: November 17, 2011 Decided: November 22, 2011

Before KING, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Rabb, Appellant Pro Se. Dawn Ellen Warfield, Deputy 

Attorney General, Robert David Goldberg, Assistant Attorney 

General, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

David Rabb seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

accepting in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A)

(2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record and 

conclude that Rabb has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we grant Rabb’s motion to file an amended informal 

brief, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 
3

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.1

      Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

                 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Anthony Q. Joffe, certify to the best of my knowledge based upon a review of
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of NetWorth Technologies, Inc. for the
quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the "Form 10-Q"), that the Form 10-Q fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of NetWorth Technologies, Inc. for the periods covered by the Form
10-Q.

Dated: May 22, 2006

By: /s/ Anthony Q. Joffe
    Anthony Q. Joffe, Chief Executive Officer

I, Anthony Q. Joffe, certify to the best of my knowledge based upon a review of
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of NetWorth Technologies, Inc. for the
quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the "Form 10-Q"), that the Form 10-Q fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of NetWorth Technologies, Inc. for the periods covered by the Form
10-Q.

Dated: May 22, 2006

By: /s/ Anthony Q. Joffe
    Anthony Q. Joffe, Chief Financial Officer
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Invasive Plant Research Laboratory: Fort Lauderdale, FL
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Outreach
                        Volunteer
                                    Outreach Activities 2019
                                    Outreach Activities 2020
                                    Outreach Activities 2022
                    K.I.N.D. GardenSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Fort Lauderdale, Florida Invasive Plant Research Laboratory People & Locations







Stephanie  Ripsom
                        Invasive Plant Research Laboratory

                        




                        
                        Biological Science Technician
                        Phone: (954) 475-6540
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
# C_2006003EN.01000201.xml

| 6.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 3/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 3/2

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(2006/C 3/02)

Date of adoption of the decision:

Member State: Italy

Aid No: NN 41/04

Title: Dairy farm conversion aid

Objective: To help farmers giving up cow's milk production to switch to another activity

Legal basis: Legge 30 maggio 2003, n. 119 «Conversione in legge, con modificazioni, del decreto-legge 28 marzo 2003, n. 49, recante riforma della normativa in tema di applicazione del prelievo supplementare nel settore del latte e dei prodotti lattiero-caseari.».

Decreto 26 febbraio 2004«Modalità di attuazione del regime di aiuti per la riconversione delle aziende zootecniche da latte in aziende estensive ad indirizzo carne o ad indirizzo latte non bovino di cui all'art. 10, comma 21, della legge 30 maggio 2003, n. 119.»

Schema di decreto «Criteri per l'emanazione delle linee di indirizzo relative alla presentazione dei piani di riconversione delle aziende zootecniche da latte di cui all'articolo 10 commi 20 e 21 della legge n. 119/03»

Budget: EUR 10 000 000

Aid intensity or amount: 40 % of eligible expenditure in areas other than less-favoured areas (45 % for investments carried out by young farmers within five years of setting up) and 50 % in less-favoured areas (55 % for investments carried out by young farmers within five years of setting up)

Duration: Indeterminate

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/secretariat_general/sgb/state_aids/

---
734 A.2d 1277

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant, v. John W. BURT, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Submitted Aug. 9, 1999.

Decided Sept. 8, 1999.

Robert Grossi, Franklin, for Com.

Nanette Crews, Grove City, for John W. Burt.

Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN and SAYLOR, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Based upon our disposition in *Commonwealth v. Williams,*557 Pa. 285, 733 A.2d 593 (1999), we affirm the Order of the Venango County Court of Common Pleas dated December 11, 1998. Furthermore, we remand the matter to the common pleas court for disposition of any remaining issues.

Jurisdiction is relinquished.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Livestock Bio-Systems: Clay Center, NE
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    USMARC Home
                    USMARC Research Units
                        Genetics and Animal Breeding
                                    Meat Safety & Meat Quality
                                    Nutrition, Growth and Physiology
                                    Animal Health GenomicsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Clay Center, Nebraska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center Livestock Bio-Systems Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications
- IACUC Summaries

Collaborations The Livestock Bio-Systems has a long and productive history of collaborative research involving stakeholders.  Current collaborators and projects:


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### DELANEY v. VALENTINE et al. (three cases).

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

December 8, 1896.)

Appeal—Allowing Appeal to Court op Appeals.

An appeal will be allowed to the court of appeals where the opinion affirming the judgment was unanimous only out of deference to the decision of the general term on a prior appeal.

Application by Thomas B. Valentine and others for leave to appeal to the court of appeals. Granted.

Argued before PARKER, P. J., and LANDON, HERRICK, PUTNAM, and MERWIN, JJ.

Walter P. Butler (Edgar T. Brackett, of counsel), for appellants.

W. A. Pierson (A. W. Shepherd, of counsel), for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

These cases were heard and decided by the late general term of the Third department, and the trials had and judgments rendered from which these appeals were taken were had and rendered pursuant to that decision. The decisions rendered in this court upon the appeals here were arrived at largely upon and in deference to the decisions of said general term, and for the purpose of the orderly administration of justice, except for which reason this court would not have been unanimous in its decision; so that these cases were practically decided before the enactment of the statute which makes this court the court of last resort in this class of cases. For these reasons, we think, therefore, these cases do not come within the ordinary rules applicable to applications for leave to appeal to the court of appeals; and the applications are therefore granted, and certificates ordered, pursuant to section 191 of the Code of Civil Procedure. All concur, except PUTNAM, J., not acting.
<PAGE>





                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1



                                WRITTEN STATEMENT
  OF THE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER AND THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 13350


Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned President and
Chief Operating Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Noble International
Ltd. (the "Company"), hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge the
Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


                               By: /s/ Christopher L. Morin
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                               Name: Christopher L. Morin
                               Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
                               (Principal Executive Officer) of Noble
                               International, Ltd.




                               By: /s/ Jay J. Hansen
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                               Name: Jay J. Hansen
                               Title: Chief Financial Officer (Principal
                               Financial Officer) of Noble International, Ltd.
Exhibit 32.2



Visual Networks, Inc.



Written Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Visual Networks, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, on the date hereof:



| | (c) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (d) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Donald E. Clarke                                                                   
|Donald E. Clarke Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer November 15, 2004



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Visual Networks, Inc. and will be retained by Visual Networks, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.