Philip A. Rush, OSB No. 893526

prush@ martinbi shoff. com

Michael J. Farrell, OSB No. 902587

m farre I I @martinbi scho ff. com

Alice S. Newlin, OSB No. 084314

anewl i nlômartinb i scho ff. c o m

MARTIN BISCHOFF TEMPLETON LANGSLET & HOFFMAN LLP

888 SV/ Fifth Avenue, Suite 900

Portland, OR97204

Telephone: (503) 224-3 I 13

Facsimile: (503) 224-947 |

Attorneys for Counterclaim-Defendant Federal

Home Loan Mortgage Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON

Portland Division

COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH,

Plaintifl

V,

MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION

SYSTEMS,INC., a Delaware corporation, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 3 : I 5-cv-01 246-PK

COUNTERCLAIM-DEFENDANT

FEDERAL HOME LOAN

MORTGAGE CORPORATION' S

ANSV/ER AND AFFIRMATIVE

DEFENSES TO COLINTERCLAIMS

MARTIN, BISCHOFF, TEMPLETON ' u¡rcslÉr a ¡roÈrrr¡eñ up

Altorneys at Law

888 SW Fifth Avênuo, Suite 900

Portland, OR 97204

Telephone (503) 224-3113

Fax (sogt 224-947 1

MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION

SYSTEMS,INC.,

Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintif f,

COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH,

Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant,

and

Page I - COUNTERCLAIM-DEFENDANT FEDERAL HOME LOAN

MORTGAGE CORPORATION'S ANSWER TO COLTNTERCLAIMS

V

Case 3:15-cv-01246-PK Document 180 Filed 07/23/15 Page 1 of 13
HOME LOAN MORTGAGE

CORPORATION, and FEDERAL NATIONAL

MORTGAGE ASSOCIATIONO

Countercl aim-De fendants

In response to the counterclaims alleged in Counterclaim Plaintiff Mortgage Electronic

Registration Systems, Inc.'s ("MERS") Answer and Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims

("the Counterclaims"), Counterclaim Defendant Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation

("Freddie Mac") admits, denies, and affirmatively alleges as follows.

l. Freddie Mac admits the allegations in Paragraph I of the Counterclaims.

2. Freddie Mac admits the allegations in Paragraph 2 of the Counterclaims.

3. Freddie Mac admits the allegations in Paragraph 3 of the Counterclaims.

4. Paragraph 4 states conclusions of law, and therefore, no response from Freddie

Mac is necessary. To the extent that a response is required, Freddie Mac admits the allegations

in the first sentence of Paragraph 4 of the Counterclaims. Freddie Mac further admits that, to the

extent that plaintiff Multnomah County in its Third Amended Complaint seeks to invalidate

recorded Freddie Mac deeds of trust and/or deprive Freddie Mac of the priority of its lien,

Freddie Mac has an interest that would be affected by the counterclaims.

5. Paragraph 5 states conclusions of law, and therefore, no response from Freddie

Mac is necessary. To the extent that a response is required, Freddie Mac admits the allegations

in the first sentence of Paragraph 5 of the Counterclaims. Freddie Mac further admits that, to the

extent that the Third Amended Complaint seeks to invalidate recorded Fannie Mae deeds of trust

and/or deprive Fannie Mae of the priority of its lien, Fannie Mae has an interest that would be

affected by the counterclaims.

Page2 - COUNTERCLAIM-DEFENDANT FEDERAL HOME LOAN

MORTGAGE CORPORATION'S ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIMS

MARTIN, BISCHOFF, TÊMPLETON ' ¡-nNosLÉr a Horr¡¡nñ rlp

Attorneys at Law

888 SW Fifth Avenuê, Suitê

Portland, OR

Têl€phone (503)

Fax (5031 224-9471

900

97204

224-3113

Case 3:15-cv-01246-PK Document 180 Filed 07/23/15 Page 2 of 13
6. Freddie Mac admits the allegations in Paragraph 6 of the Counterclaims.

