alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Food Animal Environmental Systems Research: Bowling Green, KY
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Models & Software
                        Sorption Isotherm Spreadsheets
                                    Annual Phosphorus Loss Estimator (APLE) Model
                                    Modified Arcsine Log Calibration Curve (ALCC)Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Bowling Green, Kentucky Food Animal Environmental Systems Research Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Collaborations The Food Animal Environmental Systems Research has a long and productive history of collaborative research involving stakeholders.  Current collaborators and projects:  Biochar Bedding Amendment and Anaerobic Digestion Mitigate Foodborne Pathogens, Antimicrobial Resistance and Ammonia in Poultry Production  Modeling Incidental and Legacy Phosphorus Losses in Western Lake Erie Basin  Institutional Biological Safety Committee (IBC) Agreement - Western Kentucky University Developing Safe, Efficient and Environmentally Sound Management Practices for the Use of Animal Manure


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
##### 



Exhibit 24.1 POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature
appears below hereby constitutes and appoints John D. Johnson and John Schmitz,
and each of them, his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, each
acting alone, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him or
her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities to sign
a Form 10-K under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, of CHS Inc. and any
and all amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and
other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone,
full power and authority to do and perform to all intents and purposes as he or
she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, or the substitutes for such
attorneys-in-fact and agents, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue
hereof. Name
    
    Title
    
    Dates/John D. Johnson

John D. Johnson
    
    Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
    
    October 6, 2004s/John Schmitz
John Schmitz
    
    Executive Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer)
    
    October 6, 2004s/Michael Toelle
Michael Toelle
    
    Chairman of the Board
    
    October 6, 2004s/Bruce Anderson
Bruce Anderson
    
    Director
    
    October 6, 2004s/Robert A. Bass

Robert Bass
    
    Director
    
    October 6, 2004s/David J. Bielenberg

David Bielenberg
    
    Director
    
    October 6, 2004s/Dennis Carlson
Dennis Carlson
    
    Director
    
    October 6, 2004s/Curt Eischens
Curt Eischens
    
    Director
    
    October 6, 2004s/Robert Elliott
Robert Elliott
    
    Director
    
    October 6, 2004s/Steve Fritel
Steve Fritel
    
    Director
    
    October 6, 2004




---



##### 



s/Robert Grabarski
Robert Grabarski
    
    Director
    
    October 6, 2004s/Jerry Hasnedl
Jerry Hasnedl
    
    Director
    
    October 6, 2004s/Glen L. Keppy

Glen Keppy
    
    Director
    
    October 6, 2004s/James Kile
    
    Director
    
    October 6, 2004James Kiles/Randy Knecht
Randy Knecht
    
    Director
    
    October 6, 2004s/Michael J. Mulcahey

Michael Mulcahey
    
    Director
    
    October 6, 2004s/Richard G. Owen

Richard Owen
    
    Director
    
    October 6, 2004s/Duane Stenzel
Duane Stenzel
    
    Director
    
    October 6, 2004s/Merlin Van Walleghen
Merlin Van Walleghen
    
    Director
    
    October 6, 2004
 2
#### VICTOR RIVERA, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. IRA GRILL, *ET AL.,*DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS.

See same case below: 65 *N. J. Super. 253.*

*Messrs. Levy, Lemleen & Margulies*and *Mr. Ezra L. Nolan*for the petitioners.

*Messrs. Florio, Dunn, Marciano & Lypinslei*for the respondent.

April 17, 1961.

Denied.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JOHN MARZAK, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

*Messrs. Marinello, Cundari & Soriano, Mr. Leon S. Wollc*and *Mr. Allen J. Simonson*for the petitioner.

*Mr. Brendan T. Byrne, Mr. Q. William Caruso*and *Mr. Maurice J. McEeown*for the respondent.

April 17, 1961.

Denied.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Harry K. Dupree Stuttgart National Aquaculture Research Cntr: Stuttgart, AR
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Stuttgart, Arkansas Harry K. Dupree Stuttgart National Aquaculture Research Cntr Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications
- IACUC Summary

Collaborations The Harry K. Dupree Stuttgart National Aquaculture Research Cntr has a long and productive history of collaborative research involving stakeholders.  Current collaborators and projects:  Water Quality Improvement and Pathogen Reduction by Peracetic Acid (PAA) in Trout Culture  USDA/ARS/HKDSNARC and UAPB Aquaculture and Fisheries Department Cooperative Aquaculture Research, Technology Transfer, and Stakeholder Engagement Sunshine Bass Triploid Research Enhancing Sustainable Production of Hybrid Striped Bass and White Bass Through Use of Novel Plant and Insect Feed Ingredients Development of Freshwater Aquaponics for Plant (Herbs, Vegetables, and Flowers) and High-Value Fish Production