7. Paragraph 7 states conclusions oflaw and, therefore, no response from Freddie

Mac is necessary. To the extent that a response is required, Freddie Mac admits the allegations

inParagraphT.

L Paragraph I states conclusions oflaw and, therefore, no response from Freddie

Mac is necessary. To the extent that aresponse is required, Freddie Mac admits the allegations

in Paragraph 8.

9. Paragraph 9 states conclusions oflaw and, therefore, no response from Freddie

Mac is necessary. To the extent that a response is required, Freddie Mac admits the allegations

in Paragraph 9.

10. Paragraph 10 states conclusions oflaw and, therefore, no response from Freddie

Mac is necessary. To the extent that a response is required, Freddie Mac admits the allegations

in Paragraph 10.

I 1. Paragraph I I states conclusions oflaw and, therefore, no response from Freddie

Mac is necessary. To the extent that a response is required, Freddie Mac admits the allegations

in Paragraph I 1.

12. Freddie Mac admits the allegations in Paragraph 12 of the Counterclaims.

13. Paragraph 13 states conclusions oflaw and, therefore, no response from Freddie

Mac is necessary. To the extent that a response is required, Freddie Mac refers to the Governing

Documents for the contents thereof.

14. Paragraph 14 states conclusions oflaw and, therefore, no response from Freddie

Mac is necessary. To the extent that a response is required, Freddie Mac admits that MERS is

Page 3 - COUNTERCLAIM-DEFENDANT FEDERAL HOME LOAN

MORTGAGE CORPORATION'S ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIMS

MARTIN, BISCHOFF, TEMPLETON ' unñeslÉr a ¡ropÈueñ llp

Atlornsys al Law

888 SW Fifth Avenuo, Su¡te 900

Portland, OR 97204

Telephone (503) 224-31 1 3

Fax (503) 224-9471

Case 3:15-cv-01246-PK Document 180 Filed 07/23/15 Page 3 of 13
permitted to serve as the nominee on a deed of trust for the Lender and for any successors and

assigns of the Lender, who are also members of the MERS@ System.

15. Freddie Mac admits the allegations in Paragraph l5 of the Counterclaims.

COUNT I

Declaratory Relief

16. Paragraph 16 incorporates the allegations ofthe previous paragraphs I through 15

and no additional response is required. To the extent a response is required, Freddie Mac

incorporates its previous answers to paragraphs I through 15 above, as if fully set forth herein.

17. Freddie Mac lacks sufficient information and belief to admit or deny the

allegations in Paragraph l7 of the Counterclaims.

18. Freddie Mac lacks suffrcient information and belief to admit or deny the

allegations in Paragraph 18 of the Counterclaims.

19. Freddie Mac refers to the Freddie Mac Trust Deed attached to the Counterclaims

as Exhibit 1 for the contents thereof. Freddie Mac further admits that it currently holds the

Freddie Mac note, which is secured by the Freddie Mac Trust Deed recorded on February 10,

2014.

20. Freddie Mac admits the allegations in Paragraph 20 of the Counterclaims.

2I. Freddie Mac refers to the Freddie Mac Trust Deed for the contents thereof.

22. Freddie Mac admits that the Freddie Mac Trust Deed was presented and accepted

for recording, and that presumably the County determined that all of the legal requirements for

recording a trust deed were met.

Page 4 - COUNTERCLAIM-DEFENDANT FEDERAL HOME LOAN

MORTGAGE CORPORATION'S ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIMS

MARTIN, BISCHOFF

LLP

900

97204

BBb

Fax

&

224-3113

Case 3:15-cv-01246-PK Document 180 Filed 07/23/15 Page 4 of 13
23, Freddie Mac refers to the Third Amended Complaint for the allegations contained

therein and, therefore, no response from Freddie Mac is necessary. To the extent that a response

is required, Freddie Mac admits the County has made the allegations set forth in paragraph23,

but denies such allegations in their entirety to the extent such allegations attempt to invalidate in

any manner the perfected security interest of the Freddie Mac Trust Deed and Note.

24. Freddie Mac refers to the Third Amended Complaint for the allegations contained

therein and, therefore, no response from Freddie Mac is necessary. To the extent that a response

is required, Freddie Mac admits the County has made the allegations set forth in paragraph24,

but denies such allegations in their entirety to the extent such allegations attempt to invalidate in

any manner the perfected security interest of the Freddie Mac Trust Deed and Note.

25. Freddie Mac refers to the Third Amended Complaint for the allegations contained

therein and, therefore, no response from Freddie Mac is necessary. To the extent that a response

is required, Freddie Mac admits the County has made the allegations set forth in paragraph25,

but denies such allegations in their entirety to the extent such allegations attempt to invalidate in

any manner the perfected security interest of the Freddie Mac Trust Deed and Note.

26. Freddie Mac refers to the Third Amended Complaint for the allegations contained

therein and, therefore, no response from Freddie Mac is necessary. To the extent that a response

is required, Freddie Mac admits the County has made the allegations set forth in paragraph26,

but denies such allegations in their entirety to the extent such allegations attempt to invalidate in

any manner the perfected security interest of the Freddie Mac Trust Deed and Note.

27. Paragraph 27 states conclusions oflaw and, therefore, no response from Freddie

Mac is necessary. To the extent that aresponse is required, Freddie Mac refers to the decision in

Page 5 - COUNTERCLAIM-DEFENDANT FEDERAL HOME LOAN

MORTGAGE CORPORATION'S ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIMS

MARTIN, BISCHOFF, TEMPLEION ' LnrlCSr-er a ¡rOrrrr¿nÑ llP

Attornsys at Law

888 SW F¡fth Avenue, Su¡le 900

Portland, OR 97204

Telephone (503) 224-31 1 3

Fax (5O3\ 224-947'l

Case 3:15-cv-01246-PK Document 180 Filed 07/23/15 Page 5 of 13
Niday for the holding thereof. Freddie Mac further admits that it is not counter to public policy

or Oregon law for MERS to be designated as the beneficiary on a trust deed as the nominee for

the lender and its successors and assigns

28. Paragraph 28 states a conclusion of law and, therefore, no response from Freddie

Mac is necessary. To the extent that aresponse is required, Freddie Mac refers to the decisions

in Brandrup and Niday for the contents thereof.

29. Freddie Mac refers to the Third Amended Complaint for the allegations contained

therein and, therefore, no response from Freddie Mac is necessary. To the extent that a response

is required, Freddie Mac admits the County has made the allegations set forth in parugraph29,

but denies such allegations in their entirety to the extent such allegations attempt to invalidate in

any manner the perfected security interest of the Freddie Mac Trust Deed and Note.

30. Freddie Mac admits the allegations in Paragraph 30.

31. Freddie Mac admits the allegations in Paragraph 31.

32. Paragraph 32 states conclusions of law and, therefore, no response from Freddie

Mac is necessary. To the extent that a response is required, Freddie Mac admits that MERS is

seeking Such relief.

COUNT II

Declaratory Relief

33. Paragraph 33 incorporates the allegations of the previous paragraphs and no

additional response is required. To the extent a response is required, Freddie Mac incorporates its

previous answers, as if fully set forth herein.

MARTIN, ' BISCHOFF, TEMPLETON uuoslÉr a HorrMnñ up

Attorneys at Law

SW Fifth Avenue, Suite

Porlland, OR

Telêphonê (503)

Fax (5o3) 224-947 1

900

97204

Page 6 - COLTNTERCLAIM-DEFENDANT FEDERAL HOME LOAN

MORTGAGE CORPORATION'S ANSWER TO COLI'NTERCLAIMS 888

224-31't3

Case 3:15-cv-01246-PK Document 180 Filed 07/23/15 Page 6 of 13
34. The allegations of paragraph 34 are directed against a counterclaim defendant

other than Freddie Mac and, therefore, no response is required. To the extent a response is

required, Freddie Mac lacks sufficient information and belief to admit or deny the allegations of

Paragraph 34 and, therefore, denies the same.