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT



To the Partners
T. Rowe Price Realty Income Fund IV,
America's Sales-Commission-Free Real Estate Limited
Partnership:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration
statement (No. 33-45405) on Form S-3 of T. Rowe Price Realty
Income Fund IV, America's Sales-Commission-Free Real Estate
Limited Partnership of our report dated January 27, 1997,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of T. Rowe Price
Realty Income Fund IV, America's Sales-Commission-Free Real
Estate Limited Partnership and its consolidated ventures as
of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, partners' capital, and cash flows
and related schedule for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 1996, which report appears in the
December 31, 1996 Annual Report on Form 10-K of T. Rowe Price
Realty Income Fund IV, America's Sales-Commission-Free Real
Estate Limited Partnership and to the reference to our firm
under the heading "Experts" in the prospectus, which is a
part of the registration statement.





Chicago, Illinois
March 26, 1997
STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 83 I 464

THENELL LAW GROUP, P.C.

12909 SW 68th Parkway, Suite 290

Portland, Oregon 97223

Telephone (503) 372-6450

Facsimile (503) 372-6496

Daniel E. Thenell, OSB No. 971655

dan@thenelllawgroup.com

Chelsea P. Pyasetskyy, OSB No. 136450

chelsea@thenelllawgroup.com

Thenell Law Group, P.C. 

12909 SW 68th Parkway, Suite 290

Portland, Oregon 97223

503-372-6450 phone

503-372-6496 fax

Of Attorneys for Defendant Country Mutual Insurance Company

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

MEDFORD DIVISION

CARLO VERITAS,

Plaintiff,

vs.

COUNTRY MUTUAL INSURANCE 

COMPANY,

Defendant.

Case No. 1:15-cv-01623-CL 

STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER 

FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Pursuant to Fed R Civ P 41, the parties to this action hereby stipulate to the dismissal of all 

/ / / 

/ / /

/ / /

Case 1:15-cv-01623-CL Document 53 Filed 12/08/17 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 83 I 464

THENELL LAW GROUP, P.C.

12909 SW 68th Parkway, Suite 290

Portland, Oregon 97223

Telephone (503) 372-6450

Facsimile (503) 372-6496

claims and counterclaims with prejudice and without an award of attorney fees, costs, or 

disbursements to any party.

IT IS SO STIPULATED: 

DATED: December 8, 2017 

TAYLOR & TAPPER 

By: /s/ Clinton Tapper

Clinton Tapper 

clinton@taylortapper.com

R. Scott Taylor

scott@taylortapper.com;

Of Attorneys for Plaintiff

DATED: December 8, 2017 

THENELL LAW GROUP, P.C. 

By: /s/ Daniel E. Thenell

Daniel E. Thenell, OSB #971655 

Email: dan@thenelllawgroup.com

Of Attorneys for Defendant County 

Mutual Insurance Company

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION

This matter having come before the court on the Stipulation of Plaintiff Carlo Veritas and 

Defendant Country Mutual Insurance Company, therefore, it is hereby

ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that all claims by Plaintiff Carlo Veritas 

against Defendant are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without attorney fees and costs to either 

party. 

DATED: _______________________, 2017

_______________________________________

United State District Judge

Case 1:15-cv-01623-CL Document 53 Filed 12/08/17 Page 2 of 2
#### EX PARTE POWELL.

(Decided April 10, 1913.)

Certiorari to Court of Appeals.

W. L. Parks, E. R. Brannen, and Foster, Samford & Carroll, for petitioner.

R. C. Brickell, Attorney General for tbe State.

McClellan, J.

— Writ denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>             5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                         258,810
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  129,217
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    782,223
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,188,634
<PP&E>                                         217,723
<DEPRECIATION>                                 104,460
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,392,723
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          388,630
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,411
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,126,735
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,392,723
<SALES>                                        225,259
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               225,259
<CGS>                                          118,625
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  118,625
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               416,145
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             (309,511)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              65,003
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (363,975)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (363,975)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (393,975)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (363,975)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.22)
        



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amendment to the annual report of 110 Media Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 12, 2006 (the "Report"), I,
William A. Mobley, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ William A. Mobley, Jr.
--------------------------
William A. Mobley, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer
May 12, 2006

A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Jeremiah Navarro v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-20-00308-CR