35. The allegations ofparagraph 35 are directed against a counterclaim defendant

other than Freddie Mac and, therefore, no response is required. To the extent a response is

required, Freddie Mac lacks sufficient information and belief to admit or deny the allegations of

Paragraph 35 and, therefore, denies the same.

36. The allegations of paragraph 36 are directed against a counterclaim defendant

other than Freddie Mac and, therefore, no response is required. To the extent a tesponse is

required, Freddie Mac lacks sufficient information and belief to admit or deny the allegations of

Paragraph 36 and, therefore, denies the same.

37. The allegations of paragraph 37 are directed against a counterclaim defendant

other than Freddie Mac and, therefore, no response is required.

38. The allegations ofparagraph 38 are directed against a counterclaim defendant

other than Freddie Mac and, therefore, no response is required. To the extent a response is

required, Freddie Mac refers to Exhibit B to the Counterclaims for the contents thereof.

39. The allegations of paragraph 39 are directed against a counterclaim defendant

other than Freddie Mac and, therefore, no response is required. To the extent a response is

required, Freddie Mac refers to Exhibit B to the Counterclaims for the contents thereof.

PageT - COLINTERCLAIM-DEFENDANT FEDERAL HOME LOAN

MORTGAGE CORPORATION'S ANSV/ER TO COLTNTERCLAIMS

MARTIN, BISCHOFF, TEMPLETON, ' urucslÉr a Horrureñ llp

Attorneys at Law

E88 SW Fiflh Avenue, Su¡te 900

Portlånd, OR 97204

Telephone (503) 224-3113

Fax (503\ 224-9471

Case 3:15-cv-01246-PK Document 180 Filed 07/23/15 Page 7 of 13
40. The allegations of paragraph 40 are directed against a counterclaim defendant

other than Freddie Mac and, therefore, no response is required. To the extent a response is

required, Freddie Mac refers to Exhibit B to the Counterclaims for the contents thereof.

4L The allegations ofparagraph 4l are directed against a counterclaim defendant

other than Freddie Mac and, therefore, no response is required. To the extent a response is

required, Freddie Mac lacks sufficient information and belief to admit or deny the allegations of

Paragraph 4l and, therefore, denies the same.

42. The allegations of paragraph 42 are directed against a counterclaim defendant

other than Freddie Mac and, therefore, no response is required. To the extent a response is

required, Freddie Mac refers to the Third Amended Complaint for the contents thereof.

43. The allegations of paragraph 43 are directed against a counterclaim defendant

other than Freddie Mac and, therefore, no response is required. To the extent a response is

required, Freddie Mac refers to the Third Amended Complaint for the contents thereof.

44. The allegations of paragraph 44 are directed against a counterclaim defendant

other than Freddie Mac and, therefore, no response is required. To the extent a iesponse is

required, Freddie Mac refers to the Third Amended Complaint for the contents thereof.

45. The allegations of paragraph 45 are directed against a counterclaim defendant

other than Freddie Mac and, therefore, no response is required. To the extent a response is

required, Freddie Mac admits that it is not counter to public policy or Oregon law for MERS to

be designated as the beneficiary on a trust deed as the nominee for the lender and its successors

and assigns.

Page 8 - COUNTERCLAIM-DEFENDANT FEDERAL HOME LOAN

MORTGAGE CORPORATION'S ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIMS

MARTIN, BISCHOFF, TEMPLETON ' r-nñosr-rr a ¡rorÈrr¡¡ñ lr-p

Attorneys at Law

888 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 900

Portland, OR 97204

Tslephono (503) 224-31 13

Fax (503], 224-9471

Case 3:15-cv-01246-PK Document 180 Filed 07/23/15 Page 8 of 13
46. The allegations of paragraph 46 are directed against a counterclaim defendant

other than Freddie Mac and, therefore, no response is required To the extent that a response is

required, Freddie Mac refers to the decisions In Brandrup and Niday for the contents thereof.

47. The allegations of paragraph 47 are directed against a third-party defendant other

than Freddie Mac and, therefore, no response is required. To the extent a response is required,

Freddie Mac refers to the Third Amended Complaint for the contents thereof.

48. The allegations ofparagraph 48 are directed against a counterclaim defendant

other than Freddie Mac and, therefore, no response is required.

49. The allegations of paragraph 49 are directed against a counterclaim defendant

other than Freddie Mac and, therefore, no response is required.

50. The allegations of paragraph 50 are directed against a counterclaim defendant

other than Freddie Mac and, therefore, no response is required.

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

For its affirmative defenses, Freddie Mac states as follows:

FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

(Affirmative Defenses Reserved)

5l. Freddie Mac alleges that at this time it has insufficient knowledge or information

on which form a belief as to whether it may have additional, as yet unstated, affirmative defenses

available. Freddie Mac, therefore, reserves the right to assert additional affirmative defenses in

the event that discovery indicates they would be appropriate.

MARTIN, BISCHOFF, TEMPLETON ' Lar{csLÉr s Horr¡¡¡ñ llp

Attorneys al Law

SW Fifth Avenuê. Suile

Portland, OR

Tslephone (503)

Fax l5O3) 224-947'l

Page 9 - COLTNTERCLAIM-DEFENDANT FEDERAL HOME LOAN

MORTGAGE CORPORATION'S ANSWER TO COLINTERCLAIMS 888 900

97204

224-3113

Case 3:15-cv-01246-PK Document 180 Filed 07/23/15 Page 9 of 13
V/HEREFORE, Freddie Mac prays for a judgment from this Court:

1. That protects Freddie Mac's rights and interests under its Trust Deed and Note,

finding that the Freddie Mac Trust Deed is a valid lien.

2. That protects Freddie Mac's rights and interests under its Trust Deed and Note,

finding that, Freddie Mac, as the current holder of the Freddie Mac Note, is entitled to the

priority of the lien that was obtained when the Freddie Mac Trust Deed was recorded on

February 10,2014.

3. For such relief as this Court deems appropriate; and,

4. Awarding Freddie Mac its costs and disbursements, and its reasonable attorney's

fees, to the extent allowed by law, and expenses incurred in defending this action.

DATED: July 23,2015.

MARTIN, BISCHOFF, TEMPLETON,

LANGSLET & HOFFMAN, LLP

By: s/ Philip A. Rush

Philip A. Rush, OSB #893526

Email : prush@martinbischoff. com

Michael J. Farrell, OSB #902587

Email: mfanell@martinbischoff.com

Alice S. Newlin, OSB #084314

Email : anewlin@martinbischoff.com

Tel: (503) 224-3113

Fax: (503) 224-9471

Mark S. Landman, ødmitted pro hac vice

Email: mlandman@lcbf.com

Landman Corsi Ballaine & Ford, PC

120 Broadway

New York, NY 10271

Tel: (2r2) 238-4880

Attorneys for Counterclaim-Defendant Federal Home

Loan Mort gage Corporation

Page l0 - COUNTERCLAIM-DEFENDANT FEDERAL HOME LOAN

MORTGAGE CORPORATION' S ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIMS

MARTIN, BISCHOFF, TEMPLETON

LANGSLET & Hopru¡ñ rrp

Attornêys at Law

888 SW Fifih Avanue, Su¡te 900

Portlånd, OR 97204

T€lephone (503) 224-31 13

Fax(503) 224-9471

Case 3:15-cv-01246-PK Document 180 Filed 07/23/15 Page 10 of 13
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certifu that on July 23,2015,1served a copy of the foregoing COUNTERCLAIMDEFENDANT FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION'S ANSWER AND

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO COUNTERCLAIMS on the attorneys for the parties listed below by

causing a true copy thereof to be sent to each attorney's last known e-mail address as specified below;

MARTIN, BISCHOFF, TEMPLETON,

LANGSLET & HOFFMAN LLP

Attornêys at Law

888 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite

Porlland, OR

. Têlephone (503)

Fax (503\ 224-947 1

Gregory A, Chaimov

Davis Wright Tremain LLP

1300 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 2400

Portland, OR 97201-56 I 0

Email : gregorychaimov@dwt.com

Anorneys for Defendants Mortgage Electronic

Registration Systems, Inc. ; MERSCOfuP

Holdings, Inc.; JP Morgan Chase Bank and

lltMC Mortgage LLC, as successor in interest to

ll'MC Mortgage Corp.