Trial court case number: CR2014-389

Trial court: 207th District Court of Comal County

Appellant’s brief was originally due on August 14, 2020. On March 18, 2021, after granting 

multiple prior extension requests by appellant, the Court granted an extension to April 19, 2021, 

with no further extensions. On April 20, 2021, appellant filed another motion requesting an 

additional 30-day extension. Although appellant has not filed a brief by the date requested in the 

extension motion, we grant one final extension to September 1, 2021. Unless an appellant’s brief 

is filed by September 1, 2021, this case will be abated and remanded to the trial court for a hearing 

pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(b). See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Gordon Goodman________

Acting individually 

Date: ____August 12, 2021_____
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kerry Coleman, Appellant.

[945 NYS2d 915]

— Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Richard A. Keenan, J.), rendered December 3, 2009. The judgment revoked defendant’s sentence of probation and imposed a sentence of incarceration.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment revoking the sentence of probation previously imposed upon his conviction of criminal contempt in the first degree (Penal Law § 215.51 [c]) and sentencing him to a term of incarceration. Contrary to defendant’s contention, the People established by the requisite preponderance of the evidence at the violation hearing that he committed acts that constitute harassment in the second degree and thus committed an additional offense in violation of the terms and conditions of his probation *(see*CPL 410.10 [2]; 410.70 [1], [3]; *People v Bergman,*56 AD3d 1225 [2008], *lv denied*12 NY3d 756 [2009]; *People v Schneider,*188 AD2d 754, 755-756 [1992], *lv denied*81 NY2d 892 [1993]).

We reject defendant’s further contention that he was denied effective assistance of counsel based on an alleged conflict of interest with defense counsel at the violation hearing. Defendant failed to “show that ‘the conduct of his defense was in fact affected by the operation of the conflict of interest,’ or that the conflict ‘operated on’ the representation” *(People v Ortiz,*76 NY2d 652, 657 [1990]; *see People v Konstantinides,*14 NY3d 1, 10 [2009]). Present — Smith, J.E, Fahey, Garni, Sconiers and Martoche, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF REGENT ASSISTED LIVING, INC. AS OF
JUNE 30, 1999, AND THE RELATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS IN
THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       3,573,111
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  658,558
<ALLOWANCES>                                    37,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,075,003
<PP&E>                                      53,588,211
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,936,041
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              63,577,310
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,799,996
<BONDS>                                     49,199,695
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       10,808,703
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,349,841
<OTHER-SE>                                (19,909,106)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                63,577,310
<SALES>                                     24,790,553
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            24,960,159
<CGS>                                       18,052,262
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               28,105,722
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,083,328
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,705,687)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,705,687)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,705,687)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.86)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.86)


</TABLE>
The Honorable Charles R. Wolle, Chief Judge, United States

1

District Court for the Southern District of Iowa.

___________

No. 95-3586

___________

United States of America, *

 *

Appellee, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * Southern District of Iowa.

David Henry Ritcherson, *

 * [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: May 31, 1996

 Filed: June 3, 1996

___________

Before McMILLIAN, WOLLMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

A jury found David Henry Ritcherson guilty of a drug offense, and we

affirmed his conviction and sentence. United States v. Watts, 950 F.2d 508

(8th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 911, 943, 945 (1992). Ritcherson

then filed this 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion alleging prior "forfeitures" of

United States currency constituted former jeopardy barring his drug

conviction. The district court denied Ritcherson's motion, and Ritcherson 1

appeals.

After de novo review of the record, we conclude Ritcherson's claim

is meritless. First, there is no evidence showing that any forfeiture

proceeding occurred, or that Ritcherson contested the alleged forfeiture

proceedings. Second, even assuming the currency
-2-

was forfeited, Ritcherson's claim is foreclosed by United States v.

$21,282.00 in U.S. Currency, 47 F.3d 972, 973 (8th Cir. 1995) ("[t]he

forfeiture of proceeds of criminal activity which `simply parts the owner

from the fruits of the criminal activity' does not constitute punishment"

(quoted case omitted)), and by United States v. Clementi, 70 F.3d 997, 999-

1000 (8th Cir. 1995) (rejecting analysis in United States v. $405,089.23

U.S. Currency, 33 F.3d 1210 (9th Cir. 1994), amended on denial of reh'g,

56 F.3d 41 (9th Cir. 1995), cert. granted, 116 S. Ct. 762 (1996), and

extending reasoning in $21,282.00 in U.S. Currency to double jeopardy

analysis).

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.