Thomas D'Amore

Nicholas A. Kahl

D'Amore Law Group

4230 Galewood St., Suite 200

Lake Oswego, OR 97025

Email : tom@damorelaw.com: nkahl@damorelaw.com

Of Attorneys for P laintiff

Pilar C. French

Brian T. Kiolbasa

Robert E. Maloney, Jr.

Lane Powell PC

601 SW Second Ave., Suite 2100

Portland, OR 97204-3 158

Email : frenchp@lanepgwell.com;

kiolbasab@ lanepowel l.com :

malone)¡r@ lanepowel Lcom

Attorneys for Bank of America, NA, dba Banc of

America Investment Services, Inc.; Everbank

Mortgage Company, and WeIIs Fargo Bank N.A.

Russell D. Garrett

Leta E. Gorman

Jordan Ramis

2 Centerpointe Dr., 6th Fl.

Lake Oswego, OR 97035

Emai I : russ. garrett@jordanramis.com;

leta. gorman@j oldanrami s.com

Attorneys for CitiMortgage, Inc.

Erich M. Paetsch

Saalfeld Griggs PC

250 Church Street SE, Suite 300

PO Box 470

Salem, OR 97308

Emai I : epaetsch@sglaw.com

Attorneys for Columbia State Bank, successor in

interest by merger to llest Coast Bank, and

Citizens Bank

Joseph F. Savage Jr., admitted pro høc vice

Yvonne W. Chan, admitted pro hac vice

Goodwin Procter LLP

53 State Street

Boston, }l4.A02109-2802

Email: isavage@goodwinproctor.com;

ychan@ goodwinproctor.com

Of Attorneysfor Defendants Bank of America, N.A.

and l'[lells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Fred Burnside

Davis Wright Tremaine

1201 Third Ave., Suite 2200

Seattle, WA 98101-3045

Email : fredburnside@dwt.com

Of Attorneysfor Defendønts MERS and

MERSCORP Holdinss, Inc.

Brent L. Crumpton, admitted pro hac vice

3755 Village Ln.

Birmingham, AL35233

Email : blc@crurnpton law.com

Of Auorneys for P I aintiff

Page I - CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

900

97204

224-3113

Case 3:15-cv-01246-PK Document 180 Filed 07/23/15 Page 11 of 13
Robert M, Brochin, admitted pro hac vice

Clay M. Carlton, admitted pro hac vice

David W. Marston, Jr., admitted pro hac vice

Morgan Lewis & Beckius LLP

200 S Biscayne Blvd. Suite 5300

Miami, FL 33131-2310

Email : rbrochin@morganlewis.com;

ccarlton@morgan lewis.com ;

dmarston@morgan lewis.com

Of Anorneysfor Defendants MERS and

MERSCORP Holdings, Inc.

Thomas V. Panoff, admitted pro hac vice

Lucia Nalg admified pro hac vice

Christopher S. Comstock, admitted pro hac vice

Thomas P. Evans, admitted pro hac vice

Mayer Brown LLP

7l South Wacker Dr.

Chicago,IL 60606

Emai I : tpanoff@mayerbrown.com ;

lnale@mayerbrown.com ;

ccomstock@mayerbrown.com ;

tevans@mayerbrown.com

Of Attorneysfor Defendant CitiMortgage, Inc.

Gregory J. Marshall, admitted pro hac vice

Snell & Wilmer

400 E, Van Buren St., Suite 1900

Phoenix AZ 85004-2202

Email : gmarshall@swlaw.com

Of Attorneysfor Defendant SunTrust Mortgage,

Inc.

Matthew P. Previn, admitted pro hac vice

Buckley Sandler LLP

1133 Avenue of the Americas Suite 3100

New York, NY 10036

Email : mprevin@buckleysandler.com

Of Attorneys for JP Morgan Chase Bank and llMC

Mortgage LLC, qs successor in interest to ILMC

Mortgage Corp.

Andrew R. Louis

Buckley Sandler LLP

1250 24rh St. NW, Suite 700

Washington DC20037

Email : alouis@buckleysandler.com

Of Attorneysfor JP Morgan Chase Bank and

llMC Mortgage LLC, as successor in interest to

WMC Mortgage Corp.

Shawn J. Larsen-Bright

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 6100

Seattle, WA 98104-7043

Email: Larsen.bright.shawn@dorsey.com;

sterner.nelson.amy@dorsey.com;

carter.peter@dorse)¡. com

Of Attorneysfor Defendant U.S. Bank National

Association, in its individual capacity

B. John Casey

K&L Gates LLP

One SW Columbia St., Suite 1900

Portland, OR 97258

Email: iohn com

Of Attorneysfor Defendant SunTrust Mortgage,

Inc.

Henry F. Reichner, admitted pro hac vice

Reed Smith LLP

Three Logan Square Suite 3100

l7l7 Arch St.

Philadelphia PA 19103

Email : hreichner@reedsmith.com

Of Attorneysfor Defendant U,S. Bank, N.A. in its

capacity qs trustee of any specific residential

mort gage -backed securitizat ion trusts at issue

MARTIN, BISCHOFF, TEMPLETON u¡¡osr-Ér a r¡orrrr¿nñ r-r-p

Attomeys al Law

888 SW Fifth Avenue. Suite 900

Portland, OR 97204

Telsphone (503) 224-31

Fax l5O3\ 224-947 1

Page2 - CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

13

Case 3:15-cv-01246-PK Document 180 Filed 07/23/15 Page 12 of 13
William L. Larkins, Jr.

Larkins Vacura LLP

121 SW Morrison St., Suite 700

Portland, OR 97205

Email : wlarkins@larkinsvacura.com

Of Attorneysfor Defendant U.S. Bank, N.A. in its

capacity as trustee of any specific residential

mortgage -bac ked s ecuritizøtion trusts at issue

CraigL. Lowell, ødmitted pro hac vice

V/iggins, Childs, Quinn & Pantazis LLC

301 lgth sr. N.

Birmingham, AL35203

Email : clowell@wcqp.com

Of A t t orn ey s for P I aint iff

Joseph F. Yenouskas, admitted pro hac vice

Thomas M. Hefferon, admitted pro hac vice

Goodwin Proctor LLP

901 New York Avenue NW

Washington DC 20001 -4432

Emai I : jyenouskas@ gpodrryin proctor..com :

thefferon@ goodwinprocter. co{n

Of Attorneysfor Defendants Bank of America,

N.A. and l(ells Fargo Bank N.A,

Amy F. Sorenson, admitted pro hac vice

Snell & Wilmer LLP

l5 W. South Temple, Suite 1200

salt Lake city, uT 84101

Email: asorenson@swlaw.com

Of Attorneysfor Defendant SunTrust Mortgage, Inc.

Paul R. Dieseth, admitted pro hac vice

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

50 South Sixth St., Suite 1500

Minneapolis, MN 55402

Emai I : dieseth.psul@dorsey.com

Of Attorneysfor Defendant U.S. Bank National

Association, in its individual capacity

MARTIN, BISCHOFF, TEMPLETON,

LANGSLET & HOFFMAN LLP

By: sÆhrllp A-Bu¡h

Philip A. Rush, OSB #893526

Michael J. Farrell, OSB #902587

Alice S. Newlin, OSB #084314

Of Attorneys for Counterclaim-Defendant Federal

Home Loan Mortgage Corporation

MARTIN, BISCHOFF, TEMPLETON ' urueslÉr a norrn¡añ llp

Atlornoys at Law

888 SW F¡fth Av€nuo. Suit€ 900

Portland, OR 97204

Tolephone (503) 224-3113

Fax (5O3') 224-9471

Page 3 - CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Case 3:15-cv-01246-PK Document 180 Filed 07/23/15 Page 13 of 13